26056 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this proposed rule would not 

result in such an expenditure, we do 

discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 

in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not effect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD which guides the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is not likely to have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. A preliminary 

‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’

supporting this preliminary 

determination is available in the docket 

where indicated under ADDRESSES. We 

seek any comments or information that 

may lead to the discovery of a 

significant environmental impact from 

this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110 

Anchorage Grounds. 

Words of Issuance and Proposed 

Regulatory Text 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows: 

PART 110—ANCHORAGE 

REGULATIONS 

1. The authority citation for part 110 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 

1236, 2030, 2035, 2071; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Amend § 110.60, by revising 

paragraph (aa) to read as follows: 

§ 110.60 Port of New York and vicinity. 

* * * * * 

(aa) Perth Amboy, NJ. All waters 

bound by the following points: 

40°30′19.0′′ N, 074°15′46.0′′ W; thence to 

40°30′17.0′′ N, 074°15′39.0′′ W; thence to 

40°30′02.8′′ N, 074°15′45.0′′ W; thence to 

40°29′36.0′′ N, 074°16′09.2′′ W; thence to 

40°29′30.8′′ N, 074°16′22.0′′ W; thence to 

40°29′47.2′′ N, 074°16′52.0′′ W; thence to 

40°30′02.0′′ N, 074°16′43.0′′ W, thence 

along the shoreline to the point of 

origin. 

Note: This area is limited to vessels no 

greater than 20 meters in length and is 

primarily for use by recreational craft on a 

seasonal or transient basis. These regulations 

do not prohibit the placement of moorings 

within the anchorage area, but requests for 

the placement of moorings should be 

directed to the local government to ensure 

compliance with local and state laws. All 

moorings shall be so placed that no vessel, 

when anchored, will at any time extend 

beyond the limits of the area. 

Fixed mooring piles or stakes are 

prohibited. Mariners are encouraged to 

contact the local harbormaster for any 

additional ordinances and to ensure 

compliance with additional applicable 

state and local laws. 

Dated: April 23, 2008. 

Timothy V. Skuby, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting 

Commander, First Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. E8–10259 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Part 5b 

[Docket ID ED–2008–OM–0004] 

RIN 1880–AA85 

Privacy Act Regulations 

AGENCY: Office of Management, 

Department of Education. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Education 

(Department) proposes to amend its 

regulations implementing the Privacy 

Act of 1974, as amended (Privacy Act). 

These proposed regulations would 

amend the Department’s current Privacy 

Act regulations to exempt from certain 

Privacy Act requirements investigative 

material in a new system of records to 

be maintained by the Department that 

will be known as the Office of Inspector 

General Data Analytics System (ODAS) 

(18–10–02). Specifically, the exemption 

would apply to materials compiled by 

the Department’s Office of Inspector 

General (OIG) for law enforcement 

purposes to identify internal control 

weaknesses and system issues and to 

improve methods of data modeling and 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules 26057 

annual audit planning in order to detect 

and investigate fraud, waste, and 

mismanagement in Department 

programs and operations. 

DATES: We must receive your comments 

on or before June 9, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments 

through the Federal eRulemaking Portal 

or via postal mail, commercial delivery, 

or hand delivery. We will not accept 

comments by fax or by e-mail. Please 

submit your comments only one time, in 

order to ensure that we do not receive 

duplicate copies. In addition, please 

include the Docket ID at the top of your 

comments. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov to submit 

your comments electronically. 

Information on using Regulations.gov, 

including instructions for accessing 

agency documents, submitting 

comments, and viewing the docket, is 

available on the site under ‘‘How To Use 

This Site.’’

• Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, 

or Hand Delivery. If you mail or deliver 

your comments about these proposed 

regulations, address them to Regulatory 

Information Management Services, 

Office of Management, U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, 

SW., Room 8166, Washington, DC 

20202–5920. Attention: NOPR 

Comments. 

Privacy Note: The Department’s policy for 

comments received from members of the 

public (including those comments submitted 

by mail, commercial delivery, or hand 

delivery) is to make these submissions 

available for public viewing in their entirety 

on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 

www.regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters 

should be careful to include in their 

comments only information that they wish to 

make publicly available on the Internet. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shelley Shepherd, Office of Inspector 

General, U.S. Department of Education, 

400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 8166, 

Washington, DC 20202–5920. 

Telephone: (202) 245–7077. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD), you may call 

the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 

1–800–877–8339. 

Individuals with disabilities may 

obtain this document in an alternative 

format (e.g., Braille, large print, 

audiotape, or computer diskette) on 

request to the contact person listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Invitation to Comment 

We invite you to submit comments 

regarding these proposed regulations. 

We also invite you to assist us in 

complying with the specific 

requirements of Executive Order 12866 

and its overall requirement of reducing 

regulatory burden that might result from 

these proposed regulations. Please let us 

know of any further opportunities we 

should take to reduce potential costs or 

increase potential benefits while 

preserving the effective and efficient 

administration of the program. 

During and after the comment period, 

you may inspect all public comments 

about these proposed regulations by 

accessing Regulations.gov. You may also 

inspect the comments, in person, at the 

National Library of Education, 400 

Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, 

DC 20202, between the hours of 8:30 

a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern time, Monday 

through Friday of each week except 

Federal holidays. For more information 

on inspecting public comments call 

(202) 205–4410. 

Assistance to Individuals With 

Disabilities in Reviewing the 

Rulemaking Record 

On request, we will supply an 

appropriate aid to an individual with a 

disability who needs assistance to 

review the comments or other 

documents in the public rulemaking 

record for these proposed regulations. If 

you want to schedule an appointment 

for this type of aid, please contact the 

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Background 

Under the Inspector General Act of 

1978, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix) 

Inspectors General, including the 

Department’s Inspector General (OIG), 

are responsible for conducting, 

supervising, and coordinating audits 

and investigations relating to programs 

and operations of the Federal agency for 

which their office is established. The 

Department intends to establish a new 

system of records entitled the ‘‘Office of 

Inspector General Data Analytics 

System’’ (ODAS) (18–10–02) in order to 

facilitate the OIG’s performance of this 

statutory duty. 

The new system of records will be 

managed by the OIG’s Information 

Technology Audits and Computer 

Crimes Investigations (ITACCI) division, 

which is responsible for providing 

computer programming, data 

acquisition and analysis and statistical 

modeling in support of OIG operations. 

ITACCI will use this new system of 

records to gather data from Department 

systems and analyze them using data 

modeling techniques to detect waste, 

fraud, abuse, and internal control 

weaknesses and to identify potential 

violations of laws, rules and regulations. 

These data will include information 

related to transactions between the 

Department and individuals and entities 

that have applied for and/or received 

grants, contracts, loans, or payments 

from the Department. ITACCI will 

conduct data modeling on these data, 

using statistical and mathematical 

techniques, in order to predict 

anomalies indicating fraudulent activity 

and to predict which transactions have 

a high probability of fraudulent activity. 

ITACCI will review this information 

to determine whether further action is 

warranted. If so, ITACCI will refer 

potential violations of law, rules, or 

regulations that it identifies to other 

divisions of OIG for investigation, audit, 

or inspection, as appropriate. Thus, the 

ODAS will contain data related to 

transactions with the Department, as 

well as information related to ITACCI’s 

review and investigation of that data for 

law enforcement purposes. 

Pursuant to section (k)(2) of the 

Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), the 

Secretary, through rulemaking, may 

exempt from a limited number of 

Privacy Act requirements a system of 

records that contains investigatory 

materials compiled for law enforcement 

purposes. The investigatory materials in 

the ODAS will fall within the scope of 

section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act because 

the system will consist of investigatory 

materials compiled for purposes of 

enforcing Federal legal requirements 

applicable to individuals and entities 

receiving Department funds. 

Significant Proposed Regulations 

Exempt Systems (§ 5b.11(c)) 

Statute: Section (k)(2) of the Privacy 

Act provides that the head of any 

agency may promulgate rules to exempt 

any system of records from the 

requirements in sections (c)(3), (d), 

(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f) of 

the Privacy Act if the system of records 

contains investigatory material 

compiled for law enforcement purposes 

other than material related to criminal 

subjects and investigations that is 

within the scope of section (j)(2) of the 

Privacy Act. Section (k)(2) provides, 

however, that, in the event that any 

individual is denied any right, privilege, 

or benefit that the individual would 

otherwise be entitled to by Federal law, 

or for which the individual would 

otherwise be eligible, as a result of the 

maintenance of the material, the 

material must be provided to the 

individual, unless the disclosure of such 

material would reveal the identity of a 

source who furnished the information to 

the Department under an express 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
26058 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules 

promise, or, prior to September 27, 

1975, an implied promise that the 

identity of the source would be held in 

confidence. 

Current Regulations: The Department 

does not currently claim any exemption 

under section (k)(2) of the Privacy Act 

for the investigatory materials that will 

be maintained in the ODAS. However, 

the Department claims exemptions 

under this section for two other OIG 

systems of records—the Investigative 

Files of the Inspector General (18–10–

01) and the Hotline Complaint Files of 

the Inspector General (18–10–04). 

Proposed Regulations: The 

Department proposes to claim an 

exemption under section (k)(2) of the 

Privacy Act for investigatory materials 

that will be maintained in the ODAS. 

