T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KI R K M. C AR MI C HA E L ; DA WN D. CARM I CHAEL, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. W A S H I N G T O N M U T U A L B A N K , F .A .; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 56251 D. C . No . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 1 3 5 1 - J AH P OR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . H ous t on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry11, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. K i rk M . C arm i chae l and D aw n D . C arm i chae l appeal pro se f rom the di stri ct c o u rt’s o r d e rd is m is s in g th e ira c tio n a r is in g o u t o f f o r e c lo s u r e p r o c e e d in g s . W e



# FI LED FEB 14 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 56251 2 ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo adi s m i s s a l f or f a ilu r e to s ta te ac la im . Kin gv . Ca lifo rn ia , 7 8 4 F .2 d9 1 0 , 9 1 2 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 6 ) . W e a f f i rm. Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yd i s mi s s e dth e w r o n g f u l f o r e c l o s u r e c l a i ms be c aus e J P M or ga n C ha s e B a nk ( “ C ha s e ” ) ha d s t a tut oryauthor i tyt o i ni t i a t e nonju d ic ia l f o r e c lo s u r e p r o c e e d in g s . See C a l. C iv . C o d e § 2 9 2 4 ( a ) ( 1 ) ; see a l so Moel lerv. L i en , 30 C a l . Rptr . 2d 777, 782 ( C t . A pp. 1994) ( “ U pon de f aul tbythe trust or, the benefi ci ary m aydecl ar e adefaul tand p roce ed w i th a no nj ud i ci al fore cl osure s al e. ”) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d the c l a i m s a ga i ns tC ha s e ba s e d on a l l e ga t i ons of

w r ongf ul c onduc tbyW a s hi ngt on M utua l B a nk be c aus e , unde rthe P u r c h a s e a n d A s s u m p tio n A g r e e m e n t b e tw e e n C h a s e a n dth e F e d e r a l D e p o s it I n s u r a n c e C o rp o r a tio n , C h a s e d idn o t a s s u m e a n yliab ilitya s s o c ia te dw ith b o rr o w e rc la im s a g a in s t W a s h in g to n M u tu a l B a n k . See 1 2 U . S. C. § 1821( d) ( 2) ( G ) ( i ) ( I I ) ( author i z i ng F D I C t o tr a ns f e r“ a nya s s e torl i abi l i ty ” of the f a ile d b a n k ) ; se e al

so W . P ark A ss ocs. v. B ut ter

f i ed Sa v. & L oa n A ss ’n , 60 F . 3d 14 52 , 14 58 (9th C i r. 19 95 ) ( re cogn i zi ng F D IC ’ s autho ri ty t o l i m i tl i abi l i t i es as sum ed by a purchasi ng bank throu gh a P urchas e and A ss um pt i on A gree m ent ).11- 56251 3 T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n t a ki ng j udi c i a l not i c e of the c o n te n ts o f

th e P u r c h a s e a n d A s s u m p tio n A g r e e m e n t. See F e d. R . E vi d. 201( b) ( 2) ( a llo w in g ac o u rt to ta k e ju d ic ia l n o tic e o f af a c t “n o t s u b

je c t to r e a s o n ab le d is p u te b ecau se i t. . . can b e accu rat el y an dread i l y d et erm i n ed fro m so u rces w h o se a c c u r a c yc a n n o t r e a s o n ab lyb e q u e s tio n e d ” ) ; M a de j a v . O l y m p i c Pa c ke rs , LLC , 3 1 0 F .3 d 6 2 8 , 6 3 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) ( s e ttin g f o rth s ta n d a r do f

r e v ie w ) ; see a l

so Swa r t zv . KPM G LLP , 476 F . 3d 756, 763 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( pe rc ur i a m ) ( i n rul i ng on am o tio n to d is m is s , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt m a yc o n s id e r“m a tte r s p r o p e r lys u b je c t to j ud i ci al no t i ce . ”) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng the m ot i on f or r e c o n s id e r a tio n b e c au s e th e C a rm ic h a e ls f a ile dto e s tab lis h g r o u n d s f o rs u c h r e lie f

. Sch. D ist. N

o. 1J, Mul tno m ah Cnt

y. , O r. v. A Can dS

, Inc. , 5 F . 3d 1255, 1262- 63 ( 9th C i r . 1993) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t a nda r d of

r e vi e w a nd gr ounds f

orr e c ons i de r a t i on un der F ed. R . C i v. P . 60 (b)) . W e do n otconsi der m att er s notspec i fi ca l l y and di st i nct l y r ai se d and ar gu ed in th e o p e n in g b r ie f

. Se e P adge t t

v . W r i ght , 587 F . 3d 983, 985 n. 2 ( 9th C i r . 2009) (percuri am ). C ha s e ’ s m ot i on f

orj udi c i a l not i c e , f

i l e d on D e c e m be r21, 2011, i s de ni e d. AF F I RME D.