28954 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 23, 2007 / Notices 

Department would issue its final 

determinations no later than 75 days 

after the date on which the Department 

issued its preliminary determinations. 

Section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 

CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii) provide that a final 

determination may be postponed until 

no later than 135 days after the date of 

the publication of the preliminary 

determination if, in the event of an 

affirmative preliminary determination, a 

request for such postponement is made 

by exporters who account for a 

significant proportion of exports of the 

subject merchandise. Additionally, 19 

CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires that requests 

by a respondent for postponement of a 

final determination be accompanied by 

a request for an extension of the 

provisional measures from a four–

month period to not more than six 

months. 

On April 25, 2007, in accordance with 

section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii) and (e)(2), 

Citrusvil, S.A. and S.A. San Miguel 

A.G.I.C.y F. (the two respondents in the 

investigation of lemon juice from 

Argentina) requested that the 

Department: (1) postpone the final 

determination in the Argentina 

investigation, and (2) extend the 

provisional measures period in the 

Argentina investigation from four 

months to a period not longer than six 

months. These two companies account 

for a significant proportion of exports of 

subject merchandise from Argentina. In 

addition, on April 26, 2007, The Coca–

Cola Company and a subsidiary, The 

Coca–Cola Export Corporation, Mexico 

Branch (respondent in the investigation 

of lemon juice from Mexico), also 

requested that the Department: (1) 

postpone the final determination in the 

Mexico investigation, and (2) extend the 

provisional measures period in the 

Mexico investigation from four months 

to a period not longer than six months. 

This company accounts for a significant 

proportion of exports of subject 

merchandise from Mexico. 

Accordingly, pursuant to section 

735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.210(b)(2)(ii), the Department is 

postponing the final determinations 

until no later than 135 days after the 

publication of the preliminary 

determinations in the Federal Register 

for the following reasons: (1) the 

preliminary determinations in these 

investigations were affirmative; (2) the 

requesting producers/exporters account 

for a significant proportion of exports of 

the subject merchandise in these 

investigations and they requested the 

extension of provisional measures; and 

(3) no compelling reasons for denial 

exist. The new statutory deadline for the 

final determinations is September 8, 

2007. Because September 8, 2007, is a 

Saturday, the Department will issue the 

final determinations no later than 

September 10, 2007. Provisional 

measures will be extended in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) 

and section 733(d) of the Act. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to sections 777(i) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.210(g). 

Dated: May 17, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9926 Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Department of Commerce, National 

Institute of Standards and Technology, 

et al. 

Notice of Consolidated Decision on 

Applications for Duty–Free Entry of 

Electron Microscopes 

This is a decision consolidated 

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 

Related records can be viewed between 

8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 2104, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue., NW, Washington, 

D.C. 

Docket Number: 07–014. Applicant: 

U.S. Department of Commerce, National 

Institute of Standards and Technology, 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope, Model Quanta 

Series. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The 

Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 

72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. Order date: 

September 16, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–015. Applicant: 

VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 

Seattle, WA 98108. Instrument: Electron 

Microscope, Model JEM -1011. 

Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. 

Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 

20504, April 25, 2007. Order Date: 

September 13, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–018. Applicant: 

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State 

University, Institute for Critical 

Technology and Applied Science, 

Blacksburg, VA 24061. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope, Model Quanta 600 

FEG. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Brno, 

Czech Republic. Intended Use: See 

notice at 72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. 

Order Date: December 13, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–019. Applicant: 

University of Utah, Department of 

Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, John 

A. Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, UT 

84132. Instrument: Electron Microscope, 

Model JEM -1400. Manufacturer: JEOL 

Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 

72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. Order 

Date: November 15, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–020. Applicant: 

University of Rhode Island, Department 

of Chemical Engineering, Kingston, RI 

02881. Instrument: Electron Microscope, 

Model JEM - 2100. Manufacturer: JEOL, 

Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 

72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. Order 

Date: September 21, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–021. Applicant: 

The University of Texas at Austin, 

Purchasing Office, Austin, TX 78722. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model 

JEM -1400. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., 

Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 

20504, April 25, 2007. Order Date: 

December 4, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–022. Applicant: 

Duke University, Durham, NC 27708–

0271. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, The 

Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 

72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. Order 

Date: December 21, 2006. 

Comments: None received. Decision: 

Approved. No instrument of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instrument, for such purposes as these 

instruments are intended to be used, 

was being manufactured in the United 

States at the time the instruments were 

ordered. Reasons: Each foreign 

instrument is an electron microscope 

and is intended for research or scientific 

educational uses requiring an electron 

microscope. We know of no electron 

microscope, or any other instrument 

suited to these purposes, which was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of order of each instrument. 

Faye Robinson, 

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. E7–9927 Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Purdue University, et al., Notice of 

Consolidated Decision on 

Applications, for Duty–Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

This is a decision consolidated 

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 23, 2007 / Notices 28955 

L. 89–651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 

301). Related records can be viewed 

between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 

2104, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

14th and Penn. Ave., NW, Washington, 

DC. 

Comments: None received. Decision: 

Approved. We know of no instrument of 

equivalent scientific value to the foreign 

instruments described below, for such 

purposes as each is intended to be used, 

which was being manufactured in the 

United States at the time of its order. 

Docket Number: 06–054. Applicant: 

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. 

Instrument: DBF Fiber Laser System. 

Manufacturer: Koheras A/S, Denmark. 

Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 

20505, April 25, 2007. Reasons: The 

foreign instrument provides a means to 

describe and formulate the physical 

description of the fundamental noise 

properties of optical frequency combs 

and their application to Optical 

Arbitrary Waveform Generation. An 

ultra–narrow (1.0 kHz optical linewidth) 

CW laser is used to sweep the carrier 

frequency and beat it with a 

conventional mode–locked laser based 

optical frequency comb. The CW laser 

also provides a 60 pm fast piezo tuning 

range and 700 pm thermal tuning with 

100 mW output power. 

Docket Number: 06–059. Applicant: 

Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. 

Instrument: Micro–dissecting 

Microscope. Manufacturer: Singer 

Instruments, UK. Intended Use: See 

notice at 72 FR 20505, April 25, 2007. 

Reasons: The foreign instrument 

provides capability to identify and 

categorize genes that control DNA 

replication and repair using a simple 

model organism known as baker’s yeast. 

It is a unique motorized 

micromanipulator specifically designed 

to separate single aspo–spores of yeast. 

It provides automatic micro–dissection 

and can ‘‘memorize’’ the locations of 

each ascus so that it can shuttle between 

positions automatically. 

Docket Number: 06–067. Applicant: 

The University of Illinois, Champaign, 

IL. Instrument: Ti: Sapphire Lasers (2), 

Model TIS SF–077s. Manufacturer: 

Tekhnoscan, Russia. Intended Use: See 

notice at 72 FR 20505, April 25, 2007. 

Reasons: The foreign instrument 

provides a means of studying the 

application of ultra–cold atom gases to 

quantum simulation. The lasers will be 

used to create an optical lattice, and part 

of a system for driving stimulated 

Raman transitions. One laser provides a 

linewidth less than 100 kHz and a drift 

rate < 50 MHz/hour, locked to an 

external reference cavity. The other 

provides < 5 MHz linewidth (without an 

external reference cavity) but passive 

stability equal to the other. Both are 

completely reconfigurable to the point 

of removing all optical elements from 

the cavity, running the cavity in a linear 

configuration, and inserting an electro–

optic modulator. They employ phase–

locking optics and electronics with low 

drift rates, since they will not be locked 

to a spectroscopic reference. 

Docket Number: 07–005. Applicant: 

Millersville University Physics 

Department, Millersville PA. 

Instrument: HeNe Laser Cavity 

Educational Kit, Model CA–1200. 

Manufacturer: MICOS GmbH, Germany. 

Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 

20505, April 25, 2007. Reasons: The 

foreign instrument provides a test bench 

in the lab portion of a course on optics 

for instruction in the physical principles 

and the components of a laser. Students 

will use the kit to build and reconfigure 

a He–NE Laser themselves and study the 

role of different optical elements in the 

lasing effect. Lab studies will include 

intensity distribution, Gaussian beam, 

polarization, divergence, coherence 

monochromatism and other properties 

of light. 

Docket Number: 07–007. Applicant: 

Illinois Institute of Technology, 

Chicago, IL. Instrument: High 

Temperature Nano Test System. 

Manufacturer: Micro Materials, Ltd., 

UK. Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 

20505, April 25, 2007. Reasons: The 

foreign instrument provides 

examination of the mechanical 

properties of Ni–base alloys at elevated 

temperature. Nano–indentation tests can 

be conducted on specimens at a range 

of temperatures from room temperature 

to 750 C to assess the hardness and 

modulus of Ni–base alloys an also the 

constituent phases present in 

experimental Ni–base alloys and new 

high temperature materials. The 

instrument employs a unique 

horizontally designed pendulum 

indenter which enables insertion of a 

high temperature heating stage and tip 

heater as well as a protective heat shield 

to allow testing of specimens at 

temperatures in excess of 750 C. Other 

systems which use a vertical pendulum 

are currently limited to 400 C. 

Docket Number: 07–011. Applicant: 

State University of New York, Stony 

Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 

11794. Instrument: Low–level Beta 

Multicounter System. Manufacturer: 

Riso National Laboratory, Denmark. 

Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 

20505, April 25, 2007. Reasons: The 

foreign instrument provides 

measurement of emissions from very 

small quantities of naturally occurring, 

dissolved radioactive isotopes of 

thorium and lead in seawater which are 

attached to particulate matter in very 

small quantities. Samples of the 

isotopes are taken at various depths and 

serve as tracers of the movement of 

carbon to the deep, an important 

process for understanding climate 

change. The instrument is the only beta 

detector that meets the requirements of 

five simultaneous measurements with 

extremely low background count rates 

of 0.2 cpm. It is also portable and 

capable of field use in harsh 

environments. It also able to hold 22 

mm diameter filter holders and is in 

standard use by many low level 

radiation laboratories around the world. 

Docket Number: 07–012. Applicant: 

University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 

Instrument: Real–time 3D Motion 

Capture System. Manufacturer: Phoenix 

Technologies, Inc., Canada. Intended 

Use: See notice at 72 FR 20505, April 

25, 2007. Reasons: The foreign 

instrument provides accurate 

measurement of limb movements of 

monkey subjects performing reach–tograsp tasks. Electrical signals derived 

from individual brain cells are 

correlated with parameters of movement 

in order to determine how information 

is encoded in the signals that the brain 

uses to communicate with the muscles 

which is relevant to neuro–prosthetics, 

spinal chord injury, stroke and motor 

rehabilitation. The dimensions of the 

testing chamber require that the infrared 

position markers can operate at a 

minimum distance of 0.6 m. Other 

comparable systems require more than 

twice that distance. The Phoenix system 

also uses markers of much less 

diameter, which minimally interfere 

with natural limb movement. 

The capabilities of each of the foreign 

instruments described above are 

pertinent to each applicants intended 

purpose and we know of no other 

instrument or apparatus being 

manufactured in the United States 

which is of equivalent scientific value to 

any of the foreign instruments. 

Faye Robinson, 

Director, Statutory Import Program Staff, 

Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9921 Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Notice of Record of Decision for 

Louisiana Regional Restoration 

Planning Program 

AGENCY: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES