alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOARD: Paul C. Aughtry, 111 Chairman Edwin H. Cooper, 111 Vice Chairman Steven G. Kisner Secretary September 18,2009 

# DHEC

PKO.\IOIO PKOIOCT PROSPER

C. Earl Hunter, Commissioner Promotingandprotectingthe health ofthepublic and the environment BOARD: Henry C. Scott M. David Mitchell, MD

Coleman F. Buckhouse,MD

Richard A. Schutt, Chief, 

### Air Planning Branch EPA Region 4 Atlanta Federal Center 

### 6 1Forsyth Street Southwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8909 

### Re: South Carolina Fine Particulate Matter Air Quality ImplementationPlan Dear 

### Mr. Schutt: On July 29,2009, the Department of Health and Environmental Control (Department) submitted a letter to the United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 4, indicating that it had met the obligations to public notice its proposed State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisionsunder sections 1 10(a)(l)and (2) ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA), to address basic SIP requirements, including emission inventories,monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards(NAAQS) for fine particles or PM2.5 (particleswith an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 mircometers). On July 24,2009, a Public Notice was published in the South Carolina State Register providingthe public with the opportunity to request a public hearing on the issue. Pursuant to 40 CFR 5 1.102, no request for a public hearing was received by the close of the 30-day public comment period (August 24,2009), and as a result, the hearing was cancelled. As outlined in the enclosed attachmentsto this letter, the Department is certifyingto the EPA that the "infrastructure" elements pertaining to the 

### Pki2.5 attainment/unclassifiableareas in South Carolina 

### [as required under Section 110(a)(l)and (2) of the CAA] have been addressed. Should you have any further questions concerning South Carolina's fine particulate matter SIP, please feel free to contactMaeve S. R. Mason of my staff at (803) 898-2230 or masonmrO,dhec.sc.gov. 

# WbFb

Robert J. Brown, Jr Director Division of Air ~laKnin~, Development & Outreach Bureau of Air Quality South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

ec: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory Development Section, EPA Region 4 Zuri Farngalo, Environmental Scientist, EPA Region 

### 4 Joel Huey, PM Coordinator, EPA Region 4 cc: Myra C. Reece, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality, SCDHEC Renee Shealy, Assistant Bureau Chief, Bureau of Air Quality, SCDHEC Enclosures: Attachment A: Certification of 

### 1 1O(a)(l) and 

### (2) Requirements Attachment B: SIP SubmittalCompleteness Criteria Checklist Attachment C: State Register Notice of Public Hearing (July 24,2009)

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 2600BullStreet Columbia,SC 29201 Phone: (803) 898-3432 wwwscdhecgov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1746

THOMAS J. SQUIREK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE LAW OFFICES OF SESSOMS & ROGERS, P.A.;

STUART M. SESSOMS, JR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-02-40-1)

Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 20, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas J. Squirek, Appellant Pro Se. E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III,

Joshua Blake Durham, POYNER & SPRUILL, Charlotte, North Carolina;

Stuart M. Sessoms, SESSOMS & ROGERS, P.A., Durham, North Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas J. Squirek appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint against the Law Offices of Sessoms &

Rogers, P.A., and Stuart M. Sessoms, Jr. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Squirek v. Law Offices of

Sessoms & Rogers, P.A., No. CA-02-40-1 (M.D.N.C. May 5, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 00823**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 00823\00823_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 00823\00823_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 00823\00823_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 00823\00823_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00823\00823_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00823\00823_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00823\00823_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 00823\00823_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 00823\Certification Statement Plant ID 00823.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 00823\Supplemental Documents\00823_2010-09-15 Effluent Guidelines Certification.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 00823\Supplemental Documents\00823_PartA_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00823\Supplemental Documents\00823_PartA_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 00823\Supplemental Documents\00823_PartA_WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
# C_2013129EN.01001902.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2013 — Bimbo v OHIM — Café do Brasil (Caffè KIMBO)

(Case T-277/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Caffè KIMBO - Earlier national word mark BIMBO - Relative grounds for refusal - Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 129/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bimbo, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Café do Brasil SpA (Melito di Napoli, Italy) (represented by: M. Mostardini, G. Galimberti and F. Melluci, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 May 2012 (Case R 1017/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Bimbo, SA and Café do Brasil SpA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bimbo, SA, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bimbo, SA, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.

1

---
----

**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Thomas C. Shrake, certify that: 

 1.               I  have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Pacific Rim Mining Corp. (the  “Company”); 

 2.               Based  on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of  a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not  misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; 

 3.               Based  on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included  in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,  the periods presented in this Report; 

 4.               The  Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing  and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act  Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have: 

 a)               Designed  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls  and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material  information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the  period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 b)               Evaluated  the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this  annual report based on such evaluation; and 

 c)               Disclosed  in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter  (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,  the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 5.               The  Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  Company’s auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of  directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 a)               All  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and  report financial information; and 

 b)               Any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees  who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial  reporting.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm

The Hackett Group,
Inc.

Miami, Florida

We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87749 and 333-32342) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69951, 333-90635, 333-39460, 333-64542, and 333-108640) of The Hackett Group, Inc. of our reports dated
February 24, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of The Hackett Group, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ BDO USA, LLP 
Miami, Florida
|February 24, 2012
No. 48822.

#### Protests 14033-K, etc., of Chan & Chan et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.(A Development Stage
Company) Exhibit 32.1 Certification
by the President pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection
with the Annual Report of Sibling Entertainment Group, Inc. (the Company) on
the Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mitchell
Maxwell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i)the Report
filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii)The
information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates
and for the periods presented therein. SIBLING ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.Date: October
  23, 2006
  By:
  /s/  Mitchell MaxwellMitchell
  MaxwellPresident
  & Chief Executive Officer This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. 33
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Will Rogers Air National Guard Base saves thousands of dollars with basewide LED replacements

By Staff Sgt. Kasey M. Phipps137th Special Operations Wing Public Affairs

                WILL ROGERS AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, Okla.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 137th Special Operations Wing website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

137th Special Operations WingLEDLED lightinggreen productsenergy savingsenvironmental and sustainable programs137th Special Operations Civil Engineering SquadronWill Rogers Air National Guard Base
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ben Jamil, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Chris R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

   Date:  May 8, 2006                                /s/ Ben Jamil
                                                     -------------
                                                     Ben Jamil
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


   Date:  May 8, 2006                                /s/ Chris R. Decker
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Chris R. Decker
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



                                       23
# C_2015007EN.01002701.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2014 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaïki Dynamiki v Europol

(Cases T-40/12 and T-183/12) (1)

1

((Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of information technology services relating to a document management system and a corporate Intranet portal - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Obligation to state reasons - Equal treatment - Transparency - Proportionality - Non-contractual liability))

(2015/C 007/30)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Ettelbrück, Luxembourg) and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos and S. Paliou, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: J. Teal and T. de Maignas, acting as Agents, P. Anestis, lawyer, C. Kennedy-Loest, Solicitor, N. Pourbaix and D. Vallindas, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

In Case T-40/12, an application for annulment of Europol’s decision of 22 November 2011 rejecting the bid tendered by the applicants in connection with Call for Tenders D/C3/1104 concerning the provision of an enterprise content management system (management of documents, records, and business processes) and a corporate Intranet portal (OJ 2011/S 134-222044), and, in Case T-183/12, first, an application for annulment of Europol’s decision to grant the public service contract in respect of the call for tenders referred to above to another tenderer and, secondly, an application for compensation for the loss sustained as a result of the loss of opportunity for the applicants to be granted that public service contract.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that Cases T-40/12 and T-183/12 be joined for the purposes of judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that Cases T-40/12 and T-183/12 be joined for the purposes of judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Police Office (Europol). |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Police Office (Europol).

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Indo-Pacific employee recognized as DLA Security Professional of the Year

By John HamiltonDLA Indo-Pacific Chief of Staff

                Pearl Harbor, Hawaii  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA IntelligenceDLA Security Professional of the YearOPSECINFOSECPersonnel SecurityIndustry Security
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Richard Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of
Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: November 9, 2006



|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/s/ Richard Davidson         
|Richard Davidson             
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)