alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11-1112-pr Ocasio v. Deluke 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 

## SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32. 1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 17 thday of April, two thousand twelve. PRESENT: JOHN M. WALKER, JR., GERARD E. LYNCH, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., Circuit Judges.

_____________________________________ OMAR OCASIO, Plaintiff-Appellant , v. No. 11-1112-pr F. DELUKE, C.O., GREAT MEADOW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al. , Defendants-Appellees

.

_____________________________________

FOR APPELLANT: Omar Ocasio, pro se , New York, New York.2 FOR APPELLEES: Victor Paladino, Assistant Solicitor General, Albany, New York (Barbara D. Underwood, Nancy A. Spiegel, on the brief ), for Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York.
Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Gary L. Sharpe, Chief Judge ; David R. Homer, Magistrate Judge ). UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREEDthat the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Appellant Omar Ocasio, proceeding pro se , appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees. Ocasio’s complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleges numerous constitutional violations by officials at New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision at Great Meadow Correctional Facility. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, which was adopted by the district court, correctly found that Ocasio failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. That failure warranted the grant of summary judgment against him. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Moreover, other than the excessive force claims, none of Ocasio’s claims would survive summary judgment even if he had exhausted his administrative remedies. Therefore we affirm the district court’s judgment for substantially the same reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s thorough report.3 We have considered all of Appellant’s arguments on appeal and have found them to be without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED

.
FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
Exhibit 10.15

THIS DEED is made on                                      22 January 2007

BETWEEN

(1)     CLPE HOLDINGS LIMITED (registered number 3720212) whose registered
        office is at Unit 14&15 Queensbrook, Bolton Technology Exchange, Spa
        Road, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL1 4AY ("Company"); and

(2)     RANDALL DUANE HOLMES who resides at 36 Neustadt Lane, Chapaqua, NY
        10514, USA ("Associated Participant")

BACKGROUND

(A)     Under the CLPE Holdings Management Incentive Plan ("Plan") adopted by a
        resolution of the board of directors of the Company on 6 August 2003, a
        number of Associated Participants (as defined in the rules of the Plan)
        are entitled to a bonus payment which Is contingent on the Sale (as
        defined in the rules of the Plan) of the Company ("Bonus").

(B)     As at the date of this Deed, no Sale has taken place in respect of the
        Company.

(C)     The Associated Participant has agreed to waive his entitlement to a
        Bonus under the Plan in full.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS

1.      In consideration for the payment of (pound)1 (receipt of which is hereby
        acknowledged by the Associated Participant) the Associated Participant
        hereby waives all his interests in the Bonus and releases the Company
        from any obligation to make any payment under the Plan, whether such
        payment is contingent on a Sale or otherwise.

2.      The Associated Participant hereby undertakes not to seek to enforce the
        bonus or any rights granted pursuant to the Plan and agrees that the
        Associated Participant has no entitlement to any compensation (whether
        by damages or otherwise) for the waiver of the Bonus or any other rights
        granted pursuant to the Plan.



                                       1
<PAGE>

THIS DOCUMENT is executed as a deed and delivered on the date stated at the
beginning of this Deed.


SIGNED as a deed by                  )           /s/ Douglas R. Wilson
CLPE HOLDINGS LIMITED                )           ---------------------
acting by                            )           Director
a director and its secretary         )
or two directors                     )


                                     Director    /s/ Andrew T. West
                                                 ------------------




SIGNED as a deed by                  )  /s/ Randall Duane Holmes
RANDALL DUANE HOLMES                 )
in the presence of:                  )


Witness signature:  /s/ Douglas R. Wilson


Name:     Douglas R. Wilson
Address:  312  High Land Ave.
          Ridgewood, NJ 07450
Occupation: Energy Executive



                                       2
```

[111th Congress Public Law 111]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3023]]

Public Law 111-111
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  630 Northeast Killingsworth Avenue in Portland, Oregon, as the ``Dr. 
  Martin Luther King, Jr. Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2009 -  [S. 
                                1314]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 630 Northeast Killingsworth Avenue in Portland, Oregon, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Martin 
Luther King, Jr. Post Office''.

    Approved November 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1314 (H.R. 2971):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Aug. 4, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
No. 49488.

#### Protests 107926-K, etc., of Browne Vintners Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
### ISSUED: November 16, 2016 U.S. DEPARTI\1ENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC 

## DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

## ZOIL NOV 

## 11 A 3: t

## 0 In The Matter Of: ) ) ) ) ) D k N FAA 20 

## DOCKET OPERATIONS oc et o. - 14-f116 Pacific International Skydiving Center Respondent 

### SUBPOENA TO: Dennis King 810 Richards Street, Suite 700 Honolulu, HI 96813 Case No. 2014WP130012

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205(a)(3), YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify at a hearing scheduled to begin at the following place, date, and time: 

### 1. Location:

2. 

### Date: 3. 

### Time: United States District Court, District ofHawaii 300 Ala Moana Blvd. Honolulu, HI 96850 December 13, 2016 9:00 a.m. local time This subpoena is issued because the Respondent, Pacific International Skydiving Center, filed an application onNovember 12, 2016 requesting your presence to testify at this hearing. If youhave any questions about the subpoena, you should contact the Respondent's counsel at the address and telephone number listed below. The provisions of 14 C.F.R. § 13.228(b) allow youto file a motion to quash or modify this subpoenawiththe undersignedjudge. The applicant shall describe, indetail, the basis for the application to quash ormodify the subpoena including, but not limitedto, a statement thatthe testimony is not relevant to the proceeding orthat the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. A motion to quash or modify the subpoena will stay the effect ofthe subpoenapending a decision bythe undersignedjudge onthe motion. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.229, you are entitled to the same fees and mileage expenses as arepaidto witnesses appearing in the courts ofthe United States. These fees shall be paidbythe Respondent, the party at whose request you have been subpoenaed. Ifyou fail orrefuse to comply withthis subpoena, a party may, in accordance with 14 C.F.R § 13.228( c), apply to the local federal district court to seekjudicial enforcement ofthe subpoena.

Subpoena issued at the request of: Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 8900 SW 107th Avenue, Suite 203 Miami, FL 33176 TEL: 305-598-4841 FAX: 305-598-4842

Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 DOUGLAS M. RAWALD Administrative Law Judge

Subpoena, page 2
```

[111th Congress Public Law 114]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3026]]

Public Law 111-114
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To permit each current member of the Board of Directors of the Office of 
 Compliance to serve for 3 terms. <<NOTE: Dec. 14, 2009 -  [S. 1860]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 2 USC 1381 note.>> ADDITIONAL TERM FOR MEMBERS 
                              OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OFFICE OF 
                              COMPLIANCE.

    Notwithstanding the second sentence of section 301(e)(1) of the 
Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1381(e)(1)), any 
individual serving as a member of the Board of Directors of the Office 
of Compliance as of September 30, 2009, may serve for 3 terms.

    Approved December 14, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1860:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Nov. 5, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 19, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT THE UNDERSIGNED CONSTITUTES AND APPOINTS
TERENCE C. SEIKEL HIS TRUE AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND AGENT, WITH FULL
POWER OF SUBSTITUTION AND RESUBSTITUTION, FOR HIM AND IN HIS NAME, PLACE AND
STEAD, IN ANY AND ALL CAPACITIES, TO SIGN: (i) FORM 10-K BEING FILED ON OR ABOUT
THE DATE HEREOF BY ADVANCED ACCESSORY SYSTEMS, LLC, (THE "COMPANY"), (ii) ANY OR
ALL AMENDMENTS (INCLUDING POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENTS) TO THE COMPANY'S
REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND
DECLARED EFFECTIVE ON OR ABOUT JUNE 10, 1998, AND TO FILE THE SAME, WITH ALL
EXHIBITS THERETO, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (INCLUDING ANY
AMENDMENTS THERETO), WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, GRANTING UNTO
SAID ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND AGENT FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY TO DO AND PERFORM EACH
AND EVERY ACT AND THING REQUISITE AND NECESSARY TO BE DONE AS FULLY TO ALL
INTENTS AND PURPOSES AS HE MIGHT OR COULD DO IN PERSON, HEREBY RATIFYING AND
CONFIRMING ALL THAT SAID ATTORNEY-IN-FACT AND AGENT OR HIS SUBSTITUTE OR
SUBSTITUTES, MAY LAWFULLY DO OR CAUSE TO BE DONE BY VIRTUE HEREOF.




                                                   /s/ Marshall D. Gladchun
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Name:  Marshall D. Gladchun
                                                   Dated: March 12, 1999
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending February 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp. (the "Company") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey W. Griffiths, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/JEFFREY W. GRIFFITHSJeffrey W. Griffiths President and Chief Executive
Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 1,
2003

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit
      23.1**




[LETTERHEAD
      OF BDO]




**CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 The
        Board
        of Directors
 SmarTire
        Systems Inc.
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the 
registration  statements (Nos. 333-122098, 333-107904, 333-107903, 
333-93021,  333-80923,  333-67751, 333-55810 and 333-135713)  on
        Form S-8 of SmarTire  Systems Inc. (“the Company”) of our report
        dated  September 27, 2006, relating to the consolidated  financial
        statements of the Company appearing in the Company’s  Annual Report on Form
        10- KSB. Our report contains additional comments for U.S.
        readers on Canada - U.S. reporting differences that states
        that the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that
        cast
        substantial doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a
        going concern.  The financial statements do not include
        any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
        uncertainty.
 
 
 */s/
        BDO Dunwoody LLP*
  Chartered
        Accountants
  Vancouver,
        Canada
 October
        30, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ENACTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Third Wave Technologies, Inc. (the "Company) Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin Conroy, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Maneesh Arora, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C Section 1350, that on the date of this certification:

     (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

     (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Kevin Conroy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Kevin Conroy
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        May 4, 2006


                                        /s/ Maneesh Arora
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Maneesh Arora
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        May 4, 2006


                                       21
Contact:

Trent Palmer

Copter Kids, LLC

530.913.1313

trent@copterkidsllc.com

Copter Kids, LLC

Request for amendment to FAA 333 exemption

Exemption No. 13601

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2985
Contact:

Trent Palmer

Copter Kids, LLC

530.913.1313

trent@copterkidsllc.com

Date: December 21, 2015

Re: Exemption No. 13601

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2985

Copter Kids, LLC is requesting an amendment to their existing 333 

exemption as listed and described below. The purpose for the amendment is to 

be able to offer the services as listed in the existing 333 exemption. This

amendment will serve to increase the functionality and usefulness of UASs and 

the increased functionality will serve to create safer working environments in the 

industries in which they are deployed. 

Copter Kids would like to add two additional UAS to the existing 

exemption. The new crafts are quad-rotor layouts designed by DJI and have 

been widely used for operations under section 333 exemptions

Manufacturer: DJI

Models: Inspire 1 and Phantom 3

The Inspire 1 as well as Phantom 3 meet all weight, speed and other 

criteria spelled out in the 333 exemption.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ENACTED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Third Wave Technologies, Inc. (the "Company) Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John Puisis, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and David Nuti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                              /s/ John Puisis
                                              -------------------------------
                                              John Puisis
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              October 29, 2004

                                              /s/ David Nuti
                                              -------------------------------
                                              David Nuti
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              October 29, 2004

                                        3
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

w 0. MI*fl 

-.a- 
Iionorablo TomDeBerry - page g 

under the aantraot referred to abme. 

If, uader them olrOuamta?xse#, there 

oXlet 8uch an obli.gatiOn, what recourtse 

does WleBoerdharein enforoingitt" 

me letter of the Rlttoburpb mate Olags CoPp 

pny td whibh you refer It3 aa follas; 

'Pe am are thatyauhmebeennotifUdbyvar0uummfaoturers0fil~ 

odmta of the @orit~rue 08 Alcxndnum 

E' &%luetrlas other th8n i4stional Defense 

Projeota . 

aThe Oni recently wrote urn to wad fn 

aninwmto~ of sllAlandnrrnPoud8r a?@ 

Paetesohadcnhmd. Sevwaldayelater 

they wrote ua to aha 

lousb~Ildinggrojeo ? euader8onetruot&m. 

thbprterial to *orl &meoftkwAlu&axmrehd~nhandros 

tobeueedinfll3ingordar onocw contreot 

dth the4 M&e 8oami of Coatrolh Due to this 

Iatioaal demmd we will not be able to fulfill 

our canPaat,butre are BUP~ you O&n appreoiabe our poldaon 4.a this 24uhtter. 

*If you th&nlK it liMoable, w3 sballbe 

glad to notify eaoh Xnstitufion by m*;il to 

the effect that we will mat be able to raPte 

further atxlpnte of Alma&am Powder to them.' 

~~1~1s &st andrill not do aninjmtieebetmen part&es to a aontrsot by oompelling tbem to * perSoraeutae, where the law 1teelf has mpmve?md to We the 

performwmsi~~poueible orilleg~l. Blab a OozitMhctupon 

the la+6 euper~a3lng to pmvext its performswe is at 611 

end, dthout fkrther obllgatfon or liability upon the pPrt 

of either party thereto. 

Verforuiiuss le not Luoueedby thefaot 

tbet the oontractt could not legally be performed antler the law aa it suioted when the 

ooxrtraot was mu&o, f 

SuHled to kuow the
Exhibit 99.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Rubicon Minerals Corporation (the"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Michael J. Gray, the Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, Vice-President,Exploration and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

> 
1.The Report fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and 
2.The information contained in the    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition    and results of operations of the Company.
   "Michael J. Gray"                                                    Michael J. Gray                             Secretary, Chief Financial Officer,                             Vice-President, Exploration and                             Director                             June 30, 2003
 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 96-7106.

#### Fitzgerald *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Cer-tiorari denied.