alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9675]



[[Page 28477]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of Navy


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete two systems of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy is deleting two systems of records 
in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
June 20, 2007 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA Policy 
Branch, Chief of Naval Operations (DNS-36), 2000 Navy Pentagon, 
Washington, DC 20350-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Doris Lama at (202) 685-6545.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Navy systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the address above.
    The Department of Navy proposes to delete two systems of records 
notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not 
within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of new or 
altered systems reports.

    Dated: May 15, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
N01740-2

System name:
    Federal Housing Administration Mortgage Insurance System (February 
22, 1993, 58 FR 10721).

Reason: Program was disestablished.
N12300-1

System name:
    Employee Assistance Program Case Record System (February 22, 1993, 
58 FR 10819).

Reason:
    Record system is no longer in use since OPM stopped their mandatory 
reporting requirement in the mid-1990s.

 [FR Doc. E7-9675 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1707 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under 

which certain persons may be treated as adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 13, 2011 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Mr. WEBB, Mr. MORAN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. WICKER, 

Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. COBURN, Mr. ENZI, Mr. THUNE, Mr. 

COCHRAN, and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the conditions under which certain persons may be treated as 

adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Second 

5 Amendment Protection Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1707 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PER2 SONS AS ADJUDICATED MENTALLY INCOM3 PETENT FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons 

8 as adjudicated mentally incompetent for 

9 certain purposes 

10 ‘‘In any case arising out of the administration by the 

11 Secretary of laws and benefits under this title, a person 

12 who is mentally incapacitated, deemed mentally incom13 petent, or experiencing an extended loss of consciousness 

14 shall not be considered adjudicated as a mental defective 

15 under subsection (d)(4) or (g)(4) of section 922 of title 

16 18 without the order or finding of a judge, magistrate, 

17 or other judicial authority of competent jurisdiction that 

18 such person is a danger to himself or herself or others.’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended 

21 by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘5511. Conditions for treatment of certain persons as adjudicated mentally incompetent for certain purposes.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### SERVE D JUL Y 16,201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N /i I ' 0 : TMO !

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C
. I N TH E MATTE RO F ROSLYN E MARI E ELDER , Respondent
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SW000 4 DM S NO
. FAA-2010-031 5

HEARIN G NOTIC E PLEAS E TAK

E NOTIC E tha

t the hearing in thi s cas e will b e hel don July29 , 2010 , beginning a

t 10:0 0 a.m. , loca

l time a t th e following location : Ala n Bible Federa

l Building 600 La s Vega s Building , Sout h Room69 0 La s Vega s N

V 8910 1 Allo w time t

o pas s through security
.

Isaa c D.iBenkin Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachment-Servic e Lis tFA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SW000 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action )

SERVIC E iilS T ORIGINM
. & ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGGT43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1OOO '

ON E COP Y EdwardA
. Lopez , Respondent' s Forme r Counse l Ventur e Corporat e Cente r 344 0 Hollywoo dBlvd
. Suit e 41 5 Hollywood , FL3302 1 TEL : 954-241-420 5 FAX : 954-241-420 6 Roslyn e Iliari e Elder , Responden t 83 5 Sierr aVist aDrive , Apt
. 32 6 La s Vegas , N V 8916 9 TEL : 702-412-564 0 Yolandi aAyal aBemal , Complainant' s Counse l Safet y Enforcemen t

Branc h Offic e o f th e Regiona l Coimse l Southwes t

Region , ASW-7E3 , YA B Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBlvd. , Roo m66 3 Fort Worth , T X 76137-000 7 TEL : 817-222-507 0 FAX : 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departaien t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washing^n , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y eiqpe^toi couriffl-

, us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration

, 60 0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wri0\ t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
# C_2012379EN.01003503.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/35

---

Action brought on 15 October 2012 — ZZ v Frontex

(Case F-116/12)

2012/C 379/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s staff report and a claim for damages.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant’s staff report for 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant’s staff report for 2010;

| — | order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 10 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the sum of EUR 10 000 in respect of the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;

| — | order Frontex to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Frontex to pay the costs.

---
No. 54301.

#### The R. T. French Co. *v.*United States,

protest 56346-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *The Otto Gerdau Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 24, C. D. 1120) and *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(id. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry involved.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Sacha H. Spindler, CEO and Chairman of Pluris
Energy Group Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pluris Energy Group
      Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Pluris Energy Group Inc.                                                                 



Dated: April 15, 2008



/s/ Sacha
SpindlerSacha H. Spindler Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pluris Energy
Group Inc. and will be retained by Pluris Energy Group Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 96-6023.

#### Withrow *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 96-5942.

#### Gardner *v.*Kentucky.

Ct. App. Ky. Certio-rari denied.
Honorable Dan Aaron Polster, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, *

sitting by designation.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 10a0140n.06

No. 08-6434

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JESSE RONDALE BAILEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

BEFORE: CLAY and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; POLSTER, District Court Judge.*

Per Curiam. On August 15, 2007, a jury convicted Jesse Bailey on multiple counts of

distributing and conspiring to distribute cocaine. Following his conviction, Bailey moved the district

court for a Judgment of Acquittal as to Count 1 of the superceding indictment, and, in the alternative,

for a New Trial. On July 1, 2007, District Judge Thomas W. Phillips issued an order and

memorandum in part denying both motions. Bailey now appeals.

Having duly considered the arguments and the record, we find Bailey’s appeal to be

meritless. Bailey’s arguments were fairly and adequately addressed in Judge Phillips’ July 1, 2007

memorandum. Indeed, large sections of Bailey’s brief are copied verbatim from his original motion,

such that Judge Phillips was presented with – and was able to address in a thorough and competent

fashion – the same arguments Bailey now makes on appeal. Because the issuance of a full opinion
No. 08-6495

William Davis v. City of Murfreesboro

- 2 -

would serve no jurisprudential purpose and would be duplicative, we AFFIRM on the basis of the

district court’s memorandum the denial of Bailey’s motions for a judgment of acquittal and for a new

trial.
# C_2013026EN.01005002.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/50

---

Action brought on 12 October 2012 — Zoo Sport v OHIM — K-2 (ZOOSPORT)

(Case T-453/12)

2013/C 26/102

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zoo Sport Ltd (Leeds, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Rungg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: K-2 Corp. (Seattle, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Vary the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 August 2012 in case R 1119/2011-4, so as to reject the opposition in its entirety; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Vary the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 August 2012 in case R 1119/2011-4, so as to reject the opposition in its entirety; and

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ZOOSPORT’, for goods and services in classes 18, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 8909251

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 5233119 for the word mark ‘ZOOT’, for goods in classes 9 and 25; Community trade mark registration No 4719316 for the figurative mark in black and white ‘SPORTS ZOOT SPORTS’, for goods and services in classes 25, 35, 36 and 41

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for part of the contested goods and services

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially annulled the contested decision

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Corey Goodman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: August 9, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Corey Goodman
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Corey Goodman          
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, John Doyle, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: August 9, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John Doyle
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                |  | John Doyle             
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014194EN.01002501.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/25

---

Order of the General Court of 14 April 2014 — Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft v Council

(Case T-263/12) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Res judicata - Obligation to state reasons - Obligation of individual communication - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Right to property - Proportionality - Competence of the Council - Misuse of powers - Error of law - Definition of support given to nuclear proliferation - Error of assessment - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

2014/C 194/32

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: F. Esclatine and S. Perrotet, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Cujo and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | In addition to bearing its own costs, Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran shall pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In addition to bearing its own costs, Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran shall pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.

| 3. | The European Commission is ordered to pay its costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission is ordered to pay its costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 258, 25. 8. 2012.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 91 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9094]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 7, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Anne MacEwen, Bank 
Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Citizens Community Bancorp Inc., Ridgewood, New Jersey; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting 
shares of Citizens Community Bank, Ridgewood, New Jersey.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Prairieland Bancorp Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, 
Bushnell, Illinois; to increase its ownership from 43.13 percent to 
48.01 percent of the voting shares of Prairieland Bancorp, Inc., 
Bushnell, Illinois, and thereby indirectly increase its ownership of 
Farmers and Merchants State Bank, Bushnell, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 8, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-9094 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
No. 43178.

#### Protests 567582-G, etc., of P. C. Kuyper & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *Gavin*(23 C. C. P. A. 288, T. D. 48164). The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 909 was therefore sustained.