##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q þ
    
    Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2004 OR o
    
    Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the Transition Period
From  to Commission file number 000-30758 Nortel Networks Limited(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Canada
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100Brampton, Ontario, Canada
    
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number including area code (905) 863-0000 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes          No ü Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes ü          No Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as at
January 21, 2005 1,460,978,638 without nominal or par value




---



##### Table of Contents



EXPLANATORY NOTE Nortel Networks Limited previously announced the need to restate its consolidated financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and each of its first three quarterly
periods for 2003. The unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2003 and the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2003, including the applicable notes, contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, have been
restated. A number of Nortel Networks past filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
remain subject to ongoing review by the United States Securities and Exchange Commissions Division
of Corporation Finance. In addition, the Second Restatement involved the restatement of Nortel
Networks consolidated financial statements for 2001 and 2002 and the first, second and third
quarters of 2003. Amendments to Nortel Networks prior filings with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission would be required in order for Nortel Networks to be in full compliance
with Nortel Networks reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. However,
Nortel Networks does not believe that it will be feasible to amend Nortel Networks Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, or 2002 Form 10-K/A and our 2003 Quarterly
Reports due to, among other factors, identified material weaknesses in Nortel Networks internal
control over financial reporting, the significant turnover in Nortel Networks finance personnel,
changes in accounting systems, documentation weaknesses, a likely inability to obtain third party
corroboration in certain cases due to the substantial industry adjustment in recent years and the
passage of time generally. In addition, disclosure in the 2002 Form
10-K/A and 2003 Form 10-Qs would in large part repeat the disclosure contained in our 2003 Annual
Report on Form 10-K and this report and expected to be contained in
our other 2004 Form 10-Qs. Accordingly, Nortel Networks does not plan to amend
our 2002 Form 10-K/A and 2003 Form 10-Qs. Nortel Networks believes that it has included in our
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in this report all information needed for current investor understanding. Ongoing
United States Securities and Exchange Commission review may require Nortel Networks to amend this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Nortel Networks other public filings. For a description of the restatements, see Restatement in note 2 of the unaudited consolidated
financial statements and Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations  Developments in 2004  Nortel Networks Audit Committee Independent Review;
restatements; related matters contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. 2




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
 PAGEITEM 1.
    
    Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
    
    4ITEM 2.
    
    Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
    
    61ITEM 3.
    
    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
    
    123ITEM 4.
    
    Controls and Procedures
    
    123PART II
OTHER INFORMATIONITEM 1.
    
    Legal Proceedings
    
    136ITEM 6.
    
    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
    
    137SIGNATURES
    
    141EX-10.1EX-10-.3EX-10.4EX-10.5EX-10.6EX-10.7EX-31.1EX-31.2EX-32
  All dollar amounts in this document are in United States dollars unless otherwise stated. NORTEL, NORTEL NETWORKS,
NORTEL NETWORKS LOGO, NT, the GLOBEMARK, BAYSTACK, OPTERA and PASSPORT are
trademarks of Nortel Networks. MOODYS is a trademark of Moodys Investor Services, Inc. RCMP is a trademark of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. S&P and STANDARD & POORS are trademarks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Any other company or product
names may be trademarks of their respective companies. 3




---



PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
 PAGEITEM 1.
    
    Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
    
    4ITEM 2.
    
    Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
    
    61ITEM 3.
    
    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
    
    123ITEM 4.
    
    Controls and Procedures
    
    123
  4




---



##### Table of Contents



NORTEL NETWORKS
LIMITED Consolidated Statements of
Operations (unaudited)
 Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003As restated*
    
    
    
    
    
    As restated*Revenues
    
    $
    2,590
    
    
    $
    2,288
    
    
    $
    5,034
    
    
    $
    4,583Cost of revenues
    
    
    1,538
    
    
    
    1,407
    
    
    
    2,910
    
    
    
    2,795Gross profit
    
    
    1,052
    
    
    
    881
    
    
    
    2,124
    
    
    
    1,788Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    538
    
    
    
    439
    
    
    
    1,076
    
    
    
    929Research and development expense
    
    
    489
    
    
    
    501
    
    
    
    955
    
    
    
    978Amortization of acquired technology and other
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    Special charges
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    118(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    (75
    )
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    (75
    )
    
    
    12Operating earnings (loss)
    
    
    99
    
    
    
    (50
    )
    
    
    157
    
    
    
    (249
    )Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    (14
    )
    
    
    57
    
    
    
    74
    
    
    
    152Interest expenseLong-term debt
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    (24
    )
    
    
    (46
    )
    
    
    (49
    )Other
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    (14
    )
    
    
    (13
    )Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
minority interests and equity in net loss of associated companies
    
    
    57
    
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    171
    
    
    
    (159
    )Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    450
    
    
    
    (21
    )
    
    
    173
    
    
    
    (155
    )Minority interests  net of tax
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    (25
    )Equity in net loss of associated companies  net of tax
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (25
    )Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
    
    
    48
    
    
    
    (32
    )
    
    
    164
    
    
    
    (205
    )Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  net of tax
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    125Net earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    (40
    )
    
    
    171
    
    
    
    (80
    )Cumulative effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (12
    )Net earnings (loss)
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    (40
    )
    
    
    171
    
    
    
    (92
    )Dividends on preferred shares
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    17Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
    
    $
    47
    
    
    $
    (49
    )
    
    $
    155
    
    
    $
    (109
    )
 * See note 2 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 5




---



##### Table of Contents



NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED Consolidated Balance
Sheets (unaudited)
 June 30,
    
    
    December 31,(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    2004
    
    
    2003ASSETSCurrent assetsCash and cash equivalents
    
    $
    3,647
    
    
    $
    3,928Restricted cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    52
    
    
    
    63Accounts receivable  net
    
    
    2,582
    
    
    
    2,659Inventories  net
    
    
    1,282
    
    
    
    1,190Income taxes recoverable
    
    
    83
    
    
    
    90Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    407
    
    
    
    369Other current assets
    
    
    329
    
    
    
    314Total current assets
    
    
    8,382
    
    
    
    8,613Investments
    
    
    156
    
    
    
    244Plant and equipment  net
    
    
    1,537
    
    
    
    1,654Goodwill
    
    
    2,121
    
    
    
    2,125Intangible assets  net
    
    
    77
    
    
    
    86Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    3,272
    
    
    
    3,397Other assets
    
    
    307
    
    
    
    337Total assets
    
    $
    15,852
    
    
    $
    16,456LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYCurrent liabilitiesNotes payable
    
    $
    31
    
    
    $
    17Trade and other accounts payable
    
    
    900
    
    
    
    860Payroll and benefit-related liabilities
    
    
    485
    
    
    
    764Contractual liabilities
    
    
    485
    
    
    
    529Restructuring
    
    
    124
    
    
    
    205Other accrued liabilities
    
    
    2,416
    
    
    
    2,467Long-term debt due within one year
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    119Total current liabilities
    
    
    4,462
    
    
    
    4,961Long-term debt
    
    
    2,062
    
    
    
    2,091Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    162
    
    
    
    190Other liabilities
    
    
    2,843
    
    
    
    2,944Total liabilities
    
    
    9,529
    
    
    
    10,186Minority interests in subsidiary companies
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    80Commitments and contingencies (notes 13 and 18)SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYPreferred shares, without par value  Authorized shares: unlimited;Issued and outstanding shares: 30,000,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
    
    
    536
    
    
    
    536Common shares, without par value  Authorized shares: unlimited;Issued and outstanding shares: 1,460,978,638 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
    
    
    1,211
    
    
    
    1,211Additional paid-in capital
    
    
    22,067
    
    
    
    22,031Accumulated deficit
    
    
    (16,911
    )
    
    
    (17,066
    )Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    
    
    (665
    )
    
    
    (522
    )Total shareholders equity
    
    
    6,238
    
    
    
    6,190Total liabilities and shareholders equity
    
    $
    15,852
    
    
    $
    16,456
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 6




---



##### Table of Contents



NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
 Six months ended June 30,(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    2004
    
    
    2003As restated *Cash flows from (used in) operating activitiesNet earnings (loss) from continuing operations
    
    $
    164
    
    
    $
    (205
    )Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) from continuing operations to
net cash from (used in) operating activities, net of effects from acquisitions
and divestitures of businesses:Amortization and depreciation
    
    
    171
    
    
    
    213Non-cash portion of special charges and related asset write downs
    
    
    
    
    
    
    39Equity in net loss of associated companies
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    25Stock option compensation
    
    
    36
    
    
    
    12Deferred income taxes
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    23Other liabilities
    
    
    113
    
    
    
    47(Gain) loss on repurchases of outstanding debt securities
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (4
    )(Gain) loss on sale or write down of investments and businesses
    
    
    (109
    )
    
    
    21Other  net
    
    
    (232
    )
    
    
    (329
    )Change in operating assets and liabilities
    
    
    (353
    )
    
    
    309Net cash from (used) in operating activities
    
    
    (210
    )
    
    
    151Cash flows from (used in) investing activitiesExpenditures for plant and equipment
    
    
    (102
    )
    
    
    (64
    )Proceeds on disposals of plant and equipment
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    21Acquisitions of investments and businesses  net of cash acquired
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    (2
    )Proceeds on sale of investments and businesses
    
    
    132
    
    
    
    8Net cash from (used in) investing activities
    
    
    34
    
    
    
    (37
    )Cash flows from (used in) financing activitiesDividends on preferred shares
    
    
    (16
    )
    
    
    (17
    )Increase (decrease) in notes payable  net
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    (14
    )Proceeds from long-term debt
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Repayments of long-term debt
    
    
    (98
    )
    
    
    (94
    )Repayments of capital leases payable
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (6
    )Net cash from (used in) financing activities of continuing operations
    
    
    (107
    )
    
    
    (131
    )Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    (9
    )
    
    
    78Net cash from (used in) continuing operations
    
    
    (292
    )
    
    
    61Net cash from (used in) discontinued operations
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    324Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    (281
    )
    
    
    385Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  net
    
    
    3,928
    
    
    
    3,742Cash and cash equivalents at end of period  net
    
    $
    3,647
    
    
    $
    4,127
 * See note 2 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements 7




---



##### Table of Contents



NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
(millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated)  1.
    
    Significant accounting policies Basis of presentation  The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Nortel Networks Limited (Nortel
Networks) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (U.S.) (GAAP) and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC) for the preparation of interim financial information. They do
not include all information and notes required by U.S. GAAP in the preparation of annual
consolidated financial statements. The accounting policies used in the preparation of the
unaudited consolidated financial statements are the same as those described in Nortel Networks
audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for the year
ended December 31, 2003, except as described in note 3. Although Nortel Networks is
headquartered in Canada, the unaudited consolidated financial statements are expressed in U.S.
dollars as the greater part of the financial results and net assets of Nortel Networks are
denominated in U.S. dollars.As described in note 2, the unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2003, and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2003, including the applicable notes, were restated.Nortel Networks believes all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the
periods presented have been made and all such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature.
The financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily
indicative of financial results for the full year. The unaudited consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with Nortel Networks Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the SEC (Nortel Networks 2003 Annual Report). Comparative figures  Certain 2003 figures in the unaudited consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation and certain 2003 figures have been restated as
set out in note 2. Recent accounting pronouncements  In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached consensus on Issue No. 03-1,
The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments
(EITF 03-1). EITF 03-1 provides guidance on determining when an investment is considered
impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary and the measurement of an impairment
loss. EITF 03-1 is applicable to marketable debt and equity securities within the scope of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115), and SFAS No. 124, Accounting for
Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations, and equity securities that are not
subject to the scope of SFAS 115 and not accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
In September 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) EITF 03-1-1, Effective Date of Paragraphs 10-20 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments , which delays the
effective date for the measurement and recognition criteria contained in EITF 03-1 until final
application guidance is issued. The delay does not suspend the requirement to recognize
other-than-temporary impairments as required by existing authoritative literature. The adoption
of EITF 03-1 is not expected to have a material impact on Nortel Networks results of operations
and financial position.  2.
    
    Restatement First Restatement  In May 2003, Nortel Networks commenced certain balance sheet reviews at the direction of certain
members of former management that led to a comprehensive review and analysis of its assets and
liabilities (the Comprehensive Review), which resulted in the restatement (effected in
December 2003) of its consolidated financial statements for the years 8




---



##### Table of Contents



ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and for the quarters ended March 31, 2003 and June 30,
2003 (the First Restatement).  The Comprehensive Review purported to (i) identify balance sheet accounts that, as of June 30,
2003, were not supportable and required adjustment; (ii) determine whether such adjustments
related to the third quarter of 2003 or prior periods; and (iii) document certain account
balances in accordance with Nortel Networks accounting policies and procedures. The
Comprehensive Review was supplemented by additional procedures carried out between July 2003 and
November 2003 to quantify the effects of potential adjustments in the relevant periods and
review the appropriateness of releases of certain contractual liability and other related
provisions (also called accruals, reserves or accrued liabilities) in the six fiscal quarters
ending with the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 and formed the basis for the adjustments made
to the financial statements in the First Restatement.On December 23, 2003, Nortel Networks filed with the SEC an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the 2002 Form 10-K/A) and amended Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q/A for the first and second quarters of 2003 (the 2003 Form 10-Q/As) reflecting the
First Restatement. As disclosed in those reports, the net effect of the First Restatement
adjustments was a reduction in accumulated deficit of $486, $171 and $32 as of December 31,
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.Second RestatementIn late October 2003, the Audit Committee of Nortel
Networks and Nortel Networks Corporations (NNC) Boards of Directors (the
Audit Committee) initiated an independent review of the facts and circumstances leading to the
First Restatement (the Independent Review) and engaged the law firm now known as Wilmer Cutler
Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP (WCPHD) to advise it in connection with the Independent Review. The
Audit Committee sought to gain a full understanding of the events that caused significant excess
liabilities to be maintained on the balance sheet that needed to be restated, and to recommend
that the Board adopt, and direct management to implement, necessary remedial measures to address
personnel, controls, compliance and discipline. The Independent Review focused initially on
events relating to the establishment and release of contractual liability and other related
provisions in the second half of 2002 and the first half of 2003, including the involvement of
senior corporate leadership. As the Independent Review evolved, its focus broadened to include
specific provisioning activities in each of the business units and geographic regions. In light
of concerns raised in the initial phase of the Independent Review, the Audit Committee expanded
the review to include provisioning activities in the third and fourth quarters of 2003.As the Independent Review progressed, the Audit Committee directed new corporate management to
examine in depth the concerns identified by WCPHD regarding provisioning activity and to review
provision releases in each of the four quarters of 2003, down to a low threshold. That
examination, and other errors identified by management, led to the restatement of Nortel
Networks consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and
the quarters ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, June 30, 2003 and 2002 and September 30, 2003 and
2002 (the Second Restatement).Over the course of the Second Restatement process, management also identified certain accounting
practices that it determined should be adjusted as part of the Second Restatement. In
particular, management identified certain errors related to revenue recognition and undertook a
process of revenue reviews. In light of the resulting adjustments to revenues previously
reported, the Audit Committee has determined to review the facts and circumstances leading to
the restatement of these revenues for specific transactions identified in the Second
Restatement. This review will have a particular emphasis on the underlying conduct that led to
the initial recognition of these revenues.Other accounting practices that management examined and adjusted as part of the Second
Restatement included, among other things, the following:  
    
    Nortel Networks foreign exchange accounting as part of managements plan to
address an identified material weakness related to foreign currency translation;
    
    intercompany balances that did not eliminate upon consolidation and related provisions;
    
    special charges relating to inventory impairment, contract settlement costs and other charges; and
    
    the accounting treatment of certain elements of discontinued operations.  Due to, among other factors, significant turnover in Nortel Networks finance personnel, changes
in accounting systems, documentation weaknesses and identified material weaknesses in internal
control over financial reporting, the Second Restatement involved hundreds of Nortel Networks
finance personnel and a number of outside consultants and advisors. 9




---



##### Table of Contents



The process required the review and verification of a substantial number of documents and
communications and related accounting entries over multiple fiscal periods. In addition, the
review of accruals and provisions and the application of accounting literature to certain
matters in the Second Restatement, including revenue recognition, foreign exchange, special
charges and discontinued operations, was complicated by the passage of time, lack of
availability of supporting records and the turnover of finance personnel. As a result of this
complexity, estimates and assumptions that impact both the quantum of the various recorded
adjustments and the fiscal period to which they were attributed were required in the
determination of certain of the Second Restatement adjustments. Nortel Networks believes the
procedures followed in determining such estimates were appropriate and reasonable using the best
available information.The following tables present the impact of the Second Restatement adjustments on Nortel Networks
previously reported consolidated statements of operations and a summary of the adjustments from
the Second Restatement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. The Second Restatement
adjustments related primarily to the following items, each of which reflect a number of related
adjustments that have been aggregated for disclosure purposes, and are described in the
paragraphs following the tables below:  
    
    Revenues and cost of revenues;
    
    Foreign exchange;
    
    Intercompany balances;
    
    Special charges;
    
    Other;
    
    Reclassifications; and
    
    Discontinued operations.  Consolidated Statement of Operations Three months ended June 30, 2003
    
    
    Six months ended June 30, 2003As previously
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    As previouslyreported
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    As restated
    
    
    reported
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    As restatedRevenues
    
    $
    2,340
    
    
    $
    (52
    )
    
    $
    2,288
    
    
    $
    4,716
    
    
    $
    (133
    )
    
    $
    4,583Cost of revenues
    
    
    1,317
    
    
    
    90
    
    
    
    1,407
    
    
    
    2,641
    
    
    
    154
    
    
    
    2,795Gross profit
    
    
    1,023
    
    
    
    (142
    )
    
    
    881
    
    
    
    2,075
    
    
    
    (287
    )
    
    
    1,788Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    413
    
    
    
    26
    
    
    
    439
    
    
    
    926
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    929Research and development expense
    
    
    472
    
    
    
    29
    
    
    
    501
    
    
    
    974
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    978Special charges
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (21
    )
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    110
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    118(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    12Operating earnings (loss)
    
    
    143
    
    
    
    (193
    )
    
    
    (50
    )
    
    
    73
    
    
    
    (322
    )
    
    
    (249
    )Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    57
    
    
    
    30
    
    
    
    122
    
    
    
    152Interest expenseLong-term debt
    
    
    (23
    )
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (24
    )
    
    
    (46
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (49
    )Other
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    (9
    )
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    (13
    )Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes, minority interests and equity
in net loss of associated companies
    
    
    143
    
    
    
    (165
    )
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    48
    
    
    
    (207
    )
    
    
    (159
    )Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    4141
    
    
    
    (162
    )
    
    
    (21
    )
    
    
    40
    
    
    
    (195
    )
    
    
    (155
    )Minority interests  net of tax
    
    
    (12
    )
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    (21
    )
    
    
    (25
    )Equity in net loss of associated companies  net of tax
    
    
    (20
    )
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (30
    )
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    (25
    )Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
    
    
    109
    
    
    
    (141
    )
    
    
    (32
    )
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    (211
    )
    
    
    (205
    )Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  net of tax
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    162
    
    
    
    (37
    )
    
    
    125Net earnings (loss) before cumulative effect
of accounting change
    
    
    107
    
    
    
    (147
    )
    
    
    (40
    )
    
    
    168
    
    
    
    (248
    )
    
    
    (80
    )Cumulative effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    (12
    )Net earnings (loss)
    
    
    107
    
    
    
    (147
    )
    
    
    (40
    )
    
    
    160
    
    
    
    (252
    )
    
    
    (92
    )Dividends on preferred shares
    
    
    7

    
    
    2

    
    
    9

    
    
    12

    
    
    5

    
    
    17Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
    
    $
    100
    
    
    $
    (149
    )
    
    $
    (49
    )
    
    $
    148
    
    
    $
    (257
    )
    
    $
    (109
    )
 10




---



##### Table of Contents



Summary of Restatement Adjustments for the three months ended June 30, 2003: Revenues
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Inter-
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Dis-and cost of
    
    
    Foreign
    
    
    company
    
    
    Special
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Reclassifi-
    
    
    continued
    
    
    Totalrevenues
    
    
    exchange
    
    
    balances
    
    
    charges
    
    
    Other
    
    
    cations
    
    
    operations
    
    
    adjustmentsRevenues
    
    $
    (52
    )
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (52
    )Cost of revenues
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (9
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    88
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    90Gross profit
    
    
    (57
    )
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (88
    )
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (142
    )Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    22
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    26Research and development expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    29Special charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (21
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (21
    )(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    17Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    (26
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    32Interest expense  long term debt
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )Interest expense  other
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3
    )Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3Minority interests  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4Equity in net loss of associated
companies  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    17Net earnings (loss) from
discontinued operations  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    (6
    )Cumulative effect of accounting
change  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total restatement adjustments
    
    $
    (57
    )
    
    $
    7
    
    
    $
    (15
    )
    
    $
    21
    
    
    $
    (97
    )
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (6
    )
    
    $
    (147
    )
 11




---



##### Table of Contents



Summary of Restatement Adjustments for the six months ended June 30, 2003: Revenues
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Inter-
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Dis-and cost of
    
    
    Foreign
    
    
    company
    
    
    Special
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Reclassifi-
    
    
    continued
    
    
    Totalrevenues
    
    
    exchange
    
    
    balances
    
    
    charges
    
    
    Other
    
    
    cations
    
    
    operations
    
    
    adjustmentsRevenues
    
    $
    (133
    )
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (133
    )Cost of revenues
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    97
    
    
    
    18
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    154Gross profit
    
    
    (165
    )
    
    
    (9
    )
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (97
    )
    
    
    (18
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (287
    )Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (10
    )
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3Research and development expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4Deferred stock option compensation
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Special charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    8(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    20Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    106
    
    
    
    (25
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    122Interest expense  long term debt
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3
    )Interest expense  other
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (4
    )Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12Minority interests  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (21
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (21
    )Equity in net loss of associated
companies  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5Net earnings (loss) from
discontinued operations  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (37
    )
    
    
    (37
    )Cumulative effect of accounting
change  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (4
    )Total restatement adjustments
    
    $
    (165
    )
    
    $
    97
    
    
    $
    (21
    )
    
    $
    (8
    )
    
    $
    (107
    )
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (48
    )
    
    $
    (252
    )
  The effect of the Second Restatement adjustments on the consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2003 is shown following the discussion below.Revenues and cost of revenuesRevenues and cost of revenues were impacted by various errors related to revenue recognition,
corrections to foreign exchange accounting, intercompany related items and other adjustments,
including financial statement reclassifications. These items are further described below. The
net impact to revenues of the adjustments was a decrease of $52 and $133 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. The net impact to cost of revenues related to these
revenue adjustments, and the other corrections was an increase of $90 and $154 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. The following table summarizes the revenue
recognition adjustments and other adjustments to revenues and cost of revenues, which decreased
gross profit by $142 and $287 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively: 12




---



##### Table of Contents



Three months ended June 30
    
    
    Six months ended June 30Cost of
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Cost ofRevenues
    
    
    revenues
    
    
    Revenues
    
    
    revenuesRevenue recognition adjustments:Application of SAB 101 or SOP 97-2 (a)Title and delivery
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    3
    
    
    $
    35
    
    
    $
    12Undelivered elements and liquidated damages
    
    
    (81
    )
    
    
    (16
    )
    
    
    (98
    )
    
    
    12Application
of SOP 81-1 (b)
    
    
    36
    
    
    
    19
    
    
    
    18
    
    
    
    50Persuasive evidence of an arrangement
    
    
    (13
    )
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    (13
    )
    
    
    (7
    )Other revenue recognition adjustments
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    (75
    )
    
    
    (35
    )Increase (decrease) associated with revenue recognition
    
    
    (52
    )
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    (133
    )
    
    
    32Other adjustments:Foreign exchange
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    9Intercompany
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (9
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2
    )Other
    
    
    
    
    
    
    88
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    97Reclassifications
    
    
    
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    18Increase (decrease) to revenues and cost of revenues
    
    $
    (52
    )
    
    $
    90
    
    
    $
    (133
    )
    
    $
    154
 (a)
    
    Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements
(SAB 101); Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition (SOP
97-2).(b)
    
    SOP 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type
Contracts (SOP 81-1).
  Application of SAB 101 or SOP 97-2Title and deliveryRevenues were recognized on certain sales (primarily prior to 2001) for which it was
subsequently determined that the criteria for revenue recognition under SAB 101 or SOP 97-2, as
applicable, had not been met, including arrangements in which legal title or risk of loss on
products did not transfer to the buyer until full payment was received, and arrangements where
delivery had not occurred. Revenues and related cost of revenues for these agreements should
have been deferred until title or risk of loss had passed and all criteria for revenue
recognition had been met. Therefore, adjustments were made to defer revenues and related cost
of revenues from the periods in which they were originally recorded and to recognize them in the
periods in which all revenue recognition criteria were met.Undelivered elements and liquidated damagesIn certain multiple element arrangements, total arrangement fees were recognized as revenue at
the time of delivery of software or hardware, but prior to the delivery of future contractual or
implicit post-contract support (PCS) or other services. Revenues should have been allocated
to these future deliverables based on their fair value and recognized ratably over the PCS
period or as the future obligations were performed. As well, in certain circumstances where the
criteria to treat delivered software and hardware elements and undelivered PCS services as
separate accounting units were not met, the entire arrangement fee should have been recognized
over the PCS period. Adjustments were made to appropriately allocate revenue among the
accounting units and recognize the allocated revenue in accordance with the applicable revenue
recognition guidance.Revenues were also recognized for certain contracts that involved undelivered elements as a
result of product development delays. The lack of relative fair value for the undelivered
element meant that revenues and cost of revenues for all products delivered should have been
deferred until the undelivered element was delivered. As originally recorded, revenues were
recognized upon delivery of an alternative product and costs were accrued for the undelivered
element. To correct for these items, related cost provisions were reversed and revenues and
associated cost of revenues were recognized in the appropriate periods when all elements had
been delivered.Revenues were recognized on certain contracts with potential liquidated damages arising
primarily from network outages, shipment delays or product development delays on undelivered
elements. Generally, revenues and related cost of revenues should have been deferred up to the
maximum potential liquidated damages until the damages had been incurred or there was no longer
a possibility of incurring such damages. Specific contracts, primarily in the Asia region, had
the potential for liquidated damages plus right of return privileges if such damages exceeded
contractually defined thresholds due to a product development delay (undelivered element).
Revenues for all products delivered should have 13




---



##### Table of Contents



been deferred until the undelivered element was
delivered. After delivery of the undelivered element, and in light of a lack of a reasonable
and reliable history of comparable product returns on which to base a returns allowance,
revenues should have been deferred until the right of return had lapsed or until expected
returns could be reasonably estimated. After the right of return had lapsed or reasonable
estimates of expected returns could be made, revenues should have continued to be deferred up to
the amount of the maximum potential liquidated damages until either the earlier of when the
damages were incurred, or there was no longer the possibility of incurring any damages. As
originally recorded, cost provisions were recorded for the amount of the estimated damages
and/or cost of product replacement. To correct these items, related cost provisions were
reversed and revenues and associated cost of revenues were recognized in the appropriate
periods.Application of SOP 81-1Adjustments were required to the application of percentage-of-completion accounting for certain
long-term construction contracts. In the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region,
revenues and costs of revenues were not recognized using an appropriate measure of progress
towards completion. An input method should have been used based on actual costs incurred and
known/projected margin estimates at the time. This error was corrected, as well as other
application errors that were identified across all regions.Persuasive evidence of an arrangementFor a specific transaction in the Asia Pacific region, revenues were recognized after a notice
of award was received but before a contract was executed. Revenues should have been deferred
until a contract was executed. To correct for this item, revenues and related cost of revenues
were deferred until contract execution occurred.Other revenue recognition adjustmentsOther adjustments primarily included corrections related to
an overstatement of revenues and cost of
revenues as a result of two specific transactions recorded in the first quarter of 2003
which should have been recorded in 2002. In addition, other revenue
recognition adjustments were made which related to
a specific contract in the Caribbean and Latin American (CALA) region, other errors related to
non-cash incentives and concessions provided to customers and other calculation errors.Foreign exchangeAs part of the plan to address a material weakness reported in Nortel Networks Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, a review of foreign exchange accounting
was undertaken. The net impact was a decrease to
pre-tax loss of $7 and $97 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. The
following presents the impact of these restatement adjustments on the consolidated statements of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, which are described below: Three
    
    
    Sixmonths
    
    
    monthsended
    
    
    endedJune 30,
    
    
    June 30,2003
    
    
    2003Gross profitOther errors
    
    $
    2
    
    
    $
    (9
    )Total increase (decrease) to gross profit
    
    $
    2
    
    
    $
    (9
    )Other incomeFunctional currency designation
    
    $
    24
    
    
    $
    86Intercompany transaction designation
    
    
    (38
    )
    
    
    (57
    )Revaluation errors related to discontinued operations
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    38Other errors
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    39Total increase to other income
    
    $
    5
    
    
    $
    106Total decrease to pre-tax loss
    
    $
    7
    
    
    $
    97
  Functional currency designation 14




---



##### Table of Contents



The determination of the functional currency for certain entities was re-examined, based on the
guidance under SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation (SFAS 52). As a result, Nortel
Networks identified four instances in which the functional currency designation of an entity was
incorrect. These revisions resulted in increases to other income (expense)  net.Intercompany transaction designationNortel Networks identified two instances of incorrect treatment of significant foreign currency
translation gains and losses arising from intercompany positions. Under SFAS 52, intercompany
foreign currency transactions that were long-term in nature should have been recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive loss on the balance sheet when translated rather than recorded
as a transactional gain or loss in the statement of operations. The net impact of the
adjustments was an increase or decrease to other income (expense)  net, with an offset to
accumulated other comprehensive loss.Revaluation errors related to discontinued operationsErrors were identified in the revaluation of certain foreign denominated customer financing
provisions within discontinued operations, the correction of which increased other income and
decreased net earnings from discontinued operations.Other errorsOther errors identified were related to translation of foreign denominated intercompany
transactions, revaluation of certain foreign denominated intercompany transactions and
accounting for mark-to-market adjustments for foreign exchange contracts as required under SFAS
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133).Intercompany balancesHistorically, Nortel Networks had certain intercompany balances that did not eliminate upon
consolidation (out-of-balance positions), and provisions had been recorded accordingly. As
part of the Second Restatement, Nortel Networks reviewed these provisions and determined that
they should not have been recorded. Adjustments were recorded in the appropriate periods to
reverse these provisions and to correct the significant out-of-balance positions. The
adjustments to reverse the provisions affected the second quarter of 2003 and periods prior to
2000. The net impact was an increase of $15 and $21 to
pre-tax loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.Special chargesAs part of the Second Restatement, the components of special charges were re-examined and the
impact to special charges was a decrease of $21 and an increase of $8 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. Adjustments for restructuring were recorded to
special charges related to contract settlement costs, including real estate related items,
severance and fringe benefit related costs and plant and equipment impairment costs. Nortel
Networks determined that these items were either recorded in special charges in error or,
although correctly recorded when originally recognized, were not adjusted in the appropriate
subsequent periods for changes in estimates and/or
assumptions. The following presents the impact of these other adjustments on special charges
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003: Three
    
    
    Sixmonths
    
    
    monthsended
    
    
    endedJune 30,
    
    
    June 30,2003
    
    
    2003Contract settlement costs
    
    $
    (26
    )
    
    $
    (29
    )Plant and equipment impairment costs
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    32Severance and fringe benefit related costs
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    5Total increase (decrease) to special charges
    
    $
    (21
    )
    
    $
    8
 15




---



##### Table of Contents



OtherOther adjustments were primarily to correct certain accruals, provisions or other transactions
which were either initially recorded incorrectly in prior periods, or not properly released or
adjusted for changes in estimates and/or assumptions in the appropriate subsequent periods. The
components of these adjustments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, are described
below. Three
    
    
    Sixmonths
    
    
    monthsended
    
    
    endedJune 30,
    
    
    June 30,2003
    
    
    2003Other adjustmentsCost of revenues
    
    $
    (88
    )
    
    $
    (97
    )Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    10Research and development expense
    
    
    (32
    )
    
    
    (12
    )(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    (7
    )Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    15Interest expense
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    (8
    )Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    12Minority interests  net of tax
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (21
    )Equity in net loss of associated companies  net of tax
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    5Cumulative effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (4
    )Net decrease to net earnings
    
    $
    (97
    )
    
    $
    (107
    )
  Cost of revenuesFor the three months ended June 30, 2003, the increase to cost of revenues of $88 was comprised
primarily of an increase of approximately $28 for customer and contract related accruals,
approximately $22 for warranty costs, approximately $19 to reflect an adjustment to the timing of employee bonus related accruals, including as a result of the applicable performance metrics for the bonus awards not having been met in the period
in which the bonuses were originally awarded as a result of the Second Restatement, approximately $13 for inventory and product related accruals,
and approximately $6 related to other accruals.For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the increase to cost of revenues of $97 was comprised
primarily of an increase of approximately $39 for customer and contract related accruals,
approximately $33 for warranty costs, $15 for inventory and product related accruals, and
approximately $10 related to other accruals.Selling, general and administrative expenseFor the three months ended June 30, 2003, the increase of $22 to selling, general and
administrative expense was comprised primarily of increases of approximately $30 related to
contract amendments and settlements with certain service providers, increases of
approximately $16 to other accruals and an increase of $3 to reflect
net adjustments to the timing of employee bonus related accruals, partially offset by approximately $24 related to bad debt
expense.For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the decrease of $10 to selling, general and
administrative expense was comprised primarily of reductions of approximately $48 related to bad
debt expense and approximately $42 to reflect net adjustments to the timing of employee bonus related accruals,
partially offset by approximately $42 related to contract amendments and settlements with
certain service providers and increases of approximately $38 to other accruals.Research and development expenseFor the three months ended June 30, 2003, the increase of $32 in research and development
expense was primarily the result of an increase of approximately $26 to reflect an adjustment to the timing of employee bonus related accruals, including as a result of the applicable performance metrics for the bonus awards not having been met in the period
in which the bonuses were originally awarded as a result of the Second Restatement and increases of approximately $21 to accruals related
to various research and development projects and other accruals, partially offset by
approximately $15 to correctly treat certain software repair costs as warranty costs.For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the increase of $12 in research and development expense
was primarily the result of approximately $40 to accruals related to various research and
development projects and other accruals, partially offset by approximately $28 to correctly
treat certain software repair costs as warranty costs. 16




---



##### Table of Contents



Other income (expense)  netFor the three months ended June 30, 2003, the increase of $32 in other income was primarily the
result of adjustments of approximately $9 related to sales and use
tax provisions, and approximately $23 related to other accruals.For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the increase of $15 in other income was primarily the
result of an increase of approximately $17 from corrections to the timing of the recognition of
the impairment of certain investments, approximately $16 for unused customer credits originally
recognized as a reduction to customer revenues in this period and approximately $19 related to
other accruals, partially offset by a decrease of approximately $22 related to sales and use tax
accruals and adjustments of approximately $15 related to sales of receivables and customer
financing.Interest expenseFor the three months ended June 30, 2003, the increase to interest expense of $4 was primarily
related to long-term debt for corrections to accounting for certain sale-leaseback transactions.For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the increase to interest expense of $8 was primarily the
result of a $9 increase related to long-term debt for corrections to accounting for certain
sale-leaseback transactions, partially offset by a $2 decrease from adjustments to the timing of
the recognition of costs associated with sales of receivables and customer financing.Income taxes, minority interests and equity in net loss of associated companies  net of taxIncome tax benefit and minority interests were also adjusted as part of the Second Restatement.
The adjustment to income tax benefit was an increase of $3 and $12 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2003, respectively primarily related to investment tax credits and taxes
attributable to preferred share dividends. The adjustment to minority interests as a result of
the Second Restatement adjustments was a decrease of $4 and an increase of $21 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.As part of the Second Restatement, equity in net loss of associated companies  net of tax was
adjusted to reflect the final reported losses of the associated companies for the period rather
than the estimates that were used when originally recorded. The adjustment resulted in a
decrease to net loss of $17 and $5 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003,
respectively.ReclassificationsAs a result of the restatement process, various presentation inconsistencies were identified.
Adjustments were made to appropriately reflect certain items in the consolidated statements of
operations. The reclassifications were made for royalty expense, (gain) loss on sale of
businesses and assets, and other items including certain functional spending and specific
expenses. The amounts that were reclassified for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003
are detailed below: 17




---



##### Table of Contents



Royalty
    
    
    Disposalexpense
    
    
    of assets
    
    
    Other
    
    
    TotalThree months ended June 30, 2003Cost of revenues
    
    $
    11
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (3
    )
    
    $
    8Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    3(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    10Other expense
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    (10
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (21
    )Net impact of reclassifications
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Six months ended June 30, 2003Cost of revenues
    
    $
    24
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (6
    )
    
    $
    18Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    11Research and development expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    (5
    )(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    13Other expense
    
    
    (24
    )
    
    
    (13
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (37
    )Net impact of reclassifications
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
  Discontinued operationsAs a result of the restatement process, the initial provision for loss on disposal of the access
solutions discontinued operations recorded in June 2001, and the subsequent activity during 2001
through 2004 were re-examined. Nortel Networks concluded that the net loss on disposal of
operations recognized in the second quarter of 2001 was overstated. In addition, other
adjustments were necessary to correct certain items that were either initially recorded
incorrectly, or not properly released or adjusted for changes in estimates in the appropriate
periods subsequent to the second quarter of 2001. The net impact of the adjustments was a $6
(net of tax of $1) increase to the previously reported net loss from discontinued operations for
the three months ended June 30, 2003 and a $37 (net of tax of $1) decrease to the previously
reported net earnings from discontinued operations  net of tax for the six months ended June
30, 2003.For the three months ended June 30, 2003, the $6 increase to net loss from discontinued
operations consisted primarily of increases of approximately $12 resulting from additional
provisions related to discontinued operations and approximately $9 related to the revaluation of
certain foreign denominated customer financing provisions, partially offset by a $17 net
decrease from adjustments to contingent liabilities.For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the $37 decrease to net earnings from discontinued
operations consisted primarily of a decrease of approximately $90 resulting from the elimination
of a gain on redemption of an investment interest due to the reversal in an earlier period of a
full valuation allowance that had been recorded against the investment interest when acquired, a
decrease of approximately $39 related to the revaluation of certain foreign denominated customer
financing provisions and a decrease of approximately $12 resulting from additional provisions related to
discontinued operations, partially offset by an increase of $37 for corrections to accrued
liabilities, a $50 net increase from adjustments to contingent liabilities and an increase of approximately $11
related to a gain on settlement of a sales representation agreement which had previously been
recorded in continuing operations.Balance sheetThe following table presents the impact of the Second Restatement adjustments on Nortel Networks
previously reported consolidated balance sheet as of June 30,
2003. The impact on inventories  net and various liabilities, including deferred revenue, was primarily due to the adjustments to
revenues and cost of revenues described above. The adjustments to plant and equipment  net and
long-term debt primarily related to corrections to the accounting for certain sale-leaseback
transactions. In addition, there were reclassifications resulting from the restatement
adjustments and to conform to the 2003 presentation in the consolidated balance sheet. 18




---



##### Table of Contents



Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2003 As previouslyreported
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    As restatedASSETSCurrent assetsCash and cash equivalents
    
    $
    4,115
    
    
    $
    12
    
    
    $
    4,127Restricted cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    115
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    115Accounts receivable  net
    
    
    2,008
    
    
    
    (32
    )
    
    
    1,976Inventories  net
    
    
    879
    
    
    
    559
    
    
    
    1,438Income taxes recoverable
    
    
    57
    
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    111Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    399
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    399Other current assets
    
    
    428
    
    
    
    (26
    )
    
    
    402Total current assets
    
    
    8,001
    
    
    
    567
    
    
    
    8,568Investments
    
    
    199
    
    
    
    82
    
    
    
    281Plant and equipment  net
    
    
    1,378
    
    
    
    246
    
    
    
    1,624Goodwill
    
    
    2,022
    
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    2,020Intangible assets  net
    
    
    47
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    47Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    3,418
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    3,439Other assets
    
    
    601
    
    
    
    (128
    )
    
    
    473Total assets
    
    $
    15,666
    
    
    $
    786
    
    
    $
    16,452LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYCurrent liabilitiesNotes payable
    
    $
    48
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    48Trade and other accounts payable
    
    
    798
    
    
    
    (93
    )
    
    
    705Payroll and benefit-related liabilities
    
    
    627
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    632Contractual liabilities
    
    
    1,007
    
    
    
    (227
    )
    
    
    780Restructuring
    
    
    296
    
    
    
    (72
    )
    
    
    224Other accrued liabilities
    
    
    2,463
    
    
    
    461
    
    
    
    2,924Long-term debt due within one year
    
    
    184
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    195Total current liabilities
    
    
    5,423
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    5,508Long-term debt
    
    
    1,900
    
    
    
    214
    
    
    
    2,114Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    458
    
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    441Other liabilities
    
    
    2,426
    
    
    
    415
    
    
    
    2,841Total liabilities
    
    
    10,207
    
    
    
    697
    
    
    
    10,904Minority interests in subsidiary companies
    
    
    125
    
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    108SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYPreferred shares
    
    
    536
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    536Common shares
    
    
    1,211
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,211Additional paid-in capital
    
    
    22,017
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    22,017Accumulated deficit
    
    
    (17,459
    )
    
    
    (283
    )
    
    
    (17,742
    )Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    
    
    (971
    )
    
    
    389
    
    
    
    (582
    )Total shareholders equity
    
    
    5,334
    
    
    
    106
    
    
    
    5,440Total liabilities and shareholders equity
    
    $
    15,666
    
    
    $
    786
    
    
    $
    16,452
 19




---



##### Table of Contents



3.
    
    Accounting changes  (a)
    
    Stock-based compensation  Effective January 1, 2003, Nortel Networks elected to expense employee stock-based
compensation using the fair value based method prospectively for all awards granted or
modified on or after January 1, 2003 in accordance with SFAS No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation  Transition and Disclosure  an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
123. Prior to January 1, 2003, Nortel Networks, as permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, applied the intrinsic value method under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related
interpretations, in accounting for its employee stock-based compensation plans. The fair
value at grant date of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight line basis over the vesting period
of the award.Had Nortel Networks applied the fair value based method to all stock-based awards in all
periods, reported net earnings (loss) and earnings (loss) per common share would have been
adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below for each of the three and six months ended
June 30: Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares  reported
    
    $
    47
    
    
    $
    (49
    )
    
    $
    155
    
    
    $
    (109
    )Stock-based compensation  reported(a)
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    78
    
    
    
    16Stock-based compensation  pro forma (b)
    
    
    (35
    )
    
    
    (79
    )
    
    
    (108
    )
    
    
    (192
    )Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares  pro forma
    
    $
    32
    
    
    $
    (118
    )
    
    $
    125
    
    
    $
    (285
    )
 (a)
    
    Stock-based compensation  reported, included:
 i.
    
    Stock option expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 of
$21 and $36, respectively, which was net of tax of nil in each period. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2003, the amounts were $8 and $12, respectively,
which was net of tax of nil in each period;ii.
    
    Employer portion of stock purchase plan contributions expense for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2004 of nil. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2003, the amounts were $2 and $3, respectively, which was net of tax of nil
in each period;iii.
    
    Restricted stock units expense for the three and six months ended June
30, 2004 of nil and $41, respectively, which was net of tax of nil in each period.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, the amounts were nil; andiv.
    
    Deferred stock units expense for the three and six months ended June 30,
2004 of $ (1) and $1, respectively, which was net of tax of nil in each period. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, the amounts were nil and $1,
respectively, which was net of tax of nil in each period.
 (b)
    
    Stock-based compensation  pro forma was net of tax of nil in each period.
  The following weighted-average assumptions were used in computing the fair value of
stock options for each of the three months and six months ended June 30: Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,2004(a)
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Black-Scholes weighted-average assumptionsExpected dividend yield
    
    
    
    
    
    
    0.00
    %
    
    
    0.00
    %
    
    
    0.00
    %Expected volatility
    
    
    
    
    
    
    92.86
    %
    
    
    94.47
    %
    
    
    92.48
    %Risk-free interest rate
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2.48
    %
    
    
    2.96
    %
    
    
    2.81
    %Expected option life in years
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    4Weighted-average stock option fair value
per option granted
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    1.91
    
    
    $
    5.21
    
    
    $
    1.57
 (a)
    
    For the three months ended June 30, 2004, no stock options were granted.
  (b)
    
    Asset retirement obligations  In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations (SFAS 143), which applies to certain obligations associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets. SFAS 143 requires
that a liability be initially recognized for the estimated fair value of the obligation when
it is incurred. The 20




---



##### Table of Contents



associated asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the carrying
amount of the long-lived asset and depreciated over the remaining life of the underlying
asset and the associated liability is accreted to the estimated fair value of the obligation
at the settlement date through periodic accretion charges to net earnings (loss). When the
obligation is settled, any difference between the final cost and the recorded amount is
recognized as income or loss on settlement. Effective January 1, 2003, Nortel Networks
adopted the initial recognition and measurement provisions of SFAS 143 and identified
certain asset retirement obligations to remediate leased premises and buildings and
equipment situated on leased land. The adoption of SFAS 143 resulted in an increase to net
loss of $12 (net of tax of nil) which has been reported as a cumulative effect of accounting
change  net of tax, an increase in plant and equipment  net of $4 and an asset retirement
obligation liability of $16 as of January 1, 2003. The adoption of SFAS 143 did not have a
material impact on depreciation and accretion expense or basic and diluted earnings (loss)
per share.  (c)
    
    Employee benefits plans  On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act
of 2003 (the MPDIM Act) was signed into law in the U.S. The MPDIM Act introduced a
prescription drug benefit under Medicare (specifically, Medicare Part D) as well as a
federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that
is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. As permitted by FSP Financial
Accounting Standard (FAS) 106-1, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, Nortel Networks
chose to make the one-time deferral election which remained in effect for its plans in the
U.S. until the earlier of the issuance of specific authoritative guidance by the FASB on how
to account for the federal subsidy to be provided to plan sponsors under the MPDIM Act or
the remeasurement of plan assets and obligations subsequent to January 31, 2004. On May 19,
2004, FSP FAS 106-2, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (FSP FAS 106-2) was issued
by the FASB to provide guidance relating to the prescription drug subsidy provided by the
MPDIM Act. Nortel Networks expects to have portions of its post-retirement benefit plans
qualify as actuarially equivalent to the benefit provided under the MPDIM Act, for which it
expects to receive federal subsidies. Nortel Networks expects that other portions of the
plans will not be actuarially equivalent. Nortel Networks adopted FSP FAS 106-2 for the
three months ended June 30, 2004. The financial impact of the federal subsidies was
determined by remeasuring Nortel Networks retiree life and medical obligation as of January
1, 2004, as provided under the retroactive application provision of FSP FAS 106-2. As a
result of adoption, the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation decreased by $31.
Net periodic post-retirement benefit costs are expected to decrease by $1 for the remainder
of 2004 as a result of the subsidy.  (d)
    
    Accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities
and equity  In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS 150). SFAS 150
clarifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of both
liabilities and equity, including mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests, and
requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities on the balance sheets.
Previously, many of those financial instruments were classified as equity. SFAS 150 is
effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and
otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15,
2003. In November 2003, the FASB issued FSP FAS 150-3, Effective Date, Disclosures, and
Transition for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities
and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests under FASB Statement No.150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and
Equity (FSP FAS 150-3), which deferred indefinitely the effective date for applying the
specific provisions within SFAS 150 related to the classification and measurement of
mandatorily redeemable non-controlling interests. The adoption of SFAS 150, as amended by
FSP FAS 150-3, did not have a material impact on Nortel Networks results of operations and
financial condition.As of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, Nortel Networks continued to consolidate two
enterprises with limited lives. Upon liquidation in 2024, the net assets of these entities
will be distributed to the owners based on their relative interests at that time. The
minority interest included in the consolidated balance sheet related to these entities as of
June 30, 2004 was $48. Nortel Networks has not yet determined the fair value of this
minority interest as of June 30, 2004.  4.
    
    Consolidated financial statement details 21




---



##### Table of Contents



The following consolidated financial statement details are presented as of June
30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 for the consolidated balance sheets and for each of the six
months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 for the consolidated statements of cash flows. Consolidated balance sheets  Accounts receivable  net: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Trade receivables
    
    $
    2,132
    
    
    $
    2,271Contracts in process
    
    
    625
    
    
    
    5822,757
    
    
    
    2,853Less: provision for doubtful accounts
    
    
    (175
    )
    
    
    (194
    )Accounts receivable  net
    
    $
    2,582
    
    
    $
    2,659
  Inventories  net: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Raw materials
    
    $
    183
    
    
    $
    249Work in process
    
    
    278
    
    
    
    221Finished goods
    
    
    821
    
    
    
    720Inventories  net (a)
    
    $
    1,282
    
    
    $
    1,190
 (a)
    
    Net of inventory provisions of $997 and $1,226 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31,
2003, respectively. Other reserves for claims related to contract manufacturers and
suppliers of $78 and $120 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, were
included in other accrued liabilities. These accruals were related to cancellation
charges, contracted-for inventory in excess of future demand and the settlement of certain
other claims.
  Other current assets: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Prepaid expenses
    
    $
    225
    
    
    $
    176Current assets of discontinued operations (a)
    
    
    24
    
    
    
    28Other
    
    
    80
    
    
    
    110Other current assets
    
    $
    329
    
    
    $
    314
 (a)
    
    See note 17 for additional information.
 22




---



##### Table of Contents



Plant and equipment  net: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Cost:Land
    
    $
    59
    
    
    $
    63Buildings
    
    
    1,420
    
    
    
    1,483Machinery and equipment
    
    
    2,544
    
    
    
    2,7054,023
    
    
    
    4,251Less accumulated depreciation:Buildings
    
    
    (451
    )
    
    
    (457
    )Machinery and equipment
    
    
    (2,035
    )
    
    
    (2,140
    )(2,486
    )
    
    
    (2,597
    )Plant and equipment  net (a) (b) (c)
    
    $
    1,537
    
    
    $
    1,654
 (a)
    
    Included assets held for sale with a carrying value of $25 and $30 as of June 30, 2004
and December 31, 2003, respectively, related to owned facilities that were being actively
marketed. These assets were written down in previous periods to their estimated fair
values less costs to sell. The write downs were included in special charges. Nortel
Networks expects to dispose of all of these facilities by mid-2005.(b)
    
    Included variable interest entity assets consolidated prospectively, as required by
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised 2003), Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities  an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (FIN 46R), of $91 and $183 as
of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.(c)
    
    Included embedded leases recorded prospectively, as required by EITF 01-8, Determining
Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease, of $2 and $2 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31,
2003, respectively.
  Goodwill:The following table outlines goodwill by reportable segment: Wireless
    
    
    Enterprise
    
    
    Wireline
    
    
    OpticalNetworks
    
    
    Networks
    
    
    Networks
    
    
    Networks
    
    
    TotalBalance  net as of December 31, 2003
    
    $
    35
    
    
    $
    1,555
    
    
    $
    526
    
    
    $
    9
    
    
    $
    2,125Change:Foreign exchange
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (4
    )Balance  net as of June 30, 2004
    
    $
    35
    
    
    $
    1,553
    
    
    $
    524
    
    
    $
    9
    
    
    $
    2,121
  Intangible assets  net: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Other intangible assets (a)
    
    $
    38
    
    
    $
    45Pension intangible assets (b)
    
    
    39
    
    
    
    41Intangible assets  net
    
    $
    77
    
    
    $
    86
 (a)
    
    Other intangible assets are being amortized over a ten year period ending in 2013. The
amortization expense is denominated in a foreign currency and may fluctuate due to changes
in foreign exchange rates. Other intangible assets are amortized over their expected
pattern of benefit to future periods using estimates of undiscounted cash flows.(b)
    
    Pension intangible assets were recorded as required by SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions. Amounts are not amortized but are adjusted as
part of the annual minimum pension liability assessment.
 23




---



##### Table of Contents



Other accrued liabilities: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Outsourcing and selling, general and administrative related
    
    $
    287
    
    
    $
    298Customer deposits
    
    
    45
    
    
    
    73Product related
    
    
    78
    
    
    
    120Warranty
    
    
    327
    
    
    
    382Deferred income
    
    
    927
    
    
    
    761Miscellaneous taxes
    
    
    34
    
    
    
    75Income taxes payable
    
    
    95
    
    
    
    110Current liabilities of discontinued operations
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    6Interest payable
    
    
    36
    
    
    
    37Advance billings in excess of revenues recognized as long-term contracts
    
    
    493
    
    
    
    509Other
    
    
    90
    
    
    
    96Other accrued liabilities
    
    $
    2,416
    
    
    $
    2,467
  Other liabilities: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Pension, post-employment and post-retirement benefits liability
    
    $
    2,036
    
    
    $
    1,973Long-term provisions
    
    
    807
    
    
    
    971Other liabilities
    
    $
    2,843
    
    
    $
    2,944
  Consolidated statements of cash flows  Change in operating assets and liabilities: June 30,
    
    
    June 30,2004
    
    
    2003Restricted cash and cash equivalents
    
    $
    10
    
    
    $
    144Accounts receivable
    
    
    60
    
    
    
    300Inventories
    
    
    (90
    )
    
    
    145Income taxes
    
    
    (36
    )
    
    
    (7
    )Restructuring
    
    
    (139
    )
    
    
    (342
    )Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    
    
    (406
    )
    
    
    (321
    )Other operating assets and liabilities
    
    
    248
    
    
    
    390Change in operating assets and liabilities
    
    $
    (353
    )
    
    $
    309
  Interest and taxes paid: June 30,
    
    
    June 30,2004
    
    
    2003Cash interest paid
    
    $
    53
    
    
    $
    55Cash taxes paid  net
    
    $
    21
    
    
    $
    8
 24




---



##### Table of Contents



5.
    
    Segment information General description  During 2003 and up to September 30, 2004, Nortel Networks operations were organized around
four reportable segments consisting of Wireless Networks, Enterprise Networks, Wireline Networks
and Optical Networks. Wireless Networks included network access and core networking products for
voice and data communications that span second and third generation wireless technologies and
most major global standards for mobile networks and related professional services. Enterprise
Networks included circuit and packet voice solutions, data networking and security solutions and
the related professional services used by enterprise customers. Wireline Networks included
circuit and packet voice solutions, data networking and security solutions and the related
professional services used by service provider customers. Optical Networks included
metropolitan, regional and long-haul optical transport and switching solutions and managed
broadband services and related professional services for both service provider and enterprise
customers.Other represented miscellaneous business activities and corporate functions. None of these
activities meet the quantitative criteria to be disclosed as reportable segments. As described
in note 17, Nortel Networks access solutions operations were discontinued during the year ended
December 31, 2001. These operations were previously included as a separate business activity
within other. The data below excludes amounts related to the access solutions operations.Effective October 1, 2004, a new streamlined organizational structure was established that
involved, among other things, combining the businesses of Nortel Networks four segments into two
business organizations: (i) Carrier Networks and Global Operations, and (ii) Enterprise
Networks. Nortel Networks is reviewing the impact of these changes on its reportable segments.Nortel Networks president and chief executive officer (the CEO) has been identified as the
chief operating decision maker in assessing the performance of the segments and the allocation
of resources to the segments. Each reportable segment is managed separately with each segment
manager reporting directly to the CEO. The CEO relies on the information derived directly from
the Nortel Networks management reporting system. In April 2004, Nortel Networks and NNCs
boards of directors appointed a new CEO. Commencing in the second quarter of 2004, the primary
financial measure used by the CEO in assessing performance and allocating resources to the
segments is management earnings (loss) before income taxes (Management EBT), a measure that
includes the cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expense, research and
development (R&D) expense, interest expense, other income (expense)  net, minority interests
  net of tax and equity in net loss of associated companies  net of tax. This primary
financial measure replaced contribution margin, the previously disclosed primary financial
measure used for earlier periods. Contribution margin differs from Management EBT in that it
excludes R&D expense, interest expense, other income (expense)  net, minority interest  net of
tax and equity in net loss of associated companies  net of tax.Costs associated with shared services and other corporate costs are allocated to the segments
based on usage determined generally by headcount. Costs not allocated to the segments are
primarily related to Nortel Networks corporate compliance and other non-operational activities
and are included in other. In addition, the CEO does not review asset information on a
segmented basis in order to assess performance and allocate resources. The accounting policies
of the reportable segments are the same as those applied to the consolidated financial
statements. 25




---



##### Table of Contents



Segments  The following tables set forth information by segment for each of the three and six months
ended June 30: Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003RevenuesWireless Networks
    
    $
    1,281
    
    
    $
    973
    
    
    $
    2,506
    
    
    $
    1,842Enterprise Networks
    
    
    578
    
    
    
    520
    
    
    
    1,112
    
    
    
    1,105Wireline Networks
    
    
    444
    
    
    
    495
    
    
    
    883
    
    
    
    1,010Optical Networks
    
    
    280
    
    
    
    288
    
    
    
    525
    
    
    
    605Other
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    21Total
    
    $
    2,590
    
    
    $
    2,288
    
    
    $
    5,034
    
    
    $
    4,583Management EBTWireless Networks
    
    $
    168
    
    
    $
    112
    
    
    $
    389
    
    
    $
    162Enterprise Networks
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    56
    
    
    
    35Wireline Networks
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    56
    
    
    
    (16
    )
    
    
    94Optical Networks
    
    
    (34
    )
    
    
    (107
    )
    
    
    (87
    )
    
    
    (159
    )Other
    
    
    (173
    )
    
    
    (92
    )
    
    
    (244
    )
    
    
    (211
    )Total
    
    $
    (19
    )
    
    $
    (42
    )
    
    $
    98
    
    
    $
    (79
    )Amortization of acquired technology and other
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    Special charges
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    22
    
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    (118
    )Gain (loss) on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    75
    
    
    
    (13
    )
    
    
    75
    
    
    
    (12
    )Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    4Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
    
    $
    48
    
    
    $
    (32
    )
    
    $
    164
    
    
    $
    (205
    )
 26




---



##### Table of Contents



6.
    
    Special charges  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, Nortel Networks continued to implement
its restructuring work plans initiated in 2001 and 2003. Special charges recorded from January
1, 2004 to June 30, 2004 were as follows: ContractsettlementWorkforce
    
    
    and leasereduction
    
    
    costs
    
    
    TotalProvision balance as of December 31, 2003(a)
    
    $
    64
    
    
    $
    455
    
    
    $
    519Special charges:For the three months ended March 31, 2004
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6For the three months ended June 30, 2004
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Revisions to prior accruals:For the three months ended March 31, 2004
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    1For the three months ended June 30, 2004
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (1
    )Cumulative provision (drawdowns) adjustments in 2004:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Cash drawdowns
    
    
    (39
    )
    
    
    (100
    )
    
    
    (139
    )Non-cash drawdowns
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Foreign exchange and other adjustments
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    6Provision balance as of June 30, 2004 (a)
    
    $
    31
    
    
    $
    361
    
    
    $
    392
 (a)
    
    As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the short-term provision balance was $124
and $205, respectively, and the long-term provision balance was $268 and $314,
respectively, which was included in long-term provisions, as a component of other
liabilities.
  Regular full-time (RFT) employee notifications included in special charges were as
follows: Employees (approximate)Direct(a)
    
    
    Indirect(b)
    
    
    TotalRFT employee notifications for the three months ended:March 31, 2004
    
    
    40
    
    
    
    40
    
    
    
    80June 30, 2004
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 (a)
    
    Direct employees included employees performing manufacturing, assembly, test and
inspection activities associated with the production of Nortel Networks products.(b)
    
    Indirect employees included employees performing manufacturing, management, sales,
marketing, research and development and administrative activities.
  Three and six months ended June 30, 2004During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, Nortel Networks recorded special
charges of $(1) and $6, respectively, which included revisions of $(1) and nil, respectively,
related to prior accruals.Workforce reduction charges of $6 were related to severance and benefit costs associated with
approximately 80 employees notified of termination during the three months ended March 31, 2004,
which related entirely to Optical Networks. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the
workforce reduction provision balance was drawn down by cash payments of $39. The remaining
provision is expected to be substantially drawn down by the end of 2004.No new contract settlement and lease costs were incurred during the period. Net revisions to
prior accruals for contract settlement and lease costs of nil were identified for the six months
ended June 30, 2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the provision balance for
contract settlement and lease costs was drawn down by cash payments of $100. The remaining
provision, net of approximately $307 in estimated sublease income, is expected to be
substantially drawn down by the end of 2013.In 2003, Nortel Networks initiated activities to exit certain leased facilities and leases for
assets no longer used, across all segments. The costs associated with these planned activities
have been valued using the estimated fair value method prescribed under SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS 146). The 27




---



##### Table of Contents



table
below summarizes the total costs estimated to be incurred as a result of these activities, which
have met the criteria described in SFAS 146, the balance of these accrued expenses as of June
30, 2004 and the movement in the accrual for the six months ended June 30, 2004. These costs
are included in the provision balance above as of June 30, 2004. Costs
    
    
    Payments
    
    
    AdjustmentsAccrued
    
    
    incurred
    
    
    made
    
    
    madebalance as
    
    
    during the
    
    
    during the
    
    
    during the
    
    
    Accruedof December 31,
    
    
    six months ended
    
    
    six months ended
    
    
    six months ended
    
    
    balance as at2003
    
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    
    June 30, 2004Lease costs (a)
    
    $
    36
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (6
    )
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    30
 (a)
    
    Total estimated costs, net of estimated sublease income, associated with these accruals
are $62, of which $14 was drawn down by cash payments of $8 and non-cash adjustments of $6
prior to January 1, 2004.
  Three and six months ended June 30, 2003  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, Nortel Networks recorded
total special charges of $(22) and $118, which was net of revisions of $85 and $88 related to
prior accruals.Workforce reduction charges of $96 in the six months ended June 30, 2003 were related to
severance and benefit costs associated with approximately 1,100 employees notified of
termination, which extended across all segments. Offsetting these charges were revisions of
$36, which were primarily related to termination benefits where actual costs were lower than the
estimated amounts across all segments.Contract settlement and lease costs of $58 in the six months ended June 30, 2003 consisted of
net lease charges related to leased facilities (comprised of office, warehouse and manufacturing
space) and leased furniture that were newly identified as no longer being used and which were
valued using the estimated fair value method prescribed under SFAS 146. These costs extended
across all segments. Offsetting these charges were revisions of $39 resulting primarily from
changes in estimates for sublease income and costs to vacate certain properties, across all
segments.Plant and equipment charges of $52 in the six months ended June 30, 2003 were related to current
period write downs to fair value less costs to sell for various leasehold improvements and
excess Optical Networks equipment. Offsetting these charges were revisions of $13 to prior
write downs of assets held for sale related primarily to adjustments to original plans or
estimated amounts for certain facility closures.  7.
    
    Income taxes  During the six months ended June 30, 2004, Nortel Networks recorded a tax benefit of $2 on
earnings from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interests and equity in net
loss of associated companies of $171.During the six months ended June 30, 2003, Nortel Networks recorded a tax benefit of $4 on loss
from continuing operations before income taxes, minority interests and equity in net loss of
associated companies of $159.As of June 30, 2004, Nortel Networks net deferred tax assets, excluding discontinued operations,
were $3,517, reflecting temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax treatment
of certain current assets and liabilities and non-current assets and liabilities, in addition to
the tax benefit of net operating and capital loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards.
These carryforwards expire at various dates beginning in 2004. The valuation allowance was
recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires that tax
valuation allowances be established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
a companys deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation allowances were attributed
to an assessment of positive and negative evidence, including forecasts of future taxable income
to support realization for the net deferred tax assets and Nortel Networks cumulative
consolidated loss position.  8.
    
    Employee benefit plans  Nortel Networks maintains various retirement programs covering substantially all of its
employees, consisting of defined benefit, defined contribution and investment plans. 28




---



##### Table of Contents



Nortel Networks has four kinds of capital accumulation and retirement programs: balanced
capital accumulation and retirement programs (the Balanced Program) and investor capital
accumulation and retirement programs (the Investor Program) available to substantially all of
its North American employees; flexible benefits plan, which includes a group personal pension
plan (the Flexible Benefits Plan), available to substantially all of its employees in the
U.K.; and traditional capital accumulation and retirement programs that include
defined benefit pension plans (the Traditional Program) which are closed to new entrants
in the U.K. and portions of which are closed to new entrants in the U.S. and Canada. Although
these four kinds of programs represent Nortel Networks major retirement programs and may be
available to employees in combination and/or as options within a program, Nortel Networks also
has smaller pension plan arrangements in other countries.Nortel Networks also provides other benefits, including post-retirement benefits and
post-employment benefits. Employees in the Traditional Program are eligible for their existing
company sponsored post-retirement benefits or a modified version of these benefits, depending on
age or years of service. Employees in the Balanced Program are eligible for post-retirement
benefits at reduced company contribution levels, while employees in the Investor Program have
access to post-retirement benefits by purchasing a Nortel Networks-sponsored retiree health care
plan at their own cost.The following details the net pension expense for the defined benefit plans for the three and
six months ended June 30: Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Pension expense:Service cost
    
    $
    30
    
    
    $
    30
    
    
    $
    60
    
    
    $
    59Interest cost
    
    
    103
    
    
    
    106
    
    
    
    207
    
    
    
    207Expected return on plan assets
    
    
    (101
    )
    
    
    (108
    )
    
    
    (203
    )
    
    
    (211
    )Amortization of prior service cost
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    4Amortization of net losses (gains)
    
    
    19
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    23Settlement losses (gains)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3Net pension expense
    
    $
    52
    
    
    $
    43
    
    
    $
    104
    
    
    $
    85
  The following details the net cost components, all related to continuing operations, of
post-retirement benefits other than pensions for the three and six months ended June 30: Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Post-retirement benefit cost:Service cost
    
    $
    2
    
    
    $
    3
    
    
    $
    5
    
    
    $
    5Interest cost
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    20Amortization of prior service cost
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (2
    )Amortization of net losses (gains)
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    (2
    )Net post-retirement benefit cost
    
    $
    12
    
    
    $
    11
    
    
    $
    25
    
    
    $
    21
  During the six months ended June 30, 2004, contributions of $34 were made to the defined
benefit plans and $17 to the post-retirement benefit plans. Nortel Networks contributed an
additional $181 in 2004 to the defined benefit plans for a total contribution of $215, which
excluded $78 of deferred contributions for 2004 which were made in 2003, and an additional $13
in 2004 to the post-retirement benefit plans for a total contribution of $30. 29




---



##### Table of Contents



9.
    
    Divestitures  On February 3, 2004, Nortel Networks sold approximately 7 million common shares of Entrust
Inc. (Entrust) for cash consideration of $33, and recorded a gain of $18 in other income
(expense)  net. As a result of this transaction, Nortel Networks no longer holds any equity
interest in Entrust.During March 2004, Nortel Networks sold 1.8 million shares of Arris Group, Inc. (Arris Group)
for cash consideration of $17, which resulted in a gain of $13, which was recorded in other
income (expense)  net. Following this transaction, Nortel Networks owned 3.2 million Arris
Group common shares or 4.2 percent of Arris Group outstanding common shares (see note 17).On May 7, 2004, Nortel Networks received $80 in proceeds from the sale of certain assets in
connection with a customer contract settlement in Latin America. This resulted in a gain of
$78, which was included in (gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets for the three months
ended June 30, 2004.  10.
    
    Long-term debt, credit and support facilitiesLong-term debt  As a result of the delay in the filing of Nortel Networks 2003 Annual Report and the annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Nortel Networks parent corporation,
NNC (the NNC 2003 Annual Report, and together with the Nortel
Networks 2003 Annual Report, the 2003 Annual Reports), and as a result of the delay in the
filing of Nortel Networks and NNCs quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 (the First Quarter Reports), Nortel Networks and NNC were not in compliance
with their obligations to deliver their respective SEC filings to the trustees under Nortel
Networks and NNCs public debt indentures. Approximately $1,800 of notes of Nortel Networks (or
its subsidiaries) and $1,800 of convertible debt securities of NNC were outstanding under such
indentures as of June 30, 2004. The delay did not result in an automatic event of default and
acceleration of the long-term debt of Nortel Networks or NNC and such default and acceleration
could not occur unless notice of such non-compliance was provided to Nortel Networks or NNC, as
applicable, and Nortel Networks or NNC, as applicable, failed to file and deliver the relevant
report within 90 days after such notice was provided, all in accordance with the terms of the
indentures. Neither Nortel Networks nor NNC received any such notice by June 30, 2004. For
additional information, see note 19.During the six months ended June 30, 2004, Nortel Networks purchased land and two buildings for
$87 that were previously leased by Nortel Networks, through a single transaction variable
interest entity that was consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46R. As a result, Nortel
Networks extinguished a debt of $87.During the six months ended June 30, 2003, Nortel Networks purchased a portion of its 6.125%
Notes due February 15, 2006 with a face value of $39. The transaction resulted in a gain of $4
which was included in the consolidated statement of operations within
other income (expense) 
net for the six months ended June 30, 2003.  Credit facilities  On April 28, 2004, Nortel Networks notified the banks under the Nortel Networks and Nortel
Networks Inc. (NNI) $750 April 2000 five year credit facilities (the Five Year Facilities)
that it was terminating these facilities. Absent such termination, the banks would have been
permitted to terminate their commitments under the Five Year Facilities as a result of Nortel
Networks inability to file the Nortel Networks 2003 Annual Report by April 29, 2004. Upon
termination, the Five Year Facilities were undrawn. For information relating to the impact of
the termination of the Five Year Facilities under the security agreements entered into by Nortel
Networks and various of its subsidiaries, see note 21.  Support facility  On February 14, 2003, Nortel Networks entered into an agreement with Export Development
Canada (EDC) regarding arrangements to provide for support, on a secured basis, of certain
performance related obligations arising out of normal course business activities for the benefit
of Nortel Networks (the EDC Support Facility). Nortel Networks obligations under the EDC
Support Facility also became secured on an equal and ratable basis under the security agreements
entered into by Nortel Networks and various of its subsidiaries that pledged substantially all
of the assets of Nortel Networks in 30




---



##### Table of Contents



favor of the banks under the Five Year Facilities and the holders of Nortel Networks and NNCs
public debt securities. This security became effective in favor of the banks and the public
debt holders on April 4, 2002 (see note 21). On July 10, 2003, Nortel Networks and EDC amended
the terms of the EDC Support Facility by extending the termination date of the facility to
December 31, 2005 from June 30, 2004 and on December 10, 2004, Nortel Networks and EDC amended
the terms of the EDC Support Facility by extending the termination date of the facility to
December 31, 2006 from December 31, 2005 (for additional information relating to the EDC Support
Facility, the Five Year Facilities and the related security agreements, see notes 19 and 21).  On March 10, 2004, NNC announced that the filing of the 2003 Annual Reports with the SEC would
be delayed. On March 15, 2004, NNC announced that the filing of the 2003 Annual Reports with
the SEC would extend beyond March 30, 2004 and that would result in EDC having the right to
terminate its commitments under the EDC Support Facility and to exercise certain rights against
the collateral under the related security agreements (see note 21). Nortel Networks obtained a
waiver from EDC on March 29, 2004 of certain defaults under the EDC Support Facility related to
the delay in filing the 2003 Annual Reports with the SEC, the trustees under Nortel Networks and
NNCs public trust indentures and EDC and to permit continued access to the EDC Support Facility
in accordance with its terms while Nortel Networks and NNC completed their filing obligations.
The waiver also applied to certain related breaches under the EDC Support Facility relating to
the delayed filings and the planned restatements and revisions to Nortel Networks and NNCs
prior financial results (the Related Breaches). The waiver was to remain in effect until the
earliest of certain events or May 29, 2004. On March 29, 2004, Nortel Networks and EDC also
amended the EDC Support Facility to provide that EDC may also suspend its obligation to issue
Nortel Networks any additional support if events occur that have a material adverse effect on
Nortel Networks business, financial position or results of operations and that such amendment
would survive the waiver period.On May 28, 2004, Nortel Networks obtained a new waiver from EDC of certain defaults under the
EDC Support Facility related to the delay in filing the 2003 Annual Reports and the First
Quarter Reports which waiver was to remain in effect until the earliest of certain events or
August 30, 2004. This waiver reclassified the previously committed $300 revolving small bond
sub-facility of the EDC Support Facility as uncommitted support. For additional information
relating to the EDC Support Facility, the waiver and the related security agreements, see notes
19 and 21.As of June 30, 2004, the EDC Support Facility provided for up to $750 in support including $300
of uncommitted revolving support for performance bonds or similar instruments, of which $205 was
utilized, $150 of uncommitted support for receivables sales and/or securitizations, of which
none was utilized, and $300 of uncommitted support for performance bonds and/or receivables
sales and/or securitizations, of which $183 was utilized.  11.
    
    Financial instruments and hedging activities  On January 27, 2003, various cross currency coupon swaps (notional amount of Canadian $350)
were terminated. There was no impact to net earnings (loss) on termination as these instruments
were not designated as hedges and changes in fair value were previously accounted for in the
consolidated statements of operations.Hedge ineffectiveness and the discontinuance of cash flow hedges and fair value hedges that were
accounted for in accordance with SFAS 133 had no material impact on the net earnings (loss) for
the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 and were reported within other income (expense) -
net in the consolidated statements of operations.  12.
    
    Guarantees  Nortel Networks has entered into agreements that contain features which meet the definition
of a guarantee under FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others  an Interpretation of FASB Statements
No. 5, 57 and 107 and Rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34 (FIN 45). FIN 45 defines a
guarantee as a contract that contingently requires Nortel Networks to make payments (either in
cash, financial instruments, other assets, common shares of Nortel Networks Corporation or
through the provision of services) to a third party based on changes in an underlying economic
characteristic (such as interest rates or market value) that is related to an asset, a liability
or an equity security of the guaranteed party or a third partys failure to perform under a
specified agreement. A description of the major types of Nortel Networks outstanding guarantees
as of June 30, 2004 is provided below:  (a)
    
    Business sale and business combination agreements 31




---



##### Table of Contents



In connection with agreements for the sale of portions of its business, including
certain discontinued operations, Nortel Networks has typically retained the liabilities of a
business which relate to events occurring prior to its sale, such as tax, environmental,
litigation and employment matters. Nortel Networks generally indemnifies the purchaser of a
Nortel Networks business in the event that a third party asserts a claim against the
purchaser that relates to a liability retained by Nortel Networks. Some of these types of
guarantees have indefinite terms while others have specific terms extending to June 2008.Nortel Networks also entered into guarantees related to the escrow of shares in business
combinations in prior periods. These types of agreements generally include indemnities that
require Nortel Networks to indemnify counterparties for loss incurred from litigation that
may be suffered by counterparties arising under such agreements. These types of indemnities
apply over a specified period of time from the date of the business combinations and do not
provide for any limit on the maximum potential amount.Nortel Networks is unable to estimate the maximum potential liability for these types of
indemnification guarantees as the business sale agreements generally do not specify a
maximum amount and the amounts are dependent upon the outcome of future contingent events,
the nature and likelihood of which cannot be determined.Historically, Nortel Networks has not made any significant indemnification payments under
such agreements and no significant liability has been accrued in the consolidated financial
statements with respect to the obligations associated with these guarantees.In conjunction with the sale of a subsidiary to a third party, Nortel Networks guaranteed to
the purchaser that specified annual volume levels would be achieved by the business sold
over a ten year period ending December 31, 2007. The maximum amount that Nortel Networks
may be required to pay under the volume guarantee as of June 30, 2004 is $8. A liability of
$8 has been accrued in the consolidated financial statements with respect to the obligation
associated with this guarantee as of June 30, 2004.  (b)
    
    Intellectual property indemnification obligations  Nortel Networks has periodically entered into agreements with customers and suppliers
that include limited intellectual property indemnification obligations that are customary in
the industry. These types of guarantees typically have indefinite terms and generally
require Nortel Networks to compensate the other party for certain damages and costs incurred
as a result of third party intellectual property claims arising from these transactions.The nature of the intellectual property indemnification obligations generally prevents
Nortel Networks from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could
be required to pay to its customers and suppliers. Historically, Nortel Networks has not
made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements. A liability of $6 has
been accrued in the consolidated financial statements with respect to the obligations
associated with these guarantees as of June 30, 2004.  (c)
    
    Lease agreements  Nortel Networks has entered into agreements with its lessors that guarantee the lease
payments of certain assignees of its facilities to lessors. Generally, these lease
agreements relate to facilities Nortel Networks vacated prior to the end of the term of its
lease. These lease agreements require Nortel Networks to make lease payments throughout the
lease term if the assignee fails to make scheduled payments. Most of these lease agreements
also require Nortel Networks to pay for facility restoration costs at the end of the lease
term if the assignee fails to do so. These lease agreements have expiration dates through
June 2015. The maximum amount that Nortel Networks may be required to pay under these types
of agreements is $53 as of June 30, 2004. Nortel Networks generally has the ability to
attempt to recover such lease payments from the defaulting party through rights of
subrogation.Historically, Nortel Networks has not made any significant payments under these types of
guarantees and no significant liability has been accrued in the consolidated financial
statements with respect to the obligations associated with these guarantees.  (d)
    
    Debt agreements 32




---



##### Table of Contents



Nortel Networks has guaranteed the debt of certain customers. These third party debt
agreements require Nortel Networks to make debt payments throughout the term of the related
debt instrument if the customer fails to make scheduled debt payments. These third party
debt agreements have expiration dates extending to May 2012. The maximum amount that Nortel
Networks may be required to pay under these types of debt agreements is $8 as of June 30,
2004. Under most such arrangements, the Nortel Networks guarantee is secured, usually by
the assets being purchased or financed. A liability of $7 has been accrued in the
consolidated financial statements with respect to the obligations associated with these
financial guarantees as of June 30, 2004.Nortel Networks is a full and unconditional guarantor of
NNCs $1,800 4.25% Convertible
Senior Notes (Senior Notes) due September 1, 2008, in the event that NNC does not make
payments for the principal, premium, if any, interest and other amounts, if any, as they are
due. The maximum amount that Nortel Networks may be required to pay under this guarantee is
$1,800 plus the premium, if any, and interest. No amount has been accrued in the
consolidated financial statements with respect to the obligation associated with this
guarantee.  (e)
    
    Indemnification under EDC Support Facility and security agreements  As of June 30, 2004, Nortel Networks had agreed to indemnify EDC under the EDC Support
Facility against any legal action brought against EDC that relates to the provision of
support under the EDC Support Facility. Nortel Networks has also agreed to indemnify the
collateral agent under the security agreements against any legal action brought against the
collateral agent in connection with the collateral pledged under the security agreements.
These indemnifications generally apply to issues that arise during the term of the support
facilities or for as long as the security agreements remain in effect (see notes 10 and 19).Nortel Networks is unable to estimate the maximum potential liability for these types of
indemnification guarantees as the agreements typically do not specify a maximum amount and
the amounts are dependent upon the outcome of future contingent events, the nature and
likelihood of which cannot be determined at this time.Historically, Nortel Networks has not made any significant indemnification payments under
such agreements and no significant liability has been accrued in the consolidated financial
statements with respect to the obligations associated with these indemnification guarantees.Nortel Networks has agreed to indemnify its counterparties in receivables securitization
transactions. The indemnifications provided to counterparties in these types of
transactions may require Nortel Networks to compensate counterparties for costs incurred as
a result of changes in laws and regulations (including tax legislation) or in the
interpretations of such laws and regulations, or as a result of regulatory penalties that
may be suffered by the counterparty as a consequence of the transaction. Certain
receivables securitization transactions include indemnifications requiring the repurchase of
the receivables if the particular transaction becomes invalid. As of June 30, 2004, Nortel
Networks had approximately $252 of securitized receivables which were subject to repurchase
under this provision, in which case Nortel Networks would assume all rights to collect such
receivables. The indemnification provisions generally expire upon expiration of the
securitization agreements, which extend through 2005, or collection of the receivable
amounts by the counterparty.Nortel Networks is generally unable to estimate the maximum potential liability for all of
these types of indemnification guarantees as certain agreements do not specify a maximum
amount and the amounts are dependent upon the outcome of future contingent events, the
nature and likelihood of which cannot be determined at this time.Historically, Nortel Networks has not made any significant indemnification payments or
receivable repurchases under such agreements and no significant liability has been accrued
in the consolidated financial statements with respect to the obligations associated with
these guarantees.  (f)
    
    Other indemnification agreements  Nortel Networks has also entered into other agreements that provide indemnifications to
counterparties in certain transactions including investment banking agreements, guarantees
related to the administration of capital trust accounts, guarantees related to the
administration of employee benefit plans, indentures for its outstanding public debt and
asset sale agreements (other than the business sale agreements noted above). These
indemnification agreements generally require Nortel Networks to indemnify the counterparties
for costs incurred as a result of changes in laws and regulations (including tax
legislation) or in the interpretations of such laws and regulations and/or as a result of
losses from litigation that may be suffered by the counterparties arising from the
transactions. 33




---



##### Table of Contents



These types of indemnification agreements normally extend over an unspecified period of time
from the date of the transaction and do not typically provide for any limit on the maximum
potential payment amount.The nature of such agreements prevents Nortel Networks from making a reasonable estimate of
the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay to its counterparties. The
difficulties in assessing the amount of liability result primarily from the unpredictability
of future changes in laws, the inability to determine how laws apply to counterparties and
the lack of limitations on the potential liability.Historically, Nortel Networks has not made any significant indemnification payments under
such agreements and no significant liability has been accrued in the consolidated financial
statements with respect to the obligations associated with these guarantees.  Product warranties  The following summarizes the accrual for product warranties that was recorded as part of
other accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2004: Balance as of December 31, 2003
    
    $
    382Payments
    
    
    (144
    )Warranties issued
    
    
    110Revisions
    
    
    (21
    )Balance as of June 30, 2004
    
    $
    327
  13.
    
    CommitmentsBid, performance related and other bonds  Nortel Networks has entered into bid, performance related and other bonds associated with
various contracts. Bid bonds generally have a term of less than twelve months, depending on the
length of the bid period for the applicable contract. Performance related and other bonds
generally have a term of twelve months and are typically renewed, as required, over the term of
the applicable contract. The various contracts to which these bonds apply generally have terms
ranging from two to five years. Any potential payments which might become due under these bonds
would be related to Nortel Networks non-performance under the applicable contract.
Historically, Nortel Networks has not had to make material payments under these types of bonds
and does not anticipate that any material payments will be required in the future. The
following table sets forth the maximum potential amount of future payments under bid,
performance related and other bonds, net of the corresponding restricted cash and cash
equivalents, as of the following periods: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Bid and performance related bonds(a)
    
    $
    407
    
    
    $
    427Other bonds (b)
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    53Total bid, performance related and other bonds
    
    $
    461
    
    
    $
    480
 (a)
    
    Net of restricted cash and cash equivalent amounts of $3 and $14 as of June 30, 2004
and December 31, 2003, respectively.(b)
    
    Net of restricted cash and cash equivalent amounts of $29 and $31 as of June 30, 2004
and December 31, 2003, respectively.
 Customer financing  Pursuant to certain financing agreements, Nortel Networks is committed to provide future
financing in connection with purchases of Nortel Networks products and services. Commitments to
extend future financing generally have conditions for funding, fixed expiration or termination
dates and specific interest rates and purposes. Nortel Networks attempts to limit its financing
credit risk by utilizing an internal credit committee that monitors the credit exposure of
Nortel Networks. The following table sets forth customer financing related information and
commitments, excluding discontinued operations, as of the following periods: 34




---



##### Table of Contents



June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Drawn and outstanding  gross
    
    $
    369
    
    
    $
    401Provisions for doubtful accounts
    
    
    (278
    )
    
    
    (281
    )Drawn and outstanding  net(a)
    
    
    91
    
    
    
    120Undrawn commitments (b)
    
    
    65
    
    
    
    180Total customer financing
    
    $
    156
    
    
    $
    300
 (a)
    
    Included short-term and long-term amounts. Short-term and long-term amounts were
included in accounts receivable  net and other assets, respectively, in the consolidated
balance sheets.(b)
    
    On January 8, 2004, Nortel Networks negotiated an agreement with a certain customer and
reduced Nortel Networks aggregate undrawn customer financing commitments from $180 to $69.
  During the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, Nortel Networks recorded net customer
financing bad debt recoveries of nil and $70, respectively.During the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, Nortel Networks entered into certain
agreements to restructure and/or settle various customer financing and related receivables. As
a result of these transactions, Nortel Networks received cash consideration of approximately $15
and $210, respectively, to settle outstanding receivables with a net carrying value of $14 and
$117, respectively.During the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, Nortel Networks reduced undrawn customer
financing commitments by $115 and $131, respectively, as a result of the expiration or
cancellation of commitments and changing customer business plans. As of June 30, 2004, all
undrawn commitments were available for funding under the terms of the financing agreements. Venture capital financing  Nortel Networks has entered into agreements with selected venture capital firms where the
venture capital firms make and manage investments in start-ups and emerging enterprises. The
agreements require Nortel Networks to fund requests for additional capital up to its commitments
when and if requests for additional capital are solicited by the venture capital firm. Nortel
Networks had remaining commitments, if requested, of $19 and $24 as of June 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, respectively. These commitments expire at various dates through 2012.  14.
    
    Restricted cash and cash equivalents  As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, approximately $52 and $63, respectively, of cash
and cash equivalents was restricted as collateral for certain bid, performance related and other
bonds as well as for certain normal course of business transactions. The cash and cash
equivalents collateral was in addition to the payment of fees and was required as a result of
the general economic and industry environment and Nortel Networks credit ratings.  15.
    
    Stock-based compensation plans  As a result of NNCs March 10, 2004 announcements, as described in note 19, Nortel Networks
suspended as of March 10, 2004: the purchase of Nortel Networks Corporation common shares under
the stock purchase plans for eligible employees in eligible countries that facilitate the
acquisition of Nortel Networks Corporation common shares at a discount; the exercise of
outstanding options granted under the Nortel Networks Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan or
Nortel Networks Corporation 1986 Stock Option Plan As Amended and Restated, or the grant of any
additional options under those plans, or the exercise of outstanding options granted under
employee stock option plans previously assumed by Nortel Networks or NNC in connection with
mergers and acquisitions; and the purchase of units in a NNC stock fund or purchase of Nortel
Networks Corporation common shares under Nortel Networks defined contribution and investment
plans, until such time, at the earliest, that Nortel Networks and NNC are in compliance with
U.S. and Canadian regulatory securities filing requirements.  16.
    
    Comprehensive income (loss)  The following are the components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the three
and six months ended June 30: 35




---



##### Table of Contents



Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Net earnings (loss)
    
    $
    54
    
    
    $
    (40
    )
    
    $
    171
    
    
    $
    (92
    )Other comprehensive income (loss) adjustments:Change in foreign currency translation adjustment(a)
    
    
    (68
    )
    
    
    220
    
    
    
    (72
    )
    
    
    294Unrealized gain (loss) on investments  net (b)
    
    
    (41
    )
    
    
    43
    
    
    
    (60
    )
    
    
    44Minimum pension liability adjustment  net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    Unrealized derivative gain (loss) on cash flow hedges  net (c)
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    (12
    )
    
    
    21Comprehensive income (loss)
    
    $
    (61
    )
    
    $
    231
    
    
    $
    28
    
    
    $
    267
 (a)
    
    The change in the foreign currency translation adjustment was not adjusted for income
taxes since it related to indefinite term investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries.(b)
    
    Certain securities deemed available-for-sale by Nortel Networks were measured at fair
value. Unrealized holding gains (losses) related to these securities were excluded from
net earnings (loss) and were included in accumulated other comprehensive loss until
realized. Unrealized gain (loss) on investments was net of tax of nil and nil for the
three months and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and net of tax of $(2) and
$3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.(c)
    
    During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, nil and $3 of net derivative gains
(losses) were reclassified to other income (expense)  net, respectively. During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2003, $12 and $13 of net derivative gains (losses) were
reclassified to other income (expense)  net, respectively. Nortel Networks estimates that
no derivative gains (losses) included in accumulated other comprehensive loss will be
reclassified into net earnings (loss) within the next 12 months.
  17.
    
    Discontinued operations  During the year ended December 31, 2003, Nortel Networks substantially completed the wind
down of its access solutions operations. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, there was
no change to the initial disposal strategy or intent to exit the business which was approved by
the Nortel Networks Board of Directors on June 14, 2001.The following unaudited consolidated financial results for discontinued operations are presented
as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 for the consolidated balance sheets and for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 for the consolidated statements of operations and
for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 for the consolidated statements of cash flows: Consolidated statements of operations: Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Revenues
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    3
    
    
    $
    1
    
    
    $
    7Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  net of tax (a)
    
    $
    6
    
    
    $
    (8
    )
    
    $
    7
    
    
    $
    125
 (a)
    
    Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations was net of applicable income tax of
nil and nil for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and net of
applicable income tax of nil and $8 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003,
respectively.
 Consolidated balance sheets: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Deferred income taxes
    
    $
    22
    
    
    $
    26Other current assets
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    2Total current assets of discontinued operations(a) (b)
    
    
    24
    
    
    
    28Other long-term assets (b) (c)
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    4Total assets of discontinued operations
    
    $
    28
    
    
    $
    32Current liabilities (b) (d)
    
    $
    4
    
    
    $
    6Long-term liabilities (b)
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    1Total liabilities of discontinued operations
    
    $
    5
    
    
    $
    7
 36




---



##### Table of Contents



(a)
    
    Included accounts receivable of nil, which was net of provisions of $3 and $5, as of
June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Included inventories of nil and nil,
which was net of provisions of $66 and $75, as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
respectively.(b)
    
    Current assets, other long-term assets, current liabilities and long-term liabilities
of discontinued operations were included in other current assets, other assets, other
accrued liabilities and other liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance
sheets.(c)
    
    Included customer financing receivables of $4 and $4, which was net of provisions of
$55 and $55, as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.(d)
    
    Consisted of future contractual obligations and estimated liabilities of $4 and $6 as
of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
 Consolidated statements of cash flows: June 30,
    
    
    June 30,2004
    
    
    2003Cash flows from (used in) discontinued operationsOperating activities
    
    $
    11
    
    
    $
    83Investing activities
    
    
    
    
    
    
    241Net cash from (used in) discontinued operations
    
    $
    11
    
    
    $
    324
 Activity during the six months ended June 30, 2003  Nortel Networks recorded net earnings from discontinued operations  net of tax, of $125
for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The significant items included in net earnings are
summarized below.On March 24, 2003, Nortel Networks sold 8 million common shares of Arris Group back to Arris
Group for cash consideration of $28 pursuant to a March 11, 2003 agreement, which resulted in a
gain of $12. Following this transaction, Nortel Networks interest in Arris Group was reduced to
18.8 percent, and it ceased equity accounting for the investment. As a result, Nortel Networks
now classifies its remaining ownership interest in Arris Group as an available-for-sale
investment within continuing operations. Nortel Networks continues to dispose of its interest
in Arris Group and the gain or loss on the sale of shares subsequent to the first quarter of
2003 has been included in other income (expense)  net (see note 9).On March 18, 2003, Nortel Networks assigned its subordinated redeemable preferred interest in
Arris Interactive, L.L.C. (Arris Interactive) to ANTEC Corporation, an Arris Group company,
for cash consideration of $88. As a result of this transaction, Nortel Networks recorded a loss
of $2. Also in connection with the March 2003 transactions, Nortel Networks received $11 upon
settlement of a sales representation agreement with Arris Group and recorded a gain of $11.On March 20, 2003, Nortel Networks entered into an agreement with a customer to restructure
approximately $465 of trade and customer financing receivables owed to Nortel Networks, the
majority of which was previously provisioned. As a result of the restructuring agreement,
Nortel Networks received consideration including cash of $125, notes receivable and an ownership
interest which have been fully provided for and the mutual release of all other claims between
the parties. A gain of $66 was recorded as a result of the transaction. In addition to the
restructuring agreement, a five year equipment and services supply agreement was entered into
requiring customer payment terms of either cash in advance or guarantee by letters of credit in
favor of Nortel Networks.  18.
    
    Contingencies  Subsequent to the February 15, 2001 announcement in which NNC provided revised guidance for
financial performance for the 2001 fiscal year and the first quarter of 2001, NNC and certain of
its then current officers and directors were named as defendants in more than twenty-five
purported class action lawsuits. These lawsuits in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern
District of New York, for the Southern District of New York and for the District of New Jersey
and the provinces of Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia in Canada, on behalf of shareholders
who acquired Nortel Networks Corporation securities as early as October 24, 2000 and as late as
February 15, 2001, allege, among other things, violations of U.S. federal and Canadian
provincial securities laws. These matters also have been the subject of review by Canadian and
U.S. securities regulatory authorities. On May 11, 2001, the defendants filed motions to
dismiss and/or stay in connection with the three proceedings in Quebec primarily based on the
factual allegations lacking substantial connection to Quebec and the inclusion of shareholders
resident in Quebec in the class claimed in the Ontario lawsuit. The plaintiffs in two of these
proceedings in Quebec obtained court approval for discontinuances of their proceedings on
January 17, 2002. The motion to dismiss and/or stay the third proceeding was heard on November
6, 2001 and the court deferred any determination on the motion to the judge who will hear the
application for authorization to commence a class proceeding. On December 6, 2001, the
defendants filed a motion seeking leave to appeal that decision. The 37




---



##### Table of Contents



motion for leave to appeal
was dismissed on March 11, 2002. On October 16, 2001, an order in the Southern District of New
York was filed consolidating twenty-five of the related U.S. class action lawsuits into a single
case, appointing class plaintiffs and counsel for such plaintiffs. The plaintiffs served a
consolidated amended complaint on January 18, 2002. On December 17, 2001, the defendants in the
British Columbia action served notice of a motion requesting the court to decline jurisdiction
and to stay all proceedings on the grounds that British Columbia is an inappropriate forum. The
motion has been adjourned at the plaintiffs request to a future date to be set by the parties.  A class action lawsuit against NNC was also filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York on behalf of shareholders who acquired the securities of JDS Uniphase
Corporation (JDS) between January 18, 2001 and February 15, 2001, alleging violations of the
same U.S. federal securities laws as the above-noted lawsuits.On April 1, 2002, NNC filed a motion to dismiss both the above consolidated U.S. shareholder
class action and the above JDS shareholder class action complaints on the grounds that they
failed to state a cause of action under U.S. federal securities laws. With respect to the JDS
shareholder class action complaint, NNC also moved to dismiss on the separate basis that JDS
shareholders lacked standing to sue NNC. On January 3, 2003, the District Court granted the
motion to dismiss the JDS shareholder class action complaint and denied the motion to dismiss
the consolidated U.S. class action complaint. Plaintiffs appealed the dismissal of the JDS
shareholder class action complaint. On November 19, 2003, oral argument was held before the
Second Circuit on the JDS shareholders appeal of the dismissal of their complaint. On May 19,
2004, the Second Circuit issued an opinion affirming the dismissal of the JDS shareholder class
action complaint and on July 14, 2004 the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs motion for
rehearing. On October 12, 2004, the plaintiffs filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the
U.S. Supreme Court. On November 12, 2004, the defendants filed Brief for the Respondents in
Opposition, and on November 22, 2004, the plaintiffs filed Reply
to Brief in Opposition. On January 10, 2005, the U.S. Supreme
Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari. With
respect to the consolidated U.S. shareholder class action, the plaintiffs served a motion for
class certification on March 21, 2003. On May 30, 2003, the defendants served an opposition to
the motion for class certification. Plaintiffs reply was served on August 1, 2003. The
District Court held oral arguments on September 3, 2003 and issued an order granting class
certification on September 5, 2003. On September 23, 2003, the defendants filed a motion in the
Second Circuit for permission to appeal the class certification decision. The plaintiffs
opposition to the motion was filed on October 2, 2003. On November 24, 2003, the Second Circuit
denied the motion. On March 10, 2004, the District Court approved the form of notice to the
class which was published and mailed.On July 17, 2002, a new purported class action lawsuit (the Ontario Claim) was filed in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List, naming NNC, certain of its current and
former officers and directors and its auditors as defendants. The factual allegations in the
Ontario Claim are substantially similar to the allegations in the consolidated amended complaint
filed in the U.S. District Court described above. The Ontario Claim is on behalf of all
Canadian residents who purchased Nortel Networks Corporation securities (including options on
Nortel Networks Corporation securities) between October 24, 2000 and February 15, 2001. The
plaintiffs claim damages of Canadian $5,000, plus punitive damages in the amount of Canadian
$1,000, prejudgment and postjudgment interest and costs of the action. On September 23, 2003,
the Court issued an order allowing the plaintiffs to proceed to amend the Ontario Claim and
requiring that the plaintiffs serve class certification materials by December 15, 2003. On
September 24, 2003, the plaintiffs filed a notice of discontinuance of the original action filed
in Ontario. On December 12, 2003, plaintiffs
counsel requested an extension of time to January 21, 2004 to deliver class certification
materials. On January 21, 2004, plaintiffs counsel advised the Court that the two
representative plaintiffs in the action no longer wished to proceed, but counsel was prepared to
deliver draft certification materials pending the replacement of the representative plaintiffs.
On February 19, 2004, the plaintiffs counsel advised the Court of a potential new
representative plaintiff. On February 26, 2004, the defendants requested the Court to direct
the plaintiffs counsel to bring a motion to permit the withdrawal of the current representative
plaintiffs and to substitute the proposed representative plaintiff. On June 8, 2004, the Court
signed an order allowing a Second Fresh as Amended Statement of Claim that substituted one new
representative plaintiff, but did not change the substance of the prior claim.A purported class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of
Tennessee on December 21, 2001, on behalf of participants and beneficiaries of the Nortel
Networks Long-Term Investment Plan (the Plan) at any time during the period of March 7, 2000
through the filing date and who made or maintained Plan investments in Nortel Networks
Corporation common shares, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) for
Plan-wide relief and alleging, among other things, material misrepresentations and omissions to
induce Plan participants to continue to invest in and maintain investments in Nortel Networks
Corporation common shares in the Plan. A second purported class action lawsuit, on behalf of
the Plan and Plan participants for whose individual accounts the Plan purchased Nortel Networks
Corporation common shares during the period from October 27, 2000 to February 15, 2001 and
making similar allegations was filed in the same court on March 12, 2002. 38




---



##### Table of Contents



A third purported
class action lawsuit, on behalf of persons who are or were Plan participants or beneficiaries at
any time since March 1, 1999 to the filing date and making similar allegations, was filed in the
same court on March 21, 2002. The first and second purported class action lawsuits were
consolidated by a new purported class action complaint, filed on May 15, 2002 in the same court
and making similar allegations, on behalf of Plan participants and beneficiaries who directed
the Plan to purchase or hold shares of certain funds, which held primarily Nortel Networks
Corporation common shares, during the period from March 7, 2000 through December 21, 2001. On
September 24, 2002, plaintiffs in the consolidated action filed a motion to consolidate all the
actions and to transfer them to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
The plaintiffs then filed a motion to withdraw the pending motion to consolidate and transfer.
The withdrawal was granted by the District Court on December 30, 2002. A fourth purported class
action lawsuit, on behalf of the Plan and Plan participants for whose individual accounts the
Plan held Nortel Networks Corporation common shares during the period from March 7, 2000 through
March 31, 2001 and making similar allegations, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York on March 12, 2003. On March 18, 2003, plaintiffs in the fourth
purported class action filed a motion with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to
transfer all the actions to the Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated
proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1407. On June 24, 2003, the Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation issued a transfer order transferring the Southern District of New York
action to the Middle District of Tennessee (the Consolidated ERISA Action). On September 12,
2003, the plaintiffs in all the actions filed a consolidated class action complaint. On October
28, 2003, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and a motion to stay discovery
pending disposition of the motion to dismiss. On March 30, 2004, the plaintiffs filed a motion
for certification of a class consisting of participants in, or beneficiaries of, the Plan who
held shares of the NNC Stock Fund during the period from March 7, 2000 through March 31, 2001.
On April 27, 2004, the Court granted the defendants motion to stay discovery pending resolution
of defendants motion to dismiss. On June 15, 2004, the plaintiffs filed a First Amended
Consolidated Class Action Complaint that added additional current and former officers and
employees as defendants and expanded the purported class period to extend from March 7, 2000
through to June 15, 2004.  On March 4, 1997, Bay Networks, Inc. (Bay Networks), a company acquired on August 31, 1998,
announced that shareholders had filed two separate lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California (the Federal Court) and the California Superior Court, County
of Santa Clara (the California Court), against Bay Networks and ten of Bay Networks then
current and former officers and directors purportedly on behalf of a class of shareholders who
purchased Bay Networks common shares during the period of May 1, 1995 through October 14, 1996.
On August 17, 2000, the Federal Court granted the defendants motion to dismiss the federal
complaint. On August 1, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied the
plaintiffs appeal of that decision. On April 18, 1997, a second lawsuit was filed in the
California Court, purportedly on behalf of a class of shareholders who acquired Bay Networks
common shares pursuant to the registration statement and prospectus that became effective on
November 15, 1995. The two actions in the California Court were consolidated in April 1998;
however, the California Court denied the plaintiffs motion for class certification. In January
2000, the California Court of Appeal rejected the plaintiffs appeal of the decision. A
petition for review was filed with the California Supreme Court by the plaintiffs and was
denied. In February 2000, new plaintiffs who allege to have been shareholders of Bay Networks
during the relevant periods, filed a motion for intervention in the California Court seeking to
become the representatives of a class of shareholders. The motion was granted on June 8, 2001
and the new plaintiffs filed their complaint-in-intervention on an individual and purported
class representative basis alleging misrepresentations made in connection with the purchase and
sale of
securities of Bay Networks in violation of California statutory and common law. On March 11,
2002, the California Court granted the defendants motion to strike the class allegations. The
plaintiffs were permitted to proceed on their individual claims. The intervenor-plaintiffs
appealed the dismissal of their class allegations. On July 25, 2003, the California Court of
Appeal reversed the trial courts dismissal of the intervenor-plaintiffs class allegations. On
September 3, 2003, the defendants filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court
seeking permission to appeal the Court of Appeal decision. On October 22, 2003, the California
Supreme Court denied, without opinion, the defendants petition for review. On December 22,
2003, the plaintiffs served their motion for certification of a class of purchasers of Bay
Networks common shares from July 25, 1995 through to October 14, 1996. Hearing of the
plaintiffs motion for class certification was held on May 4, 2004. On July 27, 2004, the Court
entered an Amended Order Denying Motion of Intervenor Plaintiffs for Class Certification and
Setting Further Hearing. On August 9, 2004, the intervenor-plaintiffs obtained Court approval
to dismiss their claims and this action and, on September 30, 2004, the Court entered dismissal
with prejudice of the entire action of all parties and all causes of action.Subsequent to the March 10, 2004 announcement in which NNC indicated it was likely that it and
Nortel Networks would need to revise their previously announced unaudited results for the year
ended December 31, 2003, and the results reported in certain of their quarterly reports for
2003, and to restate their previously filed financial results for one or 39




---



##### Table of Contents



more earlier periods,
NNC and certain of its then current and former officers and directors were named as defendants
in 27 purported class action lawsuits. These lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York on behalf of shareholders who acquired Nortel Networks Corporation
securities as early as February 16, 2001 and as late as May 15, 2004, allege, among other
things, violations of U.S. federal securities laws. These matters are also the subject of
investigations by Canadian and U.S. securities regulatory and criminal investigative authorities
(see note 19). On June 30, 2004, the Court signed Orders consolidating the 27 class actions and
appointing lead plaintiffs and lead counsel. The plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action
complaint on September 10, 2004, alleging a class period of April 24, 2003 through and including
April 27, 2004. On November 5, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation and the Audit Committee
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint. On January 18,
2005, the lead plaintiffs, Nortel Networks Corporation, and the Audit Committee Defendants
reached an agreement in which Nortel Networks would withdraw its motion to dismiss and
plaintiffs would dismiss Count II of the complaint which asserts a claim against the Audit
Committee Defendants.  On May 18, 2004, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Middle District of Tennessee on behalf of participants and beneficiaries of the Plan at any time
during the period of December 23, 2003 through the filing date and who made or maintained Plan
investments in Nortel Networks Corporation common shares, under the ERISA for Plan-wide relief
and alleging, among other things, breaches of fiduciary duty. On September 3, 2004, the Court
signed a stipulated order consolidating this action with the Consolidated ERISA Action described
above. On June 16, 2004, a second purported class action lawsuit, on behalf of the Plan and
Plan participants for whose individual accounts the Plan purchased Nortel Networks Corporation
common shares during the period from October 24, 2000 to June 16, 2004, and making similar
allegations, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. On
August 6, 2004, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued a conditional transfer
order to transfer this action to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
for coordinated or consolidated proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1407 with the
Consolidated ERISA Action described above. On August 20, 2004, plaintiffs filed a notice of
opposition to the conditional transfer order with the Judicial Panel. On December 6, 2004, the
Judicial Panel denied the opposition and ordered the action transferred to the U.S. District
Court for the Middle District of Tennessee for coordinated or consolidated proceedings with the
Consolidated ERISA Action described above.On July 28, 2004, Nortel Networks and NNC, and certain directors and officers, and certain
former directors and officers, of Nortel Networks and NNC, were named as defendants in a
purported class proceeding in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on behalf of shareholders
who acquired Nortel Networks Corporation securities as early as November 12, 2002 and as late as
July 28, 2004. This lawsuit alleges, among other things, breaches of trust and fiduciary duty,
oppressive conduct and misappropriation of corporate assets and trust property in respect of the
payment of cash bonuses to executives, officers and employees in 2003 and 2004 under the NNC
Return to Profitability bonus program and seeks damages of Canadian $250 and an order under the
Canada Business Corporations Act directing that an investigation be made respecting these bonus
payments.On July 30, 2004, a shareholders derivative complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York against certain directors and officers, and certain former
directors and officers, of NNC alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties owed to
NNC during the period from 2000 to 2003 including by causing NNC to engage in unlawful conduct
or failing to prevent such conduct; causing NNC to issue false statements; and violating the
law.Except as otherwise described herein, in each of the matters described above, the plaintiffs are
seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages.Nortel Networks is also a defendant in various other suits, claims, proceedings and
investigations which arise in the normal course of business.Nortel Networks is unable to ascertain the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability or
financial impact to Nortel Networks of the above matters which, unless otherwise specified, seek
damages from the defendants of material or indeterminate amounts or could result in fines and
penalties. Nortel Networks cannot determine whether these actions, suits, claims and
proceedings will, individually or collectively, have a material adverse effect on the business,
results of operations, financial condition and liquidity of Nortel Networks. Nortel Networks or
NNC, as applicable, and any named directors and officers of Nortel Networks or NNC, as
applicable, intend to vigorously defend these actions, suits, claims and proceedings. Environmental matters 40




---



##### Table of Contents



Nortel Networks operations are subject to a wide range of environmental laws in various
jurisdictions around the world. Nortel Networks seeks to operate its business in compliance with
such laws. In 2004, Nortel Networks expects to become subject to new European product content
laws and product takeback and recycling requirements that will require full compliance by 2006.
It is expected that these laws will require Nortel Networks to incur additional compliance
costs. Although costs relating to environmental matters have not resulted in a material adverse
effect on the business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity in the past,
there can be no assurance that Nortel Networks will not be required to incur such costs in the
future. Nortel Networks has a corporate environmental management system standard and an
environmental program to promote such compliance. Moreover, Nortel Networks has a periodic,
risk-based, integrated environment, health and safety audit program.Nortel Networks environmental program focuses its activities on design for the environment,
supply chain and packaging reduction issues. Nortel Networks works with its suppliers and other
external groups to encourage the sharing of non-proprietary information on environmental
research.Nortel Networks is exposed to liabilities and compliance costs arising from its past and current
generation, management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. As of June 30, 2004,
the accruals on the consolidated balance sheet for environmental matters were $30. Based on
information available as of June 30, 2004, management believes that the existing accruals are
sufficient to satisfy probable and reasonably estimable environmental liabilities related to
known environmental matters. Any additional liability that may result from these matters, and
any additional liabilities that may result in connection with other locations currently under
investigation, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the business, results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity of Nortel Networks.Nortel Networks has remedial activities under way at 12 sites which are either currently or
previously owned or occupied facilities. An estimate of Nortel Networks anticipated remediation
costs associated with all such sites, to the extent probable and reasonably estimable, is
included in the environmental accruals referred to above in an approximate amount of $30.Nortel Networks is also listed as a potentially responsible party (PRP) under the U.S.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) at six Superfund
sites in the U.S. An estimate of Nortel Networks share of the anticipated remediation costs
associated with such Superfund sites is expected to be de minimis and is included in the
environmental accruals of $30 referred to above.Liability under CERCLA may be imposed on a joint and several basis, without regard to the extent
of Nortel Networks involvement. In addition, the accuracy of Nortel Networks estimate of
environmental liability is affected by several uncertainties such as additional requirements
which may be identified in connection with remedial activities, the complexity and evolution of
environmental laws and regulations, and the identification of presently unknown remediation
requirements. Consequently, Nortel Networks liability could be greater than its current
estimate.  19.
    
