alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012273EN.01000701.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/7

---

Action brought on 26 June 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-308/12)

2012/C 273/11

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Hetsch, D. Düsterhaus and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not bringing into force all of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, (1) and in any event by not notifying the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 40(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not bringing into force all of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, (1) and in any event by not notifying the Commission of those provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 40(1) of that directive;

1

| — | impose on the Republic of Poland, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a periodic penalty payment for failure to comply with its obligation to notify the Commission of the measures for transposing Directive 2008/98/EC, at a daily rate of EUR 67 314,24 calculated from the date on which judgment is delivered in the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

impose on the Republic of Poland, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a periodic penalty payment for failure to comply with its obligation to notify the Commission of the measures for transposing Directive 2008/98/EC, at a daily rate of EUR 67 314,24 calculated from the date on which judgment is delivered in the present case;

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period within which Directive 2008/98/EC had to be transposed expired on 12 December 2010.

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 312, p. 3.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Daylight saving time: Spring forward this Sunday

By DLA Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              
Daylight saving time returns this Sunday at 2 a.m. when most Americans set their clocks forward at 3 a.m. Most people regard the change as a time when they lose one hour of sleep, but the practice extends evening daylight so days – particularly summer days – last longer. 

Daylight saving time begins the second Sunday in March and ends the first Sunday in November, when clocks are adjusted one hour back to standard time. 

The United States adopted daylight saving time when the Uniform Time Act of 1966 standardized time zones and daylight saving practices across the United States. 

The act allowed states to pass laws exempting themselves. The only states that don’t observe daylight saving time are Hawaii and most of Arizona. It’s also not observed by these U.S. territories: American Somoa, Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Daylight Savings TimeSpring Aheadtime change
Exhibit
4.1


 


For
Value
Received,                              hereby
sell, assign and transfer unto 


                                                                                                                                                                                                


Units
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint
                                               ,
Attorney, 


to
transfer the said Units on the books of the within named Company, with full
power of substitution in the premises.


 


Dated                     ,
20                             


 


In
presence of  


 


 


THE UNITS REPRESENTED BY
THIS CERTIFICATE WERE OFFERED AND SOLD IN RELIANCE ON SECTION 3(a)(l1) AND RULE
147 OF THE SECURITIES ACT COVERING INTRASTATE OFFERS AND SALES OF SECURITIES
AND PURSUANT TO A REGISTRATION STATEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 80A11 OF
MINNESOTA STATUTES. THE UNITS MAY ONLY BE SOLD OR TRANSFERRED TO PERSONS
RESIDENT OF MINNESOTA DURING THE PERIOD IN WHICH THE UNITS ARE PART OF AN ISSUE
BEING OFFERED AND FOR A PERIOD OF NINE MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE LAST SALE OF
UNITS IN THE ISSUE. THE UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN
REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE “SECURITIES ACT”)
OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS OTHER THAN MINNESOTA, AND ARE SUBJECT TO THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS OF A SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT. THE UNITS MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED
FOR SALE, OR TRANSFERRED IN THE ABSENCE OF EITHER AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND UNDER THE APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR AN
OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT
FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES
LAWS.


 


THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS (THE
BOARD) OF THE COMPANY IS AUTHORIZED TO DESIGNATE AND ISSUE ONE OR MORE CLASSES
OF UNITS AS PROVIDED IN THE COMPANY’S OPERATING AND MEMBER CONTROL AGREEMENT
(THE “MEMBER CONTROL AGREEMENT”). A COPY OF THE MEMBER CONTROL AGREEMENT
SETTING FORTH SUCH AUTHORIZATION IS KEPT AT THE COMPANY’S PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICE AND WILL BE FURNISHED BY THE COMPANY TO ANY UNIT HOLDER UPON REQUEST AND
WITHOUT CHARGE.


 


THE UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE
SUBJECT TO FURTHER RESTRICTIONS AS TO THEIR SALE, TRANSFER, HYPOTHECATION, OR
ASSIGNMENT AS SET FORTH IN THE MEMBER CONTROL AGREEMENT. SAID RESTRICTIONS
PROVIDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THAT NO VENDEE, TRANSFEREE, ASSIGNEE, OR ENDORSEE
OF A MEMBER SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO BECOME A MEMBER WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE
COMPANY’S BOARD, WHICH CONSENT MAY BE GIVEN OR WITHHELD IN THE SOLE AND
ABSOLUTE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1816 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to modify a provision relating to 

minimum penalties for repeat offenders for driving while intoxicated 

or driving under the influence. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2011 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. UDALL of New Mexico) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to modify a provision 

relating to minimum penalties for repeat offenders for 

driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MINIMUM PENALTIES FOR REPEAT OFFEND4 ERS FOR DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED OR 

5 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE. 

6 Section 164(a) of title 23, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by striking paragraph (3); 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1816 IS

1 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

2 paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

3 (3) in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) (as 

4 so redesignated), by striking clauses (i) and (ii) and 

5 inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(i) a suspension of all driving privi7 leges for not less than 1 year; or 

8 ‘‘(ii) a combination of suspension of 

9 unlimited driving privileges for 1 year, al10 lowing for reinstatement of limited driving 

11 privileges subject to restrictions and lim12 ited exemptions as established by State 

13 law, if an ignition interlock device is in14 stalled for not less than 1 year on each of 

15 the motor vehicles owned or operated, or 

16 both, by the individual;’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 48828.

#### Protests 818334-G, etc., of Z. Hori Bros. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2014151EN.01000702.xml

| 19.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana — Spain) — Ayuntamiento de Benferri v Consejería de Infraestructuras y Transporte, Iberdrola Distribución Eléctrica SAU

(Case C-300/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment - Construction of certain overhead electrical power lines - Extension of an electrical substation - Project not made subject to an environmental assessment))

2014/C 151/09

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ayuntamiento de Benferri

Applicant:

Defendants: Consejería de Infraestructuras y Transporte, Iberdrola Distribución Eléctrica SAU

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana — Interpretation of point 20 of Annex I and section 3(b) of Annex II to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ 1985 L 175, p. 40), as amended by Directive 97/11/EC (OJ 1997 L 73, p. 5) — Construction of overhead electrical power lines with a voltage of 220 kV or more and a length of more than 15 km — Concept — Project to extend an electrical substation independently of the existing overhead power line — National legislation which does not provide for the submission of that project to an environmental assessment.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of point 20 of Annex I and section 3(b) of Annex II to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997, must be interpreted as meaning that a project such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which relates only to the extension of an electrical voltage transformer substation, is not, as such, among the projects covered by those provisions, unless that extension is part of the construction of overhead electrical power lines, which it is for the national court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.

1

---
No. 49507.

#### Protests 37580-K, etc., of Austin Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
September 6, 1940

No. 44294.

#### Protest 922867-G of Close & Stewart.

Application by plaintiffs for rehearing denied..
#### Dominick MONGELLI, Appellant, v. Peter NILES, Appellee.

No. 97-970.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Sept. 11, 1998.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1998.

Dominick T. Mongelli, Montgomery, AL, pro se.

Nathan G. Dinitz, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.

HARRIS, Judge.

Mongelli sued Niles for legal malpractice in his representation of Mongelli in a criminal case. Mongelli admits that he was guilty of a crime but not the crime to which Niles convinced him to plead. Because of such malpractice, Mongelli claims that he is serving more time in prison than justified. As we indicated in *Steele v. Kehoe,*23 Fla. Law Weekly D771, — So.2d -, 1998 WL 121499 (Fla. 5th DCA, Mar.20, 1998), the issue as to whether the defendant has been improperly convicted or has been sentenced to a greater period than appropriate can best be determined by the criminal court. In this case, that was done.

Mongelli attempted to withdraw his plea because of ineffective assistance of counsel and the motion was denied by the Federal District Court, upheld on appeal by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

The trial court below found, and we agree, that this case is controlled by *Zeidwig v. Ward,*548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989), and granted summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
No. 44292.

#### Protests 890877-G, etc., of Rubin Levine et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Bbown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
No. 54986.

#### Ashear Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 137118-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
**Exhibit
      23.2**







**[LETTERHEAD
      OF KPMG]**


**CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 The
        Board
        of Directors
 SmarTire
        Systems Inc.
 
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
        (Nos.
        333-122098, 333-107904, 333-107903, 333-93021, 333-80923, 333-67751, 333-55810,
        and 333-135713) on Form S-8 of SmarTire Systems Inc. of our report dated
        September 16, 2005, except for note 13 which is as of September 23, 2005,
        and
        note 4 which is as of June 30, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance
        sheet of SmarTire Systems Inc. as of July 31, 2005, and the related consolidated
        statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (capital deficit) and
        comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the years ended July 31, 2005, and
        July
        31, 2004, which report appears in the July 31, 2006 annual report on Form
        10-KSB
        of SmarTire Systems Inc. Our report dated September 16, 2005, except for
        note 13 which is as of September 23, 2005, and note 4 which is as of June
        30,
        2006 includes additional comments for U.S. readers on Canada - U.S. reporting
        differences that states that the financial statements are affected by conditions
        and events that cast substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a
        going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
        might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.
 
 
 /s/
        KPMG LLP
 Chartered
        Accountants
 
 Vancouver,
        Canada
 October
        30, 2006
No. 45284.

#### Protest 971312-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of trick paddles in chief value of wood similar to those the subject of Abstract 44028. The claim at 33)4 percent under paragraph 412 was therefore sustained'.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****U.S. overseas loans and grantsand assistance from international organizations [electronic resource] :obligations and loan authorizations.**
 
1945-63 | -64| -65 | -66| -67 | -68| -69 | -70| -71
 
SuDoc Number:S 18.2:OV 2/
Item Number:0900-C-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000656513
 
January 8, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                              44
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      697
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (45)
<INVENTORY>                                        589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,443
<PP&E>                                           1,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (505)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              636
<BONDS>                                            947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,812
<SALES>                                          3,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,310
<CGS>                                            2,307
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     8
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  61
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     85
<INCOME-TAX>                                        78
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  7
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (46)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (5)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (44)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.45)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm 

The Hackett Group, Inc.

Miami, Florida 

We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87749 and 333-32342) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69951, 333-90635, 333-39460, 333-64542, and 333-108640) of The Hackett Group, Inc. (formerly Answerthink, Inc. priorto January 1, 2008) of our reports dated March 10, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of The Hackett Group, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting,which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP 

Miami, Florida 

March 10, 2011
**Exhibit 23.1**

**INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of International Smart Sourcing, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-48701) of our report dated March 8, 2006, except with respect to Note 21 (b) which is dated March 24, 2006, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of International Smart Sourcing Inc. as of December 30, 2005 and for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of International Smart Sourcing Inc. for the year ended December 30, 2005. 

| */s/  Marcum & Kliegman LLP* |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                            |   |
| *Marcum & Kliegman LLP*                |   |
| *New York, NY*                             |   |
| *March 28, 2006*                           |   |
On the Letterhead of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.


AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.
 Suite 1330, 200 Granville Street,
 Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1S4
     To the Board of Directors of Rubicon Minerals Corporation (the “Company”)
     The undersigned hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the technical report titled “F2 Gold System - Phoenix Gold Project Bateman Township Red Lake, Canada Technical Report” dated effective August 8, 2011 (the “Technical Report”) and extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report in the written disclosure contained in the Company’s annual information form for the financial year ended December 31, 2012 dated March 12th, 2013.
   Dated as of this 12th day of March, 2013
    AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd.
  By:“/s/  Patrick R. Stephenson”
  Name:  Patrick R. Stephenson
  Title:    Director