alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**-  Pacific West  
-  Parlier, CA 
-  Commodity Protection and Quality 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**Development and Evaluation of New Technologies to Manage Postharvest Decay of Citrus
**Location: Commodity Protection and Quality**
**2006 Annual Report**
**4d.Progress report.**													This report serves to document research conducted under a trust agreement between ARS and the Citrus Research Board to develop new methods to control postharvest decay of citrus fruit. Additional details of research can be found in the report for the parent CRIS 5302-43000-032-00D Emerging Technologies to Maintain Postharvest Quality and Control Decay of Fresh Commodities. Objectives of this project are to reduce postharvest decay losses of fresh citrus fruit caused by fungal pathogens, such as green mold, caused by Penicillium digitatum, and sour rot, caused by Geotrichum citri-aurantii. The most significant new findings in 2006 include the characterization of fungicide resistance in populations of P. digitatum and methods to manage fungicide resistant isolates.  Molecular analysis of fungicide resistant isolates of P. digitatum collected from many locations were completed. Resistance to fungicide thiabendazole was associated with mutations at codon 200 of the beta-tubulin gene, and resistance to the fungicide imazalil was associated with up-regulation of cytochrome p450 expression by one of two patterns of alteration in regulatory sequences associated with cytochrome p450 synthesis. The growth and virulence and many other aspects of a large collection of isolates was conducted, and acquisition of fungicide resistance was accompanied by small but significant reductions in growth rate and competitive ability. Development of measures to minimize the development of fungicide resistance, by using mixtures of these fungicides with GRAS compounds or avoiding their use, are in progress.						
    Project TeamSmilanick, Joseph  - *Joe* 
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 
Related National Programs Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products(306)  							Last Modified: 03/24/2010 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2637

___________ Arlie Nelson; Alice Nelson; Charles * Nelson; Woodrow Nelson, * * Appellants, * v. * * Federal Land Bank of Omaha, also * known as Federal Intermediate Credit * Appeal from the United States Bank of Omaha, also known as Farm * District Court for the Credit Bank of Omaha; Federal Land * District of Nebraska. Bank of the Midlands, A Corporation; * Farm Credit Services of Norfolk, A * [UNPUBLISHED] Corporation; Norwest Bank of Sioux * City; Sid Copeland; Merritt C. Warren; * Edward G. Hannon; James A. Heimes; * John Does, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 6, 1998 Filed: February 26, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.The HONORABLE WILLIAMG. CAMBRIDGE, Chief Judge, United States 1 District Court for the District of Nebraska. -2- ArlieNelson, Alice Nelson, Charles Nelson, and Woodrow Nelson appeal the di strict court & s dismissal of their complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed. R

.

1 Civ. P. 12 (b)(6). After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, w e conclu de defendants Merritt Warren and Edward Hannon are entitled to absolut e immunity and the Nelsons & claims are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. We deny the Nelsons & motion for leave to file aff idavits and exhibits. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest:
CLE RK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT

.
# C_2013147EN.01000201.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 8 January 2013 — Csilla Sajtos v Budapest Főváros VI Ker. Önkormányzata

(Case C-10/13)

2013/C 147/02

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Csilla Sajtos

Applicant:

Defendant: Budapest Főváros VI Ker. Önkormányzata

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Having regard to Article 6(3) of the [Treaty on European Union], does the right to protection against unjustified dismissal constitute a fundamental right which, as a general principle, forms part of European Union law and is to be regarded as a rule of primary law? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Having regard to Article 6(3) of the [Treaty on European Union], does the right to protection against unjustified dismissal constitute a fundamental right which, as a general principle, forms part of European Union law and is to be regarded as a rule of primary law?

| 2. | If question 1 is answered in the affirmative, are civil servants also entitled to that right? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If question 1 is answered in the affirmative, are civil servants also entitled to that right?

---
# C_2013225EN.01007502.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/75

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2013 — Repsol YPF v OHIM — Ajuntament de Roses (R)

(Case T-89/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark R - Earlier national figurative mark R - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 225/167

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Repsol YPF, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Devaureix and L. Montoya Terán, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ajuntament de Roses (Roses, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 December 2011 (Case R 1815/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Ajuntament de Roses and Repsol YPF, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Repsol YPF, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Repsol YPF, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.

1

---
/Letterhead/

                      Schvaneveldt & Company
                   Certified Public Accountant
                275 East South Temple, Suite #300
                    Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
                          (801) 521-2392

Darrell T. Schvaneveldt, C.P.A.



               Consent of Darrell T. Schvaneveldt
                       Independent Auditor




     I consent to the use, of our report dated March 17, 1999, in
the filing of the Form 10KSB, on the financial statements of The
Financial Group Connection, Inc., dated December 31, 1998,
included herein and to the reference made to me.



/S/ Schvaneveldt & Company
Salt Lake City, Utah
October 18, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. QF07-87-000] 

Take notice that on February 7, 2007, Food Lion LLC, 2110 Executive Drive, Salisbury, NC 28145 (Headquarters), filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a notice of self-certification of a facility as a qualifying cogeneration facility pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(a) of the Commission's regulations. 

This qualifying cogeneration facility consists of a 400 kW packaged diesel engine generator set operating on #2 fuel oil. The package is set on a concrete pad. The unit is self-contained, including all necessary switchgear and controls. The electricity is generated at 208 V, 3 phase, 60 Hz. The facility is located at 1125 Clayton Village Center, Clayton, NC 27520. 

This qualifying facility interconnects with the Town of Clayton's electric distribution system. The facility will provide standby power and occasionally supplementary power to Food Lion. 

A notice of self-certification does not institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status; a notice of self-certification provides notice that the entity making filing has determined the Facility meets the applicable criteria to be a qualifying facility. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(d)(iii). 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-9982 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
August 13, 2015 

Dear Mr. Prestigiacomo: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA-2015-1820). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 8/27/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

R.Q. WARD, K.M. MCDONALD, D.J. SMITH

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DWAYNE S. DRAYTON

ELECTRICIAN'S MATE SECOND CLASS (E

- 5), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 201400085

GENERAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 5 Dec 2013

. Military Judge: CAPT Colleen M. Glaser

- Allen, JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Mid

- Atlantic,

Norfolk, VA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: CDR S.J. Gawro nski,

JAGC, USN

. For Appellant: LtCol Richard Viczorek, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller , Esq

.

8 May 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

---------------------------------------------------

Aft er careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. T ROIDL

Clerk of Court
# C_2014009EN.01002802.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/28

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 17 October 2013 — BF v Court of Auditors of the European Union

(Case F-59/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Appointment - Recruitment of a director - Vacancy notice - Act adversely affecting an official - None - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 9/45

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BF (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy and J. Vermer, Agents, assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul vacancy notice ECA/2011/67 of the Court of Auditors for the post of Director of the Human Resources Directorate.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders BF to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Court of Auditors of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BF to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Court of Auditors of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012, p. 38.

1

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CHRISTINE B. ALBERTY, 

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs, 

Respondent-Appellee

______________________

2023-1976

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 21-6164, Judge William S. 

Greenberg. 

______________________

O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by 

Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the 

rules, it is 

Case: 23-1976 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 09/18/2023
2 ALBERTY V. MCDONOUGH 

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same 

hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

September 18, 2023 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Date Jarrett B. Perlow 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 18, 2023

Case: 23-1976 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 09/18/2023
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-112347, No. 333-107469, No.333-118660 and No. 333-113625) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-77509 and File No. 333-79605) of Navigant International, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2004, except for Note 2 which is as of October 7, 2005, relating to the consolidated financialstatements which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Denver, Colorado 

October 7, 2005
EXHIBIT 23.1


                            KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA , LLC






                                                                 August 13, 2007


To Whom It May Concern:



The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, Certified Public Accountant, LLC hereby consents to
the inclusion of this report of July 23, 2007, accompanying the audited
financial statements of Sunnyside Acres Mobile Estates, as of June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 in the Form 10QSB.


Very truly yours,


/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
________________________
Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC




        P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452,
             Fax: (702) 436-4218, e-mail: ktingle@kyletinglecpa.com
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated October 1, 2007 - Nat Mani



 Exhibit 10.6.2 
 fabrinet® 
 Fabrinet (USA) 
 4104 – 24th Street, Suite 345

 San Franscisco, CA 94114 
 Office: 925-934-2048

 Fax: 815-333-3648 
 October 1st, 2007 
 Nat Mani 
 3860 Suncrest Ave, 
 San Jose, CA 95132 
 Ref: Amendment to the employment agreement dated January 8th, 2001 
 Dear Nat, 
 The following paragraph is to be
included as part of the employment agreement. 
  

	8. (c)	In the event the employment is terminated without good cause, the Executive will receive a severance equal to 6 months of present base salary, medical coverage for the same period plus any
earned bonus. 

  

	
	 Sincerely,

	
	 Tom Mitchell

	 Chairman & CEO
#### Carson Pirie Scott & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6902.

Entry No. 02110, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, February 25, 1942, etc.

Certified March 8, 1942, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., April 2, 1942, etc.

(Decided February 20, 1947)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted i;or decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7114

LEONARD CARTER, JR. Plaintiff - Appellant, and
GREGORY HARRIS; A. PRICE; CURTIS B. WILLIAMS; FRANK BROWN; LEMUEL WASHINGTON; VINCENT JAMES; JAMES SELBY; THOMAS LOUIS DALE, JR.; LINELL R. JONES; RALPH HAIRSTONE; DEMETRIS ODOM, Plaintiffs, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director; A. D. ROBINSON, Warden; JOHN P. ALDERMAN, Chairman; P. W. BUCK ROGERS, Director; E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, FormerChairman; JOHN B. METZER, III, Former Chairman; M. L. HILL, Operation Officer, Defendants - Appellees, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-112)2 Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 27, 1999 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leonard Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Leonard Carter appeals from a district court order dismissing without prejudice his complaint alleging civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999). The court dismissed Carter’s complaint because he failed to pay his filing fee asdirected or otherwise aver that he could not pay such a fee. Because Carter may proceed with this action in the district court by amending his complaint to provide the information requested by the court, his appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss theappeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Carter’s motions to appoint counsel, to produce documents, to proceed in forma pauperis, for summary judgment, and “for trial by jury.” We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
PH4NTCM 1 vtSUlN• "" .t ... ro.ol £1)



### ·- 

# --- ...

:-· ·- 

### -· 

## --· ...**-~--** 

### -· 

# -**·~:..-** ·=:...-:.. 

# =- : ·-· ·--·-'- 

## -· . 

# ___ ._

M- o ··--" _

.. _' 

### -· . 

### =- :



# -- -· 

## ·- . . • 

### ' . ::::-- :. 

## "-

... 

## - .. ·-· 

## ·--· 

# ._ .... ;



## -·-**~fen** Mo**~·** .... 

### - ,



## :::- !
·- ·-· .. 

## ·-·- .. 

## :=- l ·-· 

## ·- ·- -- .. 

# -- ..... 

# _ --- 

## ·- ... _, 

## ·-· 

# --

.. ,_ .. 

## ; - -**~­ Qhtae«m·b"';~**  

# - -**!!.\w.r1"i:.~** 

# --

-. 

# --- = : ===: 

### -==--: 

## -" --· ·-=-. ... 

## ·-- 

# --- -· . 

# - . ·-·--. ::....- .... 

# -- .. 

## _ ... 

### _ • 

### ··-·-. -=- : . .

'!!e!'"' e.:,



# T ·- 

## ·- ·- .

·-



## ·- ·- 

## ·- ·-- 

## ·- ·- ·- 

# ---

·-

· - · . I i> · • '!" ,


## -

=::.·-·-- =-- m 

# -

- .**~=** 

# - .**&: :~==**  

## - --·-**~-=** 

### - . 

# - - 

# =-- = -· = =:::, 

# -- ... 

### -**~-** 

## I 

## ·-**~** 

# ....... ••• [] 

## ·- ·- " 

## ·- T·



### ' 

# .. .. 

### ...-·-**~-­** a;::. ii::- ii\if:=W



### ·- 

# - _Xi_...:a::Jiii_ ... , ___

- '"'-'
- "'4 .. 

### - ..**~** 

### ·-- = ......... __ . __ - 

### ·r= 

# -

· - ... 

### -I ! 

### I I

.. ,_ , 

### · - ... 

### - 

# ' I

··-- · 

### · - ... 

### -**ii:~w'iii** ,......L:2l roo m.:'!l -·**~** 

### ·---

.. -..::. .. . 

### ---**~=--~---** 

### 'i!f.l**-·** ··-- ..



# -- ..**-~ ~'="11:·-**  ..... 

### ·=--- I t 

# m - 

# - ··- ·**~ ~**  

### - I •**~·** 

### i; )] .. 

## - 

# -

-- .:.:c..--**~.;·~·** ---- ... ·**~-** L- -- ... -



### -
. - -;-;-';' -. .·...:..: a

- I • 

### - 

# - - - · 

# - -**~**



# .. 

# - = 

## · -

r =-- 

### - 

## - =-

## -··--- 

# --- Sr"M"i'iZii w&,


# •