alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: September 21, 2009



| |                                                                                
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Donald B. Cohen                                                            
| | Donald B. Cohen                                                                
| | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the smaller reporting company specifically incorporates it by reference.
October 20, 1996

No. 96-6390 (A-283).

#### In re Bush.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 11, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41548

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GREGORY KYLE WILSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CR-232-8

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Gregory Kyle Wilson appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea to interstate travel in aid of racketeering. 

Wilson argues that (1) his sentence violates United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), (2) the Feeney Amendment violates

the Separation of Powers Clause, and (3) his base offense level

calculation violated Booker. The Government seeks to enforce the

waiver. By its plain language and the circumstances surrounding

sentencing, Wilson’s knowing and voluntary appeal waiver bars his
No. 04-41548

-2-

challenge to his sentence. See United States v. Burns, 433 F.3d

442, 450-51 (2005); United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 545 (5th

Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# POL fuels ADAB, maintains the mission

By Senior Airman Mya M. Crosby380th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs

                AL DHAFRA AIR BASE, United Arab Emirates   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Air Forces Central Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

380th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness SquadronAl Dhafra Air Basefuelfuel bladderfuel truck
Before the First Division,

May 29, 1951

No. 55588.

#### Bibi & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 141339-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass table articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 55073, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutra Pharma Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rik J. Deitsch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Rik J. Deitsch



_____________________

Rik J. Deitsch

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 26, 2004
No. 42126.

#### Protests 672330-G, etc., of R. Lo Curto (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127791 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 127791 

 COA: 256155 

Muskegon CC: 98-042848-FC 

JEFFREY JOE SHAW,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2004 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
(Reap. Dec. 9671)

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. C-4356, etc.

(Decided April 19, 1960)

*J ames Wilson Young*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of my decision herein, for decision upon stipulation on the basis of which I find foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the plywood exported from Finland involved, and that such value was the appraised unit values, less 4 per centum, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
# C_2015107EN.01000701.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien — Austria) — Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH

(Case C-441/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 5(3) - Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict - Copyright - Dematerialised content - Placing online - Determination of the place of the event giving rise to the damage - Criteria))

(2015/C 107/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Handelsgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pez Hejduk

Defendant: EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that, in the event of an allegation of infringement of copyright and rights related to copyright guaranteed by the Member State of the court seised, that court has jurisdiction, on the basis of the place where the damage occurred, to hear an action for damages in respect of an infringement of those rights resulting from the placing of protected photographs online on a website accessible in its territorial jurisdiction. That court has jurisdiction only to rule on the damage caused in the Member State within which the court is situated.

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunnyside Acres Mobile Estates
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stacy Pierson, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2007



                                        By: /s/ STACEY PIERSON
                                            ___________________________
                                                Stacey Pierson
                                                Secretary and Treasurer
Exhibit
      1




CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT
        AUDITORS
   We
        consent to the use in MDS Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 40-F of our report dated
        January 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
        MDS
        Inc. (“MDS” or the “Company”), included in the 2007 Annual Report to
        Shareholders of the Company.
  We
        also
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on Form
        S-8 (Nos. 333-12056, 333-12058, 333-12548, and 333-13538) of our reports
        dated
        January 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
        the
        Company, MDS management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
        over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
        financial reporting of the Company incorporated by reference in the Annual
        Report on Form 40-F for the year ended October 31, 2007.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-116837 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-126312, 333-126573, 333-127464 and 333-133353 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 1, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statementsand financial statement schedule of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Strategic Hotels &Resorts, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 1, 2007
Before the Second Division,

June 5, 1952

No. 56745.

protests 138913-K and 140632-K (New York).

#### E. J. Keller Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that which was the subject of *The Midwest Waste Material Co.*and *E. J. Keller Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1382), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Ford, J.,

dissented from the conclusion reached by his associates in this case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in O. D. 1382, *supra.*
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Brett D. Mayer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bingham Canyon
Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                        /s/ Brett D. Mayer
Date: 11-7-05           ___________________________________________
                        Brett D. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer
No. 44360.

#### Protests 771942-G/82963, etc., of Davies Turner & Co. et al. (Chicago and New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
No. 48132.

#### Protests 79711-K, etc., of Chong Lung et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel crude drugs the same in all material respects as those involved in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669, as claimed, and drugs, sliced, the same as those involved therein were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34, as claimed.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATE
OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Network 1 Financial Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
W. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer, Vice-President and Chairman (principal
executive officer) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the
Report.





Date:
      October 13, 2010
              /s/ Richard W. HuntRichard
      W. HuntChief
      Executive Officer
No. 47067.

#### Protests 47421-K, etc., of Geo. Borgfeldt Corp. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Certain of the plain woven cotton cloth table covers and napkins in question were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 911 (b) in-view of T. D. 50277, in accordance with stipulation of counsel.
I

- ` !
. v 'I r 7 f : ~ .
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2186

IRINA YUROVA; GENADI YUROV,

Petitioners,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: June 12, 2015 Decided: June 18, 2015

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip R. Kuhn, BRIDGEHOUSELAW, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, 

for Petitioners. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant 

Attorney General, John W. Blakeley, Assistant Director, Kate D. 

Balaban, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Irina Yurova and her husband, Genadi Yurov, natives and 

citizens of Uzbekistan, petition for review of an order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals denying their motion to reconsider. 

We deny the petition for review. 

The Petitioners had 30 days from the May 28, 2014, order to 

timely file a petition for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) 

(2012). This time period is “jurisdictional in nature and must 

be construed with strict fidelity to [its] terms.” Stone v. 

INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). The filing of a motion to reopen 

or reconsider with the Board does not toll or otherwise extend 

the 30-day period for seeking review of the underlying 

order. Id. at 394. A petition for review from the denial of a 

motion to reopen or reconsider, if it is not timely as to the 

underlying removal order, does not bestow jurisdiction to review 

the final order of removal. See Jin Ming Liu v. Gonzales, 439 

F.3d 109, 111 (2d Cir. 2006). Yurova’s October 30, 2014, 

petition for review is only timely as to the September 30, 2014, 

order denying reconsideration. 

The denial of a motion to reconsider is reviewed for abuse 

of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2015); Narine v. Holder, 

559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009). A motion to reconsider 

asserts the Board made an error in its earlier decision and 

“shall state the reasons for the motion by specifying the errors 

2
of fact or law in the prior Board decision and shall be 

supported by pertinent authority.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1) 

(2015). We will reverse a denial of a motion to reconsider 

“only if the Board acted arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary 

to law.” Narine, 559 F.3d at 249 (internal quotation marks 

omitted). 

We conclude the Board did not abuse its discretion in 

denying the motion to reconsider. Accordingly, we deny the 

petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

3
No. 74-5839.

#### Lundy *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.