alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(LOGO)

PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP

Report of Independent Accountants

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
650 Third Avenue South
Park Building
Suite 1300
Minneapolis MN 55402-4333
Telephone (612) 596 6000
Facsimile (612) 373 7160

March 22, 1999

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of Residential Funding Corporation

We have examined management's  assertion about Residential Funding Corporation's
(the "Company")  compliance with their minimum servicing standards in their role
as Master  Servicer as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1998  included in
the accompanying management assertion. Such assertions were examined relating to
those  mortgage  loans  included in the listing of mortgage  loans and series of
certificates  included in  the attached  Exhibit 1. Our  testing procedures were
applied only to the series of certificates  serviced on or before  September 30,
1998.  Direct  servicing  functions  are  performed  by  various   subservicers.
Management  is  responsible  for the  Company's  compliance  with their  minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's compliance with their
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  Loans and series of  certificates
subject  to  such   procedures  were  selected  using  sampling   methods,   and
accordingly,  we make no  representation  that our  examination  procedures were
performed on a specific loan or series of certificates as listed in the attached
Exhibit 1. We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with their minimum servicing standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0883-19

MATTHEW JOHN ARMINDARIZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE EASTLAND COURT OF APPEALS

ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J.,

joined.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. In the bill

of costs, the trial court assessed Appellant a $25 time payment fee. See TEX. LOCAL

GOV’T CODE § 133.103. On appeal, the Court of Appeals struck a portion of that fee as
MATTHEW JOHN ARMINDARIZ - 2

being unconstitutional. Armindariez v. State, No. 11-19-00021-CR (Tex. App.–Eastland

August 15, 2019).

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review arguing that the time

payment fee was prematurely assessed. We recently handed down our opinion in Dulin v.

State, Nos. PD-0856-19 & PD-0857-19, 2021 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 273 (Tex. Crim.

App. Mar. 31, 2021), in which we held that the time payment fee was assessed

prematurely because the pendency of appeal suspends the obligation to pay court costs.

Accordingly, we grant ground one of the State’s petition for discretionary review,

vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of

Appeals for proceedings consistent with this opinion. The State’s other ground is

refused.

DATE DELIVERED: May 12, 2021

DO NOT PUBLISH
Before the Third Division,

April 6, 1942

No. 47041.

#### Protest 35894-K of M. Pressner & Company (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise in question consists of Rockingham earthenware similar to that involved in *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303). In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 210 was sustained.
No. 96-7915.

#### Johnson *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA director spurs audit advancement team

By Chris Erbe

In August 2016 independent public accountant Ernst & Young began work to conduct DLA’s first audit. In June 2017, the IPA announced its intent to issue a disclaimer of opinion on DLA’s fiscal 2017 working capital fund, general fund and transaction fund financial statements, a result not unexpected for agencies undergoing a first-year audit.

DLA hopes to show major improvement in fiscal 2018 for high-priority areas identified in the audit. The goal is to achieve unmodified opinions in the transactional fund by fiscal 2020; the general fund by 2023; and the working capital fund by 2025.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

auditauditorIPAOIGreal propertyinventoryfinancialFIAR
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0131 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JONATHAN JAMES,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 2 3, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 13 2023

02/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0131
Author: Abt Associates Inc.

Date Created:

Date Modified: 5/26/2011

Purpose: This file lists all facilities that are located in Marine Protected areas. This information is used 

in the MPA analysis in the Executive Order chapter.

File Contents:

Worksheet Contents

Selected_Facs Contains a list of every facilities (determined in MPA_Inventory_GIS_Database_Table.xls) 

that is located in a Marine Protected Area

The original version of this file contains, or is linked to a file that contains, confidential business 

information (CBI), or information that could be used to reveal CBI. As a result, the values for any 

variables determined by EPA to be CBI, or that could be used to reveal CBI, have been concealed.
FID_ SurveyID Facility_T Phase Lat Long_ State Region Water_Type

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 3

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 3

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2
Count of Region

Region Total

CAL 2

GL 9

INL 23

MA 44

Mex 10

NA 20

SA 10

Grand Total 118
FID_ SurveyID Facility_T Phase Lat Long_ State Region Water_Type

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Manufacturer 3

Manufacturer 3

Manufacturer 3

Generator 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Manufacturer 3

Manufacturer 3

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Generator 2

Manufacturer 3

Generator 3

Generator 2

Generator 2
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 00823

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 00823\00823_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

00823\00823_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

00823\00823_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 00823\00823_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00823\00823_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00823\00823_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00823\00823_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 00823\00823_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

00823\Certification Statement Plant ID 00823.pdf Plant certification statement

00823\Supplemental Documents\00823_2010-09-15 Effluent Guidelines Certification.pdfPlant submitted supplemental files to the survey

00823\Supplemental Documents\00823_PartA_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00823\Supplemental Documents\00823_PartA_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 00823\Supplemental Documents\00823_PartA_WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION






<PAGE>



                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of 30DC,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ending  March 31,  2014 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Edward Dale,  Principal
Executive Officer,  President, and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 USC section  1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 14, 2014


/s/ Edward Dale
------------------------------------------------------------------
Edward Dale,
Principal Executive Officer, President and Chief Executive Officer

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 53292.

#### “21” Brands, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 113758-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
No. 44321.

#### Protests 843749-G, etc., of Tucker & Goodheart (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods',, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
No. 47004.

#### Protest 47075-K of William Barnet & Son (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It appeared that the entry was liquidated on August 6, 1940, and the protest dated October 21, 1940, was filed with the collector at Albany on October 22, 1940. In view of section 514 it was held that the court was without jurisdiction in this case since the protest was not filed within 60 days *477of the date of liquidation. In accordance therewith the defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted.
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a)
      and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
      of the undersigned officers of Canal Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries,
      a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

      The Quarterly  Report of Form 10-Q for the nine months ended July 31, 2005
      (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the  requirements  of
      section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and
      information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


Date: September 13, 2005                     /S/ Michael E. Schultz
                                             -----------------------
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 13, 2005                     /S/ Reginald Schauder
                                             -----------------------
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       46
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the PBSJ Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ John B. Zumwalt III  
|                       |  |  |  | John B. Zumwalt          
|                       |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer  

|                       |  |  |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald J. Vrana                 
|                       |  |  |  | Donald J. Vrana                     
|                       |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012379EN.01003603.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/36

---

Action brought on 17 October 2012 — ZZ v Europol

(Case F-121/12)

2012/C 379/63

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Europol

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annul the decision of Europol not to renew the applicant’s contract for an unlimited duration and order Europol to pay the applicant the difference between the remuneration to which the applicant would have been entitled had she remained in her post at Europol and any other compensation actually received by her since 15 April 2012.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision taken by the defendant on 20 December 2011 by which it informed the applicant that her fixed-term contract expiring on 14 April 2012 would not be renewed; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision taken by the defendant on 20 December 2011 by which it informed the applicant that her fixed-term contract expiring on 14 April 2012 would not be renewed;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant the difference between (i) the remuneration to which she would have been entitled had she remained in her post at Europol and (ii) the amount of remuneration, fees, unemployment benefits and any other compensation actually received by her since 15 April 2012 by way of replacement for the remuneration she was receiving as a temporary agent; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant the difference between (i) the remuneration to which she would have been entitled had she remained in her post at Europol and (ii) the amount of remuneration, fees, unemployment benefits and any other compensation actually received by her since 15 April 2012 by way of replacement for the remuneration she was receiving as a temporary agent;

| — | order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay the costs.

---
Exhibit 32

Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the PBSJ Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                          |  |  |  |                                                  
| |  | ------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | Date: September 21, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ John B. Zumwalt III                          
| |  |                          |  |  |  | John B. Zumwalt III                              
| |  |                          |  |  |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                          | 
| |  | Date: September 21, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald J. Vrana                              
| |  |                          |  |  |  | Donald J. Vrana                                  
| |  |                          |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

February 6, 1940

No. 43196.

#### Protests 8025-K, etc., of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the record presented and in view of T. D. 49984 the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1402 was sustained.
# C_2014009EN.01002902.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/29

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 October 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-57/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Disability allowance - Deduction of the amount of the debt owed to an institution - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any basis in law)

2014/C 9/48

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decisions to reduce the amount of the applicant’s disability allowance for the months June to September 2011, for payment of interest at the rate of 15 % and payment of the sum of EUR 500.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed on the basis that it is in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any basis in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed on the basis that it is in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any basis in law.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the interim proceedings in Cases F-57/12 R and T-464/12 P(R). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the interim proceedings in Cases F-57/12 R and T-464/12 P(R).

| 3. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay to the General Court the sum of EUR 2 000. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay to the General Court the sum of EUR 2 000.

---

(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012, p. 37.

1

---
No. 48192.

#### Protests 843704-G (B), etc., of Davis & Geck, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.