alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014135EN.01001701.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona — Spain) — Antonio Márquez Samohano v Universitat Pompeu Fabra

(Case C-190/13) (1)

1

((Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Universities - Associate lecturers - Successive fixed-term employment contracts - Clause 5(1) - Measures to prevent the abusive use of fixed-term contracts - Concept of ‘objective reasons’ justifying such contracts - Clause 3 - Concept of ‘employment contract of indefinite duration’ - Penalties - Right to compensation - Difference in treatment between permanent workers))

2014/C 135/18

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Antonio Márquez Samohano

Applicant:

Defendant: Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Juzgado de lo Social No 3 de Barcelona — Interpretation of clauses 3 and 5 of the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43) — Employment contracts concluded with the public administration — University professors — Absence of measures to prevent the abusive use of successive fixed-term employment contracts.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Clause 5 of the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as not precluding national rules, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which allow universities to renew successive fixed-term employment contracts concluded with associate lecturers, with no limitation as to the maximum duration and the number of renewals of those contracts, where such contracts are justified by an objective reason within the meaning of clause 5(1)(a), which is a matter for the referring court to verify. However, it is also for that court to ascertain that, in the main proceedings, the renewal of the successive fixed-term employment contracts at issue was actually intended to cover temporary needs and that rules such as those at issue in the main proceedings were not, in fact, used to meet fixed and permanent needs in terms of employment of teaching staff.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

1

---
No. 40505.

#### Protest 677721-G of Imoto Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 47647) the merchandise in question was held free of duty under paragraph 1703 as claimed.
No. 42137.

#### Protest 150876-G of Kalil Akkoul (New York).

'Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551) the laces in question were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
July 1, 2015

Mr. Bryce Fountain

80 Ravens Croft

Vernon, CT 06066

Dear Mr. Fountain

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your April 17, 2015, exemption request into the public docket 

(No. FAA−2015−1234), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Aircraft and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2055 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect to the protection 

of certain information. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2012 

Mr. SHELBY (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect 

to the protection of certain information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GUARANTEE OF PRIVILEGE. 

4 Section 18(x) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act 

5 (12 U.S.C. 1828(x)) is amended by striking paragraph (1) 

6 and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The submission by any per8 son of any information to any Federal banking agen9 cy, State bank supervisor, foreign banking authority, 

10 or the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection for 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2055 IS

1 any purpose in the course of any supervisory or reg2 ulatory process of the agency, supervisor, authority, 

3 or Bureau shall not be construed as waiving, de4 stroying, or otherwise affecting any privilege such 

5 person may claim with respect to such information 

6 under Federal or State law as to any person or enti7 ty other than such agency, supervisor, authority, or 

8 Bureau.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered March 6, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01261

- CR

DONALD OZUMBA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judici al District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380

- 82145

- 2017



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk to issue the mandate in

this appeal INSTANTER.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
S HERRY R ADACK

C HIEF J USTICE

T ERRY J ENNINGS

E VELYN K EYES

L AURA C ARTER H IGLEY

J ANE B LAND

M ICHAEL M ASSENGALE

H ARVEY B ROWN

R EBECA H UDDLE

R USSELL L LOYD

J USTICES 

## Court of Appeals

First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066 C HRISTOPHER A. P RINE

C LERK OF THE C OURT

J ANET W ILLIAMS

C HIEF S TAFF A TTORNEY

P HONE : 713-274-2700

F AX : 713-755-8131

www.1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us

May 5, 2015

Elena Aviles

Document Project

Innocent Project

40 Worth Street, Suite 701

New York, NY 10013

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-96-01502-CR Trial Court Case Number: 731520

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-96-01503-CR Trial Court Case Number: 731519

Style: Kenneth Sherman v. The State of Texas

We are forwarding the following via Certified Mail (tracking # 7011 0110 0001 3415

2386):

Enclosed is a CD copy of the court’s records in the above referenced cause.

Please sign the attached copy and return to show receipt.

Sincerely,

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

By Jesse Rodriguez, Deputy Clerk IVS HERRY R ADACK

C HIEF J USTICE

T ERRY J ENNINGS

E VELYN K EYES

L AURA C ARTER H IGLEY

J ANE B LAND

M ICHAEL M ASSENGALE

H ARVEY B ROWN

R EBECA H UDDLE

R USSELL L LOYD

J USTICES 

## Court of Appeals

First District

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066 C HRISTOPHER A. P RINE

C LERK OF THE C OURT

J ANET W ILLIAMS

C HIEF S TAFF A TTORNEY

P HONE : 713-274-2700

F AX : 713-755-8131

www.1stcoa.courts.state.tx.us

May 5, 2015

Elena Aviles

Document Project

Innocent Project

40 Worth Street, Suite 701

New York, NY 10013

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-96-01502-CR Trial Court Case Number: 731520

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 01-96-01503-CR Trial Court Case Number: 731519

Style: Kenneth Sherman v. The State of Texas

We are forwarding the following via Certified Mail (tracking # 7011 0110 0001 3415

2386):

Enclosed is a CD copy of the court’s records in the above referenced cause.

Please sign below and return to show receipt.

Sincerely,

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court

By Jesse Rodriguez, Deputy Clerk IV

RETURN RECEIPT

Received by__________________________ Date Received_______________________
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Command opens doors to associates at annual holiday event

DLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime command team hosted an Open House Dec. 11 as part of their annual holiday festivities. DLA Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. John Palmer, his wife Brooks, Deputy Commander Kenneth Watson and his wife Jill welcomed hundreds of associates and posed for pictures inside the Operations Center command suite. DLA Land and Maritime's Acquisition Executive Mark Brown, Chief of Staff Air Force Col. Janette Ketchum and Griff Warren, director of operations, also participated in the holiday tradition. Each office area was decorated for the season, and light refreshments were available in the command conference room. 

Click here to access the photo gallery (CAC-enabled). 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Command L&MCulture L&MHeritage and Diversity L&M
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 12

- 00453

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z .L.P., A CHILD

From the 77th District Court

Limestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. CPS

- 235

- A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Timothy Thomas, has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss his

appeal in this matter. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Dismissal of this appeal would not

prevent the parties from seeking relief to which they would otherwise be entitled. The

motion is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis

, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 9, 2013

[CV06]
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-70530,
333-63517 and 333-45144) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Carreker Corporation 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan and the Carreker Corporation Director Stock Option Plan of
our reports dated April 26, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Carreker Corporation, Carreker Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Carreker Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended January 31, 2006.



Dallas,
Texas
April 26, 2006

---



QuickLinks
January
      9, 2008

    


    


    Catherine
      M. Vaczy

    140
      East
      28th
      Street

    #11C

    New
      York,
      NY 10016

    


    Dear
      Catherine:

    


    This
      letter is being written to serve as an amendment to the employment agreement
      by
      and between you and NeoStem, Inc. (the “Company”) dated as of January 26, 2007
      pursuant to which you serve as the Company’s Vice President and General Counsel.
      Except as set forth herein, your employment agreement shall remain unchanged.
      Initially capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the
      meaning set forth in the employment agreement. 

    


    Pursuant
      to the terms of your employment agreement, you are entitled for calendar year
      2008 to a minimum annual base salary equal to $172,500. In
      response to the Company's efforts to conserve cash, you have agreed to accept
      for 2008 an annual base salary of $161,250 and accept $11,250 in shares of
      the
      Company's Common Stock valued at the closing price of the Common Stock on
      December 19, 2007, net of shares in payment of applicable withholding taxes
      valued at the closing price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance.
Accordingly,
      on December 19, 2007, by resolution approved by the Compensation Committee
      you
      were issued on December 19, 2007 under the Company’s 2003 Equity Purchase Plan
      (the “EPP”) 3,729 shares of Common Stock. Also on December 19, 2007, the
      Compensation Committee awarded you (i) a stock award of 10,000 shares of Common
      Stock; and (ii) an option to purchase 12,000 shares of Common Stock at a per
      share exercise price equal to $1.70 (the closing price of the Common Stock
      on
      the date of grant) fully vested and exercisable in its entirety on the date
      of
      grant. 

     

    Except
      as
      provided in this letter agreement, the terms of the employment agreement shall
      remain unchanged.

    


    Very
      truly yours,

    


    


    NeoStem,
      Inc.

    By:
      /s/
      Robin Smith 

    Name:
      Robin Smith

    Title:
      CEO

    


    Accepted
      and Agreed:

    


    /s/
      Catherine M. Vaczy

    Catherine
      M. Vaczy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         150,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  796,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,904,723
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,079,203
<PP&E>                                       2,629,531
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,846,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,952,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,657,399
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                       181,905
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,952,265
<SALES>                                      6,560,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,662,741
<CGS>                                        2,343,994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,956,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,442,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,571,462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,571,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,571,462)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 28.1

                    [Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. Logo]

Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
Wilmington, DE

March 15, 2000



Management Report on Internal Control Over Servicing of Securitized Automobile
Financing Receivables

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. is responsible for establishing
and maintaining an effective system of internal control over servicing of
securitized automobile financing receivables, which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper servicing of securitized automobile
financing receivables. The system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and
actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal
control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system
can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to servicing of securitized
automobile financing receivables. Further, because of changes in conditions, the
effectiveness of an internal control system may vary over time.

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its system of internal
control over servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables as of
December 31, 1999 in relation to criteria for effective internal control
described in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 1999, the Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables.

                                          /s/Keith Schuck
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Keith Schuck
                                          Vice President
                                          Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
**Exhibit 32.2**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig A. Knock, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Craig A. Knock
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19726]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Intergovernmental Advisory Committee Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee will meet on August 
7, 1997, at the Double Tree Hotel in Port Angeles, Washington. The 
purpose of the meeting is to continue discussions on the implementation 
of the Northwest Forest Plan. The meeting will begin at 8:00 a.m. and 
continue until 3:00 p.m. Agenda items to be discussed include, but are 
not limited to: effectiveness monitoring and a series of informational 
presentations on activities on the Olympic Peninsula. The IAC meeting 
will be open to the public and is fully accessible for people with 
disabilities. Interpreters are available upon request in advance. 
Written comments may be submitted for the record at the meeting. Time 
will also be scheduled for oral public comments. Interested persons are 
encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding this meeting may 
be directed to Don Knowles, Executive Director, Regional Ecosystem 
Office, 333 SW 1st Avenue, P.O. Box 3623, Portland, OR 97208 (Phone: 
503-808-2180).

    Dated: July 21, 1997.
Donald R. Knowles,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 97-19726 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
No. 47051.

#### Protest 996892-G of Quong Lee & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

A sample of the knives showed that in form and shape they resemble what is commonly known as a cleaver such as those *eo nomine*provided for in paragraph 355. From the testimony presented it was found that the articles are not specially designed for other than household, kitchen, or butchers’ use, and that the blades measure 4 inches or more in length, exclusive of the wooden handles. In accordance therewith they were held properly classified at 8 cents each and 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 355 and T. D. 49753.