alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 45275.

#### Protests 37894-K, etc., of General Dyestuff Corp. (New York).

*525Opinion by

Bbown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the chemical substance in question was held dutiable at 2.85 cents (95 percent of 3 cents) per pound under section 702, Revenue Act of 1938, as claimed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1772 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1772

For the relief of Patricia Macarelli, in her capacity as administratrix 
                of the estate of Edward Brian Halloran.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 2011

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
For the relief of Patricia Macarelli, in her capacity as administratrix 
                of the estate of Edward Brian Halloran.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF PATRICIA MACARELLI.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds 
not otherwise appropriated, the amount of $2,061,000.00, the judgment 
entered by the United States District Court for the District of 
Massachusetts on May 6, 2009, plus interest as provided by section 1304 
of title 31, United States Code, to compensate Patricia Macarelli, in 
her capacity as administratrix of the estate of Edward Brian Halloran, 
for costs related to and damages arising from the murder of Edward 
Brian Halloran in Massachusetts in May 1982 as described in Claim No. 
01-11346-WGY, filed in the United States District Court for the 
District of Massachusetts and Claim No. 09-1951;09-1952 filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
    (b) Satisfaction of Claims.--The payment under subsection (a) shall 
be in full satisfaction of all claims of Patricia Macarelli against the 
United States in connection with the matter described in such 
subsection.
    (c) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS' AND AGENTS' FEES.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 25 
percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to, or 
received by, any agent or attorney for any service rendered in 
connection with the payment under this Act, as set forth in section 
2678 of title 28, United States Code.
    (b) Enforcement.--Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
guilty of an infraction and shall be fined under title 18, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
October 20, 2014 **AEMP Data: Atrazine, Flow, Precipitation and TSS Plots**  **for 2014 Monitoring Year** 2 **2014 IA -**  **04**3 **2014 IA -**  **05**4 **2014 LA -**  **04**5 **2014 MO -**  **01**6 **2014 MO -**  **02**7 **2014 MO -**  **07N**8 **2014 MO -**  **08**9 **2014 NE -**  **04**10 **2014 TX** **- 01**
No. 74-649.

#### Bellizzi *v.*Superior Court of Stanislaus County.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.
No. 48869.

#### Protest 32912-K of Ernst W. C. Toepfer (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted evidence disclosed that the said tape measures are similar to those involved in Abstract 43372, which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained as to the tape measures identified on the invoices accompanying entry 830752. The protest was overruled in all other respects.
# C_2015371EN.01000202.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2015 — European Commission v Slovak Republic

(Case C-433/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 7 - Article 21 - Sickness benefit - Care allowance, assistance allowance and compensatory allowance for extra costs - Residence requirement))

(2015/C 371/03)

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Tokár, D. Martin and F. Schatz, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Slovak Republic (represented by: B. Ricziová, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 336, 16.11.2013.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science                           ( print page 25784)                        Foundation announces the following meeting:                

*Name:*                     Advisory Committee for International Science and Engineering (25104).                 

*Date/Time:*                     June 9, 2008; 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                 

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 375, Arlington, VA.                 

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                 

*Contact Person:*                     Eduardo Feller, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-8710.                 

If you are attending the meeting and need access to the NSF, please contact the individual listed above so you name may be added to the building access list. 

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice concerning issues related to the international science and engineering programs and initiatives of the NSF.                 

*Agenda:*                     Update on Program and Staff Activities. Discussion of Proposed International Policies and Practices and Draft Strategic Plan.  NSB Report on International Science and Engineering Partnerships.  Update on Developing Countries Initiatives. Committee of Visitors Report. Partnerships for International Research and Education.                 

Dated: May 2, 2008. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E8-10036 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report
of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Laurence S. Geller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 29, 2008

|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/S/    LAURENCE S. GELLER                 
|Laurence S. Geller Chief Executive Officer
No. 74-799.

#### United States *v.*Foster Lumber Co., Inc.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00299-CR

ANTHONY STEPHENS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 485th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1678472)

August 22, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
Agreement with Boundary Bay Resources Corporation



 Exhibit 10.5 
  

	
	Kingsley Resources Inc.
	1320 885 West Georgia Street
	Vancouver, BC V6C3E8
	
	December 18, 2007


 Boundary Bay Resources Corporation 
 2140 Kaslo Court 
 Kelowna, BC 
 Canada V1Y8C1 
 Dear Sir: 
 Subject: East Holley
Area/DeSoto Parish, La. 
 The following hereby summarizes the terms and conditions of the agreement by and between Kingsley Resources
Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Seller,” and Boundary Bay Resources Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Purchaser”, covering the East Holley Area, DeSoto Parish, Louisiana. 
 The East Holley Area is hereby described as consisting of Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22 and 23, Township 13 North, Range 14 West and
Section 7 in Township 13 North, Range 13 West, all in DeSoto Parish, Louisiana. 
 Purchaser agrees to purchase from Seller for
$50,000.00 U.S., the right to participate for a five per cent (5%) Working Interest in the initial well drilled by Seller, or the Operator as the case may be. Purchaser agrees to pay in addition to the $50,000.00 described above, 5% of the
total cost to drill and complete the initial well. It is understood and agreed this right to participate is only for the first well drilled by Seller or Operator in the East Holley Area. 
 In the event you are agreeable to the terms described above please sign in the space below and return one completely executed original to Seller at the
address described above. 
  

	
	 Sincerely yours,

	
	 /s/ Byron Coulthard

	 Byron Coulthard



 AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED THIS             
DAY OF                     , 2007. 
  

			
	BOUNDARY BAY RESOURCES CORPORATION
		
	By:
No. 6201.

#### William *J. Oberle, Inc.*v. *United States.*

Entered at New Orleans, La. Reap. Dec. 6164. Motion by plaintiff.
#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6590.

Entry No. 717597, etc.

Invoices dated Northampton, England, September 8, 1941, etc.

Certified September 9, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 7, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 10, 1946)

*Tompkins & Tompkins {J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances •by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2014282EN.01002901.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 July 2014 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-Joined Cases T-319/12 and T-321/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Cinematography - Aid for the construction and operation of a film studio complex - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Criterion of private market economy investor - State aid for regional purposes - Aid to promote culture - Duty to state reasons))

2014/C 282/37

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, abogade del Estado); Cuidad de la Luz, SAU (Alicante, Spain); and Sociedad Proyectos Temáticos de la Comunidad Valenciana, SAU (Alicante) (represented initially by: J. Buendía Sierra, N. Ruiz García, J. Belenguer Mula and M. Muñoz de Juan, and subsequently by: J. Buendía Sierra and J. Belenguer Mula, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, P. Němečková and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 3025 final of 8 May 2012 concerning State aid SA.22668 (C 8/2008 (NN 4/2008)), which Spain implemented in favour of Ciudad de la Luz, SA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders La Ciudad de la Lux, SA, Sociedad Proyectos Temáticos de la Comunidad Valenciana, SA and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders La Ciudad de la Lux, SA, Sociedad Proyectos Temáticos de la Comunidad Valenciana, SA and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications





The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp. and will be retained by Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





March 25, 2011
/s/ Feng YanFeng Yan (Chief Executive Officer)March 25, 2011
/s/ John W. PolingJohn W. Poling (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.2


 


BANK OF SCOTLAND


NEW YORK BRANCH


565 Fifth Avenue


New York, New York 10017


 


 


 


                                                                                                                October
31, 2007


 


 


 


FirstCity Financial Corporation


6400 Imperial Drive


Waco, Texas 76712


 


Gentlemen:


 


We refer to Amendment No.10 and Consent to Revolving Credit Agreement
dated as of August 22, 2007 (the “Amendment”) among FirstCity Financial
Corporation (the “Borrower”), the financial institutions which are parties to
the Agreement hereinafter referred to (the “Lenders”) and Bank of Scotland, as
agent (the “Agent”), for the Lenders under the Revolving Credit Agreement dated
as of November 12, 2004, among the Borrower, the Lenders and the Agent (as
amended to date, the “Agreement”).


The Agent and the Borrower hereby agree and confirm that the date in
Section 9.19 of the Agreement is amended to be November 16, 2007.


Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force
and effect in accordance with its terms.


Please sign below to confirm the terms of this letter, which may be
executed in counterparts, which when taken together shall constitute one and
the same instrument.  This letter shall
be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New
York without reference to choice of law doctrine that would result in the application
of the laws of another jurisdiction.  The
execution and delivery of this letter shall not obligate the Agent to agree to
any further amendments, waivers or consents.


On and after September 17, 2007, the “appointed day” for the
registration of the Bank of Scotland as a public limited company under the
United Kingdom Companies Act 1985, all references in this document to the Bank
of Scotland however expressed shall be deemed to be references to Bank of
Scotland plc.  Bank of Scotland plc is
registered in Scotland and has its registered office at The Mound, Edinburgh
EH1 1YZ.


 


 

















 


This letter may be executed in counterparts, which when taken together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  BANK OF SCOTLAND,

  
	
   

  	
  Individually and as Agent

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
   

  
				



 


 


AGREED:


FIRSTCITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION


 


	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


 


2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 11, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00532

- CR

Daniel Cervantes SALAZAR

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR6992

Honorab le Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is granted. We order appellant’s

brief due February 4, 201 9.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s et my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 11th day of January, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Angeles
Income  Properties,  Ltd. III 1999 Fourth Quarter 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000720460
<NAME>                              Angeles Income Properties, Inc. III
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     2,253
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                     4,920
<DEPRECIATION>                             3,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             4,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 3,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               4,218
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             860
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                              (104)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (92)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               2,076
<EPS-BASIC>                                19.74 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
Opinion issued January 30 , 202 4

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 23 - 00 552 - CV

—————————

—— PEDRO ESCOBAR , Ap pellant

V. JULIO DE LOS REYES , Appellee

O n Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Tex as Trial Court Cause No. 20 18 - 31739 MEMORANDUM OPINION The par ties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal due to a settlement
. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)( 2 ) (A)
. No opinion has issued. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(c).2

Accordingly, we g rant the joint motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a)( 2 ) (A)
. We also dismiss all othe r pending motions as mo ot. PER CURIAM Panel con sists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Landau and Rivas

- Molloy
.
A99A0750.

#### CHASTAIN v. THE STATE.

(512 SE2d 665)

Judge Harold R. Banke.

Tracy Chastain was convicted of aggravated child molestation and child molestation. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal.

This case arose after the seven-year-old victim told her grand*543mother that Chastain had touched her private parts with his hands and tongue. The child reported that Chastain, her mother’s live-in boyfriend, threatened not to take her to Disney World if she told anyone. The grandmother informed the child’s mother and authorities and this prosecution commenced. Held:

Decided February 18,1999.

*John F. McClellan, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Tambra P. Colston, District Attorney, Martha P. Jacobs, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

The record refutes Chastain’s contention that the absence of corroborative evidence requires reversal. But at the outset, we note that unlike our statutory rape statute, OCGA § 16-6-4 does not require corroborating evidence for a conviction. Compare OCGA § 16-6-3 (a).

Even if it did, we would find the evidence sufficient to support the verdict. The victim testified that Chastain touched and licked her vaginal area. She stated that the touching occurred more than ten times and on occasion, “[i]t hurt bad.” The victim’s grandmother testified that the victim told her that Chastain had touched and licked her private parts. See *Redd v. State,*232 Ga. App. 666, 667 (1) (502 SE2d 467) (1998). The State also played a video of the victim discussing the facts underlying the charges which corroborated her trial testimony. See *Kapua v. State,*228 Ga. App. 193, 194-195 (1) (491 SE2d 387) (1997). The record showed that the molestation began less than a month after Chastain moved in with the victim’s mother. The victim’s mother testified that one night she followed Chastain into her daughter’s room and discovered him lying beside her daughter with an erection. He got angry because she followed him. At around the same time, the child’s grandmother received an anonymous letter stating that Chastain “liked” little children and the victim could be in danger. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, is clearly sufficient. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope, P. J, and Smith, J., concur.*