    Subsequent events Nortel Networks Audit Committee Independent Review; restatements; related matters  As previously announced by NNC in October 2003, in late October 2003 the Nortel Networks
Audit Committee initiated
the Independent Review of the facts and circumstances leading to the First Restatement and
engaged WCPHD to advise it in connection with the Independent Review.On March 10, 2004, NNC announced that as a result of the work done to date in connection with
the Independent Review, it was re-examining the establishment, timing of, support for and
release to income of certain accruals and provisions in prior periods. Further, it was likely
that NNC and Nortel Networks would need to revise their previously announced unaudited results
for the year ended December 31, 2003, and the results reported in certain of their quarterly
reports for 2003, and to restate their previously filed financial results for one or more
earlier periods. NNC announced on March 15, 2004 that the filing of the 2003 Annual Reports
would be delayed beyond March 30, 2004.On April 5, 2004, NNC announced that the SEC had issued a formal order of investigation in
connection with NNCs previous restatement of its financial results for certain periods, as
announced in October 2003, and NNCs announcements in March 2004 regarding the likely need to
revise certain previously announced results and restate previously filed financial results for
one or more earlier periods. The matter had been the subject of an informal SEC inquiry. On
April 13, 2004, NNC announced that it had received a letter from the staff of the Ontario
Securities Commission (OSC) advising that there is an OSC Enforcement Staff investigation into
the same matters that are the subject of the SEC investigation. 41




---



##### Table of Contents



On April 28, 2004, NNC announced that the Independent Review was extended to include the second
half of 2003 and it was determined that the previously announced unaudited results for the year
ended December 31, 2003 needed to be revised and that the financial results reported in each of
NNCs and Nortel Networks quarterly periods of 2003 and for earlier periods including 2002 and
2001 needed to be restated. NNC also announced that it and Nortel Networks were not expected to
timely file their first quarter 2004 financial statements and, in accordance with Canadian
securities regulations, their 2003 Canadian GAAP audited financial statements and Annual
Information Form.In April 2004, Nortel Networks terminated for cause its former president and chief executive
officer, former chief financial officer and former controller and, in August 2004, seven
additional senior finance employees with significant responsibilities for Nortel Networks
financial reporting as a whole or for their respective business units and geographic regions in
August 2004.On May 14, 2004, NNC announced that it had received a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena for the
production of certain documents, including financial statements and corporate, personnel and
accounting records, prepared during the period from January 1, 2000 to the date of the subpoena.
The materials sought are pertinent to an ongoing criminal investigation being conducted by the
U.S. Attorneys Office for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.On May 17, 2004, NNC announced that the OSC had issued a temporary order that prohibits all
trading by directors, officers and certain current and former employees in the securities of
Nortel Networks and NNC, which temporary order was replaced with a final order issued on May 31,
2004. The final order remains in effect until two full business days following the receipt by
the OSC of all filings required to be made by Nortel Networks and NNC pursuant to Ontario
securities laws.On June 29, 2004, NNC announced that Nortel Networks and NNC did not expect to timely file
financial statements for the second quarter of 2004 and related periodic reports in accordance
with U.S. and Canadian securities laws.On August 16, 2004, NNC received a letter from the Integrated Market Enforcement Team of the
Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) advising NNC that the RCMP would be commencing a criminal
investigation into NNCs financial accounting situation.On August 19, 2004, Nortel Networks announced a new streamlined organizational structure,
effective October 1, 2004, that involved, among other things, combining the businesses of Nortel
Networks four segments into two business organizations: (i) Carrier Networks and Global
Operations, and (ii) Enterprise Networks. Further, a focused workforce reduction of
approximately 3,250 employees was announced. In addition, the Audit Committee anticipated that
there would be work done, in addition to that portion of the inquiry
which affected Nortel
Networks and NNCs ability to finalize their 2003 audited financial statements, in connection
with its Independent Review, on remedial measures, internal controls and improvements to
processes.On October 27, 2004, NNC announced that Nortel Networks and NNC did not expect to file their
third quarter 2004 financial statements, and the related periodic reports, by the required
deadlines in November 2004 in compliance with certain U.S. and Canadian securities regulations.Nortel Networks has terminated for cause 10 individuals, including its former president and
chief executive officer, its former chief financial officer and its former controller. Nortel
Networks has demanded repayment by the individuals terminated for cause of payments made under
Nortel Networks bonus plans in respect of 2003.Subsequent to the March 10, 2004 announcement, numerous class action complaints, including ERISA
class action complaints, have been filed against Nortel Networks and NNC in the U.S. and Canada.
In addition, a derivative action complaint has been filed against NNC. Nortel Networks and NNC
are subject to significant pending civil litigation which, if decided against Nortel Networks
and NNC, could result in substantial damages or other penalties which, in turn, could have a
material adverse effect on the business, results of operations, financial condition and
liquidity of Nortel Networks (see note 18). 42




---



##### Table of Contents



In January 2005, the Audit Committee reported the findings of the Independent Review, together
with its recommendations for governing principles for remedial measures that were developed for
the Audit Committee by WCPHD. Each of Nortel Networks and NNCs Boards of Directors has adopted
those recommendations in their entirety and directed management to develop a detailed plan and
timetable for their implementation, and will monitor their implementation.Also in January 2005, the Nortel Networks Audit Committee determined to review the facts and
circumstances leading to the restatement of certain revenues for specific transactions
identified in the Second Restatement. This review will have a particular emphasis on the
underlying conduct that led to the initial recognition of these revenues. The Audit Committee
will develop any appropriate additional remedial measures, and has engaged WCPHD to advise it in
connection with such review. EDC Support Facility  A further waiver was obtained from EDC effective August 20, 2004 (the August Waiver)
related to the delay in filing the 2003 Annual Reports, the First Quarter Reports and Nortel
Networks and NNCs quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2004 (the
Second Quarter Reports) and the Related Breaches, which waiver was to remain in effect until
the earliest of certain events or September 30, 2004.On September 29, 2004, Nortel Networks obtained a new waiver from EDC (the September Waiver)
which replaced the August Waiver on substantially the same terms as provided in the August
Waiver except that the September Waiver was to remain in effect until the earliest of certain
events or October 31, 2004.On October 29, 2004, Nortel Networks obtained a new waiver from EDC (the October Waiver) which
replaced the September Waiver on substantially the same terms as the September Waiver except
that the October Waiver remained in effect until the earliest of certain events or November 19,
2004.A further waiver was obtained from EDC effective November 19, 2004 (the November Waiver)
related to the delay in filing the 2003 Annual Reports, the First Quarter Reports, the Second
Quarter Reports and Nortel Networks and NNCs quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended September 30, 2004 (the Third Quarter Reports, and together with the 2003 Annual
Reports, the First Quarter Reports and the Second Quarter Reports, the Reports, and the Third
Quarter Reports together with the First Quarter Reports and Second Quarter Reports, the
Quarterly Reports) and the Related Breaches, which waiver was to remain in effect until the
earliest of certain events or December 10, 2004.On December 10, 2004, Nortel Networks obtained a new waiver from EDC (the December Waiver)
which replaced the November Waiver on substantially the same terms as the November Waiver except
that: (i) the December Waiver included an amendment to the EDC Support Facility to extend the
termination date of the EDC Support Facility to December 31, 2006 from December 31, 2005; and
(ii) the December Waiver remains in effect until the earliest of certain events including the
date on which Nortel Networks and NNC have filed all of the Reports or January 15, 2005.On January 14, 2005, NNL obtained a new waiver from EDC (the January Waiver) which replaced
the December Waiver on substantially the same terms as the December Waiver except that the
January Waiver remains in effect until the earliest of certain events including the date on
which Nortel Networks and NNL have filed all of the Reports or February 15, 2005.If Nortel Networks and NNC do not file all of the Reports by February 15, 2005, EDC will have
the right on such date (absent a further waiver in relation to the delayed filings and the
Related Breaches) to: (i) terminate the EDC Support
Facility; (ii) exercise certain rights against collateral; or (iii) require Nortel Networks to
cash collateralize all existing support.In addition, the Related Breaches will continue beyond the filing of the Reports. Accordingly,
EDC will have the right beginning on February 15, 2005 (absent a further waiver of the Related
Breaches) to terminate or suspend the EDC Support Facility and exercise certain other rights
against collateral notwithstanding the filing of the Reports. While Nortel Networks is seeking
a permanent waiver from EDC in connection with the Related Breaches, there can be no assurance
that Nortel Networks will receive any waiver or as to the terms of any such waiver. The $300
revolving small bond sub-facility will not become committed support until all of the Reports
have been filed with the SEC, the trustees under Nortel Networks and NNCs public trust
indentures and EDC and Nortel Networks obtains a permanent waiver of the Related Breaches. 43




---



##### Table of Contents



Debt securities  As a result of the delay in filing the Reports, Nortel Networks and NNC have not been in
compliance with their obligations to deliver their respective SEC filings to relevant parties
under Nortel Networks and NNCs public debt indentures. As of December 31, 2004, approximately
$1,800 of notes of Nortel Networks (or its subsidiaries) and $1,800 of convertible debt
securities of NNC were outstanding.These delays have not resulted in an automatic event of default and acceleration of the
outstanding long-term debt and such default and acceleration cannot occur unless notice of such
non-compliance from holders of 25% of the outstanding principal amount of any relevant debt
securities is provided to Nortel Networks or NNC, as applicable, and Nortel Networks or NNC, as
applicable, fail to file and deliver the relevant report within 90 days after such notice is
provided, all in accordance with the terms of the indentures. While such notice could have been
given at any time after March 30, 2004, neither Nortel Networks nor NNC has received a notice to
the date of this report.After filing the 2003 Annual Reports, the First Quarter
Reports and the Second Quarter Reports, as a result of the delay in
filing the Third Quarter Reports, Nortel Networks and NNC continue not
to be in compliance with their obligations under Nortel Networks and NNCs public debt
indentures as described above. If notice were given, Nortel Networks
believes that it is probable that it and NNC would file and deliver
the Third Quarter Reports within 90 days of the receipt of such
a notice. In the unlikely event that acceleration of Nortel Networks and
NNCs debt securities were to occur, Nortel Networks may be unable to meet its payment
obligations. Stock exchanges  As a result of the continued delay in filing the Quarterly Reports, Nortel Networks is in
breach of the continued listing requirements of the NYSE and the TSX. To date, neither the NYSE
nor the TSX has commenced any suspension or delisting procedures in respect of Nortel Networks
Corporation common shares or other of Nortel Networks or NNCs listed securities. The
commencement of any suspension or delisting procedures by either exchange remains, at all times,
at the discretion of such exchange. Directory and operator services business  On August 2, 2004, Nortel Networks completed the contribution of certain assets and
liabilities of its directory and operator services (DOS) business to VoltDelta Resources LLC
(VoltDelta), a wholly owned subsidiary of Volt Information Sciences, Inc. (VIS), in return
for a 24 percent interest in VoltDelta. After a period of two years, Nortel Networks and VIS
each have an option to cause Nortel Networks to sell its VoltDelta shares to VIS for proceeds
ranging from $25 to $70. As a result of this transaction, approximately 160 Nortel Networks DOS
employees in North America and Mexico joined VoltDelta. Nortel Networks recorded a gain on sale
of businesses and assets of approximately $50 in the third quarter of 2004. Evolution of Nortel Networks supply chain strategy  On June 29, 2004, Nortel Networks announced an agreement with Flextronics International
Ltd. (Flextronics), regarding the divestiture of substantially all of Nortel Networks
remaining manufacturing operations, including product integration, testing and repair operations
carried out in Nortel Networks Systems Houses in Calgary and Montreal, Canada and Campinas,
Brazil, as well as certain activities related to these locations, including the management of
the supply chain, related suppliers, and third-party logistics. In Europe, Flextronics has made
an offer to purchase similar operations at the Nortel Networks Monkstown, Northern Ireland and
Chateaudun, France Systems Houses, subject to the completion of the required information and
consultation process.Under the terms of the agreement and offer, Flextronics will also acquire Nortel Networks global
repair services, as well as certain design assets in Ottawa and Monkstown related to hardware
and embedded software design, and related product verification for certain established optical
products.Nortel Networks and Flextronics have entered into a four year supply agreement for manufacturing
services (whereby Flextronics will manage approximately $2,500 of Nortel Networks annual cost of
sales) and a three year supply agreement for design services. The portion of the transaction
related to the optical design activities in Ottawa and Monkstown was completed on November 1,
2004. The portions of the transaction related to the manufacturing activities in Montreal and
Calgary are expected to close in the first and second quarters of 2005, respectively. The
balance of the transaction is expected to close on separate dates occurring during the first
half of 2005. These transactions are subject to customary conditions and regulatory approvals. 44




---



##### Table of Contents



The successful completion of the agreement and offer with Flextronics will result in the
transfer of approximately 2,500 employees from Nortel Networks to Flextronics. Nortel Networks
expects to receive cash proceeds ranging from approximately $675 to $725, which will be
allocated to each separate closing and, with respect to each closing, will be paid on an
installment basis up to nine months thereafter. Such payments will be subject to a number of
adjustments, including potential post-closing date asset valuations and potential post-closing
indemnity payments. Flextronics also has the ability in certain cases to exercise rights to
sell back to Nortel Networks certain inventory and equipment after the expiration of a specified
period (of up to fifteen months) following each respective closing date. Nortel Networks does
not expect such rights to be exercised with respect to any material amount of inventory and/or
equipment. The cash proceeds estimate is comprised of approximately $475 to $525 for inventory
and equipment and $200 for intangible assets. The cash proceeds would be partially offset by
related estimated transaction costs (including transition, potential severance, and information
technology implementation and real estate costs) of approximately $200.As a result of the proposed sale of the Northern Ireland Systems House to Flextronics, Nortel
Networks has determined that it is probable that certain grants received from government
agencies related to employment achievement targets will have to be repaid. The ultimate
repayment amount, if any, cannot be determined at this time. The total grants received which
could be subject to repayment is approximately $35. No amount has been accrued in the
consolidated financial statements. Other  In August 2004, Nortel Networks entered into a contract with Bharat Sanchar Nigram Limited
to establish a wireless network in India. Nortel Networks commitments to date for orders
received under this contract have resulted in an estimated project loss of approximately $150,
which has been recorded in the third quarter of 2004.On October 26, 2004, Nortel Networks entered into an agreement with Foundry Networks, Inc.
(Foundry) to settle outstanding patent infringement claims and counterclaims by the parties.
As part of the settlement, Nortel Networks granted Foundry a four year license under certain
patents, and Foundry paid $35 to Nortel Networks.On December 15 and 16, 2004, Nortel Networks sold certain notes receivable and convertible notes
receivable that had been received as a result of the restructuring of a customer financing
arrangement for cash proceeds of $116. The net carrying amount of the notes receivable and
convertible notes receivable was $56.On December 23, 2004, a customer financing arrangement was restructured. The notes receivable
that were restructured had a net carrying amount as of December 31, 2003 of $13, net of
provisions for doubtful accounts of $147 ($55 of the provision is included in discontinued
operations). Nortel Networks is currently assessing the value of the restructured notes
receivable and expects that an increase in value from the net carrying amount has occurred.On January 20, 2005, Nortel Networks signed a Joint Venture Framework Agreement with China
Putian Corporation to establish a joint venture for R&D, manufacture and sale of third
generation (3G) mobile telecommunications equipment and products to customers in China. Nortel
Networks expects to have a definitive joint venture agreement by June 30, 2005. Nortel Networks
anticipates that it will own 49% of the joint venture and China Putian will own 51%.On January 23, 2005, Nortel Networks signed a Memorandum of Understanding with LG Electronics to
establish a joint venture for providing high quality, leading edge telecommunications equipment
and networking solutions to Korea and other markets globally. The proposed joint venture is
subject to execution of a definitive agreement. Nortel Networks
expects to complete this transaction in the second quarter of 2005. In the proposed joint
venture, Nortel Networks anticipates that it will have 50% plus one share.  20.
    
    Reconciliation from U.S. GAAP to Canadian GAAP  New Canadian securities regulations allow issuers that are required to file reports with
the SEC, upon meeting certain conditions, to satisfy their Canadian continuous disclosure
obligations by using financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Accordingly,
for interim periods in fiscal 2004 and 2005, Nortel Networks will include in the notes to its
consolidated financial statements a reconciliation highlighting the material differences between
its financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP as compared to financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada
(Canadian GAAP). Subsequent to 2005, no further interim reconciliation will be required under
current Canadian securities regulations. Prior to 2004, Nortel Networks prepared interim
financial statements (with accompanying notes) and Managements
Discussion and Analysis 
Canadian Supplement in accordance with Canadian GAAP, all of which were presented as a separate
report and filed with the relevant Canadian securities regulators in compliance with its
Canadian continuous disclosure obligations. 45




---



##### Table of Contents



The consolidated financial statements of Nortel Networks have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP and the accounting rules and regulations of the SEC which differ in certain material
respects from those principles and practices that Nortel Networks would have followed had its
consolidated financial statements been prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. The following
is a reconciliation of the net earnings (loss) between U.S. GAAP and Canadian GAAP for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003: Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003As restated *
    
    
    
    
    
    As restated *Net earnings (loss)U.S. GAAP
    
    $
    54
    
    
    $
    (40
    )
    
    $
    171
    
    
    $
    (92
    )Derivative accounting(b)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (15
    )
    
    
    26
    
    
    
    (19
    )Cumulative effect of accounting change  net of tax(c)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12Other
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    (20
    )Canadian GAAP
    
    $
    55
    
    
    $
    (56
    )
    
    $
    202
    
    
    $
    (119
    )
 *
    
    See note 20(i).
  The following details the material differences between U.S. GAAP and Canadian GAAP for
balance sheet information as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003: June 30, 2004
    
    
    December 31, 2003U.S.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Canadian
    
    
    U.S.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    CanadianGAAP
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    GAAP
    
    
    GAAP
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    GAAPASSETSCurrent assets(g)
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    8,382
    
    
    $
    6
    
    
    $
    8,388
    
    
    $
    8,613
    
    
    $
    4
    
    
    $
    8,617Investments(d)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    156
    
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    134
    
    
    
    244
    
    
    
    (105
    )
    
    
    139Plant and equipment  net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,537
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    1,536
    
    
    
    1,654
    
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    1,649Goodwill(a)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,121
    
    
    
    (910
    )
    
    
    1,211
    
    
    
    2,125
    
    
    
    (910
    )
    
    
    1,215Intangible assets  net(h)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    77
    
    
    
    (39
    )
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    86
    
    
    
    (41
    )
    
    
    45Deferred income taxes  net (h)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,272
    
    
    
    (199
    )
    
    
    3,073
    
    
    
    3,397
    
    
    
    (197
    )
    
    
    3,200Other assets(b) (h)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    307
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    314
    
    
    
    337
    
    
    
    24
    
    
    
    361Total assets
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    15,852
    
    
    $
    (1,158
    )
    
    $
    14,694
    
    
    $
    16,456
    
    
    $
    (1,230
    )
    
    $
    15,226LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYCurrent liabilities(f) (g)
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    4,462
    
    
    $
    5
    
    
    $
    4,467
    
    
    $
    4,961
    
    
    $
    5
    
    
    $
    4,966Long-term debt(b)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,062
    
    
    
    (36
    )
    
    
    2,026
    
    
    
    2,091
    
    
    
    (55
    )
    
    
    2,036Deferred income taxes  net(h)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    162
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    175
    
    
    
    190
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    203Other liabilities(b) (h)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,843
    
    
    
    (1,172
    )
    
    
    1,671
    
    
    
    2,944
    
    
    
    (1,155
    )
    
    
    1,789Total liabilities
    
    
    
    
    
    
    9,529
    
    
    
    (1,190
    )
    
    
    8,339
    
    
    
    10,186
    
    
    
    (1,192
    )
    
    
    8,994Minority interests in subsidiary companies
    
    
    
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    80
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    80Total
shareholders equity(d)(f)(h)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6,238
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    6,270
    
    
    
    6,190
    
    
    
    (38
    )
    
    
    6,152Total liabilities and shareholders equity
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    15,852
    
    
    $
    (1,158
    )
    
    $
    14,694
    
    
    $
    16,456
    
    
    $
    (1,230
    )
    
    $
    15,226
  The significant differences between U.S. GAAP and Canadian GAAP that impact the
consolidated financial statements of Nortel Networks include the following:  (a)
    
    Business combinations  All of Nortel Networks business combinations have been accounted for using the purchase
method. Until June 30, 2001, under Canadian GAAP, when common share consideration was
involved, the purchase price of Nortel Networks acquisitions was determined based on the
average trading price per Nortel Networks Corporation common share for a reasonable period
before and after the date the transaction was closed. Under U.S. GAAP, when common share
consideration was involved, the purchase price of the acquisitions was determined based on
the average price per Nortel Networks Corporation common share for a reasonable period
before and after the date the 46




---



##### Table of Contents



acquisition was announced or the date on which the exchange
ratio became fixed. After June 30, 2001, treatment under Canadian GAAP was the same as
under U.S. GAAP for measurement of share consideration. As a result of the difference
between Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP until June 30, 2001, the value of purchase price
consideration assigned to acquisitions may have varied significantly depending on the length
of time between the announcement date and the closing date of the transaction and the
volatility of Nortel Networks Corporation common share price within that time frame.  Stock options assumed on acquisitions were recorded at fair value for acquisitions on or
after July 1, 2000 under U.S. GAAP, and for acquisitions on or after July 1, 2001 under
Canadian GAAP. Beginning with acquisitions completed subsequent to July 1, 2000, U.S. GAAP
requires an allocation of a portion of the purchase price to deferred compensation related
to the intrinsic value of unvested options held by employees of the companies acquired. The
deferred compensation is amortized to net earnings (loss) based on the remaining vesting
period of the option awards. With the adoption of the Canadian Institute of Chartered
Accountants (CICA) Handbook Section 3870, Stock-based Compensation and Other Stock-based
Payments, on January 1, 2002, unearned compensation is recorded on unvested options held by
employees of acquired companies. Previously, there was no requirement to record deferred
compensation in respect of such unvested options under Canadian GAAP. Nortel Networks has
not completed any acquisitions subsequent to January 1, 2002. The difference in accounting
for options assumed or issued to the value ascribed under U.S. GAAP as part of acquisitions
discussed above can result in a different balance being ascribed to goodwill under U.S.
GAAP.The potential differences in the initial measurement of goodwill in business combinations
under Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP may result in a difference in the amount of any subsequent
goodwill impairment charge. Effective January 1, 2002, under both U.S. GAAP and Canadian
GAAP, the method used in accounting for goodwill changed from an amortization method to an
impairment only method, thereby eliminating any impact on net earnings (loss) due to the
amortization of different amounts of goodwill during these periods.Under Canadian GAAP, Nortel Networks is required to capitalize the value assigned to
in-process R&D and amortize the asset value over its estimated useful life. Under U.S.
GAAP, this value is written off immediately. The difference due to capitalization of
in-process R&D expense is included in other, in the above reconciliation of net earnings
(loss).  (b)
    
    Derivative accounting  Under U.S. GAAP, effective January 1, 2001, Nortel Networks adopted SFAS 133, which was
subsequently amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and
Certain Hedging Activities  an Amendment of SFAS No. 133, and SFAS No. 149, Amendment of
Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Under Canadian GAAP, gains
and losses on derivatives that are designated as hedges and that manage the underlying risks
of anticipated transactions are not recorded until the underlying hedged item is recorded in
net earnings (loss) and hedge ineffectiveness is not recorded until settlement. Under U.S.
GAAP, the accounting
for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative
and the resulting designation. For fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the
derivative and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are reported in net
earnings (loss) from continuing operations immediately. For cash flow hedges, the effective
portion of the gains or losses is reported as a component of other comprehensive income
(loss) and the ineffective portion is reported in net earnings (loss) from continuing
operations immediately. Foreign currency hedges can fall into either fair value hedges or
cash flow hedges and are accounted for accordingly.Under U.S. GAAP, an embedded derivative is accounted for at fair value separate from the
host contract when certain specified conditions are met. Under Canadian GAAP, embedded
derivatives are not accounted for separately from the host contract.Effective January 1, 2004, Nortel Networks adopted Accounting Guideline 13, Hedging
Relationships (AcG-13), which establishes specific criteria for derivatives to qualify
for hedge accounting. Nortel Networks had been previously applying these criteria under
U.S. GAAP, therefore, there was no impact on adoption of AcG-13. Concurrent with the adoption of AcG-13, Nortel Networks also adopted the CICAs Emerging
Issues Committee (EIC) 128, Accounting for Trading, Speculative or Non-Hedging Derivative
Financial Instruments (EIC 128), which requires that certain freestanding derivative
instruments that give rise to a financial asset or liability, and do not qualify for hedge
accounting under AcG-13, be recognized on the balance sheet and
measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings (loss) in each period. As a result of the
adoption of EIC 128, certain warrants, which had been previously recorded at cost under
Canadian GAAP, are required to be
recorded at fair value consistent with U.S. GAAP. The impact of this accounting change,
which has been recorded prospectively as at January 1, 2004, was an increase to investments
and other income of $23 during the six months ended June 30, 2004. 47




---



##### Table of Contents



(c)
    
    Asset retirement obligations  Under U.S. GAAP, Nortel Networks adopted SFAS 143 effective January 1, 2003, and
recorded a cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax within net earnings (loss) on
the date of adoption. Nortel Networks adopted similar Canadian guidance, CICA Handbook
Section 3110, Asset Retirement Obligations, effective January 1, 2004, with retroactive
restatement of prior periods. Under Canadian GAAP, the cumulative effect of adoption as of
January 1, 2003 was recorded as an adjustment to opening accumulated deficit, as opposed to
an adjustment within net earnings (loss) under U.S. GAAP, resulting in a difference of $12.  (d)
    
    Investments  Under U.S. GAAP, certain investment securities deemed available-for-sale by Nortel
Networks are remeasured to fair value each period, with unrealized holding gains (losses)
included in other comprehensive income (loss) until realized. Under Canadian GAAP, these
investments are recorded at historical cost unless a loss, that is considered other than
temporary, occurs.  (e)
    
    Other financial statement presentation differences  Under Canadian GAAP, global investment tax credits are required to be deducted from R&D
expense while under U.S. GAAP, these amounts are required to be deducted from the income tax
benefit (expense). The impact of this difference in the three and six months ended June 30,
2004 of $13 and $24,respectively, and in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2003 of $10 and $19, respectively, was to increase or decrease net earnings
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, non-controlling interests and equity
in net loss of associated companies under Canadian GAAP, with a corresponding increase or
decrease in income tax benefit (expense).Under Canadian GAAP, Nortel Networks is required to present a consolidated statement of cash
flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, whereas under U.S. GAAP, a
consolidated statement of cash flows is only required for the six months ended June 30, 2004
and 2003. The following table presents consolidated statement of cash flows data for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP.
There are no significant differences between U.S. and Canadian GAAP that impact the
consolidated statement of cash flows. 48




---



##### Table of Contents



Three months ended June 30,
    
    
    Six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Net cash from (used in) operating activities
of continuing operations
    
    $
    98
    
    
    $
    302
    
    
    $
    (194
    )
    
    $
    185Net cash from (used in) investing activities
of continuing operations
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    (26
    )
    
    
    34
    
    
    
    (37
    )Net cash from (used in) financing activities
of continuing operations
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    (64
    )
    
    
    (107
    )
    
    
    (131
    )Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    60
    
    
    
    (9
    )
    
    
    78Net cash from (used in) continuing operations
    
    
    101
    
    
    
    272
    
    
    
    (276
    )
    
    
    95Net cash from (used in) discontinued operations
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    293Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    115
    
    
    
    281
    
    
    
    (280
    )
    
    
    388Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    
    
    3,537
    
    
    
    3,850
    
    
    
    3,932
    
    
    
    3,743Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
    
    $
    3,652
    
    
    $
    4,131
    
    
    $
    3,652
    
    
    $
    4,131
  (f)
    
    Other  Under U.S. GAAP, effective December 31, 2002, Nortel Networks adopted the disclosure
requirements of FIN 45. In addition, effective January 1, 2003, Nortel Networks adopted the
initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 that require a guarantor to
recognize, at the inception of certain types of guarantees, a liability for the estimated
fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The recognition
requirements of FIN 45 are applicable for certain guarantees issued or modified after
December 31, 2002. Under Canadian GAAP, there is no requirement to recognize a liability
for the estimated fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.
However, a contingent loss that is likely to be incurred is recognized if it can be
reasonably estimated.Under U.S. GAAP, effective January 1, 2003, Nortel Networks adopted SFAS 146. SFAS 146
requires that costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the
liability is incurred. Under Canadian GAAP, the Emerging Issues Committee (EIC) of the
CICA issued EIC 134, Accounting for Severance and Termination Benefits (EIC 134), and
EIC 135, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit and Disposal Activities (Including Costs
Incurred in a Restructuring) (EIC 135), which harmonize the requirements with SFAS 146.
Effective March 31, 2003, Nortel Networks adopted EIC 134 and EIC 135.Under U.S. GAAP, translation adjustments for self-sustaining subsidiaries are reported as a
component of other comprehensive income (loss), whereas, under Canadian GAAP, these
translation adjustments are classified as foreign currency translation adjustment, also a
component of shareholders equity.  (g)
    
    Joint ventures  Nortel Networks has a number of joint ventures with other parties. Under U.S. GAAP,
investments in joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method, whereas under
Canadian GAAP, the proportionate consolidation method is used. The difference in accounting
does not impact net earnings (loss), but does impact certain other consolidated financial
statement items.  (h)
    
    Pension and other post-retirement benefits  Under U.S. GAAP, a minimum additional pension liability must be recognized in the
amount of the excess of the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation over the recorded
pension benefit liability. An offsetting intangible pension asset is recorded equal to the
unrecognized prior service costs, with any difference recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive loss. No such adjustments are required under Canadian GAAP.  (i)
    
    Restatement  As described in note 2, Nortel Networks has restated its consolidated financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the quarters ended March 31,
June 30, and September 30, 2003. The following
table presents the impact of the Second Restatement adjustments on Nortel Networks
previously reported 49




---



##### Table of Contents



consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2003 prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP: Three months ended June 30, 2003
    
    
    Six months ended June 30, 2003As previously
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    As previously(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    reported
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    As restated
    
    
    reported
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    As restatedRevenues
    
    $
    2,340
    
    
    $
    (52
    )
    
    $
    2,288
    
    
    $
    4,716
    
    
    $
    (132
    )
    
    $
    4,584Cost of revenues
    
    
    1,315
    
    
    
    92
    
    
    
    1,407
    
    
    
    2,638
    
    
    
    157
    
    
    
    2,795Gross profit
    
    
    1,025
    
    
    
    (144
    )
    
    
    881
    
    
    
    2,078
    
    
    
    (289
    )
    
    
    1,789Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    424
    
    
    
    26
    
    
    
    450
    
    
    
    933
    
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    942Research and development expense
    
    
    465
    
    
    
    24
    
    
    
    489
    
    
    
    962
    
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    958Amortization of acquired technology and other
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Special charges
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (20
    )
    
    
    (21
    )
    
    
    114
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    122(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    8Operating earnings (loss)
    
    
    141
    
    
    
    (190
    )
    
    
    (49
    )
    
    
    77
    
    
    
    (318
    )
    
    
    (241
    )Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    49
    
    
    
    18
    
    
    
    118
    
    
    
    136Interest expenseLong-term debt
    
    
    (23
    )
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (24
    )
    
    
    (46
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (49
    )Other
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    (9
    )
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    (13
    )Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes, non-controlling interests
and equity in net loss of associated companies
    
    
    151
    
    
    
    (180
    )
    
    
    (29
    )
    
    
    40
    
    
    
    (207
    )
    
    
    (167
    )Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (27
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (27
    )146
    
    
    
    (183
    )
    
    
    (37
    )
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    (207
    )
    
    
    (194
    )Non-controlling interests  net of tax
    
    
    (12
    )
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    (21
    )
    
    
    (25
    )Equity in net loss of associated
companies  net of tax
    
    
    (20
    )
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    (30
    )
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    (25
    )Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
    
    
    114
    
    
    
    (162
    )
    
    
    (48
    )
    
    
    (21
    )
    
    
    (223
    )
    
    
    (244
    )Net earnings (loss) from discontinued
operations  net of tax
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    163
    
    
    
    (38
    )
    
    
    125Net earnings (loss)
    
    
    113
    
    
    
    (169
    )
    
    
    (56
    )
    
    
    142
    
    
    
    (261
    )
    
    
    (119
    )Dividends on preferred shares
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    17Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
    
    $
    106
    
    
    $
    (171
    )
    
    $
    (65
    )
    
    $
    130
    
    
    $
    (266
    )
    
    $
    (136
    )
  The impact of the Second Restatement adjustments for the three months ended June 30,
2003 was an increase to net loss prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP of
$169 and $147, respectively and for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was in increase to
net loss prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP of $261 and $252,
respectively. The Second Restatement adjustments primarily related to the following items,
each of which reflect a number of related adjustments that have been aggregated for
disclosure purposes: revenues and cost of revenues; foreign exchange; intercompany balances;
special charges; other; reclassifications; and discontinued operations. See note 2 for a
description of these differences.The following table presents the impact of the Second Restatement adjustments on Nortel
Networks previously reported consolidated balance sheet prepared in accordance with Canadian
GAAP as of June 30, 2003: 50




---



##### Table of Contents



As previouslyreported
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    As restatedASSETSCurrent assetsCash and cash equivalents
    
    $
    4,118
    
    
    $
    13
    
    
    $
    4,131Restricted cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    115
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    115Accounts receivable  net
    
    
    2,009
    
    
    
    (33
    )
    
    
    1,976Inventories  net
    
    
    879
    
    
    
    558
    
    
    
    1,437Income taxes recoverable
    
    
    57
    
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    111Future income taxes  net
    
    
    399
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    399Other current assets
    
    
    429
    
    
    
    (26
    )
    
    
    403Total current assets
    
    
    8,006
    
    
    
    566
    
    
    
    8,572Investments
    
    
    158
    
    
    
    48
    
    
    
    206Plant and equipment  net
    
    
    1,376
    
    
    
    244
    
    
    
    1,620Goodwill
    
    
    1,112
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    1,111Intangible assets  net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Future income taxes  net
    
    
    3,270
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    3,291Other assets
    
    
    491
    
    
    
    (86
    )
    
    
    405Total assets
    
    $
    14,413
    
    
    $
    792
    
    
    $
    15,205LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYCurrent liabilitiesNotes payable
    
    $
    48
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    48Trade and other accounts payable
    
    
    786
    
    
    
    (81
    )
    
    
    705Payroll and benefit-related liabilities
    
    
    627
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    632Contractual liabilities
    
    
    1,008
    
    
    
    (227
    )
    
    
    781Restructuring
    
    
    299
    
    
    
    (72
    )
    
    
    227Other accrued liabilities
    
    
    2,456
    
    
    
    468
    
    
    
    2,924Long-term debt due within one year
    
    
    184
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    195Total current liabilities
    
    
    5,408
    
    
    
    104
    
    
    
    5,512Long-term debt
    
    
    1,818
    
    
    
    224
    
    
    
    2,042Future income taxes  net
    
    
    464
    
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    447Other liabilities
    
    
    1,528
    
    
    
    383
    
    
    
    1,911Total liabilities
    
    
    9,218
    
    
    
    694
    
    
    
    9,912Minority interests in subsidiary companies
    
    
    125
    
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    108SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYPreferred shares
    
    
    536
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    536Common shares
    
    
    1,794
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,794Contributed surplus
    
    
    22,148
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    22,160Accumulated deficit
    
    
    (19,060
    )
    
    
    (233
    )
    
    
    (19,293
    )Foreign currency translation adjustment
    
    
    (348
    )
    
    
    336
    
    
    
    (12
    )Total shareholders equity
    
    
    5,070
    
    
    
    115
    
    
    
    5,185Total liabilities and shareholders equity
    
    $
    14,413
    
    
    $
    792
    
    
    $
    15,205
 51




---



##### Table of Contents



21.
    
    Supplemental consolidating financial information  As of June 30, 2004 and as a result of Nortel Networks credit ratings, various liens,
pledges and guarantees were effective under security agreements entered into by Nortel Networks
and various of its subsidiaries (see note 10).The security agreements were originally entered into in connection with the $1,510 December 2001
364-day credit facilities (which expired on December 13, 2002). The security became effective
April 4, 2002, following Moodys Investors Service, Inc. (Moodys) downgrade of Nortel
Networks senior long-term debt rating to below investment grade, in respect of the then existing
credit facilities including the Five Year Facilities. Consequently, on April 4, 2002 and in
accordance with the negative pledge covenants in the indentures for all Nortel Networks and
NNCs outstanding public debt securities, all such public debt securities became, under the
terms of the security agreements, secured equally and ratably with the obligations under Nortel
Networks and NNIs then existing credit facilities. Nortel Networks obligations under the EDC
Support Facility became secured on an equal and ratable basis under the security agreements on
February 14, 2003.As a result of Nortel Networks terminating the Five Year Facilities (see note 10), certain
foreign security agreements entered into by Nortel Networks and various of its subsidiaries
under which shares of certain subsidiaries of Nortel Networks incorporated outside of the U.S.
and Canada were pledged in favor of the banks under the Five Year Facilities, EDC and the
holders of Nortel Networks and NNCs outstanding public debt securities also terminated in
accordance with their terms. In addition, guarantees by certain subsidiaries of Nortel Networks
incorporated outside of the U.S. and Canada terminated in accordance with their terms. As of
June 30, 2004, the security agreements pledge substantially all of the assets of Nortel Networks
located in the U.S. and Canada and those of most of its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries,
including the shares of certain of Nortel Networks U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries, in favor of
EDC and the holders of Nortel Networks and NNCs outstanding public debt securities (see note
10). In addition, certain of Nortel Networks wholly owned subsidiaries, including NNI, most of
Nortel Networks Canadian subsidiaries, Nortel Networks (Asia) Limited, Nortel Networks (Ireland)
Limited and Nortel Networks U.K. Limited, have guaranteed Nortel Networks obligations under the
EDC Support Facility and Nortel Networks and NNCs outstanding public debt securities (the
Guarantor Subsidiaries). Non-guarantor subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries)
represented either wholly owned subsidiaries of Nortel Networks whose shares were pledged, or
were the remaining subsidiaries of Nortel Networks which did not provide liens, pledges or
guarantees.If Nortel Networks senior long-term debt rating by Moodys returns to Baa2 (with a stable
outlook) and its rating by Standard & Poors returns to BBB (with a stable outlook), the
security and guarantees will be released in full. If the EDC Support Facility is terminated or
expires, the security and guarantees will also be released in full. Nortel Networks may provide
EDC with cash collateral in an amount equal to the total amount of its outstanding obligations
and undrawn commitments and expenses under the EDC Support Facility (or any other alternative
collateral or arrangements acceptable to EDC) in lieu of the security provided under the
security agreements. Accordingly, if the EDC Support Facility is secured by cash or other
alternate collateral or arrangements acceptable to EDC, the security and guarantees will also be
released in full.The following supplemental consolidating financial data illustrates, in separate columns, the
composition (as described below) of Nortel Networks Limited, the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, eliminations and the consolidated total as of June 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method for purposes of the
supplemental consolidating financial data. Net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries are therefore
reflected in the investment account and net earnings (loss). The principal elimination entries
eliminate investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions. The financial
data may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations or financial position had
the subsidiaries been operating as independent entities. 52




---



##### Table of Contents



Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2004: Nortel
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Non-Networks
    
    
    Guarantor
    
    
    Guarantor(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    Limited
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Eliminations
    
    
    TotalRevenues
    
    $
    766
    
    
    $
    1,803
    
    
    $
    922
    
    
    $
    (901
    )
    
    $
    2,590Cost of revenues
    
    
    521
    
    
    
    1,167
    
    
    
    751
    
    
    
    (901
    )
    
    
    1,538Gross profit
    
    
    245
    
    
    
    636
    
    
    
    171
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,052Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    109
    
    
    
    314
    
    
    
    115
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    538Research and development expense
    
    
    230
    
    
    
    190
    
    
    
    69
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    489Amortization of acquired technology
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2Special charges
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (74
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (75
    )Operating earnings (loss)
    
    
    (95
    )
    
    
    137
    
    
    
    57
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    99Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    (18
    )
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (14
    )Interest expenseLong-term debt
    
    
    (16
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (22
    )Other
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (6
    )Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes, minority interests and equity in
net loss of associated companies
    
    
    (130
    )
    
    
    141
    
    
    
    46
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    57Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (15
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (7
    )(121
    )
    
    
    140
    
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    50Minority interests  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )Equity in
net loss of associated companies  net of tax
    
    
    169
    
    
    
    287
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (449
    )
    
    
    (1
    )Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations  net of tax
    
    
    48
    
    
    
    427
    
    
    
    22
    
    
    
    (449
    )
    
    
    48Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  net of tax
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    6Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    430
    
    
    
    22
    
    
    
    (452
    )
    
    
    54Cumulative effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Net earnings (loss)
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    430
    
    
    
    22
    
    
    
    (452
    )
    
    
    54Dividends on preferred shares
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    7Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
    
    $
    47
    
    
    $
    430
    
    
    $
    22
    
    
    $
    (452
    )
    
    $
    47
 53




---



##### Table of Contents



Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2003: Nortel
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Non-Networks
    
    
    Guarantor
    
    
    Guarantor(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    Limited
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Eliminations
    
    
    TotalRevenues
    
    $
    754
    
    
    $
    1,613
    
    
    $
    794
    
    
    $
    (873
    )
    
    $
    2,288Cost of revenues
    
    
    492
    
    
    
    1,146
    
    
    
    642
    
    
    
    (873
    )
    
    
    1,407Gross profit
    
    
    262
    
    
    
    467
    
    
    
    152
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    881Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    82
    
    
    
    274
    
    
    
    83
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    439Research and development expense
    
    
    209
    
    
    
    220
    
    
    
    72
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    501Amortization of acquired technology
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Special charges
    
    
    32
    
    
    
    (23
    )
    
    
    (31
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (22
    )(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    13Operating earnings (loss)
    
    
    (63
    )
    
    
    (14
    )
    
    
    27
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (50
    )Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    40
    
    
    
    159
    
    
    
    (142
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    57Interest expenseLong-term debt
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (24
    )Other
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (16
    )
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (5
    )Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes, minority interests and equity in
net loss of associated companies
    
    
    (40
    )
    
    
    129
    
    
    
    (111
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (22
    )Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1(33
    )
    
    
    118
    
    
    
    (106
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (21
    )Minority interests  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (8
    )Equity in
net loss of associated companies  net of tax
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    (214
    )
    
    
    (36
    )
    
    
    246
    
    
    
    (3
    )Net earnings
(loss) from continuing operations 
net of tax
    
    
    (32
    )
    
    
    (96
    )
    
    
    (150
    )
    
    
    246
    
    
    
    (32
    )Net earnings
(loss) from discontinued operations 
net of tax
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    (8
    )Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
before cumulative
effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    (40
    )
    
    
    (101
    )
    
    
    (150
    )
    
    
    251
    
    
    
    (40
    )Cumulative effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Net earnings (loss)
    
    
    (40
    )
    
    
    (101
    )
    
    
    (150
    )
    
    
    251
    
    
    
    (40
    )Dividends on preferred shares
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    9Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
    
    $
    (49
    )
    
    $
    (101
    )
    
    $
    (150
    )
    
    $
    251
    
    
    $
    (49
    )
 54




---



##### Table of Contents



Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004: Nortel
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Non-Networks
    
    
    Guarantor
    
    
    Guarantor(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    Limited
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Eliminations
    
    
    TotalRevenues
    
    $
    1,664
    
    
    $
    3,481
    
    
    $
    1,824
    
    
    $
    (1,935
    )
    
    $
    5,034Cost of revenues
    
    
    1,008
    
    
    
    2,355
    
    
    
    1,482
    
    
    
    (1,935
    )
    
    
    2,910Gross profit
    
    
    656
    
    
    
    1,126
    
    
    
    342
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,124Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    213
    
    
    
    644
    
    
    
    219
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,076Research and development expense
    
    
    424
    
    
    
    391
    
    
    
    140
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    955Amortization of acquired technology
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5Special charges
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6(Gain) loss on sale of businesses assets
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (74
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (75
    )Operating earnings (loss)
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    96
    
    
    
    46
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    157Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    81
    
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    74Interest expenseLong-term debt
    
    
    (32
    )
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (13
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (46
    )Other
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (37
    )
    
    
    24
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (14
    )Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes, minority interests and equity in
net loss of associated companies
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    139
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    171Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    46
    
    
    
    (26
    )
    
    
    (18
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    243
    
    
    
    113
    
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    173Minority interests  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (7
    )Equity in
net loss of associated companies  net of tax
    
    
    121
    
    
    
    174
    
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    (291
    )
    
    
    (2
    )Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations  net of tax
    
    
    164
    
    
    
    287
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (291
    )
    
    
    164Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  net of tax
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    7Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    171
    
    
    
    291
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (295
    )
    
    
    171Cumulative effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Net earnings (loss)
    
    
    171
    
    
    
    291
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (295
    )
    
    
    171Dividends on preferred shares
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    16Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
    
    $
    155
    
    
    $
    291
    
    
    $
    4
    
    
    $
    (295
    )
    
    $
    155
 55




---



##### Table of Contents



Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003: Nortel
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Non-Networks
    
    
    Guarantor
    
    
    Guarantor(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    Limited
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Eliminations
    
    
    TotalRevenues
    
    $
    1,623
    
    
    $
    3,263
    
    
    $
    1,494
    
    
    $
    (1,797
    )
    
    $
    4,583Cost of revenues
    
    
    952
    
    
    
    2,545
    
    
    
    1,095
    
    
    
    (1,797
    )
    
    
    2,795Gross profit
    
    
    671
    
    
    
    718
    
    
    
    399
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,788Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    229
    
    
    
    610
    
    
    
    90
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    929Research and development expense
    
    
    402
    
    
    
    432
    
    
    
    144
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    978Amortization of acquired technology
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Special charges
    
    
    64
    
    
    
    60
    
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    118(Gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12Operating earnings (loss)
    
    
    (26
    )
    
    
    (397
    )
    
    
    174
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (249
    )Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    174
    
    
    
    147
    
    
    
    (169
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    152Interest expenseLong-term debt
    
    
    (35
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (14
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (49
    )Other
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (30
    )
    
    
    19
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (13
    )Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes, minority interests and equity in
net loss of associated companies
    
    
    111
    
    
    
    (280
    )
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (159
    )Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    161
    
    
    
    (298
    )
    
    
    141
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4272
    
    
    
    (578
    )
    
    
    151
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (155
    )Minority interests  net of tax
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (25
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (25
    )Equity in
net loss of associated companies  net of tax
    
    
    (485
    )
    
    
    (329
    )
    
    
    (55
    )
    
    
    844
    
    
    
    (25
    )Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations  net of tax
    
    
    (213
    )
    
    
    (907
    )
    
    
    71
    
    
    
    844
    
    
    
    (205
    )Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  net of tax
    
    
    125
    
    
    
    81
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (81
    )
    
    
    125Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    (88
    )
    
    
    (826
    )
    
    
    71
    
    
    
    763
    
    
    
    (80
    )Cumulative effect of accounting change  net of tax
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (12
    )Net earnings (loss)
    
    
    (92
    )
    
    
    (834
    )
    
    
    71
    
    
    
    763
    
    
    
    (92
    )Dividends on preferred shares
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    17Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
    
    $
    (109
    )
    
    $
    (834
    )
    
    $
    71
    
    
    $
    763
    
    
    $
    (109
    )
 56




---



##### Table of Contents



Supplemental Consolidating Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2004: Nortel
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Non-Networks
    
    
    Guarantor
    
    
    Guarantor(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    Limited
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Eliminations
    
    
    TotalASSETSCurrent assetsCash and cash equivalents
    
    $
    40
    
    
    $
    2,595
    
    
    $
    1,012
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    3,647Restricted cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    24
    
    
    
    19
    
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    52Accounts receivable  net
    
    
    411
    
    
    
    1,327
    
    
    
    649
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,387Intercompany/related party accounts receivable
    
    
    429
    
    
    
    1,050
    
    
    
    715
    
    
    
    (1,999
    )
    
    
    195Inventories  net
    
    
    299
    
    
    
    599
    
    
    
    384
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,282Income taxes recoverable
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    83Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    50
    
    
    
    357
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    407Other current assets
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    169
    
    
    
    140
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    329Total current assets
    
    
    1,286
    
    
    
    6,170
    
    
    
    2,925
    
    
    
    (1,999
    )
    
    
    8,382Investments
    
    
    2,080
    
    
    
    (7,196
    )
    
    
    616
    
    
    
    4,656
    
    
    
    156Intercompany advances
    
    
    267
    
    
    
    904
    
    
    
    1,986
    
    
    
    (3,157
    )
    
    
    Plant and equipment  net
    
    
    430
    
    
    
    743
    
    
    
    364
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,537Goodwill
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,957
    
    
    
    164
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,121Intangible assets  net
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    77Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    1,669
    
    
    
    1,543
    
    
    
    60
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,272Other assets
    
    
    77
    
    
    
    47
    
    
    
    183
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    307Total assets
    
    $
    5,847
    
    
    $
    4,169
    
    
    $
    6,336
    
    
    $
    (500
    )
    
    $
    15,852LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYCurrent liabilitiesNotes payable
    
    $
    2
    
    
    $
    3
    
    
    $
    26
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    31Trade and other accounts payable
    
    
    404
    
    
    
    499
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    900Intercompany/related party accounts payable
    
    
    (3,731
    )
    
    
    3,170
    
    
    
    2,560
    
    
    
    (1,999
    )
    
    
    Payroll and benefit-related liabilities
    
    
    96
    
    
    
    267
    
    
    
    122
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    485Contractual liabilities
    
    
    24
    
    
    
    250
    
    
    
    211
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    485Restructuring
    
    
    33
    
    
    
    70
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    124Other accrued liabilities
    
    
    326
    
    
    
    1,486
    
    
    
    604
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,416Long-term debt due within one year
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    21Total current liabilities
    
    
    (2,835
    )
    
    
    5,757
    
    
    
    3,539
    
    
    
    (1,999
    )
    
    
    4,462Long-term debt
    
    
    1,529
    
    
    
    123
    
    
    
    410
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,062Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    130
    
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    162Other liabilities
    
    
    914
    
    
    
    1,717
    
    
    
    212
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,843Intercompany advances
    
    
    
    
    
    
    297
    
    
    
    2,860
    
    
    
    (3,157
    )
    
    
    Total
Liabilities
    
    
    (391
    )
    
    
    8,024
    
    
    
    7,052
    
    
    
    (5,156
    )
    
    
    9,529Minority interests in subsidiary companies
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    85SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYPreferred shares
    
    
    536
    
    
    
    237
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (237
    )
    
    
    536Common shares
    
    
    1,211
    
    
    
    5,417
    
    
    
    1,622
    
    
    
    (7,039
    )
    
    
    1,211Additional paid-in capital
    
    
    22,067
    
    
    
    749
    
    
    
    4,236
    
    
    
    (4,985
    )
    
    
    22,067Accumulated deficit
    
    
    (16,911
    )
    
    
    (10,987
    )
    
    
    (6,839
    )
    
    
    17,826
    
    
    
    (16,911
    )Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    
    
    (665
    )
    
    
    729
    
    
    
    180
    
    
    
    (909
    )
    
    
    (665
    )Total shareholders equity
    
    
    6,238
    
    
    
    (3,855
    )
    
    
    (801
    )
    
    
    4,656
    
    
    
    6,238Total liabilities and shareholders equity
    
    $
    5,847
    
    
    $
    4,169
    
    
    $
    6,336
    
    
    $
    (500
    )
    
    $
    15,852
 57




---



##### Table of Contents



Supplemental Consolidating Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003: Nortel
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Non-Networks
    
    
    Guarantor
    
    
    Guarantor(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    Limited
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Eliminations
    
    
    TotalASSETSCurrent assetsCash and cash equivalents
    
    $
    (8
    )
    
    $
    2,963
    
    
    $
    973
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    3,928Restricted cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    19
    
    
    
    19
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    63Accounts receivable  net
    
    
    314
    
    
    
    1,462
    
    
    
    729
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,505Intercompany/related party accounts receivable
    
    
    345
    
    
    
    1,017
    
    
    
    870
    
    
    
    (2,078
    )
    
    
    154Inventories  net
    
    
    302
    
    
    
    527
    
    
    
    361
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,190Income taxes recoverable
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    52
    
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    90Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    67
    
    
    
    302
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    369Other current assets
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    136
    
    
    
    147
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    314Total current assets
    
    
    1,089
    
    
    
    6,478
    
    
    
    3,124
    
    
    
    (2,078
    )
    
    
    8,613Investments
    
    
    1,995
    
    
    
    (6,801
    )
    
    
    758
    
    
    
    4,292
    
    
    
    244Intercompany advances
    
    
    166
    
    
    
    661
    
    
    
    1,963
    
    
    
    (2,790
    )
    
    
    Plant and equipment  net
    
    
    475
    
    
    
    775
    
    
    
    404
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,654Goodwill
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,956
    
    
    
    169
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,125Intangible assets  net
    
    
    40
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    45
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    86Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    1,673
    
    
    
    1,655
    
    
    
    69
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,397Other assets
    
    
    102
    
    
    
    39
    
    
    
    196
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    337Total assets
    
    $
    5,540
    
    
    $
    4,764
    
    
    $
    6,728
    
    
    $
    (576
    )
    
    $
    16,456LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYCurrent liabilitiesNotes payable
    
    $
    2
    
    
    $
    3
    
    
    $
    12
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    17Trade and other accounts payable
    
    
    347
    
    
    
    378
    
    
    
    135
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    860Intercompany/related party accounts payable
    
    
    (4,071
    )
    
    
    3,217
    
    
    
    2,932
    
    
    
    (2,078
    )
    
    
    Payroll and benefit-related liabilities
    
    
    137
    
    
    
    449
    
    
    
    178
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    764Contractual liabilities
    
    
    26
    
    
    
    272
    
    
    
    231
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    529Restructuring
    
    
    52
    
    
    
    129
    
    
    
    24
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    205Other accrued liabilities
    
    
    356
    
    
    
    1,558
    
    
    
    553
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,467Long-term debt due within one year
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    100
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    119Total current liabilities
    
    
    (3,140
    )
    
    
    6,106
    
    
    
    4,073
    
    
    
    (2,078
    )
    
    
    4,961Long-term debt
    
    
    1,549
    
    
    
    127
    
    
    
    415
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,091Deferred income taxes  net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    143
    
    
    
    47
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    190Other liabilities
    
    
    930
    
    
    
    1,774
    
    
    
    240
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,944Intercompany advances
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    297
    
    
    
    2,482
    
    
    
    (2,790
    )
    
    
    Total
Liabilities
    
    
    (650
    )
    
    
    8,447
    
    
    
    7,257
    
    
    
    (4,868
    )
    
    
    10,186Minority interests in subsidiary companies
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    80
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    80SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYPreferred shares
    
    
    536
    
    
    
    237
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (237
    )
    
    
    536Common shares
    
    
    1,211
    
    
    
    5,416
    
    
    
    1,621
    
    
    
    (7,037
    )
    
    
    1,211Additional paid-in capital
    
    
    22,031
    
    
    
    726
    
    
    
    4,228
    
    
    
    (4,954
    )
    
    
    22,031Accumulated deficit
    
    
    (17,066
    )
    
    
    (10,838
    )
    
    
    (6,684
    )
    
    
    17,522
    
    
    
    (17,066
    )Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    
    
    (522
    )
    
    
    776
    
    
    
    226
    
    
    
    (1,002
    )
    
    
    (522
    )Total shareholders equity
    
    
    6,190
    
    
    
    (3,683
    )
    
    
    (609
    )
    
    
    4,292
    
    
    
    6,190Total liabilities and shareholders equity
    
    $
    5,540
    
    
    $
    4,764
    
    
    $
    6,728
    
    
    $
    (576
    )
    
    $
    16,456
 58




---



##### Table of Contents



Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004: Nortel
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Non-Networks
    
    
    Guarantor
    
    
    Guarantor(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    Limited
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Eliminations
    
    
    TotalCash flows from (used in) operating activitiesNet earnings (loss) from continuing operations
    
    $
    164
    
    
    $
    287
    
    
    $
    4
    
    
    $
    (291
    )
    
    $
    164Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss)
from operations to net cash from (used in)
operating activities, net of effects from
acquisitions and divestitures of businesses:Amortization and depreciation
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    85
    
    
    
    65
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    171Non-cash
portion of special charges and related asset write downs
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Equity in net loss of associated companies
    
    
    (121
    )
    
    
    (174
    )
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    291
    
    
    
    2Current and
deferred stock option compensation
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    36Deferred income taxes
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    (10
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2
    )Other liabilities
    
    
    40
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    113(Gain) loss on repurchases of outstanding
debt securities
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (Gain) loss on sale of investments
and businesses
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (35
    )
    
    
    (74
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (109
    )Other  net
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    (270
    )
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (232
    )Change in operating assets and liabilities
    
    
    (295
    )
    
    
    (27
    )
    
    
    (31
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (353
    )Intercompany/related party activity
    
    
    236
    
    
    
    (199
    )
    
    
    (37
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Net cash from (used in) operating activities
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    (249
    )
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (210
    )Cash flows from (used in) investing activitiesExpenditures for plant and equipment
    
    
    (15
    )
    
    
    (70
    )
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (102
    )Proceeds on disposals of plant and equipment
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    10Acquisitions of investments and businesses
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (6
    ) net of cash acquiredProceeds on sale of investments and businesses
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    55
    
    
    
    76
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    132Net cash from (used in) investing activities
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    (19
    )
    
    
    64
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    34Cash flows from (used in) financing activitiesDividends on preferred shares
    
    
    (16
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (16
    )Increase (decrease) in notes payable  net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    15Repayments of long-term debt
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (85
    )
    
    
    (13
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (98
    )Repayments of capital leases payable
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (7
    )

    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (8
    )Net cash from (used in) financing activities
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    (92
    )
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (107
    )Effect of foreign exchange rate changes
on cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (9
    )Net cash from (used in) continuing operations
    
    
    33
    
    
    
    (364
    )
    
    
    39
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (292
    )Net cash from (used in) discontinued operations
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    11Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
    
    
    48
    
    
    
    (368
    )
    
    
    39
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (281
    )Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    2,963
    
    
    
    973
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,928Cash and cash equivalents
at end of period
    
    $
    40
    
    
    $
    2,595
    
    
    $
    1,012
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    
    $3,647
 59




---



##### Table of Contents



Supplemental Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003: Nortel
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Non-Networks
    
    
    Guarantor
    
    
    Guarantor(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    Limited
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Subsidiaries
    
    
    Eliminations
    
    
    TotalCash flows from (used in) operating activitiesNet earnings (loss) from continuing operations
    
    $
    (213
    )
    
    $
    (907
    )
    
    $
    71
    
    
    $
    844
    
    
    $
    (205
    )Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) from operations to net cash from (used in)
operating activities, net of effects from
acquisitions and divestitures of businesses:Amortization and depreciation
    
    
    47
    
    
    
    114
    
    
    
    52
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    213Non-cash
portion of special charges and related asset write downs
    
    
    67
    
    
    
    (32
    )
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    39Equity in net loss of associated companies
    
    
    485
    
    
    
    329
    
    
    
    55
    
    
    
    (844
    )
    
    
    25Current and
deferred stock option compensation
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12Deferred income taxes
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    23Other liabilities
    
    
    51
    
    
    
    (7
    )
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    47(Gain) loss on repurchases of outstanding
debt securities
    
    
    (4
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (4
    )(Gain) loss on sale of investments
and businesses
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    18
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    21Other  net
    
    
    114
    
    
    
    (317
    )
    
    
    (126
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (329
    )Change in operating assets and liabilities
    
    
    183
    
    
    
    58
    
    
    
    68
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    309Intercompany/related party activity
    
    
    (955
    )
    
    
    1,289
    
    
    
    (334
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Net cash from (used in) operating activities
    
    
    (218
    )
    
    
    567
    
    
    
    (198
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    151Cash flows from (used in) investing activitiesExpenditures for plant and equipment
    
    
    (18
    )
    
    
    (26
    )
    
    
    (20
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (64
    )Proceeds on disposals of plant and equipment
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    21Acquisitions of investments and businesses
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2
    ) net of cash acquiredInvestments in subsidiaries
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    8Net cash from (used in) investing activities
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    (9
    )
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (37
    )Cash flows from (used in) financing activitiesDividends on preferred shares
    
    
    (17
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (17
    )Increase (decrease) in notes payable  net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    (18
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (14
    )Repayments of long-term debt
    
    
    (34
    )
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    (61
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (94
    )Repayments of capital leases payable
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (6
    )Net cash from (used in) financing activities
    
    
    (51
    )
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (79
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (131
    )Effect of foreign exchange rate changes
on cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    42
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    78Net cash from (used in) continuing operations
    
    
    (279
    )
    
    
    599
    
    
    
    (259
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    61Net cash from (used in) discontinued operations
    
    
    66
    
    
    
    257
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    324Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
    
    
    (213
    )
    
    
    856
    
    
    
    (258
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    385Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period
    
    
    251
    
    
    
    2,177
    
    
    
    1,314
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,742Cash and cash equivalents
at end of period
    
    $
    38
    
    
    $
    3,033
    
    
    $
    1,056
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    4,127
 60




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 2.
    
    Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations  Table of Contents Business overview
    
    
    63Our business
    
    
    63Our segments
    
    
    63Our business environment
    
    
    64How we measure performance
    
    
    65Our strategic plan and outlook
    
    
    66Developments in 2004
    
    
    67First half consolidated results summary
    
    
    67Nortel Networks Audit Committee Independent Review; restatements; related matters
    
    
    68Comprehensive Review and First Restatement
    
    
    68Independent Review
    
    
    68Second Restatement
    
    
    68Material weaknesses in internal control over financial
reporting identified in Second Restatement
    
    
    71Revenue Independent Review
    
    
    72Personnel actions
    
    
    72EDC Support Facility
    
    
    72Credit facilities and security agreements
    
    
    73Debt securities
    
    
    73Shelf registration statement
    
    
    73Credit ratings
    
    
    74Regulatory actions and pending litigation
    
    
    74Stock-based compensation plans
    
    
    74Evolution of our supply chain strategy
    
    
    74Other business developments
    
    
    75Customer financing commitments
    
    
    75Sale of Entrust shares
    
    
    75Real estate
    
    
    75Customer contract settlement
    
    
    76Directory and operator services business
    
    
    76Bharat Sanchar Nigram Limited contract
    
    
    76Patent infringement settlement
    
    
    76Customer financing arrangements
    
    
    76Joint Ventures
    
    
    76Results of operations  continuing operations
    
    
    76Segment revenues
    
    
    76Geographic revenues
    
    
    77Consolidated revenues
    
    
    77Wireless Networks revenues
    
    
    79Enterprise Networks revenues
    
    
    81Wireline Networks revenues
    
    
    83Optical Networks revenues
    
    
    84Gross profit and gross margin
    
    
    86Segment gross profit and gross margin
    
    
    86Operating expenses
    
    
    87Selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    87Segment selling, general and administrative expense
    
    
    87Research and development expense
    
    
    88Segment research and development expense
    
    
    88Segment Management EBT
    
    
    89Special charges
    
    
    89
 61




---



##### Table of Contents



Gain (loss) on sale of businesses and assets
    
    
    90Other income (expense)  net
    
    
    91Interest expense
    
    
    91Income tax benefit (expense)
    
    
    91Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
    
    
    91Results of operations  discontinued operations
    
    
    91Liquidity and capital resources
    
    
    92Cash flows
    
    
    92Uses of liquidity
    
    
    93Contractual cash obligations
    
    
    94Customer financing
    
    
    94Discontinued operations
    
    
    95Sources of liquidity
    
    
    95Credit facilities
    
    
    95Available support facility
    
    
    95Shelf registration statement and base shelf prospectus
    
    
    96Credit ratings
    
    
    97Off-balance sheet arrangements
    
    
    97Bid, performance related and other bonds
    
    
    97Receivables securitization and certain lease financing transactions
    
    
    98Other indemnifications or guarantees
    
    
    98Application of critical accounting estimates
    
    
    99Provisions for doubtful accounts
    
    
    99Provisions for inventory
    
    
    100Tax asset valuation
    
    
    101Accounting changes and recent accounting pronouncements
    
    
    101Accounting changes
    
    
    101Recent accounting pronouncements
    
    
    102Canadian supplement
    
    
    103Market risk
    
    
    103Equity price risk
    
    
    104Legal proceedings
    
    
    104Risk factors/forward looking statements
    
    
    104Risks relating to our restatements and related matters
    
    
    105Risks relating to our business
    
    
    112
 62




---



##### Table of Contents



Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations You should read this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operation, or MD&A, in combination with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States, or U.S. GAAP. As discussed herein, this MD&A gives effect to the Second Restatement as
described below in Developments in 2004  Nortel Networks Audit Committee Independent Review;
restatements; related matters and in Restatement in note 2 of the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements. A number of our and Nortel Networks Corporations past filings
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, remain subject to ongoing review
by the SECs Division of Corporation Finance. In addition, the Second Restatement involved the
restatement of our consolidated financial statements for 2001 and 2002 and the first, second and
third quarters of 2003. Amendments to our prior filings with the SEC would be required in order for
us to be in full compliance with our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act. However, we do
not believe that it will be feasible to amend our Annual Report onForm 10-K/Afor the year ended
December 31, 2002, or 2002Form 10-K/A,and our 2003Form 10-Qs, due to, among other factors,
identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, the significant
turnover in our finance personnel, changes in accounting systems, documentation weaknesses, a
likely inability to obtain third party corroboration in certain cases due to the substantial
industry adjustment in recent years and the passage of time generally. In addition, disclosure in
the 2002Form 10-K/Aand 2003Form 10-Qswould in large part repeat the disclosure contained in our
Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2003, or the 2003 Annual Report, and
this report and expected to be contained in the other 2004Form 10-Qs. Accordingly, we do not plan
to amend our 2002Form 10-K/Aand 2003Form 10-Qs. We believe that we have included in the 2003
Form 10-K and in this report all information needed for current investor understanding. Ongoing SEC
review may require us to amend this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qor our other public filings
further. See Risk factors/ forward looking statements. This section contains forward looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the risk
factors described below under Risk factors/ forward looking statements. All dollar amounts in
this MD&A are in millions of United States, or U.S., dollars unless otherwise stated. Where we say we, us, our or Nortel Networks, we mean Nortel Networks Limited or Nortel
Networks Limited and its subsidiaries, as applicable, and where we refer to the industry, we mean
the telecommunications industry. Business overview Our business Nortel Networks is a recognized leader in delivering communications capabilities that enhance
the human experience, ignite and power global commerce, and secure and protect the worlds most
critical information. Serving both service provider and enterprise customers, we deliver innovative
technology solutions encompassing end-to-end broadband, Voice over IP, multimedia services and
applications, and wireless broadband solutions designed to help people solve the worlds greatest
challenges. Our business consists of the design, development, manufacture, assembly, marketing,
sale, licensing, installation, servicing and support of these networking solutions. A substantial
portion of our business has a technology focus and is dedicated to research and development, or
R&D. This focus forms a core strength and is a factor that we believe differentiates us from many
of our competitors. We envision a networked society where people are able to connect and interact
with information and with each other instantly, simply and reliably, accessing data, voice and
multimedia communications services and sharing experiences anywhere, anytime. We are the principal direct operating subsidiary of Nortel Networks Corporation, or NNC. NNC holds
all of our outstanding common shares but none of our outstanding preferred shares. NNCs common
shares are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, and Toronto Stock Exchange, or
TSX, under the symbol NT. Our segments During 2003 and up to September 30, 2004, our operations were organized into four reportable
segments as follows:  
    
    Wireless Networks  Our Wireless Networks segment provides communications networks that
enable end-users to be mobile while they send and receive voice and data communications
using wireless devices, such as cellular telephones, personal digital assistants and other
computing and communications devices. Our Wireless Networks 63




---



##### Table of Contents



customers are wireless service providers, and their customers are the subscribers for
wireless communications services.
    
    Enterprise Networks  Our Enterprise Networks segment provides data, voice and
multimedia communications solutions for our enterprise customers. Our Enterprise Networks
customers consist of a broad range of enterprise customers around the world, including
large businesses and their branch offices, small businesses and home offices, as well as
government agencies, educational and other institutions and utility organizations.
    
    Wireline Networks  Our Wireline Networks segment addresses the demand by our service
provider customers for cost efficient data, voice and multimedia communications solutions.
We offer our Wireline Networks products and services to a wide range of wireline and
wireless service providers around the world. Our service provider customers include local
and long distance telephone companies, wireless service providers, cable operators and
other communication service providers. We also provide services to our data networking and
security customers which consist of system integrators that in turn build, operate and
manage networks for their customers, such as businesses, government agencies and utility
organizations.
    
    Optical Networks  Our Optical Networks segment solutions transport data, voice and
multimedia communications within and between cities, countries or continents by
transmitting communications signals in the form of light waves through fiber optic cables.
Our Optical Networks business is primarily focused on offering our optical networking
solutions to service providers around the world. The service provider customers for our
optical networking products include local and long-distance telephone companies, cable
operators, Internet service providers and other communications service providers. Effective October 1, 2004, we established a new streamlined organizational structure that included,
among other things, combining the businesses of our four segments into two business organizations:
(i) Carrier Networks and Global Operations, and (ii) Enterprise Networks. We are reviewing the
impact of these changes on our reportable segments under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards, or SFAS, No. 131, Disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information. Our business environment In 2001, we entered into an unprecedented period of business realignment in response to a
significant adjustment in the industry. Industry demand for networking equipment dramatically
declined in response to the industry adjustment, severe economic downturns in various regions
around the world and a tightening in global capital markets. We implemented a company-wide
restructuring plan to streamline our operations and activities around core markets and operations,
which included significant workforce reductions, global real estate closures and dispositions,
substantial write-downs of our capital assets, goodwill and other intangible assets and extensive
contract settlements with customers and suppliers around the world. As a result of these actions,
our workforce declined significantly from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003 and over the same
time period, we significantly reduced our facilities. In 2003, customer spending remained cautious
as a result of tightened capital markets mainly in the first half of 2003 and customers realigning
capital spending with their current levels of revenues and profits in order to maximize their
return on invested capital. We experienced continued industry adjustment and capital spending
restrictions by our service provider customers. Also, excess network capacity and competition
continued to exist in the industry which led to continued pricing pressures on the sale of certain
of our products. During the second half of 2003 and in 2004, we began to experience a period of relative industry
stability. Throughout the second half of 2003 and in 2004, we announced several new contracts
across all of our reportable segments, but primarily in our Wireless Networks segment, as certain
service provider customers began to expand and upgrade their existing networks. In 2004, however,
we continued to experience pricing pressures on sales of certain products across all of our
reportable segments primarily as a result of increased competition. As first announced on August 19, 2004, we have put in place a new strategic plan that recognizes
these industry dynamics and the evolution of the converged network (see Business overview  Our
strategic plan and outlook). In an increasingly cost-competitive environment, we are taking
steps that we believe will better position us to grow market share and improve our results and cash
generation. As part of our strategic plan, we also announced a focused workforce reduction of
approximately 3,250 employees. In May 2003, we commenced certain balance sheet reviews at the direction of certain members of
former management that led to a comprehensive review and analysis of our assets and liabilities, or
the Comprehensive Review, which resulted in the restatement (effected in December 2003) of our
consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and for the
quarters ended March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003, or the First Restatement. In late October 2003,
the Audit Committees of our and NNCs Boards of Directors, or the Audit Committee, initiated an
independent review of the facts and circumstances leading to the First Restatement, or the
Independent Review, and engaged the law firm now known as Wilmer
Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, or WCPHD, to advise it in connection with the
Independent Review. 64




---



##### Table of Contents



The Audit Committee sought to gain a full understanding of the events that
caused significant excess liabilities to be maintained on the balance sheet that needed to be
restated, and to recommend that our Board of Directors adopt, and direct management to implement,
necessary remedial measures to address personnel, controls, compliance and discipline. In January
2005, the Audit Committee reported the findings of the Independent Review, together with its
recommendations for governing principles for remedial measures that were developed for the Audit
Committee by WCPHD. Each of our and NNCs Boards of Directors has adopted these recommendations in
their entirety and directed our management to develop a detailed plan and timetable for their
implementation, and will monitor their implementation. The Summary of Findings of Recommended
Remedial Measures of the Independent Review is set forth in full in Item 9A of our and NNCs 2003
Annual Reports on Form 10-K, or the 2003 Annual Reports. As the Independent Review progressed, the Audit Committee directed new corporate management to
examine in depth the concerns identified by WCPHD regarding provisioning activity and to review
certain provision releases. That examination, and other errors identified by management, led to the
restatement (effected with the filing of the 2003 Annual Reports) of our financial statements for
the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the quarters ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, June 30,
2003 and 2002 and September 30, 2003 and 2002, or the Second Restatement, and our revision of
previously announced unaudited results for the year ended December 31, 2003. The need for the
Second Restatement resulted in delays in filing the 2003 Annual Reports and our and NNCs Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q for the first, second and third quarters of 2004, or the 2004 Quarterly
Reports, beyond the SECs required filing dates in 2004. We refer to the 2003 Annual Reports and
the 2004 Quarterly Reports together as the Reports. Over the course of the Second Restatement process, management identified certain accounting
practices that it determined should be adjusted as part of the Second Restatement. In particular,
management identified certain errors related to revenue recognition and undertook a process of
revenue reviews. As described in more detail in the Controls and Procedures section of this
report, in light of the resulting adjustments to revenues previously reported in relevant periods,
the Audit Committee has determined to review the facts and circumstances leading to the restatement
of these revenues for specific transactions identified in the Second Restatement. This review will
have a particular emphasis on the underlying conduct that led to the initial recognition of these
revenues. The Audit Committee will seek a full understanding of the historic events that required
the revenues for these specific transactions to be restated and will consider any appropriate
additional remedial measures, including those involving internal controls and processes. The Audit
Committee has engaged WCPHD to advise it in connection with this review. See Risk factors/forward
looking statements. Over the course of the Second Restatement process, we and our independent auditors identified a
number of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Further, in
connection with the Independent Review, we terminated for cause our former president and chief
executive officer, former chief financial officer and former controller in April 2004 and seven
additional senior finance employees with significant responsibilities for our financial reporting
as a whole or for their respective business units and geographic areas in August 2004. We are
subject to significant pending civil litigation and ongoing regulatory and criminal investigations
in the U.S. and Canada, which could require us to pay substantial judgments, settlements, fines or
other penalties. We are currently in a challenging transitional period in connection with the completion of our
restatement activity and as we implement the new strategic plan. We believe that our strategic plan
will enable us to build on our market leadership in developing the converged networks of the future
and improve business efficiency and operating cost performance in an increasingly competitive
market. On January 27, 2005, we announced the appointment of Peter Currie as our chief financial officer
effective February 14, 2005. Our current chief financial officer, William Kerr, will serve as a
senior advisor to our president and chief executive officer assisting Peter Currie in the
transition to his role and the ongoing transformation of our finance organization as well as
make a strategic contribution to plans for market expansion and growth. We further announced the
appointment of Karen Sledge as controller on an interim basis effective February 7, 2005. Our
current controller, MaryAnne Pahapill, has accepted a financial position outside Nortel Networks.
We have initiated a search process to fill the controller position permanently. How we measure performance Each reportable segment is allocated resources and assets based on whether projected customer
demand would support additional investment. We make adjustments to reduce resources and assets
within a reportable segment in response to market conditions or where opportunities for improved
efficiencies present themselves. 65




---



##### Table of Contents



Our president and chief executive officer, or CEO, has been identified as the chief operating
decision maker in assessing the performance of the segments and the allocation of resources to the
segments. Each reportable segment is managed separately with each segment manager reporting
directly to the CEO. The CEO relies on the information derived directly from our management
reporting system. In April 2004, our and NNCs boards of directors appointed a new CEO.
Commencing in the second quarter of 2004, the primary financial measure used by the CEO in
assessing performance and allocating resources to the segments is management earnings (loss) before
income taxes, or Management EBT, a measure that includes the cost of revenues and selling, general
and administrative expense, or SG&A, R&D expense, interest expense, other income (expense)  net,
minority interests  net of tax and equity in net loss of associated companies  net of tax. This
primary financial measure replaced contribution margin, the previously disclosed primary financial
measure used for earlier periods. Contribution margin differs from Management EBT in that it
excludes R&D expense, interest expense, other income (expense)  net, minority interest  net of
tax and equity in net loss of associated companies  net of tax. See Segment information -
General description in note 5 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. From a liquidity perspective, we maintain strict controls over our sources and uses of cash. We
also focus on the liquidity and cash flows of our customers in an effort to minimize our credit
risk. We closely monitor our inventory levels, both in our manufacturing facilities as well as at
our contract manufacturers, in an effort to minimize our exposure to excess supply and subsequent
cash costs incurred as a result of excess capacity. Our strategic plan and outlook On August 19, 2004, we announced a new strategic plan intended to enable us to build on our
market leadership in developing the converged networks of the future and improve business
efficiency and operating cost performance in an increasingly competitive market. We provided
further details concerning the strategic plan on September 30, 2004 and December 14, 2004. It is
our intention to be optimally positioned to maximize strategic opportunities as they arise and
leverage our acknowledged strengths in high reliability networks and strong customer loyalty. We
continue to drive our business forward with a focus on costs, cash and revenues as strategic goals.
We remain committed to our business strategy of technology and solutions evolution in helping our
customers transform their networks and implement new applications and services to drive improved
productivity, reduced costs and revenue growth. The principal components of the strategic plan are:  
    
    a renewed commitment to best corporate practices and ethical conduct, including the
establishment of the office of a chief ethics and compliance officer, which has been filled
on an interim basis pending the permanent appointment of Susan E. Shepard, effective
February 21, 2005;
    
    a streamlined organizational structure to reflect alignment with carrier converged networks;
    
    an increased focus on the enterprise market and customers;
    
    optimized R&D programs for highly secure, available and reliable converged networks;
    
    the establishment of a chief strategy officer to drive partnerships, new markets and acquisitions;
    
    the establishment of a chief marketing officer to drive overall marketing strategy;
    
    the strategic review of embedded services to assess opportunities in the professional services business; and
    
    a distinct focus on government and defense customers. Our strategic plan also includes a work plan involving focused workforce reductions of
approximately 3,250 employees, a voluntary retirement program, real estate optimization and other
cost containment actions such as reductions in information services costs, outsourced services and
other discretionary spending. Our workforce actions are focused to disproportionately protect
customer and sales facing roles as well as continue our focus on new innovative solutions.
Approximately 64% of employee actions related to the focused workforce reduction were completed by
the end of 2004, including approximately 55% that were notified of termination or acceptance of
voluntary retirement, with the remainder comprised of voluntary attrition of employees that were
not replaced. The remainder of employee actions are expected to be completed by June 30, 2005. In
addition, however, the Company continues to hire in certain strategic areas such as investments in
the finance organization. These focused headcount reductions are intended to result in ongoing cost
reductions in R&D and SG&A expenses and cost of sales. These actions are subject to the completion
of required jurisdictional consultation and regulatory approvals. This workforce reduction is in
addition to the workforce reduction that will result from our agreement with Flextronics
International Ltd., or Flextronics (for more information, see Evolution of our supply chain
strategy). We expect the real estate actions to be completed by the end of 2005. 66




---



##### Table of Contents



We estimate charges to the income statement associated with our overall work plan in the aggregate
of approximately $450 comprised of approximately $220 with respect to the workforce reductions and
approximately $230 with respect to the real estate actions. No charges are expected to be recorded
with respect to the other cost containment actions. Approximately 25% of the aggregate income
statement charges were incurred in 2004 with the remainder expected to be incurred in 2005. The associated cash costs of the work plan of approximately $430 are expected to be split
approximately equally between the workforce reductions and real estate actions. Approximately 10%
of these cash costs were incurred in 2004 and approximately 40% are expected to be incurred in
2005. The remaining 50% of the cash costs relates to the real estate actions and are expected be
incurred in 2006 through to 2022 for ongoing lease costs related to impacted real estate
facilities. In addition to the above, we also expect to incur capital cash costs of approximately $50 in 2005
for facility improvements related to the real estate actions. We anticipate cost savings from the implementation of the work plan of approximately $500 in 2005,
which is expected to increase on an annualized basis beyond 2005 as the full impact of the work
plan is realized. We expect that this work plan will primarily be funded with cash from
operations. We expect that our consolidated revenues in 2004 will be slightly lower compared with 2003. The
2003 consolidated revenues included revenues that were deferred from prior periods. We see growth
opportunities in emerging markets such as China and India. Further, we believe security and
reliability for service provider networks are increasingly important to governments, defense
interests and enterprises around the world. Developments in 2004 First half consolidated results summary In the second quarter of 2004, our consolidated revenues were $2,590 compared to $2,288 in the
second quarter of 2003 and $5,034 in the first half of 2004 compared to $4,583 in the first half of
2003. In the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003, revenues in Wireline
Networks decreased 10% and Optical Networks decreased 3% while revenues in Wireless Networks
increased 32% and Enterprise Networks increased 11%. In the first half of 2004 compared to the
first half of 2003, revenues in Wireline Networks decreased 13%, Optical Networks decreased 13%
while Wireless Networks increased 36% and Enterprise Networks
increased 1%. Our gross margin increased to
41% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to 39% in the second
quarter of 2003 and increased to 42% in the first half of 2004 compared to 39% in the first half of
2003. SG&A expense increased 23% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of
2003 and increased 16% in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003. R&D expense
decreased slightly in both the second quarter of 2004 and in the first half of 2004 compared to the
same periods in 2003. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to increased employee related
expenses and unfavorable foreign exchange rate fluctuation impacts associated with the Canadian
dollar, euro and British pound. R&D expense decreased slightly due to the continued impact of our
workforce reductions partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange impacts. Our levels of R&D
spending are commensurate with our technology focus and commitment to invest in next-generation
solutions. Special charges declined in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter
of 2003, primarily as a result of our completion of a substantial portion of activities associated
with our restructuring work plan initiated in 2001. These activities included workforce
reductions, contract settlements and facility closures. Our discontinued operations reported net earnings of $6 in the second quarter of 2004 compared to a
net loss of $8 in the second quarter of 2003 and net earnings of $7 in the first half of 2004
compared to net earnings of $125 in the first half of 2003 reflecting the continued wind-down
activities of our discontinued operations. We reported net earnings before cumulative effect of accounting change of $54 in the second quarter
of 2004 and $171 in the first half of 2004 compared to net loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change of $40 in the second quarter of 2003 and $80 in the first half of 2003. In the first half of 2004, our cash and cash equivalents, or cash, decreased $281 from $3,928 to
$3,647 as of June 30, 2004. The decrease was due to $210 of net cash used in our operating
activities, unfavorable foreign exchange impacts of $9 and decrease of $107 used in our financing
activities. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in cash of $34 from our investing
activities and net cash of $11 from our discontinued operations. 67




---



##### Table of Contents



Nortel Networks Audit Committee Independent Review; restatements; related matters  Comprehensive Review and First Restatement In May 2003, we commenced certain balance sheet reviews at the direction of certain members of
former management that led to the Comprehensive Review, which resulted in the First Restatement.
See notes 2 and 19 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and the
Controls and Procedures section of this report. In connection with the Comprehensive Review, Deloitte & Touche LLP, or D&T, our independent
auditors, informed the Audit Committee on July 24, 2003 of a reportable condition that did not
constitute a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting (throughout this
report, unless otherwise indicated, reportable condition and material weakness have the
meanings as formerly set forth under standards established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, or AICPA). Later, on November 18, 2003, as part of the communications by D&T
to the Audit Committee with respect to D&Ts interim audit procedures for the year ended December
31, 2003, D&T informed the Audit Committee that it had identified certain reportable conditions,
each of which constituted a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.
These material weaknesses identified in the First Restatement were also later identified in
connection with the Second Restatement together with certain additional material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting, as described in greater detail in the Controls and
Procedures section of this report.  Independent Review In late October 2003, the Audit Committee initiated the Independent Review and engaged WCPHD
to advise it in connection with the Independent Review in order to gain a full understanding of the
events that caused significant excess liabilities to be maintained on the balance sheet that needed
to be restated, and to recommend that our Board of Directors adopt, and direct management to
implement, necessary remedial measures to address personnel, controls, compliance and discipline.
The Independent Review focused initially on events relating to the establishment and release of
contractual liability and other related provisions (also called accruals, reserves, or accrued
liabilities) in the second half of 2002 and the first half of 2003, including the involvement of
senior corporate leadership. As the Independent Review evolved, its focus broadened to include
specific provisioning activities in each of the business units and geographic regions. In light of
concerns raised in the initial phase of the Independent Review, the Audit Committee expanded the
review to include provisioning activities in the third and fourth quarters of 2003. As discussed more fully in the Controls and Procedures section of this report, the Independent
Review concluded that [i]n summary, former corporate management (now terminated for cause) and
former finance management (now terminated for cause) in the Companys finance organization
endorsed, and employees carried out, accounting practices relating to the recording and release of
provisions that were not in compliance with [U.S. GAAP] in at least four quarters, including the
third and fourth quarters of 2002 and the first and second quarters of 2003. In three of those
four quarters  when Nortel was at, or close to, break even  these practices were undertaken to
meet internally imposed . . . targets. While the dollar value of most of the individual provisions
was relatively small, the aggregate value of the provisions made the difference between a profit
and a reported loss, on a pro forma basis, in the fourth quarter of 2002 and the difference between
a loss and a reported profit, on a pro forma basis, in the first and second quarters of 2003.  Second Restatement As the Independent Review progressed, the Audit Committee directed new corporate management to
examine in depth the concerns identified by WCPHD regarding provisioning activity and to review
provision releases, down to a low threshold. That examination, and other errors identified by
management, led to the Second Restatement. Over the course of the Second Restatement process, management identified certain accounting
practices that it determined should be adjusted as part of the Second Restatement. In particular,
management identified certain errors related to revenue recognition and undertook a process of
revenue reviews, resulting in adjustments to previously reported revenues during the periods 1998
through 2003. Other accounting practices that management examined and adjusted as part of the
Second Restatement included, among other things, the following:  
    
    intercompany balances that did not eliminate upon consolidation and related provisions;
    
    our foreign exchange accounting, as part of our plan to address an identified material
weakness related to foreign currency translation; 68




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    special charges relating to inventory impairment, contract settlement costs and other charges; and
    
    the accounting treatment of certain elements of discontinued operations.  Three and six months ended June 30, 2003 The following table presents the impact of the Second Restatement adjustments on our previously
reported consolidated statement of operations data for the three and six months ended June 30,
2003. The Second Restatement adjustments related primarily to the following items, each of which
reflect a number of related adjustments that have been aggregated for disclosure purposes, and are
described in the paragraphs following the table below. See Restatement in note 2 of the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements.  
    
    revenues and cost of revenues;
    
    foreign exchange;
    
    intercompany balances;
    
    special charges;
    
    other;
    
    reclassifications; and
    
    discontinued operations. Consolidated Statement of Operations data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 Three months ended June 30, 2003
    
    
    Six months ended June 30, 2003(millions of U.S. dollars)
    
    As previouslyreported
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    As restated
    
    
    As previouslyreported
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    As restatedRevenues
    
    $
    2,340
    
    
    $
    (52
    )
    
    $
    2,288
    
    
    $
    4,716
    
    
    $
    (133
    )
    
    $
    4,583Gross profit
    
    
    1,023
    
    
    
    (142
    )
    
    
    881
    
    
    
    2,075
    
    
    
    (287
    )
    
    
    1,788Operating earnings (loss)
    
    
    143
    
    
    
    (193
    )
    
    
    (50
    )
    
    
    73
    
    
    
    (322
    )
    
    
    (249
    )Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
minority interests and equity in net loss of associated companies
    
    
    143
    
    
    
    (165
    )
    
    
    (22
    )
    
    
    48
    
    
    
    (207
    )
    
    
    (159
    )Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
    
    
    109
    
    
    
    (141
    )
    
    
    (32
    )
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    (211
    )
    
    
    (205
    )Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations  net of tax
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    162
    
    
    
    (37
    )
    
    
    125Net earnings (loss)
    
    
    107
    
    
    
    (147
    )
    
    
    (40
    )
    
    
    160
    
    
    
    (252
    )
    
    
    (92
    )Dividends on preferred shares
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    5
    
    
    
    17Net earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
    
    $
    100
    
    
    $
    (149
    )
    
    $
    (49
    )
    
    $
    148
    
    
    $
    (257
    )
    
    $
    (109
    )
  Revenues and cost of revenues Revenues and cost of revenues were impacted by various errors related to revenue recognition,
corrections to foreign exchange accounting, intercompany related items and other adjustments,
including financial statement reclassifications. The net impact to revenues of the adjustments was
a decrease of $52 and $133 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. The net
impact to cost of revenues related to these revenue adjustments, and the other corrections was an
increase of $90 and $154 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. The
Second Restatement adjustments to revenues and cost of revenues related primarily to the following
items:  
    
    incorrect application of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin, or SAB, No. 104, Revenue
Recognition (preceded by SAB 101), or SAB 104, or AICPA Statement of Position, or SOP,
97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, or SOP 97-2, the most significant of which related
to revenue that should have been deferred until title or risk of loss had passed, or
products had been delivered;
    
    incorrect application of SOP 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type
and Certain Production-Type Contracts, or SOP 81-1, with respect to
percentage-of-completion accounting for certain long-term construction contracts;
    
    corrections to defer revenue for a specific transaction until
contract execution occurred; and
    
    various other adjustments included corrections primarily related to an overstatement of
revenues and cost of revenues as a result of two specific transactions recorded
in the first quarter of 2003 which should have been recorded in 2002. In addition, other revenue
recognition adjustments were made which relate to a specific contract in the Caribbean and 69




---



##### Table of Contents



Latin America, or CALA, region, other errors related to non-cash incentives and
concessions provided to customers and other calculation errors.  Foreign exchange As part of the plan to address a material weakness reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2003, a review of foreign exchange accounting was undertaken.
The net impact to pre-tax loss was a decrease of $7 and $97 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2003, respectively. The significant items were as follows:  
    
    we re-examined the determination of the functional currency for certain entities
based on the guidance under SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation, or SFAS No.
52. As a result, we identified four instances in which the functional currency
designation of an entity was incorrect. These revisions resulted in increases or
decreases to other income (expense)  net;
    
    we identified two instances of incorrect treatment of significant intercompany
positions. The net impact of the adjustments was an increase or decrease to other
income (expense)  net, with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive loss;
    
    we identified errors in the revaluation of certain foreign denominated customer
financing provisions within discontinued operations, the correction of which increased
other income and decreased net earnings from discontinued operations; and
    
    we identified errors related to translation of foreign denominated intercompany
transactions, revaluation of certain foreign denominated intercompany transactions and
accounting for mark-to-market adjustments for foreign exchange contracts as required
under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, or
SFAS No. 133.  Intercompany balances Historically, we had certain intercompany balances that did not eliminate upon consolidation, or
out-of-balance positions, and provisions had been recorded accordingly. As part of the Second
Restatement, we reviewed these provisions and determined that they should not have been recorded.
We recorded adjustments in the appropriate periods to reverse these provisions and to correct the
significant out-of-balance positions. The adjustments to reverse the provisions affected the
second quarter of 2003 and periods prior to 2000. The net impact was an increase of $15 and $21 to pre-tax loss for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.  Special charges As part of the Second Restatement, we re-examined the components of special charges, and recorded a
decrease of $21 and an increase of $8 to special charges for the three and six months ended June
30, 2003, respectively. We determined that certain items were either recorded in special charges
in error or, although correctly recorded when originally recognized, were not adjusted in the
appropriate subsequent periods for changes in estimates and/or assumptions. These items related to
contract settlement costs, including real estate related items, severance and fringe benefit
related costs and plant and equipment impairment costs.  Other We recorded other adjustments primarily to correct certain accruals, provisions or other
transactions, which were either initially recorded incorrectly in prior periods, or not properly
released or adjusted for changes in estimates and/or assumptions in the appropriate subsequent
periods. The impact of these adjustments was an increase to pre-tax loss of $97 and $107 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, and included tax and minority interests impacts of all
Second Restatement adjustments. The adjustment to income tax benefit was an increase of $3 and $12 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2003, respectively, primarily related to investment tax credits and taxes
attributable to preferred share dividends. The adjustment to minority interests as a result of the
Second Restatement adjustments was a decrease of $4 and an increase of $21 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. 70




---



##### Table of Contents



Reclassifications As a result of the restatement process, various presentation inconsistencies were identified.
Adjustments were made to appropriately reflect certain items in the consolidated statement of
operations. The reclassifications were made for royalty expense, gain (loss) on sale of businesses
and assets and other items including
certain functional spending and specific expenses.  Discontinued operations As a result of the restatement process, we re-examined the initial provision for loss on disposal
of the access solutions discontinued operations recorded in June 2001, and the subsequent activity
during 2001 through 2004. We concluded that the net loss on disposal of operations recognized in
the second quarter of 2001 was overstated. In addition, other adjustments were necessary to
correct certain items that were either initially recorded incorrectly, or not properly released or
adjusted for changes in estimates in the appropriate periods subsequent to the second quarter of
2001. The net impact of the adjustments was a $6 increase to the previously reported net loss from
discontinued operations  net of tax for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and a $37 decrease to
previously reported net earnings from discontinued operations  net of tax for the six months ended
June 30, 2003. For the three months ended June 30, 2003, the $6 increase to net loss from discontinued operations
consisted primarily of increases of approximately $12 resulting from additional provisions related
to discontinued operations and approximately $9 related to the revaluation of certain foreign
denominated customer financing provisions, partially offset by a $17 net decrease from adjustments
to contingent liabilities. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the $37 decrease to net
earnings from discontinued operations consisted primarily of a decrease of approximately $90
resulting from the elimination of a gain on redemption of an investment interest due to the
reversal in an earlier period of a full valuation allowance that had been recorded against the
investment interest when acquired, a decrease of approximately $39 related to the revaluation of
certain foreign denominated customer financing provisions and a net decrease of $12 resulting from
additional provisions related to discontinued operations, partially offset by an increase of $37
for corrections to accrued liabilities, a net increase of $50 from adjustments to contingent
liabilities and approximately $11 related to a gain on settlement of a sales representation
agreement which had previously been recorded in continuing operations.  Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting identified in Second
Restatement As described above and in the Controls and Procedures section of this report, two material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting were identified at the time of the
First Restatement. Over the course of the Second Restatement process, we and D&T identified a
number of additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as
further described in the Controls and Procedures section of this report. D&T confirmed to the
Audit Committee these material weaknesses, listed below, on January 10, 2005:  
    
    lack of compliance with written Nortel Networks procedures for monitoring and adjusting
balances related to certain accruals and provisions, including restructuring charges and
contract and customer accruals;
    
    lack of compliance with Nortel Networks procedures for appropriately applying
applicable GAAP to the initial recording of certain liabilities including those described
in SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, or SFAS No. 5, and to foreign currency
translation as described in SFAS No. 52;
    
    lack of sufficient personnel with appropriate knowledge, experience and training in
U.S. GAAP and lack of sufficient analysis and documentation of the application of U.S.
GAAP to transactions, including but not limited to revenue transactions;
    
    lack of a clear organization and accountability structure within the accounting
function, including insufficient review and supervision, combined with financial reporting
systems that are not integrated and which require extensive manual interventions;
    
    lack of sufficient awareness of, and timely and appropriate remediation of, internal
control issues by Nortel Networks personnel; and
    
    an inappropriate tone at the top, which contributed to the lack of a strong control
environment; as reported in the Independent Review Summary referred to in the Controls
and Procedures section of this report, there was a Management tone at the top that
conveyed the strong leadership message that earnings targets could be met through
application of accounting practices that finance managers knew or ought to have known were
not in compliance with U.S. GAAP and that questioning these practices was not acceptable. 71




---



##### Table of Contents



Upon completion of managements assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004 pursuant to SOX 404, we currently expect to conclude that the first five of
these six material weaknesses continue to exist at December 31, 2004. We continue to identify,
develop and begin to implement remedial measures to address them, as described in the Controls and
Procedures section of this report. See also notes 2 and 19 to the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements. Revenue Independent Review Over the course of the Second Restatement process, management identified certain accounting
practices that it determined should be adjusted as part of the Second Restatement. In particular,
management identified certain errors related to revenue recognition and undertook a process of
revenue reviews. In light of the resulting adjustments to revenues previously reported, the Audit
Committee has determined to review the facts and circumstances leading to the restatement of these
revenues for specific transactions identified in the Second Restatement. The review will have a
particular emphasis on the underlying conduct that led to the initial recognition of these
revenues. The Audit Committee will seek a full understanding of the historic events that required
the revenues for these specific transactions to be restated and will consider any appropriate
additional remedial measures, including those involving internal controls and processes. The Audit
Committee has engaged WCPHD to advise it in connection with this review. Personnel actions In connection with the Independent Review, we have, among other actions, terminated for cause:  
    
    our former president and chief executive officer, former chief financial officer and
former controller in April 2004 (the former chief financial officer and former controller
having been placed on paid leaves of absence in March 2004); and
    
    seven additional senior finance employees with significant responsibilities for our
financial reporting as a whole or for their respective business units and geographic
regions in August 2004. Each of these former members of management had responsibility for their respective positions at the
time of the Comprehensive Review and First Restatement. The Board of Directors determined that
each of these individuals had significant responsibilities for our financial reporting as a whole,
or for their respective business units and geographic regions, and that each was aware, or ought to
have been aware, that our provisioning activity, described above, did not comply with U.S. GAAP. EDC Support Facility The delayed filing of the Reports with the SEC, the trustees under our and NNCs public debt
indentures and Export Development Canada, or EDC, gave EDC the right to (i) terminate its
commitments under the $750 EDC support facility, or the EDC Support Facility, relating to certain
of our performance related obligations arising out of normal course business activities, and (ii)
exercise certain rights against the collateral pledged under related security agreements or require
us to cash collateralize all existing support. We obtained waivers from EDC with respect to these
and related matters to permit continued access to the EDC Support Facility in accordance with its
terms while we complete our filing obligations with respect to the Reports. The current waiver
will expire on February 15, 2005. The waivers have also applied to certain additional breaches
under the EDC Support Facility relating to the delayed filings and the restatements and revisions
to our and NNCs prior financial results, or the Related Breaches. In connection with such
waivers, EDC reclassified the previously committed $300 revolving small bond sub-facility of the
EDC Support Facility as uncommitted support during the waiver period. The $300 revolving small
bond facility will not become committed support until all of the Reports have been filed with the
SEC and we obtain a permanent waiver of the Related Breaches. If we and NNC have not filed all of the Reports by February 15, 2005, EDC will have
the right, on such date, (absent a further waiver in relation to the delayed filings and the
Related Breaches), to (i) terminate the EDC Support Facility and (ii) exercise certain rights
against collateral or require us to cash collaterize all existing support. In addition, the Related Breaches will continue beyond the filing of the Reports. Accordingly, EDC
will have the right (absent a further waiver of the Related Breaches) beginning on February 15,
2005 to terminate or suspend the EDC Support Facility or exercise certain rights against collateral
notwithstanding the filing of the Reports. While we are seeking a permanent waiver from EDC in connection with the 72




---



##### Table of Contents



Related Breaches, there can be no assurance that
we will receive any waiver or as to the terms of any such waiver. As of January 21, 2005, approximately $292 of outstanding support under the EDC Support
Facility was outstanding, $208 of which was outstanding under the revolving small bond
sub-facility. See Available support facility and Risk factors/forward looking statements. Credit facilities and security agreements On April 28, 2004, we terminated our and Nortel Networks Inc., or NNI, $750 April 2000 five
year credit facilities, or the Five Year Facilities. Absent such termination, the banks would have
been permitted, upon 30 days notice, to terminate their commitments under the Five Year Facilities
as a result of our failure to file our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K by April 29, 2004. Upon
termination, the Five Year Facilities were undrawn. As a result of the termination of the Five Year Facilities, certain foreign security agreements
entered into by us and various of our subsidiaries, under which shares of certain of our
subsidiaries incorporated outside of the U.S. and Canada were pledged in favor of the banks under
the Five Year Facilities, EDC and the holders of our and NNCs outstanding public debt securities,
also terminated in accordance with their terms (see note 19 of the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements). In addition, the guarantees by certain subsidiaries
incorporated outside of the U.S. and Canada terminated in accordance with their terms. Security
agreements remain in place under which substantially all of our assets located in the U.S. and
Canada and those of most of our U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries, including the shares of certain of
our U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries, are pledged in favor of EDC and the holders of our and NNCs
outstanding public debt securities. In addition, the guarantees by certain of our wholly owned
subsidiaries, including NNI, most of our Canadian subsidiaries, Nortel Networks (Asia) Limited,
Nortel Networks (Ireland) Limited and Nortel Networks U.K. Limited, of our obligations under the
EDC Support Facility and our and NNCs outstanding public debt securities, remain in place. See
Liquidity and capital resources. Debt securities As a result of the delay in filing the Reports, we and NNC have not been in compliance with
our obligations to deliver the Reports to the trustees under our and NNCs public debt indentures.
As of December 31, 2004, approximately $1,800 of our notes (or our subsidiaries notes) and $1,800
of NNCs convertible debt securities were outstanding. These delays have not resulted in an automatic event of default and acceleration of the outstanding
long-term debt and such default and acceleration cannot occur unless notice by holders of at least
25% of the outstanding principal amount of any relevant series of debt securities of such
non-compliance is provided to us or NNC, as applicable, and we or NNC, as applicable, fail to file
and deliver the relevant Report within 90 days after such notice is provided, all in accordance
with the terms of the indentures. While such notice could have been given at any time after March
30, 2004, neither we nor NNC has received a notice to the date of
this report. After filing the 2003 Annual Reports and our and NNCs
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the first and second quarters of 2004, as
a result of the delay in filing our and NNCs Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2004, or the Third Quarter Reports, we and NNC continue not to be in compliance with our
obligations under our and NNCs public debt indentures, as
described above. If notice were given, we believe that it is probable
that we would file and deliver the Third Quarter Reports within
90 days of receipt of such a notice. In the unlikely event that acceleration of our debt securities were to occur, we may be unable to meet our payment
obligations. As previously reported, based on publicly available information as of January 10, 2005, we have
reason to believe that more than 25% of the outstanding principal amount of the $150 of 7.875%
notes due June 2026 issued by one of our subsidiaries and guaranteed by us are held by one holder,
or a group of related holders. Other than with respect to that series of debt securities, based on
such publicly available information, neither we nor NNC are aware of any holder, or group of
related holders, that holds at least 25% of the outstanding principal amount of any relevant series
of debt securities. However, based on such publicly available information, we have reason to
believe that there is sufficient concentration among holders of the $150 of 7.40% notes due June
2006 issued by us that the acquisition of a relatively small additional amount of these notes by
certain holders could result in a holder or a group of related holders holding 25% or more of the
outstanding principal amount of these notes. See Liquidity and capital resources and Risk
factors/forward looking statements. Shelf registration statement Owing to the delayed filing of the Reports, we are currently unable to use, in its current
form, the remaining approximately $800 of capacity under our shelf registration statement filed
with the SEC for various types of securities. See Liquidity and capital resources and Risk
factors/forward looking statements. 73




---



##### Table of Contents



Credit ratings On April 28, 2004,
Standard & Poors, or S&P, downgraded its ratings on us, including our
long-term corporate credit ratings from B to B and our preferred shares rating from CCC to
CCC. At the same time, it revised its outlook to developing from negative. On April 28, 2004,
Moodys Investors Service, Inc., or Moodys, changed its outlook to potential downgrade from
uncertain. See Credit ratings and Risk factors/forward looking statements. Regulatory actions and pending litigation We are under investigation by the SEC and the Ontario Securities Commission, or OSC,
Enforcement Staff. In addition, Nortel Networks has received a U.S. federal grand jury subpoena
for the production of certain documents sought in connection with an ongoing criminal investigation
being conducted by the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division.
Further, the Integrated Market Enforcement Team of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police., or RCMP, has
advised us that it would be commencing a criminal investigation into our financial accounting
situation. We will continue to cooperate fully with all authorities in connection with these
investigations and reviews. See Legal proceedings and Risk factors/forward looking statements. In addition, numerous class action complaints have been filed against us and NNC, including class
action complaints under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA. In addition, a
derivative action complaint has been filed against us and NNC. These pending civil litigation
actions and regulatory and criminal investigations are significant and if decided against us, could
materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity by
requiring us to pay substantial judgments, settlements, fines or other penalties. See Liquidity
and capital resources, Legal proceedings and Risk factors/forward looking statements. On May 31, 2004, the OSC issued a final order prohibiting all trading by our directors, officers
and certain current and former employees in the securities of Nortel Networks Corporation and
Nortel Networks Limited. This order will remain in effect until two full business days following
the receipt by the OSC of all filings required to be made by us and NNC pursuant to Ontario
securities laws. We and NNC continue to provide periodic updates to the NYSE and the TSX concerning our and
NNCs delay in filing certain of the Reports. The NYSE granted us and NNC an extension of up to
March 31, 2005 to file our 2003 Annual Reports, during which the Nortel Networks Corporation common
shares and our and NNCs other securities would remain listed on the NYSE and we and NNC filed the
2003 Annual Reports in January 2005. To the date of this report, neither the NYSE nor the TSX has
commenced any suspension or delisting procedures in respect of Nortel Networks Corporation common
shares or other of our or NNCs listed securities. The commencement of any suspension or delisting
procedure by either exchange remains, at all times, at the discretion of such exchange, and would
be publicly announced by the exchange. See Risk factors/forward looking statements. Stock-based compensation plans As a result of NNCs March 10, 2004 announcement that we and NNC would need to delay the
filing of our 2003 Annual Reports, we suspended as of March 10, 2004: the purchase of Nortel
Networks Corporation common shares under the stock purchase plans for eligible employees in
eligible countries that facilitate the acquisition of Nortel Networks Corporation common shares;
the exercise of outstanding options granted under the Nortel Networks Corporation 2000 Stock Option
Plan, or the 2000 Plan, or Nortel Networks Corporation 1986 Stock Option Plan as amended and
restated, or the 1986 Plan, or the grant of any additional options under those plans, or the
exercise of outstanding options granted under employee stock option plans previously assumed by us
in connection with mergers and acquisitions; and the purchase of units in a Nortel Networks stock
fund or purchase of Nortel Networks Corporation common shares under our defined contribution and
investments plans, until such time as, at the earliest, that we and NNC are in compliance with U.S.
and Canadian regulatory securities filing requirements. Evolution of our supply chain strategy Over the last five years, we have divested most of our manufacturing activities to Electronic
Manufacturing Services, or EMS, suppliers. On June 29, 2004, we announced an agreement with
Flextronics regarding the divestiture of substantially all of our remaining manufacturing
operations, including product integration, testing and repair operations carried out in our Systems
Houses in Calgary and Montreal, Canada and Campinas, Brazil, as well as certain activities related
to these locations, including the management of the supply chain,
related suppliers, and 74




---



##### Table of Contents



third-party logistics. In
Europe, Flextronics has made an offer to purchase similar operations at our Monkstown, Northern
Ireland and Chateaudun, France Systems Houses, subject to the completion of the required
information and consultation process. Under the terms of the agreement and offer, Flextronics will also acquire our global repair
services, as well as certain design assets in Ottawa, Canada and Monkstown related to hardware and
embedded software design, and related product verification for certain established optical
products. We have entered into a four year supply agreement with Flextronics for manufacturing services
(whereby Flextronics will manage approximately $2,500 of our annual cost of sales) and a three year
supply agreement for design services. The transfer of the optical design operations and related
assets in Ottawa and Monkstown closed in the fourth quarter of 2004. The portions of the
transaction related to the manufacturing activities in Montreal and Calgary are expected to close
in the first and second quarters of 2005, respectively. The balance of the transaction is expected
to close on separate dates occurring during the first half of 2005. These transactions are
subject to customary conditions and regulatory approvals. The successful completion of the agreement and offer with Flextronics will result in the transfer
of approximately 2,500 of our employees to Flextronics. We expect to receive cash proceeds ranging
from approximately $675 to $725, which will be allocated to each separate closing and, with respect
to each closing, will be paid on an installment basis up to nine months thereafter. Such payments
will be subject to a number of adjustments, including from potential post-closing date asset
valuations and potential post-closing indemnity payments. Flextronics also has the ability in
certain cases to exercise rights to sell back to us certain inventory and equipment after the
expiration of a specified period (of up to fifteen months) following each respective closing date.
We do not expect such rights to be exercised with respect to any material amount of inventory
and/or equipment. The cash proceeds estimate is comprised of approximately $475 to $525 for
inventory and equipment and $200 for intangible assets. The cash proceeds would be partially
offset by related estimated transaction costs (including transition, potential severance, and
information technology implementation and real estate costs) of approximately $200. We also announced that we plan to create Solutions Operations Centers in Calgary and Montreal and,
pending the completion of information and consultation processes in Europe, in Monkstown and
Chateaudun. These centers are expected to have overall responsibility for the strategic management
and control of our various supply chains, including all customer interfaces, customer service,
order management, quality assurance, product cost management, new product introduction, and network
solutions integration, testing and fulfillment. We believe that the use of an outsourced manufacturing model has enabled us to benefit from leading
manufacturing technologies, leverage existing resources from around the world, lower our cost of
sales, quickly adjust to fluctuations in market demand and decrease our investment in plant,
equipment and inventories. We continue to retain in-house all strategic management and overall
control responsibilities associated with our various supply chains, including all customer
interfaces, customer service, order management, quality assurance, product cost-management, new
product introduction, and network solutions integration, testing and fulfillment. Other business developments Customer financing commitments During the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, we reduced our undrawn customer financing
commitments by $115 and $131, respectively, primarily as a result of the expiration or cancellation
of commitments and changing customer business plans. As of June 30, 2004, all undrawn commitments
were available for funding under the terms of our financing agreements. For additional information,
see Customer financing. Sale of Entrust shares On February 3, 2004, we sold approximately 7 million common shares of Entrust Inc., or
Entrust, for cash consideration of $33, resulting in a gain of $18. In connection with this
transaction, we no longer hold any equity interest in Entrust. Real estate On March 1, 2004, we purchased land and two buildings for $87 that were previously leased by
us, which leases expired on February 28, 2004. As a result, we extinguished a debt of $87. 75




---



##### Table of Contents



Customer contract settlement On May 7, 2004, we received $80 in proceeds from the sale of certain assets in connection with
a customer contract settlement in Latin America. This resulted in a
gain of $78, which is included in (gain) loss on sale of businesses and assets for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Directory and operator services business On August 2, 2004, we completed the contribution of certain assets and liabilities of our
directory and operator services, or DOS, business to VoltDelta Resources LLC, or VoltDelta, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Volt Information Sciences, Inc., or VIS, in return for a 24% interest in
VoltDelta. After a period of two years, we and VIS each have an option to cause us to sell our
VoltDelta shares to VIS for proceeds ranging from $25 to $70. As a result of this transaction,
approximately 160 of our DOS employees in North America and Mexico joined VoltDelta. We recorded a
gain on sale of businesses and assets of approximately $50 in the third quarter of 2004. Bharat Sanchar Nigram Limited contract In August 2004, we entered into a contract with Bharat Sanchar Nigram Limited to establish a
wireless network in India. Our commitments to date for orders received under this contract have
resulted in an estimated project loss of approximately $150, which has been recorded in the third
quarter of 2004. Patent infringement settlement On October 26, 2004, we entered into an agreement with Foundry Networks, Inc., or Foundry, to
settle outstanding patent infringement claims and counterclaims by us and Foundry. As part of the
settlement, we granted Foundry a four year license under certain patents and Foundry paid $35 to
us. Customer financing arrangements On December 15 and 16, 2004, we sold certain notes receivable and convertible notes receivable
that had been received as a result of the restructuring of a customer financing arrangement for
cash proceeds of $116. The net carrying amount of the notes receivable and convertible notes
receivable was $56. On December 23, 2004, a customer financing arrangement was restructured. The notes receivable that
were restructured had a net carrying amount as of December 31, 2003 of $13, net of provisions for
doubtful accounts of $147 ($55 of the provision is included in discontinued operations). We are
currently assessing the value of the restructured notes receivable and expect that an increase in
value from the net carrying amount has occurred. Joint Ventures On January 20, 2005, we signed a Joint Venture Framework Agreement with China Putian
Corporation to establish a joint venture for R&D, manufacture and sale of third generation (3G)
mobile telecommunications equipment and products to customers in China. We expect to have a
definitive joint venture agreement by June 30, 2005. We anticipate that we will own 49% of the
joint venture and China Putian will own 51%. On January 23, 2005, we signed a Memorandum of Understanding with LG Electronics to establish a
joint venture for providing high quality, leading edge telecommunications equipment and networking
solutions to Korea and other markets globally. The proposed joint venture is subject to execution
of a definitive agreement. We expect to complete this transaction in the second quarter of 2005.
We anticipate that we will own 50% plus one share of the joint venture. Results of operations  continuing operations Segment revenues The following table summarizes our revenues for the three months and six months ended June 30,
2004 and 2003, 76




---



##### Table of Contents



respectively, by segment: For the three months ended June 30,
    
    

For the six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % Change
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % ChangeWireless Networks
    
    $
    1,281
    
    
    $
    973
    
    
    $
    308
    
    
    
    32
    
    
    $
    2,506
    
    
    $
    1,842
    
    
    $
    664
    
    
    
    36Enterprise Networks
    
    
    578
    
    
    
    520
    
    
    
    58
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    1,112
    
    
    
    1,105
    
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    1Wireline Networks
    
    
    444
    
    
    
    495
    
    
    
    (51
    )
    
    
    (10
    )
    
    
    883
    
    
    
    1,010
    
    
    
    (127
    )
    
    
    (13
    )Optical Networks
    
    
    280
    
    
    
    288
    
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    525
    
    
    
    605
    
    
    
    (80
    )
    
    
    (13
    )Other(a)
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    (5
    )
    
    
    (42
    )
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    (13
    )
    
    
    (62
    )Consolidated
    
    $
    2,590
    
    
    $
    2,288
    
    
    $
    302
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    $
    5,034
    
    
    $
    4,583
    
    
    $
    451
    
    
    
    10
 (a)
    
    Other represented miscellaneous business activities and corporate functions.
 Geographic revenues The following table summarizes our geographic revenues based on the location of the customer: For the three months ended June 30,
    
    

For the six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % Change
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % ChangeUnited States
    
    $
    1,322
    
    
    $
    1,148
    
    
    $
    174
    
    
    
    15
    
    
    $
    2,539
    
    
    $
    2,308
    
    
    $
    231
    
    
    
    10EMEA(a)
    
    
    643
    
    
    
    556
    
    
    
    87
    
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    1,239
    
    
    
    1,135
    
    
    
    104
    
    
    
    9Canada
    
    
    137
    
    
    
    134
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    291
    
    
    
    265
    
    
    
    26
    
    
    
    10Asia Pacific
    
    
    330
    
    
    
    329
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    677
    
    
    
    632
    
    
    
    45
    
    
    
    7CALA(b)
    
    
    158
    
    
    
    121
    
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    288
    
    
    
    243
    
    
    
    45
    
    
    
    19Consolidated
    
    $
    2,590
    
    
    $
    2,288
    
    
    $
    302
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    $
    5,034
    
    
    $
    4,583
    
    
    $
    451
    
    
    
    10
 (a)
    
    The Europe, Middle East and Africa region, or EMEA.(b)
    
    The Caribbean and Latin America region, or CALA.
 Consolidated revenues The following chart summarizes our recent quarterly revenues: (BAR CHART)  Q2 2004 vs. Q2 2003 and first half of 2004 vs. first half of 2003 Our consolidated revenues increased 13% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second
quarter of 2003 and increased 10% in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003.
Wireless Networks revenues improved substantially as a result of increased spending by our wireless
service provider customers on our Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems, or UMTS, Global
System for Mobile Communications, or GSM and Code Division Multiple Access, or CDMA, technologies.
Our Wireless Networks business benefited from new contracts with certain customers and other
customers expanding their existing networks to meet increased subscriber demand or enhancing their
networks to
support more sophisticated communication services. Enterprise Networks revenues increased
significantly in the second quarter due to a substantial increase in the circuit and packet voice
portion of this segment as customers continued to migrate towards converged packet voice solutions.
Declines in the other segments were primarily due to continued capital spending 77




---



##### Table of Contents



restrictions
experienced by our service provider customers. Customer spending remained cautious, with many of
our customers realigning capital spending with their current levels of revenues and profits in
order to maximize their return on invested capital. As a result, our customers continued to focus
on conserving capital, decreasing their debt levels, reducing costs and/or increasing the capacity
utilization rates and efficiency of existing networks. Also, excess network capacity and
competition continued to exist in the industry which led to continued pricing pressures on the sale
of certain of our products. From a geographic perspective, the 13% increase in revenues in the second quarter of 2004 and 10%
increase in revenues in the first half of 2004 compared to the same periods in 2003 was primarily
due to a:  
    
    15% increase in the U.S. in the second quarter (10% for the first half of 2004)
primarily due to the upgrading of CDMA networks in the region to higher data speeds and GSM
network expansion that has been tied to increased subscriber demand. The increase was
partially offset by continued capital spending restrictions experienced by wireline and
optical service providers and pricing and competitive pricing pressures on certain
Enterprise Networks data networking products;
    
    16% increase in EMEA in the second quarter (9% for the first half of 2004) primarily due
to GSM and UMTS network expansion that has been tied to increased subscriber demand, which
was partially offset by continued capital spending restrictions experienced by wireline
service providers; and
    
    31% increase in CALA in the second quarter (19% for the first half of 2004)
primarily due to the upgrading and expanding of CDMA networks to higher data speeds and GSM network
expansion that has been tied to increased subscriber demand. In addition, the first half of 2004 was impacted by a:  
    
    10% increase in revenues in Canada primarily due to GSM network expansion that
has been tied to increased subscriber demand partially offset by a substantial decline in
CDMA revenues; and
    
    7% increase in revenues in Asia Pacific primarily due to new GSM contracts
with certain service providers coupled with CDMA network upgrades, which was partially
offset by increased competition and reductions in capital spending for Optical Networks
products in the region.  Q2 2004 vs. Q1 2004 Our consolidated revenues increased 6% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the first
quarter of 2004 primarily due to an increase in Wireless Networks revenues and Enterprise Networks
revenues. Wireless Networks results improved as a result of network upgrades executed by certain
key customers and as migration from older to newer technology continued. Enterprise Networks
revenues increased in the second quarter due to a significant increase in the circuit and packet
voice portion segment as customers continued to migrate towards converged packet voice solutions. From a geographic perspective, the 6% increase in revenues in the second quarter of 2004 compared
to the first quarter of 2004 was primarily due to a:  
    
    9% increase in revenues in the U.S., 8% increase in EMEA and 22% increase in
CALA primarily due new contracts with certain service provider customers and the upgrading
of CDMA networks to higher data speeds and GSM network expansion that has been tied to
increased subscriber demand. The increase was partially offset by continued capital
spending restrictions experienced by wireline service providers; partially offset by
    
    5% decrease in revenues in Asia Pacific primarily due to completion of network
projects and slower build-out of new networks partially offset by 2002 sales that had been
deferred as a result of liquidated damages and right of return provisions; and
    
    11% decrease in revenues in Canada primarily due to completion of network
projects and slower build-out of new networks. 2004 and 2005 We expect that our consolidated revenues in 2004 will be slightly lower compared with 2003.
The 2003 consolidated revenues included revenues that were deferred from prior periods. Although
we expect a slight decline of consolidated
revenues in 2004 as compared to 2003, we saw growth in several areas in 2004 primarily as a result
of customers increasing their investments in: 78




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    voice over packet technologies;
    
    third generation wireless technologies; and
    
    expansion and enhancement of existing networks due to subscriber growth and competitive pressures. The period of relative industry stability that had characterized the second half of 2003 continued
into 2004. For 2005, we expect revenue growth over 2004 primarily due to continued growth in the
above areas. Spending in these areas of our business has been partially offset by customers limiting their
investment in mature technologies as they focus on maximizing return on investment capital. In
addition, we have continued to experience pricing pressures on sales of certain of our products as
a result of increased competition particularly from low cost suppliers. Further, while customer
support generally remains strong, we believe the ongoing restatement activities and the internal
restructuring and realignment programs initiated in August 2004 adversely impacted business
performance in 2004. Consolidated revenues for the third and fourth quarters of 2004 reflect certain of these trends,
with third quarter 2004 consolidated revenues lower than previously announced preliminary unaudited
consolidated revenues for the second quarter of 2004. Our fourth quarter is expected to be our
strongest quarter in 2004. Our quarterly results of operations will not necessarily be consistent
with our historical quarterly profile or indicative of our expected results in future quarters.
See Risk factors/forward looking statements for other factors that may affect our revenues. Wireless Networks revenues The following chart summarizes recent quarterly revenues for Wireless Networks: (BAR CHART) Q2 2004 vs. Q2 2003 Wireless Networks revenues increased 32% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second
quarter of 2003 due to increased spending by our wireless service provider customers on our UMTS,
GSM and CDMA technologies. We benefited from new contracts with certain customers and other
customers expanding their existing networks to meet increased subscriber demand or enhancing their
networks to support more sophisticated communication services. CDMA revenues increased significantly in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter
of 2003 due to a substantial increase in the U.S., CALA and EMEA. The substantial increase in the
U.S. was primarily a result of our customers upgrading and expanding their existing networks to
accommodate higher data speeds. The substantial increase in CALA and EMEA was primarily due to new
contracts with certain service provider customers and other customers expanding their existing
networks to meet increased subscriber demand. These increases in revenues were partially offset by
substantial revenue declines in Canada and Asia Pacific primarily due to the completion of key
customer network deployments during the first half of 2003. Time Division Multiple Access, or TDMA, revenues declined substantially in the second quarter of
2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 primarily due to the continued transition to newer
wireless technologies. The substantial decline was primarily due to customers across all regions
continuing to migrate from the mature TDMA technology to GSM and CDMA technologies. In the second
quarter of 2004, TDMA revenues accounted for less than 2% of total Wireless Networks
revenues compared to 7% in the second quarter of 2003. GSM revenues increased substantially in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter
of 2003. The substantial 79




---



##### Table of Contents



increase was due to substantial increased revenues across all regions
primarily related to accelerated network expansions with certain service providers to meet
increased subscriber demand, new contracts with certain service provider customers and other
customers expanding their existing networks. UMTS revenues increased substantially in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter
of 2003 primarily due to increased subscriber demand, new contracts with certain service provider
customers and continued transition to this next generation technology in EMEA and the U.S. From a geographic perspective, the 32% increase in Wireless Networks revenues in the second quarter
of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 was primarily due to a 35% increase in revenues in the
U.S., a 63% increase in revenues in EMEA and a 36% increase in revenues in CALA primarily due to
new contracts with certain service provider customers and other customers expanding or enhancing
their existing networks to meet increased subscriber demand and in the U.S., customers expanding
and upgrading their existing networks to accommodate higher data speeds. First half 2004 vs. first half 2003 Wireless Networks revenues increased 36% in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half
of 2003 due to increased spending by our wireless service provider customers on our CDMA, GSM and
UMTS technologies as a result of new contracts with certain customers and other customers expanding
their existing networks to meet increased subscriber demand or enhancing their networks to support
more sophisticated communication services. CDMA revenues increased significantly in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003
due to substantial increases in the U.S. and CALA. The substantial increases in the U.S. and CALA
were primarily due to new contracts with certain service provider customers and other customers
upgrading and expanding their existing networks to meet increased subscriber demand. These
increases in revenues were partially offset by a substantial decline in CDMA revenue in Canada
primarily due to the completion of certain customer network deployments during the first half of
2003. TDMA revenues declined substantially in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003
primarily due to the continued transition to newer wireless technologies. The substantial decline
was primarily due to customers across all regions continuing to migrate from the mature TDMA
technology to GSM and CDMA technologies. In the first half of 2004, TDMA revenues accounted for
less than 2% of total Wireless Networks revenues compared to 8% in the first half of 2003. GSM revenues increased substantially in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003.
The substantial increase was due to substantial increased revenues across all regions primarily
related to accelerated network expansions with certain service providers to meet increased
subscriber demand, new contracts with certain service provider customers and other customers
expanding their existing networks. UMTS revenues increased substantially in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003
primarily due to increased subscriber demand, new contracts with certain service provider customers
and other customers expanding their existing networks and the continued transition to this next
generation technology. From a geographic perspective, the 36% increase in Wireless Networks revenues in the first half of
2004 compared to the same period in 2003 was primarily due to a 32% increase in revenues in the
U.S., a 52% increase in revenues in EMEA, a 47% increase in Asia Pacific, a 34% increase in
revenues in Canada, and a 17% increase in CALA primarily due to new contracts with certain service
provider customers and other customers expanding or enhancing their existing networks to meet
increased subscriber demand and in the U.S., customers expanding and upgrading their existing
networks to accommodate higher data speeds. Q2 2004 vs. Q1 2004 Wireless Networks revenues increased 5% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the first
quarter of 2004 due to an increase in GSM revenues. The increase for GSM was primarily due to
increased customer spending on network enhancements and strong subscriber growth in certain
markets. From a geographic perspective, the 5% increase in Wireless Networks revenues in the second quarter
of 2004 compared to
the first quarter in 2004 was primarily due to a 10% increase in revenues in the U.S., a 14%
increase in revenues in EMEA, and a 40% increase in revenues in CALA, partially offset by a 28%
decrease in revenues in Asia Pacific and a 28% decrease in revenues in Canada. The decreases in
Canada and Asia Pacific were mainly related to completion of network
projects and slower build-out
of new networks. The increases in the U.S., EMEA 80




---



##### Table of Contents



and CALA are primarily due to new contracts with
certain service provider customers and other customers expanding or enhancing their existing
networks to meet increased subscriber demand and in the U.S., customers expanding and upgrading
their existing networks to accommodate higher data speeds. 2004 and 2005 During 2004, Wireless Networks revenues continued to be primarily generated by sales of CDMA
and GSM technologies. Also, revenues associated with our TDMA technology continued to decline in
2004 compared to 2003 due to the continued transition to newer wireless technologies. Regarding
our UMTS technology, revenues have grown compared to 2003 as a result of contracts announced in the
second half of 2003 and in 2004 and the continued transition to this next generation technology.
We expect a growing percentage of our Wireless Networks revenues to come from our UMTS technology.
While we have seen encouraging indicators in certain areas of the wireless market, we can provide
no assurance that these growth areas that have begun to emerge will continue in the future. Enterprise Networks revenues The following chart summarizes recent quarterly revenues for Enterprise Networks: (BAR CHART) Q2 2004 vs. Q2 2003 Enterprise Networks revenues increased 11% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the
second quarter of 2003 due to a substantial increase in the circuit and packet voice portion of
this segment partially offset by a decrease in the data networking and security portion of this
segment. Revenues from the circuit and packet voice portion of this segment increased substantially in the
second quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. The substantial increase is primarily
due to the substantial increase in revenues associated with our converged internet protocol, or IP,
telephony solutions as customers continued to migrate towards converged packet voice solutions.
Our traditional circuit switching revenue increased slightly as we experienced an increase in
volume with certain of our large U.S. channel partners during the second quarter of 2004. Revenues associated with the data networking and security portion of this segment decreased in the
second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003. The decrease to revenue was
primarily due to pricing pressures driven by increased competition and a decrease in volume of
certain of our largest channel partners. From a geographic perspective, the 11% increase in Enterprise Networks revenues in the second
quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 was primarily due to a 16% increase in revenues
in the U.S., a 5% increase in revenues in EMEA and a 38% increase in revenues in CALA. The
increases were primarily due to an increase in volume of certain of our largest U.S. channel
partners partially offset by pricing and competitive pressures on certain of our data products.
The increase is also due to revenues associated with our IP telephony solutions as customers
continued to migrate towards converged packet voice solutions. First half 2004 vs. first half 2003 Enterprise Networks revenues was essentially flat in the first half of 2004 compared to the
first half of 2003 due to a significant increase in the circuit and packet voice portion of this
segment partially offset by a significant decrease in the data 81




---



##### Table of Contents



networking and security portion of
this segment. Revenues from the circuit and packet voice portion of this segment increased significantly in the
first half of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. We experienced a reduction in revenues
associated with our traditional circuit switching products primarily due to a decline in volume
with certain of our large U.S. channel partners. As IP telephony continues to grow in acceptance,
we continue to experience revenue declines in our traditional circuit switching. However, these
declines were more than offset by a substantial increase in revenues associated with our IP
telephony solutions as customers continued to migrate towards converged packet voice solutions. Revenues associated with the data networking and security portion of this segment decreased
significantly in the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. The significant
decrease in revenues was primarily due to a decline in sales of our legacy routing portfolio and
associated declines in new service contracts and service contract renewals. We also experienced a
decline in revenue from certain of our data networking products primarily due to pricing pressures
driven by increased competition. These declines were partially offset by growth from improved
market penetration of certain new products. From a geographic perspective, Enterprise Networks revenues was essentially flat in the first half
of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003 primarily due to an 4% increase in the U.S. and a 20%
increase in CALA partially offset by a 9% decline in Asia Pacific and a 3% decline in EMEA. The
increases in the U.S. and CALA were primarily due to an increase in volume of certain of our
largest U.S. channel partners partially offset by pricing and competitive pressures on certain of
our data products. The increase is also due to revenues associated with our IP telephony solutions
as customers continued to migrate towards converged packet voice solutions. The declines in Asia
Pacific and EMEA were primarily due to pricing and competitive pressures on certain data networking
products, continuing economic uncertainty in the EMEA region and a reduction in our traditional
circuit switching products. Q2 2004 vs. Q1 2004 Enterprise Networks revenues increased 8% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the first
quarter of 2004 due to a significant increase in the circuit and packet voice portion of this
segment and an increase in the data networking and security portion of this segment. Revenues associated with the circuit and packet voice portion of this segment increased
significantly as customers continued to migrate towards converged packet voice solutions. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in volume with certain of our large U.S. channel partners
as well as U.S. federal government sales, which were down in the first quarter of 2004 due to
seasonal declines. Revenues associated with the data networking and security portion of this segment increased in the
second quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2004 primarily due to an increase in volume
of certain of our largest channel partners. From a geographic perspective, the 8% increase in Enterprise Networks revenues in the second
quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2004 was primarily due to a 12% increase in the
U.S., an 18% increase in Asia Pacific and a 4% increase in EMEA. The increases are primarily due
to an increase in volume of certain of our largest U.S. channel partners partially offset by
competitive pressures on certain of our data products. The increase is also due to revenues
associated with our IP telephony solutions as customers continued to migrate towards converged
packet voice solutions. 2004 and 2005 During 2004, our Enterprise Networks customers continued to increase the deployment of voice
over packet technologies in their communications networks. We expect that data, voice and
multimedia communications will continue to converge, and enterprises will look for ways to maximize
the effectiveness of their existing networks while reducing ongoing capital expenditures and
operating costs. Also, we anticipate that demand will continue to decline for our traditional
circuit switching products, however, it is difficult to determine the extent to which future
declines in demand will occur as a result of the migration to voice over packet technologies. In
2005, we are focused on increasing our market presence with enterprise customers. In particular,
we are focusing on leading enterprise customers with high performance
networking needs. While we have seen encouraging indicators in certain parts of the enterprise market, we can provide no
assurance that the growth areas that have begun to emerge will continue in the future. 82




---



##### Table of Contents



Wireline Networks revenues The following chart summarizes recent quarterly revenues for Wireline Networks: (BAR CHART) Q2 2004 vs. Q2 2003 Wireline Networks revenues declined 10% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second
quarter of 2003 due to a decline in the circuit and packet voice portion of this segment and a
significant decline in the data networking and security portion of this segment. Revenues from the circuit and packet voice portion of this segment decreased in the second quarter
of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 primarily due to a significant decline in our
traditional circuit switching product revenues. The significant decline in our circuit switching
product revenues was primarily due to the continued capital spending restrictions experienced by
our U.S. service provider customers and also uncertainty related to the impact of the Federal
Communications Commission, or FCC, decision regarding regulation of the availability of unbundled
network elements, or UNEs, released on August 21, 2003 and subsequent judicial review and FCC
reconsideration of the decision. The significant decline in traditional circuit switching product
revenues was partially offset by the substantial increase in revenues related to our packet voice
solutions as customers transitioned to these products from our traditional circuit switching
products. Revenues from the data networking and security portion of this segment decreased significantly in
the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 primarily due to a substantial
decline in EMEA as we experienced a decline in demand for our mature products primarily due to the
continued capital spending restrictions experienced by our service provider customers. From a geographic perspective, the 10% decline in Wireline Networks revenues in the second quarter
of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 was primarily due to a:  
    
    20% decline in revenues in EMEA primarily due to a decline in demand for our
mature products primarily due to the ongoing industry adjustment as service providers
continued to reduce their capital expenditures; and
    
    12% decline in revenues in the U.S. primarily due to the continued impact of
capital spending restrictions experienced by our service provider customers; partially
offset by
    
    60% increase in revenues in CALA primarily due to demand for next generation
packet voice solutions. First half 2004 vs. first half 2003 Wireline Networks revenues declined 13% in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half
of 2003 due to a decline in the circuit and packet voice portion of this segment and a significant
decline in the data networking and security portion of this segment. Revenues from the circuit and packet voice portion of this segment decreased in the first half of
2004 compared to the first half of 2003 primarily due to a significant decline in our traditional
circuit switching product revenues. The significant decline was primarily due to the continued
impact of capital spending restrictions experienced by our U.S. service provider
customers and the uncertainty related to the impact of the FCC decision regarding UNEs. The
significant decline in traditional circuit switching product revenues was partially offset by the
substantial increase in revenues related to our packet voice solutions as customers transitioned
from our traditional circuit switching products. 83




---



##### Table of Contents



Revenues from the data networking and security portion of this segment decreased significantly in
the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003 primarily due to substantial declines in
the U.S., Canada and EMEA. In these regions, we experienced a decline in demand for our mature
products primarily due to the continued capital spending restrictions experienced by our service
provider customers. From a geographic perspective, the 13% decline in Wireline Networks revenues in the first half of
2004 compared to the first half of 2003 was primarily due to a:  
    
    18% decline in revenues in the U.S. primarily due to the continued impact of
capital spending restrictions experienced by our service provider customers; and
    
    15% decline in revenues in EMEA primarily due to a decline in demand for our
mature products primarily due to the ongoing industry adjustment as service providers
continued to reduce their capital expenditures. Q2 2004 vs. Q1 2004 Wireline Networks revenues were essentially flat in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the
first quarter of 2004 due to a decrease in the circuit and packet voice portion of this segment
almost completely offset by a significant increase in the data networking and security portion of
this segment. From a geographic perspective, Wireline Networks revenues were essentially flat in the second
quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2004 primarily due to a 1% decline in the U.S. and
4% decline in CALA partially offset by a 10% increase in Canada, a 2% increase in EMEA, and a 5%
increase in Asia Pacific. 2004 and 2005 In 2004, our service provider customers continued to increase the deployment of packet-based
technologies in their communications networks as they looked for ways to optimize their existing
networks and offer new revenue generating services while limiting capital expenditures and
operating costs. However, the timing of when service provider customers will deploy packet-based
technologies on a wider scale is still unclear. Further, it is difficult to determine the effect
the FCC decision regarding the regulation of the availability of UNEs and subsequent adoption on
December 15, 2004 of new unbundling rules in response to the remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the D.C. Circuit will have on our business. The demand for our traditional circuit switching
products has continued to decline as certain service providers continued to reduce their capital
expenditures on these legacy technologies. While we have seen encouraging indicators in certain
areas of the wireline service provider market, we can provide no assurance that the growth areas
that have begun to emerge will continue in the future. Optical Networks revenues The following chart summarizes recent quarterly revenues for Optical Networks: (BAR CHART) Q2 2004 vs. Q2 2003 and first half 2004 vs first half 2003 Optical Networks revenues declined 3% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second
quarter of 2003 and declined 13% in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003. 84




---



##### Table of Contents



Revenues in the long-haul portion of this segment declined substantially in the second quarter of
2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 and in the first half of 2004 compared to the first
half of 2003. The substantial decline was primarily due to continued capital spending restrictions
in U.S. and Asia Pacific as customers continued to focus on maximizing return on invested capital
by increasing the capacity utilization rates and efficiency of existing networks. In addition,
significant excess inventories continued to exist in this portion of the segment which resulted in
ongoing pricing pressures across all regions. Revenues in the metro optical portion of this segment increased substantially in the second quarter
of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 and in the first half of 2004 compared to the first
half of 2003. The substantial increase in revenues was primarily due to certain service provider
customers upgrading and expanding their existing networks. From a geographic perspective, the 3% decline in Optical Networks revenues in the second quarter of
2004 compared to the same period in 2003 was primarily due to a:  
    
    18% decline in revenues in the U.S. primarily related to the completion of
certain long-haul network build-outs and other one-time shipments to certain customers in
2003; partially offset by
    
    50% increase in revenues in Canada and an 11% increase in revenues in EMEA
primarily related to certain service provider customers upgrading and expanding their
regional networks. From a geographic perspective, the 13% decline in Optical Networks revenues in the first half of
2004 compared to the first half of 2003 was primarily due to a:  
    
    29% decline in revenues in Asia Pacific primarily due to increased competition
and reductions in capital spending for optical products; and
    
    6% decline in revenues in the U.S. and a 9% decline in EMEA primarily related
to the completion of certain long-haul network build-outs and other one-time shipments to
certain customers in 2003. Q2 2004 vs. Q1 2004 Optical Networks revenues increased 14% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the first
quarter of 2004. The significant increase was primarily the result of a certain service provider
customer upgrading and expanding their existing networks and deferred revenue that was recognized
in Asia Pacific related to liquidated damages and right of return on sales of equipment that were
manufactured in the second quarter of 2002. Shipments related to previously established North
American partnership agreements also contributed to the sales growth. From a geographic perspective, the 14% increase in Optical Networks revenues in the second quarter
of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2004 was primarily due to a 52% increase in Asia Pacific.
The increase in Asia Pacific was primarily due to the recognition of revenue in the second quarter
of 2004 related to 2002 sales that had been deferred as a result of liquidated damages and right of
return provisions. 2004 and 2005 During 2004, our major customers in the optical long-haul portion of Optical Networks remained
focused on maximizing return on their invested capital by increasing the capacity utilization rates
and efficiency of existing networks. We expect that any additional capital spending by those
customers in the near term will be increasingly directed to opportunities that enhance customer
performance, revenue generation and cost reduction. We see an increase in demand for metro Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing, or metro DWDM. This
increase is primarily due to new network deployments by certain customers and other customers
expanding their networks, driven by emerging applications such as Cable Video on Demand, all of
which have resulted in a need for low cost, high capacity connectivity between network sites. As a
result, we expect that the metro optical portion of this segment will continue to represent a
larger percentage of overall Optical Networks revenues. While we have seen encouraging indicators
in certain
parts of the optical market, we can provide no assurance that the growth areas that have begun to
emerge will continue in the future. 85




---



##### Table of Contents



Gross profit and gross margin For the three months ended June 30,
    
    
    For the six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    Change
    
    
    % Change
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    Change
    
    
    % ChangeGross profit
    
    $
    1,052
    
    
    $
    881
    
    
    $
    171
    
    
    
    19
    
    
    $
    2,124
    
    
    $
    1,788
    
    
    $
    336
    
    
    
    19Gross margin
    
    
    40.6
    %
    
    
    38.5
    %
    
    2.1 pts
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    42.2
    %
    
    
    39.0
    %
    
    3.2 pts
 Gross margin improved 2.1 percentage points in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the
second quarter of 2003 and improved 3.2 percentage points for the first half of 2004 compared to
the first half of 2003 primarily due to:  
    
    continued improvements in our cost structure primarily as a result of
favorable supplier pricing; partially offset by
    
    changes in product mix mainly related to decreased volumes of certain products with higher margins; and
    
    pricing pressures on certain of our products. While we cannot predict the extent to which changes in product mix and pricing pressures will
impact our gross margin, we continue to see the effects of improvements in our product costs
primarily due to favorable material pricing. Considering the impacts of our strategic plan
described under Business overview  Our strategic plan and outlook and the higher costs
associated with initial customer deployments in emerging markets, we expect that gross margin will
trend in the range of 40% to 44% through 2005. See Risk factors/ forward looking statements for
factors that may affect our gross margins. Segment gross profit and gross margin Wireless Networks Wireless Networks gross margin decreased by approximately 4 percentage points in the second quarter
of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 and was essentially flat in the first half of 2004
compared to the same period in 2003 primarily due to:  
    
    reductions in the selling price of certain products as a result of increased
competition for service provider customers;
    
    changes in product mix mainly related to decreased volumes of certain products with higher margins; and
    
    an increase in contract-related costs including customer trials. Enterprise Networks Enterprise Networks gross margin improved by approximately 5 percentage points in the second
quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 and improved by approximately 2 percentage
points in the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 primarily due to:  
    
    improvements in our product costs primarily as a result of favorable material pricing; and
    
    reductions in other operations related costs including customer service and warranty costs; partially offset by
    
    reductions in the selling price of certain of our products in 2003 as a result
of increased competition for enterprise customers. Wireline Networks Wireline Networks gross margin decreased by approximately 5 percentage points in the second quarter
of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 and decreased by approximately 1 percentage point in
the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 primarily due to changes in product mix
mainly related to decreased volumes of certain products with higher margins. Optical Networks Optical Networks gross margin improved by approximately 24 percentage points in the second quarter
of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 and improved by approximately 13 percentage points
in the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 primarily due to: 86




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    increased volume of higher margin sales contracts;
    
    continued cost reduction on our current generation products in both the
long-haul portion and metro optical portion of this segment; and
    
    reductions in operations related costs, primarily in the U.S. and EMEA; partially offset by
    
    continued pricing pressures on the sale of certain products. Operating expenses Selling, general and administrative expense For the three months ended June 30,
    
    
    For the six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % Change
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % ChangeSG&A expense
    
    $
    538
    
    
    $
    439
    
    
    $
    99
    
    
    
    23
    
    
    $
    1,076
    
    
    $
    929
    
    
    $
    147
    
    
    
    16As % of revenues
    
    
    20.8
    %
    
    
    19.2
    %
    
    1.6 pts
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    21.4
    %
    
    
    20.3
    %
    
    1.1 pts
 SG&A expense increased $99 in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of
2003 and $147 in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003 primarily due to:  
    
    an increase in expense related to our stock-based compensation plans,
including restricted stock unit and stock option programs;
    
    net trade and customer financing receivable recoveries of $1 in the second
quarter of 2004 compared to a recovery of $81 in the second quarter of 2003. Recoveries
were higher in 2003 as a result of favorable settlements related to the sale or
restructuring of various receivables and net recoveries on other trade and customer
financing receivables due to subsequent collections for amounts exceeding our original
estimates of net recovery;
    
    costs related to our restatement activities of approximately $29 in the first half of 2004; and
    
    significant unfavorable foreign exchange impacts associated with the Canadian dollar, euro and British pound. Overall in 2004, we expect increased SG&A expense compared to 2003 primarily as a result of net
trade and customer financing receivable recoveries of $179 that were included in our SG&A expense
in 2003 that are not expected to be repeated at the same levels in 2004, negative foreign exchange
impacts, increases in our stock-based compensation programs and costs of approximately $115 related
to our restatement activities. Although we expect increased SG&A expense in 2004 compared to 2003,
through the implementation of our strategic plan, we expect to reduce operating expenses (both SG&A
and R&D expense) to 35% of revenues or lower on an annualized basis in 2005. See Business
overview  Our strategic plan and outlook. Segment selling, general and administrative expense Wireless Networks Wireless Networks SG&A expense increased substantially in both the second quarter of 2004 compared
to the second quarter of 2003 and the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003
primarily due to:  
    
    increases in employee related expenses;
    
    net trade and customer financing receivable recoveries in 2003 not repeated in 2004; and
    
    unfavorable foreign exchange rate impacts associated with the Canadian dollar and euro. Enterprise Networks Enterprise Networks SG&A expense increased in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second
quarter of 2003 and increased slightly in the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in
2003 primarily due to:  
    
    significant unfavorable foreign exchange impacts associated with the Canadian dollar, euro and British pound;
    
    increases in sales and marketing expenses; and
    
    increases in employee related expenses. 87




---



##### Table of Contents



Wireline Networks Wireline Networks SG&A expense increased in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second
quarter of 2003 and increased slightly in the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in
2003 primarily due to:  
    
    significant unfavorable foreign exchange impacts associated with the Canadian dollar, euro and British pound;
    
    increases in employee related expenses; and
    
    planned investment in strategic businesses. Optical Networks Optical Networks SG&A expense decreased slightly in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the
second quarter of 2003 and decreased in the first half of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003.
These reductions were primarily due to the continued impact of our workforce reductions across all
regions and associated reductions in other related costs such as information services and real
estate. Research and development expense For the three months ended June 30,
    
    
    For the six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % Change
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % ChangeR&D expense
    
    $
    489
    
    
    $
    501
    
    
    $
    (12
    )
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    $
    955
    
    
    $
    978
    
    
    $
    (23
    )
    
    
    (2
    )As % of revenues
    
    
    18.9
    %
    
    
    21.9
    %
    
    (3.0 pts
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    19.0
    %
    
    
    21.3
    %
    
    (2.3 pts
    )
 R&D expense decreased by 3.0 percentage points in the first quarter of 2004 and decreased by
2.3 percentage points in the first half of 2004 compared to the same periods in 2003 primarily due
to the continued impact of our workforce reductions partially offset by unfavorable foreign
exchange impacts. Our continued strategic investments in R&D are aligned with technology leadership in anticipated
growth areas. We maintained a technology focus and commitment to invest in new innovative
solutions where we believed we would achieve the greatest future benefit from this investment. As
a result, our R&D expense as a percentage of our consolidated revenues decreased slightly to 18.9%
in the second quarter of 2004 compared to 21.9% in the second quarter of 2003 and 19.0% in the
first half of 2004 compared to 21.3% in the first half of 2003. We expect to continue to manage R&D expense according to the requirements of our business,
allocating resources and investment where customer demand dictates, and reducing resources and
investment where opportunities for improved efficiencies present themselves. Our R&D efforts are
currently focused on secure and reliable converged networks including:  
    
    packetization of voice and multimedia IP telephony solutions services;
    
    services edge capability to realize simplification of customer network
operations and broadband access technologies, including wireless and wireline; and
    
    enhanced network security to ensure the level of reliability and performance
that has traditionally existed in carrier networks. We expect that our R&D expense as a percentage of revenue in 2004 will be similar to 2003 and 2005
will be lower than 2004 as we seek to achieve ongoing cost reductions in R&D as part of our
strategic plan first announced in August 2004. See
Business overview  Our strategic plan and outlook. Segment research and development expense Wireless Networks Wireless Networks R&D expense increased in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second
quarter of 2003 and increased slightly in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003
primarily due to:  
    
    continued investment in the development of new CDMA products; 88




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    acceleration of programs to increase the feature content in GSM product offering; and
    
    unfavorable foreign exchange rate impacts associated with the Canadian dollar and euro. Enterprise Networks Enterprise Networks R&D expense decreased in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second
quarter of 2003 and in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003 primarily due to:  
    
    effectively prioritizing investment in data products and increased outsourcing activity; partially offset by
    
    unfavorable foreign exchange rate impacts associated with the
Canadian dollar; and
    
    acceleration of IP portfolio R&D programs. Wireline Networks Wireline Networks R&D expense increased in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second
quarter of 2003 and in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003 primarily due to:  
    
    continued investment in the development of new voice and data products;
    
    accelerated development of certain new products; and
    
    unfavorable foreign exchange rate impacts associated with the Canadian dollar. Optical Networks Optical Networks R&D expense decreased substantially in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the
second quarter of 2003 and in the first half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003 primarily
due to  
    
    the continued impact of our workforce reductions that targeted a level of R&D
expense that was more representative of the volume of our business; partially offset by
    
    unfavorable foreign exchange rate impacts associated with the Canadian dollar. Segment Management EBT For the three months ended June 30,
    
    
    For the six months ended June 30,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % Change
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    $ Change
    
    
    % ChangeWireless Networks
    
    $
    168
    
    
    $
    112
    
    
    $
    56
    
    
    
    50
    
    
    $
    389
    
    
    $
    162
    
    
    $
    227
    
    
    
    140Enterprise Networks
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    42
    
    
    
    382
    
    
    
    56
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    21
    
    
    
    60Wireline Networks
    
    
    (11
    )
    
    
    56
    
    
    
    (67
    )
    
    
    (120
    )
    
    
    (16
    )
    
    
    94
    
    
    
    (110
    )
    
    
    (117
    )Optical Networks
    
    
    (34
    )
    
    
    (107
    )
    
    
    73
    
    
    
    68
    
    
    
    (87
    )
    
    
    (159
    )
    
    
    72
    
    
    
    45Other
    
    
    (173
    )
    
    
    (92
    )
    
    
    (81
    )
    
    
    (88
    )
    
    
    (244
    )
    
    
    (211
    )
    
    
    (33
    )
    
    
    (16
    )Total
    
    $
    (19
    )
    
    $
    (42
    )
    
    $
    23
    
    
    
    55
    
    
    $
    98
    
    
    $
    (79
    )
    
    $
    177
    
    
    
    224
 The changes in segment Management EBT are a result of the gross margin, SG&A expense and R&D
expense changes discussed above. See Segment information in note 5 of the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of segment Management EBT to net earnings
(loss) from continuing operations. Special charges During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we continued to implement our
restructuring work plan initiated in 2001. In addition, as described below, certain exit
activities initiated in 2003 were continued. Special charges recorded from January 1, 2004 to June
30, 2004 were as follows: 89




---



##### Table of Contents



ContractsettlementWorkforce
    
    
    and leasereduction
    
    
    costs
    
    
    TotalProvision balance as of December 31, 2003(a)
    
    $
    64
    
    
    $
    455
    
    
    $
    519Special charges:For the three months ended March 31, 2004
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6For the three months ended June 30, 2004
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Revisions to prior accruals:For the three months ended March 31, 2004
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    1For the three months ended June 30, 2004
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (1
    )Cumulative provision (drawdowns) adjustments in 2004:Cash drawdowns
    
    
    (39
    )
    
    
    (100
    )
    
    
    (139
    )Non-cash drawdowns
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Foreign exchange and other adjustments
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    6Provision balance as of June 30, 2004 (a)
    
    $
    31
    
    
    $
    361
    
    
    $
    392
 (a)
    
    As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the short-term provision balance was $124 and
$205, respectively, and the long-term provision balance was $268 and
$314, respectively, (which
was included in long-term provisions, as a component of other liabilities).
 We implemented our work plan to streamline our operations and activities around our core
markets and leadership strategies during 2001 in light of the significant downturn in both the
telecommunications industry and the economic environment, and capital market trends impacting our
operations and expected future growth rates. This work plan was adjusted during 2001, 2002 and
2003 to reflect the continued decline in the industry and economic environment, and in the capital
markets. In addition, we initiated activities in 2003 to exit certain leased facilities and leases
for assets no longer used across all segments. We recorded special charges of $(1) and $6, in the second quarter and first half of 2004
respectively, which included revisions of $(1) and nil respectively, related to prior accruals. In the first half of 2004, we recorded special charges of $6 related to our continued restructuring
work plan. No new charges related to our continued restructuring work plan were incurred in the
second quarter of 2004. Our workforce reduction provision balance was drawn down by cash payments
of $39. The remaining provision is expected to be substantially drawn down by the end of 2004. No new contract settlement and lease costs were incurred during for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the provision balance for contract
settlement and lease costs was drawn down by cash payments of $100. The remaining provision, net
of approximately $307 in estimated sublease revenue, is expected to be substantially drawn down by
the end of 2013. On December 31, 2003, our workforce was 35,160. In 2004 and into 2005, our focus is on managing
each of our businesses based on financial performance, the market and customer priorities. In the
third quarter of 2004, we announced a strategic plan that includes a work plan involving focused
workforce reductions and a voluntary retirement program relating in the aggregate of approximately
3,250 employees, real estate optimization and other cost containment actions such as reductions in
information services costs, outsourced services and other discretionary spending. Expected cash
costs in connection with this work plan are approximately $430. See Business overview  Our
strategic plan and outlook. For additional information on expected future cash outflows related to special charges, see
Liquidity and capital resources  Uses of liquidity. For additional information related to our
restructuring activities, see Special charges in note 6 of the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements. Gain (loss) on sale of businesses and assets Gain on sale of businesses and assets were $75 in the second quarter of 2004 and were $75 in
the first half of 2004 primarily related to the sale of certain assets in CALA compared to a loss
on sale of businesses and assets of $13 and $12, respectively, for the same periods in 2003. 90




---



##### Table of Contents



For additional information relating to these asset sales, see Divestitures in note 9 of the
accompanying unaudited financial statements. Other income (expense)  net In the first half of 2004, other income  net was $74 which primarily included:  
    
    gain of $18 related to the sale of our remaining 7 million common shares of Entrust;
    
    interest income of $30 and dividend income of $9 on our short-term investments;
    
    $11 related to the gain on prepaid equity forward purchase contracts that were
entered into in connection with the issuance of restricted stock units; and
    
    gain of $13 related to the sale of Arris Group, Inc., or Arris Group, shares.
For additional information on our investment in Arris Group see Results of operations 
discontinued operations; partially offset by
    
    loss of $18 related to changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments. In the first half of 2003, other income  net was $152, which primarily included:  
    
    interest income of $38 and dividend income of $10 on our short-term investments;
    
    foreign exchange gains of $95 primarily related to day-to-day transactional activities; and
    
    a payment of $25 received from a settlement related to intellectual property use; partially offset by
    
    adjustments to various sales tax reserves of $19. Interest expense Interest expense decreased $1 in the second quarter of 2004 and decreased $2 in the first half
of 2004 compared to the same periods in 2003 primarily due to a reduction in the outstanding
balances of our notes payable and long-term debt. Our quarterly interest expense in the first quarter of 2004 and the second quarter of 2004 was $32
and $28 respectively. We expect that the quarterly interest expense for the remainder of 2004 will
remain at similar levels. Income tax benefit (expense) In the first half of 2004, we recorded a tax benefit of $2 on pre-tax earnings from continuing
operations before minority interests and equity in net loss of
associated companies of $171. This
tax benefit resulted from the settlement of certain tax audits
partially offset by the draw down of our deferred tax assets and current income tax
provisions in certain taxable jurisdictions and various corporate minimum related income taxes. As of June 30, 2004, we have substantial loss carryforwards and valuation allowances in our
significant tax jurisdictions. These loss carryforwards will serve to minimize our future cash
income related taxes. We will continue to assess the valuation allowance recorded against our
deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis. The valuation allowance is in accordance with SFAS No.
109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires that a tax valuation allowance be established
when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a companys deferred tax assets will
not be realized. Our valuation allowance is primarily attributed to ongoing industry concerns.
Given the magnitude of our valuation allowance, future adjustments to this allowance based on
actual cash results could result in a significant adjustment to our effective tax rate. For
additional information, see Application of critical accounting estimates  Tax asset valuation. Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations As a result of the items discussed above under our Results of operations  continuing
operations, net earnings from continuing operations was $48 in the second quarter of 2004 and was
$164 in the first half of 2004. This amount represented an
improvement of $80 and $369,
respectively, compared to our net loss from continuing operations of $32 and $205, respectively, in
the second quarter of 2003 and the first half of 2003. Results of operations  discontinued operations As of December 31, 2003, we had substantially completed the wind-down of our access solutions
operations. 91




---



##### Table of Contents



In the first half of 2004, there was almost no activity in discontinued operations and we recorded
net earnings from discontinued operations (net of tax) of $7 in the six months ended June 30, 2004. In the first half of 2003, we recorded $125 in net earnings from discontinued operations (net of
tax) primarily related to the following activity:  
    
    a gain of $12 on March 24, 2003 from the sale of 8 million common shares of Arris Group
back to Arris Group for cash consideration of $28 pursuant to a March 11, 2003 agreement.
In addition, on March 18, 2003, we assigned our membership interest in Arris Interactive
LLC, or Arris, to ANTEC Corporation, an Arris Group company, for cash consideration of
$88, resulting in a loss of $2. Also in connection with these transactions, we received
$11 upon the settlement of a sales representation agreement with Arris Group and recorded
a gain of $11. Following the March 2003 transactions, we reduced our interest in Arris
Group to 18.8 percent, and ceased equity accounting for the investment. As a result, we
reclassified our remaining ownership interest in Arris Group as an available-for-sale
investment within continuing operations effective in the second quarter of 2003. We
continue to dispose of our interest in Arris Group, and the gain or loss on the sale of
 shares subsequent to the first quarter of 2003 was included in other
income (expense)  net; and
    
    a gain of $66 in the first quarter of 2003 from the settlement of certain trade and
customer financing receivables, the majority of which was previously provisioned. For additional information, see Discontinued operations in note 17 of the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements and Other income (expense)  net. Liquidity and capital resources Cash flows The following table summarizes our cash flows by activity and cash on hand as of June 30: June 30,2004
    
    
    2003Net cash from (used in) operating activities of continuing operations
    
    $
    (210
    )
    
    $
    151Net cash from (used in) investing activities of continuing operations
    
    
    34
    
    
    
    (37
    )Net cash from (used in) financing activities of continuing operations
    
    
    (107
    )
    
    
    (131
    )Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    (9
    )
    
    
    78Net cash from (used in) continuing operations
    
    
    (292
    )
    
    
    61Net cash from (used in) discontinued operations
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    324Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    (281
    )
    
    
    385Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    
    
    3,928
    
    
    
    3,742Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
    
    $
    3,647
    
    
    $
    4,127
 As of June 30, 2004, our primary source of liquidity was our cash. As of June 30, 2004, we
had cash of $3,647 excluding
$52 of restricted cash and cash equivalents. We believe this cash will be sufficient to fund the
changes to our business model in accordance with the strategic plan (see Business overview  Our
strategic plan and outlook), manage our investments and meet our customer commitments for at least
the next 12 months. However, if capital spending by service providers and other customers changes
from what we currently expect, we may be required to adjust our current business model. As a
result, our revenues and cash flows may be materially lower than we expect and we may be required
to further reduce our investments or take other measures in order to meet our cash requirements.
In the future, we may seek additional funds from liquidity generating transactions and other
sources of external financing. We continue to routinely monitor the capital markets for
opportunities to improve our capital structure and financial flexibility. Our ability and
willingness to access the capital markets is based on many factors including market conditions and
overall financial objectives. Currently our ability is limited due to the impact of the delay in
filing the Reports and the findings of the Independent Review and related matters. We cannot
provide any assurance that our net cash requirements will be as we currently expect, that we will
continue to have access to the EDC Support Facility when and as needed or that liquidity generating
transactions or financings will be available to us on acceptable terms. In addition, we have not
assumed the need 92




---



##### Table of Contents



to make any payments in respect of judgments, settlements, fines or other
penalties in connection with our pending civil litigation or investigations including those related
to the First Restatement and Second Restatement, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or liquidity, other than anticipated professional fees and expenses. See Risk
factors/forward looking statements. In the first half of 2004, our cash flows used in operating activities were $210 due to net
earnings from continuing operations of $164, less net adjustments of $21 for non-cash and other
items and less an adjustment of $353 related to the net change in our operating assets and
liabilities. The use of cash of $353 resulting from the change in our operating assets and
liabilities was primarily due to:  
    
    cash of $10 due to decrease in restricted cash;
    
    net cash of $60 from accounts receivable related primarily to an increase in
collections in the first half of 2004 as a result of the increase in revenues in the first
half of 2004 compared to the first half of 2003; more than offset by
    
    $90 primarily related to product shipments not exceeding additions to inventories during the first half of 2004;
    
    use of cash of $36 related to income taxes;
    
    $139 in restructuring related cash outflows; and
    
    a net decrease of $158 related to accounts payable and accrued liabilities and
other operating assets and liabilities. The net decrease of $158 related to accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other operating
assets and liabilities was mainly a result of:  
    
    payments related to our employee bonus plans;
    
    payments related to our stock-based compensation plans, including restricted stock unit programs;
    
    payments of certain contract manufacturer and supplier accruals;
    
    settlement of certain obligations related to our internal information systems infrastructure;
    
    activities associated with our outsourcing contracts;
    
    reduction of certain customer contract settlement costs;
    
    an increase in accounts payable of approximately $36 due to increased
diligence in paying suppliers in accordance with supply management minimum terms; and
    
    the proportionate decrease in these assets and liabilities as a result of the
decline in the size of our business. As a result of previously incurred tax losses and tax credits, we do not expect that we will have
to make significant cash income tax payments for the foreseeable future. Cash flows from investing activities were $34 and were primarily due to proceeds of $132 from the
sale of certain investments and businesses which we no longer considered strategic including $17
related to the sale of the common shares of Arris Group and $33 related to the sale of the common
shares of Entrust partially offset by an increase of $102 in expenditures for plant and equipment.
Also, we recorded proceeds of $10 primarily from the sale of plant and equipment in the U.S. These
amounts were partially offset by $6 associated with acquisitions of certain investments and
businesses. Cash flows used in financing activities were $107 and were primarily due to $98 used to reduce our
long-term debt, a repayment of capital leases payable of $8, and dividends of $16 paid by us
related to our outstanding preferred shares partially offset by an increase of our notes payable by
a net of $15. The reduction of our long-term debt is primarily due to the extinguishment of debt
of $87 related to the purchase of land and two buildings in the U.S. In the first half of 2004, our cash decreased $9 due to unfavorable effects of changes in foreign
exchange rates. The decrease was primarily a result of unfavorable changes of approximately $13 in
the euro and Australian dollar partially offset by a favorable change of approximately $8 in the
British pound. Also in the first half of 2004, our discontinued operations generated net cash of $11 related to
the continued wind down of our discontinued operations. Uses of liquidity As of June 30, 2004, our cash requirements for the next 12 months are primarily to fund: 93




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    operations;
    
    research and development;
    
    costs relating to workforce reduction and other restructuring activities;
    
    capital expenditures;
    
    debt service;
    
    pension and post-retirement benefits; and
    
    costs in relation to the restatement activities, matters related to the
Independent Review and other related matters, including regulatory and other legal
proceedings. In particular, we are subject to significant pending civil litigation actions and regulatory and
criminal investigations which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and
liquidity by requiring us to pay substantial judgments, settlements, fines or other penalties. See
Risk factors/forward looking statements. Considerable effort and resources have been expended
on our restatement activities in 2004, including the dedicated effort of hundreds of employees and
numerous external consultants and advisors. The estimated costs of our restatement activities in
2004 are approximately $115, which amount is included in SG&A expense in our consolidated
statements of operations in the periods in which the costs are incurred. Also, from time to time, we may purchase our outstanding debt securities and/or convertible notes
in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer or otherwise, in compliance
with applicable laws. As well, we expect to be required to fund some portion of our aggregate
undrawn customer financing commitments. Contractual cash obligations Our contractual cash obligations for long-term debt, purchase obligations, operating leases,
outsourcing contracts, obligations under special charges, pension, post-retirement and
post-employment obligations and other long-term liabilities reflected on the balance sheet remained
substantially unchanged as of June 30, 2004 from the amounts disclosed as of December 31, 2003 in
our 2003 Annual Report. Customer financing Generally, customer financing arrangements may include financing with deferred payment terms
in connection with the sale of our products and services, as well as funding for non-product costs
associated with network installation and integration of our products and services. We may also
provide funding for working capital purposes and equity financing. The following table provides
information related to our customer financing commitments, excluding our discontinued operations as
of: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Drawn and outstanding  gross
    $
    
    369
    
    
    $
    401Provisions for doubtful accounts
    
    
    (278
    )
    
    
    (281
    )Drawn and outstanding  net(a)
    
    
    91
    
    
    
    120Undrawn commitments
    
    
    65
    
    
    
    180Total customer financing
    $
    
    156
    
    
    $
    300
 (a)
    
    Included short-term and long-term amounts. Short-term and long-term amounts were
included in accounts receivable  net and other assets, respectively, in the consolidated
balance sheets.
 In the first half of 2004 and 2003, we entered into certain agreements to restructure and/or
settle various customer financing and related receivables. As a result of these transactions, we
received cash consideration of approximately $15 and $210, respectively, to settle outstanding
receivables with a net carrying value of
approximately $14 and $117, respectively. 94




---



##### Table of Contents



During the first half of 2004 and 2003, we reduced undrawn customer financing commitments by $115
and $131, respectively, as a result of the expiration or cancellation of commitments and changing
customer business plans. On January 8, 2004, we renegotiated an agreement with a certain customer which reduced our
aggregate undrawn customer financing commitments from $180 to $69. We continue to regularly assess the levels of our customer financing provisions based on a
loan-by-loan review to evaluate whether the terms of each loan reflect current market conditions.
We review the ability of our customers to meet their repayment obligations and determine our
provisions accordingly. Commitments to extend future financing generally have conditions for
funding, fixed expiration or termination dates and specific interest rates and purposes. We cannot
predict with certainty the extent to which our customers will satisfy the applicable conditions for
funding, and subsequently request funding, prior to the termination date of the commitments. We
are currently directly supporting most outstanding balances and expect to initially fund any future
commitments in the normal course of business from our working capital. We expect to fund
substantially all of our current remaining undrawn commitments in 2004 or 2005. However, we also
expect that we will be able to arrange for third party lenders to assume these obligations in the
same timeframe. At the end of the first half of 2004, all undrawn commitments were available for
funding under the terms of the financing agreements. Discontinued operations As of June 30, 2004, accruals related to our discontinued access solutions operations totaled
$4 and were related to future contractual obligations and estimated liabilities during the planned
period of disposition. The remaining accruals are expected to be substantially drawn down by cash
payments by the end of 2005. For additional information related to our discontinued operations, see Discontinued operations in
note 17 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. Sources of liquidity Credit facilities Until April 28, 2004, we had $750 in undrawn credit under the Five Year Facilities scheduled
to expire in April 2005. These credit facilities were entered into on April 12, 2000 by us and NNI
and permitted borrowings for general corporate purposes. The Five Year Facilities contained a
financial covenant requiring that our consolidated tangible net worth be not less than $1,888 at
any time. On April 28, 2004, we notified the lenders under the Five Year Facilities that we were
terminating these facilities. Due to our failure to file our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K by
April 29, 2004, the banks, under the Five Year Facilities, would have otherwise been permitted to,
upon 30 days notice, terminate their commitments under the Five Year Facilities. Upon termination,
we were in compliance with that financial covenant and the Five Year Facilities were undrawn. For
additional information relating to the Five Year Facilities and the impact of the termination of
these facilities under the related security agreements, see Developments in 2004  Nortel Networks
Audit Committee Independent Review; restatements; related matters  Credit facilities and security
agreements and Risk factors/forward looking statements. Available support facility On February 14, 2003, we entered into the EDC Support Facility. As of June 30, 2004, the
facility provided for up to $750 in support including:  
    
    $300 of uncommitted revolving support for performance bonds or similar
instruments, of which $205 was utilized;
    
    $150 of uncommitted support for receivables sales and/or securitizations, of
which none was utilized; and
    
    $300 of uncommitted support for performance bonds and/or receivables sales
and/or securitizations, of which $183 was utilized. For additional information related to the EDC Support Facility subsequent to June 30, 2004 and
waivers obtained in connection with certain defaults arising under the EDC Support Facility from
the delay in filing the Reports, see Developments in 2004  Nortel Networks Audit Committee
Independent Review; restatements; related matters  EDC Support Facility and Risk factors/
forward looking statements. 95




---



##### Table of Contents



On March 29, 2004, we and EDC amended the EDC Support Facility to provide that EDC may suspend its
obligation to issue us any additional support if events occur that would have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial position or results of operation. As a result of an amendment on
December 10, 2004, the EDC Support Facility will expire on December 31, 2006. The EDC Support Facility does not materially restrict our ability to sell any of our assets
(subject to certain maximum amounts) or to purchase or pre-pay any of its currently outstanding
debt. The EDC Support Facility can be suspended or terminated if our senior long-term debt rating
by Moodys has been downgraded to less than B3 or if our debt rating by S&P has been downgraded to
less than B. As of June 30, 2004, our obligations under the EDC Support Facility were secured on an equal and
ratable basis under the security agreements entered into by us and various of our subsidiaries that
pledged substantially all of our and NNCs subsidiaries assets in favor of the holders of our
public debt securities and the holders of NNCs 4.25% Convertible Senior Notes. As of June 30,
2004, the security provided under the security agreements was comprised of:  
    
    pledges of substantially all of our assets and those of most of our U.S.
and Canadian subsidiaries; and
    
    guarantees by certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries organized in
Canada, England, Ireland and Hong Kong. If our senior long-term debt rating by Moodys returns to Baa2 (with a stable outlook) and its
rating by S&P returns to BBB (with a stable outlook), the security and guarantees will be released
in full. If the EDC Support Facility is terminated, or expires, the security and guarantees will
also be released in full. We may provide EDC with cash collateral in an amount equal to the total
amount of its outstanding obligations and undrawn commitments and expenses under this facility (or
any other alternative collateral or arrangements acceptable to EDC) in lieu of the security
provided under the security agreements. Accordingly, if the EDC Support Facility is secured by
cash or other alternate collateral or arrangements acceptable to EDC, the security and guarantees
will also be released in full. For information related to our outstanding public debt, see Long-term debt, credit and support
facilities in note 10 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. For
additional financial information related to those subsidiaries providing guarantees as of June 30,
2004, see Supplemental consolidating financial information in note 21 of the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements. For information related to the security pledged,
those subsidiaries providing guarantees and the impact of the termination of the Five Year
Facilities on the related security agreements, subsequent to June 30, 2004, see Developments in
2004  Nortel Networks Audit Committee Independent Review; restatements; related matters  Credit
facilities and security agreements. For information related to our debt ratings, see Credit
ratings below. See Risk factors/ forward looking statements for factors that may affect our
ability to comply with covenants and conditions in our EDC Support Facility in the future. Shelf registration statement and base shelf prospectus In 2002, we and NNC filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC and a base shelf
prospectus with the applicable securities regulatory authorities in Canada, to qualify for the
potential sale of up to $2,500 of various types of securities in the U.S. and/or Canada. The
qualifying securities include guaranteed debt securities of Nortel Networks Limited. As of June 30,
2004, approximately $1,700 under the shelf registration statement and base shelf prospectus has
been utilized. As of June 6, 2004, the Canadian shelf registration expired. Owing to matters
described above in Developments in 2004  Nortel Networks Audit Committee Independent Review;
restatements; related matters with respect to the delayed filing of the Reports, we are currently
unable to utilize the remaining capacity under the SEC shelf registration statement in its current
form. For the same reasons, we are also unable to permit holders of our prepaid forward purchase
contracts to exercise certain early settlement rights and receive Nortel Networks Corporation
common shares in advance of the otherwise applicable August 15, 2005 settlement date. These rights
will again become exercisable upon the effectiveness of a registration statement (or a
post-effective amendment to the shelf registration statement) filed with the SEC (with respect to
the common shares to be delivered) that contains a related current prospectus. Under the terms of
the Purchase Contract and Unit Agreement which governs the purchase contracts, we have agreed to
use commercially reasonable efforts to have, in effect, a registration statement covering the
common shares to be delivered and to provide a prospectus in connection therewith. 96




---



##### Table of Contents



Credit ratings Rating on long-termdebt issued orguaranteed byNortel Networks
    
    
    Rating on preferredLimited/Nortel
    
    
    shares issued byNetworks
    
    
    Nortel NetworksRating agency
    
    Corporation
    
    
    Limited
    
    
    Last changeStandard & Poors Ratings Service
    
    B
    
    
    CCC
    
    April 28, 2004Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
    
    
    B3
    
    
    Caa3
    
    November 1, 2002
 On April 28, 2004, S&P downgraded its ratings on us, including its long-term corporate credit
rating from B to B and its preferred
shares rating from CCC to CCC. At the same time, it
revised its outlook to developing from negative. Moodys outlook changed to review for potential
downgrade from uncertain on April 28, 2004. There can be no assurance that our credit ratings will
not be lowered or that these ratings agencies will not issue adverse commentaries, potentially
resulting in higher financing costs and reduced access to capital markets or alternative financing
arrangements. A reduction in our credit ratings may also affect our ability, and the cost, to
securitize receivables, obtain bid, performance related and other bonds, access the EDC Support
Facility and/or enter into normal course derivative or hedging transactions. Off-balance sheet arrangements Bid, performance related and other bonds We have entered into bid, performance related and other bonds in connection with various
contracts. Bid bonds generally have a term of less than twelve months, depending on the length of
the bid period for the applicable contract. Performance related and other bonds generally have a
term of twelve months and are typically renewed, as required, over the term of the applicable
contract. The various contracts to which these bonds apply generally have terms ranging from two
to five years. Any potential payments which might become due under these bonds would be related to
our non-performance under the applicable contract. Historically, we have not had to make material
payments and we do not anticipate that we will be required to make material payments under these
types of bonds. The following table provides information related to these types of bonds as of: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Bid and performance related bonds(a)
    
    $
    407
    
    
    $
    427Other bonds(b)
    
    
    54
    
    
    
    53Total bid, performance related and other bonds
    
    $
    461
    
    
    $
    480
 (a)
    
    Net of restricted cash and cash equivalents of $3 as of June 30, 2004 and $14 as of December
31, 2003.(b)
    
    Net of restricted cash and cash equivalents of $29 as of June 30, 2004 and $31 as of December
31, 2003.
 The criteria under which bid, performance related and other bonds can be obtained changed due
to the industry environment primarily in 2002 and 2001. During that timeframe, in addition to the
payment of higher fees, we experienced significant cash collateral requirements in connection with
obtaining new bid, performance related and other bonds. Given that the EDC Support Facility is
used to support bid and performance bonds with varying terms, including those with at least 365 day
terms, we will likely need to increase our use of cash collateral to support these obligations
beginning on January 1, 2006 absent a further extension of the facility. The EDC Support Facility provides support for certain obligations under bid and performance related
bonds and has reduced the requirement to provide cash collateral to support these obligations. As
of June 30, 2004, the EDC Support Facility provided for up to $750 in support, of which $300 was
uncommitted support for performance bonds of which $205 was utilized as of June 30, 2004. The
remainder was uncommitted support, subject to certain limitations, for performance bonds,
receivables sales and/or securitizations of which $183 was utilized as of June 30, 2004. Any bid
or performance related bonds with terms that extend beyond December 31, 2006 are currently not
eligible for the support provided by this facility. 97




---



##### Table of Contents



In addition to the support facility with EDC,
our existing security agreements permit us to secure additional obligations under bid and
performance related bonds with the assets pledged under the security agreements and to provide cash
collateral as security for these types of bonds. See Available support facility for additional
information on the EDC Support Facility and the security agreements and see Developments in 2004 
Nortel Networks Audit Committee Independent Review; restatements; related matters  EDC Support
Facility for additional information in connection with amendments to the EDC Support Facility and
developments in connection with the EDC Support Facility and related security agreements subsequent
to June 30, 2004. Receivables securitization and certain lease financing transactions In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued FASB
Interpretation, or FIN, No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities  an Interpretation of
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated
Financial Statements, or FIN 46, and in
December 2003, the FASB issued a revision of FIN 46  FIN 46 (Revised 2003), or FIN 46R. FIN 46R
provides guidance with respect to the consolidation of variable interest entities, or VIEs. VIEs
are characterized as entities in which equity investors do not have a controlling financial
interest or there is not sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities
without additional subordinated financial support. Reporting entities which have a variable
interest in such an entity and are deemed to be the primary beneficiary must consolidate the
variable interest entity. We have conducted certain receivable sales transactions either directly with financial institutions
or with multi-seller conduits. Under some of these agreements, we have continued as servicing
agent and/or have provided limited recourse. The fair value of these retained interests is based
on the market value of servicing the receivables and historical payment patterns, expected cash
flows and appropriate discount rates as applicable. Where we have acted as the servicing agent, we
generally have not recorded an asset or liability related to servicing as the annual servicing fees
were equivalent to those that would have been paid to a third party servicing agent. Also, we have
not historically experienced significant credit losses with respect to receivables sold with
limited recourse. As of June 30, 2004, none of these
arrangements or interests met the requirements for consolidation
under FIN 46R. Additionally, we have agreed to indemnify our counterparties in receivables securitization
transactions. The indemnifications provided to counterparties in these types of transactions may
require us to compensate counterparties for costs incurred as a result of changes in laws and
regulations (including tax legislation) or in the interpretations of such laws and regulations, or
as a result of regulatory penalties that may be suffered by the counterparty as a consequence of
the transaction. Certain receivables securitization transactions include indemnifications
requiring the repurchase of the receivables if the particular transaction becomes invalid. As of
June 30, 2004, we had approximately $252 of securitized receivables which were subject to
repurchase under this provision, in which case, we would assume all rights to collect such
receivables. The indemnification provisions generally expire upon expiration of the securitization
agreements, which extend through 2005, or collection of the receivable amount by the counterparty.
We are generally unable to estimate the maximum potential liability for all of these types of
indemnification guarantees as certain agreements do not specify a maximum amount and the amounts
are dependent upon the outcome of future contingent events, the nature and likelihood of which
cannot be determined at this time. Historically, we have not made any significant indemnification
payments or receivable repurchases under these agreements and no significant liability has been
accrued in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements with respect to the
obligation associated with these guarantees. Other indemnifications or guarantees Through our normal course of business, we have also entered into other indemnifications or
guarantees that arise in various types of arrangements including:  
    
    business sale and business combination agreements;
    
    intellectual property indemnification obligations;
    
    lease agreements;
    
    third party debt agreements;
    
    indemnification of banks and agents under our credit and support facilities and security agreements; and
    
    other indemnification agreements. In the first half of 2004, we did not make any significant payments under any of these
indemnifications or guarantees. In 98




---



##### Table of Contents



certain cases, due to the nature of the agreement, we have not
been able to estimate our maximum potential loss or the maximum potential loss has not been
specified. For additional information, see Guarantees in note 12 of the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements. Application of critical accounting estimates Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and
application of accounting policies generally accepted in the U.S., which require us to make
significant estimates and assumptions. We believe that the following accounting estimates may
involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity in their application and represent our critical
accounting estimates. The application of these estimates requires us to make subjective and
objective judgments. In general, any changes in estimates or assumptions relating to revenue recognition, provisions for
doubtful accounts, provisions for inventory and other contingencies (excluding legal contingencies)
are directly reflected in the results of our reportable operating segments. Changes in estimates or
assumptions pertaining to our tax asset valuations, our pension and post-retirement benefits and
our legal contingencies are generally not reflected in our reportable operating segments, but are
reflected on a consolidated basis. We have discussed the application of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee
of our Board of Directors. There have been no changes to our critical accounting estimates since December 31, 2003, other than
the material changes in the recorded balances and other updates noted below. For further
information related to our critical accounting estimates, see our 2003 Annual Report. Provisions for doubtful accounts In establishing the appropriate provisions for trade, notes and long-term receivables due from
customers, we make assumptions with respect to their future collectibility. Our assumptions are
based on an individual assessment of a customers credit quality as well as subjective factors and
trends, including the aging of receivable balances. Generally, these individual credit assessments
occur prior to the inception of the credit exposure and at regular reviews during the life of the
exposure and consider:  
    
    a customers ability to meet and sustain its financial commitments;
    
    a customers current and projected financial condition;
    
    the positive or negative effects of the current and projected industry outlook; and
    
    the economy in general. Once we consider all of these individual factors, we make a determination as to the probability of
default. An appropriate provision is then made, which takes into consideration the severity of the
likely loss on the outstanding receivable balance based on our experience in collecting these
amounts. In addition to these individual assessments, in general, outstanding trade accounts
receivable amounts that are greater than 365 days are fully provisioned for and amounts greater
than 180 days are 50% provisioned for. In subsequent periods, we may be required to make
adjustments once further information becomes available or actual events occur. As a result, we may
incur significant adjustments to our provisions for trade, notes and long-term receivables. We recorded net receivable recoveries, related to continuing operations, of $3 in the first half of
2004 compared to $97 in the first half of 2003. The receivable provisions recorded in the first
half of 2004 and the first half of 2003 primarily related to normal business activity. The following table summarizes our accounts receivable and long-term receivable balances and
related reserves of our continuing operations as of: 99




---



##### Table of Contents



June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Gross accounts receivable
    
    $
    2,757
    
    
    $
    2,853Provision for doubtful accounts
    
    
    (175
    )
    
    
    (194
    )Accounts receivable  net
    
    $
    2,582
    
    
    $
    2,659Accounts receivable reserves as a percentage of gross accounts receivables
    
    
    6
    %
    
    
    7
    %Gross long-term receivables
    
    $
    389
    
    
    $
    386Provision for doubtful accounts
    
    
    (298
    )
    
    
    (297
    )Net long-term receivables
    
    $
    91
    
    
    $
    89Long-term receivable reserves as a percentage of gross long-term receivables
    
    
    77
    %
    
    
    77
    %
 Provisions for inventory Management must make estimates about the future customer demand for our products when
establishing the appropriate provisions for inventory. When making these estimates, we consider
general economic conditions and growth prospects within our customers ultimate marketplace, and
the market acceptance of our current and pending products. These judgments must be made in the
context of our customers shifting technology needs and changes in the geographic mix of our
customers. With respect to our provisioning policy, in general, we fully reserve for surplus
inventory in excess of our 365 day demand forecast or that we deem to be obsolete. Generally, our
inventory provisions have an inverse relationship with the projected demand for our products. For
example, our provisions usually increase as projected demand decreases due to adverse changes in
the conditions mentioned above. We have experienced significant changes in required provisions in
recent periods due to changes in strategic direction, such as discontinuances of product lines, as
well as declining market conditions. A misinterpretation or misunderstanding of any of these
conditions could result in inventory losses in excess of the provisions determined to be
appropriate as of the balance sheet date. We recorded inventory provisions and other reserves related to our contract manufacturers and
suppliers of $997 as of June 30, 2004 and $1,226 as of December 31, 2003. The decrease in
inventory provisions and other reserves was primarily due to our inventory levels being better
aligned to customer demand. The following table summarizes our inventory balances and other
related reserves of our continuing operations as of: June 30,
    
    
    December 31,2004
    
    
    2003Gross inventory
    
    $
    2,279
    
    
    $
    2,416Inventory provisions
    
    
    (997
    )
    
    
    (1,226
    )Net inventory
    
    $
    1,282
    
    
    $
    1,190Related inventory provisions as a percentage of gross inventory
    
    
    44
    %
    
    
    51
    %Other reserves for claims related to our contract manufacturers and suppliers(a)
    
    $
    (78
    )
    
    $
    (120
    )
 (a)
    
    This amount was included in other accrued liabilities and related to cancellation charges,
contracted for inventory in excess of future demand and the settlement of certain other
claims.
 As of June 30, 2004, our inventory provisions as a percentage of gross inventory was 44%. In
the future, we may be required to make significant adjustments to these provisions for the sale
and/or disposition of inventory that was previously provided for. Customers continued to be cautious with their capital expenditures in 2004. As a result, we will
continue to closely monitor our inventory provisions to ensure that they appropriately reflect the
current market conditions. However, the inventory provisions we have recorded in the past may not
be reflective of those in future quarters. 100




---



##### Table of Contents



Income taxes Tax asset valuation Our net deferred tax assets balance, excluding discontinued operations, was $3,517 as of June
30, 2004 and $3,576 as of December 31, 2003. The $59 decrease was primarily due to the drawdown of
deferred tax assets in certain jurisdictions and the impact of foreign exchange effects related
primarily to the Canadian dollar and the British pound. We currently have deferred tax assets
resulting from net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards and deductible temporary
differences, all of which are available to reduce future taxes payable in our significant tax
jurisdictions. Generally, our loss carryforward periods range from seven years to an indefinite
period. As a result, we do not expect that a significant portion of these carryforwards will
expire in the near future. We assess the realization of these deferred tax assets quarterly to determine whether an income tax
valuation allowance is required. Based on available evidence, both positive and negative, we
determine whether it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the remaining net deferred
tax assets will be realized. The main factors that we consider include:  
    
    cumulative losses in recent years;
    
    history of loss carryforwards and other tax assets expiring;
    
    the carryforward period associated with the deferred tax assets;
    
    the nature of the income that can be used to realize the deferred tax assets;
    
    our net earnings/loss; and
    
    future earnings potential determined through the use of internal forecasts. In evaluating the positive and negative evidence, the weight given to each type of evidence must be
proportionate to the extent to which it can be objectively verified. If it is our belief that it
is more likely than not that some portion of these assets will not be realized, an income tax
valuation allowance is recorded. In the first half of 2004, our gross income tax valuation allowances decreased to $3,102 as of June
30, 2004 compared to $3,108 as of December 31, 2003. The decrease was primarily due to foreign
exchange and a drawdown of the valuation allowance against a portion of
the current period earnings offset by certain other adjustments. We assessed positive evidence including forecasts of future taxable
income to support realization of the net deferred tax assets, and negative evidence including our
cumulative loss position, and concluded that the valuation allowances as of June 30, 2004 were
appropriate. If market conditions deteriorate further or future results of operations are less than expected,
future assessments may result in a determination that some or all of the net deferred tax assets
are not realizable. As a result, we may need to establish an additional tax valuation allowance
for all or a portion of the net deferred tax assets, which may have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition. Alternatively, if our future results
of operations are better than expected, these assessments may result in the reduction of our
valuation allowances. Given the magnitude of our valuation allowance, future adjustments to this
allowance based on actual results could result in a significant adjustment to our net earnings. Accounting changes and recent accounting pronouncements Accounting changes Our unaudited consolidated financial statements are based on the selection and application of
U.S. GAAP. For more information related to the accounting policies that we adopted as a result of
new accounting standards, see Accounting changes in note 3 of the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements. There were no accounting changes in the first quarter of 2004.
In the second quarter of 2004, we adopted FASB Staff Position FAS 106-2, Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
Act of 2004 which resulted in a decrease of $31 in our accrued post-retirement benefit obligation. The following summarizes the accounting changes that we adopted in the first half of 2003: 101




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    Stock-based compensation  we adopted SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation  Transition and Disclosure  an Amendment of
FASB Statement No. 123 which
amended the transitional provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based
Compensation, for companies electing to recognize employee stock-based compensation
using the fair value based method. Effective January 1, 2003 we elected to expense
employee stock-based compensation using the fair value based method prospectively for
all awards granted, modified, or settled on or after January 1, 2003. The impact of
the adoption of the fair value based method for expense recognition of employee awards
resulted in $8 and $12 (net of tax of nil) of stock option expense for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.
    
    Asset retirement obligations  we adopted SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations, or SFAS 143, which resulted in an increase to net loss of $12 (net of tax of nil) which has been reported as a cumulative effect of
accounting changes  net of tax, an increase in plant and equipment  net of $4 and an
asset retirement obligation liability of $16 as of January 1, 2003. The adoption of
SFAS 143 did not have a material impact on depreciation and accretion expense or basic
and diluted earnings (loss) per share.
    
    Accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of both
liabilities and equity  we adopted SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity
which did not have a
material impact on our results of operations and financial condition. SFAS 150 is
effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and
otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after
June 15, 2003. Recent accounting pronouncements On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of
2003, or the MPDIM Act, was signed into law in the U.S. The MPDIM Act introduced a prescription
drug benefit under Medicare (specifically, Medicare Part D) as well as a federal subsidy to
sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially
equivalent to Medicare Part D. As permitted by FASB Staff Position, or FSP, Financial Accounting
Standard, or FAS 106-1, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, we chose to make the one-time
deferral election which remained in effect for our plans in the U.S. until the earlier of the
issuance of specific authoritative guidance by the FASB on how to account for the federal subsidy
to be provided to plan sponsors under the MPDIM Act, or the remeasurement of plan assets and
obligations subsequent to January 31, 2004. Therefore, our post-retirement benefit obligation as
of December 31, 2003 and net post-retirement benefit cost for the year ended December 31, 2003 did
not reflect the effects of the MPDIM Act on the plans. On May 19, 2004, FSP FAS 106-2, Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and
Modernization Act of 2003, or FSP FAS 106-2, was issued by the FASB to provide guidance relating
to the prescription drug subsidy provided by the MPDIM Act. We expect to have portions of our
post-retirement benefit plans qualify as actuarially equivalent to the benefit provided under the
MPDIM Act, for which it expects to receive federal subsidies. We expect that other portions of the
plans will not be actuarially equivalent. The financial impact of the federal subsidies was
determined by remeasuring our retiree life and medical obligation as of January 1, 2004, as
provided under the retroactive application provision of FSP FAS 106-2. The effective date of FSP
FAS 106-2 is the first annual or interim period beginning after June 15, 2004, with earlier
adoption encouraged. We adopted FSP FAS 106-2 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004. As
a result of adoption, the accrued post-retirement benefit obligation decreased by $31. Net
periodic post-retirement benefit costs are expected to decrease by $2 for 2004, as a result of the
subsidy. In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, reached consensus on Issue No. 03-1, The
Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments, or EITF
03-1. EITF 03-1 provides guidance on
determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than
temporary and the measurement of an impairment loss. EITF 03-1 is applicable to marketable debt
and equity securities within the scope of SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities, or SFAS 115, and SFAS No. 124, Accounting for Certain Investments Held by
Not-for-Profit Organizations, and equity securities that are not subject to the scope of SFAS 115
and not accounted for under the equity method of accounting. In September 2004, the FASB issued
FSP EITF 03-1-1, Effective Date of Paragraphs 10-20 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments , which delays the
effective date for the measurement and recognition criteria contained in EITF 03-1 until final
application guidance is issued. The delay does not suspend the requirement to recognize
other-than-temporary impairments as required by existing authoritative literature. The adoption of
EITF 03-1 is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations and financial
position. 102




---



##### Table of Contents



Canadian supplement New Canadian securities regulations allow issuers that are required to file reports with the
SEC, upon meeting certain conditions, to satisfy their Canadian continuous disclosure obligations
by using financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We have provided the
following supplemental information to highlight the significant differences that would have
resulted in the MD&A had it been prepared using Canadian GAAP information. The principal continuing reconciling differences that affect consolidated net earnings (loss) under
Canadian GAAP are derivative accounting, financial instruments and goodwill impairment arising from
historical differences in carrying value. We adopted new Canadian accounting standards for asset
retirement obligations in 2004 and for stock option compensation in 2003 that are substantially
consistent with U.S. GAAP. Other historical differences between U.S. GAAP and Canadian GAAP were
primarily due to facts and circumstances related to prior years that are not expected to affect
future earnings (loss) under Canadian GAAP, including business combinations. See note 20 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation
from U.S GAAP to Canadian GAAP, including a description of the material differences affecting our
consolidated statements of operations and consolidated balance sheets. There were no significant
differences affecting the consolidated statements of cash flows. Market risk Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our unaudited consolidated financial
statements through adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Our market risk exposure
results primarily from fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To manage the
risk from these fluctuations, we enter into various derivative-hedging transactions that we have
authorized under our policies and procedures. We maintain risk management control systems to
monitor market risks and counterparty risks. These systems rely on analytical techniques including
both sensitivity analysis and value-at-risk estimations. We do not hold or issue financial
instruments for trading purposes. For a discussion of our accounting policies for derivative financial instruments, see Accounting
changes in note 3(d) of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. Additional
disclosure of our financial instruments is included in Financial instruments and hedging
activities in note 11 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. We manage foreign exchange exposures using forward and option contracts to hedge sale and purchase
commitments. Our most significant foreign exchange exposures are in the Canadian dollar, the
British pound and the euro. We enter into U.S. to Canadian dollar forward and option contracts
intended to hedge the U.S. to Canadian dollar exposure on future revenues and expenditure streams.
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, we recognize the gains and losses on the effective portion of
these contracts in income when the hedged transaction occurs. Any ineffective portion of these
contracts is recognized in income immediately. We expect to continue to expand our business globally and, as such, expect that an increasing
proportion of our business may be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. As a result,
fluctuations in foreign currencies may have a material impact on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. We try to minimize the impact of such currency fluctuations
through our ongoing commercial practices and by attempting to hedge our major currency exposures.
In attempting to manage this foreign exchange risk, we identify operations and transactions that
may have exposure based upon the excess or deficiency of foreign currency receipts over foreign
currency expenditures. Given our exposure to international markets, we regularly monitor all of
our material foreign currency exposures. We cannot predict whether we will incur foreign exchange
gains or losses in the future. However, if significant foreign exchange losses are experienced,
they could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. A portion of our long-term debt is subject to changes in fair value resulting from changes in
market interest rates. We have hedged a portion of this exposure to interest rate volatility using
fixed for floating interest rate swaps. The change in fair value of the swaps are recognized in
earnings with offsetting amounts related to the change in the fair value of the hedged debt
attributable to interest rate changes. Any ineffective portion of the swaps is recognized in
income immediately. We record net settlements on these swap instruments as adjustments to interest
expense. Historically, we have managed interest rate exposures, as they relate to interest expense, using a
diversified portfolio of fixed and floating rate instruments denominated in several major
currencies. We use sensitivity analysis to measure our interest rate risk. The sensitivity
analysis includes cash, our outstanding floating rate long-term debt and any outstanding
instruments 103




---



##### Table of Contents



that convert fixed rate long-term debt to floating rate. Equity price risk The values of our equity investments in several publicly traded companies are subject to
market price volatility. These investments are generally in companies in the technology industry
sector and are classified as available for sale. We typically do not attempt to reduce or
eliminate the market exposure on these investment securities. We also hold certain derivative
instruments or warrants that are subject to market price volatility because their value is based on
the common share price of a publicly traded company. These derivative instruments are generally
acquired through business acquisitions or divestitures. In addition, derivative instruments may
also be purchased to hedge exposure to certain compensation obligations that vary based on future
Nortel Networks Corporation common share prices. We do not hold equity securities or derivative
instruments for trading purposes. Environmental matters We are subject to numerous environmental protection laws and regulations in various
jurisdictions around the world, primarily due to manufacturing operations. As a result, we are
exposed to liabilities and compliance costs arising from our past and current generation,
management and disposition of hazardous substances and wastes. We have remedial activities under way at twelve of our facilities which are either currently
occupied or were previously owned or occupied. We have also been listed as a potentially
responsible party at six Superfund sites in the U.S. An estimate of our anticipated remediation
costs associated with all such facilities and sites, to the extent probable and reasonably
estimable, is included in our environmental accruals in an approximate amount of $30. For a discussion of
Environmental matters, see Contingencies in note 18 of
the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. Legal proceedings Nortel Networks and/or certain of our directors and officers have been named as defendants in
various class action lawsuits. We are unable to determine the ultimate aggregate amount of
monetary liability or financial impact to us in these legal matters, which unless otherwise
specified, seek damages from the defendants of material or indeterminate amounts. We are also a
defendant in various other suits, claims, proceedings and investigations which are in the normal
course of business. We cannot determine whether these matters will, individually or collectively,
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and
liquidity. We, and any of our named directors or officers, intend to vigorously defend these
actions, suits, claims, proceedings and investigations. We are also subject to significant pending
civil litigation and ongoing regulatory and criminal investigations in the U.S. and Canada which
could require us to pay substantial judgments, settlements, fines or other penalties. For
additional information related to our legal proceedings, see Contingencies in note 18 of the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, the Legal Proceedings section of this
report and Risk factors/forward looking statements. Risk factors/forward looking statements You should carefully consider the risks described below before investing in our securities.
The risks described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks not currently known to
us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also
impair our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Unless required by
applicable securities laws, we do not have any intention or obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Certain statements in this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Qcontain words such as could, expects,
may, anticipates, believes, intends, estimates, plans, envisions, seeks and other
similar language and are considered forward looking statements. These statements are based on our
current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the operating environment,
economies and markets in which we operate. In addition, other written or oral statements which are
considered forward looking may be made by us or others on our behalf. These statements are subject
to important risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict and the actual
outcome may be materially different. In particular, the risks described below could cause actual
events to differ materially from those contemplated in forward 104




---



##### Table of Contents



looking statements. Risks relating to our restatements and related matters Our two restatements of our consolidated financial statements and related events have had, and
will continue to have, a material adverse effect on us. In May 2003, we commenced certain balance sheet reviews at the direction of certain members of
former management that led to the Comprehensive Review, which resulted in the First Restatement.
In late October 2003, the Audit Committee initiated the Independent Review and engaged WCPHD to
advise it in connection with the Independent Review. The Audit Committee sought to gain a full
understanding of the events that caused significant excess liabilities to be maintained on the
balance sheet that needed to be restated, and to recommend that our Board of Directors adopt, and
direct management to implement, necessary remedial measures to address personnel, controls,
compliance and discipline. As the Independent Review progressed, the Audit Committee directed new
corporate management to examine in depth the concerns identified by WCPHD regarding provisioning
activity and to review certain provision releases. That examination, and other errors identified by
management, led to the Second Restatement and our revision of previously announced unaudited
results for the year ended December 31, 2003. The need for the Second Restatement resulted in
delays in filing the Reports. Over the course of the Second Restatement process, management identified certain accounting
practices that it determined should be adjusted as part of the Second Restatement. In particular,
management identified certain errors related to revenue recognition and undertook a process of
revenue reviews. In light of the resulting adjustments to revenues previously reported, the Audit
Committee has determined to review the facts and circumstances leading to the restatement of these
revenues for specific transactions identified in the Second Restatement. The review will have a
particular emphasis on the underlying conduct that led to the initial recognition of these
revenues. The Audit Committee will seek a full understanding of the historic events that required
the revenues for these specific transactions to be restated and will consider any appropriate
additional remedial measures, including those involving internal controls and processes. The Audit
Committee has engaged WCPHD to advise it in connection with this review. For more information on the Comprehensive Review, Independent Review, First Restatement, Second
Restatement and Revenue Independent Review, see the MD&A and Controls and Procedures sections
of this report. As a result of these events, we have become subject to the following key risks, each of which is
described in more detail below. Each of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.  
    
    We are subject to ongoing regulatory and criminal investigations in the
U.S. and Canada, which could require us to pay substantial fines or other penalties.
    
    We are subject to significant pending civil litigation, which if decided
against us, could require us to pay substantial judgments, settlements or other
penalties.
    
    Material adverse legal judgments, fines, penalties or settlements could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial
condition and liquidity, which could be very significant.
    
    We cannot predict the outcome of the Revenue Independent Review being
undertaken by our Audit Committee.
    
    We and our independent auditors have identified a number of material
weaknesses related to our internal control over financial reporting, which could
continue to impact our ability to report our results of operations and financial
condition accurately and in a timely manner.
    
    The governing principles of the Independent Review particularly as they
relate to remedial measures may take time to implement.
    
    The delayed filing of our Reports and related matters caused us to breach
our public debt indentures and seek waivers from EDC under the EDC Support Facility,
which may affect our liquidity. The continuing delays in filing certain of our Reports
and related matters has resulted in a continuing breach of our public debt indentures
and our obligations under the EDC Support Facility. It is possible that the holders of
our public debt will seek to 105




---



##### Table of Contents



accelerate the maturity of that debt and EDC will not
grant us additional waivers.
    
    Our credit ratings have been downgraded, we are currently unable to access
our shelf registration statement filed with the SEC and we terminated the Five Year
Facilities, each of which may affect our liquidity.
    
    The delay in filing certain of our Reports could cause the TSX and/or the
NYSE to commence suspension or delisting procedures in respect of Nortel Networks
Corporations common shares or other of our or NNCs listed securities.
    
    Continuing negative publicity may adversely affect our business and the
market price of our publicly traded securities.
    
    We may not be able to attract or retain the personnel necessary to achieve our business objectives.
    
    Ongoing SEC review may require us to amend our public disclosures further. We are subject to ongoing regulatory and criminal investigations in the U.S. and Canada which could
require us to pay substantial fines or other penalties. We are under investigation by the SEC and the OSC. On April 5, 2004, NNC announced that the SEC
had issued a formal order of investigation in connection with our and NNCs previous restatement of
financial results for certain periods and NNCs announcements in March 2004 regarding the likely
need to revise certain previously announced results and restate previously filed financial results
for one or more earlier periods. On April 13, 2004, NNC announced that it had received a letter from the staff of the OSC advising
of an OSC Enforcement Staff investigation into the same matters that are the subject of the SEC
investigation. NNC has also received a U.S. federal grand jury subpoena for the production of certain documents
sought in connection with an ongoing criminal investigation being conducted by the U.S. Attorneys
Office for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. Further, the Integrated Market
Enforcement Team of the RCMP has advised NNC that it would be commencing a criminal investigation
into our financial accounting situation. Our senior management and Board of Directors have been required to devote significant time to these
investigations and related matters. We cannot predict when these investigations will be completed,
nor can we predict what the results of these investigations may be. Expenses incurred in connection
with these investigations (which include substantial fees of lawyers and other professional
advisors and potential obligations to indemnify officers and directors who may be parties to such
actions) could adversely affect our cash position. We may be required to pay material fines,
consent to injunctions on future conduct or suffer other penalties, each of which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
The investigations may adversely affect our ability to obtain, and/or increase the cost of
obtaining, directors and officers liability insurance and/or other types of insurance, which
could have a material adverse affect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition. In addition, the findings and outcomes of the Independent Review and the Revenue
Independent Review and the regulatory and criminal investigations may affect the course of the
civil litigation pending against us, which are more fully described below. The effects and results of these or other investigations may have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. We are subject to significant pending civil litigation, which if decided against us, could require
us to pay substantial judgments, settlements or other penalties. In addition to being subject to litigation in the ordinary course of business, we are currently,
and may in the future be, subject to class actions, other securities litigation and other actions
arising in relation to our accounting restatements. Subsequent to NNCs March 10, 2004
announcement of the likely need for the Second Restatement, numerous class action complaints,
including ERISA class action complaints and a derivative action complaint, have been filed against
us and NNC and certain current and former officers and directors. We expect that this litigation will be time consuming, expensive and distracting from the conduct
of our daily business. The adverse resolution of any specific lawsuit could have a material adverse
effect on our ability to favorably resolve other lawsuits and on our financial condition and
liquidity. We are unable at this time to estimate what our ultimate liability in 106




---



##### Table of Contents



these matters may
be, and it is possible that we will be required to pay substantial judgments, settlements or other
penalties and incur expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity, and such effects could be very significant.
Expenses incurred in connection with these investigations (which include substantial fees of
lawyers and other professional advisors and potential obligations to indemnify officers and
directors who may be parties to such actions) could adversely affect our cash position. We cannot predict the outcome of the Revenue Independent Review being undertaken by our Audit
Committee. As discussed in greater detail in the Controls and Procedures section of this report, our Audit
Committee initiated the Revenue Independent Review to achieve a full understanding of the historic
events that required revenues for certain specific transactions to be restated. The Revenue
Independent Review will have a particular emphasis on the underlying conduct that led to the
initial recognition of these revenues. The review will also consider any appropriate additional
remedial measures, including those involving internal controls and processes. The Audit Committee
has engaged WCPHD to advise it in connection with this review. We cannot predict the outcome of
the Revenue Independent Review. Material adverse legal judgments, fines, penalties or settlements could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and liquidity, which could be very significant. We estimate that our available cash and our cash flow from operations will be adequate to fund our
operations and service our debt for at least the next 12 months. In making this estimate, we have
not assumed the need to make any payments in connection with our pending civil litigation or
investigations including those related to the First Restatement and Second Restatement, other than
our anticipated professional fees and expenses. Any material adverse legal judgments, fines,
penalties or settlements arising from the pending civil litigation and investigations could require
additional funding which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. This
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition
and liquidity, including by:  
    
    requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash and/or cash flow from
operations to payments of such judgments, fines, penalties or settlements, thereby reducing
the availability of our cash and/or cash flow to fund working capital, capital
expenditures, R&D efforts and other general corporate purposes, including debt reduction;
    
    making it more difficult for us to satisfy our payment obligations with respect to our outstanding indebtedness;
    
    increasing the difficulty and/or cost to us of refinancing our indebtedness;
    
    increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
    
    limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our businesses and
the industries in which we operate;
    
    making it more difficult for us to make acquisitions and investments;
    
    limiting our ability to obtain, and/or increase the cost of obtaining, directors and
officers liability insurance and/or other types of insurance; and
    
    restricting our ability to introduce new technologies and products and/or exploit
business opportunities. We and our independent auditors have identified a number of material weaknesses related to our
internal control over financial reporting, which could continue to impact our ability to report our
results of operations and financial condition accurately and in a timely manner. Two material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting were identified at the
time of the First Restatement. Over the course of Second Restatement, we and D&T identified a
number of additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. D&T
confirmed to the Audit Committee these material weaknesses, listed below, on January 10, 2005:  
    
    lack of compliance with written Nortel Networks procedures for monitoring and adjusting
balances related to certain accruals and provisions, including restructuring charges and
contract and customer accruals; 107




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    lack of compliance with Nortel Networks procedures for applying applicable GAAP to the
initial recording of certain liabilities, including those described in SFAS No. 5, and to
foreign currency translation as described in SFAS No. 52;
    
    lack of sufficient personnel with appropriate knowledge, experience and training in
U.S. GAAP and lack of sufficient analysis and documentation of the application of U.S.
GAAP to transactions, including but not limited to revenue transactions;
    
    lack of a clear organization and accountability structure within the accounting
function, including insufficient review and supervision, combined with financial reporting
systems that are not integrated and which require extensive manual interventions;
    
    lack of sufficient awareness of, and timely and appropriate remediation of, internal
control issues by Nortel Networks personnel; and
    
    an inappropriate tone at the top, which contributed to the lack of a strong control
environment; as reported in the Independent Review Summary referred to in the Controls
and Procedures section of this report, there was a Management tone at the top that
conveyed the strong leadership message that earnings targets could be met through
application of accounting practices that finance managers knew or ought to have known were
not in compliance with U.S. GAAP and that questioning these practices was not acceptable. Upon completion of managements assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004 pursuant to SOX 404, we currently expect to conclude that the first five of these
six material weaknesses continue to exist as of December 31, 2004, and we continue to identify,
develop and begin to implement remedial measures to address them. These material weaknesses, if not
fully addressed, could result in accounting errors such as those underlying the restatements of our
consolidated financial statements more fully discussed in Developments in 2004  Nortel Networks
Audit Committee Independent Review; restatements; related matters in the MD&A and Controls and
Procedures section of this report. While our Board of Directors has approved the adoption of all
of the recommendations for remedial measures contained in the Summary of Findings and of
Recommended Remedial Measures of the Independent Review referred to in the Controls and
Procedures section of this report, and our management has adopted a number of measures to
strengthen our internal control over financial reporting and address the material weaknesses
identified above, we may be unable to address such material weaknesses in a timely manner, which
could adversely impact the accuracy and timeliness of future reports and filings we make with the
SEC and OSC. In addition, starting with our fiscal year 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we must comply with
Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the related SEC rules, which require
management to assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting annually
and to include in our Annual Report on Form 10-K a management report on that assessment, together
with an attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm. In light of the material
weaknesses identified in connection with the First Restatement and Second Restatement, our
management expects to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2004 is ineffective, and D&T has advised us that they expect their report on managements
assessment of internal control over financial reporting also to indicate that internal control over
financial reporting is ineffective. While we are implementing steps to ensure the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting, failure to restore the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting could continue to impact our ability to report our financial
condition and results of operations accurately and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. The governing principles of the Independent Review for remedial measures may take time to
implement. As a result of the Independent Review, a number of significant remedial steps have been identified
as necessary to improve our process and procedures. These remedial steps may take time to
implement. In addition, the process of implementing the governing principles of the Independent
Review may be time consuming for our senior management and disrupt our business. The delayed filing of our Reports and related matters caused us to breach our public debt
indentures and seek waivers from EDC under the EDC Support Facility, which may affect our
liquidity. Continuing delays in filing certain of our Reports and related matters has resulted in a
breach of our public debt indentures and our obligations under the EDC Support Facility. It is
possible that the holders of our public debt will seek to accelerate the maturity of that debt and
EDC will not grant us additional waivers. As a result of the delayed filing of our Reports, we and NNC breached our obligations to deliver
the Reports to the trustees under our and NNCs public debt indentures. While continuing delays
in filing certain of our Reports will not result in an automatic event of default and acceleration
of the outstanding debt, if holders of 25% of the outstanding principal amount of any relevant
series of debt securities provide notice of this non-compliance and we or NNC, as applicable, fail
to file and 108




---



##### Table of Contents



deliver the relevant Report within 90 days after the notice is provided, then the
trustee under the indenture or the holders will have the right to accelerate the maturity of the
relevant series of debt securities. While such notice could have been given any time after March
30, 2004, neither we nor NNC has received a notice as of the date of this report. If the required
percentage of holders under one series of debt securities were to give such a notice and, after the
90 day cure period expired, were to accelerate the maturity of such series of debt securities, then
the principal amount of each other series of debt securities could,
upon 10 days notice, be
accelerated without the lapse of an additional 90 day cure period. If an acceleration of our debt
securities were to occur, we may be unable to meet our payment obligations. As previously reported, based on publicly available information as of January 10, 2005, we have
reason to believe that more than 25% of the outstanding principal amount of the $150 of 7.875%
notes due June 2026 issued by one of our subsidiaries and guaranteed by us are held by one holder, or a
group of related holders. Other than with respect to that series of debt securities, based on such
publicly available information, neither we nor NNC are aware of any holder, or group of related
holders, that holds at least 25% of the outstanding principal amount of any relevant series of debt
securities. However, based on such publicly available information, we have reason to believe that
there is sufficient concentration among holders of the $150 of 7.40% notes due June 2006 issued by
us that the acquisition of a relatively small additional amount of these notes by certain holders
could result in a holder or a group of related holders holding 25% or more of the outstanding
principal amount of these notes. See Liquidity and capital resources. As a result of the delayed filing of our Reports and the Related Breaches, we were also required to
seek waivers from EDC under the EDC Support Facility. Our continuing delays in filing certain of
our Reports will require us to seek an additional waiver from EDC. EDC may not grant an additional
waiver or the terms of such a waiver may be unfavorable. If we do not obtain an additional waiver
from EDC, EDC would have the right to terminate the EDC Support Facility, require cash collateral,
or exercise its rights against the collateral pledged under the related security agreements. In
addition, the Related Breaches will continue beyond the filing of the Reports. Accordingly, EDC
will have the right (absent a further waiver of the Related Breaches) to terminate or suspend the
EDC Support Facility notwithstanding the filing of the Reports beginning on February 15, 2005.
While we are seeking a permanent waiver from EDC in connection with the Related Breaches, there can
be no assurance that we will receive such waiver, or any waiver or as to the terms of any such
waiver. Any future delay in the filing of our periodic reports with the SEC would similarly result in a
breach of our public debt indentures and require us to seek additional waivers from EDC under the
EDC Support Facility, which could reduce our access to the EDC Support Facility and may adversely
affect our liquidity. Our credit ratings have been downgraded, we are currently unable to access our shelf registration
statement filed with the SEC and NNC terminated the Five Year Facilities, each of which may
adversely affect our liquidity. On April 28, 2004, S&P downgraded its ratings of us, including its long-term corporate credit
rating from B to B and its preferred
share rating from CCC to CCC. At the same time, it
revised its outlook to developing from negative. Moodys current long-term debt rating for us is
B3 and its preferred share rating is Caa3. On April 28, 2004, Moodys changed its outlook to
potential downgrade from uncertain. These ratings are below investment grade. Our credit ratings
could be lowered or rating agencies could issue adverse commentaries in the future, which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and
liquidity. These ratings and our current credit condition affect, among other things, our ability
to raise debt, access the commercial paper market (which is currently closed to us), engage in
alternative financing arrangements, and affect our ability, and the cost to securitize receivables,
obtain customer bid, performance-related and other bonds and contracts, access the EDC Support
Facility and/or enter into normal course derivative or hedging transactions and also affect the
price of our stock. As a result of a ratings downgrade in 2002, security agreements became effective under which
substantially all of our assets located in the U.S. and Canada and those of most of our U.S. and
Canadian subsidiaries, including the shares of certain of our U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries, were
pledged. In addition, certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries have guaranteed our obligations
under the EDC Support Facility and our and NNCs outstanding debt securities. These agreements
will continue to secure the EDC Support Facility and our and NNCs outstanding public debt until
the EDC Support Facility expires, alternative collateral is provided, alternative arrangements are
made, or our public debt ratings return to at least BBB (stable outlook) by S&P and Baa2 (stable
outlook) by Moodys. The continued existence of these security arrangements may adversely affect
our ability to incur additional debt or obtain alternative financing arrangements. In addition,
EDC is not obligated to make any support available under the EDC Support Facility if our senior
long-term rating by Moodys is downgraded to less than B3 or if its debt rating by S&P is
downgraded to less than B. In addition, in April 2004, NNL terminated the Five Year Facilities. Absent this termination, the
banks would have been permitted, upon 30 days notice, to terminate their commitments under the
Five Year Facilities as a result of our failure to file 109




---



##### Table of Contents



our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K by
April 29, 2004. Although the Five Year Facilities were undrawn at termination, this termination
may adversely affect our liquidity. Further, the delayed filing of the Reports has resulted in our inability to use, in its current
form, the remaining approximately $800 of capacity under our shelf registration statement filed
with the SEC for various types of securities. As a result, our ability to access the capital
markets is constrained, which may adversely affect our liquidity. The delay in filing certain of our Reports could cause the Toronto Stock Exchange and/or the New
York Stock Exchange to commence suspension or delisting procedures in respect of Nortel Networks
Limiteds common shares or other of our or NNCs listed securities. Although we have filed our and NNCs 2003 Annual Reports, the delayed filing of our 2004 Quarterly
Reports causes us to continue to be in breach of these listing requirements. Although each of the
NYSE and TSX has verbally confirmed that it has not commenced, nor has any intention of commencing,
any suspension or delisting procedures in respect of our and NNCs listed securities at the date of
this report, the commencement of any suspension or delisting procedures by either exchange remains,
at all times, at the discretion of such exchange and would be publicly announced by the exchange.
Pending the filing of our and NNCs 2003 Annual Reports, the NYSE had permitted our and NNCs
listed securities to continue to be traded on the exchange for the three month period ended March 31, 2005. In exercising the discretion relating to the grant of that additional three month period
and the continued listing of our and NNCs securities in light of the delayed filing of our 2004
Quarterly Reports, the NYSEs procedures provide that the NYSE would consider, among other things,
the likelihood of the relevant Reports being filed, the
Companys and NNCs general financial
status and the frequency and detail of the Companys and NNCs ongoing disclosures to the market on
the status of such filings. If a suspension or delisting were to occur, there would be significantly less liquidity in the
suspended or delisted securities. In addition, our ability to raise additional necessary capital
through equity or debt financing, and attract and retain personnel by means of equity compensation,
would be greatly impaired. Furthermore, with respect to any suspended or delisted securities, we
would expect decreases in institutional and other investor demand, analyst coverage, market making
activity and information available concerning trading prices and volume, and fewer broker-dealers
would be willing to execute trades with respect to such securities. A suspension or delisting would
likely decrease the attractiveness of our common shares or other listed securities of Nortel
Network Limited and NNC to investors and cause the trading volume of
Nortel Networks Corporation common shares or other
listed securities of Nortel Network Limited and NNC to decline, which could result in a decline in
the market price of such securities. Continuing negative publicity may adversely affect our business. As a result of the First Restatement and Second Restatement, we have been the subject of continuing
negative publicity. This negative publicity has contributed to significant declines in the prices
of our publicly traded securities. This negative publicity may have an effect on the terms under
which some customers and suppliers are willing to continue to do business with us and could affect
our financial performance or financial condition. We also believe that many of our employees are
operating under stressful conditions, which reduce morale and could lead to increased employee
turnover. Continuing negative publicity could have a material adverse effect on our business and
the market price of our publicly traded securities. As a result of the delay in the filing of our 2003 Annual Report (containing our audited
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003), we were required to apply
to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for an order permitting the postponement of our 2004
Annual Shareholders Meeting. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted that
order, which permitted us to extend the time for calling the meeting to a date not later than
December 31, 2004, or such later date as the Court may permit. As a result of the continued delay
in the filing of our 2003 Annual Report, in October 2004 we announced that we intended to seek a
further order extending the time for calling the meeting to a date no later than March 31, 2005,
which order the Court granted on December 10, 2004. A further extension to a date no later than
May 31, 2005 was obtained from the Court on December 21, 2004 to permit us to comply with a
specific SEC rule which would require us in our circumstances, to provide to shareholders our 2004
audited financial statements either prior to or concurrently with the mailing of proxy materials
for the Meeting. This postponement has, among other things, contributed to the continuing negative
publicity related to us, which may adversely affect our business and the market price of our
publicly traded securities. 110




---



##### Table of Contents



We may not be able to attract or retain the personnel necessary to achieve our business objectives. Competition for certain key positions and specialized technical personnel in the high-technology
industry remains strong. Our future success depends in part on our continued ability to hire,
assimilate in a timely manner and retain qualified personnel, particularly in key senior management
positions and in our key areas of potential growth. An important factor in attracting and
retaining qualified employees is our ability to provide employees with the opportunity to
participate in the potential growth of our business through programs such as stock option plans,
restricted stock unit plans and employee investment and share purchase plans. The scope and value
of these programs will be adversely affected by the volatility or negative performance of the
market price for our common shares. In connection with the delay in filing our 2003 Annual Reports, as of March 10, 2004, NNC suspended
the purchase of Nortel Networks Corporation common shares under the stock purchase plans for
eligible employees in eligible countries that facilitate the acquisition of Nortel Networks
Corporation common shares; the exercise of outstanding options granted under the 2000 Plan or the
1986 Plan, or the grant of any additional options under those plans, or the exercise of outstanding
options granted under employee stock option plans previously assumed by us in connection with
mergers and acquisitions; and the purchase of units in Nortel Networks stock fund or purchase of
Nortel Networks Corporation common shares under our defined contribution and investments plans
until such time as, at the earliest, we are in compliance with U.S. and Canadian regulatory
securities filing requirements. On May 31, 2004, the OSC issued a final order prohibiting all
trading by our directors, officers and certain current and former employees in our securities and
those of Nortel Networks Corporation. This order will remain in effect until two full business
days following the receipt by the OSC of all filings required to be made by us and NNC pursuant to
Ontario securities law. Accordingly, our ability to provide employees with the opportunity to
participate in Nortel Networks stock option plans, restricted stock unit plans and employee
investment and share purchase plans has been adversely affected and certain employees have not been
able to trade in our and NNCs securities. The current suspension of these programs and OSC
trading order, and any future suspension or OSC order, may have a material adverse effect on our
ability to hire, assimilate in a timely manner and retain qualified personnel. In addition, in 2004 we terminated for cause our former president and chief executive officer,
former chief financial officer, former controller and seven additional individuals with significant
responsibilities for financial reporting. In August and September 2004, as part of our new
strategic plan, we announced an anticipated workforce reduction of approximately 3,250 employees.
Approximately 64% of employee actions related to the focused workforce reduction were completed by
the end of 2004, including approximately 55% that were notified of termination or acceptance of
voluntary retirement, with the remainder comprised of voluntary attrition of employees that were
not replaced. The remainder of employee actions are expected to be completed by June 30, 2005. In
addition, in 2001, 2002 and 2003, we implemented a company-wide restructuring plan, which included
a reduction of approximately two-thirds of our workforce over the three-year period. We may find it more difficult to attract or retain qualified employees because of our recent
significant workforce reductions, business performance, management changes, restatement activities
and resulting negative publicity and the resulting impacts on our incentive programs and incentive
compensation plans. If we have not properly sized our workforce and retained those employees with
the appropriate skills, our ability to compete effectively may be adversely affected. We are also
more dependent on those employees we have retained, as many have taken on increased
responsibilities due to workforce reductions. If we are not successful in attracting, recruiting
or retaining qualified employees, including members of senior management, we may not have the
personnel necessary to achieve our business objectives, including the implementation of our
remedial measures. Ongoing SEC review may require us to amend our public disclosures further. We have received comments on our periodic filings from the staff of the SECs Division of
Corporation Finance. As part of this comment process, we may receive further comments from the
staff of the SEC relating to this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q and our other periodic filings. As a result, we may be required by the SEC to amend this Form
10-Q or other reports filed with the SEC in order to make adjustments or additional disclosures.
However, we do not believe that it will be feasible to amend our 2002 Form 10-K/A or 2003 Form
10-Qs due to, among other factors, the identified material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting, the significant turnover in our finance personnel, changes in accounting
systems, documentation weaknesses, a likely inability to obtain third party corroboration in
certain cases due to the substantial industry adjustment in recent years and the passage of time
generally. Amendments to our prior filings would be required for us to be in full compliance with
our Exchange Act reporting obligations. 111




---



##### Table of Contents



Risks relating to our business We continue to restructure our business to respond to industry and market conditions. The
assumptions underlying our restructuring efforts may prove to be inaccurate and we may have to
restructure our business again in the future. We continue to restructure our business to realign resources and achieve desired cost savings in an
increasingly competitive market. Our new strategic plan includes an anticipated further workforce
reduction of approximately 3,250 employees. We have based our restructuring efforts on certain
assumptions regarding the cost structure of our business. Our current assumptions may or may not
be correct and as a result, we may determine that further restructuring in the future will be
needed. Our restructuring efforts may not be sufficient for us to achieve improved results and
meet the changes in industry and market conditions, including increased competition. In
particular, we face increased competition from low cost competitors such as Huawei Technologies
Co., Ltd. and ZTE Corporation. We must manage the potentially higher growth areas of our business,
as well as the non-core areas, in order for us to achieve improved results. We have made, and will continue to make, judgments as to whether we should further reduce our
workforce or exit, or dispose of, certain businesses. These workforce reductions may impair our
ability to achieve our current or future business objectives. Costs incurred in connection with
restructuring efforts may be higher than estimated. Any decision by management to further limit
investment or exit, or dispose of, businesses may result in the recording of additional charges.
As a result, the costs actually incurred in connection with the restructuring efforts may be higher
than originally planned and may not lead to the anticipated cost savings and/or improved results. As part of our review of restructured businesses, we look at the recoverability of their tangible
and intangible assets. Future market conditions may trigger further write downs of these assets
due to uncertainties in:  
    
    the estimates and assumptions used in asset valuations, which are based on our
forecasts of future business performance; and
    
    accounting estimates related to the useful life and recoverability of the net
book value of these assets, including inventory, goodwill, net deferred taxes and other
intangible assets. We will continue to review our restructuring work plan based on our ongoing assessment of the
industry and the business environment. Our operating results have historically been subject to yearly and quarterly fluctuations and are
expected to continue to fluctuate. Our operating results have historically been, and are expected to continue to be, subject to
quarterly and yearly fluctuations as a result of a number of factors. These factors include:  
    
    our ability to execute our strategic plan, including the planned workforce
reductions, without negatively impacting our relationships with our customers, the delivery
of products based on new and developing technologies at competitive prices, the
effectiveness of our internal processes and organizations and the retention of qualified
personnel;
    
    our ability to focus on the day-to-day operation of our business while
implementing improvements in our internal controls and procedures, including our accounting
systems, and addressing the civil litigation actions and investigations related to our
restatements;
    
    our ability to successfully implement programs to stimulate customer spending
by anticipating and offering the kinds of products and services customers will require in
the future to increase the efficiency and profitability of their networks;
    
    our ability to successfully complete programs on a timely basis to reduce our
cost structure, including fixed costs, to streamline our operations and to reduce product costs;
    
    our ability to successfully comply with increased and complex regulations;
    
    our ability to focus our business on what we believe to be potentially higher
growth, higher margin businesses and to dispose of or exit non-core businesses;
    
    increased price and product competition in the networking industry, including
from low cost competitors;
    
    the inherent uncertainties of using forecasts, estimates and assumptions for
asset valuations and in determining the amounts of accrued liabilities, provisions and
other items in our consolidated financial statements;
    
    the impact of changes in global capital markets and interest rates on our pension plan assets and obligations;
    
    fluctuations in our gross margins;
    
    the development, introduction and market acceptance of new technologies, and
integrated networking solutions, as well as the adoption of new networking standards;
    
    the overall trend toward industry consolidation and rationalization among our
customers, competitors and suppliers; 112




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    our ability to make investments, including acquisitions to strengthen our business;
    
    the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing to fund capital expenditures;
    
    variations in sales channels, product costs and the mix of products sold;
    
    the size and timing of customer orders and shipments;
    
    our ability to continue to obtain customer performance bonds and contracts;
    
    our ability to maintain appropriate inventory levels;
    
    the impact of acquired businesses and technologies;
    
    the impact of our product development schedules, product quality variances,
manufacturing capacity and lead times required to produce our products; and
    
    the impact of higher insurance premiums and deductibles and greater
limitations on insurance coverage. Our decision to adopt fair value accounting for employee stock options on a prospective basis as of
January 1, 2003 has caused us to record an expense over the stock option vesting period, based on
the fair value at the date the options are granted, and could have a significant negative effect on
our reported results. Additionally, we are required to perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and between
annual tests in certain circumstances, to value our deferred tax
assets and to partially accrue unfunded
pension liabilities, each of which may result in a negative effect on our reported results. We enter into agreements that may require us to make certain indemnification payments to third
parties in the event of certain changes in an underlying economic characteristic related to assets,
liabilities or equity securities of such third parties. The occurrence of events that may cause us
to become liable to make an indemnification payment is not within our control and an obligation to
make a significant indemnification payment under such agreements could have a significant negative
effect on our reported results. As a consequence, operating results for a particular future period are difficult to predict, and
therefore, prior results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future
periods. Any of the foregoing factors, or any other factors described herein, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition that could
adversely affect the price of our publicly traded securities. Global economic conditions and other trends and factors affecting the telecommunications industry
are beyond our control and may result in reduced demand and pricing pressure on our products. There are trends and factors affecting the industry that are beyond our control and may affect our
operations. These trends and factors include:  
    
    adverse changes in the public and private equity and debt markets and our
ability, as well as the ability of our customers and suppliers, to obtain financing or to
fund working capital and capital expenditures;
    
    adverse changes in the credit quality of our customers and suppliers;
    
    adverse changes in the market conditions in our industry and the specific markets for our products;
    
    the trend towards the sale of converged networking solutions, which could lead
to reduced capital spending on multiple networks by our customers;
    
    visibility to, and the actual size and timing of, capital expenditures by our customers;
    
    inventory practices, including the timing of product and service deployment, of our customers;
    
    the amount of network capacity and the network capacity utilization rates of
our customers, and the amount of sharing and/or acquisition of new and/or existing network
capacity by our customers;
    
    policies of our customers regarding utilization of single or multiple vendors
for the products they purchase;
    
    the overall trend toward industry consolidation and rationalization among our
customers, competitors and suppliers;
    
    conditions in the broader market for communications products, including data
networking products and computerized information access equipment and services;
    
    increased price competition, particularly from low cost competitors;
    
    changes in legislation or accounting rules and governmental and environmental
regulation or intervention affecting communications or data networking;
    
    computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptions from unauthorized
tampering with our computer systems; and
    
    acts of war or terrorism that could lead to disruptions in general global
economic activity, changes in logistics and 113




---



##### Table of Contents



security arrangements and reduced customer
demand for our products and services. Cautious capital spending in our industry has affected, and could affect, demand for, or pricing
pressures on, our products. Our gross margins may decline, which would reduce our operating results and could contribute to
volatility in the market price of our publicly traded securities. Our gross margins may be negatively affected as a result of a number of factors, including:  
    
    increased price competition, particularly from low cost competitors;
    
    changes in product and geographic mix;
    
    customer and contract settlement costs;
    
    higher product, material or labor costs;
    
    increased inventory provisions or contract and customer settlement costs;
    
    warranty costs;
    
    obsolescence charges;
    
    loss of cost savings on future inventory purchases as a result of high inventory levels;
    
    introduction of new products and costs of entering new markets;
    
    increased levels of customer services;
    
    changes in distribution channels;
    
    excess capacity or excess fixed assets;
    
    accruals for employee incentive bonuses;
    
    further restructuring costs; and
    
    costs related to our restatements, including the possibility of substantial
fines, settlements and/or damages or other penalties, and/or remedial actions. Lower than expected gross margins would negatively affect our operating results and could
contribute to volatility in the market price of our publicly traded securities. Cash flow fluctuations may affect our ability to fund our working capital requirements or achieve
our business objectives in a timely manner. Additional sources of funds may not be available or
may not be available on acceptable terms. Our working capital requirements and cash flows historically have been, and are expected to
continue to be, subject to quarterly and yearly fluctuations, depending on such factors as timing
and size of capital expenditures, levels of sales, timing of deliveries and collection of
receivables, inventory levels, customer payment terms, customer financing obligations and supplier
terms and conditions. In addition, if the industry or our current condition deteriorates,
notwithstanding the EDC Support Facility, an increased portion of our cash and cash equivalents may
be restricted as cash collateral for customer performance bonds and contracts. We believe our cash
on hand will be sufficient to fund our current business model, manage our investments and meet our
customer commitments for at least the next 12 months. In making this estimate, we have not made
provision for any material payments in connection with our pending civil litigation actions and
investigations related to the First Restatement and Second Restatement, other than our anticipated
professional fees and expenses. Any material
adverse legal judgments, fines, penalties or settlements arising from these pending civil
litigation actions and investigations could require additional funding which may not be available
on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. This could have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity, which could be very significant. In addition, a greater than expected slow down in capital spending by service providers and other
customers may require us to adjust our current business model. As a result, our revenues and cash
flows may be materially lower than we expect and we may be required to further reduce our capital
expenditures and investments or take other measures in order to meet our cash requirements. We may seek additional funds from liquidity-generating transactions and other sources of external
financing (which may include a variety of debt, convertible debt and/or equity financings). We
cannot provide any assurance that our net cash requirements will be as we currently expect, that we
will continue to have access to the EDC Support Facility when and as needed, or that
liquidity-generating transactions or financings will be available to us on acceptable terms or at
all. Our inability to manage cash flow fluctuations resulting from the above factors and the
potential reduction, expiry or termination 114




---



##### Table of Contents



of the EDC Support Facility could have a material
adverse effect on our ability to fund our working capital requirements from operating cash flows
and other sources of liquidity or to achieve our business objectives in a timely manner. We may be materially and adversely affected by cautious capital spending by our customers. The
loss of customers in certain markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition. We expect that our consolidated revenues in 2004 will be slightly lower compared to 2003. The 2003
consolidated revenues included revenues that were deferred from prior periods. Continued
cautiousness in capital spending by service providers and other customers may affect our revenues
more than we currently expect. Our revenues and operating results have been and may continue to be
materially and adversely affected by the continued cautiousness in capital spending by our
customers. We have focused on the larger customers in certain markets, which provide a substantial
portion of our revenues. A reduction or delay in business from one or more of these customers, or
a failure to achieve a significant market share with these customers, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our business may be materially and adversely affected by our high level of debt. In order to finance our business, we have incurred significant levels of debt compared to
historical levels, and we may need to secure additional sources of funding, which may include debt
or convertible debt financing, in the future. A high level of debt, arduous or restrictive terms
and conditions related to accessing certain sources of funding, failure to meet the covenants in
the EDC Support Facility and any significant reduction in, or access to, such facility, poor
business performance or lower than expected cash inflows could materially and adversely affect our
ability to fund the operation of our business. Other effects of a high level of debt include the following:  
    
    we may have difficulty borrowing money in the future or accessing other
sources of funding;
    
    we may need to use a large portion of our cash flow from operations to pay
principal and interest on our indebtedness, which would reduce the amount of cash available
to finance our operations and other business activities;
    
    a high debt level, arduous or restrictive terms and conditions, or lower than
expected cash flows would make us more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse
developments in our business; and
    
    if operating cash flows are not sufficient to meet our operating expenses,
capital expenditures and debt service requirements as they become due, we may be required,
in order to meet our debt service obligations, to delay or reduce capital expenditures or
the introduction of new products, sell assets and/or forego business opportunities
including acquisitions, research and development projects or product design enhancements. An increased portion of our cash and cash equivalents may be restricted as cash collateral if we
are unable to secure alternative support for certain obligations arising out of our normal course
business activities. The EDC Support Facility may not provide all the support we require for certain of our obligations
arising out of our normal course of business activities. In particular, although this facility
provides for up to $750 in support, the $300 revolving small bond sub-facility will not become
committed support until all of the Reports are filed and we obtain a permanent waiver of the
Related Breaches. As of January 21, 2005, there was
approximately $292 of outstanding support
utilized under the EDC Support Facility, approximately $208 of which was outstanding under the small
bond sub-facility. In addition, bid and
performance related bonds with terms that extend beyond December 31, 2006, which, absent any early
termination of the EDC Support Facility, is the expiry date of this facility, are currently not
eligible for the support provided by the EDC Support Facility. Given that the EDC Support Facility
is used to support bid and performance bonds with varying terms, including those with at least 365
days, we may need to increase our use of cash collateral to support these obligations beginning on
January 1, 2006 absent a further extension of the facility. Unless EDC agrees to extend the
facility or agrees to provide support outside the scope of the facility, we may be required to
provide cash collateral to support these obligations. We cannot provide any assurance that we will
reach an agreement with EDC on these matters. Under the terms of the waiver letter with EDC dated
March 29, 2004, EDC may also suspend its obligation to issue us any additional support if events
occur that have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of
operations. If we do not have access to sufficient support under the EDC Support Facility, and if
we are unable to secure alternative support, an increased portion of our cash and cash equivalents
may be restricted as cash collateral, which could adversely affect our ability to fund some of our
normal course business activities, capital expenditures, R&D and our ability to borrow in the
future. 115




---



##### Table of Contents



An inability of our subsidiaries to provide us with funding in sufficient amounts could adversely
affect our ability to meet our obligations. We may at times depend primarily on loans, dividends or other forms of financing from our
subsidiaries to meet our obligations to pay interest and principal on outstanding public debt and
to pay corporate expenses. If our subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends or provide us with
loans or other forms of financing in sufficient amounts, it could adversely affect our ability to
meet our obligations. We may need to make larger contributions to our defined benefit plans in the future. We currently maintain various defined benefit plans in North America and the U.K. which cover
various categories of employees and retirees, which represent our major retirement plans. In
addition, we have smaller retirement plans in other countries. Our obligations to make
contributions to fund benefit obligations under these plans are based on actuarial valuations,
which themselves are based on certain assumptions about the long-term operation of the plans,
including employee turnover and retirement rates, the performance of the financial markets and
interest rates. If experience differs from the assumptions, the amounts we are obligated to
contribute to the plans may increase. In particular, the performance of the financial markets is
difficult to predict, particularly in periods of high volatility in the equity markets. If the
financial markets perform lower than the assumptions, we may have to make larger contributions in
the future than we would otherwise have to make and expenses related to defined benefit plans could
increase. Similarly, changes in interest rates can impact our contribution requirements. In a low
interest rate environment, the likelihood of required contributions in the future increases. If
interest rates are lower in the future than we assume they will be, then we would probably be
required to make larger contributions than we would otherwise have to make. In addition, the 2004 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Monsanto Canada Inc. v.
Superintendent of Financial Services has caused companies in Canada that sponsor defined benefit
plans, including us, to review certain of our past activities that may have triggered partial
wind-ups of such plans to determine whether a distribution of plan surplus, if any, should have
occurred at the time of any triggering event. Although the full impact of the decision remains
unclear and we have not yet made any determination regarding our plans, if it is determined that a
distribution of plan surplus should have occurred at the time of any triggering event, we may be
required to make a distribution out of our plan assets, which may lead to an increase in the amount
of future contributions that we are required to make. If market conditions deteriorate or future results of operations are less than expected, an
additional valuation allowance may be required for all or a portion of our deferred tax assets. We currently have deferred tax assets, which may be used to reduce taxable income in the future.
We assess the realization of these deferred tax assets quarterly, and if we determine that it is
more likely than not that some portion of these assets will not be realized, an income tax
valuation allowance is recorded. Our valuation allowance is primarily attributable to continued
uncertainty in the industry. If market conditions deteriorate or future results of operations are
less than expected, future assessments may result in a determination that it is more likely than
not that some or all of our net deferred tax assets are not realizable. As a result, we may need
to establish an additional valuation allowance for all or a portion of our net deferred tax assets,
which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Our performance may be materially and adversely affected if our expectations regarding market
demand for particular products prove to be wrong. We expect that data communications traffic will grow at a faster rate than the growth expected for
voice traffic and that the use of the Internet will continue to increase. We expect the growth of
data traffic and the use of the Internet will significantly impact traditional voice networks, both
wireline and wireless. We believe that this will create market discontinuities, which will make
traditional voice network products and services less effective as they were not designed for data
traffic. We believe that these market discontinuities in turn will lead to the convergence of data
and voice through upgrades of traditional voice networks to transport large volumes of data traffic
or through the construction of new networks designed to transport both voice and data traffic.
Either approach would require significant capital expenditures by service providers. We also
believe that such developments will give rise to the demand for IP optimized networking solutions,
and third generation, or 3G, wireless networks. We cannot be sure what the rate of this convergence of voice and data networks will be, due to the
dynamic and rapidly evolving nature of the communications business, the technology involved and the
availability of capital. Consequently, market discontinuities and the resulting demand for
IP-optimized networking solutions or 3G wireless networks may not 116




---



##### Table of Contents



continue. Alternatively, the
pace of that development may be slower than currently anticipated. The market may also develop in
an unforeseen direction. Certain events, including the commercial availability and actual
implementation of new technologies, including 3G networks, or the evolution of other technologies,
may occur, which would affect the extent or timing of anticipated market demand, or increase demand
for products based on other technologies, or reduce the demand for IP-optimized networking
solutions or 3G wireless networks. Any such change in demand may reduce purchases of our
networking solutions by our customers, require increased expenditures to develop and market
different technologies, or provide market opportunities for our competitors. Our performance may
also be materially and adversely affected by a lack of growth in the rate of data traffic, a
reduction in the use of the Internet or a reduction in the demand for IP-optimized networking
solutions or 3G wireless networks in the future. We have made, and may continue to make, strategic acquisitions. If we are not successful in
operating or integrating these acquisitions, our business, results of operations and financial
condition may be materially and adversely affected. In the past, we acquired companies that we believed would enhance the expansion of our business and
products. We may make selective opportunistic acquisitions of companies or businesses with
resources and product or service offerings capable of providing us with additional product and/or
market strengths. Acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including:  
    
    the industry may develop in a different direction than anticipated and the
technologies we acquire may not prove to be those we need;
    
    the future valuations of acquired businesses may decrease from the market
price we paid for these acquisitions;
    
    the revenues of acquired businesses may not offset increased operating
expenses associated with these acquisitions;
    
    potential difficulties in completing in-process research and development
projects and delivering high quality products to our customers;
    
    potential difficulties in integrating new products, software, businesses and
operations in an efficient and effective manner;
    
    our customers or customers of the acquired businesses may defer purchase
decisions as they evaluate the impact of the acquisitions on our future product strategy;
    
    potential loss of key employees of the acquired businesses;
    
    diversion of the attention of our senior management from the operation of our daily business;
    
    entering new markets in which we have limited experience and where competitors
may have a stronger market presence; and
    
    potential assumption of liabilities. Our inability to successfully operate and integrate newly acquired businesses appropriately,
effectively and in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on our ability to take
advantage of further growth in demand for IP-optimized network solutions and other advances in
technology, as well as on our revenues, gross margins and expenses. Acquisitions are inherently risky, and no assurance can be given that our previous or future
acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating
results, or financial condition. Failure to manage and successfully integrate acquisitions could
materially harm our business and operating results. We operate in highly dynamic and volatile industries characterized by rapidly changing
technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and short product
life cycles. The markets for our products are characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry
standards, frequent new product introductions and short product life cycles. Our success depends,
in substantial part, on the timely and successful introduction of high quality new products and
upgrades, as well as cost reductions on current products to address the operational speed,
bandwidth, efficiency and cost requirements of our customers. Our success will also depend on our
ability to comply with emerging industry standards, to operate with products of other suppliers, to
integrate, simplify and reduce the number of software programs used in our portfolio of products,
to address emerging market trends, to provide our customers with new revenue-generating
opportunities and to compete with technological and product developments carried out by others.
The development of new, technologically advanced products, including IP-optimized networking
solutions, software products and 3G wireless networks, is a complex and uncertain process requiring
high levels of innovation, as well as the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends.
Investments in this development may result in our expenses growing at a faster rate than our
revenues, particularly since the initial investment to bring a product to market may be high. 117




---



##### Table of Contents



We may not be successful in targeting new market opportunities, in developing and commercializing new
products in a timely manner or in achieving market acceptance for our new products. The success of new or enhanced products, including IP-optimized networking solutions and 3G
wireless networks, depends on a number of other factors, including the timely introduction of those
products, market acceptance of new technologies and industry standards, the quality and robustness
of new or enhanced products, competing product offerings, the pricing and marketing of those
products and the availability of funding for those networks. Products and technologies developed
by our competitors may render our products obsolete. Hackers may attempt to disrupt or exploit our
customers use of our technologies. If we fail to respond in a timely and effective manner to
unanticipated changes in one or more of the technologies affecting telecommunications and data
networking or our new products or product enhancements fail to achieve market acceptance, our
ability to compete effectively in our industry, and our sales, market share and customer
relationships could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, unanticipated changes in market demand for products based on a specific technology,
particularly lower than anticipated, or delays in, demand for IP-optimized networking solutions,
particularly long-haul and metro optical networking solutions, or 3G wireless networks, could have
a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition if we fail
to respond to those changes in a timely and effective manner. We face significant competition and may not be able to maintain our market share and may suffer
from competitive pricing practices. We operate in a highly volatile industry that is characterized by industry rationalization and
consolidation, vigorous competition for market share and rapid technological development.
Competition is heightened in periods of slow overall market growth. These factors could result in
aggressive pricing practices and growing competition from smaller niche companies, established
competitors, as well as well-capitalized computer systems and communications companies, which, in
turn, could have a material adverse effect on our gross margins. Since some of the markets in which we compete are characterized by the potential for rapid growth
and, in certain cases, low barriers to entry and rapid technological changes, smaller, specialized
companies and start-up ventures are now, or may in the future become, principal competitors. We
may also face competition from the resale of used telecommunications equipment, including our own
on occasion, by failed, downsized or consolidated high technology enterprises and
telecommunications service providers. In addition, we face the risk that certain of our
competitors may enter into additional business combinations, accelerate product development, or
engage in aggressive price reductions or other competitive practices, which make them more powerful
or aggressive competitors. We expect that we will face additional competition from existing competitors and from a number of
companies that have entered or may enter our existing and future markets. In particular, we
currently, and may in the future, face increased competition from low cost competitors such as
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. and ZTE Corporation. Some of our current and potential competitors
have greater marketing, technical and financial resources, including access to capital markets
and/or the ability to provide customer financing in connection with the sale of products. Many of
our current and potential competitors have also established, or may in the future establish,
relationships with our current and potential customers. Other competitive factors include the
ability to provide new technologies and products, end-to-end networking solutions, and new product
features, such as security, as well as conformance to industry standards. Increased competition
could result in price reductions, negatively affecting our operating results, reducing profit
margins and could potentially lead to a loss of
market share. For a list of our principal competitors, see Competition in each of the business segment
descriptions in the Business section of this report. We face certain barriers in our efforts to expand internationally. We intend to continue to pursue international and emerging market growth opportunities. In many
international markets, long-standing relationships between potential customers and their local
suppliers and protective regulations, including local content requirements and type approvals,
create barriers to entry. In addition, pursuing international opportunities may require
significant investments for an extended period before returns on such investments, if any, are
realized and such investments may result in expenses growing at a faster rate than revenues.
Furthermore, those projects and investments could be adversely affected by: 118




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    reversals or delays in the opening of foreign markets to new competitors;
    
    trade protection measures;
    
    exchange controls;
    
    currency fluctuations;
    
    investment policies;
    
    restrictions on repatriation of cash;
    
    nationalization of local industry;
    
    economic, social and political risks;
    
    taxation;
    
    interest rates;
    
    challenges in staffing and managing international opportunities;
    
    other factors, depending on the country involved; and
    
    acts of war or terrorism. Difficulties in foreign financial markets and economies and of foreign financial institutions,
particularly in emerging markets, could adversely affect demand from customers in the affected
countries. An inability to maintain or expand our business in international and emerging markets
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could negatively impact our business, results of
operations and financial condition. As an increasing proportion of our business may be denominated in currencies other than U.S.
dollars, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may have an adverse impact on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. Our primary currency exposures are to
Canadian dollars, British pounds and the euro. These exposures may change over time as we change
the geographic mix of our global business and as our business practices evolve. For instance, if
we increase our presence in emerging markets, we may see an increase in our exposure to emerging
market currencies, such as, for example, the Indian rupee. These currencies may be affected by
internal factors and external developments in other countries. Also, our ability to enter into
normal course derivative or hedging transactions in the future may be impacted by our current
credit condition. We cannot predict whether foreign exchange losses will be incurred in the
future, and significant foreign exchange rate fluctuations may have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition. If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, or if we are subject to adverse judgments
or settlements arising out of disputes regarding intellectual property rights, our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. Our industry is subject to uncertainty over adoption of industry standards and protection of
intellectual property rights. Our success is dependent on our proprietary technology, for the
protection of which we rely on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws. Our business is
global and the level of protection of our proprietary technology provided by those laws varies by
jurisdiction. Our issued patents may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, and our rights
under issued patents may not provide us with competitive advantages. Patents may not be issued
from pending applications, and claims in patents issued in the future may not be sufficiently broad
to protect our proprietary technology. In addition, claims of
intellectual property infringement or trade secret misappropriation may be asserted against us or
our customers in connection with their use of our products and the outcome of any of those claims
may be uncertain. An unfavorable outcome in such a claim could require us to cease offering for
sale the products that are the subject of such a claim, pay substantial monetary damages to a third
party and/or make ongoing royalty payments to a third party. In addition, any defense of claims of
intellectual property infringement or trade secret misappropriation may require extensive
participation by senior management and/or other key employees and may reduce their time and ability
to focus on other aspects of our business. A failure by us to react to changing industry
standards, the lack of broadly-accepted industry standards, successful claims of intellectual
property infringement or other intellectual property claims against us or our customers, or a
failure by us to protect our proprietary technology could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if others infringe on our
intellectual property rights, we may not be able to successfully contest such challenges. Rationalization and consolidation in the industry may lead to increased competition and harm our
business. The industry has experienced consolidation and rationalization and we expect this trend to
continue. There have been 119




---



##### Table of Contents



adverse changes in the public and private equity and debt markets for
industry participants which have affected their ability to obtain financing or to fund capital
expenditures. Some operators have experienced financial difficulty and have, or may, file for
bankruptcy protection or be acquired by other operators. Other operators may merge and we and one
or more of our competitors may each supply products to the companies that have merged or will
merge. This rationalization and/or consolidation could result in our dependence on a smaller
number of customers, purchasing decision delays by the merged companies and/or our playing a lesser
role, or no longer playing a role, in the supply of communications products to the merged
companies. This rationalization and/or consolidation, including the acquisition by Cingular
Wireless of AT&T Wireless, could also cause increased competition among our customers and pressure
on the pricing of their products and services, which could cause further financial difficulties for
our customers. A rationalization of industry participants could also increase the supply of used
communications products for resale, resulting in increased competition and pressure on the pricing
for our new products. In addition, telecommunications equipment suppliers may enter into business
combinations, or may be acquired by or sell a substantial portion of their assets to other
competitors, resulting in accelerated product development, increased financial strength, or a
broader base of customers, creating even more powerful or aggressive competitors. We may also see
rationalization among equipment/component suppliers. The business failures of operators,
competitors or suppliers may cause uncertainty among investors and in the industry generally and
harm our business. Changes in regulation of the Internet and/or other aspects of the industry may affect the manner in
which we conduct our business and may materially and adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition. Investment decisions of our customers could be affected by regulation of the Internet or other
aspects of the industry in any country where we operate. We could also be materially and adversely
affected by an increase in competition among equipment suppliers or by reduced capital spending by
our customers, as a result of a change in the regulation of the industry. If a jurisdiction in
which we operate adopts measures which affect the regulation of the Internet and/or other aspects
of the industry, we could experience both decreased demand for our products and increased costs of
selling such products. Changes in laws or regulations governing the Internet, Internet commerce
and/or other aspects of the industry could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition. In the U.S., on February 20, 2003, the FCC announced a decision in its triennial review proceeding
of the agencys rules regarding UNEs. The text of the FCCs order and reasons for the decision
were released on August 21, 2003. The uncertainty surrounding the impact of the FCC decision and
subsequent adoption on December 15, 2004 of new unbundling rules in response to the remand by the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is affecting, and may continue to affect, the decisions
of certain of our U.S.-based service provider customers regarding investment in their
telecommunications infrastructure. These UNE rules and/or material changes in other
country-specific telecommunications or other regulations may affect capital spending by certain of
our service provider customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition. In Europe, we expect to become subject to new product content laws and product takeback and
recycling requirements that will require full compliance by 2006. We expect that these laws will
require us to incur additional compliance costs. Although compliance costs relating to
environmental matters have not resulted in a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition in the past, they may result in a material adverse effect in the
future. Industry concerns could continue and increase our exposure to our customers credit risk and the
risk that our customers will not be able to fulfill their payment obligations to us under customer
financing arrangements. The competitive environment in which we operate has required us in the past to provide significant
amounts of medium-term and long-term customer financing. Customer financing arrangements may
include financing in connection with the sale of our products and services, funding for certain
non-product and service costs associated with network installation and integration of our products
and services, financing for working capital and equity financing. While we have significantly
reduced our customer financing exposure, we expect we may continue in the future to provide
customer financing to customers in areas that are strategic to our core business activity. We expect to continue to hold most current and future customer financing obligations for longer
periods prior to any possible placement with third-party lenders, due to, among other factors,
recent economic uncertainty in various countries, adverse capital market conditions, our current
credit condition, adverse changes in the credit quality of our customers and reduced demand for
telecommunications financing in capital and bank markets. In addition, risks generally associated
with customer financing, including the risks associated with new technologies, new network
construction, market demand and competition, customer business plan viability and funding risks,
may require us to hold certain customer financing obligations over a longer term. We may not be
able to place any of our current or future customer financing obligations with third-party lenders 120




---



##### Table of Contents



on acceptable terms. Certain customers have been experiencing financial difficulties and have failed to meet their
financial obligations. As a result, we have incurred charges for increased provisions related to
certain trade and customer financing receivables. If there are further increases in the failure of
our customers to meet their customer financing and receivables obligations to us or if the
assumptions underlying the amount of provisions we have taken with respect to customer financing
and receivables obligations do not reflect actual future financial conditions and customer payment
levels, we could incur losses in excess of our provisions, which could have a material adverse
effect on our cash flow and operating results. Negative developments associated with our supply contracts and contract manufacturing agreements
may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and
supply relationships. We have entered into supply contracts with customers to provide products and services, which in
some cases involve new technologies currently being developed, or which we have not yet
commercially deployed, or which require us to build networks. Some of these supply contracts
contain delivery and installation timetables, performance criteria and other contractual
obligations which, if not met, could result in our having to pay substantial penalties or
liquidated damages and/or the termination of the supply contract. Unexpected developments in these
supply contracts could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, cash flows and relationships
with our customers. Our ability to meet customer demand is, in part, dependent on us obtaining timely and adequate
component parts and products from suppliers, contract manufacturers, and internal manufacturing
capacity. As part of the transformation of our supply chain from a vertically integrated
manufacturing model to a virtually integrated model, we have outsourced substantially all of our
manufacturing capacity to contract manufacturers, including an agreement with Flextronics announced
on June 29, 2004 regarding the divestiture of certain of our manufacturing operations and related
activities. The transfer to Flextronics of our optical design operations and related assets in
Ottawa, Canada and Monkstown, Northern Ireland was completed in the fourth quarter of 2004. The
transfer of our manufacturing activities in Montreal, Canada is expected to be completed in the
first quarter of 2005. The balance of the divestiture is anticipated to close in the first half of
2005, subject to completion of the required information and consultation processes with the
relevant employee representatives. Upon the completion of the divestiture, a significant portion
of our supply chain will be concentrated with Flextronics. We work closely with our suppliers and
contract manufacturers to address quality issues and to meet increases in customer demand, when
needed, and we also manage our internal manufacturing capacity, quality, and inventory levels as
required. However, we may encounter shortages of quality components and/or products in the future.
In addition, our component suppliers and contract manufacturers have experienced, and may continue
to experience, a consolidation in the industry and financial difficulties, both of which may result
in fewer sources of components or products and greater exposure to the financial stability of our
suppliers. A reduction or interruption in component supply or external manufacturing capacity, a
significant increase in the price of one or more components, or excessive inventory levels could
materially and negatively affect our gross margins and our operating results and could materially
damage customer relationships. Many of our current and planned products are highly complex and may contain defects or errors that
are detected only after deployment in telecommunications networks, which could harm our reputation. Our products are highly complex, and some of them can be fully tested only when deployed in
telecommunications networks or with other equipment. From time to time, our products have
contained undetected defects, errors or failures. The occurrence of any defects, errors or
failures could result in cancellation of orders, product returns, diversion of our resources,
legal actions by our customers or our customers end users and other losses to us or to our
customers or end users. Any of these occurrences could also result in the loss of or delay in
market acceptance of our products and loss of sales, which would harm our business and adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our business may suffer if our strategic alliances are not successful. We have entered into a number of strategic alliances with suppliers, developers and members in our
industry to facilitate product compatibility, encourage adoption of industry standards or to offer
complementary product or service offerings to meet customer needs. In some cases, the companies
with which we have strategic alliances also compete against us in some of our business areas. If a
member of a strategic alliance fails to perform its obligations, if the relationship fails to
develop as expected or if the relationship is terminated, we could experience delays in product
availability or impairment of our relationships with our customers. 121




---



##### Table of Contents



In addition to the investigations and litigation arising out of our restatements, we are also
subject to numerous class actions and other lawsuits as well as lawsuits in the ordinary course of
business. In addition to the investigations and litigation arising out of our restatements, we are currently
a defendant in numerous class actions and other lawsuits, including lawsuits initiated on behalf of
holders of Nortel Networks Corporation common shares, which seek damages of material and
indeterminate amounts, as well as lawsuits in the ordinary course of our business. In the future,
we may be subject to similar litigation. The defense of these lawsuits may divert our managements
attention, and we may incur significant expenses in defending these lawsuits (including substantial
fees of lawyers and other professional advisors and potential obligations to indemnify officers and
directors who may be parties to such actions). In addition, we may be required to pay judgments or
settlements that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and liquidity. 122




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 3.
    
