alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1  (00161105.DOC;1)


Exhibit 10.1




Wausau Paper Corp.

2008 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan







An individual officer’s grant at each tier will vest upon the Company’s achievement of Targeted Levels of Return on Capital Employed for such tier and, with respect to the restricted stock units, the satisfaction of minimum service criteria.  The maximum potential award for the CEO, CFO, and each of the named executive officers is the cumulative award payable under each of Tiers I, II, and III.




				
	 	Tier I (3%*)

	Tier II (8%*)

	Tier III (13%*)


	CEO

	Restricted stock units equal

	Options (100 shares 

	Restricted stock units equal


	 	to 35% of base salary(1)

	per $1,000 base salary)(2)

	to 30% of base salary(1)


	 	 	 	 
	CFO

	Restricted stock units equal

	Options (100 shares 

	Restricted stock units equal


	 	to 30% of base salary(1)

	per $1,250 base salary)(2)

	to 25% of base salary(1)


	 	 	 	 
	Executive Vice President,

	Restricted stock units equal

	Options (100 shares 

	Restricted stock units equal


	Administration

	to 30% of base salary(1)

	per $1,250 base salary)(2)

	to 25% of base salary(1)


	 	 	 	 
	Executive Vice President,

	Restricted stock units equal

	Options (100 shares 

	Restricted stock units equal


	Specialty Products

	to 30% of base salary(1)

	per $1,250 base salary)(2)

	to 25% of base salary(1)


	 	 	 	 
	Senior Vice President,

	Restricted stock units equal

	Options (100 shares 

	Restricted stock units equal


	Towel & Tissue

	to 30% of base salary(1)

	per $1,250 base salary)(2)

	to 25% of base salary(1)







 * Targeted Levels of Return on Capital Employed.  For purposes of this plan, Targeted Levels of Return on Capital Employed is determined by excluding base gains from timberland sales and adjusting for other extraordinary items (which may include, for example, facility closure charges or other similar items).

(1) Number of shares determined by closing price of Company stock on last business day preceding date of grant.

(2) Exercise price equal to closing price of Company stock on date of grant.
No. 40476.

#### Protests 757858-G, etc., of Jordan Marsh Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.39


                     AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") is made
and entered into as of January 1, 1999, by and between Werner Co., a
Pennsylvania corporation (the "Company"), successor by merger to Werner
Management Co. ("WMC") and ______________________ ("Executive").

         WHEREAS, WMC and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement as of
November 24, 1997 (the "Agreement") which govern the terms and conditions of
Executive's employment with the Company; and

         WHEREAS, on June 30, 1998, WMC was merged with and into the Company
with the Company being the surviving corporation; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to enter into this Amendment
to amend certain terms of the Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, the Company and Executive agree as follows:


         1.       AMENDMENT TO PERFORMANCE BASED COMPENSATION.
         Section 3.2 of the Agreement shall be amended by deleting the second
sentence following the chart contained in Section 3.2, which sentence reads as
follows: "The EBITDA targets for the 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 fiscal years are
set out in Exhibit 2, attached." In addition, Exhibit 2 of the Agreement is
hereby deleted in its entirety.

         2.       REMAINING PROVISIONS.
         All provisions of the Agreement not otherwise amended by this Amendment
shall remain in full force and effect.

                                       1
<PAGE>   2



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed as of the day
and year first above written.


                                         WERNER CO., a Pennsylvania
                                         Corporation



                                         By:      ________________________
                                         Title:   ________________________



                                         EXECUTIVE


                                         _________________________________
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK J. KELLY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 408 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Unpublished 

Memorandum and Order of the 

Superior Court at No. 2162 EDA 

2019 entered on June 29, 2020, 

affirming the Order of the Carbon 

County Court of Common Pleas at 

No. CP-13-CR-0000551-2013 

entered on June 27, 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. We VACATE the decision of the Superior Court and REMAND for the 

Superior Court to apply Commonwealth v. Lacombe, 234 A.3d 602 (Pa. 2020). 

DECIDED: January 22, 2021
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Children learn about the agency and ways to make themselves safer

By Tim Hoyle  DLA Disposition Services

                Battle Creek, Michigan  –              Cyber Safety Initiative

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1376 

To conform income calculations for purposes of eligibility for the refundable 

credit for coverage under a qualified health plan and for Medicaid to 

existing Federal low-income assistance programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2011 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To conform income calculations for purposes of eligibility 

for the refundable credit for coverage under a qualified 

health plan and for Medicaid to existing Federal lowincome assistance programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1376 IS

1 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF 100 PERCENT OF SOCIAL SECU2 RITY AND TIER I RAILROAD RETIREMENT 

3 BENEFITS IN INCOME FOR PURPOSES OF ELI4 GIBILITY FOR THE REFUNDABLE CREDIT 

5 FOR COVERAGE UNDER A QUALIFIED 

6 HEALTH PLAN AND FOR MEDICAID. 

7 (a) DEFINITION OF MODIFIED ADJUSTED GROSS IN8 COME.—Subparagraph (B) of section 36B(d)(2) of the In9 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

10 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and’’ after the 

11 comma; 

12 (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the 

13 end and inserting ‘‘, and’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(iii) an amount equal to the portion 

16 of the taxpayer’s social security benefits 

17 (as defined in section 86(d)) which is not 

18 included in gross income under section 86 

19 for the taxable year.’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after De22 cember 31, 2013. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.4



                   WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN AND PRESIDENT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the annual report of NB Finance,  Ltd. (the  "Company"),  for
the period  ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on Form 20-F on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Martin  Ouellet,
President of the Company, certify that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Martin Ouellet
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Martin Ouellet
                                        President



Dated: June 29, 2004








A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to NB Finance,  Ltd.,  and will be  retained  by NB Finance  Ltd.  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131675 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

WALLACE CARROLL JUSTICE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131675 

 COA: 266924 

Ct of Claims: 05-000117-MZ 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Paul
Engle, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Avanex Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Avanex
Corporation.





By:

/s/    Paul EngleName:

Paul EngleTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer





I, Jessy Chao, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Avanex Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Avanex Corporation.





By:

/s/    Jessy ChaoName:

Jessy ChaoTitle:

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>






                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Infinity  Capital Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Gregory
H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 15, 2005

/s/Gregory H. Laborde
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer and President


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 40455.

#### Protests 968558-G, etc., of Testing Machines, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of automatic testing machines, paper scales, micrometers, and parts of micrometers similar to that passed upon in *Testing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(T. D. 49608). The claim at 27)4 percent under paragraph 372 was therefore sustained.
#### Alan E. WALKER and Kathleen Walker, Appellants, v. Robert W. BOYCE, Appellee.

No. 98-2981.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 16, 1999.

Atkinson, Diner, Stone, Mankuta *&*Ploucha, P.A. and Kimberly Hall Doyle, Hollywood, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a default final judgment and an order denying the appellants’ motion to vacate default and motion for rehearing. Given the record evidence that the appellants established excusable neglect, due diligence upon discovery of *579the default and a meritorious defense to this suit, we conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to set aside the default final judgment. *See Andrade v. Andrade,*720 So.2d 551, 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); *Shaker Lakes Apts. Co. v. Dolinger,*714 So.2d 1040, 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); *Atlantic Asphalt & Equip. Co., Inc. v. Mairena,*578 So.2d 292, 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); *Ponderosa, Inc. v. Stephens,*539 So.2d 1162, 1163 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); *B.C. Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado,*405 So.2d 1345, 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings on the merits.

Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                      <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998              DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         20,740                       11
<SECURITIES>                                    8,092                    2,685
<RECEIVABLES>                                 113,249                  121,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                    5,870                    4,721
<INVENTORY>                                         0                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              142,594                  122,012
<PP&E>                                         59,495                   55,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                 33,028                   35,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                257,653                  166,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         113,343                   69,054
<BONDS>                                        55,130                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                        0
<COMMON>                                          363                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                     88,817                   88,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  257,653                  166,790
<SALES>                                       216,451                  176,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              403,571                  314,593
<CGS>                                          90,026                   72,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 163,925                  129,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              242,191                  150,738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                2,384                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,482                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 7,491                   39,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,253                   14,810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             6,238                   25,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                        0
<CHANGES>                                           0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    6,238                   25,013
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.18                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.18                     0.80
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: September 24, 2004                   By: /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Alex Stelmak
                                              Chief Financial Officer


Date: September 24, 2004                   By: /s/ Abel Raskas
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Abel Raskas
                                              President
### NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 166

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE

OF CHRIS HOLT AND MICHELLE HOLT

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 105 th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant attempted to perfect an appeal from a ruling on Special Exceptions and

Motion to Strike entered by the 105 th District Court of Nueces , County, Texas, in cause

nu mber 09

- 1754

- D

. T he ruling does not appear to be a final appealable order. On March

26, 2020, t he c lerk of th e c ourt notified appellant of this defect so steps could be taken to

correct the defect, if it could be done. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3. The notice advised

appellant that if the defect was not corrected within thirty days, the appeal would be

dismissed. Appell ant failed to respond to the Court ’ s notice.2 The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to

correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion the appeal should be dismissed

.

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED fo r want of prosecution

. See id. 42.3( a ),(c).

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

D elivered and filed the 17th

day of September , 2020

.
No. 54355.

#### Chong Sing & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 677588-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that a portion of the milled rice, namely, 2%o percent of the weight, consists of broken rice of the same character and description as that involved in Abstract 48704, the claim at five-eighths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 727 was sustained. Merchandise stipulated to be similar in all material respects to the medlars the subject of *Walter T. Ueland*v. *United States*(65 Treas Dec. 344, T. D. 46923) was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2029

Lower Tribunal No. CF22-001337-XX

_____________________________

RICHARD ALLEN SATTERFIELD,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Lori A. Winstead, Judge.

December 12, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and NARDELLA and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED