alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 2 to the 1997 Equity Participation Plan



 Exhibit 10.26 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 
 THE 1997 EQUITY PARTICIPATION PLAN 
 OF 
 INPATIENT CONSULTANTS MANAGEMENT, INC. 
 This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) to The Equity Participation Plan of InPatient Consultants Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“IPCM”), is effective as of April 28, 1999, with reference to the
following: 
 1. InPatient Consultants Management, Inc., a California corporation (“IPCM California”), adopted the 1997 Equity
Participation Plan (the “Plan”), effective October 22, 1997, for the benefit of its eligible employees, consultants and directors. 
 2. The Shareholders of IPCM, successor by merger to IPCM California amended the Plan, effective April 18, 1998, increasing the aggregate number of shares which could be issued upon exercise of options or rights or upon any such award
under the Plan. 
 3. The Shareholders and Directors of IPCM now desire to amend the Plan to further increase the aggregate number of shares
which may be issued upon exercise of options or rights or upon any such award under the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended
as follows: 
 1. As of the date hereof, Article II, Section 2.1(a) of the Plan shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

 1.0.1 Shares Subject to Plan. 
 (a) The shares of stock subject to Options, awards of Restricted Stock, Performance Awards, Dividend Equivalents, awards of Deferred Stock or Stock Payments shall be Common Stock, and initially shares of the
Company’s Common Stock. The aggregate number of such shares which may be issued upon exercise of such options or rights or upon any such awards under the Plan shall not exceed Five Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand (5,250,000). The shares of
Common Stock issuable upon exercise of such options or rights or upon any such awards may be either previously authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. 
  







 2. Except as amended hereby, The 1997 Equity Participation Plan remains in full force and effect.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment this 28th day of April, 1999. 
  

			
	 InPatient Consultants Management, Inc.,
 a
Delaware corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Adam D. Singer, M.D.

		
	Its:	 	 CEO
No. 42086.

#### Protests 248250-G, etc., of J. Sternfeld, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests,
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Securing the bag | 3rd MLG Marines with Bulk Fuel Co. assemble fuel farms

By Lance Cpl. Armando Elizalde3rd Marine Logistics Group

                CAMP HANSEN, Okinawa, Japan  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 3rd Marine Logistics Group website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

3rd Marine Logistics Group9th Engineer Support BattalionCamp Hansenfuelfuel transportation
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jane Doe v. Yum! Brands, Inc.; Pizza Hut, Inc.; Muy Pizza Houston, 

LLC

Appellate case numbers: 01-19-00844-CV, 01-19-00845-CV, 01-19-00846-CV

Trial court case numbers: 2017-42257, 2017-42257A, 2017-42257B

Trial court: 157th District Court of Harris County

The clerk’s record was filed in all three appeals on December 9, 2019 and appellant’s

briefs were due February 7, 2020. Appellant now asserts relevant documents were not included 

in the clerk’s record and, on February 3, 2020, filed requests in the trial court to supplement the 

clerk’s record.

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to continue appellate briefing deadlines in all 

three appeals pending supplementation of the appellate record in each. Appellant’s motion is 

granted. Appellant’s brief in each of the above-referenced appeals is due 30 days from the filing 

of the supplemental clerk’s record.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Russell Lloyd___________

Acting individually 

Date: February 6, 2020
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Marijuana: facts parents needto know.**
 
2004 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 - PDFAZWePub
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3952:M 33/3/
Item Number:0467-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001079915
 
November 21, 2018
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Time Warner Telecom Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Mark A. Peters, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                   
|----- |  | ------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /s/ Mark A. Peters
|Name: |  | Mark A. Peters    
|Date: |  | April 30, 2007
July 6, 2009 

Dear Owner/Resident: 

A Lead Based Paint (LBP) assessment was recently performed on your property by the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site 

investigation. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of 

lead based paint is present on the exterior surface of structures, where deteriorating paint 

conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) exist that might increase lead concentrations in the 

yard above acceptable levels. 

As requested, enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 2432 VANE ST along with a 

LBP Fact Sheet. The EPA is currently developing paint stabilization eligibility criteria and at 

this time can not identify which homes will ultimately be eligible for EPA-funded paint 

stabilization. At present, paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the 

most severe LPB problems, particularly where children under the age of 7 reside. The EPA 

stresses the importance of maintaining painted surfaces where any amount of LBP is present. 

The LBP Fact Sheet provides information pertaining to the EPA’s Exterior LBP Response 

Program. Once the eligibility criterion is finalized (and if your property qualifies) a 

representative from EPA or the Omaha Lead Hazard Control Program (LHCP) will contact you 

to arrange for paint stabilization at your property. 

Exposure to lead contamination can adversely affect the development and behavior of 

young children. If you have children less than seven years of age living in your home, we 

strongly recommend that you contact your doctor or the Douglas County Health Department at 

(402) 444-7825 and arrange to have their blood tested. 

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center 

at (402) 731-3045. 

Sincerely, 

Steve M Langum 

Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. 6601 College Blvd. Overland Park, KS 66211 USA Telephone: 913-458-2900 
Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment 

LEGEND: H-N-P-01-41353 Samples Analyzed 

/ 1 I- BVlD Number 

I 1 ---Sample Number XRF Unit: 7'702 ~ook:232 

/ -Material. P = Pant Date: ;c/OkT,;~e: %qh? L - -S~deof Structure N = North S = South E = East W =West Staff: 

Sample Number Lead Loading StructureIFeature Substrate Color Deteriorated 

(Window, siding, porch, etc.) (Wood, conaete, etc.) Area 

--- - P - - 41353 mgicm2 fta 

c\ LBP-I ! Printed IUSepllR iW711l Ill 23 
Omaha Lead Site North Arrw 

Address: 2432 VANE ST Site Sketch 

LBP Assessment Phone: H: (402) 451-2847 ALT: (402) 697-3485 1 I 

.-.-- --

I 

I I 

Plan View - lndicate number of stories and perimeter dimensions of structure 


Indicate regions of deterioration and describe 


(Deterioration could include surfaces that are worn due to frtctlon, checking, cracking and flakrng, all~gatoring, bllstermg and/or peellng)
EXHIBIT 10.10

AMENDMENT NUMBER 3  TO THE MASTER EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER 3, dated as of April 1, 2002 (the "Amendment") to the Master Equipment Lease Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2001 (as
amended or supplemented from time to time as permitted thereby, the "Head Lease Agreement"), by and between BRL Universal Compression Funding I, L.P. (the "Head Lessor") and UCO Compression LLC (the
"Head Lessee").

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS,
the Head Lessor and the Head Lessee have previously entered into the Head Lease, Amendment Number 1 thereto, dated as of February 8, 2002, and Amendment Number 2 thereto,
dated as of March 29, 2002;

WHEREAS,
the parties desire to further amend the Head Lease in order to modify certain provisions of the Head Lease;

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

SECTION
1.Defined Terms.Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned in
the Head Lease.

SECTION
2.Full Force and Effect.Other than as specifically modified hereby, the Head Lease shall remain in full force and effect in
accordance with the terms and provisions thereof and is hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto.

SECTION
3.Amendment to the Head Lease.Effective on the date hereof, following the execution and delivery hereof, the second sentence of
subsection (a) of Section 14 of the Head Lease is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:



SECTION
4.Effectiveness of Amendment.



SECTION
5.Execution in Counterparts.This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute together but one and the same agreement.

SECTION
6.Governing Law.THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICT OF LAW PRINCIPLES; PROVIDED THAT SECTIONS 5-1401 AND 5-1402 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW SHALL APPLY, AND THE OBLIGATIONS, RIGHTS AND
REMEDIES OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

[Signature
page follows.]

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment on the date first above written.

| |  | BRL UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION
        FUNDING I, L.P., as Head Lessor
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                              
| |  |                                                                  
| |  |                                                                  
| |  |                                                                  
| |  | UCO COMPRESSION LLC, as Head Lessee                              
| |  | By:                                                              
| |  | Name:                                                            
| |  | Title:                                                           

2

---

QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC
                 REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

           Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           To the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form
           10-QSB filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on August
           15, 2002 by Valesc Inc. and to which this certification is appended
           (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of
           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
           the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results of
           operations of Valesc Inc.

Dated: August 15, 2002

                                      /s/ Jeremy Kraus
                                      Jeremy Kraus
                                      Chief Executive Officer



                                      /s/ Samuel Cohen
                                      Samuel Cohen
                                      President and Principal Financial Officer
# C_2015026EN.01000502.xml

| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 November 2014 — European Commission v Poland

(Case C-356/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/676/EEC - Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources - Inadequate definition of waters which are polluted or are vulnerable to pollution - Inadequate classification of vulnerable zones - Action programmes - Deficient measures))

(2015/C 026/06)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Manhaeve and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, in having inadequately defined the waters which are vulnerable to pollution by nitrates from agricultural sources, in having inadequately classified vulnerable zones and in having adopted action programmes, as provided for under Article 5 of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, which include measures which are incompatible with the directive, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of Directive 91/676, read in conjunction with Annex I thereto, and under Article 5 of that directive, read in conjunction with Annexes II A(2) and III(1)(1) thereto. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, in having inadequately defined the waters which are vulnerable to pollution by nitrates from agricultural sources, in having inadequately classified vulnerable zones and in having adopted action programmes, as provided for under Article 5 of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, which include measures which are incompatible with the directive, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 3 of Directive 91/676, read in conjunction with Annex I thereto, and under Article 5 of that directive, read in conjunction with Annexes II A(2) and III(1)(1) thereto.

| 2. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 10.12

MOTOR VEHICLE PURCHASING AGREEMENT

PARTY A:  ________________________ (FIRST AUTOMOBILE)

PARTY B:  SHENZHEN JINZHENGHUA TRANSPORT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD.

A purchase order has been issued by Party B in 1998 to Party A for purchase of
motor vehicles. After a detailed negotiation, the following purchase agreement
has been established.

1.   Model, quantity, price and time and place of delivery.  Party B order 1000 
     units of ______________ at RMB165,000 each and 2000 units of __________ at 
     RMB114,000 each.

     Time and place of delivery: Party A has to deliver items to the location
     specified by Party B within 20 days after the demand for delivery from Part
     B.

2    Payment method
     Party B should pay a down payment of RMB350,000 for each motor vehicle at
     the time of receiving motor vehicles. The outstanding balance should be
     settled within one year. No interest expense on the outstanding balance is
     required if Party B can settle the full outstanding balances within one
     year. Party A can entitle 1% interest income charged to Party B on the
     outstanding balance not yet settled after one year. Party A has to arrange
     stock out procedures after receiving the down payment from Party B.

3.   Party A should ensure the required quality of motor vehicles, completion of
     handling procedures of motor vehicles according to agreed schedule.

4.   Party B should ensure proper settlement and fulfill the requirements of 
     point 2.

5.   This is a general motor vehicle purchasing agreement. Due to the long term
     nature of the agreement, the market purchase price may be changed. New
     purchase price can be used subject to the agreement of mutual parties. A
     new agreement must be signed as a supplement if the unit price of motor
     vehicle has been changed.

6.   This agreement should be signed by both parties, any party can not
     terminate the agreement. Any unresolved items arisen between the parties
     can be solved by mutual agreement, any party breaches this agreement may be
     subject to the penalty under PRC Company.

7.   There are three copies of this agreement. Each party keeps one copy. The
     remaining copy is kept for reserve.
[consentindependentauditor002.gif]



















June 30, 2005









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS







For this Form 40-F Annual Report for Desert Sun Mining Corp., we hereby consent to the inclusion or incorporation by reference of our report dated February 22, 2005 except for Note 17 which is as at March 4, 2005 in connection with our audits of the financial statements of the Company as at December 31, 2004 and August 31, 2003 and for the sixteen-month period ended December 31, 2004 and the year ended August 31, 2003.







McGOVERN, HURLEY, CUNNINGHAM, LLP

[consentindependentauditor004.gif]

Chartered Accountants































F:\DATA\WP51\Marty.d\Desert Sun Mining Corp\Consent-Independent Auditors-40F-dtd30June2005.doc
# C_2013026EN.01006602.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/66

---

Action brought on 22 November 2012 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — English Cut (The English Cut)

(Case T-515/12)

2013/C 26/131

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela, J. Rivas Zurdo and I. Munilla Muñoz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The English Cut, SL (Malaga, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 September 2012 in Case R 1673/2011-1, and declare that, pursuant to Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, the action brought by the opponent before OHIM should have been upheld and the decision of the Opposition Division to grant Community trade mark application No 8 868 747‘The English Cut’ (word mark) should have been annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 September 2012 in Case R 1673/2011-1, and declare that, pursuant to Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, the action brought by the opponent before OHIM should have been upheld and the decision of the Opposition Division to grant Community trade mark application No 8 868 747‘The English Cut’ (word mark) should have been annulled;

| — | order the defendant and the other party opposing this action to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and the other party opposing this action to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The English Cut, SL

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘The English Cut’, for goods in Class 25 — Community trade mark application No 8 868 747

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and Community word and figurative marks ‘El Corte Inglés’ for goods in Classes 25 and 35

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 8(5) of that regulation.

Pleas in law:

---