alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**-  Midwest  
-  Ntl. Ctr. for Agricultural Utilization Rsch. 
-  Bio-oils Research Unit 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**Cuphea Development
**Location: Bio-oils Research Unit**
**2006 Annual Report**
**4d.Progress report.**													This report serves to document research conducted under a specific cooperative agreement between ARS and Western Illinois University.  Additional details of research can be found in the report for the parent project 3620-41000-115-00D, entitled "Industrial Products From New Crops."  This is a new agreement and increases in improved lines of laurea and PSR23 are planned for agronomic evaluation.  White flower cuphea lines are planned to examine non-shattering characteristics.						
    Project TeamIsbell, Terry  
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 
Related National Programs Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products(306)  							Last Modified: 03/24/2010 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
# C_2014409EN.01003401.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2014 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — A Colmeia do Minho (FAIRGLOBE)

(Case T-300/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark FAIRGLOBE - Earlier national word marks GLOBO - Relative ground for refusal - No proof of genuine use of the earlier marks - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))

2014/C 409/48

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Wolter and A. Berger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: A Colmeia do Minho Ld
  a (Aldeia de Paio Pires, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

d

a

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 April 2012 (Case R 1981/2010-2) concerning opposition proceedings between A Colmeia do Minho Ld
  a and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.

d

a

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 2 April 2012 (Case R 1981/2010-2), concerning opposition proceedings between A Colmeia do Minho Ld
  a and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, in that it found that genuine use of the earlier marks had been demonstrated to the requisite legal standard; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 2 April 2012 (Case R 1981/2010-2), concerning opposition proceedings between A Colmeia do Minho Ld
  a and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, in that it found that genuine use of the earlier marks had been demonstrated to the requisite legal standard;

d

a

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Lidl Stiftung & Co. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Lidl Stiftung & Co.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.

1

---
No. 55630.

#### Chong Kee Jan & Co. and Ti Hang Lung & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 976547-G and 797655-G (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2

   Certification of CEO and CFO Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Eugene Boyle,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my
knowledge,

          (i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
          December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements
          of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                             Date:      April 27, 2007

                                               By:  /s/ Eugene Boyle
                                                        ------------
                                            Title:      Chief Financial Officer,
                                                        Chief Operations Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John P. Walker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|       |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  |                   
|------ |  | ---------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------
|       |  |                  |  | 
|Dated: |  | November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John P. Walker
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | John P. Walker    
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Chairman

I, Jeffrey Farrow, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|       |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|------ |  | ---------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|       |  |                  |  | 
|Dated: |  | November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey Farrow                                  
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | Jeffrey S. Farrow                                   
|       |  |                  |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President, Finance and Chief Accounting Officer
**-  Pacific West  
-  Western Regional Rsch. Ctr. (Albany, Ca) 
-  Processed Foods Research 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**Development of New Processing Technologies for Improving the Quality and Safety of Specialty Crops and Fish By-Products
**Location: Processed Foods Research**
**2006 Annual Report**
**4d.Progress report.**													This report serves to document research performed under a Specific Cooperative Research Agreement between ARS and a university partner.  Additional details of research can be found in the report for the parent project 5325-41000-060-00D, "New Technologies to Process Value-Added, Healthy Foods from Fruits and Vegetables".  A variety of new hurdle processing methods have been developed through this project.  Infrared dehydration steps have been combined with conventional hot air drying and freeze-drying to produce unique, high quality final fruit and vegetable products at significantly lower energy and production costs.  This research supports NP 306, Component 2, "New Processes, New Uses, and Value-Added Foods".						
    Project TeamPan, Zhongli  - *John* 
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 
Related National Programs Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products(306)  							Last Modified: 03/24/2010 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
Case No. 14,055a.

#### TINDALL v. MURPHY.

[Hempst. 21.] *1*

Superior Court, Territory of Arkansas.

Dec., 1823.

Evidence — Execution—Judgment.

An execution is not admissible as evidence, unless the judgment on which it issued is produced.

NOTE. By a statute of Arkansas in force 20th March, 1839. it is provided that, when an officer shall sell any real estate or lease of lands for more than three years, he shall make the purchaser a deed, to be paid for by the purchaser, reciting the names of the parties to the execution, the date when issued, the date of the judgment, order, or decree, and other particulars recited in the execution, also a description of the time, place, and manner of sale; which recital shall be received in evidence of the facts therein stated. Dig. p. 504, § 60. This was intended to supersede the necessity of producing the records from which the recitals are made, and to furnish evidence of the authority under which the officer acted, as well as the manner in which he had executed that authority. It is, however, only prima facie, and not conclusive, evidence, and may be rebutted by proof. Newton's Heirs v. State Bank, 14 Ark. 10; Hardy v. Heard. 15 Ark. 184.

Appeal from Pulaski circuit court.

[This was an action by Thomas H. Tindall against Benjamin Murphy.]

Before JOHNSON, SCOTT, and SELDEN, JJ.

OPINION OP

THE COURT.

The only

question presented by the record is, whether the execution offered in evidence by the appellant was properly excluded. We are of opinion that it was incompetent evidence. To have authorized its introduction, the judgment upon which it issued should also have been produced. 3 Litt. 14; 1 Salk. 409 ; 2 Johns. 281; 12 Johns. 213; 2 South. [5 N. J. Law] 813; 20 Johns. 338; 5 Serg. & R. 332; 1 A. K. Marsh, 158; 1 B. Mon. 94; 1 Gilman, 136. Affirmed.
No. 47725.

#### Protests 929332-G, etc., of Lou I. Lubin, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 47291, hats in chief value of ramie, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, were held dutiable at only 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CoStar
Group, Inc.


2
Bethesda Metro Center, 10th floor


Bethesda,
MD 20814





February
25, 2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


450 5th
Street, NW


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
      Certification Of
      Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoStar Group,
Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2009, I, Brian J. Radecki, Chief Financial
Officer of CoStar Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1) such
Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoStar Group, Inc., for the year ended December
31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and





2) the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoStar Group, Inc.,
for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of CoStar Group,
Inc.





By:
            /s/
      Brian J. RadeckiBrian
      J. RadeckiChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized
    Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CoStar Group, Inc. and will be retained by
CoStar Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





In
accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
“furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to CoStar Group, Inc.’s annual report and shall not
be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by
specific reference in such a filing.
No. 40529.

#### Protests 806631-G/84850, etc., of A. Hirsch Co. et al. (Chicago and Cleveland).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### CARNEY v. KENNEY.

May 15, 1835.

*Rule to show cause why execution should not be set aside.*

On an appeal from an award of arbitrators under *the*act of the 20th of March 1810, the appellant shall pay the costs unless he succeeds at least partially. In the latter case he is not to pay costs accruing in *consequence of the appeal,*whether new evidence be introduced by him before the jury or not.

THIS was an action on the case *to*March term 1833, No. *431.*There was an award of arbitrators in favour of the plaintiff for 230 dollars 83 cents. The defendant appealed ; and on the trial before the jury examined witnesses who had not been called before the arbitrators. There was a verdict for the plaintiff for *82*dollars *87*cents, upon which judgment was entered.

The plaintiff issued writs of *fieri facias*and *capias ad satisfaciendum*to March term 1835, for the amount of the verdict and costs of suit

*Hopkins,*for the defendant,

obtained a rale on the plaintiff to show *10cause why the writs of execution should not be set aside, áS far as relates to costs.

On the hearing of the rule, Mr *Hopkins*referred to Landis *v.*Shaffer, *4 8erg.*& *Rawle 196;*and Pratt *v.*Naglee, 6 Serg, & *Rawle*209.

*Brewster, contra,*

contended:

1. That by giving new evidence before the jury, the defendant had rendered himself liable for the costs accruing after, as well as for those accruing before the appeal.

2. That the present application was irregular, and that the motion of the defendant should have been to open the judgment, or to enter judgment without costs.

Pkp„ Curiam.

In Landis *v.*Shaffer, 4 *Serg.*& *Rawle*196, the construction of the arbitration law of the 20th of March 1810, relative to costs, was clearly stated and fixed. The governing principle is, that the appellant shall pay costs unless he succeeds at least partially in the appeal. Where he does succeed partially in the appeal, he is not to pay costs accruing in consequence of the appeal. This is true without regard to the fact whether new evidence be introduced before the jury or not. The court, on motion, would have directed the judgment *to be*entered for the plaintiff without costs accruing in consequence of the appeal; and it is their duty now to modify the judgment accordingly. The execution must then be adapted to the judgment. It is therefore *ordered*that the judgment be modified so as to stand for the amount of the verdict, without costs accruing in consequence of the appeal, and that the execution stand according to the judgment thus modified.
#### In the Matter of the SUCCESSION OF Carrie Alexander SMITH

No. 98-C-2705.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Gray, Nona Dumouil;' — Other(s); Applying- for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of East Baton Rouge 19th Judicial District Court Div. “J” Number 65,018; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CA97 2286.

Denied.

MARCUS, J. not on panel.
# C_2012366EN.01003601.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/36

---

Action brought on 14 September 2012 — Celtipharm v OHIM — Alliance Healthcare France (PHARMASTREET)

(Case T-411/12)

2012/C 366/73

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Celtipharm (Vannes, France) (represented by: P. Greffe and C. Fendeleur, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alliance Healthcare France SA (Gennevilliers, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision corrigendum (of the decision of 2 May 2012) of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 June 2012 in Case R 767/2011-2. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision corrigendum (of the decision of 2 May 2012) of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 June 2012 in Case R 767/2011-2.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Alliance Healthcare France SA

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘PHARMASTREET’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35 — application for Community trade mark No 8 658 445

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark ‘PHARMASEE’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 38, 42 and 44

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition is upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal is granted and the decision of the Opposition Division is annulled

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
#### Benno B. Webster *&*Hildegarde Webster, a partnership d/b/a B. B. Webster & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7751.

Entry No. M 578, etc.

(Decided October 27, 1949)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Charles J. Miville,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisemeut listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, at invoiced unit values in Argentine Pesos for “certain industrial products” in each case, plus the percentages as appraised in each case and plus the packing charges as appraised in each case.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoiced unit values in Argentine pesos for “certain industrial products” in each case, plus the percentages as appraised in each case and plus the packing charges as appraised in each case.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2012194EN.01002003.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/20

---

Action brought on 30 March 2012 — Comsa v OHIM — COMSA (COMSA)

(Case T-144/12)

2012/C 194/34

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Comsa, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: M. Aznar Alonso, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Constructora de obras municipales, SA (COMSA) (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Uphold the action and declare that points 2, 3 and 5 of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 10 January 2012 in Joined Cases R 518/2011-2 and R 795/2011-2 are not consistent with Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (now Regulation (EC) No 207/2009); |
| --- | --- |

—

Uphold the action and declare that points 2, 3 and 5 of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 10 January 2012 in Joined Cases R 518/2011-2 and R 795/2011-2 are not consistent with Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (now Regulation (EC) No 207/2009);

| — | order the defendant and, where appropriate the intervener, to pay all the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and, where appropriate the intervener, to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Constructora de obras municipales, SA (COMSA)

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘COMSA’ for goods and services in Classes 19, 35, 36, 37, 39 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 7 091 051

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Company name (business name) ‘COMSA S.A.’ and unregistered mark ‘COMSA’

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeals of the applicant and of the defendant upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---