alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Vehicle Management welds fuel tanks back to life

By Staff Sgt. Joshua King386th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs

                SOUTHWEST ASIA  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

386th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadronvehicle maintenancerepairmaintenance
Order entered September 19, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01390-CR

ERNESTO JENNINGS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-31021-W

ORDER

This appeal was previously abated for a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief, 

originally due in March 2016, had not been filed. The trial court found, and this Court adopted 

the finding, that appellant would file his brief by August 15, 2016. To date, no brief has been 

filed, and appellate counsel has had no communication with the Court. 

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal and whether 

retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot 

obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s 

absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per 
curiam). If counsel has abandoned the appeal, the trial court is ORDERED to take such 

measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, including appointment of 

new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Order entered October 20, 2016 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00938-CV 

SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant 

V. 

THE CITY OF DALLAS, ET AL., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-00716-D 

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justice Lang-Miers and Justice Stoddart 

We DENY appellant’s October 10, 2016 motion for appeal. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT 

 CHIEF JUSTICE
# C_2012343EN.01000601.xml

| 10.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Rostock (Germany) lodged on 13 August 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Per Harald Lökkevik

(Case C-384/12)

2012/C 343/05

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Rostock

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Per Harald Lökkevik

Other party: Staatsanwaltschaft Rostock

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Should the concept of an advantage within the meaning of Article 4(3) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 (1) be interpreted as meaning that it includes a situation in which it appears that simply a lack of competence of the European Commission has been brought about by statements made in a subsidy procedure for the purposes of avoiding the prescribed notification of regional investment aid projects with total project costs of at least EUR 50 million laid down in Section 2(1)(i) of the Multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects of 7 April 1998 (OJ 1998 C 107, p. 7)?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Nortel Networks Limited, a Canadian corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                    |  |  |  |                                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ MIKE S. ZAFIROVSKI                               
|                    |  |  |  | Mike S. Zafirovski                                   
|                    |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ PAVITER S. BINNING                               
|                    |  |  |  | Paviter S. Binning                                   
|                    |  |  |  | Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Restructuring Officer
----

**EXHIBIT 14.1**

**SRK CONSULTING Engineers and Scientists**  Steffen Robertson and Kirsten (U.S.), Inc.   7175 West Jefferson Avenue, Suite 3000   Lakewood, Colorado, 80235, USA 

July26, 2005 

 Pacific Rim Mining Corp.   Suite 410 - 625 Howe Street   Vancouver, B.C. V6C 2T6 

 Re:   Pacific Rim Mining Corp. 

 Ladies and Gentlemen:

 In connection with the filing of this annual report on Form  20-F of Pacific Rim Mining Corp. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 (the  “Form 20-F”), we hereby consent to the reference of the description  of the reports prepared by us titled Final Pre-Feasibility Report El Dorado  Project, El Salvador dated January 21, 2005, (the “Pre-Feasibility Report");  to the written disclosures and extracts from the Pre-Feasibility Report or a  summary of the Pre-Feasibility Report in the written disclosure contained in  the Form 20-F; the description of certain mineral resource estimates and other  information pertaining to the properties described in the Pre-Feasibility Report  and to the use of our name in the Form 20-F as a named expert. 

Yours truly,  

*“Nick Michael”*

Senior Mineral Economist 

----
***Exhibit 32***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q of ComCam International, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Don Gilbreath, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

Date: August 19, 2011

 

 

/s/ Don Gilbreath

Don Gilbreath, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
### PHANTOM 3 STANDARD Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 9 . 7 Overview : 1. All
- in
- O ne f irmware version updated to : v 1. 1. 0030 2. DJI GO app iOS version updated to: v 2.2.0 3. DJI GO app Android version updated to: v 2.1.0


### What ’s New : 1. Added Intelligent Navigation Modes including Point of Interest, Follow Me and Waypoint. 

### Bug Fixes : 1. Wi
- Fi extender failed to respond during the linking process. 2. Users could not reset the W i
- Fi extender password from the DJI GO app. 3. Users could not initiate the linking process from the DJI GO app. 4. Users could not customize the control stick modes in the DJI GO app
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SERGIO RUBEN GARCIA-CHAVIRA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70508 

Agency No. A097-422-245 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 13, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Sergio Ruben Garcia-Chavira, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying cancellation of removal. Our 

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 20 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-70508 

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part 

and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Contrary to Garcia-Chavira’s contention, the BIA used the proper “futureoriented” standard in determining that he failed to show exceptional and extremely 

unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Figueroa v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 487, 

497-98 (9th Cir. 2008) (agency must conduct a “future-oriented analysis” in 

determining whether “removal would result in an exceptional and extremely 

unusual hardship” to qualifying relatives (emphasis in original)). We otherwise 

lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary hardship determination. See 

Vilchiz-Soto v. Holder, 688 F.3d 642, 644 (9th Cir. 2012) (absent a colorable legal 

or constitutional claim, the court lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s 

discretionary hardship determination).

Because the BIA conducted a de novo review of the hardship determination, 

we do not consider Garcia-Chavira’s challenges to the IJ’s hardship determination. 

See Romero-Ruiz v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1057, 1061 (9th Cir. 2008) (“Where the 

BIA conducts an independent review of the IJ’s findings, we review the BIA’s 

decision and not that of the IJ.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
**Exhibit 31.2**
Certifications
I, Gary Allhusen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,2007, of Caneum, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
 b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small businessissuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 21, 2007
/s/ GaryAllhusen
No. 45250.

#### Protests 43757-K, etc., of Ernst Bremermann *&*Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of peat moss of the-same character as that passed upon in *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.44

                       Amendment to EMPLOYMENT Agreement

     THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into effective as of
March 9, 2000, by and between Harold W. Borhauer (the "Employee") and United
Road Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee have entered into that certain
Employment Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2000 (the "Original Agreement");
and

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the definition of
"Change of Control" in the Original Agreement to provide that a Change of
Control includes a change in control of the Company's Board of Directors that
results from a sale of the Company's securities.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto hereby agree:

     1.  The Original Agreement is hereby amended by deleting Section 4(b)(iv)
of the Original Agreement in its entirety and replacing said Section 4(b)(iv)
with the following:

          "(iv) any time that, as a result of or in connection with a tender
          offer, sale of securities, merger, consolidation, sale of assets or
          contested election, or any combination of such transactions, the
          persons who were directors of the Company immediately before such
          transaction or event cease to constitute a majority of the Board of
          Directors of the Company or of any successor to the Company at any
          time within one year after such transaction or event, or"

     2.  All remaining provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment to Option
Agreement as of the date first above written.

EMPLOYEE          UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC.



By: /s/ H W Borhauer                    By: /s/ Gerald R. Riordan
    ---------------------                   --------------------------
    Harold W. Borhauer                      Gerald R. Riordan
    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-74124, Form S-8 No. 333-55364, Form S-8/S-3 No. 333-34202 and Form S-8 No. 333-42952) pertaining to the 1998 Stock Plan, as
amended, the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 1999 Directors Option Plan, the Holographix Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan, as amended, the Holographix Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and the Lambdaflex Inc. 2000 Stock Plan, and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-74126) and in the related Prospectuses of Avanex Corporation of our report dated July 31, 2001 (except for Note 14, Restatement of Financial Statements, as to which the date is May 23, 2002) with respect
to the consolidated financial statements, as amended, and schedule of Avanex Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended June 30, 2001.





/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP





San Jose, California


May 23, 2002
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# A fuels family

By Senior Airman Philip Bryant

                BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Barksdale Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

2nd Logistics Readiness SquadronPOLBarksdale Air Force BasefuelPetroleum Oils and Lubricants
No. 48157.

#### Protests 856662-G, etc., of F. Blumenthal & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 47291 the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
No. 42099.

#### Protests 942539-G, etc., of Santo Alioto & Sons et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the authority of Abstract 40880 the protests were sustained.