alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 AMERICAN BANCORP, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of American Bancorp, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald
J. Lashute, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of December 31, 2003 (the last date of the period covered
by the Report). /s/ Ronald J. Lashute  
 March 24, 2004   - 30 -
```

Exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Nutra Pharma Corp. on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rik J. Deitsch, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Rik J. Deitsch
Rik J. Deitsch
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 11, 2005
```
# C_2014052EN.01002302.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/23

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2013 — Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Jacson of Scandinavia AB

a

(Case C-159/13 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Community trade mark JACKSON SHOES - Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national business name Jacson of Scandinavia AB - Declaration of invalidity - Manifest inadmissibility)

2014/C 52/40

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda (represented by: A.J. Rodrigues, lawyer)

Appellant:

a

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Guimarães and G. Schneider, Agents), Jacson of Scandinavia AB

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 January 2013 in Case T-474/09 Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda v OHIM, Jacson of Scandinavia AB, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 August 2009 (Case R 1253/2008-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Jacson of Scandinavia AB and Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda.

a

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços Lda is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços Lda is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
No. 76-696.

#### Powell Manufacturing Co., Inc. *v.*Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. C. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
# C_2014175EN.01003802.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — CITEB and Belgo-Metal v Parliament

(Case T-488/12) (1)

1

((Public works contracts - Tender procedure - Work for the renovation and extension of the Eastman building in Brussels - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Notification of the evaluation committee’s report - Duty to state reasons))

2014/C 175/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Cit Blaton SA (CITEB) (Schaerbeek, Belgium); and Belgo-Metal (Wetteren, Belgium) (represented by: R. Simar, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: F. Poilvache and L. Fedel, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 7 September 2012 rejecting the tender made by the applicants in response to a contract notice of 19 May 2012, published in the Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2012/S 92-1563620) under reference NINLO.AO-2012-005-BRU-UPIB-02, concerning the carrying out of work for the renovation and extension of the Eastman building in Brussels (Belgium) and awarding that contract to another tenderer.

Official Journal of the European Union

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cit Blaton SA (CITEB) and Belgo-Metal to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cit Blaton SA (CITEB) and Belgo-Metal to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.

1

---
#### McGlinn, Appellant, *v.*Philadelphia et al.

*479Argued April 29, 1936.

Before Kephart, C. J., Schaffer, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern and Barnes, JJ.

*Thomas B. Hall,*for appellant.

*Aaron W. White*and *John J. K. C aside,*Assistant City Solicitors, and *Joseph Sharfsin,*City Solicitor, for appellee, were not heard.

June 26, 1936:

Per Curiam,

Appellant was walking south on the west side of Fifth Street and, as she neared the curb at the comer of Clear-field Street, a delivery cart appeared directly in her path. She stepped aside to let it pass and fell. She described her fall thus: “I stepped aside to the left, and as I did that, I — my foot sank into something and threw me down, and I rolled over on my side. .. . Then I tried to raise myself. , . . I reached back with my right hand to help me along to get up, and my hand sank into this *480and there was a projection there and I knew that was what threw me. . . The only other evidence hearing directly on the manner and cause of her fall were the hospital records which show that she stated she fell on the ice.

The evidence as to the condition of the sidewalk where the accident occurred is scant. A surveyor for appellant stated there was a difference in the level of the ends of two abutting curbstones of an inch and a half. The court below held that appellant had failed to prove a defective condition such as would give rise to actionable negligence.

Our review discloses that appellant failed to make out a prima facie case by establishing such negligence on the part of the municipality as to charge it with liability. The standard of care to which a city is held in the maintenance of its sidewalks is one of reasonable safety. It is not an insurer of the absolute safety of the pedestrians who make use of its sidewalks and streets: *Burns v. City of Pittsburgh,*320 Pa. 92. Not every depression or irregularity will serve to charge it with liability: *Williams v. Kozlowski,*313 Pa. 219, 223. Each case must depend on all the surrounding circumstances: *Shafer v. Philadelphia,*60 Pa. Superior 256, 258. Possibility of accident will not warrant recovery: *McIntyre v. City of Pittsburgh,*238 Pa. 524, 527.

In view of the fact that appellant failed to establish the existence of a dangerous defect in the sidewalk such as to constitute a breach of duty on the part of appellees in its maintenance, it is unnecessary to discuss the question of proximate cause and contributory negligence, which were both raised in this appeal. It is so clearly apparent that appellant did not prove any act of actionable negligence, it would be useless to prolong the discussion.

Judgment affirmed.
No. 54310.

#### McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 147059-K and 147336-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2017104EN.01000801.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 January 2017 — Roca SARL v European Commission

(Case C-638/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria - Coordination of selling prices and exchange of sensitive business information - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Principle of equal treatment - Exercise of unlimited jurisdiction))

(2017/C 104/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Roca SARL (represented by: P. Vidal Martínez, abogada)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, F. Castillo de la Torre and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Roca SARL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Roca SARL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014.

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Nortel
Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: January 31, 2005
    /s/ WILLIAM A. OWENSWilliam A. OwensPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: January 31, 2005
    /s/ WILLIAM R. KERRWilliam R. KerrChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-3793,333-3797 and 33-73496) and Form S-8
(File Nos. 333-61372, 33-21859, 33-44888 and 33-64701) of Nobel Learning
Communities, Inc. (formerly Nobel Education Dynamics, Inc.) of our report dated
September 3, 2002 relating to the financial statements, which appear in this
Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 23, 2002
#### *L.*Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6847.

Entry Nos. N-1026; N-1181.

-Invoices dated London, England, March 20, 1946, etc.

Certified March 20, 1946, etc.

Entered at Newark, N. J., April 12, 1946, etc.

(Decided February 6, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entries because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Wachter, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this interim report on Form 10-QSB of FirstBingo.com;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this interim report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this interim report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this interim report.

4.   The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2003.



| | /s/ Richard L. Wachter
Richard L. Wachter
President, Principal Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40544-40545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19841]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY

Agency for International Development


Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is making 
efforts to reduce the paperwork burden. USAID invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following continuing information collections, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are requested concerning: (1) 
Whether the continuing collections of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether 
information shall have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the 
burden estimates; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 
of the information collected, and (4) ways to minimize the burden of 
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 60 days of this 
notification. Comments should be addressed to: Ms. Sue M. Parks, Bureau 
for Humanitarian Response, Office of American Schools and Hospitals 
Abroad (BHR/ASHA), Room 100, SA-8, 703-351-0232. Copies of submission 
may be obtained by calling 703-516-1864.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    OMB Number: OMB 0412-0011.
    Form Number: AID 1010-2.
    Title: Application for Assistance--American Schools and Hospitals 
Abroad.
    Type of Submission: Renew.
    Purpose: USAID finances grant assistance to U.S. founders or 
sponsors who apply for grant assistance from ASHA on behalf of their 
institutions overseas. ASHA is a competitive grants program. The office 
of ASHA is charged with judging which applicants may be eligible for 
consideration and receive what amounts of funding for what purposes. To 
aid in such determination, the Office of ASHA has established 
guidelines as the basis for deciding upon the eligibility of the 
applicants and the resolution on annual grant awards. These guidelines 
are published in the FR Doc. 79-36221.
    Annual Reporting Burden:
    Respondents: 85.

[[Page 40545]]

    Average hrs per response: 12.
    Annual Burden hours: 1,020.

    Dated: July 16, 1997.
Willette Smith,
Acting Chief, Information Records Division, Bureau for Management, 
Office of Administrative Services.
[FR Doc. 97-19841 Filed 7-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
(Reap. Dec. 9914)

#### Rite Lite Novelty Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 742853.

(Decided February 15, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*William H. Orrielc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

Wlien the above-enumerated appeal for a reap-praisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

Rule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2015046EN.01000601.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — František Ryneš v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů

(Case C-212/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 95/46/EC - Protection of individuals - Processing of personal data - Concept of ‘in the course of a purely personal or household activity’))

(2015/C 046/07)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: František Ryneš

Applicant:

Defendant: Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second indent of Article 3(2) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data must be interpreted as meaning that the operation of a camera system, as a result of which a video recording of people is stored on a continuous recording device such as a hard disk drive, installed by an individual on his family home for the purposes of protecting the property, health and life of the home owners, but which also monitors a public space, does not amount to the processing of data in the course of a purely personal or household activity, for the purposes of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-113852) pertaining to the Capital Lease Funding, Inc. 2004 Stock
Incentive Plan of our report dated March 8, 2005, except for Note 22, as to
which the date is March 10, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Capital Lease Funding, Inc., included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 /s/ Ernst
& Young LLP
 
 New York,
New York
 March 30,
2005
(Reap. Dec. 9923)

#### James G. Wiley Co., a/c Yale Sales Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. DE-15968; DE-17335.

(Decided February 27, 1961)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Edward N. Glad of*counsel) for the plaintiff.

*William, S. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FitzGibbon,*trial attorney), for tbe defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

When these appeals for reappraisement were called for trial, they were consolidated and submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> Mr. Glad : If it please the Court, I move that pencil numbers 199 and 200 on the September reappraisement calendar be consolidated for trial.

> Mr. FitzGibbon : There is no objection.

> Judge Johnson : Without objection, the two cases will be consolidated for trial.

> Mr. Glad : If it please the Court, this appeal to reappraisement covers only the items referred to on the invoice as radius gauges, being item number 300-R-5, and their leatherette eases. As to any other items, we abandon the appeal.

> I offer to stipulate that at the time of exportation of this particular item, this radius gauge, there was no foreign, export or United States value for such or similar merchandise.

> Mr. FitzGibbon: That is agreed.

> Mr. Glad: I offer to stipulate that the cost of production, as defined under Paragraph 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, for such or similar merchandise, for the item itself, was $1.52, and for the leatherette cases accompanying this item, was 48 cents.

> Mr. FitzGibbon : That is agreed to.

*603On the agreed facts, I find that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise described on the invoices as item number 300-3N-5, radius gauges and leatherette cases, and that such value is $1.52 for the radius gauges and 48 cents for the leatherette cases accompanying the gauges.

As to all other items of merchandise, the appeals, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.