alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### I. Freeman & Son, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6871.

Entry No. 741438.

Invoice dated Birmingham, England, October 5, 1945.

Certified October 5, 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 28, 1946.

(Decided February 13, 1947)

*Goldwater & Flynn*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis .for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 4.1


January 11,
2008


Securities and
Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Judiciary Plaza

Washington, DC 20549


	
 

	
 


	
RE:

	
Carnival
 Corporation,

 Commission File No. 1-9610, and Carnival plc, Commission File No. 1-15136





Gentlemen:


Pursuant to
Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc (the
“Companies”) hereby agree to furnish copies of certain long-term debt
instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon the request of the
Commission, and, in accordance with such regulation, such instruments are not
being filed as part of the joint Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Companies
for their year ended November 30, 2007.


Very truly
yours,


CARNIVAL
CORPORATION AND CARNIVAL PLC


	
 

	
 


	
/s/

	
Arnaldo
 Perez


	



	
 


	
Senior Vice
 President, General Counsel

      and Secretary





54
#### The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company *v.*United States

No. 8075.

Entry No. 704514.

(Decided January 14, 1952)

*Eugene R. Pichrell*for the plaintiff.

*Charlee J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the instant appeal for reappraisement covers Cellulose Film in Rolls;

> 2. That the said merchandise was exported from France on June 27, 1951;

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation of the instant merchandise, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of France in the usual wholesale quantities, and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States at U. S. $0,517 per pound, less frais expedition and transport (freight and forwarding charges) and less visa consulaire (consular fee); as invoiced;

> 4. That on or about the date of exportation of the instant merchandise, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in France at a price higher than U. S. $0,517, less frais expedition and transport (freight and forwarding charges) ’and less visa consulaire (consular fee); as invoiced; and

> 5. That the instant appeal for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was United States. $0,517 per pound, less frais expedition and transport (freight and forwarding charges) and less visa consulaire (consular fee); as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

 

In connection with the quarterlyReport of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for thequarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liabilityunder this section.  This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1is expressly incorporated by reference in any such filing.

 

 
| Dated: August 22,  2005 | /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.     |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer        |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunnyside Acres Mobile Estates
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hui
Peng Cheng, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 3, 2008


By: /s/ Hui Peng Cheng
    -------------------------------------
    Hui Ping Cheng
    President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intellon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Harris, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 28, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles E. Harris                            
|                       |  |  |  | Charles E. Harris                                
|                       |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



59
Before the First Division,

October 20, 1941

No. 46483.

#### Protest 985084-G of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the fur dogs in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 41823 the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 (e) was sustained.
CERTIFICATION OF
                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Bytewatch
Technologies, Inc. for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, I, Rick Plotnikoff,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bytewatch Technologies,
Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,
          2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended March 31, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Bytewatch Technologies, Inc.

Dated:    May 14, 2004

BYTEWATCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By:  /s/ Rick Plotnikoff
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
#### Bill TERRY, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION et al., Appellees.

No. 97-2425.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 4, 1998.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1998.

Bill B. Terry, Sharpes, pro se.

John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for Appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.

No Appearance for Bob’s Clams, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See City of Hialeah Gardens v. Prieto,*353 So.2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); §§ 443.036(19), 443.101, Fla. Stat. (1995).

DAUKSCH, W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
132 STAT. 1558 PUBLIC LAW 115–220—JULY 27, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 931: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Mar. 7, considered and passed Senate. 

July 16, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–220 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4910 Brighton 

Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, as the ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. GEORGE SAKATO POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4910 Brighton Boulevard in Denver, Colorado, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘George Sakato Post Office’’. 

Approved July 27, 2018. 

July 27, 2018 

[S. 931] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-747

Lower Tribunal No. 22-CF-014915

_____________________________

WILLYS CASSAMAJOR,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

Bruce Kyle, Judge.

March 26, 2024 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, BROWNLEE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Richards, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Primeplayer  Incorporated  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Alexander  Gilliland,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Alexander Gilliland
-----------------------
Alexander Gilliland
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

Date:   June 6, 2003
No. 43241.

#### Protests 790685-G, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) balls at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, Abstract 27179 followed; (2) squawker balloons at 45 percent under paragraph 409, Abstract 40493 followed; (3) rubber articles like those the subject of Abstract 41517 at 25 percent under paragraph 1537; and (4) tin kazoos at 45 percent under paragraph 397, Abstract 32264 followed.
Case No. 10,028.

#### The NASSAU.

[Blatchf. Pr. Cas. 665.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Nov. 18, 1863.2

Phize — By What Authority Seized — How Held —Liens.

1. Property seized as prize of war .under the law of nations is discharged from all latent liens or incumbrances, and in this respect is distinguishable from property seized as forfeited under the municipal laws of a state.

*11842. Vessels and cargoes seized for a violation of the laws of blockade, or as enemy property, are prize of war under the law of nations, and not under municipal authority.

3. Decree of the district court, refusing to recognize a lien upon the vessel for repairs made and materials furnished prior to the war, affirmed.

[Appeal from the district court of the United States for the Southern district of New York.]

In admiralty.

1

 [Reported by Samuel Blatchford, Esq.]

2

 [Affirmed in *4*Wall. (71 U. S.) 634.]

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

The Nassau was captured on the 28th of May, 1862, by the steamer State of Georgia, while attempting to break the blockade of the port of Wilmington, North Carolina. The vessel has been sold [Case No. 10,026], and a great portion of the cargo, consisting of arms and military equipments, has been appraised and turned over to the government. Harlan and others intervened in the court below, and claimed a lien upon the vessel as material men, and for repairs made upon her at their yard in Wilmington, in the state of Delaware. in the summer of 1860. The amount claimed is some $10,000 and upwards. It is admitted that property seized as prize of war, under the law of nations, is discharged from all latent liens or incumbrances, and, in this respect, is distinguishable from property seized as forfeited under the municipal laws of. a state. The learned counsel for the claimants has, with great industry and ability, sought to bring the case of the seizure of the Nassau within the latter category; but, after the judgment of the court in the case of The Hiawatha [Case No. 6.451], and especially after a state of civil war was recognized by the war-making power under' the constitution, there can be no well-founded doubt that vessels and cargoes seized for a violation of the laws of blockade, ■ or as enemy property, are prize of war under the law of nations, and not under municipal authority. This vessel was, as we have. seen, captured as late as May, 1862. The case of the claimants is, no doubt, a hard one. The remedy, however, is not in the courts, but in an appeal to the government, in.whose hands are the proceeds of the vessel. Decree below affirmed. [Case No. 6,067.)

[The decree in this ease was affirmed upon appeal to the supreme court. 4 Wall. (71 U. S.) 634. See note to Case No. 10,026.)
EXHIBIT 14.1



GLOBAL-TECH APPLIANCES INC.

CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS



This Code of Ethics (the Code) applies to the senior financial officers of Global-Tech Appliances Inc. (the Company), including the Companys principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions (collectively, the Senior Financial Officers). The Companys Senior Financial Officers shall (absent a waiver from the
Companys Board of Directors), to the best of their knowledge and ability, adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing their professional and ethical conduct. The failure to adhere to the Code will result in
the disciplinary action deemed appropriate by the applicable supervisory personnel or by the Companys Board of Directors, which may include termination of employment. Senior Financial Officers shall:



| |  | act in an ethical manner with honesty and integrity;
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------



| |  | ethically handle all actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | provide information that is full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable in all reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) and other public filings or communications made by the Company;
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | faithfully comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; and
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | promptly report to the Audit Committee any violation or suspected violation of the Code.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Each Senior Financial Officer is expected to adhere at all times to this Code. Only the Board of Directors shall have the
authority to approve any deviation or waiver from this Code. Any waiver, either explicit or implicit, including to whom it was granted and the date thereof, and the reasons for it shall be disclosed in the Companys filing on the Form 20-F with
the SEC or, subject to the conditions established by the SEC, posted on the Companys Web site.
No. 48849.

#### Protests 736829-G, etc., of N. Dorman & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 48269. The protests were therefore sustained to this extent.
3.1 Amendment to Articles of Incorporation regarding change of name

                             CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                      TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                                THATLOOK.COM, INC.



We, the undersigned, Gerard A. Powell, President, and Charlie Lynn Trapasso,

Secretary, of thatlook.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Corporation"), do

hereby certify:

                                    I

Pursuant to Section 78.390 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the

Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be amended as follows:


(i). A new second paragraph shall be added to Article IV as follows: In

addition to its authorized class of common stock, the Corporation shall be

authorized to issue a class of 30,000,000 shares of one mill ($0.001) par

value preferred stock, inn such series and with such voting, dividend and

other rights as the Board of Directors may determine.


(ii) Article V of the Company's Articles of Incorporation shall be amended to

read as follows: The Board of Directors of this Corporation shall consist of

at least three members and no more than nine members and, to the extent

permitted under the laws of the State of Nevada, the directors shall have

the authority to fill all vacancies on the Board of Directors and to appoint

directors to fill all unfilled positions thereon.

                                    II

The foregoing amendments were adopted by the votes of the Company's Board of

Directors and the holders of a majority of the Company's outstanding common

stock in accordance with Section 78.390 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.

                                   III

The number of shares entitled to vote on the amendments was 16,290,872.


                                    V

The number of shares voted in favor of each of the amendments was 11,865,890,

with none opposing and none abstaining.


                                         /s/Gerard A. Powell, President
                                         ------------------------------

                                         /s/Charlie Lynn Trapasso, Secretary
                                         -----------------------------------


                            STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

COUNTY OF MONROE

On the 10th day of July, 2000, personally appeared before me, a Notary Public,
Gerard A. Powell and Charlie Lynn Trapasso, who acknowledged that they are the
President and the Secretary, respectively, of thatlook.com, Inc., and that
they are authorized to and did execute the above instrument.



                                        /s/CHRISTINA COOKE,
                                        --------------------
                                        Notary Public
NOTARY PUBLIC
NOTARIAL SEAL
Allentown, Lehigh County
My commission Expires Oct. 2, 2000