U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year						 Commission file number

ended December 31, 2000                                                               333-47291

SOUTHERN HERITAGE BANCORP, INC.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Georgia								 58-2386654

(State of Incorporation)						 (I.R.S. Employer

									 Identification No.)

3461 Atlanta Highway

P. O. Box 907

Oakwood, Georgia 										30566

(Address of principal executive offices)			 (Zip Code)

(770) 531-1240

(Issuer's telephone number)

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common stock, $5.00 par value

(Title of Class)

Check whether Issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

											Yes X No
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive Proxy or InformationStatements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]

Registrant's revenues for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 were $3,202,394.

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant at March 15, 2001 was $7,148,340 based on recent private sales known to the Registrant at a price of $10.00 per share. There is no establishedtrading market for the Registrant's stock.

The number of shares outstanding of Registrant's class of common stock at March 15, 2001 was 878,344 shares of common stock.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: Certain pages of the 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders and the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 30, 2001 are incorporated herein by reference in Parts II,III, and IV of this Form 10-KSB.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):

YesNo X 
Page 1 of ____

Exhibit Index on Page ___

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I					Page
 

ITEM 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS .........................	 3

ITEM 2.	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES........................	 13

ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS................................	 14

ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF

		SECURITY HOLDERS.................................	 14

 

PART II

ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND

		RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS......................	 14

ITEM 6.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

		OR PLAN OF OPERATION ............................	 14 

ITEM 7.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ............................	 14

ITEM 8.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH

		ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND

		FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE ............................	 15

 

PART III

ITEM 9.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS

		AND CONTROL PERSONS .............................	 15

ITEM 10.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ..........................	 15

ITEM 11.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN

		BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT ................	 15

ITEM 12.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND

		RELATED TRANSACTIONS ............................	 15

ITEM 13.	EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K ................	 16

SIGNATURES ................................................	 17

 

 
**PART I

ITEM 1.	DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
(a)	Business Development

Southern Heritage Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company"), Oakwood, Georgia, was incorporated as a Georgia business corporation for the purpose of becoming a bank holding company by acquiring all of the common stock of Southern HeritageBank, Oakwood, Georgia (the "Bank") upon its formation. The Company filed applications to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Board") and the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (the "DBF") for prior approval to become a bankholding company. The Company received Board approval on April 30, 1998, and the DBF approval on April 28, 1998. The Company became a bank holding company within the meaning of the federal Bank Holding Company Act (the "Act") and the Georgia bank holdingcompany law (the "Georgia Act") upon the acquisition of all of the Common Stock of the Bank, which occurred in January, 1999.

The Bank is the sole operating subsidiary of the Company. On October 31, 1997, the Bank received the approval of its Articles of Incorporation from the DBF. Its permit to begin business has been issued, and it opened for business onJanuary 4, 1999. The deposits at the Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC"), initial approval by the FDIC having been obtained on March 19, 1998.

In April, 1998, the Company registered 1,000,000 shares of its common stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933. The registration statement became effective on April 29, 1998, and the Companybegan its stock offering a few days later. The stock offering was completed by January, 1999 and the shares were issued as of January 4, 1999. 878,344 shares were sold in the offering, raising total capital of $8,783,440.
**(b)	Business of Issuer**
The Bank conducts a general commercial banking business in its primary service area, emphasizing the banking needs of individuals and small to medium-sized businesses. The Company conducts business from its office located at 3461Atlanta Highway, Flowery Branch, Georgia 30542.

The Company is authorized to engage in any activity permitted by law to a corporation, subject to applicable Federal regulatory restrictions on the activities of bank holding companies. The Company was formed for the purpose ofbecoming a holding company to own 100% of the stock of the Bank. The holding company structure provides the Company with greater flexibility than the Bank. While the Company has no present plans to engage actively in any nonbanking business activities,management anticipates studying the feasibility of establishing or acquiring subsidiaries to engage in other business activities to the extent permitted by law.

The principal business of the Bank is to accept deposits from the public and to make loans and other investments in and around Hall County, Georgia, as well as the geographically adjacent counties, its primary service area.

The Bank offers a full range of deposit services that are typically available from financial institutions. The Bank offers personal and business checking accounts, interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money marketdeposit accounts and various types of certificates of deposit. The Bank also offers installment loans, real estate loans, second mortgage loans, commercial loans and home equity lines of credit. In addition, the Bank provides such services as officialbank checks and money orders, Mastercard and VISA credit cards, safe deposit boxes, traveler's checks, bank by mail, direct deposit of payroll and social security checks, and US Savings Bonds. All deposit accounts are insured by the FDIC up to the maximumamount currently permitted by law.

The Bank's lending philosophy is to make loans, taking into consideration the safety of the Bank's depositors' funds, the preservation of the Bank's liquidity, the interest of the Company's shareholders, and the welfare of thecommunity. Interest income from the Bank's lending operations will be the principal component of the Bank's income, so therefore prudent lending will be essential for the prosperity of the Bank.

The principal sources of income for the Bank will be interest and fees collected on loans, interest and dividends collected on other investments, and mortgage brokerage fees. The principal expenses of the Bank will be interest paid ondeposits, employee compensation, office expenses, and other overhead expenses.

The Bank's business plan for its initial years of operation relies principally upon local advertising and promotional activity and upon personal contacts by its directors, officers and shareholders to attract business and to acquaintpotential customers with the Bank's personalized services. The Bank emphasizes a high degree of personalized client service in order to be able to provide for each customer's banking needs. The Bank's marketing approach emphasizes the advantages ofdealing with an independent, locally-owned and managed state chartered bank to meet the particular needs of individuals, professionals and small-to-medium-size businesses in the community. All banking services are continually evaluated with regard totheir profitability and efforts will be made to modify the Bank's business plan if the Bank does not prove successful. The Bank does not presently offer trust or permissible securities services.
**Supervision and Regulation

Regulation of the Bank. The operations of the Bank are subject to state and federal statutes applicable to state chartered banks whose deposits are insured by the FDIC and the regulations of the DBF and the FDIC. Such statutesand regulations relate to, among other things, required reserves, investments, loans, mergers and consolidations, issuances of securities, payment of dividends, establishment of branches and other aspects of the Bank's operations. Under the provisions ofthe Federal Reserve Act, the Bank is subject to certain restrictions on any extensions of credit to the Company or, with certain exceptions, other affiliates, and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral on loans to any borrower. Inaddition, the Bank is prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or the providing of any property or service.

The Bank, as a state chartered bank, is permitted to branch only to the extent that banks are permitted to branch under Georgia law. In January 1996, the Georgia legislature passed a bill designed to eliminate Georgia's intra-countybranching restrictions. Effective as of July 1, 1998, full statewide branching went into effect permitting Georgia banks to establish new branches in any county in the state with prior approval of the appropriate regulatory authorities.

The FDIC adopted final risk-based capital guidelines for all FDIC insured state chartered banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System effective December 31, 1990. As of December 31, 1992, all banks are required to maintaina minimum ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of 8 percent (of which at least 4 percent must consist of Tier 1 capital). Tier 1 capital of state chartered banks (as defined in regulations) generally consists of (i) common stockholders equity;(ii) noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus; and (iii) minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries.

In addition, the FDIC adopted a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of banks. This capital measure is generally referred to as the leverage capital ratio. The FDIC has established a minimum leverage capital ratio of 3percent if the FDIC determines that the institution is not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and has well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings and, in general, isconsidered a strong banking organization, rated Composite 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System. Other financial institutions are expected to maintain leverage capital at least 100 to 200 basis points above the minimum level. Managementintends to operate the Bank so as to exceed the minimum Tier 1, risk-based and leverage capital ratios.

