alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Richard O. Hassan,  Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of Huile' Oil & Gas, Inc., a
Nevada   corporation  (the  "Company"),   hereby   certifies,   pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.ss.1350, that

     (1) the Company's Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
applicable; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: May 13, 2003                         /s/ RICHARD O. HASSAN, JR.
                                            __________________________
                                            Richard O. Hassan, Jr.
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            Huile' Oil & Gas, Inc.
CARSUNLIMITED.COM


EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of  Carsunlimited.com,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB of the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof,  I,  Daniel  Myers,
President,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
(1) the quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
quarterly  report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 22, 2005


                                        /s/ Daniel Myers
                                        ---------------------
                                        President, Chief
                                        Executive Officer, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and Director


A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                       20
(Reap. Dec. 9631)

#### Gustave Lap, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 58175.

(Decided March 11, 1960)

*Siegel, 'Mandell <£ Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been sub- . mitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or the price of the merchandise manufactured by Shuman & 'Schroeder covered by the invoice embraced in the above appeal to reappraisement at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less the amount added under duress.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> *609IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise manufactured by Schumann and Schreider1 covered by the invoice involved herein, and that such value is the appraised value, less the amount added under duress.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

1

 According to the papers on file, this is the correct name of the firm referred to in the Stipulation as Shuman and Schroeder.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 98-50454

Summary Calendar

_______________________

CHARLES DAVIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS AT HUGHES UNIT;

T. WORTHINGTON, Medical Doctor,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(W-96-CV-429)

_________________________________________________________________

August 4, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Davis complains of th e dismissal of his

complaint against a Hughes Unit prison doctor, T. Worthington, who

allegedly assaulted Davis while Davis was on crutches and used

excessive force against him. The district court, approving the

recommendation of a magistrate judge, dismissed the act ion for

failure to state a claim and as time-barred. Because we believe2

the limitations issue to be dispositive, we do not discuss whether

Davis stated a claim for constitutional injury.

Davis filed his c o mplaint in September 1993 against

pri son officials of the Wynne Unit of TDC. In November, 1993,

Davis alleged in an affidavit that the Hughes Unit prison doctor,

T. Worthington had used excessive force against him. Allegations

against Wynne Unit officials were disposed of by the district court

for the Ea stern District of Texas, while Davis’s claims against

Hughes Unit officials, such as Worthington, were transferred to the

Western District of Texas. In an amended complaint filed on

February 3, 1997, Davis finally n amed Worthington as a defendant

and alleged that Worthington assaulted him on July 27, 1993.

Because the statute of limitations for section 1 9 83

claims is two years, Davis’s complaint is time-barred unless, as he

contends, his amended complaint related back to the date of the

original complaint under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(c). Like the

district court, we find that the complaint did not relate back.

Davis’s first complaint neith er named Worthington as a defendant

nor set out any claims against him. Although Worthington was named

in an affidavit in a November 1993 pleading, this document, filed

solely at court, did not generate a summons against Worthington or

inform Worthington in any way that he had been made a party to the

lawsuit. Rule 15(c)(3) allows an amended pleading to relate back

when, inter alia

, the party brought in by the amendment received

notice of the institution of the action within a particular time,

and the party knew or should have known that, but for a mistake3

con cerning identity, the action would have been brought against

that party. As this test is not fulfilled, Davis’s amended

complaint could not relate back and cure the statute of limitations

problem concerning Dr. Worthington.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

.
PUBLIC LAW 115–214—JULY 24, 2018 132 STAT. 1543 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4646: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018): 

Mar. 5, considered and passed House. 

June 28, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 115–214 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1900 Corporate 

Drive in Birmingham, Alabama, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL THOMAS E. RIVERS, JR. POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1900 Corporate Drive in Birmingham, Alabama, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Thomas 

E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Thomas E. Rivers, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Approved July 24, 2018. 

July 24, 2018 

[H.R. 4646] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
# C_2012379EN.01003601.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/36

---

Action brought on 17 October 2012 — ZZ v Europol

(Case F-119/12)

2012/C 379/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Europol

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annul the decision of Europol not to renew the applicant’s contract for an unlimited duration and order Europol to pay the applicant the difference between the remuneration to which the applicant would have been entitled had she remained in her post at Europol and any other compensation actually received by her since 1 June 2012.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision taken by the defendant on 3 April 2012 by which it informed the applicant that her fixed-term contract expiring on 31 May 2012 would not be renewed; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision taken by the defendant on 3 April 2012 by which it informed the applicant that her fixed-term contract expiring on 31 May 2012 would not be renewed;

| — | order the defendant to pay the applicant the difference between (i) the remuneration to which she would have been entitled had she remained in her post at Europol and (ii) the amount of remuneration, fees, unemployment benefits and any other compensation actually received by her since 1 June 2012 by way of replacement for the remuneration she was receiving as a temporary agent; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the applicant the difference between (i) the remuneration to which she would have been entitled had she remained in her post at Europol and (ii) the amount of remuneration, fees, unemployment benefits and any other compensation actually received by her since 1 June 2012 by way of replacement for the remuneration she was receiving as a temporary agent;

| — | order Europol to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Europol to pay the costs.

---
# C_2013252EN.01005201.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/52

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single judge) of 25 June 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-115/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Action for damages - Availability of a parallel remedy - Manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 252/96

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the implied decision rejecting the claim for compensation for the harm purportedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the Commission’s sending a letter concerning the recovery of the sum of EUR 4 875 relating to the costs which the General Court ordered the applicant to pay in Case T-241/03.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013, p. 71.

1

---
34382.

#### DEAN v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Chief Justice.

Dean was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The state has filed an affidavit of his jailer establishing that he escaped from confinement in the Bibb County Jail four days before the filing of his notice of *809appeal and has not been recaptured. This information as to his status as a fugitive is uncontroverted. The state has moved to dismiss his appeal. The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. *Gravitt v. State,*221 Ga. 812 (147 SE2d 447) (1966); Binns *v. State,*229 Ga. 120 (189 SE2d 393) (1972); *Griffin v. State,*239 Ga. 795 (239 SE2d 16) (1977).

Decided January 4, 1979.

*Markwalter, Cook & Shaffer, C. R. Cook, R. R. Markwalter,*for appellant.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General,*W. *Davis Hewitt,*W. *Donald Thompson, District Attorney, Willis Sparks, III, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
No. 96-663.

#### Klehr et ux. *v.*A. O. Smith Corp. et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 519 U. S. 1073.] Motion of Plaintiffs Executive Committee MDL No. 1069 et al. for leave to file a brief as *amici curiae*granted.
# C_2015096EN.01001202.xml

| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2015 — Aer Lingus v Commission

(Case T-473/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Irish tax on air passengers - Lower rate for destinations no more than 300 km from Dublin - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Selective nature - Identification of the beneficiaries of the aid - Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Obligation to state reasons))

(2015/C 096/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aer Lingus Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: K. Bacon, D. Scannell, D. Bailey, Barristers, and A. Burnside, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Ireland (represented by: E. Creedon, A. Joyce and J. Quaney, acting as Agents, assisted by E. Regan SC, and B. Doherty, Barrister)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2013/199/EU of 25 July 2012 on State aid Case SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) — Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland (OJ 2013 L 119, p. 30).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 4 of Commission Decision 2013/199/EU of 25 July 2012 on State aid Case SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) — Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland, in so far as it orders the recovery of the aid from the beneficiaries for an amount which is set at EUR 8 per passenger in recital 70 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 4 of Commission Decision 2013/199/EU of 25 July 2012 on State aid Case SA.29064 (11/C, ex 11/NN) — Differentiated air travel tax rates implemented by Ireland, in so far as it orders the recovery of the aid from the beneficiaries for an amount which is set at EUR 8 per passenger in recital 70 of that decision;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs, as well as half of the costs incurred by Aer Lingus Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs, as well as half of the costs incurred by Aer Lingus Ltd;

| 4. | Orders Aer Lingus to pay half of its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Aer Lingus to pay half of its own costs;

| 5. | Orders Ireland to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Ireland to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
No. 96-5920.

#### Greenberg *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 24.1

Yorkshire Power Group Limited
Wetherby Road
Scarcroft
Leeds
LS14 3HS

									8
December 1999

Mr Armando A Pena
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus  Ohio 43215

Mr Richard C Kelly
1225 17th Street
Denver  Colorado 80502

Dear Sirs

Yorkshire Power Group Limited (the "Company") proposes to
file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended
31 December 1999, its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the
Quarters ended 31 March 2000, 30 June 2000 and  30 September
2000, and, if necessary, any Current Reports on Form 8-K
(collectively, the "Exchange Act Reports") with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The Company and the undersigned directors and officers of the
Company, individually as a director and/or as an officer of
the Company, hereby make, constitute and appoint each of you
our true and lawful attorney for each of us and in each of our
names, places and steads to sign and cause to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission the Exchange Act
Reports and any appropriate amendments thereto, to be
accompanied by any necessary exhibits.

The Company hereby authorises you or any one of you to execute
the Exchange Act Reports and amendments thereto on its behalf
as attorney-in-fact for it and its authorised officers, and to
file the same as aforesaid.

The undersigned directors and officers of the Company hereby
authorise you or any one of you to sign the Exchange Act
Reports on their behalf as attorney-in-fact and to amend, or
remedy any deficiencies with respect to, the Exchange Act
Reports by appropriate amendment or amendments and to file the
same as aforesaid.

Very truly yours.

YORKSHIRE POWER GROUP LIMITED



By  ...s/ Dr. E Linn Draper Jr.................

	Dr E Linn Draper Jr
	Chairman and Director




	...../s/ Wayne H Brunetti..................

	Wayne H Brunetti
	Director



	..../s/ Armando A Pena ...................

	Armando A Pena
	Director and Chief Financial Officer



	..../s/ Donald M Clements Jr..........

	Donald M Clements Jr
	Director



	..../s/ Richard C Kelly......................

	Richard C Kelly
	Director



	...../s/ Paul J Bonavia ....................

	Paul J Bonavia
	Director




** 	Complete only if the requested Interest Period is of an optional duration.
No. 45266.

#### Petition 6035-R of Pacific Trading Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

From the record it was .found that there was no intention to defraud the Government or to deceive the officials as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant License Renewal will hold a meeting on June 5, 2007, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows: 

*Tuesday, June 5, 2007—10:30 a.m. until 5 p.m.*

The Subcommittee will review the Vermont Yankee license renewal application and the associated Safety Evaluation Report (SER) prepared by the NRR staff. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., and other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Michael Junge (telephone 301/415-6855) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 6:45 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. 

Dated: May 8, 2007. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Branch Chief, ACRS.

[FR Doc. E7-9307 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 96-1051.

#### Illinois *v.*Nitz.

Sup. Ct. Ill. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Cer-tiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO
              18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350
              AS
      ADDED BY
              SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Peoples Financial Services
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard S. Lochen, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer/President, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  To
my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





By/s/
            Richard
      S. Lochen, Jr.
              Chief
      Executive Officer/President





Date:
March 16, 2009
Before the First Division,

October 16, 1942

No. 47642.

#### Protest 969037-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 44028 the jump sticks or trick paddles in question were held dutiable at *33%*percent under paragraph 412 as claimed.