alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 184 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 184

To prohibit taxpayer bailouts of fiscally irresponsible State and local 
                              governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Ensign introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit taxpayer bailouts of fiscally irresponsible State and local 
                              governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO PAY STATE 
              OBLIGATIONS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be 
used to purchase or guarantee obligations of, issue lines of credit to 
or provide direct or indirect grants-and-aid to, any State government, 
municipal government, local government, or county government which a 
nationally recognized statistical rating organization has determined 
has defaulted on its obligations or is likely to default, absent such 
assistance from the United States Government.

SEC. 2. LIMIT ON USE OF BORROWED FUNDS.

    The Secretary shall not, directly or indirectly, use general fund 
revenues or funds borrowed pursuant to title 31, United States Code, to 
purchase or guarantee any asset or obligation of any State government, 
municipal government, local government, or county government or to 
otherwise assist such governments, in any instance in which a 
nationally recognized statistical rating organization has determined 
that the State government, municipal government, local government, or 
county government has defaulted on its obligations or is likely to 
default, absent such assistance from the United States Government.

SEC. 3. LIMIT ON FEDERAL RESERVE FUNDS.

    The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall not, 
directly or indirectly, lend against, purchase, or guarantee any asset 
or obligation of any State government, municipal government, local 
government, or county government or to otherwise assist such 
governments, in any instance in which a nationally recognized 
statistical rating organization has determined that the State 
government, municipal government, local government, or county 
government has defaulted on its obligations or is likely to default, 
absent such assistance from the United States Government.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-129973) pertaining to the 2005 Stock Option Plan of Global-Tech Advanced Innovations Inc. (the Company and formerly
known as Global-Tech Appliances, Inc.);
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-9182) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan of the Company; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-10932) pertaining to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of the Company;
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated September 26, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual
Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended March 31, 2009.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young 
|Hong Kong         
|September 26, 2009
No. 42120.

#### Protests 659121-G, etc., of Blum Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 49302), *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 49389), and Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6496.

Entry No. 737138.

Invoice dated London, England, January 14, 1946.

Certified January 14, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 4, 1946.

(Decided November 7, 1946)

*John R. Rafter*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for appraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

• On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Order entered February 11, 2020 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01579-CV 

IN RE PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC., Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-05255 

ORDER 

Before Justices Schenck,Reichek, and Evans 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK 

 JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1



                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1


[SEAL]     [BROUSSARD, POCHE, LEWIS & BREAUX LETTERHEAD]




                                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


                      As Independent Auditors, we hereby consent to the
                      incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K of American
                      Bancorp, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996
                      and 1995, of our report dated January 20, 1998, which
                      appears on Pages 28 through 55 of the annual report to
                      shareholders.

                              /s/ BROUSSARD, POCHE, LEWIS & BREAUX



                       Lafayette, Louisiana
                       January 20, 1998
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of USIP.Com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig Burton,President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Craig  Burton         |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Craig Burton              |
| President, USIP.Com, Inc. |
|                      |
|                      |
| Date:  May 11, 2004       |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.6


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT THE UNDERSIGNED CONSTITUTES AND APPOINTS
TERENCE C. SEIKEL HIS TRUE AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND AGENT, WITH FULL
POWER OF SUBSTITUTION AND RESUBSTITUTION, FOR HIM AND IN HIS NAME, PLACE AND
STEAD, IN ANY AND ALL CAPACITIES, TO SIGN: (i) FORM 10-K BEING FILED ON OR ABOUT
THE DATE HEREOF BY ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC, (THE "COMPANY"), (ii) ANY OR
ALL AMENDMENTS (INCLUDING POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENTS) TO THE COMPANY'S
REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND
DECLARED EFFECTIVE ON OR ABOUT JUNE 10, 1998, AND TO FILE THE SAME, WITH ALL
EXHIBITS THERETO, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (INCLUDING ANY
AMENDMENTS THERETO), WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, GRANTING UNTO
SAID ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND AGENT FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY TO DO AND PERFORM EACH
AND EVERY ACT AND THING REQUISITE AND NECESSARY TO BE DONE AS FULLY TO ALL
INTENTS AND PURPOSES AS HE MIGHT OR COULD DO IN PERSON, HEREBY RATIFYING AND
CONFIRMING ALL THAT SAID ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND AGENT OR HIS SUBSTITUTE OR
SUBSTITUTES, MAY LAWFULLY DO OR CAUSE TO BE DONE BY VIRTUE HEREOF.




