alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# February 2019 New Employee Orientation 

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime hosted New Employee Orientation Feb. 27 - 28 welcoming 11 new associates ranging from police officers and purchasing agents to a public affairs specialist.

New employees ended the session with a tour of the base. 

If you see new faces around the installation, please be sure to welcome them to DLA Land and Maritime. 

The next New Employee Orientation is March 27 - 28 in the Building 20 Buckeye Room at 9 a.m. 

 New associates to DLA Land and Maritime and from all local DLA hosted tenants, military and interns are welcome to attend.

To register, please contact the Program Manager.  

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Building Connections L&MCulture L&Mnew employee L&MResource the Enterprise L&MPACER/Intern L&MDLA L&M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW129550]


Wyoming: Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and 
Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement from Dominion Exploration & Production, Inc. 
for competitive oil and gas lease WYW129550 for land in Johnson County, 
Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the 
rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. 
Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease WYW129550 effective July 1, 2006, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the 
lands.

Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
 [FR Doc. E7-9637 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
EXHIBIT 10.18

AMENDMENT 1 TO

THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY

2001 DIRECTOR OPTION PLAN

DATED JANUARY 23, 2007

The McClatchy Company 2001 Director Option Plan, amended and restated as of December 4, 2002 (the Plan), is hereby amended as follows,
effective January 23, 2007:



| | 1. | Paragraph (a) of Section 10 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end thereof:
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of any distribution to the Companys shareholders of securities of any other entity or other assets
(including, without limitation, an extraordinary cash dividend but excluding regular, periodic cash dividends) without receipt of consideration by the Company, the Company shall proportionately and accordingly adjust the number of Shares covered by
each outstanding Option and/or the price per Share covered by each outstanding Option (but not the aggregate exercise price payable with respect to Shares subject to the unexercised portion of an outstanding Option) to the extent necessary to
reflect such distribution, so that the proportionate interest of the Optionee immediately following such event shall, to the extent practicable, be the same as immediately before such event.



| | 2. | Except as amended above, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The McClatchy Company has executed this Amendment 1 to the Plan in Sacramento,
CA, as of this 23rdday of January, 2007.



THE MCCLATCHY COMPANYBy:

/s/ Karole Morgan-PragerName:

Karole Morgan-PragerTitle:

VP, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary




|                   |  | 
|------------------ |  | 
|ATTEST:           
|                  
|/s/ Mylyn McArthur
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS FOR PEI
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001057053
<NAME> PRESTOLITE ELECTRIC HOLDING, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,369
<INVENTORY>                                     49,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,398
<PP&E>                                          81,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,118
<BONDS>                                        131,246
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,056
<SALES>                                        213,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,982
<CGS>                                          172,064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,774)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,417)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,191)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.11)


</TABLE>
# C_2012399EN.01002303.xml

| 22.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/23

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 October 2012 — Saobraćajni institut CIP v Commission

(Case T-227/12 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public service contracts - Call for tenders concerning the preparation of technical documentation for a rail modernisation project - Exclusion of the applicant from participation in the tender procedure - Annulment of the tender procedure after the action had been brought - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 399/45

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Saobraćajni institut CIP d.o.o. (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: A. Lojpur, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and E. Georgieva, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for, essentially, interim measures ordering the suspension of the tender procedure in the context of the contract notice published on 3 April 2012 concerning the preparation of technical documentation for a rail modernisation project and excluding the applicant from participating in the tender procedure.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.

| 2. | The European Commission shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall pay the costs.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# DLA Land: Driving Readiness

DLA Video Production

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
From foxhole to factory, DLA Land is your single point of contact in the Defense Logistics Agency for Land support. We support you with demand planning for repair parts, requisition support and more. Our customer service representatives are located around the world to ensure you have the readiness you need to accomplish your mission. 

view in open caption

For more information visit: http://www.dla.mil/LandandMaritime/Business/Customer-Support/LandCustomers/

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Video L&MDLA L&MLand L&MDetachments L&MForward L&M
ENCLOSURE 3

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION RECORD

The complete record of public participation activities is located at the Air Division of the 

Department of Environmental Quality. The department contact to access this 

information is the Director, Air Division.

The state did not receive comments on this particular revision.

TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REG03-pc

SIP\NONATTN PLANS\2015\H13-SIP-3.DOC
#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6551.

Entry No. N-297, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, November 20, 1941, etc.

Certified November 24, 1941, etc.

Entered at Newark, N. J., December 22, 1941, etc.

(Decided November 25, 1946)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decisioD upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (¡d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSCAR O. PINEDA, a.k.a. Oscar Orlando

Pineda,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73610

Agency No. A094-203-281

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2010** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Oscar O. Pineda, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s removal order and denying his motion to reopen. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

FILED

DEC 27 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73610

denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo questions. Mohammed v.

Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Pineda’s motion to reopen

because his conviction for possession of cocaine base for sale, in violation of Cal.

Health & Safety Code § 11351.5, is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1101(a)(43)(B), and he is therefore ineligible for cancellation of removal. See

8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1); Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 975-76 (9th Cir. 2008).

Pineda’s contention regarding the burden of proof is not persuasive. See

8 C.F.R. § 1240.8(d).

Because Pineda has not contested removability under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1182(a)(6)(A)(i), we need not address his contentions regarding his removability

under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) or (II).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2014292EN.01003901.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — National Iranian Oil Company v Council

(Case T-578/12) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Action for annulment - Infra-State body - Standing to bring proceedings - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Indication and choice of legal basis - Powers of the Council - Principle of foreseeability of European Union acts - Meaning of providing support to nuclear proliferation - Manifest error of assessment - Rights of the defence and right to effective judicial protection - Proportionality - Right to property))

2014/C 292/47

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: National Iranian Oil Company (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: J.-M. Thouvenin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and M. Bishop, agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and M. Konstantinidis, agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 58) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 of 15 October 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 16).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders National Iranian Oil Company to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders National Iranian Oil Company to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Minera México, S.A. de C.V. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xavier García de Quevedo Topete, President and General Director of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: July 14, 2004 |  |     |                                                                                                              
|------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | By: | /s/XAVIER GARCÍA DE QUEVEDO TOPETEName: Xavier García de Quevedo Topete
Title: President and General Director

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Minera México, S.A. de C.V. and will be retained by Minera
México, S.A. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

---
# C_2012165EN.01003101.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/31

---

Action brought on 2 April 2012 — Schulze v OHIM — NKL (Klassiklotterie)

(Case T-155/12)

2012/C 165/52

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hans Gerd Schulze (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: K. Lodigkeit, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: NKL Nordwestdeutsche Klassenlotterie (Hamburg)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | set aside the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 30 January 2012 (Appeal R 600/2011-4), in so far as that decision refused registration of the mark ‘Klassiklotterie’; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 30 January 2012 (Appeal R 600/2011-4), in so far as that decision refused registration of the mark ‘Klassiklotterie’;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘Klassiklotterie’ for goods and services in Classes 28, 35 and 41 (Application No 8 554 354).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: NKL Nordwestdeutsche Klassenlotterie.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark ‘NKL-Klassiklotterie’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 35 and 41 (Mark No 2 904 650).

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, as there is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

---