alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Fit to fight, fitted for flight

By Senior Airman Gwendalyn Smith502nd Air Base Wing Public Affairs

                JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas --   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Joint Base San Antonio website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

aircrew flight equipment435th Fighter Training SquadronJoint Base San Antonio-Randolphhelmetsmasksparachutessurvival kitsharnesses
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1889 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1889

    To protect children from neglect and abuse on Federal property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2011

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To protect children from neglect and abuse on Federal property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Children's Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. CHILD ABUSE REPORTING.

    Section 226 of the Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 
13031) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``A person'' and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) Covered professional.--Any person''; and
                    (B) by inserting at the end the following:
            ``(2) Other persons.--In addition to those persons in 
        paragraph (1), any person who, while on Federal land or in a 
        federally operated (or contracted) facility, learns of facts 
        that give reason to suspect that a child has suffered an 
        incident of child abuse, shall as soon as possible make a 
        report of the suspected abuse to the agency designated under 
        subsection (d).'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``subsection (a)'' and 
        inserting ``subsection (a)(1)''; and
            (3) in subsection (e), by striking ``mandated reporter 
        groups'' and inserting ``covered professionals described in 
        subsection (b)''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015046EN.01001101.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 December 2014 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage — Netherlands) — FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media v Staat der Nederlanden

(Case C-413/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Competition - Article 101 TFEU - Substantive scope - Collective labour agreement - Provision laying down minimum rates for independent service providers - Definition of ‘undertaking’ - Definition of ‘employee’))

(2015/C 046/14)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof te 's-Gravenhage

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: FNV Kunsten Informatie en Media

Applicant:

Defendant: Staat der Nederlanden

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

On a proper construction of EU law, it is only when self-employed service providers who are members of one of the contracting employees’ organisations and perform for an employer, under a works or service contract, the same activity as that employer’s employed workers, are ‘false self-employed’, in other words, service providers in a situation comparable to that of those workers, that a provision of a collective labour agreement, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which sets minimum fees for those self-employed service providers, does not fall within the scope of Article 101(1) TFEU. It is for the national court to ascertain whether that is so.

---

(1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

 WALEED SAID BN SAID ZAID,

Petitioner,

v.

Civil Action No. 05-1646 (JDB)

 

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al.,

 Respondents.

ORDER

Pursuant to the status conference held on May 7, 2009, and the entire record herein, it is

hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Counsel for respondents shall confer with representatives of the Department of

Defense to determine the status of the production of medical records requested by petitioner and

shall file a status report by not later than May 15, 2009 that specifies precisely when those

medical records will be produced to petitioner.

2. The Court notes that counsel for respondents represented at the status conference

that respondents do not intend to further amend the factual return in this case.

3. The briefing schedule for motions for judgment on the record pursuant to § III.A.1

of the Case Management Order in this case is modified as follows: respondents' motion for

judgment on the record shall be filed by not later than May 29, 2009; petitioner's opposition shall
 Counsel for petitioner represented that petitioner does not intend to file a cross-motion 1

for judgment on the record.

-2-

be filed by not later than June 15, 2009; and respondents' reply shall be filed by not later than 1

June 22, 2009.

4. An evidentiary hearing shall be held in this case, if necessary, on August 25, 2009,

at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 15.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Date: May 7, 2009
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Distribution’s Saxton receives commander’s coin

By Brianne M. BenderDLA Distribution Command Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
DLA Distribution Associate Counsel, Karen Saxton received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution commanding officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 1. 

Saxton effectively delivers timely, quality, professional legal advice and services to DLA Distribution senior leaders and clients and manages the most demanding litigation case load in the agency.  Additionally, she volunteered to serve as legal advisor on the DLA team responsible for preparing to negotiate the new Master Labor Agreement.  

Furthermore, Saxton is currently preparing a briefing on the "Use of Force and Carrying Firearms" for DLA Police to ensure they satisfy the critical training requirement and are prepared to execute their installation security responsibilities.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLAawardDLA DistributionDistribution
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

DAT/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CARL D. EDWARDS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10314

D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00154-KJD

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Carl D. Edwards appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and 

we affirm.

FILED

MAR 08 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
DAT/Research 2 09-10314

Edwards contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his

motion for substitution of counsel because it failed to conduct an adequate inquiry

into the nature, extent, and reasons for Edwards’ conflict with appointed counsel. 

