alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Income Properties Ltd. III 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000720460
<NAME> ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES LTD. III
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       11
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          14,162
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          3,797
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,250)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,632
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,779
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,075)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (793)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,075)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (12.26)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofUSIP.Com, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Kathy Christopher, Controller of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Kathy Christopher      |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Kathy Christopher          |
| Controller, USIP.Com, Inc. |
|                       |
| November 10, 2003          |

 

USIP.Com, Inc. does not have a “Chief FinancialOfficer,” Kathy Christopher is the principal financial and accounting officer.

 

----
|Exhibit
      32.2 | CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                   | PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of
International Smart Sourcing, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Rakusin, Chief Financial Officer,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934: and                                                                                    
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
      by the Report.
|  

/s/Michael RakusinMichael RakusinChief Financial OfficerMarch 12, 2008


---
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm 

The Hackett Group, Inc. 

Miami, Florida 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87749 and 333-32342) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69951, 333-90635, and 333-39460) of The Hackett Group, Inc. (formerly Answerthink, Inc. prior to January 1, 2008) of our reports dated March 10,2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of The Hackett Group, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Miami, Florida

March 10, 2008
#### CITY OF PALESTINE, Petitioner, v. Harold DAVIS, et ux, Respondents.

No. 97-1170.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Sept. 24, 1998.

Williams S. Helfand, Kevin D. Jewell, Houston, for Petitioner.

James C. Boone, Jr., Palestine, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Harold and Patricia Ann Davis seek to recover property damage and resulting mental anguish damage caused by the City of Palestine’s alleged failure to properly inspect and maintain culverts running beneath the Davises’ property. The trial court granted summary judgment for the City, but the court of appeals reversed and remanded for trial. 973 S.W.2d 319. This Court vacates the judgment of the court of appeals and remands the cause to that court for further proceedings in light of *City of Tyler v. Likes,*962 S.W.2d 489 (Tex.1997), which was decided after the court of appeals rendered its judgment. *See*Tex.R.App. P. 60.2(f).
Order entered February 11, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-19-01579-CV

IN RE PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 101s t Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-05255



### ORDER
Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Evans

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE
(Reap. Dec. 9108)

#### Crystallus Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 832873-1/2.

(Decided March 21, 1958)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Joseph Schwarts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard H. Welsh,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of earthenware articles exported from Italy on January 18, 1953, and advanced in value by the appraiser.

When this case was called for trial, counsel for the plaintiff stated that the issue was whether these goods, which were substandard goods, were properly appraised at the value of standard goods, and it was agreed in effect that they were not. Counsel stipulated as follows:

> *761Me. Schwartz: We stipulate, if the Court please, as follows:

> As to each item on this invoice, the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice unit price, plus packing as invoiced;

> And we further stipulate that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

> Is that agreeable, Mr. Welsh?

> Me. Welsh: The Government so stipulates, and I desire to state for the record that this matter was taken up with Examiner Leavitt. I discussed the whole matter with him, and this stipulation meets with his approval.

On the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of each of the items enumerated on the invoice herein and that such values are the invoice unit prices, plus packing, as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 43225.

#### Protest 6939-K of Goldfarb Novelty Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of paperweights chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes. On the authority of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20) the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunnyside Acres Mobile Estates
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hui
Peng Cheng, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 20, 2009


By: /s/Hui Peng Cheng
    -----------------
    Hui Ping Cheng
    President and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Gabriel Calderon-Ortiz,

Petitioner, 

 v. 

Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 21-327

Agency No. A097-764-375

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Gabriel Calderon-Ortiz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his 

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision deeming his applications for 

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against 

Torture abandoned, and finding him ineligible for cancellation of removal. We 

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not 

precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-327

the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th 

Cir. 2006), and we review de novo claims of due process violations in 

immigration proceedings, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 

2004). We deny the petition for review.

We do not address Calderon-Ortiz’s contention that he was unjustly 

denied withholding of removal because the agency did not adjudicate this 

application, see Santiago-Rodriguez v. Holder, 657 F.3d 820, 829 (9th Cir. 

2011) (review limited to the grounds relied on by the agency), and CalderonOrtiz does not contend the BIA erred in finding the IJ properly determined that 

he abandoned his application for withholding of removal, see Corro-Barragan 

v. Holder, 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest issue in 

opening brief resulted in waiver).

In his opening brief, Calderon-Ortiz does not contend that the BIA erred 

in determining he is ineligible for cancellation of removal due to his criminal 

convictions. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 

2013) (concluding petitioner waived challenge to issue not specifically raised 

and argued in his opening brief). Thus, Calderon-Ortiz’s cancellation of 

removal claim fails.

We reject Calderon-Ortiz’s assertion that he is a lawful permanent 

resident as unsupported by the record.

The BIA did not err in concluding that Calderon-Ortiz failed to establish 

a violation of his due process rights based on allegations that the IJ was biased, 
3 21-327

interrupted him, and failed to provide a reason for denying relief. See Lata v. 

INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice to 

prevail on a due process claim).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6581.

Entry No. 710586, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England, July 28, 1941, etc.

Certified July 28, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 26, 1941, etc.

(Decided December 5, 1946)

*Jeróme Q. Clifford*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawRence, Judge:

It has been stipulated and agreed between the parties to this proceeding that the issues in these appeals for reappraisement relating to certain silver-plated table or kitchen utensils “are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*Suit 4513, C. A. D, 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.”

Upon the agreed facts of record I find the export value of said merchandise, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions .made by the importer on entries because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. OA07-22-000] 

Take notice that on May 14, 2007, Lockhart Power Company filed a request for waiver of certain requirements of Order No. 890, III FERC Statues & Regulations, ¶ 31,131 (2007). 

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                 

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 13, 2007.                 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E7-9981 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 20, 2019

No. 04-19-00244-CR

Christopher KINES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-07-153-CRW

Honorable Lynn Ellison, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Julie Verastegui’s Notification of Late Reporter’s Record is hereby GRANTED. The 

Reporter’s Record is due July 15, 2019.

It is so ORDERED on June 20, 2019.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
# C_2013026EN.01007601.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/76

---

Action brought on 14 November 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-139/12)

2013/C 26/158

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of EPSO not to include the applicant in the list of persons who have passed the tests at the end of the training programme which is part of the certification procedure and a claim for damages.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the action admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the action admissible and well-founded;

| — | annul the contested measure; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested measure;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 10 000 as compensation for the damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 10 000 as compensation for the damage suffered;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1852 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1852

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the Marine Gunnery 
 Sergeant John David Fry scholarship to include spouses of members of 
 the Armed Forces who die in the line of duty, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 2011

Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the Marine Gunnery 
 Sergeant John David Fry scholarship to include spouses of members of 
 the Armed Forces who die in the line of duty, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Spouses of Heroes Education Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF MARINE GUNNERY SERGEANT JOHN DAVID FRY 
              SCHOLARSHIP.

    (a) Expansion of Entitlement.--Subsection (b)(9) of section 3311 of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``or spouse'' 
after ``child''.
    (b) Limitation and Election on Certain Benefits.--Subsection (f) of 
such section is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
        paragraphs:
            ``(2) Limitation.--The entitlement of an individual to 
        assistance under subsection (a) pursuant to paragraph (9) of 
        subsection (b) because the individual was a spouse of a person 
        described in such paragraph shall expire on the earlier of--
                    ``(A) the date that is 15 years after the date on 
                which the person died; and
                    ``(B) the date on which the individual remarries.
            ``(3) Election on receipt of certain benefits.--A surviving 
        spouse entitled to assistance under subsection (a) pursuant to 
        paragraph (9) of subsection (b) who is also entitled to 
        educational assistance under chapter 35 of this title may not 
        receive assistance under both this section and such chapter, 
        but shall make an irrevocable election (in such form and manner 
        as the Secretary may prescribe) under which section or chapter 
        to receive educational assistance.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 96-292.

#### Johnson et al. *v.*Fankell.

Sup. Ct. Idaho. Certiorari granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Windsor Woodmont Black Hawk Resort Corp., a
Colorado corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

        The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated: May 21, 2004                 /s/  Jerry L. Dauderman
                                    -----------------------------------
                                         Jerry Dauderman
                                         Chairman of the Board and
                                         Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 21, 2004                 /s/  Michael L. Armstrong
                                    -----------------------------------
                                         Michael L. Armstrong
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer