alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00336-CR

MICHAEL RAY FERGUSON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. C37620-CR

ORDER

This appeal was placed “at issue” on July 7, 2019. After reviewing the briefs, the 

Court learned that one of appellant’s issues challenges the trial court’s ruling on 

appellant’s motion to suppress. However, the Court has no transcription of the motion 

to suppress as a part of the reporter’s record.

Accordingly, the “at issue” status of this appeal is set aside. The Court Reporter 

is ORDERED to supplement the reporter’s record within 21 days from the date of this 
Ferguson v. State Page 2

order with a transcription of the hearing on appellant’s Motion to Suppress which 

appears to have occurred on or about May 30, 2018.1

 PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Order issued and filed January 10, 2020

[RWR]

 

1

It appears a reporter’s record was prepared but not filed because the briefs of the parties referenced a 

reporter’s record. Accordingly, this appeal will again be considered “at issue” when the required record is 

filed unless a party files a motion for additional briefing based on the record filed.
MICHAEL A. LALONDE


c/o Rubicon Minerals Corporation


Suite 902 – 170 University Way


Toronto, Ontario, Canada


M5H 3B3




Phone: 1-416-766-2804






CONSENT




March 26th, 2014






Rubicon Minerals Corporation


Suite 1540 – 800 West Pender Street,


Vancouver, B.C.


V6C 2V6




And




United States Securities and Exchange Commission






Dear Sirs/Mesdames:




I hereby consent to being named in the Annual Information Form of the Company, dated March 26, 2014 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “AIF”) and to the use of the technical information prepared by me or under my supervision relating to the Company’s Red Lake properties, which information is contained in the AIF and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.




I also consent to the incorporation by reference of the above information into Rubicon Minerals Corporation’s Registration Statement (No. 333-194076) on Form F-10.








Sincerely,




/s/ “Michael A. Lalonde”




Michael A. Lalonde,P.Eng


President and Chief Executive Officer


Rubicon Minerals Corporation
#### Nathan Newman *v.*United States

No. 6577.

Entry No. 751725.

Invoice dated Sheffield, England, January 25, 1946.

Certified January 29, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 24, 1946.

(Decided December 5, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  into the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated  November 14, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated   financial   statements  of  X-ceed,   Inc.  (formerly   Water-Jel
Technologies,  Inc.)  included in the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended August 31, 1997.



s/ Holtz Rubenstein & Co., LLP              
HOLTZ RUBENSTEIN & CO., LLP
Melville, New York
March 5, 1998
Case No. 8,734.

#### McCREADY v. The ROBERT I. POULSON.

[3 Hughes, 494.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Maryland.

July 5, 1879.

Collision — Failure to Show Lights — Fault.

Where a vessel sailing without a light collides with another properly navigated and equipped, the fault is hers, and she must bear the loss.

[This was a libel in admiralty by James W. McCready against the schooner Robert I. Poulson.]

BOND, Circuit Judge.

This cause having been heard and considered, the court doth *1350find the facts to- be,- that the libellant was the owner, on the 4th day of January, 1878, of the sloop Sirocco, which at that time was sailing up the Chesapeake Bay,- from Blob Jack Bay to Baltimore, with a cargo of oysters. At about 2 a. m. of that day she saw approaching her the schooner Robert I. Poulson, with which she collided, and was a total loss. And the court finds that the schooner Robert I. Poulson was • properly navigated and equipped, and that the sloop had no light, and that the collision was caused by that fact. And it finds the conclusion of law to be that where a collision occurs by the fault of one vessel only, it must pay all damages and bear all the loss. And it will be so decreed.
No. 96-7925.

#### Badley *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[House Document 111-84]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 111-84

 
                      VETO MESSAGE ON H.J. RES. 64

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

    NOTIFICATION OF THE VETO OF H.J. RES. 64, THE ``MAKING FURTHER 
     CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010, AND FOR OTHER 
                               PURPOSES''

  January 13, 2010.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Appropriations and ordered to be printed
                       Memorandum of Disapproval

    The enactment of H.R. 3326 (Department of Defense 
Appropriations Act, 2010, Public Law 111-118), which was signed 
into law on December 19, 2009, has rendered the enactment of 
H.J. Res. 64 (Continuing Appropriations, FY 2010) unnecessary. 
Accordingly, I am withholding my approval from the bill. (The 
Pocket Veto Case, 279 U.S. 655 (1929)).
    To leave no doubt that the bill is being vetoed as 
unnecessary legislation, in addition to withholding my 
signature, I am also returning H.J. Res. 64 to the Clerk of the 
House of Representatives, along with this Memorandum of 
Disapproval.

