alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of 30DC,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ending  March 31,  2011 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Edward Dale,  Principal
Executive Officer,  President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  September 19, 2011


/s/ Edward Dale
--------------------------------------------------
Edward Dale,
Principal Executive Officer, President and Chief Executive Officer

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit
32.1** 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the China Energy Savings Technology, Inc. Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sun Li, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to China Energy Savings Technology, Inc. and
will be retained by China Energy Savings Technology, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/  Sun LiSun
      Li
      Chief
      Executive Officer
      (Principal Executive Officer)
      Date:  May 23,
2005
Case No. 5,588.

#### GOODYEAR & N. E. CAR-SPRING CO. et al. v. ELASTIC CAR-SPRING CO.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accesi-ble.]
(Reap. Dec. 9101)

#### Jaguar Cars North American Corp. J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc. v. United States

Entry Nos. 583; 1055.

(Decided March 19, 1958)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle, Jr.,*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FitzGibbon,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

*744Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these appeals consists of certain “Jaguar” automobiles imported from England and entered at the port of Portland, Oreg.

At the trial, the case was submitted upon the following agreement entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> Me. Tuttle: May it please the Court, it is stipulated and agreed by and between the attorney for the plaintiff and the attorney for the defendant that the involved merchandise consists of, in the case of Reappraisement 285417-A, which is number 98 on the calendar, 2 Jaguar automobiles, which were appraised at £754, 5 shillings, 8 pence, less £1 allowance for non-supply of headlamps, plus extras.

> , It is agreed that the proper valuation for duty purposes is £714, 19 shillings, 3 pence, less allowance for non-supply of headlamps, plus all extras.

> Now, as far as Reappraisement number 285419-A, which is number 99 on the calendar, the merchandise consists of one 2.4 Liter Jaguar Saloon automobile, which was appraised at £754, 5 shillings, 8 pence, less £1 allowance for non-supply of headlamps, plus extras, and it is now agreed between attorney for the plaintiff and the defendant that the value for duty purpose, is £714, 19 shillings, 3 pence, less allowances for non-supply of headlamps, plus all extras.

> Mr. FitzGibbon: We agree. Upon that stipulation, the case is submitted for decision, both sides resting. * * *

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper value of the involved Jaguar automobiles covered by reappraisement 285417-A is, as to each item covered thereby, £714, 19 shillings, 3 pence, less allowance for nonsupply of headlamps, plus all extras; and that the proper value of the Jaguar Saloon automobile covered by reappraisement 285419-A is £714, 19 shillings, 3 pence, less allowances for nonsupply of headlamps, plus all extras.

As to all other merchandise covered by these appeals for reappraisement, same having been abandoned, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Rodoma, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6570.

Entry No. 739395, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, January 1, 1942, etc.

Certified January 2, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 20, 1942, etc.

(Decided December 4, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 99.11




MICHAEL A. LALONDE
 c/o Rubicon Minerals Corporation
 44 Victoria Street, Suite 400
 Toronto, Ontario
 Canada M5C 1Y2
 
 Phone: 1-416-766-2804
 
 
 CONSENT
 
 March 27, 2015
 
 Rubicon Minerals Corporation
 44 Victoria Street, Suite 400
 Toronto, Ontario
 Canada M5C 1Y2
 
 And
 
 United States Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 
 Dear Sirs/Mesdames:
 
 I hereby consent to being named in the Annual Information Form of the Company, dated March 27, 2015 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “AIF”) and to the use of the technical information prepared by me or under my supervision relating to the Company’s Red Lake properties, which information is contained in the AIF and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.
 
 I also consent to the incorporation by reference of the above information into Rubicon Minerals Corporation’s Registration Statement (No. 333-194076) on Form F-10.
 
 
 
 Sincerely,
 
 /s/ Michael A. Lalonde
 
 Michael A. Lalonde,P.Eng
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 Rubicon Minerals Corporation
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

 

I, Robert M. Jakobe, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form10-K of The Sheridan Group, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)             designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)             disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)             all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | March 30, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Robert M. Jakobe                       |   |
|--------|----------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |           |   | Robert M. Jakobe                           |
|   |           |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1792 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 246
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1792

To clarify the authority of the United States Marshal Service to assist 
    other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies in the 
  investigation of cases involving sex offenders and missing children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2011

Mr. Whitehouse (for himself, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Blumenthal, 
Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Leahy, and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

                            December 1, 2011

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify the authority of the United States Marshal Service to assist 
    other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies in the 
  investigation of cases involving sex offenders and missing children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Investigations of Sex 
Offenders and Missing Children Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 566(e)(1)(B) of title 28, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
                    ``(B) as directed by the Attorney General, 
                investigate--
                            ``(i) fugitive matters, both within and 
                        outside the United States; and
                            ``(ii) at the request of another Federal, 
                        State, or local law enforcement agency, cases 
                        involving--
                                    ``(I) a sex offender (as defined in 
                                section 111 of the Sex Offender 
                                Registration and Notification Act (42 
                                U.S.C. 16911)) who violates a sex 
                                offender registration requirement; or
                                    ``(II) a missing child.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 246

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1792

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To clarify the authority of the United States Marshal Service to assist 
    other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies in the 
  investigation of cases involving sex offenders and missing children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 1, 2011

                       Reported without amendment
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    In connection with the Annual Report of Rubicon Minerals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Lewis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and
  (2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   March 12th, 2013
/s/ Robert G. Lewis

________________________

Robert G. Lewis

Chief Financial Officer
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rubicon Minerals Corporation and will be retained by Rubicon Minerals Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of CoStar Group, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses:
 
 (1)   Registration
Statement Number 333-82599 on Form S-8
 (2)   Registration
Statement Number 333-92165 on Form S-8
 (3)   Registration
Statement Number 333-45770 on Form S-8
 (4)   Registration
Statement Number 333-69548 on Form S-8
 (5)   Registration
Statement Number 333-135709 on Form S-8
 (6)   Registration
Statement Number 333-143968 on Form S-8
 
 of our
reports dated February 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of CoStar Group, Inc., incorporated by reference in its Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009, and the financial statement
schedule of CoStar Group, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of CoStar Group, Inc included therein, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
 
 /s/ Ernst
& Young LLP
 
 McLean,
Virginia
 February
25, 2010
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1623 

To provide a processing extension for emergency mortgage relief payments, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide a processing extension for emergency mortgage 

relief payments, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

4 Section 109 of the Emergency Housing Act of 1975 

5 (12 U.S.C. 2708), as amended by section 1496 of the 

6 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protec7 tion Act (Public Law 111–203; 124 Stat. 2209), is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) by striking the period at the end and insert10 ing ‘‘; and’’; 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1623 IS

1 (2) by striking ‘‘mortgagor receiving’’ and in2 serting the following: ‘‘mortgagor— 

3 ‘‘(1) receiving’’; and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(2) who applied for a loan, advance, or emer6 gency mortgage relief payments under this title on 

7 or before September 30, 2011, and was approved to 

8 receive the benefit of such loan, advance, or emer9 gency mortgage relief on or before December 31, 

10 2011.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 49493.

#### Protests 103651-K, etc., of International Paint Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATIONS




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I,Sanding Tao, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1. The Reportfullycomplies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.






Date:January20, 2009




By:/s/
      Sanding TaoSanding Tao
                Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

October 13, 1943

No. 48855.

#### Protests 951856-G, etc., of Eurasia Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the hats in question are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) and others similar to those involved in Abstract 46498. In accordance therewith the claim at only 25 percent was sustained as to both items.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of Sonoma  Valley  Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  We,
Mel Switzer, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Mary Quade Dieter, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:  November 12, 2003           /s/ Mel Switzer, Jr.
        -----------------           -------------------------------------------
                                    Mel Switzer, Jr.,
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  November 12, 2003           /s/ Mary Quade Dieter
        -----------------           -------------------------------------------
                                    Mary Quade Dieter,
                                    Executive Vice President
                                    Chief Operating Officer and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARINA CONERLY; JAMES CONERLY; 

MARILYN TILLMAN-CONERLY; M. T., a 

minor, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

SHARIF R. TARPIN, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 23-15297 

D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01525-TLN-CKD 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Carina Conerly, James Conerly, and Marilyn Tillman-Conerly appeal pro se 

from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging federal claims. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Puri v. Khalsa, 

844 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir. 2017) (dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-15297 

Procedure 12(b)(6)); Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 

1987) (sua sponte dismissal for failure to state a claim). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ action because plaintiffs 

failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 

556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (explaining that, to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must 

contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is 

plausible on its face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

We reject as meritless plaintiffs’ contentions that the district court was 

biased against plaintiffs.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Jones’s request for reimbursement of costs and fees, set forth in Jones’s 

answering brief, is denied without prejudice to filing a bill of costs or a postjudgment motion for fees. 

All other pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-69951, 333-90635 and  333-39460), and in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-87749 and 333-32342), of Answerthink, Inc. of our report  dated March 14,
2005, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Annual Report  on Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Miami, Florida

March 14, 2005

---