alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 7, 1942

No. 47044.

#### Protests 11838-K, etc., of J. A. Deknatel & Son, Inc.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
Certifications
I, Sukhbir Singh Mudan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A-3 for the quarter ended September 30,2003, of Caneum, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting;
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 

 

 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 22, 2004     /s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan Sukhbir Singh Mudan, President(Principal executive officer)
2
No. 47714.

#### Protests 740916-G, etc., of Mexican American Hat Co. et al. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “8-bu paper hats” similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), the claim at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 21, 2010 

# Order

September 21, 2010

138602 (31)

CATHERINE WILCOX, individually, and as Next Friend of ISAAC WILCOX, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

SUNRISE HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Intervening Plaintiff, SC: 138602 v COA: 290515 Kent CC: 08-010129-NF STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ____________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion by defendant-appellee for extension of the time for filing its brief is considered, a nd it appearing the brief was filed September 17, 2010, the time for filing is extended to that date.
No. 96-189.

#### Michigan *v.*Barrera et al.

Sup. Ct. Mich. Motion of respondent Patrick Michael Musall for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
Before The Third Division,

September 13, 1939

No. 42110.

#### Protests 633472-G, etc., of P. Pastene & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of Abstract 40880 and *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284) the court sustained the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 25822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-10056]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending March 14, 2008

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-1996-1131, DOT-OST-1996-1248, and DOT-OST-
1996-1873.
    Date Filed: March 14, 2008.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: April 4, 2008.
    Description: Application of United Air Lines, Inc. requesting a 
renewal of its experimental certificate of public convenience and 
necessity for Route 130, segments 1, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 10 which authorize 
United to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, 
property and mail between various points in the United States and 
points in Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0105.
    Date Filed: March 14, 2008.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: April 4, 2008.
    Description: Application of Federal Express Corporation (``FedEx 
Express'') requesting an exemption authorizing scheduled foreign air 
transportation of property and mail (1) between Oakland, California, on 
the one hand, and Guadalajara and Monterrey, Mexico, on the other hand, 
as of April 1, 2008, (2) between Lafayette, Louisiana and Guadalajara, 
Mexico as of May 1, 2008. FedEx Express also requests an amendment to 
its certificate of public convenience and necessity for Route 568 to 
engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail 
between a point or points in the United States and a point or points in 
Mexico.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E8-10056 Filed 5-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Exhibit 31.1



                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Art Malone, Jr., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Secured Data, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures; and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
          about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as
          of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on
          such evaluation;

     d)   disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
          internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
          registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: November 19, 2003

/s/ Art Malone, Jr.
--------------------
Art Malone, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
#### Joseph Dawkins, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Curtis Carroll, Defendant in Error.

An Appeal or Writ of Error does not lie to an order granting a new trial in a common law case.

This was a Writ of Error, under the act of 1852~’3, to an order of the Circuit Court of Leon County, granting a new trial to the defendant in error. The Writ of Error was issued, and the cause taken to the Supreme Court, before it was finally decided in the Court below upon the new trial granted.

*Archer*and *Paypy*for Plaintiff in Error.

*P. S. Walker*for Defendant in error.

BALTZELL, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the.Court.

It was not the design of the Legislature, as we conceive, in the passage of the act of 1852-’3, “ in addition to and amendatory of the several acts concerning Writs of Error and Appeals to the Supreme Court,” to allow a Writ of Error to an order granting a new trial. That act provider *408“ that orders and judgments wherein the Circuit Court shall allow and grant, or shall refuse to allow and grant any motion for a new trial, or any motion to amend the pleadings, or to file new and additional pleadings, or to amend the record of any cause during the term of the Court at which it was determined, or shall refuse to allow and grant a motion for the continuance of the cause, *shall and may he assigned for matter and cause of*error, upon any writ of error sued out, or appeal taken to the Supreme Court.”

By the original act, an Appeal or Writ of Error lies only to a final judgment, and it is upon the trial of a case so brought up that the grant or refusal of any or all these motions may with propriety be determined. To allow the appeal during the progress of the case, as the pleadings are amended, or a motion for a new trial, or a continuance is granted or refused, would be to protract and delay a case, at the caprice of either party, to the almost entire defeat of justice. We are not aware of any such course in any of the States where these orders are the subject of revision ; indeed, are confident that the opposite practice universally prevails.

In the succeeding section of the same act, we find a pro. vision “ *that appeals ma/y he taken and prosecuted from, any interlocutory*order, decision, judgment, or decree of the Circiut Court, sitting as Courts of Equity.” Why this change of language, unless to intimate a different purpose on the part of the Legislature in the two classes of cases ?

The Writ of Error will be dismissed, with costs.
123 STAT. 3014 PUBLIC LAW 111–102—NOV. 30, 2009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2004: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Sept. 8, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–102 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4282 Beach 

Street in Akron, Michigan, as the ‘‘Akron Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. AKRON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4282 Beach Street in Akron, Michigan, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Akron Veterans Memorial Post 

Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Akron Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

Approved November 30, 2009. 

Nov. 30, 2009 

[H.R. 2004] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLIC LAWS
NO. 03

- 14

- 00676

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

ANGELITA RODRIGUEZ PACHECO

, Appellant

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 424th Judicial District Court

Cause No. 41988

Burnet County, Texas

The Honorable Dan Mills , Judge Presiding

APPELLANT'S THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Gary E. Prust

State Bar No. 24056166

1607 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 469

- 0092 Fax: (512) 469

- 9102 gary@prustlaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED ACCEPTED
03-14-00676-CR

5674355
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
6/15/2015 11:53:00 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKAPPELLANT ’ S THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE BRIEF

Appellant, Angelita Rodriguez Pacheco , file this, her “ Third Motion for

Extension of Time to File Brief,” and in support thereof shows as follows.

I.

1. Appellant's Motion is brought pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P 10.5(b).

2. Appellant has once requested previously an extensi on of time within which

to file her brief.

3. Appel l ant's brief is due on June 19, 2015

.

4. Appellant's attorney had a very busy trial and appellate schedule du ring the

months of May and into June 2015

. Appellant’s attorney expects he will be in trial

the week of June 22, and that trial is expected to last all week. Appellant’s attorney

has also just received news of his fathers passing on June 15, 2015. He will be out

of the office in order to make arrangements for the funeral.

5. In order to address the issues raised in the present appeal thoroughly,

Appella nt's attorney will require more time to complete his brief

. Appellant’s

attorney will require until July 20, 2015 to complete his brief

.

6. Accordingly, Appellants request that this Court allow him until July 20

,

2015 to file his brief.Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Gary E. Prust

Gary E. Prust

SBN 24056166

1607 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 469

- 0092 Fax: (512) 469

- 9102 gary@prustlaw.com Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

In compliance with Rule 9.5(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the undersigned attorney certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion was served upon Mr. R. Blake Ewing with the 33 rd and 424 th Judicial District Attorney’s Office via electronic transmission to his email address at asstda2@burnetcountytexas.org in accordance Rule 9.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on this the 15th day of June , 2015

.

/s/ Gary E. Prust

Gary E. Prust

CERTIFICATE OF COMPL IANCE

Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P ROC . 9.4(i)(3), I hereby certify this motion

contains 192 words. This is a computer

- generated document created in Microsoft Word, using 14

- point typeface. In making this this certificate, I rely on the word count provided by the software use to prepare the document.

/s/ Gary E Prust

Gary E. Prust
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly report of Priviam, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 19 , 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carol Dore-Falcone,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(3) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(4) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Daniel
      UrreaDaniel
      UrreaChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      19, 2008
No. 48840.

#### Protests 92320-K, etc., of Kraft Cheese Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146, 48269, and 48537. The protests were sustained accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9185]



[[Page 27149]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG) affords 
stakeholders the opportunity to give policy, management, and technical 
input concerning Trinity River (California) restoration efforts to the 
Trinity Management Council. Primary objectives of the meeting will 
include discussion of the following topics: Habitat/geomorphic mapping, 
gravel augmentation planning, Trinity River Restoration Program (TRRP) 
budget, Integrated Assessment Plan, reimbursability of TRRP program 
costs, TAMWG communications with the Trinity Management Council, TAMWG 
membership/quorum/bylaws in regard to voting. Completion of the agenda 
is dependent on the amount of time each item takes. The meeting could 
end early if the agenda has been completed. The meeting is open to the 
public.

DATES: The Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group will meet from 9 
a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday, June 19, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Weaverville Victorian Inn, 
1709 Main St., 299 West, Weaverville, CA 96093. For more information, 
please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1655 Heindon Road, 
Arcata, CA 95521. For background information and questions regarding 
the Trinity River Restoration Program, please contact Douglas 
Schleusner, Executive Director, Trinity River Restoration Program, P.O. 
Box 1300, 1313 South Main Street, Weaverville, CA 96093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy A. Brown of the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, telephone: (707) 
822-7201. Randy A. Brown is the working group's Designated Federal 
Officer. For questions regarding the Trinity River Restoration Program, 
please contact Douglas Schleusner, Executive Director, telephone: (530) 
623-1800.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), this notice announces a meeting 
of the Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG).

    Dated: April 25, 2007.
Randy A. Brown,
Designated Federal Officer, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, Arcata, 
CA.
[FR Doc. E7-9185 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
(Reap. Dec. 9430)

#### H. P. Lambert Co., Inc. of La. *v.*United States

Entry No. 399.

(Decided May 20, 1959)

Plantiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-70530,
333-63517 and 333-45144) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Carreker Corporation 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan and the Carreker Corporation Director Stock Option Plan, of
our report dated March 12, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Carreker Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
January 31, 2004.



Dallas,
Texas
April 5, 2004

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CapLease, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shawn P. Seale, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 /s/
      SHAWN P. SEALEShawn
      P. SealeSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerFebruary
      18, 2011
     A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CapLease, Inc. and will be retained by
CapLease, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.