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, December 30, 2009.

                                  

```
Before the First Division,

January 31, 1941

No. 45328.

#### Protest 24973-K of General Aniline Works, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

The commodity here involved was produced with 49-52 percent of oleic acid which, it was stipulated, was derived from tallow. The claim at 3 cents per pound under section 702 was therefore sustained.
#### Rohrer *v.*Milk Control Board, Appellant.

*258Argued May 25, 1936.

Before Kephart, C. J., Schaefer, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern and Barnes, JJ.

*281*Charles J. Margiotti,*Attorney General, with him *Harry Polihof,*Deputy Attorney General, and *W. F. Daniels,*Deputy Attorney General, for Commonwealth.

*Thomas Raeburn White,*with him *W. Hensel Brown*and *Richard C. Bull,*for appellee.

*Francis Biddle,*of *Barnes, Biddle & Myers,*for interested parties, under Rule 61.

*Thomas W. Spofford,*with him *Charles Edwin Fose,*for interested parties, under Rule 61.

*Geo. Ross Hull,*for interested parties, under Rule 61.

June 26, 1936:

2

“. . . nor can he be deprived of his life, liberty or property, unless by the judgment of his peers or the law of the land.” See Constitution of 1776, Declaration of Rights, clause 9, Constitution of 1790, article IX, section 9, verbatim, Constitution of 1838, article IX, section 9, verbatim.

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Kephart,

The majority of the members of this court, Mr. Justice Schaffer and Mr. Justice Drew dissenting, agree *282that the decision certified to us by the Superior Court should be reversed on the dissenting opinion written by President Judge Keller of that court, reported in 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 281. Mr. Justice Schaffer and Mr. Justice Drew are of opinion that the decision of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Parker of that court.

Judgment reversed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Alan L. Wells, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2009 |  | /s/ Alan L. Wells                                                                                                 
|                     |  | Alan L. Wells                                                                                                     
|                     |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Principal Executive Officer Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.



39
No. 47699.

#### Protests 687285-G, etc., of International Harvest Hat Co. et el. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Upon the agreed facts and following *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), certain of the harvest hats in question were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those imported subsequent tó the Netherlands Trade Agreement, T. D. 48075, were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), as claimed.
Before the Second Division,

February 6, 1941

No. 45348.

#### Protests 917753-G, etc., of Green Kay Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallingee, J.

On the authority of *Dulien Steel Products*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 285, C. A. D. 102) the malleable cast-iron pipe fittings in question were held properly classified at 45 percent under paragraph 397.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Windsor Woodmont Black Hawk Resort Corp., a Colorado
corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated: August 14, 2003         /s/ Jerry L. Dauderman
                               -----------------------------------
                               Jerry Dauderman
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 14, 2003         /s/ Michael L. Armstrong
                               -----------------------------------
                               Michael L. Armstrong
                               Executive Vice President and
                               Chief Financial Officer
No.44359.

#### Protests 760927-G, etc., of F. H. Shallus Co. et al. (Baltimore and Boston).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
#### ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL RETARDATION v. MARSHALL COUNTY TREATMENT CENTER.

2970412.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 10, 1998.

G.R. “Rick” Trawick, Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, for appellant.

Steven T. Marshall of McLaughlin & Marshall, L.L.C., Guntersville, for appellee.

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

*249See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala.R.App. P.; § 41-22-18, Ala.Code 1975; *Ex parte Lake Forest Property Owners’ Ass’n,*603 So.2d 1045 (Ala.1992); *Trim Bldg. Corp. v. White,*594 So.2d 124 (Ala.Civ.App.1991); and *Regional Dialysis v. Northeast Alabama Kidney Clinic, Inc.,*480 So.2d 1226 (Ala.Civ.App.), ce*rt. denied,*480 So.2d 1229 (Ala.1985).

YATES, MONROE, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

CRAWLEY, J., dissents.

CRAWLEY, Judge,

dissenting.

I must respectfully dissent. At the time of the hearing, the Marshall County Treatment Center (the “Center”) knew of the hearing officer’s involvement in the certification process; nevertheless, it failed to object to the hearing officer. The challenge to the hearing officer came too late to be considered. The Center waived its objection. *See Adams v. Board of Trustees of the University of South Alabama,*676 So.2d 1326, 1328 (Ala.Civ.App.1996) (citing *Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co.,*799 F.2d 1464, 1472 (11th Cir.1986), *cert. denied,*481 U.S. 1016, 107 S.Ct. 1893, 95 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987)) (stating that a party may not “lie in wait and raise the issue of recusal after learning the outcome of the proceeding”). The Center has also failed to “overcome [the] presumption of honesty and integrity in those serving as [hearing officers].” *Evans v. State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners,*662 So.2d 262, 264 (Ala.Civ.App.1994).
April 11, 1958

Reap. Dec. 9133.

#### C. *J. Tower*& *Sons*v. *United States.*

Entered at Niagara Falls, N. Y. Reap. Dec. 9092. Motion by plaintiff.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John C.K. Sham, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Global-Tech Appliances Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; and 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report. 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

(c) Disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 10, 2004
No. 48253.

#### Petition 6179-R of S. Hata Shoten, Ltd. (Honolulu, T. H.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The record consisted of a deposition of a clerk in Honolulu employed to make entries for the American Customs Brokerage Co., who made the entry in question as agents for the petitioner. It appeared that certain new instructions had been given as to the method of making entries and that the invoice in question was one of the first ones to be executed thereafter; that certain information was buried in the description of the merchandise appearing on the invoice, and that had he noticed it he would have made the necessary increase in the entered value. The court was of the opinion that the record disclosed a clear case of inadvertence or carelessness in entering, and negatives any implication of intention to defraud the United States of any of its lawful duties. The petition was therefore granted, following *United States*v. *Fish*(268 U. S. 607). *Ittmann*v. *United States*(T. D. 49481) and *Freedman*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 354, C. D. 494) distinguished.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00339-CV

Yolanda L. KYLE,

Appellant

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 377265

Honorable Jason Pulliam, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 28, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellant’s brief, which was due on October 10, 2012, has not been filed. On October 

26, 2012, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not respond. Appellee has also filed a motion 

to dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute. Accordingly, the motion is granted, and the appeal 

is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal 

are taxed against appellant. 

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25644-25645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10049]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
    Title: Survey of International Travel Expenditures.
    OMB Control Number: None.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 1,000.
    Number of Respondents: 6,000.
    Average Hours per Response: 10 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: The proposed survey of international travel 
expenditures is authorized by the Bretton Woods Agreements Act, Section 
8, and Executive Order 10033, as amended. The Act allows the DOC/BEA to 
collect the data necessary to produce the U.S. international 
transactions accounts (ITAs), which are part of the U.S. obligations to 
the International Monetary Fund.
    The survey will collect information on travel expenditures by 
method of payment (cash, credit card, etc.) from U.S. travelers 
returning from abroad and foreign travelers leaving the United States.

[[Page 25645]]

    This survey is needed to improve the quality of the travel 
component of the U.S. ITAs, which are used by government and other 
organizations for national and international economic policy 
formulation and analytical purposes.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: One-time only.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Paul Bugg, (202) 395-3093.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b7f5362757e705b7f7478357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5b19dacbbb0be95b1bab6fbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Paul Bugg, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7245 or via e-mail 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f68694839191b6999b94d8939986d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e29280978585a28d8f80cc878d92cc858d94">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 2, 2008.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
 [FR Doc. E8-10049 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-EA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 12, 2022 No. 04-22-00490-CV IN THE INTEREST OF B.H. JR. , a Child From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVPC-21-0000219 Honorable Robert J. Falkenberg, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights, and this court must disposed of it within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2. The reporter’s record was due by August 4, 2022, and the court reporter filed a notification of late record requesting an extension until August 12, 2022. After consideration, we grant the request and order the court reporter to file the reporter’s record by August 12, 2022

. It is so ORDERED on August 12, 2022. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT
Before the First Division,

November 6, 1942

No. 47703.

#### Protests 76166-K, etc., of Cisco, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.