Filed 11/7/13 P. v. Williams CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. DARRELL WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant. F065719 (Super. Ct. Nos. 11CM3946 & 11CM2989)

OPINION

THE COURT * APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings Coun ty. Robert Shane Burns, Judge. Deborah Prucha, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

- ooOoo -

* Before Kane, Acting P.J., P oochigian, J., and Peña, J.2 Appellant, Darrell Williams, pled guilty in case No. 11CM3946 to petty theft with a prior (Pen. Code, § 666), and in case No. 11CM2989, he ad mitted violating his probation. Following independent re view of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROC EDURAL HISTORY On August 17, 2011 , Williams was detained outside a Wal-Mart in Hanford after he took a bottle of vodka and some candy bars from the store, concealed in his pants. (Case No. 11CM2989.) On October 5, 2011, Williams pled no contest in case No. 11CM2989 to petty theft (Pen. Code, § 484, subd. (a)) and was placed on misdemeanor probation for three

years. On October 25, 2011, a store clerk at Cost Less Foods in Hanford observed Williams, who was in a motorized wheelchai r, place a package of meat under his shirt and exit the store. Williams wa s then approached by store secu rity and escorted back into the store. (Case No. 11CM2946.) On December 7, 2011, the district a ttorney filed a comp laint in case No. 11CM2946 charging Williams w ith petty theft with a prior and a prior prison term enhancement (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). On April 18, 2012, in case No. 11CM3946, Williams pled guilty to the petty theft offense in exchange for the dismissal of th e prior prison term enhancement. Williams also admitted violating his proba tion in case No. 11CM2989. On May 29, 2012, in case No. 11CM3 946, the court sentenced Williams to a three-year local term with one year to be served on mandatory supervision through the probation department and awarded him presen tence custody credit of 24 days, 12 days of presentence actual custody credit and 12 days of presentence co nduct credit. In case No. 11CM2989, the court sentenced Williams to a concurrent sentence of 180 days and3 awarded him presentence cust ody credit of 25 days, 13 days of presentence actual custody credit and 12 da ys of presentence conduct credit. Williams’s appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. ( People v. Wende , supra , 25 Cal.3d 436.) Williams has not responded to this court’s invitation to submit additional briefing. Following an independent review of the record, we find that no reasonably arguable factual or legal issues exist. DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.