Name:

Title:

Company:

Sign Date:

Name:

Title:

Company:

Sign Date:

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 1 of 10
Facility Information:

Harrison Power Station

State Route 20

Haywood W 26366

Contact: Mark Sowa

Phone: 724-838-6133

Fax: 724-830-7711

Email: msowa@alleghenyenergy.com

Testing Company:

TEST, Inc.

Route 2 Box 33B

Poca W 25159

Contact: Paul Chinuntdet

Phone: 304 755 1077

Fax: 304 755 1099

Email: pchin@testincorp.com

Air Permit Number:

R30-03300015-2009

Permitted Source ID/Name:

3944 Harrison Power Station UNIT 2

Permitted Maximum Process Rate: Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:

693 MW NSOC

Target Process Test Rate

> 623.7 MW (net)

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: 110000586125 FRS #:

SCC / Description 10100202 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal) 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack S2 360 0 0 0 0 0 4 24

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack S1 Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 180 0

Stack S1 Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 180 0

Hydrogen Chloride Method 26 3 180 0 Please change to 

Method 26A

Stack S1

Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26 3 180 0 Please change to 

Method 26A

Stack S1

Regulation Description Compound Limit Unit

Utilty MACT ICR 0

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 2 of 10
The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

Stack S1 Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 60 0

Stack S1 Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 60 0

Stack S2 Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 180 0

Stack S2 Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 180 0

Stack S2 Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 60 0

Stack S2 Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 60 0

Stack S3 Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 180 0

Stack S3 Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 180 0

Stack S3 Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 60 0

Stack S3 Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 60 0

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 3 of 10
Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack S2 - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 4/21/2010 4/21/2010 4/21/2010

Run Start Time 7:15:00 AM 11:00:00 

AM

2:50:00 PM

Run Finish Time 10:30:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 6:02:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 90.335 91.193 91.506 91.011

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 12.53 11.91 10.54 11.660

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.88 12.49 12.52 12.630

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.05 11.97 12.16 12.060

Oxygen, % 8.02 7.41 7.1 7.510

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.08 121.00 121.00 121.360

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 2,437,440.4 2,483,747.9 2,531,694.2 2,484,294.16

7

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 3,247,871.1 3,276,710.9 3,295,796.1 3,273,459.36

7

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 109.6 108.6 106.9 108.367

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Location Stack S2 - Method 6C

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 4 of 10
Location Stack S2 - Method 7E

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 5 of 10
Emissions Summary

Process Run Data

Location: Stack S2 - Method 26A

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 2.53 1.73 1 1.753

Elb/hr 9.03E+00 6.23E+00 3.66E+00 6.307

lb/mmBtuO2 9.80E-04 6.34E-04 3.57E-04 0.001

mg/dscm 9.89E-01 6.70E-01 3.86E-01 0.682

ppm 6.53E-01 4.42E-01 2.55E-01 0.450

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride

Average

RunNumber 1 2 3

Mass_mg 0.39 0.31 0.35 0.350

Elb/hr 1.39E+00 1.12E+00 1.28E+00 1.263

lb/mmBtuO2 1.51E-04 1.14E-04 1.25E-04 0.000

mg/dscm 1.52E-01 1.20E-01 1.35E-01 0.136

ppm 1.83E-01 1.44E-01 1.62E-01 0.163

Location: Stack S2 - Method 6C

Compound: Sulfur Dioxide

Average

Run 1 2 3

Elb/hr 7.33E+02 6.54E+02 6.35E+02 674.000

lb/mmBtuO2 8.78E-02 5.24E-02 7.01E-02 0.070

ppm 3.34E+01 2.98E+01 2.90E+01 30.733

Location: Stack S2 - Method 7E

Compound: Nitrogen oxides (NOx)

Average

Run 1 2 3

Elb/hr 7.45E+02 6.80E+01 7.59E+02 524.000

lb/mmBtuO2 8.22E-02 8.35E-02 8.37E-02 0.083

ppm 4.73E+01 4.81E+01 4.82E+01 47.867

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 6 of 10
Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Heat input 0 lb/mmbtu 0

1 Bituminous Coal Burned 0 1000 Tons/hr 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 WET SCRUBBER 0 0

Run Name Value UOM Comments

1 Cl 0.79 %

2 Cl 0 %

1 Fl 0 ppm

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 7 of 10
Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack S2 - Method 26A

Average

Run Number 1 2 3

Test Date 4/21/2010 4/21/2010 4/21/2010

Run Start Time 7:15:00 AM 11:00:00 AM 2:50:00 PM

Run Finish Time 10:30:00 AM 2:10:00 PM 6:02:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 37 37 37

Net Run Time, minutes 180 180 180

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.156 0.156 0.156 0.156

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.025 1.025 1.025 1.025

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.31 28.34 28.28 28.310

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 0.72 0.73 0.75 0.733

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 98.032 98.920 99.827 98.926

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 96.75 97.11 99.14 97.667

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 90.335 91.193 91.506 91.011

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 275 262 229 255.333

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 12.94 12.33 10.78 12.017

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 12.53 11.91 10.54 11.660

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.88 12.49 12.52 12.630

Dry Mole Fraction 0.8747 0.8809 0.8946 0.883

Carbon Dioxide, % 12.05 11.97 12.16 12.060

Oxygen, % 8.02 7.41 7.1 7.510

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 79.93 80.62 80.74 80.430

Fuel Factor 1.07 1.13 1.13

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.25 30.21 30.23 30.230

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.72 28.76 28.94 28.807

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.200

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 28.30 28.33 28.27 28.300

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.08 121.00 121.00 121.360

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 1.5878482342

1069

1.623113035

20418

1.649091672

69665

1.620

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 76.58 77.26 77.71 77.183

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 706.858 706.858 706.858 706.858

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 2,437,440.4 2,483,747.9 2,531,694.2 2,484,294.1

67

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 3,247,871.1 3,276,710.9 3,295,796.1 3,273,459.3

67

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 109.6 108.6 106.9 108.367

Percent Excess Air, % 61.3 53.4 49.9 54.867

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 360 360 360

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 8 of 10
Location Stack S2 - Method 6C

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 9 of 10
Location Stack S2 - Method 7E

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Saturday, January 15, 2011 Page 10 of 10