alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families 

Notice is hereby given that I have redelegated to the Regional Program Managers, Office of Child Support Enforcement, the following authorities vested in me by the Assistant Secretary of Administration for Children and Families in the memoranda dated February 16, 2007. 

(a) Authorities Delegated. 

1. The authority to approve Title IV-D State plans and amendments. 

2. Authority to certify and transmit State requests for full collection services by the Secretary of Treasury and State applications to use courts of the United States to enforce court orders. 

(b) Limitations. 

1. These redelegations shall be exercised under financial and administrative requirements applicable to all Administration for Children and Families authorities. 

2. The authority to approve Title IV-D State plans and amendments requires review and clearance by legal counsel and consultation with Central Office, Office of Child Support Enforcement, except as provided in written guidelines issued by the Commissioner. 

3. These authorities may not be redelegated. 

(c) Effective Date. 

This redelegation is effective on the date of signature. 

(d) Effect on Existing Delegations. 

This redelegation of authority supersedes all previous delegations from the Deputy Director/Commissioner, Office of Child Support Enforcement, on these subjects. 

I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by any Regional Program Manager which, in effect, involved the exercise of these authorities prior to the effective date of this redelegation. 

Dated: May 10, 2007. 

Margot Bean, 

Deputy Director/Commissioner, Office of Child Support Enforcement.

[FR Doc. E7-9671 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
<PAGE>
SUBSIDIARIES OF LIBERTY GROUP OPERATING, INC. - EXHIBIT 21


Name                                                 Jurisdiction
---------------------------------------------        ------------
Liberty Group Arizona Holdings, Inc.                   Delaware
Liberty Group Arkansas Holdings, Inc.                  Delaware
Liberty Group California Holdings, Inc.                Delaware
Liberty Group Idaho Holdings, Inc.                     Delaware
Liberty Group Illinois Holdings, Inc.                  Delaware
Liberty Group Iowa Holdings, Inc.                      Delaware
Liberty Group Kansas Holdings, Inc.                    Delaware
Liberty Group Louisiana Holdings, Inc.                 Delaware
Liberty Group Michigan Holdings, Inc.                  Delaware
Liberty Group Minnesota Holdings, Inc.                 Delaware
Liberty Group Missouri Holdings, Inc.                  Delaware
Liberty Group Nebraska Holdings, Inc.                  Delaware
Liberty Group Nevada Holdings, Inc.                    Delaware
Liberty Group New York Holdings, Inc.                  Delaware
Liberty Group North Dakota Holdings, Inc.              Delaware
Liberty Group Pennsylvania Holdings, Inc.              Delaware
Liberty Group Management Services, Inc.                Delaware
Liberty Group Suburban Newspapers, Inc.                Delaware
Liberty Group Southern Michigan Holdings, Inc.         Delaware
Liberty SMC, L.L.C.                                    Delaware
News Leader, Inc.                                      Louisiana
Mineral Daily News Tribune Inc.                        West Virginia
Elko Daily Free Press                                  Nevada
Terry Newspapers, Inc.                                 Iowa
P.O. Box 519 • Moore Haven, FL 33471 • 800 226-4024 • Fax 863 946-6262 • www.gladesec.com

Lake Placid 800 226-4025 • Fax 863 531-5012 Okeechobee 800 226-4023 • Fax 863 467-0855

November 9, 2010

The Honorable Lisa Jackson

Administrator

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Ariel Rios Building (Mail Code 1101)

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, D.C. 20460

Re: Petition for Reconsideration of Portions of the Final Rule: National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines

Dear Administrator Jackson:

I am writing in support of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association’s (NRECA) October 19, 

2020, Petition for Reconsideration of portions of the Final National Emission Standards for Hazardous 

Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines promulgated on August 20, 2010, (75 Fed. 

Reg. 51,570). 

Glades Electric Cooperative serves portions of four counties in Florida; Highlands, Okeechobee, Glades, 

and Hendry. Our service territory is predominantly rural and heavily reliant on agriculture. The recession 

has been extremely tough on our consumers and our counties have the highest unemployment figures in 

the state. In fact, our service territory has been designated as a Rural Area of Critical Economic Concern 

(RACEC). Additionally, the impending sale of U.S. Sugar Corporation to the State for Everglades’

restoration has the potential to further devastate our area’s economy. The EPA does not need to be 

adding to the electricity bills of our members!

NRECA’s petition addresses restrictions contained in the final rule that prohibit the use of small 

emergency generating units for peak shaving programs and limits demand reduction service beginning in 

2013 without the addition of expensive emission reduction technology on units larger than a specified 

size. Glades Electric supports NRECA’s recommendation of the removal of the restrictions on the use of 

these engines for peak shaving and demand reduction purposes within the 100 hours of non-emergency 

operations already allowed under EPA rule. 

We feel that, by not asking for additional hours beyond the 100 already provided within the rule, there 

would be no additional emissions and, therefore, no additional risk to health or environment, and would 

preserve a means of keeping energy affordable in rural areas.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or require additional information. 

Thank you for your consideration.

