alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1612 

To provide the Department of Justice with additional tools to target 

extraterritorial drug trafficking activity. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. CASEY, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, and Mr. WYDEN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide the Department of Justice with additional tools 

to target extraterritorial drug trafficking activity. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Targeting 

5 Transnational Drug Trafficking Act of 2011’’. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1612 IS

1 SEC. 2. POSSESSION, MANUFACTURE OR DISTRIBUTION 

2 FOR PURPOSES OF UNLAWFUL IMPORTA3 TIONS. 

4 (a) POSSESSION, MANUFACTURE OR DISTRIBUTION

5 FOR PURPOSES OF UNLAWFUL IMPORTATIONS.—Section 

6 1009 of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act 

7 (21 U.S.C. 959) is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as 

9 subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and 

10 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘It shall’’ and 

11 all that follows and inserting the following: ‘‘It shall 

12 be unlawful for any person to manufacture or dis13 tribute a controlled substance in schedule I or II or 

14 flunitrazepam intending, knowing, or having reason15 able cause to believe that such substance will be un16 lawfully imported into the United States or into 

17 waters within a distance of 12 miles of the coast of 

18 the United States. 

19 ‘‘(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to manufac20 ture or distribute a listed chemical— 

21 ‘‘(1) intending or knowing that the listed chem22 ical will be used to manufacture a controlled sub23 stance; and 

24 ‘‘(2) intending, knowing, or having reasonable 

25 cause to believe that the controlled substance will be 

26 unlawfully imported into the United States.’’. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1612 IS

1 (b) ATTEMPT AND CONSPIRACY.—Section 1013 of 

2 the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 

3 U.S.C. 963) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: ‘‘For a conspiracy to commit such an offense that 

5 requires the person to intend, know, or have reasonable 

6 cause to believe that a controlled substance will be unlaw7 fully imported into the United States, it is sufficient to 

8 prove a conspiracy to commit the offense that only 1 mem9 ber of the conspiracy intended, knew, or had reasonable 

10 cause to believe that the controlled substance would be un11 lawfully imported into the United States.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 45332.

#### Protest 45596-K of Nadel & Shimmel (New York).

' Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstracts 44122 and 32264 metal kazoos were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Memry Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2003 (the Report), I, James G. Binch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/ James G. Binch      
|------------------------
|James G. Binch          
|Chief Executive Officer 
|                        
|Date: September 29, 2003



This certification is
made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
# C_2014102EN.01003001.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/30

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia

(Case C-188/13) (1)

1

2014/C 102/45

Language of the case: Slovene

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.

1

---
# C_2014409EN.01002502.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/25

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon — Greece) — Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi AE

(Case C-535/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Trade marks - Right of the proprietor of a trade mark to oppose the placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) of goods bearing that mark without his consent))

2014/C 409/37

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

Applicant:

Defendant: Maria Patmanidi AE

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Articles 5 and 7 of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, as amended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992, and Articles 9 and 13 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark may oppose the initial placing on the market within the European Economic Area or the European Union of goods bearing that mark without his consent.

---

(1)  OJ C 377, 21.12.2013.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 

I, Gary W. Macleod, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-KSB of Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s annual report for the year ended July 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditor and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

(a) All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: November 13, 2006
EXHIBIT 99.13




MARK ROSS
 c/o Rubicon Minerals Corporation
 P.O. Box 274,
 103 McMarmac Road,
 Cochenour, Ontario, Canada
 P0V 1L0
 Phone: 1-807-662-7026
 
 
 CONSENT
 
 
 March 27, 2015
 
 Rubicon Minerals Corporation
 44 Victoria Street, Suite 400
 Toronto, Ontario
 Canada M5C 1Y2
 
 And
 
 United States Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 
 Dear Sirs/Mesdames:
 
 
 I hereby consent to being named in the Annual Information Form of the Company, dated March 27, 2015 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “AIF”) and to the use of the technical and scientific information I have reviewed and approved relating to the Company’s properties, which information is contained in the AIF and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
 
 I also consent to the incorporation by reference of the above information into Rubicon Minerals Corporation’s Registration Statement (No. 333-194076) on Form F-10.
 
 
 Sincerely,
 
 /s/ Mark Ross
 
 Mark Ross,B.Sc., P.Geo
 Chief Mine Geologist
 Rubicon Minerals Corporation
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q/A of Advanced Technologies Group,
Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), the
undersigned, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: November 19, 2009
                                            /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                            ------------------------------------
                                      Name: Alex Stelmak
                                            Chief Executive Officer,
                                            Chairman of the Board and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IMATRON
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000720477
<NAME>                          Imatron Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                          10862
<SECURITIES>                    14171
<RECEIVABLES>                    6710
<ALLOWANCES>                    (1110)
<INVENTORY>                     10393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                42685
<PP&E>                          16814
<DEPRECIATION>                  (6712)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  53192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            9643
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                        89223
<OTHER-SE>                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   40,869
<SALES>                         25768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                25768
<CGS>                           24787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   24787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                13,737
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                     (13,737)
<NET-INCOME>                   (13,737)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.18)
        


</TABLE>
No. 6059.

#### BENJAMIN CIY vs. JOHN FERRAN.

Syllabus.

Involves only issues of fact.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “B’’ No. 101,488. Hon. P. D. King, Judge.

F. Rivers Richardson, for plaintiff and appellee.

D. H. Theard, for defendant and appellant.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

This is a claim for the value of a horse injured by a float in charge of defendant’s driver. Only questions of fact are involved and these were resolved by the trial Judge in favor of plaintiff.

Eliminating the testimony of the driver, who says he was passing six fee't away, there is no conflict whatever between the testimony of Cornee, a witness for defendant, and the witnesses for plaintiff. The horse was injured clearly because the float was driven so close as to cause him to move and in moving he put his foot under the wheel of the heavy float.

. We think, however, that the trial Judge allowed too much as the value of the horse, to-wit, $125; that was the price paid for him about eight months before he was hurt; but the evidence shows that though hurt on one forefoot only, he had both forefeet unsound; and here again the witnesses agree, in effect, that the injury to one forefoot could not have produced the trouble in the other.

*218Opinion and decree, March 23rd, 1914.

A witness for the defendant fixes his value at $50 to • $60, had he been sound.

But even unsound he might have lasted yet awhile, and it is certain that the injury he received did him no good.

Plaintiff was, therefore, damaged to some extent, but we think that $75 for the horse and reimbursement for veterinary fees amounting to $18, will fully compensate him.

It is, therefore, ordered that the judgment appealed from be amended by reducing the amount awarded plaintiff from $143 to ninety-three dollars ($93), and as thus amended it is affirmed; plaintiff to pay costs of appeal and defendant to pay the costs of the Court a qua.

Amended and affirmed.
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/diseaseandconditions/outbreaks/responding-to-outbreaks.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/diseaseandconditions/outbreaks/responding-to-outbreaks.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
# C_2014184EN.01002404.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 19 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim — Germany) — Peter Link v Condor Flugdienst GmbH

(Case C-471/13) (1)

1

2014/C 184/40

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23. 11. 2013.

1

---
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Qinan Ji, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 19, 2010





/s/ Qinan JiQinan
      Ji, Principal Executive
Officer
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

209) IV-C-176 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:02 AM Sheet 209 of 232 
PJ_ 

A-S#-^ 

* *

 Ti UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 1532/ 

JUL 3 | 1991 

Ms. Elizabeth H. Haskell 

Secretary of Natural Resources^-^^ , \r,V mTM££rm 

Commonwealth of Virgini a toTf e % ^ • r"' 

OOffic f f ir«eo r\f of 4 th- h _ea rZ/-\^r___iT-rir. GovernorK ur \ \ nn 1 Vb^-* z***^^^ \ t i 

Richmond, VA 23219 Wvi\ - mot VDear Ms. Haskell: V' . _^——^ •-r 

This is in response to yodr ^§£ter^t-o-~EPA Assistant 

Administrator William G. RosenbWg"^d1iTed July 2, 1991, 

regarding the implementation of onboard refueling vapor 

controls for motor vehicles. We appreciate your comments. 

In the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, Congress directed 

the EPA to promulgate an onboard rule within one year of 

enactment, that is, by November 1991. It also directed EPA to 

consult with the Department of Transportation (DOT) regarding 

onboard system safety as part of this rulemaking. This 

consultation is well underway. The National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), which is part of the DOT, is 

planning to release an updated assessment in the very near 

future. When we receive this report, EPA will publish a notice 

in the Federal Register announcing the reopening of the public 

comment period on the onboard proposal, and seeking comment 

on NHTSA's safety study and other circumstances which have 

changed since the proposal was published in 1987. We will also 

conduct a public hearing on the matter later this summer. Once 

we have completed this public participation process, EPA will 

take further action on the rulemaking based on the 

consultations with NHTSA and the record developed during the 

public hearing/comment process. 

Thank you again for your comments. They will be included 

in the public docket for this rulemaking. Please feel free to 

contact me if you require any additional information. 

Sincerely yours, 

Charles N. Freed 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

SDSB:Passavant:Tuggle:2565 Plymouth Rd:X-349:7/30/91:ID#9605W 

Last Reviewed by Charles Gray 7/30/91:Control No. OAR-91-0437 

Reviewed by JCabaniss:BR:X27647:AR-455:7/30/91:Wang No. 2360T 

Printed on Recycled Paper
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AS
                              OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1995,  AND
                              THE  STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND THE STATEMENTS OF
                              CASH FLOW FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
                              1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                              TO SUCH  ANNUAL  REPORT  ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
                              ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                            1,994,217  
<SECURITIES>                                      2,464,120  
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,671,973  
<ALLOWANCES>                                         90,000  
<INVENTORY>                                         739,201  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7,049,446  
<PP&E>                                            1,576,511  
<DEPRECIATION>                                      600,180  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8,458,614  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,568,994  
<BONDS>                                             265,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             41,097 
<OTHER-SE>                                        6,583,168 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8,458,614 
<SALES>                                           8,414,005 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8,414,005 
<CGS>                                             5,516,936 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5,516,936 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,709,171 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     67,085 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    5,376 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     347,591 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        150,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 197,591
<DISCONTINUED>                                      311,092 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        508,683
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .10   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .10
        

</TABLE>
No. 74-5741.

#### Hardwick *v.*Caldwell, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.