alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 46304.

#### Protest 996861-G of Wendling Nathan Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that idle subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed under the provisions of section 601 (c) (6), Revenue Act of 1932, as amended, should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protest was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-78075, 333-61617, 333-42890 and 333-42976 of US LEC Corp. on Form S-8 of our
report dated February 24, 2003 (March 20, 2003 as to second paragraph in Note
13), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of US LEC Corp. for the year
ended December 31, 2002.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
March 31, 2003
# C_2013038EN.01001402.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance d’Orléans (France) lodged on 6 December 2012 — BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA and Facet SA v Guillaume Delmatti

(Case C-564/12)

2013/C 38/19

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal d’instance d’Orléans

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: BNP Paribas Personal Finance SA, Facet SA

Applicants:

Defendant: Guillaume Delmatti

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 22 of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers, (1) interpreted in the light of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (2) prohibit the existence and application of standard terms in credit agreements whereby the consumer acknowledges that the creditor’s obligations have been fulfilled? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 22 of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers, (1) interpreted in the light of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (2) prohibit the existence and application of standard terms in credit agreements whereby the consumer acknowledges that the creditor’s obligations have been fulfilled?

1

2

| 2. | Do the general principle of the effectiveness of Community law and Articles 22 and 23 of Directive 2008/48/EC preclude the creditor’s being able to establish proof of fulfilment of its pre-contractual and contractual obligations solely by means of the standard terms in credit agreements whereby the consumer acknowledges that those obligations have been fulfilled, without producing before the court the documents issued by the creditor and supplied to the borrower? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do the general principle of the effectiveness of Community law and Articles 22 and 23 of Directive 2008/48/EC preclude the creditor’s being able to establish proof of fulfilment of its pre-contractual and contractual obligations solely by means of the standard terms in credit agreements whereby the consumer acknowledges that those obligations have been fulfilled, without producing before the court the documents issued by the creditor and supplied to the borrower?

---

(1)  Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66).

1

(2)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

2

---
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the quarterly report of Caneum, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principalexecutive officer and principal financial officer of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
Date: November 15, 2004
/s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan
May 10, 1951

No. 55538.

Suit 4632.

#### Joseph Fischer as Liquidating Agent of Schmoll Fils Associated, Inc. *v.*United States.

-C. D. 1179 affirmed March 22, 1951. C. A. D. 452.
EXHIBIT 32.2














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jim Place, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






By:
/s/ Jim PlaceJim Place

Chief Financial Officer
DISMISS and Opinion Filed February 27, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00999-CV GENA M. CROW, Appellant V. NOSHI PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02584-A MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Smith, and Breedlove Opinion by Justice Breedlove Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue . After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record , we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and for appellant’s br ief to be filed by January 17, 2023. By postcard dated January 20, 2023, we inform ed appellant her br ief was overdue and directed her to file her brief within ten da ys. We cautioned appella nt that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date , appellant has not filed her brief or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding th e status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

220999F.P05 /Maricela Breedlove / MARICELA BREEDLOVE JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT GENA M. CROW, Appellant
No. 05-22-00999-CV V. NOSHI PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02584- A. Opinion delivered by Justice Breedlove. Justices Partida-Kipness and Smith participating. In accordance with this Court’s opini on of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered February 27, 2023
#### Edward C. KING, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Janet L. KING, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 98-2254.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 28, 1999.

Rehearing Denied July 1, 1999.

*543Steven G. Lavely, Bradenton, for Appellant/ Cross-Appellee.

John Z. Pare’ and Robert A. DuChemin, of DuChemin *&*Associates, Orlando, for Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.

HARRIS, J.

We affirm the court’s judgment in determining that the songs written by the husband prior to the marriage are not marital assets. We also affirm its decision not to require that the husband’s obligations be secured, if for no other reason, because it was not requested below.

However, we must reverse the child support, alimony and attorney’s fees award because the court failed to determine the husband’s income. On remand, the court should reconsider these awards after appropriately determining the husband’s income. If the court elects not to apply any resulting modification award retroactively to the date the petition was filed, then it should state its reasons for not doing so.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ, concur.
(Reap. Dec. 9670)

#### James G. Hiering *v.*United States

Entry No. 4065, etc.

(Decided April 19, 1960)

*MaeLeish, Spray, Price & Underwood*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doul),*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*660Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon a stipulation limiting the appeals to the items described on the invoices as No. 351 Pedals, inch axle. On the basis of the stipulated facts I find export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis of value of the said pedals, and that such value in each case is the invoiced unit value net, less nondutiable charges as noted on the invoices.

The said appeals for reappraisement having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, they are to that extent dismissed. Judgment will issue accordingly.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the first Amendment to the Annual Report of Seychelle
      Environmental Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
      year ending February 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim Place, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
      the
      undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or


15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all


material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of


the
      Company.














/s/
      Jim
      Place


------------------------------


Jim
      Place


Chief
      Financial Officer


July
      14,
      2006
Before the Third Division,

May 15, 1951

No. 55551.

#### General Shipping & Trading Co. and Westergaard Berg Johnsen Co. *v.*United States,

protests 92089-K and 891747-G (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent-should have been- made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the foreign substance covering the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# 2018 Command Open House Holiday Photos

DLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Pictures from the 2018 DLA Land and Maritime Open House holiday event in the Command Suite are now available at eWorkplace on SharePoint Online. 

The photos can be found at **Land and Maritime > DSCC images > 2018 Command Open House** or at https://go.usa.gov/xPhJh

*Please note that the links are CAC enabled.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCommand L&MSenior Leadership L&MMilitary L&MPeople & Culture L&MCulture L&MFortify the Culture L&MHoliday
# C_2013063EN.01000703.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Pordenone (Italy) lodged on 28 November 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Giorgio Fidenato

(Case C-542/12)

2013/C 63/13

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Pordenone

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Giorgio Fidenato

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the authorisation provided by Article 1(2) of Legislative Decree No 212 of 24 April 2001, within the meaning conferred on it by the national case-law, compatible with the rules in Directive 2001/18/EC (1) or does it conflict with those rules? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the authorisation provided by Article 1(2) of Legislative Decree No 212 of 24 April 2001, within the meaning conferred on it by the national case-law, compatible with the rules in Directive 2001/18/EC (1) or does it conflict with those rules?

1

| 2. | In particular, where the Member State makes the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) subject to authorisation specifically aimed at protecting the so-called principle of coexistence, is that specific authorisation necessary also for GMOs which are already listed in the common catalogue? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In particular, where the Member State makes the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) subject to authorisation specifically aimed at protecting the so-called principle of coexistence, is that specific authorisation necessary also for GMOs which are already listed in the common catalogue?

---

(1)  Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC (OJ 2001 L 106, p. 1).

1

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.6 09/10/2004 475605$50.00 CreditCard #010576Tracking ID: 777157Doc No: 475605-002
 FILED
SECRETARY OF STATE        SAM
REED SEPTEMBER 10, 2004 STATE OF WASHINGTON ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
TO THE
CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION
OF THE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES
OF
SERIES B CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
OF
O2DIESEL CORPORATION O2Diesel Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws
of the State of Washington (the Company), hereby submits these Articles of
Amendment pursuant to Section 23 B.01.240 of the Washington Business
Corporation Act (the WBCA) for the purpose of amending its Certificate of
Designation of the Rights and Preferences of Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock (the Certificate) filed in the Corporations Division of the Office of
the Secretary of State on March 12, 2004. Section IV. (d)(i) of the Certificate is hereby amended to read, in its
entirety, as follows: (d)(i) The Conversion Price for each share of Series B
Preferred Stock in effect on any Conversion Date shall be the lesser
of (a) three dollars and sixty five cents ($3.65) (the Fixed
Conversion Price) or (b) eighty percent (80%) of the lowest closing
bid price for the Common Stock in the ten (10) business days
preceding the date of conversion, but in no event less than twenty
seven and four tenths percent (27.4%) of the Fixed Conversion Price
(the Floating Conversion Price). For purposes of determining the
closing bid price on any day, reference shall be to the closing bid
price for a share of Common Stock on such date on the NASD OTC
Bulletin Board, as reported on Bloomberg, L.P. (or similar
organization or agency succeeding to its functions of reporting
prices). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the Chief Financial Officer
and Secretary of O2Diesel Corporation, hereby declares under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and correct this 2nd day of
September, 2004. O2Diesel CorporationBy.
    
    /s/ David L. KoontzDavid L. KoontzChief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### Louis BISSELL, Jr., on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

Docket 96-9137.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued April 14, 1997.

Decided Sept. 29, 1998.

Roger W. Kirby, Kaufman, Malchman, Kirby & Squire, New York City (Ira M. Press, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Henry F. Minnerop, Brown & Wood, New York City (Cathleen M. Tiernan, Laurel J. Southworth, Daniel A. McLaughlin, of counsel), for Defendants-Appellees.

Christopher Paik, Office of Chief Litigation Counsel, Securities & Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Securities & Exchange Commission.

Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, FEINBERG, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

RALPH K. WINTER, Chief Judge:

Louis Bissell, Jr. appeals from Judge Schwartz’s order denying his motion for class certification and dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. *See Bissell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.,*937 F.Supp. 237 (S.D.N.Y.1996).

The facts here are identical to those in *Levitin v. Painewebber, Inc.,*159 F.3d 698, No. 96-7994, 1998 WL 665039 (2d Cir.1998) but for two matters. The first difference is that instead of posting as collateral cash or securities other than those being sold short, Bissell traded “against the box.” In trading “against the box,” the customer posts as collateral shares he owns that are identical to or convertible into those being sold short. The second difference from *Levitin*is that Bissell was a large trader who was able to negotiate a remittance of the earnings real*139ized by appellees on the shares he posted as collateral. He alleges, however, that only a portion of those earnings were remitted.

Neither difference is material, and we affirm for the reasons stated in *Levitin.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,734] 

                    By application postmarked April 12, 2007, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was                           ( print page 26849)                        issued on March 15, 2007 and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 30, 2007 (72 FR 15168).                 

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the finding that imports of WEB based line art illustrations did not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred. 

The Department reviewed the request for reconsideration and has determined that the petitioner has provided additional information. Therefore, the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. 

## Conclusion 

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 4th day of May, 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7-9104 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Len Ksobiech state and attest that:

(1)  I am the acting Treasurer of OneSource Technologies, Inc. (the "issuer").

(2)  Accompanying  this  certification  is the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
     March 31, 2003, a quarterly  report (the  "quarterly  report") filed by the
     issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange  Act"),  which
     contains financial statements.

(3)  I hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
     to  Section  906 of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  that  based  on my
     knowledge:

     a.   the  quarterly  report  containing  the  financial   statements  fully
          complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the
          Exchange Act, and

     b.   the information  contained in the periodic report fairly presents,  in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the issuer for the periods presented therein.


/s/ Len Ksobiech
----------------
Len Ksobiech

Date: 13 May 2003