alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 2020 Ohio State University Economics Fair

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Jay Hilderbran, People and Culture recruiter for the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime, attended the Ohio State University College of Arts and Sciences Economics Department Spring Career Fair Feb. 20 at the Ohio Union Complex. 

Students’ interests about DLA L&M were internships, recent graduate program, locations, mission, training opportunities, tuition assistance and the organizational culture.

Hilderbran answered questions about the careers DLA has to offer and employee benefits, flexible work schedules, fitness time and retirement plans.

More than 25 students with finance and economic majors visited the DLA booth.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Careers L&MCulture L&MDLA L&MPACER/Intern L&MResource the Enterprise L&M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HOLLY ANN CRAWFORD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 19 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1   BINGHAM CANYON CORPORATION  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Bingham Canyon Corporation (the “Company”) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: May 9, 2007 /s/ Brett D. Mayer Brett D. Mayer Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

November 18, 1942

No. 47727.

#### Protest 982595-G of Edward Hines Pacific Coast Lumber Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith, it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported and that no addition should have been made for planing, tonguing, and grooving. Protest sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Memry Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on September 26, 2005 (the Report), I, Robert P. Belcher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert P. Belcher                    
|Robert P. Belcher Chief Financial Officer



Dated: September 26, 2005



This certification is made solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Mr. Scott, 

Paula Scott <pmondoy@gmail.com> 

Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:34 PM 

Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Makani Kai Air service to Kalaupapa 

I am writing to let you know that I am very satisfied with Makani 

Kai Air service to Kalaupapa. It is important to allow this airline to 

operate this service for many reasons-one of which is that they are 

affordable and allow the residents and visiting family and friends an 

affordable way to travel. Not everyone can make the grueling 7.6 

mile round trip hike up and down that trail on the sea cliff. 

Sincerely, 

Paula Scott 

molokaigirlstudio 

1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF LIBERTY GROUP OPERATING, INC.

LIBERTY GROUP OPERATING, INC.

                 o         Liberty Group Arkansas Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Arizona Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group California Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Illinois Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Iowa Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Kansas Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Michigan Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Minnesota Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Missouri Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Nebraska Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Nevada Holdings, Inc.

                           o         Elko Daily Free Press, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group New York Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Pennsylvania Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Management Services, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Louisiana Holdings, Inc.

                           o         News Leader, Inc.

                           Plaquemine Publishing, Inc. (in process)

                 o         Liberty Group Idaho Holdings, Inc.

                           o         Magic Valley Publishing Co.

                 o         Liberty Group North Dakota Holdings, Inc.

                 o         Liberty Group Suburban Newspapers, Inc.

                 o         Mineral Daily News Tribune, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 199 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 199

 To require the obligation of certain highway funding within a 3-year 
                                period.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2011

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the obligation of certain highway funding within a 3-year 
                                period.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Use It or Lose It Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. OBLIGATION OF CERTAIN HIGHWAY FUNDING.

