alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting: 

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 

# Date And Time: 

Tuesday, May 13, 2008, 10 a.m. Eastern Time. 

# Place: 

Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507. 

# Status:

The meeting will be open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

Open Session: 

1. Announcement of Notation Votes,

2. Change to EEOC Order 110.002, Reorganization of Administrative Judge Function and Creation of the Office of Federal Sector Programs, and 

3. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—Federal Sector Regulations, 29 CFR part 1614. 

# Note:

                        In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                    

                    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.                     *Contact Person for More Information:*                     Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.                 

Dated: May 2, 2008. 

Stephen Llewellyn, 

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat. 

This Notice Issued May 2, 2008.

 [FR Doc. E8-10134 Filed 5-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Vertical lift modules installed at DLA Distribution Anniston bolster productivity

By Matthew Mahoney, DLA Distribtution Public Affairs

                ANNISTON, Ala.  –              
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Anniston, Alabama, installed new vertical lift modules – a modernization effort that maximizes available cubic space, and enhances the support DDAA can provide to the Anniston Army Depot.

The installation of VLMs was part of a multi-year effort in conjunction with the U.S. Army.

“These modules eliminate a lot of walking time for employees,” Alexander Dinh, DLA Distribution Installation Management said. “They allow employees to remain in one spot while the machines do the task of retrieving bins.”

The use of VLMs is not new within DLA Distribution, but these are the first such modules installed at DDAA.

Currently DLA Distribution typically uses VLMs for small item pick and stow operations. The modules automate and increase the efficiency of small tasks, saving time on man hours overall.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionDDAAANAD
# C_2013026EN.01006301.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/63

---

Action brought on 19 November 2012 — Murnauer Markenvertrieb v OHIM (NOTFALL CREME)

(Case T-504/12)

2013/C 26/124

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Murnauer Markenvertrieb GmbH (Trebur, Germany) (represented by F. Traub and H. Daniel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 September 2012 in Case R 271/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 September 2012 in Case R 271/2012-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark, including the word element ‘NOTFALL CREME’ for goods in Classes 3 and 5 — Community trade mark application No 10 107 134

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 83 of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2015398EN.01000201.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons — Belgium) — Ville de Mons v Base Company SA, formerly KPN Group Belgium SA

(Case C-346/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive 2002/20/EC - Article 13 - Fee for rights to install facilities - Scope - Municipal regulations making owners of mobile telephone transmission pylons and masts subject to payment of a tax))

(2015/C 398/02)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Mons

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ville de Mons

Applicant:

Defendant: Base Company SA, formerly KPN Group Belgium SA

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) must be interpreted as not precluding a tax, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, being imposed on the owner of free-standing structures, such as transmission pylons or masts intended to support the antennas required for the functioning of the mobile telecommunication network, and which it was not possible to place on an existing site.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.

1

---
No. 44390.

#### Protest 29637-K of Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of book bindings in chief value of leather. It was therefore held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1410 and the trade agreement with the United Kingdom. (T. D. 49753) as claimed.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 BRUCE PUMA, as Personal 

3 Representative of THE ESTATE 

4 OF SUSAN GERARD,

5 Plaintiff-Appellant,

6 v. NO. A-1-CA-36290

7 BRENDA WALL,

8 Defendant-Appellee.

9 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY

10 Sylvia Lamar, District Judge

11 Albuquerque Legal and Fiduciary 

12 Bruce Joseph Puma, Jr.

13 Albuquerque, NM

14 for Appellant

15 Robert Richards

16 Santa Fe, NM

17 for Appellee

18 MEMORANDUM OPINION

19 ZAMORA, Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} AFFIRMED.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________

7 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

11 _________________________________

12 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the annual report of The Quantum Group, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Signed on March 26, 2007



/s/Donald B. Cohen

Donald B. Cohen

Chief Financial Officer of The Quantum Group, Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE COURT OF 

JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE

:

:

:

:

No. 844

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2020, the Honorable Daniel D. McCaffery, 

Philadelphia, is hereby appointed as a member of the Court of Judicial Discipline for a 

term of four years, commencing September 20, 2020.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Hybrid 60

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on January 19, 2011 between Hybrid 60 and EPA 

and included the following individuals:

Hybrid 60: Jeff Zyburt, Jesse Baker, Lauren Gillis

EPA: Angela Cullen

The discussion focused primarily on the following elements of the proposal:

 Advanced technology credits

 Hybrid OBD
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Brett D. Mayer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bingham Canyon Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 9, 2007 /s/ Brett D. Mayer Brett D. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer
# C_2014409EN.01002501.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/25

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG

(Case C-509/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Application for registration of a figurative mark with the word element ‘Metro’ in blue and yellow - Opposition by the proprietor of the coloured Community figurative mark containing the word ‘GRUPOMETROPOLIS’ - Rejection of the opposition))

2014/C 409/36

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones, SL (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, abogado)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent), MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: J.-C. Plate, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones SL is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones SL is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 336, of 16.11.2013.

1

---
No. 55624.

#### T. D. Downing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 116967-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[House Report 111-420]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     111-420

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENTS TO THE BILL (H.R. 
  3961) TO AMEND TITLE XVIII OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT TO REFORM THE 
   MEDICARE SGR PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR PHYSICIANS AND TO REINSTITUTE AND 
 UPDATE THE PAY-AS-YOU-GO REQUIREMENT OF BUDGET NEUTRALITY ON NEW TAX 
 AND MANDATORY SPENDING LEGISLATION, ENFORCED BY THE THREAT OF ANNUAL, 
                        AUTOMATIC SEQUESTRATION

                                _______
                                

 February 25, 2010.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

  Mr. Perlmutter, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1109]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1109, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 
amendments to H.R. 3961, to amend title XVIII of the Social 
Security Act to reform the Medicare SGR payment system for 
physicians and to reinstitute and update the Pay-As-You-Go 
requirement of budget neutrality on new tax and mandatory 
spending legislation, enforced by the threat of annual, 
automatic sequestration. The resolution makes in order a single 
motion by the Chair of the Committee on the Judiciary to concur 
in the Senate amendments. The resolution waives all points of 
order against consideration of the motion except clause 10 of 
rule XXI and provides that the Senate amendments shall be 
considered as read. Finally, the resolution provides one hour 
of debate on the motion equally divided and controlled by the 
chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    Although the rule waives all points of order against 
consideration of the motion to concur in the Senate amendments 
to H.R. 3961 (except for clause 10 of rule XXI) the Committee 
is not aware of any points of order against the motion. The 
waiver of all points of order against the motion is 
prophylactic.

                                  

```
No. 55619.

#### Suey Chong & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 985919-G (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# C_2014078EN.01001103.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/11

---

Order of the General Court of 22 January 2014 — Faktor, B. i W. Gęsina v Commission

(Case T-468/12) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Lateness - No force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances - Manifest inadmissibility)

2014/C 78/23

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Firma Handlowa Faktor B. i W. Gęsina, Gęsina Wojciech (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: H. Mackiewicz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Keppenne and M. Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 554/2012 of 19 June 2012 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2012 L 166, p. 20).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Firma Handlowa Faktor B. i W. Gęsina, Gęsina Wojciech is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Firma Handlowa Faktor B. i W. Gęsina, Gęsina Wojciech is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.

1

---