alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### (Http://Www.dji.com/) Store (Http://Store.dji.com/) Products (Http://Www.dji.com/Products) DJI Events (Http://Event.dji.com) Support (Http://Www.dji.com/Support) Community Fly Safe (Http://Flysafe.dji.com) United States (English) 

### (/Select



# (http://www.dji.com/product/phantom) Overview (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom) Features (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom/Feature) Specs (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom/Spec) Videos (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom/Video) Downloads (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom/Download) FAQ (Http://Www.dji.com/Product/Phantom/Faq) Wiki (Http://Wiki.dji.com/En/Index.php/Phantom) 

### Size and Weight Search dji.com... 

# Page 1 of 3 Phantom 1 - Specs | DJI

7/ 10/2015 http://www.dji.com/product/phantom/spec

### Basic Parameters

ESC Sound Introduction

Charger & Battery Parameters

TX Parameters Operating Temperature -10°C ~ 50°C Power Consumption 3.12W Take-Off Weight <1200g Hovering Accuracy (GPS Mode) Vertical: 0.8m Horizontal: 2.5m Max Yaw Angular Velocity 200°/s Max Tilt Angle 45° Max Ascent / Descent Speed 6m/s Max Flight Velocity 10m/s Diagonal Distance (Motor Center To Motor Center) 350mm Phantom Prop Guard Weight(Single):18.7g Size(Single): Angle(155.0°) Radius(112.32mm) Whole Size with Four Prop Guards: 575.5mm Ready ♪1234567 Throttle Stick Is Not At Bottom BBBBBB... Input Signal Abnormal B——–B——–B... Input Voltage Abnormal BB—BB—BB—BB... Charger AC Input 100-240V Charge Current 1A/2A/3A Current Drain For Balancing 200mA Power 20W Battery Type LiPo Working Frequency 2.4GHz ISM Control Channels 7 Channels Communication Distance 1000m Receiver Sensitivity ( 1%PER ) > -100dBm Power Consumption Of TX < 20dBm Working Current /Voltage 52 mA@6V AA Battery 4 Required 

# Page 2of 3 Phantom 1 - Specs | DJI

7/ 10/2015 http://www.dji.com/product/phantom/specAbout DJI (http://www.dji.com/company) Contact DJI (http://www.dji.com/contact) News (http://www.dji.com/info) Media Coverage (http://www.dji.com/info/media-coverage) Showcase (http://www.dji.com/showcase) DJI University (http://edu.dji.com/) Careers (http://we.dji.com/en.html) DJI Wiki (http://wiki.dji.com/en) After-sales Service Policies (http://www.dji.com/service) Website Feedback (/support/website-feedback) DJI Developer (http://dev.dji.com) (http://www.dji.com/) Copyright © 2015 DJI All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy (http://www.dji.com/policy) Terms of Use (http://www.dji.co m/terms) 

# Page 3of 3 Phantom 1 - Specs | DJI

7/ 10/2015 http://www.dji.com/product/phantom/spec
No. 55606.

#### M. Cohen & Sons Shoe Co. *v.*United States,

protests 126301-K (S) and 133033-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
No. 54988.

#### De Meo Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 149869-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 9071)

#### Frederick H. Cone & Company, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 723841.

(Decided on rehearing [not published] February 11, 1958)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeal listed above has been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the price at which certain items of the subject merchandise were freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Western Germany, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, was the invoice unit value, and that such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find and hold the proper dutiable export value of the items of merchandise marked “A” and checked BS on the invoice to be the invoice unit value. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before the Third Division,

January 16, 1939

No. 40441.

#### Protest 944156-G of S. & G. Gump Co., Inc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

There was no, appearance on the part of the plaintiff when this case was called for trial. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
(Reap. Dec. 9463)

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 963513; 877999.

(Decided June 16, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*678Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official records discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2014223EN.01006602.xml

| 14.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/66

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 May 2014 — CI v Parliament

(Case F-130/12) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Remuneration - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Double dependent child allowance - Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations - Conditions for grant - Amicable settlement between the parties after the intervention of the European Ombudsman - Implementation - Duty of care))

2014/C 223/68

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CI (represented by: B. Cortese and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Despotopoulou and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision refusing to grant the double dependant child allowance under Article 67(3) of the Staff Regulations

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 5 December 2011 refusing to renew, with effect from 1 June 2008, the double dependent child allowance, and the decision of 20 July 2012 rejecting the claim; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 5 December 2011 refusing to renew, with effect from 1 June 2008, the double dependent child allowance, and the decision of 20 July 2012 rejecting the claim;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CI. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CI.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013, p. 29.

1

---
# C_2012194EN.01002602.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/26

---

Action brought on 8 May 2012 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Holsten-Brauerei (H)

(Case T-193/12)

2012/C 194/44

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Holsten-Brauerei AG (Hamburg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 February 2012 in Case R 2340/2010-1 on the basis of incompatibility with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community Trade Mark, in so far as it upheld the opposition against the extension of protection of international registration No 984 017; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 February 2012 in Case R 2340/2010-1 on the basis of incompatibility with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community Trade Mark, in so far as it upheld the opposition against the extension of protection of international registration No 984 017;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs of the appeal procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs of the appeal procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the international registration which has effect in the European Union of a figurative mark representing an escutcheon with the letter ‘H’ for goods in Class 32 — No 984 017

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Holsten-Brauerei AG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German figurative mark representing a knight on horseback with a shield bearing the letter ‘H’ for goods in Class 32

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
### Water powers of the Cascade Range, Part I, Southern Washington

By: J.C. Stevens

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp253

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 14**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 47687.

#### Protests 87377-K, etc., of Tara Singh et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of mufflers the same as those involved in Abstract 45938, the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 was sustained.
Case No. 9,333.

#### MAY v. HARPER et al.

[4 N. B. R. 478 (Quarto. 156); 118 Pittsb. Leg. J. 105; 2 Leg. Gaz. 381; 4 Brewst. 253.]

Circuit Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

1871.

Bankruptcy — Petition— Deposition — Amekd-mext Thereto.

The deposition of a witness to acts of bankruptcy in an involuntary proceeding cannot be amended, because it is the prooof upon which the rule to show cause issues, and without which the whole proceeding is defective.

[Cited in Re Hanibel, Case No. 6,023.]

.[Action by May against W. L. Harper & Atherton.] This was a hearing sur motion to dismiss creditors’ petition.

1

 [Reprinted from 4 N. B. R. 478 (Quarto, 150], by permission.]

McCÁNDLESS, District Judge.

A jury being called, and before they were sworn, attorney for creditors asks and has leave to amend the petition which is allowed because the creditors’ petition is a part of the pleadings in the case. He further asks leave to amend the deposition of the witness as to the acts of bankruptcy, which is refused, because it is the proof upon which the rule to show cause why he should not be declared a bankrupt issues, and without which the whole proceeding is defective. This deposition of W. L. Harper proves no act of bankruptcy, and the proceedings are dismissed at'the cost of the petitioning creditor.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 105]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3017]]

Public Law 111-105
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, as the ``Conrad DeRouen, Jr. 
         Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2009 -  [H.R. 2972]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONRAD DEROUEN, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 115 West Edward Street in Erath, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Conrad DeRouen, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Conrad 
DeRouen, Jr. Post Office''.

    Approved November 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2972:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            July 21, 22, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### CHURCHILL COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; City of Fallon, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bruce BABBITT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; William Bettenberg, in his official capacity as Assistant Director, Office of Policy Analysis, Department of Interior; Jeffery Zippin, in his official capacity as Team Leader,Truckee-Carson Coordination Office, Department of Interior; Ronald Anglin, in his official capacity as Refuge Manager; Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge, Department of Interior; Marvin Plenert, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Services; John Doebel, in his official capacity as Assistant Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Services; Ann Ball, in her official capacity as Project Manager of Bureau of Reclamation Lahontan Basin Project Office, Defendants-Appellees, and Sierra Pacific Power Company, Intervenor. CHURCHILL COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada; City of Fallon, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Sierra Pacific Power Company, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Bruce BABBITT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Defendant.

Nos. 97-15508, 97-15813.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 29, 1998.

*492The opinion filed July 15, 1998 [150 F.3d 1072], is hereby amended.

On page 7499 of the slip opinion [150 F.3d at 1079], the last sentence in paragraph 6 is amended by deleting the words “in the absence of a PEIS examining their combined effects”.

The partial paragraph at the top of page 7501 [150 F.3d at 1080] is amended by deleting the words “caused by the FWS’s failure to prepare a PEIS,”.

The first full paragraph at the top of page 7502 [150 F.3d at 1080] is amended by deleting the words “prior to producing a PEIS”.

At the end of the partial paragraph at the top of page 7492 [150 F.3d at 1076, end of first paragraph^ footnote should be added to read as follows:

> “On this appeal we address only the standing of the local governments and the intervention of right of the local power utility. We make no judgment concerning the merits of this action.”

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing.

So ordered.
No. 74-5753.

#### Slaughter et al. *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
# C_2012343EN.01002401.xml

| 10.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/24

---

Action brought on 17 September 2012 — ZZ v Council

(Case F-98/12)

2012/C 343/41

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions not to promote the applicant to Grade AD12 for the 2008 and 2009 promotion exercises.

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | annul the decisions of the Appointing Authority not to promote the applicant to Grade AD12 for the 2008 and 2009 promotion exercises; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions of the Appointing Authority not to promote the applicant to Grade AD12 for the 2008 and 2009 promotion exercises;

| — | so far as necessary, annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 6 June 2012 rejecting the applicant’s complaint directed against his non-promotion to AD12 for the 2008 and 2009 promotion exercises; |
| --- | --- |

—

so far as necessary, annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 6 June 2012 rejecting the applicant’s complaint directed against his non-promotion to AD12 for the 2008 and 2009 promotion exercises;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

---
# C_2014253EN.01006701.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/67

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 19 June 2014 — BN v Parliament

(Case F-24/12) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Action for annulment - Official of grade AD 14 occupying a post as Head of Unit - Allegation of psychological harassment against the Director-General - Mobility exercise - Refusal to accept appointment to a post of Advisor in another Directorate-General with the loss of the salary increase for Heads of Unit - Decision on a temporary transfer to another Advisor post - Interest of the service - Principle that the post to which an official is assigned should correspond to his grade - Action for compensation - Harm arising from non-decision-making conduct))

2014/C 253/93

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BN (represented initially by: S. Rodrigues, A. Tymen and A. Blot, and subsequently by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and J.F. de Wachter, and subsequently by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and V. Montebello-Demogeot)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision adopted by the President of the European Parliament reassigning the applicant within the same Directorate-General of the Parliament from the post of Head of Unit to a post of Advisor to the Director of a Directorate and the claim for compensation for psychological harassment.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Parliament to bear all of its own costs and to pay all the costs incurred by BN. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Parliament to bear all of its own costs and to pay all the costs incurred by BN.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 36.

1

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Nutra Pharma Corp., (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rik
Deitsch, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
      November 18, 2009/s/
      Rik J. DeitschRik
      J. DeitschChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer