alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Gabriel Calderon

- Ortiz ,

Petitioner,

v. Merrick B. Garland , U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 21

- 327 Agency No. A097

- 764

- 375

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 15, 2022 * *
Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Gabriel Calderon

- Ortiz , a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge ’ s (“IJ”) decision deeming his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
Torture abandoned , and finding him ineligible for cancellation of removal

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252

. We review for substantial evidence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argu ment. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 23 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 327

the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006), and w e review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings, Simeonov v. Ashcrof t , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004)

. We deny the petition for review. We do not address Calderon

- Ortiz’s contention that he was unjustly denied withholding of removal because the agency did not adjudicate this application , see Santiago

- Rodriguez v. Holder , 657 F.3d 820, 829 (9th Cir. 2011) (review lim ited to the grounds relied on by the agency ), and Calderon

Ortiz does not contend the BIA erred i n finding the IJ properly determined that he abandoned his application for withholding of removal , see Corro

- Barragan v. Holder , 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest issue in opening brief resulted in waiver). In his opening brief, C alderon

- Ortiz does not contend that the BIA erred in determining he is ineligible for cancellation of removal due to his criminal convictions. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) ( concluding petitioner waived challenge to issue not specifically raised and argued in his opening brief). Thus, Calderon

- Ortiz’s cancellation of removal claim fail s
. We reject Calderon

- Ortiz’s assertion that he is a lawful permanent resident as unsupporte d by the record. The BIA did not err in concluding that Calderon

- Ortiz failed to establish a violation of his due process rights b ased on allegations that the IJ was biased ,3 21

- 327

interrupted him, and failed to provide a reason for denying relief

. See Lata v.
I NS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim)

. The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIE D .
II 

Calendar No. 2 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 163 

To require that the Government prioritize all obligations on the debt held 

by the public in the event that the debt limit is reached. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. LEE, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. 

BARRASSO, Mr. JOHANNS, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. KIRK, Mr. ENZI, Mr. 

VITTER, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin, Mr. PAUL, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. COBURN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To require that the Government prioritize all obligations 

on the debt held by the public in the event that the 

debt limit is reached. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Full Faith and Credit 

5 Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 163 PCS

1 SEC. 2. PRIORITIZE OBLIGATIONS ON THE DEBT HELD BY 

2 THE PUBLIC. 

3 In the event that the debt of the United States Gov4 ernment, as defined in section 3101 of title 31, United 

5 States Code, reaches the statutory limit, the authority of 

6 the Department of the Treasury provided in section 3123 

7 of title 31, United States Code, to pay with legal tender 

8 the principal and interest on debt held by the public shall 

9 take priority over all other obligations incurred by the 

10 Government of the United States. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 2 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 163 

A BILL 

To require that the Government prioritize all oblievent that the debt limit is reached. gations on the debt held by the public in the 

JANUARY 26, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 74-841.

#### Porter et al. *v.*United States.

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.
No. 47062.

#### Protest 78656-K of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the siren whistles in question are composed in chief value of metal, not plated, similar to those the subject of Abstracts 39948 and 40480. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was therefore sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 249 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 249

  Recognizing Hostelling International USA for 75 years of service to 
            intercultural understanding and to youth travel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2007

 Mr. Delahunt submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing Hostelling International USA for 75 years of service to 
            intercultural understanding and to youth travel.

Whereas travel promotes awareness and knowledge of peoples, places, and 
        cultures;
Whereas hostelling is educational travel, local and global, using hostels and 
        programs to facilitate interaction among travelers, and with local 
        communities;
Whereas hostels are simple, safe, shared accommodations that promote community 
        and cooperation among users and introduce young people of limited means 
        to travel;
Whereas Hostelling International USA (HI-USA) is a nonprofit educational 
        organization established in 1934 as American Youth Hostels to promote 
        hostelling in the United States;
Whereas HI-USA since its founding has welcomed in its hostels more than 
        22,000,000 overnight stays of visitors from the United States and more 
        than 150 countries worldwide;
Whereas HI-USA today has a network of 70 hostels in areas of cultural, historic, 
        and recreational interest, often in partnership with public, private, 
        and other nonprofit organizations, that annually hosts nearly 1,000,000 
        overnights stays by both domestic and foreign travelers;
Whereas HI-USA today offers programs through its hostels and local chapters that 
        promote the appreciation of local culture and environment, while 
        facilitating the discovery of both world and self, to more than 65,000 
        participants annually; and
Whereas HI-USA has made a unique and notable contribution to intercultural 
        understanding in the United States and worldwide, especially among the 
        young: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) congratulates Hostelling International USA for its 75 
        years of service; and
            (2) commends Hostelling International USA for its 
        contributions to intercultural exchange and its leadership in 
        the field of youth travel.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2014129EN.01001902.xml

| 28.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — Globosat Programadora v OHIM — Sport TV Portugal (SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL)

(Case T-348/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL - Earlier national figurative mark SPORTV - Relative ground for refusal - Proof of use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))

(2014/C 129/24)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Globosat Programadora Ltda (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (represented by: S. Micallef, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Sport TV Portugal, SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: B. Braga da Cruz and J. Pimenta, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2012 (case R 2079/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Globosat Programadora Ltda and Sport TV Portugal, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Globosat Programadora Ltda to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Globosat Programadora Ltda to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Stepping toward energy resilience

By  R. Nial Bradshaw75th Air Base Wing Public Affairs

                HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Hill Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Hill Air Force Basesolar energysolar arrayEnergy Resiliencyenergy savings peformance contractrenewable energysolar powerESPC75th Civil Engineer Squadron
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Craig Burton, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of USIP.Com, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly  report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 

Date: August 9, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/ Craig Burton        |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Craig Burton, President |   |
|        |                         |        |  |  |

 

----
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S 

AERONAUTICS DIVISION 

Director 

William r. Panos I 200 E. gtll Ave., Cheyenne, WY 82001 I Telephone No. (307) 777-3952 I 

December 4, 2015 

James T. Brown, Financial Management Analyst 

Federal Aviation Administrat ion 

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (ACO) 

800 Independence Ave SW 

Washington DC 20591 

RE: State of Wyoming Compliance with the FAA Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue Policy 

Dear Mr. Brown: 

~ 

~ l:l<::tlllis J. Byrne 

Administrdtor 

I am writing to notify you that it is our understanding that the State of Wyoming is in compliance with FAA Policy and 

Procedure Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue. 

The State of Wyoming taxes aviation fuel at four cents ($0.04) per gallon (W.S. 39-17-104 (a) (ii)) and distributes these 

funds back to the city, town or county where the airport is located (W .S. 39-17-11 (c) (i)). These funds may only be used 

for the maintenance of the airport. In addition, the State charges a license tax of one cent {$0.01) per gallon on all 

gasoline. Although the license tax is not directly used to benefit aviation, the State allocates far more state funds to 

aviation and airport development each biennium to offset the revenue from the license tax. 

• In BFY2013-2014, aviation fuel taxes collected and returned to the local airport sponsor totaled just over 

$908,000. 

• License fees collected during the same period were $227,000. 

• State funding allocat ed to thE! Airport' r'rilprovement budget for airport development during BFY2013-2014 

totaled $10,24o;ooo in General Funds and $8,720,000 in Mineral Royalties & Severance Taxes. 

Please feel free to contact the Aeronautics Division at (307) 777-3952 if you h.ave any questions . 

. . : .. ·~ 

Dennis J. Byr e, Administrator t:_. 

Wyoming Department of Transportation Aeronautics 'Divisio!l· · ·. · i I,, ., 

1 : 

, . 

,- ,·. ·'... 

,r
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rose M. Robeson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Duke Energy Field
Services, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004

                                     /s/ Rose M. Robeson
                                     ------------------------------------
                                     Rose M. Robeson
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      21.1





**Subsidiaries
      of the Small Business Entity**





SmarTire
      Technologies Inc.


SmarTire
      USA Inc.


SmarTire
      Europe Limited











**[LETTERHEAD
      OF KPMG]**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





The
      Board
      of Directors


SmarTire
      Systems Inc.





We
      consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the 
registration  statements


(Nos.
      333-122098, 333- 107904, 333-107903,  333-93021,  333-80923, 
333-67751and


333-55810) 
      on Form S-8 of SmarTire  Systems Inc. of our report dated  September


16,
      2005,  except for note 21(b) which is as of September 23, 2005 and
      except for note 1 which


is
      as of
      June 30, 2006, with respect to
      the
      consolidated  balance sheets of SmarTire


Systems
      Inc. as of July 31, 2005 and
      2004,
      and the related consolidated  statements


of
      operations,  stockholders' equity
      and comprehensive  income (loss), and cash


flows
      for
      each of the years in the
      three
      year period ended July 31, 2005,  which


report
      appears in the July 31, 2005, 
      annual report on Form 10- KSB/A of SmarTire


Systems
      Inc. Our report dated September 
      16,  2005,  except for note 21(b) which is


as
      of  September  23, 2005 and except for note 1 which is as of June 30,
      2006,


includes 
      additional  comments  for U.S.  readers  on


Canada 
      - U.S.  reporting differences
      that states that the financial statements are


affected
      by conditions and
      events that cast substantial doubt on the Company's


ability
      to continue as a going 
      concern.  The financial  statements do not include


any 
      adjustments  that might
      result from the outcome of that uncertainty.





*/s/
                KPMG LLP*
              
              *Chartered
                Accountants*
              
              *Vancouver,
                Canada*
              *June
                30, 2006*
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                        CERTIFICATION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Prestolite Electric Holding, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, P. Kim
Packard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company

Date: March 19, 2004                               By: /s/ P. Kim Packard
                                                       ------------------
                                                       P. Kim Packard
                                                       President and
                                                       Chief Executive Officer