alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mario Drolet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report of Millennium Capital Venture Holdings, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

- designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others within the registrant, particularly during the period in which the amended quarterly report is being prepared;

- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

- presented in this amended quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation of the Evaluation Date.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:

- all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

- Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. I have indicated in this amended quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: December 19, 2003 | By: /s/ Mario DroletName: Mario DroletTitle: 	President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### United States *v.*M. E. Dey & Co., Inc.

No. 8090.

Entry No. 583.

(Decided February 18, 1952)

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *{Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Eoed, Judge:

When this case was called for hearing, it was agreed between the parties that the correct dutiable value of the involved merchandise was $2.81 per square foot, less the consular fee, plus *4%*per centum tax, packed, and upon this stipulation the appeal was submitted.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise to be $2.81 per square foot, less consular fee, plus 4K per centum tax, packed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 48922.

#### Protests 98354-K, etc., of John V. Carr & Son, Inc. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the items consist of salted codfish similar in all material respects to that passed upon in Abstract 48574. That record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 1)4 cents per pound under paragraph 719 (3) and T. D. 49752 was sustained.
# C_2014194EN.01002301.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2014 — Pyrox v OHIM — Köb Holzheizsysteme (PYROX)

(Case T-575/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark PYROX - Earlier national word marks PYROT - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 194/29

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pyrox GmbH (Oberhausen, Germany) (represented by: T. Eigen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and G. Schneider, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Köb Holzheizsysteme GmbH (Wolfurt, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 October 2012 (Joined Cases R 2187/2011-1 and R 2507/2011-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Köb Holzheizsysteme GmbH and Pyrox GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pyrox GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pyrox GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 222 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 22
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 222

 To limit investor and homeowner losses in foreclosures, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 2011

Mr. Whitehouse (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. Leahy) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                             March 31, 2011

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit investor and homeowner losses in foreclosures, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Limiting Investor and Homeowner Loss 
in Foreclosure Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. LOSS MITIGATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 105 of title 11, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Without limiting the court's authority under subsection (d) 
or under any other statute or rule, the court, by local rule or order, 
may establish and maintain a loss mitigation program for the 
consideration and negotiation of consensual alternatives to avoid 
foreclosure between an individual debtor and the holder of a claim 
secured by a security interest in real property that is the debtor's 
principal residence.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 362(e) of title 11, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) If the party in interest requesting relief from the stay 
under subsection (d) of this section participates in a loss mitigation 
program maintained pursuant to section 105(e) of this title, the time 
periods specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection shall be 
tolled during the time period commencing on the date on which such 
participation began and ending on the date on which notice of such 
termination is filed and served on the debtor.''.
                                                        Calendar No. 22

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 222

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To limit investor and homeowner losses in foreclosures, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 31, 2011

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Alba L. ROMERO-SAAVEDRA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-3449.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 28, 1999.

Alba L. Romero-Saavedra, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Lara J. Edelstein, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was arrested and ultimately charged by the state with trafficking in illegal drugs. At the time of her arrest, she was in possession of $1,462 in currency which was seized as the evidence by law enforcement officials. The appellant pled guilty to the charge on January 9, 1997. On August 13, 1997, eight months after the conclusion of the criminal proceeding, the appellant filed her petition for the return of her currency. The trial court’s denial of this petition prompted this appeal.

We affirm the lower court’s denial of the petition because it was untimely filed pursuant to section 705.105(1), Florida Stat*1291utes (1997). That statute specifically provides that:

> Title to unclaimed evidence or unclaimed tangible personal property lawfully seized pursuant to a lawful investigation in the custody of the court or clerk of the court from a criminal proceeding or seized as evidence by and in the custody of a law enforcement agency shall vest permanently in the law enforcement agency 60 days after the conclusion of the proceeding.

Thus, where the appellant failed to file her petition within sixty days after the conclusion of the criminal proceeding, title to the currency properly vested with the law enforcement agency.

Affirmed.
No. 55631.

#### Davies Turner & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 131411-K/1119, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 147 (Thursday, July 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 41079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that on July 21, 1997, a proposed Consent Decree in United 
States v. New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc., Civil No. 97-357 JD 
(D.N.H.), was lodged with the United States District Court for the 
District of New Hampshire. The proposed Consent Decree concerns the 
response to the existence of hazardous substances at the South 
Municipal Water Supply Well Superfund Site (``Site'') located in 
Peterborough, New Hampshire pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
    Under the terms of the Consent Decree, New Hampshire Ball Bearings, 
Inc. (``NHBB''), the owner and operator of a portion of the Site, will 
reimburse the United States $1,125,000, plus interest, for costs 
incurred and to be incurred in connection with the Site. In addition, 
NHBB will pay $93,000 for natural resource damages for resources under 
the trusteeship of the United States Department of the Interior. NHBB 
has been performing the remedial action for the Site pursuant to a 
Unilateral Administrative Order.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, 
D.C. 20044, and should refer to United States v. New Hampshire Ball 
Bearings, Inc. (D.N.H.), D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-551A.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, 55 Pleasant St., Rm. 312, Concord, New 
Hampshire, and the Region 1 Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, One Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts. Copies of the 
Consent Decree also may be examined at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy 
of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by mail 
from the Consent Decree Library. In requesting a copy, please refer to 
the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $11.50 (46 
pages at 25 cents per page reproduction cost) made payable to Consent 
Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Division.
[FR Doc. 97-20207 Filed 7-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-10-0486

SAT Date: 8/17/2010

Print Date: 8/31/2011

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: No Comment

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,S,MM,L

LUNG

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-10-0486-87

FATE: MW = 646 with 14.8% < 500 and 93% < 1000

Solid 

S = Disp.

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 25-90; OECD 301F(Mano Resp): 18.87-4.40%/28d;OECD302A(Porous 

 Pot): 41% removal; OECD301F(Mano Resp):42.4-64.2%/28D; 

 OECD301B(ModSturm CO2 ev): 86.1-96.1%OECD301A(Ready 

 Biodeg): 10.9-54.5%/28d.

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = low - moderate

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI 

tract, and good from the lung, based on analogs. There are concerns for surfactant effects on the 

lung, and for irritation to the eye, skin (chronic), mucous membranes and lung, based on 

surfactant properties of the compound.

 Ecotox:

Test 

Organism

Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 2.6

daphnid 48-h LC50 1.8

green algal 96-h EC50 <6.8

fish _ chronic value 0.40 ACR 6.5

daphnid _ chronic value 0.28 ACR 6.5

algal _ chronic value <1.7 ACR 4

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predicted based on SARs for anionic surfactants; Ecotox 

chemical class: surfactant-anionic-C15-SO4; MW 646 with 93% < 1000 and 14.8% < 500; solid 

with mp = unknown; S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; hardness <150.0 mg/L as 

CaCO3; ECs based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

28

SARs anionic surfactant

SAR Class surfactant-anionic-C15-SO4

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
# C_2015279EN.01000801.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 June 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy)) — Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Others v Rina Services SpA, Rina SpA, SOA Rina Organismo di Attestazione SpA

(Case C-593/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 TFEU, 51 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Connection with the exercise of official authority - Directive 2006/123/EC - Article 14 - Bodies responsible for verifying and certifying that undertakings carrying out public works comply with the conditions laid down by law - National legislation providing that the registered office of such bodies must be situated in Italy))

(2015/C 279/09)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Consiglio di Stato, Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici, Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti Pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture, Conferenza Unificata Stato Regioni, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Ministero per le Politiche europee, Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Ministero degli Affari esteri

Defendants: Rina Services SpA, Rina SpA, SOA Rina Organismo di Attestazione SpA

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The first paragraph of Article 51 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the exception to the right of establishment laid down in that provision does not apply to the certification activities carried out by companies classified as certification bodies. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The first paragraph of Article 51 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the exception to the right of establishment laid down in that provision does not apply to the certification activities carried out by companies classified as certification bodies.

| 2. | Article 14 of Directive 2006/123 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides that companies classified as certification bodies must have their registered office in national territory. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 14 of Directive 2006/123 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides that companies classified as certification bodies must have their registered office in national territory.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.

---
Exhibit
      99.2


FOR
                IMMEDIATE RELEASE
            FOR
                FURTHER INFORMATIONJanuary
                25, 2006
            Brendan
                J. McGillSenior
                Vice President and CFO215.256.8828





SUMMARY:
      Chief Executive Officer announces retirement date





Harleysville,
      PA., January 25, 2006 - Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:HARL)
      reported today that Edward J. Molnar, chairman and chief executive officer
      of
      the Company and Harleysville Savings Bank announced that he will retire on
      January 24, 2007. Also today, the Company’s board of directors named Ronald B.
      Geib, currently the Company’s president and chief operating officer, to succeed
      Molnar as chief executive officer effective January 24, 2007. After he retires,
      Molnar will continue to serve as chairman and as a member of the board of
      directors.





Molnar
      joined Harleysville as its chief executive officer in 1967 and was named
      President in 1975. At retirement, Molnar’s career with the company will have
      spanned 40 years. During Molnar’s tenure as CEO, the Company’s assets have grown
      from $3 million in 1967 to more than $760 million today.





Molnar
      has also contributed to the banking industry throughout his career, serving
      four
      terms on the board of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh. He also served
      as Vice Chairman of the board of directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
      Pittsburgh in 1987. In 1993, Molnar served on the Stockholder Study Committee,
      a
      24 member committee of bankers from throughout the United States, which was
      mandated by Congress to study the Federal Home Loan Bank System.





During
      1997 and 1998, Molnar served as a member of the Thrift Advisory Council. As
      a
      member of the TIAC Council, Molnar was one of 12 bankers from throughout the
      United States to meet with Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve board of
      governors to provide information and opinions on financial services and the
      economy.





Molnar
      served as Chairman of the Pennsylvania Association of Community Bankers in
      1994-1995, Chairman of the Insured Financial Institutions of the Delaware Valley
      1981-1982, and as a director of America’s Community Bankers from 1997 to 2003.





“One
      of
      the greatest qualities of a leader is to build a strong management team”, said
      Molnar. “Ron Geib is someone that I have worked with for the past 30 years and
      trust completely and I know that the company will be in excellent hands with
      him
      at the helm. Ron had served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer for many
      years and most recently as our President and Chief Operating Officer. He brings
      many years of experience to the job and understands the core values that have
      made us successful for so many years. He is a man of high integrity and I know
      that he along with our many talented employees will lead this Company to new
      heights.”
Before the Second Division,

October 16, 1943

No. 48887.

#### Protests 65750-K, etc., of Jordan Marsh Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were therefore dismissed.
#### Trinacria Importing Co. *v.*United States

No. 6608.

Entry No. 838934.

Invoice dated Deerlick, Belgium, April 13, 1939.

Certified April 14, 1939.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 1, 1939.

(Decided December 12, 1946)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise and issues in the above appeal, is the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues cited in *United Slates*v. *Stephen Rug Mills,*Reap. Dec. No. 6283 and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers- *477and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States is the value as invoiced. '

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is the value as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.