alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance



 




Exhibit 10.7

Amendment to Existing Warrants




This Amendment to Warrant and the Warrant amended hereby have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”), and are “restricted securities” as that term is defined in Rule
144 under the Act. The securities may not be offered for sale, sold or otherwise transferred
except pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Act, or pursuant to an exemption
from registration under the Act, the availability of which is to be established to the satisfaction
of the Company.



***SMART MOVE, INC.***




CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF WARRANT ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 2, 2007 TO PURCHASE 100,000 SHARES

OF COMMON STOCK OF SMART MOVE, INC. AT AN EXERCISE PRICE OF $3.25, EXPIRING AT 5:00 P.M. ON

SEPTEMBER 2, 2010




THIS CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF WARRANT is dated January 22, 2008 and certifies that the
Warrant previously issued to Thomas P. Grainger dated September 2, 2007 and expiring at 5:00 P.M.
on September 2, 2010 (“Existing Warrant”), has been amended pursuant to an Amended and Restated
Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement of even date herewith signed by the Smart Move, Inc. (the
“Company”) and the Holder of the Warrant to which this amendment pertains, Thomas P. Grainger.



For value exchanged, the Company and the Holder have agreed that the Exercise Price of $3.25
currently applicable under the Existing Warrant shall be, and hereby is, revised to be $1.25 per
Share.



The only change the parties wish to make to the Existing Warrant is to specify a revised
Exercise Price as above provided. The parties intend all other terms of the Existing Warrant to
remain the same.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Amendment of Warrant has been duly executed as of the
day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	SMART MOVE, INC.

 	 
	 	/s/Chris Sapyta
 	 
	 	President
No. 54386.

#### Imported Liquors Company *v.*United States,

protest 114406-K (Louisville).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 43246.

#### Protests 783448-G, etc., of Joseph Gluck & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
### Lowry, 

## Nick (OST) From: 

### Sent: 

### To: Cc: Subject:

Dear Mr. Silberberg: Lowry, Nick (OST) -; l Tuesday, April 16, 2013 1:57 PM ·- . ··' • · Robert P. Silverberg (rsilverberg@sgbdc.com); Don Hainbach (dhainbach@gghairlaw.com); Mike Borsetti (mike@borsetti.com) ·-. , . : :, ::;:**:~**

## Z Podberesky, Samuel (OST); Graber, Kimberly (OST); Gorman, Robert (OST); Arshad, Amna (OST)**Yo~Ietter·"~f** April 11, 2013 -- Documents filed by Mike Borsetti in DOT OST

## c:::~nd 2013-0025

This is in response to your letterofApril11, 2013, in which you state thatthree documents filed in Dkt OST 2013-0024 by Mike Borsetti are documents unauthorized by the Department's procedural rules (14 CFR Part 302) and should not be accepted forfiling. The documents are entitled: (1) "Complaint and Motion tc• Join Complaint," April 5, 2013; (2) "Comments in Support of
· DOT Investigation intoAmerican Airlines," March 21, 2013; and "Comments in Support ofDOT Investigation into

American Airlines, Inc., and British Airways Pic and Request forJoint Investigation of Immunized Integrated JointVenture Partners," March 21, 2013. While you are correct in pointing outthe pleadings are not explicitly allowed underthe Department' rules, we atthe Enforcement Office have decided thatwe will accept them along with comments filed by members ofthe public in a related docket (DOT OST 2013-0025) in the interest of receptiveness to public comment and participation. We will accord them informal consideration in our review ofthe two dockets. As you point out, under rule 6(c)(3) the Department must consider matters contained in these documents as controverted and American need not answer the filings. Iwill place acopy ofthis e-mail in Dockets OST 2013-0024 and 2013-0025.



### Nicholas Lowry SeniorAttorney Office ofAviation Enforcement& 

### Proceedings Office ofthe General Counsel U.S. Dept. ofTransportation 202-366-9351 (ph)

1
Exhibit
            32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Summit Environmental
      Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Don Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                May 7, 2007*/s/
                Don Jordan*Don
                Jordan
              Chief
                Financial Officer





The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 10.11.13


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


 


This First
Amendment to Subscription Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated January 24, 2007,
amends that certain Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) dated
effective as of November 15, 2007 by and between Education Media, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Peter A. Kirsch (“Buyer”).


 


The parties
agree as follows:


 


1.     Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in
the Subscription Agreement.


 


2.     The
Consulting Contract is hereby amended as follows:


 


a.               RECITALS:
“WHEREAS, Buyer wishes to
purchase from the Company 288,699 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par
value $0.0001 per share (the “Shares”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Buyer wishes to purchase the Shares from the Company and the Company wishes
to sell the Shares to the Buyer on the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in this Agreement.”


 


b.     Section 2.2  Purchase
Price: “As payment in full for the Shares being purchased under this
Agreement and against delivery of the certificates therefor, simultaneous with
the execution hereof, Buyer shall pay $2887.00 to the Company by wire transfer
of immediately available funds or by such other method as may be reasonably
acceptable to the Company, (the “Purchase Price”).”


 


3.     In all other
respects the Subscription
Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this
Agreement to be effective as of the date first set forth above.


 


	
   

  	
  EDUCATION MEDIA, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/  Peter
  Kirsch

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Peter Kirsch

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  PETER A. KIRSCH

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/  Peter
  A. Kirsch
#### Deborah BATSON, Eula Maye Batson, and Billy M. Batson v. SOUTH LOUISIANA MEDICAL CENTER and State of Louisiana, through the Department of Health and Human Resources, et al.

No. 98-C-2709.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re Health & Human Resources Dept.; Medforce Physical Therapy Serv; Rowe, Robert; Angelito, Leah; St. Paul fire & Marine Ins. Co.; — Defendant(s); applying for 'writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 101,385; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA97 1382.

Granted to amend the judgment in this case to delete the $10,000 attorneys fees; otherwise denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., and LEMMON, J., would deny the writ.

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTEGRATED
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES - CONDENSED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFRENCE TO SUCH
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         689,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,968,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,677,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,968,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,912,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             200,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,869,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
        

                                       

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50949

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHARLES SAMSON, also known as Killer,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-86-1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Charles Samson has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Samson has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and 

the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Samson’s 

response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50949 Document: 00513558166 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
No. 15-50949

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-50949 Document: 00513558166 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
Exhibit No. 32.2

Form 10-QSB

The Quantum Group, Inc.

File No. 000-31727

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date June 19, 2006

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| |     | /s/ DONALDB. COHEN     
| | By: | Donald B. Cohen        
| |     | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Quantum Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Quantum Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF
                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Bytewatch
Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, I, Rick Plotnikoff,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bytewatch Technologies,
Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Bytewatch Technologies, Inc.

Dated:    August 12, 2004

BYTEWATCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By:  /s/ Rick Plotnikoff
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Summit
Environmental Corporation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, B. Keith Parker, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.Section78m
orSection78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April 15, 2003
                                            /s/ B. Keith Parker
                                            -------------------
                                            B. Keith Parker
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

         The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350) and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
No. 74-5989.

#### Thompson *v.*Gray, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
      18








Board
      of
      Directors


Bioanalytical
      Systems, Inc.


2701
      Kent
      Avenue


West
      Lafayette, IN 47906






As
      described in notes 2 and 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of
      Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., ("the Company") included in its Form 10-K for
      the
      year ended September 30, 2007, the Company changed its method of accounting
      for the valuation of certain inventories from the lower of cost, as determined
      by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, or market, to the lower of cost, as
      determined by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, or market. It should be
      noted that there are no authoritative criteria for determining a "preferable"
      inventory accounting method based on the particular
      circumstances; accordingly we are issuing this letter solely for purposes
      of the Company's compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange
      Commission, and it should not be relied on for any other purpose. 
Based on our review, we concur with management that such change in
      method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative method which, based on
      your
      business judgment to make this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable
      in your circumstances.







Very
      truly yours,





/s/
      Crowe
      Chizek and Company LLC


Indianapolis,
      IN


December
      27, 2007
No. 47739.

#### Protest 27662-K of Sang Chong Lung & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the hearing the Government moved to dismiss the case on the ground that the protest fee had not been paid, as required by section 3, paragraph N, Tariff Act of 1913, inasmuch as the tender of the fee was untimely. It was found that the protest was filed July 25, 1939, and the tender of the fee made and fee received July 28, 1939. The court therefore found that the protest fee was timely and the motion to dismiss was denied. As the record shows that the requirements of section 2901, Revised Statutes, have been complied with, the plaintiff’s claim that the appraisement is void was overruled and judgment rendered in favor of the defendant.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 91 (Friday, May 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 26435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Agenda; Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date:  9:30 a.m., Tuesday, May 13, 2008.

Place:  NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

Status:  The one item is open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:  7853A Railroad Accident Report-Derailment of 
Norfolk Southern Railway Company Train 68QB 119 with Release of 
Hazardous Materials and Fire, New Brighton, Pennsylvania, October 20, 
2006.
    News Media Contact: Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact 
Antoin Downs at (202) 314-6557 by Friday, May 9, 2008.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived Webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.
    For More Information Contact: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: May 2, 2008.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-10120 Filed 5-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
<PAGE>   1








                                                                      Exhibit 18







Nortel Networks Limited
8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100
Brampton, Ontario L6T 5P6
Canada

Dear Sirs/Madams:

At your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended
June 30, 2001, of the facts relating to a change in the methodology for
evaluating impairment of enterprise level goodwill in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 17, "Intangible Assets", from the undiscounted cash
flows method to the market value method. We believe, on the basis of the facts
so set forth and other information furnished to us by appropriate officials of
the Company, that the accounting change described in your Form 10-Q is to an
alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of Nortel Networks
Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period
subsequent to December 31, 2000. Therefore, we are unable to express, and we do
not express, an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q,
on the related information furnished to us by officials of the Company, or on
the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of Nortel Networks
Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period
subsequent to December 31, 2000.

Yours truly,


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
----------------------------
    Deloitte & Touche LLP


Chartered Accountants

Toronto, Canada
August 8, 2001
No. 40483.

#### Protest 669465-G of John Wanamaker (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of articles in chief value of artificial silk similar to that involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
----

----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August 14, 2009 |   | /s/ Samuel W. Fairchild       |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                              |   | Samuel W. Fairchild           |
|                              |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                              |   | (principal executive officer) |

----

----
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES- OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Friendly Energy Exploration(the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Report"),
 
 I,
        Douglass Tallant, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
        15th
        day September 2008.
 
 By:
        /s/ Douglas Tallant
 Douglas
        Tallant, Director and President