alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012273EN.01001302.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/13

---

Action brought on 26 June 2012 — EI du Pont de Nemours v OHIM — Zueco Ruiz (ZYTEL)

(Case T-288/12)

2012/C 273/23

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: EI du Pont de Nemours and Company (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Enrique Zueco Ruiz (Zaragoza, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 March 2012 in case R 464/2011-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 March 2012 in case R 464/2011-2; and

| — | Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘ZYTEL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 12 and 37

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 369314, of the word mark ‘ZYTEL’, for goods in classes 1 and 17; Well-known mark ‘ZYTEL’, for goods in classes 1 and 17

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1859 

To provide that sections 3330a, 3330b, and 3330c of title 5, United States 

Code, relating to administrative and judicial redress and remedies for 

preference eligibles, shall apply with respect to the Federal Aviation 

Administration and the Transportation Security Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2011 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide that sections 3330a, 3330b, and 3330c of title 

5, United States Code, relating to administrative and 

judicial redress and remedies for preference eligibles, 

shall apply with respect to the Federal Aviation Administration and the Transportation Security Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL REDRESS AND 

4 REMEDIES FOR PREFERENCE ELIGIBLES. 

5 Section 3330a of title 5, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1859 IS

1 ‘‘(f) For purposes of this section and sections 3330b 

2 and 3330c, the Federal Aviation Administration and the 

3 Transportation Security Administration are agencies. This 

4 section and sections 3330b and 3330c shall apply to any 

5 individual who is a preference eligible with respect to the 

6 Federal Aviation Administration and the Transportation 

7 Security Administration.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of

Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Global-Tech Advanced Innovations Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to
such officers knowledge, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the
Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form
20-F.

Date: August 31, 2011



/s/ John C.K. ShamJohn C.K. ShamPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Innovation by 3D Printing: The call for “Disruptive Thinkers” is Being Answered

By Cpl. George Melendez III MEF Information Group

                CAMP HANSEN, OKINAWA, Japan  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Additive Manufacturing3D printingparts
#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6839.

Entry No. 704531.

Invoice dated London, England, July 3, 1942.

Certified July 6, 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 24, 1942.

(Decided February 5, 1947)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawbence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of'said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1826

___________

Amarjeet Singh, also known as *

Rajinder Singh, *

* Petition for Review of

Petitioner, * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

v. *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General *

of the United States, *

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: October 27, 2010

Filed: October 29, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Amarjeet Singh, also known as Rajinder Singh, petitions for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s

denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we

conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. See Rodriguez-Cuate v. Gonzales,

444 F.3d 1015, 1018-19 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Accordingly, we deny

the petition for review.
(Reap. Dec. 9891)

#### The Geo. Rackle & Sons Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 844351.

(Decided December 29, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When this appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Associates recycle 7 tons during Shred Day event

By Dana ThornburyDSCC Environmetnal Office

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Stories

Go Green at DSCC

DLA L&MEnvironment L&MPeople & Culture L&M
State Plan Frameworks 

State Acts• 

Alone • 

Compliance through in-state actions with 

no coordination with other states. 

Choices . Entire responsibility on EGUs? 

· Obligation on whom? 

· EE. RE. 1:1nd oH~e.- non·E6U rni.'~"'Ut<.':.? 

· Averaghg. markets? • 

Less Coordination 

Specific • ::• 

Agreement 

Individual state plans with provisions that 

address specific issues. 

Ex. Cross-border impncts of EE nnd RE. 

Service 

Territory 

Multi-state collaboration around an existing 

sys tem-e.g., utility balancing area or RTO/ 

ISO footprint. Other EGUs covered by 

separate plan components. 

Common 

Elements 

al!l 

•• 

A state plan specifies criteria for recognized 

credits (MWh or C02) it will recognize. EGUs 

can use qualifying credits for compliance, 

regardless of state of origin. 

Regional 

Plan 

•• l:loA . 

• 

Regionally negotiated com pi iance plan that may 

include a regionally designated credit, 

administrative body, tracking system, 

exchange, and other elements. 

More Coordination 
one 

Compliance through in-state actions with 

no coordination with other states. 

