alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1987 

To provide for the release of the reversionary interest held by the United 

States in certain land conveyed by the United States in 1950 for the 

establishment of an airport in Cook County, Minnesota. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2011 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. FRANKEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To provide for the release of the reversionary interest held 

by the United States in certain land conveyed by the 

United States in 1950 for the establishment of an airport 

in Cook County, Minnesota. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST AND 

4 USE CONDITIONS, COOK COUNTY AIRPORT, 

5 COOK COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 

6 (a) RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST RE7 QUIRED.—The Secretary of Agriculture, acting on behalf 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1987 IS

1 of the United States, shall release, without consider2 ation— 

3 (1) the conditions imposed on the use of the 

4 parcel of land originally conveyed by the Secretary 

5 pursuant to section 16 of the Federal Airport Act 

6 (Act of May 13, 1946, ch. 251, 60 Stat. 170) to the 

7 State of Minnesota by deed executed May 31, 1950, 

8 for the establishment of an airport in Cook County, 

9 Minnesota; and 

10 (2) the reversionary interest retained by the 

11 United States in connection with such conditions. 

12 (b) INSTRUMENT OF RELEASE.—The Secretary of 

13 Agriculture shall execute and file in the appropriate office 

14 a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate in15 strument reflecting the release of the reversionary interest 

16 and conditions under subsection (a). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



COMPUTER ACCESS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Computer Access Technology Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dan Wilnai, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|Date:  August 8, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/    DAN WILNAI                                           
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |     |  |                                                             
|                      |  |     |  | Dan Wilnai                                                  
|                      |  |     |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
<PAGE>

Exhibit 2.0                STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT

                            Dated: April 29, 2000

Whereas. USIP.com, Inc. is a Utah corporation licensed to do business in the
State of New York and is in part an owner and operator of payphones;

Whereas Riveria Bay Holding Trust of Gibraltar owns Cointel Leasing Inc. and
N B Payphones LTD.

Whereas, Cointel Leasing, Inc. is a New York Corporation and owns and
operates 45 public payphones in the Central New York area;

Whereas, NB Payphones, Inc. is a Pennsylvania corporation and is the owner
and operator of 641 payphones in the State of Pennsylvania;

Whereas, Riveria Bay Holding Trust the sole shareholder of Cointel and NB
Payphones;

Whereas, on April 29, 2000 Riveria Bay Holding Trust agreed as the sole
shareholder to sell its shares in NB Payphones and Cointel Leasing to USIP
and USIP agreed to purchase the shares and did purchase the shares on that
date; and

Whereas, the parties agree to memorialize the terms and conditions in this
document;

The parties agree that:

     1.  USIP's Board of Directors approved the purchase of all the shares of
         Cointel Leasing and NB Payphones thereby gaining control of 688
         payphones.

     2.  USIP did issue 8,750,000 shares in full payment to Riveria Bay Holding
         Trust.

     3.  USIP did assume the control of the businesses on April 29, 2000.

     4.  As the sole shareholder and director of both selling corporations
         Riveria Bay Holding Trust approved the sale.

     5.  Cointel Leasing and NB Payphones have continued to operate as
         subsidiaries of USIP.

     USIP.com, INC.                              RIVERIA BAY HOLDING TRUST

     By: /s/ Craig Burton                            By: /s/ Jerome Hauer
        -----------------                               -----------------
          Craig Burton                                   Jerome Hauuer
          President


                                      11
Case No. *8,728.*

#### McCORMICK v. WALKER.

[1 Hayw. & H. 86.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May 28, 1842.

Infancy — Promise to Pay after of Age — Duress — Pay when Able — Knowleuge of Discharge on Account of Minority.

1. A promise made to pay a note at a time when the defendant was of full age, was made under duress, if made under a threat that if he did not pay he would be sued.

2. Upon a promise of the defendant to pay when able, the plaintiff must prove the ability of the defendant to pay.

3. An acknowledgment made after the maturity of a. debt contracted while the defendant was a minor, and a promise to pay, would not be sufficient unless the defendant was aware at the time of the promise that he was discharged of the debt by reason of his minority.

Action was brought [against Henry Walker] on the following promissory note: “$4,-200. Washington, Sept. 21, 1839. Twelve months after date, I promise to pay to the order of Colburn & Tufts, for value received, at the Bank of Metropolis, forty-two hundred dollars. Jno. Walker.” Endorsed by Colburn & Tufts, Lewis Walker, Henry Walker and Charles McCormick. The plea was infancy. On the trial the defendant offered the deposition of Dorcas Walker, mother of the defendant, in which she deposes that the defendant is her son, and that he was bom October 1st, 1819. The verdict was for the defendant.

H. M. Morfit, for plaintiff.

Brent & Brent, for defendant.

The plaintiff, through his counsel, moved for a new' trial: Because THE COURT ex*1337pressed an opinion that a promise made by the defendant to pay the note at a time when he was of full age, was made under duress because the witness told him if he did not pay. he would be sued, which opinion the plaintiff, by his counsel contends is erroneous at law. Because THE COURT said in the progress of the trial, that upon a promise of defendant to pay when able, the plaintiff was bound to prove that the defendant was able to pay before action brought. Because THE COURT said, that an acknowledgment made after maturity of a debt contracted while defendant was a minor, and a promise to pay would not be sufficient unless the defendant was aware at the time of the promise that he was discharged of the debt by reason of his minority; all of which expressions of opinion influenced the jury in their verdict, and were, as the plaintiff contends, erroneous in law.

The motion was overruled.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

     Arthur Andersen, our independent auditors, has issued the audit report
included in our annual report on Form 20-F. In compliance with Release Nos.
33-8070, 34-45590, 35-27503, 39-2395, IA-2018, IC-25464, FR-62, File No.
S7-03-02, we confirm that Arthur Andersen has represented to us that the audit
was subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting
and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards. Arthur Andersen has also
represented to us that that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur
Andersen's personnel working on audits, availability of national office
consultation and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur
Andersen, to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.


/s/ FLAG Limited
FLAG Limited
London, England
June 28, 2002
No. 39156.

#### Protests 917299-G, etc., of De Grauw Aymar & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the records presented the protests were overruled.
#### Kenley E. BURKE, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF the MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY, John W. Lasher and Kathleen Gregg, Appellees-Defendants.

No. 53A01-9806-CV-236.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

July 7, 1999.

*1289Rudolph Wm. Savich, Bloomington, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant.

Gary J. Clendening, Kendra G. Gjerdin-gen, Mallor Clendening Grodner & Bohrer, Bloomington, Indiana, Attorneys for Appel-lees.

OPINION—ON REHEARING

NAJAM, Judge

Kenley E. Burke petitions for rehearing of our opinion in *Burke v. Board of Directors of Monroe County Public Library,*709 N.E.2d 1036 (Ind.Ct.App.1999). There, we affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in a suit Burke initiated against the Board of Directors of the Monroe County Public Library, John W. Lasher and Kathleen Gregg for breach of contract, intentional interference with an employment contract and retaliatory discharge. We decided that those claims sounded in tort and were barred because Burke failed to provide the 180-day notice required by the Indiana Tort Claims Act. We also concluded that Burke failed to designate evidence to support his claim that he was terminated for exercising his right to free speech.

Burke now seeks rehearing and contends that we improperly found, on a separate ground, that his complaint was untimely under Section 5 of the Administrative Orders and Procedures Act (the “AOPA”). *See*Ind.Code § 4-21.5-5-5. Burke is correct. The Monroe County Public Library is not an agency within contemplation of the AOPA, *see*Ind.Code § 4-21.5-1-3, and Section 5 does not apply. Burke’s petition for rehearing is granted on that issue, and we vacate that part of our opinion in which we said that his complaint was untimely under the AOPA.

Nevertheless, the Tort Claims Act applies to Burke’s claims for breach of contract, intentional interference with an employment contract and retaliatory discharge. Burke did not seek judicial review in the trial court, and we reaffirm that, on appeal, he cannot avoid application of the Tort Claims Act notice requirement by recasting his complaint as a petition for judicial review. *Burke,*709 N.E.2d at 1041.

Petition for Rehearing granted to modify our opinion, in part, and denied in all other respects.

SHARPNACK, C.J., and BAILEY, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          55,902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    143,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               273,730
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 370,295
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   370,295
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,816
<CGS>                                          235,312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               238,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (230,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (230,397)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         ResortQuest International, Inc.
                               Subsidiary Listing

