alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration 

                    By Notice dated October 25, 2006, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 1, 2006, (71 FR 64298), Cambrex Charles City, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Sufentanil (9740), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                 

The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. 

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Cambrex Charles City, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Cambrex Charles City, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. 

Dated: May 14, 2007. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

 [FR Doc. E7-9625 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### FERGUSON REORGANIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT, R-II, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 75588.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

June 22, 1999.

Elbert A. Walton, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

Frank Susman, Todd J. Aschbacher, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before JAMES A. PUDLOWSKI, P.J., WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, Jr., and CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, City of Berkley, appeals from the judgment entered for plaintiff, Ferguson Reorganized School District, RII, on its declaratory judgment action. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
(Reap. Dec. 9892)

#### Orbit Housewares Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 914278; 751110.

(Decided December 29, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff and the cases were ordered submitted by the court.

Eule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> Tbe submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Carey & Skinner, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7722.

Entry No. 157, etc.

(Decided July 28, 1949)

*Barnes, Richardson*<fc *Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement fisted in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> *260IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the.Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States,*R. D. 7624, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise involved in each of the cases enumerated in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed' facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28490-28491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9673]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center Web site at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 15, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Security Bank Corporation, Macon, Georgia; to merge with First 
Commerce Community Bankshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
First Commerce Community Bank, both of Douglasville, Georgia.


[[Page 28491]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 16, 2007.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-9673 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
No. 56739.

protest 180048-K (New York).

#### Fred B. Cooper Co., Inc., and F. J. Benkart *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue and merchandise herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Axel Stokby et al.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358), except that in the liquidation of the entries covered by the instant protest, an allowance was made for gelatinous substance equal to 10 percent of the content of the tins, whereas there should have been a larger percentage allowed for the gelatinous substance. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, the merchandise was held dutiable at *3}{*cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the net weight of the contents of the cans, less such percentage allowance for the gelatinous substance contained in the respective tins, as set forth in the decision.
(Reap. Dec. 9643)

#### M. Farris & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 701032; 701033.

(Decided March 22, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Goehr an Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a re-appraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff and the cases were ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any ease shall be made in open court by the-parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request tO' the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a ease does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the? *621issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I liave examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
89–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–369 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE 

COMMITTEE ON RULES 

DECEMBER 9, 2009.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 962] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 962, by a record vote of 9 to 3, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any resolution reported on the legislative day of December 10, 2009, providing for 

further consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 4173) to provide for financial regulatory reform, to protect consumers and investors, to enhance Federal understanding of insurance issues, to 

regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, and for other 

purposes. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 289 

Date: December 9, 2009. 

Measure: H. Res. 962, waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of 

rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 9–3. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with REPORTS
2 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Yea; Hastings—Yea; Matsui—Yea; 

Cardoza—Yea; Arcuri—Yea; Perlmutter—Yea; Pingree—Yea; 

Polis—Yea; Dreier—Nay; Diaz-Balart—Nay; Foxx—Nay; Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with REPORTS
No. 56734.

protests 169764-K, etc. (New York).

#### Amerex Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
TS-ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #3

Pt. 1, Sec. B 

CAS Inventory Expert Service Reports and Chemical Structures of the New Chemical 

Substances 

The following pages give the CAS Inventory Expert Service (IES) Reports on the new 

chemical substances. The chemical structures of the compounds are also provided.
<PAGE>


                             [LOGO] MetlifeInvestors
                    MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company
                         222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900
                                 P.O. Box 25130
                              Wilmington, DE 19899

PURCHASE PAYMENT CREDIT RIDER

This Rider forms a part of the Contract to which it is attached and is effective
as of the Issue Date. In the case of a conflict with any provision of the
Contract, the provisions of this Rider will control.

The Purchase Payment Credit is set forth on the Contract Schedule.

If you exercise the "Free Look" provision of the Contract, we will return your
Account Value less the Adjusted Purchase Payment Credit. The Adjusted Purchase
Payment Credit is equal to the lesser of:

     (a)  the portion of the Account Value that is attributable to any Purchase
          Payment Credit, or

     (b)  the total of Purchase Payment Credit(s).

This means that you receive any investment gain on the Purchase Payment
Credit(s) and we bear any loss.

Each Purchase Payment Credit will be allocated to the Contract in the same
proportion that the applicable Purchase Payment is allocated.

All Purchase Payment Credits shall be treated as earnings under the Contract.

If Joint Owners are named, the age of the oldest Owner will apply under this
Rider. If a non-natural person owns the Contract, then the Annuitant's age will
apply under this Rider.

MISSTATEMENT OF AGE OR SEX -- The "Misstatement of Age or Sex" provision in the
Contract is modified to provide that we may also require proof of age of any
Owner.

MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company has caused this Rider to be signed by
its President and Secretary.


/s/ Richard C. Pearson                  /s/ Michael Farrell
-------------------------------------   ----------------------------------------
           Secretary                                 President

8030 (2/08)-XXC
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1792

GEORGE VAN WAGNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DARRELL MCGRAW, Attorney General, State of West Virginia; 

MAGISTRATE JOAN BRAGG, Chief Magistrate, Magistrate Court of

Berkeley County, WV; RUBY KAY HAWKINS, Magistrate Clerk, 

Magistrate Court of Berkeley County, WV; JUDGE DAVID 

SANDERS, Chief Administrative Judge, Circuit Court of 

Berkeley County, WV; VIRGINIA SINE, Circuit Court Clerk, 

Circuit Court of Berkeley County, WV; CORPORAL JOSEPH 

WALKER, Corporal for WV State Police, Martinsburg 

Detachment; PAMELA GAMES-NEELY, Prosecuting Attorney, Office 

of the Prosecuting Attorney for Berkeley County, WV,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, 

Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00058-JPB-DJJ)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Van Wagner, Appellant Pro Se.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

George Van Wagner appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his “Emergency Petition for Writ of 

Prohibition.” We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Van Wagner v. McGraw, No. 3:11-cv-00058-

JPB-DJJ (N.D.W. Va. July 20, 2011). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Defense Logistics Agency at Robins Air Force Base: Director of Distribution shares insight

By Kristin Moriarty,  Houston Home Journal (Weekend Edition)

                WARNER ROBINS, Ga.  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionWarner Robins
#### William R. Ross, respondent, v. Eleanor J. Ross, appellant.

[Decided October 11th, 1918.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, whose opinion is reported *ante p. 261.*

*Messrs. Queen &*Stout, for the respondent.

*Mr. J. Emil*Walscheid, for the appellant.

Per Curiam.

We concur in the view of the vice-chancellor that the proofs submitted fully justify the conclusion that the respondent was entitled to the relief sought by him in this case. The decree 'of divorce which the appellant seeks to review will be affirmed.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 12.

*For reversal*— None.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jannett Wang, Vice President of Administration of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ Jannett Wang                
|Jannett Wang                    
|Vice President of Administration
|(chief financial officer)       
|                                
|February 11, 2004               

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.