alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w21



 





Exhibit 10.21




TERMINATION OF CREDIT AGREEMENT




          This Termination is entered into as of January 10, 2008 by and between First Interstate
BancSystem, Inc., a Montana corporation (the “Borrower”), and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, a national banking association (the “Bank”).




          The Borrower and the Bank are parties to a Credit Agreement dated June 30, 2005, setting forth
the terms on which the Bank may make advances to the Borrower during a period ending June 30, 2008
(the “Existing Credit Agreement”).




          Concurrent with the execution of this Termination, the parties are entering into a separate
Credit Agreement, dated the date hereof, setting forth the terms on which the Lenders (as defined
therein) may make advances to the Borrower (the “New Credit Agreement”). The New Credit Agreement
is intended to supersede the Existing Credit Agreement, and the parties accordingly wish to
terminate their obligations under the Existing Credit Agreement.




          Accordingly, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in the Existing Credit
Agreement, the New Credit Agreement and this Termination, the parties hereby agree as follows:




          1. As used herein, “Effective Time” means the time at which the first advance or other
extension of credit is made under the New Credit Agreement.




          2. As of the Effective Time, the Bank shall have no further obligation to make advances under
the Existing Credit Agreement, and the Borrower shall repay all obligations outstanding under the
Existing Credit Agreement, whether from the proceeds of advances under the New Credit Agreement or
otherwise.




          3. Nothing herein shall terminate any obligation that, by its express terms or by its nature,
survives termination of the Existing Credit Agreement, including but not limited to any
indemnification obligation and any obligation under Section 7.3 (“Costs, Expenses and Attorneys’
Fees”) of the Existing Credit Agreement.




          4. This Termination may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so
executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which counterparts of this
Termination, taken together, shall constitute but one and the same instrument.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year
first above-written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	FIRST INTERSTATE BANCSYSTEM, INC.	 	 	 	WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By

	 	/s/ TERRILL R. MOORE
	 	 	 	By
	 	/s/ CYNTHIA M. SPAGNOLA	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Terrill R. Moore
	 	 	 	 	 	Name: Cynthia M. Spagnola	 	 
	 

	 	Title: Executive Vice
President and Chief

             Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	Title: Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2021 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2021

 To nullify certain regulations regarding the mandatory replacement of 
             certain traffic signs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2011

  Mr. Toomey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To nullify certain regulations regarding the mandatory replacement of 
             certain traffic signs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Intrusive Government Now 
Act of 2011'' or the ``SIGN Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF FEDERAL MANDATES FOR TRAFFIC SIGN 
              RETROREFLECTIVITY.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that it is the responsibility of State 
and local governments to determine whether traffic signs of the State 
and local governments should provide necessary levels of 
retroreflectivity.
    (b) Prohibition on Standard.--The Secretary of Transportation 
(referred to in this Act as the ``Secretary'') shall not promulgate, 
implement, or enforce a minimum retroreflectivity level standard for a 
traffic control device that is applicable to a State or local 
government.
    (c) Modification of Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for 
Streets and Highways.--The Secretary shall modify the Manual on Uniform 
Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2009 Edition 
(incorporated by reference in part 655 of title 23, Code of Federal 
Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this Act)), to 
eliminate--
            (1) the minimum retroreflectivity level standards for 
        traffic control devices contained in section 2A.08 of that 
        Manual; and
            (2) the schedule for the implementation of the standards 
        contained in table I-2 of the Manual.
    (d) Repeal.--Section 406 of the Department of Transportation and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (Public Law 102-388; 106 
Stat. 1564) is amended by striking ``to include--'' and all that 
follows through ``(b) a standard'' and inserting ``to include a 
standard''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE

UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Global-Tech Appliance Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2004 as tiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C.K. Sham,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section I3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John C. K. ShamJohn C. K. ShamPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: September 30 , 2004
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CapLease, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul H. McDowell, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ PAUL H. McDOWELLPaul
      H. McDowellChief
      Executive OfficerMarch
      3, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CapLease, Inc. and will be retained by
CapLease, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.8.1

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                The undersigned, the trustees of Calpine Capital Trust II,
desiring to form a business trust pursuant to Delaware Business Trust Act, 12
Del. C. Section 3810 et seq., hereby certify as follows:

        1.      The name of the business trust being formed hereby (the "Trust")
                is "Calpine Capital Trust II."

        2.      The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust which
                has its principal place of business in the State of Delaware is
                as follows:

                      The Bank of New York (Delaware)
                      White Clay Center, Route 273
                      Newark, Delaware 19711

        3.      This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of the date of
                filing.

Dated:   January __, 2000

                                      Name:
                                      Title: Administrative Trustee


                                      Name:
                                      Title: Administrative Trustee



                                      Name:
                                      Title: Administrative Trustee


                                      THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
                                      as Delaware Trustee


                                      By:
                                         Name:
                                         Authorized Signatory


<PAGE>   2

                                      THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as
                                      Property Trustee


                                      By:
                                         Name:
                                         Authorized Signatory


                                       2
# C_2013046EN.01003306.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/33

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 3 December 2012 — de Bruin v EIT

(Case F-80/12) (1)

1

2013/C 46/72

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 20.10.12, p. 18.

1

---
- 1 -

State of New York

Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to 

revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 65 SSM 7

The People &c.,

 Respondent,

 v.

Kysean Stroud,

 Appellant.

Submitted by Terrence M. Connors, for appellant.

Submitted by Matthew B. Powers, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

A determination of reasonable suspicion is a mixed question of law and fact which 

is beyond our further review if there is legally sufficient record support for the 
- 2 - SSM No. 7

- 2 -

determinations of the courts below (see People v Parker, 32 NY3d 49, 55 [2018]). The 

record contains support for the lower courts’ finding of reasonable suspicion to stop the car 

in which defendant was a passenger (see People v Chestnut, 43 AD2d 260 [3d Dept 1974], 

affd 36 NY2d 971 [1975]). Defendant’s remaining contention lacks merit.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a 

memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Garcia, Singas, and Cannataro concur.

Judge Troutman took no part.

Decided June 14, 2022
No. 47093.

#### Protest 69768-K of F. Schreiber & J. Eisenbach (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the official papers disclosed nothing which would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was held presumptively correct. It further appeared that one entry was not liquidated at the time the protest was filed. The protest as to that entry was held prematurely filed. The protest was dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1990 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1990

 To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply with 
     the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2011

Mr. Lieberman (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Collins, Mr. Burr, Mr. 
  Akaka, Mr. Tester, and Ms. Landrieu) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply with 
     the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AND 
              REEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ACT TO THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY 
              ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 111(d) of the Aviation and Transportation 
Security Act (49 U.S.C. 44935 note; Public Law 107-71) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Notwithstanding'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) General authority.--Except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), and notwithstanding''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Uniformed services employment and reemployment rights 
        act.--In carrying out the functions authorized under paragraph 
        (1), the Under Secretary shall be subject to the provisions set 
        forth in chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 270 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            10254
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         50000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (60254)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (9004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (9004)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (9004)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the China Energy Savings  Technology,  Inc.  amendment to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Sun Li,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906,  another
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to China Energy  Savings  Technology,
Inc. and will be retained by China Energy Savings Technology, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Sun Li
----------------------------------------
Sun Li
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 29, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.3
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
1989 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN  (As Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2005)
 W I T N E S S E T H
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Effective as of January 1, 2006, Section 1. 2(s) of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing
the definition of  Incentive Agreement  used therein with the following new definition
 Incentive Agreement. Section 6.1
   Effective as of January 1, 2006, Section 6.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing the
last sentence of the Section with the following sentence:
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 ATTEST:
    
    
    
    SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:
    
    /s/ PAMELA L. KUNKEMOELLER
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ RICHARD E. CHANDLER, JR.Name:
    
    Pamela L. Kunkemoeller
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Richard E. Chandler, Jr.Title:
    
    Senior Corporate Counsel and
Assistant      Secretary
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and      Secretary
 63
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1730 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1730

To permit Mexican nationals who legally enter the United States with a 
   valid Border Crossing Card through specific ports of entry in New 
       Mexico to remain in southern New Mexico for up to 30 days.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2011

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Udall of New Mexico) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit Mexican nationals who legally enter the United States with a 
   valid Border Crossing Card through specific ports of entry in New 
       Mexico to remain in southern New Mexico for up to 30 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southern New Mexico Economic 
Development Act''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY ADMITTANCE OF MEXICAN NATIONALS WITH BORDER CROSSING 
              CARDS.

    The Secretary of Homeland Security shall permit a national of 
Mexico, who enters the United States with a valid Border Crossing Card 
(as described in section 212.1(c)(1)(i) of title 8, Code of Federal 
Regulations, as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act), 
and who is admitted to the United States at the Columbus, Santa Teresa, 
or Antelope Wells port of entry in New Mexico, to remain in New Mexico 
(within 75 miles of the international border between the United States 
and Mexico) for a period not to exceed 30 days.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015046EN.01000301.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 December 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Azienda sanitaria locale n. 5 ‘Spezzino’, Associazione nazionale pubblica assistenza (ANPAS) — Comitato regionale Liguria, Regione Liguria v San Lorenzo Soc. coop. sociale, Croce Verde Cogema cooperativa sociale Onlus

(Case C-113/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Ambulance services - National legislation reserving ambulance services for public health establishments to registered voluntary associations fulfilling the legal requirements on a preferential basis - Compatibility with EU law - Public procurement - Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU - Directive 2004/18/EC - Mixed services, covered both by Annex II A and Annex II B to Directive 2004/18 - Article 1(2)(a) and (d) - Concept of ‘public service contracts’ - Pecuniary nature - Consideration consisting in the reimbursement of expenses incurred))

(2015/C 046/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Azienda sanitaria locale n. 5 ‘Spezzino’, Associazione nazionale pubblica assistenza (ANPAS) — Comitato regionale Liguria, Regione Liguria

Applicants:

Defendants: San Lorenzo Soc. coop. sociale, Croce Verde Cogema cooperativa sociale Onlus

Defendants:

Intervening parties: Croce Rossa Italiana — Comitato regionale Liguria and Others

Intervening parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that the provision of urgent and emergency ambulance services must be entrusted on a preferential basis and awarded directly, without any advertising, to the voluntary associations covered by the agreements, in so far as the legal and contractual framework in which the activity of those associations is carried out actually contributes to the social purpose and the pursuit of the objectives of the good of the community and budgetary efficiency on which that legislation is based.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 1.6.2013.

1

---
Before the Second Division,

April 28, 1943

No. 48238.

#### Protests 43944-K (B), etc., of J. Elishewitz & Sons Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the protests were sustained as to hemp hats the same as those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) and hemp knotted straw hats similar to those involved in Abstract 46497.