alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-957-07-9820-BJ-WY03]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to file the 
plats of survey of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days 
from the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Medicine 
Bow National Forest and is necessary for the management of these lands. 
The lands surveyed are:
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the east boundary, a portion of the west boundary, a portion 
of the subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of certain sections, 
Township 18 North, Range 79 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming, 
was accepted May 14, 2007.
    Copies of the preceding described plat and field notes are 
available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
[FR Doc. E7-9653 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4467-22-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# King remembered in virtual event

By Tim Hoyle  

                BATTLE CREEK, Mich.  –              
a video presentation

----

DLA users wishing to view the presentation on the network can stream it while logged in with their CAC.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA DSHeritage and Diversity DSPeople and Culture DSMLK Day
# C_2016038EN.01005201.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/52

---

Order of the General Court of 1 December 2015 — REWE-Zentral v OHIM — Planet GDZ (PRO PLANET)

(Case T-373/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 038/68)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: REWE-Zentral AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented initially by M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, and subsequently by M. Kinkeldey and C. Schmitt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Planet GDZ AG (Tagelswangen, Switzerland) (represented initially by M. Nentwig and G.M. Becker, and subsequently by M. Nentwig, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 June 2012 (Case R 1350/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Planet GDZ AG and REWE-Zentral AG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | REWE-Zentral and Planet GDZ AG are ordered to bear their own costs and are each ordered to pay half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

REWE-Zentral and Planet GDZ AG are ordered to bear their own costs and are each ordered to pay half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 20.10.2012.

1

---
file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0241 Focus Ready Draft 4/9/2012 ENGINEER: Avcin \ JD \ JAS

.file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM] SAT (concerns) (03/30/2012): Migration to groundwater: PMN negl; Incin Pdt rapid PBT rating: P3B2T2 PMN: P3B1T1, Health 1-2, Eco 1 // Incin Pdt: P3B2T2, Health 2, Eco, 3 Health: 2 Drinking Water, Inhalation, Inhalation for per-F acid Eco: 3 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claim:file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM] EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0241

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0241file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0241file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0241file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]file:///J|/SNURS/Quarterly%20SNUR%20Batches/Q13-4/July/P-12-0241%205(e)/p120241.eng.txt[8/2/2013 3:12:00 PM]
# C_2012287EN.01002401.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/24

---

Action brought on 9 July 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-331/12)

2012/C 287/44

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Hetsch, L. Nicolae and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to give effect to Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws, (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to give effect to Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws, (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4 of that directive;

1

| — | impose on the Republic of Poland, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a periodic penalty payment for failure to comply with its obligation to notify the Commission of the measures for transposing Directive 2009/136, at a daily rate of EUR 56 095,2, payable from the date on which judgment is delivered in the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

impose on the Republic of Poland, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a periodic penalty payment for failure to comply with its obligation to notify the Commission of the measures for transposing Directive 2009/136, at a daily rate of EUR 56 095,2, payable from the date on which judgment is delivered in the present case;

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which Directive 2009/136 had to be transposed expired on 25 May 2011.

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 337, p. 11.

1

---
No. 96-7923.

#### Koch *v.*Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 96-6015.

#### Grant *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

 OFFICE OF

PREVENTION, PESTICIDES

AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

MEMORANDUM

Date/Time: February 9, 2016 / 1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.

Subject: Paraquat Dichloride Meeting Minutes. OPP Meets with Technical 

Registrants of Paraquat Dichloride to Discuss the Relevance of Certain 

Proposed Mitigation Measures.

From: Marianne A. Mannix, Chemical Review Manager

Re-evaluation Management and Implementation Branch III

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P)

Participants: Kelly Sherman (EPA), Tracy Perry (EPA), Marianne Mannix (EPA), 

Nancy Fitz (EPA), Jonathan Becker (EPA), Monty Dixon (Syngenta), 

John Abbott (Syngenta), K.C. Lin (Sinon), Todd Denofreo (ADAMA), Jan 

Stechmann (Helm Agro), Rebecca Hargadine (Source Dynamics), Cheryl 

Wagner (Sharda and Willowood), Larry Miller (Sinon and US Raymat)

Meeting Minutes:

EPA met with the technical registrants of paraquat dichloride on February 9, 2016 to 

evaluate the initial set of mitigation measures to determine whether all of them were 

relevant given the new proposed mitigation measures. The technical registrants 

participated in the meeting through a conference line. During the meeting, EPA and the 

registrants discussed specific label amendments and the previously proposed packaging 

changes. The Agency and the registrants will meet on February 16th to discuss the 

paraquat specific training material component of the mitigation proposal.
Case No. 14,059a.

#### TISDALL v. The HERO.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofUSIP.Com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Kathy Christopher, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Kathy Christopher      |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|
| Kathy Christopher          |   |
| Controller, USIP.Com, Inc. |   |
|                       |   |
| August 12, 2003            |   |

 

 

USIP.Com, Inc. does not have a“Chief Financial Officer,” Kathy Christopher is the principal financial andaccounting officer.

 

----
Thanks for looking at this document. I hope you ’ re having a great day in training!
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00563

- CR

GILBERTO MIGUEL PERE Z

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 390th District Court of Travis County , Texas Trial Cause No. D

- 1

- DC

- 16

- 100279

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 20, 2019
Sylvain Caron, Eng, M.Sc.
 Soutex Inc,
 357 Jackson, Bureau 7
 Quebec, Quebec, G1N 4C4,
 Canada
    To the Board of Directors of Rubicon Minerals Corporation (the “Company”)
     I, Sylvain Caron, hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the technical report titled “F2 Gold System - Phoenix Gold Project Bateman Township Red Lake, Canada Technical Report” dated effective August 8th 2011 (the “Technical Report”) and to extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report in the written disclosure contained in the Company’s annual information form for the financial year ended December 31, 2012 dated March 12th, 2013.
   Dated as of this 12th day of March, 2013
     Original signed by:
  “/s/ Sylvain Caron”
  Sylvain Caron, Eng, M.Sc.
 Senior Metallurgist and Director
 Soutex Inc.
# C_2014315EN.01002701.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/27

---

Order of the Court of 15 July 2014 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission

(Case C-71/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from European Union financing - Expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic))

2014/C 315/41

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: I. Chalkias and E.Leftheriotou)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, H. Tserepa-Lacomb and A.Markoulli, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | The Hellenic Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Hellenic Republic is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6 April 2013.

1

---
No. 40478.

#### Protests 953439-G, etc., of Armour & Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel it was held that an allowance should have been made for the weight of the covering of fuller’s earth or of foil or paper or both in assessing duty on the cheese in question. *Kraft*v. *United States*(T. D. 47955) and *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 49302) followed.
# C_2015118EN.01000501.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Oost-Brabant, zittingsplaats ’s-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against N.F. Gielen, M.M.J. Geerings, F.A.C. Pruijmboom, A.A. Pruijmboom,

(Case C-369/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Drug precursors - Monitoring of trade between the Member States - Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 - Monitoring of trade between the European Union and third countries - Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 - Concept of ‘scheduled substance’ - Substance ‘alpha-phenylacetoacetonitrile’ (APAAN) - Scheduled substance ‘1-phenyl-2-propanone’ (BMK)))

(2015/C 118/07)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Oost-Brabant, zittingsplaats ’s-Hertogenbosch

Parties in the main criminal proceedings

Parties in the main criminal proceedings

N.F. Gielen, M.M.J. Geerings, F.A.C. Pruijmboom, A.A. Pruijmboom,

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors and Article 2(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 of 22 December 2004 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Community and third countries in drug precursors must be interpreted as meaning that the classification of ‘scheduled substance’, within the meaning of those provisions, does not apply to a substance, such as alpha-phenylacetoacetonitrile, which is not referred to in Annex I to Regulation No 273/2004 or the Annex to Regulation No 111/2005, even if it may, by readily applicable or economically viable means, within the meaning of those regulations, easily be converted into a substance referred to in those annexes.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
No. 55602.

#### Miami Rare Bird Farm, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 164993-K (Tampa).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Las Palmas Mobile Estates (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Diana
L.  Hassan,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 12, 2008



                                        By: /s/ DIANA L. HASSAN
                                            ___________________________
                                                Diana L. Hassan
                                                President
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      AND PRINCIPAL CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACCOMPANYING QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB OF 3DLP
INTERNATIONAL INC. FOR THE QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2003, I, KEN
TETTERINGTON, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF 3DLP
INTERNATIONAL INC. HEREBY CERTIFY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT:

     1.   Such quarterly report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
          30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2003, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 3DLP
          INTERNATIONAL INC.


Dated:    October 21, 2003

3DLP INTERNATIONAL INC.


By:  /s/ Ken Tetterington
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.1

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, John C.K. Sham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Global-Tech Appliances Inc.;

2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 33-8545];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 29, 2006



By:

/s/    John C.K. ShamJohn C.K. Sham President and
Chief Executive Officer