T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). 1 NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T EUGENE A. M AU W EE , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. J A C K P A L M E R ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 15251 D . C . N o . 3 : 1 0 -cv -0 0 2 5 0 -R C JR AM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da R obe rtC l i ve J one s , C hi e f Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. N evada s t at e pri soner E ug ene A . M auw ee appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c o u rt ’ s j u d g me n td i s mi s s i n g h i s 4 2 U . S. C. § 1 9 8 3 a c t i o n a l l e g i n g v ar i o u s c l a i ms a r i s i ng f r om the c onf

i s c a t i on of

a n e a gl e t a l on tha the be l i e ve d t o be aN a t i ve



# FI LED MA R 06 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

A m e r ic a n r e lig io u s a rtif a c t. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ad is m is s a l u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § § 1 9 1 5 A o r1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( ii) . R es ni ck v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F .3 d4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) ; B arr e n v . H arr i ngton , 152 F . 3d 11 93 , 11 94 (9th C i r. 19 98 ) ( order) . W e m ayaf fi rm on any groun d sup po rt ed b yth e r e c o r d . Jo h n so n v. R i versi de H ea l th ca re S

ys. , 53 4 F . 3d 11 16 , 11 21 (9th C i r. 2008) . W e a f

f i rm i n pa rt , va c a t e i n part , r e ve r s e i n part , a nd r e m and. D i s m i s s a l of

M auw e e ’ s c l a i m s a ga i ns tthe S t a t e of N e va da , the N e va da D epartm entof C orre ct i on s, and st at e off i ci al s i n thei r off

i ci alcapaci t i es w as prop er b e c au s e th e s e d e f

e n d a n ts a r e e n title dto im m u n ityu n d e rth e E le v e n th A m e n d m e n t. Se e Fl i nt v . D e nnis on , 488 F . 3d 816, 824- 25 ( 9th C i r . 2007) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dM au w e e ’s E ig h th A m e n d m e n t c la im a ga i ns ts t a t e of

f i c i a l s i n the i ri ndi vi dua l c apa c i t i e s be c aus e he f a i l e d t o a l l e ge how th e d e s tru c tio n o f

th e e a g le ta lo n v io la te dth e E ig h th A m e n d m e n t. See Farm erv. B r e nnan , 51 1 U . S . 82 5, 83 4 (19 94 ) ( el em ent s of E i gh th A m endm entcl ai m ). A l tho ug h the di stri ctcourtprop er l y c on clud ed thatM auw ee fa i l ed t o al l ege a c la im u n d e rth e F ir s t A m e n d m e n t’s F r e e E x e r c is e C lau s e , it s h o u ldh a v e g iv e n h im n o t i ce o f th e d efect s i n th i s cl ai m an dan o p p o rtu n i ty t o am en d , esp eci al l y b ecau se M auw ee ’ s m ot i on for r ec on si dera t i on show ed thatthe defec t s i n thi s c l ai m ar e c u r ab le . See W

ei lb u rgv. Sh a

p i ro , 48 8 F . 3d 12 02 , 12 05 (9th C i r. 20 07 ).3

T he di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d i n di s m i s s i ng M auw e e ’ s F ourt e e nth A m e ndm e ntdue pr oc e s s c l a i m a ga i ns ts t a t e of f i c i a l s i n the i ri ndi vi dua l c apa c i t i e s ba s e d on the avai l abi l i ty of a dequ at e s t at e l aw po st -depri vat i on re m edi es because M auw ee c h a lle n g e dth e d e s tru c tio n o f p r o p e rtyu n d e re s tab lis h e ds ta te p r o c e du r e . Se e L ogan v . Zi m m e rm a n Br u s h Co . , 45 5 U . S . 42 2, 43 5-36 (198 2). In sum , w e a ff

i rm di sm i ss alof M auw ee ’ s c l ai m s a gai nstthe S t at e of N evada, th e N e v a d aD e p a rtm e n t o f C o rr e c tio n s , an ds ta te o f f ic ia ls in th e iro f

f ic ia l c ap a c itie s . An d , a s t o Mau we e ’ s c l a i m s a g a i n s ts t a t e o f f i c i a l s i n th e i ri n d i v i du a l c ap a c i t i e s , we affi rm d i sm i ssal o f h i s E i g h th A m en d m en tcl ai m ; v acat e d i sm i ssal o f h i s F i rst A m e n d m e n t c la im to a llo w h im le a v e to a m e n d ; r e v e r s e d is m is s a l o f h is F o u rte e n th A m en d m en tcl ai m ; an drem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. M auw e e ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons , i nc l udi ng i s s ue s a nd c l a i m s r a i s e d f orthe fi rs tt i m e i n M auw ee ’ s m ot i on for r ec on si dera t i on , ar e unp er suas i ve. W e d o n o t c o n s id e ris s u e s an dc la im s r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See Sm i th v. M

a rsh , 19 4 F . 3d 10 45 , 10 52 (9th C i r. 19 99 ). M au w e e s h a ll b e a rh is o w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. A FFI R M ED i n pa r t , VA C A TED i n pa r t , R EVER SED i n pa r t , a nd RE MAND E D.