alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2083 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the Secretary 

of the Treasury from requiring that taxpayers reconcile amounts with 

respect to reportable payment transactions to amounts related to gross 

receipts and sales. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2012 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

the Secretary of the Treasury from requiring that taxpayers reconcile amounts with respect to reportable payment transactions to amounts related to gross receipts 

and sales. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘1099K Overreach Pre5 vention Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2083 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING RECONCILIATION OF 

2 AMOUNTS WITH RESPECT TO REPORTABLE 

3 PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS TO AMOUNTS RE4 LATED TO GROSS RECEIPTS AND SALES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6050W of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating sub7 section (g) as subsection (h) and inserting after subsection 

8 (f) the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(g) RECONCILIATION WITH RECEIPTS NOT RE10 QUIRED.—A taxpayer shall not be required to reconcile on 

11 any return of tax for a taxable year amounts with respect 

12 to reportable payment transactions, as furnished to the 

13 taxpayer pursuant to this section, to amounts related to 

14 gross receipts or sales.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

17 December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

July 22, 1997.
    The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has submitted the following 
public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Public Law 104-13. 
Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the OTS 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
OTS Clearance Officer, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before August 27, 
1997 to be assured of consideration.
    OMB Number: 1550-0084.
    Form Number: OTS Form 1586-A and 1586-I.
    Type of Review: Extension of an already approved collection.
    Title: Instructions for Filing Out the Interest-Rate Risk Appeals 
Submissions.
    Description: The two forms give savings association an opportunity 
to appeal their interest-rate risk component, which is determined by 
the Office of Thrift Supervision's interest-rate risk model.
    Respondents: Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks 
Holding Companies.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 6.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 15.5 hours on average.
    Frequency of Response: 11.
    Estimated Total Respondents Burden: 170 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Colleen M. Devine, (202) 906-6025, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226 New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.
Catherine C.M. Teti,
Director, Records Management and Information Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-19717 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
No. 42171.

#### Protest 972702-G of Westergaard Berg-Johnson Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The shrimp was packed in cans having the word “Norvege” embossed thereon, and a label bearing the legend “Norse Pearl Cocktail Shrimps, packed by the North Norway Canning & Fish Exporters, Ltd., Tromso, Norway” was pasted on a transparent paper covering the entire top of the can. On the authority of Abstract 24004 the marking on the tins in question was held insufficient as it was not in the English language and the marking •on the paper label pasted to the transparent paper covering of the cans was held mot a marking of the immediate containers of the sardines. *Hobe Button Co.*v. *United States*(12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 341, T. D. 40488) and *Asiam*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 68, T. D. 49065) distinguished.
No. 39237.

#### Petition 5584-R of Scharf Bros. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It appeared that the advance in value which resulted in the additional duties being assessed was principally occasioned by the addition by the appraiser of a 25 percent luxury tax. On the record it was found there was no intention on the part of petitioned to defraud the revenue or to conceal or misrepresent the facts in the case. The petition was therefore granted.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Broadwind Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephanie K. Kushner,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Stephanie K.  Kushner |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Stephanie K. Kushner      |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
|                      |
| Date: May 7, 2010    |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,593                     792
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  887,653                 440,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,596                   6,743
<INVENTORY>                                     52,566                  38,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               986,277                 518,256
<PP&E>                                       5,128,069               3,005,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                 686,909                 596,125
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,975,787               3,471,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,615,653               2,640,585
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,321,211                 386,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,975,787               3,471,835
<SALES>                                      3,542,823               3,310,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,623,571               3,458,310
<CGS>                                        3,115,037               2,965,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,255,391               3,146,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,359                 130,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,851                  52,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                147,364                  74,358
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (306,765)                  31,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            454,129                  43,329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   454,129                  43,329
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00                    0.00


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40555-40556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Meeting

DATE: Weeks of July 28, August 4, 11, and 18, 1997.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

Week of July 28

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of July 28.

Week of August 4--Tentative

Monday, August 4
2:00 p.m. Briefing by International Programs (Closed--Ex. 1)
3:00 p.m. Briefing on Investigative Matters (Closed--Ex. 5 & 7)
Wednesday, August 6
9:30 a.m. Meeting with Northeast Nuclear on Millstone (Public Meeting) 
Contact: Bill Travers, 301-415-1200)
2:00 p.m. Briefing on Shutdown Risk Proposed Rule for Nuclear Power 
Plants (Public Meeting) (Contact: Tim Collins, 301-415-2897)
3:30 p.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) if needed)
Thursday, August 7
9:30 a.m. Meeting with NRC Executive Council (Public Meeting) Contact: 
James L. Blaha, 301-415-1703)

Week of August 11--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of August 11.

Week of August 18--Tentative

Friday, August 22
11:30 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)

    Note: The schedule for Commission Meetings is subject to change 
on short notice.

[[Page 40556]]

To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 415-1292. 
Contact person for more information: Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.

    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm.
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, DC 20555 (301-415-1661).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet 
system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission 
meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87f0eaefc7e9f5e4a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d5a40456d435f4e034a425b">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc98978bbc928e9fd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6b2bda196b8a4b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 25, 1997.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
Secy Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20073 Filed 7-25-97; 2:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1796 Prepped byKeeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 69 ) VI-B-2 0 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:38 PM Sheet 69 of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 VI-B-2 0 Thi s documen t

ha s bee nmove dt o IV-D-33 3 a t th ereques t

o f th eprojec t officer . I t

wa s incorrectl y categoriz eoriginally .
Before the Third Division,

September 14, 1939

No. 42140.

