alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Chapal Donner Corp. *v.*United States

No. 6869.

Entry No. 767130.

Invoice dated London, England, May 15, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 10, 1946.

(Decided February 13, 1947)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Eicwall, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is as follows:

> *Halters fur waste*

> (Mixed rabbit pieces) 5J4d. per lb.

> (Beaver rabbit pieces) *5%d.*per lb.

> (Natural rabbit pieces) l/5d. per lb.

> (Raw rabbit pieces) l/5d. per lb.

> Plus packing as invoiced

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher export value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as follows:

> *Sterling per pound*

> Mixed rabbit pieces 5)4 pence

> Beaver rabbit pieces 5]4 pence

> Natural rabbit pieces 1 shilling 5 pence

> Raw rabbit pieces 1 shilling 5 pence

> Plus packing as invoiced

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999

Commission File Number: 33-48-48-1-06

Nomura Asset Securities Corporation issuer in respect of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1998-D6
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			13-3672336
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

Two World Financial Center, Building B,
New York, NY 10281
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

212-667-9300
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 1999.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
1999.

Not applicable.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1523 

To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from ordering any employer 

to close, relocate, or transfer employment under any circumstance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2011 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit the National Labor Relations Board from ordering any employer to close, relocate, or transfer employment under any circumstance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Jobs From 

5 Government Interference Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF THE NLRB. 

7 Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act 

8 (29 U.S.C. 160) is amended by inserting before the period 

9 at the end the following: ‘‘: Provided further, That the 

10 Board shall have no power to order an employer (or seek 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1523 IS

1 an order against an employer) to restore or reinstate any 

2 work, product, production line, or equipment, to rescind 

3 any relocation, transfer, subcontracting, outsourcing, or 

4 other change regarding the location, entity, or employer 

5 who shall be engaged in production or other business oper6 ations, or to require any employer to make an initial or 

7 additional investment at a particular plant, facility, or lo8 cation’’. 

9 SEC. 3. RETROACTIVITY. 

10 The amendment made by section 2 shall apply to any 

11 complaint for which a final adjudication by the National 

12 Labor Relations Board has not been made by the date 

13 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2013046EN.01002102.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/21

---

Action brought on 18 December 2012 — Teva Pharma and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe v EMA

(Case T-547/12)

2013/C 46/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Teva Pharma BV (Utrecht, Netherlands); and Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV (Utrecht) (represented by: K. Bacon and D. Piccinin, Barristers, G. Morgan and C. Drew, Solicitors)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the European Medicines Agency, contained in its letter of 26 November 2012, refusing to validate the applicants’ application for a marketing authorisation for its generic version of abacavir/lamivudine; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Medicines Agency, contained in its letter of 26 November 2012, refusing to validate the applicants’ application for a marketing authorisation for its generic version of abacavir/lamivudine; and

| — | Order the European Medicines Agency to pay the applicants’ costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Medicines Agency to pay the applicants’ costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on one plea in law, alleging that the refusal to validate their application for the authorisation of a generic version of a fixed dose combination medicinal product, on the basis that the product was protected by a ten year period of exclusivity is contrary to Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (1) and Directive No 2001/83/EC (2) properly interpreted. In particular, the applicants contend that the marketing authorisation holder for the product is not entitled to enjoy a ten year period of data exclusivity, as the product is a fixed dose combination combining two active substances which have been supplied and used within the EU as components of a number of different medicinal products for some years. The applicants therefore contend that the product falls within the same global marketing authorisation as the earlier marketing authorisations for its component parts within the meaning of the second sub-paragraph of Article 6(1) of Directive No 2001/83. Accordingly, the applicants state that it did not enjoy any further period of data exclusivity after the expiry of the data exclusivity relating to these authorisations.

1

2

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (Text with EEA relevance)

1

(2)  Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use

2

---
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - CWPPRA, Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act

#  CWPPRA, Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Sep, 2018

**Description:**
The Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act, (CWPPRA pronounced kwǐp-rŭh), is federal legislation enacted in 1990 that is designed to identify, prepare, and fund construction of coastal wetlands restoration projects. Since its inception, 210 coastal restoration or protection projects have been authorized, benefiting approximately 100,000 acres in Louisiana.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

**Contributor:**    	    Louisiana State Government,     	    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,     	    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,     	    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,     	    U.S. Department of Agriculture,     	    National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (8 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://www.flickr.com/photos/cwppra/sets/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://cwppra.wordpress.com/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/CWPPRA/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/CWPPRA/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.instagram.com/cwppra_outreach/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.lacoast.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.linkedin.com/company/cwppra/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/CWPPRAclips/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (8 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
IWC 12

- 16: Zero-Liquid Discharge System at Progress Energy Mayo Generation

Station Matthias Loewenberg, GEA Process Engineering Inc., Colum bia, MD

Progress Energy is currently installing a new Zero-Liquid Discharge treatment system

for Flue-Gas Desulfurization Waste Water at their Ma yo Generation Station in Roxboro NC. The system, designed and supplied by GEA Progress Engi neering Inc., helps Progress Energy’s continuous commitment to provide safe, reliable and environmental friendly energy generation. The Zero-Liquid Discharge addi tion to their existing FGD scrubber supports compliance with tight NPDES wastewater discharge regulations. The Partial Zero-Liquid Discharge system consists of proven falling film evaporator technology with a secondary forced circulation evaporat or in order to reduce the FGD blow down volume significantly. The resulting concentrat ed brine will be mixed with Plant fly ash and disposed in a new on-site landfill. The distillate water will be used in the Plant systems, reducing the make-up water demand.

Numerous treatment options were considered for this fac ility, however ZLD was chosen based on multi-pollutant removal ability, proven technolo gy, and cost. This paper will outline the methodology behind the selection of this Part ial Zero-Liquid Discharge approach with respect to environmental compliance.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-121013 and333-102896), Form S-4 (No. 333-116378) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-119094, 333-118058, 333-106383, 333-66346 and 333-43612) of RITA Medical Systems, Inc. of our report dated April 29, 2005 relating to management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

April 29, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Form 10-QSB of C&D Production  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard O. Hassan,
Jr., President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on
my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 13, 2003


/s/ RICHARD O. HASSAN, JR.
______________________________________
Richard O. Hassan, Jr.
President, Director]




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO C&D  PRODUCTION  INC. AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY C&D  PRODUCTION  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE  SECURITIES  AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# C_2013147EN.01003502.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/35

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 29 January 2013 — Brus v Commission

(Case F-79/12) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Officials - Application instituting proceedings - Formal requirements - Statement of the grounds on which the application is based - Action manifestly inadmissble)

2013/C 147/67

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Karel Brus (Zaventem, Belgium) (represented by: J. Duvekot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, J. Baquero Cruz and W. Roels, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the Commission’s decisions to dismiss the applicant from his functions and to reduce the amount of his pension following disciplinary proceedings brought finding an infringement of Article 11 of the Staff Regulations.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Brus shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Brus shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 20.10.2012, p. 18.

1

---
No. 96-1315.

#### Millus *v.*Newsday, Inc., et al.

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.
From: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

To: Rich Sewell (rich.sewell@alaska.gov) ; Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante ; "cityofatka@gmail.com" ;

"atkaira@gci.net" ; "nvnikolski@hotmail.com"

Cc: Servant Air, Wes Osowski (FlyKodiak@Yahoo.com) ; Grant Aviation, Bruce McGlasson

(BMcGlasson@FlyGrant.com) ; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)

Subject: Essential Air Service at Atka and Nikolski, Alaska - Request for Comments - Due June 18, 2014

Date: Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:56:15 PM

Attachments: Grant Aviation Proposal to provide EAS Atka - Nikolski Alaska Docket DOT-OST-1995-363 .pdf

Servant Air Atka Nikolski Propsal.pdf

All,

Please find attached to this email the proposals of Grant Aviation, Inc. (Grant) and Servant Air, Inc.

(Servant) to provide Essential Air Service at Atka and Nikolski, Alaska, for a new contract period

beginning October 1, 2014. These were the only proposals received and can also be accessed at

www.regulations.gov by searching for docket DOT-OST-1995-363. I have briefly summarized the

proposals below.

Grant (the incumbent) proposes to continue its existing level of service with three weekly roundtrips

between Atka and Dutch Harbor, and two weekly roundtrips between Nikolski and Dutch Harbor. Grant

will also continue to utilize twin-engine, nine-passenger King Air B-200 aircraft. For this proposal,

Grant requests a combined annual subsidy of $1,352,284.

Servant also proposes to provide three weekly nonstop roundtrips between Atka and Dutch Harbor, and

two weekly roundtrips between Nikolski and Dutch Harbor, utilizing twin-engine, nine-passenger King

Air B-200 aircraft. For this proposal, Servant requires a combined annual subsidy of $1,978,103.

The comments of the communities and the state are a critically important element in our carrierselection decision. We ask that you and any other interested parties carefully review the proposals and

provide us with any comments no later than June 18, 2014. We will docket this email as well as any

comments received. Please feel free to contact myself or the carriers with any questions.

Regards,

A.J.

A.J. Muldoon

Transportation Industry Analyst

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

albert.muldoon@dot.gov

(202) 366-1058
# C_2013108EN.01001301.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/13

---

Action brought on 19 October 2012 — Christophe Gassiat v Ordre des avocats de Paris

(Case C-467/12)

2013/C 108/25

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christophe Gassiat

Applicant:

Defendant: Ordre des avocats de Paris

Defendant:

By order of 21 February 2013, the Court (Seventh Chamber) declared that it clearly has no jurisdiction to rule on the present action. Consequently the action is declared inadmissible. The Court ordered Mr Christophe Gassiat to bear his own costs.

---
```

[111th Congress Public Law 103]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3015]]

Public Law 111-103
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, as the ``John J. Shivnen 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2009 -  [H.R. 2215]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOHN J. SHIVNEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John J. Shivnen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. 
Shivnen Post Office Building''.

    Approved November 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2215:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Sept. 22, 23, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Dear Mayor Barry: 

Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:51 PM 

Cheri Barry (MayorBarry@MeridianMS.org) 

Tom Williams (Tom@MeridianAirport.com); Mickey Bowman (mbowman@gosilver.com); 

Dockets Mail; Devany, Dennis (OSn 

Request for comment re proposal of Silver at Meridian, MS 

Proposal of Silver at Meridianpdf.pdf 

Attached above is a copy of the proposals by Silver Air, Inc., as submitted to us and as found in the docket (DOT-OST2008-0112). We ask that you carefully review this proposal, the only one submitted in response to Order 2012-4-19 

requesting proposals, and submit comments to us no later than June 21. The comments of the community, especially 

elected officials, are a critically important element in our carrier selection decision. We will" d-ocket this email, as well as 

any replies. 

As always, if you have questions, please call either me or my supervisor, Dennis Devany. 

Best Regards, 

Kevin Adams 

Industry Economist 

202-366-1047 

Dennis DeVany 

202-366-1061 

Dear Mayor Barry, 

1
# C_2013344EN.01006802.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/68

---

Order of the General Court of 2 October 2013 — RiskMetrics Solutions v OHIM — (RISKMANAGER)

(Case T-557/12) (1)

1

2013/C 344/125

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 370, 17.12.2011.

1

---
May 1, 1951

No. 55518.

Suit 4647. —

#### Weyenberg Shoe Mfg. Co. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1231 reversed February 27, 1951. C. A. D. 448.
# C_2015205EN.01000301.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Krakowie — Poland) — Drukarnia Multipress sp. z o.o. v Minister Finansów

(Case C-357/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Directive 2008/7/EC - Article 2(1)(b) and (c) - Indirect taxes on the raising of capital - Subjection to capital duty - Contributions of capital to a partnership limited by shares - Classification of such a partnership as a capital company))

(2015/C 205/03)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Krakowie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Drukarnia Multipress sp. z o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Minister Finansów

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1)(b) and (c) of Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital must be interpreted as meaning that a partnership limited by shares under Polish law must be regarded as a capital company within the meaning of that provision even if only some of its capital and members are able to satisfy the conditions laid down by that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013.

1

---