alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Roth, Andy" <rothaj@rapca.org>

To: "Koval, Paul" <paul.koval@epa.state.oh.us>, Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "McClure,

Diane" <Diane.McClure@epa.state.oh.us>

Date: 08/08/2012 02:12 PM

Subject: RE: Large Hard Chromium Electroplating sources in Ohio

I have the following test dates and emission rates:

U.S. Chrome 05/26/2004 0.0052 mg/dscm

Hohman Plating 05/16/2003 0.0115 mg/dscm

It is my understanding that the MACT limit is 0.015 mg/dscm.

Of course those are concentration value s. If you need mass emission rates, I can supply the ventilation

rates to you.

From: Koval, Paul [mailto:paul.koval@epa.state.oh.us]

Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 5:21 PM

To: Chuck French; McClure, Diane

Subject: RE: Large Hard Chromium Electroplatin g sources in Ohio

I forwarded this to the appropriate people in the local air agency. I will check again if they have made

any progress on getting some answers. Will let you know soon. PK

From: Chuck French [mailto:French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent : Tuesday, August 07, 2012 12:14 PM

To: McClure, Diane; Koval, Paul

Subject: Re: Large Hard Chromium Electroplating sources in Ohio

Hi Diane and Paul,

Did you receive my email from last week (shown below)? Do you think you might be able to find any

information on these 2 plants? If so, could you please send it within the next couple days, if possible.

Thanks.

Chuck

Phone: 919

- 541

- 7912Chuck French

--- 08/03/2012 05:38:26 PM

--- Hi Diane and Paul, Based on our data set, there are 2 Large

Hard Chromium Electroplating pla

From: Chuck French/RTP/USEPA/US

To: diane.mcclure@epa.state.oh.us, paul.koval@epa.state.oh.us

Date: 08/03/2012 05:38 PM

Su bject: Large Hard Chromium Electroplating sources in Ohio

Hi Diane and Paul,

Based on our data set, there are 2 Large Hard Chromium Electroplating plants in Dayton Ohio that are

among the higher emitting plants in the U.S. The 2 plants are U.S. Chrome Corporation of Ohio (107

Westboro Street, Dayton, OH), and Hohman Plating & Manufacturing (814 Hillrose Avenue, Dayton,

Ohio). Based on our data, they have emissions concentrations of 0.013 mg per dry standard cubic meter

(mg/dscm) and 0.012 mg/dscm, respe ctively. However, I believe these concentration estimates may be

based on tests that were conducted more than 12 years ago. Could you please let me know ASAP if Ohio

EPA has any newer test data for these 2 facilities, and if so what the results are? We wou ld really like to

know the exhaust gas concentration in mg/dscm. Also, if possible we would like to know what type of

control device they have on the large hard chromium electroplating processes, and the emissions

estimates in lbs/yr, if possible.

Thank Y ou.

Chuck French

Metals and Inorganic Chemicals Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA

Phone: 919

- 541

- 7912
May 21, 2015

U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,

Washington, DC 20590

Submitted Electronically via the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS)

Re: Addendum to Exemption Req uest under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of

the Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam:

Darryl W. Lee, has prepared the following addendum to his Exemption Request filed on April

24, 2015. This Addendum allows for the inclusion o f additional Vertical Take

- Off and Landing

(VTOL) UA’s as follows:

• DJI Phantom 3

• DJI Inspire 1

The UA’s listed above:

• Are produced by the same manufacturer as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in the original

request

• Have the same components as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in the original request

• Have the same operating procedures as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in original request

• Will be operated in the same manner as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ in the original request

THE UNMANNED AIRCRAFT (UA):

• DJI Models: Phantom 3, and Inspire 1 are lightweight (under 3lbs, and 6.5lb. gross

weight respectively), battery operated Multi

- Rotor VTOL aircraft

• An on

- board flight computer with GPS navigation and location ability that receives

signals for flight controls from a ground

- ba sed transmitter/controller

• An on

- board camera attached to the UA via three axis gimbal, capable of capturing full

color, high definition imagery

• An on

- board telemetry system that delivers flight data from the on

- board flight computer

to the on

- board radio transmitter including altitude AGL, horizontal and vertical speed,

compass direction of flight and direction back to its launch site

THE GROUND STATION

- BASED PART OF THE SYSTEM:

