alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

GENENTECH, INC., INTERMUNE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

SANDOZ INC., LEK PHARMACEUTICALS, D.D.,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2022-1595

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:19-cv-00078-RGA, Judge 

Richard G. Andrews.

-------------------------------------------------

GENENTECH, INC., INTERMUNE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

SANDOZ INC., LEK PHARMACEUTICALS, D.D.,

Defendants-Appellants

______________________

2022-1714

______________________

Case: 22-1595 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 06/16/2022
2 GENENTECH, INC. v. SANDOZ INC.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:19-cv-00078-RGA, Judge 

Richard G. Andrews.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to voluntarily dismiss Appeal No. 2022-1714,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. Appeal No. 2022-1714 is 

dismissed. The revised official caption for the remaining 

appeal, Appeal No. 2022-1595, is reflected above.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in Appeal No. 

2022-1714.

(3) The Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of this order to the merits panel assigned to Appeal No. 2022-1595.

(4) Genentech, Inc. and InterMune, Inc.’s reply brief in

Appeal No. 2022-1595 is due no later than July 5, 2022.

June 16, 2022

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2022-1714 only): 

June 16, 2022

Case: 22-1595 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 06/16/2022
# C_2016098EN.01002702.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2016 — Slovenia v Commission

(Case T-507/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Manufacture of leisure equipment - Restructuring aid - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Obligation to state reasons - Whether imputable to the State - Private investor test))

(2016/C 098/35)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: V. Klemenc and A. Grum, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, T. Maxian Rusche, M. Kocjan and B. Rous Demiri, acting as Agents, assisted initially by M. Ulčar and M. Ménard, and subsequently by M. Ménard, P. Božičko and A. Krošel, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2014/273/EU of 19 September 2012 on the measures SA.26379 (C 13/10) (ex NN 17/10) implemented by Slovenia in favour of Elan d.o.o. (OJ 2014 L 144, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Slovenia to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.

1

---
# C_2017104EN.01004602.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types)

(Case T-516/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark Limbic® Types - Lack of distinctive character - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 104/65)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2015 (Case R 1974/2014-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Limbic® Types as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 June 2015 (Case R 1974/2014-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 June 2015 (Case R 1974/2014-1);

| 2. | Orders that EUIPO shall bear its own costs as well as those incurred by Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders that EUIPO shall bear its own costs as well as those incurred by Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG.

---

(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27814-27815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 11, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Umphrey II Family Limited Partnership and Hillister Enterprises 
II, Inc., Beaumont, Texas; to become bank holding companies by 
acquiring 19.61 percent of the voting shares of CBFH, Inc., Beaumont, 
Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of County 
Bancshares, Inc., Newton,

[[Page 27815]]

Texas; Newton Delaware Financial Corporation, Dover, Delaware; and 
CountyBank, National Association, Newton, Texas.
    In connection with this application, CBFH, Inc., Beaumont, Texas, 
also has applied to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 
percent of the voting shares of County Bancshares, Inc., Newton, Texas, 
and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Newton Delaware 
Financial Corporation, Dover, Delaware, and CountyBank, National 
Association, Newton, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 11, 2007.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-9441 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
No. 48207.

#### Protest 67162-K of Absorbo Beer Pad Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

At the trial the president of the plaintiff company, Benjamin Goldstein, testified as to the process of manufacture, that he was in court when a witness (Leo Weiss) testified in the case of the *Absorbo Beer Pad Co.*v. *United States*(30 C. C. P. A. 24, C. A. D. 209) as to the process of manufacture of the pulpboard in that case, and that the process of manufacture he himself had observed in the Osthushenrich-Werke, A. G., was substantially similar in all respects to that in the Absorbo Beer Pad case, *supra.*The record in that case (Suit 4379) was incorporated herein. A sample of the merchandise in the case at bar was received in evidence as exhibit 1, and this witness testified that it was purchased from Osthushenrich-Werke, A. G., located at Glashuette, Saxony, Germany. Upon the whole testimony the court was satisfied that the merchandise at bar was manufactured in the manner described by Mr. Goldstein and by the witness Weiss in said prior case, by the use of wire screens on the machines during process of manufacture, the court stating that irrespective of how the pinprick markings may have been made, the pulpboard did not “rise to the dignity of” embossed goods, and “is not decorated or ornamented within the meaning of the terms employed by Congress.” As it was fairly established in the present case that the pulpboard under consideration is the same in all material respects, as well as in its appearance and method of manufacture, as that the subject of said Suit 4379, it'was held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1402 as claimed.

Lawrence, J., did not participate in this decision.
No. 46464.

#### Petition 6110-R of L. Bamberger & Co. (New York).

^Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

From an examination of the record and a consideration of the facts the court was satisfied that the entry was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States, to conceal or misrepresent the facts, or to deceive the appraiser as to the true value of the merchandise. The petition 'was therefore granted.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA partners with small business for innovation

By DLA Public AffairsDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              
Small businesses are a critical component of the Defense Logistics Agency’s industrial base and is essential to the agency’s ability to provide resilient and secure support to warfighters.

Watch here to learn more about how the agency partners with industry. Potential suppliers can also visit www.dla.mil/SmallBusiness/.

                                                                                              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

partnering with industrySmall Businessindustrial base
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Voice Pick Technology Pilot Program Goes Live at DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California

By Annette Silva, DLA Distribution San Joaquin Public Affairs

                SAN JOAQUIN, Calif.  –              DLA Strategic Plan 2018-2022Warfighter First; Objective 1.4 Predictive TechnologyDLA DistributionDLA Distribution San Joaquin

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA Distribution San JoaquinDistributionVoice Pick
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Central Ohio small businesses gain millions

DLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              

## Central Ohio small businesses gain millions

View high res image

The Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime announced that more than $120 million in government contracting dollars have been awarded to Ohio small businesses since the beginning of the fiscal year. Third quarter numbers released today reflect an increase of more than $40 million from the first half of the fiscal year. Nearly $37 million in award dollars have gone to small businesses in the Columbus region – an increase of more than $7 million in the third quarter. The Columbus Metropolitan Region encompasses the following counties according to the Columbus Chamber of Commerce: Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Logan, Licking, Madison, Marion, Morrow, Pickaway and Union. 

View high res image

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Small Business L&MDLA L&M
No. 96-7917.

#### Licciardi *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Michael J. Glanzer et al., Respondents, v Michael Altman et al., Appellants.

[699 NYS2d 386]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered on or about March 30, 1999, which, in an action by plaintiff sellers to recover a down payment on the sale of a cooperative apartment held in escrow by defendant buyers’ attorney, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ preanswer motion for summary judgment was properly entertained by the IAS Court without giving CPLR 3212 notice, the parties’ submissions clearly indicating that the case involved only a question of law fully appreciated and briefed on the motion *(see, Mihlovan v Grozavu,*72 NY2d 506, 508), namely, whether the contract provision requiring defendants to submit their application for Board approval within 10 days of contract execution was untenable. This issue was properly decided in favor of plaintiffs, the plain terms of the contract requiring a timely submission of the Board package regardless of whether defendants had previously obtained a commitment letter or gained access to the cooperative’s documents. A different interpretation of defendants’ obligation in this respect is not required by the fact that the contract did not make time of the essence. Defendants’ failure to submit the Board package within the allotted 10 days was a breach of contract entitling plaintiffs to the liquidated damages stipulated in the contract for a breach by defendants. Also constituting a material breach, as the IAS Court held, was defendants’ misrepresentation of their bankruptcy status. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.
PHANTOM 3 STANDARD Release Note

© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved.

2015.9.7 

Overview: 

1. All-in-One firmware version updated to:v1.1.0030

2. DJI GO app iOS version updated to: v2.2.0

3. DJI GO app Android version updated to: v2.1.0

What’s New: 

1. Added Intelligent Navigation Modes including Point of Interest, Follow Me and Waypoint. 

Bug Fixes: 

1. Wi-Fi extender failed to respond during the linking process. 

2. Users could not reset the Wi-Fi extender password from the DJI GO app.

3. Users could not initiate the linking process from the DJI GO app.

4. Users could not customize the control stick modes in the DJI GO app
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CapLease, Inc. (the “Company”)
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul H. McDowell, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ PAUL H. McDOWELLPaul
      H. McDowellChief
      Executive OfficerMarch
      6, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CapLease, Inc. and will be retained by
CapLease, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        9197
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              9197
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         5748
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     13054
<OTHER-SE>                                   (9605)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  9197
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            105362
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (105362)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>