alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.a CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Clifford Wildes, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, of Morgan Beaumont, Inc. (the Company); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules13a-15 and 15d-15) for the Company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date); and (c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  1       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and 6. The Companys other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Date: June 2, 2006
        /s/ Clifford WildesClifford Wildes, Chief Executive Officer  * Provide a separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company. See Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).   2
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Williams promotes McDonald during Korea visit

By DLA Indo-Pacific

                CAMP HUMPHREY, Korea  –              
Defense Logistics Agency Director Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams, officiated the promotion ceremony of Army Staff Sgt. Marcus McDonald at Camp Humphrey, Korea, Feb. 7. McDonald, a native of Fredericksburg, Virginia with 12 years of active duty service, is assigned to DLA Indo-Pacific Korea as the operations nonommissioned officer.  Before his current assignment, McDonald worked as the stock control supervisor with the 603rd Aviation Support Battalion at Fort Stewart-Hunter Airfield, Georgia.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Indo-PacificCamp Humphreypromotion
# C_2014093EN.01001701.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber Chamber) of 13 February 2014 — Hungary v European Commission, Slovak Republic

(Case C-31/13 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Protected geographical indications - Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 - Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications for wine - E-Bacchus database - Tokaj)

2014/C 93/26

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and K. Szíjjártó, Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, B. Schima and B. Eggers, Agents), Slovak Republic (represented by B. Ricziová, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 November 2012 in Case T-194/10 Hungary v Commission, in which the General Court dismissed as inadmissible an application for cancellation of the entry of the protected designation of origin ‘Vinohradnícka oblast’ Tokaj’, with Slovakia indicated as country of origin, in the electronic register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications for wine (E-Bacchus database) — Legal effects of an entry in the E-Bacchus database — Obligation to state reasons — Principles of sound administration, sincere cooperation and legal certainty.

Hungary

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Hungary to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hungary to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Slovak Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Slovak Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.

1

---
Before the Second Division,

June 7, 1944

No. 49476.

#### Petition 6374-R of N. Geraci & Co. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

At the trial an employee of the petitioner who handles all its customs transactions testified that he made each of the entries and the only information he had was invoices of previous shipments. He stated he had had *328some conversations with the customs officials, at which time the customs officials agreed to furnish him with the proper values. The Government witness testified that the values were discussed with the witness for the petitioner and that he stated to the entrant he would give him any information desired if he would make a specific request-in each instance, but that this request was never made and that some of the entries were filed since this discussion. Therefore there was nothing he could do, he stated, but appraise at the market value. Another witness testified that he owned a portion of the merchandise covered by some of the entries and when he received his bill showing the value at which the okra had been entered he got in touch with witness for petitioner and told him they had been entered too low; that the price was higher, and that he wanted to enter near the right price. This information the witness disregarded, stating that he had the consular invoice and that was what he was supposed to go by. The entry was not amended. The court was of the opinion that when the owner of a portion of .the merchandise advised the plaintiff’s witness that the entered values were too low this was sufficient to put an ordinary prudent man upon his guard and cause him to investigate and ascertain the proper values at which to enter. The record as a whole, failing to establish that the entry of the merchandise at values less than those found upon final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts, the petition was denied.
#### North American Mercantile Co. *v.*United States

No. 8072.

Entry No. 6901.

(Decided January 7, 1952)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for tlie plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for tbe parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows between counsel for plaintiff and the .Assistant Attorney General for the United States, concerning the merchandise referred to herein:

> (1) That this stipulation is limited to so much of said merchandise as is described in the invoice as clams in 5-ounce cans or tins, such items being marked A and initialed by Examiner Z. S. Brown, and said article being appraised on the basis of the American selling price in accordance with the Presidential proclamation published in TD 47031.

> (2) That such merchandise is the same in all material respects as the imported clams involved in United States v. Mutual Supply Co. et al. and Mutual Supply Co. et al. v. United States, Reap. Dec. 6950, and that the issues herein are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in said decision.

> (3) That upon the dates of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by this appeal, like or similar merchandise manufactured or produced in the United States was being freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal market of the United States in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities, including all containers and coverings and all costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for delivery, at the following prices per dozen cans or tins, less a cash discount of 1)4 per centum:

> 5-ounce size: March 16, 1941, to June 30, 1941_$1. 05

> (4) That the record in said Reap. Dec. 5950 may be incorporated herein and that upon this stipulation the appeal may be deemed submitted, it being limited to the items marked A on the invoice and abandoned as to all other merchandise.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe American selling price, as that, value is defined in section 402 (g) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of the merchandise described in tbe invoice as clams in 5-ounce cans or tins, which were appraised on tbe basis of tbe American selling price in accordance with tbe Presidential proclamation published in T. D. 47031, and which items are marked A and initialed by examiner Z. S. Brown, and that such value Weds $1.05 per dozen cans or tins, less *1%*per centum cash discount.

*515The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05065

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05065\05065_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05065\05065_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05065\05065_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05065\05065_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05065\05065_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05065\05065_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05065\Certification Statement Plant ID 05065.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05065\Correspondence\05065 Response_032411\05065_Email Correspondence_032411.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

x 05065\Correspondence\05065 Response_032411\Copy of ALF_Part_A.xls Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

x 05065\Supplemental Documents\05065_ALF ICR Flow Schematic Source Diagram August 2010.pptxPlant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05065\Supplemental Documents\05065_ALF Part D Block Diagrams.xlsx Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

05065\Supplemental Documents\05065_Allen Fossil Plant_EA for Units 1,2,3, Selective Cayaltic Re.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05065\Supplemental Documents\05065_Allen Fossil Plant_Environmental Statement_Gas Turbine P (1).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05065\Supplemental Documents\05065_Allen Fossil Plant_Environmental Statement_Gas Turbine Peaki.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05065\Supplemental Documents\05065_Allen Fossil Plant_Revised EA for Units 1,2,3, Selective Cay.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05065\Supplemental Documents\05065_Allen Fossil Plant_SCR Catalyst Replacement Unit 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05065\Supplemental Documents\05065_FEA_Allen Fossil Plant Biogas Fuel Supplement Project.pdfPlant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05065\Supplemental Documents\ALF.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05065\05065_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05065\05065_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 of Time Warner Telecom, Inc. (333-117757, 333-117754, 333-48084, 333-83995) of our reports dated March 16, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Time Warner Telecom,Inc., Time Warner Telecom, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Time Warner Telecom, Inc. included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

Denver, Colorado 

March 16, 2006
No. 46470.

#### Protest 34267-K of Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. (Portland, Me.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The proprietor of the actual importing concern testified that the sizes, type, quality, and use of the material here involved were the-same as that the subject of *Pacific Customs Brokerage Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 146, C. D. 387), and that it can be used for various purposes, such as slats, seats, rungs, etc., of chairs. From the testimony it was apparent that the merchandise consists of birch lumber in small sizes for use in the manufacture of chairs but not, in the condition as imported, dedicated to any particular use. On the record presented the merchandise was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1803 but held subject to tax under the provisions of section 601 (c) (6), Revenue Act of 1932, as amended, as claimed.
No. 74-492.

#### Ohio *v.*Gallagher.

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and certiorari granted.
October 7, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Teleconference with American Electric Power (AEP) 

Attendees: 

Gina McCartthy, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Joseph Goffman, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Lorie Schmidt, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Peter Tsirigotis, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Kevin Culligan, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

John McManus, AEP 

Dennis Welsh, AEP 

Mark McCollough, AEP 

Discussion: 

A general discussion was held of the comments submitted by AEP on the proposed Mercury and 

Air Toxics Standards (MATS). AEP indicated that MATS would cause them to have to close 

many plants ahead of schedule; many of those plants are “RMR” plants which will cause big 

reliability problems; and an unspecified number of them are black start facilities. AEP indicated 

a need for much more time - until 2020. And if they had more time, there would be no serious 

environmental consequence because they have already gotten 80 percent reduction in NOX and 

SO2.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W.
H. Easter III, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         /s/ W. H. Easter III
--------------------------------------------
W. H. Easter III
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
November 10, 2004
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November      12, 2009 |   | /s/      Samuel W. Fairchild       |
|------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                                     |   | Samuel      W. Fairchild           |
|                                     |   | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                                     |   | (principal      executive officer) |

----

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

KENNETH KLINE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3213 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 5, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
January 19, 1939

No. 40507.

#### Protest 931384-G of Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd.

C. D. 58. Application by plaintiff for rehearing denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ixia Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 9, 2007
    
    /s/ Errol GinsbergErrol GinsbergPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 9, 2007
    
    /s/ Thomas B. MillerThomas B. MillerChief Financial Officer
 24
No. 42139.

#### Protests 983924, etc., of Bloomingdale Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of •embroidered motifs, galloons, trimmings, bands, and laces similar to that the subject of *Pustet*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Normandy lace articles like those passed upon in *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A., 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                 AS ENACTED BY
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q, Third Wave Technologies, Inc. (the "Company")
for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lance Fors, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



                                                     /s/ Lance Fors
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Lance Fors
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     November 14, 2002
Exhibit
10.2


 


TITAN MACHINERY INC.


Description of Fiscal 2008 Executive
Bonus Plan


 


Titan Machinery Inc.’s Executive Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) is designed to
reward executive officers for achievement of performance relating to Titan’s
goals and achievement of personal goals annually set by the Compensation
Committee.


 


Our Chief Executive
Officer and our President and Chief Financial Officer each may earn a potential
bonus of up to 200% of his base salary in a fiscal year and our Vice President,
Finance and Treasurer may earn a potential bonus of up to 70% of his base
salary. Base salary will
be the officer’s annual salary rate, as determined by the Compensation
Committee for such fiscal year.  The
Plan provides that 40% of the eligible bonus is based upon achievement of Titan’s
pre-tax net income goal, 20% is based on achievement of Titan’s total sales
goal and 20% is based on Titan’s return on assets goal.  The remaining 20% of the eligible bonus is
based upon achievement of personal position-specific goals set by each officer
in consultation with the Compensation Committee.(1)


 


The annual bonus will be
paid 100% in cash.