alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nortel Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                      
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 16, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    PAVITER S.
BINNING                            
|                         |  |  |  | Paviter S. Binning                                   
|                         |  |  |  | Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Restructuring Officer*                         



|* | As Chief Restructuring Officer, Paviter S. Binning is performing the functions of a principal executive officer.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of DCI USA, Inc. (the "Company")
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 26, 2005                /s/ Jonathan Ilan Ofir
                                       -----------------------
                                      Jonathan Ilan Ofir
                                      Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.39

                      DONNELLY, McNAMARA & GUSTAFSON, P.C.
                                ATTORNEYS AT LAW
                                150 DANBURY ROAD
                                  P.O. BOX 2006
                       RIDGEFIELD, CONNECTICUT 06877-0906
                                      -----
                                (203) 438-6534

                                          September 12, 1995

Mr. James G. Binch, President & CEO
Memry Corporation
57 Commerce Drive
Brookfield, Connecticut 06804

Re:  Brookfield Commerce/Memry Corporation Lease Agreement

Dear Jim:

      This letter is to inform you that your option to renew the above
referenced lease agreement expires on September 30, 1995.

      If you wish to continue the lease for the additional five (5) years,
please execute a copy of this letter.

                                Very truly yours,

                                /s/ Paul S. McNamara
                                --------------------
                                Paul S. McNamara

PSM/ces

Option Exercised
Memry Corporation

by /s/ James G. Binch
  --------------------
  James G. Binch, Its.
  President and CEO
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA)

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on February 9, 2011 between EMA and EPA and 

included the following individuals:

EMA: Tim Blubaugh

EPA: Byron Bunker and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused primarily on clarifications of the proposed regulatory language.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 25, 2018

No. 04-18-00183-CR

Cornell Jackie DRUMMER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1991CR1948A

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed an Anders brief in this court. In accordance 

with the law, appointed counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief as well as a motion 

by which appellant could request a copy of the appellate record for purposes of filing his own 

brief. On June 22, 2018, appellant filed his pro se motion for access to the appellate record. In 

that motion, appellant asks this court to provide him with a copy of the appellate record and grant 

him and extension of thirty days from the date he receives the record to file his appellant’s brief. 

After review, we GRANT appellant’s request for a copy of the appellate record and 

ORDER the clerk of this court to send appellant a copy of the appellate record. We advise 

appellant that the appellate record in this case consists of a clerk’s record and two supplemental 

clerk’s records; there is no reporter’s record. In addition, we GRANT appellant’s request for an 

extension of time to file his appellant’s brief and ORDER appellant to file his brief in this court 

on or before August 9, 2018. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel and the pro se 

appellant. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### Blumberger, Appellant, *v.*Nowotavska.

Argued April 14, 1926.

Appeal No. 33, April T., 1926, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Indiana County, September T., 1924, No. 119, in the case of I. Blumberger v. Anna Nowotavska.

Before Porter, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn, Gawthrop and Cunningham, JJ.

Affirmed.

Judgment by confession opened and case tried. Before Langham, P. J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Verdict for defendant on which judgment was entered. Plaintiff appealed.

*Errors assigned*were the various rulings on evidence and the charge of the court.

*John L. Getty,*for appellant.

*E. Walker Smith,*for appellee.

April 30, 1926:

Per Curiam,

This case was tried below with Blumberger v. Bernot, No. 34, April T., 1926, and was argued here with the appeal in that case.

The questions raised are substantially the same, though an additional assignment of error was printed *34in. the brief. It does not require separate discussion.

No assignments of error were filed as required by Rule 60; for that reason, and as stated in the opinion this day filed in Blumberger v. Bemot, (supra) this appeal is dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 12, 2017

No. 04-16-00806-CR

Roger SALDANA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-08-00031-CRF

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s appointed counsel, Mr. Nohl Bryant, filed appellant’s brief on August 21, 

2017.1 The State’s brief was due on October 20, 2017. According to the State, while in the 

process of researching its brief, the State discovered material not previously disclosed to Mr. 

Bryant. Based on the recently obtained material, Mr. Bryant filed a motion requesting ninety

days in which to file an amended appellant’s brief. The State filed a motion asking that the due 

date for its brief be extended to thirty days after appellant’s amended brief is filed. On October 

23, 2017, we issued an order granting in part and denying in part Mr. Bryant’s motion. Our 

order directed Mr. Bryant to file appellant’s amended brief no later than December 8, 2017. Our 

order also stated: “NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED ABSENT 

EXTENTUATING CIRCUMSTANCES.” We also granted the State’s motion and directed

the State to file its appellee’s brief no later than thirty days after appellant’s amended brief is 

filed.

On December 8, 2017, Mr. Bryant filed another request for an extension of time until 

December 22, 2017. The request is GRANTED, and Mr. Bryant is hereby ORDERED to file 

appellant’s amended brief no later than December 22, 2017.

