alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013141EN.01001101.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě (Czech Republic) lodged on 30 January 2013 — Strojírny Prostějov, a.s. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství

(Case C-53/13)

2013/C 141/18

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Krajský soud v Ostravě

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Strojírny Prostějov, a.s.

Applicant:

Defendant: Odvolací finanční ředitelství

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Articles 56 and 57 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union preclude the application of national legislation which, where an undertaking supplying workers to another undertaking (the supplier) has its seat in the territory of another Member State, imposes on the undertaking using the workers the obligation to deduct income tax in respect of those workers and pay it into the State budget, whereas if the supplier has its seat in the territory of the Czech Republic that obligation is on the supplier?

---
# C_2014261EN.01001702.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 May 2014 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, interveners: Kingdom of Belgium and Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-9/13) (1)

1

2014/C 261/26

Language of the case: Slovenian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.

1

---
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1792 

AN ACT 

To clarify the authority of the United States Marshal Service 

to assist other Federal, State, and local law enforcement 

agencies in the investigation of cases involving sex offenders and missing children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1792 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Inves3 tigations of Sex Offenders and Missing Children Act of 

4 2011’’. 

5 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY. 

6 Section 566(e)(1)(B) of title 28, United States Code, 

7 is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(B) as directed by the Attorney General, 

9 investigate— 

10 ‘‘(i) fugitive matters, both within and 

11 outside the United States; and 

12 ‘‘(ii) at the request of another Fed13 eral, State, or local law enforcement agen14 cy, cases involving— 

15 ‘‘(I) a sex offender (as defined in 

16 section 111 of the Sex Offender Reg17 istration and Notification Act (42 

18 U.S.C. 16911)) who violates a sex of19 fender registration requirement; or 

20 ‘‘(II) a missing child.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 17, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1792 

AN ACT 

To clarify the authority of the United States Marchildren. tion of cases involving sex offenders and missing local law enforcement agencies in the investiga- shal Service to assist other Federal, State, and
NUMBER 13-19-00085-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE JOSEPH BELL

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Hinojosa

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides1

Relator Joseph Bell, proceeding pro se, filed an application for writ of mandamus 

in the above cause on February 22, 2019. 

To be entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must establish both that he has no 

adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel 

is a ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young 

v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2007). If the relator fails to meet both requirements, then the petition for writ of 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

mandamus should be denied. See id. It is the relator’s burden to properly request and 

show entitlement to mandamus relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 

1992) (orig. proceeding); In re Davidson, 153 S.W.3d 490, 491 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 

2004, orig. proceeding); see Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (“Even a pro se applicant for a writ of mandamus must 

show himself entitled to the extraordinary relief he seeks.”). In addition to other 

requirements, the relator must include a statement of facts supported by citations to 

“competent evidence included in the appendix or record,” and must also provide “a clear 

and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities 

and to the appendix or record.” See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3; see also Walker, 827 

S.W.2d at 837; In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d 659, 661 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, orig. 

proceeding). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus 

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met his burden to obtain 

mandamus relief. State ex rel. Young, 236 S.W.3d at 210. The petition fails to comply 

with the foregoing rules and we are unable to ascertain either the identity of the 

respondent in this original proceeding or the nature of the relief sought. Accordingly, the 

petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

GINA M. BENAVIDES,

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

26th day of February, 2019.
Eastern Long Island Sound Eelgrass 2006 Inventory
Palmer-West Cove/Mystic Harbor/Quiambog Cove area Sub-basins

Study Area Locus Map

5

Eelgrass Cover

| High
| | Medium New Haven
mm Low

Field Sites
e Eelgrass Found
e Eelgrass Not Found

/\/ Sub-basin Boundary

This map is a product of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s National
Wetlands Inventory Program, Region 5, and was produced for the
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection, Office of
Long Island Sound Programs.

