alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AD RI AN A G UERR ER O- HERNAN DEZ, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72942 A ge nc yN o. A 086- 966- 728 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof I m m i gr a t i on a nd C us t om s E nf or c e m e nt S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A dr i a naG ue rr e r o- H e rna nde z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or r e vi e w of

a n I m m i gr a t i on a nd C us t om s E nf or c e m e ntde c i s i on r e i ns t a t i ng he rpr i or r e m ova l or de r . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo 

# FI LED JU L 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72942 2 q u e s tio n s o f

law a n ddu e p r o c e s s c la im s . G ar c i a de R i nc on v . D e p’ t H om e land Se c u r ity , 5 3 9 F . 3 d1 1 3 3 , 1 1 3 6 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. C on traryt o G uerr er o-H ernand ez ’ s c on t ent i on , 8 U . S . C . § 1 23 1(a) (5) app l i es to h e re x p e d ite dr e m o v a l o r d e r . See M oralez -I zqui erdo v. G on zales , 486 F . 3d 484, 496 n. 14 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( e n ba nc ) ( “ A nym ode of de partur e - vol unt aryor i nvol unt a ry- w hi l e s ubj e c tt o a n or de rof r e m ova l c ons t i tut e s ar e m ova l f or re i nst at em entpu rposes . ”) . T h e r e in s ta te m e n t o f

G u e rr e r o - H e rn an d e z ’s r e m o v a l o r d e rd idn o t v io la te h e rdu e p r o c e s s r ig h ts . Se e id . at49 7 (“ R ei nst at em entof a pri or re m ov alorder - r e ga r dl e s s of

the pr oc e s s a f

f or de d i n the unde r l y i ng or de r- doe s notof f e nd due pr oc e s s be c aus e r e i ns t a t e m e ntof apr i oror de rdoe s notc hange the a l i e n’ s r i ght s or re m edi es . ”) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

----

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Thomas Henry Glocer, Chief Executive of Reuters Group PLC (the “Company”) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

a) The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

b) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

| Dated: 9 March 2005 |   | By /s/ Thomas H. Glocer         |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                |   |                            |
|                |   | Thomas H. GlocerChief Executive |

 

----
No. 39169.

#### Protests 707875-G, etc., of China Pacific Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *American Push Broom & Brush Co.*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 248, T. D. 49391) the palmyra fiber in question was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1684 as claimed.
# C_2018445EN.01001401.xml

| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2018 — Bacardi v EUIPO — Palírna U Zeleného stromu (42 BELOW)

(Case T-435/12) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark 42 BELOW - Non-registered earlier national figurative mark VODKA 42 - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Use in the course of trade - Application of national law by EUIPO))

(2018/C 445/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bacardi Co. Ltd (Vaduz, Liechtenstein) (represented initially by M. Reinisch and subsequently by A. Parassina, L. Rigas and L. Lorenc, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by P. Geroulakos, and subsequently by D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Palírna U Zeleného stromu a.s., formerly Granette & Starorežná Distilleries a.s. (Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic) (represented by T. Chleboun, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 July 2012 (Case R 2100/2011-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Granette & Starorežná Distilleries and Bacardi.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Bacardi Co. Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bacardi Co. Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Military Aids Disaster Response Effort in the Aftermath of Hurricane Florence

By Navy Lt. Haider MullickU.S. Army North

                RALEIGH, N.C.  –              

                Soldiers with the 74th Composite Truck Company, 129th Combat Support Sustainment Battalion, 101st Sustainment Brigade, 101st Airborne Division rest at Fort Bragg, N.C., Sept. 22, 2018. The soldiers have been conducting high-water rescue and relief operations in Lumberton, N.C. The soldiers deployed from Fort Campbell, Ky., to assist with the response to Hurricane Florence. Courtesy photo            

                Soldiers Rest            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Courtesy photo

VIRIN: 180922-N-XX374-131

**Team Effort****Soldiers Support Disaster Response Mission****‘The People Are Very Grateful’***Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Defense Department website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Stories

Northern Command Provides DoD Hurricane Support Update

U.S. Northern CommandHurricane Florence
# C_2014421EN.01003401.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Alro v Commission

(Case T-517/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Electricity - Preferential tariffs - Decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU - Action for annulment - Act not open to challenge - Aid measure fully implemented, in part, as at the date of the decision and, in part, when the action was brought - Inadmissibility))

2014/C 421/46

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alro SA (Slatina, Romania) (represented by: C. Quigley QC, O. Bretz, Solicitor, and S. Verschuur, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 2517 final of 25 April 2012 to initiate the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU into State aid SA 33624 (2012/C) (2011/NN) — Romania — Preferential electricity tariffs granted to Alro Slatina SA and, in the alternative, for annulment of Decision C(2012) 2517 final in so far as it applies to the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2009.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2) | Orders Alro SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Alro SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 2. 2. 2013.

1

---
#### Harry J. Winick et al., Copartners Practicing Law under the Name of Winick, Hoffman & Grumet, Plaintiffs, *v.*Juliette S. Jackson, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

March 23, 1966.

*Harry J. Winick and others,*plaintiffs in person. *Julius Wolf son*for defendant.

Frank A. Gulotta, J.

Motion to strike defense as insufficient in law is denied.

The hiring of a New York attorney by an out-of-State domiciliary to represent her in a probate proceeding pending in this State does not constitute doing business within the State within the meaning of CPLR 302 (subd. [a], par. 1).

In *Schneider*v. *J. & C. Carpet Co.*(23 A D 2d 103) jurisdiction was sustained on the theory that the acts of the plaintiff himself, performed in New York as sales representative and employee of defendant, were defendant’s acts and attributable to it. That is not true of an attorney who is more in the position of an independent contractor much like that of the plaintiff in *Millner*v. *Noudar, Lda.*(24 A D 2d 326) who was an independent commission broker with whom the defendant entered into a written contract for exclusive representation. That case held that the acts of the plaintiff in performance of the contract were not attributable to the defendant and jurisdiction was sustained, only because officers of defendant corporation had visited New York in furtherance of the performance of the contract sued on.

Neither has the simple mailing of a contract into the State, other than an insurance contract *(McGee*v. *International Life Ins. Co.,*355 U. S. 220; Insurance Law, § 59-a) been held sufficient to confer jurisdiction.

On the factual showing made on this motion the defense must be allowed to stand.
# C_2012366EN.01003404.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/34

---

Order of the General Court of 9 October 2012 — Région Poitou-Charentes v Commission

(Case T-31/12) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Structural Funds - Measure not subject to review - Measure in part informative and in part preparatory - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 366/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Région Poitou-Charentes (France) (represented by: J. Capiaux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and A. Steiblytė, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the Commission’s letter of 18 November 2011, mentioning as its subject: ‘Closure of the program “Atlantic Area” 2000-2006, Approval of the Final Report, CCI: 2001 RG 16 0PC 006’.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The Région Poitou-Charentes shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Région Poitou-Charentes shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Henry J. Boucher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

Theforegoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liabilityunder this section.  This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1is expressly incorporated by reference in any such filing.

 
| Dated: November 18, 2005 | /s/Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.    |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer       |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 96-1043.

#### Gilmore, Warden *v.*Emerson.

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****2007 census of agriculture.Volume 1, Part 43, Geographic area series. Texas, state and county data[electronic resource**
 
Parts: Vol 1 A | Vol 1 B
 
SuDoc Number:A 92.53/43:AC-07-A-43
Item Number:0015-B-43 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000656550
 
January 8, 2020
# C_2015346EN.01001502.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2015 — Ministry of Energy of Iran v Council

(Case T-564/12) (1)

1

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Error of assessment - Breach of fundamental rights - Proportionality))

(2015/C 346/17)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ministry of Energy of Iran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: M. Lester, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and A. De Elera, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 58) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 of 15 October 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 282, p. 16).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Ministry of Energy of Iran to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Ministry of Energy of Iran to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.

1

---
STATE OF NEW YORK 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

ONE COMMERCE PLAZA 

ANDREW M. CUOMO 99 WASHINGTON AVENUE CESAR A. PERALES GOVERNOR ALBANY, NY 12231-0001 SECRETARY OF STATE 

October 4,2012 

Mr. John Filippelli, Director 

Division of Environmental Planning and Protection 

u. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 2, NPDES Section 

290 Broadway, 25th Floor 

New York, NY 10007-1866 

Re: F-2011-1041 (DA) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - Submission of 

a consistency Determination for Two DRAFT NPDES permits 

for discharges incidental to the normal operation of vessels, the 

Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) and the Vessel General 

Permit (VGP). 

Conditioned Concurrence with Consistency Determination 

Dear Mr. Filippelli: 

The Department of State has completed its review of the EPA's consistency determination regarding the 

consistency of the 2013 Drafts sVGP and VGP with the New York State Coastal Management Program. 

Based upon the information submitted, the Department of State concurs with the EPA's consistency determination 

for the draft Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) without condition. 

Based upon the information submitted, the Department of State concurs with the EPA's consistency determination 

for the Vessel General Permit (VGP) subject to the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Final Water 

Quality Certification: Proposed 2013 VGP & s VGP - September 2012 conditions. The DEC water quality 

certification conditions will also be incorporated into the EPA Final Permit for vessels operating within or may 

affect the coastal area of New York. 

Please contact Jeffrey Zappieri at: (518) 474-6000 if you have any questions. 

S7j;; J;J G~orge R. Stafford 

Deputy Secretary of State 

GRS/jls 

Attachment: 	 New York Department of Environmental Conservation Final Water Quality Certification: 

Proposed 2013 VGP & s VGP - September 2012 

WWW.DOS.NY.GOV E-MAIL: INFO@DOS.NY.GOV
No. 96-5974.

#### Audia *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
CONFIDENTIAL-SPECIAL HANDLING
December 9, 2005
David Drinkwater
100 Highland Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
M4W 2A6
    
    (LOGO)
     Salary
  Incentive Award
  Long Term Incentive Awards




---



##### 



Benefits
     Capital Accumulation and Retirement Programs (CARP)
  Reporting Insider
  2




---



##### 



Share Ownership Guidelines
  Tax Conflict Review for Board Appointed Officers
  Change in Control
  Executive Travel Services
 
 Statement of
Understanding and Consent
  3




---



##### 



/s/ Mike Zafirovski
 
 
 th
  th
 
 
  4
99-0649 (La. 4/23/99)

#### Lisa Winters McCLELLAND on Behalf of the Minor Child, Alexandra Ann WINTERS v. Abby James BROUSSARD.

No. 99-C-0649.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Broussard, Abby James; — Defendants); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Lafayette 15th Judicial District Court Div. “C” Number 88-4228; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CA98-0906

Denied.

VICTORY, J. would grant the writ.

TRAYLOR, J. not on panel.
[941084359       $30.00]
[SOS 07-27-94    13:11 ]

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE
                              ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          JONES NAUGHTON ENTERTAINMENT INC.

Pursuant to Section 7-2-109 of the Colorado Corporation Code -(the
"Code"), Jones Naughton Entertainment, Inc. hereby submits the following
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.

FIRST:

The name of the Corporation is Jones Naughton Entertainment, Inc.

SECOND:

Article 4 of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

                                  ARTICLE 4

The corporation shall have authority to issue shares as follows:

4.01 One hundred million (100,000,000) shares of common stock, with
no par value. Each share of common stock shall entitle the holder
thereof to one (1) vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a
meeting of shareholders.

4.02 Ten million (10,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, with no par
value, to be issued in the form and manner, with the relative
rights, preferences, qualifications, limitations or restrictions
thereon as the Board of Directors shall determine.

4.03 Cumulative voting shall not be allowed in the election of
Directors.

<PAGE>

THIRD:

The above Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was
adopted by the Company's shareholders on June 8, 1994.

FOURTH:

The designation and number of shares outstanding and entitled to
vote at the time of adoption of the Articles of Amendment to the
Articles of Incorporation were 7,157,757 shares of Common Stock;
and the number of such shares represented at such vote were
3,738,000 The total number of votes cast in favor of the Articles
of amendment to the Articles of Incorporation were 3,738,000 Such
3,738,000 shares cast in favor of such Amendments were sufficient
for approval.

FIFTH:

The Articles of Amendment do not provide for the exchange,
reclassification or cancellation of issued shares.

In witness whereof, Jones Naughton Entertainment, Inc. has
executed these Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
as of the 8th day of June, 1994.

Jones Naughton Entertainment, Inc.


By:  /s/Michael D. English
Its:  President

By:  /s/Joseph M. Naughton
Its:  Secretary


Attest:Verified

By:/s/Joseph M. Naughton
Secretary

<PAGE>

STATE OF CALIFORNIA      )
                         ) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES    )

On the 10th day of June, 1994, personally appeared before me
Michael D. English and Joseph M. Naughton who being duly sworn did
say, that they are respectively the President and the Secretary of
Jones Naughton Entertainment, Inc., and that the within and foregoing
instrument was signed on'W of saidpany by authority of the approval of
the shareholders of said Company.

/s/Grace M. Westlund
NOTARY PUBLIC

(OFFICIAL SEAL)
(NORARY PUBLICE-CALIFORNIA]

/s/Grace M. Westlund
NOTARY PUBLIC

(OFFICIAL SEAL)
(NORARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA]