alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Senior leaders preview new combined SAPR/EEO training 

By DLA Public Affairs

DLA’s SAPR OfficeDLA Equal Opportunity OfficeDLA Human Resources

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

assaultharassmentSAPRMoraleworforceEEOdiscriminationTrainingLearningLMSsupervisorshuman resourcesEqual Employmentsexual assaultSexual Assault Prevention and Response
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6149.

Invoice dated Sonneberg, Germany, June 17, 1939.

Certified June 20, 1939.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., July 24, 1939.

Entry No. 256 (2).

(Decided May 10, 1945)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the plaintiff'..

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special' attorney)-, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

In a written stipulation, filed May 4, 1945, counsel for tbe respective parties have limited this appeal for reappraisement to the merchandise represented by the invoice items marked ‘‘xx,”' in green ink initialed “CHR,” and have agreed that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission included in the appraised value of said items are the same as those, found in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, and that the record in said case be incorporated herein.

In the cited case, it was found that sales, to which the item in question was applied, “were fugitive and not in the ordinary course-of trade in the principal market of Germany.” Accordingly, it was held not to be a consideration in determining dutiable value.

The same conclusion is applicable here, and in the light of stipulated facts, as they are embodied in the record before me, that merchandise, such as or similar to that hereinabove referred to, was freely offered for sale at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise-to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade-for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3JÍ per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no-higher foreign value, I hold export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis, for appraisement of the invoice items marked “xx” in green ink, initialed “CHR,” and that such value is the *per se*unit values, plus *“3%%*Insurance, Vacation & Holiday costs,” and packing, as invoiced.

The appeal, having been abandoned as to all other merchandise, is hereby dismissed so far as it relates thereto.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 96-5946.

#### Daniels *v.*Burke, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential.


# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

CIRBA INC.,

Appellant

v.

VMWARE, INC.,

Appellee

______________________

2023

- 1478

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. PGR2021

- 00098

.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App.

P. 42 (b). Case: 23-1478 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 07/15/2024C IRBA I NC

. V

. VM WARE

, I NC

. 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

July 15, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 15, 2024 Case: 23-1478 Document: 44 Page: 2 Filed: 07/15/2024
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted), Edward A. Keible, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of EndwaveCorporation (the “Company”), and Julianne M. Biagini, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:
     **1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the***“Quarterly Report”***) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) orsection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
     **2. **The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
     **In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the13th day of August, 2004.   /s/ EDWARD A. KEIBLE, JR. /s/ JULIANNE M. BIAGINI   Edward A. Keible, Jr. Julianne M. BiaginiChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of Endwave Corporation under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

D ecember 21 , 2016

a1214 

# Order

Clerk December 21 , 2016

154665 & (19)

JENNIFER GRZEBYK, G ua rdian of

CEDRIC GRZEBYK, a legally

incapacitated person,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154665

COA: 333707

Oakland CC: 2015

- 148519

- NF

AUTOMOBILE CLUB INSURANCE

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

T he application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions

presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 99.1

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Saiph Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Suki Mudan, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.

/s/ Suki Mudan
Suki Mudan
President

Date:  November 14, 2002
#### STATE ex rel. Jerry TUCKER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 97-KH-2948.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Tucker, Jerry;—Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 4-90-16; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW97 2157.

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La.9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.
---

Exhibit 99.7

CONSENT OF AUTHOR July 23 , 2010 Pacific Rim Mining Corp. 
#1050  625 Howe Street 
Vancouver, BC
V6C 2T6 Dear Sirs/Mesdames: Re:
     Pacific Rim Mining CorporationConsent
  The undersigned hereby consents to being named in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended April 30, 2010 (the Form 20-F). I confirm that I have read the Form 20-F and have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein or that the written disclosure contains any misrepresentation, confirm that the information contained therein accurately represents the information that supports the written disclosure and confirm that such matters are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me. Sincerely, William Gehlen William Gehlen


---
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statements of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. listed below of our reports    dated December 1, 2006, with respect to the consolidated    financial statements of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc., Jacuzzi Brands,    Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness    of internal control over financial reporting of Jacuzzi Brands,    Inc., included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    for the year ended September 30, 2006.      •     Registration Statement    No. 333-84461    on    Form S-3,    as amended, dated August 17, 1999 and related Prospectus      •     Registration Statement    No. 333-111479    on    Form S-4,    as amended, dated January 9, 2004 and related Prospectus      •     Registration Statement    No. 333-47101    on    Form S-4,    as amended, dated May 13, 1998 and related Joint Proxy    Statement/Prospectus      •     Registration Statement    No. 333-70537    on    Form S-4,    as amended, dated June 10, 1999 and related Prospectus      •     Registration Statement    No. 333-112281    on    Form S-8    dated February 17, 2004 and related Prospectus      •     Registration Statement    No. 333-30976    on    Form S-8    dated February 23, 2000      •     Registration Statement    No. 333-56675    on    Form S-8    dated June 12, 1998      •     Registration Statement    No. 333-56615    on    Form S-8    dated June 11, 1998 /s/  Ernst &    Young LLP    Certified Public Accountants     West Palm Beach, Florida    December 1, 2006
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Australian  Agriculture Property
Development  Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry Chauhan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  May 23, 2005                         By: /s/ Harry Chauhan
                                                    -------------
                                                    Harry Chauhan
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2435
WILLIAM F. WRIGHT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 95-1774) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William F. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Gary R. Allen, Richard Farber, Sally J. Schornstheimer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the tax court's order dismissing his petition and imposing a penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673 (1988) based on the frivolous nature of the allegations raised in his petition. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Wright v. Commissioner , Tax Ct. No. 95-1774 (U.S. Tax Ct. May 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Culture Success Story--DLA Troop Support War Games

By Culture CouncilDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
DLA’s people are its “secret sauce,” and employees can help shape DLA’s future by participating in the 2018 DLA Culture/Climate Survey. 

Watch this short video to learn how DLA Troop Support’s Clothing & Textiles Directorate uses war games to streamline their processes and be ready for any situation. 

The idea of war games was created based on employee input from the last Culture/Climate survey. 

Be sure to complete the survey by close of business April 17.

**Your Voice is Our Future!**

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCulture L&MFortify the Culture L&MHealth and Wellness L&MResilency L&MWellness L&MVideo L&M
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Curtis THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 72181.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

July 21, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 30,1998.

Patrick Conroy, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel G. Cierpiot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Thomas, Defendant, appeals from a jury conviction of one count of murder in the first degree for which Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

After having reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, we find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
* The court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40136 Summary Calendar

JEFFREY BENSON DURHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:96-CV-89

- - - - - - - - - - August 7, 1997 Before WISDOM, DUHE’, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jeffrey Benson Durham, Texas prisoner # 670219, filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various prison officials. The district court dismissed Durham’s complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. A § 1915 dismissal is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 10 (5th Cir. 1994). Durham asserts that the defendants were deliberatelyNo. 97-40136 - 2 - indifferent to his serious medical needs and had retaliated against him for filing grievances. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, ___, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1980 (1994); Woods v. Smith , 60 F.3d 1161, 1166 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 800 (1996). With respect to Durham’s allegations that Dr. Browne changed his medical classification based on x-rays alone without looking at his ankle and became belligerent and falsified Durham’s medical file following Durham’s filing of a grievance, the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the claims of deliberate indifference and retaliation as being without a basis in fact or law. This dismissal of Dr. Browne is VACATED. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the remainder of the claims against the other medical, security, and supervisory personnel. This portion of the dismissal is AFFIRMED. Durham’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED. We do not consider whether exceptional circumstances exist which may require the appointment of counsel as this case proceeds to trial. The case is hereby remanded to the district court for additional proceedings consistent with this opinion. AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART; MOTION DENIED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Skibski, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John L. Skibski
---------------------------
John L. Skibski
Chief Financial Officer
May 6, 2005
Order entered December 19, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00456-CV

WILLIAM CHU, Appellant

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE

CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF SOUNDVIEW HOME LOAN TRUST 2005-OPT3, 

ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATE SERIES 2005-OPT3 AND 

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09-13182

ORDER

We GRANT the parties’ agreed motion to release the supersedeas bond. We ORDER

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, to release the bond and mail the proceeds of the 

payment bond to William Chu at his place of business, 4455 LBJ Freeway, #909, Dallas, Texas 

75244.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE