alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. ID-3102-000] 

Take notice that on May 11, 2007, Billy C. Harbin filed an Application for Authorization to Hold Interlocking Positions, pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 11, 2007.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

 [FR Doc. E7-9991 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2014135EN.01001302.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Posteshop SpA — Divisione Franchising Kipoint v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Case C-52/13) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2006/114/EC - Concepts of ‘misleading advertising’ and ‘comparative advertising’ - National legislation providing that misleading advertising and unlawful comparative advertising are two separate unlawful acts))

2014/C 135/14

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Posteshop SpA — Divisione Franchising Kipoint

Applicant:

Defendants: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

Defendants:

Interveners: Cg srl, Tacoma srl

Interveners:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Consiglio di Stato — Interpretation of Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 21) — Unfair business practices between traders — Concept of ‘misleading advertising and comparative advertising’ — National legislation which not only prohibits advertising that is at the same time misleading and based on unlawful comparison but also provides that misleading advertising and comparative advertising are two separate offences.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

With regard to the protection afforded to traders, Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising is to be interpreted as referring to misleading advertising and unlawful comparative advertising as two independent infringements and to the effect that, in order to prohibit and penalise misleading advertising, it is not necessary that that latter at the same time should constitute unlawful comparative advertising.

---

(1)  OJ C 123, 27.4.2013.

1

---
#### Boas, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States

No. 7853.

Entry No. 4731, etc.

(Decided July 10, 1950)

■' *Wallace Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

MollisoN, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between counsel in the matter of the above reappraisement appeals, subject to the approval of the Court, that the appraisements in the said appeals were made in the same manner as the appraisements in the case of *United States*v. *Gothic Watch Co.,*Reap. Dec. 7712 affirming the judgment in Reap. Dec. 7438; and that the issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as the issues in said cited case; and that the record in said Reap. Dec. 7712 may be incorporated into the records of the above appeals.

> IT IS FURTHER AGREED that the above appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that the attempted appraisement embodied in the second return of value by the appraiser of the merchandise covered by each of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the annexed schedule, which is marked “A” and made a part of this decision, was illegal, null, and void, and that the appraiser’s original return of value in each case, as reported by him to the collector of customs, constituted his appraisal of the merchandise pursuant to section 500 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1500), and was final and conclusive in the absence of any appeal pursuant to section 501 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1501).

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6851.

Entry No. 752481.

Invoice dated Birmingham, England, March 12, 1946.

Certified March 19, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 18, 1946.

(Decided February 6, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant,

Laweence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United Stales*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 44334.

#### Protests 892380-G, etc., of John Thallon & Co., Inc. (New York).

*317Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 3)4 cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, on the basis of the net weight of the contents of the cans less 10 percent allowance for the gelatinous material.
EXHIBIT 99

                               SECURED DATA, INC.

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Art Malone, solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that to my knowledge the Quarterly Report of Secured Data, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Secured
Data, Inc.


Date: May 23, 2003                      By: /s/ Art Malone
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Art Malone
                                           Chief Executive Officer
# C_2014439EN.01001201.xml

| 8.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Ferrol — Spain) — Ministerio de Defensa, Navantia SA v Concello de Ferrol

(Case C-522/13) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Competition - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Property tax on immovable property - Tax exemption))

(2014/C 439/16)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Ferrol

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ministerio de Defensa, Navantia SA

Applicants:

Defendant: Concello de Ferrol

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

On a proper construction of Article 107(1) TFEU, the exemption from property tax of a plot of land belonging to the State and made available to an undertaking whose capital is wholly State-owned and which produces, from that plot of land, goods and services that may be traded between Member States on markets open to competition may constitute State aid prohibited by that provision. It is for the referring court, however, to determine whether, in the light of all the relevant evidence in the dispute before it, assessed by reference to the interpretative guidance provided by the Court of Justice of the European Union, that tax exemption falls to be categorised as State aid within the meaning of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.

1

---
No. 48244.

#### Protests 24087-K, etc., of Arnhold & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of California Clean Air, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 14, 2005              /s/ STEPHEN D. WILSON

                                      Stephen D. Wilson
                                      Title: President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                      Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
                                      Accounting Officer, Director
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. sec. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr.,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May  14, 2004 | /s/Henry J.  Boucher, Jr.              |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Henry J.  Boucher, Jr.,                |
|                 | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Devone Nash, Appellant.

[699 NYS2d 887]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered February 25, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*335Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

We agree with the defendant’s contention that the erroneous denial of his challenge for cause to a prospective juror constitutes reversible error because he had exhausted all of his peremptory challenges before the completion of jury selection (see, CPL 270.20 [2]; *People v Torpey,*63 NY2d 361, 365; *People v White,*260 AD2d 413; *People v Molinari,*252 AD2d 532).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.
No. 47049.

#### Protests 19242-K, etc., of John Zimmermann Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise consists of hemp knotted straw hats, not blocked or trimmed and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, similar to those involved in Abstract 46497. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
EXHIBIT 99.1

August 31, 2010

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F. Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read Item 16F of the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the Form 20-F) dated August 31, 2010, of Global-Tech Advanced
Innovations Inc. and are in agreement with the statements contained in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of Item 16F(a). We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.

Regarding the registrants statement concerning the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting included in the third paragraph
of Item 16F(a) on page 56 of the Form 20-F, we had considered such matters in determining the nature, timing and extent of procedures performed in audits of the registrants consolidated financial statements for each of the two years ended
March 31, 2009.



|                 
|-----------------
|Very truly yours,
|                 
|/s/ Ernst & Young
|Hong Kong
**EXHIBIT 32.1****906 CERTIFICATION**     The certification set forth below is being submitted inconnection with the Form 10-K Annual Report (the“Report”) for the purpose of complying withRule 13–14(b) or Rule 15d–14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code.     David H. Clarke, the Chief Executive Officer and Jeffery B.Park, the Chief Financial Officer of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc., eachcertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:          a. the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and           b. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc.           /s/ David H. Clarke           Name: David H. Clarke *Chief Executive Officer*      /s/ Jeffery B. Park           Name: Jeffrey B. Park *Chief Financial Officer*Date: December 15, 2005
104
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1962 

To make the internal control reporting and assessment requirements of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 optional for certain smaller companies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2011 

Mr. DEMINT (for himself and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To make the internal control reporting and assessment requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 optional 

for certain smaller companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Startup Expansion and 

5 Investment Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1962 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM THE INTERNAL CONTROL RE2 PORTING AND ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS. 

3 Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 

4 U.S.C. 7262) is amended by striking subsection (c) and 

5 inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(c) EXEMPTION.—The Commission’s rules under 

7 subsection (a) shall permit an issuer to elect not to provide 

8 the assessment described in subsection (a)(2) and the at9 testation thereof described in subsection (b) if the issuer— 

10 ‘‘(1) has a total market capitalization for the 

11 relevant reporting period of less than 

12 $1,000,000,000; and 

13 ‘‘(2) is not subject to the annual reporting re14 quirement under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Secu15 rities Exchange Act of 1934. 

16 ‘‘(d) DISCLOSURE.—An issuer that, pursuant to sub17 section (c), elects not to provide the assessment described 

18 in subsection (a)(2) and the attestation described in sub19 section (b), shall disclose that decision in the next report 

20 required under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Ex21 change Act of 1934.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MILLENNIUM CAPITAL VENTURE HOLDINGS,
INC.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Francis Mailhot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



By:  /s/ Francis Mailhot
     ----------------------------------------
     Francis Mailhot, Chief Executive
     Officer

Dated: March 16, 2005
February 9, 1940

No. 43228.

#### Protests 782611-G, etc., of Central Medeira Corporation.

Abstract 42890. Application by plaintiff for rehearing granted.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Sino Clean Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Baowen Ren, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and




(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company at the date and for the periods
      indicated.




Dated: November
      16, 2009
              /s/ Baowen RenBaowen
      RenChief
      Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Nortel
Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  November 2, 2005
/s/ WILLIAM A. OWENSWilliam A. Owens
Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Dated:  November 2, 2005
/s/ PETER W. CURRIEPeter W. CurrieExecutive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Rolls Razor, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6144.

Invoice dated London, England, March 4, 1942.

Certified March 6, 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 14, 1942.

Entry No. 17704.

(Decided May 9, 1945)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement covers certain razors imported from England.

*421Tbe uncontradicted evidence discloses the following facts:

1. That the issues in the instant appeal are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.,*decided on March 5, 1945, Suit No. 4481, C. A. D. 305; and that the record in the cited case has been incorporated herein.

2. That the entered value of each item represents the statutory cost of production thereof.

I therefore find the proper basis of value for the involved merchandise to be the cost of production as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such values are the entered values.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.