The record reflects that the district court performed an adequate inquiry and

concluded that the conflict centered upon a difference of opinion as to legal

strategy. See United States v. Smith, 282 F.3d 758, 763 (9th Cir. 2002); see also

United States v. Mendez-Sanchez, 563 F.3d 935, 943-44 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2014184EN.01002901.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/29

---

Order of the General Court of 2 April 2014 — Wedi v OHIM — Mehlhose Bauelemente für Dachrand + Fassade (BALCO)

(Case T-541/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 184/50

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wedi GmbH (Emsdetten, Germany) (represented by: O. Bischof, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially A. Pohlmann, then A. Schifko, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Mehlhose Bauelemente für Dachrand + Fassade GmbH & Co. KG (Herford, Germany) (represented by: M. Wirtz, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 September 2012 (Case R 2255/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Mehlhose Bauelemente für Dachrand + Fassade GmbH & Co. KG and Wedi GmbH.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the defendant shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the defendant shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 16.2.2013.

1

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kevin L. FALLS.

No. 99-K-0063.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 4, 1999.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 3, 1999.

PER CURIAM. *

Granted. The appellate court’s judgment is vacated. A new claim generally cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. La.C.Cr.P. art. 841; *State v. Cressy,*440 So.2d 141, 142-43 (La.1983); *State v.*Stoltz, 358 So.2d 1249, 1250 (La.1978).

The “cooperation” portion of the plea bargain included the illegal sentencing term but failed when the defendant unilaterally breached that part of the agreement by fleeing to Texas. The defendant’s voluntary act thereby triggered the alternative portion of the plea bargain, which called for an entirely lawful sentence, accepted by the defendant as an alternative to cooperation with the authorities when he entered his guilty plea. *See State v. Louis,*94-0761 (La.11/30/94) 645 So.2d 1144; *State v. Lewis,*539 So.2d 1199 (La.1989). The case is remanded for enforcement of that part of the agreement, if appropriate, after consideration of the defendant’s remaining claims pretermitted on original appeal, including claims under *State v. Sheppard,*95-0370 (La.9/13/96), 679 So.2d 899.

CALOGERO, C.J., and LEMMON and KIMBALL, JJ., would grant and docket.

*

 Knoll, J., not on panel. *See*La. S.Ct. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


EX-23.1     Consent of KPMG LLP


<PAGE>


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration StatementS (NoS.
333-47684 and 333-65463) on Form S-8 of Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp. and
subsidiaries of our report dated March 15, 2001, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries as of
January 29, 2000 and February 3, 2001, and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended February 3, 2001, and the related schedule, which report
appears in the February 3, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of Electronics
Boutique Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, PA
April 26, 2001
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WealthCraft Systems Inc.
("WealthCraft") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kelly Jay Michael
Tallas, Chief Executive Officer of WealthCraft, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Kelly Jay Michael Tallas
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer

                                        Date:    August 14, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28663-28664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9751]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 232


Contract Financing

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Request for public input.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is conducting a review of the Department's contract 
financing policies. As part of this review, DoD would like to hear the 
views of interested parties regarding the effectiveness of the 
financing policies presently used for DoD contracts.

DATES: Submit written comments to the address shown below on or before 
July 23, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to: Office of the Director, Defense 
Procurement and Acquisition Policy, ATTN: OUSD

[[Page 28664]]

(AT&L) DPAP (CPF), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 
20301-3062. Comments also may be submitted by facsimile at (703) 602-
7887, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a705552541477596a525f484955547a55495e14575356"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="efa5808781c1a28cbf878a9d9c8081af809c8bc1828683">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John McPherson, by telephone at 
(703) 602-0296, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86cce9eee8a8cbe5d6eee3f4f5e9e8c6e9f5e2a8ebefea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a406562642447695a626f787965644a65796e24676366">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD policies on contract financing are 
described in Part 32 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and 
Part 232 of the Defense FAR Supplement. These policies cover a variety 
of contract finance issues, including non-commercial item purchase 
financing; commercial item purchase financing; loan guarantees for 
defense production; advance payments for noncommercial items; progress 
payments based on costs; contract debts; contract funding; assignment 
of claims; prompt payment; performance-based payments; electronic funds 
transfer; electronic submission and processing of payment requests; and 
levies on contract payments.
    DoD is interested in receiving public input on these contract 
financing policies, particularly with regard to those that are 
considered to be especially effective or ineffective, along with 
supporting rationale.

Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. E7-9751 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 45294.

#### Protests 951230-G, etc., of Polk Musical Supply Co. et al. (Savannah, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2013101EN.01001702.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2013 — Piotrowski v OHIM (MEDIGYM)

(Case T-33/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark MEDIGYM - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Right to a hearing - Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

2013/C 101/37

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Elke Piotrowski (Viernheim, Germany) (represented by: J. Albrecht, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Lenz and G. Schneider, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2011 (Case R 734/2011-4) concerning an international registration designating the European Community of the word sign MEDIGYM.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Elke Piotrowski to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Elke Piotrowski to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 17.3.2012.

1

---