alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012331EN.01002701.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/27

---

Action brought on 22 August 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM

(Case T-377/12)

(2012/C 331/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: L. De Brouwer, E. Cornu and É. De Gryse, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Olivar Del Desierto, SL (Almería, Spain)

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 June 2012 in Case R 135/2011-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 June 2012 in Case R 135/2011-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Olivar Del Desierto, SL.

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark comprising the word element ‘OLEOSPA’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 35 and 39 — registration application No 7 268 832.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Benelux word marks ‘SPA’ for goods in Classes 3 and 32

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal upheld and opposition rejected.

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Julianne M. Biagini, the Chief Financial Officer of Endwave Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:





| | 1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated:  November 14, 2002/s/    JULIANNE M. BIAGINIJulianne M. Biagini Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012311EN.01001102.xml

| 13.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/11

---

Action brought on 31 July 2012 — Globosat Programadora v OHIM — Sport TV Portugal (SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL)

(Case T-348/12)

2012/C 311/14

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Globosat Programadora Ltda (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (represented by: S. Micallef, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sport TV Portugal, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 May 2012 in case R 2079/2010-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 May 2012 in case R 2079/2010-4;

| — | Annul all costs orders made against the applicant by the Office, and order the later to bear the costs of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul all costs orders made against the applicant by the Office, and order the later to bear the costs of the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL’, for services in classes 35, 38 and 41 — Community trade mark application No 6915094

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Portuguese trade mark registration No 329507 of the figurative mark ‘SPORTV’, for services in classes 38 and 41

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 and Infringement of Rule 22(3) of Commission Regulation No 2868/95.

Pleas in law:

---
3

for Carry-ons

1

1

TSA’s Travel Tips

Before you go...

Visit www.tsa.gov for all the latest 

security policies

Pack liquids/gels in your checked 

baggage. For a short trip you are 

permitted to carry-on 1 quart-size, clear 

plastic, zip-top bag holding 3 ounce or 

smaller containers of liquids or gels. 

Limited to one bag per traveler. 

Medications and breast milk/baby 

formula are allowed in reasonable 

quantities exceeding 3 ounces and 

are not required to be in a zip-top bag. 

These items must be declared to a 

security officer at the checkpoint.

All footwear must be removed for x-ray 

screening. Wearing footwear that can 

be easily removed is helpful.

Pack valuables such as jewelry, cash 

and electronics, as well as fragile items, 

in your carry-on.

Avoid wearing accessories that contain 

metal, which will set off the metal 

detector.

Put all undeveloped film in your carryon bag. Checked baggage screening 

equipment may damage film.

If carrying a firearm, please check with 

you airline for appropriate procedures. 

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

Prepare for Take-off Q

When you arrive...

Take your 3-1-1 bag out of your carry-on 

and place separately in bin.

Declare all permitted liquid exceptions 

to a security officer in front of the 

checkpoint. 

Take your laptop and video cameras 

with cassettes out of their cases for 

screening.

Remove your footwear and outer coat, 

suit coat, jacket or blazer to place in 

the bin for X-ray.

Place the following items in your 

carry-on before entering the screening 

checkpoint: cell phones and personal 

data assistants, keys, loose change, 

jewelry and large metal items.

For questions visit www.tsa.gov or

e-mail the TSA Contact Center at

TSA-ContactCenter@dhs.gov.

•

•

•

•

•

ounces

quart

bag

TSA’s Key Travel Tip:

3-1-1 to speed screening!

www.tsa.gov
ONE QUART 3 ounces

3 ounces

3 ounces

1

3 ounces

1 quart-size, clear 

plastic, zip-top 

bag holding 3 

ounce or smaller 

containers

Bag limits total 

volume per person

1

1 bag per traveler 

placed in the 

security bin

Isolating liquids 

speeds screening

Container size is a 

security measure

3 ounces

3

3 ounce or 

smaller containers 

of liquid or gel

More than 3 ounces 

permitted in checked 

baggage
# C_2014388EN.01001001.xml

| 3.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2014 — Georgias and Others v Council and Commission

(Case T-168/12) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Zimbabwe - Freezing of funds - Non-contractual liability - Causal link - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Manifest error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons))

2014/C 388/10

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Aguy Clement Georgias (Harare, Zimbabwe); Trinity Engineering (Private) Ltd (Harare); and Georgiadis Trucking (Private) Ltd (Harare) (represented initially by M. Robson and E. Goulder, Solicitors, and H. Mercer QC, and subsequently by M. Robson, H. Mercer QC and I. Quirk, Barrister)

Applicants:

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and G. Étienne, acting as Agents) and European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and S. Bartelt, acting as Agents)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants following the adoption of Commission Regulation (EC) No 412/2007 of 16 April 2007 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe (OJ 2007 L 101, p. 6).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Aguy Clement Georgias, Trinity Engineering (Private) Ltd and Georgiadis Trucking (Private) Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Aguy Clement Georgias, Trinity Engineering (Private) Ltd and Georgiadis Trucking (Private) Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.

1

---
No. 96-5852.

#### Robertson *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. D-1705.

#### In re Disbarment of Grines.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 518 U. S. 1038.]
**Exhibit8**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| **Name of  Subsidiary**                          |   | **Jurisdiction** |   | **Owned by us** |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------|--------|-----------------|--------|
| Mexicana de  Cobre, S.A. de C.V.                 |   | Mexico           |   | 96.43           | %      |
| Mexicana de  Cananea, S.A. de C.V.               |   | Mexico           |   | 98.49           | %      |
| Industrial  Minera Mexico, S.A. de C.V.          |   | Mexico           |   | 100.0           | %      |
| Servicios de  Apoyo Administrativo, S.A. de C.V. |   | Mexico           |   | 100.0           | %      |
| México Compania  Inmobiliaria S.A.          |   | Mexico           |   | 100.0           | %      |
| Minerales y  Minas Mexicanas, S.A. de C.V.       |   | Mexico           |   | 100.0           | %      |
| Minerales  Metálicos del Norte, S.A.        |   | Mexico           |   | 100.0           | %      |
| Mexicana del  Arco, S.A. de C.V.                 |   | Mexico           |   | 100.0           | %      |
| Western Copper  Supplies, Inc.                   |   | U.S.A.           |   | 100.0           | %      |
| Minera Mexico  Internacional, Inc.               |   | U.S.A.           |   | 100.0           | %      |

 

----
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I,
J. Michael Anderson, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Universal Compression, Inc. (the "registrant");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: June 10, 2004 |  |  | /s/J. MICHAEL ANDERSONName: J. Michael Anderson
Title: Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
# C_2014045EN.01003103.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/31

---

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2013 — Wirtgen v OHIM (Shape of a chisel holder)

(Case T-179/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Refusal of registration - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)

2014/C 45/52

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wirtgen GmbH (Windhagen, Germany) (represented by: S. Jackermeier, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 February 2012 (Case R 1923/2011-4), concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional mark in the form of a chisel holder as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.

1

---
```

[111th Congress Public Law 104]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3016]]

Public Law 111-104
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  1615 North Wilcox Avenue in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Johnny 
 Grant Hollywood Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2009 -  [H.R. 
                                2760]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOHNNY GRANT HOLLYWOOD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1615 North Wilcox Avenue in Los Angeles, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Johnny Grant Hollywood Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Johnny 
Grant Hollywood Post Office Building''.

    Approved November 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2760:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Sept. 8, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                           44
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   647
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (38)
<INVENTORY>                                     539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,483
<PP&E>                                          910
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (402)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           607
<BONDS>                                         947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          1
<OTHER-SE>                                      959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,776
<SALES>                                       3,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              3,135
<CGS>                                         2,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  78
<INCOME-TAX>                                     75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (42)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (5)
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (44)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.45)



</TABLE>
#### Elgin National Watch Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6863.

Entry No. 926, etc.

Invoices dated Manchester, England, August 1944, etc.

Certified August 1944, etc.

Entered at Chicago, Ill., September 22, 1944, etc.

(Decided February 13, 1947)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 54338.

#### Smith Chemical & Color Co. *v.*United States,

protest 150768-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the papers failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
# C_2013344EN.01006901.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/69

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 October 2013 — Wahlström v Frontex

(Case F-116/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Temporary agent - Appraisal report - Duty to state reasons - Annual dialogue with the reporting officer - Setting objectives)

2013/C 344/126

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kari Wahlström (Espoo, Finland) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) (represented by: H. Caniard and S.Vuorensola, Agents, and A. Duron and D. Waelbroeck, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the applicant’s staff report and claim for compensation

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Rejects the application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Rejects the application.

| 2. | Orders Mr Wahlström to bear his own costs and to pay the costs of European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Wahlström to bear his own costs and to pay the costs of European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 08.12.2012, p. 39.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report
of Strategic Hotel Capital, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, James E. Mead, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 2, 2006



/s/ James E. MeadJames E. Mead Chief Financial
Officer
October 23, 1942

No. 47676.

#### Protests 55330-K, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. et al.

Government’s application for rehearing granted.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Nortel Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

This Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 ( Amendment No. 1) of the Company fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 23, 2003
    
    FRANK A. DUNNFrank A. Dunn
President and Chief Executive OfficerDated: December 23, 2003
    
    DOUGLAS C. BEATTYDouglas C. Beatty
Chief Financial Officer


84