alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                               SUBSIDIARY LISTING
                            As of September 29, 2001

COMPANIES

Ames True Temper, Inc.
Architectural Area Lighting Inc.
Artesanias Baja S.A. de C.V.
Asteria Company
BB Investments
Bowers Group PLC
Bowers Metrology Ltd.
Bowers Metrology UK Ltd.
Columbia Lighting - LCA, Inc.
Columbia Lighting, Inc.
Convetry Gauge Limited
CV Instruments Ltd.
Dual-Lite Inc.
Dual-Lite Manufacturing Inc.
Eclipse Magnetics Limited
Elektrokovina Svetilke d.o.o.
Elektrokovina Technica d.o.o.
Eljer Industries, Inc.
Eljer Plumbingware, Inc.
Gatsby Spas, Inc.
Industrias Eljer de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
IXL Manufacturing, Inc.
Jacuzzi (Chile) S.A.
Jacuzzi (Europe) S.p.A.
Jacuzzi Asia Pacific Pty Ltd
Jacuzzi do Brazil Industria e Commercio Ltda.
Jacuzzi Inc.
Jacuzzi Leisure Products Inc.
Jacuzzi Singapore Pte Ltd
James Neill (New Zealand) Limited
James Neill Canada Inc.
James Neill Holdings Limited
JNU International (Australia) Pty Ltd
JUSI Holdings, Inc.
Kim Lighting Inc.
KLI, Inc.
Knoblich-Licht Ges. mbH
LCA Group Inc.
Magnacut Ltd.
Neill Tools Limited
O. Ames Argentina, S.A.
O. Ames Co. Chile
<Page>

PH Property Development Company
Prescolite, Inc.
Progress Lighting Inc.
Rexair Holdings, Inc.
Rexair, Inc.
Selkirk Canada, Inc.
Selkirk, Inc.
Siteco Beleuchtungstechnik GmbH
Siteco Holdings GmbH
Societe Neill France S.A.
Societe Rectilor S.A.
Spaulding Lighting, Inc.
Spear & Jackson plc
Sundance Spas, Inc.
SuperVent Products Inc.
The Spring Ram Corporation plc
True Temper Ireland
United States Brass Corporation
USI American Holdings, Inc.
USI Atlantic Corp.
USI Canada Inc.
USI Capital, Inc.
USI Global Corp.
USI Mayfair Limited
USI Overseas Holdings Limited
USI Properties, Inc.
Zurn Industries, Inc.


* This list excludes dormant and other subsidiaries not meaningful for
  presentation herein.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NUEVO FINANCIAL CENTER, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jose Araque, President, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Jose Araque
    ----------------------------------
    Jose Araque
    President, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer,
    Chairman of the Board of Directors

November 20, 2006
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
J. Michael Anderson, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. (the "registrant");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: June 10, 2004 |  |  | /s/J. MICHAEL ANDERSONName: J. Michael Anderson
Title: Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
# C_2012366EN.01003502.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/35

---

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2012 — EDF v Commission

(Case T-389/12 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Concentrations - Electricity market - Decision authorising a concentration operation subject to compliance with certain commitments - Refusal to grant the postponement of the deadline set for fulfilling those commitments - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

2012/C 366/71

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Électricité de France (EDF) (Paris (France)) (represented by: A. Creus Carreras and A. Valiente Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and S. Noë, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures in relation to Commission Decision C(2012) 4617 final of 28 June 2012 refusing to grant the applicant the postponement of the deadline fixed for fulfilling some of its commitments set out in Decision C(2009) 9059 of 12 November 2009, which authorises the concentration operation whereby Électricité de France was to acquire exclusive control of the assets of Segebel (Case COMP/M.5549 — EDF/Segebel).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
No. 96-7506.

#### Madanat *v.*Alpha Therapeutic Corp. et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
      ( Form
      S-3
      No .
      333-124003, No. 333-124278 and No. 333-140354 )
      and in
      the related Prospectuses of
      Capital Lease Funding, Inc. and in the
      Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
      333-113852 and No. 333-137501) of
      Capital Lease Funding, Inc. ,
      of our
      report dated
      March 8, 2005, with
      respect to the consolidated
      statements of income, stockholders’ equity/members’ capital, and cash flows of
      Capital Lease Funding, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004, included
      in
      this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
      2006.




/s/
      Ernst
& Young LLP




New
      York,
      New York


March
      7,
      2007
No. 74-887.

#### Rayner et al. *v.*City Council of the City of Chicago et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Before the Second Division,

June 11, 1952

No. 56761.

protest 138257-K (New York).

#### Philipp Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of articles of which metal is the component material of chief value, other than ores or concentrates or crude metal, which were imported to be used in remanufaeture by melting, and that they have been used in remanufac-ture by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the *510Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, *supra.*Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
No. 96-7571.

#### Wilson *v.*Anderson, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2016314EN.01003501.xml

| 29.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/35

---

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2016 — British Telecommunications v Commission

(Case T-456/12) (1)

1

(2016/C 314/47)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David W.Whitwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

Theforegoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject toliability under this section.  Thiscertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to theextent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly incorporated by reference in anysuch filing.
| Dated: May 14, 2007 | /s/ David W. Whitwell   |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                | David W. Whitwell       |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# What is a National Stock Number?

By DLA Public AffairsDLA Public Affairs

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              
What is a National Stock Number and what is it used for? The 13-digit unique code is assigned to an item of supply that is repeatedly stocked, stored and issued throughout the federal supply system. It’s assigned at the request of the military services, certain federal or civilian agencies and foreign friendly countries. Learn all you need to know about NSNs.

View the video on YouTube.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

national stock numbersfederal supply system
No. 74-843.

#### Gordon *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 48845.

#### Protests 41285-K, etc., of Kaufmann Department Stores et al. (Pittsburgh, etc.).

*278Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2013063EN.01002401.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/24

---

Action brought on 28 December 2012 — Matrix Energetics International/OHIM (MATRIX ENERGETICS)

(Case T-573/12)

2013/C 63/49

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Matrix Energetics International, Inc. (Lynnwood, United States) (represented by: R. Böhm, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of appeal of the Office Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 October 2012 in Case R 56/2012-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of appeal of the Office Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 October 2012 in Case R 56/2012-4;

| — | Order the Office Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to bear the costs of the proceeding. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to bear the costs of the proceeding.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘MATRIX ENERGETICS’ for services in class 41 — International registration No W 995 247

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refused protection of the International Registration designating the European Union

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
No. 74-6154.

#### Morton et al. *v.*Meacham, Warden, et al.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
Before the Third Division,

June 14, 1944

No. 49499.

#### Protests 94658-K, etc., of B. C. Bendixen & P. T. Johannessen et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 42078.

#### Petitions 5415-R, etc., of Fillette-Green & Co., Inc. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the merchandise consists of metal drums imported from Germany and that the collector of customs questioned the correctness of the deduction of nondutiable charges and filed an appeal to reap-praisement. Being of the opinion that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States, or to conceal or misrepresent the facts, or to deceive the appraiser, the court granted the petitions.
EXHIBIT 10.10
                                    ADDENDUM


        This ADDENDUM ("Addendum"),  dated March 29, 2002 and effective February
28, 2000, amends and supplements the Memorandum of Understanding ("Memorandum"),
dated December 22, 1998,  between  Nebraska Book Company,  Inc.  ("Company") and
Barry S. Major ("Executive") as follows:

1. On May  10,  2000,  Company  entered  into a  Management  Services  Agreement
("Agreement") with  TheCampusHub.com,  Inc.  ("CampusHub"),  under which Company
agreed to supervise and manage the day-to-day operations of CampusHub.

2. On or about February 28, 2000,  CampusHub  offered Executive a position as an
executive  officer of CampusHub.  Such position  would not require the full time
and  attention  of  Executive.  Executive  desires to accept the position and to
continue in his present position with Company.

3. Having  investigated  the  circumstances  of CampusHub's  offer to Executive,
Company  acknowledges  and agrees that  Executive's  employment  as an executive
officer of CampusHub would not  substantially  interfere with the performance of
Executive's duties under the Memorandum and,  consequently,  has no objection to
Executive accepting CampusHub's offer.

4. The parties acknowledge and agree that, to the extent Executive is performing
services  on behalf of  Company,  including,  but not  limited  to,  services in
furtherance of Company's  obligations  under the Agreement,  Executive  shall be
subject to the direction and control of the board of directors of Company,  but,
to the extent Executive is performing services on behalf of CampusHub, Executive
is subject to the direction and control of the board of directors of CampusHub.



                                             NEBRASKA BOOK COMPANY, INC.


                                             By:  /s/ Mark W. Oppegard
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Mark W. Oppegard
                                             Chief Executive Officer,
                                             President and Director


                                            EXECUTIVE


                                            By:  /s/ Barry S. Major
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Barry S. Major
# C_2012109EN.01003102.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/31

---

Action brought on 20 February 2012 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-82/12)

2012/C 109/63

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mohammad Makhlouf (Damas, Syria) (represented by: C. Rygaert and G. Karouni, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria and repealing Decision 2011/273/CFSP; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria and repealing Decision 2011/273/CFSP;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs under Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs under Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-383/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ 2011 C 282, p. 30.

1

---
# Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL
April26, 2016 U.S. Dept. ofTransportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 

### We Make 

## oDifference

Submitted Bectronicalty via the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Re: Addendum to Michael Baker International's Exemption No. 

### 11711, Regulatory Docket No. 

### FAA

### 2015-om issues on May

### 29. 2015. Dear Sir or Madam: Michael Baker International is requesting an Addendum to the above Exemption to allow forthe inclusion ofadditional Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) UA's as follows: • OJI Phantom 4 • senseFiy albris (previously eXam) • Topcon Falcon 8 The above systems are equivalent in size, weight and operating procedures tothe VTOL/Multi-Rotor aircraft already included in our Exemption and therefore no additional procedures will be needed as part ofthis addendum. Sincerely.

Robert Haq?.Qr.J· · Senior Vice**'Pr~sident** Michael Baker International, LLC. Phone: 717-221-2005 Email: rhanson@mbakerintl.com

MBAKERINTL.COM 4431 N. FrontStreet. 2"dFloor IHarrisburg. PA 17110 Office: ]17.221.2000 IFax: 717.234.7611
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. David MEADE, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 22, 1999.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June 1999, the petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County to conduct an eviden-tiary hearing to determine whether petitioner is entitled to relief for untimely sentencing pursuant to *Commonwealth v. Anders, 555*Pa. 467, 725 A.2d 170 (1999).
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Chase Manhattan Owner Trust 1998-B

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of April 1, 1998 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by and
between Chase USA and Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 1998-B, as issuer (the
"Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

         1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
         January 1, 2001 until December 31, 2001 was conducted under my
         supervision.

         2. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
         fully performed in all material respects all its obligations, under the
         Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no material
         default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is
         continuing except as set forth in paragraph 3 below.

         3. None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March 2002.


                                                        /s/ Jeffrey S. Browning
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Jeffrey S. Browning
                                                        Vice President