alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# s 10-150508-007 

# San Mateo County Central Labor Council AFL-CIO • Organizing for justic e in Our Community www. s anmateolaborcouncil.org April 

### 28, 2015
The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary of Transportation US Department of Transportation 

### 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 

### 20590 Dear Secretary Foxx: As the head of the San Mateo County Central Labor Council , I represent 

### 110 affiliated local unions and over 

### 70,000 working member families. I have spent my career working to protect jobs and benefits for our members and advocating for policies that are employee-friendly. This is why I'm writing you about an issue that poses a direct threat to the jobs of many CLC members- the unfair competitive practices of some foreign airlines. As you're aware, Gulf state carriers such as Qatar Airways , Etihad A i rways and Emirates Airline
. receive massive subsidies and other unfair benefits from their governments, .to the tune of $42 billion, allowing them to offer fares that are far below those of their competitors. The result is that American carriers are losing business and revenue to these subsidized airlines: Less busines s means fewer jobs. The CLC has many members who work at San Francisco International Airport , all of whom r e ly on these jobs to support their famili e s and contribute to the local economy. Th e se employ e e :; a re not s ub s idized by the g ov ernm e nt or an y on e e lse **they ~**  work hard every d"ay for their paychecks. I t ls simpiy il ot fair that du e to thes
.e unfair**tompet t'iv~**  pra'ct :ces -w hitl v a r e in · •Jio l at i o n of e · )(din g Open Skies policythe se hard working Americans could lose their jobs. 

### I" UI ·ge VO L.:**n** con6Uitations .W.i.th · Qatar
. and
. the United Arab Emirates abo
. ut this · i ss ue · and a request a fr e eze on' new .capacity from' the. Gulf carrier s to the 

# u.s. v.;hile the consultations go forward. Workers from the Ba y Area and across the n2tion are co unting on you to stand up- for them. Sincerely,

Executive- Secr e tary Treasurer



# . . ope iu 3 AFL-C / 0 1 7 4

1 1 53 Ch ess Dri ve, Su ite 200 • Fos te r C ity, Ca liforn i a 94404 • Ph one: (650) 572

- 8848 • Fax: (65 0 ) 572-24 8 1

## San Mateo County Central Labor Council Afl·C IO a Orga n izing for J uJU« In Our Community
11 53 C h ess Driv e, Suit e 200 Fos te r City, Ca lif o rnia 94404



# s 10-150508-007**s..~\N** 

### ;::.**~:;,.~** j\i("J**S.(~( s** **CA~O**



### The Honorable Anthony R. 

### Foxx Secretary of Transportation US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590
No. 74-5942.

#### Brown *v.*Estelle, Corrections Director.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.
##### 



O2Diesel Corporation
(A Development Stage Company)
March 31, 2005  EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Alan Rae, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of O2Diesel
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    [Omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (September 5, 2003).]  c)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 16, 2005
    
    By: /s/ Alan RaeName: Alan RaeTitle: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 46426.

#### Protests 968601-G, etc., of Leon F. Kaufman, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items in question consist of dogskins, undressed, the same as those the subject of *Brachman*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389) the protests were sustained as to those items.
# C_2013079EN.01000303.xml

| 16.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Gálóczhi-Tömösváry Róbert v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal

(Case C-490/12)

2013/C 79/06

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gálóczhi-Tömösváry Róbert

Applicant:

Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that that provision is intended to guarantee the possibility of a legal remedy only for unlawful and unjustified dismissal? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that that provision is intended to guarantee the possibility of a legal remedy only for unlawful and unjustified dismissal?

| 2. | Does that provision mean that an employer is bound to provide the employee with reasons in writing on dismissal and the dismissal will then not be unjustified? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does that provision mean that an employer is bound to provide the employee with reasons in writing on dismissal and the dismissal will then not be unjustified?

| 3. | Does failure to communicate reasons in itself make the measure unlawful or may the employer state reasons subsequently in the course of any employment litigation? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does failure to communicate reasons in itself make the measure unlawful or may the employer state reasons subsequently in the course of any employment litigation?

---
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 Nos. 333-30976, 333-47101, 33-56615 and 333-56675 and Form S-3 No.
333-84461, of U.S. Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our report dated
January 14, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of U.S. Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2001, filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York

January 14, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1722 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1722

          To improve early education, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2011

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To improve early education, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Early Learning Proficiency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. UPDATING TITLE I GUIDANCE FOR PRESCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
each State that receives funds under the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.) shall issue guidance to 
local educational agencies regarding allowable uses of funds under part 
A of title I of such Act (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.) to serve preschool-
aged children.

SEC. 3. PREKINDERGARTEN LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION PROGRAMS.

    Section 3115(d)(4) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 6825(d)(4)) is amended by striking ``elementary 
school'' and inserting ``prekindergarten, elementary school,''.

SEC. 4. GUIDANCE ON USE OF TITLE III FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall issue guidance 
to local educational agencies on the use of funds under title III of 
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6801 et 
seq.) for prekindergarten programs.
    (b) Content of Guidance.--The guidance under subsection (a) shall 
promote the use by local educational agencies of funds under part B of 
title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 6891 et seq.) for early childhood professional development 
systems, which systems have policies and resources that are integrated 
across sectors, including Head Start programs, Early Head Start 
programs, center-based child care programs, family child care programs, 
and State or locally funded prekindergarten and early intervention 
programs.
                                 <all>
```
No. 54356.

#### Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 846091-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Bak hop, lotus nuts, sui sit, yuk chuk, wai san, sar sum, lo hon qua, mok qua, and yuen yuk the same as that passed upon in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs; (2) wai san, sliced; yuk juk, sliced; and sar sum, sliced, the same as that the subject of *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States, supra,*were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as drugs, advanced; and (3) merchandise similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 29022 was held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 775 as vegetables, prepared or preserved.
# C_2013055EN.01002602.xml

| 23.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/26

---

Action brought on 13 December 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-151/12)

2013/C 55/45

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision refusing the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) refusing the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance in accordance with Article 4 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) refusing the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance in accordance with Article 4 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations;

| — | to the extent necessary, annul the decision rejecting his complaint of 31 August 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

to the extent necessary, annul the decision rejecting his complaint of 31 August 2012;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 20202

Summary Calendar

NELSON ONYINYECHI,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

B. A. RIDINGS; J. KAISER BAUM; CITY OF PASADENA; STEPHANIE DE

LA ROSA; BAYSHORE MEDICAL CENTER, INCORPORATED; LEANN

PATTERSON,

Defendants

- Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

USDC N o. 4:18

- CV

- 1294

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges

.

PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. See Fifth Cir. R. 47.6.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH

C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

December 5, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk Case: 19-20202 Document: 00515224920 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/05/2019
# C_2012373EN.01001305.xml

| 1.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/13

---

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2012 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-260/12) (1)

1

2012/C 373/26

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 250, 18.8.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

SCHOOL SPECIALTY, INC.

SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

FISCAL YEARS ENDED APRIL 29, 2006, APRIL 28, 2007 AND APRIL 26, 2008



|                                |  |                |  |                              |  |                             |  |                         |        |  |            |        |  |                        |  |               
|------------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------ |  | ---------- | ------ |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------
|Description                     |  | Date           |  | Balance atBeginning ofPeriod |  | Charged toCosts andExpenses |  | Charged toOtherAccounts |        |  | Deductions |        |  | Balance atEnd ofPeriod |  | Date          
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  | April 30, 2005 |  | 4,065,000                    |  | 1,243,000                   |  | 583,000                 | (a)    |  | (2,011,000 | )  (b) |  | 3,880,000              |  | April 29, 2006
|                                |  | April 29, 2006 |  | 3,880,000                    |  | 1,270,000                   |  |                        |        |  | (349,000   | )      |  | 4,801,000              |  | April 28, 2007
|                                |  | April 28, 2007 |  | 4,801,000                    |  | 1,101,000                   |  | (926,000                | )  (c) |  | (741,000   | )      |  | 4,235,000              |  | April 26, 2008
|                                |  |                |  |                              |  |                             | 
|Restructuring reserve           |  | April 30, 2005 |  |                             |  | 4,002,000                   |  |                        |        |  | (1,673,000 | )      |  | 2,329,000              |  | April 29, 2006
|                                |  | April 29, 2006 |  | 2,329,000                    |  | 590,000                     |  |                        |        |  | (2,694,000 | )      |  | 225,000                |  | April 28, 2007
|                                |  | April 28, 2007 |  | 225,000                      |  |                            |  |                        |        |  | (225,000   | )      |  |                       |  | April 28, 2008



|(a) | Allowance for doubtful accounts acquired in purchase acquisitions.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) | Represents write-offs of uncollectable accounts receivable offset by recoveries of previously written-off accounts receivable.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(c) | Represents the allowance for doubtful accounts reduced as a result of the disposal of the School Specialty Media business unit.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PUBLIC LAW 115–206—JULY 23, 2018 132 STAT. 1535 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2292 (S. 734): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–174 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 115–83 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources) accompanying S. 734. 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): June 12, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): June 28, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–206 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To extend a project of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission involving the 

Cannonsville Dam. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT INVOLVING 

CANNONSVILLE DAM. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period specified 

in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

project numbered 13287, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at 

the request of the licensee for the project, and after reasonable 

notice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 

interest requirements of that section and the procedures of the 

Commission under that section, extend the time period during 

which the licensee is required to commence construction of the 

project for up to 4 consecutive 2-year periods after the required 

date of the commencement of construction described in Article 301 

of the license. 

(b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—If the required date of the commencement 

of construction described in subsection (a) has expired prior 

to the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission may 

reinstate the license effective as of that date of expiration. 

(2) EXTENSION.—If the Commission reinstates the license 

under paragraph (1), the first extension authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of that expiration. 

Approved July 23, 2018. 

Effective dates. 

July 23, 2018 

[H.R. 2292]
No. 74-5934.

#### Carpio *v.*Tucson High School District No. 1 of Pima County et al.

Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended  Quarterly Report of Infinity Capital Group, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Gregory H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC section  1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: September 20, 2006


/s/Gregory H. Laborde
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer and President


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
---

PACIFIC RIM MINING CORP.(the Company)

LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES AND JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION as of JULY 22, 2013

Name
    Jurisdiction of incorporation or
      organization
    Percent of voting shares owned by the
      CompanyPac Rim Cayman LLC
    Nevada, USA
    100% directly ownedDayton Mining (U.S.) Inc.
    Nevada, USA
    100% directly ownedPacific Rim Exploration Inc.
    Nevada, USA
    100% indirectly owned through Pac Rim
      Cayman LLCPacific Rim El Salvador S.A. de C.V.
    El Salvador
    100% indirectly owned through Pac Rim
      Cayman LLCDorado Exploraciones S.A. de C.V.
    El Salvador
    100% indirectly owned through Pac Rim
      Cayman LLC


---