alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Erich S. Herrmann, Inc. (Globe Shipping Co., Inc.) et al. *v.*United States

No. 6927.

Entry No. 771133, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, May 1, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 24, 1946, etc.

(Decided February 26, 1947)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kjncheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3

- 0263 LT Case No. 2018

- 011777CF

_____________________________
E RNEST D OMETRICE M ITCHELL , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Adrian G. Soud, Judge

. Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender
, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General
, Tallaha ssee , for Appellee.

O ctober 24, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
J AY , B OATWRIGHT , and P RATT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
Imatron Inc.:



We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (File
Nos. 333-11515,  333-6749, 333-3529, 333-647, 33-63123 and 333-51963 on Form S-3
and File Nos. 333-15081,  333-9989,  222-61179,  33-71786,  33-66992,  33-66952,
33-40391, 33-28662 and 33-26833 on Form S-8) of Imatron Inc. of our report dated
February 12, 1998,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Imatron Inc.
and  subsidiary as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,  and the related  consolidated
statements of  operations,  shareholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the years
then ended, and the related  schedule,  which report appears in the December 31,
1998, annual report on Form 10-K of Imatron Inc.




KPMG LLP


San Francisco, California
March 31, 1999
No. 48805.

#### Protests 71365-K, etc., of T. D. Downing Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 18 

To repeal the expansion of information reporting requirements for payments 

of $600 or more to corporations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. JOHANNS (for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. ALEXANDER, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. 

BARRASSO, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. BENNET, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. 

BROWN of Massachusetts, Mr. BURR, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COATS, Mr. 

COBURN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. ENZI, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mrs. HAGAN, Mr. 

HOEVEN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ISAKSON, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. KYL, Mr. LEE, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. MORAN, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. 

PORTMAN, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Ms. SNOWE, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. 

TESTER, Mr. THUNE, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. WICKER, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. VITTER, Mr. KIRK, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. WARNER, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. HATCH, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. TOOMEY, and 

Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the expansion of information reporting requirements for payments of $600 or more to corporations, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 18 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Paper3 work Mandate Elimination Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXPANSION OF INFORMATION REPORT5 ING REQUIREMENTS. 

6 Section 9006 of the Patient Protection and Afford7 able Care Act, and the amendments made thereby, are 

8 hereby repealed; and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

9 shall be applied as if such section, and amendments, had 

10 never been enacted. 

11 SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF UNSPENT FEDERAL FUNDS TO OFF12 SET LOSS IN REVENUES. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi14 sion of law, of all available unobligated funds, 

15 $39,000,000,000 in appropriated discretionary funds are 

16 hereby rescinded. 

17 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Director of the Office of 

18 Management and Budget shall determine and identify 

19 from which appropriation accounts the rescission under 

20 subsection (a) shall apply and the amount of such rescis21 sion that shall apply to each such account. Not later than 

22 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

23 Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 

24 submit a report to the Secretary of the Treasury and Con25 gress of the accounts and amounts determined and identi26 fied for rescission under the preceding sentence. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 18 IS

1 (c) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply to the 

2 unobligated funds of the Department of Defense or the 

3 Department of Veterans Affairs. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
## DF-mRTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N 

# Count yo f Sa n Dieg o -WOPERATION S 20! 0 OC T- U A R : 2 U PALOMA R AIRPOR T ADVISOR Y COMMITTE E

McClellan-Paloma rAirpor t Chuc k Collin s Chairperso n 219 2 Paloma rAirpor t Roa d Carlsbad , C A 9201 1 (760 ) 431-464 6 FAX : (760 ) 931-571 3

We b Site : http://www.5dcounty.ca.gov/dpw/alrports/palomar.htm l Augus t 18' ^

201 0 Th e Honorabl e RayLaHoo d Secretary . U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse yAvenue . S E Washingto n D.C . 2059 0 Dea rSecretar

yLaHood : I woul d lik e t o conve ym ysuppor t an d th e suppor

t o f th e Paloma rAirpor t Advisor yCommittee , fo rth e Count yo f Sa n Diego' s applicatio n an d proposa l fo ra $500,00 0 gran t fro m th e Departmen t o f Transportatio n unde rth e Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Program . Thi s woul d provid e essentia l fundin g neede d fo rmarketin g an d ne w ai rservic e developmen t a t McClellan-Paloma rAirport . McClellan-Paloma rAirpor t serve s a populatio n bas e o f ove ron e millio n resident s an d wa s recentl y revKalize d wit h a S3

0 millio n investmen t i n a ne w commercia l ai rtermina l building , additiona l taxiways . large raircraf t parkin g ramps , a custom s facility , ne w automobil e parkin g lots , a s wel l a s a n additiona l S1 0 millio n runwayreconstructio n project . Althoug h th e communit ypopulatio n ha s grow n by28 % thi s commercia l airpor

t ha s experience d a 60 % reductio n i n passenge rthroughpu t ove rth e las t 1 0 year s becaus e i t i s onl yservice d byon e airlin e wit h restricte d operation s t o a singl e Lo s Angele s location . Ai rservic e developmen t an d marketin g i s desperatel yneeded.t o attrac t ne w ai rservic e tha t wil l enhanc e regiona l transportatio n option s fo rou rare a residents , hel p stimulat e th e Nort h Countyeconomy , an d encourag e jo b growth . O n behal f o f th e Paloma rAirport Advisor yCommittee , I strongl yencourag e yo u t o awar d a gran t t o Sa n Dieg o Count yAirport s t o develo p smal l communityai rservic e a t McClellan-Palpma rAirport . Than k yo u fo ryou rconsideration . Sincerely , PALOMA R AIRPOR T ADVISOR Y COMMITTE E Chairp^rso^n

Kid $ • Th e Environmen t • Safe an d Livabl e Communitie s
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert A. POWELL.

No. 98-KH-3086.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re Powell, Robert A.} — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 98-6229.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the filing to the district court for its consideration.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
Before the Second Division,

February 4, 1941

No. 45343.

#### Protest 13739-K of Louis Greenberg & Son (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 43372 the tape measures in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2444

JOHN M. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BARBARA A. MORGAN, Individually and as Solicitor for the Second Judicial Circuit of the

State of South Carolina,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

BUSTER EDWARDS, Individually and as Agent of

State Law Enforcement Division, an Agency of

the State of South Carolina; STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, an Agency of the State of

South Carolina,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA96-2763-8-1)

Submitted: May 11, 1999 Decided: May 27, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lex A. Rogerson, Jr., Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellant.

Paul H. Derrick, LIDE, MONTGOMERY & POTTS, P.C., Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

John M. Smith appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of Appellee Morgan on his 42 U.S.C.A.

§ 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. On appeal, Smith frames the

issue as whether the district court erred in holding that his

claims against Morgan for acts alleged to be outside of the scope

of her prosecutorial immunity were barred by res judicata. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6593.

Entry No. 710955, etc.

Invoices dated Norwich, England, July 28, 1941, etc.

Certified July 30, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 27, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 10, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

MonnisoN, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Daniel BUTLER, Appellee.

No. 97-4028.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1998.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 27, 1998.

*345Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rochelle L. Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jeffrey M. Harris, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

FARMER, Judge.

Defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of robbery and was sentenced under the Florida Youthful Offender Statute (YOS).1 The trial court withheld adjudication, but sentenced him to 18 months in prison, followed by 1 year on probation. This appeal follows.

Both parties agree that the defendant was sentenced pursuant to section 958.04(2)(c), of the Youthful Offender Statute, which provides that:

> “The court may impose a split sentence whereby the youthful offender is to be placed on probation or community control upon completion of any specified period of incarceration; however, if the incarceration period is to be served in a department facility other than a probation and restitution center or community residential facility, such period shall be for not less than 1 year or more than 4 years.”

At the same time, section 958.04(2)(b) allows incarceration as a condition of probation or community control, as here, in a community or county facility or in a probation or restitution center, but limits the term of such incarceration to np more than 364 days.

In *State v. Oates,*610 So.2d 522 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), the court held that a sentence functionally indistinguishable from the sentence in this case was improper and unauthorized by the statute under which it was imposed. There as here, the court imposed incarceration under the YOS as a condition of probation or community control, but imposed a stated term greater than 364 days. The court noted that adjudication may not be withheld when the defendant is incarcerated, unless the term of incarceration does not exceed 364 days. We agree with the reasoning of *Oates*and adopt it in this district.

We vacate Butler’s sentence and remand with instiuctions that, upon adjudication of guilt, he may again be sentenced to incarceration or, alternatively, the court may decline to adjudicate him guilty and sentence him to a term of incarceration as a condition of probation so long as the incarcerative portion does not exceed 364 days.

REVERSED.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

1

. *See*§ 958.04, Fla. Stat. (1997).
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Veronica Chen,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
November 9, 2009
 
 /s/
      Veronica ChenVeronica
      Chen
                    Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                             394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,528
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,241
<PP&E>                                           6,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,148
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           236
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,607
<SALES>                                        114,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,994
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,683)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (557)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,240)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of China Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shuwen Kang, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 14, 2011/s/ Shuwen KangShuwen Kang, Principal Executive Officer
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 20119 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Eleazar Gonzalez**

**- Cortes,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 632

- 1

Before **Smith, Dennis,**  and **Southwick,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eleazar Gonzalez

- Cortes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez

- Cortes has not filed a

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 3, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-20119 Document: 00516493376 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/03/2022No. 22

- 20119

2 response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue fo r appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 22-20119 Document: 00516493376 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/03/2022
No. 47084.

#### Protest 52799-K of Geo. Borgfeldt Corp. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Certain of the plain woven cotton cloth table covers and napkins in question were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 911 (b) in view of T. D. 50277, and in accordance with .stipulation of counsel.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF JOHN J. THOMAS, 

DECEASED

PETITION OF: TIMOTHY J. UNGAREAN

:

:

:

:

:

No. 202 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Before the Second Division,

March 31, 1942

No. 47018.

#### Protests 988012-G, etc., of Franklin Simon & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel certain woven silk mufflers, hemmed, similar to those involved in Abstract 45938 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 as claimed. It was also stipulated that certain items consist of woven silk mufflers, hemmed, not block-printed by hand, and valued at more than $5 per dozen. These were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 1209 by virtue of the British Trade Agreement (T. D. 49753). Protests sustained in part.
No. 39216.

#### Protest 946753-G of Henle Wax Paper Mfg. Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of sheets of material composed of compounds of cellulose the same as that the subject of *Birn*v. *Dupont*(17 C. C. P. A. 122, T. D. 43454). The claim at 40 cents per pound under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 24.1
               Consent of Ernst and Young LLP Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in:

-  Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-15081) dated October 30, 1996 pertaining to
   Imatron Inc. Stock Bonus Incentive Plan
-  Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-11515) dated September 6, 1996 and related
   Prospectus
-  Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-9989) dated August 12, 1996 pertaining to
   Imatron Inc. 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
-  Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-6749) dated June 25, 1996 and related 
   Prospectus 
-  Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-3529) dated May 10, 1996 and related 
   Prospectus 
-  Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-647) dated February 2, 1996 and related
   Prospectus
-  Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-63123) dated October 2, 1995 and related
   Prospectus
-  Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-61179) dated July 20, 1995 pertaining to 1993
   Stock Option Plan
-  Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-71786) dated November 15, 1993 pertaining to
   1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
-  Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-66992) dated August 3, 1993 pertaining to 1993
   Stock Option Plan
-  Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-66952) dated August 3, 1993 pertaining to 1991
   Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
-  Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40391) dated May 6, 1991 pertaining to Director
   Stock Option Grant
-  Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-28662) dated May 11, 1989 pertaining to 1983
   Stock Option Plan
-  Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-26833) dated February 3, 1989 pertaining to
   1984 Employee Stock Participation Plan

of our report dated  February 14, 1997,  except for Note 12 as to which the date
is April 10, 1998 with  respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Imatron Inc. for the year ended  December  31, 1996  (restated)  and
1995 included in the Annual  Report on Form 10K for the year ended  December 31,
1997.
                                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Francisco, California
April 24, 1998