alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of DCI USA, Inc. (the "Company")
does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 26, 2005                /s/ Michael Gibbs
                                      -----------------------
                                      Michael Gibbs
                                      Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EncryptaKey, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Louis Jack Musetti, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Interim Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for
the periods presented in the Report.




Date: July 31, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      Louis Jack MusettiName:
            Louis
      Jack MusettiTitle:
            Principal
      Executive Officer, President, Directorand Principal Accounting Officer
### Surface water supply of the United States 1961-65: Part 6, Missouri River basin: Volume 2. Missouri River basin from Williston, North Dakota to Sioux City, Iowa

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1917

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 28589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9719]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2006-26112; Directorate Identifier 2006-NE-35-AD; 
Amendment 39-14837; AD 2006-24-08]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) PW535A 
Turbofan Engines; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting airworthiness directive (AD) 2006-24-08. 
That AD applies to Pratt & Whitney Canada (P&WC) PW535A turbofan 
engines. We published that AD in the Federal Register on December 4, 
2006 (71 FR 70284). The fuel manifold part number (P/N) 3025267-01 
listed in paragraph (c) is incorrect. This document corrects that P/N. 
In all other respects, the original document remains the same.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective May 22, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian Dargin, Aerospace Engineer, Engine 
Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New 
EnglandExecutive Park, Burlington, MA, 01803; telephone (781) 238-7178; 
fax (781) 238-7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 4, 2006 (71 FR 70284), we 
published a final rule AD, FR Doc, E6-20204, in the Federal Register. 
That AD applies to P&WC PW535A turbofan engines. We need to make the 
following correction:


Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

    On page 70286, in the second column, in paragraph (c), in the 
fourth line, ``3025267-01'' is corrected to read ``3052627-01''.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 14, 2007.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7-9719 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
No. D-34.

#### In re Disbarment of Kerr.

It having been reported to this Court that Elaine Worley Kerr, of Bailey’s Crossroads, Va., has been disbarred from the practice of law in all of the courts of the State of Maryland and disbarred from the practice of law in the District of' Columbia, and this Court by order of January 20, 1975 [419 U. S. 1118], having suspended the said Elaine Worley Kerr from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring her to show cause why she should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that a response has been filed;

It is ordered that the said Elaine Worley Kerr be, and she is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
```

[107th Congress Public Law 2]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ002.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 4]]

Public Law 107-2
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 1 Courthouse Way in 
   Boston, Massachusetts, as the ``John Joseph Moakley United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Mar. 13, 2001 -  [H.R. 559]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 1 Courthouse Way in Boston, 
Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as the ``John Joseph 
Moakley United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Joseph 
Moakley United States Courthouse''.

    Approved March 13, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 559:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Feb. 14, considered and passed House.
            Feb. 15, considered and passed Senate.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 37 (2001):
            Mar. 13, Presidential remarks.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-114145 and 333-121937 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos.
333-37648, 333-55260, 333-67784, 333-69504, 333-99473, and 333-120108 on Form S-8 of our reports dated
June 6, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. and management's report on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2005.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Houston,
Texas
June 6, 2005

---
# C_2014052EN.01003601.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2014 — Steiff v OHIM (Fabric tag with metal button in the middle section of the ear of a soft toy)

(Case T-434/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a fabric tag with metal button in the middle section of the ear of a soft toy - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009)

2014/C 52/67

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Margarete Steiff GmbH (Giengen an der Brenz, Germany) (represented by: D. Fissl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2012 (Case R 1692/2011-1) concerning an application for registration of a sign consisting of a fabric tag with metal button in the middle section of the ear of a soft toy as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Margarete Steiff GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Margarete Steiff GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 366, 24.11.2012.

1

---
No. 96-7957.

#### Veatch *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CoStar
Group, Inc.


2
Bethesda Metro Center, 10th floor


Bethesda,
MD 20814





February
25, 2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


450 5th
Street, NW


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:  Certification Of Principal
      Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
  1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoStar Group,
Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2009, I, Andrew C. Florance, Chief
Executive Officer of CoStar Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1) such
Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoStar Group, Inc., for the year ended December
31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and





2) the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of CoStar Group, Inc.,
for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of CoStar Group,
Inc.





By:
            /s/
      Andrew C. FloranceAndrew
      C. FloranceChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer andDuly
      Authorized Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CoStar Group, Inc. and will be retained by
CoStar Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





In
accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is being
“furnished” as Exhibit 32.1 to CoStar Group, Inc.’s annual report and shall not
be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that
section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by
specific reference in such a filing.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1889 

To protect children from neglect and abuse on Federal property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2011 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To protect children from neglect and abuse on Federal 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Children’s 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHILD ABUSE REPORTING. 

7 Section 226 of the Victims of Child Abuse Act of 

8 1990 (42 U.S.C. 13031) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘A person’’ and inserting 

11 the following: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1889 IS

1 ‘‘(1) COVERED PROFESSIONAL.—Any person’’; 

2 and 

3 (B) by inserting at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(2) OTHER PERSONS.—In addition to those 

5 persons in paragraph (1), any person who, while on 

6 Federal land or in a federally operated (or con7 tracted) facility, learns of facts that give reason to 

8 suspect that a child has suffered an incident of child 

9 abuse, shall as soon as possible make a report of the 

10 suspected abuse to the agency designated under sub11 section (d).’’; 

12 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘subsection 

13 (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(1)’’; and 

14 (3) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘mandated re15 porter groups’’ and inserting ‘‘covered professionals 

16 described in subsection (b)’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Distribution’s Marshall presented commander’s coin

By Brianne M. BenderDLA Distribution Command Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
Current Operations’ Cory Marshall received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event March 27.

Marshall recently led efforts to prepare facility reduction information for the recent review of the Dynamic Operating Plan.

Additionally, he created an in-depth presentation on the history and way ahead regarding infrastructure optimization and footprint reduction opportunities.  Marshall spent numerous hours and attended nearly a dozen meetings, while creating an abundance of optimization strategies to generate a cohesive, flowing presentation.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA Distributionaward
(Reap. Dec. 9667)

#### American Roland Corp. v. United States

Entry Nos. 1014690; 1024830.

(Decided April 18, 1960)

*Eugene R. Piekrell*for tlie plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the respective parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reappraisement, consist of Ascorbic Acid, imported from France, which merchandise was appraised on a foreigh value, as defined under the provisions of Section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, at French francs 4800 per kilo net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is French francs 4300 per kilo net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

*658On the agreed facts, I hold the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value in each instance was French francs 4,300 per kilo, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2012165EN.01002401.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/24

---

Action brought on 23 March 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Orly International (SPARITUAL)

(Case T-131/12)

2012/C 165/41

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Spa Monopole compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: L. De Brouwer, E. Cornu and É. De Gryse, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Orly International, Inc (Van Nuys, USA)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 January 2012 in Case R 2396/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 January 2012 in Case R 2396/2010-1;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘SPARITUAL’ for goods in Class 3 — Community trade mark applied for No 3631884

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Benelux registrations of the word marks ‘SPA’ and ‘Les Thermes de Spa’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 32 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the contested decision and rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 in the assessment of the reputation of the word mark ‘SPA’ in Class 32 and infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 in the assessment of the likelihood that unfair advantage would be taken of the repute of the mark ‘SPA’.

Pleas in law:

---