alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") to
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Veronica Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
July 20, 2009




/s/
      Veronica ChenVeronica
      Chen
                    Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Infinity  Capital Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Gregory
H. Laborde, Principal Executive Officer,  President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 12, 2010


/s/Gregory H. Laborde
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory H. Laborde, Principal Executive Officer, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                 SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, 1997 AND 1996


                                                1998         1997        1996
                                             ----------   ----------  ----------
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding                          4,213,482    4,168,111   4,175,728
                                             ==========   ==========  ==========

Income (loss) from continuing operations     $ (589,887)  $  237,709  $  197,591
                                             ==========   ==========  ==========

Basic earnings (loss) per share -
 continuing                                  $     (.14)  $      .06  $       05

Net income (loss)                            $ (589,887)  $  237,709  $  508,683
                                             ==========   ==========  ==========

Basic earnings (loss) per share              $     (.14)  $      .06  $      .12


DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Average number of common shares outstanding   4,213,482    4,168,111   4,175,728

Incremental shares attributable to
  warrants/options                                   --      529,831   1,167,877
                                             ----------   ----------  ----------

Total shares used in the calculation          4,213,482    4,697,942   5,343,605
                                             ==========   ==========  ==========

Income (loss) from continuing operations     $ (589,887)  $  237,709  $  197,591
                                             ==========   ==========  ==========

Diluted earnings (loss) per share -
 continuing                                  $     (.14)  $      .05  $      .04

Net income (loss)                            $ (589,887)  $  237,709  $  508,683
                                             ==========   ==========  ==========

Diluted earnings (loss) per share            $     (.14)  $      .05  $      .10
#### Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6600.

Entry No. 754133.

Invoice dated London, England, April 8, 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 9, 1942.

(Decided December 11, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ekwall, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19895]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new, and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before September 29, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 
Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, S.W., Suite 5000, 
Washington, D.C. 20416. Phone Number: 202-205-6629.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: ``Customer Survey''.
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Form No: N/A.
    Description of Respondents: Participating SBA Lenders and 
Participants in SBA Programs.
    Annual Responses: 13,800.
    Annual Burden: 2,300.
    Comments: Send all comments regarding this information collection 
to Patricia Holden, Management Analyst, Office of Field Operations, 
Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, S.W., Suite 7125, 
Washington, D.C. 20416. Phone No: 202-205-6385. Send comments regarding 
whether this information collection is necessary for the proper 
performance of the function of the agency, accuracy of burden estimate, 
in addition to ways to minimize this estimate, and ways to enhance the 
quality.

    Dated: July 22, 1997.
Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-19895 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2015213EN.01001201.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/12

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Suceava — Romania) — Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Botoşani v Evangeli Paraskevopoulou

(Case C-668/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Identical question referred - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 7(2)(c) - Applicability of social security conventions between Member States - Repatriated refugee whose country of origin is a Member State - Completion of periods of employment in the territory of another Member State - Application for grant of an old-age benefit - Refusal))

(2015/C 213/17)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Suceava

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Botoşani

Applicant:

Defendant: Evangeli Paraskevopoulou

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 7(2)(c) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, in the version amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1992/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that a bilateral agreement, relating to the social security benefits of nationals of one of the signatory States having had the status of political refugees in the territory of the other signatory State, concluded on a date when one of the two signatory States had not yet acceded to the European Union and not appearing in Annex III to that regulation, does not continue to apply to the situation of political refugees repatriated to their State of origin before the bilateral agreement was concluded and that regulation entered into force.

---

(1)  OJ C 85, 22.3.2014.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19811]



[[Page 40335]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[C-337-802]


Notice of Postponement of Time Limit for Countervailing Duty 
Investigation: Fresh Atlantic Salmon From Chile

AGENCY: International Trade Administration/Import Administration/
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 28, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosa Jeong or Marian Wells, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Room 3099, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1278 or 482-6309, 
respectively.

