alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015363EN.01002701.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2015 — Nestlé Unternehmungen Deutschland v OHIM — Lotte (Representation of a koala bear)

(Case T-483/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark representing koala bears - Earlier national three-dimensional mark KOALA-BÄREN and earlier national figurative mark KOALA - Genuine use of the mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 363/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nestlé Unternehmungen Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz and P. Blumenthal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Lotte Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: M. Knitter and H. Bickel, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2012 (Case R 2103/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Nestlé Schöller GmbH & Co. KG and Lotte Co. Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 September 2012 (Case R 2103/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Nestlé Schöller GmbH & Co. KG and Lotte Co. Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 September 2012 (Case R 2103/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Nestlé Schöller GmbH & Co. KG and Lotte Co. Ltd;

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Nestlé Unternehmungen Deutschland GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Nestlé Unternehmungen Deutschland GmbH;

| 3. | Orders Lotte Co. Ltd to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Lotte Co. Ltd to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
#### Border Brokerage Co. *v.*United States

No. 7726.

Entry No. 366-E.

(Decided August 4, 1949)

*Lawrence, Tuttle & Harper (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

It is hereby stipulated as follows between counsel for plaintiff (s) and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, concerning the merchandise referred to herein:

> 1) That the involved issues in this appeal are the same in all material respects as in Tower v. US, RD 7624, on Canadian sales tax, and that the record in'that case may be incorporated herein.

> 2) That the appraised value of said merchandise, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> 3) That this case may be deemed to be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Technologies
Group, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2011 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
the undersigned, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: June 20, 2011                        /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Alex Stelmak
                                           Chief Executive Officer,
                                           Chairman of the Board and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Saiph Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Eric C. Bronk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.


/s/ Eric C.  Bronk
Eric C. Bronk
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 14, 2002
# C_2014102EN.01004501.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/45

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 February 2014 — García Dominguez v Commission

(Case F-155/12) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Competition - Competition notice EPSO/AD/215/11 - Not included in the reserve list - Reasons for decision rejecting an application - Principle of equal treatment - Conflict of interests))

2014/C 102/66

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luis García Dominguez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to include the applicant in the reserve list for competition EPSO/AD/215/11.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Mr García Dominguez shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr García Dominguez shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013, p. 26.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6747

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CURTIS WOODROW JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-75-A, CA-96-158-AM)

Submitted: February 27, 1997 Decided: March 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Woodrow Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Joseph Hulkower,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Appellant's motion to proceed on the original record, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-93-75-A; CA96-158-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Tricia A. Willis, as Chief Financial Officer of Huile' Oil & Gas, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
that

     (1) the Company's Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
applicable; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: May 13, 2003                         /s/ TRICIA A. WILLIS
                                            __________________________
                                            Tricia A. Willis
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            Huile' Oil & Gas, Inc.
#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6520.

Entry No. 744289.

Invoice dated London, England, February 8, 1946.

Certified February 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 15, 1946.

(Decided November 15, 1946)

*Marlow & Hines*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

In the appeal listed above counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence herein.

Upon the agreed facts and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the values found by the appraiser, less any additions made by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EX-10.20.2



 





Exhibit 10.20.2









Cascal BV.

6.1.24, Strawinskylaan 3105

‘1077 ZX

Amsterdam

The Netherlands




			
	 	 	 
	Attention: Chief Commercial Officer
	 	19 November 2007






Dear Sirs




Cascal B.V.




US$30,000,000 Facility Agreement dated 15 June 2007 as amended and restated by an

Amendment and Restatement Agreement dated 2 November 2007 (the “Agreement”) -

Amendment Letter





	1.	 	We refer to the above Agreement. Terms defined and references construed in the Agreement
have the same meaning and construction in this letter.
	 
	2.	 	For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged, we
agree to amend clause 13.1 (Commitment fee) of the Agreement by deleting the reference to
“the Margin applicable on such day multiplied by 0.30 per cent.” and replacing it with “30%
of the applicable Margin on such day”.
	 
	3.	 	By countersigning this letter, you acknowledge and agree to all amendments set out in
this letter.
	 
	4.	 	In accordance with Clause 40.1 (b) of the Agreement, the waivers are effective only in
the instance and for the purpose for which they are given.
	 
	5.	 	This letter may be executed in any number of counterparts, and this has the same effect
as if the signatures on the counterparts were on a single copy of the letter.
	 
	6.	 	This letter shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English law.






HSBC Bank plc

Corporate, Investment Banking and Markets

Project and Export Finance

Level 17, 8 Canada Square, London EI4 5HQ




Registered in England number 14259. Registered Office: 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ

Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.




 









 










/s/ signed

For and behalf of HSBC BANK PLC




 









 










Acknowledged and agreed:




/s/ David Sayers

For and on behalf of Cascal B.V.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of EarthFirst Technologies, Incorporated (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge and belief, that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 10-KSB) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2007 |  | /s/ John D. Stanton                  
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and President

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
No. 95-9341.

#### Hogan *v.*McDaniel, Warden.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor and Justice Ginsburg would grant certiorari.
<TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1
CALCULATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES RATIO SUCCESSOR COMPANY

<CAPTION>
Excluding the results of the generation business

                                             Nine Months
                                                   Ended       Year ended
                                             December 31        March 31
                                                    1999      1999     1998
                                             (POUNDS)  $   (POUNDS)(POUNDS)
                                                  (Amounts in millions)
Earnings
<S>                                             <C>    <C>      <C>     <C>
Pretax income from continuing operations         47     76       62       5
Adjustments to include distributed income
  of less than 50% owned persons                  -      -       -        -
Add: Amortization charge on capitalized
  interest                                        -      -       -        -
Less: Interest capitalized in the period          -      -       -        -
Total earnings before fixed charges              47     76      62        5
Fixed charges
Interest expense                                 87    140     126      117
Interest capitalized                              -      -       -        -
Total fixed charges                              87    140     126      117
Total earnings and fixed charges                134    216     188      122
Ratio of earnings/fixed charges                 1.5    1.5     1.4      1.0



Including the results of the generation business
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Nine Months
                                                   Ended       Year ended
                                             December 31        March 31
                                                    1999      1999     1998
                                            (POUNDS)    $  (POUNDS)(POUNDS)
                                                  (Amounts in millions)
Earnings
<S>                                           <C>      <C>     <C>    <C>
Pretax income from operations                  47       76      68     16
Adjustments to include distributed income
  of less than 50% owned persons                -        -       -      -
Add: Amortization charge on capitalized
  interest                                      -        -       -      1
Less: Interest capitalized in the period        -        -       -      -
Total earnings before fixed charges            47       76      68     17
Fixed charges
Interest expense                               87      140     129    121
Interest capitalized                            -        -       -      -
Total fixed charges                            87      140     129    121
Total earnings and fixed charges              134      216     197    138
Ratio of earnings/fixed charges               1.5      1.5     1.5    1.1

</TABLE>
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Army testing more effective ghillie suits

By David VergunArmy News Service

                FORT BELVOIR, Va.   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine CommandArmy Research LaboratoryFlame Resistant Combat UniformImproved Ghillie SystemFlame Resistant Ghillie Systemghillie suitSoldier Clothing and Individual Equipmentclothingtextilesclothing and textiles
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1740 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1740

 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
reauthorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 19, 2011

   Mr. Cardin (for himself, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Warner, Mr. Webb, Mr. 
 Carper, and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
reauthorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 
Watertrails Network Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 502(c) of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 (16 
U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 105-312) is amended by striking ``fiscal 
years'' and all that follows through the period at the end and 
inserting ``fiscal years 2012 through 2016.''.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 9649)

#### Airport Clearance Service *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 468719; 464485.

(Decided March 30, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Dowh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeals for a reappraisement were called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

*626An examination of the official records discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Date: February 10, 2014

California Environmental Protection Agency

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Enclosure A

Rules that were Adopted, Amended, or Rescinded by the Following

Air Pollution Control and Air Quality Management Districts

and are Submitted as Revisions to the

State of California Implementation Plan for Achieving

and Maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards

District

Rule

Number

Date Adopted 

or 

Amended

Title

Imperial County 

APCD

101 10/22/13 Definitions (amended)

Imperial County 

APCD

206 10/22/13 Processing Applications 

(amended)

Imperial County 

APCD

400.3 10/22/13 Internal Combustion 

Engines(s) (adopted)

Imperial County 

APCD

400.4 10/22/13 Emissions of Oxides of 

Nitrogen from Wallboard Kilns 

(adopted)