    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact the consolidated financial statements
of Nortel Networks due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates. Nortel Networks
market risk exposure is primarily a result of fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange
rates. Disclosure of market risk is contained in Market Risk in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003. 
  ITEM 4.
    
    Controls and Procedures In light of the relevance of the findings of the Independent Review to the matters addressed
in this Item 4, please see the Summary of Findings and of Recommended Remedial Measures of the
Independent Review, submitted to the Audit Committee by WCPHD and Huron Consulting Services LLC,
or the Independent Review Summary, included in Item 9A of our 2003 Annual Report. This Item 4
addresses, among other matters:  
    
    current managements conclusions concerning our disclosure controls and procedures as at
June 30, 2004 and January 31, 2005 and certain earlier dates (see Current Management
Conclusions Concerning Disclosure Controls and Procedures);
    
    information relating to the First Restatement, including a discussion of material
weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting identified at the time of the First
Restatement (see Additional Background  First Restatement);
    
    information relating to the Second Restatement, including a discussion of material
weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting identified over the course of the
Second Restatement (see Additional Background  Second Restatement);
    
    the determination of the Audit Committee to review the facts and circumstances leading
to the restatement of revenues, as part of the Second Restatement, for specific
transactions during the periods 1999 through 2002, with particular emphasis on the
underlying conduct that led to the initial recognition of these revenues, which we refer to
as the Revenue Independent Review (see Revenue Independent Review);
    
    the current status of our internal control over financial reporting and expectations as
to management conclusions and the independent auditor attestation required to be included
in our fiscal year 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, or the 2004 Form 10-K, pursuant to
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (see Current Status of Material Weaknesses in
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Expectations as to Required Management
Conclusions and Independent Auditor Attestation Pursuant to Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act);
    
    remedial measures adopted by the Board of Directors pursuant to the recommendations of
WCPHD, and remedial measures identified, developed and begun to be implemented by our
current management, including pursuant to recommendations from D&T (see Remedial
Measures); and
    
    changes in internal control over financial reporting (see Remedial Measures).  Current Management Conclusions Concerning Disclosure Controls and Procedures In January 2005, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including the current CEO and current CFO (William A.
Owens and William R. Kerr, respectively), pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange
Act, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as at June 30, 2004 (the end of
the period covered by this report) and as at January 31, 2005. The CEO and CFO were appointed to
such positions as at April 28, 2004, with the CFO having served in such capacity on an interim
basis since March 15, 2004. In making this evaluation, the CEO and CFO considered, among other matters :  
    
    the Second Restatement and the revisions to our preliminary unaudited results for
the year ended December 31, 2003;
    
    the findings of the Independent Review summarized in the Independent Review Summary; 123




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    the terminations for cause of our former president and chief executive officer, former
chief financial officer, former controller and seven additional senior finance employees
during the course of the Independent Review and the reasons therefor as described in the
Independent Review Summary;
    
    the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we and our
external auditor, D&T, have identified (as more fully described below);
    
    the measures we have identified, developed and begun to implement beginning in November
2003 to remedy those material weaknesses (as more fully described below);
    
    our omission of 1999 and 2000 selected financial data from our 2003 Annual Report, and
our decision not to amend our 2002 Form 10-K/A and our 2003 quarterly reports (as more
fully described below); and
    
    the decision of the Audit Committee to undertake the Revenue Independent Review (as more
fully described below). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures, as at June 30, 2004 and January 31, 2005, were not effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. In light of this conclusion and as part of the extensive work undertaken in connection with the
Second Restatement, we have applied compensating procedures and processes as necessary to ensure
the reliability of our financial reporting. Accordingly, management believes, based on its
knowledge, that (i) this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report and (ii) the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as at, and for,
the periods presented in this report. As discussed in our 2003 Annual Report, the Second Restatement and other matters listed above also
resulted in the re-evaluation, in January 2005, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as at December 31, 2002, March 31, 2003, June 30, 2003 and September 30, 2003. Based on
these evaluations and in consideration of the Second Restatement and other matters listed above,
the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as at December 31, 2002,
March 31, 2003, June 30, 2003 and September 30, 2003, were not effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. These new conclusions are in contrast to conclusions reached as a result of previous evaluations
carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the former
chief executive officer and former chief financial officer. In particular, these conclusions
differ from the conclusions stated in our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003 that our disclosure controls and
procedures were so effective as at December 31, 2002, March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003,
respectively. They also differ from the conclusions based upon the re-evaluations carried out in
December 2003 under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the former
president and chief executive officer and former chief financial officer, as stated in our amended
2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, or the 2002 Form 10-K/A, and amended Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003, or the 2003 Form 10-Q/As, that our
disclosure controls and procedures were so effective as at December 31, 2002, March 31, 2003 and
June 30, 2003, respectively, after taking into account the First Restatement and the identification
of certain material weaknesses. These new conclusions also differ from the conclusions stated in
our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 that our disclosure
controls and procedures were so effective as at September 30, 2003, after taking into account the
First Restatement and the identification of certain material weaknesses. * * * * * *  Additional Background This section provides additional information with respect to the identified material weaknesses and
other deficiencies, as well as certain additional background information regarding the First
Restatement and the Second Restatement. 124




---



##### Table of Contents



In this report, unless otherwise indicated, the terms material weakness and reportable
condition have the meanings as formerly set forth under standards established by the AICPA, which
were applicable with respect to 2003. The AICPA then defined a (i) reportable condition as a
matter that comes to an auditors attention that represents a significant deficiency in the design
or operation of internal control that could adversely affect an entitys ability to initiate,
record, process and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the
financial statements and (ii) material weakness as a reportable condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in
relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.  First Restatement  Overview In May 2003, we commenced certain balance sheet reviews at the direction of certain members of
former management that led to the Comprehensive Review, which resulted in the First Restatement.
Each of the former members of management terminated for cause had responsibility for their
respective positions at the time of the Comprehensive Review and First Restatement. As disclosed
in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, the Comprehensive Review
was initiated [I]n light of a period of unprecedented industry adjustment and subsequent
restructuring actions, including workforce reductions and asset write-downs . . . . The amounts
under review were recorded when our balance sheet and income statement were much larger.
Specifically, what would have been relatively minor amounts in prior periods may be considered to
be material to current periods. As noted in the Independent Review Summary, Nortel posted
significant losses in 2001 and 2002 and downsized its work force by nearly two-thirds. The
remaining employees were asked to undertake significant additional responsibilities with no
additional increase in pay and no bonuses. The Companys former senior corporate management
asserted, at the start of the inquiry, that the Companys downturn, and concomitant downsizing of
operations and workforce, led to a loss of documentation and a decline in financial discipline.
Those factors, in their view, were primarily responsible for the significant excess provisions on
the balance sheet as at June 30, 2003, which resulted in the First Restatement. While that
downturn surely played a part in the circumstances leading to the First Restatement, the root
causes ran far deeper. The root causes of the First Restatement, as identified in the Independent
Review, are more fully discussed in the Independent Review Summary. The Comprehensive Review purported to (i) identify balance sheet accounts that, as at June 30,
2003, were not supportable and required adjustment; (ii) determine whether such adjustments related
to the third quarter of 2003 or prior periods; and (iii) document certain account balances in
accordance with our accounting policies and procedures. The Comprehensive Review, as supplemented
by additional procedures carried out between July 2003 and November 2003 to quantify the effects of
potential adjustments in the relevant periods and review the appropriateness of releases of certain
contractual liability and other related provisions (also called accruals, reserves or accrued
liabilities) in the six fiscal quarters ending with the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003, formed
the basis for the adjustments made to the financial statements in the First Restatement. On December 23, 2003, we filed with the SEC the 2002 Form 10-K/A and the 2003 Form 10-Q/As
reflecting the First Restatement. As disclosed in those reports, the net effect of the First
Restatement adjustments was a reduction in accumulated deficit of
$486 million, $171 million and
$32 million as at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The following were the principal
adjustments of the First Restatement:  
    
    Approximately $924 million and $507 million of certain liabilities (primarily accruals
and provisions) carried on our previously reported consolidated balance sheet as at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, were released to income in prior periods.
    
    We determined to correct certain known errors previously not recorded because the amount
of the errors was not material to the consolidated financial statements. Specifically,
among other items, we made certain revenue adjustments to reflect revenue that should have
been deferred instead of recognized in a particular period.
    
    We made adjustments to correct errors related to deferred income tax assets and foreign
currency translation accounts and made reclassification adjustments within the consolidated
balance sheet to better reflect the underlying nature of certain items. These
reclassifications did not impact our net assets as at the end of any period. 125




---



##### Table of Contents



Material Weaknesses and Other Deficiencies in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Identified at the Time of the First Restatement In 2003, we, together with D&T, identified a number of deficiencies in our internal control over
financial reporting. On July 24, 2003, D&T first informed the Audit Committee that deficiencies in documentary support
for certain accruals and provisions on our balance sheet as at June 30, 2003 constituted a
reportable condition, but not a material weakness, in our internal control over financial
reporting. In particular, D&T concluded, in respect of this reportable condition, that it was
unclear, due to the lack of documentation regarding support for certain provisions and accruals,
the passage of time and the turnover of personnel, as to what adjustments, if any, should have been
made in prior years. D&T noted that its assessment was based on such information as was available
at the date of its communication to the Audit Committee and the materiality of the underlying
amounts in the context of 2003 reported results. This conclusion was initially disclosed in our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. On November 18, 2003, as part of the communications by D&T to the Audit Committee with respect to
D&Ts interim audit procedures for the year ended December 31, 2003, D&T informed the Audit
Committee that there were two reportable conditions, each of which constituted a material weakness
in our internal control over financial reporting. No other reportable conditions were communicated
by D&T to the Audit Committee at the time of the First Restatement. These reportable conditions
were as follows:  
    
    lack of compliance with established Nortel Networks procedures for monitoring and
adjusting balances related to certain accruals and provisions, including restructuring
charges; and
    
    lack of compliance with established Nortel Networks procedures for appropriately
applying U.S. GAAP to the initial recording of certain liabilities, including those
described in SFAS No. 5, and to foreign currency translation as described in SFAS No. 52. The foregoing material weaknesses contributed to the need for the First Restatement. Upon
completion of our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as at December 31,
2004 pursuant to Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules, or SOX
404, we currently expect to conclude that these material weaknesses continued to exist as at
December 31, 2004, and we continue to identify, develop and begin to implement remedial measures to
address them, as described below.  Second Restatement  Independent Review In late October 2003, the Audit Committee initiated the Independent Review in order to, as noted in
the Independent Review Summary, gain a full understanding of the events that caused significant
excess liabilities to be maintained on the balance sheet that needed to be restated, and to
recommend that the Board of Directors adopt, and direct management to implement, necessary remedial
measures to address personnel, controls, compliance and discipline. As noted in the Independent
Review Summary, [t]he [Independent Review] focused initially on events relating to the
establishment and release of contractual liability and other related provisions . . . in the second
half of 2002 and the first half of 2003, including the involvement of
senior corporate leadership.  . . .  As the [Independent Review] evolved, its focus broadened to include specific provisioning
activities in each of the business units and geographic regions. In light of concerns raised in
the initial phase of the [Independent Review], the Audit Committee expanded the review to include
provisioning activities in the third and fourth quarters of 2003. As discussed more fully in the Independent Review Summary, the Independent Review concluded that
[i]n summary, former corporate management (now terminated for cause) and former finance management
(now terminated for cause) in the Companys finance organization endorsed, and employees carried
out, accounting practices relating to the recording and release of provisions that were not in
compliance with [U.S. GAAP] in at least four quarters, including the third and fourth quarters of
2002 and the first and second quarters of 2003. In three of those four quarters  when Nortel was
at, or close to, break even  these practices were undertaken to meet internally imposed pro-forma
earnings before taxes . . . targets. While the dollar value of most of the individual provisions
was relatively small, the aggregate value of the provisions made the difference between a profit
and a reported loss, on a pro forma basis, in the fourth quarter of 2002 and the difference between
a loss and a reported profit, on a pro forma basis, in the first and second quarters of 2003. 126




---



##### Table of Contents



Second Restatement Process As noted in the Independent Review Summary, [a]s the [Independent Review] progressed, the Audit
Committee directed new corporate management to examine in-depth the concerns identified by WCPHD
regarding provisioning activity and to review provision releases in each of the four quarters of
2003, down to a low threshold. That examination, and other errors identified by management, led to
[the Second Restatement]. . . . In addition to this examination of provisioning activity, management, including our new CFO,
undertook various initiatives aimed at ensuring the reliability and integrity of the audited
consolidated financial statements included in our 2003 Annual Report
and our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this
report and our other 2004 Form 10-Qs. As part of these efforts, our new CFO
encouraged employees across our finance organization to raise any questions or concerns regarding
other potential accounting errors that should be reviewed for possible adjustment in the Second
Restatement. In addition, as management identified individual customer contracts and transactions
for re-examination of the establishment and release of provisions, management also undertook a
review of many of those contracts and transactions more generally to understand the broader nature
of the original accounting for the contract or transaction. This individual contract and
transaction review also identified additional accounting issues. As a result of these initiatives,
management, with the assistance of outside consultants, then undertook further detailed reviews of
our significant accounting policies, specific transactions and communications and other documents
relating to the identified issues. As a result, the Second Restatement included adjustments to
correct errors relating to a number of accounting issues other than provisioning. In particular, management identified various errors involving recognition of revenues. To
identify, assess and remedy these errors, management, assisted by outside consultants, reviewed a
substantial number of individual transactions as well as significant accounting policies across all
of our major product lines and geographical regions. As part of our review of individual
contracts, we analyzed the relevant contractual provisions (such as delivery and acceptance terms),
delivery and other data from our logistics systems, characteristics of the particular products and
customers and the manner in which revenue recognition policies were applied. We also utilized
databases within our accounting systems to identify additional contracts that might raise revenue
recognition issues. In light of the increasing magnitude of the total revenue adjustments
identified by the beginning of November 2004, the Board of Directors directed management to conduct
additional focused revenue reviews in selected periods in order to test the conclusions we had
reached and identify any potential additional revenue adjustments. Management has completed these
reviews. Overall in the Second Restatement, as a result of adjustments to correct errors related to revenue
recognition, we increased revenues by an aggregate of
$1,491 million in 2001 and $440 million in
2002. We also decreased previously reported revenues for the first
three quarters of 2003 by an aggregate of $55 million (including
a decrease of $52 million and $133 million for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively). Most
of these adjustments constituted the recognition of revenues that had previously been improperly
recognized in prior years and should have been deferred (often over a number of years). This also
had the effect of reducing previously reported revenues in 1998, 1999 and 2000 by approximately
$158 million, $388 million and $2,833 million,
respectively (adjusted from $355 million in 1999 and
$2,866 million in 2000, as reported in our 2003 Annual Report). Of these adjustments identified in
the Second Restatement, approximately $1,200 million of revenues
has been deferred to the fourth quarter of 2003 and to years after
2003, while approximately $250 million of revenues was permanently reversed, as described below. In light of the total magnitude of these revenue adjustments, we present below an overview of the
principal revenue adjustments required in the Second Restatement to correct accounting errors
related to revenue recognition and the general circumstances that gave rise to them. In addition,
as described under Revenue Independent Review, the Audit Committee has determined to review the
facts and circumstances leading to the restatement of these revenues for specific transactions
identified in the Second Restatement. The Revenue Independent Review will have a particular
emphasis on the underlying conduct that led to the initial recognition of these revenues, and will
consider any appropriate additional remedial measures, including those involving internal controls
and processes.  
    
    Title and delivery  An increase of
$1,624 million in 2001 and $211 million in 2002. An increase of $35 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. Of this amount, we made
adjustments of approximately $870 million in 2001 and $200 million in 2002 to correct errors relating to passage of product
title or risk of loss. In the three and six months ended
June 30, 2003, we increased revenues by approximately
$10 million and $30 million, respectively. Both employee input and our review of the broader original accounting
treatment of certain individual contracts identified a specific customer contract as warranting
re-examination of the timing of revenue recognition relative to the timing of passage of product
title. Following a detailed review, we determined that revenues had been recorded erroneously
before title had passed. We also reviewed other similar 127




---



##### Table of Contents



contracts and determined that corrections were also required where title or risk of loss had not
passed. These corrections principally impacted North American contracts in our Optical and
Wireline businesses. Some of the adjustments related to title and risk of loss issues described above resulted in a
permanent reversal of revenues, rather than a deferral of revenues to later periods. In certain
cases, revenues were recognized in error in a particular period (before title had passed and the
criteria for revenue recognition had been met) and a bad debt expense was subsequently recorded due
to collectibility issues. In such cases, both entries were reversed. Following those corrections,
if title in fact never passed or the other criteria were never met, and the customer failed to pay,
the revenues were not recognized in subsequent periods but instead permanently reversed. We
permanently reversed a total of approximately $150 million of revenues in 2000 and $25 million in
2001 as a result of title and risk of loss adjustments. We also identified errors related to title and delivery issues in connection with arrangements
known as bill and hold transactions, in which revenue is recognized before actual delivery of the
product. Corrections of these errors resulted in the deferral of revenue into later periods, which
had the effect of a net increase to revenues of approximately
$760 million in 2001 and $10 million in
2002. In the second quarter of 2003, we decreased revenues by approximately $10 million. Our scrutiny of this issue was similarly prompted by employee input. In
this situation, we determined that the relevant accounting policy had been incorrectly applied to a
number of contracts, and revenues were recognized where the relevant criteria had not been fully
met. In reviewing individual contracts, we examined, among other things: whether significant
product returns had occurred in later periods, the accounts receivable history, whether better
pricing was provided for the particular purchase order to incent a customer to enter into a bill
and hold arrangement, whether purchase orders were eventually placed by the customer and whether
third-party corroboration was available as to whether the arrangement was at the request of the
customer or Nortel Networks. As a result of our consideration of these factors, we deferred all
revenues associated with bill and hold arrangements to subsequent periods. We no longer recognize
revenue on bill and hold arrangements before delivery occurs and all other criteria of revenue
recognition are fully met.  
    
    Undelivered elements and liquidated
damages  A decrease of $190 million in 2001 and
an increase of $45 million in 2002. A decrease of
$81 million in the three months ended June 30, 2003 and $98 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2003. Another area of review prompted by our review of the broader original accounting treatment of
certain individual contracts was related to certain optical product transactions where revenues
related to undelivered product elements were erroneously recognized. In these cases, revenues for
customer orders were recognized upon delivery of interim product solutions pending the availability
of the later generation optical product that the customer had ordered. In this circumstance,
revenues for the order should have been deferred until the undelivered element was delivered as we
did not have evidence supporting the fair value of the undelivered element. Accordingly, we
restated the recorded revenues, deferring recognition to subsequent periods, which had the effect
of a net decrease to revenues of approximately $40 million in 2001 and an increase to revenues of
approximately $190 million in 2002. In the six months ended
June 30, 2003, we increased revenues by approximately
$20 million. We also focused on accounting for software revenue recognition more generally, particularly in our
Optical business. In Fall 2004, we sought the views of the SECs Office of the Chief Accountant,
or OCA, on one issue with respect to our historical and continuing accounting treatment under U.S.
GAAP of revenues recognized on sales of certain optical products containing embedded software. We
advised the OCA that we believed our historical accounting treatment of these optical products was
appropriate, and we were fully supported in this conclusion by D&T. We, in consultation with D&T,
nevertheless decided to obtain the views of the OCA on our analysis and conclusions due to the
judgments involved in the applicable accounting analysis and the significant impact a different
conclusion could have had on our reported revenues (namely, the deferred recognition of substantial
revenues over a number of subsequent years). Following discussions with us, the OCA did not
approve or disapprove our accounting in this area, and we concluded that we would not make any
adjustments to our accounting treatment of the sales of these optical products as part of the
Second Restatement. We also considered revenue recognition policies related to post-contract support, or PCS, with
respect to all business lines, and identified certain Enterprise products that presented issues.
For these products, we recognized revenues at the time of delivery of the product but before
completion of PCS or other future services agreed to in the contract. Because in some cases we did
not have vendor specific objective evidence of fair value for those services (for example, where we
made available free software upgrades on our website), U.S. GAAP requires the revenues to be
recognized over the PCS period. Accordingly, we corrected this error and deferred the revenues to
subsequent periods, resulting in a net decrease to revenues of approximately $140 million in 2001
and $155 million in 2002. In the three and six months ended
June 30, 2003, we decreased revenues by approximately $80 million and $120 million, respectively). 128




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    Fixed or determinable fees  An increase of $133 million in 2002 . As a result of our focus on accounting for software revenue recognition more generally as
described above, we identified a specific contract for which revenue for sales had been recognized
but the criteria for revenue recognition had not been met, including the criteria that contract
fees be either fixed or determinable. Accordingly, we corrected this error and deferred the
revenues to subsequent periods when customer payments became due and all criteria for revenue
recognition were met.  
    
    Reseller transactions  An increase of $151 million in 2001. As a result of employee input, we determined that a certain reseller lacked economic substance
apart from Nortel Networks at the time of the relevant transaction. In such a case, we should have
deferred revenues and recognized them only upon the resellers sale of the products to an end
customer. Accordingly, we corrected this error and deferred the revenues to subsequent
periods .  
    
    Reciprocal arrangements  A decrease of approximately $55 million in 2000 and $20
million in 2001. In our review of a particular contract in connection with other issues described above, we
determined that it also involved a reciprocal arrangement with the customer. Instead of
recognizing the full amount of revenues we received on the sale of products or services, the
amounts we paid the customer under the reciprocal arrangement should have been treated as a
reduction of revenues. Through our review of a substantial number of individual contracts, as
noted above, we also identified a limited number of other reciprocal arrangements, which were
recorded as permanent reductions in revenue .  
    
    Application of SOP 81-1  A decrease of approximately $40 million in 2001 and a
net increase of approximately $80 million in 2002. An increase
of $36 million in the three months ended June 30, 2003 and
$18 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. All of
these adjustments relate solely to the application of SOP 81-1 and
not also to other revenue recognition items, as was reported in our
2003 Annual Report. As we continued to review the application of our accounting policies, as well as specific
contracts, we discovered errors related principally to the incorrect application of percentage of
completion accounting for certain transactions. We corrected these errors, which resulted in both
deferrals of revenues to subsequent periods and movement of revenues to earlier periods.  
    
    Application of accounting for subsequent events An increase of approximately $70  million in 2002. A decrease of approximately $70  million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. As we reviewed various transactions, we also considered the impact of subsequent events on the accounting treatment. As a result of this general review, we identified two specific transactions recorded in the first quarter of 2003 that should have been recorded in 2002, and made adjustments to correct these errors.  
    
    Persuasive evidence of an arrangement  A
decrease of $13  million in the three months ended June 30, 2003. As we reviewed the application of our accounting policies across our geographical regions, we identified a specific transaction in the Asia Pacific region for which revenues were recognized after a notice of award was received but before a contract was executed. Revenues should have been deferred until the contract was executed. We corrected this error, resulting in the deferral of revenue to subsequent periods. Other accounting practices that management examined and adjusted as part of the Second Restatement
included, among other things, the following (as described in more detail below):  
    
    our foreign exchange accounting, as part of the plan to address the identified material
weakness related to foreign currency translation described above;
    
    intercompany balances that did not eliminate upon consolidation and related provisions;
    
    special charges relating to inventory impairment, contract settlement costs and other charges; and
    
    the accounting treatment of certain elements of discontinued operations . In sum, the key components of the Second Restatement process were as follows :  
    
    involvement and oversight by current senior finance personnel, with regular
communications to the global finance organization to monitor progress and ensure
consistency, and open and regular dialogue with our external auditors;
    
    maintenance of a restatement database to track issues and adjustments; 129




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    establishment of a process to evaluate certain provisions and releases that may not have
been fully addressed in the First Restatement, including a review of all First Restatement
processes, and enhanced balance sheet reviews at the business unit, regional and statutory
entity levels;
    
    establishment of processes to evaluate certain potential restatement items related to
our revenue recognition policies and practices and other accounting issues;
    
    validation processes, including detailed review of supporting documentation to ensure
adjustments were appropriately substantiated; and
    
    identification, development and initial implementation of remedial actions, as further
described under Remedial Measures below. As discussed above under Current Management Conclusions Concerning Disclosure Controls and
Procedures, as a result of the extensive work undertaken in connection with the Second
Restatement, management believes, based on its knowledge, that (i) this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report and (ii) the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows as at, and for, the periods presented in this
report.  Principal Adjustments The following are the principal Second Restatement adjustments:  
    
    Adjustments to the previously reported 2003 quarterly
revenues and net earnings applicable to common shares as follows:  
    
    a decrease of $81 million in previously reported
revenues and $108 million in previously reported net earnings applicable to common shares for the first quarter of 2003, resulting
in our reporting a net loss rather than net earnings for the period;
    
    a decrease of $52 million in previously reported
revenues and $149 million in previously reported net earnings applicable to common shares for the second quarter of 2003,
resulting in our reporting a net loss rather than net earnings for
the period; and
    
    an increase of $78 million in previously reported revenues and a decrease
of $68 million in previously reported net earnings applicable to
common shares for the third quarter of 2003.  
    
    An increase of $440 million in previously reported
revenues and a reduction of $456 million in previously reported net loss applicable to common shares for the year ended December 31, 2002, with the
following adjustments on a quarterly basis:  
    
    an increase of $246 million in previously reported revenues and a
decrease of $174 million in previously reported net loss applicable to common shares for the first quarter of
2002;
    
    an increase of $131 million in previously reported revenues and a
decrease of $159 million in previously reported net loss applicable to common shares for the second quarter of
2002;
    
    a decrease of $28 million in previously reported
revenues and $232 million in previously reported net loss applicable to common shares for the third quarter of 2002; and
    
    an increase of $91 million in previously reported
revenues and $109 million in previously reported net loss applicable to common shares for the fourth quarter of 2002. 130




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    An increase of $1,491 million in previously reported
revenues and a reduction of $917 million in previously reported net loss applicable to common shares for the year ended December 31, 2001. The principal adjustments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 primarily relate to
the following matters (each of which reflects a number of related adjustments that have been
aggregated for disclosure purposes):  
    
    Adjustments to revenues and cost of revenues to address various aspects of our revenue
recognition policies and practices decreased revenues by a total of
$52 million and $133 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, and increased cost
of revenues by $90 million and $154 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2003, respectively. The revenue matters adjusted are discussed in more detail above under
Second Restatement Process.
    
    Foreign exchange adjustments increased our previously reported pre-tax earnings
by $7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and
decreased our previously reported pre-tax loss by $97 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2003. These adjustments
resulted primarily from the re-examination of the determination of the functional currency
for certain entities, the incorrect treatment of significant long-term inter-company
positions and revaluation errors related to certain foreign denominated customer financing
provisions within discontinued operations.
    
    Correction of certain inter-company balances that did not properly eliminate upon
consolidation and related provisions resulted in a decrease of
$15 million to previously reported pre-tax earnings and an increase of $21 million
to previously reported pre-tax loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.
    
    Adjustments to previously recorded special charges for restructuring relating to
contract settlement costs, including real estate related items,
severance and fringe benefit related costs and plant and equipment
impairment costs,
resulted in a decrease of $21 million and an increase of $8 million to special charges for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.
    
    Corrections to various accruals, provisions and other transactions, primarily due to
the incorrect application of U.S. GAAP to the initial recording of such liabilities, or
the failure to subsequently adjust such liabilities in the correct period, resulted in
a decrease of $97 million to previously reported pre-tax earnings and an increase of
$107 million to previously reported pre-tax loss for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2003, respectively.
    
    Adjustments to the accounting treatment of certain components of discontinued
operations, initially recognized in the second quarter of 2001, resulted in an increase of
$6 million (net of tax) to net loss from discontinued operations for the three months
ended June 30, 2003 and a decrease of $37 million (net of
tax) to net earnings from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003. For additional information concerning the Second Restatement adjustments for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2003, see note 2 to the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements and Developments in 2004  Nortel Networks Audit Committee Independent Review;
restatements; related matters in the MD&A section of this report. For information concerning the
Second Restatement adjustments for 2002 and 2001, see the Controls and Procedures section in our 2003 Annual Report.  Use of Estimates in Financial Reporting; Omission of 1999 and 2000 Selected Financial Data;
Decision Not to Amend Certain Previous Filings As described above, two material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting were
identified at the time of the First Restatement. During the Second Restatement process, a number
of additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting were identified,
as described below. Due to, among other factors, these material weaknesses, the significant
turnover in our finance personnel, changes in accounting systems, documentation weaknesses and the
passage of time generally, the Second Restatement involved the efforts of hundreds of our finance
personnel and a number of outside consultants and advisors. As described above, the process
required the review and verification of a substantial number of documents and communications, and
related accounting entries, over multiple fiscal periods. In addition, the review of accruals and provisions and the application of accounting literature to
certain matters in the Second Restatement, including revenue recognition, foreign exchange, special
charges and discontinued operations, was complicated by the passage of time, the lack of
availability of supporting records and the turnover of finance personnel noted above. As a 131




---



##### Table of Contents



result of this complexity, estimates and assumptions that impact both the quantum of the various
recorded adjustments and the fiscal period to which they were attributed were required in the
determination of certain of the Second Restatement adjustments. We believe the procedures followed
in determining such estimates were appropriate and reasonable using the best available information. Also as a result of the above factors, as well as a likely inability to obtain third party
corroboration in certain cases due to the substantial industry adjustment in the telecommunications
industry beginning in 2001, we believe that extensive additional efforts over an extended period of
time would be required to restate our 1999 and 2000 selected financial data. We also believe that
selected financial data for these periods would not be meaningful to investors due to this industry
adjustment, which significantly impacted our financial results in 2001 and subsequent periods and
limits the relevance of financial results in periods prior to 2001 for purposes of analysis of
trends in subsequent periods. Given the long delay in filing the Reports, we believed that
investor understanding would be better aided by the dedication of our resources to the preparation
of the current financial and other information included in this and future reports. As a result,
except for the selected balance sheet data as at December 31, 2000, financial data for the years
ended December 31, 1999 and 2000 was not restated or presented in the Selected Financial Data
(Unaudited) section of the 2003 Annual Reports. This omitted data is normally required to be
included in an Annual Report on Form 10‐K. A number of our and NNCs past filings with the SEC remain subject to ongoing review by the SECs
Division of Corporation Finance (which could result in the need to amend this or our other
filings). In addition, the Second Restatement involved the restatement of our consolidated
financial statements for 2001 and 2002 and the first, second and third quarters of 2003. Amendments
to our prior filings with the SEC would be required in order for us to be in full compliance with
our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act. However, for the same reasons discussed above,
we do not believe that it would be feasible for us to amend our 2002 Form 10‐K/A. In addition, we
believe that amended disclosure in the 2002 Form 10‐K/A, 2003 Form 10‐Q/As and 2003 Form 10‐Q would
in large part repeat the disclosure in the 2003 Annual Reports and this report and expected to be
contained in the other 2004 Form 10‐Qs. Accordingly, we do not plan
to amend our 2002 Form 10‐K/A,
2003 Form 10‐Q/As or 2003 Form 10‐Q. We believe that we have included in the 2003 Annual Reports
and this report all information needed for current investor understanding and will take similar
steps in our other 2004 Form 10‐Qs.  Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting Identified During the Second
Restatement Over the course of the Second Restatement process, we, together with D&T, identified a number of
reportable conditions, each constituting a material weakness, in our internal control over
financial reporting as at December 31, 2003. In September 2004, management first notified the
Audit Committee of the possibility of additional material weaknesses. Over the remainder of the
Second Restatement process, management and D&T identified a total of six material weaknesses. On
January 10, 2005, D&T confirmed to the Audit Committee that it had identified these six material
weaknesses. No other reportable conditions were identified by us or D&T at the
time of the Second Restatement or through January 31, 2005. The material weaknesses identified were:  
    
    lack of compliance with written Nortel Networks procedures for monitoring and
adjusting balances related to certain accruals and provisions, including restructuring
charges and contract and customer accruals;
    
    lack of compliance with Nortel Networks procedures for appropriately applying
applicable GAAP to the initial recording of certain liabilities, including those described
in SFAS No. 5, and to foreign currency translation as described in SFAS No. 52;
    
    lack of sufficient personnel with appropriate knowledge, experience and training in
U.S. GAAP and lack of sufficient analysis and documentation of the application of U.S.
GAAP to transactions, including, but not limited to, revenue transactions;
    
    lack of a clear organization and accountability structure within the accounting
function, including insufficient review and supervision, combined with financial reporting
systems that are not integrated and which require extensive manual interventions;
    
    lack of sufficient awareness of, and timely and appropriate remediation of, internal
control issues by Nortel Networks personnel; and 132




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    an inappropriate tone at the top, which contributed to the lack of a strong control
environment. As reported in the Independent Review Summary, there was a Management tone
at the top that conveyed the strong leadership message that earnings targets could be met
through application of accounting practices that finance managers knew or ought to have
known were not in compliance with U.S. GAAP and that questioning these practices was not
acceptable. The foregoing material weaknesses contributed to the need for the Second Restatement. Upon
completion of our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as at December 31,
2004 pursuant to SOX 404, we currently expect to conclude that the first five of these six material
weaknesses continued to exist as at December 31, 2004, and we continue to identify, develop and
begin to implement remedial measures to address them, as described below. * * * * * *  Current Status of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and
Expectations as to Required Management Conclusions and Independent Auditor Attestation
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act As noted in MD&A  Risk factors/Forward looking statements, our 2004 Form 10-K must comply with SOX
404, which requires management to assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting annually and to include in our Annual Report on Form 10-K a management report on that
assessment, together with an attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm. As
noted above, upon completion of our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as
at December 31, 2004, we currently expect to conclude that the first five of the six material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described immediately above continued
to exist as at December 31, 2004 (and also constitute material weaknesses as now defined under
standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board). Accordingly, management
expects to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2004 is
ineffective, and D&T has advised us that they expect their report on managements assessment of
internal control over financial reporting also to indicate that internal control over financial
reporting is ineffective. * * * * * *  Revenue Independent Review As more fully described above, over the course of the Second Restatement process, management
identified certain accounting practices that it determined should be adjusted as part of the Second
Restatement. In particular, management identified certain errors related to revenue recognition
and undertook a process of revenue reviews. In light of the resulting adjustments to previously
reported revenues, the Audit Committee has determined to review the facts and circumstances leading
to the restatement of these revenues for specific transactions identified in the Second
Restatement. The Revenue Independent Review will have a particular emphasis on the underlying
conduct that led to the initial recognition of these revenues. The Audit Committee will seek a
full understanding of the historic events that required the revenues for these specific
transactions to be restated and will consider any appropriate additional remedial measures,
including those involving internal controls and processes. The Audit Committee has engaged WCPHD
to advise it in connection with the Revenue Independent Review. * * * * * *  Remedial Measures At the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors adopted all of the
recommendations for remedial measures contained in the Independent Review Summary. The Board of
Directors has directed management to develop a detailed plan and timetable for the implementation
of these recommendations and will monitor their implementation. In addition, we have identified,
developed and begun to implement a number of measures to strengthen our internal control over
financial reporting and address the material weaknesses identified above, including pursuant to
recommendations from D&T. These measures are in the process of being reviewed in light of the
recommendations of the Independent Review and certain of these measures may be superseded by the
plans for the implementation of the recommendations of the Independent Review. A summary of these
measures, as well as previously announced personnel actions, follows. 133




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    Personnel Actions in Response to the First Restatement and Independent Review.  
    
    We terminated for cause our former president and chief executive officer, former chief
financial officer and former controller in April 2004 (the former chief financial officer and former
controller having been placed on paid leaves of absence in March 2004).
    
    We terminated for cause seven additional senior finance employees with significant
responsibilities for our financial reporting as a whole or for their respective business units and
geographic regions in August 2004.  
    
    Renewed Commitment to Best Corporate Practices and Ethical Conduct.  
    
    In August 2004, we adopted a new strategic plan that includes a renewed commitment to best
corporate practices and ethical conduct, including the establishment of the office of a chief ethics
and compliance officer (which has been filled on an interim basis pending the permanent appointment
of Susan E. Shepard effective February 21, 2005).
    
    Over the course of the Second Restatement, our current CEO and current CFO have communicated
to employees the importance of the Second Restatement process, reliable and transparent financial
reporting and ethical conduct. Those communications included formal presentations as part of our
annual executive conference in November 2004.
    
    In June 2004, management recommended, the joint leadership resources committee recommended
and the Board of Directors subsequently approved that financial accountability be included as a key
qualitative factor in the individual leadership performance objectives for determination of
incentive cash awards under our annual incentive plan.  
    
    Extended Balance Sheet Reviews.  
    
    We have developed a plan to extend our balance sheet reviews through the implementation of
enhanced review procedures to:  
    
    require greater frequency of timely statutory and segment balance sheet reviews,
    
    clarify responsibilities within Nortel Networks for organizing balance sheet reviews, and
    
    establish minimum documentation requirements with respect to balance sheet entries.  
    
    As part of the initial development of this plan, in the first quarter of 2004, we increased
our focus on the review of specific balance sheet accounts.  
    
    Review of Finance Department Organizational Structure. We announced, and began to implement,
plans to transform our finance organization, which include a renewed commitment to transparency as a
fundamental goal. Measures we have begun to implement include:  
    
    In the first quarter of 2004, we began to enhance our global technical accounting group and
establish global revenue governance and global finance governance teams.
    
    We engaged Accenture, a global management consulting and technology services firm, in the
third quarter of 2004 to assess the finance organizations structure, processes and systems, with an
expected assessment completion date of March 2005.
    
    We established a global corporate finance Sarbanes-Oxley compliance group beginning in the
third quarter of 2004. 134




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    We have hired additional full-time finance personnel (with a focus on qualified accounting
professionals) as part of an initiative introduced by the CFO and controller in March 2004.  
    
    Training Initiatives.  
    
    We re-established our formal training group (led by the global finance governance team
described above) to implement ongoing training programs for finance personnel globally. The groups
focus includes training with respect to SFAS No. 5; accounting for hedging and derivatives; revenue
recognition, accruals and provisions; and SFAS No. 52.  
    
    Internal Audit.  
    
    In the first quarter of 2004, we modified the mandate of our internal audit function to
place a greater emphasis on the adequacy of, and compliance with, procedures relating to internal
control over financial reporting.
    
    In October 2004, we engaged outside consultants to conduct a strategic performance review of
the internal audit function. The objective of this review is to ensure that internal audit continues
to meet professional internal audit standards and moves towards audit best practices.  
    
    Manual Journal Entry Processes.  
    
    In the fourth quarter of 2003, we began to modify our manual journal entry processes by
implementing new procedures, with a focus on approvals of manual journal entries, more stringent
documentation processes and reduction of user access to manual journal entry functions. As noted above, we continue to identify, develop and begin to implement remedial measures,
including the development of a detailed plan and timetable for the implementation of the
recommendations of the Independent Review. As part of the Revenue Independent Review, the Audit
Committee will also consider any appropriate additional remedial measures, including those
involving internal controls and processes. The above mentioned changes in internal control over financial reporting materially affected our
internal control over financial reporting, and these changes and expected changes as a result of
remedial measures to be developed and implemented are reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal control over financial reporting in the future. We intend to continue to make ongoing
assessments of our internal controls and procedures periodically and as a result of the
recommendations of the Independent Review and any additional recommendations of the Revenue
Independent Review. 135




---



##### Table of Contents



PART II OTHER INFORMATION 
  ITEM 1.
    
    Legal Proceedings The following includes updated information relating to certain of our material legal
proceedings as previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003. A class action lawsuit against NNC was also filed in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of shareholders who acquired the
securities of JDS Uniphase Corporation, or JDS, between January 18, 2001 and February 15, 2001,
alleging violations of the same U.S. federal securities laws as the
more than twenty-five purported class action lawsuits subsequent to the February 15, 2005 announcement in
which Nortel Networks provided revised guidance for financial
performance for the 2001 fiscal year and the first quarter of
2001 (see Contingencies
in note 18 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements.) The
district court granted NNCs motion to dismiss the action on the grounds that plaintiffs lacked
standing to bring the action, and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal.
On January 10, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court Order denied the plaintiffs appeal, ending the JDS
litigation. Subsequent to the March 10, 2004 announcement in which NNC indicated it was likely that we and
it would need to revise our previously announced unaudited results for the year ended December
31, 2003, and the results reported in certain of our quarterly reports for 2003, and to restate
our previously filed financial results for one or more earlier periods, NNC and certain of its
then current and former officers and directors were named as defendants in 27 purported class
action lawsuits. These lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York on behalf of shareholders who acquired NNC securities as early as February 16, 2001 and as
late as May 15, 2004, allege, among other things, violations of U.S. federal securities laws.
These matters are also the subject of investigations by Canadian and U.S. securities regulatory
and criminal investigative authorities. On June 30, 2004, the Court signed Orders
consolidating the 27 class actions and appointing lead plaintiffs and lead counsel. The
plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint on September 10, 2004, alleging a class
period of April 24, 2003 through and including April 27, 2004. On November 5, 2004, NNC and the
Audit Committee Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint.
On January 18, 2005, the lead plaintiffs, NNC, and the Audit Committee Defendants reached an
agreement in which NNC would withdraw its motion to dismiss and plaintiffs would dismiss Count
II of the complaint which asserts a claim against the Audit Committee Defendants. Except as noted above, there have been no material developments in our material legal
proceedings. For additional discussion of our material legal proceedings, see Contingencies
in note 18 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. 136




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 6.
    
    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K  (a)
    
    Exhibits10.1
    
    Summary statement of terms of initial compensation arrangements related to the president and
chief executive officer approved by the Board of Directors of Nortel Networks Corporation and
Nortel Networks Limited as of April 29, 2004.*10.2
    
    Master Facility Agreement dated February 14, 2003, as amended July 10, 2003, between Nortel
Networks Limited and Export Development Canada, as amended by a Letter Agreement dated March
29, 2004, and as further amended by a Letter Agreement dated May 28, 2004 (filed as Exhibit
99.2 to Nortel Networks Limiteds Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2004).10.3
    
    Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 29, 2004 between Nortel Networks Limited, Flextronics
International Ltd. and Flextronics Telecom Systems, Ltd.**10.4
    
    Amended and Restated Master Contract Manufacturing Services Agreement dated June 29, 2004 between Nortel Networks
Limited and Flextronics Telecom Systems, Ltd.**10.5
    
    Master Repair Services Agreement dated June 29, 2004 between Nortel Networks Limited and Flextronics Telecom Systems,
Ltd.**10.6
    
    Master Contract Logistics Services Agreement dated June 29, 2004 between Nortel Networks Limited and Flextronics Telecom
Systems, Ltd.**10.7
    
    Letter Agreement dated June 29, 2004 between Nortel Networks Limited, Flextronics International Ltd. and Flextronics
Telecom Systems, Ltd.31.1
    
    Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.
    
    Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.(b)
    
    Reports on Form 8-KNortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2004 related to a
press release updating the status of the Securities and Exchange Commission inquiry.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 14, 2004 related to a
press release updating the status of the Ontario Securities Commission inquiry.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 28, 2004 related to a
press release announcing the appointment of William A. Owens as President and Chief
Executive Officer, other management changes and an update on a number of matters, including
the status of certain prior year financial statements.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated April 28, 2004 amending
debt securities information contained in a press release dated March 10, 2004.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 29, 2004 related to a
press release announcing the appointment of Dr. rer. Pol. Manfred Bischoff to the Nortel
Networks Board of Directors.  * Incorporated by reference.

** Certain portions of this Exhibit have been omitted based upon a request for
confidential treatment. These portions have been filed separately with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.
 137




---



##### Table of Contents



Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 14, 2004 related to a
press release announcing Nortel Networks receipt of a federal grand jury subpoena from the
U.S. Attorneys Office for the production of certain documents.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 18, 2004 related to a
press release announcing a temporary cease trade order issued by the Ontario Securities
Commission.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 25, 2004 related to the
resignation of Frank Andrew Dunn as a director effective May 21, 2004.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 26, 2004 related to a
press release announcing the appointment of The Hon. John Manley to the Nortel Networks
Board of Directors.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2004 related to a
press release announcing that Nortel Networks Limited had obtained a new waiver from Export
Development Canada.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 2, 2004 related to a
press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 related to a
press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 23, 2004 related to a
press release announcing court approval for extending the time for calling the 2004 Annual
Shareholders Meeting.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 24, 2004 related to a
letter received from the Toronto Stock Exchange advising of a breach of its financial
statements filing requirements.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 29, 2004 related to a
press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2004 related to an
agreement reached with Flextronics International Ltd.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 13, 2004 related to a
press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2004 related to a
press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 10, 2004 related to
a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 17, 2004 related to
a press release providing a status update of the RCMP review.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 19, 2004 related to
a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 20, 2004 related to
a press release announcing a new waiver from Export Development Canada.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 2, 2004 related
to a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 2, 2004 related
to an employment agreement with William Owens, President and Chief Executive Officer. 138




---



##### Table of Contents



Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 16, 2004 related
to a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2004 related
to a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and
announcing a new waiver from Export Development Canada.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated September 30, 2004
amending details of its previously announced work plan contained in a press release dated
August 19, 2004.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2004 related to
a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated October 18, 2004 updating
certain information concerning the timing and implementation of certain matters under the
existing agreement with Flextronics International Ltd. contained in a press release dated
June 29, 2004.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 27, 2004 related to
a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 2, 2004 related to
a press release announcing a new waiver from Export Development Canada.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 12, 2004 related
to a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 19, 2004 related
to a press release announcing a new waiver from Export Development Canada.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 24, 2004
related to a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process
and other matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2004 updating
certain information concerning Nortel Networks Corporations Annual Shareholders Meeting.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 8, 2004 related to
a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004 related
to a press release announcing a new waiver from Export Development Canada.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2004 related
to a press release providing limited estimated unaudited financial results for the third
quarter of 2004, and updated limited estimated unaudited results for the first and second
quarters of 2004 and for the years 2001, 2002 and 2003.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2004 related
to a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 4, 2005 related to
a press release advising that the New York Stock Exchange has granted a three month
extension to file the 2003 Annual Reports on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 7, 2005 related to
a press release providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2005 related to
a press release regarding the filing of Nortel Networks Corporations 2003 financial
statements. 139




---



##### Table of Contents



Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 11, 2005 related to
a press release announcing the filing of Nortel Networks Corporations Annual Report on Form
10-K.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 13, 2005 related to
an employment agreement with Susan E. Shepard in connection with her appointment of Chief
Ethics and Compliance Officer and the appointment of Richard McCormick and Harry Pearce as
directors.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 14, 2005 related to
a press release announcing a new waiver from Export Development Canada.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 19, 2005 related to
a press release announcing the filing of Nortel Networks Limiteds 2003 annual financial
statements.Nortel Networks Limited filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 20, 2005 related to
the appointment of two new directors of Nortel Networks Limited and the appointment of the
new directors to certain committees of the Boards of Directors of Nortel Networks
Corporation and Nortel Networks Limited. 140




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
(Registrant) Chief Financial Officer
    
    Chief Accounting Officer/s/ WILLIAM R. KERR
    
    /s/ MARYANNE E. PAHAPILLWILLIAM R. KERR
    
    MARYANNE E. PAHAPILLChief Financial Officer
    
    Controller
 Date: January 31, 2005  141