alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JAMAR BLAINE PERRY,

Petitioner

v.

JUDGE JOHN D. MCBRIDE, JUDGE 

KIM TESLA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY 

JOHN LEE BROWN, DISTRICT 

ATTORNEY AHMED AZIZ AND 

PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY 

GENERAL,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 49 WM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2023, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The 

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the names of the jurists from the caption.
# C_2013046EN.01003203.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/32

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Scheidemann v Parliament

(Case F-109/12)

(Civil service - Officials - Interinstitutional transfer during the promotion exercise during which the civil servant was eligible for promotion in her institution of origin - Application to benefit from a retroactive promotion - Specific rejection decision which took effect after the implicit decision - Time-limit for lodging a complaint - Out of time - Out of time)

2013/C 46/65

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sabine Scheidemann (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application to annul the decision of the Parliament to reject the applicant’s application to be promoted retroactively from 1 January 2010.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | Mrs Scheidemann shall bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mrs Scheidemann shall bear her own costs.

---
# C_2015007EN.01003101.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2014 — Conrad Electronic v OHIM — British Sky Broadcasting Group and Sky IP International (EuroSky)

(Case T-510/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark EuroSky - Earlier Community word mark SKY - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 007/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Conrad Electronic SE (Hirschau, Germany) (represented by: P. Mes, C. Graf von der Groeben, G. Rother, J. Bühling, J. Künzel, D. Jestaedt, M. Bergermann, J. Vogtmeier and A. Kramer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, interveners before the General Court: British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (Isleworth, United Kingdom); and Sky IP International Ltd (Isleworth) (represented by: J. Barry, Solicitor, R. Heine and M. Plesser, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, interveners before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 September 2012 (Case R 1138/2011-4), concerning opposition proceedings between British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and Sky IP International Ltd, on the one hand, and Conrad Electronic SE, on the other.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Conrad Electronic SE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), by British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and by Sky IP International Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Conrad Electronic SE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), by British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and by Sky IP International Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Careers for Women in Retailing

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Careers for Women in Retailing : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 271*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1963,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5540,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit
      10.1


    SECOND
      SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT made this 17TH
      day of
      December 2007 by and between Lippert Components Manufacturing, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”) and Jason D. Lippert (The “Executive”).

    


    WHEREAS,
      on October 7, 2005, the Company and the Executive entered into an Executive
      Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, which was amended on June 26, 2006
      and
      supplemented on April 17, 2007 (as amended and supplemented, the “Agreement”);
      and

    


    WHEREAS,
      the Company and the Executive desire to further supplement the Agreement as
      set
      forth herein effective January 1, 2008, and agree that all capitalized terms
      and
      terms in quotes used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
      Agreement, except as otherwise provided herein.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein
      contained, it is agreed as follows:

    


    
      	 	
              1.

            	
              Supplement
                to Agreement.

            


    

    


    1.1
      Subject to Section 6.3 of the Agreement, in addition to the Base Salary and
      Bonus provided in the Agreement, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary
      contained therein, the Executive shall be entitled to receive additional
      incentive compensation for 2008 in the amount of Two Hundred Forty Nine Thousand
      ($249,000) Dollars if the LCI Entities achieve a return on assets (“ROA”) for
      2008 of twenty four percent (24%) percent, which additional incentive
      compensation will increase at the pro-rata rate of Thirty Thousand ($30,000)
      Dollars per one (1%) percent increase in ROA in excess of 24% (the “ROA Bonus”);
      provided, however, that the aggregate Bonus and ROA Bonus for 2008 shall not
      exceed ten (10%) percent of the “operating profits of the LCI Entities” for
      2008. For purposes hereof “return on assets” shall mean the “operating profit of
      the LCI entities” for 2008 divided by the average “net assets” employed by the
      LCI Entities during 2008.

    


    1.2
      The
      term Bonus in Section 6.3 of the Agreement, shall mean the Bonus and the ROA
      Bonus, collectively.

     

    
      	 	
              2.

            	
              No
                Other Changes. 

            


    

    


    Except
      as
      set forth in this Supplemental Agreement, all terms, provisions, conditions
      and
      restrictions contained in the Agreement, shall remain in full force and
      effect.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this Second
      Supplemental Agreement effective as of the day and year first mentioned
      above.

    


    
      	 	
              Lippert
                Components Manufacturing, Inc.

            	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
              By
                

            	   
	 
	 	 	
            	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
              Jason
                D. Lippert
null

42.88708
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 379th Maintenance Squadron maintains process improvement

By SSgt. Enjoli Saunders379th AEW/PA

                Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

379th Expeditionary Maintenance Squadron379th Air Expeditionary Wingtiresrepairmaintenance
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 94-7117
RONALD BISHOP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NOVA L. ANDREWS; MASON WATERS; DAVIS ARDINGER; GALVIN BALLARD; MARVIN PRINTZ; R. ROSENBERRY; B. L. SOUDERS; ELLIS R. WILLIAMS; EARL J. WHISNER; D. K. HORNING, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA93-1186-S) Submitted: January 22, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Bishop, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bishop v. Andrews , No. CA-93-1186-S (D. Md. Aug. 29, 1994).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2013147EN.01003403.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/34

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2013 — Pepi v ERCEA

(Case F-33/12) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Contract staff - Auxiliary contract staff - Recruitment - Classification on recruitment - Articles 3a, 3b and 86 of the CEOS - ERCEA - Internal rules on the classification of members of the contract staff)

2013/C 147/65

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jean Pepi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Research Council Executive Agency (represented by: M. Oliván Avilés and G. Bambara, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of the applicant’s contract with the ERCEA in so far as he is classified at Grade AD 10.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Mr Pepi shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Research Council Executive Agency. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Pepi shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Research Council Executive Agency.

| 3. | The Council of the European Union, the intervener, shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Council of the European Union, the intervener, shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012, p. 23.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Today, he's Levi Hayden, tomorrow's next champion

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Levi Hayden, the 6-year-old grandson of DLA Land and Maritime’s Dan and Esther Hayden, participated in a National Drive, Chip and Putt Competition qualifier on June 21 in Toledo, Ohio.  The Finals will be held during Masters Week next April in Augusta, Georgia. 

Augusta National Country Club is every golfer’s dream, not just to play but even to be able to walk the course one time.  Dan hopes he’s in that group next April and dreams of watching Levi on the Augusta course.

Levi competed in the 7-9 age group, and while he missed the cut to go to Augusta and compete, he had a valiant showing for his first appearance.  He’s more determined than ever, working on his chipping and putting with “Pop” Dan every day since the competition.  He told Pop, “I’m winning my division next year!”

Go Levi!

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Land and MaritimeCulture L&MFortify the Culture L&MWellness L&MResilency L&M
# C_2014102EN.01003501.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2014 — Sartorius Lab Instruments v OHIM (Representation of a yellow curve)

(Case T-331/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Application for a Community trade mark consisting of a representation of a yellow curve at the bottom edge of an electronic display unit - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2014/C 102/55

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sartorius Lab Instruments GmbH & CO. KG (Göttingen, Germany), given leave to replace Sartorius Weighing Technology GmbH (represented by: K. Welkerling, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 May 2012 (Case R 1783/2011-1), concerning an application for registration of a sign composed of a yellow curve at the bottom edge of an electronic display unit as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Sartorius Lab Instruments GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sartorius Lab Instruments GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, of 22.9.2012.

1

---
No. 47668.

#### Protest 4548-K, etc., of International Novelty Import Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the Christmas wreaths in question are similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Minami*(29 C. C. P. A. 169, C. A. D. 188), some of them were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 353 and others at 25 percent under the same paragraph as modified by the Treaty with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753). Protests sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Technologies
Group, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
the undersigned, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: September 14, 2009
                                             /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                             -----------------------------------
                                       Name: Alex Stelmak
                                             Alex Stelmak
                                             Chief Executive Officer,
                                             Chairman of the Board and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

The USDA Forest Service published a Notice of Intent (69 FR 59881-59883, October 6, 2004) to prepare an environmental impact statement for a proposed forest plan amendment for surface management of gas leasing and development on the Jicarilla Ranger District, Carson National Forest. In addition, the proposal includes a leasing analysis for approximately 3,800 unleased acres on the Jicarilla Ranger District. 

                        A draft environmental impact statement has been completed and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a Notice of Availability (NOA) in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 16, 2007 (72 FR 54900). The end of the comment period presented in the NOA was incorrect and subsequently rectified in an amended notice (72 FR 9521, March 2, 2007).                     

# CORRECTED DATES: 

                        The Notice of Intent (NOI) stated the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) was scheduled for completion in early summer of 2005. This Notice corrects the estimated filing date of the FEIS from early summer 2005, to the fall 2007. When completed, EPA will publish a NOA of the FEIS in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Kuykendall, Forest Environmental Coordinator, Carson National Forest, at (505) 758-6212. 

Dated: May 15, 2007. 

Martin D. Chavez, Jr., 

Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest.

 [FR Doc. E7-9271 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P