• A pilot in Command (PIC) in operation control of a flight operation from beg inning to

end and who controls the UA while in the air

• A radio transmitter/controller operated by the PIC to control the UA while in flight

• A Ground Station (Tablet or Smart Phone based App) which receives and displays real

time system telemetry and imager y from the UA

• A Visual Observer (VO) is a person who provides a second pair of eyes to visually track

the UA while in flight.

LEE

– ADDENDUM ADDING ADDITIONAL UA’s Page 1 of 2• Appendix A is part of the original request pertains to flight operations

• Append ix B is part of the original request and includes the DJI Phantom 2 Vision’s User’s

Manual

• Appendix C includes the DJI Phantom 3 and Inspire 1’s User Manuals.

This addendum makes no other changes to the original request including exemptions sought, reason s for

exemption request, and/or operating parameters.

The name and contact information of the applicant remains the same:

Darryl W. Lee

Phone: 512

- 868

- 7923

Email: deilee@msn.com

Appendix C

– Users Manual (Phantom 3 and Inspire 1)

LEE

– ADDENDUM ADDING ADDITIONAL UA’s Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX(C(

– (USERS(MANUALS(( DJI(PHANTOM(3

,( INSPIRE(1 )This(page(intentionally(left(blank

LEE

– APPENDIX C

– USERS MANUALS
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Careers for Women in the Biological Sciences

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Careers for Women in the Biological Sciences : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 278*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1961,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5545,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


                             IBS INTERACTIVE, INC.


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


         The following is a list of all of the subsidiaries of the IBS
Interactive, Inc. and the jurisdictions of incorporation of such subsidiaries.
All of the listed subsidiaries do business under their names presented below:

1.       CCL Telecommunication, Inc.
         Delaware
         (state of incorporation)

2.       IBS Holdings Corp.
         Delaware
         (state of incorporation)

3.       Halo Network Management, LLC
         New Jersey
         (state of formation)

4.       Spectrum Information Services, Inc.
         Alabama
         (state of incorporation)

5.       Realshare, Inc.
         New Jersey
         (state of incorporation)

6.       Spencer Analysis, Inc.
         New York
         (state of incorporation)

7.       digital fusion, inc.
         Florida
         (state of incorporation)
# C_2014085EN.01002502.xml

| 22.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/25

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 February 2014 — Bodson and Others v EIB

(Case F-73/12) (1)

1

(Civil Service - EIB staff - Contractual nature of the employment relationship - Reform of the EIB system of remuneration and salary progression)

2014/C 85/42

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Jean-Pierre Bodson and Others (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: C. Gómez de la Cruz, T. Gilliams and G. Nuvoli, acting as Agents, and P.E. Partsch, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the decisions contained in salary slips to apply the general decision of the European Investment Bank setting a salary progression capped at 2.8% for all staff and the decision establishing a merit grid entailing the loss of 1 % of salary and, second, a subsequent application for the institution to be ordered to pay the difference in remuneration together with damages.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Bodson and the seven other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Bodson and the seven other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012, p. 33.

1

---
# C_2013026EN.01007402.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/74

---

Action brought on 9 November 2012 — ZZ v REA

(Case F-135/12)

2013/C 26/154

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot, A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Research Executive Agency

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision not to include the Applicant on the reserve list of the REA/2011/TA/PO/AD5 selection procedure.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | To annul the decision of 21 February 2012 not to include the Applicant on the reserve list of the selection procedure REA/2011/TA/PO/AD5; |
| --- | --- |

—

To annul the decision of 21 February 2012 not to include the Applicant on the reserve list of the selection procedure REA/2011/TA/PO/AD5;

| — | to annul the decision of 10 August 2012 against the Applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

to annul the decision of 10 August 2012 against the Applicant’s complaint;

| — | to order to the Defendant to bear the entire costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

to order to the Defendant to bear the entire costs.

---
# C_2012355EN.01003802.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/38

---

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Western Digital and Western Digital Ireland v Commission

(Case T-60/12) (1)

1

2012/C 355/81

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Ke Marcus Cui, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of CHINA BAK
BATTERY, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.   The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
10th day of May, 2011.

| | /s/ Ke
      Marcus Cui                           
| | --------------------------------------------------
| | Ke Marcus Cui                                     
| | Interim Chief Financial Officer                   
| | (Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China BAK Battery, Inc. and will be retained by China
BAK Battery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
No. 53821.

protests 130266-K, etc. (New York).

#### Briones & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155). For the reasons stated in the cited authority, the first claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. It was also stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 113, C. A. D. 351). Following the cited authority it was held that an allowance in duties and internal revenue taxes should be made as to the merchandise respecting the quantities reported by the discharging inspectors as not landed, or as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to the extent indicated.
# C_2015081EN.01001502.xml

| 9.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 January 2015 — Tsujimoto v OHIM — Kenzo (KENZO)

(Case T-393/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark KENZO - Earlier Community word mark KENZO - Relative ground for refusal - Reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Duty to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Late submission of documents - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2015/C 081/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kenzo Tsujimoto (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: A. Wenninger-Lenz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Kenzo (Paris, France) (represented by P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 May 2012 (Case R 1659/2011-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Kenzo and Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Kenzo Tsujimoto to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.

1

---
No. 65807.

#### Nysco International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/27178 (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 96-552.

#### Agostini et al. *v.*Felton et al.; and *1142Chancellor, Board of Education of the City of New York, et al. *v.*Felton et al.

No. 96-553.

C. A. 2d Cir. [Certio-rari granted, 519 U. S. 1086.] Motion of Sarah Peter et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted.
Exhibit 31.1

            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc. of
Nevada;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


                                  /s/ Donald R. Mayer
Date: May 10, 2004               ____________________________________________
                                 Donald R. Mayer, Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.9
                                    ADDENDUM


        This ADDENDUM ("Addendum"),  dated March 29, 2002 and effective February
28, 2000, amends and supplements the Memorandum of Understanding ("Memorandum"),
dated December 22, 1998,  between  Nebraska Book Company,  Inc.  ("Company") and
Barry S. Major ("Executive") as follows:

1. On May  10,  2000,  Company  entered  into a  Management  Services  Agreement
("Agreement") with  TheCampusHub.com,  Inc.  ("CampusHub"),  under which Company
agreed to supervise and manage the day-to-day operations of CampusHub.

2. On or about February 28, 2000,  CampusHub  offered Executive a position as an
executive  officer of CampusHub.  Such position  would not require the full time
and  attention  of  Executive.  Executive  desires to accept the position and to
continue in his present position with Company.

3. Having  investigated  the  circumstances  of CampusHub's  offer to Executive,
Company  acknowledges  and agrees that  Executive's  employment  as an executive
officer of CampusHub would not  substantially  interfere with the performance of
Executive's duties under the Memorandum and,  consequently,  has no objection to
Executive accepting CampusHub's offer.

4. The parties acknowledge and agree that, to the extent Executive is performing
services  on behalf of  Company,  including,  but not  limited  to,  services in
furtherance of Company's  obligations  under the Agreement,  Executive  shall be
subject to the direction and control of the board of directors of Company,  but,
to the extent Executive is performing services on behalf of CampusHub, Executive
is subject to the direction and control of the board of directors of CampusHub.



                                             NEBRASKA BOOK COMPANY, INC.


                                             By:  /s/ Mark W. Oppegard
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Mark W. Oppegard
                                             Chief Executive Officer,
                                             President and Director


                                            EXECUTIVE


                                            By:  /s/ Barry S. Major
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Barry S. Major