alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AS
                              OF SEPTEMBER  30, 1995 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1994, AND
                              THE  STATEMENTS OF OPERATION AND THE STATEMENTS OF
                              CASH FLOW FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
                              1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                              TO SUCH ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL
                              YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                   U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                OCT-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                            833,820
<SECURITIES>                                    3,671,569
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,366,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                       80,000
<INVENTORY>                                       524,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,526,595
<PP&E>                                          1,148,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                    499,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  8,365,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,363,291
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           21,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      6,980,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    8,365,519
<SALES>                                         6,864,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,085,539
<CGS>                                           4,558,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,558,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,230,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   35,704
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   261,053
<INCOME-TAX>                                       90,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               171,053
<DISCONTINUED>                                     55,515
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      226,568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .12
        


</TABLE>
# C_2015138EN.01001601.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/16

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances v Gérard de Ruyter

(Case C-623/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 4 - Substantive scope - Levies on income from assets - General social contribution - Social debt repayment contribution - Social levy - Additional contribution to the social levy - Participation in the financing of compulsory social security schemes - Direct and sufficiently relevant link with some branches of social security))

(2015/C 138/20)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

Applicant:

Defendant: Gérard de Ruyter

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996 and as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1606/98 of 29 June 1998, must be interpreted as meaning that levies on income from assets, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, have, when they contribute to the financing of compulsory social security schemes, a direct and relevant link with some of the branches of social security listed in Article 4 of that regulation and thus fall within the scope of the regulation, even though those levies are imposed on the income from assets of taxable persons, irrespective of the pursuit by them of any professional activity.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.

1

---
No. 47752.

#### Protests 34833-K, etc., of Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keeee, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plain white china articles embossed in the mold with decorative handles, and that they -are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47194, the claim at only 60 percent under paragraph 212 was sustained.
No. 5659.

#### IN RE QUAKER REALTY COMPANY,

Praying for confirmation. Reported, through error, in book X, p. 92.
No. 74-979.

#### Twomey, Warden, et al. *v.*Wright.

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May      14, 2009 |   | /s/      Jeffrey S. Keuntjes       |
|-------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Jeffrey      S. Keuntjes           |
|                                |   | Vice      President - Finance      |
|                                |   | (principal      financial officer) |

----

----
##### 



Exhibit No. 10.5




---



##### 



NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED (THE CORPORATION)
 DIRECTORS REMUNERATION, RETIREMENT COMPENSATION AND GROUP LIFE INSURANCE
  US DollarsBOARD RETAINER:
    
    $50,000 per annumLONG TERM INCENTIVE:
    
    $75,000(1)*COMMITTEE MEMBER RETAINERS:
    
    $12,500 per annum(2)Audit Committee(2)Pension Fund Policy CommitteeJoint Leadership Resources Committee(3)COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN RETAINER(4)
    
    $15,000 per annum(5)**AUDIT COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN RETAINER
    
    $35,000 per annum(6)**
 Note
 1.
    
    Payable over four fiscal quarters commencing the third quarter of 20052.
    
    If on same Nortel Networks Corporation Committee, Committee member retainer is $6,250 per
annum3.
    
    Joint Committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and Nortel Networks Corporation4.
    
    Except Audit Committee5.
    
    If Chairman of same Nortel Networks Corporation Committee, Chairman retainer is $7,500 per
annum6.
    
    If Chairman of same Nortel Networks Corporation Committee, Chairman retainer is $17,500 per
annum
 DIRECTORS DEFERRED SHARE COMPENSATION PLAN (THE PLAN)




---



##### 



Note
 1.
    
    Directors fees are paid in quarterly installments at the end of each calendar quarter.2.
    
    Directors fees generally are not payable to Directors who are salaried employees of Nortel
Networks Corporation, Nortel Networks Limited or of any of its or their subsidiaries.
 RETIREMENT COMPENSATION
 DOES NOT APPLY TO DIRECTORS ELECTED AFTER JANUARY 1, 1996
  Base
    
    IndexedRetirement
    
    RetirementCompensation*
    
    Compensation**For directors who retired on
or after April 1, 1984
    
    
    75%
    
    
    
    56.25%For directors who retired
prior to April 1, 1984
    
    
    50%
    
    
    
    37.5%
 
 *
    
    75% of US$27,500 or 75% of the Board retainer fee payable when
Director so ceased to hold office as such, whichever is greater;**
    
    Percentage of excess of prevailing Board retainer over Board
retainer at date of retirement.
  GROUP LIFE INSURANCE
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ixia Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 8, 2007
    
    /s/ Errol Ginsberg

Errol GinsbergPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 8, 2007
    
    /s/ Thomas B. Miller

Thomas B. MillerChief Financial Officer
 28
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **FirstBingo.com** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended **September 30, 2004** as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Thomas M. Sheppard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 15th day of November, 2004.

 
/s/ Thomas M. Sheppard 
Thomas M. Sheppard  
Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 146 (Wednesday, July 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 072397D]


Marine Mammals; Permit No. 789 (P135C)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that permit no. 789 submitted by Dr. 
James H.W. Hain, NMFS, NOAA, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 
Water Street, Woods Hole, MA, 02543-1026, has been amended to extend 
the expiration date through December 31, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The amended permit is available for review by written 
request or by appointment in the following offices:
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
    1315 East-West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/
713-2289);
    Northeast Region, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-
2298, (508/281-9150); and
    Southeast Region, NMFS, 9721 Executive Center Drive, N., St. 
Petersburg, FL 33702-2432 (813/893-3141).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject amendment has been issued under 
the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended 
(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the provisions of Sec. 216.39 of the 
regulations of the governing the taking and importing (50 CFR part 
216), the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 
1531 et seq.), and the provisions of Sec. 222.25 of the regulations 
governing the taking, importing, and exporting of endangered fish and 
wildlife (50 CFR part 222).
    Issuance of this amended permit as required by the ESA was based on 
a finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the 
subject of this permit; and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: July 23, 1997.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits & Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-20009 Filed 7-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                                 AS ENACTED BY
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-Q, Third Wave Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Puisis, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                  /s/ John Puisis
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  John Puisis
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  May 15, 2003
# C_2013063EN.01002301.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/23

---

Action brought on 21 December 2012 — Kaatsu International/OHIM (KAATSU)

(Case T-567/12)

2013/C 63/46

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kaatsu International Co. Ltd (Morningside Drive, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision of the Board; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of the Board;

| — | Order the defendant to pay to the Applicant the Applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay to the Applicant the Applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘KAATSU’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10, 16, 28, 41 and 44 — Community trade mark application No 10 179 547

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 96-1208.

#### Meehan *v.*Town of East Lyme et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-10.47



 





EXHIBIT 10.47




Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation




     For fiscal 2007, the compensation for the non-employee directors of The Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc. (Group Inc.) consisted of:




	 	•	 	a $75,000 annual retainer awarded on December 19, 2007 as 343 fully vested
restricted stock units (RSUs) to all non-employee directors of Group Inc. other than
Ruth J. Simmons, who elected to receive cash, and Lord Browne of Madingley, who
resigned as a director of the Group Inc. Board of Directors in May 2007 and received a
prorated retainer of $37,500;
	 
	 	•	 	a $25,000 committee chair fee awarded on December 19, 2007 as 115 fully vested RSUs
to each committee chair other than Edward M. Liddy, who became Chair of the Audit
Committee in May 2007 and received a prorated fee of 67 fully vested RSUs, and Lord
Browne, who resigned as Chair of the Audit Committee of the Group Inc. Board of
Directors in May 2007 and received a prorated fee of $12,500; and
	 
	 	•	 	an annual equity grant awarded on December 19, 2007 of 2,900 fully vested RSUs for
each director other than John H. Bryan and Claes Dahlbäck, who each elected to receive
a grant of 1,450 fully vested RSUs and 5,800 fully vested stock options (Options),
James A. Johnson, who elected to receive a grant of 11,600 fully vested Options, and
Lord Browne of Madingley, who received $296,032 in lieu of a prorated equity grant.





     RSUs awarded in connection with non-employee director compensation provide for delivery of the
underlying shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (Common Stock), of Group Inc. on the
last business day in May in the year following the year of the non-employee director’s retirement
from the Group Inc. Board of Directors. Options awarded with respect to the fiscal 2007 annual
equity grant have an exercise price of $204.16 (the closing price per share of Common Stock on the
NYSE on the date of grant), and generally become exercisable on the earlier of (i) the date the
non-employee director ceases to be a director of Group Inc. and (ii) January 2011, although if the
non-employee director remains a director of Group Inc., the underlying shares are subject to
transfer restrictions until January 2013.



     The Group Inc. Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee, has a policy on stock ownership that requires each non-employee director to
beneficially own at least 5,000 shares of Common Stock or fully vested RSUs within two years of
becoming a director. All non-employee directors of Group Inc. are in compliance with this policy.



     Non-employee directors of Group Inc. are permitted to participate in Group Inc.’s employee
matching gift program on the same terms as employees. Under the program for 2007, Group Inc.
matched gifts of up to $10,000 in the aggregate per participating individual.



     Non-employee directors receive no compensation other than directors’ fees.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Qinan Ji, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
7, 2010





/s/
      Qinan JiQinan
      Ji, Principal Executive
Officer
#### John Mercer, Appellant, vs. Herbert H. Booby, Appellee.

The appearance by attorney of a party summon ed as a garnishee, cures aDy dedefect in the service of the writ of garnishment.

Appeal from Hillsborough Circuit Court. Bor the facts of the case, reference is made to the opinion of the Court.

*Jos. B. Lancaster,*for Appellant.

*J. T. Magbee,*for Appellee.

DU TONT, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant John Mercer was summoned by a writ of garnishment, to answer and set forth what goods and chat-ties, rights and credits, money or effects were in his possession or control, belonging to Philip S. Lever, the plaintiff in execution. The indorsement on the writ is as follows : “ Served—-July 25th, 1854—E. T. Kendrick, Sheriff.” The record shows that at the fall term, 1854, the parties *appeared*by their attorneys and that a judgment was entered against the garnishee for the want oí a plea or answer.

The error assigned is that the endorsement on the writ *724does not show *how*the service was perfected, whether by delivery of a copy or otherwise.

The statute (vide Thompson’s Digest, 372,) provides that the service of the writ of garnishment shall he the same as is provided in the case of a *summons ad respondendum,*and it has been heretofore decided by this court that the *appearamce*of a defendant in a suit cures any defect in the service of the writ. (D. B. Wood *&*Co. vs. Bk. of the State of Geo., 1 Fla. Rep., 378.) We can perceive no good reason why the same rule should not he applicable to the service of writs of garnishment.

Therefore let the judgment of the Circuit Court he affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Bioanalytical Systems, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-56123 and 333-56127) on Form S-8 of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. of our
report dated January 7, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of
Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of September 30, 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for
the year then ended which report appears in the September 30, 2004, annual
report on Form 10-K of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc.

/s/  KPMG LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
January 12, 2005
#### Stern & Stern Textile Importers, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6576.

Entry No. 755291, etc.

Invoices dated Nottingham, England, May 20, 1942, etc.

Certified May 21, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 18, 1942, etc.

(Decided December 5, 1946)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 96-7992.

#### Rodriguez Salinas *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.