alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Broadwind Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Cameron Drecoll,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ J. Cameron Drecoll                                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Cameron Drecoll                                     |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  (principal executive officer) |   |
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| Date: November 2,  2009                           |   |

 

----
# C_2014159EN.01000901.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 April 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Hauptzollamt Köln v Kronos Titan GmbH (C-43/13), Hauptzollamt Krefeld v Rhein-Ruhr Beschichtungs-Service GmbH (C-44/13)

(Joined Cases C-43/13 and C-44/13) (1)

1

((Directive 2003/96/EC - Taxation of energy products - Products not listed in Directive 2003/96/EC - Meaning of ‘equivalent heating fuel or motor fuel’))

2014/C 159/11

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Hauptzollamt Köln (C-43/13), Hauptzollamt Krefeld (C-44/13)

Appellants:

Respondents: Kronos Titan GmbH (C-43/13), Rhein-Ruhr Beschichtungs-Service GmbH (C-44/13)

Respondents:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Article 2(3) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51) — Taxation of energy products other than those for which a level of taxation is specified in the directive — Meaning of equivalent heating fuel or motor fuel — Possibility of applying to a product used as heating fuel the tax rate laid down for a product which has the closest chemical composition, where that product is subject to a higher rate of taxation than that laid down for heating fuel since it may be used as motor fuel

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The condition, laid down in Article 2(3) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, according to which energy products other than those for which a level of taxation is specified in the directive are to be taxed according to use, at the rate for the equivalent heating fuel or motor fuel, must be construed as meaning that it must be determined, first, whether the product at issue is used as heating fuel or motor fuel, before identifying, secondly, for which of the motor fuels or the heating fuels, as the case may be, listed in the corresponding table in Annex I to that directive the product at issue is in fact a substitute in terms of use or, failing that, which of those motor fuels or those heating fuels is, by its properties and intended use, the closest to it.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1   BINGHAM CANYON CORPORATION  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Bingham Canyon Corporation certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bingham Canyon Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bingham Canyon Corporation.   Date:  August 12, 2010/s/ Brett D. Mayer
Brett D. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
### Author: Abt Associates Inc.

Date Created: Date Modified:5/26/2011

Purpose: This file lists all facilities that are located in Marine Protected areas. This information is used

in the MPA analysis in the Executive Order chapter.

File Contents:

Worksheet Contents

Selected_FacsContains a list of every facilities (determined in MPA_Inventory_GIS_Database_Table.xls)

that is located in a Marine Protected Area

The original version of this file contains, or is linked to a file that contains, confidential business information (CBI), or information that could be used to reveal CBI. As a result, the values for any variables determined by EPA to be CBI, or that could be used to reveal CBI, have been concealed.FID_ SurveyIDFacility_TPhaseLat Long_State RegionWater_Type Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 3 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 3 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2Count of Region RegionTotal CAL 2 GL 9 INL 23 MA 44 Mex 10 NA 20 SA 10 Grand Total 118FID_ SurveyIDFacility_TPhaseLat Long_State RegionWater_Type Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 3 Generator 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 3 Manufacturer 3 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Generator 2 Manufacturer 3 Generator 3 Generator 2 Generator 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6199

JOHN RUTHERFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CORPORAL DALE ANDERS; SERGEANT MELINDA HANEY, a/k/a Sergeant 

Belinda; PFC DAVID EAVES,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

UNION COUNTY JAIL; ROBERT HINES, Administrator; D. HANEY, 

Assistant Administrator; OFFICER DELL MITCHELL, a/k/a 

Officer Dell,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(2:11-cv-03139-DCN)

Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

John Rutherford, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., 

CHAPMAN, HARTER & HARTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

John Rutherford appeals the district court’s final judgment 

entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Appellees in his civil 

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). The record does not 

contain a transcript of the trial proceedings. An appellant has 

the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of 

all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on 

appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). An appellant 

proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis is entitled to 

transcripts at government expense only in certain circumstances. 

28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2012). By failing to produce a transcript 

or to qualify for the production of a transcript at government 

expense, Rutherford has waived review of the issues on appeal 

that depend upon the transcript to show error. Fed. R. App. P. 

10(b)(2); Keller v. Prince George’s Cnty., 827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 

(4th Cir. 1987).

As the record before us reveals that Rutherford did not 

pursue any post-verdict motions pursuant to Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 50(b) or Rule 59, he may not challenge the 

sufficiency of evidence supporting the jury’s verdict. Belk, 

Inc. v. Meyer Corp., U.S., 679 F.3d 146, 154 (4th Cir. 2012). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment and deny 

his pending motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
4

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the Quarterly Report of WealthCraft Systems Inc.
("WealthCraft") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kelly Jay Michael
Tallas, Chief Executive Officer of WealthCraft, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
------------------------------
Name: Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
Chief Executive Officer

Date:      May 15, 2007
Before the Third Division,

August 9, 1938

No. 39168.

#### Protest 792760-G of Associated Mfrs. Importing Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Seller*v. *United States*(T. D. 47417) the Tom-and-Jerry mugs in question were held dutiable at only 70 percent ad valorem under paragraph 212 as claimed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: U.S. Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, 
Washington, DC 20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 103; OMB Control No. 3235-0466; SEC File No. 270-410.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget a request for approval of extension of the existing 
collection of information provided for in the following rule: Rule 103 
of Regulation M (17 CFR 242.103).
    Rule 103 permits passive market-making in Nasdaq securities during 
a distribution. A distribution participant that seeks use of this 
exception would be required to disclose to third parties its intention 
to engage in passive market making.
    There are approximately 214 respondents per year that require an 
aggregate total of 214 hours to comply with this rule. Each respondent 
makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes approximately 
1 hour to complete. Thus, the total compliance burden per year is 214 
burden hours. The total compliance cost for the respondents is 
approximately $12,037.50, resulting in a cost of compliance for the 
respondent per response of approximately $56.25 (i.e., $12,037.50/214 
responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    Comments should be directed to (i) Desk Officer for the Securities 
and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d899b4bda0b9b6bcbdaa878cf68790adb6ac98b7b5baf6bdb7a8f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="27664b425f4649434255787309786f52495367484a450942485709404851">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley 
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-
mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91c1c3d0cedcf0f8fdf3fee9d1e2f4f2bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="055557445a48646c69676a7d457660662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments must be submitted within 30 
days of this notice.

    Dated: April 30, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-10040 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2013164EN.01001702.xml

| 8.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/17

---

Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals and Others v Council

(Case T-28/12) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Adoption of a new regulation - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 164/32

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals (Kabil-Batam, Indonesia); Ecogreen Oleochemials (Singapore) Pte Ltd, (Singapore, Singapore); and Ecogreen Oleochemicals GmbH (Dessau-Roβlau, Germany) (represented by: F. Graafsma and J. Cornelis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, Agent, and by G. Berrisch and N. Chesaites, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment in part of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 of 8 November 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia (OJ 2011 L 293, p. 1), in so far as it imposes an anti-dumping duty on PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH and Sasol Germany GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH and Sasol Germany GmbH.

| 3. | The Council of the European Union shall bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals, Ecogreen Oleochemials (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Ecogreen Oleochemicals GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Council of the European Union shall bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by PT Ecogreen Oleochemicals, Ecogreen Oleochemials (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Ecogreen Oleochemicals GmbH.

| 4. | Sasol Olefins & Surfactants and Sasol Germany shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Sasol Olefins & Surfactants and Sasol Germany shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.

1

---
**CERTIFICATION          OF CEO AND CFO**

**PURSUANT          TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) |   | the                    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   |
|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |   | the                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    the                    Company. |

|                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                  |   |
| /s/                    Stephen                    P. DeFalco     |   |
| Name:                    Stephen P. DeFalco                      |   |
| Title:                    President and Chief Executive Officer  |   |

|                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                             |   |
| /s/                    James A. H. Garner                                                                   |   |
| Name:                    James A. H. Garner                                                                 |   |
| Title:                    Executive Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial                    Officer  |   |
(Reap. Dec. 9070)

#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 7456.

(Decided February 11, 1958)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

Tbis appeal for reappraisement bas been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for tbe parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, that the market value or the price of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the appeal for reappraisement enumerated above at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Germany, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States was in this case the appraised value less the amount added under duress, packing included, and that there was no higher foreign value.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal be submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as tbat value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and tbat sucb values were the' appraised values, less tbe amounts added under duress.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 45289.

#### Protests 766315-G, etc., of Jos. S. Finch & Co. et al. (Pittsburgh, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-12-00830-CR

Joseph Lester GREEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-06-10686-CR

Honorable Camile G. DuBose, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for a new trial.

SIGNED May 28, 2014.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of California Clean Air, Inc.("Company")
on Form 10- QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 ("Report") I, Stephen D.
Wilson, President of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 14, 2003

                                                     /s/ STEPHEN D. WILSON

                                                     Stephen D. Wilson
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending February 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp. (the "Company") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James A. Smith, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/JAMES A. SMITHJames A. Smith Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 1,
2003

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Al Kozak, as Chief Executive Officer of SmarTire Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the accompanying Form 10-KSB report for the period ending July 31, 2005 as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: October 28, 2005                         /s/ Al Kozak
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Al Kozak, CEO