Enclosure 1
ENCLOSURE 1

INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST FOR

Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

This information collection request is being conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 

Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) to assist the EPA Administrator in developing emission standards for 

Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 112. The survey is being sent 

under the authority of Section 114 of the CAA. 

BACKGROUND:

Section 112 (d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) calls for EPA to promulgate national technology-based emission 

standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for sources emitting one or more of the HAP listed in CAA 

section 112(b). For major sources, these technology-based standards must reflect the maximum degree of 

emissions reductions of HAP achievable (after considering cost, energy requirements, and nonair quality 

health and environmental impacts). In addition, under CAA section 112(d)(6), EPA is required to review 

the technology-based standards and revise them “as necessary (taking into account developments in 

practices, processes, and control technologies)” no less frequently than every 8 years. Furthermore, we are 

required by section 112(f) (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to assess the risk remaining (residual risk) eight 

years after the promulgation of maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards under section 

112(d). If we find the residual risk fails to protect public health with an ample margin of safety or to prevent 

(taking into consideration various factors) adverse environmental effects, we are required to promulgate 

more stringent standards. 

The Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards 

were promulgated on July 1, 1996 (see 61 FR 34140). We are collecting specific detailed information to 

support development of standards as part of our review as described above. Please note this survey is for offsite waste and recovery operations only. 

CAA section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any person who owns or operates any emission 

source, who manufactures emission control equipment or process equipment, who the Administrator believes 

may have information necessary for the purposes set forth in section 114(a), or who is subject to any 

requirement of the CAA (other than certain provisions under Title II), to provide EPA with information for 

the following purposes:

1. Developing or assisting in the development of the following:

a. State implementation plans (§§ 110 and 111(d));

b. New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) (§ 111);

c. National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) (§ 112);

d. Solid waste combustion or other related solid waste regulations (§ 129);

2. Determining whether any person is in violation of any standards or requirements developed under 

the authorities cited above; or

3. Carrying out any provision under the CAA (except certain provisions under Title II).

The Administrator may require that those persons identified above do the following so the Administrator 

may have the information necessary for the items listed in #1-3:

 establish and maintain records; 

 make reports; 
 install, use, and maintain monitoring equipment, and use audit procedures, or methods; 

 sample emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such 

intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); 

 keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when 

direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; 

 submit compliance certifications in accordance with section 114(a)(3); and 

 provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require.

DIRECTIONS: 

 All recipients must complete and return this survey by April 10, 2013.

 Please identify clearly any response(s) that you consider to be confidential business 

information (CBI). Any responses not so identified will be included in a publicly available 

database. Refer to Enclosures 3, 4, 5, and 6 for more information on the treatment of CBI and a list 

of information you may be asked to submit later to substantiate a claim of confidentiality.

DEFINITIONS: For the purposes of this ICR only, terms used have the meanings attributed to them in 40 

CFR 63.681. 

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI): 

Please indicate if any CBI is included in this survey response: Y ■N 

OFF-SITE WASTE AND RECOVERY OPERATIONS

We believe that you own a facility that has Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations. If you believe that 

this survey does not pertain to you, please indicate your reason below: 

 The Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations are permanently shut down. Please also identify the 

date the Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations were shut down, what steps were taken to close the 

equipment or stop operations, and if you still have a permit.

_________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________

■ No Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations at this facility. Please identify the operations at the 

facility. 

The Ponca City Refinery does receive off-site material that contains HAPs listed in 40 CFR 63 

Subpart DD. However, the amount of total HAP in the off-site waste received is less than 1 Mg/yr. 

As such, per 40 CFR 63.680(d), the refinery meets the criteria for the facility-wide exemption from 

the rule and so is not required to comply with the requirements of §§63.682 through 63.699.

The Phillips 66 Company Ponca City Refinery (Refinery) refines crude oil to produce propane, 

gasoline, heating oil, residual fuels, petroleum coke and other miscellaneous petroleum products. 

Major units at the Refinery include three crude units, two fluidized catalytic cracking units (FCCUs), a 

coker and other major upgrading units. Major process units include:

• Fluidized catalytic cracking units to upgrade gas oil to gasoline and diesel fuel

• Alkylation, polymerization and catalytic reforming units to produce high octane gasoline 

blending components
• A coker to crack/convert residuals into lighter hydrocarbon compounds and produce anode 

grade coke for aluminum manufacturing

• Multiple desulfurization units to remove sulfur from products and intermediates, allowing 

production of low sulfur products from high sulfur feedstocks.

• Amine contactors and regenerators to recover hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from various Refinery 

process streams such as fuel gas, hydrotreater recycle hydrogen, and propane product 

streams. 

If your facility does not have Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations, please respond as soon as 

possible. We will review that information and respond as to whether you need to complete any other part 

of the survey.
Enclosure 2
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 1 of 12

General Information

Name of Legal Owner: Phillips 66

Legal Owner Address: 3010 Briarpark Drive

Houston, Texas 77042

Number of Legal Owner Employees: IRS Employer Identification No. 45-3779385

Facility Name: Ponca City Refinery

Facility Address: 1000 South Pine Street

Ponca City, Oklahoma 74601

Mailing Address (if different from 

facility address):

Facility Contact Name: Neta Hercyk

Facility Contact Title: Environmental Scientist

Facility Contact Phone Number: (580) 767-4182

Facility Contact Email Address: neta.l.hercyk@p66.com

Number of Company Employees at 

the Entire Facility: Ponca City Refinery Employees = 661

Please enter any other comments 

regarding general ownership 

information here:
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 2 of 12

Facility Information

Is the facility a major source for HAP? (see definition below)

Major sources are any stationary source or group of stationary 

sources located within a contiguous area and under common 

control that emits or has the potential to emit considering 

controls, in the aggregate, 10 tons per year (TPY) or more of any 

hazardous air pollutant or 25 TPY or more of any combination of 

HAP. 

Are there one or more off-site waste management or recovery 

operations at the facility subject to the Off-Site Waste and 

Recovery Operations (OSWRO) MACT (40 CFR 63, subpart DD)?

Is the facility exempt from complying with the OSWRO MACT?

What type(s) of off-site waste does the facility accept? (please 

include shipment method, physical form (i.e., solid, liquid, 

sludge), and a general description)

Approximately how many sources (facilities) does that waste 

come from?

What is the base year for which information is being provided? 

(please limit reporting years between 2006 and 2012, and 

provide the most current year)

For this base year, what was the amount of off-site waste 

received? (please specify units; e.g., gal/yr)

For this base year, what was the HAP content of the off-site 

waste received? (please specify units; e.g., tons)

How many hours per year are control devices bypassed to the 

atmosphere to perform routine maintenance?

Are any OSWRO operations scheduled to be discontinued? 

Are any OSWRO operations scheduled to be added or expanded?

What is the permitting classification of your facility?

What are the operating permit IDs for the OSWRO operations at 

your facility?

Is your operating permit available online?

Please provide the coordinates (in decimal degrees) of your 

facility property boundary at each corner (node). Alternatively, 

please provide the minimum distance from any OSWRO emission 

point to the facility property boundary.

Please enter any other comments regarding the facility here:

If yes, please explain:

NA

Jupiter Facility - water - water sewer line

R&D West Facility - water - water sewer line

Product terminal - water - tank truck (2,100 

gallons/load)

3

NA

NA

If yes, please provide a link to or a copy of your 

most recent operating permit. If no, please 

provide a copy of your most recent operating 

permit.

0.27 megagrams

If yes, please provide date(s) that addition(s) 

and/or expansion(s) will begin production and 

explain changes:

If yes, please provide dates of closure and explain 

changes:

NA

NA

The Ponca City Refinery does receive off-site 

material that contains HAPs listed in 40 CFR 63 

Subpart DD. However, the amount of total HAP in 

the off-site waste received is less than 1 Mg/yr. As 

such, per 40 CFR 63.680(d), the refinery meets the 

criteria for the facility-wide exemption from the 

rule and so is not required to comply with the 

requirements of §§63.682 through 63.699. 

2012

4,417,584 gallons of water
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 3 of 12

If no, please explain.

NA

If no, please explain.

NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If neither apply, please explain:

The Ponca City Refinery is subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CC 

(Refinery MACT) and NSPS GGGa

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):

NA

Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of 

this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

NA

Pumps NA

Compressors NA

Agitators NA

Pressure relief devices NA

Sampling connection systems NA

Open-ended valves or lines NA

Connectors NA

Instrumentation systems NA

Equipment Leaks

Have you verified and/or corrected the equipment leak emissions 

for your OSWRO processes in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your OSWRO 

equipment leaks in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate the 

equipment leak emissions?

Please enter any other comments regarding equipment leaks here:

What is the number of each type of component for the equipment 

in OSWRO HAP service (equipment that contacts off-site material 

having a total HAP concentration ≥ 10% by weight for 300 

hours/year or more)?

With which subpart do you comply for equipment leaks?

Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for the 

equipment leak emissions estimates. What type of 

documentation are you providing?

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control 

techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard?
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

If no, please explain.

NA

If no, please explain.

NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):

NA

Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of 

this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

NA

Please enter any other comments regarding transfer 

systems here:

Transfer Systems

Have you entered the OSWRO transfer system emissions in 

Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your 

OSWRO transfer systems in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate 

the transfer system emissions?

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control 

techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard?

Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for 

the transfer system emissions estimates. Are you providing 

emissions factors or source test data?
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

If no, please explain.

NA

If no, please explain.

NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):

NA

Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of 

this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

NA

Please enter any other comments regarding organic or oilwater separators here:

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control 

techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard?

Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for 

the oil-water and organic-water separators emissions 

estimates. Are you providing emissions factors or source 

test data?

Oil-water and organic-water separators

Have you entered the OSWRO oil-water and organic-water 

separators emissions in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your 

OSWRO oil-water and organic-water separators in Enclosure 

2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate 

the oil-water and organic-water separators emissions?
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

If no, please explain.

If no, please explain.

If "Other", please explain:

Please list each OSWRO container requiring Level 1 or Level 2 control: 

Container ID Container capacity

Container emissions control level 

implemented

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA

If "Other", please explain:

Please enter any other comments regarding containers here:

(add information for more containers as necessary)

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control 

techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard?

NA

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):

Please provide the additional capital and annual 

costs of this practice above that required by the 

OSWRO NESHAP:

NA

NA

NA

NA

Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for 

the containers emissions estimates. Are you providing 

emissions factors or source test data?

Containers

Have you entered the OSWRO containers emissions in 

Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your 

OSWRO containers in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate 

the containers emissions?
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

If no, please explain.

NA

If no, please explain.

NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

NA

NA

Please enter any other comments regarding surface 

impoundments here:

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):

Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of this 

practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

Surface Impoundments

Have you entered the OSWRO surface impoundments 

emissions in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your 

OSWRO surface impoundments in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate 

the surface impoundments emissions?

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control 

techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard?

Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for 

the surface impoundments emissions estimates. Are you 

providing emissions factors or source test data?
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 8 of 12

If no, please explain.

If no, please explain.

Process Vent Emissions Information

Have you verified and/or corrected the process vent 

emissions for your OSWRO processes in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for your 

OSWRO process vent streams in Enclosure 2A?

NA

What emissions calculation approach was used to estimate 

the process vent emissions?

Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis for 

the process vent emissions estimates. Are you providing 

emissions factors or source test data?

NA

NA

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP control 

techniques beyond those required by the MACT standard?

Please enter any other comments regarding process vents 

here:

If "Other", please explain:

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):

Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of 

this practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

NA

NA

NA

If "Other", please explain:
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 9 of 12

Tanks Emissions Information

NA NA NA

Please list each OSWRO tank requiring Level 1 or Level 2 control: 

Tank ID Tank capacity Tank content MTVP1 Tank content AVP2 Tank height Tank diameter

Tank average 

annual throughput

Tank emissions 

control equipment

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

1

 Maximum True HAP Vapor Pressure 

2

 Average HAP Vapor Pressure 

For each tank with an internal floating roof, please list the slotted ladder information: 

Tank ID

Number of ladders 

with slotted legs

Gasketed deck cover 

over slotted ladder(s)?

Ladder sleeve over 

slotted ladder(s)?

Pole wipers in place for 

slotted ladder legs?

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA

For each tank with a fixed roof, please list the tank fitting information: 

Tank ID

Number of access 

hatches

Number of gauge 

hatches

Number of 

conservation vents

Number of 

valves/instruments

Number of 

emergency 

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1

 Maximum True HAP Vapor Pressure

For each tank with a floating roof (internal or external), please list the tank information: 

Tank ID

Annual number of 

days roof rests on 

landing legs Length of landing legs

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

If "Other", please explain:

NA

If "Other", please explain:

Please enter any other comments regarding tanks here:

NA

If yes, please describe the control technique(s):

(add information for more tanks as necessary)

(add information for more tanks as necessary)

(add information for more tanks as necessary)

(add information for more tanks as necessary)

Please provide the additional capital and annual costs of this 

practice above that required by the OSWRO NESHAP:

Please provide documentation demonstrating the basis 

for the tanks emissions estimates. Are you providing 

emissions factors, source test data or other data?

NA

Are you implementing work practices or other HAP 

control techniques beyond those required by the MACT 

standard?

Have you entered the tanks emissions for your OSWRO 

processes in Enclosure 2A?

Have you completed all control information fields for 

your OSWRO storage vessels in Enclosure 2A?

What emissions calculation approach was used to 

estimate the tank emissions?

If no, please explain.

If no, please explain.

NA

NA
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 10 of 12

Off-Site Material Treatment

If you treat off-site waste using biological degradation, please answer the following questions:

Please enter any other comments regarding off-site waste 

treatment here: NA

Do you perform any testing or other practices to 

determine whether fouling agents may be in the waste 

received?

NA

What method of off-site waste HAP reduction is used?

NA

How do you characterize the components of the waste 

products you receive that are treated with biological 

degradation?

NA

If "Other" or more than one of the above applies, 

please explain.
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 11 of 12

Startup and Shutdown Events

If no for any of the above, please explain:

Please provide the following information about all startup and shutdown events:

Process Vents

Tanks

1. What emissions source types experience startup and shutdown events?

Equipment Leaks

Transfer Systems

Organic and Oil-Water Separators

Containers

Surface Impoundments

Containers

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated portions of two provisions in the EPA’s CAA 

section 112 regulations governing the emissions of HAP during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM). Sierra 

Club v. EPA, 551 F.3d 1019 (D.C. Cir. 2008). Specifically, the Court vacated the SSM exemption contained in 40 CFR 63.6(f)(1) 

and 40 CFR 63.6(h)(1), that are part of a regulation, commonly referred to as the “General Provisions Rule,” that the EPA 

promulgated under section 112 of the CAA. When incorporated into CAA section 112(d) regulations for specific source 

categories, these two, now vacated, provisions exempted sources from the requirement to comply with the otherwise 

applicable CAA section 112(d) emission standard during periods of SSM. To be consistent with the Court’s decision, facilities 

must comply with the applicable standards at all times.

For each emission source type, do the annual emissions estimate in the Enclosure 2A "Emissions (TPY)" field include the 

annual emissions from startup and shutdown events that you added in the "STARTUP EMISSIONS (TPY)" and "SHUTDOWN 

EMISSIONS (TPY)" fields? Please enter a separate response for each emissions point type below:

For each emission source type, can you comply with the emissions limitation and/or work practices in the regulation that apply 

during normal operation during startup and shutdown events? Please enter a separate response for each emissions point type 

below:

Surface Impoundments

Tanks

Organic and Oil-Water Separators

Process Vents

Equipment Leaks

Transfer Systems
U.S. EPA Information Collection Request for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

Page 12 of 12

Startup and Shutdown Events

Please enter any other comments 

regarding startup or shutdown here:

6. How do you determine the HAP emissions during the event? 

7. How are control devices and work practices used to minmize emissions during 

the startup or shutdown event?

8. What compliance determination method(s) do you use during startup and 

shutdown events (e.g., monitor with CEMS)? 

1.c. How does the startup or shutdown event compare to normal 

operations (e.g., differences in flowrate, temp., pressure, alternate fuels 

used, alternate control devices used, etc.)?

1.a. Under normal operating conditions, do these emissions sources 

operate continuously?

9. During startup and shutdown events, if you cannot comply with the emissions 

limitation and/or work practices in the regulation that apply during normal 

operation, what is the minimum emissions level that could be achieved? 

9.c. How much would HAP emissions be reduced compared to an 

uncontrolled event? (If "emission factor" is used as basis for emissions 

estimate, please provide the emission factor and sources of the emission 

factor.1)

4. What marks the end of the startup or shutdown event?

2. How often do startup or shutdown events occur? 

3. What is the average and range of event duration?

1.d. How are emissions released to the atmosphere (e.g., through a 

pressure relief device)?

1.b. What triggers the equipment to experience a startup or shutdown 

event (e.g. hot startup, startup after an emergency shutdown, re-start, 

control device startup)?

9.a. Please describe how HAP emissions would be minimized.

9.b. How much would it cost to minimize HAP emissions in this manner?

1

 If "source test" is used as basis for emissions estimate, please provide a copy of the 

source test.

5. What safety issues are connected with a startup or shutdown event?
Enclosure 2a
Enclosure 2a

Page 1

Please complete this table for all OSWRO emission units. Please report all emissions related to the off-site waste handled and/or treated.

Facility Name

Emission 

Unit ID

Process 

ID

Emissio

n 

Release 

Point ID

SCC 

Code1

Emissions 

Start Date

Emissions 

End Date

Pollutant 

CAS 

Number2

Pollutant 

Name 

(include 

organic and 

non-organic 

pollutants)

Actual 

Emissio

ns (TPY)

MACTAllowable 

Emissions 

(TPY)3

Routine 

Emission

s Max 

Hourly 

(lbs/hr)

Startup 

Emissio

ns (TPY)

Startup 

Emissio

ns 

(lbs/hr)

Shutdo

wn 

Emissi

ons 

(TPY)

Shutdo

wn 

Emissio

ns 

(lbs/hr) MACT Source Category

Emission 

Release 

Point 

Type4 

Stack 

Height (ft)

Exit Gas 

Temperatu

re (°F)

Stack 

Diameter (ft)

Exit Gas 

Velocity 

(ft/sec)

Exit Gas 

Flow 

Rate 

(ft3/sec)

Fugitive 

Length (EW) (ft)

Fugitive 

Width (NS) (ft)

Fugitive 

Angle 

(degrees) 

5

Longitude 

(decimal 

degrees)6

Latitude 

(decimal 

degrees)6

Is 

Control 

Measur

e In 

Place?

Control 

Measur

e 7

Control 

Measur

e 

Efficien

cy Comments

Phillips 66 Ponca 

City Refinery NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

The Ponca City Refinery does 

receive off-site material that 

contains HAPs listed in 40 CFR 

63 Subpart DD. However, the 

amount of total HAP in the offsite waste received is less than 

1 Mg/yr. As such, per 40 CFR 

63.680(d), the refinery meets 

the criteria for the facility-wide 

exemption from the rule and so 

is not required to comply with 

the requirements of §§63.682 

through 63.699. 

1

 For SCC Code, please input one of the following codes:

SCC SCC Description

50310001 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Equipment Leaks 

50310002 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Containers

50310003 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Tanks

50310004 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Organic and Oil-Water Separators

50310005 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Surface Impoundments

50310006 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Transfer Systems

50310007 Waste Disposal, Solid Waste Disposal-Industrial, Non-TSDF Treatment, Storage, Disposal Processes, Process Vents

2

 See List of HAPs in separate worksheet for a table of CAS numbers and HAPs

3

 MACT- allowable emissions are the maximum emission levels allowed while in compliance with the MACT standards

4

 Emission point type choices include: fugitive, vertical, horizontal, goose neck, vertical with rain cap, or downward-facing vent

5

 Fugitive Angle: Specifies the rotation of the source from north (in the clockwise direction). The location coordinates should reflect the southwest corner of the area source as shown in this graphic: 

6 Location of stack or southwest corner of a fugitive emissions release point

7

 For control measures, please include all control measures used for that emission point, including but not limited to:

Activated Carbon 

Adsorption

list specific 

type in 

Control 

Measure 

Comments 

column

Combustor

list specific 

type in 

Control 

Measure 

Comments 

column

Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Fabric 

Filter/Baghouse

Flare

Pressurized Tank

Fixed Roof Tank

Fixed Roof Tank 

Vented to Control 

Device

External Floating 

Roof Tank

Fixed Roof Tank 

with Internal 

Floating Roof

Vapor Balancing

Floating Membrane 

Cover

Cover Vented to 

Control Device

High-Efficiency 

Particulate Air Filter 

(HEPA)

Leak Detection and 

Repair Program

Condenser

Scrubber

list specific 

type in 

Control 

Measure 

Comments 

column

Multiple Controls in 

Series

list specific 

types in 

Control 

Measure 

Comments 

column

Other Control 

Device

describe in 

Control 

Measure 

Comments 

column

(annual average if the parameter varies)

Vertical Emissions Release Point Parameters Fugitive Emissions Release 

Point Parameters
Enclosure 2a

Page 2

Pollution Prevention 

Technique

describe in 

Control 

Measure 

Comments 

column

Process 

Modification

describe in 

Control 

Measure 

Comments 

column
DRAFT

Pollutant Name CAS No.

Acetaldehyde 75070

Acetamide 60355

Acetonitrile 75058

Acetophenone 98862

2-Acetylaminofluorene 53963

Acrolein 107028

Acrylamide 79061

Acrylic acid 79107

Acrylonitrile 107131

Allyl chloride 107051

4-Aminobiphenyl 92671

Aniline 62533

o-Anisidine 90040

Asbestos 1332214

Benzene (including benzene from gasoline) 71432

Benzidine 92875

Benzotrichloride 98077

Benzyl chloride 100447

Biphenyl 92524

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) 117817

Bis(chloromethyl)ether 542881

Bromoform 75252

1,3-Butadiene 106990

Calcium cyanamide 156627

Captan 133062

Carbaryl 63252

Carbon disulfide 75150

Carbon tetrachloride 56235

Carbonyl sulfide 463581

Catechol 120809

Chloramben 133904

Chlordane 57749

Chlorine 7782505

Chloroacetic acid 79118

2-Chloroacetophenone 532274

Chlorobenzene 108907

Chlorobenzilate 510156

Chloroform 67663

Chloromethyl methyl ether 107302

Chloroprene 126998

Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers and mixture) 1319773

o-Cresol 95487

m-Cresol 108394

p-Cresol 106445

Cumene 98828

2,4-D, salts and esters 94757

DDE 3547044

Diazomethane 334883

Dibenzofurans 132649

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128

Dibutylphthalate 84742

1,4-Dichlorobenzene(p) 106467

3,3-Dichlorobenzidene 91941

Dichloroethyl ether (Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether) 111444

1,3-Dichloropropene 542756

Dichlorvos 62737

Diethanolamine 111422

N,N-Diethyl aniline (N,N-Dimethylaniline) 121697

List of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)
Pollutant Name CAS No.

List of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

Diethyl sulfate 64675

3,3-Dimethoxybenzidine 119904

Dimethyl aminoazobenzene 60117

3,3'-Dimethyl benzidine 119937

Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride 79447

Dimethyl formamide 68122

1,1-Dimethyl hydrazine 57147

Dimethyl phthalate 131113

Dimethyl sulfate 77781

4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, and salts 534521

2,4-Dinitrophenol 51285

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121142

1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide) 123911

1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 122667

Epichlorohydrin (l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane) 106898

1,2-Epoxybutane 106887

Ethyl acrylate 140885

Ethyl benzene 100414

Ethyl carbamate (Urethane) 51796

Ethyl chloride (Chloroethane) 75003

Ethylene dibromide (Dibromoethane) 106934

Ethylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloroethane) 107062

Ethylene glycol 107211

Ethylene imine (Aziridine) 151564

Ethylene oxide 75218

Ethylene thiourea 96457

Ethylidene dichloride (1,1-Dichloroethane) 75343

Formaldehyde 50000

Heptachlor 76448

Hexachlorobenzene 118741

Hexachlorobutadiene 87683

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77474

Hexachloroethane 67721

Hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate 822060

Hexamethylphosphoramide 680319

Hexane 110543

Hydrazine 302012

Hydrochloric acid 7647010

Hydrogen fluoride (Hydrofluoric acid) 7664393

Hydrogen sulfide 7783064

Hydroquinone 123319

Isophorone 78591

Lindane (all isomers) 58899

Maleic anhydride 108316

Methanol 67561

Methoxychlor 72435

Methyl bromide (Bromomethane) 74839

Methyl chloride (Chloromethane) 74873

Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-Trichloroethane) 71556

Methyl hydrazine 60344

Methyl iodide (Iodomethane) 74884

Methyl isobutyl ketone (Hexone) 108101

Methyl isocyanate 624839

Methyl methacrylate 80626

Methyl tert butyl ether 1634044

4,4-Methylene bis(2-chloroaniline) 101144

Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane) 75092

Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) 101688

4,4'¬-Methylenedianiline 101779

Naphthalene 91203
Pollutant Name CAS No.

List of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

Nitrobenzene 98953

4-Nitrobiphenyl 92933

4-Nitrophenol 100027

2-Nitropropane 79469

N-Nitroso-N-methylurea 684935

N-Nitrosodimethylamine 62759

N-Nitrosomorpholine 59892

Parathion 56382

Pentachloronitrobenzene (Quintobenzene) 82688

Pentachlorophenol 87865

Phenol 108952

p-Phenylenediamine 106503

Phosgene 75445

Phosphine 7803512

Phosphorus 7723140

Phthalic anhydride 85449

Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors) 1336363

1,3-Propane sultone 1120714

beta-Propiolactone 57578

Propionaldehyde 123386

Propoxur (Baygon) 114261

Propylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloropropane) 78875

Propylene oxide 75569

1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl aziridine) 75558

Quinoline 91225

Quinone 106514

Styrene 100425

Styrene oxide 96093

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 1746016

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79345

Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene) 127184

Titanium tetrachloride 7550450

Toluene 108883

2,4-Toluene diamine 95807

2,4-Toluene diisocyanate 584849

o-Toluidine 95534

Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene) 8001352

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79005

Trichloroethylene 79016

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062

Triethylamine 121448

Trifluralin 1582098

2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 540841

Vinyl acetate 108054

Vinyl bromide 593602

Vinyl chloride 75014

Vinylidene chloride (1,1-Dichloroethylene) 75354

Xylenes (isomers and mixture) 1330207

o-Xylenes 95476

m-Xylenes 108383

p-Xylenes 106423

Antimony Compounds 0

Arsenic Compounds (inorganic including arsine) 0

Beryllium Compounds 0

Cadmium Compounds 0

Chromium Compounds 0

Cobalt Compounds 0

Coke Oven Emissions 0
Pollutant Name CAS No.

List of Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP)

Cyanide Compounds 0

Glycol ethers 0

Lead Compounds 0

Manganese Compounds 0

Mercury Compounds 0

Fine mineral fibers 0

Nickel Compounds 0

Polycylic Organic Matter 0

Radionuclides (including radon) 0

Selenium Compounds 0
Other ICR 

Response Info.
Mail Code El 43-01 Return Receipt Requested

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711Ms. Kissell,

Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations (OSWRO) Information Collection

Phillips 66 Company, Ponca City Refinery

Enclosed, please find the Phillips 66 Company’s Ponca City Refinery response to the Agency’s

March 11, 2013 114 information request regarding the National Emissions Standards forHazardous Air Pollutants for Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations (OSWRO). Per theinstructions, this response is being provided on or before April 10, 2013. Please note that

although the request is dated March 11, 2013, it was not received by the facility until a week

later on March 18, 2013. The facility is providing the information it could reasonably gather in

the three week period.

The Ponca City Refinery notes that while it is a major facility for hazardous air pollutants as thatterm is used in the Clean Air Act, it is exempt from most of the requirements of the rule. This is

due to the very small quantities of materials it receives from off-site sources (see Appendix 1 of

this submittal). Additionally these materials are only received from other Phillips 66-owned or

contracted facilities and are limited to oil/water mixtures and occasionally off-spec refinedpetroleum products.

The specific quantity and nature of the off-site materials received and treated at the Ponca City

Refinery are reflected in the response provided. However, many of the questions included in

the 114 request are obviously geared to typical recovery facilities where larger quantities are

stored and treated within one or more affected units. Where the Ponca City Refinery has

determined that a question is not applicable to our operations we have noted this in our

response. For example, as noted above, the total mass of materials received on-site annuallyis less than 1 Mg, the regulatory threshold found in 40 CFR 63.680(d). Because less than 1 Mg

of materials is received on-site (See Appendix 2 of this submittal), the Ponca City Refinery is“exempt from the requirements of Secs. 63.682 through 63.699 [sic]”. Hence, none of the units

used to store or recycle the materials at the Ponca City Refinery are considered OSRWOregulated units.

The following is a summary of the Ponca City Refinery responses included in the tiles provided

by the Agency:

Enclosure 1.doc

• Completed

Enc 2.xlsx

• Owner Information worksheet — completed• Facility Information worksheet — completed rows 4 through 21. Rows 23 through 43 do

not apply.
Phillips 66’s approach in answering such questions is intended to be consistent with the

instruction in the request that noted:

If your facility does not have Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations, please respond as

soon as possible. We will review that in formation and respond as to whether you need tocomplete any other part of the survey.

Please feel free to contact Neta Hercyk at (580) 767-4182 or myself at (580) 767-2862 if you

have questions or need additional information.

Sincerely,

j

Dave H. Gamble PE
the provisions of this paragraph (d), the owner or operator must meet the requirements in

paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(3) of this section.

(1) The owner or operator must prepare an initial determination of the total annual HAP

quantity in the offsite material received at the plant site. This determination is based on

the total quantity of the HAP listed in Table 1 of this subpart as determined at the pointof-delivery for each offsite material stream.

(2) The owner or operator must prepare a new determination whenever the extent of

changes to the quantity or composition of the off-site material received at the plant sitecould cause the total annual HAP quantity in the offsite material received at the plant site

to exceed the limit of 1 megagram per year.

(3) The owner or operator must maintain documentation to support the owner’s or

operator’s determination of the total annual HAP quantity in the off-site material receivedat the plant site. This documentation must include the basis and data used fordetermining the HAP content of the off-site material.
Benzene 14,000 0.0000140Ethylbenzene 2,900 0.0000029Naphthalene (volatile) 1,100 0.0000011Naphthalene (semivolatile) 700 0.0000007

Toluene 27,000 0.0000270

o-Xylene 4,500 0.0000045

m-Xylene and p-Xylene 10,000 0.00001 00

Total 0.0000602

2012 Total wastewater

• volume 27,384 gallons

• density 8.34 lbs/gallon

• Annual HAP = (27,834 gallons) x (8.34 lbs/gallon) x (0.0000602 lbs

HAP/lb water) = 13.75 lbs = 0.01 megagrams

Jupiter Wastewater

Jupiter Wastewater Analysis 2

HAP ugIL Wt. Fraction

2-Butanone (MEK) 7.3 0.0000000073

2012 Total Jupiter wastewater

• volume = 2,635,200 gallons 3• density 8.34 lbs/gallon

• Annual HAP = (2,635,200 gallons) x (8.34 lbs/gallon) x (0.0000000073

lbs HAP/lb water) = 0.16 lbs = 0.00 megagrams

R&D West Wastewater

R&D West Wastewater Analysis

HAP ug/L Wt. Fraction Sample Date 4

Benzene 3,200 0.0000032 10/26/07

Ethylbenzene 690 0.0000007 10/26/07

Chloroform 280 0.0000003 10/26/07

Naphthalene 300 0.0000003 10/29/07

Toluene 29,000 0.0000290 10/26/07

m-Xylene and p-Xylene 4,700 0.0000047 10/26/07

o-Xylene 1,600 0.0000016 10/26/07

Total 0.0000398

12/30/03 sample determined to be worst case (i.e. maximum HAP content). 2 7/30/07 sample determined to be worst case (i.e. maximum HAP content).

5 GPM, 24 hours per day, 366 days per year.

Worst case (i.e. maximum HAP content)
• Tank Water Draw Wastewater from Phillips 66 Off-Site Transportation Facilities =

0.01 megagrams

• Jupiter Wastewater = 0.00 megag rams• R&D West Wastewater = 0.26 megagrams• Total Oft-Site Wastewater = 0.27 megagrams < 1 megagram

3.3 GPM, 24 hours per day, 366 days per year.