alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of USIP.Com,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Craig  Burton,
President / Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/
------------------------------------------------------
Craig Burton, President / Principal Accounting Officer
USIP.Com Inc..


Date:  November 08, 2005







                                  END OF FILING
EXHIBIT 14(a)(1)(iv)

                                             11200 Rockville Pike
                                             Rockville, Maryland 20852
                                             301-816-2300
                                             Fax: 301-468-3147

                        ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Re:   J.P. Morgan Commercial Mortgage Finance Corporation
      Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
      Series 1998-C6 (the "Trust)

As an authorized officer of CRIIMI MAE Services Limited Partnership, Special
Servicer for the Trust, and pursuant to the requirements of Section 3.02 of that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement (PSA), dated as of March 1, 1998, I
hereby certify that (i) a review of the Special Servicer's performance of its
obligations under the (PSA) for the period of January 1, 1998 through October
30, 1998, has been made under my supervision; and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based upon such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such period
and there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.

CRIIMI MAE SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
Solely as authorized agent

By:   CRIIMI MAE Services, Inc.
      its general partner


      /s/ Maribeth Stahl
      -------------------------------
      By: Maribeth Stahl
          Vice President

Date:  March 30, 1999
No. 74-5995.

#### Stokes *v.*Robuck, Chairman, Kentucky Parole Board, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 40472.

#### Protest 957313-G of Miglioretti Bros. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) the protest was sustained.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1966 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to reform the process for 

enrolling, activating, issuing, and renewing Transportation Worker Identification Credentials so that applicants are not required to visit a designated enrollment center more than once. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2011 

Ms. AYOTTE (for herself, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. VITTER, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to reform 

the process for enrolling, activating, issuing, and renewing Transportation Worker Identification Credentials so 

that applicants are not required to visit a designated 

enrollment center more than once. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

4 It is the sense of Congress that to avoid further im5 posing unnecessary and costly regulatory burdens on 

6 United States workers and businesses, it is urgent that 

7 the TWIC application process be reformed before the end 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1966 IS

1 of 2012, when many of the more than 1,000,000 current 

2 TWIC holders will be required to renew their Transpor3 tation Worker Identification Credentials. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITION. 

5 In this Act, the terms ‘‘Transportation Worker Iden6 tification Credential’’ and ‘‘TWIC’’ mean the transpor7 tation security card issued under section 70105 of title 

8 46, United States Code. 

9 SEC. 3. TRANSPORTATION WORKER IDENTIFICATION CRE10 DENTIAL APPLICATION REFORM. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

12 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Home13 land Security shall reform the process for the enrollment, 

14 activation, issuance, and renewal of Transportation Work15 er Identification Credentials to require not more than 1 

16 in-person visit to a designated enrollment center, except 

17 as provided under subsection (b). 

18 (b) EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES.—The Secretary 

19 may require a TWIC applicant to visit a designated enroll20 ment center more than once under extenuating cir21 cumstances, as determined by the Secretary. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 10.7
 Agreement No. 0«TRSU_Agr»
 SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 THIS
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT Agreement Company «A_HeaderName_First»
«Name_Mi» «A_HeaderName_Last» Grantee ___day of ___, 20___ Grant Date Plan
 WHEREAS Units
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1. Grant of Units. «Rounded_Trsu» «Rounded_TRSU» Share
 2. Transfer Restrictions Transfer
 3. Vesting and Payment of Units
 Vesting Generally Vesting Date Section 4
 Vesting Date
    
    Vested %, 20__
    
    
    25
    %, 20__
    
    
    25
    %, 20__
    
    
    25
    %, 20__
    
    
    25
    %Total
    
    
    100
    %
 Settlement of Units Section 6 Section 4
 70




---



##### 



Dividends, Splits and Voting Rights . Committee Section 3(b)
 4. Forfeiture
 Termination Due to Death or Disability
 Section 4(a) Code
 Termination Other than Death or Disability
 5. Grantees Representations.
 6. Tax Withholding. Withholding Liability
 7. Par Value Paid Consideration for Shares
 71




---



##### 



8. Miscellaneous.
 No Fractional Shares
 No Effect on Employment or Service Section 3
 Dispute Resolution Rules AAA
 Tax Consultation
 Nature of the Grant
          72




