alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10017]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (08-043)]

NASA Advisory Council; Science Committee; Earth Science 
Subcommittee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 
announces a meeting of the Earth Science Subcommittee of the NASA 
Advisory Council (NAC). This Subcommittee reports to the Science 
Committee of the NAC. The Meeting will be held for the purpose of 
soliciting from the scientific community and other persons scientific 
and technical information relevant to program planning.

DATES: Wednesday, May 28, 2008, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Thursday, May 
29, 2008, 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, Room 6H45 and Room 5H45 consecutively, 
300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marian Norris, Science Mission 
Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-4452, 
fax (202) 358-4118, or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:
     Earth Science Division Update
     Implications of the fiscal year 2009 Budget for 
Implementing the Decadal Survey
     Role and Sequencing of Venture-Class Missions as Part of 
Earth Science Division's Portfolio

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate 
the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Attendees will be 
requested to sign a register and to comply with NASA security 
requirements, including the presentation of a valid picture ID, before 
receiving an access badge. Foreign nationals attending this meeting 
will be required to provide the following information no less than 6 
working days prior to the meeting: Full name; gender; date/place of 
birth; citizenship; visa/green card information (number, type, 
expiration date); passport information (number, country, expiration 
date); employer/affiliation information (name of institution, address, 
country, telephone); title/position of attendee. To expedite 
admittance, attendees with U.S. citizenship can provide identifying 
information 3 working days in advance by contacting Marian Norris via 
e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (202) 358-4452.

    Dated: April 30, 3008.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
 [FR Doc. E8-10017 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
```
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global-Tech Appliance Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C.K. Sham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    John C.K. ShamJohn C.K. Sham President and Chief Executive Officer Date: September 29, 2006
Exhibit 31.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,  Dr.  Oliver  Wiedow,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form 10-KSB of Proteo, Inc. And
Subsidiaries;

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report;

4.  I  am  responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant  and  have:

a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and procedures to ensure that material
information  relating  to  the  registrant  is made known to me by others within
those  entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report is
being  prepared;

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based on my evaluation on such evaluation
Date;

d)  disclosed  in  this  report any changes in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent
fiscal  quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to affect,
the  registrant's  internal  control  over  financial  reporting;

5.  I  have  disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors  and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing  the  equivalent  functions):

a)  all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or
operation  of  internal  controls  over financial reporting which are reasonable
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize  and  report  information;  and

b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial  reporting.



Date:  April  14,  2004                            By:  /s/  Oliver  Wiedow
                                                    ------------------------
                                                Professor  Dr.  Oliver  Wiedow
                                                Principal  Executive  Officer
#### Richard Laupot, Respondent, *v.*Florence M. O’Neill, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

March 10, 1966.

*1044
      *Martin N. McCarthy*for appellant. *Jerome H. BerJcowits*for respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. No opinion.

Concur- — • Tilzee, J. P., Hofstadteb and Gold, JJ.

Order affirmed, etc.
# C_2014112EN.01003301.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/33

---

Order of the General Court of 6 February 2014 — Duff Beer v OHIM — Twentieth Century Fox Film (Duff)

(Case T-87/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 112/43

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Duff Beer UG (haftungsbeschränkt) (Eschwege, Germany) (represented by: N. Schindler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: S. Böttger and M. Koch, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 December 2011 (Case R 456/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Duff Beer UG (haftungsbeschränkt).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall each bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1856 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1856

    To prohibit Federal funding for lawsuits seeking to invalidate 
     specified State laws that support the enforcement of Federal 
                           immigration laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 2011

 Mr. DeMint (for himself, Mr. Sessions, and Mr. Vitter) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit Federal funding for lawsuits seeking to invalidate 
     specified State laws that support the enforcement of Federal 
                           immigration laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL FUNDING FOR LAWSUITS SEEKING TO INVALIDATE STATE 
              IMMIGRATION LAWS.

    Federal funds may not be used by any agency or instrumentality of 
the Federal Government to participate in any lawsuit that seeks to 
overturn, enjoin, or in any other way invalidate--
            (1) Oklahoma Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act of 2007 
        (HB 1804), which became effective on November 1, 2007;
            (2) Missouri House Bill 390, First Regular Session 2009, 
        9th General Assembly, which became effective on August 28, 
        2009;
            (3) the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods 
        Act (SB 1070), which was signed into law in Arizona on April 
        23, 2010;
            (4) The Illegal Immigration Enforcement Act (HB 497), which 
        was signed into law in Utah on March 15, 2011;
            (5) Indiana Senate Enrolled Act No. 590, First Regular 
        Session, 117th General Assembly (2011), which was signed into 
        law on May 10, 2011;
            (6) the Beason-Hammon Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen 
        Protection Act (HB 56), which was passed by the Alabama State 
        legislature on June 9, 2011;
            (7) South Carolina Act No. 69 (SB 20), which was signed 
        into law on June 27, 2011;
            (8) the Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 
        2011 (HB 87), which became effective in the State of Georgia on 
        July 1, 2011; or
            (9) an Act to amend the Indiana Code concerning education 
        (HB 1402), which became effective in the State of Indiana on 
        July 1, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE

UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Global-Tech Appliance Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kin Shek Leung, Acting
Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Kin Shek LeungKin Shek LeungActing Chief Financial OfficerDate: September 30, 2004
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS



I, Mario Drolet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report of Millennium Capital Venture Holdings, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amended quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

- designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others within the registrant, particularly during the period in which the amended quarterly report is being prepared;

- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this amended quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

- presented in this amended quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation of the Evaluation Date.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:

- all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

- Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6. I have indicated in this amended quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: December 19, 2003 | By: /s/ Mario DroletName: Mario DroletTitle: President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2013086EN.01000902.xml

| 23.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 27 December 2012 — HN v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and the Attorney General

(Case C-604/12)

2013/C 86/14

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: HN

Applicant:

Defendants: Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland and the Attorney General

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1), interpreted in the light of the principle of good administration in the law of the European Union and, in particular, as provided by Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, permit a Member State, to provide in its law that an application for subsidiary protection status can be considered only if the applicant has applied for and been refused refugee status in accordance with national law?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted

1

OJ L 304, p. 2

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# The Operational Camouflage Pattern uniform has arrived at Aviano Air Base

By Staff Sgt. Tory Cusimano31st Fighter Wing Public Affairs

                AVIANO AIR BASE, Italy  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Aviano Air Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Aviano Air Baseuniforms
Exhibit 31.1

            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Brett D. Mayer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bingham Canyon
Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                                 /s/ Brett D. Mayer
Date: May 11, 2005              ___________________________________________
                                Brett D. Mayer, Principal Executive Officer