alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ne= /n Situ Chemical Imaging of Plant Cell Walls

“9” National Renewable

Energy Laboratory Using CARS/SRS Microscopy ENERGY

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

Yining Zeng‘, Yu-San Liu’, Brian G. Saar?, X. Sunney Xie, Fang Chen’, Richard A. Dixon?, Mike E. Himmel! and Shi-You Ding**

‘National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO; “Harvard University, Cambridge, MA; *The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK; In collaboration with: David Johnson,
Qi Xu (NREL); Gary Holtom, Marcel Friedrich, (Harvard University); Arthur Ragauskas (Georgia Tech); Matthias Hess, Tao Zhang (JGI); Yunfeng Yang, Martin Keller (ORNL)

Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering (CARS ) Imaging of Lignin in Plant Cell Walls

Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS )

} °,
K Forward
e La etn
\
© eo <>
oa i
oe 1 >
‘Aromatic Ring Structures © vip =1600 cm | 50 um
in Lignin Sample —.
0 ——————
ZN Optical Frequency
Z ~ ~ )
|
. ot 5 ]

i) spy psp] fe

é
PU tay

Spontaneous Stimulated Coherent Ant-
Raman Raman Stokes Raman
‘on ‘cans) Epi- Detection

+ Hand-cut samples; sample treatment is not necessary “CARS intensity reveals lignin content across corn stover cell wall in the order: Epidermis1, sclerenchyma
+ Fast imaging rate fibers2 > Metaxylem3, Sclerenchymad, ProtoxylemS >Phloemé > Parenchyma7_

Simultaneous Chemical Imaging of Lignin and Cellulose During Acidic Pretreatment (Corn Stover )
t

t=0 Smin 6 min 7 min 8 min 10 min 15 min 20 min 25 min
*+ Selectively chemical bleaching of lignin, while cellulose is preserved during the process. CARS microscopy provides a powerful fool to monitor real-time and in situ chemical changes during biomass conversion.

XS), Offic e of This work is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Biomass Program to develop CARS microscopy and image corn

stover; the DOE Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research through the BioEnergy Science Center (BESC) to image transgenic alfalfa and poplar,
Science 24 ‘Stusy ofLignoceliulosic Material Degradation with CARS Microscopy’ (DE-FG02-07ERG64500) to develop new CARS method.

Presented atthe Bioenergy Sciences Center (BESC) Annual Retreat, 22-24 June 2009, Ashevile, North Carolina » NRELIPO-270-46340
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY INRELis a national laboratory ofthe U.S. Deparment of Energy, Offce of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Aliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

The BioE: nce Center (BESC) is aL nt of Energy 8 r u by th iological and Em tal Research
Attachment 2-Procedure for Generation of SN Curve from Laboratory Test Data 

The SN curve for the part is generated using a step procedure. In step 1, the mean and working 

endurance limits are computed from the test data. In step 2, the SN curve is generated from the 

equation: 

[1 ] endurance

s

f f

E Nγ

α

= +

For each failure point, a SN curve of the form 

-6

Characteristic Curve Endurance Limit

N=Number of Cycles to Failure x 10

=Material Constant

=Material Shape Parameter

S=Stress Amplitude

s

s

S E

N

where

E

γ

α

α

γ

= +

=

was passed through each test data point to compute the imputed endurance limit. The imputed 

endurance limit corresponding to the data point is determined from the relationship: 

1

test

endurance

s test

S

S

E Nγ

α

=

+

The SN curve parameters used for 4340 steel with chafing are: 

7.6

4

0.666

Es

α

γ

=

=

=

The SN curve parameters used for 4340 steel without chafing are: 

31

1

1

Es

α

γ

=

=

=

These are the values Sikorsky uses for steel. While the values are ostensibly proprietary to 

Sikorsky, they are well known in the helicopter industry as they have appeared in numerous 
papers presented at AHS meetings by Dave Adams, the then Chief of Mechanical Testing at 

Sikorsky. 

 

The mean endurance limit for the specimen is found from: 

1

1

n

endurance endurance

i

f f

n =

= ∑

The working endurance limit is: 

working endurance endurance f RF f = •

where RF is the reduction factor to account for specimen variability and is 0.7 for titanium and 

steel components which must have “three nines”(0.999) reliability.
# C_2013352EN.01002303.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/23

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 23 October 2013 — BQ v Court of Auditors

(Case F-39/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Official - Staff report - Psychological harassment - Damages - Admissibility - Time-limits)

2013/C 352/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BQ (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy, B. Schäfer and I. Ní Riagáin Düro, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the rejection by the European Court of Auditors of the applicant’s application seeking the recognition of unlawful conduct which allegedly caused him material and non-material harm

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Orders the Court of Auditors of the European Union to pay BQ EUR 2 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the Court of Auditors of the European Union to pay BQ EUR 2 000;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 12.05.2012, p. 38.

1

---
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v EDWARD W. JONES, Specialist Second Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

9 USCMA 709, 26 CMR 489

*710No. 11,370

Decided October 3, 1958

*Captain John F. Christensen*and *First Lieutenant Lawrence R. Fullem*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

Although the accused’s petition for grant of review roundly condemned paragraph *47d*of the Department of the Army Pamphlet No. 27-10, Military Justice Handbook: The Trial Counsel and The Defense Counsel, October 1954, of which we disapproved in United States v Darring, 9 USCMA 651, 26 CMR 431, the record does not disclose that the advice furnished the accused was predicated upon this policy in the present case. However, accused’s unchallenged affidavit indicates his decision *to forego*appellate representation was not freely and voluntarily made.

The decision of the board of review is set aside and the record of trial returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for a rehearing of the cause before another board of review, the accused at that time to be granted an election as to whether or not to be represented by appellate counsel.

Quinn, Chief Judge

(concurring):

It is alleged by the accused, and not disputed by the Government, that when he was informed of his right to appellate counsel before the board of review, not by his defense counsel as provided by paragraph *48j*(3) of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, but by the officer appointed to review his case, he was informed that “counsel was not ordinarilly [sic] requested because the case would be reviewed in Washington anyway and that a request for counsel would only delay matters.” Although it is alleged that the advice was provided in response to the Army policy to discourage requests for appellate representation by the accused who plead guilty, there is no actual showing that the policy prompted the advice. Nevertheless, the unchallenged statements by the accused indicate that his decision not to request appellate counsel was not freely and voluntarily made. I, therefore, join in setting aside the decision of the board of review and ordering a rehearing of the cause before another board of review.

Latimer, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

I agree with the majority that this is not a ease of the accused being advised to refuse appellate representation as a matter of Army policy. Compare United States v Darring, 9 USCMA 651, 26 CMR 431. However, the Uniform Code of Military Justice requires the accused to request appellate defense counsel and my reading of his affidavit leads me to conclude that he voluntarily waived his privilege for his own benefit after being informed that a board of review could reverse the conviction or reduce the sentence. I would therefore affirm the decision of the board of review.
Andrea Santilli Interactive Explorers, LLC. 218 166th St NE Bradenton, FL 34212 941-201-7727 santillia@interactiveexplorers.com www.interactiveexplorers.com September 15, 2015
To: FederalAviation Administration (FAA)

Pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Actof2012 and14 CFR Part 11, Anmea-SantHJ.i--weuld Uke--to--fe€JU9Stanexemption**to-~rate** her Phantom 3 Professional sUAS-

-------------------- FAA registration N592BQ for commercial purposes. She does not have a pilot's license but is a citizen ofthe United States, has a valid Florida Driver's license and will participate in any training and certification required bythe FAAto maintain her333 exemption.
As CEO of Interactive Explorers, LLC., she would like to use her skills in aerial photography and videographyto provide additional services to enhance interactive books and brochures for education and business. This would include aerial data capture for science and education, agricultural inspections, real estate, travel and tourism photography and videography. In addition, Interactive Explorers, LLC. could provide services thatwould assistwith search and rescue, infrastructure inspections and surveying needed to secure the safetyof people within the community.
Andrea Santilli seeks exemption based on the aircraft size, weight, and limited operating area. She respectfully requests thatthe FAAgrantthe following exemptions: 14 CFR § 21 , Subpart 

### H; 14 CFR§ 43.11; 14 CFR§ 91.103;14 CFR§ 91.105; 14CFR§ 91.109; 14 CFR.§ 91.119; 14 CFR§ 91.121; 14CFR§ 91.151 (a); 14CFR§ 91.215; 14CFR § 91.405(a) and (d); 14CFR § 91.407(a)(1};14 CFR § 91.409(a)(2); 14CFR § 417(a) and (b}.14 CFR 21, Subpart 

### H: Airworthiness Certificate.
Andrea Santilli will inspect her Phantom 3 Professional Drone before everyf!!ght and will ensure

--- ------ fuatshe-isirl-eompl[ance wfththe--operatmg documents (Monthly Maintenance Log, Flight Log& Flying Conditions, Instruction Manual). She will onlyfly her drone by utilizing a visual observer, will operate within a visual line of sight, and ensure her aircraft does not exceed an altitude of 400ft. She will not pilot her Phantom 3 Professional sUAS aircraft unless her pre-flight inspection indicates a safe operating condition and the external environments are safe for flight. Shewill staycurrent on the safety educational requirements and rules setforth bythe FAA, to ensure she is compliance with federal regulations ofsUAS for commercial purposes.

# ~~-'---- Andrea Santilli
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 27, 2009

d0120 

# Order

January 27, 2009

136519(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136519 COA: 283273 Oakland CC: 2002-182491-FC KENNETH MICHAEL SPARKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s October 27, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
No. 45265.

#### Petition 6052-R of Makagaki Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It appeared that prior to filing the entry additions were made in the invoice value of certain Japanese shoes and rubber boots to make market value and that there was an omission to add to the value of 26 pairs of boots. As it was evident that there was no intention to defraud the revenue the petition was granted.
No. 48186.

#### Protests 42199-K, etc., of Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

These cases are before the court on a motion by the Assistant Attorney General to dismiss, on the ground that they do not present a cause of action falling within the terms of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, which permits the filing of protests against decisions of the collector of customs and prescribes the conditions and limitations governing the filing of such protests. The declaration or complaint in both cases is substantially the same, except for entry number, name of vessel, etc., and is in the following language:

> We hereby protest against the liquidation of Entry #336934 and of demand made for the payment of duties in the amount of $596.82 covering an importation of antiques, etc., which arrived ex S/S “President Harding”, December 23, 1936 for the ultimate account of the owner, Mrs. Talbot Taylor, in care of the American Art Association, Anderson Galleries, 30 East ,57th Street, New York City.

> 

It is the opinion of the court that the motion should be granted but for reasons differing somewhat from those suggested by Government counsel. Inasmuch as the protests challenge a liquidation made by the collector it was found that they present a matter that is cognizable by this court, under said section 514, providing for “* * * decisions of the collector, including * * * his liquidation or reliquidation of any entry * * The court, therefore, could not base its judgment of dismissal on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. However, section 514 requires the importer to do something more than merely register his objection to the liquidation. It will be observed that the protests do not voice a single objection to any of the classifications, nor do they point to any provision of law that was violated in the liquidations complained of. Neither do they suggest in any way what the importer might deem the correct classification. It was therefore held that the protests failed utterly to comply with the requirements of the statute. The recital of the brokers who filed the protests respecting what took place at or about the time of entry, including the seizure and forfeiture of the goods because of the misrepresentations as to their character made by the said *435brokers, and who are the protestants herein, was found to have nothing to do with the liquidation; these alleged facts were held quite irrelevant and immaterial, so far as the liquidation is concerned. The motion to dismiss the protests was granted.
No. 45280.

#### Protests 772792-G, etc., of Saks & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 44140 the glass atomizers in question were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 218 (f) as claimed.
No. 49479.

#### Protests 23628-K, etc., of Aoki Taiseido Book Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the books in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Aoki Taiseido*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 217, C. D. 757). The protests were therefore sustained to this extent.
# C_2012273EN.01002305.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/23

---

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Gas v OHIM — Grotto (GAS)

(Case T-92/12) (1)

1

2012/C 273/43

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, David W.Whitwell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IWT TesoroCorporation, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this reporton Form 10-Q of IWT Tesoro Corporation for the quarter ended March 31,2007;

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this  report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this  report;

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and we have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this  reportis being prepared;

b) Paragraph omittedpursuant to SEC Release Nos.  33-8238 and34-47986;

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a) All significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
| Date: May 14, 2007 | By:                     | /s/ David  W. Whitwell. |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|               | David W. Whitwell,      |
|               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Digest of One-Hundred Selected Health and Insurance Plans Under Collective Bargaining, 1954

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Digest of One-Hundred Selected Health and Insurance Plans Under Collective Bargaining, 1954 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1180*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										June 1955,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4480,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32.1   WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada (the “Company”) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (a) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: May 9, 2007 /s/ Donald R. Mayer Donald R. Mayer Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer