alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9051)

#### Irving Ross, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 5609.

(Decided January 16, 1958)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OlivbR, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain dart games exported from Glasgow, Scotland, and entered at the port of Los Angeles, Calif.'

Stipulated facts, upon which the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, represented by the invoice items marked with the initials “NR” by Examiner Norman F. Roth, to which this appeal is limited, is foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value for these items is the “entered unit values less *2%*percent, plus packing marked ‘X,’ ” and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2014184EN.01002802.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/28

---

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — Interbev v Commission

(Case T-18/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Measures taken by Interbev - Financing by voluntary contributions made mandatory - Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market - Withdrawal of the decision - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 184/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Association nationale interprofessionnelle du bétail et des viandes (Interbev) (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Morrier and A. Bouviala, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, then B. Stromsky, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/131/EU of 13 July 2011 on levies for Interbev (OJ 2012 L 59, p. 14).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 17.3.2012.

1

---
#### Carl Fischer Musical Instrument Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7845.

Entry No. 55241.

(Decided June 20, 1950)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision on the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject, to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers for home consumption in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatsoever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States at the per se values found by the Appraiser plus 20 per cent, less 30 per cent discount, plus 9 per cent tax, plus 1.01 per cent tax plus packing as invoiced.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher export value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of tbe Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise bere involved, and that sucb values were tbe *per se*values found by tbe appraiser plus 20 per centum, less 30 per céntima discount, plus 9 per centum tax, plus 1.01 per centum tax, plus packing as invoiced.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
English Translation of Lease Agreement



 Exhibit 10.33 
 English Translation 
 Lease Agreement 
 Party A: Zhejiang Yuhuan Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to “Party A”) 
 Party B: Zhejiang Yuhui
Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to “Party B”) 
 1. Party A shall lease 24 sets of self-owned apartments located in Small Town Stories
in Weitang Town, Jiashan County to Party B from April 2007. 
 2. The rental of each apartment shall be RMB1,500 per month through negotiation by both
parties. 
 3. Party A shall provide Party B with invoice issued by Jiashan Local Tax Bureau against receipt of rental from Party B . 
 4. Any disputes arising from the performance of the agreement shall be settled through negotiation by both parties. 
  

			
	Party A: Zhejiang Yuhuan Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (Seal)	 	Party B: Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (Seal)
		
	October 5, 2007	 	October 5, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [F-40308; AK-964-1410-KC-P] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance. 

# SUMMARY:

As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving the surface and subsurface estates in certain lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to Bering Straits Native Corporation. The lands are in the vicinity of Mary's Igloo, Alaska, and are located in:

**Kateel River Meridian, Alaska**

T. 5 S., R. 30 W., 

Sec. 13, lots 1 and 2; 

Tracts V thru Z, inclusive; 

Tracts AA, BB, and CC.

Containing 453.52 acres.

Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Nome Nugget. 

# DATES:

The time limits for filing an appeal are: 

1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision shall have until June 21, to file an appeal. 

2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal. 

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights. 

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:

                        The Bureau of Land Management by phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at                         *ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov.*                         Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.                     

D. Kay Erben, 

Land Law Examiner, Branch of Adjudication II.

[FR Doc. E7-9790 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
No. 96-5972.

#### Young *v.*Lowe.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
iCom
     Network

March  8,  1999

To:

From:

Re:  Memo  of  UnderstandingBInternet  Kiosks

This Memo of Understanding (hereinafter "MOU") is between (company) (hereinafter
"Contract  Vendor")  and  iCom  Network, Inc. (hereinafter "iCom") regarding the
service  and  maintenance  of  iCom's  installed  Internet  Kiosks.

1.)     Icom  owns  and  operates public internet Kiosks under the brand name of
NetSiteJ  and/or  NetZoneJ  throughout  the  U.S.  which  requires  service  and
maintenance.

2.)     Contract  Vendor  agrees  to service, collect monies from, repair, clean
and  otherwise  perform  general  maintenance  in Contract Vendor's territory to
Internet  Kiosks so designated by iCom in a timely and professional manner using
qualified  and  experienced  technicians.  Contract  Vendor  must  maintain  a
reasonable  quality  of  service acceptable to iCom based on industry standards.

3.)     Contract  Vendor agrees to review online Internet Kiosk reports provided
by iCom to determine daily status of kiosks and perform any repair service calls
needed  within  24  hours.

4.)     Contract Bendor agrees to perform a miimum of (1) service call per month
per  kiosk  to  change dollar bill boxes and perform general cleaning functions.

5.)     Contract  Bendor  agrees  to properly label and send via Federal Express
using iCom's account number on a weekly basis all dollar bill boxes removed from
kiosks.  Contract  Vendor  understands the contents of the dollar bill boxes are
not  t  be  removed  and/or  tampered  with  in  any  form.

6.)     Icom agrees to pay Contract Vendor a fee of (fees) revenue per kiosk per
month  for  services  performed.  Contract  Vendor  must provide iCom an invoice
every  month  for  services  rendered.

7.)     Icom  agrees  to  provide  Contract Vendor all necessary parts needed to
perform  service  and  repair  functions  on  kiosks.

