alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                      28,481,764
<SECURITIES>                                 1,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,095,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                   437,856
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            59,769,980
<PP&E>                                       4,290,012
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,295,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,064,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,538,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,850
<OTHER-SE>                                  69,596,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,064,106
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           102,702,380
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              131,156,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             746,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (28,600,868)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   324,820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (28,925,688)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (28,925,688)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.52)
        

</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9083)

#### Carl Fischer Musical Instrument Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 818, etc.

(Decided February 25, 1958)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to certain musical instruments, identified by the invoice items marked *“A”*and checked “RDE,” that were imported from France and entered at the port of New York.

Stipulated facts upon which these appeals for reappraisement have been submitted establish that cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for appraisement of the musical instruments in question, as hereinabove identified, and that such statutory value for these articles “is equal to the invoice values,” and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 49500.

#### Petition 6370-R of Joseph C. Murray & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared in this case that the broker, in making the entry, used the same process as is usually used in such eases, but the examiner was unable to find that there was a United States value for the merchandise under the provisions of section 402 (e), as construed by the courts, because there were no prototype shipments sold in the New York market at the time of the exportation of the instant shipments. On the record presented the court found that the entries were made without intention to misrepresent the facts or defraud the revenue of the United States. The petition was therefore granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jose
Araque, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Jose Araque
    ------------------------------------
    Jose Araque, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 15, 2006
Exhibit 31.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Frank Libutti certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Digital Fusion, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

       b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

         Date: March 30, 2006           By:    /s/ Frank Libutti
                                                   -----------------------------
                                               Frank Libutti
                                               Chief Executive Officer
# C_2013147EN.01003303.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/33

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 19 March 2013 — BR v Commission

(Case F-13/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Member of the temporary service - Non-renewal of a contract)

2013/C 147/62

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BR (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that BR must bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that BR must bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 32.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  section  1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Interplay  Entertainment  Corp., a Delaware  corporation
(the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify with respect to the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December  31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report") that:

     (1)  the 10-K Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information  contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:    June 3, 2005

                                               /S/ HERVE CAEN
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Herve Caen
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Interim Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 10.27**

 

Description of Severance Policy 

 

On June 28, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a severance policy, effective July 1, 2005, whereby (i) each senior vice president who is terminatedwithout cause shall be entitled to receive the equivalent of his or her base salary, less applicable withholding, for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of his or her termination, and (ii) each vice president who is terminated withoutcause shall be entitled to receive the equivalent of his or her base salary, less applicable withholding, for a period of six (6) months from the date of his or her termination.
EXHIBIT 32.1


   CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


The  undersigned,  Christina  M.  Strauch,  Chairman of the Board of  Directors,
Principal  Executive Officer,  Treasurer and Principal  Financial Officer of Rim
Holdings Inc. (the  "Company"),  has executed this  certification  in connection
with the filing with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the Company's
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  December  31,  2003 (the
"Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
12th day of February, 2004.


                                             /s/ Christina M. Strauch
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Christina M. Strauch
                                             Chairman of the Board of Directors,
                                             Principal Executive Officer,
                                             Treasurer and Principal Financial
                                             Officer
# C_2014292EN.01003401.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-52/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Compensation payments made by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) in 2008 and 2009 - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Concept of State aid - Article 107(3)(b) and (c) TFEU - Guidelines for State aid in the agricultural sector))

2014/C 292/40

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented initially by I. Chalkias and S. Papaïoannou, then by I. Chalkias and A. Vasilopoulou, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by D. Triantafyllou and S. Thomas, then by D. Triantafyllou and R. Sauer, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision 2012/157/EU of 7 December 2011 concerning compensation payments made by the Greek Agricultural Insurance Organisation (ELGA) in 2008 and 2009 (OJ 2012 L 78, p. 21).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs, including those relating to the action for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs, including those relating to the action for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.

1

---
# C_2012184EN.01001901.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/19

---

Action brought on 20 April 2012 — Wirtgen v OHIM (Shape of a chisel holder)

(Case T-179/12)

2012/C 184/34

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH (Windhagen, Germany) (represented by S. Jackermeier, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 February 2012 in Case R 1923/2011-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 February 2012 in Case R 1923/2011-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the three-dimensional mark in the form of a chisel holder for goods in Class 7 — application No 9 749 631

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 37(3), the second sentence of Article 75, Article 63(2), the first part of Article 76(1) and Article 77(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 and infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2012227EN.01002502.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/25

---

Action brought on 29 May 2012 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — LĺDL MUSIC (LIDL express)

(Case T-225/12)

2012/C 227/43

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Schaeffer, M. Wolter and A. Marx, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: LĺDL MUSIC, spol. s r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 21 March 2012 (R 2379/2010-1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 21 March 2012 (R 2379/2010-1);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘LIDL express’ for goods in class 15 — Community trade mark application No 6 857 536

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative mark and community word mark ‘LÍDL MUSIC’ for goods in class 15

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 15(1) in combination with Article 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 and Rule 22(3) and (4) of Commission Regulation No 2868/95; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 15(1) in combination with Article 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 and Rule 22(3) and (4) of Commission Regulation No 2868/95;

| — | Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) in combination with Article 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) in combination with Article 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1320

CECELIA D. WALTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00054-MR-DLH)

Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 30, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cecelia D. Walton, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cecelia D. Walton appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment 

discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walton v. N.C. Dep’t 

of Commerce, No. 1:17-cv-00054-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2018). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in 

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIodine Satellite Propellant Feed Clog-Clearing Demonstration TestingExperiments are conducted to quantify the formation and clearing of iodine clogs in an iodine feed system. Deposits in the low-pressure portion of the system near the exit to vacuum appear to be relatively small in extent and incomplete in blocking the flow, and they are relatively easy to remove with the re-application of heating, disappearing in minutes. Clogs forming upstream, nearer to the higher-pressure propellant tank, appear to completely block the flow, are much larger in spatial extent, and form much more rapidly than the low-pressure blockages. Significantly more effort is required to remove upstream deposits.Document ID20180008435Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPolzin, K. A.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 12, 2018Publication DateDecember 1, 2018Subject CategoryPropellants And FuelsReport/Patent NumberM18-1478NASA/TM-2018-220128Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180008435.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024