alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Nutra Pharma Corp., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rik Deitsch, the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: December 3, 2012                             | 
|--------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                    | 
|/s/ Rik J. Deitsch                                  | 
|Rik J. Deitsch                                      | 
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Intellon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian T.
McGee, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Brian T. McGee                               
|                     |  |  |  | Brian T. McGee                                   
|                     |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. D-1737.

#### In re Disbarment of Gill.

LeRoi Lionel Gill, of New York, N. Y., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 20th SFS meeting supply, demand 

By Senior Airman Christopher Maldonado20th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

                SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Shaw Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Shaw Air Force Base20th Security Forces Squadronsuppliesequipmentvehicles
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Barry
G. Steele, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
             of the Company.


    /s/ Barry G. Steele
---------------------------
Barry G. Steele
Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2003
Before the First Division,

January 23, 1941

No. 45245.

#### Petition 6116-R of Ferdinand Rice (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

On. reappraisement the single judge sustained the importer’s entered value which was reversed on appeal to the division. It was shown that there was ample ground for dispute as to the correct value and that there was no intention on the part of the importer to deceive the Government. The petition was therefore granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1










CoStar Group, Inc.


1331 L Street, NW


Washington, DC 20005





February 24, 2011





Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, NE


Washington, DC  20549





Re:  Certification Of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350





Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoStar Group, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2010, I, Andrew C. Florance, Chief Executive Officer of CoStar Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoStar Group, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o (d)); and





2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoStar Group, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CoStar Group, Inc.





By:
/s/ Andrew C. FloranceAndrew C. FloranceChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer andDuly Authorized Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CoStar Group, Inc. and will be retained by CoStar Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





In accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to CoStar Group, Inc.’s annual report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
Before the Third Division,

December 12, 1950

No. 54968.

#### Keystone Tanning & Glue Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 129789-K (C), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries, and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are-similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RP07-357-001 and CP05-92-004]


Liberty Gas Storage, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 9, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 7, 2007, Liberty Gas Storage LLC (Liberty) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 
1, the following revised tariff sheets:

First Revised Sheet No. 149
First Revised Sheet No. 154
First Revised Sheet No. 155

    Liberty states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with an 
order issued by the Commission on April 13, 2007 in the above-
referenced dockets.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#42040710010d2c2e2b2c27113732322d303602242730216c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c3858691808cadafaaada690b6b3b3acb1b783a5a6b1a0eda4acb5">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-9358 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Dinara Nussipakynova,  P.Geo.


AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Limited,


Suite 1330, 200 Granville Street,


Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1S4,














To the Board of Directors of Rubicon Minerals Corporation








I, Dinara Nussipakynova, hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 of the technical report entitled “F2 Gold System - Phoenix Gold Project Bateman Township Red Lake, Canada Technical Report” dated effective August 8th 2011 (the “Technical Report”) and to extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report in the written disclosure contained in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the financial year ended December 31, 2011 (the “AIF”), dated March 27, 2011.






Dated as of this 27th day of March 2012






Original signed by




“Dinara Nussipakynova”






Dinara Nussipakynova, P.Geo.


Senior Geologist,


AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Limited
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00170-CR

WILLIAM CHARLES WEBB,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-678-C2

ORDER

On July 12, 2018, we received the following three motions from Appellant William 

Charles Webb: “Appellant, William Charles Webb’s, Motion for Rehearing,” 

“Appellant’s Motion Requesting the Clerk’s Record,” and “Appellant’s Second Motion 

Requesting Appointment of Counsel.” None of the motions contains proper proof of 

service as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5.

We have previously invoked Rule 2 in this appeal to suspend Rule 9.5’s proof-ofservice requirement for Appellant’s first motion for the appointment of counsel, and we 
Webb v. State Page 2

forwarded Appellant’s first motion for the appointment of counsel to the attorney of 

record for the State. However, the Clerk of the Court notified Appellant by letter dated 

June 7, 2018, that “[n]o other service will be undertaken as an accommodation by this 

Court.”

Accordingly, “Appellant, William Charles Webb’s, Motion for Rehearing,” 

“Appellant’s Motion Requesting the Clerk’s Record,” and “Appellant’s Second Motion 

Requesting Appointment of Counsel” are stricken. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k).

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed August 15, 2018
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Amendment No. 1 to Form

10-QSB of Futomic Industries, Inc. for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, I,
Ken Tetterington, Chief Financial Officer of Futomic Industries, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:


     1.   Such quarterly report of Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-QSB for the period
          ending September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Amendment No. 1
          to Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly
          represents in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of Futomic Industries, Inc.


Dated:    November 22, 2004

FUTOMIC INDUSTRIES, INC.

By:  /s/ Ken Tetterington
-----------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
September 12, 1939

No. 42090.

Suit 4187.

#### United *States*v. *International Forwarding Co., Inc., a/c Ozalid*Corp.

Reap. Dec. 4292 reversed and cause remanded to single judge for dismissal.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Stitching pride into the mission 

By Staff Sgt. Justin Norton302nd Airlift Wing Public Affairs

                PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo.   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 302nd Airlift Wing website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

302nd Airlift Wing302nd Operations Support Groupaircrew flight equipmentAir Force ReserveAir Force Reserve Commandmaintenanceinspectionrepair
(Reap. Dec. 9889)

#### The American International Products Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 1250, etc.

(Decided December 29, 1960)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise the subject of the above entitled appeals to reappraisement is properly dutiable on the basis of American Selling Price as defined in Section 402 (g) Tariff Act of 1930 as amended and that the said American Selling Price was as follows for the export periods indicated.

> Item Period Price

> Pas sodium 1959-1960 $1.75 per Lb. less

> 1% net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question, and that such value for the involved item during the period of exportation heretofore indicated was as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission herein.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LAZZO MARTIN,

Appellant,

v.

VIVIAN SUAREZ,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2766

[March 10, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502019CA011544XXXXMB.

Robert O. Gonzalez of Robert O. Gonzalez, PLLC, Lake Worth, for 

appellant.

Joel H. Feldman of Johnson, Ritchey & Feldman, P.A., Boca Raton, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2012287EN.01003901.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/39

---

Action brought on 1 August 2012 — Leiner v OHIM — Recaro (REVARO)

(Case T-349/12)

2012/C 287/70

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rudolf Leiner GmbH (Sankt Pölten, Austria) (represented by: W. Emberger, I. Rudnay and L. Emberger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH (Kaiserslautern, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 May 2012 in Case R 482/2011-1 so as to allow the appeal or, alternatively, annul the decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 May 2012 in Case R 482/2011-1 so as to allow the appeal or, alternatively, annul the decision;

| — | order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Rudolf Leiner GmbH

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘REVARO’, for goods in Classes 11, 20 and 24

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: International registration ‘RECARO’ for goods in Classes 10, 12, 14, 20, 25 and 28

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition allowed

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---