alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[111th Congress Public Law 126]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 3]]

Public Law 111-126
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
 for the relief of victims of the earthquake in Haiti. <<NOTE: Jan. 22, 
                         2010 -  [H.R. 4462]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR CHARITABLE CASH 
                              CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF OF VICTIMS 
                              OF EARTHQUAKE IN HAITI.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 170 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any contribution described in 
subsection (b) made after January 11, 2010, and before March 1, 2010, as 
if such contribution was made on December 31, 2009, and not in 2010.
    (b) Contribution Described.--A contribution is described in this 
subsection if such contribution is a cash contribution made for the 
relief of victims in areas affected by the earthquake in Haiti on 
January 12, 2010, for which a charitable contribution deduction is 
allowable under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    (c) Recordkeeping.--In the case of a contribution described in 
subsection (b), a telephone bill showing the name of the donee 
organization, the date of the contribution, and the amount of the 
contribution shall be treated as meeting the recordkeeping requirements 
of section 170(f)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    (d) Paygo.--All applicable provisions in this section are designated 
as an emergency for purposes of pay-as-you-go principles.

    Approved January 22, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4462:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Jan. 20, considered and passed House.
            Jan. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Before the First Division,

April 16, 1942

No. 47094.

#### Protests 53417-K, etc., of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial counsel agreed that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as tñat covered by T. D. 50277 (1). In accordance therewith the claim at 30 percent under paragraph 911 (b) was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Memry Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2005 (the Report), I, James G. Binch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James. G. Binch                                 
|James G. Binch President and Chief Executive
Officer



Dated: October 28, 2005



This certification is made solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPAN'Y QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         210,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    211,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               475,045
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 570,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          462,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   570,384
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               328,454
<CGS>                                          282,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               294,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (248,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (248,641)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30946

 

K. TRACY BERGQUIST,

ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHER

SHAREHOLDERS OF FyBX CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FyBX CORPORATION; MICHAEL P. ARATA;

HOFFMAN, SIEGEL, SEYDEL, BIENVENU, CENTOLA & CORDES,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW FIRM; BORDELON, HAMLIN AND THERIOT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-722-R

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light

of the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent portions of the

record. Having done so, we find no reversible error of fact or law

in the district court’s disposition of this case. We also find

that the district court did not err or abuse its discretion in

regard to the challenged discovery rulings. Finally, Bergquist
2

raised no genuine issue of material fact concerning whether the

Bordelon firm represented FyBX Corporation at any time after

February 15, 1996, when Arata left the firm. Accordingly, we

AFFIRM the judgment for essentially the reasons stated by the

district court.

The motion of Appellee FyBX Corporation for sanctions and

costs is DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR SANCTIONS DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2706

MYRA R. EDWARDS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, AFBCMR,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-3115-DKC)

Submitted: January 14, 1997 Decided: February 6, 1997

Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Myra R. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Kaye A. Allison, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her

claim filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act* and her

claims for damages and remanding her request for a correction to

her late husband's military records to the Air Force Board for

Correction of Military Records for further proceedings. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Edwards v. Department of the Air Force, AFBCMR,

No. CA-95-3115-DKC (D. Md. Oct. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented int he materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSouth Shore Resources Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Michael Kabin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |   

Dated this 9thday of November, 2007.

MICHAEL KABINMichael KabinChief Executive Officer





















---
Mark Hepsworth letter of appointment



 Exhibit 10.2 
  

			
	McGraw-Hill International (U.K.) Limited	 	

  
	Human Resources Dept.	 
	McGraw-Hill House	 
	Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 2QL, England	 
	Telephone (0628) 23431	 
	Fax (0628) 25372	 

 22 May 1995 
 Mr. Mark Hepsworth 
 19 Cristowe Road 
 London SW6
3QF 
 Dear Mark, 
 General Manager – Standard &
Poor’s – Comstock, Europe 
 I am pleased to confirm your appointment to the above post, effective Tuesday 23 May 1995. 
 Attached are McGraw-Hill’s standard “Particulars of Employment”, which outline some of the main benefits, terms and conditions of your employment,
including details of salary level and holiday entitlement. Would you please sign one copy and return it to me, together with the other forms, to signify your acceptance of the position. The second copy is for you to keep. 
 As discussed with Dan Connell, you are eligible to participate in S&P Comstock’s incentive bonus plan, which is determined as follows: 
  

	a)	the NOI performance of S&P Comstock, Europe; 

  

	b)	the revenue performance of S&P Comstock, Europe; 

  

	c)	the NOI performance of S&P Comstock, Inc. 

 Each of the above
components represent a third of the total incentive. 
 For 1995 only, S&P Comstock will guarantee an annual award of at least £25,000-, i.e.
pro-rated for the rest of the year. A start date of 23 May 1995, would provide an award of approximately £15,000- for 1995. 
 Further details
will be provided by Dan. 
 Also, a discretionary cash allowance of £300- per month will be provided in lieu of a company car, should you chose this
option. This allowance is not consolidated into basic salary. 
 contd... 
 McGraw-Hill International (U.K.), Limited Registration No. 64070 








			
	 Mr Mark Hepsworth
	 	22 May 1995

 Also attached are forms relating to bank account details and insurance arrangements 
 On your first day, please report to our Wimbledon offices, bringing with you your P45. 
 May I take this opportunity to welcome you to McGraw-Hill. I wish you a long and happy association with us. 
 Yours
sincerely, 
 /s/ Paul Jenkinson 
 Paul Jenkinson 
 Vice President 
 Corporate Administration.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 3(i)(d)

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                    BULLET ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


Bullet Environmental Technologies, Inc., a corporation duly organized and
existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify that:

I. The amendment to the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation set forth
below were duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and have been consented
to in writing by: (a) the board of directors by their unanimous written
consent; and (b) the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled
to vote thereon in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.

II. Article 1. of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

     "1. The name of the corporation is ComCam, Inc."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby duly executes this Certificate of
Amendment hereby declaring and certifying under penalty of perjury that this
is the act and deed of the Corporation and the facts herein stated are true,
this 3rd day of June, 2002.

                    BULLET ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                    By: /s/ Don Gilbreath
                        -----------------
                    Don Gilbreath, President



                                      30
# C_2014315EN.01004604.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/46

---

Order of the President of the Court of 12 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — UPC DTH Sàrl v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság

(Case C-563/13) (1)

1

2014/C 315/79

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0172.09.005.412 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: 304m 2012 Annual Review CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: 03/20/2012 Time:

11:45

am

pm

Company Name: Tyson Joslin, IL ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Sabol

Contact Name: Kim Rastessin Contact Phone Number: 605-235-4801

General Subject: Nitrate Compound Discharges Reported to TRI in 2009

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

Background:

Tyson’s Joslin Nitrate Compounds Loadings: 

TRI 2009: 4,450,000

TRI 2010 (OTIS): 3,289,150

Telecon Notes: 

I called and left messages for Ms. Kim Rastessin on Tuesday, March 20, 2012 and Monday, March 26, 2012 at 

1:20 PM explaining the purpose for calling. Ms. Rastessin left me a message Monday, March 26 at 2:15 PM 

asking me to return her call. I called Ms. Rastessin back on Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 11:10 am and left a 

message.

On March 29, 2010 I was able to reach Ms. Rastessin to discuss the 2009 TRI nitrate compound discharges. Ms. 

Rastessin stated that she would look into the discrepancy between the 2009 TRI and DMR data. She stated that 

a possible scenario is the calculations/molecular weights for the different “nitrate compounds” and “nitrate, total 

nitrogen (as N)” in the different databases. Additionally, she stated that they recently received their new permit 

from the state implementing the new total nitrogen limits from the ELG. They are currently working with IEPA 

to determine if any additional treatment is necessary to meet the limits.

On March 29, 2010, Ms. Rastessin returned my call and stated that to report the nitrate compound load to TRI, 

they monitor discharges for nitrate-nitrogen. Using the concentration and the molecular weight, the 

concentration (represented as NO3-N) is multiplied by 4.43 to get estimate the nitrate concentration (NO3). 

After calculating the nitrate concentration value, they multiply the concentration by the average flow in 2009 to 

estimate the nitrate compound loading.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2088 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently double the 

amount of start-up expenses entrepreneurs can deduct from their taxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2012 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

double the amount of start-up expenses entrepreneurs 

can deduct from their taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Start5 up Support Act of 2012’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT DOUBLING OF START-UP EXPENSES 

7 DEDUCTION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (ii) of section 

9 195(b)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

10 amended— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2088 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$10,000’’, and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘$60,000’’. 

5 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b) of 

6 section 195 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended by striking paragraph (3). 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred in tax10 able years beginning after December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

89–006 

" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

111TH CONGRESS

1st Session 

REPORT

2009

111–371 

House Calendar No. 142 

IN THE MATTER OF MARC GOLDBERG 

R E P O R T 

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF 

OFFICIAL CONDUCT 

DECEMBER 10, 2009.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with HEARING

(III)

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT, 

Washington, DC, December 10, 2009. 

Hon. LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk, House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MS. MILLER: In accordance with Rule 18(e)(2) of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, the Committee hereby 

submits the attached report to the House of Representatives. 

Sincerely, 

ZOE LOFGREN, 

Chair. 

JO BONNER, 

Ranking Republican 

Member. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with HEARING

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with HEARING

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–371 

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT 

IN THE MATTER OF MARC GOLDBERG 

DECEMBER 10, 2009 

Ms. LOFGREN, from the Committee on Standards of Official 

Conduct, submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

I. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION 

In accordance with rule 18(e)(2) of the Committee on Standards 

of Official Conduct, the Committee hereby submits the following 

Report to the House of Representatives: 

On December 8, 2009, the Committee convened for the purpose 

of considering the charge issued against Marc Philip Goldberg on 

August 14, 2009, of simple assault. Mr. Goldberg was convicted of 

simple assault on October 16, 2009, and sentenced to a 45 day suspended sentence and placed on supervised probation for one year. 

Mr. Goldberg was also fined $700.00 and required to complete substance abuse treatment and testing, an anger management class, 

and 120 hours of community service. Mr. Goldberg has paid the 

$700.00 fine and is complying with the terms of his sentence. 

The Committee voted against empanelling an investigative subcommittee regarding this matter. The Committee considered the 

scope and nature of Mr. Goldberg’s conduct, and the fine and criminal disposition ordered by the D.C. Superior Court. The Committee 

has determined not to initiate review by an investigative subcommittee in this matter. 

II. STATEMENT UNDER RULE 13, CLAUSE 3(c) OF THE 

RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

The Committee made no special oversight findings in this report. 

No budget statement is submitted. No funding is authorized by any 

measure in this report. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with HEARING
No. 46497.

#### Protest 67173-K of A. D. Cohen Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with the analyst’s report that these hats are not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1976 

To authorize educational assistance under the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship program for pursuit of advanced degrees in physical 

therapy and occupational therapy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2011 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Mr. COONS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize educational assistance under the Armed Forces 

Health Professions Scholarship program for pursuit of 

advanced degrees in physical therapy and occupational 

therapy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1976 IS

1 SECTION 1. EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR ADVANCED 

2 DEGREES IN PHYSICAL THERAPY AND OCCU3 PATIONAL THERAPY UNDER THE ARMED 

4 FORCES HEALTH PROFESSIONS SCHOLAR5 SHIP PROGRAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with guidance 

7 issued by the Secretary of Defense for purposes of this 

8 section, assistance under the Armed Forces Health Pro9 fessions Scholarship program under subchapter I of chap10 ter 105 of title 10, United States Code, shall be available 

11 for pursuit of a master’s degree and a doctoral degree in 

12 the disciplines as follows: 

13 (1) Physical therapy. 

14 (2) Occupational therapy. 

15 (b) TERMINATION.—The guidance under subsection 

16 (a) shall provide that the availability of assistance as de17 scribed in that subsection for pursuit of a degree in a dis18 cipline covered by that subsection shall cease when the 

19 Secretary certifies to Congress that there no longer exists 

20 a current or projected shortfall in qualified personnel in 

21 that discipline in either of the following: 

22 (1) The military departments. 

23 (2) Any major military medical treatment facil24 ity specializing in the rehabilitation of wounded 

25 members of the Armed Forces. 

26 (c) SUNSET.— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1976 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The authority to commence 

2 the provision of assistance under this section shall 

3 expire on the date that is two years after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act, if not terminated ear5 lier in accordance with subsection (b). 

6 (2) CONTINUATION OF ONGOING ASSISTANCE.— 

7 Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to ter8 minate the provision of assistance under this section 

9 after the date specified in paragraph (1) to persons 

10 provided assistance under this section before or as of 

11 such date. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS