Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2013 / Notices 50075 

TABLE 1—ESTIMATES OF ANNUALIZED HOUR BURDEN

Type of respondent Instrument 

Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total 

number of 

responses 

Burden 

per 

response 

(hours) 

Annual 

burden 

(hours) 

Hourly 

wage rate 

($) 

Total cost 

($) 

State/Tribal Cross-Site Evaluation Instruments 

Project Evaluator ....... Prevention Strategies Inventory—State Tribal (PSI–ST).61 4 244 0 .75 183 37.82 6,922 

Provider (Trainees) .... Training Utilization and Preservation Survey 

(TUP–S).

2,000 1 2,000 0 .16 320 21.35 6,832 

Adolescents (Trainees).Training Utilization and Preservation Survey 

(TUP–S).

300 1 300 0 .16 48 7.25 348 

Provider (Trainees) .... Training Utilization and Preservation Survey 

(TUP–S): 6-Month Follow-up.

467 1 1,467 0 .16 75 21.35 1,602 

Provider (Stakeholder) Referral Network Survey (RNS) ................... 1,426 1 1,426 0 .67 956 21.35 20,411 

Project Evaluator ....... Coalition Profile (CP) .................................... 33 1 33 0 .33 11 37.82 417 

Provider (Stakeholder) Coalition Survey (CS) ................................... 426 1 426 0 .67 286 21.35 6,107 

Project Evaluator ....... Early Identification, Referral and Follow-up 

Analysis (EIRF).

61 4 244 5 1,220 37.82 46,141 

Project Evaluator ....... Early Identification, Referral and Follow-up 

Screening Form (EIRF–S).

27 4 108 1 108 37.82 4,085 

Project Evaluator ....... Training Activity Summary Page (TASP–ST) 61 4 244 .33 81 37.82 3,064 

TABLE 2—ANNUALIZED SUMMARY TABLE

Respondents Number of 

respondents 

Responses/ 

respondent 

Total 

responses 

Total 

annualized 

hour burden 

State/Tribal Cross–Site Evaluation Instruments 

Project Evaluators ............................................................................................ 243 17 873 1,603 

Adolescents (Trainees) .................................................................................... 300 1 300 48 

Provider (Trainees) .......................................................................................... 2,467 2 3,467 395 

Provider (Stakeholder) ..................................................................................... 1,852 2 1,852 1,242 

Campus Cross-Site Evaluation Instruments 

Project Evaluators ............................................................................................ 180 9 720 280 

Students ........................................................................................................... 7,202 5 8,802 3,709 

Provider Trainees ............................................................................................ 37,920 1 37,920 6,447 

Total 

Total .......................................................................................................... 50,164 53,934 13,724 

The estimate reflects the average 

annual number of respondents, the 

average annual number of responses, the 

time it will take for each response, and 

the average annual burden. While the 

different cohorts of grantees finish their 

grants at different times, it is assumed 

that new cohorts will replace previous 

cohorts. Therefore, the number of 

grantees in each year is assumed to be 

constant. 

Written comments and 

recommendations concerning the 

proposed information collection should 

be sent by September 16, 2013 to the 

SAMHSA Desk Officer at the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). To ensure timely receipt of 

comments, and to avoid potential delays 

in OMB’s receipt and processing of mail 

sent through the U.S. Postal Service, 

commenters are encouraged to 

submittheir comments to OMB via email 

to: OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

Although commenters are encouraged to 

send their comments via email, 

commenters may also fax their 

comments to: 202–395–7285. 

Commenters may also mail them to: 

Office of Management and Budget, 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, New Executive Office Building, 

Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503. 

Summer King, 

Statistician. 

[FR Doc. 2013–19985 Filed 8–15–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

[Docket No. DHS–2013–0023] 

Statewide Communication 

Interoperability Plan Template and 

Annual Progress Report 

AGENCY: National Protection and 

Programs Directorate, DHS. 

ACTION: 60-day notice and request for 

comments; New Information Collection 

Request: 1670–0017. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland 

Security (DHS), National Protection and 

Programs Directorate (NPPD), Office of 

Cybersecurity and Communications 

(CS&C), Office of Emergency 

Communications (OEC), will submit the 

following Information Collection 

Request to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) for review and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
50076 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 159 / Friday, August 16, 2013 / Notices 

clearance in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 

L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted until October 15, 2013. 

This process is conducted in accordance 

with 5 CFR 1320.1. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

questions about this Information 

Collection Request should be forwarded 

to DHS/NPPD/CS&C/OEC, 245 Murray 

Lane SW., Mail Stop 0640, Arlington, 

VA 20598–0640. Emailed requests 

should go to Serena Maxey, 

serena.maxey@hq.dhs.gov. Written 

comments should reach the contact 

person listed no later than October 15, 

2013. Comments must be identified by 

‘‘DHS–2013–0023’’ and may be 

submitted by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

• Email: Include the docket number 

in the subject line of the message. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the words ‘‘Department of 

Homeland Security’’ and the docket 

number for this action. Comments 

received will be posted without 

alteration at http://www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department of Homeland Security, 

Office of Emergency Communications 

(OEC), formed under Title XVIII of the 

Homeland Security Act of 2002, 6 

U.S.C. 571 et seq., is required, pursuant 

to 6 U.S.C. 572, to develop the National 

Emergency Communications Plan 

(NECP), which includes identification of 

goals, timeframes, and appropriate 

measures to achieve interoperable 

communications capabilities. In 2010, 

the Statewide Communication 

Interoperability Plan (SCIP) 

Implementation Report was cleared in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 and will expire 

in September of 2013. The SCIP 

Template and Annual Progress Report 

will replace the previous SCIP Template 

and SCIP Implementation Report. These 

updated documents (SCIP Template and 

Annual Progress Report) streamline the 

information collected by OEC to track 

the progress states are making in 

implementing milestones and 

demonstrating goals of the NECP. The 

process for completing the SCIP 

Template and Annual Progress Report 

will not change. 

The SCIP Template and Annual 

Progress Report will assist states in their 

strategic planning for interoperable and 

emergency communications while 

demonstrating each state’s achievements 

and challenges in accomplishing 

optimal interoperability for emergency 

responders. In addition, certain 

government grants may require states to 

update their SCIP Templates and 

Annual Progress Reports to include 

broadband efforts in order to receive 

funding for interoperable and 

emergency communications. Statewide 

Interoperability Coordinators (SWICs) 

will be responsible for the development 

and incorporation of input from their 

respective stakeholders and governance 

bodies into their SCIP Template and 

Annual Progress Report. SWICs will 

complete and submit the reports 

directly to OEC through unclassified 

electronic submission. 

OMB is particularly interested in 

comments that: 

1. Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

4. Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

Analysis 

Agency: Department of Homeland 

Security, National Protection and 

Programs Directorate, Office of 

Cybersecurity and Communications, 

Office of Emergency Communications. 

Title: Statewide Communication 

Interoperability Plan Template and 

Annual Progress Report. 

OMB Number: 1670–0017. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Affected Public: Statewide 

Interoperability Coordinators. 

Number of Respondents: 56 

respondents. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 10 

hours. 

Total Burden Hours: 560 annual 

burden hours. 

Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): 

$0. 

Total Recordkeeping Burden: $0. 

Total Burden Cost (operating/

maintaining): $28,918.40. 

Dated: August 12, 2013. 

Scott Libby, 

Deputy Chief Information Officer, National 

Protection and Programs Directorate, 

Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20025 Filed 8–15–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9910–9P–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Transportation Security Administration 

Intent To Request Renewal From OMB 

of One Current Public Collection of 

Information: Sensitive Security 

Information Threat Assessments 

AGENCY: Transportation Security 

Administration, DHS. 

ACTION: 60-day Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Transportation Security 

Administration (TSA) invites public 

comment on one currently approved 

Information Collection Request (ICR), 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number 1652–0042, 

abstracted below that we will submit to 

OMB for renewal in compliance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). 

The ICR describes the nature of the 

information collection and its expected 

burden. The collection involves TSA 

determining whether the party or 

representative of a party seeking access 

to sensitive security information (SSI) in 

a civil proceeding in federal court may 

be granted access to the SSI. 

DATES: Send your comments by October 

15, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be emailed 

to TSAPRA@dhs.gov or delivered to the 

TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information 

Technology (OIT), TSA–11, 

Transportation Security Administration, 

601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 

20598–6011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan L. Perkins at the above address, 

or by telephone (571) 227–3398. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. The ICR documentation is 

available at http://www.reginfo.gov. 

Therefore, in preparation for OMB 

review and approval of the following 

information collection, TSA is soliciting 

comments to— 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

information requirement is necessary for 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES