alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Big Hill was named when the early
prospectors, heading to gold fields with
wagons and teams of horses, could barely
make it over the “Big Hill” when coming
from Spearfish.

Loops A, A-1, and B primarily meander
through mixed stands of quaking aspen,
paper birch, and ponderosa pine.

Loops C and D cross extensive stands of
ponderosa pine with small patches of
quaking aspen and paper birch.

Spur D-1 accesses a scenic overlook of

Spearfish Canyon and Spearfish Mountain.

During the winter season the trails are
groomed for cross-country skiing in
cooperation with the Black Hills Nordic
Ski Club. Please help by contributing at
the donation box at the trailhead.

k || Trail Ethics
£29} Please do not cut across switchbacks or
pioneer new trails.

| Extreme Weather

Clear, sunny days can quickly turn into
afternoon thunderstorms. Start hikes
early and carry raingear.

| Stream Water

&4 Do not drink it! Each trail user should

carry at least one quart of water.

| Motors and Machines
This trail is not maintained for the use
of motorized vehicle traffic.

2014 North Main
Spearfish, SD 57783
(605) 642-4622

1019 N. Sth St.
Custer, SD 57730
(605) 673-9200

*Remember that all hay brought
onto National Forest lands must
be certified weed free.

Enjoy the National Forest, but please
TREAD LIGHTLY and DON’T LITTER.

Location Map

5 Big Hill

e
Forest
ea \ Noth Trails
Office \ I-90
Four-Way o
Stop Sign ‘\

Trail Number 72

Scenic Byway

Spearfish Canyon

Savoy

Lake

Old Baldy Rimrock Trail i
Trail Little Spearfish I,
Trail i S

Black Hills {i¢s
National Forest

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its
programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability,
political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative
means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape,
etc.) Should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).

To file a complaint of program discrimination, write USDA Director, Office of Civil
Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW,
Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an

equal opportunity provider and employer.


Big Hill
Trails

Elevation: 5,000 to 5,480 feet

Length: Loop A 2.8 miles groomed

Loop Al 0.5 miles groomed
Loop B 3.5 miles ungroomed
Loop C 6.9 miles groomed
Loop D 7.5 miles groomed
Spur D1 0.2 miles ungroomed

Trail lengths shown represent the distance
from the trailhead around the loop and
back to the trailhead. Total length of all
trails is 13.6 miles.

Difficulty: Easy to Difficult
Location: From Spearfish take FSR 134

south approximately eight miles to the
trailhead.

Trails are marked with blue diamonds.

A

MAP
LEGEND

-— Creek

eUS. Highway
Forest Service Road (FSR)

® Trailhead

Scale - 2” = 1 mile

>> Chevrons - Indicate degree of slope and
point downhill. The closer together they
are, the steeper the hill. Between each
chevron is a vertical distance of 40 feet.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeff  Finkelstein,  the Chief  Financial  Officer of SmarTire  Systems,  Inc.
certify that:

1.    I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-KSB of SmarTire  Systems,
      Inc.;

2.    Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the  registrant  as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this  annual
      report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are  responsible  for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange  Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the  registrant  and
      have:

      a)    designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
            material  information  relating  to the  registrant,  including  its
            consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within
            those entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual
            report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
            of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)    presented  in  this  annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
            evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,  based on
      our most recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit
      committee of  registrant's  board of directors (or persons  performing the
      equivalent functions):

      a)    all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            controls which could adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have
            identified for the registrant's  auditors any material weaknesses in
            internal controls; and

      b)    any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal controls; and


October 29, 2004                                 /s/ Jeff Finkelstein
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Jeff Finkelstein, CFO
Before the Second Division,

November 6, 1942

No. 47706.

#### Protests 837417-G, etc., of G. Albrecht Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 54376.

#### T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 140350-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
# C_2013252EN.01003002.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2013 — Think Schuhwerk v OHIM (Red shoelace end caps)

(Case T-208/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark - Red shoelace end caps - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Procedure by default)

2013/C 252/49

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Think Schuhwerk GmbH (Kopfing, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 February 2012 (Case R 1552/2011-1), concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a sign consisting of red shoelace end caps

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Think Schuhwerk GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Think Schuhwerk GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.

1

---
# C_2014462EN.01000702.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Ilie Nicolae Nicula v Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Sibiu, Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu

(Case C-331/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Repayment of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of EU law))

(2014/C 462/12)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ilie Nicolae Nicula

Applicant:

Defendants: Administraţia Finanţelor Publice a Municipiului Sibiu, Administraţia Fondului pentru Mediu

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

EU law must be interpreted as precluding a system of repayment of a tax levied in breach of EU law such as the system at issue in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
# C_2013352EN.01001601.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2013 — Zoo Sport v OHIM — K-2 (zoo sport)

(Case T-455/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark ZOO Sport - Earlier Community word mark ZOOT and earlier Community figurative mark SPORTS ZOOT SPORTS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 352/29

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zoo Sport Ltd (Leeds, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Rungg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: K-2 Corp. (Seattle, United States of America) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 August 2012 (Case R 1395/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between K-2 Corp. and Zoo Sport Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Zoo Sport Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Zoo Sport Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 22.12.2012.

1

---
No. 65804.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/28227, 60/29239, and 60/30472 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 39190.

#### Protest 748304-G of A. J. Flick (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

On the record presented the claim for free entry under paragraph 1722 was sustained.
Exhibit 23.2 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 333-126573 on Form S-3, inRegistration Statement No. 333-116837 on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement Nos. 333-126312, 333-127464 and 333-133353 on Form S-3 of Strategic Hotel Capital, Inc. of our report dated February 24, 2006, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of SHC Prague InterContinental B.V. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Strategic Hotel Capital, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Prague, Czech Republic 

May 5, 2006
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Agency hosts industry leaders in quest to meet rising demand via closer collaboration

By John R. Bell

The pace of this increase is “more than ... forecasting tools can keep up with,” he said.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Strategic Engagementindustryindustry daycontractorsbusinesspartnershipsindustrial baseprivatemateriel availabilityreadiness
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 102 (Wednesday, May 28, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12135]

[[Page 30474]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 252

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendment

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to provide needed editorial 
changes.

DATES: Effective May 28, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Manuel Quinones, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), Room 3B855, 
3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 571-372-
6088; facsimile 571-372-6094.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends DFARS 252.211-7003(a) 
to correct the hyperlink in the definition of ``issuing agency.''

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252

    Government procurement.

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR part 252 is amended as follows:

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 252 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

252.211-7003   [Amended]

0
2. Section 252.211-7003 paragraph (a) is amended by removing ``http://
www.nen.nl/web/Normen-ontwikkelen/ISOIEC-15459-Issuing-Agency-
Codes.htm'' from the definition of ``issuing agency'' and adding 
``http://www.nen.nl/Normontwikkeling/Certificatieschemas-en-keurmerken/
Schemabeheer/ISOIEC-15459.htm'' in its place.

[FR Doc. 2014-12135 Filed 5-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-ep-P
```
Case No. 5,667.

#### GOODYEAR v. DAY.

Circuit Court, D. New Jersey.

1850.

Province of Jour — Fraud — General Issue— Pleadings — Immaterial Issue — Patents — Exclusive License — Suit for Tariff — Defenses.

1. The jury must find the issues as presented, •and assess the damages for the breach, if any, of the thing alleged. It makes no difference that it is an immaterial issue.

2. Where fraud is charged upon a party, in respect to his patent, it must be made out, at least prima facie.

3. Under a plea of the general issue, evidence may be introduced to show fraud or fraudulent representations on the part of the plaintiff as to the subject matter of the suit.

4. Where a patentee, G., gave to a person, D., an exclusive right or license to use his, G.’s, patented invention, for a certain consideration or tariff, G. agreeing, however, to take up and cancel all other licenses granted by him, and there being.a covenant between G. and D., that in the event of others claiming grants and using such invention, and thereby impairing the profits which would accrue to D., that then such tariff would cease, *held,*in an action of covenant for non-payment of such tariff and other non-com-pliances, that it was a good defence that others used the invention and impaired the right of D., and that it was of no consequence whether G. was unable to restrain other parties from such use, or.whether it was to his advantage or not to do so.

5. If a party, by his pleading, tender an immaterial issue, the jury must find the issue as presented, and assess damages for the breach, if any, of the thing.alleged. It makes no difference that it is an immaterial issue.

Before GRIER, Circuit Justice.

[Cited in Law, Pat. Dig. 235, 339, 342, 468, 5S9, to the points stated as above. Nowhere more.fully reported; opinion not now accessible.]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6842

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ERIC MARTIN PEPKE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:15

- cr - 00319

- FL

- 1 ; 5:17

- cv - 00631

- FL )

Submitted : November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Eric Martin Pepke , Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Martin Pepke seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge is sues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies r elief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pepke has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, although we grant Pepke’s motion to file an amended informal brief, we deny a certifica te of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna participates in 2018 Feds Feed Families campaign

By Dawn BonsellDLA Distribution Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna collected over 425 pounds of non-perishable food for the Central Pennsylvania Food Bank in Harrisburg as part of the 2018 Feds Feed Families campaign. The USDA led campaign was created to help food banks and pantries stay stocked during summer months when they traditionally see a decrease in donations and an increase in need. The Central PA Food Bank, Harrisburg serves Adams, Bedford, Blair, Centre, Clearfield, Cumberland, Dauphin, Franklin, Fulton, Huntingdon, Juniata, Lancaster, Lebanon, Mifflin, Northumberland, Perry, Snyder and York Counties.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionDistributionDefense Distribution Center SusquehannaFeds Feed FamiliesUSDAPeople and Culture