alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           5,252                   3,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      779                     727
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (103)                   (103)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,278                   7,112
<PP&E>                                          26,166                  21,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,843)                 (5,356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,833                  44,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,629                   7,943
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          5                       6
<COMMON>                                             6                       4
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,666                  23,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,833                  44,937
<SALES>                                         58,909                  44,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,909                  44,154
<CGS>                                           49,079                  35,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,269                  39,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (483)                   (126)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,004                   1,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,025                   2,550
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,561                 (1,356)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,463                   3,906
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                      62
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,463                   3,846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34                    0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34                    0.63


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 333-63517) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Carreker
Corporation 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan and the Carreker Corporation Director
Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 7, 2001, (except for Note 11, as to
which the date is April 11, 2001), with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Carreker Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended January 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 26, 2001
# C_2014102EN.01003402.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/34

---

Order of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Lídl Music (LIDL)

(Case T-226/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark LIDL - Earlier national figurative mark LÍDL MUSIC - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 15(1) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2014/C 102/54

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: initially by M. Schaeffer, M. Wolter and A. Marx, and subsequently by M. Wolter, A. Marx and M. Kefferpütz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Lídl Music spol. s r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 March 2012 (Case R 2380/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Lídl Music spol. s r.o. and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2017.

1

---
# C_2012373EN.01001102.xml

| 1.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/11

---

Action brought on 5 October 2012 — Trefilerías Quijano v Commission

(Case T-439/12)

2012/C 373/18

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Trefilerías Quijano, SA (Los Corrales de Buelna, Spain) (represented by: F. González Díaz and P. Herrero Prieto, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul, pursuant to Article 264 TFEU, the decision of the European Commission of 25 July 2012 in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, pursuant to Article 264 TFEU, the decision of the European Commission of 25 July 2012 in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel;

| — | require the Commission to provide, in accordance with Article 24 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 64(3)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the documents, calculations and other matters of law and/or fact that served as the basis to grant the requests for inability to pay of Proderac, CB, ITAS, OriMartin and Siderúrgica Latina Martin and/or to accept the reduction in the fine of AreclorMittal; |
| --- | --- |

—

require the Commission to provide, in accordance with Article 24 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 64(3)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the documents, calculations and other matters of law and/or fact that served as the basis to grant the requests for inability to pay of Proderac, CB, ITAS, OriMartin and Siderúrgica Latina Martin and/or to accept the reduction in the fine of AreclorMittal;

| — | in any event, order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and the main arguments are the same as those raised in Case T-438/12 Global Steel Wire v Commission.

Global Steel Wire

Commission

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



NOBEL LEARNING COMMUNITIES, INC.



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



In connection with the Annual Report of Nobel Learning Communities, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George H. Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that
based on my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                         |  |                           
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------
|                         |  | /s/    GEORGE H.
BERNSTEIN
|                         |  | Name: George H. Bernstein 
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer   
|                        
|Date: September 19, 2005
Exhibit 23.1

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-56123)  pertaining to the Bioanalytical  Systems, Inc. 1997 Employee
Incentive  Stock  Option Plan and in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.
333-56127)  pertaining to the 1997 Bioanalytical  Systems, Inc. Outside Director
Stock  Option Plan of our report  dated  November 1, 2002,  with  respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Bioanalytical Systems, Inc. incorporated by
reference in its 2002 Annual Report  (Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K) for the year
ended  September  30, 2002 filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
January 24, 2003
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
The Quantum Group, Inc.
File No. 000-31727


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.


IN CONNECTION WITH THE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE QUANTUM GROUP, INC. (THE
"COMPANY") ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JULY 31, 2005 AS FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON THE DATE HEREOF (THE "REPORT"), I, DONALD
B. COHEN CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE COMPANY, CERTIFY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002, THAT: (1) THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13(A)
OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934; AND (2) THE INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS, THE FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY.


                                                    By:  /s/ Donald B. Cohen
Date September 16, 2005                                  -----------------------
                                                         Donald B. Cohen
                                                         Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Quantum Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Quantum Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Joe Brown NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-3676.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 28, 1998.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. Germanowiez, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. However, this case is remanded back to the trial court for entry of a written order of probation.

GUNTHER, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
No. 74-6011.

#### Porzuczek, Guardian *v.*County of San Mateo et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 54405.

#### Haas Bros. dba Terminal Liquors, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 128159-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

November 13, 1942

No. 47720.

#### Protest 964547-G of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 38680, the marcel irons in question were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339. The brass base shells, stipulated to be similar to those the subject of Abstract 37615 and *New York Merchandise Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607), were held dutiable at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 353 as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, as claimed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN RAY GHOLAR,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JAMES A. YATES, Warden,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-17388

D.C. No. 1:12-cv-01182-LJO-SAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 14, 2014 ** 

Before: LEAVY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

John Ray Gholar appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging denial of access to the courts. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wilhelm v.

Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C.

FILED

OCT 21 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1915A); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order)

(dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Gholar’s action because Gholar failed

to allege sufficient facts to show any actual injury due to the alleged inadequate

prison law library access. See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 348-49 (1996)

(access-to-courts claim requires the plaintiff to show that the defendants’ conduct

caused actual injury to a non-frivolous legal claim).

Appellee’s request for judicial notice is granted. See Fed. R. Evid. 201.

AFFIRMED.

1

2 13-17388
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WealthCraft Systems Inc.
("WealthCraft") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kelly Jay Michael
Tallas, Chief Executive Officer of WealthCraft, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
----------------------------
Name: Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of tw telecom inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Larissa L. Herda, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Larissa L. Herda
|Name: Larissa L. Herda 
|                       
|Date: February 12, 2010
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Carreker Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending January 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terry L. Gage, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/TERRY L. GAGETerry L. Gage, Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

Dated:
April 30, 2003

---

QuickLinks
No. 49512.

#### Protests 893332-G, etc., of A. L. Tuska Son *&*Co., Inc., et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the First Division,

June 7, 1951

No. 55617.

#### E. Guralsky *v.*United States,

protest 164213-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance-with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of football players similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(24 Cust. Ct. 77, C. D. 1211), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 3.1

 

[SEAL]**DEAN HELLER**Secretary of State**206 North Carson Street**Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299**(775) 684-5708**Website:  secretaryofstate.biz

**Certificate of Amendment(PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 and 78.390)**Certificate of Amendment to Articles of IncorporationFor Nevada Profit Corporations(Pursuant to NRS 78.835 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)
- Name of corporation:  
FIRSTBINGO.COM
  The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):
The name of the corporation is **SOUTH SHORE RESOURCES INC.**The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is : 
28,133,000 shares - 83.41%
- Effective date of filing (optional):   11/1/06                                      (must not be later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)  Officer Signature (required):   **RICHARD L. WACHTER**                                              Richard L. Wachter, President
*   If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.
**IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.

 

 

 

 ******************
# C_2015046EN.01000701.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 December 2014 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-243/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 2008/1/EC - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Existing installation - Authorisation procedure - Procedures under way - Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations - Non-implementation - Article 260(2) TFEU - Pecuniary penalties - Lump sum - Penalty payment))

(2015/C 046/08)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Petrova and J. Enegren, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: E. Karlsson, A. Falk and S. Johannesson, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court (Fifth Chamber) hereby:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice in Commission v Sweden (C-607/10, EU:C:2012:192), Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice in Commission v Sweden (C-607/10, EU:C:2012:192), Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU;

| 2. | Declares that, if the failure to fulfil obligations found in point 1 has continued until the date of delivery of this judgment, the Kingdom of Sweden shall be ordered to pay to the European Commission, into the ‘European Union own resources’ account, a penalty payment of EUR 4  000 for each day of delay in taking the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 23 November 2006 in Commission v Sweden (C-607/10, EU:C:2012:192), from the date of delivery of this judgment until the date on which the first judgment has been complied with; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that, if the failure to fulfil obligations found in point 1 has continued until the date of delivery of this judgment, the Kingdom of Sweden shall be ordered to pay to the European Commission, into the ‘European Union own resources’ account, a penalty payment of EUR 4  000 for each day of delay in taking the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 23 November 2006 in Commission v Sweden (C-607/10, EU:C:2012:192), from the date of delivery of this judgment until the date on which the first judgment has been complied with;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay to the European Commission, into the ‘European Union own resources’ account, a lump sum of EUR 2 0 00  000; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay to the European Commission, into the ‘European Union own resources’ account, a lump sum of EUR 2 0 00  000;

| 4. | Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

1

---
No. 55565.

#### Hallett & Chard *v.*United States,

protests 887645-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00097

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.I.W.

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI20395

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ , AND JUSTICE

VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant ’s motion to dismiss is

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. No costs of appeal are assessed against appellant.

SIGNED Ju ne 23, 2021.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice