### 68319 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 4, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in this portion of the Ouachita River in the vicinity of Monroe, LA between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. on October 15, 2016.

Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule will affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information

This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.

Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the **FOR**
**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the establishment of a special local regulation lasting four hours. Such actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated under

**ADDRESSES** . We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the **FOR FURTHER**
**INFORMATION CONTACT** section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waterways.

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

**PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233 ■ 2. Add § 100.35T08–0666 to read as follows:

**§ 100.35T08–0666 Special Local Regulation; Ouachita River; Monroe, LA.** 

(a) Regulated area. A regulated area is established to encompass the following waterway: all waters of the Ouachita River mile 173 through mile 166.5.

(b) Effective period. This section is effective and will be enforced from 10 a.m. until 2 p.m. on October 15, 2016.

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in § 100.801 of this part, commercial vessel operators desiring to operate in the regulated area must contact the Captain of the Port Memphis (COTP) to before doing so. The COTP or a designated representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or by telephone at 1–
866–777–2784.

(2) During enforcement, all vessels are to proceed at slowest speed for safe navigation while transiting the regulated

area.

(d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the regulated area as well as any changes in the dates and times of enforcement.

Dated: September 27, 2016. T.J. Wendt, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Memphis, Tennessee.
[FR Doc. 2016–23973 Filed 10–3–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 9110–04–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0189; FRL–9952–03– Region 6]** 

**Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of**  **Arkansas; Regional Haze and Interstate Visibility Transport Federal**  **Implementation Plan**

Correction

In rule document 2016–22508 beginning on page 66331 in the issue of Tuesday, September 27, 2016, make the following correction:

1. On page 66332, in the first column, after the **DATES** heading, the second line, ‘‘October 27, 2017’’ should read ‘‘October 27, 2016.’’

[FR Doc. C1–2016–22508 Filed 10–3–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 1301–00–D**