alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# FY18 Log21 Selectees

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Congratulations to the FY18 Log21 Selectees. 

Nine associates from DLA Land and Maritime will attend the Institute for Defense and Business (IDB) throughout this year. 

The selectees are: 
                              -     Joseph Boling    
                              - Gabriel Santiago    
                              - Jackey Foster    
                              - James Davis    
                              - Christine Demos    
                              - Jamieson Duvall    
                              - Felicia Mann    
                              - Marizela Marin-Giraud    

Congratulations on your selection!

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCulture L&MCommunity L&MResource the Enterprise L&MPeople & Culture L&M
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Rim Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ended April 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. Norman,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 27, 2003                     /s/ F. John Norman
                                    -----------------------
                                    F. John Norman
                                    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-41034

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAFAEL GONZALEZ-DE LEON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-348-2

Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rafael Gonzalez-De Leon appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea

conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C). De Leon argues that the district court erred

in sentencing him because it used the gross weight of the marijuana, including

its packaging, to determine the applicable base offense level. De Leon contends

that if the district court had applied the typical reduction for packaging, his

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 29, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-41034

2

advisory sentencing range might have been less than the sentence actually

imposed. 

A district court’s determination of the amount of drugs attributable to a

defendant for sentencing purposes is a finding of fact that this court generally

reviews for clear error. United States v. Posada-Rios, 158 F.3d 832, 878 (5th Cir.

1998). However, Rodriguez-De Leon did not dispute in the district court the

drug quantity used to calculate his base offense level. Thus, plain error review

applies. United States v. Sparks, 2 F.3d 574, 589 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Rodriguez-De Leon has not shown that the district court committed any

error, plain or otherwise, in determining the drug quantity for sentencing

purposes. Rodriguez-De Leon did not present any evidence to refute the PSR’s

finding that he was responsible for more than 60 kilograms of marijuana. There

was no evidence in the record concerning the net weight of the marijuana, and

Rodriguez-De Leon did not present any competent evidence to refute the PSR’s

quantity attribution (e.g., the actual or estimated weight of the packaging).

Rodriguez-De Leon specifically failed to show that the difference between the

gross weight and the net weight of the drugs exceeded 5.45 kilograms (i.e., the

amount necessary to affect his offense level). Given the absence of contrary

evidence concerning the proper drug quantity, the district court was entitled to

make its drug quantity calculation without further inquiry. See United States

v. Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d 929, 943 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, Rodriguez-De

Leon has failed to establish that the district court committed error of any type.

See id.; Sparks, 2 F.3d at 589. 

AFFIRMED.
Skip       to contentSocial Security OnlineHistoryhttp://www.socialsecurity.gov/Home  |  Questions?  |  Contact       UsSearch  History HomeThis is an       archival or historical document and may not reflect current policies or       proceduresReports & StudiesGreenspan Commission
REPORT OF THENATIONAL COMMISSIONONSOCIAL SECURITY       REFORM

JANUARY 1983       

The National Commission on Social Security Reform (informally known as       the Greenspan Commission after its Chairman) was appointed by the Congress       and the President in 1981 to study and make recommendations regarding the       short-term financing crisis that Social Security faced at that time.       Estimates were that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund would       run out of money possibly as early as August 1983. This bipartisan       Commission was to make recommendations to Congress on how to solve the       problems facing Social Security. Their report, issued in January 1983,       became the basis for the 1983 Social Security Amendments which resolved       the short-term financing problem and made many other significant changes       in Social Security law.
Basic Report:Members             of the National CommissionLetter             of Transmittal to The PresidentChapter             1- IntroductionChapter             2- Findings and RecommendationsChapter             3- Financing Problems of the Medicare ProgramChapter             4- Additional StatementsAppendices:
A.             Executive Order 12335 Establishing the NCSSR and Executive Orders             12397 and 12402 Modifying the Reporting Date

B.             President's Remarks Announcing the Establishment of the NCSSR

C.             Charter of the NCSSR

D.             President's Letter to the Chairman and the Commission Members

E.             List of Meetings of the NCSSR

F.             List of Staff Memorandums Prepared for the NCSSR

G.             Papers presented to the NCSSR

H.             Staff of NCSSR

I.             Glossary

J.             Financial Status of the Social Security Program

K.             "Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance and Hospital Insurance             Programs -- Actuarial Cost Estimates for OASDI and HI and for             Various Possible Changes in OASDI and Historical Data for OASDI and             HI", Background Book, revised version, December 1982.
Privacy Policy | Website Policies       & Other Important Information | Site MapNeed Larger       Text?
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Defense Acquisition Regulations System

          - 48 CFR Part 232

# AGENCY:

Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Request for public input.

# SUMMARY:

DoD is conducting a review of the Department's contract financing policies. As part of this review, DoD would like to hear the views of interested parties regarding the effectiveness of the financing policies presently used for DoD contracts.

# DATES:

Submit written comments to the address shown below on or before July 23, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit comments to: Office of the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, ATTN: OUSD                               ( print page 28664)                            (AT&L) DPAP (CPF), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Comments also may be submitted by facsimile at (703) 602-7887, or by e-mail at                         *John.McPherson@osd.mil.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. John McPherson, by telephone at (703) 602-0296, or by e-mail at                         *John.McPherson@osd.mil.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

DoD policies on contract financing are described in Part 32 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Part 232 of the Defense FAR Supplement. These policies cover a variety of contract finance issues, including non-commercial item purchase financing; commercial item purchase financing; loan guarantees for defense production; advance payments for noncommercial items; progress payments based on costs; contract debts; contract funding; assignment of claims; prompt payment; performance-based payments; electronic funds transfer; electronic submission and processing of payment requests; and levies on contract payments.

DoD is interested in receiving public input on these contract financing policies, particularly with regard to those that are considered to be especially effective or ineffective, along with supporting rationale.

Michele P. Peterson,

Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

[FR Doc. E7-9751 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 100 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 29147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9992]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TS07-5-000]


Neptune Regional Transmission System; Notice of Request for 
Exemption

May 17, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 10, 2007, Neptune Regional Transmission 
System filed a request for exemption from standards of conduct, 
pursuant to Part 358 of the Commission's regulations and Order No. 
2004.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. On or before the comment date, it is 
not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons 
other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#14525146575b7a787d7a71476164647b666054727166773a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="71373423323e1f1d181f14220401011e030531171403125f161e07">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 11, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9992 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.41

October 25,
2001

Richard
Leong
Houston, TX

CONFIDENTIAL

Dear
Rich:

As
discussed, Universal Compression, Inc. ("Company") has agreed to extend the following benefits to you if you are involuntarily terminated by the Company for any reason other
than Cause (as defined below) during the three (3) year period commencing on your effective date of employment:



For
purposes of this Agreement, Cause shall mean (a) any criminal act, (b) any misconduct (including but not limited to, a positive illegal drug test result),
(c) any nonperformance of your duties, (d) any acts of insubordination, or (e) any acts of dishonesty.

Notwithstanding
the above, the Company's obligation to make any payments under this Agreement will be contingent upon your execution of a release and waiver of any and all claims against
the Company.

If
this Agreement represents our understanding, please execute below my signature.

|Agreed: | /s/STEPHEN A. SNIDERStephen A. Snider |  | Date: | 10/25/01
|------- | ------------------------------------- |  | ----- | --------
|        |                                       |  |       |         
|Agreed: | /s/RICHARD LEONGRichard Leong         |  | Date: | 10/30/01

---

QuickLinks
#### A. & M. Karagheusian, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6524.

Entry No. 738313.

Invoice dated London, England, March 1945.

Certified March 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 2, 1945.

(Decided November 18, 1946)

*Joseph F. Lockett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): This appeal for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concerns the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of .the United Kingdom entitled, “Einanee (No. 2) Act of 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

An agreed set of facts shows export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the carpets in question are the appraised values less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1705 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1705

   To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 
 Spokane, Washington, as the ``Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans 
                       Affairs Medical Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 13, 2011

  Mrs. Murray (for herself and Ms. Cantwell) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in 
 Spokane, Washington, as the ``Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans 
                       Affairs Medical Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MANN-GRANDSTAFF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center 
in Spokane, Washington, shall after the date of the enactment of this 
Act be known and designated as the ``Mann-Grandstaff Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States to the medical 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 
Center.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015414EN.01000201.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 6 de Bilbao — Spain) — Grupo Hospitalario Quirón SA v Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco, Instituto de Religiosas Siervas de Jesús de la Caridad

(Case C-552/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public service contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 23(2) - Management of public health services - Provision of health services under the remit of public hospitals in private establishments - Requirement that the services be provided in a particular municipality))

(2015/C 414/02)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 6 de Bilbao

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Grupo Hospitalario Quirón SA

Applicant:

Defendants: Departamento de Sanidad del Gobierno Vasco, Instituto de Religiosas Siervas de Jesús de la Caridad

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 23(2) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts precludes a requirement, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, expressed as a technical specification in public procurement notices relating to the provision of health services, whereby the medical services that are the subject of the calls for tenders must be provided by private hospital establishments situated exclusively within a given municipality, which is not necessarily that in which the patients concerned by those services reside, where that requirement involves the automatic exclusion of tenderers who cannot provide those services in such an establishment situated within that municipality but who satisfy all the other conditions of those calls for tenders.

---

(1)  OJ C 24, 25.1.2014.

1

---
# C_2014112EN.01003302.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/33

---

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2014 — Sothys Auriac v OHIM — Grand Hotel Primavera (BEAUTY GARDEN)

(Case T-470/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of that application - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 112/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sothys Auriac (Auriac, France) (represented by: A. Berthet, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Grand Hotel Primavera SA (Borgo Maggiore, San Marino)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 July 2012 (Case R 1419/2011-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Grand Hotel Primavera SA and Sothys Auriac.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---