alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Alamosa Holdings, Inc. (the"Company") for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David E. Sharbutt, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

    

/s/    David E.Sharbutt                                

Name:    DavidE. Sharbutt Title:      Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer Date:      November 9, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filedby the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended.

----
Before the Third Division,

April 21, 1943

No. 48220.

#### Protests 42619-K, etc., of Camilla Lucas (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the etchings in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Camilla Lucas*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 359, C. D. 712). In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 as claimed.
# C_2015016EN.01001001.xml

| 19.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/10

---

Order of the Court of 22 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Elcogás SA v Administración del Estado, Iberdrola SA

(Case C-275/13) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Concept of State intervention or through State resources - Companies which own electricity generating plants - Extraordinary financing)

(2015/C 016/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elcogás SA

Defendant: Administracion del Estado, Iberdrola SA

Operative part of the order

Article 107(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the sums allocated to a private undertaking producing electricity which are financed by all end users of electricity in the national territory and which are distributed to undertakings in the electricity sector by a public body in accordance with predetermined legal criteria constitute aid granted by a Member State or through State resources.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.

---
# I ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 24-0006

IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON UNIFORM BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER ORDER

J. Bart Denham has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar of Montana pursuant to Rule IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certifiedthat Denham hasprovidedthe necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission under Rule IV ofthe Rules for Admission to the State Bar ofMontana. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, J. Bart Denham may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this

# Ie day ofJune, 2024.



# ELF.D JUN 18 2024 Bowen GrE:enwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ChiefJustice



# (-e r-v(-L„ 06/18/2024

Case Number: PR 24-0006

# V(.1,„

Justices
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# New command chaplain to focus on spiritual resiliency, religious-supply support to DoD

By Beth Reece

Defense Logistics Agency’s new command chaplainDLA’s religious-supply program

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

chaplainResiliencyreligious supplyreligious supportPeople and Culture
# C_2014253EN.01001201.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 May 2014 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-339/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 1999/74/EC - Articles 3 and 5(2) - Ban on rearing laying hens in unenriched cage systems - Rearing of laying hens in cages which do not conform to the requirements of that directive))

2014/C 253/15

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, agent, F Urbani Neri, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 3 and 5(2) of Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens (OJ 1999 L 203, p. 53)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | By having failed to ensure, from 1 January 2012, that laying hens are no longer reared in unenriched cage systems, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 and 5(2) of Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. |
| --- | --- |

1.

By having failed to ensure, from 1 January 2012, that laying hens are no longer reared in unenriched cage systems, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 and 5(2) of Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens.

