alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1815 

To codify and delay the implementation of and compliance dates for a final 

rule relating to interstate transport of air pollution. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2011 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. PRYOR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To codify and delay the implementation of and compliance 

dates for a final rule relating to interstate transport 

of air pollution. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cross State Air Pollu5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERSTATE AIR POLLUTION. 

7 (a) CODIFICATION.—Notwithstanding any other pro8 vision of law, subject to subsection (b), the final rule enti9 tled ‘‘Federal Implementation Plans: Interstate Transport 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1815 IS

1 of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of 

2 SIP Approvals’’ (76 Fed. Reg. 48208 (August 8, 2011)), 

3 is enacted into law. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATES.—The effective date of the 

5 final rule enacted by subsection (a) (or any update by the 

6 Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency of 

7 a requirement or standard established under that final 

8 rule) shall be— 

9 (1) for phase I sulfur dioxide and annual nitro10 gen oxide reductions, January 1, 2012; 

11 (2) for ozone season nitrogen oxide reductions, 

12 May 1, 2012; and 

13 (3) for phase II sulfur dioxide reductions, Janu14 ary 1, 2015. 

15 (c) COMPLIANCE DATES.—The date by which compli16 ance shall be required under the final rule, or an update, 

17 referred to in subsection (b) shall be— 

18 (1) for requirements described in paragraphs 

19 (1) and (2) of subsection (b), April 1, 2014, and an20 nually thereafter; and 

21 (2) for requirements described in subsection 

22 (b)(3), April 1, 2016, and annually thereafter. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-83763) pertaining to the Employee Stock Options held by
Michael P. Wallis; Form S-8 (No. 333-83829) pertaining to the IVI Checkmate
Electronics, Inc. 401(K) Plan; Form S-8 No. 333-32366 pertaining to the Plourde
Computer Services, Inc. 1996 Key Management Stock Option Plan; Form S-8 (No.333-
32382) pertaining to the Employee Stock Options held by R. Lee Paulson; Form S-8
No. (333-65749) pertaining to the Plourde Computer Services, Inc. 1991 Stock
Option Plan; Form S-8 (No. 333-65259) pertaining to the IVI Checkmate Corp. 1998
Long-Term Incentive Plan and the IVI Checkmate Corp. Amended and Restated 1998
Directors Stock Option Plan; the Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-53629) pertaining to the Checkmate
Electronics, Inc. 1988 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan, Checkmate
Electronics, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan, Checkmate Electronics, Inc. 1994
Director's Stock Option Plan, International Verifact Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan
and Checkmate Electronics, Inc. Non-Incentive Stock Option Agreement; and the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Form S-4 Registration Statement on Form S-
3 (No. 333-53629); pertaining to the registration of shares of common stock for
issuance upon the exchange of exchangeable shares, of our report dated February
12, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IVI Checkmate
Corp. in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                         /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND

Toronto, Ontario
March 27, 2000
Case No. 9,304.

#### In re MAUER.

[5 Sawy. 66.] 1

District Court, D. Nevada.

Jan. 17, 1878.

BAXKKUPrcr— Petition axd *Schedules*— Verifi*cation*before Notary.

The petition and schedules may be verified before the attorney of the debtor, he being a notary public.

In this matter the debtor [Henry Mauer] verified his petition and schedules before his. attorney who was a notary public. The register deeming such verification irregular, certified the question for decision.^

E. B. Stonehill, for debtor.

No one in opposition.

HILLXER, District Judge.

The rule that affidavits taken before the attorney in a cause cannot be read is an old rule of practice in the courts of king’s bench and exchequer in England. It is a technical rule and is limited in actions at law to the attorney on the record, and in equity cases to the solicitor. People v. Spalding, 2 Paige, 326. It does not apply to an affidavit taken before counsel in the suit (Willard v. Judd, 15 Johns. 531), nor to a solicitor who was not named on the record though a partner of the solicitors of record (Hallenback v. Whitaker, 17 Johns. 2). The rule ought not to be extended to cases where the notary is called upon to do a merely ministerial act in which no exercise of judgment or discretion is required, such as swearing a party to the truth of a bill, or petition, or answer. McLaren v. Charrier, 5 Paige, 530. Although the attorney is the legal adviser of the deponent the affidavit may be read if he is not attorney on the record. Williams v. Hockin, 8 Taunt 435. The rule is further limited to affidavits taken in a cause pending. It does not extend to those taken preparatory to the beginning of one. Vary v. Godfrey, 6 Cow. 587. Affidavits to hold to bail taken before the cause was commenced were held sufficient in Haward v. Nalder, Barnes’ Notes Cas. 60, and it has always been the practice in the English courts to permit affidavits of service of process to be *1163sworn to before the attorney in the cause, and also proof of service of the declaration in ejectment. Doe v. Roe, 2 Younge & J. 284; Steph. N. P. 1440.

The affidavits in this matter were not taken in a cause pending, and hence are not to be rejected, as the authorities show. The petition, schedules and inventory must all be made out and verified before being filed and before any bankruptcy proceeding is begun. X am not disposed to extend the rule beyond the cases cited. There is no reason to suspect the least improper influence over the affiant, or to doubt that if these verifications were held bad for the reason assigned the debtor would swear to the same thing immediately before some other officer.

The clerk will certify this decision to the register.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Distribution commanding officer speaks at local MOAA event

By Dawn BonsellDLA Distribution Public Affairs

                CAMP HILL, Pa.  –              
Navy Rear Admiral Kevin M. Jones, Commander, DLA Distribution recently spoke at the Keystone Capital Chapter of the Military Officers Association of America (MOAA) event in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania. 

The MOAA Keystone Capital Chapter is comprised of military officers from all branches of military service and many are previous employees of DLA Distribution in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania. RDML Jones provided a presentation highlighting the mission and latest achievements of DLA Distribution and also provided photos and a description of the new LEED Certified DLA Distribution Headquarters building.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionDistributionMilitary Officers Association of AmericaMOAAKeystone Capital Chapter
Exhibit
10.4


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO


THE WASHINGTON SAVINGS BANK, F.S.B. NON-EMPLOYEE
DIRECTORS’


STOCK OPTION PLAN


 


                                WSB Holdings, Inc.
sponsors The Washington Savings Bank, F.S.B. Non-Employee Directors’ Stock
Option Plan (the “Plan”).  The Plan is
hereby amended as set forth below:


 


1.               All references to “The
Washington Savings Bank, F.S.B.” and “WSB” shall be replaced with and refer to “WSB
Holdings, Inc.”


 


2.               Except as amended above, the
Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WSB Holdings, Inc.
has executed this Plan Amendment Number 1 to The Washington Savings Bank,
F.S.B. Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan as of this 16th day of
January, 2008.


 


 


	
   

  	
  WSB
  Holdings, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Phillip C. Bowman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Phillip C. Bowman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  



 


 


	
  ATTEST:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Cheryl Golden
#### Wimelbacher & Rice, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7651.

Invoices dated Montreal, Canada, September 19, 1947, etc.

Certified October 10, 1947, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 21, 1947, etc.

Entry Nos. 725981; 725980; 718631.

(Decided January 26, 1949)

*Brooks & Brooks (Frederick W. Brooks*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*390Mollison, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed above is the same in all material respects as the issues decided in C. J. Tower *&*Sons *v.*United States, R. D. 7624, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> ■ IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise involved in these cases, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6632

THOMAS D. CROOKS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL W. MOORE, South Carolina Department of Corrections; RICKIE HARRISON, Warden; BOB STEWART, Chief, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division; LEON LOTT, Sheriff of Richland County; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-2458-2-17AJ) Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas D. Crooks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Larry C. Batson, Sr., Lesli Brown Darwin, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Thomas D. Crooks, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Crooks v. Moore , No. CA-98-2458-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2014462EN.01000402.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 October 2014 — Gérard Buono and Others (C-12/13 P) and Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens and Others (C-13/13 P) v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-12/13 P and C-13/13 P) (1)

1

((Appeals - Common fisheries policy - Fishing quotas - Emergency measures adopted by the Commission - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU - Conditions - Actual and certain harm))

(2014/C 462/06)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Gérard Buono, Jean-Luc Buono, Roger Louis Paul Del Ponte, Serge Antoine Di Rocco, Jean Gérald Lubrano, Jean Lubrano, Jean Lucien Lubrano, Fabrice Marin, Robert Marin (represented by: A. Arnaud and P.-O. Koubi-Flotte, avocats) (C-12/13 P), Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens, Marc Carreno, Jean Louis Donnarel, Jean-François Flores, Gérald Jean Lubrano, Hervé Marin, Nicolas Marin, Sébastien Marin, Jean-Marc Penniello, Serge Antoine José Perez (represented by: C. Bonnefoi, avocate) (C-13/13 P)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals brought in Cases C-12/13 P and C-13/13 P; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals brought in Cases C-12/13 P and C-13/13 P;

| 2. | Orders Gérard Buono, Jean-Luc Buono, Roger Del Ponte, Serge Antoine Di Rocco, Jean Gérald Lubrano, Jean Lubrano, Jean Lucien Lubrano, Fabrice Marin and Robert Marin to pay the costs in Case C-12/13 P and the Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens, Marc Carreno, Jean-Louis Donnarel, Jean-François Flores, Gérald Jean Lubrano, Hervé Marin, Nicolas Marin, Sébastien Marin and Serge Antoine José Perez to pay the costs in Case C-13/13 P. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gérard Buono, Jean-Luc Buono, Roger Del Ponte, Serge Antoine Di Rocco, Jean Gérald Lubrano, Jean Lubrano, Jean Lucien Lubrano, Fabrice Marin and Robert Marin to pay the costs in Case C-12/13 P and the Syndicat des thoniers méditerranéens, Marc Carreno, Jean-Louis Donnarel, Jean-François Flores, Gérald Jean Lubrano, Hervé Marin, Nicolas Marin, Sébastien Marin and Serge Antoine José Perez to pay the costs in Case C-13/13 P.

---

(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.

1

---
# C_2012331EN.01003101.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/31

---

Action brought on 6 September 2012 — Cosma Moden v OHIM — s.Oliver Bernd Freier (COSMA)

(Case T-399/12)

(2012/C 331/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Cosma Moden GmbH & Co. KG (Emsdetten, Germany) (represented by: J. Meyer, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: s.Oliver Bernd Freier GmbH & Co. KG (Rottendorf, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 July 2012 in Case R 2010/2010-4 in respect of Community trade mark application No 6 593 479 and alter that decision to the effect that the appeal is well founded and that the opposition must as a result also be rejected as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 July 2012 in Case R 2010/2010-4 in respect of Community trade mark application No 6 593 479 and alter that decision to the effect that the appeal is well founded and that the opposition must as a result also be rejected as to the remainder;

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark including the word element ‘COSMA’ for goods and services in Classes 24, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 6 593 479

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: s.Oliver Bernd Freier GmbH & Co. KG

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the figurative mark including the word element ‘comma’ and the national word mark ‘comma’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 6, 9, 14, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28 and 35

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28518-28519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-030-1310-DB]


Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement, Atlantic Rim Natural Gas Field 
Development Project, Carbon County, WY

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Record of Decision (ROD) 
for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Atlantic Rim 
Natural Gas Field Development Project, Carbon County, Wyoming.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the availability of 
the ROD for the Atlantic Rim Natural Gas Field Development Project, 
Carbon County, Wyoming.

ADDRESSES: The ROD will be available electronically on the following 
Web site: http://www.blm.gov/wy/st/en/info/

[[Page 28519]]

NEPA/rfodocs/atlantic--rim.html. Copies of the ROD are also available 
for public inspection at the following BLM office locations:
    <bullet> Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State Office, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.
    <bullet> Bureau of Land Management, Rawlins Field Office, 1300 N. 
Third Street, Rawlins, Wyoming 82301.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Simons, Project Leader, Rawlins 
Field Office, P.O. Box 2407, Rawlins, Wyoming 82301, telephone (307) 
328-4328.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This ROD addresses the Atlantic Rim Natural 
Gas Field Development Project, located in Carbon County, Wyoming. The 
Atlantic Rim project encompasses approximately 270,080 acres, of which 
173,672 acres are Federal surface (179,438 acres Federal minerals) 
administered by the BLM Rawlins Field Office; 14,060 acres are State of 
Wyoming lands (12,384 acres State of Wyoming minerals); and 82,348 
acres are private surface (78,258 acres private minerals). Copies of 
the ROD have been sent to affected Federal, State, and local government 
agencies and interested parties.

    January 31, 2007.
Donald A. Simpson,
Associate State Director.
 [FR Doc. E7-9685 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9938]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-966-1420-BJ-TRST] Group No. 177, Wisconsin


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey; Wisconsin.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:

 Township 46 North, Range 3 West, of the Fourth Principal Meridian, 
Wisconsin

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion 
of the west boundary, a portion of the subdivisional lines, and the 
north and south center line of section 18; and the survey of the 
subdivision of section 18 and was approved May 11, 2007. We will place 
a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available 
to the public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the 
plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

     Dated: May 14, 2007.
Joseph W. Beaudin,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor (acting).
 [FR Doc. E7-9938 Filed 5-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
No. 74-971.

#### Board of Education of the City School District of New York *v.*Newman.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.