alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Worthing F. Jackman, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A
of Waste Connections, Inc.; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 28, 2016 |                             
|-------------------- | ----------------------------
|                     | /s/ Worthing F. Jackman     
|                     | Worthing F. Jackman         
|                     | Executive Vice President and
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim
W. Mogg, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


/s/        Jim W. Mogg
------------------------------------

Jim W. Mogg
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
No. 48843.

#### Protests 90875-K, etc., of Leval & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the correct number of bushels was as shown on schedule exhibit A attached to the decision in this case. The collector was directed to reliquidate accordingly.
#### Margaret Flynn, as Administratrix of the Estate of James R. Flynn, Deceased, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant. Raili M. Luostarinen, as Administratrix of the Estate of Arthur Luostarinen, Deceased, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 39423.)

(Claim No. 39424.)

Court of Claims,

March 2, 1966.

*Harry H. Lipsig*and *Marvin Luboff*for claimants. *Barry, Treanor, Shandell & Zachary (Edward A. Shandell*of counsel), for defendant.

Alexander Del Giorno, J.

The administratrices herein brought suit against the State for the wrongful death of their husbands while they were employed by a subcontractor doing work on the Cross-Bronx Expressway on August 11,1959. They also sued the subcontractor. A verdict was rendered in their faVor against the contractor, but it was reversed and the complaint dismissed by the Appellate Division, whose action was sustained by the Court of Appeals. In the present motion the administratrices desire to examine the State of New York in regard to the aforesaid contract and, also, the State’s contractual obligations to the Federal Government. It is stated in the supporting affidavit, upon information and belief, that the State was required by Federal law and a contract with the Federal Government to provide supervision of safety features and proper work practices during the said construction.

The State has interposed an affidavit indicating its opposition on the ground that the claimants have already had an examina*418tion before trial. During the arguments on the motion, the claimants conceded that they had an examination before trial but stated that it was not sufficient or conclusive and that it was necessary for them to examine the contract between the State and the Federal Government.

The motion is denied on the ground that the Federal Government is a financial participant in the work prepared for, undertaken, given out for bid, and carried out by the State, and that the State, as a sovereign, applies its own laws, rules and regulations for the proper carrying out of a contract, including the safety of those engaged in the work thereon. The Federal Government, is not a direct participant in said contract.

Should the claimants feel that they need further examination of either the contract, the records, or persons representing the State, they may renew their application to the court for further examination before trial along these lines. Upon such application, the court will determine whether or not the prior examination was complete and satisfactory or whether the claimants are entitled to explore further for necessary information to help them prepare their case.
1

Whalen, Marilyn

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:22 PM

To: roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov; Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.hawaii.gov)

Cc: Shimabuku, June T. CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Kishaba, Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; 

Lovgren, Andrew C LT NAVSUP, 700; Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; 

Nakamura, Peter M CIV NAVFAC HI, EV1; steven.chang@doh.hawaii.gov; 

stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; Linder, Steven; Pallarino, Bob

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - AUGUST 12, 2014

Importance: High

Hi Richard/Roxanne:

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of August 12, 2014.  In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be

annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan  

a. Item 1‐ Models to estimate downward vertical migration of free product.

b. Item 2 ‐ Methods or options for non‐invasive scanning of basalt to determine area and volume of contaminant

mass prior to any drilling investigation.  Action complete.   

c. Item 3 ‐ Methods and locations for borings to most efficiently characterize the extent of contamination.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1 ‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation

of release point(s) within Tank 5.

b. Action 2  ‐ No change.  

c. Action 3 ‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP‐8 free product.  Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.   

d. Action 4 ‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex.  This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.  

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.

The Navy will submit the Final Work Plan for Installation of Two Sentinel Wells the week of 11 August 2014.

The Draft Site Characterization Work Plan/ Sampling and Analysis Plan...

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Vr,

Aaron
UNITED STATES
                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          Washington, D.C.  20549

                              Form 10-QSB/A-1

(Mark One)
     [X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
          SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

     For the quarter ended June 30, 2003

     [ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
          SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

     For the transition period from ________ to __________

                      Commission File Number: 0-30874

                               Caneum, Inc.
            (Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)

Nevada                             33-0916900
State or other jurisdiction of     I.R.S. Employer I.D. No.
incorporation or organization

170 Newport Center Drive, Suite 220, Newport Beach, CA      92660
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number, including area code:  (949) 273-4000

Check whether the Issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such fling requirements for the past 90 days.
(1) Yes [X] No [ ]   (2) Yes [X] No [ ]

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer's classes of
common equity as of the latest practicable date:  At August 11, 2003, there
were 2,960,000 shares of our common stock outstanding.

<PAGE>

                             EXPLANATORY NOTE

     This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A-1 ("Form 10-QSB/A-1") is being
filed to revise the certifications in regard to controls and procedures in
the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003, which was filed with the S.E.C. on August 14, 2003.
Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, only Item 6 of Part II and Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are
included in this amendment.

                                  PART II

                 Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

     (a)  Exhibits.


     31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Principal Executive Officer

     31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Principal Financial Officer


     (b)  Reports on Form 8-K:  No reports on Form 8-K were filed during
the second quarter ended June 30, 2003.


                               SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                   Caneum, Inc.

Date:  December 23, 2003           By /s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan
                                   Sukhbir Singh Mudan, President and
                                   Treasurer (Principal executive officer,
                                   principal financial officer, and chief
                                   accounting officer)



                                     2
Eric: 

You are correct, the containers with the acetone rinse need to be quantitatively transferred to pre weighed 

beakers for evaporation and desiccation prior to weighing. Probably the paragraph should read like procedure 

11.2.4 or at least be more thorough and clear on the treatment of these containers. 

Thanks for the question. As you may know, OTM and the proposed Method 201A are identical. Any clarifications 

that we can make to Method 201A will help to reduce questions like this after the method is promulgated. Also, 

since we are requiring this method in the recent ICR's for emissions testing that the Agency sent, this would help

in clarifying this method for those testing programs. 

_________________________________

Ron Myers 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policy and Programs Division 

Monitoring Policy Group, D243-05 

RTP NC 27711 

Tel. 919.541.5407 

Fax 919.541.1039 

E-mail myers.ron@epa.gov 

Hi Eric, 

I'm forwarding this message to Ron Myers who is the contact person for OTM-27. 

Gary 

----- Forwarded by Gary McAlister/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/08/2009 02:08 PM ----- 

Gary, 

Hey, 

I've got a question on EPA OTM-27 which is fairly new and was wondering if 

you knew who I should address it to? 

We're getting some samples in today and just read the method.. 

From: Gary McAlister/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Ron Myers/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: egrosjean@aaclab.com

Date: 07/08/2009 02:10 PM

Subject: Fw: EAP OTM-27

From: "Eric Grosjean" <egrosjean@aaclab.com>

To: Gary McAlister/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/08/2009 11:14 AM

Subject: EAP OTM-27

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C7524B3Do... 8/25/2010
My question is in the analytical procedures 11.2.2 and 11.2.3 the method 

says to treat containers 2 and 3 like container 1.The problem is that 

container 1 is just the PM2.5 filter which we dessicate and weigh while 

containers 2 and 3 contain the particulate material from the cyclones plus 

acetone....We would assume that the correct procedure is to transfer the 

contents of containers 2 and 3 into pre-weighed beakers , evaporate the 

acetone, dessicate and weigh similiar to the procedures for container #4. 

I'd appreciate it if you could let me know if either you or someone else can 

answer this question? 

Thanks! 

Eric 

Eric Grosjean 

Project Manager 

Atmospheric Analysis & Consulting, Inc.

1534 Eastman Ave. Suite A 

Ventura, CA 93003 

Phone: 805-650-1642 

Fax: 805-650-1644 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C7524B3Do... 8/25/2010
No. 96-6373 (A-281).

#### Bush *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamosa Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Sharbutt, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.






August 14, 2002                             /s/ David Sharbutt
---------------                             -----------------------
Date                                        David Sharbutt
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2014129EN.01000601.xml

| 28.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia (Italy)) — Cruciano Siragusa v Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo

(Case C-206/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - General principles of EU law - Implementation of EU law - Scope of EU law - A sufficient connection - Lack of such a connection - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2014/C 129/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cruciano Siragusa

Defendant: Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia — Interpretation of Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Principle of proportionality — National legislation under which any alterations made by the owner to property in an area of scenic interest are conditional upon prior clearance being granted — Obligation, in the absence of such clearance, to demolish the building, even where the owner shows afterwards that the alteration has no adverse effect on the scenery or landscape.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia (Italy).

---

(1)  
  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION


I, Craig Burton, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of USIP.Com, Inc.;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:


a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May  9, 2005

                                s/s Craig Burton
                                    Craig Burton, President
No. 44307.

#### Protest 3480-K of Ernest W. C. Toepfer (New York).

Opinion b3r

Dallinger, J.

Tape measures stipulated to be like those the subject of Abstract 43372 were hela dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

Certification of CEO and CFO Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Eugene Boyle, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | Date: April 14, 2008By: /s/ Eugene Boyle--------------------------------------Title: Chief Financial Officer,Chief Operations Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit 23.2**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69951, 333-90635 and 333-39460) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87749 and 333-32342) of Answerthink, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2005, except for the effect ofthe restatement described in Note 1 included in the 2005 Form 10-K/A (not separately presented herein), which is as of February 15, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in the Annual Reportto Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Miami, Florida 

March 13, 2007
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ixia Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
    
    February 23, 2007
    
    /s/Errol GinsbergErrol GinsbergPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    February 23, 2007
    
    /s/Thomas B. MillerThomas B. MillerChief Financial Officer
 39