alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION


I, Craig Burton, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of USIP.Com, Inc.;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:


a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May  9, 2005

                                                      s/s  Craig Burton
                                                        Craig Burton, President
No. 96-7074.

#### Sparks *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro
Jennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director

March 28, 2008
Date

---
Exhibit 32.1   BINGHAM CANYON CORPORATION  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Bingham Canyon Corporation (the “Company”) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: August 8, 2007 /s/ Brett D. Mayer Brett D. Mayer Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a meeting on June 5, 2007, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

                    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate solely to the internal                           ( print page 27339)                        personnel rules and practices of the ACRS, and information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: 

*Tuesday, June 5, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-10 a.m.*

The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related matters. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Sam Duraiswamy (telephone: 301-415-7364) between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public. 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the agenda. 

Dated: May 8, 2007. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Branch Chief, ACRS.

[FR Doc. E7-9309 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 47680.

#### Petition 6265-R of Allied Chemical *&*Dye Corp., etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The merchandise, sulforidinolate DC, was entered on the basis of foreign-market value under section 402 (c), Tariff Act of 1930, and appraised on the basis of cost of production under section 402 (f). From the testimony it appeared that a representative of the importing corporation consulted with the Government examiner and the appraiser but was unable to secure any information as to value other than the foreign value which had been previously agreed upon. The only point of disagreement was on an item of profit. An appeal was filed but later abandoned. On the record presented it was found there was no intent to defraud the Government or to conceal the facts from the Government officials. The petition was therefore granted.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# May New Employee Orientation 

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The DLA Land and Maritime New Employee Orientation will take place May 30 in the Building 20 Buckeye Room from 9 a.m. - 3 p.m. and May 31 from 9 a.m. - 2 p.m. 

Starting a new job can be confusing and stressful. During orientation, there will be presentations from various organizations that will provide guidance and support to help new associates become better acclimated to the organization and embrace their new career. 

New associates from all local DLA-hosted tenants, military and interns are welcome to attend. 

The training is mandatory for all new DLA Land and Maritime employees and is held the last Wednesday and Thursday of every month. 

Attendance is tracked and reported to Command. 

If you have any questions, please contact Dawn Sutton, NEO coordinator, at 614-692-6824.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Culture L&MDLA L&Mnew employee L&MCommunity L&MResource the Enterprise L&M
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamosa Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kendall Cowan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.






August 14, 2002                             /s/ Kendall Cowan
---------------                             -----------------------
Date                                        Kendall Cowan
                                            Chief Financial Officer






This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Wilfredo ORTIZ, etc., et al., Appellant, v. SunTRUST, f/k/a SunBank, N.A., Appellee.

No. 98-2355.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 4, 1999.

Pamela Mark Burke and E. Clay Parker of Parker, Burke, Landerman & Parker, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.

Robert A. Hannah and Charles J. Meltz of Hannah, Voght, Estes & Ingram, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

W. SHARP, Judge.

Wilfredo Ortiz and his parents, Felix Ortiz and Lillian Rivera, appeal from an *555order and final judgment awarding costs and attorney fees to SunTrust, one of the defendants below in a personal injury suit. The lower court previously entered summary judgment in favor of SunTrust and this court affirmed. *Ortiz v. Suntrust,*701 So.2d 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

We find no error in the awards made below except with regard to costs for case evaluations prepared by three expert witnesses: Dr. Thomas Hegert (a medical examiner); Dr. Jane Mattson (a pediatric life care planner); and William Charvat (an architect and building design expert). The cause of action concerned the serious injury to a young child caused by the child becoming entangled in a vertical blind cord in his parents’ apartment. SunTrust also referred to Charvat’s deposition testimony in its motion for summary judgment.

It appears these evaluations were necessary either for the motion for summary judgment or to enable SunTrust to prepare for trial. Thus the awards per se are not an abuse of discretion. *See Orlando Regional Medical Center v. Chmielew-sk%*573 So.2d 876 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), *rev. denied,*583 So.2d 1034, 1036 (Fla. 1991).

However, the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Cases provide:

2. Expert Witnesses

> A. Charges made by the expert for examinations or inspections or research prior to trial for purpose of enabling witness to express expert opinions. Such charges should be considered by the Court in setting a reasonable fee, especially in such cases as Eminent Domain where the expert must thoroughly inspect the property, check comparable sales, etc. The Court should consider the nature of the expert testimony; whether or not the expert witness was really needed; the entire facts and circumstances or the case; and then award such monetary sum for preparation as the facts of the case warrant.

> B. Charges made by expert witnesses for reports submitted to or conferences with attorney prior to trial. Such charges or costs should not be taxed.