| 2. | The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

1

---
```

[111th Congress Public Law 133]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3492]]

Public Law 111-133
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   16555 Springs Street in White Springs, Florida, as the ``Clyde L. 
    Hillhouse Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Jan. 29, 2010 -  [H.R. 
                                3667]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLYDE L. HILLHOUSE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 16555 Springs Street in White Springs, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Clyde L. Hillhouse Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clyde L. 
Hillhouse Post Office Building''.

    Approved January 29, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3667:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Dec. 1, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 96-1.

#### Thomasson *v.*Perry, Secretary of Defense, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1879 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1879

   To ensure that States have enacted criminal statutes that require 
  individuals to report child abuse cases to law enforcement or child 
                          protective agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2011

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To ensure that States have enacted criminal statutes that require 
  individuals to report child abuse cases to law enforcement or child 
                          protective agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Abuse Reporting Enforcement 
Act'' or the ``CARE Act''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO REPORT CHILD ABUSE.

    (a) In General.--Section 2002 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1397a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Reporting of Child Abuse.--
            ``(1) In general.--A State shall not be eligible for any 
        payment from its allotment under section 2003 if the Secretary 
        determines that the State has failed to satisfy the requirement 
        described in paragraph (2).
            ``(2) State child abuse reporting requirement.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The requirement described in 
                this paragraph is that the State has enacted a law that 
                creates a felony offense with a minimum penalty of 1-
                year imprisonment for any person who, having reasonable 
                cause to believe that a child has been subjected to 
                child abuse or acts of child abuse, fails to report 
                such information immediately to the relevant State law 
                enforcement agency and the child protection agency of 
                the State.
                    ``(B) Immunity.--The law of a State described in 
                subparagraph (A) may provide immunity from civil 
                liability and criminal liability to an individual who 
                reports child abuse or acts of child abuse.
                    ``(C) Child abuse.--For purposes of this paragraph, 
                the terms `child abuse' or `acts of child abuse' shall 
                have the meanings given such terms in the criminal code 
                of the State.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012355EN.01003804.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/38

---

Order of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ålands Industrihus v Commission

(Case T-212/12) (1)

1

2012/C 355/83

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.

1

---
EX-32.1




Section
      906 Certification





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutra Pharma Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rik J.
      Deitsch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
                  November 14, 2007/s/ Rik
                J. DeitschRik
                  J. DeitschChief
                  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-40308; AK-964-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving the surface and subsurface estates in 
certain lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims 
Settlement Act will be issued to Bering Straits Native Corporation. The 
lands are in the vicinity of Mary's Igloo, Alaska, and are located in:

    Kateel River Meridian, Alaska
T. 5 S., R. 30 W.,
    Sec. 13, lots 1 and 2;
    Tracts V thru Z, inclusive;
    Tracts AA, BB, and CC.

    Containing 453.52 acres.

    Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the 
Nome Nugget.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until June 21, to file an appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by 
phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#096862276b6564276a66677f6c7068676a6c496862276b6564276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcddd792ded0d192dfd3d2cad9c5ddd2dfd9fcddd792ded0d192dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

D. Kay Erben,
Land Law Examiner, Branch of Adjudication II.
[FR Doc. E7-9790 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### EHLER v. STŒVER.

March 24, 1836.

*Pule to show cause why the writ should not be set aside.*

Prior to the act of 13th June, 1836, four days service *exclusive*of the return day was required in *scire facias*against bail.

Of the issuing and service of writs since the act of 13th June, 1836.

THIS was a *scire facias*against the bail *to*the action, after a return of N. E. Í. issued on a *Friday,*returnable on the succeeding *Monday,*which was the return day of the term. The defendant obtained this rule.

*15Per Curiam.

The writ must be set aside. Four days service *exclusive*of the day of return is required in cases of *scire facias*against bail. 2 *Sdlon's Pr. 53,*54.

Rule absolute.a

a

 By the 3Oth-40th sections of the act of June 13, 1836, *(Stroud's*Furdon, *tit. Action)*the following- provisions are in substance made. 1. *Scire facias*is issued, served and returnable as a *summons in*a personal action. 2. The writ may issue, returnable to the *first day of the next term after issuing,*and may be served ten days *before*the return day* and in such case judgment may be taken for want of an appearance. 3. If there shall not be ten days *between*the issuing and the first day of the next term after issuing, the writ may be made returnable the next day preceding the last day of the term, or on the first day of the second term next after the issuing, except in the courts for the city and county of Philadelphia and Allegheny, in which the writ is made returnable on the first day of the next term, or on the first Monday of any intermediate month at the election of the plaintiff, 4, In. case the writ is not served ten days *before*the return day, the plaintiff may have judgment for want of an appearance at any day which shall be ten days *after*the service. The effect of these provisions is, that judgment for default of appearance in *scire facias*against bail, cannot be taken unless there is *ten days*service of the writ See Fisher *v.*Potter, Weaver *v.*Springer, and Thompson *v,*Patterson, in this volume.
#### Mamiye & Hidary *v.*United States

No. 5972.

Invoice dated Shanghai, China,- December 4, 1939.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 19, 1940,

Entry No. 773636/1.

(Decided January 11, 1944)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney),, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

In this appeal counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as the issue in *United States*v. *Kohlberg,*C. A. D. 88, and that the market value or price at or about the date of exportation, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of China, for exportation to the United States, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including all costs, charges, and expenses specified in section 402 (d) of the act of 1930, is the value found by the appraiser, less any amount added under dureés, and that there was no higher foreign value.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the-cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the-, merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the-appraiser, less any amount added under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HILL COUNTRY PRESERVATION, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

PHILIP G. KING and SYNCHROPILE, INC.,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00205

- CV

Appeal from

38th Judicial District Court

of Real County, Texas

(TC# 2023

- 3796

- DC)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the trial court’s judgment

should be affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part. T he trial court’s ruling granting

su mmary judgment and dismissing Appellant’s claims is affirmed except with regard to the

negligence claim arising from the specific professional engineering services King agreed to

perform

. The portion of the trial court’s judgment dismissing Appellant’s neg ligence claim only

to th at extent is reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with

the Court’s opinion.

We further order that each party shall pay one

- half of the costs of appeal , for which let

execution issue. See Tex. R . App. P. 43.5. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF APRIL 202 4

.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.

Alley, C.J., concurring without opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1907 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1907

  To promote transparency by permitting the Public Company Accounting 
Oversight Board to allow its disciplinary proceedings to be open to the 
                    public, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2011

Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To promote transparency by permitting the Public Company Accounting 
Oversight Board to allow its disciplinary proceedings to be open to the 
                    public, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PCAOB Enforcement Transparency Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. OPEN MEETINGS AUTHORIZED.

    Section 105(c)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 
7215(c)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Public hearings.--Hearings under this section shall 
        be open to the public, unless the Board, on its own motion or 
        after considering the motion of a party, orders otherwise.''.

SEC. 3. PUBLICATION OF DETERMINATIONS.

    Section 105(d)(1)(C) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 
7215(d)(1)(C)) is amended by striking ``(once any stay on the 
imposition of such sanction has been lifted)''.
                                 <all>
```