alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly report of Priviam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Urrea, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(4) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Daniel
      UrreaDaniel
      UrreaChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      29, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of U.S. RealTel, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gregory P. McGraw, President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                     By: /s/ Gregory P. McGraw
                                         ----------------------------
                                         Gregory P. McGraw
                                         President, Chief Financial Officer and
                                         Chief Operating Officer


April 3, 2003
# C_2014421EN.01001201.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel — Belgium) — Orgacom BVBA v Vlaamse Landmaatschappij

(Case C-254/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charges having equivalent effect to customs duties - Internal taxes - Import levy on manure imported into the Flanders Region - Articles 30 TFEU and 110 TFEU - Levy payable by the importer - Different levies on imported manure and manure produced within the Flanders Region))

2014/C 421/15

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Orgacom BVBA

Appellant:

Respondent: Vlaamse Landmaatschappij

Respondent:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 30 TFEU precludes a levy, such as that provided for under Article 21(5) of the Decree of the Flanders Region of 23 January 1991 on protection of the environment against fertiliser pollution, as amended by the Decree of 28 March 2003, which is applicable only to imports into the Flanders Region of surplus livestock manure and other fertilisers, which is levied on the importer whereas the tax on the surplus manure produced within the territory of the Flanders Region is levied on the producer and is calculated differently from the tax on imports. In that regard, it is immaterial that the Member State from which the surplus manure is imported into the Flanders Region provides for a tax reduction in the case of export of that surplus to other Member States.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
No. 39192.

#### Protest 748303-G of Coffee Products of America, Inc., Ltd. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

The merchandise in question was held free of duty as follows: (1) laurel leaves under paragraph 1722, Abstract 37263 followed; (2) marjoram leaves under paragraph 1722, *Knickerbocker*v. *United States*(T. D. *37248959) followed; and (3) thyme leaves under paragraph 1669, *Seeck*v. *United States*(T. D. 47383) followed.
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry R. Welch, in my capacity
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
      Jerry R. WelchDate:  
      May 13, 2008
            Jerry
      R. Welch
              Chief
      Executive Officer and Director
# C_2015371EN.01000201.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 September 2015 — European Commission v Slovak Republic

(Case C-361/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation No 883/2004 - Article 7 - Old-age benefit - Christmas bonus - Residence requirement))

(2015/C 371/02)

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Tokár, D. Martin and F. Schatz, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Slovak Republic (represented by: B. Ricziová, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
No. D-1710.

#### In re Disbarment of Sandvoss.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 518 U. S. 1044.]
RECORD OF COMMUNICATION

TELEPHONE CALL

DATE: August 2 , 2012

SUBJECT: South Coast A QMD Rule 1176 Sumps

FROM: Nicole Law

– EPA Region IX, Rules Office

Stanley Tong

– EPA Region IX, Rules Office

TO: Eugen Teszler

– South Coast AQMD

, Air Quality Specialist

, Planning, Rule

Development and Area Sources Rule Development, ( 909 ) 396

- 2077

Dairo Moody

– South Coast AQMD, Air Quality Specialist, Planning, Rule

Development and Area Sources Rule Development, ( 909 ) 396

- 2333

reviewed with Dairo on Aug ust 24, 2012

SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION:

1. The 5 mg/L in Rule 1176 is an exemption level where wastewater can be put into open ponds without

controls. The general idea is if the water is greater than 5 mg/L, you need to control it.

2. As far as the fin al disposition of the wastewater, you need to check what the requirements are for

discharge of oil/grease into the municipal sewer system. The disposal of the wastewater is more of a

water issue than an air emissions issue. Also, some facilities dispose of the produced water by

reinjection but they need a prior permit from the Water Quality Control Board.

3. At the time of rule development, he believes they applied a general guideline that $15,000/ton of

VOC reduced is too expensive for controls.

4. Mr. Teszler does not know if the above $15,000/ton has been updated to more current dollars.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT THE UNDERSIGNED CONSTITUTES AND APPOINTS
TERENCE C. SEIKEL HIS TRUE AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND AGENT, WITH FULL
POWER OF SUBSTITUTION AND RESUBSTITUTION, FOR HIM AND IN HIS NAME, PLACE AND
STEAD, IN ANY AND ALL CAPACITIES, TO SIGN: (i) FORM 10-K BEING FILED ON OR ABOUT
THE DATE HEREOF BY ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC, (THE "COMPANY"), (ii) ANY OR
ALL AMENDMENTS (INCLUDING POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENTS) TO THE COMPANY'S
REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND
DECLARED EFFECTIVE ON OR ABOUT JUNE 10, 1998, AND TO FILE THE SAME, WITH ALL
EXHIBITS THERETO, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (INCLUDING ANY
AMENDMENTS THERETO), WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, GRANTING UNTO
SAID ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND AGENT FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY TO DO AND PERFORM EACH
AND EVERY ACT AND THING REQUISITE AND NECESSARY TO BE DONE AS FULLY TO ALL
INTENTS AND PURPOSES AS HE MIGHT OR COULD DO IN PERSON, HEREBY RATIFYING AND
CONFIRMING ALL THAT SAID ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND AGENT OR HIS SUBSTITUTE OR
SUBSTITUTES, MAY LAWFULLY DO OR CAUSE TO BE DONE BY VIRTUE HEREOF.




                                                   /s/ Barry Banducci
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Name:  Barry Banducci
                                                   Dated: March 12, 1999
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00260-CV

Farrell Plumbing & Cooling, Inc.

v.

Aquarius Condominium Owners Association, Inc.

On Appeal from the

107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-DCL-02114-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in 

accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the party 

incurring same.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 17, 2022
# C_2013352EN.01001501.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2013 — Electric Bike World Ltd v OHIM — Brunswick (LIFECYCLE)

(Case T-379/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark LIFECYCLE - Earlier national word mark LIFECYCLE - Partial refusal of registration by the Board of Appeal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

2013/C 352/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Electric Bike World Ltd (Southampton, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Brunswick Corp. (Lake Forest, Illinois, United States of America)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 May 2012 (Case R 2308/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Brunswick Corp. and Electric Bike World Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Electric Bike World Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Electric Bike World Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 23.2







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors 
SmarTire Systems Inc.

We consent to the use of our audit report dated September 12, 2003 on the consolidated balance sheets of SmarTire Systems Inc. as of July 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended July 31, 2003, incorporated by reference in SmarTire Systems Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-107904, 333-107903, 333-93021, 333-67751, 333-80923 and 333-55810), which report appears in the July 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-KSB of SmarTire Systems Inc. Our report dated September 12, 2003 includes additional comments for U.S. readers on Canada - U.S. reporting differences that states that the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



/s/ KPMG LLP (signed)



Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada
October 16, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Infinity  Capital Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Gregory
H. Laborde, Principal Executive Officer,  President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 20, 2009


/s/Gregory H. Laborde
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory H. Laborde, Principal Executive Officer, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Ryne P. Raffaelle

National Center for Photovoltaics

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

DOING BUSINESS WITH NREL

THE 22ND NREL INDUSTRY GROWTH FORUM

NOVEMBER 3-5, 2009

NREL/PR-520-47126

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Science and Technology 

Perspectives on R&D 

Partnerships
National Center for Photovoltaics

The National Center for Photovoltaics (NCPV) focuses on innovations in 

technology that drive PV industry growth. The NCPV is directed to use 

U.S. national laboratories and universities to accelerate PV as a viable 

energy option in the United States.
Sustainable development is 

development that meets the 

needs of the present without 

compromising the ability of future 

generations to meet their own 

needs.

– UN Bruntland Commission

Our Focus: Making PV More Sustainable

Economical

• Raw Materials Usage

• Abundant Materials

• Manufacturability

• Efficiency 

• Durability

Environmentally Safe

• Non-Toxic Alternatives

• Aqueous-Based Materials

• Reuse, Reman, Recycle

• Environmental Impact Assessment

Societal 

• Market Assessment

• Reliability

• Building Integrated (BIPV)

• Productization
20x–100x III-V MJs, 

500x

CdTe, CIGs, a-Si

~1–2 um

c-Si ~180 um

NCPV Technology Portfolio
National Center for Photovoltaics

NREL

NREL

NREL

NREL

NREL

NREL

NREL

NREL

NREL Technology Breakthroughs

NREL Current World Records

NREL

NREL

NREL

NREL
NREL T&E

1366 Technologies

3M 

AMONIX 

ADCO

Advent Solar

Applied Materials

Applied Optical Sciences

BASF

BP Solar

BRP Manufacturing 

Dow Chemical

CaliSolar

Dupont

First Solar

GT Solar

Infoscitex

Innovalight

Konarka

NanoSolar

PrimeStar Solar

Solar Power Industries 

SolFocus

Schott Solar

Skyline Solar

Spectrolab (Boeing)

SunPower

TruSeal

Uni-Solar

Incubator

New Pre-Incubator

Technology Pathway Partnerships

PV Supply Chain

Future Generation Program

PV Manufacturing Initiative

Working with the NCPV

Pre-Incubator

Banyan Energy

Crystal Solar

ISET

TiSol

Ascent Solar Technologies

EPIR Technologies

MicroLink Devices

1366 Technologies

Lightwave Power

Vanguard Solar

Semprius

SpectraWatt

Luna Innovations

Incubator

Calsiolar

Sol Focus

MicroLink Devices

SoloPower

PrimeStar Solar

AVA Solar

Plextronics

Innovalight

Spire Solar

Solexel

1366 Technologies

Solasta

Skyline

TPPs

Ammonix

SunPower

Soliant

General Electric

Konarka

Nanosolar

BP Solar

Greenray

Uni-Solar

Dow Chemical

Ind. CRADAs

Plextronics

SiXtron

Corning/Varian

Universities

Toledo

Delaware

Florida

Arizona State

Cal Tech

RIT

MIT

Penn State

Georgia Tech

Stanford

UC Davis

CSM

Colorado

Colorado State

Illinois

Michigan

South Florida

Washington

Next Gen

Wakonda

Voxtel

Solasta

Solexant

Soltaix

Voxtel
Process Development and Integration 

Laboratory (PDIL)
Exhibit 23

                                Consent of Independent Public Accountants

     As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report for Thermedics Inc. dated February 11, 1999, included
in or made a part of this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement No. 2-93746 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
33-00183 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 2-93747 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 33-8992 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
33-31621 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-9215 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 33-43707 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No.
33-40866 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-64070 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 33-86972 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
33-86974 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 033-65279 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 033-61435 on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-02149 on
Form S-3, and Registration No. 333-32035 on Form S-3.


                                                            Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 12, 1999
# C_2014261EN.01000602.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/6

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien — Austria) — Ferdinand Stefan v Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft

(Case C-329/13) (1)

1

((Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 2003/4/EC - Validity - Public access to environmental information - Exception to the obligation to disclose environmental information where the disclosure compromises the ability of any person to receive a fair trial - Optional nature of that exception for Member States - Article 6 TEU - Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter))

2014/C 261/09

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ferdinand Stefan

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Consideration of the questions raised has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---
No. 55594.

#### Gallagher and Ascher Company *v.*United States,

protest 168092-K/3162 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 747 Lower Tribunal No. 2 2

- CF

- 014915

_____________________________
W ILLYS C ASSAMAJOR , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County

. Bruce Kyle , Judge.

March 26, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

NARDELLA
, BROWNLEE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig , II, Public Defender, and Matthew J. Salvia , Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTI ON FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### STATE ex rel. Willie WILLIAMS v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 98-KH-3105.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re Williams, Willie; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 208-926.

*649Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he filed on or about August 20, 1998. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
#### Worcester Royal Porcelain Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6563.

Entry No. 701965, etc.

Invoices dated Worcester, England, June 1945, etc.

Certified June 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 17, 1945, etc.

(Decided December 2, 1946)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgement will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED

STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global-Tech Appliance Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kin Shek Leung, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Kin Shek LeungKin Shek LeungActing Chief Financial OfficerDate: September 28, 2007