alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 49519.

#### Protest 97908-K of R. L. Paquin Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

An inspection of exhibit 1 showed it to consist of two sheets of paper, the outer sheet thicker than the inner one, which have been folded in half and then bound together on the side near the folded center with a narrow black ribbon, and having the appearance of a booklet or folder. On the front cover there is a picture of Christ and the words “In Memoriam.” On one side of the inside folded sheet are French words meaning “With the deepest sympathies of . . . .” On the other side of the same.sheet appear, also in French, words to the effect that Mass or Masses will be said for the repose of the soul of the deceased, whose name remains to be filled in. Plaintiff’s witness admitted that exhibit 1 is in the nature of a spiritual offering and stated that the plaintiff based its contention on a letter from the appraiser at Boston to the deputy collector at that port concerning advisory classification of some former importation. There was no testimony that the merchandise in both instances is identically the same. The advisory classification was held not binding on the collector who is the only classifying officer under the law. He further stated that exhibit 1 is not a gift card but an announcement card — that it is a booklet and not necessarily a folder. The Government called the examiner who passed the merchandise advisbrily and who stated that he knew of such a letter but that when the present merchandise came before him his opinion was different. He considered it a greeting card, which opinion was based on information obtained through the Customs Information Exchange. The court was of the opinion that the imported articles are not strictly greeting cards or gift cards but more properly announcement cards; and that as folders or booklets they might come within the *eo nomine*provision therefor in paragraph 1410, or as “booklets, printed lithographically or otherwise, not specially provided for,” or under the first provision in said paragraph, in which case the higher rate would be applicable under paragraph 1559. As the record failed to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the claim under paragraph 1410 was overruled.
(Reap. Dec. 9450)

#### Karl A. Neise *v.*United States

Entry No. 818707, etc.

*670(Decided June 4, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of this decision, were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### Samuel L. BAKER, Earl D. Baker and Paula Baker, Appellants, v. James C. NEWMAN and Ramell A. Newman, Appellees.

No. 98-2766.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 30, 1999.

Sandra Stockwell of Stowell, Anton & Kraemer, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Brian D. Hess, Panama City Beach, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM

AFFIRMED. *Terra Mar Capital, Inc. v. Auxier,*694 So.2d 779 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); *Alper v. LaFrancis,*155 So.2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963).

BOOTH, MINER AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ„ CONCUR.
John Morton Shannon, P.Geo.


AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Limited,
 Suite 200 - 200 Granville Street,
 Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1S4
     To the Board of Directors of Rubicon Minerals Corporation (the “Company”)
     I, John Morton Shannon, hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this annual report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the technical report titled “F2 Gold System - Phoenix Gold Project Bateman Township Red Lake, Canada Technical Report” dated effective August 8th 2011 (the “Technical Report”) and to extracts from, or a summary of, the Technical Report in the written disclosure contained in the Company’s annual information form for the financial year ended December 31, 2012 dated March 12th, 2013.
   Dated as of this 12th day of March, 2013
    Original signed by:
   “/s/ John Morton Shannon”
   John Morton Shannon, P.Geo.
 Principal Geologist and Geology Manager
 AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Limited
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, John W. Peters, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: May 9 , 2007 /s/ John W, Peters John W. Peters Principal Executive Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# June 2019 New Employee Orientation

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
New Employee Orientation will be June 26 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. and June 27 from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. in the Building 20 Buckeye Room.

New associates to the Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime and from all local DLA hosted tenants, military and interns are welcome to attend.  To register, call 614-692-6824.

Starting a new job can be confusing and stressful.  During orientation, there’ll be presentations from various organizations that will provide guidance and support to help you become acclimated to your new organization and embrace your new career.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Building Connections L&MCulture L&MDLA L&Mnew employee L&MPACER/Intern L&MResource the Enterprise L&M
# C_2013367EN.01002802.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/28

---

Order of the General Court of 24 October 2013 — Stromberg Menswear v OHIM — Leketoy Stormberg Inter (STORMBERG)

(Case T-457/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Community word mark STORMBERG - Appeal against the request for conversion of a Community trade mark into national trade mark applications - Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 367/51

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stromberg Menswear Ltd (Leeds, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Tsoutsanis, lawyer, and C. Tulley, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Leketoy Stormberg Inter AS (Kristiansand S, Norway) (represented initially by T. Mølsgaard, and subsequently by J. Løje, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 August 2012 (Case R 428/2012-4), relating to the request for conversion of a Community trade mark into national trade mark applications submitted by Leketoy Stormberg Inter AS.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Stromberg Menswear Ltd shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Stromberg Menswear Ltd shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.

1

---
Before the First Division,

September 25, 1940

No. 44361.

#### Protests 825017-G, etc., of McKesson Wholesalers et al. (Minneapolis, etc.).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
No. 49523.

#### Protest 106878-K of Pan American Products Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When called for trial the case was submitted without the introduction of evidence to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was overruled.
123 STAT. 3024 PUBLIC LAW 111–112—NOV. 30, 2009 

Public Law 111–112 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the authority for relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees, 

and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST PROGRAMS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5739 of title 5, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (3); 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘or extended’’ after ‘‘approved’’; and 

(B) by inserting ‘‘or extension’’ after ‘‘of the program’’; 

(3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(c)(1) An agency authorized to conduct a test program under 

subsection (a) shall annually submit a report on the results of 

the program to date to the Administrator. 

‘‘(2) Not later than 3 months after completion of a test program, 

the agency conducting the program shall submit a final report 

on the results of the program to the Administrator and the appropriate committees of Congress.’’; 

(4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘10’’ and inserting ‘‘12’’; 

and 

(5) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(e)(1) The Administrator may not approve any test program 

for an initial period of more than 4 years. 

‘‘(2)(A) Upon the request of the agency administering a test 

program, the Administrator may extend the program. 

‘‘(B) An extension under subparagraph (A) may not exceed 

4 years. 

‘‘(C) The Administrator may exercise more than 1 extension 

under subparagraph (A) with respect to any test program.’’. 

Deadlines. 

Reports. 

Nov. 30, 2009 

[S. 1825] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLIC LAWS
PUBLIC LAW 111–112—NOV. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 3025 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1825: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Nov. 16, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect on 

December 18, 2009. 

Approved November 30, 2009. 

5 USC 5739 note. 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLIC LAWS
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Earnings of Women in Selected Manufacturing Industries, 1946

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Earnings of Women in Selected Manufacturing Industries, 1946 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 219*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1948,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5490,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 7, 2007. 

**A Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Donna J. Ward, Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                 

*1. Susi Covolik, Omaha, Nebraska;*                     to retain voting shares of Clearwater Development Co., Inc., and thereby indirectly retain shares of Citizens State Bank, both in Clearwater, Nebraska.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 18, 2007. 

Jennifer J. Johnson, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. E7-9935 Filed 05-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
# C_2013252EN.01005102.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/51

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 8 May 2013 — FK (*1) v Commission

(Case F-87/12) (1)

(Civil Service - Temporary staff - Renewal of contract - Annulment in part - Review)

(2013/C 252/94)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: FK (*1) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, A. Coolen and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision to limit the extension period of the applicant’s contract.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | FK (*1) shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

FK (*1) shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  
  OJ C 319, 20.10.2012, p. 19.

---
S I 0-100401-00 2



### .^^M^co^ ^ 

## PITTSBURG H INTERNATIONA L AlMPOU' i '^7^ ^ March 23 , 201 0 AJk;}4l)fii y (.Oimt y Airpor t Authorit y l.atuKicIt-'It-rrninal . ifh l-loo r Vlcz/ . P.O . IJo x 123~l l i'iitsburgU , P

A l=>2il-0:^7 0 

### rmvfiyPinsburglfc,.-^

The Honorabl e Raymon dH . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jersey Ave , S E Washington , D C 1Q59 ^ Docke t DOT-OST.2010-^B b Dea r Mr . Secretary ; J Than k you fo r th e opportunit

y t o expres s ou

r suppor t fo r th e applicatio n fo

r antitrus t immunit y and propose djoin t

busines s agreemen t

filedb y America

n Airline s an d Japa

n Airlines . The propose dallianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo r oneworl d t o compet e effectively wit h th e Sta r andSk y Tea malliance . Thi s increase d interallianc e compeiilio n will i n tur n enhanc e the benefit s o f

th e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y - first b y solidifyin g U.S.-Japa

n Open Skies , then b y servin g a s afoundatio n fo r furthe r liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte r athoroug h review , w e encourag e th e Department o f Transportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i

t woul denabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel y togethe r

to deliver highly competitiv e air

transportatio n services . Approva l fo r AA/JAL allianc e wil l hav e a positiv e impac t

on ai r trave l b y offerin g customer s more service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an d wil l help t o ensure tha t customer s continu e to benefit fro mhavin g thre e competitiv e ai r alliance s t o choos e from . 1 urg e yo u t o quickl y approv e thi s application . Sincerely , Jiraale y D . Penrod , A.A.E . Executiv e Director/CE O BDP/pa r
No. 42122.

#### Protests 778325-G, etc., of S. Galle & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.
No. 96-217.

#### Abraham, District Attorney, Philadelphia County, et al. *v.*Young.

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGARDING
            FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS


I, Stephen D. Wilson state and certify as follows:

         The financial statements filed with the report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2003 fully comply with the requirements of Sections
13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in said periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of California Clean Air, Inc.

         This Statement is submitted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



Dated: May 15, 2003                                  /s/ STEPHEN D. WILSON