alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2

4.While the Department of Health would be a signatory for the AOC, would that then bind the Board of 

Water Supply and its customers to the AOC as well, and preclude the parties from seeking 

reimbursement for expenses that may be incurred: (1) to clean-up contaminated water and (2) to pursue 

alternatives to take the place of contaminated water that is deemed prohibitive to treat? If so, then we 

feel that the Board of Water Supply needs to be a party to the AOC discussions/development to 

represent the Oahu community's interests. In addition, federal reimbursement of expenses for 

clean-up and water source alternatives need to be required in the AOC. Responsibility for increased 

costs must be borne by the party responsible for causing the problem, and not by innocent Oahu citizens. 

Finally, we object to the short 30-day time period for your agency to receive comments on such a critical 

matter. As pointed out by the Board of Water Supply in their testimony dated June 18, 2015, not all information 

was made available until midway through the comment period. Therefore, we urge that an extension be 

granted, until July 31, 2015, to allow the Board of Water Supply and concerned citizens who are only now 

becoming aware of the issue to provide comments, and help reassure that this is a meaningful, transparent 

process. 

We respectfully ask that you consider our comments and recommendations. Thank you.
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Walter Thomas Price III, Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the general partner of Rogers
International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Walter Thomas Price IIIWalter Thomas Price IIIManaging MemberMay 17, 2004
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

April 22, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00157

- CV

Jim SCHMIDT individually and D/B/A The Goat Company and The Wildlife Ranch, Appellants

v.

Dr. Charles W. GRAHAM , DVM and Tyler Graham d/b/a, Hamil ton Commission Company,

Hamilton Commission Company LLC, and Kristen Mcfarlin., Appellees

From the 452nd District Court

, Mason County, Texas

Trial Court No. 185791 Stephen Ellis , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

T he clerk’s record and reporter’s record in this appeal were due on April 1 5, 202 2

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.1. The clerk’s record was timely filed. On April 18, 202 2

, the official court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record filed a notification of late record, stating that appellant has failed to (1) request preparation of the reporter’s record i n writing and (2) pay or make satisfactory arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3 ( b )

.

W e therefore ORDER appellant to file written proof in this court no later than ten (10) days after the date of this order showing t hat : (1) he has requested that the official court reporter prepare the reporter’s re cord in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6 ; and (2) either the cour t reporter’s fee for preparation of the reporter’s record ha s been paid or satisfactory payment arrangements have b een made, or appellant is en titled to appeal without paying the fee

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6

, 20.1(a); T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145

.
If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3

.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of April, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23.2


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-69951, No. 333-90635 and No. 333-39460) of our report dated
December 17, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
THINK New Ideas, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, included in
Answerthink, Inc.'s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 29,
2000, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2001
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE CHRISTOPH GESKES

______________________

2012

- 1390

______________________

Appeal from the United State s Patent and Trademark

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No.

7791173

.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ARK B. H ARRISON

, Venable, LLP, of Washington, DC,

for appellant. With him on the brief was M ICHAEL E.

H ALL

.

R AYMOND T. C HEN , Solicitor, United States Patent and

Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, for appellee.

With him on the brief were T HOMAS L. C ASAGRANDE and

C HRISTINA J. H IEBER , Associate Solicitors.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, P LAGER , and P ROST

, Circuit

Judges ).T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 19, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk
# C_2012174EN.01003102.xml

| 16.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/31

---

Action brought on 29 March 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-28/12)

2012/C 174/50

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the implied decision rejecting the applicant’s request, first, to remove a sentence from the medical report of 28 February 2008, second, to send the report thus amended to the doctor chosen by the applicant and, third, to remove in general from the file on the work-related injury any information relating the claim, which the applicant maintains is incorrect, that the powder with which the applicant came into contact was ultimately shown to be the white dust of a copy of a newspaper to which the applicant subscribed.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s claims set out in the request of 23 December 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision rejecting the applicant’s claims set out in the request of 23 December 2010;

| — | In so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting the complaint of 10 July 2011 against the decision rejecting the request of 23 December 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

In so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting the complaint of 10 July 2011 against the decision rejecting the request of 23 December 2010;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of the CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act


I, Clyde Harrison, the chief executive officer of Rogers International Raw
Materials Fund L.P. certify that (i) the Form 10Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rogers
International Raw Materials Fund L.P.

                               /s/ Clyde Harrison
                               ------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                  July 28, 2003

Exhibit 32.2 - Certification of the CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act

I, Richard Chambers, the chief financial officer of Rogers International Raw
Materials Fund L.P. certify that (i) the Form 10Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rogers
International Raw Materials Fund L.P.

                              /s/ Richard Chambers
                              --------------------
                             Chief Financial Officer
                                  July 28, 2003
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women in Radio: Illustrated by Biographical Sketches

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women in Radio: Illustrated by Biographical Sketches : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 222*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										May 1947,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5493,			accessed on August 30, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 25, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00441-CV 

FELTON LOVE AND PHILLIP MITCHELL, Appellants 

V. 

TANYA WATKINS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18233 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Nowell

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard 

dated April 17, 2019, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to 

remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated April 17, 2019, we informed appellant 

the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the 

docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further 

notice. By letter dated May 15, 2019, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed 

because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification 

of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation 

appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten days. We 
 –2– 

cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further 

notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or 

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 

190441F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/ 

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

FELTON LOVE AND PHILLIP 

MITCHELL, Appellants 

No. 05-19-00441-CV V. 

TANYA WATKINS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18233. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. 

Justices Molberg and Nowell participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee TANYA WATKINS recover her costs of this appeal from 

appellants FELTON LOVE AND PHILLIP MITCHELL. 

Judgment entered June 25, 2019
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135574 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135574 

 COA: 281163 

Saginaw CC: 06-027843-FH 

MICHAEL DONALD JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Upgrading the fuel structure in the AOR with experience and a strong work ethic

By Tech. Sgt. Louis Vega Jr. 386th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs

                SOUTHWEST ASIA  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Air Forces Central Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Air Force Central Command386th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness SquadronPOLpetroleumoillubricantsfuel bladderfuelaviation gasolineAVGAS
#### United States *v.*S. H. Kress & Co.

No. 6154.

Invoice dated Kobe, Japan, July 13, 1940.

Entered at New York, N. Y., August 16, 1940.

Entry No. 707956.

(Decided May 17, 1945)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement of 66 dozen tennis rackets has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation filed May 9, 1945, wherein 'the parties agree that the proper basis for ap-praisement of said merchandise is export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), and that such statutory value is 5.15 yen per dozen, packing included.

I therefore hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise in question to be as conceded by the parties, and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Order entered May 17, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01284-CV

KENNETH LEO BUHOLTZ, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-02337-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s May 15, 2019 “Clerk’s Record Request for Companion 

Case #006-01691-2018”, which is currently pending in the trial court. We DENY the motion.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send appellant a paper copy of the clerk’s record 

filed on December 3, 2018 and the supplemental clerk’s record filed on May 3, 2019. On the 

Court’s own motion, we extend the time for appellant’s brief on the merits to June 20, 2019.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, David H. Clarke, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; and  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report.December 28, 2005       /s/ David H. Clarke  David H. Clarke  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 55568.

#### J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 158861-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Case No. 6,983.

#### HYLTON v. BROWN.

[2 Wash. C. C. 165.] *1*

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

April Term, 1808.

*Aoiion*roa Mesne Profits — What Can be Recovered.

1. Action for mesne profits. The plaintiff can recover mesne profits, in the nature of damages, only from the time of the ouster laid in the declaration, having proved no title prior thereto.

[Cited in Beverly v. Burke, 9 Ga. 440.]

2. The value of the improvements made by the defendant, ought to be first set against the mesne profits prior to the actual ouster, and after the title of the plaintiff accrued; and the balance, only, can be properly deducted from the rents and profits to which the plaintiff is entitled.

[Cited in Thrasher v. Tyack, 15 Wis. 258.]

. Action to recover mesne profits, from the time of the ouster, laid in the declaration, to the time when possession was delivered under the habere facias possessionem, in 1806. The defendant gave evidence of improvements made on the land by the defendant, prior to the time of the demise laid, and of others subsequent to that period. Proof was given by the plaintiff of the value of the rents. The defendant held the possession some years anterior to the date of the demise.-

Mr. Lewis, for plaintiff,

read 3 Wells, 118.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the supervision of Richard Peters, Jr., Esq.]

WASHINGTON, Circuit Justice

(charging jury). This is a claim for mesne profits in the nature of damages, the value of which you are to estimate. Against this demand, the value of the improvements when the plaintiff received possession, is a fair offset. But the plaintiff, having proved no title, except under the recovery in ejectment, can recover damages only from the time of the demise laid in the declaration of ejectment. The value of the improvements ought first to be set against the mesne profits received by the defendant, prior to that period, and after the plaintiff’s title accrued: and the balance only, if any, may properly be deducted from the rents and profits to which the plaintiff was entitled subsequent to the demise.

Verdict for upwards of 2,000 dollars.