alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November      13, 2008 |   | /s/      Jeffrey S. Keuntjes       |
|------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                                     |   | Jeffrey      S. Keuntjes           |
|                                     |   | Controller                         |
|                                     |   | (principal      financial officer) |

----

----
By her pro se notice of appeal, Appellant referred to herself as “Venna Polite.” 1

NO. 07-08-0115-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

MAY 12, 2008

______________________________

VENNA POLITE DIXON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF 

DESTINY COLBERT, AND TIMOTHY DIXON, INDIVIDUALLY,

AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF KRISTOFER DIXON, APPELLANTS1

V.

KEITH DEAN SCHLESENER, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 95,303-2; HONORABLE PAMELA COOK SIRMON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

By letter dated April 3, 2008, this Court notified Ms. Polite to pay the outstanding

filing fee of $175 on or before April 30, 2008, noting that failure to do so might result in

dismissal.
2

Unless a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the Clerk of this Court is required

to collect filing fees set by statute or the Supreme Court when an item is presented for

filing. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 and 12.1(b). Although the filing of a notice of appeal invokes

this Court’s jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure,

the appeal may be dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b). Consequently, because the filing

fee remains unpaid, we must dismiss the appeal. 

Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with (1) a requirement

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and (2) a notice from the Clerk requiring

payment of the filing fee within a specified time. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Millennium Capital Venture Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mario Drolet, President and acting CFO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: August 21, 2003	By: /s/ MARIO DROLET			
Name: Mario Drolet

Title: President and Acting CFO
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (Nos. 333-47684 and 333-65463) on Form S-8 of Electronics BoutiqueHoldings Corp. of our reports dated April 7, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp. andsubsidiaries as of January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004, and the relatedconsolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended January 29, 2005, and therelated financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 29,2005, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofJanuary 29, 2005, which reports appear in the January 29, 2005 annual report onForm 10-K/A of Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp.  

 

Our report with respect to the consolidated financial statements refersto a change in the method of accounting for consideration received from avendor.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP               |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
| May 16, 2005          |

 

1

----
No. 40490

#### Protest 955270-G of Pacific Nut Oil Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

No evidence was offered in support of the claims made, The protest was therefore overruled.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Memry Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Richard F.
      Sowerby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Richard F. SowerbyRichard
                F. Sowerby
              Chief
                Financial Officer




Dated:
      September 21, 2007




This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
#### W. M. Glenn v. Emma Erath.

No. 15,957.

*Notice*— Pendency *of an Action.*A finding that a defendant’ served by publication did not have actual notice of the pendency of the action in time to defend held conclusive on review.

Error from Greeley district court; Charles E. Lob-dell, judge.

Opinion filed October 9, 1909.

Affirmed.

*Ge'orge A. Kline,*and *Lee Monroe,*for the plaintiff in error.

*D. R. Beckstrom,*for the defendant in error.

*Per Curiam:*

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Greeley county opening the judgment and allowing the defendant, Emma Erath, to come in and defend. The principal question involved in the proceeding is whether she had notice of the pendency of the foreclosure suit to which she was made a party defendant and in which her rights to the land were barred in time to answer and defend, she having been served by publication. There was only circumstantial evidence to prove that she had such notice, and there was direct evidence that she did not have the notice. The court below found in her favor on the question of fact, and its finding can not be reviewed here.

Again, it is contended that the plaintiff in the foreclosure suit would have been entitled to judgment for taxes paid even if his tax deed had been declared void *789in that suit, and that, deducting the amount of such taxes and interest from the price which the land brought at the foreclosure sale, the defendant would have nothing left, and that the reopening of the casé would not be beneficial to her and should not be allowed. The allegations of her answer, however, ,are sufficient, if sustained, to set aside the sheriff’s deed to Glenn in the foreclosure suit, as well as the tax deed.

The order is affirmed.
No. 39202.

#### Petition 5586-R of Alex Anderson & Son (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was established that there was no intention to defraud the revenue. The petition was therefore granted.
#### Laura B. Shaw, respondent, *v.*Thomas F. Shaw, appellant.

[Decided May 3d, 1918.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevens, who filed the following opinion:

My doubt, in this cause has been whether the parties were not living apart by tacit consent. The testimony of the wife is that on her return from Europe in September, 1912, her husband, on the steamship wharf, said to her: *“I*have no plans for your future. I have no place to take you and I have no home for you.” In this she is corroborated by her daughter and son-in-law. She has lived in her daughter’s house ever since. She does not appear to’ have made any considerable effort to induce her husband to provide a home, although he has been able to do so. On the other hand, it is proved that the defendant has made no effort to induce her to live with him. In view of *Sargent*v. *Sargent, 36 N. J. Eq. 644,*a case which decides that the duty to make the effort lies chiefly on the husband and which is in some respects not unlike the present, I am inclined to think the evidence sufficient to establish the desertion alleged.

*Mr. Harry N. Reeves,*for the respondent.

*Messrs. Mulligan & Koenig,*for the appellant.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

*215
      *For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 13.

*For reversal*— None.
r 

-C<^J]l^^^^/^^L^ 

Cifv of Lebanon 

^^Hosri ^003 - /V^:?;? 

,')| \WHII ]\:\i. Su e 

Februarys, 2010 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Room 6401 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S. W. 

Washington, D. C. 20590 

Re: Cape Air, Inc. for Lebanon, New Hampshire 

Essential Air Service Docket OST-2003-14822 

Dear Mr. Devaney: 

At its regularly scheduled meeting on February 3, 2010, the Lebanon City Council 

unanimously voted to authorize a request to the US Department of Transportation 

(USDOT) to replace two of the six daily Cape Air flights to between Lebanon Municipal 

Airport (LEB) and Boston with two daily Cape Air flights to the Westchester County 

Airport (HPN) in White Plains. This proposal will maintain six daily Cape Air flights from 

Lebanon with no increase in Essential Air Service (EAS) subsidy. 

Below is the motion that was unanimously passed by the Lebanon City Council; 

MOVED by Councilor Llot-HHI, seconded by Councilor Sykes, that the Lebanon City 

Coum.il authorize this change in the sen/ice contract with Cape Air and to replace two 

daily 1 Mnd trips between Lebanon and Boston with two daily round trips between 

Lebanon and White Plains, and to authorize the Airport Manager to forward a request 

for same to the USDOT. 

The City looks forward to your confirming this proposed change in service from LEB. 

Please feel free to contact myself or Airport Manager Richard Dyment if we can be of 

further help. 

/giincerely, 

Len Jarvi 

Interim City Manager 

Cc: Richard Dyment. Airport Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CARREKER-ANTINORI, INC'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                          25,973
<SECURITIES>                                    13,563
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,357
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,943
<PP&E>                                           9,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,413
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           185
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,823
<SALES>                                            267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,820
<CGS>                                              208
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    50
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,334
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,440
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,894
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,894
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-70530,
333-63517 and 333-45144) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Carreker Corporation 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan and the Carreker Corporation Director Stock Option Plan of
our reports dated April 6, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Carreker Corporation, Carreker Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Carreker Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended January 31, 2005.



Dallas,
Texas
April 6, 2005

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Brett D. Mayer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bingham Canyon Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: May 9, 2007 /s/ Brett D. Mayer Brett D. Mayer, Principal Executive Officer
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Kam Wah Poon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to China Energy Savings Technology, Inc. and
will be retained by China Energy Savings Technology, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/  Kam Wah
PoonKam
      Wah Poon
      Chief
      Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial Officer)
      Date:  May 23,
2005
SCWC-13-0000385

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

CAROLYN MIZUKAMI, 

Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

DON QUIJOTE (USA) CO. LTD., DTRIC INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

 

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CAAP-13-0000385; CIV. NO. 12-1-3273-12)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna and Pollack, JJ.)

The application for a writ of certiorari, filed on May

24, 2013, is hereby rejected. In addition, the appellate clerk

is directed not to accept any further filings in this closed

certiorari proceeding.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 25, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0000385

25-JUN-2013

09:24 AM
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1854 

To enhance medical surge capacity. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2011 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. ENZI, Mr. CASEY, Ms. MIKULSKI, 

Mr. ALEXANDER, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To enhance medical surge capacity. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Surge Capac5 ity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENHANCING MEDICAL SURGE CAPACITY. 

7 (a) MODIFICATION OF CRITERIA FOR EMERGENCY

8 AREA; EMERGENCY PERIOD.—Section 1135(g)(1)(A) of 

9 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(a)(1)(A)) is 

10 amended by striking ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon and insert11 ing ‘‘or’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1854 IS

1 (b) WAIVER AUTHORITY FOR HOST AREAS.—Section 

2 1135(g)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)), as 

3 amended by subsection (a), is amended by adding after 

4 and below subparagraph (B), the following flush sentence: 

5 ‘‘Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Sec6 retary may deem an emergency area to include a 

7 geographical area into which individuals from the 

8 emergency area are evacuated and receiving care.’’. 

9 (c) DURATION OF EMTALA AND HIPAA WAIV10 ERS.—The third sentence of section 1135(b) of such Act 

11 (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘72-hour’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘96-hour’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 53279.

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 109908-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts:
------------------------------------------------
Reserve deducted from assets:

Allowance for doubtful
 accounts receivable                        2000              1999
----------------------                      ----              ----
Beginning balance                         $ 25,465         $  10,465
Additions charged to expense               133,075            15,000
Write-off of accounts (1)                  (82,090)             -
                                          --------         ---------

Ending balance                            $ 76,450         $  25,465
                                          ========         =========


Allowance for doubtful
 notes receivable                           2000              1999
----------------------                      ----              ----
Beginning balance                         $200,932        $1,907,135
Additions charged to expense               345,000            74,119
Other additions and deductions,net (2)     275,268          (235,286)
Write-off of notes(1)                     (729,236)       (1,545,036)
                                          --------        ----------

Ending balance                            $ 91,964        $  200,932
                                          ========        ==========


(1) - Uncollectible accounts written off.

(2) - Purchase discount on Company-owned notes receivable which was reclassed
      to allowance for doubtful accounts and fully-reserved loans charged back
      from finance company (See Note 3d).

(3) - Restructuring agreement with a finance company (See Note 9)