Interim Decision #2112 

MATTER OF A— 

In Visa Petition Proceedings 

A-18349097 

Decided by Board December 13, 1971 

Under the law of Michigan (section 551.51, Compiled Laws, 1948, and section 551.202 of the Compiled Laws, as amended June 30, 1967), the marriage in that State of a female under the age of consent (16) performed 

by a probate judge, as in the instant case, is valid where application for a 

marriage license was made to a probate judge, "under oath, containing a 

statement that she is with child, . . . or has lived with a man and has 

been considered as his wife, or for other good reason," and such application was accompanied by the written request of the parent or guardian of 

such female under marriageable age. 

ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: Arpo Yemen, Esquire 

7527 Lafayette Street 

Dearborn Heights, Michigan 48127 

The petitioner, a native of Jordan, was admitted to the United 

States for permanent residence at the port of New York on 

March 24, 1968. She appeals from an order of the District Director at Detroit, Michigan, dated October 12, 1971, denying her petition for second preference classification of the beneficiary, a native of Jerusalem. Exceptions have been taken to the District 

Director's finding that the petitioner's marriage to the beneficiary 

is invalid under the laws of Michigan. 

The petitioner married the beneficiary at Detroit, Michigan on 

August 31, 1971. She attained the age of 15 years on September 

12, 1971. Section 551.51, Compiled Laws of Michigan, 1948, provides in substance that.the marriage of a female under the age of 

consent, 16 years, is void; also see section 25.51, Michigan Statutes Annotated. Section 551.51, supra, has a proviso which permits a probate judge of any county of the State of Michigan to 

perform a marriage under the conditions set forth in section 

551.202 of the Compiled Laws of Michigan, as amended June 30, 

1967, Public Act No. 175, where one or both of the parties are 

under the age of consent. 

824 
Interim Decision #2112 

Section 551.202 provides in substance that a probate judge of 

each county in the state has authority : 

. . . to issue, without publicity, a marriage license to any female making 

application to him, under oath, containing a statement that she is with child, 

which if born alive before marriage will become a bastard, or has lived with 

a man and has been considered as his wife, or for other good reason, expressed in such application and deemed to be sufficient by the judge of probate. 

Section 551.202 also provides the judge of probate with authority "to marry persons under marriageable age" under the conditions set forth above and the application for such license is accompanied by the written request: 

. . . of the parent or guardian of the one under marriageable age, where 

only one is under the marriageable age now fixed by the statute, when according to his judgement, such marriage would be a benefit to public morals. 

The judge of probate is also authorized "to keep the exact date of 

the marriage a secret, to protect the good name of [the female 

applicant] and the reputation of her family." 

The case of Evans v. Ross, 309 Mich. 149, 14 N.W. 2d 815 

(1944), concerns a suit by a husband to have his marriage declared void on the ground that his wife was under the age of consent when he married her in 1943. The application for the marriage license falsely stated that the wife was 19 years of age at 

the time of the application for the license. The parties separated 

prior to the wife's sixteenth birthday and did not cohabit following the separation. The court said that the language used in section 551.51, supra, "strongly indicates that it was the intention of 

the legislature to make such marriages void, except marriages 

performed by the judge of probate." (Emphasis supplied.) The 

marriage under consideration by the court was not performed by 

a judge of probate. 

The Attorney General of Michigan has ruled that a probate 

judge has discretion whether to issue a marriage license under 

the provisions of section 551.202, supra, but if he does issue the 

license, it becomes his duty to perform the marriage ceremony, 

unless one or both of the parties desire to have a ceremony performed by another person competent to perform a ceremonial 

marriage in the State of Michigan (Opinions of Attorney General 

of Michigan, No. 3626, March 13, 1962). 

The petitioner herein was married by a judge of probate in the 

County of Wayne, State of Michigan, in the presence of her parents. The certificate of marriage is undated. Under the laws of 

Michigan the marriage is valid. It is alleged that there was a reli825 
Interim Decision #2112 

gious ceremony performed by the pastor of St. Bernadette Roman 

Catholic Church on September 25, 1971. We conclude that the petitioner can legally confer second preference status upon the beneficiary. An appropriate order will be entered. 

ORDER: The appeal is hereby sustained and the visa petition 

filed on behalf of J-0---A— for second preference classification 

is hereby granted. 

826