alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Jose Araque, President, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.






/s/ Jose
          Araque
 Jose
              Araque
 President,
              Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,
 Chairman
              of the Board of Directors




August
      7,
      2007
No. 6164.

#### MARTIN SHEPARD vs. CHARLES M. HERO.

Syllabus.

Where one party to a contract insists upon carrying it out in an unlawful manner, it is an active breach of the contract, entitling the other party to sue at once for the profits he would have earned thereunder.

Appeal from the Civil District Court, for the Parish of Orleans, Division “D,” No. 103,772. Hon. Porter Parker, Judge.

F. McGloin, Teissier *&*Teissier, for plaintiff and appellant.

F. Rivers Richardson, for defendant and appellee.

*341Opinion and decree, June 15th, 1914.

Rehearing refused, June 30th, 1914.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Plaintiff alleges that he was engaged by defendant to plan and supervise the erection of a building, for which he was to receive as compensation, 8% of the cost of construction. That defendant, over plaintiff’s protest, made certain changes in the plans and undertook to do, and did do, certain things in violation of the building laws and regulations.

Whereupon plaintiff declined to supervise the further progress of the work, and now brings this suit for the full amount of the compensation fixed by the contract.

When defendant undertook to violate the law, and in spite of plaintiff’s protest still persisted in doing so,-this was an active breach of the contract, because “it was inconsistent with his obligation” to permit plaintiff to execute his part of the contract in a lawful manner. C. a, i93i.

From, the moment of that breach plaintiff was entitled to damages. C. C., 1932. And his damages are “the profit of which he has been deprived.” C. C., 1934.

As it is precisely this profit that plaintiff is suing for, we do not see how his petition fails to state a cause of action.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be reversed, and it is now ordered that defendant’s exception of no cause of action be overruled and the case remanded to the Court a qua to be proceeded with according to law; defendant to pay the costs of this appeal.

Judgment reversed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Nortel Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation
(the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
(the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |  |                                                                     
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  May 9, 2003 |  | /s/ Frank A. DunnFrank A. Dunn
President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   
|                   
|Dated:  May 9, 2003 |  | /s/ Douglas C. BeattyDouglas C. Beatty
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Annual Report of International Smart Sourcing, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Hale, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1.     | The report fully complies   with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange   Act of 1934; and                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | 2.     | The information contained   in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial   condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period   covered by the Report. |

 

|   | /s/DAVID HALE                    |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   | David Hale                       |
|   | Acting Chief Financial   Officer |
|   | March 25, 2005                   |
Case lío. 10,088.

#### NEIL v. ABBOTT.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 193.] 1

District Court, District of Columbia.

Jan. 20, 1820.

Limitations op Actions — Offeb of Comfro-mise — Effect.

The offer of terms of compromise is not sufficient to take the case out of the statute of limitations.

[See Ash v. Hayman, Case No. 572; Bank of Columbia v. Sweeny, Id. 882.]

To take the ease out of the statute of limitations, the plaintiff offered evidence of the acknowledgments of the defendant’s intestate, Campbell, when offering a compromise, viz. that Campbell acknowledged the debt to be due by Campbell and Matlock, and offered to pay one-half, although he said he was discharged by the insolvent law of Missouri, if the plaintiff would give him time.

Mr. Key, for defendant,

objected to this evidence, and cited Baird v. Eice, 1 Call, 26.

Mr. Marbury, contra,

cited 3 Esp. 113.

1

 [Beported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

(THETJSTON, Circuit Judge,

contra) decided that the acknowledgment, under those circumstances, could not be given in evidence. Verdict for the defendant.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10035]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-62,947]

Norcal Pottery Products, Macrame Department, Richmond 
Distribution Center, Richmond, California; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By applications dated April 15, 2008, petitioners requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of 
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of the 
subject firm. The denial notice was signed on March 21, 2008 and 
published in the Federal Register on April 24, 2008 (73 FR 22169).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that criteria I.A and II.A have not been met. The 
investigation revealed that the subject firm did not separate or 
threaten to separate a significant number or proportion of workers as 
required by Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information regarding employment and layoffs at the subject 
firm.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 30th day of April, 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-10035 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
Exhibit 99.2

The following certification accompanies the issuer's Annual Report on Form 10-K
and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and IC-25967,
dated March 21, 2003.

                                ANSWERTHINK, INC

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Answerthink, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. Brennan,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/  John F. Brennan
                                        ----------------------------
                                        John F. Brennan
                                        Executive Vice President
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
                                        March 31, 2003
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-30376 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ANTHONY D. DADE, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:05-CR-30012-1
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Anthony D. Dade has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dade has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r l e ave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Octob er 21 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-30376 Document: 00511640725 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011

### No. 11-30376

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H 

### C I R 

### . R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-30376 Document: 00511640725 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Alamosa Holdings, Inc. (the"Company") for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Kendall Cowan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ Kendall Cowan

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Name:    KendallCowan Title:      Chief Financial OfficerDate:      May 10, 2005

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.

43

----
# C_2012303EN.01002201.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/22

---

Action brought on 25 July 2012 — Soltau v Commission

(Case T-333/12)

2012/C 303/43

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christoff Soltau (Adendorf, Germany) (represented by: T. Rosenkranz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission of 14 May 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission of 14 May 2012;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant claims that the second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 (1) does not preclude him from accessing the Commission’s opinion, which the latter communicated to the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court) in accordance with Article 15(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (2) in the context of a cartel case. In the applicant’s view, Article 4(2) does not apply to the document to which the applicant seeks access, since the proceedings before the Austrian court do not, in principle, fall within the scope of protection of that provision. Even if that were the case, the document in question would not fall within the scope of the provision, since the document was not communicated by the Commission as a party to the proceedings. Moreover, the Commission’s decision cannot be justified on the basis of protection of the proceedings in Case C-681/11 Schenker and Others, pending before the Court of Justice. Indeed, the reference for a preliminary ruling was made by the Austrian Oberster Gerichtshof in the context of the cartel case at issue; however, the document in question was neither issued by the Commission in the context of the proceedings for a preliminary ruling, nor does its content relate to the questions referred.

1

2

Schenker and Others

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles (101) and (102) (TFEU) (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

2

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of South Shore Resources Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated this 13thday of August, 2007.

RICHARD WACHTERRichard WachterChief Financial Officer

























---
No. 74-6023.

#### Hawk *v.*Michigan et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **FirstBingo.com** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended **June 30, 2005** as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard L. Wachter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 22nd day of August, 2005.

 
/s/ Richard L. Wachter 
Richard L. Wachter 
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2015198EN.01000701.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 April 2015 — European Parliament v Council of the European Union

(Case C-540/13) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Setting of the date on which an earlier decision is to take effect - Determination of the legal basis - Legal framework applicable following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon - Transitional provisions - Secondary legal basis - Consultation of Parliament))

(2015/C 198/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Parliament (represented by: F. Drexler, A. Caiola and M. Pencheva, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Pleśniak and A.F. Jensen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls Council Decision 2013/392/EU of 22 July 2013 fixing the date of effect of Decision 2008/633/JHA concerning access for consultation of the Visa Information System (VIS) by designated authorities of Member States and by Europol for the purposes of the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and of other serious criminal offences; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls Council Decision 2013/392/EU of 22 July 2013 fixing the date of effect of Decision 2008/633/JHA concerning access for consultation of the Visa Information System (VIS) by designated authorities of Member States and by Europol for the purposes of the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and of other serious criminal offences;

| 2) | Declares that the effects of Decision 2013/392 are to be maintained until the entry into force of a new act intended to replace it; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Declares that the effects of Decision 2013/392 are to be maintained until the entry into force of a new act intended to replace it;

| 3) | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 359, 7.12.2013.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1645 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1645

To establish an Oleoresin Capsicum Spray Pilot Program in the Bureau of 
                    Prisons, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 2011

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish an Oleoresin Capsicum Spray Pilot Program in the Bureau of 
                    Prisons, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Correctional Officer 
Protective Equipment Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. OLEORESIN CAPSICUM SPRAY PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) Pilot Program Authorized.--The Director of the Federal Bureau 
of Prisons shall conduct a pilot program to determine the effectiveness 
of the routine issuance of Oleoresin Capsicum spray to staff.
    (b) Scope of Pilot Program.--The Director of the Federal Bureau of 
Prisons shall have the discretion to--
            (1) select the specific Bureau of Prisons institutions, 
        which shall include high security and administrative 
        facilities, to participate in the pilot program;
            (2) determine the length of the pilot program, not to 
        exceed 12 months;
            (3) select the type of Oleoresin Capsicum spray device 
        utilized in the pilot program; and
            (4) determine which Bureau of Prisons staff will be 
        authorized to participate in the pilot program, which shall 
        include bargaining unit employees and not only include 
        supervisors and managers.
    (c) Requirements Subject to Availability of Appropriations.--The 
requirements of this section are subject to the availability of 
appropriations.
    (d) GAO Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date on which 
the pilot program ends, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall submit to Congress an evaluation of the effects of the pilot 
program and provide to Congress any research and analysis that the 
Comptroller General determines appropriate on tools to improve officer 
safety in Federal prisons.
                                 <all>
```