alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.97





Exhibit 4.97


CCM CONSULTING

TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTRACT

Whereas, the “Company” NEVADA GOETHERMAL POWER INC. is the
publicly traded Company, and any successors thereof, that is entering into a
consulting relationship (s) (the “Program”) with CCM Consulting, a division of
Cronus Capital Markets, Inc., its partners and affiliates, and the “Client,” if
not the Company, is a Third Party.

	I. 	Payment and signature below signifies
      Agreement as follows: 
	  	  
	A. 	All consulting services last for 1 full year.
    
	  	  
	B 	Any unpaid balances after 90-days shall be
      charged interest at the then-prevailing prime rate plus one (1%) percent.
      Any failure to pay as invoiced shall subject the Company to a Suspension
      and/or Termination of the coverage at CCM Research's discretion, after
      sixty (60) days past due, due to analyst accessibility being
  paramount.
	
	  	  
	C. 	Upon any Suspension and/or Termination, the
      full amounts invoiced, plus accrued interest, plus any amounts discounted
      or credited, shall become immediately due and payable and the signee(s)
      below agrees to pay the full balance due, and if litigated, to also pay
      reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs associated with a successful
      collection. The province of Ontario and/or New York State shall be the
      venue for all legal actions, if any.
	  	  
	D. 	Cronus Capital Markets, Inc., its partners and
      affiliates, will have the right to disseminate and distribute all Reports
      and other information through agreed upon distribution channels, both
      public and private, under the Company's ticker symbols, and the Company
      shall not attempt to interfere with the publication or distribution of a
      report in any manner.
	
	  	  
	E. 	Coverage is subject to the requirements at
      http://www.shareholdersresearch.com, as
      well as subject to the “Standards For Independent Research Providers” at
      http://www.firstresearchconsortium.com
      
	
	  	  
	F. 	The Company will assist and facilitate the
      Analyst's information-gathering in a timely fashion, and to expedite the
      review(s) of the Analyst's Errors and Omissions draft(s) by a Qualified
      Officer of the Company. Failure to do so may result in Suspension of
      Coverage. 
	
	  	  
	G. 	All research reports and related news
      announcements include disclosures related to cost and analyst
    statements.
	 
	  	  
	II. 	Upon receipt of agreed fees, CCM Consulting
      shall provide services as follows: 
	  	  
	A. 	The provisions of this contract can be found in
      Exhibit A. 






An officer of the Company should sign below and fax to Cronus
Capital Markets at 416-368-3701. Include a return fax number for countersigning
purposes.

Thank you.

	*BY THE COMPANY: 
	SIGNATURE /s/ Brian D. Fairbank 
	PRINT NAME Brian D. Fairbank 
	TITLE CEO + President 
	DATE November 28th , 2007

	FAX NUMBER: 604-688-5926 
	  	  
	BY CRONUS CAPITAL MARKETS: 
	SIGNATURE /s/ Micheal Soni 
	PRINT NAME Micheal Soni
	TITLE President and CEO 
	DATE November 22nd ,
      2007 
	FAX NUMBER: 416-368-3701
#### James A. ABRAVAYA, Appellant, v. Yanira B. GONZALEZ, Appellee.

No. 98-3200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 16, 1999.

Arthur J. Morburger, for appellant.

Yanira E. Gonzalez, in proper person.

Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER, and SHEVIN, JJ.

GERSTEN, J.

James A. Abravaya appeals an order granting a domestic violence injunction in favor of his former girlfriend, Yanira E. Gonzalez. We affirm.

Ms. Gonzalez filed a domestic violence petition seeking an injunction against Mr. Abravaya after a traffic incident. At the domestic violence injunction hearing, Ms. Gonzalez testified that Mr. Abravaya threatened her well being by driving his truck on-an expressway in an erratic and threatening manner. According to Ms. Gonzalez, Mr. Abravaya intentionally prevented her from exiting the highway at her *578desired exit and rear-ended her vehicle a couple of times. The trial court found Ms. Gonzalez’s testimony to be credible and granted the domestic violence injunction.

On appeal, Mr. Abravaya argues that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the domestic violence injunction, claiming the evidence was insufficient to support it. We disagree.

Ms. Gonzalez’s testimony, alone, sufficed to support the issuance of the instant injunction. *See e.g. Thomas v. State,*167 So.2d 309 (Fla.1964); *Moore v. State,*468 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); *Polaco v. Smith,*376 So.2d 409 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), *cert. denied,*386 So.2d 640 (Fla.1980). Her testimony was internally consistent and was, furthermore, consistent with testimony provided by an independent bystander.1

The facts of this case sadly reflect a pattern of behavior commonly known as the “general cycle of domestic violence.”2 We commend the trial judge for his astute credibility determination in deciding to grant the domestic violence injunction. Hopefully, this early grant of injunctive relief will help prevent the cycle of domestic violence from escalating to the consequence that all domestic violence judges dread —• injury or death.

Affirmed.

1

. This byslander's testimony would also have sufficed, alone, to support the issuance of the instant injunction.

2

. The cycle of domestic violence is commonly believed to consist of three distinct phases: the tension-building phase, the aggressive acts or battery phase, and the loving and apologetic phase. *See e.g.*Laurie Salame, *A National Swvey of Stalking Laws: A Legislative Trend Comes to the Aid of Domestic Violence Victims and Others,*27 Suffolk U.L.Rev. 67, 83 (1993).
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| (1)   | the                accompanying Form 10-KSB/A report for the period ending July 31,                2006 as                filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report")                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

*Date:      *
*October      30*
*,      2006 *
*                  /s/      Dave      Warkentin*

*------------------------------------*

*Dave      Warkentin, President and Chief Executive Officer*
No. 96-5919.

#### Aparacio-Rodriguez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 102]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3014]]

Public Law 111-102
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 4282 Beach Street in Akron, Michigan, as the ``Akron Veterans Memorial 
         Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2009 -  [H.R. 2004]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AKRON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4282 Beach Street in Akron, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Akron Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Akron 
Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved November 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2004:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Sept. 8, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2013225EN.01007701.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/77

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 May 2013 — Brauerei Beck v OHIM — Aldi (Be Light)

(Case T-172/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Be Light - Earlier Community mark BECK’s - relative ground for refusal - No similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2013/C 225/171

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Brauerei Beck GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and C. Töbelmann Valeska, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (representanted by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, L. Kolks and C. Fürsen Cay, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 January 2012 (Case R 2258/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Brauerei Beck GmbH & Co. KG and Aldi GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Brauerei Beck GmbH & Co. KG to pay, besides its own costs, those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Aldi GmbH & Co. KG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Brauerei Beck GmbH & Co. KG to pay, besides its own costs, those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Aldi GmbH & Co. KG.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.

1

---
University of Kentucky
    UK Libraries
    Special Collections Research Center
Menu
    About
                    About ExploreUK
            How to
                    Activate your Researcher AccountRequest MaterialsVisit SCRCFind Copyright and Use Information
            Contact Us
            Researcher Account LoginSearch Home |
    Back to Search Results

Download
    JPEGof this page
    PDFof entire itemCombined Farming-Industrial Employment in Charlestown County, South Carolina
Date
1936Creator
United States Works Progress Administration Division of Social Research Rural Section.Language
EnglishCollection
South Carolina Works Progress Administration PublicationsDescription
Preliminary report; Prepared by W. W. Troxell and others; 66 leaves: illustrations, maps, charts, 27 cm; Cover title has Research Bulletin (Not for Release); UK holds archival copy for ASERL Collaborative Federal Depository Program libraries; Call number Y 3.W 89/2:13/J3

You may come across language in UK Libraries Special Collections Research Center collections and online resources that you find harmful or offensive. SCRC collects materials from different cultures and time periods to preserve and make available the historical record. These materials document the time period when they were created and the view of their creator. As a result, some may demonstrate racist and offensive views that do not reflect the values of UK Libraries.

If you find description with problematic language that you think SCRC should review, please contact us at SCRC@uky.edu.

Item Details
Text

Rights
This digital resource may be freely searched and displayed in accordance with U. S. copyright laws.Geographic Subject
Charlestown County, South CarolinaPublisher
Washington, D.C.Format
booksPermalink
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/catalog/xt7q833n0710XML Metadata
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7q833n0710/data/mets.xml

The text may or may not be an accurate representation of the original.
Exhibit 31.3


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-


OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Raymond L. Gellein, Jr., certify that:


|   |                                                                                
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc.;

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Date: March 12, 2014


/s/ Raymond L. Gellein, Jr.Raymond L. Gellein, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of MILLENNIUM CAPITAL VENTURE HOLDINGS,
INC.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Francis Mailhot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ Francis Mailhot
   --------------------------------
   Francis Mailhot, Chief Executive
   Officer


Dated: March 16, 2005
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as of January 18, 2008, by and between
Document Capture Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation with principal
executive offices at 1772 Technology Drive, San Jose, California 95110
(hereinafter referred to as the "Company"), and David Clark, an individual
residing at 13465 Southfields Road, Wellington, Florida 33414 (hereinafter
referred to as "Employee").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee are parties to an Employment Agreement,
dated April 26, 2005 (the "Original Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to continue to employ the Employee as its Chief
Investment Officer, and the Employee desires to serve the Company in that
capacity, upon the terms and subject to the conditions contained in the Original
Agreement, as amended by this Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein
contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Original Agreement.

2. The Employee agrees to continue to execute his duties and responsibilities in
accordance with the terms and provisions of the Original Agreement, subject to
the following terms and conditions as agreed upon:

      (a)   The first sentence of Section 2.a shall be replaced in its entirety
            by: "Subject to Section 9 and Section 10 below, the term of this
            Agreement shall be for a period of forty-two (42) months commencing
            on April 26th, 2005 (the Term)."

      (b)   Effective January 1, 2008, Employee shall be paid a base pay of
            $175,000 per year during the Term.

      (c)   The Company shall employ Employee as Chief Investment Officer.

All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement not affected hereby
shall remain in effect as originally drafted.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.

DOCUMENT CAPTURE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                       EMPLOYEE

By: /S/ DARWIN HU                        /S/ DAVID CLARK
    -------------                        ---------------
    Darwin Hu                            David Clark
    Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Frank W. Tilley, Director of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Frank W. Tilley
Frank W. Tilley
Director of Finance
November 14, 2002

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
# C_2013377EN.01002303.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/23

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-94/12)

(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Lawyer’s hand-written signature different from that on the original application received by post - Action lodged out of time - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 377/54

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s claim for compensation in the sum of EUR 20 000 on account of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of breach of confidentiality of medical information.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Innovating compressor blade inspection 

By Corrie PolandAir Force Operational Energy (SAF/IEN)

                PENTAGON, Va.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Air Force Installations, Environment and Energy website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

operational energyfuel efficiencyturbinescompressor bladesAir Force Research LaboratorysustainmentAir Force Operational Energymaintenance