alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014448EN.01001801.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2014 — FIS'D v Commission

(Case T-283/12) (1)

1

((Erasmus Mundus action programme - Framework partnership agreement - Specific grant agreement - EACEA decision to rescind the framework agreement and amend the specific agreement - Administrative appeal before the Commission - Commission decision dismissing the administrative appeal as unfounded - Infringement of the agreements and the administrative and financial manual))

(2014/C 448/23)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FIS’D — Formazione integrata superiore del design (Catanzaro, Italy) (represented by: initially, S. Bariatti and A. Sodano, then, F. Sutti and A. Boso Caretta, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, M. Van Hoof, then, C. Cattabriga and D. Roussanov and finally, C. Cattabriga, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) (represented by: H. Monet, acting as Agent, M. Merola and C. Santacroce, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission decision of 12 April 2012 (ref. Ares (2012) 446225) dismissing the administrative appeal against the decision of the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) of 13 January 2012 by which the latter rescinded early the framework partnership agreement 2011/0181 which it had concluded with the Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria (Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria, Italy) and amended the specific grant agreement which it had concluded with that university

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders FIS’D — Formazione integrata superiore del design to bear its own costs and those of the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders FIS’D — Formazione integrata superiore del design to bear its own costs and those of the European Commission.

| 3. | Orders the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 31.4 CERTIFICATION  I, J. Michael Anderson, certify that:  1.             I have reviewed this transition report on Form 10-K
of Universal Compression, Inc. (the registrant);  2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.             The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;  b)[RESERVED]  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.             The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.   Date:   March
  3, 2006
  /s/ J. Michael AndersonName:
  J. Michael AndersonTitle:
  Chief Financial Officer
123 STAT. 3012 PUBLIC LAW 111–100—NOV. 30, 2009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1516: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Apr. 21, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–100 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 37926 

Church Street in Dade City, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus Mathes Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT MARCUS MATHES POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 37926 Church Street in Dade City, Florida, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus Mathes 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Marcus Mathes Post Office’’. 

Approved November 30, 2009. 

Nov. 30, 2009 

[H.R. 1516] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
# C_2013178EN.01001001.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2013 — Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik v OHIM — Impexmetal (IKFŁT KRAŚNIK)

(Case T-19/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark IKFŁT KRAŚNIK - Earlier Community figurative mark FŁT - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 178/17

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A. (Kraśnik, Poland) (represented by: J. Sieklucki, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Impexmetal S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: W. Trybowski and K. Pyszków, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 October 2011 (Case R 2475/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Impexmetal S.A. and Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.

1

---
Case Wo. 8,684.

#### In re McCARTY.

[5 Law Rep. 322.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Aug., 1842.

Bankruptcy — False Inventory — Evi dence— Practice.

[In the matter of John Q. McCarty, a bankrupt.]

The case was heard on objections and proofs reported by a commissioner.

A. G. Rogers, for bankrupt.

H. Holden, for creditor.

THE COURT

decided, that the only matter involved in the objections that the bankrupt had not made a true inventory of his property was the fact of his actual condition at the time his application was made. That evidence falsifying his allegation, that he casually lost $3,300 in the year 1839, would not be sufficient to disprove the verity of his petition and inventory, without facts or circumstances connecting his possession of the money more directly with the time of his application. Quaere, whether if the creditor examines the bankrupt on oath, to a fact to which he directly testifies, and afterwards discredits his testimony as to particulars bearing upon the fact, he has a right to infer the fact to be contrary to the express assertion of the bankrupt.

*1259THE COUAj. further decided, that an assertion of a fact made by the bankrupt’s wife in his presence, and denied by him, could not be given in evidence to impeach the testimony of the bankrupt.

THE COURT further decided, that a voluntary conveyance of property by an insolvent before the passage of the bankrupt act [of 1841 (o Stat. 440)] to his mother and son-in-law, under circumstances rendering the conveyance void as to creditors, divested all his personal right and interest therein, so that he could not represent it as owned by him, and need not accordingly set it forth in his inventory.
#### May Co. *v.*United States

No. 6855.

Entry No. 390, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, December 12, 1941, etc.

Certified December 13, 1941, etc.

Entered at Cleveland, Ohio, January 20, 1942, etc.

(Decided February 11, 1947)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and ehinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

• Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT
        32
 CERTIFICATION
 OF
 CHIEF
        EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
 CHIEF
        FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
        Michael Chou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
        on Form
        10-QSB of C&D Production Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
        on
        Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.
 
 I,
        Chien-Te Chou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
        on Form
        10-QSB of C&D Production Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
        on
        Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.
 
