alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1947 

AN ACT 

To prohibit attendance of an animal fighting venture, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1947 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Animal Fighting Spec3 tator Prohibition Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ATTENDING AN ANIMAL FIGHT OR 

5 CAUSING A MINOR TO ATTEND AN ANIMAL 

6 FIGHT. 

7 Section 26 of the Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 

8 2156) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 

10 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘SPON11 SORING OR EXHIBITING AN ANIMAL IN’’ and in12 serting ‘‘SPONSORING OR EXHIBITING AN ANI13 MAL IN, ATTENDING, OR CAUSING A MINOR TO

14 ATTEND’’; 

15 (B) in paragraph (1)— 

16 (i) in the heading, by striking ‘‘IN

17 GENERAL’’ and inserting ‘‘SPONSORING OR

18 EXHIBITING’’; and 

19 (ii) by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ and 

20 inserting ‘‘paragraph (3)’’; 

21 (C) by redesignating paragraph (2) as 

22 paragraph (3); and 

23 (D) by inserting after paragraph (1) the 

24 following new paragraph: 

25 ‘‘(2) ATTENDING OR CAUSING A MINOR TO AT26 TEND.—It shall be unlawful for any person to— 
3 

†S 1947 ES

1 ‘‘(A) knowingly attend an animal fighting 

2 venture; or 

3 ‘‘(B) knowingly cause a minor to attend an 

4 animal fighting venture.’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (g), by adding at the end the 

6 following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(5) the term ‘minor’ means a person under the 

8 age of 18 years old.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL FIGHTING PROHIBI10 TIONS. 

11 Section 49 of title 18, United States Code, is amend12 ed— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘Whoever’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) 

14 IN GENERAL.—Whoever’’; 

15 (2) in subsection (a), as designated by para16 graph (1) of this section, by striking ‘‘subsection 

17 (a),’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(1),’’; and 

18 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub19 sections: 

20 ‘‘(b) ATTENDING AN ANIMAL FIGHTING VENTURE.— 

21 Whoever violates subsection (a)(2)(A) of section 26 of the 

22 Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2156) shall be fined under 

23 this title, imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both, 

24 for each violation. 
4 

†S 1947 ES

1 ‘‘(c) CAUSING A MINOR TO ATTEND AN ANIMAL

2 FIGHTING VENTURE.—Whoever violates subsection 

3 (a)(2)(B) of section 26 (7 U.S.C. 2156) of the Animal 

4 Welfare Act shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for 

5 not more than 3 years, or both, for each violation.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 4, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1947 

AN ACT 

To prohibit attendance of an animal fighting 

venture, and for other purposes.
No. 40506.

#### Protests 933839-G, etc., of Anderson *&*Meyer et al. (San Francisco, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
|  | (a) | the      Form 10-K/A Annual Report of the Company for the year ended September 30,      2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (b) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.. |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:  /s/  Richard M.      Shepperd |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard      M. Shepperd                               |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer                           |
|   | Date:  February      10, 2010                |

|   | By:  /s/  Michael R.      Cox |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael      R. Cox                               |
|   | Vice      President, Finance and Administration   |
|   | and      Chief Financial Officer                  |
|   | Date:  February      10, 2010           |

----
# C_2015146EN.01000801.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/8

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 January 2015 — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA, Telefónica SA v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-587/13 P and C-588/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeals - Aid scheme provided for under Spanish tax legislation - Corporate tax provision which enables undertakings established in Spanish territory to write off the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of a shareholding in undertakings which are not established in that territory - Decision declaring the State aid scheme incompatible with the internal market))

(2015/C 146/11)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA, Telefónica SA (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado and J. Domínguez Pérez, abogados, and M. Núñez Müller, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeals are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeals are dismissed.

| 2. | Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA and Telefónica SA shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA and Telefónica SA shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 15, 18.1.2014.

1

OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

---
No. 47729.

#### Protest 68891-K of N. Y. Merchandise Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Heinrich Herrmann & Weiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30), the claim at only 50 percent under paragraph 1506 was sustained.
March 31, 1997

No. 96-1327.

#### Baskin *v.*Bath Township Board of Zoning Appeals et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1792 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1792

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2012

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To clarify the authority of the United States Marshal Service to assist 
    other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies in the 
  investigation of cases involving sex offenders and missing children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Investigations of Sex 
Offenders and Missing Children Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 566(e)(1)(B) of title 28, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
                    ``(B) as directed by the Attorney General, 
                investigate--
                            ``(i) fugitive matters, both within and 
                        outside the United States; and
                            ``(ii) at the request of another Federal, 
                        State, or local law enforcement agency, cases 
                        involving--
                                    ``(I) a sex offender (as defined in 
                                section 111 of the Sex Offender 
                                Registration and Notification Act (42 
                                U.S.C. 16911)) who violates a sex 
                                offender registration requirement; or
                                    ``(II) a missing child.''.

            Passed the Senate December 17, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002







In connection
with the Quarterly Report of nFinanSe Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended April 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry R. Welch, in my capacity
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
      Jerry R. WelchDate:  
      May 13, 2010
            Jerry
      R. Welch
              Chief
      Executive Officer and Director
Form of Coverage Letter



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Form of Coverage Letter 
 under the Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. Executive Retention Plan

 [Letterhead of Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc.] 
 [date]  
 _________________ 
 _________________ 
 _________________ 
  

	 	Re:	Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. Executive Retention Plan 

 Dear
______________: 
 I am writing to inform you that Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. (formerly named Pemco Aviation Group, Inc.) has adopted
the Alabama Aircraft Industries, Inc. Executive Retention Plan effective as of January 21, 2008 (the “Plan”). Enclosed for your review is a copy of the Plan. The Plan governs your eligibility for Plan payments and benefits, and I
encourage you to read it carefully. 
 This letter is your “Coverage Letter” for Plan purposes, and it confirms that you are
covered by the Plan as an “Eligible Employee” (see Section 2(e)-(f) of the Plan). Your “Participation Period” will be the 365-day period that immediately follows your “Termination Date” (see Sections 2(k) and
2(o)-(p) of the Plan). If you become eligible for Plan benefits, (1) you will receive payment of your “Base Salary” during the Participation Period through the active employee payroll processing system (see Sections 2(b), 3 and
4(a) of the Plan), and (2) you will receive a post-tax lump sum equal to your COBRA premiums for your entire Participation Period (see Section 4(b) of the Plan), but only to the extent that group health insurance is provided through a
self-insured arrangement. 
 In addition to meeting other benefit eligibility requirements specified by the Plan, you must experience a
“Termination” on or before December 31, 2008 and be a “Participant” in order to receive any Plan benefits (see Sections 2(j) and 2(o) of the Plan). The Plan automatically will terminate upon the later of (1) 11:59:59
p.m. on December 31, 2008 or (2) the date as of which all benefits due to be provided under the Plan have been provided. 
 The
Plan has been made available to you in recognition of the key role that you play during this important period, the importance of your contributions to our financial success, and the significant work that lies ahead. Please keep this letter
confidential, as not all employees are eligible to participate in the Plan. Feel free to contact me with any questions. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	 
	Ronald A. Aramini, President
	and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Rose M. Robeson, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     /s/ Rose M. Robeson
-------------------------------------------
Rose M. Robeson
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 10, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-88918, 333-65912, 333-76633, 333-76635, 333-75763, 33-56693, 33-69840, and
33-31556 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 20, 2003, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Smith International, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (i) the
adoption of a new accounting principle and (ii) the application of procedures
relating to certain other revisions and disclosures of financial statement
amounts related to the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements that were
audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have
expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than with respect to such
revisions and disclosures) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Smith
International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston, Texas
March 24, 2003
Exhibit 23.1 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement of International Smart Sourcing, Inc. on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-48701) of our report dated January 23, 2009 with respect
to our audits of the financial statements of International Smart Sourcing, Inc.
as of December 31, 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December
31, 2007, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
International Smart Sourcing, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2008.

| | /s/ Marcum & Kliegman
      LLP
| | -------------------------------
| | Marcum &
      Kliegman LLP    
| | New York,
      NY             
| | January 23,
      2009         

---
# C_2015107EN.01000801.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Stanley International Betting Ltd, Stanleybet Malta Ltd v Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli di Stato

(Case C-463/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Betting and gambling - National rules - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences with a period of validity shorter than that of previous licences - Restriction - Overriding reasons in the public interest - Proportionality))

(2015/C 107/09)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Stanley International Betting Ltd, Stanleybet Malta Ltd

Defendants: Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli di Stato

Intervening parties: Intralot Italia SpA, SNAI SpA, Galassia Game Srl, Eurobet Italia Srl unipersonale, Lottomatica Scommesse Srl, Sisal Match Point SpA, Cogetech Gaming Srl

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings which provides for the organisation of a fresh call for tenders for the award of licences with a period of validity shorter than that of licences awarded previously because of the reorganisation of the system by way of an alignment of licence expiry dates.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.

---
# C_2014421EN.01001701.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 September 2014 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vergabekammer Arnsberg — Germany) — Bundesdruckerei GmbH v Stadt Dortmund

(Case C-549/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Directive 96/71/EC - Procedures for the award of public service contracts - National legislation requiring tenderers and their subcontractors to undertake to pay a minimum wage to staff performing the services relating to the public contract - Subcontractor established in another Member State))

2014/C 421/23

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Vergabekammer Arnsberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bundesdruckerei GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Stadt Dortmund

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

In a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which a tenderer intends to carry out a public contract by having recourse exclusively to workers employed by a subcontractor established in a Member State other than that to which the contracting authority belongs, Article 56 TFEU precludes the application of legislation of the Member State to which that contracting authority belongs which requires that subcontractor to pay those workers a minimum wage fixed by that legislation.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
No. 54378.

#### Armour & Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 146117-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 49456.

#### Protests 965507-G, etc., of Aoki Taiseido Book Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the books, assessed as books for children’s use, are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Aoki Taiseido Book Co.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 217, C. D. 757), and those assessed as fashion magazines or lithographs were stipulated to be the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Aoki Taiseido Book Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 467). In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as to both of these items.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2137 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2137

To prohibit the issuance of a waiver for commissioning or enlistment in 
   the Armed Forces for any individual convicted of a felony sexual 
                                offense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2012

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the issuance of a waiver for commissioning or enlistment in 
   the Armed Forces for any individual convicted of a felony sexual 
                                offense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON WAIVER FOR COMMISSIONING OR ENLISTMENT IN THE 
              ARMED FORCES FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL CONVICTED OF A FELONY 
              SEXUAL OFFENSE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) In fiscal year 2011 alone, 3,191 incidents of sexual 
        assault--including rape--were reported in the military.
            (2) In fiscal year 2010, an additional 3,158 such incidents 
        were reported.
            (3) According to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, these 
        figures may significantly underestimate the actual number of 
        sexual assaults.
            (4) According to Secretary Panetta, the actual number of 
        sexual assaults may be closer to 19,000 annually.
            (5) According to the Army, the number of violent sexual 
        assaults committed by members of the Army rose by 90 percent 
        between 2006 and 2011.
            (6) According to Secretary Panetta, the men and women of 
        the Armed Forces ``are willing to fight and die to protect and 
        serve our country--they deserve better protection. Their 
        families and dependents also sacrifice and serve. And so for 
        this reason, we must spare no effort to protect them against 
        this heinous crime. . . . One sexual assault is one too 
        many.''.
            (7) Every effort must be made to bring the epidemic of 
        sexual assaults within the Armed Forces to an end.
    (b) Prohibition.--An individual may not be provided a waiver for 
commissioning or enlistment in the Armed Forces if the individual has 
been convicted under Federal or State law of a felony offense of any of 
the following:
            (1) Rape.
            (2) Sexual abuse.
            (3) Sexual assault.
            (4) Incest.
            (5) Any other sexual offense.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 28.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Chase Manhattan Owner Trust 1998-B

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


      The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan Bank
USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of December 1, 1996 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by
and between Chase USA and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as
trustee (the "Trustee"), does hereby certify that:

1.         A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
      January 1, 1999 until December 31, 1999 was conducted under my
      supervision.

2.         Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
      fully performed in all material respects all its obligations, under the
      Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no material
      default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is
      continuing except as set forth in paragraph 3 below.

3.         None.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 15th day of March 2000.

                                          /s/Keith Schuck
                                          ---------------
                                          Keith Schuck
                                          Vice President