alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSouth Shore Resources Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period endedJune 30, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Michael Kabin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13thday of August, 2007.

MICHAEL KABINMichael KabinChief Executive Officer























---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7162

GAYLON RICHARD COX,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

C. RATLEDGE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:14-hc-02069-BO)

Submitted: March 17, 2020 Decided: March 30, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gaylon Richard Cox, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gaylon Richard Cox, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition in which his sought to challenge his sentence by way 

of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018). Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may 

challenge his sentence in a traditional writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 if a § 2255 

motion would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. 

[Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of a sentence 

when: (1) at the time of sentencing, settled law of this circuit or the Supreme 

Court established the legality of the sentence; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s 

direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the aforementioned settled substantive 

law changed and was deemed to apply retroactively on collateral review; 

(3) the prisoner is unable to meet the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255(h)(2) 

for second or successive motions; and (4) due to this retroactive change, the 

sentence now presents an error sufficiently grave to be deemed a fundamental 

defect.

United States v. Wheeler, 886 F.3d 415, 429 (4th Cir. 2018). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. However, we modify the dismissal order, Cox 

v. Ratledge, No. 5:14-hc-02069-BO (E.D.N.C. July 22, 2019), to reflect dismissal without 

prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, and affirm the dismissal as modified, 28 U.S.C. § 2106 

(2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
No. 42136.

#### Protests 441141-G, etc., of Stern Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of filet lace articles similar to those passed upon in *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and Normandy lace articles like those the subject of *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 id. 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
# C_2015065EN.01000501.xml

| 23.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken, Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Q

(Case C-133/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Tax legislation - Gift tax - Exemption in respect of an ‘estate’ - No exemption in respect of property situated in the territory of another Member State))

(2015/C 065/06)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken, Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Applicants:

Defendant: Q

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which an exemption from gift tax relating to certain properties that are protected on account of their forming part of the national cultural and historical heritage is limited to those properties situated in the territory of that Member State, provided that that exemption is not excluded in the case of properties that may form part of the cultural and historical heritage of that Member State despite being located in the territory of another State.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report of Caneum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: August 21, 2007   /s/ Suki Mudan Suki Mudan, President  (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001057672
<NAME> PBOC HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,582
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    771,864
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,326
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,274
<LOANS>                                      2,483,888
<ALLOWANCE>                                     21,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,398,228
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,647,337
<SHORT-TERM>                                   763,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             66,625
<LONG-TERM>                                    741,109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           219
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,398,228
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                166,595
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               58,587
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,246
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               230,428
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              72,291
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             161,677
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           68,751
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,747
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (3,217)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 38,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,773
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      30,273
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  6,678
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,951
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,178
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 6,470
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                18,897
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,096
<RECOVERIES>                                       503
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               21,051
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            21,051
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
# C_2013032EN.01002501.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/25

---

Action brought on 8 December 2012 — Still v OHIM (Fleet Data Services)

(Case T-534/12)

2013/C 32/39

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Still GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by S. Waller, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2012 in Case R 130/2012-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2012 in Case R 130/2012-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs;

| — | Join the case under Article 50(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court with the action brought in parallel against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) in Case R 4/2012-1, also of 10 September 2012, regarding the Community trade mark application ‘Truck Data Services’, application No 009931429. |
| --- | --- |

—

Join the case under Article 50(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court with the action brought in parallel against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) in Case R 4/2012-1, also of 10 September 2012, regarding the Community trade mark application ‘Truck Data Services’, application No 009931429.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark including the word elements ‘Fleet Data Services’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 35, 36, 37 and 39 — Community trade mark application No 9 931 387

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

| — | Infringement of the second sentence of Article [75] of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the second sentence of Article [75] of Regulation No 207/2009

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of the ComCam, Inc. ("Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Commission on
the date hereof, I, Don Gilbreath, president and chief financial officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) This 10-KSB complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act; and

(2) The financial information contained in this Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Don Gilbreath
Don Gilbreath, President and Chief Financial Officer








                                      18
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03030**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03030\03030_Checklist_092310_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03030\03030_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03030\03030_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03030\03030_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03030\03030_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03030\03030_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03030\Certification Statement Plant ID 03030.pdf Plant certification statement x 03030\Supplemental Documentation\03030_A5-2 Brazos Valley Facility Map (with Legend).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03030\Supplemental Documentation\03030_A5-3 Water Balance Brazos.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
SJNB Financial Corp.

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos.  33-31392 and 333-89013) on Form S-8 of SJNB Financial Corp. of our report
dated  January 13, 2000,  relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of SJNB
Finanicial  Corp.  and  subsidiary  as of December  31,  1999 and 1998,  and the
related   consolidated   statements   of   income,   shareholders'   equity  and
comprehensive  income,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended  December 31, 1999,  which report appears in the December 31, 1999,
annual report on Form 10-K of SJNB Finanical Corp.


/s/KPMG

San Francisco, California
April 10, 2000
#### Stoughton *v.*Vogt, Appellant.

No. 2.

Argued April 20, 1926.

Appeal No. 84, April T., 1926, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Butler County, December T., 1925, No. 17, in the case of Lu*399cdnda Stoughton v. C. J. Viogt.

Before Porter, P'. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.

Affirmed.

July 8, 1926:

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

This ease was tried with the ease of A. L. Stoughton v. C. J. Vogt, No. 83, April Term, 1926, and was argued with that ease on the hearing of the appeals. All the questions involved were presented and considered in the ease above referred to in an opinion this day handed down. For the reasons' there stated the assignments in this appeal are overruled and the judgment 'affirmed.
EX-10.2






Mr. Sour Chhor


18, Rue du Miroir


91200 Athis Mons


FRANCE



Ismaning,



Side Letter to Employment Contract



Dear Sour,



Upon acceptance of your employment contract we hereby confirm, that your Business Round Trips
for SCM can start and end in France.



In addition the bonus payment for Q1 2008 is to 100% guaranteed.



For the time period of 6 months of your employment SCM will reimburse the costs for an
apartement in the Munich area. If you take permanent residence in the Munich area SCM shall
reimburse the adequate costs of the work-related relocation of the Employee’s household
(including costs for adequate insurance of the household goods during transport and courtage)
from France to the Munich area, up to 10.000 Euro, incl. VAT, if the Employee has agreed with
SCM in advance on the costs, against due receipts. Should the total amount of the relocation of
Employee’s household be less than. In addition SCM shall reimburse the brokerage fee for
housing agency.



SCM will also take over the costs for the weekly flights from Munich to Paris and back, if you
have agreed with SCM in advance on the costs and against due receipts.



We look forward to welcome you at SCM.



Best regards,



SCM Microsystems GmbH



Felix Marx


Managing Director
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11


                Statement Re-computation of Per Share Earnings
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               December 31,
                                                        --------------------------

                                                          1996              1995
                                                          ----              ----

Net Income per common share, primary:

<S>                                                    <C>               <C>
   Net Income                                          $2,462,892        $3,843,886

   Less: Preferred Dividends                              108,419           184,114
                                                       ----------        ----------

   Net Income Available to Common Shareholders          2,354,473         3,659,772


Average Shares Outstanding                              5,545,605         4,688,335

Common stock equivalents-Convertible Preferred          1,415,474           710,396
                                                       ----------        ----------

Adjusted Average Shares Outstanding                     6,961,079         5,398,731
                                                       ==========        ==========

Net Income per common share                            $     0.34        $     0.68
                                                       ==========        ==========


Net Income per common share, fully diluted:

   Net Income                                          $2,462,892        $3,843,886


Average Shares Outstanding Outstanding                  5,545,605         4,688,335

Shares issuable on conversion of preferred stock        1,717,178         1,440,786
                                                       ----------        ----------

Average shares outstanding assuming full dilution       7,262,783         6,129,121
                                                       ==========        ==========


Fully diluted earnings per share                       $     0.34        $     0.63
                                                       ==========        ==========
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Global-Tech Appliances Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended;and 

(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 20-F. 

Date: September 30, 2008 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon requested.
#### DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP and Frank Paredes, Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-1405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 9, 1998.

Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin and Joel Perwin, Miami, for appellants.

Tew Cardenas Rebak Kellogg Lehman De-Maria & Tague and Matías R. Dorta and Joseph Rebak, Miami, for appellee.

Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEYIN, JJ.

*335PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Tindall v. Smith,*601 So.2d 627 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); *Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Florida Physicians’ Ins. Reciprocal,*507 So.2d 778 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
# C_2014439EN.01001001.xml

| 8.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 October 2014 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission

(Case C-429/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Cohesion fund - Reduction of financial assistance - Irregularities in the application of the public procurement legislation - Adoption of the decision by the European Commission - Failure to comply with the time-limit - Consequences))

(2014/C 439/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: B. Conte and A. Tokár, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Rivas Andrés, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Spain v Commission (T-384/10, EU:T:2013:277); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Spain v Commission (T-384/10, EU:T:2013:277);

| 2. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 4147 of 30 June 2010, reducing the assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund to the following (groups of) projects: ‘Water supply to settlements in the Guadiana basin: Andévalo area’ (2000.ES.16.C.PE.133), ‘Drainage and water treatment in the Guadalquivir basin: Guadaira, Aljarafe and the areas of natural protection of the Guadalquivir’ (2000.ES.16.C.PE.066) and ‘Water supply to multi-municipal systems in the provinces of Granada and Malaga’ (2002.ES.16.C.PE.061); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 4147 of 30 June 2010, reducing the assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund to the following (groups of) projects: ‘Water supply to settlements in the Guadiana basin: Andévalo area’ (2000.ES.16.C.PE.133), ‘Drainage and water treatment in the Guadalquivir basin: Guadaira, Aljarafe and the areas of natural protection of the Guadalquivir’ (2000.ES.16.C.PE.066) and ‘Water supply to multi-municipal systems in the provinces of Granada and Malaga’ (2002.ES.16.C.PE.061);

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the Kingdom of Spain and to bear its own costs of both the proceedings at first instance and of the present appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the Kingdom of Spain and to bear its own costs of both the proceedings at first instance and of the present appeal proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---