---



##### 



Data Privacy Notice and Consent
   Language
 Delivery of Documents and Notices [name@smith.com]
 Description of Electronic Delivery
 Consent to Electronic Delivery Section 8(h) [name@smith.com]
 73




---



##### 



[name@smith.com]
 Amendment, Termination and Waiver
 Governing Law and Severability
 Successors and Assigns
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 By:Name:Title:GRANTEE:
    
    «A_HeaderName_First»«Name_Mi»«A_HeaderName_Last»SignaturePrint Name
 74
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                             AMERICAN BANCORP, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of American Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
J. Lashute, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of December 31, 2002 (the last
                  date of the period covered by the Report).


/s/ RONALD J. LASHUTE
------------------------------
Ronald J. Lashute
Chief Executive Officer


March 17, 2003
--------------------------
Date
No. 54396.

#### Quon Quon Company *v.*United States,

protests 104360-K and 112356-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Mollison, J-

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shells, temporarily strung, the same in all material respects as the articles the subject of Abstract 53093 and *United States*v. *Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 78, C. A. D. 401), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1738 was sustained.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Summit Environmental
      Corporation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, Keith Parker, Chief Executive Officer of
      the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
      November 14, 2005




*/s/
                  Keith Parker*Keith
                    Parker
                  Chairman
                    and Chief Executive
                    Officer





The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

July 22, 1997.
    The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has submitted the following 
public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. 
Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the OTS 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
OTS Clearance Officer, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, D.C. 20552.
    Dates: Written comments should be received on or before August 27, 
1997 to be assured of consideration.
    OMB Number: 1550-0025.
    Form Number: OTS Forms 1584, 1585, 1589.
    Type of Review: Extension of an already approved collection.
    Title: Purchase of Branch Office(s) and/or Transfer of Assets/
Liabilities.
    Description: Information provided to the OTS is evaluated to 
determine whether the proposed assumption of liabilities and/or 
transfer of asset transactions complies with applicable laws, 
regulations and policy and will not have an adverse effect on the 
Savings Association Insurance Fund.
    Respondents: Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks 
Holding Companies.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 127.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 hour on average.
    Frequency of Response: 1 per application.
    Estimated Total Respondents Burden: 140 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Colleen M. Devine, (202) 906-6025, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20552.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.
Catherine C.M. Teti,
Director, Records Management and Information Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-19715 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
#### BORTON to use of STREET v. STREEPER.

December 10, 1836.

*Rule on plaintiff to produce papers.*

Where the deposition of a nominal plaintiff as a witness is about to be taken under a rule, and he has in his possession books and papers, the production of which are necessary to enable the defendant to cross-examine, the court will order the plaintiff to produce them for the inspection of defendant, and will stay proceedings on the rule to take the deposition until the same are produced, unless sufficient cause of non-production be shown by the deposition.

THIS was a *scire facias*on a mechanic’s claim, brought by *42Borton the mechanic to the use of Street, to whom he had assigned the claim filed against Streeper, the owner. On the 8th of December, 1836, the plaintiff’s attorney entered a rule to take the depositions of Borton, the nominal plaintiff, before a magistrate. December 10, 1836, the defendant made affidavit that the plaintiff, Borton, had in his possession certain books and documents which were necessary to enable him to cross-examine, and which were material to his defence. On motion of

*Clarkson,*for defendant,

The Court ordered *“*the plaintiff to produce for inspection of defendant’s counsel, and to enable him to cross-examine said plaintiff, a certain account-book of the said Amasa Borton, plaintiff, containing a day-book and ledger, and an account with Richard Streeper, kept by him during the spring and summer, or fall of 1834, and a receipt-book kept by the said Borton during the same period; also,an agreement made between Swinn&Warrington and the said Borton, about the beginning of June, 1834, by which the said Swinn & Warrington agreed to do the bricklaying of the fifteen houses against which the claim on which the *scire facias*issued was filed, and proceedings on the rule to take depositions to stay until the same are produced, unless the cause of non-production of the same be shown by the said depositions.”
Case No. 10,081a.

#### In re NEEDHAM.

[1 Chi. Leg. News, 171.]

District Court, E. D. Missouri.

1869.

Bankruptcy — Trust Deed —Sale bt Creditor without Permission of Court.

1. A creditor of a. bankrupt holding the security of a deed of trust in the nature of a mortgage with a power of sale, in a third party as trustee, must prove his debt as a creditor holding a security, and obtain the permission of the court to have the security sold. If he directed a sale without this permission, the court, upon application of the assignee, will set aside the sale.

2. If the trustee sell without the authority of the court, does any title pass to the purchaser?

Decided by

TREAT, District Judge.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

# **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

TheBoard of Directors

DatalinkCorporation:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement (No. 333-93229) on Form S-8 and RegistrationStatement (No. 333-96901) on Form S-3 of Datalink Corporation of our reportsdated February 6, 2004, with respect to the balance sheet of DatalinkCorporation as of December 31, 2003 and the related statements of operations,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-yearperiod then ended, and the related financial statement schedule for the yearsended December 31, 2003 and 2002, which reports appear in the  December31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Datalink Corporation.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP            |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Minneapolis,  Minnesota |
| March 31,  2005         |

 

----
# C_2015155EN.01000301.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — Dole Food Company, Inc., Dole Fresh Fruit Europe, formerly Dole Germany OHG v European Commission

(Case C-286/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeals - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European banana market - Coordination in the setting of quotation prices - Obligation to state reasons - Belated statement of reasons - Belated submission of evidence - Rights of defence - Principle of equality of arms - Principles governing the establishment of the facts - Distortion of the facts - Assessment of the evidence - Market structure - Requirement for the Commission to specify those aspects of the exchange of information which constitute a restriction of competition by object - Burden of proof - Calculation of the fine - Whether sales made by subsidiaries not involved in the infringement are to be taken into account - Sales of the same bananas counted twice))

(2015/C 155/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Dole Food Company, Inc., Dole Fresh Fruit Europe, formerly Dole Germany OHG (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, lawyer)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Kellerbauer and P. Van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2) | Orders Dole Food Company, Inc., and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe, formerly Dole Germany OHG, to bear the costs jointly and severally. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Dole Food Company, Inc., and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe, formerly Dole Germany OHG, to bear the costs jointly and severally.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

1

---
No. A-776 (74-1185).

#### Firestone Plastics Co., a Division of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., et al. *v.*United States Department of Labor et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Application for stay, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1864 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1864

  To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until September 30, 
                                 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2011

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until September 30, 
                                 2012.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Program Extension.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2011'' and inserting ``September 30, 2012''.
    (b) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2011'' and inserting ``September 30, 2012''.
    (c) Repeal.--The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 
112-36) is amended by striking section 130.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016007EN.01001502.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2015 — Nu Air Compressors and Tools v Commission

(Case T-76/12) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of certain compressors originating in China - Partial refusal to refund the anti-dumping duties paid - Determination of the export price - Deduction of anti-dumping duties - Adjustment of the temporal effects of an annulment))

(2016/C 007/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nu Air Compressors and Tools SpA (Robassomero, Italy) (represented by: R. MacLean, Solicitor, and A. Bochon, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik, K. Talabér-Ritz and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for the partial annulment of Commission Decisions C(2011) 8824 final and C(2011) 8812 final of 6 December 2011 concerning applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid on imports of certain compressors originating in the People’s Republic of China, and, in the event that the General Court should annul those decisions, for the maintenance in force of those decisions until the Commission has adopted the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the General Court in this case.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decisions C(2011) 8824 final and C(2011) 8812 final of 6 December 2011 concerning applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid on imports of certain compressors originating in the People’s Republic of China in so far as that article does not grant Nu Air Compressors and Tools SpA a refund of the anti-dumping duties unduly paid beyond the amounts referred to therein; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decisions C(2011) 8824 final and C(2011) 8812 final of 6 December 2011 concerning applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid on imports of certain compressors originating in the People’s Republic of China in so far as that article does not grant Nu Air Compressors and Tools SpA a refund of the anti-dumping duties unduly paid beyond the amounts referred to therein;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.

1

---