alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 18, 2014                              |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                |   |   |   |   |
| /s/ Rik J. Deitsch                                  |   |   |   |   |
| Rik J. Deitsch                                      |   |   |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |

----
Performance and
Accountability 2014

What do taxpayers get back
for their investment in GAO?

* * * HIGHLIGHTS FROM GAO-15-1SP * * *

We returned $100 for every dollar
invested in us, to the tune of *
$54.4 billion in fiscal year 2014.

Financial Benefits GAO Recorded:

Dollars in billions
60
50
40
30
20
10

0

FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014

Qg0000000000_5
$) For example, our work helped $)
inform the Department of Defense's
inf he D f Def i
STS) decision to purchase sewer F-35 STS)
©9060 ovingsii billion ana OOO
$) $) reducing acquisition risks. $) 9S
SIsIsisisisiststststs

In fiscal year 2014, GAO made the
* government more efficient for you, *

the taxpayer, in 1,288 ways.

Other (Non-Financial) Benefits GAO Recorded:

Number

1,500 1,440

2013 2014

As one example, our recommendations
to the Federal Trade Commission led to
improved privacy protections for consumers’
mobile location data, such as in-car navigation.

CELL TOWER WEFI ACCESS POINTS GPS & CROWD-SOURCED
& IDENTIFICATION ASSISTED GPS POSITIONING

BY THE NUMBERS:

A look at our fiscal year 2014 accomplishments

a.

GAO exists to support the Congress in meeting its
constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the
performance and ensure the accountability of the federal
government for the benefit of the American people.

$100 return on each $1 Congress
invested in us

693 reports

129 congressional testimonies

Over 500 legal decisions

1,619 new recommendations to
improve government

78% of our FY10 recommendations
implemented based on our 4-year tracking

LOOKING FOR MORE INFORMATION?
Visit GAO.GOV. Read the full report: GAO-15-1SP. e7,(@)

® This work has been released into the public domain
#### Belinda F. SIAS v. ADMINISTRATOR, OFFICE OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and Frank’s Medical Mart.

No. 98-C-0944.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, *1998.*

Reconsideration Granted; Writ Denied June 26, 1998.

In re Sias, Belinda F.;—Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 96-496; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA97-0757.

*67Not considered; untimely. Judgment is definitive.

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.
**EXHIBIT
      31.2**




**CERTIFICATIONS**




I, Xin
      Feng ,
      certify
      that:




1 
      I have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Fortune Oil & Gas, Inc.




2. Based
      on my
      knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3. Based
      on my
      knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in
      this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respect the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of Fortune Oil & Gas, Inc.
      as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.




4. I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for Fortune Oil & Gas,
      Inc. I have recently commenced employment with Fortune Oil & Gas, Inc. We
      are planning the following:




a) to
      design
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
      relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this annual report is being prepared;




b) to
      evaluate
      the effectiveness of Fortune Oil & Gas, Inc.'s disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to our annual report for the year
      ending December 31, 2006 (the "Evaluation Date"); and




c) to
      provide
      conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
      based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;




5. I
      have not
      identified and evaluated all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
      of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
      to
      record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
      the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls.




6. I
      have not
      identified any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other
      employees who have a significant role in Fortune Oil & Gas, Inc.'s internal
      controls.




7. I
      am in the
      process of implementing significant internal controls relating to our business.
      I am not aware of any significant changes in internal controls which
      significantly affect internal controls previously in place by management.




**FORTUNE
              OIL & GAS, INC.***Date:
              November 16, 2005*
            By:
            */s/ Xin
              Feng*
              Xin
              FengChief
              Accounting Officer(principal
              financial officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of DCI USA, Inc. (the "Company")
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 15, 2005                /s/ Michael Gibbs
                                      -----------------------
                                      Michael Gibbs
                                      Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1820 

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance to State National 

Guards to provide counseling and reintegration services for members 

of reserve components of the Armed Forces ordered to active duty in 

support of a contingency operation, members returning from such active 

duty, veterans of the Armed Forces, and their families. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2011 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance 

to State National Guards to provide counseling and reintegration services for members of reserve components 

of the Armed Forces ordered to active duty in support 

of a contingency operation, members returning from such 

active duty, veterans of the Armed Forces, and their 

families. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard Out5 reach Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1820 IS

1 SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR NATIONAL GUARD COUNSELING AND 

2 REINTEGRATION SERVICES. 

3 (a) ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 

4 Defense may provide assistance to a State National Guard 

5 to support programs to provide pre- and post-deployment 

6 outreach, reintegration, and readjustment services to the 

7 following persons: 

8 (1) Members of reserve components of the 

9 Armed Forces who reside in the State or are mem10 bers of the State National Guard regardless of place 

11 of residence and who are ordered to active duty in 

12 support of a contingency operation. 

13 (2) Members described in paragraph (1) upon 

14 their return from such active duty. 

15 (3) Veterans (as defined in section 101(2) of 

16 title 38, United States Code). 

17 (4) Dependents of persons described in para18 graph (1), (2), or (3). 

19 (b) ELEMENTS OF PROGRAMS.—Programs supported 

20 under subsection (a) shall use direct person-to-person out21 reach and other relevant activities to ensure that eligible 

22 persons receive all the services and support available to 

23 them during pre-deployment, deployment, and reintegra24 tion periods. 