Reasons: As authorized by section 

(k)(2) of the Privacy Act and for the 

reasons specified in this section, the 

Secretary of Education proposes to 

exempt investigatory material compiled 

for law enforcement purposes in the 

ODAS from the following provisions of 

the Privacy Act and corresponding 

Departmental regulations: 

1. Section (c)(3) of the Privacy Act (5 

U.S.C. 552a(c)(3)) and 34 CFR 5b.9(c)(3) 

require the Department to make an 

accounting of disclosures from a system 

of records available to the individual 

named in the record at the individual’s 

request. The Secretary proposes to 

exempt the investigatory material 

compiled for law enforcement purposes 

in the ODAS because if OIG made this 

accounting available to a target 

individual, it could impede or 

compromise the OIG’s investigation 

efforts by prematurely revealing its 

existence and nature. In addition, if OIG 

were to make this accounting available 

to a target individual, the target could 

compromise, interfere with, or make 

witnesses reluctant to cooperate with 

the OIG investigation, and this could 

lead to the suppression, alteration, or 

destruction of evidence. 

2. Sections (d)(1) through (4) and (f) 

of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(1) 

through (4) and (f)) and 34 CFR 

5b.5(a)(1) and (c), 5b.7, and 5b.8 require 

the Department to provide access to 

records pertaining to an individual 

requestor, to follow specific procedures 

relating to requests for correction or 

amendment of records, and to notify an 

individual of the existence of records 

pertaining to him or her upon request. 

The Secretary proposes to exempt the 

investigatory material compiled for law 

enforcement purposes in the ODAS 

from these requirements because 

providing an individual with access to 

investigative materials and permitting 

the individual to contest the records’

contents and to try to force changes to 

the information contained therein could 

interfere with and compromise the 

ability of OIG to conduct an orderly and 

unbiased investigation of potential 

violations of laws, rules, and 

regulations. 

3. Section (e)(1) of the Privacy Act (5 

U.S.C. 552a(e)(1)) and 34 CFR 5b.4(a)(1) 

require the Department to maintain in 

its records only ‘‘relevant and 

necessary’’ information about an 

individual. This provision is 

inappropriate for OIG’s investigatory 

duties because it is not always possible 

to detect the relevance or necessity of 

each piece of information reported to 

the OIG or collected in the preliminary 

phase of an investigation. In some cases, 

it is only after the information is 

evaluated in light of other evidence that 

its relevance and necessity are clear. In 

other cases, what may appear to be a 

relevant and necessary piece of 

information may become irrelevant in 

light of further inquiry or investigation. 

In order not to impede the OIG’s 

investigation of potential violations of 

laws, rules, and regulations, the 

Secretary believes it is appropriate to 

exempt the investigatory materials in 

the ODAS from this requirement. 

4. Section (e)(4)(G) and (H) of the 

Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(G) and 

(H)) require the Department to publish 

notice of procedures for notification, 

access, and correction of records in the 

system. If the Department exempts the 

investigatory materials in the ODAS 

from the underlying Privacy Act 

requirements, notification of these 

requirements would be illogical. For 

this reason, the Department proposes to 

exempt the ODAS investigatory 

materials from this requirement as well. 

Executive Order 12866 

1. Potential Costs and Benefits 

Under Executive Order 12866, we 

have assessed the potential costs and 

benefits of this regulatory action. The 

potential costs associated with the 

proposed regulations are those resulting 

from statutory requirements and those 

we have determined to be necessary for 

administering this program effectively 

and efficiently. 

In assessing the potential costs and 

benefits—both quantitative and 

qualitative—of this regulatory action, 

we have determined that the benefits 

would justify the costs. 

Summary of Potential Costs and 

Benefits 

We do not view this proposed 

regulatory action as imposing any new 

costs as the Department is proposing 

only to exempt itself from having to 

meet limited Privacy Act requirements. 

We view the potential benefits as 

decreasing the risk that individual(s) 

whose actions are being investigated 

could interfere with or compromise the 

ability of the OIG to conduct an orderly 

and unbiased investigation of potential 

violations of laws, rules, and 

regulations. 

2. Clarity of the Regulations 

Executive Order 12866 and the 

Presidential memorandum on ‘‘Plain 

Language in Government Writing’’

require each agency to write regulations 

that are easy to understand. 

The Secretary invites comments on 

how to make these proposed regulations 

easier to understand, including answers 

to questions such as the following: 

• Are the requirements in the 

proposed regulations clearly stated? 

• Do the proposed regulations contain 

technical terms or other wording that 

interferes with their clarity? 

• Does the format of the proposed 

regulations (grouping and order of 

sections, use of headings, paragraphing, 

etc.) aid or reduce their clarity? 

• Would the proposed regulations be 

easier to understand if we divided them 

into more (but shorter) sections? (A 

‘‘section’’ is preceded by the symbol ‘‘§’’

and a numbered heading; for example, 

§ 5b.11 Exempt systems.) 

• Could the description of the 

proposed regulations in the ‘‘Significant 

Proposed Regulations’’ section be more 

helpful in making the proposed 

regulations easier to understand? If so, 

how? 

