alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-93229) and Form S-3 (File No.333-96901) of Datalink Corporation of our report dated February 13, 2001on our audit of the financial statements of Datalink Corporation for the yearended December 31, 2000 which report is included in this Form 10-K. Wealso consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-8 and Form S-3 of our report dated February 13, 2001 relating tothe financial statement schedule, which appears in the Annual Report onForm 10-K.

 

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota         |
| March 20, 2003                 |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Ho-Shang Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Ho-Shang Lee                     
|Ho-Shang Lee                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(chief executive officer)            
|                                     
|February 11, 2004                    

This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

- 28 -
# C_2012138EN.01003702.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/37

---

Action brought on 19th March 2012 — ZZ v FRA

(Case F-38/12)

(2012/C 138/88)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision not to renew the Appellant's contract and of the decision to transfer the Appellant to another department and the compensation of both moral and material prejudices.

Form of order sought

| — | The annulment of the decision not to renew the Applicant's contract; |
| --- | --- |

—

The annulment of the decision not to renew the Applicant's contract;

| — | the annulment of the decision to transfer the Applicant's to another department; |
| --- | --- |

—

the annulment of the decision to transfer the Applicant's to another department;

| — | the compensation of the Applicant's material prejudice estimated at 1 320 Euro par month from September 2012, to which be added late interest at the key rate of the European Central Bank plus two percentage points; |
| --- | --- |

—

the compensation of the Applicant's material prejudice estimated at 1 320 Euro par month from September 2012, to which be added late interest at the key rate of the European Central Bank plus two percentage points;

| — | the compensation of the Applicant's moral prejudice estimated at 50 000 Euros; |
| --- | --- |

—

the compensation of the Applicant's moral prejudice estimated at 50 000 Euros;

| — | the order for the Defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

the order for the Defendant to pay the costs.

---
No. 54354.

#### Chew Chong Tai & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 993716-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Kumquats similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342) were held dutiable at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 as oranges; (2) joss stick or joss light the same as the merchandise involved in Abstract 34216 was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1703; and (3) articles the same as those passed upon in *Rolls Razor, Inc.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 480) and Abstract 51306 were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as nonenumerated manufactured articles.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28472-28473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9662]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904; 
Binational Panel Reviews: Notice of Termination of Panel Review

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: On April 18, 2007, a Notice of Motion to Terminate the Panel 
Review of the Final Determination of the Antidumping Investigation on 
Imports of Fresh Apples, merchandise classified in tariff item 
08.08.10.01 from the United States of America, independent

[[Page 28473]]

of the country of origin was filed on behalf of Domex Marketing, Inc., 
L&M Companies Inc., Nuchief Sales, Inc., Oneonata Trading Corporation, 
PAC Marketing International, LLC., Rainier Fruit Company and Sage 
Marketing LLC., ``(las Reclamantes)''. Union Agricola Regional de 
Fruticultores del Estado de Chihuahua A.C., filed a notice of motion 
requesting termination in support of Domex and the others regarding 
Secretariat File No. MEX-USA-2003-1904-02.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Notice of Motion to Terminate the Panel Review 
and support of that motion, the panel review is terminated as of May 3, 
2007. A panel has not been appointed to this panel review. Pursuant to 
Rule 71(2) of the Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel 
Review, this panel review is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caratina L. Alston, United States 
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade 
Agreement (``Agreement'') establishes a mechanism to replace domestic 
judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and 
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with 
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel 
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national 
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine 
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of 
the country that made the determination.
    Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on 
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of 
Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were 
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). 
The panel review in this matter was requested and terminated pursuant 
to these Rules.

     Dated: May 15, 2007.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
 [FR Doc. E7-9662 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1341V

Filed: August 21, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

MAIA MERIN,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On August 31, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza vaccine received on October 20, 

2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office 

of Special Masters.

 

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 300aa (2012).
2

On August 21, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent agrees that petitioner suffered a Table SIRVA. Id. at 5. 

Respondent further agrees that the statutory six month sequela requirement has been 

satisfied. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
Before the First Division,

June 6, 1950

No. 54365.

#### Bankograph Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 113926-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of leather miniature boxing gloves and baseball gloves or other leather articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*(37 C. C. P. A. 32, C. A. D. 415), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001057114
<NAME> THE FINANCIAL GROUP CONNECTION, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,314
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,314)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,314)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (24,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (24,314)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 49465.

#### Protest 42933-K of Kraft Cheese Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese similar to that passed upon in Abstracts 36724 and 38185, an allowance was made for the weight of the paper or foil, or both, in which certain Danish Blue cheese was wrapped.
---




|**Consent of Independent Accountants**
|--------------------------------------
|                                      

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual
  Report on Form 40-F of Pacific Rim Mining Corp. of our report dated June 6,
  2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the
  Annual Report to Shareholders and to the Registration Statement on Form S-B
  (Sec No. 333.100832) initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  on October 28, 2002.

Staley, Okada & Partners

|Vancouver, BC | STALEY, OKADA & PARTNERS
|------------- | ------------------------
|July 27, 2007 | CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS   




---
(Reap. Dec. 8861)

#### Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 5068.

(Decided June 20, 1957)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel that the merchandise covered by the instant appeal for reappraisement consists of licorice tid bits exported from England.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation there was no foreign, export or United States value, as those terms are defined in Section 402 (c) (d) or (e) respectively of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for such or similar merchandise and that the cost of production as defined in subdivision (f) of said Section 402 was 102 shillings 6 pence per cwt.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was 102 shillings 6 pence per hundredweight. (English currency.)

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 65788.

#### Howard Berg et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/17705, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Class Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 5,550.

#### In re GOODWIN.

[3 N. B. R. 417 (Quarto, 106).] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Nov. 27, 1869.

Bankruptcy — Failure op Assignee to Comply with General Order No. 88.

Before the court can take action on the failure of an assignee in bankruptcy to comply with the requirements of general order No. 28, the same must be shown to it by at least prima facie evidence.

[In bankruptcy. In the matter of William P. Goodwin.]

By the Register:

I,Isaiah T. Williams, the registerof this •court in bankruptcy, to whom has been referred the above-entitled matter, do hereby •certify to this honorable court, that George V. House, of 683 Broadway, in the city of New York, was on the 9th day of July, A. D. 1869, duly elected assignee of the estate of the above-named bankrupt, and duly executed the bond required by the 13th section of the act, and received from me the assignment of the estate of the said bankrupt, on the 17th of August, 1869. And I do further certify that, in *pursuance*of the rule of this court in bankruptcy, adopted November 13th, 1869, I have called the attention of said assignee to the provisions of the general order No. 28, and I hereby bring the case to the notice of the court, although I have no means of knowing whether or not the said assignee has failed to make a report to the court of the funds received by him, as required by said general order.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

When an assignee fails to make a report to the court, of funds received by him, it-must be assumed that no funds have been received by him, and that no deposits have been made by him. In order to warrant proceedings against an assignee for not complying with general order No. 28, it must be shown at least by prima facie evidence that he nas received funds, or has made deposits in respect to which he ought to have made a report to the court under said general order. No such thing is shown in this case, and therefore there is nothing on which the court can base any action in the premises. The clerk will certify this decision to the register, Isaiah T. Williams, Esq.
P.O. Box 519 • Moore Haven, FL 33471 • 800 226
- 4024 • Fax 863 946
- 6262 • www.gladesec.com

Lake Placid 800 226
- 4025 • Fax 863 531
- 5012 Okeechobee 800 226
- 4023 • Fax 863 467
- 0855 November 9, 2010 The Honorable Lisa Jackson Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building (Mail Code 1101) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Re: Petition for Reconsideration of Portions of the Final Rule: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines Dear Administrator Jackson: I am writing in support of the National Rural Elect ric Cooperative Association’s (NRECA) October 19, 2020, Petition for Reconsideration of portions of the Final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines promulgated on August 20, 2010, ( 75 Fed. Re g. 51,570). Glades Electric Cooperative serves portions of four counties in Florida; Highlands, Okeechobee, Glades, and Hendry. Our service territory is predominantly rural and heavily reliant on agriculture. The recession has been extremely tough on our consumers and our counties have the highest unemployment figures in the state. In fact, our service territory has been designated as a Rural Area of Critical Economic Concern (RACEC). Additionally, the impending sale of U.S. Sugar Corporation to the State for Everglades ’ restoration has the potential to further devastate our area’s economy. The EPA does not need to be adding to the electricity bills of our members! NRECA’s petition addresses restrictions contained in the final rule that prohibit the use of small emergency generating units for p eak shaving programs and limits demand reduction service beginning in 2013 without the addition of expensive emission reduction technology on units larger than a specified size. Glades Electric supports NRECA’s recommendation of the removal of the restrictions on the use of these engines for peak shaving and demand reduction purposes within the 100 hours of non

- emergency operations already allowed under EPA rule

. We feel that, by not asking for additional hou rs beyond the 100 already provided within the rule , there would be no additional emissions and, therefore, no additional risk to health or environment, and would preserve a means of keeping energy affordable in rural areas. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have a ny questions or require additional information. Thank you for your consideration.
Paul McGehee Business Development Manager
cc: Robert Wayland Melanie King Kevin Bromberg, SBA
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Ho-Shang Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company. 
 
 /s/
Ho-Shang Lee
 Ho-Shang
Lee
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 (chief
executive officer)
 
 
 February
11, 2005
 
 This
certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.