alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS 

Product Name : 

Product Code : 

Chemical Name : Caprylic/Capric Fatty Acids 

Properties Specifications 

Appearance, (melt) clear, slightly yellow - yellow 

Acid Value , '•'> 

Saponification Value 

Iodine Value . 

Moisture, % 

Unsaponifiable (typical), %0.5 max 

Color, 

%Transmittance 440/550 mu 90/95 min 

Lovibond 5-1/4", Red 1.0 max 

Fatty Acid Composition 

Approved By : Date 

Director, Quality/Product Development 

Date 

Director, Manufacturing 
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS 

Product Name : 

Product Code : 

Chemical Name : Caprylic/Capric Fatty Acids 

Properties Specifications 

Appearance, (melt) clear, slightly yellow - yellow 

Acid Value ,

 v 

Saponification Value 

Iodine Value •.. , 

Moisture, % <>. • . 

Unsaponifiable (typical), %0.5 max 

Color, 

%Transmittance 440/550 mu 90/95 min 

Lovibond 5-1/4", Red 1.0 max 

Fatty Acid Composition 

Approved By : Date : 

Director, Quality/Product Development 

Date : 

Director, Manufacturing
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Kathy Christopher, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of USIP.Com, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent

 

----

 

to the date of our most recent evaluation, includingany corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.

 
| Date: November 10, 2003 |                          |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                    |                          | /s/ Kathy Christopher |   |
|                    | Kathy Christopher, Controller |

 

 

2

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 188 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 188

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 98 West 
   First Street, Yuma, Arizona, as the ``John M. Roll United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN M. ROLL UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse under construction, 
as of the date of enactment of this Act, at 98 West First Street, Yuma, 
Arizona, shall be known and designated as the ``John M. Roll United 
States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``John M. Roll United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate February 1, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 188

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 98 West 
   First Street, Yuma, Arizona, as the ``John M. Roll United States 
                             Courthouse''.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1368 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1368

   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal 
  distributions for medicine qualified only if for prescribed drug or 
                                insulin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2011

  Mr. Roberts (for himself and Mr. Nelson of Nebraska) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to repeal 
  distributions for medicine qualified only if for prescribed drug or 
                                insulin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Access to Medication 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DISTRIBUTIONS FOR MEDICINE QUALIFIED ONLY IF FOR 
              PRESCRIBED DRUG OR INSULIN.

    Section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(Public Law 111-148) and the amendments made by such section are 
repealed; and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if 
such section, and amendments, had never been enacted.

SEC. 3. RESCISSION OF UNSPENT FEDERAL FUNDS TO OFFSET LOSS IN REVENUES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, of all 
available unobligated funds, appropriated discretionary funds are 
hereby rescinded in such amounts as determined by the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget such that the aggregate amount of such 
rescission equals the reduction in revenues to the Treasury by reason 
of the repeal, and amendments, made by section 2.
    (b) Implementation.--The Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget shall determine and identify from which appropriation accounts 
the rescission under subsection (a) shall apply and the amount of such 
rescission that shall apply to each such account. Not later than 60 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the 
Office of Management and Budget shall submit a report to the Secretary 
of the Treasury and Congress of the accounts and amounts determined and 
identified for rescission under the preceding sentence.
    (c) Exception.--This section shall not apply to the unobligated 
funds of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Social Security 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 4, 2015

No. 04-15-00096-CV

ALS 88 DESIGN BUILD LLC,

Appellant

v.

MOAB CONSTRUCTION CO.

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-03033

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Judy Mata's notification of Late Reporters Record is GRANTED IN PART. Time is 

extended to June 15, 2015. No further extensions.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Brett D. Mayer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bingham Canyon
Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                             /s/ Brett D. Mayer
Date: May 10, 2006           _____________________________________________
                             Brett D. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

            Certification by the President pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sibling Entertainment Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on the Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell Maxwell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on
the dates and for the periods presented therein.

                                     SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

Date: October 25, 2005               By:  /s/ Mitchell Maxwell
                                          --------------------
                                          Mitchell Maxwell
                                          President & Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# C_2014175EN.01001602.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/16

---

Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 February 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu and the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Silvia Georgiana Câmpean v Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Mediaş, Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu (Case C-97/13), Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Alexandria v George Ciocoiu (Case C-214/13)

(Joined Cases C-97/13 and C-241/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Pollution tax charged on first registration of motor vehicles - Neutrality of tax between imported second-hand motor vehicles and similar vehicles already on the domestic market))

2014/C 175/19

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring courts

Referring courts

Tribunalul Sibiu, Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Silvia Georgiana Câmpean (Case C-97/13), Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Alexandria (Case C-214/13)

Applicants:

Defendants: Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Mediaş, Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu (Case C-97/13), George Ciocoiu (Case C-214/13)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunalul Sibiu, Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Tax on pollutant emissions levied on motor vehicles on their first registration or when a right of ownership is first recorded — Exemption for motor vehicles subject to earlier taxes — Possibility of recovering through the courts the taxes to which those vehicles have been subject — Possible discouragement of the putting into circulation of second-hand vehicles purchased in other Member States — Compatibility of the national legislation with Article 110 TFEU

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a system of taxation, such as that introduced and then delimited by the national legislation at issue in the disputes in the main proceedings, by which a Member State levies a pollution tax on motor vehicles which is structured in such a way as to discourage the putting into circulation in that Member State of second-hand vehicles purchased in other Member States, but without discouraging the purchase of second-hand vehicles of the same age and condition on the domestic market.

---

(1)  OJ C 129, 4.5.2013.

1

OJ C 189, 29.6.2013.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1901 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1901

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitations 
   on the amount excluded from the gross estate with respect to land 
             subject to a qualified conservation easement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2011

   Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitations 
   on the amount excluded from the gross estate with respect to land 
             subject to a qualified conservation easement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Family Farm and Ranchland 
Protection Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN LIMITATIONS ON THE AMOUNT EXCLUDED FROM THE GROSS 
              ESTATE WITH RESPECT TO LAND SUBJECT TO A QUALIFIED 
              CONSERVATION EASEMENT.

    (a) Increase in Dollar Limitation on Exclusion.--Paragraph (3) of 
section 2031(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
exclusion limitation) is amended by striking ``the exclusion limitation 
is'' and all that follows and inserting ``the exclusion limitation is 
$5,000,000.''.
    (b) Increase in Percentage of Value of Land Which Is Excludable.--
Paragraph (2) of section 2031(c) of such Code (relating to applicable 
percentage) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``40 percent'' and inserting ``50 
        percent'', and
            (2) by striking ``2 percentage points'' and inserting ``2.5 
        percentage points''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to the estates of decedents dying after December 31, 2011.
                                 <all>
```
No. 49524.

#### Protests 73270-K, etc., of John Wanamaker, Philadelphia, et al. (Philadelphia, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Promissory Note


Exhibit 10.7






















PROMISSORY NOTE




Borrower:

Eternal Image of 28800 Orchard Lake Road MI 48334

Lender:

Woodrow Browne



Principal Amount:

$75,000.00




1.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Eternal Image promises to pay to Woodbrow Browne at such address as may be provided in writing to Eternal Image , the principal sum of seventy-five thousand ( $75,000.00 ) USD, with interest payable on the unpaid principal at the rate of 8.25 percent per annum, calculated monthly not in advance and in accordance with the attached amortization schedule. 

2.

This Note will be repaid in 3 installments of $25,000 on April 1, 2007, July 1, 2007, and October 1, 2007. The final payment will of $3,201.99 will be made on November 1, 2007 in accordance with the attached amortization schedule. 

3.

At any time while not in default under this Note, Eternal Image may pay the outstanding balance then owing under this Note to Woodrow Browne without further bonus or penalty.

4.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Note, if Eternal Image defaults in the performance of any obligation under this Note, then Woodrow Browne may declare the principal amount owing and interest due under this Note at that time to be immediately due and payable.

5.

This Note will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

6.

If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, it is the parties' intent that such provision be reduced in scope by the court only to the extent deemed necessary by that court to render the provision reasonable and enforceable and the remainder of the provisions of this Agreement will in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated as a result.

7.

All costs, expenses and expenditures including, and without limitation, the complete legal costs incurred by Woodrow Browne in enforcing this Note as a result of any default by Eternal Image , will be added to the principal then outstanding and will immediately be paid by Eternal Image . 

8.

This Note will ensure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of Eternal Image and Woodrow Browne. Eternal Image waives presentment for payment, notice of non-payment, protest and notice of protest.

9.

Payments will be made in accordance with the attached amortization schedule. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF Eternal Image has duly affixed his signature under seal on this 21st day of December, 2006.




												
	 	SIGNED, SEALED, AND DELIVERED

this 21st day of December, 2006 in front of the person below who is over 18 years of age and not involved with the contents of this document or related to any of the parties in this document.



__________________________

(signature of witness)

WITNESS DETAILS:

Name:

_______________

Address:

_______________

 

_______________

	 	 

	


 




Clint Mytych

Eternal Image – Chief Executive Officer










 




James R Parliament

Eternal Image – Chief Financial Officer