Paul McGehee

Business Development Manager

cc: Robert Wayland

Melanie King

Kevin Bromberg, SBA
No. 75-867.

#### Puget Sound Power & Light Co. *v.*Local Union 77, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc.
of Nevada;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

                                /s/ Donald R. Mayer
Date: November 10, 2004         ____________________________________________
                                Donald R. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer
# C_2013189EN.01002903.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/29

---

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou v Commission

(Case T-498/12) (1)

1

2013/C 189/61

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
# C_2012295EN.01002402.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/24

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Tivoli (Italy) lodged on 3 August 2012 — Enrico Petillo, Carlo Petillo v Unipol

(Case C-371/12)

2012/C 295/44

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Tivoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Enrico Petillo, Carlo Petillo

Applicants:

Defendant: Unipol

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

In the light of Directives 72/166/EEC, (1) 84/5/EEC, (2) 90/232/EEC (3) and 2009/103/EC (4) governing compulsory insurance against civil liability arising from the use of motor vehicles, is it permissible for the domestic legislation of a Member State effectively to provide — by imposing, solely in the case of damage arising from road traffic accidents, a compulsory method for quantifying the damage — a limitation (in terms of quantification) of the liability for non-material damage lying with the persons (insurance companies) obliged under those directives to ensure compulsory insurance for damage caused by the use of vehicles?

1

2

3

4

---

(1)  Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (OJ, English Special Edition 1972 (II), p. 360).

1

(2)  Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (OJ 1984 L 8, p. 17).

2

(3)  Third Council Directive 90/232/EEC of 14 May 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (OJ 1990 L 129, p. 33).

3

(4)  Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (OJ 2009 L 263, p. 11).

4

---
No. 45272.

#### Protest 46650-K of Italian Felt & Straw Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Bbown, J.

It was stipulated that the wool hoods in question are similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.
#### Maddock & Miller, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6505.

Entry No. 701847, etc.

Invoices dated Hanley, England, June 1943, etc.

Certified June 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 20, 1943, etc.

(Decided November 13, 1946)

*B. A. Levett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination óf the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions- made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in. similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
      10.9

    


     

    CAPITAL
      TEN ACQUISITION CORP.

    


    ____________,
      2008

    


    Capital
      TEN Partners, LLC

    116
      Village Boulevard

    Princeton,
      New Jersey 08540

     

    Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date
      (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering
      (“IPO”) of the securities of Capital TEN Acquisition Corp. (“Company”) and
      continuing until the consummation by the Company of a “Business Combination” (as
      described in the Company’s IPO prospectus) or its liquidation, Capital TEN
      Partners, LLC shall make available to the Company certain general and
      administrative services including office space, utilities and secretarial
      support, as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 116
      Village Boulevard, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 (or any successor location).
      In
      exchange therefor, the Company shall pay Capital TEN Partners, LLC the sum
      of
      $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly
      thereafter.

     

    


    Very
      truly yours,

    


    CAPITAL
      TEN ACQUISITION CORP.

    


    By: 
      _________________________    

    Name:
      Elliot P. Friedman

    Title:
      Chief Executive Officer

    


    AGREED
      TO
      AND ACCEPTED BY:

    


    CAPITAL
      TEN PARTNERS, LLC

    


     

    By:
      ______________________     

    Name:
      

    Title:
# C_2012295EN.01001902.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/19

---

Appeal brought on 16 July 2012 by Pi-Design AG, Bodum France and Bodum Logistics A/S against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 May 2012 in Case T-331/10: Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-337/12 P)

2012/C 295/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Pi-Design AG, Bodum France, and Bodum Logistics A/S, (represented by: H. Pernez, Advocate)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:

| — | Squash the judgment of the General Court |
| --- | --- |

—

Squash the judgment of the General Court

| — | Annul the Community trademark 1 371 244 |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Community trademark 1 371 244

Subsidiairily

| — | Refer the case back to the General Court with the obligation to refer the case back to the Board of Appeal in the case of annulment of the latter's decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

Refer the case back to the General Court with the obligation to refer the case back to the Board of Appeal in the case of annulment of the latter's decision.

| — | Order YOSHIDA METAL INDUSTRY CO. LTD. to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order YOSHIDA METAL INDUSTRY CO. LTD. to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellants submit that the contested judgment should be annulled on the ground that the General court infringed Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of the Community trade mark regulation by applying incorrect criteria in the identification of the essential characteristics of the contested sign and by distorting the evidence before it.

---
#### F. W. Myers & Company, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7747.

Entry No. A-2702.

(Decided October 21, 1949)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley 8. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Charles J. Miville,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeal for reappraisement shown on the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States,*R. D. 7624, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that the appraised value of the merchandise involved in the case shown on the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-48343, No. 333-48345, No. 333-48347, No.
333-48349 and No. 333-48353) of Vlasic Foods International Inc. of our report
dated September 16, 1998 appearing on page 47 of the Annual Report to
Shareowners which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
October 19, 1998
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, ALEXANDER GILLILAND, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of PrimePlayer
Incorporated.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003


/s/  Alexander Gilliland
------------------------
Alexander Gilliland
Principal Executive and Financial Officer