alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Land and Maritime recruits at The Ohio State University Economics Fair

DLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime participated in a fall career fair at the College of Arts and Sciences Economics Department on Sept. 19. Students interests about DLA included internships, recent graduate program, locations, mission, training opportunities, tuition assistance and the organizational culture. Recruiter David Lanzillotta, of DLA Land and Maritime’s People and Culture Directorate, shared the news about the careers DLA has to offer as well as the great benefits, flexible work schedule and retirement plan. Over 25 students visited the DLA booth. Students that visited the booth were college majors in finance and economics.

For information about DLA job openings, visit www.USAJobs.gov and search for “DLA” in the search field. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Culture L&MDLA L&MResource the Enterprise L&MCareers L&MCommunity L&MPACER/Intern L&M
Before the Second Division,

October 4, 1943

No. 48825.

#### Protest 969590-G of Absorbo Beer Pad Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

The record established that the merchandise is of the same dutiable character as that passed upon in *Absorbo Beer Pad Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 176, C. D. 748), the record in which case was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Alberta Newbern, Defendant.

County Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

April 15, 1966.

*Alfred L. Plesser*for defendant. *William Cahn, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

Martin M. Kolbrener, J.

Defendant moves to suppress evidence, which she claims, was illegally seized by the police following the death of her husband. She has been indicted for the crime of manslaughter in the first degree. A motion to dismiss or to inspect the Grand Jury minutes has been denied. She has been granted a hearing on the motion to suppress.

*1008The testimony adduced by the prosecution indicates that the police were called to defendant’s home and when they arrived they found the deceased lying in the driveway about 15 feet from the entrance door. The deceased was bleeding from his chest. There were some people nearby and when Officer Meininger asked “ Who did it? ” defendant stepped forward from the crowd and said “ I did it. I stabbed him with a knife.” The officer placed defendant under arrest. Another officer went into the house with defendant and saw the knife in question in the bathroom. It was bloody. The defendant identified it as the knife with which she stabbed her husband. In my opinion the search was lawful and a reasonable exercise of police duty following the arrest of the defendant. *(Agnello*v. *United States,*269 U. S. 20; *United States*v. *Rabinowitz,*339 U. S. 56.)

In *United States*v. *Rabinowitz (supra,*p. 60): *“*The right to search the person incident to arrest always has been recognized in this country and in England. *Weeks*v. *United States,*232 U. S. 383, 392.

At page 61: “ Decisions of this Court have often recognized that there is a permissible area of search beyond the person proper. Thus in *Agnello*v. *United States,*296 U. S. 20, 30, this Court stated: ‘ The right without a search warrant contemporaneously to search persons lawfully arrested while committing crime and to search the place where the arrest is made in order to find and seize things connected with the crime as its fruits or as the means by which it was committed, as well as weapons and other things to effect an escape from custody, is not to be doubted. ’ ”

At page 65: *“*A rule of thumb requiring that a search warrant always be procured whenever practicable may be appealing from the vantage point of easy administration but wo cannot agree that this requirement should be crystallized into a *sine qua non*to the reasonableness of a search. It is fallacious to judge events retrospectively and thus to determine, considering the time element alone, that there was time to procure a search warrant. Whether there was time may well be dependent upon considerations other than the ticking off of minutes or hours. * * * Some flexibility will be accorded law officers engaged in daily battle with criminals for whose restraint criminal laws are essential.” It is therefore ordered that the motion is denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Exercise planner honored for support to Pacific Sentry

By DLA Indo-Pacific

Army Capt. Ryan Campbell, a joint logistics plans officer for Defense Logistics Agency Indo-Pacific, was recognized for his support during Pacific Sentry in a July ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.

Campbell was presented the Joint Service Achievement Medal by Navy Capt. Kristin Acquavella, DLA Indo-Pacific commander. According to the citation, Campbell flawlessly planned and oversaw DLA’s participation in the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command exercise. Employees from DLA Headquarters and six DLA major subordinate commands provided around-the-clock operations to the DLA Indo-Pacific Logistics Operations Center at Camp Smith, Hawaii. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Pacific SentryDLA Indo-PacificDLA Indo-Pacific Logistics Operations Center
EXHIBIT 32.2



      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Nebraska Book Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan G.
Siemek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



                                          /s/  Alan G. Siemek
                                          --------------------------------------
                                           Alan G. Siemek
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           June 25, 2004
No. 43223.

#### Protest 972307-G of Montgomery Ward & Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Wolf*(26 C. C. P. A. 243, C. A. D. 23) the microscope sets in question were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 228 (b) as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

            Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code),  the  undersigned  officer of Interplay  Entertainment  Corp., a Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify  with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December  31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report") that:

(1)      the 10-K Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information  contained in the 10-K Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:    April 3, 2008

                                      /S/ HERVE CAEN
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Herve Caen
                                      Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Interim Chief Financial Officer
No. 55589.

#### Joseph Blank et al. *v.*United States,

protests 162654-K, etc. (New York).

*441Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
No. 49487.

#### Protests 27587-K, etc., of Browne Vintners Co., Inc., et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests
#### Mark COOPER, Appellant, v. LEHIGH CONCRETE PUMPING SERVICE, INC., Joseph Franko, Consolidated Rail Port and Pennsylvania Department Transportation.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Oct. 19, 1998.

Decided Nov. 9, 1998.

Robert C. Daniels, Robert J. Mongeluzzi, Philadelphia, Larry Benedesky, for Mark Cooper.

John F. Kent, Philadelphia, Dennis P. McBride, for Lehigh Concrete Plumbing Service, Inc.

Joseph W. Gibley, Media, for Com., Dept, of Transp.

Jenny P. Shulbank, Philadelphia, for PECO.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert Rudman, President and Chief Executive Officer of SmarTire Systems Inc., and Jeff Finkelstein, Chief Financial Officer of SmarTire Systems Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SmarTire Systems Inc. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SmarTire Systems Inc.

|Dated: October 16, 2003 |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                       
|                        |  |                                       
|                        |  | /s/ Robert Rudman                     
|                        |  | Robert Rudman                         
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer,
|                        |  | SmarTire Systems Inc.                 
|                        |  |                                       
|                        |  |                                       
|                        |  | /s/ Jeff Finkelstein                  
|                        |  | Jeff Finkelstein                      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer,              
|                        |  | SmarTire Systems Inc.                 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SmarTire Systems Inc. and will be retained by SmarTire Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-757

_____________________________

VINCENT GRAHAM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Gilbert L. Feltel, Jr., Judge.

September 14, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Vincent Graham, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Case No. 14,038a.

#### TILFORD et al. v. OAKLEY.

[Hempst. 197.] *1*

Superior Court, Territory of Arkansas.

1832.

Equity — Adequate Remedy at Law — Bill to Enforce Money Decree.

A bill m chancery is not the proper remedy to enforce a decree in chancery for the payment of *1223money, the remedy at law being adequate and .complete.

Appeal from Hempstead circuit court

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from the decree of the circuit court of Hempstead county, pronounced in a cause wherein John Tilford & Co. were complainants, and Allen M. Oakley, defendant dismissing the complainants’ bill. The complainants filed their bill to enforce a decree-of the Bath circuit court df the state of Kentucky, decreeing the defendant Oakley to pay a specific sum of money. The only question for the consideration of this court is, whether a bill in chancery is the.appropriate remedy to enforce a decree in chancery for> the • payment of a specific sum of money. ‘ We think it is not the proper remedy. The complaint had a clear and complete remedy at law, by an action of debt founded on the decree. Thompson t. Jameson, 1 Cranch. [5 U. S.] 282; Post v. Neafie, 3 Caines, 22; Sadler v. Robins, 1 Camp. 253. Decree affirmed.
# C_2012331EN.01002802.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/28

---

Action brought on 30 August 2012 — Singer v OHIM — Cordia Magyarország Ingatlanforgalmazó Zártkörüen Müködö (CORDIO)

(Case T-388/12)

(2012/C 331/54)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Daniela Singer (Obertrubach, Germany) (represented by: B. Korom, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cordia Magyarország Ingatlanforgalmazó Zártkörüen Müködö rt (Budapest, Hungary)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 July 2012 in Case R 1842/2011-2 |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 July 2012 in Case R 1842/2011-2

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘CORDIO’ for services in Class 42 — Community trade mark application No 9 115 262

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Cordia Magyarország Ingatlanforgalmazó Zártkörüen Müködö rt

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word mark ‘CORDIA’ for services in Classes 36, 37 and 42

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law: There is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

---
# C_2012343EN.01001602.xml

| 10.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/16

---

Action brought on 20 August 2012 — Brouwerij Van Honsebrouck v OHIM — Beverage Trademark (KASTEEL)

(Case T-374/12)

2012/C 343/27

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Brouwerij Van Honsebrouck (Ingelmunster, Belgium) (represented by: P. Maeyaert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Beverage Trademark Co. Ltd BTM (Tortola, British Virgin Islands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul in its entirety the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 June 2012 in Case R 2551/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in its entirety the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 June 2012 in Case R 2551/2010-2;

| — | order OHIM and Beverage Trademark Co. Ltd BTM to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and Beverage Trademark Co. Ltd BTM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The international figurative mark incorporating the word element ‘KASTEEL’ for goods in Class 32 — International registration No W 975 635

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Beverage Trademark Co. Ltd BTM

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National mark ‘CASTEL BEER’ for goods in Class 32

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law:

Pleas in law:

| — | Breach of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Breach of Article 42 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 42 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
[No. 14506.

Department Two.

April 27, 1918.]

#### Bertha Feldman, *Respondent,*v. Samuel L. Feldman, Appellant.1

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Whatcom county, Hardin, J., entered February 24, 1917, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for divorce, tried to the court.

Affirmed.

*Eimon L. Wienir,*for appellant.

*S. M. Bruce,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 172 Pac. 884.

Holcomb, J.

The statement of facts on appeal having been stricken on motion, all claims of error by appellant are eliminated save those as to the conclusions of the court to the effect that respondent should have judgment dissolving the marriage, that she be awarded one-half the lands of the parties, and the decree to the same effect, and providing alternatively that appellant should pay to respondent $2,000 in lieu of her rights in and to the property set apart to appellant, with a lien therefor upon the property.

The complaint states a cause of action for divorce for cruelty and abuse. The court found the allegations true, setting out specific conduct constituting cruelty and abuse. Such being the finding and the record not being before us, we are bound by it. The conclusions and decree therefore necessarily followed.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., Mount, Fulleeton, and Chadwick, JJ., concur.