alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees at Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) in Apollo, Pennsylvania, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On November 29, 2007, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) employees who were monitored or should have been monitored for exposure to ionizing radiation while working at the Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation (NUMEC) in Apollo, Pennsylvania from January 1, 1957, through December 31, 1983, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

                        This designation became effective on December 29, 2007, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                        (14)(C). Hence, beginning on December 29, 2007, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV*.                     

Dated: January 15, 2008. 

John Howard, 

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

 [FR Doc. E8-1018 Filed 1-22-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160-17-P
### RE : D oes D unn E d w a r ds m ake sand i ng sea l e r s

- 240 g /

l? R obe r t W endo ll to: S tan l e y T ong 11 / 03 / 2011 02 : 57 PM Hi s t o r y: Th i s m e ss age ha s been r ep li ed t o.



### H e ll o , St an --
W e don ' t happen t o m a k e a s and i n g s ea l e r a t 240 g / L f o r s hop

- c oa t i n g i n V en t u r a . O u r on l y s and i n g s ea l e r s a r e i n ou r La c q ue r li ne f o r a r c h i t e c t u r a l u s e , s ub j e c t t o a li m i t o f 275 g / L.

R e g a r d s, 

# RW

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robe r t W endo ll | D i r e c to r o f E n vi r on m enta l A ff a i rs D unn -E d w a r d s C o r po r a t ion

F ro m : T o ng

. S ta n l e y@ e p ama il. e p a .gov [m a il t o: T o ng

. S ta n l e y@ e p ama il. e p a .gov ] S e n t : Thu rsd ay , N o v em b e r 03
, 2011 9:17 AM To : R ob e r t

W e n doll Su b j e c t : D o e s Dunn E d wa rds ma k e s a n di n g s ea l e rs - 240

g / l?

Robe r t,

I'm c ompa r i ng S outh Coa s t, V entu r a, and S an J oaqu i n' s r u l e s fo r wood p r odu c t s c oat i ng s and found V entu r a ha s a s and i ng s ea l e r li m i t of 240 g/ l wh il e S an J oaqu i n and S outh Coa s t' s li m i t i s 275 g/ l.

Doe s Dunn E dwa r

d s ma rk et s and i ng s ea l e rs < 240 g/ l ? I'm e v a l uat

i ng i f we s hou l d r

e c ommend that S an J oaqu i n l owe r i t

s s and i ng s ea l e r li m i t. I'm to l d S he r w i n W illi am s ma k e s s u c h a p r odu ct 

### h tt p :// www

. s he rw i n -w illi a m s

. c o m /

g r een s u r e / p r odu c t

- fi n i s he s/

T han ks.

S tan

S tan l e y T ong U. S

. EPA Reg i on IX Ru l e s O ff

i c e ( A IR

- 4) 75 Hawtho r ne S t. S an Fr an c i sc o, C A 94105

415

- 947

- 4122 -v o i ce 415

- 947

- 3579

- fax



### This email and any attachments contain confidential and privileged information belonging to the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy, distribute, or use any such information. If this email has been sent to you in error, please reply to inform the sender of the error and

### then delete this email and any attachments

.
No. 74-728.

#### Franks et al. *v.*Bowman Transportation Co., Inc., et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1719 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1719

To clarify that schools and local educational agencies participating in 
 the school lunch program under the Richard B. Russell National School 
 Lunch Act are authorized to donate excess food to local food banks or 
                       charitable organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2011

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify that schools and local educational agencies participating in 
 the school lunch program under the Richard B. Russell National School 
 Lunch Act are authorized to donate excess food to local food banks or 
                       charitable organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``School Food Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. FOOD DONATION PROGRAM.

    Section 9 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 
U.S.C. 1758) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(l) Food Donation Program.--
            ``(1) In general.--Each school and local educational agency 
        participating in the school lunch program under this Act may 
        donate any food not consumed under such program to eligible 
        local food banks or charitable organizations.
            ``(2) Guidance.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Not later than 180 days after 
                the date of the enactment of this subsection, the 
                Secretary shall develop and publish guidance to schools 
                and local educational agencies participating in the 
                school lunch program under this Act to assist such 
                schools and local educational agencies in donating food 
                under this subsection.
                    ``(B) Updates.--The Secretary shall update such 
                guidance as necessary.
            ``(3) Liability.--Any school or local educational agency 
        making donations pursuant to this subsection shall be exempt 
        from civil and criminal liability to the extent provided under 
        the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1791).
            ``(4) Definition.--In this subsection, the term `eligible 
        local food banks or charitable organizations' means any food 
        bank or charitable organization which is exempt from tax under 
        section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 
        U.S.C. 501(c)(3)).''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 20 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 20

 To protect American job creation by striking the job-killing Federal 
                           employer mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. 
   Risch, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Burr, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
Portman, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Enzi, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Roberts, 
Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Coats, Mr. Blunt, Mr. McCain, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Corker, 
and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To protect American job creation by striking the job-killing Federal 
                           employer mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Job Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECT JOB CREATION.

    Sections 1513 and 1514 and subsections (e), (f), and (g) of section 
10106 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (and the 
amendments made by such sections and subsections) are repealed and the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if 
such provisions and amendments had never been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014184EN.01002402.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/24

---

Order of the President of the Court of 20 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia — Romania) — Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice a Judeţului Sibiu — Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală v Cătălin Ienciu

(Case C-313/13) (1)

1

2014/C 184/38

Language of the case: Romanian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.

1

---
| Dated: |         November 5, 2008 |   | /s/      Mel Switzer, Jr.                                                         |
|--------|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                               |   | Mel      Switzer, Jr.                                                             |
|   |                               |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer                                        |
|   |                               |   |          ( Principal Executive Officer)                       |
|   |                               |   |                                                                              |
| Dated: | November      5, 2008              |   | /s/      Mary Dieter Smith                                                        |
|   |                               |   | Mary      Dieter Smith                                                            |
|   |                               |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                         |
|   |                               |   | (Principal      Financial Officer and Principal  Accounting    Officer) |

----
89–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–418 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 4626) TO RESTORE 

THE APPLICATION OF THE FEDERAL ANTITRUST LAWS TO THE BUSINESS OF HEALTH INSURANCE TO PROTECT COMPETITION AND CONSUMERS 

FEBRUARY 23, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1098] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1098, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4626, the 

‘‘Health Insurance Industry Fair Competition Act,’’ under a closed 

rule. The resolution provides two hours of debate equally divided 

and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on the Judiciary. The resolution waives all points of 

order against consideration of the bill except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that the bill 

shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of 

order against the bill. This waiver does not affect the point of order 

available under clause 9 of rule XXI (regarding earmark disclosure). Finally, the resolution provides one motion to recommit with 

or without instructions. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the bill (except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 

XXI), the Committee is not aware of any points of order. The waiver is prophylactic. Although the resolution waives all points of 

order against the bill, the Committee is not aware of any points of 

order against the bill. The waiver of all points of order against the 

bill is prophylactic. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with REPORTS
2 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 311 

Date: February 23, 2010. 

Measure: H.R. 4626. 

Motion by: Mr. Dreier. 

Summary of motion: To make in order an amendment by Rep. 

Lungren (CA), #1, which would allow the sharing of historical loss 

data and actuarial services among health insurance companies, as 

modified by striking all references to medical malpractice insurance 

in the amendment. 

Results: Defeated 3–7. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Hastings (FL)—Nay; Matsui—Nay; Perlmutter—Nay; Pingree—Nay; Polis—Nay; Dreier— 

Yea; Diaz-Balart, L.—Yea; Foxx—Yea; Slaughter—Nay. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with REPORTS
#### OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, v. Charles Ellis STEELE, Respondent.

No. 311 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Oct. 28, 1998.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 1998, there having been filed with this Court by Charles Ellis Steele his verified Statement of Resignation dated August 10, 1998, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa. R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Charles Ellis Steele be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania retroactive to April 12, 1997; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
NOAA Technical Memorandum OAR PMEL-143

TSUNAMETER NETWORK DESIGN FOR THE U.S. DART®

ARRAYS IN THE PACIFIC AND ATLANTIC OCEANS

Michael C. Spillane, Edison Gica, Vasily V. Titov, and Harold O. Mofjeld

Front Matter through Section 5

Section 6 (specific details on individual sites)

Section 7 through end

Click on links below:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001057725
<NAME>                        Neff Corp.

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            3,374
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     56,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2,904
<INVENTORY>                                       3,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<PP&E>                                            398,954
<DEPRECIATION>                                    87,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    471,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
<BONDS>                                           336,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          212
<OTHER-SE>                                        103,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      471,706
<SALES>                                           392,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  392,011
<CGS>                                             100,871
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     252,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2,317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                39,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   10,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (3,877)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4,854
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4,854
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22



</TABLE>
# C_2014409EN.01002301.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/23

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2014 — Associação de Empresas de Construção e Obras Públicas e Serviços (Aecops) v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-379/13 P to C-381/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Decision 83/673/EEC - Regulation (EEC) No 2950/83 - European Social Fund - Training operations - Reduction of the financial assistance initially granted - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Protection of the European Communities’ financial interests))

2014/C 409/32

Language of the cases: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Associação de Empresas de Construção e Obras Públicas e Serviços (Aecops) (represented by: L. Pinto Monteiro and N. Morais Sarmento, advogados)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and P. Guerra e Andrade, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeals are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeals are dismissed.

| 2. | Associação de Empresas de Construção e Obras Públicas e Serviços (Aecops) shall bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Associação de Empresas de Construção e Obras Públicas e Serviços (Aecops) shall bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6750
MOYA MOORE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, on relation of James E. Long, Commissioner of Insurance of North Carolina, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-457-5-HC-F) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Moya Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Moore v. State of South Carolina , No. CA-95-457-5-HC-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 16, 1996). Furthermore, we deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
USGSHomeContactUSGSSearchUSGS

Data Series 478
No. 54395.

#### Consumers Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 148493-K (New York).

*493Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mandarin oil similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fritzsche Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Urban DAPPEMONT.

No. 98-KK-1118.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 98KW-0446; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 393-312.

Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit for briefing, argument and full opinion (unless waived by defendant).

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.
#### HEEMSOTH KERNER CORP. *v.*UNITED STATES

No. 6601.

Entry Nos. 759471; 760086.

Invoices dated Bury, England, April 11, 1946, etc.

Certified April 15,1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 8, 1946, etc.

(Decided December 11, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

An agreed set of facts, submitting these cases, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.