1

20-1494-cv

Yang, et al. v. Kosinski, et al.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed 

on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a 

document filed with this Court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an 

electronic database (with the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order 

must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at 

the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, 

on the 19th day of May, two thousand twenty.

PRESENT: AMALYA L. KEARSE,

DENNIS JACOBS,

JOSÉ A. CABRANES,

Circuit Judges.

ANDREW YANG, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL

OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED; JONATHAN HERZOG,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED; HELLEN SUH, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF 

OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED; BRIAN VOGEL,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED; SHLOMO SMALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF 

OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED; ALISON HWANG,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED; KRISTEN MEDEIROS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON

BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED; ROGER GREEN,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 20-1494-cv

JAY BELLANCA, TRACI STRICKLAND, EMILY ADAMS, NESTOR

MEDINA, SIMRAN NANDA, KATHRYN LEVY, JOSHUA SAUBERMAN,

CARI GARDNER, STEPHEN CARPINETA, NANCY DEDELVA, TING

BARROW, PENNY MINTZ, GEORGE ALBRO,

Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees,
2

v.

PETER S. KOSINSKI, CO-CHAIR AND COMMISSIONER,

INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AT THE NYS BOE;

TODD D. VALENTINE, CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AT THE NYS BOE; ROBERT A.

BREHM, CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AT THE NYS BOE,

Defendants-Appellants,

ANDREW SPANO, COMMISSIONER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AT THE NYS BOE,

Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant,

NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; DOUGLAS A. KELLNER,

CO-CHAIR AND COMMISSIONER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL 

CAPACITIES AT THE NYS BOE,

ADR Providers-Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants,

ANDREW CUOMO, AS GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 

Defendant.

FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES: JEFFREY M. KURZON, Kurzon Kohen 

LLP, New York, NY.

FOR INTERVENORS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES:

J. REMY GREEN (Elena L. Cohen, 

Jonathan Wallace, on the brief) Cohen & 

Green P.L.L.C., Ridgewood, NY; ARTHUR 

Z. SCHWARTZ, Advocates for Justice, New 

York, NY.

 

FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS: JUDITH N. VALE, Senior Assistant 

Solicitor General (Barbara D. Underwood, 

Solicitor General, Steven C. Wu, Deputy 

Solicitor General, Jennifer L. Clark, 

Assistant Solicitor General, on the brief), for 

Letitia James, Attorney General, State of 

New York, New York, NY.
3

FOR AMICI CURIAE BERNIE SANDERS AND BERNIE 2020 INC.:

Malcolm Seymour, David R. West, Foster 

Garvey, P.C., New York, NY.

FOR AMICI CURIAE NEW YORK STATE VOTERS:

Ezra Ishmael Young, Law Office of Ezra 

Young, Brooklyn, NY.

FOR AMICI CURIAE MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS:

Robert Rickner, Rickner PLLC, New 

York, NY.

FOR AMICI CURIAE HEATHER KEY, ET AL.: Walter H. Hackett, III, Law Office of 

 Walter Hackett, Walnut, CA.

Appeal from a May 5, 2020 order of the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of New York (Analisa Torres, Judge).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, 

AND DECREED that the May 5, 2020 order of the District Court granting the application for 

preliminary injunction be and hereby is AFFIRMED. An opinion of the Court explaining its 

reasoning in further detail will follow. 

Defendants-Appellants (“Defendants”) appeal from a May 5, 2020 order of the District 

Court granting an application of preliminary injunction to require them to reinstate to the 

Democratic primary ballot those presidential and delegate candidates who were duly qualified as of 

April 26, 2020, and to hold the primary election on June 23, 2020. Defendants argue that the 

decision of the New York State Board of Elections (“Board”) to remove from the ballot the 

candidates who had suspended their campaigns (along with their pledged delegates) is supported by 

reasonable concerns about harms to the public health and election administration workers in light of 

the current COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, Defendants argue, the Board’s decision did not 

violate the First Amendment rights of Plaintiffs and Intervenors-Plaintiffs. We assume the parties’ 

familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

We review de novo the District Court’s legal conclusions in connection with its decision to 

grant the application for preliminary injunction, see Am. Express Fin. Advisors Inc. v. Thorley, 147 F.3d 

229, 231 (2d Cir. 1998), but review its ultimate decision to issue the injunction for abuse of 

discretion, see Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. Golden Empire Schs. Fin. Auth., 764 F.3d 210, 214 (2d Cir. 2014).
4

After reviewing the record, we affirm the order granting the application for preliminary 

injunction for substantially the reasons given by the District Court in its thorough May 5, 2020 

Opinion and Order. See Yang v. Kellner, No. 20-cv-3325 (AT), ---F. Supp. 3d---, 2020 WL 2129597, at 

*1–14 (S.D.N.Y. May 5, 2020). 

CONCLUSION

We have reviewed all of the remaining arguments raised by Defendants on appeal and find 

them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the May 5, 2020 order of the 

District Court.

The mandate shall issue forthwith. An opinion of this Court will follow explaining its 

reasoning in further detail. 

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court