alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9078)

#### F. W. Woolworth Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 1374; 2068; 2473.

(Decided on rehearing [not published] February 19, 1958)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the market values or the prices of the merchandise manufactured by Schumann & Schreider on the invoices covered by the above enumerated appeals for reappraisement, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of Germany, the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values less the amounts added under duress and that there were no higher foreign values.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to he the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise manufactured by Schumann & Schreider, and that such values were the appraised values, less the amounts added under duress.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 96-1052.

#### Tak How Investment Ltd. v. Nowak, Administrator of the Estate of Nowak, Deceased, et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2015245EN.01001501.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2015 — Plantavis and NEM v Commission and EFSA

(Case T-334/12) (1)

1

((Consumer protection - Health claims made on foods - Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 - Action for annulment - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 - Plea of illegality - Register of health claims))

(2015/C 245/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Plantavis GmbH (Berlin, Germany); and NEM, Verband mittelständischer europäischer Hersteller und Distributoren von Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln & Gesundheitsprodukten eV (Laudert, Germany) (represented by: T. Büttner, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and S. Grünheid, acting as Agents); and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (represented by: D. Detken, acting as Agent, and by R. Van der Hout and A. Köhler, lawyers)

Defendants:

Intervener in support of the defendant European Commission: European Parliament (represented by: J. Rodrigues and P. Schonard, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant European Commission:

Intervener in support of the defendants, European Commission and EFSA: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Simm and I. Šulce, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants, European Commission and EFSA:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 9), and, secondly, of Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 of 16 May 2012 establishing a list of permitted health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health (OJ 2012 L 136, p. 1), and of the Register of nutrition and health claims made on food, published on the website of the Commission.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Plantavis GmbH and NEM, Verband mittelständischer europäischer Hersteller und Distributoren von Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln & Gesundheitsprodukten eV to bear their own costs and, in addition, to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Plantavis GmbH and NEM, Verband mittelständischer europäischer Hersteller und Distributoren von Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln & Gesundheitsprodukten eV to bear their own costs and, in addition, to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA);

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Statement of Organization, Functions and Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have redelegated to the Regional 
Program Managers, Office of Child Support Enforcement, the following 
authorities vested in me by the Assistant Secretary of Administration 
for Children and Families in the memoranda dated February 16, 2007.
    (a) Authorities Delegated.
    1. The authority to approve Title IV-D State plans and amendments.
    2. Authority to certify and transmit State requests for full 
collection services by the Secretary of Treasury and State applications 
to use courts of the United States to enforce court orders.
    (b) Limitations.
    1. These redelegations shall be exercised under financial and 
administrative requirements applicable to all Administration for 
Children and Families authorities.
    2. The authority to approve Title IV-D State plans and amendments 
requires review and clearance by legal counsel and consultation with 
Central Office, Office of Child Support Enforcement, except as provided 
in written guidelines issued by the Commissioner.
    3. These authorities may not be redelegated.
    (c) Effective Date.
    This redelegation is effective on the date of signature.
    (d) Effect on Existing Delegations.
    This redelegation of authority supersedes all previous delegations 
from the Deputy Director/Commissioner, Office of Child Support 
Enforcement, on these subjects.
    I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by any Regional 
Program Manager which, in effect, involved the exercise of these 
authorities prior to the effective date of this redelegation.

    Dated: May 10, 2007.
Margot Bean,
Deputy Director/Commissioner, Office of Child Support Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7-9671 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
ASSIGNMENT FOR SECURITY

(TRADEMARKS)

WHEREAS, Frederick’s of Hollywood Group Inc. (the “Assignor”) has adopted, used and is using, and holds all right, title and interest in and to, the trademarks and service marks listed on the annexed Schedule 1A, which trademarks and service marks are registered or applied for in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “Trademarks”);

WHEREAS, the Assignor and certain affiliates have entered into a Security Agreement, dated January 28, 2008 (as amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Security Agreement”), in favor of Wells Fargo Retail Finance II, LLC, as agent for certain lenders (the “Assignee”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Security Agreement, the Assignor has assigned to the Assignee and granted to the Assignee for the benefit of the lenders a continuing security interest in all right, title and interest of the Assignor in, to and under the Trademarks, together with, among other things, the good-will of the business symbolized by the Trademarks and the applications and registrations thereof, and all proceeds thereof, including, without limitation, any and all causes of action which may exist by reason of infringement thereof and any and all damages arising from past, present and future violations thereof (the “Collateral”), to secure the payment, performance and observance of the Obligations (as defined in the Security Agreement);

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Assignor does hereby pledge, convey, sell, assign, transfer and set over unto the Assignee and grants to the Assignee for the benefit of the lenders a continuing security interest in the Collateral to secure the prompt payment, performance and for the benefit of the lenders observance of the Obligations.

The Assignor does hereby further acknowledge and affirm that the rights and remedies of the Assignee with respect to the Collateral are more fully set forth in the Security Agreement, the terms and provisions of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.

 

 

1

 








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Assignor has caused this Assignment to be duly executed by its officer thereunto duly authorized as of January 28, 2008.

 


	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        FREDERICK’S OF HOLLYWOOD GROUP INC.
 
	 	 	 
	
                          
 	
                         
 	
                        By: 
 	
                        /s/ Thomas Rende
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        Name: Thomas Rende
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
 




 

Signature Page

Assignment for Security (Trademark)
### ATM Coastal Topography-Texas, 2001: UTM Zone 15

By: Emily S. KlippAmar NayegandhiJohn Brock**A. H. SallengerJamie M. BonisteelXan YatesC. Wayne Wright

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds449

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
January
7, 2010





Bioanalytical
Systems, Inc.


2710 Kent
Avenue


West
Lafayette, Indiana 47906


Attn:
Mike Cox, VP Finance and Administration





Dear Mr.
Cox:





Incidental
to that certain Loan Agreement entered into by and between Bioanalytical
Systems, Inc. (“Borrower”) and Regions Bank (“Bank”) dated December 18, 2007
(such Loan Agreement, as amended, hereinafter referred to collectively as the
“Loan Agreement”), and subject to further conditions set forth herein, Bank
hereby waives Borrower’s compliance with the Fixed Service Coverage Ratio
covenant as set forth in Section 8(b) of the Loan Agreement for the period
ending as of December 31, 2009.





The
waiver of Borrower’s compliance with the financial covenant as set forth above
constitutes a singular waiver and shall not be deemed to be or to imply Bank’s
waiver of Borrower’s strict compliance with the terms and provisions of the Loan
Agreement.  The waiver contained herein is also subject to receipt by
Bank of such additional documentation as may be required by Bank to modify the
Loan Agreement and other related loan documents and to provide further security
for the loans from Bank to Borrower.





The
waiver granted herein shall not be deemed to create a course of conduct or
obligation upon Bank to waive Borrower’s future non-compliance with any of the
terms or provisions as set forth in the Loan Agreement.  No delay or
omission of Bank to exercise any right or power under the Loan Agreement shall
impair such right or power or be construed as a waiver of any default or as an
acquiescence except as expressly set forth herein.  All waivers of
Borrower’s noncompliance with the terms and provisions of the Loan Agreement
shall not be valid unless in writing and signed by Bank, and then only to the
extent specifically set forth in such writing.





Sincerely,REGIONS
      BANKBy:Michael
      F. Zingraf, Senior Vice
President
No. 96-8019.

#### Fashina v. United States.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 46519.

#### Protests 51265-K, etc., of Dan Brechner & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 Amendment No. 3
 Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the Fiscal Year Ended
    
    Commission File NumberNovember 30, 2009
    
    001-31643
 CCA INDUSTRIES, INC.
  DELAWARE
    
    04-2795439(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
    
    Identification No.)
 200 Murray Hill Parkway, East Rutherford, New Jersey 07073
 (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
  
 
 þ o
 o o
 þ
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer o
    
    Non-accelerated filer o(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
    
    Smaller reporting company
 þ
 o þ
  Class of Voting Stock
    
    Market Value5,514,866 shares; Common
Stock, $.01 par value
    
    $
    16,820,341




---



##### 



TABLE OF CONTENTS
 Item
    
    PageAmendment to PART II and Schedule 31.19A. Controls and Procedures
    
    
    2  4Signatures
    
    
    5Exhibit 31.1Exhibit 31.2




---



##### Table of Contents



EXPLANATORY NOTE
 OVERVIEW
  
 Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
     - 2 -




---



##### Table of Contents



Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
      - 3 -




---



##### Table of Contents



/s/ DAVID EDELLDavid Edell, Chief Executive Officer/s/ STEPHEN A. HEITStephen A. Heit, Chief Financial Officer  - 4 -




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  CCA INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
    /s/ Dunnan EdellDUNNAN EDELL, President  Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ David Edell

DAVID EDELL
    
    Chief Executive Officer,
Director
    
    June 15, 2010/s/ Ira W. Berman

IRA W. BERMAN
    
    Chairman of the Board
of Directors, Executive
Vice President, Secretary
    
    June 15, 2010/s/ Dunnan Edell

DUNNAN EDELL
    
    President, Chief Operating
Officer, Director
    
    June 15, 2010/s/ Stephen Heit

STEPHEN HEIT
    
    Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
    
    June 15, 2010/s/ Drew Edell

DREW EDELL
    
    Vice President,
Research & Development
    
    June 15, 2010/s/ Stanley Kreitman

STANLEY KREITMAN
    
    Director
    
    June 15, 2010/s/ Robert Lage

ROBERT LAGE
    
    Director
    
    June 15, 2010/s/ Jack Polak

JACK POLAK
    
    Director
    
    June 15, 2010/s/ James P. Mastrian

JAMES P. MASTRIAN
    
    Director
    
    June 15, 2010
  - 5 -
----

----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November 13, 2012 |   |   /s/ Samuel W. Fairchild                |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Samuel W. Fairchild                           |
|                                |   | President and Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|                                |   | (principal executive and financial officer)   |

----

----
(Reap. Dec. 9903)

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 15281.

(Decided January 18, 1961)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George S. Leonard,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the invoices embraced in the appeal to reqppraisement [sic] enumerated above, consisting of chenille ducks, leather baseball gloves, catchers’ mits [sic] and paper eggs and identified with a red letter “A” were appraised at the invoice unit values plus proportionate amounts of the items marked in red ink with the letter “X”.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no foreign value for such or similar merchandise to the merchandise involved herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this stipulation is limited to the merchandise described on the invoice as chenille ducks, leather baseball gloves, catchers’ mits [sic] and paper eggs and that the export value of said merchandise,'as defined in Section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 on or about the date of exportation from Japan, was the appraised unit values less the amount stated on the invoice covered by the item of buying commission of 10%.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value for the items covered by the appeal herein was the appraised unit values, less the amount stated on the invoice covered by the item of buying commission of 10 per centum.

This appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                                        3198
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                35636
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                  37665
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             76499
<PP&E>                                                      738070
<DEPRECIATION>                                              712036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              392923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        94129
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                  62148
<COMMON>                                                    215148
<OTHER-SE>                                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                392923
<SALES>                                                     158648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            240648
<CGS>                                                        35367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               823880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (568885)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (568885)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (568885)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.03)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1710 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1710

   To designate the United States courthouse located at 222 West 7th 
  Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, as the James M. Fitzgerald United States 
                              Courthouse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 13, 2011

  Mr. Begich (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the United States courthouse located at 222 West 7th 
  Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, as the James M. Fitzgerald United States 
                              Courthouse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES M. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse located at 222 West 
7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, shall be known and designated as the 
``James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 74-5789.

#### DeBenedictus *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.4
 SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 THIS
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT Agreement Company «Full_Legal_Name» Grantee «Grant_Date» day of «Grant_Date», 2005 Grant Date Plan
 WHEREAS Units
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1. Grant of Units. «Shares_Granted» «Shares_Granted» Share
 2. Transfer Restrictions Transfer
 3. Vesting and Payment of Units
 Vesting Generally Vesting Date Section 4
 Vesting Date
    
    Vested %«Vest_Date1»
    
    
    25
    %«Vest_Date2»
    
    
    25
    %«Vest_Date3»
    
    
    25
    %«Vest_Date4»
    
    
    25
    %Total
    
    
    100
    %
 Settlement of Units Section 6 Section 4
 Dividends, Splits and Voting Rights .
 66




---



##### 



Committee Section 3(b)
 4. Forfeiture
 Termination Due to Death or Disability
 Section 4(a) Code
 Termination Other than Death or Disability
 5. Grantees Representations.
 6. Tax Withholding. Withholding Liability
 7. Miscellaneous.
 No Fractional Shares
 67




---



##### 



Not an Employment Agreement
 Dispute Resolution Rules AAA
 Notices
 Amendment, Termination and Waiver
 Governing Law and Severability
 Successors and Assigns
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF , this Restricted Stock Unit Agreement is approved, granted and executed as
of the date first written above.
 SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:Name:Title:GRANTEE:«Full_Legal_Name»SignaturePrint Name
 68