alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1,474
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              12,350
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                         0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         62,735
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                            177,876
<ALLOWANCE>                                            760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     260,447
<DEPOSITS>                                         223,270
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  2,743
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          3,901
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          30,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     260,447
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                     12,238
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    2,740
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     1,035
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                    16,013
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   9,817
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9,817
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                6,197
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                           45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      4,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,155
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           2,155
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        6.80
<LOANS-NON>                                            593
<LOANS-PAST>                                             7
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                       723
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                            7
<RECOVERIES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                      760
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                   590
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                170
        


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

January 18, 1939

No. 40462.

#### Protest 969005-G of Herman Plaut (New York).

*549Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the celluloid hairbands in ■question are similar to those the subject of *Plaut*v. *United States*(T. D. 49463). The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained. ' ■
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of USIP.Com,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kathy  Christopher,
Controller  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


s/s Kathy Christopher
Kathy Christopher
Controller, USIP.Com, Inc.

May  9, 2005


USIP.Com,  Inc. does not have a "Chief Financial  Officer," Kathy Christopher is
the principal financial and accounting officer.
#### Marie Ferrara, Plaintiff, *v.*Louis Metz et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Suffolk County,

March 14, 1966.

*Ludwig J. Abruszo*for plaintiff. *Laiorence Newmarh*for defendants.

Jack Stanislaw, J.

Ferrara brought this action to compel defendants Metz to remove certain poplar trees, and to recover damages. These trees are generally within about four feet of plaintiff’s side of the common boundary line of the parties’ respective properties. They were planted by defendants about 10 years ago. Ferrara alleges that at least some of their roots have grown onto her property ever since. Ferrara claims that these roots have disturbed and eroded her property, caused the upheaval of patio blocks around her swimming pool, cracked the pool wall itself, interfered with the filter, and produced unwanted saplings all over the place. It is conceded by plaintiff that in some instances the roots had to travel more than 60 feet to do their damage. Plaintiff has been fighting to halt the growth and spread of these roots since 1962, even to the extent of digging a trench on her side of the line in 1964, all to no avail. Defendants have not responded to her pleas for help. They take the position that plaintiff’s improper digging of ditches and cutting of roots have created and encouraged the separate growth and extension of poplar roots onto plaintiff’s property.

To say there is a paucity of cases on, or even near, the point here would be gross understatement. It has been established that a property owner may resort to self-help in the first instance, to remove roots adversely affecting his own land *(Colombe*v. *City of Niagara Falls,*162 Misc. 594.) Even so, plaintiff’s efforts along these lines have been futile.

The complaint, however, does properly allege a cause of action (cf. *Morrison*v. *City of New Rochelle,*155 N. Y. S. 2d 937). Whether, in the existing situation, the defendants may ultimately be responsible for plaintiff’s alleged damages is a question that has not been resolved in these papers. Specifically, plaintiff’s statement .that she has been told by an expert that the *532objectionable and damaging roots are poplar roots is obviously not enough to support her application for summary judgment.

The motion is denied. Defendants’ request for summary relief is similarly deficient in its attempt to establish the lack of issues of fact. It too is denied. The issues raised require expert development wholly lacking in these papers one way or the other.
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




The Board
of Directors




Bioanalytical
Systems, Inc.




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-56123, 333-56127 and 333-153734) on Form S-8 of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc.
of our report dated January 13, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statement of operations, shareholders’ equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years then ended appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. for the year
ended September 30, 2009.








/s/ Crowe
Horwath LLP


Crowe
Horwath LLP


Indianapolis,
IN


January
13, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 50-387-LR and 50-388-LR; ASLBP No. 07-851-01-LR-BD01] 

                    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29,1972, published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the Commission's regulations,                     *see*10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is being                           ( print page 3169)                        established to preside over the following proceeding:                 

## PPL Susquehanna LLC 

### (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2) 

A Licensing Board is being established pursuant to a November 2, 2006 notice of opportunity for hearing (71 FR 64,566) regarding the September 13, 2006 application for renewal of Operating License Nos. NPF-14 and NFP-22, which authorize PPL Susquehanna LLC (PPL) to operate the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2, at 3489 megawatts thermal. The PPL renewal application seeks to extend the current operating licenses—which expire on July 17, 2022, and March 23, 2024, for Units 1 and 2 respectively—for an additional twenty years. This proceeding concerns the January 2, 2007 request for hearing/petition to intervene filed by Mr. Eric Joseph Epstein. 

The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges: 

Ann Marshall Young, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 

Dr. Kaye D. Lathrop, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 

Dr. William W. Sager, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. 

All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed with the administrative judges in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302. 

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of January 2007. 

E. Roy Hawkens, 

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel. 

[FR Doc. E7-975 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 46443.

#### Protest 56758-K of Burns Lumber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion- by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protest was therefore sustained.
### Source Categories Emissions (tons/yr)%Cumulative
%
Aerospace Industries 8.66E+00 0.10 0.10 Agricultural Chemicals and Pesticides 3.87E-01 0.00 0.10 Asphalt Concrete Manufacturing 7.60E-01 0.01 0.11 Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing 3.42E-01 0.00 0.12 Carburetors, Pistons, Rings and Valves Manufacturing 6.50E-03 0.00 0.12 Cement, Hydraulic (not subject to Portland Cement MACT) 8.10E-02 0.00 0.12 Chemical Preparations 7.50E-01 0.01 0.13 Chemicals and Allied Products, nec 2.60E-02 0.00 0.13 Clay Products Manufacturing 2.80E-02 0.00 0.13 Commercial Physical Research 2.68E-01 0.00 0.13 Condensed and Evaporated milk 2.50E-03 0.00 0.13 Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production [1] 1.76E+01 0.20 0.33 Gasoline Distribution Stage I 3.15E+0336.20 36.53 Hand and Edge Tools Manufacturing 1.35E-01 0.0036.54 Highway And Street Construction 7.13E+00 0.08 36.62 Hydrochloric Acid Production 1.06E+00 0.01 36.63 Industrial Boilers 2.66E+00 0.0336.66 Industrial Organic Chemical Manufacturing 2.52E+00 0.0336.69 Industrial Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing 3.94E+01 0.45 37.14 Institutional/Commercial Heating 5.59E+00 0.0637.21 Iron Foundries 2.50E-03 0.0037.21 Large Appliance (Surface Coating) 1.25E-01 0.0037.21 Lubricating Oils and Greases 1.82E-01 0.0037.21 Manufacturing Industries, nec 1.63E+00 0.02 37.23 Metal Furniture (Surface Coating) 2.50E-01 0.0037.23 Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (MON) 1.75E+01 0.2037.43 Motor Vehicle Equipment 1.55E-02 0.0037.43 Municipal Landfills 1.30E+02 1.5038.93 Natural Gas Transmissions and Storage 2.76E+02 3.1742.10 Nonmetallic Mineral Products Manufacturing 2.50E-03 0.0042.10 Oil and Natural Gas Production 4.15E+0347.73 89.83 Paints and Allied Products Manufacturing 9.50E+00 0.11 89.94 Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals (not subject to Petroleum Refining MACT) 1.69E+00 0.02 89.96 Petroleum Refineries: Other Sources Not Distinctly Listed 1.10E+02 1.26 91.22

Petroleum Refining (not subject to Petroleum Refining MACT)4.61E+01 0.53 91.75 Pharmaceuticals Production 2.37E-02 0.00 91.75 Plastic Parts and Products (Surface Coating) 1.80E-02 0.00 91.75 

### Benzene

Page 1

### Source Categories Emissions (tons/yr)%Cumulative
% Benzene

Plastics Materials and Resins Manufacturing [2] 9.46E+00 0.11 91.86 Potato Chips and Similar Snacks 1.25E-01 0.00 91.86 Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) 3.59E+02 4.12 95.98 Secondary Lead Smelting 1.09E+01 0.13 96.11 Sewage Sludge Incineration 4.49E+00 0.05 96.16 Space Research and Technology 1.25E-01 0.00 96.16 Stationary Combustion Turbines 3.14E+00 0.04 96.20 Stationary Internal Combustion Engines 3.29E+02 3.78 99.98 Taconite Iron Ore Processing 2.35E-03 0.00 99.98 Tire Production 3.70E-02 0.00 99.98 Wood Preserving 1.38E+00 0.02100.00

Total Emissions8701.21100.00

Foot Notes [1] Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production was titled Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production (not subject to petroleum refining MACT) in the May 1999 Report [2] Plastics Materials and Resins Manufacturing (Nov. 2002 Inventory) was titled Polymers and Resins (I,II,IV) in the May 1999 Report

Page 2
Exhibit 31.1
 
 
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, Lana Pope, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Victor Industries, Inc.
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal annual that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting .
 
 
 By/s/ Lana PopeLana Pope, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and TreasurerDate June 16, 2004
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                              SMARTIRE SYSTEMS INC.
                          COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

The Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). A reconciliation of
financial statement amounts from Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP has been
provided in the consolidated financial statements.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Year Ended          Year Ended
                                            July 31, 1998       July 31, 1997
                                            -------------       -------------
($000's except per share data)
<S>                                         <C>                 <C>
Net loss in accordance with
United States GAAP                              (7,099)         $  (4,031)
                                                ======             ====== 

Weighted average number
of common shares
-     Basic                                  5,815,970          3,344,803

Shares issuable upon exercise
of dilutive options, warrants
and convertible debentures                   4,206,853          2,708,509
                                            ----------          ---------

Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding
- Diluted                                   10,022,823          6,053,312
                                            ==========          =========

Loss per share in accordance
with United States GAAP
- Basic                                        $ (1.22)           $ (1.21)
                                               =======            =======

-Diluted                                       $ (0.71)           $ (0.67)
                                               =======            =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WealthCraft Systems Inc.
("WealthCraft") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kelly Jay
Michael Tallas, Chief Executive Officer of WealthCraft, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/   Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
------------------------------
Name: Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 13, 2007
EXHIBIT A
                                     ---------
                 FORM OF SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT
                 -------------------------------------

            SUPPLEMENT NO.     TO SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED AS OF
                                BETWEEN
 COOPERATIVE IMAGES, INC. and ELECTIVE INVESTMENTS, INC. (the BORROWER)
                                   AND
               BOYLE LEASING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the LENDER)

     WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Lender entered into a certain Revolving
Credit Agreement, dated as of (which agreement, as the same may have been or
thereafter may be amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise, the LOAN
AGREEMENT) pursuant to which the Lender agreed to make Loans to the Borrower
in an amount not be exceed Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000.00);
     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Borrower and the Lender
entered into a certain Security Agreement dated as of (the SECURITY
AGREEMENT);
     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Borrower is obligated with
the making of each Loan to the Borrower to deliver to the Lender supplements
to the Security Agreement (which agreement, as the same may have been or
hereafter may be amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise, each, a
Security Agreement Supplement and collectively the Security Agreement
Supplements) and describing the Consumer Note Agreements which shall
constitute the Collateral for such Loan, and it is therefore a condition
precedent to the obligation of the Lender to make or maintain the Loans that
the Borrower shall execute and deliver to the Lender this Security Agreement
Supplement;
     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows (capitalized
terms which are not defined therein shall have the meanings given to them in
the Loan Agreement).
     The Security Agreement is hereby amended and supplemented by the addition
thereto (in addition to any other Collateral added by previous Security
Agreement Supplements) of the Consumer Note Agreements listed on Exhibit T
annexed hereto.
     Except as supplemented by this Supplement, the Security Agreement shall
continue unchanged and remain in full force and effect.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Supplement to be
duly executed this       day of       1997,

WITNESS:       COOPERATIVE IMAGES, INC. and ELECTIVE INVESTMENTS, INC.

               By: /s/ Gerard A. Powell
                   --------------------
                   Gerard A. Powell, Chief Executive Officer

               BOYLE LEASING TECHNOLOGIES,INC.

               By: /s/ J. Gregory Hines
                   --------------------
                   J. Gregory Hines, Vice-President
(Reap. Dec. 9103)

#### Kaufman & Vinson Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 885311.

(Decided March 21, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.