alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties, Ltd. III 1998 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000720460
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. III
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      240
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          14,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          3,710
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,755
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,899
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (16)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael L. Hirschey state and attest that:

     (1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of OneSource Technologies, Inc. (the
"issuer").

     (2) Accompanying this certification is the Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003, a quarterly report (the "quarterly report") filed by
the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which
contains financial statements.

     (3) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on my
knowledge:

          A. the periodic report containing the financial statements fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
     Act, and

          B. the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the issuer for the periods presented therein.

/s/ Michael L. Hirschey
-----------------------

Date: 14 November 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson, Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230. 

These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. 

                    These closed proposal review meetings will no longer be announced on an individual basis in the                     **Federal Register**                    . NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site:                     *http://www.nsf.gov/​events/​advisory.jsp.*                     This information may also be requested by telephoning 703/292-8182.                 

Dated: May 2, 2008. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E8-10037 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# C_2013108EN.01002701.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/27

---

Order of the General Court of 19 February 2013 — Beninca v Commission

(Case T-418/12) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Express decision adopted after the action had been brought - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 108/69

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jürgen Beninca (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: C. Zschocke, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision of 27 July 2012 refusing access to a document.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Jürgen Beninca. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Mr Jürgen Beninca.

---

(1)  OJ C 366, 24.11.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date:    October 9, 2003     By: /s/Janet Greeson
                                      ----------------
                                      Janet Greeson, Chief Executive Officer


                               By: /s/ Eugene Boyle
                                       --------------
                                       Eugene Boyle, Chief Financial Officer


                               By: /s/ Doug Bessert
                                       ------------------
                                       Doug Bessert, Vice President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Samaritan
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 48214.

Suit *4430.*

#### *United States*v. *R. Gaertner & Co., Inc., et al.*

Reap. Dec. 5727. Appeal dismissed March 3, 1943.
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.9

    


     

    CAPITAL
      TEN ACQUISITION CORP.

    


    ____________,
      2008

    


    Capital
      TEN Partners, LLC

    116
      Village Boulevard

    Princeton,
      New Jersey 08540

     

    Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date
      (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering
      (“IPO”) of the securities of Capital TEN Acquisition Corp. (“Company”) and
      continuing until the consummation by the Company of a “Business Combination” (as
      described in the Company’s IPO prospectus) or its liquidation, Capital TEN
      Partners, LLC shall make available to the Company certain general and
      administrative services including office space, utilities and secretarial
      support, as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 116
      Village Boulevard, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 (or any successor location).
      In
      exchange therefor, the Company shall pay Capital TEN Partners, LLC the sum
      of
      $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly
      thereafter.

     

    


    Very
      truly yours,

    


    CAPITAL
      TEN ACQUISITION CORP.

    


    By: 
      _________________________    

    Name: 

    Title: 

    


    AGREED
      TO
      AND ACCEPTED BY:

    


    CAPITAL
      TEN PARTNERS, LLC

    


     

    By:
      ______________________     

    Name:
      

    Title:
Before the Third Division,

October 15, 1941.

No. 46461.

#### Protests 809940-G, etc., of C. A. Cross & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors

Bioanalytical Systems, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-56123 and 333-56127) on Form S-8 of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 7, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for the years then ended which report appears in the September 30, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

January 18, 2006
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7171

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KENNETH B. KUBINSKI , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Fayetteville

. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 3:93

- cr
- 00028

- H

- 1 )

Submitted : December 21 , 2017 Decided: December 28, 2017

Before WILKINSON and D UNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kenneth B. Kubinski, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth B. Kubinski appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed

. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to remove a factual statement from the presentence report associated with his 1994 convictions. Rule 36 motions, however, apply only to clerical errors and are not the proper vehicle for challenging the substance of the information in a presentence report; such challenges must be filed within 14 days of receiving the report.
See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade quately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7617
MACK NEIL MYERS, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC; RICHARD BAZZEL, Warden; OLSON, Food Service Director; RAVIST, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (9:07-cv-01131-HMH) Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 2, 2008 Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mack Neil Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mack Neil Myers appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Myers that failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation would waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Myers’ objections, though timely filed, did not specifically identify Myers’ bases for objecting to the dispositive portions of the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. United States v. Midgette , 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 2007); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Myers has waived appella te review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Further, we deny Myers’ motion for appointment of counsel.- 3 - We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in Higher-Level Positions: A Survey of Women in Positions of Responsibility in Selected Fields of Business and Industry and in Specified Areas

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Van Schaick, F. L. (Frances L.). 						*Women in Higher-Level Positions: A Survey of Women in Positions of Responsibility in Selected Fields of Business and Industry and in Specified Areas : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 236*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										[1950],									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5509,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# C_2016335EN.01000201.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 June 2016 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-648/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - European Union water policy - Directive 2000/60/EC - Monitoring of the ecological status and the chemical status of surface waters - River basin management plans))

(2016/C 335/02)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, K. Majcher and M. Drwięcki, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to transpose completely or correctly Articles 2(19), (20), (26) and (27), 8(1), 9(2), 10(3) and 11(5) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, as amended by Directive 2008/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008, points 1.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4 and 2.4.1 of Annex V to that directive and points 7.2 to 7.10 of Part A of Annex VII to that directive, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions and Article 24 of that same directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to transpose completely or correctly Articles 2(19), (20), (26) and (27), 8(1), 9(2), 10(3) and 11(5) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, as amended by Directive 2008/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008, points 1.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.4 and 2.4.1 of Annex V to that directive and points 7.2 to 7.10 of Part A of Annex VII to that directive, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions and Article 24 of that same directive;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.

1

---
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 0 9

- 4 1 2 0 3 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

R U B E N L U J A N O

- G O N Z A L E Z ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 2 : 0 9

- C R

- 6 7 6

- 1

B e f o r e K I N G
, B E N A V I D E S
, a n d E L R O D , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

R u b e n L u j a n o

- G o n z a l e z w a s c o n v i c t e d o f o n e c h a r g e o f i l l e g a l r e e n t r y i n t o

t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s a n d w a s s e n t e n c e d t o s e r v e 2 1 m o n t h s i n p r i s o n a s w e l l a s a

t h r e e

- y e a r t e r m o f s u p e r v i s e d r e l e a s e

. T h i s a p p e a l w a s f i l e d t o c h a l l e n g e h i s

s e n t e n c e , w h i c h h e a r g u e s w a s i m p r o p e r b e c a u s e i t w a s b a s e d o n t h e d i s t r i c t

c o u r t ’ s f

l a w e d d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t h i s p r i o r s t a t e c o n v i c t i o n s f o r s i m p l e

p o s s e s s i o n o f m a r i j u a n a q u a l i f i e d a s a n a g g r a v a t e d f e l o n y f o r p u r p o s e s o f U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D July 30, 2 010
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-41203 Document: 00511189837 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/30/2010N o

. 0 9

- 4 1 2 0 3

U

. S

. S

. G

. § 2 L 1

. 2 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( C )

. I n h i s o p e n i n g b r i e f
, L u j a n o

- G o n z a l e z c o r r e c t l y

c o n c e d e d t h a t t h i s a r g u m e n t w a s f o r e c l o s e d b y o u r p r i o r c a s e l a w

. H o w e v e r , f

o l l o w i n g t h e c o m p l e t i o n o f b r i e f i n g i n t h i s c a s e , t h e S u p r e m e C o u r t r e l e a s e d C a r a c h u r i

- R o s e n d o v

. H o l d e r ,

_ _ S

. C t

.

_ _ , 2 0 1 0 W L 2 3 4 6 5 5 2 ( J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 1 0 ) ( N o

. 0 9

- 6 0 )
, w h i c h u n d e r m i n e d o u r p r i o r c a s e l a w o n t h i s t o p i c

. R e l y i n g o n C a r a c h u r i

- R o s e n d o , L u j a n o

- G o n z a l e z h a s f i l e d a n u n o p p o s e d m o t i o n

t o v a c a t e t h e j u d g m e n t , r e m a n d f o r r e s e n t e n c i n g , a n d i s s u e t h e m a n d a t e
f o r t h w i t h

. T h a t m o t i o n i s G R A N T E D

. T h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s
V A C A T E D , a n d t h i s c a s e i s R E M A N D E D F O R R E S E N T E N C I N G

. T h e
M A N D A T E S H A L L I S S U E F O R T H W I T H

.

2 Case: 09-41203 Document: 00511189837 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/30/2010