alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(commission file No. 333-93229), and on Form S-3(commission file No. 333-96901) of our reports dated January 26,2006, with respect to the financial statements and financial statement schedulefor the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 of Datalink Corporationwhich appear in this December 31, 2005 Annual Report of Form 10-K.

/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Minneapolis,Minnesota

March 31, 2006

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# USARCENT Powers Up with Renewable Energy

By Sgt. Von Marie DonatoU.S. Army Central

                SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Army Central website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Energy Action Monthenergy savingsenergy efficiencyU.S. Army Centralrenewable energy
# C_2014462EN.01001001.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 — Czech Republic) — Hoštická a.s., Jaroslav Haškovec, Zemědělské družstvo Senice na Hané v Česká republika — Ministerstvo zemědělství

(Case C-561/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy - Support schemes - Establishment of support schemes in the new Member States - Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 - Article 143ba - Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 - Article 126 - Separate sugar payment - Decoupling of that payment from production - Meaning of ‘the criteria adopted by the relevant Member States in 2006 and 2007’ - Representative period))

(2014/C 462/16)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Hoštická a.s., Jaroslav Haškovec, Zemědělské družstvo Senice na Hané

Applicants:

Defendant: Česká republika — Ministerstvo zemědělství

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 126(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘the criteria adopted by the relevant Member States in 2006 and 2007’ includes the marketing year which the Member States must choose before 30 April 2006 as the representative period for the grant of the separate sugar payment, under Article 143ba(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001, as amended by Council Regulations (EC) No 319/2006 of 20 February 2006, No 2011/2006 of 19 December 2006 and No 2012/2006 of 19 December 2006.

---

(1)  OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Of

Chief Executive Officer And

Chief Financial Officer

Of NATCO Group Inc.

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant
To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), I, John U. Clarke, Chief Executive Officer of NATCO Group Inc. (the Company), and, I, Richard W. FitzGerald, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge,
that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ John U. Clarke     
|                     |  |  |  | John U. Clarke         
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |  |  |                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard W. FitzGerald
|                     |  |  |  | Richard W. FitzGerald    
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

January 30, 1941

No. 45314.

#### Protest 981601-G of General Aniline Works, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the Ampho soap DN in question contains stearic acid derived from tallow it was held taxable at only 3 cents per pound on the weight of the stearic acid as claimed.
# C_2014409EN.01001401.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/14

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2014 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-277/13) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 96/67/EC - Article 11 - Air transport - Groundhandling service - Selection of suppliers))

2014/C 409/19

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and F.W. Bulst, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, T. Falcão and V. Moura Ramos, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take the necessary measures for the organisation of a procedure for the selection of suppliers authorised to provide groundhandling services for the categories of ‘baggage handling’, ‘ramp handling’ and ‘freight and mail handling’ at Lisbon, Porto and Faro airports, in accordance with Article 11 of Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 on access to the groundhandling market at Community airports, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that article; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take the necessary measures for the organisation of a procedure for the selection of suppliers authorised to provide groundhandling services for the categories of ‘baggage handling’, ‘ramp handling’ and ‘freight and mail handling’ at Lisbon, Porto and Faro airports, in accordance with Article 11 of Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 on access to the groundhandling market at Community airports, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that article;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 233, 10.8.2013.

1

---
# C_2017144EN.01006001.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/60

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2017 — T&L Sugars and Sidul Açúcares v Commission

(Case T-335/12) (1)

1

(2017/C 144/81)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.

1

---
No. 54964.

#### Joseph Blank et al. *v.*United States,

protests 157476-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

OliveR, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# AUSA LANPAC attendees learn about operational contracting support from DLA

By DLA Public Affairs

Attendees of the 2019 Association of the United States Army’s LANPAC Symposium and Exposition, held in Honolulu May 21-23, learned about operational contracting support from the Defense Logistics Agency. LANPAC is an international event highlighting the role of land forces throughout the Indo-Pacific region.

Matthew Beebe, director DLA Acquisition, shared details about the role OCS plays in support of regional combatant commanders while serving on a panel on the topic of global logistics. Operational contracting support is the process of planning for and obtaining supplies, services and construction material during an operation or contingency. The panel was chaired by Army Lt. Gen. Aundre Piggee, deputy chief of staff for Army logistics.

Other symposium topics included strengthening and building alliances and partnerships, and innovation and agility across the Indo-Pacific region.  

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

ausaLANPACocsoperational contracting support
#### Haupman Feather Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 5965.

Invoice dated Toronto, Canada, April 10, 1942.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 22, 1942.

Entry No. 16507.

(Decided December 21, 1943)

*Puckhafer, Rode & Rode (John D. Rode*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Walker, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, as follows:

> That the merchandise the subject of the above-entitled reappraisement consists of feathers and down exported from Canada on or about April 10, 1942;

> That the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Canada in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was as follows:

> 

> That there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise;

> That the above-entitled reappraisement be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

*342On the agreed facts I find tlie export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as follows:

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2012227EN.01002702.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/27

---

Action brought on 30 May 2012 — Rocket Dog Brands/OHIM — Julius-K9 (JULIUS K9)

(Case T-231/12)

2012/C 227/47

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rocket Dog Brands LLC (Heywood, USA) (represented by: C. Aikens, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Julius-K9 bt (Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | To annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 21 March 2012 (R 1124/2011-4) insofar as it rejects the Opposition in relation to all goods in class 25; and |
| --- | --- |

—

To annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 21 March 2012 (R 1124/2011-4) insofar as it rejects the Opposition in relation to all goods in class 25; and

| — | to order the Applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Opponent |
| --- | --- |

—

to order the Applicant to pay the costs incurred by the Opponent

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘JULIUS K9’ for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 28 — Community trade mark application No 8 542 201

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Two figurative marks depicting a dog, (crossed) bone(s) and the alphanumeric combination ‘K 9’ for goods in Classes 14, 18 and 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2014052EN.01002401.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/24

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale dell’Umbria — Italy) — Umbra Packaging srl v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale di Perugia

(Case C-355/13) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Rules of Procedure - Articles 53(2) and 99 - Possible to infer the answer to a question referred for a preliminary ruling clearly from the case-law - Request manifestly inadmissible - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive 2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive) - Article 3 - Imposition of a government authorisation charge when a telephone subscription is taken out - Charge not applied to the use of prepaid telephone cards - Article 102 TFEU)

2014/C 52/42

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Regionale dell’Umbria

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Umbra Packaging srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale di Perugia

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Commissione Tributaria Regionale dell’Umbria — Interpretation of Article 3 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21) and of Article 102 TFEU — National legislation imposing a fee on mobile telephone operators — Imposition of a government authorisation charge when a telephone subscription is taken out — Charge not applied to the use of prepaid telephone cards

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 3 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive), must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude national legislation such as that relating to the charge on activities carried out in the context of a government concession.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9899)

#### H. W. Ebert Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 706782; 722175; 923881.

(Decided January 10, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawRence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had oportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the *564merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

            Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code),  the  undersigned  officer of Interplay  Entertainment  Corp., a Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify  with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December  31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report") that:

          (1)  the 10-K Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  the information  contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in
               all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date:    April 15, 2009                   /S/ HERVE CAEN
                                          --------------------------
                                          Herve Caen
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Interim Chief Financial Officer