alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

September 19, 1940

No. 44355.

#### Protest 967550-G of Greene Trading Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the immediate containers of the oil were not marked but that the wooden cases were properly marked. On the authority of *Givaudan*v. *United States*(22 C. C. P. A. 115, T. D. 47104) the. protest was overruled.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 3D printing in the Marine Corps: An industry of untapped potential

By Cpl. Joseph Prado1st Marine Division

*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 1st Marine Division website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

7th Marine Regimentcamp pendleton3D printingAdditive Manufacturing1st Maintenance Battalionparts
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1961-65: Part 3. Ohio River basin: Volume 4. Ohio River basin below Wabash River

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1910

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 45300.

#### Protests 977577-G/88332, etc., of Spiegel Bros. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

These protests were submitted without the introduction of any evidence. On the record presented the protests were overruled.
# C_2014395EN.01001501.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/15

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2014 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission

(Case C-197/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Cohesion fund - Reduction of the financial assistance - Adoption of the decision by the European Commission - Existence of a time-limit - Failure to comply with the time-limit - Consequences))

(2014/C 395/17)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Spain v Commission (T-540/10, EU:T:2013:47); |
| --- | --- |

1)

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Spain v Commission (T-540/10, EU:T:2013:47);

| 2) | Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 6154 of 13 September 2010 reducing the assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund to the stages of projects entitled ‘High Speed Line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell (Platform). Subsection IX-A’ (CCI No 2001.ES.16.C.PT.005), ‘High Speed Line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell (Platform). Subsection X-B (Avinyonet del Penedés-Sant Sadurní d’Anoia)’ (CCI No 2001.ES.16.C.PT.008), ‘High Speed Line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell (Platform). Subsections XI-A and XI-B (Sant Sadurní d’Anoia-Gelida)’ (CCI No 2001.ES.16.C.PT.009), ‘High Speed Line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell (Platform). Subsection IX-C’ (CCI No 2001.ES.16.C.PT.010); |
| --- | --- |

2)

Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 6154 of 13 September 2010 reducing the assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund to the stages of projects entitled ‘High Speed Line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell (Platform). Subsection IX-A’ (CCI No 2001.ES.16.C.PT.005), ‘High Speed Line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell (Platform). Subsection X-B (Avinyonet del Penedés-Sant Sadurní d’Anoia)’ (CCI No 2001.ES.16.C.PT.008), ‘High Speed Line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell (Platform). Subsections XI-A and XI-B (Sant Sadurní d’Anoia-Gelida)’ (CCI No 2001.ES.16.C.PT.009), ‘High Speed Line Madrid-Zaragoza-Barcelona-French border. Section Lleida-Martorell (Platform). Subsection IX-C’ (CCI No 2001.ES.16.C.PT.010);

| 3) | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the Kingdom of Spain and to bear its own costs of both the proceedings at first instance and the present appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the Kingdom of Spain and to bear its own costs of both the proceedings at first instance and the present appeal proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 178, 22.6.2013.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# February NEO Cancelled

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Careers L&MCommunity L&MCulture L&Mnew employee L&MResource the Enterprise L&MDLA L&M
No. 49517.

#### Protests 848339-G, etc., of H. P. Cann & Bro. Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

*337Opinion by

Ttlson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Third Division,

October 29, 1942.

No. 47692.

#### Protest 812959-G/85428 of Chee Wo Tong Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372), certain *441of the drugs were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669, as claimed, and others held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as drugs advanced in value or condition.
# C_2012295EN.01002702.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/27

---

Action brought on 23 July 2012 — Rocket Dog Brands v OHIM — Julius-K9 (K9 PRODUCTS)

(Case T-338/12)

2012/C 295/49

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): Rocket Dog Brands LLC (Hayward, United States) (represented by: J. Reid, Barrister)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Julius-K9 bt (Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 21 May 2012 (R 1961/2011-4) insofar as it rejects the action in relation to all goods in class 25, and the following goods in class 18 namely goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; wallets, purses; purses, not of precious metal; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 21 May 2012 (R 1961/2011-4) insofar as it rejects the action in relation to all goods in class 25, and the following goods in class 18 namely goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; wallets, purses; purses, not of precious metal; and

| — | Order the proprietor to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the proprietor to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark ‘K9 PRODUCTS’ in black and white, for among others goods in classes 18 and 25 — Community trade mark registration No 5966031

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Community trade mark registration No 3933256 of the figurative mark ‘K9’ in black and white, for goods in class 25

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the Community trade mark partially invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision to the extent it declared the CTM invalid and rejected the cancellation request in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1) (b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John M. HAYDEL, Jr., a/k/a “Ice Cream” and “Mugsy”, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 80-3254.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.* Unit A

Dec. 17, 1981.

Virgil M. Wheeler, Jr., New Orleans, La., Herbert Shafer, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

*85C. Michael Hill, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

*

 Former Fifth Circuit case, Section 9(1) of Public Law 96-452 — October 14, 1980.

**

 Senior Judge of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 8, 5 Cir., 1981, 649 F.2d 1152).

Before SKELTON **, Senior Judge, RUBIN and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The opinion is corrected so that the last paragraph before Part I of the opinion reads as follows:

> “Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, five of the remaining counts were dismissed. Haydel stipulated that his trial on four counts would be to the court on the stipulated testimony of five U.S. Special Agents and certain exhibits listed on a stipulated exhibit list, subject to the objections previously raised by Haydel and his motions to suppress. Sitting without a jury, the district court found that Haydel had made a material understatement of his income and that he was guilty of all four counts of violating the applicable tax statute, 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1). Haydel was sentenced to one year on the first count and five years of probation on the remaining three counts.”

With this correction, the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge of this Administrative Unit in regular active service having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 16; Fifth Circuit Judicial Council Resolution of January 14, 1981), the suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
  I, Edward A. Keible, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Endwave Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls.   Date: August 13, 2004 /s/ EDWARD A. KEIBLE, JR.   Edward A. Keible, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.27



ADDENDUM TO ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT



This Addendum (the Addendum) is entered into as of January 1, 2006, by and among MARYLAND RADIATION THERAPY
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., a Maryland corporation (MANAGEMENT SERVICES) and KATIN RADIATION THERAPY, P.A., a Maryland professional corporation (the PA). This Addendum amends Section 3.1 of the Administrative Services
Agreement dated October 31, 1998 between the parties (the Agreement) to adjust the monthly Service Fee of $9,585.00 paid in 2005 to a monthly Service Fee of $12,500.00, and replaces the Addendum of that same Section dated
April 1, 2005. From and after the date hereof, Section 3.1 shall read as follows:



3.1. Service Fee. For the services to be provided hereunder by MANAGEMENT SERVICES, the PA shall pay to MANAGEMENT SERVICES a
monthly Service Fee of $12,500.00. The parties agree that the Service Fee represents the fair market value of the services provided by MANAGEMENT SERVICES hereunder and that the parties shall meet annually to reevaluate the value of services
provided by MANAGEMENT SERVICES and shall establish the fair market value thereof for purposes of this Section 3.1.



|          |  |                                                      |  |                             
|--------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Accepted: |  | MARYLAND RADIATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
|          |  |                                                     
|          |  | By:                                                  |  | /s/ David Koeninger         
|          |  |                                                      |  | David Koeninger             
|          |  |                                                      |  | Vice President & CFO        
|          | 
|Accepted: |  | KATIN RADIATION THERAPY, P.A.                       
|          |  |                                                     
|          |  | By:                                                  |  | /s/ Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D.
|          |  |                                                      |  | Daniel E. Dosoretz, M.D.    
|          |  |                                                      |  | Vice President
(Reap. Dec. 9085)

#### Lang & Marshall Company, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 917573, etc.

(Decided February 25, 1958)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of this decision, were submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties to the effect that the market values at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by the said appeals for reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers for home consumption in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the values set forth in the right-hand column of the said schedule “A” captioned “Foreign Market Value” and that the export values, as defined in section 402 (d) of the said act were no higher.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to he the proper basis for determination of the value of the merchandise involved, and that such values were as set forth in said schedule “A.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.

> Schedule “A”

> Lang & Marshall Company, Inc. Foreign market value per M

> Reap. No. Coll. No. Entry No. Description sq. feet net pkd

> 263570-A_ 09281 917573/53 11/16 — BB-WG—60 x 30 30 x 60] — $166. 78

> 263567-A_ 09278 903976/53 as above_ 166. 78

> 263571-A_ 09282 917575/53 11/16 — BB-WG—40 x 61_ 166. 78

> WG — 40 x 61_ 161. 15

> BB-WG — 40 x 53_ 158. 84

> WG — 40 x 53_ 153. 48

> BB-WG — 39 x 41._ 158. 84

> WG — 39 x 41_ 153. 48

> BB-WG — 49 x 57— 166. 78

> WG — 49 x 57_ 161. 15

> *704Foreign market value per M sq. feet

> Reap. No. Coll. No. Entry No. Description net pkd.

> 263568-A_ 09279 906905/53 *%*— BB-WG—30>4 x 60^1 36K x 60JÍJ 166. 78

> *48Yi*x 30%_ 158. 84

> 263569-A_ 09280 908030/55 11/16 — BB-WG—60 x 30l 36 x 60/— 166. 78

> 48 x 30_ 158. 84

> % — BB-WG—60 x 30l 60 x 36/-166. 78

> 11/16 — BB-WG—72 x 30_.._ entered unit

> 263566-A_ 09277 883682/53 % — BB-WG—48 x 30. value 158. 84
Before the Second Division,

December 14, 1945

No. 50769.

#### Protests 997788-G, etc., of Eurasia Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats of straw and other materials similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47291. Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the merchandise in question was held dutiable as claimed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ROBERT BRIGHT,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE AND 

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 9 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.