### United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA

Environmental Protection and Toxic Substances September 2007 Agency (7508P)



# Reregistration Eligibility Decision for

Aldicarb

### Page 2 of 191 

# Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) Document

for Aldicarb

List A

Case Number 0140

Approved by: Date: Steven Bradbury, Ph.D.

Director Special Review and Reregistration Division

### Page 3 of 191 Table of Contents

Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision Team.................................................................... 5 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ 6

Abstract....................................................................................................................... ................... 8

I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ ............... 9

II. Chemical Overview.......................................................................................................... ...... 11

A

. Chemical Identity ................................................................................................................11

B

. Regulatory History ..............................................................................................................12

C

. Use and Usage Profile .........................................................................................................12

D. Tolerances ............................................................................................................................13

III. Aldicarb Human Health and Environmenta l Fate and Effects Risk Assessments ........ 14

A. Human Health .....................................................................................................................14

B. Environmental Fate and Effects ........................................................................................14 IV. Risk Management, Reregistration Decision , and Tolerance Reassessment Decisions... 18 A. Determination of Reregistration Eligibility ......................................................................18 B. Public Comments and Responses ......................................................................................18 C. Regulatory Position .............................................................................................................19 1. Food Quality Protection Act Findings .......................................................................... 19 a. "Risk Cup" Determination ........................................................................................ 19 b. Determination of Safety to U.S. Po pulation (Including Infants and Children) .... 19 c. Endocrine Disruptor Effects ...................................................................................... 19

d. Cumulative Risks ........................................................................................................ 20 2. Tolerance Summary ........................................................................................................ 20 D. Regulatory Rationale ..........................................................................................................22 1. Human Health Risk Management and Mitigation ...................................................... 22 a. Dietary Risk Mitigation (Food and Drinking Water) .............................................. 22 b. Aggregate Risk Mitigation ......................................................................................... 23 c. Occupational Risk Mitigation .................................................................................... 23 2. Ecological Risk Man agement and Mitigation .............................................................. 23

a . Terrestrial and Aquatic Organisms .......................................................................... 23 3. Mitigation Summary and Crop-Specific Analyses ....................................................... 24

Citrus......................................................................................................................... ........ 25

Cotton......................................................................................................................... ....... 27 Dry Bean ....................................................................................................................... .... 29

Peanut......................................................................................................................... ....... 31

Potato ......................................................................................................................... ....... 33 Soybean........................................................................................................................ ..... 35 Sugar Beet..................................................................................................................... .... 37

Sweet Potato................................................................................................................... ... 39 4. Other Labeling Requirements ....................................................................................... 41 5. Threatened and Endangered Species Considerations ................................................. 41 V. What Registrants Need to Do................................................................................................ 4 3 A. Manufacturing-Use Products .............................................................................................43 1. Additional Generic Data Requirements ........................................................................ 43 2. Labeling for Manufacturing-Use Products .................................................................. 43

### Page 4 of 191 B. End-Use Products ................................................................................................................44 1. Additional Product-Specific Data Requirements ......................................................... 44 2. Labeling for End-Use Products ..................................................................................... 44 Appendix A. Aldicarb Uses and Use- Patterns Eligible for Reregistration .........................58 Appendix B. Table of Generic Data Requi rements and Studies Used to Make the Reregistration Decision ...........................................................................................................68 Appendix C. Technical Support Documents .............................................................................75 Appendix D. Citations Considered to be Part of the Database Supporting the Reregistration Decision (Bibliography) .................................................................................77 Appendix E. Generic Data Call-In (GDCI) .........................................................................183 Appendix F. Product-Specific Data Call-In (PDCI) ...........................................................184 Appendix G. EPA’s Batching of Aldicarb Pr oducts for Meeting Data Requirements for Reregistration .........................................................................................................................185 Appendix H. List of Available Related Do cuments and Electronically Available Forms 187

### Page 5 of 191 Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision Team

EPA Office of Pesticide Programs

Special Review and Reregistration Division

Sherrie Kinard

Anne Overstreet Robert McNally

Health Effects Division

Jeff Dawson

Felicia Fort Michael Metzger Linda Taylor

Environmental Fate and Effects Division

Jonathan Angier Tom Bailey

Jeanette Martinez Dana Spatz

Biological and Economic Analysis Division

Derek Berwald Angel Chiri

Colwell Cook

Arnet Jones

Monisha Kaul Timothy Kiely

Istanbul Yusuf

Nicole Zinn

Registration Division

Joanne Edwards

John Hebert

### Page 6 of 191 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations

AGDCI Agricultural Data Call-In ai Active Ingredient aPAD Acute Population Adjusted Dose

BCF Bioconcentration Factor CFR Code of Federal Regulations cPAD Chronic Population Adjusted Dose

CSF Confidential Statement of Formulation CSFII USDA Continuing Surveys for Food Intake by Individuals

DCI Data Call-In DEEM Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model DFR Dislodgeable Foliar Residue DNT Developmental Neurotoxicity

EC Emulsifiable Concentrate Formulation EDWC Estimated Drinking Water Concentration

EEC Estimated Environmental Concentration EPA Environmental Protection Agency

EUP End-Use Product FDA Food and Drug Administration FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act FFDCA Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act FQPA Food Quality Protection Act

GLN Guideline Number

IR Index Reservoir

LC 50 

### Median Lethal Concentration. A sta tistically derived concentration of a substance that can be expected to cause death in 50% of test animals. It is usually expressed as the weight of a substance per weight or volume of water, air, or feed, e.g., mg/l, mg/kg, or ppm.

LD 50 

### Median Lethal Dose. A statistically derived single dose that can be expected to cause death in 50% of th e test animals when administered by the route indicated (oral, dermal, inhala tion). It is expressed as a weight of substance per unit weight of animal, e.g., mg/kg.

LOC Level of Concern

LOAEL Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level MATC Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration μg/g Micrograms Per Gram μg/L Micrograms Per Liter mg/kg/day Milligram Per Kilogram Per Day mg/L Milligram Per Liter MOE Margin of Exposure MRID Master Record Identification Number. EPA's system for recording and tracking studies submitted. MUP Manufacturing-Use Product

NOAEL No Observed Adverse Effect Level OPP EPA Office of Pesticide Programs

### Page 7 of 191 OPPTS EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances PAD Population Adjusted Dose PCA Percent Crop Area PDP USDA Pesticide Data Program PHED Pesticide Handler's Exposure Data

PHI Pre-harvest Interval ppb Parts Per Billion PPE Personal Protective Equipment ppm Parts Per Million

PRZM/EXAMS Pesticide Root Zone Mode/Exposure Analysis Modeling System, Tier II Surface Water Computer Model Q* The Carcinogenic Potential of a Compound, Quantified by the EPA’s

Cancer Risk Model RAC Raw Agriculture Commodity RED Reregistration Eligibility Decision REI Restricted-Entry Interval

RfD Reference Dose RQ Risk Quotient SCI-GROW2 Tier I Ground Water Computer Model SAP Science Advisory Panel SF Safety Factor SLC Single Layer Clothing TGAI Technical Grade Active Ingredient USDA United States Department of Agriculture USGS United States Geological Survey UF Uncertainty Factor

UV Ultraviolet

WPS Worker Protection Standard

### Page 8 of 191 Abstract

This document presents the Environmental Pr otection Agency’s (EPA’s or the Agency’s) decision regarding the reregistration eligibility of the registered uses of the active ingredient aldicarb. The Agency has conducted human heal th and environmental fate and effects risk

assessments for aldicarb and has assessed whethe r the aldicarb tolerances are safe from an individual-chemical standpoint (c onsidering all issues other than cumulative exposures to other n-methyl carbamate pesticides). The Agency ha s determined that, with label amendments and changes as specified in this document, aldicar b can be used without resulting in unreasonable adverse effects on the environment, and that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general U.S. population, infants, children, or other ma jor identifiable population subgroups, from the use of aldicarb (considering a ll issues other than cu mulative exposures to other n-methyl carbamate pesticides). The Ag ency has therefore determined that products containing the active ingredient aldicarb are eligible for reregistration provided that the risk mitigation measures outlined in this document ar e adopted and label amendments are made to

reflect these measures.

EPA has identified potential human health risk s of concern associated with the current registered uses of aldicarb from drinking wate r exposure, and potential environmental risks of concern to birds, mammals and fish. To reduce these potential expos ures and to address current risks of concern, the Agency, in agreement with the technical registrant of aldicarb, will implement label restrictions (increase drinking water well set-backs when certain criteria are triggered) for application to peanuts in th e southeastern coastal plains for ground water

contamination concerns. Additiona lly, application rate reductions, state limitations, application restrictions, label amendments, and termination of certain uses will also be implemented to

reduce environmental concerns. The Agency is also requiring appropriate data to confirm the decisions presented in this Rere gistration Eligibility Decision.

### Page 9 of 191 I. Introduction

The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and R odenticide Act (FIFRA) was amended in 1988 to accelerate the reregistration of products with active ingredient s registered prior to November 1, 1984. The amended Act calls for the develo pment and submission of data to support the reregistration of an active ingredient, as we ll as a review of all data submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (hereafter referred to as EPA or the Agency). Reregistration involves a thorough review of the sc ientific database underlying a pesticide’s registration. The purpose of the Agency’s review is to reassess th e potential hazards arising from the currently registered uses of a pesticide, to determin e the need for additional data on health and environmental effects, and to determine whether or not the pesticide meets the “no unreasonable

adverse effects” standard of FIFRA.

On August 3, 1996, the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) was signed into law. This Act amended FIFRA and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to require reassessment of all existing tolerances for pes ticides in food. EPA decided that, for those chemicals that have tolerances and are undergoi ng reregistration, tolerance reassessment would be accomplished through the reregistration pr ocess. Under FQPA, in reassessing these tolerances, the Agency must consider, am ong other things, aggregate risks from nonoccupational sources of pesticide exposure, wh ether there is increas ed susceptibility among infants and children, and the cumulative effects of pesticides that have a common mechanism of toxicity. In determining whethe r aldicarb tolerances can be reassessed as safe, the Agency has concluded that the risks from aggregate expos ure to aldicarb are acceptable, and that the

tolerances can be reassessed as sa fe if they are acceptable when vi ewed in light of the cumulative assessment of n-methyl carbamate pesticides.

The intentional dosing human toxicity study (the Inveresk study) used in the human

health risk assessment for aldicarb has been re viewed by EPA’s Human Studies Review Board, as required by EPA’s Human Subj ects Protections rule. The Agency presented the Inveresk study to the HSRB at a meeting on April 2 – 4, 2006. The HSRB discussed the study extensively

and concluded that the cholinesterase data from the aldicarb human study were reliable for use in the aldicarb single chemical, aggregate risk assessment from both a science and ethical standpoint. The final report of the HSRB is available at http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/files/april2006mtgfinalreport62606.pdf

Risks summarized in this document are for aldicarb only. FQPA requires EPA to consider available information concerning the cu mulative effects of a particular pesticide's

residues and "other substances that have a co mmon mechanism of toxicity" when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolera nce. Potential cumulativ e effects of chemicals with a common mechanism of toxicity are cons idered because low-level exposure to multiple chemicals causing a common toxic effect by a common mechanism could lead to the same adverse health effect as would a higher leve l of exposure to any one of these individual

chemicals. Aldicarb is a member of the N-met hyl carbamate class of pesticides. The Agency has classified the N-methyl carbamate pesticides and their common degradates as having a common mechanism of toxicity.

### Page 10 of 191 A cumulative risk assessment, which evaluates exposures based on a common mechanism of toxicity, was conducted to evaluate ri sk from food, drinking water, residential use, and other non-occupational exposur es resulting from registered uses of N-methyl carbamate pesticides, including aldicarb. EP A has concluded that the cumula tive risks associated with the N-methyl carbamate pesticides are below the Agency’s level of concern. With this determination, the Agency has concluded the reassessment process for aldicarb tolerances mandated by section 408(q) of the FFDCA. For a dditional information, refer to the document, Revised N-methyl Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment, which is available in the EPA docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0935 and on the website, http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/

.

This document presents EPA's revised human health and environmental fate and effects risk assessments, its progress toward tolerance reassessment, and the reregistration eligibility

decision for aldicarb. The document consists of six sections. Section I contains the regulatory framework for reregistration and to lerance reassessment. Section II provides a description of the chemical and a profile of the use and usage of the chemical. Section III references the revised

human health and environmental fate and effects ri sk assessments attached as Appendices to this document. Section IV presents the Agency's ri sk management, reregistration eligibility, and

tolerance reassessment decisions. Section V su mmarizes the data requirements necessary to confirm the reregistration eligibility decision as well as specific labe l changes and language necessary to implement the risk mitigation meas ures outlined in Section IV. Section VI, the Appendices, provides related information and su pporting documents. The preliminary and

revised risk assessments for aldicarb are available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 located on-line in the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at http://www.regulations.gov

.

### Page 11 of 191 II. Chemical Overview

A

. Chemical Identity

Chemical Structure: N C H 3



### H O O

N C H CH 3



### S CH 3



### CH 3



### Empirical Formula: C 7 

### H 14 

### N 2 

### O 2 

### S



### Common Name: Aldicarb

CAS Name: 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O- (methylcarbamoyl)oxime

CAS Registry Number: 116-06-3

OPP Chemical Code: 098301

Case Number: 0140

Technical Registrant: Bayer CropSciences

Degradates: Aldicarb sulfoxide: 2-Methyl-2-(m ethylsulfinyl)propionaldehyde O- (methyl carbamoyl) oxime, and Al dicarb sulfone: 2-Methyl-2- (methylsulfonyl)propionaldehyde O-(methyl carbamoyl) oxime

The regulated residues are the combined residu es of aldicarb and its two cholinesteraseinhibiting metabolites, aldi carb sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone. Aldicarb sulfoxide is considered to have similar potency to the parent in terms of toxicity, while aldicarb sulfone is less potent.

Aldicarb and the sulfoxide and su lfone metabolites are the resi dues of concern in both the tolerance expression and th e reregistration decision.

Aldicarb is registered for use as a systemic insecticide and nematicide on agricultural crops. Aldicarb is absorbed by the root system, and is subsequently tr anslocated throughout the plant. Aldicarb is a restricted use pesticide a nd there are no aldicarb produ cts intended for sale to homeowners or for use in residential settings. Aldicarb is currently sold in the United States by Bayer CropScience, the basic produce r, under the trade name of Temik ®



### .

### Page 12 of 191 B. Regulatory History

Aldicarb was first registered in 1970. Ma rketing of aldicarb was stopped in Long Island in 1980 due to high levels of aldicarb degradates found in ground water there. In 1981, aldicarb was classified as a restricted use pesticid e and in 1984 was placed under Special Review. Aldicarb is currently under Special Review because of concerns regarding ground water contamination. Position Documents (PD’s) 1 and 2/3 were published on 7/11/84 (49 FR 28320) and 6/29/88 (53 FR 24630), respectively. A Sp ecial Review Data Ca ll-In-Notice (DCI) was issued 6/3/89 requiring the registrant to s ubmit additional ground water data. In addition, because a National Food Survey identified discre pancies between anticipated residues in foods and actual residues from food survey samples, th e Special Review required a variety of studies related to use on potatoes and ci trus crops. In 1990, the sale of aldicarb on potatoes was voluntarily suspended due to det ection of tolerance-exceeding aldicarb residues on individual potatoes. The registrant agreed to dietary ri sk reduction actions invol ving voluntary cancellation of use on bananas and registration amendments fo r uses on potatoes, sweet potatoes, oranges and grapefruit. The registrant subsequently submitt ed extensive field residue and commercial storage and processing data showing that more controlled application techniques would ensure residues

below the established toleran ce and would not pose any increas ed dietary risk. The use on potatoes was re-instated in the states of FL, ID, WA and OR, after new application methods demonstrated significantly lower residues in potatoe s. Although dietary risk concerns relating to use on potatoes have been resolved, aldicarb re mains in EPA's Special Review process because of concerns about risks of ground water contamina tion. In 1998, the Agency issued a proposal as part of Special Review to manage risk s due to ground water concerns through national measures consisting of the prohibition of aldicar b use within 300 feet of a drinking water well, and geographically specific measures consisting of the requirement for State Management Plans. The Agency will begin the process to close out the Special Review of aldicarb in the near future.

C

. Use and Usage Profile

The following is information on the currently re gistered uses of aldi carb. Sections IV and V include information on those currently registered uses which are eligible for reregistration and Appendix A provides a detailed table of those us es which are eligible for reregistration.

Type of Pesticide: Aldicarb is a systemic insecticide, acaricide and nematicide used to control the following pests: a number of nematode species (suppression); leaf phyll oxera; bud moth;; aphids; mites; white flies; thrips; fleahoppers, leafminers; leafhoppers; overwintering boll weevil; lygus; cotton leaf perforat or; seedcorn maggot; Mexican bean beetle; flea beetles; Colorado pot ato beetle; greenbug; chinch bug; three cornered alfalfa hopper (s uppression); and s ugar beet root

maggot.

### Page 13 of 191 Formulations: Aldicarb is formulated and ma rketed solely as a granular pesticide under the trade name Temik®. The granulars (5, 10 and 15% a.i.)

consist of aldicarb adhered to a corn cob grit or gypsum substrate, which are formulated to produce less dust than typical clay substrates used for granular pesticides. The gypsum granular is available in closed loading systems.

Methods of Application: End-use products cont aining aldicarb are restricted use and can only be applied by a certified applicator . Typically, aldicarb is applied early in the growing season, either pre-plant, at-planting, or early post-emergent, using ground application equipment. Positive displacement application equipment and immediate so il incorporation are required. Aldicarb is also applie d as a split-season use to peanuts. It is applied as a broadcast (at-pe gging) to the can opy of the peanut plant for nematode control.

Use Sites: No aldicarb products are inte nded for sale to homeowners or for use by professional applicators in resi dential environments. Aldicarb is currently registered for use on ag ricultural crops including citrus, cotton, dry beans, peanuts, pecans, potatoes, sorghum, soybeans, sugar beets, sugarcane, sweet potat oes, and seed alfalfa (CA). In addition, aldicarb may be applied to field grown ornamentals (CA), tobacco, and on coffee grown in Puerto Rico.

Application Rates: The maximum applicatio n rates range from 1. 05 pounds (lbs) active ingredient (ai) per acre (A) for so rghum to 10.05 lbs ai/A for pecans.

Estimated Usage: Approximately 4.5 million pounds of aldicarb are used annually. Aldicarb is used mostly on cott on (approximately 64% of total aldicarb use). Other high use crops include peanuts, potatoes, sugar beets, and citrus.

D. Tolerances

Tolerances for aldicarb are expressed in term s of the combined residues of aldicarb and its cholinesterase-inhibiting metabolites aldica rb sulfoxide and aldica rb sulfone in plant, livestock, and processed food and feed commodities [40 CFR §180.269, §185.150 (a), and §186.150]. Section IV includes a summary of the tolerance rea ssessment decision for aldicarb and lists those tolerances the Agency will propose to revoke, decrease, increase, maintain, reassign, and establish.

### Page 14 of 191 III. Aldicarb Human Health and Environm ental Fate and Effects Risk Assessments

Human health effects and environmental fate and effects risk assessments have been performed for aldicarb. These assessments demo nstrate potential human h ealth risks of concern for ground water contamination in the southeaste rn coastal plains resulting from the use on peanuts, and environmental risks of concern to both terrestrial and aqua tic organisms resulting from all uses of aldicarb. A summary of poten tial risk concerns are presented below. For additional information and the risk assessments in their entirety, please refer to the revised

human health and environmental fate and effects risk assessments for aldicarb, dated February 26, 2007, and November 30, 2005, respectively. These documents are also available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 located on-line at http://www.regulations.gov

.

A. Human Health

As discussed in Section 5.2 of the human health risk assessment (found at http://www.regulations.gov./ ), there are risk estimates that exceed EPA’s level of concern from aggregate dietary exposure to re sidents living in the U.S. s outheastern coastal plain who consume water from rural ground water wells.

Four drinking water (from ground water sour ces) concentration scenarios were modeled for aldicarb: three ground water scenarios fo r use on peanuts/cotton in Georgia with an assumption of a 300 ft., 500 ft., and 1000 ft. setback, as well as an additiona l scenario in Florida

for aldicarb use on citrus w ith a 1000 ft. setback. The estimated risks at the 99.9 th 

### percentile are below the Agency’s level of concern for all f our scenarios, and for all population subgroups except for infants under the Georgia 300ft. s cenario (139% - 147% of the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD)). For all other scenario s, risk are not of concern to the Agency.

B. Environmental Fate and Effects

There are multiple lines of evidence, including studies in the open literature and registrant submitted data, clearly demonstrating that aldicarb is very highly toxic to both aquatic and terrestrial non-target organisms (e.g., a single granule of TEMIK® 15G can kill a small bird). However, the degree to which there is exposure to al dicarb or its degradates in the terr estrial and aquatic environments is much more uncertain. This is due in part to the p hysical properties (e.g., color, size, and solubility) of the aldicarb gran ule, the variety of app lication techniques, amounts applied, number of applications, application intervals, and timing of applications. Typically, the aldicarb granules are spread on the surface and incorporated into the soil by “shanking in”, “working into the soil”, “covering with soil”, and/ or “wetting in”. Applications directly “infurrow” are also performed for some crops (e .g., sweet potato), but may be followed by later applications that are less effectively soil-inco rporated. The ecological risk assessment was conducted assuming that the aldicarb granules are incorporated into the soil with efficiencies ranging from 85 to 99 percent, leaving just 1 to 15 percent of the applied granules on the soil surface available to terrestrial organisms or to runoff to surface water (resulting in exposure to aquatic organisms). Certain application techni ques, specifically, in-furrow applications and banded applications that utili ze state-of-the-art methods (suc h as positive displacement and immediate soil incorporation), may theoretically result in incorporation efficiencies of 99

### Page 15 of 191 percent. Other types of applications may result in incorporation efficiencies closer to 85 percent. Because of this uncertainty, both scenarios were a ddressed in the ecological risk assessment. In addition to this, risk quotients were calculat ed for both maximum labeled rates and typical application rates, showing the range of expected outcomes.

There are two aldicarb degradates of concer n, aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone,

that are also considered in the assessment. Th ese degradates appear to form primarily in the shallow subsurface (although some may also form within plant tissue) an d are potentially more mobile and persistent than the parent. As a conservative assumption, all three forms (parent aldicarb, sulfoxide, and sulfone) are considered as a single constituent for aquatic exposure estimates because of the longer de gradate half-lives. Parent only is considered for terrestrial exposure because of its higher toxi city to animals, the likelihood that most exposure would be to whole granules, and because only small amounts of the degradates, relative to the parent, are expected to be present directly on the surface.

Given the methods of application of the al dicarb granule (i.e., ground application and incorporation into the soil), its high wate r solubility, low vapor pressure, and low bioaccumulation potential, terrestrial exposure to al dicarb is primarily confined to the treated field. Off-site terrestrial exposur e to aldicarb would be limited to cases where, 1) a granule is redeposited to lower-lying areas affected by aldicarb runoff from nearby fields , or 2) a granule in the gut or on a prey item such as a small bird or mammal is consumed by a predator. The series of events that would need to transpire in orde r to result in off-site exposure are considered unlikely.

Summarizing the risk to terrestrial organisms, the acute risk level of concern for birds and mammals is exceeded for all target crops at bo th maximum allowed label rates and typical use rates. The levels of concern are consistently exceeded by a factor of greater than 100X and are frequently exceeded by more than 1000X. These results consider both 85 and 99 percent incorporation efficiencies. The granules left ex posed on the surface appear to be the main source of exposure, but other sources su ch as residues taken up by plants and soil invertebrates (e.g., earthworms) may also serve as a means of exposure.

The following tables (Table 1 and Table 2) pr ovide risk quotients that were calculated based on maximum labeled application rates and th e average or typical application rates taken from the Biological and Economic Analysis Di vision’s Quantitative Usage Analysis dated August 9, 2004, as well as label- indicated band widths and row sp acing. Granule incorporation efficiency was set at 85 percent (Table 1) or 99 percent incorporation (Tab le 2). Based on this information, it is evident that risk levels of con cern are exceeded even at rates that are less than the application rates allowed by the product labels and at granul e incorporation efficiencies approaching 100 percent.

### Page 16 of 191 Table 1. Ranges of acute risk quotients fo r small, medium, and large birds and mammals exposed to maximum label rate and typical app lication rates at 85% incorporation efficiency.

Crop

(max. rate/typical rate in lbs ai/acre) Maximum Rate

Avian RQs Typical Rate

Avian RQs Maximum Rate

Mammalian RQs Typical Rate

Mammalian RQs



### Citrus (4.95/3.7) 9 - 771 6 - 577 11 – 261 8 - 195

Cotton (4.05/0.6) 71 - 6396 11 - 948 93 – 2161 14 - 320

Dry Beans (2.1/1.0) 29 – 2620 13 - 1248 38 – 885 18 - 422

Peanuts (3.0/0.9) 31 - 2807 9 - 842 41 - 948 12 - 285

Pecans (10.05/3.1) 17 – 1566 5 - 483 23 – 529 7 - 163

Potatoes (3.0/2.7) 33 – 2963 30 - 2667 43 – 1001 39 - 901

Soybeans (3.0/0.7) 26 – 2339 6 - 546 34 – 790 8 - 184

Sugar beets (4.95/1.8) 32 – 2831 11 - 972 41 – 956 14 - 328

Alfalfa (3.0/NA) 5 - 451 not available 7 - 158 not available

Coffee (4.4/NA) 1 

### 246 – 22,110 not available 332 - 7738 not available

Sugarcane (3.0/NA) 50 – 4512 not available 68 – 1579 not available

Tobacco (3.0/NA) 20 – 1805 not available 27 – 632 not available

Ornamental (5.0/NA) 0.6 - 52 not available 0.8 – 18 not available

1 No incorporation assumed ba sed on product label directions.

Table 2. Ranges of acute risk quotients fo r small, medium, and large birds and mammals exposed to maximum label rate and typical app lication rates at 99% incorporation efficiency.

Crop

(max. rate/typical rate in lbs ai/acre) Maximum Rate

Avian RQs Typical Rate

Avian RQs Maximum Rate

Mammalian RQs Typical Rate

Mammalian RQs



### Citrus (4.95/3.7) 0.6 - 52 0.4 - 39 0.8 – 17 0.6 - 13

Cotton (4.05/0.6) 5 – 428 0.7 - 63 6 - 145 0.9 - 21

Dry Beans (2.1/1.0) 2 – 175 0.9 - 84 3 - 59 1 - 28

Sorghum (1.05/0.4) 2 - 193 0.8 - 73 3 - 65 1 - 25

Peanuts (3.0/0.9) 2 - 188 0.6 - 56 2.7 - 64 0.8 - 19

Pecans (10.05/3.1) 1 – 105 0.4 - 32 2 – 35 0.5 - 11

Potatoes (3.0/2.7) 2 – 198 2 - 179 3 – 67 3 - 60

Soybeans (3.0/0.7) 2 - 157 0.4 - 37 2 - 53 0.5 - 12

Sugar beets (4.95/1.8) 2 – 190 0.7 - 65 3 - 64 0.9 - 22

Sweet potatoes (3.0/1.4) 1 – 125 0.7 - 58 2 – 42 0.8 - 20

Ornamental (5.0/NA) 0.6 - 52 not available 0.8 – 18 not available

### Page 17 of 191 The potential for mortality to birds has been an area of initial focus, given aldicarb’s mode of action and very high acute toxicity. Chroni c risk to birds has not yet been quantitatively assessed. However, based on inference from mammalian data, which involved comparing magnitudes of LD 50 

### s between the mallard duck (1.0 mg/kg- bw) and rat (0.9 mg/kg-bw) and then using this information together with the chronic information available for the laboratory rat (reproductive NOAEL = 0.7 – 0.9 mg/kg-bw), the Agency expects that birds (as well as mammals) that survive acute exposure to aldi carb may suffer adverse reproductive (chronic) effects. The Agency is requesting add itional data to confirm this hypothesis.

While there are some exceedences of acute le vels of concern for aquatic species, risk from chronic exposure to aldicarb and its degradat es appears to be more significant. The chronic

level of concern is exceeded for several uses at maximum application rates and 99 percent incorporation efficiency for freshwater fish and i nvertebrates, as well as for estuarine/marine fish and invertebrates. However, unde r typical application rates, thes e risks for the most part are mitigated. In addition to risk based on exposur e estimates from aquatic exposure modeling, there were also exceedences of the Agency levels of concern based on EECs derived from monitoring

data.

There have been 29 incidents related to aldi carb reported in the Environmental Incident Information System database (reported to the Ag ency from 1988 to 2005). Of these 29 incidents, 16 were from misuse, 11 were of undetermined us e, and 2 were registered agricultural uses. Approximately 17 of the 29 incidents reported incl uded bird kills. Fourte en bird kill incidents were from intentional misuse, and 3 were of unde termined use. Eight of these incidents also resulted in mammal kills (all misuse or undetermined use).

When evaluating incident data, it is important to note that currently, no systematic or

reliable mechanism exists for the accurate monitori ng and reporting of wildlife kill incidents to the Agency. Moreover, before a pesticide incide nt can be reported or investigated, the dead

animals must first be found. In the absence of monitoring following pesticide applications, kills are not likely to be noticed in agro-environments which are generally away form human activity. It is likely that poisoned birds may fly from the use sites, succumbing outside of the area or scavengers may remove carcasses before they ca n be observed, significantly reducing the chance

of detection.

### Page 18 of 191 IV. Risk Management, Reregistration, and Tolerance Reassessment Decisions

A. Determination of Reregistration Eligibility

Section 4(g)(2)(A) of FIFRA calls for the Agency to determine, after submission of relevant data concerning an active ingredient , whether or not products containing the active ingredient are eligible for reregistration. The Agency has previously identified and required the submission of the generic (technical grade) data required to support rere gistration of products containing aldicarb as an active ingredient. The Agency has completed its review of these generic data, and has determined that the data are sufficient to suppor t reregistration of all products containing aldicarb provided the registra tions are amended in a manner consistent with

this document.

The Agency has completed its review of su bmitted data and its assessment of the dietary (both food and drinking water), o ccupational, and ecologi cal risks associated with the use of pesticide products containing the active ingredie nt aldicarb. Based on these data and public comments received on the Agency's assessments fo r the active ingredient aldicarb, the Agency

has sufficient information on the human health a nd ecological effects of aldicarb to make a decision as part of the tolera nce reassessment process under FFDCA and reregistration process under FIFRA, as amended by FQPA.

Based on its evaluation of aldi carb, the Agency has determined that products containing the active ingredient aldicarb, unless labeled a nd used as specified in this document, would present risks inconsistent with FIFRA and FFDCA. Accordingly, should a registrant fail to implement any of the risk mitigation measures id entified in this document, the Agency may take appropriate regulatory action to addr ess the risk concerns from the use of aldicarb. If all changes outlined in this document are incorporated into the product labels, then all current risks for aldicarb will be adequately addressed for the pur poses of this determination under FIFRA. Once a comprehensive endangered species assessment is completed, further changes to these registrations may be necessary as explained in Section IV.D.4 of this document below.

B. Public Comments and Responses

Through the Agency's public participation pr ocess, EPA worked with stakeholders and the public to reach these regulatory decisions fo r aldicarb. The Phase 3 public comment period on the risk assessments, opened on May 17, 2006, and the Phase 5 public comment period on the risk assessments and solicitation for additional input to use/usage opened on November 14, 2006. The Agency received comments from several stak eholders (including stakeholders from public interest groups), and the techni cal registrant, Bayer CropScience. A complete listing of these

comments can be found at http://www.regulations.gov./

These comments were reviewed and taken into consideration in preparing the revised risk assessments and their supporting documents, incl uding this aldicarb RED. The comments are available in their entirety in the publi c docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 located on-line at http://www.regulations.gov./ . The Agency's responses to subs tantive comments are available in

### Page 19 of 191 memoranda in the public docket and the revised assessments available in the public docket reflect these responses.

C. Regulatory Position

1. Food Quality Protection Act Findings

a. “Risk Cup” Determination

As part of the FQPA tolerance reassessmen t process, EPA assessed the risks associated with aldicarb. The Agency has concluded that, w ith the risk mitigation measures outlined in this document, the aggregate risk from food and drin king water exposures to aldicarb is within its own “risk cup.” The Agency has determined that the human health risks from these combined exposures are within acceptable levels and that, considering every issue other than the cumulative impacts of exposure to other n-met hyl carbamate pesticides, the established tolerances for aldicarb, with label amendments a nd changes as specified in this document, meet the safety standards under the FQPA amendmen ts to Section 408(b)(2 )(C) and 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA. In reaching these determinations, EPA has considered the available information on the special sensitivity of infants and children.

b. Determination of Safety to U.S. Population (Including Infants and Children)

The Agency has determined that there is a r easonable certainty that no harm will result to the general U.S. population, infants, children, or other major identifiable subgroups of consumers, from the use of aldicarb. The safety determination considers factors such as the toxicity, use practices and expos ure scenarios, and environmenta l behavior of aldicarb. In determining whether or not infants and children are particularly susceptible to toxic effects from exposure to residues of aldicarb, the Agency considered the comple teness of the hazard database for developmental and reproductive effects, th e nature of the effects observed, and other

information.

The Agency determined it was necessary to reta in a 2X FQPA database uncertainty factor

for aldicarb residues in the diet ary human health risk assessment because magnitude of the brain cholinesterase inhibition was approximately 2-fo ld greater in the young rat compared to the adult rat at similar acute doses. For specific inform ation relating to the Agency’s decision on the FQPA factor, refer to secti on 3.4 in the February 26, 2007 Human Health Revised Risk

Assessment found at http://www.regulations.gov./

c. Endocrine Disruptor Effects

EPA is required under the FFDCA, as ame nded by FQPA, to develop a screening program to determine whether certain substanc es (including all pes ticide active and other ingredients) “may have an effect in humans that is sim ilar to an effect produced by a naturally occurring estrogen, or other such endocrine e ffects as the Administrator may designate.” Following the recommendations of its Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory

### Page 20 of 191 Committee (EDSTAC), EPA determined that there were scientific bases for including, as part of the program, androgen and thyroid hormone syst ems, in addition to the estrogen hormone system. EPA also adopted EDSTAC’s recommenda tion that the Program include evaluations of potential effects in wildlife. When the appropr iate screening and/or testing protocols being considered under the Agency’s Endocrine Disrupter Screening Program (EDSP) have been developed and vetted, aldicarb may be subjected to additional screening and/or testing to better characterize possible effects rela ted to endocrine disruption.

d. Cumulative Risks

FFDCA Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) requires that the Agency consider “available information” concerning cumulative effects of a particular pesticides residues and “other

substances that have a common mechanism of toxi city” when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance for pesticide residu es in food. EPA considers cumulative effects from pesticides and other substances because low-level exposures to multiple chemical substances causing a common effect by a common mechanism could lead to the same adverse health effect as would a higher level of exposure to each individual substance.

Aldicarb is a member of the N-methyl carba mate class of pesticides, which share a common mechanism of toxicity by affecting the ner vous system via cholinesterase inhibition. A cumulative risk assessment, which evaluates exposures based on a common mechanism of toxicity, was conducted to evaluate risk from food, drinking wate r, residential use, and other non-occupational exposures resulting from register ed uses of N-methyl carbamate pesticides, including aldicarb. EPA has conc luded that the cumulative risks associated with the N-methyl carbamate pesticides are below the Agency’s level of concern. For additional information, refer to the document, Revised N-methyl Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment, which is available in the EPA docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0935 and on the website, http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/

.

2. Tolerance Summary

The tolerance summary and tolerance reassessm ent decision is presented for aldicarb in Table 3 below. Currently there are forty to lerances listed in 40 CFR §180.269, 40 CFR §185.150, and 40 CFR §186.150 for residues of aldi carb on raw and agricultural commodities

and livestock commodities.

The available aldicarb residue chemistry data are considered adequate to reassess most tolerances. The Agency will propose establishing a citrus fruit crop group tolerance of 0.3 ppm.

Some commodities with established tolerances must be revised to reflect the correct commodity definition. Additional data are need ed to determine appropriate tolerances for

residues in/on cott onseed and cotton gin by-products.

### Page 21 of 191 Table 3. Tolerance Reassessment Summary for Aldicarb and Aldicarb Sulfone and

Aldicarb Sulfoxide

.

Commodity Current

Tolerance

(ppm) Tolerance

Reassessment (ppm) Comment/ [Correct Commodity Definition]

Tolerances Listed Un der 40 CFR 180.269:

Beans, dry, seed 0.1 0.1 [ bean, dry, seed ]

Beets, sugar, roots 0.05 0.05 [ beet, sugar, roots ]

Beets, sugar, tops 1 1 [ beet, sugar, tops ]

Citrus pulp, dried 0.6 Revoke Commodity covered by the raw agricultural commodity tolerance.

Coffee bean, green 0.1 0.1 [ coffee, green bean ] Registrant has requested that the domestic use on coffee be voluntarily cancelled. A tolerance should be maintained for import purposes only.

Cotton, undelinted seed 0.1 0.1 [ cotton, undelinted seed ]

Cottonseed, hulls 0.3 Revoke Commodity covered by the raw agricultural commodity tolerance.

Grapefruit 0.3 0.3

Lemon 0.3 0.3

Lime 0.3 0.3

Orange, sweet 0.3 0.3 The registrant has proposed a crop group tolerance of 0.3 ppm for fruit, citrus, group

10.

Peanut 0.05 0.05

Pecan 0.5 0.5 Registrant has requested that the domestic use on pecan be voluntarily cancelled. A tolerance should be maintained for import purposes only.

Potato 1 0.2 The available data reflecting the supported use pattern indicate the established tolerance

should be reduced.

Sorghum, grain 0.2 Revoke

Sorghum, grain, bran 0.5 Revoke

Sorghum, grain, stover 0.5 Revoke Registrant has requested that the domestic use on sorghum be voluntarily cancelled. A tolerance should be maintained for import purposes only.

Soybean 0.02 0.02 soybean, seed

Sugarcane, cane 0.02 0.02 Registrant has requested that the domestic use on sugarcane be voluntarily cancelled. A tolerance should be maintained for import purposes only.

Sugarcane, fodder 0.1 Revoke

Sugarcane, forage 0.1 Revoke These commodities are not considered to be significant livestock feed items.

Sweet potato, roots 0.1 0.1 sweet potato, root Required Tolerances to be Listed Under 40 CFR §180.269

Cotton, gin byproducts -- TBD a

Tolerances to be Established

Barley, hay - 3.0

Barley, grain - 0.02 Rotational crop tolerances recommended by

HED.

### Page 22 of 191 Commodity Current

Tolerance

(ppm) Tolerance

Reassessment (ppm) Comment/ [Correct Commodity Definition]

Barley, straw - 0.1

Wheat, forage - 1.0

Wheat, grain - 0.02

Wheat, straw - 0.1

Wheat, hay - 3.0

a Data depicting the magnitude of aldicarb residues of concern in cotton gin byproducts are required in accordance

with Table 1 of OPPTS Series 860 Resi due Chemistry Test Guidelines, 8/96.



### D. Regulatory Rationale

The Agency has determined that products containing the active ingredient aldicarb are eligible for reregistration provided that the risk mitigation measures outlined in this document are adopted and label amendments are made to reflect these measures. The following is a summary of the risk mitigation measures and EPA’s rationale for the decision for managing risks

associated with the use of aldicarb. Where la beling revisions are warranted, label changes and language are specified in Section V.

1. Human Health Risk Management and Mitigation

a. Dietary Risk Miti gation (Drinking Water)

As discussed in Section 5.2 of the human health risk assessment (found at http://www.regulations.gov./ ), there are risk estimates that exceed EPA’s level of concern from aggregate dietary exposure to re sidents living in the U.S. s outheastern coastal plain who consume water from rural ground water wells in specific vulnerable areas.

Four ground water scenarios were modeled for aldicarb. The estimated risks at the 99.9 th



### percentile are below the Agency’s level of concern for all four s cenarios, and for all population subgroups except for infants under the Georgia 300 feet peanut scenario. For all other scenarios, risk are not of concern to the Agency.

Therefore, in order to mitigate potential drinking water concerns in the peanut growing regions in the states of Georgia, Alabama, S outh Carolina, and Florida, an increased well setback from 300 to 500 feet is required for wells no t encased to a depth of 100 feet in vulnerable soils, and a shallow depth to groun d water (less than 25 feet).

The determination for this buffer was base d upon both monitoring data and modeling. The Agency utilized the Natural Resource C onservation Service’s (N RCS) criteria for high leaching potential soils for Florida and encourages the technical registrant, Bayer CropScience to use the same criteria when determining vulnerable soils for other states. The Agency’s review of “A Retrospective Ground Water Monitoring Stu dy for Aldicarb and Its Metabolites in the Southeastern United States; Mississippi Delta; Te xas; California; and Pacific Northwest”, dated

### Page 23 of 191 July 24, 2007, and found at http://www.regulations.gov./ contains the reference to the NRCS

criteria.

b. Aggregate Risk Mitigation

As previously discussed, food and drinki ng water are below the Agency’s level of concern with the mitigation for ground water in th e Southeastern states of Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida. There are no re sidential exposures, th erefore, no additional mitigation is needed to address aggregate risk. Label changes and language necessary for reregistration are specified in Table 5 in Section V.

c. Occupational Risk Mitigation

As discussed in Section 10 of the human h ealth risk assessment there are no risks of concern to workers performing tasks such as mi xing, loading, and applying, based on current labeling. Moreover, since aldicarb is applied to soil when little fo liage is present, there are no reentry risks, given the current Restricted-Entry Intervals (REIs). Therefore, no additional mitigation is necessary.

2. Ecological Risk Man agement and Mitigation

As discussed in the environmental fate a nd effects risk assess ment, ecological risks (direct adverse acute effects) to non-target aquatic and terrestrial organisms are of concern from the use of aldicarb. Additionally, there are chroni c risks to aquatic invertebrates (freshwater and estuarine/marine) and freshwater fish. Aldicar b is also a po tential ground water, and possibly surface water, contaminant. The ecological risk assessments exhibit RQ values which exceed the various target levels of concern. Risks are mu ch higher, as evidenced by higher RQ values, for terrestrial organisms, especially to birds. In addition to the mitigation outlined below, the Agency intends to require additiona l confirmatory data which are listed in Table 4 of Section V.

a. Terrestrial and Aquatic Organisms

Terrestrial The Agency’s assessment suggests the potential for acute effects to terrestrial organisms for all application scenarios. Aldicarb is highly toxic to birds, mammals, honeybees, and earthworms; however, due to aldicarb’s granular formulation and, in most cases, immediate incorporation into the soil, risks from exposure ( undissolved granules left on the surface) to birds and mammals are lessened. In summary, the Agency is concerned with all use patterns for acute effects to birds and mammals. As appropria te under FIFRA, the Agency has weighed the potential risk with the expected benefits of continued use. These conclusions are presented

below.

Aquatic The Agency’s assessment also suggests th e potential for adverse effects to aquatic

invertebrates and fish. Adverse effects include reduced survival and reduced reproduction when exposed to aldicarb and/or its metabolites (ald icarb sulfoxide, aldicarb su lfone) as a result of

### Page 24 of 191 labeled use. Aquatic plants ar e also subject to adverse effect s (reduced survival) when exposed

to aldicarb and/or its metabolites (aldicarb sulfoxide, aldi carb sulfone) as a result of labeled use.

For potential risk to aquatic species, the chro nic level of concern is exceeded for several uses at maximum application rates and 99 percent incorporation efficiency for freshwater fish and invertebrates, as well as fo r estuarine/marine fish and invert ebrates. However, under typical application rates, these risks for the most part are mitigated. Direct application of aldicarb to streams, lakes, and ponds is forbidden by pr oduct labels; however, following a rain event, aldicarb may reach aquatic environments from ar eas of application in sheet and channel-flow runoff, because aldicarb is moderately persistent in terrestrial environments and soluble in water. It is unlikely that aquatic organisms will be di rectly exposed to granules, both because of the highly soluble nature of the compound (whole granul es will dissolve rather than be transported intact) and because of the application methods (d irectly onto field). Aquatic organisms could also be exposed to aldicarb residues and degrad ates from ground water that is subsequently discharged into a surface water body.

3. Mitigation Summary and Crop-Specific Analyses

The Agency has worked with the technical registrant, Bayer Cr opScience, to reduce potential exposure of aldicarb to wildlife and aquatic life. Subs equently, Bayer has agreed to voluntarily cancel all current regist rations on the following crops:

• Coffee

• Ornamentals

• Pecans

• Sugarcane

• Sorghum

• Tobacco

• Alfalfa grown for seed

These proposals for cancellati on will be announced in the Federal Register (FR). A subsequent FR Notice will finalize the cancellation absent significant comment to change the Agency’s position. As part of the Agency’s mitigation plan, labels will be amended shortly to

remove these uses.

To further reduce ecological concerns, the Agen cy has determined that the label changes (as specified in Table 5 in Section V), as agreed upon by the technical registrant Bayer CropScience, and discussed with stakeholders fo r specific scenarios and crops, are appropriate and required for reregistration eligibility. Listed below are the specific crop use sites/patterns for aldicarb along with corresponding RQs of concer n for birds and mammals, stakeholder input on use, alternatives/benefits, mitigation, and EPA’s decision regarding reregistration eligibility. As a general matter, the Agency has determined that although there is potential for harm to wildlife because of use of aldicarb, that harm will gene rally be limited in time and space. The Agency

also determined that these risks are often out weighed by the benefits expected from use of aldicarb instead of existing alternatives. The Ag ency was also mindful in this analysis that aldicarb does not pose risks of concerns to pesticid e applicators or to farm workers generally.

### Page 25 of 191 

## Citrus

Current Use Pattern

Aldicarb is used on citrus in Florida and Texa s only. Application currently consists of a side-dress application and is usually applied along the side of the tree row in furrow and immediately covered with soil. The maximum applic ation rate for use on ci trus is currently 4.95 lbs ai/A. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is ap plied to citrus (2 inches in depth), the Agency

has assumed that 85% of the aldi carb applied is cove red with soil, and that 15% may remain on the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Because of acute toxicity and ground water contamination concerns, anyone who applies aldicarb in Florida is required to obtain a perm it from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for each application to be made. This permitting process involves the collaborative efforts of the registrant, state offici als and growers to ensure that every application of aldicarb is permitted and recorded. For a dditional information on the aldicarb permitting system in Florida’s State Division of Agri cultural Environmental Services, please see http://www.flaes.org/temik/

.

Risks of Concern Assuming 85% Soil Incorporation RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 9 to 771. RQs modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 6 to 577. RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 11 to 261. RQs modele d for mammals using typi cal rates range from 8 to 195. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to a quatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement/Input on Citrus During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Particip ation Process, in addition to the written comments received from respondents as listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency met with and received comments from Bayer CropScience, th e Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS), Florida Fruit a nd Vegetable Association (FFVA), USDA, and many other interested stakeholders with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on citrus. These stakeholders have provided additional information regarding aldicarb usage (application methods and rates) and the use of aldicarb in citrus production. In particular, these stakeholders noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant grow th, resulting in increased yields when used on

citrus. Subsequent meetings, site visits and teleco nference calls with Bayer, FDACS, and FFVA have led to the Agency’s understanding of the aldicarb permitting process in Florida.

Alternatives and Benefits

Aldicarb is a recommended insecticide for mites, the Asian Citrus Psyllid (AsCP), and nematode control. Citrus greening is a severe vascular disease transmitted by the Asian citrus psyllid. The psyllid is a relatively new pest that now ranges throughout all the citrus producing areas in Florida and Texas. Greening is a disease that slowly weakens and kills all types of citrus trees, and causes fruit to become lopsided and taste bitter. No cure exists for a tree that contracts the disease. As of 2006, greeni ng had been found in more than 440 different locations in at least

### Page 26 of 191 11 Florida counties. Although the AsCP has been found in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, citrus greening has not been found there at this time.

There are several alternatives to aldicarb for control of mites, but there appears to be no

feasible alternative to aldicarb fo r nematode control. Estimated yield losses in Florida without aldicarb are 5 to 10 percent, which corresponds to an annual loss of about $4.6 to $9.3 million for oranges and grapefruit combined. There are no alternatives for control of AsCP, the vector for citrus greening.

For nematode control specifically, aldicarb is used to control the citrus and burrowing nematodes although it does not effectively cont rol the burrowing nematode as aldicarb only remains in the shallow part of the root zone. Other nematodes with limited economic importance in Florida are the sting nematode and lesion nematode.

EPA’s analysis concludes that the absen ce of aldicarb for use on citrus acreage for controlling both nematodes and other insects can re sult in yield losses of 5 to 10 percent. Therefore, the cost to growers will be quite high. A 5 to 10 percent yield loss to the “average” grower in Florida corresponds to a $97 to $193 in lost revenue per acre. For the grapefruit grower, a 5 to 10 percent yield loss corresponds to a loss in revenue of $109 to $218 per acre. If the loss to nematodes increased over time, as nematode populations increase, these losses may get worse. The 2000/2001 – 2004/2005 value of ora nge production in Florida was about $1.1 billion and the value of grapefruit producti on was approximately $209 million. A 10 percent reduction on the 7 percent of acreage treated with aldicarb would result in a loss of approximately $3.9 to $7.8 million annually to Fl orida orange growers, and $0.7 to $1.5 million to Florida grapefruit growers.

For additional information, refer to the Agency ’s complete alternative/quantitative impact memo for citrus and the BEAD response to Ph ase 3 comments for citrus, cotton and pecans which are available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located on-line at http://www.regulations.gov/

.

Mitigation To reduce potential ecological risks, the Agency, in agreement with the technical registrant of aldicarb, has developed several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

• Label clarifications to specify application of granules in 3 to 6 furro ws beside individual trees, that are 2 inches deep and spaced on approximately 12 inch centers, immediately covering with soil.

• Label modifications to help reduce the amount of aldicarb left on the surface of the soil making it less available for the wildlife potenti ally at risk. For specific label language, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of aldica rb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility)

### Page 27 of 191 and how aldicarb is soil incorpor ated, actual exposure of poten tially affected populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overe stimated. Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the treated fields wh ere wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expe cted to be limited. The Agency recognizes, however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

Additionally, the Agency also acknowledge s that, although risks were calculated assuming 85% soil incorporation, actual aldicarb granules availa ble on or just under the soil’s surface for potential consumption by birds or mammals is unlikely, given the methods of application including positive displacement (mechani zed placement of granules beneath the soil)

and lock-and-load containers which minimi ze potential spillage of product.

The Agency has determined that there are be nefits of aldicarb use on citrus and, as quantified above, losing its use would involve additional costs to growers. Aldicarb has advantages to citrus growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the le vel of control in the face of une xpected infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of control.

Aldicarb provides control against insects, including nematodes, in portions of citrus production areas. Because of its long residual activity, in many cases growers can apply one treatment of aldicarb, rather than multiple treat ments of other chemicals for equivalent insect control. Also, potential worker risks from mu ltiple foliar applications of these alternative products are not insignificant. Therefore, the use on citrus is eligib le for reregistration.



## Cotton

Current Use Pattern Aldicarb is used on cotton primarily for contro l of thrips, although it co ntrols other insect pests. In addition, there is also evidence of aldicarb use to control nematodes on cotton. Aldicarb is applied at-plant or as a side-dress application. The at planting application is

administered in the furrow with the cotton seed and immediately covered w ith soil. Greater than 97% of the use on cotton is this at-plant applic ation. The side-dress application is usually administered after the cotton has emerged from the soil and is applied along the side of the plant row (8 inches from the plants, two or three inch es deep) in furrow and immediately covered with soil. The maximum application rate for use on cotton is currently 4.05 lbs ai/A. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is app lied to cotton (at a depth greater than 2 inches), the Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is cove red with soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 5 to 428. RQs modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.7 to 63. RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 6 to 145. RQs modele d for mammals using typi cal rates range from 0.9 to 21. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to a quatic invertebrates and fish.

### Page 28 of 191 Stakeholder Involvement /Input on Cotton During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Particip ation Process, in addition to the written comments received from respondents as listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency met with and received comments from Bayer, the Nationa l Cotton Council of America, Cotton Growers Association, Georgia Cotton Commission, USDA, as well as many other inte rested stakeholders with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on cotton. In particular, these stakeholders noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant grow th, resulting in increased yields when used on

cotton.

Alternatives and Benefits The Agency acknowledges that the use of aldicarb has benefits to cotton growers. Although thrips and other insects are targeted, aldicarb is applied to cotton in Texas and the

Southeast to control nematodes as well. Based on EPA proprietary data, an annual average of about 1.4 million acre treatments (about 38% of total applications) of aldicarb have targeted

nematodes between 2002 and 2006. The state with the most acre treatments against nematodes is Georgia, with an annual average of about 360,000 acres, followed by Texas (about 270,000 acres annually) and North Carolina (a bout 200,000 acres annually).

For thrip control, no one chemical could repl ace aldicarb, but a combination of chemicals could be used effectively. This combination for insect control was more expensive than aldicarb: the Agency estimates that chemical costs alone would be about $2 per acre higher in Mississippi and $22 per acre higher in California. These ch emicals also do not share the advantages of aldicarb which are a longer period of effectiveness and control over multiple pests, including nematodes. If nematodes are considered a target pest, as they are in Texas and the Southeast, growers have fewer alternatives to aldicarb. The best control for nematodes would be 1,3- dichloropropene (1,3-D). The additional cost fo r replacing aldicarb with 1,3-D, along with the combination of chemicals to provi de control of thrips is about $38 per acre. Of that figure, $36 per acre is based on the chemical cost of 1,3-D. If it were assumed that these acres were treated with 1,3-D instead, the additional costs are over $50 million annually.

For additional information, refer to the Agency ’s complete alternative/quantitative impact

memo for cotton which is available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located

on-line at http://www.regulations.gov/

.

Mitigation To reduce potential ecological risks, the Ag ency has directed, and the registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

• At-plant application rate will be reduced to a maximum of 1.5 lbs ai/A. This equates to a 63% reduction in rate as comp ared to the current label.

• 

### Side-dress application rate wi ll be reduced to 2.1 lbs ai/A. This equates to a 30% reduction as compared to the current label.

• 

### Per-season application rate is limited to 3.6 lb s ai/A. This equates to a 63% reduction as compared to the current label.

### Page 29 of 191 • 

### Label specifications to clarify the depth at which aldicarb is applied. Additionally, modifications in label language to help redu ce the amount of aldicarb left on the surface of the soil, making it less avai lable for wildlife potentially at risk. For specific label language, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of aldica rb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how aldicarb is soil incorpor ated, actual exposure of poten tially affected populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overe stimated. Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the treated fields wh ere wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expe cted to be limited. The Agency recognizes, however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

The Agency has determined that there are be nefits of aldicarb use on cotton and, as specified above, losing its use would involve additio nal costs to growers, some of which can be quantified directly. Aldicarb has advantages to cotton growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management, c onfidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and

duration of control.

Aldicarb provides control of insects, in cluding nematodes, in portions of cotton production areas. Alternative pesticides, which can be used to control insect pests (e.g., thrips), are not effective in controlling multiple pests. Aldicarb also provide s protection for a longer period of time than any of the alternatives. As stated above, because of its long residual activity, in many cases growers can apply one treatment of aldicarb, rather than multiple treatments of other chemicals for equivalent insect control. Also, potential worker risks from multiple foliar applications of these alternativ e products are not insignificant. Therefore, the use on cotton is eligible for reregistration.



## Dry Bean

Current Use Pattern Aldicarb application to dry bean s currently consist of an at-p lant application. The atplanting application is administered in the fu rrow with the dry bean seed and immediately covered with soil at a depth greater than 2 inch es. The maximum application rate for use on dry bean is currently 2.1 lbs ai/A. Due to the natu re of how aldicarb is applied to dry bean, the Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb ap plied is covered with so il and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 175. RQs modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.9 to 84. RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 3 to 59. RQs modele d for mammals using typi cal rates range from 1

### Page 30 of 191 to 28. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement/Input for Dry Bean During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Particip ation Process, in addition to the written comments from respondents as listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer CropScience, USDA, as well as many other interested stakeholders with specific knowledge rela ting to aldicarb use on dry bean.

Alternatives and Benefits The Agency understands that aldicarb use on dry bean is of benefit to dry bean growers in the states of Idaho, Michigan, Oregon and Washi ngton. Aldicarb use in dry bean production is a valuable tool for controlling aphids, leafhoppers, the Mexican bean beetle, and several species of

nematodes. There are both foliar and seed treat ment alternatives, such as thiamethoxam, but only aldicarb provides season long control at planti ng, and growers do not have to spray multiple times. In Michigan, aldicarb is also used to control the root-lesion nematode, which can cause 10% yield reduction and is present in 50% of the dry bean acreage if left uncontrolled. On the acreage with nematodes that is not tr eated, growers expect lower yields.

As with other crops, the main value of aldicarb as an insecticide is that a single at-plant treatment will protect the seedling and young plant for several weeks from attack by nematodes and several insect pests, some of which are vector s of plant viruses. Although alternatives (such as esfenvalerate, dimethoate, propargite, and others) exist for use against all insect pests controlled by aldicarb, it would likely take at least two applications of foliar insecticides to provide the same level of protection afforded by an at-plant aldicarb treatment. Where nematodes are also a problem, it would also take a pre-plant application with a soil fumigant, such as 1,3-D. While aldicarb alternatives exis t, the Agency believes that the economic impact on dry bean growers of shifting to such alternatives for nematode control are likely to be cost prohibitive, in which case the likely result of lo ss of aldicarb would be th at growers would face a financial penalty from reduced yield because of nematodes.

Mitigation To reduce potential ecological risks, the Ag ency has directed, and the registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

• Geographically restricting th e use to Idaho, Michigan, Oregon, and Washington.

• Modifications in label language to help reduc e the amount of aldicarb left on the surface of the soil, thereby making it less available for wildlife potentially at risk. For the label language modifications, please refe r to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of aldica rb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how aldicarb is soil incorpor ated, actual exposure of poten tially affected populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overe stimated. Potential risks to birds and mammals

### Page 31 of 191 would be limited primarily to the treated fields wh ere wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expe cted to be limited. The Agency recognizes, however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

The Agency has determined that there are bene fits of aldicarb use on dry bean and that losing its use would involve additional costs to gr owers. Aldicarb has advantages to dry bean growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar va lues, such as simplicity of management,

confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of control. Therefore, the use on dry bean is eligible for reregistration.



## Peanut

Current Use Pattern Aldicarb is applied when peanuts are planted, or can be used as a split treatment, where aldicarb is applied at-plant and also applied later in the season when the plants are forming pegs, which develop into peanuts. This application is referred to as “at-pegging”. Aldicarb is generally used to control nematodes and thrips on peanuts, primarily in the southern States, as well for the suppression of leafhoppe rs and spider mites. To be tter understand the potential risk and resulting mitigation, these two use patt erns are discussed in more detail below.

At Planting Aldicarb is applied to peanuts at planting for protection agains t thrips and several species of nematodes (e.g. root-knot, lesion, stubby root, sting). For thrips co ntrol the granules are applied in the seed furrow and then covered with soil. The peanut seed is then planted into the treated zone. When used for nematode control, aldicarb granules are applied in a 6 to 12 inch band over an open furrow and covered with soil to a depth of 2 to 4 inches. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied to peanut s at planting (at a depth greater than 2 inches), the Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is cove red with soil and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern for the At-Plant Applica tion Method Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 188. RQs modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.6 to 56. RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 2.7 to 64. RQs mode led for mammals using t ypical rates range from 0.8 to 19. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to a quatic invertebrates and fish.

At Pegging Aldicarb can also be applied later in the season when the plants are forming pegs (atpegging), which develop into peanuts. In this cas e, aldicarb is typically applied at the initiation of pegging, in a 12 to 18 inch band over the p eanut row. Unlike ot her aldicarb application practices, soil incorporat ion does not occur because the plant has already formed pegs (which develop into peanuts) just under the surface of th e soil. Attempts to incorporate the granules would damage the roots of the plants and any pegs that have formed. Due to the nature of how

### Page 32 of 191 aldicarb is applied to peanuts at pegging (with out any mechanical means of soil incorporation), the Agency has assumed that 100% of the aldica rb applied remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern for the At-Pegging Application Method RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 31 to 2,807. RQs modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 9 to 842. RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 41 to 948. RQs modele d for mammals using typi cal rates range from 12 to 285. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to a quatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement/Input for Peanuts During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Particip ation Process, in addition to the written comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, the National Peanut Boar d, Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association, Florida Department of Agriculture and Cons umer Services, USDA, and other interested stakeholders with specific knowledge rela ting to aldicarb use on peanuts.

Alternatives and Benefits For the at-plant use of aldicarb, early seas on control of nematodes may be achieved with a pre-plant soil fumigation with 1,3-D; however, it would require one or mo re other insecticides (primarily ethoprop) to address other pests. Theref ore, for the at-plant us e of aldicarb, there are

no chemical or non-chemical alternatives that can provide both insect and nematode control on peanuts during the first month after plant emergence.

For the at-pegging use of aldicarb, multiple treatments of the alternatives may be required, and none of those alternatives also cont rol nematodes. Because of aldicarb’s ability to control both nematodes and insect pests, alterna tives to aldicarb will consist of at least one insecticide application for thrips control and one nematicide application in areas where both pests exist.

Based upon data reviewed by the Agency, w ithholding the at-pegging aldicarb treatment caused a yield decrease of 56%. Applying this lo ss to dollars per acre, it is estimated that without the aldicarb at-pegging use, reve nues would fall from $290 to $227 per acre.

Another important factor considered by the Ag ency was that nematode damage to peanut plants does not stop with yield da mage, but also causes damage to th e peanuts that are harvested. The Agency is aware that, poten tially, this damage could corr espond to a discount of about 10 cents per pound. Therefore, revenue loss from re duced quality could be as high as losses from reduced yields.

In conclusion, without aldicarb, costs to gr owers from the yield losses due to nematode damage alone are estimated to exceed $15 million a year in Georgia, and up to $22 million a year

nationwide. It is clear to the Agency that without the use of al dicarb there would be substantial costs to growers who are currently using aldica rb approximately 30-45 days after plant (atpegging); up to $300 per acre base d upon data from field trials performed in Georgia.

### Page 33 of 191 For additional information, refer to the Agency ’s complete alternative/quantitative impact memo for peanuts which is available in th e public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located

on-line at http://www.regulations.gov/

.

Mitigation To reduce potential ecological risks, the Ag ency has directed, and the registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

• For the split-season, at-pegging use of aldicar b, application must be made late in the afternoon or early evening and immediately fo llowed by irrigation, and completed within 24 hours which will help dissolve granules thereby making them una vailable for wildlife.

• Label clarifications for post-emergent use: apply granules in a band 12 to 18 inches wide on the row and into the plant canopy. Ensure that plant foliage is dry pr ior to application. Dislodge granules from foliage by suitable means that will not damage the plant.

• Label clarifications to ensure that at-pla nting applications are done over an open furrow which is 4 to 6 inches in width, known as “T-band” applications.

• For the specific label language for the appl ication modifications, please refer to Table 5

in Section V.

EPA Decision Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of aldica rb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how aldicarb is soil incorpor ated, actual exposure of poten tially affected populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overe stimated. Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the treated fields wh ere wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expe cted to be limited. The Agency recognizes, however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

The Agency has determined that there are bene fits of aldicarb use on peanut (both the atplanting and at-pegging use) and that losing its us e would involve additional costs to growers, as quantified above. Aldicarb also has advantag es to peanut growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of mana gement, confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost e ffectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of control. Therefore, the use on peanut is eligible for reregistration.



## Potato

Current Use Pattern Aldicarb is currently registered for use on potatoes only in Oregon, Idaho, Washington, Montana, northern Florida, and pa rts of Utah and Nevada. Aldicar b is used primarily to control green peach aphid, Colorado potato beetle, and also provides some protection against several species of nematodes. Other pests controlle d include leafhoppers a nd flea beetles.

Aldicarb application to potatoes typically consists of an at-p lant or pre-plant application using positive displacement equipment. Aldicarb granules are applied within the row furrow and

### Page 34 of 191 buried along with the seed potato at planting to a depth of four to eight inches. The potato plant absorbs aldicarb through its roots, and once in the plant, the resi dual activity of al dicarb protects the treated plant against pest nematodes and in sects for six to eight weeks. The maximum application rate for use on potato is currently 3.0 lb s ai/A. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied to potatoes (at a depth of 4 to 8 inches), the Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 198. RQs modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 2 to 179. RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 3 to 67. RQs modele d for mammals using typi cal rates range from 3 to 60. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to aquatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement and Input for Potatoes During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Particip ation Process, in addition to the written comments received from respondents listed in sect ion IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, the National Potato Council, USDA and other interested stakeholders with specific knowle dge relating to aldicarb use on potatoes. These stakeholders have provided additional information regarding al dicarb usage (application methods and rates) and the need for aldicarb use to remain in potat o production. In particular, these stakeholders noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant grow th, resulting in increased yields when used on

potatoes.

Alternatives and Benefits The Agency has determined that the benefits to growers of aldicarb use on potatoes are very high in certain states (Washington, Oregon, Idaho and Florida) and that losing its use would involve substantial costs to grower s. There are also concerns with the potential for resistance if

aldicarb were not available. Several nemat odes, including the root-knot nematode, the root lesion nematode, and the stubby root nematode ar e major pests of potatoes and have wide host ranges, making management with crop rotation diffi cult and relatively ineffective, although they can be controlled by fumigants. Aldicarb may also be used to reduce root-knot nematode populations that remain high after soil fumigation.

There are several alternatives for the use of aldicarb on potatoe s, but none of these will be an adequate substitute. Even if aldicarb is applied specifically to target nematodes, it is inappropriate to ignore the beneficial effect of c ontrolling insect pests, as well. For this reason, an analysis of alternatives to aldicarb considered multiple chemicals so that both nematodes and insects can be targeted.

Because of aldicarb’s ability to control both nematodes and insect pests, alternatives to aldicarb will consist of multiple chemicals used to target multiple pests. The estimates of additional costs for using alternatives to aldica rb range from $77 – 257 pe r acre in the Pacific Northwest, and $77 – 218 in Florida. It is clear th at alternatives will invo lve significant costs to growers who are currently using aldicarb.

### Page 35 of 191 For nematode control, the Agency believes that the most likely alternative to aldicarb is the use of a fumigant, such as 1,3-D, although ad ditional chemicals would be required to control insect pests. While synthetic insecticides re main the most effective means for its control, resistance by the Colorado potato beetle to all classes of insecticides has been documented in many U.S. potato-producing regions. Widesp read and locally dive rse esfenvalerate and phosmet resistance was detected in all c ounties in southern and eastern Idaho.

For additional information, refer to the Agency ’s complete alternative/quantitative impact memo for potatoes which is available in the public docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located

on-line at http://www.regulations.gov/

.

Mitigation To reduce potential ecological risks, the Ag ency has directed, and the registrant has agreed, to develop the mitigation below to help address the above mentioned concerns:

• Modifications in label language to clarify th e manner in which aldicarb is applied to potatoes, and immediately covering with so il. For the label language modifications, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of aldica rb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how aldicarb is soil incorpor ated, actual exposure of poten tially affected populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overe stimated. Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the treated fields wh ere wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expe cted to be limited. The Agency recognizes, however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

As discussed above, the Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on potatoes and that losing its use w ould involve substantial costs to growers. Aldicarb also has advantages to potato growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the le vel of control in the face of une xpected infestation, and cost effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of control. Therefore, the Agency finds the use on potatoes eligible for reregistration.



## Soybean

Current Use Pattern Aldicarb is applied to soybean at planting. Aldicarb granules are applied within the row furrow and buried along with the soybean seed at planting. The maximum application rate for use on soybean is currently 3.0 lbs ai/A. Due to th e nature of how aldicarb is applied to soybean (at a depth greater than 2 inches), the Agency ha s estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism

exposure.

### Page 36 of 191 Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 157. RQs modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.4 to 37. RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 2 to 53. RQs modele d for mammals using typi cal rates range from 0.5 to 12. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to a quatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement/Input for Soybean During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Particip ation Process, in addition to the written comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, USDA and soybean grower s in Georgia, Minnesota and South Carolina with specific knowledge relating to aldicarb use on soybeans.

Alternatives and Benefits

Aldicarb is used as a nematicide in late ma turity soybean varieties grown in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. Because ther e are few late maturity soybean varieties that are resistant to nematodes (root-knot, reniform, a nd Columbian lance), growers of such varieties depend more on aldicarb than growers of early ma turity soybean varieties, for which nematode resistant varieties exist. In South Carolina, approximately 60% of the soybean acreage has nematode problems. The only available aldicarb a lternative for nematode control, 1,3-D, is too expensive for soybean production. Without aldicar b, soybean growers in the affected states would stop growing soybeans or shift to very long rotations with ot her crops. Aldicarb, therefore, is a critical tool for soybean growers.

Mitigation To reduce potential ecological risks, the Ag ency has directed, and the registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

• Limiting the use to the following states: Geor gia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.

• Reducing the application rate fr om 3.0 lbs ai/A to 1.5 lbs ai/A. This equates to a 50% reduction when compared to the current label.

• Modifications in label language to help reduce the amount of aldicarb in use and left on the surface of the soil (i.e., clar ifications in the use of pos itive displacement technology), making it less available for the wildlife poten tially at risk. For the label language modifications, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of aldica rb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how aldicarb is soil incorpor ated, actual exposure of poten tially affected populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overe stimated. Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the treated fields wh ere wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of

### Page 37 of 191 exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expe cted to be limited. The Agency recognizes, however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

The Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on soybeans in Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina, a nd that losing its use w ould involve additional costs to growers. Aldicarb also has advant ages to soybean growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of mana gement, confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost e ffectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of control. Therefore, the Agency finds the use on soybeans eligible for reregistration.



## Sugar Beet

Current Use Pattern Aldicarb application to sugar beets currently consists of an at-plant and a side-dress application. The at planting application is administered with the sugar beet seed and immediately covered with soil. The side-dress app lication is usually administered after the sugar beet has emerged from the soil and is applied along the side of the plant row in furrow and immediately covered with soil.

Aldicarb is used to manage sugar beet root maggot, nematode, particularly sugar beet cyst nematode, beet leafminer, beet leafhopper, aphids, flea beetles, wireworms, and cutworms, primarily in Idaho.

The maximum application rate for use on sugar beet is currently 4.95 lbs ai/A. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applie d to sugar beet (at a depth greate r than 2 inches), the Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applied is cove red with soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 2 to 190. RQs modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.7 to 65. RQs modeled for mammals using maximum rates range from 3 to 64. RQs modele d for mammals using typi cal rates range from 0.9 to 22. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to a quatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement and Input for Sugar Beet During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Particip ation Process, in addition to the written comments from respondents listed in section IV . B. above, the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, American S ugarbeet Growers Association, Western Sugar Cooperative, NYSSA-NAMPA Beet Growers A ssociation, USDA, and other interested stakeholders with specific knowle dge relating to sugar beet producti on. These stakeholders have provided additional information regarding aldicarb usage (application techniques and application rates) and the need for aldicarb use to remain in sugar beet pr oduction. In particular, these stakeholders also noted that aldicarb appears to effect plant growth, resulting in increased yields when used on sugar beet.

### Page 38 of 191 Alternatives and Benefits The Agency understands that aldicarb use on su gar beet is of great benefit to the sugar beet industry, particularly in Western states, and that losing its use would involve substantial costs to growers in those states. The available usage data indicate 75 per cent of the sugar beet acreage in Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington was treated with aldicar b in 2005. Aldicarb is used primarily to manage sugar beet root maggot and nematodes on sugar beets, which are major pests of sugar beets. If left uncontrolled, yield losses from sugar beet root maggot can be

as much as 80%. Yield losses from nematodes can be equally as devastating to a sugar beet

crop.

For insect control, sugar beet root maggot is a major pest of s ugar beets and aldicarb effectively controls both adults a nd larvae. If aldicarb were not available for the control of sugar beet maggot, growers would likely use terbufos wh ich is not as effective on both the adult fly and larvae. Additionally, EPA has required, and the terbufos registrant has agreed, to a phased approach that will ultimately re duce sales of terbufos by 55% by 2008

. 

### Other pesticides

available and used to a lesser extent than aldicarb and terbufos include p horate, chlorpyrifos, and

carbofuran. Phorate controls larvae but is mos tly used in areas with low pest pressure. Carbofuran was available in Idaho and Oregon under 24c labels to control larvae but does not have a long residual value. Further, the Agency expects to initiate action in the near future to

cancel all uses of carbofuran. Esfenavalerate and zeta-cypermethrin c ontrol adult flies but

another insecticide would need to be used to control larvae. For nematodes, only fumigants are

available for control besides aldicarb but are significantly more expensive than aldicarb.

For nematode control specifically, only fumiga nts are available as alternatives, such as 1,3-D. A major disadvantage to using 1,3-D is the chemical cost relative to aldicarb (see below). Another disadvantage of using 1,3-D is that gr owers must wait for the soil to warm before fumigating, and then wait for the gas to dissipate before planting, shortening the growing season.

Growers would also need to consider the adde d costs due to different application equipment using 1,3-D.

The estimates of costs for using aldicarb alte rnatives are more than $20 per treatment per acre to control the sugar beet root maggot a nd approximately $88 to control nematodes. For comparison, the cost of aldicarb is about $40 pe r acre. This assumes that the alternatives are equally efficacious. Although the alternatives for c ontrol of the sugar beet root maggot appear to be less expensive, other considerations may pr eclude their use. If the alternatives are less effective than aldicarb, yield or quality impacts could also occur. In addition, if multiple pests targeted by aldicarb are present, multiple chemi cals/applications may be needed to achieve a

similar level of control.

For additional information, refer to the Agency’s response to Phase 5 comments found EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163 and located on-line at http://www.regulations.gov/

.

### Page 39 of 191 Mitigation To reduce potential ecological risks, the Ag ency has directed, and the registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

• Limit use to the following states: Califor nia, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming.

• Modifications in label language to help reduc e the amount of aldicarb left on the surface of the soil (i.e., clarifications in the use of positive displacement technology) and making it less available for the wildlife potentially at risk. For the label language modifications, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of aldica rb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how aldicarb is soil incorpor ated, actual exposure of poten tially affected populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overe stimated. Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the treated fields wh ere wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expe cted to be limited. The Agency recognizes, however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

As discussed above, the Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on sugar beets in certain states (California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, Washington and Wyoming) and that losing its use would involve s ubstantial costs to growers. Aldicarb also has advantages to sugar beet gr owers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplicity of management, confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, and cost effectiveness when cons idering the full range of pests and duration of control. Therefore, the Agency finds the us e on sugar beet eligible for reregistration.



## Sweet Potato

Current Use Pattern Aldicarb application to sweet pot ato typically consists of an at-plant application using positive displacement equipment. Aldicarb granules are applied within the row furrow and buried along with the seed piece at planting to a de pth of four to eight inches. The sweet potato plant absorbs aldicarb th rough its roots and once in the plant, the residual activity of aldicarb protects the treated plant agai nst pest nematodes and insects for six to eight weeks. The maximum application rate for use on sweet potato is currently 3.0 lbs ai/A. Due to the nature of how aldicarb is applied to sweet potatoes (at a de pth of 4 to 8 inches), the Agency has estimated that 99% of the aldicarb applie d is covered with soil, and that only 1% remains on the surface for potential terrestrial organism exposure.

Risks of Concern Assuming 99% Soil Incorporation RQs modeled for birds using maximum rates range from 1 to 125. RQs modeled for birds calculated using typical rates range from 0.7 to 58. RQs modeled for mammals using

### Page 40 of 191 maximum rates range from 2 to 42. RQs modele d for mammals using typi cal rates range from 0.8 to 20. Additionally, although RQs are low, the Agency’s assessment also suggests the potential for adverse effects to a quatic invertebrates and fish.

Stakeholder Involvement and Input for Sweet Potato During Phases 5 and 6 of the Public Participa tion Process, in additi on to receiving written comments from respondents listed in section IV. B. above, the Agency has met with and received comments from Bayer, USDA, and other interested stakeholders relating to aldicarb use on sweet potato. These stakeholders have provided a dditional information rega rding aldicarb usage (application and applicat ion rates) and the need for aldicarb use to remain in sweet potato production.

Alternatives and Benefits The Agency understands that aldicarb use on sw eet potatoes is of bene fit in the states of Louisiana and Mississippi and that losing aldica rb’s use would involve substantial cost to growers. It is a very important tool for sw eet potato growers where nematode pressure is present. Alternatives include 1,3-D, oxamyl and ethoprop, but they do not, however, control a particular pest, the reniform nematode, as well as aldicarb. This nematode causes smaller, misshapen sweet potatoes that cannot be marketed and aldicarb is the only tool which completely controls this pest species. Not controlling ne matodes may result in 100% yield loss, and partial control can yield poor quality sweet potatoes, wh ich if sold on the processing market, will only bring 10% of the prices of marketable sweet potatoes.

Mitigation To reduce potential ecological risks, the Ag ency has directed, and the registrant has agreed, to develop several mitigation measures to help address the above mentioned concerns. They include:

• Limit application of aldicarb to: Louisiana and Mississippi only.

• Addition of label language specifying granules be applied in a 12-inch band within an open furrow and covered immediately during bed forming by mechanically hilling 8 to

10 inches.

• Slight modifications in label language to he lp reduce the amount of aldicarb left on the surface of the soil (i.e., clarif ications in the use of positiv e displacement technology) and making it less available for the wildlife poten tially at risk. For the label language modifications, please refer to Table 5 in Section V.

EPA Decision Aldicarb has the potential to cause adverse effects to birds, mammals and aquatic species. However, due to the physical properties of aldica rb’s granules (e.g., color, size, and solubility) and how aldicarb is soil incorpor ated, actual exposure of poten tially affected populations to aldicarb granules is uncertain and may be overe stimated. Potential risks to birds and mammals would be limited primarily to the treated fields wh ere wildlife, if present, could ingest granules that are not incorporated in the soil and that have not yet dissolved. Therefore, the extent of exposure, both spatially and temporally, is expe cted to be limited. The Agency recognizes, however, that actual exposure of wildlife to aldicarb is uncertain.

### Page 41 of 191 As discussed above, the Agency has determined that there are benefits of aldicarb use on sweet potatoes in certain states (Louisiana and Mississi ppi) and that losing its use would involve substantial costs to growers. Aldicarb also has advantages to sweet potato growers for which EPA cannot estimate dollar values, such as simplic ity of management, confidence in the level of control in the face of unexpected infestation, an d cost effectiveness when considering the full range of pests and duration of control. Theref ore, the Agency finds the use on sweet potatoes eligible for reregistration.

4. Other Labeling Requirements

In order to be eligible for reregistration , additional aldicarb information needs to be included in the labeling of all e nd-use products containing aldicarb. Uses and use patterns need

to be clarified as indicated in Table 5 below to reflect and better describe actual use patterns for aldicarb. For the specific label statements and a list of additional data requirements necessary to confirm this decision, refer to Section V of this IRED document.

5. Threatened and Endangered Species Considerations

The Agency’s screening level risk assessm ent for endangered and threatened species

concluded that use of aldicarb has direct adverse effects on listed species in the following taxonomic groups: terrestrial invertebrates, bird s, terrestrial phase amphibians, reptiles, mammals, freshwater fish, freshwater inverteb rates, estuarine/marine invertebrates, and estuarine/marine fish. There is also the potential for indirect adverse effects for listed species in multiple taxonomic groups that are dependent upon species that do experience direct adverse effects. These findings are based solely on EPA’s screening level assessment and do not constitute “may affect” findings under the Endangered Species Act.

The Agency has developed the Endangered Species Protection Program to identify pesticides whose use may cause adverse impacts on threatened and endangered species and to implement mitigation measures that address these impacts. The Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to ensure that their actions are not likely to jeopardize listed species or adversely modify designated critical habitat. To analyze the potenti al of registered pesticide uses that may affect any particular species, EPA uses basic toxicity and expos ure data developed for

REDs and considers it in relation to individu al species by evaluating important ecological parameters, pesticide use information, the ge ographic relationship between specific pesticide uses and species locations, and biological require ments and behavioral asp ects of the particular species. When conducted, this species-specific analysis will take into consideration any risk mitigation measures that are being implemen ted at the time as a result of this RED.

Following this future species-specific analysis, a determination that there is a likelihood of potential effects to a listed sp ecies or its critical habitat may re sult in further limitations on use of aldicarb, other measures to mitigate any potentia l effects, or consultations with the Fish and

Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisher ies as appropriate. If the Agency determines use of aldicarb “may affect” listed species or their designated critical habitat, EPA will employ the provisions in the Services regulations (50 CF R Part 402). Until a species-specific analysis is completed, the risk mitigation measures being implemented through this RED (e.g., rate

### Page 42 of 191 reductions and geographic restrictions) will reduce the likelihood that endangered and threatened species may be exposed to aldicarb at levels of concern. EPA is not requiring specific aldicarb label language at the present time relative to threatened and endange red species. If, in the future, specific measures are necessary for the protectio n of listed species, the Agency will implement them through the Endangered Species Protection Program.

EPA is currently engaging in informal consultations with the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service, wh ich is a part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This means that the Agencies are working together to conduct a full endangered species assessment for aldicarb, which is separate from this RED. The likelihood of potential impacts to endangered species will need to be assessed for all counties in which: 1) crops registered for aldicarb use are grow n; and 2) contain habitat for at least one listed species.

### Page 43 of 191 V. What Registrants Need to Do

The Agency has determined that products containing the active ingredient aldicarb are eligible for reregistration provided that the risk mitigation measures outlined in this document are adopted and label amendments are made to reflect these measures. The Agency intends to issue DCIs for generic (technical grade) data an d product-specific data. Generally, registrants will have 90 days from receipt of a generic DCI to complete and submit response forms or request time extension and/or waiver requests with a full written justification. The DCIs will include specific requirements a nd instructions on how to respond. Table 4 below presents the additional generic data the Agency intends to re quire for aldicarb to confirm the decision that products containing the active ingr edient aldicarb are eligible for reregistration. For productspecific DCIs, registrants will have eight months from receipt of the DCI to submit data and to submit amended labels. In order for products co ntaining the active ingredient aldicarb to be eligible for reregistration, all product labels must be amended to incorporate the specific changes and language presented in Table 5 below. Tabl e 5 also describes how the required language should be incorporated.

A. Manufacturing-Use Products

1. Additional Generic Data Requirements The generic database supporting the reregist ration of aldicarb has been reviewed and determined to be substantially complete. However, EPA is requiring the following additional data to confirm the decisions presented in this RED. The Agency intends to issue a generic DCI

for this data.

Table 4. Data requirements for the reregistration of aldicarb

.

Data Requirement New OPPTS Guideline Number (GLN) Magnitude of the Residue in Plant Studies

Data depicting the magnitude of aldicarb residues of concern in cotton gin byproducts are required in accordance with Table 1 of OPPTS Series 860 Residue Chemistry Test Guidelines, 8/96. 860.1500

Terrestrial Plant Toxicity – Tier 1 (seedling emergence) 850.4100 Terrestrial Plant Toxicity – Tier 1 (vegetative Vigor) 850.4150 Aquatic Plant toxicity Test – using Lemna spp. – Tiers I and II 850.4400 Avian Reproduction Study in Quail

Avian Reproduction Study in Duck 850.2300

UV/Visible Aborption 830.7050 Comparative Cholinestera se Assay Special Study



### 2. Labeling for Manufacturing-Use Products

To ensure compliance with FIFRA, labeli ng for all manufacturing-use products (MUPs) should be revised to comply with all current EPA regulations, PR Notices, and applicable policies. The MUP labeling shoul d bear the specific language presented in Table 5 below.

### Page 44 of 191 B. End-Use Products

1. Additional Product-Specific Data Requirements

Section 4(g)(2)(B) of FIFRA calls for the Ag ency to obtain any needed product-specific data regarding the pesticide after a determination of eligibility has been made. The registrant must review previous data submissions to ensu re they meet current EPA acceptance criteria and if not, commit to conduct new studies. If a registrant believes that previously submitted data meet current testing standards, then the st udy MRID numbers can be cited according to the instructions in the Requirement Status and Registrations Response Form provided for each product. The Agency intends to issue a separa te product-specific DCI outlining specific data requirements.

2. Labeling for End-Use Products

To be eligible for reregistration, labeling changes are necessary to implement measures outlined in Section IV above. The specific changes and language are presented in Table 5 below. Generally, conditions for the distribution and sale of products bearing old labels/labeling will be established when the label changes are approved. However, specific existing stocks time frames will be established case-by-case, depending on the number of products involved, the number of label changes, and other factors.Page 45 of 191Table 5. Summary of Required Labeling Changes for Aldicarb Products.DescriptionAmended Labeling Language for Manufacturing Use ProductsPlacement on LabelFor allManufacturing UseProducts“Only for formulation into aninsecticide/nematicidefor the following uses: citrus,cotton, dry bean, peanuts, potatoes,soybean, sugar beets, sweet potatoes.”“Only formulation into low dust granular productssuch as products that use a vinyl bindercoating to adhere the aldicarb to either a corn cob grit or a gypsum substrate. Bindingaldicarb to clay substrate is prohibited.”Directions for UseNote to RegistrantThis product may not be used to formulate products for use on alfalfa grown for seed,coffee, ornamentals, pecans, sorghum, sugarcane, and tobacco.One of thesestatements may beadded to a label toallow reformulationof the product for aspecific use or alladditional usessupported by aformulator or usergroup“This product may be used to formulate products for specific uses not listed on the MPlabel if the formulator, user group, or grower has complied with U.S. EPA submissionrequirements regarding support of such uses.”“This product may be used to formulate products for any additional uses not listed on theMP label if the formulator, user group, orgrower has complied with U.S. EPA submissionrequirements regarding support of such uses.”Directions for UseEnvironmentalHazards Statements“This pesticide is extremely toxic to birds andmammals. This pesticide is toxic to fish andaquatic invertebrates. Do not discharge effluent containing this product into lakes,streams, ponds, estuaries, oceans, or other waters unless in accordance with therequirements of a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit andthe permitting authority has been notified in writing prior to discharge. Do not dischargeeffluent containing this product to sewer systems without previously notifying the localsewage treatment plant authority. For guidance contact your State Water Board orRegional Office of the EPA.”Precautionary StatementsPage 46 of 191End Use Products Intended for Occupational UseRestricted UsePesticide“Restricted Use Pesticide”“Due to acute oral toxicity and to ground water contamination. Forretail sale to and useonly by Certified Applicators or persons under the direct supervision of a CertifiedApplicator, and only for those uses coveredby the Certified Applicator’s certification.”This statement mustappear at the very top ofthe label's front panel[see 40 CFR156.10(j)(2)(i) for moreinformation]. No otherwording or symbolsshould appear above theRUP statement.PPE RequirementsEstablished by theRED1for low- dustgranular formulationsthat are packaged inclosed loading andapplication systems(e.g., Lock ‘n Load,Smartbox)“Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)”“Some materials that are chemical-resistant to this product are” (registrant inserts correctchemical-resistant material). “If you want more options, follow the instructions forcategory”[registrant inserts A,B,C,D,E,F,G,or H] “on an EPA chemical-resistancecategory selection chart."“All loaders, applicators, and other handlers must wear;> long-sleeved shirts and long pants,> shoes plus socks.In addition, loaders and handlers cleaning equipment or spills must wear:> chemical-resistant gloves made of any waterproof material, and> chemical-resistant apron.See engineering controls section for additional requirements.”Immediatelyfollowing/belowPrecautionaryStatements: Hazards toHumans and DomesticAnimals.PPE RequirementsEstablished by theRED1for granular“Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)”“Some materials that are chemical-resistant tothis product are” (registrant inserts correctImmediatelyfollowing/belowPrecautionaryPage 47 of 191low- dustformulations that arenot packaged in aclosed loading andapplication system.chemical-resistant material). “If you wantmore options, follow the instructions forcategory” [registrant inserts A,B,C,D,E,F,G,or H] “on an EPA chemical-resistancecategory selection chart."“All loaders, applications and otherhandlers must wear at a minimum:> coveralls over long-sleeved shirts and long pants,> chemical-resistant gloves made of any waterproof material,> chemical-resistant footwear plus socks, and> protective eyewear.In addition, loaders and handlers cleaning equipment or spills must wear:> chemical-resistant apron, and> a NIOSH-approved respirator with a dust/mist filter with MSHA/ NIOSH approvalnumber prefix TC-21C or any N, R, P, or HE filter.”“See engineering controls for additional options.”Statements: Hazards toHumans and DomesticAnimals.User SafetyRequirements“Follow manufacturer's instructions for cleaning/maintaining PPE. If no such instructionsfor washables exist, use detergent and hot water. Keep and wash PPE separately fromother laundry.”PrecautionaryStatements: Hazards toHumans and DomesticAnimals immediatelyfollowing the PPErequirements.Engineering Controlsfor granular lowdust formulationsthat are packaged inclosed loading andapplication systems(e.g., Lock ‘n Load,Smartbox)“Engineering Controls”“This product is formulated into a (registrant inserts the trade name of the closed system inwhich the product is marketed, such as Lock ‘N Load or SmartBox) system that meets thedefinition of a closed loading and application system in the Worker Protection Standard forAgricultural Pesticides [40 CFR 170.240(d)(4)].Loaders and applicators using the closedsystem packaging must:-- wear the personal protective equipment required in the PPE section of this labeling forloaders during loading, and-- wear the personal protective equipment required in the PPE section of this labeling forPrecautionaryStatements: Hazards toHumans and DomesticAnimals (Immediatelyfollowing PPE and UserSafety Requirements.)Page 48 of 191applicators during applying, and-- be provided, have immediately available,and use in an emergency, such as a brokenpackage, spill, or equipment breakdown: chemical-resistant gloves,chemical-resistantapron, chemical-resistant footwear, protective eyewear, and a NIOSH-approved respiratorwith a dust/mist filter with MSHA/NIOSH approval number prefix TC-21Corany N R, P,or HE filter.”EngineeringControls: EnclosedCabs for GroundApplicators“Engineering Control Options for Enclosed Cabs:Applicators using an enclosed cab that meets the definition in the Worker ProtectionStandard for Agricultural Pesticides [40CFR 170.240(d)(5)] may wear reduced personalprotective equipment, provided they:-- wear a long-sleeve shirt, long pants, shoes, and socks-- are provided, have immediately available,and use in an emergency, such as a brokenpackage, spill, or equipment breakdown: chemical-resistant gloves,chemical-resistantapron, chemical-resistant footwear, protective eyewear, and a NIOSH-approved respiratorwith a dust/mist filter with MSHA/NIOSH approval number prefix TC-21Corany N R, P,or HE filter.-- take off any PPE that was worn in thetreated area before reentering the cab, and-- store all such PPE in a chemical-resistant container, such as a plastic bag, to preventcontamination of the inside of the cab.”PrecautionaryStatements: Hazards toHumans and DomesticAnimals (Immediatelyfollowing PPE and UserSafety Requirements.)User SafetyRecommendations“User Safety Recommendations”“Users should wash hands before eating, drinking, chewing gum, using tobacco, or usingthe toilet.Users should remove clothing/PPE immediatelyif pesticide gets inside. Then washthoroughly and put on clean clothing.Users should remove PPE immediately after handling this product. Wash the outside ofgloves before removing. As soon as possible, wash thoroughly and change into cleanclothing.”Precautionary Statementsunder: Hazards toHumans and DomesticAnimals immediatelyfollowing EngineeringControls(Must be placed in abox.)Environmental“This pesticide is extremely toxic to birds andwildlife. Birds feeding on exposed granulesPrecautionary StatementsPage 49 of 191Hazardsmay be killed. Cover or immediately soilincorporate granules spilled during loading.”“This pesticide is toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Run-off from treated areas maybe hazardous to fish in neighboring areas. Donot apply directly to water, to areas wheresurface water is present or to inter-tidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do notcontaminate water when disposing of equipment wash waters.”“This product is toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment. Do not apply this product whilebees are actively visiting the treatment area.”“Aldicarb is known to leach through soil intoground water under certain conditions as aresult of labeled use. Use of this chemical in areas where soils are permeable, particularlywhere the water table is shallow, mayresult in ground-water contamination.”“See use directions for individual crops for additional ground water restrictions. See soiltables.”immediately followingthe User SafetyRecommendationsEnvironmentalHazards StatementsRequired by theRED and AgencyLabel Policies“Under the Endangered Species Act, it is a Federal Offense to use any pesticide in amanner that results in the death of amember of an endangered species.This Act protects Attwater's Greater PrairieChicken in the Texas counties of Aransas,Austin, Brazoria, Colorado, Galveston,Goliad, Harris, Refugio, and Victoria.Prior to making applications in these counties,the user must determine that this species isnot located in or immediately adjacent to thearea to be treated. If the user is in doubtwhether or not the above named endangered species may be affected, he should contacteither the regional U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service office (Endangered Species Specialist) orpersonnel of the State Fish and Game office.”Precautionary StatementsPage 50 of 191Restricted-EntryInterval for productswith directions foruse within scope ofthe WorkerProtection Standardfor AgriculturalPesticides (WPS)“Do not enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the restricted entry interval(REI) of 48 hours.”“Exception:If the product is soil-incorporated orsoil-injected, the Worker ProtectionStandard, under certain circumstances, allows workers to enterthe treated area if there willbe no contact with anything that has been treated.”Agricultural UseRequirements BoxEarly Entry PersonalProtective Equipmentfor products withdirections for usewithin the scope ofthe WPS“PPE required for early entry to treated areas that is permitted under the WorkerProtection Standard and that involves contact with anything that has been treated, such asplants, soil, or water, is:* coveralls worn over long-sleeve shirt and long pants,* chemical-resistant gloves made of any waterproof material,* chemical-resistant footwear plus socks, and* protective eyewear.”Direction for UseAgricultural UseRequirements boxDouble notificationrequirement“Notify workers of the application by warning them orally and by posting warning signsat entrances to treated areas.”Agricultural UseRequirements BoxGeneral ApplicationRestrictions““Do not apply this product in a way that will contact workers or other persons, eitherdirectly or through drift. Only protected handlers may be in the area during application.”Place in the Direction forUse directly above theAgricultural Use Box.Other ApplicationRestrictions forallproducts“Application must be made using a motorized ground spreader. Application usingaircraft, handheld, backpack spreaders,or push-type spreaders is prohibited.”Directions for UseAssociated with theSpecific Use PatternOther ApplicationRestrictions forproducts withdirections for use onCitrusCITRUSThe maximum single application rate is 4.95 lbs ai/A.Do not make more than one application per tree per use season.Do not allow livestock to graze in treated area.The Preharvest Interval is 30 days.Directions for UseAssociated with theSpecific Use PatternPage 51 of 191(Note: The maximumallowable applicationrate and maximumallowable seasonalrate must be listed aspounds or gallons offormulated productper acre, not just aspounds activeingredient per acre.)All application must be made with granularapplicators which use Positive DisplacementMetering Units.For all applications, immediately deep-disc anyspills at row ends or elsewhere to ensurethe granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.Granules must be place into bottom of the seed furrow and immediately covered with atleast 2 inches of soil by mechanical means.For Mature Citrus Trees:“apply in a band along the drip line on both sides of tree row.Apply granules in 3 to 6 furrows that are 2to 3 inches deep and spaced on approximately12 inch centers. Immediately cover with soilby mechanical means. The width of eachband should equal 1/4 the tree row spacing.”ORFor furrow irrigation applications to mature citrus, “apply granules 2 to 3 inches deep inthe irrigation furrow using 2 shanks per furrow.”For Immature Citrus Trees (1-2 years old):“0.3 oz ai/tree (do not exceed 4.95 lbs ai/acre).Apply granules in a furrow beside individual treesand cover with at least 2 inches of soil.”Other ApplicationRestrictions forproducts withdirections for use onCotton(Note: The maximumallowable applicationrate and maximumallowable seasonalrate must be listed aspounds or gallons offormulated productper acre, not just aspounds activeingredient per acre.)COTTONThe maximum single at-plant application rate is 1.5 lbs ai/A.The maximum single side-dress (post-emergence) application rate is 2.1 lbs ai/A.Do not exceed a total of 3.6 lbs ai/A per year.Do not make more than one at-plant application and one post-emergence application percrop.Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.Do not feed cotton forage to livestock orallow livestock to graze in treated area.If it is not known whether the water table isgreater than 25 ft below ground surface,assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.For all applications, immediately deep-disc anyspills at row ends or elsewhere to ensurethe granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.At Planting:“Apply granules in the seed furrow and immediately cover with soil bymechanical means.Directions for UseAssociated with theSpecific Use PatternPage 52 of 191ORIf rate exceeds 1.05 lbs ai/A on 40 inch rows, “apply granules in a 4 to 6 inch band (Tband) over open seed furrow and immediately cover by mechanical means.”At First Squaring:“Apply side dress granules in a furrow that is 6 to10 inches to one orboth sides of the plant row to a depth of 2 to 3 inches.”Other ApplicationRestrictions forproducts withdirections for use onDry Bean(Note: The maximumallowable applicationrate and maximumallowable seasonalrate must be listed aspounds or gallons offormulated productper acre, not just aspounds activeingredient per acre.)DRY BEANS (other than soybeans)For use in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Michigan only.Do not exceed a total of 2.1 lbs ai/A/season.Do not make more than one application per crop.Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.Do not feed green forage, hay, or straw to livestock.Do not allow livestock to graze intreated areas before harvest.Do not use green pods as food for humans.If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below ground surface,assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.Immediately deep-disc any spills at row endsor elsewhere to ensure the granular iscompletely covered with a layer of soil.For all applications, except forwhere furrow irrigation is used:“Apply granules in seedfurrow and immediately cover withsoil by mechanical means.ORApply in a furrow that is 2 to 3 inches to theside of seed row and 2 to 3 inches deep inseed furrow and immediately coverwith soil by mechanical means.ORApply granules on a 4 to 6 inch band over open furrow and immediately cover with soil bymechanical means. Plant into treated zone.”When furrow irrigation is used:“apply granules 3 to 4 inches deep and 3 inches from theseed row on the water furrow side and immediate cover with soil by mechanical means.”Directions for UseAssociated with theSpecific Use PatternOther ApplicationRestrictions forPEANUTDo not exceed a total of 3.0 lbs ai/A/seasonDirections for UseAssociated with thePage 53 of 191products withdirections for use onPeanut(Note: The maximumallowable applicationrate and maximumallowable seasonalrate must be listed aspounds or gallons offormulated productper acre, not just aspounds activeingredient per acre.)Do not harvest within 90 days of application.Do not hog-off treated fields.Do not allow livestock to graze intreated areas before harvest.Do not feed hay or vines to livestock.Post-emergence applications can only be usedin fields where overhead irrigation isavailable.Do not make more than one application per crop in states other than Alabama, Florida,Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, and Virginia.Do not make the split application to Spanishpeanuts or other short season varieties (aminimum of 90 days is required between pegging applications and harvest).If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in AL, GA and SC and a vulnerable soil is present and thewater table is less than 25 feet below ground surface, do not apply within500 feetof adrinking water well unless wells are eithercased to 100 feet below ground level or aminimum of 30 feet below the water table.If it is not known whether the water table isgreater than 25 feet below ground surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feetbelow ground surface.If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in Florida and a vulnerable soil is present (see soils listedbelow), and the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface, do not apply within500 feetof a drinking water well unless wells are either cased to 100 feet below groundlevel or a minimum of 30 feet below the water table. In Florida, it is the responsibility ofthe applicator to document the construction ofwells claimed not to be shallow. This mustconsist of: (a) a copy of the well completion report issued by the appropriate watermanagement district; or (b) a statement certified as to accuracy by a licensed wellcontractor. The U.S.D.A. Natural ResourcesConservation Service which serves yourcounty can tell you if the soils on your farm fall within the following types of vulnerablesoils. If it is not known whether the watertable is greater than 25 feet below groundsurface, assume that the water table isless than 25 feet below ground surface.For all applications, immediately deep-disc anyspills at row ends or elsewhere to ensurethe granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.Thrips At Planting:“Apply granules in seed furrow and immediately cover with soil bymechanical means to a depth of 2 to 4 inches.”Nematodes At Planting:“Apply granules in a 4-6 inch band over open seed furrow (TSpecific Use PatternPage 54 of 191band) and immediately cover with soil by mechanical means to a depth of 2 to 4 inches.ORApply granules in a 6 to 12 inch band and immediately cover with soil by mechanicalmeans to a depth of 2 to 4 inches. Plant seed into treated zone.”At Pegging:“Apply granules in a band 12 to 18 inches wide on the row and into the plantcanopy. Ensure that plant foliage is dry prior to application. Dislodge granules fromfoliage by suitable means that will not damage the plant. Application must be made late inthe afternoon or early evening, immediately followed by irrigation, and completed within24 hours unless rainfall is received.”Other ApplicationRestrictions forproducts withdirections for use onPotato(Note: The maximumallowable applicationrate and maximumallowable seasonalrate must be listed aspounds or gallons offormulated productper acre, not just aspounds activeingredient per acre.)POTATOESFor use only in the states of Florida, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington; in Utah inthe counties of Beaver, Boxelder, Cache, Carbon, Davis, Duchesne, Iron, Millard, Plute,Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier, Ulntah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber; and inNevada in the counties of Humboldt and Pershing.Do not exceed 3.0 lbs ai/A/season.All applications must be made with Positive Displacement Applicators such as HorstineMicroband® or Gandy PDM® or with otherPositive Displacement Applicators approvedunder the Bayer CropScience Equipment Certification Program. The applicator must becertified through the Bayer CropScience Stewardship program.Do not harvest within 100 days of application for potatoes grown in Florida and within 150days of application for potatoes grown in the Pacific Northwest (Idaho, Montana, Oregon,Washington, and certain counties in Nevada and Utah).Do not apply after planting.Do not make more than one application per crop. If replanting is necessary, do not retreatthe second crop with (registrant insert brand name).Do not allow livestock to graze intreated areas before harvest.In state other than Florida, do not use furrow irrigation on aldicarb-treated potatoes.Do not use this product on potatoes in any state other than those immediately listed above.If it is not known whether the water table isgreater than 25 ft below ground surface,assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.Immediately deep-disc any spills at row endsor elsewhere to ensure the granular iscompletely covered with a layer of soil.Directions for UseAssociated with theSpecific Use PatternPage 55 of 191At Planting:“Apply granules in a 6 inch band and immediately cover with 4 to 8 inches ofsoil by mechanical means. Plantseed pieces into treated zone.ORApply granules in furrow with seed piece. Immediately cover with 4 to 8 inches of soil bymechanical means.”Other ApplicationRestrictions forproducts withdirections for use onSoybean(Note: The maximumallowable applicationrate and maximumallowable seasonalrate must be listed aspounds or gallons offormulated productper acre, not just aspounds activeingredient per acre.)SOYBEANFor use on soybeans grown only in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.Do not exceed a total of 1.5 lbs ai/A/season.Do not make more than one application per crop.Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.Do not allow livestock to graze intreated areas before harvest.Do not feed green forage, hay or straw to livestock.If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below ground surface,assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.Immediately deep-disc any spills at row endsor elsewhere to ensure the granular iscompletely covered with a layer of soil.At Planting:“Apply granules in seed furrow and immediately cover with soil bymechanical means.ORIf rate exceeds 0.9 lbs ai/A on 30 inch rows, “Apply a 4 to 6 inch band over open seedfurrow and immediately cover withsoil by mechanical means.”Directions for UseAssociated with theSpecific Use PatternOther ApplicationRestrictions forproducts withdirections for use onSugar Beet(Note: The maximumallowable applicationSUGAR BEETSFor use only in California, Colorado, Idaho,Montana, Nebraska, Oregon, Washington, andWyoming.The total maximum rate per crop cycle is 4.95 lbs ai/A.Do not make more than one at-planting application and two post-emergence applicationsper crop.Do not apply within 90 days of harvest.If tops are to be fed to livestock, do not apply within 120 days of harvest.”Directions for UseAssociated with theSpecific Use PatternPage 56 of 191rate and maximumallowable seasonalrate must be listed aspounds or gallons offormulated productper acre, not just aspounds activeingredient per acre.)Do not use tops as food to humans.If it is not known whether the water table isgreater than 25 ft below ground surface,assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface.For all applications, immediately deep-disc anyspills at row ends or elsewhere to ensurethe granular is completely covered with a layer of soil.Nematodes At Planting:“Apply granules in a 4 to 6 inch band and immediately cover withsoil by mechanical means. Plant seed into or above treated zone.ORwhere furrow irrigation is employed for seed germination, drill granules 3 to 4 inches deepand 3 inches from seed row on water furrow side.”Aphids, Leafminers and Leafhoppers At Planting: “Drill granules 1 to 3 inches belowseedline.”Sugar Beet Root Maggot At Planting:“Apply granules in a 2 to 3 inch band over seed rowand immediately cover with soil by mechanical means.ORwhere furrow irrigation is employed for seed germination, drill granules2 inches deep and 2 inches from seed row on water furrow side.For the 7 lb. rate, apply granules in a 1 to 2inch band in front of the press wheel as thefurrow is closing.”Post-emergence:“Apply granules to both sides of plant row and immediately cover withsoil by mechanical means.ORfor furrow irrigation side-dress granules 4 to8 inches to water furrow side of plantrow at furrow depth. Irrigate soon after application. Apply within 60 days afterplanting.”Other ApplicationRestrictions forproducts withSWEET POTATOESFor use in Louisiana and Mississippi only.Maximum application rate is 3 pounds ai/A/crop.Directions for UseAssociated with theSpecific Use PatternPage 57 of 191directions for use onSweet Potato(Note: The maximumallowable applicationrate and maximumallowable seasonalrate must be listed aspounds or gallons offormulated productper acre, not just aspounds activeingredient per acre.)Do not make more than one application per crop.Do not harvest within 120 days of application.Do not feed sweet potato vines to livestock.Application must be made with granularapplicators which use Positive DisplacementMetering Units. Apply granules in a 12-inchband open furrow. Immediately covergranules by mechanical hilling soil at least 8 to 10 inches.If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 ft below groundsurface, assume that the water table isless than 25 feet below ground surface.Immediately deep-disc any spills at row endsor elsewhere to ensure the granular iscompletely covered with a layer of soil.Pre-plant or At Planting:“Apply granules in a 12-inch band open furrow or soil surfaceand cover immediately during bed forming by mechanically hilling up 8 to 10 inches.Place transplant in center of treated zone.”1PPE that is established on the basis of Acute Toxicity of the end-use product must becompared to the active ingredient PPE inthis document. The more protective PPE must be placed in the productlabeling. For guidance on which PPE is considered more protective, see PR Notice 93-7.

### Page 58 of 191 Appendix A. Aldicarb Uses and Use- Patterns Eligible for Reregistration

SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

CITRUS (Oranges, Grapefruit, Lemons, and Limes only) 30 day(s) preharvest interval. All application must be made with granular applicators which use Positive Displacement Metering Units. Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves. Do not apply directly to water, or to areas wher e surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More restrictive setbacks may apply. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipm ent or disposal of equipment wash waters. Do not contaminate water, food or feed. Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not graze dairy anim als in treated areas. Do not graze livestock in treated areas. Do not graze meat animals in treated areas. Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden. Endangered species restriction. For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas wh ere surface water is present or

to inter-tidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Ground water restriction. Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches. Proper ventilation required. Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas. This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates. This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife. For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil. 10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes w ithin 8 months after the last application. Geographic disallowable: CA, CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Curry County, OR.

Foliar

Soil in-furrow

treatment /Soil shanking

treatment /Soil

treatment.

Granule applicator. 4.95

lb ai/A G 4.95

lb ai/A

4.95

lb ai/cc 1/1 cc NS 48 h

COTTON (UNSPECIFIED) 90 day(s) preharvest interval. Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves. Do not apply directly to water, or to areas wher e surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More restrictive setbacks may apply.

### Page 59 of 191 SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

Do not apply when drift is likely to occur. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipm ent or disposal of equipment wash waters. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste. Do not contaminate water, food or feed. Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not feed forage to livestock

or allow livestock to graze in treated areas. Do not graze dairy anim als in treated areas. Do not graze meat animals in treated areas. Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden. Endangered species restriction. For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas wh ere surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Ground water restriction. Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches. Proper ventilation required. Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas. This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates. This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife. For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil. 10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes w ithin 8 months after the last application. Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ , NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Band treatment

/Soil band

treatment /Soil

drill treatment

/Soil in-furrow

treatment.

Granule applicator. 1.5

lb ai/A G 3.6

lb ai/A

3.6

lb ai/cc 2/cc NS 48 h

At first squaring

Soil sidedress

treatment.Granule applicator. 2.1

lb ai/A G 3.7

lb ai/A

3.6

lb ai/cc 2/cc NS 48 h

Squaring through early

bloom

Soil in-furrow

treatment /Soil

sidedress

treatment. 2.1

lb ai/A G 3.8

lb ai/A

3.6

lb ai/cc 2/cc NS 48 h

### Page 60 of 191 SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

Granule applicator.

BEANS, DRIEDTYPE 90 day(s) preharvest interval. Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves. Do not apply directly to water, or to areas wher e surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More restrictive setbacks may apply. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipm ent or disposal of equipment wash waters. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste. Do not contaminate water, food or feed. Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not feed green forage, ha y, or straw to livestock. Do not graze dairy anim als in treated areas. Do not graze livestock in treated areas. Do not graze meat animals in treated areas. Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden. Do not use green pods as food for humans. Endangered species restriction. For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas wh ere surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Ground water restriction. Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches. Proper ventilation required. Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas. This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates. This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife. 

### For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil. 10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes w ithin 8 months after the last application. Geographic allowable: ID, MI, OR, WA only. Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ , NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band

treatment /Soil infurrow treatment.

Granule applicator. 2.1

lb ai/A G 2.1

lb ai/A

2.1

lb ai/cc 1/1 cc NS 48 h

PEANUTS (UNSPECIFIED) 90 day(s) preharvest interval. Do not make more than one application per cr op in states other th an AL, FL, GA, NC, OK, TX, and VA. Do not make split application to Spanish pe anuts or other short season varieties.

### Page 61 of 191 SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves. Do not allow livestock to graze treated areas before harvest. Do not apply directly to water, or to areas wher e surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More restrictive setbacks may apply. Do not apply when drift is likely to occur. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste. Do not contaminate water, food or feed. Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not feed hay or vines to livestock. Do not feed treated hay or vines to livestock. Do not graze dairy anim als in treated areas. Do not graze livestock in treated areas. Do not graze meat animals in treated areas. Do not hog down treated fields. Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden. Drift and runoff may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas. Endangered species restriction. For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas wh ere surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Ground water restrictions: If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in AL, GA and SC and a vulnerable soil is present and the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface, do not apply within 500 feet of a drinking water well unless wells are either cased to 100 feet below ground level or a minimum of 30 feet below the water table. If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 feet below ground surface, assume that the water table is less

than 25 feet below ground surface. If aldicarb is applied to peanuts in Florida and a vulnerable soil is present (see soils listed below), and the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface, do not apply within 500 feet of a drinking water well unless wells are either cased to 100 feet below ground level or a minimum of 30 feet below the water table. In Florida, it is the responsibility of the applicator to document the construction of wells claimed not to be shallow. This must consist of: (a) a copy of the well completion report issued by the appropriate water management district; or (b) a statement certified as to accuracy by a licensed

well contractor. The U.S.D.A. Natural Resour ces Conservation Service which serves your county can tell you if the soils on your farm fall within the following types of vulnerable soils. If it is not known whether the water table is greater than 25 feet below ground surface, assume that the water table is less than 25 feet below ground surface. Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches. Keep out of lakes, streams, and ponds. Proper ventilation required. Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas. This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates. This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife. For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil. 10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not

### Page 62 of 191 SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes w ithin 8 months after the last application. Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ , NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band

treatment /Soil infurrow treatment.

Granule applicator 3

lb ai/A G 3

lb ai/A

3

lb ai/cc 2/cc NS 48 h

At pegging

Soil band 1.5

lb ai/A G 3

lb ai/A

3

lb ai/cc 2/cc NS 48 h Geographic

allowable:
AL, FL, GA, NC, OK, TX, and VA only.

Do not make split application to Spanish

peanuts or

other short

season varieties.

Ensure that plant foliage is dry prior

to application. Dislodge granules from foliage by suitable

means that

will not damage the plant. Irrigate immediately

after application and complete

within 24

hours unless

rainfall is

received

### Page 63 of 191 SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

POTATO 100 day(s) preharvest interval for potatoes grown in FL. 150 day(s) preharvest interval for potatoes grown in ID, MT, OR, WA, and certain counties in NV (Humbolt and Pershing) and UT (Beaver, Boxelder, Cache, Carbon, Davis, Duchesne, Iron, Millard, Plute, Salt Lake , Sanpete, Sevier, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber). All application must be made with granular applicators which use Positive Displacement Metering Units. Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves. Do not allow livestock to graze treated areas before harvest. Do not apply directly to water, or to areas wher e surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More restrictive setbacks may apply. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipm ent or disposal of equipment wash waters. Do not contaminate water, food or feed. Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not graze dairy anim als in treated areas. Do not graze livestock in treated areas. Do not graze meat animals in treated areas. Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden. Endangered species restriction. For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas wh ere surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Ground water restriction. Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches. Proper ventilation required. Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas. This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates. This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife. For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil. 10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes w ithin 8 months after the last application. Geographic allowable: FL, ID , MT, OR, WA, and certain counties in NV (Humbolt and Pershing) and UT (Beaver, Boxelder, Cache, Carbon, Davis, Duchesne, Iron, Millard, Plute, Salt Lake, Sanpete, Sevier, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber). Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ , NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band

treatment /Soil

drill treatment

/Soil in-furrow

treatment.

Granule applicator. 3

lb ai/A G 3

lb ai/A

3

lb ai/cc 1/cc NS 48 h

### Page 64 of 191 SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

SOYBEANS (UNSPECIFIED) 90 day(s) preharvest interval. Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves. Do not allow livestock to graze treated areas before harvest. Do not apply directly to water, or to areas wher e surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More restrictive setbacks may apply. Do not apply to any body of water. Do not apply when drift is likely to occur. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste. Do not contaminate water, food or feed. Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not feed green forage, ha y, or straw to livestock. Do not graze dairy anim als in treated areas. Do not graze livestock in treated areas. Do not graze meat animals in treated areas. Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden. Endangered species restriction. For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas wh ere surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Ground water restriction. Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches. Proper ventilation required. Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas. This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates. This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife. For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil. 10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes w ithin 8 months after the last application. Geographic allowable: GA, NC, and SC only. Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ , NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band

treatment /Soil

drill treatment

/Soil in-furrow

treatment.

Granule applicator /Not on

label. 1.5

lb ai/A G 1.5

lb ai/A

1.5

lb ai/cc 1/cc NS 48 h

SUGAR BEET 120 day(s) preharvest interval if the tops are to be fed to livestock. 90 day(s) preharvest interval.

### Page 65 of 191 SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves. Do not apply directly to water, or to areas wher e surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More restrictive setbacks may apply. Do not apply when drift is likely to occur. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipm ent or disposal of equipment wash waters. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste. Do not contaminate water, food or feed. Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not graze dairy anim als in treated areas. Do not graze livestock in treated areas. Do not graze meat animals in treated areas. Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden. Do not use tops as food for humans. Endangered species restriction.

Ground water restriction. Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches. Proper ventilation required. Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas. This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates. This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife. For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil. 10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes w ithin 8 months after the last application. Geographic allowable: CA, CO, ID , MT, NE, OR, WA, and WY only. Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ , NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

Preplant

Soil band

treatment /Soil

drill treatment.

Granule applicator. 4.95

lb ai/A G 4.95

lb ai/A

4.95

lb ai/cc 3/cc NS 48 h

At planting

Soil band

treatment /Soil

drill treatment

/Soil in-furrow

treatment /Soil incorporated treatment by irrigation /Soil

sidedress 4.95

lb ai/A G 4.95

lb ai/A

4.95

lb ai/cc 3/cc NS 48 h

### Page 66 of 191 SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

treatment.

Granule applicator.

Postemergence

Soil in-furrow

treatment /Soil incorporated treatment by irrigation /Soil

sidedress

treatment /Soil

treatment.

Granule applicator. 4.05

lb ai/A G 4.95

lb ai/A

4.95

lb ai/cc 3/cc NS 48 h

SWEET

POTATO 120 day(s) preharvest interval. All application must be made with granular applicators which use Positive Displacement Metering Units. Apply only while wearing prescribed protective gloves. Do not allow the feeding of vines or grazing of foliage by livestock. Do not apply directly to water, or to areas wher e surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply this product to fields within 50 feet of wells used for drinking water. More restrictive setbacks may apply. Do not apply when drift is likely to occur. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of waste. Do not contaminate water, food or feed. Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal.

Do not feed treated vines to livestock. Do not graze dairy anim als in treated areas. Do not graze livestock in treated areas. Do not graze meat animals in treated areas. Do not store or use in or around the home or home garden. Endangered species restriction. For terrestrial uses, do not apply directly to water or to areas wh ere surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark.

Ground water restriction. Incorporate to a minimum depth of 2 inches. Proper ventilation required. Runoff from treated areas may be hazardous to aquatic organisms in neighboring areas. This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates. This product is highly toxic to birds, fish, and other wildlife. For all applications, immediately deep-disc any spills at row ends or elsewhere to ensure the granular is completely covered with a layer of soil. 10 months rotational/plant back crop restriction with the following exceptions: Do not plant wheat, barley, bulb crops, or brassica crops within 6 months after the last application. Do not

### Page 67 of 191 SITE NAME LIMITATIONS

Application Equipment, Timing, and Type (for any Reg.# at any rate) Max. Single Appl.

Rate Form Code(s) Max.

Seasonal

Rate Max. # Apps/ cc & yr M R I R E I PHI/PGI/PSI

Use

Limitations (May not apply to all Reg. #s)

plant corn, cucurbits, or fruiting vegetabes w ithin 8 months after the last application. Geographic allowable: LA and MS only. Geographic disallowable: CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ , NY, PA, RI, VT, WI, or in Del Norte or Humbolt counties in CA or in Curry County, OR.

At planting

Soil band

treatment.

Granule applicator. 3 lb ai/A G 3 lb ai/A

3 lb ai/cc 1/cc NS 48 h

### Page 68 of 191 Appendix B. Table of Generic Data Requi rements and Studies Used to Make the Reregistration Decision

Guide to Appendix B

Appendix B contains listing of data requireme nts which support the reregistration for active ingredients within case #0140 (ald icarb) covered by this RED. It contains generic data requirements that apply to aldi carb in all products, including data requirements for which a "typical formulation" is the test substance.

The data table is organized in the following formats:

1. Data Requirement (Column 1). The data requirement s are listed in the order in which they appear in 40 CFR part 158. The refere nce numbers accompanying each test refer to the test protocols set in the Pesticide Asse ssment Guidance, which are available from the National technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161 (703) 487-4650.

2. Use Pattern (Column 2). This column indicates the use patterns for which the data requirements apply. The following letter designa tions are used for the given use patterns.

A. Terrestrial food

B. Terrestrial feed

C. Terrestrial non-food

D. Aquatic food

E. Aquatic non-food outdoor

F. Aquatic non-food industrial

G. Aquatic non-food residential

H. Greenhouse food

I. Greenhouse non-food

J. Forestry

K. Residential

L. Indoor food

M. Indoor non-food

N. Indoor medical

O. Indoor residential

3. Bibliographic Citation (Column 3). If the Agency has acceptable data in its files, this column list the identify number of each study. This normally is the Master Record Identification (MIRD) number, but may be a "GS" number if no MRID number has been assigned. Refer to the Bibliography appendi x (Appendix D) for a complete citation of the study.Page 69 of 191New GuidelineNumberOld GuidelineNumberRequirementUse PatternBibliographic Citation(s)Product Chemistry830.1550 61-1 ProductIdentity and Composition A,B,C 00152095letter dated 8/12/86830.1600 61-2a Start. Mat. & Mfg. Process A,B,C 00152095830.1620 61-2b Description of Production Process A,B,C 00152095830.1670 61-2b Discussionof Impurities A,B,C 00152095830.1700 62-1 Preliminary Analysis A,B,C 00152095830.1750 62-2 Certification of limits A,B,C 00152095letter dated 8/12/86830.1800 62-3 Analytical Method A,B,C 00152095letter dated 8/12/86830.6302 63-2 Color A,B,C 00152095830.6303 63-3 Physical State A,B,C 00152095830.6304 63-4 Odor A,B,C 00152095830.6313 63-13 Stability tempand ions A,B,C 00152095830.6314 63-14 Oxidation and Reduction A,B,C 00152095830.6315 63-15 Flammability A,B,C 00152095830.6316 63-16 Explodability A,B,C 00152095830.6317 63.17 Storagestability A,B,C 00152095830.6319 63-19 Miscibility A,B,C 00152095830.6320 63-20 Corrosion Characteristics A,B,C 00152095830.7000 63-12 pH A,B,C 00152095830.7050 N/A UV/Visibleabsorption A,B,C 00152095Data Gap830.7100 63-18 Viscosity A,B,C 00152095830.7200 63-5 Melting point/melting range A,B,C 00152095830.7220 63-6 Boiling point/range A,B,C 00152095830.7300 63-7 Density A,B,C 00152095830.7370 63-10 Dissociation Constants in Water A,B,C 00152095830.7550 63-11 Partial Coefficient, shake flaskmethodA,B,C 00152095830.7840 63-8 Water Solubility A,B,C 00152095830.7950 63-9 Vapor Pressure A,B,C 00152095Environmental Fate835.2120 161-1 Hydrolysis A,B,C aldicarb:00053377 00096547 00102011 00102048 00102057 0010207200102065sulfoxide:00102066835.2240 161-2 Photodegradation Water A,B,C aldicarb: 00102067 00102068 42498201Page 70 of 191835.2410 161-3 Photodegradation Soil and Air A,B,C aldicarb:Waivedsulfoxide:Waivedsulfone:Waived835.4100 162-1 Aerobic Soil Metabolism A,B,C aldicarb: 00029989 00093641 00096968 00102050 0010191500102051 00102054 00035365 00101934 00102071 0005336600080820 00093640 00093642 43805702 44005001sulfone:00053370835.4400 162-3 Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism A,B,C aldicarb:43805701sulfoxide:45592110sulfone:45592111835.4300 162-4 Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism A,B,C aldicarb: N/Asulfoxide:45592108sulfone:45592109835.1240 163-1 Leaching/Adsorption/Desorption A,B,C aldicarb: 0005338000053381 00053385 001019150010193900102079 42498202sulfoxide:43560301sulfone:43560302835.6100 164-1 Terrestrial Field Dissipation A,B,C aldicarb: 00036313 00053364 00068252 00080815 0010191000101923 00101935 00101937 00102064 00101936 0010196800102061 00102078835.6200 164-2 Aquatic Field Dissipation A,B,C aldicarb: 00094799 00101940Environmental Fate – Drinking Water Monitoring Data835.7100 166-1 Prospective Ground waterMonitoring StudyA,B,C 46793702 46793703 46793704 46793705 46793706Ecological Effects850.2100 71-1a Avian Oral LD50 Quail/Duck A,B,C BOWOAL02107398 (Beavers/1979)850.2200 71-2a Avian Dietary LC50 Quail A,B,C 00102132 1096727 (Beavers/1979)850.2200 71-2b Avian Dietary LC50 Quail A,B,C096397 0022923 (Hill/1975)850.2300 71-4a Avian Reproduction Quail A,B,CData Gap850.2300 71-4b Avian Reproduction Duck A,B,CData Gap850.1075 72-1a Freshwater Fish LC50 Bluegill(warm water)A,B,C 40098001 3503 (Mayer and Ellersieck 1986)850.1075 72-1c Freshwater Fish LC50 Rainbowtrout (cold water)A,B,C 40098001 (Mayer and Ellersieck 1986)850.1010 72-2a Freshwater Invertebrate LC50DaphniamagnaA,B,C Acc # 096683 (Vilkas/1977) Foran et al. 1985Page 71 of 191850.1045 72-3a Estuarine/Marine Fish LC50 A,B,C 40228401 (USEPA/1986)850.1025 72-3b Estuarine/Marine Mollusk EC50 A,B,C 40228401 (USEPA/1986) 00066341 (USEPA/1981)850.1035 72-3c Estuarine/Marine Shrimp EC50 A,B,C 40228401 (USEPA/1986)850.1400 72-4a Fish Early Life-Stage (freshwater)A,B,C 44598601 (Pickering andGilliam 1982) 66341 (USEPA/1981)850.1400 72-4a Fish Early Life-Stage(estuarine/marine)A,B,C 44598601 (Pickering andGilliam 1982) 66341 (USEPA/1981)850.1300 72-4b Aquatic Invertebrate Life-Cycle(freshwater)A,B,C 00066341 (USEPA/1981)850.1350 72-4b Aquatic Invertebrate Life-Cycle(estuarine/marine)A,B,C 00066341 (USEPA/1981)123-2 Aquatic Plant Growth A,B,C 40228401 (USEPA/1986)850.4100 N/A Terrestrial Plant Toxicity(seedling emergence)A,B,CData Gap850.4150 N/A Terrestrial Plant Toxicity(vegetative vigor)A,B,CData Gap850.4400 122-2 Aquatic Plant Growth (Tier 2) A,B,CData Gap850.3020 141-1 Honey Bee Acute Contact LD50 A,B,C 00036935 (Atkins/1975)N/A N/A OECD, Section 2 #207Earthworm Acute Toxicity TestA,B,C Mosleh (2003)Residue Chemistry860.1300 171-4a Nature of Residue in Plants A,B,C 00053358 00053364 00053366 00053368 00085455 0010192900101930 00101931 00101977 00101996 00102009 0010217842436602-42436606 43902401860.1300 171-4b Nature of Residue in Livestock A,B,C 00053371 00053373 00080697 00080813 00101933 0010196700159570 43084101860.1340 171-4c Residue Analytical Method plant A,B,C 00025167 00036315 00069739 00069740 00101973 0010197800101992 00101993 00101997 00101998 00101999 0010200400102005 00102007 00104553 00135031 00140487 42436501860.1340 171-4d Residue Analytical MethodlivestockA,B,C 00101924 00101990 00101991860.1340 171-4d Residue Analytical Methodwater/fishA,B,C N/A860.1360 171-4m Multiple Residue Methods A,B,C PAM Volume I Section 302 and 401Page 72 of 191860.1380 171-4e Storage Stability Data A,B,C PP#0F1008PP#9F0798 PP#3F1414PP#7E1996 PP#6F1953PP#7F1995 PP#8F2107 PP#8F0637 PP#9F2201 PP#6E1792PP#8F2096 FAP#6H5108 00159571 42467301 4246730243844701 43842401 43299005 43299006860.1400 171-4h Nature and Magnitude of theResidue in Water, Fish andIrrigated CropsA,B,C N/A860.1460 171-4i Magnitude of the Residue in FoodHandling EstablishmentsA,B,C N/A860.1480 171-4j Milk andthe Fat, Meat, and MeatByproducts of Cattle, Goats,Hogs, Horses, and SheepA,B,C 00053372 00101967 PP#3F1414860.1480 171-4j Eggs and the Fat, Meat, and MeatByproducts of PoultryA,B,C 00053373860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (potato) A,B,C 00080815 00102012 00102014 00102172 00164424 42827802-42827804 43299002 43385001860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (sugarbeet, roots)A,B,C 00035368 00035369 00101966860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (sweetpotato)A,B,C PP#7F1995 42722301860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (sugarbeet, tops)A,B,C 00035368 00035369 00101966860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (beans,dry)A,B,C 00135031860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (soybean,seed and aspirated grain fractions)A,B,C 00135031860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (soybean,forage and soybean, hay)A,B,C N/A860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue(grapefruit)A,B,C 00102129 00148971860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (lemon) A,B,C 00102129860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (lime) A,B,C 00102129860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (orange) A,B,C 00036313 00102075 00102115 00102174 42004401 4201690143110601860.1500 171-4k Magnitude ofResidue (pecan) A,B,C 00140487Page 73 of 191860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (sorghum,grain and aspirated grainfractions)A,B,C PP#8F2107860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (sorghum,forage and sorghum, stover(fodder))A,B,C PP#8F2107860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (coffee,bean)A,B,C 00102024 PP#7F1953860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (cotton,seed and cotton gin by-products)A,B,C 00101977 00102061 PP#7F1995 PP#9F0798Data Gap860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (peanut,nutmeat and peanut, hulls)A,B,C 00102013 PP#3F1414860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue(sugarcane)A,B,C 00101923 PP#2F1188860.1500 171-4k Magnitude of Residue (tobacco) A,B,C 00102179 00102180860.1520 171-4l Processed Food/Feed (citrus) A,B,C 00102114 00102130 00140001860.1520 171-4l Processed Food/Feed (coffee,bean)A,B,C PP#7F1953 00162562860.1520 171-4l Processed Food/Feed (cottonseed) A,B,C 00101977 00102061860.1520 171-4l Processed Food/Feed (peanut) A,B,C 00102123 PP#3F1414860.1520 171-4l Processed Food/Feed (potato) A,B,C 00080815 00102012 00102014 00102172 00164424 0015957242305801 42827801 43299004860.1520 171-4l Processed Food/Feed (sorghum) A,B,C PP#8F2107860.1520 171-4l Processed Food/Feed (soybean) A,B,C 00135031 00159573 40884601860.1520 171-4l Processed Food/Feed (sugar beet) A,B,C 00035368 00035369 00101966860.1520 171-4l Processed Food/Feed (sugarcane) A,B,C 00101923 PP#2F1188860.1850 165-1 Confined rotational crops A,B,C 42226201860.1900 165-2 Field rotational crops A,B,C 42226201Toxicology870.1100 81-1 Acute Oral Toxicity Rat A,B,C 00057333870.1200 81-2 Acute Dermal Toxicity Rabbit/Rat A,B,C 00091241 00069916870.1300 81-3 Acute Inhalation Toxicity Rat A,B,C 00069916 00057333870.2400 81-4 Primary Eye Irritation Rabbit A,B,C 00069916870.2500 81-5 Primary Skin Irritation A,B,C 00069916870.2600 81-6 DermalSensitization A,B,C N/A870.3150 82-1b 13-Day Dietary Dog A,B,C 41919901Page 74 of 191870.3700a 83-3a Developmental Toxicity(Teratogenicity) RatA,B,C 41004501870.3700b 83-3b Developmental Toxicity(Teratogenicity) RabbitA,B,C 0132668870.3800 83-4 2-Generation Reproduction Rat A,B,C 42148401870.4100a 83-1 Chronic Toxicity Rat A,B,C 43045401870.4100b 83-1 Chronic Toxicity Dog A,B,C 40695401 42191501870.4200 83-2 Carcinogenicity Rat A,B,C 43045401870.4300 83-5 Chronic Toxicity/CarcinogenicityMouse and RatA,B,C 00044732 00044733 00044734870-5300 Gene Mutation A,B,C 00148168870.5385 84-2 Mammalian Cytogenetics: BoneMarrow Chromosome AberrationA,B,C 41661301 41663102870.5550 84-2 Unscheduled DNA Synthesis inMammalian CellsA,B,C 00141673870.6200a Acute Neurotoxicity ScreeningBatteryA,B,C 43442301870.6200b Subchronic NeurotoxicityScreening BatteryA,B,C 43829602870.6300 Developmental Neurotoxicity A,B,C 43829601870.7485 Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics A,B,C 00102022 00102023N/A N/A Rat Dominant Lethal Study A,B,C 43575101N/A N/ASpecial Neurotoxicity Studies:Moser VCA,B,C 45068601 (1999) TAP 157 94-106N/A N/AAcute Oral Study (Human)InvereskA,B,C42373001 (1992)46131001 (supplementary report)Special Study N/AComparative CholinesteraseAssayA, B,CData GapOccupational/Residue ExposureN/A N/A Aldicarb Specific Study A,B,C43852501N/A N/A Terbufos Study A,B,C44793301

### Page 75 of 191 Appendix C. Technical Support Documents

Additional documentation in support of this RED is maintained in the OPP docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005- 0253. This docket may be accessed in the OPP docket room located at Room S- 4900, One Potomac Yard, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. It is open Mo nday through Friday, exclud ing Federal holidays, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. All documents may be viewed in the OPP docket room or downloaded or viewed via the Internet at the following site: http://www.regulations.gov.

The docket initially contained preliminary risk a ssessments, supporting documents, and technical (or manufacturing-use) registrant error comments for aldicarb as of November 14, 2006. After a sixty-day public comment period, EPA considered the public comments that were submitted to the docket and revised the risk assessments as necessary. The revi sed risk assessments, any supporting documents that needed to be revised, impact assessments, and memos describing the the Biological and Economic Assessment Division (BEAD), Environmental Fate an d Effects Division (EFE D), and Health Effects Division (HED) response to public comments will be added to the docket on September 26, 2006.



### The Agency documents in the docket include:

1. Federal Register Notice: Aldicarb Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision; Notice of Availability.

2. Reader’s Guide to the Aldicarb E-Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163.

3. Reregistration Eligibility Decisi on (RED) Document for Aldicarb.

4. BEAD Response to Comments Submitted to Docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163.

5. Quantitative Impact Analysis for At-peg Application of Aldicarb to Peanuts (DP 337549).

6. Significance of Aldicarb Use in the Produc tion of Dry Beans, Soybeans, Pecans, Sweet Potatoes, Cotton and Citrus.

7. EFED Response to Public Comments for Aldicarb RED: Docket ID# Opp-2005-

0163-0176.

8. Aldicarb - Ecological risk results for altern ative application rate and incorporation

efficiencies.

9. Use of Aldicarb for Lygus Bug Suppressi on, Aphids, and Mites on Alfalfa Grown

for Seed Production.

10. Use of Aldicarb for Leaf Minors on Coffee, for Nematodes on Coffee and Sugarcane, and for Aphids and Flea Beatles on Tobacco.

### Page 76 of 191 11. Review of “A Retrospective Ground Wate r Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and Its

Metabolites in the South eastern United States (MRID 467937-06); Mississippi Delta (MRID 467937-05); Texas (MRI D 467937-04); California (MRID 467937- 03); and Pacific Northwest (MRID 467937-02).

12. ADDENDUM to: Aldicarb - Ecological ri sk results for alte rnative application rate and incorporation efficiencies

13. Aldicarb (List A Case 0140, Chemical ID No. 098301). HED Response to Comments Received During the Public Comment Period.

14. HED Revised Human Health Risk Assessment for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document (RED).

### Page 77 of 191 Appendix D. Citations Considered to be Part of the Database Supporting the Reregistration Decision (Bibliography)

Guide to Appendix D

1. Contents of Bibliography . This bibliography contains citations of all studies considered relevant by EPA in arriving at the positions and conclusions stated elsewhere in the Reregistration Eligibility Document. Primary sources for studies in this bibliography have been the body of data submitted to EPA and its predecessor agencies in support of past regulatory decisions . Selections from other sources including the published liter ature, in those instances where they have been considered, are included.

2. Units of Entry . The unit of entry in this bibliography is called a "study." In the case of published materials, this corresponds closely to an article. In the case of unpublished materials submitted to the Agen cy, the Agency has sought to identify documents at a level parallel to the published article from within the typically larger volumes in which they were submitted. The resulting "studies" generally have a distinct title (or at least a single subject), can stand alone for purposes of

review and can be described with a c onventional bibliographic citation. The Agency has also attempted to unite basic documents and commentaries upon them, treating them as a single study.

3. Identification of Entry . The entries in this biblio graphy are sorted numerically by Master Record Identifier, or "MRID” number. This number is unique to the citation, and should be used whenever a spec ific reference is required. It is not related to the six-digit "Accession Numbe r" which has been used to identify volumes of submitted studies (see paragraph 4(d)(4) below for further explanation). In a few cases, entries added to the bibliography late in the review may be preceded by a nine character temporar y identifier. These entries are listed after all MRID entries. This temporary identifying number is also to be used whenever specific reference is needed.

4. Form of Entry . In addition to the Master Reco rd Identifier (MRID), each entry consists of a citation containing standard elements followed, in the case of material submitted to EPA, by a description of the earliest known submission. Bibliographic conventions used reflect the standard of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), expanded to provide for certain special needs.

a. Author. Whenever the author could c onfidently be identified, the Agency has chosen to show a personal author . When no individual was identified, the Agency has shown an identifiable laboratory or testi ng facility as the author. When no author or laboratory could be identified, the Agency has

shown the first submitter as the author.

b. Document date. The date of the study is taken directly from the document. When the date is followed by a question mark, the bibliographer has deduced the date from the evidence contained in the

### Page 78 of 191 document. When the date appears as (1999), the Agency was unable to

determine or estimate the date of the document.

c. Title. In some cases, it has been necessary for the Agency bibliographers to create or enhance a document title. Any such editorial insertions are contained between square brackets.

d. Trailing parentheses. For studies submitted to the Agency in the past, the trailing parentheses include (in additi on to any self-explanatory text) the following elements describing th e earliest known submission:

(1) Submission date. The date of the earliest known submission appears immediately following the word "received."

(2) Administrative number. The next element immediately following the word "under" is the registra tion number, experimental use permit number, petition number, or other administrative number

associated with the earliest known submission.

(3) Submitter. The third element is th e submitter. When authorship is defaulted to the submitter, this element is omitted.

(4) Volume Identification (Accession Numbers). The final element in the trailing parentheses identifie s the EPA accession number of the volume in which the original submission of the study appears. The six-digit accession number follows the symbol "CDL," which stands for "Company Data Library." This accession number is in turn followed by an alphabetic suffix which shows the relative position of the study within the volume.

### Page 79 of 191 Bibliography

6300 Hiddleson, L.; Bishop, J.P. (1966) Report No. 07 4566-045. (Unpublishe d study received Mar 24, 1976 under 359-620; submitted by Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., Monmouth Junction, N.J.; CDL:095197-I)

6606 Butts, R.F.; Simpson, G.W. (1969) Zolone EC--Potatoes: Final Report No. BB 69-60. (Unpublished study received Dec 7, 1972 under 3F1337; prepar ed in cooperation with Univ. of Maine, Entomology Dept., submitted by Rhodia, Inc., New Brunswick, N.J.; CDL: 094849-AD)

6618 Wang, D.; Bacon, O.G. (1971) Zolone EC--Potatoes: Final Report No. FW 71-52. (Unpublished study received Dec 7, 1972 under 3F1337; prepar ed in cooperation with Univ. of California--Davis, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Rhodia, Inc., New Brunswick, N.J.; CDL:094849-AR)

6848 Stafford, E. (1966) Report No. PA 66 -46. (Unpublished study r eceived Jul 5, 1968 under 8F0668; submitted by Chipman Chemical Co., Inc., Burlingame, Calif.; CDL:092027-BG)

6962 Pollet, D.K.; Aitken, J.B. (1977) Pest contro l for kernal pecans. Pecan South (Apr):138-140. (AlsoInunpublis hed submissi on received Jun 9, 1977 under 359-620; submitted by RhonePoulenc, Inc., Monmouth Junction, N.J.; CDL:230375-T)

7727 Jenkins, L.E. (1974) Evaluation of Insecticid es for Control of Insects on Dry Beans, 1974. (Unpublished study received Mar 31, 1975 under 20 1-347; prepared by Co lorado State Univ., Bay Farm Experiment Station, Dept. of Z oology-Entomology, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:223468-AK)

7741 Reynolds, H.T. (1971) Biological Effects of Lannate and Fundal/ Galecron Applied to Cotton for Residue Analysis. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by Univ. of California--Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology; submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:232404-P)

7750 Pfrimmer, T.R. (1974) Results of Insecticide Tests with Materials Furnished by the Shell Chemical Company. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Delta States Agricultural Research Center, Bioenvironmental Insect Control Laboratory, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:232404-AI)

7808 Reed, J.A. (196 9) Potato Plots--1969. (Unpublished study received Feb 28, 1972 under 352- 342; prepared by Rutgers Univ., submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL: 003033-L)

7816 Watson, T.F.; Barnes, K.K.; Fullerton, D.G.; et al. (1970) Field and Laboratory Investigations on Cotton Insects in Arizona: 1970. (Summary report prepared for Cotton Insects Research and Control Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, Jan 12 and 13, 1971. Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1972 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of Arizona, Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003040-I)

7828 Evans, A.W.; Pate, T. (1966) Thrips Infestations, Average Plant Heights, Average Stand Counts, Rates of Technical Materials in Ounces, Type of Treatments and Insecticides Used in Thrips Test at Clarksdale, Mississippi during 1966: Table 1. (Unpublished study received Oct 15, 1968 under 352-342; prepared in cooperation with Mississippi State Univ., submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003003-D)

### Page 80 of 191 8096 Brodie, B.B. (1968) The Effects of Nematicidesic Treatments on Yield of Flue-Cured Tobacco, Tifton, Georgia 1968 . (Unpublished study received Apr 22, 1969 under 352-342; prepared by U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003007-F)

8129 Watson, T.F. (1972) Field and Laboratory Investigations on Cotton Insects in Arizona. (Summary report prepared for Cotton Insect Research and Control Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, Jan 9 and 10, 1973; unpublished st udy received May 24, 1 976 under 352-342; submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:225098-K)

8256 Todd, J. (1970) Protection of Seedling Soybeans from Damage by Lesser Cornstalk Borer and/or Three-Cornered Alfalfa Hopper with Granular Insecticides. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976 under 201- 347; prepared by Georgia Experi ment Station, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washingt on, D.C.; CDL:232405-AL)

8298 Bacon, O.G.; McCalley, N. (1966) Control of the Potato Tuberworm. (Unpublished study received Jan 21, 1970 under 0F0 886; prepared by Univ. of Ca lifornia--Davis, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:091530-R)

8317 Reed, J.P. (1969) Potato In sect Control Test. (Unpublished st udy received Jan 21, 1970 under 0F0886; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Entomology and Zoology, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:091530-AH)

8606 Radcliffe, E.B. (1973 ) 1973 Potato Insecticide Trials, Rosemount, Minnesota. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1977 under 352-342; pr epared by Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Entomology, Fisheries, and Wildlife, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:231911-E)

8639 Bacon, O.G.; McCalley, N. (1966) Green Peach Aphid Popul ations Occurring on Potato Foliage in Plots Treated for Control of the Potato Tuberworm. (Unp ublished study received Nov 16, 1971 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of California--Davis, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL: 003031-O)

8924 Polles, S.G. (1973) Results of Efficacy Studies Using La nnate and Various Insecticides on Pecan Trees. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 35 2-342; submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:095289-H)

9073 Stier, E.F. (1969) Fl avor Evaluation Report on Potatoes . (Unpublished study received Jan 21, 1970 under 0F0886; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Food Science, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:091530-H)

9103 Thurston, R. (1968) Effect of Granular and Foliar Insecticides on Leaf Damage by Tobacco Hornworms: Table 4. (Unpublished study received Feb 12, 1970 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of Kentucky, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:003013-E)

9247 Morishita, P. (1 973) Thrips Control with Systemics. (Unpublished study received Aug 25, 1976 under 352-342; prepared by Univ. of California--Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:227322-M)

10163 Wells, J.C. (1970) Peanut Nematocide Test --1970. (Unpublished study including letter dated Oct 22, 1970 from J.C. We lls to Bill Wilner, received Oct 5, 1973 under 3G1359; prepared by North Carolina State Univ., Agricultural Extension Service, Dept. of Plant Pathology, submitted by PPG Industries, Inc., Chemical Div., Pittsburgh, Pa.; CDL:093629-I)

### Page 81 of 191 11390 Schulz, J.T.; Kamali, K.; Ehart, R. (1971) Bi ology, Ecology and Control of Sunflower Insects. (Unpublished study received Jun 4, 1974 under 100-501; prepared by North Dakota State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:094016-G)

11418 Pollet, D.K. (1975) Pecan Demonstration Orchard Treatments, 1975. (Unpublished study including letter dated Dec 17, 1976 from D.K. Pollet and J.B. Aitken to Steve Dumford, received Dec 22, 1977 under 1 00-501; prepared by Clemson Un iv., Cooperative Extension Service, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232600-G)

11419 Pollet, D.K. (1976) Control of pecan weevil shuckworm and aphid in South Carolina. Pecan South (Jun):408-411. (AlsoInunp ublished submission received De c 22, 1977 under 100-501; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232600-H)

11873 Mistric, W.J. (1966) Report of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. Regarding Cigarette Smoke Tests Made on Samples of Cured Tobacco from Field Experiments in 1965: Table 2. (Unpublished study including letters dated Dec 3, 1965 from R. Wenger to Walter J. Mistric and Sep 20, 1965 from to Thomas D. Lowman, received D ec 28, 1971 under 100-501 ; prepared by North Carolina State Univ. in coopera tion with R.J. Reynolds Tob acco Co., submitted by CibaGeigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:000539-L)

11893 Armbrust, E.J.; Cothran, W.R.; Wood, T.K.; et al. (1966) Early Spring Insecticide Applications for Alfalfa Weevil Control. (U npublished study received Oct 22, 1972 under 100-501; prepared by Cornell Univ., Dept. of Entomology and Limnology, Div. of Forage and Cereal Insect Investigations, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:000536-G)

12428 Gerhardt, P.D. (1965) Insect Control Inves tigations on Potatoes: Project 418. (Unpublished study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; prepared by Univ. of Arizona, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-D)

12435 Wells, A.; Wagner, D. (1967) Insecticide Evaluation on Potatoes-1967. (Unpublished study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; submitte d by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-O)

12438 Radcliffe, E.B. (1 965) 1965 Potato Data. (Unpublished study receive d Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; prepared by Univ. of Minnesota, De pt. of Entomology, Fisheries, and Wildlife, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-R)

12440 Radcliffe, E.B. (1968) Control of Insect Pests of Potato with Various Rates and Formulations of Several Insecticides: Table 1. (Unpublishe d study received Nov 10 , 1972 under 3F1323; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-T)

12444 Reed, J.P.; Stier, E.F. (1965) Potato Insect Control Tests--1965. (Unpublis hed study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Entomology and Economic Zoology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-X)

12539 Bacon, O.G. (1965) Ecology, Biology and Control of Insects and Mites Affecting the Seed Production of Alflafasic, Clovers and Other Sma ll Seeded Legumes in California: Project No. H1735. (Unpublished st udy received May 8, 1970 under 0F0892; prepared by Univ. of California--Davis, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Geigy Chemical Corp., Ardsley, N.Y.; CDL:091543-J)

### Page 82 of 191 12561 Lawatsch, D.J.; Buchholz, C. (1968) Alfalfa Weevil Test. (Unpublished study including letter dated Jun 26, 1968 from D.J. Lawatsch to A.A. Di Edwardo, recei ved May 8, 1970 under 0F0892; submitted by Geigy Chemical Corp., Ardsley, N.Y.; CDL:091543-AQ)

12933 Heald, C.M.; Thames, W.H. (1969) Effect of Nematicides on Yield of Cotton Infected withRotylenchulus reniformis. (Unpublished study including letters dated Nov 17, 1969 from C.M. Heald to Clyde W. McBeth and Dec 2, 1969 from J.M. McBride to R.B. Boren, received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Crops Research Div., submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-E)

12948 Jorgenson, E.C. (1968) Yield of Treated Sugarbeets. (Unpublished study including letters dated Dec 6, 1968 from E.C. Jorgenson to Stanley T. Ichikawa and Jan 20, 1969 from J.L. Reed to Supervisor, New York Agricultural Chemicals Div., Pesticide Development Dept., Agronomics Herbicides, Nematocides and Fungicides, received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Serv ice, Crops Research Div., Crops Research Laboratory, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-X)

12950 Ruppel, R.F.; Fogg, R.; Gomulinski, M.S.; et al. (1968) Sugar Beet Nematode, Granules, 1968. (Unpublished study received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-Z)

12959 Thomas, W.O.; Green, H.B. (1967) Insecticid al Control of Insects A ttacking Southern Peas: Project No. SZ-10. (Unpublished study including letter dated Feb 10, 1969 from R. Boren to Supervisor, New York, Agricultural Chemicals Div., Pesticide Development, Agronomic Insecticides, received Oct 5, 1971 under 201-119; prepared by Mississippi State Univ., Truck Crops Branch Experiment Station, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 000777-AI)

12960 Thomas, W.O.; Green, H.B. (1967) Control of Soil Insects Attacking Sweet Potatoes: Project No. SZ-11. (Unpublished study r eceived Oct 5, 1971 under 201-11 9; prepared by Mississippi State Univ., Truck Crops Branch Experiment Station, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-AJ)

12978 Brodie, B.B. (1966) Evaluation of Potentia l Properitary sic Chemicals for Root-Knot Control

of Tobacco--196 6. (Unpublished study received Oct 5, 19 71 under 201-119; pr epared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Crops Resear ch Div., Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Nematology Investigations, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000777-BC)

13020 Miller, P.M. (1963) Tob acco Cyst Nematode Control. (Unpublishe d study received on unknown date under 2139-76; prepared by Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc., Woodstock, Ill.; CDL:025254-G)

13076 Martin, W.J.; Birchfield, W. (1968) Meloidogyne incognitaGroup. (Unpublished study received Oct 6, 1969 under 464 -379; submitted by Dow Chemi cal U.S.A., Midland, Mich.; CDL:003591-E)

13077 Martin, W.J.; Birchfield, W. (1968) Rotylenchulus reniform is: Efficacy of Nematocides on Sweet Potatoes: #8714. Unpublished study. 27 p.

13079 Martin, W.J.; Birchfield, W. (1968)Meloidogyne incognitaGroup and Streptomyces ipomoea. (Unpublished study receive d Oct 6, 1969 under 464-379; s ubmitted by Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Mich.; CDL:003591-H)

### Page 83 of 191 13090 Graham, T.W. (1968) 1968 Field Nematocide Tests for Control of Tobacco Nematodes. (Unpublished study including letter dated Sep 12, 1968 from T.W. Graham to Cooperators, received Oct 6, 1969 under 464-379; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Tobacco Breeding and Di sease Investigations, submitted by Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Mich.; CDL:003590-T)

13794 Thompson, H.E. (1966) Elm Leaf Beetle Control in Kansas: 1961-1966. (Unpublished study including letter dated Feb 2, 1967 from H.E. Thompson to J.J. Mauget Co., received Nov 21, 1967 under 7946-1; prepared by Kansas State Univ., Dept. of Entomology, submitted by J.J. Mauget Co., Burbank, Calif.; CDL:008103-AC)

13797 Arnett, W.H. (1965) Elm Leaf Beetle Control with Systemic Chemicals: Report No. 18098. (Unpublished study received Nov 21, 1967 under 7946-1; prepared by Univ. of Nevada for Chemagro Corp., submitted by J.J. Mauget Co., Burbank, Calif.; CDL: 008103-AM)

13962 Walton, R.R.; Burton, R.L. (1963) The Use of Systemic Insecticides for the Control of the Nantucket Pine Moth, Rhyacionia frustrana(Comst.), on Pines in Oklahoma, 1962-63. (Unpublished study received Jun 26, 1967 under 20 1-229; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ., Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:000938-W)

13987 Brooks, R.F. (1968) Spiral Aphid: Test No.: RF 58. (Unpublished study including letter dated Nov 25, 1968 from R.F. Brooks to Jack T. Re inhardt, received Feb 3, 1977 under 201-274; prepared by Univ. of Florida, Institute of Fo od and Agricultural Sciences, Citrus Experiment Station, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:095827-H)

14394 Stier, E.F. (1965) Flavor Evaluation Repo rt on Potatoes. (Unpublis hed study received Nov 10, 1972 under 3F1323; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:093552-CF)

14455 Brodie, B.B.; Dukes, P.D. (1966) Fiel d Performance of Selected Nematocides and Soil Fumigants: Line Project No.: CR f2-16. (Unpublished study r eceived Oct 5, 1971 under 201- 119; prepared by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Crops Research Div., Georgia Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Nematology Investigations, submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 000777-BB)

14458 North Carolina State Univ ersity, Research on Wheels (1 965) Tobacco Summary Report of 1965 Data. Raleigh, N.C.: NCSU. (Plant pathology information note no. 133; alsoInunpublished submission r eceived Nov 11, 1966 under 46 4-240; submitted by Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland, Mich.; CDL:003480-A)

14927 Schaefer, R.; Koehler, C.; Kirby, M. (1975) Control of Greenhouse Whiteflies with Multiple Applications. (Unpublished study received Jul 12, 1977 under 239-EX-67; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California--Berkeley, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Chevron Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:233115-E)

14949 Sleesman, J.P. (1972) Vegetable Insect Control Experiments. Wooster: Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Dept. of Entomology. (Ent. misc. publication 73-1; report no. 36258; pp. 1-6,11-17 only; also In unpublished submission received Jul 24, 1973 under 4F1424; submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Agricultural Div., Kansas City, Mo.; CDL:094861-I)

15140 Cooledge, C.Y.; Murphy, D.W.; Mau, R.F.L. (1978) Orthene Use on Various Plants. (Unpublished study received Dec 21, 1978 unde r 239-2427; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of Hawaii, Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by Chevron Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:236631-M)

### Page 84 of 191 15141 Murphy, D.W.; Oetting, R. (1977) Mealybug, Greenhouse Foliage Plants, Compressed Air Spray, One Application. (Unpub lished study received Dec 21, 19 78 under 239-2427; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California--Riverside, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Chevron Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL: 236631-N)

15285 Goyer, R. (1972) Orthene 75 S: Artificial Diet. (Unpublis hed study received Jun 30, 1975 under 239-2443; prepared in cooperation with Cornell Univ., Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Chevron Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:222345-D)

15973 Bass, M.H.; Guthrie, C.D.; Cobb, P.P.; et al. (1972) Annual Report for Period Jan. 1 to Dec.31, 1972: Biology and Control of Insect Pests of Soybeans and Peanuts: Ala-274, RRF Ala295, S-74. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by Auburn Univ., Zoology-Entomology Dept., submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:232408-N)

16013 Sorensen, K.A. (1973) Fruit and Vegetable Insects. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1976 under 201-347; prepared by North Carolina St ate Univ., submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:232410-V)

20129 Riverside Chemical Company (1967) Effect of Combinations of Herbicides and Systemic Insecticides on Cotton Planted April 24, 1967. (Unpublished study received Sep 26, 1968 under 9779-93; CDL:227188-P)

20600 Arnold, E.; Wells, A. (1967) Report No. C 67-42. (Unpublished study received Dec 8, 1967 under 8F0668; submitted by Chipman Chemical Co., Inc., Burlingame, Calif; CDL:092961- H)

22444 Waddill, V. (1977) Evaluation of insecticides for control of insect pests of tomatoes, 1977. Insecticide and Avaricide Tests 3: 109. (A lsoInunpublished submi ssion received Mar 26, 1979 under 352-342; submitted by E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:237888-I)

25162 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1979) Magnitude of the Residue. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264330; CDL:099219-A)

25163 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1976) Nature of the Residue. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 un der 264330; CDL:099219-B)

25164 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1975) Safety to the Consumer. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 un der 264330; CDL:099219-C)

25165 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1978) Description of the Analytical Methods. Summary of studies 099219-E an d 099219F. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264-330; CDL:099219-D)

25166 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1978) A Method for the Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Grapes. Method Aldicarb-FPD-General dated Aug 1978. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1 980 under 264-330; CDL:099219-E)

25167 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1977) A Confirmatory Procedure for the Identification of Aldicarb Residues by Gas Chromatography Utilizing a Non-polar Column.

Method AldicarbFPD-C onfirmatory dated Feb 1977. (Unp ublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 264-330; CDL:099219-F)

### Page 85 of 191 25168 Cox, J.A.; Jubb, G. L., Jr.; Taschenberg, E.F.; et al. (1 978) Efficacy Data. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under 2643 30; prepared in cooperation w ith Pennsylvania State Univ., Vineyard Experiment Station and others, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:099220-A)

25487 Allen, W.W.; Johnson, R.; Morishita, F.S.; et al. (1979) Efficacy and Phytotoxicity. (Unpublished study received Jan 23, 1980 under MN 80/1; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California--Berkeley, Dept. of Entomology and others, submitted by state of Minnesota for Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, N.J.; CDL: 241667-A)

25511 Back, R.C. (1979) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: The Long Island Water Situation. (Unpublished study received Jan 30, 1980 un der 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 241702-A)

28644 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Comp any (1980) Aldicarb Pesticide Mechanism of Action and Therapy: Part II. (Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330; CDL:241639-A)

28645 Maronpot, R.R. (1980) Effect of a Single Peroral Dose of Aldicarb on Cholinesterase Inhibition and Recovery in the Rat: Project Re port 43-2. (Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:241639-B)

28646 Maronpot, R.R. (1980) Effect of a Single Peroral Dose of Aldicarb on Cholinesterase Inhibition and Recovery in th e Rabbit: Project Report 43-3. (Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by Carnegie-M ellon Univ., Institute of Research, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa; CDL:241639-C)

28647 Maronpot, R.R. (1980) Effect of a Single Oral Dose of Aldicarb on Cholinesterase Inhibition and Recovery in the Dog: Project Report 43- 4. (Unpublished study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264330; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ ., Institute of Research, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:241639-D)

28648 Panasevich, R.E.; Matthews, R.J. (1980) The Effects of Aldicarb #2 DEQ-85 upon Endogenous and Exogenous Acetylcholine When Administered at Threshold Doses: Study No. PH-234-OC-001-79. (Unpublis hed study received Jan 22, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by Pharmakon Laboratories, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:241639-E)

28811 Landis, B.J.; Jemmett, D.; Onsager, ; et al. (1971) Efficacy Data for Control of Wireworms in Potatoes. (Unpublished study including test nos. SI-25-P-72, SI-26-P-72, SI-96-P-71..., received Nov 20, 1972 under 476-1995; prepar ed in cooperation with U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div. and others, submitted by Stauffer Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif .; CDL:003842-K)

28813 Sullivan, P.; Wright, J.; Gold, L.; et al. (197 2) Soil Insecticide Field Test Data: Test No. I336-JW-72. (Unpublished study including test nos. I-334-JW-72, I-333-JW-72, I-332-JW72..., received Nov 20, 1972 un der 476-1995; prepared in co operation with United States Sugar Corp. and others, submitted by Stauffer Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:003842- M)

29290 Union Carbide Corporation (1967) Performance Data Temik 10G--Cotton. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 und er 1016-69; CD L:005587-A)

### Page 86 of 191 29291 Union Carbide Corporation (19) The Name, Chemical, Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik. (Unpublished st udy received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-B)

29292 Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Determination of Technical Temik 2-Methyl-2- (methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl) oxime and Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide by Infrared Analysis. Method 64C-21V5-K46 dated Oct 25, 1968. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 unde r 1016-69; CDL:005587-C)

29293 Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chem ical: Temik. (Unpublished stud y received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-D)

29294 Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Metabolis m and Toxicity of Metabolites. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 und er 1016-69; CDL:005587-E)

29295 Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Toxicity of the Formulated Product Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-6 9; CDL:005587-F)

29296 Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Metabolis m in Plants. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-G)

29297 Beckham, C.M.; Brooks, O.; Cowan, C.B.; et al. (1968) Introduction. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of Georgia and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:005587-H)

29298 Union Carbide Corporation (19) Cotton Foliage and Systemic Activity. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-I)

29299 Clarkson, V.A.; Fronek, F.; Bariola, L.A. (1968) Residue Data for Temik in Soil. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; prepared in cooperation with Grower Services, Inc. and U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:005587-J)

29300 Union Carbide Corporation (19) Description of Analytical Methods. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL: 005587-K)

29301 Union Carbide Corporation (19) Practical Methods for Removing Residues That Exceed Any Proposed Tolerance: Temik. (Unpublished study received Fe b 6, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:005587-L)

29302 Union Carbide Corporation (19) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik. (Unpublished study received Feb 6, 1969 under 101 6-69; CDL:005587-M)

29323 Bass, M.H.; Johnson, S.J.; Chiu, P. (1974) Bi ology and Control of Insect Pests of Soybeans and Peanuts: Report No. 4 3781. (Unpublished study includ ing submitter summary, received Jul 1, 1975 under 3125-163; prepared by Auburn Univ., submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, Mo.; CDL:115279-D)

29943 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D. ; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb (A), Aldicarb Sulfoxide (ASO), Aldicarb Sulfone (ASO2) and a 1:1 Mi xture of ASO:ASO2 Two Year Feeding in the Diet of Rats: Special Report 35-82. (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1980 under 1016-69; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:241658-A)

### Page 87 of 191 29986 Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-C)

29987 Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik Aldicarb Granular Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-D)

29988 Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Assay and Analysis for Impurities. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016 -78; CDL:097162-E)

29989 Smith, F.F.; Maitlen, J.C.; McDonough, L.M.; etal. (1978) Report of Residue Analysis: PCY68-11. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; prepared in cooperation with U.S. Agricultural Research Service, En tomology Research Div., Pesticide Chemicals Research Branch and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:097162-G)

29990 Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Description of Analytical Methods. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-H)

29991 Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Tomatoes by Gas Chromatography. Method dated Aug 1977. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 101678; CDL:097162-I)

29993 Union Carbide Corporation (1978) Practical Method for Removing Toxic Aldicarb Pesticide Residues from Tomatoes. (Unpublished stud y received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-J)

29994 Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-K)

29995 Lyons, R.; Lindquist, ; Sorensen, ; et al. (1977) Residues from Aldicarb on Tomatoes. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 10 16-78; prepared by Michigan State Univ. and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:097162-L)

29996 Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Confirmato ry Procedure for the Identification of Aldicarb Residues Utilizing a Non-polar GLC Column. Method dated Feb 1977. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-M)

30423 Field, W.E.; Mellott, M.J. (1979) Oral LDI50^ in Rabbits: Study No. CDC-UC-007-79. (Unpublished study received Feb 28, 1980 unde r 264-330; prepared by CDC Research, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:242164-A)

30424 Field, W.E.; Mellott, M.J. (1979) Acute Dermal Toxicity in Rats: Study No. CDC-UC-008- 79. (Unpublished study received Feb 28, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by CDC Research, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 242164-B)

30425 Field, W.E.; Mellott, M.J. (1979) Acute Dermal Toxicity in Rabbits: Study No. CDC-UC009-79. (Unpublished st udy received Feb 28, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by CDC Research, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa; CDL: 242164-C)

31311 Nigh, E.L., Jr.; Thomason, I.J.; Caveness, F.E.; et al. (1968) Quick Summary Reference of Performance of Temik 10G on Insects, Mites, Nematodes Attacking Cotton (Includes Data 1964 thru 1967). (Unp ublished study received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F 0798; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of Arizona, Dept. of Plant Pathology and others, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:091942-A)

### Page 88 of 191 31547 Allen, W.W.; Johnson, R.; Morishita, F.S.; et al. (1979) Efficacy and Phytotoxicity. (Unpublished study received Jan 11, 1980 under IL 80/1; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California, Div. of Entomology, submitted by Illinois, Dept. of Agriculture, Plant & Apiary Protection for Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, N.J.; CDL:241606-A)

31565 Wilson, W.L.; Todd, F.A.; Leake, P.H. (1976) Sensory Evaluation of Cigarettes Made from

Tobacco Treated with Standak 75% Wettable Powder Sulfocarb Pe sticide (1974-1976). (Unpublished study received Feb 28, 1978 unde r 1016-79; prepared in cooperation with Imperial Tobacco, Ltd. and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:232983-B)

31763 Blackmon, C.W.; Farrar, L.L. ; Smith, F.H.; et al. (1973) Addition to Synopsis of Biological Performance and Phytotoxicity on Cotton and Soybeans. (Unpublished study received Jan 3, 1974 under 3125-213; prepared in cooperation with Clemson Univ.; Edisto Experiment Station and others, submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, Mo.; CDL:094066-A)

32245 Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097162-B)

32246 Sleesman, J.P.; Hofmaster, R.N.; Waterfield, R. L.; et al. (1978) Discus sion of Performance of Temik: Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished st udy received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; prepared in cooperation with Ohio State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:097163-A)

32505 Allen, W.W.; Mori shita, F.S.; Koranski, D.S.; et al. (1979) Efficacy and Phytotoxicity. (Unpublished study received Apr 24 , 1980 under DE 80/5; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California--Berkeley, Div. of Entomology and others, submitted by Delaware, Dept. of Agriculture, Div. of Production and Promotion for Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, N.J.; CDL:242353-A)

35363 Union Carbide Corporation (1971) Ingestion of Aldicarb by Human Volunteers: A Controlled Study of the Effects of Aldicarb on Ma n. Includes undated methods entitled: Blood cholinesterase determination by a radiometric method; Aldicarb: The determination of residues in human urine. (Unpublished study including letter dated Feb 5, 1971 from C.U. Dernehl to R.C. Back, received Jul 26 , 1971 under 1F1008 ; CDL:091747-A)

35364 Union Carbide Corporation (1970) Respon se to Comments on Pesticide Petition 0F1008: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; CDL:091747-B)

35365 Bull, D.L.; Stokes, R.A.; Copp edge, J.R.; et al. (1970) Further studies of the fate of Aldicarb in soil. Journal of Economic Entomology 63(4):1283-1289. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-C)

35366 Coppedge, J.R.; Ridgway, R.L.; Bull, D.L. (1968) A Preliminary Report on the Movement and Persistence of Aldicarb in Soil. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., unpublished study; CDL:091747-D)

35367 Thomason, I.J. (1970) Effi cacy Study Using Sugar Beets. (U npublished study including letter dated Dec 29, 1970 from I.J. Thomason to R obert G. Haines, received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California--Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Nematology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-E)

### Page 89 of 191 35368 Lange, W.H.; Phillips, I.L. (1971) Residu e Study Using Sugar Beets. (Unpublished study including letter dated Dec 9, 1970 from W.H. Lange to Robert Haines, received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared in cooperation with Univ. of California--Davis, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-F)

35369 Yun, Y.M.; Ellis, K.C. (197 0) Residue Study Usin g Sugar Beets. (Unpub lished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared in cooperation with Great Western Sugar Co., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-H)

35370 Union Carbide Corporation (1970) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chem ical: Temik. (Unpublished stud y received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; CDL:091747-J)

35371 Weil, C.S.; Condra, N.I.; White, C. (1969) Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone Single Rabbit Skin Penetration Studies: Special Report 32-7 8. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-K)

35372 Carpenter, C.P.; Adams, J.T. (1969) Misce llaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report 32-84. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Carn egie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 091747-L)

35373 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R. (1970) Temik: Result of Feeding in the Diets of Rats for 7 Days: Special Report 33-5. (Unp ublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-M)

35374 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) 1:1 Temik: Temik Sulfone--Results of Feeding in the Diets of Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 33-6. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-N)

35375 Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.A.; Baughman, J.A. (1970) Temik and Other Materials--Miscellaneous Single Dose Peroral and Parent eral LDI50^ Assays and Some Joint Action Studies: Special Report 33-7. (Unpublished study received Jul 26 , 1971 under 1F1008; pr epared by CarnegieMellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-O)

35376 Weil, C.S. (1970) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report 33-18. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 und er 1F1008; prepar ed by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-P)

35377 Woodside, M.D.; Chin, B.H.; Tallant, M.J. (1969) Temik 10GV 2Methyl-2- (methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methyl carbamoyl)oxime: Peroral Dosing of a Hereford Heifer with Notes on Cholinesterase Inhibition: Special Report 32-82. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F 1008; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington , D.C.; CDL:091747-Q)

35378 Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.A.; Baughman, J.L. (1 970) Comparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of Temik 10GV and 15 Other Pesticide Formulations as Marketed: Special Report 33-15. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; prepared by Carn egie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-R)

### Page 90 of 191 35379 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R. (1969) 2-Methyl-2(methylsulfinyl)propanol-1: Results of Feeding in the Diets of Rats for One Week: Special Report 32-73. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1 971 under 1F1008; prepar ed by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 091747-S)

35380 Schlinke, J.C. (1969) Toxicologic effects of five soil nematocides in cattle and sheep. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 155(8):1364-1366. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jul 26, 1971 under 1F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:091747-T)

36307 Union Carbide Corporation (1975) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-B) 36308 Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide: UCC No. 1-21V5-1.8a.

Includes methods UCC no. 1B-21V5-1.1d date d Apr 21, 1975. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-C)

36309 Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide Assay and Analysis for Impurities. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G16 89; CDL:096440-D)

36310 Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Nature of the Resi dues. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-E)

36311 McDonough, L.M.; Maitlen, J.C. (1967) Repo rt of Residue Analysis: Report No. PCY-67-5. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., Pesticide Chemicals Research Branch, unpublished study; CDL:096440-F)

36312 Iley, J.R.; Baines, ; Gunther, ; et al. (19) Magnitude of the Residue. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; prepared in cooperation with Applied Ag. Research, Inc. and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:096440-G)

36313 Gunther, F.A.; Carman, G.E. ; Baines, R.C.; et al. (1975) Al dicarb (Temik^(R)I) Residues in Oranges, Orange Leaves, and Soil after Soil Ap plication in an Orange Grove. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; prepar ed in cooperation with Univ. of California- -Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology and others, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 096440-H)

36314 Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Description of Analytical Methods: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-I)

36315 Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Citrus

Fruit. Method Aldicar b-FPD-General dated Ju l 1975. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-J)

36316 Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:096440-K)

41448 Union Carbide Corporation (1973) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished st udy received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-A) 41449 Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Nature and Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jun 30, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097162-F)

### Page 91 of 191 42482 Godek, E.G.; Matthews, R.J.; Naismith, R.W.; et al. (1980) Ames Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test: (Aldicarb): PH 301 -UC-004-80. (Unpublished study received Sep 2, 1980 under 264-330; prepared by Pharmakon Laboratories, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243142-A)

44731 Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Chronic Toxicity Studies (Carinogenic and Oncogenic Effects). Summary of studies 096503-B through 096503-D and 096503-G. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 un der 6E1792; CDL:096503-A)

44732 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldi carb: 18 Month Feeding in Diet of Mice: Special Report 35-70 . (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792, prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-B)

44733 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1974) Aldi carb: 18-Month Feeding in the Diet of Mice, Study II: Special Report 37- 98. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 096503-C)

44734 Weil, C.S. (1976) Reanalysis of Tumor Incidence Data of Aldicarb 18-Month Mouse Feeding Studies: Special Report 39-55. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Carnegie -Mellon Institute of Research, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-D)

44735 Union Carbide Corporation (1975) Studies Using Aldicarb. Summary of studies 096503-F. Summary of studies 096503-F through 096503-I. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; CDL:096503-E)

44736 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1974) Aldi carb: Inclusion in the Diet of Rats for Three Generations and a Dominant Lethal Mutagenesis Test: Special Report 37-90. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 un der 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research , submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-F)

44737 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1974) Aldi carb: Inclusion in the Diets of Dogs for Three Months: Special Report 37-12 . (Unpublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlin gton, Va.; CDL:096503-G)

44739 Moorefield, H.H.; Myers, R.C.; Weil, C. S. (1975) Temik 10G BC (Coal); 10G and 15G (Gypsum); 15G (Corn Cob): Comparative Toxicity Studies via Peroral, Dermal, and Inhalation Routes: Special Report 38-141. (U npublished study received May 19, 1976 under 6E1792; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ ., Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096503-I)

44740 Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik. (Unpublished study received May 19, 1 976 under 6E1792; CDL:096503-J) 51212 Bussian, R.A. (1980) Letter sent to H.H. M oorefield dated Oct 3, 1980: Temik TSX sample analysis. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-E)

51314 Back, R.C. (1980) Letter sent to Charles T. Mitchell dated Mar 5, 1980 Temik 10% granular Aldicarb pesticide: Report on Welton Parker death. (Unpublished study received Mar 14, 1980 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243366-A)

### Page 92 of 191 51315 Back, R.C. (1980) Letter sent to Charles T. Mitchell dated Mar 5, 1980: Report on Paul Keller Case. (Unpublished study received Mar 14, 1980 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Am bler, Pa.; CDL:243367-A)

53127 Union Carbide Corporation (1980) Aldicarb Residue Analytical Data: Suffolk County EUP. (Reports by various sources; unpublished st udy received Oct 3, 1980 under 264-EX-58; CDL:243417-A)

53341 Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al . (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik (2-Methyl-2- methylthiopropionaldehyde-N-methylcarbamoyloxime) and Related Carbamates: Special Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-D)

53342 Striegal, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C. (1963) Special Report: Comparison of the Acute Toxicity of Compound 21149 with Several of Its Analogues: Report 26-29. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 un der 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-E)

53343 Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.A.; Baughman, J.A. (1970) Temik and Other Materials: Miscellaneous Single Dose Peroral and Parent eral LDI50 Assays and Some Joint Action Studies: Special Report 33-7. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX -37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-F)

53345 Johnson, H.E.; Sullivan, L.J.; McGee, M.A. (1968) Studies on an Effective Therapy for Overdoses of Temik, Temik sulfoxide, and Temik sulfone in the Rat: Special Report 31-139. (Unpublished study recei ved Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-H)

53346 Chin, B.H.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) Toxicity of Carbamate to Rats. Pages 1-14,InPesticide Subdivision Agriculture & Food Chemistry Division, 156th ACS National Meeting; Sep 9-13, 1968, Atlantic City, New Jersey. N.P. (Pap er #121; AlsoInunpublis hed submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-I) 53348 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) Temik (T), Temik Sulfoxide (TSO), Temik Sulfone (TSOI2), 1:1 TSO:TSOI2: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for 7 Days: Special Report 33-81. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-K)

53350 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D. ; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb (A), Aldicarb Sulfoxide (ASO), Aldicarb Sulfone (ASOI2) and a 1:1 Mixture of ASO:ASOI2: Two Year Feeding in the Diet of Rats: Special Repo rt 35-82. (Unpublished study r eceived Jan 18, 1977 under 1016- EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228976-M)

53353 Clarkson, V.A.; Hensley, W.H. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Toxicity of Temik, Temik sulfoxide and Temik sulfone to Bluegill Sunfish: Project No. 111B32. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 u nder 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228975-C)

53355 Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Metabolis m and Toxicity of Metabolites. Summary of studies 228975-J through 228975-N and 228976-D. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016EX-37; CDL:228975-H)

### Page 93 of 191 53356 Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al . (1968) Toxicity Studies on the Probable NonCarbamate Plant Metabolites of Temik (2-Methyl-2-methylthiopropionaldehyde-Nmethylcarbamoyloxime): Specia l Report 31-30. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlin gton, Va.; CDL:228975-J)

53358 Bartley, W.J.; Andrawes, N.R.; Chancey, E.L.; et al. (197 0) Metabolism of Temik Aldicarb pesticide (2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime) in the cotton plant. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemicals 18(3):446-453. (Also In unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228975-L)

53362 Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Nature of the Residue: Metabolism in Animals. Summary

of studies 229879-K th rough 228979-O. (Unpublished study receive d Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; CDL: 228979-B)

53363 Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Nature of the Residue: Environmental Fate of Sulfocarb. Summary of studies 228979-J and 228979-P through 228979-AA. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; CD L:228979-C)

53364 Bull, D.L. (1968) Metabolism of UC-21149 (2-Methyl-2-(methythio)propionaldehyde o - (methylcarbamoyl)oxime) in cotton plants and soil in the field. Journal of Economic Entomology 61(6):1598 1602. (Also In unpublished submissi on received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-Ex-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-D)

53366 Coppedge, J.R.; Lindquist, D.A.; Bull, D.L.; et al. (1967) Fate of 2-Methyl-2- (methylthio)propionaldehyde o (Methylcarbamoyl) oxime (Temik) in cotton plants and soil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 15(5):902-910. (Also in unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 u nder 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-F)

53368 Metcalf, R.L.; Fukuto, T.R., Collins, C.; et al. (1966) Metabolism of 2-Methyl-2- (methylthio)-propionaldehyde o -(Methylcarbamoyl)oxime in plant and insect. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 14(6):579-58 4. (Also in unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-H)

53369 Ridgway, R.L.; Jones, S.L.; Coppedge, J.R. ; et al. (1968) Systemic activity of 2-Methyl-2- (methylthio)propionaldehydeo(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (UC-21149) in the cotton plant with special reference to the boll weevil. Journal of Economic Entomology 61 (6):1705-1712. (AlsoInunpublished s ubmission received Jan 18, 1977 under 10 15-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-I)

53370 Hirsh, D.H.; Sheets, K.P.; Holsing, G.C. (1976) Sulfocarb: Fate in Aerobic and Anaerobic Soils. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-J)

53371 Dorough, H.W.; Ivie, G.W. (1968) Temik- S metabolism in a lactating cow. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 16(3):460-46 4. (Also in unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-K)

### Page 94 of 191 53372 Dorough, H.W.; Davis, R.B.; Ivie, G.W. (197 0) Fate of Temik-Carbon14 in lactating cows during a 14-day feeding period. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 18(1):135-142. (Also in unpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-E X-37: submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-L)

53373 Hicks, B.W.; Dorough, H.W.; Mehendale, H. M. (1972) Metabolism of Aldicarb pesticide in laying hens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 20(1):151-156. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-M)

53374 Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; Ko zbelt, S.J.; et al. (1968) The Excretion of C^14I Equivalents of 2-Methyl-2-(methylsulfonyl)propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl)oxime by the Rat after a Single Peroral Dose: Special Report 31-130. (U npublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-N)

53375 Sullivan, L.J.; Eldridge, J.M.; Tallant, M.J. ; et al. (1968) Urinary Metabolic Profiles as Determined by Silica Gel Chromatography of Urines from Rats and Dogs Dosed with Temik sulfone: Special Report 31-138 a. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-O)

53377 Andrawes, N.R.; Holsing, G.C. (1976) Hydr olysis of UC-21865 Sulfocarb Pesticide in Aqueous Buffer Solutions: Project No. 111A14 . (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-Q)

53378 Borash, A.J.; Kramer, J.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1973) Experiments Designed To Trace Movements of Aldicarb in Soil: Project No. 111B13. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-R)

53379 Bromilow, R.H. ( 1973) Breakdown and fate of Oximecar bamate nematicides in crops and soils. Annals of Applied Biology 75(3):4734 79. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-S)

53380 Richey, F.A., Jr.; Bartley, W.J. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Water Leaching of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, Aldicarb Sulfone and Internal Standard Chloride Ion in Columns of Four Soil Types: Project No. 111A12 . (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-U)

53381 Richey, F.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1972) Temik--Aldicarb Pesticide: Upward Movement of Aldicarb through soil during Water Evaporation: Project No. 111A12. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 u nder 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-V)

53382 Romine, R.R.; Meek er, R.L. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pes ticide: Leaching of Aldicarb into Sandy Soil with Irrigation of a Temik Treated Sugar Beet Field: Project No. 111A13. (Unpublished study received Ja n 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-W)

53383 Romine, R.R.; Meeker, R.L. (1973) Accumulation of Aldicarb Residues in Fish Tissue from Chronic Exposure to Aldicarb, Aldicarb sulfoxide and Aldicarb sulfone in Aquaria Water: Project No. 111A13. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlin gton, Va.; CDL:228979-X)

### Page 95 of 191 53384 Copeland, G.L.; Fink, R. (1973) Final Report: Acute and Chronic Exposure of Bluegill

Sunfish to Aldicarb Carbamate Residues: Project No . 400-612. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Environmental Sciences Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-Y)

53385 Romine, R.R.; Halstead, C. B.; Gibson, C.E.; et al. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Leaching

Characteristics of Temik 10G in Soils: Project No. 111A13. (U npublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228979-Z)

53386 Spurr, H.W., Jr.; Sousa, A.A. (1974) Potent ial interactions of Aldicarb and its metabolites on nontarget organisms in the environment. Journal of Environmental Quality 3(2):130-133. (Also Inunpublished submission received jan 18 , 1977 under 1016-EX3 7; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228979-AA)

54410 Weil, C.S. (1977) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Temik: Special Report 33-18. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 unde r 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231509-S)

54413 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) 1:1 Temik: Temik Sulfone: Results of Feeding in the Diets of Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 33-6. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231509-V)

54442 Weil, C.S.; Condra, N.I.; Ge ary, D.L.; Jr.; et al. (1974) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide 10G and 15G: Range Finding Toxi city Studies: Special Report 37 -39. (Unpublished study received Aug 31, 1977 under 1016-69; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submi tted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231462-A)

55533 Myers, R.C.; Carpen ter, C.P.; Calisti, L.J.; et al. (1977) Temik/ Terrazole/Terraclor Mixture (2:1:4) Range Finding Toxicity Studies: Proj ect Report 40-126. (U npublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by Carn egie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 243546-D)

55534 Wolfe, G.W; Bristol, K.L. (1980) Fina l Report: Primary Eye Irritation Study in Rabbits: Project No. 400-634. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-F)

### Page 96 of 191 55535 Wolfe, G.W.; Wentz, K.L. (1980) Final Re port: Primary Dermal Irritation Study in Rabbits: Project No. 400-633. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-G)

55536 Wolfe, G.W.; Bristol, K.L. (1980) Final Re port: Acute Oral Toxicity Study in Rats: Project No. 400-631. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 26 4-319; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultu ral Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:243546-H)

55537 Dauvin, E.M.; Wolfe, G.W.; Voelker, R.W. ; et al. (1980) Final Report: Acute Dermal Toxicity Study in Rabbits: Pr oject No. 400632. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 under 264-319; prepared by Hazleton Labora tories America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 243546-I)

57332 Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al . (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik (2-Methyl-2- methylthiopropionaldehyde-M-methylcarbamoyloxime) and Related Carbamates: Special Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-D)

57333 Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C. (1 963) Special Report: Comparison of the Acute Toxicity of Compound 21149 with Several of Its Analogues: Report 26-29. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-E)

57335 Johnson, H.E.; Sullivan, L.J.; McGee, M.A. (1968) Studies on an Effective Therapy for Overdoses of Temik, Temik sulfoxide, and Temik sulfone in the Rat: Special Report 31-139. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 unde r 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228152-H)

57336 Chin, B.H.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) Toxi city of Temik on the Rat, Dog and Rabbit. (Unpublished study received Ja n 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-I)

57337 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1968) Temik sulfone: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for Six Months and Dogs for Three Months: Special Report 31-142. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 unde r 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 228152-J)

57338 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1970) Temik (T), Temik sulfoxide (TSO), Temik sulfone (TSOI2), 1:1 TSO:TSOI2: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for 7 Days: Special Report 33-81. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-K)

57339 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Be rnard, J.R. (1974) UC 21865: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 37-89. (U npublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-L)

### Page 97 of 191 57340 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D. ; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1972) Aldicarb (A), Aldicarb sulfoxide (ASO), Aldicarb sulfone (ASOI2) and a 1:1 Mixture of ASO:ASOI2: Two Year Feeding in the Diet of Rats: Special Repo rt 35-82. (Unpublished study r eceived Jan 18, 1977 under 1016- EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-M)

57341 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Peterson, L.G. ; et al. (1975) Aldicar b sulfoxide and Aldicarb sulfone Cholinesterase Inhibition Results after Periods of One to Fifty-Six Days of Inclusion in the Diets of Rats: Special Report 38-115. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:228152-N)

58625 Carpenter, C.P.; West, J.S.; McGee, M.A.; et al. (1966) Single Dose Toxicity Studies on Tranid: Report 29-41. (Unpublished study received Jun 13, 1966 under 1016-EX-19; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 126464-A)

58631 Weil, C.S.; Bernard, J.; Woodside, M.D.; et al. (1966) Insecticide Temik: Teratogenic Potential in Rats: Report 29-8 1. (Unpublished study received Oc t 8, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126491-A)

58632 Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.I.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G (10.5% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149) 15-Day Dermal Applications to Rabbits: Report 29-80. (Unpublished study recei ved Oct 8, 1966 under 1016-EX-24 ; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 126491-B)

58633 Stansbury, H.A., Jr. (1967) Letter sent to Frank J. McFarland dated Jul 10, 1967 Information on feeding of Temik-treated potatoes to livestock. Summary of study 126491-D. (Unpublished study received Ju l 13, 1967 under 101 6-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126491-C)

58634 Dorough, H.W.; Ivie, G.W. (1967) Metabolism and Elimination of Temik-S^35I by a Lactating Cow. (Unpublished study received Ju l 13, 1967 under 1016 -EX-24; prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126491-D)

58635 Stansbury, H.A., Jr. (1967) Letter sent to Frank J. McFarland dated Jun 28, 1967 Decomposition of Temik in pota toes. (Unpublished study receive d Jul 3, 1967 under 1016- EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126491-E)

58636 Union Carbide Corporation (19) Formula for Temik 10G Granular Pesticide. (Unpublished study received on unknown date un der 1016-EX-24; CDL:126491-F)

59356 Moorefield, H.H. (1979) Annotated Bibliography of N-Nitrosoaldicarb (Chronological Sequence). Summary of stud ies 241324-B through 241324-H . (Unpublished study received Nov 14, 1979 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 241324-A)

59357 Hirsh, D.H.; Sheets, K.P.; Holsing, G.C. (1978) Temik aldicarb Pesticide Stability of NNitrosoaldicarb: Project No. 810C21. Method dated Apr 28, 1978. (Unpublished study received Nov 14, 1979 under 1016-69; submitte d by Union Carbide Co rp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:241324-F)

60193 Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik. Summary of studies 093778-B through 093778-E. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 197 3 under 3F1414; CDL: 093778-A)

### Page 98 of 191 60194 Weil, C.S. (1972) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report 35-41. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F 1414; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:093778-B)

60195 Weil, C.S.; DeMary, L.J.; Soo, V. (1971) Co mparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of Temik 10GV, Temik 15GV and 5 Other Pesticide Formulations as Marketed: Special Report 34-76. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; prepared by CarnegieMellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL: 093778-C) 60196 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D. ; Bernard, J.R.; et al. (1973) Aldicarb (A), Aldicarb sulfoxide (ASO), Aldicarb sulfone (ASOI2) and a 1:1 Mixture of ASO:ASOI2: Two Year Feeding in the Diet of Rats: Special Re port 35-82. (Unpublished stu dy received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:093778-D)

60197 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Chin, B.H. ; et al. (1973) Aldicar b: 2-Methylthio-2- methylpropionaldehyde N-methylcarbamoyloxime: Seven-Day Inclusion in Diet of Dogs: Special Report 36-33. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:093778-E)

60554 West, J.S.; McGee, M. (1965) Special Report: The Single Dose Peroral Toxicity of Compounds 20299, 21149, 19786 and 20047A for White Leghorn Cockerels: Special Report 28-30. (Unpublished study received Jun 1, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:128692-F)

60555 Borash, A.J. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide Agricultural Products. (Unpublished study received Jun 1, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; s ubmitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:128692-G)

60556 Cope, O.B. (1964) Letter sent to Robert G. Harris dated Oct 30, 1964 Toxicity of variouspesticides to rainbow trout and bluegill sunfish. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FishPesticide Research Laboratory; unpublished study; CDL:128692-H)

61078 Mulla, M.S. (1964) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Oct 20, 1964 Information on toxicity of some compounds against mosquito fish. (Unp ublished study received Oct 20, 1964 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Univ. of California--Riverside, Div. of Agricultural Sciences, Citrus Research Center and Agricultu ral Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131936-A)

61079 Union Carbide Corporation (1969) Toxicity of the Formulated Product Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131936-C) 61080 Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Effect on Wildlife. Summary of studies 131936-A,

131936-B and 131936-H. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131936-E) 61081 Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Metabolis m and Toxicity of Metabolites. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admi n. no.; CDL:131936-F)

61082 Union Carbide Corporation (1968) Acute Toxicity Stud ies. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131936-G)

### Page 99 of 191 61087 Carpenter, C.P.; Go ldberg, M.E.; Johnson, H.E.; et al. (1966) Special Report: Recapitulation of Acute Toxicity and Pharmacodynamic Studies on Dessin (Compound 19786): Report 29- 47. (Unpublished study received Sep 1, 196 6 under 1016-EX-18; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126458-D)

61089 Borash, A.J.; Bryant, H.M., Jr. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide Agricultural Products. (Unpublished study received Ju n 10, 1965 under 1016-EX-18; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126458-K)

62512 Union Carbid e Corporation (19) Human Exposure Ex perience. (Unpublished study received Oct 20, 1964 under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131936-D)

63184 Union Carbide Corporation (1968) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide Chemicals. (Unpublishe d study received Jun 14, 1978 under 1016-81; CDL:234234- A)

63185 Union Carbide Corporation (19) Manufacturing Proce ss. (Unpublished study received Jun 14, 1978 under 1016-81; CDL:234234-B)

63186 Union Carbide Corporation (19) Specification: Temik TSX Granular Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Jun 14, 1978 unde r 1016-81; CDL:234234-C)

63187 Union Carbide Corporation (19) Specificat ion Methods: Temik TSX Granular Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Jun 14, 1978 under 1016-81; CDL:234234-D)

64115 Natoff, I.L. (1976) The effects of antidotes in experimental animals intoxicated by carbomate and organophosphorus cholinesterase inhibitors. Pages 53-64,InMed. Prot. Chem.-Warf. Agents, Pap. Symp.. By Stockholm, Sweden: Almquist & Wiksell. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jul 20, 1980 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 234481-A)

64811 Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Application for Registration of Standak 75WP Sulfocarb Pesticid e for Use on Tobacco and Cotton. (Reports by various sources; unpublished study received Au g 4, 1977 under 1016 -79; CDL:231504-G)

65956 Johnson, H.E.; McGee, M.A.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) Studies on an Effective Therapy for Overdoses of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide, and Temik Sulfone in the Rat: Special Report 31-139. (Unpublished study recei ved Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:229032-H)

66341 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory (1981) Acephate, Aldicarb, Carbophenothion, DEF, EPN, Ethoprop, Methyl Parathion, and Phorate: Their Acute and Chronic Toxicity, Bioconcentration Potential, and Persistence as Related to Marine Environments: EPA-600/4-81-023. (Unpublished study)

66588 Chin, B.H.; Sullivan, L.J. (1968) (Some Biomedical Considerations of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone). (Unpublished paper #121 presented at the 156th ACS National Meeting, Agr. & Food Chemistry Div., Pesticide Subdivision; Sept 9-13, 1968, Atlantic City, N.J.; unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:229032-I)

66769 Peoples, S.A.; Maddy, K.T.; Smith, C.R. (197 7) Occupational Exposure to Temik (Aldicarb) As Reported by Physicians in California for the Years 1974 through 1976. (California, Dept. of Food and Agriculture, Worker Health and Safety Unit; unpublished study; CDL:232634-A)

### Page 100 of 191 66770 Natoff, I.L.; Reiff, B. (1973) Effect of ox imes on the acute toxicity of anticholinesterase carbamates. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 25:569-575. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 23, 1977 under unknown admin. no.; submitted by California, Dept. of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, Calif.; CDL:232634-B)

67477 Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Efficacy of Variou s Chemicals on Potatoes and Various Crops. (Compilation; unpublished study, incl uding published data, received Nov 13, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093780-A)

68243 Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Nature of the Residue. Summary of studies 231503-B through 2315 03-Z. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; CDL:231503- A)

68248 Borash, A.J.; Kramer, J.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1973) Experiments Designed to Trace Movements of Aldicarb in Soil: UCC Project Re port No. 17959. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231503-P)

68249 Coppedge, J.R.; Ridgway, R.L.; Bull, D.L. (1968) A Preliminary Report on the Movement and Persistence of Aldicarb in Soil. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., unpublished study; CDL:231503-R)

68250 Richey, F.A., Jr.; Bartley, W.J. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Water Leaching of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, Aldicarb Sulfone and Internal Standard Chloride Ion in Columns of Four Soil Types: UCC Project Report No. 16669. (Unpublished stud y received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231503-S)

68251 Richey, F.A., Jr.; Moorefield, H.H. (1972) Temik-Aldicarb Pesticide: Upward Movement of Aldicarb through Soil during Water Evaporation: UCC Project Report No. 17526. (Unpublished study recei ved Aug 4, 1977 un der 1016-79; submitted by Union Carb ide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231503-T)

68252 Romine, R.R.; Meek er, R.L. (1972) Temik Aldicarb Pes ticide: Leaching of Aldicarb into Sandy Soil with Irrigation of a Temik Treated Sugar Beet Field: UCC Project Report No. 17079. (Unpublished study received Aug 4, 1977 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231503-U)

69644 Union Carbide Corporation (1981) Reassessment of the Acceptable Daily Intake Values for Temik^(R)I (Aldicarb) and Me tabolites in the Human. (Unp ublished study received on unknown date under 264-330; CDL:244421-A)

69736 Dernehl, C.U. (1974) Letter sent to Richard C. Back dated Jan 21, 1974 Human consumption of potatoes containing 1 ppm of aldicarb. (Unpublished stud y received on unknown date under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:098300-A)

69738 Quick, Q.; Lovell, C.M. (1966) Temik Sulfoxide and Sulfone Stability: File No. 6135. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; submitte d by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:098300-C)

69739 Union Carbide Corporation (1973) A Method for the Determination of Total Toxic AldicarbResidues in Potato Tubers by Gas Chromatography. Method designation ALDICARB-FPDPOT dated Feb 1973. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300-D)

### Page 101 of 191 69740 Union Carbide Corporation (1973) A Method for the Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Peanuts by Gas Chromatography. Method designation ALDICARB-FPD-PNUT dated Feb 1973. (Unpublished stud y received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300- E)

69741 Union Carbide Corporation (1973) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished st udy received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL:098300-F) 69742 Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study

received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300-G)

69743 Union Carbide Corporation (1972) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide Assay and Analysis for Impurities: File No. 300-21V5. (Unpublished st udy received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 098300-H)

69744 Union Carbide Corporation (1973) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: (Temik 10G). (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL:098300-J)

69745 Weil, C.S., ed. (1972) Miscellaneous Toxi city Studies: Special Report 35-41. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; prepared by Ca rnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:098300-K)

69914 Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Introduction: Temik. Summary of studies 131905-B,

131905-F and 131905-G. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131905-A)

69915 Smyth, H.F., Jr. (1965) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jun 4, 1965 Toxicity information on compound 21149. Summary of studies 131905-C through 131905-G. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 u nder unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon In stitute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-B)

69916 Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C.; et al. (1962) Range Finding Tests on Compound 21149: Report 25-53. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon Institute of Industrial Research, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-C)

69917 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1963) Results of Three Months of Inclusion of Compound 21149 in the Diet of Rats: Report 26-47. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 131905-D)

69918 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D. ; Bernard, J.; et al. (1964) Results of a Three Generation Reproduction Study on Rats Fed Compound UC21149 in Their Diet: Report 27-158. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-E)

69919 Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.; McGee, M.A. (1965) A 4-hour Test for Evaluation of Comparative Skin Pene tration Hazard: Report 28-34. (U npublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-F)

### Page 102 of 191 69920 Pozzani, U.C.; Kinkead, E.R. (1965) The Me chanical Attrition of Some Granular Pesticide Formulations: Report 28-35. (U npublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-G)

69921 Heywood, D.L. (1965) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jul 28, 1965 Data on metabolism of UC 21149 in animals and opinion on metabolic fate of UC 21149 in plants and animals. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131905-H)

69922 Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C. (1963) Comparison of the Acute Toxicity of Compound 21149 with Several of Its Analogues: Report 26-29. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 131905-I)

70515 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1980) Pesticide Residues in Food-- 1979: Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Expert Group on Pesticide Residues Held in Geneva, 3-12 December 1979. By FAO and World Health Orga nization. Rome, Italy: FAO. (Pages iiiiv,vi,17-20 only; FAO plant production and protection paper 20; available from: Distribution and Sales Section, FAO, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00100, Italy; published study; CDL:244431-A)

70984 Sontag, J.M. (1978) Minutes: Thirteenth Meeting of the Data Evaluation/Risk Assessment Subgroup of the Clearinghouse on Environmental Carcinogens. (U.S. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Div. of Ca ncer Cause and Prevention; unpublished study; CDL:237727-D)

73205 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1980) Acute Toxicity of Temik TSX Granular Formulation. Summary of studies 243546-B through 243546-I. (Unpublished study received Oct 23, 1980 u nder 264-319; CDL:243546-A)

73207 Ercegovich, C.D.; Rashid, K.A. (1977) Muta genesis Induced in Mutant Strains ofSalmonella typhimuriumby Pesticides. (Unpublished study, including letter dated Sep 22, 1977 from C.D. Ercegovich to Tom Evrard, received Aug 24, 1979 under 1258-812; prepared by Pennsylvania State Univ., Pesticide Research Laboratory , submitted by Olin Co rp., Stamford, Conn.; CDL:240890-C)

73306 Quarles, J.M.; Schenley, C.K.; Tennant, R.W. (1975) Use of a transplacental host-mediated culture system for assay of transformation by Nitroso compounds. IRCS Medical Science (Supplement) 3(10):22. (AlsoInu npublished submission receive d Nov 14, 1979 under 1016- 69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:241324-B)

73307 Lijinsky, W.; Elespuru, R.K. (1975) Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity of N-Nitroso Derivatives of Carbamate Insecticides. (Unpublished study, including published data, received Nov 14, 1979 under 1016-69; prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Univ. of Tennessee, Oak Ridge Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 241324-C)

73308 Blevins, R.D.; Lijinsky, W., Regan, J.D. (1977) Nitrosated Methylcarbamate insecticides:

Effect on the DNA of human cells. Muta tion Research 44:1-7. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Nov 14, 1979 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:241324-D)

### Page 103 of 19173309 Lijinsky, W.; Schmahl, D. (1978) Carcinogenicity of N-Nitroso derivatives of NMethylcarbamate insecticides in rats. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2:413-419. (AlsoInunpublished submission r eceived Nov 14, 1979 under 1 016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:241324-H)

73345 Kimmerle, (1971) Letter sent to PF-ATEA Product Development dated Jan 25, 1971: Disyston and Temik granular: Report No. 293 78. (Unpublished study received Dec 15, 1976 under 3125-58; prepared by Bayer, W. Germany, submitted by Mobay Chemical Corp., Kansas City, Mo.; CDL:095640-E)

75794 West, J.S.; McGee, M. (1965) The Single Dose Peroral Toxicity of Compounds 20299, 21149, 19786 and 20047A for White Leghorn Cockerels: Report 28-30. (Unpublished study received Aug 8, 1966 under 7G05 29; prepared by Me llon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Sout h Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090633-G)

75801 Carpenter, C.P.; Goldberg, M.E.; Johnson, H.E.; et al. (1966) Recapitulation of Acute Toxicity and Pharmacodynamic Studies on Dessin (Compound 19786): Report 29-47. Summary of studies 090633-C through 090633-I. (Unpublished study received Aug 8, 1966 under 7G0529; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., South Charlest on, W.Va.; CDL:090633-S)

76065 Knott, W.; Beliles, R.P. (1966) UC-21149: Acute Toxicity in Sunfish. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016- 69; prepared by Woodard Re search Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231174-A)

76066 Woodard Research Corporation (1965) UC-21149: Safety Evaluation on Fish and Wildlife: (Bobwhite Quail and Rainbow Trout). (Unpublis hed study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016- 69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231174-B)

76067 Beliles, R.P.; Knott, W.; Wright, L. (1966 ) UC-21149 10%: Summary of Safety Evaluation on Fish and Wildlife. Summary of studies 231174-A and 231174-B. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016- 69; prepared by Woodard Re search Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:231174-D)

76100 Dernehl, C.U. (1966) Letter sent to J.S. Le ary, Jr. dated Jul 12, 1966 Acute poisoning report by UC 21149. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under unk nown admin. no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:102773-A)

79137 Enfield, C.G.; Carsel, R.F.; Cohen, S.Z.; et al. (1980) Methods of Approximating Transport of Organic Pollutants to Groundwater. (Unpublished study received Jun 24, 1981 under 100-607; prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Hazard Evaluation Div. and Computer Science Corp., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:245315-B)

79162 Wacker Chemie GmbH (1979) Toxicology Data for Butocarboxime and Drawin 4E: Summary. Summary of studie s 245338-D through 245338AB. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1981 under 35902-EX-1; CDL:245338-C)

79566 Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H., Weil, C.S.; et al . (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik and Related Carbamates: Special Report 31 48. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX37; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:229032-D)

79604 Wacker Chemie GmbH (1974) The Metabolism of Butocarboxime. (Unpublished study

received 1975 under 3 5902-1; CDL:227600-A)

### Page 104 of 191 79867 Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Evaluation of Toxicological Data for Registration of Temik, Brand of Pesticide (UC-21149) Submitted with Letter of October 3, 1966. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1966 under 1016-EX-24 ; CDL:106627-A)

80223 Abdalla, N.A. (1981) Letter sent to J. Steve Lovell dated Jul 23, 1981: Grain sorghum fractionation studies. (Unpublished study received Jul 31, 1981 under 8F2107; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:070212-A)

80696 Smyth, H.F., Jr. (1966) Letter sent to H.A. Stansbury, Jr. dated Dec 1, 1966 Summary of toxicity information on compound 21149. Summary of studies 090072-C through 090072-E, 090072-G, 090072-H, 090072-N, 090072-Q, 090072-R and 090072-T. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F05 73; prepared by Ca rnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-A)

80697 Andrawes, N.R.; Dorough, H.W.; Lindquist, D.A. (1966) Degradation and Elimination of Temik 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl)oxime in Rats. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 unde r 7F0573; prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072- B)

80698 West, J.S.; Weil, C.S.; McGee, M.; et al. (1966) Temik (Compound 21149, Technical, 2- Methylthio-2-methylpropionaldehyde N-Methylcarbamoyloxime) Joint Action with Selected Organic Phosphate and Carbamat e Pesticides: Report 29-98. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-A)

80699 Johnson, H.E.; McGee, M.A.; King, J.M. (1966) Temik (Technical Grade Compound 21149) Demyelination Potential in Chickens: Report 29 -90. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-D)

80700 Johnson, H.E. (1966) Temik (Technical Grade Compound 21149): Comparative Behavioral Effect in Rats: Report 29-89. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL: 090072-E)

80701 Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.I.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G (10.5% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149): 15-day Dermal Applications to Rabbits: Report 298-80. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Ca rnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-G)

80702 Sexton, R.J. (1966) Toxicity of Temik^ (R)I. (Unpublished study r eceived Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-J)

80703 Ketcham, N.H. (1966) Agricultural Chemicals: Analyses of Urine Specimens for Metabolite of UC21149: Project No. 299A20. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-K)

80704 Peele, R.E. (1966) Industrial Hygiene--Air Pollution Evaluation of Hazards Associated with the Production of Compound 21149 & Formulation of Temik 10-G Insecticide: Report No. 66-IH-158-I-1. Includes methods dated Apr 26, 1966 and Jun 17, 1964. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp ., Charleston, W.V.; CDL:090072-L)

### Page 105 of 191 80705 Williams, F. (1966) Letter sent to J.T. Adam s, R.C. Back, D.F. Brau n, et al. dated Jun 2, 1966: Human exposure study in the field application of Temik 10G on cotton. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 u nder 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Co rp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-M)

80706 Beliles, R.P.; Knott, W.; Wright, L. (1966) UC-21149: Safety Evaluation on Fish and Wildlife: (Bobwhite Quail and Rainbow Trou t). (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Woodard Research Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-O)

80707 Knott, W.; Beliles, R.P. (1966) UC-21149: Acute Toxicity in Sunfish. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F 0573; prepared by Woodard Research Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-P)

80708 West, J.S.; Condra, N.I. (1966) Miscellaneous Acute Toxicity Data, Olefins Division: Report 28-140. (Unpublished stud y received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prep ared by CarnegieMellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-S)

80709 Knaak, J.B.; Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1965) Metabolism of UC 21149 in the Rat: Report 28-138. (Unpublished study received Ma r 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by CarnegieMellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Indust rial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-T)

80710 Carpenter, C.P.; Goldbe rg, M.E.; Johnson, H.E.; et al. (1965) Recapitulation of Pharmacodynamic and Acute Toxicity Studies on Temik (Compound 21149): Report 28-78. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Ca rnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-V)

80808 Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Introduction: Temik: Toxicity. Summary of study 090525- B. (Unpublished study received Jan 25 , 1966 under 6G04 73; CDL:090525-A)

80809 Smyth, H.F., Jr. (1966) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jan 25, 1966 Summary of toxicity reports on compound 21149. Summary of studies 090525-C through 090525-G, 090525-J through 0905 25-N and 090527-J. (Unpub lished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-B)

80810 Striegel, J.A.; Condra, N.I.; Haun, C.C.; et al. (1963) Range Finding Tests on Compound 21149 (2-Methylthio-2-methylpropionaldehyde N-Methylcarbamoyloxime): Report 25-53. (Unpublished study recei ved Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; pr epared by Mello n Institute of Industrial Research, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-C)

80811 Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.; McGee, M.A. (1965) A 4-hour Test for Evaluation of Comparative Skin Pene tration Hazard: Report 28-34. (U npublished study received Jan 25, 1965 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-F)

80812 West, J.S.; McGee, M. (1965) The Single Dose Peroral Toxicity of Compounds 20299, 21149, 19786 and 20047A for White Leghorn Cockerels: Report 28-30. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 u nder 6G0473; prepared by Mellon In stitute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL: 090525-J)

### Page 106 of 191 80813 Knaak, J.B.; Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1965) Metabolism of UC 21149 in the Rat: Report 28-138. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-L)

80814 Carpenter, C.P. (1966) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jan 25, 1966: 2 year feeding of UC 21149 (409-RD-89 reference 14 LK90) to dogs. (Unp ublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-N)

80815 Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Residue Data: UC 21149. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 un der 6G0473; CDL:090525-O)

80816 Romine, R.R. (19) The Determination of Residues of 2-Methyl-2(methylthio) Propionaldehyde O-(Methylcar bamoyl) Oxime, Systemic Insecticide UC 21149, in Agricultural Crops. Undated me thod. (Unpublished study r eceived Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-P)

80817 Crowder, R.A.; Johnson, H.E.; Romine, R.R. (1965) Letter sent to J.T. Adams; D.L. Heywood; R.C. Back; et al. dated Jul 14, 1965: The response of Temik metabolites and related materials to the method of analysis employed for Temik systemic insecticide. (Unpublished study recei ved Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; s ubmitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-Q)

80818 Stansbury, H.A.; Johnson, D. P. (1964) Agricultural Chemicals, Residue Analysis: Stability of 3-Chloro-5(or 6)-endo-cyanobicyclo(2.2.1)heptan-2-one N-Methylcarbamoyloxime (20047) and 2Methyl-2-methylthiopropionaldehyde N-Methylcarbamoyloxime (21149) in Animal Diets: Project No. 14 3B15. (Unpublished study receive d Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:09525-R)

80819 Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Metabolism of 21149 in Cotton and Potatoes. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473 ; CDL:090525-S)

80820 Coppedge, J.R.; Lindquist, D.A. (19) Preliminary Studies on the Fate of Radiolabeled Union Carbide 21149 in Soil and Cotton Plants. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div.; unpublished study; CDL:09525-T)

80821 Romine, R.R. (1966) Letter sent to R.G. Haines dated Jan 11, 1966 Interpretation of analytical results obtained by Temik residue method for agricultural crops. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-U)

80822 U.S. Public Health Service (1966) Report of Illness Associated with Use of the Experimental Insecticide, Temik. (Communicable Disease Cent er, Western Pesticides Research Laboratory; unpublished study; CDL:090527-B)

80823 Herrett, R.A.; Borash, A.J. (1967) Temi k Insecticide: Root Uptake, Distribution, and Disappearance of Temik in Spearmint and Bean: Project No. 111B16. (Unpublished study, including letters dated Feb 7, 1967 from R.A. Herrett to H.A. Stansbury and May 20, 1967 from H.A. Stansbury, Jr. to Harry W. Hays, received Mar 11, 1968 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090527-C)

80824 Durham, W.F. (1967) Letter sent to Chief, Office of Pesticides dated Jan 7, 1967: Quarterly memorandum of research progress, Western Pe sticides Research Laboratory, for period October-December, 1966. (U.S. Public Health Service, Comm unicable Disease Center, Office of Pesticides, Western Pesticides Research Laboratory; unpublished study; CDL:090527-D)

### Page 107 of 191 80825 Carpenter, C.P.; Condra, N.I.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G (10.5% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149): 15-day Dermal Applications to Rabbits: Report 29-80. (Unpublished study recei ved Mar 11, 1968 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp, New York, N.Y.; CDL:090527-I)

81182 Interregional Research Pr oject Number 4 (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: (Temik). (Unpublished study received Aug 10, 1977 under 7E 1996; CDL:097784-A)

81413 Weil, C.S.; Mazzoni, M.; Condra, N.I.; et al . (1966) Results of Long-term Tests for Mouse Skin Carcinogenicity of Three Process Residues, One Epoxide and Three Compounds: Report 29-34. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126498-A)

81414 Knaak, J.B.; Sullivan, L.J.; Tallant, M.J.; et al. (1965) Metabolism of UC 21149 in the Rat: Report 28-138. (Unpublished study received Jan 14, 1966 under 1016-E X-24; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126498-B)

81415 Pozzani, U.C.; Haun, C.C.; Kinkead, E. (1963) A Basis for Projecting the Probable Inhalation

Hazards of UC 21149 to Humans under Fiel d Use Conditions: Report 26-38. (Unpublished study received Jan 14, 1966 un der 1016-EX-24; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126498-C)

81550 Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (1978) Ethy lene Dibromide and Its Pesticidal Aternatives- -Toxicity, Persistence, and Pl ant Residues. (Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1979 under 5785-18; CDL:097779-Q)

81880 Stansbury, H.A.; Johnson, D. P. (1964) Stability of ... (20047) and ... (21149) in Animal Diets: File No. 2323. (Unpublished study received Jun 6, 1966 under 5G0452; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090493-X)

81883 Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Toxicity to Fish and Wildlife. (Compilation; unpublished study received May 10, 1965 un der 5G0452; CDL:090494-B)

85455 Herrett, R.A.; Bagley, W.P. (1966) Insecticide Temik: Metabolism and Distrubution in

Potato: 855-31107- 8020. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charle ston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-F)

85456 Weil, C.S.; Bernard, J.; Woodside, M.D.; et al. (1966) Insecticide Temik: Teratogenic Potential in Rats: Report 29 -81. (Unpublished study receive d Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL: 090072-H)

85457 Bartley, W.J.; Heywood, D.L. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Radiosynthesis of 2-Methyl-2- (methylthio) propionaldehyde o-(MethylC^14I-carbamoyl)oxime and Its Corresponding

Sulfoxide: 8553 1106-8048. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-I)

85458 Weil, C.S.; Woodside, M.D.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1966) Two-year Feeding of Compound 21149 in the Diet of Dogs: Report 29-5. (Unpublished study received Mar 2, 1967 under 7F0573; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090072-Q)

### Page 108 of 191 85460 Weil, C.S.; King, J.M.; Woodside, M.D.; et al. (1965) Two-year Feeding of Compound 21149 in the Diet of Rats: Report 28-123. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-K)

85461 Pozzani, U.C.; McGee, M.A.; Kinkead, E.R.; et al. (1966) Response of Rats Living for 28 Days on Topsoil Treated with UC21149 10G1: Repo rt 29-2. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1966 under 6G0473; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090525-M)

86606 Andrawes, N.A. (1981) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analyti cal Method Used: Temik. (Unp ublished study received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:070447-A)

86607 Myers, W.R.; Harrison, S.L. (1981) Re sidues: Temik^(R)I/Grapes: Project No. 813C50. (Unpublished study r eceived Nov 2, 1981 un der 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc ., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:070447-B)

86608 Union Carbide Corporation (1978) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Grapes by Gas Chromatography. Method Aldicarb-FPD-general dated Aug 1978. (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330; CDL:070447-C)

86609 Union Carbide Corporation (1977) Confirmatory Procedure for the Identification of Aldicarb Residues Utilizing a Non-polar GLC Column. Method Aldiccarb-FPD- confirmatory dated Feb 1977. (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1981 under 264-330; CDL: 070447-D)

86610 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1981) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik. (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 198 1 under 264-330; CDL: 070446-A)

90570 Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Temik(TM) 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide: (Active Ingredient--UC 21149): F-40977C. (Unpublished study recei ved Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-30; CDL:131932-A)

90572 Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Available Toxicity Data. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131945-A)

90573 Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Results of Tests Conducted by and under the Supervision of Federal and State Agencies with UC 21149 Formulations on Ornamental Plant Pest Control--1962-1964. (C ompilation; unpublished study recei ved Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131945-B)

91233 Union Carbide Corporation (1965) Summary of Selected Performance of UC 21149 on

Various Pests on Cotton and Potatoes 1964-19 65. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL:090526-C)

91234 Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Summary and Discussion: Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL:090526-D)

91235 Stansbury, H.A.; Wright, M.P. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Standard Samples for Residue Analyses: 855-31106- 7965. (Unpublished study receive d Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-F)

### Page 109 of 191 91236 Williams, F. (1966) Letter sent to J.T. Adams, N.H. Ketcham, R.C. Back and others dated Jun 2, 1966: Human exposure study in the field application of Temik 10G on cotton. (Unpublished study recei ved Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Un ion Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-J)

91237 Union Carbide Corporation (19) Cholinesterase. Undated method. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; CDL: 090526-K)

91238 Peele, R.E. (1966) Industrial Hygiene--Air Pollution Evaluation of Hazards Associated with the Production of Compound 21149 & Formulation of Temik 10-G Insecticide: Report No. 66-IH-158-I-1. Includes method 38C-21V5-R2.1 dated Apr 26, 1966 and method 38C-22M2- 22 dated Jun 17, 1966. (Unpublished study recei ved Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-L)

91239 Ketcham, N.H. (1966) Agricultural Chemicals: Analyses of Urine Specimens for Metabolite

of UC21149: File No. 5882. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-M)

91240 Sexton, R.J. (1966) Toxicity of Temik^(R)I. (Unpublished study, including letter dated Jul 11, 1966 from R.J. Sexton to L.B. Weddell, received Jul 26, 1966 unde r 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-N)

91241 West, J.S.; Condra, N.I. (1966) Miscellaneous Acute Toxicity Data: Report 28-140. (Unpublished study received Ju l 26, 1966 under 6G0473; prep ared by Mello n Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-R)

91242 Dernehl, C.U. (1966) Letter sent to J.S. Leary, Jr. dated Jul 12, 1966 Human poisoning by UC 21149, Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 6G0473; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, N.Y.; CDL:090526-W)

91958 Ridgway, R.L.; Cowan, C.B. (1966) A Report on Laboratory and Field Studies on the Effect

of Several Insecticides on Be neficial Arthropods in 1966: Mobay 20268. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomolo gy Research Div., Cotton Insects Systemic Chemicals Investigations and Southwestern Cotton Insects Investigations; unpublished study; CDL:120463-D)

92405 Borash, A.J. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide Agricultural Products. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; s ubmitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:131946-A)

92605 Abdellatif, M.A.; Hermanson, H.P.; Reynolds, H.T. (1967) Effect of soil clay and organic matter content upon systemic efficacy of two carbamate insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology 60 (5):1445- 1450. (Also In unpublis hed submission received Sep 25, 1968 under 8F0711; submitted by FMC Corp., Middleport, N.Y.; CDL:091231-C)

92769 Lin, S.C.; Funke, B.R.; Sc hulz, J.T. (1972) Effects of so me organophosphate and carbamate insecticides on nitrification and legume growth. Plant and Soil 37:489-496. (Also in unpublished submission received Mar 30, 1977 under 279-2712; submitted by FMC Corp., Philadelphia, Pa.; CDL:229241-E)

93021 Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Temik 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide (Active Ingredient--UC 21149). New York, N.Y.: Union Carbide. (F-40977C, Mar 1966; also in unpublished submission received Oct 20, 1967 under 1016-EX-30; CDL:131932-A)

### Page 110 of 191 93628 Union Carbide (1967) Summary: Toxicological Studies on Temik. Summary of study 090714-C. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 8F0637; CDL:090714-A)

93629 Union Carbide (1967) Summary and Discussion: Temik Residue Studies. Includes methods dated Aug 18, 1967. (Compila tion; unpublished study receive d on unknown date under 8F0637; CDL: 090714-D)

93630 Union Carbide (1966) Summary of Data on Metabolism of Temik in the Cotton Plant. Summary of study 090714-G. (Unpublished study received D ec 29, 1966 under 8F0637; CDL:090714-F)

93631 Union Carbide (1967) Performance Data: Temik 10G--Cotton. (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under 8F0637; CD L:090714-H)

93632 Haines, R.G. (1967) Temik^(TM)I 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide: F-40977D. (Unpublished study received on unknown date un der 8F0637; submitted by Union Carbide, South Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090714-I)

93640 Coppedge, J.R.; Lindquist, D.A.; Bull, D. L.; et al. (1966) A Re port on 2-Methyl-2- (methylthio)propionaldehydeO(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (Temik) in Cotton Plants and Soil. (Unpublished study received Feb 27, 1967 unde r 7F0573; prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station, Entomology Research Div., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090741-B)

93641 Borash, A.J. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Re lative Soil Persistence of Sulfide, Sulfoxide, and Sulfone: Status Report 8 55-311078157. (Unp ublished study received Feb 27, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL: 090741-C)

93642 Coppedge, J.R. (1967) Fate of 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehydeO- (methylcarbamoyl)oxime (Temik) in Plants and Soil. Master's thesis, Texas A & M Univ. (Unpublished study recei ved Feb 27, 1967 unde r 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090741-D)

93643 Stansbury, H.A.; Wright, M.P. (1966) Insecticide, Temik: Standard Samples for Residue Analyses: Status Report 855- 31106-7965. (Unp ublished study received Feb 27, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, W.Va.; CDL:090741-E)

93644 Union Carbide Corporation (1966) Summary and Discussion of Results of Tests with Temik 10G on Potatoes 1965-1966. (Compilation; un published study received Feb 27, 1967 under 7F0573; CDL: 090741-F)

93645 Bull, D.L.; Lindquist, D.A.; Coppedge, J.R. (1966) A Report on Metabolism of 2-Methyl-2- (methylthio)propionaldehydeO-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (Temik) in Insects. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., Cotton Insects Systemic Chemicals Investigations; unpublished study; CDL:090741-G)

93913 Westlake, G.E.; Bunyan, P.J.; Martin, A.D.; et al. (1981) Carbamat e poisoning: Effects of selected carbamate pesticides on plasma en zymes and brain esterases of Japanese quail (Coturnix cotornix japonica). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 29(4):779-784. (AlsoInunpublished submission r eceived Jan 26, 1982 under 239- 2471; submitted by Chevron Chemical Co., Richmond, Calif.; CDL:246657-J)

94799 Ivie, D.A. (1981) Letter sent to Donald Stubbs dated Oct 28, 1981 Concerning the use of Aldicarb to control citrus nematodes in grapefruit orchards. (Texas, Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural & Environmental Sciences Div., unpublished study, including undated letter from E.L. Johnson to David A. Ivie; CDL: 246256-A)

### Page 111 of 191 95927 Dorough, H.W. (1970) Metabolism of insectic idal methylcarbamates in animals. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistr y 18(6): 1015-1022. (AlsoInunpublished submission received Jan 18, 1971 under 9F0843; submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, D.C.; CDL:093138-AC)

96543 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1982) Monitoring Aldicarb Residues in Soil and Water, 1981. (Compilati on; unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330; CDL:246960-A)

96544 Hansen, J.L.; Hendrix, C.D. (1982) Comments on Intera and Cornell Aldicarb Transport Simulation for Eastern Long Island: File No . 29840. (Unpublished st udy received Mar 9, 1982 under 264330; submitted by Union Carbid e Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:246960-B)

96545 Andrawes, N.R. (1982) Response to EPA's Conclusions Relative to Aldicarb Environmental Fate: Project No. 813C51. (Unpublished stud y received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Produc ts Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 246960-C)

96546 Andrawes, N.R.; Heintzelman, R.W. (1982) Plant Uptake of Temik^(R)I Aldicarb Pesticide

from Soil: File No. 29920. (Unpublished study received Ma r 9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Produc ts Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 246960-D)

96547 Spiegel, M.H.; Conway, R.A. (1982) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and Aldicarb Sulfone: Project III. (Unpublished study received Ma r 9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:246960-E)

96548 Hansen, J.L. (1982) Letter sent to R.C. Ba ck dated Feb 19, 1982: Hydrolysis interpolations: Project IIIa. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL:246960-F)

96549 Technicon Industrial Systems (1981) Preliminary Method for the Determination of Aldicarb and Its Oxidative Methabolities (sic) in Potable Water as Total Aldicarb Sulfone Equivalence. (Unpublished study, including letters dated Nov 16, 1981 from T.M. Martin to K.A. Mede and Nov 18, 1981 from J.C. Daly to T.M. Martin, received Mar 9, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Produc ts Co., Inc., Ambler, Pa.; CDL: 246960-G)

96550 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Incorporated (1982) A Rating System for Predicting the Appearance of Aldicarb Residues in Potable Water. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1981 under 264-330; CDL:246960-J)

96557 Myers, W.R.; Harrison, S.L. (1982) Re sidues: Temik^(R)I/Tomatoes: File No. 29948. Includes method dated Aug 1977. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1982 under 8F2096; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:070711-A)

98468 Stauffer Chem ical Company (1980) Comparison of Acute Oral Avian Toxicology between Dyfonate^(R)I 20-G Insecticide and Other Corn Granular Insecticides. (Unpublished study received Oct 24, 1980 under 476-2028; CDL:243582-A)

100230 Clarkson, V.A.; Haines, R.G.; Hennsley, W.H.; et al. (1969) Report on Additional Field Tests with Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on the Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study received Oct 27, 1969 under 1016-EX- 30; submitted by Un ion Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126506-B)

### Page 112 of 191 100231 Lund, R.C.; Haines, R.G. (1969) Field Evaluation of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide Potential

Hazard to White-tail Deer and Cottontail Rabb its from Simulated Spills. (Unpublished study received Oct 27, 1969 under 1016 -EX-30; prepared in cooperation with New Jersey, Fish and Game Commission, Black River State Game Field Station, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126506-C)

100232 Back, R.C. (1969) Letter sent to Harold G. Alford dated Aug 22, 1969: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide--First periodic report. (Unpublishe d study received Aug 25, 1969 under 1016-EX30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:126506-D)

100296 Clarkson, V.A.; Hensley, W.H. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Toxicity of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide, and Temik Sulfone to Bluegill Sunfish: File No. 10493. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitte d by Union Carbide Co rp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:096727-B)

100381 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Feeding in the Diet of Rats for Three or Six Months: Report 31- 142. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; CDL:096728-A)

100382 Striegel, J.; Condra, N.; Haun, C. (1963) Acute Toxicity of Compound (21865): Special Report 26-29. (Unpublished study received Jan 25 , 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-B)

100383 Weil, C.; Condra, N.; White, C. (1969) Te mik Sulfone: Single Rabbit Skin Penetration Studies: Special Report 32-78. (Unpublished st udy received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-C)

100384 Nycum, J.; Kinkead, E.; Lauffer, J.; et al. (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik (Sulfone): Special Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-D)

100385 Weil, C.; Condra, N.; Geary, D.; et al. (1973) UC 21865; Technical ... Range Finding Toxicity Studies: Special Report 36-26. (Unpublished st udy received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-E)

100386 Weil, C. (1974) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: UC 21865: Special Report 37-10. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 un der 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-F)

100387 Babish, J.; Salerno, A. (1977) Neurotoxicity Evaluation of UC 21865 in White Leghorn Hens (Gallus domesticus): Laborato ry No. 5233. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Food and Drug Research Laboratories, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-M)

100388 Woodside, M.; Weil, C.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1977) Aldicarb Sulfone: 18-month Feeding in the Diet of Mice: Project Report 4038. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-O)

### Page 113 of 191 100389 Weil, C. (1970) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Temik: Special Report 33-18. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-T)

100390 Weil, C.; McGee, M.; Baughman, J. (1970) Sulf ocarb: Miscellaneous Single Dose Peroral and Parenteral LD50 Assays and Some Joint Action Studies: Special Report 33-7. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-U)

100391 Weil, C. (1970) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Temik: Special Report 33-92. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-V)

100392 Weil, C.; Condra, N.; Geary, D.; et al. (1973) UC 21865 Formulation 22RZB-75-B; 50W: Range Finding Toxicity Studies: Special Report 36 -24. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-X)

100393 Weil, C.; Burton, D.; Calisti, L. (1974) UC 21865 Technical, UC 21865--75% WP, Peroral Intubation of Rats with or without Subsequent Dose(s) of Atropine: Special Report 37-60. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by CarnegieMellon Univ., Div. of Sponsored Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-AA)

100394 Nycum, J.; Kinkead, E.; Lau ffer, J.; et al. (1968) Toxic ity Studies on the Probable Noncarbamate Plant Metabolites of Temik: Special Report 31-30. (Unp ublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-AB)

100398 Frazier, H. ( 1977) Sulfocarb Formulatio n Study. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096728-AH)

100401 Stier, E. (1971) Summary on Sensory Evaluation of Potato Samples: Temik. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 unde r 101679; prepared by Rutgers Univ., Dept. of Food Science, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-C)

100402 Stier, E. (1972) Sensory Evaluation Report on Peanuts. (U npublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Rutgers Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-D)

100403 Holland, R. (1976) Letter sent to A. Dawson dated Oct 5, 1976: Taste test: Effect of experimental pesticide on Valencia orange flavor. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 101679; prepared by Sunkist Growers, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-E)

100404 Foremost Foods Co. (1977) Difference Testing: Kidney Beans: Control Versus Temik Treated. (Unpublished study r eceived Jan 25, 1978 under 10 16-79; submit ted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-F)

### Page 114 of 191 100405 Foremost Research Center (1977) Difference Testing: Fresh Tomatoes--Control Versus

Temik Treated: Tomato Juice--Control Versus Temik Treated: Tomato Paste--Control Versus Temik Treated. (Unpublished st udy received Jan 25, 1978 un der 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-G)

100406 Vieira, M. (1977) Letter sent to P. Schroeder dated Jul 19, 1977 Efficacy of Temik in coffee beans. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; prepared by Union Carbide de Brasil S.A., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-H)

100407 Ough, C. (1977) Letter sent to P. Darst dated Feb 1, 1977 Results of wine tasting: Temik treated grapes. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79 ; prepared by Univ. of California--Davis, Dept. of Viticulture and Enology, Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-I)

100408 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Animal F eeding Acceptance: Temik 10G. Summary of study 096734-K. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; CDL:096734-J)

100409 Haines, R. (1 970) Field Evaluations of Potential Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants: Trial Two. (Unpub lished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096734-K)

100694 Intera Environmental Consultants, Inc. (1982) Effects of Varying Input Load and Degradation Rates on Simulated Regional Movement of Aldicarb in Ground Water in Long Island. Rev. (Unpublished study recei ved May 5, 1982 under 264-33 0; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc ., Ambler, PA; CDL: 247403-A)

101902 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) The Name, Chemical Identity and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69; CDL: 005151-A)

101903 Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Efficacy of Temik on Vari ous Crops. (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 u nder 1016-69; CDL:005151-B)

101904 Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Temik 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide (Active Ingredient- -UC 21149): Technical Information for Testing Purposes: F-40977C. Summary of studies 005593-A through 005593- C and 005594-B. (Unpublished study received Jul 19, 1966 under 1016-69; CDL:005592-A)

101905 Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Transfer of Aldicarb from Temik 10G to Untreated Corn Cob Grits under Varied Temperature and Humidity Conditions. (Unpublishe d study received Nov 24, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:024305-A)

101906 Union Carb ide Corp. (19) Shelf Life of Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Oct 29, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:024310-C)

101907 Ridgway, R.; Stokes, R.; Coppedge, J. (1969) Laboratory Evaluations of Release

Characteristics of Various Carbon Based Granul ar Formulations of Aldicarb (Temik). (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div.; unpublished study; CDL:024310- D)

101908 Back, R. (1969) Netherlands and Germany: Temik 10G Marketing: Summary Report. (Unpublished study recei ved on unknown date under 1016- 69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:024310-E)

### Page 115 of 191 101909 Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: The Potential Hazard from Ingestion of Treated Plant Tissue. (Unpublished stu dy received Nov 5, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:024310-F)

101910 Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Residues: Temik 10G and Temik 15G. (Unpublished study received Jun 21, 1974 under 1016-78; CDL: 026641-A)

101911 Haines, R. (1971) Ingestion of Aldicarb by Human Volunteers: A Controlled Study of the

Effects of Aldicarb on Man. (Unpublished study received Ap r 12, 1971 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:050847-A)

101912 Union Carbide Corp. (1971) (Toxicity Studies of Temik 10G on Humans). (Compilation; unpublished study receive d Apr 12, 1971 under 101 6-69; CDL:050847-B)

101913 Dernehl, C. (1971) Letter sent to R. Back dated Mar 30, 1971 Temik use on ornamentals. (Unpublished study receive d Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbid e Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:050847-C)

101914 Weil, C.; McGee, M.; Baughman, J. (1970) Comparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of Temik 10GV and 15 Other Pesticide Formulations As Marketed: Special Report 33-15. (Unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 u nder 1016-69; prepared by Ca rnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:050847-D)

101915 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Nature and Magnitude of Residues in Certain Ornamental Plants, Greenhouse Soils and Water. (Unpublished study received Apr 12, 1971 under 1016-69; CDL:050847-E)

101916 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik 10G. Summary of studies 091000-B through 091000-F. (Unpublished study received May 3, 19 72 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-A)

101917 Weil, C. (1971) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: Special Report 33-92. (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F 1188; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-B)

101918 Weil, C.; Woodside, M.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1 970) Temik: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Mice for 7 Days: Special Report 33-59. (Unp ublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-C)

101919 Weil, C.; Woodside, M.; Bernard, J.; et al. (1970) Temik (T), Temik Sulfoxide (TSO), Temik Sulfone (TSO2), 1:1 TSO:TSO2: Results of Feeding in the Diet of Rats for 7 Days: Special Report 33-81. (Unpublished study received Ma y 3, 1972 under 2F 1188; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-D)

101920 Dorough, H. (1970) Effect of Temik on Methyl Parathion Toxicity to Mice: PR-2771. (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 unde r 2F1188; prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-E)

101921 Schlinke, J. (1970) Toxicologic effects of five soil nematocides in chickens. American Journal of Veterinary Research 31(6): 1119-1121. (Also In unpublis hed submission received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091000-F)

### Page 116 of 191 101922 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. Summary of study 091000-H. (Unpublished study received May 3, 19 72 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-G)

101923 Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Magnitude of the Residues: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received May 3, 1972 un der 2F1188; CDL:091000-I)

101924 Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Beef Liver by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-J)

101925 Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Summary of Performance Data-- Sugarcane and Sweet Potatoes (Louisiana Only ). (Unpublished study received May 3, 1972 under 2F1188; CDL:091000-K)

101926 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Residue Studies of Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 unde r 9F0798; CDL:091371-A)

101928 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Residue Studies of Temik in Plants and Animals. Summary of studies 091372-B through 091372-Q. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL: 091372-A)

101929 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Metabolism of C14Temik in Cotton Plants

under Field Conditions: File No . 10492. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-D)

101930 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; He rrett, R. (1968) Degradation of Te mik ... in Potato Foliage: File No. 10495. (Unpublished study received Apr 18 , 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-F)

101931 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Metabolism and Associated Residues of Temik in Spearment and Lettuce: File No. 10496. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL: 091372-G)

101932 Dorough, H. (1968) Continual Feeding of Radio-labeled Temik to Lactating Dairy Cows. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepar ed by Texas A and M Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-H)

101933 Dorough, H. (1968) Continuous Feeding of Radiolabeled Temik to Laying Hens. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepar ed by Texas A and M Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-I)

101934 Bull, D.; Coppedge, J.; Ridgway, R. (19) Fa te of Temik in Soil with Special Reference to Chemical Changes, Movement, and Volatilization. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div., Cotton Insects Systemic Chemicals Investigations; unpublished study; CDL:091372-J)

101935 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Temik Metabolism: Fate of C14-Temik in

Cultivated Soil: File No . 9218. (Unpublished study received Apr 18 , 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-K)

101936 Clarkson, V.; Weiden, M. (1968) Temik In secticide: The Persistence of Temik in an Agricultural Soil As Indicated by Field and Laboratory Bioassay: File No. 10490. (Unpublished study recei ved Apr 18, 1969 unde r 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-L)

### Page 117 of 191101937 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1968) Temik Metabolism: Degradation and Carryover Properties of ... (Temik) in Soil: File No. 10494. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL: 091372-M)

101938 Spurr, H.; Chancey, E. (1968) Temik In secticide: Interactions between Temik and Microorganisms and Their Importance to Ecological Relationships in Soil: File No. 9208. (Unpublished study recei ved Apr 18, 1969 unde r 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-N)

101939 Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R.; et al. ( 1968) Temik Insecticide: Field Evaluation of the

Persistence and Movement of Temik and Its Carbamate Metabolites in Soil: File No. 10485. (Unpublished study recei ved Apr 18, 1969 unde r 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-O)

101940 Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Field Evaluation of the

Persistence of Temik and Its Carbamate Metabolites in Pond Water and Their Effect on Pond

Fauna: File No. 10491 . (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091372-Q)

101941 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Full Reports of Investigations Made with Respect to the Safety of the Pesticide Chemical: Temik. Summary of studies 005593-C, 005594-B, 091373-B through 091373D, 091373-F through 091373-J, 091373-L, 091373-N through 091373-P, 091373-R through 091373-U, 091373-W, 091373-Y, 091373-Z, 091373-AB, 091373-AC,
126467-A, 1264 84-D, 126486-A, 126494 -A, 131933-A. (U npublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-A)

101942 Weil, C.; Condra, N.; White, C.; et al. (1968) Temik 10 G-V (10.3% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149): Acute and 14-day Applications to Rabbits: Special Report 31-137. (Unpublished study recei ved Apr 18, 1969 unde r 9F0798; prepared by Mellon Institute, Industrial Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-D)

101943 Pozzani, U.; Kinkead, E.; Geary, D.; et al. (1968) Temik 10G and Temik 10G-V: Response of Rats to Saturated Vapors Generated under Simulated Greenhouse Conditions: Special Report 31-173. (Unpublished st udy received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepar ed by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-F)

101944 Williams, F. (1964) Agricultural Chemicals Compound 21149: Air Sampling While Formulating at Chemical Formulators, Inc. (Unpublished study receive d Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-G)

101945 Williams, F. (1964) Agricultural Chemicals Compound 21149: Air Sampling during Second Formulations at Chemical Formulators, Inc. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-H)

101946 Williams, F. (1965) Air Sampling Report for Agricultural Chemical Compound 21149. (Unpublished study recei ved Apr 18, 1969 unde r 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL: 091373-I)

101947 Peele, R. (1966 ) Industrial Hygiene--Air Pollution Evaluation of Hazar ds Associated with the Production of Compound 21149 & Formulation of Temik 10-G Insecticide: Report No. 66- IH-158-I-1. (Unpublishe d study received Apr 18, 1969 un der 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-J)

101948 Union Carbide Corp. (1966) (Toxicity of Temik to Humans). (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL:091373-L)

### Page 118 of 191 101952 Weil, C.; Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1968) The Toxicity of Temik and Its Metabolites in Mint and Lettuce: Special Repo rt 31-156. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; prepared by Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-R)

101953 Johnstone, V. (1967) Alleged Temik--Cherry Poisoning Incident, Wenatchee, Washington. (Unpublished study recei ved Apr 18, 1969 unde r 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-S)

101954 Union Carbide Corp. (1967) Waddell Case: Toxicity of Temik to Humans. (Compilation; unpublished study receive d Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL:091373-T)

101955 Dernehl, C. (1969) Letter sent to R. Hain es dated Jan 9, 1969 Consideration of possible hazard to humans handling cotton plants treate d with Temik. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-U)

101956 Back, R. (1968) Temik 10 G Granular Pesticide: Field Ev aluation of Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study received Apr 18, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:091373-AB)

101957 Lavoie, K. (1963) Bioassay Record: UC-21149: Peromyscus: Test No. R-14. (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver Wildlife Research Ce nter; unpublished study, CDL:091373-AC)

101958 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Efficacy of Temik 10G on Cotton. (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798; CD L:092003-A)

101959 Lund, R.; Haines, R. (1969) Field Evaluation of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide: Potential

Hazard to White-tail Deer and Cottontail Rabb its from Simulated Spills. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; prepared in cooperation with New Jersey, Fish and Game Commission, Black River State Game Field Station, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-B)

101960 Clarkson, V.; Haines, R.; Hennsley, W.; et al. (1969) Report on Additional Field Tests with

Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on the Potentia l Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 un der 0F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Co rp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-C)

101961 Haines, R. (1 970) Field Evaluation of Potential Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants: Trial I. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-D)

101962 Haines, R. (1 970) Field Evaluations of Potential Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants: Trial II . (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-E)

101963 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Discussion of Performance: Temik 10G-Sugar Beets. (Compilation; unpublished study received Au g 20, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:091748-F)

101964 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Metabolism in Plants: Temik. Summary of studies 091748-H through 0917 48-J and 091748-L. (Unpub lished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:091748-G)

### Page 119 of 191 101965 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1970) Metabolism of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide ... in Sugar Beets. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-I)

101966 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Magnitude of the Residues: Aldicarb in Sugar Beets. (Compilation; unpublished study received Au g 20, 1970 under 0F10 08; CDL:091748-K)

101967 Dorough, H. (1970) Extraction of Radioactive Residues from Liver of Cow Fed 1.2 ppm

Aldicarb-Aldicarb Sulfon e-C14 in the Diet for 14 Days. (Unpublished study received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; prepared by Univ. of Kentucky, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:091748-L)

101968 Union Carb ide Corp. (1969) So il: Decline of Aldicar b. (Unpublished stu dy received Aug 20, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:091748-M)

101969 Union Carbide Corp. (1967) Continual Feed ing of Radio-labeled Temik to Lactating Dairy Cows. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 7F0573; CDL:092861-A)

101970 Maitlen, J.; McDonough, L.; Beroza, M. (1966) Determination of 2-Methyl-2- (methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl) oxime, Its Sulfoxide and Sulfone, by Gas Chromatography. (U.S. Agricultural Research Service, Entomology Research Div.; unpublished study; CDL:092861-B)

101971 Union Carbide Co rp. (1967) Efficacy Studies of Te mik on Potatoes. (Compilation; unpublished study receive d Aug 22, 1967 under 7F 0573; CDL:092861-E)

101972 Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Study of the Chemical Temik 10G. (Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 23, 1967 un der 7F0573; CDL:092861-F)

101973 Romine, R. (1966) Determination of Temik Residues in Potatoes. (Unpublished study received Feb 23, 1967 under 7F0573; submitte d by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, WV; CDL:092861-G)

101974 Romine, R. (1966) Determination of Temi k Residues in Soil. (Unpublished study received Feb 23, 1967 under 7F0573; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Charleston, WV; CDL:092861-H)

101975 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Continual Feeding of Radiolabeled Temik to Chickens. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 8F0637; CDL:092931-A)

101976 Romine, R. (1967) Determination of Temik Residues in Cottonseed: (A Total Toxic Residues Method). (Unpublished study r eceived on unknown date under 8F0637; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., South Charleston, WV; CDL:092931-C)

101977 Andrawes, N.; Romine, R.; Bagley, W. (1973) Metabolism and residues of Temik aldicarb pesticide in cotton foliage and seed under field conditions. J. Agr. Food Chem. 21(3):379-386. (Also In unpublished submission received Jul 24, 1973 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-A)

101978 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Determination of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Cottonseed by Gas Chromatography: Basic Cottonseed Method: UC 21149-III-COTS. (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 unde r 9F0798; CDL: 093106-B)

101979 Back, R. (1970) Letter sent to G. Rohwer dated Jul 22, 1970: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide for use on cotton only. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-C)

### Page 120 of 191 101980 Dernehl, C. (1970) Letter sent to R. Back dated Jul 13, 1970 Possible Temik poisoning of humans. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-D)

101981 Back, R. (1970) Letter sent to H. Hays dated May 12, 1970: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide for use on cotton only. (U npublished study receive d on unknown date under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-E)

101982 Romine, R. (1969) Letter sent to H. Alford dated Nov 12, 1969: Temik 10G, aldicarb pesticide for cotton pest control. (Unpub lished study received on unknown date under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-G)

101983 Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: The Potential Hazard from Ingestion of Treated Plant Tissue. (Unpublished stu dy received on unknown date under 9F0798; CDL:093106-H)

101984 Back, R. (1969) Letter sent to H. Alford dated Oct 29, 1969: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide. (Unpublished study recei ved Oct 29, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Un ion Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-I)

101985 Herrett, R. (1967) Letter sent to H. Stansb ury dated Feb 7, 1967 Results of studies on the uptake of Temik by spearmint and tendergree n bean. (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093106-L)

101986 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Dermal Toxicity of Formulated Products to Rats: (Four Hour Skin Penetration). (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 9F0798; CDL:093106-N)

101987 Union Carbide Corp. (19) Protocol for Evaluation of Exposure Hazard to Greenhouse Operators Using Temik 10G. (Unpublished st udy received Jan 24, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL:093106-O)

101988 Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Study of the Chemical Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 14, 1969 under 9F0798; CDL: 093106-R)

101989 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1 969 under 9F0798; CDL:093106-V)

101990 Union Carbide Technical Center (19) Determ ination of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Milk by Gas Chromatography: UC 21149-III-Milk. (Unpublished st udy received Jun 29, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL: 093318-B)

101991 Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Determination of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Beef Liver by Gas Chromatography: UC 21149-IIILiver. (Unp ublished study received Jun 29, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:093318-C)

101992 Union Carbide Technical Center (19) Determ ination of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Sugar Beet Roots by Gas Chromatography: UC 211 49-III-SBR. (Unpublishe d study received Jun 29, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:093318-D)

101993 Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Determination of the Total Toxic Temik Residue in Sugar Beet Tops: UC 21149-III-SBT. (U npublished study received Ju n 29, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:093318-E)

### Page 121 of 191 101994 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Jun 29, 1970 under 0F1008; CDL:093318-F)

101995 Union Carbide Corp. (1972) Response to EPA Comments on Pesticide Petition 2F1188: Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; CDL:093511-A)

101996 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1971) Metabolism of ... (Temik aldicarb pesticide) in potato plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 19(4):731-7 37. (Also In un published submission received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093511-B)

101997 Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Sugarcane Stalk by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; CDL:093511-F)

101998 Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Sweet Potato Root by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; CDL:093511-G)

101999 Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Determination of Total Toxic Residues in Sugarcane Leaves by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study receive d Aug 6, 1971 under 2F1188; CDL:093511- H)

102000 Weil, C. (1974) Summary of Interpretation ofPreviously Presented Toxicity Data and Safetyfactor Calculations for Aldicarb. (Unpublis hed study received on unknown date under 3F1414; prepared in cooperation with Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093775-A)

102001 Meeker, R. (1974) Response to EPA Letter of D ecember 19, 1973 (Items 1,2 and 3) Regarding Pesticide Petition 3F1414 and Subsequent Discussion between EPA and UCC, January 11, 1974. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., New York, NY; CDL:093775-D)

102002 Williams, C. (1973) Memorandum of a Te lephone Conversation. (Telephone conversation with R. Back; unpublished st udy received on unknown date under 3F1414; prepared in cooperation with U.S. ABPR, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL: 093775-F)

102003 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Efficacy Study of Temi k on Various Crop s. (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under 3F1414; CDL: 093775-G)

102004 Union Carbide Corp. (19) Determination of Total Toxic Aldicarb Residues in Peanuts by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Ju n 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093775-H)

102005 Union Carbide Corp. (19) Determination of Total Aldicarb Residues in Potato Tubers by Gas Chromatography. (Unpublished study received Ju n 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093775-I)

102006 Union Carbide Corp. (1973) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093775- J)

102007 Union Carbide Corp. (1973) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Methods Used: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 u nder 3F1414; CDL:093776-A)

### Page 122 of 191 102008 Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. Summary of studies 093511-B, 093776-D through 093776-F. (U npublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093776-B)

102009 Andrawes, N.; Moorefield, H. (1972) The Metabolism and Terminal Residues of Temik

Aldicarb Pesticide in Peanut Plants under Fi eld Conditions: Project No. 111A12; File No. 17613. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093776-D)

102011 Lykins, H. (1969) Temik Insecticide: The Ef fect of Temperature and pH on the Stability of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone in Water: Project No. 111A13. (Unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 unde r 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093776-G) 102012 Union Carbide Corp. (1972) Residue Data for Aldicarb on Potatoes and Potato Chips. (Compilation; unpublished study received Ju n 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093777-A)

102013 Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Residue Data for Aldicarb: Peanuts. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jun 25, 1973 u nder 3F1414; CDL:093777-B)

102014 Union Carbide Corp. (1972) Summary and Discussion of Results of Tests with Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on Potatoes. (Compilation; unpublished study recei ved Jun 25, 1973 under 3F1414; CDL:093779-A)

102015 Hodges, L. (1973) Letter sent to L. Terbush dated Nov 13, 1973: Aldicarb pesticide for use on potatoes and peanuts. (Unpublished study received Nov 13, 1973 under 3F1414; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093781-A)

102016 Reed, J.; Stier, E. (1969) Flavor Evalua tion Report on Potatoes Treated with Aldicarb Pesticides. (Unpublished study received Nov 13 , 1973 under 3F1414; prepared by Rutgers Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, DC; CDL:093781-B)

102017 Union Carbide Corp. (1975) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Oct 1, 1975 under 6G1689; CDL:095060- A)

102018 Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Aldicarb: Residues in Meat, Milk, Soil and Various Crops. (Compilation; unpublished study received Oc t 1, 1975 under 6G16 89; CDL:095060-B)

102019 Union Carbide Corp. (1975) The Name, Chemical Identity, and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL:096130- A)

102020 Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Discussion of Temik Performance against Nematode and Insect Pests of Coffee. (Compilation; unpublished st udy received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL:096130-B)

102021 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik. (Unpublished study received May 6, 19 77 under 1016-69; CDL:096130-C)

102022 Andrawes, N.; Dorough, H.; Lindquist, D. (1967) Degradation and elimination of Temik in rats. Journal of Economic Entomology 60(4):979-987. (Also In unpublished submission received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Co., Arlington, VA; CDL:096131-O)

### Page 123 of 191 102023 Knaak, J.; Tallant, M.; Sullivan, L. (1966) The metabolism of 2-methyl-2- (methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methyl-carbamoyl)oxime in the rat. J. Agr. Food Chem. 14(6):573-578. (Also In unpublis hed submissi on received May 6, 19 77 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096131-P)

102024 Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Residue Studies of Aldicarb on Coffee. (Compilation; unpublished study received May 6, 19 77 under 1016-69; CDL:096131-T)

102025 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Discussion of Performance: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received Ju l 13, 1976 under 1016 -69; CDL:096175-A)

102026 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Aug 9, 1977 under 1016-78; CDL: 096302-B)

102027 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 9, 1977 un der 101678; CDL:096302-U)

102028 Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Reasonable Grounds in Support of the Petition: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished study received Aug 9, 1977 under 1016-7 8; CDL:096302-V)

102029 Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Alleged Overexposure Cases Reported from Use of Temik Formulations. (Unpublished study received Au g 9, 1977 under 1016-7 8; CDL:096302-W)

102031 Union Carbide Co rp. (1976) Efficacy of Temik Aldi carb Pesticide on Pecan Aphids. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 10, 1977 under 1016-78; CDL:096319-A)

102035 Abdalla, N. (1977) Letter sent to F. Sanders dated Oct 19, 19 77 Efficacy of Temik on various crops. (Unpublished study received Oct 26, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096396-A)

102036 Heitmuller, T. (1972) Letter sent to S. Ichikawa dated Jan 7, 1972 Toxicity of Temik to grass shrimp. (U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency, Gulf Breeze La boratory; unpub lished study; CDL:096397-B)

102037 Shell Chemical Co . (1971) Toxicity Testing: Temik. (Unpublished study received Oct 26, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096397-C)

102038 Hudson, R.; Tucker, R.; Haegele, M. (1972) Eff ect of age on sensitivity: Acute oral toxicity of 14 pesticides to mallard ducks of several ages. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (22):556561. (Also In unpublished submissi on received Oct 26, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096397-E)

102047 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Aldicarb: Residues in Citrus. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 12, 1976 under 6F1829; CDL:096526-B)

102048 Lykins, H.; Meeker, R. (1971) Aldicarb Pesticide: Stability of Aldicarb in Water: Project No. 111A13, File No. 1 6060. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 10 16-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-C)

102049 Payne, L.; Stansbury, H.; Weiden, M. (1966) The synthesis and insecticidal properties of some cholinergic trisubstituted acetaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)o ximes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 14(4):356-36 5. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-D)

### Page 124 of 191 102050 Quraishi, M. (1972) Edaphic and water relati onships of aldicarb and its metabolites. Canadian Entomologist 104(Aug) :1191-1196. (Also In un published submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-E)

102051 Richey, F.; Moorefield, H. (1972) Temi k--Aldicarb Pesticide: Metabolism by Soils: Laboratory Studies: Project No . 111A12, File No. 17507. (Unp ublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-H)

102052 Richey, F.; Bartley, W.; Sheets, K. (1977) Laboratory studies on the degradation of (the pesticide) aldicarb in soils. Journal of Agricu ltural and Food Chemistry 25(1):47-51. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-I)

102053 Romine, R.; Meeker, R. (1973) Accumulation of Aldicarb Residues in Fish Tissue from Chronic Exposure to Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone in Aquaria Water: Project No. 111A13, File No . 19009. (Unpublished study recei ved Dec 6, 1977 under 1016- 69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-K)

102054 Sheets, K.; Hirsh, D.; Meeker, R. (1976) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Metabolism of Aldicarb in Anaerobic Muskingum Silt Loam Soil: Project No. 111A13, File No. 22196. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 und er 1016-69; submitted by Unio n Carbide Corp ., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-M)

102055 Skrentny, R.; Ellis, J. (1970) Control of Aphis fabae on broad beans (Vicia faba) by the systemic action of gamma-BHC, thionazin and aldicarb. Pestic. Sci. 1(Mar-Apr):45-48. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-N)

102056 Spengler, H.; Griffith, J.; Tamplin, W. ( 1968) Temik and Temik Metabolites: Vapor Pressure Data: Project No. 111A12, File No. 10819. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-O)

102057 Stephen, J.; Durden, J. (1969) A Study of the Decomposition of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone in Water at 100 (degrees): Project No. 111A28, File No. 11815. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 und er 1016-69; submitted by Unio n Carbide Corp ., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-Q)

102058 Supak, J. (1972) The Volatilization, degrada tion, adsorption, and desorption characteristics of aldicarb ... in soils and clays. Taken from: Dissertation Abstracts 33(3):982. (Order no. 72-24, 336; also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-R)

102059 Verstraete, W.; Voets, J. (1 9) Impact in sugarbeet crops of some important pesticide treatment systems on the microbial and enzymatic constitution of the soil. Source unknown p.1263- 1277. (Also In unpub lished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096670-S)

102060 Tobler, E.; Johnson, H. (1970) Temik--Aldicarb Pesticide: Thermal Decomposition and Baseand Acid-hydrolysis of Temik: Project No. 116A16, File No. 14185. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 10 16-69; submitted by Union Ca rbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-T)

102061 Woodham, D.; Edwards, R.; Reeves, R.; et al. (1973) Total toxic aldicarb residues in soil, cottonseed, and cotton lint following a soil treatment with the insecticide on the Texas high plains. J. Agr. Food Chem. 21 (2):303-307. (Also In unpublishe d submission received Dec 9, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096670-V)

### Page 125 of 191 102062 Khasawinah, A. (1977) Environmental Chemistry of Aldicarb. Summary of studies 091000- H, 091372-C, 091372-E, 091372-O, 091372-Q, 091373-F, 096671-B through 096671-I,
096671-M, 096671-P, 096671-R through 096671-Y. (Unp ublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-A)

102064 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1971) Fate and carryover properties of Temik aldicarb pesticide 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime in soil. Agricultural and Food Chemistry 19(4):727-73 0. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-C)

102065 Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in Aqueous Buffer Solutions: Project No. 111A13, File No. 22263. (U npublished study r eceived Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096671-D)

102066 Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Aldicarb Sulfoxide in Aqueous Buffer Solutions: Project No. 111A13, File No. 223226. (U npublished study recei ved Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-E)

102067 Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Photoche mical Transformation of Aldicarb: Project No. 111A13, File No. 22335. (Unpublished study received De c 6, 1977 under 10 16-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-F)

102068 Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Photostability of Aldicarb Sulfoxide: Project No. 111A13, File No. 22325. (Unpublished st udy received Dec 6, 1977 unde r 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-G)

102069 Borash, A.; Kramer, V.; M oorefield, H. ( 1973) Experiments Designed To Trace Movements of Aldicarb in Soil: Project No. 111B13, File No. 17959. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 101669; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 096671-H)

102070 Myers, R.; Weil, C.; Condra, N.; et al. (1975) Temik 10G BC (Coal); 10G and 15G (Gypsum); 15G (Corn Cob): Comparative Toxicity Studies via Peroral, Dermal, and Inhalation Routes: Special Report 38-141. (U npublished study receive d Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Institute of Research, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-M)

102071 Coppedge, J.; Bull, D.; Ridgeway, R. (1977) Movement and persistence of aldicarb in certain

soils. Archives of Environmental Contamina tion and Toxicology 5(2):129-141. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-P)

102072 Bartley, W.; Heywood, D. (1965) Metabolism Studies: Hydrolytic Stability of UC 21149: 855-31101-7073. (U npublished study received Dec 6, 19 77 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-R)

102073 Hirsh, D.; Sheets, K.; Holsing, G. (1977) Aldicarb Subsequent Crop Residues: File No. 23520. (Unpublished study received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-S)

102074 Hough, A.; Thomason, I; Farmer, W. (1975) Behavior of aldicarb in soil relative to control of Heterodera schachtii. Journal of Nematology 7(3):214-221. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 10 16-69; submitted by Union Ca rbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-T)

### Page 126 of 191 102075 Iwata, Y.; Westlake, W.; Barkley, J.; et al. (1977) Aldicarb residues in oranges, citrus byproducts, orange leaves, and soil after an aldi carb soil-application in an orange grove. J. Agric. Food Chem. 25(4):933-937. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-U)

102076 Jones, A. (1976) Metabolism of aldicarb by five soil fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 24(1):115- 117. (Also In unpublished subm ission received Dec 6, 1977 u nder 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-V)

102077 Kaufman, D. (1970) Pesticide metabolism. Pa ges 73-86, In Pesticides in the Soil: Ecology, Degradation and Movement: International Symposium on Pesticides in the Soil; Feb 25-27, 1970, East Lansing, MI. S.l.: s.n.. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-W)

102078 Kearby, W.; Ercegovich, C.; Bliss, M. (1970) Residue studies on aldi carb in soil and Scotch pine. Journal of Economic Entomology 63(4):1317-1318. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 10 16-69; submitted by Union Ca rbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-X)

102079 Leistra, M.; Sme lt, J.; Lexmond, T. (1976) Conversi on and leaching of aldicarb in soil columns. Pestic. Sci. 7:471-482. (Also In unp ublished submission received Dec 6, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096671-Y)

102086 Stier, E. (1971) Summary on Sensory Evaluation of Potato Samples. (Unpublished study received Dec 19, 1977 under 1016 -69; prepared by Rutgers Univ ., Dept. of Food Science, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096682-A)

102087 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Sensory Evaluation of Cigarettes Made from Tobacco Treated with Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study receive d Dec 19, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL:096682-C)

102088 Foremost Foods Co. (1977) Difference Testing--Kidney Beans: Control versus Temik Treated: Project No. 1387-RI(2) . (Unpublished study received D ec 19, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096682-E)

102089 Foremost Research Center (1977) Difference Testing: Fresh Tomatoes--Control versus Temik Treated; Tomato Juice--Control versus Temik Treated; Tomato Paste--Control Versus Temik Treated: Project No. 1387-RI(1) . (Unpublished study received D ec 19, 1977 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096682-F)

102090 Brasil, Secretaria da Agricultura (1977) Flav or Test in Coffee Treated with Temik 10G at the Rate of 60 Gr. of Formulation per Mat. (Coordenacao de Assistencia Tecnica Integral, Departamento de Assistencia Supletiv a; unpublished study; CDL:096682-G)

102091 Union Carbide Corp. (1978) Efficacy of Temik on or anges. (Unpublished study received Jan 17, 1978 under 1016-69; CDL: 096715-A)

102104 Atkins, E.; Kellum, D.; Atkins, K. (1977) Re pellent Additives to Reduce Pesticide Hazards to Honey Bees: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Bees as Pollinators of Agricultural Crops: Project No. 3565-RR (W-139). Fi nal rept. (Unpublished study received Jan 27, 1978 under 10182-17; prepared by Univ. of California-Riverside, Citrus Research Center and Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by ICI Americas, Inc., Wilmington, DE; CDL:096765-N)

### Page 127 of 191 102113 Union Carbid e Corp. (1977) Efficacy Studies of Aldicarb on Oranges. (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under 10 16-EX-34; CDL: 097217-A)

102114 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Fate of Aldicarb Residues (ppm) in Oranges under Commercial Processing: Complete Data from 3 Fractionation Lots: Report No. 1. (Unpublished study

received on unknown date under 1016-EX-34; CDL:097217-B)

102115 Johnson, D. (1976) Aldicarb Residues in Valencia Oranges: Report No. 2. (Unpublished study

received on unknown date under 1016-EX-34; submitted by Unio n Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:097217-C)

102116 Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Discussion of Performance: Temik. Summary of study 097272- B. (Unpublished study received Aug 14, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097272-A)

102117 Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Studies on the Efficacy of Sorghum Nematicides. (Compilation; unpublished study receive d Aug 14, 1978 under 101 6-78; CDL:097272-B)

102118 Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Residues of Aldicarb in Meat, Milk, and Other Subjects. (Unpublished study received Oct 19, 197 8 under 1016-EX-51; CDL:097628-B)

102119 Union Carbide Corp. (1978) Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received Oct 19, 1978 unde r 1016-EX-51; CDL:097628-C)

102120 Union Carbide Corp. (1977) Studies on the Efficacy of Temik on Grapes. (Compilation; unpublished study received Oct 19, 1978 under 1016-EX-51; CDL:097628-D)

102121 Union Carbide Corp. (1978) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used and Environmental Chemistry: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unp ublished study received Aug 14, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL:097271-C)

102122 Interregional Research Project No. 4. (1976) Nature of the Residue: (Aldicarb). (Unpublished study received Aug 10, 1977 un der 7E1996; CDL:097785-A)

102123 Interregional Resear ch Project No. 4. (1977) (Residue St udies for Aldicarb in or on Pecans). (Compilation; unpublished study received Au g 10, 1977 under 7E19 96; CDL:097785-U)

102127 Romanko, R. (1979) Aldicarb Insecticide for Control of Hop Pests. (Unpublished study received Feb 8, 1979 under 38338-EX-4; prep ared by Southwest Research & Extension Center, submitted by Univ. of Idaho, Twin Falls, ID; CDL:098220-A)

102128 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1977) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Apr 27, 1 979 under 9F2201; CDL:098223-A)

102129 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Residue Data for Aldicarb in Lemons, Limes and Grapefruit. (Unpub lished study received Apr 27, 1979 under 9F2201; CDL:098223-B)

102130 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Residue Data for Temik in Citrus Juices. (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 27, 1979 under 9F2201; CDL:098223- C)

102131 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Case of Tony Huerta, Allegedly Poisoned with Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 21, 1970 under 1016-69; CDL:100338-A)

### Page 128 of 191 102132 Fink, R.; Beavers, J.; Brown, R. (1979) Final Report: Eight-day Dietary LC50--Bobwhite Quail: Technical Grade Aldicarb: Project No. 142-118. (Unpublished st udy received Dec 12, 1979 under 1016-78; prepared by Wildlife International Ltd., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-B)

102133 Schneider, C. (1979) The Acute Toxicity of Aldicarb Technical to th e Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri Richardson): UCES Proj. No. 11504-14-03. (U npublished study received Dec 12, 1979 under 1016-78; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-C)

102134 Schneider, C. (1979) The Acute Toxicity of Aldicarb Technical to the Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque): UCES Proj. No. 11504-14-04. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1979 under 1 016-78; submitted by Union Carb ide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-D)

102135 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Discussion on Residues of Aldicarb Remaining in Plants and

Soil from Treatments of Temik 10G to Ornament al Plants. (Unpublished study received Jun 3, 1969 under 1016-69; CDL:101541-A)

102136 Union Carb ide Corp. (19) Mortality of Temik-dosed Mice. (Unp ublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin. no.; CDL:102776-A)

102137 Union Carbide Corp. (1971) Criteria Measured at 6-month Kill, or to Date, 5-26-71, on Twoyear Rat Feeding Study. (Unp ublished study received Jun 11, 1971 under unknown admin. no.; CDL: 102785-A)

102138 Bartley, W. (1965) Letter sent to R. Haines dated Nov 22, 1965 Summary of work in plant metabolism on Temik. (Unpublished study receive d Nov 26, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Tarrytown, NY; CDL:123009-A)

102139 Union Carbide Corp. (1964) Summary and Discussion of Results of Residue Analyses of Raw Agricultural Crops Treated with UC 21149, 1963-1964. (Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 1, 1966 under unknow n admin. no.; CDL:123032-B)

102140 Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Discussion of Performance Tests: UC 21149. (Compilation; unpublished study received Se p 9, 1965 under unknown ad min. no.; CDL:126441-A)

102141 Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Summary and Discussion of Results of Residue Analyses of Raw Agricultural Crops Treated with UC 21149, 1963-1964. (Compilation; unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under unknow n admin. no.; CDL:126443-B)

102142 Stansbury, H.; Johnson, D. (1964) Stability of ... (20047) and ... (21149) in Animal Diets: Status Report: Project No. 143B15. (Unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126443-C)

102143 Weil, C.; DeMary, L.; Soo, V. (1971) Co mparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of Temik 10GV, Temik 15GV and 5 Other Pesticide Formulations As Marketed: Special Report 34-76. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin. no.; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126446-A)

102144 Dernehl, C. (1972) Letter sent to R. Back dated Apr 28, 1972 Toxicity of Temik 10G in humans. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under unknown admin. no.; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126446-B)

102145 Borash, A.; Bryant, H. (1965) Test Report on Union Carbide Agricultural Products: (Toxicity to Goldfish). (Unpublished st udy received Sep 9, 1965 unde r 1016-EX-24; CD L:126467-A)

### Page 129 of 191 102146 Lovell, C.; Quick, Q. (1967) Temik Insecticide: Determination of Temik by Infrared Spectroscopy: Project No. 111A25, File No. 7135. (Unpublished study received May 8, 1967 under 1016EX-22; submitted by Union Carbid e Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126474-A)

102147 McDermott, W.; Quick, Q. (1966) Insectic ide Temik: Determination of Acetone in Temik 10G and Ambush 2G: Project No . 299A20, File No. 6549. (U npublished study received Feb 6, 1967 under 1016EX-22; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126474- C)

102148 Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Results of Tests Conducted by and under the Supervision of Federal and State Agencies with UC 21149 Form ulations on Ornamental Plant Pest Control-- 1962-1964. (Unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under 1016-EX- 22; CDL: 126475-A)

102149 Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Summary of Selected Performance of UC 21149 on Various Pests on Cotton and Potatoes--1964-1965. (U npublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; CDL: 126479-A)

102150 Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Petition Propo sing Temporary Tolerance for Residue of UC 21149 on and in Cottonseed and Potatoes. (U npublished study received Feb 1, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; CDL: 126480-A)

102151 Union Carbid e Corp. (1965) Efficacy Studies of Carbamate Insectic ides on Cotton. (Compilation; unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX- 24; CDL:126481-B)

102152 Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Accidental Poisoning Report: Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; CD L:126483-A)

102153 Stansbury, H. (1966) Letter sent to G. Downard dated Oct 3, 1966: Temik 10G. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1966 un der 1016EX-24; submitted by Unio n Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 126483-B)

102154 Union Carbide Co rp. (1965) Efficacy Studies of Insectic ides on Various Crops. (Compilation; unpublished study received Sep 9, 1965 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126484-B)

102155 Ketcham, N. (1966) Analyses of Urine Specimens for Metabolite of UC21149: Project No. 299A20, File No. 5882 . (Unpublished study received Ju l 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126494-A)

102156 Stansbury, H.; Wright, M. (1966) Area III--A gricultural Products Insecticide Temik: Standard Samples for Residue Analyses : 855-31106-7965 . (Unpublished study r eceived Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126494-B)

102157 Romine, R. (1966) Summary and Discussion: Temik. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 1966 under 1016-EX-24; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126496-B)

102158 Union Carbide Corp. (1966) Determination of Temik Sulfoxide in Human Urine. (Unpublished study received Jul 26, 196 6 under 1016-EX-24; CDL:126496-C)

102159 Anderson, H. (1969) Letter sent to J. Harry dated May 21, 1969: Livestock poisoning involving Temik 10G. (Unpublis hed study received May 28, 1969 under 1016-EX-30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126507-A)

### Page 130 of 191 102160 United States of America Standards Institute (1969) Common Name for the Pest Control Chemical ... Aldicarb. New York, NY: USASI. (USAS K62.77-168; also In unpublished submission received Jul 14, 1969 under 1016-EX-30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:126507-B)

102161 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Efficacy Study of Temik on Plants. (Compilation; unpublished study received Mar 11, 1969 unde r 1016-EX-30; CDL:126507-C)

102162 Union Carbide Corp. (19) Metabolic Pathway of Temik in Animals and Acute Toxicity of Metabolites. (Unpublished study received on unknown date u nder 1016-EX-24; CDL:127018- A)

102163 Haines, R. (1968) Temik 10G Experimental Systemic Pesticide: F40977E. (Unpublished study received May 1, 1968 un der unknown admin. no.; subm itted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:130982-A)

102164 Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Summary and Discussion of Results of Residue Analyses of Raw Agricultural Crops Treated with UC 21149, 19 63-1964. (Unpublished study received Sep 8, 1965 under unknown admin. no.; CDL:130984-A)

102165 Union Carbide Corp. (1964) UC 21149 Acaricide/Insecticide/Nematocide: F-40977A. (Unpublished study received Mar 1, 1964 un der unknown admin. no .; CDL:131906-A)

102166 Union Carbide Corp. (1965) UC 21149--Experimental Nematocide/Acaricide/Insecticide: F40977B. (Unpublished study received Feb 1, 19 65 under unknown admin. no.; CDL:131907- A)

102167 Union Carbide Corp. (1968) Temik 10G Insecticide: Field Evaluation of Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. (Unpublished study received Dec 5, 19 68 under 1016-EX-30; CDL:131937- A)

102169 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Handling and Safety Guide for Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. S.l.: UCC. (Also In unpublished submissi on received May 18, 1970 under 1016-69; CDL:220187-A)

102170 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Information for Physicians on Therapy of Poisoning by Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. (Unpublished stu dy received May 18, 1970 under 1016-69; CDL:220187-B)

102171 Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Efficacy of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-78; CDL:223960-A)

102172 Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Aldicarb Re sidues in Potatoes Treated with Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received on u nknown date under 1016-78; CDL:223960-B)

102173 Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Efficacy of Temik Com pounds on Oranges, Cotton and Other Crops for Control of Various Pe sts. (Compilation; unpublishe d study received Feb 15, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL:228048-A)

102174 Iwata, Y. (19) Residue Study of Aldicarb in New Growth Orange Leaves. (Unpublished study received Feb 15, 1977 under 1016 69; prepared by Univ. of Ca lifornia--Riverside, Dept. of Entomology, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL: 228048-B)

102177 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69; CDL: 232221-A)

### Page 131 of 191 102178 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1970) Metabolism and Associated Residues of Temik (2-Methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl)-oxime) in Sugar Beet Plants: Project No. 111B19, File No. 12694. (U npublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:232221-K)

102179 Andrawes, N.; Moorefield, H. (1972) Metabolism and Terminal Residues of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in Flue Cured Tobacco: Project No. 111A12, File No. 17805. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 under 1016-69; submitte d by Union Carbide Co rp., Arlington, VA; CDL:232221-M)

102180 Khasawinah, A.; Hirsh, D. ; Meeker, R. (1976) Temik Aldi carb Pesticide: Metabolism of

Aldicarb in Green and Cured To bacco and Pyrolysis Products in Smoke: Project No. 111A13, File No. 21978. (Unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 un der 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:232221-N)

102181 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Magnitude of the Residue: Aldicarb Studies on Tobacco. (Compilation; unpublished study received Sep 21, 1976 unde r 1016-69; CDL:232221-O)

102188 Supak, J. (1972) The Volatilization, Degrad ation, Adsorption, and Desorption Characteristics of Aldicarb 2-Methyl-2-(methylthio) Propionaldehyde O-(Methylcarbamoyl) Oxime in Soils and Clays. (Dissertation; unp ublished study received Oct 23, 1978 under 1016-78; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlin gton, VA; CDL: 235942-A)

102189 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1979) Alleged Temik Human Over-exposure Cases Reported in the U.S. (November 1976-July 1979). Summary of studies 238958-C through 238958-F . (Unpublished study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264-322; CDL: 238958- A)

102190 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1977) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record- -Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; un published study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-B)

102191 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; un published study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-C)

102192 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1978) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; un published study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-D)

102193 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1979) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; un published study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-E)

102194 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1979) Pesticide Incident Investigation Record: Temik Aldicarb Pesticide. (Compilation; un published study received Aug 16, 1979 under 264322; CDL:238958-F)

102195 Moorefield, H. (1979) Aldicarb Pesticide: Mechanism of Action and Therapy: Studies on Cholinesterase Inhibition by Aldicarb Pesticid e. Summary of studies 050847-A, 096131-P, 235615-C, 241454-B through 241454-F, 241454-H, 241454-J through 241454-N and 241454- P through 241454-S. (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-A)

### Page 132 of 191 102196 Weiden, M. (1968) Insecticidal carbamoyloxime s. J. Sci. Fd Agric., Suppl. P19-31. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc ., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-B)

102197 Yu, C.; Kearns, C.; Metcalf, R. (1972) Acet ylcholinesterase inhibition by substituted phenyl N-alkyl carbamates. J. Agr. Fd. Chem. 20(3):537-540. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979 under 2 64-322; submitted by Union Carbid e Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-C)

102198 Hastings, F.; Main, A.; Iverson, F. (1970) Carbamylation and affinity constants of some carbamate inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase and their relation to analogous substrate constants. J. Agr. Food Chem . 18(3):497-502. (Also In unpub lished submission received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-D)

102199 Reiner, E. (1971 ) Spontaneous reactivation of ph osphorylated and carbamylated cholinesterases. Bull Wld Hlth Org. 44:109-112. (Published study; CDL:241454-E)

102200 Reiner, E.; Simeon-Rudolf, V. (1966) The kine tics of inhibition of erythrocyte cholinesterase by monomethylcarbamates. Biochem. J. 98:501-505. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979 under 2 64-322; submitted by Union Carbid e Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-F)

102201 Chin, B. ; Sullivan, L. (19) (Temik: Toxicity to Dogs). (Unpub lished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-H)

102202 Weil, C. (19) (Tox icity of Aldicarb Pesticides to Rats ). (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-J)

102203 Johnson, H.; Sullivan, L.; McGee, M. (1968) Temik (UC 21149): Antidotal Therapy in Rats following Administration of Multiple Lethal Doses: Special Report 31-146. (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 u nder 264-322; prep ared by Mellon Institu te, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-M)

102204 Gordon, J.; Leadbeater, L.; Maidment, M. (1978) The protection of animals against organophosphate poisoning by pretreatment with a carbamate. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 43:207-216. (Also In unpublished submission received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-P)

102206 Goldberg, M.; Johnson, H. (1962) Pharmacodynamic Effects of Cmpd. 21149. (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepar ed by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-R)

102207 Striegel, J.; Condra, N.; Haun, C.; et al. (1962) Pharmacodynami c Effects: (Compound 21149): Report 25-53. (Unpublished study received Dec 11, 1979 under 264-322; prepared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Ag ricultural Products Co., Inc., Ambler, PA; CDL:241454-S)

104551 Abdalla, N. (1977) Letter sent to F. Sanders dated Dec 5, 1977 Environmental chemistry of Temik. Summary of study 096732 -B. (Unpublished study receive d Jan 25, 1978 under 1016- 79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-A)

### Page 133 of 191 104552 Khasawinah, A. (1977) Environmental Chemistry of Aldicarb. Summary of studies 096732-C through 096732-AW. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-B)

104553 Union Carbide Corp. (19) Determination of Total Toxic Temik Residues in Sugar Beet Fractions by Gas Chromatogra phy: UC 21149-III-SBF. (Unpub lished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; CDL:096732-C)

104555 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W.; Herrett, R. (1971) Fate and carryover properties of Temik aldicarb pesticide ... in soil. Agricultural and Food Chemistry 19(4):727-730. (Also In unpublished submission received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-E)

104556 Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in Aqueous Buffer

Solutions: File No. 22263. (Unpublished study received Ja n 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-F)

104557 Andrawes, N.; Meeker, R. (1976) Hydrolysis of Aldicarb Sulfoxide in Aqueous Buffer

Solutions: File No. 22326. (Unpublished study received Ja n 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-G) 104558 Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R.; et al. (1968) Field Evaluation of the Persistence and Movement of Temik and Its Carbamates in Soil: File No. 10485. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-P)

104559 Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B.; Romine, R.; et al. (1968) Field Evaluation of the Persistence of

Temik and Its Carbamate Metabolites in Pond Wa ter and Their Effect on Pond Fauna: File No. 10491. (Unpublished study received Jan 25 , 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Res earch Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-Q)

104560 Kaufman, D. (19) Pesticide metabolism. Pa ges 73-86, In Pesticides in the Soil: Ecology, Degradation and Movement. By S.l.: s.n.. (Als o In unpublished submi ssion received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-Y)

104561 Lin, S.; Funke, B.; Schulz, J. (1972) Effects of some organophosphate and carbamate insecticides on nitrification and legume gr owth. Plant and Soil 37(3):489-496. (Also In unpublished submission received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submit ted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AB)

104562 Lykins, H. (1969) The Effect of Temper ature and pH on the Stability of Temik, Temik

Sulfoxide and Temik Sulfone in Water. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AC)

104563 Lykins, H.; Meeker, R. (1971) Stability of Aldicarb in Water: File No. 16060. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 un der 1016-79; submitted by Unio n Carbide Corp ., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AD)

104564 Quraishi, M. (1972) Edaphic and water relati onships of aldicarb and its metabolites. Canadian Entomologist 104(3): 1191-1196. (Also In unpublished s ubmission received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AF)

### Page 134 of 191 104565 Richey, F.; Bartley, W.; Singh, R. (1972) Water Leaching of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, Aldicarb Sulfone and Internal Standard Chloride Ion in Columns of Four Soil Types: File No. 16669. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangl e Park, NC; CDL: 096732-AG)

104566 Richey, F.; Moorefield, H. (1972) Upward Movement of Aldicarb through Soil during Water Evaporation: File No. 17526 . (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-AH)

104567 Romine, R.; Meeker, R.; Roever, K.; et al. (1972) Leaching of Aldicar b into Sand y Soil with Irrigation of a Temik Treated Sugar Beet Field: File No. 17079. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AK)

104568 Romine, R.; Meeker, R.; Gibs on, C.; et al. (1973) Accumulatio n of Aldicarb Residues in Fish Tissue from Chronic Exposure to Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone in Aquaria Water: File No. 19009 . (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AL)

104569 Romine, R.; Halstead, C.; Gibson, C.; et al. (1968) Leaching Character istics of Temik 10G in Soils: File No. 10902. (Unpublished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 096732-AN)

104570 Sheets, K.; Hirsh, D.; Meeker, R. (1976) Metabolism of Aldicarb in Anaerobic Muskingum

Silt Loam Soil: File No. 22196. (Unpublished study receive d Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AO)

104571 Skrentny, R.; Ellis, J. (1970) Control of Aphi s fabae on broad beans ... by the systemic action of gamma-BHC, thionazin and aldicarb. Pestic. Sci. 1(Mar/Apr):45-48. (Also In unpublished submission received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AP)

104572 Tobler, E.; Johnson, H. (1970) Thermal Decomposition an d Baseand Acid-hydrolysis of Temik: File No. 14185. (Unpub lished study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Tr iangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-AV)

105062 Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (1980) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpublished study received Jun 15, 1982 under 264-318; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:247685-A)

107125 Flanagin, R. (1977) Third Quarterly Report on Temik 15G. (Unpublished study received on unknown date under 1016-EX-34; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:237152-A)

107395 Vilkas, A. (1977) The Acute Toxicity of Al dicarb Technical to the Wa ter Flea ...: UCES Proj. #11504-14-01. (Unp ublished study received Dec 19, 1977 under 10 16-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:096683-A)

107397 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received Aug 14, 1978 under 1016-78; CDL: 097271-B)

107398 Fink, R.; Beavers, J.; Brown, R. (1979) Final Report: Acute Oral LD50--Mallard Duck: Technical Grade Aldicarb: Proj ect No. 142119. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1979 under 1016-78; prepared by Wildlife Internati onal, Ltd., submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, VA; CDL:099120-A)

### Page 135 of 191 107399 Hall, K.; Le-minh, N. (1976) Shelf-stability of 2 Lb/US Gal Permethrin EC: Report Series TMU0191/76A. (Unpublished study received Dec 2, 1976 under 10182-EX-3; submitted by ICI Americas, Inc., Wilmi ngton, DE; CDL:229013-B)

110506 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1982) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used: Aldicarb. (Compilation; unpublished study received May 4, 1982 under 2F2679 ; CDL: 070835-A)

110512 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1 981) (Temik Efficacy Support Data and Residue Documentation for Use in Soybean Protection from Nematodes). (Compilation; unpublished study received Apr 19, 1982 u nder IL 82/4; CDL:247347-A)

111923 Union Carbide Corp. (1976) Nature of the Residue: Aldicarb. (Unpublished study received May 6, 1977 under 1016-69; CDL: 096131-A)

114335 Coate, W.; Mense, M.; Hardy, R.; et al. (1982) Subacute Inhalation Toxicity Study of a Pesticide Residue in Dogs: T3,T6, and to Type Cigarettes: Project No. 400-636. Final rept. (Unpublished study received Sep 3, 1982 under 264-330; prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc., submitted by Union Carbide Agri cultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 248307-A)

115237 Mayberry, R.; Savage, J. (1978) Mutagenic activ ity of several pesticides using the salmonella test and saccharomyces D3 system. Taken from: Am. Soc. Microbiol, Abstracts on the Annual Meeting. S.l.: s.n.. (Abstract H 126; p. 125; also In unpublished submission received Oct 1, 1982 under 432-482; submitted by Penick Corp., Lyndhurst, NJ; CDL:248482-B)

115301 Hill, E.; Camardese, M. (1981) Subacute t oxicity testing with young birds: Response in relation to age and interest variability of LC50 estimates. Avian and Mammalian Wildlife Toxicology 2:41-65. (Also In unpublished submission received Oct 7, 1982 un der 201-142; submitted by Shell Chemical Co., Washington, DC; CDL:248514-U)

115963 Bartley, W.; Heywood, D. (1965) Insecticide 21149: Metabolism Studies, Hydrolytic Stability of UC 21149: UCC Status Repo rt 855-31101-7073. (Unpublishe d study received Jan 25, 1978 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:096732-T)

117840 Johansen, C.; Eves, J. (1967) Bee Research Investigations, 1967. (Unpublished study received Oct 13, 1969 under 0F0897; prepared by Washington State Univ., submitted by Fisons Corp., Wilmington, MA; CDL:091551-H)

122315 Fisons, Inc. (1977) Bendiocarb: Occupational Safety Information. (Unpublished study received Sep 9, 1977 under unknow n admin. no.; CDL:231544-B)

124047 Union Carbide Corp. (1975) Effectiveness Data: Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received Oct 1, 1975 unde r 6G1689; CDL:095061-A)

126065 Wilkinson, C.; Babish, J.; Lemley, A.; et al. (1983) A Toxicological Evaluation of Aldicarb and Its Metabolites in Relation to the Potential Human Health Impact of Aldicarb Residues in Long Island Ground Water. (Unpublished st udy received Jan 26, 1 983 under 264-330; prepared in cooperation with FMC Corp. and others, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:249416-A)

126500 Union Carbide Corp. (1973) Human Monitoring Study of Field Application of Temik 15G. (Unpublished study received Apr 9, 19 74 under 1016-EX-31 ; CDL:249763-A)

### Page 136 of 191 126688 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Effectivness Data: Temik. (Compilation; unpublished study received Feb 25, 1983 unde r 264-330; CDL:071499-A)

127874 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Environmental Data: Aldicarb Pesticide: Soil and Water. (Com pilation; unpublished study r eceived Apr 15, 1983 under 264- 330; CDL:250012-A)

128132 Weil, C.; DeMary, L.; Soo, V. (1971) Co mparative Skin Penetration Toxicity of Temik 10GV, Temik 15GV and 5 Other Pesticide Formulations as Marketed: Special Report 34-76. (Unpublished study received Oct 27, 1971 unde r 1016-EX-31; prepared by CarnegieMellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:249766-A)

129300 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used: (Aldoxycarb in or on Vegetable Crops). (Compilation; unpub lished study received May 17, 1983 under 264- 401; CDL:071609-E)

129660 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1983) Environmental Effects of Temik and Aldicarb. (Compilation; unp ublished study received Aug 2, 1983 under 264-330; CDL:250888-A)

129661 Oshima, R.; Torres, G.; Nelson, S.; et al. (1980) Monitoring Selected Ground Water Basins for the Presence of Aldicarb: A Cooperative California Interagency Study. (Unpublished study received Aug 2, 1983 under 264-330; pr epared by California Dept. of Food and Agriculture and Others, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:250888-B)

129662 Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (1980) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpu blished study received Aug 2, 19 83 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:250888-C)

131661 Schardein, J.; Leng, J. (1983) Teratology Study in Rabbits: Aldicarb: 369-107. (Unpublished study received Oct 18, 1983 under 264-330; pr epared by International Research and Development Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251510-A)

132500 Jones, R. (1982) Letter sent to J. Lovell dated Nov 16, 1982: Data on movement of aldicarb in soil--impact of irriga tion. (Unpublished study received Nov 18, 1982 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:248850-A)

132501 Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (19) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpublished study received Nov 18, 1982 unde r 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Re search Triangle Park, NC; CDL:248851-A)

132647 Weil, C. (1971) Miscellaneous Toxicity Studies: (Sevin and Other Compounds on Rats): Special Report 34-71. (Unpublished study received Nov 3, 1983 under 264-324; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Re search Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251719-G)

132668 Schardein, J.; Leng, J.; Aldridge, D.; et al. (1983) Teratology Study in Rabbits: Aldicarb: 369- 107. (Unpublished study receive d Oct 19, 1983 under 264-330; prepared by International Research and Development Corp., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251731-A)

### Page 137 of 191 132989 Ashton, A.; Jackson, W. (1983) Letter sent to Union Carbide dated Nov 18, 1983: Temik field trial (Michigan): Effects on wildlife. (Unpublished study received Dec 13, 1983 under 264- 330; prepared by Bowling Green State Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251947-A)

133377 Enfield, C.; Carsel, R.; Cohen, S.; et al. (1980) Methods of Approximating Transport of Organic Pollutants to Groundwater. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1983 under 100- 617; prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, NC; CDL: 072211-N)

133485 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1983) Tile-drained Corn: 1983 Studies Conducted in Michigan and Indiana. (Unpublished study received Dec 13 , 1983 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Re search Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251946-A)

133499 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1983) Temik and Standak Tobacco Field Studies: 0352G. (Unpublished study received Dec 13, 1983 under 264318; subm itted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:251971-A)

134490 Hays, H.W.; Drill, V.A.; Friess, S.L.; et al . (1980) Temik^(R)I Aldicarb Pesticide Review of Toxicological Data and Determination of Acceptable Daily Intake. (Unpublished study received Sep 26, 1980 u nder unknown admin. no.; prepared by Drill, Friess, Hays, Loomis and Shaffer, Inc. and Johns Hopkins Univ., submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., Wilmington, Del.; CDL:243334-A)

135030 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1976) The Name, Chemical Identity and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical: Aldicarb in Dry Beans and Soybeans. (Compilation; unpublished study receive d Aug 10, 1976 under 6F 1849; CDL:096405-A)

135031 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1976) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the Analytical Method Used: Aldicarb in Dry Beans and Soybeans. (Compilati on; unpublished study received Aug 10, 1976 under 6F1849; CDL:096405-B)

135437 Romine, R. (1979) Letter sent to J. Lovelli; P. Schroeder dated Jul 11, 1979 Methodology for determination of residues: Standak. (Unpublished study received Jul 18, 1979 under 1016-79; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL: 098391-C)

135901 Union Carbide Corp. (1970) Efficacy of Temik 10G Pe sticide. (Compilation; unpublished study received Dec 16, 1970 u nder 1016-69; CDL:005150-A)

135902 Haines, R. (1972) Letter sent to J. Touhey dated Mar 4, 1972: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide: Amend to combine cotton and sugar beet direc tions for use. (Unpublished study received Mar 3, 1972 under 1016-69; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:005152-A)

136597 Carpenter, C.; Condra, N.; Humes, C.; et al. (1966) Temik 10G (10.5% Granular Formulation of Compound 21149): 15-Day Dermal Applications to Rabbits: Report 29-80. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1966 un der 1016-69; prep ared by Mellon Institute, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Res earch Triangle Park, NC; CDL:005580-A)

137875 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1980) Residue: Aldicarb in Water. (Compilation; unpublished study received Ap r 13, 1984 under 264-33 0; CDL:252965-A)

### Page 138 of 191 137876 Hansen, J.; Romine, R.; Jones, R. (1984) Long-term Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. (Unpublished study received Apr 13, 1984 under 264-330; submitted by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., In c., Research Triangle Park, NC; CDL:252966- A)

138037 Union Carbide Corporation (1964) UC 21149--Experimental Nematocide/

Acaricide/Insecticide: F-40977B. (Unpublishe d study received Jul 26 , 1966 under 6G0473; CDL:090526-A)

139863 Clarkson, V.A.; Hensley, W.H. (1968) Temik Insecticide: Toxicity of Temik, Temik Sulfoxide, and Temik Sulfone Bluegill Sunfish. Project No. 111B32. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 u nder 1016-EX-37; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:238153-C)

139865 Kinkead, E.R.; Chin, B.H.; Weil, C.S.; et al. (1968) Toxicity Studies on Temik: (2-Methyl-2- methylthiopropionaldehyde-N-methylcarbamoyloxime) and Related Carbamates: Special Report 31-48. (Unpublished study received Jan 18, 1977 under 1016-EX-37; prepared by Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Mellon Institute, Chemical Hygiene Fellowship, submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL:238153-I)

140001 Romine, R.R. (1976) Letter sent to R.S. Flanagin dated Jan 16, 1976: Citurs fractionation. (Unpublished study recei ved Oct 10, 1975 under 6G1689; s ubmitted by Union Carbide Corp., Washington, D.C.; CDL:096440-A)

140367 Back, R.C. (1970) Letter sent to Harold G. Alford dated Mar 2, 1970: Temik 10G aldicarb pesticide--Third and final pe riodic report. (Unpublished study received Mar 3, 1970 under 1016-EX30; submitted by Union Carbide Corp., Arlington, Va.; CDL: 126506-A)

140487 Interregional Research Proj ect No. 4 (1977) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, Including a Description of the An alytical Method Used : Aldicarb in Pecans. (Compilation; unpublished study received Aug 10, 1977 under 7E1996 ; CDL: 097371-A)

142079 Cimino, M.; Galloway, S.; Ivett, J. (1984) Mutagenicity Evaluation of Aldicarb Technical 93.47% in the Mouse bone marrow cytogentic Assay: Final Report: Project No. 22202. Unpublished study prepared by Litton Bionetics, Inc. 21 p.

142080 Sansebastian, J. (1984) CHO Metaphase Anal ysis In Vitro Chromosome Aberration Analysis in Chinese Hamster ovary cells: Aldoxycarb Technical: Study No. PH 320-UC-005-83. Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Research International, Inc. 33 p.

142081 Godek, E. (1984) Rat Hepatocyte Primary Culture/DNA Repair Test: Aldicarb Technical: Study No. PH 311-UC-005-83. Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Research International, Inc. 48 p.

142082 Dejonckheere, W. (19) Leaching in Soil and Uptake Bij Sugarbeets of Aldicarb and Thiofanox. Unpublished study prepared by state Uni. Of Gent (Belgium). 25 p.

142083 Hirsh, D.; Sheets, K. (1977) Aldicarb Subsequent Crop Residues: Project No. 812C20. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 12 p.

142084 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Monitoring of Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb Residues on North Carolina and Virginia Tobacco Fields: VO352g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 23 p.

### Page 139 of 191142085 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Monitoring of Aldicarb Residues in Michigan and Indiana Tiledrained corn Fields: 0332g/015g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 19 p.

142086 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Degradation and movement of Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb Residues in Arizona cotton: V4639. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 17 p.

142088 Romine, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Aldicarb Oxidation Mechanism Studies: 0596g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 13 p.

142089 Romine, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone Groundwater Degradation Mechanism Studies: V4654. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 11 p.

142090 Bussain, R. (1984) (Temik Residues in Soil). Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agr. Prod. Co., Inc. 24 p.

142091 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) (Temik Residues in Water). Unpublished study. 41 p.

142092 Jones, R.; Rourke, R.; Hansen, J. (1984) Effect of Application Methods on Movement and Degradation of Aldicarb Residues in Maine Potato Fields: 0436g. Unpublished study. 28 p.

142093 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Degradation And Transport of Aldoxycarb Residues in Southern Florida: V4637. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 14 p.

142094 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) (Temik Residues in Soil): 0400g. Unpublished compilation. 10 p.

142095 Poter, K.; Lemley, A.; Hughes, H.; et al. (1984) Developing Information. On Aldicarb Levels in Long Island Groundwater: 0483g. Unpublished study prepared by Cornell University and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 40 p.

142096 Hughes, H.; Trautmann, N.; Porter, K. (1984) Tracking Aldicarb Residues in Long Island Ground Water: Interim Results. Unpublished st udy prepared by Cornell University. 32 p.

144970 Jackson, W. (1984) Letter sent to T. DeWitt dated June 21, 1984: [A Field study to evaluate

the hazard to birds in Corn Fiel ds treated with Temik. 6 p.

144971 Supak, J.; Swoboda, A.; Dixon, J. (1977) Volatilization and Degration Losses of Aldicarb From Soil. J. Environ. Qual. 6(4):413417.

145704 Union Carbide Corporation (1979)[Efficacy Data Temi k 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide]. Unpublished compilation. 291 p.

147055 Eisler, M. (1966) Adaptation of the Liver to Heptachlor and Its Epoxide. Unpublished study prepared by Velsicol Chemical Corporation. 6 p.

148168 Stankowski, L. (1985) CHO/HGPRT Mammalian Cell Forward Mutation Assay: Aldicarb: PH 314-UC-003-84. Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Research International, Inc. 35 p.

### Page 140 of 191 148685 Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Eichler, A. (1977) Temik 10G--Gypsum Formulation (Blue): Wildlife Surveys following Application to Four Sugar Beet and Four Potato Fields: UNC 57/774581. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 255 p.

148686 Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1978) A Comparison of the Palatability to the Ringnecked Pheasant of Three Form ulations of Temik 10 G with Other Granular Pesticides: UNC/69C/78938. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 23 p.

148687 Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1978) A Comparison of the Palatability to the Zebra Finch of Two Formulations of Temik: UNC 69 G/78398. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 16 p.

148688 Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1978) A Comparison of the Palatability to the Ringnecked Pheasant of Two Formulations of Temik: UNC 69 G/78399. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 14 p.

148689 Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1979) The Effect of Granule Size on the Toxic Hazard to Passeriformes of Temik 10G: UNC 69B/ 78721. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 16 p.

148690 Stickel, W. (1979) Letter sent to R. Back dated May 29, 1979: [Comments on "Report on palatability studies and trials regarding the acute toxicity of the plant protection products Temik 10 G and Temik 10 GGF (gypsum) with Japanese quails, chickens and sparrows"]. Prepared by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. 3 p.

148691 Tait, F. (1972) Aldicarb: Wild Life Survey 1972. Unpublished study prepared by DupharMidox Ltd. 28 p.

148692 United Kingdom, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, Pest Infestation Control Laboratory (1974) A Study of the Effects of Aldicarb or Wildlife. Unpublished study. 65 p.

148693 Brown, P.; Bunyan, P.; Stanley, P.; et al. (1975) Field Surveillance of the Possible Wildlife

Hazards Associated with the Use of the Nematic ide, Aldicarb: Chemistry Department Report No. 17. Unpublished study prepared by U.K. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pest Infestation Control Laboratory. 57 p.

148694 Spencer, D. (1985) A Review of the Research Conducted on the Toxicity and Potential

Hazard of Granular Formulations of Aldicarb (Temik) to Bird Li fe. Unpublished study. 32 p.

148695 Balcomb, R.; Stevens, R.; Bowen, C. (1984) Toxicity of 16 granular insecticides to wildcaught songbirds. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 33:302-307.

148696 Back, R. (1968) Temik 10 G Granular Pesticide: Field Ev aluation of Potential Hazard to Bobwhite Quail. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 15 p.

148697 Benjamini, L. (1981) The efficacy of seed treatment with aldicarb to es tablish conditioned aversion in birds to sprouting sugar beets. Phytoparasitica 9(1):3-9.

148698 Benjamini, L. (1981) Testing aldicarb as a bi rd repellent in a sprou ting sugar beet field. Phytoparasitica 9(2):89-94.

148699 Clarkson, V.; Rowe, B. (1970) Temik Insecticide: Field Evaluations of the Toxic Hazard of Temik Formulations 10G, 10GV, 10GC and 10GVB4 to Bobwhite Quail: Project No. 111B32: File No. 12676. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 15 p.

### Page 141 of 191 148700 Haines, R. (1970) Temik 10G Granular Pestic ide: Field Evaluations of Potential Hazard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ring-necked Pheasants in Sugar Beet Plantings: Trial III. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 8 p.

148701 Haines, R. (1 971) Continued Field Evaluations on the Potential H azard of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Valley Quail and Ringnecked Pheasants in a Cotton Planting. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 7 p.

148702 Haines, R. (1 971) Continued Field Evaluations on the Potential Hazar ds of Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Bob White Quail in Cotton Plantings. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Corp. 7 p.

148703 Hill, E.; Camardese, M. (198 4) Toxicity of anticholinesterase insecticides to birds: Technical grade versus granular formulations. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 8:551-563.

148704 Hilbig, V.; Westphal, D.; Lucas, K.; et al. (1979) Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Vogeltoxizitaet mit Zwei Granulatformulierungen des Nematizides Temik [Comparative Studies of the Toxicity to Birds of Two Granulated Formulations of Temik Nematocides]: Vetmed-Berichte 2/1979. Unpublished study prepared by Institute of Veterinary Medicine. 24

p.

148705 Lund, R. (1970) Su mmary of Field Observations: Pote ntial Hazard of Te mik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide to Ring-necked Pheasant ... from Simulated Spills. Unpublished study prepared by State of New Jersey, Dept. of Conservation and Economic Development, Black River Wildlife Management Area. 2 p.

148706 Medd, R.; Roberts, N. (1 972) Palatability and A cceptability of Temik (Corn Cob and Coal Formulations) to the Pheasant and the Pigeon: 5419/72/815. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 31 p.

148707 Medd, R.; Burrows, I.; Roberts, N.; et al. (1 972) The Determination of the Single Dose Oral LD50 (24 Hour Value) and Residual Levels of Temik (Coal) in the Pheasant: Amended: 5355/72/751. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 28 p.

148708 Relton, J. (1970) Wild Life Survey: Temik 10G Aldicarb Pesticide on Sugar Beets: Suffolk, England, 1970. Unpublished study. 11 p.

148709 Ross, D.; Roberts, N.; Cameron, D. (1977) A Comparison of the Acute Oral Toxicity (LD50) of Three Formulations of Temik to the Japanese Quail: UNC 68 W/771042. Unpublished study prepared by Huntingdon Research Centre. 12 p.

148963 Jones, R.; Rourke, R.; Hansen, J. (1985) Effect of Application Methods on Movement and Degradation of Aldicarb Residues in Maine Potato Fields:0830g. Unpublished study prepared by the University of Maine in cooperation with Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 30 p.

148964 Jones, R.; Hansen, J.; Romine, R. (1984) Unsaturated Zone Studies on the Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb Residues: Preliminary Draft:0702g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 69 p.

148965 Jones, R. (1985) Field, Laboratory, and Modeling Studies on the Degradation and Transport of Aldicarb Residue in Soil and Groundwater:0886g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. 19 p.

### Page 142 of 191 148966 Hansen, J.; Romine, R.; Jones, R. (1984) Long-term Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone:Draft: 0167g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 20 p.

148967 Romine, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Aldicarb Oxidation Mechanism Studies:Preliminary Draft:0596g. Unpublished study prepared by Un ion Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. 13 p.

148968 Jones, R.; Hansen, J. (1984) Central California Studies on the Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb Residues:Preliminary Draft: 0729g. Unpu blished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 29 p.

148969 Otten, R. (1985) Letter sent to J. Lovell dated April 18, 1985: [Two Week Dose Rangefinding Study in Beagle Dogs with Aldicarb Technical]: Project NO. 400-705. Prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. 9 p.

148970 Wisconsin Association of Manufacturers and Commerce (1985) A Review and Critique of Proposed Groundwater Standards under NR140 as Submitted by the Wisconsin Department of

Health and Social Services. Unpublished study. 81 p.

148971 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. (1985) New Registration Data Submitted for Aldicarb Special Review: Residue [Grapefruit]. Unpublished study. 5 p.

149696 Johansen, C.; Mayer, D.; Eves, J.; et al. ( 1983) Pesticides and bees. Environ. Entomology 12(5):1513-1518.

149699 Hays, H. (1980) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide Re view of Toxicological Data and Determination of Acceptable Daily Intake. Unpublished study prepared by Drill, Friess, Hays, Loomis and Shaffer, Inc. 31 p.

150006 Obrist, J. (1984) Comparison of Leaching Behavior of NEMACUR and Temik: Rept. No. 86288. Unpublished study prepared by Mobay Chemical Corp. 5 p.

150181 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1984) Aldicarb Residues in Forage, Fodder and Grain from Field Corn Treated with Temik 15G. Unpublished study. 31 p.

151820 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1985) Aldicarb Residues in Grape Products from Simulated Commercial Wine Processing. Unpublished compilation prepared in cooperation with Morse Laboratories. 22 p.

152095 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company (1984) The Names, Chemical Identity and Composition of the Pesticide Chemical [Aldicarb and Various Formulations). Unpublished compilation. 79 p.

154893 Myers, W. (1985) The Determination of the Anticipated Residue Values of Aldicarb in Potatoes and Citrus. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products, Inc. 76 p.

156961 Lightfoot, E.; Thorne, P.; Jones, R.; et al. (1986) Laboratory Studies on the Degradation Mechanisms of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide, and Aldicarb Sulfone. Unpublished study prepared by University of Wisconsin and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 73 p.

156962 Jones, R. (1986) Central California Studies on the Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb Residues: Preliminary Draft. Unpublished st udy prepared by Unio n Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 66 p.

### Page 143 of 191 156963 Dierberg, F.; Given, C. (1986) Aldicarb studies in ground waters from Florida citrus groves and their relation to ground-water protection. Ground Water 24(1):16-22.

156964 Porter, K.; Wagenet, R.; Hughes, H.; et al. (1986) Field Research on Aldicarb Management Practices for Upstate New York: [Degradadatio n of Aldicarb in Soils and Ground Waters-- Field Studies]. Unpublished study prepared by Cornell University and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 26 p.

156965 Jones, R.; Black, G.; Estes, T.; et al. (1986 ) Comparison of Computer Model Predictions with Unsaturated Zone Field Data for Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 20 p.

156966 Hegg, R.; Shelley, W.; Jones, R.; et al. (1986) Movement and Degradation of Aldicarb Residues in South Carolina Loamy Sand Soil. Unpublished study prepared by Clemson University and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 28 p.

156967 Carsel, R.; Parrish, R.; Jones, R.; et al. (1986) Characterizing the Uncertainty of Pesticide Leaching in Agricultural Soils. Unpublished study prepared by US Environmental Protection Agency and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 49 p.

156968 Jones, R.; Anderson, M.; Hornsby, A.; et al. (1986) Saturated Zone Movement and Degradation of Aldicarb Residues on the Florida Ridge: Preliminary Draft. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc., University of Wisconsin, and University of Florida. 274 p.

157027 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1986) Advisory: Temik Aldicarb Residues in Potable Water. Unpublished compilation. 94 p.

157987 Thomas, P. (1986) 34 Day Immunotoxicology Study of Aldicarb in Mice: Final Report: IITRI Project L08125. Unpublished study prepared by IIT Research Institute. 339 p.

158262 Crisp, C. (19) The Molecular Design of Systemic Insecticides and Organic Functional Groups in Translocation. Unpublished study prepared by US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkley, CA. 54 p.

158572 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. In c. (1986) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: [Residue Data and Associated Human Illness]. Unpublished compilation. 96 p.

159569 Lee, R.; Andrawes, N. (1986) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Aldi carb Anaerobic Aquatic Degradation: Project No. 803R10. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 26 p.

159570 Andrawes, N.; Lee, R. (1986) Temik Bran d Aldicarb Pesticide: Aldicarb Metabolism in Lactating Goats: Project No. 803R10. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 52 p.

159571 Hudson, J.; Romine, R. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Stability of Residues in Frozen Milk and Beef Liver: Project No. 803R12. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 24 p.

159572 Hudson, J.; Romine, R. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Potato Processing Study: Project No. 803R12. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 23 p.

159573 Myers, W. (1986) Letter sent to J. Lovell dated Feb 28, 1986: Temik/soybean processing study. Prepared by Union Carbide Agri cultural Products Co., Inc. 5 p.

### Page 144 of 191 160086 Back, R. (1985) A Review of Tests for Temik Aldicarb Pesticide Residues in Drinking Water Samples by State, USA and Canada, 19791984. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 9 p.

161701 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1984) Experimental Determination of the Degradation Rate of Aldicarb Residues in Long Island Groundwater. Unpublished study. 21

p.

161702 Wyman, J.; Jensen, J.; Curwen, D.; et al. (1983) Effects of App lication Procedures and Irrigation on Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb Residues in Soil. Unpublished study prepared by University of Wisconsin and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. Inc. 49 p.

161703 Wyman, J.; Curwen, D.; Hansen, J. (1984) Wisconsin Aldicarb and Aldoxycarb: Environmental Monitoring Study. Unpublished study prepared by University of Wisconsin and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 19 p.

161704 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Studies on Temik and Standak Tobacco Fields. Unpublis hed study prepared by Union Carb ide Agricultural Products Co. 19

p.

161705 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Tile-drained corn 1983 Studies Conducted in Michigan and Indiana. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. 16 p.

161706 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study: Temik and Standak Treated Arizona Cotton. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 17 p.

161707 Waggonet, R.; Porter, K.; Hansen, J.; et al. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study on Temik

Treated New York Potato Fiel ds. Unpublished study prepared by Cornell University and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 15 p.

161708 Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study on Temik Treated Washington Potato Fields. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 13 p.

161709 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1 984) Fate of Aldicarb in Florida Citrus Soils. Unpublished compilation. 102 p.

161733 Rourke, R.; Hansen, J.; Jones, R. (1984) Environmental Monitoring Study on Temik Treated Maine Potato Fields: Preliminary Draft. Unpub lished study prepared by University of Maine and Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 22 p.

161734 Myers, W. (1984) The Results of Tests on the Amount of Residue Remaining, including a Description of the Analytical Method Used: [Aldicarb on Grapes]. Unpublished compilation. 67 p.

162562 Romine, R. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide Residue in Instant Coffee: Laboratory Project Id.: 803R12. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. and General Foods Corp. 39 p.

162745 McCann, J.; Teeters, W.; Urba n, D.; et al. (1981) A short-term dietary toxicity test on small

mammals. P. 132-142 of the Second Co nference of Avian and Mammalian Wildlife Toxicology; published in American Society for Testing and Materials; 1981.

### Page 145 of 191 163274 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1986) Temik Aldicarb Pesticide: Rotational Crop Residues: [Summary]. Unpublished study. 39 p.

163275 Maitlen, J. (1982) Persiste nce of aldicarb in soil relative to the carry-over of residues into crops. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30(3): 589-592.

163276 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1986) Temik/Plant Back: Registration Analytical Chemistry Project Outline 1986: [P rotocol To Determine Magnitude of Aldicarb Residue in Plantback Crops]: Project No. T86-000-R06. Unpublished compilation. 12 p.

164424 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1967) Summary and Discussion [of Temik Residues in and on Potatoes and Soil]. Unpublished compilation. 107 p.

164934 Union Carbide Corp. (1965) Residue Data on UC 21149 Attached to and Constituting a Part of an Application for Temporary Permit To Ship Temik 10G. Unpublished compilation. 84 p.

165576 Union Carbide Corp. (1969) Summaries of Performance Data: Temik 10G Ornamental Plants. Unpublished compilation. 343 p.

5008199 Iverson, F. (1976) Binding constants for tetramethylammonium ion determined with

irreversible inhibitors of acet ylcholinesterase. Canadian Jour nal of Biochemistry 54(10):918-

920.

5008363 Hudson, R.H.; Haegele, M.A.; Tucker, R.K. (1979) Acute oral and percutaneous toxicity of pesticides to mallards: correlations with mammalian toxicity data. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 47(3):451-460.

5008444 Baron, R.L. (1978) Terminal residues of carbamate insecticides. Pure and Applied Chemistry 50(5):505-509.

5008717 Dorough, H.W. (1977) Metabolism of Carbam ate Insecticides. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Health Ef fects Research Laboratory. (EPA report no. EPA-600/1-77-012; available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB-266 223)

5008720 Rodell, S.; Funke, B.R.; Schu lz, J.T. (1977) Effects of insecticides on acetylene reduction byAzotobacter vinelandiiand soybean nodules. Plant and Soil 47(2):375-381.

5010222 Worthing, C.R. (1969) Performance of some new insecticides againstMyzus persicae(Sulzer) andTetranychus urticae(Koch) on year-round chrysanthemums . Journal of Horticultural Science 44(3):235-246.

5010817 Coppage, D.L. (1977) Anticholinesterase action of pesticidal carbamates in the central nervous system of poisoned fishes. Pages 93-102,InPhysiological Responses of Marine Biota to Pollutants, Proceedings of a Symposium; Nov, 1975, Milford, Connecticut. Edited by F.J. Vernberg, A. Calabrese, F.P. Thurberg and W.B. Vernberg. New York: Academic Press.

5010818 Harvey, J., Jr. (1975) Metabolism of Aldicarb and methomyl. Pages 389-393,InPesticides: International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Third International Congress; Jul 3-9, 1974, Helsinki, Finland. Edited by F. Coulston and F. Korte. Stuttgart, West Germany: George Thieme. (Environmental quality and safety supplement, vol. III)

5016283 Lindquist, R.K.; Spadafora, R.R. (1974) Insecticides for greenhouse whitefly control on poinsettias. Pages 5-6,InOhio Florists' Association Bulletin No. 536. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio

Florists' Association.

### Page 146 of 191 5017001 Gaikawad, S.T.; Samantaray, R.N.; Patnaik, S. (1973) Effect of soil application of biocides on N, P, K availability and C, N transformations in flooded rice soils. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 21(3):263-269.

5018266 Lijinsky, W.; Schmaehl, D. (1978) Carcinogenicity of N-nitroso derivatives of Nmethylcarbamate insecticides in rats. Ecotoxi cology and Environmental Safety 2(3/4):413-

419.

5018267 Quarles, J.M.; Sega, M.W.; Schenley, C.K.; Lijinsky, W. (1979) Transformation of hamster fetal cells by nitrosated pesticides in a tran splacental assay. Cancer Research 39(11):4525-

4533.

40065500 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1987) Toxicology Data Submitted in Support of Temik Brand 15 G Aldicarb Pesticide. Compilation of 2 studies.

40065501 Trutter, J. (1987) Aldicarb Foodborne Residue Toxicity Study in Monkeys--Watermelon: Laboratory Project Identification: HLA 400-720. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 95 p.

40065502 Trutter, J. (1987) Aldicarb Foodborne Residue Toxicity in Monkeys--Bananas: Laboratory Project Identification: HLA 400-720. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 92 p.

40166600 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. (1987) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

40166601 Hamada, N. (1987) Two-week Dose Range-finding Oral Toxicity Study in Beagle Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Lab Project ID: 400-717. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 94 p.

40216900 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (198 7) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 3 studies.

40216901 Pacenka, S.; Porter, K.; Jone s, R.; et al. (1987) Changing Aldi carb Residue Levels in Soil and Groundwater, Eastern Long Island, New York: 8661y. Unpublished study prepared by Cornell Univ., Center for Envi ronmental Research. 32 p.

40216902 Jones, R.; Marquardt, T. (1987) Monitoring of Aldicarb Residues in Long Island, New York Potable Wells: 8660y; 1234g. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 18 p.

40216903 Jones, R. (1987) The Aldicarb Experience: Results of Monitoring and Research Programs: 1309g; 8662y. Unpublished compilation prepared by Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., Inc. 48 p.

40232600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1987) Submission of Residue Data for Aldicarb in/on Foods in Grocery Markets. Transmittal of 1 study.

40232601 Petersen, B.; Gregorio, C. (1987) Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis: Interim Report. Unpublished study prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 429 p.

40390700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1987) Submission of Data in Response to Aldicarb Special Review. Transmittal of 1 study.

### Page 147 of 191 40390701 Anonymous (1987) Aldicarb National Food Survey (Supplemental Data for Aldicarb AcuteDietary Exposure Analysis Interim Report). Unpublished compilation prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 143 p.

40493300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of Temik

Aldicarb. Transmittal of 23 studies.

40493301 Jones, R. (1988) Summary of Aldicarb Research and Monitoring Update. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 8 p.

40493302 Jones, R. (1987) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in a Massachusetts Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 34 p.

40493303 Jones, R. (1987) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 34 p.

40493304 Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for Winter Application to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 85 p.

40493305 Jones, R. (1987) Volusia County Fernery Data Tables. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 7 p.

40493306 Jones, R. (1987) Florida Shallow Monitoring Wells Data Tables. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 35 p.

40493307 Jones, R.; Hornsby, A.; Rao, P.; et al. (1987) Movement and degradation of aldicarb residues in the saturated zone under citrus groves on the florida ridge. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 1(1987): 265-285.

40493308 Jones, R. (1987) Central california studies on the degradation and movement of aldicarb residues. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 1(1987):287-298.

40493309 Lightfoot, E.; Thorne, P.; Jones, R.; et al. (1987) Laboratory studies on mechanisms for the degradation of aldicarb, aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 6:377-394.

40493310 Jones, R.; Estes, T. (1987) Modeling unsaturated zone movement of aldicarb residues from applications to potatoes in eastern canada . Water Pollution Resource Journal of Canada 22(1):99-106.

40493311 Jones, R. (1987) Aldicarb environmental fa te studies conducted in the western united states. P. 105-108 in Fate of Pesticides in Environment by J. Bigger and J. Seiber, Publication 3320.

40493312 Jones, R.; Kirkland, S.; Chancey, E. ( 1987) Measurement of the environmental fate of aldicarb residues in a nebraska sand hills soil. Applied Agricultural Research 2(3):177-182.

40493313 Jones, R.; Marquardt, T. (1987) Monitoring of aldicarb residues in long island, new york potable wells. Archives of Environemental Contaminant and Toxicology 16:643-647.

40493314 Wyman, J.; Jones, R.; Medina, J.; et al. (1987) Environmental fate studies of aldicarb and aldoxycarb applications to wisconsin potatoes. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2:61-72.

40493315 Pacenka, S.; Porter, K.; Jone s, R.; et al. (1987) Changing al dicarb residue levels in soil and groundwater, eastern Long Island, New York. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 2:73-91.

### Page 148 of 191 40493316 Carsel, R.; Parrish, R.; Jones, R.; et al . (19) Characterizing the Uncertainty of Pesticide Leaching in Agricultural Soils. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 28 p.

40493317 Carsel, R.; Jones, R.; Hansen, J.; et al. (19) A Simulation Procedure for Groundwater Quality Assessments of Pesticides. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and University of Wisconsin. 28 p.

40493319 Jones, R. (1987) The Aldicarb Experience: 1. Conduct and Impact of Monitoring and Research Programs. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 24 p.

40493322 Jones, R.; Hornsby, A.; Rao, P. (1987) Degradation and Movement of Aldicarb Residues in Florida Citrus Soils. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with University of Florida. 30 p.

40493323 Carsel, R.; Jones, R. (19) Use of Soil and Meterologic Data Bases for Application of Unsaturated Zone Models for Evaluating Pesticide Transport and Transformation. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with U.S.

Environmental Protectio n Agency. 26 p.

40521600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Residue Summary Data to Support Data Regarding Aldicarb Import Tolerances. Transmittal of 1 study.

40521601 Gunderson, E. (1987) Summary of FY 87 Field Assignment "Pesticides in Imported Fresh Bananas". Unpublished study prepared by Food and Drug Administration. 9 p.

40542500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support the Registration of Temik (Aldicarb Pesticide): Dissipation Studies. Transmittal of 1 study.

40542501 Bostian, A.; Jones, R. (1988) Temik Bran d Aidicarb Pesticide: Limited Drinking Water Well Survey. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 54 p.

40551800 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1988) Submission of Data in Support of Aldicarb Residue Tolerances. Transmittal of 1 study.

40551801 Petersen, B.; Gregorio, C. (1988) Aldicarb Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis: Final Report. Unpublished compilation prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 1972 p.

40607500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Toxicological Data to Support the Continued Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G Alidicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 4 studies.

40607501 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Executive Summary: Application of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb to Three Major Crops: A Terrestrial Vertebrate Field Study and the Supplemental Report: Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Granule Incorporation Study. Unpublished study. 14 p.

40607502 Fletcher, D. (1988) Application of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb to Three Major Crops: A Terrestrial Verbebrate Field Study: BLAL Study No. 87 FV 3. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Life Associates, Ltd. 536 p.

40607503 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Granule Incorporation Study. Unpublished study. 71 p.

40607504 Spencer, D. (1985) A Review of the Research Conducted on the Toxicity and Potential

Hazard of Granular Formulations of Aldicarb (TEMIK) to Bird Life . Unpublished study. 34 p.

### Page 149 of 191 40636500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Environmental Fate Data to Support the Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

40636501 Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 89 p.

40636502 Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 36 p.

40645600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission Environmental Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

40645601 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Second Quarter Wisconsin Sampling. Unpublished study. 33 p.

40676700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Residue Data (Market Basket Survey) submitted To Support Aldicarb Registration. Transmittal of 1 study.

40676701 Peterson, B. (1988) Summary of the Review of the Aldicarb National Food Survey. Unpublished compilation prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 51 p.

40677300 US EPA (1 981) EPA Compiled Documents Receive d from the PM for Addition to the Carbaryl Registration Standard. Transmittal of 2 studies.

40677302 Dorough, H. (1973) Metabolism of Carbamate Insecticides: Report No. EPA-650/1-74-002. Unpubllished study prepared by Univ. of Kentucky, Dept. of Entomology. Available from NTIS: PB-231596. 255 p.

40685700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support the Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide: Residue Data. Transmittal of 1 study.

40685701 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Second Quarter Wiscousin Sampling (Second Batch). Unpublished study. 12 p.

40695900 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Toxicity Data submitted To Support Aldicarb Registration. Transmittal of 1 study.

40695901 Hamada, N. (1988) One-year Chronic Oral Toxicity Study in Beagle Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Project ID. 400-706. Unpublished st udy prepared by Hazl eton Laboratories America, Inc. 617 p.

40815800 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Environmental Residue Data to Support the Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

40815801 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues: Third Quarter Wisconsin Sampling. Unpublished study. 44 p.

40816600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik (Granular Aldicarb): Environmental Fate and Residue Chemistry Data. Transmittal of 12

studies.

40816601 Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 51 p.

### Page 150 of 191 40816602 Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 99 p.

40816603 Jones, R. (1988) Field Measurements of Water Samples in Volusia County Ferney: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 7 p.

40816604 Jones, R. (1988) Florida Shallow Monitoring Wells (Data Tables): Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 37 p.

40816605 Ou, L.; Rao, P.; Edvardsson, K.; et al. (1987) Aldicarb Degradation in Sandy Soils from Different Depths. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 14 p.

40816607 Carsel, R.; Jones, R.; Hansen, J.; et al. (1987) A Simulation Procedure for Groundwater Quality Assessments of Pesticides: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 16 p.

40816608 Jones, R.; Rao, P. (1988) Reflections on Validation and Applications of Unsaturated Zone Models: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 11 p.

40816609 Jones, R.; Gibb, J.; Hank, R. (1988) Revi ew of Unsaturated Zone Laeching Models from a User's Perspective: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Po ulenc Ag Co. 14 p.

40816610 Jones, R. (1988) The Aldicarb Experience: 1. Conduct and Impact of Monitoring and Research Programs. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 23 p.

40816611 Jones, R. (1988) The Aldicarb Experience: 2. Results of Monitoring and Research Programs. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 50 p.

40816612 Jones, R. (1988) Pesticides in Groundwater: Conduct of Field Research Studies: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 35 p.

40884600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1988) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik: Residue Chemistry Data. Transmittal of 1 study.

40884601 Romine, R. (1988) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Aldicarb Residues in Soybean Products: Project ID; 803R10; File No. 40429. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co., and Texas A&M University. 74 p.

40925800 U.S. EPA (1984) Standardized Transmittal Document for PDMS Entry of OPP Administrative Records: Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 document.

40925801 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1984) GS140: Aldicarb: Registration Standard. Unpublished study. 1775 p.

40987300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Degradation and Movement Data to Support the Registration for Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 4 studies.

40987301 Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 109 p.

40987302 Jones, R. (1988) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 53 p.

40987303 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues: Summary of Potable Well Monitoring Data for 1988. Unpublished study. 4 p.

### Page 151 of 191 40987304 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Fourth Quarter Wisconsin Second Sampling. Unpublished study. 11 p.

41004500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Toxicity Data to Support the Continued Registration of Temik Granular Pesticid e Products. Transmittal of 1 study.

41004501 Neeper-Bradley, T.; Tyl, R. (1988) Developmental Toxicity Evaluation of Aldicarb Administered by Gava ge to CD (Sprague-Dawley) Rats : Laboratory Project ID BRRC 51- 551: RPAC 40293. Unpublished study prepared by Union Carbide Bushy Run Research Center. 351 p.

41020300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Environmental Data to Support the Registration

Standard for Temik Brand 10% Granular Aldi carb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

41020301 Jones, R. (1989) Rhone-Poulenc Potable Well Survey Program Conducted During 1987: Additional Site Specific Data. Unpublished compilation. 335 p.

41020302 Jones, R. (1989) Buffer Zone Criteria for United States Soils. Unpublished compilation prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 308 p.

41023000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Residue Data to Support the Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

41023001 Romine, R. (1988) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide...Residue s in Rotational Crops: Project No. 803R10: 40455. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. in cooperation with Analytical Devel opment Corp. 278 p.

41054600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of Temik. Transmittal of 1 study.

41054601 IIT Research Ins titute (1989) Immunotoxicology Study of Aldicarb in Mice: Phase II: Final Report: IITRI Project No. L08181. Unpublished study. 254 p.

41075500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1989) Submission of Chemistry Data in Support of Temik Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 study.

41075501 Helfant, L. (1989) TEMIK brand Aldicarb Pesticide Product Chemistry. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 15 p.

41088600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Environmental Fate Data to Support the Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

41088601 Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulence Ag Co. 27 p.

41088602 Jones, R. (1989) The Aldicarb Experience: 2. Results of Monitoring and Research Programs. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 49 p.

41139500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Aldicarb Residue Data. Transmittal of 2

studies.

41139501 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Second Quarter 1989 Wisconsin First Sampling. Unpublished study. 41 p.

41139502 Jones, R. (1989) Progess Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study. 54 p.

### Page 152 of 191 41189600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Residue Data in Support of Temik brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal

41189601 Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 55 p.

41216000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Fate Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide EPA Reg No. 264-330 and 264426. Transmittal of 1 study.

41216001 Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 19 p.

41255500 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Submi ssion of Toxicity Data. Transmittal of 1 study.

41255501 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Biological Opinion on Selected Pesticides. Unpublished study. 891 p.

41290700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Submission of Data on Residues from Potable Wells in

Wisconsin. Transmittal of 2 studies.

41290701 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues: Third Quarter 1989 Wisconsin Second Sampling. 17 p.

41290702 Jones, R. (1989) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement in an Upstate New York Potato Field. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 59 p.

41363700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data in Support of Temik 15G and 10G

Aldicarb Pesticides Data Call-in: Aldicarb Nati onal Food Survey Interim Report. Transmittal of 1 study.

41363701 Romine, R. (1990) First Interim Report for the Aldicarb Data Callin: Temik Residues in National Food Survey Samples. Unpublished compilation prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 29 p.

41377100 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1990) Submission of Biological Opinion Data for Selected Pesticides. Transmittal of 1 study.

41377101 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1989) Biological Opinion Log on Selected Pesticides. Unpublished study. 677 p.

41378500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of Temik

Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

41378501 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1989) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Fourth Quarter 1989 Wisconsin First Sampling. Unpublished study. 16 p.

41378502 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Analyses of Aldicarb Residues Fourth Quarter 1989 Wisconsin Second Sampling. Unpublished study. 12 p.

41392900 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Data in Response to the Aldicarb Data Call-in. Transmittal of 1 study.

### Page 153 of 191 41392901 Romine, R. (1990) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Reanalysis of ANFS Samples: Lab Project Number: EC-89-062: 40720. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 52 p.

41482200 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Aldicarb Pesticide (Granular): Residue Chemistr y Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

41482201 Jones, R. (1990) Progress Report: Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for Winter Application to Grapes. Unpublished study prepared by Phone-Poulenc Ag Co. 129 p.

41509200 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Data to Support the Continued Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

41509201 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Aldicarb Residue Data from Potato Producing Companies. Unpublished study. 19 p.

41554200 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Summary Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G Granular Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

41554201 Florida Department of Agriculture (1990) Aldicarb Citrus Monitoring Data. Unpublished study. 7 p.

41575800 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

41575801 Trama, T. (1990) Letter Sent to Letter sent to J. Craig dated July 19, 1990: Temik residue analyses by season and variety. 5 p.

41608700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 study.

41608701 Hazleton Laboratories. (1990) Aldicarb Inte rim Cholinesterase Data and Incidence Summary: 5 Week Dog (2 Week Evaluation): Lab Project Number: HLA 656162. Unpublished study. 14

p.

41611100 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 study.

41611101 Hazleton Laboratories. (1990) Aldicarb Inte rim Cholinesterase Data and Incidence Summary: 5 Week Dog (2 Week Evaluation). Unpublished study. 14 p.

41656800 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data to Support the Registration of Temik. Transmittal of 1 Study.

41656801 Charles, J. (1990) Interim Data for Aldicarb 5 Week Dog Cholinesterase Evaluations: Lab Project Number: HLA/656162. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories Inc. 15

p.

41659700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support the Application for Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Groundwater Monitoring Studies.

Transmittal of 3 studies.

41659701 Davis, W. (1990) Letter Sent to Letter sent to B. Kapner dated Oct 12, 1990: Ground water monitoring study: TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. 3 p.

### Page 154 of 191 41659702 Rourke, R.; Jones, R. (1990) Potable Well Monitoring for Aldicarb: Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 18 p.

41659703 Jones, R. (1990) Rhone-Poulenc and Wiscousin Department of Natural Resources Well Monitoring for Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 27 p.

41661300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Toxicity Data to Support the Registration of

Temik. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

41661301 Ivett, J. (1990) Single Acute Exposure Dose Selection Study on Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 12010/0/459/PO. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Laboratories America, Inc. 15 p.

41661302 Ivett, J. (1990) Mutagenicity Test on Aldicarb Technical in the Mouse Bone Marrow Cytogenetic Assay: Lab Project Number: 12010/ 0/451. Unpublished study prepared by

Hazleton Laboratories Am erica, Inc. 57 p.

41662500 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Data to Support the Registration of the Temik Brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

41662501 Ayers, A.; Jones, R. (1990) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Limited Aldicarb Drinking Water Well Survey-II. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 335 p.

41668300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

41668301 Craig, J. (1990) Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services Sampling of Citrus for Residues of Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 7 p.

41708600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Data To Support Temik Brand Aldicarb Registration: Avian Toxicology Response Studies. Transmittal of 4 studies.

41708601 Hobson, J. (1990) Aldicarb: Toxicity to Avian Species: A Position Statement. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 22 p.

41708602 Hobson, J.; Fish, J. (1990) Aldicarb: Response to the Review by the Ecological Effects Branch of the 1987 Temik Brand Aldicarb Granular Incorporation Study Conducted by J. Fish. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 16 p.

41708603 Hobson, J. (1990) Aldicarb: Response to th e Review by the Ecological Effects Branch of the1987 Temik Terrestrial Vertebrate Field Study. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 20 p.

41708604 Kendall, R. (1990) Behavior, Survivability and Biochemical Response of Wild Mourning Doves (Zenaida macroura) Dosed with Aldicarb: Final Research Report Phase I: Lab Project Number: 08035. Unpublished study prepared by Clemson Univ., Institute of Wildlife and Environ. Toxicology. 29 p.

41739900 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Exposure Data In Support of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 Study.

41739901 Jones, P. (1990) Worker Exposure to Dichoromethane While Simulating The Loading of Temik Brand 15G for Application to Citrus: Lab Project Number: EF-89-27: 91C-4708. Unpublished study prepared by Res earch Triangle Institute. 206 p.

### Page 155 of 191 41749400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1990) Submission of Residue Study In Support of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 Study.

41749401 Chancey, E. (1990) Wisconsin Aldicarb Potable Well Sampling: Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 27 p.

41844700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Pr ogress Report June 1989 in Response to Data Call-In for Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Registration. Transmittal of 1 Study.

41844701 Harrison, S. (1991) Aldicarb Data Call-In Progress Report. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 17 p.

41845700 Mycogen Corp. (1991) Submission of efficacy data to support the registration of M-One Plus Bioinsecticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

41845701 Sorenson, K.; Bo ylan-Pett, W. (1990) Efficacy data on M-One Plus Bioinsecticide. Unpublished study prepared by North Carolina Ag. Extension, Michigan State Univ. and Univ. of Wisconsin. 104 p.

41865800 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb: Metabolism Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

41865801 Tyl, R.; Marr, M.; Myers, C. (1991) Prelim inary Evaluation of Aldicar b Excretion in the Milk of Lactating CD Rats Exposed to Aldicarb in the Diet: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 60C/4752. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 130 p.

41919900 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1991) Submission of toxicity data in support of reregistration of aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

41919901 Hamada, N. (1991) Subchronic Toxicity Study in Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Lab Project Number: 656-162. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 320 p.

41956100 Rhone-Poulenc (1991) Submission of toxicity data in support of reregistration of Aldicarb technical. Transmittal of 1 study.

41956101 Hamada, N. (1991) Subchronic Toxicity Study in Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Lab Project Number: 656-162. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 320 p.

41971800 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of product benefits data in support of registration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

41971801 Rhone-Poulenc Co. (1991) The Benefits to Agriculture of Pesticide Products Containing Aldicarb. Unpublished study. 282 p.

42002100 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Incident Report on Aldicarb for Section 6(a)(2) Requirements. Transmittal of 1 study.

42002101 Davis, W. (1991) Section 6(a)(2) Reporting on Aldicarb ^Overexposure Incident. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 5 p.

42004300 FMC Corp. (1991) Submission of Toxicological data to support the registration of AMMO Insecticides (Cypermethrin). Transmittal of 1 study.

42004301 Palmieri, M. (1991) Aquatic Mesocosm Study of Pesticide Products Containing the Active Ingredient Cypermethrin: Progress Report 13: Lab Project Number A89-2847. Unpublished study prepared by Wildlife International, Ltd. and FMC Corp. 5 p.

### Page 156 of 191 42004400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1991) Submission of residue data to support the registration of

Aldicarb. Transmittal of 3 studies.

42004401 Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: In-Orchard Variation of the Magnitude and Character of Aldicarb Residues in Oranges: Lab Project Number: EC-91-141. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 54 p.

42004402 Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: Comparison of GLC and HPLC Methods for Determining Residues of Aldicarb and It's Metabolites in Potatoes: Lab Project Number: EC-90-094. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 55 p.

42004403 Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: Effects of Microwave Cooking on Residues of Aldicarb and It's Metabolites in Potatoes: Lab Project Number EC-90-094. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 71 p.

42016900 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of residue data in support of registration of Temik brand aldicarb pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42016901 Hunt, T. (1991) Aldicarb: In-Orchard Variartion of the Magnitude and Character of Aldicarb Residues in Oranges and Grapefruit and Stability of These Residues in Commercial Storage: Lab Project Number: EC-90-093. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 95

p.

42017400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of environmental fate data in support of registration of Temik. Transmittal of 1 study.

42017401 Stratton, G. (1986) Metabolism of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone in

Potato Plants and in Plant Callus Tissue Cultures of Potato Tuber and Citron Fruit. Unpublished study prepared by University of Florida. 280 p.

42040600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of residue data to support the registration standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42040601 Tew, E. (1991) Aldicarb: Magnitude of the Residues in Bananas Treated with Temik 15G: Lab Project Number: EC-90-123. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 62

p.

42073400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Section 6(a)(2) FIFRA Requirements: Chronic Toxicity Study of Aldicarb on Rat. Transmittal of 1 study.

42073401 Davis, W. (1991) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated October 29, 1991: Concerning a chronic rat study being conducted on Aldicarb. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 1 p.

42073600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1991) Submission of metabolism data to support the registration standard for Aldicarb in Temik 15G. Transmittal of 1 study.

42073601 Hunt, T. (1991) Determination of Rate of Degradation of Aldicarb Carbamate Residues in Potatoes Stored under Simulated Commercial Conditions: Lab Project Number: EC-89-085: 40986. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Company. 39 p.

42121500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag. (1991) Submission of Section 6(a)(2) Data in Response to Request for Additional Factual Information Regarding Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Unreasonable Adverse Effects: Groundwater Monitoring Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

### Page 157 of 191 42121501 Chaney, E. (1991) Rhone-Poulenc Analyses of Water Sample from Wisconsin Wells for the Period August to October 1991. Unpublished study prepared Rhone-Poulenc Ag. 21 p.

42148400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Registration: Additional Factual Toxicology Information Regarding Unreasonable Adverse Effects Under Section 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study.

42148401 Lemen, J. (1991) Two-Generation Reproduction Study in Rats with Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 656-157. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 1946 p.

42154300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb: Toxicology (Exposure) Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

42154301 Peterson, H.; McPheeters, B.; et al. (1991) Preliminary Results of Rhone-Poulenc's Review of Goldman et al. "Aldicarb Food Poisoning in California 1985-1988: Toxicity Estimates for Humans" 45 Archives of Environmental Health 141 (1990). Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 64 p.

42180600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Company (1991) Submission of information in pursuant of Section 6(a)(2) of FIFRA reporting a potential overexposure of a 14 month old girl to a cookie treated with Temik and an unknown pelleted rodenticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42180601 Davis, W. (1991) Letter Sent to S. Haddad, December 10, 1991: (Letter concerning exposure of a child to Temik and an unknown rodenticide) . Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 1 p.

42191500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1991) Submission of Data To Support Registration of Temik (Aldicarb): Toxicology Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

42191501 Hamada, N.; Thakur, A. (1991) One-Year Chronic Oral Toxicity Study in Dogs with Aldicarb Technical: Addendum to Final Report: Lab Project Number: 400-706. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 13 p.

42226200 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support Temik Brand 15G (Aldicarb Pesticide) Registration for Label Amendments: Field Crop Accumulation Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

42226201 Hunt, T. (1992) Field Accumulation Study on Rotational Crops Temik/Plant-Back Residue Program: Lab Project Number: EC/R-89-002. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co.; Stewart Agricultural Research, In c.; Chemalysis Lab.; et al. 628 p.

42243300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of additional adverse effects data and incident reports concerning Temik (Aldicarb) under FIFRA 6(a)(2) status. Transmittal of 1 study.

42243301 W. Davis (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated February 19, 1992: Concerning deaths of an ocelot, two oppossums, and four raccoons at Atascosa Wildlife Refuge in Rio Hondo, Texas. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. 1 p.

42243400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support FIFRA 6(A)(2) Requirements for Temik Brand Aldicarb Adverse Effects. Transmittal of 1 study.

42243401 Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated February 24, 1992: Concerning Florida drinking potable water monitoring aldicarb. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 3 p.

42247200 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support Temik Brand Aldicarb Registration: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

### Page 158 of 191 42247201 Tew, E. (1992) Determination of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Treated with Temik 15G Under Furrow and Under Overhead Irrigation Practices in the Pacific Northwest: FinalReport: Lab Project Number: EC-90-115: 41095. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 132 p.

42275700 Rhone-Poulenc (1992) Submission of toxicity data in support of registration of Temik (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 study.

42275701 Lemen, J. (1992) Pilot Reproduction Study in Rats with Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 656- 156. Unpublished study prepared by Hazl eton Labs., America, Inc. 425 p.

42293700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue data in support of the registration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42293701 Gustafson, D. (1992) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in Wisconsin: Results for all Wells Sampled in 1991: Final Summary Repo rt: Lab Project Number: 41194. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 62 p.

42305800 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support Aldicarb Registration Standard: Residue Chemistry Study. Transmittal of 1 study.

42305801 Romine, R. (1989) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide: Aldicarb Residues in Dried PotatoProducts: Lab Project Number: 803R10: 40479. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag., Co. 72 p.

42307500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of Data To Support FIFRA 6(a)(2) Requirements for Aldicarb: Residue in drinking water. Transmittal of 1 study.

42307501 Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated April 28, 1992: (Concerning aldicarb,

aldicarb sulfoxide and sulfone residues in a dr inking water well). Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p.

42316000 Univ. of Georgia (1992) Submission of an incident report involving Furadan 4-F: Data submitted under FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study.

42316001 Smith, K. (1992) Clinical Necropsy report on three red-tailed hawks found near Edgefield, South Carolina. Prepared by Univ. of Ga., College of Veterinary Med. 2 p.

42316100 Univ. of Georgia (1992) S ubmission of an incident report involving Temik in the wildlife kill of a gray fox. Data submitted under FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study.

42316101 Smith, K. (1992) Clinical Necropsy Report on a Gray Fox Found near Edgefield, South Carolina. Unpublished study prepared by Univ. of Georgia, College of Veterinary Med. 2 p.

42316200 Univ. of Georgia (1992) S ubmission of an incident report involving Temik in a wildlife kill of

raccoons. Data submitted under FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmitta l of 1 study.

42316201 Smith, K. (1992) Clinical Necropsy Record on a Raccoon Found near Edgefield, South Carolina. Unpublished study prepared by Univ. of Ga., College of Veterinary Med. 2 p.

42316500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1992) Submission of incident reports under FIFRA 6(a)(2) Status (Adverse effects and incident report) to s upport the reregistration of Temik (Aldicarb) pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42316501 Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated May 11, 1992: Death of dogs and cats in two separate incidents related to Temik (Aldicarb). 2 p.

### Page 159 of 191 42372300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. (1992) Submission of Literature Review in Support of Registration for Temik brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42372301 Cole, P.; Pastides, H.; Rothman, K. (1992) The Epidemiologh of Aldicarb Exposure in Humans: A Critique of the Literature with emphasis on its Application to Risk Assessment: . Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 26 p.

42373000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of safety data in support of the registration standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42373001 Wyld, P.; Watson, C.; Nimmo, W.; et al. ( 1992) A Safety and Tolerability Study of Aldicarb at Various Dose Levels in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers: Lab Project Number: 003237. Unpublished study prepared by Inveresk Clinical Research. 372 p.

42436500 Rhone-Poulen c Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue an alytical methods data in support of TEMIK brand Aldicarb pesticide registration.

42436501 Ver Hey, M. (1992) Testing of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfone and Aldicarb Sulfoxide through Protocol E: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 1181. Unpublished study prepared by Colorado Analytical Research & Development Corp. 35 p.

42436600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Supplemental submission of residue data in support of the data

call-in for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 6 studies.

42436601 Honeycutt, R.; Andrawes, N. (1992) Summary Report on the Nature of Residues of carbon 14-Aldicarb in Plants: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 92-102. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 70 p.

42436602 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1992) Metabolism and Associated Residues of Temik (2-methyl2-(methylthio) propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (TEMIK) in Sugar Beet Plants: Lab Project Number: 111B19: 12694. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 52 p.

42436603 Andrawes, N. (1992) The Metabolism and Terminal Residues of Temik Aldicarb Pesticide in Peanut Plants under Field Conditions: Lab Project Number: 111A12: 17613. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 47 p.

42436604 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1992) Degradation of 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O-(methylcarbamoyl)oxime (TEMIK) in Potato Foliage: Reformatted: Lab Project Number: 111B19: 10495. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 44 p.

42436605 Andrawes, N.; Bagley, W. (1992) Metabolism of 2-methyl-2-(methylthio)propionaldehyde O- (methylcarbamoyl)oxime (TEMIK Aldicarb Pesticide) in Potato Plants: Reformatted. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 60 p.

42436606 Andrawes, N.; Romine, R.; Bagley, W. (1992) Metabolism and Residues of TEMIK Aldicarb Pesticide in Cotton Foliage and Seed under Field Conditions: Reformatted. Unpublished study prepared by H.E.R.A.C. 82 p.

42446500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of toxicity data to support the registration standard for Temik (aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 study.

42446501 Kendall, R. (1992) Behavior, Survivability and Biochemical Response of Wild Northern Bobwhites (Colinus virginianus) Dosed with Temik: Lab Project Number: 08034. Unpublished study prepared by Clemson Univ., Inst. of Wildlife and Environ. Tox. 34 p.

### Page 160 of 191 42456000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of fate data in support data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements of Temik brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42456001 Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to Sepehr Haddad dated August 10, 1992 concerning residues of

aldicarb sulfone and aldicarb sulf oxide in two Florida wells. Prepar ed by Rhone-Poulenc. 2 p.

42456100 Rhone-Poulenc (1992) Submission of fate data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for Temik Brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42456101 Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to Office of Pesticide Programs dated August 28, 1992 concerning Aldicarb in a well in Maine. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 1 p.

42456200 Rhone-Poulenc (1992) Submission of fate data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for Temik brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42456201 Gustafson, D. (1992) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Analyzed 1Q, 1992 (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): Lab Project Number: 41206: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 55 p.

42467300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue chemistry data to support Aldicarb reregistration. Transmittal of 2 studies.

42467301 Tew, E. (1992) Aldicarb: Stability of Residue on Frozen Potato Processed Fractions: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-201. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 62 p.

42467302 Tew, E. (1992) Aldicarb: Stability of Residu es on Frozen Soybean Processed Fractions: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-200. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 54 p.

42487600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of residue survey data to support registration of TEMIK products. Transmittal of 1 study.

42487601 Rogers, C. (1992) Aldicarb Survey 1991: Texas. Unpublished study prepared by Texas Water Commission. 9 p.

42498200 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submittal of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the

Aldicarb Data Call-in. Transmittal of 2 studies.

42498201 Das, Y. (1990) Photodegradation of (S-Methyl-carbon 14) Aldicarb in Aqueous Solution Buffered at pH 5 under Artificial Sunlight: Lab Project Number: 90021. Unpublished study prepared by Innovative Scientific Services, Inc. 91 p.

42498202 Dykes, J. (1990) Soil Adsorption/Desorption with Carbon 14Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 37352. Unpublished study prepared by Analytical Bio-Chemistry Laboratories, Inc. 326 p.

42509400 Rhone Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submittal of chronic oncogenicity data on Aldicarb in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2). Transmittal of 1 study.

42509401 Davis, W. (1992) Letter Sent to Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated September 29, 1992 Regarding the Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Feeding Study in Rats. Prepared by Rhone Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p.

42515700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1992) Submission of TEMIK residue chemistry data under FIFRA 6(a)(2) to support TEMIK products registration. Transmittal of 1 study.

### Page 161 of 191 42515701 Davis, W. (1992) Letter sent to S. Haddad dated Oct. 9, 1992: TEMIK brand Aldicard pesticide residues in Florida drinking water wells. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p.

42523400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag. Co. (1992) Submission of product chemistry data to support a formulation amendment for Temik (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 study.

42523401 Crownover, R. (1992) Aldicarb Solution, Technical Product Identity and Composition...: Lab Project Number: AC-92-009: 41264. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag. 13

p.

42561200 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. (1992) Submission of residue survey in support of registration for Aldicarb (Temik). Transmittal of 4 studies.

42561201 Harrison, S.; Petersen, B. ; Barraj, L. (1992) Aldicarb Orange Monitoring Survey Outline. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. and Technical Assessment Systems Inc. 25 p.

42561202 Brown, E. (1992) Procedures for Florida Orange Processing. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Comp. 6 p.

42561203 Tomerlin, J.; Petersen, B. (1992) Summary of Aldicarb Monitoring in Florida as of October 23, 1992. Unpublished study prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 17 p.

42561204 Benell, N. (1991) Monitoring Data for Aldicarb in Grapefruit and Oranges. Unpublished study prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 48 p.

42643900 Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of environmental data in support of the registration for Temik 15G Aldicarb pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42643901 Spare, W. (1993) Soil Photolysis of Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 1515. Unpublished study prepared by Agrisearch Inc. 175 p.

42659500 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1993) Submission of residue chemistry data concerning Temik under FIFRA 6(A)2. Transmittal of 1 study.

42659501 Davis, W. (1993) Letter Sent to S. Haddad dated on Feb. 2, 1993: Preliminary results from residue trial studies concerning Temik. Pr epared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 4 p.

42687100 Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of environmental fate data in support of the registration of

TEMIK 15G Brand Aldicarb Pesticides. Transmittal of 2 studies.

42687101 Gustafson, D. (1993) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Analyzed 2Q, 1992 (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): (Quarterly PhaseReport): Lab Project Number: 41267: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 81 p.

42687102 Gustafson, D. (1993) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Analyzed 3Q, 1992 (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): (Quarterly PhaseReport): Lab Project Number: 41308: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 140 p.

42722300 Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of residue data in support of the registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42722301 Tew, E. (1993) Temik: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Sweet Potatoes: Lab Project Number: USA92T02: 41382. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 164 p.

### Page 162 of 191 42725800 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1993) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for TEMIK brand Aldi carb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

42725801 Davis, W. (1993) Letter sent to S. Haddad dated March 23, 1993 reporting results from sampling of Florida drinking water wells from the Dept. of Environmental Regulation. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 5 p.

42749600 Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of residue data in support of registration for Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

42749601 Petersen, B. (1993) Estimation of Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Sweet Potatoes. Unpublished study prepared by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. 9 p.

42796000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1993) Submission of product chemistry data in support of the registration for Temik brand aldicarb pe sticide. Transmittal of 2 studies.

42796001 McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D.; Young, K. (1987) Aldicarb Vapor Pressure Evaluation: Lab Project Number: 803P15: 40052. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 8 p.

42796002 McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D.; Young, K. (1987) Aldicarb: Design and Validation of High Flow Apparatus for Vapor Pressure Determinatio ns: Lab Project Number: 40182: 8710020. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 20 p.

42797900 Rhone-Poulenc (1993) Submission of environmental fate data in support of the FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

42797901 Davis, W. (1993) Letter sent to Office of Pesticide Programs dated May 26, 1993: Aldicarb drinking water detection in Florida, Maine and Wisconsin. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc. 4 p.

42827800 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1993) Submission of residue data in support of the registration for

TEMIK. Transmittal of 4 studies.

42827801 Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Processed Potatoes: Potato Fractions: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC -92-211: 44121. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 229 p.

42827802 Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Determination of Variation in Magnitude and Character of Aldicarb

Residues in Potatoes from Temik-Treated Fiel ds: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-90- 092: EC-90-117: 41207. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 618 p.

42827803 Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Grown from Seed Pieces Injected with Aldicarb Sulfoxide at 1.0 PPM: Final Re port: Lab Project Number: EC92-208: 41354. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 90 p.

42827804 Tew, E. (1993) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Grown with Available Overhead Irrigation in 1992: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-180: 41395. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 283 p.

42935000 Rohm and Haas Company (1993) Submission of Toxicity Data, Residue Chemistry Data,

Environmental Fate Data and Product Chemis try Data for Triazamate in Support of an Experimental Use Permit and Petition for Temporary Tolerance on Apples. Transmittal of 71

Studies.

### Page 163 of 191 42935042 Parkin, D. (1991) Comparison of IC-50 and T 1/2 of Aldicarb and RH-7988 on Human Plasma Cholinesterase: Lab Project Number: 89P-141: 89R-141. Unpublished study prepared by Rohm and Haas Company, Toxicology Department. 40 p.

43045400 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1993) Submission of toxicology data in support of registration for TEMIK 15G brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

43045401 Trutter, J. (1993) Combined Chronic Toxicity and Oncogenicity Study in Rats with Aldicarb Technical: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 656/151: HWA/656/151. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Washington, Inc. 3532 p.

43084100 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1994) Submittal of Residue Data in Support of Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

43084101 Byrd, J. (1994) A Nature of the Residue Study with (carbon 14)-Aldicarb in Laying Hens: Lab Project Number: 9285C: 819: EC-91-221. Unpublished study prepared by Southwest Bio-Labs, Inc. 348 p.

43110600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submittal of Residue Data in Support of Registration of TEMIK brand Aldicarb Pesticide for Citrus. Transmittal of 1 study.

43110601 Tew, E.; Peterson, B.; Barraj, L.; et al. (1994) Aldicarb Fresh-Market Orange MonitoringStudy: Final Report: Lab Project Number: EC-92-216. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. and Morse Labs, Inc. 154 p.

43138500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of residue data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for TEMIK 15G brand Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

43138501 Davis, W. (1994) Letter Sent to Office of Pe sticide Programs dated Feb. 17, 1994 concerning monitoring of wells in Florida for possible al dicarb residues. Prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 9 p.

43143800 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1994) Submission of ground water monitoring data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

43143801 Jones, R. (1994) Site Specific Information Related to Aldicarb Well Monitoring Conducted by Rhone-Poulenc AG Company. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. 26

p.

43154400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submittal of Residue Data in Support of Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

43154401 Dean, P. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Analyzed 4Q, 1992 and 1Q, 1993 (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): Lab Project Number: 44124: EC-92-182. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 169 p.

43193600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of residue data in support of registration for TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 study.

43193601 Chancey, E. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis April 1 th rough December 31, 1993 (Exclusive of LongIsland, NY): Lab Project Number: 44306: EC/92/182. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 175 p.

43277100 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1994) Submission of residue data in support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) requirements for aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 study.

### Page 164 of 191 43277101 Davis, W. (1994) Letter Sent to Office of Pesticide Programs dated June 21, 1994: (Concerning Aldicarb residues above the 10 ppb MCL found in well samples in Florida and Wisconsin). Prepared by Rhon e-Poulenc AG Co. 15 p.

43299000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Conditional Registration of TEMIK 15G. Transmittal of 6 Studies.

43299001 Fish, J. (1994) Comparison of Applicatio n Characteristics of Positive Displacement Granular Applicators and Gravity Flow Granular Applicators: Lab Project Number: 44303: USAATG9301. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Clayton Research Station. 78

p.

43299002 Tew, E. (1994) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes Resulting from Application Using Gravity Fl ow and Positive Displacement Application Equipment: Final Study Report: Lab Project Number: USA93T70: 44412: 93-001. Unpublished study prepared by Phone-Poulenc Ag Co. 3255 p.

43299003 Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analysis: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 94-01. Unpublished study pr epared by Techniacl Assessment Systems, Inc. 56 p.

43299004 Rao, K. (1994) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Processed Potato Fractions: Addendum: Chain of Custody Records for Processed Samples: Lab Project Number: EC-92- 211. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 10 p.

43299005 Rao, K. (1994) Determination of Variation in Magnitude and Character of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes from Temik-Treated Fields: Addendum: Summary of Sample Storage Intervals: Lab Project Number: EC-90-092: EC-90-117. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 6 p.

43299006 Rao, K. (1994) Aldicarb--Stability of Residues on Frozen Potato Processed Fractions:Addendum: Quantitative Data Tables & Example Chromatograms: Lab Project Number: EC92-201. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 70 p.

43325400 DuPont Agricultural Products (1994) Submission of environmental fate data in support of registration standard for methomyl. Transmittal of 3 studies.

43325402 Smelt, J.; Dekker, A.; Leistra, M.; et al. (1983) Conversion of four carbamoyloximes in soil samples from above and below the soil water table. Pesticide Science 14:173-181.

43325403 Bromilow, R.; Briggs, G.; Williams, M. et al. (1986) The role of ferrous ions in the rapid degradation of oxamyl, methomyl, and aldicarb in anaerobic soils. Pesticide Science 17:535-

547.

43346700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of Residues in the Environment Data in Support of TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Registrations. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43346701 Jones, R. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis April 1 Through June 30, 1994: (Quarterly Phase Report): Lab Project Number: EC-92-182: 44462. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 103 p.

43385000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of residue and exposure data in support of registration for TEMIK. Transmittal of 2 studies.

### Page 165 of 191 43385001 Tew, E. (1994) TEMIK: Magnitude and Distribution of Aldicarb Residues in Potatoes From

the Mid-Row Areas of 1993 Florida Test Pl ots Established with Positive Displacement Application (PDA) Equipment: Final Report: Lab Project Number: US94T02R: 44514. Unpublished study prepared by Morse Lab., Inc. 157 p.

43385002 Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analyses: RevisedReport: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB/94/01. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 56 p.

43442300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of toxicity data in support of Data Call-in for

Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 5 studies.

43442301 Robinson, K.; Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1994) An Acute Study of the Potential Effects of Orally Administered Aldicarb, Technical Grade, on Behavior and Neuromorphology in Rats: Lab Project Number: 97235. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 712 p.

43442302 Robinson, K.; Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1994) A Time of Peak Behavioral Effects Study of a Single Oral Administration of Aldicarb, Technical Grade, in Rats: Lab Project Number: 97236. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 278 p.

43442303 Robinson, K.; Broxup, B. (1994) An Acute Benchmark-Dose Toxicity Study of Orally Administered Aldicarb, Techni cal Grade, in Rats: Lab Project Number: 97277. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 65 p.

43442305 Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1994) An Acute Study of the Time Course of Cholinesterase Inhibition by Aldicarb Technical, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone in the Rat: Lab Project Number: 97352. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Lab. Ltd. 358 p.

43453800 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1994) Submission of Residue Data in Support of Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmission of 1 Study.

43453801 Jones, R. (1994) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis July 1 Through September 30, 1994: Lab Project Numbers: EC-92-182: 44559. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 100 p.

43575100 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43575101 Tyl, R.; Marr, M.; Myers, C. (1995) Modified Dominant Lethal Evaluation of Aldicarb Administered in the Feed to CD (Sprague-Daw ley) Rats: Final Repor t: Lab Project Numbers: 65C-5880. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 323 p.

43591700 E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (1995) Submission of Pesticide Fate & Residues in the Environment and Exposure/Risk to Non-Target Organisms Data in Support of the Atrazine, Simazine, and Cyanazine Regi stration Standards. Transmittal of 13 Studies.

43591710 Georgia Agribusiness Council. (1995) What's in a number EPA needs to return to the basics: Well sampling by county. The Predicate. p. 1.

43599300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Exposure Data in Support of Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

43599301 Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analyses: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 94-01. Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 56 p.

### Page 166 of 191 43599302 Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1994) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analyses: Revised Report: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 94-01. Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 56 p.

43599303 Petersen, B.; Barraj, L. (1995) Aldicarb in Potatoes: Dietary Exposure Analyses. Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 18 p.

43608800 Monsanto Co. (1995) Submission of Residue in the Environment Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Alachlor and Atrazine. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43608801 Weppelman, R. (1995) Letter sent to Office of Pesticide Programs dated April 6, 1995 transmitting a report from the Tennessee Dept. of Agriculture describing the results of their ground water monitoring program for 1994. Prepared by Monsanto, The Agricultural Group. 7 p.

43617800 Ciba-Geigy Corp. (1995) Submission of Residues in the En vironment and Hazard to Aquatic Organisms Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Diazinon. Transmittal of 9 Studies.

43617801 Ross, L. (1991) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: March and April, 1991: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 17 p.

43617802 Ross, L. (1992) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Summer 1991: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 15 p.

43617803 Ross, L. (1992) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Winter 1991-2: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 17 p.

43617804 Ross, L. (1993) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Spring 1992: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 14 p.

43617805 Ross, L. (1993) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Summer 1992: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 15 p.

43617806 Ross, L. (1993) Preliminary Results of the San Joaquin River Study: Winter 1992-3: (Diazinon, Ethyl Parathion, Carbaryl, Dimethoate, and Carbofuran...). Unpublished study prepared by State of California, Dept. of Pesticide Regulation. 16 p.

43617808 Nordmark, C. (1994) Four River Monitoring Protocol: Revised: (Includes "Preliminary Results of the Four River Study, Sacramento River, Winter/Spring 1993-1994"). Unpublished study prepared by California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 13 p.

43623700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residues in the Environment Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43623701 Denny, J.; Jones, R. (1995) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis October 1 Through December 31, 1994: Lab Project Number: EC-92-182: 44683. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 60 p.

43628100 Ciba-Geigy Corp. (1995) Submission of Residues in the Environment Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Various Pesticides Registered to Ciba. Transmittal of 1 Study.

### Page 167 of 191 43628101 Shahane, A. (19 94) Pesticide Detections in Surface Wa ters of Florida. Unpublished study prepared by Florida Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services. 9 p.

43633400 E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (1995) Submission of Toxicology and Residue Data in Support of the Special Review for Atrazine, Simazine and Cyanazine. Transmittal of 5

Studies.

43633401 Heindel, J.; Chapin, R.; Gulati, D. et al. (1993) Assessment of the reproductive and developmental toxicity of pesticide/fertili zer mixtures based on confirmed pesticide contamination in California and Iowa ground water. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology

22:605-621.

43649200 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Pesticide Misuse and Toxicity Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) for Temik (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 Study.

43649201 Davis, W. (1995) Letter Sent to D. Edwards dated May 13, 1995: TEMIK 15G brand Aldicarb pesticide: (three dog poisoning incidents and summary of 13 week oral neurotoxicity test in rats preliminary information). Prepar ed by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 2 p.

43681500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of risk/exposure data in support of reregistration for TEMIK 15G (Aldicarb). Transmittal of 1 study.

43681501 Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1995) Estimation of the Potential Exposure To Aldicarb in Foods: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 95-01. Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 22 p.

43702800 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Exposure Data in Support of Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43702801 Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1995) Estimation of the Potential Exposure to Aldicarb in Foods: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 95-01. Unpublished study prepared by TAS, Inc. 28 p.

43761500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residues in the Environment Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43761501 Denny, J.; Jones, R. (1995) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis January 1 through June 30, 1995: (Exclusive of Long Island): Lab Project Number: EC-92-182: 44815: 92682. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 57 p.

43805700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

43805701 Skinner, W.; Jao, N. (1995) Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism of (Carbon 14)-Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 468W-1: 468W: EC-94-275. Unpublished study prepared by PTRL West, Inc. 138 p.

43805702 Skinner, W. (1995) Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism of (Carbon 14)-Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: 467W-1: 467W: EC-94-274. Unpublished study prepared by PTRL West, Inc. 141

p.

43829600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Toxicology Data in Support of FIFRA 6(a)(2) and the Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

### Page 168 of 191 43829601 Weiler, M. (1995) Developmental Neurotoxicity Study with Aldicarb in Rats: Final Report: Lab Project Number: HWI 6224-213. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Wisconsin, Inc. 891 p.

43829602 Robinson, K.; Brooks, W.; Broxup, B. (1995) A 13-Week Study of the Potential Effects of Orally Administered Aldicarb Technical on Behavior, Neurochemistry and Neuromorphology in Rats: Lab Project Number: 97234. Unpublished study prepared by Bio-Research Labs, Ltd. 825 p.

43842000 FMC Corp. (1995) Submission of Residue and Exposure: Reentry Protection Data in Support of the Registration Standard for Carbofuran. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43842001 Carlson, D. (1995) Soil Residue Dissipation, Dermal Passive Dosimetry Exposure and Inhalation Passive Dosimetry Exposure--Potatoes: Justification for Waiver of Carbofuran Data Call-In. Unpublished study prepared by FMC Corp. 71 p.

43842400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43842401 Gillings, O. (1995) Storage Stability of Al dicarb Residues in Green Coffee Beans, Roasted Coffee Beans, and Instant Coff ee: Lab Project Number: EC-94-293: 44916. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 226 p.

43844700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43844701 Andrawes, N.; Smitley, C. (1995) Aldi carb--Stability of Residues on Frozen Soybean Processed Fractions: Addendum: Quantitative Da ta Tables & Example Chromatograms: Lab Project Number: EC-92-200: SOP-90025. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 55 p.

43852500 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1995) Submission of Exposure Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43852501 Rosenheck, L.; Schuster, L. (1995) Worker Loader and Applicator Exposure to Temik 15G: Lab Project Number: 94388. Unpublished study prepared by ABC Labs, Inc., Pan-Ag Div. 344 p.

43902400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Fate in Plants Data in Support of the Registration Standard for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43902401 Hathcock, T.; Kimmel, E.; Ruzo, L. (1996) A Metabolism Study with (Carbon 14)-Aldicarb in Citrus (Lemon Trees): Lab Project Number: 478W-1: 478W: EC-94-278. Unpublished study prepared by PTRL West, Inc. 234 p.

43961100 U.S. EPA (1996) Submission of Toxicity Data on 17 Pesticides. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43961101 McCann, J.; Teeters, W.; Urban, D. et al. (1 981) A short-term dietary toxicity test on small mammals. p. 132-142 of the Second Conference of Avian and Mammalian Wildlife Toxicology, Lamb, D.; Kenaga, E. Eds.; Published in American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM STP 757; 1981.

43970000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Residue Chemistry Data in Support of TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

### Page 169 of 191 43970001 Wells-Knecht, M.; Andrawes, N. (1996) (C arbon 14)-Aldicarb Metabolism in Citrus (Lemon Trees): Supplemental Report to MRID No. 43902401: Lab Project Number: EC-95-320. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 286 p.

43988300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Pesticide Fate in the Environment Data in Support of Reregistration of TEMIK Brand 15G Al dicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43988301 Jones, R. (1996) Measurement of Aldicarb Degradation and Movement for Winter Applications to Grapes: Lab Project Number : 45049. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 131 p.

43994400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Pesticide Fate & Residues in the Environment Data in Support of Registration Standard for TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

43994401 Denny, J.; Jones, R. (1996) Potable Well Water Monitoring for Aldicarb in the United States: Results for Samples Submitted for Analysis July 1 through December 31, 1995: (Exclusive of Long Island, NY): Lab Project Number: 44991: EC-92-182: SOP 90009. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 58 p.

44005000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1996) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Aldicarb Registration Standard. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44005001 Das, Y. (1990) Metabolism of (S-Methyl-(carbon 14))Aldicarb Under Aerobic Soil Conditions: Lab Project Number: EC-90-099: 90020. Unpublished study prepared by Innovative Scientific Services, Inc. 85 p.

44196700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Amended Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G NW Aldicar b Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44196701 Tew, E. (1996) TEMIK: Magnitude of Aldicarb Residues in Pacific Northwest Potatoes Harvested 120 Days After an At-Planting, In-Furrow Application of TEMIK 15G at 3 lb ai/Acre: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 96T10525: 45187: 10525-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag co. 414 p.

44204900 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure/Risk Data in Support of the Amended Registrations of Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide and Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide Lock 'n Load Closed Handling System. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

44204901 Barraj, L. (1996) Assessing the Impact of Reducing the PHI for Aldicarb on Potatoes to 120 Days: Comparison of the Potential Exposure to Aldicarb Using Monitoring Data and Data from the 120 Day PHI Field Trial Study. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 14 p.

44204902 Barraj, L. (1996) Using the 1996 Florida and PNW Monitoring Data to Estimate the Potential Exposure to Aldicarb on Potatoes. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 15

p.

44209000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Registration of Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44209001 Tew, E. (1997) Temik: Pacific Northwest Potato Farmgate Study: Amended Final Report: Lab Project Number: 96T11379: 45217. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 194 p.

### Page 170 of 191 44244700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Amended Registration for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44244701 Tew, E. (1997) Temik: Magnitude of Residues in Potatoes from Regions V and IX Harvested 120 Days After an At-Planting Application of Temik 15G at 3 lb ai/acre: Lab Project Number: 96T11218: 45257: 11218-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 447 p.

44287600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure and Risk Assessment Data in Support of the Reregistration of TEMIK Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44287601 Barraj, L. (1997) Estimating the Potential Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Foods: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 97-03. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 24 p.

44335700 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure/Risk Data in Support of the Label Amendments and Crop Group Petition for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticides in/on Citrus. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44335701 Barraj, L. (1997) Estimating the Potential Aggregate Exposure to Aldicarb in Food andWater: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 97-04. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Co. 28 p.

44338600 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Exposure/Risk Data in Support of the Label Amendment for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44338601 Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1997) Assessing the Impact of the Temik Label Expansion on the Potential Exposure to Aldicarb in Potatoes: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 97-02. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 18 p.

44341800 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. (1997) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Amended Registration for Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pe sticide and Tolerance Petition for Aldicarb in/on Citrus. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44341801 Tew, E. (1997) Temik: Florida Potato Farmgate Study: Lab Project Number: 97T12422: 45366. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 287 p. {OPPTS 860.1500}

44524600 Rhone-Poulenc AG Co. (1998) Submission of Exposure and Risk Assessment Data in Support of the Registration of Temik Brand Al dicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44524601 Barraj, L.; Petersen, B. (1998) Using the Elapsed Time Approach to Estimate the Potential Aggregate Exposure to Aldica rb in Food and Water: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 98- 01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 30 p.

44580900 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Residue Chemistry Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44580901 Jones, R.; Scarborough, T. (1998) Rhone- Poulenc Ag Company Response to April 9, 1998 EFED Requests for Information on Aldicarb: Lab Project Number: AS-98-01: RTP-2162. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone Poulenc Ag Co. 111 p.

44585400 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Submission of Environmental Fate, Toxicity, and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Organophosphorus and Carbamate Compounds. Transmittal of 16 Studies.

### Page 171 of 191 44585406 Bischoff, A.; Linn, J.; Hagen, H. (1970) Evaluations of Pest Control Programs: Lab Project Number: FW-1-R-8: I-4. Unpublished study prepared by Shell Development Co., Union Carbide Company, State Department of Public Health and Mosquito Abatement Districts. 12

p.

44598600 US EPA (1998) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb and Fonofos. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44598601 Pickering, Q.; Gilliam, W. (1982) Toxicity of aldicarb and fonofos to the early-life-stage of

the fathead minnow. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 11:699-702.

44598700 Hercules, Inc. (1998) Submission of Toxicity, Product Chemistry, Exposure and Risk Assessment Data in Support of the Petition for Tole rance of (inert ingredients). Transmittal of

9 Studies.

44598701 van Straten, S. (1998) Volatile Compounds in Food (Naturally Occurring (inert ingredients)). Unpublished study prepared by TNO. 15 p.

44598702 The Committee of Flavour Experts of the Council of Europe. (1998) Monographs for (inert ingredients). Natural Flavouring Substances, Th eir Sources, and Added Artificial Flavouring Substances (5)4:2-3.

44598703 Opdyke, D. (1978) Fragrance raw material monographs for (inert ingredients). Food and Cosmetics Toxicology (16):853-861.

44598704 Palazzolo , R. (1963) Acute Toxicity Studies on (inert ingredients): (Acute Oral Toxicity and Eye Irritation) (in Rats and Rabbits): Lab Proj ect Number: 92-2F. Unpub lished study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs., Inc. 12 p.

44598705 Nelson, L.; Kundzin, M. (1968) Three-Month Dietary Feeding in Albino Rats: (inert ingredients): Lab Project Number: 92-2A. Unpublished study prepared by Hazleton Labs., Inc. 52 p.

44598706 Kohn, F. (1963) 90-Day Subacute Oral Toxicity of (inert ingredients) in Albino Rats: Lab Project Number: 92-2E. Unpublished study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs, Inc. 50 p.

44598707 Kohn, F. (1964) Two-Year Chronic Oral Toxicity Study of (inert ingredients) in Albino Rats: Lab Project Number: 92-2C. Unpublished study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs., Inc. 114 p.

44598708 Cervenka, H. (1964) Two-Year Chronic Oral Toxicity of (inert ingredients) in Beagle Dogs: Lab Project Number: 92-2D. Unpublished study prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labs., Inc. 83 p.

44598709 Safe, S. (1994) Environmental and dietary (inert ingredients) and human health: is there a problem Environmental Health Perspectives 13(103):346-351.

44613200 Rhone-Poulenc (1998) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Registration of Temik 15G Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44613201 Norris, F. (1998) Aldicarb: Mobility in Soil After Application to Florida Ridge Soils Under the Best Management Plan: Lab Project Number: 96T09666: 45613: 95-199-001. Unpublished study prepared by HydroScience, Inc. and Agvise Laboratories, Inc. 1586 p.

44636100 Rhone Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Registration of Temik 15 G. Transmittal of 1 Study.

### Page 172 of 191 44636101 Tyl, R.; Ross, W.; Myers, C. (1998) Asse ssment of Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats Following Topical Application of Temik 15G Grit for Three Weeks: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 65C-7202. Unpublished study pr epared by Research Triangle Institute. 160 p. {870.3200}

44678000 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Environmental Fate and Residue Chemistry Data in Support of the Reregistrati on of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik 15G Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44678001 Norris, F.; Pickrell, S. (1998) Aldicarb: Mobility in Soil After Application to Florida Ridge Soils Under the Best Management Plan: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 96T09666: 45640: 95-119-001. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company, and HydroScience, Inc. 1917 p.

44699600 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Submission of Toxicity, and Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

44699601 Goldman, L.; Beller, M.; Jackson, R. (1990) Aldicarb food poisonings in California, 1985- 1988: toxicity estimates for humans. Archives of Environmental Health 45(3): 141-147.

44699602 Goldman, L.; Smith, D.; Neutra, R. et al. (1990) Pesticide food poisoning from contaminated watermelons in California, 1985 (Aldicarb). Ar chives of Environmental Health 45(4): 229-

236.

44699603 Hirsch, G.; Mori, B.; Morgan, B. et al. (1987) Report of illnesses caused by aldicarbcontaminated cucumbers. Food Additives and Contaminants 5(2): 155-160.

44719300 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1998) Submission of Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide, and Temik Brand 15G CP Aldi carb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44719301 Barraj, L.; Watters, J. (1998) Assessment of the Potential Acute Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Food and Water: Lab Project Number: ALDICARB 98-02. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 99 p.

44734900 Rhone-Poulenc AG Company (1999) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik 15G Grit. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44734901 Tyl, R.; Ross, W.; Myers, C. (1998) Asse ssment of Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats Following Topical Application of Temik 15G for Three Weeks: Amended Final Report: LabProject Number: 65C-7202: RT98-GRIT: RTI-671. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc Ag Company. 164 p. {OPPTS 870.3200}

44845100 Carbamate Market Basket Survey Task Force (1999) Submi ssion of Residue Chemistry Data in Support of the Registration of Carbamate. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44845101 Carringer, S. (1999) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket Survey: Interim Study Report: Lab Project Number: TCI-99-001: CARDC 1336: ML98-0768-CMB. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. and Morse Laboratories, Inc. 471 p.

44847400 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1999) Submission of Product Chemistry, Toxicity, Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in Support of the Petition for Tolerance of Aldicarb in/on

Bananas. Transmittal of 5 Studies.

### Page 173 of 191 44847401 Helfant, L. (1999) Product Chemistry: Banana In-Plant System: Lab Project Number: 98005LJH. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. 58 p. {OPPTS 830.1550, 830.1620, 830.1670, 830.1800, 830.6302, 830.6304, 830.6315, 830.7300, 830.7000}

44847402 Carringer, S. (1998) Temik 15 GG: Magnitude of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana RAC from Stem Injection Treatment (Central and South America): Final Study Report: Lab Project Number: 97T112971: 45655: 12971-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. and McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 417 p. {OPPTS 860.1500}

44847403 Carringer, S. (1998) Temik 15 GG: Magnitude of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana Processed Fractions from Stem Injection Treatme nt (Central and South America): Lab Project Number: 97TI13621: 45656: 13621-01. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. and McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 268 p.

44847404 Szuter, S. (1998) Aldicarb: Storage Stability of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana RAC Pulp

and Peel and the Processed Fractions of Puree and Chips: Interim Study Report: Lab Project Number: MK12-97: 90021. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Co. and McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 327 p. {OPPTS 860.1380}

44847405 Barraj, L. (1999) Assessment of the Potential Acute Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Water and Foods, Including Bananas: Lab Project Number: 99-01. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 118 p.

44860100 Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company (1999) Submission of Reduced-Risk Pesticide Rationale for Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44860101 Aldridge, K.; Ortego, L.; Rieth, J. et al. (1999) Reduced Risk and Organophosphate (OP) Replacement Rationale for Aldicar b Use on Bananas-the Banana In-Plant System: Lab Project Number: AS-07-99. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 251 p.

44929700 Carbamate Market Basket Survey Task Force (1999) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Registrations of the Aldicarb, Carbaryl, Methomyl, Oxamyl, and Thiodicarb Containing Products Temik 15G CP, Temik 15G Lock'n Load, Temik 15G Lock'n Load-CA, Temik 15G NW, Sevin 4F, Sevin 80WSP, Sevin XLR Plus, Lannate LV, Lannate SP, Vydate C-LV, Vydate L, and Larvin 3.2. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44929701 Carringer, S. (1999) Carbamate Insecticid e Market Basket Survey: Interim Study ReportNo.2: Lab Project Number: TCI-99-001: ML98-0768-CMB: TCI-99-001/CARDC 133. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc.; Morse Laboratories, Inc.; Colorado Analytical Research and Develo pment Corporation. 546 p.

44985600 Carbamate Market Basket Survey Task Force (1999) Submi ssion of Residue Chemistry Data in Support of the Reregistration of Carbamate Containing Products Temik 15G, 15G Lock'n Load, 15G Lock'n Load and 15G NW, Sevin 4F, 80WSP and XLR Plus, Lannate LV and SP, Vydate C-LV and L and Larvin 3.2. Transmittal of 1 Study.

44985601 Carringer, S. (1999) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket Survey: In terim Report-No. 3: Lab Project Number: TCI-99-001. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc., and Morse Laboratories, Inc. 642 p.

45068600 U.S. EPA (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Registration of Aldicarb and Methamidophos. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45068601 Moser, V. (1999) Comparison of Aldicarb and Methamidophos Neurotoxicity at Different Ages in the Rat: Behavior and Biochemical Parameters. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 157:94-106.

### Page 174 of 191 45068700 U.S. EPA (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Registration of Aldicarb and Methamidophos. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45068701 U.S. EPA (1999) Letters to the Editor. Toxi cology and Applied Pharmacology 161:302-305.

45079700 Aventis CropSciences (2000) Submission of Product Chemistry, and Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Citrus Only, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potatoes Only, and Temik Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of

6 Studies.

45079701 Tobia, A. (2000) Aldicarb: Absence of Justification for Requiring a FQPA Factor for Aldicarb: Toxicology. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 54 p.

45079702 Tobia, A. (2000) Aldicarb: Response to FIFRA SAP Report of February, 1999: Toxicology. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 31 p.

45079703 Lunchick, C.; Tobia, A. (2000) Rebuttal to the Aldicarb Data Evaluation Record for the 21- Day Dermal Toxicity Study Assessment of Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats Following Topical Applications of Temik 15G Grit for Three Weeks MRID# 44636101. And Rebuttal to EPA 10/01/99 Review of: Additional Aldicarb 5 Day Rat Dermal Toxicity Study Protocol (D259834 Aldicarb (098301)): Lab Project Number: 01ALD00/ADVENTIS: D259834 ALDICARB: 098301. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 24 p.

45079704 Tyl, R.; Ross, W.; Myers, C. (2000) Asse ssment of Cholinesterase Activity in CD Rats Following Topical Applications of Temik 15G Grit for One Week: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 65C-07594: RTI-749. Unpublished study pr epared by Research Triangle Institute. 128 p. {OPPTS 870.3200}

45079705 Tyl, R.; Anderson, S. (2000) The Toxicokine tics of Peripheral Cholinesterase Inhibition from Orally Administered Aldicarb in Adult Male CD Rats: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 65C-07532-100: 65C-07532-200: RTI-726. Unpublished study prepared by Research Triangle Institute. 108 p. {OPPTS 870.8500}

45079706 Linchick, C.; Powell, G. (2000) Temik Brand 15G-Quality Control Data on Dust Control of Gypsum and Grit Formulations: Lab Project Number: 02ALD00/AVENTIS. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis Crop Science. 101 p.

45150700 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Registration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45150701 Moser, V. (1999) Aldicarb Replication Study. Unpublished study prepared by US EPA,

National Health and Environmental Effects Research Lab. 403 p.

45164701 Carringer, S. (2000) Carbamate Insecticide Market Basket Survey: Final Report: Lab Project Number: TCI-99-001: METH-118: 98-03. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. and Morse Laboratories. 3359 p.

45167200 Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Ethoprop. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45167201 Urtizberea, M. (1999) Worker Exposure Study During Application in Banana Plantation with Temik 10G: Lab Project Number: SA 98337: RPS/ALD/98072. Unpublished study prepared by ADME Bioanalyses. 156 p. {OPPTS 875.1000}

### Page 175 of 191 45178000 Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

45178001 Ramanarayanan, T. (2000) Kinetics Modelin g of Degradation of Aldicarb and its Metabolites in Anaerobic Aquatic Condition: Lab Project Number: B002970. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 30 p.

45178002 Holmsen, J. (2000) Response to EPA Aldicarb Data Evaluation Record 2, Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism of (carbon-14) Aldicarb (Agency/EFED Review dated May 18, 2000): Lab Project Number: B002980. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 21 p.

45181800 Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Product Chemistry Data in Support of the Petition

for Tolerance of Aldicarb in/on Bananas. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

45181801 Szuter, S. (2000) Aldicarb: Storage Stability of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana RAC Pulp

and Peel and the Processed Fractions of Puree and Chips: Final Report: Lab Project Number: MK12-97. Unpublished study prepared by McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 415 p. {OPPTS 860.1380}

45181802 Carringers, S. (2000) TEMIK 15GC: Magnitude of Total Aldicarb Residues in Banana RAC from Stump Implant Treatment, Year 2 (Centr al and South America): Final Report: Lab Project Number: 97T15173: B002854: 15173-01. Unpublished study prepared by McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 312 p. {OPPTS 860.1500}

45181803 Gough, S. (2000) Aldicarb/Banana/ Residue Decline/ 1998-99: Final Study Report: Lab Project Number: 46028: 98T16299: 16299-01. Unpublished study prepared by McKenzie Laboratories, Inc. 223 p.

45185000 Aventis CropScience (2000) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45185001 Weiler, M. (2000) Addendum to Developmental Neurotoxicity Study with Aldicarb in Rats: Lab Project Number: 03ALD000/AVENTIS. Unpublished study prepared by Covance Laboratories, Inc. 413 p. {OPPTS 870.6300}

45205500 Aventis CropScience. (2000) Submission of Exposure Data in Support of the Petition for Tolerance of Aldicarb in/on Bananas. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45205501 Vergnon, J. (2000) Worker Exposure Study During Application in Banana Plantation with Aldicarb Banana In-Plant System Sachets: Lab Project Number: RPS/ALD/99051: 99011 HI. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis Cropscience. 176 p.

45433200 FIFRA Environmental Model Validation Task Force (2001) Submission of Exposure Assessment Data in Support of the Validation of PRZM. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45433201 Jones, R.; Russell, M. (2001) FIFRA E nvironmental Model Validation Task Force: Final Report. Unpublished study prepared by FIFRA Environmental Model Validation Task Force. 768 p.

45451400 Aventis CropSciecne (2001) Submission of Toxicity, Risk Assessment and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45451401 Tobia, A. (2001) Scientific Response to Is sues Raised in the EPA's February 8, 2001 HED HIARC Report on the Re-Evaluation of Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 289 p.

### Page 176 of 191 45467500 Aventis CropScience (2001) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45467501 Tyl, R. (2000) Responses to: Health Effects Division Data Evaluation Records (DER No. 013268: Aldicarb, TEMIK 15G Grit 21-Day Dermal Toxicity Study and DER 014169: Aldicarb, TEMIK 15G Grit 5-Day Dermal Toxicity Study): Lab Project Number: 01GSP2001. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 19 p.

45529100 Aventis CropScience (2001) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45529101 Hodges, L. (2001) Review of the Rere gistration Eligibility Decision Draft Chapter on Environmental Fate and Ecological Effects: Aldicarb. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 94 p.

45592100 Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Pesticide Use, Environmental Fate, Toxicity and Product Chemistry Data in Support of the Rere gistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Citrus Only, and Temik Brand

15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potato. Transmittal of 17 Studies.

45592101 Scarborough, T. (2001) 1999-2000 TEMIK User Studies. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 78 p.

45592102 McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D. (1987) Aldicarb Vapor Pressure: Lab Project Number: 40052: 803P15. Unpublished study prepared by Rhone-Poulenc Ag Company. 9 p.

45592103 McDaniel, R.; Weiler, D. (1987) Design and Validation of High Flow Apparatus for VaporPressure Determinations: Lab Project Number: 40182. Unpublished study prepared by RhonePoulenc, Inc. 20 p.

45592106 Allan, J. (2001) The Route and Rate of Degradation of (s-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb in Two Soils under Laboratory Aerobic Conditions at 25 (Degrees Celcius): Interim Report: Lab Project Number: 601YT: B003572. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 120

p.

45592107 Jesudason, P. (2001) Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism of (S-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb Under Laboratory Conditions at 25 Degrees Celcius: Lab Project Number: 602YT: B003556. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience and AGVISE Laboratories, Inc. 127 p.

45592200 US EPA (2002) Submission of Exposure, Risk, Pesticide Use, Toxicity, Safety, Residue, and

Environmental Fate Data. Transmittal of 50 Studies.

45592235 People, S.; Maddy, K.; Smith, C. (1978) Occupational Exposure to Temik (Aldicarb) as Reported by California Physicians for 1974-1976. Veterinary and Human Toxicology 20:321-

324.

45602900 Aventis Cropscience (2002) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Citrus Only, Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide and Temik Brand 15G NW

Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potato. Transmittal of 4 of 21 Studies.

45602901 Lemley, A.; Zhong, W. (1983) Kinetics of Aqueous Base and Acid Hydrolysis of Aldicarb,

Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. Journal of Environmental Science Health B18(2):189-206.

### Page 177 of 191 45602902 Hansen, J.; Spiegel, M. (1983) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2:147-153.

45602903 Lemley, A.; Zhong, W. (1984) Hydrolysis Studies of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone at Parts per billion Levels in Aqueous Mediums. Journal Agricultural Food Chemistry 32:714-719.

45602904 Lightfoot, E.; Thorne, P.; Jones, R. et al. (1987) Laboratory Studies on Mechanisms for the Degradation of Aldicarb, Aldicarb Sulfoxide and Aldicarb Sulfone. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 6:377-394.

45632500 Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Product Chemistry Data in Support of the Amended Registration of TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, TEMIK Brand 15G CP Aldicarb Pesticide, TEMIK Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Sale and Use in California Only

and TEMIK Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 4 Studies.

45632501 Helfant, L. (2002) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Product Chemistry: Lab Project Number: 021802LJH: B003770. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 33 p. {OPPTS 830.1550, 830.1650}

45649100 Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Product Chemistry Data in Support of the Registration of TEMIK Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide and TEMIK Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide for Agricultural Use. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45649101 Helfant, L. (2002) TEMIK Brand 10G Aldicarb Pesticide Product Chemistry: Lab Project Number: 040102LJH. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 21 p. {OPPTS 830.1550 and 830.1650}

45739800 Aventis CropScience (2002) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Citrus Only, Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide and Temik Brand 15G NW

Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potatoe. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

45739801 Allan, J. (2002) The Route and Rate of Degradation of (S-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb in 2 Soils Under Laboratory Aerobic Conditions at 25 Degrees C: Final Report: Lab Project Number: 601YT: B003965. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 167 p.

45739802 Allan, J. (2002) The Route and Rate of Degradation of (S-Methyl-(Carbon 14))-Aldicarb Sulfone in 2 Soils Under Laboratory Aerobic Conditions at 25 Degrees C: Lab Project Number: 607YT: B003573. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 101 p.

45906800 Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for Agriculture Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Citrus Only, Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Sale and Use in California Only, Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potatoes. Transmittal of 1 Study.

45906801 Allan, J. (2002) The Route and Rate of Degradation of (S-Methyl-Carbon 14)-Aldicarb Sulfone in Two Soils Under Laboratory Aerobic Conditions at 25 (Degrees) C (Amended Report to Study 607YT, Document Number B003573): Lab Project Number: B004162: 607YT: B003573. Unpublished study prepared by Aventis CropScience. 102 p.

46065200 Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Product Chemistry, Risk and Exposure Data in Support of the Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

### Page 178 of 191 46065201 Helfant, L.; Ligon, R. (2003) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Product Chemistry. Project Number: PC030417, B004379, CM/62. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 82 p.

46065203 Fish, J. (2003) Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide Formulation Development Importance of Formulation on Application Uniformity, Worker Safety and Customer Satisfaction. Project Number: JDF2003/1. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 12 p.

46065204 Ligon, R. (2001) Three Year Storage Evaluation of Temik 15 G Gypsum. Project Number: WOODBINE/061501. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 25 p.

46100300 Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Product Chemistry Data in Support of the Registration of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46100301 Lunchick, C. (2003) Bayer CropScience Comments Regarding Dust Content of Bayer Brand Aldicarb Formulations and Its Relationship to Operator Exposure Potential. Project Number: WOODBINE/08180, CL072003. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 68 p.

46131000 Bayer CropScience (2003) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Products Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide, Temik 10% Granular Aldicarb Pesticide for Agricultural Use, Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide for Citrus Use, Temik

Brand 15G Aldicarb for Sale and Use in Calif ornia Only, and Temik Brand 15G NW Aldicarb Pesticide for Use on Potatoe. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46131001 Cameron, A. (2003) Supple mentary Report to: A Safety and Tolerability Study of Aldicarb at Various Dose Levels in Healthy Male and Fema le Volunteers: Final Report. Project Number: 003237, SOP/REC/030. Unpublished study prepared by Inveresk Research International and BCG (Europe) Ltd. 136 p.

46340600 Bayer CropScience LP (2004) Submission of Residue, Risk and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46340601 Barraj, L.; Tomerlin, J.; Daniels, C. (2 001) Assessment of the Potential Acute Dietary Exposure to Aldicarb in Water and Foods, Including Bananas. Project Number: ALDICARB/01/01, 12971/01, 12971/02. Unpublished study prepared by Novigen Sciences, Inc. 168 p.

46427600 Bayer CropScience LP (2004) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Registration of Carbamate Products. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46427601 Pandian, M. (2004) USDA Pesticide Data Program (PDP) Monitoring Data for Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment. Project Number: DAL119/04. Unpublished study prepared by Infoscientific.Com, Inc. 86 p.

46466400 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46466401 Movassaghi, S.; Daussin, S.; Hanzas, J. (2005) Surface Water Monitoring for Residues of Aldicarb in High Use Areas in the United St ates: Final Study Repo rt. Project Number: 00T30605, B004894. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer Corp. and Agvise Inc. 1553 p.

46542800 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

### Page 179 of 191 46542802 Hodges, L. (2005) Review of the Prelim inary Environmental Fate and Ecological Effects (EFED) Risk Assessment for the Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 66 p.

46571300 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46571301 U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Cancer Institute (1979) Bioassay of Aldicarb for Possible Carcinogenicity: NCI/CG/TR/136. Bethesda, MD: US National Institutes of Health. 119 p. NIH Publication no. 79-1391.

46579100 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb and Isoproturon. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

46579101 Urtizberea, M. (1999) Worker Loader and Applicator Exposure Study During Application in Citrus Plantation with Temik 10G. Project Number: R009475, SA/98148. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience. 175 p.

46613000 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46613001 Tobia, A. (2005) Bayer Cropscience Respon se to EPA Request for Clarification Concerning the 1992 Wyld et al. Aldicarb Study w ith Human Volunteers. Project Number: BCS/003237/1, 003237. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 59 p.

46618000 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46618001 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997) NHEERL/EPA Study with Aldicarb: Initial Measurements of ChE Activity in Rat Brain (AE1). Unpublished study. 2 p.

46627800 Bayer CropScience (2005) Submission of Exposure, Risk and Safety Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 3 Studies.

46627801 Hodges, L. (2005) Response to the Phase 3 Environmental Fate and Ecological Effects (EFED) Risk Assessment for the Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 70 p.

46627802 Hall, L.; Shaw, R.; Fish, J.; et. al. (2005) Temik 15G Brand Aldicarb: Product Usage and Methods of Application: Revised Version. Project Number: G201361. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 34 p.

46627803 Hovis, A. (2005) Temik Brand Aldicarb Pesticide Product Stewardship Review. Project Number: AH81005. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 13 p.

46638100 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Risk and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46638101 Barraj, L.; Daniels, C. (2004) Drinking Water Consumption Survey. Project Number: 04/01, 8/000/B0F0/0904/0001. Unpublished study prepared by Exponent. 40 p.

46655400 Bayer CropScience LP (2005) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

### Page 180 of 191 46655401 Moore, D.; Thompson, R.; Purbrick, S. (2005) Problem Formulation for the Refined Aquatic Risk Assessment of Aldicarb. Project Number: 201373, 88380. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental Inc. 31 p.

46655402 Moore, D.; Purbrick, S.; Thompson, R. (2005) Problem Formulation for the Refined Wildlife Risk Assessment of Aldicarb. Project Number: 201374, 88380. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental Inc. 37 p.

46765100 Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co. (1980) Submission of Toxicity Data in Support of the Registration of Temik 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

46765101 Godek, E.; Dolak, M.; Matthews, R.; et. al. (1980) Ames Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test: Aldicarb Sulfoxide. Project Number: PH/301/UC/002/80. Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Laboratories. 14 p.

46765102 Godek, E.; Dolak, M.; Matthews, R.; et. al. (1980) Ames Salmonella/Microsome Plate Test: Aldicarb Sulfone. Project Number: PH/301/UC/003/80. Unpublished study prepared by Pharmakon Laboratories. 14 p.

46792600 Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Pesticide Use in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik 15G. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46792601 Hall, L. (2006) Temik Brand 15G Aldicab Pesticide Crop and Geographical Usage Information (A Reference Provided for an Endangered Species Assessment of Aldicarb). Project Number: G201481. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Cropscience LP. 76 p.

46793700 Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.

Transmittal of 5 Studies.

46793701 Jones, R.; Ramanarayanan, T. (2006) Temik Brand15G Aldicarb Pesticide: Summary of Five Retrospective Ground Water Monitoring Studies Conducted for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in the Pacific Northwest, California, Texas, Mississippi Delta and the Southeast Regions fo the United States in 2005. Project Number: RAVY010. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. 27 p.

46793702 Freeseman, P.; Jones, R.; Lee, R.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in the Pacific Nothwest: (Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb). Project Number: RAAVY005, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 1033 p.

46793704 Mosier, D.; Jones, R.; Nandihalli, U.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in Texas: (Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide). Project Number: RAAVY007, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 749 p.

46793705 Wyatt, D.; Jones, R.; Nandihalli, U.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in the Mississippi Delta Region: (Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide). Project Number: RAAVY008, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 690 p.

46793706 Lee, R.; Jones, R.; Wyatt, D.; et. al. (2006) A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study for Aldicarb and its Metabolites in the Southeastern United States. Project Number: RAAVY009, YT/01/01, B003390. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 2955 p.

### Page 181 of 191 46796100 Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Toxicity, Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide.

Transmittal of 3 Studies.

46796101 Ramanarayanan, T. (2006) Refined Aquatic Ecological Exposure Assessment for Total Carbamate Residues From Aldicarb. Project Number: MEAVY006. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. 75 p.

46796102 Moore, D.; Thompson, R.; Purbrick, S. (2006) Refined Aquatic Risk Assessment for Aldicarb. Project Number: 201482. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental Inc. 234 p.

46796103 Moore, D.; Purbrick, S.; Teed, R.; et. al. (2006) Refined Wildlife Risk Assessment for Aldicarb. Project Number: 201483, 88390. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental Inc. 493 p.

46796600 Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Reregistration Aldicarb. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

46796601 Young, B.; Mihlan, G.; Lantz, J.; et. al . (2006) CARES-compatible Dietary Minute Module (DMM) Version 2.2 Build 7.8.9 (3/14/06). Project Number: G201503. Unpublished study prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. and Infoscientific.Com. 38 p.

46796602 Kelly, I.; Lantz, J.; Mihlan, G.; et. al. (2006) CARES-compatible Dietary Minute Module (DMM) Version 2.2 Build 7.8.9 (3/14/2006): Technical Manual. Project Number: G201504. Unpublished study prepared by Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 27 p.

46819500 Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Environmental Fate Data in Support of the Reregistration of the Aldicarb Containing Product Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46819501 Lenz, M.; Jones, R.; Wyatt, D.; et. al. ( 2006) A Retrospective Groundwater Monitoring Study

for Aldicarb and Its Metabolites in California. Project Number: RAAVY006, 004/11333/00, YT/01/01. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Corp. and LFR Levine-Fricke, Inc. 767 p.

46834000 Interregional Research Project No. 4 (2006) Submission of Fate Data in Support of the Registration of Citrus Fruits Group 10. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46834001 Chen, H. (2006) Crop Grouping Petition Citrus Fruits Group 10, Technical Amendment to 40 CFR 180.41 (c)(10) and 180.1 (h). Unpublished study prepared by Interregional Research Project No. 4 and U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 303 p.

46857900 Interregional Research Project No 4 (2006) Submission of Residue Data. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46857901 Chen, H. (2006) Crop Grouping Petition Pome Fruit Group 11, Technical Amendment. Project Number: A/27200/16/06. Unpublished study prepared by Interregional Research Project No. 4. 390 p.

46873100 Bayer CropScience LP (2006) Submission of Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb Product Containing Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46873101 Best, L.; Brewer, L.; Klaine, S.; et. al. (2006) Refined Ecological Risk Assessment for Aldicarb Expert Peer Review Panel Proce ss and Comments. Project Number: EPR/32306. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 10 p.

### Page 182 of 191 46891400 Bayer CropScience (2006) Submission of Risk and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 5 studies.

46891401 Tobia, A.; Blacker, A. (2006) Bayer Crop Science's Assessment and Rebuttal of the Reference Dose as Proposed by EPA in the Health Effe cts Division Revised Preliminary Human Helath

Risk Assessment for Aldicarb Issued on May 12, 2006. Project Number: G201557. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 16 p.

46891402 Lantz, J.; Young, B.; Jones, R.; *et. al. (2006) Aldicarb Acute Dietary Risk Assessment Including Food and Drinking Water Volume 1. Project Number: G201350. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 219 p.

46891403 Kelly, I.; Lantz, J.; Mihlan, G.; *et. al . (2006) Incorporating Rapid Reversibility into the Dietary Risk Assessment for Aldicarb. Project Number: G201550. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 33 p.

46891405 Hall, L. (2006) The Benefits to Agriculture of Temik Brand 15G Aldicarb Pesticide. Project Number: G201529. 126 p.

46891406 Fischer, D.; Ramanarayanan, T.; Jones, R. (2006) Response to the EPA Environmental Risk Assessment for the Aldicarb Reregistration Eligibility Decision. Project Number: G201560. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer Crop Science LP. 23 p.

46898900 Bayer CropScience (2006) Submission of Efficacy Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

46898901 Blacker, A.; Jones, R.; Kelly, I.; et. al.; (2006) Aldicarb: Human Hea lth Risk Assessment for Use on Currently Registered and Pending Registrations as of May 2006. Project Number: G201555. Unpublished study prepared by Bayer CropScience LP. 86 p.

47061700 Interregional Research Project NO.4. (2007) Submission of Residue Data in Support of the Petition for Tolerance of Stone Fruits Group. Transmittal of 1 Study.

47061701 Chen, H. Crop Grouping Petition-Stone Fruit Group 12, Technical Amendment To 40 CFR 180.41 (C) 12 And 180.1 (h). Project Number: 09896. Unpublished study prepared by Interregional Research Project No. 4. 304 p.

47124600 Bayer CropScience (2007) Submission of Risk and Exposure Data in Support of the Reregistration of Aldicarb. Transmittal of 1 Study.

47124601 Fisher, D.; Ramanarayanan, T.; Moore, D.; et. al.; (2007) Effects Determination for California Red-Legged Frog Potentially Exposed to Aldicarb. Project Number: 88380, 201692. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental, Inc. 138 p.

47164600 Croplife America (2007) Submission of Environmental Fate and Exposure and Risk Data in Support of the Preservation of the California Red Legged Frog. Transmittal of 2 Studies.

47164601 Moore, D.; Breton, R.; Rodney, S.; et. al.; (2007) Generic Problem Formulation for California Red-Legged Frog. Project Number: 89320, 05232007. Unpublished study prepared by Cantox Environmental Inc. 87 p.

47164602 Holmes, C.; Vamshi, R. (2007) Data and Methodology Used for Spatial Analysis of California Red Legged Frog Observations and Proximate Land Cover Ch aracteristics. Project Number: 3152007, WEI/252/03. Unpublished study prepared by Waterborne Environmental, Inc. (WEI). 19 p.

### Page 183 of 191 Appendix E. Generic Data Call-In (GDCI)

Note that a complete generic DCI, with al l pertinent instructions, will be sent to registrants under separate cover.

### Page 184 of 191 Appendix F. Product-Specific Data Call-In (PDCI)

Note that a complete product-specific DCI, w ith all pertinent instruct ions, will be sent to registrants under separate cover.

### Page 185 of 191 Appendix G. EPA’s Batching of Aldicarb Products for Meeting Data Requirements for Reregistration

In an effort to reduce the time, resources and number of animals needed to fulfill the acute toxicity data requirements for re registration of produc ts containing ALDICARB as the active ingredient, the Agency has batched products which can be considered similar for purposes of acute toxicity. Factor s considered in the sorting process include each product's active and inert ingredients (i dentity, percent composition and biological activity), type of formulation (e.g., emulsifi able concentrate, aerosol, wettable powder, granular, etc.), and labeling (e.g., signal wo rd, use classification, precautionary labeling, etc.). Note that the Agency is not descri bing batched products as "substantially similar" since some products within a batch may not be considered chemically similar or have identical use patterns.

Using available information, batching has been accomplished by the process described in the preceding paragraph. Notw ith-standing the batching process, the Agency reserves the right to require, at any time, acute toxicity data for an individual product

should the need arise.

Registrants of products within a batch may choose to cooperatively generate, submit or cite a single battery of six acut e toxicological studies to represent all the products within that batch. It is the registrant s' option to participate in the process with all other registrants, only some of the other regi strants, or only their own products within a batch, or to generate all th e required acute toxicological studies for each of their own products. If a registrant chooses to generate the data for a batch, he/she must use one of the products within the batch as the test material. If a re gistrant chooses to rely upon previously submitted acute toxicity data, he/she may do so provided that the data base is complete and valid by today's standards (see acceptance criteria attached), the formulation tested is considered by EPA to be similar for acute toxicity, and the formulation has not been significantly alte red since submission and acceptance of the acute toxicity data. Regardless of whether ne w data is generated or existing data is referenced, registrants must clearly identif y the test material by EPA Registration

Number. If more than one confidential stat ement of formula (CSF) exists for a product, the registrant must indicate the formul ation actually tested by identifying the corresponding CSF.

In deciding how to meet the product specifi c data requirements, registrants must follow the directions given in the Data Call -In Notice and its attachments appended to the RED. The DCI Notice contains two respons e forms which are to be completed and submitted to the Agency within 90 days of receipt. The first form, "Data Call-In Response," asks whether the registrant will meet the data requirements for each product. The second form, "Requirements Status and Registrant's Response," lists the product specific data required for each product, including the standard six acute toxicity tests. A registrant who wishes to participate in a batch must decide whether he/she will provide the data or depend on someone else to do so. If a registrant supplies the data to support a batch of products, he/she must select one of the following options: Developing Data

### Page 186 of 191 (Option 1), Submitting an Existing Study (O ption 4), Upgrading an Existing Study (Option 5) or Citing an Existing Study (Opti on 6). If a registrant depends on another's data, he/she must choose among: Cost Sharing (Option 2), Offers to Cost Share (Option 3) or Citing an Existing Study (O ption 6). If a registrant does not want to participate in a batch, the choices are Options 1, 4, 5 or 6. However, a registrant should know that choosing not to participate in a batch does not preclude other registra nts in the batch from citing his/her studies and offering to cost share (Option 3) those studies.

Six products were found which contain Aldicarb as the active ingred ient. These products have been placed into two batches in accordan ce with the active and inert ingredients and type of formulation.

Batching Instructions :

NOTE: The technical acute toxicity values included in this document are for informational purposes only. The data suppor ting these values may or may not meet the current acceptance criteria.

Batch 1 EPA Reg. No. Percent Active Ingredient

264-330 15.0

264-417 15.0

264-426 15.0

264-523 15.0

Batch 2 EPA Reg. No. Percent Active Ingredient

264-322 10.0

264-331 10.0

### Page 187 of 191 Appendix H. List of Available Related Documents and Electronically Available

Forms

Pesticide Registration Forms are availabl e at the following EPA internet site : http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/.

Pesticide Registration Forms (These forms ar e in PDF format and require the Acrobat reader)

Instructions:

1. Print out and complete the forms. (Note: Form numbers that are bolded can be filled out on your computer then printed.)

2. The completed form(s) should be submitted in hardcopy in accord with the existing policy.

3. Mail the forms, along with any additional documents necessary to comply with EPA regulations covering your request, to the following address for the Document Processing Desk:

Document Processing Desk (distribution code)* Office of Pesticide Programs (7504P) Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460-0001

* Distribution Codes are as follows: (APPL) Application for product registration (AMEND) Amendment to existing registration (CAN) Voluntary Cancellation (EUP) Experimental Use Permit (DIST) Supplemental Distributor Registration (SLN) Special Local Need (NEWCO) Request for new company number (NOTIF) Notification (PETN) Petition for Tolerance (XFER) Product Transfer

DO NOT fax or e-mail any form containing “Confidential Business Information” or

“Sensitive Information.”

If you have any problems accessing these forms, please contact Nicole Williams at (703) 308-5551 or by e-mail at williams.nicole@epamail.epa.gov . If you want these forms mailed or faxed to you, please contact Lois White, white.lois@epa.gov or Floyd Gayles, gayles.floyd@epa.gov

.

If you have any questions concerning how to complete these forms, please contact OPP’s ombudsperson for conventional pesticide products: Linda Arrington, (703) 305-5446

### Page 188 of 191 The following Agency Pesticide Registrati on Forms are currently available via the Internet at the following locations:

8570-1 Application for Pesticide Registration/Amendment http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-1.pdf

8570-4 Confidential Statement of Formula http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-4.pdf

8570-5 Notice of Supplemental Registration of Distribution of a Registered Pesticide

Product http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-5.pdf

8570-17 Application for an Experimental Use

Permit http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-17.pdf

8570-25 Application for/Notification of State Registration of a Pesticide To Meet a Special Local Need http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-25.pdf

8570-27 Formulator's Exemption Statement http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-27.pdf

8570-28 Certification of Compliance with Data Gap Procedures http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-28.pdf

8570-30 Pesticide Registration Maintenance Fee Filing http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-30.pdf

8570-32 Certification of A ttempt to Enter into an Agreement with other Registrants for Development of Data http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570-32.pdf

8570-34 Certification with Respect to Citations of Data (in PR Notice 98-5) http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices/pr98- 5.pdf

8570-35 Data Matrix (in PR Notice 98-5) http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices/pr98- 5.pdf

8570-36 Summary of the Physical/Chemical Properties (in PR Notice 98-1) http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices/pr98- 1.pdf

8570-37 Self-Certification Statement for the Physical/Chemical Properties (in PR Notice 98-1) http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices/pr98- 1.pdf

### Page 189 of 191 Pesticide Registration Kit http:// www.epa.gov/pesticides/registrationkit/

Dear Registrant:

For your convenience, we have assemb led an on-line registration kit which contains the following pertinent forms and in formation needed to register a pesticide product with the U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency's Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP):

1. The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) as Amended by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996.

2. Pesticide Registration (PR) Notices

a. 83-3 Label Improvement Program-Storage and Disposal Statements b. 84-1 Clarification of Label Improvement Program

c. 86-5 Standard Format for Data Submitted under FIFRA d. 87-1 Label Improvement Program for Pesticides Applie d through Irrigation Systems (Chemigation) e. 87-6 Inert Ingredients in Pes ticide Products Policy Statement f. 90-1 Inert Ingredients in Pesticid e Products; Revised Policy Statement g. 95-2 Notifications, Non-notifications , and Minor Formulation Amendments h. 98-1 Self Certification of Product Chemistry Data with Attachments (This document is in PDF format and requires the Acrobat reader.)

Other PR Notices can be found at http://www.epa.gov/opppmsd1/PR_Notices.

3. Pesticide Product Registration Application Forms (These forms are in PDF format and will require the Acrobat reader.)

a. EPA Form No. 8570-1, Application for Pesticide Registration/Amendment b. EPA Form No. 8570-4, Confidential Statement of Formula c. EPA Form No. 8570-27, Formulator's Exemption Statement d. EPA Form No. 8570-34, Certification w ith Respect to Citations of Data e. EPA Form No. 8570-35, Data Matrix

4. General Pesticide Information (Some of these forms are in PDF format and will require the Acrobat reader.)

a. Registration Division Personnel Contact List b. Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD) Contacts

c. Antimicrobials Division Organiza tional Structure/ Contact List d. 53 F.R. 15952, Pesticide Registra tion Procedures; Pesticide Data Requirements (PDF format)

e. 40 CFR Part 156, Labeling Requirements for Pesticides and Devices (PDF format) f. 40 CFR Part 158, Data Requirements for Registration (PDF format)

g. 50 F.R. 48833, Disclosure of Reviews of Pesticide Data (November 27, 1985)

### Page 190 of 191 Before submitting your application for regi stration, you may wish to consult some

additional sources of information. These include:

1. The Office of Pesticide Programs' Web Site

2. The booklet "General Information on Applyi ng for Registration of Pesticides in the United States", PB92-221811, availa ble through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) at the following address:

National Technical Information Service (NTIS) 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161

The telephone number for NTIS is (703) 605-6000. Please note that EPA is currently in the process of updating this booklet to re flect the changes in the registration program resulting from the passage of the FQPA and the reorganization of the Office of Pesticid e Programs. We anticipate that this publication will become availabl e during the Fall of 1998.

3. The National Pesticide Information Retrieval System (NPIRS) of Purdue University's Center for Environmental and Regulatory Information Systems. This service does charge a fee for subscriptions and custom searches. You can contact NPIRS by telephone at (765) 494-6614 or through their website.

4. The National Pesticide Telecommunications Network (NPTN) can provide information on active ingredients, uses, t oxicology, and chemistry of pesticides. You can contact NPTN by telephone at ( 800) 858-7378 or through their website: http://npic.orst.edu

The Agency will return a notice of receipt of an application for registration or amended registration, experimental use pe rmit, or amendment to a petition if the applicant or petitioner encl oses with his submission a stamped, self-addressed postcard. The postcard must contain the following entries to be completed by

OPP:

• Date of receipt

• EPA identifying number

• Product Manager assignment

Other identifying information may be included by the applicant to link the acknowledgment of receipt to the specifi c application submitted. EPA will stamp the date of receipt and provide the EP A identifying File Symbol or petition number for the new submission. The identifying number should be used whenever you contact the Agency concerning an appl ication for registration, experimental use permit, or tolerance petition.

### Page 191 of 191 To assist us in ensuring that all data you have submitted for the chemical are properly coded and assigned to your co mpany, please include a list of all synonyms, common and trade names, comp any experimental codes, and other names which identify the chemical (including "blind" codes used when a sample was submitted for testing by commercial or academic facilities). Please provide a CAS number if one has been assigned.