alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Written Consent of InPatient Consultants Management, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.23 
 WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF A MEETING 
 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF 
 INPATIENT CONSULTANTS MANAGEMENT, INC 
 a Delaware Corporation 
 JANUARY 31, 2007 
 The undersigned, constituting the entire Board of Directors (“the Board”) of InPatient Consultants Management, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), deeming it advisable that the following resolutions be adopted, hereby unanimously consent in writing, pursuant to the provisions of Section 141(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, to the
adoption of the following resolutions and agree that such resolutions shall have the same force and effect as if they were approved and adopted at a duly constituted meeting of the Board: 
 Amendment to 2002 Equity Participation Plan 
 WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed a form of Amendment to the Company’s 2002 Equity Participation Plan (the “Plan”) that reflects an increase in the number of shares of the Company’s common stock which may be issued
under the Plan to Three Million Four Hundred Thousand (3,400,000), as more particularly set forth in the Amendment to the Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A: and 
 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to adopt the Amendment to the Plan. 
 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, that the Amendment to the Plan be, and it hereby is, approved and adopted in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and shall be submitted to the stockholders of the Company
for approval. 
 General Authorization 
 RESOLVED FURTHER, that all acts and things heretofore done by the Board or any of the Officers, on or prior to the date of the adoption of the foregoing resolutions, in connection with the actions contemplated by such resolutions be, and
each of them hereby are, in all respects, ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted as acts on behalf of the Company. 
 (Signature Page to
Follow) 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Written Consent as of the above date, thereby
agreeing that the foregoing recitals and resolutions shall be of the same force and effect as if regularly adopted at a meeting of the Board held upon due notice. 
  

	
	DIRECTORS
	
	 /s/ Adam Singer

	Adam Singer, M.D.
	
	 /s/ Mark Brooks

	Mark Brooks
	
	 /s/ Robin Bellas

	Robin Bellas
	
	 /s/ Richard Blume

	Richard Blume
	
	 /s/ Barry Smith

	Barry Smith
	
	 /s/ Tom Smith

	Tom Smith
	
	 /s/ Jeff Taylor

	Jeff Taylor
	
	 /s/ Chuck Timpe

	Chuck Timpe
	
	 /s/ Wayne Lowell

	Wayne Lowell


  

 -2- 








 EXHIBIT A 
 AMENDMENT TO 2002 EQUITY PARTICIPATION PLAN 
 The second sentence of Section 2.1( a)
shall be amended to read as follows: 
 “The aggregate number of such shares which may be issued upon exercise of any Option or other
right to acquire shares of Common Stock under any other Award under the Plan shall not exceed Three Million Four Hundred Thousand (3,400,000) shares.” 
  


 -3-
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the PBSJ Corporation (the Company) hereby
certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                                     
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ John B. Zumwalt III             
|                         |  |  |  | John B. Zumwalt III                 
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer             
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald J. Vrana                 
|                         |  |  |  | Donald J. Vrana                     
|                         |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28074-28075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated December 14, 2006, and published in the Federal 
Register on December 22, 2006, (71 FR 77065-77066), Johnson Matthey 
Inc., Custom Pharmaceuticals Department, 2003 Nolte Drive, West 
Deptford, New Jersey 08066, made application by letter to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of 14-Hydroxymorphinone (9654), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk as an intermediate for use in the production of another 
controlled substance.

[[Page 28075]]

    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Johnson Matthey Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of 
controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey Inc. to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: May 9, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-9639 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# C_2012157EN.01000702.xml

| 2.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/7

---

Action brought on 7 March 2012 — Buzil-Werk Wagner v OHIM — Roca Sanitario (Roca)

(Case T-115/12)

2012/C 157/12

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Buzil-Werk Wagner GmbH & Co. KG (Memmingen, Germany) (represented by: D. Waldhauser, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Roca Sanitario, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 9 January 2012 (Case No R 1907/2010-4) and reject the opposition brought by Roca Sanitario, SA, Av. Diagonal, 513, E-08029 Barcelona (Spain). |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 9 January 2012 (Case No R 1907/2010-4) and reject the opposition brought by Roca Sanitario, SA, Av. Diagonal, 513, E-08029 Barcelona (Spain).

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Roca’ for goods in Class 3 (application No 6 800 726)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Roca Sanitario, SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the Spanish trade marks ‘Roca’ (trade mark Nos 1 020 043, 2 543 451, 424 875 and 915 635) for certain goods in Classes 19 and 21 and the international trade mark ‘Roca’ (trade mark No 905 212) for certain goods in Classes 11, 19, 20 and 21

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: partial rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: annulment of the Opposition Division’s decision and rejection of the Community trade mark application in respect of all the goods applied for

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: There is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2012098EN.01002602.xml

| 31.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/26

---

Action brought on 6 February 2012 — ABC-One v OHIM (SLIM BELLY)

(Case T-61/12)

