alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated January 16, 2007, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on January 23, 2007, (72 FR 2907), Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 870 Badger Circle, Grafton, Wisconsin 53024, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule I and II: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IDihydromorphine (9145)
IDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IISufentanil (9740)
IIFentanyl (9801)
IIRemifentanil (9739)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: May 14, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E7-9642 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Forrest P. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of IWTTesoro Corporation, certify that:

 

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q/A of IWT TesoroCorporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004;

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisannual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

----

 

6.          I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: September 23, 2004 | By:                     | /s/ Forrest P. Jordan |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                     | Forrest P. Jordan,      |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

GARY LYNN BROZIK,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 10 WAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# MX, CES Airmen perform first of its kind repair in AOR

By Tech. Sgt. Christopher Hubenthal379th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs

                AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

379th Air Expeditionary Wing8th Expeditionary Aircraft Maintenance Squadron379th Expeditionary Civil Engineer SquadronrepairAircraft repairaircraft parts
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          40,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,394
<ALLOWANCES>                                       152
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,546
<PP&E>                                          26,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,318
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 257,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,841
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                     125,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   257,675
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,912
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,669
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,302
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,873
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,429
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,429
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JING LI; DIANBO ZHOU, 

Petitioners, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-72799 

Agency Nos. A206-038-593 

A206-038-594 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 17, 2019 

Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BURY,**

District Judge.

An immigration judge (“IJ”) ordered Jing Li and Dianbo Zhou, natives and 

citizens of China, removed and rejected Li’s application for asylum and withholding 

of removal. After the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissed the 

petitioners’ appeal, they filed this petition for review. We have jurisdiction under 8 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable David C. Bury, United States District Judge for the 

District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUN 7 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-72799 

U.S.C. § 1252, and reviewing the factual findings underlying the agency’s denial of 

asylum and withholding of removal for substantial evidence, Madrigal v. Holder, 

716 F.3d 499, 503 (9th Cir. 2013), we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Li failed to 

demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution under either a pattern or practice or 

disfavored group analysis. See Halim v. Holder, 590 F.3d 971, 977–79 (9th Cir. 

2009). Contrary to Li’s contention, the record does not suggest that the agency failed 

to consider her arguments or the evidence presented. Indeed, the BIA explained that 

Li failed to make the requisite showing of a well-founded fear even considering her 

testimony that she wishes to serve as a church leader. The BIA also “agreed” with 

the IJ’s analysis regarding the level of persecution of Christians, who are not

affiliated with the government sanctioned church. The IJ’s analysis included an

express recognition that the number of reported incidents of persecution “represents 

a floor, not a ceiling of the actual total number.” See Del Cid Marroquin v. Lynch, 

823 F.3d 933, 936–37 (9th Cir. 2016) (court may look to IJ’s decision “as a guide to 

what lay behind the BIA’s conclusion” if the BIA expresses its agreement with the 

IJ’s reasoning (citation omitted)). Li has failed to identify record evidence that 

compels a conclusion contrary to that of the agency. See Halim, 590 F.3d at 977–

79. 
3 15-72799 

Because substantial evidence supports the denial of asylum, substantial 

evidence necessarily supports the agency’s denial of withholding of removal as well. 

See Mansour v. Ashcroft, 390 F.3d 667, 673 (9th Cir. 2004) (applicant who fails to 

show well-founded fear of future persecution under asylum standard “necessarily 

fails to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2013009EN.01004201.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/42

---

Action brought on 3 November 2012 — Golam v OHIM — Pentafarma (METABOL)

(Case T-486/12)

2013/C 9/75

Language in which the application was lodged: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sofia Golam (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N.Trovas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pentafarma-Sociedade Tecnico-Medicinal, SA (Prior Velho, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | uphold the present action, so as to annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 July 2012 in Case R 1901/2011-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the present action, so as to annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 July 2012 in Case R 1901/2011-1;

| — | reject the opposition of the other party before the Board of Appeal and grant the application lodged by the applicant in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition of the other party before the Board of Appeal and grant the application lodged by the applicant in its entirety;

| — | order the other party before the Board of Appeal to pay the applicant the costs of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party before the Board of Appeal to pay the applicant the costs of the present proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Sofia Golam

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘METABOL’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 16 and 30 — Community trade mark application No 8885287

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Pentafarma-Sociedade Tecnico-Medicinal, SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the Portuguese word mark ‘METABOL-MG’ which has been registered under No 241841, for goods in Class 5

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: decision of the Opposition Division annulled in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Articles 8(1)(a) and (b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET OF OPTIMUM SOURCE INTERNATIONAL,  LTD. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
THE RELATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001056256
<NAME>                        OPTIMUM SOURCE INTERNATIONAL, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   128
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    32
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       12
<OTHER-SE>                                     983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1162
<SALES>                                        183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183
<CGS>                                          56
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  56
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               38
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                75
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   75
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.03



</TABLE>
### -82 -80 -78 -76

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 09/08 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 621st CRW, Army participate in airfield-opening exercise in Wisconsin

By Airman 1st Class Christian Conrad60th Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs

                FORT MCCOY, Wis.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Air Mobility Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Fort McCoyExercise Turbo DistributionJoint Task Force-Port Opening821st Contingency Response Group621st Contingency Response WingContingency response
#### James W. Boyle v. E. W. Sayers *et al.*

No. 16,049.

Service by *Publication*— Affidavit—Notice—Petition. An affidavit for service by publication, the publication notice and the petition held sufficient against a collateral attack.

Error from Logan district court; Jacob C. Ruppenthal, judge.

Opinion filed June 5, 1909.

Affirmed.

*John B. Ennis,*for the plaintiff in error.

*S. N. Hawkes,*and *W. L. Sayers,*for the defendants in error.

*Per Curiam:*

James W. Boyle brought an action of ejectment against E. W. Sayers and others, who defended under a tax deed and also under a sheriff’s sale upon a mortgage foreclosure. The only tax deed shown in the record does not describe the land in controversy, but it is doubtful whether this was the deed relied on. This, however, need not be determined, for the following are the only objections made to the foreclosure proceedings, and they are insufficient as a ground of collateral attack: The affidavit made as a basis for service by publication did not describe the land, and in attempting to state that personal service of summons could not be had upon the defendants within the state omitted the word “personal”; the petition and publication notice named several defendants and several tracts of land but did not indicate that any particular defendant was interested in any particular tract more than in any other.

The judgment is affirmed.