### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 3 0 4 7 8 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

W I L L I A M E D W A R D S T E W A R T ,
P e t i t i o n e r
- A p p e l l a n t

v
.
J O E K E F F E R ,
R e s p o n d e n t

- A p p e l l e e

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o
. 1 : 0 8

- C V

- 9 0 9

B e f o r e H I G G I N B O T H A M , S M I T H , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
I n 1 9 9 9 , W i l l i a m E d w a r d S t e w a r t , f e d e r a l p r i s o n e r # 8 3 5 0 8

- 0 7 9 , p l e a d e d

g u i l t y t o m o n e y l a u n d e r i n g , i n v i o l a t i o n o f 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 9 5 6

. I n 2 0 0 8 , S t e w a r t 1
f i l e d a p e t i t i o n u n d e r 2 8 U

. S

. C

. § 2 2 4 1 a r g u i n g t h a t h i s m o n e y l a u n d e r i n g

c o n v i c t i o n s h o u l d b e i n v a l i d a t e d i n l i g h t o f t h e S u p r e m e C o u r t ’ s t h e n
- r e c e n t d e c i s i o n i n U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. S a n t o s , 5 5 3 U

. S

. 5 0 7 ( 2 0 0 8 )

. P r i o r t o s e r v i c e o n t h e U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 17 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pur sua nt to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has det erm ined that this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4.
Acco rd ingly, the rec ent ame ndm ent to this st atut e def ining “p roc eed s” to i nclud e 1 “gro ss r ece ipt s of suc h ac tivit y” is not in cont enti on. 18 U .S .C. 195 6(c )( 9)( 2009)

. Case: 09-30478 Document: 00511385642 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2011N o
. 0 9

- 3 0 4 7 8

d e f e n d a n t , t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d i s m i s s e d t h e § 2 2 4 1 p e t i t i o n c o n c l u d i n g t h a t S t e w a r t d i d n o t m e e t t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r p r o c e e d i n g u n d e r t h e s a v i n g s c l a u s e

o f 2 8 U

. S

. C

. § 2 2 5 5 a s s e t f o r t h i n R e y e s
- R e q u e n a v
. U n i t e d S t a t e s , 2 4 3 F

. 3 d 8 9 3 , 9 0 4 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 1 )

. I n r e v i e w i n g t h e d e n i a l o f h a b e a s r e l i e f , t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s f i n d i n g s o f f a c t s a r e r e v i e w e d f o r c l e a r e r r o r a n d i s s u e s o f l a w a r e r e v i e w e d d e

n o v o
. J e f

f e r s v
. C h a n d l e r , 2 5 3 F

. 3 d 8 2 7 , 8 3 0 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 1 )

. I n t h i s c a s e , t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t l i m i t e d t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f S a n t o s t o c a s e s o f i l l e g a l g a m b l i n g
. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d i d n o t h a v e t h e b e n e f i t o f t h i s c o u r t ’ s

c o n t r a r y r e a s o n i n g i n G a r l a n d v
. R o y , 6 1 5 F

. 3 d 3 9 1 , 4 0 2

- 0 4 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 1 0 ) ,

w h e n i t r e a c h e d t h i s c o n c l u s i o n
. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e j u d g m e n t o f d i s m i s s a l o f S t e w a r t ’ s § 2 2 4 1 p e t i t i o n i s V A C A T E D , a n d t h e m a t t e r i s R E M A N D E D t o d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r , c o n s i s t e n t w i t h G a r l a n d , h i s c l a i m f a l l s w i t h i n t h e s a v i n g s

c l a u s e o f § 2 2 5 5

. S t e w a r t ’ s m o t i o n f

o r r e l e a s e p e n d i n g a p p e a l i s D E N I E D

. S e e C a l l e y v
. C a l l a w a y , 4 9 6 F

. 2 d 7 0 1 , 7 0 2 ( 5 t h C i r
. 1 9 7 4 )

.

2 Case: 09-30478 Document: 00511385642 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2011