25 (c) MERIT-BASED OR COMPETITIVE DECISIONS.—A 

26 decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1820 IS

1 a specific State National Guard under subsection (a) 

2 shall— 

3 (1) be based on merit-based selection proce4 dures in accordance with the requirements of sec5 tions 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States 

6 Code, or on competitive procedures; and 

7 (2) comply with other applicable provisions of 

8 law. 

9 (d) STATE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

10 ‘‘State’’ means each of the several States, the Common11 wealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, 

12 and the Virgin Islands. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Forrest P. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

Theforegoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liabilityunder this section.  This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2is expressly incorporated by reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated: August 12, 2005 | /s/ Forrest P. Jordan   |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                        | Forrest P. Jordan       |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the 10-QSB of  American  Utilicraft  Corporation  (the
"Company"), the undersigned officers hereby certify that the Company's quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  that ended June 30, 2004 (the  "Report"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,

     a)   fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78M or 78O (D)); and

     b)   that information  contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the issuer



     This certificate is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not
be  deemed  to be a part  of the  Report  or  "filed"  for  any  other  purposes
whatsoever.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this certificate to be signed by
it Chief Financial Officer and its Principal Accounting Officer this 19th day of
November, 2004.


/s/ John J. Dupont                          /s/ M. Karen Shoemaker
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
John J. Dupont                             M. Karen Shoemaker
President and Chief Executive Officer      Principal Accounting Officer
No. 55611.

#### George E. Athans Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 149713-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 9666)

#### Joseph A. Paredes & Co. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 767, etc.

(Decided April 18, 1960)

*Lawrence é Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*George Gochran JDoub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement listed in schech ule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States concerning the merchandise referred to in the attached Schedule “A,” as follows:

> 1. Said merchandise consists of binoculars and leather carrying cases which, in *John P. Herber & Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*C.D. 1519, this Court held to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of articles.

> 2. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale, to all purchasers, in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation ito the United States, are the unit prices as shown in the attached schedule “A,” in United States currency, packing included, the foreign value of such or similar merchandise being no higher.

> 3. The appeals for reappraisement are limited to the items enumerated in schedule “A” and abandoned in all other respects and the said appeals may be deemed submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

*657On the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as such value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the items referred to in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of this decision, and that such value is represented by the unit prices as shown in said schedule “A” for the respective periods shown thereon, in United States currency, packing included.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent, the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 43144.

Suit 4223.

#### P. *H. Petry Co., R. J. Prentiss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 49 affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Wachter, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of FirstBingo.com;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and
6. The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 12th day of August, 2004.



| | /s/ Richard Wachter                   
| | --------------------------------------
| | Richard L. Wachter                    
| | President, Principal Financial Officer



---
No. 96-384.

#### Wyshak *v.*American Savings Bank, F. A., et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40715

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KOREY JAWAIN JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:01-CR-31-2

--------------------

December 4, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Korey Jackson appeals his convictions of conspiracy to

commit robbery and robbery under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. 

He argues that there was insufficient evidence that his offense

affected interstate commerce and that applying the aggregation

principle to prove the interstate commerce element of a Hobbs Act

offense is unconstitutional. 
No. 02-40715

-2-

The restaurant manager’s testimony that the restaurant

obtains supplies from businesses out of state and that the

restaurant closed early was sufficient to satisfy the interstate

commerce element of Jackson’s Hobbs Act violation. See United

States v. Jennings, 195 F.3d 795, 800 (5th Cir. 1999); United

States v. Hebert, 131 F.3d 514, 523-24 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Jackson’s constitutional challenge to the application of the

aggregation principle is without merit under current binding

precedent of this court. See United States v. Ferguson, 211 F.3d

878, 885 (5th Cir.); United States v. Robinson, 119 F.3d 1205,

1212 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
#### Greg MATLOCK, Sr., Paul Matlock, et al. v. The STATE of Louisiana, The Department of Transportation and Development.

No. 98-CC-3172.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 6, 1999.

In re Transportation & Dev. Dept, of; Louisiana State of; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”. No. 84-077: to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 98CW-2313.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                       ANSWERTHINK CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
                             LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES

                                                         JURISDICTION OF

ANSWERTHINK CONSULTING GROUP, INC.                          FLORIDA


SUBSIDIARIES

The Hackett Group, Inc.                                     Ohio
Delphi Partners, Inc.                                       New Jersey
Legacy Technology, Inc.                                     Massachusetts
Infinity Consulting Group, Inc.                             Indiana
triSpan, Inc.                                               Pennsylvania
Group Cortex, Inc.                                          Pennsylvania
CFT Consulting, Inc.                                        Florida
THINK New Ideas, Inc.                                       Delaware
Net Cube of New Jersey f/k/a Office of the Future           New Jersey
Net Cube of Delaware f/k/a Anzen Corporation                Delaware
SD Goodman Group, Inc.                                      New York
On Ramp, Inc.                                               New York
Scott Mednick & Associates                                  California
UbiCube Acquisition Corp.                                   Delaware
UbiCube Group, Inc.                                         Delaware
AnswerThink Florida, Inc. f/k/a UbiComs, Inc.               Delaware
NetComs USA, Inc.                                           Maine
NetComs Entertainment, Inc.                                 Maine
NetComs Europe Limited                                      United Kingdom
NetComs Entertainment, Ltd.                                 United Kingdom
RDI UbiComs Limited                                         United Kingdom
UbiComs EOOD                                                Bulgaria