alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Amended

(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Donald B. Cohen, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Quantum Group, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2007;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.





Date: March 26, 2007



/s/Donald B. CohenDonald B. Cohen

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1
  
  CERTIFICATE
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
  CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
  
  The
undersigned, Ronald J. Mittelstaedt and Worthing F. Jackman, being the duly
elected and acting Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of Waste Connections, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual
report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
  Date:
      February 11, 2008
                
                By:
                /s/ Ronald J.
      MittelstaedtRonald J.
      MittelstaedtChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      February 11, 2008
                
                By:
                /s/ Worthing F.
      JackmanWorthing F.
      JackmanExecutive
      Vice President and Chief
                  Financial
      Officer
# C_2014129EN.01002002.xml

| 28.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2014 — Heinrich v OHIM — Commission (European Network Rapid Manufacturing)

(Case T-430/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark European Network Rapid Manufacturing - Absolute ground for refusal - Imitation of the emblem of an international intergovernmental organisation - Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 6b of the Paris Convention))

(2014/C 129/26)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Heinrich Beteiligungs GmbH (Witten, Germany) (represented by: A. Theis, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: European Commission

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 July 2012 (Case R 793/2011-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between the European Commission and Heinrich Beteiligungs GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Heinrich Beteiligungs GmbH to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Heinrich Beteiligungs GmbH to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  
  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.

---
# C_2012379EN.01001401.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), lodged on 14 September 2012 — Wikom Elektrik GmbH v VG Media Gesellschaft zur Verwertung der Urheber- und Leistungsschutzrechte mbH

(Case C-416/12)

2012/C 379/23

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimant: Wikom Elektrik GmbH

Claimant:

Defendant: VG Media Gesellschaft zur Verwertung der Urheber- und Leistungsschutzrechte mbH

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the concept of communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC (1) include the rebroadcasting, by wire, of a broadcast work in the case where the original broadcast can also be received by wireless means in the catchment area, the work is rebroadcast to the owners of reception equipment who receive the broadcast personally or within their own private or family circles, and the rebroadcasting is carried out for profit-making purposes by a broadcasting organisation other than the original one?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10).

1

---
**Exhibit 21.1**

**EXHIBIT 21.1 PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

Alcor Chemie Vertriebs GmbH(Switzerland) 

Innospec Active Chemicals LLC (USA) 

Innospec Deutschland GmbH (Germany) 

Innospec Developments Limited (U.K.) 

Innospec Environmental Limited (U.K.) 

InnospecFinance Limited (U.K.) 

Innospec France SA (France) 

Innospec Fuel Specialties LLC (USA) 

Innospec Holdings Limited (U.K.) 

Innospec International Limited (U.K.) 

InnospecLeuna GmbH (Germany) 

Innospec Limited (U.K.) 

Innospec Trading Limited (U.K.) 

Innospec Widnes Limited (U.K.) 

OBOAdler Company Limited (U.K.) 

Societa Italiana Additivi Per Carburanti S.r.l. (Italy)
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2003


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, each of the undersigned officers of Iroquois Gas
Transmission System, L.P., a limited partnership organized under the laws of
the State of Delaware (the "Partnership"), does hereby certify that, to the
best of such officer's knowledge:


     1.   The accompanying Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form
          10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report")
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Partnership.



                                          /s/ E.J. Holm
                                          ---------------------------
                                          E. J. Holm
                                          President
                                          May 23, 2005



                                          /s/ Paul Bailey
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Paul Bailey
                                          Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
                                          May 23, 2005
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Pacific Rim Mining
Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended April 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Thomas C. Shrake, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information
contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



July 24, 2009
    Thomas C. ShrakeThomas C. ShrakeChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Pacific Rim Mining Corp. and will be retained by
Pacific Rim Mining Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee

Subcommittee on Boarding and Alighting Meeting #7

December 18, 2014

1:00 – 3:00 Eastern

1.0 Introductions

2.0 Approval of the Agenda

3.0 Discussion Items

3.1 Report from UWE Rutenberg on TCRP Gap Safety project

3.2 From the last meeting - Is there an International Standard for lifts, or another safety 

related standard? 

3.3 Develop reasons and benefits/costs for guidelines that are changing – may need to 

reach out to manufacturers.

4.0 Identify potential research needs.

5.0 Discuss recommendations to the DOT.

6.0 Identify subcommittee members to write the report to the full committee.

Next meeting – January 29, 2015
#### Willie KING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 99-0455.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 7, 1999.

*607Willie King, pro se, petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Charmaine M. Millsaps, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Willie King seeks a belated appeal, contending that he did not receive a copy of the order which denied his motion for post-conviction relief until after the time had passed for filing a timely notice of appeal. Upon consideration of the documentation Mr. King has offered in support of his claim and the respondent’s assertion that it is unopposed, we grant the petition.

Accordingly, Willie King is hereby granted a belated appeal from the order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County dated November 17, 1998, which denied post-conviction relief in case number 96-599-CFA. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. *See*Fla.R.App. P. 9.140(j)(5)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

BARFIELD, C.J., KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Wickett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 
|-----------------
|February 14, 2003
|
Exhibit 32.1


                     WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada (the "Company")
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:   May 11, 2005
                                     /s/ Donald R. Mayer
                                     ____________________________________
                                     Donald R. Mayer
                                     Principal Executive Officer
                                     Principal Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Malcolm JACKSON, Appellant.

No. 72390.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 21, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 30, 1998.

Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 24, 1998.

Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Malcolm Jackson, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury found him guilty of attempted first degree robbery, RSMo section 564.011 (1994).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcript. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1601

DORA ADKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD; DANIEL G. STORCK, sued in his capacity as Chairman of the Fairfax County School Board, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00091-JCC-JFA)

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 16, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dora Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Marie Dennis, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dora Adkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action alleging claims under the Americans

with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adkins v. Fairfax County Sch. Bd. , No. 1:08-cv-00091-JCC-JFA (E.D. Va. May 15, 2008). We deny Adkins’ motions “to accelerate” as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
s 10-150508-007 

San Mateo County 

Central Labor Council 

AFL-CIO • Organizing for justice in Our Community 

www.sanmateolaborcouncil.org 

April 28, 2015 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx: 

As the head of the San Mateo County Central Labor Council, I represent 110 

affiliated local unions and over 70,000 working member families. I have spent my 

career working to protect jobs and benefits for our members and advocating for 

policies that are employee-friendly. This is why I'm writing you about an issue that 

poses a direct threat to the jobs of many CLC members- the unfair competitive 

practices of some foreign airlines. 

As you're aware, Gulf state carriers such as Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and 

Emirates Airline. receive massive subsidies and other unfair benefits from their 

governments, .to the tune of $42 billion, allowing them to offer fares that are far 

below those of their competitors. The result is that American carriers are losing 

business and revenue to these subsidized airlines: Less business means fewer jobs. 

The CLC has many members who work at San Francisco International Airport, all of 

whom rely on these jobs to support their families and contribute to the local 

economy. These employee:; are not subsidized by the government or anyone elsethey~ work hard every d"ay for their paychecks. It ls simpiy ilot fair that due to thes.e 

unfair tompet t'iv~ pra'ct:ces-whitlv are in· •Jiolat ion of e·)(ding Open Skies policythese hard working Americans could lose their jobs. 

I"UI·ge VO L.: n con6Uitations .W.i.th·Qatar.and.the United Arab Emirates abo.ut 

this·issue·and a request a freeze on' new.capacity from' the. Gulf carriers to the u.s. 

v.;hile the consultations go forward. Workers from the Bay Area and across the 

n2tion are counting on you to stand up-for them. 

Sincerely, 

Executive- Secretary Treasurer 

. . opeiu 3 AFL-C/0 174 

1153 Chess Drive, Suite 200 • Foster City, California 94404 • Phone: (650) 572-8848 • Fax: (650) 572-2481 
San Mateo County 

Central Labor Council Afl·CIO a Organizing for JuJU« In Our Community 

1153 Chess Drive, Suite 200 

Foster City, California 94404 

s 10-150508-007 

s..~\N ;::. ~:;,.~ j\i("J S.(~(s 

CA~O 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590
#### Glenda Jara, Appellant, v Initial Contract Services, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[699 NYS2d 411]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered April 15, 1998, which granted defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendant-respondent’s liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*107The record establishes that plaintiff was discharged from the corporate defendant’s employ because her employment was seasonal in nature, not because she refused to submit to the individual defendant’s unwanted sexual advances, and, accordingly, her claim of retaliatory discharge was properly dismissed. Nor can the corporate defendant be held liable for intentional infliction of emotional distress, there being no basis for finding that the individual defendant; a low-level supervisor, was acting within the scope of his employment when he engaged in the offensive conduct *(see, Dykes v McRoberts Protective Agency,*256 AD2d 2), or that the corporate defendant had knowledge of the-offensive conduct and ignored it *(see, Matter of Father Belle Community Ctr. v New York State Div. of Human Rights,*221 AD2d 44, 54, *lv denied*89 NY2d 809). Instead, the record demonstrates that the corporate defendant took immediate corrective action, which ultimately led to the individual defendant’s dismissal upon his plea of guilty to the charge of third-degree sexual abuse. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DPMAP Sessions for Supervisors and Managers

By Notasha FantDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The end of the performance appraisal cycle is quickly approaching.  To assist, DPMAP sessions for Supervisors and Managers will be offered as follows: 

 

**Michigan Room**

Mar  13 –  9-11 a.m. 

Mar 19 – 1 - 3 p.m.

Mar 27 – 9 -11 a.m. 

 

**Cardinal Room**

Mar 15– 9 - 11 a.m.

Mar 22– 1 - 3 p.m.

Mar 29 – 9 -11 a.m.

** **

**Session topics will include:**

- Narrative Statements

- Ratings of Record- Award Process

 

Questions?  Please feel free to email us at DPMAP Program Manager.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&Mperform and Reward L&MBuild Connections L&MCommand L&Detachments L&MLabor Management L&Mmanagement L&MLeadership L&MSupervisors L&MCouncils L&M