alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, W. H. Easter III, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Duke Energy Field
Services, LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: August 10, 2004
    /s/ W. H. Easter IIIW. H. Easter IIIChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

138320 

ARCHIE A. VAN ELSLANDER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138320 

 COA: 274966 

Oakland CC: 2003-051583-CZ 

THOMAS SEBOLD & ASSOCIATES, INC., 

DANIEL S. FOLLIS, and MARY ELIZABETH 

FOLLIS, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

HOME INSPECTORS NORTH, INC. and 

LINCOLN WOOD PRODUCTS, INC., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 74-5891.

#### Terry *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Before the Third Division,

April 2, 1942

No. 47027.

#### Protest 59180-K of M. E. Dey & Co. (Milwaukee).

*481Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the paintings are similar to those the subject of *Whitman Publishing Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 465, C. D. 517) the claim at 15 percent under paragraph 1547 (a) and T. D. 49753 was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1795 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1795

To require the Corps of Engineers to revise the Missouri River Mainstem 
Reservoir System Master Water Control Manual to ensure greater storage 
            capacity to prevent serious downstream flooding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 3, 2011

  Mr. Grassley (for himself and Mr. Johanns) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Corps of Engineers to revise the Missouri River Mainstem 
Reservoir System Master Water Control Manual to ensure greater storage 
            capacity to prevent serious downstream flooding.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF MASTER MANUAL.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, shall 
revise the Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir System Master Water 
Control Manual to ensure that the flood control storage allocation of 
the Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir System--
            (1) has been recalculated so that the flood control storage 
        allocation is based on the vacated space required to control--
                    (A) the largest flood experienced in the System; 
                and
                    (B) the serious downstream flooding associated with 
                such a flood; and
            (2) has been adjusted, prior to each runoff season, such 
        that the space allocated for flood control purposes in the 
        exclusive flood control zone and the annual flood control and 
        multiple use regulation zone is increased by a quantity 
        necessary to ensure that the storage capacity of the zones is 
        adequate to avoid contributing to serious downstream flooding.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

November 12, 1942

No. 47719.

#### Protest 83776-K of Rodney Fielding, Inc. (New York).

*446Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

At the trial a sample of the colored cotton cloth was received in evidence as representative of certain of the items in question. The report of the Government analyst showed the average yarn number to be 80, the number of single threads per square inch to be 380, and the number of ounces per square yard to be 3.24. The collector was therefore instructed to reliquidate the entry in accordance with agreement of counsel and the analyst’s report. The claim under paragraph 924 was overruled.
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to Section 906



Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President,
Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Bioanalytical Systems Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (a) | the amendment no.2 of Form 10-K/A Annual Report of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2011 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | By:  /s/ Anthony S. Chilton          
| | -------------------------------------
| | Anthony S. Chilton                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  May 2, 2012                   



| | By:  /s/  Jacqueline M. Lemke                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Jacqueline M. Lemke                                
| | Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:   May 2, 2012
#### SOUTHMARK CORPORATION, petitioner, v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, L. L. P.

No. 98-1643.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 14, 1999.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 21

                          Subsidiaries of Registrant



Parent
------

PCB Holding Company


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Percentage               Jurisdiction or
Subsidiaries (a)                              of Ownership          State of Incorporation
----------------                              ------------          ----------------------
<S>                                           <C>                     <C>

Peoples Community Bank.......................     100%                   United States

Peoples Building and Loan Association
 Service Corporation(b)......................     100%                   Indiana
</TABLE>

--------------
(a)   The operations of the Company's subsidiaries are included in the Company's
      consolidated financial statements.
(b)   This is an inactive company owned directly by Peoples Community Bank.
No. 47056.

#### Protests 49214-K, etc., of Herman A. Holz (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of hardness-testing machines similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *United States*v. *American Machine &*Metals (29 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 183). In accordance therewith the claim at 20 percent was sustained under paragraph 353 or 372 as modified by the said trade agreement.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Daveon D. McCULLOUGH, Joseph Michael Elie, III, Lonnie Ray Simmons, Jr., Frederick Demond Bush.

No. 98-KD-2900.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 6, 1999.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 240,891.

Denied. Moot.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v GEORGE FINNEY, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 724, 25 CMR 228

No. 10,800

Decided February 21, 1958

*Major Edward Fenig*and *First Lieutenant Hazen V. Hatch*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

HomeR FeRGtjson, Judge:

We granted review in this case to consider two issues. The first concerns the correctness of the law officer’s instructions on the question of intent as derived from evidence “of a much prolonged absence for which there is no satisfactory explanation.” The second issue relates to the propriety of the convening authority’s action in providing for the application of forfeitures on and after the date of such action. Our holding in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287, is dispositive of the first issue. For the reasons stated in that opinion, the appellant’s conviction of desertion cannot stand.

The remaining issue may be disposed of by reliance on our holding in the ease of United States v Schuld, 8 USCMA 721, 25 CMR 225, where we held that an accused, who had committed the offense of desertion during World War II, but who was not brought to trial until after the effective date of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, could be made to forfeit all pay and allowances due on and after the date of the convening authority’s action. Accordingly, we conclude in the instant case that the convening authority’s action in respect to the application of forfeitures was proper.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General *725of the Army for submission to a board of review. The board may, in its discretion, approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

LatimeR, Judge

(concurring m part and dissenting in part):

I dissent from the holding of the Court on the first granted issue but concur with the remaining parts of the opinion.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 98-40228

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RUSSELL LYNELL EVANS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1-97-CR-92-1

_________________________________________________________________

October 6, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Russell Lynell Evans has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R.

42.2.

D I S M I S S E D.
2
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of **FIRSTBINGO.COM INC.**(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

Dated this 25th day of May, 2006.

 
RICHARD WACHTER 
Richard Wachter 
Chief Financial Officer
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

h1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143057 & (20)(21)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143057 COA: 302527 BENJAMIN RICARDO RAGAN, Washtenaw CC: 99-012514-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 14, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The
motions to remand and for a new trial are DENIED.
June 12, 1944

No. 49490.

Suit 4466.

#### A. *D. Cohen Co., Inc.*v. *United States.*

Abstract 48856 affirmed (April 27, 1944). C. A. D. 278.
Exhibit 32.1

I, Peter T. Kissinger, the Chairman of the Board; President; and Chief Executive
Officer of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods
set forth therein.

| | /s/  Peter T. Kissinger
Peter T. Kissinger
Chairman of the Board,
President and
Chief Executive Officer
January 12, 2005
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Michael R. Cox, the Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods
set forth therein.

| | /s/  Michael R. Cox
Michael R. Cox
Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
January 12, 2005
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc
      A. Prefontaine, M.Sc, P.Geo.


GEOLOGIST





#104
      1615 Trafalgar Street


Vancouver,
      BC


Canada


V6K
      3R6





Phone:   
      (604) 681-7446


Fax:    
      (604) 684-9877


Email:   marc@grayd.com














To:          
      United States Seucitires and Exchange Commission


The
      Toronto Stock
      Exchange


British
      Columbia Securities Commission


Alberta
      Securities Commission


Ontario
      Securities Commission


Autorité
      des marchés financiers


Rubicon
      Minerals Corporation








I,
      Marc
      A. Prefontaine, P.Geo., do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory
      authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled “Exploration
      Activities of Rubicon Minerals Corporation on the McFinley Property, Red Lake
      Ontario for the period January 2005 to June 2005” and dated December 9, 2005
      (the “Technical Report”) and to its use for obtaining any required regulatory
      acceptance or approvals in connection with the Property which is the subject
      matter of the Technical Report.





I
      also
      certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and that it fairly
      and accurately represents the information in the Technical Report or that
      supports the disclosure.








Dated
      this31stday
      of March, 2008.











Signed:“Marc
      Prefontaine”





Marc
      A.
      Prefontaine, M.Sc., P.Geo
SIBLING
ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
(A Development Stage Company) Exhibit 3.1 Certificate
of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation ofAmici Ventures, Inc. 
Under Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law It
is hereby certified that: 1.          The
name of the corporation (herein referred to as the Corporation) is: Amici Ventures, Inc. 2.          The
corporations Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Office of the
Secretary of State on September 12, 1995. 3.          The
Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation is hereby amended as follows: (a)         By
changing the Corporations name by striking out paragraph 1 thereof and by
substituting in lieu of said paragraph 1 the following new paragraph: 1.          The
name of the corporation is Sibling Entertainment Group, Inc. (b)         By
substituting the following in lieu of paragraph 4 thereof, so as to increase
the number of authorized shares from 30,000,000 shares of common stock, par
value $0.001 per share to 100,000,000 shares common stock, par value $0.001 per
share, as follows: 4.          The
aggregate number of shares which this corporation shall have the authority to
issue is 100 million (100,000,000) shares of common stock, par value of $0.001
per share. (c)         By
adding the
following as a new paragraph 7, permitting shareholder action to be taken by
the majority vote of the issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote on such
action, as follows: 7.          Whenever
under the provisions of the New York Business Corporation law shareholders are
required or permitted to take action by vote, such action may be taken without
a meeting on written consent, setting forth the action so taken signed by the
holders of outstanding shares having not less than the minimum number of votes
that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which
all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted. 4.          The
amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified was duly
authorized by unanimous written consent of the Board of Directors followed by
the affirmative vote of the majority of all of the outstanding shares entitled
to vote at a meeting of the shareholders of the corporation held on June 30,
2005, at which a quorum was present, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 803(a) of the New York Business Corporation Law. IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being an authorized officer of the
corporation, has hereunto signed his name and affirms that the statements made
herein are true under the penalties of perjury, this 30th day of
June, 2005. Amici Ventures, Inc. By:
  /s/ Mitchell
  MaxwellMitchell Maxwell, President 30
# C_2013344EN.01005503.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/55

---

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Microsoft v OHIM — Sky IP International (SKYDRIVE)

(Case T-153/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 344/99

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Microsoft Corp. (Redmond, Washington, United States) (represented by: A. Carboni and J. Colbourn, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Panayotis, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Sky IP International Ltd (Isleworth, United Kingdom) (represented by: V. Baxter and D. Rose, Solicitors, and P. Roberts, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 January 2012 (case R 2293/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Sky IP International Ltd and Microsoft Corp.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.

1

---