alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016211EN.01000201.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 April 2016 — Council of the European Union v Bank Saderat Iran, European Commission

(Case C-200/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Combating nuclear proliferation - Restrictive measures taken against the Islamic Republic of Iran - Freezing of funds of an Iranian bank - Obligation to state reasons - Procedure for the adoption of the act - Manifest error of assessment))

(2016/C 211/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Bank Saderat Iran (represented by: D. Wyatt QC, R. Blakeley, Barrister, and by S. Jeffrey, S. Ashley and A. Irvine, Solicitors), European Commission (represented by: D. Gauci and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the appellant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: L. Christie and S. Behzadi-Spencer, acting as Agents, and by S. Lee, Barrister)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Dismisses the cross-appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the cross-appeal;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Bank Saderat Iran in both sets of proceedings, except for the costs relating to the cross-appeal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Bank Saderat Iran in both sets of proceedings, except for the costs relating to the cross-appeal;

| 4. | Orders Bank Saderat Iran to bear its own costs relating to the cross-appeal and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in relation to the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Bank Saderat Iran to bear its own costs relating to the cross-appeal and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in relation to the cross-appeal.

| 5. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Commission to bear their own costs of both sets of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Commission to bear their own costs of both sets of proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

---
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 18, 2007 | By:*/s/*Robert                KohnRobert                  Kohn Chief                    Executive Officer |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                                                                                      |
|                              |                                                                                                      |
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **FirstBingo.com** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended **March 31, 2005** as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard L. Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 23rd day of May, 2005.

 
/s/ Richard L. Wachter 
Richard L. Wachter 
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.1 
    

    
      Offer Letter Between Geron Corporation
      and
Dr. Fabio M.
      Benedetti, Dated January 24, 2008
    

    
      January 24, 2008

Fabio Benedetti, M.D.
[Home Address]

Dear
      Fabio:
    

    
      On behalf of Geron Corporation ("Geron"), I am pleased to extend you an
      offer to internally transfer to the role of Senior Vice President and
      Chief Medical Officer of Geron Oncology effective immediately. This is a
      corporate officer, regular full-time, exempt position, reporting
      directly to me. Your annual salary will be $350,000 which will be paid
      on a semi-monthly basis from the effective date above. Your performance
      evaluation and your increase awarded at year-end will be based on your
      performance in your new position. Your potential bonus is 40% of your
      base salary.
    

    
      In this role, you will have direct responsibility for the strategic
      direction and day-to-day pre-clinical and clinical operations of the
      Oncology Business Unit at Geron. You will be a member of the Geron
      Operating Committee – the strategy-setting body of the Company. In this
      new role, you are expected to continue to provide satisfactory services,
      to abide by all of Geron’s policies and procedures, and to comply with
      your obligations concerning Geron’s confidential and proprietary
      information. Additionally, you will continue to be employed on an
      at-will basis.
    

    
      If this arrangement is acceptable to you, please indicate your
      acceptance by returning a signed copy of this offer letter to Human
      Resources.
    

    
      Sincerely,
    

    
      /s/ Thomas B. Okarma
    

    
      Thomas Okarma, Ph.D., M.D.
President, CEO
    

    
      Enclosures
    

    
      AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
    

    
      /s/ Fabio Benedetti                     
Fabio
      Benedetti


Date:  January 24, 2008
                           

Transfer
      Effective Date: January 24, 2008                 
    

    

    

    
      5
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division 

                    Notice is hereby given that, on March 25, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Ranatec Instrument AB, Flöjelbergsgatan, Mölndal, SWEDEN; One Stop Systems, Inc., Escondido, CA; and BAE Systems, San Diego, CA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, MEN Micro, Inc., Ambler, PA has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. 

                    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).                 

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 8, 2008. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 25, 2008 (73 FR 10066).                 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations,  Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E8-10133 Filed 5-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
No. 74-870.

#### Lawson *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 54948.

#### Artisan Products Import, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 155162-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Energy deputy commander visits Troop Support leaders

By Alexandria Brimage-GrayDefense Logistics Agency Troop Support

                PHILADELPHIA  –              
Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support senior leaders welcomed DLA Energy Deputy Commander W. Eric Smith to educate him on the organization’s mission Feb. 19 in Philadelphia.

