##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549



---

FORM 20-F



---



| ̈ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OR



|x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period  to

OR



| ̈ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of event requiring this shell company report:



---

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC.

(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its charter and Translation of Registrants Name into English)



---

British Virgin Islands

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

12/F., Kin Teck Industrial Building, 26 Wong Chuk Hang Road, Aberdeen,
Hong Kong

(Address of principal executive offices)



---

Securities registered or to be
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:

Common Shares, par value $0.01 per share

Name of each exchange on which registered:

The New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Not Applicable

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act:

Not Applicable



---

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each
of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

12,223,608 Common
Shares, par value $0.01 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ̈No  þ

If this report is an annual or transition
report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes ̈No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  þ    No ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



|                         |  |                    |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Large accelerated filer ̈ |  | Accelerated filer ̈ |  | Non-accelerated filer þ

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected
to follow.

Item 17 ̈Item 18  þ

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether
the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ̈No  þ



---



---

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|                                                              |  |     
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|                                                              |  | Page
|Item 1.
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |  | 1   
|A.
Directors and senior management                            |  | 1   
|B.
Advisers                                                   |  | 1   
|C.
Auditors                                                   |  | 1   
|                                                              | 
|Item 2.
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable               |  | 1   
|A.
Offer statistics                                           |  | 1   
|B.
Method and expected timetable                              |  | 1   
|                                                              | 
|Item 3.
Key Information                                       |  | 2   
|A.
Selected financial data                                    |  | 2   
|B.
Capitalization and indebtedness                            |  | 3   
|C.
Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds                  |  | 3   
|D.
Risk factors                                               |  | 3   
|                                                              | 
|Item 4.
Information on the Company                            |  | 9   
|A.
History and development of the Company                     |  | 9   
|B.
Business overview                                          |  | 9   
|C.
Organizational structure                                   |  | 21  
|D.
Property, plant and equipment                              |  | 22  
|                                                              | 
|Item 4A.
Unresolved Staff Comments                            |  | 24  
|                                                              | 
|Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects          |  | 24  
|A.
Operating results                                          |  | 24  
|B.
Liquidity and Capital Resources                            |  | 30  
|C.
Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.       |  | 34  
|D.
Trend information                                          |  | 35  
|E.
Off-balance sheet arrangements                             |  | 35  
|F.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations:             |  | 35  
|                                                              | 
|Item 6.
Directors, Senior Management and Employees            |  | 35  
|A.
Directors and senior management                            |  | 35  
|B.
Compensation                                               |  | 37  
|C.
Board practices                                            |  | 37  
|D.
Employees                                                  |  | 38  
|E.
Share ownership                                            |  | 39  
|                                                              | 
|Item 7.
Majority Shareholders and Related Party Transactions  |  | 42  
|A.
Major shareholders                                         |  | 42  
|B.
Related party transactions                                 |  | 43  
|C.
Interests of experts and counsel                           |  | 44  
|                                                              | 
|Item 8.
Financial Information                                 |  | 44  
|A.
Consolidated statements and other financial information    |  | 44  
|B.
Significant changes                                        |  | 48  
|                                                              | 
|Item 9.
The Offer and Listing                                 |  | 50  
|A.
Offer and listing details                                  |  | 50  
|B.
Plan of distribution                                       |  | 50  
|C.
Markets                                                    |  | 50  
|D.
Selling shareholders                                       |  | 50  
|E.
Dilution                                                   |  | 50  
|F.
Expenses of the issue                                      |  | 50  



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                      |  |    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---
|Item 10.
Additional Information                                                       |  | 51 
|A.
Share capital                                                                      |  | 53 
|B.
Memorandum and articles of association                                             |  | 53 
|C.
Material contracts                                                                 |  | 57 
|D.
Exchange controls                                                                  |  | 57 
|E.
Taxation                                                                           |  | 57 
|F.
Dividends and paying agents                                                        |  | 60 
|G.
Statement by experts                                                               |  | 60 
|H.
Documents on display                                                               |  | 60 
|I.
Subsidiary information                                                             |  | 60 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 11.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk                   |  | 60 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 12.
Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities                       |  | 61 
|A.
Debt securities                                                                    |  | 61 
|B.
Warrants and rights                                                                |  | 61 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 13.
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies                              |  | 61 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 14.
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |  | 62 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 15.
Controls and Procedures                                                      |  | 62 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 16.
[Reserved]                                                                   |  | 62 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 16A.
Audit Committee Financial Expert                                            |  | 63 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 16B.
Code of Ethics                                                              |  | 63 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 16C.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services                                      |  | 63 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 17.
Financial Statements                                                         |  | 64 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 18.
Financial Statements                                                         |  | 64 
|                                                                                      | 
|Item 19.
Exhibits                                                                     |  | 64 
|                                                                                      | 
|Index to Consolidated Financial Statements                                            |  | F-2
|Exhibit Index                                                                         |  | E-1



---

##### Table of Contents

The terms Global-Tech, we, the Company, the Group, us and
our as used in this annual report on Form 20-F, or annual report, refer to Global-Tech Appliances Inc., a British Virgin Islands corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where the context requires otherwise. The terms
China, Hong Kong and Macau as used in this annual report refer to the Peoples Republic of China, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China and the Macau Special Administrative Region of China,
respectively.

References throughout this annual report to a fiscal year refer to the fiscal year ended on March 31 of that year. Fiscal
2006, for example, refers to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

Our financial statements are reported in U.S. dollars (see Note 3(n) of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. All references to dollars or $ in this annual report are to U.S. dollars. All
references to HK$ are to Hong Kong dollars.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report contains forward-looking statements that are made under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and involve inherent risks and uncertainties. We use words such as expect, anticipate, project, believe, plan,
intend, seek, should, estimate, future, or variations of such words and other similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could contribute to differences include, but are not limited to, the following: the impact of competitive
products and pricing; demand for new and existing products in our core business; the financial condition of the Companys customers; product demand and market acceptance; the success of new product development and market acceptance especially
in the area of cellular phone components and solutions and for our more technologically complex products; reliance on material customers, suppliers and key strategic alliances; the terms and conditions of customer contracts and purchase orders;
availability and cost of raw materials; the timely and proper execution of certain business plans, including the plan to diversify and transform a portion of our manufacturing capacity to higher-value, technology-oriented products; currency
fluctuations including, but not limited to, the revaluation of the Chinese Renminbi; the imposition of Chinas trading partners of economic sanctions and/or protective tariffs on Chinese manufacturing goods; uncertainties associated with
investments; the regulatory environment; the impact of changing global, political and economic conditions; and other risks detailed in Item 3.DRisk Factors and elsewhere in this annual report. We do not undertake to update our
forward-looking information, or any other information contained or referenced in this annual report to reflect future events and circumstances.

PART I

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers.



|A. | Directors and senior management.
|-- | --------------------------------

Not
applicable.



|B. | Advisers.
|-- | ---------

Not applicable.



|C. | Auditors.
|-- | ---------

Not applicable.

Item 2. Offe
r Statistics and Expected Timetable.



|A. | Offer statistics.
|-- | -----------------

Not applicable.



|B. | Method and expected timetable.
|-- | ------------------------------

Not
applicable.



1



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 3. Key Information.



|A. | Selected financial data.
|-- | ------------------------

The selected consolidated
statement of operations data for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2006 set forth below have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
GAAP and are derived from our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected consolidated statement of operations data for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 and 2003 and the
selected consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2002, March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2004 set forth below have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and are derived from our consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto not included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 5Operating and Financial Review and Prospects, the consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto and other financial information which appear elsewhere in this annual report.



|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- | ------- | ---- | ---- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | -------- | ---- |  | -------- | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                                                                                     |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 31,               |        
|                                                                                                                                                     |  | 2002                                      |         |      | 2003 |   |         | 2004 |  |   | 2005 (3) |      |  | 2006 (4) |        
|                                                                                                                                                     |  | (In thousands, except for per share data) |        
|Statement of operations data:                                                                                                                        |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net sales                                                                                                                                            |  | $                                         | 85,321  |      |      | $ | 75,489  |      |  | $ | 66,901   |      |  | $        | 41,851  |   |  | $ | 73,812  |  
|Cost of goods sold                                                                                                                                   |  |                                           | (65,148 | )    |      |   | (54,906 | )    |  |   | (52,942  | )    |  |          | (44,595 | ) |  |   | (69,817 | )
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Gross profit (loss)                                                                                                                                  |  |                                           | 20,173  |      |      |   | 20,583  |      |  |   | 13,959   |      |  |          | (2,744  | ) |  |   | 3,995   |  
|Selling, general and administrative expenses                                                                                                         |  |                                           | (14,299 | )(1) |      |   | (15,298 | )(1) |  |   | (19,019  | )(1) |  |          | (16,054 | ) |  |   | (18,011 | )
|Other operating income (loss)                                                                                                                        |  |                                           |        |      |      |   |        |      |  |   |         |      |  |          | (810    | ) |  |   | 2,380   |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Operating income (loss)                                                                                                                              |  |                                           | 5,874   |      |      |   | 5,285   |      |  |   | (5,060   | )    |  |          | (19,608 | ) |  |   | (13,636 | )
|Interest expense                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           | (126    | )    |      |   | (57     | )    |  |   | (17      | )    |  |          | (10     | ) |  |   | (55     | )
|Interest income                                                                                                                                      |  |                                           | 1,984   |      |      |   | 1,241   |      |  |   | 851      |      |  |          | 977     |   |  |   | 1,278   |  
|Other income (expenses), net                                                                                                                         |  |                                           | 85      |      |      |   | 228     |      |  |   | 428      |      |  |          | 31      |   |  |   | (846    | )
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes                                                                                         |  |                                           | 7,817   |      |      |   | 6,697   |      |  |   | (3,798   | )    |  |          | (18,610 | ) |  |   | (11,259 | )
|Benefit (provision) for income taxes                                                                                                                 |  |                                           | (1,417  | )    |      |   | (624    | )    |  |   | (108     | )    |  |          | (33     | ) |  |   | 23      |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Income (loss) from continuing operations                                                                                                             |  |                                           | 6,400   |      |      |   | 6,073   |      |  |   | (3,906   | )    |  |          | (18,643 | ) |  |   | (11,236 | )
|Discontinued operations:                                                                                                                             |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss from operations of discontinued thin film electro-luminescent (TFEL) display business, net of applicable income tax of $nil
for 2002 and 2003 |  |                                           | (10,993 | )(2) |      |   | (835    | )(2) |  |   |         |      |  |          |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Gain on disposal of the TFEL display business                                                                                                        |  |                                           |        |      |      |   | 29      | (2)  |  |   |         |      |  |          |        |   |  |   |        |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net income (loss) before minority interests                                                                                                          |  |                                           | (4,593  | )    |      |   | 5,267   |      |  |   | (3,906   | )    |  |          | (18,643 | ) |  |   | (11,236 | )
|Minority interests                                                                                                                                   |  |                                           | 1,570   |      |      |   |        |      |  |   |         |      |  |          | 20      |   |  |   | 13      |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                                                                                    |  | $                                         | (3,023  | )    |      | $ | 5,267   |      |  | $ | (3,906   | )    |  | $        | (18,623 | ) |  | $ | (11,223 | )
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations                                                                        |  | $                                         | 0.53    |      |      | $ | 0.50    |      |  | $ | (0.32    | )    |  | $        | (1.52   | ) |  | $ | (0.92   | )
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share                                                                                                   |  | $                                         | (0.25   | )    |      | $ | 0.43    |      |  | $ | (0.32    | )    |  | $        | (1.52   | ) |  | $ | (0.92   | )
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic and diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding                                                                                      |  |                                           | 12,140  |      |      |   | 12,141  |      |  |   | 12,153   |      |  |          | 12,215  |   |  |   | 12,224  |  
|                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                           |         |      |      |   |         |      |  |   |          |      |  |          |         |   |  |   |         |  

---

|(1) | Includes provisions of $274,000, $556,000 and $669,000, respectively, against a related party loan and the related interest receivable in fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | On November 1, 2002, we announced that our subsidiary, Global Lite Array (BVI) Limited (GLA) entered into an agreement to sell Lite Array, Inc.s
(LA) TFEL display business, including the interest that LA owned in a joint venture manufacturing facility in Jiangmen, China, to the former management of LA. As a result of this agreement, the results of operations for LAs TFEL
display business have been reported as a discontinued operation.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | For fiscal 2005, other operating income (loss) of $810,000 was reclassified from selling, general and administrative expenses and represented a contingent loss provision.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | For fiscal 2006, certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances in order to conform to the current fiscal year presentation.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2



---

##### Table of Contents

The summarized results of discontinued operations are as follows:



|                                             |  |                             |             |   |      |   |          |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ----------- | - | ---- | - | -------- | -
|                                             |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, |            
|                                             |  | 2002                        |             |   | 2003 |  
|Net sales                                    |  | $                           | 444,717     |   |      | $ | 594,621  |  
|Cost of goods sold                           |  |                             | 392,992     |   |      |   | 503,889  |  
|                                             |  |                             |             |   |      |   |          |  
|Gross profit                                 |  |                             | 51,725      |   |      |   | 90,732   |  
|Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |                             | 1,643,896   |   |      |   | 539,099  |  
|Impairment of property, plant and equipment  |  |                             | 258,233     |   |      |   |         |  
|Share of loss of a joint venture             |  |                             | 5,236,684   |   |      |   | 378,646  |  
|Amortization of goodwill                     |  |                             | 328,316     |   |      |   |         |  
|Write-off of goodwill                        |  |                             | 3,611,472   |   |      |   |         |  
|                                             |  |                             |             |   |      |   |          |  
|Operating loss                               |  |                             | (11,026,876 | ) |      |   | (827,013 | )
|Interest income (expense)                    |  |                             | 34,030      |   |      |   | (8,924   | )
|Other income, net                            |  |                             |            |   |      |   | 491      |  
|                                             |  |                             |             |   |      |   |          |  
|Loss from discontinued operations            |  | $                           | (10,992,846 | ) |      | $ | (835,446 | )
|                                             |  |                             |             |   |      |   |          |  

The aggregate assets and liabilities of the discontinued TFEL display business on the date of disposal were
$480,407 and $3,145,432, respectively.



|                     |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |   |       
|-------------------- |  | -------------- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- |  | - | ------
|                     |  | At March 31,  
|                     |  | 2002           |         | 2003 |   | 2004    |  | 2005 |         | 2006
|                     |  | (In thousands)
|Balance sheet data:  |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |   |       
|Working capital1     |  | $              | 64,931  |      | $ | 72,356  |  | $    | 73,672  |      | $ | 58,167  |  | $ | 53,071
|Total assets         |  |                | 123,273 |      |   | 123,548 |  |      | 122,286 |      |   | 104,013 |  |   | 98,080
|Net assets2          |  |                | 106,500 |      |   | 111,341 |  |      | 110,033 |      |   | 90,273  |  |   | 79,349
|Total debt3          |  |                | 1,062   |      |   | 828     |  |      | 422     |      |   | 38      |  |   | 38    
|Shareholders equity |  |                | 106,500 |      |   | 111,341 |  |      | 110,033 |      |   | 90,261  |  |   | 79,349

---

|1 | Working capital is the excess of current assets over current liabilities.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2 | Net assets are the excess of total assets over total liabilities.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------

|3 | Total debt is the summation of short-term borrowings, current portion of long-term bank
borrowings and long-term bank borrowings.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|B. | Capitalization and indebtedness.
|-- | --------------------------------

Not
applicable.



|C. | Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds.
|-- | ------------------------------------------

Not applicable.



|D. | Risk factors.
|-- | -------------

Compliance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We are required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 404) to include a report that asserts managements responsibility over internal control,
identifies the framework used to evaluate internal control, and provides an assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting beginning with our annual report on Form 20-F for our fiscal year ending on
or after July 15, 2007. Further, Section 404 requires that the Companys external auditor attest to, and report on, managements assessment of internal control. A copy of the attestation report must be filed along with the annual
report on Form 20-F. Although we are conducting a review of our internal control structure and procedures over financial reporting to comply with the requirements of Section 404, there is no



3



---

##### Table of Contents

assurance that our external auditor will ultimately be satisfied with our internal control structure and procedures over our financial reporting, and
therefore may decline to attest to managements assessment of internal control or even issue a qualified report. This could result in non-compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations and/or a decline of
our stock value due to the loss of investors confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, and the Company may be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require the
commitment of additional financial and management resources.

Foreign sales, operations and assets. Substantially all of our
products are currently manufactured in China and over 90% of the net book value of our total fixed assets is located there. We sell products to companies based principally in North America, Europe and Australia. Consequently, our international
operations and sales may be subject to the following risks, among others:



| |  |  | political and economic risks, including political instability, currency controls and exchange rate fluctuations;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in import/export regulations;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in the rate of inflation; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in tariff and freight rates.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------

In particular, changes in tariff
structures or other trade policies could adversely affect our customers or suppliers or decrease our competitors costs of production.

Renminbi revaluation. We sell a majority of our products into the U.S. market through our subsidiaries in Hong Kong and also Macau. These sales are generally denominated in U.S. dollars. The majority of our expenses, including
salaries and wages and other production and administrative costs are denominated in Hong Kong dollars and Chinese Renminbi. Although certain raw materials, material components and capital equipment are purchased using a variety of currencies
including the U.S. dollar, Chinese Renminbi, Japanese yen and EURO, the majority are purchased with Hong Kong dollars. The Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the U.S. dollar at a rate of approximately $7.8 Hong Kong dollars to US$1.0. To date, in the
aggregate, we have not been significantly affected by exchange rate fluctuations and therefore have not hedged our positions.

From 1998
until 2005, the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) kept the Renminbis exchange rate against the U.S. dollar steady at approximately 8.3 Renminbi to the U.S. dollar. In March 2005, Chinas Premier introduced a number of
conditions, including but not limited to, Chinese financial and economic stability that must be achieved before China could implement greater exchange flexibility. At that time the Premier indicated that the Renminbi was likely to be revalued, but
gave no timetable for such revaluation.

On July 21, 2005, the PBOC decided to abandon its policy of pegging the Renminbi to the U.S.
dollar and instead decided to link the Renminbi to a basket of currencies. The PBOC also strengthened the exchange rate of the Renminbi to 8.11 to the U.S. dollar from 8.28 as the Chinese government took its first step towards a floating currency.
This reform will eventually make China products more expensive for U.S. companies. To the extent our operations are based in China, we are exposed to foreign exchange risk with respect to the Renminbi, which could ultimately negatively impact our
financial condition and results of operations.

Government regulation. Our operations and assets in China are subject to
significant political, economic, legal and other uncertainties. Any of the following could result from policy changes by the Chinese government and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition:



| |  |  | legal or regulatory changes, or changes in interpretation of current laws or regulations;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | new labor laws restricting flexibility in employment and added social security costs;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | confiscatory or increased taxation;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | restrictions on currency conversion, imports and sources of supply;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | import duties;
| | - |  | --------------



| |  |  | currency devaluations; or
| | - |  | -------------------------



| |  |  | expropriation of private enterprise.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



4



---

##### Table of Contents

Under its current leadership, the Chinese government has been pursuing economic reform policies,
including the encouragement of private economic activity and greater economic decentralization. In 2001, after 15 years of negotiations, China was admitted to the World Trade Organization, (WTO), and is now entitled to the full trading
rights afforded a WTO member country. There can be no assurance, however, that China will continue to pursue and implement favorable economic reform policies, that such policies will be successful if pursued or that such policies will not be
significantly altered from time to time without notice.

The municipal authorities in each township in China have discretion to impose or
waive a large number of fees and taxes including value-added tax, stamp duty, licenses and permits. In the Companys manufacturing location, it is subject to the laws and regulations of the township of Dongguan, Guangdong Province and the PRC.
In the early years of our operations in Dongguan, the majority of the local fees and taxes were waived or abated as a result of negotiation with local authorities. In recent years, however, our requests for waivers and abatements have received less
favorable consideration and we believe that we may incur a significant increase in fees and taxes over the coming years.

Cancellation or delays in purchase orders placed by our customers. Sales to our customers are primarily based on purchase orders and forecasts we received. We generally purchase and stock raw materials and components upon
receiving orders; however, we will purchase the raw materials and components for certain customers based on their rolling forecasts. When there is an acute shortage of raw materials and components such as plastic resins and metal, we are required to
purchase such raw materials on an occasional or continuous basis in the expectation of receiving purchase orders for products that use these raw materials and components. In the event the actual orders are delayed or cancelled, we would have
increased inventory levels or possible write-downs of our raw material inventory that could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Outbreak of epidemic diseases. Any recurrence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Avian Influenza in China could also significantly negatively impact our manufacturing plant
located in Dongguan, China. If our Hong Kong based supervisory staff is unable to travel or if other labor problems arise, it could seriously disrupt our manufacturing operation and cause significant delays in production. In addition, if the
outbreak of Avian Influenza in Asian countries, including Vietnam, South Korea and Japan were to spread to Hong Kong and China, where our executive office and operations facilities are located, there may be disruptions to our business.

Cost and availability of labor. There is an emerging trend of a shortage of supply of migrant workers in China, particularly in
Guangdong Province where our factory is located. Both in numbers and in skill, the labor force in China cannot keep up with the current speed of economic development. We have adjusted salaries and fringe benefits in order to attract and retain an
adequate labor force. In the coming year, we expect that both a potential shortage of labor and increasing costs will impact our manufacturing operations and further believe the appreciation in value of the Renminbi in relation to the U.S. dollar
will also increase our costs in recruiting and retaining a skilled work force.

Increase in effective tax rates. The Company
is subject to a lower overall effective tax rate than some U.S. domiciled corporations because of the location of its business operations. We are incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and have subsidiaries incorporated in the British Virgin
Islands, Hong Kong, Macau, China and the United States. Our executive and administrative offices are located in Hong Kong and Macau and our manufacturing facilities are in China. Our customers are located primarily in the United States. Changes in
tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, one of our subsidiaries in China, Dongguan Wing Shing Electrical Products Factory Company Limited (Dongguan Wing Shing), was exempted from income
tax for two years (1999 and 2000) followed by a 50% exemption for the next three years (2001 to 2003). Commencing January 1, 2004, Dongguan Wing Shing is subjected to the full tax rate of 27%. Dongguan Wing Shing houses our manufacturing
facilities that incur a significant portion of manufacturing overhead. The finished products manufactured at Dongguan Wing Shing are sold to our other subsidiaries. We do not believe application of the full tax rate will have a significant impact on
our financial condition and results of operations. In fiscal 2004, we established a new subsidiary, Dongguan Lite Array Company Limited (Dongguan Lite Array), which is also exempt from income tax for the two-year period commencing with
its first profitable year and followed by a 50% exemption for the next three years. Dongguan Lite Array has yet to attain its first profitable year. Our subsidiary in Macau, Pentalpha Macau Commercial Offshore Limited, is not subject to taxation in
Macau in accordance with Macau tax regulations, but there is no assurance that the Hong Kong Inland Revenue Department (HKIRD) will not seek to impose taxation on income generated in Macau, which could result in an increase in our
effective tax rate.

In fiscal 2005, our U.S. subsidiary, Lite Array, Inc, a Delaware corporation (Lite Array), engaged in the
trading of raw materials for small molecule organic light emitting diode (OLED) technology for our other subsidiaries. The sales amount was immaterial and we have ceased trading of OLED products subsequent to the balance sheet date. There should be
no taxable income recognized as the sales amount was not sufficient to cover the expenses incurred during the period and there were tax losses carried



5



---

##### Table of Contents

forward from prior years. At this stage, we do not believe that our current method of operations subjects us to material U.S. taxes. There can be no
assurance, however, that U.S. taxes will not be imposed on an additional portion of our income. The imposition of material U.S. income taxes could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Dependence on major customers. Sales to five major customers accounted for 89.9%, 86.9% and 84.4% of our net sales during each of fiscal
2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. Royal Appliance Manufacturing Company (Royal), a floor care company, continued to be our largest customer in fiscal 2006. Sales to Royal accounted for 40.4% of our net sales in fiscal 2006, as compared
to 62.7% of our net sales in fiscal 2005. Over the last two years, we have established a business relationship with The Electrolux Group, which was formerly known as The Eureka Company (Electrolux). Sales to Electrolux accounted for
34.1% of our net sales in fiscal 2006 as compared to 10.3% of our net sales in fiscal 2005. Neither Royal, nor Electrolux is contractually obligated to purchase floor care products from us, and we only sell to each of them on the basis of purchase
orders.

On December 17, 2002, Techtronic Industries Limited (TTI) and Royal jointly announced that they had entered into
a definitive agreement for TTI to acquire Royal. Effective April 23, 2003, TTI announced a merger with Royal. Following the completion of the merger, Royal is operating as a wholly-owned subsidiary of TTI. TTI, like the Company, is a full-line
electrical products manufacturer based in Hong Kong and China and eventually is likely to produce all of Royals products. We have continued offering Royal favorable pricing and payment terms in an attempt to maintain business with them. We
cannot predict when TTI will begin producing all of Royals products and cease buying from us and we have received no formal or informal notice to that effect. We believe such a result is probable and likely to occur in the reasonably near
future and there will be a significant adverse impact on our financial position when we lose this customer unless we are able to replace it with another major floor care company.

Although the relative percentage of net sales to each of our major customers changes each year, we expect to be dependent on between two and four major
customers for the foreseeable future. Although we may enter into contracts with general terms for the purchase of products with certain of our major customers, sales are generally made pursuant to purchase orders received by us from time to time.
Therefore, there can be no assurance of the level of sales to any of these major customers in the future. The loss of any one of these major customers, particularly Royal or Electrolux, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.

Increases in cost of raw materials. We are dependent upon outside suppliers for all
of our raw material needs, including plastic resins, and are subject to price increases in these raw materials. The plastic resins we use are derived from natural gas liquids, and prices of these plastic resins have fluctuated in line with the
fluctuation in natural gas and crude oil prices, as well as the relative capacity, supply and demand for the resin and petrochemical intermediates from which plastic resins are produced. During fiscal 2006, the price of plastic resin increased 25%
overall and may continue to increase as a result of the surge in crude oil prices. We have no long-term supply contracts for the purchase of plastic resin, but we generally maintain a 90-day supply. We have limited ability to increase product prices
in response to plastic resin or other material cost increases. We closely monitor crude oil prices that normally affect the price of plastic resin and our inventory levels to ensure we can complete our orders on hand. If our reserves are not
sufficient for our production requirements, we have to buy plastic resin at potentially higher prices in order to meet our delivery schedules. There can be no assurance that we will be able to purchase the necessary quantities of plastic resin and
other raw materials at reasonable prices. Any future increase in the cost of plastic resins or other raw materials or our continuing inability to pass the increased cost of these or other raw materials onto our customers or to purchase sufficient
quantities of plastic resins will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For more information, please see Item 11  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

New product category. In 2005, we entered the consumer electronic products business concentrating on display-oriented products. Our
subsidiary, Global Display Limited, developed a range of consumer products incorporating high-definition flat panel displays (FPDs) that utilized liquid crystal displays (LCDs), plasma display panels (PDP), liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS), optical,
and digital display technologies. Lite Array, Inc., another subsidiary of ours, had been developing a range of display modules utilizing proprietary OLED technology. Since we had no commercial success in these new product categories and there was no
assurance that we would do so in the future, we were required under U.S. GAAP to provide for impairment of our long-lived assets since the carrying amount of our long-lived assets exceeded the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result
from the assets use and eventual disposition. In addition, we had to write-down the value of the related inventories to market value. Any future impairment or write-down of inventory arising from a lack of commercial success in a new product
category would have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

New products and rapid technological change. The technology incorporated in many of our
products, particularly consumer electronics is characterized by rapid change in the marketplace. In addition, the emergence of new technologies can quickly render existing products obsolete or unmarketable. Our ability to anticipate changes in
technology and industry standards or consumer demand and successfully develop and introduce new or enhanced products that gain market acceptance will be a critical factor in our ability to grow and remain competitive. There can be no assurance that
we will timely or successfully complete the development of new or enhanced products or successfully manage the transition from one product release to the next, or that our future products will achieve market acceptance. The failure to realize such
goals could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Proprietary technology;
patent protection. We hold a number of patents registered in various jurisdictions, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and France, and hold the exclusive rights with respect to certain technology included in our
products. We rely primarily upon a combination of trademark, copyright, know-how, trade secrets and contractual restrictions to protect our intellectual property rights. We believe that such measures afford only limited protection and, accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the steps taken by us to protect these proprietary rights will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of the technology or the independent development of similar technology by others. Despite our efforts to protect
our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary.

Indemnification liability for patent infringement. In contracts relating to original design manufacture (ODM) products, we typically agree to indemnify customers for all liabilities, costs,
expenses or damages payable by our customers based upon a claim of patent infringement by an ODM product manufactured by us, whether such amount is awarded by a court or agreed to in settlement negotiations. The cost of any such customer indemnity
or of responding to any infringement assertion could be significant, regardless of whether the assertion is valid. On behalf of a former customer, we are currently appealing a patent infringement judgment relating to a deep fryer model. See
Item 8.AFinancial InformationLegal Proceedings. No assurance can be given that this current infringement claim will be resolved in our favor or that other parties will not assert infringement claims against us in the future
with respect to that, or other products. An adverse decision in any such legal proceeding could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Product liability. We may be subject to substantial product liability costs if claims arise out of problems associated with our products.
We provide a warranty for limited manufacturing defects to certain of our customers. We do not provide warranties, however, that extend to the ultimate consumers of the product. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that we will not be subject to
a suit by a consumer who uses one of our products if the product causes an injury to any person or does not perform properly. We maintain product liability insurance in an amount we believe is sufficient. There can be no assurance, however, that our
insurance coverage will be adequate or that all product liability claims will be covered by our current product liability insurance. In addition, these policies must be renewed annually. To date, we have not been subject to any material product
liability claim. While we have been able to obtain product liability insurance in the past, premiums continue to increase in cost and may not be available in the future on terms acceptable to us, if at all. The failure to maintain insurance
coverage, or a successful claim against us not covered by or in excess of the insurance coverage, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, product liability claims, regardless
of their merit or eventual outcome, may have a material adverse effect on our business reputation.

Product safety; delays in
regulatory approval. Our products include several electrical components, which may cause fires if not properly installed. Although we have experienced no significant safety problems with our products in the past and believe that our products
do not present safety risks, there can be no assurance that safety problems will not occur in the future. Prior to the commercial introduction of our products into the market, we always obtain approval of our products by at least one of the
organizations engaged in testing product safety. The application process for securing these approvals requires a significant commitment of time and resources by our technical staff and could delay the introduction of our products. Our inability to
obtain regulatory approval within the projected timeframe for commercial introduction of our products or other product introduction delays could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks of manufacturing in China; property damage. All of our products are manufactured at our factory complex located in the
township of Dongguan, Guangdong Province of China. In addition to the political and economic risks of operations in China, firefighting and disaster relief assistance in China is not as sophisticated as in Western countries. We currently maintain
property damage insurance in the aggregate of approximately $72.6 million which covers our inventory, furniture, equipment, machinery and buildings and also maintain business interruption insurance in the aggregate of approximately $18.9 million for
losses relating to our factory. Material damage to, or the loss of, our facilities due to fire, severe weather, flood or other act of God or cause, even if insured against, would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

Impact of environmental regulations. We are subject to Chinese laws that regulate
environmental quality, the utilization of natural resources and the reduction of pollution. Environmental regulation in China is currently evolving and could become more stringent or more stringently enforced in the future, which could require us to
make substantial additional capital expenditures in the future to maintain compliance. As a manufacturer, we are subject to annual inspections by the local branch of the State Environment Protection Administration (SEPA). Although
compliance with environmental regulations has not had a material adverse effect on us in the past, failure to comply with these laws or to pass an inspection in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.

Dependence on distributions from operating subsidiaries and currency fluctuation. We have no direct
business operations, other than our ownership of our subsidiaries. If we decide to pay dividends in the future, as a holding company, our ability to pay dividends and meet other obligations would depend upon the receipt of dividends or other
payments from our operating subsidiaries and our other holdings and investments. In addition, our operating subsidiaries may also be subject to restrictions on their ability to make distributions to us, including, among others, restrictive covenants
in loan agreements, restrictions on the conversion of local currency into U.S. dollars or other hard currency and other regulatory restrictions. Since we do not engage in hedging or other similar transactions, extraordinary currency fluctuations
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Concentration of
ownership. Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited, a British Virgin Islands company (Wing Shing Holdings), beneficially owns approximately 61.8% of our outstanding common shares (issued net of treasury shares). The share ownership
of Wing Shing Holdings is held 60% by Kwong Ho Sham and 40% by John Sham, both of whom are directors. Voting control of Wing Shing Holdings is held approximately 42.9% by Kwong Ho Sham and approximately 57.1% by John Sham. As a result, Wing Shing
Holdings and its shareholders are in a position to control our activities and policies, including possessing the voting power to elect our Board of Directors and approve all matters requiring shareholder approval and the ability to generally direct
our affairs.

Service and enforcement of legal process. We are organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands. All
but one of our directors and executive officers reside outside the United States, and most of our assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for investors to effect service of process on these
persons within the United States or to enforce against these persons judgments obtained in U.S. courts, including judgments predicated on the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States. In particular, judgments of
U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States may be difficult to enforce in British Virgin Islands courts and it is uncertain whether British Virgin Islands courts will enter
judgments in original actions brought in British Virgin Islands courts predicated solely upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States.

British Virgin Islands company. Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association and by the International
Business Companies Act of the British Virgin Islands. Principles of law relating to such matters as the validity of corporate procedures, the fiduciary duties of management and the rights of our shareholders may differ from those that would apply if
we were incorporated in the United States or another jurisdiction. The rights of shareholders under British Virgin Islands law are not as clearly established as are the rights of shareholders in many other jurisdictions. Thus, our shareholders may
have more relative difficulty protecting their interests against certain actions by our board of directors or principal shareholders than similarly situated shareholders of a corporation incorporated in another jurisdiction. Please see details under
Item 10  Additional Information.

Macau subsidiary operations. We established a subsidiary in Macau to buy
and sell products to our customers. No treaty exists between Macau and the United States providing for reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. However, the courts of Macau are generally prepared to accept a debt due and actions may then be
commenced in Macau for recovery subject to specific preconditions being satisfied regarding the authenticity of the foreign judgment.

Enforcement of a foreign judgment in Macau may also be limited or affected by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, arrangement, and moratorium or similar laws relating to or affecting creditors rights generally, but will be
subject to statutory time limitation within which proceedings may be brought.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

Director actions without shareholder approval. Under our memorandum and articles of
association and the laws of the British Virgin Islands, our memorandum and articles of association may be amended by our Board of Directors without shareholder approval. This includes:



| |  |  | increasing or reducing our authorized capital,
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | authorizing the issuance of different classes of shares, including preference shares, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | increasing or reducing the par value of our shares.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------

Our
ability to amend our memorandum and articles of association by a resolution of directors or a resolution of members could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of the Company without any further action by the
shareholders including, but not limited to, a tender offer to purchase our common shares at a premium over then current market prices.

Our status as a foreign private issuer. We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As such, we are exempt from certain of the reporting requirements under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and corporate governance standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Because of these exemptions, investors are not afforded the same protection or information generally available to investors
holding shares in public companies organized in the United States or traded on the NYSE. However, the NYSE does not exempt foreign private issuers from independent audit committee requirements and we are required to disclose any significant ways our
current corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies under the NYSE listing standards. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer must notify the NYSE if one of our executive officers becomes aware of any material
non-compliance with any applicable NYSE corporate governance listing standards to the NYSE. Please see Item 10-Additional Information for more information.

Reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. No treaty exists between Hong Kong and the United States providing for the reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. Accordingly, Hong Kong courts might
not enforce judgments predicated on the federal securities laws of the United States, whether arising from actions brought in the United States or, if permitted, in Hong Kong.

Delisting of our common shares. Our common shares are listed on the NYSE and the Company is subject to certain NYSE continued listing
standards. Under the applicable quantitative continued listing standards, the Company would be considered below criteria and our common shares would be subject to delisting procedures if, among other things, (i) the Companys
average market capitalization is less than $75 million over a 30 trading-day period and shareholders equity is less than $75 million or if (ii) the average market capitalization is less than $25 million over a 30 day trading-day period.
Delisting of our common shares could negatively affect the price and liquidity of our common shares and could impair our ability to raise capital in the future. By a letter dated August 18, 2006, the NYSE advised us of the Companys
potential non-compliance with these standards in the future. The Company cannot provide any assurance that it will be able to continue to satisfy the requirements of the NYSEs continued listing standards.

Item 4. Information on the Company.



|A. | History and development of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------

Our legal name is Global-Tech Appliances Inc., and we were organized as an international business company under the laws of the British Virgin Islands on May 2, 1991 and went public on April 7, 1998. The address of our registered
office in the British Virgin Islands is TrustNet Chambers, P.O. Box 3444, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands, and the telephone number at that address is (284) 494-5296.

The address of our principal place of business, and the location of our executive and administrative offices, is 12/F., Kin Teck Industrial Building, 26
Wong Chuk Hang Road, Aberdeen, Hong Kong, and the telephone number at that address is (852) 2814-0601. Our e-mail address is investorrelations@global-webpage.com. Our website is located at http://www.global-webpage.com.



|B. | Business overview.
|-- | ------------------

Our core business
is designing, manufacturing and selling small electrical household appliances to brand marketers in developed countries. While our products and product categories have changed over time, and will continue to change in the future, the total market
that we serve remains relatively stable. It is our aim to offer reliable, high-quality manufacturing as a partner to U.S. and European companies that need to procure finished products from the Far East for competitive reasons, but also need to
protect their brands reputations.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

In our core business, we historically categorized the appliances we manufacture by function. Our current
product categories are floor care products and kitchen appliance products. In both categories, and with respect to the individual products within the category, there are major brands and private label brands competing for retail shelf space and
consumer purchase. While our core business, as a whole, has remained fairly stable in the developed countries, it is subject to significant shifts in demand for particular product categories and individual products within such categories.

In the past, we manufactured personal care products, the least complex category in small electrical appliances. However, by 2001, we began
to become less competitive in this product category compared to other Chinese manufacturers that did not have a Hong Kong staff or development programs and we decided to de-emphasize this product category and begin to redirect our efforts. At the
same time, we expanded our electric motor expertise and entered the floor care product category. Floor care products require sophisticated and complex manufacturing equipment and processes and we made significant investments to upgrade our facility
to meet our customers requirements.

Our initial floor care customers were Royal Appliance (Royal) and Sharper Image. Subsequently,
we started to manufacture extractors for Eureka (part of the Electrolux group). For competitive reasons we limited our customer base to the principal players, Royal and Eureka. Since both of these customers were themselves also manufacturers, our
opportunities were limited to stock keeping units (SKUs) that we could produce more cost effectively than they could.

One of
our key strategies that historically aided our business success was our emphasis on Original Design Manufacturing (ODM) as an alternative to contract manufacturing. We designed, engineered and tooled our own products and offered them for
sale to well-known household appliance companies for sale under their own brand names. This was particularly effective with kitchen appliances since brand marketers could introduce our products to the market with minimum upfront investment on their
part and satisfy the retailers need for differentiation and novelty. However in recent years with the continuing pricing pressures, maintaining an ODM infrastructure of designers and engineers has become cost prohibitive. As a result, unless
we know a customers particular need for a product, we can no longer afford to allocate the resources needed for engineering, prototyping or tooling. Thus, in our core appliance business, we are now concentrating on being a high quality
Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM).

A significant portion of our sales are made in U.S. dollars. U.S. and European sales
for our products accounted for 73.8% and 11.3%, respectively, of our net sales during fiscal 2006, as compared to 86.0% and 7.1%, respectively, of our net sales during fiscal 2005 and 83.9% and 6.7%, respectively, of our net sales during fiscal
2004. In fiscal 2006, Asian sales accounted for $10.4 million or 14.7% of our net sales as compared to $2.2 million or 5.3% of our net sales in fiscal 2005. The increase in Asian Sales was due to the sales to PRC-based cellular phone manufacturers
of CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) camera modules (CCMs), which we started shipping in the second quarter of fiscal 2006.

Small household appliances are sold through a variety of distribution channels, including mass merchandisers, specialty retailers, warehouse clubs, drug store chains, direct marketing organizations and department
stores. In the United States, mass merchandisers, such as Wal-Mart and Target, have become the dominant retailers of small household appliances and we believe that a similar trend has evolved in Western Europe. Generally, mass merchandisers prefer
to purchase from a limited number of well-known household appliance companies that can provide a variety of high quality, innovative, brand name products on a timely and cost-effective basis. Accordingly, household appliance companies are focusing
their resources on marketing and distribution, while increasingly outsourcing engineering and manufacturing.

We continue to acquire new
technologies in an effort to expand our capabilities in manufacturing finished products. These transactions are part of our long-term business strategy to gradually diversify and transform a portion of our manufacturing facility into producing
higher-value, technology-oriented products that will allow us to leverage our existing development and technical management staff in Hong Kong, as well as our manufacturing infrastructure in China.

Late in fiscal 2003, we began exploring opportunities in display-oriented products, particularly those utilizing flat-panel liquid crystal displays
(LCDs). We concluded that investing in the capital equipment to produce flat-panel modules was not as attractive as sourcing the panels, software, and other electronic components while we focused on utilizing our manufacturing experience and
capabilities to produce highquality, competitive products. In pursuit of this venture, we established a separate subsidiary, Global Display, to develop and market a wide range of such display-oriented products with its own dedicated and
experienced technical and marketing staff focused initially on developing flat-panel high definition televisions (HDTVs) incorporating plasma or thin film transistor liquid crystal displays (TFT-LCDs).



10



---

##### Table of Contents

In fiscal 2005, we also acquired a majority controlling interest in Winway Technology Development Limited
(Winway). Winway established its own marketing network for consumer electronic products in certain Asian countries including China.

As a result of a dramatic decline in prices for flat panel televisions in the U.S. and Europe and our late entry into this venture, we were not successful in securing major customers for our consumer LCD televisions, resulting in our
inventory of LCD Panels devaluing on a monthly basis. Towards the end of fiscal 2005, we realized that a change of strategy was needed and ceased our commercial efforts with respect to flat panel LCD televisions. During 2006, we liquidated our
remaining flat panel display assets and reduced our workforce. Additionally due to the falling market prices for OLED displays, we decided to revise our OLED strategy. Recently, we entered into a joint venture with Anwell Technologies Limited
(Anwell), a public company in Singapore to develop a more cost effective process for producing OLED equipment rather than just marketing OLED displays.

Between exiting the displays venture and the OLED program, we have taken significant impairment charges but dramatically reduced our overhead and development costs, which should reduce our fixed and SG&A costs by
approximately $7.5 million per annum on an ongoing basis.

In late fiscal 2005, we established a new entity, Global Optics Limited, to
market CCMs and to develop household electronic products incorporating optical systems. In fiscal 2006 our sales of CCMs were approximately $5.8 million and we introduced our first home security product to the marketplace.

We believe the opportunity to sell CCMs and other electronic components to cellular phone and PDA manufacturers in the PRC is a promising business for us
albeit currently at commodity type margins. At present we source the sensors and lenses so that we can apply our resources to operate a top quality clean room in our manufacturing facility in the PRC for low-cost assembly and concurrently
concentrate on product enhancements with a team of experienced electronic and optical engineers.

Business Strategy

It is our intention to de-emphasize unprofitable product categories with lower profit margins that merely maintain sales volume and to expand into more
technologically advanced product categories. In recent years, we have endeavored to develop new business opportunities and plan to continue seeking out business opportunities that take advantage of our engineering and design expertise, top quality
processes and low-cost manufacturing infrastructure.

Core Business

Our business strategy is to be the highest quality, low cost manufacturer of complex small electrical appliances as well as being a reliable partner for a
few brand marketers. We have invested in a number of core competencies to support our strategy, as well as efficiency and productivity improvements to provide adequate returns.

We are attempting to establish cooperative relationships with our principal customers to save them money and improve their competitiveness. Since our two
largest customers are manufacturers themselves we have to prove working with us gives them an economic benefit. We believe this can be done with a combination of the following:

Vertically-integrated, low-cost manufacturing. We maintain our principal production facility in Dongguan, China, which is set up as a
vertically-integrated manufacturing operation. We have made a significant investment, and continue to invest, in sophisticated machinery to create the tooling and components used in the manufacturing process. This machinery, along with the use of
relatively inexpensive labor, enables us to produce efficiently many of our components and to assemble these components to create finished products. We also invest where necessary in automation to offset increased labor costs. By locating our
manufacturing facilities in close proximity to Hong Kong, we are also able to leverage both the transportation resources and engineering and managerial expertise available in Hong Kong. We believe that our investment in manufacturing machinery,
combined with the strategic use of labor and management resources, allows us to provide customers with high-quality, low-cost products in an efficient and timely manner.

Commitment to quality. We are committed to manufacturing high-quality products and we achieve this goal by engaging in quality control testing at each stage of the manufacturing process. We are able to
assure the reliability and consistent performance of



11



---

##### Table of Contents

our products by testing both the individual components and the fully-assembled finished product. Our quality management system has been certified as
conforming to the standards of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The ISO, based in Geneva, Switzerland, publishes a series of standards for quality management and quality assurance with the goal of providing
guidelines for consistent practices worldwide. Our quality control system has been certified by Det Norske Veritas QA Ltd., an accredited unit of the ISO, as conforming to Quality System Standard ISO 9001 for the manufacture of electrical household
appliances.

Expansion of manufacturing capabilities. We invest either directly or indirectly in all the equipment needed to
manufacture our products. In recent years, we have added die casting and electric motor manufacturing to our processes. We have built specialty life testing rigs and clean rooms as well as investing in major injection molding equipment to allow us
to make large plastic parts.

Cost reduction engineering. We dedicate our limited development engineering resources to
implementing our customers detailed designs and working on cost reduction programs concentrating on process efficiency, material substitution and weight reduction. Typically engineered cost reductions are passed through to our customers or
shared to compensate us for a portion of our material cost increases.

Electronic Components and Electronics Products

Our strategy for electronic components evolved from our efforts to sell OLED displays to cellular phone manufacturers in the PRC. Our
targeted second tier customers, however, were more interested in incorporating cameras and video using their existing STN-LCD screens than paying a premium for an OLED screen despite its better performance. We therefore diverted some of
our technical resources from our display group and hired experienced process engineers in the PRC to enter the CCM business.

Partnership with vendors.The sensors and lenses utilized in CMOS cameras are highly specialized and only available from a few vendors. We have established relationships with a major sensor company that views our PRC
based operation as a good partner to access many of the PRC cellular phone manufacturers. Additionally we receive technical support from our lens and connector suppliers.

Innovative product development.We research applications for CCMs either as a component or a critical feature of an electronic product. We have identified home security devices that incorporate a camera
as an attractive area to focus on and are devoting part of our development efforts to this market. We have also hired an experienced engineering team in Taiwan to focus on developing more sophisticated CCMs that incorporate such features as
automatic focusing.

Superior quality PRC based manufacturing.Utilizing our clean room expertise initially learnt
from OLED production, we have been able to produce CCMs with high quality standards, which allows some of our PRC-based customers to purchase CCMs in the PRC rather than importing them from Korea or Taiwan.

Expansion of manufacturing capabilities.We have invested in all of the equipment needed to assemble modules in a Class 1,000 clean
room. We have added precision mounting equipment and a full range of testing apparatus to support and maintain high quality.

Focus
on home security.We are in the process of developing consumer products for the home security market that incorporate cameras, optics, recording devices and outsourced proprietary software linking the systems. Our first home security
product, the Intellicorder was introduced in 2006.

Display-Oriented Products

Late in fiscal 2003, we began exploring opportunities in display-oriented products, particularly those utilizing flat-panel LCD displays. We concluded
that investing in the capital equipment required to produce such displays was not as attractive as sourcing the panels, software, and other electronic components while we focused on utilizing our manufacturing experience and capabilities to produce
highquality finished, competitive products.

In pursuit of this venture, we established a separate subsidiary, Global Display, to
develop and market a wide range of such display-oriented products with its own dedicated and experienced technical and marketing staff focused initially on developing flat-panel high definition televisions (HDTVs) incorporating plasma or thin film
transistor liquid crystal displays (TFT LCDs).



12



---

##### Table of Contents

In fiscal 2005, we also acquired a majority controlling interest in Winway Technology Development Limited
(Winway). Winway established its own marketing network for consumer electronic products in certain Asian countries including China.

As a result of a dramatic decline in prices for flat-panel LCD televisions in the U.S. and Europe and our late entry into this venture, we were not successful in securing major customers for our consumer televisions, resulting in our
inventory devaluing on a monthly basis as market prices steadily declined. Towards the end of fiscal 2005, we realized that a change of strategy was needed and ceased our commercial efforts with respect to flat-panel LCD televisions.

Lite Arrays OLED

Since
the acquisition of Lite Array, we have been active in the development of OLED technology utilizing licensed proprietary single molecule technology. We have built a clean room, acquired a development line and related know-how and started producing
OLED display samples for customer evaluation as well as providing them with small quantities of displays from contracted manufacturers in Taiwan and Korea.

Subsequently, however we determined that it was unlikely that we could make a return from our investment in OLED due to the significant capital investment required, market prices decreasing and the ongoing burden of a
minimum royalty structure that we could not recover in our pricing.

We, therefore, ceased any plans to manufacture OLED displays using the
licensed technology and entered into a venture with Anwell, a public company in Singapore, to develop a more cost effective process for producing OLED equipment rather than continuing to only manufacture OLED displays.

Products

Currently, we design and manufacture a
number of small electrical household appliances. During fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006, ODM products accounted for 24.5%, 26.1% and 18.3% respectively, of our net sales after netting off the tooling income, with the balance of our net sales being from
contract manufacturing performed according to product specifications provided by customers. In fiscal 2006, we produced approximately 4 million appliance units including both ODM and OEM products.

The following table reflects our net sales for each significant product category in fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006:



|                      |  |                             |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                      |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
|                      |  | 2004                        |        | 2005 |   | 2006  
|                      |  | (In thousands)             
|Product category:     |  |                             |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Floor care products   |  | $                           | 49,734 |      | $ | 29,623 |  | $ | 54,571
|Kitchen appliances    |  |                             | 12,044 |      |   | 7,629  |  |   | 7,316 
|Electronic components |  |                             |       |      |   |       |  |   | 5,917 
|Others (1)            |  |                             | 5,123  |      |   | 4,599  |  |   | 6,008 
|                      |  |                             |        |      |   |        |  |   |       
|Total                 |  | $                           | 66,901 |      | $ | 41,851 |  | $ | 73,812
|                      |  |                             |        |      |   |        |  |   |       

---

|(1) | Includes garment care and travel products, environmental care products, personal and health care products and accessories for each of our product categories and display product
samples as well as tooling income for procurement, design and manufacturing of tooling and molds.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Floor care
products. We started manufacturing floor care products in fiscal 2000. Our floor care products include hand-held steam vacuum cleaners, upright vacuum cleaners and extractors. Floor care products represented 74.3%, 70.8% and 73.9% of our net
sales in fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively. As a contract manufacturer, our sales in this category have been principally driven by our product quality, testing systems, sophisticated electric motor production, and our tooling and injection
molding machinery for large plastic parts which are already in place. We believe that we will continue contract manufacturing for our two key customers for the next few years but will continue having difficulty improving margins.

Kitchen appliances. We began manufacturing kitchen appliances in 1992, and focused much of our ODM design and development efforts in this
area over the next ten years. We manufactured a broad line of kitchen appliances, including blenders, breadmakers, coffeemakers, electric knives, espresso machines, food choppers, food processors, food steamers, ice cream makers, and indoor grills.
Kitchen appliances represented 18.0%, 18.2% and 9.9% of our net sales in fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

During 2001, a number of changes occurred in the kitchen appliance business, which convinced us that the
market for many of our kitchen products had changed and that such changes would cease to reward our innovation and development efforts with respect to these products. Accordingly, we decided to concentrate our efforts on manufacturing a smaller
number of kitchen appliance products, where innovation is still important, and gradually cease manufacturing other kitchen appliance products. In the past three fiscal years, our most significant reduction in manufacturing has been in coffeemakers,
breadmakers and food steamers. The total sales of these products decreased from $24.0 million in fiscal 2003 to $5.4 million in fiscal 2006. In addition, the bankruptcies of two of our former major customers, Sunbeam Corporation and Moulinex S.A.,
coupled with the consolidation in the industry and continued demand by mass merchandisers for lower-priced appliance products have led us to accelerate our diversification strategy and cease development efforts of most kitchen appliance products.

Electronic components.We started manufacturing CCMs early in fiscal 2006 utilizing CMOS sensors in two sizes, 0.3
and 1.3 megapixels. We also introduced the Intellicorder home security device utilizing our CCM technology. We expect to expand our CCM business by incorporating an automatic focus feature, as well as introducing and offering a 2.0
megapixel model. Additionally, we plan to introduce other home electronics products incorporating optics.

Product Design and Development

Our core business has been designing, manufacturing and selling a wide range of small electrical household appliances for brand
marketers in developed countries. We are, however, continuing to acquire new technologies in an effort to expand our capabilities in manufacturing finished products. It is our long-term strategy to gradually diversify and transform a portion of our
manufacturing facility located in Dongguan in PRC to produce higher-value, technology-oriented products that will allow us to leverage our existing development and technical management staff in Hong Kong. We have recently redefined our development
programs and reduced the technical staff to streamline and refocus our efforts.

Small Household Appliances Business

We recently determined that our design and development efforts would be limited to supporting our existing customers programs. As the
business became more and more commoditized, we could no longer justify the investment needed to support any further independent design or product development efforts and therefore reduced our overall staff.

The remaining customer technical support team includes mechanical, electrical and electronic engineers to perform detailed engineering and testing of our
products. The team supports the products from customer input and design through tooling, manufacturing and life testing. The typical cycle for contract manufacturing is eight to ten months after the concept and design for the product are provided by
the customer. Contract manufacturing customers generally bear the cost of tooling for their products but our engineers design and build or procure the necessary tools and debug them during the pilot manufacturing process. When tooling is completed
and the appropriate agency listing, such as UL or TUV is obtained, production begins.

Our expenditures for design and development of small
household appliance products were approximately $1.3 million in fiscal 2004, $1.1 million in fiscal 2005 and $1.3 million in fiscal 2006, but are expected to decline significantly going forward.

Display-Oriented Products Business

We established our subsidiary, Global Display, to develop and market a wide range of LCD products. Initially, the primary product development function was to design flat-panel high definition HDTVs incorporating plasma or TFT-LCDs. Since
the display modules are readily procured from fab plants (the capital intensive processing facilities that convert glass, gases and transistors into display modules), we concentrated our efforts on cosmetic design, framing systems and
software development. We believed the key to success was developing our own video control board designs in order to satisfy different OEM and ODM client requirements, as well as incorporating differentiated audio and video systems in order to
enhance performance.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

Due to the dramatic drop in flat-panel LCD television pricing and our late entry into this market, we
decided to downsize our display engineering team and transferred a small team of software and optical engineers to our new electronic components team to focus on developing applications and finished products incorporating CCMs.

This group will consist of a few development engineers supported by a large number of PRC based process, electronic and clean room engineers.

Our expenditures for design and development for Global Display and Global Optics were $0.7 million, $1.2 million and $0.3 million in fiscal 2004, 2005
and 2006 respectively. A significant portion of these expenditures were incurred for sample design fees and salaries for our engineers.

Lite Arrays OLED Business

The Companys subsidiary Lite Array continued its development of manufacturing
processes and product designs for OLEDs throughout fiscal 2006. A vacuum deposition system has been set up in a clean room in our factory in Dongguan, China and the prototyping line, including the photolithography equipment we acquired from Opsys US
Corporation (Opsys), was installed. The line has the capacity to produce prototypes for customer product evaluation. We recently entered into an agreement with Anwell Technologies Limited, a Singapore public company, to pool our efforts
and resources in developing OLED equipment. We allocated all of our equipment, non-licensed know-how and personnel to the venture in which we have a 30% ownership and both parties decided to operate the venture in our Dongguan facility.

Our expenditure for design and development for OLED, excluding license amortization, was approximately $300,000, $150,000 and $99,000 in fiscal 2004,
2005 and 2006 respectively, the majority of which was for salaries and wages of our technical staff and engineers.

Manufacturing

We maintain our principal production facility in the township of Dongguan, Guangdong Province, China, within a self-contained 220,998 square meters
vertically-integrated manufacturing complex. Vertical integration enables us to manufacture high-quality products at a low cost. It also allows us to emphasize quality control and provide the flexibility in the manufacturing process necessary to
better service our customers needs. We have made a significant investment in machinery to create the tooling and components used in the manufacturing process for many of our products. This machinery, along with the use of relatively
inexpensive labor, enables us to produce efficiently many of our components and assemble these components to create our finished products. We manufacture most of our motors and other components, including thermostats, plastic, metal and die-cast
parts, switches and circuit boards. We also have a multi-faceted coatings line and pad printing capability. We subcontract the production of certain components either when they can be bought from other suppliers at lower prices or if we do not have
the specialized machinery to produce the component or when we can allocate our production capacity more efficiently to alternative tasks. For our core business, we do not generally depend on other manufacturers to provide key parts or accessories.

Generally, our production schedule is based on purchase orders and forecasts received from our customers once tooling is completed,
typically covering a period of three to six months. The first 45 days of orders to be shipped pursuant to the forecasts are generally firm. Later shipments often vary from initial forecasts, depending on the needs of the customer. The relation of
actual shipments to forecasted orders is based on industry custom rather than on binding agreements, and thus forecasted orders may be canceled at any time without penalty to the customer or recourse to us. To the extent that a material percentage
of forecasted orders from customers are canceled, we could suffer a loss on long-lead item components.

Our physical space is less than
fully utilized and we have excess capacity available to meet any temporary surge in our requirements and also for future development. Excluding dormitories, cafeterias and recreation areas, roads and portions of land reserved for future expansion,
the completed production area is approximately 176,000 square meters. Currently we are utilizing approximately 80% of our manufacturing facilitys production capacity; however, many of our larger injection molding machines and our electric
motor line are operating at capacity. Specialized skills are generally not required for most of our manufacturing workforce and we believe that we will be able to acquire the necessary labor when product demand increases. However, due to demand for
labor in Guangdong Province exceeding supply, we expect the cost of labor to increase substantially. We therefore plan to invest in more automation to help hold down our cost of production.

We ship our products primarily free on board (FOB) from ports in Hong Kong and China, with customers generally liable for any losses resulting from the
transportation of finished products from the port to their final destination. Title to the goods passes to



15



---

##### Table of Contents

the customer when the truck is unloaded and the container is accepted by the carrier located in the ports of Hong Kong or China. Transportation of components
and finished products between Dongguan, China and port is by truck. Component parts purchased from areas outside Guangdong Province are generally shipped by sea.

Our subsidiary Lite Array, formerly operated a joint venture in Jiangmen, China to produce 1/4 VGA or smaller monochrome TFEL displays. In fiscal 2003, we sold the TFEL display business to the former management of
Lite Array including the interest in the joint venture in Jiangmen, China.

We have established an OLED prototype facility in our Dongguan
manufacturing complex and plan to make use of the existing administrative, engineering and logistical support, as well as our venture with Anwell, to help minimize our costs.

On January 7, 2003, we entered into an asset purchase and lease agreement with Opsys (the Purchase Agreement) pursuant to which we
purchased their research and development experimental production equipment for small molecule OLED displays for $1.0 million. Concurrent with the purchase of the equipment, we leased it back to Opsys through February 28, 2003 for a rental
payment of $1,000 per month. Upon the execution of the Purchase Agreement, we were granted a warrant to purchase securities of Opsys (and of any of its affiliates that raised capital) having an aggregate valuation of $2.0 million, with such warrants
having an exercise price of $0.0001 per share. At the time of the execution of the Purchase Agreement, we believed that the purchase of the equipment and the opportunity to acquire such securities would accelerate our progress in OLED product
development. An involuntary proceeding under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code was commenced against Opsys on May 3, 2003. On September 4, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California issued an order to
allow us to proceed with removal of the equipment located in Opsys business location. We have removed and shipped the equipment to our facility in Dongguan, China and we have completed re-installing it in a new clean room. We have now formed a
joint venture company with Anwell using this as a research and development line to exploit synergies related to the production of OLED systems.

Quality
Control

We are committed to manufacturing products of the highest quality and we achieve this goal by engaging in quality control
testing at each stage of the manufacturing process. All incoming raw materials and components are inspected by our quality control personnel. During the production stage, our quality control personnel inspect all work-in-process at several points in
the production process. We are able to test the reliability and consistent performance of our products by testing both individual components and the fully-assembled finished product. We provide access to our manufacturing facility for
representatives of our major customers to allow them to monitor production and to provide them with direct access to our manufacturing personnel.

Our quality control system has been certified by Det Norske Veritas QA Ltd., an accredited unit of the ISO, as conforming to Quality System Standard ISO 9001 for the manufacture of electrical household appliances. Our receipt of ISO 9001
certification demonstrates that our manufacturing, installation and servicing of products have met specified requirements.

Suppliers

We obtain over 3,400 different component parts from approximately 400 major suppliers. We are not dependent upon any single supplier for any key component
except for CMOS sensors used in our CCMs, but we are currently evaluating a second source for these sensors. Certain of our major component parts, such as plastic, metal sheets and packaging, are purchased solely from outside suppliers. Others, such
as motors and electrical and electronic parts, are either manufactured by us or purchased from outside suppliers, depending on the complexity of the component and the capacity of our facilities at the time. We believe that we can obtain all of these
components from alternate sources if necessary. Raw materials, electronic components and other parts are either sourced in China or from other countries, primarily the United States, Japan and Germany. Raw materials from outside China are generally
shipped through Hong Kong and then transported by truck to our factory in China. Transactions with our suppliers are based on purchase orders issued by us from time to time and we have no other written agreements with our suppliers. Orders for
components are based on actual orders and forecasts that we receive from our customers that reflect anticipated shipments during the production cycle for a particular model. Many of the raw materials used in our products including plastics that are
purchased outside China are subject to any applicable duties.

Since we are dependent upon outside suppliers for all of our raw material
needs, including plastic resins, the results of our operations are subject to price fluctuations in these raw materials. The plastic resins used by us are derived from natural gas liquids.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Plastic resin prices may fluctuate as a result of changes in natural gas and crude oil prices, and the relative capacity, supply and demand for resin and
petrochemical intermediates from which the resins are produced. We have no long-term supply contracts for the purchase of plastic resin, although we do generally maintain a 90-day supply. In recent months plastic pricing has been very volatile and
current prices are 25% higher than a year ago. We work closely with our customers and suppliers in order to minimize the amount of inventory of raw materials we keep on hand and we are working on improving our automated inventory maintenance and
control system to assist us in doing this. In order to expedite the production process and reduce the risk of delays caused by the non-delivery of supplies, it is our general policy to source each component from two or more suppliers. This
multi-source approach is intended to ensure the delivery of the components necessary in the manufacturing process should one supplier be unable to deliver. Historically, we have not experienced any difficulty in obtaining component parts.

Major Customers

Major customers in
2002 and 2003 included Morphy Richards Limited, Global Marketing Corporation (whose customer sold under the brand name Gevalia) and Black & Decker. As we started to de-emphasize kitchen appliances, sales to these three customers declined to
5% in 2004 from 31% and 27% of consolidated net sales in 2002 and 2003 respectively.

Sales to Royal Appliance Manufacturing Company (which
sells under the brand name Dirt Devil) amounted to 42.5%, 44.3%, 48.4%, 62.7% and 40.4% of net sales in the five fiscal years ended March 31, 2006. Sales to our other major floor care customer Electrolux/Eureka started in 2003 and represented
5.6%, 26.1%, 10.3% and 34.1% in the four fiscal years ended March 31, 2006. Decreased sales to Electrolux in fiscal 2005 was due to their holding excess inventory of an older discontinued model on hand and their finalization of the engineering
specifications for a new floor care model which we began shipping in late fiscal 2005. However sales to Electrolux recovered to $25.1 million in fiscal 2006 as the new floor care model was successfully introduced. Sales of floor care products to our
major customer, Royal decreased in dollars from $32.4 million or 48.4% of net sales in fiscal 2004 to $26.2 million or 62.7% of net sales in fiscal 2005 but increased to $29.9 million in 2006. On December 17, 2002, TTI and Royal jointly
announced that they had entered into a definitive agreement for TTI to acquire Royal. Effective April 23, 2003, TTI announced its acquisition of Royal by way of merger. Following the completion of the merger, Royal has operated as a wholly
owned subsidiary of TTI. TTI, like the Company, is a full-line electrical products manufacturer based in Hong Kong and China and eventually is likely to produce all Royal products. We have not received any formal or informal notice from Royal and we
cannot predict when TTI will begin producing all of Royal products and stop buying from us, but believe such a result is likely to occur within the reasonably near future. Net sales are expected to decline unless we are able to replace Royal with
another major floor care company as a customer in the near future.

Although the relative percentage of sales to each of our major
customers changes each year, we expect that in the foreseeable future we will be dependent on between two and four major customers during each fiscal year. While we may enter into contracts with general terms for the purchase of products with
certain of our major customers, sales are generally made by purchase orders received by us from time to time without any firm commitment for sales levels over a long-term period.

Marketing

Our marketing for our core small appliance business has been relegated to a basic customer
service function concentrating on schedule coordination, logistics and responding to customer requests.

One of the most important areas of
the marketing process is communication with the customer. The marketing group maintains contact with the customer after the sale is made, serving as their liaison during the manufacturing and delivery process. These relationships and methods have
been cultivated over years and we believe that we have a stable relationship with our major customers. Many of our customers, including most of our major customers, have purchased goods from us for many years. Long-standing relationships,
innovation, quality and our reputation in the industry remain the essential elements of our customer support program.

For the electronic
component and home electronic products, marketing is designed to give exposure to our innovative, high-quality and cost-effective product capabilities. Generally, we emphasize personal contact with our customers and potential customers in our
facilities and frequently at their headquarters. While our customers rely on us for high-quality products, the ultimate consumers of the products rely on the customers brand name and generally do not know the identity of the manufacturer. The
primary concern of our customers in maintaining a relationship with us is buying better products at lower prices. We believe that innovation is the key for both our customers and us in this regard.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

Our CCM business is currently a commodity business with price and production capacity being the only
criteria in securing sales. However, if our development program is successful and results in technical advances, we will be able to market our product to top tier consumer electronic brands and improve our profit margins.

Competition

We believe that the markets for our core
products are mature and highly competitive and that competition is based upon several factors, primarily price, but also product features and enhancements and new product introductions. We compete with established companies in Hong Kong and China, a
number of which have substantially greater technical, financial and marketing resources than us. Competition for contract manufacturing products is based primarily on unit price, product quality and availability and service. Except for opening price
point products, we believe that we compete favorably in each of these areas, especially if the product is relatively sophisticated to manufacture. In addition, while individual contract manufacturing customers may have preferences among their
approved suppliers, management believes that no company dominates the market as contract manufacturing customers tend to order from several different suppliers in order to lessen dependence on any one entity.

Competition in the CCM market is intense as productive capacity comes on line from many companies. However, since the market for cellular phone cameras
is also expanding at over 40% per annum, we believe we can sell as much as we can produce but not necessarily at attractive or even adequate margins.

Intellectual Property Rights

We currently hold 84 patents, of which ten were approved in fiscal 2006. Our patents are
registered in various jurisdictions, including the United States, the United Kingdom, China and France. We hold the exclusive rights with respect to certain technology included in our products. We rely primarily upon a combination of trademark,
copyright, know-how, trade secrets and contractual restrictions to protect our intellectual property rights. We believe that such measures afford only limited protection and, accordingly, there can be no assurance that the steps taken by us to
protect these proprietary rights will be adequate to prevent misappropriation of the technology or the independent development of similar technology by others. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt
to copy aspects of our products or obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary.

Significant and protracted litigation may be
necessary to protect our intellectual property rights, to determine the scope of the proprietary rights of others or to defend against claims of infringement. We believe that our systems do not infringe any existing third-party proprietary rights.
There can be no assurance, however, that third-party claims alleging infringement will not be asserted against us in the future. If infringement is alleged, we could be required to



| |  |  | discontinue the use of certain software codes or processes,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | incur significant litigation damages, costs and expenses, and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | develop non-infringing technology or obtain licenses to the alleged infringing technology.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There can be no assurance that we would be able to develop any such alternative technologies or obtain any such licenses on terms commercially acceptable
to us. Any infringement claim or other litigation against us could have a material adverse affect on our business, operating results and financial condition. See Note 23  Contingent liabilities to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Certain agreements with our ODM customers include indemnification provisions against patent infringement claims relating to such products.
Along with a customer, we are currently defending a patent infringement claim relating to one of our deep fryer models, a product line that represented 2.0%, 0.5%, 0.3%, 6.2%, 1.2% and 0.0 % of our net sales in fiscal 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
and 2006, respectively. See Item 8.AFinancial InformationLegal Proceedings. No assurance can be given that this infringement claim will be resolved in our favor or the customers or that other parties will not assert
infringement claims against us in the future.

At the time of Lite Arrays acquisition, we also acquired a license for small molecule
passive matrix (PM) OLED display technology. Under the license, we could use the patents and proprietary technology in our manufacturing and marketing of OLED products and it gave us the right to purchase from the licensor certain
patented materials for use in the manufacture of OLED products. However, the licensor did not secure its intellectual property in China which put us at a severe competitive disadvantage with other PRC-based producers. Since the minimum royalty was
onerous and our competitors could sell royalty free, we decided to discontinue the use of the licensed technology.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

Foreign Issuer Considerations

Because we are a foreign issuer incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and we conduct our operations and own assets primarily in China and Hong Kong,
our operations and assets are subject to significant political, economic, legal and other uncertainties in China, Hong Kong and, in some instances, the British Virgin Islands. These uncertainties include the following.

Conditions in China. China is a socialist state which, since 1949, has been controlled by the Communist Party of China. Changes in the top
political leadership of the Chinese government may have a significant impact on policy and the political and economic environment in China. Moreover, economic reforms and growth in China have been more successful in certain provinces than in others
and the continuation or increase of such disparities could affect political or social stability. In December 2001, China was admitted to the World Trade Organization after 15 years of negotiations and was granted the full trading rights of a WTO
member country, but is still considered to be a high risk nation for business and investment in the Asian region. Although recently China has permitted greater provincial and local economic autonomy and private economic activities, the government of
China has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over virtually every section of the Chinese economy through regulation and state ownership. Accordingly, government actions in the future, including any decision not to continue to
support the economic reform program that commenced in the late 1970s and possibly to return to the more centrally-planned economy that existed prior thereto, could have a significant effect on economic conditions in China and on our
operations. Also, the legal system of China relating to foreign investments is both new and continually evolving, and there can be no certainty as to the application of its laws and regulations in particular instances.

On June 29, 2003, China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) entered the Closer Economic Partnership Agreement
(CEPA), which was implemented on January 1, 2004. Under CEPA, Hong Kong companies can benefit from liberalized measures beyond the scope of Chinas commitments in its WTO accession treaty. The arrangement covers three areas:
trade in goods; trade in services and trade and investment facilitation. Under CEPA, 90% of Hong Kong domestic exports to China can enjoy zero tariffs. CEPA also opens 18 service sectors to Hong Kong companies. In this respect, China has given Hong
Kong an advantage under CEPA in that Hong Kong companies can enjoy more benefits under CEPA compared with the provisions of the WTO. The Arrangement presently has limited direct positive impact on us since most of our products are shipped to
overseas customers but it could possibly benefit our electronic components business in the future.

All of our products are currently
manufactured in China and over 90% of the net book value of our total fixed assets is located in China. We are a party to agreements with certain agencies of the government of China and we sell products to entities based principally in the United
States and Europe. International operations and sales may be subject to political and economic risks, including political instability, currency controls and exchange rate fluctuations, and changes in import/export regulations, tariff and freight
rates. In addition, various forms of protectionist trade legislation have been proposed on occasion in the United States and certain European countries. Changes in tariff structures or other trade policies could adversely affect us.

Our location in Southern China offers us low overhead and competitive (although higher than the Northern provinces in China) labor rates. The location of
our factory in the township of Dongguan, Guangdong Province provides us with the ability to manage factory operations from Hong Kong and facilitates transportation of our products to markets outside China.

Any recurrence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) or incidence of Avian Influenza in China could negatively impact our manufacturing
plant located in Dongguan, China. If our Hong Kong based supervisory staff is unable to travel or if other labor problems arise, it could seriously disrupt our manufacturing operation and cause significant delays in production. In addition, if the
outbreak of Avian Influenza in Asian countries, including China, Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam were to spread to Hong Kong and China, where our executive office and operation facilities are located, it may disrupt our business.

Chinese government regulation. Our operations and assets in China are subject to significant political, economic, legal and
other uncertainties. Changes in policies by the Chinese or local governments resulting in



| |  |  | changes in laws and regulations, or the interpretation and enforcement of existing laws and regulations,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | confiscatory or increased taxation,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | restrictions on currency conversion, imports and sources of supply,
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



19



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | import duties,
| | - |  | --------------



| |  |  | currency revaluation, or
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | the expropriation of private enterprise
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------

could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Under its current leadership, the Chinese government has been pursuing economic reform policies, including the encouragement of private economic activity and greater economic
decentralization. There can be no assurance, however, that the Chinese government will continue to pursue such policies, that such policies will be successful if pursued or that such policies will not be significantly altered from time to time
without notice. There also can be no assurance that business operations in China would not become subject to the risk of nationalization, which could result in the total loss of investment in that country. Following the Chinese governments
program of privatizing many state-owned enterprises, the government has attempted to augment its revenues through increased tax collection. Continued efforts to increase tax revenues could result in increased taxation expense being incurred by us.
Economic development may be limited as well by



| |  |  | the imposition of austerity measures intended to reduce inflation, increase taxes or reform unprofitable state owned enterprises,
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the inadequate development of infrastructure, and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the potential unavailability of adequate power and water supplies, transportation, communications and raw materials and parts.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Chinese government regulates the import into China of certain raw materials used by us in our manufacturing process and taxes the importation of
certain capital equipment. The approval of imports by the government is based to some extent on the lack of qualified domestically-produced products and strategic plans for the development of local Chinese industry. There can be no assurance that
the governments policies will continue to allow the raw materials we require to be imported into China. There also can be no assurance that the governments policies will not impose import fees which raise the cost of raw materials or
capital equipment. Imposing such fees could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Chinese legal system. Chinas legal system is a civil law system that is based on written statutes and in which decided legal cases have little precedential value. China does not have a well-developed, consolidated body
of laws governing foreign investment enterprises. As a result, the administration of laws and regulations by government agencies may be subject to considerable discretion. As legal systems in China develop, foreign business entities may be adversely
affected by new laws, changes to existing laws or interpretations of existing laws and preemption of provincial or local laws by national laws. In circumstances where adequate laws exist, it may not be possible to obtain swift and equitable
enforcement of the laws.

Chinese environmental law. Environmental protection in China is regulated in accordance with the
Environmental Protection Law of the Peoples Republic of China, which became effective on December 26, 1989. The law sets national standards for environmental quality and monitoring, as well as the utilization of natural resources and the
reduction of pollution. As a manufacturer, we are subject to annual inspections by the local branch of the SEPA. We have passed our most recent inspection and believe that we are in material compliance with all applicable environmental laws. There
can be no assurance, however, that we will continue to pass future inspections or that we will continue to be in material compliance with all applicable environmental laws in the future. Environmental regulation is evolving in China and the
imposition of additional or more stringent environmental laws by China, or more stringent enforcement of existing laws, could cause us to have to make substantial additional capital expenditures to maintain compliance in the future. The necessity to
make such additional capital expenditures could have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations and financial condition.

Conditions in Hong Kong. Hong Kong, the jurisdiction of incorporation of eight of our subsidiaries and the location of our headquarters, was restored to China on July 1, 1997. We conduct sales, marketing, product design
and development, administration and other activities in Hong Kong. Accordingly, we may be materially adversely affected by factors affecting Hong Kongs political situation and its economy or its international political and economic relations.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

As of July 1, 1997, Hong Kong became a Special Administrative Region, or SAR, of China, with certain
autonomy from the Chinese government, including being a separate customs territory from China with separate tariff rates and export control procedures and maintaining a separate intellectual property registration system. All land leases in effect at
the time of the transfer of sovereignty were extended for a period of 50 years, except for those leases without a renewal option expiring after June 30, 1997 and before June 30, 2047. Hong Kong continues to be a member of the WTO and the
Hong Kong dollar continues to be legal tender, freely convertible into Renminbi, and not subject to foreign exchange controls. The Hong Kong SAR government, as set up by China, has sole responsibility for tax policies. Notwithstanding the provisions
of these international agreements, there can be no assurance as to the continued stability of political, economic or commercial conditions in Hong Kong.

No treaty exists between Hong Kong and the United States providing for the reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. Accordingly, Hong Kong courts might not enforce judgments predicated on the federal securities
laws of the United States, whether arising from actions brought in the United States or, if permitted, in Hong Kong.

Conditions in
Macau. Macau, the jurisdiction of incorporation of one of our subsidiaries, was restored to China on December 19, 1999. We established an office in Macau on November 8, 2001. We conduct sales, marketing, administration and other
activities in Macau.

Macau was founded by the Portuguese in 1557. It lies approximately 40 miles west of Hong Kong and has a population of
approximately of 500,000. Portugal signed the Sino-Portuguese Joint Declaration with China on April 13, 1987 providing the return to Chinese administration. In the Sino-Portuguese Joint Declaration, China has promised to respect Macaus
existing social and economic systems and lifestyle for 50 years. Similar to Hong Kong, Macau has been set up as a SAR with its own legal and economic systems. Notwithstanding the provision of these international agreements, there can be no assurance
as to the continual stability of political, economic or commercial condition in Macau. No treaty exists between Macau and the United States providing for the reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. However, the courts of Macau are generally
prepared to accept a foreign judgment as evidence of a debt due.



|C. | Organizational structure.
|-- | -------------------------

The
following table sets forth the significant subsidiaries owned, directly or indirectly, by us to date.

