alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of Sonoma  Valley  Bancorp (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  We, Mel
Switzer,  Jr., Chief  Executive  Officer and Mary Dieter Smith,  Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Dated: August 5, 2005        /s/ Mel Switzer, Jr.
     ----------------        --------------------------------------------------
                             Mel Switzer, Jr.,
                             Chief Executive Officer
                             (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: August 5, 2005        /s/ Mary Dieter Smith
     ----------------        --------------------------------------------------
                             Mary Dieter Smith,
                             Executive Vice President and
                             Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                             (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNIFAB
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S DECEMBER 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      17,929,316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,546,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    908,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,296,057
<PP&E>                                      10,784,030
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,401,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,417,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,315,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,223
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,771,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,417,838
<SALES>                                     13,469,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,469,749
<CGS>                                       11,056,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,772,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,910,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                   673,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,237,139
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,237,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 90 (Thursday, May 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 26143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-21870-15, F-21870-16, F21870-19, and F-19154-05; AK-964-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving the surface and subsurface estates in 
certain lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims 
Settlement Act will be issued to NANA Regional Corporation Inc. The 
lands are in the vicinity of the Native villages of Ambler, Kobuk, and 
Shungnak, Alaska, and are located in:

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

T. 19 N., R. 3 E.,
    Secs. 4 to 9, inclusive;
    Secs. 13 to 36, inclusive.

    Containing approximately 18,996 acres.

T. 19 N., R. 7 E.,
    Secs. 1 to 36, inclusive.

    Containing approximately 22,660 acres.

T. 18 N., R. 10 E.,
    Secs. 1 to 16, inclusive;
    Secs. 21 to 28, inclusive;
    Secs. 33 to 36, inclusive.

    Containing approximately 17,596 acres.

T. 17 N., R. 11 E.,
    Secs. 1 to 36, inclusive.

    Containing approximately 20,981 acres.

    Aggregating approximately 80,233 acres.

    Notice of the decision will also be published four times in The 
Arctic Sounder.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until June 9, 2008 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#096862276b6564276a66677f6c7068676a6c496862276b6564276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="31505a1f535d5c1f525e5f475448505f525471505a1f535d5c1f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Jason Robinson,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication I.
 [FR Doc. E8-10224 Filed 5-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 39195.

#### Protests 628543-G, etc., of Coffee Products of America (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the record presented the claim for free entry under paragraph 1722 was sustained. •
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on form 10-QSB of Futomic
Industries, Inc. for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, I, Ken Tetterington,
Chief Financial Officer of Futomic Industries, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such quarterly report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Futomic
          Industries, Inc.


Dated:    November 22, 2004

FUTOMIC INDUSTRIES, INC.

By:  /s/ Ken Tetterington
-----------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bytewatch Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Plotnikoff, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|By: | /s/   Richard Plotnikoff
Richard PlotnikoffChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 16, 2005
1 A t t a c h m e n t

A s r e qu e s t e d b y E P A, PP EC i s p r

ovi d i n g t h e

a t tac h e d l e t t e r, w h i c h pr o v i d e s a l e v e l 2 v i s i b ili t y a n a l y s i s f o r
s e n s i t iv e C l ass II a r e as

. T h i s l e tt

e r i s p r ovi d e d as a n a d d i t i o n t

o t h e r e c o rd s upp o rt i n g P P EC

’ s P S D p e r m i t

a p p li c a t io n

.

Pl e as e l e t m e k n o w i f y o u h av e a n y qu e s t i o n s

.

S t e v e H ill P i o P i c o P S D A pp l i c a ti on V i s i b ilit y A n a l ys i s S t e v e H il l t o : G er a r do Ri os, R og e r K ohn, Cl e v e l a nd H o ll a d a y 03 / 19 / 2012 12 : 05 P M C c : D a v e J e nk i ns, " g rc h a nd l e r @ a p e xpo w e r g r oup. c om "
, C r a i g K e bod e a ux, " M c K i ns e y, John A

. "
, G ar y R ub e ns t e i n, " Moo r e , S t e v e " H i d e D e t a i l s F r o m: S t e v e H ill < S H ill @s i e rr a re s e ar c h. c o m> S o r tL i s t

...

To : G er a r do Ri os /R 9 /U S E P A / U S @E P A
, R og e r K ohn /R 9 / U S E P A/U S @E P A
, C l e v e l a nd H o l l a d a y /R 9 /

U S E P A/U S @E P A

C c : D a v e J e nk i ns < d

j e nk i ns@ ap e xpo w e r g r oup. c o m> , " g rc h a nd l er @ a p e xpo w e r g r o u p. c om "

< g r c h a nd l e r @ ap e xpo w er g r oup. c o m> , C r a i g K e bod e a ux < C r a i g. K e bod e a ux@k i e w i t

. c o m> ,
" M c K i ns e y, John A

. " < J A M C K IN S E Y @s t o e l

. c o m> , G ar y R ub e ns t e i n < G R ub e ns t e i n@s i e r rar e s e a rc h. c o m> , " Moo r e , S t e v e " < S t e v e .Moo r e @sd c oun t y. c a .gov>

H i s t o r y : Th i s m e ss a g e h a s b e e n f o rwar d e d

.