DLA Troop Support Commander Army Brig. Gen. Gavin Lawrence and supply chain leaders met with Smith to raise awareness about the organization’s mission as well as its support to the military services and its whole of government partners.

Located at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, DLA Energy provides the Department of Defense and other government agencies with comprehensive energy solutions in the most effective and efficient manner possible, according to its website.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Defense Logistics AgencyDefense Logistics Agency Troop SupportDefense Logistics Agency Energyleader engagementmission brief
February 5, 1940

No. 43201.

#### Protest 737294-G of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.

Abstract 30494. Application by plaintiff for rehearing granted.
# Exhibit 99.2

I, Peter T. Kissinger, the Chairman of the Board; President; and Chief Executive
Officer of Bioanalytical  Systems,  Inc.,  certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002, (the Report)  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934,  and (ii) the  information  contained in the Report fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of  Bioanalytical  Systems,  Inc. as of the dates and for the periods
set forth therein.

| | /s/ Peter T. Kissinger
Chairman of the Board;
President and
Chief Executive Officer
January 28, 2003
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2012355EN.01003302.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/33

---

Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Ubee Interactive v OHIM — Augere Holdings (Netherlands) (ubee)

(Case T-408/12)

2012/C 355/70

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ubee Interactive Corp. (Jhubei City, Taiwan) (represented by: M. Nentwig, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Augere Holdings (Netherlands) BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 July 2012 in case R 1848/2011-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 July 2012 in case R 1848/2011-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘ubee’, for goods and services in classes 9 and 38 — Community trade mark application No 7467111

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 7130248 of the word mark ‘QUBEE’, for goods and services in classes 9, 37, 38 and 42; Community trade mark No 7224603 of the figurative mark ‘QUBEE’, for goods and services in classes 9, 37, 38 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2012133EN.01003003.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/30

---

Action brought on 15 February 2012 — ZZ v European Economic and Social Committee

(Case F-21/12)

2012/C 133/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision withdrawing the award of expatriation allowance to the applicant and retroactively seeking to recover that allowance.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority (‘AA’) of the EESC of 9 June 2011 withdrawing the award of expatriation allowance to the applicant with effect from 1 July 2010 and seeking to recover the expatriation allowance paid to him since that date; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority (‘AA’) of the EESC of 9 June 2011 withdrawing the award of expatriation allowance to the applicant with effect from 1 July 2010 and seeking to recover the expatriation allowance paid to him since that date;

| — | Insofar as it is necessary, annul the implied decision of the AA of the EESC rejecting the claim brought by the applicant on 9 September 2011 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Insofar as it is necessary, annul the implied decision of the AA of the EESC rejecting the claim brought by the applicant on 9 September 2011 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

| — | Order the EESC to reimburse the applicant for the expatriation allowance recovered with effect from 1 July 2010 and to pay expatriation allowance which has not been paid since 9 June 2011, all together with late payment interest at the rate of the European Central Bank increased by two points; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the EESC to reimburse the applicant for the expatriation allowance recovered with effect from 1 July 2010 and to pay expatriation allowance which has not been paid since 9 June 2011, all together with late payment interest at the rate of the European Central Bank increased by two points;

| — | Order the EESC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the EESC to pay the costs.

---
# C_2012217EN.01002501.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/25

---

Action brought on 15 May 2012 — Vila Vita Hotel und Touristik v OHIM — Viavita (VIAVITA)

(Case T-204/12)

2012/C 217/53

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vila Vita Hotel und Touristik GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany) (represented by: G. Schoenen and V. Töbelmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Viavita SASU (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Overturn the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 March 2012 in case R 419/2011-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Overturn the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 March 2012 in case R 419/2011-1;

| — | Order OHIM to bear the costs of the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to bear the costs of the applicant; and

| — | In the event that the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal joins in these proceedings as an intervening party, order it to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the event that the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal joins in these proceedings as an intervening party, order it to bear its own costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘VIAVITA’, for services in classes 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 52201504

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Austrian trade mark registration No 154631 of the word mark ‘VILA VITA PARC’, for services in classes 39 and 42; German trade mark registration No 2097301 of the figurative mark ‘VILA VITA TOURISTIK GMBH’, for goods and services in classes 3, 35, 37, 39 et 41

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---