Middlesex

nl New London

Eelgrass digital data were derived from photo interpretation of 1:20,000-

scale true color photography dated 6/16/06 with intensive field verification.
ADS 2004 TrueColor, Digital Ortho Imagery were obtained from the University
of Connecticut CES program and used as a geo-referencing baseline for
photography. Interpreted information was generated "on screen", using
USFWS 2002 eelgrass delineations as a base layer.

This map was produced with the intent that it be used or displayed at

1:20,000

a scale of 1:20,000. There are no warranties made as to the fitness of

this map for any unlisted purpose or reproduction at any other than
the original scale.

New London

GROTON

g .

Quiambog Cove

Mystic Harbor area
Palmer/West Cove area
#### MORTON v. HOODLESS.

September 12, 1835.

*Motion for judgment for to ant of an*appearance.

Judgment for want of an appearance will not be ordered where there is an affidavit of defence filed by the defendant in person, in due time for an appearance *,*but an appearance will be directed to be docketed.

THIS was a summons in a case which was duly served on the defendant, who in person, filed an affidavit of defence before the return day of the writ, but marked no appearance on the docket, nor was there an appearance by attorney.

Mr *Fallon,*for the plaintiff,

moved the court for a judgment for want of an appearance.

Tin: Court

refused the motion, and directed the defendant’s appearance *in propria persona*to be marked on (he docket by the pro-thonotary, as of the day on which the affidavit of defence was filed *nunc pro tunc.*
# C_2014409EN.01001302.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Iraklis Haralambidis v Calogero Casilli

(Case C-270/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for workers - Article 45(1) and (4) TFEU - Concept of worker - Employment in the public service - Post of President of a Port Authority - Participation in the exercise of powers of a public authority - Nationality requirement))

2014/C 409/18

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Iraklis Haralambidis

Applicant:

Defendant: Calogero Casilli

Defendant:

Intervening parties: Autorità Portuale di Brindisi, Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Regione Puglia, Provincia di Brindisi, Comune di Brindisi, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato ed Agricoltura di Brindisi

Intervening parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

In circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, Article 45(4) TFEU must be interpreted as not authorising a Member State to reserve to its nationals the exercise of the duties of President of a Port Authority.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
No. 55622.

#### Wing Chong Lung Co. *v.*United States,

protest 138935-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Distribution Future Operations Minto presented commander’s coin

By Brianne M. BenderDLA Distribution Command Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
DLA Distribution Future Operations Supply Systems Specialist, Mikie Minto received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution commanding officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 1.

Recently, Minto was on site at DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas with a dedicated small team from DLA Distribution headquarters, Human Recourses and Information Operations to do a management review of the processes for the Warehouse Management System pilot project.  

Minto worked side by side with DLA Distribution Corpus Christi deputy commander Jeremy Beckwith and his team providing Headquarters support to the distribution center.  

“Mikie has positively contributed to the successes of the WMS pilot program at DLA Distribution Corpus Christi,” said Distribution Future Operations Director Paul Abel.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLAawardDLA DistributionDistribution
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ixia Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 9, 2008
    /s/  Atul BhatnagarAtul BhatnagarPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:   May 9, 2008
    /s/  Thomas B. MillerThomas B. MillerChief Financial Officer 27
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Nextgen Biosciences Inc. - Exhibit 10.5






EXHIBIT 10.5

Infrablue Limited
27 New Bond Street
London
W1S 2RH

Azuracle Limited 
27 New Bond Street 
London W1S 2RH

26th November, 2007

Dear. Ms Khiroya,

Following our conversations and agreement to terminate the
contract dated 1st May, 2005 between Infrablue Limited and Azuracle
Limited. Please have the director of Azuracle confirm and sign the below letter
agreement.

Yours truly,

/s/ Mitchell Johnson

Mitchell Johnson
Director – Infrablue Limited

I, Gwan Taek Jung am the Director and authorized
signatory of Azuracle Limited. I confirm that as at Monday 26th
November, 2007 we have agreed to terminate the administration contract
with Infrablue Limited with immediate effect. I also confirm that all historical
debt in relation to this contract has been written off in full and that
Infrablue Limited has no outstanding liability in relation to this agreement.


	  		 
	Signed: 	/s/ Gwan Taek Jung 	 
	  	  	 
	Date: 	26th November, 2007
# C_2014462EN.01000401.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/4

---

Opinion of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 October 2014 — European Commission

(Opinion 1/13) (1)

1

((Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU - Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction - Accession of third States - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Exclusive external competence of the European Union - Risk of undermining the uniform and consistent application of EU rules and the proper functioning of the system which they establish))

(2014/C 462/05)

Language of the case: all the official languages

Applicant

Applicant

European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the Opinion

Operative part of the Opinion

The exclusive competence of the European Union encompasses the acceptance of the accession of a third State to the Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction concluded in The Hague on 25 October 1980.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.

1

---
January 22, 2016

Mr. Barry Weiss Department Chair Aviation Maintenance Technology Delaware Technical & Community College

21499 Rudder Lane Georgetown, DE 19947

Dear Mr. Weiss:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from part 147 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request, gives you some important information about how we have handled similar requests, and tells you what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your November 19, 2015, exemption request for Delaware Technical & Community College into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-6455)
, but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any more information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without telling you

further.

If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brandon Roberts Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
**EXH** **IBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Jose Araque, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            
            /s/
                Jose AraqueJose
                Araque, Chief Executive Officer




Dated:
      November 14, 2007
# C_2014395EN.01001001.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Wedding — Germany) — eco cosmetics GmbH & Co. KG v Virginie Laetitia Barbara Dupuy (C-119/13), Raiffeisenbank St. Georgen reg. Gen. mbH v Tetyana Bonchyk (C-120/13)

(Case C-119/13 and C-120/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 - European order for payment procedure - Invalid service - Effects - European order for payment declared enforceable - Opposition - Review in exceptional cases - Time-limits))

(2014/C 395/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Wedding

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: eco cosmetics GmbH & Co. KG (C-119/13), Raiffeisenbank St. Georgen reg. Gen. mbH (C-120/13)

Defendants: Virginie Laetitia Barbara Dupuy (C-119/13), Tetyana Bonchyk (C-120/13)

Operative part of the judgment

Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure must be interpreted as meaning that the procedures laid down in Articles 16 to 20 thereof are not applicable where it appears that a European order for payment has not been served in a manner consistent with the minimum standards laid down in Articles 13 to 15 of that regulation.

Where it is only after a European order for payment has been declared enforceable that such an irregularity is exposed, the defendant must have the opportunity to raise that irregularity, which, if it is duly established, will invalidate the declaration of enforceability.

---

(1)  OJ C 164, 8.6.2013.

---
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.1    
    




  








THE SHARES OF THE COMPANY ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL AND OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR
SERIES THEREOF AS SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION, AS FILED WITH THE DELAWARE SECRETARY OF STATE, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME. THE COMPANY WILL FURNISH TO ANY STOCKHOLDER UPON
REQUEST MADE TO THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY, WITHOUT CHARGE A FULL STATEMENT OF (A) THE POWERS, DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH
CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS, SO FAR AS THEY HAVE BEEN DETERMINED, AND (B) THE AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF SUBSEQUENT CLASSES OR SERIES. 





The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 



	TEN COM	—	 	as tenants in common
	

TEN ENT	

—	
 	

as tenants by entireties
	

JT TEN	

—	
 	

as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common
	

UTMA	

—	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

Custodian	
 	

 
	 	 	 	
	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	(Cust)	 	 	 	(Minor)
	

 	

 	
 	

under Uniform Transfers to Minors
	 	 	 	Act	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	(State)






Additional
abbreviations may also be used though not in above list.






For value received            hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto  



	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 	 
	
	 	 
	

  	
 	

 








(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 








	
	 	Shares





of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint  



	
	 	Attorney





to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.  



	Dated	 	 	X	 
	 	
	 	 	

	

 	

 	
 	

X	

 
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.







	SIGNATURE GUARANTEED	 	 
	
	 	 
	ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM ("STAMP"), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.
MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM ("MSP"), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM ("SEMP") AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.	 	 
	
	 	 













QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.1