alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012331EN.01003301.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/33

---

Action brought on 21 August 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-89/12)

(2012/C 331/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision not to regrade the applicant.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision adopted on 10 May 2012 by the Director of Directorate D of DG Human Resources and Security and sent to the applicant by note of 11 May 2012 rejecting the applicant’s claim of 25 January 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision adopted on 10 May 2012 by the Director of Directorate D of DG Human Resources and Security and sent to the applicant by note of 11 May 2012 rejecting the applicant’s claim of 25 January 2012;

| — | In so far as necessary, annul the decision of 21 November 2011 rejecting the applicant’s request of 29 June 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

In so far as necessary, annul the decision of 21 November 2011 rejecting the applicant’s request of 29 June 2011;

| — | Order the defendant to take the corrective measures necessary to re-establish compliance with the principle of career equivalence as regards the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to take the corrective measures necessary to re-establish compliance with the principle of career equivalence as regards the applicant;

| — | Order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay all the costs.

---
Additional NHPA Consultation Documents (Updated September 30, 2015)

Proposed PSD Permit

Amendment for the MCU Facility
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 51205 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. CARM EL O CARR AS CO- HERRERA D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 1 : 0 8 - CR- 3 2 3 - ALL B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , C L E M E N T , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der app o in ted to r epresent C arm el o C arrascoH erre ra h a s m ov ed for l ea ve to w i th d ra w an d h a s f i l ed a b ri ef i n acco rd a n ce w i th A n d er s v . Ca lif

o rn ia , 3 86 U . S . 7 38 ( 19 67 ) . Car r as c o - H e r r e r a ha s no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . O uri nde pe nde ntre vi e w of t he re c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no n on frivo l ou s is s u e for ap p ea l . A ccord i n gly, cou n sel’ s m oti on f or leav e to w i t hdr aw i s G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po ns ibi l i t i e s he r e i n, a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

16, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted),Edward A. Keible, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Endwave Corporation (the “Company”), and Brett W.Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:     **1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the ***“Quarterly Report”***) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and     **2. **The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     **InWitness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto asof the 6th day ofAugust, 2007.     /s/ Edward A. Keible, Jr.   /s/ Brett W. Wallace     Edward A. Keible, Jr.   Brett W. WallaceChief Executive Officer   Chief Financial OfficerThis certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofEndwave Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. sec. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A forthe period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr.,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  September 23, 2004 | /s/Henry J.  Boucher, Jr.              |   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Henry J.  Boucher, Jr.,                |
|                       | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.11

                                    ADDENDUM


        This ADDENDUM ("Addendum"),  dated March 29, 2002 and effective February
28, 2000, amends and supplements the Memorandum of Understanding ("Memorandum"),
dated July 1, 1999, between Nebraska Book Company,  Inc. ("Company") and Alan G.
Siemek ("Executive") as follows:

1. On May  10,  2000,  Company  entered  into a  Management  Services  Agreement
("Agreement") with  TheCampusHub.com,  Inc.  ("CampusHub"),  under which Company
agreed to supervise and manage the day-to-day operations of CampusHub.

2. On or about February 28, 2000,  CampusHub  offered Executive a position as an
executive  officer of CampusHub.  Such position  would not require the full time
and  attention  of  Executive.  Executive  desires to accept the position and to
continue in his present position with Company.

3. Having  investigated  the  circumstances  of CampusHub's  offer to Executive,
Company  acknowledges  and agrees that  Executive's  employment  as an executive
officer of CampusHub would not  substantially  interfere with the performance of
Executive's duties under the Memorandum and,  consequently,  has no objection to
Executive accepting CampusHub's offer.

4. The parties acknowledge and agree that, to the extent Executive is performing
services  on behalf of  Company,  including,  but not  limited  to,  services in
furtherance of Company's  obligations  under the Agreement,  Executive  shall be
subject to the direction and control of the board of directors of Company,  but,
to the extent Executive is performing services on behalf of CampusHub, Executive
is subject to the direction and control of the board of directors of CampusHub.


                                        NEBRASKA BOOK COMPANY, INC.


                                        By:  /s/ Mark W. Oppegard
                                        --------------------------
                                        Mark W. Oppegard
                                        Chief Executive Officer,
                                        President and Director


                                        EXECUTIVE


                                        By:  /s/ Alan G. Siemek
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Alan G. Siemek
# C_2012295EN.01001801.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 29 June 2012 — J. Sebastian Guevara Kamm v TAM Airlines S.A./TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A.

(Case C-316/12)

2012/C 295/30

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: J. Sebastian Guevara Kamm

Applicant:

Defendant: TAM Airlines S.A./TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 2(j) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted, with regard to the ‘reasonable grounds’ mentioned therein, to the effect that ‘reasonable grounds’ can only be grounds pertaining to the person of the passenger which jeopardise the safety of air transport or of other passengers or which affect other public or contractual interests, or can ‘reasonable grounds’ also be other grounds not pertaining to the person of the passenger, in particular cases of force majeure?

1

force majeure

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
No. 40457.

#### Protest 948772-G/87824 of Fee & Stemwedel, Inc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

On the authority of *United States*v. *Oppleman*(25 C. C. P. A. 168, T. D. 49271) the barometer movements in question were held dutiable at 27)4 percent under paragraph 372.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ISSUER'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,103,619
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      18,128,740
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         432,649
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        17,762,460
<LOANS>                                     89,077,218
<ALLOWANCE>                                    750,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             133,525,602
<DEPOSITS>                                  89,529,242
<SHORT-TERM>                                27,522,578
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,319,093
<OTHER-SE>                                     154,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             133,525,602
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,608,238
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              362,435
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               251,271
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,221,946
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,661,739
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             555,904
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,004,303
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  100,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,834,290
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                304,884
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.51
<LOANS-NON>                                     23,128
<LOANS-PAST>                                   788,788
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               776,502
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  132,764
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,284
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              750,022
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           750,022
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
No. 54331.

#### Simon Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 156157-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal bags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg*& *Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### F. C. Gerlach & Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6479.

Entry No. 754053, etc.

Invoices dated Stourbridge, England, April 23, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 8, 1942, etc.

(Decided October 30, 1946)

*Benjamin A. Levett*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olives, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before the First Division,

May 25, 1950

No. 54349.

#### Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 154060-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of the essential and distilled oil of amyris balsamifera, which oil differs chemically from true sandalwood oil, and that following the decisions in *Nylos Trading Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 86, C. D. 1133), affirmed in *Same*v. *Same*(37 C. C. P. A. 71, C. A. D. 422), and *Fritzsche Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), importations of such oil would now be classified as all other essential and distilled oils, not specially provided for. Applying the principles of the cited decisions to the facts in the case at bar as established by the stipulation the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-21704, No. 33-24096, No. 33-37300, No. 33-65104,No. 33-56717, No. 333-42903, No. 333-59811, No. 333-61214, No. 333-117850 and No. 333-151399 on Form S-8 and No. 333-47909 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 26, 2009 (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of two new accounting standards), relating to the consolidated financial statements of The McClatchy Company, and the effectiveness of The McClatchy Company’sinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The McClatchy Company for the year ended December 28, 2008. 

 

/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Sacramento, California 

February 26, 2009
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Agencies integrate to fulfill European mission

By Airman 1st Class Octavius Thompson39th Air Base Wing Public Affairs

                INCIRLIK AIR BASE, Turkey  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Incirlik Air Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

728th Air Mobility Squadron521st Air Mobility Operations Wing39th Air Base WingIncirlik Air Basetransportationdeliverycargo
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**








I,
      Geoffrey Donaldson, Chief Executive Officer of Versadial, Inc. (the “Company”),
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter year
              ended
              December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C
              78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:
      February 19, 2008





/s/
                Geoffrey DonaldsonGeoffrey
                DonaldsonChief
                Executive Officer




I,
      Karen
      Nazzareno, Controller of Versadial, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
              December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C
              78m or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated:
      February 19, 2008





/s/
                Karen NazzarenoKaren
                NazzarenoController
# C_2013026EN.01007502.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/75

---

Action brought on 14 November 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-137/12)

2013/C 26/156

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of EPSO not to include the applicant in the list of persons who have passed the tests at the end of the training programme which is part of the certification procedure and a claim for damages.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the action admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the action admissible and well-founded;

| — | annul the contested measure; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested measure;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 10 000 as compensation for the damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 10 000 as compensation for the damage suffered;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
No. 96-6004.

#### Spencer *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 48783.

#### Protests 627373-G, etc., of Vincenzo Sabella *&*Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146. The protests were therefore sustained.