#### Protests 994071-G, etc., of Saul Oliner et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with the collector’s statement that the currency of the respective invoices was erroneously converted the protests were sustained.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 197 6

_____________________________
D EAUNDRE B ERNARD W ALKER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. William E. Davis , Judge

. September 20, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , N ORDBY , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kathleen Pafford
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Zachary Lawton, Assistant Attorney General, Tall ahassee, for Appellee.
----

----

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                |   |                                                           |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                |   |                                                           |   |
|   |                                                |   |                                                           |   |
|   |                                                |   |                                                           |   |
| Date:  |       August 11, 2010 |   | /s/Sean C. Cutting                                             |   |
|   |                                                |   | Sean C. Cutting                                                |   |
|   |                                                |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                          |   |
|   |                                                |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                  |   |
|   |                                                |   |                                                           |   |
|   |                                                |   |                                                           |   |
| Date:  |     August 11, 2010             |   | /s/Mary Dieter Smith                                           |   |
|   |                                                |   | Mary Dieter Smith                                              |   |
|   |                                                |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer           |   |
|   |                                                |   | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
Exhibit 10.5


                           GreenMan Technologies, Inc.
                        Addendum to Employment Agreement

WHEREAS, the Company and Lyle Jensen entered an Employment Agreement on April
12, 2006;

WHEREAS, the Company desires to make certain changes to the Employment
Agreement;

WHEREAS, Lyle Jensen will consider certain changes to the Employment Agreement;

WHEREAS, Paragraph 11.2 of the Employment Agreement provides for amending said
Employment Agreement if both parties concur and sign in writing;

NOWTHEREFORE, the following changes have been mutually agreed to:

1.    Paragraph 5.2 Base Salary

      The base salary will change to $ 20,833.33 per month or $250,000.00 per
      year starting October 1, 2007. The amount of any salary in arrears will be
      paid in the next regularly scheduled pay-period following the date below.

2.    Paragraph 5.4 a)   Annual Financial Performance Incentive

      The body of Paragraph 5.4 a) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with
      the following:

      a)    Annual Financial Performance Incentive: The Employee shall be
            eligible to receive financial performance incentive compensation
            ("financial performance compensation") equal to twenty percent (
            20%) of the audited annual profit after tax as reported in the
            Company's 10K filing. The Financial Performance Compensation will be
            limited to a maximum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($
            150,000.00)in any given fiscal year period.

      There being no other changes, the balance of the Employment Agreement
remains unchanged.

      BY SIGNATURE BELOW, the Parties hereby mutually agree to the amendment as
described herein,

      Employee                            Company

      /s/ Lyle E. Jensen                  /s/ Lew Boyd
      -------------------                 ------------
      Lyle E. Jensen                      Lew Boyd
      CEO                                 Chairman of the Compensation Committee

      Date: January 30, 2008
# C_2013260EN.01002001.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 13 May 2013 — Elena Recinto-Pfingsten v Swiss International Air Lines AG

(Case C-259/13)

2013/C 260/34

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elena Recinto-Pfingsten

Applicant:

Defendant: Swiss International Air Lines AG

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the Agreement (1) on air transport between the Swiss Confederation and the European Community of 21 June 1999, as amended by Decision No 2/2010 (2) of the Community/Switzerland Air Transport Committee of 26 November 2010, to be interpreted as meaning that Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (3) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, is applicable, in accordance with Article 3(1)(a), also to passengers who embark on a flight to a third country from airports in Switzerland?

1

2

3

---

(1)  Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Final Act — Joint Declarations — Information relating to the entry into force of the seven Agreements with the Swiss Confederation in the sectors free movement of persons, air and land transport, public procurement, scientific and technological cooperation, mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment, and trade in agricultural products (OJ 2002 L 114, p. 73).

1

(2)  Decision No 2/2010 of the Joint Community/Switzerland Air Transport Committee set up under the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport of 26 November 2010 replacing the Annex to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (OJ 2010 L 347, p. 54).

2

(3)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

3

---
Summary of Director Compensation Program



 Exhibit 10.39 
 PHARMERICA CORPORATION 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN 
 Annual Retainer: Each non-employee director will receive an annual retainer of $35,000. 
 Chairman Retainer: The non-employee chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual retainer of $15,000 per year. 
 Committee Chair Retainer: The chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee will receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000. The
chairman of the Compensation Committee will receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000. The chairman of the Audit Committee receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000. 
 Board Meeting Fee: Non-employee directors will receive $2,000 for each meeting of the board attended. 
 Committee Meeting Fee: Non-employee committee members will receive $1,500 for each committee meeting attended. 
 Initial Stock Option Grant: Upon joining the board of directors, each non-employee director will receive a one-time award of stock options valued
at $120,000. Such stock options will vest in three equal annual installments. 
 Annual Restricted Stock Grant: Each non-employee
director will receive an annual award of restricted stock valued at $80,000. Such restricted stock will vest in three equal annual installments. 
 Exceptions: Directors Paul J. Diaz and R. David Yost agreed not to receive any compensation for their board service.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John B. Allen, Jr., Appellant.

[614 NYS2d 949]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with defendant that his purported waiver, as part of his guilty plea, of his right to appeal on constitutional double jeopardy grounds was invalid *(see, People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 280; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 9; *see also, People v Michael,*48 NY2d 1, 7). On the merits, however, we conclude that the court properly granted the People’s earlier motion for a mistrial based on manifest necessity *(see,*CPL 280.10 [3]; *Matter of Enright v Siedlecki,*59 NY2d 195, 199-201). The court’s reliance on medical information that a key prosecution witness had suffered a massive heart attack was proper *(see, Hall v Potoker,*49 NY2d 501, 507). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—Criminal Possession Weapon, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.