Bank regulators continue to indicate their desire to raise capital requirements applicable to banking organizations, including a proposal to add an interest rate risk component to risk-based capital requirements.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991, enacted in December 1991 ("FDICIA"), specifies, among other things, the following five capital standard categories for depository institutions: (i) well capitalized,(ii) adequately capitalized, (iii) undercapitalized, (iv) significantly under-capitalized and (v) critically undercapitalized. FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive constraints on operations, management and capital distributions depending on thecategory in which an institution is classified. Each of the federal banking agencies has issued final uniform regulations that became effective December 19, 1992, which, among other things, define the capital levels described above. Under the finalregulations, a bank is considered "well capitalized" if it (i) has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, (ii) has a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater, (iii) has a leverage ratio of 5% or greater, and (iv) is not subject to anyorder or written directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. An "adequately capitalized" bank is defined as one that has (i) a total risk-based capital ratio of 8% or greater, (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of4% or greater and (iii) a leverage ratio of 4% or greater, and an "undercapitalized" bank is defined as one that has (i) a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%, (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4%, and (iii) a leverage ratioof less than 4%. A bank is considered "significantly undercapitalized" if the bank has (i) a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%, (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3%, and (iii) a leverage ratio of less than 3%, and"critically undercapitalized" if the bank has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets equal to or less than 2%. The applicable federal regulatory agency for a bank that is "well capitalized" may reclassify it as an "adequately capitalized" or"undercapitalized" institution and subject it to the supervisory actions applicable to the next lower capital category, if it determines that the Bank is in an unsafe or unsound condition or deems the bank to be engaged in an unsafe or unsound practiceand not to have corrected the deficiency.

"Undercapitalized" depository institutions, among other things, are subject to growth limitations, are prohibited, with certain exceptions, from making capital distributions, are limited in their ability to obtain funding from aFederal Reserve Bank and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. The federal banking agencies may not accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed inrestoring the depository institution's capital. In addition, for a capital restoration plan to be acceptable, the depository institution's parent holding company must guarantee that the institution will comply with such capital restoration plan andprovide appropriate assurances of performance. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, including if the holding company refuses or is unable to make the guarantee described in the previous sentence, it is treated as if it is"significantly undercapitalized". Failure to submit or implement an acceptable capital plan also is grounds for the appointment of a conservator or a receiver. "Significantly undercapitalized" depository institutions may be subject to a number ofadditional requirements or restrictions, including the requirement to issue additional voting stock to become adequately capitalized and requirements to reduce total assets and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks. "Criticallyundercapitalized" institutions, among other things, are prohibited from making any payments of principal and interest on subordinated debt, and are subject to the appointment of a receiver or conservator.

Under FDICIA, the FDIC is permitted to provide financial assistance to an insured bank before appointment of a conservator or receiver only if (i) such assistance would be the least costly method of meeting the FDIC's insuranceobligations, (ii) grounds for appointment of a conservator or a receiver exist or are likely to exist, (iii) it is unlikely that the bank can meet all capital standards without assistance and (iv) the bank's management has been competent, has compliedwith applicable laws, regulations, rules and supervisory directives and has not engaged in any insider dealing, speculative practice or other abusive activity.

The Bank is subject to FDIC deposit insurance assessments for the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF"). The FDIC has implemented a risk-based assessment system whereby banks are assessed on a sliding scale depending on their placement in nineseparate supervisory categories. Recent legislation provides that BIF insured institutions, such as the Bank, will share the Financial Corporation ("FICO") bond service obligation. Previously, only Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF") insuredinstitutions were obligated to contribute to the FICO bond service. The BIF deposit insurance premium for the Bank is presently 2.08 cents per $100 of BIF insured deposits.

On April 19, 1995, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted uniform revisions to the regulations promulgated pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act (the "CRA"), which are intended to set standards for financial institutions.The revised regulation contains three evaluation tests: (a) a lending test which will compare the institution's market share of loans in low and moderate income areas to its market share of loans in its entire service area and the percentage of a bank'soutstanding loans to low and moderate income areas or individuals, (b) a services test which will evaluate the provision of services that promote the availability of credit to low and moderate income areas, and (c) an investment test, which will evaluatean institution's record of investments in organizations designed to foster community development, small and minority owned businesses and affordable housing lending, including state and local government housing or revenue bonds. The regulation is designedto reduce the paperwork requirements of the current regulations and provide regulatory agencies, institutions, and community groups with a more objective and predictable manner with which to evaluate the CRA performance of financial institutions. The rulebecame effective on January 1, 1996 when evaluation under streamlined procedures began for institutions with total assets of less than $250 million that are owned by a holding company with total assets of less than $1 billion.

Congress and various federal agencies (including, in addition to the bank regulatory agencies, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice (collectively, the "FederalAgencies") responsible for implementing the nation's fair lending laws have been increasingly concerned that prospective home buyers and other borrowers are experiencing discrimination in their efforts to obtain loans. The Department of Justice has filedsuit against financial institutions which it determined had discriminated, seeking fines and restitution for borrowers who allegedly suffered from discriminatory practices. Most, if not all, of these suits have been settled (some for substantial sums)without a full adjudication on the merits.

On March 8, 1994, the Federal Agencies, in an effort to clarify what constitutes discrimination in lending and to specify the factors the agencies will consider in determining if lending discrimination exists, announced a joint policystatement detailing specific discriminatory practices prohibited under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act. In the policy statement, three methods of establishing discrimination in lending were identified: (a) overt evidence ofdiscrimination, when a lender blatantly discriminates on a prohibited basis, or (b) where there is no showing that the treatment was motivated by intent to discriminate against a person, and (c) evidence of disparate impact, when a lender applies apractice uniformly to all applicants, but the practice has a discriminatory effect on a protected class, even where such practices are neutral on their face and are applied equally, unless the practice can be justified on the basis of business necessity.
**Regulation of the Company. The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Federal Bank Holding Company Act (the "Act") and the Georgia bank holding company law (the "Georgia Act"). As a bank holdingcompany, the Company is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board (the "Board") an annual report and such additional information as the Board may require pursuant to the Act. The Board may also make examinations of the Company and each of itssubsidiaries. Bank holding companies are required by the Act to obtain approval from the Board prior to acquiring, directly or indirectly, ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of a bank.

The Act also prohibits bank holding companies, with certain exceptions, from acquiring more than 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank and from engaging in any nonbanking business (other than a business closelyrelated to banking as determined by the Board) or from managing or controlling banks and other subsidiaries authorized by the Act or furnishing services to, or performing services for, its subsidiaries without the prior approval of the Board. The Board isempowered to differentiate between activities that are initiated de novo by a bank holding company or a subsidiary and activities commenced by acquisition of a going concern. The Company has no present intention to engage in nonbanking activities.

As a bank holding company, the Company is subject to capital adequacy guidelines as established by the Board. The Board established risk based capital guidelines for bank holding companies effective March 15, 1989. Beginning onDecember 31, 1992, the minimum required ratio for total capital to risk weighted assets became 8 percent (of which at least 4 percent must consist of Tier 1 capital). Tier 1 capital (as defined in regulations of the Board) consists of common andqualifying preferred stock and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and other intangible assets required to be deducted under the Board's guidelines. The Board's guidelines apply on a consolidated basis to bankholding companies with total consolidated assets of $150 million or more. For bank holding companies with less than $150 million in total consolidated assets (such as the Company), the guidelines will be applied on a bank only basis, unless the bankholding company is engaged in nonbanking activity involving significant leverage or has significant amount of debt outstanding that is held by the general public. The Board has stated that risk based capital guidelines establish minimum standards and thatbank holding companies generally are expected to operate well above the minimum standards.

The Company is also a bank holding company within the meaning of the Georgia Act, which provides that, without the prior written approval of the DBF, it is unlawful (i) for any bank holding company to acquire direct or indirectownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank, (ii) for any bank holding company or subsidiary thereof, other than a bank, to acquire all or substantially all of the assets of a bank, or (iii) for any bank holding company to mergeor consolidate with any other bank holding company.

It is also unlawful for any company to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank in Georgia unless such bank has been in existence and continuously operating or incorporated as abank for a period of five years or more prior to the date of application to the DBF for approval of such acquisition. Bank holding companies themselves are prohibited from acquiring another bank until the initial bank in the bank holding company has beenincorporated for a period of twenty-four months.

The Reigle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the "Interstate Banking Act"), subject to certain restrictions, allows adequately capitalized and managed bank holding companies to acquire existing banks acrossstate lines, regardless of state statutes that would prohibit acquisitions by out-of-state institutions. Further, effective June 1, 1998, a bank holding company may consolidate interstate bank subsidiaries into branches and a bank may merge with anunaffiliated bank across state lines to the extent that the applicable states have not "opted out" of interstate branching prior to such effective date. Some states may elect to permit interstate mergers prior to June 1, 1998. The Interstate Banking Actgenerally prohibits an interstate acquisition (other than the initial entry into a state by a bank holding company) that would result in either the control of more than (i) 10% of the total amount of insured deposits in the United States, or (ii) 30% ofthe total insured deposits in the home state of the target bank, unless such 30% limitation is waived by the home state on a basis which does not discriminate against out-of-state institutions. As a result of this legislation, the Company may become acandidate for acquisition by, or may itself seek to acquire, banking organizations located in other states.

The Reigle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 (the "Improvement Act") provides for the creation of a community development financial institutions' fund to promote economic revitalization in communitydevelopment. Banks and thrift institutions are allowed to participate in such community development banks. The Improvement Act also contains (i) provisions designed to enhance small business capital formation and to enhance disclosure with regard to highcost mortgages for the protection of consumers, and (ii) more than 50 regulatory relief provisions that apply to banks and thrift institutions, including the coordination of examinations by various federal agencies, coordination of frequency and types ofreports financial institutions are required to file and reduction of examinations for well capitalized institutions.

Bank holding companies may be compelled by bank regulatory authorities to invest additional capital in the event a subsidiary bank experiences either significant loan losses or rapid growth of loans or deposits. In addition, theCompany may be required to provide additional capital to any additional banks it acquires as a condition to obtaining the approvals and consents of regulatory authorities in connection with such acquisitions.

The Company and the Bank are subject to the Federal Reserve Act, Section 23A, which limits a bank's "covered transactions" (generally, any extension of credit) with any single affiliate to no more than 10% of a bank's capital andsurplus. Covered transactions with all affiliates combined are limited to no more than 20% of a bank's capital and surplus. All covered and exempt transactions between a bank and its affiliates must be on terms and conditions consistent with safe andsound banking practices, and a bank and its subsidiaries are prohibited from purchasing low quality assets from the bank's affiliates. Finally, Section 23A requires that all of a bank's extensions of credit to an affiliate be appropriately secured bycollateral. The Company and the Bank are also subject to Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, which further limits transactions among affiliates. Sections 22(b) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and implementing regulations also prohibit extensionsof credit by a state non-member bank (such as the Bank) to its directors, officers and controlling shareholders on terms which are more favorable than those afforded other borrowers, and impose limits on the amounts of loans to individual affiliates andall affiliates as a group.
**Financial Services Modernization Act. Congress enacted the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act in November, 1999. The Act repeals the prohibition against affiliations between depository institutionsand firms principally engaged in the issue, floatation, underwriting, public sale, or distribution of securities, and it permits the creation of financial holding companies, including by bank holding companies. Under the Act, financial holding companiesare authorized to engage in activities deemed to be "financial" in nature or "incidental" to such activities, as well as "complementary" activities or services which do not present substantial risks. Prior law limited banks and bank holding companies toactivities determined to be "closely related to banking."

The Act applies to the activities of both state and national banks and their affiliates. The Federal Reserve Board ("FRB") will act as the "umbrella regulator" for financial holding companies and state member banks and their activities; however, the FRB will be required to coordinate its activities with the OCC in the case of national banks and the FDIC in the case of state non-member banks.

Bank holding companies satisfying the criteria specified by the Act may become certified as financial holding companies by filing with the FRB. Bank holding companies and their affiliate banks may not participate in such financialaffiliations unless the insured depository institutions are well capitalized and well managed and have satisfactory CRA ratings.

The Act lists various activities that are "financial" in nature and in which financial holding companies may engage, without approval, upon thirty days' notice to the FRB. The listed activities include, among others: (i) underwriting,dealing in or making a market in securities; (ii) insurance underwriting and agency activities; (iii) providing financial, investment and economic advisory services; (iv) insurance company portfolio investment activities; and (v) merchant banking.

The Act further provides that a national bank may control a "financial subsidiary" or hold an interest in a "financial subsidiary" if the subsidiary engages only in activities that are "financial" in nature or incidental to a"financial" activity and in activities that are permitted for national banks to engage in directly, and the subsidiary does not engage in insurance underwriting, real estate development, or merchant banking. A "financial subsidiary" is any company that iscontrolled by one or more insured depository institutions other than a subsidiary that engages solely in activities permitted for national banks or a subsidiary that a national bank is specifically authorized to control by the express terms of a separateFederal statute.

A national bank may engage in these "financial" activities if: (i) the bank and each depository institution affiliate are well capitalized and well managed; (ii) aggregate total consolidated assets of all subsidiaries does not exceedthe lesser of 45% of consolidated total assets of the parent bank or $50 billion; (iii) received OCC approval to engage in the activities; and (iv) satisfies CRA rating requirements.

As for state banks, FDIC regulations continue to provide that state banks have, at a minimum, the same powers as national banks. Subject to the authority, consistent with the Act, of the FRB and the FDIC (as applicable) to regulatevarious activities of state banks, the Act preserves the authority of states to expand the powers of state banks beyond those permitted for national banks. State law inconsistent with the Act is preempted, but state regulatory authorities retainjurisdiction.
**Competition

The banking business is highly competitive. The Bank competes with other commercial banks in its primary service area.

Banks generally compete with other financial institutions through the banking products and services offered, the pricing of services, the level of service provided, the convenience and availability of services, and the degree ofexpertise and the personal manner in which services are offered. The Bank has encountered strong competition from most of the financial institutions in the Bank's primary service area. In the conduct of certain areas of its banking business, the Bank alsocompetes with credit unions, consumer finance companies, insurance companies, money market mutual funds and other financial institutions, some of which are not subject to the same degree of regulation and restrictions imposed upon the Bank. Many of thesecompetitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than the Bank has and offer certain services, such as trust services, that the Bank does not provide presently. Management believes that competitive pricing and personalized serviceprovides it with a method to compete effectively in the primary service area.
**Employees

As of March 1, 2001,the Bank had 17 full-time employees and 2 part-time employees. The Company does not have any employees who are not also employees of the Bank. The Company and the Bank are not parties to any collectivebargaining agreement, and management believes the Bank has good relations with its employees.

 
**ITEM 2.	DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES
On February 4, 1998, the Company entered into a ground lease with M. Milton Robson, one of the Company's directors, for a 40-year ground lease of a 1.3359 acre tract of land located at 3461 Atlanta Highway in the City ofOakwood, Georgia. The tract of land is the site where the Company and the Bank have constructed the main office of the Bank. Upon termination of the lease due to certain defaults by the lessees or normal expiration, the real property improvements (thebuilding) will revert to and become the property of the lessor. Final termination is expected to occur in Summer, 2038, but could occur earlier if lessees default in the payment of rent for three consecutive months or fail to exercise the extension options.

The directors of the Company obtained two appraisals of the proposed site of the bank building and of the ground lease. Both appraisals determined that the rental under the ground lease was reasonable and at market rental rate forcomparable ground leases. Copies of the appraisals, together with the ground lease agreement, were filed with the Department of Banking and the FDIC.

The Company and the Bank constructed a 10,000 square foot, two-story building on the property for the Bank. There are four teller stations inside and four drive through stations. There is also a stand-alone automatic teller machineaccessible by automobile. The cost of construction of the building was approximately $2,060,000. The furniture, fixtures and equipment necessary for operation of the Bank cost approximately $236,000. Construction, equipping and occupancy of the bankbuilding by the Bank occurred on August 30, 1999. These costs were paid out of capital of the Bank provided by the Company from its initial stock offering and when the Bank was originally capitalized. The Bank opened for business on January 4, 1999, in atemporary building located on a portion of the site of the permanent bank building.

In addition, one of the primary components of the Bank's loan portfolio is loans secured by first or second mortgages on real estate. These loans generally consist of commercial real estate loans, construction and developments loans,and residential real estate loans. Loan terms are generally limited to five years or less, although payments are frequently structured on a longer amortization basis. Interest rates are fixed or adjustable, and are more likely to be fixed in the case ofshorter term loans. Management attempts to reduce credit risk in the commercial real estate portfolio by emphasizing loans on owner-occupied office and retail buildings where the loan-to-value ratio, established by independent appraisals, does not exceed85%. In addition, the Bank typically requires personal guarantees of the principal owners of the property backed with a review by the Bank of the personal financial statements of the principal owners. The principal economic risk associated with eachcategory of loans, including real estate loans, is the creditworthiness of the Bank's borrowers. The risks associated with real estate loans vary with many economic factors, including employment levels and fluctuations in the value of real estate. TheBank also originates residential real estate loans for sale into the secondary market. The Bank limits interest rate risk and credit risk on these loans by locking the interest rate for each loan with the secondary investor and receiving the investor'sunderwriting approval prior to originating the loan.
**ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Neither the Company nor the Bank is a party to any pending legal proceedings which management believes would have a material effect upon operations or financial condition.

 
**ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the Company's fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.
**PART II

ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR ISSUER'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
As of December 31, 2001, 878,344 shares were outstanding to approximately 1,300 shareholders. There is no established trading market for the Company's common stock. The Company has not paid and does not anticipate payingdividends on its common stock in the immediate future. At present, the only source of funds from which the Company could pay dividends would be dividends paid to the Company by the Bank. Certain regulatory requirements restrict the amount of dividendsthat can be paid to the Company by the Bank without obtaining the prior approval of the DBF. No assurance can be given that dividends will be declared by the Company, or if declared, what the amount of the dividends will be or whether such dividends, oncedeclared, would continue.

 
**ITEM 6.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION
Information relating to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations appears on pages 31 through 45 of the Company's 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders, and is incorporated by referencein this Form 10-KSB Annual Report.
**ITEM 7.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The consolidated financial statements, notes thereto and independent auditors' report thereon, dated February 8, 2001, appearing on pages 3 through 27 of Company's 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders, are incorporated byreference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report.
**ITEM 8.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There are no disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure.

 
**PART III

ITEM 9.	DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The information concerning directors and executive officers is presented under Identification of Directors and Executive Officers on pages 3 through 5, and under Non-Director Executive Officers of the Bank on page 7, of theProxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held April 30, 2001, which information is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report. In addition, the information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Actshown under Filings under Section 16(a) on page 12 of said Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report. The information in said Proxy Statement discloses that there were no reporting person delinquencies.
** 

ITEM 10.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION**
Executive Compensation is shown under Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers on pages 7 through 9 of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held April 30, 2001, which is incorporated by reference inthis Form 10-KSB Annual Report.
** 

ITEM 11.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners which appears on page 12 of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held April 30, 2001, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report.

Security Ownership of Directors, Nominees, Executive Officers, and Directors and Executive Officers as a group, which appears on pages 9 through 11 of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held April 30, 2001,is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report.
** 

ITEM 12.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with Management, which appears on page 9 of the Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held April 30, 2001, is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report.
** 

ITEM 13.	EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a)	1.	Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of the Company, notes thereto and independent auditors' report thereon, incorporated herein by reference from pages 3 through 27 of the Company's 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders, havebeen filed as Item 7 in Part II of this report and are attached hereto as Exhibit 13.1. 

The Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations of the Company, incorporated by reference from pages 31 through 45 of the Company's 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders, have been filed as Item6 of Part II of this report and are attached hereto as Exhibit 13.2.

 
**2.	Exhibits
Exhibit Numbers

	Sequential

	Page Number

3.1*		Articles of Incorporation					--

3.2*		Bylaws									--

	13.1		Consolidated Financial Statements of

			the Company								20

	13.2		Management's Discussion and Analysis

			of Financial Condition and Results of

			Operations								44

21.1		Subsidiaries of the Company. The

			sole subsidiary of the Company is

			Southern Heritage Bank,

			Oakwood, Georgia, which is 

			wholly-owned by the Company.				--

________________________

*Items 3.1 through 3.2, as listed above, were previously filed by the Company as Exhibits (with the same respective Exhibit Numbers as indicated herein) to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Registration No. 333-47291) andsuch documents are incorporated herein by reference.
** 

(b)	Reports on Form 8-K
No Reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2000.
** **
 
**SIGNATURES**
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 23, 2001.

 
**SOUTHERN HERITAGE BANCORP, INC.**
 

By: s/Tren Watson

	Tren Watson

	President and C.E.O.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 23, 2001.
**	Signature				Title
 

s/Tren Watson				Director; President and C.E.O.

Tren Watson

 

s/Rita Gray 		Chief Financial Officer 

Rita Gray 

 

s/Lowell S. (Casey) Cagle		Director; Chairman

Lowell S. (Casey) Cagle

 

s/C. Talmadge Garrison 	 	Director

C. Talmadge Garrison

 

_________________________		Director

Earl C. Gilleland

 

_________________________		Director 

A. Terry Hayes

 

_________________________		Director

Wm. David Merritt

[SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE]

s/Harold D. Nichols 		Director

Harold D. Nichols

 

s/Edward R. Quillian 			Director

Dr. Edward R. Quillian

 

_________________________		Director

M. Milton Robson

 

s/Donald W. Smith 			Director

Donald W. Smith

 

 

Supplemental Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act by Non-reporting Issuers:

	Not Applicable.

 

 

 ****************************************