alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the                  Report                  fairly presents,                  in                  all material respects,                  the financial condition and results of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                  |                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                  |                                      |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                  | /s/                Lawrence Lok Yuen-Ming |
|   | Lawrence                  Lok Yuen-MingChief                  Financial Officer(Principal                  Financial Officer)Date:                  February 14, 2006 |

----
# C_2012287EN.01003701.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/37

---

Action brought on 1 August 2012 — Klizli v Council

(Case T-336/12)

2012/C 287/67

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Yousef Klizli (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: Z. Garkova-Lyutskanova, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council implementing Decision 2012/256/CFSP of 14 May 2012 implementing Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ L 126, p. 9), insofar as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council implementing Decision 2012/256/CFSP of 14 May 2012 implementing Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ L 126, p. 9), insofar as it concerns the applicant;

| — | Annul Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 410/2012 of 14 May 2012 implementing Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (JO L 126, p. 3), insofar as it concerns the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 410/2012 of 14 May 2012 implementing Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (JO L 126, p. 3), insofar as it concerns the applicant; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging






  — | that the applicant was wrongfully enlisted as a person who provides financial support to the regime. |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging

—

that the applicant was wrongfully enlisted as a person who provides financial support to the regime.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging






  — | that the contested Council’s acts were issued in the absence of any legal basis and infringe the duty to state reasons, the right to a fair hearing, the right to an effective judicial protection and the right to property; further they are in breach of the principle of proportionality and violate the applicant’s good name. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging

—

that the contested Council’s acts were issued in the absence of any legal basis and infringe the duty to state reasons, the right to a fair hearing, the right to an effective judicial protection and the right to property; further they are in breach of the principle of proportionality and violate the applicant’s good name.

---
No. 48846.

#### Protests 34741-K, etc., of Copeland Shipping Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 120]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3478]]

Public Law 111-120
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend through December 31, 2010, the authority of the Secretary of 
 the Army to accept and expend funds contributed by non-Federal public 
    entities to expedite the processing of permits. <<NOTE: Dec. 22, 
                         2009 -  [H.R. 4165]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

    Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33 
U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 119 Stat. 2169; 120 Stat. 318; 120 
Stat. 3197; 121 Stat. 1067) is amended by striking ``2009'' and 
inserting ``2010''.

    Approved December 22, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4165:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Dec. 8, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# People and Culture recruits at OSU 2019 Spring Career Fair

By Craig WhiteDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime participated in the OSU 2019 Spring Career Fair at The Ohio State University Jan. 29. 

Employers were offered the opportunity to meet high-caliber undergraduate students seeking internships. 

More than 50 potential applicants visited the DLA booth over the four-hour period. 

Attendees were interested in the student internships as well as the recent graduate full-time employment opportunities in general supply, product testing, contracting, human resources, information technology and finance. 

Students visiting the booth had backgrounds such as international studies, political science, history, business, criminology/law enforcement, biology, economics and logistics.

For more information on opportunities with DLA, check out DLA’s employment programs.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Careers L&MCulture L&MDLA L&MPACER/Intern L&MResource the Enterprise L&MPeople & Culture L&M
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

bl’. 

Hon. Ii. X. Hodges 

County kudltor 

';filliamaon County 

Georgetown, Texas 

Dear Slrt 

May 11, 1939 

oalved the at 

alre to know 

JannarY eo,l 

onstable in en ever a5?m$~, rho 

44 bada and who reaaiv48 8 

anothar aountp, to b 4 sex?vml in 

ishould, upon tha re+ipt ef a 

ieat fr4Bl th4 foreign 44unty, 

out or the Offlaerle Salary Ftind oi 

his native muuty.m .: ..I 

In oonneatlon ulth the above opinion, tha4 was 

forw4rd4d to you a oopy of our opinion Ho. O-USa randerad 

under data of January 89th. to FIon..X. Pre+aokl, bounty 

Auditor; Wteston bounty,~Tma8, 8ubstantlally to the 8awm 
Hon. R. A. Hodges, Eay 11, 1939, PaKe 2 

effect. 

". 

As we understand the question, while your 

precinct officers are on a fee basis, your county officars are on a salary basis, thereby creating tithin your 

county an Offic4rVs Salary Fund. It nedessarily follows 

that any subpoenas or processes issuing out of fslony 

cases pending within your own oounty, when served by 

the con&able, he would be paid from the Ofilcar*s Salary 

Fund. 

& the opinion of&W. Alsup, dated February 

l.2, 193f3, to whloh reiarenaa WM made In our opinion wo. 

O-lSS, ha very plainly pointed out that under tha salary 

law, Senate Bill l?o. 5, and particular4 ths 1aWer part 

of Saotlon 17b of said bill, 441~4 appearing In Veraon*a 

Be-46 CiVfl Statute8 1985, M brtiOl4 S932+10~). th4 

Legfslatura lntendad to wlthdrarull f444 tharatefere 

paid by th4 St&a of Taxaa ror aerriobe randd by 

olnotoffloerm andthatthaymmld ba thereaftar 

ybout of the OttIaer*s Salaq Fund Of tha wUntxc. p"' OW(Ic4,tha amooatpaid to a ooaatabla for the 4~44ation of 

anoutof oountyproo4wua4 a ahargsup4nth4 &ala. 

Th4 Lagl~laturs did not Baa fit to m6ka qy eraaptloa aa 

FtiEfztiauoh aerrioea to be pld out OS out of oountr 

This 44rdo4 would no doubtba mn8ldemd 

oa4 randarad*ror the stat4 rathar than for t?.~o foreign 

bounty, Thita Dep8rtwnt haretoforo hakrulad that th4 

onaotmmt of Senate Bill Bo. 6, m&n% 'and It& awndmnt8, 

j.n suahosnes mqeraeded tha payment of suah Weas by tha 

atate. uhl14 th4 data has appropriation6 rar,pwing 

orfioare in a oounty operating on a tee bade, thi 8tate 

-at the same time has nrada 5 prori.alon ior (111 apportionmnt 

to war& tha salary fund of thoaa oouatlaa out of rhioh 

said is44 4r4 to be paid. (940. 6, Senate Bill d). 

w4 r44p44trulip advisa tharafors, and it i4 th4 

opinion of thie Depa.rtm4nt that our opinion O-lfX& tormr4 

rendered to you undar date of January e0, 1999, is applimbla 
Hon. H. A. Hodges, May 11, 1939, Page 3 

C~ 

and covers the question contain&d in your lettar of 

April 17, 1939, which is above sat forth. 

Very truly yours
Exhibit 32.1

     Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of   WealthCraft   Systems  Inc.
("WealthCraft")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kelly Jay Michael
Tallas,  Chief Executive  Officer of WealthCraft,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                                /s/ Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name: Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                                Date: November 13, 2008
No. 96-7969.

#### McTeer *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA saves money, resources

By Airman 1st Class Michael X. Beyer355th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

                DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz.   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Davis-Monthan Air Force Basehazardous materialsdispositiondisposalrevitalizationreusesurplus equipmentComputers For LearningLaw Enforcement Support Office
No. 96-291.

#### Wing, Acting Commissioner, New York Department of Social Services *v.*James Square Nursing Home, Inc.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2013046EN.01003204.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/32

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 December 2012 — AD v Commission

(Case F-117/12)

(Civil service - Lateness - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 46/66

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AD (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision not to grant diplomatic status to the applicant’s partner and the decision not to pay certain travel costs for that partner, and a claim for damages

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | AD shall bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

AD shall bear his own costs.

---
132 STAT. 2892 PUBLIC LAW 115–241—SEPT. 18, 2018 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5385 (S. 2597): 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

July 23, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 4, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–241 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program of payments 

to children’s hospitals that operate graduate medical education programs, and 

for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dr. Benjy Frances Brooks Children’s Hospital GME Support Reauthorization Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN’S HOSPITALS THAT 

OPERATE GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS. 

Section 340E of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256e) 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and each of fiscal years 

2014 through 2018,’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2014 

through 2018, and each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023,’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)(3)(D), by inserting ‘‘and the end of 

fiscal year 2022,’’ after ‘‘fiscal year 2018,’’; and 

(3) in subsection (f)— 

(A) in paragraph (1)(A)— 

(i) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and inserting 

a semicolon; 

(ii) in clause (v), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(iii) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(vi) for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023, 

$105,000,000.’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (2)— 

(i) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘; and’’ and 

inserting a semicolon; 

(ii) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period 

at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(iii) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(F) for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023, 

$220,000,000.’’. 

Approved September 18, 2018. 

42 USC 201 note. 

Dr. Benjy 

Frances Brooks 

Children’s 

Hospital GME 

Support 

Reauthorization 

Act of 2018. 

Sept. 18, 2018 

[H.R. 5385] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
No. 40487.

#### Protests 955498-G (A), etc., of Wm. Adams, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2013101EN.01000703.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova (Italy) lodged on 24 December 2012 — Dresser Rand SA v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale Ufficio Controlli

(Case C-607/12)

2013/C 101/15

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dresser Rand SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale Ufficio Controlli

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the transfer of goods to Italy from another Member State for the purpose of verifying whether those goods may be adapted to other goods acquired within Italy, without anything being done to the goods brought into Italy, come within the notion of ‘work on the goods’ referred to in Article 17(2)(f) of Directive 2006/112/EC (1) and, in this connection, is it appropriate to assess the nature of the transactions which took place between F.B. ITMI and DR-IT? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the transfer of goods to Italy from another Member State for the purpose of verifying whether those goods may be adapted to other goods acquired within Italy, without anything being done to the goods brought into Italy, come within the notion of ‘work on the goods’ referred to in Article 17(2)(f) of Directive 2006/112/EC (1) and, in this connection, is it appropriate to assess the nature of the transactions which took place between F.B. ITMI and DR-IT?

1

| 2. | Is Article 17(2)(f) of Directive 2006/112/EC to be interpreted as precluding the Member States from providing in their legislation or practices that the dispatch or transport of goods is not to be treated as a transfer to another Member State except on condition that the goods are returned to the Member State from which they were initially dispatched or transported? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is Article 17(2)(f) of Directive 2006/112/EC to be interpreted as precluding the Member States from providing in their legislation or practices that the dispatch or transport of goods is not to be treated as a transfer to another Member State except on condition that the goods are returned to the Member State from which they were initially dispatched or transported?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
No. 49460.

#### Protests 69016-G, etc., of Eastern Grocery Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Oy Wo Tong*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) merchandise found to be crude drugs was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 and the drugs advanced in value were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as claimed.
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/healthyliving/healthyeating/finding-balance-obesity.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/healthyliving/healthyeating/finding-balance-obesity.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### Charles W. SHERBONDY and Gail Strickland Sherbondy v. SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, d/b/a Sunrise Homes.

No. 98-CC-0814.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 8, 1998.

In re Sunrise Construction/Dev.; Sunrise Homes;—Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 2672; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 97-10150.

Denied. Applicant may reraise in the event of an adverse judgment.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.