alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Snnt n Ma m All-Americ a Qt y 

# lllll f :-'rPARTMENTO F

:^"V^'SPORTATIO N ;--^ TOPERATION S i^OOC T- I A'0:2 1 CIT Y O FSANT A MARJ A OFFIC EO FTH E MAYO R AN D CIT YCOUNCI L

I i n EAS TCOO KSTREET . ROO M ^ \ -SANT AMARIA . C Ay.>4M-5l'J( ) - KDS-yJS-fWS I • FA X S05-."H'>-O6.'i 7 • www.ci..<;.inta-inaria.ca.ii s Augus t 23 , 201 0 Susa n Kurlan d Assistan t Secretaryfo rAviatio n & Internationa l Affairs , X- 1 U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve , S E W88-32 4 Washington . D C 2059 0 Dea rMs . Kurland : I t ha s com e t o m yattentio n tha t th e Sant a Mari a Publi cAirpor t Distric t i s pursuin g a n extensio n o f ai rservic e t o Denver , Colorado . A s Mayo ro f th e Cit yo f Sant a Maria , I spea k

fo rth e Cit yCounci l I n sayin g tha t th e Counci l i s i n ful l suppor t o f thi s adde d service , whic h wil l benefi t bot h th e airline s an d ou rCity . Sant a Mari a i s th e larges t an d fastes t growin g Cit yo n th e Centra l Californi a Coast . W e ar e i n a n excellen t positio n t o ad d an d develo p ne wcompanie s an d provid e fo rfiitur e industria l growth . Th e adde d ai rservic e woul d allo wou r busines s leaders , a s wel l a s al l o f ou rresidents , t o trave l directl yt o Denve ran d connec t t o othe rflights . I t wil t als o provid e th e opportunit yfo rmor e peopl e t o com e t o ou rCit yan d diBcove ral l tha t Sant a Man a ha s t o offer . W e hav e exceptiona l resources , recreationa l facilitie s an d cx^mmunit yevent s ttiat enhanc e th e quali ^

o f lif e fa rresident s an d provid e leisur e an d entertainmen t fo rvisitors . Sant a Maria' s centra l locatio n make s it a destinatio n spo t fo rtourism , wit h a n unlmiite d numbe ro f attraction s an d activitie s withi n a ver yclos e distance . Ther e I s n o doub t tha i Skywes t Afrline s wil l se e a u incr^ais e o f ridershi p b yprovidin g th e additk)na l service . Th e Cityo f Sant a Mari a full yendorse s th e Sar ^ Mari a Publi cAirpor t Dfetrict' s effort an d stand s read yt o welcom e th e ne wai rsen/ice . 

### Sincerely , LARR Y |(AVAGN1N 0 Mayo r
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED STATES CODE)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Interplay Entertainment Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “10-K Report”) that:





1.
the 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:           May 24, 2011
/s/ Hervé Caen

Hervé Caen

Chief Executive Officer and

Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Data Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Art
Malone, Jr., Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

November 19, 2003               /s/ Art Malone, Jr.
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Art Malone, Jr.
                                 Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>




Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Data Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Art
Malone, Jr., Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

November 19, 2003               /s/ Art Malone, Jr.
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Art Malone, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
TS- ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #3

Pt. 1, Sec. B

CA S Inventory Expert Service Report s and Chemical Structure s of the New Chemical Substance s
The following pag es give the CAS Inventory Expert Service (IES) Report s on the new chemical substance s

. The chemical structure s of the compounds are also provided.
# C_2012165EN.01002502.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/25

---

Action brought on 28 March 2012 — Wehmeyer v OHIM — Cluett, Peabody (Fairfield)

(Case T-139/12)

2012/C 165/44

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wehmeyer GmbH & Co. KG (Aachen, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cluett, Peabody & Co. Inc. (New York, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 January 2012 in case R 2509/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 January 2012 in case R 2509/2010-1;

| — | Dismiss the opposition filed by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to the application for registration of the Community trade mark ‘Fairfield’; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Dismiss the opposition filed by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to the application for registration of the Community trade mark ‘Fairfield’; and

| — | Order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Fairfield’, for goods in classes 3, 14, 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 6294342

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 3079481 of the figurative mark ‘FAIRFIELD BY ARROW’, for goods in class 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partly rejected the contested trade mark

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that there was a likelihood of confusion between the two trademarks.

Pleas in law:

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION








<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quartly Report of Infinity  Capital Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Theodore A. Greenberg,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief Investment  Officer and
Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 15, 2008


Name: Theodore A. Greenberg

/s/Theodore A. Greenberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Secretary


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 48209.

Suit 4394.

#### *Swift & Co.*v. *United States.*

affirmed March 1, 1943. C. A. D. 230.
No. 39159.

#### Protests 64915-G, etc., of Lord & Taylor et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record certain items were held dutiable at 60' percent under paragraph 31 as articles in chief value of compound's of cellulose,. *Amberg*v. *United States*(T. D. 46204) and Abstract 37230 followed.. Embroidered: articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.
No. 39173.

#### Protest 937669-G of Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Kwong*v. *United States*(T. D. 49409) the wooden stands in question were held dutiable at 33)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412 as claimed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0083. PEDRO ALVARDO-VALLE v. THE STATE.

Pedro Alvardo-Valle pled guilty to criminal attempt to commit kidnappingwith

bodily injury and aggravated assault in 2017. Alvardo-Valle filed a motion to

withdraw his guilty plea. The trial court dismissed the motion, and Alvardo-Valle

filed a timely application for discretionary review.1

Based on the trial court’s order denying Alvardo-Valle’s motion to withdraw

his guilty plea, the motion was filed outside the term of court of his judgment of

conviction. See Ellison v. State, 283 Ga. 461, 461 (660 SE2d 373) (2008) (noting that

a motion to withdraw a guilty plea must be filed in the same term of court in which

the plea was entered and a trial court lacks jurisdiction to grant an untimely motion).

However, orders resolving out-of-time motions to withdraw guilty pleas have been

treated by our Supreme Court as directly appealable. See id.; Smith v. State, 283 Ga.

376, 376-377 (659 SE2d 380) (2008). Thus, it appears that the trial court’s order is

subject to direct appeal.

 We will grant an otherwise timely application for discretionary appeal if the

lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly,

this application is hereby GRANTED, and Alvardo-Valle shall have ten days from

the date of this order to file his notice of appeal with the trial court. If he has already

filed a notice of appeal in the trial court, he need not file an additional notice. The

1 The order from which Alvardo-Valle appeals is not file-stamped, but the

application nonetheless appears to be timely based on the date the order was signed. 

October 16, 2019
clerk of the trial court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the records

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/16/2019
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 157 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 157

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an investment 
     credit for solar light pipe property, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an investment 
     credit for solar light pipe property, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INVESTMENT CREDIT FOR SOLAR LIGHT PIPE PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 48(a)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end 
of clause (vi), by adding ``or'' at the end of clause (vii), and by 
inserting after clause (vii) the following new clause:
                            ``(viii) equipment that--
                                    ``(I) uses prismatic or other 
                                lenses, glazing, reflectors, or 
                                concentrators to convey or diffuse (or 
                                both) natural light into a structure, 
                                or uses a highly reflective light pipe 
                                which has a solar collection component 
                                and a distribution lens at the ends to 
                                transport visible solar radiation from 
                                its collection point to illuminate the 
                                interior of a structure, and
                                    ``(II) integrates automatic 
                                lighting controls to adjust 
                                traditionally powered lighting to 
                                satisfy building lighting 
                                requirements,''.
    (b) Credit Percentage.--Clause (i) of section 48(a)(2)(A) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end 
of subclause (III) and by inserting after subclause (IV) the following 
new subclause:
                                    ``(V)   energy property described 
                                in paragraph (3)(A)(viii), and''.  
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to periods after the date of the enactment of this Act, under 
rules similar to the rules of section 48(m) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment 
of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1   Bingham Canyon Corporation  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Bingham Canyon Corporation certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bingham Canyon Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bingham Canyon Corporation.   Date: July 31, 2009/s/ Brett D. Mayer
Brett D. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Intellon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles
E. Harris, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles E. Harris                            
|                     |  |  |  | Charles E. Harris                                
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1** **CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted),Edward A. Keible, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Endwave Corporation (the “Company”), and Brett W.Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:      **1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the ***“Quarterly Report”***) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and      **2. **The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.      **InWitness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 8th day of May,2008.    /s/    EdwardA. Keible, Jr.         /s/    BrettW. Wallace           Edward A. Keible, Jr. Brett W. WallaceChief Executive Officer Chief Financial OfficerThis certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofEndwave Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 40498.

#### Protest 957988-G of Hori Brothers (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that the merchandise consists of purses in chief value of silk. The claim at 65 percent under paragraph 1211 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Huifeng Bio-Pharmaceutical Technology,
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of, I, Jing’an Wang, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
November 13, 2009




/S/
      Jing’an WangJing’an
      Wang
              Chief
      Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed by the Company and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.