alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10092]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology


Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Board of Overseers

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 
2, notice is hereby given that there will be a meeting of the Board of 
Overseers of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award on June 4, 
2008. The Board of Overseers is composed of eleven members prominent in 
the fields of quality, innovation, and performance excellence and 
appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, assembled to advise the 
Secretary of Commerce on the conduct of the Baldrige Award. The purpose 
of this meeting is to discuss and review information received from the 
National Institute of Standards and Technology with the members of the 
Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. The agenda 
will include: Baldrige Program budget update; Revisions to the award 
eligibility rules; Baldrige Collaborative activities; and the Baldrige 
Body of Knowledge and Baldrige Fellows Initiatives.

DATES: The meeting will convene June 4, 2008, at 8:30 a.m. and adjourn 
at 3 p.m. on June 4, 2008.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, Administration Building, Lecture Room A, 
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. All visitors to the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology site will have to pre-register to be admitted. 
Please submit your name, time of arrival, e-mail address and phone 
number to Diane Harrison no later than Tuesday, June 3, 2008, and she 
will provide you with instructions for admittance. Ms. Harrison's e-
mail address is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#42262b232c276c2a2330302b312d2c022c2b31366c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3878a828d86cd8b8291918a908c8da38d8a9097cd848c95">[email protected]</span></a> and her phone number is (301) 
975-2361.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Harry Hertz, Director, National 
Quality Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, telephone number (301) 975-2361.

    Dated: May 1, 2008.
James M. Turner,
Deputy Director.
 [FR Doc. E8-10092 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE



UNITED STATES CODE, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE



SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Amendment to the Annual Report of Global-Tech Appliances Inc. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C.K. Sham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John C.K. ShamJohn C.K. ShamPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: September 23, 2005
#### Barry MELTZER and Barbara Meltzer, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Samuel I. BURSTYN, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 98-342, 98-343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 23, 1998.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 4, 1998.

*346Russomano & Borrello, Herman J. Russo-mano and Robert J. Borrello, Miami, for appellants.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot, Paul S. Berger and David A. Friedman; Jones, Foster, Johnson & Stubbs and Sidney A. Stubbs, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

Before JORGENSON, LEVY and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order dismissing with prejudice Barry and Barbara Meltzer’s claims as dissenting shareholders finding, in the instant ease, that the letter dated April 4, 1997, written by the Meltzers’ counsel, was sufficient to notify the corporations of the Meltzers’ intent to oppose the proposed merger and demand payment for their shares. § 607.1320(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997); *Greco v. Tampa Wholesale Co.,*417 So.2d 994, 998 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)(“[T]he procedure by which a dissenting shareholder enforces his rights should be liberally construed in circumstances where no prejudice is shown to the corporation.”), *review denied,*431 So.2d 990 (Fla.1983).

Although we find that the trial court acted within its discretion in transferring venue of the Meltzers’ remaining claims to Palm Beach County, we remand this issue for reconsideration by the trial court in light of the reversal of the order dismissing the Meltzers’ claims as dissenting shareholders. Reconsideration is warranted because jurisdiction for the Meltzers’ claims as dissenting shareholders properly lies in Dade County, the county where the registered offices of the corporations are located. § 607.1320(7), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
#### ROYAL INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE, INC., Appellant, v. Julio QUEIROZ and Delmo Moura, Appellees.

No. 98-1657.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 21, 1998.

*376Gustavo Gutierrez, Miami, for appellant.

Arnaldo Velez, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. *See*§ 607.1502(1)(3), Fla.Stat. (1997); *see also Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.,*366 U.S. 276, 81 S.Ct. 1316, 6 L.Ed.2d 288 (1961); *Batavia Ltd. v. United States,*393 So.2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); *Kar Prods., Inc. v. Acker,*217 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969).
Case No. 14,064.

#### In re TIVOLI BREWING CO.

[11 N. B. R. 470.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

1875.

Bankruptcy — Failure to Pay Commercial Paper —Forty Days’ Limit — Premature Petition.

The petition in this case was filed June 19, 1874, the only act of bankruptcy alleged being a failure to pay the commercial paper of the debt- or, which fell due June 4, 1874. *Held,*that as under the amendment of June 22, 1874 [l8 Stat. *1313178], no person can be adjudged a bankrupt for failure to pay commercial paper before the expiration of forty days from the maturity of the said paper; and as this provision applies to cases commenced since December 1, 1873, this petition stands as having been prematurely filed and cannot be amended, and must therefore be dismissed, without costs.

In bankruptcy.

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The petition in this case, in involuntary bankruptcy, was filed June 19, 1S74. The only. act of bankruptcy it alleges is the failure to pay commercial paper which fell due June 4, 1874. As under the act of June 22, 1874, no person can be adjudged a bankrupt for the failure to pay commercial paper, on a petition filed before the expiration of forty days from the maturity of the paper (instead of fourteen days, as under the former law); and as this provision applies to cases commenced since December 1, 1873, this petition stands now as having been prematurely filed, and cannot be availed of after the expiration of the forty days, and cannot be amended,' but must be dismissed, without costs.
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp.

|1.  |  | EB Investment Corp  a Delaware corporation                       
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|2.  |  | Electronics Boutique of America Inc.a Pennsylvania corporation   
|3.  |  | Electronics Boutique Canada Inc.a Canadian corporation           
|4.  |  | EB Catalog Companya Nevada corporation                           
|5.  |  | Elbo, Inc.a Delaware corporation                                 
|6.  |  | EB Finance, Inc.a Delaware corporation                           
|7.  |  | EB International Holdings, Inc.a Delaware corporation            
|8.  |  | Electronics Boutique Australia Pty. Ltdan Australian company     
|9.  |  | EB Games Customer Services, Incan Ohio corporation               
|10. |  | Electronics Boutique Denmark Holdings ApSa Danish private company
|11. |  | Electronics Boutique Denmark ApSa Danish private company         
|12. |  | Electronics Boutique Norway ASa Norwegian private company        
|13. |  | EB Italy srlan Italian company                                   
|14. |  | EB Games Sweden ABa Swedish company                              
|15. |  | Electronics Boutique AGa German company                          
|16. |  | EB Specialty Services, Inc.a Delaware corporation                
|17. |  | EB Games Management Services ABa Swedish company                 
|18. |  | FR Sadsbury Second, LLCa Delaware limited liability company      
|19. |  | FR Sadsbury General Partner, LPa Delaware limited partnership    
|20. |  | FR Sadsbury Property Holding, LPa Delaware limited partnership   

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 3189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-962]



[[Page 3189]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10785 and <greek-i> 10786]


Texas Disaster <greek-i> TX-00226

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Texas dated 1/16/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 10/15/2006 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 1/16/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 3/19/2007.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/16/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties: Hardin, Newton.
Contiguous Counties:
Texas
    Jasper, Jefferson, Liberty, Orange, Polk, Sabine, Tyler
Louisiana:
    Beauregard, Calcasieu, Sabine, Vernon
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere:..................     6.250.
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere:...............     3.125.
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere:..................     7.934.
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit       4.000.
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit            5.000.
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit            4.000.
 Available Elsewhere:........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10785 B 
and for economic injury is 10786 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are Texas, 
Louisiana.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
 [FR Doc. E7-962 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRMA PUTRI WIRAYA,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 15-71133

Agency No. A096-351-599

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 18, 2017**

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Irma Putri Wiraya, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) March 13, 2015, order denying her 

motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider and review de novo claims 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71133 

of due process violations. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002).

We deny the petition for review.

We do not consider Wiraya’s contention that she timely filed her motion to 

reopen proceedings, or her contention concerning the sufficiency of her motion to 

reopen, which were previously reviewed by this court in Wiraya v. Holder, 585 

Fed. Appx. 495 (9th Cir. 2014).

On remand from this court, in denying Wiraya’s motion to reconsider, the 

BIA found that the contents of Wiraya’s documents did not establish any material 

change in conditions in Indonesia. The BIA did not abuse discretion in denying 

Wiraya’s motion to reconsider. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th 

Cir. 2010) (court “defer[s] to the BIA’s exercise of discretion unless it acted 

arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law”); see also Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 

F.3d 988, 996 (9th Cir. 2008) (requiring movant to produce material evidence with 

motion to reopen that conditions in country of nationality had changed).

We reject Wiraya’s contentions that the BIA, on remand, failed to comply 

with this court’s order, and that the BIA erred by not soliciting supplemental 

briefing or holding oral arguments. Thus, Wiraya’s due process claims fail. See 

Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error to prevail on a 
3 15-71133 

due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 673d Logistics Readiness Squadron Achieves 93% Vehicle Mission-capable Rate 

By Airman 1st Class Crystal A. JenkinsJBER Public Affairs

                JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON673d Logistics Readiness Squadronvehicle maintenancevehicle repairsheavy equipment maintenance
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act),
I, Curtis A. Morgan, President (principal executive officer and principal
financial officer) of Orion Power Holdings, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
         September 30, 2002 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2002                          /s/ Curtis A. Morgan
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Curtis A. Morgan
                                                 President (principal executive
                                                 officer and principal financial
                                                 officer)

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
# C_2012138EN.01003401.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/34

---

Action brought on 9 February 2012 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

(Case F-18/12)

(2012/C 138/78)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions transferring pension rights acquired before entry into Commission service on the basis of the re-calculated PMO proposal.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions annulling and replacing the proposals for transfer of the applicants’ pension rights pursuant to their application under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, which contain a new proposal calculated on the basis of the general implementing provisions adopted on 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions annulling and replacing the proposals for transfer of the applicants’ pension rights pursuant to their application under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, which contain a new proposal calculated on the basis of the general implementing provisions adopted on 3 March 2011;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
# C_2012366EN.01004001.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/40

---

Order of the General Court of 3 October 2012 — 3M Pumps v OHIM — 3M (3M Pumps)

(Case T-25/12) (1)

1

2012/C 366/81

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9680)

#### F. L. Kraemer & Company *v.*United States

Entry No. WH 14831.

(Decided April 25, 1960)

*Eugene R. Pichrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above, has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issue in the appeal for reappraisement noted above is the same in all material respects as the issue in the case of *United States*vs. *S. Shamash & Sons, Inc.,*A.R.D. 41, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> *676IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price at the time of exportation to the United States of the silk flat crepe involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was 96 cents per yard, packed, and that the price for home consumption was no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the case may be deemed submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and hold the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the.proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such statutory value is 96 cents per yard, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.