alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. E7-9264) published on page 27311 of the issue for Tuesday, May 15, 2007. 

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis heading, the entry for Atwood Holdings Limited Partnership, Trezevant, Tennessee, is revised to read as follows: 

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                 

*1. Atwood Holdings Limited Partnership*, individually and as part of the Atwood Control Group which consists of George L. Atwood, as general partner, and Suzanne Atwood; to gain control of F & M Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly gain control of Citizens City and County Bank, Trenton, and Farmer's and Merchants Bank, Trezevant, all of Tennessee.                 

Comments on this application must be received by May 30, 2007. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 17, 2007. 

Jennifer J. Johnson, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. E7-9797 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Caneum, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 15, 2005

/s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan
Sukhbir Singh Mudan, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
No. 74-5790.

#### Johnson *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement No. 333-153229 and 333-116837 on Form S-8 and 333-126312, 333-126573, 333-127464, 333-157694 and 333-157702 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 25, 2010, relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in accounting for noncontrolling interests andconvertible debt instruments for which the consolidated financial statements were retrospectively adjusted) and the effectiveness of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHELLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 25, 2010
# C_2014315EN.01000902.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbetsdomstolen — Sweden) — Fonnship A/S, Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet v Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet, Fonnship A/S, Facket för Service och Kommunikation (SEKO)

(Case C-83/13) (1)

1

((Maritime transport - Freedom to provide services - Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 - Applicability to transport carried out from or to States that are parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) using vessels flying the flag of a third country - Industrial action taken in the ports of such a State in favour of third country nationals employed on those vessels - Nationality of those workers and vessels having no bearing on the applicability of EU law))

2014/C 315/13

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Arbetsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Fonnship A/S, Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet

Applicants:

Defendants: Svenska Transportarbetareförbundet, Fonnship A/S, Facket för Service och ommunikation (SEKO)

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 of 22 December 1986 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries must be interpreted as meaning that a company established in a State that is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 and which is proprietor of a vessel flying the flag of a third country, by which maritime transport services are provided from or to a State that is a party to the EEA Agreement, may rely on the freedom to provide services, provided that it can, due to its operation of that vessel, be classed as a provider of those services and that the persons for whom the services are intended are established in States that are parties to the EEA Agreement other than that in which that company is established.

---

(1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.

1

---
Addendum #3

Credit terms and commission.

King Media, Inc. agrees to extend additional credit to Cooperative Images for
short-form direct response on the following terms.

For the period beginning with the June 1998 Broadcast month and ending with
the September 1998 Broadcast month, Payments for monthly media expenditures
shall be made in four (4) equal weekly installments, beginning the twenty
first(21st) week following the end of the broadcast month.

Commission rate payable to KMI for media on which this additional credit is
extended shall be at a full standard 15% commission.

All late payments will be charged interest at a rate of 1.5% per month.

King Media, Inc, at its sole discretion may cancel or modify these credit
terms as any tim notice. Should King Media, Inc. cancel or modify credit
terms, all amounts due in accord new terms will be paid to KMI by Cooperative
in full within 10 business days of written changes.

In whitness whereof, the Parties hereto have set their hands and seals,

Client                                          King Media, Inc.
By:/s/Gerard A. Powell,CEO date 8-3-98        By:/s/Allen Stern,President date
8/3/98
From: "Bob Davis (AMI)" <Bob.Davis@Airgas.com>

To: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 04/11/2008 09:42 AM

Subject: RE: Comments received on the PGVP and Cost of 17025

Hello John:

After a discussion with Doug King (our QA / QC manager) concerning ISO 17025 

the cost per facility for Airgas would be $60,000 for initial accreditation 

and it would cost another $10,000 to $20,000 per year for annual costs 

associated with ISO blends. Since Airgas has more plants that produce EPA 

protocols than any other vendor it would cost us well over $1,000,000 in 

combined labor and consulting fees within the next few years. The Protocol 

Gas Verification Program would be much more cost effective and would give an 

actual representation of the quality of EPA protocol gas cylinders. As you 

know one of our Airgas companies (Royal Oak Michigan) was ISO 17025 yet in 

the 2003 audit they still failed. The designation of ISO 17025 makes sure 

the proceedures are in place (by guidance) but it does not insure that they 

are followed (the results).

Please do not hesitate to call me if you need further clarification.

Thank you

Bob Davis

610-675-6854

-----Original Message-----

From: Schakenbach.John@epamail.epa.gov 

[mailto:Schakenbach.John@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 1:56 PM

To: Bob Davis (AMI)

Subject: Fw: Comments received on the PGVP and Cost of 17025

Bob,

I appreciate your offer to help. I sent these comments to Steve Mandel

yesterday; you are welcome to respond to them as well. Also, since

Airgas is ISO 17025 accredited, I'm wondering if you could give me an

estimate for the initial and annual costs for being ISO 17025 accredited

for producing EPA Protocol gases, for single component, bi-blends and

tri-blends for common concentration ranges used by utility power plants.

Thanks

John Schakenbach

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Clean Air Markets Division

schakenbach.john@epa.gov

Phone: 202-343-9158

Fax: 202-343-2359
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Transcript of the public hearing held on 2/19/13 in East St. Louis, Illinois.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DAMON WHEELER, SR.,

Appellant

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 31 WAP 2022

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court entered June
1, 2022 at No. 196 MD 2021.

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23 rd day of November , 2022, the Order of the Commonwealth

Court is affirmed in part and vacat ed and remanded in part . We affirm the Order to the

extent it affirms the trial court as to the 340 days of credit for time served and the

imposition of financial penalties. We otherwise vacate the Order and remand solely for a

determination of the merits of Damon Wheeler, Sr.’s req uest for credit for time served

from his arrest in Philadelphia County on May 11, 2019, until his transfer to Cambria

County on July 19, 2019. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9760(1) (providing that a defendant is entitled

to credit for time served “for all time spent i n custody as a result of the criminal charge”)

.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Edward A. Keible, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
of Endwave Corporation (the "Company"), and Julianne M. Biagini, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their
knowledge:

      1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
"QUARTERLY REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the
13th day of August, 2003.



/s/EDWARD A. KEIBLE, JR.                        /s/JULIANNE M. BIAGINI
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Edward A. Keible, Jr.                           Julianne M. Biagini
Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Financial Officer
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2891721-SEP-201209:54 AM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BEHROOZ MOHAZZABI, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 22-15360 

D.C. No. 4:21-cv-06751-JST 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2023**

Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Behrooz Mohazzabi appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing 

his action alleging fraud in connection with an arbitration proceeding. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

The district did not abuse its discretion in construing Mohazzabi’s complaint 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 11 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-15360 

as a motion under Rules 60(b)(2) and (3) to vacate the 2019 order compelling 

arbitration in a different case and denying it because it was untimely and because 

allegations of fraud during the arbitration proceeding did not provide a justification 

for vacating the order compelling arbitration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1) 

(requiring a motion under Rules 60(b)(2) or (3) to be made no more than a year 

after the entry of the judgment); Washington v. Ryan, 833 F.3d 1087, 1091 (9th 

Cir. 2016) (en banc) (setting forth standard of review).

Even if Mohazzabi’s complaint were construed as an independent action 

seeking to vacate the arbitration award, dismissal was proper because the action

was untimely and Mohazzabi failed to allege facts sufficient to show fraud that 

would justify vacating the award. See 9 U.S.C. § 12 (explaining that notice of a 

motion to vacate an arbitration award must be “served upon the adverse party or 

his attorney within three months after the award is filed or delivered”); Dogherra 

v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 679 F.2d 1293, 1297 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining that 

“courts must be slow to vacate an arbitral award on the ground of fraud,” and the 

alleged fraud must not have been discoverable upon the exercise of due diligence 

and must be materially related to an issue in the arbitration). 

The district court properly dismissed Mohazzabi’s action without leave to 

amend because amendment would be futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home 

Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review 
3 22-15360 

and explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper when amendment 

would be futile).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
No. 39135.

#### Protest 929727-G of M. B. Daniels *&*Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was established that certain items consist of majolica-ware in sets of three pieces. The protest was sustained accordingly.
No. 47070.

#### Protests 957908-G, etc., of Young’s Market Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial counsel for the respective parties agreed that the whisky and the containers therefor were entered under a special permit whereby no indicia was required to be blown into such containers; that the containers were of equal value to the whisky contained therein; and that such containers are properly classifiable at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 218 (f), Tariff Act of 1930, and at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 810. In view ol this agreement the court held the merchandise in question to be properly dutiable at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 218 (f) and at 20 percent under paragraph 810. The protests were sustained to the extent indicated.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION


I, Craig Burton, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of USIP.Com, Inc.;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:


a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 21, 2006


                                     /s/ Craig Burton
                                     Craig Burton, President/Chief Acct. Officer
# C_2012200EN.01001801.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/18

---

Action brought on 26 April 2012 — Moonich Produktkonzepte & Realisierung v OHIM — Thermofilm Australia (HEATSTRIP)

(Case T-184/12)

2012/C 200/37

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Moonich Produktkonzepte & Realisierung GmbH (Sauerlach/Lochhofen, Germany) (represented by: H. Pannen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thermofilm Australia Pty Ltd (Springvale, Australia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 January 2012 in Case R 1956/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 January 2012 in Case R 1956/2010-1;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘HEATSTRIP’ for goods in Classes 9, 11 and 35 — application No 7 296 676

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Thermofilm Australia Pty Ltd

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the unregistered word mark ‘HEATSTRIP’, which is protected in Australia, Canada, the United States of America and the United Kingdom for inter alia heaters

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was upheld and the application was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 75 and the second part of Article 76(1) of that regulation

Pleas in law:

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 D0 01 4 . GERALD K. J OHNSON, J R. v . DI ANE J OHNSON.

Geral d K. J o hn s o n an d Di an e J o h ns o n were d i v o rced o n Au g u s t 1 4

, 2 0 1 3.

Di an e J o h n s o n fi l ed a m o t i on fo r co n t em p t ag ai n s t Geral d J o h n s on

, al leg i n g t h at h e

v i o l at ed a pro v i s i o n o f t h e d iv o rce d ecree th at req u i res h i m t o h av e v i s i t at i o n wi th

t h ei r 2 3-y ea r

- o l d s on

, wh o h as Do wn Sy n d ro m e. Th e t ri al co u rt g ran t ed Di an e

J o h n so n ’s m o t i o n fo r co n t em p t

, an d i n a s u b s eq uen t o rd er, g ran t ed at t o rn ey fees to

Di an e J o hn s on . Th i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret io n ary ap p eal fo l l o w ed

.

P u r s u a n t t o O C G A § 5

- 6

- 3 4 ( a ) ( 1 1 )

, “ [ a ]l l j u d g m e n t s o r o r d e r s i n c h i l d

cu s t o d y cas es awar d i n g

, refu s i n g t o ch an g e, or m o d i fy i n g ch i l d cu s t o d y o r h o l d i n g

o r d ecl i n i n g t o h o l d p ers o n s i n co n t em p t o f s uch ch i l d cu s t o d y ju d g m en t o r o rd ers ”

are d i r e c t l y ap p eal ab l e. Ad d i t i o n al l y

, “ [u ] nd er G eo rg i a l aw, v i s i t at i o n ri gh t s are a

p a r t o f cu s t o d y .” V

i n es v. Vi n es

, 2 9 2 Ga. 55 0

, 55 1 (2 ) (7 3 9 SE2 d 3 7 4 ) (2 0 1 3 ).

Becau s e Geral d J o h n s o n was h el d i n co n t em p t o f a cu st o d y p ro v i s i o n of th e d i v o rce

d ecree, h e i s en t i t l ed t o a d i rect ap p eal

.

W e wi l l g ran t a t i m el y -fi l ed d i s cret i o n ary ap p l i cat i on i f t h e l ower co u rt ’ s o rd er

i s s u b ject t o di rect ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (j). Acco rd i n g l y

, t h is ap p l i cat i o n i s

h ereb y GRANTED. Geral d J o h n s on s h al l h av e t en d ay s fro m t h e d at e o f t h i s o rd er

t o fi l e a n o t i ce o f ap peal wi t h t h e t ri al co u rt

. If, h o wev er, h e h as al read y fi l ed a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal

, h e n eed n o t fi l e a s eco n d n o t i ce. Th e cl erk o f t h e t ri al co u rt i s DIRECTED

t o i ncl ud e a co p y

o f t h is o rd er i n t he reco rd t ran s m i t t ed t o t h e Co u rt o f Ap peal s

. August 25, 2016C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 08/25/2016