alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014184EN.01000601.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/6

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 March 2014 — Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS, Travetanche Injection SPRL v European Commission, Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-199/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH regulation) - Restrictions on the placing on the market and use of acrylamide - Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 amending Annex XVII of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006))

2014/C 184/08

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS, Travetanche Injection SPRL (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana, avocats)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Manhaeve and P. Oliver, Agents, and by J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, advocaten), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman and B. Koopman, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgement of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 February 2013 in Case T-368/11 Polyelectrolyte Producers Group and Others v Commission wherein the General Court dismissed an action for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 of 14 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (OJ 2011 L 101, p. 12) insofar as it imposes restrictions on the marketing of acrylamide for grouting applications

Polyelectrolyte Producers Group and Others

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS and Travetanche Injection SPRL shall pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS and Travetanche Injection SPRL shall pay the costs;

| 3. | The Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Andrew
P. Calerich, Chief Financial Officer of American Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

     1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the quarterly
period ending June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 19, 2003

/s/ Andrew P. Calerich
----------------------
Andrew P. Calerich
Chief Financial Officer




                                       21
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00224

- CR

Armando David Fernandez v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Jackson County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2301

- 11386

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
June 20 , 2024
# C_2015171EN.01000201.xml

| 26.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg

(Case C-279/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Copyright and related rights - Directive 2001/29/EC - Information society - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights - Article 3(2) - Direct broadcast of a sporting fixture on an internet site))

(2015/C 171/02)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Högsta domstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: C More Entertainment AB

Applicant:

Defendant: Linus Sandberg

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation extending the exclusive right of the broadcasting organisations referred to in Article 3(2)(d) as regards acts of communication to the public which broadcasts of sporting fixtures made live on internet, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, may constitute, provided that such an extension does not undermine the protection of copyright.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.2    
    


 
 

Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
  Named Executive Officer Base Compensation at September 30, 2007    
    


        This Exhibit discloses the current understandings with respect to base compensation between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") and each of: 



	•
	the
Company's principal executive officer (Mary G. Puma),



	•
	the
Company's principal financial officer (Stephen G. Bassett), and



	•
	the
three most highly compensated other executive officers serving as executive officers at December 31, 2006. 




These
executive officers are referred to herein as "named executive officers" or "NEOs." 


Other
than in the case of Mary G. Puma, the Company has not entered into any written agreements with its named executive officers addressing the amount of base salary due to the executive. The
Company's Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Ms. Puma is filed as Exhibit 10.3 to this Form 10-Q. The Company maintains that all executive officers, other
than Ms. Puma, are employees at will and that the Company has no obligation to pay base salary, other than (A) amounts accrued for services rendered prior to termination of employment
and (B) in circumstances where the Change of Control Agreements filed as Exhibit 10.4 to this Form 10-Q are applicable. 


In
the course of the employment relationship with each NEO, the Company communicates to the named executive officer the amount of base salary approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors, which compensation is subject to change in the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The following table sets forth the annual base salary as communicated to
the named executive officers of the Company as in effect at September 30, 2007 (reflecting changes effective August 18, 2007): 



	Named Executive Officer
 
	 	Title
	 	Base Salary

	

Mary G. Puma	
 	

President and Chief Executive Officer	
 	
$	

500,000
	

Stephen G. Bassett	
 	

Executive VP and Chief Financial Officer	
 	
$	

300,000
	

Matthew Flynn	
 	

Senior VP, Global Customer Operations	
 	
$	

350,000
	

Lynnette C. Fallon	
 	

Executive VP HR/Legal and General Counsel	
 	
$	

305,000
	

Kevin Brewer	
 	

Senior VP, Manufacturing Operations	
 	
$	

275,000













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.2


Axcelis Technologies, Inc. Named Executive Officer Base Compensation at September 30, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,675,046
<SECURITIES>                                     1,282
<RECEIVABLES>                                  376,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,026,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                 497,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,487,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,492,852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          553,930
<PREFERRED>                                     56,181
<COMMON>                                         5,602
<OTHER-SE>                                     759,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,487,626
<SALES>                                      2,166,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,270,911
<CGS>                                        1,055,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  345,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,705
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             251,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                196,860
<INCOME-TAX>                                    99,044
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,823
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (135,850)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (84,027)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)


</TABLE>
#### Gondrand Transport Corp., a/c Acme Watch Company et al. *v.*United States

No. 7776.

Entry No. 736913, etc.

(Decided January 20, 1950)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided *522in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712, *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the annexed schedule, which is marked “A” and made a part of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser's original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Perryman, Mojonier Co. *v.*United States

No. 7640.

Invoice dated London, England, May 22, 1946.

Certified May 27, 1946.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., July 26, 1946.

Entry No. 6095.

(Decided December 28, 1948)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7451

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CARLOS DEMOND ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:03-cr-00616-HMH-1)

Submitted: August 17, 2021 Decided: October 26, 2021

Before MOTZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Demond Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Demond Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We review a district court’s 

denial of a motion for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States v. 

Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that 

the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors 

did not warrant release. United States v. Robinson, No. 6:03-cr-00616-HMH-1 (D.S.C. 

Sept. 18, 2020); see United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181 (4th Cir. 2021) (holding that the 

district court must provide a sufficient explanation to allow for meaningful appellate 

review of its decision). We deny Robinson’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40953 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHNNIE FAE BEAUMONT, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 97-40953

- - - - - - - - - - December 1, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: * Johnnie Fae Beaumont, federal prisoner # 03051-078, appeals from the district court’s judgment denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to set aside her sentence. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and we affirm the district court’s judgment. Because Beaumont challenged the sufficiency of the evidence in her direct appeal, we do not reach the issue again in this appeal. See United States v. Kalish , 780 F.2d 506, 508 (5th Cir. 1986); United States v. Beaumont , 972 F.2d 553, 563-64 (5thNo. 97-40953 -2- Cir. 1992). None of the three grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel Beaumont raises for the first time on appeal rise to the level of plain error. See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). Beaumont’s double jeopardy claim is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Ursery , 116 S. Ct. 2135, 2149 (1996). Her conclusional conflict-of-interest assertion is insufficient to raise a § 2255 constitutional claim. See Koch v. Puckett , 907 F.2d 524, 530 (5th Cir. 1990). Finally, Beaumont’s claim that the fine was excessive is beyond the scope of her § 2255 motion. See United States v. Segler , 37 F.3d 1131, 1136-37 (5th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 91 (Friday, May 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26473-26474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10162]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Advisory Committee on Education; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 
92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' Advisory 
Committee on

[[Page 26474]]

Education will meet on May 20-21, 2008. The May 20 session will be held 
at Fort Hood in Killeen, Texas, at the Howze Auditorium from 9:45 a.m. 
to 12:15 p.m. It will continue at the Soldier Development Center, Bldg. 
33009, room G-254, second floor, from 1:15 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. The May 21 
session will be held at the Hyatt Place North Central in Austin, Texas, 
from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs on the administration of education and training programs for 
veterans, servicepersons, reservists, and dependents of veterans under 
Chapters 30, 32, 35, and 36 of title 38, and Chapter 1606 of title 10, 
United States Code.
    On May 20, the meeting will begin with opening remarks and an 
overview by Mr. James Bombard, Committee Chair. The agenda for this 
meeting will include an introduction of new members and a ``town hall'' 
forum at 11 a.m. with active duty, reservists and National Guard 
personnel. The agenda will also include an overview of pending 
legislation affecting the educational assistance programs VA 
administers and licensing and certification opportunities. Oral 
statements from the public will be heard at 4:15 p.m. on May 20. On May 
21, the Committee will reconvene and hold a second ``town hall'' forum 
beginning at 9 a.m. The Committee will then review and summarize issues 
raised during these sessions. Oral statements from the public will be 
heard at 2:45 p.m. on May 21.
    Interested persons may submit written statements to the Committee 
before the meeting, or within 10 days after the meeting, with Mr. 
Salminio Gamer, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans 
Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration (225B), 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420. Any member of the public wishing to attend 
the meeting should contact Mr. Salminio Garner or Mr. Barrett Bogue at 
(202) 461-9832.

    Dated: April 30, 2008.

    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E8-10162 Filed 5-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
**Exhibit 31.2**

Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 

I, Gary M. Wetstein, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-KSB of Non-Invasive Monitoring Systems, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Company’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s annual report for the year ended July 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditor and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: October 29, 2007
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kenyon,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Guy E. Fowler,  Chief
Financial Officer of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Guy E. Fowler
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Guy E. Fowler, CFO

Dated:  1/28/03