alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 111–130—JAN. 29, 2010 123 STAT. 3489 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3072: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

July 27, 29, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–130 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 9810 Halls 

Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Coach Jodie Bailey Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. COACH JODIE BAILEY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Coach Jodie Bailey Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Coach Jodie Bailey Post Office Building’’. 

Approved January 29, 2010. 

Jan. 29, 2010 

[H.R. 3072] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1 with PUBLIC LAWS
# C_2015213EN.01000601.xml

| 29.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 28 April 2015 — T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda v European Commission, French Republic, Council of the European Union

(Case C-456/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Action for annulment - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - Right to bring an action - Locus standi - Natural or legal persons - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Act of individual concern to the appellants - Right to effective judicial protection - Exceptional measures relating to the release of out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose on the European Union market - Marketing year 2010/2011))

(2015/C 213/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: T & L Sugars Ltd, Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda (represented by: D. Waelbroeck, avocat, and D. Slater, Solicitor)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Ondrůšek and P. Rossi, acting as Agents), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, D. Colas and C. Candat, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: É. Sitbon and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders T & L Sugars Ltd and Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders T & L Sugars Ltd and Sidul Açúcares, Unipessoal Lda to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.

1

---
Case Wo. 9,374.

#### MEADE v. ROBERTS.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 72.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1802.

Practice — Calling Docket — Offer to Appear— Affi da vit — Bail.

Upon calling the appearance docket, if the defendant offers to appear, the court will not give the plaintiff’s attorney time to procure an affidavit to hold the defendant to special bail.

Motion to appear without special bail, there being no cause of action filed.

Mr. Woodward, for plaintiff,

produced an account, but no affidavit. THE COURT decided it to be insufficient to hold to bail.

Mr. Woodward requested time to get an affidavit.

THE COURT

were of opinion that the defendant had a right now to appear, and they could not amerce the marshal when an appearance was offered, unless there appeared to be a good cause of action.

MARSHALL, Circuit Justice, absent.
No. 96-5362.

#### Wilson *v.*Pennsylvania.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 40491.

#### Protests 794067-G(D), etc., of Green Forest Wine & Spirits Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The protests were submitted without the introduction of evidence. On the record presented the protests were overruled.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 210 

To amend title 44, United States Code, to eliminate the mandatory printing 

of bills and resolutions for the use of offices of Members of Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Mr. COBURN (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend title 44, United States Code, to eliminate the 

mandatory printing of bills and resolutions for the use 

of offices of Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop the OverPrinting 

5 (STOP) Act of 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 210 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MANDATORY PRINTING OF BILLS 

2 AND RESOLUTIONS FOR USE OF OFFICES OF 

3 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

4 (a) ELIMINATION OF MANDATORY PRINTING.— 

5 Chapter 7 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by 

6 inserting after section 706 the following: 

7 ‘‘§ 706A. Prohibiting printing of bills and resolutions 

8 for use of offices of Members of Congress 

9 ‘‘(a) NO PRINTING PERMITTED.—The Public Printer 

10 shall make bills and resolutions available for the use of 

11 offices of Members of Congress only in an electronic for12 mat which is accessible through the Internet. 

13 ‘‘(b) MEMBER OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this sec14 tion, a ‘Member of Congress’ means a Senator or a Rep15 resentative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, 

16 the Congress.’’. 

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 706 of 

18 such title is amended— 

19 (1) by striking ‘‘There shall be printed’’ each 

20 place it appears and inserting ‘‘Subject to section 

21 706A, there shall be printed’’; and 

22 (2) by striking ‘‘Of concurrent and simple reso23 lutions’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to section 706A, of 

24 concurrent and simple resolutions’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 210 IS

1 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 of chapter 7 of such title is amended by inserting after 

3 the item relating to section 706 the following: 

‘‘706A. Prohibiting printing of bills and resolutions for use of offices of Members of Congress.’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

6 upon the expiration of the 3-month period which begins 

7 on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Amendment to Employment Agreement of Carl Mielke



 Exhibit 10.107 
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 OF CARL MIELKE 
 WHEREAS, Charles & Colvard, Ltd., a North Carolina company with its principal office at 300 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite A, Morrisville, North
Carolina 27506 (the “Company”), and Carl Mielke (“Employee”) previously entered into an employment agreement (the “Agreement”) effective as of March 19, 2007; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 15 of the Agreement provides that it may be amended by an agreement in writing signed by each of the parties; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement to comply with changes necessitated by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree that the Agreement shall be amended, effective as of the date last executed below, as
follows: 
 1. The second sentence of Section 7(c), Termination by the Company Without Cause., shall be deleted and the following
sentence shall be inserted in its place: 
 “In the event the Company terminates Employee pursuant to this Subsection (c), the Employee
will continue to receive Base Salary at time of termination for a one (1) year period from such termination (the “Termination Compensation”). 
 2. The first thirty-four words of Section 7(e), Change of Control Situations., shall be deleted and the following thirty-four words shall be inserted in their place: 
 “In the event of a Change of Control of the Company at any time after the date hereof, Employee may voluntarily terminate employment with Company up
until one (1) year after the Change of Control” 
 3. The definition of “Good Reason” provided in Section 7(e),
Change of Control Situations., shall be deleted and the following inserted in its place: 
 “‘Good Reason’” shall
mean the occurrence of any of the following events without the Employee’s express written consent: 
  

	 	(i)	the assignment to the Employee of duties materially inconsistent with the position and status of the Employee with the Company immediately prior to the Change of Control;


  

	 	(ii)	 a material reduction by the Company in the Employee’s pay grade or base salary as then in effect, or the exclusion of Employee from 











	 	 
participation in Company’s benefit plans in which he previously participated as in effect at the date hereof or as the same may be increased from time
to time during the Term; 


  

	 	(iii)	an involuntary relocation of the Employee more than 50 miles from the location where the Employee worked immediately prior to the Change in Control or the breach by the Company of
any material provision of this Agreement; or 

  

	 	(iv)	any purported termination of the employment of Employee by Company which is not effected in accordance with this Agreement. 

  

					
	 	 	CHARLES & COLVARD, LTD.
			
	Dated: August 28, 2007	 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert S. Thomas

		 	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer & Chairman
		
	Dated: August 28, 2007	 	 /s/ Carl Mielke

		 	Carl Mielke
Michigan Supreme

Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 14, 2015 

# Order

April 14, 2015

150929 & ( 11 )

THOMAS A. COLE

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

,

v

LAURIE A. COLE

, Defendant

- Appell ee

. SC: 150929

COA: 324947

Kalamazoo CC: 2008

- 007483

- DO

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss the application for leave to

appeal is GRANTED. The dismissal is with prejudice and without costs to either party.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Data, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June, 30 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Art
Malone, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Art
Malone, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Art Malone, Jr.,
--------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer
September 3, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1687 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1687

   To adjust the boundary of the Carson National Forest, New Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 12, 2011

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Udall of New Mexico) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To adjust the boundary of the Carson National Forest, New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Carson National Forest Boundary 
Adjustment Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. CARSON NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--The boundary of the Carson National Forest in the 
State of New Mexico is adjusted to incorporate the approximately 4,990 
acres of land generally depicted as ``Miranda Canyon Boundary'' on the 
map entitled ``Carson National Forest Boundary Adjustment'' and dated 
September 21, 2010.
    (b) Land and Water Conservation Fund.--For purposes of section 7 of 
the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 4601-9), 
the boundaries of the Carson National Forest, as modified under 
subsection (a), shall be considered to be the boundaries of the Carson 
National Forest as in existence on January 1, 1965.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the amended  Annual  Report of ATC  Healthcare,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending  February 28, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Daniel
Pess, Senior Vice President - Finance,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2) The  information  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of  operations  of the
        Company.

/S/ DANIEL PESS
---------------
Daniel Pess
Senior Vice President - Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

May 25, 2007
No. 45316.

#### Protests 30820-K, etc., of General Dyestuff Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the commodity in question was held not subject to the tax imposed.
No. 96-5654.

#### Roach *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-2875-000]


Penobscot Bay Energy Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance of Order

July 28, 1997.
    Penobscot Bay Energy Company, L.L.C. (PBEC) submitted for filing a 
rate schedule under which PBEC will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions as a marketer. PBEC also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, PBEC requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by PBEC.
    On July 21, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by PBEC should file a motion to intervene 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, PBEC is authorized 
to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a 
guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of 
another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of PBEC's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions, to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is August 20, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE. Washington, DC 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20147 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 55636.

#### J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6784-R (Chicago).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial petitioner’s witness testified that the appraiser advanced the value of the merchandise by *33%*percent; that when the first two or three shipments of this type of merchandise arrived, entry was made at the list price, less *33%*percent; that the examiner had no information as to the home market value or the discount and asked the witness to get information from the shipper; that after conferences between representatives of the shipper and customs officials, it was agreed that appraisement of the invoices would be withheld until a test case was decided; that thereafter the witness received a notice that the appraiser had advanced the value of the involved entry by *33%*percent; and that subsequently all the other entries were amended by adding back the *33%*percent, but the involved entry was not amended because it had been appraised. On the record presented it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
#### Italo American Accordion Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 8128.

Entry No. 7325, etc.

(Decided June 12, 1952)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> That the merchandise covered by appeals to reappraisement set forth in Schedule A, hereto annexed and made a part of this stipulation, consists of certain accordions, accordion reeds and concertina reeds exported from Italy.

> That on or about the dates of exportation of such merchandise, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of Italy in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States at the entered values, less the amount added under duress.

> That on or about the dates of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Italy or, if so offered, the price for home consumption was no higher.

> That the appeals to reappraisement set forth in the attached schedule be sub-hiitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the entered values, less the amount added under duress.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
                Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Alamosa Holdings,
                Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
                with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
                I, David Sharbutt, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
                certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The
                         Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The
                         information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                         the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David
                                SharbuttName:Title:Date:
                         
                         David Sharbutt Chairman and Chief
                                Executive Officer May 15, 2003


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
                Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
                Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
                Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
                been provided to Alamosa Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Alamosa
                Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
                staff upon request.