alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015346EN.01001501.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2015 — United Kingdom v Commission

(Case T-503/12) (1)

1

((EAGGF - Guarantee Section - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Single payment scheme - Key controls - Ancillary controls))

(2015/C 346/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by C. Murrell, and subsequently by E. Jenkinson and M. Holt, and finally by M. Holt, acting as Agents, and by D. Wyatt QC, and V. Wakefield, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Donnelly, P. Rossi and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2012/500/EU of 6 September 2012 on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2012 L 244, p. 11), as regards four entries in the Annex to the decision relating to a 5 % flat-rate correction applied to expenditure incurred in Northern Ireland (United Kingdom) in the financial years 2008, amounting to EUR 277 231,60 and EUR 13 671 588,90, and 2009, amounting to EUR 270 398,26 and EUR 15 844 193,29.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
# C_2012109EN.01003002.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/30

---

Action brought on 17 February 2012 — GRE v OHIM — Villiger Söhne (LIBERTE brunes)

(Case T-78/12)

2012/C 109/61

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (Kloster Lehnin, Germany) (represented by: I. Memmler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Villiger Söhne GmbH (Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 December 2011 in Case No R 2109/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 December 2011 in Case No R 2109/2010-1;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘LIBERTE brunes’ for goods in Classes 25, 30 and 34 (application No 6 462 171)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Villiger Söhne GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘LA LIBERTAD’ (Community trade mark No 1 456 664) and the figurative mark ‘La LIBERTAD’ (Community trade mark No 2 433 126) for goods in Classes 14 and 34

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 39157.

#### Protests 937555-G, etc., of American Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the records presented the protests were overruled.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT Sep. 12, 2012 Report Request ID: 1018495 Report Code: AMP430

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:KHO

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 06 007 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS
PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration CRITERIA 88101

SELECTED OPTIONS OZONE EVALUATION AGENCY ROLE MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value SEASONAL-HOURLY REPORTING YES SORT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Order Column

EPA_REGION STATE_CODE MONITOR_TYPE COUNTY_CODE SITE_ID PARAMETER_CODE POC GLOBAL DATES 2012 Start Date End Date 2012 01 12 Tribal CodeSep. 12, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 1 of 3 MONITORS NOT REPORTINGSep. 12, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 2 of 3 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

California MONITOR TYPE: California Air Resources Board SLAMS JAN. 01, 2012 DEC. 31, 2012

THRU SITE ID CITY ADDRESS PARAMETER POCDURATION METHOD ------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------- NUMBER / PERCENT 06-007-0002 06-007-0008 88101

88101PM2.5 - Local Conditions

PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 1 7 7 Chico Chico 468 MANZANITA AVE, CHICO 984 East Avenue, CHICO 117 117 5

100% 5

100% 5 100% 5

1 100% 100% 5

4 100% 80% 5

5 100% 100% 30 10 49% 24% MONITORS REPORTING

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR STATE: REP ORG:Sep. 12, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 3 of 3 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

California MONITOR TYPE:

California Air Resources Board SLAMS JAN. 01, 2012 DEC. 31, 2012

THRU
PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS 88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions 2 0 0 36.5% 2 0 0 36.5% 2 0 0 36.5% 2 0 0 36.5% 2 0 0 36.5% 2 0 0 36.5% California Air Resources Board California REGION SUMMARY:(09) SAN FRANCISCO REPORT SUMMARY: MT SUMMARY:SLAMS REPORT SUMMARY STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY:
No. 48210.

Suits 4395/4400.

#### *Jacksonville Paper Co.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 615 affirmed March 1, 1943. C. A. D. 228.
June 1, 1950

No. 54362.

#### The Emporium Capwell Co. *v.*United States,

protest 128167-K.

Abstract 54164. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
# C_2013026EN.01007603.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/76

---

Action brought on 16 November 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-141/12)

2013/C 26/160

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of EPSO not to include the applicant in the list of persons who have passed the tests at the end of the training programme which is part of the certification procedure and a claim for damages.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the action admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the action admissible and well-founded;

| — | annul the contested measure; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested measure;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 10 000 as compensation for the damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 10 000 as compensation for the damage suffered;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002.

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry J. Boucher,Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

Theforegoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject toliability under this section.  Thiscertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to theextent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly incorporated by reference in anysuch filing.
| Dated: May 14, 2007 | /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.     |
|                | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Distribution Commander visits Tobyhanna

By DLA Distribution Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Distribution Tobyhanna PennsylvaniaDLADLA Distribution
exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Valspar Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 26, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
L. Mansfield, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Paul C. Reyelts,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                           /s/ William L. Mansfield
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           William L. Mansfield
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                           March 7, 2007


                                           /s/ Paul C. Reyelts
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Paul C. Reyelts
                                           Executive Vice President
                                           (Chief Financial Officer)

                                           March 7, 2007
No. 54871.

#### N. G. Basevi, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 159598-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Amphenol Corporation, Petitioner, and Microlab, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

November 9, 1965.

*White & Case*for petitioner. *Bemach S Lehrer*for respondent.

Emilio Nunez, J.

Motion for an order pursuant to CPLR 7503 (subd. [b]) staying arbitration is denied.

Microlab purchased an entire going business from the petitioner (Amphenol). The agreement was entered into on August 18,1964. On September 1,1964 questions arose as to petitioner’s representations as they existed in the contract. During the ensuing year attempts at negotiation were made respecting representation and performance of the contract. Settlement *47negotiations were terminated on September 21, 1965, and Micro-lab served its demand for arbitration on September 24, 1965.

Petitioner asserts that the respondent cannot seek rescission of the contract for fraud in the inducement and have the matter determined by an arbitration clause within the contract, maintaining that fraud in the inducement of the entire contract goes to validity of the whole contract and must first be determined by a court. The arbitration clause between the parties herein reads as follows: “In the event of any dispute, controversy or misunderstanding arising between the parties hereto which may directly or indirectly concern or involve any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof or the construction of any of its provisions or the general subject matter thereof, the parties agree to submit.”

The issue of fraudulent inducement of a contract may unquestionably be arbitrated in New York. Its arbitrability is, however, dependent upon the scope of the arbitration agreement. The single most significant ease against the proposition that fraud in the inducement is arbitrable is *Matter of Wrap-Vertiser Corp. (Plotnick)*(3 N Y 2d 17). In that case the court held that the arbitration clause was so narrow in scope that the question of fraudulent inducement did not come within its purview.

It is the court’s opinion that the arbitration clause herein is sufficiently broad so as to indicate that it was the intention of the parties to include questions of fraud and rescission as those arbitrable. (See *Matter of Fabrex Corp. [Winard Sales Co.],*23 Misc 2d 26.)

Petitioner’s further assertion of “laches” as justification for staying arbitration is without merit.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 100th LRS Fuels Facilities support flying mission

By Staff Sgt. Christine Groening100th Air Refueling Wing Public Affairs

                RAF MILDENHALL, England  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Royal Air Force Mildenhall website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Royal Air Force Mildenhall100th Logistics Readiness Squadronfuelfuel supportfuel testingcryogenicsoxygenliquid oxygen
U.S. RPA Region 10

Regional Administrator’s Office, R\ 140

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101

Dear Mr. McI £rran:

‘Ibis letter provides for your approval amendments to Alaska’s State Air Quality Control Plan or State

Implementation Plan (SIP), adopted by reference into the Alaska \dministrativc Code (A \C) at 18

AAC 50.030, with an effective date of August 1, 2012. The Alaska Department of I nvironmental

Consenation (ADI C) is submitting the enclosed SIP revision for purposes of meeting (lean \ir \ct

section 110(a)(2 infrastructure requirements for the 1997 and 2008 ozone National \mbient \ir

Quality Standards (NAAQS); the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS; and the 2008 Lead NAAQS. We areproviding one paper copy and one electronic version of the following documents to Kristin I lall of

your staff (note that the electronic version is an exact duplicate of the paper copy):

• Volume II: Analysis of Problems, Control Action:

• Section Ii: State Air Quality Control Program;

• Section 111.11.1: Interstate Transport of Lead Pollution;

• Volume III: (Appendices to Volume II)

• 18 AAC 50.030 proposed regulation amendment;

• Clean Air Act Section 110 Infrastructure Certification Documentation;

O AAC Title 2- Administration; Chapter 50- Alaska Public Offices Commission:

Conflict of Interest, Campaign Disclosure, Legislative Financial Disclosure, and

Regulations of Lobbying; Article I — Public Official Financial Disclosure (2 rAC50.010- 2 AAC 50.200); and

o i\AC Title 9—Law; Chapter 52— Kxecutive Branch Code of Ethics (9 AAC

52.010—9 AAC 52.990).

‘Ihe following supporting documents are also being provided:

1. IA. Governor’s certified Filing Certificate for Permanent Regulations along with

appropriate delegations, including Signed Adoption Order, with an effective date ofregulation, August 1,2012;

2. Notice of Public Comment Period, signed March 2, 2012;3. Supplemental Notice of Public Comment Period, signed April 6,2012;

4. (3) Affidavits of Publication for the Public Notice;
10. A copy of the tracked regulation amendments prepared by the Department of Law for

transmittal to the Lt. Governor for certification and filing, dated June 20, 2012.

Mr. Scott Sloane is available to your staff to respond to questions or to otherwise assist. lie can be

phoned at 907 465 5176. As always, I would be pleased to discuss any of this with you.

Sincerely,

4

Larry I lartig

Commissioner

Enclosures:

Rick Albright, EPA Region 10 w/o enclosures)Kristin I lall, EPA Region 10 (w/enclosures)

Alice Edwards, Director, Division of Air Quality, z\DEC (w/o enclosures)

Cynthia I leil, Program Manager, ANPMS Program, i\DEC @/o enclosures)

G:\COMM\WP\2012\12.133 McLerran rc SIP rnendmcnrs Otone NAAQS.docx