alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             620
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,039
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,425
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             524
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               469
<LOANS>                                         42,856
<ALLOWANCE>                                        183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,580
<DEPOSITS>                                      36,602
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,002
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  53,580
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,979
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  493
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,472
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,699
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,935
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,537
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    605
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         370
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            9
<NET-INCOME>                                       379
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.18
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   197
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       14
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  183
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               183
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2133 

To reauthorize the America’s Agricultural Heritage Partnership in the State 

of Iowa. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2012 

Mr. HARKIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the America’s Agricultural Heritage 

Partnership in the State of Iowa. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘America’s Agricultural 

5 Heritage Partnership Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE AMERICA’S AGRICUL7 TURAL HERITAGE PARTNERSHIP. 

8 Section 707 of division II of the Omnibus Parks and 

9 Public Lands Management Act of 1996 (16 U.S.C. 461 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2133 IS

1 note; Public Law 104–333) is amended by striking ‘‘Sep2 tember 30, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2022’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(Reap. Dec. 9700)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 3790, etc.

(Decided May 10, 1960)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> *709IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between, tbe respective parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that tbe export value ou or about tbe dates of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by tbe Minami Sangyo Co. Ltd. invoices embraced by tbe Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated above at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade fox-export to the United States including cost of containers and covei-ings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United Sta/tes was, as definited [sic] in Section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, the f.o.b. invoice prices exclusive of buying commission as stated on the invoices herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Re-appraisement enumerated above are limited to Minami Sangyo Co. Ltd. invoices and abandoned in all other respects.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof,

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved merchandise, and that such values were the f.o.b. invoice prices, exclusive of buying commission, as stated on the invoices involved herein.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent, the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9907)

#### Gore-Temple Div. E. A. Shaw & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 8171.

(Decided January 25, 1961)

Plaintiffs not represented by counsel.

*George 8. Leonard,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*578OlivbR, Chief Judge:

.Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reappraisement consists of tangled, bright lustre viscose waste from Switzerland, having a total net weight of 10,118 pounds and contained in bales numbered 6765 to 6792 inclusive.

> That on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise hereinbefore described, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Switzerland, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, at a unit value of $.085 per pound, net, packed, less the proportion of nondutiable charges; and that there was no higher foreign value.

> That the above appeal for reappraisement is limited to the merchandise hereinbefore described and is abandoned as to all other merchandise; and that said appeal may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the tangled, bright-lustre, viscose waste contained in bales 6765 to 6792, inclusive, and having a total net weight of 10,118 pounds, included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value for the merchandise is $0,085 per pound, net, packed, less the proportion of nondutiable charges.

As to all other merchandise covered by the entry in question, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Filed 3/20/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2008 ND 43

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Vonnie Darin Darby, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20070092

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kara Schmitz Olson, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.

David N. Ogren, Grand Forks Public Defender Office, 405 Bruce Ave., Ste. 101, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Darby

No. 20070092

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Vonnie Darby appealed a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of burglary and simple assault.  Darby argued the trial court erred in not instructing the jury that a detective’s testimony exceeded his ability to testify when the State asked whether he had any doubt in his mind that Darby committed the crime and he answered no.  Darby also argued the district court erred as a matter of law in ruling the law library at the Cass County Jail was adequate.  Finally, Darby argued the district court erred in sentencing him to multiple punishments for the same offense.  We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a) (4) and (7).  See State v. Voigt, 2007 ND 100, ¶ 8, 734 N.W.2d 787 (establishing that a defendant must raise double jeopardy issue before or during trial).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring
No. 47748.

#### Protests 831640-G, etc., of Renken & Yates Smith Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of celery sandwiches,- piquant sandwiches, and harlequin cocktail sticks the same as those the Subject of *Renken*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 309, C. D. 73). The claim at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ENACTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Third Wave Technologies, Inc. (the "Company) Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin Conroy, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Maneesh Arora, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C Section 1350, that on the date of this certification:

     (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

     (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Kevin T. Conroy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Kevin T. Conroy
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        November 8, 2006


                                        /s/ Maneesh K. Arora
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Maneesh K. Arora
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        November 8, 2006
No. 96-1199.

#### Muller, a Minor Child, by His Parents and Next Friends, Muller et al. *v.*Jefferson Lighthouse School et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 189 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 189

To require the Secretary of Defense, in awarding a contract for the KC-
X Aerial Refueling Aircraft Program, to consider any unfair competitive 
                 advantage that an offeror may possess.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2011

  Mr. Moran (for himself, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Roberts, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
 Blunt, Mrs. McCaskill, and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Defense, in awarding a contract for the KC-
X Aerial Refueling Aircraft Program, to consider any unfair competitive 
                 advantage that an offeror may possess.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense Level Playing Field Act''.

SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF UNFAIR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN EVALUATION OF 
              OFFERS FOR KC-X AERIAL REFUELING AIRCRAFT PROGRAM.

    (a) Requirement To Consider Unfair Competitive Advantage.--In 
awarding a contract for the KC-X aerial refueling aircraft program (or 
any successor to that program), the Secretary of Defense shall, in 
evaluating any offers submitted to the Department of Defense in 
response to a solicitation for offers for such program, consider any 
unfair competitive advantage that an offeror may possess.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 60 days after submission of offers in 
response to any such solicitation, the Secretary of Defense shall 
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on any unfair 
competitive advantage that any offeror may possess.
    (c) Requirement To Take Findings Into Account in Award of 
Contract.--In awarding a contract for the KC-X aerial refueling 
aircraft program (or any successor to that program), the Secretary of 
Defense shall take into account the findings of the report submitted 
under subsection (b).
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``congressional defense committees'' has the 
        meaning given such term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, 
        United States Code.
            (2) The term ``unfair competitive advantage'', with respect 
        to an offer for a contract, means a situation in which the cost 
        of development, production, or manufacturing is not fully borne 
        by the offeror for such contract.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Nobel Education Dynamics, Inc. (formerly the Rocking Horse Child Care Centers of
America, Inc.) and subsidiaries on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-3793, 333-3797 and
33-73496) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-21859, 33-44888 and 33-64701) of our report
dated February 10, 1997, except for Note 16, as to which the date is March 20,
1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements for Nobel Education
Dynamics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the
years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 28, 1997
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act),
I, Robert W. Harvey, President of Orion Power Holdings, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (a) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                     
|-------------------- |  | --------------------
|Date: August 5, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert W. Harvey
|                     |  | Robert W. Harvey    
|                     |  | President
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# October New Employee Orientation

By Julia JenningsDLA Land and Maritime, People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The October New Employee Orientation was held Oct. 30-31 in Building 20.  The session was attended by 30 new associates making it one of the largest groups to attend NEO. The large number was, in part, a result of the number of college interns who attended. 

Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Director of Operations Griff Warren opened the two-day orientation by welcoming all of the new employees. 

Representatives from several DLA Land and Maritime departments such as the Equal Employment Office, DLA Installation Support, Human Resources, Office of Counsel and DLA Intelligence including new participant, Safety and Health Office, gave presentations to explain their missions and insight into the different services available to employees. 

Please welcome these new employees as they begin their DLA careers!

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Building Connections L&MCulture L&MDLA L&Mnew employee L&MResource the Enterprise L&MPACER/Intern L&M
II 

Calendar No. 205 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1726 

To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments made to vendors 

by government entities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2011 

Mr. MCCONNELL introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

OCTOBER 18, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain payments 

made to vendors by government entities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Withholding Tax Relief 

5 Act of 2011’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1726 PCS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF IMPOSITION OF WITHHOLDING ON CER2 TAIN PAYMENTS MADE TO VENDORS BY GOV3 ERNMENT ENTITIES. 

4 The amendment made by section 511 of the Tax In5 crease Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 is re6 pealed and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 

7 applied as if such amendment had never been enacted. 

8 SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF UNSPENT FEDERAL FUNDS TO OFF9 SET LOSS IN REVENUES. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi11 sion of law, of all available unobligated funds, 

12 $30,000,000,000 in appropriated discretionary funds are 

13 hereby permanently rescinded. 

14 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Director of the Office of 

15 Management and Budget shall determine and identify 

16 from which appropriation accounts the rescission under 

17 subsection (a) shall apply and the amount of such rescis18 sion that shall apply to each such account. Not later than 

19 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

20 Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 

21 submit a report to the Secretary of the Treasury and Con22 gress of the accounts and amounts determined and identi23 fied for rescission under the preceding sentence. 

24 (c) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply to the 

25 unobligated funds of the Department of Defense or the 

26 Department of Veterans Affairs. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 205 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1726 

A BILL 

payments made to vendors by government entities. 

To repeal the imposition of withholding on certain 

OCTOBER 18, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Before the Third Division,

June 13, 1950

No. 54401.

#### Wm. Faehndrich, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 123245-K/12825 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Edam process-cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Dutch Cheese Importers Co.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1197), tjie claim of the plaintiff was sustained.