Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 22, 2007 / Notices 28675 

2 15 CFR 744 Supplement No. 4. 

to entities in China on BIS’s Entity List 

without the required export licenses.2

I find that the evidence presented by 

BIS demonstrates that the Respondent 

has violated the EAR, that such 

violations have been significant, 

deliberate and covert, and that there is 

a likelihood of future violations. 

Accordingly, I find that issuing a TDO 

against Bill Chen for 180 days is 

necessary in the public interest to 

prevent an imminent violation of the 

EAR. 

III. Order 

It is Therefore Ordered: 

First, that the Respondent, BILL 

CHEN, AKA Yueqiang Chen, of Data 

Physics China, RM. 1509, Building 2, 

Xinquduan Jiayan, No. 5 

Changchunquia Road, Haidian District, 

Beijing, P.R. China, 100089 and of 615 

Blossom Hill Road, #17, Los Gatos, 

California 95032 (the ‘‘Denied Person’’), 

may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Export Administration Regulations 

(‘‘EAR’’), or in any other activity subject 

to the EAR, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the EAR, or in any other 

activity subject to the EAR; or 

C. Benefiting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the EAR, or in any 

other activity subject to the EAR. 

Second, that no person may, directly 

or indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the EAR; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control to the EAR that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States, including financing or 

other support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been exported from the United States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the Untied states any item subject to the 

EAR with knowledge or reason to know 

that the item will be, or is intended to 

be, exported from the United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, or whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been or will 

be exported from the United States. For 

purposes of this paragraph, servicing 

means installation, maintenance, repair, 

modification or testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to any of the 

Denied Person by affiliation, ownership, 

control, or position of responsibility in 

the conduct of trade or related services 

may also be made subject to the 

provisions of this Order. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the EAR where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the EAR are the foreign-produced direct 

product of U.S.-origin technology. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, the 

Respondent may, at any time, appeal 

this Order by filing a full written 

statement in support of the appeal with 

the Office of the Administrative Law 

Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing 

Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21202–4022. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may 

seek renewal of this Order by filing a 

written request not later than 20 days 

before the expiration date. The 

Respondent may oppose a request to 

renew this Order by filing a written 

submission with the Assistant Secretary 

of Commerce for Export Enforcement, 

which must be received not later than 

seven days before the expiration date of 

the Order. 

A copy of this order shall be served 

on the Respondent and shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect for 180 days. 

Entered this 16th day of May, 2007. 

Darryl W. Jackson, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 07–2525 Filed 5–21–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–840] 

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 

Rod From Canada: Extension of Time 

Limit for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 22, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shane Subler, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 1, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0189. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 27, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published its notice of 

initiation of an antidumping duty 

administrative review on carbon and 

certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada. 

See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 71 FR 68535 (November 27, 2006). 

The preliminary results of this 

administrative review are currently due 

on July 3, 2007. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

the Department shall issue preliminary 

results in an administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order for which a review is requested 

and the final results within 120 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. However, if it is 

not practicable to complete the review 

within the specified time periods, 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows 

the Department to extend these 

deadlines to a maximum of 365 days 

and 180 days, respectively. 

Completion of the preliminary results 

within the originally anticipated time 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
28676 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 22, 2007 / Notices 

limit, July 3, 2007, is impracticable 

because the Department must analyze 

complex issues regarding Ivaco Rolling 

Mills 2004 L.P.’s and Sivaco Ontario’s 

corporate structures, their affiliations 

and corporate relationships, levels of 

trade, and cost of production. Because it 

is not practicable to complete the review 

within the time specified under the Act, 

in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act, the Department is extending 

the time limit for completion of the 

preliminary results by 120 days to 

October 31, 2007. The deadline for the 

final results of this administrative 

review continues to be 120 days after 

the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: May 16, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9820 Filed 5–21–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–421–807] 

Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from the Netherlands; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 11, 2006, we 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review. See Certain Hot–

Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from 

the Netherlands; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 71 FR 71523 (December 11, 

2006) (Preliminary Results). This review 

covers imports of subject merchandise 

from Corus Staal BV (Corus Staal) to the 

United States during the period 

November 1, 2004, to October 31, 2005. 

Based on our analysis of the comments 

received, we have made changes to the 

margin calculation. However, the final 

results do not differ from the 

preliminary results. The final weighted–

average dumping margin for the 

reviewed firm is listed below in the 

section entitled ‘‘Final Results of 

Review.’’

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 22, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–0409 or (202) 482–

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 11, 2006, we published 

in the Federal Register the preliminary 

results of this administrative review. 

See Preliminary Results. In response to 

the Department’s invitation to comment 

on the preliminary results of this 

review, Corus (respondent) and 

domestic interested party Mittal Steel 

USA Inc. (Mittal Steel) filed case briefs 

on January 17, 2007. Corus, Mittal Steel 

and petitioner United States Steel 

Corporation (U.S. Steel) submitted 

rebuttal briefs on January 24, 2007, and 

on January 25, 2007, domestic interested 

party Nucor Corporation (Nucor) filed a 

rebuttal brief. On March 23, 2007, the 

Department extended the final results 

by 35 days. See Certain Hot–Rolled 

Carbon Steel Flat Products from the 

Netherlands; Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; Extension of 

Time Limit, 72 FR 13744 (March 23, 

2007). 

On May 4, 2007, Corus submitted a 

request for the Department to rescind 

the review in light of the Department ’s 

Final Results for the Section 129 

Determination: Certain Hot–rolled 

Carbon Steel from the Netherlands 

(April 9, 2007) and the U.S. Trade 

Representative’s instructions to the 

Department to implement those findings 

under Section 129 of the Uruguay 

Round Agreements Act. See 

Implementation of the Findings of the 

WTO Panel in US–Zeroing (EC): Notice 

of Determinations under Section 129 of 

the Uruguay Agreements Act and 

Revocations and Partial Revocations of 

Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 

FR 25, 261 (May 4, 2007). On May 11, 

2007, Mittal Steel and Nucor submitted 

responses to Corus Staal’s request. The 

request for rescission is well past the 

deadline for such requests and 

furthermore Corus Staal itself did not 

request the review, thus making it 

ineligible to request rescission. See 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1). Corus’ arguments 

regarding the section 129 determination 

are addressed in the Issues and 

Decisions Memorandum, (Decision 

Memorandum) which accompanies this 

Notice, at issue 4. 

Period of Review 

The period of review (POR) is 

November 1, 2004, to October 31, 2005. 

Scope of the Order 

For purposes of this order, the 

products covered are certain hot–rolled 

carbon steel flat products of a 

rectangular shape, of a width of 0.5 inch 

or greater, neither clad, plated, nor 

coated with metal and whether or not 

painted, varnished, or coated with 

plastics or other non–metallic 

substances, in coils (whether or not in 

successively superimposed layers), 

regardless of thickness, and in straight 

lengths, of a thickness of less than 4.75 

mm and of a width measuring at least 

10 times the thickness. Universal mill 

plate (i.e., flat–rolled products rolled on 

four faces or in a closed box pass, of a 

width exceeding 150 mm, but not 

exceeding 1250 mm, and of a thickness 

of not less than 4.0 mm, not in coils and 

without patterns in relief) of a thickness 

not less than 4.0 mm is not included 

within the scope of the order. 

Specifically included within the scope 

of this order are vacuum degassed, fully 

stabilized (commonly referred to as 

interstitial–free (IF)) steels, high 

strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, and 

the substrate for motor lamination 

steels. IF steels are recognized as low 

carbon steels with micro–alloying levels 

of elements such as titanium or niobium 

(also commonly referred to as 

columbium), or both, added to stabilize 

carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA 

steels are recognized as steels with 

micro–alloying levels of elements such 

as chromium, copper, niobium, 

vanadium, and molybdenum. The 

substrate for motor lamination steels 

contains micro–alloying levels of 

elements such silicon and aluminum. 

Steel products to be included in the 

scope of this order, regardless of 

definitions in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTS), are 

products in which: (i) iron 

predominates, by weight, over each of 

the other contained elements; (ii) the 

carbon content is 2 percent or less, by 

weight; and (iii) none of the elements 

listed below exceeds the quantity, by 

weight, respectively indicated: 

1.80 percent of manganese, or 

2.25 percent of silicon, or 

1.00 percent of copper, or 

0.50 percent of aluminum, or 

1.25 percent of chromium, or 

0.30 percent of cobalt, or 

0.40 percent of lead, or 

1.25 percent of nickel, or 

0.30 percent of tungsten, or 

0.10 percent of molybdenum, or 

0.10 percent of niobium, or 

0.15 percent of vanadium, or 

0.15 percent of zirconium. 

All products that meet the physical 

and chemical description provided 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES