alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1915 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1915

 To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 to provide 
clarification regarding the applicability of exemptions relating to the 
 transportation of agricultural commodities and farm supplies, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 28, 2011

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Roberts) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 to provide 
clarification regarding the applicability of exemptions relating to the 
 transportation of agricultural commodities and farm supplies, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES AND FARM 
              SUPPLIES.

    Section 229(a)(1) of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 
1999 (49 U.S.C. 31136 note) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Transportation of agricultural commodities and farm 
        supplies.--Regulations prescribed by the Secretary under 
        sections 31136 and 31502 regarding maximum driving and on-duty 
        time for drivers used by motor carriers shall not apply during 
        planting and harvest periods, as determined by each State, to--
                    ``(A) drivers transporting agricultural commodities 
                in the State from the source of the agricultural 
                commodities to a location within a 100 air-mile radius 
                from the source;
                    ``(B) drivers transporting farm supplies for 
                agricultural purposes in the State from a wholesale or 
                retail distribution point of the farm supplies to a 
                farm or other location where the farm supplies are 
                intended to be used within a 100 air-mile radius from 
                the distribution point; or
                    ``(C) drivers transporting farm supplies for 
                agricultural purposes in the State from a wholesale 
                distribution point of the farm supplies to a retail 
                distribution point of the farm supplies within a 100 
                air-mile radius from the wholesale distribution 
                point.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014409EN.01001201.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Holger Forstmann Transporte GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Münster

(Case C-152/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Directive 2003/96/EC - Taxation of energy products and electricity - Exceptions - Energy products contained in the standard tanks of commercial motor vehicles and intended to be used as fuel by those vehicles - Definition of ‘standard tanks’ within the meaning of Article 24(2) of that directive - Tanks fitted by a coachbuilder or a manufacturer’s dealer))

2014/C 409/16

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Holger Forstmann Transporte GmbH & Co. KG

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Münster

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The term ‘standard tanks’, referred to in the first indent of Article 24(2) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, must be interpreted as not excluding tanks fixed permanently to commercial motor vehicles intended for the direct supply of fuel to those vehicles when the tanks have been fitted by a person other than the manufacturer, in so far as the tanks enable fuel to be used directly, both for the purpose of propulsion of the vehicles and, where appropriate, for the operation, during transport, of refrigeration systems and other systems.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

1

---
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0642 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-035-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 108 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The proposed actions of this AD are intended to prevent the in-flight loss of the door, 

which could damage the helicopter and injure persons on the ground.

Costs:

 Visually inspecting the door’s lock release assembly and the middle and upper levers 

would require 4 work-hours for a labor cost of $340 per helicopter. No parts would be needed, so 

that the total cost for the U.S. fleet would be $36,720.

 Visually inspecting all hardware, guides and door attachment points for misaligned or 

bent fittings would require 4 work-hours for a labor cost of $340 per helicopter. Parts may be 

needed but on an individual basis, so that the total cost for the U.S. fleet would be at least 

$36,720.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Matt Fuller
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/19 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
Exhibit 32.2



                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Data Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sanding
Tao, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






May 20, 2005                     /s/ Sanding Tao
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Sanding Tao, Chief Financial Officer
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator US EPA, Region 4 Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center Atlanta, Georgia 30303 May 16, 2011

Subject: State Implementation Plan Revisions to SignificantDeterioration and New Source Review Provisions Incorporating PM2.5 Provisions DearMs. Fleming: On November 18, 2010, the Environmental Management Commission (EMC) approved amendments to 15A NCAC 02D .0530, Prevention ofSignificantDeterioration, and 02D .0531 Sources in Nonattainment Areas, to incorporate PM2.5 as a regulated pollutant. These rule amendments were the subject ofa public hearing held on August 31, 201 0, were approvedby the State Rules Review Commission at its December 16, 20 10 meeting, and became effective January 2, 2011. Enclosed is the hearing record for this public hearing and a copy ofthe rules for which approval is requested. Note that the rules for which approval is requested differ from the rules in ChapterII ofthe hearing record as a result ofchanges made by the Environmental Management Commission post production ofthe hearing record. The hard copies ofthe rules and hearing record are identical to the .pdffiles recorded on the CD. Pleaseproceed to approve the aforementioned rule amendments as part ofthe federally-approved State Implementation Plan. Ifyou need additional information or have any questions, please contact Ms. Joelle Burleson ofmy staffat (919)733-1474

Enclosures SCH/jb
c: Beverly Banister Dick Schutt Lynorae Benjamin Nacosta Ward Hearing Record File North Carolina 27699-1641

An Sincerely,

Sheila C. Holman

# N~rthCarolina 

# )Vaturallu
#### Oceano Shipping Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6878.

Entry No. 861768, etc.

Invoices dated Genoa, Italy, June 9, 1939, etc.

Certified June 9, 1939, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y.,'June 24, 1939, etc.

(Decided February 14, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Joshua M. Davidson*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement involve the question of the value of certain drums filled with olive oil or other commodities imported from various countries.

From the uncontradicted evidence it appears that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that involved in *C. H. Powell Co., Inc. (Douredoure Bros.)*v. *United States,*28 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 310, C. A. D. 160, and the record in that case has been incorporated herein. The court there held that — ■

> * * * the presumed correctness of the value — 300 Drachmas each — found by the appraiser to be the foreign and dutiable value of the involved drums has not been overcome by the evidence of record.

That observation is equally applicable to the drums involved in these appeals.

Inasmuch as there is no export value higher than the above-mentioned foreign value, I follow the cited authority and find that “the foreign and dutiable value of the involved drums” in each of these appeals is the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 74-5472.

#### Nudd *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  Primeplayer  Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Alexander  Gilliland,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2003

/s/ Alexander Gilliland
-----------------------
Alexander Gilliland
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
1

BECKHAM, LISA

Subject: NSR Rules - with EPA

Location: Teleconference

Start: Tue 1/27/2015 1:00 PM

End: Tue 1/27/2015 2:30 PM

Show Time As: Tentative

Recurrence: (none)

Meeting Status: Not yet responded

Organizer: BECKHAM, LISA

Required Attendees: Steve Burr; R9-ConfLine-Card1-AIR_Only/Conf-Line/Region-9-RESTRICTED

Hi SteveI doubt this will take an hour and a half, but here’s what I would like to discuss this afternoon. I think it will just be me on 

the line. 

· PM2.5 SMC – Court decision vacated this provision. We recently amended 40 CFR 51.166 to be consistent with 

the court decision. 

· PM2.5 SILs – Court vacated and remanded this provision (at EPA’s request). We recently amended 40 CFR 

51.166 to be consistent with the court decision. 

· Basic design parameter in R18-2-401 – definition was vacated from 40 CFR 51.166 (term is now undefined) 

· Begin actual construction - 

http://yosemite.epa.gov/r5/r5ard.nsf/8a853ab744d510c68625745800533fd5/3499164915409ed286257db0007

5b0e4/$FILE/OAC%203745-31.pdf (page 2) http://www.epa.gov/region7/air/nsr/nsrmemos/source.pdf

· July 2014 SIP Supplement – need copy of ARS 49-107 

· R18-2-334 – need updated table and certified copy 

· Memo on proposed final permit 

· Historic treatment of condensable PM- 40 CFR 51.166(b)(49)(i)(a) 

· Application of state ambient air standards to nearby states – I don’t remember if we’ve discussed this previously

· Definition for stationary source at R18-2-101(139) – reference to 49-426(A) – I’m not sure I understand this 

reference in the context of the definition. Federal definition is at 40 CFR 51.166(b)(5)
Exhibit 32.2



RITA Medical Systems, Inc.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RITA Medical Systems, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DONALD STEWART                                                                
|Donald Stewart Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Finance and Administration



March 31, 2005
No. 49514.

#### Protests 37252-K, etc., of W. X. Huber Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.)

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1





SKINOVATION PHARMACEUTICAL INCORPORATED



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

18 U.S.C. Section 1350



The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation Pharmaceutical
Incorporated certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | a. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated
for the quarter ended September 30, 2019 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: November 15, 2019 | /s/ Hugo Rodier
        Hugo Rodier
        Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 10.10 – Contract with Allen Kramer


CONTRACT


This
contract entered into this 11th day of January 2007.


Whereas
East Fork Biodiesel, LLC(EFB) desires to protect its investment in the 60 M
gal. per year biodiesel
plant being constructed for EFB by REG, Inc.


Whereas
EFB needs to develop and install a natural gas pipeline from the TBS to be
installed for this
purpose to the wall of the boiler building at the biodiesel plant site.


Therefore, EFB agrees to
hire board member, Allen Kramer to watch over the best interests of EFB by
obtaining bids, selecting the best bid and completing a contract with a natural
gas pipeline builder and management firm
and reporting back to the Board as needed to ensure the best interests of EFB.


For
this service, EFB agrees to pay the sum of $40 per hour for each hour spent
conducting this service
as well as any travel expenses at the established Board rate.


Allen Kramer accepts
this responsibility and will issue monthly statements to include time and expenses and well as reporting to the Board
by communicating with the President or during Board
meetings.


	
 

	
 


	
For East Fork Biodiesel, LLC

	
Allen Kramer


	
 

	
 


	


	



	


	



	
Kenneth
 M. Clark

 President
---



Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Sacha Spindler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pluris
Energy Group Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the
audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2009

*/s/ Sacha H. Spindler* Sacha H. Spindler

  Chief Executive Officer

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 100 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 29139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OA07-23-000]


Alcoa Power Generating Inc., Tapoco Division; Notice of Filing

May 18, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 14, 2007, the Tapoco Division of Alcoa 
Power Generating, Inc. filed a request for waiver of Order No. 889 
Oasis requirements and for partial waiver for Order No. 890, III FERC 
Statue & Regulations, ] 31,035 (1996) and ] 31,131 (2007).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#db9d9e899894b5b7b2b5be88aeababb4a9af9bbdbea9b8f5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d1b180f1e1233313433380e282d2d322f291d3b382f3e733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 13, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9986 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>