 Pursuant
        to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
        certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.
  By:
                /s/ Michael
                  ChouMichael
                  ChouChairman
                  of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
                  Secretary
  By:
                /s/ Chien-Te
                  ChouChien-Te
                  ChouChief
                  Financial Officer and Administrative
                  and Financial Manager
 Dated: January
          27, 2006
# C_2012379EN.01002401.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2012 — Oil Turbo Compressor Co. v Council

(Case T-63/12) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Action for annulment - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)

2012/C 379/41

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Oil Turbo Compressor Co. (Private Joint Stock) (Teheran, Iran) (represented by: K. Kleinschmidt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and Z. Kupčová)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP OJ 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), to the extent that it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP OJ 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran in so far as it concerns Oil Turbo Compressor Co. (Private Joint Stock); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP OJ 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran in so far as it concerns Oil Turbo Compressor Co. (Private Joint Stock);

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Oil Turbo Compressor. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Oil Turbo Compressor.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 has been made under my supervision. |

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2016-B |
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBroad Band Effective and Affordable Approaches to ClimateAlthough we have had many decades of projections and warnings about climate change it is, as is all too usual, only fairly recently that actual impacts have stirred serious societal interest in mitigation efforts. Such efforts will involve changes, and changes are always difficult. In fact, although renewable energy is a bedrock mitigation approach, it is only as technology has reduced renewable costs below parity with fossil carbon that they have been taken very seriously. Renewable energy technologies are already producing some 25% of electricity worldwide and constitute some 65% of new generation. It appears that favorable economics motivates change more often than longer term issues. In the case of climate change, it is no longer long term. In fact many indicate we have a decade or less to institute serious mitigation or rather dire impacts are projected. Fortunately humans have invented approaches which would be effective in that decade time frame and be overall economically advantageous.Document ID20180008443Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBushnell, Dennis M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredDecember 14, 2018Publication DateDecember 1, 2018Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TMý2018-220119L-20987NF1676L-32009Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 736446.01.01.07.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180008443.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### William J. Oberle, Inc. (European Agencies Co., Inc.) *v.*United States

No. 6160.

Invoice dated Koln-Mulheim, Germany, August 6, 1936.

Certified August 19, 1936.

Entered at New Orleans, La., October 2, 1936.

Entry No. 968.

(Decided June 4, 1945)

*Philip Stein*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement concerns four reels of ungalvanized crucible cast steel hoisting ropes whose appraised value was approximately 4 per centum higher than the importer’s entered value.

*456When the case was called for trial at New Orleans on March 15, 1945, plaintiff moved for dismissal on the ground there was no proper designation and examination of the merchandise within the requirements of section 499 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1499).

No proof, either oral testimony or documentary evidence, was offered to support the motion, plaintiff relying entirely upon the official papers. An examination thereof discloses nothing to disturb the presumptively correct official appraisement, section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1501).

The motion to dismiss is denied and the appraised value is found to be correct. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 40494.

#### Protests 659698-G, etc., of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 27179, *May*v. *United States*(T. D. 47760), and *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 48573) the balls and tennis rackets in question were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 as claimed.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 53 ) IV-C-1 9 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:53 AM Sheet 53 of 232P. 2

* > -T_

_ \ 8 ^SB- ? IUNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIONAGENCY V^W ^ WASHINGTON , D.C . 2046 0 

### JA N - 4 198

8

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N

Honorabl e Harol d L . Volkme r Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D C 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Volkmer : Than k yo u fo r passing alon g th e comment s o f Mr . To mBoland concerning EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refueling emissio n controls . B e assure d tha t thes e comment s wil l be considere d a s we procee d wit h a fina l decision . W e wil l als o b e placing th e correspondenc e i n the publi c docke t fo r th e Rul e (Docke t No . A-87-11) . Than k yo u agai n fo r you r concer n i n thi s matter .



### Sincerel y vours , ORIGINA LSIGNEDB

Y RICHAR D amiso n 

### Richar dD . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f

Mobil e Source sP. 3

ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N

AGENC Y 

### JA N 

### 2 5 198

8 »yyKgT
No. 55601.

#### Standard Products Co. *v.*United States,

protest 160694-K (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
123 STAT. 3020 PUBLIC LAW 111–108—NOV. 30, 2009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3547: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Oct. 7, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–108 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 936 South 

250 East in Provo, Utah, as the ‘‘Rex E. Lee Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REX E. LEE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 936 South 250 East in Provo, Utah, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Rex E. Lee Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Rex E. Lee Post Office Building’’. 

Approved November 30, 2009. 

Nov. 30, 2009 

[H.R. 3547] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLIC LAWS