alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013336EN.01002303.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/23

---

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Hübner v OHIM — Silesia Gerhard Hanke (Original silecia Kieselsäure-Gel)

(Case T-211/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 336/49

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Anton Hübner GmBH & Co KG (Ehrenkirchen, Germany) (represented: initially by A. Kirchgäßner and subsequently by R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Silesia Gerhard Hanke GmBH & Co KG (Norf, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Krieger, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 March 2012 (Case R 351/2011-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Silesia Gerhard Hanke GmBH & Co KG and Anton Hübner GmBH & Co KG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, to bear half of the defendant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, to bear half of the defendant’s costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 10.22
 [ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has
been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
AMENDED SUPPLY AGREEMENT
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED SUPPLY AGREEMENT st
 WHEREAS th
 NOW THEREFOR
 EXHIBIT A : Products and Pricing:
   **
 Attachment No. 1 to this Agreement represents the changes herein
and provides current products and pricing
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 ENDWAVE CORPORATION
    
    
    
    NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSIONSYSTEMS CORP.By:
    
    /s/ [*]
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ [*][*]
    
    
    
    
    
    [*]130 Baytech Dr
    
    
    
    One Space Park DriveSan Jose, CA 95134
    
    
    
    Redondo Beach, CA 90278(408) 522-3177
    
    
    
    (310) 813-9328




---



##### 



Attachment No. 1 to Amended Supply Agreement
EXHIBIT A
PRODUCTS AND PRICING
 [*]
  ENDWAVE CORPORATION
    
    
    
    NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSIONSYSTEMS CORP./s/ [*]
    
    12/22/08
    
    
    
    /s/ [*]
    
    12/19/08Date
    
    
    
    
    
    Date
 [ * ] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has
been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 96-531.

No. 96-547.

#### Lungren, Attorney General of California *v.*Doe; and Doe *v.*Lungren, Attorney General of California.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of the parties to expedite consideration of petitions for writs of certiorari denied.
----

----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | the                accompanying Form 10-KSB report for the period ending July 31, 2007                as                filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

*Date:      November      8, 2007                                                                                                                /s/      Jeff Finkelstein*

*                                                                          *
*      Jeff      Finkelstein, Chief Financial Officer*
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EHBIBIT 24.2


                         VLASIC FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC.




                                  CERTIFICATION





      I, the undersigned Secretary of Vlasic Foods International Inc., a New
Jersey corporation, certify that the attached document entitled

                             FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of Vlasic Foods
International Inc. on October 6, 1998, and that the same is still in full force
and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
Vlasic Foods International Inc. this 12th day of October, 1998.



                                                    Norma B. Carter
                                                    Corporate Secretary


<PAGE>   2


                         VLASIC FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC.

                          BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION

                                 October 6, 1998

                                      * * *

                             FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

      RESOLVED, that the Form 10-K Annual Report for fiscal 1998 of Vlasic Foods
International Inc. in the form presented to this meeting, is hereby approved.

      FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary and the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and the Vice
President - Controller of Vlasic Foods International Inc. are authorized to
execute the Form 10-K Annual Report for fiscal 1998 approved by this resolution
and to cause such Form 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with such
modifications as may be required by the Commission or as may be desirable in the
opinion of such officers.

      FURTHER RESOLVED, that each of the directors and the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Vlasic Foods International Inc. are each hereby authorized
to execute in their respective capacities, a power of attorney in favor of Norma
B. Carter designating her as the true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent of
the signatory with full power and authority to execute and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Form 10-K Annual Report for
fiscal 1998 with all exhibits and other documents in connection therewith as
such attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or desirable; and to do and perform
each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the
premises as fully to all intents and purposes as such officers and directors
could do themselves.
# C_2012089EN.01002801.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/28

---

Action brought on 19 January 2012 — IDT Biologika v Commission

(Case T-30/12)

2012/C 89/46

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: IDT Biologika GmbH (Dessau-Roßlau, Germany) (represented by: R. Gross and T. Kroupa, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 5 October 2011 rejecting the tender submitted in respect of Lot No 1 by IDT Biologika GmbH in response to the call for tenders, reference EuropeAid/130686/C/SUP/RS Re-launch LOT 1, for the supply of a rabies vaccine to the beneficiary Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Supply of the Republic of Serbia, and awarding the contract in question to a consortium of various companies led by ‘Biovet a. s.’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 5 October 2011 rejecting the tender submitted in respect of Lot No 1 by IDT Biologika GmbH in response to the call for tenders, reference EuropeAid/130686/C/SUP/RS Re-launch LOT 1, for the supply of a rabies vaccine to the beneficiary Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Supply of the Republic of Serbia, and awarding the contract in question to a consortium of various companies led by ‘Biovet a. s.’;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action the applicant alleges infringement of Article 252(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2342/2002 (1) as the applicant takes the view that the successful tender does not fulfil the technical requirements specified in the tender documents with regard to the requisite non-virulence to humans of the vaccine offered and with regard to the requisite authorisations and should not therefore have been taken into account.

1

Furthermore, the taking into account of the successful tender of the consortium led by ‘Biovet a. s.’ constitutes discrimination as regards price comparison since the applicant’s tender alone satisfies all the actual requirements made with regard to the technical specifications in respect of the award procedure at issue and is therefore the only tender in the procedure which is in order.

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 357, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 32.1   SKINOVATION PHARMACEUTICAL INCORPORATED  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated.   Date: August 3, 2009/s/ Hugo Rodier
Hugo Rodier
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officers of the PBSJ Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                              |  | 
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|Dated: August 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Robert J. Paulsen                                        |  | 
|                       |  | Robert J. Paulsen                                            |  | 
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer                                      |  | 
|                       |  |                                                             
|Dated: August 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Donald J. Vrana                                          |  | 
|                       |  | Donald J. Vrana                                              |  | 
|                       |  | Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer |  |
/A I 

MINISTERE DE L'ECOLOGIE, DU DEVELOPPEMENT DURABLE 

ET DE L'ENERGIE 

Direction generale de I'Aviation civile Paris, le 11 MAR 20, J 

~ 

Direction du Transport aerien 

Sous-direction des Transporteurs et Services aeriens 

R&6rence : j- ~ ~ ~ /DTA/SDT 

Affaire suivie par : Dominique Grass 

dominique.grass@aviation-civile.gouv.fr 

TOI. 0158 09 43 34 - Fax : 0158 09 38 65 

Mr Paul GRETCH 

Director of Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street S.W. 

WASHINGTON DC 20590 

USA 

Subject : Reciprocity certificate 

Dear Mr Gretch, 

In the framework of the Charter Rules for U.S. and Foreign Direct Air Carriers and in accordance 

with the rights included in the Air Transport Agreement signed in Washington on 30 April 2007 

between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America and the 

rights included in the Air Transport Agreement signed on 18 June 1998 between the Government 

of the French Republic and the Government of the United States as amended, the French civil 

aviation authorities herewith confirm that they will grant, on the basis of reciprocity, fifth-freedom 

rights to U.S. air carriers to provide non scheduled flights to/from the French territory. 

Non scheduled traffic rights outside of this scope shall continue to be considered on a case by case 

basis and out of reciprocity. 

This letter will remain valid until it is recalled. 

Yours sincerely, 

'chel Lamalle 

Deputy Director for Airlines and Air Services 

50, rue Henry Farman 

75720 Paris cedex 15 ~ ~ • 

www.developpement-durable.gouv.lr T6I :+33 (0) 158 09 43 21
# C_2012355EN.01003401.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/34

---

Action brought on 6 September 2012 — Vitaminaqua Ltd v OHIM

(Case T -410/12)

2012/C 355/71

Language in which the application was lodged: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vitaminaqua Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Krajnyák, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Energy Brands, Inc. (New York, United States of America)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Amend the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM rejecting application No 8338592 for registration of the figurative mark ‘vitaminaqua’ (Case R 997/2011-1) and order the registration of the trade mark in accordance with the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM, thereby conferring protection as a trade mark on the sign; |
| --- | --- |

—

Amend the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM rejecting application No 8338592 for registration of the figurative mark ‘vitaminaqua’ (Case R 997/2011-1) and order the registration of the trade mark in accordance with the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM, thereby conferring protection as a trade mark on the sign;

| — | Order the defendant or the other party to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant or the other party to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Vitaminaqua Ltd.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘vitaminaqua’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 32 (application for registration No 8 338 592).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Energy Brands, Inc.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: inter alia the national word mark ‘VITAMINWATER’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 32.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: decision of the Opposition Division set aside and application for registration as a Community trade mark rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
No. 42061.

#### Protest 802195-G of American Import Co. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the microscopes in question, are the same as those the subject of *United Stales*v. *Wolf*(26 C. C. P. A. 243, C. A. D. 23). The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 228 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                        ---------------------------------




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Urban Improvement Fund
- 1974 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paul H. Pfleger, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of
the Partnership, and John M. Orehek as the equivalent of the Chief Financial
Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.






Date: 12-31-05                              /s/ Paul H. Pfleger
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Paul H. Pfleger




Date: 12-31-05                              /s/ John M. Orehek
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  John M. Orehek


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2014045EN.01003102.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/31

---

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2013 — Pips v OHIM — s.Oliver Bernd Freier (ISABELLA OLIVER)

(Case T-38/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2014/C 45/51

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pips BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: J. van den Berg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: s.Oliver Bernd Freier GmbH & Co. KG (Rottendorf, Germany) (represented by: S. Körber and D. Kämper, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 October 2011 (Case R 2420/2010-1), concerning opposition proceedings between s.Oliver Bernd Freier GmbH & Co. KG and Pips BV.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The intervener shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The intervener shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2435

WILLIAM F. WRIGHT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-1774)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William F. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Richard

Farber, Sally J. Schornstheimer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the tax court's order dismissing his

petition and imposing a penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673 (1988) based

on the frivolous nature of the allegations raised in his petition.

We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

tax court. Wright v. Commissioner, Tax Ct. No. 95-1774 (U.S. Tax

Ct. May 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 96-6008.

#### Kapadia *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.