alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.3


 


[Sample Legend for Incentive
Units]


 


For Value Received,                      
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto                                                                                                                                                                                                  Units
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably  constitute
and appoint
                                             , Attorney, to  transfer
the said Units on the books of the within named Company, with full power of
substitution in the premises.  


 


Dated                                            , 20           



 


In presence of


 


 


THE
UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE WERE ORIGINALLY ISSUED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 2.3(F) OF THE COMPANY’S MEMBER CONTROL AGREEMENT FOR WHICH
THE AMOUNT OF THE CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION WAS ZERO. ACCORDINGLY, THE UNITS HAVE
DIFFERING ECONOMIC ENTITLEMENTS AND ALLOCATIONS OF TAXABLE GAIN AS COMPARED TO
UNITS ISSUED IN CONSIDERATION OF TWO DOLLARS ($2.00) PER UNIT. EACH UNIT IS
SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL ALLOCATION OF UP TO TWO DOLLARS ($2.00) OF GAIN UNDER
SECTION 3.3(J) OF THE COMPANY’S MEMBER CONTROL AGREEMENT, AND IF THE
GAIN AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION IS LESS THAN TWO DOLLARS ($2.00) PER UNIT, THE
LIQUIDATING DISTRIBUTION ENTITLEMENT OF THE HOLDER OF THESE UNITS WILL BE LESS
THAN THE ENTITLEMENTS OF THOSE UNITS THAT WERE ORIGINALLY ISSUED IN
CONSIDERATION OF A CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION OF TWO DOLLARS ($2.00) PER UNIT.


 


THE
UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”) OR ANY STATE
SECURITIES LAWS OTHER THAN MINNESOTA. THE UNITS MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED
FOR SALE, OR TRANSFERRED IN THE ABSENCE OF EITHER AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND UNDER THE APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR AN
OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT
FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES
LAWS.


 


THE
UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIONS AS TO THEIR
SALE, TRANSFER, HYPOTHECATION, OR ASSIGNMENT AS SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY’S
OPERATING AND MEMBER CONTROL AGREEMENT. SAID RESTRICTIONS PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, THAT NO VENDEE, TRANSFEREE, ASSIGNEE, OR ENDORSEE OF A MEMBER SHALL
HAVE THE RIGHT TO BECOME A MEMBER WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE COMPANY’S BOARD,
WHICH CONSENT MAY BE GIVEN OR WITHHELD IN THE SOLE AND ABSOLUTE DISCRETION
OF THE BOARD.
Order entered June 19, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01411-CR

No. 05-12-01414-CR

MURELL NORMAN MUCK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 366-81548-11, 366-81549-11

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s June 4, 2013 motion for extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file the brief within THIRTY DAYS from the date of this 

order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1
STATE OF NEW MEXICO , 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3
v. NO. A-1-CA-36497 4 DIAMANTINA SANCHEZ , 5 Defendant-Appellant, 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 7 Cristina T. Jaramillo, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender 12 Santa Fe, NM 13 Law Office of Ramsey & Hoon, LLC 14 Twila A. Hoon 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellant 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 ZAMORA, Judge. 192 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 2
been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 3 {2} AFFIRMED. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

_______________________________ 6 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 7
WE CONCUR: 8

___________________________________ 9 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge 10

_________________________________ 11 JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge 12
#### STATE ex rel. Roosevelt McGEE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 98-KH-2984.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re McGee, Roosevelt; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 253-297.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he filed on or about October 21, 1996, supplemented on April 29, 1998. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this court with a copy of its judgment.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
Before the Second Division,

February 19, 1940

No. 43243.

#### Protest 127617-G of Salem Shawiry (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of Normandy laces similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
|  | (a) | the      Form 10-K Annual Report of the Company for the year ended September 30,      2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (b) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.. |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:  /s/  Richard      M. Shepperd                                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard      M. ShepperdPresident      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  January      13, 2010 |

|   | By:  /s/  Michael      R. Cox                                                                                        |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael      R. CoxVice      President, Finance and Administrationand      Chief Financial OfficerDate:  January      13, 2010 |

----
No. 48171.

#### Protests 1654-K, etc., of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of articles in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones, wholly or in chief value of-glass, and that they are similar to those the subject of Abstract 47818. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1503, as modified, was sustained.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ STEPHEN A. SNIDER
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ J. MICHAEL ANDERSON
EXHIBIT 99.8


Consent of Independent Auditor
 
 We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 of Rubicon Minerals Corporation of our report dated March 27, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Exhibit 99.2. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Names and Interests of Experts” in such Form 40-F.
 
 We also consent to the incorporation by reference of the above report into Rubicon Minerals Corporation’s Registration Statement (No. 333-194076) on Form F-10.
 
 signed “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”
 
 Chartered Accountants
 Vancouver, British Columbia
 March 27, 2015
Exhibit 10.47

Capital Lease Funding, Inc.
Summary of Compensation to
Independent Directors

|                                      |                       | 
|------------------------------------- | --------------------- | 
|                                      | 2006                  | 
|                                      |                       | 
|Annual cash
  retainer                | $31,000(1)            | 
|Committee
  chair additional retainer | $6,000(2)             | 
|Stock award                           | 2,500
  shares(3)     | 
|Board
  attendance fee                | $1,000 per meeting(4) | 
|Committee
  attendance fee            | $500 per
  meeting(5) | 

---

(2) Except for our audit committee
chair, who receives $10,000.

(3) Except for our audit committee
chair, who receives 3,250 shares. All awards will vest in three equal annual
installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(4) $500 fee if attended by
teleconference.

(5) Committee
attendance fees are not paid for meetings held on the same day as a Board
meeting.

---
Order entered April 7, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01092-CR

No. 05-19-01093-CR

REGINALD QUOMONE JORDAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-60840-Q & F14-60841-Q

ORDER

We REINSTATE these appeals.

We abated for the appointment of counsel. On April 5, 2020, Michael 

Casillas informed the Court he had been appointed counsel. We DIRECT the 

Clerk to list Michael R. Casillas as counsel for appellant. All future 

correspondence shall be sent to Mr. Casillas at the address on file with the Court.

Appellant’s brief is DUE by May 22, 2020.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO
              18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350
              AS
      ADDED BY
              SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Peoples Financial Services
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Debra E. Dissinger,
Executive Vice President, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. To my
knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





By/s/
            Debra
      E. Dissinger
              Executive
      Vice President
              Principal
      Financial Officer





Date:
March 17, 2008
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written certification required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ DANIEL E. DOSORETZ, M.D.         
|Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D.             
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(principal executive officer)        
|February 18, 2005
NO. 07-09 -009 2-CV IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL A MA Y27, 2009

_________

_________

_________

___ JOHN D. F AIL S, JR., APP ELL ANT

V. MI CH AEL “ MI KE” LOW E, A PPELLE E

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 10 8 T H DI ST RI CT COU RT OF P OT T ER COU NT Y; NO . 97, 237- E; H ON ORABLE DO UG LAS W OOD BU RN , J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before CAMPBE LL a nd HANCOCK an d PIRT LE, JJ. O R D E RO F D I S M I S S AL Appel lan t, John D. F ail s, Jr ., filed sui t ag ain st Mi chael Low e, i n hi s o ff ic ial ca paci ty as a c or re cti onal off ic er at the N eal U nit of t he Tex as Dep artment of C ri minal Ju sti ce, and re q uest ed redr ess for retal iat ion and harass ment as w ell for v iol ati ons of hi s r ig hts under the Tex as Con sti tuti on. The tr ial co urt di smi ss ed F ail s’ s s uiton J anuar y 30, 2009. Fai ls fil ed h is notic e of appeal on M ar ch 19, 2 009. U nder the Tex as Rul es of Appel lat e Procedu re , F ail s’ s n oti ce of appeal w as due no lat er than M ar ch 1. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1. On Apr il 21, 2009, the appel lat e cl er k’ s off ic e sent Fai ls a let ter st ati ng thatEven if app ellanthad requested an extension of time to f ile his notice o f app eal, h is 1 noti ce of appeal and a moti on req uest ing an e xtens ion w er e due w it hin 15 d ay s from the ex pirati on of the deadl ine for fil ing a t imel y noti ce of appeal . Se e T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.3. 2 itappeared th at ou r ju ris d ic ti on w as not p ro per ly i nv oked. Fur

ther , t he l etter

req uest ed that Fai ls sh ow

how thi s c our

t doe s h av e j ur is dic ti on and w hy t h e appeal sh oul d notbe dis mi s s ed for w an t of j ur i s di c ti on . To da te , w e ha v e ha d no r es po ns e to the court’s re q uest

. W e hav e notrecei v ed any ex pla nati on, reas onabl e or othe rw is e, t o j ust ify

the 1 lat e fil ing of

t h e n o tice of appeal

. See M il ler v . G re enpar k S urg er

y As soc s., Ltd. , 974 S.W .2d 8 05, 8 08 ( Tex .App. –Ho ust on [14 D is t.] 1998, no p et.) ; Ve rb urg t v . D or ner , 959 th S.W .2d 615 , 617 (Tex. 1997 ). W e, t her efore, dis mis s t he appe al. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3.

Mackey K. Hancock Justice
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D2024-0952

LT Case Nos. 2015-CF-304123

 2017-CF-301154 

 2017-CF-301157

 2017-CF-301158

 2017-CF-301159

2017-CF-303672

_____________________________ 

CLAUDIOUS STALLINGS, 

Petitioner, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondent. 

_____________________________ 

Petition for Belated Appeal. 

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Rachael E. Reese, Rachael Reese, PA, Tampa, for Petitioner. 

No Appearance for Respondent. 

May 3, 2024

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this 

opinion shall be filed with the trial court and treated as the notice 

of appeal from the March 1, 2024 order denying Petitioner’s motion 

for postconviction relief rendered in Case Nos. 2015-CF-304123, 
2 

2017-CF-301154, 2017-CF-301157, 2017-CF-301158, 2017-CF301159 and 2017-CF-303672, in the Circuit Court in and for 

Volusia County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED. 

LAMBERT, JAY, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur. 

____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.02   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Friendly Energy Exploration (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Trapp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Donald Trapp By: Donald Trapp Chief Financial Officer  Dated: August 11, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CS
      CHINA ACQUISITION CORP.

     

                    _____________
      ___,
      2008

    


    CS
      Capital USA, LLC

    4100
      N.E.
      Second Avenue, Suite 318

    Miami,
      Florida 33137

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date
      (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering
      (“IPO”) of the securities of CS China Acquisition Corp. (“CSC”) and continuing
      until the earlier of the consummation by CSC of a “Business Combination” (as
      described in CSC’s IPO prospectus) or CSC’s liquidation (the “Termination
      Date”), CS Capital USA, LLC shall make available to CSC certain office and
      secretarial services as may be required by CSC from time to time, situated
      at
      4100 N.E. Second Avenue, Suite 318, Miami, Florida 33137. In exchange therefore,
      CSC shall pay CS Capital USA, LLC the sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective
      Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date.

    
      	 	 	 
	 	
              Very
                truly yours,

            
	 	 
	 	
              CS
                CHINA ACQUISITION CORP.

            
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	
            	By:  	
            
	 	
              

              Name:
                 

            
	 	
              Title:
                

            


    

     

    AGREED
      TO
      AND ACCEPTED BY:

    


    CS
      CAPITAL USA, LLC

     

    
      	 	 	 	 
	By: 	 	 	
            
	
              
                

              

              Name:
                

              Title:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1707 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1707

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 
     which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally 
                   incompetent for certain purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 13, 2011

 Mr. Burr (for himself, Mr. Webb, Mr. Moran, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Wicker, 
    Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Begich, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Thune, Mr. 
 Cochran, and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 
     which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally 
                   incompetent for certain purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Second Amendment Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONS AS ADJUDICATED 
              MENTALLY INCOMPETENT FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 55 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated 
              mentally incompetent for certain purposes
    ``In any case arising out of the administration by the Secretary of 
laws and benefits under this title, a person who is mentally 
incapacitated, deemed mentally incompetent, or experiencing an extended 
loss of consciousness shall not be considered adjudicated as a mental 
defective under subsection (d)(4) or (g)(4) of section 922 of title 18 
without the order or finding of a judge, magistrate, or other judicial 
authority of competent jurisdiction that such person is a danger to 
himself or herself or others.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 55 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following 
new item:

``5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated 
                            mentally incompetent for certain 
                            purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```