alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32


CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO AND CFO


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the annual report of MDS Inc. (the "Company") filed under cover
      of Form 40-F for the period ended October 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Stephen
      P.
      DeFalco as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Douglas
      S.
      Prince as Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. s.1350, as adopted
      pursuant to s. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his
      knowledge that:








(1)
            
            the
                Report fully complies with the
                requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                Act of
                1934; and(2)
            
            the
                information contained in the
                Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Stephen P. DeFalcoName:
                Stephen P. DeFalcoTitle:
                President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:
      January 29, 2008








/s/
                Douglas S. PrinceName:
                Douglas S. PrinceTitle:
                Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial
                Officer


Date:
      January 29, 2008











This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. D-46.

#### In re Disbarment of Mardian.

It is ordered that Robert Charles Mardian, of Phoenix, Ariz., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Carreker Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending January 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John D. Carreker, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/JOHN D. CARREKER, JR.John D. Carreker, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer |  |               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Dated:                                                                 |  | April 11, 2005

---



QuickLinks
# C_2012331EN.01001302.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/13

---

Appeal brought on 8 August 2012 by Environmental Manufacturing LLP against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 22 May 2012 in Case T-570/10: Environmental Manufacturing LLP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-383/12 P)

(2012/C 331/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Environmental Manufacturing LLP (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, M. Atkins, Solicitor, K. Shadbolt, Trade Mark Attorney)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Société Elmar Wolf

Form of order sought

The appellant seeks the following order:

| 1. | The judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) in Case T-570/10 dated 22 May 2012 shall be set aside and the Court shall give final judgment in the matter. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) in Case T-570/10 dated 22 May 2012 shall be set aside and the Court shall give final judgment in the matter.

| 2. | The Office and intervener shall bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Office and intervener shall bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Following the Court of Justice's judgment in Case C-252/07 Intel Corporation (2008) ECR I-8823, proof that the use of the later mark is or would be detrimental to the distinctive character of the earlier mark requires evidence of a change in the economic behaviour of the average consumer of the goods or services for which the earlier mark was registered consequent on the use of the later mark, or a serious likelihood that such a change will occur in the future. The General Court erroneously did not require such proof, instead concluding that it is sufficient merely if the earlier mark's ability to identify the goods or services for which it is registered and used as coming from the proprietor of that mark is weakened because use of the later mark leads to dispersion of the identity and hold upon the public mind of the earlier mark.

---
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT
      TO




18
      U.S.C. §1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of
Rubicon Minerals Corporation(the
“Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended
December
      31, 2007as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Lewis,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)           
The
      Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(2)           
The
      information contained in this
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.









March
      31,
      2008                                                                
/s/
      "Robert G.
      Lewis"




Robert
      G. Lewis


Chief
      Financial
      Officer







A
      signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rubicon Minerals Corporation and will be
      retained by Rubicon Minerals Corporationand furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Hello,

1. I am Requesting Section 333 Exemption - a grant of exemption in accordance 

with Section 333 AND a civil Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA); this process 

may be used to perform commercial operations in low-risk, controlled environments. 

2. I would like to conduct photography for hire with a small drone. I am a 

commercially rated rotor craft pilot and I am well aware of how to read a sectional chart 

and where I should and should not be flying. I would be flying at altitudes no higher then 

100 feet AGL. I would be doing photography for small events and real estate. Per part 

333 the aircraft weighs less than 55 pounds, operations are conducted during daytime 

Visual Flight Rules (VFR) conditions and within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the pilots, and 

would stay away from airports or heliports.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

LEWIS ALLEN, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 224 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
#### Victoria Majchrzak et al., Plaintiffs v. Richard C. Hagerty, Defendant

Supreme Court, Erie County,

April 18, 1966.

*Moot, Sprague, Marey, Landy & Fernbach (Caesar J. Naples*of counsel), for plaintiffs. *Rosen, Yasinow $ Boberts (Donald North Roberts*of counsel), for defendant.

Reid S. Moule, J.

Victoria Majchrzak sues for damages she claims to have sustained in an accident which occurred on August 31, 1965 at the intersection of Tonawanda Street and *1028Hertel Avenue in the City of Buffalo when she was struck by a car owned and operated by the defendant. Her son, Joseph Mayhart, sues for medical expenses.

The plaintiffs examined the defendant before trial on January 8, 1966, at which time the defendant stated that he had obtained the names of witnesses to the accident but refused to disclose them to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs now seek an order directing the defendant to supply this information.

In support of their application, the plaintiffs state that because of Victoria Majchrzak’s injuries, she was unable to obtain the names of any witnesses to the accident. While this is a conclusion, it is not controverted by the defendant. The plaintiffs also show that an extensive investigation on their part failed to disclose any witnesses to the accident.

The plaintiffs cite the cases of *Rios*v. *Donovan*(21 A D 2d 409) and *Votey*v. *New York City Tr. Auth.,*(46 Misc 2d 554) as authority for their position. However, the *Bios*case did not hold that names of witnesses were a proper item of discovery. It was merely concerned with the procedure to be followed in attempting to obtain such disclosure. The *Votey*case merely followed the rule in *Pistana*v. *Pangburn*(2 A D 2d 643) that the identity of an active participant in the event is a proper item of discovery.

The defendant cites the cases of *Zavaglia*v. *Engert*(23 A D 2d 790), *Kandel*v. *Tocher*(22 A D 2d 513), and *Giamberdino*v. *Mileo*(10 A D 2d 814). The first two cases are not in point since they involve discovery of statements and not names of witnesses. The *Giamberdino*case holds that the names of witnesses need not be disclosed if there is no necessity for the information.

In the case before me it may be impossible for the plaintiffs to prove their case without the testimony of witnesses whose identity is sought. If this is so, can it be said that these names are not material and necessary? I believe that the names of witnesses should be disclosed if their testimony may be necessary to establish what occurred, and the party seeking the disclosure was or is unable, with due diligence, to obtain such information, regardless of whether such party is a plaintiff or a defendant. Certainly the trial of a lawsuit should be more a search for the truth than a game or contest of skill. The plaintiffs’ application is granted.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     I, Michael L. Hirschey state and attest that:

(1)  I am the Chief  Executive  Officer of  OneSource  Technologies,  Inc.  (the
     "issuer").

(2)  Accompanying  this  certification  is the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
     March 31, 2003, a quarterly  report (the  "quarterly  report") filed by the
     issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange  Act"),  which
     contains financial statements.

(3)  I hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
     to  Section  906 of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that  based  on my
     knowledge:

     A.   the periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies
          with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
          and

     B.   the information  contained in the periodic report fairly presents,  in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the issuer for the periods presented therein.


/s/ Michael L. Hirschey
-----------------------
Michael L. Hirschey

Date: 13 May 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of DCI USA, Inc. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 12, 2006                     /s/ Michael Gibbs
                                        -----------------
                                        Michael Gibbs
                                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
009611

Consumer Product Safety Alert

FROM THE U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20207

WA R N I N G : Infants Can Suffo c a t e

In Mesh Drop-Sided Play p e n s

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

(CPSC) warns consumers not to leave the drop side

of mesh-sided playpens down while children are in

them. Playpens used with sides down can present a

suffocation hazard to infants. When the drop side is

down, the mesh net material forms a loose pocket

leaving a gap between the edge of the playpen floor

and the mesh side. Infants can easily fall or roll into

this pocket. Once an infant’s head is entrapped in this

pocket, the infant can suffocate.

In past years, CPSC has received reports of

infants who suffocated between the floor or

mattress and mesh side of the playpen.

The CPSC and members of the Juvenile Products

Manufacturers Association (JPMA) developed a warning label that appears on the saddle cover of the top

rail around mesh-sided playpens which reads:

This warning label has been placed on mesh-sided

playpens with drop sides produced since 1985. A similar warning has appeared on mesh-sided portable

cribs with drop sides produced since 1980.

The drop sides of mesh-sided playpens and portable

cribs should always be up and locked securely in position whenever a child is in the playpen or crib.

WARNING

NEVER LEAVE an infant in playpen with

SIDES DOWN. Infant may roll into space

between mattress and loose mesh side,

causing suffocation.
Exhibit 10.39

UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC.  SUMMARY OF FISCAL 2006 COMPENSATION  FOR DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Director Compensation

Directors who are employees receive no separate compensation for Board service. Non-employee directors will receive the following for their service on
the Board in fiscal 2006:



Non-employee
directors are also eligible to receive stock option awards under the Universal Compression Holdings, Inc.'s Incentive Stock Option Plan.

Executive Officers

The executive officers of the Company serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. From time to time, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
reviews and determines the salaries that are paid to the Company's executive officers. The following are the base salaries for the executive officers effective as of July 4, 2005:

Name

Base SalaryStephen A. Snider, President and Chief Executive Officer

$
500,000Ernie L. Danner, Executive Vice President

$
320,000J. Michael Anderson, Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

$
295,000D. Bradley Childers, Sr. Vice President, Business Development, General Counsel and Secretary

$
275,000Richard Leong, Sr. Vice President, Marketing

$
230,000Kirk E. Townsend, Sr. Vice President

$
300,000


Executive
officers are also eligible to participate in an Officer's Incentive Plan, which provides executive officers with the potential to earn a cash bonus expressed as a percentage of
salary. The Officer's Incentive Plan for fiscal year 2006 has not yet been adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.

The
executive officers are also eligible to participate in the following:



1

---





2

---





QuickLinks
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00526-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.G., et al., Children

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA00461

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the portion of the trial court’s order 

terminating appellant’s parental rights is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial 

court for further proceedings. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed in relation to this appeal 

because appellant qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED January 10, 2018.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
No. 46480.

#### Protests 37218-K, etc., of Burns Lumber Co. (Los Angeles).

*300Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should' have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protests were therefore sustained.
exv10w16



 








Exhibit 10.16




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Employment Agreement (hereafter “Amendment”) is made by and between
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (hereafter “CSI”), and Michael J. Kallok, Ph.D. (hereafter “Kallok”).



     WHEREAS, CSI and Kallok are parties to an existing Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
dated May 31, 2003 (hereafter “Employment Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, CSI and Kallok desire to amend Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that effective as of February 15, 2007, the following
amendments shall be made a part of the Employment Agreement:



     1. Section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement is amended by deleting the current Section 2.1 in
its entirety and replacing it with the following:



     2.1 Employment. Effective as of February 15, 2007, CSI employs Kallok and Kallok accepts
employment as Chief Scientific Officer of CSI. Effective as of the same date, Kallok shall no
longer hold the position of Chief Executive Officer of CSI.



     This Amendment shall be attached to and be a part of the Employment Agreement between CSI and
Kallok.



     Except as set forth herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force without
modification.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.

 	 
	Date: December 19, 2007 	By  	/s/ James E. Flaherty
 	 
	 	 	James E. Flaherty 	 
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 
	 	MICHAEL J. KALLOK, PH.D.

 	 
	Date: December 19, 2007 	By  	/s/ Michael J. Kallok
 	 
	 	 	Michael J. Kallok, Ph.D.
No. 96-7931.

#### Aguilar-Higuerra *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Wachter, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this interim report on Form 10-QSB of FirstBingo.com;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this interim report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this interim report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this interim report.

4.   The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 12th day of August, 2003.



| | /s/ Richard L. Wachter
Richard L. Wachter
President, Principal Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership

/s/ Jerry Pascucci
Jerry Pascucci
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
President and Director

March 28, 2008
Date

---