alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Assessment of geothermal resources of the United States: 1978

By: L. J. Patrick Muffler**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir790

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The geothermal resource assessment presented in this Circular is a refinement and updating of USGS Circular 726. Nonproprietary information available in June 1978 is used to assess geothermal energy in the ground and, when possible, to evaluate the fraction that might be recovered at the surface. Five categories of geothermal energy are discussed: 

a. Conduction-dominated regimes 

b. Igneous-related geothermal systems 

c. High-temperature (>1500C) and intermediate-temperature (90°-150°C) hydrothermal convection systems 

d. Low-temperature (<900C) geothermal waters 

e. Geopressured-geothermal energy (both thermal energy and energy from dissolved methane). 

Assessment data are presented on three colored maps prepared in cooperation with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
(No. 54979.

#### S. Nathan & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 156514-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the •merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those -the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
No. 56758.

protest 68932-K (Los Angeles).

#### James Loudon & Co. for E. Morris Smith *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
# C_2012295EN.01001701.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/17

---

Action brought on 25 June 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

(Case C-307/12)

2012/C 295/28

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Hetsch, D. Düsterhaus, S. Petrova)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Bulgaria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by not adopting the legal or administrative provisions necessary in order to render national law compatible with Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, (1) or at least by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 40 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by not adopting the legal or administrative provisions necessary in order to render national law compatible with Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, (1) or at least by not notifying those provisions to the Commission, the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 40 of that directive;

1

| — | Order the Republic of Bulgaria, pursuant to Article 260(3) TFEU, to pay a penalty payment of EUR 15 200,80 per day, calculated from the day on which judgment is delivered in the present proceedings, on account of its failure to fulfil the obligation to notify the measures adopted in order to render its national law compatible with Directive 2008/98/EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Republic of Bulgaria, pursuant to Article 260(3) TFEU, to pay a penalty payment of EUR 15 200,80 per day, calculated from the day on which judgment is delivered in the present proceedings, on account of its failure to fulfil the obligation to notify the measures adopted in order to render its national law compatible with Directive 2008/98/EC;

| — | Order the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the adoption of measures to transpose the directive expired on 12 December 2010.

---

(1)  OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3.

1

---
PUBLIC LAW 115–208—JULY 24, 2018 132 STAT. 1537 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2673: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Mar. 5, considered and passed House. 

June 28, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–208 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 514 Broadway 

Street in Pekin, Illinois, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Jordan S. Bastean Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL JORDAN S. BASTEAN POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 514 Broadway Street in Pekin, Illinois, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Jordan S. Bastean 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Jordan S. Bastean Post Office’’. 

Approved July 24, 2018. 

July 24, 2018 

[H.R. 2673] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUB LAWS PDF
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# CBRN gear checkout process improves

By 2nd Lt. Daniel Rubio56th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

                LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Luke Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

CBRN56th Logistics Readiness Squadronprotective equipmentkitting
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Partnership improving parts supplies for mechanics

By Tim KurtzWarner Robins - Air Logistics Complex Operations Office

                ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE, Ga.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Robins Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Warner Robins Air Logistics ComplexIndustrial Prime Vendor programpartsaircraft partsAutocrib402nd Maintenance Support Squadron402nd Maintenance GroupDLA AviationDLA Aviation at Warner Robins
Promissory Note


PROMISSORY NOTE




Borrower:

Eternal Image of 28800 Orchard Lake Road MI 48334

Lender:

J. Scott Watkins



Principal Amount:

$35,000

1.

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Eternal Image promises to pay to J. Scott Watkins at such address as may be provided in writing to Eternal Image , the principal sum of thirty-five thousand ( $35,000.00 ) USD, with 2%  interest payable on the unpaid principal.

2.

This Note will be repaid with an initial down payment of $8,750, and then 12 consecutive monthly installments of $ 2,211.27 each on the 1st day of each month commencing the month following execution of this Note with the balance then owing under this Note being paid at the end of its term.

3.

At any time while not in default under this Note, Eternal Image may pay the outstanding balance then owing under this Note to J. Scott Watkins without further bonus or penalty.

4.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Note, if Eternal Image defaults in the performance of any obligation under this Note, then J. Scott Watkins may declare the principal amount owing and interest due under this Note at that time to be immediately due and payable.

5.

This Note will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Georgia.

6.

If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, it is the parties' intent that such provision be reduced in scope by the court only to the extent deemed necessary by that court to render the provision reasonable and enforceable and the remainder of the provisions of this Agreement will in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated as a result.

7.

All costs, expenses and expenditures including, and without limitation, the complete legal costs incurred by J. Scott Watkins in enforcing this Note as a result of any default by Eternal Image , will be added to the principal then outstanding and will immediately be paid by Eternal Image . 

8.

This Note will ensure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of Eternal Image and J. Scott Watkins. Eternal Image waives presentment for payment, notice of non-payment, protest and notice of protest.








9.

Monthly Payment Amount: $ 2,211.27

IN WITNESS WHEREOF Eternal Image has duly affixed his signature under seal on this 21st day of December, 2006.

												
	 	


SIGNED, SEALED, AND DELIVERED

this 21st day of December, 2006 in front of the person below who is over 18 years of age and not involved with the contents of this document or related to any of the parties in this document.



__________________________

(signature of witness)

WITNESS DETAILS:

Name:

_______________

Address:

_______________

 

_______________

	 	 

	


 




Clint Mytych

Eternal Image – Chief Executive Officer










 




James R Parliament

Eternal Image – Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014009EN.01002301.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2013 — Equinix (Germany) v OHIM — Acotel (ancotel.)

(Case T-443/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark ancotel. - Earlier Community figurative mark ACOTEL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2014/C 9/37

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Equinix (Germany) GmbH, formerly ancotel GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Truelsen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Acotel SpA (Rome, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 August 2012 (Case R 1895/2011-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Acotel SpA and ancotel GmbH, now Equinix (Germany) GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Equinix (Germany) GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Equinix (Germany) GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.

1

---
No. 74-5981.

#### Konjevic et vir *v.*Florida Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the quarterly  report of Cyber Defense  Systems,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, William C. Robinson,  CEO, CFO, Chairman and Principal  Executive,  Financial
and  Accounting  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                         CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.

                                         By: /s/ William C. Robinson
                                             -----------------------
                                             William C. Robinson
                                             CEO, CFO, Chairman and
                                             Principal Executive, Financial
                                             and Accounting Officer

                                                May 19, 2005
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v BILLIE S. O’NEAL, Hospitalman Third Class, U. S. Navy, Appellant

8 USCMA 733, 25 CMR 237

No. 10,994

Decided February 21, 1958

*Commander John P. Gibbons*was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Louis L. Milano*was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

We granted review to consider the sufficiency of the staff judge advocate’s post-trial advice to the general court-martial authority. The Government concedes error, and our examination of the record indicates that the concession is appropriate. The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for reference to a competent general court-martial authority for further proceedings in accordance with Articles 61, 64, and 65, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 861, 864, and 865. United States v Jenkins, 8 USCMA 274, 24 CMR 84; United States v Grice, 8 USCMA 166, 23 CMR 390.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Forrest P. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

Theforegoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liabilityunder this section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the ExchangeAct except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly incorporatedby reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated: June 15, 2006 |   | /s/Forrest P. Jordan    |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                      |   | Forrest P. Jordan       |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
# C_2015245EN.01000301.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Civile di Roma (Italy) lodged on 13 April 2015 — X v Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Case C-167/15)

(2015/C 245/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Civile di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X

Applicant:

Defendant: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Directive 2004/80/EC (1) (Article 12(2)) be interpreted as precluding national implementing legislation which refers, with regard to the payment of compensation chargeable to the State, to special legal provisions in favour of victims of crime, but does not grant to victims of ordinary violent crimes access to a substantive system of compensation of general scope and governs only procedural aspects, in cross-border cases, of access to that system? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Directive 2004/80/EC (1) (Article 12(2)) be interpreted as precluding national implementing legislation which refers, with regard to the payment of compensation chargeable to the State, to special legal provisions in favour of victims of crime, but does not grant to victims of ordinary violent crimes access to a substantive system of compensation of general scope and governs only procedural aspects, in cross-border cases, of access to that system?

1

| 2. | Must Directive 2004/80/EC (Article 12(2)) therefore be interpreted as requiring a substantive system of protection of general scope, provided by the State, or in any event laying down a minimum level of such protection and, if that is so, what are the criteria for determining that level? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must Directive 2004/80/EC (Article 12(2)) therefore be interpreted as requiring a substantive system of protection of general scope, provided by the State, or in any event laying down a minimum level of such protection and, if that is so, what are the criteria for determining that level?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims (OJ 2004 L 261, p. 15).

1

---