alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1818 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1818

      To amend SAFETEA-LU to ensure that projects that assist the 
 establishment of aerotropolis transportation systems are eligible for 
                certain grants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 8, 2011

 Ms. Stabenow introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend SAFETEA-LU to ensure that projects that assist the 
 establishment of aerotropolis transportation systems are eligible for 
                certain grants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aerotropolis Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROJECTS OF NATIONAL AND REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

    (a) Eligible Project Defined.--Section 1301(c)(2) of SAFETEA-LU (23 
U.S.C. 101 note) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Eligible project.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `eligible project' 
                means any surface transportation project eligible for 
                Federal assistance under title 23, United States Code, 
                including freight railroad projects and activities 
                eligible under such title.
                    ``(B) Inclusion of aerotropolis transportation 
                system projects.--The term `eligible project' includes 
                a combination of projects described in subparagraph (A) 
                that, as a group--
                            ``(i) assists in the establishment of an 
                        aerotropolis transportation system; and
                            ``(ii) meets the eligibility requirement 
                        set forth in subsection (d).''.
    (b) Aerotropolis Transportation System Defined.--Section 1301(c) of 
SAFETEA-LU (23 U.S.C. 101 note) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4);
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (1) as paragraph (3); and
            (3) by inserting before paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(1) Aerotropolis transportation system.--The term 
        `aerotropolis transportation system' means a planned and 
        coordinated multimodal freight and passenger transportation 
        network that the Secretary determines will provide efficient, 
        cost-effective, sustainable, and intermodal connectivity to a 
        defined region of economic significance centered around a major 
        airport.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 48758.

#### Protests 989561-G, etc., of L. Profumo *&*Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the cited cases the following allowances were made by the court to compensate for foreign substances on the outside of certain cheese: (1) 21⁄2 percent for cheese similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42309, and (2) 1 percent for certain other cheese similar to that the subject of said C. D. 706 and Abstract 42309. Protests sustained to this extent.
#### Louis Roder et al., Respondents, *v.*Nathan Goldsmith, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

March 3, 1966.

*P err ell, Nielsen & Stephens (Thomas O. Perr ell*and *John Nielsen*of counsel), for appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The Civil Court lacked the power to assert in personam jurisdiction over the defendant on the basis of personal service of process in Nassau County. The action is founded On an out-of-city tort; the defendant is a nonresident of New York City, and the fact that he is regularly employed within the city will not justify extraterritorial service.

The orders should be reversed, with $10 costs, defendant’s motions granted and the complaint dismissed, with costs. .

Hofstadteb, J. P., Hecht and Gold, JJ., concur.

Orders reversed, etc.
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sanding Tao, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
November 15, 2010
  /s/
      Sanding TaoSanding
      Tao
                  Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial
                  Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of USIP.Com,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Craig  Burton,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Craig Burton
Craig Burton
President\Chief Acct. Officer


Date:  August 21, 2006















                                  END OF FILING
#### Penson & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6562.

Entry No. 704927.

Invoice dated Manchester, England, June 27, 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 6, 1945. '

(Decided December 2, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930', to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1879 

To ensure that States have enacted criminal statutes that require individuals 

to report child abuse cases to law enforcement or child protective agencies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2011 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To ensure that States have enacted criminal statutes that 

require individuals to report child abuse cases to law 

enforcement or child protective agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Abuse Reporting 

5 Enforcement Act’’ or the ‘‘CARE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO REPORT 

7 CHILD ABUSE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2002 of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1397a) is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following new subsection: 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1879 IS

1 ‘‘(g) REPORTING OF CHILD ABUSE.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A State shall not be eligible 

3 for any payment from its allotment under section 

4 2003 if the Secretary determines that the State has 

5 failed to satisfy the requirement described in para6 graph (2). 

7 ‘‘(2) STATE CHILD ABUSE REPORTING RE8 QUIREMENT.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The requirement de10 scribed in this paragraph is that the State has 

11 enacted a law that creates a felony offense with 

12 a minimum penalty of 1-year imprisonment for 

13 any person who, having reasonable cause to be14 lieve that a child has been subjected to child 

15 abuse or acts of child abuse, fails to report such 

16 information immediately to the relevant State 

17 law enforcement agency and the child protection 

18 agency of the State. 

19 ‘‘(B) IMMUNITY.—The law of a State de20 scribed in subparagraph (A) may provide immu21 nity from civil liability and criminal liability to 

22 an individual who reports child abuse or acts of 

23 child abuse. 

24 ‘‘(C) CHILD ABUSE.—For purposes of this 

25 paragraph, the terms ‘child abuse’ or ‘acts of 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1879 IS

1 child abuse’ shall have the meanings given such 

2 terms in the criminal code of the State.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect 18 months after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 19-2008]


Foreign-Trade Zone 26 Atlanta, GA, Withdrawal of Application for 
Subzone Status, Kia Motors Manufacturing Georgia, Inc. (Motor Vehicles)

    Notice is hereby given of the withdrawal of the application 
requesting special-purpose subzone status for the motor vehicle 
manufacturing plant of Kia Motors Manufacturing Georgia, Inc. The 
application was filed on March 28, 2008 (73 FR 20247, 4-15-2008).
    The withdrawal was requested due to changed circumstances involving 
potential expansion of FTZ 26 to include new general-purpose (multi-
user) sites in the western Georgia area, and the case has been closed 
without prejudice.

    Dated: April 25, 2008.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-10077 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                              SMARTIRE SYSTEMS INC.
                          COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

The Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United
States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP").

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Year Ended       Year Ended
                                      July 31, 2001    July 31, 2000
                                      -------------    -------------
<S>                                    <C>               <C>
($000's except per share data)

Net income (loss) in accordance
with GAAP                              $    (5,507)      $     1,905
                                       ===========       ===========

Weighted average number
of common shares                        14,296,240        13,159,385
                                       ===========       ===========

Diluted weighted
average number of shares                14,296,240        13,296,988
                                       ===========       ===========

Basic and diluted income
(loss) in accordance with
United States GAAP                     $     (0.39)      $      0.14
                                       ===========       ===========
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Sino Clean Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Baowen Ren, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at the date and for the periods
indicated.






Dated: May
      19, 2008
            
            
            /s/ Baowen
      RenBaowen
      Ren
              Chief
      Executive
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1927 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1927

 To modify the criteria used by the Corps of Engineers to dredge small 
                                 ports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 30, 2011

 Mr. Paul (for himself and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the criteria used by the Corps of Engineers to dredge small 
                                 ports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS CRITERIA TO DREDGE SMALL 
              PORTS.

    (a) Minimum Tonnage Requirement.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law (including regulations), effective beginning on the 
date of enactment of this Act, the tonnage requirement with respect to 
the consideration of dredging of small ports by the Corps of Engineers 
shall be a minimum of 500,000 tons, as calculated in accordance with 
subsection (b).
    (b) Calculation.--For purposes of subsection (a) and any other 
activity of the Corps of Engineers carried out on or after the date of 
enactment of this Act, tonnage shall be calculated by each relevant 
port authority and submitted to the Corps of Engineers.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

                          School Specialty, Inc.
                     Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
 The Fiscal Years Ended April 25, 1998, April 24, 1999 and April 29, 2000

<TABLE>
                                    Balance at  Charged to  Charged to                                  Balance at
                                    Beginning   Costs and     Other                                       End of
Description           Date          of Period   Expenses     Accounts      Deductions       Date          Period
  <S>                  <C>             <C>         <C>         <C>           <C>             <C>            <C>
Allowance for
 doubtful accounts  April 27, 1997    471,000    274,000     293,000 (a)  (322,000) (b)  April 25, 1998     716,000
                    April 25, 1998    716,000    266,000   1,579,000 (a)  (327,000) (b)  April 24, 1999   2,234,000
                    April 24, 1999  2,234,000    171,000     200,000 (a)  (861,000) (b)  April 29, 2000   1,744,000


Accumulated
 amortization
 of intangibles     April 27, 1997  3,324,000  2,061,000                   (24,000) (c)  April 25, 1998   5,361,000
                    April 25, 1998  5,361,000  4,656,000                  (119,000) (c)  April 24, 1999   9,898,000
                    April 24, 1999  9,898,000  6,895,000                  (947,000) (c)  April 29, 2000  15,846,000

</TABLE>
____________

(a)  Allowance for doubtful accounts acquired in purchase acquisitions.
(b)  Represents (write-offs) / recoveries of uncollectable accounts receivable.
(c)  Represents (write-offs) / recoveries of fully amortized intangible assets.
#### Fondeville & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7661.

Invoice dated Bristol, England, March 13, 1946.

Certified March 19, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 29, 1946.

Entry No. 756772/1.

(Decided February 7, 1949)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Charles J. Miville,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in this reappraisement are the same in all material respects as in the case of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export value of the merchandise is the value found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Paul R. Chubbuck v. John W. Beaty.

No. 16,151.

1. Motion to Open *Judgment*— Notice *of Pendency of Action.*An application to open a judgment reiidered upon publication service, on the ground that the defendant did not have notice of the pendency of the action, was properly denied.

2. *-Evidence*— Affidavits *by the Adverse Party. A*deposition offered in evidence to show that the defendant had notice that the action was pending was an affidavit within the meaning of section 77 of the .civil code.

3. *-,-Evidence.*It was said that section 77 of the civil code does not prohibit the court from hearing any competent evidence tending to show that the defendant had notice of the pendency of the action in time to defend.

Error from Morton district court; William H. Thompson, judge.

Opinion filed October 9, 1909.

Affirmed.

*George Getty,*for the plaintiff in error.

*G. Porter Craddock,*and *William Easton Hutchison,*for the defendant in error.

*Per Curiam:*

Paul R. Chubbuck presented an application to the district court of Morton county to open up a judgment rendered against him upon service by publication, claiming that he had no actual notice or' knowl*790edge of the pendency of the action in time to defend. At the hearing the adverse party offered evidence to the contrary, consisting of an affidavit of the attorney for the plaintiff stating that he had sent to Chubbuck’s post-office address in Illinois a registered letter enclosing a copy of the notice of publication clipped from a newspaper, and had received in reply thereto a registry return card signed by Chubbuck, which was attached to the affidavit as an exhibit. This receipt bore date twenty-seven days before judgment was rendered. It was offered in evidence, as was the deposition of Chubbuck, in which he admitted his signature but stated that he had no recollection of signing the receipt nor of receiving a copy of the notice and would not swear that the letter did not contain a copy of the notice. On this evidence the court refused to open up the judgment, and Chubbuck complains.

It is seriously contended that section 77 of the code of civil procedure, which permits the adverse party to offer counter-affidavits, must be construed with such strictness as to prohibit the introduction of any other kind of testimony, and that the court erred in admitting in evidence the registry receipt and the deposition of the defendant because they were not affidavits. The registry receipt was a part of the affidavit of the plaintiff’s attorney and was attached to it as an exhibit. The deposition was a verified written declaration of a witness, and therefore an affidavit. *(Hanna v. Barrett,*39 Kan. 446; *Bank v. Bank,*59 Kan. 354.) Besides, there is nothing in the statute which prohibits the court from hearing any competent evidence tending to show that the defendant had notice or knowledge of the pendency of the action in time to defend.

The judgment is affirmed.
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Ashley Tangonan-Lyman <ashley_pua_l3@yahoo.com> 

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:45 PM 

scott. fau I k@dot.co m 

EAS (OST) 

EAS KAULAPAPA 

Dear Department of Transportation, 

;j: 

I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, and Ho'olehua. 

Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, frequent flights, multiple islands 

and ease of booking via Global Distribution System (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline etc.). It is important we have 

safe, stable and affordable service to Kalaupapa. I travel a lot on mokulele airlines for work, pleaser, and there flight 

availability is what our community depends on. 

Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years 

Mahalo Nui Loa, 

Ashley Tango nan 

1
<PAGE>   1


                  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT
                                 BY AND BETWEEN
                       SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
                                       AND
                         BIRCH TELECOM OF MISSOURI, INC.

         The Interconnection Agreement ("the Agreement") by and between
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ("SWBT") and Birch Telecom of Missouri, Inc.
("CLEC") dated May 27, 1998 is hereby amended as follows:

         (1) Addition of the following Appendices to existing agreement:

             -  Operator Services (OS)
             -  Directory Assistance (DA)
             -  Resale
             -  Collocation

         (2) The parties agree that the terms of the above-referenced Resale
Appendix shall supersede and replace the Resale Agreement Between Southwestern
Bell Telephone Company and Birch Telecom of Missouri, Inc. dated August 21, 1997
which shall terminate upon the effective date of this Resale Appendix.

         (3) This Amendment shall not modify or extend the Effective Date or
Term of the underlying Agreement, but rather, shall be coterminous with such
Agreement.

         (4) EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN, ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
UNDERLYING AGREEMENT SHALL REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT, and
such terms are hereby incorporated by reference and the Parties hereby reaffirm
the terms and provisions thereof.

         (5) This Amendment shall be filed with and is subject to approval by
the Public Service Commission of the State of Missouri and shall become
effective ten (10) days following approval by such Commission.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Agreement was exchanged in
duplicate on this 18th day of November, 1998, by SWBT, signing by and through
its duly authorized representative, and CLEC, signing by and through its duly
authorized representative.


<PAGE>   2



BIRCH TELECOM OF MISSOURI, INC.          SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY

By:  /s/ Gregory C. Lawhon           By: /s/ Larry B. Cooper
   ----------------------------          ------------------------------------
Title Senior Vice President              Title:  President - Industry Markets


Name: Gregory C. Lawhon                  Name: Larry B. Cooper 
     --------------------------               -------------------------------
(Print or Type)                          (Print or Type)