alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Datalink Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles B. Westling,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ CHARLES B. WESTLING

CharlesB. Westling

President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 31, 2006

----

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Datalink Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory T. Barnum,Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2003, that to my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ GREGORY T. BARNUM

GregoryT. Barnum

Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  March 31,2006

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended  Quarterly Report of Infinity Capital Group, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending  September 30, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Amended Report") I, Gregory H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Amended Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 31, 2007


/s/Gregory H. Laborde
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer and President


This certification accompanies the Amended Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE 1999 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          26,993
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         463,963
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                38,170
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    158,776
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         158,776
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           158,776
<LOANS>                                        382,834
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 655,184
<DEPOSITS>                                     554,820
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,750
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,478
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 655,184
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 32,790
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,009
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     1
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                44,800
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              17,256
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,776
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,024
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       86
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (60)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 21,869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,638
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,502
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,502
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,677
<LOANS-PAST>                                       167
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    32
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,308
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      803
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,382
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,573
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,573
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,102


</TABLE>
#### The Augusta Oil, Gas, Mining *&*Prospecting Company v. The Independence Drilling Company, a *Partnership, etc., et al.*

No. 15,785.

*Evidence*— Opinion *Testimony*— Province *of the Jury.*It was error to permit a witness to give an opinion upon a fact which it was the province of the jury to determine.

Error from Butler district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.

Opinion filed May 8, 1909.

Reversed.

*George J. Benson,*and *T. A. Kramer,*for the plaintiff in error.

*Lelancl & Harris,*and *E. J. Lambert,*for the defendants in error.

*Per Curiam:*

The drilling company contracted with, the oil company to drill a well. The oil company was to furnish the casing and other appliances, while the duty of inspection of the appliances devolved on the drilling company. Before the well was completed it became obstructed so that it could not be drilled further, and the drilling company sought to recover for the work done, on the theory that the suspension of work was due to the fault of the oil company. On one side it was claimed that the casing furnished was not sufficiently thick and strong to withstand the pressure of the water, and that it collapsed and obstructed the drilling of the well. On the other side it was claimed, among other things, that the obstruction was below the disc in the well, where the pressure of the water on the inside counterbalanced the pressure from the outside, and that the trouble was not because of insufficient casing but was due to some defect or irregularity in drilling the well.

»In the trial a witness was asked the question, “What, in your judgment, was the trouble; was that in the *262*bottom of*this well?” And over objection he answered: “That casing caused the trouble; it was too light.” The admission of this evidence was material error. The witness had had experience in drilling wells and was competent to testify to the strength of the pipe, the extent of the pressure it would withstand, and the like, and also as to the way the drill and other appliances worked when he tested them, and the jury might have inferred from this and other testimony the cause of the trouble; but he should not have been permitted to give an opinion on the issue the jury were called to decide.

> “The opinion of witnesses is only admissible upon the ground of necessity, but can never be given upon the ultimate facts which it is the duty of the jury to determine.” *(Erb v. Popritz,*59 Kan. 264, 270.)

(See, also, *K. P. Rly. Co. v. Peavey,*29 Kan. 169; *Telephone Co. v. Vandervort,*67 Kan. 269.)

As the admission of this testimony was prejudicial error, it is unnecessary to consider the other assignments. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
§1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Network 1 Financial Group,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Hunt, Acting Chief Accounting Officer (principal financial officer) hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: October 21, 2011 | /s/ William Hunt                   
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------
|                       | William Hunt                       
|                       | Acting Principal Accounting Officer
# C_2013032EN.01002702.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/27

---

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2012 — Viasat Broadcasting UK v Commission

(Case T-210/12) (1)

1

2013/C 32/48

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, McClanahan and Senior Judge Willis 

BARBARA D. BOYD 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 1355-06-2 PER CURIAM 

 NOVEMBER 21, 2006 

VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND 

T.J. Markow, Judge 

 (Barbara D. Boyd, pro se, on briefs). 

 (Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General; Elizabeth B. Peay, 

Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. 

 Barbara D. Boyd appeals a decision of the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond affirming 

the decision of the Virginia Employment Commission (VEC) finding Boyd disqualified for 

unemployment compensation because she left work voluntarily without good cause. The circuit 

court rejected Boyd’s argument that the VEC’s decision should be reversed because the VEC 

committed intrinsic fraud by failing to provide Boyd with a fair hearing. We have reviewed the 

record and the circuit court’s decision and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we 

affirm the circuit court’s decision for the reasons set forth in its March 27, 2006 opinion and 

order. We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not 

aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.1

 Affirmed.

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

1

 The VEC’s motion to dismiss is denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Minerals Management Service 

# AGENCY:

Minerals Management Service, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of the proposed notice of sale for proposed Sale 205. 

# SUMMARY:

The MMS announces the availability of the proposed Notice of Sale for proposed Sale 205 in the Central GOM OCS. This Notice is published pursuant to 30 CFR 256.29(c) as a matter of information to the public. With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, provides the affected States the opportunity to review the proposed Notice. The proposed Notice sets forth the proposed terms and conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, royalty rates, and rentals. 

# DATES:

                        Comments on the size, timing, or location of proposed Sale 205 are due from the affected States within 60 days following their receipt of the proposed Notice. The final Notice of Sale will be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid opening is currently scheduled for October 3, 2007.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The proposed Notice of Sale for Sale 205 and a “Proposed Sale Notice Package” containing information essential to potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, Gulf of Mexico Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 736-2519. 

Dated: May 16, 2007. 

R.M. “Johnnie” Burton, 

Director, Minerals Management Service.

[FR Doc. E7-9722 Filed 5-16-07; 1:26 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
No. 44344.

#### Protest 8868-K of Balfour, Guthrie & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of *Balfour*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 55, affirming C. D. 58), the protest was overruled.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated November 28, 2006, and published in the Federal 
Register on December 7, 2006, (71 FR 70988), Rhodes Technologies, 498 
Washington Street, Coventry, Rhode Island 02816, made application by 
letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as 
a bulk manufacturer of Oxymorphone (9652), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance in 
bulk for conversion and sale to dosage form manufacturers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Rhodes Technologies to manufacture the listed basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Rhodes Technologies to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-9614 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# C_2013147EN.01003503.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/35

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 March 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-131/12)

(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Lawyer’s hand-written signature different from that on the original application received by post - Action lodged out of time - Manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 147/68

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the refusal to pay compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of his having been retired, together with a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay his own costs.

---
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                               State of
                                                                                           Incorporation or
                                                                           Percent of      Organization of
            Parent                              Subsidiary                 Ownership            Parent
            ------                              ----------                 ----------     ------------------
<S>                                     <C>                                 <C>            <C>
Hudson River Bancorp, Inc.              Hudson River Bank & Trust             100%            Delaware
                                        Company

Hudson River Bank & Trust Company       Hudson City Associates, Inc.          100%            New York

Hudson River Bank & Trust Company       Hudson River Mortgage                 100%            New York
                                        Corporation

Hudson River Bank & Trust Company       Hudson River Funding Corp.           99.9%            New York

Hudson River Bank & Trust Company       Hudson City Centre, Inc.              100%            New York

Hudson River Bank & Trust Company       SSLA Services Corp.                   100%            New York
--------------------------------------- ------------------------------- ----------------- ------------------
</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of IWT Tesoro Corporation, certify that:

 

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of IWT TesoroCorporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004;

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisannual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

----

 

6.          I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: May 14, 2004 | By:                                    | /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|               | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.,                 |
|               | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----