# C_2013026EN.01006201.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/62

---

Action brought on 19 November 2012 — Ferring v OHIM — Tillotts Pharma (OCTASA)

(Case T-502/12)

2013/C 26/122

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ferring BV (Haarlem, Netherlands) (represented by: I. Fowler, Solicitor, A. Renck and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tillotts Pharma AG (Ziefen, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 September 2012 in case R 1216/2011-4; and. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 September 2012 in case R 1216/2011-4; and.

| — | Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the Defendant, or — in the event that the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal intervenes on the side of the Defendant — that they be borne jointly by the Defendant and the Intervener. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the Defendant, or — in the event that the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal intervenes on the side of the Defendant — that they be borne jointly by the Defendant and the Intervener.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘OCTASA’, for goods in class 5 — Community trade mark application No 8169881

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Benelux trade mark registration No 377513 for the word mark ‘PENTASA’, for among others goods in class 5; German trade mark registration No 1181393 for the word mark ‘PENTASA’, for goods in class 5; Portuguese trade mark registration No 218845 for the word mark ‘PENTASA’, for goods in class 5; Danish trade mark registration No VR 02.430 1980 for the word mark ‘PENTASA’, for goods in class 5; Finnish trade mark registration No 94367 for the word mark ‘PENTASA’, for goods in class 5; UK trade mark registration No 1131049 for the word mark ‘PENTASA’, for goods in class 5; Spanish trade mark registration No 1766091 for the word mark ‘PENTASA’, for goods in class 5; International trade mark registration No 605880 for the word mark ‘PENTASA’, for goods in class 5; Benelux trade mark registration No 430245 for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5; German trade mark registration No 2024737 for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5; Finnish trade mark registration No 95782 for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5; French trade mark registration No 1537576 for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5; UK trade mark registration No 1262052 for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5; Greek trade mark registration No 129507-A for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5; Irish trade mark registration No 175341 for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5; Portuguese trade mark registration No 246194 for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5; Danish trade mark registration No VR 198601124 for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5; Swedish trade mark registration No 2000103 for the word mark ‘OCTOSTIM’, for goods in class 5

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Council Regulation No 207/2009

| — | Infringement of Rule 80(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 80(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95.

---