alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 76-5517.

#### Bury *v.*Florida Department of Commerce et al.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


     I, Patrick D. O'Brien, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 of American Oil & Gas, Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

     5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 16, 2004
/s/ Patrick D. O'Brien
----------------------
Patrick D. O'Brien
Chief Executive Officer
No. 48870.

#### Protests 54193-K, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The record disclosed that said pencil sharpeners are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 41633, which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA 60th Anniversary: In their own words

By DLA Distribution Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
John Webber, Jr., DLA Distribution, DLA 60th AnniversaryAn inquisition or a job interview? Hear John Webber, Jr. share his story on how he came to work for DLA and stay for decades. To see the full interview and for more information about DLA's history visit: https://www.dla.mil/About-DLA/History/60th-Anniversary/

02:14VIDEO  | 02:14 |Short Story, John Webber, Jr., DLA Distribution, DLA 60th Anniversary

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADistributionDLA 60th AnniversaryDLA 60th Anniversary DistributionInterview
Exhibit
      10.2

    


    AMENDMENT
      NUMBER 1 TO 

    CONVERTIBLE
      DEBENTURE

    


     THIS
      AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the
      “Amendment”) is
      entered into as of January 14, 2008, between TRIANGLE
      PETROLEUM CORPORATION., a
      corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada (the
      “Company”),
      and
CENTRUM
      BANK AG (the
      “Investor”).

    


    WHEREAS,
      the
      Investor is the registered holder of a convertible debenture with a Maturity
      Date of [        ], in the initial principal
      amount of $2,500,000 (the “Debenture”); and

     

    WHEREAS,
      the
      parties wish to amend the Maturity Date, as such term is defined in the
      Debenture. 

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE,
      it is
      agreed: 

     

    I. Amendments.

     

    The
      Maturity Date of the Debenture is hereby amended to June 1, 2009.

     

    II. Miscellaneous.

    


    
      	 	
              A.

            	
              Except
                as provided hereinabove, all of the terms and conditions contained
                in the
                Debenture shall remain unchanged and in full force and
                effect.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              B.

            	
              All
                capitalized but not defined terms used herein shall have those meanings
                ascribed to them in the Agreement.

            


      	 	 	 


      	 	D.	All provisions in the Debenture and any amendments,
              schedules or exhibits thereto in conflict with this Amendment shall
              be and
              hereby are changed to conform to this
              Amendment.


    

    


     

     

    [REMAINDER
      OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

     

    
      
         

      

      
         

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by the undersigned,
      thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first set forth above.

     

    


    
      	 	
              COMPANY:

            
	 	
              TRIANGLE
                PETROLEUM CORPORATION

            
	 	 
	 	
              By: ________________________

            
	 	
              Name Mark
                Gustafson

            
	 	
              Title: President
                & CEO

            
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
              CENTRUM
                BANK AG

            
	 	 
	 	
              By: ________________________

            
	 	
              Name 

            
	 	
              Title:
Snntn Ma m 

All-America Qty 

lllll f 

:-'rPARTMENTOF 

:^"V^'SPORTATION 

;--^T OPERATIONS 

i^OOCT - I A '0:2 1 

CITY OF SANTA MARJA 

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 

AND CITY COUNCIL 

I i n EAST COOK STREET. ROOM ^ \ -SANT A MARIA. CA y.>4M-5l'J() - KDS-yJS-fWSI • FAX S05-."H'>-O6.'i7 • www.ci..<;.inta-inaria.ca.iis 

August 23, 2010 

Susan Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation & International Affairs, X-1 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W88-324 

Washington. DC 20590 

Dear Ms. Kurland: 

It has come to my attention that the Santa Maria Public Airport District is pursuing 

an extension of air service to Denver, Colorado. As Mayor of the City of Santa 

Maria, I speak for the City Council In saying that the Council is in full support of 

this added service, which will benefit both the airlines and our City. 

Santa Maria is the largest and fastest growing City on the Central California 

Coast. We are in an excellent position to add and develop new companies and 

provide for fiiture industrial growth. The added air service would allow our 

business leaders, as well as all of our residents, to travel directly to Denver and 

connect to other flights. It wilt also provide the opportunity for more people to 

come to our City and diBcover all that Santa Mana has to offer. We have 

exceptional resources, recreational facilities and cx^mmunity events ttiat enhance 

the quali^ of life far residents and provide leisure and entertainment for visitors. 