ResortQuest International, Inc.
Abbott and Andrews Realty, Inc.
Abbott Realty Services, Inc.
Abbott Resorts, Inc.
Accommodations Center, Inc.
Advantage Vacation Homes By Styles, Inc.
B & B on the Beach, Inc.
Base Mountain Properties, Inc.
Bluebill Properties, Inc.
Bluebill Vacation Properties, Inc.
Brindley & Brindley Realty & Development, Inc.
Coastal Real Estate Sales, Inc.
Coastal Real Estate Sales Merger Co.
Coastal Resorts International, Inc.
Coastal Resorts International Merger Co.
Coastal Resorts Management, Inc.
Coastal Resorts Realty, L. L.C.
Coates, Reid & Waldron, Inc.
Collection of Fine Properties, Inc.
CRW Property Management, Inc.
Columbine Management Company, Inc.
Cove Management Services, Inc.
Dunhill Real Estate Services, Ltd.
Exclusive Vacation Properties, Inc.
First Resort Software, Inc.
Florida Residential Rentals, Inc.
Florida Residential Rental Merger Co.
High Country Resorts, Inc.
High Country Resorts II Merger Co.
Hotel Corporation of the Pacific, Inc.
Houston & O'Leary Company
Howey Acquisition, Inc.
K-T-F Acquisition Co.
Langford Realty, Inc.
Langford Resorts, Inc.
Maui Condominium & Home Realty, Inc.
Mountain High Management, Inc.
Mountain Valley Properties, Inc.
Naples/Marco Vacation Accommodations, Inc.
Naples/Marco Vacation Accommodation Merger Co.
Peak Ski Rentals, LLC
Plantation Resort Management, Inc.
Priscilla Murphy Realty, Inc.
Priscilla Murphy Vacation Rentals, Inc.
R&R Resort Rental Properties, Inc.
REP Holdings, Ltd.
Realty Consultants, Inc.
Resort Property Management, Inc.
Ridgepine, Inc.
Ryan's Golden Eagle Management, Inc.
S.I.I.K., Inc.
Scottsdale Resort Accommodations, Inc.
Shoreline Rentals, Inc.



<PAGE>
Solutions, Inc.
SP Ohio, Inc.
Steamboat Premier Properties, Inc.
Styles Estates, Ltd., Inc.
Telluride Resort Accommodations, Inc.
Ten Mile Holdings, Ltd.
The Management Company, Inc.
The Maury People, Inc.
Tops'l Club of NW Florida, Inc.
The Tops'l Group, Inc.
The Tops'l Sales Group, Inc.
Trupp-Hodnett Enterprises, Inc.
Universal Vacation Acquisition Co., LLC
Whistler Chalets Holding Corp.
Whistler Chalets Ltd.
Whistler Exclusive Property Management, Ltd.
Whistler Peak Properties, Ltd.
Worthy Owner Rental Group, Inc.
No. 96-7972.

#### Isom *v.*United States.

C. Á. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1735 

To approve the transfer of Yellow Creek Port properties in Iuka, Mississippi. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2011 

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To approve the transfer of Yellow Creek Port properties 

in Iuka, Mississippi. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF YELLOW CREEK PORT PROP4 ERTIES. 

5 In accordance with section 4(k) of the Tennessee Val6 ley Authority Act of 1933 (16 U.S.C. 831c(k)), Congress 

7 approves the conveyance by the Tennessee Valley Author8 ity, on behalf of the United States, to the State of Mis9 sissippi of the Yellow Creek Port properties owned by the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1735 IS

1 United States and in the custody of the Authority at Iuka, 

2 Mississippi, as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1880 

To repeal the health care law’s job-killing health insurance tax. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2011 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. HATCH, and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To repeal the health care law’s job-killing health insurance 

tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs and Premium 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTING PATIENTS FROM HIGHER PREMIUMS. 

7 Section 9010 of the Patient Protection and Afford8 able Care Act (Public Law 111–148), as amended by sec9 tion 10905 of such Act and by section 1406 of the Health 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1880 IS

1 Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public 

2 Law 111–152), is repealed. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DSCR Visitor Center moves to appointment only for CAC, retiree, dependent ID cards

By DLA Aviation Public Affairs

                Richmond, Va.  –              
Due to the ongoing Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic and guidance regarding social distancing, the Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, Visitor Center will begin issuing common access cards, retiree and military dependent identification cards by appointment only effective March 26.

This will enable the Visitor Center to continue to support customers in an effective manner while complying with social distancing protocol and ensuring the maximum safety of customers and employees. 

Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS) cards and issuance of passes for official visits will continue as normal.  We appreciate your patience in the current environment.Appointments can be made through the following website https://www.dla.mil/Aviation/Installation/Visitors/

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DSCRDefense Supply Center RichmondsafetyDBIDS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1958 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1958

   To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until May 31, 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 7, 2011

  Mr. Vitter (for himself and Ms. Landrieu) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the National Flood Insurance Program until May 31, 2012.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Program Extension.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2011'' and inserting ``May 31, 2012''.
    (b) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2011'' and inserting ``May 31, 2012''.
    (c) Repeal.--The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 
112-36; 125 Stat. 386) is amended by striking section 130.
                                 <all>
```