alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 96-1259.

#### Missouri *v.*Futo.

Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist. Certiorari denied.
----

**EXHIBIT 14.2**

***CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS***

 We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration  Statement on Form S-8 dated October 21, 2002, of Pacific Rim Mining Corp. (the  “Company”), of our report dated June 6, 2005, relating to the consolidated  financial statements of the Company which appear in the Annual Report on Form  20-F filed for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005. 

STALEY, OKADA & PARTNERS 

Chartered Accountants 

**“Staley, Okada & Partners”**

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 

July 28, 2005 

----
Webinar Attendees: Negotiated Rulemaking for Distribution Transformers Low-Voltage Working Group Meeting

Meeting Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax 

Allen, Ph.D., Jerry Transformer Technology 

Leader

Metglas, Inc. 440 Allied Drive Conway SC 29526 843-349-6810 843-349-6829 jerry.allen@m

Corel, Dale Sr. Design Engineer NEMA 9377 W. Higgins Rd. Rosemont IL 60018 N/A N/A dale.corel@eFreeman, Jeremiah Energy Analyst New West Technologies, LLC 1000 Independence Ave, 

SW

Washington DC 20585 N/A N/A jeremiah.free

Guilbault, Frank Manager - Product 

Development

Cogent Power Inc. 845 Laurentian Dr Burlington ON L7N3W7 N/A N/A frank.guilbau

Harden, Kenneth Sr Electrical Engineer Schneider Electric 6 Commercial Rd Huntington IN 46750 N/A N/A kenneth.hardKaja, Brian Core and Coil Design 

Engineer

GE Energy Distribution Transformers

7000 West Bert Kouns Industrial Loop

Shreverport LA 71129 N/A N/A brian.kaja@g

Kennedy, Chad Industry Standards 

Manager

Schneider Electric 8821 Garners Ferry Road Hopkins SC 29061 N/A N/A chad.kenned

Luo, Zhimei Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1801 K Street, NW, Suite 

500

Washington DC 20006 202-481-8333 202-973-2401 zhimei.luo@

Lyke, Richard F. Principal Engineer, 

Product Development & Applications Engineering

AK Steel Corporation 705 Curtis Street Middletown OH 45043-0001 513-425-5709 513-425-5866 richard.lyke@

May, Scott Senior Product Manager Siemens Industry Inc. 1320 Old Georgia Road Roebuck NC 29376 N/A N/A scott.may@sPatzner, Thomas Marketing Specialist Square D / Schneider Electric 1010 Airpark Center Drive Nashville TN 37217 615-844-8536 N/A thomas.patzn

thomas.patzn

Proctor, Thomas Consultant L-3 Communications, PPI 78770 Falsetto Drive Palm Desert CA 92211 N/A N/A natconsult@Rakowski, James Manager, Grain Oriented 

Electrical Steel Product Development

ATI Allegheny Ludlum 1300 Pacific Avenue Natrona 

Heights

PA 15065 724-226-6483 N/A jrakowski@a

james.rakow

Rosenfeld, Arthur H. Distinguished Scientist 

Emeritus

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)

160 Southampton Avenue Berkley CA 94707 916-495-2227 510-486-5454 AHRosenfeld

artrosenfeld@

Rossetti, John Systems Engineer Memphis Light Gas and Water 220 South Main Memphis TN 38103 N/A N/A jrossetti@mlgSavitz, Maxine Retired N/A 10350 Wilshire Blvd Honeywell CA 90024 N/A N/A maxinesavitzSmith, Robert Product Manager Federal Pacific 601 Old Airport Rd Bristol VA 24201 276-645-8836 N/A bsmith@fede
# C_2013026EN.01007702.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/77

---

Action brought on 21 November 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-143/12)

2013/C 26/162

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi, A. Tymen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of EPSO not to include the applicant in the list of persons who have passed the tests at the end of the programme raining which is part of the certification procedure and a claim for damages.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of EPSO of 16 December 2011 excluding the applicant from the list of officials who have received certification under the 2010-2011 certification exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of EPSO of 16 December 2011 excluding the applicant from the list of officials who have received certification under the 2010-2011 certification exercise;

| — | as necessary, annul the decision of EPSO of 16 August 2012 rejecting the applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

as necessary, annul the decision of EPSO of 16 August 2012 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;

| — | award damages of EUR 5 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

award damages of EUR 5 000;

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs.

---
No. 47616.

#### Protests 988132-G, etc., of John Alban & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

*426Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Thomas CLEMENTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 97-05266.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 28, 1999.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Angela D. McCravy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Clements challenges his conviction and habitual offender sentence for sexual battery. We affirm the conviction and sentence in all respects, however remand the judgment to correct a scrivener’s error. The jury found Clements guilty of sexual battery in violation of section 794.011(5), Florida Statutes (1997), a second-degree felony; however, the judgment reflects a conviction for sexual battery with great force likely to cause serious injury, a life felony.1 We note that Clements was properly sentenced. Nevertheless the scrivener’s error would result in a higher guidelines score and more severe penalty if Clements is ever sentenced for subsequent offenses. The judgment should, therefore, be corrected on remand.

BLUE, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and STRINGER, JJ„ Concur.

1

. See § 794.011(3), Fla. Stat. (1997).
# C_2013071EN.01002803.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/28

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-95/12)

(Civil service - Article 34(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings signed by means of a stamp reproducing a lawyer’s signature or other means of reproduction - Action lodged out of time - Manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 71/48

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to withhold amounts from the applicant’s invalidity allowance for the purpose of recovering the sum of EUR 3 000 paid to the applicant in compliance with an judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal which was subsequently set aside by the General Court of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Nebraska Book Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark W.
Oppegard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



                                                 /s/  Mark W. Oppegard
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Mark W. Oppegard
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 June 25, 2004
**Exhibit 31.2**CertificationsI, Suki Mudan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, of Caneum, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 

 
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:August 17, 2006
Before the Second Division,

August 3, 1938

No. 39146.

#### Protests 166355-G, etc., of H. Kayser & Fils, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) embroidered net trimmings, galloons, ornaments, and laces at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, *Pustet*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Abstract 12555 followed; (2) shawls and trimmings in chief value of artificial silk as articles in chief value of compounds of cellulose at 60 percent under paragraph 31, Abstract 37230 followed; (3) artificial flowers at 60 percent under paragraph 1419, *Robinson-Goodman*v. *United States*(17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) followed; (4) hats in chief value of silk at 60 percent under paragraph 1210; (5) hats in chief value of straw at 60 percent under paragraph 1406; (6) bands, braids, hats, trimmings, and ribbons in chief value of cellulose filaments at 60 percent under paragraph 31, *Aniberg*v. *United States*(T. D. 46204) followed; and (7) fur felt hats at the appropriate rate according to value, plus 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1427, Abstract 10245 followed.
# C_2012366EN.01002402.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/24

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel (Luxembourg) lodged on 27 August 2012 — État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines v Edenred Luxembourg SA

(Case C-395/12)

2012/C 366/42

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines

Applicants:

Defendant: Edenred Luxembourg SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are services carried out by an organisation issuing luncheon vouchers in Luxembourg for a restaurateur who is a member of its acceptance network exempt, either in full or in part, from VAT pursuant to Article 13B(d)(3) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended, if a luncheon voucher is not a fully-fledged financial security and those services are not intended to guarantee payment for a meal purchased by an employee of the business customer (ibid. Article 13B(d)(2)), in the case of luncheon vouchers allocated by an employer to its employees under the State legislation ..., given that membership of a luncheon vouchers network allows a member to profit from the custom of employees of the business customers of the luncheon voucher operator and that that operator is paying the processing costs for those luncheon vouchers?

1

ibid.

---

(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Can they fix it? Yes, they can!

By Airman 1st Class Greg Erwin18th Wing Public Affairs

                KADENA AIR BASE, Japan  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Kadena Air Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Kadena Air Base18th Logistics Readiness Squadronmaintenancevehicle maintenancegovernment vehicle
- 1

- Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

s ascha.vanderbellen@ delta .com

April 1 , 201 3

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and AeroMexico

For Detroit

- Monterrey Service

Docket s DOT

- OST

- 2013

- 0062 , DOT

- OST

- 1997

- 3289 , & DOT

- OST

- 2000

- 7708

Dear Ms. Rosenberg :

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carrier s on the service list to the above

referenced application and t here are no objec tions. In these circumstances, we urge that the

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT

Bob Finamore , DOT

info@airlineinfo.com
# C_2013141EN.01000801.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/8

---

Appeal brought on 8 June 2012 by Zdeněk Altner against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 23 March 2012 in Case T-535/11 Altner v Commission

(Case C-289/12 P)

2013/C 141/12

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Zdeněk Altner (represented by: J. Čapek, advokát)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 7 March 2013 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Zdeněk Altner to bear his own costs.

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

March 26, 2007

Before

Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 05-4034

JOSEPH BAPTIST, 

RICHARD BROOKS, PRICE

DUMAS, WILLIE HUNT, and

LAMONT UPTON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY OF KANKAKEE and 

MIKE KINKADE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the 

Central District of Illinois.

No. 03 C 2115

Michael P. McCuskey, 

Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion issued March 19, 2007, is amended as follows:

Remove the following sentence and citation from the slip opinion, p. 8: “The

enforceability of a Title VII settlement is a question of federal law, under which an

oral settlement constitutes a binding contract if there was an offer, an acceptance,

and consideration. Taylor, 793 F.2d at 862.”

Substitute the following sentence in its place: “Whether a Title VII

settlement was knowing and voluntary is a question of federal law, Pierce, 65 F.3d

at 571, but the question of whether the parties entered into an enforceable oral

settlement agreement is governed by state law, and oral settlement agreements are
No. 05-4034 Page 2

enforceable contracts under Illinois law. Lynch, Inc. v. SamataMason Inc., 279 F.3d

487, 490 (7th Cir. 2002).”

Add the following parenthetical on p. 9, immediately following the citation to

Wagner v. NutraSweet Co., 95 F.3d 527, 532 (7th Cir. 1996): “(Illinois law).”
Before the Second Division,

August 8, 1938

No. 39163.

#### Protests 132772-G, etc., of I. Magnin & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items consist of embroidered articles in part of lace similar to those involved in *Pustet*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of United Road Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge: 1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/   Michael A. Wysocki
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer



/s/   Patrick J. Fodale
----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer



Date: April 14, 2003
```

[115th Congress Public Law 204]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Public Law 115-204
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
      To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
      hydroelectric project. <<NOTE: July 23, 2018 -  [H.R. 951]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) <<NOTE: Time period.>> In General.--Notwithstanding the time 
period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) 
that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
project numbered 12642, the Commission may, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance 
with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of 
that section and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend 
the time period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 
the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by the 
Commission.

    (b) <<NOTE: Effective dates.>> Reinstatement of Expired License.--If 
the period required for commencement of construction of the project 
described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Commission may reinstate the license 
effective as of the date of its expiration and the first extension 
authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of such 
expiration.

    Approved July 23, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 951:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-172 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 163 (2017):
                                    June 12, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 164 (2018):
                                    June 28, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```