alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 16 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 16

       To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Choice Restoration Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    (a) In General.--The following Acts, and the amendments made by 
such Acts, are repealed:
            (1) The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public 
        Law 111-148).
            (2) The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 
        2010 (Public Law 111-152).
    (b) Effect of Law.--The provisions of law amended by the Acts 
referred to in subsection (a) are restored as if such Acts had never 
been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
#### Davis Sportswear, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Parker, Duryee, Benjamin, Zunino & Malone et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 12, 1966.

*Davis Polk Wardwell Sunderland $ Kiendl (S. Hazard Gillespie*of counsel), for defendants. *Lester A. Lazarus*for plaintiff.

*78Abraham N. Geller, J.

Motion by defendants for an order pursuant to CPLR 8301 (subd. [b]) directing plaintiff to pay them for the “ reimbursement ” of a stated sum to a witness, is denied without prejudice to a plenary action, if the witness be so advised. The sum requested, $544, represents the witness’ expenses and loss sustained in attendance and travel to New York in response to plaintiff’s motion to take his deposition as a witness.

After plaintiff’s motion for the deposition out of the State was made, defendants and the witness agreed with plaintiff’s attorney that the motion be withdrawn and arrangements were made for the witness to come to New York to have his examination taken here. It is claimed that plaintiff’s attorney, without proper advance notice, left a message that he had been called out of town and would be obliged to adjourn the examination. The witness was already then in New York.

Disbursements in an action are taxable only in favor of a party and only in accordance with statute. CPLR 8301 enumerates the taxable disbursements. CPLR 8301 (subd. [b]) provides that the court may allow any party to tax, with respect to a motion, his reasonable and necessary expenses of that motion. While CPLR 8301 (subd. [a], par. 12) provides in an omnibus clause for taxability of “ such other reasonable and necessary expenses * * * by order of the court”, this has reference to expenses of a party and now authorizes the court in a proper case to order taxation of such expenses of a party as are not embraced in the enumerated subdivisions. None of these provisions, however, permits taxation of a witness’ expenses incurred because of some alleged wrongful act on the part of the party or attorney requesting or requiring his appearance.

The disbursements here requested are those of a witness. The only provision in CPLR for a witness subpoenaed is that set forth as to attendance and mileage fees in CPLR 8001. While the parties dispute the underlying facts, this application cannot be granted for lack of any authority therefor.
#### Gem Starstone Corporation *v.*United States

No. 6073.

Invoice dated Wembly Park, Middlesex, England, November, 1943.

Certified November 1943.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 17, 1943.

Entry No. 718058.

(Decided November 28, 1944)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been filed pursuant tó the importer’s receipt of the collector’s “notice TO IMPORTER OF ADVANCE IN VALUE UPON APPRAISEMENT,” Stating that the appraised value exceeds the entered value by “3%.”

The official papers in the casé establish that the merchandise was invoiced at certain prices which included postage, package, and insurance; that on entry the importer deducted the items of postage and insurance as nondutiable charges; that the notation of the examiner ,on the consular invoice reads “Apprsd. at invoice units of .value plus pkg.”; and that the report of the appraiser on the summary sheet is by a check mark in the column headed “Appraised,” indicating that the appraisement was “as entered.”

*412Inasmuch as the appraiser’s official action was an acceptance of the entered values, clearly the collector’s notice of appraisement was error. *(James Loudon & Co. for Wm. H. Floyd & Co.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 5731).

Before me, the parties stipulated and agreed that the correct dutiable values were the entered values.

I therefore find the correct dutiable values of the involved merchandise to be the entered values thereof.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Peoples Financial Services Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Scott A. Seasock, Senior, Vice President, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





/s/ Scott A. Seasock

Senior Vice President

(Principal Financial Officer)





Date: March 16, 2011
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 86th MXG: Getting aircraft in the air

By Airman 1st Class D. Blake Browning86th Airlift Wing Public Affairs

                RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Ramstein Air Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Ramstein Air Base86th Maintenance Squadronaircraft partspartsrepair
Exhibit 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Security Instruments,
Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission and to which this  Certification is
an exhibit (the "Report"),  the undersigned hereby certify,  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein.


Date: August 14, 2006                          /s/ Harvey B. Grossblatt
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Harvey B. Grossblatt
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                               /s/ James B. Huff
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               James B. Huff
                                               Chief Financial Officer
No. 45231.

#### Protests 845932-G, etc., of American Import Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of trays the same as those the subject of Abstract 39482. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0242

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JOURNEY RYDER JOHN WIENKE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, Court 

Reporter Kendra A. Steppler is granted an extension of time to and 

including October 1, 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve the 

transcripts requested on appeal.

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 3 2020

08/03/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0242
99-0591 (La. 4/23/99)

#### Michael D. JEANE v. ANCO INSULATIONS, INC.

No. 99-C-0591.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Jeane, Michael D.; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Office of Workers Compensation District 02 Number 97-03687; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CA98-1115

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J. and KIMBALL, J. would grant on attorneys fees and penalties.

JOHNSON, J. not on panel.
EXHIBIT 32.2



      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Annual Report of Nebraska Book Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan G.
Siemek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.



                               /s/ Alan G. Siemek
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Alan G. Siemek
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               June 29, 2007
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Consumer Cooperatives

              																	Flexner, Jean Atherton. 						*Consumer Cooperatives : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1211*,												Washington, D.C.: 								GPO, 										January 1957,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4577,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2009 
 Compensation: Non-employee
directors shall receive the following remuneration: 
  

			
	 Cash retainer
	  	$80,000
	 Lead Director retainer
	  	$25,000
	 Committee fee (non-Audit Committee)
	  	$10,000 per committee
	 Audit Committee fee
	  	$15,000
	 Committee Chair fee (non-Audit Committee)
	  	$20,000
	 Audit Committee Chair fee
	  	$25,000
	 Deferred Stock Payment
	  	$60,000
	 Stock Options
	  	 $55,000 as of the date of grant using a
 Black-Scholes
calculation to determine fair value.


  

 Directors may elect to defer payment of their fees under one or more of the following arrangements: 
  

			
	 Deferred Cash Plan:
	  	Directors may defer cash fees and other cash compensation into a deferred compensation plan. Interest adjusts annually. Amounts deferred are payable after the director leaves the Board either
in lump sum or over time.
		
	 Deferred Stock Plan:
	  	The annual deferred stock payment is automatically placed in the Deferred Stock Plan. Directors may also elect to have all cash fees credited into the Deferred Stock Plan, in which case the
director will receive a 10 percent increase in that compensation. Dividends are credited to the directors’ accounts and reinvested in Company stock. Payouts are in the form of stock, either in lump sum or over time after the director leaves the
Board.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Careers for Women in the Physical Sciences

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Careers for Women in the Physical Sciences : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 270*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1959,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5539,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit10.10

June 15, 2005

AAA Capital ManagementInc. 5051 Westheimer – Suite 2100 Houston, Texas77056

Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato

Re:    Management Agreement Renewal

Dear Mr.Annunziato:

We are writing with respect to your managementagreement concerning the commodity pool to which reference is madebelow (the "Management Agreement"). We areextending the term of the Management Agreement through September 30,2005 and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remainunchanged.

|  |              |                                  |
|--|--------------|----------------------------------|
|  | •  | Smith Barney AAAEnergy Fund L.P. |

Please acknowledge receipt of this modificationby signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention ofMr. Daniel McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. Ifyou have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Verytruly yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

By: /s/Daniel R. McAuliffe Jr.            

Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. Chief FinancialOfficer & Director

By: /s/ AnthonyAnnunziato                   

Print Name:AnthonyAnnunziato        

----
Case No. 14,032.

#### In re TIFFT.

[18 N. B. R. 177.] 1

District Court, E. D. New York.

April 23, 1878.

Bankruptcy — Composition—Examination op Bankrupt.

Where a resolution of composition has been adopted and confirmed by the requisite number of creditors, the right of a creditor to examine the bankrupt under section 5080, Bev. St., is suspended.

[For subsequent proceedings in this litigation, see Cases Nos. 14,033-14.035, and 11 Fed. 4G3.]

[In the matter of Alanson H. Tifft, a bankrupt. See Cases Nos. 14,029-14,031, and 14,-038.]

A. C. Aubrey, for bankrupt.

C. H. Phelps, for creditor.

1

 [Beprinted by permission.]

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is an application on behalf of a creditor who has proved a debt for an examination of the bankrupt, in pursuance of the provisions of Bev. St. § 5080. On the part of the bankrupt the application is opposed, upon the ground that composition proceedings have been instituted and have progressed as far as the second hearing, the resolution of composition having been adopted and confirmed by the requisite number of the creditors.

I am of the opinion that the pendency of the composition proceedings in their present condition is sufficient to suspend the creditor’s right to examine the bankrupt by virtue of •section 5080. If the composition proceedings terminate in a valid composition, any examination of the bankrupt now had would avail nothing. If the composition fails, the examination of the bankrupt can be had with equal effect as if now had. The application must therefore be denied.
EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each person whose signature  appears below  constitutes and appoints George
H.  Fancher  Jr. and Albert A.  Golusin,  and each of them,  his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact   and   agents,   with   full   power  of   substitution   and
resubstitution,  for him in his name,  place and stead,  in his  capacity  as an
officer, director, or both of Fan Energy Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Company"),
to sign the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB,  and any and all amendments
thereto  and to file the same with the United  States  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  granting  unto said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in  person,  hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all that said
attorneys-in-fact  or  agents  or any of them,  or their  or his  substitute  or
substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Signature                                 Title                 Date
---------                                 -----                 ----


/s/ Rex Utsler                            Director              March 24, 1999
    ---------------------------------
    Rex Utsler

/s/ William E. Grafham                    Director              March 24, 1999
    ---------------------------------
    William E. Grafham

/s/ Jeffrey J. Scott                      Director              March 23, 1999
    ---------------------------------
    Jeffrey J. Scott

/s/ George A. Cloudy                      Director              March 24, 1999
    ---------------------------------
    George A. Cloudy