alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Delegation of Authority 301]

                    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State by the laws of the United States, including the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2151*et seq.*), Executive Order 12163 of September 29, 1979, as amended (44 FR 56673), the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962 (22 U.S.C. 2601) the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287*et seq.*) Executive Order 10206 of January 19, 1951, the President's Memorandum Delegation of Authority dated February 16, 1995, the                           ( print page 28545)                        Arms Export Act as amended (22 U.S.C. 2751*et seq.*), Executive Order 11958 of January 18, 1977, and Section 1 of the State Departments Basic Authorities Act. As amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I herby delegate to Henrietta H. Fore, to the extent authorized by law, as functions that have been or may be delegated to the Director of Foreign Assistance.                

Any authority of function covered by this delegation of authority may also be exercised by the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary.

Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to or affected by, this delegation of authority shall be deemed to be such act, executive order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time.

This delegation of authority shall expire upon the designation of an individual to serve as the Director of Foreign Assistance.

                    This delegation of authority shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: May 10, 2007.

Condoleezza Rice,

Secretary of State, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E7-9725 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
Exhibit 32.02   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Ethos Environmental, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel R. Kerker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Daniel R. Kerker By: Daniel R. Kerker Principal Financial Officer  Dated: June 28, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Cenobio CORONADO and Ofelia Coronado, Individually and as Next Friends of their Children Armando Coronado, Alicia Coronado, and Anna Cristina Coronado, Appellants, v. FARMING TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellee.

No. 01-99-00171-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

June 10, 1999.

Harold Eisenman, Houston, for Appellant.

Roger L. McCleary, Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, L.L.P., Houston, TX, E. Michelle Bohreer, Boyar, Simon & Miller, Houston, Tx., for Appellee.

Panel consists of Chief Justice SCHNEIDER and Justices HEDGES and ANDELL.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order signed on June 8, 1998 granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment, which became final when an order was signed on November 13, 1998 severing appellee from the trial court cause. A motion for new trial was timely filed; however, appellants filed their notice of appeal on February 18, 1999, seven days late. *See*Tex.R.App.P. 26.1(a)(1). Appellants did not file a motion for an extension of time to file their notice of appeal. *See*Tex.R.App.P. 26.3.

Although we construe a notice of appeal filed beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1(a)(1), but within the 15-day period allowed under Tex.R.AppP. 26.3, to imply a motion for an extension of time, it is still necessary for an appellant to offer a reasonable explanation for its failure to timely file a notice of appeal. *See Jones v. City of Houston,*976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex.1998) (applying *Verburgt*holding to pauper’s affidavit filed in lieu of appeal bond); *Verburgt v. Dorner,*959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex.1997) (under predecessor rule of rule 26.3, motion for extension of time necessarily implied when appellant acting in good faith files appeal bond within 15-day extension period).

*902Unless within 15 days of the date of this order, appellants file an explanation reasonably explaining their failure to timely file their notice of appeal, this appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. *See Harris v. Borne,*933 S.W.2d 535, 536 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995) (order) (for court to grant extension to perfect appeal, appellant must file the instrument required to perfect appeal and extension motion within the time required by appellate rules); Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a).

It is so ORDERED.
No. 43169.

#### Protest 12123-K of Selsi Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallingee, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of hair hygrometers similar to those the subject of Abstract 42039. The claim at 27)4 percent under paragraph 372 was therefore sustained.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# POL fuel yard gets first major upgrade since 50s

By Airman 1st Class Erick Requadt23d Wing Public Affairs

                MOODY AIR FORCE BASE, Ga.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Moody Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Moody Air Force Baseair combat command23 Wing9th Air ForceConstructionPOLFuel yardfuelPetroleum Oils and Lubricantsequipmentfuel storage23rd Logistics Readiness Squadron
Before the Third Division,

June 11, 1952

No. 56763.

protest 129326-K (New York).

#### Seggerman Nixon Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2
                        CERTIFICATION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth C. Cornelius, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Prestolite Electric Holding, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 19, 2004

/s/ Kenneth C. Cornelius
------------------------
Kenneth C. Cornelius
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### William J. Oberle, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6163.

Invoice dated Hamburg, Germany, May 15, 1936.

Certified May 18, 1936.

Entered at New Orleans, La., June 27, 1936.

Entry No. 3646.

(Decided June 6, 1945)

*Philip Stein*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Specior,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cole, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement of four coils of steel wire rope of different diameters is before me on a motion for dismissal, plaintiff urging such disposition on the ground there was no proper designation and examination of the merchandise within the requirements of section 499 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1499).

No proof, either oral testimony or documentary evidence, was offered to support the motion, plaintiff relying entirely upon the official papers. An examination thereof discloses nothing to disturb the presumptively correct official appraisement, section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1501).

The motion to dismiss is denied. Since there is nothing herein to show values different from the appraised values, the latter are therefore held to be correct for the steel wire rope in question. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 48th LRS enables IAS mission

By Airman 1st Class Christopher S. Sparks48th Fighter Wing Public Affairs

                ROYAL AIR FORCE LAKENHEATH, England   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Royal Air Force Lakenheath website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Royal Air Force Lakenheath493rd Expeditionary Fighter SquadronKeflavik Air BaseIcelandic Air Surveillance48th Logistics Readiness Squadroncargoshipping
No. 54981.

#### John J. Ward *v.*United States,

protest 163871-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Roovers Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 53, C. D. 1190). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
#### Arthur H. Lee & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6525.

Entry No. 740681, etc.

Invoices dated Liverpool, England, January 21, 1946, etc.

Certified January 21, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 26, 1946, etc.

(Decided November 18, 1946)

*John R. Rafter*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1402 (e)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The cited case has been incorporated herein by consent of the parties who further agree on a set of facts, embodied in a written stipulation submitting the present cases, showing export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values are the appraised values of the articles in question, less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 112]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 123 STAT. 3024]]

Public Law 111-112
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To extend the authority for relocation expenses test programs for 
Federal employees, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2009 -  [S. 
                                1825]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5739 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (3);
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by inserting ``or extended'' after ``approved''; 
                and
                    (B) by inserting ``or extension'' after ``of the 
                program'';
            (3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:

    ``(c)(1) <<NOTE: Deadlines. Reports.>> An agency authorized to 
conduct a test program under subsection (a) shall annually submit a 
report on the results of the program to date to the Administrator.

    ``(2) Not later than 3 months after completion of a test program, 
the agency conducting the program shall submit a final report on the 
results of the program to the Administrator and the appropriate 
committees of Congress.'';
            (4) in subsection (d), by striking ``10'' and inserting 
        ``12''; and
            (5) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following:

    ``(e)(1) The Administrator may not approve any test program for an 
initial period of more than 4 years.
    ``(2)(A) Upon the request of the agency administering a test 
program, the Administrator may extend the program.
    ``(B) An extension under subparagraph (A) may not exceed 4 years.
    ``(C) The Administrator may exercise more than 1 extension under 
subparagraph (A) with respect to any test program.''.

[[Page 123 STAT. 3025]]

    (b) <<NOTE: 5 USC 5739 note.>>  Effective Date.--This section shall 
take effect on December 18, 2009.

    Approved November 30, 2009.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1825:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 155 (2009):
            Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate.
            Nov. 16, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
No. 74-999.

#### Bedford Aviation, Inc. *v.*Massachusetts Port Authority.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 221]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1559]]

Public Law 115-221
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
   at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
   Federal Building and United States Courthouse''. <<NOTE: July 27, 
                          2018 -  [S. 2734]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. GEORGE P. KAZEN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
                              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

    Approved July 27, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2734:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            June 7, considered and passed Senate.
            July 16, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Nortel
Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:      May 31, 2005
    /s/ WILLIAM A. OWENSWilliam A. OwensVice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Dated:      May 31, 2005
    /s/ PETER W. CURRIEPeter W. CurrieExecutive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer