alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### S. S. King, *as Mayor, etc.,*v. Mary Mayhood.

No. 15,893.

*Mandamus*— Tax *Levy*— Payment *of a Judgment.*Mandamus held properly allowed to require a city to levy a tax to pay a judgment, the reasons given for a refusal being purely technical.

Error from Atchison district court; Benjamin F. Hudson, judge.

Opinion filed April 10, 1909.

Affirmed.

*W. A. Jackson,*and *Henry Elliston,*for the plaintiffs in error.

*C. S. Hull,*for the defendant in error.

*Per Curiam:*

This is a proceeding in error from an order awarding a mandamus against the mayor and council of Atchison requiring them to make provision for the payment of a judgment against the city. The objections urged to the proceedings are purely technical. No substantial reason is shown why such provision ought not to have been made sooner, or why it should not now be required, or why the damages allowed should be disturbed. The order of the trial ‘court is affirmed, but as some of the dates named therein for action to be taken have now passed the cause will be remanded that such changes may be made as to render it effective.
No. 40520.

#### Protest 876569-G of T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that gum locust bean powder was contained in linen bags, two bags being packed in a wooden case marked “Product of Spain,” no marking appearing on the bags. The importer sells the merchandise in this country by the case or some times it is emptied into kegs and sold that way. *Kraft*v. *United States*(22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103) was held not to apply. On the authority of *United States*v. *Monteverde*(C. A. D. 2), Abstract 39517, and *Lorillard*v. *United Stales*(24 C. C. P. A. 90, T. D. 48412) the protest was overruled.
# C_2014292EN.01003701.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2014 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-376/12) (1)

1

((EAGGF - ‘Guarantee’ section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Dried grapes - Wine - Expenditure incurred by Greece - One-off financial correction - Method of calculating - Nature of the procedure for clearance of accounts - Link with expenditure financed by the European Union))

2014/C 292/44

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: I. Chalkias, E. Leftheriotou and S. Papaïoannou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2012/336/EU of 22 June 2011 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2012 L 165, p. 83), in so far as that decision concerns the dried grapes sector, in respect of financial years 2007, 2008 and 2009, and the wine sector of the Hellenic Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Decision 2012/336/EU of 22 June 2011 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it imposes on the Hellenic Republic a one-off financial correction for the wine sector; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Decision 2012/336/EU of 22 June 2011 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) in so far as it imposes on the Hellenic Republic a one-off financial correction for the wine sector;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Alan L. Wells, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: October 29, 2009 |  | /s/ Alan L. Wells                              
|                       |  | Alan L. Wells                                  
|                       |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|                       |  | Principal Executive Officer                    
|                       |  | Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.         



49
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter63 of Title 18, United States Code) 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Global-Tech Advanced Innovations Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 20-F. 

Date: August 31, 2010 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Milnor, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6914.

Entry No. 898, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, April 10, 1942, etc.

Certified April 14, 1942, etc.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., December 9, 1942, etc.

(Decided February 24, 1947)

*Philip Stein*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402, (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 48135.

#### Protests 48536-K, etc., of Albers Bros. Milling Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the' protests.
#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6915.

Entry No. N-1151.

Invoice dated London, England, April 17, 1946.

Entered at Newark, N. J., May 9, 1946.

(Decided February 24, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

GREGORY FRANK SPEROW, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-56570 

D.C. No. 2:18-cv-01186-VAP-JEM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

GREGORY FRANK SPEROW, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-30035 

D.C. No. 1:06-cr-00126-BLW-2 

MEMORANDUM

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

FILED

FEB 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-56570 & 19-30035

Submitted February 4, 2020**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. 

In Appeal No. 18-56570, Gregory Frank Sperow appealed from the district 

court’s dismissal of his motion for return of property under Federal Rule of 

Criminal Procedure 41(g). In his reply brief, however, he requested to withdraw 

the appeal. We treat this request as a motion for voluntary dismissal. So treated, 

the motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).

In Appeal No. 19-30035, Sperow challenges the district court’s final order of 

forfeiture for the Mount Pleasant property. The government contends that this 

appeal is barred by a valid appeal waiver. We review de novo whether a defendant 

has waived his right to appeal. See United States v. Harris, 628 F.3d 1203, 1205 

(9th Cir. 2011). The terms of the appeal waiver in Sperow’s plea agreement 

unambiguously encompass the claims raised in this appeal. See id. The record 

belies Sperow’s contentions that the district court modified the terms of his plea 

agreement to exclude the Mount Pleasant property from forfeiture and that the 

government breached the plea agreement. The record further belies Sperow’s 

contention that he “provided complete and truthful cooperation” sufficient to 

trigger the government’s obligation not to seek final forfeiture of the Mount 

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
3 18-56570 & 19-30035

Pleasant property to the extent it was obtained through legitimate means. 

Accordingly, we do not reach the merits of Sperow’s challenge to the district 

court’s final order of forfeiture, but instead dismiss pursuant to the valid waiver. 

See id. at 1207.

Appeal Nos. 18-56570 & 19-30055: DISMISSED.
### [Note added: Red text is underlined.]



## Controls	and	Operating	Mechanisms Operable part. A component of a device or system used to insert or withdraw objects, or to activate, deactivate, adjust, or connect to the device or system. Operable parts include, but are not limited to, buttons, levers, knobs, smart card targets, coin and card slots, pull - cords, jacks, data ports, electrical outlets, and touch screens. **Scoping: the technical requirements apply to operable parts at wheelchair and transfer s eating**  **locations, restrooms, sleeping compartments, and dining and lounge car seating locations. If operable parts are provided for the public at any seating location, equivalent operable parts shall be provided**  **at wheelchair and transfer seating location s.**  **On intercity (Amtrak) train cars, c all buttons to**  **summon train personnel shall be provided at wheelchair and transfer seating locations, within sleeping**  **compartments and within restrooms. In sleeping compartments, controls for all lights and HVAC shal**  **l meet the technical requirements.**  **Technical requirements:**

 location. o The height of operable parts sh all be 610 mm (24 inches) minimum and 1220 mm (48 inches) maximum above the vehicle floor (see figure) . o The lateral position shall be a maximum of six inc hes in front of, or behind, the centerline of the wheelchair seating space and clear floor space in sleeping compartments . o Operable parts shall be 10 inches maximum from the vertical plane adjacent to the side of the wheelchair or mobility aid closest to t he operable part. o controls 12” minimum from inside corner (does not apply to manual door handle/latch for use when power fails) o Redundant controls are permitted (e.g., on a tethered or wireless remote ) . Operable parts shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching, or

twisting of the wrist. The force required to activate operable parts shall be 22.2 N (5 lb) maximum.  Power door buttons shall be 2 inches across minimum.  Controls shall meet section 508 standards  Controls sha ll be tactilely discernable without activation (e.g., raised buttons or have surrounding border raised 1/32 inch minimum)  Two -state controls (e.g., on/off, hi/low, etc.) shall provide visual and tactilely discernable indication of their state (e.g., toggle , pushbutton which remains depressed when activated).  Call button shall have audible and visual indication that call has been received/responded to. o Note: some buttons light up and buzz when activated, then flash and have intermittent tone or voice message when personnel answer.
#### Metasco Trading Corp., Globe Shipping Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6549.

Entry No. 740093, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, January 16, 1946, etc.

Certified January 17, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 21, 1946, etc.

(Decided November 25, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

Tiie appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I .find the export value as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the Report), I, Alan L. Wells, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                                                                                                                  
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2006 |  | /s/ Alan L. Wells                                                                                                
|                  |  | Alan L. Wells President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board Iowa Telecommunications Services,
Inc.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1704** 

FRANCIS AKINRO , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
CITY OF BALTIMORE ; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al
. , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Benson Everett Legg , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 01491

- BEL )

Submitted : August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010

Before MOTZ , GREGORY, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Francis Akinro appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his civil complaint . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. City of Baltimore , No. 1:10

- cv - 01491

- BEL (D. Md. June 7, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### LOU'S AUTO REPAIR, INC. v. August CHANDLER and Paul Speth.

No. 98-CC-2745.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Chandler, August; Speth, Paul; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Jefferson Second Parish Court of Jefferson Number 98-362; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number 98-CW-0945.

Denied.

VICTORY, J. not on panel.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  section  1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Interplay  Entertainment  Corp., a Delaware  corporation
(the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify with respect to the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December  31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report") that:

     (1)  the 10-K Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information  contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:    May 18, 2006

                                   /S/ HERVE CAEN
                                   -------------------------------
                                   Herve Caen
                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Interim Chief Financial Officer
### Served: March 1, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF WORLDWIDE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC.

FAADOCKETNO. [TOBEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0045


### NOTICE OFASSIGNMENTOFPROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009S0150216)has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding thisproceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAAHearing Docket,·and the other persons on the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List·Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 ONE COPY
Michael A. Honeycutt, President Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc:, 

### Respondent c/o JET I.C.U. 2561 Rescue Way Brooksville, FL34604 TEL: 325-796.-2540 FAX: 325-796-2549 William 

### P. Vines, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southern Region :federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0045 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal AviationAdministration, 600 IndePendence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
Exhibit 10.11

FIRST CLASS NAVIGATION CORPORATION

_____________, 2007

First Class Management S.A.

c/o NTC Company

22 Ethnikis Antistaseos Street

152 32 Halandri

Athens, Greece

Gentlemen:

This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of First Class Navigation Corporation (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of the consummation by the Company of a “Business Combination” or the Company’s liquidation (as described in the Company’s IPO prospectus) (the “Termination Date”), First Class Management S.A. shall make available to the Company certain office and secretarial services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 22 Ethnikis Antistaseos Street, 152 32 Halandri, Athens, Greece. In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay First Class Management S.A. the sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter
until the Termination Date.

 


	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        Very truly yours,
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        FIRST CLASS NAVIGATION CORPORATION
 
	
                          
 	
                         
 	
                        

                        By: 
 	
                          
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        Name: Alexandros Politis-Kalenteris
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        Title:   Chief Executive Officer
 




AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

FIRST CLASS MANAGEMENT S.A.

 


	
                        By:
 	
                          
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                          
 
	
                         
 	
                        Name:
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 
	
                         
 	
                        Title: