alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Craig Burton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of USIP.Com, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                         Date: May 17, 2006


                                                         /s/ Craig Burton
                                                      Craig Burton, President/
                                                        Chief Acct. Officer
# C_2013038EN.01003201.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/32

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Bourtembourg v Commission

(Case F-6/12) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Concept of habitual residence - Permanent or habitual centre of interests - Temporary residence for the purpose of study - Place where professional activity is pursued - Fixed term employment relationship)

2013/C 38/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Julien Bourtembourg (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Dony, lawyer)

Applicant: Julien

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and V. Joris, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the Commission’s decision refusing to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 24 May 2011 refusing to grant Mr Bourtembourg the expatriation allowance; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 24 May 2011 refusing to grant Mr Bourtembourg the expatriation allowance;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Bourtembourg. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Bourtembourg.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012, p. 22.

1

---
No. 46482.

#### Protests 15471-K, etc., of Seaboard Lumber Sales Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protests were therefore sustained.
No. 42125.

#### Protests 729059-G, etc., of Del Gaizo Distributing Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
Commander 

United States Coast Guard 

Personnel Service Center 

PSC MS-7200 

4200 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 

Arlington, VA 20598-7200 

Staff Symbol: PSC-c 

Phone: (202) 493-1901 

Fax: (202) 493-1218 

 PSCINST M1427.1 

 01 JUNE 2009 

CG PERSONNEL SERVICE CENTER INSTRUCTION M1427.1 

Subj: REGISTER OF OFFICERS 

1. PURPOSE. This manual promulgates the Active Duty Promotion List of Coast Guard 

officers and a listing of other active duty and retired officers. 

2. ACTION. Area, district, and sector commanders; commanders of maintenance and logistics 

commands; Commander, Deployable Operations Group; commanding officers of 

headquarters units; assistant commandants for directorates, Judge Advocate General and 

special staff elements at Headquarters must ensure compliance with the provisions of this 

manual. Internet release is authorized. 

3. DIRECTIVES AFFECTED. Register of Officers, COMDTINST M1427.1AC, is canceled. 

4. EFFECTIVE DATE OF INFORMATION. The information contained in this manual reflects 

the status of the officer corps on 1 January 2009, unless otherwise noted. 

5. AVAILABILITY. An electronic version will be located on the internet at 

http://www.uscg.mil/psc/opm/Opm1/opm-1Register.asp and on the intranet at CGCENTRAL 

(Once in CG-Central, use the path > My Workspace > Career Management > Officer > 

Promotions). Paper copies will not be distributed. 

6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT AND IMPACT CONSIDERATIONS. Environmental 

considerations were examined in the development of this manual and have been determined 

to be not applicable. 

7. FORMS/REPORTS. None 

 D. A. NEPTUN /S/ 

 Rear Admiral, U. S. Coast Guard 

 Commander, Personnel Service Center 

 NON-STANDARD DISTRIBUTION: Available on CG INTRANET via CG Central
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John A. Rogers, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of MDS Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 4, 2004 | /s/ John A. Rogers(John A. Rogers)President & Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2015198EN.01000801.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Karoline Gruber v Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat für Kärnten, EMA Beratungs- und Handels GmbH, Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend

(Case C-570/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Directive 2011/92/EU - Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment - Construction of a retail park - Binding effect of an administrative decision not to carry out an environmental impact assessment - No public participation))

(2015/C 198/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Karoline Gruber

Applicant:

Defendants: Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat für Kärnten, EMA Beratungs- und Handels GmbH, Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11 of Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, pursuant to which an administrative decision declaring that a particular project does not require an environmental impact assessment, which is binding on neighbours who were precluded from bringing an action against that administrative decision, where those neighbours, who are part of the ‘public concerned’ within the meaning of Article 1(2) of that directive, satisfy the criteria laid down by national law concerning ‘sufficient interest’ or ‘impairment of a right’. It is for the referring court to verify whether that condition is fulfilled in the case before it. Where it is so fulfilled, that court must hold that the administrative decision not to carry out such an assessment is not binding on those neighbours.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
# C_2015089EN.01001701.xml

| 16.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2015 — Evonik Degussa GmbH v Commission

(Case T-341/12) (1)

1

((Competition - Administrative procedure - European hydrogen peroxide and perborate market - Publication of a decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Rejection of a request for confidential treatment of information given to the Commission pursuant to the latter’s Leniency Notice - Obligation to state reasons - Confidentiality - Professional secrecy - Legitimate expectations))

(2015/C 089/17)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evonik Degussa GmbH (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Steinle, M. Holm-Hadulla and C. von Köckritz, avocats)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, M. Kellerbauer and G. Meessen, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 3534 final of 24 May 2012 refusing Evonik Degussa’s request for confidential treatment under Article 8 of Decision 2011/695/EU of the President of the European Commission of 13 October 2011 on the function and terms of reference of the hearing officer in certain competition proceedings (Case COMP/F/38.620 — Hydrogen Peroxide and Perborate).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Evonik Degussa GmbH to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evonik Degussa GmbH to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.

1

---
No. 74-899.

#### LeFaivre et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Mannatech, Incorporated

This certification is
provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Mannatech, Incorporated (the
Issuer).

I, Stephen D. Fenstermacher, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that
to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 16, 2006



/s/ Stephen D. FenstermacherStephen D. FenstermacherChief Financial Officer


Subscribed and sworn to before me

This 16thday of March , 2006



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Christina Dutton                
|Name: Christina Dutton              
|Title: Notary Public, State of Texas

My commission expires: March 19, 2010

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mannatech, Incorporated

and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)



1
# C_2014175EN.01001501.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/15

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 February 2014 — Gabi Thesing and Bloomberg Finance LP v European Central Bank (ECB)

(Case C-28/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 169(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Content required in the application initiating an appeal))

2014/C 175/17

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Gabi Thesing, Bloomberg Finance LP (represented by: M. Stephens and R. Lands, Solicitors, and by T. Pitt-Payne QC)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (represented by: M. López Torres and S. Lambrinoc, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of 29 November 2012 in Case T-590/10 Gabi Thesing and Bloomberg Finance LP v European Central Bank (ECB), by which the General Court (Seventh Chamber) dismissed an action for annulment of the decision of the European Central Bank of 21 October 2010 refusing to grant the appellants access to two documents concerning public debt and the budgetary deficit

Gabi Thesing and Bloomberg Finance LP

European Central Bank (ECB)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Gabi Thesing and Bloomberg Finance LP are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Gabi Thesing and Bloomberg Finance LP are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6. 4. 2013.

1

---
April 7, 1949

No. 7694.

#### Jor*dan Marsh Co.*v. *United States.*

Entered at Boston, Mass. Reap. Dec. 7662. Motion by appellant.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

(PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John A. Rogers, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of MDS Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 17, 2005 | /s/ John A. Rogers(John A. Rogers)President & Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas M. Sheppard, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of FirstBingo.com;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and

3.  	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. 	The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) 	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. 	The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) 	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6. 	The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 14th day of May, 2004.



| | /s/ Thomas Sheppard
Thomas M. Sheppard 
Secretary, Principal Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---