alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014039EN.01001901.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2013 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-165/12) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of support services for the purpose of developing an information technology infrastructure and e-government services in Albania - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Transparency - Obligation to state reasons)

2014/C 39/31

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Ettelbrück, Luxembourg) and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. van Nuffel and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision CMS/cms D(2012)/00008 of 8 February 2012 rejecting the applicants’ tender in the closed tendering procedure EuropeAid/131431/C/SER/AL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision CMS/cms D(2012)/00008 of 8 February 2012 rejecting tender submitted by European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE in the closed tendering procedure EuropeAid/131431/C/SER/AL; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision CMS/cms D(2012)/00008 of 8 February 2012 rejecting tender submitted by European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE in the closed tendering procedure EuropeAid/131431/C/SER/AL;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc.

|BRL Universal Equipment 2001 A, L.P.              |  | Delaware              
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Compression Services de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.      |  | Mexico                
|Compressor Systems International, Inc.            |  | Delaware              
|Enterra Compression Investment Company            |  | Delaware              
|Oceanic Compression Services, Pty. Ltd.           |  | Australia             
|PT Universal Compression Indonesia                |  | Indonesia             
|UC Canadian Partnership Holdings Company          |  | Nova Scotia           
|UC Canadian Partnership Minority Holdings Company |  | Nova Scotia           
|UCO Compression 2002 LLC                          |  | Delaware              
|UCO Compression Holding, L.L.C.                   |  | Delaware              
|Universal Compression (Australia) Pty,Ltd.        |  | Australia             
|Universal Compression (Ontario), Ltd.             |  | British Virgin Islands
|Universal Compression (Thailand), Ltd.            |  | Thailand              
|Universal Compression Argentina, SA               |  | Argentina             
|Universal Compression Bolivia LTDA                |  | Bolivia               
|Universal Compression Canada, Limited Partnership |  | Nova Scotia           
|Universal Compression Canadian Holdings, Inc.     |  | Delaware              
|Universal Compression de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.     |  | Mexico                
|Universal Compression de Venezuela Unicom, C.A.   |  | Venezuela             
|Universal Compression del Peru, S.R.L.            |  | Peru                  
|Universal Compression Finance Company, Ltd.       |  | Barbados              
|Universal Compression Holdings Canada Company     |  | Nova Scotia           
|Universal Compression International, Inc.         |  | Delaware              
|Universal Compression International, Ltd.         |  | Cayman Island         
|Universal Compression LTDA                        |  | Brazil                
|Universal Compression of Colombia, Ltd.           |  | Cayman Island         
|Universal Compression Services de Venezuela, C.A. |  | Venezuela             
|Universal Compression Services, LLC               |  | Delaware              
|Universal Compression, Inc.                       |  | Texas                 
|Uniwhale de Columbia E.U.                         |  | Cayman Island         
|Uniwhale Ltd.                                     |  | Cayman Island         

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.3

                                    AGREEMENT


     This Agreement is made as of January 16, 2008 by and between Innovex, Inc.,
a Minnesota corporation ("Innovex") and William P. Murnane ("Murnane").

     IT IS AGREED:

     1. Murnane shall serve as Chairman of the Board of Innovex for a period of
six months from the date hereof or until his earlier death or removal from such
position (the "Term").

     2. Murnane shall receive $10,000 per month for his service as Chairman of
the Board for each month in which Murnane provides services as the Chairman of
the Board during the Term.

     3. As additional consideration for Murnane's services to Innovex as its
Chairman of the Board, Innovex shall, promptly after the date of this Agreement,
transfer title to the Company vehicle utilized by Murnane in his service to
Innovex prior to the date of this Agreement. Such transfer will be without cost
to Murnane, although Murnane shall be responsible for all income taxes related
to such vehicle transfer and Innovex may withhold from amounts due Murnane any
taxes required to be withheld under applicable law arising from such transfer.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as of the date first
above written.

                                                     INNOVEX, INC.

Dated:  1/16/08                             By:  /s/Terry Dauenhauer
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                    Terry Dauenhauer
                                            Its:    President and CEO


Dated:  1/16/08                             By:  /s/William Murnane
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                    William Murnane
                                            Its:    Chairman of the Board
132 STAT. 1556 PUBLIC LAW 115–219—JULY 27, 2018 

Public Law 115–219 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project involving the Gibson Dam. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL 

ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT 

INVOLVING GIBSON DAM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period specified 

in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

project numbered 12478–003, the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, 

at the request of the licensee for the project, and after reasonable 

notice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 

interest requirements of, and the procedures of the Commission 

under, that section, extend the time period during which the 

licensee is required to commence construction of the project for 

not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods from the date of the 

expiration of the extension originally issued by the Commission. 

(b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If the period required for the commencement of construction of the project described in subsection 

(a) has expired prior to the date of enactment of this Act, 

the Commission may reinstate the license effective as of that 

date of expiration. 

Effective dates. 

Time period. 

July 27, 2018 

[S. 490] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
PUBLIC LAW 115–219—JULY 27, 2018 132 STAT. 1557 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 490: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 115–100 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

June 28, considered and passed Senate. 

July 16, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(2) EXTENSION.—If the Commission reinstates the license 

under paragraph (1), the first extension authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of that expiration. 

Approved July 27, 2018. 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry J. Boucher,Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

Theforegoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject toliability under this section. This certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expresslyincorporated by reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated: August 11, 2006 | /s/Henry J.  Boucher, Jr. |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                   | Henry J.  Boucher, Jr.    |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
Petition for Exemption

Luis Lopez

Luis Lopez Photography & Video

4102 Ida St

Longview, TX 75605

I, Luis Lopez, hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333.

I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, DJI Phantom 2 Professional 

Quad copter Aircraft, in order to provide services for profit to include aerial photography, 

aerial cinematography, aerial filming and photography for real estate, construction firms, 

aerial mapping, special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or public 

parties/events, business advertising, promotional events, geological surveying, and 

environmental studies.

The ability to provide these services to other local businesses and individuals in my

community will benefit them by opening up opportunities they otherwise did not have 

before. Traditional methods of aerial photography/videography are simply not viable 

options for the average consumer as they are costly and involve greater risks to everyone 

involved; i.e. the use of larger aircraft carrying humans and flammable fuel. By utilizing 

the UAV/UAS the same results can be achieved with much safer conditions.

Prior to each flight/operation of the UAV/UAS, I will conduct a Pre-Flight Safety

Inspection. 

Only the manufacturers authorized repair facilities/ providers will perform any and all 

repairs. Flights will not take place over densely populated areas or private property 

without the owner’s permission. The UAV/UAS will only be operated within visual line 

of sight and will not be flown near airports or above 400 feet. The FAA can be confident 

that operations of this UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent or greater level of 

safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Mr. Todd Thomas Drone Pics, and 

Mr. Mike Lloyd & Associates, all of who have received Section 333 exemptions for 

comparable aircraft for similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which I am seeking exemption are as follows:

14 C.F.R. Part 21;

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);

14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5);

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a);

14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c);

14 C.F.R 91.7(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2);

14C.F.R. 91.109(a);
14 C.F.R. 91.119;

14 C.F.R. 91.121;

14 C.F.R. 91.151(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 91.405(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1);

14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2};

14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Please find the included User Manual, Quick Start Guide and Smart Flight Battery Safety 

Guidelines

I truly thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Luis Lopez

Luis Lopez Photography & Video

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_2/en/PHANTOM2_User_Manual_v1.4_en.pdf

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_2/en/PHANTOM2_Quick_Start_Guide_en.pdf

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_2_vision_plus/Smart_Flight_Battery_Safety_Guid

elines.pdf
1

Rios, Gerardo

From: Steve Hill [SHill@sierraresearch.com]

Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 3:54 PM

To: Rios, Gerardo; David Jenkins (djenkins@apexpowergroup.com)

Cc: Kohn, Roger; Grubenstein@SierraResearch.com; Maggie Fitzgerald; Foster, Melissa A.; Hellwig, Kimberly J.; Moore, Steve

Subject: Pio Pico PSD Permit Application: PM2.5 BACT Update

Attachments: PM2 5 BACT letter.pdf

On August 16, 2013, Pio Pico submitted a letter (with enclosed discs containing electronic versions of source test reports) to EPA updating its analysis of BACT for 

the LMS100 combustion turbines at Pio Pico Energy Center. 

An electronic copy of that letter is attached. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 

--Steve Hill
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officer of Interplay  Entertainment  Corp., a Delaware  corporation
(the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify with respect to the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report") that:

(1)      the 10-K Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information  contained in the 10-K Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:    April 29, 2008

                                 /s/ Herve Caen
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 Herve Caen
                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                 Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.3


 


Summary of Terms of Verbal Consulting Agreement with Mark H. Kreloff


 


	
  Parties:

  	
  Fairground
  Media LLC and Mark H. Kreloff.

  
	
  Scope:

  	
  Mr. Kreloff
  is to provide consulting services to Fairground Media.

  
	
  Compensation:

  	
  $4,000/month.

  
	
  Term:

  	
  Month-to-month
  beginning in June 2007.
AAM-13-065-E

December 13, 2012

 Exemption No. 9831B

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0131

Mr. Alfred S. Reynolds

President

Maine Scenic Airways, Inc.

P.O. Box 1144

Belfast, ME 04915

Dear Mr. Reynolds:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9831, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 2, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Maine Scenic Airways (Maine Scenic) for an extension of Exemption No. 9831, 

as amended. That exemption from part 121, appendices I and J of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations allows Maine Scenic to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing 

program.

Although in the past you have requested relief from part 121, appendices I and J, the FAA 

finds that you now require relief from part 120. On May 14, 2009, the FAA published the 

“Drug and Alcohol Testing Program” final rule in the Federal Register (74 FR 22649). A 

copy is enclosed for you information.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.
2

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Maine Scenic.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9831, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, 

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Maine Scenic are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all 

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Maine Scenic part 135 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9831, as amended, to 

March 31, 2015 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Frederick E. Tilton, M.D.

Federal Air Surgeon
#### MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. Harriet BEARD, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Respondents.

No. 73174.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

July 28, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 30,1998.

Lewis C. Green, St. Louis, for plaintiffs-respondents/eross-appellants.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Deborah Neff, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendants-appellants/respondents.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Harriet Beard, David Crane, Michael Foresman, William Clark, Andrew Farmer, Missouri Department of Natural Resources and Air Conservation Commission of Missouri (commission), appeal from an order and judgment awarding reasonable attorney fees pursuant to Section 536.087 RSMo (1998 Supp.) in the amount of $37,000 to respondents, Missouri Coalition for the Environment and Wendy Pelton, for amounts expended in challenging commission’s grant of a variance of the opacity regulations to the U.S. Army. Respondents cross-appeal the denial of the additional attorney fees incurred in the litigation. The trial court found that respondents were “prevailing parties” entitled to reasonable attorney fees and expenses under Section 536.087 RSMo (1998 Supp.), because they successfully secured a vacation and remand of the decision of the commission with directions to receive and consider additional evidence. The attorney fees award was limited to the those which were directly attributable to the issues on which respondents actually prevailed. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. As an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Distribution’s Shird presented commander’s coin

By Brianne M. BenderDLA Distribution Command Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
Equal Employment Specialist Tommy Shird received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 26.

Shird has done a significant amount of community outreach to support higher-level EEO specialists who make sure the programs are ADA (Americans with Disability Act) compliant. 

“Tommy’s willingness to go the extra mile in coordinating special emphasis activities for the employees at DLA Distribution Headquarters is greatly appreciated,” said EEO Director Yvette Harris.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA Distributionawards
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2011-0551

Docket Number

2009-SW-13-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained 

in the Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter EASB 05.00.51, Rev. 3, dated August 18, 2008

Eurocopter EASB 05.35, Rev. 3, dated August 18, 2008

Eurocopter EASB 05.28, Rev. 3, dated August 18, 2008

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.