alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 3107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-979]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 24, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 3107]]



COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Florida Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference 
call of the Florida Advisory Committee will convene at 2 p.m. EST and 
adjourn at 4 p.m. EST on Tuesday, February 13, 2007. The purpose of the 
conference call is to discuss plans for the Committee's upcoming 
briefing to be held in April 2007 on religious freedom for prisoners 
and the restoration of their voting rights.
    This conference call is available to the public through the 
following call-in number: 866-393-1381. Any interested member of the 
public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can 
expect to incur charges for calls not initiated using the supplied 
call-in number or over wireless lines and the Commission will not 
refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls 
using the call-in number over land-line connections. Persons with 
hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling 
the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service 
with the conference call number.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting Peter 
Minarik, Southern Regional Office, at 404-562-7000, by Tuesday, 
February 6, 2007.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, January 19, 2007.
Ivy L. Davis,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit
 [FR Doc. E7-979 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Frank, McCl anahan and Senior Judge Willis

BARBARA D. BOYD MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1355-06-2 PER CURIAM NOVEMBER 21, 2006 VIRGINIA EMPLOYM ENT COMMISSION

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND T.J. Markow, Judge (Barbara D. Boyd, pro se , on briefs). (Robert F. McDonnell, Attorn ey General; Elizabeth B. Peay, Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Barbara D. Boyd appeals a deci sion of the Circuit Court of th e City of Richmond affirming the decision of the Virginia Employment Comm ission (VEC) finding Bo yd disqualified for unemployment compensation because she left work voluntarily without good caus e. The circuit court rejected Boyd’s argument th at the VEC’s decision should be reversed because the VEC committed intrinsic fraud by failing to provide Boyd with a fair hear ing. We have reviewed the

record and the circuit court’s decision and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we

affirm the circuit court’s decision for the re asons set forth in its March 27, 2006 opinion and order. We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma terials before the Cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 1

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 The VEC’s motion to dismiss is denied.
PUBLIC LAW 111–99—NOV. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 3011 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 955: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Mar. 17, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–99 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10355 

Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, Washington, as the ‘‘John ‘Bud’ Hawk 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN ‘‘BUD’’ HAWK POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, 

Washington, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John ‘Bud’ 

Hawk Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John ‘Bud’ Hawk Post Office’’. 

Approved November 30, 2009. 

Nov. 30, 2009 

[H.R. 955] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
No. 74-1013.

#### Orient Mid-East Lines, Inc., et al. *v.*A Shipment of Rice Now or Lately on Board the Orient Transporter et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order entered May 2 1 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00247

- CV

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ME DICAL CENTER, EDMUND SANCHEZ, M.D. AND SRINATH CHINNAKOTLA, M.D., Appellant s

V.

HAROLD BIGGS, INDIVI DUALLY AND AS EXECUT OR O F THE ESTATE OF
CHERI JEAN WELLS BIG GS, DECEASED, BRANDE N WELLS AND CHER BIG GS, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 05

- 11989



### O RDER

W e REINSTATE this appeal which was abated for settlem ent purposes

. Because the

Court has been informed the parties did not settle and only the clerk’s record has been filed, we

ORDER court reporter Vielica Dobbins to file the reporter’s record no later than June 20, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS

JUS TICE
# C_2012319EN.01001802.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/18

---

Action brought on 26 July 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-79/12)

2012/C 319/33

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Duvekot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decisions to dismiss the applicant from his functions and to reduce the amount of his pension following disciplinary proceedings brought finding an infringement of Article 11 of the Staff Regulations

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions of 29 September 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of 29 September 2011;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

M. DENISE TOLLIVER,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellant,

v.

QLARANT QUALITY 

SOLUTIONS, INC., RONALD G. 

FORSYTHE, JR., and DEBORAH 

KELLER,

Defendants Below,

Appellees.