    (a) Definition of Earmark.--In this section, the term ``earmark'' 
means--
            (1) a congressionally directed spending item, as defined in 
        clause 5(a) of rule XLIV of the rules of the Senate for the 
        112th Congress; or
            (2) a congressional earmark, as defined in clause 9(d) of 
        rule XXI of the rules of the House of Representatives for the 
        112th Congress.
    (b) Obligation of Funding.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, funds made available from the Highway Trust Fund through 
        an earmark to carry out a highway project under title 23, 
        United States Code, shall be obligated for the earmarked 
        project by not later than 3 years after the date on which the 
        earmarked funds are first made available.
            (2) Return and redistribution.--Funds described in 
        paragraph (1) that are not obligated by the deadline specified 
        in that paragraph shall be--
                    (A) released to the State transportation department 
                of the State with jurisdiction over the original 
                recipient of the earmark; and
                    (B) redistributed by the State for expeditious use 
                for other federally approved transportation projects in 
                the State.
                                 <all>
```
FRANCISCO BANKS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2906

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 1, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County.

Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge.

Francisco Banks, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
#### MacLEOD v. KAPP et al.

Civ. 47-708.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Nov. 29, 1948.

Meadow, Mann & Clyne, of New York City (Julius J. Abeson, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Louis R. Teig, of New York City, for defendants.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Title 11 U.S.C.A. § 29, sub. e upon the ground that more than two years have elapsed' since the adjudication of bankruptcy. The trustee in bankruptcy seeks to set aside an alleged preferential transfer under Section 15 of the New York Stock Corporation Law, Consol.Laws, c. 59.

An involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against the Radiant Fur Co., Inc. on May 9, 1945, and it was adjudicated a bankrupt on May 25, 1945. This action was commenced by the filing of the summons and complaint and ,the service of a copy thereof on the defendants on October 27, *5131948, some three years and five months after the adjudication.

Section 29, sub. e of Title 11 U.S.C.A. reads in part as follows: “A receiver or trustee may, within two years subsequent to the date of adjudication or within such further period of time as the Federal or State law may permit, institute proceedings in behalf of the estate upon any claim against which the period of limitation fixed by Federal or State law had not expired at the time of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. * * * ”

In support of the motion defendants rely on the decision of the Supreme Court in Herget v. Central National Bank & Trust Co., 1945, 324 U.S. 4, 65 S.Ct. 505, 507, 89 L.Ed. 656, in which the two year statute referred to above, was enforced. However, a reading of that case reveals that it is not applicable here. The cause of action in the Herget case arose under section 60 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 96, as the Supreme Court said: “Here the only applicable law is Section 60 of the Bankruptcy Act, which generates the cause of action and which contains no time limitations as to actions brought pursuant thereto.”

And further the Court said: “Inasmuch as the federal Bankruptcy Act has created the liability and has also fixed the limitation of time for commencing actions to enforce it, *we have no occasion to consider the trustee’s arguments concerning the applicability and construction of the Illinois statutes of limitation.”*(Italics for emphasis.)

As stated above, this action was instituted under Section 15 of the New York Stock Corporation Law. And the statute of limitations applicable thereto is Section 48 of the New York Civil Practice Act' — a six year statute. Frank Shepard Co. v. Zachary P. Taylor Pub. Co., 1923, 234 N.Y. 465, 138 N.E. 409.

If the words *"or within such further period of time as the Federal or State law may permit”*are to be given any effect, they must mean that this action, based on the state statute, is to be governed by the applicable New York State statute of limitations. McBride v. Farrington, D.C., 1945, 60 F.Supp. 92, affirmed D.C., 156 F.2d 971. Consequently the action is not barred by the two year statute in the Bankruptcy Act.

Motion denied.

Settle order on notice.
Exhibit 10.1

Exhibit 10.1 - Executive Officer Compensation

     The Temecula Valley Bank ("Bank") Board of Directors, upon the
recommendation of the Executive Officer Compensation Committee, approved the
following:

     1. Annual Base Salary Changes Effective January 1, 2008

     Jim Andrews, EVP/Real Estate Manager                $220,000 to $231,000
     Frank Basirico Jr., SEVP/Chief Credit Officer       $262,500 to $275,625
     Martin E. Plourd, EVP/Chief Operating Officer       $180,000 to $189,000

     2. Mr. Basirico's bonus was changed from 60 basis points to 75 basis points
of pre-tax profits.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 19 

To restore Americans’ individual liberty by striking the Federal mandate 

to purchase insurance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. WICKER, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. BURR, Mr. COBURN, Mr. KIRK, Mr. CRAPO, 

Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. KYL, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. HUTCHISON, 

Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. COATS, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. 

ISAKSON, Mr. CORKER, and Mr. ENSIGN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To restore Americans’ individual liberty by striking the 

Federal mandate to purchase insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Liberty Res5 toration Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESTORING INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY. 

7 Sections 1501 and 1502 and subsections (a), (b), (c), 

8 and (d) of section 10106 of the Patient Protection and 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 19 IS

1 Affordable Care Act (and the amendments made by such 

2 sections and subsections) are repealed and the Internal 

3 Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered 

4 as if such provisions and amendments had never been en5 acted. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2014102EN.01000801.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/8

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Ferenc Tibor Kovács v Vas Megyei Rendőr-főkapitányság

(Case C-5/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 45 TFEU - Free movement of workers - National legislation under which a driver using a vehicle with foreign registration plates must prove the lawfulness of its use on the spot, during a police inspection, on pain of a fine))

2014/C 102/09

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Szombathelyi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ferenc Tibor Kovács

Applicant:

Defendant: Vas Megyei Rendőr-főkapitányság

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Szombathelyi Törvényszék — Interpretation of the law on non-discrimination, freedom of movement for workers and the right to a fair trial — National legislation on road traffic under which only vehicles that have administrative authorisation and registration plates granted by the national authorities may be used on the roads in the national territory, and the fulfilment of the requirements which allow a derogation from that provision may be established only during an inspection — Obligation for a person residing in Member State A, working in Member State B and having, for the purposes of travelling to his workplace, the use of a vehicle owned by his employer and bearing registration plates from Member State B, to prove during the police inspection that he is lawfully using the vehicle in Member State A — No possibility for the driver of the vehicle to provide the proof of that lawful use subsequently in an administrative procedure.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that that it precludes national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which, in principle, only vehicles that have administrative authorisation and registration plates granted by the Member State in question may be used on the roads in that Member State and a resident of that Member State who seeks to rely on a derogation from that rule, on the ground that he uses a vehicle made available to him by his employer established in another Member State, must be able to prove on the spot, during a police inspection, that he fulfils the requirements for such a derogation, as laid down by the national legislation in question, on pain of the immediate imposition of a fine equivalent to that applicable in the event of infringement of the registration requirement, without there being any possibility of an exemption from that fine.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.

1

---
No. 44379.

#### Protests 1991-K, etc., of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of tape measures similar to those the subject of Abstract 43372. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



             [BROUSSARD, POCHE, LEWIS & BREAUX, L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


As Independent Auditors, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in
this Form 10-K of American Bancorp, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 1998,
1997 and 1996, of our report dated January 19, 1999, which appears on Pages 28
through 56 of the annual report to shareholders.


                                    /s/ BROUSSARD, POCHE, LEWIS & BREAUX, L.L.P.


Lafayette, Louisiana
January 19, 1999
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   | /s/                Caixia                Peng                                                                     |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | Caixia                    PengChief                    Financial OfficerDate:                     August 14, 2007 |

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3014-000]


Entergy Power Marketing Corp.; Notice of Filing

July 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 15, 1997, Entergy Power Marketing Corp. 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before August 1, 1997. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19743 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M