Santa Maria's central location makes it a destination spot for tourism, with an 

unlmiited number of attractions and activities within a very close distance. There 

Is no doubt thai Skywest Afrlines will see au incr^aise of ridership by providing the 

additk)nal service. 

The City of Santa Maria fully endorses the Sar ^ Maria Public Airport Dfetrict's 

effort and stands ready to welcome the new air sen/ice. 

Sincerely, 

LARRY |(AVAGN1N 0 

Mayor
Case No. 14,047.

#### TILLEY v. THARP.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 290.] 3

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May, 1828.

Pleading at Law — Misnomer — Practice — Special Bail.

Upon a motion to appear without bail because the-affidavit to the plaintiff's account by mistake of the attorney who wrote it, named the defendant .Tames instead of William; the court took time to consider till the next day, when the mistake was corrected.

The declaration and the account filed were against William Tharp, but the affidavit at the foot of the account was against James Tharp.

Mr. Beale, for defendant,

offered to appear without bail.

R. P. Dunlop, for plaintiff,

said it was his mistake in writing the affidavit, and he would have it amended to-morrow.

THE COURT

(nem. con.) said they would consider until to-morrow, to give the plaintiff's counsel an opportunity to correct the mistake, when it was corrected and the defendant ruled to give special bail.
EXHIBIT 99.12




DANIEL A. LABINE
 c/o Rubicon Minerals Corporation
 P.O. Box 274,
 103 McMarmac Road,
 Cochenour, Ontario, Canada
 P0V 1L0
 Phone: 1-807-662-7026
 
 
 CONSENT
 
 
 March 27, 2015
 
 Rubicon Minerals Corporation
 44 Victoria Street, Suite 400
 Toronto, Ontario
 Canada M5C 1Y2
 
 And
 
 United States Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 
 Dear Sirs/Mesdames:
 
 I hereby consent to being named in the Annual Information Form of the Company, dated March 27, 2015 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “AIF”) and to the use of the technical information prepared by me or under my supervision relating to the Company’s Red Lake properties, which information is contained in the AIF and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
 
 I also consent to the incorporation by reference of the above information into Rubicon Minerals Corporation’s Registration Statement (No. 333-194076) on Form F-10.
 
 
 
 Sincerely,
 
 /s/ Daniel A. Labine
 
 Daniel A. Labine,P.Eng
 Vice President of Operations
 Rubicon Minerals Corporation
CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on form 10-QSB of Futomic
Industries, Inc. for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, I, Francisco
Schipperheijn, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Futomic
Industries, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:  1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Futomic Industries, Inc.  Dated: August 22, 2005  FUTOMIC INDUSTRIES, INC.  By:
/s/ Francisco Schipperheijn Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 74-6024.

#### Epperson *v.*Gunn, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 24, 2024

.

________________

No. 3D22

- 1404

Lower Tribunal No. B22

- 14816

________________



### City of Miami Beach

, Appellant,

vs.



### Adalberto Cosme

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami

- Dade County, Robin W.

Faber , Judge.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant

Attorney General; Rafael A. Paz, City Attorney

, and Robert F. Rosenwald,

Jr., Chief Deputy City Attorney, and Woody Clermont, Assistant City

Attorney, for appellant.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant

Public Defender , for appellee.

Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER , JJ.2 On Motion for Rehearing or Clarification

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration, the Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing or

Clarification, and Corrected Motion for Rehearing or Clarification are hereby

denied. The Appellant’s Response is noted.

SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.3 City of Miami Beach v. Adalberto Cosme

Case No. 3D22

- 1404

MILLER, J., dissenting from the denial of rehearing or clarification.

I respectfully dissent from the denial of rehearing or clarification. In

reversing the case on due process grounds, the majority relies upon an

argument advanced by the State for the first time in the reply brief. As

appellee c orrectly argues, this course of action constitutes a sharp

departure from established tenets of appellate law. See Hoskins v. State

,

75 So. 3d 250, 257 (Fla. 2011) (barring issue not raised in initial brief);

Gen. Mortg. Assocs., Inc. v. Campolo Realty & Mortg. Corp.

, 678 So. 2d

431, 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (“The fact that this issue was raised for the

first time in the reply brief alone precludes our consideration of the

matter.”); Land v. Fla. Dep’t of Corr.

