alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gerard MAYERS, Appellant, v. Evelyn MAYERS, Appellee.

No. 98-04114.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 28, 1999.

Susan J. Silverman, Sarasota, for Appellant.

Linda A. Lorrier, Bradenton, for Appel-lee.

BLUE,

Acting Chief Judge.

This was a bitter and very hotly contested custody battle. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and arguments on appeal. Although we may not have reached the same decision as the trial court in this case, under the appropriate standard of review we are required to affirm.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50968

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Daniel Manriquez-Nunez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-405-1

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Daniel Manriquez-Nunez appeals the sentence imposed after his

guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States, in violation of 

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). For the first time on appeal, he challenges the 

condition of his supervised release which states that, if the probation officer 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 23, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50968 Document: 00516368362 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2022
No. 21-50968

2

determines that Manriquez-Nunez presents a risk to another person, the 

probation officer may require Manriquez-Nunez to notify the person of that 

risk and may contact the person to confirm that notification occurred. He 

contends that the condition constitutes an impermissible delegation of 

judicial authority to the probation officer.

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance in which it contends that the sole issue on appeal is foreclosed by 

our recent decision in United States v. Mejia-Banegas, 32 F.4th 450 (5th Cir. 

2022). In Mejia-Banegas, we rejected the specific argument that ManriquezNunez raises regarding the risk-notification condition. See id. at 451-52. 

Accordingly, the Government is correct that summary affirmance is 

appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th 

Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time 

to file a brief is DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50968 Document: 00516368362 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/23/2022
----

|   |    |                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------|---------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | ● | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|   |    |                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | ● | information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |

|   |                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ James      P. DeBlasio           |
|   | James      P. DeBlasio                    |
|   | President      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ STEPHEN A. SNIDER
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ J. MICHAEL ANDERSON
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

IN RE: THE NAME CHANGE OF A.C.S.,

Appellant,

No. 4D17-962

[ July 12, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-DR-011634.

Erica N. Tschiggfrie, Jupiter, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

MAY, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Ex parte Eunice B. CRUTHIRDS. (Re Eunice B. Cruthirds v. SCI Alabama Funeral Services, Inc., d/b/a Roche-Belmany-Herrington Funeral Home, et al.).

1980060.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 4, 1999.

Vincent F. Kilborn III and M. Lloyd Roebuck of Kilborn & Roebuck, Mobile, for petitioner.

Edward A. Dean of Armbrecht, Jackson, DeMouy, Crowe, Holmes & Reeves, Mobile; and Andrew P. Campbell and David M. Loper of Campbell, Waller & McCal-lum, L.L.C., Birmingham, for respondents.

MADDOX, Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals, on July 24, 1998, affirmed the judgment of the trial court, without opinion. *Cruthirds v. SCI Alabama Funeral Services, Inc.*(No. 2970641) — So.2d - (Ala.Civ.App.1998) (table). We granted certiorari review. The legal issue presented in this ease is the same as that presented in *Ex parte Lacoste,*738 So.2d 889 (Ala.1998). The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded, based on our holding in that case.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HOOPER, C.J., and HOUSTON, KENNEDY, SEE, BROWN, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur.

LYONS, J., concurs specially.

COOK, J., concurs in the result.

LYONS, Justice

(concurring specially).

Although I agree that the judgment in this case should be reversed on the authority of this Court’s decision in *Ex parte Lacoste,*733 So.2d 889 (Ala.1998), I continue to adhere to my opinion that § 6-5-440, Ala.Code 1975, should not be applied beyond the limited circumstances discussed in my special writing in *Lacoste,*733 So.2d at 895 (Lyons, J., concurring in the judgment and concurring in part in the rationale, but dissenting from dictum).

COOK, Justice

(concurring in the result).

I agree that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is due to be reversed and the cause remanded. However, I do so on the basis of my special writing in *Ex parte Lacoste,*733 So.2d 889 (Ala.1998), in which I dissented from the application of the abatement statute, Ala.Code 1975, § 6-5-440, in class-action contexts.
Exhibit 15



Report of Independent Accountants



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Certified Services, Inc.



We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Certified Services, Inc. as of September 30, 2004, and the related condensed consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the for the nine and three month periods ended September 30, 2004, and 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Registrants management.



We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
and Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.



Based on our reviews, we are
not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.



/s/ Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman & CompanyBridgewater, New JerseyNovember 18, 2004
(Reap. Dec. 9879)

#### F. L. Kraemer & Co. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 42463-1/3, etc.

(Decided December 19, 1960)

*Use G. Coe*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in the Schedule *600hereto annexed and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the issues in *Paramount Import Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9697, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that the appraised values of the merchandise involved in the cases listed in the Schedule hereto annexed less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases is equal to the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Czechoslovakia in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, packed ready for delivery, and that the foreign values of such or similar merchandise were no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

In the incorporated case, it was held that the amount paid a foreign commissionaire for services rendered in connection with the purchase of merchandise in the foreign market and which amount did not inure to the benefit of the seller was a buying commission and, therefore, was not a part of the dutiable value of the merchandise.

On the agreed facts and following my cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Fac ID Facility Name Type Fuel MMBTU/hr

16000 Sacramento Packing Boiler Natural Gas 20.92 100lb/mmscf1440 hr/year 1.48 tpy 16002 Wilbur Packing Company Boiler Natural Gas 6.3 100lb/mmscf8760 hr/year 2.71 tpy 16004 Sunsweet Grower Boiler Natural Gas 71.542 100lb/mmscf3000 hr/year 10.52 tpy 16004 Sunsweet Grower Boiler Natural Gas 71.542 100lb/mmscf3000 hr/year 10.52 tpy 16009 Yuba Community College Boiler Natural Gas 13.5 100lb/mmscf4000 hr/year 2.65 tpy 16009 Yuba Community College Boiler Natural Gas 9 100lb/mmscf4000 hr/year 1.76 tpy 23002 Rideout Hospital Boiler Natural Gas 10.5 100lb/mmscf2920 hr/year 1.50 tpy 23002 Rideout Hospital Boiler Natural Gas 12.6 100lb/mmscf2920 hr/year 1.80 tpy 34015Valley View Packing CompanyBoiler Natural Gas 25.12 100lb/mmscf5760 hr/year 7.09 tpy

Fac ID Facility Name

16000 Sacramento Packing 25.17 ppmv 70 ppmv 1.27 tpy 0.20 tpy 16002 Wilbur Packing Company 54.9 ppmv 70 ppmv 2.34 tpy 0.37 tpy 16004 Sunsweet Grower 58.2 ppmv 70 ppmv 9.08 tpy 1.44 tpy 16004 Sunsweet Grower 58 ppmv 70 ppmv 9.08 tpy 1.44 tpy 16009 Yuba Community College 63.3 ppmv 70 ppmv 2.29 tpy 0.36 tpy 16009 Yuba Community College 52.4 ppmv 70 ppmv 1.52 tpy 0.24 tpy 23002 Rideout Hospital 35.5 ppmv 70 ppmv 1.30 tpy 0.21 tpy 23002 Rideout Hospital 32 ppmv 70 ppmv 1.56 tpy 0.25 tpy 34015Valley View Packing Company 55.3 ppmv 70 ppmv 6.12 tpy 0.97 tpy

Total Permitted Emissions Reduced: 5.47tons/year

Assumptions: Natural Gas HHV 1,020Btu/scf G-lb Conversion 453.59g/lb Emission rate in lb/MMBTU = Cd*Fd [20.9 / (20.9 - 3)]

Cd= Cppm * X / M Fd (conversion) 8710dscf/ MMBTU X for NOx 46.01lb NOx/lb mol M (conversion) 387dscf/ lb mol NOx measured on test NOx Emission Limits (Rule 3.21) Pre-Rule Potential To Emit

Post-Rule Potential To Emit Permitted Usage NOx Emission Factor AP-42 1.4.1 [7/1998]

Permitted Reduction
No. 49511.

#### Protest 73288-K of Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protest was sustained to this extent.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# New coveralls to make life more comfortable for fuel handlers

Army News Service

                FORT BELVOIR, Va.   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Soldier Clothing and Individual EquipmentU.S. Army Training and Doctrine Commandcoverallsclothingtextilesclothing and textiles
No. 96-1331.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 50765.

#### Protest 942274-G of Geo. E. Mallinson Import Co., Inc. (New York).

*352Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained as claimed.
Exhibit 12 (b)

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                        and preferred securities dividend
                          (in thousands, except ratios)

                                                                Twelve-month
                                                                period ended
                                                              December 31,1998
                                                              ----------------

Net income...................................................   $     53,432
Fixed Charges
      Audit Fees.............................................             30
      Trustee Fees...........................................            120
      Administrative Fees....................................             50
                                                                ------------
Total Fixed Charges..........................................            200
                                                                ------------
Earnings before fixed charges................................         53,632
                                                                ------------
Fixed charges, as above......................................            200
Preferred securities dividend................................         38,690
Fixed charges including preferred securities dividends.......         38,890
                                                                ------------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
and preferred securities dividend............................           1.38
                                                                ------------
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Stephen A. Snider, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. (the "registrant");

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: June 10, 2004 |  |  | /s/STEPHEN A. SNIDERName: Stephen A. Snider
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Process Safety Management
Depends on You!

¢ Know the hazards associated with mixing, separating
or storing process materials and chemicals. Participate
in Process Hazard Analyses and Incident Investigations.

¢ Make sure your equipment is working properly at all
times. Tell your supervisor immediately when it is not.

¢ Know how your process operates and what to do in
an emergency or a near miss.

Employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees.

OSHA’s role is to promote the safety and health of America’s working men and women by setting
and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and
encouraging continual improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information about
safety in your chemical processing plant, talk with your employer, or visit www.osha.gov.

® Occupational Safety
>) and Health Administration
U.S. Department of Labor

www.osha.gov

OSHA 3316-01-2009

AP Images/Matt Slocum
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Get gassed up

By Staff Sgt. Sergio A. Gamboa51st Fighter Wing Public Affairs

                OSAN AIR BASE, Republic of Korea   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Osan Air Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

51st Logistics Readiness SquadronOsan Air Basefuelbulk fuelbulk fuel storagefuel truck