Postponement

    On July 2, 1997, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
initiated the countervailing duty investigation of Fresh Atlantic 
Salmon from Chile. Respondents have indicated that they will be 
cooperating in the investigation. In addition, we are investigating a 
large number of potentially complex alleged countervailable subsidy 
practices. Accordingly, as detailed in our July 15, 1997, Memorandum to 
the File, we deem this investigation to be extraordinarily complicated. 
Therefore, pursuant to section 703(c)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (``the Act''), we are postponing the preliminary determination 
in this investigation no later than November 10, 1997.
    This notice is published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act.

    Dated: July 18, 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-19811 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Form 10-QSB), I, Patrick D. OBrien, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 19, 2005 /s/ Patrick D. OBrienPatrick D. OBrien
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Broadwind Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Cameron Drecoll,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ J. Cameron Drecoll        |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| J. Cameron Drecoll            |   |
| Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|                          |   |
|                          |   |
| Date: November 14,  2008 |   |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-66620), (No. 333-66123), (No. 333-66121), (No.
333-66119) and (No. 033-63865) of ATC Healthcare, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our
report dated April 16, 2004, except for the last paragraph of Note 7 (a) as to
which the date is May 28, 2004, relating to the February 29, 2004 financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.


/s/Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP
Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP

New York, New York
November 3, 2004


                                       40
EXHIBIT 10.1

                             Joint Filing Agreement

     Agreement dated as of February 28, 2000, between LeAnna Sidhu and Catalyst
Capital LLC (collectively, the "Parties").

     Each of the Parties hereto represents to the other Parties that it is
eligible to use Schedule 13D to report its beneficial interest in shares of
common stock, $.0001 par value per share, of youticket.com inc. owned of record
by LeAnna Sidhu and Catalyst Capital LLC ("Schedule 13D"), and it will file the
Schedule 13D on behalf of itself.

     Each of the Parties agrees to be responsible for the timely filing of the
Schedule 13D and any and all amendments thereto and for the completeness and
accuracy of the information concerning itself contained in the Schedule 13D, and
the other Parties to the extent it knows or has reason to believe that any
information about the other Parties is inaccurate.

                                      Catalyst Capital LLC

                                      /s/  LeAnna Sidhu
                                      ---------------------------
                                      By: LeAnna Sidhu, Authorized Signatory

                                      /s/ LeAnna Sidhu
                                      -----------------------------
                                          LeAnna Sidhu
**Exhibit 21**

AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC. AND ITS
SUBSIDIARIESSUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Name
    
    Jurisdiction in which
      incorporatedTempress
      Systems, Inc.
    
    State of
      TexasTempress
      Holdings B.V.
    
    The
      NetherlandsTempress Systems
      B.V.
    
    The
      NetherlandsTempress
      Manufacturing B.V.
    
    The
      NetherlandsTempress
      Engineering B.V.
    
    The
      NetherlandsTempress
      Onroerend Goed B.V.
    
    The
      NetherlandsP.R. Hoffman
      Machine Products, Inc.
    
    State of
      ArizonaBruce
      Technologies, Inc.
    
    State of
      MassachusettsBruce
      Technologies Europe GmbH
    
    Federal Republic
      of GermanyR2D Ingenierie
      SAS
    
    France
#### Aetna Felt Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6575.

Entry No. 739117, etc.

Invoices dated Bradford, England, January 7, 1942, etc.

Certified January 7, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 19, 1942, etc.

(Decided December 5, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, 'Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 84945 

# ED

JUL 13 20
EL OLE BY 

# [1

-= IN THE SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF THE RESIGNATION OF PAULM.MEADOR, BAR NO. 4121.

HIEF DEPUTYCLERK

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONFORRESIGNATION This is ajoint petitionby the State Bar ofNevada and attorney Paul M. Meador for his resignation from the Nevada bar.

SCR 98(5)provides that Nevada attorneys who are not actively practicing law in this state may resign from the state bar if certain conditions are met. The petition includes statements from state bar staff confirming that no disciplinary, fee dispute arbitration, or client security fund matters are pending against Meador; and that he is current on all membership fee payments and other financial commitments relating to his practice oflaw in this state. See SCR 98(5)(a)(1)-(2).

Bar counsel has recommended that the resignation be approved, and the Board of Governors has approved the application for resignation. See SCR 98(5)(a)(2). Meador acknowledges that his resignation is irrevocable and that the state bar retains continuing jurisdiction withrespect tomattersinvolvingapast member'sconductprior to resignation. See SCR 98(5)(c)-(d). Finally, Meador has submitted an affidavit ofcompliance with SCR 115. See SCR 98(5)(e).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 64001, 

## 1,1,- 11 0

## 27The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5).

Accordingly, we approve attorney Paul M. Meador's resignation. SCR 98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted.

It is so ORDERED.

cc: Bar Counsel, State Bar ofNevada Paul M. Meador Executive Director Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A Mfatiz 2
(Reap. Dec. 9716)

#### Joseph A. Paredes & Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. CE 937.

(Decided May 26, 1960)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the instant appeal consists of binoculars and leather carrying cases which, in *John P. Herber & Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*C.D. 1519, this court held to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of the binoculars and cases.

> 2. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities, in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States were the following unit prices plus the proportionate share of packing and cases, inland freight, insurance premium, hauling and handling, storage, and pettys, the foreign value of such or similar merchandise being no higher.

> Item Binoculars Case

> 6x30_$11.60 $2.00

> 8x30_ 11.60 2.00

> 8 x 30 center focus_ 12.40 2.00

> 8x40_ 12.95 1.90

> 7 x 35 center focus_ 12.65 1.75

> *7373. The instant appeal for reappraisement is limited to the items hereinbefore enumerated and abandoned in all other respects and the said appeal submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values for the items covered by the appeal herein were the following unit prices, plus the proportionate share of packing and cases, inland freight, insurance premium, .hauling and handing, storage, and pettys.

> Item Binoculars Case

> 6x30_$11.50 $2.00

> 8 x 30- 11. 50 2.00

> 8 x 30 center focus_ 12.40 2. 00

> 8x40_ 12.95 1.90

> 7 x 35 center focus_ 12. 65 1.75

This appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# jfourtf)**Court of** **Antonio, August** **1,2014 No.04-13-00358-CR** **Perla Judith** **Pena, Appellant** **v. The** **State of** **Texas, Appellee** **Trial Court** **Case No. 12-CRS-440** 

### ORDER**The Court** **has reviewed** **the record** **and briefs** **in this appeal** **and has** **determined that** **oral argument** **will not** **significantly aid** **it in** **determining the** **legal and** **factual issues** **presented in** **the appeal.** **See Tex.** **R. App.** **P. 39.8.** **Therefore, all** **requests for** **oral argument** **are denied,** **and the** **cause is** **advanced for** **ON BRIEFS** **submission on** **September 10,** **2014, to** **the following** **panel: Justice** **Marion, Justice** **Barnard, and** **Justice Chapa.** **AH parties** **will be** **notified of** **the Court's** **decision in** **this appeal** **in accordance** **with Tex.** **R. App.** **P. 48.** **Either party** **may file** **motion requesting** **the Court** **to reconsider** **its determination** **that**

### oral**argument will** **not significantly** **aid the** **Court in** **determining the** **legal and** **factual issues** **presented in** **the appeal.** **See Tex.** **R. App.** **P. 39.8.** **Such motion** **should be** **filed within** **ten (10)** **days from** **the date** **of this** **order. It** **is so** **ORDERED on** **August 1,2014.** **Sandee Marion,** **Justice**

## IN**WITNESS WHEREOF,** **have hereunto** **set my** **hand and** **a/fixed the** **seal o/the** **said court** **on this** **August 1,** **2014.**