If Mr. Bryant does not file a brief by December 22, 2017, this cause will be abated for the 

trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether: (1) appellant desires to prosecute his 

 

1 Appellant’s brief was originally due on May 22, 2017. Mr. Bryant was granted three extensions of time before 

filing appellant’s brief on August 21, 2017.
appeal; (2) appellant is indigent, and if so, the trial court shall take such measures as may be 

necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may include the appointment of 

new counsel; and (3) counsel has abandoned the appeal. Because sanctions may be necessary, 

the trial court will be asked to address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted 

before the date of the hearing. The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served 

on Mr. Bryant by certified mail, return receipt requested, and by regular United States mail.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
(LOGO)



Attention: Master Servicing
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044

RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1998 fiscal year:

A. I have reviewed the  activities and  performance  of the Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms of  the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these  Officers  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its
duties,  responsibilities  or obligations under these Agreement  throughout such
year, or if there has been a  default or failure of the  servicer to perform any
of such duties, responsibilities or obligation, a description of each default or
failure  and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported  to Norwest  Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

B. I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is  currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

C. I have confirmed  that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
Policy and any other  bonds required under the terms of the Servicing Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Polling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicers Guide
are in full force and effect;

D. All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance  Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged  Property, have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

E. All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any  other  expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on any
Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid, or in any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property,  the reason for the nonpayment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N. A.;

F. All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

G. All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of  Mortgage  Property
required  per section  6050H,   6050J and 6050P of the  Internal  Revenue  Code,
respectively, have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

Edward J. Meekins
Vice President

March 30,1999

Mortgage Loan Department

P.O. Box 268 Superior, Nebraska 68978-0268 * Fax 432-879-4895 * Phone 402
877-4450
#### Gimbel Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6880.

Entry No. 712680/1, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, August 1945, etc.

Certified August 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 26, 1945, etc.

(Decided February 14, 1947)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawbence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importers on entries because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2014395EN.01003701.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2014 — Spraylat v ECHA

(Case T-177/12) (1)

((REACH - Fee for registration of a substance - Reduction granted to micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises - Error in declaration relating to the size of the enterprise - Decision imposing an administrative charge - Proportionality))

(2014/C 395/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Spraylat GmbH (Aachen, Germany) (represented by: K. Fischer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä, A. Iber and C. Schultheiss, Agents, and M. Kuschewsky, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: D. Düsterhaus and E. Manhaeve, and subsequently by B. Eggers and M. Manhaeve, Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of invoice No 10030371 issued by the ECHA on 21 February 2012 setting the amount of the administrative charge imposed on the applicant and a precautionary application to annul Decision SME (2012) 1445 of the ECHA of 15 February 2012 which states that the applicant does not fulfil the conditions to receive a reduction of the fee for small enterprises and imposing an administrative charge on it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Decision SME (2012) 1445 of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) of 15 February 2012 and invoice No 10030371 issued by the ECHA on 21 February 2012; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Decision SME (2012) 1445 of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) of 15 February 2012 and invoice No 10030371 issued by the ECHA on 21 February 2012;

| 2. | Orders the ECHA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Spraylat GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the ECHA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Spraylat GmbH;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.

---
Case No. 5,615.

#### GORDON v. LINDO.

[See Case No. 5,231.]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 40339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19751]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-139-005]


Caprock Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

July 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 17, 1997 Caprock Pipeline Company 
(Caprock) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, to be 
effective August 1, 1997:

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 29A

    Caprock states that this tariff sheet is being filed to adopt, in 
the August 1, 1997 effective sheet, the changes recently approved in 
the Commission's July 2, 1997 letter order in Docket No. RP97-139-003 
incorporating certain Order No. 587 GISB standards to be effective June 
1, 1997.
    Caprock states that copies of the filing were served upon Caprock's 
jurisdictional customers, interested public bodies, and all parties to 
the proceedings.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All protests filed with the Commissions will be considered 
by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not 
serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-19751 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# C_2012243EN.01002402.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/24

---

Action brought on 4 June 2012 — Gamesa Eólica v OHIM — Enercon (horizontal combination of green colours)

(Case T-245/12)

2012/C 243/43

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): Gamesa Eólica, SL (Sarriguren, Spain) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Sanz Cerralbo, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Enercon GmbH (Aurich, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 March 2012 in case R 260/2011-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 March 2012 in case R 260/2011-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark representing a horizontal combination of green colours, for goods in class 7 — Community trade mark registration No 2346542

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The party requesting the declaration of invalidity based its request on Article 52(1)(a) and on Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the Community trade mark invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 62 of the Community trade mark Regulation; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 62 of the Community trade mark Regulation; and

| — | Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

---
|Exhibit
      32.1 | CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                   | PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of
International Smart Sourcing, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, David Hale, Chairman, President, (principal
executive officer) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934: and                                                                                    
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
      by the Report.
|  

/s/David HaleDavid HaleChairman of the Board of Directors, President
      (principalexecutive officer)March 12, 2008


---