alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9093)

#### American Cyanimid Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 789972.

(Decided March 7, 1958)

*Fred Bennett*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court — •

> 1- That the merchandise the subject of the above entitled reappraisement appeal consists of Mono Cresyl Glyceryl Ether imported from England.

> 2- That, at the time of exportation of the merchandise herein, no similar competitive article was manufactured or produced in the United States.

> 3- That, at the time of exportation of the merchandise herein, neither such nor similar imported merchandise was freely offered for sale for domestic consumption, packed ready for delivery, in the principal market of the United States to all purchasers, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade.

> *4r~*That, at the time of exportation of the merchandise herein, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice and entered price, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above-mentioned reappraisement appeal is hereby submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the mono cresyl glyceryl ether in question, and I hold such statutory value for the merchandise to be the invoice and entered price. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
NO. 07-01-0352-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	NOVEMBER 6, 2001

	______________________________

	IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

	WILLIAM JOSEPH STEWART AND TAMMY LYNNE STEWART

	AND IN THE INTEREST OF JOSEPH BROGAN STEWART, A CHILD

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 99-508,361; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	On November 1, 2001, the appellant filed an Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal averring that the parties have resolved the issues and agree that the appeal should be dismissed.

	Without passing on the merits of the case, the Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).  

No order pertaining to costs is hereby made as all costs have been paid.  Having dismissed the appeal at the appellant’s request and the appellee is not opposed to such a request,  no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

							Phil Johnson

							    Justice

Do not publish.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

 

In connection with the quarterlyReport of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoingcertification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liabilityunder this section.  This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1is expressly incorporated by reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated: August 22,  2005 | /s/ Henry J.  Boucher, Jr. |   |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Henry J.  Boucher, Jr.     |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


                    Bingham Canyon Corporation

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Brett D. Mayer, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of Bingham Canyon
Corporation certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

a.    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date:   May 10, 2004
                                     /s/ Brett D. Mayer
                                    _________________________________________
                                    Brett D. Mayer
                                    Principal Executive and Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 14, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41557

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ORLANDER CRAZE JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-131-3

--------------------

Before KING, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Orlander Craze Johnson appeals his conviction, following a

jury trial, for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

50 grams or more of cocaine base. He first asserts that the

evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the

Government’s case relied primarily on the testimony of a

coconspirator, which he contends was unreliable and

unsubstantiated. The testimony of various Government witnesses,

including the cooperating coconspirator, was sufficient to

support the conspiracy conviction because the testimony
No. 05-41557

-2-

established the existence of an agreement between two or more

persons to violate narcotics laws, Johnson’s knowledge of such

agreement, and his voluntary participation in it. See United

States v. Peters, 283 F.3d 300, 307 (5th Cir. 2002); United

States v. Westbrook, 119 F.3d 1176, 1189 (5th Cir. 1997).

Johnson avers that the district court should have excluded,

under FED. R. EVID. 404(b), the evidence of extraneous drug

transactions. The district court’s evidentiary ruling with

respect to Johnson’s extraneous drug transactions was in accord

with Rule 404(b), which provides that extrinsic evidence of other

crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character

of a person to show action in conformity therewith, but is

admissible for other purposes, such as intent. See FED. R. EVID.

404(b); United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir.

1978) (en banc). Also, the district court diminished the

prejudicial effect of the Rule 404(b) evidence by giving a

limiting instruction to the jury regarding the proper use of the

evidence. United States v. Taylor, 210 F.3d 311, 318 (5th Cir.

2000). The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion

with reference to the challenged evidentiary ruling. United

States v. Buchanan, 70 F.3d 818, 831 (5th Cir. 1995). The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
___________________________

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report of Millennium Capital Venture Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Mario Drolet, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 23, 2004	By:/s/ MARIO DROLET
Name:	Mario Drolet
	Title: 	President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
```

[111th Congress Public Law 99]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3011]]

Public Law 111-99
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, Washington, as the ``John 
    `Bud' Hawk Post Office''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2009 -  [H.R. 955]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOHN ``BUD'' HAWK POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10355 Northeast Valley Road in Rollingbay, Washington, shall 
be known and designated as the ``John `Bud' Hawk Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John `Bud' 
Hawk Post Office''.

    Approved November 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 955:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Mar. 17, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 47052.

#### Protest 821660-G of S. E. Laszlo (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of air pistols and parts thereof the same as those the subject of *Laszlo*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 47). In accordance therewith-the claim at 27)4 percent under paragraph 372 was sustained.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1899 

To require that members of the Armed Forces who were killed or wounded 

in the attack that occurred at a recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 2009, are treated in the same manner as members 

who are killed or wounded in a combat zone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2011 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself and Mr. PRYOR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require that members of the Armed Forces who were 

killed or wounded in the attack that occurred at a recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 

2009, are treated in the same manner as members who 

are killed or wounded in a combat zone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Ezeagwula 

5 and Long Act’’ or the ‘‘HEAL Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1899 IS

1 SEC. 2. EQUITABLE TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF THE 

2 ARMED FORCES KILLED OR WOUNDED IN 

3 LITTLE ROCK RECRUITING STATION ATTACK. 

4 For purposes of all applicable Federal laws, regula5 tions, and policies, the members of the Armed Forces who 

6 were killed or wounded in the attack that occurred at a 

7 recruiting station in Little Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 

8 2009, shall be deemed to have been killed or wounded in 

9 a combat zone as the result of an act of an enemy of the 

10 United States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report of Caneum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal financial officer of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date:September 10, 2007   /s/ Gary Allhusen     Gary Allhusen, Chief Operating Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1790 

To modify the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan to provide 

that the full statement of budget resources of the Department of Defense 

is complete and validated by not later than September 30, 2014. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2011 

Ms. AYOTTE (for herself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To modify the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness 

Plan to provide that the full statement of budget resources of the Department of Defense is complete and 

validated by not later than September 30, 2014. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Defense 

5 Audit Readiness Act of 2011’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1790 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUDIT READINESS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF 

2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. 

3 Section 1003(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the National Defense 

4 Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 

5 84; 123 Stat. 2440; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is amended by 

6 inserting ‘‘, and that a complete and validated full state7 ment of budget resources is ready by not later than Sep8 tember 30, 2014’’ after ‘‘validated as ready for audit by 

9 not later than September 30, 2017’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL GONZALEZ , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No s . 4D 17

- 2117 & 4D17

- 2118

[ July 19, 2018 ]

Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 47

- 2014

- CF

- 000347

- A and 47

- 2014

- CF

- 000745

- A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, T allahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

G ROSS , C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Corey MAJOR.

No. 98-KH-2171.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1999.

IN RE: Major, Corey; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “E” Number 368-924; to the *648Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 96KA-1214

Denied.

KIMBALL, J. not on panel.
123 STAT. 3478 PUBLIC LAW 111–120—DEC. 22, 2009 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4165: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Dec. 8, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 10, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–120 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To extend through December 31, 2010, the authority of the Secretary of the Army 

to accept and expend funds contributed by non-Federal public entities to expedite 

the processing of permits. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS. 

Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 

(33 U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 119 Stat. 2169; 120 Stat. 

318; 120 Stat. 3197; 121 Stat. 1067) is amended by striking ‘‘2009’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

Approved December 22, 2009. 

Dec. 22, 2009 

[H.R. 4165] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
#### The City of Kingman v. John J. Jones.

No. 16,333.

Criminal *Law*— Appeal—Time *of Filing Transcript.*Although an appeal from a conviction for the violation of a city ordinance was not properly perfected, the transcript not having •been filed within thirty days after the appeal was taken, the proceedings were examined and the ordinance, complaint and evidence found to be sufficient.

' Appeal from Kingman district court; Preston B. Gillett, judge.

Opinion filed June 5, 1909.

Affirmed.

*440S'. *D. LaFuze,*for the appellee.

*Frank L. Martin,*and *R. A. Campbell,*for the appellant.

*Per Curiam:*

This is an appeal from a judgment in the district court finding the defendant guilty of the violation of a city ordinance.

It appears from the abstract that the appeal was not properly perfected. Service of the notice of appeal was made and acknowledged February 3, 1908, and a transcript, with important requirements omitted, was filed in this court February 3, 1909. Section 284 of the criminal code requires that the transcript shall be filed within thirty days after the appeal is taken. *(The State v. McEwen, 12*Kan. 37, 38; *The State v. Furney,*40 Kan. 17.)

However, we have examined into the merits of the case and find, contrary to the contention of the appellant, that the complaint sufficiently charged the violation of the ordinance of the city; that the ordinance was within the power granted by the statute to the mayor and council of the city; and that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the finding and judgment of the court.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-120213) pertaining to the Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan and the Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated
February 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries, Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLPCertified Public AccountantsTampa, Florida


February 12, 2007
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connectionwith the Annual Report of International Smart Sourcing, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 29, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Michael Rakusin, Chief Financial Officer, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1.     | The report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | 2.     | The information contained   in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial   condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period   covered by the Report. |

|   | /s/Michael Rakusin      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|        |                         |
|   | Michael Rakusin         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | March 28, 2007          |
Before the First Division,

February 7, 1940

No. 43206.

#### Protests 991991-G, etc., of M. Zwiebel et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed in chief value of blown glass in the form of grape clusters and sprays and that they are constructed of materials similar to those contained in the merchandise involved in *Woolworth*v. *United States*(G. A. 8427, T. D. 38697) and *Baltimore & Ohio*v. *United States*(G. A. 8606, T. D. 39451) and that the issues are similar to those in Abstract 42424. From the record it was found that Abstract 42424 has no application to the merchandise in the case at bar. In the other two cases the articles were held not to be beads. On the record presented the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1518 as blown glass articles was sustained.