### 33548 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Notices

jobs; and (3) determine whether LQGs have developed adequate procedures torespond to unplanned sudden or nonsudden releases of hazardous waste or hazardous constituents to air, soil, or surface water. This information is also needed to help EPA determine whether tank systems are operated in a manner that is fully protective of human health and the environment and to ensure that releases to the environment are managed quickly and efficiently. Additionally, this information contributes to EPA’s goal of preventing contamination of the environment from hazardous waste accumulation practices, including contamination from equipment leaks and process vents. Export information is needed to ensure that: (1) Foreign governments consent to U.S. exported wastes; (2) exported waste is actually managed at facilities listed in the original notifications; and (3) documents are available for compliance audits and enforcement actions.

Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are private business or other for-profit.

Respondent’s obligation to respond: mandatory (40 CFR Part 262 and 265).

Estimated number of respondents: 90,675.

Frequency of response: Occasionally and biennially.

Total estimated burden: 275,842 Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).

Total estimated cost: $15,046,505, which includes $14,991,809 annualized labor costs and $54,696 annualized capital or O&M costs.

Changes in Estimates: The burden hours are likely to stay substantially the

same.

Dated: May 2, 2014. Barnes Johnson, Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery.
[FR Doc. 2014–13625 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9909–32–Region 2]**

**Notice of Availability of Draft NPDES General Permit for Small Municipal**  **Separate Storm Sewer Systems in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and**  **Federal Facilities Within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of Draft NPDES General Permit. **SUMMARY :**  The Director of the Caribbean Environmental Protection Division (CEPD), Environmental Protection Agency—Region 2 (EPA), is issuing this Notice of a Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit, PRR040000/PRR04000F, for discharges from small municipal separate storm sewer systems (small MS4) from urbanized areas within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to waters of the United States. This draft NPDES general permit establishes Notice of Intent (NOI) requirements, standards, prohibitions and management practices for discharges of storm water from small MS4s urbanized areas. A prior Notice of Availability of a draft general permit was issued by EPA in November 2005. EPA has substantially modified the draft general permit and is issuing a new draft general permit pursuant to 40 CFR part 124.

**DATES :**  Public comments must be received on or before August 11, 2014. Within the comment period, interested persons may request a public hearing pursuant to 40 CFR part 124 concerning the proposed permit. Requests for a public hearing must be sent or delivered in writing to the same address as provided below for public comments prior to the close of the comment period. Requests for a public hearing must state the nature of the issues proposed to be raised in the hearing. Pursuant to 40 CFR part 124, EPA shall hold a public hearing if it finds, on the basis of requests, a significant degree of public interest in a public hearing on the proposed permit. If EPA decides to hold a public hearing, a public notice of the date, time and place of the hearing will be made at least 30 days prior to the hearing.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments by one of the following methods:

1. Mail: Multimedia Permits and Compliance Branch, US EPA Region 2, City View Plaza II, Suite 7000, 48 Road 165 Km 1.2, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico

00968–8069.

2. Email: Bosques.Sergio@epa.gov

. The draft permit is based on an administrative record available for public review at EPA—Region 2, Caribbean Environmental Protection Division, City View Plaza II, Suite 7000, 48 Road 165 Km 1.2, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968–8069. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying requests. However, the draft general permit and fact sheet are available at EPA’s Web site: www.epa.gov/region02/water/ permits.html

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Additional information concerning the draft permit may be obtained between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday excluding holidays from: Sergio Bosques, Caribbean Environmental Protection Division, US EPA Region 2, City View Plaza II, Suite 7000, 48 Road 165 Km 1.2, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968–8069; telephone: 787–977–5870; or email: Bosques.Sergio@epa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  EPA is proposing to reissue the draft NPDES general permit for the discharge of stormwater from small MS4s to waters within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The permit describes three distinct small MS4s. These are the conventional cities and towns; Non-Conventional state, federal and other publicly owned systems; and Non-Conventional transportation systems.

The conditions in the draft permit are established pursuant to Clean Water Act (CWA) Part 402(p)(3)(iii) to ensure that pollutant discharges from small municipal separate storm sewer systems (small MS4s) are reduced to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), protect water quality, and satisfy the appropriate water quality requirements of the CWA. The term small municipal separate storm sewer system is available in 40 CFR part 122.26(b). In addition, this term also includes systems similar to separate storm sewer systems and flood management conveyances in municipalities such as military bases, large hospital or prison complexes, highways, and flood control pump stations, and other thoroughfares. The term does not include separate storm sewers in very discrete areas, such as individual buildings. For example, an armory located in an urbanized area would not be considered a regulated small MS4.

The draft general permit sets forth the requirements for the small MS4 to ‘‘reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control techniques, and system, design and engineering methods’’ (See Section 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the CWA). MEP is the statutory standard that establishes the level of pollutant reductions that MS4 operators must achieve. EPA believes that implementation of best management practices (BMPs) designed to control storm water runoff from the MS4 is generally the most appropriate approach for reducing pollutants to satisfy the MEP standard. Pursuant to 40 CFR 122.44(k), the draft permit contains BMPs, including development and implementation of a comprehensive stormwater management program (SWMP) as the mechanism to achieve the required pollutant reductions.


### 33549 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 2014 / Notices

Section 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of CWA also authorizes EPA to include in an MS4 permit ‘‘such other provisions as [EPA] determine[s] appropriate for control of . . . pollutants.’’ This provision forms a basis for imposing water quality-based effluent limitations (WQBELs), consistent with the authority in Section 301(b)(1)(C) of the CWA. See Defenders of Wildlife v. Browner, 191 F.3d 1159, 1166–67 (9th Cir. 1999); 64 FR 68722, 68753, 68788 (Dec. 8, 1999). Accordingly, the draft permit contains the water quality-based effluent limitations, expressed in terms of BMPs, which EPA has determined are necessary and appropriate under the CWA.

EPA issued a final general permit to address stormwater discharges from small MS4s on November 6, 2006. The 2006 general permit required small MS4s to develop and implement a SWMP designed to control pollutants to the maximum extent practicable and protect water quality. This draft permit builds on the requirements of the previous general permit.

EPA views the MEP standard in the CWA as an iterative process. MEP should continually adapt to current conditions and BMP effectiveness. Compliance with the requirements of this general permit will meet the MEP standard. The iterative process of MEP consists of a municipality developing a program consistent with specific permit requirements, implementing the program, evaluating the effectiveness of the BMPs included as part of the program, then revising those parts of the program that are not effective at controlling pollutants, then implementing the revisions, and evaluating again. The changes contained in the draft general permit reflect the iterative process of MEP. Accordingly, the draft general permit contains more specific tasks and details than the 2006 general permit.

EPA has explained in the draft general permit fact sheet a summary of permit conditions. The draft general permit and fact sheet are available at EPA’s Web site: www.epa.gov/region02/water/ permits.html

. Other Legal Requirements A. Endangered Species Act (ESA)

The provisions related to the ESA have been enhanced from those in the 2006 draft permit. EPA will be requesting concurrence from the appropriate Federal services (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service) in connection with the 2014 draft and has renewed this request for the new Draft Permit. B. Executive Order 12866 EPA has determined that this general permit is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is therefore not subject to OMB review. C. Paperwork Reduction Act

The information collection requirements of this permit were previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., and assigned OMB control number

2040–0004. D. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires that EPA prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for rules subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) that have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. However, general NPDES permits are not ‘‘rules’’ subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and are therefore not subject to the RFA. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), Public Law 104–4, generally requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their ‘‘regulatory actions’’ (defined to be the same as ‘‘rules’’ subject to the RFA) on tribal, state, and local governments and the private sector. However, general NPDES permits are not ‘‘rules’’ subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and are therefore not subject to the RFA or the UMRA.

Authority: This action is being taken under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.

Dated: April 9, 2014. Jose  ́ C. Font, Director, Caribbean Environmental Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–13593 Filed 6–10–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0009; FRL–9911–58]**

**Pesticide Products; Registration Applications for New Active**  **Ingredients; Correction**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice; correction.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of April 18, 2014, (79 FR 21919) concerning pending registration applications for pesticide products containing an active ingredient not included in any currently registered pesticide products. This document corrects the erroneous reference of establishing a Guideline Reference Level (GRL) for residues of oxathiapiprolin in or on tobacco, dried leaves. The United States does not establish GRLs and this reference was an error.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Lois Rossi, Registration Division (7505P), email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov; telephone number: (703) 305–7090, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me?

The Agency included in the Federal Register notice of April 18, 2014 (79 FR 21919) (FRL–9908–54) notice a list of those who may be potentially affected by this action. B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0009, is available

at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What does this correction do?

FR Doc. 2014–08769 published in the Federal Register of April 18, 2014 (79 FR 21920) (FRL–9908–54) on page 21920 under Unit II. paragraph 1. is corrected to read as follows:

1. EPA File Symbols: 352–ION, 352– IOR, and 352–IOE. Docket ID Number: EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0114. Applicant: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, 1007 Market St., Wilmington, DE 19898. Active Ingredient: Oxathiapiprolin. Product Type: Fungicide. Proposed Uses: Imported grapes; root and tuber vegetables, tuberous and corm vegetables (crop group 1C); bulb vegetables, onion, bulb (crop subgroup 3–07A); bulb vegetables, onion, green