alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JUDE ANN PRISCO a/k/a JUDE

- ANN PRISCO

a nd SALVATORE PRISCO , Appellant s ,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 3477

[ February 9, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Richard L. Oftedal , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CA

013772

- XXXX

- MB

.
Stuart J. Zoberg of Shir Law Group, P.A.

, Boca Raton, for appellant s

.

Albert A. Zakarian of Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP

, Atlanta, Georgia , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN , G ERBER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1


                     WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada certifies
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:  August 2, 2004

                                    /s/ Donald R. Mayer
                                  _________________________________________
                                  Donald R. Mayer
                                  Principal Executive and Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2015

a1019

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2015

148643

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148643

COA: 318792

Wayne CC: 13-001296-FC

DAVINA CORAN MOSBY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of July 29, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

July 29, 2015, 498 Mich 358 (2015), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
# C_2012200EN.01002202.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/22

---

Action brought on 7 May 2012 — ZZ and Others v European Economic and Social Committee

(Case F-53/12)

2012/C 200/46

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Partial annulment of the decision of the European Economic and Social Committee to promote the applicants from grade AST 5 to grade AST 6, in the part fixing the multiplication factor.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions of 20 July 2011 of the Deputy Secretary General, General Affairs, Human Resources and Internal Affairs, in so far as the multiplication factor resulting from the applicants’ promotion to grade AST 6/1 with effect from 1 April 2011 established by those decisions is the one that had been fixed for them on 1 April 2009 and not the one fixed for them on 24 March 2011 with effect from 1 April 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of 20 July 2011 of the Deputy Secretary General, General Affairs, Human Resources and Internal Affairs, in so far as the multiplication factor resulting from the applicants’ promotion to grade AST 6/1 with effect from 1 April 2011 established by those decisions is the one that had been fixed for them on 1 April 2009 and not the one fixed for them on 24 March 2011 with effect from 1 April 2011;

| — | In the alternative, annul those decisions in so far as the multiplication factor resulting from the applicants’ promotion does not take account of their seniority in step acquired between 1 April 2009 and 1 April 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, annul those decisions in so far as the multiplication factor resulting from the applicants’ promotion does not take account of their seniority in step acquired between 1 April 2009 and 1 April 2011;

| — | In the alternative, annul the decisions of 20 July 2011 in so far as they enter into effect as from 1 April 2011 and not on the date immediately following that on which the decisions of 24 March 2011 entered into effect; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, annul the decisions of 20 July 2011 in so far as they enter into effect as from 1 April 2011 and not on the date immediately following that on which the decisions of 24 March 2011 entered into effect;

| — | Order the EESC to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the EESC to pay the costs.

---
No. 74-389.

No. 74-428.

#### Albemarle Paper Co. et al. *v.*Moody et al.; and Halifax Local No. 425, United Papermakers & Paperworkers, AFL-CIO *v.*Moody et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 419 U. S. 1068.] Motion of Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Before the Second Division,

May 25, 1950

No. 54350.

#### R. D. Modak *v.*United States,

protest 142289-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags and other articles composed wholly or in chief value of vegetable fiber, other than cotton, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 43222.

#### Protests 979566-G, etc., of S. S. Kresge Co. (New York).

*396Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consisted of three-tubed horns similar to those the subject of Abstract 40185. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was therefore sustained.
### Role of water in urban planning and management

By: William Joseph SchneiderDavid A. RickertAndrew Maute Spieker

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir601H

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Concentrations of people in urban areas intensify water problems such as flooding and pollution, but these deleterious effects on water resources can be minimized or corrected by comprehensive planning and management. Such planning of the water resources of an urban area must be based on adequate hydrologic data.

Through the use of a matrix, urban water problems can be evaluated and availability of data assessed. The Washington-Baltimore metropolitan area is used as a case study. The completed matrix provides both a means for developing a meaningful dialogue between the hydrologist and the urban planner and a method for developing a work plan to insure consideration of water-resources data in urban planning.

#### Study Area

#### Table of Contents

.

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Time Warner Telecom Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Larissa L. Herda, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                     
|----- |  | --------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /s/ Larissa L. Herda
|Name: |  | Larissa L. Herda    
|Date: |  | April 30, 2007
September 15, 2011 

Mr. Gerardo Rios 

Chief, Permits Office 

USEPA Region IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Subject: Pio Pico Energy Center 

 Repackaged Application for a Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit 

Dear Mr. Rios: 

As requested by EPA in a telephone conversation on August 9, 2011, we are submitting 

on behalf of Pio Pico Energy Center, LLC a repackaged version of the application filed 

on April 1, 2011 for a PSD permit for the proposed Pio Pico Energy Center (PPEC). This 

repackaged application has been revised, as requested by EPA, to delete certain portions 

of the application which were not relevant to EPA’s review of the PSD permit application 

for PPEC. 

PSD modeling data files are provided as electronic files on media accompanying this 

submittal. 

As requested by EPA, this repackaged application also contains information that 

demonstrates that that PPEC has no potential for a significant adverse impact to any 

threatened or endangered species as a result of nitrogen deposition. 

The generating facility will include three General Electric (GE) LMS100 natural gasfired combustion turbine generators (CTGs), each equipped with water injection to the 

combustors for reducing production of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), a selective catalytic 

reduction (SCR) system with 19 percent aqueous ammonia (NH3) injection to further 

reduce NOx emissions, and an oxidation catalyst to reduce carbon monoxide (CO) 

emissions. The total net generating capacity would be approximately 300 MW. The new 

emitting units will be installed on a 9.9 acre parcel in the southeast quadrant of the 

intersection of Alta Road and Calzada De La Fuente Road, adjacent to the Otay Mesa 

Energy Center. The Project will be a new major source under the federal Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration (PSD) program because it will have the potential to emit more 

than 100,000 TPY of greenhouse gases (GHGs), a federally regulated pollutant. 

sierra 

research

1801 J Street 

Sacramento, CA 95811 

Tel: (916) 444-6666 

Fax: (916) 444-8373

Ann Arbor, MI 

Tel: (734) 761-6666 

Fax: (734) 761-6755 
Gerardo Rios -2- September 15, 2011 

The applicant’s contact information is: 

Gary Chandler 

President, Pio Pico Energy Center, LLC 

P.O. Box 95592 

2542 Singletree Lane 

South Jordan, UT 84095 

If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact the applicant’s 

representative David Jenkins at (317) 431-1004, or Gary Rubenstein or me at (916) 444-

6666. 

Sincerely, 

Steve Hill 

enclosures 

cc: (w/o enclosure) 

 John McKinsey, Stoel Rives LLP 

David Jenkins, Apex Power Group 

 Steve Moore, SDAPCD
# C_2014184EN.01000701.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/7

---

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 April 2014 — Lord Inglewood and Others v European Parliament

(Case C-281/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Additional pension scheme for Members of the European Parliament - Amendment to the additional pension scheme in 2009 - Decisions rejecting the appellants’ applications to benefit from the provisions in force before amendment of the scheme - Errors of law - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Equal treatment - Principle of proportionality))

2014/C 184/09

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Lord Inglewood, Georges Berthu, Guy Bono, David Robert Bowe, Brendan Donnelly, Catherine Guy-Quint, Christine Margaret Oddy, Nicole Thomas-Mauro, Gary Titley, Maartje van Putten, Vincenzo Viola (represented by: S. Orlandi, avocat)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Windisch and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 March 2013 in Joined Cases T-229/11 and T-276/11 Inglewood and Others v Parliament, by which the General Court dismissed the appellants’ action for annulment of the decisions of the European Parliament refusing to grant them their voluntary additional pension, early, at the age of 60 or in part in the form of a lump sum — Errors of law — Infringement of acquired rights — Infringement of the principles of legitimate expectations, legal certainty, equal treatment and proportionality

Inglewood and Others

Parliament

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Lord Inglewood, Mr Georges Berthu, Mr Guy Bono, Mr David Robert Bowe, Mr Brendan Donnelly, Ms Catherine Guy-Quint, Ms Christine Margaret Oddy, Ms Nicole Thomas-Mauro, Mr Gary Titley, Ms Maartje van Putten and Mr Vincenzo Viola are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Lord Inglewood, Mr Georges Berthu, Mr Guy Bono, Mr David Robert Bowe, Mr Brendan Donnelly, Ms Catherine Guy-Quint, Ms Christine Margaret Oddy, Ms Nicole Thomas-Mauro, Mr Gary Titley, Ms Maartje van Putten and Mr Vincenzo Viola are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 03.08.2013.

1

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO CRUZ HERNANDEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-73262 

Agency No. A205-465-394 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 19, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Fernando Cruz Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen proceedings 

and rescind an in absentia removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-73262 

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. 

Arredondo v. Lynch, 824 F.3d 801, 805 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny the petition for 

review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Cruz Hernandez’s motion to 

reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia, where Cruz Hernandez failed 

to demonstrate exceptional circumstances to excuse his absence from the hearing.

See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C); Arredondo, 824 F.3d at 805-06 (setting forth 

standards governing when a motion to reopen may rescind an in absentia removal 

order and discussing exceptional circumstances); see also Valencia-Fragoso v. 

INS, 321 F.3d 1204, 1205-06 (9th Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (concluding BIA did not 

abuse its discretion in determining that petitioner failed to establish that her 

misunderstanding of the hearing time amounted to exceptional circumstances).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted), Edward A. Keible, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of EndwaveCorporation (the “Company”), and Julianne M. Biagini, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:
     **1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1(the ***“Quarterly Report”***) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
     **2. **The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
     **In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the8th day of November, 2004.   /s/ EDWARD A. KEIBLE, JR. /s/ JULIANNE M. BIAGINI   Edward A. Keible, Jr. Julianne M. BiaginiChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of Endwave Corporation under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.
(LOGO)

Atlantic Mortgage 7159 Corklan Drive, Jacksonville, Florida 32258
Atlantic Mortgage & Investment Corporation

Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Master Servicing

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1998 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing  Agreement.  Trust
Agreement.  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of this  Officer's  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its
duties,  responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements  throughout such
year,  or if there has been a default or failure of the servicer to perform an),
of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a description of each default
or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported to Norwest Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;


(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer  Guide
are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged Property.  have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;


(E) All  real estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance on any
Mortgaged  Property,  have  been paid, or if any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota. N.A.;


(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
required  per  section  6050H,  6050J and 6050P of the  Internal  Revenue  Code,
respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

Officer

Assistant Vice President
Title

March 25. 1999
Date

We treat you as if you are the only customer we serve.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1
                        CERTIFICATION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, P. Kim Packard, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Prestolite Electric Holding, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 19, 2004

/s/ P. Kim Packard
------------------
P. Kim Packard
President and Chief Executive Officer