alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Visit to site of key World War I victory prompts reflection, appreciation

By Jim White, DLA Europe and Africa

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

AEFArmyWWIMihielFranceWorld War IdoughboyAmerican Expeditionary ForcesPeople and CultureEurope and AfricaGermany1918ArgonneAllies
#### L. P. Seibold, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6884.

Entry No. W-53, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, August 1944, etc.

Certified August 1944, etc.

Entered at Washington, D. C., September 19, 1944, etc.

(Decided February 17, 1947)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The cited case has been incorporated herein by consent of the parties who further agree on a set of facts, embodied in a written stipulation submitting the present cases, showing export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values are the appraised values of the articles in question, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION


I, Kathy Christopher, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of USIP.Com, Inc.;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:


a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 1, 2005



                                            /s/ Kathy Christopher
                                            Kathy Christopher, Controller, USIP.
                                            Com Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0638

WJG, LLC, a Montana Limited

Liability Company,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

BOBBI HURLEY & JOHN AND

JANE DOES, 1-10,

 Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT John C. Schulte, whose name appears next on the list of 

attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this January 10, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Bobbi Hurley, Thomas Charles Orr, John C. Schulte

01/10/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0638
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATE
OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Network 1 Financial Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
W. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer, Vice-President and Chairman (principal
executive officer) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the
Report.




Date:
      October 13, 2009
                  /s/ Richard W. HuntRichard
      W. HuntChief
      Executive
Officer
No. 46427.

#### Protests 714427-G, etc., of Amtorg Trading Corp. (New York).

*291Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the dogskins in question are similar to those the subject of *Brachman*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389). In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as to those items.
# C_2012287EN.01003801.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/38

---

Action brought on 30 July 2012 — El Hogar Perfecto del Siglo XXI v OHIM — Wenf International Advisers (Corkscrews)

(Case T-337/12)

2012/C 287/68

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Hogar Perfecto del Siglo XXI, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: C. Ruiz Gallegos and E. Veiga Conde, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wenf International Advisers Ltd (Tortola, Virgin Islands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 June 2012 in Appeal R 89/2011-3; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 June 2012 in Appeal R 89/2011-3;

| — | order OHIM and the intervener to pay the costs |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the intervener to pay the costs

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Design for corkscrews — Community design 00083 0831-0001

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community design: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community design:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: Wenf International Advisers Ltd

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: National design for bottle openers

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application upheld

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Infringement of Articles 4 and 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 4 and 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002

| — | Infringement of Articles 4 and 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 4 and 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002

---
No. 39178.

#### Protests 930896-G, etc., of Kraft Associated Distbrs. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 38185 the protests were sustained.
# C_2013252EN.01004503.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/45

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — Di Prospero v Commission

(Case F-12/12) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Appointment - Success in a competition following a request to the applicant to sit the competition with a view to complying with a judgment - Appointment in the grade with retroactive effect)

2013/C 252/78

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rita Di Prospero (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil Service — Action for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s request for classification at grade AD 11 with retroactive effect as at 1 January 2010 and for compensation for damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | The decision of the European Commission of 18 October 2011 refusing to grade Ms Di Prospero in grade AD 11 with retroactive effect from 1 January 2010 is annulled; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decision of the European Commission of 18 October 2011 refusing to grade Ms Di Prospero in grade AD 11 with retroactive effect from 1 January 2010 is annulled;

| 2. | The remainder of the action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The remainder of the action is dismissed;

| 3. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by Ms Di Prospero. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by Ms Di Prospero.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 32.

1

---
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 19, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Xiaowei (Simon) Song                                            |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Xiaowei (Simon) SongChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                  |   |                                                                     |   |
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of tw telecom inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark A. Peters, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                   
|----------------------- |  | ------------------
|                        |  | /s/ Mark A. Peters
|Name: Mark A. Peters   
|                       
|Date: February 12, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Of

Chief Executive Officer And

Chief Financial Officer

Of NATCO
Group Inc.

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John U. Clarke, Chief Executive Officer of NATCO Group Inc. (the
Company), and, I, Richard W. FitzGerald, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ John U. Clarke     
|                     |  |  |  | John U. Clarke         
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |  |  |                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard W. FitzGerald
|                     |  |  |  | Richard W. FitzGerald    
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Universal Compression, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Stephen A.
Snider, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|/s/STEPHEN A. SNIDERStephen A. Snider
Chief Executive Officer
June 9, 2005 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

In
connection with the Annual Report of Universal Compression, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, J. Michael
Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|/s/J. MICHAEL ANDERSONJ. Michael Anderson
Chief Financial Officer
June 9, 2005 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---
# C_2012366EN.01003602.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/36

---

Action brought on 21 September 2012 — Beninca v Commission

(Case T-418/12)

2012/C 366/74

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jürgen Beninca (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: C. Zschocke, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul Commission’s decision of 26 July 2012, implicitly refusing access to a document produced in the framework of merger proceedings (Case COMP/M.6166 — NYSE Euronext/Deutsche Börse); and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Commission’s decision of 26 July 2012, implicitly refusing access to a document produced in the framework of merger proceedings (Case COMP/M.6166 — NYSE Euronext/Deutsche Börse); and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the Commission has not rendered a decision on the applicant’s request to access to a certain document within the time limit foreseen by Article 8(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 (1). Pursuant to Article 8(3) of the Regulation, this constitutes an implicit negative and unreasoned decision and thereby constitutes a violation of relevant provisions on access to documents. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the Commission has not rendered a decision on the applicant’s request to access to a certain document within the time limit foreseen by Article 8(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 (1). Pursuant to Article 8(3) of the Regulation, this constitutes an implicit negative and unreasoned decision and thereby constitutes a violation of relevant provisions on access to documents.

1

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that none of the arguments raised by the Commission, in its preliminary assessment, justify denying the applicant access to the requested document. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that none of the arguments raised by the Commission, in its preliminary assessment, justify denying the applicant access to the requested document.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, p. 43)

1

---
Before the Third Division,

April 7, 1943

No. 48179.

#### Protest 95955-K of George Lueders & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the drum in question was not found at the time of unlading but as the discharging inspector was not satisfied that it was not landed the collector assessed duty thereon. However, it was found upon investigation that the manifest was wrong and that the drum was never landed. In accordance therewith the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry and make refund of duty upon the drum in question in accordance with stipulation of counsel entered into at the trial.