alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015398EN.01003201.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2015 — Intrasoft International v Commission

(Case T-403/12) (1)

1

((Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Technical assistance to the Customs Administration of Serbia to support the modernisation of the customs system - Conflict of interests - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid by the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia - Implicit rejection of the complaint against the rejection of the bid))

(2015/C 398/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Intrasoft International SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and E. Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 10 August 2012, acting through the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia, stating that the tendering procedure EuropeAid/131367/C/SER/RS, entitled ‘Technical assistance to the Customs Administration of Serbia to support the modernisation of the customs’ (OJ 2011/S 160-262712), could not be awarded to the consortium of which Intrasoft International SA was a part, and secondly, an application for the annulment of the alleged implicit decision rejecting the complaint made by the applicant against the letter of the 10 August 2012.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision rejecting the tender of the consortium of which Intrasoft International SA was part, contained in the letter of 10 August 2012 drafted by the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia as the European Commission’s subdelegated contracting authority and relating to the tendering procedure EuropeAid/131367/C/SER/RS, entitled ‘Technical assistance to the Customs Administration of Serbia to support the modernisation of the customs system’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision rejecting the tender of the consortium of which Intrasoft International SA was part, contained in the letter of 10 August 2012 drafted by the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia as the European Commission’s subdelegated contracting authority and relating to the tendering procedure EuropeAid/131367/C/SER/RS, entitled ‘Technical assistance to the Customs Administration of Serbia to support the modernisation of the customs system’;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 343, 10.11.2012.

1

---
### Vicki Hamilton From: Sent: Dixie Putnam <dixieputnam@hotmail.com> Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:04 PM To: Vicki Hamilton Subject: 

### EAS
Dock Operations M-30 West Building Ground Floor W-12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590; 3 United.States ofAmerica Department ofTransportation

Office ofSecretary Washington DC RE: Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605
As a senior citizen, and longtime resident of Miles City I am very concerned that our community is in danger of losing its air service. Having access to Essential Air service is importantto me. Without EAS it will become increasingly difficultto travel, when Iwanttotake vacations, visit family, or keep medical appointments. Miles City is an isolated community with an aging population. Many senior citizens do notfeel safe driving over 140 miles on the interstate, especially in winter. We have notrain service, and our bus service is increasingly unreliable. I urge youto consider NOT enforcingthe Order ofShow Cause and give the EAS Task Force timeto work on solutions to increase ridership. Please do not make our community more isolated than it is already. Sincerely, Dixie Putnam

1
# C_2014409EN.01001701.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — Vilniaus energija UAB v Lietuvos metrologijos inspekcijos Vilniaus apskrities skyrius

(Case C-423/13) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of goods - Measures having equivalent effect - Directive 2004/22/EC - Metrological verification of measuring systems - Hot-water meter satisfying all the requirements of that directive and connected to a remote (telemetric) data-transmission device - Prohibition of the use of that meter without a prior metrological verification of the system))

2014/C 409/23

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vilniaus energija UAB

Applicant:

Defendant: Lietuvos metrologijos inspekcijos Vilniaus apskrities skyrius

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 34 TFEU and Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on measuring instruments must be interpreted as precluding national legislation and practice according to which a hot-water meter which satisfies all the requirements of that directive and is connected to a remote (telemetric) data-transmission device is to be regarded as a measuring system and, as a result, cannot be used for its intended purpose so long as it has not been subject, together with that device, to a metrological verification as a measuring system.

---

(1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# New Hill Distribution Center director visits DLA Distribution Headquarters

By DLA Distribution Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              DLA Distribution Hill, Utah’s, new director, Jim McArthur visited DLA Distribution Headquarters in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania for orientation the week of Jan. 23 to 26.  
McArthur’s inaugural visit to the New Cumberland headquarters site was structured so he was able to meet with each directorate, as well as attend office calls with DLA Distribution commanding general, Army Brig. Gen. John S. Laskodi and Distribution deputy commander, Twila Gonzales, SES.

To finish off the week, McArthur visited the network’s largest distribution site, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, where he toured the Eastern Distribution Center, the network’s model for innovation and technology.  

