alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 10868]


Missouri Disaster <greek-i> MO-00010 Declaration of Economic 
Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Missouri, dated 5/8/2007.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 1/12/2007 through 1/22/2007.

DATES: Effective Date: 5/08/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 2/8/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties:
    Dallas, Greene, Jasper, Laclede, Lawrence, St. Louis.
Contiguous Counties:
Missouri:
    Barry, Barton, Camden, Christian, Dade, Franklin, Hickory, 
Jefferson, Newton, Polk, Pulaski, St. Charles, St. Louis City, Stone, 
Texas, Webster, Wright.
Illinois:
    Madison, Monroe, Saint Clair.
Kansas:
    Cherokee, Crawford.

    The Interest Rate is: 4.000.
    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 108680.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are: 
Missouri, Illinois, and Kansas.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: May 8, 2007.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-9204 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
## Furnald Law 2150 E. Washington Ave. Madison, WI 53704

tel (608) 347

- 3471 Joshua@furnlaw.com

March 2 . 201 6
U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140 Washington, DC 20590

AMENDMENT TO : Exemption No. 14948 dated February 25, 2016 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 8285

Dear Sir or Madam :

JMedia LLC i s hereby amending Exemption No. 14948 (“Application”) also filed under Regulatory Docket FAA

- 2015

- 8285 to include the UAV :

• DJI Phantom 4

For all of the reasons listed in the Application , this Exemption Request is also in the public interest, within the FAA’s authority , and not a danger to the NAS.
The UAS proposed by the petitioner and approved by the FAA in the initial application were the DJI Inspire 1, DJI Phantom 2, DJI Phantom 3, 3D Robotics Solo, 3D Robotics Iris, Walkera X350 Pro, Walkera Voyager 3, and Syma X8C. The DJI Phantom 4 merely exp ands upon the safety features available in the DJI Phantom 2 and DJI Phantom 3.

M anufactured by DJI, Model

– Phantom 4 A lightweight UAV (3.04 lb. gross weight with all on

- board equipment), battery operated 4

- motor rotorcraft in the form of a quadcopter that takes off and lands vertically.

THE UAV SUMMARY

• An on

- board flight computer with GPS navigation and location ability that receives signals for flight controls from a ground

- based transmitter/controller;

• An on

- board camera capable of capturing ima gery in the form of full color, high definition still photos and video;

• An on

- board telemetry system that delivers flight data from the on

- board flight computer to the on

- board radio transmitter including altitude AGL, horizontal and vertical speed, compass direction of flight and direction back to its launch site;

• Various safety systems including return to launch point in case of communication or mechanical failure.Page 2 of 2

SUMMARY OF THE GROUND STATION BASED PART OF THE SYSTEM

• A Pilot in Command (PIC) in operational control of a flight operation from beginning to end and who controls the UAV while in the air;

• A 100mW, 2.4GHz radio transmitter/controller operated by the PIC to control the UAV while in flight at frequency 2400 GHz to 2483 GHz;

• A radio rece iver receiving live video and flight data from the on

- board camera and computer projects it all together onto a screen for the PIC to view during flight;

• A Visual Observer (VO) is a person who provides a second pair of eyes to visually track the UAV while in flight.

A full list of features, components, and specifications for the DJI Phantom 4 at the following link:
http://www.dji.com/product/phantom

- 4/info

If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Sincerely ,

Joshua Furnald, Esq.

Furnald Law 2150 East Washington Ave. Madison, Wisconsin 53704 608) 347

- 3471
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Keeping our wheels rolling

By Airman 1st Class Benjamin Cooper100th Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs

                RAF MILDENHALL, England   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Royal Air Force Mildenhall website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Royal Air Force Mildenhall100th Logistics Readiness Squadronvehiclevehicle maintenancemaintenancerepair
No. 46430.

#### Protest 37224-K of Burns Lumber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protest was therefore sustained.
No. 54366.

#### B. Shackman & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 114584-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature boxing gloves the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*(37 C. C. P. A. 32, C. A. D. 415), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 56656.

protests 179635-K, etc. (New York).

#### Hecht Levis & Kahn, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 40463.

#### Petition 5756-R of Pall Mall Lace & Embroidery Works, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

Being satisfied from the evidence of the entire good faith of the petitioner and that there was no intention to defraud the revenue the court granted the petition.
Exhibit 23.2

                                    KPMG LLP

        Chartered Accountants
        PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street        Telephone (604) 691-3000
        Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3                    Telefax (604) 691-3031
        Canada                                  www.kpmg.ca

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors
SmarTire Systems Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated September 16, 2005, except for note
19(b) which is as of September 23, 2005, on the consolidated balance sheets of
SmarTire Systems Inc. as of July 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss)
and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended July 31,
2005, included in this form 10-KSB. Our report dated September 16, 2005, except
for note 19(b) which is as of September 23, 2005, contains additional comments
for U.S. readers that states that conditions and events exist that cast
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

KPMG LLP


                                /s/ KPMG LLP

                                Chartered Accountants

                                Vancouver, Canada
                                October 28, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MILLENNIUM CAPITAL VENTURE HOLDINGS,
INC.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jose Araque , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ Jose Araque
    ------------------------------
    Jose Araque, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 12, 2005
No. 48196.

#### Protests 939213-G, etc., of Millinery Clearing House, Inc. (New York).

*437Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items in question consist of manila hemp hats similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) the protests were sustained to this extent.
#### Reynaldo DE LA ROSA, Appellant, v. Raymond COLLERAN and Nicholas Muller, Appellees.

No. 71 Middle District Appeal Docket 1999.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

July 8, 1999.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of July 1999, probable jurisdiction is noted and the order appealed is affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Randall J. COFSKE, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 97-1948.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Aug. 3, 1998.

Mark W. Griffin on brief for appellant.

Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Donald L. Cabell, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, SELYA and BOUDIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful review of the briefs and record, we find no need for oral argument and no reason to disturb defendant’s sentence:

1. For U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3 purposes, an undischarged term of probation is not an *2“undischarged term of imprisonment.” *Prewitt v. United States,*83 F.3d 812, 817-18 (7th Cir.1996); *see also United States v. Gondek,*65 F.3d 1, 2 (1st Cir.1995). Therefore, defendant’s ongoing probation in Virginia did not entitle him to credit for his discharged Virginia prison term. The district court did not commit error, plain or otherwise, in that regard.

2. Contrary to defendant’s argument, the district court sufficiently identified the grounds for the U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) increase: defendant “certainly had reason to believe once he was transferring weapons in the middle of the night surreptitiously that those weapons were going to be used in yet another felony,” and the adjustment was awarded “because in [the court’s] opinion the defendant had reason to believe that the weapons that he sold would be used or possessed in connection with another felony.” Further, there was a sufficient factual basis for that increase, given the inferences reasonably to be drawn from the circumstances of the surreptitious transfer of the guns for illegal drugs and money. And, as defendant was aware of the guidelines and the facts relevant to his sentence, and the pre-sentence report specifically alerted him to the potential for an increase under § 2K2.1(b)(5), no additional notice was required of the district court’s particular intention in that regard. *See United States v. Canada,*960 F.2d 263, 266-67 (1st Cir.1992).

3. No plain error appears as to the two points added to defendant’s criminal history score based on his bail law violations. Even if defendant’s new dispute about the 1992 bail law violation had any merit, there is no dispute that the 1990 violation itself warranted two points. There is no indication that the 1990 bail violation was counted twice. Accordingly, we conclude that the two points properly were added, whatever the status of the 1992 violation.

4. Defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is not cognizable in this direct appeal. If defendant believes that he has a viable claim, he may raise it in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

*Affirmed. See*1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Honoring heroes in blue: National Police Week’s Peace Officer Memorial Service marks the contributions of local law enforcement

By Natalie Skelton, DLA Aviation Public Affairs

                Richmond, Va.  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

community partnershipsDefense Supply Center RichmondDLA AviationDSCRNational Police WeekPeople and CulturePeace Officers Memorial DayDLA Installations ManagementColonial HeightsColonial Heights Sheriff's OfficeSheriff Todd Wilsonpolice
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                RIK DEITSCH                                                    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Rik                Deitsch                                                        |
| Chief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer |

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Form 10-K Annual Report
(the Report) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code.

David H. Clarke, the Chief Executive Officer and
Jeffery B. Park, the Chief Financial Officer of Jacuzzi Brands,
Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | a. the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
    Act; and                                                          
|
| | b. the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc.



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ DAVID H. CLARKE

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | David H. Clarke        
| | Chief Executive Officer



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ JEFFREY B. PARK

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Jeffrey B. Park        
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 9, 2004
Before the Third Division,

May 19, 1944

No. 49421.

#### Protest 64363-K of National Carloading Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In view of the testimony of the importer and an analysis of the merchandise, which established that the duralumin borings in question contained 25 percent of excessive moisture and impurities not usually found in or upon such or similar merchandise, together with the fact that the regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury have been complied with, the court held that duty was properly assessable on 39,264 pounds, rather than on 52,352 pounds. The protest was sustained to this extent.
No. 46442.

#### Protest 56757-K of Burns Lumber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protest was therefore sustained.
---

Exhibit 99.8

Summary of Loan Agreement Entered into by and between
Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (the Company) and Shenzhen
Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China (the Creditor)
dated November 24, 2009

Main contents

- Contract number:
  81101200900002228;
- Loan principal: RMB 75 million;
- Loan term: from November 24,
  2009 to May 21, 2010;
- Floating interest rate: annually
  4.86%, rate adjustment in a 3-month cycle;

| | ■ | Interest accrued and settled per month,
      interest settlement day is the 20th day of each month;
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | ■ | Penalty interest rate for delayed repayment:
      4.86% plus 30% *4.86%;                           
| | ■ | Penalty interest rate for embezzlement of loan
      proceeds: 4.86% plus 50% *4.86%;               

- Purpose of the loan is to provide working capital for purchasing raw
  material of the Company;
- Advanced repayment of loan needs to be approved by the Creditor;
- Breach of contract penalties: correct the breach of contract in time
  limit; suspension of loan unprovided; release loan agreement, demand
  prepayment of loan principal and interest before maturity; imposition of
  punitive interest incurred due to delayed loan; imposition of punitive
  interest for embezzlement of loan; imposition of plural interest for unpaid
  interest; withdraw from any accounts of the Company the loan principal,
  interest and other fees; compensation for the Creditors expenses incurred due
  to demanding the loan principal and interest in case of litigation, etc.
- Supplemental: in the event that the Company repaid the loan in advance, it
  has to pay extra handling fee: advanced repaid amount * share months * 1.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Loan arrangement
- Interest clearing of the loan
- Payment of the loan
- Rights and obligation of the Creditor
- Rights and obligations of the Company
- Interest penalty of loan
- Guarantee of the loan agreement
- Disputation settlement
- Validity
- Text
- Notification

---