                                                   /s/ Roger T. Morgan
                                                   --------------------------
                                                   Name:  Roger T. Morgan
                                                   Dated: March 23, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1945 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 319
112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1945

         To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2011

 Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
 Blumenthal, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Harkin, and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

                           February 13, 2012

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 28.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting at the end the following:
``Sec. 678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings
    ``The Supreme Court shall permit television coverage of all open 
sessions of the Court unless the Court decides, by a vote of the 
majority of justices, that allowing such coverage in a particular case 
would constitute a violation of the due process rights of 1 or more of 
the parties before the Court.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The chapter analysis for chapter 45 of 
title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the 
following:

``678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 319

112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1945

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

         To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 13, 2012

                       Reported without amendment
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00007

- CR
Somer Rachelle Nesloney v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. A

- 21

- 5196

- CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 13, 2023
| ***You have Scripting turned off in your browser** |
|----------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the China Energy Savings  Technology,  Inc.  amendment to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Kam Wah Poon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906,  another
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to China Energy  Savings  Technology,
Inc. and will be retained by China Energy Savings Technology, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Kam Wah Poon
-------------------------------------
Kam Wah Poon
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: March 29, 2005
MERRY HEATHER HARTUNG

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 6167

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed August 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Scott Duncan , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pam ela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
-KPARTMFNT OF • 

SERVED: JANUARY 24,2012 TfeNSFORTMlOH..^ 

vOCie OPERA! lUNb 

• ML M 2S A S- U2 

u s DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET No. CP]ONM0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSFAA-2010-0790 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EMPIRE AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10NM0007 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSFAA-2010-0791 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant"), under date of 

January 12, 2012, has filed a Motion to Withdraw Complaint ("Motion") in this 

consolidated matter. An oral hearing was held in August 2011, but post-hearing briefs 

have not been filed nor has an Initial Decision issued. 

I find and conclude that gram of the Motion furthers the interests of justice and 

would promote judicial economy. Il is in the public interest. As such, and in accordance 
with niy power under the Rules of Practice to "regulate the course of the hearing," 14 

C.F.R. i?I3.2n5(a)(6), I gram the Motion. 

WHEREFORE, CompUiinam's Motion to Withdraw Coiiiplainl having been read 

and considered, il is ORDERED as follows: 

1. ' Complainant's Motion to Withdraw Complaint be and is hereby 

GRANTED: and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

'Tir' 

I/CK / 

Attachments - Service List 

"RichartrC'.lGoodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket Nos. CPI0NM0006 

&CPI0NM0()07 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI000' 

ONE COPY 

David J. Bronczek, President 

Federal Express Corporation, /?c'.v/w//J<^/// 

TEL: 

FAX: 

202-457-7790 

202-457-7799 

Delivery Code 7622, Bldg G, 2"'' Floor 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3' Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125 

Cynthia Chandler-Sncll, Respondent's 

Counsel 

Federal Express Corporation 

Regulatory Division 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, ^^ Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125 

TEL: 901-434-8361 

FAX: 901-434-8283 

Glenn P. Wicks, Respondent's Counsel 

Ronceven D. Almond 

The Wicks Group, PLLC 

1215 17'" Street, NW 

Sumner Annes, Fourth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036 

Kyle Lonia/.ow, Complainant's Counsel 

Aitoniey, Office of Regional Counsel 

Feder.'il Aviation Adniinisirnlion 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renlon. WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin. 

Administrative !MW Jud^e 

Office of Hearings, M-20 . 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floo"r, Room El2-320 

Washington. DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX; 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expediied courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviaiion Administration. 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building -Suite 2W1()00. 

Washington. DC 20-'i9l Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1928 

To provide criminal penalties for stalking. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2011 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mrs. HUTCHISON) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide criminal penalties for stalking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stalkers Act of 2011’’. 

5 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PROVISION RELATING TO STALKING, IN6 CLUDING CYBERSTALKING. 

7 Section 2261A of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘§ 2261A. Stalking 

10 ‘‘Whoever— 

11 ‘‘(1) travels in interstate or foreign commerce 

12 or is present within the special maritime and terriVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:04 Dec 01, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1928.IS S1928

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1928 IS

1 torial jurisdiction of the United States, or enters or 

2 leaves Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, 

3 harass, intimidate, or place under surveillance with 

4 intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another 

5 person, and in the course of, or as a result of, such 

6 travel or presence engages in conduct that— 

7 ‘‘(A) places that person in reasonable fear 

8 of the death of, or serious bodily injury to— 

9 ‘‘(i) that person; 

10 ‘‘(ii) an immediate family member (as 

11 defined in section 115) of that person; or 

12 ‘‘(iii) a spouse or intimate partner of 

13 that person; or 

14 ‘‘(B) causes or attempts to cause or would 

15 be reasonably expected to cause substantial 

16 emotional distress to a person described in 

17 clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of subparagraph (A); or 

18 ‘‘(2) with the intent to kill, injure, harass, in19 timidate, or place under surveillance with intent to 

20 kill, injure, harass, or intimidate another person, 

21 uses the mail, any interactive computer service or 

22 electronic communication service or electronic com23 munication system of interstate commerce, or any 

24 other facility of interstate or foreign commerce to 

25 engage in a course of conduct that— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1928 IS

1 ‘‘(A) places that person in reasonable fear 

2 of the death of or serious bodily injury to a per3 son described in clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of para4 graph (1)(A); or 

5 ‘‘(B) causes or attempts to cause or would 

6 be reasonably expected to cause substantial 

7 emotional distress to a person described in 

8 clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of paragraph (1)(A), 

9 shall be punished as provided in section 2261(b) of 

10 this title.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-992]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-07-004]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Mystic River, Mystic, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the 
Amtrak railroad bridge across the Mystic River, mile 2.4, at Mystic, 
Connecticut. Under this temporary deviation, the bridge may remain in 
the closed position from February 2, 2007 through February 4, 2007. 
This deviation is necessary to facilitate scheduled bridge maintenance.

DATES: This deviation is effective from February 2, 2007 through 
February 4, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this document are available for 
inspection or copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch 
Office, One South Street, New York, New York 10004, between 7 a.m. and 
3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
number is (212) 668-7165. The First Coast Guard District Bridge Branch 
Office maintains the public docket for this temporary deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First 
Coast Guard District, at (212) 668-7195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Amtrak railroad bridge, across the 
Mystic River, mile 0.4, at Mystic, Connecticut, has a vertical 
clearance in the closed position of 4 feet at mean high water and 8 
feet at mean low water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations 
are listed at 33 CFR 117.211.
    The owner of the bridge, National Railroad Passenger Corporation 
(Amtrak), requested a temporary deviation to facilitate scheduled 
bridge pinion shaft maintenance. The bridge will not be able to open 
while the bridge maintenance is underway.
    Under this temporary deviation the Amtrak railroad bridge may 
remain in the closed position from February 2, 2007 through February 4, 
2007.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible.
    Should the bridge maintenance authorized by this temporary 
deviation be completed before the end of the effective period published 
in this notice, the Coast Guard will rescind the remainder of this 
temporary deviation, and the bridge shall be returned to its normal 
operating schedule. Notice of the above action shall be provided to the 
public in the Local Notice to Mariners and the Federal Register, where 
practicable.
    This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 
33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District.
 [FR Doc. E7-992 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P