alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.9
 Agreement No. 0«PRSU_Agr»
 SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PERFORMANCE-BASED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 THIS PERFORMANCE-BASED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT Agreement Company «A_HeaderName_First» «Name_Mi» «A_HeaderName_Last» Grantee , 20___ Grant Date Plan
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1. Grant of Target Units. «Rounded_Prsu» «Rounded_PRSU» Target Units Section 3 Share
 2. Transfer Restrictions Transfer
 3. Performance Criteria and Stock Awards Committee
 4. Vesting and Payment of Target Units
 Vesting Date Section
5
 Vesting Date
    
    Percentage of Target Units Vested, 20__
    
    
    33 1/3
    %, 20__
    
    
    33 1/3
    %, 20__
    
    
    33 1/3
    %TOTAL
    
    
    100
    %
 75




---



##### 



Settlement of Target Units Section 1 2 Section 4(a) Sections 3 and 4 Section 5
 Dividends, Splits and Voting Rights . Section 4(b)
 5. Forfeiture
 Termination Due to Death or Disability Section 3 Section 4(b)
 Section 5(a) Code
 Termination Other than Death or Disability
 6. Grantees Representations.
 7. Tax Withholding. Withholding Liability
 76




---



##### 



8. Par Value Paid Consideration for Shares
 9. Miscellaneous.
 No Fractional Shares
 No Effect on Employment or Service Section 4
 Dispute Resolution Rules AAA
 Tax Consultation
 Nature of the Grant
       77




---



##### 



Data Privacy Notice and Consent
   Language
 Delivery of Documents and Notices [name@smith.com]
 78




---



##### 



Description of Electronic Delivery
 Consent to Electronic Delivery Section 9(h) [name@smith.com] [name@smith.com]
 Amendment, Termination and Waiver
 Governing Law and Severability
 Successors and Assigns
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:Name:Title:GRANTEE:
    
    «A_HeaderName_First»«Name_Mi»«A_HeaderName_Last»SignaturePrint Name
 79
Exhibit 31.2

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

Principal Executive Officer

I, Thomas Sheppard, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report of Firstbingo.com Inc.;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) 	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) 	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: May 23, 2005 | /s/ Thomas Sheppard        
|------------------ | ---------------------------
|                   | Thomas Sheppard            
|                   | Principal Executive Officer





---
# C_2013046EN.01001202.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 9 November 2012 — Walter Vapenik v Josef Thurner

(Case C-508/12)

2013/C 46/22

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesgericht Salzburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Walter Vapenik

Applicant:

Defendant: Josef Thurner

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 6(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 (1) to be interpreted as applying only to contracts between business persons as creditors and consumers as debtors, or is it sufficient for at least the debtor to be the consumer for the provision also to apply to claims of a consumer against another consumer?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims (OJ 2004 L 143, p. 15)

1

---
Opinion issued January 30, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00552-CV

———————————

PEDRO ESCOBAR, Appellant

V.

JULIO DE LOS REYES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-31739

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal due to a 

settlement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(2)(A). No opinion has issued. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). 
2

Accordingly, we grant the joint motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). We also dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Landau and Rivas-Molloy.
# C_2013026EN.01004901.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/49

---

Order of the General Court of 20 November 2012 — Geipel v OHIM — Reeh (BEST BODY NUTRITION)

(Case T-138/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 26/98

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Yves Geipel (Auerbach, Germany) (represented by: J. Sachs, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and R. Pethke, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Jörg Reeh (Buxtehude, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2012 (Case R 2433/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Jörg Reeh and Yves Geipel.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 157, 2.6.2012.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# It's business as usual for Fort Meade's property disposal experts 

By Public AffairsDLA Disposition Services Public Affairs

                BATTLE CREEK, Mich.  –              
Members of the Fort Meade property disposal team in Maryland continue to support their region's warfighters despite the many challenges presented by the ongoing pandemic. Get to know some of the DLA Disposition Services at Meade personnel and see the wide variety of work they do daily to ensure a continuous flow of used and excess military equipment along the DOD's reverse logistics chain in the embedded video link. 02:50VIDEO  | 02:50 |Logistics On Location: DLA Disposition Services, Ft Meade, MD (long version)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA DSNorth East DSWarfighter First DSStrategic Positioning DSSupply Chain DSVideo DS
Reap. Dec. 9689.

reappraisements R59/12404 and R59/13186.

#### Standard Sewing Equipment Corp. *v.*United States,

Reap. Dec. 9650. Motion by plaintiff.
No. 45291.

#### Protests 824240-G, etc., of Latorraca Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 15 (Thursday, January 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 3913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01316]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8606]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Passions of Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Passions of Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about March 10, 2014, until on 
or about May 26, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 16, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-01316 Filed 1-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# C_2014421EN.01001101.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Commerz Nederland NV v Havenbedrijf Rotterdam NV

(Case C-242/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Competition - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Definition of aid - Guarantees provided by a public undertaking to a bank to facilitate lending to third party creditors - Guarantees deliberately provided by the director of that public undertaking in disregard of that undertaking’s statutes - Presumption of opposition by the public body that owns that undertaking - Whether the guarantees may be imputed to the State))

2014/C 421/14

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Commerz Nederland NV

Appellant:

Respondent: Havenbedrijf Rotterdam NV

Respondent:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

On a proper construction of Article 107(1) TFEU, for the purposes of determining whether or not the guarantees provided by a public undertaking are imputable to the public authority controlling that undertaking, the following are relevant, together with the body of evidence arising from the circumstances of the case in the main proceedings and from the context in which they took place: on the one hand, that the sole director of the company providing those guarantees acted improperly, deliberately kept the provision of those guarantees secret and disregarded the undertaking’s statutes and, on the other, that that public authority would have opposed the provision of the guarantees, had it been informed of it. In a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, those circumstances could, in themselves, exclude such imputability only if it may be inferred that the guarantees at issue were provided without the involvement of that same public authority.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                         ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC
           EXHIBIT 12.1 - STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIOS -
                           FIXED CHARGE COVERAGE RATIO
                      FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
                 AND 1996, AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 28,
                          1995 THOUGH DECEMBER 31, 1995

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           PERIOD FROM
                                                          SEPTEMBER 28,
                                                         TO DECEMBER 31,     YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,    
                                                              1995            1996             1997     
                                                         ---------------      ----             ----     
<S>                                                      <C>                <C>            <C>          
Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations.....      $  870,000       $ 6,409,000    $   712,000  
Minority interest in the income of subsidiary with                                                      
  fixed charges......................................           9,000            69,000         97,000  
                                                           ----------       -----------    -----------  
                                                              879,000         6,478,000        809,000  
                                                           ----------       -----------    -----------  
Fixed charges:                                                                                          
  Interest expense and amortization of debt discount                                                    
     and premium on all indebtedness.................         975,000         4,312,000     12,627,000  
Rentals(1)...........................................          11,000           223,000        751,000  
                                                           ----------       -----------    -----------  
Total fixed charges..................................         986,000         4,535,000     13,378,000  
                                                           ----------       -----------    -----------  
Earnings before income taxes, minority interest and                                                     
  fixed charges......................................      $1,865,000       $11,013,000    $14,187,000  
                                                           ==========       ===========    ===========  
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges...................            1.89x             2.43x          1.06x 
                                                           ==========       ===========    ===========  

</TABLE>
 
-------------------------
(1) Amount included in fixed charges for rentals is considered by management to
    be a reasonable approximation of the interest factor.
No. 45312.

#### Protests 40343-K (B), etc., of Pietro Deiro et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Converted by EDGARwiz





Incorporated Under the Laws of The State of Delaware






















NUMBER _______________

SHARES ___________




IMAGINE MEDIA, LTD.

The Corporation is authorized to issue 100,000,000 Common Shares -- Par Value $.00001 each and 25,000,000 Preferred Shares – Par Value $.00001 each.







This Certifies That _                    (NAME)______________________ is the owner of _____________(letter amount)__

fully paid and non-assessable Shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.




In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation.




























___________________________________

___________________________________

Secretary

President
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

                           Certification of CEO and CFO

**                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**                              As Adopted Pursuant to**

**                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Angeles Partners XII (the "Partnership"), for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
# @ 0 Al 11 10 

### STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS 

### RODERICK WELLS NO. 

### 2024 KW 0166


### MARCH 22, 

### 2024

In Re: Roderick Wells, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 11- 12- 0703. BEFORE: 

### MCCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

## WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include 

# thedistrictcourt'srulingonhismotiontoamendand/ormodify sentence, the Boykin 

### transcript, pertinent 

### district court minutes, and 

### any other portions of the 

### district court record that might support the claims raised in the writ application. 

### Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for 

### rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of 

### Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 

### 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event 

## relator elects to file a new applicationwith this court, he may do so without the 

### necessity of 

### obtaining a return 

### date. 

## Any future 

## filing on this 

### issue should 

### include the entire contents of this application, 

## the missing items noted above, and a 

### copy 

## ofthis ruling. PMC CHH SMM



### RT OF APPEAL, 

### FIRST CIRCUIT


### UTY CLERKOF COURT FOR THE COURT
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
PURSUANT TO 
TITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of MDS Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Rogers, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. s.1350, as adopted pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  March 17, 2005 | __/s/ John A. Rogers_(John A. Rogers)President & Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 39231.

#### Protest 938106-G of Jordan Marsh Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was found that the merchandise was imported after-the effective date of the trade agreement in question. The claim at 65 percent under paragraph 1529 was therefore sustained.