alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015118EN.01000401.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — bpost SA v Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT)

(Case C-340/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Postal services - Directive 97/67/EC - Article 12 - Universal service provider - Quantitative discounts - Application to intermediaries who consolidate postal items - Requirement of non-discrimination))

(2015/C 118/05)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: bpost SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications (IBPT)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of non-discrimination in postal tariffs laid down in Article 12 of Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service, as amended by Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008, must be interpreted as not precluding a system of quantitative discounts per sender, such as that at issue in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 10.8.2013.

1

---
#### Peyton, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6583.

Entry No. 732434, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, November 4, 1941, etc.

Certified November 4, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 12, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 6, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P: Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

Undisputed facts in the record before me establish export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.
No. 54908.

#### Mikhael, Shiri & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 134546-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record disclosing nothing that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
No. 96-7904.

#### Taylor *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Summit
Environmental Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Chris Dellinges, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.Section78m
orSection78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April 15, 2003
                                                     /s/ Chris Dellinges
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Chris Dellinges
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

         The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
October 7, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Teleconference with American Electric Power (AEP)

Attendees :

Gina McCartthy, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Joseph Goffman, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Lorie Schmidt, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Peter Tsirigotis, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD Kevin Culligan, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD John McManus, AEP Dennis Welsh, AEP Mark McCollough, AEP

Discussion :

A general discussion was held of the comment s submitted by AEP on the proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS). AE P indicated that MATS would cau se them to have to close many plants ahead of schedule; many of those pl ants are “RMR” plants which will cause big reliability problems; and an unspecified number of them are black start facilities. AEP indicated a need for much more time - until 2020. And if they had more time, there would be no serious environmental consequence because they ha ve already gotten 80 percent reduction in NO X and

SO 2

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Institute of Standards and Technology 

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2, notice is hereby given that there will be a meeting of the Board of Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award on June 4, 2008. The Board of Overseers is composed of eleven members prominent in the fields of quality, innovation, and performance excellence and appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, assembled to advise the Secretary of Commerce on the conduct of the Baldrige Award. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss and review information received from the National Institute of Standards and Technology with the members of the Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The agenda will include: Baldrige Program budget update; Revisions to the award eligibility rules; Baldrige Collaborative activities; and the Baldrige Body of Knowledge and Baldrige Fellows Initiatives. 

# DATES:

The meeting will convene June 4, 2008, at 8:30 a.m. and adjourn at3 p.m. on June 4, 2008. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Administration Building, Lecture Room A, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. All visitors to the National Institute of Standards and Technology site will have to pre-register to be admitted. Please submit your name, time of arrival, e-mail address and phone number to Diane Harrison no later than Tuesday, June 3, 2008, and she will provide you with instructions for admittance. Ms. Harrison's e-mail address is                         *diane.harrison@nist.gov*                         and her phone number is (301) 975-2361.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Harry Hertz, Director, National Quality Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, telephone number (301) 975-2361. 

Dated: May 1, 2008. 

James M. Turner, 

Deputy Director.

 [FR Doc. E8-10092 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-13-P
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2010 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2010

 To amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government 
          pension offset and windfall elimination provisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2011

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government 
          pension offset and windfall elimination provisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Fairness Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF GOVERNMENT PENSION OFFSET PROVISION.

    (a) In General.--Section 202(k) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 402(k)) is amended by striking paragraph (5).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 202(b)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
        402(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``subsections (k)(5) and 
        (q)'' and inserting ``subsection (q)''.
            (2) Section 202(c)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(c)(2)) is 
        amended by striking ``subsections (k)(5) and (q)'' and 
        inserting ``subsection (q)''.
            (3) Section 202(e)(2)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        402(e)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ``subsection (k)(5), 
        subsection (q),'' and inserting ``subsection (q)''.
            (4) Section 202(f)(2)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        402(f)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ``subsection (k)(5), 
        subsection (q)'' and inserting ``subsection (q)''.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF WINDFALL ELIMINATION PROVISIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 215 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
415) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (7);
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking paragraph (3); and
            (3) in subsection (f), by striking paragraph (9).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Subsections (e)(2) and (f)(2) of 
section 202 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402) are each amended by striking 
``section 215(f)(5), 215(f)(6), or 215(f)(9)(B)'' in subparagraphs (C) 
and (D)(i) and inserting ``paragraph (5) or (6) of section 215(f)''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to monthly 
insurance benefits payable under title II of the Social Security Act 
for months after December 2011. Notwithstanding section 215(f) of the 
Social Security Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall adjust 
primary insurance amounts to the extent necessary to take into account 
the amendments made by section 3.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 100 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29138-29139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9973]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OA07-24-000]


Alcoa Power Generating Inc. Long Sault Division; Notice of Filing

May 18, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 14, 2007, the Long Sault Division of Alcoa 
Power Generating Inc. filed a request for partial waiver of Order No. 
890, III FERC Statutes and Regulations ] 31,131.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.

[[Page 29139]]

There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables 
subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to 
a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, 
please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8fefdeafbf7d6d4d1d6ddebcdc8c8d7caccf8deddcadb96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll 
free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 13, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9973 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Thanks for looking at this document. I hope you’re having a great day in training!
# C_2014159EN.01002301.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2014 — Golam v OHIM — Derby Cycle Werke (FOCUS extreme)

(Case T-568/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark FOCUS extreme - Earlier national word mark FOCUS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 159/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sofia Golam (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Trovas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Derby Cycle Werke GmbH (Cloppenburg, Germany) (represented by: U. Gedert, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 October 2012 (Case R 2327/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Derby Cycle Werke GmbH and Sofia Golam.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sofia Golam to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sofia Golam to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.

1

---
# C_2012355EN.01002901.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/29

---

Action brought on 24 August 2012 — Kampol v OHIM — Colmol (Nobel)

(Case T-382/12)

2012/C 355/62

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kampol sp. z o.o. (Świdnica, Poland) (represented by: J. Kępiński, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Colmol-Colchões, SA (Oliveira de Azeméis, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Accept the appeal and annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 June 2012 in case R 2286/2011-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Accept the appeal and annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 June 2012 in case R 2286/2011-4;

| — | Reject in its entirety the opposition No B 1762742 (Community trade mark application No 9080078); |
| --- | --- |

—

Reject in its entirety the opposition No B 1762742 (Community trade mark application No 9080078);

| — | Order OHIM to register the trade mark applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to register the trade mark applied for;

| — | Order OHIM to bear the costs of the proceedings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to bear the costs of the proceedings; and

| — | Alternatively, refer back the case to the Fourth Board of Appeal to hear the case once again, in accordance with the binding criteria established by the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

—

Alternatively, refer back the case to the Fourth Board of Appeal to hear the case once again, in accordance with the binding criteria established by the Court of Justice.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Nobel’ in colours black, gold and red, for goods in classes 10 and 24 — Community trade mark application No 9080078

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Portuguese trade mark registration No 373184 of the word mark ‘NOBEL’, for goods in class 20

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
#### United States *v.*The Stewart Dry Goods Co.

No. 7746.

Entry No. 63.

(Decided October 14, 1949)

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States as follows:

> Argentine “undesignated” pesos 22, plus packing, each.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was Argentine “undesignated” pesos 22, plus packing, each.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19848]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Genetic Epidemiology of Lung Cancer I and II.
    Date: August 4, 1997.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Place: Teleconference, National Cancer Institute, Executive 
Plaza North, Room 635G, 6130, Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Contact Person: Sally A. Mulhern, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 635G, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7410, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7410, Telephone: 301/496-7413.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control)

    Dated: July 22, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-19848 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2016270EN.01006701.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/67

---

Order of the General Court of 6 June 2016 — Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA

(Case T-560/12) (1)

1

(2016/C 270/72)

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.

1

---