SUBSIDIARIES:

|                                                                                           |  |                                                                |  |                        |  |                                    |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | -
|Name                                                                                       |  | Principal activities                                           |  | Place of incorporation |  | Percentage of equity interest held |  
|Global Appliances Holdings Limited                                                         |  | Investment holding                                             |  | British Virgin Islands |  | 100.0                              | %
|Global Display Holdings Limited                                                            |  | Investment holding                                             |  | British Virgin Islands |  | 100.0                              |  
|Lite Array Holdings Limited                                                                |  | Investment holding                                             |  | British Virgin Islands |  | 100.0                              |  
|Dongguan Wing Shing Electrical Products Factory Company Limited                            |  | Manufacturing                                                  |  | China                  |  | 100.0                              |  
|Dongguan Lite Array Company Limited                                                        |  | Manufacturing                                                  |  | China                  |  | 100.0                              |  
|Dongguan Litewell (OLED) Technology Co., Ltd.                                              |  | Manufacturing                                                  |  | China                  |  | 100.0                              |  
|Global Digital Imaging Limited (Formerly known as Global
Display Limited)                  |  | Trading                                                        |  | Hong Kong              |  | 100.0                              |  
|Global-Tech USA, Inc.                                                                      |  | Investor relations and consulting                              |  | United States          |  | 100.0                              |  
|MasterWerke Limited                                                                        |  | Investment holding                                             |  | United States          |  | 100.0                              |  
|GT Investments (BVI) Limited                                                               |  | Investment holding                                             |  | British Virgin Islands |  | 100.0                              |  
|Kwong Lee Shun Trading Company Limited                                                     |  | Provision of management services                               |  | Hong Kong              |  | 100.0                              |  
|Pentalpha Enterprises Limited                                                              |  | Dormant                                                        |  | Hong Kong              |  | 100.0                              |  
|Pentalpha Hong Kong Limited                                                                |  | Trading                                                        |  | Hong Kong              |  | 100.0                              |  
|Pentalpha Macau Commercial Offshore Limited                                                |  | Trading                                                        |  | Macau                  |  | 100.0                              |  
|Wing Shing Overseas Limited                                                                |  | Trading                                                        |  | British Virgin Islands |  | 100.0                              |  
|Wing Shing Products (BVI) Company Limited                                                  |  | Dormant                                                        |  | British Virgin Islands |  | 100.0                              |  
|Global Auto Limited (Formerly known as Lite Array (OLED)
H.K. Limited)                     |  | Marketing and trading of automobile audio devices              |  | Hong Kong              |  | 70.0                               |  
|Global Optics Limited                                                                      |  | Trading of raw materials and electronic and optical components |  | Hong Kong              |  | 100.0                              |  
|Winway Technology Development Limited                                                      |  | Marketing and trading                                          |  | Hong Kong              |  | 83.33                              |  
|Consortium Investment (BVI) Limited                                                        |  | Asset and investment holding                                   |  | British Virgin Islands |  | 100.0                              |  
|Global Rich Innovation Limited                                                             |  | Trading                                                        |  | Hong Kong              |  | 100.0                              |  
|Lite Array, Inc.                                                                           |  | Trading                                                        |  | United States          |  | 76.75                              |  
|Global Lite Array (BVI) Limited                                                            |  | Investment holding                                             |  | British Virgin Islands |  | 76.75                              |  
|Lite Array OLED (BVI) Company Limited (Formerly
known as Lite Array (BVI) Company Limited) |  | Procuring and selling                                          |  | British Virgin Islands |  | 76.75                              |  



21



---

##### Table of Contents

Global-Tech is a holding company, which does not engage in daily business operations other than owning
subsidiaries that design, manufacture and market a wide range of consumer electrical products worldwide, including (but not limited to) floor care products and small electrical appliances.

Global Appliances Holdings Limited is an intermediate holding company of GT Investments (BVI) Limited. GT Investments (BVI) Limited is the intermediate
holding company of Wing Shing Overseas Limited, Pentalpha Hong Kong Limited, Pentalpha Enterprises Limited, Global Rich Innovation Limited and Winway Technology Development Limited.

Consortium Investment (BVI) Limited (CIBL) is an immediate holding company of Lite Array Holdings Limited and Kwong Lee Shun Trading Company
Limited. On March 17, 2006, CIBL entered into an agreement with Anwell Technologies Limited (Anwell), a publicly listed company in Singapore, to form a joint venture company which Anwell invested in by purchasing a 70% interest in
Lite Array Holdings Limited.

Global Display Holdings Limited is an immediate holding company of Global Optics Limited, Global Display
Limited (name changed to Global Digital Imaging Limited on July 21, 2006), and Lite Array (OLED) H.K. Limited (name changed to Global Auto Limited on June 6, 2006). On August 1, 2006, Global Display Holdings Limited transferred its
shareholding in Global Auto Limited to Global Appliances Holdings Limited. On the same day, 30% of the shareholdings of Global Auto Limited were registered to an independent third party upon its contribution of capital to the company.

Lite Array Holdings Limited is an immediate holding company of Dongguan Litewell (OLED) Technology Co., Ltd and Litewell Technology (HK) Limited.
Litewell Technology (HK) Limited was incorporated on June 19, 2006.

Global Lite Array (BVI) Limited is an immediate holding company
of Lite Array OLED (BVI) Company Limited and Lite Array, Inc.

Global-Tech USA, Inc. is an immediate holding company of MasterWerke Ltd.



|D. | Property, plant and equipment.
|-- | ------------------------------

China

Our manufacturing facility located in Dongguan, China has a land use area of 224,798 square meters. We have the right to use such land,
which we acquired from the Dongguan local government. Prior to March 31, 2006, we had obtained only four agreements for the purchase of land aggregating 179,590 square meters but subsequently obtained the formal agreement for the remaining
45,208 square meters from the local authority. As part of the agreement, we have transferred a portion of this land (13,698 square meters), which was previously used as a recreational area to the Dongguan local government. Additionally, the
acquisition of rights to use the remaining portion of land (31,510 square meters), on which we had already built dormitories for workers, was confirmed and such rights will expire on August 6, 2043.

The manufacturing complex includes 49 buildings, of which 16 buildings are dormitories with accommodation for up to 4,500 employees and cafeterias and
recreational areas. The remaining buildings house manufacturing, quality control, warehousing, product



22



---

##### Table of Contents

development and administrative functions. We own all of the 49 buildings on the site and have freely transferable land use rights for a period of 50 years
for the land upon which our buildings and facilities are located. Excluding dormitories, cafeterias and recreation areas, roads and a portion of land reserved for future expansion, our completed production area is approximately 145,000 square
meters. The land use rights lease for the Dongguan facility between us and the Peoples Government of Qingxi Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province is for a term of 50 years ending August 7, 2043. In fiscal 2004 and 2005, we paid
approximately $291,000 for the outstanding land transfer fees for the formal grant of the lease rights.

During fiscal 2006, the land use
right certificate for a substantial portion of land with an aggregate area of 131,400 square meters was obtained and the related property ownership certificate of our production premises is being processed by the government agencies in China. For
the remaining portion of the land of 44,208 square meters, we have obtained the purchase agreement, are applying for the land use right certificate and have paid certificate fees of $0.3 million to the Dongguan Local Land Registration Office.

The formal grant of lease rights is required should we decide to sell this property or lease it to a third party. Although we have no
present intention to pursue either of these alternatives, the local government still has the right to demand additional transfer fees before the issuance of the land use right certificate. Therefore, we decided to consummate the land transfer
process by the end of 2006. Upon expiration of the 50-year lease term of the land, we have the right to extend the lease for a further 20 years upon payment of a fee of $23.00 per square meter, or a total of $4.9 million, for the whole land use
right extension. Currently we have set up assembly and testing equipment for CCMs in an approximately 1,700 square meters clean room and also built a clean room for Lite Array. Lite Array has completed the installation of its research and
development equipment in its clean room which is now being used by the Anwell joint venture.

We maintain an office in Shenzhen for a small
marketing team focused on the China market and on July 7, 2005, we entered into a 12-month lease for our office space there. The total office space was approximately 156 square meters and annual rent for this space was approximately $27,400.
The lease was terminated on July 7, 2006 and no compensation was needed for early termination. We moved to a larger office space of approximately 330 square meters to accommodate our CCM sales and accounting staff with our lease effective from
May 1, 2006. The annual rent for this space is approximately $42,000.

Hong Kong

On December 1, 2004, we entered into an amendment of a lease agreement with our affiliate Wing Shing Products Company Limited (see Item 7.B,
Related Party Transactions), for office space located in the Kin Teck Industrial Building in Aberdeen, Hong Kong. The lease expired on March 31, 2006 and was renewed on May 15, 2006 but is effective from April 1, 2006 for 24
months. The leased area of the current lease covers approximately 14,680 square feet, a reduction from the 25,690 square feet previously leased for our executive offices and limited warehousing space. Pursuant to the existing lease, we pay annual
rent of approximately $102,000 for this space.

On June 15, 2003, we entered into a 24-month lease for office space located on the
12thfloor, Kin Teck Industrial Building, Aberdeen, from Wing Shing Products Company Limited effective from
April 1, 2003. The total space rented was approximately 7,400 square feet. We leased this office for the product development group of our display business. During fiscal 2006, we relocated our administrative, purchasing, accounting and finance
staff back to this space. Annual rent for this space is approximately $51,000. The lease has been renewed for a further twenty-four month period from Wing Shing Products Company Limited at an annual rent of approximately $51,000.

Effective April 1, 2004, we entered into a 12-month lease for office space located on the 13thfloor, Kin Teck Industrial Building, Aberdeen, from Wing Shing Products Company Limited. The total space is approximately 3,670 square feet. We leased this
office for the product development group for our core business. Annual rent for this space is approximately $20,000. Due to the downsizing of the Companys workforce, we have consolidated all our functions in the 12thfloor, Kin Teck Industrial Building.

On July 29, 2002, we entered into a 77-month lease with Goman Limited for office space located on 21st floor, Citicorp Centre, 18 Whitfield Road, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong. The total office space was
approximately 13,961 square feet at an annual rent of approximately $248,000. We relocated our administrative offices back to the 12thfloor, Kin Teck Industrial Building effective January 2006 and the lease was terminated on March 31, 2006. We have paid approximately $72,000 to the new tenant of 21st floor, Citicorp Centre as a fit-out subsidy and we
did not incur any other early termination penalty.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

On January 21, 2005, our subsidiary, Winway, entered into a 36-month lease with Rikon Limited for
office space in Office 1, 28th floor, Citicorp Centre, 18 Whitfield Road, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong. The total office space is approximately 4,819 square feet at an annual rent of approximately $67,000.

All related party leases are at market rates.

Macau

On October 15, 2001, we entered into a 24-month lease for office space on the 15th floor of the Macau Finance Centre, Rua de
Pequim 244/246, Macau. The lease expired on October 2003 and was renewable on an annual basis. The current lease will expire on January 14, 2007. The total office space is approximately 1,400 square feet and is occupied by the sales and
accounting staff of Pentalpha Macau Commercial Offshore Limited. Annual rent for this space is approximately $20,100.

We believe that our
administrative office space in Hong Kong, China and Macau will be adequate for the operation of our business for the foreseeable future. We believe that with further utilization of our manufacturing facility in Dongguan, we have sufficient
manufacturing capacity for at least the next several years. The factory is currently utilized at considerably less than full capacity. We anticipate that any further expansion and diversification of our floor care product line or expansion of our
CCM business could increase utilization at the Dongguan facility and require us to expand the infrastructure and purchase additional equipment.



|Item | 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments.
|---- | ------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item | 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------

Except for
statements of historical facts, this section contains forward-looking statements such as expect. anticipate, project, believe, plan, intend, seek,
should, estimate, future, or variations of such words and other similar expressions to identify forward looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are not a guarantee of our future performance or results and our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under the
sections of this Report titled Item 3D  Risk factors and Item 4B  Business overview. This section should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.



|A. | Operating results.
|-- | ------------------



|                                             |  |                             |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | - |  | ----- | - |  | ----- | -
|                                             |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, |  
|                                             |  | 2004                        |   |  | 2005  |   |  | 2006  |  
|Net sales                                    |  | 100.0                       | % |  | 100.0 | % |  | 100.0 | %
|Cost of goods sold                           |  | 79.1                        |   |  | 106.6 |   |  | 94.6  |  
|                                             |  |                             |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Gross profit (loss)                          |  | 20.9                        |   |  | (6.6  | ) |  | 5.4   |  
|Selling, general and administrative expenses |  | (28.4                       | ) |  | (38.4 | ) |  | (24.4 | )
|Other operating income (loss)                |  |                            |   |  | (1.9  | ) |  | 3.2   |  
|                                             |  |                             |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Operating loss                               |  | (7.5                        | ) |  | (46.9 | ) |  | (15.8 | )
|Interest expense                             |  | 0.0                         |   |  | 0.0   |   |  | 0.0   |  
|Interest income                              |  | 1.3                         |   |  | 2.3   |   |  | 1.7   |  
|Other income (expenses), net                 |  | 0.6                         |   |  | 0.1   |   |  | (1.1  | )
|                                             |  |                             |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Loss from operations before income taxes     |  | (5.6                        | ) |  | (44.5 | ) |  | (15.2 | )
|Benefit (provision) for income taxes         |  | (0.2                        | ) |  | (0.1  | ) |  | 0.0   |  
|                                             |  |                             |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Net loss before minority interests           |  | (5.8                        | ) |  | (44.6 | ) |  | (15.2 | )
|Minority interests                           |  | 0.0                         |   |  | 0.1   |   |  | 0.0   |  
|                                             |  |                             |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|Net loss                                     |  | (5.8                        | ) |  | (44.5 | ) |  | (15.2 | )
|                                             |  |                             |   |  |       |   |  |       |  



24



---

##### Table of Contents

Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2006 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005

Net Sales. Our net sales include sales of finished goods, parts and accessories, and tooling income from procuring, designing and manufacturing
molds for certain products that our customers choose to own. Tooling income is not a primary source of our sales revenue and is immaterial to overall sales. Net sales consist of gross amounts invoiced less discounts and returns. Revenues from
product sales are recognized at the time of shipment when title passes. Under the Companys standard terms and conditions of sale, which are mainly FOB shipment point, title and risk of loss transfer to the customer at the time product is
delivered to the customers freight forwarder, and revenue is recognized accordingly unless customer acceptance is uncertain or significant obligations remain. It is rare to have any contingency concerning title passing when explicit shipping
terms are stated. We do not recognize sales for those products where the customer has any right of return. Returns historically have been immaterial.

Net sales in fiscal 2006 increased approximately 76.0% to $73.8 million from $41.9 million in fiscal 2005. The increase was primarily due to an increase in sales of floor care products and $5.8 million in net sales of
CCMs, a new product category for us.

Net sales are comprised of sales in our two major product categories for these periods: floor care
and kitchen appliances products as well as sales of CCMs. Sales in each major category for fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 were as follows:



| |  |  | floor care products sales increased to $54.6 million, or 73.9% of net sales, from $29.6 million, or 70.8% of net sales, primarily due to new floor care models contracted for by our
two major customers.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | kitchen appliances sales decreased to $7.3 million, or 9.9% of net sales, from $7.6 million, or 18.2% of net sales, primarily due to a decrease in sales of coffeemakers,
breadmakers, and food steamers partially offset by increased sales of deep fryers.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | sales of CCMs, a new product for us in fiscal 2006 amounted to $5.8 million
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In fiscal 2006, sales to North America accounted for $54.4 million or 73.8% of net sales as compared to $36.0 million, or 86.0% of net sales in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2006, sales to Asian countries increased by
approximately $8.2 million to $10.4 million, or 14.1% of net sales in fiscal 2006 from $2.2 million, or 5.3% in fiscal 2005. The increased Asian sales were primarily due to the sales of CCMs.

In fiscal 2006, our shipments of display products amounted to approximately $3.0 million compared to less than $1.0 million in fiscal 2005 but consisted
mainly of sales of LCD panels from inventory as we liquidated our display assets.

Gross profit (loss). Gross profit or loss
consists of net sales less cost of goods sold, which includes the costs of raw materials, production materials, labor, transportation, depreciation and factory overhead. Gross profit in fiscal 2006 was $4.0 million or 5.4% of net sales, as compared
to a gross loss of $2.7 million or 6.6% of net sales in fiscal 2005. The improvement in gross margin as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to higher production levels absorbing fixed overhead offset by higher material costs particularly for
plastics and steel. Additionally we continued reducing selling prices to our two main floor care customers to remain competitive with other OEM suppliers in China and Korea. In fiscal 2006, our raw material costs as a percentage of net sales was
76.4% as compared to 70.5% in fiscal 2005. We believe that the increase in raw material commodity pricing while significant in 2006 will continue accelerating in fiscal 2007 and we will make further attempts to get pricing relief from our customers.
See Item 11Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.

Labor and overhead expenses as a percentage of sales were 3.6%
and 11.0% respectively in 2006. Included in overhead of $8.3 million was a provision for obsolete inventory of $1.4 million as we discontinued selling a number of kitchen appliance SKUs and incurred a further write down of our display inventories,
which provisions amounted to $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Overhead in fiscal 2005 was $13.0 million but included $1.2 million in impairment and $3.8 million in obsolescence charges. Excluding the aforesaid items overhead only
increased approximately 10% in 2006 from the prior year despite a 76% increase in sales.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses. The primary components of our selling, general and
administrative (SG&A) expenses are related to product design and development, transportation of finished goods, salaries for marketing and administrative personnel, professional fees, non cash compensation expense and utilities.
SG&A expenses in fiscal 2006 were $18.0 million or 24.4% of our net sales, as compared to $16.1 million, or 38.4% of net sales in fiscal 2005. Shipping, handling or other costs that are incurred for the sale of products are classified as selling
expenses. The shipping expense relates to inland freight from the factory to the port, where title is passed to the customer. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, shipping costs charged to selling expenses were approximately
$1.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

Included in SG&A expenses in fiscal 2006 were an impairment charge of $2.1 million and a
reversal of stock compensation expense of $0.2 million. Excluding these items SG&A was $16.1 million or 21.8% of net sales versus an equivalent of $18.1 million or 43.2% of net sales in the prior year.

The decrease in SG&A expense was primarily due to de-emphasizing the display business and a reduction in our core business sales and administrative
staff. Out of the total SG&A expenses in fiscal 2006, $0.5 million relates to our new CCM business and $4.6 million to our various display activities compared to $6.5 million in fiscal 2005. We expect some lingering display related SG&A in
fiscal 2007 but we expect it will be materially reduced from fiscal 2006.

The primary components of design and development expenses
included in SG&A include design and prototyping costs, patent fees, testing charges, inspection fees and salaries for engineers and designers. In fiscal 2006, total product development expenses were approximately $1.7 million, as compared to
$2.5 million in fiscal 2005. Of the $1.7 million, $0.1 million and $1.3 million were incurred in the display and CCM and electronic component programs, respectively.

Due to the pressure on margins we are experiencing in our business, we determined that our SG&A needs to be reduced further. Steps have been taken subsequent to the end of our fiscal 2006 to reduce the technical
and marketing staff commensurate with our decision to drop our ODM program for the core business. Additionally, we are reducing our administrative costs by not replacing managers and executives that have left the Company and by transferring some
functions to China.

Other operating income (loss).In fiscal 2006, we recognized other operating income of approximately
$2.4 million, compared to other operating loss of approximately $0.8 million in fiscal 2005. The income in 2006 included accruing a contingent loss of $4.7 million relating to a potential judgment against one of our subsidiaries, offset by awards of
$4.6 million related to a breach of contract claim (See Note 23  Contingent liabilities of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) and $2.4 million related to a patent infringement claim adjudicated and finalized in fiscal 2006.

Operating income (loss).In fiscal 2006, we incurred an operating loss of $14.0 million, as compared to an operating
loss of $19.6 million in fiscal 2005. The loss in 2006 was mainly due to our gross profit being insufficient to support our SG&A and continuing losses in our display business.

Interest expense, interest income and other income (expenses), net. Interest expense consists of interest on short-term and long-term bank credit
facilities. Interest expense was approximately $55,000 in fiscal 2006 as compared to $10,000 in fiscal 2005. The increase in interest expense was due to the use of an average of $700,000 of our overdraft facility under our line of credit from April
2005 to November 2005. Interest income in fiscal 2006 was approximately $1.3 million as compared to $1.0 million in fiscal 2005. The increase was due to the increase in interest rates in the funds invested by the Company. The funds are primarily
invested in low risk financial instruments. In fiscal 2006, we had an average invested fund balance which includes cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $47.2 million with an average rate of return of approximately
2.9% as compared to an average invested fund balance of approximately $44.8 million with an average rate of return of approximately 2.1% in fiscal 2005. Other expenses, net in fiscal 2006 were approximately $0.8 million compared to other income, net
in fiscal 2005 of $0.03 million. For a breakdown of our other income (expenses), net see Note 18  Other income (expenses), net of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income tax. Our financial statements include a benefit (provision) for profits tax of approximately ($23,000) and $34,000 in fiscal 2006 and 2005,
respectively, due to certain of our subsidiaries either being profitable or entitled to a tax refund.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

We are not subject to taxation in the British Virgin Islands in accordance with British Virgin Islands
tax regulations. We are subject to income tax in each jurisdiction where our subsidiaries do business. Certain of our income accrues in China, where the effective tax rate is 27.0%, and in Hong Kong, where the corporate tax rate is 17.5%, on income
from operations but excluding interest, dividend income and capital gains. In Hong Kong, estimated taxes for each fiscal year are paid during the year based on the prior years taxable earnings from operations. An adjustment in the form of
additional taxes paid or refunds to us is then made in the following fiscal year based on actual taxable earnings. Therefore, in each fiscal year, our statement of operations reflects a provision for estimated taxes for the current fiscal year and
adjustments for over- or under-provision with respect to the prior fiscal year.

Our Chinese subsidiaries are subject to income tax based
upon the taxable income as reported in the statutory financial statements prepared under Chinese accounting regulations. Our subsidiary in China was exempted from income tax for two years starting from its first profitable year (after utilizing
accumulated tax loss carry forwards or a lapse of five years) followed by a 50% exemption for the next three years. Commencing January 1, 2004, one of our subsidiaries in China is subject to the full tax rate of 27.0%. This Chinese subsidiary
is our manufacturing facility that incurs a significant portion of our manufacturing overhead. This subsidiary makes sales of finished goods to our other subsidiaries. For these reasons, we do not believe the full tax rate will have a significant
impact on our financial condition or results of operations. In fiscal 2004, we established a new subsidiary in China, Dongguan Lite Array, which is also exempted from income tax for a two-year period effective from its profitable year followed by a
50% exemption for the next three years. In fiscal 2005, our U.S. subsidiary, Lite Array, engaged in trading of OLED raw materials and components to our other subsidiaries. The sales amount was immaterial. We do not believe there was taxable income
as this subsidiary incurred a loss and there was also a tax loss carry forward. To the extent that we have income effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business in any fiscal year, we would be subject to U.S. taxes at an
effective rate up to 55%. The trading of OLED raw materials and components was ceased as we have shifted our focus to development of OLED systems. We do not believe that our current method of operations subjects us to U.S. taxes. We have established
a subsidiary in Macau, China where we conduct sales, marketing, administration and other activities. Similar to our subsidiaries established in the British Virgin Islands, we are not subject to taxation in Macau although the Hong Kong Inland Revenue
Department may choose to assess Hong Kong taxes on any profits generated in Macau.

Minority interests. We recorded a share of loss
by a minority interest of a newly acquired subsidiary of approximately $13,000 and $20,000 in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Net
loss. Net loss for fiscal 2006 was $11.2 million or $0.92 per share, as compared to a net loss of $18.6 million, or $1.52 per share for the fiscal 2005.

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2004

Net Sales. Our net sales include sales of finished goods, parts and accessories, and tooling income from procuring, designing and
manufacturing molds for certain products that our customers choose to own. Tooling income is not a primary source of our sales revenue and is immaterial to overall sales. Net sales consists of gross amounts invoiced less discounts and returns.
Revenues from product sales are recognized at the time of shipment when title passes. Under the Companys standard terms and conditions of sales, which are mainly FOB shipment point, title and risk of loss transfer to the customer at the time
the product is delivered to the customers freight forwarder, and revenue is recognized accordingly unless customer acceptance is uncertain or significant obligations remain. It is rare to have any contingency concerning the title passing when
explicit shipping terms are stated. We do not recognize sales for those products where the customer has any right of return. Returns historically have been immaterial.

Net sales in fiscal 2005 decreased approximately 37.4% to $41.9 million from $66.9 million in fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2004 and 2005, our net sales included approximately $0.9 million and $1.3 million of tooling income,
respectively. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to declining sales in floor care products and kitchen appliances.

Net sales are
comprised of sales in our two major product categories: floor care and kitchen appliances products. Sales in each major category for fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004 were as follows:



| |  |  | Sales of floor care products decreased to $29.6 million or 70.8% of net sales from $49.7 million or 74.3% of net sales. The decrease in sales was primarily due to decreased sales of
existing floor care products to Royal which was only partially offset by the sales of new models. In addition, our only shipments to Electrolux occurred late in fiscal 2005.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Sales of kitchen appliances decreased to $7.6 million or 18.2% of net sales, from $12.0 million or 18.0% of net sales, primarily due to decreased sales of coffeemakers and deep
fryers, which was partially offset by the increased sales of lemonade makers.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



27



---

##### Table of Contents

In fiscal 2005, sales of floor care products decreased by approximately $20.1 million from fiscal 2004.
Our two major floor care products customers, Royal and Electrolux accounted for 62.7% and 10.3% of our net sales in fiscal 2005, as compared to 48.4% and 26.1% in fiscal 2004. In recent years, we have established a business relationship with
Electrolux. There were no sales to this customer in the first three quarters of this fiscal year as they had sufficient inventory of an older discontinued model on hand and we were also still finalizing the engineering specifications for a new floor
care product which we began shipping in late fiscal 2005.

In fiscal 2005, we began shipping LCD and plasma TVs. These sales generated
revenues of approximately $450,000 or 1.1% of our net sales. In addition we took in aggregate an approximately $4.7 million impairment charge against our display assets including manufacturing and R&D equipment and the write down of our panel
inventory to market value.

Gross profit (loss). Gross profit or loss consists of net sales less cost of goods sold, which
includes the costs of raw materials, production materials, labor, transportation, depreciation and factory overhead. Gross loss in fiscal 2005 was $2.7 million or 6.6% of net sales, as compared to a gross profit of $14.0 million or 20.9% of net
sales in fiscal 2004. The decrease in gross profit in fiscal 2005 was primarily due to higher material costs and overhead expenses being absorbed over lower net sales. In addition, there was insufficient sales revenue generated from the Global
Display and OLED programs to offset their manufacturing overhead.

Raw material costs as a percentage of net sales was approximately 70.5%
as compared to 63.6% in fiscal 2004. Included in the material costs were approximately $0.5 million and $0.7 million of inbound freight charges in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. We only include inbound freight charges, receiving, inspection and
warehousing and other internal transfer costs in the cost of goods sold and exclude customs declaration and insurance expenses incurred for raw materials acquisition. In fiscal 2005, material costs including plastic resin, metal and motor components
that were mostly used in the manufacturing of floor care products, increased approximately 10.0% and we could not pass this increase through to our customers. In particular, we are required to use higher grade plastic resins, which are more
expensive, in our manufacture of floor care products. Part of the decrease in net sales also resulted from a price reduction for certain floor care products we offered to retain business; therefore our cost of raw materials, while decreasing in
absolute amounts, increased significantly as a percentage of net sales. See Item 11  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.

Factory overhead was $15.1 million or 36.1% of net sales in the fiscal 2005, as compared to $10.4 million, or 15.5% of net sales in the fiscal 2004. Included in factory overhead for fiscal 2005 was $1.2 million of
impairment charges of which $0.3 million and $0.9 million related to our core business and display program, respectively. In addition, we made a provision against our inventory of approximately $3.8 million of which $3.5 million related to
writing down our display panels to market value and the remaining $0.3 million was for our core business. In fiscal 2005, cost of sales included $0.5 million of minimum royalty for our OLED program whereas in fiscal 2004 such royalty was included in
selling, general and administrative expenses since there were no sales of licensed product. This minimum royalty far exceeded our net sales of OLED displays.

The sales revenue generated from Global Display and OLED programs after deducting the raw material costs was insufficient to cover the overhead expenses incurred by these programs. The excess was absorbed by the core
business, thus contributing to a gross loss in fiscal 2005.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. The primary
components of our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses are related to advertisement and promotion, product design and development, transportation of finished goods, salaries for marketing and administrative personnel,
professional fees and utilities. SG&A expenses in fiscal 2005 were $16.1 million or 38.4% of our net sales as compared to $19.0 million, or 28.4% of net sales in fiscal 2004. Shipping expense included in SG&A relates to inland freight from
the factory to the port, where title is passed to the customer. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, shipping and handling costs charged to selling expenses were approximately $0.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively.

Out of the total SG&A expenses in fiscal 2005, $10.4 million, $4.3 million and $2.2 million respectively were attributable to our core
business, Global Display and OLED programs as compared to $14.8 million, $2.0 million and $2.2 million in fiscal 2004. The



28



---

##### Table of Contents

decrease in SG&A expenses in fiscal 2005 was primarily due to a non-cash stock compensation expense of approximately $2.4 million recognized in fiscal
2004, compared to a reversal of $1.2 million in fiscal 2005, relating to variable accounting for stock options. Approximately 347,538 of the options subject to variable accounting were voluntarily cancelled in September 2005. Excluding the effect of
this non-cash stock compensation expense, SG&A expenses were $18.1 million and $16.6 million in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. The aggregate increase of $2.3 million incurred by the Global Display program was the main contributor to our
total SG&A expenses increasing by $1.5 million. Lower shipping expense due to lower volume and reductions in the engineering and administrative staff in our core business offset some of the increase in salaries and depreciation and amortization
charges in our display and OLED programs.

The primary components of design and development expenses included in SG&A include design
and prototyping costs, patent fees, testing charges, inspection fees and salaries for engineers and designers. In fiscal 2005, total product development expenses were approximately $2.5 million, as compared to $2.3 million in fiscal 2004. Out of the
total approximately $2.5 million in fiscal 2005, $1.1 million was incurred for our core business, $1.2 million for displays and $0.2 million for our OLED program, as compared to $1.3 million, $0.7 million and $0.3 million for our core business,
Global Display and OLED programs in fiscal 2004, respectively. These expenses were primarily attributable to salaries and wages for the research and development staff and sample and design fees incurred for new programs.

Other operating expenses. Included in fiscal 2005 are other operating expenses of $0.8 million representing a contingent loss provision for
pending litigation. See Note 23 (c)  Contingent liabilities of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details of the litigation.

Interest expense, interest income and other income, net. Interest expense consists of interest on short-term and long-term bank credit facilities. Interest expense was approximately $9,900 in fiscal 2005 as compared to $18,000
in fiscal 2004. The decrease in interest expense was mainly due to a maturity of a long-term loan and decreased borrowing requirements. Interest income was approximately $977,000 in fiscal 2005 as compared to $851,000 in fiscal 2004. Other income,
net was approximately $32,000 and $428,000 in fiscal 2005 and 2004, respectively. For a breakdown, see Note 18  Other income (expenses), net of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income tax. Our financial statements include a provision for profits tax of approximately $34,000 and $108,000 in fiscal 2005 and 2004,
respectively, due to some of our subsidiaries being profitable and thus subject to tax.

We are not subject to taxation in the British
Virgin Islands in accordance with British Virgin Islands tax regulations. We are subject to income tax in each jurisdiction in which our subsidiaries do business. Certain of our income accrues in China, where the effective tax rate is 27.0%, and in
Hong Kong, where the corporate tax rate is 17.5%, on income from operations but excluding interest, dividend income and capital gains. In Hong Kong, estimated taxes for each fiscal year are paid during the year based on the prior years taxable
earnings from operations. An adjustment in the form of additional taxes paid or refunds to us is then made in the following fiscal year based on actual taxable earnings. Therefore, in each fiscal year, our statement of operations reflects a
provision for estimated taxes for the current fiscal year and adjustments for over- or under-provision with respect to the prior fiscal year.

Our Chinese subsidiaries are subject to income tax based upon the taxable income as reported in the statutory financial statements prepared under Chinese accounting regulations. Our subsidiary in China was exempted from income tax for two
years beginning with its first profitable year (after utilizing accumulated tax loss carry forwards or a lapse of five years) followed by a 50% exemption for the next three years. In September 2002, our subsidiary in China filed amended tax returns
with the tax authorities for the periods of 1995 to 2002. The PRC tax authorities confirmed our amended tax returns as submitted, establishing the first profitable year as 1999. Our Chinese subsidiary was not, therefore, subject to tax for 1999 and
2000 and received a 50% exemption for the years from 2001 to 2003. Commencing January 1, 2004, our subsidiary in China is subject to the full tax rate of 27.0%. This Chinese subsidiary is our manufacturing facility that incurs a significant
portion of our manufacturing overhead. This subsidiary makes sales of finished goods to our other subsidiaries. For these reasons, we do not believe the full tax rate will have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of
operations. In fiscal 2004, we established a new subsidiary in China, Dongguan Lite Array, which is also exempted from income tax for a two-year period effective from its profitable year followed by a 50% exemption for the next three years. In
fiscal 2005, our U.S. subsidiary, Lite Array, engaged in trading of OLED raw materials and components to our other subsidiaries. The sales amount was immaterial. We do not believe there was taxable income as this subsidiary incurred a loss and there
was also a tax loss carry forward. To the extent that we have income effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business in any fiscal year, we would be subject to U.S. taxes at an effective rate up to 55%. We do not believe that our
current method of operations subjects us to U.S. taxes. We have established a subsidiary in Macau, China where we conduct sales, marketing,



29



---

##### Table of Contents

administration and other activities. Similar to our subsidiaries established in the British Virgin Islands, we are not
subject to taxation in Macau in accordance with Macau tax regulations. However Hong Kong tax authorities can challenge the Companys activities in Macau to determine whether same profits could be attributable to Hong Kong.

Minority interests. In fiscal 2005, we recorded a share of loss by a minority interest of a newly acquired subsidiary of approximately
$20,000.

Net loss. Net loss for fiscal 2005 was $18.6 million or $1.52 per share, as compared to a net loss of $3.9 million,
or $0.32 per share for fiscal 2004.



|B. | Liquidity and Capital Resources.
|-- | --------------------------------

Our primary source of financing has been cash generated from operating activities. During fiscal 2006, we used approximately $0.8 million of cash in our operating activities as compared to $12.8 million in fiscal 2005. The reduction in
negative cash flow in fiscal 2006 is due primarily to non-cash charges in 2006 being $1.9 million higher and a swing in inventory from an increase in fiscal 2005 to a decrease in 2006 of $13.4 million. Inventory decreased in 2006 as we liquidated
display inventory accumulated in 2005. The cash flow generated from inventory reduction was offset by a higher level of receivables due to the increased level of business.

Working capital as of March 31, 2006 was $53.1 million compared to $58.2 million as of March 31, 2005. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments declined $2.2 million, inventories declined $3.3 million and receivables increased $1.2 million from the prior year.

During
fiscal 2006, we sold $5.0 million of callable deposits at a loss of $350,000 due to rising interest rates affecting principle value. All of our cash is now in very short term safe securities since short-term interest rates provide a reasonable
return. We plan to manage our business so that our cash and short-term investments, which were $46.0 million at March 31, 2006, will increase to approximately $50.0 million by the end of 2007.

Accounts and bills receivable were $8.4 million at the end of fiscal 2006, compared to $7.2 million at the end of fiscal 2005. Receivables at
March 31, 2006 represented 42 days of sales compared to 63 days of sales at March 31, 2005, primarily due to the timing of shipments prior to year end. Sales to Royal and Electrolux represented 40.4% and 34.1% of sales, respectively in
fiscal 2006. These two floor care customers enjoy the same extended credit terms and will continue to maintain such terms for the foreseeable future.

During fiscal 2006, we received approximately $2.4 million from an award determined in a U.S. Court and also won a net judgment of $4.6 million (or $5.2 million including interest) which is being held in escrow
pending an appeal of a judgment against a subsidiary of the Company in the amount of $4.6 million. Due to the two latter amounts offsetting, there is no material impact on operations for fiscal 2006 from the judgments even though the receipt is
certain and the potential payment is uncertain at this time. See Note 23  Contingent liabilities to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In October 1998, we made a loan to a start-up U.S. corporation wholly owned by the spouse of an executive of ours in the original principal amount of $1.0 million, bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 7.0% and
payable in quarterly installments of approximately $81,000 commencing October 28, 2003, with any remaining balance due in full on October 28, 2008. As of March 31, 2004, accrued interest on the loan was approximately $700,000. We had
reserved fully against the interest due. Effective April 30, 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of this company for $1,000. There was no gain or loss recorded by us as a result of this acquisition since the only assets acquired
were cash, short term investments and subscription receivable and we had continued to carry this loan at the same amount as the underlying cash value and short term investments.

In October 1999, we made a loan to an officer for the purchase of a residence and office. The loan was in the principal amount of $460,000, bearing
interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.02%, and was secured by a mortgage on the property. The loan was payable in six years with annual installments of approximately $77,000 of principal together with interest on the unpaid principal balance,
commencing October 21, 2000. Payments on the loan were forgiven in arrears, however, on each payment due date in consideration for the directors continued service to us. The loan was satisfied in full in fiscal 2006. All transactions with
our executive officers and directors must be approved by a majority of our independent directors.



30



---

##### Table of Contents

Our aggregate capital expenditures during fiscal 2006 and 2005 were $1.4 million and $3.5 million,
respectively. Capital expenditures in fiscal 2006 primarily included construction of a clean room and purchase of equipment and machinery, most of which was devoted to our CCM program. We had incurred an aggregate of approximately $3.3 million in
capital expenses to date for a clean room and equipment in our Dongguan facility to support our OLED display development program which are being transferred into our venture with Anwell as part of out capital contribution. Our capital commitments as
of March 31, 2006 were approximately $31,000 for the acquisition of tooling and purchase of equipment.

During fiscal 2004, we made a
$5.0 million multi-callable deposit that was due to mature on August 11, 2008. The deposit carried variable interest rates of up to 2.5% per annum. The bank had the right to terminate the deposit in full and repay our money on the 11th day
of February, May, August and November, commencing November 11, 2003. We decided to access these funds prior to maturity, which required us to fully reimburse the bank for its losses and indemnify it for the costs incurred as a result of its
terminating, liquidating, obtaining or re-establishing any hedge or related trading position. This amounted to $350,000, which was reflected in other income (expenses), net.

At the beginning fiscal 2005, we had an aggregate outstanding long-term debt of $374,000. As of March 31, 2005, it had all been repaid. We do not
anticipate engaging into any long-term debt arrangement in the reasonably near future. However, there is no assurance that we will not enter into such another loan arrangement for acquiring capital assets for new business development or existing
business expansion.

Our revolving credit facilities are with Standard Chartered Bank and Hong Kong Bank with an aggregate facilities limit
of approximately $4.1 million as of March 31, 2006. The banking facilities provided by Standard Chartered Bank and Hong Kong Bank bear interest at floating commercial bank lending rates in Hong Kong. The amounts payable each month on the
revolving credit facilities varies depending upon the amounts drawn at the time. Our outstanding borrowings traditionally vary according to our seasonal working capital requirements and during 2006 we utilized this line for overdrafts of up to $1.3
million during the period from April 2005 to November 2005, but did not utilize it for the remainder of the year except for issuing bills payable and letters of credit. Our subsidiary in the U.S., Lite Array, Inc. has an aggregate outstanding
short-term loan of approximately $38,000 with NC Two, LP, at an interest rate of 13.99% per annum.

We are in compliance with all
of the covenants entered into with our banks in connection with the revolving credit agreements and have been in compliance during all periods presented. In addition, we have not entered into any cross-default provision in our debt agreements with
our banks. However, since the agreements are subject to periodic review by our banks, which may result in changes of their terms and conditions, there can be no assurance that our agreements will not be subject to cross-default provisions in the
future.

We anticipate that cash from operating activities and our quick assets should be adequate to satisfy our capital requirements for
at least the next two years.

Our acquisition of Lite Array was completed in May 2001. Total consideration for our investment in Lite Array
was approximately $9.6 million, of which approximately $3.8 million was settled in cash and we took responsibility for paying the balance due on a license of $1.8 million. The remaining portion of the consideration was satisfied in exchange of
convertible notes issued by Lite Array in fiscal 2001. Sometime after making our investment decision, as part of our analysis of the potential for Lite Arrays TFEL display business and its joint venture operation, we determined that the
long-term prospects were limited. We decided to discontinue the production of TFEL displays and cease funding the joint venture in China as of September 30, 2002. We decided to write off the value of Lite Arrays investment in the joint
venture, the goodwill associated with the TFEL display business and certain TFEL production equipment owned by us. In fiscal 2003, we sold the TFEL display business to the former management of Lite Array.

Pursuant to the small molecule OLED license we assumed as a result of our acquisition of Lite Array, we were required to pay royalties of a fixed
percentage of the net sales of OLED display products that are produced by using the licensed know-how and sold by Lite Array and its subsidiaries before January 1, 2004. Lite Array must pay royalties of the greater of a fixed amount or a fixed
percentage of the net sales of OLED display products that are produced by using the licensed know-how and sold by Lite Array and its subsidiaries after January 1, 2004. The license expires in 2023 and could be terminated at any time by us after
January 1, 2004. During fiscal 2005, Lite Array was still in the research and development stage and we were paying a fixed amount of the royalties on an annual basis. We ceased using the licensed know-how in 2006 and discontinued royalty
payments.



31



---

##### Table of Contents

On January 7, 2003, we entered into an asset purchase and lease agreement with Opsys. We purchased
their research and development experimental production equipment for small molecule OLED displays for $1.0 million. Concurrent with the purchase of the equipment, we leased it back to Opsys through February 28, 2003 for a rental payment of
$1,000 per month. Upon the execution of the purchase and lease agreement, we were granted a warrant to purchase securities of Opsys (and of any of its affiliates that raised capital) having an aggregate valuation of $2.0 million, with such warrants
having an exercise price of $0.0001 per share. At the time of the execution of the purchase and lease agreement, we believed that the purchase of the equipment and the opportunity to acquire such securities would accelerate our progress in OLED
product development. An involuntary proceeding under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code was commenced against Opsys on May 3, 2003. On September 4, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California issued an
order to allow us to proceed with removal of the equipment located in Opsys business location. We removed and shipped the equipment to our facility in Dongguan, China for re-installation. We established a prototype line there in a new clean
room which is capable of research and development functions and production of prototypes. This line is part of the assets we contributed to our joint venture with Anwell to develop a more cost effective process for producing OLED equipment rather
than continuing to only produce OLED displays.

Inflation. From 2001 through May 2006, the rate of inflation in Hong Kong has
ranged from approximately -4.0% to 2.6% per year (approximately 1.1% during 2005 and 2.0% for the first five months of 2006) and the average rate of inflation in China ranged from approximately -2.2% to 9.8% per year (approximately 1.8%
during 2005 and 1.3% for the first five months of 2006). As a general matter, the effect of this inflation with respect to our business is primarily limited to labor costs, which represent a small component of our total expenses. Because we purchase
most of our raw materials from outside China, inflation in China does not have a significant effect on our overall costs.

Currency
and exchange rates. The functional currency of our company is the U.S. dollar. The functional currencies of our subsidiaries in the locations outside the U.S. are either the respective local currencies or the U.S. dollars. Nearly all of our
sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. The majority of our expenses, including salaries and wages and other production and administrative costs are denominated in Hong Kong dollars and Chinese Renminbi. Certain raw materials and capital equipment
are purchased using a variety of currencies including the U.S. dollar, Chinese Renminbi, Japanese yen and EURO, but the majority are purchased using Hong Kong dollars which is pegged to the U.S. dollar. During 2005, we had a long-term loan
denominated in EUROs, which was fully paid-off as of March 31, 2005. In aggregate, we have not been significantly affected by exchange rate fluctuations and therefore have not needed to hedge our positions. See Note 3(n) of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies.

The Company believes the following critical accounting policies and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements can affect
its results of operations. The policies set forth below require managements most subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to estimate the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.



| |  |  | Valuation of property, plant and equipment. We assess impairment periodically for property, plant and equipment when events indicate that future operations will not produce
sufficient revenue to cover the related future costs. Impairment losses are recognized when the sum of expected future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) are less than the carrying amount of the assets.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Impairment of intangible assets. An appraisal of the fair market value of the license for small molecule PM-OLED technology was performed by an independent appraisal company and
this amount was used in our purchase accounting. Based upon the license value and our evaluation of the life of the technology before it is superseded, we determined that the license would be amortized over seven years. Each year we evaluate whether
there is any impairment in the carrying value based on an analysis of the financial plan for the OLED display business, a discounted cash flow analysis and an update from the appraisal company. In fiscal 2006 we determined this license was fully
impaired.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Deferred tax valuation allowance. We account for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109. Deferred tax assets are recognized for losses carried forward but we provide
a valuation allowance if we believe that these losses are more likely than not to be utilized. We consider future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for such a valuation allowance. In the
event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize any deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to earnings in the period such determination was made. Likewise, if we later determined
that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



32



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Inventory reserves. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost, calculated on the weighted average basis, comprises materials and, where applicable, direct
labor and an appropriate proportion of production overhead expenditure. Market value represents the latest cost quotation less anticipated disposal costs.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Allowance for doubtful accounts. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the
financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be required.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Contingencies. We account for various uncertain events, or contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. Under SFAS No. 5,
contingent losses must be accrued if available information indicates it is probable that the loss has been or will be incurred given the likelihood of the uncertain event, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Management judgment
is required in deciding the amount and timing of accrual of a contingency. For example, legal proceedings are inherently uncertain, and in order to determine the amount of any reserves required, we assess the likelihood of any adverse judgment or
outcomes in any litigation, as well as potential ranges of probable losses. As of March 31, 2006 we had $5.5 million accrued for contingencies.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Recent changes in accounting standards

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 151, Inventory Costs  An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS No. 151). SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the
accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and
rehandling costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of so abnormal as stated in ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production
overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Group has already commenced an assessment of the impact of
SFAS No. 151, but does not believe it will have a material impact on its operations or financial condition.

In December 2004, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)), to replace SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS
No. 123(R) requires, among other thing, that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options, be measured based on their grant-date fair value and recognized as an expense in the financial statements. Pro forma
disclosure is no longer an alternative. The provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) are effective for the annual reporting period that begins on or after December 15, 2005. During the transition period, the Group accounted for shared-based
compensation to employees using APB No. 25s intrinsic value method.

The Group adopted SFAS No. 123(R) for its accounting
period beginning on April 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation expense will be recorded in the financial statements for (i) all awards granted after the adoption of SFAS
No. 123(R) and (ii) future vesting of awards outstanding as of the date of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). The Group believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) could have a material impact on the Groups consolidated results
of operations and earnings per share when it is adopted.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153 Exchanges of Nonmonetary
Assets  An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of
APB Opinion No. 29 Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if
the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Group does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 153
to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition.



33



---

##### Table of Contents

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154 Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3 Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and
changes the requirements of accounting for, and reporting of, a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 carries forward many provisions of APB Opinion No. 20 without change, including the provisions related to the reporting of a
change in accounting estimate, a change in reporting entity, and the correction of an error. SFAS No. 154 carries forward the provisions of SFAS No. 3 that govern reporting accounting changes in interim financial statements. It requires
retrospective application to prior periods financial statements of a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is impracticable. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be
recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires that a change in method of depreciation, amortization or depletion for long-lived,
non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate that is effected by a change in accounting principle. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that such a change be reported as a change in accounting principle. SFAS
No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for accounting changes and corrections of errors made occurring in fiscal years
beginning after June 1, 2005. The Group is currently in the process of evaluating any effect the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2005, the FASBs EITF reached a final consensus on Issue 04-13 Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same
Counterparty. EITF 04-13 requires that two or more legally separate exchange transactions with the same counterparty be combined and considered a single arrangement for the purposes of applying APB Opinion No. 29 Accounting for
Nonmonetary Transactions, when the transactions are entered into in contemplation of one another. EITF 04-13 is effective for new arrangements entered into, or modifications or renewals of existing arrangements, in interim or annual periods
beginning after March 15, 2006. The Group is evaluating the impact of the adoption of EITF 04-13 but it is not expected to have a material impact on the Groups consolidated financial statements.

In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments, which provides guidance on determining when investments in certain debt and equity securities are considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary and on measuring such impairment loss. FSP 115-1 also
includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment and requires disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. FSP115-1 is required to be
applied to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The Group is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of FSP 115-1, but does not expect that it will have a material impact on the Groups consolidated financial
statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. It allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives that otherwise would require bifurcation from the host to be accounted for as a whole, if the holder irrevocably elects to account for the
whole instrument on a fair value basis. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the instrument would be recognized in earnings. The standard also clarifies which interest only and principal only strips are not subject to the requirement of SFAS
No. 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate interest in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation;
clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument.
SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued by the Company after January 1, 2007. The Group is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of SFAF No. 155 but it is not expected to have a material
impact on the Groups consolidated financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued SFAS Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Tax Positions. This interpretation clarifies the application of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements. In addition to recognition, the interpretation provides guidance on the measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition and is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Group is evaluating the potential impact of this interpretation on the results of its future operations and financial condition.



|C. | Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------

We spent approximately $1.7 million, $2.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively, on product design and development in each of fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004. The expense in each year was primarily attributable to the
salaries and wages for the technical staff and prototyping and design fees. For a more complete description of our research and development, patents and licenses, etc., see Item 4.BBusiness OverviewProduct Design and Development
andIntellectual Property Rights.



34



---

##### Table of Contents

|D. | Trend information.
|-- | ------------------

See
Item 5.AOperating and Financial Review and ProspectsOperating Results and Item 5.BOperating and Financial Review and ProspectsLiquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of the most significant
recent trends in our business since the last fiscal year.



|E. | Off-balance sheet arrangements.
|-- | -------------------------------

The Company has no off-balance-sheet arrangements such as guarantees, derivative securities, retained interests or variable interests that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material effect on the Companys financial condition,
revenue and expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures and capital resources.



|F. | Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations:
|-- | ----------------------------------------------

The
following is a schedule reflecting our aggregate financial commitments as of March 31, 2006:



|                                |  |       |         |                 |   |           |  |           |         |           |   |                  |   |  |  
|------------------------------- |  | ----- | ------- | --------------- | - | --------- |  | --------- | ------- | --------- | - | ---------------- | - |  | -
|Contractual Obligations         |  | Total |         | Less than1 year |   | 1-2 years |  | 2-3 years |         | 3-4 years |   | More than4 years
|Capital Commitments (1)         |  | $     | 31,484  |                 | $ | 31,484    |  |           |        |           |  |                  |  |  | 
|Operating Lease Commitments (2) |  | $     | 284,959 |                 | $ | 163,675   |  | $         | 121,284 |           |  |                  |  |  | 
|Purchase Obligations            |  |       |        |                 |   |          |  |           |        |           |  |                  |  |  | 
|Other Liabilities (3)           |  | $     | 500,000 |                 | $ | 500,000   |  |           |        |           |  |                  |  |  | 
|                                |  |       |         |                 |   |           |  |           |         |           |   |                  |   |  |  
|Total Contractual Obligations   |  | $     | 816,443 |                 | $ | 695,159   |  | $         | 121,284 |           |  |                  |  |  | 



|(1) | Our capital commitments are for the purchase of property, plant and equipment.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | We have various operating lease agreements for parking lots, motor vehicles, equipment and real estate that extend through 2008.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Includes minimum royalties payable.
|--- | -----------------------------------



|Item | 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------



|A. | Directors and senior management.
|-- | --------------------------------

Our
directors and senior management at March 31, 2006 are set forth below:



|                         |  |     |  |                                                            
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Name                     |  | Age |  | Position                                                   
|Kwong Ho Sham            |  | 73  |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors                         
|                         |  |    
|John C.K. Sham (1)       |  | 43  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director            
|                         |  |    
|Brian Yuen (1)(2)        |  | 51  |  | Chief Executive Officer, Global-Tech USA, Inc. and Director
|                         |  |    
|Norris Lo Yan Lam (4)    |  | 52  |  | Chief Operating Officer, Pentalpha Hong Kong Limited       
|                         |  |    
|Patrick Po-On Hui (2)(3) |  | 48  |  | Director                                                   
|                         |  |    
|Ken Ying-Keung Wong (3)  |  | 57  |  | Director                                                   
|                         |  |    
|Barry J. Buttifant (3)   |  | 61  |  | Director                                                   
|                         |  |    
|Kin Shek Leung           |  | 42  |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer                             



|(1) | Member of the finance committee.
|--- | --------------------------------

|(2) | Member of the compensation committee.
|--- | -------------------------------------

|(3) | Member of the audit committee.
|--- | ------------------------------

|(4) | Resigned May 3, 2006.
|--- | ---------------------



35



---

##### Table of Contents

Kwong Ho Sham is our founder and has been our Chairman of the Board of Directors since our
inception in 1963. Mr. Sham has expertise in the area of production engineering and manufacturing. He serves as the Honorary Chairman of the Hong Kong-Shantou Chamber of Commerce, Honorary Chairman of the Hong Kong Chiu Chou Plastics Business
Association, and Honorary Chairman of the Overseas Chinese Association of Chiu Chou and was Honorary Chairman and Treasurer of the Hong Kong-Guangdong Committee for the Celebration of the Reunification.

John C.K. Sham has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since June 1992 and has served as a director of Global-Tech since
July 1991. Mr. Sham was our Chief Financial Officer from June 1992 through January 2002. Mr. Sham joined us in 1984 as managing director of Kwong Lee Shun Trading Company Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of ours. From 1982 to 1984,
Mr. Sham served as President of Wesi Corp., a New York corporation which specialized in the marketing and distribution of household goods.

Brian Yuen joined us in January 1997, was elected to our Board of Directors in August 1997 and became the Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary Global-Tech USA, Inc. in October 1997. Mr. Yuen serves as the chairman of
the finance committee of our Board of Directors and was a consultant to us from March 1994 to December 1996. Prior to joining us, Mr. Yuen served as purchasing manager of Magla Products, Inc., a manufacturer, importer and distributor of
household products, from December 1992 to December 1996.

Norris Lo Yan Lam was hired to serve as the Chief Operating Officer
of the Companys subsidiary, Pentalpha Hong Kong Limited, effective August 11, 2003. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Lam was President and Chief Executive Officer of Team Concepts Holding Limited, an electronic products
manufacturing company. From March 1996 to June 2000, Mr. Lam served as General Manager of various subsidiaries of Mattel, Inc. Mr. Lam, prior to joining Mattel, worked in various sales and marketing positions, primarily in the toy
industry. Mr. Lam subsequently resigned on May 3, 2006.

Patrick Po-On Hui has served as a director of Global-Tech
since March 2000. Mr. Hui is a practicing attorney who, since June 1988, has been a consultant to Robin Bridge & John Liu, a law firm based in Hong Kong. Mr. Hui was an Associate Partner of the law firm of Johnson
Stokes & Master from March 1996 to May 1998 and an Assistant Solicitor of that firm from September 1989 to February 1996.

Ken Ying-Keung Wonghas served as a director of Global-Tech since June 2001. Dr. Wong is a medical doctor who, since 1995, has maintained a medical practice in Hong Kong. Dr. Wong previously practiced family medicine
in Canada from 1977 to 1995.

Barry John Buttifanthas served as a director of Global-Tech since November 2003. He is
currently the Managing Director of Hsin Chong International Holdings Limited; and the Alternate Director of Hsin Chong Construction Group Limited and Synergis Holdings Limited. Before joining Hsin Chong, Mr. Buttifant was an Operating Partner
of Barings Private Equity Partners Asia Ltd. He also joined Wo Kee Hong (Holdings) Limited (Wo Kee Hong) in 2001 as the Managing Director and became the Advisor to the board of directors of Wo Kee Hong from 2002 to 2004. He was the
Managing Director of IDT International Limited for over 8 years and had worked for Sime Darby Hong Kong Limited and Polly Peck Group for more than 11 years in the capacity of Finance Director and Managing Director during the period.
Mr. Buttifant is an independent non-executive director of a number of listed companies in Hong Kong, including Giordano International Limited, Daiwa Associate Holdings Limited and Alltronics Holdings Limited.

Mr. Buttifant is a fellow member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants and the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
He is also a fellow member of the Chartered Management Institute; the Hong Kong Management Association and the Hong Kong Institute of Directors.

Kin Shek Leunghas been our Group Accounting Manager with overall responsibility for the group accounting and finance functions since August 1994. In January 2002, he was appointed to the role of acting Chief Financial
Officer.

No family relationship exists among any of our directors and senior management, except for the following:



| |  |  | Kwong Ho Sham and John Sham are father and son;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------

No
arrangement or understanding exists between any director or member of senior management and any other person pursuant to which any director or member of senior management was elected to such a position with us.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

|B. | Compensation.
|-- | -------------

The aggregate direct
remuneration paid to all directors and senior management as a group (8 persons) during fiscal 2006 was approximately $1.8 million (including a housing allowance for two directors). This includes amounts set aside or accrued to provide pension,
retirement or similar benefits, but does not include amounts (including business travel, professional and business association dues and expenses) reimbursed to officers and other fringe benefits commonly reimbursed or paid for by companies in Hong
Kong.



|C. | Board practices.
|-- | ----------------

Our articles
of association provide for a Board of Directors of not less than five or more than nine members. Each director is elected to serve until the next annual general meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected unless a
different term is specified. Currently, there are six directors of which three are independent directors, serving on the board of the Company. See Item 6A  Directors and senior management for the service time of our directors.

Audit committee. The purpose of the audit committee is to fulfill the Board of Directors oversight responsibility to the
shareholders, potential shareholders and the investment community relating to the integrity of the Companys financial statements and the financial reporting process, the Companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the
independent auditors qualification and independence, the performance of the Companys independent auditors and the annual independent audit of the Companys financial statements. In discharging its oversight role, the audit committee
is empowered by the Companys Board of Directors to investigate any matter brought to its attention. Such investigation can include but is not limited to full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company and the
authority to retain outside counsel or other experts for this purpose.

The Companys audit committee is governed by a written
charter. The functions of the audit committee as enumerated in its charter include:



| |  |  | assisting the Board of Directors oversight of (1) the integrity of the Companys financial statements and the financial reporting process, (2) the
companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent auditors qualifications and independence, (4) the performance of the Companys independent auditors, and (5) the annual independent audit
of the Companys financial statements;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation and retention of the independent auditors for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other
audit, review or attest services for the Company;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | regularly reviewing with the independent auditors any audit problems or difficulties encountered during the course of the audit work, including any restrictions on the scope of the
independent auditors activities or access to requested information;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | meeting with the independent auditors to discuss the scope and plans of their audit engagement;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | meeting with our financial management and independent auditors together, and periodically separately, to review matters relating to internal accounting controls over financial
reporting;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | reviewing our critical accounting policies and practices and other matters relating to our financial condition including any significant written communications between the
independent auditors and management; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | reviewing with the Board of Directors any issues that arise with respect to the quality or integrity of the companys financial statements, compliance with legal or regulatory
requirements and the performance and independence of the independent auditors.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The audit committee is currently comprised of
Barry J. Buttifant, Patrick Po-On Hui, and Ken Ying-Keung Wong. Mr. Barry J. Buttifant is the chairman of the audit committee.

On December 30, 2002, we announced that the Board of Directors had approved the appointment of Ernst & Young in Hong Kong as our independent auditors. Ernst & Young replaced PricewaterhouseCoopers in Hong Kong as our
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2003. The appointment of Ernst & Young was based on the recommendation of the audit committee, which conducted a comprehensive review of alternatives regarding the firm that
would conduct our independent audit. The decision to change auditors did not reflect any adverse position towards PricewaterhouseCoopers service to the Company. The appointment of Ernst & Young reflected that firms extensive
experience in servicing companies similar to Global-Tech and the depth of resources that are available primarily in Hong Kong to service our account. Ernst & Young was reappointed as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2006.



37



---

##### Table of Contents

During fiscal 2006, the audit committee had one meeting with the independent auditors, Ernst &
Young. In July 2006, the audit committee had a meeting with Ernst & Young as well as the Companys financial executives to discuss the scope of the fiscal 2006 audit.

Compensation committee. Our Board of Directors also has a compensation committee. The compensation committee reviews and determines
compensation for officers, directors and consultants, as well as bonuses and other incentive programs for employees. As of March 31, 2006, the compensation committee was comprised of Patrick Po-On Hui and Brian Yuen. Mr. Brian Yuen is
considered not to be independent since he is also a member of management of the Company.

We do not have, and none of our subsidiaries
have, service contracts with any of our directors providing benefits upon termination of employment. We do have employment agreements with Kwong Ho Sham and John C.K. Sham that provide for substantially the same severance benefits in certain
circumstances. If either Kwong Ho Sham or John Sham resign as a result of certain material changes relating to their employment, the agreements entitle them to a lump sum payment equal to the aggregate amount of salary and performance bonus that
would have been payable to them through the end of the term of their agreements, continued receipt of other benefits under the agreements for the remainder of the term of their agreements and immediate vesting of their outstanding equity awards. The
agreements also generally entitle Messrs. Sham and Sham to the same severance benefits if either terminates their employment, or their employment is terminated by their employer, as a result of a change in control of Global-Tech. If a liquidation
plan for Global-Tech is approved by a court or agency of pertinent jurisdiction, Messrs. Sham and Sham also are entitled to a lump sum payment equal to the aggregate amount of salary and performance bonus that would have been payable to them through
the end of the term of their agreements.



|D. | Employees.
|-- | ----------

At March 31,
2004, 2005 and 2006, we employed 2,660, 3,057 and 2,383 persons, respectively, on a full-time basis. Of our employees at March 31, 2006, 86 were located in Hong Kong, 2,294 in China and 3 in Macau. A breakdown of persons employed by main
category of activity is as follows:



|                               |  |      
|------------------------------ |  | -----
|Category                       |  | No.  
|Manufacturing                  |  | 1,845
|Production management          |  | 28   
|Finance and administration     |  | 185  
|Receiving and warehousing      |  | 100  
|Quality control                |  | 100  
|Production engineering         |  | 38   
|Product design and development |  | 45   
|Sales and marketing            |  | 34   
|Human resources                |  | 8    
|                               |  |      
|                               |  | 2,383
|                               |  |      

Since our production levels fluctuate, the number of employees varies from time to time based on
our production requirements. During peak production periods in fiscal 2006, we employed a maximum of approximately 3,500 people in our Dongguan factory. Our manufacturing personnel are paid a monthly salary and periodic incentive bonuses and are
provided with housing, medical care and subsidized meals in our dormitory complex adjacent to each factory. We have not experienced any significant labor stoppages and we believe that relations with our employees are satisfactory.

Our relationships with our employees in China are subject to the Labor Law of the Peoples Republic of China which went into effect on
January 1, 1995. The Labor Law regulates, among other things, the number of hours employees may work on a daily and weekly basis, provides allowances for legal holidays, regulates working conditions such as safety and hygiene and provides for
various social welfare and employment benefits. We believe that we are in compliance with such regulations. Availability of labor in the future may have a negative impact on our results of operations since demand in Guangdong Province for unskilled
manufacturing labor currently exceeds supply.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

|E. | Share ownership.
|-- | ----------------

The
following table sets forth information regarding the share ownership in Global-Tech as of April 1, 2006 held by the directors and senior management and options granted to them on our common shares:



|                                                     |  |                  |  |             |  
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ----------- | -
|Name of Owner(1)                                     |  | Number of Shares |  | Percentage# |  
|Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited(2)               |  | 7,555,189        |  | 61.8        | %
|Kwong Ho Sham(3)                                     |  | 7,555,189        |  | 61.8        |  
|John C.K. Sham(4)                                    |  | 8,332,394        |  | 68.2        |  
|Brian Yuen(5)                                        |  | 338,834          |  | 2.8         |  
|Barry J. Buttifant(6)                                |  | 11,000           |  | *           |  
|Patrick Po-On Hui(6)                                 |  | 18,218           |  | *           |  
|Ken Ying-Keung Wong(6)                               |  | 12,000           |  | *           |  
|Kin Shek Leung(6)                                    |  | 8,550            |  | *           |  
|Norris Lo Yan Lam (6)                                |  | 10,000           |  | *           |  
|All officers and directors as a group (8 persons)(7) |  | 8,730,996        |  | 71.4        |  

---

|# | In accordance with SEC rules, each beneficial owners holdings have been calculated assuming full exercise of outstanding options covering our common shares, if any,
exercisable by such owner within 60 days after April 1, 2006, but no exercise of options covering our common shares held by any other person.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|* | Less than 1%
|- | ------------



|(1) | Unless otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table above have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all common shares beneficially owned by them.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Based on a schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2006, Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited owns 7,555,189 of the issued and outstanding common shares. The share
ownership of Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited is held 60% by Kwong Ho Sham and 40% by John Sham. Voting control of Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited is held approximately 42.9% by Kwong Ho Sham and 57.1% by John Sham. Each of Kwong Ho Sham and
John Sham disclaim any beneficial ownership in any of the common shares of Global-Tech owned by Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Includes 7,555,189 shares owned by Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Includes 7,555,189 shares owned by Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited and 400,000 common shares issuable to John C.K. Sham within 60 days after April 1, 2006 upon exercise of
options granted under our 1997 and 2005 stock option plans. In September 2005, Mr. John C.K. Sham voluntarily agreed to the cancellation of options previously granted to him by the Company in the amount of 136,628 common shares.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | Includes 286,628 common shares issuable to Brian Yuen within 60 days after April 1, 2006 upon exercise of options granted under our 1997 and 2005 stock option plans. Excludes
7,900 shares owned by the wife and son of Mr. Yuen who decline any beneficial ownership in such shares. In September 2005, Mr. Yuen voluntarily agreed to the cancellation of options previously granted to him by the Company in the amount of
140,607 common shares.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | Each of Barry J. Buttifant, Patrick Po-On Hui, Ken Ying-Keung Wong, Norris Lo Yan Lam and Kin Shek Leung own less than 1% of the issued and outstanding common shares as of
April 1, 2006.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(7) | Includes 7,555,189 common shares owned by Wing Shing Holdings Company and 741,396 common shares beneficially owned by or issuable to various officers and directors within 60 days
after April 1, 2006 upon exercise of options granted under our 1997 and 2005 stock option plans. In September 2005, each of Mr. John C.K. Sham and Mr. Yuen voluntarily agreed to the cancellation of options previously granted to each
of them by the Company in the amount of 136,628 and 140,607 common shares, respectively.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our directors and
senior management do not have different voting rights.



39



---

##### Table of Contents

1997 stock option plan. Our 1997 stock option plan was adopted by our Board of Directors in
September 1997. The plan provides for the grant of:



| |  |  | options that are intended to qualify as incentive stock options, or ISOs, within the meaning of Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to employees, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | options not intended to qualify as ISOs to employees and consultants.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

The plan is administered by the Board of Directors, or a committee of directors appointed by the Board, which determines



| |  |  | the terms of options, including the exercise price,
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the number of common shares subject to the option, and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the terms and conditions of exercise.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------

No option granted under the plan
is transferable by the optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and each option is exercisable during the lifetime of the optionee only by such optionee. The exercise price of all ISOs granted under the plan must be at
least equal to the fair market value of such common shares on the date of grant. With respect to any participant who owns (or is deemed to own) stock possessing more than 10% of the voting rights of our outstanding capital stock, the exercise price
of any ISO must be not less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant. The term of each option granted under the plan may be established by the Board of Directors, or a committee of the board, in its sole discretion; provided, however,
that the maximum term of each ISO granted under the plan is 10 years. With respect to any ISO granted to a participant who owns (or is deemed to own) stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our outstanding
capital stock, the maximum term is 5 years.

The total number of common shares available for options under the plan is 1.6 million
shares. We have granted options to purchase on the dates, in the amounts and at the prices indicated below:



| |  |  | In September 1997, 322,000 common shares to employees and a consultant with an exercise price of $14.50 per share;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In March 1998, 268,800 common shares to employees and consultants with an exercise price of $19.00 per share;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In August 1998, 250,000 common shares to two directors with an exercise price of $8.31 per share;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In April, May and December 1998, 33,000 common shares to two officers, employees and a consultant with an exercise price of $19.00 per share;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In April 1999, 50,000 common shares to a consultant, with 15,000 common shares with an exercise price of $4.75 per share and 35,000 common shares with an exercise price per share
equal to the prevailing market price at the time of vesting;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In October 1999, 50,000 common shares to an officer with an exercise price of $5.00 per share;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In March 2000, 208,100 common shares to directors, employees and a consultant with an exercise prices ranging from $5.00 to $19.00 per share;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In October 2000, 2,500 common shares to a consultant with an exercise price of $5.75 per share;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In April 2000 and March 2001, 12,700 common shares to ten employees with an exercise price of $6.25 per share;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In May 2001, 300,000 common shares to three directors with an exercise price of $4.75 per share;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In June 2001, 12,000 common shares to one new director with an exercise price of $6.25 per share;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In November 2002, 9,400 common shares to an officer and employees with an exercise price of $4.55 per share;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



40



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | In November 2003, 12,000 common shares to one new director with an exercise price of $7.60 per share;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In December 2003, 240,000 to three directors, 15,000 to two officers and 94,000 to employees all at an exercise price of $7.64 per share, and 20,000 to an officer at an exercise
price to equal the fair market value on the four anniversaries of date of hire; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In March 2006, 216,030 common shares to four directors, 100,000 shares to a consultant and 180,000 shares to employees all at an exercise price of $3.90 per share.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The options vest over varying periods of up to 5 years except for the December 2003 grants which are performance related and are all
exercisable for a period of 10 years from the date of grant.

On May 10, 2000, due to our stock price being significantly below the
option exercise prices and the corresponding lack of incentive that the options were intended to provide, our Board of Directors authorized a voluntary exchange program for holders of options with an exercise price greater than $6.25. This exchange
program allowed holders to surrender their original options for cancellation by us in return for a reduced number of options with an exercise price of $6.25 providing for a similar aggregate value as calculated under the Black-Scholes method. Under
the offer, all other terms of the original options, including expiration and vesting dates, remained unchanged. As a result of this exchange program, 914,100 old options were cancelled and 711,175 new options were granted on exchange.

During fiscal 2005, an aggregate of 36,000 shares with an exercise price of $6.25 per share were forfeited upon the resignation of the participants.

During fiscal 2006, a total number of 347,538 shares with an exercise price of $6.25 granted to two directors and a consultant were
voluntarily cancelled. 21,500 shares with an exercise price ranging from $6.25 to $7.64 were forfeited upon the resignation of the relevant participants, and 2,500 shares with an exercise price of $5.75 expired.

2005 stock option plan. Our 2005 stock option plan was adopted by our Board of Directors in October 2005. The plan provides for the grant
of:



| |  |  | options that are intended to qualify as incentive stock options, or ISOs, within the meaning of Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to employees, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | options not intended to qualify as ISOs to employees and consultants.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

The plan is administered by the Board of Directors, or a committee of outside directors appointed by the Board, which determines



| |  |  | the terms of options, including the exercise price,
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the number of common shares subject to the option, and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the terms and conditions of exercise.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------

No option granted
under the plan is transferable by the optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and each option is exercisable during the lifetime of the optionee only by such optionee. The exercise price of all ISOs granted under the plan
must be at least equal to the fair market value of such common shares on the date of grant. With respect to any participant who owns (or is deemed to own) stock possessing more than 10% of the voting rights of our outstanding capital stock, the
exercise price of any ISO must be not less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant. The term of each option granted under the plan may be established by the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board, in its sole discretion;
provided, however, that the maximum term of each ISO granted under the plan is 10 years. With respect to any ISO granted to a participant who owns (or is deemed to own) stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes
of our outstanding capital stock, the maximum term is 5 years.

The total number of common shares available for options under the plan is
1.8 million shares. We have granted options to purchase on the dates, in the amounts and at the prices indicated below:



| |  |  | In March 2006, 313,970 shares were granted to two directors with an exercise price of $3.90.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



41



---

##### Table of Contents

1999 employee stock purchase plan. Our 1999 employee stock purchase plan was adopted by our
Board of Directors in January 1999. The plan was approved by our stockholders at our annual meeting of stockholders in March 1999. The total number of common shares which may be granted under the plan is 180,000 common shares. Stock grants may be
awarded under the plan to our employees, including officers and directors, and our non-employee directors and consultants in consideration for their service to us. As of March 31, 2006, we have granted, in the aggregate, net of forfeiture,
60,753 common shares under the plan.

The plan is administered by our Board of Directors, or a committee of the board, which determines:



| |  |  | the participants to be awarded stock grants,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the number of shares subject to each stock grant, or the formula pursuant to which such number will be determined,
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the date of award and the vesting, and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | expiration terms applicable to each stock grant.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------

The
award of stock grants may, but need not, be conditioned on the participant electing to forego his or her right to all or any part of his or her cash salary or cash bonus. Our Board of Directors may provide that the common shares issued upon receipt
of any stock grant shall be subject to such further conditions, restrictions or agreements as they in their discretion may specify prior to the receipt of such stock grant, including without limitation, deferrals on issuance, conditions on vesting
or transferability and forfeiture or repurchase provisions. Our Board of Directors may establish rules for the deferred delivery of common shares upon receipt of a stock grant.

Lite Array stock option plan.In conjunction with the acquisition of Lite Array on May 31, 2001, our subsidiary, Global Lite
Array, established a stock option plan on the date of acquisition. The shares issued under this plan are based on the shares of a subsidiary Global Lite Array and not of the Company. Under this plan, the following options were outstanding as of
March 31, 2006.



| |  |  | 800,000 options at an exercise price of $0.34 per share issued to four directors. These options were fully vested on May 31, 2004 and will expire on May 31, 2011.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 30,000 options at exercise prices ranging from $0.20 to $1.50 per share issued to an employee. These options will expire during the period on May 31, 2006.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 20,000 options at an exercise price of $0.34 per share issued to an employee. These options will expire on November 12, 2012.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Item 7. | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions.
|------- | --------------------------------------------------



|A. | Major shareholders.
|-- | -------------------

The
following table sets forth information regarding the share ownership in Global-Tech as of April 1, 2006 of shareholders that are beneficial owners of 5% or more of our outstanding common shares:



|                                       |  |                  |  |            |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ---------- | -
|Name of Owner                          |  | Number of Shares |  | Percentage |  
|Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited(1) |  | 7,555,189        |  | 61.8       | %
|Heartland Advisors, Inc.(2)            |  | 1,181,200        |  | 9.7        |  
|Porter Felleman Inc.(3)                |  | 651,700          |  | 5.3        |  

---

|(1) | Based on a schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2006 Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited owns 7,555,189 of the issued and outstanding common shares. The share
ownership of Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited is held 60.0% by Kwong Ho Sham and 40.0% by John Sham. Voting control of Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited is held approximately 42.9% by Kwong Ho Sham and 57.1% by John Sham. Each of Kwong Ho Sham
and John Sham disclaim any beneficial ownership in any of the common shares of Global-Tech owned by Wing Shing Holdings Company Limited.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 3, 2006, Heartland Advisors, Inc. reported share voting and dispositive power over 1,181,200 common shares. As provided
in its Schedule 13G/A filed September 8, 2006, Heartland Advisors reported share voting and dispositive power over 598,400 shares common shares.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Based on a Form 13F-HR filed with the SEC on February 15, 2005, Porter Felleman Inc. reported sole voting authority over 618,200 common shares and shared voting authority over
33,500 common shares.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



42



---

##### Table of Contents

Our major shareholders have the same voting rights as all holders of our common stock.

As of August 31, 2006, approximately 33.5%, or 4,322,614 of our outstanding common shares were held in the United States by 8 holders registered on
the books of our transfer agent.

To the best of our knowledge, and other than as disclosed in this annual report, we are not directly or
indirectly controlled or owned by any other corporation, foreign government or any other natural or legal person, and we are not subject to any arrangements the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of
Global-Tech.

B.Related party transactions.

Lease and Car Rental Agreements with Related Companies:



| |  |  | On December 1, 2004, we entered into an amendment of a lease agreement with Wing Shing Products Company Limited, a company owned by the Sham family. The amendment included
leasing approximately 14,680 square feet of the 25,690 square feet of space previously leased for our former executive offices and warehouse. Under the amended lease, we pay annual rent of approximately $102,000, which is at fair market value. The
amended lease was effective from December 1, 2004 and expired on March 31, 2006, but was renewed on May 15, 2006, effective from April 1, 2006 for a further two years.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On December 1, 2004, we entered into an amendment of a lease agreement with Kenmore Assets Limited, a company owned by an officer and director, for an executive apartment in
Hong Kong at a monthly rate of approximately $5,100. The rent is at fair market for such a property, which is used to accommodate business visitors from overseas. The amended lease was effective from December 1, 2004 and expired on
March 31, 2006. The lease agreement was renewed at the same rate on April 1, 2006. The lease can be terminated by either party by giving one-months notice.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | We rent two company cars from Wing Shing Fat Investment Limited and one from Wing Shing Products Co. Ltd. Both companies are owned by the Sham family. Monthly rentals for the three
vehicles are approximately $3,500, which is the estimated fair value of rental or lease rates in Hong Kong for such vehicles.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On June 15, 2003, we entered into a lease for office space located on the 12thfloor, Kin Teck Industrial Building, Aberdeen, from Wing Shing Products Company Limited effective from April 1, 2003 which expired on March 31, 2006. The lease was subsequently renewed on
May 15, 2006. The total office space is approximately 7,400 square feet. We leased this office for the product development group of our display business but subsequently relocated our administrative group into this space. Annual rent for this
space is approximately $51,000, which is at fair market value.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Effective from April 1, 2005, we entered into a 12-month lease for office space located on the 13thfloor, Kin Teck Industrial Building, Aberdeen, from Wing Shing Products Company Limited. The total office space is approximately 3,670 square feet. We leased
this office for the product development group for our core business. Annual rent for this space is approximately $20,000, which is at fair market value. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2006, we vacated this space.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We believe the leases were on terms no less favorable than could have been received from unaffiliated third parties.

Loan to Spouse of an Executive Employee

In October 1998, we provided an unsecured loan of $1.0 million to a U.S. corporation wholly owned by the spouse of an executive employee of ours. The loan bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 7.0% and is repayable
in quarterly installments of approximately $81,000 commencing October 28, 2003, with any remaining balance due in full on October 28, 2008. The net balance of the loan plus accrued interest was approximately $1.4 million and $1.5 million,
respectively, as of March 31, 2003 and 2004. We provided a reserve of approximately $832,000 and approximately $978,000, respectively, against the loan and the related interest



43



---

##### Table of Contents

receivable as of March 31, 2003 and 2004. The net amount of the loan was included in promissory note and interest receivable on our consolidated balance
sheet. Effective April 30, 2004, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of this U.S. corporation for $1,000. There was no gain or loss recorded by us as a result of this acquisition since the only assets acquired were cash, short-term
investments and subscription receivable and the promissory note and interest receivable were carried at the same value as the cash balance.

Loan to a
Director

In October 1999, we made a loan to a director for the purchase of a residence. The loan was in the original principal amount
of $460,000, bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.02%, and was secured by a mortgage on the property. The loan was payable in six years with annual installments of approximately $77,000 of principal together with interest on the unpaid
principal balance, commencing October 21, 2000. Such loan payments were forgiven in arrears, however, on each payment due date in consideration for the directors continued service to us. The loan was satisfied in full in fiscal 2006.

Our Policy Concerning Certain Transactions

All transactions with our executive officers and directors must be approved by a majority of our directors who are neither our officers nor employees.



|C. | Interests of experts and counsel.
|-- | ---------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 8. | Financial Information.
|------- | ----------------------



|A. | Consolidated statements and other financial information.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------

Our consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2004 have been audited by an independent auditor in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in the United States of America, whereas fiscal 2005 and 2006
have been audited by the same independent auditor in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A consolidated balance sheet is presented for each of fiscal 2005 and 2006 along with a consolidated
statement of operations, statement of cash flow and statement of changes in shareholders equity which are presented for each of fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006. See Item 18Financial Statements for detailed financial information.

Percentage of Export Sales

Export
sales constitute all of our total sales volume. For a breakdown of our export sales by market during the past three fiscal years, see Note 25(a) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We did not conduct any activities nor make any sales in
any regions or countries subject to U.S. economic sanctions.

Legal Proceedings

Except as set forth below, Global-Tech and its subsidiaries are not a party in any material litigation or arbitration, and know of no material litigation,
arbitration or claim threatened against them or their properties.

Certain agreements with ODM customers include an indemnification
provision whereby the respective subsidiary undertakes to hold harmless and indemnify the respective customer from all suits that may be brought against the customer for infringement of any patent or registered design in connection with the sale of
the products purchased from the subsidiary.

SEB v. Sunbeam v. Pentalpha Enterprises

On March 10, 1998, SEB, S.A. filed a patent infringement suit against Sunbeam Corporation and Sunbeam Products, Inc. (collectively
Sunbeam) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. SEB later amended its complaint to add Global-Tech and one of its subsidiaries, Pentalpha Enterprises, as additional defendants in the case. SEB alleged that the
defendants infringed a patent issued to SEB concerning a deep fryer model. SEB sought to recover unspecified monetary damages. In addition, Sunbeam asserted a third-party claim and a cross-claim against Global-Tech and our subsidiary for breach of
an alleged obligation to indemnify Sunbeam from SEBs patent infringement claims. Global-Tech and its subsidiary moved to dismiss the complaint of SEB for lack of personal jurisdiction. By order dated July 16, 1999, the District Court
granted the motion and dismissed the complaint against Global-Tech and its subsidiary. Sunbeam then paid SEB $2 million to settle its claim. Sunbeams third-party complaint against Global-Tech and its subsidiary remained.



44



---

##### Table of Contents

On December 15, 1999, our subsidiary asserted counterclaims against Sunbeam in connection with a
product supply agreement. In July 2002, after the case had been transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Sunbeam moved for summary judgment on all claims. By memorandum decision dated February 19,
2003, the District Court granted Sunbeams motion insofar as it related to the claim of our subsidiary for fraud in the inducement of the product supply agreement, but denied the motion with respect to the claims of our subsidiary for breach of
contract. In addition, the District Court granted Sunbeams motion for summary judgment on its claims for indemnity against our subsidiary as to liability, but ruled that a trial was necessary to determine the amount of damages that Sunbeam was
entitled to recover on its indemnity claim in addition to the $2 million Sunbeam previously paid to settle SEBs claims of patent infringement.

The trial on Sunbeams claims for indemnity and the claim of our subsidiary for breach of contract began on January 12, 2004. On January 16, 2004, the Jury returned a verdict in favor of
(i) Sunbeam on its claim for indemnity and awarded Sunbeam approximately $2,450,949 against Global-Tech and its subsidiary, and (ii) in favor of our subsidiary on its claim for breach of contract and awarded our subsidiary $6,600,000. The
District Court entered a final judgment on February 11, 2004 to add prejudgment interest to the Jurys award, awarding Sunbeam approximately $3,430,694 and our subsidiary approximately $6,632,910. Our subsidiary filed a motion to
reconsider the calculation of prejudgment interest, which the Court denied. Sunbeam moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Sunbeam argued, among other things, that our subsidiary should be denied any recovery and,
alternatively, that any recovery by our subsidiary should be limited to $1,000,000. The District Court denied these motions by an order entered April 12, 2004. Sunbeam appealed on May 10, 2004. Global-Tech and its subsidiary cross-appealed
on May 21, 2004. The United States Court of Appeals for the 11thCircuit heard oral argument on the appeal on
March 1, 2005.

By decision dated August 12, 2005, the Court of Appeals for the 11thCircuit affirmed the judgment in so far as Sunbeam appealed from it and affirmed the judgment in so far as Global-Tech and its subsidiary appealed from it,
except that the Court reversed the district courts calculation of prejudgment interest and remanded for a recalculation of our subsidiarys prejudgment interest from June 30, 2001. The mandate of the Court of Appeals was issued on
September 12, 2005. The time for Sunbeam to petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court has expired.

Our subsidiary
moved in the District Court for an amended judgment to fix the amount of interest to which it is entitled. Sunbeam opposed the motion on the grounds that our subsidiary has not properly calculated the interest to which it is entitled. By amended
judgment dated December 12, 2005, the District Court awarded Pentalpha prejudgment interest from June 30, 2001 to February 11, 2004, bringing the judgment entered in favor of Pentalpha as of February 11, 2004 to $8,007,849 and
leaving unchanged the judgment entered against Pentalpha in favor of Sunbeam.

On December 23, 2005, Pentalpha filed a notice of
appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Pentalpha filed its brief on January 25, 2006, arguing that the district erred in failing to award it prejudgment interest until the final amended judgment in December 12, 2005.
The appeal has been fully briefed and is scheduled for oral argument in the Court of Appeals on November 15, 2006.

Sunbeam has posted
a bond in the amount of $5,163,076, which is attached pursuant to the September 7, 2005 order of the district court in the action SEB S.A., v. Montgomery Ward et al., pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York, and further described below.

SEB v. Montgomery Ward

After dismissal of the action in the District Court in New Jersey, SEB commenced an action on August 28, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Global-Tech, one of its
subsidiaries and Montgomery Ward, then a customer, for infringement of SEBs patent relating to a deep fryer model. On December 15, 1999, the District Court entered a preliminary injunction against the sale of the deep fryer that was the
subject of the case. This was affirmed on appeal. On August 3, 2000, SEB moved for a further preliminary injunction and a citation for contempt against our subsidiary based upon the sale of a modified deep fryer product by our subsidiary. While
that motion was pending, Montgomery Ward filed for bankruptcy protection. That filing stayed the action as against Montgomery Ward. On March 20, 2001, the District Court found that the modified deep fryer infringed the patent under the doctrine
of equivalents. However, the District Court denied SEBs application for a contempt citation. SEB then moved to amend its complaint to add certain of our other subsidiaries and John C.K. Sham as additional defendants. The District Court, in an
opinion dated September 30, 2002, denied SEBs motion to amend to add additional defendants and denied the



45



---

##### Table of Contents

motion of Global-Tech to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Global-Tech and its subsidiary moved on December 3, 2002, for summary judgment on
liability on the grounds that neither engaged in any conduct that infringed the patent because of the extraterritoriality of their acts and for summary judgment on the claim of SEB for lost profits. The District Court heard oral argument on this
motion on March 24, 2004.

SEB has also moved for an order attaching the judgment in favor of our subsidiary in the action SEB v.
Sunbeam v. Pentalpha Enterprises. The parties resolved the motion by consenting to an order that requires us and our subsidiary, among other things, to give notice to SEB of any attempt to collect the judgment against Sunbeam. On August 19,
2005, our subsidiary notified SEB that it anticipated taking action to enforce the judgment against Sunbeam from the District Court for the Southern District of Florida. On August 24, 2005, SEB served a renewed motion to attach the entire
proceeds of the judgment. The Court attached the entire judgment by order dated September 7, 2005. Our subsidiary filed a motion on September 22, 2005 to reduce the amount of the attachment to no more than $500,000. SEB has opposed the
motion of our subsidiary. The District Court heard oral arguments on November 8, 2005, but denied our motion to reduce the amount of the attachment.

By decision and memorandum dated January 5, 2006, the District Court denied our motion for summary judgment.

The District Court conducted a trial beginning on April 17, 2006. On April 21, 2006, the jury returned a verdict finding that the Company and its subsidiary has infringed the SEB patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271
(a) and (b), with respect to both the original deep fryer and the modified deep fryer, that the infringement with respect to both deep fryers were willful and that SEB was entitled to a reasonable royalty in the total amount of $4,650,000,
representing $3,600,000 for its sales to Sunbeam, $540,000 for sales to Fingerhut and $510,000 for sales to Montgomery Ward.

Both sides
have made post-trial motions. Our company has moved for judgment as a matter of law on a wide range of issues and for a new trial. SEB has moved to enhance damages with the addition of treble damages, prejudgment interest and attorneys fees.
The motions have not been fully briefed and are scheduled for oral argument on September 27, 2006. The conference was adjourned on September 26, 2006 until further notice from the District Court. The outcome of the post-trial motions is
uncertain and the District Court has not yet entered any judgment based upon the jury verdict. Accordingly, the amount of the judgment, as well as the timing of its entry are uncertain.

We have accrued for a loss contingency in respect of this litigation in our consolidated balance sheet as at March 31, 2006 in an amount of
$4,650,000. An adverse decision in the above action relating to prejudgment interest or treble damages would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Sunbeam v. Wing Shing Products

On February 23,
2001, Sunbeam commenced an adversary proceeding against our subsidiary, Wing Shing Products, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York asserting that Sunbeam owned U.S. Patent No. Des. 348,585 or had a permanent license
to use it. On March 12, 2001, the subsidiary asserted a counterclaim against Sunbeam for infringement of the Design Patent.

The
parties concluded a bench trial in the Bankruptcy Court on January 31, 2002. By decision dated June 3, 2003, the Court ruled against Sunbeam on its claims for a declaratory judgment and in favor of our subsidiary on its claims for design
patent infringement. The Court further ruled that our subsidiary was entitled to recover Sunbeams profits from the sale of infringing coffeemakers only for the time period after February 9, 2001. In addition, on June 17, 2003, the
Court entered an injunction restraining Sunbeam from further infringing the design patent. The Bankruptcy Court entered a final judgment in favor of our subsidiary on March 15, 2004, in the amount of $2,304,403.

Sunbeam and our subsidiary appealed the June 3, 2003 decision of the Bankruptcy Court to the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of New
York. By memorandum opinion and order entered June 30, 2004, the district court affirmed in part the June 3, 2004 decision of the Bankruptcy Court. It reversed one finding of the Bankruptcy Court and held that the subsidiary, in 1992,
breached a contract to negotiate with Sunbeam concerning ownership of certain patent rights. However, because the District Court affirmed the holding of the Bankruptcy Court that the statute of limitations had expired on any claim of Sunbeam for
that breach, the reversal by the District Court did not affect the $2,304,403 judgment entered in favor of our subsidiary by the Bankruptcy Court.

Both Sunbeam and our subsidiary appealed to the United States Court of Appeals from the judgment of the District Court in the action.



46



---

##### Table of Contents

On August 24, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the
$2,304,403 judgment that the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York had entered on March 15, 2004, in favor of Global-Techs subsidiary, Wing Shing Products (BVI) Ltd., against Sunbeam Products, Inc. The Court
of Appeals cased its mandate on September 14, 2005 for Sunbeam to file a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.

On January 9, 2006, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition of Sunbeam for a writ of certiorari. On or about January 12, 2006, Sunbeam wire transferred $2,353,581 to our subsidiary. Our subsidiary provided a
satisfaction of judgment to Sunbeam and released the bond that Sunbeam had previously posted to secure the judgment. This matter has therefore been concluded.

Wing Shing Products v. Simatelex

On February 9, 2001, Wing Shing Products, our subsidiary commenced an action in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Simatelex Manufactory Corp. claiming infringement of U.S. Patent No. Des. 348,585. The Bankruptcy Court stayed this action by order dated February 26, 2001. The U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York reinstated the stay of the action originally ordered by the Bankruptcy Court by order dated February 24, 2004, based upon Sunbeams appeal from the June 3, 2003 memorandum decision.
By order dated June 30, 2004, the District Court lifted the stay and directed the attorneys for the parties to appear at a conference on July 23, 2004. The District Court at that time directed the parties to conclude discovery by the end
of 2004.Discovery has been substantially competed. Simatelex then moved for summary judgment on the ground that it is not subject to the personal jurisdiction of the New York court and that it did not infringe the design patent because its
acts occurred in Asia. Our subsidiary has moved for summary judgment on the ground that Simatelex has infringed the design patent. The District Court again stayed the action by order dated April 18, 2005, pending the resolution of the decision
of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the action Sunbeam v. Wing Shing.

Given the August 24, 2005 decision of the Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the District Court by order dated September 14, 2005, lifted the stay and directed that discovery be completed by November 1, 2005.

On November 7, 2005, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of liability for design patent infringement. The district
court has not yet acted on those motions but has scheduled oral argument for October 24, 2006. If the District Court does not grant the anticipated motion of Simatelex for summary judgment, a trial will be required.

Wing Shing Products v. Sunbeam Products and Simatelex

On May 9, 2006, our subsidiary filed an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Sunbeam Products, Inc. and Simatelex Manufactory Co. Ltd. for infringement of United States Patent Des.
No. 348,585 based on sales of their coffeemakers designated as the AR Series and the Mr. Coffee Commercial. Defendants have responded to the complaint and counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment that the patent is invalid.

The Court has entered a scheduling order directing the completion of discovery by March 15, 2007.

Best Hero Limited v. Pentalpha Hong Kong Ltd.

On
October 11, 2004, Best Hero Limited (Best Hero) issued a Writ in the Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong against our subsidiary Pentalpha Hong Kong Limited (Pentalpha) for payment of $4,250,400. The
claim relates to two purchase orders issued by Pentalpha on May 31, 2004 and June 1, 2004, respectively, to Best Hero for the purchase of LCD TV panels at a total purchase price of $4,620,000. However, the quality of the initial shipment
of LCD panels which were paid for was determined to be unacceptable. Accordingly, further delivery of the remaining orders was refused. Best Hero alleged that our subsidiary has repudiated the contract and instituted the present legal proceedings to
claim for damages. We intend to defend the action on the grounds that we were justified in rejecting the goods for breach of conditions as to description and sample on the part of Best Hero. A Defence and Counterclaim was filed by Pentalpha in the
High Court on December 28, 2004. Best Hero filed a Reply and Defence to the Counterclaim on January 11, 2005. The discovery of documents in this action has been completed and the parties are now in the course of preparing their respective
witness statements.

We have obtained an opinion from legal counsel representing us on the possible outcome of this litigation. Having
considered that the parties have not yet exchanged witness statements, our legal counsel has estimated the maximum liability would be:



47



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | The deficiency in price between the contractual price and the price which the LCD TV panels were actually sold by Best Hero (this is still unknown by us) together with the interest
and any costs incurred but not limited to legal fees.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | If Best Hero has not sold any of the subject panels, the maximum compensation will be the full contractual price together with interest and legal costs but we would receive the LCD
TV panels which would then be subject to net realizable value assessment.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We have accrued for a loss contingency in respect
of this litigation in our consolidated balance sheet as at March 31, 2006 in an amount which is less than the claim against us but represents our best estimate of the most likely outcome resulting from this litigation.

Global Display Limited v. Mico Electric (Hong Kong) Limited

On September 9, 2005, Global Display Limited (Global Display) issued a Writ in the Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong against Mico Electric (Hong Kong) Limited (Mico) for payment of $540,000.
The claim relates to a purchase contract entered into between the parties on or about November 2004 (the Contract) under which Mico agreed to purchase from Global Display 1,500 LCD TVs at a total purchase price of $540,000. Mico refused
to accept delivery of the said 1,500 pieces and alleged that the LCD TVs did not comply with their requirements. It is the position of Global Display that Micos refusal to accept delivery of the said LCD TVs constitutes a breach of the
Contract and after taking legal advice, Global Display instituted the present legal proceedings to claim against Mico for the purchase price and/or damages under the Contract. Mico has filed an Acknowledgment of Service to contest the proceedings
and is required to file a Defence within the prescribed time limit.

An adverse decision in any of these legal proceedings could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Included in accrued expenses in our
consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 were provision for legal fees of approximately $285,000, $98,000, $230,000, $190,000 and $144,000 in relation to certain of the above cases. Unless noted above, we have
not included in our financial statements any asset or liability resulting from litigation that has not resulted in a cash deposit into or payment from bank accounts of Global-Tech or its subsidiaries.

Dividends

We are a holding company and have no
business operations other than ownership of our subsidiaries. In the event that we should decide to pay cash dividends, as a holding company, our ability to pay dividends and meet other obligations would depend upon the receipt of dividends or other
payments from our operating subsidiaries and our other holdings and investments. In addition, our operating subsidiaries from time to time may be subject to restrictions on their ability to make distributions to us as a result of restrictive
covenants in loan agreements, restrictions on the conversion of local currency into U.S. dollars or other hard currency and other regulatory restrictions. Restrictions on currency conversion may be in effect from time to time but have not had a
material effect on us in the past.



|B. | Significant changes.
|-- | --------------------

There have been no significant changes since the date of the financial statements included in this annual report except as set out below:



|(1) | On April 2006 a subsidiary of the Company executed a joint venture agreement with Anwell Technologies Limited (Anwell) to explore synergies related to the production of
OLED systems. The share capital of the subsidiary was established at $8 million being the value attributed to the total assets related to our OLED clean room and equipment, know-how and development program. We sold 70% of the subsidiary to Anwell in
exchange for a $5.6 million convertible note. Our contribution to the venture amounted to approximately $2.0 million, which equaled the net book value of tangible assets transferred to the venture.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | In the first quarter of fiscal 2007 the Company reduced its Hong Kong staff by 28 people and incurred a cost of $500,000 in severance. Annualized savings of $1 million are
anticipated from this headcount reduction.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



48



---

##### Table of Contents

|(3) | Global Appliance Holdings Limited entered into an agreement on August 1, 2006, to sell a 30% interest in Global Auto Limited (formerly known as Lite Array (OLED) H.K. Limited)
to an independent third party. Global Auto Limited intends to enter the car audio replacement market.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



49



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 9. The Offer and Listing.



|A. | Offer and listing details.
|-- | --------------------------

Our common shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol GAI on April 8, 1998. The following table lists the high and low market prices on the NYSE for the periods
indicated.



|                  |  |      |  |     
|----------------- |  | ---- |  | ----
|                  |  |     
|                  |  | High |  | Low 
|Fiscal 2002:      |  |      |  |     
|Annual            |  | 6.35 |  | 4.55
|                  |  |     
|Fiscal 2003:      |  |      |  |     
|First Quarter     |  | 5.00 |  | 4.60
|Second Quarter    |  | 4.93 |  | 4.15
|Third Quarter     |  | 4.77 |  | 3.87
|Fourth Quarter    |  | 5.20 |  | 4.43
|Annual            |  | 5.20 |  | 4.43
|                  |  |     
|Fiscal 2004:      |  |      |  |     
|First Quarter     |  | 5.90 |  | 4.50
|Second Quarter    |  | 8.45 |  | 5.00
|Third Quarter     |  | 9.59 |  | 6.90
|Fourth Quarter    |  | 9.90 |  | 8.00
|Annual            |  | 9.90 |  | 4.50
|                  |  |     
|Fiscal 2005:      |  |      |  |     
|First Quarter     |  | 9.75 |  | 7.59
|Second Quarter    |  | 9.83 |  | 8.15
|Third Quarter     |  | 9.40 |  | 7.16
|Fourth Quarter    |  | 8.95 |  | 6.73
|Annual            |  | 9.83 |  | 6.73
|                  |  |     
|Fiscal 2006:      |  |      |  |     
|First Quarter     |  | 7.20 |  | 4.85
|Second Quarter    |  | 6.24 |  | 4.72
|Third Quarter     |  | 5.13 |  | 3.53
|Fourth Quarter    |  | 4.75 |  | 3.64
|Annual            |  | 7.20 |  | 3.53
|                  |  |     
|Fiscal 2007:      |  |      |  |     
|First Quarter     |  | 4.00 |  | 3.17
|                  |  |     
|Six Month Period: |  |      |  |     
|August 2006       |  | 3.04 |  | 2.40
|July 2006         |  | 3.27 |  | 2.93
|June 2006         |  | 3.41 |  | 3.17
|May 2006          |  | 3.95 |  | 3.41
|April 2006        |  | 4.00 |  | 3.83
|March 2006        |  | 4.25 |  | 3.77



|B. | Plan of distribution.
|-- | ---------------------

Not applicable.



|C. | Markets.
|-- | --------

See Item 9.AThe Offer and ListingOffer and Listing Details above.



|D. | Selling shareholders.
|-- | ---------------------

Not applicable.



|E. | Dilution.
|-- | ---------

Not applicable.



|F. | Expenses of the issue.
|-- | ----------------------

Not applicable.



50



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 10. Additional Information.

The Companys corporate governance practices are governed by
applicable British Virgin Islands law, as well as by its Memorandum and Articles of Association. We have securities that are registered with the SEC and are listed on the NYSE, and are therefore subject to corporate governance requirements
applicable to the NYSE-listed non-U.S. companies. Many of the corporate governance rules in the NYSE Listed Company Manual do not apply to the company as a foreign private issuer, however, Rule 303A.11 requires us, as a non-U. S.
company, to disclose any significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by U.S. listed companies under these NYSE Listing Rules. We are a foreign private issuer and are permitted to follow home country
practice in lieu of the provisions of this Section 303A, except that we are required to comply with the requirements of Sections 303A.06, 303A.11 and 303A.12(b) and (c). To the extent applicable, we are endeavoring to comply with
Section 303A practices beyond those required.



|                              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |  |                                                                                              
|----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rules                         |  | Requirements                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  | CompanyCompliance                                                                            
|303A.01 Independent Directors |  | Listed companies must have a majority of independent directors                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |  | It is not mandatory for Global-Tech to comply with this provision.                           
|                              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|303A.02 Independent Tests     |  | (a)    The director has no material relationship with the listed company  (b)    NOT independent if:  (i)     The director is, or has
been within the last three years, an employee of the listed company, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer, of the listed company;  (ii)    The director has received, or
has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $100,000 in direct compensation from the listed company, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of
deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);  (iii)  (A) The director or an immediate family is a current partner of a firm that is the Companys internal or
external auditor; (B) the director is a current employee of such a firm; (C) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who participates in the firms audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not tax
planning) practice; or (D) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on the listed companys audit within that time; |  | Global-Tech considers whether its board members meet the requirements of being independent.



51



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rules                                                     |  | Requirements                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  | Company Compliance                                                                                                                                  
|                                                          |  | (iv)   The director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three
years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the listed companys present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that companys compensation committee; or  (v)    The director is a current
employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the listed company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds
the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other companys gross revenues. |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|                                                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|303A.03 Executive Sessions                                |  | To empower non-management directors to serve as a more effective check on management, the non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without
management.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  | Our non-management directors do not hold regularly scheduled sessions without management.                                                           
|                                                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|303A.04 Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee         |  | Listed companies must have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |  | It is not mandatory for Global-Tech to have a nominating and corporate governance committee.                                                        
|                                                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|303A.05 Compensation Committee                            |  | Listed companies must have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  | Mr. Brian Yuen, one member of Global-Techs compensation committee, is not considered independent since he is a member of management of the Company.
|                                                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|303A.06 Audit Committee                                   |  | Listed companies must have an audit committee that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |  | We have an audit committee comprised entirely of independent directors and otherwise comply with Rule 10A-3.                                        
|                                                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|303A.07 Audit Committee Additional Requirements           |  | (a)    The audit committee must have a minimum of three members;  (b)    All audit committee members must
satisfy the requirements for independence set out in Section 303A.02;  (c)    The audit committee must have a charter; and  (d)    Each listed company must have an internal audit function.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  | It is not mandatory for Global-Tech to comply with this provision.                                                                                  
|                                                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|303A.08 Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans |  | The NYSE Standards requires shareholder approval of all equity compensation plans and material revisions to such plan.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  | It is not mandatory for Global-Tech to comply with this provision.                                                                                  



52



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rules                                       |  | Requirements                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |  | Company Compliance                                                                                                                                                                              
|303A.09 Corporate Governance Guidelines     |  | Listed companies must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |  | It is not mandatoryfor Global-Tech tocomply with this provision.                                                                                                                                
|                                            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|303A.10 Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics |  | Listed companies must adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive
officers.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  | Global-Tech has adopteda code of ethicsthat applies to itsprincipal executiveofficer, principalfinancial officer,principalaccounting
officeror controller, orpersonsperforming similarfunctions.
|                                            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|303A.11 Foreign Private Issuer Disclosure   |  | Listed foreign private issuers must disclose any significant ways in which their corporate governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies under NYSE listing
standards                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  | As presented inthis document                                                                                                                                                                    
|                                            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|303A.12 Certification Requirements          |  | (a)    Each listed company Chief Executive Officer must certify to the NYSE each year
that he is not aware of any violation by the Company of NYSE corporate governance listing standards, qualifying the certification to the extent necessary.  (b)    Each listed company chief executive officer must notify the NYSE in writing after any executive
officer of the listed company becomes aware of any material non-compliance with any applicable provision of this Section 303A.  (c)    Each listed company must submit an executive Written Affirmation annually to the NYSE. In addition,
each listed company must submit an interim Written Affirmation each time a change occurs to the board or any of the committees subject to Section 303A. The annual and interim Written Affirmation must be in the form specified by the
NYSE. |  | On August 29,2005, we filedSection 303AForeign PrivateIssuer AnnualWrittenAffirmation withthe NYSE.                                                                                             



|A. | Share capital.
|-- | --------------

Not applicable.



|B. | Memorandum and articles of association.
|-- | ---------------------------------------

Objects and Purposes

Our objects and purposes are described in Clause 4 of our
memorandum and articles of association and generally allow us to engage in any act or activity that is not prohibited under British Virgin Islands law.

Directors

British Virgin Islands law and our articles of association provide that no agreement or transaction between us
and one or more of our directors or any entity in which any director has a financial interest or to which any director is related, including as a director of that other entity, is void or voidable for this reason only or by reason only that the
director is present at the meeting of directors or at the meeting of the committee of directors that approves the agreement or transaction or that the vote or consent of the director is counted for that purpose if the material facts of the interest
of each director in the agreement or transaction and his or her interest in or relationship to any other party to the agreement or transaction are disclosed in good faith or are known by the other directors. In addition, a director who has an
interest in any particular business to be considered at a meeting of directors or shareholders may be counted for the purposes of determining whether the meeting is duly constituted.



53



---

##### Table of Contents

Our articles of association provide that with the prior or subsequent approval by a resolution of
shareholders, the directors may, by a resolution of directors, fix the emoluments of directors with respect to services to be rendered in any capacity to us.

British Virgin Islands law and our articles of association provide that our business and affairs shall be managed by our directors, who in addition to the powers and authorities expressly conferred by our articles of
association, may also exercise all such powers of the Company as are not by our memorandum, articles of association or British Virgin Islands law required to be exercised by the shareholders.

British Virgin Islands law and our articles of association do not contain an age limit requirement for our directors. Our articles of association do not
contain a share qualification for directors.

Rights of Shareholders

Our memorandum authorizes the issuance of 50,000,000 common shares and 1,000,000 preference shares. We do not have any preference shares currently outstanding. The preference shares may be issued by our directors,
without further action by shareholders. Our directors also have the right to fix by resolution of directors the designations, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the preference shares, such as voting rights
(including the right to vote as a series on particular matters), preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion and redemption rights and sinking fund provisions.

Dividend rights. Subject to the preferential and other dividend rights of any outstanding series of preference shares, holders of our
common shares will be entitled to equal dividends per share when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors. The board may declare interim dividends and recommend a final annual dividend from retained earnings available for cash dividends as
determined for statutory purposes at such times and in such amounts as they may determine. Dividends may only be declared and paid out of surplus. See Item 8.AConsolidated Statements and Other Financial InformationDividend
Policy. According to our articles of association, all dividends that remain unclaimed for a period of three years after their declaration may be forfeited by our Board of Directors for our benefit.

Voting rights. Holders of our common shares have one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Our Board
of Directors is not classified and therefore, all the directors stand for reelection at the same interval.

Liquidation
rights. In the event we are liquidated or wound up, the holders of our common shares will be treated equally on a per share basis and will be entitled to receive all of our remaining assets following distribution of the preferential and/or
other amounts to be distributed to the holders of our preference shares.

Other provisions. We have no provisions in either
our memorandum or articles of association for redemption or sinking fund provisions, or providing that any shareholder has a right to share in our profits. Our common shares are not subject to further capital calls by us. We have no provisions in
our memorandum or articles of association that discriminate against any existing or prospective holder of our common shares as a result of the existing or prospective holders owning a substantial number of our common shares.

Changes to Rights of Shareholders

Under our
memorandum and articles of association and British Virgin Islands law, our memorandum and articles of association may be amended by a resolution of directors or a resolution of members. This includes amendments



| |  |  | increasing or reducing our authorized capital,
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | authorizing the issuance of different classes of shares, including preference shares, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | increasing or reducing the par value of our shares.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------

The directors may
also increase our capital without shareholder approval by transferring a portion of our surplus to capital. Or the directors may reduce our capital without shareholder approval, subject to the requirements of British Virgin Island law, by
transferring a portion of our capital to surplus. Our memorandum and articles of association provide that differences which may rise between us and any of our shareholders, their executors, administrators or assigns relating to our memorandum and
articles of association shall, unless the parties agree to a single arbitrator, be referred to two arbitrators to be chosen by each of the differing parties. No amendment to our memorandum and articles of association will be effective unless and
until it is filed with the Companies Registry of the British Virgin Islands.



54



---

##### Table of Contents

Annual, General and Extraordinary Meetings of Shareholders

British Virgin Islands law and our articles of association do not require us to hold an annual meeting. We do, however, typically hold an annual meeting
of shareholders for the election of directors and for such other business as may come before the meeting.

Under British Virgin Islands
law, unless otherwise provided by a companys memorandum or articles of association, the directors may call meetings of shareholders at any time. Our articles of association require the directors to call meetings upon a written request from
shareholders holding 10% or more of the outstanding voting shares.

Our articles of association provide that notice of all meetings of
shareholders shall be given not fewer than seven days before the date of the proposed meeting to those persons whose names appear as a shareholder in our share register on the date notice is given and are entitled to vote at the meeting. A meeting
of shareholders may be called on shorter notice, however, if members holding, in general, at least 90% of the total number of shares entitled to vote on all matters to be considered at the meeting consent or all the shareholders holding shares
entitled to vote on all matters to be considered at the meeting waive the right of notice.

Limitations on Share Ownership

British Virgin Islands law and our memorandum and articles of association do not impose any limitations on the right of anyone to own, hold or exercise
voting rights to our common shares. British Virgin Islands law does not impose any limitation on the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our common shares.

Indemnity and Insurance

Our articles of association
provide that we may indemnify directors, officers, liquidators and other individuals who act on our behalf or upon our request for liabilities and expenses that they may incur as a result of their actions. We may only indemnify a person who acted
honestly and in good faith with a view to our best interests and, in the case of criminal proceedings, if the person had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful. The decision of the directors as to whether a person acted
honestly and in good faith is, in the absence of fraud, conclusive unless a question of law is involved. We also are entitled under our articles of association to purchase and maintain directors and officers liability insurance.

Certain Anti-Takeover Matters

Under our memorandum
and articles of association and the laws of the British Virgin Islands, our memorandum and articles of association may be amended by a resolution of directors or a resolution of members. This includes amendments authorizing the creation of different
classes of shares, including preference shares. Our ability to amend our memorandum and articles of association by a resolution of directors could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of us without any further
action by our shareholders including but not limited to, a tender offer to purchase our common shares at a premium over then current market prices. In addition, the issuance of preference shares without shareholder approval, on terms as the Board of
Directors may determine, could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of our common shares, including the loss of voting control to others.

Ownership Information

British Virgin Islands law and our memorandum and articles of association do not provide that
information about our shareholders, even those owning significant percentages of our shares, must be disclosed.

Differences from United States Law

In general, the laws of the British Virgin Islands governing the provisions of our memorandum and articles of association discussed
above are not significantly different than the laws governing similar provisions in the charter documents of Delaware companies, other than with respect to the holding of an annual meeting for our shareholders and the amendment of our memorandum and
articles of association. We are not required by the laws of the British Virgin Islands to hold an annual meeting for our shareholders but we would be required to hold an annual meeting if we were incorporated under Delaware law. If we choose not to
hold an annual meeting, then the ability of our shareholders to submit and vote on proposals would be significantly less than that of shareholders in U.S. companies incorporated in Delaware. In addition, our Board of Directors may amend our
memorandum of association under certain circumstances without shareholder approval, whereas Delaware law requires shareholders to approve any amendments to a Delaware corporations certificate of incorporation.



55



---

##### Table of Contents

We are a British Virgin Islands company and our affairs are governed by, among other things, the
International Business Companies Act (IBCA) of the British Virgin Islands. IBCA of British Virgin Islands differs from laws applicable to United States corporations and their shareholders. Since it is impractical and burdensome to list
all the difference items, set forth below is a brief description of identifiable differences between the provisions of IBCA applicable to us and those followed by domestic companies under the NYSE listing standards.

Board composition

Pursuant to section 42 of IBCA, the business and
affairs of a BVI company shall be managed by a board of directors that consists of one or more persons but it is silent on the requirement of having a majority of independent directors. In addition, there is no requirement to evaluate
directors independence from management.

Scheduled independent director meeting

There is no requirement that non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive meetings not attended by management. Under Section 48(1) if IBCA, the directors may meet at such times and in such
manner and places within or outside the British Virgin Islands as the directors may determine to be necessary or desirable.

Nominating/corporate
governance committee

The NYSE listing standards require companies to have a nominating/corporate governance committee comprised of independent
directors governed by a written charter establishing minimum requirements. There is no such requirement under BVI rules.

Compensation committee

The NYSE listing standards require companies to have a compensation committee comprised entirely of independent directors governed by a written charter
establishing certain minimum requirements. There is no such requirement under the BVI rules.

Audit committee

The NYSE listing standards require companies to have an audit committee consisting of three independent members of the board if directors governed by a written charter
establishing the duties and responsibilities of the audit committee. There is no such requirement under BVI rules. However, we have an audit committee governed by a written charter consisting of three independent directors as defined in Rule 10A-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

CEO Certification

There is no requirement that the Chief Executive Officer must certify annually to the NYSE that he knows of no violation by the Company relating to corporate governance. Also the Chief Executive Officer must notify
the NYSE in writing if an executive officer of the Company becomes aware of any material non-compliance of the NYSE corporate governance listing requirements, notwithstanding our status as a foreign private issuer.

Code of business conduct and ethics

The NYSE standards require that
each listed company adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. We have such a code adopted for senior financial
officers, as is permitted for a foreign private issuer.

Indemnification

Pursuant to subsection 57(1) of IBCA, a company under its Articles or Memorandum, may provide for indemnification for directors and officers, except where their actions are a violation of their fiduciary duties or are
performed in a willfully negligent manner. It also provides for reimbursement of all expenses including legal fees and indemnifications against civil fraud or the consequence of committing a crime. However, the SEC provides for reimbursement to the
Company by chief executive officers and chief financial officers of bonuses, or other incentive-based compensation and stock sale profits during the year following an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance or as a result of misconduct.



56



---

##### Table of Contents

Inspection of books and records

Subsection 67(4) of IBCA allows a company to refuse a request from shareholders or their attorneys to inspect the share register, the books and records and contracts kept by a company, if the Company, by resolution of
its directors, determines that it is not the best interest of the Company to do so. However, we are required to provide shareholders and the NYSE certain material information under NYSE rules.



|C. | Material contracts.
|-- | -------------------

On March 17, 2006, we contributed our OLED fixed assets (including a clean room and prototyping equipment) in Dongguan Lite Array Company Limited into Lite Array Holdings Limited (Lite Array) and also
transferred all of our know-how and personnel associated with our OLED development program into Lite Array.

Effective April 3, 2006,
we sold 70% of Lite Array to Anwell Technologies Limited (Anwell) a publicly listed company in Singapore for a $5.6 million convertible note. The transaction is expected to result in a net gain when recorded.

Lite Array will continue to operate in our Dongguan facility and will leverage the design and manufacturing capabilities of both Anwell and ourselves to
pursue potential opportunities in the OLED market. The key objective of Lite Array is to design and implement a significantly improved and less costly process for manufacturing OLEDs.



|D. | Exchange controls.
|-- | ------------------

General

There are currently no limitations either under British Virgin Islands or U.S. law or in our articles of
association to the rights of shareholders to hold or vote common shares, or to pay dividends, interest or other payments to nonresident shareholders. There are currently no restrictions in the British Virgin Islands regarding our export and import
of capital, including the availability of cash and cash equivalents for use by our affiliated companies.



|E. | Taxation.
|-- | ---------

UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

General

This section summarizes the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to holders of our common shares as of the date of this annual report. The summary applies to you only if you hold our common shares as a
capital asset for tax purposes (that is, for investment purposes). The summary does not cover state, local or foreign law, or the possible application of U.S. federal estate, gift or excise tax. In addition, this summary does not apply to you if you
are a member of a class of holders subject to special rules, such as:



| |  |  | a dealer in securities or currencies;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | a trader in securities that elects to use a mark to market method of accounting for your securities holdings;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a bank;
| | - |  | -------



| |  |  | a life insurance company;
| | - |  | -------------------------



| |  |  | a tax exempt organization;
| | - |  | --------------------------



| |  |  | a person that holds our common shares as part of a straddle or a hedging, integrated, constructive sale or conversion transaction for tax purposes;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a person whose functional currency for tax purposes is not the U.S. dollar;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a person liable for alternative minimum tax; or
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a person that owns, or is treated as owning, 10% or more of our common shares.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The discussion is based on current law. Changes in the law may alter your tax treatment of holding our common shares, possibly on a retroactive basis.



57



---

##### Table of Contents

The discussion does not cover tax consequences that depend upon your particular tax circumstances. We
recommend that you consult your tax advisor about the consequences of your holding our common shares in your particular situation.

For
purposes of the discussion below, you are a U.S. holder if you are a beneficial owner of our common shares who or which is:



| |  |  | an individual U.S. citizen or resident alien (as specifically defined for tax purposes);
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a corporation, or entity taxable as a corporation, that was created under U.S. law (federal or state);
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source; or
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a trust (a) if a U.S. court can exercise primary supervision over the trusts administration and one or more U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial
decisions of the trust or (b) if it has a valid election in effect under applicable treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you are not a U.S. holder, you are a Non U.S. holder, and the discussion below titled Tax Consequences to Non U.S. Holders will apply to you.

If a partnership holds our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of
the partnership. If you are a partner of a partnership holding common shares, you should consult your tax advisor.

Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders

Distributions. We typically retain all earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. If distributions are made, however, the gross amount of any such distribution (other than in liquidation) that you receive with respect to our common shares generally will be taxed to
you as dividend income to the extent such distribution does not exceed our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such income will be includable in your gross income on the date of receipt
and may be treated as qualified dividend income, which is currently subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15% in the case of individual taxpayers (subject generally, to a 60-day holding period requirement). In the event of such a
distribution, we will indicate its eligibility for treatment as qualified dividend income on the 1099-DIV form or other informational return that is furnished to recipients. To the extent any distribution exceeds our accumulated earnings
and profits, the distribution will first be treated as a tax free return of capital to the extent of your adjusted tax basis in our common shares and will be applied against and reduce such basis on a dollar-for-dollar basis (thereby increasing the
amount of gain and decreasing the amount of loss recognized on a subsequent disposition of such shares). To the extent that such distribution exceeds your adjusted tax basis, the distribution will be taxed as a gain recognized on a sale or exchange
of our common shares. See Sale or Other disposition of common shares below. Because we are not a U.S. corporation, no dividends received deduction will be allowed to corporations with respect to dividends paid by us. Dividends paid with
respect to our common shares will generally be treated as foreign source passive income or, in the case of certain types of financial institutions, financial services income, for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax
credits for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.

Sale or other disposition of common shares. Generally speaking, in connection
with the sale or other taxable disposition of our common shares:



| |  |  | you will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference (if any) between the amount realized on such sale or other taxable disposition, and your adjusted tax basis in such common
shares;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss and will be long term capital gain or loss if your holding period for our common shares is more than one year at the time of such
sale or other disposition;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any gain or loss will generally be treated as having a U.S. source for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your ability to deduct capital losses will be subject to limitations.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Passive foreign investment company. U.S. holders generally would be subject to a special, adverse tax regime (that would differ in certain respects from that described above) if we are or were to be
classified as a passive foreign



58



---

##### Table of Contents

investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Although the determination of whether a corporation is a passive
foreign investment company is made annually, and thus may be subject to change, we do not believe that we are, nor do we expect to become, a passive foreign investment company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we urge you to consult your own U.S. tax
advisor regarding the adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning the shares of a passive foreign investment company and of making certain elections designed to lessen those adverse consequences.

Tax Consequences to Non U.S. Holders

Distributions. If you are a Non U.S. holder, you generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including withholding tax, on distributions made on our common shares unless you conduct a trade or business in the
United States and the distributions are effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business (and, if an applicable income tax treaty so requires as a condition for you to be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in
respect of income from our common shares, such distributions are attributable to a permanent establishment that you maintain in the United States).

If you fail the above test, you generally will be subject to tax in respect of such dividends in the same manner as a U.S. holder, as described above. In addition, any effectively connected dividends received by a non U.S. corporation may
also, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

Sale or other disposition of common shares. If you are a Non U.S. holder, you will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax, including
withholding tax, in respect of gain recognized on a sale or other taxable disposition of our common shares unless:



| |  |  | your gain is effectively connected with a trade or business that you conduct in the United States (and, if an applicable income tax treaty so requires as a condition for you to be
subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of gain from the sale or other disposition of our common shares, such gain is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by you in the United States); or
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | you are an individual Non U.S. holder and are present in the United States for at least 183 days in the taxable year of the sale or other disposition, and certain other conditions
exist.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You will be subject to tax in respect of any gain effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in
the United States in the same manner as a U.S. holder, as described above. Effectively connected gains realized by a non U.S. corporation may also, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of
30% or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Payments (or other taxable distributions) in respect of our common shares that are made in the United States or by a U.S. related financial intermediary
will be subject to U.S. information reporting rules. Unless we are notified by the IRS, you will not be subject to backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax currently at a rate of 28% provided that:



| |  |  | you are a corporation or other exempt recipient; or
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | you provide a taxpayer identification number (which, in the case of an individual, is his or her taxpayer identification number) and certify that no loss of exemption from backup
withholding has occurred.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you are not a U.S. person, you generally are not subject to information reporting and backup
withholding, but you may be required to provide a certification of your non U.S. status in order to establish that you are exempt.

Amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules may be credited against your U.S. federal income tax liability, and you may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with
the Internal Revenue Service.

BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS TAX CONSEQUENCES

Under the International Business Companies Act of the British Virgin Islands as currently in effect, a holder of common equity, such as our common
shares, who is not a resident of the British Virgin Islands is exempt from British Virgin Islands income tax on dividends paid with respect to the common equity and all holders of common equity are



59



---

##### Table of Contents

not liable to the British Virgin Islands for income tax on gains realized on sale or disposal of such shares. The British
Virgin Islands does not impose a withholding tax on dividends paid by a company incorporated under the International Business Companies Act.

There are no capital gains, gift or inheritance taxes levied by the British Virgin Islands on companies incorporated under the International Business Companies Act. In addition, our common shares are not subject to transfer taxes, stamp
duties or similar charges.

There is no income tax treaty or convention currently in effect between the United States and the British
Virgin Islands.



|F. | Dividends and paying agents.
|-- | ----------------------------

Not
Applicable.



|G. | Statement by experts.
|-- | ---------------------

Not Applicable.



|H. | Documents on display.
|-- | ---------------------

For further information with respect to us and our common shares, we refer you to the filings we have made with the SEC. Statements contained in this annual report concerning the contents of any contract or any other
documents are not necessarily complete. If a contract or document has been filed as an exhibit to any filing we have made with the SEC, we refer you to the copy of the contract or document that has been filed. Each statement in this annual report
relating to a contract or document filed as an exhibit is qualified in all respects by the filed exhibit. We are subject to certain of the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, in accordance with the Exchange Act,
file reports and other information with the SEC. Our registration statements, including the exhibits and schedules thereto, and such reports and other information, can be inspected and copied at the following public reference facilities maintained
by the SEC:

Woolworth Building

233 Broadway

New York, New York 10279

175 W. Jackson Boulevard

Suite 900

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Copies of these materials can also be obtained by mail at prescribed rates from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, NE,
Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1 800 SEC 0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains registration statements, reports and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.



|I. | Subsidiary information.
|-- | -----------------------

Not Applicable.

Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We are exposed to the impact of
foreign currency fluctuations, interest rate changes and the potential increases in cost of plastic resins and metals. We have not entered into foreign currency hedge, interest rate swaps or commodity futures for speculative purposes or otherwise.

We sell a majority of our products in U.S. dollars and pay for our materials and components in U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars and Chinese
Renminbi. We pay labor and overhead expenses in Renminbi, Hong Kong dollars and U.S dollars. The exchange rate of the Hong Kong dollar to the U.S. dollar has been fixed by the Hong Kong Government since 1983 at approximately HK$7.80 to US$1.00
through the currency issuing banks in Hong Kong. Consequently, the Company has not experienced any currency exchange risk exposure relating to the Hong Kong dollar in the past. This could change in the future if those in Hong Kong who are proposing
a floating currency system prevail in the ongoing debate over whether to continue to peg the Hong Kong dollar to the U.S. dollar.



60



---

##### Table of Contents

Effective January 1, 1994, China adopted a floating currency system whereby the official exchange
rate equals the market rate. Since the market rate and official rates were unified, the value of the Renminbi against the Hong Kong dollar and U.S. dollar has been stable. On July 21, 2005, the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC)
decided to abandon its policy of pegging the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar and link the Renminbi to a basket of currencies. The PBOC also strengthened the exchange rate of the Renminbi at that time to 8.11 to the U.S. dollar from 8.28. The Chinese
authorities have therefore taken their first step towards a floating currency. This reform will cost U.S. companies more to buy Chinese products. Revaluation will have a different impact on different segments of our business but we believe our most
significant foreign exchange risk results from our manufacturing operations in China. Labor and other overhead expenses (excluding non-cash depreciation charges) in our Chinese factory incurred in Renminbi were approximately 25.5% and 10.8% of our
net sales in fiscal 2005 and 2006, respectively. We believe any future appreciation of the Renminbi would result in an increase in our operating costs in China and materially impact our financial results. A 1% appreciation in the Renminbi would
increase our operating costs by approximately US$80,000. As of March 31, 2006, the exchange rate was 8.0617 and as of September 26, 2006 the exchange rate was 7.9135, a 1.3% appreciation since our fiscal year end. Our foreign currency
exposure in our assets and liabilities were immaterial at March 31, 2006.

Our primary interest rate risk exposure results from
floating rate debt. At the beginning fiscal 2005, all of our long-term debt consisted of floating rate debt and we had an aggregate outstanding long-term debt of $374,000. As of March 31, 2005, all our long-term debt had been repaid. From April
2005 to November 2005 we utilized our Hong Kong dollar overdarft facilities under our line of credit averaging approximately US$700,000 for the eight month period. Our overdraft interest rate was 7.75%. Since the Hong Kong dollar is pegged to the
U.S. dollar, we might have to bear higher interest expense for any future bank loans if U.S. interest rates continue to increase. We currently do not hedge our exposure to floating interest rate risk and have no debt outstanding denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar.

We are dependent upon outside suppliers for all of our raw material needs, including plastic resins
and various metals. Consequently, the results of our operations are subject to price fluctuations in these raw materials. The plastic resins used by us are derived from natural gas liquids, which may fluctuate as a result of changes in natural gas
and crude oil prices, and the relative capacity, supply and demand for resin and petrochemical intermediates from which the resins are produced. We have no long-term supply contracts for the purchase of plastic resin, although we do generally
maintain a 90-day supply. In the past, we have had limited ability to increase prices to offset plastic resin price increases. Currently, plastic resin prices are increasing significantly due to the international supply and demand for oil and the
political instability in the Middle East. We expect that plastic resin prices will continue to increase in the near future and that it will be difficult for us to pass these cost increases on to our customers. Our total purchase of plastic resins in
fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006 were $11.0 million, $12.0 million and $13.3 million, respectively. If plastic resins prices in fiscal 2007 were to increase on an average of 10.0% from March 31, 2006 prices, and assuming we use the same amount of
plastic resins as during fiscal 2006, the additional annual expense to us in fiscal 2007 would be approximately $1.3 million. As of August 31, 2006, resin prices had already increased over 25% from their March 31, 2006 level and our
customers are still not willing to compensate us in any way for the additional cost.

We also use significant quantities of stainless steel
and copper wire. Our total purchases of steel and other metal products (excluding copper wire) in fiscal 2004, 2005 and 2006 were approximately $1.3 million, $1.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively. If metal prices were to increase 10% in fiscal
2007 from fiscal 2006 and we use the same quantities and mix of metal, the additional expense to us would be approximately $450,000. Copper used primarily in our electric motors and wiring has been particularly volatile. Our purchases of copper wire
in fiscal 2006 amounted to approximately $300,000. The spot price in cents per pound has risen from 135.85 as of March 31, 2004 to 248.80 as of March 31, 2006. Since our year end copper increased a further 39% to 346.90 as of
August 31, 2006 and to date we have not received any pricing relief for any of these cost increases.

Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities.



|A. | Debt securities.
|-- | ----------------

Not
applicable.



|B. | Warrants and rights.
|-- | --------------------

Not
applicable.

PART II

Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies.

We are not in material default of any of our
obligations relating to indebtedness. We are not delinquent with respect to the payment of dividends.



61



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.

During our last
fiscal year, we have not materially modified any of the rights or instruments defining the rights of our security holders. We do not have any registered securities that are secured by our assets. The trustees or paying agents for our securities have
not changed during the last fiscal year.

Use of Proceeds

On April 7, 1998, the SEC declared effective our Registration Statement on Form F-1, File No. 333-8462, for the registration of 4,830,000 common shares in our initial public offering. Net proceeds from the
initial public offering were approximately $81.0 million. As of April 2003, we had used the net proceeds of the offering as follows: approximately $16.5 million for a payment of a dividend; $9.8 million for the acquisition of a majority interest in
Lite Array; $6.6 million for the expansion of the Dongguan facility and the purchase of fuel energy saving equipment; $2.0 million for the purchase of machinery, tooling and equipment; and $10.4 million for the repayment of indebtedness as reported
in prior filings. From five years after our listing on the NYSE, we no longer keep track of the use of proceeds as there are continuous inflows and outflows of cash from operating and financing activities. We believe we can finance our existing
business and new projects from the cash generated from our operating, financing and investing activities and we are able to maintain an adequate level of funds for potential business development or acquisition. Most of our fund balance continues to
remain in temporary investments, including short-term marketable securities, U.S. dollar denominated interest-bearing savings accounts and a money market fund.

Item 15. Controls and Procedures.

The Company maintains a system of controls and procedures designed to
provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the financial statements and other disclosures included in this report, as well as to safeguard assets from unauthorized use or disposition. The Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design
and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures under supervision and with the participation of management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based upon that evaluation, the companys Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer concluded that the companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
required to be included in the Companys periodic SEC filings.

In making its assessment of internal control as of March 31,
2006, the Companys independent auditors notified us that they had identified inadequate knowledge of U.S. GAAP in its internal accounting staff as a material weakness. Management recognizes that complex accounting issues initially were not
fully applied or understood completely and the internal staff had to be advised by external consultants on the appropriate application of the relevant standards. All necessary corrections were made well prior to any public announcements or filings
with the SEC. Management recognizes the need to enhance its accounting staffs U.S. GAAP knowledge and the Company has began to implement corrective action, including hiring additional experienced staff, and improving the process to identify
and evaluate complex U.S. issues and new accounting standards. It also believes that external resources will continue to be necessary to advise our internal accounting staff if it is to remain current with the voluminous pronouncements and standards
that constitute the body of U.S. GAAP.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of controls and procedures,
including the possibility of human error and circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Further, the design of an internal control system must reflect the fact that we are subject to resource constraints, and the derived benefit
must be evaluated as related to costs. When preparing its financial statements for fiscal 2005, the Company discovered an inadvertent error in its previously reported results for its fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 and previously announced
fiscal 2005 periods. This unintentional error resulted from the failure for the last three quarters of fiscal 2004 and the first three quarters of fiscal 2005 to recognize non-cash compensation expense and income, respectively, related to the
application of variable accounting to unexercised stock options issued by the Company in 2000 in an option exchange program. The Company took remedial action to issue a press release to the public and has filed an amended Form 20-F for fiscal 2004
and an amended Form 6-K with an amended quarterly report for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2004 to include the restated financial statements reflecting these changes.

It should be noted that the design of any system of control is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can
be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. No significant changes were made to the Companys internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect these
controls subsequent to the date of evaluation.

Item 16. [Reserved].

Not applicable.



62



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The audit committee is composed entirely of independent
directors and is responsible for reviewing, and making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the Companys accounting policies, reporting practices, internal controls, annual and quarterly financial statements and financial
information included in the Companys reporting and disclosure documents with the SEC. The Committee also reviews significant audit findings, material litigation and claims whether asserted or unasserted and any issues between management and
the external auditors.

The audit committee closely monitors the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Additionally, the audit
committee assesses its mandate and performance at least annually.

The audit committee is currently comprised of three independent
directors, Barry J. Buttifant, Patrick Po-On Hui and Ken Ying-Keung Wong. Mr. Buttifant is the chairman of the audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Barry J. Buttifant meets or exceeds the training, knowledge and
requirements for a financial expert (as defined) and is thus designated as the Companys financial expert on the audit committee. We have to file Section 303A Foreign Private Issuer Annual Written Affirmation as required by
NYSE to assert the independence of our audit committee members and other matters within 30 days of the date a company files its report on Form 20-F with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Mr. Buttifant is a fellow member of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants and the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
He is also a fellow member of the Chartered Management Institute; the Hong Kong Management Association and the Hong Kong Institute of Directors. See Item 6.A  Directors and senior management for his biography.

Item 16B. Code of Ethics.

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Ernst & Young became our independent auditors
in fiscal 2003. Fees payable for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 to Ernst & Young are detailed below:



|                   |  |                                  |         |                                  |   |        
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------- | ------- | -------------------------------- | - | -------
|                   |  | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2006 |         | Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2005
|Audit fees         |  | $                                | 219,000 |                                  | $ | 165,000
|Audit-related fees |  |                                  | Nil     |                                  |   | Nil    
|Tax fees           |  |                                  | Nil     |                                  |   | Nil    
|All other fees     |  |                                  | 4,000   |                                  |   | Nil    
|                   |  |                                  |         |                                  |   |        
|Total fees         |  | $                                | 223,000 |                                  | $ | 165,000
|                   |  |                                  |         |                                  |   |        

The nature of each category of fee is described below:

Audit Fees.The audit fees include fees for audit or review of the Companys financial reports plus fees for services that generally an auditor can
reasonably provide.

Audit-Related Fees.We did not engage Ernst & Young for any other audited-related services arrangement.

Tax Fees.We did not engage Ernst & Young for any other tax services arrangement.

All Other Fees.The services include the statutory audit and review of documents filed with the SEC.

Pre-Approval Polices and Procedures.The audit committee has determined that the provision of services other than audit services should be provided by a
firm other than the one that performs our audit. The audit committee, pursuant to its written charter, pre-approves all audit services provided by Ernst & Young. To the extent Ernst & Young provides any non-audit services in the
future the audit committee is empowered to also pre-approve such services. Currently, our independent auditor is Ernst & Young and we engage PricewaterhouseCoopers as our main tax advisor.



63



---

##### Table of Contents

PART III

Item 17. Financial Statements.

Not applicable.

Item 18. Financial Statements.

See pages F-1 through F-45 incorporated herein by reference.

Item 19. Exhibits.

See Exhibit Index on page E-1.



64



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

Date: September 29, 2006



GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC.By:

/s/ JOHN C.K. SHAMJohn C.K. ShamPresident and Chief Executive Officer




65



---

##### Table of Contents

Audited Financial Statements

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC.

(Incorporated in the British Virgin Islands with limited liability)

March 31, 2005
and 2006



F-1



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|                                                                                                                   |  |            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------
|                                                                                                                   |  | Pages      
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm                                                            |  | F-3        
|                                                                                                                   | 
|Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2005 and 2006                                                          |  | F-4        
|                                                                                                                   | 
|Consolidated Statements of Operations for Each of the Three Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2006                      |  | F-5        
|                                                                                                                   | 
|Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for Each of the Three Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2006 |  | F-6 - F-8  
|                                                                                                                   | 
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2006                      |  | F-9 - F-10 
|                                                                                                                   | 
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                                         |  | F-11 - F-45



F-2



---

##### Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
of

Global-Tech Appliances Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Global-Tech Appliances Inc. (the Company) and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Global-Tech
Appliances Inc. and its subsidiaries at March 31, 2005 and 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Ernst & Young

Hong Kong

August 4, 2006



F-3



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF MARCH 31, 2005 AND 2006



|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | - |  | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                                      |  | 2005        |   |  | 2006       |  
|                                                                                                                      |  | US$         |   |  | US$        |  
|ASSETS                                                                                                                |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Current assets:                                                                                                       |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                             |  | 8,790,594   |   |  | 27,313,746 |  
|Restricted cash                                                                                                       |  | 430,974     |   |  |           |  
|Callable deposit                                                                                                      |  | 5,000,000   |   |  |           |  
|Short-term investments                                                                                                |  | 33,966,281  |   |  | 18,715,682 |  
|Accounts and bills receivable, net                                                                                    |  | 7,194,894   |   |  | 8,446,502  |  
|Prepaid expenses                                                                                                      |  | 601,610     |   |  | 252,585    |  
|Deposits and other assets                                                                                             |  | 1,722,285   |   |  | 1,677,041  |  
|Legal claims receivable                                                                                               |  |            |   |  | 4,577,186  |  
|Inventories                                                                                                           |  | 14,056,562  |   |  | 10,780,816 |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                  |  | 71,763,200  |   |  | 71,763,558 |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |            
|Loan to a director                                                                                                    |  | 76,667      |   |  |           |  
|Property, plant and equipment, net                                                                                    |  | 27,779,778  |   |  | 24,164,775 |  
|Land use rights, net                                                                                                  |  | 2,191,759   |   |  | 2,151,444  |  
|License, net                                                                                                          |  | 2,201,124   |   |  |           |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Total assets                                                                                                          |  | 104,012,528 |   |  | 98,079,777 |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY                                                                                  |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                                                  |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Short-term bank borrowings                                                                                            |  | 37,507      |   |  | 37,698     |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                                      |  | 5,258,005   |   |  | 5,075,248  |  
|Salaries and allowances payable                                                                                       |  | 730,976     |   |  | 587,717    |  
|Accrued expenses                                                                                                      |  | 3,061,568   |   |  | 3,797,401  |  
|Accrual for contingent losses                                                                                         |  | 810,000     |   |  | 5,464,134  |  
|Income tax payable                                                                                                    |  | 3,698,237   |   |  | 3,730,043  |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                             |  | 13,596,293  |   |  | 18,692,241 |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |            
|Deferred tax liabilities                                                                                              |  | 142,888     |   |  | 38,619     |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Total liabilities                                                                                                     |  | 13,739,181  |   |  | 18,730,860 |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Minority interests                                                                                                    |  | 12,528      |   |  |           |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Shareholders equity:                                                                                                 |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Common stock, par value US$0.01; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 12,902,755 shares issued as of March 31, 2005 and 2006 |  | 129,028     |   |  | 129,028    |  
|Preferred stock, par value US$0.01; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued                                     |  |            |   |  |           |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                            |  | 83,264,716  |   |  | 83,030,824 |  
|Retained earnings                                                                                                     |  | 12,103,067  |   |  | 879,673    |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive losses                                                                                |  | (742,545    | ) |  | (197,161   | )
|Less: Treasury stock, at cost, 679,147 shares as of March 31, 2005 and 2006                                           |  | (4,493,447  | ) |  | (4,493,447 | )
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Total shareholders equity                                                                                            |  | 90,260,819  |   |  | 79,348,917 |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  
|Total liabilities and shareholders equity                                                                            |  | 104,012,528 |   |  | 98,079,777 |  
|                                                                                                                      |  |             |   |  |            |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



F-4



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004, 2005 AND 2006



|                                                                |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | - |  | ----------- | - |  | ----------- | -
|                                                                |  | 2004        |   |  | 2005        |   |  | 2006        |  
|                                                                |  | US$         |   |  | US$         |   |  | US$         |  
|Net sales                                                       |  | 66,901,315  |   |  | 41,851,163  |   |  | 73,812,100  |  
|                                                                |  |             |  
|Cost of goods sold                                              |  | (52,942,382 | ) |  | (44,595,004 | ) |  | (69,816,822 | )
|                                                                |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Gross profit (loss)                                             |  | 13,958,933  |   |  | (2,743,841  | ) |  | 3,995,278   |  
|                                                                |  |             |  
|Selling, general and administrative expenses                    |  | (19,018,822 | ) |  | (16,053,820 | ) |  | (18,010,869 | )
|Other operating income (loss)                                   |  |            |   |  | (810,000    | ) |  | 2,379,964   |  
|                                                                |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Operating loss                                                  |  | (5,059,889  | ) |  | (19,607,661 | ) |  | (11,635,627 | )
|Interest expense                                                |  | (17,589     | ) |  | (9,855      | ) |  | (55,435     | )
|Interest income                                                 |  | 851,066     |   |  | 976,753     |   |  | 1,278,093   |  
|Other income (expenses), net                                    |  | 427,814     |   |  | 31,589      |   |  | (846,015    | )
|                                                                |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Loss from operations before income taxes                        |  | (3,798,598  | ) |  | (18,609,174 | ) |  | (11,258,984 | )
|Benefit (provision) for income taxes                            |  | (107,767    | ) |  | (33,650     | ) |  | 22,998      |  
|                                                                |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Net loss before minority interests                              |  | (3,906,365  | ) |  | (18,642,824 | ) |  | (11,235,986 | )
|Minority interests                                              |  |            |   |  | 19,525      |   |  | 12,592      |  
|                                                                |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Net loss                                                        |  | (3,906,365  | ) |  | (18,623,299 | ) |  | (11,223,394 | )
|                                                                |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Basic and diluted loss per common share                         |  | (0.32       | ) |  | (1.52       | ) |  | (0.92       | )
|                                                                |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|                                                                |  | Number      |   |  | Number      |   |  | Number      |  
|Basic and diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding |  | 12,152,592  |   |  | 12,214,800  |   |  | 12,223,608  |  
|                                                                |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



F-5



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006



|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |              |   |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | - |  | -------------- | - |  | ------------ | - |  | ------------------------- | - |  | ---------------- | - |  | -------------- | - |  | ------------------------------------ | - |  | ------------------------- | -
|                                                                                    |  | Number of shares |   |  | Amounts        |  
|                                                                                    |  | Common stock     |   |  | Treasury stock |   |  | Common stock |   |  | Additionalpaid-in capital |   |  | Retainedearnings |   |  | Treasury stock |   |  | Accumulated othercomprehensivelosses |   |  | Total shareholdersequity |  
|Balance as of March 31, 2003                                                        |  | 12,830,000       |   |  | (689,147       | ) |  | 128,300      |   |  | 81,753,145                |   |  | 34,682,164       |   |  | (4,600,127     | ) |  | (622,163                             | ) |  | 111,341,319               |  
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |             
|Net loss for the year                                                               |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |             |   |  |                          |   |  | (3,906,365       | ) |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | (3,906,365                | )
|Other comprehensive income:                                                         |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |              |   |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|     unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of income tax of US$nil |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |             |   |  |                          |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  | 43,684                               |   |  | 43,684                    |  
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |             
|     foreign currency translation adjustments                                      |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |             |   |  |                          |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  | 22,981                               |   |  | 22,981                    |  
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |              |   |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|Total net comprehensive loss                                                        |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |              |   |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  | (3,839,700                | )
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |             
|Issuance of treasury stock                                                          |  |                 |   |  | 10,000         |   |  |             |   |  |                          |   |  |                 |   |  | 106,680        |   |  |                                     |   |  | 106,680                   |  
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |             
|Loss on issuance of treasury stock                                                  |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |             |   |  |                          |   |  | (49,433          | ) |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | (49,433                   | )
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |             
|Stock compensation expense provided on options granted                              |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |             |   |  | 2,355,319                 |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | 2,355,319                 |  
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |             
|Shares issued on exercise of options                                                |  | 36,545           |   |  |               |   |  | 365          |   |  | 205,868                   |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | 206,233                   |  
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |             
|Shares retired                                                                      |  | (9,500           | ) |  |               |   |  | (95          | ) |  | (87,782                   | ) |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | (87,877                   | )
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |              |   |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|Balance as of March 31, 2004                                                        |  | 12,857,045       |   |  | (679,147       | ) |  | 128,570      |   |  | 84,226,550                |   |  | 30,726,366       |   |  | (4,493,447     | ) |  | (555,498                             | ) |  | 110,032,541               |  
|                                                                                    |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |              |   |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



F-6



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006



|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | -------------- | ------- |  | ------------ |  | ------------------------- | - |  | ---------------- | - |  | -------------- | - |  | ------------------------------------ | - |  | ------------------------- | -
|                                                                                            |  | Number of shares |  |                | Amounts | 
|                                                                                            |  | Common stock     |  | Treasury stock |         |  | Common stock |  | Additionalpaid-in capital |   |  | Retainedearnings |   |  | Treasury stock |   |  | Accumulated othercomprehensivelosses |   |  | Total shareholdersequity |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  | US$          |  | US$                       |   |  | US$              |   |  | US$            |   |  | US$                                  |   |  | US$                       |  
|Balance as of March 31, 2004                                                                |  | 12,857,045       |  | (679,147       | )       |  | 128,570      |  | 84,226,550                |   |  | 30,726,366       |   |  | (4,493,447     | ) |  | (555,498                             | ) |  | 110,032,541               |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|Net loss for the year                                                                       |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  |                          |   |  | (18,623,299      | ) |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | (18,623,299               | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|Other comprehensive loss:                                                                   |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|     unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of income tax of US$nil         |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  |                          |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  | (116,846                             | ) |  | (116,846                  | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|     reclassification adjustment for gains net of losses included in net loss for the year |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  |                          |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  | (36,219                              | ) |  | (36,219                   | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|     foreign currency translation adjustments                                              |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  |                          |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  | (33,982                              | ) |  | (33,982                   | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|Total net comprehensive loss                                                                |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  | (18,810,346               | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|Stock compensation expense reversed on options granted                                      |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  | (1,247,061                | ) |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | (1,247,061                | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|Shares issued on exercise of options                                                        |  | 45,710           |  |               |         |  | 458          |  | 285,227                   |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | 285,685                   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|Balance as of March 31, 2005                                                                |  | 12,902,755       |  | (679,147       | )       |  | 129,028      |  | 83,264,716                |   |  | 12,103,067       |   |  | (4,493,447     | ) |  | (742,545                             | ) |  | 90,260,819                |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



F-7



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006



|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | -------------- | ------- |  | ------------ |  | ------------------------- | - |  | ---------------- | - |  | -------------- | - |  | ------------------------------------ | - |  | ------------------------- | -
|                                                                                            |  | Number of shares |  |                | Amounts | 
|                                                                                            |  | Common stock     |  | Treasury stock |         |  | Common stock |  | Additionalpaid-in capital |   |  | Retainedearnings |   |  | Treasury stock |   |  | Accumulated othercomprehensivelosses |   |  | Total shareholdersequity |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  | US$          |  | US$                       |   |  | US$              |   |  | US$            |   |  | US$                                  |   |  | US$                       |  
|Balance as of March 31, 2005                                                                |  | 12,902,755       |  | (679,147       | )       |  | 129,028      |  | 83,264,716                |   |  | 12,103,067       |   |  | (4,493,447     | ) |  | (742,545                             | ) |  | 90,260,819                |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|Net loss for the year                                                                       |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  |                          |   |  | (11,223,394      | ) |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | (11,223,394               | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|Other comprehensive income (loss):                                                          |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|     unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of income tax of US$nil         |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  |                          |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  | 199,290                              |   |  | 199,290                   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|     reclassification adjustment for gains net of losses included in net loss for the year |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  |                          |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  | (116,076                             | ) |  | (116,076                  | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|     foreign currency translation adjustments                                              |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  |                          |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  | 462,170                              |   |  | 462,170                   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|Total net comprehensive loss                                                                |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  | (10,678,010               | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|Stock compensation expense provided on options granted                                      |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  | 112,600                   |   |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | 112,600                   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              | 
|Stock compensation expense reversed on options granted                                      |  |                 |  |               |         |  |             |  | (346,492                  | ) |  |                 |   |  |               |   |  |                                     |   |  | (346,492                  | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  
|Balance as of March 31, 2006                                                                |  | 12,902,755       |  | (679,147       | )       |  | 129,028      |  | 83,030,824                |   |  | 879,673          |   |  | (4,493,447     | ) |  | (197,161                             | ) |  | 79,348,917                |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |  |                |         |  |              |  |                           |   |  |                  |   |  |                |   |  |                                      |   |  |                           |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



F-8



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006



|                                                                                          |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | - |  | ----------- | - |  | ----------- | -
|                                                                                          |  | 2004       |   |  | 2005        |   |  | 2006        |  
|                                                                                          |  | US$        |   |  | US$         |   |  | US$         |  
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                                     |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Net loss                                                                                  |  | (3,906,365 | ) |  | (18,623,299 | ) |  | (11,223,394 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Minority interests in loss of a subsidiary                                                |  |           |   |  | (19,525     | ) |  | (12,592     | )
|Amortization                                                                              |  | 916,163    |   |  | 774,353     |   |  | 404,028     |  
|Depreciation                                                                              |  | 5,011,615  |   |  | 4,845,764   |   |  | 4,345,648   |  
|Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment                                         |  | 22,354     |   |  | 167,566     |   |  | 8,477       |  
|Loss on disposal of a callable deposit                                                    |  |           |   |  |            |   |  | 349,599     |  
|Provision for impairment of property, plant and equipment                                 |  |           |   |  | 1,532,345   |   |  | 783,802     |  
|Provision for impairment of license                                                       |  |           |   |  |            |   |  | 1,861,640   |  
|Provision for impairment of patents                                                       |  |           |   |  | 203,828     |   |  |            |  
|Loss on disposal of short-term investments, net                                           |  |           |   |  | 6,567       |   |  | 141,251     |  
|Net provision for (write-back of) accounts receivable                                     |  | (967       | ) |  | 11,756      |   |  |            |  
|Provision for inventory obsolescence                                                      |  | 128,491    |   |  | 3,773,979   |   |  | 1,413,534   |  
|Provision for (reversal of) stock compensation expense on options granted, net            |  | 2,355,319  |   |  | (1,247,061  | ) |  | (233,892    | )
|Issuance of treasury stock in lieu of consultancy fee                                     |  | 57,247     |   |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Deferred tax expense (benefit)                                                            |  | 78,528     |   |  |            |   |  | (104,998    | )
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                                              |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Accounts and bills receivable, net                                                        |  | 257,070    |   |  | 2,784,387   |   |  | (1,251,608  | )
|Prepaid expenses                                                                          |  | (349,983   | ) |  | (42,056     | ) |  | 349,025     |  
|Deposits and other assets                                                                 |  | 533,941    |   |  | 216,287     |   |  | 45,244      |  
|Inventories                                                                               |  | (1,429,836 | ) |  | (9,022,086  | ) |  | 1,862,212   |  
|Legal claims receivable                                                                   |  |           |   |  |            |   |  | (4,577,186  | )
|Promissory note and related interest receivable, net                                      |  | 2,272      |   |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Accounts payable                                                                          |  | (22,713    | ) |  | 127,418     |   |  | (182,757    | )
|Fees payable for land use rights                                                          |  | (181,984   | ) |  | (91,019     | ) |  |            |  
|Salaries and allowances payable                                                           |  | 92,146     |   |  | 53,537      |   |  | (143,259    | )
|Accrued expenses                                                                          |  | 508,995    |   |  | 1,024,380   |   |  | 735,833     |  
|Accrual for contingent losses                                                             |  |           |   |  | 810,000     |   |  | 4,654,134   |  
|Income tax payable                                                                        |  | 25,654     |   |  | (54,888     | ) |  | 31,806      |  
|Exchange adjustments                                                                      |  |           |   |  | (7,372      | ) |  |            |  
|                                                                                          |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities                                       |  | 4,097,947  |   |  | (12,775,139 | ) |  | (743,453    | )
|                                                                                          |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  

(To be continued)



F-9



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 (continued)



|                                                            |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | - |  | ----------- | - |  | ----------- | -
|                                                            |  | 2004        |   |  | 2005        |   |  | 2006        |  
|                                                            |  | US$         |   |  | US$         |   |  | US$         |  
|Cash flows from investing activities:                       |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Decrease in loan to a director                              |  | 76,667      |   |  | 75,183      |   |  | 76,667      |  
|Decrease in promissory note and related interest receivable |  | 161,904     |   |  | 79,017      |   |  |            |  
|Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment     |  |            |   |  | 4,928       |   |  | 45,112      |  
|Purchases of property, plant and equipment                  |  | (3,168,940  | ) |  | (3,547,996  | ) |  | (1,426,271  | )
|Increase in land use rights                                 |  |            |   |  | (364,706    | ) |  | (1,811      | )
|Acquisition of a subsidiary, net of cash acquired           |  |            |   |  | (428        | ) |  |            |  
|Acquisition of minority interests                           |  |            |   |  | (32,053     | ) |  |            |  
|(Increase) decrease in restricted cash                      |  | 431,728     |   |  | (30,899     | ) |  | 430,974     |  
|Decrease (increase) in a callable deposit                   |  | (5,000,000  | ) |  |            |   |  | 4,650,000   |  
|Proceeds from disposal of short-term investments            |  | 73,630,776  |   |  | 109,056,860 |   |  | 78,265,013  |  
|Purchases of short-term investments                         |  | (76,119,942 | ) |  | (98,738,217 | ) |  | (63,062,750 | )
|                                                            |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities         |  | (9,987,807  | ) |  | 6,501,689   |   |  | 18,976,934  |  
|                                                            |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Cash flows from financing activities:                       |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Capital contribution by minority shareholders               |  |            |   |  | 64,106      |   |  |            |  
|Repayment of short-term bank borrowings                     |  |            |   |  | (10,490     | ) |  |            |  
|Repayment of long-term bank borrowings                      |  | (435,407    | ) |  | (373,507    | ) |  |            |  
|Proceeds from stock options exercised                       |  | 118,356     |   |  | 285,685     |   |  |            |  
|                                                            |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Net cash used in financing activities                       |  | (317,051    | ) |  | (34,206     | ) |  |            |  
|                                                            |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents        |  | (6,206,911  | ) |  | (6,307,656  | ) |  | 18,233,481  |  
|                                                            |  |             |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of fiscal year       |  | 21,514,277  |   |  | 15,102,510  |   |  | 8,790,594   |  
|Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash             |  | (204,856    | ) |  | (4,260      | ) |  | 289,671     |  
|                                                            |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of fiscal year             |  | 15,102,510  |   |  | 8,790,594   |   |  | 27,313,746  |  
|                                                            |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Supplemental disclosure information:                        |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Cash paid for interest expense                              |  | 17,589      |   |  | 9,855       |   |  | 55,435      |  
|Cash paid for tax expense                                   |  | 3,585       |   |  | 87,479      |   |  | 77,512      |  
|                                                            |  |             |   |  |             |   |  |             |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements



F-10



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|1 | Organization and principal activities
|- | -------------------------------------

Global-Tech
Appliances Inc. (Global-Tech or the Company) was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and is a holding company, which does not engage in daily business operations other than owning subsidiaries. Global-Tech and its
subsidiaries are hereinafter collectively referred to as the Group. The Group is a designer, manufacturer and marketer of a wide range of consumer electrical products worldwide, including, but not limited to, floor care products and
small household appliances. The Group also continues developing higher-value, more technologically advanced consumer electronic products and components. The Groups manufacturing operation is located in Dongguan, the Peoples Republic of
China (China). The Groups products are sold to customers primarily in the United States (the U.S.).

The
common stock of Global-Tech is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol GAI.



|2 | Subsidiaries
|- | ------------

Details of Global-Techs
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 were as follows:



|                                                    |  |                                       |  |                                  |  |                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Name of subsidiary                                  |  | Place of incorporation/ establishment |  | Percentageof equityinterest held |  | Principal activities                                     
|Global Appliances Holdings Limited                  |  | British Virgin Islands                |  | 100%                             |  | Investment holding                                       
|                                                    |  |                                       | 
|Global Display Holdings Limited                     |  | British Virgin Islands                |  | 100%                             |  | Investment holding                                       
|                                                    |  |                                       | 
|Lite Array Holdings Limited                         |  | British Virgin Islands                |  | 100%                             |  | Investment holding                                       
|                                                    |  |                                       | 
|Kwong Lee Shun Trading Company Limited              |  | Hong Kong                             |  | 100%                             |  | Provision of management services                         
|                                                    |  |                                       | 
|Global Rich Innovation Limited                      |  | Hong Kong                             |  | 100%                             |  | Trading of raw materials and household appliance products
|                                                    |  |                                       | 
|Wing Shing Overseas Limited                         |  | British Virgin Islands                |  | 100%                             |  | Trading of raw materials and household appliance products
|                                                    |  |                                       | 
|Pentalpha Macau Commercial Offshore Limited (PMA) |  | Macau                                 |  | 100%                             |  | Trading of raw materials and household appliance products



F-11



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|2 | Subsidiaries (continued)
|- | ------------------------



|                                                                        |  |                                       |  |                                  |  |                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of subsidiary                                                      |  | Place of incorporation/ establishment |  | Percentageof equityinterest held |  | Principal activities                                                 
|GT Investments (BVI) Limited                                            |  | British Virgin Islands                |  | 100%                             |  | Investment holding                                                   
|Consortium Investment (BVI) Limited                                     |  | British Virgin Islands                |  | 100%                             |  | Assets and investment holding                                        
|Global Optics Limited                                                   |  | Hong Kong                             |  | 100%                             |  | Trading of raw materials and electrical and optical components       
|                                                                        |  |                                       | 
|Dongguan Wing Shing Electrical Products Factory Company Limited (DWS) |  | China                                 |  | 100%                             |  | Manufacturing of household appliance products                        
|                                                                        |  |                                       | 
|Dongguan Lite Array Company Limited                                     |  | China                                 |  | 100%                             |  | Manufacturing of electrical and optical components                   
|                                                                        |  |                                       | 
|Lite Array (OLED) H.K. Limited                                          |  | Hong Kong                             |  | 100%                             |  | Research and development of organic solid state flat-panel displays  
|                                                                        |  |                                       | 
|Global Display Limited                                                  |  | Hong Kong                             |  | 100%                             |  | Development and trading of multimedia flat-panel display products    
|                                                                        |  |                                       | 
|Winway Technology Development Limited                                   |  | Hong Kong                             |  | 83.33%                           |  | Marketing and trading of display products and components in East Asia
|                                                                        |  |                                       | 
|Pentalpha Enterprises Limited                                           |  | Hong Kong                             |  | 100%                             |  | Dormant                                                              
|                                                                        |  |                                       | 
|Pentalpha Hong Kong Limited (Pentalpha)                               |  | Hong Kong                             |  | 100%                             |  | Trading of raw materials and household appliance products            
|                                                                        |  |                                       | 
|Global-Tech USA, Inc.                                                   |  | U.S.                                  |  | 100%                             |  | Provision of investment- related services                            



F-12



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|2 | Subsidiaries (continued)
|- | ------------------------



|                                             |  |                                       |  |                                    |  |                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of subsidiary                           |  | Place of incorporation/ establishment |  | Percentage of equity interest held |  | Principal activities                                                
|MasterWerke Limited (MasterWerke)          |  | U.S.                                  |  | 100%                               |  | Investment holding                                                  
|Dongguan Litewell (OLED) Technology Co., Ltd |  | China                                 |  | 100%                               |  | Manufacturing of OLED equipment                                     
|Wing Shing Products (BVI) Company Limited    |  | British Virgin Islands                |  | 100%                               |  | Dormant                                                             
|Global Lite Array (BVI) Limited (GLA)      |  | British Virgin Islands                |  | 76.75%                             |  | Investment holding                                                  
|Lite Array OLED (BVI) Company Limited        |  | British Virgin Islands                |  | 76.75%                             |  | Trading of raw materials and organic solid state flat-panel displays
|Lite Array, Inc. (LA)                      |  | U.S.                                  |  | 76.75%                             |  | Trading of raw materials and organic solid state flat-panel displays



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies
|- | ------------------------------------------



| | (a) | Statement of compliance and basis of preparation
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------

The consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP).



| | (b) | Basis of consolidation
| | --- | ----------------------

The consolidated financial
statements include the financial statements of Global-Tech and its subsidiaries and all variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Subsidiaries include those majority-owned and controlled domestic and foreign
subsidiaries. Majority-ownership represents more than 50% of the issued voting capital. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.



| | (c) | Use of estimates
| | --- | ----------------

The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.



F-13



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | Cash equivalents
| | --- | ----------------

Cash equivalents consist of
commercial paper and other investments that are readily convertible into cash and have original maturities of three months or less.



| | (e) | Investments
| | --- | -----------

Debt and equity investments in
available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value. Unrealized holding gains or losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale securities are reported in other comprehensive income (losses) and are included in a separate component of
shareholders equity. Realized gains and losses and any declines in fair value judged to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in gain (loss) on disposal and impairment, respectively, in the consolidated
statement of operations. Gains or losses on sale of investments and amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (losses) to earnings are computed based upon specific identification. Interest or dividend income on securities
classified as available-for-sale securities is included in interest income or dividend income, respectively.

When determining whether an
impairment of investments exists or a decline in value of an available-for-sale security is other-than-temporary, the Group evaluates evidence to support a realizable value in excess of the current market price for the security. Such information may
include the investments financial performance (including such factors as earnings trends, dividend payments, asset quality and specific events), the near term prospects of the investment, the current and expected financial condition of the
investments issuer, and the Groups investment intent. A sustained decline in the market value of a quoted security for six months is generally indicative of an other-than-temporary impairment.

The Groups investments in equity investees for which its ownership exceeds 20% or for which the Group owns less than 20% but has the ability to
exercise significant influence, but which are not majority-owned, are accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, the Groups proportionate share of each equity investees net income or loss and amortization of any
identifiable intangibles arising from the investment is included in share of income (losses) in equity investees.

All other
investments for which the Group does not have the ability to exercise significant influence (generally, when the Group has an investment of less than 20% ownership and no representation on the companys board of directors) and for which there
is not a readily determinable fair value, are accounted for using the cost method. Dividends and other distributions of earnings from investees, if any, are included in income when declared. The Group periodically evaluates the carrying value of its
investments accounted for under the cost method of accounting and any impairment is included in the consolidated statement of operations.



F-14



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (f) | Inventories
| | --- | -----------

Inventories are stated at the lower of
cost and market value. Cost, calculated on the weighted average basis, comprises materials and, where applicable, direct labor and an appropriate proportion of production overhead expenditure.



| | (g) | Property, plant and equipment
| | --- | -----------------------------

Property, plant and
equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. The cost of any asset comprises its purchase price and any directly attributable costs of bringing the asset to its working condition and location for
its intended use. Expenditure incurred after an item of property, plant and equipment has been put into operation, such as repairs and maintenance, is normally charged to the consolidated statement of operations in the period in which it is
incurred. In situations where it can be clearly demonstrated that the expenditure has resulted in an increase in the future economic benefit expected to be obtained from the use of an item of property, plant and equipment, the expenditure is
capitalized as an additional cost of that asset. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line basis at annual rates estimated to write off the cost of each asset over its expected useful life. The principal annual rates used for this purpose are
as follows:



|                                  |  |                                                                
|--------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                  |  | Annual rate                                                    
|Leasehold improvements            |  | Over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life
|Buildings                         |  | 4.5%                                                           
|Plant                             |  | 4.5%                                                           
|Machinery                         |  | 10%                                                            
|Molds                             |  | 20% - 33%                                                      
|Transportation equipment          |  | 15% - 20%                                                      
|Furniture, fixtures and equipment |  | 15%                                                            

An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognized upon disposal or when no future economic
benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. The gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset, calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item, is included in the
consolidated statement of operations in the period the item is derecognized.



| | (h) | Construction in progress
| | --- | ------------------------

Construction in progress
represents property, plant and equipment under construction or installation and is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses, and is not depreciated. Cost comprises direct costs of construction, installation and testing during the period
of construction or installation. Construction in progress is reclassified to the appropriate category of property, plant and equipment when completed and ready for use.



F-15



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (i) | Goodwill and intangible assets
| | --- | ------------------------------

Goodwill represents
the excess of cost over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable assets of an acquired business. In accordance with SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit
level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances.

Intangible assets represent a license and patents. Intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses. Amortization is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives
of the respective assets. The estimated useful lives of the intangible assets are as follows:



|        |  |               
|------- |  | --------------
|License |  | 7 years       
|Patents |  | 11 to 20 years

Intangible assets are tested for impairment annually. If the test indicates that amortized
intangible assets may not be recoverable, as determined based on the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the assets use over the remaining amortization period, the carrying value of intangible assets is reduced by the estimated
shortfall in discounted cash flows. Useful lives are also examined on an annual basis and adjustments, where applicable, are made on a prospective basis.



| | (j) | Impairment of long-lived assets
| | --- | -------------------------------

Long-lived assets
(other than goodwill) are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value
of the asset.



| | (k) | Sales and revenue recognition
| | --- | -----------------------------

The Group recognizes
revenues in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104 Revenue Recognition which requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized:
(1) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Net sales represent the
gross invoiced amount, net of discounts and returns, and are recognized when goods are shipped and title has passed.



F-16



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (k) | Sales and revenue recognition (continued)
| | --- | -----------------------------------------

Under
the Groups standard terms and conditions, which are mainly Free On Board shipping point, title and risk of loss are transferred to the customer at the time the product is delivered to the customers freight forwarder. At that time revenue
is recognized unless customer acceptance is uncertain or significant obligations remain.

Deposits or advance payments from customers prior
to delivery and passage of title of merchandise are recorded as receipts in advance.



| | (l) | Advertising costs
| | --- | -----------------

Advertising costs represent
costs relating to promotional activities intended to stimulate, directly or indirectly, a customers purchase of goods, and are charged to the consolidated statement of operations as incurred. Advertising expenses were US$100,698, US$104,811
and US$58,693 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.



| | (m) | Shipping and handling costs
| | --- | ---------------------------

Any shipping, handling
or other costs incurred by the Group associated with the sale of products are included in the Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) line item on the consolidated statement of operations. The primary shipping
expense relates to inland freight from the factory to the port, where title is passed to the customer. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, shipping and handling costs charged to SG&A were US$1,418,367, US$754,247
and US$1,213,390, respectively.

Any inbound freight charges, receiving, inspection, warehousing and internal transfer costs incurred by the
Group are expensed as cost of goods sold. During the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, inbound freight costs charged to cost of goods sold were US$660,656, US$524,337 and US$597,384, respectively. Other related costs are
included in manufacturing overheads.



| | (n) | Foreign currencies
| | --- | ------------------

The functional currency of the
Company is the U.S. dollar. The functional currencies of the Companys subsidiaries in the locations outside the U.S. are either the respective local currencies or the U.S. dollar.

Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in the functional currency using the exchange rates in effect at the date of the transactions.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are remeasured into the functional currency using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Foreign exchange gains or losses are included in the consolidated statement
of operations.



F-17



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (n) | Foreign currencies (continued)
| | --- | ------------------------------

On consolidation,
the financial statements of the subsidiaries are translated into the U.S. dollars, in accordance with SFAS No. 52 Foreign Currency Translation, at rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date for assets and liabilities, and
at the average rates of exchange during the year for income and expense items. Translation differences arising therefrom are credited or charged to the accumulated other comprehensive income (losses) account.



| | (o) | Income taxes
| | --- | ------------

The Group accounts for income taxes
under the provisions of SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial
statements or tax returns. Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method. Under the liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for all temporary differences between the tax and financial statement bases of assets and
liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for loss carry forwards. Valuation allowances are established to the extent that deferred tax assets will more likely than not be unrealized.



| | (p) | Stock compensation expenses
| | --- | ---------------------------

The Group applies the
intrinsic-value-based method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees in accounting for employee stock options. Accordingly, compensation expense is
generally recognized only when options are granted with a discounted exercise price. Any resulting compensation expense is recognized ratably over the associated service period, which is generally the option vesting term.

On May 10, 2000, Global-Tech offered employees a voluntary program to exchange options previously granted at exercise prices ranging from US$8.31 to
US$19.00 for a lower number of options at an exercise price of US$6.25. In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 44 Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25
(FIN44), re-pricing of stock options in any form results in variable accounting. If the exercise price of a stock option is reduced, the modified stock option is accounted for as variable from the date of modification to the date the
award is exercised, is forfeited or expires unexercised.

The Group accounts for stock options granted to a counter-party other than an
employee in accordance with EITF Issue No. 96-18 Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services. Fair value of the equity instruments is
recognized on the measurement date. Measurement date is the date at which (i) a commitment for performance by the counter-party to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the counter-partys performance is completed.



F-18



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (p) | Stock compensation expenses (continued)
| | --- | ---------------------------------------

The Group
has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. The Company has determined pro forma net loss and loss per share information as if the fair value method described in SFAS No.123
had been applied to its employee stock-based compensation. The pro forma effect on net loss and loss per share for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 is as follows:



|                                                                                                                            |  |                      |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | - |  | ----------- | - |  | ----------- | -
|                                                                                                                            |  | Year Ended March 31, |  
|                                                                                                                            |  | 2004                 |   |  | 2005        |   |  | 2006        |  
|                                                                                                                            |  | US$                  |   |  | US$         |   |  | US$         |  
|Net loss, as reported                                                                                                       |  | (3,906,365           | ) |  | (18,623,299 | ) |  | (11,223,394 | )
|                                                                                                                            |  |                      |  
|Add (deduct): Provision for (reversal of) stock compensation expense included in net income (loss) under APB Opinion
No. 25 |  | 2,355,319            |   |  | (1,247,061  | ) |  | (348,162    | )
|                                                                                                                            |  |                      |  
|Deduct: Total stock compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of income tax of US$nil |  | (6,289               | ) |  | (34,261     | ) |  | (574,837    | )
|                                                                                                                            |  |                      |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Pro forma net loss                                                                                                          |  | (1,557,335           | ) |  | (19,904,621 | ) |  | (12,146,393 | )
|                                                                                                                            |  |                      |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Loss per share                                                                                                              |  |                      |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Basic  as reported                                                                                                         |  | (0.32                | ) |  | (1.52       | ) |  | (0.92       | )
|Basic  pro forma                                                                                                           |  | (0.13                | ) |  | (1.63       | ) |  | (0.99       | )
|                                                                                                                            |  |                      |  
|Diluted  as reported                                                                                                       |  | (0.32                | ) |  | (1.52       | ) |  | (0.92       | )
|Diluted  pro forma                                                                                                         |  | (0.13                | ) |  | (1.63       | ) |  | (0.99       | )

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123 (R)), to replace SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and APB No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (Note 3 (y)). The Group will adopt SFAS No. 123(R)
for its annual reporting period beginning on April 1, 2006.



| | (q) | Retirement costs
| | --- | ----------------

Retirement cost contributions
relating to defined contribution plans are made based on a percentage of the employees salaries and are included in the consolidated statement of operations as they become payable.



F-19



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (r) | Operating leases
| | --- | ----------------

Leases where substantially all
the rewards and risks of ownership remain with the lessor are accounted for as operating leases. Payment made under operating leases net of any incentives received from the lessor are charged to the consolidated statement of operations on a
straight-line basis over the period of the relevant leases.

Assets leased out under operating leases are included in property, plant and
equipment in the balance sheet. They are depreciated over the expected useful lives on a basis consistent with similar owned fixed assets. Rental income (net of any incentives given to lessees) is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease
terms.



| | (s) | Earnings (loss) per share
| | --- | -------------------------

Earnings (loss) per
share is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128 Earnings Per Share. Under the provision of SFAS No. 128, basic earnings or loss per share is computed by dividing the net income or loss available to common shareholders for the
year by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings or loss per share is computed by dividing the net income or loss for the year by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding during the year. Common equivalent shares, composed of incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, are included in diluted earnings or loss per share to the extent that such shares are dilutive.



| | (t) | Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------

Accounts receivable are carried at their original invoiced value less an estimate made for uncollectible amounts. The Group does not charge interest on accounts receivable. The Group reviews the aged analysis of accounts receivable on a
regular basis. Allowance for doubtful accounts is made for those amounts overdue for more than one year from the contractual terms or to the extent collection is considered to be doubtful. Whenever it is clear that the amounts are deemed to be
uncollectible, receivables are written off against allowance for doubtful accounts.



| | (u) | Loans receivable
| | --- | ----------------

Loans receivable are stated at
amortized cost less any allowance for loan losses, loan origination fees (net of direct costs), commitment fees and purchase premiums or discounts. Interest on loans is credited to the consolidated statement of operations based on the contractual
terms stipulated in the relevant loan agreement. Premiums are amortized and discounts are accreted over the life of the loans using the effective interest method. Allowance for loan losses is recognized to the consolidated statement of operations to
the extent the collection is considered to be doubtful. Any previously recognized allowance for loan losses is reversed upon settlement of outstanding loans in cash.



F-20



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (v) | Treasury stock
| | --- | --------------

The Group accounts for the acquired
shares of its own capital stock (treasury stock) in accordance with Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43, Chapter 1B and APB Opinion No. 6. The cost of the acquired treasury stock is shown as a deduction from
capital. Gains on sale of treasury stock not previously accounted for as constructively reissued are credited to additional paid-in capital while losses are charged to additional paid-in capital to the extent that previous net gains from the sale or
retirement of the same class of stock are included therein, otherwise to retained earnings.



| | (w) | Comprehensive income (losses)
| | --- | -----------------------------

The Group has
adopted SFAS No. 130 Reporting Comprehensive Income which establishes guidance for the reporting and display of comprehensive income (losses) and its components. The purpose of reporting comprehensive income (losses) is to report a
measure of all changes in equity that resulted from recognized transactions and other economic events of the period other than transactions with shareholders. Total net comprehensive income (loss) includes net earnings or loss as well as additional
other comprehensive income (losses). The Groups other comprehensive income (losses) consists of unrealized gains and loss on available-for-sale securities and foreign currency translation, all recorded net of tax.



| | (x) | Loss contingencies
| | --- | ------------------

The Group provides for costs
related to contingencies when a loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. Although management believes, after consultation with the Groups general counsel, that adequate reserves have been provided for all known contingencies,
the ultimate cost will depend on the resolution of the uncertainties. Therefore, it is possible that additional reserves could be required in the future.



| | (y) | Impact of recently issued accounting standards
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------



| | (i) | In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 151 Inventory Costs  An Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.
SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 Inventory Pricing to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other
provisions, the new rule requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of so abnormal as
stated in ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Group has already commenced an assessment of the impact of the SFAS No. 151 but is not yet in a position to state whether it will have a significant impact on its results of operations and financial
position.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-21



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (y) | Impact of recently issued accounting standards (continued)
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)), to replace SFAS No. 123 Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, and APB No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123(R) requires, among other thing, that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options, be
measured based on their grant-date fair value and recognized as expense in the financial statements. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. The provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) are effective for the annual reporting period that begins
on or after December 15, 2005. During the transition period, the Group accounted for share-based compensation to employees using APB No. 25s intrinsic value method.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Group adopted SFAS No. 123(R) for its accounting period beginning on April 1, 2006 using the modified prospective method. Under the
modified prospective method, compensation expense will be recorded in the financial statements for (i) all awards granted after the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and (ii) future vesting of awards outstanding as of the date of adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R). The Group believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) could have a material impact on the Groups consolidated results of operations and earnings per share.



| | (iii) | In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153 Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets  An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement of nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29 Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions
and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a
result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after June 15, 2005. The Group does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 153 to have a material effect on its results of operations or financial
condition.
| | ----- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-22



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (y) | Impact of recently issued accounting standards (continued)
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------



| | (iv) | In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154 Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 Accounting Changes and SFAS
No. 3 Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and changes the requirements of accounting for, and reporting of, a change in accounting
principle. SFAS No. 154 carries forward many provisions of APB Opinion No. 20 without change, including the provisions related to the reporting of a change in accounting estimate, a change in reporting entity, and the correction of an
error. SFAS No. 154 carries forward the provisions of SFAS No. 3 that govern reporting accounting changes in interim financial statements. It requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements of a voluntary
change in accounting principle unless it is impracticable. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in net income of the period of the change the cumulative effect of
changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 requires that a change in method of depreciation, amortization or depletion for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate that is effected by a
change in accounting principle. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that such a change be reported as a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for accounting changes and corrections of errors made occurring in fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005. The Group is currently in the process of evaluating any
effect the adoption of SFAS No. 154 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (v) | In September 2005, the FASBs EITF reached a final consensus on Issue 04-13 Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty. EITF 04-13
requires that two or more legally separate exchange transactions with the same counterparty be combined and considered a single arrangement for the purposes of applying APB Opinion No. 29 Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,
when the transactions are entered into in contemplation of one another. EITF 04-13 is effective for new arrangements entered into, or modifications or renewals of existing arrangements, in interim or annual periods beginning after March 15,
2006. The Group is evaluating the effect of the adoption of EITF 04-13 but it is not expected to have a material impact on the Groups consolidated financial statements.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-23



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|3 | Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------



| | (y) | Impact of recently issued accounting standards (continued)
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------



| | (vi) | In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments,
which provides guidance on determining when investments in certain debt and equity securities are considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary and on measuring such impairment loss. FSP 115-1 also includes accounting
considerations subsequent to the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. FSP 115-1 is required to be applied to
reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2005. The Group is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of FSP 115-1 but does not expect that it will have a material impact on the Groups consolidated financial statements.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (vii) | In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140. It allows
financial instruments with embedded derivatives that would otherwise require bifurcation from the host to be accounted for as a whole, if the holder irrevocably elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. Subsequent changes in
the fair value of the instrument would be recognized in earnings. The standard also clarifies which interest - only and principal - only strips are not subject to the requirement of SFAS No. 133; establishes a requirement to evaluate interest
in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of
subordination are not embedded derivatives; and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another
derivative financial instrument. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement (new basis) event occurred by a company for the fiscal year that begins on or after September 15, 2006.
The Group is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 155 but it is not expected to have a material impact on the Groups consolidated financial statements.
| | ----- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (viii) | In July 2006, the FASB issued SFAS Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Tax Positions. This interpretation clarifies the application of SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. In addition to recognition, the interpretation provides
guidance on the measurement and derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Group is evaluating the
potential impact of this interpretation on the results of its future operations and financial condition.
| | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-24



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|4 | Cash and cash equivalents
|- | -------------------------



|                                |  |           |  |           
|------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | ----------
|                                |  | 2005      |  | 2006      
|                                |  | US$       |  | US$       
|Cash on hand and at banks       |  | 4,535,984 |  | 20,920,636
|Money market funds              |  | 4,254,610 |  | 6,393,110 
|                                |  |           |  |           
|Total cash and cash equivalents |  | 8,790,594 |  | 27,313,746
|                                |  |           |  |           



|5 | Restricted cash
|- | ---------------

At March 31, 2005, cash of
US$430,974 was pledged to banks as collateral for irrevocable letters of credit of the same amount issued for the purchases of material. No cash was pledged as of March 31, 2006.



|6 | Short-term investments
|- | ----------------------

The following is a summary
of available-for-sale debt and equity securities, which are all non-restricted, as of March 31, 2005 and 2006:



|                  |  |            |  |                           |  |            |   |  |          |  |            |  |           
|----------------- |  | ---------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ---------- | - |  | -------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|                  |  | Cost       |  | Unrealized gains (losses) |  | Fair value
|                  |  | US$ 2005   |  | US$ 2006                  |  | US$2005    |   |  | US$ 2006 |  | US$ 2005   |  | US$ 2006  
|Treasury bills    |  | 28,796,899 |  | 18,635,790                |  | 78,521     |   |  | 73,730   |  | 28,875,420 |  | 18,709,520
|Equity securities |  | 3,124      |  | 3,140                     |  | 3,495      |   |  | 3,022    |  | 6,619      |  | 6,162     
|                  |  |            |  |                           |  |            |   |  |          |  |            |  |           
|                  |  | 28,800,023 |  | 18,638,930                |  | 82,016     |   |  | 76,752   |  | 28,882,039 |  | 18,715,682
|Debt securities   |  | 5,172,720  |  |                          |  | (88,478    | ) |  |         |  | 5,084,242  |  |          
|                  |  |            |  |                           |  |            |   |  |          |  |            |  |           
|                  |  | 33,972,743 |  | 18,638,930                |  | (6,462     | ) |  | 76,752   |  | 33,966,281 |  | 18,715,682
|                  |  |            |  |                           |  |            |   |  |          |  |            |  |           

At March 31, 2006, none of the two types of available-for-sale securities was in an
unrealized loss position. During fiscal 2006, the Group recognized a loss of US$141,251 on the disposal of the debt securities.



F-25



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |   |  |           |   |  |           |   |  | 
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------ | - |  | --------- | - |  | --------- | - |  | 
|6 |  | Short-term investments (continued)  The net unrealized gains (losses) consisted of gross unrealized gains of US$76,752 (2005: US$82,016) and gross unrealized losses of US$nil (2005: US$88,478).
 The proceeds from disposal of short-term investments for the fiscal years ended March 31,
2004, 2005 and 2006 were US$73,630,776, US$109,056,860 and US$78,265,013, respectively.  The gross realized losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities for each of the three fiscal years ended March 31, 2006 are as follows:
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  | 2004   |   |  | 2005      |   |  | 2006      |   |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  | US$    |   |  | US$       |   |  | US$       |   |  | 
|  |  | Gross realized losses                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |  |       |   |  | 6,567     |   |  | 141,251   |   |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |   |  |           |   |  |           |   |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |  
|7 |  | Accounts and bills receivable, net                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  |        |   |  |           |   |  |           |   |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |   |  | 2005      |   |  | 2006      |   |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |   |  | US$       |   |  | US$       |   |  | 
|  |  | Accounts and bills receivable                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |        |   |  | 7,244,764 |   |  | 8,495,217 |   |  | 
|  |  | Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |  |        |   |  | (49,870   | ) |  | (48,715   | ) |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |   |  |           |   |  |           |   |  | 
|  |  | Accounts and bills receivable, net                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  |        |   |  | 7,194,894 |   |  | 8,446,502 |   |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |   |  |           |   |  |           |   |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |  
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  | 2004   |   |  | 2005      |   |  | 2006      |   |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  | US$    |   |  | US$       |   |  | US$       |   |  | 
|  |  | Allowance for doubtful accounts:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |        |   |  |           |   |  |           |   |  | 
|  |  | Balance at beginning of fiscal year                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  | 39,083 |   |  | 38,124    |   |  | 49,870    |   |  | 
|  |  | Additions                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |       |   |  | 12,887    |   |  |          |   |  | 
|  |  | Write-back                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |  | (967   | ) |  | (1,131    | ) |  |          |   |  | 
|  |  | Exchange realignment                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |  | 8      |   |  | (10       | ) |  | (1,155    | ) |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |   |  |           |   |  |           |   |  | 
|  |  | Balance at end of fiscal year                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  | 38,124 |   |  | 49,870    |   |  | 48,715    |   |  | 
|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |        |   |  |           |   |  |           |   |  | 



F-26



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|8 | Inventories
|- | -----------



|                 |  |            |  |           
|---------------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|                 |  | 2005       |  | 2006      
|                 |  | US$        |  | US$       
|Raw materials    |  | 7,683,584  |  | 5,095,208 
|Work-in-progress |  | 4,209,568  |  | 2,471,798 
|Finished goods   |  | 2,163,410  |  | 3,213,810 
|                 |  |            |  |           
|                 |  | 14,056,562 |  | 10,780,816
|                 |  |            |  |           

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, an inventory loss of US$1,413,534 (2004:
US$128,491, 2005: US$3,773,979) in aggregate was recognized in the consolidated statement of operations, of which US$861,776 (2004: US$nil, 2005: US$2,832,809) was to write down certain raw materials, work-in-progress and finished goods to their
respective estimated market values, which were lower than cost.

As at March 31, 2006, the amount of inventories carried at market
value included in the above balance was US$220,502 (2005: US$2,240,587).



|9 | Related party transactions
|- | --------------------------

A related party is any
party that controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the Group to the extent that the Group may be prevented from fully pursuing its own interests. Such parties would include affiliates, investments accounted
for by the equity method, trusts for the benefit of employees, principal shareholders, management, and the immediate family members of shareholders or management.

In addition to the transactions and balances detailed elsewhere in the financial statements for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, the Group incurred annual real estate rental expenses of
approximately US$731,981, US$752,140 and US$755,979 respectively, payable to related companies in which the directors are also the directors of the Company. Included in the aforesaid annual real estate rental expenses were amounts of US$477,088,
US$476,954 and US$479,388 paid to two directors of the Company in the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, which were included in their remuneration for the respective fiscal years as housing allowances.



F-27



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|10 | Loan to a director
|-- | ------------------

In October 1999, the Group made
a loan to an executive employee, who is also a director of the Company, for the purchase of a residence. The loan was in the original principal amount of US$460,000, bearing interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.02% and was secured by a mortgage on
the property. The loan was repayable in six years with an annual installment of US$76,667 of principal together with interest on the unpaid principal balance, commencing from October 2000. Pursuant to the loan agreement, such annual repayments were
forgiven in arrears on each repayment due date in consideration for the executive employees continued employment by the Group. The amount of loan forgiven during the fiscal year was included in directors remuneration and charged to the
consolidated statement of operations. As of March 31, 2005, the loan balance was US$76,667 and the amount was fully settled in fiscal 2006.



|11 | Property, plant and equipment, net
|-- | ----------------------------------



|                                     |  |             |   |  |             |  
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------- | - |  | ----------- | -
|                                     |  | 2005        |   |  | 2006        |  
|                                     |  | US$         |   |  | US$         |  
|Leasehold improvements and buildings |  | 21,170,581  |   |  | 21,278,618  |  
|Plant and machinery                  |  | 22,379,221  |   |  | 22,268,891  |  
|Molds                                |  | 8,345,124   |   |  | 8,499,520   |  
|Transportation equipment             |  | 1,462,532   |   |  | 1,414,770   |  
|Furniture, fixtures and equipment    |  | 4,749,870   |   |  | 4,632,921   |  
|Construction in progress             |  | 81,322      |   |  | 69,824      |  
|                                     |  |             |   |  |             |  
|                                     |  | 58,188,650  |   |  | 58,164,544  |  
|Less: Accumulated depreciation       |  | (30,408,872 | ) |  | (33,999,769 | )
|                                     |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Property, plant and equipment, net   |  | 27,779,778  |   |  | 24,164,775  |  
|                                     |  |             |   |  |             |  



| | (a) | During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, an impairment loss of US$783,802 (2004: US$nil and 2005: US$1,532,345) in aggregate was recognized in the consolidated statement of
operations for certain molds and plant and machinery that are unlikely to generate sufficient future cash flows to support their net book value. The impairment loss recognized during the year was included in the Cost of goods sold and
the SG&A line items on the consolidated statement of operations in the amounts of US$532,217 (2004: US$nil and 2005: US$1,214,115) and US$251,585 (2004: US$nil and 2005: US$318,230), respectively.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | As of March 31, 2005 and 2006, buildings with an aggregate net book value of approximately US$111,969 and US$109,796, respectively, are situated in Hong Kong and held under
leases expiring in 2044, and manufacturing facilities with an aggregate net book value of approximately US$14,885,679 and US$14,007,529 as of March 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively, are situated in Mainland China. The land where the
manufacturing facilities are situated is held under land use rights that expire in 2043. The Group has not yet obtained ownership certificates for all of the manufacturing facility premises as of March 31, 2006 but the ownership certificate for
a substantial portion of the land use rights was obtained during fiscal 2006 (Note 12).
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | The amount of depreciation charged for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 was US$5,011,615, US$4,845,764 and US$4,345,648, respectively.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | The loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment recognized during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 amounted to US$8,477 (2004: US$22,354, 2005: US$167,566).
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-28



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|12 | Land use rights, net
|-- | --------------------

Land use rights represent
operating lease expenses on land use for a predetermined time period which are payable in advance. They are charged to the consolidated statement of operations over the lease periods on a straight-line basis. The Group has obtained land use rights
certificates covering a substantial portion of the land. Subsequent to the balance sheet date, the Group has entered into a supplementary agreement with the Dongguan local government regarding the use of a 45,208 square meter portion of land which
the Group has occupied. The Group has transferred a portion of this land of 13,698 square meters in aggregate, which was previously used as a recreational area, to the Dongguan local government. No cost or liability has been recognized in the
consolidated financial statements as a result of this transfer as the amount cannot be reasonably estimated. Additionally, the Group has acquired the rights to use the remaining portion of land of 31,510 square meters until August 6, 2043, on
which the Group had already built dormitories for workers. The Group expects to obtain the certificate by the end of 2006. The application for the building ownership certificate will commence only after the land use right certificate for the
remaining portion of land has been obtained.



|13 | License, net
|-- | ------------



|                                         |  |         |  |            |   |  |        
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ---------- | - |  | -------
|                                         |  |         |  | 2005       |   |  | 2006   
|                                         |  |         |  | US$        |   |  | US$    
|At cost                                  |  |         |  | 4,866,389  |   |  |       
|Less: Accumulated amortization           |  |         |  | (2,665,265 | ) |  |       
|                                         |  |         |  |            |   |  |        
|License, net                             |  |         |  | 2,201,124  |   |  |       
|                                         |  |         |  |            |   |  |        
|                                         |  |         | 
|                                         |  | 2004    |  | 2005       |   |  | 2006   
|                                         |  | US$     |  | US$        |   |  | US$    
|Amortization expense for the fiscal year |  | 695,395 |  | 695,867    |   |  | 350,717
|                                         |  |         |  |            |   |  |        

The cost of the license represented the appraised fair value of the license on the date of
acquisition of LA. Pursuant to the license arrangement, LA had to pay royalties of (i) a fixed percentage of the net sales of products which were produced by using the licensed know-how sold by LA and its subsidiaries before January 1,
2004, and (ii) the greater of a fixed amount and a fixed percentage of the net sales of products, which were produced by using the licensed know-how, sold by LA and its subsidiaries after January 1, 2004. The Group could terminate the
license agreement at any time from January 1, 2004 to its expiration in 2023.

By letter dated September 20, 2005, licensor served
notice that it terminated the license agreement based upon the failure of LA to pay certain minimum royalties, subject to the right of LA to cure the claimed default within 60 days. By letter dated November 14, 2005, LA notified the licensor
that it had rescinded the license agreement based upon misrepresentations that the licensor made to induce LA to enter into the license agreement and demanded the return of US$3.85 million LA has paid to the licensor under the license agreement. Up
to the date of this report, neither party has filed any legal action with respect to this dispute but the Group has ceased using any intellectual property related to the license agreement owned by the licensor.

The Group has recognized an impairment loss of US$1,816,640 in the SG&A line item of the consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2006 in respect of the rescinded license agreement.



F-29



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|14 | Investment in an equity investee
|-- | --------------------------------

In January 2005,
MasterWerke entered into a joint venture agreement with a third-party venture capital company to form and operate a new entity, Global Commercial Products LLC, which is incorporated in the U.S. as a 50/50 joint venture, for the purpose of
(i) utilizing an owned operating companys customer relationships and intellectual property and proprietary know-how and the Groups manufacturing facilities to develop and manufacture the products that both parties agree upon from
time to time, and (ii) selling such products in the U.S. and elsewhere throughout the world through the joint venture entity. As of March 31, 2006, the joint venture entity had not commenced any operations nor had any paid-up capital.



|15 | Short-term bank borrowings
|-- | --------------------------



|                      |  |        |  |       
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------
|                      |  | 2005   |  | 2006  
|                      |  | US$    |  | US$   
|Short-term bank loans |  | 37,507 |  | 37,698
|                      |  |        |  |       

Short-term bank borrowings drawn for working capital purposes are denominated in U.S. dollars and
bear interest at a rate of 13.99% (2005: 13.99%) per annum.

As of March 31, 2005 and 2006, the Group had banking facilities
denominated in Hong Kong dollars of approximately HK$131,330,000 (equivalent to US$16,838,259) and HK$32,000,000 (equivalent to US$4,123,764), respectively, in aggregate for overdrafts, bank loans, guarantees and letters of credit. There has been no
utilization of banking facilities denominated in Hong Kong dollars as of March 31, 2006. The amount of banking facilities denominated in US dollars and utilized as at the balance sheet date are summarized as follows:



|           |  |        |  |       
|---------- |  | ------ |  | ------
|           |  | 2005   |  | 2006  
|           |  | US$    |  | US$   
|Bank loans |  | 37,507 |  | 37,698
|           |  |        |  |       

The Company has provided the banks with an unlimited corporate guarantee for the general banking
facilities granted to the Group and an undertaking not to pledge, mortgage or charge, any of the assets in Hong Kong or Mainland China.



|16 | Business combination
|-- | --------------------

Effective April 30,
2004, a subsidiary of the Company acquired all the shares of MasterWerke, a U.S. corporation wholly owned by the spouse of a director of the Company, for a cash consideration of US$1,000 for the purpose of recovering the promissory note and related
interest receivable due from MasterWerke, as well as using MasterWerke for other business purposes.

Details of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition are as follows:



|                                                  |  |          |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | -------- | -
|                                                  |  | 2005     |  
|                                                  |  | US$      |  
|Fair value of assets and liabilities acquired:    |  |          |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                         |  | 572      |  
|Short-term investments                            |  | 473,500  |  
|Subscription receivable                           |  | 1,000    |  
|Promissory note and interest payable to the Group |  | (474,072 | )
|                                                  |  |          |  
|                                                  |  | 1,000    |  
|                                                  |  |          |  
|Satisfied by:                                     |  |          |  
|Cash consideration                                |  | 1,000    |  
|                                                  |  |          |  



F-30



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|16 | Business combination (continued)
|-- | --------------------------------



|                                                                                            |  |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------ | -
|                                                                                            |  | 2005   |  
|                                                                                            |  | US$    |  
|Net cash outflow from the acquisition of a subsidiary:                                      |  |        |  
|                                                                                            | 
|Cash consideration paid                                                                     |  | (1,000 | )
|Cash and cash equivalents acquired                                                          |  | 572    |  
|                                                                                            |  |        |  
|Net cash outflow of cash and cash equivalents in respect of the acquisition of a subsidiary |  | (428   | )
|                                                                                            |  |        |  

Had the results of operations for the Group included MasterWerke since April 1, 2004, the
Groups pro forma revenue, net loss and net loss per common share for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 would have been as follows:



|                                    |  |                 |  |                
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ---------------
|                                    |  | (Unaudited)2004 |  | (Unaudited)2005
|                                    |  | US$             |  | US$            
|Pro forma net sales                 |  | 66,901,315      |  | 41,851,163     
|                                    |  |                 |  |                
|Pro forma net loss                  |  | 3,953,329       |  | 18,653,557     
|                                    |  |                 |  |                
|Pro forma net loss per common share |  | 0.33            |  | 1.53           
|                                    |  |                 |  |                

Starting from May 1, 2004, the results of MasterWerke have been included in the Groups
consolidated statement of operations.



|17 | Share capital
|-- | -------------

During the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2004, the Company reissued 10,000 shares of treasury stock to two independent consultants in August 2003.

During the fiscal
years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, no treasury stock was reissued by the Company.



F-31



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|18 | Other income (expenses), net
|-- | ----------------------------



|                                                |  |         |  |         |   |  |          |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ------- | - |  | -------- | -
|                                                |  | 2004    |  | 2005    |   |  | 2006     |  
|                                                |  | US$     |  | US$     |   |  | US$      |  
|Exchange gains (losses), net                    |  | 317,468 |  | (72,639 | ) |  | (370,485 | )
|Loss on disposal of a callable deposit          |  |        |  |        |   |  | (349,599 | )
|Loss on disposal of short-term investments, net |  |        |  | (6,567  | ) |  | (141,251 | )
|Loss on disposal of floating rate bank notes    |  |        |  |        |   |  | (61,229  | )
|Others, net                                     |  | 110,346 |  | 110,795 |   |  | 76,549   |  
|                                                |  |         |  |         |   |  |          |  
|                                                |  | 427,814 |  | 31,589  |   |  | (846,015 | )
|                                                |  |         |  |         |   |  |          |  



|19 | Income taxes
|-- | ------------

Global-Tech and its subsidiaries are
subject to income taxes on an entity basis on the income arising in or derived from the tax jurisdictions in which they are domiciled or deemed to operate.

The Company is subject to various tax rates, according to the jurisdictions in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate. The Hong Kong income tax rate is 17.5% (2004 and 2005: 17.5%). The subsidiary operating in
Macau is exempted from Macau Complementary Tax.

The subsidiaries established in China, DWS and DGLAD, are subject to income tax at a rate
of 27% (24% reduced tax rate and 3% local income tax rate, in the open coastal areas of China). Current income tax is computed based on the taxable income as reported in the statutory financial statements prepared under China accounting regulations.
DGLAD is eligible for a consecutive five-year holiday period whereby DGLAD will be 100% exempt from China income tax for two years and a 50% exemption for three years. The holiday period will commence from DGLADs first year of assessable
profit (i.e. after utilizing any available accumulated tax loss carried forward). As of March 31, 2006, the tax holiday period had not commenced, as DGLAD has not recognized its first year of assessable profit.



|                           |  |         |  |        |  |          |  
|-------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ------ |  | -------- | -
|                           |  | 2004    |  | 2005   |  | 2006     |  
|                           |  | US$     |  | US$    |  | US$      |  
|Income taxes:              |  |         |  |        |  |          |  
|Current                    |  | 29,239  |  | 33,650 |  | 82,000   |  
|Deferred                   |  | 78,528  |  |       |  | (104,998 | )
|                           |  |         |  |        |  |          |  
|Provision for income taxes |  | 107,767 |  | 33,650 |  | (22,998  | )
|                           |  |         |  |        |  |          |  

The reconciliation of the Hong Kong income tax rate to the effective income tax rate based on the
loss from operations before income taxes as stated in the consolidated statement of operations is as follows:



|                                                           |  |       |    |  |       |    |  |       |   
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- | -- |  | ----- | -- |  | ----- | --
|                                                           |  | 2004  |    |  | 2005  |    |  | 2006  |   
|Hong Kong income tax rate                                  |  | 17.5  | %  |  | 17.5  | %  |  | 17.5  | % 
|Non-taxable income (loss) arising from offshore activities |  | 7.3   | %  |  | (23.4 | )% |  | (36.0 | )%
|Non-taxable interest income                                |  | 5.4   | %  |  | (1.5  | )% |  | (3.3  | )%
|Non-tax deductible expenses                                |  | (19.0 | )% |  | (0.2  | )% |  | 11.2  | % 
|Changes in valuation allowance                             |  | (13.9 | )% |  | 7.4   | %  |  | 10.8  | % 
|Changes in tax rate                                        |  | (0.1  | )% |  |      |    |  |      |   
|                                                           |  |       |    |  |       |    |  |       |   
|Effective income tax rate                                  |  | (2.8  | )% |  | (0.2  | )% |  | 0.2   | % 
|                                                           |  |       |    |  |       |    |  |       |   

F-32



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|19 | Income taxes (continued)
|-- | ------------------------

Deferred income taxes as
of March 31, 2005 and 2006 comprised the following temporary differences:



|                                              |  |            |   |  |            |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | - |  | ---------- | -
|                                              |  | 2005       |   |  | 2006       |  
|                                              |  | US$        |   |  | US$        |  
|Deferred tax assets:                          |  |            |   |  |            |  
|License                                       |  | 171,834    |   |  |           |  
|Impairment of property, plant and equipment   |  | 330,083    |   |  | 143,699    |  
|Provision for inventories                     |  | 805,782    |   |  | 326,425    |  
|Operating losses carried forward              |  | 4,539,713  |   |  | 7,021,889  |  
|                                              |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Gross deferred tax assets                     |  | 5,847,412  |   |  | 7,492,013  |  
|Less: Valuation allowance                     |  | (5,795,634 | ) |  | (7,468,912 | )
|                                              |  |            |   |  |            |  
|                                              |  | 51,778     |   |  | 23,101     |  
|Gross deferred tax liabilities:               |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |  | (194,666   | ) |  | (61,720    | )
|                                              |  |            |   |  |            |  
|Net deferred tax liabilities                  |  | (142,888   | ) |  | (38,619    | )
|                                              |  |            |   |  |            |  

The Group provided non-current deferred tax liabilities of US$38,619 (2005: US$142,888) as of
March 31, 2006, which arose from the temporary difference on depreciation of property, plant and equipment.



|                                    |  |           |  |           |  |          
|----------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | --------- |  | ---------
|                                    |  | 2004      |  | 2005      |  | 2006     
|                                    |  | US$       |  | US$       |  | US$      
|Valuation allowance:                |  |           |  |           |  |          
|Balance at beginning of fiscal year |  | 269,135   |  | 1,557,987 |  | 5,795,634
|Additions                           |  | 1,288,852 |  | 4,237,647 |  | 1,673,278
|                                    |  |           |  |           |  |          
|Balance at end of fiscal year       |  | 1,557,987 |  | 5,795,634 |  | 7,468,912
|                                    |  |           |  |           |  |          

The Group established valuation allowances, by tax jurisdiction, for deferred tax assets,
including tax losses carried forward that management believes are not more likely than not realizable. As of March 31, 2006, the Group had tax losses carried forward of US$7,021,889. The losses may be carried forward for 15 years up to an
indefinite period, based on tax jurisdiction. Certain of the losses carried forward begin expiring in 2012.

During the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2005, the Inland Revenue Department of Hong Kong requested information from one of the Companys subsidiaries regarding its relationship with another subsidiary of the Company. The Group has responded to the Inland Revenue
Department request. Management has considered the need for contingent income tax liabilities and provided for such liabilities it believes are probable.



F-33



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|20 | Basic and diluted loss per share
|-- | --------------------------------

Earnings or loss
per common share is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128 Earnings Per Share, by dividing the net income or loss for the year by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:



|                                                 |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------- | - |  | ----------- | - |  | ----------- | -
|                                                 |  | 2004       |   |  | 2005        |   |  | 2006        |  
|                                                 |  | US$        |   |  | US$         |   |  | US$         |  
|Numerator for basic and diluted loss per share:  |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Net loss attributable to common shareholders     |  | (3,906,365 | ) |  | (18,623,299 | ) |  | (11,223,394 | )
|                                                 |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|                                                 |  | Number     |   |  | Number      |   |  | Number      |  
|Denominator for basic and diluted loss per share |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Weighted average number of shares                |  | 12,152,592 |   |  | 12,214,800  |   |  | 12,223,608  |  
|                                                 |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|                                                 |  | US$        |   |  | US$         |   |  | US$         |  
|Basic and diluted loss per share:                |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  
|Net loss attributable to common shareholders     |  | (0.32      | ) |  | (1.52       | ) |  | (0.92       | )
|                                                 |  |            |   |  |             |   |  |             |  

1,126,808, 1,385,095 and 1,086,067 outstanding stock options of the Company during the fiscal
years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, had exercise prices below the respective weighted average share prices of the Company during these years, resulting in 210,426, 390,098 and 772,159 incremental common shares,
respectively, for the purpose of the diluted loss per share calculation. The effect of the Companys dilutive stock options was not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for the years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006
because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.



F-34



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|21 | Design and development costs
|-- | ----------------------------

The Group expenses
all research and development costs when incurred. Included in SG&A line item in the consolidated statement of operations were design and development costs of US$2,322,938, US$2,523,732 and US$1,708,872 for the fiscal years ended March 31,
2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.



|22 | Commitments
|-- | -----------



| | (a) | Capital commitments
| | --- | -------------------

As of March 31, 2006, the Group
had capital commitments of US$31,484 (2005: US$116,494) for the purchase of property, plant and equipment.



| | (b) | Operating lease commitments
| | --- | ---------------------------

In addition to the land use
rights described in Note 12, the Group has entered into various operating lease agreements for parking lots, motor vehicles, equipment and real estate that extend through to 2008. The Group recorded rental expenses excluding the land use rights
described in Note 12 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 of US$700,491, US$661,676 and US$628,826, respectively, and recorded sublease income of US$28,877 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (2004: US$nil and
2005: US$9,577). The operating lease expenses for the land use rights described in Note 12 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 were US$50,988, US$59,376 and US$53,311, respectively. Future minimum rental payments as of
March 31, 2006 were as follows:



|                                              |  |           |  |        
|--------------------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | -------
|                                              |  | 2005      |  | 2006   
|                                              |  | US$       |  | US$    
|Payable:                                      |  |           |  |        
|Within one year                               |  | 491,288   |  | 163,675
|Over one year but not exceeding two years     |  | 241,332   |  | 121,284
|Over two years but not exceeding three years  |  | 219,089   |  |       
|Over three years but not exceeding four years |  | 116,402   |  |       
|                                              |  |           |  |        
|                                              |  | 1,068,111 |  | 284,959
|                                              |  |           |  |        



| | (c) | Purchase commitments
| | --- | --------------------

As of March 31, 2005, the Group
had purchase obligations of US$430,974 for the purchase of raw materials under irrecoverable letters of credit, which were supported by restricted cash of the same amount as described in Note 5. Such raw materials were subsequently received. As of
March 31, 2006, the Group had no purchase obligations for the purchase of raw materials under irrecoverable letters of credit.



F-35



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|23 | Contingent liabilities
|-- | ----------------------



| | (a) | The Group is involved in patent infringement and breach of contract litigation with Sunbeam Corporation and Sunbeam Products, Inc. (collectively Sunbeam), with both
parties claiming and counter-claiming. The trial on the claims of Sunbeam for indemnity and the claim of the Group for breach of contract began on January 12, 2004. On January 16, 2004, the jury returned a verdict in favor of
(i) Sunbeam on its claim for indemnity and awarded Sunbeam US$2.5 million against one of the Companys subsidiaries and (ii) the Group on its claim for breach of contract and awarded the Group US$6.6 million. The District Court gave a
final judgment on February 11, 2004 to add prejudgment interest to the Jurys award, and awarded Sunbeam US$3.4 million and the Group US$6.6 million. The Group filed a motion to reconsider the calculation of the prejudgment interest, which
the Court denied. Sunbeam moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and has moved for a new trial. Sunbeam argued, among other things, that the Group should be denied any recovery, or alternatively that any recovery by the Group should be
limited to US$1 million.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The District Court denied these motions by an order given on April 12, 2004. On May 10,
2004, Sunbeam filed an appeal against the final judgment, and the Group cross-appealed on May 21, 2005. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit heard oral arguments on the appeals on March 1, 2005.

On August 12, 2005, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court to the extent that Sunbeam appealed
from it and to the extent that Global-Tech and its subsidiary appealed from it, except that the Court of Appeals remanded the case to the District Court for a recalculation of the Groups prejudgment interest on its verdict for US$6.6 million
from June 30, 2001, the last date of the relevant product supply agreement. The mandate of the Court of Appeals was issued on September 12, 2005. The time for Sunbeam to petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court has
expired.

The Group moved in the District Court for an amended judgment to fix the amount of interest to which it was entitled. Sunbeam
opposed the motion on the ground that the Group had not properly calculated the interest to which it is entitled. By the amended judgment dated December 12, 2005, the District Court awarded the Group prejudgment interest from June 30, 2001
to February 11, 2004, bringing the judgment entered in favor of the Group as of February 11, 2004 to US$8 million and leaving unchanged the judgment entered against the Group in favor of Sunbeam.

On December 23, 2005, the Group filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The Group filed its brief on
January 25, 2006, arguing that the district erred in failing to award it prejudgment interest until the final amended judgment on December 12, 2005. The appeal has been fully briefed and is scheduled for oral argument in the Court of
Appeals on November 15, 2006.

Sunbeam has posted a bond in the amount of US$5.2 million, which is attached pursuant to the
September 7, 2005 order of the District Court in the action SEB S.A., v. Montgomery Ward et al., pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.



F-36



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|23 | Contingent liabilities (continued)
|-- | ----------------------------------



| | (a) | (continued)
| | --- | -----------

Since the judgment is final and no further
appeal is available to Sunbeam, the Groups right to collect the judgment from Sunbeam, or on the bond from the insurance company, is certain even though the judgment is attached by SEB S.A. (SEB). Management recognized a gain of
US$8.0 million from its claim against Sunbeam for breach of contract and a loss of US$3.4 million on the claims of Sunbeam for indemnity in its consolidated statement of operation during fiscal 2006.



| | (b) | SEB commenced an action in 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for patent infringement against the Company and Pentalpha Enterprises, and
Montgomery Ward et al., which filed for bankruptcy protection subsequently. SEB also moved for an order attaching the judgment in favor of the Company in the action SEB v. Sunbeam v. Pentalpha Enterprises mentioned in (a) above. The
Court then attached the entire judgment by order dated September 7, 2005. The district court conducted a trial beginning on April 17, 2006. On April 21, 2006, the jury returned a verdict finding that the Company had infringed the SEB
patent, that the infringement was willful and that SEB was entitled to a reasonable royalty in the total amount of US$4.6 million.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Both sides have made post-trial motions. The Group has moved for judgment as a matter of law on a wide range of issues, and for a new trial. SEB has moved to enhance the judgment with the addition of treble damages, prejudgment interest and
attorneys fees. The motions have not been fully briefed and are scheduled for oral argument in September, 2006. The conference was adjourned on September 26, 2006 until further notice from the District Court and their outcome is uncertain
and the district court has not entered any judgment based upon the jury verdict. Accordingly, the amount of the judgment as well as the timing of its entry are uncertain.

However, based on SFAS No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies, management has accrued the contingent loss of US$4.6 million in its consolidated statement of operations during fiscal 2006.



| | (c) | On October 11, 2004, Best Hero Limited (Best Hero) issued a writ in the Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong against a subsidiary of the Company
for a payment of US$4,250,400. The claim relates to two purchase orders issued by the subsidiary on May 31, 2004 and June 1, 2004, respectively, to Best Hero for the purchase of LCD TV panels for a total purchase price of US$4,620,000.
However, the LCD TV panels which were paid for in the initial shipment was determined to be unacceptable. Accordingly, further delivery of the remaining orders was refused. Best Hero alleged that the subsidiary has repudiated the contract and
instituted legal proceedings to claim for damages. The subsidiary intends to defend the action on the grounds that it is justified in rejecting the goods for breach of conditions as to descriptions and the sample provided to the subsidiary by Best
Hero. A defence and counter-claim was filed by the subsidiary in the High Court on December 28, 2004. Best Hero filed a Reply and Defence to Counterclaim on January 11, 2005. The action is currently proceeding to discovery.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An unfavorable decision in the outcome of the case would create a liability for the subsidiary to pay Best Hero, depending on
the outcome, the amount may be:



| | (i) | the deficiency in price between the contractual price (US$4,620,000) and the price at which the LCD TV panels were actually sold by Best Hero (this is still unknown) together with
interest and legal costs, etc; or
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | if Best Hero has not sold the LCD TV panels, the full contractual price together with interest and legal costs but the subsidiary would receive the LCD TV panels in this
circumstance.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The subsidiary expects to prevail in the case, but the Group has accrued for a loss contingency in respect to
this litigation in the consolidated balance sheets as at March 31, 2005 and 2006 in an amount substantially less than the claim of US$4,250,400 made against the subsidiary but representing managements best estimate of the most likely
outcome from this litigation.



F-37



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|23 | Contingent liabilities (continued)
|-- | ----------------------------------



| | (d) | On February 23, 2001, Sunbeam commenced an adversary proceeding against Wing Shing Products (BVI) Company Limited (Wing Shing Products), asserted that Sunbeam owned
U.S. Patent No. Des. 348,585 or had a permanent license to use it. On March 12, 2001, the subsidiary asserted a counterclaim against Sunbeam for infringement of the Design Patent. On August 24, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit affirmed the US$2,304,403 judgment that the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York had entered on March 15, 2004, in favor of Wing Shing Products. The Court of Appeals cased its mandate on
September 14, 2005 for Sunbeam to file a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. On January 9, 2006, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition of Sunbeam for a writ of certiorari. On or about
January 12, 2006, Sunbeam wire transferred US$2,353, 581 to Wing Shing Products. Wing Shing Products recorded such receipt in other operating income (loss) during fiscal 2006.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|24 | Employee benefits
|-- | -----------------

The Group operates a Mandatory
Provident Fund (MPF) scheme and an Occupational Retirement Schemes Ordinance (ORSO) scheme for all its qualified employees in Hong Kong. Both the MPF and the ORSO schemes are defined contribution schemes and are administered
by independent trustees.

MPF is available to all employees aged 18 to 64 and with at least 60 days of service as an employee of the Group
in Hong Kong. Under the MPF scheme, both the Group and employee contributes the lower of 5% of the employees basic salary and HK$1,000, subject to a cap of a monthly basic salary of HK$20,000. Employees are entitled to 100% of the Groups
contributions together with accrued returns irrespective of their length of service with the Group, but the benefits are required by law to be preserved until the retirement age of 65. Certain full-time employees in Hong Kong who joined the Group
before December 2000 are eligible to participate in the ORSO scheme immediately following the date on which they have completed their probationary period. Under the ORSO scheme, both the Group and the employee contributes 5% of the employees
basic salary.

The costs of these schemes recognized during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 were US$170,622,
US$207,194 and US$176,334, respectively.

According to the relevant laws and regulations in China, the Group is required to contribute 10%
of the stipulated salary set by the local government of Dongguan, China, to the retirement schemes to fund the benefits of their employees. No forfeited contributions may be used by the employer to reduce the existing level of contributions.
Additionally, the Group provides housing, medical care and subsidized meals to all factory employees. The aggregate amounts incurred by the Group for all such benefits were US$642,707, US$628,165 and US$758,737 during the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.



F-38



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|25 | Segment information
|-- | -------------------

The Group is principally
engaged in one reportable segment of manufacturing and trading of consumer electrical products.



| | (a) | Net sales by geographic area
| | --- | ----------------------------



|              |  |            |  |            |  |           
|------------- |  | ---------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|              |  | 2004       |  | 2005       |  | 2006      
|              |  | US$        |  | US$        |  | US$       
|Australia     |  | 486,377    |  | 533,334    |  | 438,303   
|Europe        |  | 4,461,180  |  | 2,982,909  |  | 8,316,484 
|North America |  | 56,116,363 |  | 35,995,612 |  | 54,438,145
|Asia          |  | 5,720,742  |  | 2,219,058  |  | 10,438,473
|Other regions |  | 116,653    |  | 120,250    |  | 180,695   
|              |  |            |  |            |  |           
|              |  | 66,901,315 |  | 41,851,163 |  | 73,812,100
|              |  |            |  |            |  |           



| | (b) | Net sales by product type
| | --- | -------------------------



|                             |  |            |  |            |  |           
|---------------------------- |  | ---------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|                             |  | 2004       |  | 2005       |  | 2006      
|                             |  | US$        |  | US$        |  | US$       
|Floor care products          |  | 49,734,017 |  | 29,623,372 |  | 54,570,730
|Kitchen appliances           |  | 12,044,008 |  | 7,628,507  |  | 7,315,672 
|CMOS camera modules (CCMs) |  |           |  |           |  | 5,917,146 
|Others                       |  | 5,123,290  |  | 4,599,284  |  | 6,008,552 
|                             |  |            |  |            |  |           
|                             |  | 66,901,315 |  | 41,851,163 |  | 73,812,100
|                             |  |            |  |            |  |           



| | (c) | Long-lived assets*
| | --- | ------------------



|                         |  |            |  |            |  |           
|------------------------ |  | ---------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|                         |  | 2004       |  | 2005       |  | 2006      
|                         |  | US$        |  | US$        |  | US$       
|Hong Kong and Macau      |  | 2,114,345  |  | 2,078,941  |  | 1,110,392 
|Mainland China           |  | 30,563,694 |  | 27,892,596 |  | 25,204,420
|United States of America |  |           |  |           |  | 1,407     
|                         |  |            |  |            |  |           
|                         |  | 32,678,039 |  | 29,971,537 |  | 26,316,219
|                         |  |            |  |            |  |           

---

|* | Long-lived assets represent land use rights, and property, plant and equipment.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-39



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|25 | Segment information (continued)
|-- | -------------------------------



| | (d) | Major customers
| | --- | ---------------

Customers accounting for 10% or more of
the Groups sales are as follows:



|                                                                  |  |            |  |            |  |           
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|                                                                  |  | 2004       |  | 2005       |  | 2006      
|                                                                  |  | US$        |  | US$        |  | US$       
|Royal Appliance Manufacturing Company Limited (Royal Appliance) |  | 32,357,447 |  | 26,222,845 |  | 29,851,569
|The Electrolux Group (previously known as The Eureka Company)   |  | 17,459,514 |  | 4,311,752  |  | 25,133,617
|                                                                  |  |            |  |            |  |           

During the year ended March 31, 2006, 40% (2005: 63%) of total net sales and 39% (2005: 56%)
of total accounts receivable were from Royal Appliance, which is an unrelated customer. The Group is a contract manufacturer of vacuum cleaners that are marketed by Royal Appliance under its brand names.

Royal Appliance has no purchase commitment to the Group for the continuous manufacturing of its products.



|26 | Risk considerations
|-- | -------------------

The Groups operations
are mainly conducted in Hong Kong, Macau and Mainland China. As a result, the Groups business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in Hong Kong, Macau and Mainland
China, and by the general state of the Hong Kong, Macau and Mainland China economies.

As substantially all of the Groups
manufacturing operations are conducted in Mainland China and over 90% of the net book value of the Groups total long-lived assets are situated in Mainland China, the Group is subject to different considerations and risks not typically
associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among others, the political, economic and legal environments and foreign currency exchange. The Groups results may be adversely affected by
changes in the political and social conditions in Mainland China, and by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation
among other things.



F-40



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|27 | Financial instruments
|-- | ---------------------

The Groups financial
instruments that are subjected to credit risks are limited to its cash and cash equivalents, investments and accounts receivable.

The
Groups financial assets and liabilities are recognized initially at cost which is the fair value of the consideration given (in the case of assets) or received (in the case of liabilities). Transaction costs (debt issuance costs) are included
in the initial measurement of all financial assets and liabilities, except for financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss. Subsequent to initial recognition, assets and liabilities are either valued at amortized cost using
the effective interest rate method or at fair value, depending on classification.

The following table sets forth the carrying values and
estimated fair values of the Groups financial assets and liabilities recognized as at March 31, 2005 and 2006. There were no material unrecognized financial assets and liabilities as at March 31, 2005 and 2006.



|                                   |  |                |  |            |  |            |  |           
|---------------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | ---------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------
|                                   |  | Carrying value |  | Fair value
|                                   |  | US$ 2005       |  | US$ 2006   |  | US$ 2005   |  | US$ 2006  
|Current financial assets:          |  |                |  |            |  |            |  |           
|Cash and cash equivalents          |  | 8,790,594      |  | 27,313,746 |  | 8,790,594  |  | 27,313,746
|Restricted cash                    |  | 430,974        |  |           |  | 430,974    |  |          
|Callable deposit                   |  | 5,000,000      |  |           |  | 5,000,000  |  |          
|Short-term investments             |  | 33,966,281     |  | 18,715,682 |  | 33,966,281 |  | 18,715,682
|Accounts and bills receivable, net |  | 7,194,894      |  | 8,446,502  |  | 7,194,894  |  | 8,446,502 
|                                   |  |                |  |            |  |            |  |           
|Total financial assets             |  | 55,382,743     |  | 54,475,930 |  | 55,382,743 |  | 54,475,930
|                                   |  |                |  |            |  |            |  |           
|                                   |  |               
|                                   |  | Carrying value |  | Fair value
|                                   |  | US$ 2005       |  | US$ 2006   |  | US$ 2005   |  | US$ 2006  
|Current financial liabilities:     |  |                |  |            |  |            |  |           
|Short-term bank borrowings         |  | 37,507         |  | 37,698     |  | 37,507     |  | 37,698    
|Accounts payable                   |  | 5,258,005      |  | 5,075,248  |  | 5,258,005  |  | 5,075,248 
|                                   |  |                |  |            |  |            |  |           
|Total financial liabilities        |  | 5,295,512      |  | 5,112,946  |  | 5,295,512  |  | 5,112,946 
|                                   |  |                |  |            |  |            |  |           

The carrying amounts of the Groups cash and cash equivalents, accounts and bills receivable
and accounts payable approximate to their fair values because of their short maturities. The carrying amounts of the Groups bank loans approximate to their fair values based on borrowing rates currently available for bank loans with similar
terms and maturities. The Groups cash and cash equivalents and investments are placed with banking institutions with high credit ratings. The Group performs periodic credit standing evaluation of those banking institutions to limit the
Groups exposure to any credit risks.

The accounts receivable balances largely represent amounts due from the Groups principal
customers with high credit ratings. Based on the records of the Group, management of the Company believes that the Groups concentration of credit risk is limited.

The Group does not require collateral for any of its financial assets.



F-41



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|28 | Stock options
|-- | -------------

In September 1997, the Board of
Directors adopted Global-Techs 1997 Stock Option Plan (as amended, the 1997 Plan). The 1997 Plan provides for the grant of (i) options that are intended to qualify as incentive stock options (Incentive Stock
Options) within the meaning of Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) to employees and (ii) options not intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options to employees and consultants.
The total number of shares of common stock for which options may be granted under the 1997 Plan is 1,600,000 shares.

In October 2005, the
Board of Directors adopted Global-Techs 2005 Stock Option Plan (the 2005 Plan). The 2005 Plan provides for the grant of (i) incentive stocks options (ISOs) within the meaning of Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code); (ii) non-qualified stock options that do not qualify as ISOs (NQSOs); and (iii) stock appreciation rights. The total number of shares of common stock for which
options may be granted under the 2005 Plan is 1,800,000 shares.

The Plans are administered by the Board of Directors or a committee of
outside directors appointed by the Board of Directors, who determines the terms of options, including the exercise price, the number of shares subject to the option and the terms and conditions of exercise. No option granted under the Plans is
transferable by the optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution and each option is exercisable during the lifetime of the optionee only by such optionee. With respect to any participant who owns (or is deemed to own) stock
possessing more than 10% of the voting rights of Global-Techs outstanding capital stock, the exercise price of any Incentive Stock Option must not be less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant. The term of each option granted
pursuant to the Plans may be established by the Board of Directors, or a committee of the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion; provided, however, that the maximum term of each Incentive Stock Option granted pursuant to the Plan is 10 years.
With respect to any Incentive Stock Option granted to a participant who owns (or is deemed to own) stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of Global-Techs outstanding capital stock, the maximum term is
5 years.



F-42



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|28 | Stock options (continued)
|-- | -------------------------

Every option granted
shall vest and become exercisable in accordance with the terms of the applicable option agreement. Options can be exercised for a period not exceeding 10 years from the date of grant.

On May 10, 2000, Global-Tech offered a voluntary program to exchange up to approximately 991,900 options previously granted at exercise prices
ranging from US$8.31 to US$19.00 for a lower number of options at an exercise price of US$6.25 per share. For employees, every 100 old options with an exercise price of US$19.00 per share could be exchanged for 60 new options at an exercise price of
US$6.25 per share. For directors and officers holding options with exercise prices ranging from US$8.31 to US$14.50, the number of new options granted on exchange could be approximately 70.30% to 91.09% of the old options. The exchange ratios were
determined by independent advisors at an amount that would result in no intrinsic gain at the time of the exchange. The vesting schedule and life for these exchanged stock options remained unchanged. As a result, 914,100 old options were exchanged
for 711,175 options with an exercise price of US$6.25 per share as follows:



|                                           |  |                               |  |                             |  |                                             |  |                                                                 |  |                                
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Pre-exchange exercise price
per option US$ |  | Options cancelled on exchange |  | Options granted on exchange |  | Post-exchange exercise price per option US$ |  | Options granted sixmonths before and after thecancellation
date |  | Post-exchange number of options
|8.31                                       |  | 420,000                       |  | 382,568                     |  | 6.25                                        |  |                                                                |  | 382,568                        
|14.50                                      |  | 312,000                       |  | 219,347                     |  | 6.25                                        |  |                                                                |  | 219,347                        
|19.00                                      |  | 182,100                       |  | 109,260                     |  | 6.25                                        |  | 12,500                                                          |  | 121,760                        
|                                           |  |                               |  |                             |  |                                             |  |                                                                 |  |                                
|                                           |  | 914,100                       |  | 711,175                     |  |                                             |  | 12,500                                                          |  | 723,675                        
|                                           |  |                               |  |                             |  |                                             |  |                                                                 |  |                                

In accordance with FIN 44, these 711,175 options, together with the 12,500 options granted within
six months before or after the date of cancellation of the old options, are subjected to variable accounting prospectively and stock compensation expense is adjusted for subsequent changes in intrinsic value. For the fiscal year ended March 31,
2004, stock compensation expense of US$2,355,319 was provided in the consolidated statement of operations. For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, US$1,247,061 and US$348,162 of the expense was reversed in the consolidated statement
of operations, respectively.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, Global-Tech granted options to purchase (i) 20,000 shares
to an officer with exercise prices based upon the prevailing market price on the dates of vesting; (ii) 12,000 shares to a director with an exercise price of US$7.60 per share; (iii) 94,000 shares to 30 employees, 15,000 shares to two
officers and 240,000 shares to three directors with an exercise price of US$7.64 per share. During fiscal year 2004, an aggregate total of 13,880 shares with an exercise price of US$6.25 per share were forfeited upon the resignation of the
participants.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, no new options were granted and an aggregate total of 36,000 shares with an
exercise price of US$6.25 per share were forfeited upon resignation of the relevant participants.

For the fiscal year ended March 31,
2006, Global-Tech granted options to purchase (i) 180,000 shares to seven employees, 216,030 to four directors and 100,000 shares to a consultant with an exercise price of US$3.90 per share under the 1997 Plan in March 2006; and
(ii) 313,970 shares to two directors with an exercise price of US$3.90 per share under the 2005 Plan in March 2006. During fiscal 2006, 347,538 shares with an exercise price of US$6.25 granted to two directors and a consultant were
cancelled, 21,500 shares with exercise prices ranging from US$6.25 to US$7.64 were forfeited upon the resignation of the relevant participants, and 2,500 shares with an exercise price of US$5.75 were expired.



F-43



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|28 | Stock options (continued)
|-- | -------------------------

Changes in outstanding
options under the Plans during the three fiscal years ended March 31 are as follows:



|                                      |  |           |   |      |                       |      |                               |  |           |   |  |                       |  |                               |  |           |   |  |                       |  |                              
|------------------------------------- |  | --------- | - | ---- | --------------------- | ---- | ----------------------------- |  | --------- | - |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | --------- | - |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                      |  | 2004      |   | 2005 |                       | 2006
|                                      |  | Options   |   |      | Range ofexerciseprice |      | Weighted-averageexerciseprice |  | Options   |   |  | Range ofexerciseprice |  | Weighted-averageexerciseprice |  | Options   |   |  | Range ofexerciseprice |  | Weighted-averageexerciseprice
|                                      |  |           |   |      | US$                   |      | US$                           |  |           |   |  | US$                   |  | US$                           |  |           |   |  | US$                   |  | US$                          
|Outstanding, beginning of fiscal year |  | 1,141,688 |   |      | 4.55-19.00            |      | 5.75                          |  | 1,473,205 |   |  | 4.55-19.00            |  | 6.25                          |  | 1,391,495 |   |  | 4.55-19.00            |  | 6.22                         
|Granted                               |  | 381,000   |   |      | 7.60-8.32             |      | 7.67                          |  |          |   |  |                      |  |                              |  | 810,000   |   |  | 3.90-7.00             |  | 4.09                         
|Cancelled                             |  |          |   |      |                      |      |                              |  |          |   |  |                      |  |                              |  | (347,538  | ) |  | 6.25                  |  | 6.25                         
|Exercised                             |  | (35,603   | ) |      | 4.75-6.25             |      | 5.55                          |  | (45,710   | ) |  | 6.25                  |  | 6.25                          |  |          |   |  |                      |  |                             
|Forfeited/expired                     |  | (13,880   | ) |      | 6.25                  |      | 6.25                          |  | (36,000   | ) |  | 6.25-7.64             |  | 7.52                          |  | (23,800   | ) |  | 5.75-19.00            |  | 7.78                         
|                                      |  |           |   |      |                       |      |                               |  |           |   |  |                       |  |                               |  |           |   |  |                       |  |                              
|Outstanding, end of fiscal year       |  | 1,473,205 |   |      | 4.55-19.00            |      | 6.25                          |  | 1,391,495 |   |  | 4.55-19.00            |  | 6.22                          |  | 1,830,157 |   |  | 3.90-8.32             |  | 5.25                         
|                                      |  |           |   |      |                       |      |                               |  |           |   |  |                       |  |                               |  |           |   |  |                       |  |                              
|Exercisable, end of fiscal year       |  | 1,078,105 |   |      | 4.55-19.00            |      | 5.76                          |  | 1,043,795 |   |  | 4.55-19.00            |  | 5.75                          |  | 1,028,807 |   |  | 3.90-8.32             |  | 5.00                         
|                                      |  |           |   |      |                       |      |                               |  |           |   |  |                       |  |                               |  |           |   |  |                       |  |                              



|          |  |                                          |  |                                                  |  |                                         |  |           |  |                                        
|--------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- |  | --------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|          |  | Options outstanding as of March 31, 2006 |  | Options exercisable as of March 31, 2006        
|Options   |  | Range ofexerciseprice peroption          |  | Weighted-averageremainingcontractuallife
(years) |  | Weighted-averageexerciseprice
peroption |  | Options   |  | Weighted-averageexerciseprice
peroption
|          |  | US$                                      |  |                                                  |  | US$                                     |  |           |  | US$                                    
|760,000   |  | 3.90                                     |  | 10.00                                            |  | 3.90                                    |  | 325,000   |  | 3.90                                   
|690,157   |  | 4.55-6.25                                |  | 4.06                                             |  | 5.45                                    |  | 687,807   |  | 5.45                                   
|380,000   |  | 7.60-8.32                                |  | 7.87                                             |  | 7.59                                    |  | 16,000    |  | 8.05                                   
|          |  |                                          |  |                                                  |  |                                         |  |           |  |                                        
|1,830,157 |  | 3.90-8.32                                |  | 6.76                                             |  | 5.25                                    |  | 1,028,807 |  | 5.00                                   
|          |  |                                          |  |                                                  |  |                                         |  |           |  |                                        

The fair values per option granted during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 were estimated
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to be US$2.252, on a weighted-average basis. The fair values of the options granted were estimated on the date of grant using the following assumptions:



|                                |  |         |  |       |  |                
|------------------------------- |  | ------- |  | ----- |  | ---------------
|                                |  | 2004    |  | 2005* |  | 2006           
|Risk-free interest rate         |  | 3.80%   |  |      |  | 4.07% - 4.79%  
|Expected dividend yield         |  | 0%      |  |      |  | 0%             
|Expected option life            |  | 7 years |  |      |  | 7 years        
|Expected stock price volatility |  | 55.54%  |  |      |  | 50.12% - 51.39%

---

|* | No option was granted in 2005.
|- | ------------------------------



F-44



---

##### Table of Contents

GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|28 | Stock options (continued)
|-- | -------------------------

In conjunction with the
acquisition of LA on May 31, 2001, GLA established a stock option plan on the date of acquisition. The shares issued under this plan are based on the shares of the subsidiary of GLA and not of the Company. Under this plan, the following options
to purchase shares were outstanding as of March 31, 2006:



| | (a) | 800,000 options (2005: 800,000 options) in GLA at an exercise price of US$0.34 per share issued to four directors. These options were fully vested on May 31, 2004 and will
expire on May 31, 2011.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | 30,000 options (2005: 30,000 options) in GLA at exercise prices ranging from US$0.20 to US$1.50 per share issued to an employee. These options will expire on May 31, 2006.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | 20,000 options (2005: 20,000 options) in GLA at an exercise price of US$0.34 per share issued to an employee. These options will expire on November 12, 2012.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|29 | Subsequent events
|-- | -----------------



| | (a) | On March 17, 2006, the Group entered into an agreement with Anwell Technologies Limited (Anwell), a publicly listed company in Singapore, to form a joint venture
company, with its manufacturing facilities in China to explore synergies related to the production of OLED systems.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant
to the joint venture agreement, the Group will invest certain of OLED assets in exchange for 30% stake in the joint venture company and a convertible note with a face value of $5.6 million from Anwell.



| | (b) | Global Appliances Holdings Limited has entered into agreement on August 1, 2006, to sell a 30% interest in Global Auto Limited (formerly known as Lite Array (OLED) H.K.
Limited) at a consideration of US$38,660, to an independent third party. The transaction will be completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|30 | Changes in presentation of comparative consolidated financial statements
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, US$810,000 contingent loss has been reclassified from SG&A line item to other operating loss to conform to the current fiscal years presentation.



F-45



---

##### Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|1.1           |  | Memorandum of Association of Global-Tech, as amended. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Global-Techs Registration Statement
on Form F-1, SEC File No. 333-8462 (the Registration Statement)                                               
|              | 
|1.2           |  | Articles of Association of Global-Tech, as amended. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005)                                                                     
|              | 
|1.3           |  | Resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing an amendment to the Articles of Association of Global-Tech, as amended. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 1.3 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005)
|              | 
|4.1           |  | Commission Agreement between Global-Tech and Eyal Lior. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration
Statement.)                                                                                                                      
|              | 
|4.2           |  | Employment Agreement between Global-Tech and Kwong Ho Sham. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration
Statement.)                                                                                                                  
|              | 
|4.3           |  | Employment Agreement between Global-Tech and John C.K. Sham. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration
Statement.)                                                                                                                 
|              | 
|4.4           |  | Supply Agreement between Global-Tech and Sunbeam Products, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration
Statement.)                                                                                                              
|              | 
|4.5           |  | Lease Agreement between Global-Tech and the Peoples Government of Qingxi Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, together with the English
language translation thereof. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement.)   
|              | 
|4.6           |  | License Agreement between Global-Tech and the Buji Economic Development Company, together with the English language translation thereof.
(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration Statement.)                                     
|              | 
|4.7           |  | Lease Agreement between Global-Tech and Wing Shing Products Company Limited. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Global-Techs
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999.)                                          
|              | 
|4.8           |  | Amendment to Tenancy Agreement dated April 17, 2002. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002.)                                                                   
|              | 
|4.9           |  | Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan of Global-Tech. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration
Statement.)                                                                                                                  
|              | 
|4.10          |  | 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Global-Tech. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to Global-Techs Report on Form 6-K for the
month of February 1999.)                                                                                          
|              | 
|4.11          |  | Credit Facility Agreement between Global-Tech and Standard Chartered Bank. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registration
Statement.)                                                                                                  
|              | 
|4.12          |  | Supplemental advice letter dated April 26, 1999 from Standard Chartered Bank. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999.)                                        



E-1



---

##### Table of Contents

Table of Contents



|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|4.13 |  | Supplemental advice letter dated June 1, 2000 from Standard Chartered Bank. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to
Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.)                                        
|     | 
|4.14 |  | Supplemental advice letter dated July 10, 2000 from Standard Chartered Bank. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to Global-Techs
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.)                                       
|     | 
|4.15 |  | Credit Facility Agreement with HongkongBank. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registration Statement.)                                                                                                                             
|     | 
|4.16 |  | Supplemental advice letter dated September 30, 2000 from HongkongBank. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to Global-Techs Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.)                                             
|     | 
|4.17 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated April 7, 2000 with Citibank, N.A. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.16 to Global-Techs Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.)                                                  
|     | 
|4.18 |  | Supplemental advice letter dated February 1, 2001 from Citibank, N.A. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to Global-Techs Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.)                                              
|     | 
|4.19 |  | Lease Agreement dated July 29, 2002 between Goman Limited and Pentalpha Hong Kong Limited. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to
Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002.)                         
|     | 
|4.20 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated May 27, 2002 between Standard Chartered Bank and Pentalpha HK Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.20
to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.)                 
|     | 
|4.21 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated May 27, 2002 between Standard Chartered Bank and Wing Shing Products (BVI) Co, Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.21 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.)
|     | 
|4.22 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated May 27, 2002 between Standard Chartered Bank and Kwong Lee Trading Co. Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.22 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.)        
|     | 
|4.23 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated December 5, 2002 with Citibank, N.A. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to Global-Techs Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.)                                               
|     | 
|4.24 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated June 20, 2002 between Pentalpha Macau Commercial Offshore Ltd. with HongkongBank. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.24 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.)  
|     | 
|4.25 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated March 26, 2003 between Pentalpha Hong Kong Ltd. with HongkongBank (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.25
to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.)                  
|     | 
|4.26 |  | Banking facilities letter dated November 4, 2003 between Pentalpha Macau Commercial Offshore Ltd. and HongkongBank. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.26 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.)



E-2



---

##### Table of Contents

Table of Contents



|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|4.27 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated November 3, 2003 between Pentalpha Hong Kong Ltd. with Hongkong Bank. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.27 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.)                     
|4.28 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated September 24, 2003 between Standard Chartered Bank and Pentalpha Hong Kong Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.28 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.)           
|4.29 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated July 28, 2003 between Standard Chartered Bank and Pentalpha Macau Commercial Offshore Ltd. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.29 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.)
|4.30 |  | Credit Facility Agreement dated September 24, 2003 between Standard Chartered Bank and Kwong Lee Shun Trading Co. Ltd. (Incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.30 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004.)    
|4.31 |  | Credit Facility Letter dated September 22, 2004 between Standard Chartered Bank and Kwong Lee Shun Trading Co. Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 4.31 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.)       
|4.32 |  | Credit Facility Letter dated September 22, 2004 between Standard Chartered Bank and Pentalpha Hong Kong Ltd. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.31 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.)              
|4.33 |  | Tenancy Agreement dated January 21, 2005 between Rikon Limited and Winway Technology Development Limited. (Incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.31 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.)                 
|4.34 |  | Novation Agreement in respect of 21/F., Citicorp Centre, 18 Whitfield Road, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.31 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.)                      
|4.35 |  | Credit Facilities Agreement dated January 26, 2006 between Standard Chartered Bank and Pentalpha Hong Kong Ltd. *                                                                                                                                                  
|4.36 |  | Credit Facilities Agreement dated November 18, 2005 between Standard Chartered Bank and Pentalpha Macau Commercial Offshore Limited.
*                                                                                                                             
|4.37 |  | Credit Facilities Agreement dated January 26, 2006 between Standard Chartered Bank and Kwong Lee Shun Trading Co. Ltd. *                                                                                                                                           
|4.38 |  | Credit Facilities Agreement dated March 21, 2006 between Standard Chartered Bank and Kwong Lee Shun Trading Co. Ltd. *                                                                                                                                             
|4.39 |  | Credit Facilities Agreement dated January 26, 2006 between Standard Chartered Bank and Global Rich Innovation Ltd. *                                                                                                                                               
|4.40 |  | 2005 Stock Option Plan of Global-Tech. *                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|4.41 |  | Share Sale and Purchase Agreement and Shareholders Agreement, each dated March 17, 2006, between Anwell Technologies Limited and Consortium
Investment (BVI) Limited. *                                                                                           
|8.1  |  | List of Subsidiaries. *                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|11.1 |  | Code of Ethics. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to Global-Techs Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2004.)                                                                                                                  
|12.1 |  | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer. *                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|12.2 |  | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Acting Chief Financial Officer.*                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|13.1 |  | Certification by Chief Executive Officer. *                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|13.2 |  | Certification by Acting Chief Financial Officer. *                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|15.1 |  | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm *                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|15.2 |  | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. *                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|15.3 |  | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. *                                                                                                                                                                                                        

---

|* | Filed Herewith
|- | --------------



E-3