alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015007EN.01000301.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Agentur für Arbeit Krefeld — Familienkasse v Susanne Fassbender-Firman

(Case C-4/13) (1)

1

((Social security - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Family benefits - Rules governing cases of overlapping entitlements to family benefits))

(2015/C 007/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Agentur für Arbeit Krefeld — Familienkasse

Appellant:

Respondant: Susanne Fassbender-Firman

Respondant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 76(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1606/98 of 29 June 1998, must be interpreted as authorising the Member State of employment to provide in its legislation for suspension by the competent institution of entitlement to family benefits when no application has been made for family benefits in the Member State of residence. In such circumstances, if the Member State of employment provides for such suspension of entitlement to family benefits in its national legislation, the competent institution is bound to apply that suspension in accordance with Article 76(2) of Regulation No 1408/71, provided that the conditions for the application of that legislation are met, and has no discretion in that regard.

---

(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.

1

---
#### Thomas N. Egery *versus*Anthony Woodard.

The dale of delivery of a deed is the time when it first becomes effectual as an instrument of conveyance.

Evidence that a deed, bearing date March 20, but acknowledged and delivered April 25, of the same year, was thus dated for the purpose of rendering the grantee liable for the taxes of that year, is inadmissible in an action of covenant to recover the amount paid for taxes.

The liability of an estate to taxation relates back to April 1, of each year.

On Report.

Action for breach of covenant. Plea, general issue.

The plaintiff introduced a deed to himself, signed by the defendant, bearing date March 20, 1865, acknowledged April 25, 1865, and proof *aliunde*of its actual delivery on the day of the acknowledgment. He also proved payment by him, May 19, 1866, of the city, county and State taxes assessed upon the property described in the deed and wTrit, for the year 1865, to the amount of $157,50. It also appeared that the warrant of commitment, to the collector of taxes of the city of Bangor, bore date Sept. 7, 1865.

The defendant offered to prove that the deed was dated prior to April 1, 1865, in order to cover the question of taxes, and make them payable by the grantee. Whereupon the case was reported to the full Court, with an agreement that if the evidence offered by the defendant is not admissible, and the incumbrance attached April 1, instead of Sept. 7, 1865, the defendant was to be defaulted for the amount *46paid by the plaintiff, with interest from date of such payment.

*J. A. Peters*and *F. A. Wilson,*for the plaintiff.

*T. H. Qarnsey,*for the defendant.

Appleton, C. J.

—Taxes on realestate are to be assessed in the town, where the estate lies, to the person who is the owner, or in possession thereof, on the first day of April, of each year. R. S., 1857, c. 6, § 8.

The assessment must necessarily be made, the warrant for collection issued and the taxes collected, after that date. The liability of the estate to taxation relates back to that time.

No exception is taken to the legality of the assessment of the taxes, which the plaintiff has paid and now seeks to recover back.

A deed, though duly executed while under the dominion of the grantor, and before its delivery, transfers no title. It takes effect from' and by delivery, and not from its date. The defendant’s deed was first effectual after the land conveyed • became liable for taxes assessed or to be assessed thereon for the then current year.

Parol evidence is not admissible to vary or control the effect of a deed. If it were, the evidence offered, that a false date was inserted for the purpose of affecting the legal construction of the deed and changing the rights of the parties, could not have such effect, as the date of the delivery is the time when the deed first becomes effectual as an instrument of conveyance.

*Defendant defaulted for*$157,50,

*with interest from May*19, 1866.

Kent, Walton, Dickerson, Barrows and Daneorth, JJ., concurred.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 108]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3020]]

Public Law 111-108
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   936 South 250 East in Provo, Utah, as the ``Rex E. Lee Post Office 
           Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2009 -  [H.R. 3547]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REX E. LEE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 936 South 250 East in Provo, Utah, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Rex E. Lee Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rex E. Lee 
Post Office Building''.

    Approved November 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3547:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Oct. 7, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
SIBLING
ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.(A Development Stage Company) Exhibit
32.1 Certification
by the President pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Sibling
Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-KSB/A for the
period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mitchell Maxwell, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein. SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.Date: October 17, 2006
By:
/s/ Mitchell MaxwellMitchell MaxwellPresident & Chief Executive Officer This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. 39
### Reconnaissance of the geology and ground-water resources of the Glendo-Wendover area, Platte County, Wyoming, with a section on the chemical quality of the water

By: John Richard RappH. M. BabcockW. H. Durum

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir163

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 46445.

#### Protest 34477-K of Burns Lumber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J!

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported The protest was therefore sustained.
# C_2012287EN.01004102.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/41

---

Action brought on 20 July 2012 — ZZ and ZZ v Commission

(Case F-75/12)

2012/C 287/76

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action for annulment of the decisions calculating the entitlement to pension rights, acquired before entry into service with the European Commission, to be credited and, if necessary, the decisions rejecting the complaints submitted by the applicants

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Civil Service Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decisions calculating the entitlement to pension rights, acquired before entry into service with the European Commission, to be credited to them; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions calculating the entitlement to pension rights, acquired before entry into service with the European Commission, to be credited to them;

| — | if necessary, annul the decisions rejecting their complaints and requiring application of the GIP and the actuarial rates in force at the time when they applied to have their pension rights transferred; |
| --- | --- |

—

if necessary, annul the decisions rejecting their complaints and requiring application of the GIP and the actuarial rates in force at the time when they applied to have their pension rights transferred;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Former DLA Aviation director tours operations center

By Leon MooreDLA Aviation Public Affairs

Navy Vice Adm. (retired) Keith Lippert visited the new Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Operations Center May 8, 2019. DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry and Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, Site Director David Gibson gave Lippert a tour of the building and showed him detailed plans for Phase two, which is scheduled to begin late 2020 and be completed in 2022. He also met with senior leadership during his visit. Lippert served as the commander from 1993-1995 when the center was known as Defense General Supply Center.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Operations CenterNavy Vice Adm. (retired) Keith LippertDLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda HurryDefense Supply Center RichmondVirginiaSite Director David GibsonDefense General Supply Center
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

(SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



I, Noel J. Guillama, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Quantum Group, Inc. for the quarter ended July 31, 2007;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.





Date: September 18, 2007



/s/Noel J. Guillama

Noel J. Guillama

President and Chief Executive Officer
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

51–250 2009

[ERRATA] 

HEARING ON COMMITTEE FUNDING 

FOR THE 111TH CONGRESS (CONT’D) 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE 

ADMINISTRATION 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, FEBRUARY 25, 2009 

Printed for the use of the Committee on House Administration 

( 

Available on the Internet: 

http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/house/administration/index.html 

bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with HEARING

ERRATA 

The title page of the hearing transcript from the February 25, 

2009 hearing held before the Committee on House Administration 

was printed with the incorrect date. The correct hearing date was 

February 25, 2009 and cont’d was added to the title. 

bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with HEARING
Exhibit
            10.3

           

          

        

         

        January
          8, 2007

      

       

      Reference
        is hereby made to the Consulting Agreement between the undersigned and the
        related option grant letter (collectively, the "Agreement").

      


      The
        undersigned hereby agree to terminate the Agreement effective as of 31 December,
        2007, with the exception of Articles 5 (Confidentiality), 6 (Intellectual
        Property Rights), and 9 (Competitive Activity, Non-Solicitation) to the
        Consulting Agreement, which shall remain in effect in accordance with their
        terms. 

      


      The
        undersigned further agree that any rights accruing under the Agreement up
        until
        the date of termination shall remain in effect, while all other rights shall
        be
        deemed terminated immediately. 

      


      To
        the
        extent that the Agreement provided for compensation or options upon the
        accomplishment of milestones, referred to in the Agreement as "Targets",
        and in
        recognition of the fact that Akis Ltd. may already have begun making efforts
        in
        respect thereof, it is agreed that such Targets shall be taken into
        consideration by the Parties in negotiating an agreement pursuant to which
        it is
        contemplated that Avi Kostelitz shall be hired as the Company's
        CEO.

      


       

      


      
        	
                Akis
                  Ltd.

              	
                Traceguard
                  Technologies, Ltd.

              
	 	 
	 	 
	
                By:
                  /s/Avi Kostelitz

              	
                By:
                  /s/ David Ben-Yair 

              
	
                Name:Avi
                  Kostelitz

              	
                Name:
                  David Ben-Yair

              
	
                Title:
                  Chief Executive Officer

              	
                Title:
                  Chief Financial Officer

              
	 	 
	 	 
	
                 

              	
                Traceguard
                  Technologies, Inc.

              
	 	 
	 	 
	
                /s/Avi
                  Kostelitz

              	
                By:
                  /s/ David Ben-Yair

              
	
                Avi
                  Kostelitz

              	
                Name:
                  David Ben-Yair

              
	
                 

              	
                Title:
                  Chief Financial Officer

              


      

      


       

      

        330
          Madison Avenue, 9th
          fl, New
          York, NY 10017 TL: 646-495-5277

          www.traceguard.com  

        Confidencial
No. 45278.

#### Petitions 6047-R, etc., of New York Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

The petitions were dismissed.