alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONSOF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Alan Rae, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of O2Diesel Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 15, 2005/s/ Alan R. Rae
No. 56759.

protests 174607-K, 174608-K, and 174609-K (Norfolk).

#### Molins Machine Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
| Signature                            |   | Title                                  | Date              |
|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|-------------------|
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
| /s/   Hervé Caen |   | Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief | May 24, 2011 |
| Hervé Caen                      |   | Financial Officer and Director         |              |
|                                 |   | (Principal Executive and Financial and |              |
|                                 |   | Accounting Officer)                    |              |
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
| /s/  Eric Caen             |   | Director                               | May 24, 2011 |
| Eric Caen                            |   |                                   |              |
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
| /s/ Michel Welter                    |   | Director                               | May 24, 2011 |
| Michel Welter                        |   |                                   |              |
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
| /s/ Alberto Haddad                   |   | Director                               | May 24, 2011 |
| Alberto Haddad                       |   |                                   |              |
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
|                                 |   |                                   |              |
| /s/ Xavier de Portal                 |   | Director                               | May 24, 2011 |
| Xavier de Portal                     |   |                                   |              |
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 20 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Hy brid 60 FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on January 19 , 2011 b etween Hy brid 60 and EPA and included the following individuals: Hy brid 60: Jeff Zy

burt, Jesse Baker, Lauren Gillis EPA: Angela Cullen The discussion focused primarily on the following elements of the proposal:  Advanced technology credits  Hy brid OBD
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Digital Fusion, Inc.
Tampa, Florida


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Digital Fusion, Inc. on Form S-3 (SEC file No. 333-44232, No.
333-80155 and No. 333-93595) and Registration Statement of Digital Fusion, Inc.
on Form S-8 (No. 333-44378) of our report dated January 25, 2002, except for the
third paragraph of Note 12(c) and Note 19 for which the date is February 28,
2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Digital Fusion, Inc.
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

Pender Newkirk & Company
Tampa, Florida
February 28, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JAMAR BLAINE PERRY,

Petitioner

v.

JUDGE JOHN D. MCBRIDE, JUDGE KIM TESLA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN LEE BROWN, DISTRICT

ATTORNEY AHMED AZIZ AND

PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 49 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17 th d ay of November, 2023, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the jurists from the caption.
#### United States *v.*Western Electric Company

No. 8066.

Entered at Chicago, Ill.

Entry No. 1965.

(Decided on rehearing [Reap. Dec. 7954] November 30, 1951)

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Arthur B. Martoccia,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Wallace & Schwartz (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*by *Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement filed on behalf of the United States against the findings and return of value made by the United States appraiser at the port of Chicago upon an importation of varnish. The case was originally tried and submitted before me, and upon the record so made a decision reported as *United States*v. *Western Electric Company,*26 Cust. Ct. 531, Reap. Dec. 7954, was rendered, and judgment in accordance therewith was entered.

Subsequently, a motion was made by counsel for the plaintiff for an order to vacate and set aside the decision and judgment entered and for a new trial, to the entry of which order counsel for the defendant consented. Upon certain findings made by the court, the motion *492was granted, and the case was thereupon set down for trial for all purposes at the ensuing Chicago docket.

The case was called for trial before me at the said Chicago docket, and it was then stated by counsel for the plaintiff that—

> * * * it is now conceded by the Government that the merchandise herein is a coal-tar product and dutiable under Paragraph 28 of the Tariff Act of 1980, on the basis of the American selling price, which is the unit value as entered and appraised at 12)40 per pound, plus the cost of drums, as- invoiced. Hence, the Government abandons its appeal.

In accordance with the foregoing statement, judgment will issue dismissing the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Intergovernmental solutionsnewsletter [electronic resource].**
 
2010Spring PDF
2009Fall: PDFWord | Spring: PDFWord
2008Fall: PDFWord | Spring: PDF (Esp)Word (Esp)
2007Fall: PDFWord | Spring: PDFWord | 
2006Summer/Fall PDFWord| Spring PDFWord
2005Summer: PDF
2004Fall PDFWord
 
SuDoc Number:GS 1.38:
Item Number:0559-J (online)
CGP systemNumber:000659149
 
January 9, 2020
EX-10.1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



 





EXHIBIT 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of January
8, 2008, between BLUELINX CORPORATION, a Georgia Corporation (the “Company”) and STEPHEN E. MACADAM
(“Executive”).



     WHEREAS, Executive and Company entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated
October 20, 2005; and



     WHEREAS, the Executive desires to postpone his contractual right under Section 4(b) of the
Agreement to an increase in his Base Salary of $50,000 in 2008 in recognition of the Company’s
decision to not provide salary increases to its officers in 2008 as part of its cost cutting
initiatives in response to the severe housing market in which it currently operates; and



     WHEREAS, the Executive’s Employment Period under the Agreement expires on December 31, 2008 as
provided under Section 5 (a) of the Agreement, subject to a one-year extension; and



     WHEREAS, the Company is in agreement with postponing Executive’s contractual right to a salary
increase in 2008 until 2009 and to extending Executive’s Employment Period for an additional year;



     NOW THEREFORE, the Executive and Company agree to extend the Employment Period under the
Agreement for an additional year until December 31, 2009 and further agree that Executive’s Base
Salary shall remain $750,000 for 2008 and shall be increased to $800,000 per year in 2009 rather
than in 2008.



     The parties are signing this First Amendment to the Agreement as of the date stated in the
introductory clause.



	 	 	 
	EXECUTIVE

	 	BLUELINX CORPORATION
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Stephen E. Macadam

	 	/s/ Barbara Tinsley
	 

	 	 
	Stephen E. Macadam

	 	Barbara Tinsley

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, &
Secretary
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

 

Inconnection with the quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q-A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

Theforegoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liabilityunder this section.  This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1is expressly incorporated by reference in any such filing.

 
| Date: November 10, 2005 | /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.     |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer        |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03015

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03015\03015_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03015\03015_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03015\03015_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03015\03015_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03015\03015_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03015\03015_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03015\03015_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03015\03015_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03015\EPA EG ICR Cover Letter & Certifications - We Energies.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03015\Questions for Plant ID 03015.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 03015\Supporting Documents\03015_PIPP EG ICR D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03015\Supporting Documents\03015_PIPP EG ICR MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03015\Supporting Documents\03015_PIPP EG ICR MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03015\Supporting Documents\03015_PIPP EG ICR Part C - Acreage Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03015\Supporting Documents\03015_PIPP EG ICR WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# C_2013171EN.01002702.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2013 — ABC-One v OHMI (SLIM BELLY)

(Case T-61/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark SLIM BELLY - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 171/53

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ABC-One Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH (Villach St Magdalen, Austria) (represented by: S. Merz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 November 2011 (Case R 1077/2011-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign SLIM BELLY as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ABC-One Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ABC-One Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
# C_2017030EN.01000201.xml

| 30.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 November 2016 — European Commission v Stichting Greenpeace Nederland, Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe)

(Case C-673/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Environment - Aarhus Convention - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Article 6(1) - Risk of an adverse effect on the commercial interests of a natural or legal person - Concept of ‘information relating to emissions into the environment’ - Documents relating to the authorisation procedure for an active substance contained in plant protection products - Active substance glyphosate))

(2017/C 030/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, P. Ondrůšek, P. Oliver, and by L. Pignataro-Nolin, Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: American Chemistry Council Inc. (ACC), CropLife America Inc., National Association of Manufacturers of the United States of America (NAM) (respresented by: M. Abenhaïm, avocat, K. Nordlander, advokat, and P. Harrison, Solicitor), CropLife International AISBL (CLI) (represented by: D. Abrahams, Barrister, R. Cana and E. Mullier, avocats, and A. Patsa, dikigoros), European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic), European Crop Protection Association (ECPA) (represented by: I. Antypas and D. Waelbroeck, avocats, and D. Slater, Solicitor), European Crop Care Association (ECCA) (represented by S. Pappas, dikigoros), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and A. Lippstreu, acting as Agents,

Other parties to the proceedings:

The other parties to the proceedings being: Stichting Greenpeace Nederland, Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (represented by: B. Kloostra and A. van den Biesen, advocaten)

The other parties to the proceedings being:

Intervener in support of the respondent: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: E. Karlsson, L. Swedenborg, A. Falk, U. Persson, C. Meyer-Seitz and N. Otte Widgren, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the respondent:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 8 October 2013, Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission (T-545/11, EU:T:2013:523); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 8 October 2013, Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission (T-545/11, EU:T:2013:523);

| 2. | Refers Case T-545/11 back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers Case T-545/11 back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 8.3.2014.

1

---
Exhibit
          32.2
  CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
          THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
          connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology,
          Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
          the
          Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sanding Tao,
          Chief
          Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
          as
          adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          that:
  1.
          The
          Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
          The
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
          November 13, 2007
  /S/
                    Sanding TaoSanding
                    Tao
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
#### J. Brian KING, Appellant, v. Kathy Ann KING, Appellee.

No. 98-1539.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 12, 1999.

*471Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant.

Richard T. Kozek, Miami, for appellee.

Before COPE, LEVY, and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Based on the child support guidelines in effect at the time of the modification proceedings, the general master properly deducted from the husband’s income, and added to the wife’s income, spousal support paid pursuant to court order in the marriage before the court. *See*§ 61.30(2)(a)9, (3)(g), Fla. Stat. (1997); ch. 96-305, §§ 3, 6, Laws of Fla. (effective May 30, 1996). On this particular issue, the decisions in *Lacaria v. Lacaria,*673 So.2d 542, 543 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), and *Pelton v. Pelton,*617 So.2d 714, 716 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), are no longer good law by reason of the 1996 statutory change. The trial court erred in granting the former wife’s exception on this point. Further, because the general master’s factual findings are supported by competent evidence, we find that the trial court also erred in granting the former wife’s remaining exceptions to the general master’s report. For these reasons, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the former wife’s exceptions and remand with directions to reinstate the general master’s report and recommendations. *See Goldfarb v. Agran,*546 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); *Bragassa v. Bragassa,*505 So.2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded.
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>mcert321-033104.txt
                                                                 Exhibit 32.1



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



               In connection with the Quarterly Report of Uptowner Inns, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Carl E. Midkiff
Chief Executive Officer
May 13, 2004
No. 45306.

#### Protests 681990-G, etc., of Economy Grocery Stores Corp. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.