§

§ No. 458, 2022

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. K21-06-040

§ 

§ 

§

§ 

§

§ 

§

Submitted: March 24, 2023

 Decided: May 19, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and record on appeal,1 we conclude 

that the Superior Court’s November 21, 2022 opinion dismissing the complaint and 

December 12, 2022 order denying the untimely motion for reconsideration should 

be affirmed. Even assuming that responses to her complaint were due by July 19, 

2021 as Tolliver contends, she has not shown that the Superior Court abused its 

1 The Court has not considered documents submitted by the plaintiff below-appellant M. Denise 

Tolliver after briefing was complete. The documents were not available to the Superior Court in 

the first instance and are outside of the record on appeal. Delaware Elec. Coop., Inc. v. Duphily, 

703 A.2d 1202, 1206 (Del.1997) (stating that “[i]t is a basic tenet of appellate practice that an 

appellate court reviews only matters considered in the first instance by a trial court” and striking 

materials from appendix that were outside of record on appeal).
2

discretion in denying her motion for default judgment. The defendants belowappellees timely removed the action to the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware on July 21, 2021 and obtained an extension from the district 

court to file their response to the complaint. Within two days of the docketing of the 

district court’s opinion and order remanding the matter in the Superior Court, the 

defendants filed a proposed briefing schedule for renewal of the motion to dismiss 

they had filed in the district court. Given these circumstances and the strong policy 

favoring a decision on the merits over entry of default judgment, the Superior Court 

did not abuse its discretion in denying Tolliver’s motion for default judgment. Nor 

did the Superior Court err in concluding that Tolliver’s complaint failed to establish 

that defendant below-appellee Deborah Keller was subject to personal jurisdiction 

in Delaware2 and failed to state a claim against defendant-below appellee QLarant 

Quality Solutions, Inc. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice

2 Tolliver does not challenge the Superior Court’s holding that defendant below-appellee Ronald 

G. Forsythe, Jr. was not subject to personal jurisdiction in Delaware.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sino Clean Energy Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.





Dated: May 16, 2011By:
/s/ Baowen RenBaowen RenChief Executive OfficerDated: May 16, 2011By:
/s/ Wen (Wendy) FuWen (Wendy) FuChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9649]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 4, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Audrey G. Savage, Monticello, Iowa; to acquire control of Family 
Merchants Bancorporation, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and thereby indirectly 
acquire control of Family Merchants Bank, Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 15, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-9649 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Jingan Wang, certify that:
1. I have reviewed the small business issuer's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 (this "report");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;
5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:  November 13, 2006
By:  /s/ Jingan Wang            -------------------------------Jingan Wang
Chief Executive Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00020-CR

BERT GRIFFIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 367th District Court

of Denton County (F16-2045-367)

January 14, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
(Reap. Dec. 9099)

#### R. G. Hobelmann & Co., Inc., Agents *v.*United States

Entry No. 3419, etc.

(Decided March 19, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and *736after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the records in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Troop Support sweeps gingerbread house decorating competition 

By Nancy Benecki

                DLA Troop Support Public Affairs  –              
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support swept the winner’s circle in the annual 2019 Naval Support Activity Philadelphia Morale, Welfare and Recreation’s gingerbread house decorating competition. First place went to Diana Parry from the Industrial Hardware supply chain, who turned Building 6 into a winter wonderland with tools. Second place went to Sergio Airapetian of the Subsistence supply chain for his house that featured Santa on the roof with a laptop computer. Third place went to Terry Donahue of the Clothing and Textiles supply chain for his C&T workshop gingerbread house. 

Entries were judged on holiday spirit, creativity, technique and difficulty, according to the MWR. Themes had to be based on the command where the entrant works. The competition ended on Dec. 13.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
``

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
 of ComCam, Inc. (Registrant) for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
 and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Don Gilbreath, chief executive officer and
 chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section
 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents,
 in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by
 this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Don Gilbreath

Don Gilbreath

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant
 to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
 Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
 Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
 before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained
 in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required
 by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to
 the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.