8.)     Each  party  shall  have  the right to terminate this MOU immediately by
written  notice  to the other if the party has materilly breached any obligation
herein.


<PAGE>
Both  parties  have  reviewed  this  MOU and agree to abide by all requirements.


/s/  Eric  Wagner
Eric  Wagner

iCom  Network,  Inc.
10225  Barnes  Canyon  Rd  Suite  A-111
San  Diego,  CA  92121
**Exhibit23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-114145 and333-121937 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-37648, 333-55260,333-67784, 333-69504, 333-99473 and 333-120108 on Form 3-8 of our reports datedMarch 1, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedules of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) (such reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relatingto Holdings change in its method of accounting for stock-based compensation)and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of UniversalCompression Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
| Houston, Texas                |
| March 1, 2007                 |

 

----
No. 43214.

#### Protest 892331-G of M. Zwiebel, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of squawker balloons composed wholly or in part of bamboo. On the authority of Abstract 40493 the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

January 27, 1941

No. 45301.

#### Protest 963550-G of G. H. Lewis & Sons, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the pheasants bore no marking but the cases in which they were packed were marked “Manchukuo” while the customs officers required them to be marked “Manchuria.” As the collector followed the directions in T. D. 47068 the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Mead, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 24, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/    JAMES E.
MEAD                 
|James E. Mead Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SUSAN BUDD
, Appellant,

v.

BRUCE G. BUDD
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 1300

[ July 6, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Nicholas R. Lopane , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE14

- 005445(33)

.

Robin Bresky and Jonathan Mann of the Law Offices of Robin Bresky, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Terrence P. O'Connor of Morgan, Carratt & O'Connor, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

C IK LIN
, K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., and M ETZGER

, E LIZABETH A., Associate Judge,

concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 50755.

#### Protest 118959-K of Brauner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

An examination of the official papers disclosing no reason for disturbing the action of the collector, the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Ulrich  Glaeser,  certify,  PURSUANT  TO  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual
report  of  Proteo,  Inc.  And  Subsidiaries  on  form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly  presents  in all material respects the
financial  condition and results of operations of Proteo, Inc. And Subsidiaries.



Date:  April  14,  2004                            By:  /s/  Ulrich  Glaeser
                                                    -----------------------
                                                Ulrich  Glaeser
                                                Principal  Financial  Officer


A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  typed  from  within  the  electronic  version of this written statement
required  by Section 906, has been provided to Proteo, Inc. And Subsidiaries and
will  be  retained  by  Proteo,  Inc.  And  Subsidiaries  and  furnished  to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9717]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meetings of Humanities Panels will be held at the Old Post 
Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather C. Gottry, Acting Advisory 
Committee Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, 
Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained 
by contacting the Endowment's TDD terminal on (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meetings are for the purpose of 
panel review, discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications 
for financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including discussion of 
information given in confidence to the agency by the grant applicants. 
Because the proposed meetings will consider information that is likely 
to disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial information 
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential and/or 
information of a personal nature the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, pursuant 
to authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to 
Close Advisory Committee meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have 
determined that these meetings will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsections (c) (4), and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States 
Code.
    1. Date: June 1, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Room: 415.
    Program: This meeting will review applications for The IMLS/NEH 
Digital Partnership Advancing Knowledge I, submitted to the Division of 
Preservation and Access, at the March 27, 2007 deadline.
    2. Date: June 12, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Room: 415.
    Program: This meeting will review applications for The IMLS/NEH 
Digital Partnership Advancing Knowledge II, submitted to the Division 
of Preservation and Access, at the March 27, 2007 deadline.

Heather C. Gottry,
Acting Advisory Committee, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-9717 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1


                             SMARTIRE SYSTEMS INC.
                         COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE

The Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United
States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP").

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                       Year Ended          Year Ended
                                                    July 31, 2002       July 31, 2001
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($000's except per share data)
<S>                                                    <C>                 <C>
Net income (loss) in accordance with GAAP              $   (6,829)         $    5,507
                                                       ==========          ==========

Weighted average number of common shares               16,743,977          14,296,240
                                                       ==========          ==========

Diluted weighted average number of shares              16,743,977          14,296,240
                                                       ==========          ==========

Basic and diluted income (loss) in accordance with
United States GAAP                                     $    (0.41)         $    (0.39)
                                                       ==========          ==========
</Table>
No. 47042.

#### Protests 72919-K, etc., of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Strauss-Eckardt*v. *United States*(T. D. 48272) the manger sets in question were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1403 as claimed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm 

Answerthink,Inc. 

Miami, Florida 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69951, 333-90635, and 333-39460), and in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87749 and 333-32342) of Answerthink, Inc. of our reportdated March 14, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Answerthink, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Miami, Florida 

March 14, 2006
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Earnest DAVIS.

No. 98-KH-1096.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Davis, Earnest;—Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 274-353.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he filed on or about October 18, 1996. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to *61consider and act on the application. If reíator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, filed, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/environmentalhealth/cdc-tracking-network.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/environmentalhealth/cdc-tracking-network.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.