alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY 

23 Sep 11

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC-10

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3O

 6500 South MacArthur Blvd (AJW31AF)

 Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

SUBJECT: Renewal of Exemption 7960 (Docket No. FAA-2001-10191)

1. Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Exemption 7960 was granted to the United States 

Air Force on 24 Jan 2003 (renewed as 7960C on 22 Jan 2009) and exempts certain activities of 

the USAF from the provisions of 14 CFR §91.209 (a)(1) and (b). The requirement for the Air 

Force, and other military service’s aircraft participating in approved joint or combined air 

operations, to conduct night vision device (NVD) training with lights out in Military Operating 

Areas (MOA) continues. We request a 3-year extension to this exemption IAW 14 CFR Part 11. 

2. The Air Force respectfully requests additional MOA’s be added to the list of approved areas. 

The list of MOAs to be covered under this exemption is maintained as Attachment 1 to this 

letter. Changes to this list from the previous list include a few additions of new or re-designated 

MOAs.

3. The Air Force will continue to abide by all the terms and conditions of Exemption 7960, as 

amended. These include, but are not limited to: issuing a NOTAM at least 48 hours before the 

lights out operations are to begin; providing annual informational briefings to local flying 

organizations and other civilian users within 100 nautical miles of the MOA airspace; developing 

a letter of agreement with the servicing air traffic control facility; and continuous radar 

monitoring by military personnel to detect all nonparticipating aircraft. As lights out NVD 

operations have been conducted safely by these units since this exemption was granted in 2003, 

the Air Force Flight Standards Agency, on behalf of the Department of the Air Force, requests 

your consideration in granting this request.

3. I may be contacted at (405) 739-9783, e-mail: hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil. Thank you in 

advance for your consideration and assistance.

WILLIAM D. HART, Lt Col, USAF

Chief, Flight Directives Division
ATTACHMENT 1

2011 MOA List for FAA Exemption 7960

* = new or change for 2011

MOA (All subdivisions unless otherwise noted. e.g. Eagle Hi & Lo, 1 & 2, etc.)

Adirondack Galena Pickett

Airburst Gamecock Pike

Avon Gandy Pine Hill

Bagdad Gladden Pinon Canyon

Basinger Goose Powder River

Beaver Hart Red Hills

Birch Hays Reserve

Bison Hill Top Reveille

Bronco Hog (Hi N&S, Lo N&S) Rose Hill

Brownwood Howard Saddle

Brush Creek Jackal Salem

Buckeye Jarbidge Sells

Buffalo Juniper Sevier

Bulldog Kingsville Seymour Johnson

Camden Ridge Lake Andes Smokey

Carthage Lake Placid Snoopy

Cato La Veta (Low) Steelhead

Cheyenne Lindbergh Stony

Condor Lowville Susitna

Cranberry Lucin Taiban

Crypt

Delta*

Marian

Moody

Talon 

Tiger

Desert Morenci Tombstone

DeSoto Mt. Dora Truman

Devils Lake

Dolphin*

Naknek

Olympic

Tupper

Turtle

Duke O’Neill Twelve Mile

Eielson Outlaw Volk

Eureka Owyhee Warrior

Falls Palatka Yankee

Farmville Paradise Yukon

Fox Pecos
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1668 

To provide that the Postal Service may not close any post office which 

results in more than 10 miles distance (as measured on roads with 

year-round access) between any 2 post offices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2011 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. 

WYDEN, and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide that the Postal Service may not close any post 

office which results in more than 10 miles distance (as 

measured on roads with year-round access) between any 

2 post offices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Rural Post 

5 Offices Act of 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1668 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CLOSING OF POST OFFICES. 

2 Section 404(d) of title 39, United States Code, is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this sub5 section, in making any determination under subsection 

6 (a)(3) as to the necessity for the closing or consolidation 

7 of any post office, the Postal Service may not close any 

8 post office which results in more than 10 miles distance 

9 (as measured on roads with year-round access) between 

10 any 2 post offices.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report of Caneum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive officer of the Company,hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 14, 2007
EXHIBIT 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Nortel Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                      
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 10, 2009 |  | /s/    MIKE S. ZAFIROVSKI                            
|                       |  | Mike S. Zafirovski                                   
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                
|                       | 
|Dated: August 10, 2009 |  | /s/    PAVITER S. BINNING                            
|                       |  | Paviter S. Binning                                   
|                       |  | Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and
|                       |  | Chief Restructuring Officer
Attachment 1: 

Timeline for Revised 2008 Lead NAAQS Designation Process

 

1

The CAA states, “By such date as the Administrator may reasonably require, but not later than 1 year after promulgation of a new 

or revised national ambient air quality standard for any pollutant under section 109, the Governor of each State shall (and at any 

other time the Governor of a State deems appropriate the Governor may) submit to the Administrator a list of all areas (or portions 

thereof) in the State, designating as— (i) nonattainment... (ii) attainment... or (iii) unclassifiable...” CAA § 107(d)(1)(A)

2

For the 2nd year of designations, States and Tribes will have an opportunity to update their recommendation letters for the remaining 

areas by October 15, 2010.

Milestone Date

Final Lead NAAQS Rule 

Promulgated

October 15, 2008

(published November 12, 2008)

Monitoring Network 

Implementation

All source-oriented monitors operational by Jan 1, 2010;

All nonsource-oriented monitors operational by Jan 1, 2011.

EPA makes 1

st round (2nd Year)

initial designations for areas with 

sufficient lead data

EPA makes 2

nd round (3rd Year)

initial designations for the 

remaining areas

State/Tribal Designation

Recommendations to EPA

1No later than October 15, 2009 2No later than October 15, 2010

EPA notifies states/tribes 

concerning any modifications to 

their recommendations (120-day 

letters)

No later than June 17, 2010

(120 days prior to final 

designations)

No later than June 17, 2011

(120 days prior to final 

designations)

EPA publishes public notice of 

state/tribes recommendations and 

EPA’s proposed modifications

Late-June 2010

(publication initiates 30-day 

public comment period)

Late-June 2011

(publication initiates 30-day public 

comment period)

End of 30-day public comment 

period Late-July 2010 Late-July 2011

States/tribes submit additional 

information to demonstrate why an 

EPA modification is inappropriate.

No later than Aug 15, 2010 No later than Aug 15, 2011

Final Designations No later than Oct 15, 2010 No later than Oct 15, 2011
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40840 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SEVERN RODGERS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:00-CR-13-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 19, 2001 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Severn Rodgers, Jr., appeals the district court’s imposition of a two-level increase pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(3) forpossession of a sawed-off shotgun. He argues that selfincriminating statements made to the probation officer, which served as the basis of the sentence increase, were protected under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8(a) and should not have been used in determining the applicable guideline range. Rodgers further contends that the error was not harmless because the evidence,No. 01-40840 -2- absent Rodgers’ self-incriminating statement, was not sufficient to support a finding that he possessed a sawed-off shotgun. Rodgers did not object to, nor does he challenge on appeal, the presentence report’s (PSR) finding that a sawed-off shotgun was discovered on the front seat of a stolen vehicle that he was driving. Consequently, there were indicia of reliability in the PSR that prior to the cooperation agreement the probation officer knew that Rodgers possessed a sawed-off shotgun. See United States v. Gibson , 48 F.3d 876, 879 (5th Cir. 1995)(holding that § 1B1.8 was not violated because probation officer relied on information independent of that presented by defendant); United States v. Marsh , 963 F.2d 72, 74-75 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Shacklett , 921 F.2d 580, 584-85 (5th Cir. 1991). Thus, the provisions of § 1B1.8(a) do not apply to restrict the district court’s use of the previously known information regarding the sawed-off shotgun when calculating the offense level. See § 1B1.8(b)(1). Accordingly, Rodgers’ sentence is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Windsor Woodmont Black Hawk Resort Corp., a
Colorado corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated: November 14, 2003      /s/ Jerry L. Dauderman
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              Jerry Dauderman
                              Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 14, 2003      /s/ Michael L. Armstrong
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              Michael L. Armstrong
                              Executive Vice President and
                              Chief Financial Officer
34091.

#### BARKER v. COOK.

Nichols, Chief Justice.

James Kirk Barker sought an order enjoining Rodney Cook from offering as a candidate for the office of governor. On July 24,1978, the trial court denied all relief sought. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on August 2, 1978. The primary which appellant sought to have appellee enjoined from entering was held on August 8, 1978. Appellee was nominated as candidate for governor by the Republican Party of Georgia but was unsuccessful in the general election. Since all issues raised by appellant relate to whether or not appellee was qualified *781to seek the office of governor, the appeal is moot.

Argued October 10, 1978

Decided January 4, 1979.

*Dupree & Staples, Hylton B. Dupree, Jr., Barry Staples,*for appellant.

*Alston, Miller & Gaines, Oscar N. Persons,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130783 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE JAMES RYAN MOLNAR and ELIZABETH RENEE MOLNAR, Minors.

________________ _______________ ___________

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 130783 COA: 267465 Oakland CC Family Division: 2003-685908-NA GERALD MOLNAR, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 15, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk
No. 45270.

#### Protests 496673-G, etc., of Banca Commerciale Italiana et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Bbown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar to that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
# C_2013026EN.01004902.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/49

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 November 2012 — Alstom v Commission

(Case T-164/12 R)

(Interim relief - Competition - Commission decision to transmit documents to a national court - Confidentiality - Right to effective judicial protection - Application for interim measures - Prima facie case - Urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2013/C 26/99

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alstom (Levallois-Perret, France) (represented by: J. Derenne, lawyer, N. Heaton, P. Chaplin and M. Farley, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Antoniadis, N. Khan and P. Van Nuffel, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: National Grid Electricity Transmission plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Magnus, C. Bryant and E. Coulson, Solicitors, J. Turner QC and D. Beard QC)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the Commission’s decision of 26 January 2012 contained in letters No D/2012/006840 and No D/2012/006863 from the Director General of the Commission’s Directorate-General for Competition, concerning the transmission of certain documents to the High Court of England and Wales for use in evidence in proceedings brought against the applicant, and an application for confidential treatment to be ordered in the present proceedings in respect of the professional secrets contained in the applicant’s reply of 30 June 2006 to the statement of objections in Case COMP/F/38.899 — Gas insulated switchgear.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Operation of the Commission’s decision of 26 January 2012 is suspended in so far as that decision concerns the transmission to the High Court of England and Wales of the confidential version of Alstom’s reply of 30 June 2006 to the statement of objections in Case COMP/F/38.899 — Gas insulated switchgear. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Operation of the Commission’s decision of 26 January 2012 is suspended in so far as that decision concerns the transmission to the High Court of England and Wales of the confidential version of Alstom’s reply of 30 June 2006 to the statement of objections in Case COMP/F/38.899 — Gas insulated switchgear.

| 2. | The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed as to the remainder.

| 3. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The costs are reserved.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Can’t fly without supply: materiel management circulates supplies

By Airman 1st Class Grace Nichols

                LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE, Ark.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Little Rock Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

materiel management flightLittle Rock Air Force Base19th Logistics Readiness SquadronsupplypartsstorageinventoryinspectionIndividual Protective Equipmentmateriel management
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 28, 2006, Cody Laboratories, Inc., 601 Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, Wyoming 82414, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule I and II: Drug
ScheduleDihydromorphine (9145)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IIAmobarbital (2125)
IIPentobarbital (2270)
IISecobarbital (2315)
IICocaine (9041)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIDiphenoxylate (9170)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IISufentanil (9740)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans on manufacturing the listed controlled substance in bulk for sale to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to bulk manufacture such a substance, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative(ODL), Washington, DC 20537, or any being sent via express mail should be sent to Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative(ODL), 2401 Jefferson Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be filed no later than July 17, 2007. Dated: May 10, 2007. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E7-9608 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P