alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 40512.

#### Protest 958230-G of Bert Friedberg & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Borgfeldt*v. *United States*(T. D. 48585) the forks in question were held dutiable as manufactures of wood at 33)4 percent under paragraph 412.
#### International Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6892.

Entry No. 725818.

Invoice dated Sheffield, England, September 22, 1941.

Certified September 24, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 22, 1941.

(Decided February 18, 1947)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
----

----

| (1)   | Registration Statement Number  333-82599 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Realty Information Group, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | Registration Statement Number  333-92165 on Form pertaining to the CoStar Group, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3)   | Registration Statement Number  333-45770 on Form S-8 pertaining to the CoStar Group, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4)   | Registration Statement Number  333-69548 on Form S-8 pertaining to the CoStar Group, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended) |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (5)   | Registration Statement Number  333-135709 on Form S-8 pertaining to the CoStar Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (6)   | Registration Statement Number  333-143968 on Form S-8 pertaining to the CoStar Group, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (7)   | Registration Statement Number  333-167424 on Form S-8 pertaining to the CoStar Group, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EX-32.1




Section
      906 Certification





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutra Pharma Corp. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rik J. Deitsch,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                August 17, 2007/s/
                Rik J. DeitschRik
                J. DeitschChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2013026EN.01005702.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/57

---

Action brought on 16 November 2012 — European Drinks v OHIM — Alexandrion Grup Romania (DRACULA BITE)

(Case T-496/12)

2013/C 26/116

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Drinks SA (Ștei, Romania) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SC Alexandrion Grup Romania Srl (Pleasa, Romania)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 September 2012 in case R 682/2011-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 September 2012 in case R 682/2011-4; and

| — | Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the Defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the Defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘DRACULA BITE’, for goods and services in classes 33, 35 and 39 — Community trade mark application No 7588288

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Romanian trade mark registration No 34847 of the figurative mark ‘Dracula’, for goods and services in classes 33 and 35

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 42(2) and 42(3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Carl HILLS, Defendant-Appellant,

No. 73306.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Sept. 29, 1998.

Jennifer Walsh, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SIMON, P.J., and CRANE, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of Count I, assault in the first degree in violation of Section 565.050 RSMo.1994; Count II, burglary in the first degree in violation of Section 569.160 RSMo.1994; Count III, stealing in violation of Section 570.030 RSMo. 1994; Count IV, assault in the second degree in violation of Section 565.060 RSMo.1994; and two counts of aimed criminal action in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo.1994. The judgment also found him to be a prior and persistent offender under Section 558.016 RSMo.1994. He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 25 years on Count I; 20 years on Count II; 20 years on Count III; 20 years on Count IV; and 25 years on Count V, all to be served concurrently.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims *281of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc.
of Nevada;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

                                 /s/ Donald R. Mayer
Date: August 2, 2004            ____________________________________________
                                Donald R. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer
No. 39182.

#### Protest 935080-G of Harry P. Robarts (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
Before the First Division,

September 19, 1940

No. 44348.

#### Protest 926562-G of Olivier Straw Goods Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is wool hat bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.
# C_2015371EN.01004601.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/46

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2015 — Schönberger v Court of Auditors

(Case F-14/12 RENV)

((Civil Service - Officials - Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside - Promotion - 2011 promotion year - Refusal of promotion - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2015/C 371/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Peter Schönberger (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: O. Mader, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Court of Auditors (represented by: B. Schäfer and Í. Ní Riagáin Düro, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the defendant’s decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 in the 2011 promotion year.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | In Cases F-14/12 and F-14/12 RENV, Mr Schönberger shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Court of Auditors. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In Cases F-14/12 and F-14/12 RENV, Mr Schönberger shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Court of Auditors.

| 3. | In Case T-26/14 P, the European Court of Auditors shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Mr Schönberger. |
| --- | --- |

3.

In Case T-26/14 P, the European Court of Auditors shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Mr Schönberger.

---
# C_2012138EN.01003602.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/36

---

Action brought on 21 February 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-25/12)

(2012/C 138/84)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: P. Pradal, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the dispute

Annulment of the Commission decision refusing the applicant the daily subsistence allowance.

Form of order sought by the applicant

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) of the European Commission of 21 November 2011 in response to the objection of the applicant to the decision of the Office for the administration and payment of individual entitlements (PMO) to refuse to grant him the daily subsistence allowance following his entry into service at the European Commission on 1 February 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) of the European Commission of 21 November 2011 in response to the objection of the applicant to the decision of the Office for the administration and payment of individual entitlements (PMO) to refuse to grant him the daily subsistence allowance following his entry into service at the European Commission on 1 February 2011;

| — | decide to grant the applicant the daily subsistence allowance as provided for in Article 71 of the Statute, Article 10(1) of Annex VII to the Statute and Articles 25 and 92 of the CEOS. |
| --- | --- |

—

decide to grant the applicant the daily subsistence allowance as provided for in Article 71 of the Statute, Article 10(1) of Annex VII to the Statute and Articles 25 and 92 of the CEOS.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SOUTH SHORE RESOURCES INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 21st day of May, 2007.



| | RICHARD WACHTER        
| | -----------------------
| | Richard Wachter        
| | Chief Financial Officer
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of EncryptaKey, Inc for the quarter                ended                June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of EncryptaKey,                Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:          | /s/                Kelly Owen                                                                            |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Kelly                Owen                                                                          |
|  Title: |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  October                12, 2007                                                                    |
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1









Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.




New York Branch

1251 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10020-1104

Tel (212) 282-3000 Fax (212) 282-4250

Telex ATT 420802 MCI 170998




January 23, 2008     
          




The Talbots, Inc.

One Talbots Drive

Hingham, Massachusetts 02043

Attention: Edward L. Larsen, Senior Vice President, Finance & CFO



Re: Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2004, as amended between The
Talbots, Inc., as Borrower, and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd., as Lender (the
“Agreement”)



Dear Sirs:



We are in receipt of your letter to us dated December 20, 2007 requesting the extension of
the Maturity Date and Revolving Credit Termination Date (as such terms are defined in the
Agreement) to January 25, 2010. Unless otherwise defined, all capitalized terms used herein
shall have the meanings provided in the Agreement.



We hereby accept and grant such request and accordingly, effective on the date hereof, the
date “January 25, 2008” set forth in the definitions of each of the terms “Maturity Date”
and “Revolving Credit Termination Date” in the Agreement shall be replaced with date
“January 25, 2010”.



Except as expressly set forth herein, this letter shall not, by implication or otherwise,
limit, impair, constitute a waiver of or otherwise affect the rights and remedies of the
Lender under the Agreement, the Note or any other Loan Document and shall not alter,
modify amend or in any way affect any of the terms, conditions, obligations, covenants or
agreements contained in any of the Agreement, the Note and the other Loan Documents, all
of which are ratified and affirmed in all respects and shall continue in full force and
effect.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very Truly Yours,

 	 
	 	/s/ Keiji Takada
 	 
	 	Keiji Takada 	 
	 	Deputy General Manager
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7171

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH B. KUBINSKI,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (3:93-cr-00028-H-1)

Submitted: December 21, 2017 Decided: December 28, 2017

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth B. Kubinski, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth B. Kubinski appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. 

R. Crim. P. 36 motion to remove a factual statement from the presentence report 

associated with his 1994 convictions. Rule 36 motions, however, apply only to clerical 

errors and are not the proper vehicle for challenging the substance of the information in a 

presentence report; such challenges must be filed within 14 days of receiving the report. 

See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2016232EN.01002101.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/21

---

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2016 — Elliniko Kazino Parnithas v Commission

(Case T-14/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Annulment of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 232/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Elliniko Kazino Parnithas AE (Maroussi, Greece) (represented by: N. Niejahr, lawyer, F. Carlin, Barrister, Q. Azau, F. Spyropoulos, I. Dryllerakis, K. Spyropoulos, A. Komninos, K. Struckmann, lawyers, and M. Powell, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, H. van Vliet and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE (Loutraki, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011 on State aid C 16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by Greece in favour of certain Greek casinos (OJ 2011 L 285, p. 25).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Elliniko Kazino Parnithas AE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Elliniko Kazino Parnithas AE.

| 3. | Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.

1

---