alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013233EN.01001001.xml

| 10.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/10

---

Order of the General Court of 2 July 2013 — Mederer v OHIM — Katjes Fassin (SOCCER GUMS)

(Case T-258/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 233/17

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mederer GmbH (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: O. Ruhl and C. Sachs, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Marten and R. Pethke, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz and C. Osterrieth, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 April 2012 (Case R 225/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mederer GmbH and Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 21.7.2012.

1

---
ex10_29.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
      10.29

     

    
      INVENTION
        TRANSFER AGREEMENT

      ANNEX
        NO. 1, PART 2, FORMING THE INSEPARABLE PART OF THE INVENTION TRANSFER
        AGREEMENT

      


      Dated
        13
        August 2007 (hereinafter: Agreement),
        entered into by and between KALMÁR NAGY Imre (residential
        address: 1022 Budapest, Alsótörökvész út 14., mother’s name: DUBECZ
        Margit)

      (hereinafter:
        Inventor),
        on the one hand;

      and
VIDATECHTechnológiai
        Kutató, Fejlesztő és Szolgáltató Korlátolt
        Felelősségű Társaság (head office: 1095 Budapest, Soroksári út 94-96.;
        company registration No.: 01-09-870107, recorded at the [Budapest] Metropolitan
        Court as Court of Registration, represented by: KUN Dániel Jr., Managing
        Director; hereinafter: Legal
        Successor).

      


      


      Invention:

      
        	
                1.  
                    

              	
                KALMÁR
                  NAGY Imre’s invention on the subject-matter of “Red mud neutralization
                  ”

              


      

      
        	
                2.   
                   

              	
                KALMÁR
                  NAGY Imre’s invention on the subject-matter of “PVC shielded electrical
                  cable recycling”

              


      

      
        	
                3.     

              	
                KALMÁR
                  NAGY Imre’s invention on the subject-matter of “Biodegradable de-icing
                  solution”

              


      

       

      


      Budapest,
        28 November 2007

      


      


      
        	
                /s/
                  Kalmar Nagy Imre

              	 	
                /s/
                  Daniel Kun

              
	
                KALMÁR
                  NAGY Imre,

                Inventor

              	 	
                Legal
                  Successor, the representative thereof

              
	 	 	 
	 	 	
                /s/
                  Rozsnyay Viktor

              
	 	 	
                on
                  behalf of

                Power
                  of the Dream Ventures, Inc.
# C_2015262EN.01001601.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2015 — PT Musim Mas v Council

(Case T-26/12) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia - Adjustment - Article 2(9) and (10)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis - Single economic entity - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of sound administration - Equality and non-discrimination))

(2015/C 262/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas) (Medan, Indonesia) (represented by: D. Luff, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, and initially by G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, Barrister, and subsequently by D. Geradin, lawyer, and lastly by E. McGovern, Barrister)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents); Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH (Hamburg, Germany); and Sasol Germany GmbH (Hamburg) (represented initially by V. Akritidis, lawyer, and J. Beck, Solicitor, and subsequently by V. Akritidis)

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 of 8 November 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia (OJ 2011 L 293, p. 1), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1241/2012 of 11 December 2012 amending Implementing Regulation No 1138/2011 (OJ 2012 L 352, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PT Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Musim Semi Mas (PT Musim Mas) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs;

| 4. | Orders Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH and Sasol Germany GmbH to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Sasol Olefins & Surfactants GmbH and Sasol Germany GmbH to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 17.3.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10.11

AMENDMENT NUMBER 4  TO THE MASTER EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER 4, dated as of May 31, 2002 (the "Amendment") to the Master Equipment Lease Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2001 (as
amended or supplemented from time to time as permitted thereby, the "Head Lease"), by and between BRL Universal Compression Funding I, L.P. (the "Head Lessor") and UCO Compression LLC (the "Head
Lessee").

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS,
the Head Lessor and the Head Lessee have previously entered into the Head Lease, Amendment Number 1 thereto, dated as of February 8, 2002, Amendment Number 2 thereto,
dated as of March 29, 2002, and Amendment Number 3 thereto, dated as of April 1, 2002;

WHEREAS,
the parties desire to further amend the Head Lease in order to modify certain provisions of the Head Lease;

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

SECTION
1.Defined Terms.Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned in
the Head Lease.

SECTION
2.Full Force and Effect.Other than as specifically modified hereby, the Head Lease shall remain in full force and effect in
accordance with the terms and provisions thereof and is hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto.

SECTION
3.Amendment to the Head Lease.Effective on the date hereof, following the execution and delivery hereof,



SECTION
4.Effectiveness of Amendment.



---



SECTION
5.Execution in Counterparts.This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute together but one and the same agreement.

SECTION
6.Governing Law.THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REGARD TO
CONFLICT OF LAW PRINCIPLES; PROVIDED THAT SECTIONS 5-1401 AND 5-1402 OF THE NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW SHALL APPLY, AND THE OBLIGATIONS, RIGHTS AND REMEDIES OF THE
PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

[Signature
page follows.]

2

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment on the date first above written.

| |  | BRL UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION
FUNDING I, L.P., as Head Lessor
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                      
| |  |                                                          
| |  |                                                          
| |  |                                                          
| |  | UCO COMPRESSION LLC, as Head Lessee                      
| |  | By:                                                      
| |  | Name:                                                    
| |  | Title:                                                   

3

---

QuickLinks
# market failure
John 0. Ledy ard From The New Pal grave Dictiona ry of E con omics, Secon d Edition, 2008 Edite d by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E

. Bl um e Alternate ve rs i ons avai lable: 1987 Edition Back to top 

### Abstract
Market fai l ure occurs when there are too few markets , non- competitive behaviour, or nonex i s tence , leadin g to inefficient allocation s. Many s ug ges ted so luti ons for market failure , such as tax- s ubs idy schemes, property rights assignments, and s pecial pricin g a rran gements , are s imp l y devices for the c reat ion of more mark e t s. This remedy can be b eneficial but, if the addition of markets creates either non-convexities or 

### thin parti c ipa tion, then adding markets will simply lead to market failure from monopolistic behaviour. Examples are natural monopolie s and informationa l monopolies. To achieve a more effic ient allocation of re sou rce s in the presence of such fundamental failures one must explore non-market a lternatives. Back to top 

### Keyw ords asymmetric i nfor m ation; cont in gen t claim s mark ets; free rider probl em; fundame ntal th eo rem of welfare economics; increasing returns to scale; Lindahl prices; market failu re; mechanism design; monopol y; monopsony; natural monopoly; non-competiti ve behavio ur; non-convexity; non-existence of equilibrium; Pareto effic iency; property rights rea ssignments; rational expec tations Back t o top 

### Article Clic k here to see the fu ll text article
No. 74-969.

#### Olympic Fastening Systems, Inc. *v.*Textron, Inc.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Dohrmann Commercial Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6854

Entry No. 645, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, June 10, 1941, etc.

Certified June 11, 1941, etc.

Entered at San Francisco, Calif., August 6, 1941, etc.

(Decided February 11, 1947)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (Frank L. Lawrence*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William C. Robinson, CEO, Chairman and Principal Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                           CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                        By: /s/ David M. Barnes
                                           -------------------------------------
                                            David M. Barnes
                                            Chief Financial Officer,
                                            Principal Financial and
                                            Accounting Officer

                                            February 7, 2007
Low Country RC Maintenance Manual

December 14, 2014

The safe operation of the UAS will be the responsibility of the Pilot in 

Command (PIC). The following procedures are to be reviewed before each 

flight. 

The PIC will follow the manufacturers UAS aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, 

and life limit requirements. When unavailable, aircraft maintenance/component/overhaul, replacement, and 

inspection/maintenance requirements must be established and identified in the operator’s manual. At a 

minimum, the following will be included in the operators manual:

a. Actuators / Servos 

b. Transmission (single rotor) 

c. Motors 

d. Propellers 

e. Electronic speed controller 

f. Batteries 

g. Mechanical dynamic components (single rotor)

h. Remote command and control 

i. Ground control station (if used) 

j. Any other components as determined by the operator 

Prior to each flight, the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure it is in a condition for safe flight. If the inspection 

reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the 

necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The 

Ground Control Station, if utilized, must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations 

must be properly documented in the aircraft records. 

Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, 

e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight in accordance with the 

operator’s manual. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the UAS aircraft 

records of the flight. The requirements and procedures for a functional test flight and aircraft record entry must 

be added to the operator’s manual. 

Prior to operations conducted for the purpose of video filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have 

accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51 (b), a minimum of twenty hours as UAS 

pilot operating the make and model of UAS to be utilized for operations under the exemption and three take-offs 

and three landings in the preceding 90 days. Training, proficiency, experience-building, and take-off and landing 

currency flights can be conducted under this grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time and 90 

day currency. During training, proficiency, experience-building, and take-off and landing currency flights all 

persons not essential for flight operations are considered non-participants, and the PIC must operate the UA 

with appropriate distance from non-participants in accordance with 14 CFR 91.119.
No. 48200.

#### Protest 40749-K/89597 of Oscar Leistner, Inc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The merchandise was assessed as manufactures of metal, not plated, at 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930, which is the rate claimed by the plaintiff. At the hearing it was agreed by counsel that the merchandise consists of metal calliope whistles; that the entry was liquidated on March 5, 1940, at 45 percent under paragraph 397; that the entry was reliquidated on June 15, 1940, at 70 percent under paragraph 1513; and that the reliquidation was not on account of fraud. Section 514 provides that the liquidation shall be final and conclusive against all persons after 60 days in the absence of fraud and in the absence of protest, and the court stated that this has been held to be a statute of limitations making liquidations final after the expiration of 60 days. *(McKesson*v. *United States,*T. D. 46955; *Pacific Brokerage Co.*v. *United States,*3 Cust. Ct. 20, C. D. 193; *Phipps*v. *United States,*22 C. C. P. A. 595, T. D. 47601.) No question of clerical error was involved. On the authority of the decisions cited it was held that the claim of the plaintiff was well founded and that the only valid liquidation was the original one. The protest was therefore sustained.
Registrant's Specimen Certificate for Shares



 Exhibit 4.2 
 SHARE CERTIFICATE 
  

			
	Certificate
Number                                	 	Number of
Shares                                

 ReneSola Ltd 
 (No: BC1016246) 
 (the “Company”) 
 Incorporated in the British Virgin Islands 
 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT
                                        
     of
                                        
     is/are the registered holder of
                                       
  share in the Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company. 
 Given under the Common Seal of the Company

 this      day of
                    , 
 _____________________________ 
 Director/Officer
No. 49478.

#### Protests 921434-G, etc., of Aoki Taiseido Book Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the books in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Aoki Taiseido*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 217, C. D. 757). The protests were therefore sustained to this extent.
No. 40473.

#### Protests 944976-G, etc., of Oldetyme Distillers, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the records presented the protests were overruled.
Exhibit 10.14

THIS DEED is made on                                         22 January     2007

BETWEEN

(1)     CLPE HOLDINGS LIMITED (registered number 3720212) whose registered
        office is at Unit 14&15 Queensbrook, Bolton Technology Exchange, Spa
        Road, Bolton, Greater Manchester, BL1 4AY ("Company"); and

(2)     DOUGLAS RALPH WILSON who resides at 312 Highland Ave., Ridgewood NJ
        07450, USA ("Associated Participant")

BACKGROUND

(A)     Under the CLPE Holdings Management Incentive Plan ("Plan") adopted by a
        resolution of the board of directors of the Company on 6 August 2003, a
        number of Associated Participants (as defined in the rules of the Plan)
        are entitled to a bonus payment which is contingent on the Sale as
        defined in the rules of the Plan) of the Company ("Bonus").

(B)     As at the date of this Deed, no Sale has taken place in respect of the
        Company.

(C)     The Associated Participant has agreed to waive his entitlement to a
        Bonus under the Plan in full.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS

1.      In consideration for the payment of (pound)1 (receipt of which is hereby
        acknowledged by the Associated Participant) the Associated Participant
        hereby waives all his interests in the Bonus and releases the Company
        from any obligation to make any payment under the Plan, whether such
        payment is contingent on a Sale or otherwise.

2.      The Associated Participant hereby undertakes not to seek to enforce the
        Bonus or any rights granted pursuant to the Plan and agrees that the
        Associated Participant has no entitlement to any compensation (whether
        by damages or otherwise) for the waiver of the Bonus or any other rights
        granted pursuant to the Plan.



                                       1
<PAGE>

THIS DOCUMENT is executed as a deed and delivered on the date stated at the
beginning of this Deed.


SIGNED as a deed by                  )           /s/ Harry H.P. Wyndham
CLPE HOLDINGS LIMITED                )           ----------------------
acting by                            )           Director
a director and its secretary         )
or two directors                     )


                                     Director    /s/ Andrew T. West
                                                 ------------------



SIGNED as a deed by                  )           /s/ Douglas R. Wilson
DOUGLAS RALPH WILSON                 )
in the presence of:                  )


Witness signature:       /s/ D. H. Fitzherbert


Name:                    D. H. Fitzherbert
Address:                 12 Gordon Place
                         London N845D

Occupation:              Company Director




                                       2
Order entered April 27, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00450
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M .T . , A CHILD On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 12
- 19981
- S

ORDER
Th is is an appeal in a parental t er mination case

. Before the Court is court reporter Joie Rivera’s April 23, 2020 letter requesting a ten

- day extension to file the reporter’s record and informing th e Court that she has been unable to obtain the exhibits.
We GRANT the request. To the extent the exhibits have not been made available to Ms. Rivera, we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to give all original exhibits to Ms. Rivera no later than 3:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 29, 2020 for use in preparing the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 34.6(g). Ms. Rivera shall return the original exhibits to Ms. Pitre within twenty

-four (24) hours of copying the exhibits for use in the record. See id. To the extent

the exhibits are timely made available to Ms. Rivera, we ORDER the reporter’s record be filed no later than May 7, 2020. If any of the original exhibits are in the possession of someone other than Ms. Pitre, Ms. Pitre shall notify th e Court and Ms. Rivera in writing by 12:00 p.m. noon on Tuesday, April 28, 2020 of the name of the person, contact information for that person, and a list of the exhibits in that person’s possession. See id.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a cop y of this order to the Honorable Kim Cooks, Presiding Judge of the 255 th Judicial District Court; Ms. Pitre; Ms. Rivera; and the parties. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE