alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAladyn - Adaptive Neural Network Molecular Dynamics Simulation Code: Computational Materials Mini-ApplicationThis report provides an overview and commands description of the Computational Materials mini-application, Aladyn. Aladyn is a simple molecular dynamics code written in FORTRAN 2008, which is designed to demonstrate the use of adaptive neural networks (ANNs) in atomistic simulations. The role of ANNs is to reproduce the very complex energy landscape resulting from the atomic interactions in materials with the accuracy of quantum mechanics-based energy calculations. The ANN is trained on a large set of atomic structures calculated using the density functional theory (DFT) method. The Aladyn code is being released to serve as a training testbed for students and professors in academia to explore possible optimization algorithms for parallel computing on multicore central processing unit (CPU) computers or computers utilizing many core architectures based on graphic processing units (GPUs). The effort is related to the High Performance Computing Incubator (HPCI) project at NASA Langley Research Center.Document ID20180007916Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsYamakov, Vesselin I.*(National Inst. of Aerospace Hampton, VA, United States)*Glaessgen, Edward H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 29, 2018Publication DateNovember 1, 2018Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-30836NASA/TM-2018-220104L-20954Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 698259.02.07.07.03.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180007916.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
No. 55579.

#### Wm. Turino Co. *v.*United States,

protest 167168-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ETHAN L. KING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1546

[July 18, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Okeechobee County; Robert L. Pegg, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

472019CF000394A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Devin Johnson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Optimum Source  International,
Ltd.  on Form  10-KSB for the period  ending  June 30,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
Jackson,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Jeffrey Jackson
Jeffrey Jackson
President
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


September 26, 2003


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-129973) pertaining to the 2005 Stock Option Plan of Global-Tech Advanced Innovations Inc. (The Company and formerly
known as Global-Tech Appliances, Inc.);
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-9182) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan of the Company; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-10932) pertaining to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of the Company;
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated August 30, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company appearing in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2010.



|               
|---------------
|/s/ BDO Limited
|Hong Kong      
|August 30, 2010
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration
 Periodically, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) publishes abstracts of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of the clearance requests submitted to OMB for review, call the HRSA Reports Clearance Office on (301) 443-1129. The following request has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995: Proposed Project: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OMB No. 0915-0286)—Extension The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) necessitates certain record keeping and reporting requirements in order to perform the functions related to organ transplantation under contract to HHS. OMB requires review and approval of record keeping and reporting requirements associated with the final rule governing the operation of the OPTN (42 CFR part 121) related to Secretarial review and appeals. There are record keeping and reporting requirements associated with the process for filing appeals in the case where applicants are rejected for membership or designation in the OPTN. To date, no appeals have been filed. The burden requirements for this process are minimal. The estimate of burden for this process consists of preparing a letter requesting reconsideration and compiling supporting documentation. The estimated annual burden is as follows: Section of final rule
Number of 
                             respondents
Responses per 
                             respondent
Total 
                             responses
Hours per 
                             response
Total burden hours42 CFR 121.3(c)(4) Appeal for OPTN membership
2
1
2
3
642 CFR 121.9(d) Appeal for designation
2
1
2
6
12Total
4

4

18
 Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: Karen Matsuoka, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. Dated: May 11, 2007. Caroline Lewis, Associate Administrator for Management.


[FR Doc. E7-9546 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
No. 49434.

#### Protests 27765-K, etc., of B. R. Anderson & Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was agreed to have an analysis made by the Government laboratory at San Francisco. From the testimony of the chemist who made this analysis it was found the merchandise is something more than wood charcoal, -wood charcoal being only one of the ingredients contained therein. *320It was therefore held properly assessed as a nonenumerated manufactured article.
# C_2012250EN.01001802.xml

| 18.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/18

---

Action brought on 29 June 2012 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-290/12)

2012/C 250/34

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and M. Szpunar, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Article 1(2), (3), (4), (6), (12) and (13), Annexes I and II, and Article 2(1) to (3), in conjunction with Article 3, of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 302/2012 of 4 April 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (OJ L 99 of 5.4.2012, p. 21); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Article 1(2), (3), (4), (6), (12) and (13), Annexes I and II, and Article 2(1) to (3), in conjunction with Article 3, of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 302/2012 of 4 April 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (OJ L 99 of 5.4.2012, p. 21);

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law:






  — | infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law:

—

infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations;

| 2. | Second plea in law:






  — | infringement of the principle of proportionality; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law:

—

infringement of the principle of proportionality;

| 3. | Third plea in law:






  — | breach of Article 296 TFEU by virtue of the inadequate reasons given for the contested provisions; |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law:

—

breach of Article 296 TFEU by virtue of the inadequate reasons given for the contested provisions;

| 4. | Fourth plea in law:






  — | infringement of the principles of solidarity and of loyal cooperation. |
| --- | --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law:

—

infringement of the principles of solidarity and of loyal cooperation.

---
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Seychelle Environmental Technologies,
      Inc.
      (the “small business issuer”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended February
      28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, Carl Palmer, Chief Executive Officer of the small business
      issuer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s
      knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                small
                business issuer.








/s/
      Carl Palmer


Carl
      Palmer


Chief
      Executive Officer,




August
      22, 2007
From: "Roth, Andy" <rothaj@rapca.org>

To: "Koval, Paul" <paul.koval@epa.state.oh.us>, Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "McClure, 

Diane" <Diane.McClure@epa.state.oh.us>

Date: 08/08/2012 02:12 PM

Subject: RE: Large Hard Chromium Electroplating sources in Ohio

I have the following test dates and emission rates:

U.S. Chrome 05/26/2004 0.0052 mg/dscm

Hohman Plating 05/16/2003 0.0115 mg/dscm

It is my understanding that the MACT limit is 0.015 mg/dscm.

Of course those are concentration values. If you need mass emission rates, I can supply the ventilation 

rates to you.

From: Koval, Paul [mailto:paul.koval@epa.state.oh.us]

Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 5:21 PM

To: Chuck French; McClure, Diane

Subject: RE: Large Hard Chromium Electroplating sources in Ohio

I forwarded this to the appropriate people in the local air agency. I will check again if they have made 

any progress on getting some answers. Will let you know soon. PK

From: Chuck French [mailto:French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 12:14 PM

To: McClure, Diane; Koval, Paul

Subject: Re: Large Hard Chromium Electroplating sources in Ohio

Hi Diane and Paul,

Did you receive my email from last week (shown below)? Do you think you might be able to find any 

information on these 2 plants? If so, could you please send it within the next couple days, if possible.

Thanks.

Chuck 

Phone: 919-541-7912
Chuck French---08/03/2012 05:38:26 PM---Hi Diane and Paul, Based on our data set, there are 2 Large 

Hard Chromium Electroplating pla

From: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US

To: diane.mcclure@epa.state.oh.us, paul.koval@epa.state.oh.us

Date: 08/03/2012 05:38 PM

Subject: Large Hard Chromium Electroplating sources in Ohio

Hi Diane and Paul,

Based on our data set, there are 2 Large Hard Chromium Electroplating plants in Dayton Ohio that are 

among the higher emitting plants in the U.S. The 2 plants are U.S. Chrome Corporation of Ohio (107 

Westboro Street, Dayton, OH), and Hohman Plating & Manufacturing (814 Hillrose Avenue, Dayton, 

Ohio). Based on our data, they have emissions concentrations of 0.013 mg per dry standard cubic meter 

(mg/dscm) and 0.012 mg/dscm, respectively. However, I believe these concentration estimates may be 

based on tests that were conducted more than 12 years ago. Could you please let me know ASAP if Ohio 

EPA has any newer test data for these 2 facilities, and if so what the results are? We would really like to 

know the exhaust gas concentration in mg/dscm. Also, if possible we would like to know what type of 

control device they have on the large hard chromium electroplating processes, and the emissions 

estimates in lbs/yr, if possible.

Thank You.

Chuck French

Metals and Inorganic Chemicals Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA

Phone: 919-541-7912
# C_2013156EN.01004302.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/43

---

Order of the General Court of 11 April 2013 — Tridium v OHIM — q-bus Mediatektur (SEDONA FRAMEWORK)

(Case T-467/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 156/81

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tridium, Inc. (Richmond, Virginia, United States) (represented by: M. Nentwig, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: q-bus Mediatektur GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M.-T. Schott, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 August 2012 (Case R 1943/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between q-bus Mediatektur GmbH and Tridium, Inc.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate in the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate in the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Annual Report of International Smart Sourcing, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 26, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Hale, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1.     | The report fully complies   with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange   Act of 1934; and                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | 2.     | The information contained   in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial   condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period   covered by the Report. |

 

|   | /s/   DAVID HALE                                |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                 |
|   | **David Hale   Acting Chief Financial Officer** |
|   | March 17, 2004                                  |
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL


The Board of Directors
Hudson River Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement  (No.
333-58615) on Form S-8 of Hudson River Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated May 14,
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Hudson River Bancorp,  Inc.
and  subsidiary  as of March 31,  1999 and 1998,  and the  related  consolidated
income statements,  statements of changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended  March 31,  1999,  which
report  appears in the March 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Hudson River
Bancorp, Inc.


/s/KPMG LLP
---------------
KPMG LLP

Albany, New York
June 25, 1999
[No. 14439.

Department Two.

April 27, 1918.]

#### Mary N. Hatch, *Appellant,*v. Hover-Schiffner Company *et al.,*Respondents.1

Appeal—Record—Exceptions—Statement of Facts. In the absence of exceptions to the findings of fact, or any statement of facts, an appeal in which there is no question raised which is determinable apart from the facts will be dismissed and the judgment will be affirmed.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered December 18, 1916, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action for damages, tried to the court.

Affirmed.

*Robertson & Miller*and *C. H. White,*for appellant.

*A. E. Gallagher,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 172 Pac. 817.

Per Curiam.

In this case no exceptions were taken to any of the findings of fact and conclusions of law as *552made by tbe court, and no statement of facts or bill of exceptions is in tbe record, nor bas any been settled or allowed by tbe trial court. No question is raised wbicb is determinable apart from facts to be shown by a statement of facts. - It has been repeatedly held by this court that, where no exceptions have been taken to tbe findings and where there is no statement of facts, there is nothing before this court to. review and we must dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment. *Beeler*v. *Barr,*90 Wash. 258, 155 Pac. 1040, and cases there cited.

Judgment affirmed.
| 1. | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      August 19, 2009                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |
|                                                              |
| /s/ Rik J. Deitsch                                                |
| Rik      J. Deitsch                                               |
| Chief      Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial      Officer |

----
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         The  undersigned,  who is the  chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Clover Community Bankshares,  hereby certifies that, to the
best of her knowledge,  the accompanying Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2003,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information  contained in the report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the issuer.

March 30, 2004

                             s/Gwen M. Thompson
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Gwen M. Thompson
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer