alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-93229 and No. 333-166885) on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement (No. 333-166915) on Form S-3 of Datalink Corporation of our report dated March 1, 2011, relating to our audit of the financial statements and the financial statement schedule, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Datalink Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.  /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP  Minneapolis, Minnesota March 1, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1699-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1699-DR), dated May 6, 2007, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 11, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Kansas is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 6, 2007: 

Edwards, Pratt, and Stafford Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 

[FR Doc. E7-9782 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Exercise tests first responders, HQC workforce in reacting to shooter, bomber

By John R. Bell

**Lifelike Attack****Rapid Response****Team Effort****Adapting to the Threat****Volunteers Critical**

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

exerciseCOOPDLA Policeantiterrorismactive shooterIEDpreparednessemergencyevacuationHeadquartersInstallation Managementfirst respondershootingbomber
No. 55593.

#### The Shell Co. (Porto Rico), Limited *v.*United States,

protest 167799-K (San Juan).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 56773.

protest 173384-K (New York).

#### L. Greenberg & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the testimony it appeared that case 154 was ordered to public stores for regular examination and that only 60 dozen toy dogs were found in said case, although the invoice indicated that 600 dozen were to have been contained in each of the three cases involved. The importer advised the collector that only 60 dozen were found in each of the unexamined cases, thus making a total of 180 dozen received and 420 dozen short. It was stipulated that public store case 154 actually contained 60 dozen, rather than 200 dozen, as invoiced, and that it was full and intact. It was further agreed that the three cases were landed and delivered to the importer in good order. A claim was filed with the shipper of the merchandise and an allowance for the merchandise not shipped was received, together with a corrected invoice (exhibit 1). From the evidence presented, it was held that only 60 dozen toy dogs were imported in each of the three cases in question, rather than the invoiced quantity of 200 dozen. The claim of the plaintiff was sustained to this extent.
No. 55571.

#### L. Ruhe, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 169352-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of live birds similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alfred Mazer*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 67, C. D. 1265), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2012243EN.01000501.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank te Rotterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 18 May 2012 — Criminal proceedings against EBS Le relais Nord-Pas-De-Calais

(Case C-240/12)

2012/C 243/08

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank te Rotterdam

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

EBS Le relais Nord-Pas-De-Calais

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Where waste is shipped by vessel from an EU Member State (in this case France) to a State in which the OECD-Decision does not apply (in this case the United Arab Emirates), is there ‘transit’ within the meaning of the former (1) and the new (2) Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR) if under way the vessel puts in at a port of another EU Member State (in this case the Port of Rotterdam)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where waste is shipped by vessel from an EU Member State (in this case France) to a State in which the OECD-Decision does not apply (in this case the United Arab Emirates), is there ‘transit’ within the meaning of the former (1) and the new (2) Waste Shipment Regulation (WSR) if under way the vessel puts in at a port of another EU Member State (in this case the Port of Rotterdam)?

1

2

| 2. | Does it make any difference to the answer to question 1 if:






  — | there is storage and/or transhipment of that waste at that port and/or |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Does it make any difference to the answer to question 1 if:

—

there is storage and/or transhipment of that waste at that port and/or

| — | that waste is taken ashore and/or |
| --- | --- |

—

that waste is taken ashore and/or

| — | that waste is declared for import at customs? |
| --- | --- |

—

that waste is declared for import at customs?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community (former WSR) (OJ 1993 L 30, p. 1)

1

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste (new WSR) (OJ 2006 L 190, p. 1)

2

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Distribution Headquarters Employees Celebrate Jersey Day

By DLA Distribution Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
In the spirit of esprit de corps, DLA Distribution headquarters team members participated in Jersey Day, held Jan. 31 and Feb. 1. Team members came to work wearing their favorite player/team jersey.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA Distributionesprit de corpsjersey day
S. 1710 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 222 West 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, as the James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JAMES M. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse located at 

222 West 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, shall be known and 

designated as the ‘‘James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 

to be a reference to the ‘‘James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 139 

To provide that certain tax planning strategies are not patentable, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. 

WYDEN, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. ENZI, and Mr. KERRY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that certain tax planning strategies are not 

patentable, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Access to Tax 

5 Planning Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TAX STRATEGIES DEEMED WITHIN THE PRIOR ART. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of evaluating an in8 vention under section 102 or 103 of title 35, United States 

9 Code, any strategy for reducing, avoiding, or deferring tax 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 139 IS

1 liability, whether known or unknown at the time of the 

2 invention or application for patent, shall be deemed insuf3 ficient to differentiate a claimed invention from the prior 

4 art. 

5 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

6 term ‘‘tax liability’’ refers to any liability for a tax under 

7 any Federal, State, or local law, or the law of any foreign 

8 jurisdiction, including any statute, rule, regulation, or or9 dinance that levies, imposes, or assesses such tax liability. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICABILITY.—This section 

11 shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act and 

12 shall apply to any patent application pending and any pat13 ent issued on or after that date. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 39166.

#### Protests 209358-G, etc., of Oppenheim & Baruch, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items consist of allovers and articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
From: "Bob Davis (AMI)" <Bob.Davis@Airgas.com>

To: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 04/11/2008 09:42 AM Subject: RE: Comments received on the PGVP and Cost of 17025

Hello John: After a discussion with Doug King (our QA / QC manager) concernin g ISO 17025 the cost per facility for Airgas would be $60,000 for initial accreditation and it would cost another $10,000 to $20,000 per year for annual costs associated with ISO blends. Since Airgas has more plants that produce EPA protocols than any other vendor it would cost us well over $1,000,000 in combined labor and consulting fees within the next few years. The Protocol Gas Verification Program would be much more cost effective and would give an actual representation of the quality of EPA protoc ol gas cylinders. As you know one of our Airgas companies (Royal Oak Michigan) was ISO 17025 yet in the 2003 audit they still failed. The designation of ISO 17025 makes sure the proceedures are in place (by guidance) but it does not insure that they are followed (the results). Please do not hesitate to call me if you need further clarification. Thank you Bob Davis 610
- 675
- 6854

----- Original Message
----- From: Schakenbach.John@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Schakenbach.John@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, Apr il 08, 2008 1:56 PM To: Bob Davis (AMI) Subject: Fw: Comments received on the PGVP and Cost of 17025 Bob, I appreciate your offer to help. I sent these comments to Steve Mandel yesterday; you are welcome to respond to them as well. Also, since Airgas is ISO 17025 accredited, I'm wondering if you could give me an estimate for the initial and annual costs for being ISO 17025 accredited for producing EPA Protocol gases, for single component, bi
-blends and tri
-blends for common concentration ranges used by utility power plants. Thanks John Schakenbach U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Clean Air Markets Division schakenbach.john@epa.gov Phone: 202
- 343
- 9158 Fax: 202
- 343
- 2359
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1699-DR]


Kansas; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1699-DR), dated May 6, 2007, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 11, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Kansas is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 6, 2007:

    Edwards, Pratt, and Stafford Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E7-9782 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit 31.3 CERTIFICATION  I, Stephen A. Snider, certify that:  1.             I have reviewed this transition report on Form 10-K
of Universal Compression, Inc. (the registrant);  2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.             The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and have:  a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;  b)[RESERVED]  c)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d)disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.             The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.   Date:   March
  3, 2006
  /s/ Stephen A. SniderName:
  Stephen A. SniderTitle:
  Chief Executive Officer
No. 44342.

#### Protests 980786-G, etc., of Nippon Trading Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In the absence of proof that the glaze applied to the earthenware in question is transparent and does not contain an ivory tint, the protests were overruled. *Meakin*v. *United States*(T. D. 41843) followed.
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.sec. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, HenryJ. Boucher, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  November 12,  2003 | /s/Henry  J. Boucher, Jr.              |   |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | Henry  J. Boucher, Jr.,                |
|                                 | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----