alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>






                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended  Quarterly Report of Infinity Capital Group, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Gregory H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 USC section  1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: September 20, 2006


/s/Gregory H. Laborde
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer and President


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO
              18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350
              AS
      ADDED BY
              SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Peoples Financial Services
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard S. Lochen, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer/President, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  To
my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





By/s/
            Richard
      S. Lochen, Jr.
              Chief
      Executive Officer/President





Date:
March 17, 2008
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hoyt Albert GAULTNEY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Keith STEAGALD, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 78-5329, 78-5416.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.*

Dec. 15, 1981.

J. Richard Young, Atlanta, Ga., for Hoyt Albert Gaultney.

Albert M. Horn, Atlanta, Ga., for Gary Keith Steagald.

Robert Boas, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

*

 Former Fifth Circuit case, Section 9(3) of Public Law 96^152 — October 14, 1980.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before CHARLES CLARK, THORN-BERRY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing, 656 F.2d 109 (5th Cir.), filed in the above entitled and numbered cause by the United States of America be and the same is hereby granted. Since this action does not affect the only appellant properly before us, no response is required. The mandate which issued in these consolidated causes on the 1st day of September, 1981, was recalled on the 26th day of October, 1981, to prevent injustice. *See*Fifth Circuit Local Rule 17.

Hoyt Albert Gaultney did not appeal this court’s decision in Cause 78-5329. Our mandate in Gaultney’s appeal issued previously and has been executed. The inclusion of the cause styled *United States of America v. Hoyt Albert Gaultney,*No. 78-5329, in the style of our prior mandate was in error. So were the statements contained in the mandate to the effect that the Supreme Court reversed this court’s affirmance of the judgment of conviction of Hoyt A. Gaultney for possessing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and unlawfully importing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a). The errors in style and in the mandate as set out above are deleted. All references to the reversal of the affirmance by this court of the conviction of Gary K. Steagald in this mandate are correct and shall not be affected by this deletion. A mandate modified as directed herein is attached. This mandate as modified on petition for rehearing shall issue immediately in *United States v. Gary Keith Steagald,*No. 78-5416.
# C_2014142EN.01003402.xml

| 12.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/34

---

Order of the General Court of 5 March 2013 — Chrysamed Vertrieb v OHIM — Chrysal International (Chrysamed)

(Case T-46/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 142/44

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH (Salzburg, Austria) (represented by: initially T. Schneider, subsequently M. Koch and finally I. Rungg, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Chrysal International BV (Naarden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Killan, M. Marell and M. Senftleben, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 November 2011 (Case R 64/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Chrysal International BV and Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Dr.  Oliver  Wiedow, certify, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual
report  of  Proteo,  Inc.  And  Subsidiaries  on  form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly  presents  in all material respects the
financial  condition and results of operations of Proteo, Inc. And Subsidiaries.



Date:  April  14,  2004                            By:  /s/  Oliver  Wiedow
                                                    -----------------------
                                                Professor  Dr.  Oliver  Wiedow
                                                Principal  Executive  Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  typed  from  within  the  electronic  version of this written statement
required  by Section 906, has been provided to Proteo, Inc. And Subsidiaries and
will  be  retained  by  Proteo,  Inc.  And  Subsidiaries  and  furnished  to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
No. 47033.

#### Protest 46593-K of R. F. Revson Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The merchandise consists of quince seed. The collector required that the containers be marked with the word “Persia” before-they were released. The owner of the importing company testified that the quince-seed was packed in corrugated paper cartons and that two smaller cartons, which contained the seed, were enclosed in one larger outside carton, but that the inner cartons were marked with the words “Persian seed” in English, and that those words do not refer to any particular kind of seed. As the record established that-the immediate containers of the quince seed were marked with the words “Persian seed” in typewriting on a label which was pasted thereon, and since this-shipment was entered after the Customs Regulations of 1937 became effective, the court held that the marking was a proper compliance with article 528 of said' regulations. The protest was therefore sustained following Abstracts 36609, 36077, 40549, 41128, and 42581, and *Asiam, Inc.*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 68, T. D. *49065), American Hatters & Furriers*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 111, C. D. 31), and *Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(22 C. C. P. A. 111, T. D. 47103).
No. 92-1517.

#### W. M. Schlosser Co., Inc. *v.*School Board of Fairfax County, Virginia.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
S10-l(K)9()l-07 

cr? 

• c ^ 

— 1 

> 

-.9 

— 

• , ^ 

- ' -, i, „.' 

CO 

SOWOMA 

C O U M T Y 

AMtftiCA*! PftEMiia WINf, MW 

AM> COASTAL OtlTiNAtlON 

August 23, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington DC 

Subyect: Docket OST-2010-0124 

Dear Secretary LaHood; 

I strongly support the Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport application for a grant under the Small 

Community Air Service Development Program. This grant along with local funds will provide for 

marketing and advertising to attract int)Ound passengers to Sonoma County on Horizon Air. 

Horizon Air has been an excellent partner for Sonoma County in providing nonstop air service to Los 

Angeles, Las Vegas, Portland, and Seattle. Traffic response from the local Sonoma County market has 

been excellent. Unfortunately, the Inbound passenger numbers have not been as large as expected. 

Sonoma County is well known as the Wine Country and local businesses in our area depend heavily on 

tourism spending to support our economy. The Sonoma County Airport and its marketing partners have 

developed a program to attract inbound visitors to Sonoma County and increase the revenue for 

Horizon Air. 

The cost of marketing and advertising in Los Angeles, Portland, and Seattle is too high for the Sonoma 

County Airport and its marketing partners to do it by themselves. The award of the requested grant will 

give the Airport and its partners the funding that it needs to do an effective job of promoting Sonoma 

County and increase the numt)er of ^itor s to our area. It is estimated that the additional passengers 

am'ving from this program will generate over $11 million in visitor spending in the local community. 

We also know that higher load factors for Horizon Air can mean more flights to existing markets and to 

new markets. This program, with the support of funding from the Small Community Program, will 

definitely be a win-win situation for toca\ business, the tourism community, the airline, the airport, 

various vendors, and the traveling public. Your support of our request is most appreciated. 

Sincerely (jJ^l ^ 

Mark J. Crabb, Director of Sales 

Sonoma County Tourism Bureau
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>I
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
audited financial statements of Toups Technology  Licensing,  Incorporated dated
December  31,  1998  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                         1
<CURRENCY>                  US Dollars
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 12/31
<PERIOD-START>                 01-01-98
<PERIOD-END>                  12-31-98
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                          772,080
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,848,236
<ALLOWANCES>                   (79,237)
<INVENTORY>                     542,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              3,175,510
<PP&E>                        2,170,072
<DEPRECIATION>                  152,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                5,312,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         1,629,930
<BONDS>                         322,112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                         22,217
<OTHER-SE>                    3,338,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  5,312,840
<SALES>                       3,132,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              3,132,001
<CGS>                         1,984,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 3,276,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               14,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>             (2,144,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                     43,760
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         (2,187,994)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                (2,187,994)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (.18)
        


</TABLE>
##### 



CIBC World Markets
    
    CIBC WORLD MARKETS PLC
Cottons Centre
Cottons Lane
London, England SE1 2QL
Tel:   44 (0)20 7234 4127
Fax:   44 (0)20 7407 4127
 The Parent, Borrowers, and the Charging and Guaranteeing Companies
FAO: Mike Bissell
Financial Director
Trench Electric B.V.
Southfield (2nd Floor)
York Place
Station Parade
Harrogate HG1 1HL 7 March 2002 Re: Consent letter with respect to (i) Proceeds for Sale of Technology; (ii)
Shanghai Capital Expenditures; and (iii) Other Amendments With reference to the Facilities Agreement in relation to US$25,000,000 Term
Facility and a US$35,000,000 Revolving Credit Facility Amended and Restated as
at 20th June 2000 and Amended as at 29th November 2000, 12th January 2001 and
12th July 2001 by way of side letters. With respect to CIBCs letter to the Banks dated 14th November 2001, outlining
certain amendment proposals from the Company with regard to the proceeds from
the sale of technology; Shanghai Capital Expenditures; and any other amendments
so far as they relate to affecting these consents we are very pleased to
announce that Majority Bank consent was achieved, as per the e-mail notice to
that effect of 21st November 2001. Please countersign and fax back a copy of the letter as formal acknowledgement.
Additionally, two original copies of the letter will be forwarded to you. I
would be grateful if you would execute the letters by signing each letter and
return one original to my attention and retaining the other for your records. Neither this letter nor our entry into discussions with the Company regarding
these matters is not and shall not be deemed to be a waiver in any respect of
the Banks rights and/or remedies. This letter is governed by and constructed in accordance with English law. Yours sincerely Signed: /s/ Richard Vaughan
Richard Vaughan
Director, Leveraged Finance
For and on behalf of CIBC World Markets plc
In its capacity as Agent




---



##### 



We agree to the above: Signed for itself an on behalf of the Parent, Borrowers, and the Charging and
Guaranteeing Companies the Borrowers by: Signed:
    /s/ Michael John BissellName:
    Michael John BissellPosition:
    Group Finance DirectorDate:
    22nd March, 2002
EX-10.12.5.2



 





Exhibit 10.12.5.2











			
	Cascal BV	 	 
	Atrium 7th floor	 	 
	Strawinskylaan 3105	 	 
	1077 ZX Amsterdam
	 	13 December, 2006
	Amsterdam	 	 
	The Netherlands	 	 






Dear Sirs,



We, the Borrower under the terms of the Inter-company Loan Agreement dated 28 June 2006 for a
sterling facility of £3,500,000, request that the Parties extend the term of this facility from 31
October 2006 until 31 January 2007, or such later date as we might both subsequently agree in
writing. The Maturity Date will therefore become 31 January 2007.



We would also wish to take this opportunity to confirm that we repaid US $1,610,000 (US Dollars one
million six hundred & ten thousand dollars) on the 9th November 2006 which at the spot exchange
rate on that day of 1.9065 means that we duly repaid £844,479 (UK pounds eight hundred & forty-four
thousand four hundred & seventy nine) of this facility on that date.



Please acknowledge your agreement to the contents of this letter by counter-signing the duplicate
copy and returning it to the undersigned.



Yours faithfully,





	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ DL Magor	 	 
	DL Magor	 	 
	Finance Director	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Stephane Marcel Jean Richer	 	 
	For and on behalf of Cascal BV
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:
	 	13-12-2006 	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 	 






www.biwater.com




Biwater Plc

Biwater House, Station Approach, Dorking, Surrey RH4 1TZ England

Tel +44 (0) 1306 740740 fax +44 (0) 1306 885233




Registered in England No. 929686 Registered Office Biwater House, Station Approach, Dorking, Surrey
89–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–368 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE BILL (H.R. 3288) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2010, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

DECEMBER 9, 2009.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 961] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 961, by a record vote of 8 to 4, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of the Conference Report to accompany H.R. 3288, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 

2010. The resolution waives all points of order against the conference report and against its consideration. The resolution provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. Finally, the resolution provides that the previous question shall be 

considered as ordered without intervention of any motion except 

one hour of debate and one motion to recommit. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against the conference report 

and against its consideration includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule 

XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports and the 

accompanying joint explanatory statement); a waiver of clause 9 of 

rule XXII (precluding conferees from including matter outside the 

scope of conference); and a waiver of section 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act (regarding consideration of legislation providing 

new budget authority in excess of a subcommittee’s 302(b) allocation of such authority). 

The conference report does not violate clauses 9 or 10 of rule 

XXI. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS
2 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 287 

Date: December 9, 2009. 

Measure: Conference Report to accompany H.R. 3288. 

Motion by: Mr. Dreier. 

Summary of motion: To prohibit the bill from being called up any 

earlier than 11:23 p.m. on Friday, December 11, 2009 to allow all 

Members and the public an opportunity to review this 2,500 page, 

$1⁄2 trillion bill. 

Results: Defeated 4–8. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Hastings (FL)—Nay; Matsui—Nay; Cardoza—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; Pingree—Nay; Polis—Nay; 

Dreier—Yea; Diaz-Balart, L.—Yea; Sessions—Yea; Foxx—Yea; 

Slaughter—Nay. 

Rules Committee record vote No. 288 

Date: December 9, 2009. 

Measure: Conference Report to accompany H.R. 3288. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 8–4. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; Matsui—Yea; Cardoza—Yea; Arcuri—Yea; Pingree—Yea; Polis—Yea; 

Dreier—Nay; Diaz-Balart, L.—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Foxx—Nay; 

Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

IN RE: THE NAME CHANGE OF A.C.S.

, Appellant,

No. 4D 17

- 962

[ July 12, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Karen M. Miller , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- DR

- 011634

.

Erica N. Tschiggfrie, Jupiter, pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

M AY

, C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motio n for rehearing.