alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

February 25, 1942

No. 46987.

#### Protest 23396-K of Dolliff & McGrath (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the collector assessed duty on the basis of the steel bars as valued above 1)4 cents per pound. From the record it was found that exhibit 2 in the case checks with the number of packages here in question and the weight of the merchandise in kilos. The total amount of freight stated thereon agrees with the amount stated on the invoice. This was therefore held to be positive evidence that the ocean freight was based upon the weight and not upon the value of the merchandise, and should have been prorated accordingly, but the court was without proof whether the item “cost of carriage to port and loading,” which is a nondutiable charge, was based on weight or value. The court therefore held that the liquidator should have adopted as a basis for prorating the item of ocean freight, the weight of the bundles of steel bars involved, in order to arrive at the rate of duty assessable thereon. To that extent the plaintiffs’ claim was sustained.
Exhibit
13.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a-14(b)/RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT


AND
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Fundtech Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yoram Bibring, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May
28, 2010





/s/
      Yoram BibringName:
      Yoram BibringTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Fundtech Ltd. and will be retained by Fundtech
Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2012389EN.01000501.xml

| 15.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) (United Kingdom) made on 3 October 2012 — Actavis Group PTC EHF, Actavis UK Ltd v Sanofi

(Case C-443/12)

2012/C 389/07

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Actavis Group PTC EHF, Actavis UK Ltd

Applicants:

Defendant: Sanofi

Defendant:

Third party: Sanofi Pharma Bristol-Myers Squibb SNC

Third party:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | What are the criteria for deciding whether ‘the product is protected by a basic patent in force’ in Article 3(a) of Regulation 469/2009/EC (1) (‘the Regulation’)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

What are the criteria for deciding whether ‘the product is protected by a basic patent in force’ in Article 3(a) of Regulation 469/2009/EC (1) (‘the Regulation’)?

1

| 2. | In a situation in which multiple products are protected by a basic patent in force, does the Regulation, and in particular Article 3(c), preclude the proprietor of the patent being issued a certificate for each of the products protected? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In a situation in which multiple products are protected by a basic patent in force, does the Regulation, and in particular Article 3(c), preclude the proprietor of the patent being issued a certificate for each of the products protected?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products

1

OJ L 152, p. 1

---
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7652.

Invoices dated Longton, England, June 1945, etc.

Certified June 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 19, 1945, etc.

Entry No. 702489, etc.

(Decided January 26, 1949)

*John B. Rafter*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard F. Weeks,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This proceeding has been submitted upon a stipulation wherein the parties hereto have agreed that the issues involved in the reappraise-ments listed in schedule “A”, hereto attached and made a. part hereof, are the same in all material respects as in the ease of *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334. The record in that case was admitted as part of the record herein.

In view of the aforesaid stipulation and accepting same as a statement of fact, and in view of the decision cited, I find and hold that the export values of the merchandise are the values found by the appraiser, less any additions on entry by the importer by reason of advances by the appraiser in similar cases to equal the so-called British purchase tax.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Fw: Response to your edits from page 104 to the end of the draft NOx SOx 

proposal

Jan King to: Sherry Russell 07/12/2011 09:14 AM

Jan King

Regulatory Development and Policy Analysis Group

phone: (919) 541-5665

fax: (919) 541-2664

Mailcode: C404-05

----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/12/2011 09:10 AM -----

From: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet 

McCabe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ginger Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich 

Scheffe/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Randy Waite/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan 

King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/11/2011 03:43 PM

Subject: Response to your edits from page 104 to the end of the draft NOx SOx proposal

Jim -- Please find attached our response to the edits you sent us on the rest of the draft NOxSOx 

proposed rule (from about page 104 to the end).

Karen Martin, Ph.D.

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. EPA (C504-06)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

phone: (919) 541-5274

fax: (919) 541-0237

martin.karen@epa.gov

Lydia Wegman Jim, Please find attached our response to the e... 07/11/2011 03:02:47 PM

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ginger 

Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich Scheffe/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan 

King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/11/2011 03:02 PM

Subject: Response to your edits on the first 104 pages of the draft NOx SOx proposal

Jim, 

Please find attached our response to the edits you sent us on Thursday evening to the first 104 pages of 

the draft NOx/SOx proposed rule. We are continuing to work on the responses to the remainder of your 

comments and plan to get those to you before our 4 PM meeting. Thanks. 

[attachment "NOxSOx 7-11-11-compare 6-16 to 7-11v5.docx" deleted by Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US]
#### Amy Elizabeth Sumrall FOLK v. Michael Thomas FOLK.

No. 98-CC-3194.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1999.

In re Folk, Michael Thomas; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge Family Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, Div. “C”, No. 111,590, 111,602; to the Court of Appeal, first Circuit, No. CW98 2600.

Denied.

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.
# C_2013352EN.01001502.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2013 — Zoo Sport v OHIM — K-2 (ZOOSPORT)

(Case T-453/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ZOOSPORT - Earlier Community word mark ZOOT and earlier Community figurative mark SPORTS ZOOT SPORTS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 352/28

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zoo Sport Ltd (Leeds, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Rungg, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: K-2 Corp. (Seattle, United States of America) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 August 2012 (Case R 1119/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between K-2 Corp. and Zoo Sport Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Zoo Sport Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Zoo Sport Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Susquehanna hosts annual Children’s Trout Derby

By DLA Distribution Public AffairsDLA Distribution Public Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania  –              The annual Children's Trout Derby was held on May 20 at the Children’s Trout Pond located on Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna. 
The Children’s Trout Pond was stocked with over 150 trout for children and their families to fish and enjoy quality time together. This year's event featured giveaways for the children to include fishing posters, fish ID guides, children's fishing rod combo packs and various chances to win a $20 Cabela’s gift card.

Unfortunately, the infamous Palomino Trout was not caught during the derby. New Cumberland Federal Credit Union staff hosted children’s activities and Shugar's Philly Deli provided children's lunch sub combos and snack trays for the adults.

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionMWRTrout DerbyCommunity Relations
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Edward A. Keible, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, asamended, of Endwave Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: September 23, 2005 /s/ EDWARD A. KEIBLE, JR.   Edward A. Keible, Jr.   President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB-A, Amendment # 1 for the quarter ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: September 19, 2008



| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Donald B. Cohen                       
| | Donald B. Cohen                           
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
Searched for **https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/marijuana-facts-parents-need-to-know/letter-to-parents**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/marijuana-facts-parents-need-to-know/letter-to-parents**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
No. 50746.

#### Protests 57746-K, etc., of Benziger Bros., Inc., et al. (New York).

*349Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 39125.

#### Protest 618980-G of Moscahlades Bros., Inc. (New York).

*361Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the fluid in which the olives were packed is used only as a preservative and is discarded when the olives are removed from the containers. On the authority of *Von Bremen*v. *United States*(T. D. 46643) and *Lippincott*v. *United States*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 29, T. D. 38646) it was held that the olives in question are dutiable on the invoice net weight exclusive of the oil and vinegar in which they are packed.
# C_2012379EN.01001701.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/17

---

Action brought on 9 October 2012 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

(Case C-453/12)

2012/C 379/29

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, D. Martin and J.-P-Keppenne, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that by not adopting the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation adjusting, from 1 July 2011, the rate of contribution to the pension scheme of officials and other servants of the European Union, the Council has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Staff Regulations and under the notional fund scheme provided for in those Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by not adopting the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation adjusting, from 1 July 2011, the rate of contribution to the pension scheme of officials and other servants of the European Union, the Council has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Staff Regulations and under the notional fund scheme provided for in those Regulations;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicant claims that the Council infringed Articles 83 and 83a of the Staff Regulations and the provisions contained in Annex XII to the Staff Regulations, by refusing to adopt the Commission’s proposal for a Regulation which proposes to adjust, from 1 July 2011, the rate of contribution to the pension scheme of officials and other servants of the European Union, even though according to the binding wording of those provisions the annual adjustment of that rate is an automatic procedure which leaves the Council with no discretion.

According to the applicant, the refusal of the Council to adopt the Commission’s proposal for a regulation and, accordingly, to lower the rate of contribution by officials, infringes not only Article 83(2) of the Staff Regulations, by requiring the officials to make an excessive contribution, but also Article 83a(1) of the Staff Regulations, by placing at risk the balance of the notional fund scheme which guarantees the pensions of officials and other agents.

Finally, according to the Commission, by laying down the method of calculation of the rate of contribution by officials and servants precisely in Annex XII to the Staff Regulations, the European Union legislature left the Council with no discretion and obliged it to adopt the Commission’s proposals within a reasonable period of time.

---
# C_2014159EN.01003801.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/38

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (2nd Chamber) of 10 April 2014 — Nieminen v Council

(Case F-81/12) (1)

1

((Civil service - Promotion - 2010 promotion procedure - 2011 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant - Duty to state reasons - Examination of comparative merits - Administrators assigned to linguistic functions and administrators assigned to functions other than linguistic functions - Promotion quotas - Consistency in the duration of the merits))

2014/C 159/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Risto Nieminen (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: C. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers, initially, then C. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Herrmann and M. Bauer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decisions not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 12 in respect of the 2010 and 2011 promotion procedures.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Nieminen to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Nieminen to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29.09.2012, p. 34.

1

---
# C_2013046EN.01003307.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/33

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 December 2012 — Goddijn v Europol

(Case F-106/12)

2013/C 46/73

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---