alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016232EN.01002201.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/22

---

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2016 — Athens Resort Casino v Commission

(Case T-36/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Annulment of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 232/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Athens Resort Casino AE Symmetochon (Maroussi, Greece) (represented by: N. Niejahr, lawyer, F. Carlin, Barrister, Q. Azau, F. Spyropoulos, I. Dryllerakis, K. Spyropoulos, A. Komninos, K. Struckmann, lawyers, and M. Powell, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, H. van Vliet and P. J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE (Loutraki, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011 on State aid C 16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by Greece in favour of certain Greek casinos (OJ 2011 L 285, p. 25).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Athens Resort Casino AE Symmetochon |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Athens Resort Casino AE Symmetochon

| 3. | Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 17.3.2012.

1

---
#### ALFA MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Tracie F. PAYTON. Tracie F. Payton v. Alfa Mutual Fire Insurance Company.

2960518.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 30, 1999.

Philip S. Gidiere, Jr., and Steven K. Herndon of Gidiere & Hinton, Montgomery, for appellant/cross appellee Alfa Mutual Fire Insurance Company.

Tyrone C. Means, Cynthia W. Clinton, Milton J. Westry, and Paul C. Williams of Thomas, Means & Gillis, P.C., Montgomery, for appellee/cross appellant Tracie F. Payton.

*After Remand from Supreme Court*

WRIGHT, Retired Appellate Judge.

Whereas, on July 14, 1999, the Supreme Court of Alabama issued its certificate of judgment in this case, thereby reversing the judgment of this court issued on October 10, 1997, insofar as this court had affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lowndes County denying the defendant’s postjudgment motion for a judgment as a matter of law,

Wherefore, it is now the judgment of this court that the judgment of the circuit court be reversed and in all respects be set aside as directed by the supreme court.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Appellate Judge L. Charles Wright while serving on active-duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e), Code 1975.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the judges concur.
Consumer Product Safety Alert

FROM THE U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20207

Old Accordion Style Baby Gates 

Are Dange ro u s

009611

The U. S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)

warns of an entrapment and strangulation hazard that

exists with accordion-style baby gates manufactured prior

to February 1985.These gates have V-shaped openings

along the top edge and diamond-shaped openings in the

sides that are large enough to entrap a child’s head. CPSC

knows of 9 deaths and at least 25 “near-misses” because

of the entrapment hazard of these gates. Most of the

deaths occurred when children’s heads became entrapped

in the V-shaped openings.

In contrast, other styles of baby gates--such as a straight

top edge and rigid mesh screen, or openings too small for

a child’s head to enter--do not present the

entrapment/strangulation hazard.

CPSC worked with the Juvenile Products Manufacturers

Association (JPMA) to develop an ASTM (formerly the

American Society for Testing and Materials) voluntary standard to address the entrapment/strangulation hazard.The

standard restricts the width of V-shaped openings in the

top edge of a gate to no more than 1.5 inches and limits

the diamond-shaped openings to a size that prevents entry

of the head of a 6 month old child. Gates that meet the

requirements in the ASTM voluntary standard are safer

than the old accordion-style gates. CPSC has no reports of

deaths or near misses due to head entrapment in these

newer gates.

Caregivers who have the old gates with large V- or diamond-shaped openings should discontinue their use.

Of course, in order to prevent falls when using any type of

baby gates, care should be taken to be sure they’re

securely latched and that children do not attempt to climb

on them.
# C_2014039EN.01002002.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/20

---

Order of the General Court of 3 December 2013 — Pri v OHIM — Belgravia Investment Group (PRONOKAL)

(Case T-159/12) (1)

1

(Removal from the register - Pleading submitted at the time of discontinuance - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 39/34

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pri SA (Clémency, Luxembourg) (represented by: C. Marí Aguilar and F. Márquez Martín, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Belgravia Investment Group Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: J. Bouyssou, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Firstly, action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 December 2011 (Case R 311/2011-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Pri SA and Belgravia Investment Group Ltd, and, secondly, application for rejection of the application for registration of the mark applied for in respect of all the goods covered by the opposition proceedings.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Case T-159/12 shall be removed from the register of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Case T-159/12 shall be removed from the register of the General Court.

| 2. | The pleading lodged by Pri SA, contained in the letter filed at the Registry of the General Court on 13 September 2013, requesting, firstly, that the General Court state that the opposition was withdrawn; secondly, that it rescind the decision of the Opposition Division of 7 December 2010 in so far as it rejects in part the opposition; and, thirdly, that it order that the ‘release in full’ of the mark PRONOKAL be registered are rejected as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The pleading lodged by Pri SA, contained in the letter filed at the Registry of the General Court on 13 September 2013, requesting, firstly, that the General Court state that the opposition was withdrawn; secondly, that it rescind the decision of the Opposition Division of 7 December 2010 in so far as it rejects in part the opposition; and, thirdly, that it order that the ‘release in full’ of the mark PRONOKAL be registered are rejected as inadmissible.

| 3. | Pri SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Pri SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by OHIM.

| 4. | Belgravia Investment Group Ltd shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Belgravia Investment Group Ltd shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.

1

---
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Composition of Payroll Hours in Manufacturing. 1958

              																	Lewis, L. Earl. 						*Composition of Payroll Hours in Manufacturing. 1958 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1283*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4558,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350

The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certify that
this report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


    Date: November 14, 2005       By: /s/ Lee Cole
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      Lee Cole, CEO, President and Director


    Date: November 14, 2005       By: /s/ Linden Boyne
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Linden Boyne , CFO, Secretary-Treasurer &
                                      Director
Exhibit No. 32.1

Form 10-QSB

The Quantum Group, Inc.

File No. 000-31727

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Noel J. Guillama, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date  September 19, 2006

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ NOELJ. GUILLAMA    
| |     | Noel J. Guillama       
| |     | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Quantum Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Quantum Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 2:31 PM

To: 'greyson@aerialapproach.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Petition for Exemption: Ae rial Approach, LTD (FAA-2015-0753)



### May 28, 2015

Dear Mr. Morrow:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0753). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, ro torcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description shoul d include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by June 11, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
No. 47701

#### Protest 86279-K of Miller Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 46910 the woven silk mufflers in question were held dutiable as claimed.
----

**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 I, F. John Norman, certify that: 

 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Pacific Rim Mining  Corp. (the “Company”); 

 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not  misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information  included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and  for, the periods presented in this report; 

 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing  and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have: 

 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that  material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly  during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls  and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the  period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; 

 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control  over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent  fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based  on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize  and report financial information; and 

 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees  who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial  reporting. 

 Date: August 18, 2004

| By:     /s/ “F.John      Norman” | F. John Norman      Chief Financial Officer       (Principal Financial Officer) |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Luis Pena supports post-Maria Puerto Rico   

By Jake JoyDLA Disposition Services

                SAN JUAN, PR.  –              https://youtu.be/8aSG2X1wWMY
 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Hurricane MariaDLA Disposition ServicesPuerto Rico
# C_2014245EN.01001101.xml

| 28.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/11

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2014 — Klingel v OHIM — Develey (JUNGBORN)

(Case T-401/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark JUNGBORN - Earlier national word mark BORN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 245/14

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Robert Klingel OHG (Pforzheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Zeiher, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Develey Holding GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG (Unterhaching, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein and H. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2012 (Case R 936/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Develey Holding GmbH & Co. Beteiligungs KG and Robert Klingel OHG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Robert Klingel OHG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Robert Klingel OHG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.

1

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JAMES E. RYBICKI, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-820

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Respondent. )

)

Opinion filed August 24, 2018.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit 

Court for Pinellas County; William H. 

Burgess, Judge.

J.S. Lucas Fleming of The Fleming Law

Group, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jason M. Miller, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Denied. 

KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
PUBLISHED FILED: November 17, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1009 (CA-98-1817-3-19) STERLING DREW, a minor under the age of thirteen years, by guardian ad litem Martha Drew; MARTHA DREW; JEBEDIAH DREW, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and WIDENER, WILKINS, NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. ORDER This appeal having come on for oral argument before the en banc Court on October 31, 2000, pursuant to Order of September 8, 2000, by which the panel opinion of June 27, 2000, 217 F.3d 193, was vacated and en banc consideration was granted, IT IS ORDERED, by virtue of an equally divided vote of the active members of the Court, that the judgment appealed from be, and it is hereby, AFFIRMED. For the Court,

/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk