alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


             Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, John W. Peters, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of Skinovation
Pharmaceutical Incorporated certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..     the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date:   May 10, 2004
                                   /s/ John W. Peters
                                   _________________________________________
                                   John W. Peters
                                   Principal Executive and Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated January 16, 2007, and published in the Federal 
Register on January 23, 2007, (72 FR 2907), Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, 
Inc., 870 Badger Circle, Grafton, Wisconsin 53024, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed in schedule I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Dihydromorphine (9145).....................  I
Dihydrocodeine (9120)......................  II
Oxycodone (9143)...........................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Sufentanil (9740)..........................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
Remifentanil (9739)........................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class 
of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to ensure 
that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. 
The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-9642 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# C_2013063EN.01000603.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany), lodged on 13 November 2012 — Aslihan Nazli Ayalti v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-513/12)

2013/C 63/10

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Aslihan Nazli Ayalti

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Do Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol of 23 November 1970 to the Agreement of 12 September 1963 establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey for the transitional stage of the Association (AP) and/or Article 13 of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC-Turkey Association Council of 19 September 1980 (Decision No 1/80) preclude a provision of national law which was introduced for the first time after the abovementioned provisions had come into force and which makes the first entry of a member of the family of a Turkish national who enjoys the legal status under Article 6 of Decision No 1/80 conditional on the requirement that, prior to entry, the family member can demonstrate the ability to make himself or herself understood, in a basic way, in the German language? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol of 23 November 1970 to the Agreement of 12 September 1963 establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey for the transitional stage of the Association (AP) and/or Article 13 of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC-Turkey Association Council of 19 September 1980 (Decision No 1/80) preclude a provision of national law which was introduced for the first time after the abovementioned provisions had come into force and which makes the first entry of a member of the family of a Turkish national who enjoys the legal status under Article 6 of Decision No 1/80 conditional on the requirement that, prior to entry, the family member can demonstrate the ability to make himself or herself understood, in a basic way, in the German language?

| 2. | If the first question is to be answered in the negative: does the first subparagraph of Article 7(2) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (1) preclude the provision of national law mentioned in Question 1? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is to be answered in the negative: does the first subparagraph of Article 7(2) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (1) preclude the provision of national law mentioned in Question 1?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of

Chief Executive Officer

of Mannatech, Incorporated

This certification is
provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Mannatech, Incorporated (the
Issuer).

I, Samuel L. Caster, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 16, 2006



/s/ Samuel L. CasterSamuel L. CasterChief Executive Officer


Subscribed and sworn to before me

This 16thday of March, 2006



|                     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Christina Dutton
|Name:                |  | Christina Dutton             
|Title:               |  | Notary Public, State of Texas

My commission expires: March 19, 2010

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mannatech, Incorporated

and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)



1
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 25, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-00441-CV FELTON LOVE AND PHILLIP MITCHELL, Appellants V. TANYA WATKINS, Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18233 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Jus tice Molberg, and Justice Nowell Opinion by Chief Justice Burns The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated April 17, 2019, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned ap pellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated Apri l 17, 2019, we informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned app ellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismiss al of this appeal without further notice. By letter dated May 15, 2019, we informed appellant th e clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We dire cted appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten days. We–2– cautioned appellant that failure t o do so would result in the d ismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provid ed the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regar ding the status of t his appeal. Accordingly, we dism iss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

190441F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

FELTON LOVE AND PHILLIP MITCHELL, Appellants
No. 05-19-00441-CV V. TANYA WATKINS, Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-18233. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Now ell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this app eal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee TANYA WATKINS recover her costs of this appeal f rom appellants FELTON LOVE AND PHILLIP MITCHELL.
Judgment entered June 25, 2019
Exhibit 32.1   Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated (the “Company”) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  • the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  • the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: May 9, 2007 /s/ John W. Peters John W. Peters Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
# C_2013026EN.01007201.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/72

---

Action brought on 22 October 2012 — ZZ v Council

(Case F-122/12)

2013/C 26/147

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Lecuyer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Council dismissing the applicant and compensation for the material and non-material damage suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision taken by the Council dismissing the applicant and, so far as necessary, annul the rejection of his complaint against that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision taken by the Council dismissing the applicant and, so far as necessary, annul the rejection of his complaint against that decision;

| — | order the Council to pay the applicant a sum of EUR 160 181,85 provisionally as compensation for the material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the applicant a sum of EUR 160 181,85 provisionally as compensation for the material damage suffered;

| — | order the Council to pay the applicant a sum of EUR 25 000 provisionally as compensation for the non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the applicant a sum of EUR 25 000 provisionally as compensation for the non-material damage suffered;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

---
No. 46407.

#### Protests 868365-G, etc., of American Dyewood Co. et al. (New York).

*283Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-914]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of International Regimes and Agreements


Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Subsequent Arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of Section 131 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The 
Department is providing notice of a proposed ``subsequent arrangement'' 
under the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear 
Energy between the United States and the European Atomic Energy 
Community (EURATOM).
    This subsequent arrangement concerns a request for a one-year 
extension (April 2007 to April 2008) of the current one-year 
programmatic approval for retransfer of U.S.-obligated irradiated fuel 
rods between Studsvik Nuclear AB, Sweden and the Institutt for 
Energiteknikk, Norway. The rods are being transferred for irradiation 
service, tests and examination, and returned to Sweden for further 
tests and disposal. The amounts are the same as under the current 
approval--a maximum of 30,000 grams uranium, 400 grams U-235 and 400 
grams plutonium in all shipments combined, with a maximum of 100 grams 
of plutonium per shipment. The original programmatic consent, published 
in the Federal Register June 13, 2006, is set to expire in March 2007. 
Additional transactions are scheduled to occur between April 2007 and 
April 2008 and will be subject to U.S.-Euratom Agreement for 
Cooperation on Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.
    In accordance with Section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, we have determined that this subsequent arrangement will not 
be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than 15 days 
after the date of publication of this notice.

    Dated: January 12, 2007.
    For the Department of Energy.
Richard Goorevich,
Director, Office of International Regimes and Agreements.
 [FR Doc. E7-914 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 74-5964.

#### Olenz *v.*Cleary et al.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Industrial Hardware contracting officer earns DLA Troop Support Employee of the Month

By DLA Troop Support Public Affairs

A contracting officer who works on two highly visible programs in the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support’s Industrial Hardware supply chain was named the Employee of the Month for December.

Thomas Smith manages the Acquisition Advice Code J program for non-stocked material, which has generated more than 1,270 delivery orders over two years.

He also serves as a contracting officer for a support program that maintains approximately 8,000 bench stock items at 20,000 bin locations at the Corpus Christi Army Depot. 

According to his award citation, Smith is an invaluable member of his team, selflessly offers assistance when needed and approaches each new hurdle with a smile.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Troop SupportIndustrial HardwareWarfighter FirstCorpus Christi Army Depot
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1501

SANJEEV MALHOTRA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WATERGATE AT LANDMARK (WAL) CONDOMINIUM

ASSOCIATION, WAL Board of Directors and/or its

assignees,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:05-cv-00076-LMB)

Submitted: October 12, 2007 Decided: October 23, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sanjeev Malhotra, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Curtis Gartner,

WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sanjeev Malhotra appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motions to reopen and for sanctions. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Malhotra v.

Watergate at Landmark Condo. Assoc., No. 1:05-cv-00076-LMB (E.D.

Va. Apr. 4 & 6, 2007). We deny Appellee’s motion for sanctions.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Learn more about Succession Management by accessing the available via LMS.... 

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Martime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The Succession Management Awareness course is available for viewing in LMS. 

Until the course is added as a featured course, it can be accessed on the LMS Homepage by clicking on the “Home” drop down box and selecting “Learning,” scroll down to “Find Learning” and type in the Item ID or Course title in the search box:

Item ID:  HR-SMACourse Title:  SUCCESSION MANAGEMENT AWARENESS

The objective of the video training is to provide awareness information on the Defense Logistics Agency's Succession Management Process.  It specifically targets managers and supervisors but is beneficial for all DLA employees.  It’s not required training but recommended viewing for every employee.

View the Succession Management presentation.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Councils L&MCulture L&MDLA L&MPersonal Development L&MSupervisors L&MTraining L&MLeadership L&Mmanagement L&MProcess Management L&MSenior Leadership L&M