alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 96-1264.

#### Hough *v.*Runyon, Postmaster General.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 74-5959.

#### Hill *v.*California Adult Authority Parole Board.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1210

CHALEDEEANNKA DOCUMENT PREPARER GOYENS; O’LEVIA GOYENS; MALCOLM GOYENS; FREDDIE GOYENS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-99-196-4-H) Submitted: November 14, 2000 Decided: November 22, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chaledeeannka Document Preparer Goyens, Appellant Pro Se. Claud Robert Whitener, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Chaledeeannka Goyens appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Goyens v. North Carolina Dep’t of Health & Human Res. , No. CA-99-196-4-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2000). We deny the parties’ motions to expedite theappeal, and we deny Goyens’ “motion for release pending of records.” We deny Goyens’ motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 74-5778.

#### Gocke *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Julianne M. Biagini, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Endwave Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: November 14, 2005 /s/ JULIANNE M. BIAGINI     Julianne M. Biagini    Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 01, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 01, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0225. TERRANCE NORRIS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

M20150012
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 10123 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Jesus Sidon,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16 - CR - 122 - 6

**_________________________ _____**  Before **Willett, Duncan,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Jesus Sidon, federal prisoner # 54164 - 177, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). He argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion because his blindness constitutes an extraor dinary and compelling circumstance warranting release. Sidon further argues that he

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 4, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10123 Document: 00516846513 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/04/2023No. 23 - 10123

2 was denied acce ss to courts due to the district court’s failure to appoint counsel. The district court determined that the nature and circumstances of the offense, the history and characteristics of Sidon, and the seriousness of the offense did not warrant a further reduction to Sidon’s sentence than the one granted at his original sentencing hearing due to his eye condition. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), (a)(2). Sidon’s failure to challenge these findings defeats his claim. See United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020) ; Y ohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224 - 25 (5th Cir. 1993) ; Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) . As such, we need not consider his contention that extraordinary and compelling reasons justify relief. See Ward v. United States , 11 F.4th 354, 360 - 62 (5th Cir. 2021) . Sidon did no t move for the appointment of counsel in the district court. Thus, he fails to demonstrate that the district court denied him access to courts or abu sed its discretion in denying his compassionate release motion. See Chambliss , 948 F.3d at 693. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED** . Case: 23-10123 Document: 00516846513 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/04/2023
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 733rd LRS Fuels Flight best in ACC

By Tech Sgt Robert Hicks633rd Air Base Wing Public Affairs

                JOINT BASE LANGLEY-EUSTIS, Va.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Joint Base Langley-Eustis website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

733rd Logistics Readiness SquadronLangley Air Force BaseDrake Awardair combat commandfuelfuel transactions
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Service Members Build Tent Systems for Yutu Survivors

By Staff Sgt. James Kennedy Benjamin

                SAIPAN, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands  –              *(USINDOPACOM Note: Pacific Air Forces Public Affairs made edits to this article.)**Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Super Typhoon Yutudisaster reliefHumanitarian Assistancetentsfederal emergency management agencyFEMATemporary Emergency Tent and Roofing Installation Support797th Engineer Company
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 This is notice that on March 7, 2007, Penick Corporation, 33 Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug
ScheduleCoca Leaves (9040)
IIRaw Opium (9600)
IIPoppy Straw (9650)
IIConcentrate of Poppy Straw (9670)
II
 The company plans to import the listed controlled substances to manufacture bulk controlled substance intermediates for sale to its customers. As noted in a previous notice published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745), all applicants for registration to import a basic class of any controlled substances in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) are satisfied. Dated: May 10, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E7-9645 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Barr Shipping Co. *v.*United States

No. 7656.

Invoice dated London, England, May 9, 1946.

Certified May 15, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 23, 1946.

Entry No. 18650.

(Decided February 2, 1949)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley 8. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Charles J. Miville,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as .that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. •

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1672 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that persons who enter 

into a conspiracy within the United States to traffic illegal controlled 

substances outside the United States, or engage in conduct within the 

United States to aid or abet drug trafficking outside the United States, 

may be criminally prosecuted in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2011 

Mr. CONRAD (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify that 

persons who enter into a conspiracy within the United 

States to traffic illegal controlled substances outside the 

United States, or engage in conduct within the United 

States to aid or abet drug trafficking outside the United 

States, may be criminally prosecuted in the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1672 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Trafficking Safe 

3 Harbor Elimination Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES 

5 ACT TO CLARIFY CONSPIRACIES CONDUCTED 

6 WITHIN THE UNITED STATES MAY BE CRIMI7 NALLY PROSECUTED IN THE UNITED STATES. 

8 Section 406 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

9 U.S.C. 846) is amended by— 

10 (1) inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Any’’; and 

11 (2) inserting at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b)(1) There is jurisdiction of conduct described in 

13 paragraph (2) and any person within the United States 

14 that commits such conduct shall be subject to the same 

15 penalties that would apply to the activities described in 

16 paragraph (2) if the activities were to occur in the United 

17 States. 

18 ‘‘(2) Conduct described in this paragraph is conduct 

19 in which a person within the United States conspires with, 

20 or aids or abets, 1 or more persons, without regard to 

21 where such other persons are located, to engage in activi22 ties at any place outside the United States that would con23 stitute a violation of this title (except for a violation of 

24 section 404) if committed within the United States.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1491 

To amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to expand 

the electric rate-setting authority of States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2011 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 

to expand the electric rate-setting authority of States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PURPA’s Legislative 

5 Upgrade to State Authority Act’’ or ‘‘PURPA PLUS 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

8 Congress finds that— 

9 (1) section 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory 

10 Policies Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 824a–3)— 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1491 IS

1 (A) established a new class of nonutility 

2 generators known as ‘‘qualifying cogeneration 

3 facilities’’ and ‘‘qualifying small power produc4 tion facilities’’; and 

5 (B) encouraged the development of alter6 nate sources of energy with the requirement 

7 that utilities purchase energy offered by quali8 fying facilities; 

9 (2) since the date of enactment of that section, 

10 materials and designs for qualifying facility tech11 nologies have advanced and placed renewable re12 sources and cogeneration facilities within the reach 

13 of more consumers, including technologies such as— 

14 (A) solar photovoltaic panels; 

15 (B) small wind turbines; 

16 (C) storage technologies to support renew17 able energy; 

18 (D) small hydroelectric generators on exist19 ing dams, diversions, and conduits; 

20 (E) hydrokinetic generators; 

21 (F) gas microturbines; 

22 (G) steam-cycle turbines; 

23 (H) Stirling engines; 

24 (I) fuel cells; and 

25 (J) biomass boilers; 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1491 IS

1 (3) States need additional regulatory flexibility 

2 and authority to be able to incentivize the qualifying 

3 facilities; and 

4 (4) the avoided cost caps on qualifying facilities 

5 should be removed so that States can set the rates 

6 for qualifying facilities of not more than 2 

7 megawatts capacity. 

8 SEC. 3. STATE AUTHORITY TO INCENTIVIZE QUALIFYING 

9 FACILITIES. 

10 Section 210(b) of the Public Utility Regulatory Poli11 cies Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 824a–3(b)) is amended in 

12 the last sentence by inserting before the period at the end 

13 the following: ‘‘, except that the rule shall provide that 

14 a State regulatory authority or nonregulated electric util15 ity, acting under State authority, may set rates that ex16 ceed the incremental cost of alternative electric energy for 

17 purchases from any qualifying cogeneration facility or 

18 qualifying small power production facility of not more 

19 than 2 megawatts capacity’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2  UNIVERSAL
COMPRESSION, INC. CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Transition Report of
Universal Compression, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the transition
period ending December 31, 2005 (the Report), I, Stephen A. Snider, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ STEPHEN A. SNIDERStephen A. SniderChief Executive OfficerMarch 3, 2006    In connection with the Transition Report of
Universal Compression, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the transition
period ending December 31, 2005 (the Report), I, J. Michael Anderson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ J. MICHAEL ANDERSONJ. Michael AndersonChief Financial OfficerMarch 3, 2006