alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015096EN.01001301.xml

| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015 — Ryanair v Commission

(Case T-500/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Irish tax on air passengers - Lower rate for destinations no more than 300 km from Dublin - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Selective nature - Identification of the beneficiaries of the aid - Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Obligation to state reasons))

(2015/C 096/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: B. Kennelly, Barrister, E. Vahida and I.-G. Metaxas-Maragkidis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Aer Lingus Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: K. Bacon, D. Scannell, D. Bailey, Barristers, and A. Burnside, Solicitor)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Ireland (represented by: E. Creedon, A. Joyce and J. Quaney, acting as Agents, assisted by E. Regan, SC, and B. Doherty, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2013/199/EU of 25 July 2012 on State aid Case SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) — Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland (OJ 2013 L 119, p. 30).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 4 of Commission Decision 2013/199/EU of 25 July 2012 on State aid Case SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) — Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland, in so far as it orders the recovery of the aid from the beneficiaries for an amount which is set at EUR 8 per passenger in recital 70 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 4 of Commission Decision 2013/199/EU of 25 July 2012 on State aid Case SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) — Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland, in so far as it orders the recovery of the aid from the beneficiaries for an amount which is set at EUR 8 per passenger in recital 70 of that decision;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs, as well as half of the costs incurred by Ryanair Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs, as well as half of the costs incurred by Ryanair Ltd;

| 4. | Orders Ryanair to pay half of its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Ryanair to pay half of its own costs;

| 5. | Orders Aer Lingus Ltd and Ireland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Aer Lingus Ltd and Ireland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1757 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1757

     To promote clean energy infrastructure for rural communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 20, 2011

  Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Bennet, and Ms. Klobuchar) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To promote clean energy infrastructure for rural communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Energy Infrastructure for 
Rural Communities Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. ELECTRIC LOANS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY.

    Section 317 of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 (7 U.S.C. 
940g) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``for electric generation'' and 
                inserting ``for--
            ``(1) electric generation'';
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) transmission facilities primarily for the purpose of 
        interconnecting 1 or more renewable energy facilities to a 
        high-voltage transmission line.''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (c).

SEC. 3. RURAL NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE.

    Section 310B(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act 
(7 U.S.C. 1932(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as 
                subparagraph (C); and
                    (B) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the 
                following:
                    ``(B) Natural gas.--The term `natural gas' means--
                            ``(i) unmixed natural gas; or
                            ``(ii) any mixture of natural and 
                        artificial gas.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as 
                subparagraph (E); and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the 
                following:
                    ``(D) improving the economic and environmental 
                climate by encouraging the development and construction 
                of infrastructure to provide access to natural gas in 
                rural communities; and''.
                                 <all>
```
| (1)  |  The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  |  The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.    |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                  |                                             |
|--------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |                  |                                             |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Jim      Place                          |   |
|   |                  | Jim      PlaceChief      Financial Officer  |   |
Exhibit 32.1
    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report of Nordion Inc. (the "Registrant") filed under cover of Form 40-F for the period ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven M. West as Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant and G. Peter Dans as Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. s.1350, as adopted pursuant to s. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:
 
 
 (1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ STEVEN M. WEST
 Name:           Steven M. West
 Title:           Chief Executive Officer
 Date:           January 20, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ PETER DANS
 Name:           G. Peter Dans
 Title:           Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
 Date:           January 20, 2011
 
 
 
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2013026EN.01005401.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/54

---

Action brought on 9 November 2012 — Grupo Bimbo v OHIM (SANISSIMO)

(Case T-485/12)

2013/C 26/109

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV (Mexico, Mexico) (represented by N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should find the present application and the accompanying documents to be duly lodged and admissible, take note that an action has been brought against the Decision of 29 August 2012 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) in Case R 1218/2011-2 and, following the appropriate procedural steps, give judgment annulling the abovementioned decision and expressly order the Office to pay the costs and, consequently, register Community trade mark application No 9.274.119 SANISSIMO.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘SANISSIMO’ for goods in Classes 29 and 30 — Community trade mark application No 9 274 119

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 7(3) of that regulation.

Pleas in law:

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

 

In connection with the quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, HenryJ. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for thepurposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 orotherwise subject to liability under this section.  This certification shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expresslyincorporated by reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated: September 2, 2005 | /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.     |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer        |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
# C_2015205EN.01002601.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2015 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Orly International (SPARITUAL)

(Case T-131/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the word mark SPARITUAL - Earlier Benelux figurative and word marks SPA and LES THERMES DE SPA - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 205/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Spa Monopole compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: L. De Brouwer, E. Cornu and É. De Gryse, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Orly International, Inc. (Van Nuys, California, United States) (represented by: P. Kremer and J. Rotsch, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM dated 9 January 2012 (Case R 2396/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV and Orly International Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 9 January 2012 (Case R 2396/2010-1) of the First Board Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 9 January 2012 (Case R 2396/2010-1) of the First Board Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

| 2. | Orders OHIM and Orly International, Inc. to each bear their costs and to pay the costs of Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM and Orly International, Inc. to each bear their costs and to pay the costs of Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.

1

---
# C_2014462EN.01003202.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/32

---

Order of the General Court of 10 November 2014 — Siegenia-Aubi and Noraa v Commission

(Case T-257/12) (1)

1

(2014/C 462/45)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.

1

---
# C_2014253EN.01001301.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom — United Kingdom) — Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others

(Case C-360/13) (1)

1

((Copyright - Information Society - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 5(1) and (5) - Reproduction - Exceptions and limitations - Creation of copies of an internet site on-screen and in the cache of the hard disk in the course of browsing the internet - Temporary act of reproduction - Transient or incidental act - Integral and essential part of a technological process - Lawful use - Independent economic significance))

2014/C 253/16

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd

Appellant:

Respondents: The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others

Respondents:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Supreme Court of the United Kingdom — Interpretation of Article 5(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10) — Reproduction right — Exceptions and limitations — Concept of temporary, transient or incidental acts of reproduction which constitute an integral and essential part of a technological process — Reproduction of a webpage which is automatically stored in the memory cache and on the screen of a computer

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5 of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that the copies on the user’s computer screen and the copies in the internet ‘cache’ of that computer’s hard disk, made by an end-user in the course of viewing a website, satisfy the conditions that those copies must be temporary, that they must be transient or incidental in nature and that they must constitute an integral and essential part of a technological process, as well as the conditions laid down in Article 5(5) of that directive, and that they may therefore be made without the authorisation of the copyright holders.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Annual Report of NBC Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark W. Oppegard,
President/Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.



                                            /s/  Mark W. Oppegard
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Mark W. Oppegard
                                            President/Chief Executive Officer
                                            June 26, 2008
(Reap. Dec. 9690)

#### Overseas Finance & Trading Co. By W. J. Byrnes & Co., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4476, etc.

(Decided May 3, 1960)

*Lawrence é Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States concerning the merchandise referred to in the attached Schedule “A”, as follows:

> 1. Said merchandise consists of binoculars and leather carrying cases which, in *John P. Herber & Co. Inc.*v. *United States,*C.D. 1519, this Court held to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of articles.

> 2. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers, in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, are the unit prices as shown in the attached schedule “A”, in United States currency, packing included, the foreign value of such or similar merchandise being no higher.

> 3. The appeals for reappraisement are limited to the items enumerated in Schedule “A” and abandoned in all other respects and the said appeals may be deemed submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I 'held export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the items referred to in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of this decision, and that such value is represented by the unit prices, as shown in said schedule “A” for the involved items, for the respective periods shown thereon, in United States currency, packing included.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HOLLY ANN CRAWFORD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 19 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of May, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Before the Third Division,

April 22, 1943

No. 48223.

#### Petition 6288-R of Daniel F. Young, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The vice president of the customs brokerage firm making the entry testified, among other things, that at the time of making the entry he represented a number of Japanese and Korean electric-light bulb importers, saw their invoices, and was familiar with the prices. He made entry at $7 per thousand pie'ces. The merchandise was appraised as entered. The collector filed an appeal for reappraisement, at which time it was shown that an importer at Bridgeport received an importation of similar merchandise on the same vessel, which merchandise was invoiced at $7.50 per thousand pieces. A stipulation was therefore entered into agreeing that the export value was $7.50 per thousand, less certain charges, and the court so found. In accordance therewith it was held that in making the entry in this case the petitioner acted without intention to misrepresent the facts or to defraud the revenue of the United States. The petition was granted.