alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stern Bros. *v.*United States

No. 6533.

Entry No. 718981/4, etc.

Invoices dated Holmfirth, England, August 20, 1941, etc.

Certified August 21, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 9, 1941, etc.

(Decided November 19, 1946)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The agreed set of facts, embodied in the stipulation of submission, establish that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values of the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14

Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Amended

(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Noel J. Guillama, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Quantum Group, Inc. for the quarter ended January 31, 2007;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.





Date: March 26, 2007



/s/Noel J. GuillamaNoel J. Guillama

President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 45276.

#### Protest 27160-K of General Dyestuff Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the mixture in question was held dutiable at 1.50 cents per pound under section 702, Revenue Act of 1938, on the weight of the contested item.
No. 74-706.

No. 74-738.

#### Pacelli *v.*United States; and Mallah *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari in No. 74-706.

Reported below: 503 F. 2d 971.
No. 47043.

#### Protest 62655-K of Person & Wiedhorn (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Prom an examination of the papers the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Women's Jobs: Advance and Growth

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Women's Jobs: Advance and Growth : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 232*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1949,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5505,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 96-7027.

#### Mathewson *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9645]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    This is notice that on March 7, 2007, Penick Corporation, 33 
Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration 
as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in 
schedule II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coca Leaves (9040).........................  II
Raw Opium (9600)...........................  II
Poppy Straw (9650).........................  II
Concentrate of Poppy Straw (9670)..........  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the listed controlled substances to 
manufacture bulk controlled substance intermediates for sale to its 
customers.
    As noted in a previous notice published in the Federal Register on 
September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745), all applicants for registration to 
import a basic class of any controlled substances in schedule I or II 
are, and will continue to be required to demonstrate to the Deputy 
Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 
21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), 
(e) and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: May 10, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-9645 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-83763) pertaining to the Employee Stock Options held by
Michael P. Wallis; Form S-8 (No. 333-83829) pertaining to the IVI Checkmate
Electronics, Inc. 401(K) Plan; Form S-8 (No. 333-32366) pertaining to the
Plourde Computer Services, Inc. 1996 Key Management Stock Option Plan; Form S-8
(No. 333-32382) pertaining to the Employee Stock Options held by R. Lee Paulson;
Form S-8 (No. 333-65749) pertaining to the Plourde Computer Services, Inc. 1991
Stock Option Plan; Form S-8 (No. 333-65259) pertaining to the IVI Checkmate
Corp. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the IVI Checkmate Corp. Amended and
Restated 1998 Directors Stock Option Plan; the Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to
the Form S-4 Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-53629) pertaining to
the Checkmate Electronics, Inc. 1988 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan,
Checkmate Electronics, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan, Checkmate Electronics, Inc.
1994 Director's Stock Option Plan, International Verifact Inc. 1997 Stock Option
Plan and Checkmate Electronics, Inc. Non-Incentive Stock Option Agreement; and
the Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to the Form S-4 Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-53629), pertaining to the registration of shares of common
stock for issuance upon the exchange of exchangeable shares, of our report dated
February 18, 2000, except for Note 14, as to which the date is February 22,
2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IVI Checkmate
Corp. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1999.

                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2000
```

[115th Congress Public Law 223]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1562]]

Public Law 115-223
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   4558 Broadway in New York, New York, as the ``Stanley Michels Post 
        Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 30, 2018 -  [S. 2692]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STANLEY MICHELS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4558 Broadway in New York, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Stanley Michels Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stanley 
Michels Post Office Building''.

    Approved July 30, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2692:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            June 28, considered and passed Senate
            July 16, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  About DLA
  News
  News Article View
 Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 Complex geometry By Steve Stark
                Army AL&T Magazine
 A YOUNG FIELD                    THE TRAINING QUESTION                MATERIALS SCIENCE            THE ADDITIVE EQUATION                    FROM DUST IT CAME                            THE ADDITIVE SWEET SPOT                  CONCLUSION                For more information on the Army’s additive center of excellence, view the story on DVIDS.  STEVE STARK is senior editor of Army AL&T magazine. He holds an M.A. in creative writing from Hollins University and a B.A. in English from George Mason University. In addition to more than two decades of editing and writing about the military and S&T, he is the best-selling ghostwriter of several consumer health-oriented books and an award-winning novelist. He is Level II certified in program management.    Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command website.
 SHARE
 PRINT
  Development and Engineering Center 3D printing Additive Manufacturing Army Research Laboratory Army Tank Automotive Research Aviation and Missile Research parts
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### Served: February 25, 2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC 

### NATIONAL AIR CARGO GROUP, INC. NOTICE OF DEREGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME On February 12, 2015, National Air Cargo Group, Inc. d/b/a National Airlines (''National"), a U.S. certificated air carrier,1 

### requested that the Department deregister the trade name "Murray Air" stating that itno longer intends to use the name in its operations. We acknowledge National's request and deregister the trade name "Murray Air" effective immediately. Dated atWashington, D.C., February 25, 2015.

TODD M. HOMAN 

### Director Office ofAviation Analysis An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

1 National's interstate certificate was lastreissued by Order 2011-7-15, on July 29, 2011.

### Attachment A SERVICE LIST FORNATIONAL AIR CARGO GROUP, INC.

PIERRE MURPHY COUNSEL FOR NATIONAL AIR CARGO INC SUITE 590 1200NEWHAMPSHIRE AVENUENW WASHINGTON DC 20036

PETERLYNCH ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FORENFORCEMENT FAA/AGC-300 800 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE SW WASHINGTON DC 20591
LUTHERJ HIPPS PRINCIPAL OPERATIONS INSPECTOR ORLANDO FSDO 5950 HAZELTINENATIONAL DRIVE SUITE 500 CITADEL INTERNATIONAL ORLANDO FL 32822 OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36 1200NEW JERSEY AVENUE SE WASHINGTON DC 20590

MARKMAZOR CERTIFICATION MANAGER FAAAFS-900 45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131 DULLES VA 20166
(Reap. Dec. 9636)

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. (Queen City Wreath Co.) v. United States

Entry Nos. 577; 664.

(Decided March 22, 1960)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement are limited to the merchandise enumerated on the invoices from Fuku-shima Celluloid Works, Ltd., Japan.

Stipulated facts, upon which the appeals for reappraisement are before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is the invoice unit prices, net, packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2012184EN.01002501.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/25

---

Action brought on 26 March 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-42/12)

2012/C 184/54

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the proposal to transfer pension rights acquired before entry into service with the Commission on the basis of the calculation taking into account the new GIP entering into force after the application for transfer by the applicant.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 14 December 2011 rejecting the applicant’s complaint and requiring the application of the GIP and the actuarial rates in force when she applied to transfer her pension rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 14 December 2011 rejecting the applicant’s complaint and requiring the application of the GIP and the actuarial rates in force when she applied to transfer her pension rights;

| — | If necessary, annul the PMO proposal of 1 August 2011 applying the actuarial values resulting from the new GIP; |
| --- | --- |

—

If necessary, annul the PMO proposal of 1 August 2011 applying the actuarial values resulting from the new GIP;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
No. 96-7535.

#### Bentsen *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 15

- 00149

- CR

JAMES E. GUZMAN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County.

(Tr. Ct. No. 1974171 ).

TO THE COUNTY CRIMINAL COUR T AT LAW NO. 4 OF HARRIS COUNTY,

GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 23rd day of June 2015 , the case upon appeal to revise or to

reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

The cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from

the judgment signed by the court below on January 15, 2015.

After inspecting the record of the court below, it is the opinion

of this Court that it has no jurisdict ion over the appeal. It is

therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED

that the appeal be dismissed.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.Judgment rendered June 23 , 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisti ng of Justices

Jennings, Bland, and Brown.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

September 4, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
Before the Second Division,

October 29, 1942

No. 47686.

#### Protest 86482-K of Rodier Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the items in question consist of mufflers' the same as those involved in Abstract 45938. In accordance therewith the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 was sustained as to those items.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0208 SAT Date: 1/18/2013 Print Date: 4/1/2013

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR/CORROSION, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS-DERMAL/RESPIRATORY, AQUATOX-A,C
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0200-09 FATE: Estimations for MW 441 Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 5.01 (E) S = Disp. / 1.38 mg /L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.86 (E)log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.82 (E) POTW removal (%) = 75-90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strong PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation and p ossible corrosion based on the and concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on cationic binding to lung tissues and the surfactant properties of the PMN material. There is also uncertain concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization based on smaller . Moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 3.6 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.54 green algal 96-h EC50 0.27 fish

_ chronic value 0.096 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.057

algal

_ chronic value 0.11
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for with molecular weight adjustment; SAR chemical class = ; MW 494; liquid; log Kow = 4.17 (EPI); S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 6

SARs includes molecular weight adjuxtment SAR Class Ecotox CategoryEcotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones