alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.a CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Clifford Wildes, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006, of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the Company); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules13a-15 and 15d-15) for the Company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and (c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  1       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and 6. The Companys other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: August 23, 2006
        /s/ Clifford WildesClifford Wildes, Chief Executive Officer  * Provide a separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company. See Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).   2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jose Araque, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Jose Araque
    ----------------------------------
    Jose Araque, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 20, 2006
### SCWC-13-0000385
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

CAROLYN MIZUKAMI, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. DON QUIJOTE (USA) CO. LTD., DTRIC INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CAAP-13-0000385; CIV. NO. 12-1-3273-12)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C
. J
. , N a k a y a m a , A c o b a , M c K e n n a a n d P o l l a c k , J J
. )



### The application for a writ of certiorari, filed on May 24, 2013, is hereby rejected. In addition, the appellate clerk is directed not to accept any further filings in this closed certiorari proceeding.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 25, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000385 25-JUN-2013 09:24 AM
No. 46523.

#### Protest 63965-K of Ednal Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the colored sheet glass in question is similar to that the subject of Abstract 45423. In accordance therewith it was held dutiable at *l2%i*cents per pound under paragraph 219 by virtue of T. D. 45313, plus 5 percent ad valorem under paragraph 224 as claimed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 41025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16396]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 41025]]

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Notice of Cancellation of July 9 President's Global Development 
Council Meeting

AGENCY: United States Agency for International Development.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is 
hereby given of cancellation of the meeting of the President's Global 
Development Council (GDC) on Tuesday, July 9, 2013 in the Eisenhower 
Executive Office Building, South Court Auditorium, Pennsylvania Avenue 
and 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20050 which was published in the 
Federal Register on June 24, 2013, 78 FR 37775.
    A new meeting date and time will be forthcoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayne Thomisee, 202-712-5506.

    Dated: July 1, 2013.
Jayne Thomisee,
Executive Director & Policy Advisor, U.S. Agency for International 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2013-16396 Filed 7-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Air Force awards $143 million energy savings contract at DoD’s largest joint base

By J. Brian GarmonAFIMSC Public Affairs

                TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Air Force Civil Engineer Center website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Air Force Civil Engineer CenterJoint Base San AntonioDLA Energy502nd Civil Engineer Groupenergy savingsEnergy Savings Performance ContractESPC
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-1988]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL EDUCATION GOALS PANEL


Meeting

AGENCY: The National Education Goals Panel.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Education Goals Panel was established by a Joint 
Statement between the President and the Nation's governors dated July 
31, 1990. The Panel will determine how to measure and monitor progress 
toward achieving the National Education Goals and report to the nation 
on the progress toward the Goals.

TENTATIVE AGENDA ITEMS: The agenda for the meeting includes an update 
on past, current and prospective Goals Panel work related to early 
childhood and the achievement of Goal 1, including presentations of 
recent research findings on brain development. It also includes a 
report on US and international student achievement in mathematics and 
science and their implications as suggested by the recent Third 
International Mathematics and Science Study. Speakers will include 
Hollywood actor and director Rob Reiner, Harvard Nobel laureate David 
Hubel (invited), Chicago Tribune writer Ron Kotulak, Yale's Bush Center 
Lynn Kagan, U.S. TIMSS director William Schmidt, and Harvard CPRE co-
director Richard Elmore.

DATES: The National Education Goals Panel meeting is scheduled for 
Tuesday, February 4, 1997, 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The J.W. Marriott Hotel, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Salon F, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The National Education Goals Panel at (202) 632-0952.

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
Ken Nelson,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-1988 Filed 1-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4010-01-M
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT


TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Non-Invasive
Monitoring Systems, Inc. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 (the “Report”),
the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems,
Inc.




By:
              /s/ Marvin A. Sackner,
  M.D.Marvin
      A. Sackner, M.D.Chief
      Executive Officer and PresidentOctober
      28, 2009




The
certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of Non-Invasive Monitoring
Systems, Inc. or the certifying officers
#### D. Strauss Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6548.

Entry No. 762459, etc.

Invoices dated Nottingham, England, April 30, 1946, etc.

Certified May 2, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 22, 1946, etc.

(Decided November 25, 1946)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tidson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*Suit No. 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be .incorporated .herein. . .

Accepting the above stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any additions made by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 44350.

#### Protests 900393-G (C), etc., of Giuseppe Fantacci et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-2107

In re: ANTHONY ANDREWS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:22-hc-02114-FL)

Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: January 19, 2023

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Andrews, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2107 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/19/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Andrews petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court 

has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in 

the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2107 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/19/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
ONE COMMERCE SQUARE, 40 SOUTH MAIN ST., MEMPHIS, TN 38103 

March 5, 2013 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear, Sir / Madam: 

In accordance with Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14CFR) § 11.61, Pinnacle 

Airlines, Inc., REXA-257A, petitions the Administrator for an extension of Exemption No. 

3585 R to 3585 S, Docket FAA-2001-9379. 

This extension will allow Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. continuation of relief from §121.613, 

121.619(a), and 121.625 by allowing a part 121 operator to continue to dispatch airplanes 

under instrument flight rules when conditional language in a one-time increment of the 

weather forecast states that the weather at the destination, alternate airport, or both airports 

could be below the authorized weather minimums when other time increments of the 

weather forecast state the weather conditions will be at or above the authorized weather 

minimums. 

Approval of this exemption for Pinnacle Airlines will benefit the public good by improving 

the reliability of air service for many communities Pinnacle Airlines serves. 

Thank you for your consideration of our request. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you 

have any questions concerning this proposal. 

Respectfully, 

Dave Wilson 

Director, Flight Operations 

dwilson@pncl.com
No. 42158.

#### Protests 832890-G, etc., of A. & V. Mercurio et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the-authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
Before the Third Division,

April 23, 1942

No. 47117.

#### Protest 990432-G of Roger Williams (Nogales).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the record it was found that the articles in question were not acquired, nor the order for same accepted by the shipper, until after the plaintiff returned to the United States, and delivery of the same was not effected until after the postal authorities had received the e. o. d. charges. The protest was therefore overruled.
# C_2012217EN.01002402.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/24

---

Action brought on 16 May 2012 — Al Assad v Council

(Case T-202/12)

2012/C 217/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bouchra Al Assad (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: G. Karouni, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul Implementing Decision 2012/172/CFSP of 23 March 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria, in so far as it refers to Mrs Bouchra (aka Bushra) Al Assad; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Implementing Decision 2012/172/CFSP of 23 March 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria, in so far as it refers to Mrs Bouchra (aka Bushra) Al Assad;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs, in accordance with Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs, in accordance with Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law, which are for all essential purposes identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-383/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ 2011 C 282, p. 30.

1

---
# C_2015198EN.01000901.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 April 2015 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-591/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Tax legislation - Deferral of taxation of capital gains realised on the sale of certain capital assets - Recovery of the tax - Freedom of establishment - Article 49 TFEU - Article 31 of the EEA Agreement - Difference in treatment between permanent establishments located within the territory of a Member State and permanent establishments located within the territory of another Member State of the European Union or of the European Economic Area - Proportionality))

(2015/C 198/11)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and W. Roels, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and K. Petersen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force the tax scheme provided for in Paragraph 6b of the Law on Income Tax (Einkommensteuergesetz), which makes the benefit of the deferral of taxation of the capital gains realised on the sale of a capital asset forming part of the assets of a permanent establishment of the taxable person located within German territory subject to the condition that those capital gains are reinvested in the acquisition of replacement assets forming part of the assets of a permanent establishment of the taxable person located within that territory, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU and Article 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force the tax scheme provided for in Paragraph 6b of the Law on Income Tax (Einkommensteuergesetz), which makes the benefit of the deferral of taxation of the capital gains realised on the sale of a capital asset forming part of the assets of a permanent establishment of the taxable person located within German territory subject to the condition that those capital gains are reinvested in the acquisition of replacement assets forming part of the assets of a permanent establishment of the taxable person located within that territory, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU and Article 31 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992;

| 2) | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
#### American Shipping Co. *v.*United States

No. 6947.

Entry No. 744320.

Invoice dated London, England, February 19, 1942.

Certified February 20, 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 26, 1942.

(Decided March 3, 1947)

*Coldwater & Flynn*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 96-7720.

#### Harden *v.*North Carolina.

Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied.