alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9624)

#### Kussi & Feigl, Inc. Globe Shipping Co., Inc. v. United States

Entry No. 727009.

(Decided March 4, 1960)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiffs. ■ '

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation of submission, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the instant appeal for reappraisement is limited to the following items and is abandoned in all other respects:

> 933 Coulants

> 934 Coulants

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that as so limited the issues are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in *Bert Friedberg & Company*v. *United States,*Reappt. Dec. 8590 and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> *597. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the prices at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States were the appraised unit values less 15.35% plus 1.01%.

In tlie cited case, the court held foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise there under consideration, and that such statutory value did not include the so-called “French sole or unique tax.”

On the agreed facts and following the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is statutory foreign value, and hold that such value for the items in question is the appraised unit values, less 15.35 per centum, plus 1.01 per centum.

The appeal for reappraisement is dismissed as to all other merchandise.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2239 

To direct the head of each agency to treat relevant military training as 

sufficient to satisfy training or certification requirements for Federal licenses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2012 

Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the head of each agency to treat relevant military 

training as sufficient to satisfy training or certification 

requirements for Federal licenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veteran Skills to Jobs 

5 Act of 2012’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2239 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF RELEVANT MILITARY TRAINING AS 

2 SUFFICIENT TO SATISFY TRAINING OR CER3 TIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL 

4 LICENSES. 

5 The head of each agency (as defined under section 

6 551 of title 5, United States Code) shall deem an appli7 cant for a license issued by the agency who has received 

8 relevant training while serving as a member of the Armed 

9 Forces, as determined by the head of the agency, to have 

10 satisfied any training or certification requirements for the 

11 license, unless the head of the agency determines that the 

12 training received by the applicant is substantially different 

13 from the training or certification required for the license. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Longines Wittnauer Watch Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7850.

Entry No. 715682, etc.

(Decided June 26, 1950)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawRence, Judge:

It bas been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these appeals are the same inwall material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the annexed schedule, which is marked *“A”*and made a part of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### John William HUNT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-3641.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 4, 1998.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Maria E. Lauredo, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Maya Saxena, Fort Lauderdale, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

*CONFESSION OF ERROR*

PER CURIAM.

The appellant argues, the state concedes, and we hold that the inability of the court reporter to prepare transcripts of the trial and the stipulated impossibility of reconstructing the record require reversal of the judgment of conviction and remand for a new trial. *Fairell v. State,*662 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); *Felton v. State,*523 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); *Rozier v. State,*669 So.2d 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); *Jackson v. State,*308 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). It is so ordered.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 383]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ383.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1459]]

Public Law 106-383
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Smithsonian Institution to plan, design, construct, and 
   equip laboratory, administrative, and support space to house base 
 operations for the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Submillimeter 
Array located on Mauna Kea at Hilo, Hawaii. <<NOTE: Oct. 27, 2000 -  [S. 
                                2498]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 20 USC 50 note.>> FACILITY AUTHORIZED.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized to 
plan, design, construct, and equip laboratory, administrative, and 
support space to house base operations for the Smithsonian Astrophysical 
Observatory Submillimeter Array located on Mauna Kea at Hilo, Hawaii.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 20 USC 50 note.>> AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the Board of Regents of 
the Smithsonian Institution to carry out this Act, $2,000,000 for fiscal 
year 2001, and $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2002, which shall remain 
available until expended.

    Approved October 27, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2498:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            June 14, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 17, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
No. 47745.

#### Protests 643690-G, etc., of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following *United States*v. *Schapiro*(24 C. C. P. A. 343, T. D. 48771) certain of the merchandise in question was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1750 in accordance with the percentages of paper stock rags as set forth in schedule attached to stipulation entered into between counsel.
#### In the Matter of Vidal W., Appellant. Monroe County Attorney, Respondent.

[701 NYS2d 225]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in directing respondent’s placement with the Office of Children and Family Services in a limited secure facility. The evidence at the dispositional hearing establishes that respondent has problems with drug use and assaultive behavior and is in need of psychiatric counseling, educational services and a structured environment. The evidence further establishes that those problems and needs can be addressed most effectively in a limited secure facility. The proposal of respondent that he enter the Job Corps as soon as he is old enough does not address his need for psychiatric counseling and drug treatment, and, in any event, there is no evidence that he would be accepted into that program. We conclude, therefore, that the court properly adopted the least restrictive available alternative consistent with the needs and best interests of respondent and the need for protection of the community (see, Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; *Matter of Katherine*W., 62 NY2d 947, 948; *Matter of Willie J. H.,*258 AD2d 938). (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Miller, J. — Juvenile Delinquency.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1179-DR]


Texas; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Texas, (FEMA-1179-DR), dated July 7, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 16, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Texas, is hereby amended to include the following areas among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 
7, 1997:
    Comal, Eastland, and Edwards Counties for Individual Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Catherine H. Light,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-19795 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
{ 

RuLE.240 

4!'.( • 

(, 

J. · Co~oli~~cc Vc~ific~tion 

As ~ co~ditio~ o~ ~ 

(1) ·sa~d pe::rnit co~citio~s 

.. .. . 

·'( '' . . aJ, 'I'hat t.'1c rne;:-..~t:::!.~g inst:::-\.:.~cntc r..cc~ minimc..01 

·· . ~. :o\Ca&t:::·c.-:oc:ot ~cct:r~cy, C<llibration p::-occc~.:::-e and 

· ·._.:"=\i!que:ncy as cpcc.i!io~ !:>y th~ co:-.·.:::-ol Of~ icc::-. . ·.· .··· . , ·, 

a:;"tunc!.:l.::--cc 

ca.:::.~:-at!.o;-. 

o£ .. 

:(b)· . ·r~at t"he r\i!co:cing 

c~all bo installed ~n ~ 

ncct:icn 

loca~io:o 

o~ J~c~ ~e~su=i~; i~st~~"~~i~ 

su~jcc~ to fre~ucnt opc:::-~to= 

(2.) 

{3) 

. . 

{~-) 

.... 

. (6) 

ta~rvoilla;.ce o:: bo oquippcd wit~~ !;~.itu~lo ulu:7.i c!avicc5. 

Tho in~o::-rn~tion rcco~dcd !;~u.ll bo st:.-;utia::-.i~cd a.~d. rcpo:::-ted 

a~d--fo::-~· uc p::-c~c=~~cd by t~~0 co~~=\ 'to t.'1CDTst:::ict: 

of;:icc::. 

. ...., ....... 

r.ourccs 

Eiili!.nion data ·obtained f~o~ ovmc:::-s or O?c::-a torn of station'-~ 

vriil be co=:?cY~."tc<:! .,.,ft-b a??ffca1Jfcc;;lf5!.-f0:.-rrrili:; -.:{onz- ~:-.d oth"Ci:=-cO..t:::ol r:-.c.:\~urc!; 4.41d w{il bo "'vailahlc to -t:~c p·_.S-1-ic 

ou::i:1g nor.:.al-b~si"";1c~!:; -~ou:-s~f~~ni"Zt.3cto:':=lco, or i~::l-:.:tcc 

to E?A or £~n~~~~-~cduc~t. 

Y.o~itori:og recorda . ·-·~ 

. -oo=iod ... o: ~ot lc!;s th~~ 

__ . _..... __ . 

cball be rct~i~cd 

two ycarc .. I 

I 

. . 

by tilo 

~~c~=i~g 

Dizt.::ic~ po::.::;on:-.ol ·~~ro ~o i:-.cpcct. ahc! con!i= c~li~::<lt:io:e o~ 

L~ctr~ontc,.~o ~ccoc!;~ry • 

~,Y viol~tion of ~n 

·~o 

·s"t\lnC~rd, o= !l::-~::AkCow:-1 of c:ni~G.io~ :-:.~~~ur iu~ in:; t::.:-U.'lt::!;-.tc, iz to 

Rulo 

~~port~d to t~e Dictrict in accorcanco with tho prov~sionc o= 5~0, E~uip~ent Drc~kclo~.
EXHIBIT 10.3

                          Nuevo Financial Center, Inc.

                              NOTICE OF CONVERSION

      The undersigned hereby elects to convert principal under the 10%
Convertible Promissory Note of Nuevo Financial Center, Inc., due on April 1,
2007, into shares of common stock, no par value per share (the "Common Stock"),
of the Company according to the conditions hereof, as of the date written below.
If shares are to be issued in the name of a person other than the undersigned,
the undersigned will pay all transfer taxes payable with respect thereto and is
delivering herewith such certificates and opinions as reasonably requested by
the Company in accordance therewith. No fee will be charged to the holder for
any conversion, except for such transfer taxes, if any.

Conversion calculations:
                                 Date to Effect Conversion: April 24, 2006

                                 Principal Amount of Debenture to be Converted:

                                 Payment of Interest in Common Stock: yes __ no

                                 Number of shares of Common Stock to be issued:


                                 Signature:
                                            ------------------------------------

                                 Name:
                                       -----------------------------------------

                                 Address:
                                          --------------------------------------
No. M-23.

#### Doe *v.*Grievance Administrator, Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari using a pseudonym denied.
#### WALTON v. WEST.

April 29, 1837.

*Exceptions to Auditor's Report.*

On a sheriff’s sale of real estate, the owner of a rent charge on the same is not entitled, oat of the proceeds of sale, to rent which accrues after the day of sale, and before the confirmation of the deed.

THIS was a *venditioni exponas*to September term, 1835, No. 227. The property named in the writ was sold by the sheriff on the 23d September, 1835, it being subject to an annual rent charge. The sheriff’s deed was acknowledged on April 26th, 1836, there having been opposition to the sale, and a motion made to set it aside, which was eventually refused. The purchase money was paid into court, and an auditor was appointed to distribute the same. The owner of the rent charge claimed out of the fund the six months rent which had accrued in the interim, between the sale and its confirmation by the court. The auditor disallowed this claim, and exception to his decision on this point was taken.

*92This exception was argued by

*S. G, T. Campbell,*for the exceptant, and

*J. M. Read,*contra.

Per Curiam.

Rent accruing on a charge created by deed, is a lien having priority out of the fund to all liens which attach subsequent to the creation of the charge. It has been held, that a judicial sale divests the property in the hands of the purchaser of all liens, except where provision is made to the contrary by act of assembly, and all claims on the estate up to the time of sale, are turned over to the fund. *After*the sale, the property in the hands of the purchaser is liable to rent accruing, the covenant running with the land. The fund, as to all matters *antecedent*to the sale, is substituted for the land, and the litigation of that fund in court, can give the owner no better claim on it for rent accruing after the sale, than it could give to the holder of a judgment for interest accruing after the date of sale, and before the confirmation of the deed, which is inadmissible.

Exception dismissed.
#### Esspi Glove Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6595.

Entry No. 708990, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke under Ham, England, August 1943, etc.

Certified August 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 24, 1943, etc.

(Decided December 10, 1946)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for. reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the,parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be .the. proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 40567.

#### Protest 570080-G of English Antique Shop (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of candlesticks and snuffers of metal plated with silver chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 339 was' therefore sustained.
No. 46525.

#### Petition 6129-R of L. Oppleman, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It appeared from the record that the advance represents a 20 percent home consumption tax. At the hearing it appeared that the president of the petitioning corporation testified that when his entered value was questioned by the examiner he called on that customs official and explained that he had followed his former custom of entering at the invoice price, which custom had been uniformly accepted by the appraiser, and referred the customs official to the case of *United States*v. *Willoughby Camera Stores*(21 C. C. P. A. 322, T. D. *30946851) which, held tripods not to be parts of cameras and therefore not subject to the Japanese home consumption tax on cameras and parts thereof. He cabled for a copy of the Japanese law regarding such tax and upon receipt submitted it to the appraiser, which report revealed that tripods were provided for therein as parts of cameras. From an examination of the record the court was satisfied that the entry was made without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ixia Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
November 7, 2007
    
    /s/ Errol GinsbergErrol GinsbergChief Executive OfficerDate:
November 7, 2007
    
    /s/ Thomas B. MillerThomas B. MillerChief Financial Officer
 29
# C_2015363EN.01000501.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö — Sweden) — Bricmate AB v Tullverket

(Case C-569/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Commercial policy - Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in China - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 - Validity - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Articles 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 3(6), 17 and 20(1) - Determination of the injury and of the causal link - Errors of fact and manifest errors of assessment - Obligation to exercise due care - Examination of the evidence sent by a sampled importer - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence))

(2015/C 363/05)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bricmate AB

Applicant:

Defendant: Tullverket

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the question referred for a preliminary ruling has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 of 12 September 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China.

---

(1)  OJ C 15, 18.1.2014.

1

---
No. 43273.

#### Protest 995400-G of H. D. Feuer (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The plaintiff failed to prove the country of origin of the alexandrite stones in this case but the court held that if they were found and cut or manufactured in the portion of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics known as Siberia they would not be legally marked with the word “Siberia” alone, within the provisions of article 628 (6), Customs Regulations of 1937. The protest was therefore overruled. Abstract 40292 followed.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002,  each  of  the  undersigned   officers  of  Hugo
International Telecom, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the Six months
          ended  June  30,  2004  (the   "Report")   fully   complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



By:            /S/ Kevin Kreisler
               --------------------------------
                   Kevin Kreisler
                   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Date:              January 24, 2006


This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.