alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014093EN.01001802.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 February 2014 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-139/13) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Area of freedom, security and justice - Standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States - Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 - Biometric passport - Inclusion of digital fingerprints - Failure to implement - Failure to issue within the prescribed periods)

2014/C 93/29

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Maidani and G. Wils, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: J.-C. Halleux and L. Van den Broeck, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States (OJ 2004 L 385, p. 1) — Biometric passports containing digital fingerprints — Failure to issue such passports within the prescribed periods laid down by that regulation.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by having failed to implement, in the prescribed period, the technical specifications relating to issuing biometric passports containing digital fingerprints, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by having failed to implement, in the prescribed period, the technical specifications relating to issuing biometric passports containing digital fingerprints, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 01.6.2013.

1

---
March 16, 2012

Mr. Robert Almon

Total Flight Solutions

450 Airport Road, Suite 200

Louisburg, NC 27549

Dear Mr. Almon:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 5, 2012, exemption request on behalf of Total Flight Solutions

into the public docket (No. FAA-2012-0256), but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send 

your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3

Project No.: AAM-12-266-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-105:TTHOMAS:03/08/12Doc# 33851

ARM-1/100/105:AAM-800

MR ROBERT ALMON

TOTAL FLIGHT SOLUTIONS

450 AIRPORT ROAD SUITE 200

LOUISBURG NC 27549
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Alamosa Holdings, Inc. (the"Company") for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David E. Sharbutt, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ David E. Sharbutt

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Name:    David E.Sharbutt Title:      Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer Date:      May 10, 2005

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

42

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 91 (Friday, May 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 26395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10134]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Date And Time: Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

Place: Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of 
the EEOC Office Building, 1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

Status: The meeting will be open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: Open Session:
    1. Announcement of Notation Votes,
    2. Change to EEOC Order 110.002, Reorganization of Administrative 
Judge Function and Creation of the Office of Federal Sector Programs, 
and
    3. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking--Federal Sector Regulations, 29 
CFR part 1614.

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission 
meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also provides a 
recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission 
sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing 
impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by 
using the voice and TTY numbers listed above. Contact Person for More 
Information: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: May 2, 2008.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
This Notice Issued May 2, 2008.
 [FR Doc. E8-10134 Filed 5-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED

STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global-Tech Appliance Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John C.K. Sham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ John C.K. ShamJohn C.K. ShamPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: September 28, 2007
# C_2014253EN.01002601.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 June 2014 — Hut.com v OHIM — Intersport France (THE HUT)

(Case T-330/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark THE HUT - Earlier national word mark LA HUTTE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 253/36

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Hut.com Ltd (Northwich, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Intersport France (Longjumeau, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 April 2012 (Case R 814/2011-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Intersport France and The Hut.com Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders The Hut.com Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders The Hut.com Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.

1

---
No. 96-312.

#### United States ex rel. Devlin et al. *v.*California et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Craig A. Knock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 26, 2010 |  | /s/ Craig A. Knock                                   
|                     |  | Craig A. Knock                                       
|                     |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                     |  | Principal Accounting Officer                         
|                     |  | Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     Notice published April 23, 2008 (73 FR 21953), the reference to Amobeige Shipping Corp. is corrected to read: “Amobelge Shipping Corp.”                 

Dated: May 2, 2008. 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Assistant Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-10122 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Jose Araque, President, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Jose Araque


Jose
      Araque


President,
      Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,


Chairman
      of the Board of Directors




November
      14, 2007
# C_2013114EN.01002303.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 January 2013 — Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH v Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg

(Case C-15/13)

2013/C 114/36

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg

Defendant:

Intervener: Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH

Intervener:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must a ‘public contract’ within the meaning of Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts be interpreted as also meaning a contract in the case of which, although the contracting authority does not exercise over the contractor a control similar to that which it exercises over its own departments, both the contracting authority and the contractor are controlled by the same body, which is itself a public contracting authority within the meaning of Directive 2004/18 and the contracting authority and the contractor carry out the essential part of their activities with that common body (horizontal in-house transaction)?
  If the first question is answered in the affirmative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must a ‘public contract’ within the meaning of Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts be interpreted as also meaning a contract in the case of which, although the contracting authority does not exercise over the contractor a control similar to that which it exercises over its own departments, both the contracting authority and the contractor are controlled by the same body, which is itself a public contracting authority within the meaning of Directive 2004/18 and the contracting authority and the contractor carry out the essential part of their activities with that common body (horizontal in-house transaction)?

1

If the first question is answered in the affirmative:

| 2. | Must the control similar to that which the contracting authority exercises over its own departments extend to all aspects of the contractor’s activity or is it sufficient for it to be confined to the area of procurement? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must the control similar to that which the contracting authority exercises over its own departments extend to all aspects of the contractor’s activity or is it sufficient for it to be confined to the area of procurement?

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 134, p.114

1

---
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global-Tech Appliance Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kin Shek Leung, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    Kin Shek LeungKin Shek Leung Acting Chief Financial Officer Date: September 29, 2006
June 4, 1959

Reap. Dec. 9458.

#### B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

REHEARING MOTION DENIED

Motion by plaintiff.
No. 96-313.

#### Pruitt *v.*National Casualty Insurance Co.

App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

      The following table sets forth all subsidiaries of Smith International,
Inc., other than inactive and insignificant subsidiaries that, considered in the
aggregate, would not constitute a significant subsidiary, indicating the
percentage of issued and outstanding voting securities beneficially owned by it:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  % of
                                                                                  Direct
                                                                                    and
                                                                                  Indirect
            Name of Subsidiary                      Where Incorporated           Ownership
--------------------------------------------    ----------------------------    -----------
<S>                                             <C>                             <C>
S.I. Nederland B.V.                             Netherlands                         100%

Smith (Bermuda) Ltd.                            Bermuda                             100%

Smith International Acquisition Corp.           Delaware                            100%

Smith International Australia (Pty) Ltd.        Australia                           100%

Smith International Canada Ltd.                 Canada                              100%

Smith International do Brasil Ltda.             Brazil                              100%

Smith International Deutschland GmbH            Germany                             100%

Smith International Development Corporation     Panama                              100%

Smith International Inc., S.A.                  Argentina                           100%

Smith International Italia, S.p.A.              Italy                               100%

Smith International (North Sea) Ltd.            Scotland                            100%

Smith Internacional de Venezuela, C.A.          Venezuela                           100%

Wilhold, Inc.                                   Delaware                            100%
</TABLE>

All of the above subsidiaries are included in the Company's consolidated
financial statements.
No. 55608.

#### United States Leather Co. *v.*United States,

protest 98372-K (Philadelphia) .

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.