alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9884)

#### Mars Export & Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 785644; 786380.

(Decided December 29, 1960)

*Ilse G. Coe*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted these two appeals for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement of the above entitled cases are the same in all material respects as the issues in *Paramount Import Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9697, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise involved in the above cases, less the amounts added as 15% buying commission, is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Czechoslovakia in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, packed ready for delivery, and that the foreign values of such or similar merchandise were no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

In the incorporated case, I held that a charge of 15 per centum paid by the American importer to a foreign commissionaire for services rendered in connection with the purchase of merchandise in the foreign market was a *bona fide*buying commission and, as such, did not enter into the dutiable value of the merchandise.

On the agreed facts and following my cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in *552question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value for the merchandise involved in each of these appeals for reappraisement is the appraised value, less the amount added as 15 per centum buying commission.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Jenny and James MAXWELL, et al. v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, et al.

No. 98-C-2711.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Maxwell, James; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of West Feliciana 20th Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 13012; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CA97 2077.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J. not on panel.
Order entered November 5, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01340-CR

EX PARTE CARLOS MALDONADO

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX19-00005-Q

ORDER

The Court is in receipt of appellant’s notice of appeal from the trial court’s order denying 

relief sought by his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. This is an accelerated 

appeal and is governed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 31.

We ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of appellant’s right to appeal and to 

file it with the clerk’s record.

We ORDER the D a l l a s County D i s t r i c t Clerk to file the clerk’s record by

November 20, 2019. We ORDER that the clerk’s record contain copies of the application for 

writ of habeas corpus, any response by the State, the trial court’s order disposing of the writ 

application, any other documents filed that relate to the writ application, and the trial court’s 

certification of appellant’s right to appeal. 

We ORDER the court reporter to file, by November 20, 2019, either the reporter’s record 

from the hearing on the writ application or written verification that no hearing was conducted.
–2–

Because appellant has filed an appeal from a habeas corpus proceeding challenging a 

conviction, we apply the same briefing rules, deadlines, and schedule that apply to direct appeals 

from criminal cases. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1(a). Thus, appellant’s brief shall be due thirty days 

after the record is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the

Honorable Tammy Kemp, Presiding Judge, 204th Judicial District Court; Kendra L. 

Thibodeaux, Official Court Reporter, 204th Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas

County District Clerk; and counsel for appellant and the State.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1784

In re: GARRY DAVID GALLARDO , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 5:17

- cv - 00106

- FPS

- J PM )

Submitted : October 19, 2018 Decided: November 1, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Garry David Gallardo, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Garry David Gallardo petitions for a w rit of mandamus, asking this court to compel the district court “to either award the writ of habeas corpus or issue an order to the respondent to show cause why the writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.”
Mandam us relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui , 333 F.3 d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). The party seeking issuance of the writ of mandamus bears the burden of showing that his right to the writ is clear and indisputable. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d at 517 (citations omitted). We conclude that Gallardo fails to make this showing. Accordingly, although we grant him leave to proceed in forma pauperi s, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Francis Mailhot, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of MILLENNIUM CAPITAL
VENTURE HOLDINGS, INC.(the "Issuer");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Issuer's fourth fiscal quarter
ending November 30, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the Issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Issuer's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.

By: /s/ Francis Mailhot
    -----------------------
    Francis Mailhot
    Chief Executive Officer

Dated: June 16, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of USIP.Com,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Craig  Burton,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

s/s Craig Burton
Craig Burton
President, USIP.Com, Inc.


Date: May 9, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #10852 and #10853] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 2. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of New York (FEMA-1692-DR), dated 04/24/2007. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Inland and Coastal Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         04/14/2007 through 04/18/2007.                     

*Effective Date:*                         05/09/2007.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/25/2007.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/24/2008.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road For, Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of New York , dated 04/24/2007 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Ulster. 

Contiguous Counties: New York, and Delaware.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E7-9489 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Company Name                                     
|Aboard Publishing, Inc.                          
|Bellingham Herald Publishing, LLC                
|Belton Publishing Company, Inc.                  
|Biscayne Bay Publishing, Inc.                    
|The Bradenton Herald, Inc.                       
|Cass County Publishing Company, Inc.             
|The Charlotte Observer Publishing Company        
|Columbia State, Inc.                             
|Columbus Ledger-Enquirer, Inc.                   
|Cypress Media, Inc.                              
|Cypress Media, LLC                               
|Dagren, Inc.                                     
|Double A Publishing, Inc.                        
|The Gables Publishing Company, Inc.              
|Gulf Publishing Company, Inc.                    
|HLB Newspapers, Inc.                             
|Idaho Statesman Publishing, LLC                  
|Keltatim Publishing Company, Inc.                
|Keynoter Publishing Company, Inc.                
|Knight Ridder News Services, Inc.                
|Knight Ridder Digital                            
|Knight-Ridder International, Inc.                
|Knight-Ridder Investment Company                 
|Knight-Ridder Leasing Company                    
|Knight-Ridder Newspaper Sales, Inc.              
|Knight Ridder Resources, Inc.                    
|Knight-Ridder Shared Services, Inc.              
|Knight Ridder Sales, Inc.                        
|KR Net Ventures, Inc.                            
|KR Newsprint Company                             
|KR U.S.A., Inc                                   
|KRI Property, Inc.                               
|Lees Summit Journal, Inc.                       
|LEXHL, Limited Partnership                       
|Lexington H-L Services, Inc.                     
|Lexington Press Inc.                             
|The Macon Telegraph Publishing Company           
|Mail Advertising Corporation                     
|McClatchy Newspapers, Inc.                       
|MediaStream, Inc.                                
|Miami Herald Holding Company, Inc.               
|Nittany Printing and Publishing Company          
|Nor-Tex Publishing, Inc.                         
|Olympian Publishing, LLC                         
|Pacific Northwest Publishing Company, Inc.       
|Quad County Publishing, Inc.                     
|Richwood, Inc.                                   
|Runways Pub., Inc.                               
|San Luis Obispo, LLC                             
|Star-Telegram Operating, Ltd.                    
|Sun Publishing Company, Inc.                     
|Tribune Newsprint Company                        
|Wichita Eagle and Beacon Publishing Company, Inc.
May 24, 1951

No. 55587.

Suit 4651.

#### Wm. J. Jones & Co. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1247 affirmed March 30, 1951. C. A. D. 453.
Before the Third Division,

September 18, 1943

No. 48789.

#### Protests 64843-K, etc., of Ignaz Strauss & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of coünsel certain of the trays composed wholly or in chief value of brass, copper (not brass), or pewter, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, used chiefly for utilitarian purposes on the table or in the household, were held dutiable as follows: (1) Those in chief value of brass, found to be similar to exhibits 1 to 6 in *Strauss*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), at 40 percent under paragraph 339; (2) those in chief value of brass, found to be similar to exhibit 7 in *Strauss*v. *United States, supra,*at 45 percent under paragraph 397; (3) those in chief value of copper (not brass), similar to exhibits 1 to 6 in *Strauss v. United States, supra,*at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 339, as modified by the United Kingdom Trade Agreement (T. D. 49753); and (4) those in chief value of pewter, similar to exhibit 8 in *Strauss*v. *United States, supra,*at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 339, as modified by the said trade agreement (T. D. 49753); plus in each instance the revenue tax wherever assessed. Protests sustained to this extent.
No. 42131.

#### Protests 610535-G, etc., of P. Pastene & Co., Inc. (New York).

*388Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > School and Early Employment Experience of Youth : A Report on Seven Communities, 1952-57

              																	Plunkett, Margaret L.					 and 	Riches, Naomi, 1895-. 						*School and Early Employment Experience of Youth : A Report on Seven Communities, 1952-57 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1277*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										April 1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4553,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
NO. 07-08-0080-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	AUGUST 5, 2008

	______________________________

	DANNY RAY BUSCH, JR., APPELLANT

	V.

	MARVIN MEINKE AND PATTI MEINKE, APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2005-597,542; HONORABLE PAULA LANEHART, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	On July 17, 2008, the parties filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.  By letter of July 18, 2008, this Court requested that the parties amend the motion in order to clarify the relief requested.  On July 25, 2008, Danny Ray Busch, Jr., filed Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal in which he represents that he and Appellees, Marvin Meinke and Patti Meinke, have compromised and settled their differences.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  Pursuant to the motion, the parties seek to have this appeal dismissed with the parties bearing their own costs.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).  We grant the motion.1 

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and costs are taxed against the party incurring them.  Having dismissed the appeal at Danny Ray Busch’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 12, 2014

No. 04-14-00285-CR

Jason Clay DOTSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR10439

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 We grant appellant’s motion for extension of time to respond to this court’s order dated 

August 21, 2014. We order appellant must file, by September 22, 2014, either proof that court 

reporter Herminia Torres has been paid to prepare the record or that appellant is entitled to the 

record without prepayment of the reporter’s fee. Appellant is advised that no further extensions 

of time to respond will be granted.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00020

- CR

B ERT G RIFFIN

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On A pp eal from the 367th District Court

of Denton County ( F16

- 2045

- 367 )

January 14, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial cour t’ s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach