alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Holiday cheer spreads across DLA Aviation at Ogden

By DLA Aviation Public Affairs

                Richmond, Va.   –              
During this time of holiday cheer, many across the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation enterprise took time to give back to their communities or enjoy time with co-workers during office holiday parties.

DLA Aviation Public Affairs asked you to send us photos and the response was overwhelming. We received dozens of photos showing off creative outfits, office parties, festive office decorations and boxes and boxes of gifts to be donated to those in need in your local communities.

Over the next couple of weeks, we will be running stories highlighting these photos, so sit back, enjoy and Happy Holidays!!

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Holiday PhotosDLA Aviation
Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certify that
this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Date: September 16, 2005      By: /s/ Lee Cole
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Lee Cole, CEO, President and Director


Date: September 16, 2005      By: /s/ Linden Boyne
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Linden Boyne , CFO, Secretary-Treasurer &
                                  Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA George Grigsby , Petitioner ,

v. Judge Mary Thomas, Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois ,

Respondent
. Case No. 20

- cv - 3197 ( CRC )

MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner George Grigsby has filed a pro se “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, 2254.” In t he petition , which names as respondent Judge Mary Thomas, of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois , Grigsby challenges Judge Thomas’s decision “to place him in a mental health in stitution without a grand jury indictment[.]” Pet. at 1
. Grigsby has filed repeated prior habeas actions in this District , each naming Judge Thomas as respondent and raising this same challenge
. See Grigsby v. Thomas , 14

- cv - 1579, 2014 WL 4661195, at *1 (D.D.C. Sept. 19, 2014 ) (noting five prior petitions)
. In each, this Court found that it did not have jurisdiction over Grigsby’s petition. See, e.g. , Grigsby v. Thomas , 18

- cv 2221 (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2019) (ECF No. 3) . The Court reaches the same conclusio n here, and so dismisses the petition without prejudice for want of jurisdiction. The proper respondent for a habeas petition is the petitioner’s custodian. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla , 542 US. 426, 438

– 41 (2004). As in his previous unsuccessful petitions, G rigsby has not here indicated “how Judge Mary Thomas”

— who he alleges placed him in a mental health institution

— “could be his custodian.” Grigsby , 2014 WL 4661195, at *1. Moreover, even if Judge Thomas were the proper respondent, th is Court would not have jurisdiction over Grigsby’s2

petition because a federal district court “may not entertain a habeas petition [under § 2241] unless the respondent custodian is within its territorial jurisdiction.” Stokes v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , 374 F.3d 1235, 1239 (D.C. Cir . 2004). As a fellow judge of this Court has already recognized, if Grigsby “is confined at all, his confinement appears to be” in Illinois, “not Washington, D.C
. ”

— the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. Grigsby , 2014 WL 4661195, at *1. Because the Court does not have jurisdiction over Grigsby’s petition, it will dismiss this matter without prejudice. A separate Order shall acc ompany this memorandum opinion
.

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER United States District Judge Date: August 18, 2021
[LETTERHEAD OF KPMG]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
SmarTire Systems Inc.

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos. 333-122098, 333- 107904, 333-107903,  333-93021,  333-80923,  333-67751and
333-55810)  on Form S-8 of SmarTire  Systems Inc. of our report dated  September
16, 2005,  except for note 19(b) which is as of September 23, 2005, with respect
to the consolidated  balance sheets of SmarTire Systems Inc. as of July 31, 2005
and 2004, and the related consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'
equity and comprehensive  income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in
the three year period ended July 31, 2005,  which report appears in the July 31,
2005,  annual report on Form 10- KSB/A of SmarTire Systems Inc. Our report dated
September  16,  2005,  except for note 19(b) which is as of  September  23, 2005
includes  additional  comments  for U.S.  readers  on  Canada  - U.S.  reporting
differences that states that the financial statements are affected by conditions
and events that cast substantial doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a
going  concern.  The financial  statements do not include any  adjustments  that
might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
February 24, 2006
**Exhibit31.3**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stephen A. Snider,certify that:

1.                       I havereviewed this report on Form 10-K of Universal Compression, Inc. (the “registrant”);

2.                       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                       Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             [RESERVED]

c)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)             disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | February 28,  2007 | /s/ Stephen A. Snider   |   |
|--------|--------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:              | Stephen A. Snider       |
|   | Title:             | Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                    |                         |        |  |

 

 

1

----
#### Mutual Buying Syndicate, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7680.

Invoice dated London, England, April 15, 1946.

Certified April 16, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 16, 1946.

Entry No. 761107.

*422(Decided March 8, 1949)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise which was invoiced at 22 shillings and 5 pence per dozen, less 2)4 per centum, plus cases, or at 14 shillings per dozen, less 2)4 per centum, plus cases, and the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise which was invoiced at 30 shillings per dozen, less 2)4 per centum, plus cases, and that such values were the values found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
State DOT Curb Ramp Standard Drawings (Visited July 21, 2011) 

CT: HW-921-02 Sidewalk Ramps

http://www.ct.gov/dot/lib/dot/documents/deng/standards/ctdot_highway_std_June2011.pdf

If above link does not work, use this link: 

http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=3610&q=411104 

DC: 609.05 – 609.09 Wheelchair-Bicycle Ramps

http://ddot.dc.gov/DC/DDOT/Projects+and+Planning/Standards+and+Guidelines/Standard+Dra

wings/Standard+Drawings+-+April+2009+-+Series+600+-+Part+1

If above link does not work, use this link: 

http://ddot.dc.gov/DC/DDOT/Projects+and+Planning/Standards+and+Guidelines/Standard+Dra

wings

KY: RPM-160-03 Typical Installations for Sidewalk Ramps

http://transportation.ky.gov/HighwayDesign/Standard%20Drawing%20%20Sepia%20PDFs/Roadway-SERIES2008.pdf#rpm160-03

KY: RPM-170-06 Sidewalk Ramps (Renumbered 014 Sidewalk Ramps)

http://transportation.ky.gov/HighwayDesign/Standard%20Drawing%20%20Sepia%20PDFs/SEPIA-SERIES-2008.pdf#sepia_014

KY: RGX-040 Truncated Domes (Renumbered 015 Truncated Domes)

http://transportation.ky.gov/HighwayDesign/Standard%20Drawing%20%20Sepia%20PDFs/SEPIA-SERIES-2008.pdf#sepia_015

If above links do not work, use this link and click on Roadway-General and Roadway-Pavement 

to find the drawings:

http://transportation.ky.gov/Highway-Design/Pages/Standard-Drawings-Sepias.aspx

MI: R-28-G Sidewalk Ramp and Detectable Warning Details

http://mdotwas1.mdot.state.mi.us/public/design/englishstandardplans/index.htm

OH: BP-7.1 Curb Ramps (3 sheets)

http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Engineering/Roadway/roadwaystandards/Standard%20Con

struct%20Drawings/bp7.1_10-15-10.pdf

NV: R5.2.1, R5.2.2, R5.2.3, and R5.2.4 Curb Ramps

http://www.nevadadot.com/uploadedFiles/english_2010sm.pdf
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 21254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08817]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Public Availability of DHS Fiscal Year 2014 Service Contract 
Inventory

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is publishing this notice to 
advise the public of the availability of the FY 2014 Service Contract 
inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were awarded in FY 2014. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the agency. DHS developed the inventory following the 
guidance issued on November 5, 2010 and December 19, 2011 by Office of 
Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). 
This guidance is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/procurement-service-contract-inventories. Additionally, beginning with 
the FY 2014 inventory, agency inventories must include information 
collected from contractors on the amount invoiced and the direct labor 
hours expended on covered service contracts. The new requirement was 
published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2013 and is available 
at https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/12/31/2013-31148/federal-acquisition-regulation-service-contracts-reporting-requirements. DHS has posted its FY 2014 inventory for public review 
at: http://www.dhs.gov/acquisition-reports-and-notices#2 under 
``Acquisition Reports and Notices.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this notice, 
please contact Gail Carter at Gail.Carter@hq.dhs.gov, or telephone 202-
447-5302.

Laura Auletta,
Executive Director, Procurement and Acquisition Workforce.
[FR Doc. 2015-08817 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-9B-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **FIRSTBINGO.COM INC.**(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Michael Kabin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

Dated this 13th day of November, 2006.

 
MICHAEL KABIN 
Michael Kabin 
Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C. §1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO




SECTION
      906 OFTHE
      SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Annual Report ofRubicon
      Minerals Corporation(the
“Company”) on Form 40-F for the
      period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      W. Adamson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002,
      that:






(1)           
      The Report fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities
      Exchange
      Act of 1934;  and






(2)           
      The information contained in
      this
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.






March
      31,
      2009                                                                
/s/David
      W.
      Adamson




David W.
      Adamson


Chief Executive
      Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Rubicon Minerals Corporation and will be retained by Rubicon Minerals
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mannatech, Incorporated (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Persinger, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO MANNATECH,INCORPORATED AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CoStar
Group, Inc.


2
Bethesda Metro Center, 10th floor


Bethesda,
MD 20814





March 3,
2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


450 5th
Street, NW


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:  Certification Of Principal Executive
Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of CoStar Group, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2009, I, Andrew C.
Florance, Chief Executive Officer of CoStar Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1) such
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CoStar Group, Inc., for
the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o (d)); and





2) the
information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A of CoStar Group, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of CoStar Group, Inc.





By:
            /s/
      Andrew C. FloranceAndrew
      C. FloranceChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer andDuly
      Authorized Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CoStar Group, Inc. and will be retained by
CoStar Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





In
accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
“furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to CoStar Group, Inc.’s annual report and shall not
be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by
specific reference in such a filing.