alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Southern California floods of January, 1916

By: Harry Deyoe McGlashanFred Charles Ebert

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp426

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2015228EN.01002502.xml

| 13.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/25

---

Order of the General Court of 8 May 2015 — United Kingdom v ECB

(Case T-45/12) (1)

1

(2015/C 228/31)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
#### Janis HYATT and Gary Hyatt v. Johy RAGGIO, M.D.

No. 99-CC-0040.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1999.

In re Louisiana Patient’s Comp. Fund;— Third Party(ies); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 95-6594; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW98-1852. '

Denied.

*642VICTORY, J., not on panel.

TRAYLOR and KNOLL, JJ., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.333-152165) pertaining to a registration to sell
2,641,032 shares of common stock by certain selling shareholders;(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-111245) pertaining to a registration to sell
4,517,604 shares of common stock by certain selling shareholders;(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-100157) pertaining to the 1996 Executive and
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, and certain outstanding stock options; and(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-128120) pertaining to the Executive
Nonqualified Excess Plan
   
 51
SCWC-21-0000348 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

DWIGHT J. VICENTE, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant/Appellant,

vs. HILO MEDICAL INVESTORS, LTD., Respondent/Employer-Appellee/Appellee, and AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY/AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee/Appellee, and JOHN MULLEN & COMPANY, INC., Respondent/Insurance Adjuster-Appellee/Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-21-0000348; CASE NO. AB 2015-259(H)(S);

DCD NO. 1-87-00882) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner Dwight J. Vicente’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on November 24, 2021, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, December 14, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-21-0000348 14-DEC-2021 08:55 AM Dkt. 7 ODAC
# C_2012319EN.01001003.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/10

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 4 September 2012 — Elitaliana v Eulex Kosovo

(Case T-213/12 R)

(Interim measures - Public contracts - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tender - Application for interim measures - Disregard of the procedural requirements - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 319/19

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Elitaliana SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: R. Colagrande, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Eulex Kosovo (Pristina, Republic of Kosovo) (represented by: G. Brosadola Pontotti, solicitor)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought, in essence, to suspend the execution of the Eulex Kosovo decision rejecting the tender that the applicant had submitted in the public contract award procedure ‘EuropeAid/131516/D/SER/XK — Helicopter Support to the EULEX Mission in Kosovo (PROC/272/11)’ and awarding that contract to another tenderer.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Wesley F. Whiting, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Fayber Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarter
-ly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  February 4, 2004


/s/ Wesley F. Whiting
-----------------------
Wesley F. Whiting,
Secretary & CFO
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of Shoreside Investments, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
M.  Karz,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



                                   By: /s/Robert  M..Karz
                                   -------------------------
                                   Robert  M.  Karz
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer
                                   May  15,  2003
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-24-00186-CR

JESUS RAMIREZROSALES, Appellant

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

On Appeal from the 396th District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1799933) 

August 1, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell 

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell 

 Justice Wade Birdwell
Exhibit 10.1


 


Titan
Machinery Inc. Fiscal 2009 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan


 


Each non-employee
director of Titan Machinery Inc. shall receive:


 


·      an annual retainer of
$20,000, payable quarterly (the chair of the audit committee shall receive an
additional $5,000 retainer);


 


·      an annual grant of shares of
restricted common stock equal to $20,000(1), based upon the fair market value
of the Company’s common stock on the last day of the prior fiscal year(2),
granted on the first day of the fiscal year for the prior fiscal year’s service;


 


·      a $1,000 cash fee per board
or committee meeting attended ($500 for teleconferences); and


 


·      reimbursement of reasonable
expenses incurred in connection with their services as directors.


 






(1) The restricted
stock grants shall have a one-year vesting period and each director shall be
required to hold such shares of restricted stock until such director is no
longer serving as a director of Titan Machinery Inc.


 


(2) The fair market
value of the Company’s common stock shall be equal to the closing price of the
Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq stock market on the date of determination,
or if such date is not a trading date on the Nasdaq stock market, the nearest
preceding trading date.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

A.W., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4148

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

 )

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 30, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Mark Hofstad, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Allison C. Heim,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

MORRIS, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc.
(the “small business issuer”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended February
29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Jim Place, Chief Financial Officer of the small business
issuer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s
knowledge and belief:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the small
      business issuer.











/s/
      Jim PlaceJim
      Place
              Chief
      Financial Officer







May 29,
2008
APHIS Factsheet

Biotechnology Regulatory Services July 2012

Questions 

and Answers: 

Monsanto’s HighYield Soybean 

(Event MON 87712)

 APHIS received a petition from Monsanto, in July 

2011, seeking a determination of nonregulated status 

for soybean MON 87712 developed to produce 

commercial soybean crops with increased yield. 

The yield increase in MON 87712 is achieved using 

the BBX32 gene that causes the plant to express the 

protein that alters the plant’s physiology; allowing it to 

make more efficient use of nutrients and sunlight.

Q: What would be the principal use of soybean 

MON 87712?

A. It will be used to produce soybeans with increased 

yield. 

Q: What is BBX32?

A: BBX32 is a common protein in plants that 

regulates responses to light. BBX32 is introduced by 

genetic engineering in soybeans to allow for more 

efficient use of nutrients and sunlight.

Q: Is soybean MON 87712 intended for human 

consumption?

A: Yes. Monsanto submitted to FDA a food and feed 

safety and nutritional assessment for event MON 

87712. It is currently under review at FDA.

Q: Has soybean MON 87712 been field tested in 

the U.S.?

A: Yes, it has been field tested since 2009 in the 

major soybean growing regions of the United States. 

All field tests have been conducted under permits, 

including strict movement controls, granted by USDA 

APHIS.

Q: Why is APHIS making this petition available to 

the public?

A: This first comment period provides the public an 

opportunity to review the petition for nonregulated 

status and provide input that will be considered by 

APHIS as it develops its ensuing environmental 

assessment and plant pest risk assessment. APHIS 

will accept written comments regarding the petition for 

a determination of nonregulated status from interested 

or affected persons for a period of 60 days from the 

date of the Agency’s notice in the Federal Register. 

Q: What is the next step following the comment 

period?

A: After the comment period closes, APHIS will 

carefully consider all written comments received 

during the comment period and any other relevant 

information; any substantive issues identified by 

APHIS based on our review of the petition and 

our evaluation and analysis of comments will be 

considered in the development of the Agency’s 

environmental assessment and plant pest risk 

assessment. 

Q: Under APHIS’ process, what does the Agency 

do after it prepares its draft assessments?

A: After the Agency prepares these documents, it 

makes them publicly available, providing a second 

30-day opportunity for public input. The Agency then 

carefully reviews comments before any determination 

becomes final. 

For more details on the petition process, go to:

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/pet_proc_

imp_info.shtml 

United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service • Safeguarding American Agriculture

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
#### In re Claim for Medical Negligence on Behalf of Candace Jenny DAUZAT. Jeanette Dodge DAUZAT, et al. v. LOUISIANA PATIENT’S COMPENSATION FUND, et al.

No. 98-C-0907.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 8, 1998.

In re Dauzat, Candace Jenny; Dauzat, Jeanette Dodge;-Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “I”, Nos. 96-20577, 89-515; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Nos. 97-CA-1318, 97CA-1319.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Force Support debuts new field kitchen and rations

By Tech Sgt. Carlos J. Treviño433rd Airlift Wing Public Affairs

                JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 433rd Airlift Wing website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

4th Air Force433rd Airlift Wing433rd Force Support Squadronmeals ready to eatMREunitized group rationsUGRSingle Pallet Expeditionary KitchenSubsistencefood
I Publle Nmce ' ' 20H Proposed Ruf* 

Air QuaIltY Amblent Ai lurds ' . 

. 

I 

45CSR14 - Perrn~ts for 

Construct~on and Malor 

Modifrcatron of Mator ftaIlonarv Sources for the 

Preventton of Signiilcant Deter,iyaflon ofAlr.Quoli- 

*Y,T.b.g . . 

. '&c$k<6 - Standards of 

Performance for New 

Statlonan SWi-feS 

The West Ytrrrahra Dlviwon of Alt Quality has scheduled a public hear- Ing on Jutvd& 20t3 for ds 2014 bmpdsed Ieg~~Iattve mle%,$hich Will rake ptace' Iv~;~on ater,vtronmlbPP~ectro- n's Charleston hbudsuarLEML ADVERnSEPEWT Cumtry 1611 and Maior Modlf~&rr f Maier 5fa- ttonow . SOLI!&S Wh~ch . Cause oc Cmtrrbute tO ., Nonaftainmenf Areas 
BILLED 

601 57TH STREET SE 

TO CHARLESTON W 25304 USA 

Please return this portion with your payment. AMOUNT PAID: 

Make checks payable to: Charleston Newspapers 

CHARLESTON NEWSPAPERS 

P.O. Box 2993 

Charleston, West Virginia 25330 

Billing 348-4898 

classified 348-4848 

1-IO@WVA-NEWS LegaI pricing is based upon 63 words per column inch. 

PEIN 55-0676079 Each successive insertion is discounted by 25% of the first insertion rate. 

State of West Virginia, 

I, 

THE CHARLESTON GAZETTE, 

do solemn1 swear that the le a1 notice of: 

PUBLIC~~PICE~ OIIP%OPOSED 

was duly published in said newspaper(s) at the stated price for the respective newspap 

Subscribed and sworn to before me this
No. 54336.

#### Burroughs Wellcome & Co., Inc., and Lo Curto & Funk *v.*United States,

protests 64040-K and 64902-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.