• What else could we do to make the 

proposed regulations easier to 

understand? 

Send any comments that concern how 

the Department could make these 

proposed regulations easier to 

understand to the person listed in the 

ADDRESSES section. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 

The Secretary certifies that these 

regulations would not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

These regulations involve procedural 

rights of individuals under the Privacy 

Act. Individuals are not considered to 

be ‘‘entities’’ under the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

These proposed regulations do not 

contain any information collection 

requirements. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules 26059 

Intergovernmental Review 

This program is not subject to 

Executive Order 12372 and the 

regulations in 34 CFR part 79. 

Assessment of Educational Impact 

The Secretary particularly requests 

comments on whether these proposed 

regulations would require transmission 

of information that any other agency or 

authority of the United States gathers or 

makes available. 

Electronic Access to This Document 

You may view this document, as well 

as all other Department of Education 

documents published in the Federal 

Register, in text or Adobe Portable 

Document Format (PDF) on the Internet 

at the following site: http://www.ed.gov/ 

news/fedregister. 

To use PDF you must have Adobe 

Acrobat Reader, which is available free 

at this site. If you have questions about 

using PDF, call the U.S. Government 

Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–

888–293–6498; or in the Washington, 

DC, area at (202) 512–1530. 

Note: The official version of this document 

is the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the Code 

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO 

Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ 

index.html. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Number does not apply.) 

List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 5b 

Privacy. 

Dated: May 2, 2008. 

Michell Clark, 

Assistant Secretary for Management. 

For the reasons discussed herein, the 

Department of Education proposes to 

amend part 5b of title 34 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations as follows: 

PART 5b—PRIVACY ACT 

REGULATIONS 

1. The authority citation for part 5b 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 5 U.S.C. 552a. 

2. Section 5b.11 is amended by 

revising paragraph (c)(1) introductory 

text to read as follows: 

§ 5b.11 Exempt systems. 

* * * * * 

(c) Specific systems of records 

exempted under (k)(2). (1) The 

Department exempts the Investigative 

Files of the Inspector General ED/OIG 

(18–10–01), the Hotline Complaint Files 

of the Inspector General ED/OIG (18–

10–04), and the Office of Inspector 

General Data Analytics System (ODAS) 

(18–10–02) from the following 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and this part 

to the extent that these systems of 

records consist of investigatory material 

and complaints that may be included in 

investigatory material compiled for law 

enforcement purposes: 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. E8–10110 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2007–0648; FRL–8563–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of State 

Implementation Plans; States of South 

Dakota and Wyoming; Interstate 

Transport of Pollution 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

State Implementation Plans (SIPs) 

submitted by the States of South Dakota 

and Wyoming that address interstate 

transport with respect to the 1997 8- 

hour ozone and fine particulate matter 

(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards. EPA has determined that the 

Interstate Transport declarations 

submitted by South Dakota on May 15, 

2007, and by Wyoming on May 3, 2007, 

satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air 

Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) provisions, 

also known as the ‘‘good neighbor’’

provisions, that a state SIP contain 

adequate provisions prohibiting air 

pollutant emissions from sources or 

activities in the state from adversely 

affecting another state. This action is 

being taken under section 110 of the 

Clean Air Act. 

In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’

section of this Federal Register, EPA is 

approving the States’ SIP revisions as a 

direct final rule without prior proposal 

because the Agency views these as noncontroversial SIP revisions and 

anticipates no adverse comments. A 

detailed rationale for the approval is set 

forth in the preamble to the direct final 

rule. If EPA receives no adverse 

comments, EPA will not take further 

action on this proposed rule. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, EPA will 

withdraw the direct final rule and it will 

not take effect. EPA will address all 

public comments in a subsequent final 

rule based on this proposed rule. EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this action. Any parties 

interested in commenting must do so at 

this time. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before June 9, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–

OAR–2007–0648, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: videtich.callie@epa.gov and 

mastrangelo.domenico@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert 

the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing 

comments). 

• Mail: Callie Videtich, Director, Air 

Program, Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–

AR, 1595 Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 

80202–1129. 

• Hand Delivery: Callie Videtich, 

Director, Air Program, Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 

Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop, 

Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. Such 

deliveries are only accepted Monday 

through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:55 p.m., 

excluding Federal holidays. Special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules Section of this 

Federal Register for detailed instruction 

on how to submit comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Domenico Mastrangelo, Air Program, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 

Wynkoop, Denver, Colorado 80202–

1129, (303) 312–6436, 

mastrangelo.domenico@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the 

information provided in the Direct Final 

action of the same title which is located 

in the Rules and Regulations section of 

this Federal Register. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: April 23, 2008. 

Robert E. Roberts, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

[FR Doc. E8–10100 Filed 5–7–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS