alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012243EN.01002601.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/26

---

Action brought on 5 June 2012 — Uralita v Commission

(Case T-250/12)

2012/C 243/46

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Uralita, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: K. Struckmann, lawyer and G. Forwood, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Article 1(2) of the Decision of the European Commission C(2012) 1965 of 27 March 2012 amending Decision C(2008)2626 of 11 June 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (now Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.695 — SODIUM CHLORATE), in so far as it imposes a fine of EUR 4 231 000 on the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Article 1(2) of the Decision of the European Commission C(2012) 1965 of 27 March 2012 amending Decision C(2008)2626 of 11 June 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (now Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.695 — SODIUM CHLORATE), in so far as it imposes a fine of EUR 4 231 000 on the applicant;

| — | Article 2 of the Commission’s decision C(2012) 1965 of 27 March 2012 — Case COMP/38.695 — Sodium Chlorate; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 2 of the Commission’s decision C(2012) 1965 of 27 March 2012 — Case COMP/38.695 — Sodium Chlorate; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two alternative pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the decision to impose a fine after the expiry of the limitation period contained in Article 25(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1), and to retain the interest accrued on this sum, was unlawful. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the decision to impose a fine after the expiry of the limitation period contained in Article 25(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1), and to retain the interest accrued on this sum, was unlawful.

1

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging, in the alternative, that it was unlawful for the Commission to withhold the amount of the fine imposed by Decision C(2012) 1965 of 27 March 2012, including interest, before the fine became due. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging, in the alternative, that it was unlawful for the Commission to withhold the amount of the fine imposed by Decision C(2012) 1965 of 27 March 2012, including interest, before the fine became due.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1)

1

---
# C_2014439EN.01002701.xml

| 8.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2014 — Grau Ferrer v OHIM — Rubio Ferrer (Bugui va)

(Case T-543/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community mark Bugui va - Earlier national figurative mark Bugui and earlier Community figurative mark BUGUI - Relative ground for refusal - Rejection of the opposition - Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Existence of the earlier mark - Evidence presented in support of the opposition before the Board of Appeal not taken into account - Board of Appeal’s discretion - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Article 15(1), second paragraph, point (a) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character))

(2014/C 439/36)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Xavier Grau Ferrer (Caldes de Montbui, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and A. Folliard-Montguiral, Agents)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Juan Cándido Rubio Ferrer (Xeraco, Spain) and Alberto Rubio Ferrer (Xeraco) (represented by: A. Cañizares Doménech, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 October 2012 (Joined Cases R 274/2011-4 and R 520/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Xavier Grau Ferrer on the one hand and, on the other hand, Juan Cándido Rubio Ferrer and Alberto Rubio Ferrer.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 October 2012 (Joined Cases R 274/2011-4 and R 520/2011-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 11 October 2012 (Joined Cases R 274/2011-4 and R 520/2011-4);

| 2. | Declares that OHIM is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Xavier Grau Ferrer; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that OHIM is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Xavier Grau Ferrer;

| 3. | Declares that Juan Cándido Rubio Ferrer and Alberto Rubio Ferrer are to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that Juan Cándido Rubio Ferrer and Alberto Rubio Ferrer are to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40342-40343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19737]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. ER97-940-000 and ER97-2618-000]


Montana-Dakota Utilities Company; Notice of Filing

July 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 9, 1997, Montana-Dakota Utilities Company 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced dockets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before August 1, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be

[[Page 40343]]

taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19737 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1919 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1919

    To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for 
  transporting minors in foreign commerce for the purposes of female 
                          genital mutilation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2011

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide penalties for 
  transporting minors in foreign commerce for the purposes of female 
                          genital mutilation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Girls Protection Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORT FOR FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION.

    Section 116 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(d) Whoever knowingly transports from the United States and its 
territories a person in foreign commerce for the purpose of conduct 
with regard to that person that would be a violation of subsection (a) 
if the conduct occurred within the United States, or attempts to do so, 
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or 
both.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4050-4051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-1976]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking 
company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the 
nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act, including whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices'' (12 U.S.C.      1843). Unless otherwise 
noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United 
States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications

[[Page 4051]]

must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the 
Board of Governors not later than February 21, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth R. Binning, 
Director, Bank Holding Company) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. Santa Barbara Bancorp, Santa Barbara, California; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of First Valley Bank, Lompoc, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 22, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-1976 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
No. 46488.

#### Protest 48798-K of Dan Brechner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

On the authority of Abstract 40492 the paper balls in question were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1413 in accordance with stipulation of counsel.
#### CAREY et al v. CONRAD.

May 6, 1837.

*Rule to show cause why defendant should not be discharged from arrest,*

A debtor discharged under the general insolvent laws of this commonwealth, is protected from arrest as to all debts incurred before his discharge, whether in this or in sister states, or to citizens of this or sister states.

THIS was an action brought to September term, 1834. The plaintiffs declared on defendant’s note in their favour, dated at New York, August 3d, 1831, and obtained judgment. The defendant was discharged under the insolvent laws of this state, in Philadelphia, in October, 1833, returning this debt in his petition. The plaintiffs issued a *capias ad satisfaciendum*to March term. 1837, and the defendant moved to be discharged from arrest on the ground of his discharge. The plaintiffs had always resided in New York, and the defendant in Philadelphia.

*Alleson,*for the rule,

*Jach,*contra.

*93Per Curiam.—The

The general insolvent laws of this commonwealth intend, that a person obtaining his discharge under them shall be protected from arrest for any debt incurred before such discharge, whether incurred in this or a sister state, or to a citizen of this or a sister state. Defendant must be discharged.

Rule absolute.
No. 39234.

#### Protest 360481-G of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Carreker Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending January 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John D. Carreker, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ JOHN D. CARREKER, JR.                      |  | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | 
|John D. Carreker, Jr., Chief Executive Officer |  | 

Dated:
May 2, 2006

---



QuickLinks
Before the First Division,

October 20, 1943

No. 48890.

#### Protests 95940-K, etc., of Yardley & Co., Ltd. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the protests were sustained as to item No. 2791 on the invoices in question.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41073-41074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-054-1210-00]


Closure of Public Lands to Motorized Vehicles, Shoshone Resource 
Area

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior

ACTION: Closure of public land to motorized vehicles.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is given that a way and surrounding adjacent public 
land in the Little City of Rocks Wilderness Study Area (WSA) (ID-54-5, 
Shoshone/Sun Valley Environmental Impact Statement, 1986), in Gooding 
County, Idaho is closed to motorized use year round. The closed area 
includes all public land in Township 3 South, Range 15 East, Section 33 
except for a signed parking area south of the historic stone and 
earthen dam in the Little City of Rocks WSA. Motorized cross country 
travel has caused significant surface disturbance in the described 
area. The purpose of the closure is to prevent unacceptable impacts to 
soils and vegetation in compliance with the Interim Management Policy 
Guidance for WSAs. All public land administered by the Bureau of Land 
Management within the above described area is closed to motorized 
vehicle use indefinitely from the date of this notice.

[[Page 41074]]

    Exemptions from this closure may be approved by the Authorized 
Officer. Exemptions may be approved for federal, state, and local 
government personnel on official duty, emergency service personnel 
including medical, search and rescue, and other licensed or permitted 
individuals.
    The authority for this closure is 43 CFR 8364-1.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula Perletti, Outdoor Recreation 
Planner, Shoshone Resource Area, P.O. Box 2-B, Shoshone Idaho 83352, 
telephone (208) 886-2206.

    Dated: July 7, 1997.
Bill A. Baker,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-20087 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997             NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997             NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,649,774               1,422,783
<SECURITIES>                                 3,800,688               3,180,881
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,595,598               5,084,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (664,325)             (1,066,549)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,014,672               5,875,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,163,889              14,053,985
<PP&E>                                       2,470,524               2,335,973
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,820,855)             (1,451,230)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,867,759              16,708,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,139,768               4,983,870
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        72,135                  71,675
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,655,856              11,652,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,867,759              16,708,079
<SALES>                                     37,708,922              39,469,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,002,875              39,705,023
<CGS>                                       14,460,364              15,171,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,730,052              37,790,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,281,579              22,522,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (17,779)                  45,855
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,888                  50,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,272,823               1,914,626
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,267,188                 799,692
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,005,635               1,114,934
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,005,635               1,114,934
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25                     .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25                     .14
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1999 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1999

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to apply the frailty 
adjustment under PACE payment rules to certain specialized MA plans for 
                       special needs individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2011

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Franken) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to apply the frailty 
adjustment under PACE payment rules to certain specialized MA plans for 
                       special needs individuals.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Senior Medicare Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF MA FRAILTY ADJUSTMENT.

    Section 1853(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395w-23(a)(1)(B)(iv)) is amended--
            (1) in subclause (I), by adding at the end the following 
        new sentence: ``For plan year 2013 and subsequent plan years, 
        with respect to a plan that is described in subclause (III), 
        the Secretary shall apply payment rules under section 1894(d) 
        (other than paragraph (3) of such section) rather than the 
        payment rules that would otherwise apply under this part for 
        plan enrollees described in section 1894(c).''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subclause:
                                    ``(III) Plan described.--A plan 
                                described in this subclause is a 
                                specialized MA plan for special needs 
                                individuals described in section 
                                1859(b)(6)(B)(ii) that offers 
                                integrated Medicare and Medicaid 
                                services under a contract with the 
                                State Medicaid agency under title XIX 
                                and is offered by an MA organization 
                                that as of January 1, 2010, had a 
                                contract with such State Medicaid 
                                agency that participated in the 
                                `Demonstrations Serving Those Dually-
                                Eligible for Medicare and Medicaid' 
                                under this title.''.
                                 <all>
```