Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 4, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 68319 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

This rule will affect the following 

entities, some of which might be small 

entities: The owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit or anchor in 

this portion of the Ouachita River in the 

vicinity of Monroe, LA between 10 a.m. 

and 2 p.m. on October 15, 2016. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule will 

affect your small business, organization, 

or governmental jurisdiction and you 

have questions concerning its 

provisions or options for compliance, 

please contact the person listed in the 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section. The Coast Guard will not 

retaliate against small entities that 

question or complain about this rule or 

any policy or action of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has 

a substantial direct effect on the States, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. We have analyzed 

this rule under that Order and have 

determined that it is consistent with the 

fundamental federalism principles and 

preemption requirements described in 

E.O. 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under E.O. 13175, 

Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments, because it 

will not have a substantial direct effect 

on one or more Indian tribes, on the 

relationship between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. If you 

believe this rule has implications for 

federalism or Indian tribes, please 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such expenditure, we 

do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a 

preliminary determination that this 

action is one of a category of actions that 

do not individually or cumulatively 

have a significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves the 

establishment of a special local 

regulation lasting four hours. Such 

actions are categorically excluded from 

further review under paragraph 34(h) of 

Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist and Categorical Exclusion 

Determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this rule. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places, or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 

NAVIGABLE WATERS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233 

■ 2. Add § 100.35T08–0666 to read as 

follows: 

§ 100.35T08–0666 Special Local 

Regulation; Ouachita River; Monroe, LA. 

(a) Regulated area. A regulated area is 

established to encompass the following 

waterway: all waters of the Ouachita 

River mile 173 through mile 166.5. 

(b) Effective period. This section is 

effective and will be enforced from 10 

a.m. until 2 p.m. on October 15, 2016. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in § 100.801 of 

this part, commercial vessel operators 

desiring to operate in the regulated area 

must contact the Captain of the Port 

Memphis (COTP) to before doing so. 

The COTP or a designated 

representative may be contacted via 

VHF Channel 16 or by telephone at 1– 

866–777–2784. 

(2) During enforcement, all vessels are 

to proceed at slowest speed for safe 

navigation while transiting the regulated 

area. 

(d) Informational broadcasts. The 

COTP or a designated representative 

will inform the public through 

broadcast notices to mariners of the 

enforcement period for the regulated 

area as well as any changes in the dates 

and times of enforcement. 

Dated: September 27, 2016. 

T.J. Wendt, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Memphis, Tennessee. 

[FR Doc. 2016–23973 Filed 10–3–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0189; FRL–9952–03– 

Region 6] 

Promulgation of Air Quality 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Arkansas; Regional Haze and 

Interstate Visibility Transport Federal 

Implementation Plan 

Correction 

In rule document 2016–22508 

beginning on page 66331 in the issue of 

Tuesday, September 27, 2016, make the 

following correction: 

1. On page 66332, in the first column, 

after the DATES heading, the second line, 

‘‘October 27, 2017’’ should read 

‘‘October 27, 2016.’’ 

[FR Doc. C1–2016–22508 Filed 10–3–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1301–00–D 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES