alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


                                 CERTIFICATION


I, Art Malone, Jr., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Secured Data, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures; and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
          about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
          of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on
          such evaluation;

     d)   disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
          registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

..


Date: November 19, 2003


/s/ Art Malone, Jr.
----------------------
Art Malone, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2123 

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to extend funding for familyto-family health information centers to help families of children with 

disabilities or special health care needs make informed choices about 

health care for their children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2012 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. CONRAD, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to extend funding for family-to-family health information centers to 

help families of children with disabilities or special health 

care needs make informed choices about health care for 

their children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2123 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FUNDING FOR FAMILY-TO-FAM2 ILY HEALTH INFORMATION CENTERS. 

3 Section 501(c)(1)(A)(iii) of the Social Security Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 701(c)(1)(A)(iii)) is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### John A. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-0630.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 21, 1998.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Siobhan Helene Shea, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence in this case. However, we remand to the trial court for correction of clerical errors on the judgment and sentence as follows. The judgment should be corrected to reflect that appellant was convicted after a non-jury trial, rather than after a plea of nolo contendere. Additionally, the judgment incorrectly lists section 843.01 as the applicable statute for resisting arrest without violence. The correct statutory reference is section 843.02. The public defender’s motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), is granted.

STONE, C.J., and GUNTHER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40527-40528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19946]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

[[Page 40528]]

    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 22, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Rockdale National Bankshares, Inc., Conyers, Georgia; to become 
a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Rockdale National Bank, Conyers, Georgia (in organization).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 24, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-19946 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
# C_2017104EN.01000301.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 January 2017 — Hansa Metallwerke AG and Others v European Commission, Council of the European Union

(Case C-611/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria - Coordination of selling prices and exchange of sensitive business information - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2) - Ceiling of 10 % of turnover - Obligation to state reasons - Protection of legitimate expectations))

(2017/C 104/04)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Hansa Metallwerke AG, Hansa Nederland BV, Hansa Italiana Srl, Hansa Belgium, Hansa Austria GmbH (represented by: S. Cappellari, H.-J. Hellmann and C. Malz, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Malferrari and R. Sauer, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Hansa Metallwerke AG, Hansa Nederland BV, Hansa Italiana Srl, Hansa Belgium and Hansa Austria GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hansa Metallwerke AG, Hansa Nederland BV, Hansa Italiana Srl, Hansa Belgium and Hansa Austria GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.

1

---
# C_2015171EN.01000401.xml

| 26.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania)) — ‘Litaksa’ UAB v ‘BTA Insurance Company’ SE

(Case C-556/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Compulsory insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 90/232/EEC - Article 2 - Differentiation in the amount of the insurance premium depending on the territory in which the vehicle is used))

(2015/C 171/05)

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Referring court

Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘Litaksa’ UAB

Applicant:

Defendant:‘BTA Insurance Company’ SE

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2 of the Third Council Directive 90/232/EEC of 14 May 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, as amended by Directive 2005/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that a premium which varies according to whether the insured vehicle is to be used only in the territory of the Member State in which that vehicle is normally based or in the entire territory of the European Union does not fall within the concept of ‘single premium’, within the meaning of that article.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2168 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2168

 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to modify the definition of 
                              supervisor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2012

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Harkin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to modify the definition of 
                              supervisor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Re-empowerment of Skilled and 
Professional Employees and Construction Tradesworkers Act'' or the 
``RESPECT Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT.

    Section 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 
152(11)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``and for a majority of the individual's 
        worktime'' after ``interest of the employer'';
            (2) by striking ``assign,''; and
            (3) by striking ``or responsibly to direct them,''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-66620), (No. 333-66123), (No. 333-66121), (No.
333-66119) and (No. 033-63865) of ATC Healthcare, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our
report dated May 12, 2003, except for the fifth paragraph of Note 8(a) as to
which the date is June 13, 2003, relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




                                       PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Melville, New York
November 3, 2003



















                                       47
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-116837on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-126312, 333-126573, 333-127464 and 333-133353 on Form S-3 of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 2006,relating to the consolidated financial statements of SHC Prague InterContinental B.V. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/    Deloitte s.r.o. 

