alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the transition  report of Petrogen Corp.  (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sacha H. Spindler,
Chief  Executive  Officer and acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certifies for the purpose of complying  with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the  "Exchange  Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Exchange  Act;  and 2.  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.




Dated: April 14, 2004                    By:  /s/ SACHA SPINDLER
                                                  ______________________________
                                                  Sacha H. Spindler
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE D ISTRIC T OF CO LU M BIA

WALEED S AID BN SAID ZA ID, P etitioner ,

v . Ci vilAc ti on N o. 05 -1 64 6 ( JD B)

BARACK

H. OBAMA, et al., Re spo nde nt s.

OR DE R Pur su ant t o th e status c on fe re nc e he ld o n M ay 7, 20 09 , a

nd the e nti re re c or d h e re in, it i s h e r e b y OR

DE RE D a s f

oll ow s: 1. Counsel for re spondents shall confe r with repr esentatives of the De partment of Def ense to de termine the status of the production of medic al re cords r equeste d by petitioner and sh a ll f ile a status re po rt

by no t late r t

ha n M ay 15 , 2 00 9 th at sp e c if

ie s p re c ise ly

wh e n th os e medical r ecor ds will be produce d to petitioner. 2. The Court notes that counse l for re spondents repr esente d at the status conf ere nce that responde nts do not int end to furthe r ame nd the fa ctual re turn in this case. 3. The brie fingschedule for motions for judg ment on the re cord pur suant to § I I I .A.1 of the Case Manag ement Or der in this case is modified as follows: responde nts' motion for jud g me nt o n th e re c or d s ha ll b e fi le d b y no t late r t

ha n M ay 29 , 2 00 9; p e tit ion e r' s o pp os iti on sh a llCounsel for petitioner r epre sented that pe titioner does not intend to file a c ross-motion 1 for judgment on the re cord. -2- be filed by

not later than June 15, 2009; and re spondents' reply shall be filed by

not later than 1 J une 22, 2009. 4. An evidentiar

y hearing sha ll be held in this case, if ne cessa ry , on August 25, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 15. SO OR DE RE D
. / s / J OHN D. B ATES Un i t edS t at es Di s tri ctJ u d ge Date: Ma

y 7, 2009
- 1

-

No. 65 SSM 7

The People &c.,

Respondent,

v.

Kysean Stroud,

Appellant.

Submitted by Terrence M. Connors, for appellant.

Submitted by Matthew B. Powers, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM :

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

A de termination of reasonable suspicion is a mixed question of law and fact which

is beyond our further review if there is legally sufficient record support for the- 2

- SSM No. 7

- 2

- determinations of the courts below ( see People v Parker , 32 NY3d 49, 55 [2018]). The

record con tains support for the lower courts’ finding of reasonable suspicion to stop the car

in which defendant was a passenger ( see People v Chestnut , 43 AD2d 260 [3d Dept 1974],

affd 36 NY2d 971 [1975]). Defendant’s remaining contention lacks merit.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a

memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Garcia, Singas, and Cannataro conc ur.

Judge Troutman took no part.

Decided June 14, 2022
No. 65780.

#### Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/20846 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of constituent and integral parts of toilet-box assemblies the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C.D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2012379EN.01003101.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/31

---

Action brought on 22 October 2012 — Popp and Zech v OHIM — Müller-Boré & Partner (MB)

(Case T-463/12)

2012/C 379/52

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Eugen Popp (Munich, Germany) and Stefan M. Zech (Munich) (represented by: C. Rohnke and M. Jacob, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Müller-Boré & Partner (Munich, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 July 2012 in Case R 506/2011-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 July 2012 in Case R 506/2011-1;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘MB’ for services in Class 42 — Community trade mark application No 7 369 771

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Müller-Boré & Partner

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark MBP and the national and Community trade mark, including the word element ‘MB&P’, for services in Classes 35 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was upheld and the application was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 42(2) and Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 42(2) and Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of USIP.Com,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Kathy  Christopher,
Controller  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


s/s Kathy Christopher
Kathy Christopher
Controller, USIP.Com, Inc.

May  9, 2005


USIP.Com,  Inc. does not have a "Chief Financial  Officer," Kathy Christopher is
the principal financial and accounting officer.
2002 Cows and Baseline VOC Emissions (t/d)

Milking Cows (MC)

Dry Cows 

(DC) Heifers (H) Calves (C) Total Cows

VOC Emiss. 

Factor (EF, 

lb/head/yr)

VOC Baseline Emissions 

(t/d)

 204,846 36,201 75,582 77,320 393,949 12.8 6.91

Projected Headcount (with 2% decrease/yr) 

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

 386,070 378,191 370,312 362,433 354,554 346,675 338,796 330,917

Projected Cows By Category (with 2% decrease/yr) 

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Milking Cows 200,749 196,652 192,555 188,458 184,361 180,264 176,168 172,071

Dry Cows 35,477 34,753 34,029 33,305 32,581 31,857 31,133 30,409

Heifers 74,070 72,559 71,047 69,535 68,024 66,512 65,001 63,489

Calves 75,774 74,227 72,681 71,134 69,588 68,042 66,495 64,949

Projected Future-Year VOC Emissions (t/d)

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

 6.77 6.63 6.49 6.35 6.22 6.08 5.94 5.80
 2002 manure (tons) - 

Based on milking cows 

only 1,075,835 (Assumption: each milking cow produces 5.25192 tons manure/yr) 

Projected Manure (tons) - Milking Cows only

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

 1,054,318 1,032,801 1,011,285 989,768 968,251 946,735 925,218 903,701

VOC Emiss. Factor 0.002343551 t VOC/t manure

Manure Disposal (t/yr) using milking cows only and same percentage in Staff Report -2% decrease per year - Our data

2002 2006 2010

Local Land Application 687,028 755,193 670,185

Out of Region 206,238 206,367 205,502

Windrow Composting 182,569

Rule 1133.2 Composting 6,038 6,055

Digester (Feed Lane Cleaning 22,072 21,960

Total Manure Removal (t/y)1,075,835 989,669 903,701
VOC Emiss. (t/d) - Current Practices (Without R 1127)- Using same percentages and EF in Staff Report - Our data

2002 2006 2010

Local land application 0.51 0.56 0.49

Out of region 0.66 0.66 0.66

Windrow composting 0.44

Rule 1133.2 Composting 0.02 0.02

Digester 0.14 0.14

VOC Reduction (t/d) 1.61 1.38 1.31

Remaining VOC (t/d) 5.30 4.97 4.49

Baseline VOC (t/d) 6.91 6.35 5.80

% Reduction 23.3 21.7 22.6

Manure Disposal With Rule 1127 - Using same percentages of Staff Report - Our data

2006 2010

Local land application 574,461 488,451

Out of region 205,674 205,682

Windrow composting

Alternative Compostingh (Fabric in-vessel) 181,523 181,554

Rule 1133.2 Composting 6,028 6,055

Digester 21,973 22,050

Total 989,659 903,792
VOC Reduction (t/d) - With Rule 1127 - Using same percentage of Staff Report - Our data

2006 2010

Local land application 0.64 0.54

Out of region 0.99 0.99

Windrow composting

Alternative Composting 0.77 0.77

Rule 1133.2 Composting 0.03 0.03

Digester 0.14 0.14

VOC reduction (t/d) 

with Rule 1127 2.57 2.47

VOC Remaining (t/d) 

with Rule 1127 3.79 3.33

VOC reduction (t/d) 

from Rule 1127 Alone 1.19 1.16

% Reduction from R 

1127 Alone 31.3 34.8
#### Floyd J. RIVERE, et ux. v. NPC SERVICES, INC., et al.

No. 98-CC-3167.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 23, 1998.

In re NPC Services Inc. et al; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 336-561; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW98 2534.

Denied.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
(LOGO) Washington Mutual

As of and for the 12 months ended  December 31, 1998,  Washington  Mutual,  Inc.
(the "Company") has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amounts of $60 million and $25 million, respectively.

Steven Freimuth
Executive Vice President
Lending Administration

David Imig
Senior Vice President
Loan Servicing

February 26, 1999


s
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSHDY SHEHATA MINA SHEHATA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74797

Agency No. A096-026-666

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 1, 2011** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Roshdy Shehata Mina Shehata, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

AUG 2 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-74797

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual

findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we

deny the petition for review.

Shehata does not challenge the IJ’s dispositive finding that his application

for asylum was untimely. Accordingly, Shehata’s asylum claim fails.

Even if Shehata was credible, the record does not compel the conclusion that

the incident where Muslim men beat him and the incident where the police

detained and beat him, even considered cumulatively, amounted to past

persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1019 (9th Cir. 2006). In

addition, even if he was a member of a disfavored group, Shehata has not shown

sufficient individualized risk to establish a clear probability of persecution. See

Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1185 (9th Cir. 2003); Wakkary v. Holder, 558

F.3d 1049, 1066-67 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[a]n applicant for withholding of removal

will need to adduce a considerably larger quantum of individualized-risk

evidence”). Further, the record does not compel the conclusion that there is a

pattern or practice of persecution of Coptic Christians. See id. at 1060-62. 

Accordingly, Shehata’s withholding of removal claim also fails.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief

because Shehata failed to establish that it is more likely than not he will be tortured
3 08-74797

by or with the acquiescence of the Egyptian government. See Silaya v. Mukasey,

524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Vandenberg solar array project

By Airman 1st Class Clayton Wear30th Space Wing Public Affairs

                VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, Calif.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Vandenberg Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Vandenberg Air Force Baseelectricitysolarsolar powersolar arraysolar energyphotovoltaic
October 20, 2014

AEMP Data: Atrazine, Flow, Precipitation and TSS Plots 

for 2014 Monitoring Year
2

2014 IA-04
3

2014 IA-05
4

2014 LA-04 
5

2014 MO-01
6

2014 MO-02
7

2014 MO-07N
8

2014 MO-08
9

2014 NE-04
10

2014 TX-01
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Distribution’s Dawa presented commander’s coin

By Brianne M. BenderDLA Distribution Command Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
DLA Distribution’s Diana Dawa, public affairs specialist, received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition walkabout event Feb. 26.

Dawa has been assisting with the creation of DLA Distribution’s command videos.  While the task is not in her job description, she jumped in to order the necessary equipment — including camera, lights, filters and teleprompter. 

“Diana drew on her nine years of field experience as a broadcast journalist for U.S. Army Europe and has been setting up a professional video recording set within Rear Adm. Jones’ office,” said Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution public affairs officer. “She also works with him to make him comfortable in front of the camera and talks him through specifics of video messaging.”

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionDistributionawardCOIN
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications  The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp. and will be retained by Eastern Environment Solutions, Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  November 16, 2009 /s/ Feng Yan Feng Yan (Chief Executive Officer)  November 16, 2009 /s/ Jianhua Sun Jianhua Sun (Chief Financial Officer)
132 STAT. 2450 PUBLIC LAW 115–238—SEPT. 7, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 899 (H.R. 2648): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–825, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform) accompanying H.R. 2648. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Mar. 20, considered and passed Senate. 

July 16, considered and passed House, amended. 

Aug. 22, Senate concurred in House amendments. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–238 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to ensure that the requirements that new 

Federal employees who are veterans with service-connected disabilities are provided leave for purposes of undergoing medical treatment for such disabilities 

apply to certain employees of the Veterans Health Administration. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Providing Healthcare 

Transition Improvement Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DISABLED VETERAN LEAVE FOR HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS IN VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6329(d)(1) of title 5, United States 

Code, is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(1) the term ‘employee’ has the meaning given such term 

in section 2105, and includes— 

‘‘(A) an officer or employee of the United States Postal 

Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission; and 

‘‘(B) notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 7421 of 

title 38, an individual occupying a position listed in subsection (b) of such section;’’. 

(b) APPLICABILITY.—With respect to a position listed in section 

7421(b) of title 38, United States Code, the amendment made by 

subsection (a) shall apply to any individual appointed to such a 

position on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Approved September 7, 2018. 

5 USC 6329 note. 

Definition. 

5 USC 101 note. 

Veterans 

Providing 

Healthcare 

Transition 

Improvement 

Act. 

Sept. 7, 2018 

[S. 899] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF