alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015046EN.01001401.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-576/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Dock-work undertakings - Management of workers for the provision of cargo-handling services - Prohibition on using workers on the employment market))

(2015/C 046/18)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Nicolae and S. Pardo Quintillán, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, Agent)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by obliging undertakings of other Member States wishing to exercise the activity of cargo-handling in Spanish ports of general interest, first, to register with the Dockers’ Management Public Limited Liability Company (‘Sociedad Anónima de Gestion de Estibadores Portuarios’) and, as appropriate, to hold shares in that company and, secondly, to employ as a priority workers provided by that company, including a minimum number on permanent contracts, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by obliging undertakings of other Member States wishing to exercise the activity of cargo-handling in Spanish ports of general interest, first, to register with the Dockers’ Management Public Limited Liability Company (‘Sociedad Anónima de Gestion de Estibadores Portuarios’) and, as appropriate, to hold shares in that company and, secondly, to employ as a priority workers provided by that company, including a minimum number on permanent contracts, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
## SERVED: Aprill,2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### AERO MICRONESIA FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0468
IN THE MATTER OF 

### AERO MICRONESIA FAADOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0469 

### ORDER ON VENUE I.:. 'I •**~** : •

The Federal AviationAdministration (hereinafter "Complainant") and Aero Micronesia (hereinafter "Respondent")have both giventhe court theirpositions onVenue. WHEREFORE, Venue shall remain Honolulu, Hawaii. The court anticipates scheduling this case after June 1, 2014.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

1SERVICE LIST 

### ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### David M. Kirstein Lyndsey M. Grunewald 

### ONE COPY

Kirstein & 

### Young, PLLC, Respondent's Counsel 

### 1750 K Street, N.W., Suite 200

.Washington, DC 20006

TEL: 202-331-3348 Fax: 202-331-3933 Michael R. Quinn, President Aero Micronesia, Inc., dba Pacific AirlinesRespondent 

### 156 Diablo Road, Suite 203 Danville, CA 94526 TEL: 925-362-4430 FAX: 925-362-4432 Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofRegional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.4 

### Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAX: 310-725-6816 FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0468 & 

### FAA-2012-0469 (Civil Penalty Actions)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue; S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2

### FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0468 & 

### FAA-2012-0469 (Civil Penalty Actions)
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

3
#### C.J., a Minor Child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-4010.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 21, 1998.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Siobhan Helene Shea, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse an order adjudicating appellant delinquent and remand for the court to make written findings because the trial court did not give his reasons on the record or in the written order as is required by section 39.052(4)(e) 1, Florida Statutes (Supp.1996).

GUNTHER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
# C_2015127EN.01000301.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/3

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Mirko Saba

(Case C-652/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Identical questions referred - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Games of chance - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences with a shorter period than that of licences awarded in the past - Restriction - Overriding reasons of general interest - Proportionality))

(2015/C 127/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Cagliari

Criminal proceedings against

Criminal proceedings against

Mirko Saba

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that in issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders relating to licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded in the past due to a reorganisation of the licencing system through an alignment of licence expiry dates.

---

(1)  OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.

1

---
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Earnings in Wholesale Trade, June 1958 : Distribution of Nonsupervisory Workers in Selected Wholesale Trade Industries by Straight-Time Hourly Earnings

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Earnings in Wholesale Trade, June 1958 : Distribution of Nonsupervisory Workers in Selected Wholesale Trade Industries by Straight-Time Hourly Earnings : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1253*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1959,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4540,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
(Reap. Dec. 9713)

#### Eugene Dietzgen Co., Inc. National Carloading Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 803462.

(Decided May 24, 1960)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

Certain drawing instruments and cases exported from West Germany comprise the subject, merchandise of the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement. •

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the counsel for the Plaintiff [sic] and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the merchandise, covered by the above appeal for reappraisement, and described below by catalog numbers, consists of drawing instruments and cases which in the decision of *Keuffel & Esser Co.*vs. *United States,*Abstract No. 59557, were held to be separately dutiable; and that the cases and drawing instruments, in accordance with that decision, should be appraises [sic] separately instead of as an entirety; and that the market value or price at the time of exportation of *734the drawing instruments and cases covered by the above appeal for reappraisement at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Western Germany in usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States plus the cost of all containers and all coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in question, packed ready for shipment to the United States was as set forth below; that the weight of the cases was as set forth below:

> Value of drawing Value of Weight of Catalog No. Instruments cases case (lbs.)

> 1096_'_$2.27 . 71 .595

> 1097_ 2.52 .65 .550

> 1097 DC_ 2.97 .74 .550

> 1098 DC_!_ 3.09 1.14 . 485

> 1092_ 1.00 .33 .285

> 1096 LC_ 2.58 . 95 . 530

> 982_ 13.80 1.12 .340

> 1094_ 1.62 . 44 . 375

> IT IS FURTHER STIPUDATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of Western Germany.

Upon the agreed facts before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(d)), is the proper basis of value for the drawing instruments and cases in issue and that said value is as set forth in the tabulation above.

As to any other merchandise, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use in MDS Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended October 31, 2004 of our report dated December 14, 2004 (except for note 29 which is at December 23, 2004) with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MDS Inc. for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-12056, 333-12058, 333-12548, and 333-13538) of our report dated December 14, 2004 (except for note 29 which is at December 23, 2004) with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MDS Inc.for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 included in the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended October 31, 2004.

Toronto, Canada,

March 17, 2005.	Chartered Accountants
No. 96-5987.

#### Jones et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 26, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00299-CV

RANDY WALKER, Appellant

V.

THOMAS D. WINDSOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1027482

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 25, 2013. The clerk’s 

record was filed April 5, 2013. The reporter’s record was filed January 21, 2014. 

No brief was filed.

On May 6, 2014, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant 

submitted a brief on or before June 5, 2014, the court would dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
2

Appellant filed no response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
#### GUARANTEE SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION, INC. v. Rebecca B. ANTHONY and Scottsdale Insurance Company.

No. 98-C-2701.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Anthony, Rebecca B.; Scottsdale Insurance; — Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CA97 1877; Parish of Tangipahoa 21st Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 9403519.

Denied.

VICTORY, J. not on panel.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 91 (Friday, May 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26414-26415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, 
Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 25, 2008, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act'') , Network Centric Operations 
Industry Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Iridium Satellite LLC, Bethesda, MD; AEG 
SPIN S.A., Warsaw, POLAND; AMPER Programas de Electronica y 
Comunicaciones, S.A., Getafe, Madrid, SPAIN; Bellcomm Information 
Systems, Madrid, SPAIN; Technop[ocirc]le Defence & Security, Quebec 
City, Quebec, CANADA; HAVELSAN Hava Elektronik Sanayi ye Ticaret A.S., 
Ankara, TURKEY; and BEA Government Systems, McLean, VA have been added 
as parties to this venture.
    Also, ANTs Software Inc., Burlingame, CA; Whitney, Bradley & Brown, 
Inc., Vienna, VA; Cubic Defense Applications, Inc., San Diego, CA; and 
Argon ST, Inc., Fairfax, VA have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 19, 2004, Network Centric Operations Industry 
Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal

[[Page 26415]]

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 
5486).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 8, 
2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on February 8, 2008 (73 FR 7592).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
 [FR Doc. E8-10136 Filed 5-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# C_2013225EN.01005503.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/55

---

Appeal brought on 17 September 2012 by Holding kompanija Interspeed a.d. against the judgment delivered on 10 July 2012 in Case T-587/10 Holding kompanija Interspeed a.d. v Commission

(Case C-471/12 P)

2013/C 225/104

Language of the case: Slovene

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Holding kompanija Interspeed a.d. (represented by D. Komlensky and P. Komljenovic, odvetnika)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 20 June 2013, the Court (Seventh Chamber) hereby:

By order of 20 June 2013, the Court (Seventh Chamber) hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the application for legal aid. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application for legal aid.

| 2. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 3. | Orders Holding kompanija Interspeed a.d. to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Holding kompanija Interspeed a.d. to bear its own costs.

---
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Boaz RAFAELI, Appellant.

No. 72303.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 31, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 30,1998.

Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 24, 1998.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

John P. Quarenghi, Asst. Pros. Atty., Clayton, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Boaz Rafaeli, appeals from the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury found him guilty of third degree assault, RSMo section 565.070 (1994).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of DatalinkCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Greg R. Meland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Greg R. Meland      |           |
|-------------------------|----------------|
|                    |
| Greg R. Meland          |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
| Dated:                  | March 19, 2004 |
|                         |                |  |

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of DatalinkCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Daniel J. Kinsella, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Daniel J. Kinsella                                |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |
| Daniel J. Kinsella                                    |
| Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial  Officer |
|                                                  |
| Dated:                                                |   | March 19, 2004 |
|                                                       |        |  |  |

 

----
# C_2015205EN.01000601.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 April 2015 — Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union

(Case C-605/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic - Measures directed against persons and entities benefiting from the regime - Proof that inclusion on the lists is well founded - Set of indicia))

(2015/C 205/07)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Issam Anbouba (represented by: M.-A. Bastin, J.-M. Salva, and S. Orlandi, avocats)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro, R. Liudvinaviciute and M.-M. Joséphidès, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Issam Anbouba to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Issam Anbouba to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.

1

---
No. 55628.

#### Air Clearance Assn., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 170403-K etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of live birds similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alfred Mazer*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 67, C. D. 1265), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### Harry Levy et al. *v.*United States

No. 6567.

Entry No. 746308, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, Marcii 6, 1942, etc.

Certified March 13, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 2, 1942, etc.

(Decided December 4, 1946)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues involved herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.

*453Upon the facts agreed to, and following the authority cited, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any additions made by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the' appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.