alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10155]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Missouri Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Missouri Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 10 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 12 p.m. on 
Thursday, May 22, 2008. The purpose of this meeting is to conduct SAC 
orientation and plan future activities.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: (866) 364-7584, conference call access code number 
42559706. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund 
any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they 
initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number and contact name Farella E. 
Robinson.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Corrine Sanders of the Central Regional Office and TTY/TDD telephone 
number, by 4:00 p.m. on May 16, 2008.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by May 16, 2008. The 
address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may be e-mailed to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aec8dcc1ccc7c0ddc1c0eedbddcdcddc80c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8aecf8e5e8e3e4f9e5e4cafff9e9e9f8a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>. Records generated by this meeting may be inspected 
and reproduced at the Central Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional 
Office at the above e-mail or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, May 2, 2008.
Christopher Byrnes,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
 [FR Doc. E8-10155 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1)3'**L/~2** 

### -ot C\erk
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1496 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to prohibit the delegation by the 

United States of inspection, certification, and related services to a foreign 

classification society that provides comparable services to Iran, North 

Korea, North Sudan, or Syria and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2011 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, and Mr. BEGICH) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to prohibit the delegation by the United States of inspection, certification, 

and related services to a foreign classification society 

that provides comparable services to Iran, North Korea, 

North Sudan, or Syria and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ethical Shipping In5 spections Act of 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1496 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON DELEGATION OF INSPECTION, CER2 TIFICATION, AND RELATED SERVICES. 

3 Section 3316 of title 46, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(e) The Secretary may not make a delegation, and 

7 shall revoke an existing delegation made, to a foreign clas8 sification society pursuant to subsection (b) or (d) to pro9 vide inspection, certification, or related services if the Sec10 retary of State determines that the foreign classification 

11 society provides comparable services— 

12 ‘‘(1) in Iran, North Korea, North Sudan, or 

13 Syria; or 

14 ‘‘(2) for the government of Iran, North Korea, 

15 North Sudan, or Syria.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connectionwith the Annual Report of International Smart Sourcing, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 29, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, David Hale, Chairman, President, (principal executiveofficer) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant toss 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1.     | The report fully complies   with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange   Act of 1934: and                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | 2.     | The information contained   in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial   condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period   covered by the Report. |

|   |  /s/David Hale                                                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                             |
|   |  David Hale                                                            |
|   | Chairman of the Board of Directors, President (principal executive officer) |
|   | March 28, 2007                                                              |
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (No. 333-83983) of Carreker-Antinori, Inc. and the related
Prospectus, and in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-63517)
pertaining to the Amended and Restated Carreker-Antinori, Inc. 1994 Long Term
Incentive Plan and the Carreker-Antinori, Inc. Director Stock Option Plan of our
report dated March 7, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Carreker-Antinori, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended January 31, 2000.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 26, 2000

                                       59
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Futomic Industries, Inc. for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, I, Francisco Schipperheijn, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Futomic Industries, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.      Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Futomic Industries, Inc. 

 
| Dated: November 14, 2005 |
|--------------------------|

 

**FUTOMIC INDUSTRIES, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Francisco Schipperheijn* |
|-----|-------------------------------|

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
#### Guy B. Barham Co., for Millar & Coe, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6852.

Entry No. 5140.

Invoice dated Bovey Trace, Devon, England, January 14, 1941.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., April 9, 1941.

(Decided February 11, 1947)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (Frank L. Lawrence*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is the appraised value, less the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2



COMPUTER ACCESS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Computer Access Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carmine J. Napolitano, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|Date: November 13, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ CARMINE J. NAPOLITANO                                                  
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |     |  | Carmine J. Napolitano Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### B. Altman *&*Co. *v.*United States

No. 6868.

Entry No. 726837, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, January 1944, etc.

Certified January 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 7, 1944, etc.

(Decided February 13, 1947)

*Marlow & Hines*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kin cheloe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of .counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 45283.

#### Protests 979160-G, etc., of F. W. Woolworth Co. (Los Angeles).

' Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of cabinets in chief value of wood similar to those the subject of Abstract 37636. The claim at 33)4 percent under paragraph 412 was therefore sustained.
[No. 46174.

En Banc.

December 27, 1979.]

#### Valentino Reed, *Petitioner,*v. Pennwalt Corporation, *Respondent.*

*6
      *Critchlow, Williams, Ryals & Schuster*and *Eugene G. Schuster,*for petitioner.

*Leavy, Taber, Crane Bergdahl,*and *Andrew C. Bohrnsen,*for respondent.

*Kathy A. Cochran*and *Steven M. Appelo*on behalf of Washington Association of Defense Counsel and *Daniel F. Sullivan, Ronald Bland, Frank Stubbs,*and *Donovan Flora*on behalf of Washington State Trial Lawyers Association, amici curiae.

Per Curiam.

This case involves a products liability action against Pennwalt Corp., a chemical manufacturer that supplied caustic soda to plaintiff Reed's employer, a potato processor. Ms. Reed claims her skin injuries were caused by defendant's product, the dangers of which she was allegedly inadequately warned. A Franklin County Superior Court jury returned a verdict for the defendant which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, Division Three. *Reed v. Pennwalt Corp.,*22 Wn. App. 718, 591 P.2d 478 (1979). We granted plaintiff's petition for review. *Reed v. Pennwalt Corp.,*92 Wn.2d 1007 (1979).

The appeal record in this case shows that the record on appeal is inadequate to permit review of the merits of the plaintiff's case. CR 51(f) requires that objections to the giving of an instruction or to the refusal to give a requested instruction must be timely and specifically made to the trial court. Compliance with this rule is so important that we *7have enforced the rule sua sponte. *Bitzan v. Parisi,*88 Wn.2d 116, 558 P.2d 775 (1977).

The appeal record here fails to show what, if any, exceptions or objections were made to the allegedly erroneous instructions given the trial jury or to the court's refusal to give requested instructions. Without a record that shows that exceptions were taken under CR 51(f) on the grounds urged on appeal, we are unable to pass upon the merits of the plaintiff's case including the grounds for the decision as set forth by the Court of Appeals.

The appeal therefore must be dismissed and the judgment on the verdict for the defendant affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Reconsideration denied April 9, 1980.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 1698

_____________________________
B RITTANY N. M ACK , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Timothy Register , Judge

.

June 6, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody
, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: March 17, 2008



| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ DONALDB. COHEN                        
| | Donald B. Cohen                           
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology,
      Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jingan Wang, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 14, 2007


/s/
                Jingan WangJingan
                Wang
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

I, Peter T. Kissinger, the Chairman of the Board; President; and Chief Executive
Officer of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., certify that (i) the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods
set forth therein.

| | /s/  Peter T. Kissinger
Peter T. Kissinger
Chairman of the Board
President and
Chief Executive Officer
January 13, 2004
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Michael P. Silvon, the interim Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
Planning and Development of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc., certify that (i) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of the dates and for
the periods set forth therein.

| | /s/  Michael P. Silvon
Michael P. Silvon
Chief Financial Officer (Interim)
Vice President, Planning & Development
January 13, 2004
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2578

___________ Carpenters District Council of Kansas * City Pension Fund, a Trust Fund; Terry * L. Davis, Trustee of the Carpenters * District Council of Kansas City Pension * Fund, Kansas City and Vicinity Welfare * Fund, Kansas City and Vicinity * Apprenticeship and Training Fund; * Jeffrey Chaikin, Trustee of the * Carpenters District Council of Kansas * City Pension Fund and Kansas City and * Vicinity Welfare Fund; Carpenters * District Council of Kansas City and * Vicinity Welfare Fund, a Trust Fund; * Carpenters District Council of Kansas * Appeal from the United States City and Vicinity Apprenticeship and * District Court for the Western Training Fund, a Trust Fund; Joseph E. * District of Missouri. Pink, Trustee of the Carpenters District * Council of Kansas City and Vicinity * [UNPUBLISHED] Apprenticeship and Training Fund, * * Appellees, * * v. * * Graceland Industries, Inc., * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 5, 2005 Filed: August 11, 2005

___________* The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Carpenters District Council of Kansas City Pension Fund and others (plaintiffs) sued Graceland Industries (Graceland), seeking an accounting and unpaid fringe benefit contributions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 1132, 1145. The district court *entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs after Graceland failed to oppose plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion and failed to respond to the court’s show-cause order. The district court then denied Graceland’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion, and Graceland appeals. Having reviewed the record, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s refusal to set aside its order granting summary judgment. See Ivy v. Kimbrough , 115 F.3d 550, 552 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). The purpose of Rule 60(b) relief is not to afford the parties an opportunity to reargue the merits of their case. Graceland’s inability to oppose summary judgment, and counsel’s deficiencies, are not grounds for Rule 60(b) relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); Inman v. Am. Home Furniture Placement, Inc. , 120 F.3d 117, 119 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
No. 44366.

#### Protests 744547-G, etc., of Ed. Schuster & Co., Inc., et al. (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
Order entered January 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01219-CV

LINA CAGGIANO-BOER, Appellant

V.

CORY SCOTT MILLER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-05935-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion to accelerate the appeal and approve 

oral argument. We DENY appellant’s motion.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
No. 43235.

#### Protest 893491-G of New York Mdse. Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of merchandise manufactured in chief value of india rubber similar to that the subject of Abstract 41517. The claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b) was therefore sustained.