28728 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 22, 2007 / Notices 

revised the Facility Operating Licenses 

and Technical Specifications. 

Date of initial notice in Federal 

Register: March 28, 2007 (72 FR 

14623). 

The Commission’s related evaluation 

of the amendments is contained in a 

Safety Evaluation dated April 27, 2007. 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

Union Electric Company, Docket No. 

50–483, Callaway Plant, Unit 1, 

Callaway County, Missouri 

Date of application for amendment: 

June 7, 2006. 

Brief description of amendment: The 

amendment deleted Required Action 

D.1.2 in Technical Specification (TS) 

3.7.10, ‘‘Control Room Emergency 

Ventilation System (CREVS),’’ and 

Required Action C.1.2 in TS 3.7.11, 

‘‘Control Room Air Conditioning System 

(CRACS).’’ For TS 3.7.13, ‘‘Emergency 

Exhaust System (EES),’’ the amendment 

also deletes the phrase ‘‘in MODE 1, 2, 

3, or 4’’ from Condition A (one EES train 

inoperable) and revised Condition D to 

state the following: ‘‘Required Action 

and associated Completion Time of 

Condition A not met during movement 

of irradiated fuel assemblies in the fuel 

building.’’

Date of issuance: May 9, 2007. 

Effective date: As of its date of 

issuance and shall be implemented 

within 90 days from the date of 

issuance. 

Amendment No.: 184. 

Facility Operating License No. NPF–

30: The amendment revised the 

Operating License and Technical 

Specifications. 

Date of initial notice in Federal 

Register: August 1, 2006 (71 FR 43536) 

The Commission’s related evaluation 

of the amendment is contained in a 

Safety Evaluation dated May 9, 2007. 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

Virginia Electric and Power Company, et 

al., Docket Nos. 50–280 and 50–281, 

Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2, 

Surry County, Virginia 

Date of application for amendments: 

January 31, 2007. 

Brief Description of amendments: 

These amendments revised the 

Technical Specification surveillance 

requirements for addressing a missed 

surveillance, and is consistent with the 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

approved Revision 6 of Technical 

Specification Task Force (TSTF) 

Standard Technical Specifications 

Change Traveler TSTF–358, ‘‘Missed 

Surveillance Requirements.’’

Date of issuance: May 3, 2007. 

Effective date: As of date of issuance 

and shall be implemented within 30 

days. 

Amendment Nos.: 253, 252. 

Renewed Facility Operating License 

Nos. DPR–32 and DPR–37: Amendments 

changed the licenses and the technical 

specifications. 

Date of initial notice in Federal 

Register: February 27, 2007 (72 FR 

8806). 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

The Commission’s related evaluation 

of the amendments is contained in a 

Safety Evaluation dated May 3, 2007. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day 

of May, 2007. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Timothy McGinty, 

Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. E7–9523 Filed 5–21–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Draft Supplements to Revision 9 of 

NUREG–1021, ‘‘Operator 

LicensingExamination Standards for 

Power Reactors,’’ and to Revision 2 of 

NUREG–1122 [and –1123] ‘‘Knowledge 

and Abilities Catalog for Nuclear 

Power Plant Operators: Pressurized 

[Boiling] Water Reactors’’

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed supplements 

for public comment. 

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) has issued for public 

comment draft supplements to Revision 

9 of NUREG–1021, ‘‘Operator Licensing 

Examination Standards for Power 

Reactors,’’ and to Revision 2 of NUREG–

1122 [and –1123] ‘‘Knowledge and 

Abilities Catalog for Nuclear Power 

Plant Operators: Pressurized [Boiling] 

Water Reactors.’’ These NUREGs 

provide policy and guidance for the 

development, administration, and 

grading of examinations used for 

licensing operators at nuclear power 

plants pursuant to the Commission’s 

regulations in 10 CFR Part 55, 

‘‘Operators’’ Licenses.’’ NUREG–1021 

also provides guidance for maintaining 

operators’ licenses, and for the NRC to 

conduct requalification examinations, 

when necessary. 

The draft supplement to Revision 9 of 

NUREG–1021 includes a number of 

minor changes that are intended to: (1) 

Clarify licensed operator medical 

requirements, including the use of 

prescription medications; (2) clarify the 

use of surrogate operators during 

dynamic simulator scenarios; (3) clarify 

the selection process for generic 

knowledge and ability (K/A) statements; 

(4) qualify the NRC review of postexamination comments; (5) provide 

additional guidance for maintaining an 

active license (watchstander 

proficiency) and license reactivation; 

and (6) conform with proposed updates 

to NUREGs–1122 and –1123, which are 

concurrently available for public 

comment. The proposed changes are 

summarized in the Record of Proposed 

Changes, and identified by highlight/ 

redline and strikeouts. 

The draft supplements to NUREGs–

1122 and –1123 propose to reword and 

reorganize Section 2, ‘‘Generic 

Knowledge and Abilities,’’ and add a 

new K/A topic to Section 4, 

‘‘Emergency/Abnormal Plant 

Evolutions,’’ to address generator 

voltage and electric grid disturbances. 

The proposed changes are summarized 

in the Record of Changes, and identified 

by highlight/redline and strikeouts. 

Availability: The draft supplements 

are available electronically via the 

NRC’s Public Electronic Reading Room 

(http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/doccomment.html) and in the NRC’s Public 

Document Room located at 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. If 

you do not have electronic access to 

NRC documents, single copies of the 

draft supplements are available upon 

request, by contacting David S. Muller 

by phone at (301) 415–1412 or by e-mail 

at dsm3@nrc.gov. 

DATES: Comments must be provided by 

July 23, 2007. Comments received after 

this date will be considered if 

practicable to do so, but only those 

comments received on or before the due 

date can be assured consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments 

to the Chief, Rules, Directives, and 

Editing Branch, Division of 

Administrative Services, Office of 

Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Mail Stop T6–D59, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001, and 

specify the report number in your 

comments. You may also provide 

comments via the NRC’s Public 

Electronic Reading Room by following 

the instructions at http://www.nrc.gov/ 

public-involve/doc-comment/form.html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David S. Muller, Operator Licensing and 

Human Performance Branch, Office of 

Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–001. Telephone: 

(301) 415–1412; e-mail: dsm3@nrc.gov. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 98 / Tuesday, May 22, 2007 / Notices 28729 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day 

of May 2007. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Nancy L. Salgado, 

Chief, Operator Licensing and Human 

Performance Branch, Division of Inspection 

and Regional Support, Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. E7–9848 Filed 5–21–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

[Docket No. NAFTA/DS–USA–Mex–2007–

2008–01] 

NAFTA Dispute Settlement Proceeding 

by Mexico Regarding U.S. Measures 

Affecting Sweetener Trade With 

Mexico and Related NAFTA Dispute 

Settlement 

AGENCY: Office of the United States 

Trade Representative. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The Office of the United 

States Trade Representative (USTR) is 

providing notice that on March 15, 

2007, Mexico requested consultations, 

under Article 2006 of the North 

American Free Trade Agreement 

(‘‘NAFTA’’), regarding certain U.S. 

measures, proposed measures, and 

actions alleged to be affecting the 

markets for sugar, syrup goods and high 

fructose corn syrup or alleged to be 

inconsistent with NAFTA dispute 

settlement obligations. USTR invites 

written comments from the public 

concerning the issues raised in this 

dispute. 

DATES: Although USTR will accept any 

comments received during the course of 

the consultations, comments should be 

submitted on or before June 4, 2007 to 

be assured of timely consideration by 

USTR. 

ADDRESSES: Comments should be 

submitted (i) electronically, to 

FR0710@ustr.eop.gov, with ‘‘U.S. Sugar 

Measures (USA–Mex–2007–2008–01)’’

in the subject line, or (ii) by fax, to 

Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–3640, with 

a confirmation copy sent electronically 

to the electronic mail address above, in 

accordance with the requirements for 

submission set out below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy A. Karpel, Assistant General 

Counsel, Office of the United States 

Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, 

NW., Washington, DC (202) 395–3150. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is 

providing notice that Mexico has 

requested consultations pursuant to 

Chapter Twenty of the NAFTA 

‘‘Institutional Arrangements and 

Dispute Settlement Procedures’’

(Chapter Twenty). 

Major Issues Raised by Mexico 

On March 15, 2007, Mexico requested 

consultations with the United States 

regarding certain U.S. measures, 

proposed measures, and actions alleged 

to be affecting the markets for sugar, 

syrup goods and high fructose corn 

syrup or alleged to be inconsistent with 

NAFTA dispute settlement obligations. 

The measures at issue include, but are 

not limited to: (i) The alleged refusal of 

the United States to grant Mexican 

origin sugar access to the U.S. market in 

accordance with the provisions of 

Annex 703.2 and (ii) the alleged U.S. 

declining to appoint panelists and 

otherwise refusing to cooperate in the 

establishment of a panel and the 

operation of the dispute settlement 

mechanism of Chapter Twenty. 

Mexico cites to the provisions of 

Chapters Three, Seven and Twenty of 

the NAFTA relating to trade in sugar, 

syrup goods and high fructose corn 

syrup. 

Public Comment: Requirements for 

Submissions 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments concerning 

the issues raised in the dispute. 

Comments should be submitted (i) 

electronically, to FR0710@ustr.eop.gov, 

with ‘‘U.S. Sugar Measures (USA–Mex–

2007–2008–01)’’ in the subject line, or 

(ii) by fax, to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 

395–3640, with a confirmation copy 

sent electronically to the electronic mail 

address above. 

USTR encourages the submission of 

documents in Adobe PDF format as 

attachments to an electronic mail. 

Interested persons who make 

submissions by electronic mail should 

not provide separate cover letters; 

information that might appear in a cover 

letter should be included in the 

submission itself. Similarly, to the 

extent possible, any attachments to the 

submission should be included in the 

same file as the submission itself, and 

not as separate files. 

Comments must be in English. A 

person requesting that information 

contained in a comment submitted by 

that person be treated as confidential 

business information must certify that 

such information is business 

confidential and would not customarily 

be released to the public by the 

submitter. Confidential business 

information must be clearly designated 

as such and ‘‘Business Confidential’’

must be marked at the top and bottom 

of the cover page and each succeeding 

page. Persons who submit confidential 

business information are encouraged 

also to provide a non-confidential 

summary of the information. 

Information or advice contained in a 

comment submitted, other than business 

confidential information, may be 

determined by USTR to be confidential 

in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of 

the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that 

information or advice may qualify as 

such, the submitter—

(1) Must clearly so designate the 

information or advice; 

(2) Must clearly mark the material as 

‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the 

top and bottom of the cover page and 

each succeeding page; and 

(3) Is encouraged to provide a nonconfidential summary of the 

information or advice. 

USTR will maintain a file on this 

dispute settlement proceeding, 

accessible to the public, in the USTR 

Reading Room, which is located at 1724 

F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508. 

The public file will include nonconfidential comments received by 

USTR from the public with respect to 

the dispute; if an arbitral panel is 

convened, the U.S. submissions, the 

submissions or non-confidential 

summaries of submissions received 

from other participants in the dispute; 

and the report of the panel. The USTR 

Reading Room is open to the public, by 

appointment only, from 10 a.m. to noon 

and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday. An appointment to review the 

public file (Docket NAFTA/DS–USA–

Mex–2007–2008–01 U.S. Sugar 

Measures Dispute) may be made by 

calling the USTR Reading Room at (202) 

395–6186. 

Daniel Brinza, 

Assistant United States Trade Representative 

for Monitoring and Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 07–2554 Filed 5–21–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190–W7–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meetings 

NAME OF AGENCY: Postal Regulatory 

Commission 

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 

at 10 a.m. 

PLACE: Commission conference room, 

901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, 

Washington, DC 20268–0001. 

STATUS: Closed. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Personnel 

matters—selection of Inspector General. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES