TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00215-CV

In Re Permian Highway Pipeline LLC and Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Relators Permian Highway Pipelines LLC and Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline 

LLC have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1, 52.10(a). The Court has received responses from the respondent trial 

court and real party in interest Electro Purification, LLC. The Court had specifically requested

that respondent address relators’ assertion that the trial court has refused to schedule a hearing by 

teleconference or videoconference on the temporary injunction, in contravention of the Texas

Supreme Court’s guidance that temporary restraining orders and temporary injunctions remain 

essential functions even during the current COVID-19 crisis, and instead has postponed the 

hearing indefinitely. See https://www.txcourts.gov/media/coronavirus-covid-19-court-operationguidance/ at Guidance Issued 3/5/2020, 3/12/2020, & 3/26/2020 (explaining that essential 

proceedings “that must occur in the first 7 days” include “temporary restraining orders/temporary 

injunctions” but recommending that in-person proceedings be delayed until at least May 8 and 
2

that essential proceedings occur in person only if holding proceeding remotely is not possible or 

feasible).

In its response, the trial court has given assurances that it is working toward 

acquiring the technological capability to conduct an evidentiary hearing remotely, while 

adequately ensuring the parties’ rights to a hearing that complies with the court’s rules. We 

recognize that these are unprecedented circumstances and that the trial court may need additional 

time to put an appropriate system in place to successfully hold a remote evidentiary hearing 

involving multiple law firms and attorneys, numerous litigants, and the submission of evidence. 

See https://www.txcourts.gov/media/coronavirus-covid-19-court-operation-guidance/ at 

Guidance Issued 4/2/2020, Recommendations & Tips on Holding Zoom Virtual Hearings 

(providing information available from the Office of Court Administration on Zoom licenses and 

other resources for help with conducting remote proceedings). We are also sympathetic to the 

trial court’s concern that it not endanger essential staff who fall into the category of people who 

are most at risk from an in-person hearing. Our concern is that “mandamus is available to 

remedy a temporary restraining order that violates Rule 680’s time limitations” and that the 

extension order at issue here violates Rule 680 by extending the temporary restraining order

indefinitely. In re Texas Nat. Res. Conservation Comm’n, 85 S.W.3d 201, 207 (Tex. 2002)

(holding trial court abused its discretion by granting extension of temporary restraining order for 

more than sole fourteen-day extension allowed by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 680).

However, given the extenuating circumstances presented by the COVID-19 crisis 

and the trial court’s assurance that it is not refusing to have the hearing but instead intends to 

have the hearing remotely as soon as it is technologically feasible, we cannot conclude that the 

trial court has abused its discretion at this point. We note that the trial court signed the initial 
3

temporary restraining order on March 12, and only 22 days have passed since that date. Because 

the trial court’s extension order does not provide a mechanism by which the parties may prompt 

a hearing when the trial court has acquired the necessary technological capabilities, the Court 

orders relators and real party in interest to confer with the trial court next week on the status of 

its technological capabilities and to file a joint status report providing the Court with an update

(including an expected hearing date if one has been set) on or before April 10, 2020.

Relators’ emergency motion and petition for writ of mandamus remain pending 

before the Court.

It is ordered on April 3, 2020.

Before Justices Goodwin, Kelly, and Smith