alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 100 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29141-29142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER06-615-000]


California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
FERC Staff Attendance

May 17, 2007.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that on May 23-25, 2007 members of its staff will attend the 
California Independent System Operator's (CAISO) training program 
entitled, ``Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade (MRTU) Bid-to-Bill 
Training.'' This training covers the MRTU market process timeline, 
bids, settlements, and billing, and will be held at the CAISO, 151 Blue 
Ravine Road, Folsom, CA. The agenda and other documents for the 
training are available on the CAISO's Web site, http://www.caiso.com.

[[Page 29142]]

    This training is sponsored by the CAISO and is open to interested 
parties and market participants. Commission staff attendance is part of 
its ongoing training activities. The training may discuss matters at 
issue in the above captioned docket.
    For further information, contact Steven Michals at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fd8e89988b9893d390949e959c918ebd9b988f9ed39a928b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5221263724373c7c3f3b313a333e2112343720317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>; (202) 502-6373.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9989 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael L. Hirschey, the Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer of
OneSource Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of OneSource Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of OneSource Technologies, Inc.



         Date: May 16, 2005              /s/ Michael L. Hirschey
                                         ------------------------------
                                        Michael L. Hirschey
                                        Chairman, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer


     I, Leonard J. Ksobiech , the Chief Financial Officer of OneSource
Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of OneSource Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of OneSource Technologies, Inc.



         Date: May 16, 2005             /s/ Leonard J. Ksobiech
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Leonard J. Ksobiech
                                        Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001057695
<NAME>                        INTERNATIONAL SMART SOURCING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,992,265
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,149,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (11,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    787,331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,216,690
<PP&E>                                         5,214,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,547,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,419,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,695,448
<BONDS>                                        699,144
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,383
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,021,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,419,167
<SALES>                                        4,919,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,919,095
<CGS>                                          3,631,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,631,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,306,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             201,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,039,678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (70,310)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,969,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,969,368)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.67)



</TABLE>
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.2

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                         StarMedia Argentina Sociedad de
                         Responsabilidad Limitada (SRL)
                             Buenos Aires, Argentina

                            StarMedia do Brasil Ltda.
                                Sao Paulo, Brazil

                        StarMedia Mobile do Brasil Ltda.
                                Sao Paulo, Brazil

                        Servicios Interactivos Limitada,
                                 Santiago, Chile

                            StarMedia Chile Limitada
                                 Santiago, Chile

                      StarMedia Colombia Ltda., Sociedad de
                            Responsabilidad Limitada
                                Bogota, Colombia

                           SMN de Mexico, Sociedad de
                      Responsabilidad Limitada (S. de R.L.)
                               Mexico City, Mexico

                         Servicios Star Mexico, Sociedad
de Responsabilidad Limitada de Capital Variable Mexico City, Mexico

AdNet S.A. de C.V.
                               Mexico City, Mexico

                             StarMedia Network, S.L.
                                  Madrid, Spain

StarMedia Network Americas, Sociedad Anonima (S.A.) Montevideo, Uruguay

StarMedia Sociedad de Responsabilidad Limitada S.R.L.
                               Montevideo, Uruguay

                                StarMedia S.R.L.
                               Caracas, Venezuela

                          StarMedia Mobile (USA), Inc.
                                    Delaware

                          StarMedia Mobile (BVI), Inc.
                             British Virgin Islands
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Rose M. Robeson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Duke Energy Field
Services, LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: August 10, 2004
    /s/ Rose M. RobesonRose M. RobesonVice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.1

THE HACKETT GROUP, INC.

LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                      |  |                  
|------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|THE HACKETT GROUP, INC. SUBSIDIARIES  |  | JURISDICTION     
|                                      | 
|The Hackett Group Australia Pty. Ltd. |  | Australia        
|Scott Mednick & Associates            |  | California       
|Answerthink Ltd.                      |  | Canada           
|The Hackett Group Canada, Inc.        |  | Canada           
|EZ Commerce Global Solutions, Inc.    |  | Delaware         
|Resource Evaluation, Inc.             |  | Delaware         
|THINK New Ideas, Inc.                 |  | Delaware         
|triSpan, Inc.                         |  | Delaware         
|Archstone Acquisition Corporation     |  | Florida          
|Beacon Analytics, Inc.                |  | Florida          
|CFT Consulting, Inc.                  |  | Florida          
|Epic Acquisition Corporation          |  | Florida          
|GCSB Acquisition Corporation          |  | Florida          
|The Hackett Group, Inc.               |  | Florida          
|Resource Evaluation SAS               |  | France           
|REL Consultancy Group GmbH            |  | Germany          
|The Hackett Group GmbH                |  | Germany          
|Infinity Consulting Group, Inc.       |  | Indiana          
|REL Consultancy Group SRL             |  | Italy            
|Advis Acquisition Corporation         |  | Massachusetts    
|Legacy Technology, Inc.               |  | Massachusetts    
|The Hackett Group BV                  |  | Netherlands      
|Delphi Partners, Inc.                 |  | New Jersey       
|On Ramp, Inc.                         |  | New York         
|SD Goodman Group, Inc.                |  | New York         
|The Hackett Group, Inc.               |  | Ohio             
|Group Cortex, Inc.                    |  | Pennsylvania     
|Hackett Group (India) Ltd.            |  | Republic of India
|REL Consultancy PTE Limited           |  | Singapore        
|REL Consultancy Group SL              |  | Spain            
|The Hackett Group (Suisse) AG         |  | Switzerland      
|Hackett-REL Limited                   |  | United Kingdom   
|REL Consultancy Group Limited         |  | United Kingdom   
|Resource Evaluation Limited           |  | United Kingdom   
|The Hackett Group Limited             |  | United Kingdom
Searched for **http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/isab/isab2001-5/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/isab/isab2001-5/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

582
KA 16-00048

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DOUGLAS C. TATNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY F. DUGUAY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Christopher S. Ciaccio, J.), entered November 10, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq. ), defendant contends that reversal is required because County Court applied the wrong burden of proof when it determined that the People had “shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that an upward departure in the risk level classification [was] warranted.” We agree with defendant that the court applied the wrong standard inasmuch as it is well settled that “the People cannot obtain an upward departure pursuant to the guidelines unless they prove the existence of certain aggravating circumstances by clear and convincing evidence” ( People v Gillotti , 23 NY3d 841, 862). Nevertheless, “remittal is not required because the record is sufficient to enable us to determine under the proper standard whether the court erred” in granting the People’s request for an upward departure ( People v Loughlin , 145 AD3d 1426, 1427-1428).

We conclude that the court properly determined that an upward departure was warranted. “A court may make an upward departure from a presumptive risk level when, after consideration of the indicated factors[,] . . . [the court determines that] there exists an aggravating or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, not otherwise adequately taken into account by the [risk assessment] guidelines” ( People v Abraham , 39 AD3d 1208, 1209 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, the People established by clear and convincing-2- 582
KA 16-00048

evidence the existence of numerous aggravating factors not adequately taken into account by the risk assessment guidelines, includingdefendant’s “constant masturbation,” which was “indicative of hypersexuality”; his “self-reported addiction” to child pornography; and the nature of the images, i.e., the sadomasochistic images of child pornography found on his computer ( see People v Sczerbaniewicz , 126 AD3d 1348, 1349; see also People v Guyette , 140 AD3d 1555, 1556-1557; People v Lashway , 66 AD3d 662, 662-663).

Entered: April 28, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
No. 54991.

#### Mundex Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 159512-K and 159513-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2012319EN.01001102.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/11

---

Action brought on 6 August 2012 — Premiere Polish v OHIM — Donau Kanol (ECOFORCE)

(Case T-361/12)

2012/C 319/21

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Premiere Polish Co., Ltd (Cheltenham, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Jones and M. Carter, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Donau Kanol GmbH & Co KG (Ried im Traunkreis, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 June 2012 in case R 851/2011-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 June 2012 in case R 851/2011-4;

| — | Allow the applicant’s Community trade mark application No 8777005 in its entirety or in the alternative, the proceedings be remitted to the Board of Appeal; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Allow the applicant’s Community trade mark application No 8777005 in its entirety or in the alternative, the proceedings be remitted to the Board of Appeal; and

| — | Order the Office to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ECOFORCE’ for goods in class 3 — Community trade mark application No 8777005

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 7243173 of the figurative mark ‘ECO FORTE’ for goods in classes 1, 3 and 5

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2014315EN.01002301.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/23

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany)) — Thi Ly Pham v Stadt Schweinfurt, Amt für Meldewesen und Statistik

(Case C-474/13) (1)

1

((Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2008/115/EC - Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals - Article 16(1) - Detention for the purpose of removal - Detention in prison accommodation - Possibility of detaining a third-country national with ordinary prisoners where he has given his consent))

2014/C 315/34

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Thi Ly Pham

Applicant:

Defendant: Stadt Schweinfurt, Amt für Meldewesen und Statistik

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second sentence of Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals must be interpreted as not permitting a Member State to detain a third-country national for the purpose of removal in prison accommodation together with ordinary prisoners even if the third-country national consents thereto.

---

(1)  OJ C 336, 16.11.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jose
Araque, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By:  /s/ Jose Araque
     ------------------------------------
     Jose Araque, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 15, 2006
EXPERT
      CONSENT











March
      31, 2008





Rubicon
      Minerals
      Corporation


Suite
      1540 – 800 West Pender
      Street,


Vancouver,
      B.C.


V6C
      2V6





United
      States Securities and Exchange
      Commission





Dear
      Sirs/Mesdames:





Re:           
      Rubicon
      Minerals Corporation(the
“Company”)





This
      letter is being filed as the
      consent ofTerry
      Burseyto being named in
      Annual Information Form of the “Company” dated March 31, 2008 and to the
      inclusion by reference to the report prepared by me entitled “Annual
      Information
      Form of Rubicon Minerals Corporation” (the “Reports”) and of extracts from
      or a summary of the Reports in the written disclosure contained in the
      prospectus or any other documents incorporated by reference
      therein.





I
      hereby confirm that I have read the
      written disclosure of the Reports and extracts from or a summary of the Reports
      contained in the Annual Information Form and have no reason to believe that
      there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that
      (i)
      are derived from the Reports, or (ii) are within the knowledge of the
      undersigned as a result of the services performed by the undersigned in
      connection with the Reports.





I
      hereby expressly consent to the filing
      of this consent with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as
      part of the Company’s Form 40-F, filed on March 31, 2008, and any amendment
      thereto.





Sincerely,





/s/“Terry
      Bursey”


Terry
      Bursey, P.
      Geo.





Location:  Red
      Lake,
      Ontario


Date:
      March 31, 2008