, 181 So. 3d 1252, 1254 (Fla. 1st DCA

2015) (“[T]his court is unable to entertain appellants’ argument

. . . which

they failed to raise in their initial brief.”); Plichta v. Plichta , 899 So. 2d 1283,

1287 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ( “Issues raised on appeal for the first time in a

reply brief are not properly before this court and will not be considered.”).

Accordingly, in my view, lack of preservation should have doomed this

appeal to fail ure.
#### S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc., a/c Medana Watch Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 7769.

Entry No. 730690, etc.

(Decided January 5, 1950)

*James W. Bevans (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawkence, Judge:

It bas been agreed between tbe parties hereto tbat tbe. issues herein relating to tbe mercbandise tbe subject of these appeals are tbe same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming tbe judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and tbat tbe record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon tbe agreed facts, I find tbat tbe attempted appraisement embodied in tbe second return of value by tbe appraiser of themerchan-dise covered by each of tbe appeals for reappraisement enumerated in tbe annexed schedule, which is marked “A” and made a part of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and tbat tbe appraiser’s original return of value in each case, as reported by him to tbe collector *502of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### STATE ex rel. Jorge RODRIGUEZ v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 97-KH-3160.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Rodriguez, Jorge;- — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 287-297; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97KW-2094.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.
Case No. 9,339.

#### MAYE v. CARBERY.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 336.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Oct. Term, 1822.

Trial — Notice to Phoduce Papers— Judgment by Default — Evidence—Whitten Instrument— Secondary Affidavit.

1. Judgment by default, for not producing at the trial a paper which the defendant has been notified to produce, cannot be rendered unless there is a previous order of the court to produce it, founded upon a motion and notice.

[Cited in Gregory v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., 10 Fed. 530.]

[See Bank of U. S. v. Kurtz, Case No. 920; Bas v. Steele, Id. 1,088.]

2. Before secondary evidence of a written instrument can be given, the court must be satisfied by the affidavit of the party offering it. or otherwise, that the supposed original paper did once exist, and that it is not in his power to produce it.

Replevin. Rent arrear, and issue.

The plaintiff, having given notice to the defendant to produce the original, offered to read in evidence to the jury, a copy of a paper in the handwriting of the deceased subscribing witness.

Mr. Taney, for defendant,

objected; stating that his client had not the original.

THE COURT

(nem. eon.) decided that the plaintiff was not entitled to judgment by default. under the 15th section of the judiciary act of 1789 (1 Stat. 73), because he had not given notice of a motion to the court for an order to compel the defendant to produce the paper. And that the plaintiff must lay the foundation for his secondary evidence, by satisfying the court by his own affidavit, or otherwise, that the original once existed, and that it was not in his power to produce it.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ PRINTING TEXTILES, LLC, dba Berger Textiles, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2023

- 1576

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:23

- cv

- 00056

- TCS

, Senior Judge Timothy C. Stanceu.

______________________ O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is Case: 23-1576 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2023P RINTING T EXTILES , LLC V

. US 2

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

FO R THE COURT

June 15, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Date Jarrett B. Perlow Acting Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 15, 2023 Case: 23-1576 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 06/15/2023
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-199]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Renegotiation Board Interest Rate; Prompt Payment Interest Rate; 
Contract Dispute Act

    Although the Renegotiation Board is no longer in existence, other 
Federal Agencies are required to use interest rates computed under the 
criteria established by the Renegotiation Act of 1971 (P.L. 92-41). For 
example, the Contract Dispute Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-563) and the Prompt 
Payment Act (P.L. 97-177) provide for the calculation of interest due 
on claims at a rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury 
pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97) for the Renegotiation Board 
(31 U.S.C. 3902).
    Therefore, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the above 
mentioned sections, the Secretary of the Treasury has determined that 
the rate of interest applicable for the purpose of said sections, for 
the period beginning January 1, 1997 and ending on June 30, 1997, is 
6\3/8\ percentum per annum.

    Dated: December 27, 1996.
Donald V. Hammond,
Deputy Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-199 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
No. 46505.

#### Protest 23329-K of F. W. Woolworth Co. (Baltimore).

*304Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the figures in question are in chief value of earthy or mineral substances, decorated. In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 214 was sustained.