alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013026EN.01007501.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/75

---

Action brought on 9 November 2012 — ZZ v Council

(Case F-136/12)

2013/C 26/155

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment, firstly, of Council Decision 2011/866/EU of 19 December 2011 concerning the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation adjusting the remuneration and pension of the officials and other servants of the European Union and, secondly, the salary statements for January, February and March 2012 established pursuant to that decision.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions of the Council expressed in the salary statements of January 2012 et seq. and in the statements of 2011 inasmuch as they do not apply the adjustment rate of 1,7 % proposed by the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of the Council expressed in the salary statements of January 2012 et seq. and in the statements of 2011 inasmuch as they do not apply the adjustment rate of 1,7 % proposed by the Commission;

| — | Order the Council to reimburse the applicant the difference between the salary amounts paid pursuant to the Council Decision of 19 December 2011 until the date of judgment in the present case and those which ought to have been paid to him had the adjustment been correctly calculated, together with interest at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for main refinancing operations applicable during the relevant periods, increased by three and a half points, with effect from the date on which the sums of the principal claim fell due; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to reimburse the applicant the difference between the salary amounts paid pursuant to the Council Decision of 19 December 2011 until the date of judgment in the present case and those which ought to have been paid to him had the adjustment been correctly calculated, together with interest at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for main refinancing operations applicable during the relevant periods, increased by three and a half points, with effect from the date on which the sums of the principal claim fell due;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

---
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002I, Alan R. Rae, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of O2Diesel Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2005/s/ Alan R. Rae
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          4,090
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    20,795
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         87,135
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           84,469
<LOANS>                                        47,751
<ALLOWANCE>                                       241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                142,546
<DEPOSITS>                                     82,317
<SHORT-TERM>                                   10,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               856
<LONG-TERM>                                    30,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          155
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,718
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                142,546
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 3,345
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               5,083
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  229
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                8,657
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              3,539
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,025
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           3,632
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      36
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 3,091
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,377
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        855
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      855
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .63
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.78
<LOANS-NON>                                        81
<LOANS-PAST>                                      190
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   81
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   103
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  206
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       1
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 241
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               11
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           230



</TABLE>
SERVED JULY 16,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION /i I' 0: TMO! 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ROSLYNE MARIE ELDER, 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0004 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0315 

HEARING NOTICE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing in this case will be held on July29, 2010, 

beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time at the following location: 

Alan Bible Federal Building 

600 Las Vegas Building, South 

Room 690 

Las Vegas NV 89101 

Allow time to pass through security. 

Isaac D.iBenkin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment-Service List 
FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SW0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE iilST 

ORIGINM. & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGGT43 0 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1OOO' 

ONE COPY 

Edward A. Lopez, Respondent's Former Counsel 

Venture Corporate Center 

3440 Hollywood Blvd. Suite 415 

Hollywood, FL 33021 

TEL: 954-241-4205 

FAX: 954-241-4206 

Roslyne Iliarie Elder, Respondent 

835 Sierra Vista Drive, Apt. 326 

Las Vegas, NV 89169 

TEL: 702-412-5640 

Yolandia Ayala Bemal, Complainant's Counsel 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Coimsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E3, YAB 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: 817-222-5070 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Departaient of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washing^n, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by eiqpe^toi couriffl-, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wri0\t Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
(Reap. Dec. 9668)

#### Leyden Customs Expediters *v.*United States

Entry No. 896951.

(Decided April 18, 1960)

*Eugene R. Piclcrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> It is stipulated and agreed by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States, covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above, at which time *such or*similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade . . . was the export value of DM 216.00 per 100 kilos F.O.B. Hamburg as defined in Section 402(d).

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appeal to reappraisement referred to herein be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I hold the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved merchandise, and that such value was DM 215 per 100 kilos, f .o.b. Hamburg.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 96-5983.

#### Gilbert *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# C_2012065EN.01002802.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/28

---

Action brought on 20 January 2012 — ZZ v EASA

(Case F-8/12)

2012/C 65/56

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: B.-H. Vincent, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to dismiss the applicant and compensation for damage claimed to be suffered because of that dismissal and alleged harassment.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | order EASA to pay EUR 1 514 257,48 in compensation for material and non-material damage associated with the loss of the applicant’s temporary staff post, with the addition of interest at the legal rate from the date at which interest is due; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EASA to pay EUR 1 514 257,48 in compensation for material and non-material damage associated with the loss of the applicant’s temporary staff post, with the addition of interest at the legal rate from the date at which interest is due;

| — | order EASA to pay a daily sum fixed on an equitable basis at EUR 500,00 per day from 31 May 2010 until the date of service of final judgment as compensation for the entirety of the damage caused by harassment committed by EASA agents, with the addition of interest at the legal rate from the date at which interest is due; |
| --- | --- |

—

order EASA to pay a daily sum fixed on an equitable basis at EUR 500,00 per day from 31 May 2010 until the date of service of final judgment as compensation for the entirety of the damage caused by harassment committed by EASA agents, with the addition of interest at the legal rate from the date at which interest is due;

| — | order EASA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EASA to pay the costs.

---
No. 48823.

#### Protests 65773-K, etc., of T. D. Downing Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Nortel Networks Limited, a Canadian
corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 10, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ MIKE S. ZAFIROVSKI               
|                         |  |  |  | Mike S. Zafirovski                   
|                         |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                         |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: November 10, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ PAVITER S. BINNING                              
|                         |  |  |  | Paviter S. Binning                                  
|                         |  |  |  | Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017369EN.01000801.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/8

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2017 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-327/15) (1)

1

((EAGGF - Guidance Section - Reduction of financial assistance - Operational programme - Legal basis - Transitional provisions - Application of financial corrections after the programming period concerned - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Failure to comply with the time-limit for adopting a decision - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Ne bis in idem - Proportionality))

(2017/C 369/09)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: G. Kanellopoulos, O. Tsirkinidou and A. Vasilopoulou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Aquilina and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 1936 final of 25 March 2015 on applying financial correction on the EAGGF Guidance Section of the Operational Programme CCI No 2000GR061PO021 (GREECE — Objective 1 — Rural Reconstruction).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2015.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 21, 2016

a1214

Order 

Clerk

December 21, 2016

154665 & (19)

JENNIFER GRZEBYK, Guardian of 

CEDRIC GRZEBYK, a legally 

incapacitated person,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154665

COA: 333707

Oakland CC: 2015-148519-NF

AUTOMOBILE CLUB INSURANCE 

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### United States *v.*American Import Co., c/o H. R. Lockwood

No. 6140.

Invoice dated Mexico, D. F., July 28, 1943.

Certified July 28, 1943.

Entered at Laredo, Tex., September 30, 1943.

Entry No. 1949.

(Decided May 1, 1945)

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Philip Stein*for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement presents for deter* mi nation the proper dutiable value of cotton rag rugs exported from Mexico and entered at Laredo, Tex.

When the case was called for hearing at the port of entry on March 6, 1945, counsel stipulated that the,items of “Labels ‘Made in-Mexico’ ” and “Clasps,” as invoiced, should be added to the appraised value to make the proper dutiable value of the instant merchandise.

On the stipulated facts, I hold the value of the imported merchandise to be the appraised value plus the items hereinabove referred to. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Walter Thomas Price III, Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Walter Thomas Price IIIWalter Thomas Price IIIManaging Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., General Partner of the PartnershipDate: November 16, 2005




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extend that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



19