alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,680,000                       0
<SECURITIES>                                   356,000                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,225,000                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,541,000                       0
<PP&E>                                          76,000                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,000)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,838,000                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          650,000                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         3,000                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,185,000                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,838,000                       0
<SALES>                                      4,622,000               3,136,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,622,000               3,136,000
<CGS>                                        5,475,000               3,369,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,475,000               3,369,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,000                  26,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (853,000)               (151,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                (45,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (853,000)               (106,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (853,000)               (106,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25                  (0.04)


</TABLE>
1 **GOOD NEIGHBOR ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD** 

### Good Neighbor Environmental Board Meeting

**Brownsville, TX July 24** 

**– 25, 2007**  **Location: Cancun B Room, T**  **he Holiday Inn**

**– Brownsville**  **3777 North Expressway , Brownsville, TX** 



### AGENDA **DAY 1**

**– July 24, 2007**  **8:0 0 a.m.**  **Registr ation**  **8:3 0**  **a.m. Meeting Begins: Welcome and Introductions** 

- Paul Ganster, Chair, Good Neighbor Environmental Board

- Elaine Koerner , Designated Federal Officer **Opening Remarks**

- Hon. Pat M. Ahumada, Jr., Brownsville May or

- Hon. Carlos H. Cascos, CPA, Cameron County Judge **9 :00**  **a.m.** Carlos Marin, Commissioner, International B oundary and W ater Commission, U.S. Section **9: 45 a.m.**  Godfrey

Garza, Manager, Hidalgo Count y Floodplain and Drainage System **10:30 a.m.**  **Break 10:**  **45 a.m.** Jorge Jalomo , Regiona l Liaison Officer, Texas Department of Public Safety **11:30 a.m.** Bry an Winton, Refuge Manager, Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife

Refuge , U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service , Department of the Interior **12: 15 p.**  **m. Lunch**  **2:00 p.m. Public Comment S**  **ection 2:30 p**  **.m.** Brian Smith, M.D., M.P.H., Regional Medical Director, Texas Department of

State Health Services **3: 15 p.m.**  **Break**2

**3:30 p.m.**  José Manuel Pérez **,** Pronatura Noreste A. C., Programa de R estauración **4:15 p.m.** Mónica González **,** President, and Roberto Mattus, Executive Director, Matamoros

Maquil adora Association **5:00 p.m. Additional Business**  **5:30 p.m. Day One Ends** 
**###**3 **GOOD NEIGHBOR ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD** 

### Good Neighbor Environmental Board Meeting

**Brownsville, T X**  **July 24 -**  **25, 2007 Business Meeting**  **DAY 2**

**– July 25, 2007**  **7:30 a.m. Registration**  **8:00 a.m. Welcome**  **8: 0**  **5 a.m.**  **Discussion and Approval of Minutes from last meeting 8**  **:30 a.m**
. **Board Member Report -**  **Outs 9:30**  **a.m. Break**  **9:45 a.m.**  **Eleven th Report Preparations and Next Steps**  **10:45 a.m.**  **Development of List for CEQ of Possible 12 th**  **Report Themes 11:45 a.m.**  **Status of Las Cruces Meeting Planning 12:00**  **p.m. Meeting**  **Adjourns**
###
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28945-28946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Rural Development; Notice of Privatization of the National Sheep 
Industry Improvement Center

AGENCY: Rural Development, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Agriculture approved the Transition Plan to 
privatize the National Sheep Industry Improvement Center. The American 
Sheep and Goat Center, a Utah non-profit corporation, became the 
successor to the National Sheep Industry Improvement Center on October 
1, 2006.

DATES: Privatization was effective Midnight, September 30, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas C. Dorr, Under Secretary, USDA 
Rural Development, Room 205-W, Mail Stop 0107, 1400 Independence Avenue 
SW., Washington, DC 20250-0107, telephone: 202-720-4581, TTY: 800-877-
8339 (Federal Information Relay Service).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 28946]]

Background

    Section 375 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, 7 
U.S.C. 2008j, created the National Sheep Industry Improvement Center 
(NSIIC) to strengthen the infrastructure of the sheep and goat 
industry. The NSIIC provided loans and grants for business ventures 
where normal commercial credit or funding was not available. Section 
375(j) of the Farm Bill legislation required the privatization of the 
NSIIC to occur on the earlier of its receiving a certain level of 
Federal funding or September 30, 2006. The legislation required a 
transition plan, to be approved by the Secretary of Agriculture, that 
provides for a private successor entity that would have the same 
purposes and be able to continue the activities of the NSIIC. The 
Secretary of Agriculture has approved a privatization plan that was 
triggered by the September 30, 2006 deadline. The NSIIC ceased 
operations on September 30, 2006. The American Sheep and Goat Center 
became the successor private organization on October 1, 2006. All 
assets and liabilities of the NSIIC have now been transferred to the 
private American Sheep and Goat Center. The transition plan is 
completed as of May 23, 2007.

    Dated: May 16, 2007.
Douglas Faulkner,
Acting Under Secretary, Rural Development.
 [FR Doc. E7-9932 Filed 5-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P
Exhibit 10.14


 


October 22, 2007


 


 


Paul Hollerbach

11 El Campanero

Orinda, CA 94563


 


Dear Paul,


 


On behalf of everyone here at Current Media LLC, I am very pleased to
offer you the position of Chief Financial Officer, reporting to me, with a
start date of October 29, 2007.  As
discussed, here are some details of your employment.


 


This is a full-time, regular, exempt position.  The compensation is a semi-monthly salary of
$12,500 per pay period, which works out to $300,000 on an annualized
basis.  In addition, you will be eligible
to receive an annual bonus of $100,000, less all required withholdings and
taxes, if you achieve mutually agreed upon benchmarks to be proposed by you.


 


You will be granted 190,000 shares of non-voting common stock as soon
as practicable after the commencement of your employment, with 50,000 of those
shares vesting in one installment on the first anniversary of your employment;
60,000 shares vesting in equal monthly installments in the second year of your
employment; and 80,000 shares vesting in equal monthly installments in the
third year of your employment.  The stock
grant shall be governed by the terms of your share award agreement and the
Company’s equity incentive plan; however the vesting arrangement shall be
consistent with the terms outlined in this letter.  Should the Company experience a Change in
Control, the vesting of any unvested equity grants will be accelerated so that,
upon the occurrence of the Change in Control, you will be vested in the number
of shares that would otherwise have vested in the twelve month period following
the Change in Control.


 


Current offers employees 10 company-paid holidays per year.  You will be eligible to join Current’s health
and welfare benefits plan on the first day of the month following thirty days
of employment, and you may join our 401(k) plan on a quarterly basis
beginning January 1, 2008.  What’s
more, Current will match 50 cents of every dollar that you invest in your 401(k) up
to 6% of your annual salary.


 


Please note that this offer is contingent upon your acceptance by
signing below, and also upon verification of your identity and employment
eligibility.  Should you decide to accept
our offer, you would be an at-will employee of Current, which means that either
party may terminate the relationship at any time, for any lawful reason.  As a Current employee you would naturally be
expected to comply with our policies and procedures as modified from time to
time.


 

















 


We are very excited to have you join us and to be working with you to transform
and democratize television.  To accept
our offer, please send your signed letter via our confidential fax:
415-995-8273.   lf you have questions
before you start, please contact me our HR Manager, Kim Vaccaro at 415-995-8272
or kvaccaro@currentmedia.com.


 


Sincerely,


 


 


	
  /s/ Joel Hyatt

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  Accepted:

  
	
  /s/ Paul Hollerbach
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ LOPEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72489

Agency No. A074-804-492

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Samuel Rodriguez Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen,

FILED

JUL 30 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72489

Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez Lopez’s motion

to reopen as untimely because he filed the motion almost eight years after the

BIA’s January 31, 2000, order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Rodriguez Lopez

failed to establish that he acted with the due diligence required for equitable

tolling, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897; cf. Ghahremani v. Gonzales, 498 F.3d

993, 1000 (9th Cir. 2007).

In light of our disposition, we do not reach Rodriguez Lopez’s remaining

contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2013026EN.01006302.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/63

---

Action brought on 19 November 2012 — Compagnie des montres Longines, Francillon v OHIM — Cheng (B)

(Case T-505/12)

2013/C 26/125

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Compagnie des montres Longines, Francillon SA (Saint-Imier, Switzerland) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Xiuxiu Cheng (Budapest, Hungary)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 September 2012 in case R 193/2012-5; and. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 September 2012 in case R 193/2012-5; and.

| — | Order the Defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in black and white ‘B’, for goods in classes 9 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 8483562

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: International trade mark registration No 401319 of the figurative mark representing a device of extended wings with a geometric design in the middle, for goods in classes 7, 9 and 14

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 48218.

#### Protests 80931-K, etc., of American Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with the court’s finding that the oilcans are similar to those involved in Abstract 40863 they were held dutiable as hollow ware at 40 percent under paragraph 339, and tape measures similar to those involved in Abstract 43372 were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339. Protests sustained to that extent.
No. 74-6010.

#### Black et al. *v.*Hanrahan et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132116 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132116 COA: 261514 Oakland CC: 03-190712-FH RICARDO ALEXANDER BUCCILLI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
No. 54397.

#### American & Far East Trading Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 113387-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shells, not manufactured or advanced in value, the same as the articles the subject of Abstracts 50357 and 53093, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1738 was sustained.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2003 

To clarify that an authorization to use military force, a declaration of war, 

or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention without charge 

or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2011 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEE, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, 

Mr. KIRK, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. PAUL, Mr. COONS, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

NELSON of Florida, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. 

FRANKEN, and Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify that an authorization to use military force, a 

declaration of war, or any similar authority shall not 

authorize the detention without charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Due Process Guar5 antee Act of 2011’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2003 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE INDEFINITE DETENTION OF 

2 CITIZENS AND LAWFUL PERMANENT RESI3 DENTS. 

4 Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub7 section (c); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(b)(1) An authorization to use military force, a dec11 laration of war, or any similar authority shall not author12 ize the detention without charge or trial of a citizen or 

13 lawful permanent resident of the United States appre14 hended in the United States, unless an Act of Congress 

15 expressly authorizes such detention. 

16 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) applies to an authorization to use 

17 military force, a declaration of war, or any similar author18 ity enacted before, on, or after the date of the enactment 

19 of the Due Process Guarantee Act of 2011.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

GREGORY FRANK SPEROW,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 56570

D.C. No. 2:18

- cv

- 01186

- VAP

- JEM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

GREGORY FRANK SPEROW,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 30035

D.C. No. 1:06

- cr

- 00126

- BLW

- 2

MEMORANDUM

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

FEB 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 56570 & 19

- 30035 Submitted February 4, 2020 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

In Appeal No. 18

- 56570

, Gregory Frank Sperow appeal ed from t he district

court ’s dismissal of his motion for return of property under Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure 41( g )

. In his reply brief, however, he requested to withdraw

the appeal. We treat this request as a motion for voluntary dismissal. So treated,

the motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).

In Appeal No. 19

- 300 35

, Sperow challenges the district court’s final order of

forfeiture for the Mount Pleasant property

. The government contends that this

appeal is barred by a valid appeal waive r. We review de novo whether a defendant

has waived his right to appeal

. S ee United States v. Harris , 628 F.3d 1203, 1205

(9th Cir. 2011)

. The terms of the appeal waiver in Sperow’s plea agreement

unambiguously encompass the claims raised in this appeal. See id

. The record

belies Sperow’s contention s that the district cour t modif ied the terms of his plea

agreeme nt to exclude the Mount Pleasant property from forfeiture and that the

gover nment breached the plea agreement

. The record further belies Sperow’s

contention that he “provided complete and truthful cooperation ” sufficient to

trigger the government’s obligation not to seek final forfeiture of the Mount

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).3 18

- 56570 & 19

- 30035

Pleasant property to the exte nt it was obtained through legitimate means

.

A ccordingly, we do not reach the merits of Sperow’s challenge to the district

court’s final order of forfeiture, but instead dismiss pursuant to the valid waiver

.

See id. at 120 7.

Appeal Nos. 18

- 56570 & 19

- 30055: DISMISSED

.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bytewatch Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Plotnikoff, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  By:
/s/Richard Plotnikoff

Richard PlotnikoffChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer Dated:
August 22, 2005
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-120213) pertaining to the Radiation TherapyServices, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan and the Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated February 14, 2005, except for Notes 2, 3, 6, 8, 10 and 18 as to which the date is May 10, 2005,with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

Certified Public Accountants 

Tampa, Florida 

May 10, 2005