alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.b

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Theodore Misiewicz, in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
|   | Date: June 2, 2006 |  

*/s/ Theodore Misiewicz***            |
|--------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |               | Theodore Misiewicz, Chief Financial Officer** |

 

 

 

1
No. 96-5678.

#### Marcum *v.*McAninch, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 177 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire the Gold Hill Ranch 

in Coloma, California. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire the 

Gold Hill Ranch in Coloma, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Hill-Wakamatsu 

5 Preservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) GOLD HILL RANCH.—The term ‘‘Gold Hill 

9 Ranch’’ means the approximately 272 acres of land 

10 located in Coloma, California, as generally depicted 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 177 IS

1 on the map entitled ‘‘Gold Hill–Wakamatsu Site’’ 

2 and dated May 7, 2009. 

3 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

4 the Secretary of the Interior. 

5 SEC. 3. GOLD HILL RANCH. 

6 (a) ACQUISITION.—The Secretary may acquire the 

7 Gold Hill Ranch, including any interest in the Gold Hill 

8 Ranch, by purchase from a willing seller with donated or 

9 appropriated funds, donation, or exchange. 

10 (b) MANAGEMENT.—The Secretary shall manage any 

11 land or interest in land acquired under subsection (a) in 

12 accordance with— 

13 (1) this Act; 

14 (2) the Federal Land Policy and Management 

15 Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and 

16 (3) any other applicable laws. 

17 (c) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.— 

18 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter 

19 into a cooperative agreement with public or non20 profit entities to interpret the history of the 

21 Wakamatsu Tea and Silk Farm Colony and related 

22 pioneer history associated with Japanese immigra23 tion to the area, including the history of traditional 

24 Japanese crops and farming practices and the conVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:26 Feb 01, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S177.IS S177

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 177 IS

1 tribution of those practices to the agricultural econ2 omy of the State of California. 

3 (2) INCLUSIONS.—The cooperative agreement 

4 referred to in paragraph (1) may include provisions 

5 for the design and development of a visitor center to 

6 further public education and interpretation of the 

7 Gold Hill Ranch. 

8 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

9 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

10 as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Wm. P. Goldman & Bros., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6599.

Entry No. 701862.

Invoice dated Manchester, England.

Certified May 21, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 9, 1941.

(Decided December 11, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Consumer Product SAFETY ALERT

FROM THE US. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C.20207

Bicycle Safety Is No Accident

Each year, there are about 800 bicycle-related However, not all bicycle-related injuries and

deaths in the U.S. and another half a million deaths can be addressed by the use of safety

bicycle-related injuries treated in the nation’s equipment alone. Rider actions and reactions -

hospital emergency rooms. The U.S. Consumer especially obeying traffic laws - play a major role

Product Safety Commission encourages bike in contributing to injury-free bicycling enjoyment.

riders of all ages to use helmets. Studies have

shown that using bike helmets can reduce head

injuries by up to 85 percent.

10 SMART ROUTES TO BICYCLE SAFETY

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Protect Your Head . . . Wear a Helmet.

See and Be Seen . . . Wear Bright Colors or

Reflective Stripes.

Avoid Biking at Night.

Stay Alert . . . Keep a Lookout for Obstacles

in Your Path.

Go with the Flow. . . Ride WITH Traffic.

Check for Traffic. . . Be Aware of Traffic Around

You. (Intersections, Driveways).

Learn Rules of the Road . . . Obey Traffic Laws.

Assure Bicycle Readiness . . . Is Your Bicycle

Properly Adjusted?

Can You Stop It?. . . Check Brakes Before

Check Your Wheels . . . “Quick Release”

Wheels Should Be Securely Fastened.

Riding.

For more information on bicycle safety, write the

U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission,

Washington, DC 20207.

009807
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should

not e published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth

in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40986

Summary Calendar

JAMES STEWART,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

HARTFORD LIFE & ACCIDENT

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:00-CV-419

May 16, 2002

Before POLITZ, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James Stewart appeals an adverse summary judgment rejecting his claims under

the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. He contends that the district1 M editrust Fin. Servs. v. Sterling Chems., Inc.

, 168 F.3d 211, 214 (5th Cir.

1999); Duhon v. Texaco, Inc. , 15 F.3d 1302, 1306-08 (5th Cir. 1994).

2 court erred in

holding that the Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company acted

within its discretion in terminating his disability benefits.

Stewart’s suit agai nst Hartford alleges that he had been an employee of WalMar t Stores and that he had applied for and received disability insurance benefits

provided by Hartford following an injury. He claims that after initially honoring his

claim for disability benefits Hartford wrongfully terminated those payments. Finding

that Hartford had not abused its discretion in determining that Stewart was not disabled,

the district court granted summary judgment dismissing Stewart’s claims. Our review

of the record persu ades beyond peradventure that Stewart has failed to demonstrate that

Hartford abused its discretion in determining that he was not disabled under the subject

disability plan. 1

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THERMEDICS INC.'S
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 1,2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                                 22,337
<SECURITIES>                                           12,160
<RECEIVABLES>                                          63,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                            4,909
<INVENTORY>                                            42,992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      268,694
<PP&E>                                                 38,780
<DEPRECIATION>                                         25,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        441,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 115,275
<BONDS>                                                47,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                4,200
<OTHER-SE>                                            229,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          441,809
<SALES>                                               223,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      223,503
<CGS>                                                 123,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         123,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       15,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        1,795
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      2,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        20,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                            7,343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    10,578
<DISCONTINUED>                                        (23,799)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (13,221)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.31)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,  Bode Xu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 10, 2011





/s/ Bode XuBode Xu, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Distribution Employee Spotlight-Stan Hemler

By Ed Shank, DLA Distribution Public Affairs

Stan Hemler, sign painter at Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Susquehanna, measures the spot where he will place vinyl lettering for a recycling bin sign. For a video that tells more about Hemler’s role in supporting DLA Distribution click the thumbnail below.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionDLA Distribution Susquehanna
#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6891.

Entry No. 714535, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, July 14, 1941, etc.

Certified July 25, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 25, 1941, etc.

(Decided February 18, 1947)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 *396C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importers on entries because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                  247
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                             483
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         43
<PP&E>                                  440
<DEPRECIATION>                         (189)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   124
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                174
<OTHER-SE>                              726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1024
<SALES>                                 280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        280
<CGS>                                   135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          2332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (2488)
<INCOME-TAX>                              5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (2493)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          (2493)
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.16


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

November 12, 1942

No. 47718.

#### Protest 85588-K of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the brushes in question are similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Heinrich Herrmann & Weiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30), the claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1506 was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

April 22, 1942

No. 47110.

#### Protest 39381-K of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of Rockingham earthenware similar to that the subject of *Butler Bros.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

I, Peter T. Kissinger, the Chairman of the Board; President; and Chief Executive
Officer of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., certify that (i) Amendment No. 2 to
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2003, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of the dates and for
the periods set forth therein.

| | /s/  Peter T. Kissinger
Peter T. Kissinger
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer
February 24, 2005
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Michael R. Cox, the Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., certify that (i) Amendment No. 2 to
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2003, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of the dates and for
the periods set forth therein.

| | /s/  Michael R. Cox
Michael R. Cox
Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
February 24, 2005
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1613-07

ROBERT WALKER FISCHER, Appellant

v.

 THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF

CASE 04-05-00834-CR OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS,

BEXAR COUNTY

WOMACK, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which MEYERS, J., joined.

It seems to me that evidence of the appellant’s access to the murder weapon was a

relevant fact of this offense, and that analyzing it as evidence of an “extraneous offense”

is unnecessary. The Court disagrees; see ante at 7 n. 7. Therefore I concur only in its

judgment.

Filed October 29, 2008.

Publish.
# C_2015016EN.01001201.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/12

---

Order of the Court of 21 October 2014 — Mundipharma GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), AFT Pharmaceuticals Ltd

(Case C-669/13 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Application for registration of word mark Maxigesic - Opposition of the proprietor of the earlier word mark OXYGESIC - Refusal of registration)

(2015/C 016/17)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Mundipharma GmbH (represented by: F. Nielsen, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for the Harminisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent), AFT Pharmaceuticals Ltd (represented by: N. Nentwig, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mundipharma GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mundipharma GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 85, 22.3.2014.

---
# C_2014409EN.01003101.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/31

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 August 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia supported by: Federal Republic of Germany, Kingdom of Belgium, Kingdom of the Netherlands, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Republic of Poland, Republic of Finland, Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-240/13) (1)

1

2014/C 409/43

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

1

---
1 

### Whalen, Marilyn

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 4:23 PM

To: Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.haw aii.gov); roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov

Cc: stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov; Pallarino, Bob; Linder,

Steven; Lovgren, Andrew C LCDR, NAVSU P FLCPH C700; Shimabuku, June T. CIV

NAVFAC HI, EV4; Tsutsui, Br uce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; Kishaba, Raelynn I CIV

NAVFAC HI, EV4; Mizuno, Arl een M CIV NAVFAC HI, PRJ412

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - April 28, 2015

Signed By: aaron.poentis@navy.mil

Importance: High

Aaron

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of April 28, 2015. In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be

annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan

Action complete.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1

‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation

of release point(s) within Tank 5.

Action complete.

b. Action 2

‐ The rate of vertical migration for the released JP

‐ 8 free product is unknown. Information from the

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration. This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination. Prepare models for petroleum JP

‐ 8 releases of 10,000,

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5.

No change.

c. Action 3

‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP

‐ 8 free product. Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.

No change.

d. Action 4

‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex. This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.

d.(1) Groundwater Monitoring Wells

No change.

d.(2) Site Characterization2 No change.

d.(3) AOC/SOW

Discussions are ongoing.

d.(4) Request for Additional Information

No change.

d.(5) BWS/USGS Groundwater Flow Study

USGS installed groundwater level monitoring instruments in two (2) outside tunnel wells. Installation in a third outside

tunnel well will be completed by the end of the week. Water levels will be monitored for about one month.

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

V/r,

Aaron