alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SERVED FEBRUARY 24,2010

"TnT 

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Liell 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### GREAT LAKES AVIATION. INC. FAA DOCKETNO. 

### CP09NJ\t10008 (Civil Penalty Action) DMS No. FAA-2009-0103 . I


### AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER Paragraph #2 ofthe Procedural Order is amended as follows: WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule:

... On orbefore March 19, 201 0, thepartiesshallconclude alldiscovery including, butnot limitedto, depositions, documentproduction, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. lftheparties cannot resolve a discovery dispute theyshallsubmit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner...**~f--ttj'tcIlard** 

### C. Goodwin 'U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListFAA Docket No. CP09NM0008 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COpy Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000 1 ONE COpy Timothy 

### R. Thornton, Respondent's Counsel Briggs and Morgan, P.A. 2200 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-2157 TEL: 612-977-8400 FAX: 612-977-8650 

### R. Scott Morris, Complainant's Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 FederalAviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, SW. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2007 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-32G Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 2()2-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

(PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James A. H. Garner, Executive Vice-President Finance & Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of MDS Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: March 17, 2005 | /s/ James A. H. Garner(James A. H. Garner)Executive Vice-President Finance & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
May 20, 1952

No. 56710.

protest 154879-K.

#### Perry Ryer & Co. *v.*United States,

C. D. 1403. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
Before the First Division,

June 11, 1952

No. 56757.

protest 625854-G (Seattle).

#### Samuel S. Perry *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 74-5807.

#### Gant *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Gallagher & Ascher Company (Jack Gomperts & Company, Inc.) *v.*United States

No. 7666.

Invoice dated Vernon, Canada, December 10, 1947.

Certified December 12, 1947.

Entered at Kansas City, Mo., December 26, 1947.

Entry No. 184-A.

(Decided February 15, 1949)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (Frank L. Lawrence*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Charles J. Miville,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows between counsel for plaintiff (s) and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, concerning the merchandise referred to herein:

> 1) That the involved issues in this appeal are the same in all material respects as in Tower v. US, RD 7624, on Canadian sales tax, and that the record in that case may be incorporated herein.

> 2) That the appraised value of said merchandise, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal *408to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> 3) That this case may be deemed to be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership

/s/ David J.Vogel                                                        DavidJ. Vogel Citigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

March 28,2006                                                             Date

----
No. 96-8013.

#### Bemis *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Army major promoted to lieutenant colonel by his former commander

By DLA Aviation Public Affairs

                Richmond, Va  –              
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry officiated the promotion ceremony of Army Maj. Alex Shimabukuro at Fort Lee, Virginia, Dec. 3, 2018.  Prior to his current assignment as deputy director, Training Development Directorate, Combined Army Support Command and Sustainment Center Excellence, Shimabukuro worked as the operations officer, Army Customer Facing Division, DLA Aviation from July 2015 – August 2018.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Defense Logistics Agency Aviationpromotion ceremonyPeople and Culture
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |         | /s/                Caixia Peng                                                                                      |
|--------|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |    | Caixia                PengChief                Financial OfficerDate:                 May 21, 2007   |

----
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1869 

To terminate the Economic Development Administration, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2011 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To terminate the Economic Development Administration, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘EDA Elimination Act 

5 of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD7 MINISTRATION. 

8 (a) TERMINATION.—The Economic Development Ad9 ministration is terminated. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1869 IS

1 (b) REPEAL.—The Public Works and Economic De2 velopment Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3121 et seq.) is re3 pealed. 

4 (c) CONCLUSION OF BUSINESS.—The Secretary of 

5 Commerce shall take such actions as are necessary to con6 clude the outstanding affairs of the Economic Develop7 ment Administration, including dispositions of personnel, 

8 assets, and obligations. 

9 (d) NO EFFECT ON THE EXPENDITURE OF

10 FUNDS.—Nothing in this section prevents the expenditure 

11 of any funds received before the effective date of this Act. 

12 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

13 This Act shall take effect on the first day of the first 

14 fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this 

15 Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2013032EN.01002301.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/23

---

Action brought on 30 November 2012 — Rani Refreshments/OHMI — Global-Invest Bartosz Turek (Sani)

(Case T-523/12)

2013/C 32/36

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rani Refreshments FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: M. Chapple, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Global-Invest Bartosz Turek (Poczesna, Poland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 September 2012 in case R 236/2012-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 September 2012 in case R 236/2012-4; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay to the applicant the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with its application and the decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay to the applicant the costs incurred by the applicant in connection with its application and the decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Sani’ in green, willow green and white, for among others, goods in classes 29, 30 and 32 — Community trade mark application No 9087479

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 2587244 of the figurative mark in green, white, black and blue ‘Rani’, for goods in class 32; Community trade mark registration No 4005211 of the figurative mark in blue and white ‘Rani’, for goods in classes 29 and 30; Community trade mark registration No 2587293 of the figurative mark in blue and white ‘RANI FLOAT’, for goods in class 32; Community trade mark registration No 2587269 of the figurative mark in orange, yellow, black, white, red, pink, blue and green ‘Rani’, for goods in classes 16, 21 and 32; United Kingdom trade mark registration No 1239206 of the figurative mark ‘rani’, for goods in class 32

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 49518.

#### Protest 94231-K of S. Lisk & Bro. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

The amended report of the assistant appraiser was received in evidence and in view thereof it was conceded by Government counsel that the merchandise in question is properly dutiable as manufactures in chief value of glass, not specially provided for, under paragraph 230 (d). The protest was therefore sustained to this extent.
p.1 

OAR Box 1834 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

34) IV-E-07 

Docket Number: 

A-90-07 

Printed 11/10/2008 2:14:35 PM Sheet 34 of 61 
P.2 

f*r% |- _W% \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ISgjfr£-« ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 %«*y 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

JAN 2 7 1994 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Phone Conversations with Representatives of 

The American Petroleum Institute (API) and The 

Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA) 

Judith Gray, Senior Project Manager 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch 

Glenn W. Passavant, Chief 

Special Regulatory Projects Bran 

EPA Air Docket A-90-07 

~*r 

\ViM*<ro^4 

ne 24, 1993, I made separate phone calls to Carol Stack 

IMA and to John Sepesi of the API, to discuss whether their 

i z. at ions would consider taking a leadership role in brokering 

ioipation of small companies in the proposed grouping and 

cost sharing provisions of the Fuels and Fuel Additives 

regi tion program. 

ol Stack said that if a few small companies (at their own 

initiative) asked to join CMA's grouping activities, CMA would 

probably try to accommodate them. However, she said that CMA does 

not at this time intend to act as broker for the industry as a 

whole and that the participation of a large number of small 

companies would be an administrative headache. 

roilarly, John Sepesi said that API had no intent at this 

tin" i> solicit the participation of small companies in API's 

grouping activities. He said, in fact, that it would probably be 

less expensive and easier for API to allow small companies to make 

use of its data for free than to attempt to administer a cost 

sharing arrangement that involved perhaps hundreds of small 

companies.
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **FIRSTBINGO.COM INC.**(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Michael Kabin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

Dated this 8th day of August, 2006.

 
MICHAEL KABIN 
Michael Kabin 
Chief Executive Officer
No. 42063.

#### Protests 927943-G, etc., of Cohn & Rosenberger Inc. (New York).

*377Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of imitation pearl bead caps similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(C. D. 161). The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSOUTH SHORE RESOURCES INC.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Michael Kabin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated this 14thday of May, 2008.

MICHAEL KABINMichael KabinChief Executive Officer






























---
#### American Shipping Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6547.

Entry No. 730377, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, November 3, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 19, 1941, etc.

(Decided November 25, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges (Eugene F. Blauvclt*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, were filed by the plaintiffs for the purpose of having decided the question of whether or not a so-called British purchase tax should be included as a part of the dutiable values of the merchandise.

In submitting the appeals for decision counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issues herein and the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, are similar in all material respects, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the agreed facts, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any additions made by the importers to meet advances by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.