Prague, Czech Republic

February 28, 2008
EXHIBIT 10.17 

COMPENSATION AGREEMENTS WITH NAMED
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

The following are the annual salaries
of our named executive officers as amended by the Compensation Committee (the
Committee) of the Board of Directors effective September 16, 2007. 

	 	Name	 	     	 	Position	 	     	     	 	Salary	 	     
	Kenneth G. Chahine, J.D., Ph.D.  		President, Chief Executive  			$  	    426,613  	
	  		Officer and Director  			 
    	  	
	Michael Coffee  	 	Chief Business
      Officer  			$  	   302,120  	
	M.
      Christina Thomson, J.D.  		Vice President, Corporate  	 		$  	   213,210  	
	  		Counsel and Secretary  		 	 
    	  	
	Kirk
      Johnson, Ph.D.  		Vice President, Research
      and  			$  	   248,824  	
	  		Development 
    			  	  	
	Andrew A. Sauter  		Vice President, Finance  			$  	   238,625  	



The Committee, pursuant to authority
granted by the Board of Directors, approves adjustments to the compensation
packages for Avigen’s executive officers based upon assessments of both
corporate and individual performance objectives and the discretion of the
Committee. 

Bonus payments are determined for each
individual executive officer based on target bonus payments that represent a
percent of base salary between 30% and 45%. Target bonus payments are
subsequently weighted so that the bonus payments received are based on the
assessments of the achievement of corporate performance objectives as well as
the achievement of individual performance objectives. This determination is not
based on a formula, but rather the discretionary determination by the
Committee. 

39
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

(PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. H. Garner, Executive Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of MDS Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: January 27, 2006 | /s/James A. H. Garner(James A. H. Garner)Executive Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 42152.

#### Protests 989563-G, etc., of Moosalina Prod. Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-QSB"), I,
Andrew P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 16, 2004

/s/ Andrew P. Calerich
------------------------
Andrew P. Calerich
Chief Financial Officer
No. 40517.

#### Protests 919636-G, etc., of Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Poliowing the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection
with the Annual Report of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Laurence S. Geller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|Dated: February 24, 2011 
|                         
|/s/    LAURENCE S.
GELLER
|Laurence S. Geller       
|Chief Executive Officer
#### United States *v.*Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.

No. 5980.

Invoice dated Belfast, Ireland, September 4, 1940.

Certified September 5, 1940.

Entered at St. Louis, Mo., October 5, 1940.

Entry No. 289.

(Decided February 9, 1944)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Tompkins & Tompkins {J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:’

This appeal for reappraisment involves the valuation of certain linen cloths and napkins exported from Ireland in September 1940, pursuant to an order accepted by the manufa'cturer on February 23, 1940.

The record herein establishes that the involved merchandise was made expressly for exportation to the United States and that on September 1, 1940, a new price list was issued by the manufacturer, increasing the prices for the involved items.

The principles stated in the case of *White Lamb Finlay, Inc.*v. *United States,*29 C. C. P. A. 199, C. A. D. 192, control the situation *375presented herein. In that case the court held that the price on the date of exportation should be deemed to be the correct value rather than the price at the time of purchase.

I therefore find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as follows:

*Style No. Size Sterling*

155 72 x 90 Cloths 0/21/11 each

155 72 x 108 do 0/26/4 do

155 72 x 144 do 0/33/4 do

155 22 x 22 Napkins 0/21/6 per dozen

Less 3% per centum discount.

Plus Compulsory Government Commodity Insurance *2%*per centum of *per se*unit prices.

Plus case and packing charges as invoiced.

Less cartage to ship as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.