Choices · Entire responsibility on EGUs? 

·Obligation on whom? 

• EE, RE, and other non-EGU measures? 

• Averaging, markets? 
• 

ec1 c 

ree en 

Individual state plans with provisions that 

address specific issues. 

Ex. Cross-border impacts of EE and RE. 
• 

erv1ce 

• 

err1 or 

Multi-state collaboration around an existing 

system-e.g., utility balancing area or RTO/ 

ISO footprint. Other EGUs covered by 

separate plan components. 
A state plan specifies criteria for recognized 

credits (MWh or C02) it will recognize. EGUs 

can use qualifying credits for compliance, 

regardless of state of origin. 



State Plan Frameworks 

State Acts• 

Alone • 

Compliance through in-state actions with 

no coordination with other states. 

Choices . Entire responsibility on EGUs? 

· Obligation on whom? 

· EE. RE. 1:1nd oH~e.- non·E6U rni.'~"'Ut<.':.? 

· Averaghg. markets? • 

Less Coordination 

Specific • ::• 

Agreement 

Individual state plans with provisions that 

address specific issues. 

Ex. Cross-border impncts of EE nnd RE. 

Service 

Territory 

Multi-state collaboration around an existing 

sys tem-e.g., utility balancing area or RTO/ 

ISO footprint. Other EGUs covered by 

separate plan components. 

Common 

Elements 

al!l 

•• 

A state plan specifies criteria for recognized 

credits (MWh or C02) it will recognize. EGUs 

can use qualifying credits for compliance, 

regardless of state of origin. 

Regional 

Plan 

•• l:loA . 

• 

Regionally negotiated com pi iance plan that may 

include a regionally designated credit, 

administrative body, tracking system, 

exchange, and other elements. 

More Coordination
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. listed below of our reportsdated December 8, 2005, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. Jacuzzi Brands,Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Jacuzzi Brands,Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended September 30, 2005. •     Registration Statement No. 333-84461 on Form S-3, as    amended, dated August 17, 1999 and related Prospectus  •     Registration Statement No. 333-111479 on Form S-4, as    amended, dated January 9, 2004 and related Prospectus  •     Registration Statement No. 333-47101 on Form S-4, as    amended, dated May 13, 1998 and related Joint Proxy    Statement/ Prospectus  •     Registration Statement No. 333-70537 on Form S-4, as    amended, dated June 10, 1999 and related Prospectus  •     Registration Statement No. 333-112881 on Form S-8    dated February 17, 2004 and related Prospectus  •     Registration Statement No. 333-30976 on Form S-8 dated    February 23, 2000  •     Registration Statement No. 333-56675 on Form S-8 dated    June 12, 1998  •     Registration Statement No. 333-56615 on Form S-8 dated    June 11, 1998     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP     Certified Public AccountantsWest Palm Beach, FloridaDecember 8, 2005
101
Before the Third Division,

January 24, 1941

No. 45287.

#### Protests 818431-G, etc., of V. A. Herrmann & Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319) certain items of peat moss were held free of duty under paragraph 1685 as claimed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# U.S. Army Reserve engineers experiment with remote-controlled bulldozer

By Sgt. 1st Class Jason Proseus416th Theater Engineer Command

                EDWARDS, Ill.  –              317th Engineer Construction CompanyManeuver Support Center of ExcellenceProgram Executive Offices Combat Support and Combat Service SupportU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Army Reserve website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

416th Theater Engineer Command317th Engineer Construction CompanyRoboticsequipmentdozersU.S. Army Reserveheavy equipment
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Injuries to Construction Laborers

              																																										United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics.								*Injuries to Construction Laborers : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2252*.															Washington, D. C.: 										U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 												March 1986,												https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5244,				accessed on September 8, 2024.										    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended  Quarterly Report of Infinity Capital Group, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Theodore A. Greenberg,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief Investment  Officer and
Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: September 20, 2006


Name: Theodore A. Greenberg

/s/Theodore A. Greenberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Secretary


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
September 9, 1940

No. 44295.

#### Protests 927015-G, etc., of Premier Dental Products Co.

Application by plaintiff for rehearing, granted.