alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Training helps warfighters deal with variety, bulk turn-ins

By Tim Hoyle  Disposition Services

                Gimcheon, South Korea  –              Federal Logistics Information SystemFederal Logistics Data on Mobile MediaDLA Disposition Services’ smart books
 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          72,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,501
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,072,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,227,171
<PP&E>                                       2,553,434
<DEPRECIATION>                               (583,100)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,557,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,435,466
<BONDS>                                        750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        750
<COMMON>                                      (33,291)
<OTHER-SE>                                     925,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,557,540
<SALES>                                      1,100,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,100,528
<CGS>                                        1,493,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,493,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,339,847
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               867,374
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             290,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,290,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,290,649)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (772,019)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,352,043)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)


</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-20-00166-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE 

OF CHRIS HOLT AND MICHELLE HOLT

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant attempted to perfect an appeal from a ruling on Special Exceptions and 

Motion to Strike entered by the 105th District Court of Nueces, County, Texas, in cause 

number 09-1754-D. The ruling does not appear to be a final appealable order. On March 

26, 2020, the clerk of the court notified appellant of this defect so steps could be taken to 

correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. The notice advised

appellant that if the defect was not corrected within thirty days, the appeal would be 

dismissed. Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice. 
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to 

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion the appeal should be dismissed. 

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(a),(c).

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed the 17th

day of September, 2020.
STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE

ONE COMMERCE PLAZA ANDREW M. CUOMO 99 WASHINGTON AVENUE CESAR A. PERALES GOVERNOR ALBANY, NY 12231-0001 SECRETARY OF STATE October4,2012 Mr. John Filippelli, Director Division ofEnvironmental Planning and Protection 

## u. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2, NPDES Section 290 Broadway, 25th Floor New York, NY 10007-1866 Re: F-2011-1041 (DA) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

- Submission of a consistency Determination for Two DRAFT NPDES permits for discharges incidental to the normal operation ofvessels, the Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) and the Vessel General Permit (VGP). Conditioned Concurrence with Consistency Determination DearMr. Filippelli: The Department of State has completed its review of the EPA's consistency determination regarding the consistency ofthe 2013 Drafts sVGP and VGP with the New York State Coastal Management Program. Based upon the information submitted, the Department ofState concurs with the EPA's consistency determination for the draft Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) without condition. Based upon the information submitted, the Department ofState concurs with the EPA's consistency determination for the Vessel General Permit (VGP) subject to the NYS Department ofEnvironmental ConservationFinal Water Quality Certification: Proposed 2013 VGP & sVGP

- September 2012 conditions. The DEC water quality certification conditions will also be incorporated into the EPA Final Permit for vessels operating within or may affect the coastal area ofNew York. Please contactJeffrey Zappieri at: (518) 474-6000 ifyou have any questions. 

# S

7j;;J;J**G~orge** R. Stafford Deputy Secretary ofState GRS/jls Attachment: New York Department of Environmental Conservation Final Water Quality Certification: Proposed2013 VGP & sVGP

- September2012

WWW
.DOS.NY

.GOV E-MAIL: INFO@DOS.NY.GOV
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.43

                       Amendment to EMPLOYMENT Agreement

     THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into effective as of
March 9, 2000, by and between Michael A. Wysocki (the "Employee") and United
Road Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have entered into that certain
Employment Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2000 (the "Original Agreement");
and

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the definition of
"Change of Control" in the Original Agreement to provide that a Change of
Control includes a change in control of the Company's Board of Directors that
results from a sale of the Company's securities.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto hereby agree:

     1.  The Original Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 4(b)(iv)
of the Original Agreement in its entirety and replacing said Section 4(b)(iv)
with the following:

          "(iv) any time that, as a result of or in connection with a tender
          offer, sale of securities, merger, consolidation, sale of assets or
          contested election, or any combination of such transactions, the
          persons who were directors of the Company immediately before such
          transaction or event cease to constitute a majority of the Board of
          Directors of the Company or of any successor to the Company at any
          time within one year after such transaction or event, or"

     2.  All remaining provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment to Option
Agreement as of the date first above written.

EMPLOYEE                                UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC.



By:  /s/ Michael A. Wysocki             By:  /s/ Gerald R. Riordan
     ----------------------                 ---------------------
     Michael A. Wysocki                     Gerald R. Riordan
     Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2191
GLENN SURBER, Petitioner, versus CANNELTON INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-1153-BLA) Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.S. F. Raymond Smith, RUNDLE & RUNDLE, L.C., Pineville, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Mary Rich Maloy, JACKSON & KELLY, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Glen Surber seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’sdecision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Surber v. Cannelton Industries, Inc. , BRB No. 99-1153-BLA, (B.R.B. Aug. 9, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2015205EN.01002602.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2015 — Skype v OHIM — Sky and Sky IP International (skype)

(Case T-423/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark skype - Earlier Community word mark SKY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 205/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Skype Ultd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented: initially by I. Fowler, Solicitor, J. Schmitt, lawyer, and J. Mellor QC, and subsequently by A. Carboni and M. Browne, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sky plc, formerly British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (Isleworth, United Kingdom); and Sky IP International Ltd (Isleworth) (represented by: D. Rose and V. Baxter, Solicitors, and subsequently by D. Rose, R. Guthrie, Solicitors, T. Moody-Stuart, Barrister, and J. Curry, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 July 2012 (Case R 1561/2010-4) concerning opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and Sky IP International Ltd and, on the other hand, Skype Ultd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Skype Ultd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Sky plc and Sky IP International Ltd. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Skype Ultd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Sky plc and Sky IP International Ltd.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.

1

---
33860.

#### ASSOCIATED DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al. v. WILLARD et al.

Nichols, Chief Justice.

Willard filed an equitable complaint to cancel certain liens filed by judgment creditors of T. M. Smith. Willard and Smith were the record title holders of the property on which the liens were filed. The trial court found that Smith had no equitable interest in the property and ordered the liens canceled. The order was entered on January 3, 1978, and filed with the clerk on January 5, 1978.

On April 11, 1978, appellants filed a petition for extension of time for filing an appeal, alleging that they were not notified of the court’s order until April 10,1978. After hearing, the trial court entered an order extending the time for filing a notice of appeal to May 10, 1978.

The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending that under the facts of this case, the trial court was without authority to enter the order extending the time for filing the notice of appeal.

"The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon the appellate court.

*248Submitted September 11, 1978

Decided September 27, 1978.

*Thomas E. Lawrence, Webb, Fowler & Tanner, Jones Webb, J. L. Edmondson,*for appellants.

*Harvey, Willard, Elliott & Olsen, Billy Olsen,*for appellees.

"We hold that the burden is on the party desiring to take the appeal to determine when the judgment is filed in the trial court, and the burden is on the party desiring to appeal to file his notice of appeal within the 30-day period or within a duly authorized extension of the 30-day period.

"This court does not have jurisdiction to review the judgment sought to be appealed because of the failure to confer jurisdiction upon this court pursuant to the Appellate Practice Act. Therefore the judgment below stands as rendered by the trial court.” *Jordan v. Caldwell,*229 Ga. 343, 344 (191 SE2d 530) (1972). See also *Rogers v. Rogers,*238 Ga. 576 (234 SE2d 495) (1977).

Code Ann. § 6-804 explicitly requires that any application for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal "must be made before expiration of the period for filing as originally prescribed” and that "only one extension of time shall be granted for filing of notice of appeal.” Those requirements are jurisdictional. *Jordan v. Caldwell,*supra.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hill, J., who concurs in the judgment only.*
No. 74-749.

#### Art Theatre Guild, Inc., et al. *v.*Parrish et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40064

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSUE DANIEL JIMENEZ DE LEON,

Also Known as Josue Daniel Rodriguez Jimenez,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 1:08-CR-926-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Josue Jiminez De Leon pleaded guilty pursuant to a written plea agreeUnited States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 18, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40064 Document: 00511146403 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2010
No. 10-40064

ment. Nearly eleven months after entry of judgment, he filed a notice of appeal

in which he also requested the appointment of counsel and for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Finding that the judgment of conviction and sentence

had become unappealable when no notice of appeal was timely filed, the district

court denied the request for appointed counsel but granted IFP status.

Jimenez De Leon now moves for appointment of counsel. This court may

dismiss an appeal when considering an interlocutory motion if the appeal “is

frivolous and entirely without merit.” 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Jimenez De Leon did not

file a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence within 10

days after entry of judgment. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). His appeal also

was noticed beyond the 30-day time limit for extending the appeal period under

FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(4). He is not entitled to have the untimeliness of his notice

of appeal disregarded. See United States v. Leijano-Cruz, 473 F.3d 571, 574 (5th

Cir. 2006). Because the appeal is without arguable merit, we deny appointment

of counsel and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

2

Case: 10-40064 Document: 00511146403 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2010
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the 10-QSB of  American  Utilicraft  Corporation  (the
"Company"), the undersigned officers hereby certify that the Company's quarterly
report on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  that  ended  September  30,  2004 (the
"Report"),  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date
hereof,

     a)   fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78M or 78O (D)); and

     b)   that information  contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the issuer



     This certificate is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not
be  deemed  to be a part  of the  Report  or  "filed"  for  any  other  purposes
whatsoever.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this certificate to be signed by
it Chief Financial Officer and its Principal Accounting Officer this 19th day of
November, 2004.


 /s/ John J. Dupont                         /s/ M. Karen Shoemaker
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
John J. Dupont                             M. Karen Shoemaker
President and Chief Executive Officer      Principal Accounting Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# The DLA Culture/Climate Survey is Open 

By Brenda MinnemaDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
To participate in the survey, check your DLA email account for a direct link.

For more information, two **videos** are included for your viewing pleasure: 

1)  DLA Director's video for the 2018 DLA Culture/Climate Survey.Watch Lt. Gen. Williams here. 

2) Also, DLA Training recently released the 2018 LMS Culture Survey Video to givemore indepth details regarding the how and why **watch LMS here**, Search LMS, for DLA Culture Survey and Self-assign. 

Additional information can be found on the DLA HQ Culture Website;please click on the links below for the following documents: 

1)  2018 Culture Survey Fact Sheet 

2)  2018 Confidentiality Fact Sheet

3)  2018 DLA Culture Survey FAQs  

4)  2018 Job Aid Electronic 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCulture L&MHealth and Wellness L&MWellness L&MResilency L&MPeople & Culture L&MFortify the Culture L&M