# C_2012343EN.01002301.xml

| 10.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/23

---

Action brought on 6 September 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-93/12)

2012/C 343/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Director of the OIL of 1 December 2011 not to renew the applicant’s appointment, which therefore ended on 15 January 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Director of the OIL of 1 December 2011 not to renew the applicant’s appointment, which therefore ended on 15 January 2012;

| — | Annul in so far as necessary the decision confirming that decision stemming from the Director’s letter of 6 February 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul in so far as necessary the decision confirming that decision stemming from the Director’s letter of 6 February 2012;

| — | Order the Commission to pay to him, as compensation for the damage to his career as from 15 January to 30 June 2012, a sum corresponding to the difference between the net remuneration which would have been payable to him at the OIL and the net unemployment benefit which he received, provisionally assessed at EUR 11 309, and to pay on his behalf to the Community pension scheme the contributions corresponding to the remuneration which he should have received; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay to him, as compensation for the damage to his career as from 15 January to 30 June 2012, a sum corresponding to the difference between the net remuneration which would have been payable to him at the OIL and the net unemployment benefit which he received, provisionally assessed at EUR 11 309, and to pay on his behalf to the Community pension scheme the contributions corresponding to the remuneration which he should have received;

| — | Order the applicant’s appointment at the OIL to be renewed for an indefinite period, with effect from the date on which his present appointment comes to an end; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the applicant’s appointment at the OIL to be renewed for an indefinite period, with effect from the date on which his present appointment comes to an end;

| — | In the alternative, order the Commission to pay to him, as compensation for the damage to his career which he would otherwise suffer as from that date, the difference between the remuneration and the pension rights which he would have acquired if his appointment at the OIL had been renewed for an indefinite period and the remuneration or income which serves as a substitute for it and the pension which he might otherwise have received; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, order the Commission to pay to him, as compensation for the damage to his career which he would otherwise suffer as from that date, the difference between the remuneration and the pension rights which he would have acquired if his appointment at the OIL had been renewed for an indefinite period and the remuneration or income which serves as a substitute for it and the pension which he might otherwise have received;

| — | Order the Commission to pay to him a sum of EUR 5 000 as compensation for the non-material damage which resulted from the fact that his appointment at the OIL was not renewed; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay to him a sum of EUR 5 000 as compensation for the non-material damage which resulted from the fact that his appointment at the OIL was not renewed;

| — | Order the Commission to pay to him a sum of EUR 5 000 as compensation for the non-material damage caused him by the unlawful nature of his evaluation report for 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay to him a sum of EUR 5 000 as compensation for the non-material damage caused him by the unlawful nature of his evaluation report for 2010;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---