It is not clear from the record what, if any, part of the costs taxed for these three experts in relates to charges made for reports, which are not taxable, or relates to inspection or research for the purpose of enabling the witness to express an expert opinion, which are taxable under the guidelines. *See also James P. Driscoll, Inc. v. Gould,*521 So.2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court to determine what portion of the costs or fees charged in this case represents taxable costs under the guidelines.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1951 

To restore the exemption from fees for certain customs services for passengers 

arriving from Canada, Mexico, and islands adjacent to the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2011 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To restore the exemption from fees for certain customs services for passengers arriving from Canada, Mexico, and 

islands adjacent to the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF EXEMPTION FROM FEES FOR 

4 CERTAIN CUSTOMS SERVICES FOR PAS5 SENGERS ARRIVING FROM CANADA, MEXICO, 

6 AND ISLANDS ADJACENT TO THE UNITED 

7 STATES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 13031(b)(1)(A)(i) of the 

9 Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 

10 (19 U.S.C. 58c(b)(1)(A)(i)) is amended to read as follows: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1951 IS

1 ‘‘(i) the arrival of any passenger whose jour2 ney— 

3 ‘‘(I) originated in— 

4 ‘‘(aa) Canada, 

5 ‘‘(bb) Mexico, 

6 ‘‘(cc) a territory or possession of the 

7 United States, or 

8 ‘‘(dd) any adjacent island (within the 

9 meaning of section 101(b)(5) of the Immi10 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

11 1101(b)(5))), or 

12 ‘‘(II) originated in the United States and 

13 was limited to— 

14 ‘‘(aa) Canada, 

15 ‘‘(bb) Mexico, 

16 ‘‘(cc) territories and possessions of the 

17 United States, and 

18 ‘‘(dd) such adjacent islands;’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 subsection (a) applies with respect to passengers arriving 

21 from Canada, Mexico, or an adjacent island on or after 

22 the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment 

23 of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### SUCCESSION OF Evelyn Breaux ELVERUM.

No. 98-C-2688.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Rihner, Sidney M.; — Other(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and.or Review; Parish of St. Mary 16th Judicial District Court Div. “C” Number 14,795; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CA97 2085.

Denied.

VICTORY, J. not on panel.
# C_2014395EN.01001401.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/14

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission

(Case C-192/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Cohesion fund - Reduction of the financial assistance - Adoption of the decision by the European Commission - Existence of a time-limit - Failure to comply with the time-limit - Consequences))

(2014/C 395/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Spain v Commission (T-235/11, EU:T:2013:49); |
| --- | --- |

1)

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Spain v Commission (T-235/11, EU:T:2013:49);

| 2) | Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 1023 final of 18 February 2011 reducing the assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund to the stages of projects entitled ‘Supply and assembly of track materials on the high-speed line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Madrid-Lleida’ (CCI 1999.ES.16.C.PT.001), ‘High-speed railway line Madrid-Barcelona. Section Lleida Martorell (Platform, 1st phase)’ (CCI 2000.ES.16.C.PT.001), ‘High-speed line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Railway access to the new station at Zaragoza’ (CCI 2000.ES.16.C.PT.003), ‘High-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell. Subsection X-A (Olérdola-Avinyonet del Penedés)’ (CCI 2001.ES.16.C.PT.007), ‘New high-speed railway access to Levante. Subsection La Gineta-Albacete (Platform)’ (CCI 2004.ES.16.C.PT.014); |
| --- | --- |

2)

Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 1023 final of 18 February 2011 reducing the assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund to the stages of projects entitled ‘Supply and assembly of track materials on the high-speed line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Madrid-Lleida’ (CCI 1999.ES.16.C.PT.001), ‘High-speed railway line Madrid-Barcelona. Section Lleida Martorell (Platform, 1st phase)’ (CCI 2000.ES.16.C.PT.001), ‘High-speed line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Railway access to the new station at Zaragoza’ (CCI 2000.ES.16.C.PT.003), ‘High-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell. Subsection X-A (Olérdola-Avinyonet del Penedés)’ (CCI 2001.ES.16.C.PT.007), ‘New high-speed railway access to Levante. Subsection La Gineta-Albacete (Platform)’ (CCI 2004.ES.16.C.PT.014);

| 3) | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the Kingdom of Spain and to bear its own costs of both the proceedings at first instance and of the present appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the Kingdom of Spain and to bear its own costs of both the proceedings at first instance and of the present appeal proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.

---
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications  The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp. and will be retained by Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  August 10, 2009 /s/ Yun Wang Yun Wang (Chief Executive Officer)  August 10, 2009 /s/ Jianhua Sun Jianhua Sun (Chief Financial Officer)
# C_2014292EN.01000601.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 July 2014 — Electrabel SA v European Commission

(Case C-84/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Concentration of undertakings - Commission decision - Order for payment of a fine - Infringement of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 - Control of concentrations between undertakings - Article 14(3) - Criteria to be taken into account in determining the amount of the fine - Taking into account the duration of the infringement - Principle of non-retroactivity of the law - Application of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Obligation to state reasons))

2014/C 292/07

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Electrabel SA (represented by: M. Pittie and P. Honoré, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, V. Di Bucci and A. Bouquet, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Electrabel SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Electrabel SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.

1

---