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionDLA Distribution HillUtahJim McArthur
#### Frederick POLLARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-3365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 15, 1999.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Laura Fullerton Lopez, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

• In this direct criminal appeal, appellant contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation and to sentence him to six months in the county jail because the probation revocation process was not commenced until after his probationary term had expired. The state properly concedes error. *See State v. Boyd,*717 So.2d 524 (Fla.1998), *approving,*699 So.2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); *Tatum v. State,*24 Fla. L. Weekly D1261, 736 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, we reverse, and remand with directions that the order revoking probation and the judgment and sentence entered subsequent thereto be vacated; that the affidavit alleging a violation of probation be dismissed; and that appellant be discharged.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

KAHN, WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ concur.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 3190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-997]



[[Page 3190]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5668]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open 
meeting at 1 p.m. on Thursday, March 1, 2007, in Room 6319 of the 
United States Coast Guard Headquarters Building, 2100 2nd Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20593-0001. The primary purpose of the meeting is to 
continue preparations for the 50th Session of the International 
Maritime Organization (IMO) Sub-Committee on Stability and Load Lines 
and on Fishing Vessels Safety to be held at the International Coffee 
Organization in London, England from April 30 to May 4, 2007.
    The primary matters to be considered include:

--Development of explanatory notes for harmonized SOLAS Chapter II-1;
--Revision of the Intact Stability Code;
--Passenger ship safety / Time dependent survivability;
--Guidance on the impact of open watertight doors on survivability;
--Safety of small fishing vessels;
--Development of options to improve effect on ship design and safety of 
the 1969 TM Convention;
--Guidelines for uniform operating limitations on high-speed craft;
--Review of the Special Purpose Ships (SPS) Code.

    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing to Mr. Paul Cojeen, Commandant (CG-3PSE-2), U.S. Coast Guard 
Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., Room 1308, Washington, DC 20593-
0001 or by calling (202) 372-1372.

    Dated: January 18, 2007.
Michael E. Tousley,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
 [FR Doc. E7-997 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
No. 47705.

#### Protests 869877-G, etc., of Allied Stores, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 74-5815.

#### Murphy *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1912 

To prohibit the Department of Energy from subordinating its position in 

energy loan guarantees to outside investors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2011 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. COBURN, and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Department of Energy from subordinating 

its position in energy loan guarantees to outside investors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. The Secretary of Energy shall not issue 

4 any loan guarantee under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 

5 (42 U.S.C. 15801 et seq.) that, in any circumstances at 

6 the time of, or subsequent to, the issuance of the loan 

7 guarantee, makes the Secretary subordinate to other fi8 nancing. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[111th Congress Public Law 109]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ109.111]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3021]]

Public Law 111-109
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2777 Logan Avenue in San Diego, California, as the ``Cesar E. Chavez 
           Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2009 -  [S. 748]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CESAR E. CHAVEZ POST OFFICE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2777 Logan Avenue in San Diego, California, and known as the 
Southeastern Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Cesar 
E. Chavez Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cesar E. 
Chavez Post Office''.

    Approved November 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 748:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Aug. 4, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 5, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
### 1

August 11 , 2015

Petition for Summary Grant of Amendment

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition to Amend Exemption 12269 (FAA

- 2015

- 2137) on behalf of Galloway Advisors, LLC
, pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

Dear Sir or Madam:

On July 31 , 2015, you granted Galloway Advisors, LLC’s Petition for Exemption (12269) . Operations were
limited to the DJI S1000+, DJI Phantom 2 Vision + and DJI Inspire 1 platforms

. Galloway Advisors seeks to

add additional s UAS platforms to its Exemption

.

To wit, Galloway Advisors seeks to add the following platforms:

 PrecisionHaw k Hawkeye Mk

- 111

 PrecisionHawk Lancaster

 AgEagle

 Sensefly Ebee

 DJI Phantom 3



### All of these platforms have previously been approved by your offices:

 PrecisionHawk Hawkeye Mk

- 111 (12015, 11345, 11551)

 PrecisoinHawk Lancaster (11905 )

 AgEagle (12263, 11504)

 Sensefly Eb ee (11263, 11339, 11797 &11916)

 DJI Phantom 3 (12154, 11953) 1022 Highland Colony Parkway
Suite 101 Ridgeland, MS 39157
P: 601.898.8400
F: 601.898.8420

www.tr g law yers .com kris@trglawyers.com

### 2

Accordingly, the undersigned adopts and incorporates the arguments, amendments and attachments that prior Petitioners have filed in support of grants of exemption for t he above referenced platforms , adopts and incorporates Galloway Advisors ’ s original Petition for Exemption, and requests a s ummary grant of amendment to its original Pet it ion to add the aforementioned sUAS platforms.

Respectfully submitted,

This the 11 th day of August , 2015.

/s/ Kristopher A. Graham
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter period ending September 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for thepurposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 orotherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expresslyincorporated by reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated:  November 19, 2004 | /s/Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                                | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.    |
|                                | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C Section 1350has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.0

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

1)       Bone-Dry Enterprises, Inc., a Georgia corporation which operates under
         the following tradenames: Andrews Environmental, Bone-Dry Enterprises
         and Quality Plumbing and Septic.
2)       SanTi Group of Florida, Inc., a Georgia corporation which operates
         under the following tradenames: Brownie Environmental Services,
         Grease-Tec and A Rapid Rooter Sewer and Drain.
3)       SanTi Group of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Georgia corporation which
         operates under the following tradenames: Ferrero Wastewater Management
         and Eldredge Wastewater Management.
4)       SanTi Group of New York, Inc., a Georgia corporation which operates
         under the following tradenames: RGM Liquid Waste Removal and Devito
         Environmental.
5)       Nutrecon, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation.
6)       Reifsneider Transportation, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation.
7)       Brehm's Cesspool, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation.
8)       National Plumbing & Drain, Inc., a Georgia corporation.
9)       Magnum Environmental, Inc., a Florida corporation.
10)      Food Service Technologies, Inc., a Texas corporation.
11)      Hulsey Plumbing, Heating and Cooling, Inc., a Georgia corporation.
12)      Hulsey Environmental Services, Inc., a Georgia corporation.
13)      International Petroleum Corporation, a Florida corporation.
14)      International Petroleum Corporation of Louisiana, a Louisiana
         corporation.
15)      International Petroleum Corporation of Maryland, a Maryland
         corporation.
16)      International Petroleum Corporation of Georgia, a Georgia corporation.
17)      International Petroleum Corporation of Delaware, a Delaware
         corporation.
18)      International Petroleum Corporation of Pennsylvania, a Pennsylvania
         corporation.
19)      International Petroleum Corporation of Lafayette, a Louisiana
         corporation.
20)      International Environmental Services, Inc., a Florida corporation.
21)      All County Resource Management Corporation, a New Jersey corporation.
Before the Second Division,

January 20, 1939

No. 40481.

#### Protests 657364-G, etc., of Rolland Frères, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of outerwear or other articles, knit, wholly or in chief value of wool the same as that involved in Abstract 36548. It was therefore held dutiable at 50 cents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114 as claimed.
# C_2014102EN.01001201.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/12

---

Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 November 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the 5a Vara Cível de Lisboa — Portugal) — Sociedade Agrícola e Imobiliária da Quinta de S. Paio Lda v Instituto da Segurança Social IP

a

(Case C-258/13) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to an effective remedy - Legal persons pursuing a commercial objective - Legal aid - No link with European Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 102/15

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

5a Vara Cível de Lisboa

a

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sociedade Agrícola e Imobiliária da Quinta de S. Paio Lda

Applicant:

Defendant: Instituto da Segurança Social IP

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Varas Cíveis de Lisboa — Interpretation of Articles 6 and 267 TFEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2000 C 364, p. 1) — Right to an effective remedy — National legislation excluding legal persons pursuing a commercial objective from obtaining legal aid — Exemption from the legal charges applicable to those legal persons where they are insolvent or have entered into a composition with creditors.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court manifestly has no jurisdiction to rule on the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the 5a Vara Cível de Lisboa (Portugal) in its decision of 13 March 2013 (Case C-258/13).

a

---

(1)  OJ C 215, 27.7.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 10.10


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO


THE WASHINGTON SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B. 2001 STOCK OPTION
AND INCENTIVE


PLAN


 


                                WSB Holdings, Inc.
sponsors The Washington Bank, F.S.B. 2001 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  The Plan is hereby amended as set forth
below:


 


1.               All references to “The
Washington Savings Bank, F.S.B.” shall be replaced with “WSB Holdings, Inc.”
and the “Company” shall refer to “WSB Holdings, Inc.”


 


2.               Except as amended above, the
Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WSB Holdings, Inc.
has executed this Plan Amendment Number 1 to The Washington Savings Bank,
F.S.B. 2001 Omnibus Stock Plan as of this 16th day of January, 2008.


 


	
   

  	
  WSB
  Holdings, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Phillip C. Bowman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Phillip C. Bowman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  



 


 


	
  ATTEST:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Cheryl Golden