alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1   Bingham Canyon Corporation  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Bingham Canyon Corporation certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bingham Canyon Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bingham Canyon Corporation. Date: November 7, 2008/s/ Brett D. Mayer
Brett D. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
# C_2013055EN.01001701.xml

| 23.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/17

---

Action brought on 18 December 2012 — Mikhalchanka v Council

(Case T-542/12)

2013/C 55/30

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aliaksei Mikhalchanka (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, insofar as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, insofar as it concerns the applicant;

| — | Annul Council Regulation (EU) NO 1041/2012 of 6 November 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, insofar as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Regulation (EU) NO 1041/2012 of 6 November 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, insofar as it concerns the applicant;

| — | Annul Council Implementing Regulation No 1017/2012 of 6 November 2012 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, insofar as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Implementing Regulation No 1017/2012 of 6 November 2012 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, insofar as it concerns the applicant;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-196/11 AX v Council. (1)

AX

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ 2012 C 165, p. 19.

1

---
#### Air Express International Agency, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6550.

Entry No. 727025, etc.

Invoices dated Arbroath, Scotland, August 5, 1941, etc

Certified August 6, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 27, 1941, etc.

(Decided November 25, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. D-1736.

#### In re Disbarment of Du Bois.

Elliott L. Du Bois, of Chicago, Ill., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Alan L. Wells, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Alan L. Wells                                                                                                
|                       |  |  |  | Alan L. Wells President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.



37
# C_2015311EN.01000601.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-653/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 2006/12/EC - Articles 4 and 5 - Waste management - Region of Campania - Judgment of the Court - Finding of a failure to fulfil obligations - Failure to comply in full with a judgment of the Court - Article 260(2) TFEU - Financial penalties - Penalty payment - Lump sum payment))

(2015/C 311/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and E. Sanfrutos Cano, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by S. Fiorentino, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | declares that, by failing to adopt all the measures necessary to comply with the judgment in Commission v Italy (C-297/08, EU:C:2010:115), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU, |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that, by failing to adopt all the measures necessary to comply with the judgment in Commission v Italy (C-297/08, EU:C:2010:115), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU,

| 2. | orders the Italian Republic to pay the European Commission, into the account ‘European Union own resources’, a penalty payment of EUR 1 20  000 for each day of delay in adopting the measures necessary to ensure compliance with the judgment in Commission v Italy (C-297/08, EU:C:2010:115), from the day of delivery of the judgment in the present case until the day on which the judgment in Commission v Italy (C-297/08, EU:C:2010:115) is complied with, |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Italian Republic to pay the European Commission, into the account ‘European Union own resources’, a penalty payment of EUR 1 20  000 for each day of delay in adopting the measures necessary to ensure compliance with the judgment in Commission v Italy (C-297/08, EU:C:2010:115), from the day of delivery of the judgment in the present case until the day on which the judgment in Commission v Italy (C-297/08, EU:C:2010:115) is complied with,

| 3. | orders the Italian Republic to pay the European Commission a lump sum, into the account ‘European Union own resources’, of EUR 20 million, |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders the Italian Republic to pay the European Commission a lump sum, into the account ‘European Union own resources’, of EUR 20 million,

| 4. | orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 93, 29.3.2014.

1

---
No. 39220.

#### Protest 697592-G of Nippon Dry Goods Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with the report of the appraiser the place cards in question were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1410 *376as claimed. It was stipulated that the artificial tortoise in shell is the same as the merchandise passed upon in Abstract 29981. The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1538 was therefore sustained.
No. 39167.

#### Protest 64668-G of John Wanamaker (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 37230 materials and articles in chief value of cellulose filaments were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31. Embroidered all-overs and articles in part of braid, lace, or trimming were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. *United States*v. *Smith*(12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and *Glemby’s*v. *United States*(13 id. 533, T. D. 41397) followed.
# C_2012227EN.01002801.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/28

---

Action brought on 4 June 2012 — Versalis v Commission

(Case T-241/12)

2012/C 227/48

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Versalis SpA (San Donato Milanese, Italy) (represented by: F. Moretti, L. Nascimbene and M. Siragusa, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant submits that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested measure by which the Commission held that the necessary conditions were present for reopening the procedure for imposing a penalty on Versalis SpA and Eni SpA, and order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested measure by which the Commission held that the necessary conditions were present for reopening the procedure for imposing a penalty on Versalis SpA and Eni SpA, and order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action has been brought against the decision allegedly contained in the letter from the European Commission of 23 April 2012 (D/2012/042050, entitled: COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber — Re-adoption) by which Versalis SpA was informed of the Commission’s decision to proceed with the adoption of a new statement of objections and a new infringement decision which will impose a fine on that company, in connection with Procedure COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber. That letter follows on from the judgment of 13 July 2011 in Case T-59/07, by which the General Court annulled the part of the infringement decision concerning the charge against the applicant — and, jointly and severally with that company, against Eni — relating to the aggravating circumstance of repeat infringements, leading to a recalculation of the fine imposed.

Butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber — Re-adoption

Butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber

In support of its action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.

By its first and only plea, the applicant alleges that the Commission lacked competence to reopen the procedure for imposing a penalty on it with a view to the adoption of the new infringement decision. In particular, the applicant maintains that the Commission’s power to impose penalties on Versalis SpA in connection with the subject-matter of Procedure COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber came to an end following the adoption of the decision of 29 November 2006 (Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final), as annulled and altered by the General Court of the European Union in its judgment of 13 July 2011 in Case T-59/07, at present under appeal before the Court of Justice.

Butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Craig A. Knock, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 1, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Craig A. Knock                                                                                                       
|                     |  |  |  | Craig A. Knock                                                                                                           
|                     |  |  |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Principal Accounting Officer Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc.
# C_2014315EN.01004504.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/45

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 July 2014 — European Commission v Council of the European Union: interveners: European Parliament, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-248/13) (1)

1

2014/C 315/75

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.

1

---
No. 96-7556.

#### Russell *v.*Robertson County, Tennessee, et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2012273EN.01002101.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/21

---

Action brought on 13 July 2012 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Radiators for heating)

(Case T-315/12)

2012/C 273/35

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tubes Radiatori Srl (Resana, Italy) (represented by: S. Verea, K. Muraro and M. Balestriero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Antrax It Srl (Resana, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2012 in Case R 953/2011-3 and, thereby, declare that Community design No 000 169 370-0002 owned by TUBES RADIATORI Srl is valid, in so far as it is new and has individual character; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2012 in Case R 953/2011-3 and, thereby, declare that Community design No 000 169 370-0002 owned by TUBES RADIATORI Srl is valid, in so far as it is new and has individual character;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs, in accordance with Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the Eurpopean Communities of 2 May 1991. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs, in accordance with Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the Eurpopean Communities of 2 May 1991.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Radiators for heating — Community design No 169 370-0002

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: the applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Antrax It Srl

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Breach of Articles 4 and 9 of the Regulation on Community designs (CDR), in particular the ground for invalidity referred to in Article 25(1)(b) CDR, on the basis of lack of individual character for the purpose of Article 6(1)(b) CDR

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the Community design invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Articles 4, 5 and 6 of Regulation No 6/2002

Pleas in law:

---
### Terrestrial lidar datasets of New Orleans, Louisiana, levee failures from Hurricane Katrina, August 29, 2005

By: Brian D. CollinsRobert KayenDiane L. MinasianThomas Reiss

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds470

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Hurricane Katrina made landfall with the northern Gulf Coast on August 29, 2005, as one of the strongest hurricanes on record. The storm damage incurred in Louisiana included a number of levee failures that led to the inundation of approximately 85 percent of the metropolitan New Orleans area. Whereas extreme levels of storm damage were expected from such an event, the catastrophic failure of the New Orleans levees prompted a quick mobilization of engineering experts to assess why and how particular levees failed. As part of this mobilization, civil engineering members of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) performed terrestrial lidar topographic surveys at major levee failures in the New Orleans area. The focus of the terrestrial lidar effort was to obtain precise measurements of the ground surface to map soil displacements at each levee site, the nonuniformity of levee height freeboard, depth of erosion where scour occurred, and distress in structures at incipient failure. In total, we investigated eight sites in the New Orleans region, including both earth and concrete floodwall levee breaks. The datasets extend from the 17th Street Canal in the Orleans East Bank area to the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) with the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MRGO) in the New Orleans East area. The lidar scan data consists of electronic files containing millions of surveyed points. These points characterize the topography of each levee’s postfailure or incipient condition and are available for download through online hyperlinks. The data serve as a permanent archive of the catastrophic damage of Hurricane Katrina on the levee systems of New Orleans. Complete details of the data collection, processing, and georeferencing methodologies are provided in this report to assist in the visualization and analysis of the data by future users.

#### Study Area
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Troop Support Construction and Equipment’s Culture Improvement Team celebrates the holidays

By Nancy Benecki

                DLA Troop Support  –              
The holiday season is here, and with that goes the many ways that the workforce comes together to show appreciation for each other and what we do all year. The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Construction and Equipment supply chain’s Culture Improvement Team held its annual holiday luncheon on Dec. 5, where team members celebrated the end of the year with a festive lunch. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Defense Logistics AgencyDLA Troop Supportholidaysculture improvement team