alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# F1 tornado touches down at Oklahoma City distribution center

DLA Distribution Public Affairs

                OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla.  –              
On Tuesday, Oct. 9 at approximately 8:10 a.m. central time, an F1 tornado touched down in vicinity of DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Oklahoma’s buildings 510 and 506. Personnel were directed to take shelter and command was able to obtain 100 percent accountability with zero injuries. 

Building 510, a bulk warehouse was closed down and checked for structural damage. There were reports the roof raised up and down three times.  Additionally Building 510’s ventilation units were ripped from rooftop. While another unit appeared to be just sitting on the roof. A Yellow Trucking Trailer blew over while parked at the Building 506 shipping dock.  Oklahoma City personnel have begun emergency repairs with debris removal and repairing the damage to Building 510.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionDistributionOklahoma CityF1 tornado
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Eugene Boyle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Eugene Boyle
Eugene Boyle
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1741 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1741

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an investment tax 
 credit for community wind projects having generation capacity of not 
            more than 20 megawatts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 20, 2011

Mr. Franken (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an investment tax 
 credit for community wind projects having generation capacity of not 
            more than 20 megawatts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Wind Act''.

SEC. 2. INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT FOR COMMUNITY WIND PROJECTS HAVING 
              GENERATION CAPACITY OF NOT MORE THAN 20 MEGAWATTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 48(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the 
        following new subparagraph:
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `qualified small wind 
                energy property' means--
                            ``(i) property which uses a qualifying 
                        small wind turbine to generate electricity, or
                            ``(ii) property which uses 1 or more wind 
                        turbines with an aggregate nameplate capacity 
                        of more than 100 kilowatts but not more than 20 
                        megawatts.'', and
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D) 
        and by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Regulations.--The Secretary shall prescribe 
                such regulations as may be appropriate to prevent 
                improper division of property to attempt to meet the 
                limitation under subparagraph (A)(ii).''.
    (b) Denial of Production Credit.--Paragraph (1) of section 45(d) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the period at 
the end and inserting ``or any facility which is a qualified small wind 
energy property described in section 48(c)(4)(A)(ii) with respect to 
which the credit under section 48 is allowable.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7632

DAVID FELTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ERNEST SUTTON, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-928-1) Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 29, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:David Felton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Felton v. Sutton , No. CA-99-928-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2000). We also deny Felton’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### C. J. Tower & Sons et al. *v.*United States

No. 6172.

Invoices dated South Devon, N. B., Canada,.November 20, 1941, etc.

Entered at Buffalo, N. Y., November 26, 1941; Niagara Falls, N. Y., December 2, 1941; Port Huron, Mich., December 8, 1941; Rouses Point, N. Y., December 4, 1939; St. Albans, Vt., November 29, 1941; etc.

Entry Nos. 4799; NF 4062; A 2353; A 2083; 2597; etc.

(Decided June 19, 1945)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P„ Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Speclor,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, wherein it is agreed, in substance, as follows:

*360(1) That the'instant merchandise is the same in all material respects as the imported Christmas trees involved in *United States*v. *G. R. Kirk Co., F. W. Myers & Co.,*Reap. Dec. 5636.

(2) That the issues herein (except as to the *per se*values of the trees) are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in said decision.

(3) That the record in the *Kirk*case, *supra,*may be incorporated in and made a part of the record in the present case.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as set forth in schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

> Schedule B

> 

> Schedule B

>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

Theforegoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liabilityunder this section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the ExchangeAct except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly incorporatedby reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated: June 15, 2006 |   | /s/Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                      |   | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.    |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer       |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1752 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1752

 To nullify certain regulations regarding the removal of essential-use 
   designation for epinephrine used in oral pressurized metered-dose 
                               inhalers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 20, 2011

  Mr. Roberts introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To nullify certain regulations regarding the removal of essential-use 
   designation for epinephrine used in oral pressurized metered-dose 
                               inhalers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom to Breathe Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION OF FINAL RULE; PROHIBITION.

    (a) Nullification of Final Rule.--As of the date of enactment of 
this Act, the final rule entitled ``Use of Ozone-Depleting Substances; 
Removal of Essential-Use Designation (Epinephrine)'' (73 Fed. Reg. 
69532 (November 19, 2008)) shall have no force or effect.
    (b) Prohibition on Future Regulations.--In no case may the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services reissue the final rule described 
in subsection (a) in substantially the same form, or issue a new rule 
that prohibits the production and distribution of oral pressurized 
metered-dose inhalers because such inhalers may emit 
chlorofluorocarbons or other green house gas emissions, unless the 
reissued or new rule is specifically authorized by a law enacted after 
the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
2001 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-24-2001

Doe v. Delie

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 99-3019

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2001 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Doe v. Delie" (2001). 2001 Decisions. Paper 165.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001/165
Filed July 24, 2001 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 99-3019 

JOHN DOE, 

 Appellant 

v. 

JOAN DELIE, Health Care Administrator; 

PAUL NOEL, Medical Director; DIANE MANSON, 

Medical Nurse/Grievance Officer; SOPHIE SWIKA, Medical 

Nurse; KIM ZIMMERMAN, Medical Nurse, and all other 

parties et al., relevant to this instant civil action against 

them; JAMES PRICE, Superintendent (SCI Pittsburgh) 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Pennsylvania 

(D.C. Civil Action No. 97-cv-01264) 

District Judge: Honorable Donald E. Ziegler 

Argued September 11, 2000 

O R D E R 

At the direction of the Court it is hereby O R D E R E D 

that the Opinion of the Court in the above-entitled appeal 

is hereby amended to change the order of the concurring 

and dissenting opinions. The concurring and dissenting 

opinion of Judge Garth will follow the opinion of Judge 

Roth to correctly reflect the voting in the decision. That 

opinion will be followed by the concurring and dissenting 

opinion of Judge Nygaard. This amendment of the opinion 

will not affect the date that the Court's judgment was 

entered. 
 For the Court, 

 /s/Marcia M. Waldron 

 Clerk 

Dated: July 24, 2001 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 

 2
#### Bruen CRAIG v. Elliott CARTER and Brookshire’s Grocery Company d/b/a Super One Foods.

No. 98-C-2698.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1998.

IN RE: Craig, Bruen; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Ouachita Monroe City Court Number 92CV02193; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Number 30625-CA.

Denied.

LEMMON, J. not on panel.
# C_2012194EN.01002201.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/22

---

Action brought on 11 April 2012 — Free v OHIM — Conradi + Kaiser (FreeLounge)

(Case T-161/12)

2012/C 194/37

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Free (Paris, France) (represented by: Y. Coursin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Conradi + Kaiser GmbH (Kleinmaischeid, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul in part the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 January 2012 in Case R 437/2011-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in part the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 January 2012 in Case R 437/2011-2;

| — | rule that the application for registration of the disputed mark should be rejected in its entirety on the basis of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; and |
| --- | --- |

—

rule that the application for registration of the disputed mark should be rejected in its entirety on the basis of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; and

| — | order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, both before the Court and before OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, both before the Court and before OHIM.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘FreeLounge’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 35 and 41 — application for registration No 8442832

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the French figurative mark No 99785839 ‘free LA LIBERTÉ N’A PAS DE PRIX’ for goods and services in Classes 9 and 38; the French word mark No 1734391 ‘FREE’ for services in Class 38; the company name ‘FREE’ used in the course of trade in France; the domain name ‘FREE.FR’ used in the course of trade

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the application for the Community trade mark

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the contested decision

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1259 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM181AD

777 - 55A0018, R1 --- 3/6/12 777 - 55A0018 --- 7/27/11 77 - 55A0018 IN 01 --- 10/6/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# National Guard answered the call for Hurricane Florence

By National Guard Bureau

                CHARLESTON, S.C.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the National Guard website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Links

National Hurricane Center

2018 Hurricane Response

Hurricane Florencedisaster assistancedisaster reliefdisaster responsedisaster supportfoodfuelwatergeneratorscots