### 28955 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 97 / Thursday, May 19, 2011 / Notices

1 On August 27, 2010, the Convention for the Strengthening of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Established by the 1949 Convention Between the United States of America and the Republic of Costa Rica ( ‘‘Antigua Convention ’’ ) entered into force for countries that have deposited their instrument of ratification. Pursuant to Article XXXI of the Antigua Convention, the 1949Convention for the Establishment of an InterAmerican Tropical Tuna Commission will be considered terminated upon the entry into force of the Antigua Convention for all Parties to the 1949 Convention. The United States is a party to the 1949 Convention and signatory to the Antigua Convention. As of the date of this Federal Register notice, the United States has not ratified the Antigua Convention. Therefore the 1949 Convention remains the basis of the United States’ membership in the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. measures to which the United States has lodged an objection or reservation, consistent with the terms of such agreement. At the time this notice was prepared, the United States had not objected to, or taken a reservation against, any such measures.

A list of agreements resulting in international conservation and management measures was first published in the Federal Register in 1996 (61 FR 11751, March 22, 1996). Where applicable, the updated list of agreements is organized by ocean areas and includes the organization created by the agreement. Agreements to Which the United States Is Party

Atlantic Ocean

Convention for the Conservation of Salmon in the North Atlantic Ocean (Basic Instrument for the North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization— NASCO);

Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries (Basic Instrument for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization—NAFO);

International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (Basic Instrument for the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas—ICCAT); Pacific Ocean

Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation Program (AIDCP);

Convention for the Conservation of Anadromous Stocks in the North Pacific Ocean (Basic Instrument for the North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission— NPAFC);

1949 Convention for the Establishment of an Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (Basic Instrument for the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission—IATTC); 1

Convention on the Conservation and Management of Pollock Resources in the Central Bering Sea; Treaty on Fisheries between the Governments of Certain Pacific Island States and the Government of the United States of America (South Pacific Tuna Treaty—SPTT);

Convention for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (Basic Instrument for the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission—WCPFC);

Southern Ocean

Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (Basic Instrument for the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources—CCAMLR);

Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals (CCAS);

Other

Convention for the Prohibition of Fishing with Long Driftnets in the South Pacific Ocean; and

International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (Basic Instrument for the International Whaling Commission—IWC). Agreements To Which the United States Is Not Party

Agreement for the Establishment of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (Basic instrument of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission—IOTC);

Convention on the Conservation and Management of Fisheries Resources in the Southeast Atlantic Ocean (Basic instrument for the South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization—SEAFO);

Convention for the Strengthening of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Established by the 1949 Convention Between the United States of America and the Republic of Costa Rica ( ‘‘Antigua Convention’’ ; Basic instrument for the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission—IATTC);

Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna (Basic instrument for the Commission on the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna—CCSBT);

Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in North-East Atlantic Fisheries (Basic instrument for the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission—NEAFC); and

Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway and the Government of the USSR Concerning Cooperation in the Field of Fisheries.

This listing of ‘‘ international conservation and management measures recognized by the United States ’’ will be revised and updated from time to time by publication in the Federal Register

. The inclusion or exclusion of items from this listing is without prejudice to any positions or views the United States Government may take or express with regard to such items in the future. This notice is not intended to and does not otherwise operate to amend, supplement, revise or supersede the regulations implementing the HSFCA at 50 CFR 300.15.

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 5501–5509. Dated: May 12, 2011. Samuel D. Rauch III, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–12339 Filed 5–18–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–22–P**

**CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE** 

**Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request** 

**AGENCY :**  Corporation for National and Community Service.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Corporation for National and Community Service (hereinafter the

‘‘ Corporation’’ ), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork andrespondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) (44 U.S.C. Sec. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirement on respondents can be properly assessed.

Currently, the Corporation is soliciting comments concerning its revised Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Application Instructions using the Corporation’s Electronic Application System, eGrants. Completion of the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Application Instructions is required for funding considerations.

Copies of the information collection request can be obtained by contacting the office listed in the addresses section of this notice.

**DATES :**  Written comments must be submitted to the individual and office listed in the **ADDRESSES** section by July 18, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by the title of the information


### 28956 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 97 / Thursday, May 19, 2011 / Notices

collection activity, by any of the following methods:

(1) By mail sent to: Corporation for National and Community Service, Georgia State Office; Attention Ms. Rochelle Barry, State Program Director, Suite 1600; 401 West Peachtree Street, NW., Atlanta, GA 30308.

(2) By hand delivery or by courier to the mail address given in paragraph (1) above, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

(3) By fax to: (404) 331–2898, Attention Ms. Rochelle Barry, State Program Director.

(4) Electronically through the Corporation’s e-mail address system: mlkgrants@cns.gov or http:// www.regulations.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :** Rochelle Barry, (404) 965–2102, or by email at mlkgrants@cns.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The OMB is particularly interested in comments which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Corporation, including whether the information will have practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

• Propose ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

• Propose ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. Description The purpose of these Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Grants is to mobilize more Americans to observe the Martin Luther King, Jr. Federal Holiday as a day of service in communities and to bring people together around the common focus of service to others. The Corporation will award these funds to eligible applicants who will in turn subgrant to eligible local organizations or fund separate events to plan and carry out service activities. Background

The Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Grant application is completed by applicant organizations interested in supporting an MLK Day of Service Program. The application is completed electronically by using the Corporation’s Web-based system, eGrants.

Current Action

The Corporation seeks to create renewal application instructions specifically for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service grants. When finalized, the application will include additional instructions to clarify narrative and budget sections; will contain an updated list of ‘‘ Service Categories ’’ used by applicants to identify the types of needs the national service participants will meet; and will contain current references used in the grants management system.

Type of Review: Renewal. Agency: Corporation for National and Community Service.

Title: Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Application Instructions.

OMB Number: 3045–0110. Affected Public: Eligible applicants to the Corporation for National and Community Service for funding of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day of Service Grants.

Total Respondents: 80. Frequency: Annual. Average Time per Response: Ten (10) hours. Estimated Total Burden Hours: 800 hours.

Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): None.

Total Burden Cost (operating/ maintenance): None.

Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval of the information collection request; they will also become a matter of public record.

Dated: May 13, 2011. Robert Velasco, II, Acting Chief of Program Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011–12265 Filed 5–18–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**[Transmittal No. 11–11]**

**36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification**

**AGENCY :**  Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. John Unglesbee, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703)
601–6026.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 11–11 with attached transmittal and policy justification.

Dated: May 15, 2011. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**