Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 23, 2007 / Notices 28953 

government relationship that exists 

between AIAN tribal governments and 

the Census Bureau. 

This relationship is based on the U.S. 

Constitution, federal treaties, policy, 

law, court decisions, and the ongoing 

political relationship among tribes and 

the federal government. The 

relationship results in a federal trust 

responsibility to federally-recognized 

tribal governments. 

The foundation for this policy 

statement is the White House 

Memorandum of September 23, 2004, 

‘‘Government-to-Government Relations 

with Native American Tribal 

Governments’’ and the AIAN policy of 

the DOC of March 30, 1995. This policy 

is for internal management only and 

does not grant or vest any right to any 

party in respect to any federal action, 

not otherwise granted or vested by 

existing law or regulations. 

II. Definitions 

Federally recognized Indian Tribe: 

Any AIAN, Band, Nation, Pueblo, or 

other organized group or community, 

including any Alaska Native village, as 

defined or established pursuant to the 

Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 

(Title 43, United States Code (U.S.C.), 

Chapter 33, Section 1601 et seq.), 

acknowledged by the federal 

government to constitute a tribe with a 

government-to-government relationship 

with the United States and eligible for 

the programs, services, and other 

relationships established by the United 

States for indigenous people because of 

their status as American Indian and 

Alaska Native tribes, Bands, Nations, 

Pueblos, or communities. 

American Indian or Alaska Native 

Tribal Government: The recognized 

government of an Indian tribe and any 

affiliated or component band 

government of such tribe that has been 

determined eligible for specific services 

by Congress or officially recognized by 

the U.S. Department of the Interior in a 

Notice (‘‘Indian Entities Recognized and 

Eligible to Receive Services from the 

United States Bureau of Indian Affairs’’) 

published in the Federal Register on 

November 25, 2005 (70 FR 71194). 

Trust Responsibility: Includes, but is 

not limited to: promotion and protection 

of tribal treaty rights, federallyrecognized reserved rights, and other 

federally recognized interests of the 

beneficiary American Indian and Alaska 

Native governments; determining, 

documenting, notifying, and interacting 

with tribal governments with regard to 

the impact of Census Bureau programs, 

policies and regulations to protect 

American Indian and Alaska Native 

traditional and cultural life ways, treaty, 

and other federally recognized and 

reserved rights. 

III. Policy Principles 

The following policy statements 

provide general guidelines to Census 

Bureau employees for actions dealing 

with AIAN governments. 

1. The Census Bureau recognizes the 

unique government-to-government 

relationship between the United States 

and federally recognized AIAN tribal 

governments, as affirmed by the 

September 23, 2004, White House 

Memorandum for the Heads of 

Executive Departments and Agencies, 

and the American Indian and Alaska 

Native Policy of the DOC. 

2. The Census Bureau recognizes each 

tribal government as a functioning 

governing body that the Census Bureau 

will work with to count and collect data 

as accurately as possible, of all residents 

living in AIAN areas. 

3. The Census Bureau recognizes and 

invites tribal governments’ involvement 

in the Census Bureau planning process 

for censuses and surveys toward 

ensuring the most accurate counts and 

data for the AIAN populations. 

4. The Census Bureau’s procedures for 

outreach, notice, and consultation will 

ensure involvement of AIAN tribal 

governments, to the extent practicable 

and permitted by law, before making 

decisions or implementing policies, 

rules, or programs that affect federally 

recognized tribal governments. 

5. The Census Bureau will continue 

its partnerships with tribal governments 

to enhance awareness of all censuses, 

surveys, and geography programs—

particularly those including residents 

living in AIAN areas. 

6. The Census Bureau recognizes that 

there are distinct cultural practices, 

religious beliefs, traditions, climate 

conditions, as well as a tribe’s authority 

over its land areas that must be 

considered and abided by when 

conducting any censuses or survey in 

AIAN areas. 

7. The Census Bureau recognizes the 

importance of effective and efficient 

coordination with other federal agencies 

in the planning process of any censuses 

or surveys that will include AIAN tribal 

governments. 

8. The Census Bureau acknowledges 

its responsibility to provide accurate 

demographic and economic data on 

AIAN populations and their businesses. 

The Census Bureau will work with 

tribal governments and other partners to 

encourage the participation of every 

resident. 

9. The Census Bureau will consult 

with AIAN tribal governments before 

making decisions or implementing 

programs that may affect tribes to ensure 

that tribal rights and concerns are 

addressed. Consultation will provide, 

but is not limited to, mutually agreed 

upon protocols for timely 

communication, coordination, 

cooperation, and collaboration. 

Therefore, the Director of the Census 

Bureau hereby directs all directorates 

and their components (divisions, 

branches, and offices) to implement this 

policy by incorporating all of the above 

principles in their interactions with 

federally recognized AIAN tribal 

governments. 

[FR Doc. E7–9893 Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–357–818/Argentina) (A–201–835/Mexico) 

Lemon Juice from Argentina and 

Mexico: Postponement of Final 

Antidumping Duty Determinations and 

Extension of Provisional Measures 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 23, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joshua Reitze (Argentina) or Edythe 

Artman (Mexico), AD/CVD Operations, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0666, or 

(202) 482–3931, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Postponement of Final Determinations 

The Department of Commerce 

(Department) is postponing the final 

determinations in the antidumping duty 

investigations of lemon juice from 

Argentina and Mexico. These 

investigations were initiated on October 

11, 2006. See Initiation of Antidumping 

Duty Investigations: Lemon Juice from 

Argentina and Mexico, 71 FR 61710 

(October 19, 2006). On April 26, 2007, 

the Department published its 

preliminary determinations in these 

investigations. See Lemon Juice from 

Argentina: Preliminary Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Affirmative Preliminary Determination 

of Critical Circumstances, 72 FR 20820 

(April 26, 2007), and Notice of 

Preliminary Determinations of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and of Critical 

Circumstances in Part: Lemon Juice 

from Mexico, 72 FR 20830 (April 26, 

2007). These notices stated that the 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
28954 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 23, 2007 / Notices 

Department would issue its final 

determinations no later than 75 days 

after the date on which the Department 

issued its preliminary determinations. 

Section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 

CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii) provide that a final 

determination may be postponed until 

no later than 135 days after the date of 

the publication of the preliminary 

determination if, in the event of an 

affirmative preliminary determination, a 

request for such postponement is made 

by exporters who account for a 

significant proportion of exports of the 

subject merchandise. Additionally, 19 

CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires that requests 

by a respondent for postponement of a 

final determination be accompanied by 

a request for an extension of the 

provisional measures from a four–

month period to not more than six 

months. 

On April 25, 2007, in accordance with 

section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii) and (e)(2), 

Citrusvil, S.A. and S.A. San Miguel 

A.G.I.C.y F. (the two respondents in the 

investigation of lemon juice from 

Argentina) requested that the 

Department: (1) postpone the final 

determination in the Argentina 

investigation, and (2) extend the 

provisional measures period in the 

Argentina investigation from four 

months to a period not longer than six 

months. These two companies account 

for a significant proportion of exports of 

subject merchandise from Argentina. In 

addition, on April 26, 2007, The Coca–

Cola Company and a subsidiary, The 

Coca–Cola Export Corporation, Mexico 

Branch (respondent in the investigation 

of lemon juice from Mexico), also 

requested that the Department: (1) 

postpone the final determination in the 

Mexico investigation, and (2) extend the 

provisional measures period in the 

Mexico investigation from four months 

to a period not longer than six months. 

This company accounts for a significant 

proportion of exports of subject 

merchandise from Mexico. 

Accordingly, pursuant to section 

735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.210(b)(2)(ii), the Department is 

postponing the final determinations 

until no later than 135 days after the 

publication of the preliminary 

determinations in the Federal Register 

for the following reasons: (1) the 

preliminary determinations in these 

investigations were affirmative; (2) the 

requesting producers/exporters account 

for a significant proportion of exports of 

the subject merchandise in these 

investigations and they requested the 

extension of provisional measures; and 

(3) no compelling reasons for denial 

exist. The new statutory deadline for the 

final determinations is September 8, 

2007. Because September 8, 2007, is a 

Saturday, the Department will issue the 

final determinations no later than 

September 10, 2007. Provisional 

measures will be extended in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) 

and section 733(d) of the Act. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to sections 777(i) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.210(g). 

Dated: May 17, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9926 Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Department of Commerce, National 

Institute of Standards and Technology, 

et al. 

Notice of Consolidated Decision on 

Applications for Duty–Free Entry of 

Electron Microscopes 

This is a decision consolidated 

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 

L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–

36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 

Related records can be viewed between 

8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 2104, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue., NW, Washington, 

D.C. 

Docket Number: 07–014. Applicant: 

U.S. Department of Commerce, National 

Institute of Standards and Technology, 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope, Model Quanta 

Series. Manufacturer: FEI Company, The 

Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 

72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. Order date: 

September 16, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–015. Applicant: 

VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 

Seattle, WA 98108. Instrument: Electron 

Microscope, Model JEM -1011. 

Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. 

Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 

20504, April 25, 2007. Order Date: 

September 13, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–018. Applicant: 

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State 

University, Institute for Critical 

Technology and Applied Science, 

Blacksburg, VA 24061. Instrument: 

Electron Microscope, Model Quanta 600 

FEG. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Brno, 

Czech Republic. Intended Use: See 

notice at 72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. 

Order Date: December 13, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–019. Applicant: 

University of Utah, Department of 

Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, John 

A. Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, UT 

84132. Instrument: Electron Microscope, 

Model JEM -1400. Manufacturer: JEOL 

Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 

72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. Order 

Date: November 15, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–020. Applicant: 

University of Rhode Island, Department 

of Chemical Engineering, Kingston, RI 

02881. Instrument: Electron Microscope, 

Model JEM - 2100. Manufacturer: JEOL, 

Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 

72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. Order 

Date: September 21, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–021. Applicant: 

The University of Texas at Austin, 

Purchasing Office, Austin, TX 78722. 

Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model 

JEM -1400. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., 

Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 72 FR 

20504, April 25, 2007. Order Date: 

December 4, 2006. 

Docket Number: 07–022. Applicant: 

Duke University, Durham, NC 27708–

0271. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 

Manufacturer: FEI Company, The 

Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 

72 FR 20504, April 25, 2007. Order 

Date: December 21, 2006. 

Comments: None received. Decision: 

Approved. No instrument of equivalent 

scientific value to the foreign 

instrument, for such purposes as these 

instruments are intended to be used, 

was being manufactured in the United 

States at the time the instruments were 

ordered. Reasons: Each foreign 

instrument is an electron microscope 

and is intended for research or scientific 

educational uses requiring an electron 

microscope. We know of no electron 

microscope, or any other instrument 

suited to these purposes, which was 

being manufactured in the United States 

at the time of order of each instrument. 

Faye Robinson, 

Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff. 

[FR Doc. E7–9927 Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Purdue University, et al., Notice of 

Consolidated Decision on 

Applications, for Duty–Free Entry of 

Scientific Instruments 

This is a decision consolidated 

pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 

Educational, Scientific, and Cultural 

Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES