alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NoMatterWare, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Burns, President, CEO and acting CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William BurnsName:	William BurnsTitle:	President /CEO and acting CFODated: 	August 23, 2002
WWW.EXFILE.COM, INC. -- 888-775-4789 -- CHATTEM, INC. -- EXHIBIT 10.54 TO FORM 10-K


    EXHIBIT
      10.54

     

    Incentive
      Compensation
      Plan

     

    The
      Company’s annual incentive compensation plan is intended to assist the Company
      in rewarding and motivating key employees, focuses strongly on Company and
      individual performance, and provides a fully competitive compensation package
      to
      plan participants.  As a pay-for-performance plan, cash incentive
      awards are paid annually based on the achievement of performance objectives
      for
      the year.  Under the plan, each plan participant is provided a range
      of potential annual incentive awards based on competitive award levels in the
      marketplace.  Actual awards paid under the plan are based on the
      Company’s corporate performance.  Individual performance is also
      considered in determining actual award levels, but is assessed in a
      non-formulaic fashion.  The incentive compensation plan performance
      objective is earnings per share performance against plan.  The maximum
      incentive awards that could be awarded to the Company’s named executive officers
      pursuant to the incentive compensation plan are as follows: chairman and chief
      executive officer – (150% x annual base salary); president and chief operating
      officer - (100% x annual base salary); vice presidents - (60% x annual base
      salary).
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim
W. Mogg, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


        /s/ Jim W. Mogg
-------------------------------------
Jim W. Mogg
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  IBS
INTERACTIVE,  INC.'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                            <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                               5,477  
<SECURITIES>                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                        1,515 
<ALLOWANCES>                            23 
<INVENTORY>                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     7,224 
<PP&E>                               1,823 
<DEPRECIATION>                         880 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       9,875 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  926 
<BONDS>                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0 
<PREFERRED>                              0 
<COMMON>                                36 
<OTHER-SE>                           7,983 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         9,875 
<SALES>                              9,805 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     9,805 
<CGS>                                6,430 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       10,011  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        60 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      84 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (45)
<INCOME-TAX>                           (15)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (60) 
<DISCONTINUED>                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0  
<CHANGES>                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                           (60) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (0.02)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.02)  
                               





</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 29, 2022

No. 04-21-00466-CV

PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., and Karla Waples,

Appellants

v.

BANDERA WRANGLERS,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVOC-20-0000171

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 20, 2022, appellants filed a “Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental 

Authority,” attached to which is appellant’s Notice of Supplemental Authority. On June 28, 

2022, appellee filed an “Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Response to Appellants’ Notice of 

Supplemental Authority,” attached to which is appellee’s response. The motions are 

GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on July 29, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
Before the Third Division,

December 14, 1945

No. 50770.

#### Protests 5010-K, etc., of W. T. Grant Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bonbon dishes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Butler Bros.*(33 C. C. P. A. 22, C. A. D. 310). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held properly dutiable at 70 percent under paragraph 212 without the additional assessment of 10 cents per dozen pieces.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. MAT E O G OME Z S I L VE S T R E - DI E GO , a. k. a. E l T i gre, a. k. a. M at eo G om ez S i l vestre , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 50415 D. C . No . 2 : 1 0 - c r - 0 1 0 5 7 - OD W ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O t i s D . W r i ghtI I , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a t e o G om e z S i l ve s tr e - D i e go appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt and chal l enges the 96 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl ea conv i ct i on for c on spi ra cyt o h arbo r and transpo rti l l egalal i ens, i n v i ol at i on of 8 

# FI LED OC T 03 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50415 2 U . S . C . § 1324( a ) ( 1) ( A ) ( v) ( I ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f i rm. S ilv e s tr e - D ie g o c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o c e du r a llye rr e dw h e n it b a s e dh is s e n te n c e o n a n u n s ub s tan tia te da s s u m p tio n r e g a r d in g th e f r e q u e n c yw ith w hi ch he engaged in spousal abuse. W e r evi ew for pl ai n err or, se e U ni ted States v. V ale nc i a- B arragan , 608 F . 3d 1103, 1108 ( 9th C i r . 2010) , a nd f i nd none . A ny f a c tu a l e rr o rb yth e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t a f f e c t th e s e n te n c e im p o s e d . See U ni ted States v . D al lm an , 53 3 F . 3d 75 5, 76 2 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). AF F I RME D.
Exhibit
10.16




Waste
Connections, Inc.





Amended
and Restated


Compensation
Plan for Independent Directors








This Compensation Plan, as amended and
restated herein, shall be effective December 7, 2007, until changed by the Board
of Directors. This Plan shall apply to independent directors only. Directors who
are employed by Waste Connections, Inc. are not entitled to receive separate
compensation for participation in Board or Committee Meetings.





Independent directors shall be
compensated by payment of a basic monthly retainer of $1,625 per month.
Committee Chairs shall be entitled to additional compensation, to be added to
their monthly retainers, as follows:




Audit Committee Chair...................................................
              $500 per
    monthCompensation Committee Chair.......................................
              125 per
      monthNominating and Corporate GovernanceCommittee Chair...............................................................
              125 per
      month




The basic
monthly payment is intended to compensate independent directors for
participation in meetings held by conference call and for incidental
participation in company affairs between meetings. Accordingly, no payment shall
be made with respect to Board and Committee meetings conducted by conference
telephone call nor for such incidental participation.





Independent
directors shall be entitled to a payment of $4,500 for each Board of Directors
and Committee meeting attended in person, plus payment or reimbursement of out
of pocket travel expenses.  When a Committee meeting is held in
conjunction with a Board Meeting, no separate payment shall be
made.





All
payments under this Compensation Plan shall be made as soon as administratively
practicable after the services with respect to such payment have been performed
and, in any event, prior to March 15 of the calendar year following the year in
which the services with respect to such payment were performed.





Independent
directors shall be granted options to purchase between 15,000 and 30,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock at fair market value on the date of grant. The
grant shall be made in conjunction with the Company’s annual grant to officers
and employees, typically in February of each year, provided that the grant date
may be changed from time to time in the discretion of the Compensation
Committee. The Compensation Committee shall determine the actual number of
options granted to independent directors within this
range.  Independent directors are eligible to participate in the
Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, which provides for the issuance of
restricted stock and restricted stock units. The number of options granted may
be less than
15,000 in future years if restricted stock or restricted stock units are issued
to independent directors in conjunction with option grants.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00134-CR

L.T. ETCHISON, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. F48379

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

L.T. Etchison, Jr., attempts to appeal his convictions of two counts of delivery of a 

controlled substance and two counts of possession of a controlled substance. This Court is without 

jurisdiction to consider Etchison’s appeal because Etchison had no right of appeal due to his plea 

bargain with the State.

The trial court’s certification of right of appeal filed in this matter shows that this was a 

plea bargain case in which Etchison had no right of appeal. The Texas Legislature has granted a 

very limited right of appeal in plea bargain cases. Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure details that right as follows:

(2) . . . . In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s 

plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a 

defendant may appeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on 

before trial, or

(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.

TEX.. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The appellate record filed in this matter contains no written motions 

filed by Etchison and ruled on before trial. Further, there is no indication in the record that 

Etchison obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. To the contrary, the trial court’s 

certification indicates that Etchison has no right of appeal. Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial 

court’s certification indicates no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
3

On August 10, 2015, we informed Etchison of the apparent defect in our jurisdiction over 

his appeal and afforded him the opportunity to respond and, if possible, to cure such defect. 

Etchison did not respond to our letter.

Because Etchison’s plea agreement prevents an appeal and because the trial court’s 

certification correctly indicates that Etchison is without a right of appeal, we dismiss this appeal 

for want of jurisdiction.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: September 14, 2015

Date Decided: September 15, 2015

Do Not Publish
February 13, 1940

No. 43229.

#### Protests 961695-G, etc., of Quong Lee & Co. et al.

C. D. 277. Application by plaintiffs for rehearing granted.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Chimerix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy W. Trost, Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|By:                | /s/ Timothy W. Trost |                                                                       
|------------------ | -------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   | Name:                | Timothy W. Trost                                                      
|                   | Title:               | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
|                   |                     
|Date: May 13, 2013 |                     





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Energy Field Services, LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W. H.
Easter III, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

        /s/ W. H. Easter III
------------------------------------
W. H. Easter III
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Nortel Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 11, 2003
    
    /s/ FRANK A. DUNN
Frank A. Dunn
President and Chief Executive OfficerDated: August 11, 2003
    
    /s/ DOUGLAS C. BEATTY
Douglas C. Beatty
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a - 14(a) or
15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act

I, A.W. Bergeron, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AES Red Oak, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [Reserved]

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information and;

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  August 14, 2003

                                        /s/ A.W. Bergeron
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        A.W. Bergeron
                                        President
No. 65791.

#### Esso Standard Oil Company *v.*United States,

protest 58/3113 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that duty was assessed on 4,750,117 gallons and that only 4,585,669 gallons of fuel oil were landed, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunnyside Acres Mobile Estates
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Brian Pierson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2007



                                        By: /s/ BRIAN PIERSON
                                            ___________________________
                                                Brian Pierson
                                                President