alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<CIK>                                               0001057051
<NAME>                                    Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P.

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                        78,368,723
<SECURITIES>                                                   7,617,170
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    255,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              86,241,742
<PP&E>                                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                86,241,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         11,935,319
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    74,306,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  86,241,742
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              (1,265,685)
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               1,970,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (3,236,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (3,236,003)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     (48.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0


</TABLE>
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Dunlap.Edward <edward.dunlap@orbitalatk.com>

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 1:38 PM

To: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Cc: Whitney.Diana

Subject: Re: Petition for Exemption: Orbi tal Sciences Corporation (FAA-2013-0779)

Dear Nia,

This to confirm that we have received approval for our simulator and no longer require this exemption request.

Thank you for following up.

Best regards

,

Ed Dunlap

Orbital ATK

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 13, 2016, at 6:07 AM, " Nia.Daniels@faa.gov " < Nia.Daniels@faa.gov > wrote:

Mr. Dunlap,

We have received your petition for an extension of Exemption No. 10918. You are currently qualified by

the FAA, and no longer need the exemption.

As such, I am contacting you to withdraw your extension request from the docket. You can do so by

replying to this email, stating that you no longer need the exemption.

Thank you,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267

‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267

‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov



### Notice: This e-mail is intended solely for use of the indi vidual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain

information that is proprietary, privilege d and exempt from disclosure under a pplicable law. If the reader is not

the intended recipient or agent respon sible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby

notified that any dissemination, distri bution or copying of this communicati on is strictly prohibited. This

communication may also contain data subject to U.S. expor t laws. If so, that data s ubject to the International

Traffic in Arms Regulation cannot be disseminated, distributed or copied to foreign na tionals, residing in the

U.S. or abroad, absent the express pr ior approval of the U.S. Department of State. If you have received this2 

### communication in error, please notif y the sender by reply e-mail and destroy the e-mail message and any

physical copies made of th e communication. Thank you.

********** **********
# C_2014315EN.01002401.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/24

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Sysmex Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

(Case C-480/13) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Tariff classification - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 3204, 3212 and 3822 - Substance producing, by chemical reaction and exposure to a laser light, a fluorescent effect intended for the analysis of white blood cells))

2014/C 315/35

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sysmex Europe GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1810/2004 of 7 September 2004, must be interpreted as meaning that a product, composed of solvents and of a polymethine-based substance, which, although it may have a weak and non-permanent dyeing effect on textiles, is not in practice used for its dyeing properties and is intended exclusively for the analysis of white blood cells, by means of the deposition of ions in defined components of those blood cells, which, when exposed to laser light, become fluorescent for a limited period, comes under heading 3822 of the Combined Nomenclature relating to laboratory reagents.

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.

1

---
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP











Consent of Independent Auditors





We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of our reports dated January 20, 2011 with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Nordion Inc. (formerly MDS Inc.) (the “Company”) as at October 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended October 31, 2010 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Company as at October 31, 2010, which appear in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders.





We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated January 20, 2011 in the following Registration Statements of the Company:





1.
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12058),


2.
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-12548),


3.
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13538), and


4.
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-170783).








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Chartered Accountants


Licensed Public Accountants





Ottawa, Canada


January 20, 2011
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Human Nutrition 
-  Diet, Genomics and Immunology Lab 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search  UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">		You are here: 						Research / 																				**Research Project:**Chromium and Cinnamon Effects on Insulin Sensitivity
**Location: Diet, Genomics and Immunology Lab**
**2008 Annual Report**
**1a.Objectives (from AD-416)**													The objective of this work is to determine the combined effects of aqueous extracts of cinnamon and chromium on glucose and insulin and related variables.						
**1b.Approach  (from AD-416)**													TANG-AN will be responsible for developing products containing chromiun and cinnamon for testing in cell culture and animal and human studies.  These products will be produced and tested in collaboration with ARS.  ARS will assist with the characterization of the products used for testing in cell cultures, rats, and humans.  Methods will be developed to quantitate the type-A polyphenols in the aqueous cinnamon extracts and existing methods will be used to quantitate the amount of chromium.  Joint human studies will be conducted with the selection of the subjects and initial testing in the laboratory of TANG-AN with additional analyses in the ARS laboratory.  All manuscripts will be with the approval of both parties.						
**3.Progress Report**													This Trust Agreement was designed to determine the individual and combined effects of cinnamon and chromium on glucose, insulin, and related variables.  The beneficial effects of cinnamon are postulated to be related to the amounts and types of type-A polymers present.  Therefore, studies were conducted to determine the amounts and types of type A polymers present in different cinnamons and effects on content of various methods of extraction.  Cinnamaldehyde and coumarin contents of the various extracts were also evaluated.  The best effects were observed using aqueous extracts with minimal heat.  Monitoring activities include emails, phone calls, and at least two meetings each year between the lead scientist from the company in China and the USDA to discuss and evaluate the results.  Biweekly group meetings are also held at Beltsville to evaluate the progress of the research.						
    Project TeamAnderson, Richard  
Project Annual Reports FY 2009 FY 2008 
Related National Programs Human Nutrition(107)  							Last Modified: 05/02/2010 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
No. 95-1864.

#### Ellerbee *v.*Mills.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7648.

Invoices dated Montreal, Canada, December 1, 1947, etc.

Certified December 3, 1947, etc.

Entered at Malone, N. Y., December 8, 1947, etc.

Entry Nos. B-945; B-741.

(Decided January 24, 1949)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Charles J. Miville,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in C. J. Tower & Sons v. United States, R. D. 7624, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise involved in each of the cases enumerated in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry • because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

*388On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 56735.

protests 179783-K, etc. (New York).

#### Herzman Scarfs, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6866.

Entry Nos. 727160; 702241.

Invoices dated Nottingham, England, February 10, 1944, etc.

Certified February 10, 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 10, 1944, etc.

(Decided February 13, 1947)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The two appeals listed above have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved *in United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise to be the values found by the appraiser, less any additions made by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar eases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, DOUGLAS C. BEATTY, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the second quarterof 2003 of Nortel Networks Limited;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 11, 2003   “DOUGLAS C. BEATTY”
No. 54373.

#### John J. Ward, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 156496-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Roovers Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 53, C. D. 1190). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
No. 96-116.

#### AutoZone, Inc. *v.*National Labor Relations Board et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Laurence S. Geller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 24, 2010



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/S/    LAURENCE S.
GELLER                 
|Laurence S. Geller Chief Executive Officer
#### MATLACK v. BROWN AND LEWIS.

October 15, 1836.

*Verdict subject to opinion of court.*

*A,*brings replevin against B., who avows, &c. Distress for rent claimed, §200. Verdict for §100. The jurisdiction of this court is not ousted, and plaintiff is entitled to costs.

GOODS were distrained by Brown for $200, arrears of rent claimed by him. Matlack replevied. Defendant Lewis made-cognizance, and defendant Brown avowed for rent in arrear, due by one Joseph West, lessee of the premises from which the goods mentioned in the declaration were taken.

Plaintiff replied “ no rent in arrear.”

On the trial it appeared, that but $100 were due at the time of the distress, although the landlord supposed himself entitled to *16§200. Verdict taken by consent for avowant f 100, subject to the opinion of the court whether judgment should be entered with or without costs.

*Hopkins*

said, that the verdict established that this court had not jurisdiction. The amount recovered did not “ exceed one hundred dollars.” Act 30th March, 1811, *Purd. Dig., tit. Courts.*

*S. G. Campbell,*

*contra,*cited: Ancora *v.*Burns, 5 *Binney 522;*Byrne *v.*Gordon, *2 Browne,*271.

Per Curiam.—

Whenever this court has jurisdiction, the judgment carries costs. Kline *v.*Woods, 9 *S.*& *R.*299. Plaintiff having elected to bring replevin in this court, it is *not in his*power to say the court has no jurisdiction. In fact, the claim was for §200, and the verdict of the jury finding but §100 due, will not oust the court of jurisdiction.

Judgment for avowant with costs.
No. 54369.

#### Finland Ceramics & Glass Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 80779-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case No. 9,293.

#### MATTINGLY v. SMITH.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 158.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1818.

Arrest — Civil—Capias ad Satisfaciendum — Insolvency.

The court will not. on motion, quash a ca. sa. issued by the clerk of this court upon a judgment of a justice of the peace, upon the ground that the defendant had applied for the benefit of the insolvent laws of Maryland, and had obtained an order, and given bond, for his appearance in St. Mary’s county. Maryland, but had not yet obtained his final discharge.

The defendant moved the court to quash a ca. sa. issued by the clerk of this court upon the judgment of a justice of the peace, because he had applied for the benefit of the insolvent laws of Maryland, where he resided, and had obtained an order, and given bond for his appearance in St. Mary’s county, by which he is protected from arrest in Maryland, but had not yet obtained his final discharge.

THE COURT

overruled the motion, and refused to quash the ca. sa.
# C_2014282EN.01003001.xml

| 25.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2014 — Pågen Trademark v OHIM (gifflar)

(Case T-520/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for the Community figurative mark gifflar - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctiveness - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2014/C 282/39

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pågen Trademark AB (Malmö, Sweden) (represented by: J. Norderyd, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Leffler and P. Geroulakos, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 September 2012 (Case R 46/2012-2), concerning an application for registration of the figurative mark gifflar as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pågen Trademark AB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pågen Trademark AB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.

1

---