alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6216.

Invoices dated Hawick, Scotland, January 30, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 4, 1942, etc.

Entry No. 740871; etc.

(Decided September 10, 1945)

*Jordan & Klingaman (Edward F. Jordan*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

The issues involved in these appeals for reappraisement of wool wearing apparel are concededly the same as those decided in *United States*v. *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.,*32 C. C. P. A. 187, C. A. D. 305, the record in which case has been incorporated herein by consent of the parties.

The incorporated case found cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (f)), to be the proper basis for appraisement, and held that the so-called British purchase tax described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act, 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48,” was not an item to be included in the “usual general expenses” contemplated within subdivision (2) of section 402 (f), *supra,*and therefore not to be calculated in determining such statutory value.

On the agreement of counsel — set forth in the stipulation of submission filed August 28, 1945 — that the several elements entering into the statutory cost of production of the items in question is equal to the appraised values thereof, less- the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, I hold such values to be the cost of production, section 402 (f), *supra,*which I find to be the proper basis for appraisement, of the instant merchandise.

The foregoing conclusion applies to all merchandise covered by the appeals under consideration, except item 1029/251 included, on the invoice with Reappraisement 151525-A and the item described as *425“Half Hose” on the invoice covered by Reappraisement 151461-A. As to the said two items, the appeals, having been abandoned, are therefore dismissed.

Judgment will-be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**STATEMENT
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Winston Johnson, Chief Executive Officer (principal Executive Officer and
      principal Financial Officer) of Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. (the
      "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2007, to which this certification accompanies (the "Annual Report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
                14, 2007
            
            /S/
                Winston JohnsonWinston
                Johnson, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer)
Description of Change in Compensation Arrangement



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 Change in Chief Executive Officer Compensation 
 As a result of Dennis R. Glass’s promotion to Chief Executive
Officer, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved: 
  

	 	•	 	 an increase in his base salary from $900,000 to $1,000,000;


  

	 	•	 	 an increase in his target award for 2007 under the annual incentive program (“AIP”) from $1,102,500 to $1,551,250 pursuant to previously disclosed
performance measures; 


  

	 	•	 	 additional long-term incentive compensation in the form of options to purchase 43,554 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $60.76 and 8,339 restricted
shares of common stock; and 


  

	 	•	 	 a special promotion award of options to purchase 174,216 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $60.76.


 All of the awards were granted under our Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan pursuant to award agreements not materially different from those previously
filed with the SEC and, subject to the terms of the award, will vest equally over three years beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. The AIP award can vary from 0 to 200% of target.
No. 96-7562.

#### Payne *v.*Alabama.

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.
No. 55649.

#### Wm. Filene’s Sons Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 141783-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CapLease, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul H. McDowell, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 /s/
      PAUL H. McDOWELLPaul
      H. McDowellChief
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      18, 2011
     A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CapLease, Inc. and will be retained by
CapLease, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20125]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-73-007]


Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

July 25, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 22, 1997, Mississippi River Transmission 
Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Third Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheet listed below to be 
effective May 1, 1997.

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 126.

    MRT states that this tariff sheet is filed to correct First Revised 
Sheet No. 126 which due to an oversight, did not include Section 8.3(a) 
on the final tariff copy. This section was included on the red-lined 
copy but was inadvertently left off the final tariff sheet which was 
filed on October 31, 1996 in compliance with Order No. 587.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20125 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [TD 9319] 
          - RIN 1545-BD52 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Correction to final regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to final regulations (TD 9319) that were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Thursday, April 5, 2007 (72 FR 16878) regarding the limitations of section 415, including updates to the regulations for numerous statutory changes since comprehensive final                               ( print page 28855)                            regulations were last published under section 415.                     

# DATES:

This correction is effective May 23, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vernon S. Carter at (202) 622-6060 or Linda S. F. Marshall at (202) 622-6090 (not toll-free numbers). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under sections 401(a), 401(a)(4), 401(a)(9), 401(k), 402, 414(s), 415, 416, 457, and 924 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, final regulations (TD 9319) contain an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification. 

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 9319), which was the subject of FR Doc. E7-5750, is corrected as follows: 

                    On page 16883, column 2, in the preamble, under the paragraph heading “                    *C. Determination of High-3 Average Compensation*                    ”, first line from the bottom of the last paragraph of that heading, the language “participant in rehired.” is corrected to read “participant is rehired.”.                 

LaNita Van Dyke, 

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).

 [FR Doc. E7-9878 Filed 5-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    DIRECT RESPONSE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Direct Response Financial Services,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ted Kozub, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by
Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  June 18, 2004



/s/ Ted Kozub
---------------
Ted Kozub
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 96-6034.

#### Vega-Fleites *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>





                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                    DIRECT RESPONSE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Direct Response Financial Services,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ted Kozub, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by
Direct Response Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  December 15, 2003



/s/ Ted Kozub
-------------
Ted Kozub
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
89–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–420 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENTS TO THE 

BILL (H.R. 3961) TO AMEND TITLE XVIII OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 

TO REFORM THE MEDICARE SGR PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR PHYSICIANS 

AND TO REINSTITUTE AND UPDATE THE PAY-AS-YOU-GO REQUIREMENT 

OF BUDGET NEUTRALITY ON NEW TAX AND MANDATORY SPENDING 

LEGISLATION, ENFORCED BY THE THREAT OF ANNUAL, AUTOMATIC SEQUESTRATION 

FEBRUARY 25, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. PERLMUTTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1109] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1109, by a non-record vote, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 

amendments to H.R. 3961, to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reform the Medicare SGR payment system for physicians and to reinstitute and update the Pay-As-You-Go requirement of budget neutrality on new tax and mandatory spending legislation, enforced by the threat of annual, automatic sequestration. 

The resolution makes in order a single motion by the Chair of the 

Committee on the Judiciary to concur in the Senate amendments. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the motion except clause 10 of rule XXI and provides that the Senate amendments shall be considered as read. Finally, the resolution 

provides one hour of debate on the motion equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the motion to concur in the Senate amendments to H.R. 3961 

(except for clause 10 of rule XXI) the Committee is not aware of 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with HEARING
2 

any points of order against the motion. The waiver of all points of 

order against the motion is prophylactic. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with HEARING
(Reap. Dec. 9075)

#### Ernest J. Newman, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. I. A. D. 472446.

(Decided February 19, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver,' Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is limited to 2,500 packets of genuine cut unset marcasites, identified on the invoice as being contained in cases PP-3 to PP-9, inclusive, exported from Switzerland and entered at the port of New York.

The case is before me on an agreed set of facts, establishing that export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and that such statutory value for the articles is $3 per packet, less 5 per centum discount, plus cost of packing, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 43268.

#### Protest 948581-G of Montgomery Ward & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the microscope sets in question are similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Wolf*(26 C. C. P. A. 243, C. A. D. 23). The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 228 (b) was therefore sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2250

   To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on forgiven 
                          mortgage loan debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 2012

Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Mr. Heller, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Brown of Ohio, 
Mr. Merkley, and Mr. Isakson) introduced the following bill; which was 
          read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on forgiven 
                          mortgage loan debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mortgage Forgiveness Tax Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF DISCHARGE OF 
              QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 108(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 
2013'' and inserting ``January 1, 2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to indebtedness discharged after December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19787]



[[Page 40340]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. EC97-44-000, ER94-1685-014, ER95-393-014, ER95-892-013, 
and ER96-2652-005]


Citizens Power LLC and Peabody Investments, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing

July 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 21, 1997, Citizens Power LLC and Peabody 
Investments, Inc., filed a second supplement to the application filed 
in the above captioned dockets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before July 31, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19787 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3593-000]


Sierra Pacific Power Company; Notice of Filing

July 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 2, 1997, Sierra Pacific Power Company 
(Sierra Pacific) filed, pursuant to Section 29.1 and 29.5 of Sierra 
Pacific's open-access transmission tariff (FERC Original Vol. No. 3), a 
proposed unexecuted Service Agreement for Network Integration 
Transmission Service to Truckee Donner Public Utility District (Truckee 
Donner). Sierra Pacific and Truckee Donner have been unable to agree on 
the terms of service to be provided. Sierra Pacific proposes an 
effective date of July 5, 1997 for this proposed unexecuted Service 
Agreement.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before July 23, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19747 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 45357.

#### Protests 39745-K, etc., of Antolini & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Kraft*v. *United States*(T. D. 47955) the protests were sustained as to the allowance for paper and foil in the dutiable weight of the cheese in question. *United States*v. *Suzarte*(8 C. C. P. A. 99, T. D. 37219) cited.
No. 45372.

#### Protest 983211-G of Haas Baruch & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the ham products in question were held dutiable at 3)1 cents per pound under paragraph 703 on the basis of the net weight of the contents of the cans less 10 percent allowance for the gelatinous material contained therein.