alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The SafeNursery 

s prevents 

etween the

sible

high. This

m catching

risk.

dboard or 

pment.

dware.

apart (so a

 slats). This

ping through

g her head.

This

g trapped

of the crib.

u use a

k it for

gs:

BRIGHT IDEAS FOR KEEPING YOUR BABY’S NURSERY SAFE

The SafeNursery

Brought to you by Babies“R”Us, Pampers Parenting 

Institute and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

Brought to you by Babies“R”Us, Pampers Parenting 

Institute and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

d.

e.

c.

When you buy a crib or other

new nursery products, check

for the safety certification

seal from the Juvenile

Products Manufacturers Association (JPMA). 

This ensures that the product meets national

safety standards. 

If you borrow or use older

nursery products or toys,

make sure they have not

been recalled for safety hazards. Call the

U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s

toll-free hotline at 1-800-638-2772 or 

visit their web site at www.cpsc.gov

for this information.

Find this

brochure 

and other important safety information 

online at www.babiesrus.com

For expert

information 

on baby care, 

parenting and 

much more, visit the Pampers

Parenting Institute at 

Pampers.com
r pillow-like soft

s a year old. If

nd the crib

r as the baby’s

ains uncovered

falls and other serious injuries to your baby. All neededitems should be within reach.Cord Care and Clothing Cautions Position cribs away from window blind cords, removedrawstrings from children’s clothing,and don’t put strings on pacifiers.These can be strangulation hazards for your baby. Look forclothing with other types offasteners likebuttons, snaps,zippers or Velcro. Cut the loops of blind and draperycords and use safety tassels.Toy TipsRemove crib gymsand mobiles fromthe crib when yourbaby begins to pushup on hands and knees.No strings or cords should dangle into the crib.Keep balloons and toys with small parts awayfrom your baby to help prevent chokingand suffocation. Any item smaller than the head of thisrattle (1.68" diameter) is a choking hazard.

More Smart MovesInstall smoke alarms andcarbon monoxide (CO)alarms in your home.This will help keep your baby and family safe from fire and CO poisoning.Remember to change the batteries regularly. Consider using anglebraces or anchors to secure furniture to the wall.Use safety latches on lower drawers and cabinet doors toensure they are not opened by children. You may want touse a baby monitor to keep your baby within earshot.Safety-proof your home with baby gates, safety 

latches, and outlet covers.

You’ll be safeguarding your 

baby from falls, poisonings, 

and electrocution.

n are what

t. That’s why

and the

your baby

p you create

our baby.

Jumbo
exv4w9



 





Exhibit 4.9



FIFTH
AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT DATED AS OF APRIL 23, 2002 AS AMENDED
JUNE 18, 2004 (THE “FIRST
AMENDMENT”), SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 (THE “SECOND
AMENDMENT”), MARCH 21, 2006 (THE “THIRD AMENDMENT”)
AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
(THE “FOURTH AMENDMENT”) (AS AMENDED, THE “LOAN AGREEMENT”) BY AND
AMONG
PHI, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS PETROLEUM HELICOPTERS, INC. (“PHI”), AIR
EVAC SERVICES, INC., PHI TECH
SERVICES, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS EVANGELINE
AIRMOTIVE, INC., INTERNATIONAL HELICOPTER TRANSPORT,
INC. (“SUBSIDIARY
GUARANTORS”), AND WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK (“WHITNEY”)




     WHEREAS, use of the credit facility provided for in the Loan Agreement has been made and
therefore PHI desires to extend the credit facility.



     WHEREAS, the current agreement is not effective after September 1, 2008.



     NOW THEREFORE, for good and adequate consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, PHI, the Subsidiary Guarantors and Whitney do hereby amend the Loan Agreement to
extend the maturity as follows:


I. Effective as of the date hereof, the Fourth Amendment, and in turn, the Loan Agreement, are
hereby modified as follows:





A. In Paragraph II of the Fourth Amendment, the date of September 1, 2008 is changed to
September 1, 2009.


II. In connection with the foregoing and only in connection with the foregoing, the Loan
Agreement is hereby amended, but in all other respects all of the terms and conditions of the Loan
Agreement remain unaffected and in full force and effect as originally written.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Fifth Amendment to Loan Agreement is dated as of August 1, 2007.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	PHI, INC., formerly known as	 	 	 	WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK
	Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/ Michael J. McCann	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Harry C. Stahel
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Michael J. McCann
	 	 	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Harry C. Stahel
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Senior Vice President
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	AIR EVAC SERVICES, INC.	 	 	 	PHI TECH SERVICES,
INC., formerly known
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 as Evangeline Airmotive, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/ Michael J. McCann	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name:	 	Michael J. McCann	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Michael J. McCann
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Michael J. McCann
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	INTERNATIONAL HELICOPTER	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TRANSPORT, INC.	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/ Michael J. McCann	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Michael J. McCann	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Larry HOPKINS, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 73286.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Sept. 15, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Nov. 6,1998.

Gwenda R. Robinson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Catherine Chatman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., and CRAHAN and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Larry Hopkins appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of first degree murder, in violation of section 565.020 RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo 1994.

On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a mistrial based, on the prosecutor’s alleged failure to timely disclose evidence. In addition, defendant requests plain error review of the trial court’s allowing the deputy chief medical examiner of the City of St. Louis to testify as to the findings contained in the autopsy report written by the chief medical examiner of the City of St. Louis without proper foundation that the chief medical examiner was qualified as an expert in his field.

*779We have examined the briefs and the record on appeal. We find no manifest injustice. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no precedential or jurisprudential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
No. 39218.

#### Protest 886351-G of Louis Wolf & Co., Inc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 37636 the wooden cabinets in question were held dutiable at *33Yz*percent under paragraph 412 as claimed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2042 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2042

  To reinstate the reporting provision relating to fees and expenses 
  awarded to prevailing parties in civil actions involving the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2012

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reinstate the reporting provision relating to fees and expenses 
  awarded to prevailing parties in civil actions involving the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORTING OF FEES AND EXPENSES AWARDED.

    Section 2412(d) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(5) The Attorney General shall submit to Congress and make 
publically available online an annual report regarding the amount of 
fees and other expenses awarded during the preceding fiscal year under 
this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
Before the First Division,

January 25, 1939

No. 40521.

#### Protest 965039-G of Ozalid Corporation (New York).

*559Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same as the sensitizing preparations and developer for photoprint paper passed upon in *Ozalid Corp.*v. *United States*(T. D. 48969). The claim at 40 percent ad valorem and 7 cents per pound under paragraph 27 was therefore sustained.
No. 55580.

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 168016-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Order entered August 23, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00053
- CR No. 05
- 19
- 0005 4
- CR JIMMY EARL SHELLY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appe al from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F18
- 75945
- S & F18
- 75947
- S



### O RDER Before the Court is pro se appellant’s August 19, 2019 motion for a copy of the record. In the motion, appellant alleges he has not rec eived “trial transcripts.”
We ORDER appellant’s counsel, Sharita Blacknall, to send appellant copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s records and to provide this Court, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, with written verification that the record h as been sent to appellant.
We DIRECT the Clerk to transmit a copy of this order by electronic transmission to counsel for the parties. We further DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first class mail, to JimmyEarl Shelly; TDCJ No. 02242800; Polunsky Unit; 3872 FM 350 South ; Livingston , Texas 7 7351

.

On the Court’s own motion, we extend the time for filing appellant’s pro se response to October 4, 2019.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
(Reap. Dec. 9147)

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 3625; 3814.

(Decided May 14, 1958)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement relate to various classes of merchandise exported from France and entered at the port of Seattle.

The cases have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation wherein the parties agree that the issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those which were the subject of the decision in *Bert Friedberg & Company*v. *United States,*36 Cust. Ct. 696, Reap. Dec. 8590, the record in which case was incorporated herein by consent. In that case, the court held foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise there under consideration, and that such statutory value did not include the so-called “French sole or unique tax.”

An agreed set of facts, included in the stipulation of submission, establishes that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise involved herein is statutory foreign value, and that such value for each of the items in question is the unit value in French francs in column 11 of the invoices, reduced by 16.85 per centum, plus packing, as invoiced, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology
      Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sanding Tao, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May
      20, 2008




/S/
                Sanding TaoSanding
                Tao
              Chief
                Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 4.11

PROMISSORY NOTE

|         |  |                                     
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------
|$690,000 |  | October 8, 1998
Alexandria, Virginia

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, a Virginia corporation (the
Borrower) hereby promises to pay to the order of RESEARCH INDUSTRIES
INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation (the Lender), at 123 North Pitt Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314, or such other location as the holder hereof may in
writing designate, the principal sum of SIX HUNDRED AND NINETY THOUSAND AND
NO/00 DOLLARS ($690,000), in lawful money of the United States of America in
immediately available funds, on January 6, 1999, without defense, offset or
counterclaim, together with interest on the unpaid principal amount hereof, at
such office, in like money and funds, from the date hereof at the rate of eight
(8) per cent per annum.

This Note is subject to the terms and conditions of the Subordination
Agreement dated January 27, 1998 entered into by and among Research Industries
Incorporated, Crestar Bank and Halifax Corporation.

This Note is one of two Notes referred to in the Loan Agreement between
the Borrower and the Lender dated October 8, 1998.

The Borrower hereby waives presentment, demand, notice of dishonor,
protest and all other demands and notices in connection with the delivery,
acceptance, performance and enforcement of this Note. Lender shall be entitled
to recover any costs and reasonable attorneys fees incurred in the collection
of this Note.

This Note may be prepaid at anytime without penalty.

This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws
of the Commonwealth of Virginia, without reference to conflict of laws
principles.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has caused this note to be executed by
its duly authorized President as of the day and year first above written.

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | BORROWER                                  
|
| | HALIFAX CORPORATION
a Virginia Corporation
|
| | By:  /s/  HOWARD C. MILLS                 
| |                                           
| | Name:  Howard C. Mills
Title: President
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friendly Energy Exploration (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas Tallant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/Douglas Tallant By: Douglas Tallant Chief Executive Officer  Dated: August 16, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed February 5, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01346-CR 

No. 05-19-01347-CR 

WILLIAM JEREMY NUTT, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 401-80013-2014 & 401-80012-2014 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Reichek 

Opinion by Justice Osborne 

Before the Court is appellant’s January 21, 2020 motion to dismiss these appeals. The 

motion is signed by appellant and counsel. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeals. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 

191346F.U05 

 

/Leslie Osborne/ 

LESLIE OSBORNE 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

WILLIAM JEREMY NUTT, Appellant 

No. 05-19-01346-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 401-80013-2014. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne, 

Justices Schenck and Reichek participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered February 5, 2020 

 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

WILLIAM JEREMY NUTT, Appellant 

No. 05-19-01347-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 401-80012-2014. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne, 

Justices Schenck and Reichek participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered February 5, 2020
1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of the registrant;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the
Report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the Report, based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in the Report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and,
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Kevin T. ConroyKevin T. Conroy,Chief Executive Officer
April 1, 1942

No. 47045.

Suit 4353.

#### *Green Kay Corp. et al.*v. *United States.*

C. A. D. 193.
No. 96-957.

#### Jefferson, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jefferson, Deceased, et al. *v.*City of Tarrant, Alabama.

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether, when a decedent’s death is alleged to have resulted from a deprivation of federal rights occurring in Alabama, the Alabama Wrongful Death Act, Ala. Code §6-5-410 (1993), governs the recovery by the representative of the decedent’s estate under 42 U. S. C. § 1983?”
----

----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|           | Rubicon Minerals Corporation |                                 |
|----------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|           |                         |                                 |   |
| March 31, 2011 | By:                          | /s/ Robert G. Lewis             |   |
|           |                         | Name:  Robert G. Lewis          |   |
|           |                         | Title:  Chief Financial Officer |   |
|           |                         |                                 |   |

----

----
Sanitized Version

of ZT NIOSH