alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012200EN.01000801.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/8

---

Appeal brought on 18 May 2012 by Abdulbasit Abdulrahim against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2012 in Case T-127/09: Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-239/12 P)

2012/C 200/14

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Abdulbasit Abdulrahim (represented by: H.A.S. Miller, Solicitor, E. Grieves, Barrister)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant seeks the following order if successful on both pleas:

| — | the Order of the General Court dated 28.2.12 is quashed |
| --- | --- |

—

the Order of the General Court dated 28.2.12 is quashed

| — | it is declared that the action for annulment is not devoid of purpose |
| --- | --- |

—

it is declared that the action for annulment is not devoid of purpose

| — | the matter be remitted back to the General Court for it to determine the annulment application |
| --- | --- |

—

the matter be remitted back to the General Court for it to determine the annulment application

| — | the Commission do pay the costs of this appeal and the costs in the General Court below, including those of making representations upon the Court's invitation. |
| --- | --- |

—

the Commission do pay the costs of this appeal and the costs in the General Court below, including those of making representations upon the Court's invitation.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant bases his appeal on the following two pleas in law:

| — | that the General Court erred when it failed to:






  — | hear from the Advocate-General, and/or; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

that the General Court erred when it failed to:

—

hear from the Advocate-General, and/or;

| — | invite representations from the appellant as to whether the application for annulment was devoid of purpose, and/or; |
| --- | --- |

—

invite representations from the appellant as to whether the application for annulment was devoid of purpose, and/or;

| — | open the oral procedure on the question of whether the application for annulment was devoid of purpose. |
| --- | --- |

—

open the oral procedure on the question of whether the application for annulment was devoid of purpose.

| — | the General Court erred in finding that the action for annulment was not capable of conferring material advantage upon the appellant. |
| --- | --- |

—

the General Court erred in finding that the action for annulment was not capable of conferring material advantage upon the appellant.

---
No. 96-1173.

#### Beeman et al. *v.*Cohen.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of Community College League of California et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of, I, Sanding Tao, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
August 14, 2009





/S/
      Sanding TaoSanding
      Tao
                Chief
      Financial Officer
No. 54334.

#### Alex. D. Shaw & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 837013-G, etc. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 54404.

#### L. Bamberger & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 128287-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00577

- CV

Falcon International Bank

v. Mark A. Cantu, Roxanne Pena Cantu, Individually, and Canflor, L.P., a Texas Limited Partnership
On Appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 0300

- 12

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in favor of the appellant. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 16, 2015
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Pacer Development Team Continues During COVID-19

By Brenda MinnemaDLA Land and Maritime, People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
In the midst of mass-telework due to COVID-19, the Supply Pacer Development Team continues to support DLA Land and Maritime as newly hired individuals are hired through the Direct Hire process. 

"We are working individually with the recently converted College Interns to Pacers," Carlton Edwards, Career Program Specialist and Supply Team Lead reported. "I give Kudos to David Pinkerton our Material Planning Instructor, Jose Arvelo-mendez, our Customer Account Specialist Instructor and Tara Lay Hunt our Resolution Specialist Instructor in their efforts to train virtually."  

DLA Land and Maritime floor supervisors, which currently have Pacers, reported to Edwards there are no issues with the Pacers working virtually as a result of this involuntary mandatory telework due to COVID-19, or reported negative mission impacts. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MPACER/Intern L&MPeople & Culture L&M
# C_2014159EN.01001002.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Thüringer Oberlandesgericht — Germany) — Udo Rätzke v S+K Handels GmbH

(Case C-319/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Energy - Energy labelling of televisions - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2010 - Responsibilities of dealers - Television supplied to the dealer without the label before the regulation became applicable - Dealer’s obligation to label that television from the date on which the regulation became applicable and to obtain a label subsequently))

2014/C 159/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Thüringer Oberlandesgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Udo Rätzke

Applicant:

Defendant: S+K Handels GmbH

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Thüringer Oberlandesgericht — Interpretation of Article 4(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2010 of 28 September 2010 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of televisions (OJ 2010 L 314, p. 64) — Scope ratione temporis — Obligation of the dealer to ensure that each television at the point of sale bears the label, provided by the suppliers, indicating the energy efficiency class — Televisions supplied to the dealer without labels before the date on which the regulation began to apply

ratione temporis

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2010 of 28 September 2010 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of televisions must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation for dealers to ensure that each television, at the point of sale, bears the label provided by the suppliers in accordance with Article 3(1) of that regulation applies only to televisions which have been placed on the market, that is to say, dispatched for the first time by the manufacturer with a view to their distribution in the sales chain, from 30 November 2011.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# April 15 is Tax Day

By DLA Public Affairs

April 15 is Tax Day, the deadline for submitting federal income tax returns to the federal government. It may also refer to the day when state income tax returns are due.

For people living outside the United States and Puerto Rico, Tax Day typically falls on June 15 because of the two-month automatic extension granted by IRS Publication 54. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Tax Day
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

264) ll-E-159 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 12:22:03 PM Sheet 264 of 264 
P.2 

09/04/1996 11:45 1-616-775-2524 

09/04/9S 09:29 ©19199410234 

FIBER PRO CADILLAC 

KK» Kir nv,_. 

PAGE 01 

FROM: 

DATE: 

CONTACT: 

CONTACT REPORT FORM 

PES PROJECT NO. //fOf.OOl 

Charles Hester J'^'-.VM,^'; 

June 18,199S 

Jack Griffiths 

COMPANY/AGENCY: FiberPro, Inc. 

(Address/Telephone No.:) (616) 775-0197 

(Fax) (616)775-2524 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Griffiths explained that FiberPro's switch to a lower styrene resm (from 

approximately 40% to approximately 35%) was not prompted by regulatory pressures. They 

have found that the particular resin they are using just works better for them than their previous 

resin. Their products are large flat panels, resin application is comparatively simple, and they 

don't have to worry about resin roll-out problems. They are using resin (from Cook composites) 

with 35.3% styrene and Mr. Griffiths believes that, in their situation, higher styrene resins would 

not be any cheaper. He does not believe that they experienced any noticeable start-up costs when 

they switched to the lower styrene resin. 

Mr. Griffiths does have an extensive history in the boat building business, and does agree 

that in most production facilities there will be a "cost" associated with a mandated changeover to 

a lower styrene resin. He also stated that resins with around 35% styrene had been available for 

several years and have continued to get better as the resin producers gain experience. He stated 

that with some time and effort spent investigating these resins, most facilities can find one that 

will work well for them. 

Fiber Pro inc. 

1637 Marty Paul St. 

P.O. Box 392 

Cadillac, Ml 49601
No. 65782.

#### W. R. Zanes & Co. of La., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/14001-15325 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 24, 2011 

h0516 

Order 

 

May 24, 2011 

142641 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142641 

 COA: 292906 

Jackson CC: 08-004610-FH 

ROBERT QUARLES VARGAS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 55605.

#### Emil Buschhoff & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 125634-K (S), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Land and Maritime recruits at the Ohio Disabilities Career Fair

By Dr. Alessia PayneDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The purpose of the fair was to help employers connect with qualified and talented civilians as well as veterans with disabilities, and to provide the opportunity and strategy for employers to create a more diverse and inclusive workforce.

More than 150 jobseekers were in attendance and more than 70 federal and state government organizations, private-sector companies and local businesses attended the event.

Approximately 55 participants visited the DLA booth. Visitors learned about the Workforce Recruitment Program requirements, reasonable accommodations, accessibility, federal benefits, college internships, the Pathways to Career Excellence program, and entry-level positions to include part-time and full-time employment. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Careers L&MDLA L&MPACER/Intern L&MResource the Enterprise L&M
No. 74-5944.

#### Norwoods *v.*Superior Court in and for the County of Orange et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 8071.

Entry No. 7128.

(Decided December 17, 1951)

*Sharretts, Hillis & Paley (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivek, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the earthenware articles marked “A” and initialed R. L. G. by R. L. Cunneff covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated on schedule “A” hereto attached and made part hereof, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised value less the amount added to meet advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases and that there is no higher foreign value.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that these appeals to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “A” and initialed RUC by Examiner It. L. Cunneff, and that such value was in each instance the appraised value, less the amount added to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Invicta Seeland, Inc. v. United States

No. 7868.

Entry No. 720177, etc.

(Decided August 21, 1950)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto-that the issues herein relating to the merchandise the subject of these appeals are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*23 Cust. Ct. 235, Reap. Dec. 7712, affirming the judgment in *Gothic Watch Co.*v. *United States,*19 Cust. Ct. 309, Reap. Dec. 7438, and that the record in Reap. Dec. 7712,. *supra,*may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement-embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the annexed schedule, which is marked “A” and made a part of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s-original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500),. and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2014261EN.01002003.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gliwicach — Poland) — proceedings brought by: Adarco Invest sp. z o.o. w Petrosani w Rumunii Oddział w Polsce w Tarnowskich Górach

(Case C-629/13) (1)

1

2014/C 261/38

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.

1

---