UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549



Form 10-KSB

(Mark One)

[X]

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007



[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the transition period from _________to _________



Commission file number 0-13309



ANGELES PARTNERS XII

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)



|                                |                     
|------------------------------- | --------------------
|California                      | 95-3903623          
|(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer    
|incorporation or organization)  | (Identification No.)



55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)



Issuer's telephone number    (864) 239-1000



Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:



None



Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:



Limited Partnership Units

(Title of class)



Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. [ ]



Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesX No___



Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes []  No[X]



State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year.$16,310,000



State the aggregate market value of the voting partnership interests held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such partnership interests as of December 31, 2007.  No market exists for the limited partnership interests of the Registrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can be determined.



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE None



Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):  Yes [ ] No [X]











FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS



The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking, including, without limitation, statements regarding the effect of redevelopments, the Partnerships future financial performance, including the Partnerships ability to maintain current or meet projected occupancy and rent levels, and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of risks and factors that are beyond the Partnerships control including, without limitation: natural disasters such as hurricanes; national and local economic conditions; the general level of interest rates; energy costs; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Partnerships properties and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Partnership operates; financing risks, including the risk that the Partnerships cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; insurance risks; development risks; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by the Partnership.   Readers should carefully review the Partnerships consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the section entitled Risk Factors described in Item 1 of this Annual Report and the other documents the Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



PART I



Item 1.

Description of Business



Angeles Partners XII (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") is a publicly-held limited partnership organized under the California Uniform Limited Partnership Act pursuant to the amended Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership (herein referred to as the "Agreement") dated May 26, 1983.  The Partnership's managing general partner is Angeles Realty Corporation II ("ARC II" or the "Managing General Partner"), a California corporation. The Managing General Partner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIMCO), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.  The Elliott Accommodation Trust and the Elliott Family Partnership, a California limited partnership, were the Non-Managing General Partners.  Effective December 31, 1997, the Elliott Family Partnership, Ltd. acquired the Elliott Accommodation Trust's general partner interest in the Partnership. On June 30, 2000, the Elliott Family Partnership sold its remaining interest to AIMCO Properties, L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary of AIMCO. The Managing General Partner and the Non-Managing General Partner are herein referred to collectively as the "General Partners". The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2035, unless terminated prior to such date.



Commencing May 26, 1983, the Partnership offered up to 80,000 units of Limited Partnership Interest (the units) at a purchase price of $1,000 per Unit with a minimum purchase of 5 Units pursuant to a Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Managing General Partner contributed capital in the amount of $1,000 for a 1% interest in the Partnership. The offering terminated on February 13, 1985. Upon termination of the offering, the Partnership had sold 44,773 units aggregating $44,773,000.









The Partnership is engaged in the business of operating and holding real estate properties for investment. In 1984 and 1985 during its acquisition phase, the Partnership acquired ten existing apartment properties and one existing commercial property. In 1990, the Partnership lost one of its apartment properties to foreclosure. During 1991, the Partnership acquired a 44.5% general partnership interest in a joint venture, Princeton Meadows Golf Course Joint Venture ("Joint Venture"), partnering with two affiliated partnerships. In 1999, the Partnership sold its only commercial property, one of its apartment properties and the Joint Venture sold its only investment property, Princeton Meadows Golf Course. In May 2001, the Partnership sold two of its apartment properties. In April and December 2005, the Partnership sold two of its six remaining apartment properties. As of December 31, 2007, the Partnership continues to own and operate four apartment complexes. (see "Item 2. Description of Properties").



The Partnership has no employees. The Managing General Partner is vested with full authority as to the general management and supervision of the business and affairs of the Partnership.  Limited partners and the Non-Managing General Partner have no right to participate in the management or conduct of such business and affairs.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner provides property management services for the Partnership's residential properties.



Risk Factors



The risk factors noted in this section and other factors noted throughout this Report describe certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the Partnerships actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.



Failure to generate sufficient net operating income may limit the Partnerships ability to pay distributions.



The Partnerships ability to make distributions to its investors depends on its ability to generate net operating income in excess of required debt payments and capital expenditure requirements. Net operating income may be adversely affected by events or conditions beyond the Partnerships control, including:



·

the general economic climate;

·

competition from other apartment communities and other housing options;

·

local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments, that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates;

·

changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance;

·

increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents;

·

changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multifamily housing; and

·

changes in interest rates and the availability of financing.



Redevelopment and construction risks could affect the Partnerships profitability.



One of the Partnerships properties, Twin Lake Towers Apartments, is currently under redevelopment. These activities are subject to the following risks:



·

the Partnership may be unable to obtain, or experience delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, occupancy, or other required governmental or third party permits and authorizations, which could result in increased costs or the delay or abandonment of opportunities;



·

the Partnership may incur costs that exceed its original estimates due to increased material, labor or other costs;









·

the Partnership may be unable to complete construction and lease up of a property on schedule, resulting in increased construction and financing costs and a decrease in expected rental revenues;



·

occupancy rates and rents at a property may fail to meet the Partnerships  expectations for a number of reasons, including changes in market and economic conditions beyond the Partnerships control and the development by competitors of competing communities;



·

the Partnership may abandon opportunities that it has already begun to explore for a number of reasons, including changes in local market conditions or increases in construction or financing costs, and, as a result, it may fail to recover expenses already incurred in exploring those opportunities; and



·

the Partnership may incur liabilities to third parties during the redevelopment process, for example, in connection with resident terminations, or managing existing improvements on the site prior to resident terminations.





The Partnerships existing and future debt financing could render it unable to operate, result in foreclosure on its properties or prevent it from making distributions on its equity.



The Partnerships strategy is generally to incur debt to increase the return on its equity while maintaining acceptable interest coverage ratios. Payments of principal and interest may leave the Partnership with insufficient cash resources to operate its properties or pay distributions.  The Partnership is also subject to the risk that its cash flow from operations will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, and the risk that existing indebtedness may not be refinanced or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. If the Partnership fails to make required payments of principal and interest on secured debt, its lenders could foreclose on the properties securing such debt, which would result in loss of income and asset value to the Partnership.



Competition could limit the Partnerships ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rents.



The Partnerships apartment properties compete for residents with other housing alternatives, including other rental apartments, condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent, as well as new and existing condominiums and single-family homes for sale. Competitive residential housing in such market area could adversely affect the Partnerships ability to lease apartments and to increase or maintain rental rates.



Laws benefiting disabled persons may result in the Partnerships incurrence of unanticipated expenses.



Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places intended to be used by the public are required to meet certain Federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Likewise, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after March 13, 1990, to be accessible to the handicapped. These and other Federal, state and local laws may require modifications to the Partnerships properties, or restrict renovations of the properties. Noncompliance with these laws could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could result in substantial capital expenditures. Although the Partnership believes that its properties are substantially in compliance with present requirements, the Partnership may incur unanticipated expenses to comply with the ADA and the FHAA.



Potential liability or other expenditures associated with potential environmental contamination may be costly.



Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of properties, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its properties.



Moisture infiltration and resulting mold remediation may be costly.



The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements.  The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.  Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the Managing General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents.  To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions.  Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships consolidated financial condition or results of operations.



A further description of the Partnership's business is included in "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation" included in "Item 6" of this 10-KSB.









Item 2.

Description of Property



The following table sets forth the Partnership's investments in properties as of December 31, 2007:



|                       |          |                                 |           
|---------------------- | -------- | ------------------------------- | ----------
|                       | Date of  |                                 |           
|Property               | Purchase | Type of Ownership               | Use       
|                       |          |                                 |           
|Hunters Glen Apts - IV | 01/31/85 | Fee ownership subject to first, | Apartment 
|Plainsboro, New Jersey |          | second, and third mortgages (1) | 264 units 
|                       |          |                                 |           
|Hunters Glen Apts - V  | 01/31/85 | Fee ownership subject to first, | Apartment 
|Plainsboro, New Jersey |          | second, and third mortgages (1) | 304 units 
|                       |          |                                 |           
|Hunters Glen Apts - VI | 01/31/85 | Fee ownership subject to first, | Apartment 
|Plainsboro, New Jersey |          | second, and third mortgages (1) | 328 units 
|                       |          |                                 |           
|Twin Lake Towers       |          |                                 |           
|Apartments             | 03/30/84 | Fee ownership subject to        | Apartments
|Westmont, Illinois     |          | first mortgage (1)              | 399 units 



(1)

Property is held by a Limited Partnership in which the Partnership ultimately owns a 100% interest.



Schedule of Properties



Set forth below for each of the Registrant's properties is the gross carrying value, accumulated depreciation, depreciable life, method of depreciation and federal tax basis.



|                      |                |              |             |                |          
|--------------------- | -------------- | ------------ | ----------- | -------------- | ---------
|                      | Gross          |              |             | Method         |          
|                      | Carrying       | Accumulated  | Depreciable | of             | Federal  
|Property              | Value          | Depreciation | Life        | Depreciation   | Tax Basis
|                      | (in thousands) |              |             | (in thousands)
|                      |                |              |             |                |          
|Hunters Glen Apts-IV  | $15,692        | $12,004      | 5-40 yrs    | Straight line  | $  4,164 
|Hunters Glen Apts-V   | 17,653         | 13,780       | 5-40 yrs    | Straight line  | 4,349    
|Hunters Glen Apts-VI  | 19,583         | 15,051       | 5-40 yrs    | Straight line  | 4,554    
|Twin Lake Towers Apts | 23,955         | 18,920       | 5-40 yrs    | Straight line  | 5,729    
|                      |                |              |             |                |          
|                      | $76,883        | $59,755      |             |                | $18,796  



See "Note A  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" of the consolidated financial statements included in "Item 7. Financial Statements" for a description of the Partnership's capitalization and depreciation policies.









Schedule of Property Indebtedness



The following table sets forth certain information relating to the loans encumbering the Partnership's properties.



|                      |                |          |           |          |               
|--------------------- | -------------- | -------- | --------- | -------- | --------------
|                      | Principal      |          |           |          | Principal     
|                      | Balance At     |          |           |          | Balance       
|                      | December 31,   | Interest | Period    | Maturity | Due At        
|Property              | 2007           | Rate (1) | Amortized | Date (2) | Maturity      
|                      | (in thousands) |          |           |          | (in thousands)
|                      |                |          |           |          |               
|Hunters Glen Apts IV  |                |          |           |          |               
|1st mortgage          | $10,903        | 5.51%    | 30 yrs    | 12/2015  | $ 9,374       
|2nd mortgage          | 5,360          | 5.63%    | 30 yrs    | 12/2015  | 4,622         
|3rd mortgage          | 4,529          | 5.84%    | 30 yrs    | 12/2015  | 3,959         
|Hunters Glen Apts V   |                |          |           |          |               
|1st mortgage          | 12,648         | 7.39%    | 30 yrs    | 12/2015  | 11,357        
|2nd mortgage          | 6,685          | 5.63%    | 30 yrs    | 12/2015  | 5,765         
|3rd mortgage          | 5,457          | 5.84%    | 30 yrs    | 12/2015  | 4,771         
|Hunters Glen Apts VI  |                |          |           |          |               
|1st mortgage          | 13,164         | 7.39%    | 30 yrs    | 12/2015  | 11,821        
|2nd mortgage          | 6,958          | 5.63%    | 30 yrs    | 12/2015  | 6,001         
|3rd mortgage          | 5,680          | 5.84%    | 30 yrs    | 12/2015  | 4,965         
|Twin Lake Towers Apts |                |          |           |          |               
|1st mortgage          | 10,197         | 4.54%    | 20 yrs    | 07/2013  | 7,385         
|                      | $81,581        |          |           |          | $70,020       



(1)

Fixed rate mortgages.



(2)

See "Item 7. Financial Statements - Note B  Mortgage Notes Payable" for information with respect to the Registrant's ability to prepay these loans and more specific details as to the terms of the loans.



On August 31, 2007, the Partnership obtained third mortgages in the total principal amount of approximately $15,714,000 on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V, and VI. The third mortgages bear interest at a fixed interest rate of 5.84% and require monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $93,000 in the aggregate beginning on October 1, 2007 through the December 1, 2015 maturity date.  The third mortgages have a balloon payment of approximately $13,695,000 due at maturity.  If no event of default exists at maturity, the maturity date will automatically be extended for one additional year, to December 1, 2016 during which period the third mortgages would require monthly payments of principal and interest, and would bear interest at a rate equal to the average of the one-month LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The Partnership may prepay the third mortgages at any time with 30 days written notice to the lender subject to a prepayment penalty. As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Partnership, to guarantee certain obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage financing. Loan costs of approximately $192,000 were incurred in connection with obtaining the third mortgages and have been capitalized and are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet included in Item 7, Financial Statements.









Rental Rates and Occupancy



Average annual rental rates and occupancy for 2007 and 2006 for each property were as follows:



|                                 |                |                |      |     
|-------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------- | ---- | ----
|                                 | Average Annual | Average Annual
|                                 | Rental Rates   | Occupancy     
|                                 | (per unit)     |                |     
|Property                         | 2007           | 2006           | 2007 | 2006
|                                 |                |                |      |     
|Hunters Glen Apartments  IV (1) | $12,538        | $11,986        | 98%  | 95% 
|Hunters Glen Apartments  V      | 12,487         | 11,809         | 97%  | 96% 
|Hunters Glen Apartments  VI     | 12,289         | 11,726         | 96%  | 95% 
|Twin Lake Towers Apartments      | 10,026         | 9,451          | 97%  | 98% 



(1)

The Managing General Partner attributes the increase in occupancy at Hunters Glen Apartments - IV to increased marketing and resident retention efforts.



As noted under "Item 1. Description of Business", the real estate industry is highly competitive. All of the properties of the Partnership are subject to competition from other residential apartment complexes in the area. The Managing General Partner believes that all of the properties are adequately insured. The residential properties are apartment complexes which lease units for terms of one year or less.  As of December 31, 2007, no residential tenant leases 10% or more of the available rental space.  With the exception of the property currently in redevelopment (as discussed in Capital Improvements below), the properties are in good physical condition, subject to normal depreciation and deterioration as is typical for assets of this type and age.



Real Estate Taxes and Rates



Real estate taxes and rates in 2007 for each property were:



|                            |                |       
|--------------------------- | -------------- | ------
|                            | 2007           | 2007  
|                            | Billing        | Rate  
|                            | (in thousands) |       
|                            |                |       
|Hunters Glen Apartments-IV  | $  344         | 2.208%
|Hunters Glen Apartments-V   | 398            | 2.218%
|Hunters Glen Apartments-VI  | 428            | 2.213%
|Twin Lake Towers Apartments | 388            | 5.587%



Capital Improvements



Hunters Glen Apartments IV



During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $701,000 of capital improvements at the property consisting primarily of floor covering, water heater and appliance replacements, electrical work, and kitchen and bath countertop resurfacing and air conditioning upgrades. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008. Such capital improvements will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Hunters Glen Apartments V



During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $393,000 of capital improvements at the property consisting primarily of floor covering, appliance, cabinetry and water heater replacements, and kitchen and bath countertop resurfacing. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008. Such capital improvements will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Hunters Glen Apartments VI



During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $691,000 of capital improvements at the property consisting primarily of floor covering, appliance, cabinetry, heating and air conditioning unit upgrades and structural improvements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow. The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. While the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008. Such capital improvements will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.



Twin Lake Towers Apartments



During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $93,000 of capital improvements at the property consisting of floor covering replacements.  These improvements were funded from operating cash flow.  During the third quarter of 2007 the Partnership began a redevelopment project at Twin Lake Towers Apartments.  The redevelopment project is estimated to cost approximately $24,328,000.  The work commenced November 2007 and is expected to be completed by April 2010.  The redevelopment is expected to consist of improvements to building exteriors, apartment interiors and common areas, plus construction of a new recreational and leasing center facility.  Improvements to the site will include landscaping, exterior lighting, signage, new parking garages and a swimming pool.  Improvements to the building exteriors will include masonry upgrades, balcony railing upgrades and new roofs.  Improvements to the apartment interiors will include upgrades to the kitchens, cabinetry, countertops, flooring, light fixtures, plumbing fixtures, closet doors and other finish type items.  Improvements to the common areas will include a redesign of the building entries and lobbies, new finishes for corridors and upgrading laundry rooms.  Various mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems will also be upgraded.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner will be supervising the redevelopment project and will receive a fee equal to 4% of the actual redevelopment costs incurred.  The Partnership expects to fund the redevelopment with advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner and available cash flow from Partnership operations.  During the construction period, certain costs will be capitalized and depreciated over the remaining life of the property. During the year ended December 31, 2007 the Partnership completed approximately $2,230,000 of capital improvements associated with the redevelopment project including capitalized construction period interest of approximately $13,000.  The Partnership regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. Other than the redevelopment project the Partnership has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, but certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.









Capital expenditures will be incurred only to the extent of cash available from operations, Partnership reserves, or advances from affiliates. To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnership's distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected, at least in the short term.



Item 3.

Legal Proceedings



In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others, the Partnership, its Managing General Partner and several of their affiliated partnerships and corporate entities. The action purported to assert claims on behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) that are named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of interests in certain Managing General Partner entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers by the Insignia affiliates to acquire limited partnership units; management of the partnerships by the Insignia affiliates; and the series of transactions which closed on October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby Insignia and Insignia Properties Trust, respectively, were merged into AIMCO. The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group (the "Heller action") was filed against the same defendants that are named in the Nuanes action. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The Heller action was brought as a purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution. On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted defendants motion to strike the complaint.  Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.



On January 8, 2003, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement in proposed settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action. On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an appeal (the Appeal) seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order approving the settlement and entering judgment thereto. On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a second appeal challenging the courts use of a referee and its order requiring Objector to pay those fees.



On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.  With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals vacated the trial courts order and remanded to the trial court for further findings on the basis that the state of the record is insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review.  The matter was transferred back to the trial court on June 21, 2005.  With regard to the second appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. With respect to the related Heller appeal, on July 28, 2005, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial courts order striking the first amended complaint.



On August 18, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a motion to disqualify the trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for cause on October 17, 2005, both of which were ultimately denied and/or struck by the trial court.   On or about October 13, 2005 Objector filed a motion to intervene and on or about October 19, 2005 filed both a motion to take discovery relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative representatives and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement.  On November 14, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Motion For Further Findings pursuant to the remand ordered by the Court of Appeals. Defendants joined in that motion.  On February 3, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the various matters pending before it and ordered additional briefing from the parties and Objector. On June 30, 2006, the trial court entered an order confirming its approval of the class action settlement and entering judgment thereto after the Court of Appeals had remanded the matter for further findings.  The substantive terms of the settlement agreement remain unchanged.  The trial court also entered supplemental orders on July 1, 2006, denying Objectors Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention, Objectors Motion for Leave of Discovery and Objectors Motion to Dissolve the Anti-Suit Injunction.  Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on July 10, 2006.



On August 31, 2006, the Objector filed a Notice of Appeal to the Courts June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 orders. The matter was argued and submitted and the Court of Appeal issued an opinion on February 20, 2008 affirming the order approving the settlement and judgment entered thereto. On March 12, 2008, the Court of Appeal denied Appellants Petition for Re-Hearing.  Appellant has until April 1, 2008 to file a Petition for Review with the California Supreme Court.



The Managing General Partner does not anticipate that any costs to the Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will be material to the Partnerships overall operations.



Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders



The unitholders of the Partnership did not vote on any matter through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.







PART II



Item 5.

Market for the Partnership's Common Equity and Related Security Holder Matters



The Partnership, a publicly-held limited partnership, sold 44,773 Limited Partnership Units during its offering period through February 13, 1985.  As of December 31, 2007, the Partnership had 1,061 Limited Partners of record and 44,718 Limited Partnership Units (the "Units") outstanding. As of December 31, 2007, affiliates of the Managing General Partner owned 33,750 limited partnership units or 75.47% of the outstanding Units.  No public trading market has developed for the Units, and it is not anticipated that such a market will develop in the future.



The following table sets forth the distributions made by the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except per unit data):



|               |              |             |              |            
|-------------- | ------------ | ----------- | ------------ | -----------
|               |              |             |              |            
|               | Year Ended   | Per Limited | Year Ended   | Per Limited
|               | December 31, | Partnership | December 31, | Partnership
|               | 2007         | Unit        | 2006         | Unit       
|               |              |             |              |            
|Operations     | $    100     | $  2.21     | $    696     | $ 15.41    
|Financings (1) | --           | --          | 1,328        | 29.43      
|Financings (2) | 15,000       | 332.08      | --           | --         
|Total          | $15,100      | $334.29     | $2,024       | $44.84     



(1)

From the December 2005 second mortgage financings on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V and VI.

(2)

From the August 2007 third mortgage financings on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V, and VI.



Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations, and the timing of debt maturities, property sales and/or refinancings. The Partnerships cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. Considering the current redevelopment project at Twin Lake Towers Apartments, it is not expected that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital improvement expenditures, to permit any distributions to its partners during 2008 or the foreseeable future.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 33,750 Units in the Partnership representing 75.47% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2007.  A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 75.47% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.









Item 6.

Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation



This item should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report.



The Partnerships financial results depend upon a number of factors including the ability to attract and maintain tenants at the investment properties, interest rates on mortgage loans, costs incurred to operate the investment properties, general economic conditions and weather. As part of the ongoing business plan of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner monitors the rental market environment of its investment properties to assess the feasibility of increasing rents, maintaining or increasing occupancy levels and protecting the Partnership from increases in expenses. As part of this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from the burden of inflation-related increases in expenses by increasing rents and maintaining a high overall occupancy level. However, the Managing General Partner may use rental concessions and rental rate reductions to offset softening market conditions, accordingly, there is no guarantee that the Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan. Further, a number of factors that are outside the control of the Partnership such as the local economic climate and weather can adversely or positively affect the Partnerships financial results.



Results of Operations



The Partnership recognized net income of approximately $2,088,000 and $1,448,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net income increased for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to an increase in total revenues along with a decrease in loss on sale of discontinued operations, partially offset by an increase in total expenses.



The Partnership recognized a loss on sale of discontinued operations of approximately $58,000 during the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of an increase in the estimated costs related to the sale of Pickwick Place Apartments in December 2005.



Total revenues increased for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to increases in both rental and other income. Rental income increased due to an increase in occupancy at Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V, and VI, an increase in the average rental rate at all of the Partnerships properties, partially offset by a decrease in occupancy at Twin Lake Towers Apartments and an increase in bad debt expense at Hunters Glen Apartments V and VI. Other income increased for the year ended December 31, 2007 primarily due to an increase in tenant utility reimbursements at Twin Lake Towers Apartments and an increase in interest income due to higher average cash balances.



Total expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to increases in operating, interest and property tax expenses, partially offset by decreases in depreciation and general and administrative expenses. Operating expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2007 primarily due to increases in property, maintenance, and insurance expenses and property management fees, partially offset by a decrease in administrative expense. Property expense increased primarily due to increases in salaries and related benefits at Hunters Glen Apartments IV. Maintenance expense increased primarily due to increases in repair costs associated with water pipe leaks and snow removal costs at both Hunters Glen Apartments IV and V. Insurance expense increased due to an increase in insurance premiums at Hunters Glen Apartments V and Twin Lake Towers Apartments, partially offset by a decrease in premiums at Hunters Glen Apartments VI.  Property management fees increased as a result of an increase in rental income on which such fee is based.  Administrative expense decreased primarily due to the recording of a liability during the year ended December 31, 2006 relating to the forfeiture of unclaimed property pursuant to applicable state and local laws at Hunters Glen Apartments V and Twin Lake Towers Apartments. Interest expense increased as a result of obtaining third mortgages at Hunter Glen Apartments IV, V, and VI, partially offset by a reduction in interest on the first and second mortgages encumbering the investment properties as a result of scheduled principal payments, which reduced the carrying balance of the mortgages. Property tax expense increased due to an increase in the tax rates at all of the investment properties, along with an increase in the assessed value of Twin Lake Towers Apartments.  The decrease in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 is due to assets becoming fully depreciated at Twin Lake Towers Apartments.



General and administrative expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to a decrease in the management fee based on net cash from operations payable to the Managing General Partner, partially offset by an increase in the cost of services included in the management reimbursements to the Managing General Partner as allowed under the Partnership Agreement.  Also included in general and administrative expenses for both the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are costs associated with the quarterly and annual communications with investors and regulatory agencies and costs associated with the annual audit required by the Partnership Agreement.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



At December 31, 2007 the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1,088,000 compared to approximately $973,000 at December 31, 2006. Cash and cash equivalents increased approximately $115,000 since December 31, 2006 due to approximately $4,536,000 of cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by approximately $3,707,000 and $714,000 of cash used in investing and financing activities, respectively.  Cash used in investing activities consisted of property improvements and replacements.  Cash used in financing activities consisted of principal payments on the mortgages encumbering the Partnerships properties, loan costs paid in connection with the third mortgages and distributions to partners, partially offset by loan proceeds received in connection with the third mortgages obtained on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V and VI. The Partnership invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.



The sufficiency of existing liquid assets to meet future liquidity and capital expenditure requirements is directly related to the level of capital expenditures required at the properties to adequately maintain the physical assets and other operating needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal, state, and local legal and regulatory requirements. The Managing General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance.  During the third quarter of 2007 the Partnership began a redevelopment project at Twin Lake Towers Apartments.  The redevelopment project is estimated to cost approximately $24,328,000.  The work commenced November 2007 and is expected to be completed by April 2010.  The redevelopment is expected to consist of improvements to building exteriors, apartment interiors and common areas, plus construction of a new recreational and leasing center facility.  Improvements to the site will include landscaping, exterior lighting, signage, new parking garages and a swimming pool.  Improvements to the building exteriors will include masonry upgrades, balcony railing upgrades and new roofs.  Improvements to the apartment interiors will include upgrades to the kitchens, cabinetry, countertops, flooring, light fixtures, plumbing fixtures, closet doors and other finish type items.  Improvements to the common areas will include a redesign of the building entries and lobbies, new finishes for corridors and upgrading laundry rooms.  Various mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems will also be upgraded.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner will be supervising the redevelopment project and will receive a fee equal to 4% of the actual redevelopment costs incurred.  The Partnership expects to fund the redevelopment with advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner and available cash flow from Partnership operations.  During the construction period, certain costs will be capitalized and depreciated over the remaining life of the property. During the year ended December 31, 2007 the Partnership completed approximately $2,230,000 of capital improvements associated with the redevelopment project including capitalized interest of approximately $13,000.  The Partnership has no other material commitments for property improvements and replacements, however, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during 2008. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the properties as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the properties.  Capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations, Partnership reserves or advances from affiliates.  To the extent that capital improvements are completed, the Partnerships distributable cash flow, if any, may be affected at least in the short term.



In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $2,162,000 to cover redevelopment costs at Twin Lake Towers Apartments, subsequent to December 31, 2007.  Interest on advances will be charged at prime plus 2%.  The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances.  For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



On August 31, 2007, the Partnership obtained third mortgages in the total principal amount of approximately $15,714,000 on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V, and VI. The third mortgages bear interest at a fixed interest rate of 5.84% and require monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $93,000 in the aggregate commencing on October 1, 2007 through the December 1, 2015 maturity date.  The third mortgages have a balloon payment of approximately $13,695,000 due at maturity.  If no event of default exists at maturity, the maturity date will automatically be extended for one additional year, to December 1, 2016 during which period the third mortgages would require monthly payments of principal and interest, and would bear interest at a rate equal to the average of the one-month LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The Partnership may prepay the third mortgages at any time with 30 days written notice to the lender subject to a prepayment penalty. As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Partnership, to guarantee certain obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage financing. Loan costs of approximately $192,000 were incurred in connection with obtaining the third mortgages and have been capitalized and are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet included in Item 7 Financial Statements.



The Partnerships assets are thought to be generally sufficient for any near term needs (exclusive of capital improvements and redevelopment costs) of the Partnership. The Partnership's mortgage indebtedness encumbering Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V and VI Apartments of approximately $71,384,000 matures in December 2015 with a one year extension option and balloon payments of approximately $62,635,000 due at maturity. The mortgage indebtedness encumbering Twin Lake Towers Apartments of approximately $10,197,000 matures in July 2013, at which time a balloon payment totaling approximately $7,385,000 will be due. The Managing General Partner will attempt to refinance the mortgages on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V, VI, and Twin Lake Towers Apartments and/or sell the properties prior to the maturity dates. If the properties cannot be refinanced or sold for a sufficient amount, the Partnership will risk losing the properties through foreclosure.







The Partnership distributed the following amounts during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands, except per unit data):



|               |              |             |              |            
|-------------- | ------------ | ----------- | ------------ | -----------
|               |              |             |              |            
|               | Year Ended   | Per Limited | Year Ended   | Per Limited
|               | December 31, | Partnership | December 31, | Partnership
|               | 2007         | Unit        | 2006         | Unit       
|               |              |             |              |            
|Operations     | $    100     | $  2.21     | $    696     | $ 15.41    
|Financings (1) | --           | --          | 1,328        | 29.43      
|Financings (2) | 15,000       | 332.08      | --           | --         
|Total          | $15,100      | $334.29     | $2,024       | $44.84     



(1)

From the December 2005 second mortgage financings on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V and VI.



(2)

From the August 2007 third mortgage financings on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V, and VI.





Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of cash generated from operations, and the timing of debt maturities, property sales and/or refinancings. The Partnerships cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis. Considering the current redevelopment project at Twin Lake Towers Apartments, it is not expected that the Partnership will generate sufficient funds from operations, after planned capital improvement expenditures, to permit any distributions to its partners during 2008 or the foreseeable future.



Other



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 33,750 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 75.47% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2007.  A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 75.47% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates



A summary of the Partnerships significant accounting policies is included in "Note A  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" which is included in the consolidated financial statements in "Item 7. Financial Statements". The ManagingGeneral Partner believes that the consistent application of these policies enables the Partnership to provide readers of the consolidated financial statements with useful and reliable information about the Partnerships operating results and financial condition.  The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.  Judgments and assessments of uncertainties are required in applying the Partnerships accounting policies in many areas. The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.



Impairment of Long-Lived Assets



Investment properties are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless the carrying amount of the asset is not recoverable.  If events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a property may not be recoverable, the Partnership will make an assessment of its recoverability by comparing the carrying amount to the Partnerships estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest charges, of the property.   If the carrying amount exceeds the aggregate undiscounted future cash flows, the Partnership would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the property.



Real property investment is subject to varying degrees of risk.  Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of the Partnerships investment properties.  These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic climate; competition from other apartment communities and other housing options; local conditions, such as loss of jobs or an increase in the supply of apartments that might adversely affect apartment occupancy or rental rates; changes in governmental regulations and the related cost of compliance; increases in operating costs (including real estate taxes) due to inflation and other factors, which may not be offset by increased rents; and changes in tax laws and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other laws regulating multi-family housing.  Any adverse changes in these factors could cause impairment of the Partnerships assets.



Capitalized Costs Related to Redevelopment and Construction Projects



The Partnership capitalizes costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects. Costs including interest, property taxes and operating costs associated with redevelopment and construction projects are capitalized during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress in accordance with SFAS No. 34, Capitalization of Interest Costs and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Properties. Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level.



Revenue Recognition



The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.







Item 7.

Financial Statements



ANGELES PARTNERS XII



LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Consolidated Balance Sheet - December 31, 2007



Consolidated Statements of Operations - Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006



Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Deficit - Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006



Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







The Partners

Angeles Partners XII





We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Angeles Partners XII as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners' deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.



We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Angeles Partners XII at December 31, 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.



/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP





Greenville, South Carolina

March 28, 2008







ANGELES PARTNERS XII



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(in thousands, except unit data)



December 31, 2007





|                                                       |            |         
|------------------------------------------------------ | ---------- | --------
|Assets                                                 |            |         
|Cash and cash equivalents                              |            | $  1,088
|Receivables and deposits                               |            | 565     
|Other assets                                           |            | 1,929   
|Investment properties (Notes B, E and F):              |            |         
|Land                                                   | $  6,468   |         
|Buildings and related personal property                | 70,415     |         
|                                                       | 76,883     |         
|Less accumulated depreciation                          | (59,755)   | 17,128  
|                                                       |            |         
|                                                       |            | $20,710 
|Liabilities and Partners' Deficit                      |            |         
|Liabilities                                            |            |         
|Accounts payable                                       |            | $    632
|Tenant security deposit liabilities                    |            | 476     
|Accrued property taxes                                 |            | 388     
|Other liabilities                                      |            | 907     
|Mortgage notes payable (Note B)                        |            | 81,581  
|                                                       |            |         
|Partners' Deficit                                      |            |         
|General partners                                       | $    (350) |         
|Limited partners (44,718 units issued and outstanding) | (62,924)   | (63,274)
|                                                       |            |         
|                                                       |            | $20,710 



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements









ANGELES PARTNERS XII



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per unit data)



|                                           |              |         
|------------------------------------------ | ------------ | --------
|                                           | Years Ended 
|                                           | December 31,
|                                           | 2007         | 2006    
|Revenues:                                  |              |         
|Rental income                              | $ 14,477     | $ 13,666
|Other income                               | 1,833        | 1,397   
|Total revenues                             | 16,310       | 15,063  
|                                           |              |         
|Expenses:                                  |              |         
|Operating                                  | 5,560        | 5,229   
|General and administrative                 | 463          | 502     
|Depreciation                               | 1,980        | 2,006   
|Interest                                   | 4,616        | 4,377   
|Property taxes                             | 1,603        | 1,443   
|Total expenses                             | 14,222       | 13,557  
|                                           |              |         
|Income from continuing operations          | 2,088        | 1,506   
|Loss on sale of discontinued operations    |              |         
|(Note A)                                   | --           | (58)    
|                                           |              |         
|Net income (Note C)                        | $2,088       | $1,448  
|                                           |              |         
|Net income allocated to general partners   | $     21     | $     14
|Net income allocated to limited partners   | 2,067        | 1,434   
|                                           |              |         
|                                           | $2,088       | $1,448  
|                                           |              |         
|Per limited partnership unit:              |              |         
|Income from continuing operations          | $  46.22     | $  33.35
|Loss on sale of discontinued operations    | --           | (1.28)  
|Net income per limited partnership unit    | $46.22       | $32.07  
|                                           |              |         
|Distributions per limited partnership unit | $334.29      | $44.84  



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements









ANGELES PARTNERS XII



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT

(in thousands, except unit data)







|                               |             |          |           |          
|------------------------------ | ----------- | -------- | --------- | ---------
|                               | Limited     |          |           |          
|                               | Partnership | General  | Limited   |          
|                               | Units       | Partners | Partners  | Total    
|                               |             |          |           |          
|Original capital contributions | 44,773      | $1       | $44,773   | $44,774  
|                               |             |          |           |          
|Partners' deficit              |             |          |           |          
|at December 31, 2005           | 44,718      | $ (215)  | $(49,471) | $(49,686)
|                               |             |          |           |          
|Net income for the year ended  |             |          |           |          
|December 31, 2006              | --          | 14       | 1,434     | 1,448    
|                               |             |          |           |          
|Distributions to partners      | --          | (19)     | (2,005)   | (2,024)  
|                               |             |          |           |          
|Partners' deficit at           |             |          |           |          
|December 31, 2006              | 44,718      | (220)    | (50,042)  | (50,262) 
|                               |             |          |           |          
|Net income for the year ended  |             |          |           |          
|December 31, 2007              | --          | 21       | 2,067     | 2,088    
|                               |             |          |           |          
|Distributions to partners      | --          | (151)    | (14,949)  | (15,100) 
|                               |             |          |           |          
|Partners' deficit at           |             |          |           |          
|December 31, 2007              | 44,718      | $(350)   | $(62,924) | $(63,274)





See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements







ANGELES PARTNERS XII



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)



|                                                     |              |         
|---------------------------------------------------- | ------------ | --------
|                                                     | Years Ended 
|                                                     | December 31,
|                                                     | 2007         | 2006    
|Cash flows from operating activities:                |              |         
|Net income                                           | $  2,088     | $  1,448
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash      |              |         
|provided by operating activities:                    |              |         
|Depreciation                                         | 1,980        | 2,006   
|Amortization of loan costs                           | 213          | 192     
|Loss on sale of discontinued operations              | --           | 58      
|Change in accounts:                                  |              |         
|Receivables and deposits                             | 99           | 35      
|Other assets                                         | 3            | 19      
|Accounts payable                                     | (13)         | 25      
|Tenant security deposit liabilities                  | 49           | (6)     
|Accrued property taxes                               | 22           | 32      
|Other liabilities                                    | 135          | 135     
|Due to affiliates                                    | (40)         | 24      
|Net cash provided by operating activities            | 4,536        | 3,968   
|                                                     |              |         
|Cash flows used in investing activities:             |              |         
|Property improvements and replacements               | (3,707)      | (2,418) 
|                                                     |              |         
|Cash flows from financing activities:                |              |         
|Payments on mortgage notes payable                   | (1,136)      | (1,017) 
|Proceeds from mortgage notes payable                 | 15,714       | --      
|Distributions to partners                            | (15,100)     | (2,024) 
|Loan costs paid                                      | (192)        | --      
|Net cash used in financing activities                | (714)        | (3,041) 
|                                                     |              |         
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 115          | (1,491) 
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year       | 973          | 2,464   
|                                                     |              |         
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of year             | $1,088       | $973    
|                                                     |              |         
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:    |              |         
|Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest  | $4,338       | $4,195  
|                                                     |              |         
|Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity:        |              |         
|Property improvements and replacements in accounts   |              |         
|payable                                              | $517         | $116    



Included in property improvements and replacements for the year ended December 31, 2006 are approximately $191,000 of property improvements and replacements which were included in accounts payable at December 31, 2005.



See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements













ANGELES PARTNERS XII



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2007





Note A - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



Organization: Angeles Partners XII (the "Partnership" or "Registrant") is a publicly-held limited partnership organized under the California Uniform Limited Partnership Act pursuant to the amended Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership (herein referred to as the "Agreement") dated May 26, 1983.  The Partnership's managing general partner is Angeles Realty Corporation II ("ARC II" or the "Managing General Partner"), a California corporation. The Managing General Partner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.  The Elliott Accommodation Trust and the Elliott Family Partnership, a California limited partnership, were the Non-Managing General Partners. Effective December 31, 1997, the Elliott Family Partnership, Ltd. acquired the Elliott Accommodation Trust's general partner interest in the Partnership. On June 30, 2000, the Elliott Family Partnership sold its remaining interest to AIMCO Properties, L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary of AIMCO.  The Managing General Partner and the Non-Managing General Partner are herein collectively referred to as the "General Partners".  The Partnership Agreement provides that the Partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2035, unless terminated prior to such date. As of December 31, 2007, the Partnership operates four residential properties in or near major urban areas in the United States.



Basis of Presentation: The Partnership sold one of its investment properties, Pickwick Place Apartments, in December 2005. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Partnership recognized a loss on sale of discontinued operations as a result of an increase in the estimated costs related to the sale.



Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements of the Partnership include the Partnership's interests in AP XII Associate GP, LLC and Hunters Glen Phase V GP, LLC, single member limited liability corporations, which are wholly-owned by the Partnership and AP XII Associates, LP which is wholly owned by the Partnership. All significant inter-entity balances have been eliminated. Minority interest is immaterial and not shown separately in the consolidated financial statements.



Allocation of Profits, Gains, Losses and Distributions: The Partnership will allocate all profits, losses and distributions related to the operations of its investment properties 1% to the General Partners and 99% to the Limited Partners.  All profits, losses and distributions related to the sales and/or refinancing of its investment properties will be allocated in accordance with the Agreement.



Except as discussed below, the Partnership will allocate distributions 1% to the General Partners and 99% to the Limited Partners.



Upon the sale or other disposition, or refinancing, of any asset of the Partnership, the distributable net proceeds shall be distributed as follows: (i) to the Partners in proportion to their interests until the Limited Partners have received cumulative distributions equal to their original capital contributions reduced by the amount of any previous distributions;  (ii) to the Partners until the Limited Partners have received distributions from all sources equal to their 6% cumulative distribution; (iii) to the Managing General Partner until it has received an amount equal to 3% of the aggregate Disposition Prices of all properties or other investments sold or otherwise disposed of, or refinanced; (iv), to the Partners in proportion to their interests until the Limited Partners have received cumulative distributions from all sources equal to 150% of the Capital Contribution of the Limited Partners; (v) to the Managing General Partner until it has received an amount equal to 17.6% of the distributions made pursuant to (iv); and (vi) 85% to the Limited Partners and non-Managing General Partner in proportion to their interests and 15% ("Incentive Interest") to the Managing General Partner.



Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.



Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks. At certain times, the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the limit on insured deposits. Cash balances include approximately $809,000 at December 31, 2007 that are maintained by an affiliated management company on behalf of affiliated entities in cash concentration accounts.



Tenant Security Deposits: The Partnership requires security deposits from lessees for the duration of the lease and such deposits are included in receivables and deposits. The security deposits are refunded when the tenant vacates, provided the tenant has not damaged the unit and is current on rental payments.



Deferred Costs: Loan costs of approximately $2,458,000, less accumulated amortization of approximately $769,000, are included in other assets. The loan costs are amortized over the terms of the related loan agreements. Amortization expense for 2007 and 2006 was approximately $213,000 and $192,000, respectively, and is included in interest expense. Amortization expense is expected to be approximately $221,000 for each of the years 2008 through 2012.



Leasing commissions and other direct costs incurred in connection with successful leasing efforts are deferred and amortized over the terms of the related leases.  Amortization of these costs is included in operating expenses.



Investment Properties: Investment properties consist of four apartment complexes and are stated at cost. The Partnership capitalizes costs incurred in connection with capital expenditure activities, including redevelopment and construction projects, other tangible property improvements and replacements of existing property components.  Costs including interest, property taxes and operating costs associated with redevelopment and construction projects are capitalized during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 34, Capitalization of Interest Costs and SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and the Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Properties.  Costs incurred in connection with capital projects are capitalized where the costs of the project exceed $250.  Included in these capitalized costs are payroll costs associated with time spent by site employees in connection with the planning, execution and control of all capital expenditure activities at the property level.  The Partnership capitalizes interest, property taxes, and operating costs during periods in which redevelopment and construction projects are in progress.  During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership capitalized construction period interest of approximately $13,000.  The Partnership did not capitalize any costs related to interest, property taxes or operating costs during the year ended December 31, 2006. Capitalized costs are depreciated over the useful life of the asset.  Expenditures for ordinary repairs, maintenance and apartment turnover costs are expensed as incurred.



In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the Partnership records impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets.  No adjustments for impairment of value were necessary for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006.



Segment Reporting: SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information" established standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports.  SFAS No. 131 also established standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. As defined in SFAS 131, the Partnership has only one reportable segment.



Depreciation: Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated lives of the apartment properties and related personal property. For Federal income tax purposes, the modified accelerated cost recovery method is used for depreciation of (1) real property additions over 271⁄2 years and (2) personal property additions over 5 years.



Leases:  The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.  The Partnership will offer rental concessions during particularly slow months or in response to heavy competition from other similar complexes in the area.  Rental income attributable to leases, net of any concessions, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.  The Partnership evaluates all accounts receivable from residents and establishes an allowance, after the application of security deposits, for accounts greater than 30 days past due on current tenants and all receivables due from former tenants.



Fair Value of Financial Instruments: SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments", as amended by SFAS No. 119, "Disclosures about Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments", requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value is defined in the SFAS as the amount at which the instruments could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership believes that the carrying amount of its financial instruments (except for long term debt) approximates their fair value due to the short term maturity of these instruments. The Partnership estimates the fair value of its long term debt by discounting future cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with that currently believed to be available to the Partnership for similar term, long term debt. The fair value of the Partnerships long term debt at the Partnerships incremental borrowing rate approximates its carrying value.



Advertising Costs: The Partnership expenses the costs of advertising as incurred.  Advertising costs of approximately $124,000and $127,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, are included in operating expense.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements:  In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48).  FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  The first step involves evaluation of a tax position to determine whether it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position.  The second step involves measuring the benefit to recognize in the financial statements for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold.  FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006.  The Partnership adopted FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007.  The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on the Partnerships consolidated financial condition or results of operations.



In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entitys own data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.  The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are applicable to recurring fair value measurements of financial assets and liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which for the Partnership is generally limited to annual disclosures required by SFAS No. 107.  The Partnership is in the process of implementing SFAS No. 157; however, it has not completed its evaluation and thus has not yet determined the effect that SFAS No. 157 will have on the Partnerships consolidated financial statements.



In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008, and at that time did not elect the fair value option for any of its financial instruments or other items within the scope of SFAS No. 159.



In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (the AICPA) issued Statement of Position No. 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies ("SOP 07-1").  SOP 07-1 provides guidance for determining whether the accounting principles of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies are required to be applied to an entity by clarifying the definition of an investment company and, whether investment company accounting should be retained by a parent company upon consolidation of an investment company subsidiary, or by an investor in the application of the equity method of accounting to an investment company investee.



In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SOP 07-1-1 that indefinitely defers the effective date of SOP 07-1.













Note B  Mortgage Notes Payable



The principal terms of mortgage notes payable are as follows:



|                      |                |           |          |          |               
|--------------------- | -------------- | --------- | -------- | -------- | --------------
|                      | Principal      | Monthly   |          |          | Principal     
|                      | Balance At     | Payment   | Standard |          | Balance       
|                      | December 31,   | Including | Interest | Maturity | Due At        
|Property              | 2007           | Interest  | Rate     | Date     | Maturity      
|                      | (in thousands) |           |          |          | (in thousands)
|                      |                |           |          |          |               
|Hunters Glen Apts IV  |                |           |          |          |               
|1st mortgage          | $10,903        | $ 64      | 5.51%    | 12/2015  | $ 9,374       
|2nd mortgage          | 5,360          | 32        | 5.63%    | 12/2015  | 4,622         
|3rd mortgage          | 4,529          | 27        | 5.84%    | 12/2015  | 3,959         
|Hunters Glen Apts V   |                |           |          |          |               
|1st mortgage          | 12,648         | 89        | 7.39%    | 12/2015  | 11,357        
|2nd mortgage          | 6,685          | 39        | 5.63%    | 12/2015  | 5,765         
|3rd mortgage          | 5,457          | 32        | 5.84%    | 12/2015  | 4,771         
|Hunters Glen Apts VI  |                |           |          |          |               
|1st mortgage          | 13,164         | 93        | 7.39%    | 12/2015  | 11,821        
|2nd mortgage          | 6,958          | 41        | 5.63%    | 12/2015  | 6,001         
|3rd mortgage          | 5,680          | 34        | 5.84%    | 12/2015  | 4,965         
|Twin Lake Towers Apts |                |           |          |          |               
|1st mortgage          | 10,197         | 76        | 4.54%    | 07/2013  | 7,385         
|                      | $81,581        | $527      |          |          | $70,020       



The mortgage notes payable are fixed rate mortgages that are non-recourse and are secured by a pledge of the Partnership's investment properties and by a pledge of revenues from the respective investment properties. Certain of the notes include prepayment penalties if repaid prior to maturity. Further, the properties may not be sold subject to existing indebtedness.



On August 31, 2007, the Partnership obtained third mortgages in the total principal amount of approximately $15,714,000 on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V, and VI. The third mortgages bear interest at a fixed interest rate of 5.84% and require monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $93,000 in the aggregate beginning on October 1, 2007 through the December 1, 2015 maturity date.  The third mortgages have a balloon payment of approximately $13,695,000 due at maturity. With respect to the first, second and third mortgages on Hunters Glen Apartments IV, V and VI, if no event of default exists at maturity, the maturity date will automatically be extended for one additional year, to December 1, 2016 during which period the mortgages would require monthly payments of principal and interest, and would bear interest at a rate equal to the average of the one-month LIBOR plus 250 basis points. The Partnership may prepay the mortgages at any time with 30 days written notice to the lender subject to a prepayment penalty. As a condition of the loan, the lender required AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Partnership, to guarantee certain obligations and liabilities of the Partnership with respect to the new mortgage financing. Loan costs of approximately $192,000 were incurred in connection with obtaining the third mortgages and have been capitalized.







Scheduled principal payments of mortgage notes payable subsequent to December 31, 2007, are as follows (in thousands):



|           |        
|---------- | -------
|2008       | $ 1,335
|2009       | 1,423  
|2010       | 1,506  
|2011       | 1,594  
|2012       | 1,677  
|Thereafter | 74,046 
|           | $81,581



Note C - Income Taxes



The Partnership has received a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that it will be classified as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes.  Accordingly, taxable income or loss of the Partnership is reported in the income tax returns of its partners and no provision for income taxes is made in the consolidated financial statements of the Partnership.



The following is a reconciliation of reported net income and Federal taxable income (in thousands, except per unit data):



|                                   |         |        
|---------------------------------- | ------- | -------
|                                   | 2007    | 2006   
|                                   |         |        
|Net income as reported             | $ 2,088 | $ 1,448
|Add (deduct):                      |         |        
|Depreciation differences           | (61)    | (141)  
|Unearned income                    | 76      | 39     
|Other                              | (63)    | 70     
|Federal taxable income             | $2,040  | $1,416 
|Federal taxable income per limited |         |        
|partnership unit                   | $45.32  | $31.35 



The following is a reconciliation between the Partnership's reported amounts and Federal tax basis of net liabilities (in thousands):



|                                    |          
|----------------------------------- | ---------
|Net liabilities                     | $(63,274)
|Land and buildings                  | 4,253    
|Accumulated depreciation            | (2,585)  
|Syndication and distribution costs  | 6,093    
|Other                               | 327      
|                                    |          
|Net liabilities - Federal tax basis | $(55,186)



Note D - Transactions with Affiliated Parties



The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for (i) certain payments to affiliates for services and (ii) reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.



Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from all of the Partnership's properties as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $800,000 and $747,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in operating expenses.





The Partnership Agreement provides for a fee equal to 7.5% of "net cash from operations", as defined in the Partnership Agreement to be paid to the Managing General Partner for executive and administrative management services. One half of this fee is to be accrued and not paid unless the limited partners have received distributions equal to a 5% cumulative annual return on their adjusted capital investment as defined in the Partnership Agreement or there are net proceeds from the sale or refinancing of a property.  No fee was earned during the year ended December 31, 2007.  A fee of approximately $40,000 was accrued during the year ended December 31, 2006.  Payments of approximately $40,000, representing the accrued fees due at December 31, 2006, were paid to the Managing General Partner, per the Partnership Agreement, in connection with the payment of operating distributions and the receipt of net proceeds from the third mortgages during the year ended December 31, 2007.



Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $464,000and $435,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses, and investment properties. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment properties for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are construction management services for certain capital improvement expenditures (not related to the redevelopment project) provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $151,000 and $209,000, respectively. In connection with the redevelopment project (as discussed in Note F), an affiliate of the Managing General Partner is to receive a redevelopment supervision fee of 4% of the actual redevelopment costs incurred.  The Partnership was charged approximately $68,000 in redevelopment supervision fees during the year ended December 31, 2007, which are included in investment properties.



In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $2,162,000 to cover redevelopment costs at Twin Lake Towers Apartments, subsequent to December 31, 2007.  Interest on advances will be charged at prime plus 2%.  The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances.  For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the Managing General Partner is entitled to receive a distribution equal to 3% of the aggregate disposition price of sold properties. The Partnership paid a distribution of $186,000 to the Managing General Partner related to the sale of Cooper Point Plaza in 1999. During 2001, the Partnership paid distributions of approximately $85,000 and $375,000 related to the sales of Briarwood and Gateway Gardens Apartments, respectively. These distributions are subordinate to the limited partners receiving their original capital contributions plus a cumulative preferred return of 6% per annum of their adjusted capital investment, as defined in the Partnership Agreement. If the limited partners have not received these returns when the Partnership terminates, the Managing General Partner will be required to return these amounts to the Partnership.



The Partnership insures its properties up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability, and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $588,000 and $476,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 33,750 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 75.47% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2007.  A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 75.47% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Note E - Investment Properties and Accumulated Depreciation



|                      |                |                |             |                |  | 
|--------------------- | -------------- | -------------- | ----------- | -------------- |  | 
|                      |                | Initial Cost   |            
|                      |                | To Partnership |            
|                      |                | (in thousands) |            
|                      |                |                |             |               
|                      |                |                | Buildings   | Cost          
|                      |                |                | and Related | Capitalized   
|                      |                |                | Personal    | Subsequent    
|Description           | Encumbrances   | Land           | Property    | to Acquisition
|                      | (in thousands) |                |             | (in thousands)
|Investment Properties |                |                |             |               
|Hunters Glen Apts IV  | $20,792        | $ 1,552        | $ 8,324     | $ 5,816       
|Hunters Glen Apts V   | 24,790         | 1,820          | 9,759       | 6,074         
|Hunters Glen Apts VI  | 25,802         | 1,981          | 10,620      | 6,982         
|Twin Lake Towers Apts | 10,197         | 1,115          | 12,806      | 10,034        
|Totals                | $81,581        | $6,468         | $41,509     | $28,906       



|                      |                               |           |         |                |          |             |  |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- | ----------------------------- | --------- | ------- | -------------- | -------- | ----------- |  |  |  |  | 
|                      | Gross Amount At Which Carried |           |         |               
|                      | At December 31, 2007          |           |         |               
|                      | (in thousands)                |           |         |               
|                      |                               | Buildings |         |                |          |            
|                      |                               | And       |         |                |          |            
|                      |                               | Related   |         |                |          |            
|                      |                               | Personal  |         | Accumulated    | Date     | Depreciable
|Description           | Land                          | Property  | Total   | Depreciation   | Acquired | Life-Years 
|                      |                               |           |         | (in thousands) |          |            
|Hunters Glen Apts IV  | $1,552                        | $14,140   | $15,692 | $12,004        | 01/31/85 | 5-40       
|Hunters Glen Apts V   | 1,820                         | 15,833    | 17,653  | 13,780         | 01/31/85 | 5-40       
|Hunters Glen Apts VI  | 1,981                         | 17,602    | 19,583  | 15,051         | 01/31/85 | 5-40       
|Twin Lake Towers Apts | 1,115                         | 22,840    | 23,955  | 18,920         | 03/30/84 | 5-40       
|Totals                | $6,468                        | $70,415   | $76,883 | $59,755        |          |            













Reconciliation of "Investment Properties and Accumulated Depreciation":



|                             |                          |         
|---------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------
|                             | Years Ended December 31,
|                             | 2007                     | 2006    
|                             | (in thousands)          
|Investment Properties        |                          |         
|Balance at beginning of year | $ 72,775                 | $ 70,432
|Property improvements        | 4,108                    | 2,343   
|Balance at end of year       | $76,883                  | $72,775 
|                             |                          |         
|Accumulated Depreciation     |                          |         
|Balance at beginning of year | $ 57,775                 | $ 55,769
|Additions charged to expense | 1,980                    | 2,006   
|Balance at end of year       | $59,755                  | $57,775 



The aggregate cost of the real estate for Federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2007 and 2006, is approximately $81,136,000 and $77,203,000, respectively.  The accumulated depreciation for Federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, is approximately $62,340,000 and $60,299,000, respectively.



Note F  Redevelopment



During the third quarter of 2007 the Partnership began a redevelopment project at one of its investment properties, Twin Lake Towers Apartments.  The redevelopment project is estimated to cost approximately $24,328,000.  The work commenced November 2007 and is expected to be completed by April 2010.  The redevelopment is expected to consist of improvements to building exteriors, apartment interiors and common areas, plus construction of a new recreational and leasing center facility.  Improvements to the site will include landscaping, exterior lighting, signage, new parking garages and a swimming pool.  Improvements to the building exteriors will include masonry upgrades, balcony railing upgrades and new roofs.  Improvements to the apartment interiors will include upgrades to the kitchens, cabinetry, countertops, flooring, light fixtures, plumbing fixtures, closet doors and other finish type items.  Improvements to the common areas will include a redesign of the building entries and lobbies, new finishes for corridors and upgrading laundry rooms.  Various mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems will also be upgraded.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner will be supervising the redevelopment project and will receive a fee equal to 4% of the actual redevelopment costs incurred.  The Partnership expects to fund the redevelopment with advances from AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner and available cash flow from Partnership operations.  During the construction period, certain costs will be capitalized and depreciated over the remaining life of the property.  During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Partnership completed approximately $2,230,000 of capital improvements associated with the redevelopment project including capitalized construction period interest of approximately $13,000.



Note G - Contingencies



In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the Partnership commenced an action entitled Rosalie Nuanes, et al. v. Insignia Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo. The plaintiffs named as defendants, among others, the Partnership, its Managing General Partner and several of their affiliated partnerships and corporate entities. The action purported to assert claims on behalf of a class of limited partners and derivatively on behalf of a number of limited partnerships (including the Partnership) that are named as nominal defendants, challenging, among other things, the acquisition of interests in certain Managing General Partner entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities that were, at one time, affiliates of Insignia; past tender offers by the Insignia affiliates to acquire limited partnership units; management of the partnerships by the Insignia affiliates; and the series of transactions which closed on October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby Insignia and Insignia Properties Trust, respectively, were merged into AIMCO. The plaintiffs sought monetary damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership. In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint captioned Heller v. Insignia Financial Group (the "Heller action") was filed against the same defendants that are named in the Nuanes action. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint. The Heller action was brought as a purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial dissolution. On January 28, 2002, the trial court granted defendants motion to strike the complaint.  Plaintiffs took an appeal from this order.



On January 8, 2003, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement in proposed settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action. On June 13, 2003, the court granted final approval of the settlement and entered judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions. On August 12, 2003, an objector ("Objector") filed an appeal (the Appeal) seeking to vacate and/or reverse the order approving the settlement and entering judgment thereto. On May 4, 2004, the Objector filed a second appeal challenging the courts use of a referee and its order requiring Objector to pay those fees.



On March 21, 2005, the Court of Appeals issued opinions in both pending appeals.  With regard to the settlement and judgment entered thereto, the Court of Appeals vacated the trial courts order and remanded to the trial court for further findings on the basis that the state of the record is insufficient to permit meaningful appellate review.  The matter was transferred back to the trial court on June 21, 2005.  With regard to the second appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the order requiring the Objector to pay referee fees. With respect to the related Heller appeal, on July 28, 2005, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial courts order striking the first amended complaint.



On August 18, 2005, Objector and his counsel filed a motion to disqualify the trial court based on a peremptory challenge and filed a motion to disqualify for cause on October 17, 2005, both of which were ultimately denied and/or struck by the trial court.   On or about October 13, 2005 Objector filed a motion to intervene and on or about October 19, 2005 filed both a motion to take discovery relating to the adequacy of plaintiffs as derivative representatives and a motion to dissolve the anti-suit injunction in connection with settlement.  On November 14, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Motion For Further Findings pursuant to the remand ordered by the Court of Appeals. Defendants joined in that motion.  On February 3, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the various matters pending before it and ordered additional briefing from the parties and Objector. On June 30, 2006, the trial court entered an order confirming its approval of the class action settlement and entering judgment thereto after the Court of Appeals had remanded the matter for further findings.  The substantive terms of the settlement agreement remain unchanged.  The trial court also entered supplemental orders on July 1, 2006, denying Objectors Motion to File a Complaint in Intervention, Objectors Motion for Leave of Discovery and Objectors Motion to Dissolve the Anti-Suit Injunction.  Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on July 10, 2006.



On August 31, 2006, the Objector filed a Notice of Appeal to the Courts June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 orders. The matter was argued and submitted and the Court of Appeal issued an opinion on February 20, 2008 affirming the order approving the settlement and judgment entered thereto. On March 12, 2008, the Court of Appeal denied Appellants Petition for Re-Hearing.  Appellant has until April 1, 2008 to file a Petition for Review with the California Supreme Court.





The Managing General Partner does not anticipate that any costs to the Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will be material to the Partnerships overall operations.



The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its investment properties that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.



Environmental



Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its properties, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its properties.



Mold



The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements.  The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure.  Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have implemented policies, procedures, third-party audits and training and the Managing General Partner believes that these measures will prevent or eliminate mold exposure and will minimize the effects that mold may have on residents.  To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions.  Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing General Partner can make no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships consolidated financial condition or results of operations.











ITEM 8.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE



None.



Item 8A.

Controls and Procedures



(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures



The Partnerships management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures are effective.



Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



The Partnerships management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officers of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, and effected by the Partnerships management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:



·

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets;



·

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Partnerships management; and



·

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



The Partnerships management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.  In making this assessment, the Partnerships management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.



Based on their assessment, the Partnerships management concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting is effective.



This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnerships registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to the attestation by the Partnerships registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Partnership to provide only managements report in this annual report.



(b)

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.



There have been no significant changes in the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.



Item 8B.

Other Information



On March 27, 2008, AIMCO announced that Scott W. Fordham, Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of AIMCO and the Managing General Partner, has announced his resignation.  Mr. Fordham has chosen to leave AIMCO to return to Texas to pursue an opportunity as chief accounting officer with an office REIT led by Tom August, the former CEO of Prentiss Properties Trust (Prentiss), with whom Mr. Fordham served as senior vice president and chief accounting officer prior to Prentisss 2006 merger with Brandywine Realty Trust.



Mr. Fordham will remain with AIMCO through the first quarter close in order to ensure an orderly transition.













PART III



Item 9.

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons and Corporate Governance; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act



The names of the directors and officers of Angeles Realty Corporation II ("ARC II" or the "Managing General Partner"), their ages and the nature of all positions with ARC II are set forth below. There are no family relationships between or among any officers or directors.



|                  |     |                                                          
|----------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Name              | Age | Position                                                 
|                  |     |                                                          
|Martha L. Long    | 48  | Director and Senior Vice President                       
|Harry G. Alcock   | 45  | Director and Executive Vice President                    
|Timothy Beaudin   | 49  | Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer   
|Lisa R. Cohn      | 39  | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  
|Patti K. Fielding | 44  | Executive Vice President  Securities and Debt; Treasurer
|Thomas M. Herzog  | 45  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     
|Scott W. Fordham  | 40  | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer       
|Stephen B. Waters | 46  | Vice President                                           



Martha L. Long has been a Director and Senior Vice President of the Managing General Partner since February 2004.  Ms. Long has been with AIMCO since October 1998 and has served in various capacities.  From 1998 to 2001, Ms. Long served as Senior Vice President and Controller of AIMCO and the Managing General Partner.  During 2002 and 2003, Ms. Long served as Senior Vice President of Continuous Improvement for AIMCO.



Harry G. Alcock was appointed as a Director of the Managing General Partner in October 2004 and was appointed Executive Vice President of the Managing General Partnerin February 2004 and has been Executive Vice President of AIMCO since October 1999.  Mr. Alcock has had responsibility for acquisition and financing activities of AIMCO since July 1994, serving as Vice President from July 1996 to October 1997 and as Senior Vice President from October 1997 to October 1999. Mr. Alcock focuses on transactions related to AIMCOs portfolio of properties in the western portion of the United States.



Timothy Beaudin was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer of the Managing General Partner and AIMCO in October 2005.  Prior to this time, beginning in 1995, Mr. Beaudin was with Catellus Development Corporation, a San Francisco, California-based real estate investment trust.  During his last five years at Catellus, Mr. Beaudin served as Executive Vice President, with management responsibility for development, construction and asset management.



Lisa R. Cohn was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Managing General Partner and AIMCO in December 2007.  From January 2004 to December 2007, Ms. Cohn served as Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of AIMCO.  Ms. Cohn joined AIMCO in July 2002 as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel.  Prior to joining AIMCO, Ms. Cohn was in private practice with the law firm of Hogan and Hartson LLP.



Patti K. Fielding was appointed Executive Vice President - Securities and Debt of the Managing General Partner in February 2004 and of AIMCO in February 2003.  Ms. Fielding was appointed Treasurer of AIMCO and the Managing General Partner in January 2005.  Ms. Fielding is responsible for debt financing and the treasury department.  Ms. Fielding previously served as Senior Vice President - Securities and Debt of AIMCO from January 2000 to February 2003.  Ms. Fielding joined AIMCO in February 1997 as a Vice President.











Thomas M. Herzog was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner and AIMCO in November 2005 and was appointed Executive Vice President of the Managing General Partner and AIMCO in July 2005.  In January 2004, Mr. Herzog joined AIMCO as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer and of the Managing General Partner in February 2004.  Prior to joining AIMCO in January 2004, Mr. Herzog was at GE Real Estate, serving as Chief Accounting Officer & Global Controller from April 2002 to January 2004 and as Chief Technical Advisor from March 2000 to April 2002.  Prior to joining GE Real Estate, Mr. Herzog was at Deloitte & Touche LLP from 1990 to 2000.



Scott W. Fordham was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in January 2007 of the Managing General Partner and AIMCO. Prior to joining AIMCO, Mr. Fordham served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Brandywine Realty Trust from January 2006 through December 2006. Prior to the merger of Prentiss Properties Trust with Brandywine Realty Trust, Mr. Fordham served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Prentiss Properties Trust and was in charge of the corporate accounting and financial reporting groups. Prior to joining Prentiss Properties Trust in 1992, Mr. Fordham worked in public accounting with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.



Stephen B. Waters was appointed Vice President of the Managing General Partner and AIMCO in April 2004.  Mr. Waters previously served as a Director of Real Estate Accounting since joining AIMCO in September 1999.  Mr. Waters has responsibility for partnership accounting with AIMCO and serves as the principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner.



One or more of the above persons are also directors and/or officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act. Further, one or more of the above persons are also officers of Apartment Investment and Management Company and the general partner of AIMCO Properties, L.P., entities that have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15 (d) of such Act.



The board of directors of the Managing General Partner does not have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors of the Managing General Partner fulfills the functions of an audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Martha L. Long meets the requirement of an "audit committee financial expert".



The directors and officers of the Managing General Partner with authority over the Partnership are all employees of subsidiaries of AIMCO. AIMCO has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such directors and officers that is posted on AIMCO's website (www.AIMCO.com). AIMCO's website is not incorporated by reference to this filing.



Item 10.

Executive Compensation



None of the directors and officers of the Managing General Partner received any remuneration from the Partnership during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.



Item 11.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management



Except as noted below, no person or entity was known by the Registrant to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Limited Partner Units of the Registrant as of December 31, 2007.













|                             |                 |            
|---------------------------- | --------------- | -----------
|Entity                       | Number of Units | Percentages
|                             |                 |            
|Cooper River Properties, LLC |                 |            
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      | 4,607           | 10.30%     
|Broad River Properties       |                 |            
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      | 8,002           | 17.89%     
|AIMCO IPLP                   |                 |            
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      | 1,824           | 4.08%      
|AIMCO Properties, LP         |                 |            
|(an affiliate of AIMCO)      | 19,317          | 43.20%     



Cooper River Properties, LLC, Broad River Properties and AIMCO IPLP are indirectly ultimately owned by AIMCO.  Their business address is 55 Beattie Place, Greenville, SC 29602.



AIMCO Properties, LP is indirectly ultimately controlled by AIMCO.  Its business address is 4582 S. Ulster St. Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237.



The Partnership knows of no contractual arrangements, the operation of the terms of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Partnership, except for: Article 12.1 of the Partnership Agreement which provides that upon a vote of the Limited Partners holding more than 50% of the then outstanding Limited Partnership Units the General Partners may be expelled from the Partnership upon 90 days written notice. In the event that successor general partners have been elected by Limited Partners holding more than 50% of the then outstanding Limited Partnership Units and if said Limited Partners elect to continue the business of the Partnership, the Partnership is required to pay in cash to the expelled Managing General Partner an amount equal to the accrued and unpaid management fee described in Article 10 of the Partnership Agreement and to purchase the General Partners' interest in the Partnership on the effective date of the expulsion, which shall be an amount equal to the difference between (i) the balance of the General Partner's capital account and (ii) the fair market value of the share of Distributable Net Proceeds to which the General Partners would be entitled.  Such determination of the fair market value of the share of Distributable Net Proceeds is defined in Article 12.2(ii) of the Partnership Agreement.



Item 12.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence



The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for (i) certain payments to affiliates for services and (ii) reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.



Affiliates of the Managing General Partner receive 5% of gross receipts from all of the Partnership's properties as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $800,000 and $747,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in operating expenses.



The Partnership Agreement provides for a fee equal to 7.5% of "net cash from operations", as defined in the Partnership Agreement to be paid to the Managing General Partner for executive and administrative management services. One half of this fee is to be accrued and not paid unless the limited partners have received distributions equal to a 5% cumulative annual return on their adjusted capital investment as defined in the Partnership Agreement or there are net proceeds from the sale or refinancing of a property.  No fee was earned during the year ended December 31, 2007.  A fee of approximately $40,000 was accrued during the year ended December 31, 2006.  Payments of approximately $40,000, representing the accrued fees due at December 31, 2006, were paid to the Managing General Partner, per the Partnership Agreement, in connection with the payment of operating distributions and the receipt of net proceeds from the third mortgages during the year ended December 31, 2007.



Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $464,000and $435,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expenses, and investment properties. The portion of these reimbursements included in investment properties for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are construction management services for certain capital improvement expenditures (not related to the redevelopment project) provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $151,000 and $209,000, respectively. In connection with the redevelopment project (as discussed in Item 7. Financial Statements - Note F), an affiliate of the Managing General Partner is to receive a redevelopment supervision fee of 4% of the actual redevelopment costs incurred.  The Partnership was charged approximately $68,000 in redevelopment supervision fees during the year ended December 31, 2007, which are included in investment properties.



In accordance with the Partnership Agreement, AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $2,162,000 to cover redevelopment costs at Twin Lake Towers Apartments, subsequent to December 31, 2007.  Interest on advances will be charged at prime plus 2%.  The Partnership may receive additional advances of funds from AIMCO Properties, L.P. although AIMCO Properties, L.P. is not obligated to provide such advances.  For more information on AIMCO Properties, L.P., including copies of its audited balance sheet, please see its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the Managing General Partner is entitled to receive a distribution equal to 3% of the aggregate disposition price of sold properties. The Partnership paid a distribution of $186,000 to the Managing General Partner related to the sale of Cooper Point Plaza in 1999. During 2001, the Partnership paid distributions of approximately $85,000 and $375,000 related to the sales of Briarwood and Gateway Gardens Apartments, respectively. These distributions are subordinate to the limited partners receiving their original capital contributions plus a cumulative preferred return of 6% per annum of their adjusted capital investment, as defined in the Partnership Agreement. If the limited partners have not received these returns when the Partnership terminates, the Managing General Partner will be required to return these amounts to the Partnership.



The Partnership insures its properties up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability, and vehicle liability. The Partnership insures its properties above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $588,000 and $476,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.



In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 33,750 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 75.47% of the outstanding Units at December 31, 2007.  A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 75.47% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to control all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Neither of the Managing General Partner's directors is independent under the independence standards established for New York Stock Exchange listed companies as both directors are employed by the parent of the Managing General Partner.



Item 13.

Exhibits



See Exhibit Index attached.



Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services



The Managing General Partner has reappointed Ernst & Young, LLP as independent auditors to audit the financial statements of the Partnership for 2008. The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young, LLP for 2007 and 2006 are described below.



Audit Fees. Fees for audit services totaled approximately $59,000 and $56,000 for 2007 and 2006, respectively. Fees for audit services also include fees for the reviews of the Partnerships Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB.



Tax Fees. Fees for tax services totaled approximately $15,000 for both of the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006.











SIGNATURES







In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



| |                                    
| | -----------------------------------
| | ANGELES PARTNERS XII               
| | (A California Limited Partnership) 
| |                                    
| | By:   Angeles Realty Corporation II
| | Managing General Partner           
| |                                    
| | By:   /s/Martha L. Long            
| | Martha L. Long                     
| | Senior Vice President              
| |                                    
| | By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters         
| | Stephen B. Waters                  
| | Vice President                     
| |                                    
| | Date: March 31, 2008               





In accordance with the Exchange Act this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                     |                        |                     
|-------------------- | ---------------------- | --------------------
|/s/Harry G. Alcock   | Director and Executive | Date: March 31, 2008
|Harry G. Alcock      | Vice President         |                     
|                     |                        |                     
|/s/Martha L. Long    | Director and Senior    | Date: March 31, 2008
|Martha L. Long       | Vice President         |                     
|                     |                        |                     
|/s/Stephen B. Waters | Vice President         | Date: March 31, 2008
|Stephen B. Waters    |                        |                     













ANGELES PARTNERS XII



EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit Number

Description of Exhibit



3.1

Amended Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership dated May 26, 1983 filed in Form S-11 dated June 2, 1983 and is incorporated herein by reference.



3.2

Amendment to the Amended Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership Agreement, dated October 22, 2007.



10.24

Multifamily Note dated June 26, 2003, between AIMCO Twin Lake Towers L. P., a Delaware limited partnership, and Keycorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc., an Ohio corporation related to Twin Lake Towers Apartments filed with the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.



10.36

Multifamily Note dated December 1, 2005 between Hunters Glen AP XII L.P., a South Carolina limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank in reference to Hunters Glen IV and filed December 7, 2005 with the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.



10.37

Amended and Restated Multifamily Note dated December 1, 2005 between Hunters Glen AP XII L.P., a South Carolina limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank in reference to Hunters Glen IV and filed December 7, 2005 with the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.



10.38

Multifamily Note dated December 1, 2005 between Hunters Glen AP XII L.P., a South Carolina limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank in reference to Hunters Glen V and VI and filed December 7, 2005 with the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.



10.39

Amended and Restated Multifamily Note dated December 1, 2005 between Hunters Glen AP XII L.P., a South Carolina limited partnership and GMAC Commercial Mortgage Bank in reference to Hunters Glen V and VI and filed December 7, 2005 with the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.



10.40

Form of Multifamily Note between Capmark Bank and Hunters Glen AP XII L.P, a South Carolina limited partnership in reference to Hunters Glen IV Apartments. Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2007.



10.41

Form of Multifamily Note between Capmark Bank and Hunters Glen AP XII L.P, a South Carolina limited partnership in reference to Hunters Glen V and VI Apartments. Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2007.



31.1

Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



31.2

Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



32.1

Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.