V i s i b i l it y a n a l y s i s

_ 03

- 19

- 1 2

. p df P a g e 1 o f 1

3 / 26 / 2012 f i l e : / /C: \ D o c u m e n t s a nd S e tti ngs \ c ho ll a d a\ Lo c a l S e tt i ngs \ T e mp \ no t e s D F 63 F 8 \

~ w e b7 0 97.h

...
MARK ROSS
 c/o Rubicon Minerals Corporation
 P.O. Box 274,
 103 McMarmac Road,
 Cochenour, Ontario, Canada
 P0V 1L0
 Phone: 1-807-662-7026
   CONSENT
    March 26, 2014
  Rubicon Minerals Corporation
 Suite 1540 – 800 West Pender Street,
 Vancouver, B.C.
 V6C 2V6
  And
  United States Securities and Exchange Commission
   Dear Sirs/Mesdames:
 
 I hereby consent to being named in the Annual Information Form of the Company, dated March 26, 2014 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “AIF”) and to the use of the technical and scientific information I have reviewed and approved relating to the Company’s properties, which information is contained in the AIF and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
  I also consent to the incorporation by reference of the above information into Rubicon Minerals Corporation’s Registration Statement (No. 333-194076) on Form F-10.
   Sincerely,
  /s/ “Mark Ross”
  Mark Ross,B.Sc., P.Geo
 Chief Mine Geologist
 Rubicon Minerals Corporation
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of DCI USA, Inc. (the "Company")
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 17, 2005                               /s/ Jonathan Ilan Ofir
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Jonathan Ilan Ofir
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(Reap. Dec. 9054)

#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 942449; 721936; 957627.

(Decided January 23, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawRence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated above were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a)' of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the records in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Norma JOHNSON v. PLAYERS LAKE CHARLES, INC.

No. 98-CC-2728.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Players Lake Charles, Inc.;— Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Calca-sieu 14th Judicial District Court Div. “A” Number 97-970; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CW98-1327.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel.
# C_2014184EN.01000702.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/7

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 January 2014 — Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

a

(Case C-324/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Word mark PATRICIA ROCHA - Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROCHAS - Refusal to register by the Opposition Division of OHIM - Inadmissibility of the action brought before the Board of Appeal of OHIM))

2014/C 184/10

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda (represented by: A. J. Rodrigues, advogado)

Appellant:

a

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 April 2013 in Case T-360/11 Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços v OHIM — Parfums Rochas (PATRIZIA ROCHA) by which the General Court dismissed an action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 April 2011 (Case R 2355/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Parfums Rochas SAS and Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda

Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços

OHIM — Parfums Rochas (PATRIZIA ROCHA)

a

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda. is ordered to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda. is ordered to pay the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 07.09.2013.

1

---
NO. 07-08-0218-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	NOVEMBER 24, 2008

	______________________________

	MARK ANTHONY MARTINEZ, 

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

	NO.  A16898-0608; HON. ROBERT W. KINKAID, JR., PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Anders Opinion

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	Mark Anthony Martinez (appellant) appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child.  Pursuant to an agreement, he pled guilty to the offense and was granted eight years deferred adjudication.  The State subsequently filed a motion to proceed with the adjudication of his guilt.  It alleged that he had 1) used cocaine while on probation, 2) failed to make his monthly reports, 3) failed to complete his community service hours, 4) failed to attend AA/NA meetings as ordered, and 5) failed to complete a sex offenders program.  At the hearing, appellant pled true to the allegations contained in the motion.  The trial court then found that the allegations were true, adjudicated appellant guilty, allowed opportunity to present evidence relating to punishment, and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. 

	Appellant's counsel has now moved to withdraw, after filing a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and representing that he has searched the record and found no arguable grounds for reversal.  The motion and brief illustrate that counsel notified appellant of his right to review the appellate record and file his own brief or response.  So too did we inform appellant that any pro se response or brief he cared to file had to be filed by November 12, 2008.  To date, appellant has failed to file a response.

	In compliance with Anders, appellate counsel addressed one potential ground for appeal and explained why it was baseless.  We, like appellate counsel, also reviewed the record to determine whether there existed reversible error and found none.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (requiring us to conduct an independent review).

	Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of the trial court.1 					

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice 

Do not publish.
No. 39198.

#### Petition 5520-R of McCabe Bros. Co. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the merchandise was invoiced at 29)4 cents per bushel of 34 pounds while the appraiser found a value of 29)4 cents per bushel of 32 pounds. It was established that 34 pounds was the proper number of pounds per bushel in Canada. From the evidence it was found that the importer acted in entire good faith. The petition was therefore granted.
# C_2012273EN.01001301.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/13

---

Action brought on 28 June 2012 — Cartoon Network v OHIM — Boomerang TV (BOOMERANG)

(Case T-285/12)

2012/C 273/22

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Cartoon Network, Inc. (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: I. Starr, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Boomerang TV, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 April 2012 in case R 699/2011-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 April 2012 in case R 699/2011-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay to the applicant, the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay to the applicant, the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘BOOMERANG’ for services in classes 38 and 41

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 1160050 of the figurative mark ‘Boomerang TV’, for services in class 41

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---