alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wage Structure: Motor Vehicles and Parts, 1950: Hourly Earnings and Supplementary Wage Practices

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wage Structure: Motor Vehicles and Parts, 1950: Hourly Earnings and Supplementary Wage Practices : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1015*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1951,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4443,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 47707.

#### Protests 73782-K, etc., of Herman Cohen & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in 'Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                            388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                             New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001



AAA Capital Management Inc.
5051 Westheimer - Suite 2100
Houston, Texas 77056

Attention:  Mr. Anthony Annunziato

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Annunziato:

We are  writing  with  respect  to your  management  agreements  concerning  the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

o        Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P.
o        Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P.

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:      /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         -----------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director


AGREED AND ACCEPTED
AAA CAPITAL MANAGMENT INC.
By:

Print Name:


DRMcA/sr
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 18 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Is uzu on June 23, 2011 FROM: Don Kopinski TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on June 23 , 2011 b etween Is uzu and EPA staff. The following people attended : Isuzu : Jeff Marsee, Takahiro Koseki, Steve Yarrow EPA: By ron Bunker, Chris Nevers, Chuck Moulis, Tony Fernandez , and Don Kopinski
The discussion focused on Nissan’s plans for HD incomplete vehicles and how the EPA/NHTSA HD GHG and fuel consumption program will affect them. Is uzu representatives explained th at, for some of their heavy- duty incomplete vehicles, they face unusual circumstances in that these vehicles are sold in a variety of configurations, but I suzu does not sell a corresponding complete vehicle that could serve as a sister vehicle under the HD GHG rule sister vehicle concept. Discussion focused on creating an equivalent regulatory framework to that envisioned under the original sister vehicle concept, whereby a manufacturer could choose one of the incomplete vehicle configurations it produces , and use it to create a complete vehicle solely for the purpose of testing (or use a customer’s completed vehicle for this purpose).
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: September 22, 2008



| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Donald B. Cohen                       
| | Donald B. Cohen                           
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
No. 96-7052.

#### Hiltunen *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certio-rari denied.
#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., a/c Gunthel *&*Gruveilher et al. *v.*United States

No. 6853.

Entry No. 6802, etc.

Invoices dated Tunstall, England, February 22, 1941, etc.

Entered at San Francisco, Calif., June 11, 1941, etc.

(Decided February 11, 1947)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (Frank L. Lawrence*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### United States *v.*H. Elkan & Co., Inc.

No. 7851.

Entry Nos. 883-H and 990-H.

(Decided June 27, 1950)

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(William J. Vitale,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

These are appeals for reappraisement of merchandise known as urunday extract imported from Argentina on or about April 26, 1949.

When the case was called for trial, it was submitted on the following stipulation:

> *359It is hereby stipulated and agreed by counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that at the time of exportation of the Urunday Extract involved herein, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at $210 per metric ton, gross weight, packed.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is $210 per metric ton, gross weight, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# AF awards first energy savings performance contract of 2018 at Hill AFB

By J. Brian GarmonAFIMSC Public Affairs

                TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla.  –              Defense Logistics Agencyenergy savings performance contract*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Air Force Civil Engineer Center website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Hill Air Force BaseOgden Air Logistics ComplexESPCenergyDLA EnergyDLAEnergy Savings Performance Contract
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Painting partnerships to strengthen Air Force

By Senior Airman Tryphena Mayhugh62nd Airlift Wing Public Affairs

                JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD, Wash  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

60th Maintenance SquadronTravis Air Force BaseAir Mobility Command62nd Airlift WingJoint Base Lewis-McChordpaintmaintenance
No. 54984.

#### Accro Bond Watch Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 112617-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the items marked *“A”*were held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20 each as watch movements more than *%o*of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
# C_2015389EN.01002701.xml

| 23.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2015 — Anagnostakis v Commission

(Case T-450/12) (1)

1

((Law governing the institutions - European citizens’ initiative - Economic and monetary policy - Non-reimbursement of sovereign debt - Affirmation of the principle of the ‘State of necessity’ - Refusal of registration - Powers of the Commission - Obligation to state reasons))

(2015/C 389/27)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alexios Anagnostakis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: A. Anagnostakis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission decision C(2012) 6289 final of 6 September 2012 rejecting the request to register the European citizens’ initiative ‘One Million Signatures for a Europe of Solidarity’, submitted to the Commission on 13 July 2012.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Mr Alexios Anagnostakis to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Alexios Anagnostakis to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 22.12.2012.

1

---
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women Workers in 1960: Geographical Differences

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women Workers in 1960: Geographical Differences : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 284*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1962,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5550,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# C_2013304EN.01001902.xml

| 19.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2013 — Leiner v OHIM — Recaro (REVARO)

(Case T-349/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark REVARO - Earlier international word mark RECARO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 304/33

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rudolf Leiner GmbH (Sankt Pölten, Austria) (represented by: W. Emberger, I. Rudnay and L. Emberger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Recaro Holding GmbH, formerly Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: J. Weiser, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 May 2012 (Case R 482/2011-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH and Rudolf Leiner GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rudolf Leiner GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rudolf Leiner GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.14

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fayber Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending  October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Bernard F. Pracko,
II, President,  CEO, and CFO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Bernard F. Pracko, II
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Bernard F. Pracko, II, President/CEO/CFO

Dated:  12/13/02
DISMISSED and Opinion Filed February 5, 2020 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-01346-CR No. 05-19-01347-CR WILLIAM JEREMY NUTT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 401-80013-2014 & 401-80012-2014



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck , Osborne, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Osborne Before the Court is appellant’s January 21, 2020 motion to dism iss these appeals. The
motion is signed by appellant and counsel. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion and
dismiss the appeals.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b) 191346F.U05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

WILLIAM JEREMY NUTT, Appellant

No. 05-19-01346-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-80013-2014. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne, Justices Schenck and Rei chek participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered February 5, 2020–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

WILLIAM JEREMY NUTT, Appellant

No. 05-19-01347-CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401-80012-2014. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne, Justices Schenck and Rei chek participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered February 5, 2020