alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



Certification Of

Chief Executive Officer

Of NATCO Group Inc.

Pursuant To 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, As Adopted

Pursuant To Section 302 Of The

Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



I, John U. Clarke, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of NATCO Group Inc. (the Registrant) for the period ended December 31, 2004;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. [OmittedTo be filed by amendment.]



4. [OmittedTo be filed by amendment.]



5. [OmittedTo be filed by amendment.]



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 16, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ John U. Clarke     
|                     |  |  |  | John U. Clarke         
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Scenario SO2 NOx PM

Pre-control 

days >0.5

Post-control 

days >0.5 ∆days

Pre-control 

days >1.0

Post-control 

days >1.0 ∆days

Precontrol No control No control Existing Fabric Filter 55 --- --- 15 --- ---

Control 8 Dry FGD 95% SOFA + SCR Existing Fabric Filter 55 1 54 15 0 15

Derived from Appendix A of Otter Tail Power Company Big Stone Generating Station Unit 1

Best Available Retrofit Technology Analysis, November 2, 2009

Big Stone I Unit 1 - Days > 0.5 dv and >1.0 dv

Class I Area - Boundary Waters

Control Option 3-year totals 3-year totals

Page 1 of 1
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2011 - 1253 D irectorate Identifier: 2011NM079AD
A320 - 57 - 1118, R04 --- 6/4/08 A320 - 57A1166 --- 1/12/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1836

In re: DEAFUEH MONBO,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:21-cv-00004-CCB)

Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 17, 2021

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deafueh Monbo, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Deafueh Monbo petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the 

recusal of the district court judge presiding over her civil action. We conclude that Monbo 

is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when 

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to 

attain the relief she desires.” Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (internal quotation marks 

omitted). “A district judge’s refusal to disqualify h[er]self can be reviewed in this circuit 

by way of a petition for a writ of mandamus.” In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 

1987). 

Monbo’s conclusory assertions of bias are based solely on the district judge’s 

adverse rulings, which is insufficient to warrant the recusal of the district judge. See Belue 

v. Leventhal, 640 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ 

of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Time Warner Telecom Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Mark A. Peters, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                   
|----- |  | ------------------
|      |  | /s/ Mark A. Peters
|Name: |  | Mark A. Peters    
|      | 
|Date: |  | March 1, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service 

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of intent. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, intends to grant to H2H Innovations, LLC of Wilmington, Delaware, an exclusive license to the Federal Government's patent rights in U.S. Patent No. 7,345,136, “Water-Resistant Vegetable Protein Adhesive Dispersion Compositions”, issued on March 18, 2008. 

# DATES:

                        (                        **Federal Register**                        ) Comments must be received within thirty (30) days of the date of publication of this Notice in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: Janet I. Stockhausen, USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53726-2398. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janet I. Stockhausen of the USDA Forest Service at the address given above; telephone: 608-231-9502; fax: 608-231-9508; or e-mail: jstockhausen@fs.fed.us. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's patent rights in this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as H2H Innovations, LLC of Wilmington, Delaware, has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the Forest Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 

Richard J. Brenner, 

Assistant Administrator.

 [FR Doc. E8-10018 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
TS120961 Attachment 4

- Sanitized
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         210,421
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    211,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               475,045
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 570,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          230,098
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   570,384
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               328,454
<CGS>                                          282,794
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               294,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (248,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (248,641)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1668 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1668

To provide that the Postal Service may not close any post office which 
results in more than 10 miles distance (as measured on roads with year-
               round access) between any 2 post offices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 2011

Mr. Merkley (for himself, Mr. Moran, Mr. Tester, Mr. Begich, Mr. Wyden, 
and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
  and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that the Postal Service may not close any post office which 
results in more than 10 miles distance (as measured on roads with year-
               round access) between any 2 post offices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Rural Post Offices Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CLOSING OF POST OFFICES.

    Section 404(d) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, in 
making any determination under subsection (a)(3) as to the necessity 
for the closing or consolidation of any post office, the Postal Service 
may not close any post office which results in more than 10 miles 
distance (as measured on roads with year-round access) between any 2 
post offices.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 95-9485.

#### Hascall *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
John Buller's resignation letter dated January 11, 2008



 Exhibit 10.1 
 John K. Buller 
 2101 Westlake Avenue N, #302 
 Seattle,
WA 98012 
 206-321-0016 
  

	TO:	Tully’s Coffee Corporation 

 Attention: Chairman and
Board of Directors 
 3100 Airport Way South 
 Seattle, WA 98134 
  

	RE:	30 Day Written Notice 

 After considerable thought, and with the greatest
respect for the company, its employees and investors, I have decided to resign giving 30 day notice which shall be effective February 8, 2008, unless the Board chooses to release me from my duties and obligations earlier. 
 This letter applies to my position as President and CEO of Tully’s Coffee Corporation, as a Board of Director, and all other associated roles with the Company. I am
very proud of what has been accomplished over the past year, and the progress we have made. But I believe the company must continue to evolve to be successful, and my resignation will give the Board of Directors the broadest range of options in
charting this evolution. 
 Tully’s has outstanding products, outstanding and talented employees, and legions of loyal customers. I believe that
through the evolution of the company’s business model, Tully’s will have a bright future. 
  

					
	January 11, 2008	 		 	/s/ John K. Buller
	Date	 		 	John K. Buller

 Copies to: 
 Patrick R. Lamb, Carney Badley Spellman, P.S. 
 Michael Dwyer, Lane Powell PC
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunnyside Acres Mobile Estates
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hui
Peng Cheng, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 15, 2008


                                       By: /s/ Hui Peng Cheng
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Hui Peng Cheng
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1704

FRANCIS AKINRO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF BALTIMORE; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. 

(1:10-cv-01491-BEL)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 27, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. City of 

Baltimore, No. 1:10-cv-01491-BEL (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

The Board of DirectorsDatalink Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (No. 333-93229) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement(No. 333-96901) on Form S-3 of Datalink Corporation of our reports datedFebruary 6, 2004, with respect to the statements of operations,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Datalink Corporation for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, and the related financial statement schedule for theyear ended December 31, 2003, which reports appear in the  December 31, 2005, annual report onForm 10-K of Datalink Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Minneapolis,Minnesota

March 31, 2006

----
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATE OF CEO
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
International Smart Sourcing, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, David Hale, Chairman, President, (principal
executive officer) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934: and                                                                                    
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
      by the Report.
|  

| | /s/David Hale                                                 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | David
      Hale                                              
| | Chairman of the
      Board of Directors, President (principal
| | executive
      officer)                                      
| | January 26,
      2009                                        

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Neutron sciences progress atOak Ridge National Laboratory [electronic resource].**
 
2007:0205060708091012
2008:0102030405060708091112
2009:01
 
SuDoc Number:E 1.178/2:
Item Number:0429-A-92 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000666433
 
January 9, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Fuel,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ending  March 31,  2014 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report")  I,  Roy C.  Smith ,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 15, 2014


/s/Roy C. Smith
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roy C. Smith, (Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer)


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43905 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43906 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43907 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43908 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43909 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43910 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43911 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43912 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43913 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43914 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43915 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43916 1984HeinOnline -- 49 Fed. Reg. 43917 1984
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-141-CR

JEFFREY L. VIAN										APPELLANT

							V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Jeffrey L. Vian entered an open plea of guilty to indecency with a child - contact.  The trial court assessed his punishment at eight years’ confinement. 

	Vian’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief.  Vian has filed a pro se brief in which he enumerates two potential sources of error.3  In addition, the State has filed a letter brief.

	As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the record to determine whether counsel is correct in determining that the appeal is frivolous.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.).  Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).  Because Vian entered an open plea of guilty, our independent review for potential error is limited to potential jurisdictional defects, the voluntariness of Vian’s plea, error that is not independent of and supports the judgment of guilt, and error occurring after entry of the guilty plea.  See Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Young v. State, 8 S.W.3d 656, 666–67 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

	We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, Vian’s pro se brief, and the State’s letter brief.  We agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).  We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Vian’s counsel and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

								 PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, GARDNER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  March 19, 2009