alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9937]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel--Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409 and 46 CFR part 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.

Non-Vessel--Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation Intermediary 
Applicants
    Henry's Leads Inc. dba Henry's Ocean Freight, 7102 Drew Hill Lane, 
Chapel Hill, NC 27514; Officers: Qiang Fu, President, (Qualifying 
Individual); Lixin Bai, Vice President.
    Transworld Logistics, LLC, 1720 S. Norfolk Lane, Anaheim, CA 92802; 
Officers: Tahnee Kang, President, (Qualifying Individual), Myung Hui 
Huh, Operating Manager.
    H Shipping, Inc. dba Pumyang Worldwide Shipping, 15934 S. Figueroa 
Street, Gardena, CA 90248; Officer: Hyun Chul Lee, President, 
(Qualifying Individual).
    Newport Container Line, Inc., 5250 W. Century Blvd., Suite 602, Los 
Angeles, CA 90045; Officers: Mohammed Baki, Vice President, (Qualifying 
Individual); Patrick Kwok, President/CEO.
Non-Vessel--Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants
    Aegis International, Inc., 23 Serenity Court, Southampton, NJ 
08088; Officers: Charles E. Godfrey, President, (Qualifying 
Individual); Sandra C. Shaw, Secretary.
    Tramex Corporation, 7270 NW. 35 Terrace, Suite <greek-i>202, Miami, 
FL 33122; Officers: Cesar Lizarzaburu, President, (Qualifying 
Individual); Ana Maria Lizarzaburu, Secretary.
    Gold Coast Shipping, LLC, 2964 Main Street, Hartford, CT 06120; 
Officer: Micheal A. Wiafe, President, (Qualifying Individual).
    Integrated Freight Solutions, Inc., 851 Hinckley Road, Burlingame, 
CA 94010; Officers: Mark Taro Yamasaki, Secretary, (Qualifying 
Individual); Henry Lung, President.
Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean Transportation Intermediary Applicants:
    Seastar International, LLC, 46 Country Club Blvd., Scotch Plains, 
NJ 07076; Officer: Ying Zhao, Owner, (Qualifying Individual).
    First Class Exporters, 1147 Willing Ham Drive, East Point, GA 
30344; Officers: Frank Obeng, Partner, (Qualifying Individual); 
Elizabeth Lowe, Partner.

    Dated: May 18, 2007.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-9937 Filed 5-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Filed 11/9/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2010 ND 207

In the Interest of R.J., G.J., H.J., and D.J., Children 

-------------------

Laura Davison, L.S.W., Cass 

County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

H.J., Respondent and Appellant

-------------------

Director, Cass County Social

Services, J.J., R.J., G.J., H.J., D.J., 

and Kathy Kassenborg, Guardian ad Litem,            Respondents

Nos. 20100298 - 20100301

In the Interest of A.J. and B.G., Children 

-------------------

Laura Davison, L.S.W., Cass 

County Social Services, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

H.J., Respondent and Appellant

-------------------

Director, Cass County Social

Services, J.G., A.J., B.G., 

and Kathy Kassenborg, Guardian ad Litem,            Respondents

Nos. 20100302 & 20100303

Appeals from the Juvenile Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas R. Herman, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Pam H. Ormand, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 3106, Fargo, N.D. 58108-3106, for petitioner and appellee.

Douglas W. Nesheim, 15 9th St. S., Fargo, N.D. 58103-1830, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of R.J., G.J., H.J., D.J., A.J., and B.G., 

Nos. 20100298 - 20100303

Per Curiam.

[¶1]H.J. appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights to her six minor children.  On appeal, she argues the juvenile court erred by concluding the deprivation of the children was likely to continue and the children would probably suffer serious harm absent termination of parental rights.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). 

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
# C_2015146EN.01000602.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/6

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2015 — GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Villiger Söhne GmbH

(Case C-494/13 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Figurative mark in colour including the word elements ‘LIBERTE american blend’ on a blue background - Opposition by the proprietor of the Community figurative mark including the word elements ‘La LIBERTAD’ - Refusal of registration)

(2015/C 146/08)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (represented by: I. Memmler and S. Schulz, Rechtsanwältinnnen)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent), Villiger Söhne GmbH (represented by: B. Pikolin, Rechtsanwältin)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,563
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,049
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     48,707
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,468
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,352
<LOANS>                                        202,031
<ALLOWANCE>                                        788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,269
<DEPOSITS>                                     220,533
<SHORT-TERM>                                    24,800
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,988
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,901
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 283,269
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,578
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,283
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   344
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,205
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,967
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,941
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,264
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,266
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,440
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,440
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.04
<LOANS-NON>                                        315
<LOANS-PAST>                                         7
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   760
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       32
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  788
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               788
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             85



</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Raner C. Collins, District Judge for the U.S. District **

Court for Arizona, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE R. BARANY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JANET C. VAN HAELST, Acting

Director of Industry Operations Seattle

Field Division Bureau of Alcohol Tabacco

Firearms and Explosives,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-35005

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00253-RMP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Rosanna Malouf Peterson, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 13, 2011

Seattle, Washington

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, PAEZ, Circuit Judge, and COLLINS, District ** 

Judge.

FILED

OCT 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Barany appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) on his claim that

the ATF improperly denied his federal firearms license (“FFL”) application. 

Barany argues that ATF lacked authority to deny his application on the basis of

willful violations of the Gun Control Act and its regulations committed by the

General Store, Inc. See General Store, Inc. v. Van Loan, 560 F.3d 920 (9th Cir.

2009).

Barany was listed as a “responsible person” on the General Store’s corporate

FFL. He was one of two corporate officers and one of two shareholders in a small

family-run corporation in which he actively participated in the management of the

day-to-day activities of the store. Moreover, it is apparent from the administrative

record, and specifically from the information disclosed in his FFL application and

in his interview with an ATF inspector, that Barany was applying for an FFL in

order to revive the General Store’s former gun department under another business

name and thus to evade the consequences of the revocation of the General Store’s

FFL. Under these circumstances, ATF was authorized under 18 U.S.C. §

923(d)(1)(C) to deny his FFL application based on the willful violations committed

by the General Store, Inc. 
Because denial of an FFL application is not the enforcement or assessment

of a civil penalty, the statute of limitations imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 2462 does not

apply here. Rivera v. Pugh, 194 F.3d 1064, 1068-69 (9th Cir. 1999). 

The district court therefore did not err in concluding that ATF was

authorized to deny Barany’s FFL application. 

AFFIRMED.
EX-21.1 Subsidiaries of Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp.

---

EXHIBIT 21.1  SUBSIDIARIES OF ELECTRONICS BOUTIQUE HOLDINGS CORP.

|1.  |  | EB Investment Corpa Delaware corporation                           
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|2.  |  | Electronics Boutique of America Inc.a Pennsylvania corporation     
|3.  |  | Electronics Boutique Canada Inc.a Canadian corporation             
|4.  |  | EB Catalog Companya Nevada corporation                             
|5.  |  | EBWorld.com, Inc.a Nevada corporation                              
|6.  |  | Elbo, Inc.a Delaware corporation                                   
|7.  |  | EB Finance, Inc.a Delaware corporation                             
|8.  |  | EB Services Company LLPa Pennsylvania limited liability partnership
|9.  |  | EB International Holdings, Inc.a Delaware corporation              
|10. |  | Electronics Boutique Australia Pty. Ltdan Australian company       
|11. |  | Electronics Boutique Korea Inc.a Korean Corporation                
|12. |  | Electronics Boutique Denmark Holdings ApSa Danish private company  
|13. |  | Electronics Boutique Denmark ApSa Danish private company           
|14. |  | Electronics Boutique Norway ASa Norwegian private company          
|15. |  | Electronics Boutique K.EB Italy srl, an Italian company             
|16. |  | Tradition Svenska AB, a Swedish company                             
|17. |  | Electronics Boutique AG, a German company                           

---

QuickLinks
# C_2014102EN.01001101.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/11

---

Order of the Court of 14 November 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale des Bouches du Rhône — France) — Anouthani Mlamali v Caisse d’allocations familiales des Bouches-du-Rhône

(Case C-257/13) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Absence of sufficient information concerning the factual and regulatory background to the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility))

2014/C 102/14

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale des Bouches du Rhône

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Anouthani Mlamali

Applicant:

Defendant: Caisse d’allocations familiales des Bouches-du-Rhône

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale des Bouches du Rhône — Interpretation of Article 11 of Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44) — Legally resident third-country national — Rejection of a claim for family allowances in respect of a dependent minor child who is himself a third-country national — Non-compliance with the statutory provisions concerning family reunification — Rejection based on the failure provide a medical certificate issued by the Agence nationale de l'accueil des étrangers et des migrations (National Agency for the reception of foreign nationals and migrants) — Equal treatment.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal des affaires de sécurité sociale des Bouches du Rhône (France), made by decision of 13 May 2013, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1771 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1771

For the relief of Patricia Donahue, individually and in her capacity as 
administratrix of the estate of Michael J. Donahue; Michael T. Donahue; 
                   Shawn Donahue; and Thomas Donahue.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 2011

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
For the relief of Patricia Donahue, individually and in her capacity as 
administratrix of the estate of Michael J. Donahue; Michael T. Donahue; 
                   Shawn Donahue; and Thomas Donahue.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF THE DONAHUE FAMILY.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds 
not otherwise appropriated, the amount of $6,335,100.00, the judgment 
entered by the United States District Court for the District of 
Massachusetts on May 6, 2009, plus interest as provided by section 1304 
of title 31, United States Code, to compensate Patricia Donahue, 
individually and in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of 
Michael J. Donahue, Michael T. Donahue, Shawn Donahue, and Thomas 
Donahue (the ``Donahues''), for costs related to and damages arising 
from the murder of Michael J. Donahue in Massachusetts in May 1982 as 
described in Docket No. 01-10433-RCL, filed in the United States 
District Court for the District of Massachusetts, and Docket Nos. 09-
1950 and 10-1766 filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the 
First Circuit.
    (b) Satisfaction of Claims.--The payment under subsection (a) shall 
be in full satisfaction of all claims of the Donahues against the 
United States in connection with the matter described in such 
subsection.
    (c) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS' AND AGENTS' FEES.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 25 
percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to, or 
received by, any agent or attorney for any service rendered in 
connection with the payment under this Act, as set forth in the section 
2678 of title 28, United States Code.
    (b) Enforcement.--Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
guilty of an infraction and shall be fined under title 18, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2

                         VLASIC FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC.




                                  CERTIFICATION




      I, the undersigned Secretary of Vlasic Foods International Inc., a New
Jersey corporation, certify that the attached document entitled

                             FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

is a true copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of Vlasic
Foods International Inc. on October 3, 2000, and that the same is still in
full force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
Vlasic Foods International Inc. this 10th day of October, 2000.



                                          Norma B. Carter
                                          Corporate Secretary
<PAGE>   2
                         VLASIC FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC.

                          BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION

                                 October 3, 2000

                                      * * *

                             FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

      RESOLVED, that the Form 10-K Annual Report for fiscal 2000 of Vlasic Foods
International Inc. in the form presented to this meeting, is hereby approved.

      FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary and the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and the Vice
President - Controller of Vlasic Foods International Inc. are authorized to
execute the Form 10-K Annual Report for fiscal 2000 approved by this resolution
and to cause such Form 10-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with such
modifications as may be required by the Commission or as may be desirable in the
opinion of such officers.

      FURTHER RESOLVED, that each of the directors and the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Vlasic Foods International Inc. are each hereby authorized
to execute in their respective capacities, a power of attorney in favor of Norma
B. Carter designating her as the true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent of
the signatory with full power and authority to execute and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission the Form 10-K Annual Report for
fiscal 2000 with all exhibits and other documents in connection therewith as
such attorney-in-fact may deem necessary or desirable; and to do and perform
each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the
premises as fully to all intents and purposes as such officers and directors
could do themselves.
EXHIBIT 99.6




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. §1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the amended Annual Report of Rubicon Minerals Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W. Adamson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and
  (2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  June 30, 2010                                            /s/David W. Adamson
  David W. Adamson
 Chief Executive Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rubicon Minerals Corporation and will be retained by Rubicon Minerals Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 96-7879.

#### Jahannes *v.*Reid.

Ct.. App. Ga. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 14, 1997, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
#### R. C. Webster, Jr., v. Joe Stevenson.

No. 15,963.

Tax *Deed*— Selling *Price Omitted.*A tax deed held void on its face because it failed to show the amount for which the land was bid in by the county.

Error from Ness district court; Charles E. Lob-dell, judge.

Opinion filed April 10, 1909.

Affirmed.

*D. A. Banta,*for the plaintiff in error.

*A. S. Foulks, A. W. Wilson,*and *Manford Schoonover,*for the defendant in error.

*Per Curiam:*

• The tax deed under which plaintiff claimed title is void on its face because it fails to state the amount for which the land was bid off by the county, and the omission is not cured by any of the other recitals. *(Robidoux v. Munson,*75 Kan. 207.) The amount for which the certificate was assigned is stated, but at the date of the assignment the taxes were due for two subsequent years, and it is impossible to ascertain from the face of the deed how much of the amount paid was for the taxes for the year for which the land was sold and how much was for the subsequent taxes. *(Gibson v. Ast,*77 Kan. 458.) The words “being equal to the cost of redemption at that, time” necessarily refer to the date of the assignment.

Upon the showing made the trial court committed no error in opening up the former judgment. The judgment is affirmed.