alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Brett D. Mayer, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bingham Canyon
Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                              /s/ Brett D. Mayer
Date: May 10, 2004            ___________________________________________
                              Brett D. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer
(Reap. Dec. 9905)

#### Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 2336.

(Decided January 25, 1961)

*Barnes, Richardson & Coll)urn*for the plaintiff.

*George 8. Leonard,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the instant appeal for reappraisement is limited to 1,000 cartons canned corned beef “Peter Pan” packed 24 tins per ease each tin containing 12 ozs.

> That the said merchandise was exported from Argentina.

> That at the time of exportation to the United States, such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Argentina, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at $2.5070 per dozen tins, packing included.

> That the appeal for reappraisement is abandoned as to all merchandise other than that hereinbefore referred to and that the instant appeal for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export *577value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is $2.5070 per dozen tins, packing included. As to all other merchandise covered by the invoices included in the entry in question, the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                             TO THE
                  CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                               OF
                         GAVELLA CORP.

GAVELLA   CORP.,  organized  and  existing  under   the   General
Corporation Laws of the State of Delaware (the Corporation), does
hereby certify:

     FIRST:  That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, at a
meeting called for such purpose, duly adopted resolutions setting
forth  the proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
of the Corporation and calling for the submission of the proposed
amendment  to a vote of the stockholders of the Corporation,  for
their  approval and adoption.  The resolution setting  forth  the
proposed amendment is as follows:

          RESOLVED, that the Corporation amend its certificate of
incorporation so that:

          ARTICLE  4  of  the certificate of incorporation  shall
read as follows:

          4.   The  total number of shares of common stock  which
the  corporation shall have authority to issue is Fifteen Million
(15,000,000), and the par value of each of such shares is  $.001,
amounting   in   the   aggregate  to  Fifteen  Thousand   Dollars
($15,000.00).

     SECOND:   That the holders of a majority of the  outstanding
shares  of  common stock of the Corporation did duly  adopt  said
amendment  proposed  by  the Board of Directors,  at  the  annual
meeting of shareholders held on June 30, 2004.

     THIRD:   These  amendments were duly adopted  in  accordance
with  the  provisions  of  Section 242 of  the  Delaware  General
Corporation Laws.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused its corporate
seal to be affixed hereto and this Certificate to be executed  by
its  President and attested by its Secretary, this  30th  day  of
June, 2004.


GAVELLA CORP.

By:  Harry  J. Santoro, President


Attest:   Stephen M. Robinson,  Secretary
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**STATEMENT
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Winston Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd.
      (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30, 2007, to which this certification accompanies (the "Annual Report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November
                14, 2007
            
            /s/
                Winston JohnsonWinston
              Johnson, Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer)
EXHIBIT 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.333-10932) pertaining to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. (the Company) of our report dated September 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company
included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended March 31, 2008.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young 
|Hong Kong         
|September 26, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jim W. Mogg certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Duke Energy Field
Services, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 12, 2003


                                      /s/ Jim W. Mogg
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Jim W. Mogg
                                      Chairman of the Board, President
                                      and Chief Executive Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Lisa Davis v. Dalayna Smith

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00806

- CV

Trial court case number: PR

- 0074876A

Trial court: Probate Court of Galveston County

The record in this appeal was originally due on October 27, 2014. The clerk’s record was filed on November 13, 2014, but the reporter’s record has not been filed. On October 10, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the court reporter res ponsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed the Court that appellant had not (1) requested a reporter’s record or (2) paid, or made arrangements to pay, for the reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 35.3(b). The Clerk further notified ap pellant that unless she provided written evidence that she has paid, or made arrangements to pay, for the reporter’s record, or provided proof that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs by November 10, 2014, the Court might consider the appea l without a reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P 37.3(c). Appellant failed to respond to

the notice. Although the docketing statement filed by appellant on October 14, 2014 states that she requested the reporter’s record and made arrangements to pay for t he record, the court reporter filed an information sheet informing the Court that appellant’s docketing statement is incorrect and that appellant has neither requested nor paid for the reporter’s record.

Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide tho se issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id . Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a). Given the delay caused by appellant, no extensions will be g ranted absent extraordinary circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 26, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
C. Robinson, CEO, Chairman and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                               CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                               By: /s/ William C. Robinson
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   William C. Robinson
                                                   CEO, President, Chairman and
                                                   Principal Executive Officer

                                                   August 21, 2006
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 11, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 11, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0143. MSC PROPERTIES, LLC et al. v. ASHLEY PADEN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

20A540
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1758 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1758

 To amend the Federal Power Act prohibit the Federal Energy Regulatory 
   Commission from requiring the removal or modification of existing 
       structures or encroachments in licenses of the Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 20, 2011

  Mrs. McCaskill (for herself and Mr. Blunt) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Power Act prohibit the Federal Energy Regulatory 
   Commission from requiring the removal or modification of existing 
       structures or encroachments in licenses of the Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Landowner Protection Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
797(e)) is amended--
            (1) by designating the first, second, and third sentences 
        as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Removal or modification of existing nonconforming 
        structures or encroachments.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (B), in issuing, denying, approving, or 
                modifying a shoreline management plan required under 
                any license issued under this part for any project, the 
                Commission shall not require the removal or 
                modification of any existing nonconforming structure or 
                encroachment within the project boundary.
                    ``(B) Exception.--Subparagraph (A) shall not apply 
                to any existing nonconforming structure or encroachment 
                built within the project boundary in bad faith.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 1, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.4

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-

OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Diane M. Morefield, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: February 27, 2012
|                       
|/s/ Diane M. Morefield 
|Diane M. Morefield     
|Chief Financial Officer
No. 47086.

#### Protests 820095-G, etc., of Otto Baer et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology,
      Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of, I, Jing’an Wang, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 18, 2008




/S/
                Jing’an WangJing’an
                Wang
              Chief
                Executive Officer
#### The State of Kansas, *ex rel. E. L. Tustin, as County Attorney, etc.,*v. The City of Grainfield.

No. 15,906.

City *Warrants*— Injunction—Grounds. Judgment affirmed refusing an injunction against city warrants on technical grounds.

Error from Gove district court; Jacob C. Ruppenthal, judge.

Opinion filed July 3, 1909.

Affirmed.

*Fred S. Jackson,*attorney-general, *E. L. Tustin,*and *A. D. Gilkeson,*for The State.

*Burch & Litowich,*and *R. B. Chambers,*for the defendant in error. _ ,

*Per Curiam:*

A temporary injunction was obtained against the officers of the city of Grainfield to enjoin them from contracting debts, issuing scrip and paying outstanding scrip. There were involved twenty-eight claims against the city upon which warrants had been issued. Some of them were challenged because the claims were not verified and presented in proper form, the ordinances appropriating money to pay the scrip had not been passed and funds had not been set apart for their payment, and the warrants had been issued for claims that were illegal. The trial court examined the claims and warrants in detail. One of them was perpetually enjoined because no fund for its payment had been provided. The temporary injunction was dissolved as to three of the claims, and the remaining twenty-four were found to be just claims against the city, but because they had not been properly presented the injunction was continued in force against them, the court holding that these claims might be paid in case they were afterward properly verified and presented, and regularly allowed. The claims and the questions arising on them appear to have been carefully examined and the rights of the public as well as' the *694claimants justly determined. It is an injunction proceeding, in which equitable considerations outweigh mere technical objections. In the state in which we find the evidence it can not be said that a wrong result was reached.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 23 - Consent of Experts


G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
---------------------------
Certified Public Accountant

                                                         330 E. Warm Springs
                                                        Las Vegas, NV  89119
                                                                702.528.1984
                                                         425.928.2877 (efax)


October 30, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report
of October 30, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Foxy Jewelry, Inc. for
the nine months ending September 30, 2001, in any filings which are
necessary now or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and
Exchange Commission.

Signed,

/s/ G. Brad Beckstead
-----------------------
G. Brad Beckstead, CPA


<PAGE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Interfaces for PersonalIdentity Verification [electronic resource]**
 
Parts: 01020304
 
SuDoc Number:C 13.10:800-73-3/DRAFT/2009/V.1-4
Item Number:0247 (online)
CGP systemNumber:0247 (online)
 
January 9, 2020