alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015046EN.01001001.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 December 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Mechelen — Belgium) — Criminal proceedings against Edgard Jan De Clercq and Others

(Case C-315/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom to provide services - Articles 56 TFEU and 57 TFEU - Directive 96/71/EC - Article 3(1) and (10) - Directive 2006/123/EC - Article 19 - National legislation requiring the person to whom posted employees or trainees are deployed to declare those who are unable to submit the acknowledgement of receipt of the declaration which should have been made to the host Member State by their employer established in another Member State - Criminal penalty))

(2015/C 046/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Mechelen

Parties in the main proceedings

Parties in the main proceedings

Edgard Jan De Clercq, Emiel Amede Rosa De Clercq, Nancy Genevieve Wilhelmina Rottiers, Ermelinda Jozef Martha Tampère, Thermotec NV

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 56 TFEU and 57 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which the recipient of services performed by workers posted by a service provider established in another Member State is required to declare to the competent authorities, before those workers begin to work, the data identifying those workers who are unable to submit proof of the declaration which their employer should have made to the competent authorities of that host Member State prior to the commencement of that provision of services, since such legislation is capable of being justified as safeguarding an overriding ground of public interest, such as the protection of workers or the combating of social security fraud, on condition that it is established that that legislation is appropriate for ensuring the attainment of the legitimate objective or objectives pursued and that it does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve them, these being matters for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

1

---
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 20

- 12791
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus EQUANZICK HOWELL, a.k.a. Pookie, a.k.a. Big Pook, a.k.a. Pook Pook,

Defendant

- Appellant. USCA11 Case: 20-12791 Date Filed: 12/15/2021 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 20

- 12791

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:18

- cr

- 00146

- J DW

- AEP

- 1

____________________ Before J ILL P RYOR , G RANT , and B RASHER , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 13 50

– 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) ( appeal waiver includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues) ; see also United States v. Anderson , 772 F.3d 662, 668

– 69 (11th Cir. 2014) (pr ior appellate decision binds subsequent proceedings in the same case). USCA11 Case: 20-12791 Date Filed: 12/15/2021 Page: 2 of 2
March 12, 1958

Reap. Dec. 9095.

#### Arbit *Trading Co.*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiff.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report
of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James E. Mead, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated: February 27, 2009             
|                                     
|/S/     JAMES E.
MEAD                
|James E. Mead Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.2


AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO


THE WASHINGTON SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B. 1988 STOCK
INCENTIVE PLAN


 


                                WSB Holdings, Inc.
sponsors The Washington Savings Bank, F.S.B. 1988 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  The Plan is hereby amended as set forth
below:


 


1.               All references to “The
Washington Savings Bank, F.S.B.” and the “Bank” shall be replaced with and
refer to “WSB Holdings, Inc.”


 


2.               Except as amended above, the
Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WSB Holdings, Inc.
has executed this Plan Amendment Number 1 to The Washington Savings Bank,
F.S.B. 1988 Stock Incentive Plan as of this 16th day of January, 2008.


 


 


	
   

  	
  WSB
  Holdings, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Phillip C. Bowman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Phillip
  C. Bowman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chief
  Executive Officer

  



 


	
  ATTEST:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Cheryl Golden
# C_2012287EN.01002001.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Huy (Belgium) lodged on 28 June 2012 — Agim Ajdini v État belge, Service des Allocations aux Handicapés

(Case C-312/12)

2012/C 287/37

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal du travail de Huy

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agim Ajdini

Applicant:

Defendant: État belge, Service des Allocations aux Handicapés

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 4 of the Law of 27 February 1987 on Disability Benefits compatible with European Union Law, and in particular with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (200/C 364/01), inter alia Articles 20, 21 and 26 thereof, in so far as it excludes from entitlement to disability benefits, solely on grounds of nationality, a foreign national who is lawfully resident in Belgium, is entered in the Aliens Register and has strong and long-standing links with Belgium, having lived there with his family for 12 years, with the particular circumstance that that foreign person is a national of a third country which is an official candidate for accession to the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 4 of the Law of 27 February 1987 on Disability Benefits compatible with European Union Law, and in particular with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (200/C 364/01), inter alia Articles 20, 21 and 26 thereof, in so far as it excludes from entitlement to disability benefits, solely on grounds of nationality, a foreign national who is lawfully resident in Belgium, is entered in the Aliens Register and has strong and long-standing links with Belgium, having lived there with his family for 12 years, with the particular circumstance that that foreign person is a national of a third country which is an official candidate for accession to the European Union?

| 2. | Is Article 26(4) of the Special Law of 6 January 1989 on the Court of Arbitration compatible with European law, and in particular with Article 234 of the Treaty establishing the European Community? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 26(4) of the Special Law of 6 January 1989 on the Court of Arbitration compatible with European law, and in particular with Article 234 of the Treaty establishing the European Community?

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27801-27802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-830]


Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Extension of 
Time Limits for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolanta Lawska or John Conniff, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-8362 
or (202) 482-1009, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 27, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') 
published a notice of initiation of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from 
Mexico, covering the period October 1, 2005, to September 30, 2006. See 
Initiation of Antidumping and

[[Page 27802]]

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation 
in Part (71 FR 68535). The preliminary results of this review are 
currently due no later than July 3, 2007.

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order 
or finding for which a review is requested. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Act further states that if it is not practicable to complete the review 
within the time period specified, the administering authority may 
extend the 245-day period to issue its preliminary results by up to 120 
days.
    We determine that completion of the preliminary results of this 
review within the 245-day period is not practicable for the following 
reasons. There have been significant changes in the ownership and 
operating structure of Hylsa from the previous review period. To 
conduct the sales and cost analyses of Hylsa requires the Department to 
gather and analyze a significant amount of information pertaining to 
Hylsa's modified sales practices, manufacturing costs and corporate 
relationships. Given the number and complexity of issues in this case, 
and in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are 
extending the time period for issuing the preliminary results of review 
to 365 days. Therefore, the preliminary results are now due no later 
than October 31, 2007. The final results continue to be due 120 days 
after publication of the preliminary results.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    Dated: May 11, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-9540 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
No. 55596.

#### Ratsey & Lapthorn, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 772742-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I,  Michael  Chou,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of C&D  Production  Inc.  for the quarter  ended March 31,
2005 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.

         I,  Chien-Te  Chou,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of C&D  Production  Inc.  for the quarter  ended March 31,
2005 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.

         Pursuant to the rules and  regulations  of the  Securities and Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.


By:  /s/ Michael Chou
     --------------------------------------
     Michael Chou
     Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
     Officer and Secretary


By:  /s/ Chien-Te Chou
     --------------------------------------
     Chien-Te Chou
     Chief Financial Officer and
     Administrative and Financial Manager

May 20, 2005
No. 96-439.

#### Blalock et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of, I, Sanding Tao, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May
19, 2009





/S/
      Sanding TaoSanding
      Tao
              Chief
      Financial Officer
No. 56712.

protests 181463-K, etc. (New York).

#### Empire Fashion Jewelry et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology,
      Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jingan Wang, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 15, 2006





/S/
      Jingan Wang


Jingan
      Wang


Chief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

I, Peter T. Kissinger, the Chairman of the Board; President; and Chief Executive
Officer of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004, (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods
set forth therein.

| | /s/  Peter T. Kissinger
Peter T. Kissinger
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer
January 12, 2005
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Michael R. Cox, the Vice President, Finance; Chief Financial Officer; and
Treasurer of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004, (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods
set forth therein.

| | /s/  Michael R. Cox
Michael R. Cox
Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
January 12, 2005
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1958 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

AN ACT 

To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until May 

31, 2012. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1958 RFH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSUR2 ANCE PROGRAM. 

3 (a) PROGRAM EXTENSION.—Section 1319 of the Na4 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘May 31, 2012’’. 

7 (b) FINANCING.—Section 1309(a) of the National 

8 Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2011’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘May 31, 2012’’. 

11 (c) REPEAL.—The Continuing Appropriations Act, 

12 2012 (Public Law 112–36; 125 Stat. 386) is amended by 

13 striking section 130. 

Passed the Senate December 7, 2011. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm 

Answerthink, Inc. 

Miami, Florida 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69951, 333-90635, and 333-39460), and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87749 and 333-32342) of Answerthink, Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2006, except as to the effect of therestatement discussed in Note 1, which is dated February 15, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of Answerthink, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K/A. Our report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting expressed our opinion that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2005.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Miami, Florida 

February 15, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I,
Stephen A. Snider, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



|/s/STEPHEN A. SNIDERStephen A. Snider
Chief Executive Officer
June 10, 2004 |  |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 

In
connection with the Annual Report of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, J.
Michael Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



|/s/J. MICHAEL ANDERSONJ. Michael Anderson
Chief Financial Officer
June 10, 2004 |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Progress Toward Equal Pay in the Meat-Packing Industry

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Erickson, Ethel. 						*Progress Toward Equal Pay in the Meat-Packing Industry : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 251*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5524,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Ronnie Earl THOMASON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-789.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 12, 1998.

Ronnie Earl Thomason, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Charmaine M. Millsaps, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ERVIN, Judge.

The order denying appellant’s third motion for postconviction relief is affirmed, because the motion constitutes an abusive successive motion. *See Christopher v. State,*489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986).

AFFIRMED.

MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.