alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report
of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Laurence S. Geller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 27, 2009                  
|                                          
|/S/     LAURENCE S.
GELLER                
|Laurence S. Geller Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00019

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP

OF BETTY J. MANESS, AN ALLEGED

INCAPACITATED PERSON

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7875G

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Betty J. Maness, appealed the trial court’s order appointing the Texas

Department of Aging and Disability Services as permanent guardian of Maness.

Maness’s appellate brief was due February 25, 2010. By letter dated March 8, 2010, the

Clerk of this Court notif ied Maness that no brief had been filed. The Clerk further

warned Maness that the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution unless,

within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for

continuing the appeal. More than 21 days have passed, and we have not received a

response from Maness.In the Matter of the Guardianship of Maness Page 2

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(b).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opi nion delivered and filed April 14, 2010

[CV06]
[INGRAM  MICRO  LOGO]


September  28,  1999

Joseph  M.  Naughton
GO  ONLINE  NETWORKS  CORP,
25  Main  Street  Suite  201
Chico,  CA  95928-5489

Dear  Mr.  Naughton:

Welcome  to  Ingram  Micro  Inc.,  the leader in computer and technology related
distribution.  As  an  account  holder,  we  offer you the advantage of one stop
shopping  with  prompt and courteous service. We have established an account for
GO  ONLINE  NETWORKS  CORP  and  assigned  Customer  Number  50-324346.

Terms  of  payment  are  Net  30  days  from the date of invoice With a limit of
$15,000.00. Your assistance in seeing that our terms of sale are honored will be
appreciated.  I  will be your Senior Credit Representative and may be reached at
(714)  566-1000,  extension  23795.  Your Sales Representative may be reached at
(800)  456-8000.

When  making  a payment to Ingram Micro, please be sure to indicate your account
number  along  with  which  invoices are being paid to ensure proper posting. To
help  you  maintain  your account you will receive's statement within 15 days of
each  month  end.

Information  about  Ingram  Micro  program  and services is available on our Web
site. You can search for the products you need, generate quotes and place orders
all  in  one  convenient  online  location  www.ingrammicro.com  To  obtain your
Internet ID, please call our Electronic Commerce Support team at 1-800-616-4665.

Thank  you for choosing Ingram Micro Inc. as your distributor of choice. We will
strive  to  fulfill  our  commitment  to  excellence  In  service  and  support

Please  note  that  accounts  with  no  activity  for  12  months are subject to
deletion.

Sincerely,

Leslie  Bowman
Senior  Credit  Representative

[INGRAM  MICRO  LOGO]
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the date and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |   |   |                         |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: August      14, 2009 |   |   | /s/      Hon Wan Chan        |   |
|                             |   |   | Hon      Wan Chan            |   |
|                             |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
July 10, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIE DEWAYNE ROLAND, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00584-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court 

orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Craig A. Knock, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                                                                                          
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2008 |  | /s/ Craig A. Knock                                                                                                       
|                       |  | Craig A. Knock                                                                                                           
|                       |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Principal Accounting Officer Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.



41
#### Henry N. Clarke, Appellant, vs. Perry G. Wall, Appellee.

After a plea of set-off pleaded, and before the cause is submitted to the Jury, the plaintiff has a right to take a non-suit.

Appeal from Hernando Circuit Court.

The plaintiff instituted in the Court below an action! of assumpsit, to which the defendant pleaded a set-off. Before the cause was submitted to tbe Jury, the plaintiff aisked leave to take a non-suit, which was refused by the Court. This ruling of the Court is assigned for efroT.

DuPONT, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

' This case is brought up by appeal from the Circuit Court *477of Hernando County, and tbe only question which has been submitted for our decision is as to the right of a plaintiff to discontinue his action after a plea of set-off has been filed by the defendant.

This question has already been settled, by the adjudication in the case of Buffington vs. Quackenboss, (5 Florida Reps., 196,) and we see no good reason for disturbing that decision. In the case referred. to, the defendant in the Court below pleaded, by way of set-off, an open account which exceeded in amount the plaintiff’s demand. At the trial term, the Court, upon motion of the plaintiff, ordered the cause to be dismissed, to which the counsel for the defendant excepted, and assigned the same as error. The Supreme Court sustained the judgment of the Court below, and thereby affirmed the right of the plaintiff to discontinue his action, notwithstanding a plea of set-off had been filed.

In the case now before us, the error assigned is the refusal to permit the plaintiff to take a non-suit before the cause had been submitted to the jury, and thus it will be¡' seen that the points made in the two cases are identical.

Let the judgment be reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for such further proceedings as may not be inconsistent with this opinion.
# C_2014052EN.01002301.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/23

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Aosta — Italy) — Rocco Papalia v Comune di Aosta

(Case C-50/13) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Clause 5 of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work - Public sector - Successive contracts - Misuse - Compensation for damage - Conditions for the payment of compensation in the event of the unlawful fixing of a date on which a contract of employment will expire - Principles of equivalence and effectiveness)

2014/C 52/39

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Aosta

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rocco Papalia

Applicant:

Defendant: Comune di Aosta

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale ordinario di Aosta — Interpretation of Clause 5 of the annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43) — Public administration — Compensation in the event of the unlawful fixing of a date on which a contract of employment will expire — Conditions — Evidence of damage incurred — Need to prove that better work opportunities were foregone

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The framework agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is set out in the annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, must be interpreted as precluding measures provided for by national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, in the event of misuse by a public employer of successive fixed-term employment contracts, provides solely for the right for the worker concerned to obtain compensation for the damage which he considers himself to have therefore incurred, without any transformation of the fixed-term employment relationship into an employment relationship for an indefinite period, where the right to that compensation is subject to the obligation on that worker to prove that he was forced to forego better work opportunities, although the effect of that obligation is to render impossible in practice or excessively difficult the exercise by that worker of rights conferred by European Union law.

It is for the referring court to assess to what extent the provisions of domestic law aimed at penalising the misuse by the public administration of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships comply with those principles.

---

(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.

1

---
# C_2016016EN.01000401.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Skatteverket v Hilkka Hirvonen

(Case C-632/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for persons - Equal treatment - Income tax - Revenue of non-resident taxpayers subject to taxation at source - Exclusion of any tax deduction related to the taxpayer’s personal circumstances - Justification - Possibility for non-resident taxpayers to opt for the regime applicable to resident taxpayers and to benefit from the relevant tax deductions))

(2016/C 016/04)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Skatteverket

Applicant:

Defendant: Hilkka Hirvonen

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

In matters of taxation of income, the refusal to grant non-resident taxpayers, who obtain the majority of their income from the source State and who have opted for the taxation at source regime, the same personal deductions as those granted to resident taxpayers under the ordinary taxation regime does not constitute discrimination contrary to Article 21 TFEU where the non-resident taxpayers are not subject to an overall tax burden greater than that placed on resident taxpayers and on persons in a similar situation whose circumstances are comparable to those of non-resident taxpayers.

---

(1)  OJ C 31, 1.2.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



STATEMENT PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Winston Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of Media and Entertainment.com, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, to which this certification accompanies (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November 15, 2004



/s/ Winston Johnson

Winston Johnson,

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Media and Entertainment.com, Inc. and will be retained by Media and Entertainment.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2014292EN.01005803.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/58

---

Order of the General Court of 27 June 2014 — HUK-Coburg v Commission

(Case T-185/12) (1)

1

2014/C 292/73

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jose Araque, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Jose Araque
    --------------------------------------
    Jose Araque, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 8, 2006
No. 39161.

#### Protests 293384-G, etc., of S. & A. Stern (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

54–052 PDF 2009

S. HRG. 110–910 

[ERRATA] 

OVERSIGHT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

INVESTIGATION 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

MARCH 5, 2008 

Serial No. J–110–78 

Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary 

( 

(II) 

[ERRATA] 

On the front page of hearing please change from First Session to 

Second Session. Inadvertently Typed the wrong session.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|   | (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|   |   |   | /s/                Baowen Ren                                                                          |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Baowen                RenChief                Executive OfficerDated:                November 14, 2007 |

----
NO. 07-05-0349-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

AUGUST 31, 2006

______________________________

JESSE VASQUEZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. ONE OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2004-490125; HONORABLE RUSTY B. LADD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jesse M. Vasquez, following his trial by jury, appeals his conviction for

resisting arrest and his jury-imposed sentence of seven days in the Lubbock County Jail

and a fine of $2,000.00. We will affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw in the case.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he has carefully reviewed the record

in this case and concludes there is no reversible error and that the appeal is frivolous. See
2

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45 (1967). Counsel has also filed a motion to

withdraw in the case and, by letter, informed appellant of his right to file a pro se brief.

Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 646 (Tex.App.–Waco 1994, pet. ref’d). By letter dated

April 4, 2006, this court also notified appellant of his opportunity to submit a response to

the Anders brief and motion to withdraw filed by his counsel, granting him until May 4, 2006

to do so. This court’s letter also reminded appellant to contact his counsel if he needed

to review any part of the appellate record to prepare a response. Appellant filed a

response on May 3, 2006. 

We have independently examined the entire record in the case to determine

whether there are any non-frivolous grounds which might support the appeal. See Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).

We have found no such grounds. After reviewing the record before us, counsel’s brief, and

appellant’s response, we agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous. See Bledsoe v.

State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATE OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Network 1 Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Hunt, Acting Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial officer) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.








Date: October 13, 2011
/s/ William HuntWilliam HuntActing Principal Accounting Officer
No. 96-8001.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Universal Foreign Service Co. v. United States

No. 6188.

Pro forma invoices dated June 11, 1941, etc.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., June 13, 1941, etc.

Entry No. 6137, etc.

(Decided June 26, 1945)

*Lawrence & Tuttle {George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *{Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the defendant. .

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon an oral stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the parties hereto, agreeing, in substance, *375that the price, at the time of exportation thereof, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoiced and entered prices, and that the foreign value, if such existed, was not higher than the invoiced and entered prices.

Accordingly, I hold the proper basis for the valuation of the involved merchandise to be the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such values are the invoiced and entered values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.