alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 111–123—DEC. 28, 2009 123 STAT. 3483 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4314: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Dec. 16, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 24, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–123 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To permit continued financing of Government operations. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CONTINUED FINANCING OF GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS. 

Subsection (b) of section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, 

is amended by striking the dollar amount contained therein and 

inserting ‘‘$12,394,000,000,000’’. 

Approved December 28, 2009. 

Dec. 28, 2009 

[H.R. 4314] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1 with PUBLIC LAWS
Before the First Division,

February 9, 1940

No. 43213.

#### Protests 879581-G, etc., of S. H. Kress & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of Siren horns similar to those the subject of Abstract 39948. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was therefore sustained.
#### Melanie PIGOTT, et al. v. E. Blaine PITTMAN, M.D.

No. 98-C-2759.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Pigott, Melanie; Capp, Pamela B.; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Cer-tiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Number 31069-*642CA; Parish of Caddo 1st Judicial District Court Div. “A” Number 400,108.

Denied.

LEMMON, J. not on panel.
No. 42106.

#### Protests 880161-G, etc., of Oceano Shipping Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
No. 96-398.

#### Lucre, Inc. *v.*Gibson County.

Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Data Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Art
Malone, Jr., Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






August 13, 2004                  /s/ Art Malone, Jr.
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Art Malone, Jr.
                                 Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
Before the First Division,

February 19, 1940

No. 43240.

#### Protests 942393-G, etc., of Carl Zeiss, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Zeiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 182, C. A. D. 15) the Starmorbi telescope was held dutiable at 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 228, Tariff Act of 1930, as telescopes. Filters for Nordenson camera were held dutiable as parts of cameras at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 on the authority of *United States*v. *Zeiss*(27 C. C. P. A. 12, C. A. D. 54).
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the
date hereof(the “Report”), I, Jing’an Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1. The Reportfullycomplies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.






Date:January20, 2009




By:/s/
      Jing’an
      WangJing’an Wang
                Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jose Araque, President, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Jose Araque
------------------------------------------
Jose Araque
President, Principal Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer,
Chairman of the Board of Directors

November 8, 2006
#### Astor Sales Corp. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6594.

Entry No. 712573, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, November 1942, etc.

Certified November 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 23, 1942, etc.

(Decided December 10, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 65773.

#### Israel Religious Art, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/26536 (New York).

*531Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of tbe record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was, therefore, overruled.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Data, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Sanding Tao, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2005


/S/ Sanding Tao
---------------
Sanding Tao
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012080EN.01002402.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/24

---

Action brought on 25 January 2012 — Herbacin cosmetic v OHIM — Laboratoire Garnier (HERBA SHINE)

(Case T-34/12)

2012/C 80/41

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Herbacin cosmetic GmbH (Wutha-Farnroda, Germany) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Laboratoire Garnier et Cie (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 November 2011 in Case R 2255/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 November 2011 in Case R 2255/2010-1;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Laboratoire Garnier et Cie

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘HERBA SHINE’ for goods in Class 3

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national and Community word mark and international registration ‘HERBACIN’ for goods in Class 3

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of the first sentence of Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 in that, at the time of the first-instance opposition decision, an effective request for proof of use on the part of the applicant no longer existed; infringement of point (b) of the second sentence of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 in that the Board of Appeal of OHIM erred in law in disregarding considerable export turnover under the opposing mark ‘HERBACIN’; and infringement of the first sentence of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 in that the proof of use submitted as regards customers within the Community was incorrectly assessed.

Pleas in law:

---
#### The State of Kansas v. W. R. Burke.

No. 16,254.

Appeal from Atchison district court; Benjamin Ft Hudson, judge.

Opinion filed April 10, 1909.

Affirmed.

*Fred S. Jackson,*attorney-general, and *Charles D.. Shukers,*‘special assistant attorney-general, for The* State.

*J. P. Adams,*and *C. J. Conlon,*for the appellant.

*Per Curiam:*

The defendant was convicted of the violation of an injunction restraining him from maintaining a nuisan.ce in a certain place in the city of Atchison. He appeals from the judgment. No question is presented which has not heretofore been determined by the decisions of this court. The evidence regarding the records of the collector of internal revenue was properly-admitted. *(The State v. Schaeffer,*74 Kan. 390; *The State v. Fishback,*79 Kan. 679.) There was substantial evidence to sustain the finding, and that determines the inquiry here.

The judgment is affirmed.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 20-12791

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EQUANZICK HOWELL, 

a.k.a. Pookie, 

a.k.a. Big Pook, 

a.k.a. Pook Pook, 

Defendant-Appellant.

USCA11 Case: 20-12791 Date Filed: 12/15/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 20-12791

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00146-JDW-AEP-1

____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant 

to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. 

See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 

1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made 

knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 

F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (appeal waiver includes waiver of 

the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues); see also 

United States v. Anderson, 772 F.3d 662, 668–69 (11th Cir. 2014) 

(prior appellate decision binds subsequent proceedings in the same 

case).

USCA11 Case: 20-12791 Date Filed: 12/15/2021 Page: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10.3


 


FORM OF AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made this 28th day of January, 2008 by and among MediaReady, Inc., a Florida Corporation, (“MediaReady”), and Shandong Jiajia International Freight & Forwarding Co., Ltd., a company of limited liabilities organized under the laws of the Peoples Republic of China (the “Company” or “Jiajia”), and the individuals Hui Liu and Wei Chen, shareholders of Jiajia (the “Shareholders”) and amends that certain Acquisition Agreement between the parties executed on December 31, 2007.


 


WHEREAS, the full name of the Company shall be amended to Shandong Jiajia International Freight & Forwarding Co., Ltd. 


 


WHEREAS, Section 1. Consideration shall be amended to read: MediaReady shall acquire a 51% equity interest of Jiajia for total consideration of $2,000,000 (“Cash Consideration”) and 1,000,000 shares of MediaReady Series A Preferred Stock, 120,000 shares of MediaReady Series B Preferred Stock, and a 3 year option to purchase 80,000,000 shares of MediaReady common stock at a purchase price of $.0075 per share (“Stock Consideration”). 


 


All other provisions of the Acquisition Agreement entered into amongst the parties hereto on December 31, 2007 shall remain in effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment Agreement on the date first above written.


 





	
            MediaReady, Inc.

 

______________________________

Signature

 

______________________________

V. Jeffrey Harrell, President & CEO
 	
            David Aubel

 

______________________________

Signature

 

David Aubel  
                      
                      

MediaReady Shareholder
 
	
             

 
 	
             
 
	
            Shandong Jiajia International Freight & Forwarding Co., Ltd.

 

______________________________

Signature

 

______________________________

Hui Liu, Chairman
 	
             
 
	
             

Shareholder: Wei Chen

 

______________________________

Signature
 	
             

Shareholder: Hui Liu

 

______________________________

Signature
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

**NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT**

 

ThisNote Extension Agreement (the “Agreement”) is dated as of August 30, 2008and is made by and between BRAD FOOTE GEAR WORKS, INC., f/k/a BFG AcquisitionCorp., an Illinois corporation (“Borrower”) and LASALLE BANK NATIONAL BANKf/k/a LaSalle National Bank f/k/a LaSalle Bank NI, a national bankingassociation (the “Bank”).

 

**R E C I T A L S**

 

A.            Borrower haspreviously delivered to the Bank its Amended and Restated Renewal RevolvingNote dated January 15, 2008 in the principal amount of $10,000,000.00, asmodified and extended by Note Extension Agreement dated as of June 30,2008 (the “Note”), evidencing a revolving line of credit loan extended by theBank to the Borrower; and

 

B.            The Note matures on August 30,2008, and Borrower has asked the Bank to extend the maturity date of the Noteuntil October 31, 2008; and

 

C.            The Bank hasconsented to such loan request, on the terms hereinafter provided.

 

**NOW, THEREFORE,**in consideration of the foregoing, and forvaluable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are herebyacknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.             In the first lineof the first paragraph on page 1 of the Note, the date “August 30,2008” is hereby deleted, and the date “October 31, 2008” is substitutedtherefor. Borrower confirms to the Bank that the Note shall mature on October 31,2008.

 

2.             Borroweracknowledges and irrevocably agrees that the payment and performance of theNote, as extended hereby, shall continue to be secured by Collateral Documents(as such term is defined in the Loan and Security Agreement dated January 17,1997 between the Borrower and the Bank, as amended from time to time).

 

3.             Except as expresslymodified by this Agreement, all terms and provisions of the Note shall standand remain in full force and effect.

 

**SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS**

 

1

----

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the day and yearfirst above written.

 
| **BORROWER:**                      |
|------------------------------------|
|                               |
| BRAD  FOOTE GEAR WORKS, INC.       |
|                               |
|                               |
| By:                           | /s/ J.  Cameron Drecoll |   |
|                               | J. Cameron Drecoll |
| Title:                             | Chief Executive Officer |
|                               |
|                               |
| **BANK:**                          |
|                               |
| LASALLE  BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION |
|                               |
|                               |
| By:                           | /s/ Katherine M. Novey |   |
| Title:                        | Vice President |   |
|                                    |  |  |  |  |

 

2

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         103
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1868
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1765)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.3


SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


In connection with the Annual Report of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the “ Company ”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”), I, Raymond L. Gellein, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 28, 2013


/s/ Raymond L. Gellein, Jr.Raymond L. Gellein, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
|  |  |  | Information For          StudentsParentsTeachersAdministratorsInformation AboutGrants & ContractsFinancial AidResearch & StatisticsPolicyPrograms |  |  |
|--|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|

 

 

The White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans home page has moved to a new address.  You will be forwarded to the new address at http://www.yesican.gov/ in 10 seconds.  Please remember to update your bookmarks.
# C_2014175EN.01001901.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/19

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 January 2014 — Simone Gbagbo v Council of the European Union, European Commission, Republic of Côte d'Ivoire

(Case C-397/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Time-limit - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 175/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Simone Gbagbo (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Chavrier, Agents, European Commission, Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (represented by: J.-P. Mignard, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 April 2013, in Case T-119/11 Gbagbo v Council in which the General Court dismissed the action seeking an annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36) and, secondly, of Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), in so far as they relate to the appellant — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment

Gbagbo

Council

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Simone Gbagbo is ordered to bear, in addition to her own costs, those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Simone Gbagbo is ordered to bear, in addition to her own costs, those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

| 3. | The Republic of Côte d'Ivoire shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Republic of Côte d'Ivoire shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.09.2013.

1

---