[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41102-41103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414]


Duke Power Company, et al.; Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 
2, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
considering issuance of amendments to Facility Operating License Nos. 
NPF-35 and NPF-52, issued to Duke Power Company, et al. (the licensee), 
for operation of the Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, located in 
York County, South Carolina.

Environmental Assessment

Identification of Proposed Action

    The proposed action would amend the licenses to reflect the 
licensee's name change from ``Duke Power Company'' to ``Duke Energy 
Corporation.''

[[Page 41103]]

    The proposed action is in response to the licensee's application 
dated June 12, 1997.

The Need for the Proposed Action

    Duke Power Company changed its name to ``Duke Energy Corporation.'' 
The facility operating licenses for Catawba were issued to indicate the 
name of the licensee as ``Duke Power Company,'' and therefore need to 
be amended to substitute the new name of the licensee. The proposed 
action is purely administrative.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
and concludes that there is no significant environmental impact if the 
amendments are granted. No changes will be made to the design and 
licensing bases, and procedures of the two units at Catawba Nuclear 
Station. Other than the name change, no other changes will be made to 
the facility operating licenses, including the Technical 
Specifications.
    The change will not increase the probability or consequences of 
accidents, no changes are being made in the types of any effluents that 
may be released offsite, and there is no significant increase in the 
allowable individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. 
Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
action does not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no other 
environmental impact. Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there 
are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts associated 
with the proposed action.

Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    Since the Commission has concluded there is no measurable 
environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any 
alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be 
evaluated. As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff 
considered denial of the proposed action. Denial of the application 
would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The 
environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action 
are similar.

Alternative Use of Resources

    This action does did not involve the use of any resources not 
previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement related to 
the Catawba Nuclear Station.

Agencies and Persons Contacted

    In accordance with its stated policy, on July 11, 1997, the staff 
consulted with the South Carolina State official, Virgil Autrey of the 
Bureau of Radiological Health, South Carolina Department of Health and 
Environmental Control, regarding the environmental impact of the 
proposed amendments. The State official had no comments.

Finding of No Significant Impact

    Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, the Commission 
concludes that the proposed amendments will not have a significant 
effect on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the 
Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental impact 
statement for the proposed amendments.
    For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
licensee's request for the amendments dated June 12, 1997, which is 
available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document 
Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington DC, and at 
the local public document room located at the York County Library, 138 
East Black Street, Rock Hill, South Carolina.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of July 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Peter S. Tam,
Acting Director, Project Directorate II-2, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-20188 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P