alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of Media and Entertainment.com, Inc. (the "Company") for the
period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Winston Johnson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Committee Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

     (2)  The Information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



                               By: /s/ Winston Johnson
                                   -------------------------
                                   Winston Johnson
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   and Chief Financial
                                   Officer Committee Chairman
No. 39199.

#### Petitions 5538-R, etc., of Dayton Co. (Minneapolis).

*373Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that after entry the importer discovered "that in some manner an error had been made in the entered price of 5 cents per pair, that he drew the appraiser’s attention to the error at once but that it was too late to amend the entry. Being convinced that the importer was without .any intention to defraud the revenue, to conceal or misrepresent the facts, or to ■deceive the appraiser, the court granted the petition.
#### KAGHANN’S KORNER, INC., Appellant, v. BROWN & SONS FUEL COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

No. 17A03-9802-CV-79.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

April 26, 1999.

John R. Burns III, Robert D. Moreland, Laura C. O’Donnell, Baker & Daniels, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellant.

*1287Cathleen M. Shrader, Thomas A. Herr, Barrett & McNagny, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION ON REHEARING

RILEY, Judge

Defendant-Appellant Kaghann’s Korner, Inc. (Kaghann’s Korner) has petitioned for rehearing of our decision in *Kaghann’s Korner v. Brown & Sons Fuel Co.,*706 N.E.2d 556 (Ind.Ct.App.1999). We grant Kaghann’s Korner’s petition for clarification on one issue, and in all other respects we affirm our earlier decision.

Kaghann’s Korner requests that we clarify our earlier decision by remanding the case to the trial court with instructions to determine the reasonable attorney’s fees owed to Ka-ghann’s Korner under the Underground Storage Tank Act (“USTA”). In our decision, we reversed the Dekalb Circuit Court, finding that Brown & Sons Fuel Company (Brown) was an operator of the underground storage tank (“UST”) located at Kaghann’s Korner at the time of the fuel overfill. Therefore, we found that Brown was liable for the fuel release at the UST at Kaghann’s Korner.

Kaghann’s Korner requests that we now clarify our decision in order to instruct the trial court to determine reasonable attorney’s fees owed to it by Brown pursuant to the USTA. Pursuant to the USTA, “A person who brings a successful action to receive a contribution from an owner or operator is also entitled to receive reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs from the owner or operator.” Ind.Code § 13-23-13-8(b)(2). Therefore, we grant Kaghann’s Korner petition for clarification and modify our decision by remanding this case to the Dekalb Circuit Court to determine the sole issue of reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs that Brown must pay to Kaghann’s Korner for its liability under the USTA.

STATON, J., and BROOK, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **FirstBingo.com** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended **March 31, 2005** as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Thomas M. Sheppard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 23rd day of May, 2005.

 
/s/ Thomas M. Sheppard 
Thomas M. Sheppard  
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors Amtech Systems, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-09917, 333-10117 and 333-47098) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-09911, 333-09909, 333-46086, 333-76812 and 333-103101 ) on Form S-8 of Amtech Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 10, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Amtech Systems, Inc. as of September 30, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2004, which report appears in the September 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Amtech Systems, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

December 28, 2005
II 

Calendar No. 4 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 192 

To repeal the job-killing health care law and health care-related provisions 

in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Mr. DEMINT (for himself, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts, Mr. BURR, Mr. CHAMBLISS, 

Mr. COATS, Mr. COBURN, Mr. CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. 

ENSIGN, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. HATCH, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. 

ISAKSON, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, Mr. KYL, Mr. LEE, 

Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. MORAN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. PORTMAN, 

Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. VITTER, Mr. WICKER, Mr. KIRK, Ms. SNOWE, 

and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JANUARY 27, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To repeal the job-killing health care law and health carerelated provisions in the Health Care and Education 

Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 192 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repealing the Job3 Killing Health Care Law Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE JOB-KILLING HEALTH CARE LAW 

5 AND HEALTH CARE-RELATED PROVISIONS IN 

6 THE HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION REC7 ONCILIATION ACT OF 2010. 

8 (a) JOB-KILLING HEALTH CARE LAW.—Effective as 

9 of the enactment of Public Law 111–148, such Act is re10 pealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by 

11 such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not 

12 been enacted. 

13 (b) HEALTH CARE-RELATED PROVISIONS IN THE

14 HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF

15 2010.—Effective as of the enactment of the Health Care 

16 and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 

17 111–152), title I and subtitle B of title II of such Act 

18 are repealed, and the provisions of law amended or re19 pealed by such title or subtitle, respectively, are restored 

20 or revived as if such title and subtitle had not been en21 acted. 

22 SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT. 

23 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

24 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

25 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

26 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 192 PCS

1 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

2 by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the 

3 House of Representatives, as long as such statement has 

4 been submitted prior to the vote on passage of this Act. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 4 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 192 

A BILL 

To repeal the job-killing health care law and health 

Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. care-related provisions in the Health Care and 

JANUARY 27, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to Section 906



Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President,
Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Bioanalytical Systems Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (a) | the Form 10-K/A Annual Report of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:  /s/ Anthony S. Chilton          
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | Anthony S. Chilton                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  February 14, 2012             



| | By:  /s/  Michael R. Cox                  
| | ------------------------------------------
| |                                           
| | Michael R. Cox                            
| | Vice President, Finance and Administration
| | and Chief Financial Officer               
| | Date:   February 14, 2012
No. 47064.

#### Protests 829203-G, etc., of Western Novelty Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

From the record it appeared that counsel agreed the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Okuda*(23 C. C. P. A. 46, T. D. 47713). The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 205 (e) was therefore sustained.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1826

___________ Amarjeet Singh, also known as * Rajinder Singh, * * Petition for Review of Petitioner, * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General * of the United States, * * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: October 27, 2010 Filed: October 29, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Amarjeet Singh, also known as Rajinder Si ngh, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA ) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. See Rodriguez-Cuate v. Gonzales , 444 F.3d 1015, 1018-19 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
_PJ_ 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

48) IV-E-36 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:29 AM Sheet 48 of 105 
P.2 

A-83-27 

CORPORATION IV-E-36 

TELEPHONE CALL REPORT - INDUSTRIAL BOILER S02 NSPS 

DATE: April 9, 1987 

TO: Mr. Carl Buzzuto 

C-E Lurgi 

1000 Prospect Hill Road 

Windsor, CT 06095 

(203) 688-1911 

FROM: J. Thomas Waddell 

SUBJECT: FBC unit at lone Energy, lone, CA 

Mr. Buzzuto provided the following information: 

o 1 FBC unit; 146,000 pph 

o started up in January 1987 

o circulating bed 

o burns lignite; 1.2% sulfur 

o subject to State emmissions limit of 0.261 lb S02/MMBtu 

o design Ca/S ratio is about ••1T5-\ 

/.7t> 

Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hwy./P.O. Box 13000/Research Triangle Park. N.C. 27709/(919)541-9100
~ 

Metrolina Drone Works 

nnY 11m1—nn !„ ro ✓ ['(. 

Wesley Robinson 

Metrolina Drone Works, LLC 

8226 Fairview Rd 

Charlotte, NC 28226 

Tel (704) 577-0301 

The Honorable Michael P. Huerta The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Office of the Administrator Office of the Secretary 

Federal Aviation Administration US Department of Transportation 

800 Independence Avenue SW 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20591 Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Metrolina Drone Wor•ks sUAS Petition for Exemption Pursuant to FMRA Sec 

333 and 14 CFR Part 11 

Dear Administrator Huerta: 

Metrolina Drone Works, LLC hereby petitions the FAA for regulatory relief pursuant to Section 

333 of P.L. 112-95 and 14 C.F.R. Sec. 11.81 to conduct commercial flights using the DJI Phantom 

3 Professional and DJI Phantom 3 Advanced. for the following applications: 

• Aerial Videography for Film and Television 

• Aerial Videography of Golf Courses 

• Real Estate Videography 

• Agricultural Videography and Photography 

• Closed Set and Event Aerial Videography 

• Closed Set and Event Aerial Videography 

Metrolina Drone Works, therefore, seeks a request for exemption from airworthiness and the following specific Title 14 C.F.R. provisions: 

• 14 C.F.R. Part 21 

• 14 C.F.R. 45.23 

• 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) (b) 

• 14 C.F.R. 61.133(a) 

• 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) 

DocID:97d3c5f617d104de2a9d9425c1ce08a647cb35b ~
No. 96-5666.

#### Bishop *v.*State Bar of Georgia.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 48184.

#### Protests 96582-K (A), etc., of Czarnikow Rionda Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the fiction of the collector, which was held presumptively correct. "
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T G E N O V E V A M A R T I N E Z R I O S and AG USTIN A RM ENTA M ARTINEZ, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 74027 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 196- 227

A 095- 196- 228 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G e nove vaM art i ne z R i os and A gus t i n A rm e nt aM art i ne z , na t i ve s and ci t i zen s o f M ex i co , p et i t i o n fo r rev i ew o f th e B o ardo f Im m i g rat i o n A p p eal s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng thei r m ot i on t o reopen. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo due pr oc e s s c l a i m s , and f orabus e of 

# FI LED JU N 28 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 74027 2 di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of

am ot i on t o r e ope n. I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 894 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e ope n ba s e d on i ne f

f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of

c ouns e l be c aus e pe t i t i one r s di d not dem on strat e thatthei r pri or coun se l fa i l ed t o p er form w i th suffi ci entcom pet ence . M a ra v illa M

a ra v illa v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 8 1 F . 3 d8 5 5 , 8 5 8 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ). P et i t i o n ers’ c o n te n tio n th a t th e B I A f a ile dto m a k e af

in d in g r e g ar d in g c o u n s e ls ’ c o m p e te n c e is uns upport e d bythe r e c or d. I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e ne e d notr e a c h pe t i t i one r s ’ r e m a i ni ng co n t en t i o n s. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 11, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50081 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAIME MENOTTI-OCHOA, also known as Peralbo Flores-Villa, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1569-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jaime MenottiOchoa raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 45358.

#### Protests 46637-K, etc., of Borden Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Kraft*v. *United States*(T. D. 47955) the protests were sustained as to the allowance for paper and foil in the dutiable weight of the cheese in question. *United States*v. *Suzarte*(8 C. C. P. A. 99, T. D. 37219) cited.
No. 47702.

#### Protest 65790-K of John Wanamaker, Philadelphia (Philadelphia).

*443Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel the merchandise consisting of hemmed or hemstitched handkerchiefs or woven mufflers, block-printed by hand, in chief value of silk, valued at more than $5 per dozen, was held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1209, as amended by the United Kingdom Trade Agreement, T. D. 49753. Abstract 46985 followed. It was further stipulated that the hemmed or hemstitched mufflers or handkerchiefs, not block-printed by hand, in chief value of silk, and valued at more than $5 per dozen, are similar to those involved in Abstract 46832, and the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 1209 and T. D. 49753 was therefore sustained.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PATRICK HOUSER
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 1551

[ April 8, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Matthew I. Destry , Judge; L.T. Case No.

13002950CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Amy Lora Rabinowitz, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Catherine Linton, Assistant Attorney Gen eral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State , 648 So. 2d 263, 263 (Fla. 5 th DCA 1994) (“ Where the mistake or misunderstanding in entering a plea is attributable to the defendant, it is not error for the court to refus e to allow

withdrawal of it. ” ) (citation omitted).

G ERBER
, L EVINE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Before the Second Division,

January 30, 1941

No. 45319.

#### Protests 563959-G, etc., of J. C. Penney Co. et al. (St. Louis, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 74-5847.

#### Daniels *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 44382.

#### Protests 730150-G, etc., of Feltex Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 100 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 29148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER07-799-000 and EL07-61-000]


Norwalk Power LLC; Notice of Filing

May 17, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 26, 2007, Norwalk Power LLC filed an 
unexecuted cost-of-service agreement, designated as Original Volume No. 
3, between NRG Power Marketing Inc., ISO New England Inc. and itself, 
pursuant to sections 205, 206, and Part 35 of the Commission's 
regulations.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d69093849599b8babfb8b385a3a6a6b9a4a296b0b3a4b5f8b1b9a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="55131007161a3b393c3b30062025253a272115333027367b323a23">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9993 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>