T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HU GO SOSA RI VA S Y PE RE Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73070 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 003- 287 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H ugo S os aR i va s yP e r e z , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r o m an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) d e c is io n d e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e c o n s id e r . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the 

# FI LED JU N 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73070 2 d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e c o n s id e r , Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 4 0 0 F .3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 5 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e a g en cyd idn o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n b y d en yin g S o saR iv as y P er ez ’s m o ti o n to re co n sid erw h er e h e f ailedto es tab li sh an y e rr o r o f f ac t o r law inth e I J’s p r e v io u s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . See 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 23 (b)( 2); Sem bi ri ngv. G on zales , 49 9 F . 3d 98 1, 98 8 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( i n a m ot i on t o reopen b a s e do n la c ko f

n o tic e , ap e titio n e rm u s t “p r o du c e [ ] s u f f ic ie n t e v id e n c e to o v e r c o m e th e p r e s u m p tio n o f e f f e c tiv e s e rv ic e b yr e g u larm a il” ) . T o th e e x te n t S o s aR iv a s yP e r e z ’s m o tio n to r e c o n s id e rw a s b a s e do n n e w ly s ubm i tt e d e vi de nc e , the a ge nc ydi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byc ons trui ng the m ot i on a s as e c ond m ot i on t o r e ope n and byde ny i ng i ta s num e r i c a l l ybarr e d. See Moh am m ed , 400 F . 3d a t793 ( B I A m ayc ons true m ot i ons ba s e d on the i runde r l y i ng p u rp o s e ) ; V

ega v. H older , 61 1 F . 3d 11 68 , 11 71 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( pu rpose of a m o tio n to r e c o n s id e ris n o t to s ub m it n e w e v id e n c e ) ; 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 3 ( b ) ( 4 ) ( ii) (onl y one m ot i on t o reopen i n absent i a r em ov alproceedi ng s i s perm i tt ed). S o s aR iv a s yP e r e z ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e B I A e rr e db yf a ilin g to r e m an dto th e I Jf a ils b e c au s e h e d idn o t r e q u e s t ar e m an din c o n n e c tio n w ith h is B I A ap p e a l. S os aR i va s yP e r e z ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons ar e una va i l i ng. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.