alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A97A2367.

#### STRAHLEY v. PRUITT CORPORATION.

(512 SE2d 710)

Decided February 22, 1999.

*Robert D. Jones,*for appellant.

*Clifton, Sanders & Smith, Cecil L. Clifton, Jr.,*for appellee.

Ruffin, Judge.

In *Strahley v. Pruitt Corp.,*231 Ga. App. 502 (498 SE2d 78) (1998), we reversed the grant of summary judgment to Pruitt Corporation (Pruitt) on Strahley’s interference with a contract claim and affirmed the grant of summary judgment to Pruitt on Strahley’s claim of interference with business relations. In *Pruitt Corp. v. Strahley,*270 Ga. 430 (510 SE2d 821) (1999), the Supreme Court reversed our decision as to Strahley’s tortious interference with the contract claim. Accordingly, Division 1 of our prior opinion, dealing with the claim of tortious interference with a contract, is vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. Division 2 of our prior opinion, which affirmed the grant of summary judgment to Pruitt on Strahley’s claim of interference with business relations, was not affected by the Supreme Court’s decision and, therefore, stands.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Eldridge and Barnes, JJ, concur.*
# C_2013055EN.01002001.xml

| 23.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/20

---

Action brought on 27 December 2012 — Coppenrath-Verlag v OHIM — Sembella (Rebella)

(Case T-551/12)

2013/C 55/35

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Coppenrath-Verlag GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) (represented by: D. Pohl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sembella GmbH (Timelkam, Austria)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 October 2012 in Case R 1681/2011-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 October 2012 in Case R 1681/2011-2;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Rebella’ for goods in Classes 20 and 24 — Community trade mark application No 8 498 735

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Sembella GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘Sembella’ for goods in Classes 17, 20 and 22

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed and the application was accordingly rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 and infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
No. 99-10550 

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10550

Summary Calendar

 

TAIWO JIMI ADEOYE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CV-2445-H

--------------------

February 16, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Taiwo Jimi Adeoye, a Nigerian citizen and a detainee of the

Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”), appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus

petition for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Adeoye’s 

§ 2241 petition sought review of his deportation order and

requested that he be released on bond from INS custody pending

the resolution of his deportation proceedings. 

Adeoye’s motion for permission to file a late opposition to

the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot is GRANTED.
No. 99-10550 

-2-

During the pendency of this appeal, the INS’ Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) granted Adeoye’s motion to reopen his

deportation proceedings, rescinded Adeoye’s deportation order,

and remanded the case to the INS’ Immigration Court for further

consideration. Thus, to the extent that Adeoye’s § 2241 petition

was seeking review of his deportation order, Adeoye’s appeal is

moot and this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it. See

United States Parole Comm’n v. Geraghty, 445 U.S. 388, 395-96

(1980). 

Adeoye’s appeal is not moot, however, to the extent that his

§ 2241 petition sought review of his custody status. Because

Adeoye’s deportation proceedings commenced prior to the April 1,

1997, effective date of the Illegal Immigration Reform and

Immigrant Responsibility Act (“IIRIRA”), this case is governed by

pre-IIRIRA law. See IIRIRA § 309(c)(1); Anwar v. INS, 116 F.3d

140, 142-43 (5th Cir. 1997). Under former 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1)

(West 1996), a district court has habeas corpus jurisdiction to

review a custody determination pending a final decision of

deportability only “upon a conclusive showing . . . that the

[INS] is not proceeding with such reasonable dispatch as may be

warranted by the particular facts and circumstances” of the

deportation case. See Agbosasa v. Caplinger, No. 92-5180, slip

op. at 2-3 (5th Cir. May 5, 1993) (unpublished). Because Adeoye

has not conclusively shown that the INS has acted in an

unreasonably dilatory manner in handling his deportation

proceedings, the district court lacked, and this court lacks,
No. 99-10550 

-3-

jurisdiction to review Adeoye’s custody status. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(a)(1) (West 1996).

In light of the foregoing, the Government’s motion to

dismiss the appeal as moot is GRANTED IN PART, and Adeoye’s

appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
Exhibit 31.1

            PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Brett D. Mayer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bingham Canyon
Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                               /s/ Brett D. Mayer
Date:  November 10, 2004      ___________________________________________
                              Brett D. Mayer, Principal Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8770]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Revocation of Customs Broker License

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.

ACTION: General notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the 
following Customs broker license is canceled with prejudice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Name                  License No.       Issuing port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rosa E. Garcia......................        20053  Laredo.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: April 27, 2007.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. E7-8770 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  California  Clean Air, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report")  the
undersigned  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: Aug 14, 2006                 /s/ STEPHEN D. WILSON

                                    Stephen D. Wilson
                                    Title: President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                    Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
                                    Accounting Officer, Director
July 18, 2011 

Mr. Jeffrey Telander 

U. S. EPA Mailroom (D243-02) 

Office of AQPS 

ACMEJ 

BRICK 

~fit:/! / cf.9 / 

Certified Mail No.: 7009 1680 0000 93 16 6420 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 277 11 

Re: ICR Test Results 

Acme Brick - Elgin Plant (EPN 16) 

Dear Mr. Telander: 

Please find enclosed a flash drive containing the electronic files of the test results 

performed at the above referenced fac ility. 

If you have any questions, please call me at 817-870-8348. 

p:;::__ L__ 

Jason Pence 

EHS Manager 

Acme Brick Company 

cc: Susan Miller - Brick Industry Association 

ACME BRICK COMPANY 

P.O. Box 425 - Fort Worth, Texas 76 101- TEL: 8 171332-4101
#### H. W. Robinson & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6860.

Entry No. 741491, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, January 30, 1942, etc.

Certified February 4, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 5, 1942, etc.

(Decided February 11, 1947)

*Lane & Wallace*and *Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals list in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of counsel to the effect that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the agreed facts and following the pronouncements in *United States*v. *Pitcairn, supra,*I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importer to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar 'cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November      13, 2008 |   | /s/      Samuel W. Fairchild       |
|------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                                     |   | Samuel      W. Fairchild           |
|                                     |   | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                                     |   | (principal      executive officer) |

----

----
lps119060
#### The Summit Silk Company, appellant, v. Fidelity Trust Company of Baltimore, a corporation, &c., guardian of Emily E. DeForest, a lunatic, and Emily E. DeForest, respondents.

[Decided October 11th, 1918.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Lewis and reported in *88 N. J. Eq. 113.*

*Messrs. McDermott &*Enright, for the appellant.

*Messrs. Vredenburgh, Wall &*Carey, for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 12.

*For reversal*— None.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO
              18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350
              AS
      ADDED BY
              SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Peoples Financial Services
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alan Dakey, Chief
Executive Officer/President, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  To
my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.







By/s/
            Alan
      W. Dakey
              Chief
      Executive Officer/President





Date:
March 15, 2010
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on form 10-QSB of Futomic
Industries, Inc. for the quarter ending June 30, 2004, I, Ken Tetterington,
Chief Financial Officer of Futomic Industries, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such quarterly report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Futomic
          Industries, Inc.


Dated:    August 13, 2004

FUTOMIC INDUSTRIES, INC.

By:  /s/ Ken Tetterington
-----------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.                                        DanielR. McAuliffe, Jr. Citigroup Managed Futures LLC ChiefFinancial Officer and Director

March 28,2006                                                               Date

----
PUBLIC LAW 111–103—NOV. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 3015 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2215: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009): 

Sept. 22, 23, considered and passed House. 

Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–103 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 140 Merriman 

Road in Garden City, Michigan, as the ‘‘John J. Shivnen Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN J. SHIVNEN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John J. Shivnen Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John J. Shivnen Post Office Building’’. 

Approved November 30, 2009. 

Nov. 30, 2009 

[H.R. 2215] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLIC LAWS
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.4


                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 1998-B
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       of
                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that they are an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 1998-B and that they are duly
authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in
connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of April 1,
1998 (the "Indenture") and the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April
1, 1998 (the "Agreement"), among Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association,
as Servicer, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association and The Chase
Manhattan Bank, as Sellers, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee. All
capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective
meanings specified in the Indenture and the Agreement.

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under his supervision
and, to the best of his knowledge, the Issuer has fulfilled its obligations
under the Indenture for the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 26th
day of March, 2001.

                            CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 1998-B
                            BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual
                            capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee


                                     /s/ Denise Geran
                                     -------------------
                                     Name:  Denise Geran
                                     Title: Senior Financial Services Officer

Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer, hereby requests
that Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee, execute the above Issuer's
Certificate and deliver it to Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as
Indenture Trustee.

                                              CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                              NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer


                                              /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                                              --------------------------
                                              Richard J. Naeder
                                              Vice President
1 

### R i o s , G e r a rdo

F r om: S te v e H ill [ S H ill @ s i e rr a r e s ea rc h. c om ]
S e nt: W edne s da y

, A ugu s t 21, 2013 3:54 PM

T o: R i o s

, G e r a r do; Da vi d J en k i n s ( d j en k i n s @ ape x po w e rg r oup. c o m)
Cc: K ohn, Roge r ; Gr uben s te i n @S i e rr aRe s ea rc h. c o m; Magg i e F i t z ge r a l d; F o s te r , Me li ss a A .; He ll w i g, Ki m be r l y J .; Moo r e, S te ve S ub jec t: Pi o Pi c o PS D P e r m i t A pp li c at i on: P M2.5 BA C T Update

A tt ac hm e nt s: P M2 5 BA C T l ette r .pdf

O n Augu s t 1 6

, 2 0 13

, P i o P i c o s u b m i tte d a l e tte r ( w i t h e n cl o s e d d i s cs c o n t ai n i ng e l e c t r o n ic v e rs i o n s o f s o u rc e te s t r e p o rt s) t o E P A upd a t i ng i t s a n al y si s o f B A C T f o r

t h e L M S 1 0 0 c om bu s t i o n t u r b i n e s a t P i o P i c o E n e r g y C e n te r

.

An e l e c t r o n ic c o p y o f

t h a t l ette r is a t t ac h e d

.

P l e a s e d o n o t h e si t a te t o c o n t ac t m e if y o u h a v e a n y qu e s t i o n s

.

-- S te v e H ill