alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.33

ADDENDUM TO ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

This Addendum (the Addendum) is
entered into as of January 1, 2007, by and among MARYLAND RADIATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a Maryland corporation (MANAGEMENT SERVICES) and KATIN RADIATION THERAPY, P.A., a Maryland professional corporation (the
PA). This Addendum amends Section 3.1 of the Administrative Services Agreement dated October 31, 1998 between the parties (the Agreement) to adjust the monthly Service Fee of $12,500.00 paid in 2006 to a monthly Service Fee
of $16,667.67, and replaces the Addendum of that same Section dated January 1, 2006. From and after the date hereof, Section 3.1 shall read as follows:

3.1. Service Fee. For the services to be provided hereunder by MANAGEMENT SERVICES, the PA shall pay to MANAGEMENT SERVICES a monthly Service Fee of $16,667.67. The parties agree that the Service Fee represents
the fair market value of the services provided by MANAGEMENT SERVICES hereunder and that the parties shall meet annually to reevaluate the value of services provided by MANAGEMENT SERVICES and shall establish the fair market value thereof for
purposes of this Section 3.1.



|          |  |                                                      |  |                             
|--------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Accepted: |  | MARYLAND RADIATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, INC.
|          |  |                                                     
|          |  | By:                                                  |  | /s/ David Koeninger         
|          |  |                                                      |  | David Koeninger             
|          |  |                                                      |  | Vice President & CFO        
|          | 
|Accepted: |  | KATIN RADIATION THERAPY, P.A.                       
|          |  |                                                     
|          |  | By:                                                  |  | /s/ Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D.
|          |  |                                                      |  | Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D.    
|          |  |                                                      |  | Vice President
----

----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August 30, 2013 |   |   /s/ Samuel W. Fairchild                |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Samuel W. Fairchild                           |
|                              |   | President and Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|                              |   | (principal executive and financial officer)   |

----

----
# C_2012273EN.01001002.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/10

---

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Chico’s Brands Investments v OHIM — Artsana (CHICO’S)

(Case T-83/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 273/17

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Chico’s Brands Investments, Inc. (Fort Myers, United States) (represented by: T. Holman, solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Artsana SpA (Grandate, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 October 2011 (Case R 2084/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Artsana SpA and Chico’s Brands Investments, Inc.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.

1

---
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-0735V 

Filed: November 3, 2016 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

KEVEN OTTENI, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder 

 * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices, Washington, DC, for petitioner. 

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On June 22, 2016, Keven Otteni (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et 

seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that was 

administered to his left shoulder on October 25, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was 

assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On November 3, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner’s alleged injury is 

consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (‘SIRVA’), and it was 

caused by the flu vaccination that petitioner received on October 25, 2015. Id. at 5. 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

Respondent further agrees that no other causes for petitioner’s shoulder injury were 

identified and “the medical records show that he suffered the residual effects of his 

condition for more than six months.” Id.

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9761]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority 302]


Delegation by the Secretary of State to Maura Harty of 
Authorities Normally Vested in the Under Secretary for Management

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State by 
the laws of the United States, including, Section 1 of the State 
Departments Basic Authorities Act. As amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I 
hereby delegate to Maura A. Harty, to the extent authorized by law, all 
authorities that have been or may be delegated to the Under Secretary 
for Management.
    Any authority covered by this delegation may also be exercised by 
the Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, or the Under Secretary for 
Management.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to or 
affected by, this delegation of authority shall be deemed to be such 
act, executive order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to 
time.
    This delegation shall expire upon the appointment and entry upon 
duty of an individual to replace Henrietta H. Fore as the Under 
Secretary of State for Management.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: May 10, 2007.
Condoleezza Rice,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7-9761 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```

[115th Congress Public Law 213]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1542]]

Public Law 115-213
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 108 West Schick Road in Bloomingdale, Illinois, as the ``Bloomingdale 
Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 24, 2018 -  [H.R. 
                                4574]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BLOOMINGDALE VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 108 West Schick Road in Bloomingdale, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Bloomingdale Veterans Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Bloomingdale Veterans Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 24, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4574:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            May 7, considered and passed House.
            June 28, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1941 

To amend the securities laws to establish certain thresholds for shareholder 

registration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2011 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. BLUNT, Mrs. 

MCCASKILL, Mr. MORAN, Mr. VITTER, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, 

Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. SHELBY, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the securities laws to establish certain thresholds 

for shareholder registration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHAREHOLDER REGISTRATION THRESHOLD. 

4 (a) AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURI5 TIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.—Section 12(g) of the Se6 curities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 781(g)) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1941 IS

1 (A) by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) 

2 and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(1) in the case of an issuer that is a bank, as 

4 such term is defined in section 3(a)(6) of this title, 

5 or a bank holding company, as such term is defined 

6 in section (2) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 

7 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841), 2000 persons or more; and 

8 ‘‘(2) in the case of an issuer that is not a bank 

9 or bank holding company, 500 persons or more,’’; 

10 and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘commerce shall’’ and in12 serting ‘‘commerce shall, not later than 120 

13 days after the last day of its first fiscal year 

14 ended after the effective date of this subsection, 

15 on which the issuer has total assets exceeding 

16 $10,000,000 and a class of equity security 

17 (other than an exempted security) held of 

18 record by’’; and 

19 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘three hun20 dred’’ and inserting ‘‘300 persons, or, in the case of 

21 a bank, as such term is defined in section 3(a)(6), 

22 or a bank holding company, as such term is defined 

23 in section (2) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 

24 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841), 1200’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 1941 IS

1 (b) AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 15 OF THE SECURI2 TIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.—Section 15(d) of the Se3 curities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) is 

4 amended, in the third sentence, by striking ‘‘three hun5 dred’’ and inserting ‘‘300 persons, or, in the case of bank, 

6 as such term is defined in section 3(a)(6), or a bank hold7 ing company, as such term is defined in section (2) of the 

8 Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841), 

9 1200’’. 

10 SEC. 2. RULEMAKING. 

11 Not later than one year after the date of enactment 

12 of this Act, the Commission shall issue final regulations 

13 to implement this Act and the amendments made by this 

14 Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Forrest P. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer ofIWT Tesoro Corporation, certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q/A of IWT Tesoro Corporationfor the quarter ended June 30 , 2004;

 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and proceduresto ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior tothe filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6.       Ihave indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 

 
| Date:  September 23, 2004 | By:                      | /s/ Forrest P.  Jordan |   |
|---------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                      | Forrest  P. Jordan,      |
|                      | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

          - 48 CFR Part 3002

### CFR Correction

In title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, chapter 29 to end, revised as of October 1, 2007, on page 66, in 3002.101, remove the definition of “Organizational Element (OE)”.

[FR Doc. E8-10061 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# C_2016314EN.01001801.xml

| 29.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2016 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-143/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Postal sector - Financing of the additional labour and social costs relating to some of the staff of Deutsche Post by means of subsidies and revenue generated by the remuneration for price-regulated services - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of advantage - ‘Combus’ judgment - Demonstration of the existence of an economic and selective advantage - No such advantage))

(2016/C 314/24)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze and K. Petersen, and subsequently T. Henze and K. Stranz, acting as Agents, and U. Soltész, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Grespan, T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Articles 1 and 4 to 6 of Commission Decision 2012/636/EU of 25 January 2012 on Measure C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07) implemented by Germany for Deutsche Post AG (OJ 2012 L 289, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Articles 1 and 4 to 6 of Commission Decision 2012/636/EU of 25 January 2012 on Measure C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07) implemented by Germany for Deutsche Post AG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Articles 1 and 4 to 6 of Commission Decision 2012/636/EU of 25 January 2012 on Measure C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07) implemented by Germany for Deutsche Post AG;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Las Palmas Mobile Estates (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  June 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Diana L. Hassan, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 14, 2007



                                        By: /s/ DIANA L. HASSAN
                                            ___________________________
                                                Diana L. Hassan
                                                Secretary and Treasurer