alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1869 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1869

  To terminate the Economic Development Administration, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 15, 2011

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To terminate the Economic Development Administration, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``EDA Elimination Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) Termination.--The Economic Development Administration is 
terminated.
    (b) Repeal.--The Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 
(42 U.S.C. 3121 et seq.) is repealed.
    (c) Conclusion of Business.--The Secretary of Commerce shall take 
such actions as are necessary to conclude the outstanding affairs of 
the Economic Development Administration, including dispositions of 
personnel, assets, and obligations.
    (d) No Effect on the Expenditure of Funds.--Nothing in this section 
prevents the expenditure of any funds received before the effective 
date of this Act.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on the first day of the first fiscal 
year beginning after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
(logo)
ERNST& YOUNG LLP
Suite 1700
555  California Street
San  Francisco, California 94104
Phone: 415 951 3000

                        Report of Independent Accountants

Mr. Andrew D. Woodward
President
BankAmerica Mortgage, a Division of Bank of America, FSB

We have examined  management's  assertion,  included in the accompanying  report
titled Report of  Management,  that Bank of America FSB (the  Company)  complied
with  the  minimum  servicing  standards  set  forth  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP) during the year ended December 31, 1998.  Management is  responsible  for
the Company's  compliance  with those  requirements.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on  management's  assertions  about the Company's  compliance
based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's compliance with those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal  determination on the
Company's compliance with specified requirements.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion,  that the Company  complied  with the
aforementioned  requirements  during the year ended December 31, 1998, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

Ernstt + Young LLP

January 29, 1999



Ernst   &Young   LLP  is  a  member  of  Ernst   &Young
International, Ltd.
### Water resources of Grant and Hot Spring Counties, Arkansas

By: Henry N. HalbergCharles T. BryantMarion S. Hines

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1857

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
(Reap. Dec. 9885)

#### Naftone International Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 796936.

(Decided December 29, 1960)

*Eugene It. Piclcrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Oochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been limited, under the terms of a written stipulation of submission, to certain cameras, represented by the invoice items marked “A” and checked “WE,” which were exported from West Germany and entered at the port of New York.

The agreed set of facts, upon which the case is before me, establishes that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is deutsche marks 238 each, less 46.82 per centum, packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of T

. J ., a child, * From the 91st District Court

of Eastland County

Trial Court No. CV1844944

.

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 259

- C V * February 13 , 20 20

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, we

reverse the trial court’s order insofar as it ter minated the parental rights of T.J.’s

mother, and we remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Any

proceeding on remand must be commenced within 180 days of this court’s

mandate.
# C_2012200EN.01002101.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/21

---

Action brought on 30 March 2012 — ZZ v EIGE

(Case F-43/12)

2012/C 200/43

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: T. Bontinck, S. Woog, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Institute for Gender Equality

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the EIGE refusing the applicant’s request to be paid a management allowance for the period from 1 June 2010 to 30 September 2011.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 12 January 2012 of the Director of the EIGE refusing the applicant’s request to be paid a management allowance for the period from 1 June 2010 to 30 September 2011, confirmed, following the applicant’s complaint, by the decision of 27 February 2012 of the human resources officer of the EIGE; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 12 January 2012 of the Director of the EIGE refusing the applicant’s request to be paid a management allowance for the period from 1 June 2010 to 30 September 2011, confirmed, following the applicant’s complaint, by the decision of 27 February 2012 of the human resources officer of the EIGE;

| — | order payment of the management allowance for the period from 1 June 2010 to 30 September 2011, together with interest on account of late payment the amount of which must be calculated at the rate laid down by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points, with effect from 30 September 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

order payment of the management allowance for the period from 1 June 2010 to 30 September 2011, together with interest on account of late payment the amount of which must be calculated at the rate laid down by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points, with effect from 30 September 2011;

| — | order the European Institute for Gender Equality to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Institute for Gender Equality to pay the costs.

---
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Actiga Corporation - Exhibit 10.11






ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

OF 

ACTIGA CORPORATION 

(the “Company”)

	TO: 	QMOTIONS, INC. (“QMotions”) 
	  	  
	RE: 	Assumption of Employment Agreements by and
      among QMotions and Dale 
	  	Hutchins, and QMotions and Amro Albanna
    
	 	 


     Upon the effectiveness of the
merger between QMotions and QMotions Acquisition Corp., Actiga Corporation shall
assume all of QMotions’ obligations under each of (i) the employment agreement
dated December 15, 2007 by and among Dale Hutchins and QMotions; (ii) the
employment agreement dated December 15, 2007 by and among Amro Albanna and
QMotions; attached hereto as Exhibits A and B, respectively.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has signed the Certificate this 9th day of January, 2008.

ACTIGA CORPORATION

	 	By:	/s/
      Steve Bajic 
	 	 	STEVE BAJIC 
	 	 	Director, President, Secretary and Treasurer
  






Exhibit A

2




Exhibit B

3
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, PETER W. CURRIE, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2004 of NortelNetworks Limited; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: March 18, 2005   /s/ PETER W. CURRIE     PETER W. CURRIE
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1754 

To promote clean energy infrastructure for rural communities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 20, 2011 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. HARKIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. BENNET) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To promote clean energy infrastructure for rural 

communities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Transmission 

5 for Rural Communities Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRANSMISSION FOR RENEWABLES. 

7 (a) CLARIFICATION OF QUALIFIED FACILITIES FOR

8 CLEAN RENEWABLE ENERGY BONDS.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 54C(d)(1) of the In10 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by insertVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:41 Oct 22, 2011 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1754.IS S1754

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1754 IS

1 ing ‘‘, or a facility primarily for the purpose of inter2 connecting one or more such qualified facilities to a 

3 high-voltage transmission line’’ after ‘‘electric com4 pany’’. 

5 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

6 by this subsection shall apply to bonds issued after 

7 the date of enactment of this Act. 

8 (b) TAX-EXEMPT FINANCING OF CERTAIN ELECTRIC

9 TRANSMISSION FACILITIES.— 

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 

11 142 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend12 ed— 

13 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of para14 graph (14), 

15 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

16 paragraph (15) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and 

17 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

18 paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(16) qualified electric transmission facilities.’’. 

20 (2) DEFINITION.—Section 142 of such Code is 

21 amended by adding at the end the following new 

22 subsection: 

23 ‘‘(n) QUALIFIED ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION FACILI24 TIES.— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1754 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection 

2 (a)(16), the term ‘qualified electric transmission fa3 cility’ means any electric transmission facility which 

4 is— 

5 ‘‘(A) owned by— 

6 ‘‘(i) a State or political subdivision of 

7 a State, or any agency, authority, or in8 strumentality of any of the foregoing, pro9 viding electric service directly or indirectly 

10 to the public, or 

11 ‘‘(ii) a State or political subdivision of 

12 a State expressly authorized under State 

13 law to finance and own electric trans14 mission facilities, and 

15 ‘‘(B) primarily for the purpose of inter16 connecting one or more renewable energy facili17 ties to a high-voltage transmission line. 

18 ‘‘(2) TERMINATION.—Subsection (a)(16) shall 

19 not apply with respect to any bond issued after De20 cember 31, 2012.’’. 

21 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

22 by this subsection shall apply to bonds issued after 

23 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Millennium Capital Venture Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Mario Drolet, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: December 19, 2003 | By: /s/ Mario DroletName: Mario DroletTitle: President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 96-6033.

#### Langford *v.*LeCureux, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Betty Jean HARGROVE, etc. v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, etc. et al.

No. 98-CC-2715.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Hargrove, Betty Jean Etc;— Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Jefferson Davis 31st Judicial District Court Numbers C-129-97, C-716-97; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CW98-1442.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J. would grant the writ.

KIMBALL, J. not on panel.
# C_2012165EN.01002601.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/26

---

Action brought on 28 March 2012 — Teva Pharma and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe v EMA

(Case T-140/12)

2012/C 165/45

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Teva Pharma BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: D. Anderson, QC (Queen’s Counsel), K. Bacon, Barrister, G. Morgan and C. Drew, Solicitors)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the European Medicines Agency, contained in its letter of 24 January 2012, refusing to validate the applicants’ application for a marketing authorisation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Medicines Agency, contained in its letter of 24 January 2012, refusing to validate the applicants’ application for a marketing authorisation;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the applicants’ costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the applicants’ costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on one plea in law, alleging that the refusal to validate their application for the authorisation of a generic version of an orphan medicinal product is contrary to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 (1) properly interpreted. In particular, it is contrary to the wording and effect of Article 8, as well as the policy underlying the said regulation and its travaux préparatoires, to exclude a generic version of an orphan medicinal product from the market for more than the ten year period stipulated in Article 8(1) of the said regulation. The applicants further allege that Article 8(3) permits an authorisation for a similar product to be granted during that 10 year period, by way of derogation from Article 8(1), in certain specified circumstances. Such authorisation should not, however, have the effect of extending the 10 year market exclusivity for the first orphan product.

1

travaux préparatoires

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (OJ 2000 L 18, p. 1)

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Troop Support Indo-Pacific warfighter support

By John Dwyer IIIDLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                PHILADELPHIA  –              
As a field activity of the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support headquartered in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Indo-Pacific works directly with customers and industry partners to support the military during day-to-day operations, humanitarian assistance and contingency missions. These photos represent some of the warfighter support they have provided throughout the region over the March 3-14 timeframe.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DoDDepartment of DefenseDefense Logistics AgencyDLADLA Troop SupportTroop SupportDLA Troop Support Indo-PacificTroop Support Indo-Pacific