2012/C 98/43

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ABC-One Produktions- und Vertriebs GmbH (Villach St. Magdalen, Austria) (represented by S. Merz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 November 2011 in Case R 1077/2011-1 concerning the application for registration of the word sign ‘SLIM BELLY’ as a Community trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 November 2011 in Case R 1077/2011-1 concerning the application for registration of the word sign ‘SLIM BELLY’ as a Community trade mark;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SLIM BELLY’ (application No 8 576 811) for goods and services in Classes 28, 41 and 44

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009 as the mark applied for has distinctive character and is not descriptive of the goods and services at issue

Pleas in law:

---
**Exhibit 32.1** **CERTIFICATION**      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted),Edward A. Keible, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Endwave Corporation (the “Company”), and Brett W.Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:      **1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the ***“Quarterly Report”***) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and      **2. **The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.      **InWitness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 5th day of November,2007.    /s/ Edward A. Keible, Jr. /s/ Brett W. Wallace           Edward A. Keible, Jr. Brett W. WallaceChief Executive Officer Chief Financial OfficerThis certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofEndwave Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.
#### W. R. Zanes & Company *v.*United States

No. 8068.

Entered at Houston, Tex.

Entry Nos. 143-H; 180-H.

(Decided December 10, 1951)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff,

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been ■submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the attorneys fof the parties hereto:

> That the instant appeal to reappraisement covers first-grade canned corned beef exported from Argentina and packed 48 cans, 12 ozs. each, or 12 cans, 6 lbs. ■each, to the case.

> That on or about the date of exportation, such or similar merchandise was freely ■offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of Argentina in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States at the following prices:

> 48 cans, 12 ozs. each — $11.00 per case

> 12 cans, 6 lbs. each — $19.50 per case

> That on or about the date of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Argentina.

> That the instant appeal to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> 48 cans, 12 ozs. each — $11 per case

> 12 cans, 6 lbs. each- — $19.50 per case

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 42083.

#### Protest 94628-G of R. H. Macy & Co. Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of Normandy laces, embroidered-cotton net curtains, articles embroidered and in part of laces, and embroidered-lace window curtains similar to those the subject of *Amrein*v. *United States*(T. D. 49551). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
# C_2013189EN.01002401.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/24

---

Order of the General Court of 7 May 2013 — Cat Media Pty Ltd v OHIM — Avon Products (RETANEW)

(Case T-246/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to rule)

2013/C 189/49

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cat Media Pty Ltd (Warriewood, Australia) (represented by: I. De Freitas, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Avon Products, Inc. (New York, United States) (represented by: U. Stelzenmüller, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 March 2012 (Case R 740/2011-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Avon Products, Inc. and Cat Media Pty Ltd.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to rule on the appeal |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to rule on the appeal

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Liberty Group Operating,
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
     annual period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



         Dated: March 31, 2003                   /s/ Kenneth L. Serota
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 Kenneth L. Serota
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.



<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Liberty Group Operating,
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
     annual period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



         Dated: March 31, 2003                   /s/ Daniel D. Lewis
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Daniel D. Lewis
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
No. 95-1455.

No. 95-1508.

#### Reno, Attorney General *v.*Bossier Parish School Board et al.; and Price et al. *v.*Bossier Parish School Board et al.

D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 517 U. S. 1232.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for divided argument granted.
FAA Home
Air Traffic
Flight Information
Aeronautical Information Services
Digital Products

# VFR Raster Charts

- 
- ShareShare
- 

- Facebook					Share on Facebook
- Twitter					Tweet on Twitter

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) digital-Visual Chart series is designed to meet the needs of users who require georeferenced raster images of FAA Visual Flight Rules (VFR) charts. An Aeronautical Raster Chart is a digital image of an FAAVFR Chart. All information that is part of the paper chart is included in the file. The area inside the neat line is georeferenced to the surface of the earth. Only the main body of the chart is accurately georeferenced.

Each digital-Visual Chart is provided in one TIF file. The files are 300 dots per inch and 8-bit color. The product is provided as a GeoTIFF and is available for public viewing from this website.  As each paper chart is updated, its raster equivalent is also updated and available for viewing on this website. Please ensure you are using the most current chart by referring to the chart legend.

Charts in compressed (ZIP) format contain a TIF, geospatial and metadata files. Additional format charts are provided as Portable Document Format (PDF).

For Current and Next Effective Dates see the DOLE September 05, 2024

      - Sectional
      - Terminal Area
      - Helicopter
      - Grand Canyon
      - Caribbean
      - Planning
      - 56-Day Sets

Western Aleutian Islands Sectional is divided into an East and West side. Hawaiian Islands Sectional includes the Honolulu, Samoan Islands, and Mariana Islands Insets as separate georeferenced files. Georeferencing information for all other insets should be disregarded.

            - Sectional Chart Index
            - Sectional Chart Index: Alaska

            - Temporary Flight Restrictions

**Next Editions will be available 20 days prior to their effective date.** Please report any application errors and provide comments via the portal's Website category.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. sec. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A forthe period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Forrest P. Jordan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  September 23, 2004 | /s/Forrest  P. Jordan    |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                       | Forrest P.  Jordan       |
|                       | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----