26846 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Notices 

The Department of Labor will not 

award a grant or agreement where the 

grantee/recipient has failed to accept the 

assurances and certifications contained 

in this section. By signing and returning 

this signature page, the grantee/ 

recipient is providing the certifications 

set forth below: 

A. Certification Regarding Lobbying, 

Debarment, Suspension, Other 

Responsibility Matters—Primary 

Covered Transactions and Certifications 

Regarding Drug-Free/Tobacco-Free 

Workplace. 

B. Certification of Release of 

Information, 

C. Assurances—Non-Construction 

Programs, 

D. Applicant is not a 501(c)(4) 

organization. 

Applicant Name and Legal Address: 

If there is any reason why one of the 

assurances or certifications listed cannot 

be signed, please explain. Applicant 

need only submit and return this 

signature page with the grant 

application. All other instruction shall 

be kept on file by the applicant. 

lllllllllllllllllll

Signature of Authorized Certifying 

Official 

lllllllllllllllllll

Title 

lllllllllllllllllll

Applicant Organization 

lllllllllllllllllll

Date Submitted 

Please Note: This signature page and any 

pertinent attachments which may be required 

by these assurances and certifications shall 

be attached to the applicant’s cost proposal. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

May 2007. 

Lisa Harvey, 

Grant Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7–9117 Filed 5–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FK–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–61,404] 

Air System Components, Inc.; El Paso, 

TX; Notice of Termination of 

Investigation 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, an 

investigation was initiated on April 30, 

2007 in response to a petition filed on 

behalf of workers of Air System 

Components, Inc., El Paso, Texas. 

The petitioning group of workers is 

covered by a duplicate petition (TA–W–

61,367) instituted on April 24, 2007 that 

is the subject of an ongoing 

investigation for which a determination 

has not yet been issued. Further 

investigation in this case would 

duplicate efforts; therefore the 

investigation under this petition has 

been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of 

May 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–9100 Filed 5–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–60,548] 

Alan White Company; Sulligent, AL; 

Notice of Revised Determination on 

Reconsideration 

On April 13, 2007, the Department 

issued an Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application on 

Reconsideration applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The notice was published in the Federal 

Register on April 23, 2007 (72 FR 

20139). 

The previous investigation initiated 

on December 7, 2006, resulted in a 

negative determination issued on March 

8, 2007, was based on the finding that 

imports of upholstered furniture did not 

contribute importantly to worker 

separations at the subject firm and no 

shift of production to a foreign source 

occurred. The denial notice was 

published in the Federal Register on 

March 22, 2007 (72 FR 13528). 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioner provided additional 

information regarding the subject firm’s 

customers. Upon further review of the 

initial investigation, the Department 

requested from a company official an 

additional list of declining customers of 

the subject firm. 

A survey of these customers revealed 

that a major declining customer 

increased its imports of upholstered 

furniture during the relevant period. 

The imports accounted for a meaningful 

portion of the subject plant’s lost sales 

and production. 

In accordance with Section 246 the 

Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 

amended, the Department of Labor 

herein presents the results of its 

investigation regarding certification of 

eligibility to apply for alternative trade 

adjustment assistance (ATAA) for older 

workers. 

In order for the Department to issue 

a certification of eligibility to apply for 

ATAA, the group eligibility 

requirements of Section 246 of the 

Trade Act must be met. The Department 

has determined in this case that the 

requirements of Section 246 have been 

met. 

A significant number of workers at the 

firm are age 50 or over and possess 

skills that are not easily transferable. 

Competitive conditions within the 

industry are adverse. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the additional 

facts obtained on reconsideration, I 

conclude that increased imports of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

those produced at Alan White 

Company, Sulligent, Alabama, 

contributed importantly to the declines 

in sales or production and to the total 

or partial separation of workers at the 

subject firm. In accordance with the 

provisions of the Act, I make the 

following certification: 

All workers of Alan White Company, 

Sulligent, Alabama, who became totally or 

partially separated from employment on or 

after November 22, 2005 through two years 

from the date of this certification, are eligible 

to apply for adjustment assistance under 

Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are 

eligible to apply for alternative trade 

adjustment assistance under Section 246 of 

the Trade Act of 1974. 

Signed in Washington, DC this 8th day of 

May 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–9103 Filed 5–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–60,757] 

Alan White Company; Shannon, MS; 

Notice of Revised Determination on 

Reconsideration 

On April 12, 2007, the Department 

issued an Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application on 

Reconsideration applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The notice was published in the Federal 

Register on April 23, 2007 (72 FR 

20139). 

The previous investigation initiated 

on January 12, 2007, resulted in a 

negative determination issued on March 

8, 2007, was based on the finding that 

imports of upholstered furniture did not 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES