alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Troop Support celebrates Army birthday

By DLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                PHILADELPHIA  –              
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support celebrated the 243rd Army birthday during a senior leader staff meeting June 12, as its youngest soldier, 1st Lt. Riley Kramer, and senior enlisted soldier, Master Sgt. Cynthia Gyening, performed the traditional cake cutting. 

 

DLA Troop Support’s Subsistence supply chain also helped soldiers around the globe celebrate by providing birthday cakes – such as red velvet, almond cream, German chocolate and double chocolate – to locations including Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan and Kuwait.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Stories

Retired Army warrant officer reflects on personal meaning of Memorial Day

Subsistence helps Army Spec Ops nutrition program

Army researching high-performance lightweight helmet

Army BIrthdayU.S. ArmyDLA Troop SupportSubsistenceSoldier
**EXHIBIT12(b)**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mexicana deCobre, S.A. de C.V. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Jesus Eduardo González Félix, Finance Director of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date:  July 15, 2003 |   | /s/ Jesus Eduardo González  Félix |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Finance Director                            |
|                      |   |                                        |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mexicana de Cobre, S.A. de C.V. and will beretained by Mexicana de Cobre, S.A. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# C_2015171EN.01002401.xml

| 26.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2015 — Deutsche Börse v Commission

(Case T-175/12) (1)

1

((Competition - Concentrations - Financial instruments sector - European derivatives market - Decision declaring that the concentration is incompatible with the internal market - Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition - Efficiency gains - Commitments))

(2015/C 171/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Börse AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: C. Zschocke, J. Beninca and T. Schwarze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou, V. Bottka, N. Khan and B. Mongin, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Icap Securities Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: C.T. Riis-Madsen, lawyer, and S. Stephanou, Solicitor)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 440 final of 1 February 2012, declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case No COMP/M.6166 — Deutsche Börse/NYSE Euronext).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Deutsche Börse AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Icap Securities Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Deutsche Börse AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by Icap Securities Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9669)

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 2769.

*659(Decided April 18, 1960)

*Stein & Shostalc*for the plaintiff.

*George Goehr an Doul),*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the Appeal for Reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, that, at the time of exportation to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States were the appraised values less additions made to meet the advances by the Appraiser in similar cases covering the non-dutiable so-called f.o.b. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage, petties, etc., added by the importer on entry.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there were no higher foreign values for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise covered by the Appeal for Reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases, at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal for Re-appraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I hold the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved merchandise, and that such value was the appraised value, less additions made to meet the advances by the appraiser in similar cases covering the nondutiable so-called f.o.b. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage, petties, etc., added by the importer on entry.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 10.35

AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE  TO THE UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION, INC.  EMPLOYEES' SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN

WHEREAS, Universal Compression, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the Universal Compression, Inc. Employees' Supplemental Savings Plan, effective
July 1, 1998 (the "Plan");

WHEREAS,
Section 11.1 of the Plan reserves to the Company the right to amend the Plan by action of its Board of Directors (the "Board"); and

WHEREAS,
the Board has approved the amendment to the Plan to provide that a Participant's Matching Contributions that are deemed invested in the common stock of Universal Compression
Holdings, Inc. shall be distributed in such form;

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of this amendment by the Company, the undersigned officer being duly authorized has signed this amendment to be effective as of
September 1, 2002.

| |  | UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION, INC.
| |  | ---------------------------
| |  | By:                        

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit31.4**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, J. Michael Anderson,certify that:

1.                       I havereviewed this report on Form 10-K of Universal Compression, Inc. (the “registrant”);

2.                       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                       Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             [RESERVED]

c)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)             disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  | February 28,  2007 | /s/ J. Michael Anderson |   |
|--------|--------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:              | J. Michael Anderson     |
|   | Title:             | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                    |                         |        |  |

 

 

1

----
# C_2014102EN.01003301.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — Advance Magazine Publishers v OHIM — López Cabré (TEEN VOGUE)

(Case T-37/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark TEEN VOGUE - Earlier national word mark VOGUE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Identical nature of the goods - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Rule 22(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Partial refusal to register))

2014/C 102/52

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. (New York, New York, United States of America) (represented by T. Alkin, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by P. Bullock, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Eduardo López Cabré (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 November 2011 (case R 1763/2010-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Mr Eduardo López Cabré and Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc., to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.

1

---
6FFlCE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Honorable Cullen B. Vame County Attorney Jaokson County ltdna, Texas

Dear Sir:

@&‘/ 

### 4606 R.C.S.) provides the return muatbe made performed, but I have dany statute or dealsion

which the rites of after the laauArticles 

### 4604 and

### 46040, Vermonta Annotated Civil Statutes, respectively provide:

“Persons whodesire to marry shall prooure from the County Clerk a lloense direoted

.Honorable Cullen B. Vance, Page 2

to all persons authorized by lav to celebrate the rites of n@trimOnY, which shall be auSSlclent authority to celebrate suohmarriage,”

“Before the County Clerk shall issue any marriage lloenme the manshall produoe a oectlfioate from a reputable lioemed phyalolah to showthat he 18 free Sron all venereal dlsea8es. * (Bnphasls 

### ours) AUa 

### generalrule, time v1th.h vhloh an aOt met whena statute preearibes no be be done within a reasonable time.done, then the act rhould

Wehave still a Further basis. In our opinion No, o-5755, dated December 23, 1943, we said1



### *

, . *
.

“It vi11 be noted that the foregoing etatute prescriber no time that the oertlfloate from a reputable liceneed physiolan shall remain valid for the Purpose 

### of 18suing a

### mnrriege license. Oenerally speaking, whena statute prescribes no t-e v1W.n vhiOh ansot must be done, then the sot should be done within a reasonable time. "what Is a reasonable time within whlah m act must be done OFddinsrily means 80muohtime as is neaeasary, under the olraumstanoea, and what the duties reQulr% in the ptwtioular ease. Se! Wordaand PhrsLles, PerIn,Ed., Vol. 6, page Stated another way, reasonable time is eueh'promptitude as the situation of the parties and the oiraumatanoes OSthe aaae will 8110~. It never meansan indulgenae In unneoeesary delay or in delay oocasioned by vain and fruitless effort to do the aOt required. Q See Lewie, 218pa. 141, 11 LR.A. French Y. 94 , 

### N.8.)

“In answer to your Slret question, you 

### are advised that it is our Opinion that the Oertlficate from a reputable and lloensed physioian remal.nsvalid for the purpoee OSIssuing a

### marriageHonmmble Cullen B. Vanoe, Page

### 3

llaenne under Artlole 46040, supra, **for** a ma- ~sonable length of time after the physician has issued suoh oertlflcste. " (I

. . . . **A**pub110health polloy .Surther demandsthat the physloian~s oertlfloate remain valid for only **a** reasonable length of time.- This samepub110polloy demandsthat the ~s~~~ 1lo0~1e remain valid for only a reasonable length

IS ve should hold otherwise, ve would, in erieat, negativi the purpose OSArtlale 

### 46040, supra.

It is the opinion of 

### this department, therefore, tbat the marriage ceremony should be performed wlthln a reasonable length of time aiter the lsrunnoe o? the lloense tomm-y. ife 

### furtherbelieve that **a** reasonable length of time la suSSi.olently derined in our foregoing quotation from our Opinion No. 

### O-5755, rupra.

~llt~ thir 88ti8iaOtOZ'ilj 8118Wer8 your **inqui~,** ve **am**

Yours very truly ATTORNNY

CNNNRALOFTNXAS 

# By ~m~&df-&&“-

'Assistant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BIRCH TELECOM, INC. AS OF, AND FOR THE YEAR
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF
BIRCH TELECOM, INC.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          39,745
<SECURITIES>                                    15,888
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                       228
<INVENTORY>                                        916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,114
<PP&E>                                          26,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                     747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,394
<BONDS>                                        114,681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           14,063
<PREFERRED>                                          8
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      (7,112)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,149
<SALES>                                         26,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,087
<CGS>                                           18,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,208)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,208)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,208)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.71)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO
              18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350
              AS
      ADDED BY
              SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Peoples Financial Services
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Debra E. Dissinger,
Executive Vice President, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. To my
knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.







By/s/
            Debra
      E. Dissinger
              Executive
      Vice President
              Principal
      Financial Officer





Date:
March 15, 2010
No. 74-786.

#### Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. *v.*Illinois Pollution Control Board et al.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Motion of respondents Hemmerick et al. for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.