alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10866 and # 10867] 

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 1. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Kansas ( FEMA-1699-DR), dated 05/06/2007. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         05/04/2007 and continuing.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         05/11/2007.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/05/2007.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         02/06/2008.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Kansas, dated 05/06/2007 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster: 

*Primary Counties:*                     Edwards, Pratt, Stafford.                 

*Contiguous Counties:*                     Kansas: Barton, Hodgeman, Kingman, Pawnee, Reno, Rice.                 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

 [FR Doc. E7-9581 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Before The Second Division,

October 30, 1942

No. 47695.

#### Protest 73286-K of Sgt. Stanley Mitzen (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

From the official papers received in evidence at the hearing and the stipulation entered into between counsel it was shown that a Ford sedan was shipped by the Ford Motor Co. to the Panama Canal Zone; that at the time of said shipment from the United States no manufacturers’ excise tax was levied thereon; that thereafter the said automobile was imported by the party to whom it had been shipped at the Canal Zone, and that upon its entry at San Francisco the manufacturers’ excise tax was imposed by the collector. In view of article 271 of the Customs Regulations of 1937 that all laws affecting the importation of merchandise from foreign countries shall apply to merchandise coming from the Canal Zone, Isthmus of Panama, and seeking entry into the United States, it was held that the tax was properly levied in the absence of evidence that it had previously beén paid either by the Ford Motor Co. or by the purchaser. The protest was, therefore, overruled.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                                                                              |                                    |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                         |                               |
|         |                                                                                                                                                         | /s/              Lawrence Lok Yuen-Ming |
|         | Lawrence                Lok Yuen-MingChief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial Officer)Date:                 August 22, 2005 |
# C_2016260EN.01005201.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/52

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 June 2016 — Verile v Commission

(Case F-108/12) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer of pension rights acquired in a national pension scheme into the European Union pension scheme - Proposal concerning additional pensionable years - Action - Annulment - Appeal - Reclassification of claim for annulment of the proposal concerning additional pensionable years - Interpretation of the claim for annulment as a claim seeking annulment of the decision recognising additional pensionable years following the transfer of pension rights - Rejection of the claim - Judgment on appeal which has acquired the force of res judicata - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 260/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marco Verile (Cadrezzate, Italy) (represented by: initially by D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, É. Marchal, S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, then by D. de Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, then by S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers, and finally by J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by D. Martin and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, then by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, then by G. Gattinara, acting as Agent, and finally by G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision regarding the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights into the European Union pension scheme, a decision which applies the new general implementing provisions relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate in Case F-108/12, Verile v Commission. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate in Case F-108/12, Verile v Commission.

| 2. | Mr Marco Verile and the European Commission are each ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marco Verile and the European Commission are each ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 8.12.2012, p. 34.

1

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. FERNANDO NELSON AYALAR AM OS, a .k.a . Jose , a .k.a . Ne lson Fe rnando R am os-Ay a la , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-50481

D.C . No. 2:09-c r-00242-PA M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Pe rc y Ande rson, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d August 25, 2015 ** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , C LIFTON, a

nd HUR W ITZ, C irc u it Judge s. Fe rnando Ne lson Ay a la -R am o s a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt and c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 87-m onth se nte nc e for c onspira c y to inte rfe re with c om

m e rc e by robbe ry , in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . § 1951, a nd 

# FIL ED AUG 31 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).posse s sion of a fire arm in furthe ranc e of a

drug tra ffic k ing c rim e and a c rim e of viole nc e , in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . § 924(c )(1)(A). Pursuant to Ande rs v . C alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Aya l a -R am os’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating that the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

wa s c ounse l of re c o rd. W e have p rovide d Ay a la -R am os the opportunity to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our inde pe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua n t to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f a s to Ay a la -R am os’ s c onvic tion. W e a c c ordingly a ffirm Ay a la -R am os’ s c o nvic tion. Ay a la -R am os wa ive d the right to a p pe a l his se n te nc e . B e c a

use the re c ord disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to theva lidity of the se nte nc ing wa ive r, we dism iss Ay a la -R am os’ s a

ppe a l a s to his sen te nc e . Se e Unite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 4 - 5 0 4 8 1 2
Order entered October 20, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-16-00938-CV

SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant

V.

THE CITY OF DALLAS, ET AL., Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-00716-D



### ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright and Ju stice Lang-Miers and Justice Stoddart

We DENY appellant’s October 10, 2016 motion for appeal.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# MCSC teams with Marines to build world’s first continuous 3D-printed concrete barracks 

By Kaitlin Kelly, MCSC Office of Public Affairs and CommunicationMarine Corps Systems Command

                MARINE CORPS BASE QUANTICO, Va.   –              Marine Corps Systems CommandMCSC’s Operations and Programs/G-3*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Marine Corps Systems Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Marine Corps Systems Command3D printingAdditive ManufacturingconcreteHumanitarian ReliefHumanitarian Aid and Disaster ReliefI Marine Expeditioinary ForceU.S. Army Engineer Research and Development CenterConstructionequipmentConstruction & Equipment
Exhibit 99

TO: STEREOIDOGENESIS INHIBITORS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ("STGI")

This document is to confirm my agreement as a commitment for the continued
funding of monies to STGI up to the $2,000,000 I am committed to.

The agreement is as follows:

1. I will be a subscriber of common stock shares (the "Shares") in STGI for up
to $2,000,000, which Shares may be issued, at my election, to my company,
Oriental New Investments, Ltd., or myself.

2. My subscription shall be undertaken from time to time until January 1, 2001or
the subscription of up to $2,000,000 if same occurs sooner.

3. From time to time, up to a total of $2,000,000, upon "Notice" to me
requesting I subscribe, from STGI, I shall subscribe for the amount of shares
and at the price in the Notice, if same conforms to this document, and provided
the "Conditions" below are satisfied or in effect.

4. Upon receipt of the Notice, I shall undertake the subscription by payment of
the price for the Shares no later than 5 business days from the receipt of the
Notice. (The Notice may be supplied to me by fax.)

5. Payment of the subscription shall be made by wire transfer to STGI at a price
per share equal to 80% of the 30 day average low bid price for STGI shares as
quoted immediately preceding the delivery of the Notice to me.

6. The Shares will be issued to me by STGI within 5 business days of payment.

7. The Shares will be subject to the standard Rule 144 restrictive legend but
shall have piggyback registration rights so as to be included by STGI for sale
in any public registered offering, not including registrations for stock to
consultants or employees or registrations that cannot legally include the
Shares, during 12 months from the date of this document.

8. I am an "accredited investor" under Regulation D of the SEC (having net
assets in excess of $1,000,000 or income over $200,000 for each of the last two
years and expectation of same for this year). I have not relied upon any
statement or representations to me other than those expressly herein.

9. Any subscription shall only occur if the following "Conditions" are
satisfied:

a. STGI is in good standing in the State of Nevada;

b. STGI is a publicly trading company; and


                                        1
<PAGE>

c. STGI has not breached any promise to me herein.

The agreement herein is governed by Nevada law. This document cannot be amended
or assigned by me without the written consent of STGI, and may be executed in
counterparts. I agree to cooperate and sign reasonable documents as necessary to
give effect to the foregoing.

Date: Effective February 10, 2000


/s/ ALFRED PEEPER
---------------------------------
Alfred Peeper
(Oriental New Investments, Ltd.)
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries

The Company has twelve wholly-owned subsidiaries located throughout the world.
The wholly-owned subsidiaries are as follows:



|1. | Mannatech Australia Pty Limited
|-- | -------------------------------

|2. | Mannatech Japan, Inc.
|-- | ---------------------

|3. | Mannatech Korea, Ltd.
|-- | ---------------------

|4. | Mannatech Limited New Zealand
|-- | -----------------------------

|5. | Mannatech Limited, UK
|-- | ---------------------

|6. | Mannatech Taiwan Corporation
|-- | ----------------------------

|7. | Mannatech Taiwan Corporation Taiwan Branch
|-- | ------------------------------------------

|8. | Mannatech Foreign Sales Corporation
|-- | -----------------------------------

|9. | Mannatech Payment Services Incorporated
|-- | ---------------------------------------

|10. | Mannatech Products Company, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------

|11. | Internet Health Group, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------

|12. | Mannatech (International) Limited
|--- | ---------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7877

REGINALD SHERWOOD GRADY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. B. ZIEVERINK; MURIEL K. OFFERMAN; RON STARLING; WILLIAM L. PRITCHARD, Defendants - Appellees, and TIM BELL; BRADY N. THOMPSON; DANIEL PETERS; L. P. LEARNARD; L. R. SMITH; T. G. EFFLER; DONALD R. SMITH, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-94-5-BR) Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 22, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Reginald Sherwood Grady, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For the purpose of this appeal we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been given to prison officials for mailing. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 3 PER CURIAM: Reginald Sherwood Grady seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because Grady’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 15, 2001. Grady’s notice of appeal was filed on October 14, 2001. * Because Grady failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, W. Scott DeLoach, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                        
| |  | ------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
| |  |              |  | 
| |  | May 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    W. SCOTT DELOACH
| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                        
| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | W. Scott DeLoach       
| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
TIMOTHY A. TADLOCK, FORMER HUSBAND

,
Appellant,

v.

JULIE A. TADLOCK, FORMER WIFE

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1701

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 11, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County

. Dan Wilensky , Judge

.
Timothy A. Tadlock, pro se , Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, SWANSON

, and WINOKUR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. MARK PERRY, Defendant - Appellant. No. 09-30073 D.C. No. 4:08-CR-00092-BLW-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted March 4, 2010 Seattle, Washington Before: TASHIMA, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Mark Perry appeals the denial of sa fety valve protection under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) based on a finding that he credibly th reatened an informant. We affirm. In order to avoid an unnecessary cons titutional question, we assume for the sake of argument that the Fi rst Amendment applies to a ll aspects of sentencing and that a defendant therefore cannot be denied safety valve eligibility on the basis of a 

# FILED
MAR 24 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 “credible threat[] of violence,” 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(2), unless the defendant subjectively intends “to communicate a serious expression of intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals.” United States v. Cassel , 408 F.3d 622, 631 (9th Cir. 2005) (i nternal citations and quotation marks omitted). Although the district judge applied a standard that was objective in part, he also found that Perry intenti onally threatened a confidential informant in order to dissuade her from working with police in the future. The finding of an intentional threat was not clearly erroneous under the subjective standard. Perry conceded at argument that the burden of proof to establish all aspects of safety valv e eligibility rests on the defendant. See United States v. Ajugwo , 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 1996). As revealed by the audio tape, immediately after the informan t declined to use meth with Perry he asked her if she was wearing a wire and said that if she were, he would “fucking kill” her. There was evidence that it was a widely know n local law enforcement policy that informants are not permitted to use meth during controlled purchases. Moreover, the informant had laid out plans for futu re drugs sales, so it was not unreasonable for the district judge to find that Perry intended to dissuade her from cooperating with the police. AFFIRMED.