alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Paul Bailey, the chief financial officer of the Company, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Iroquois Gas
Transmission System, L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

DATE: August 13, 2004



/S/ PAUL BAILEY
_________________________________________
PAUL BAILEY
VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
No. 50718.

#### Protests 55709-K, etc., of Di Santo & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the cited decisions, the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for the cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent.
---

Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (Credit Facility Agreement)
Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the Company) and Shenzhen Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development Bank (the
Creditor) Dated January 20, 2011

Main articles:

- Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Zongzi 20110120001;
- Maximum amount of credit facilities to be provided: RMB 200 million;
- Term: from January 26, 2011 to January 18, 2012.
- Purpose of the loan is to provide working capital for the Company;
- Remedies in the event of breach of contract include adjustment of the credit amount, suspension of credit, imposition of punitive interest and overdue interest, an increase of guarantee deposit and the call back of loan principal and interest before
maturity.

Headlines of the articles omitted

- The procedure on using the comprehensive credit facility
- The declaration and promise of the Company
- Transferring of the credit facility under the maximum amount
- Disputation settlement
- Validity
- Notification

---
**Exhibit 31.1**CertificationsI, Gary Allhusen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, of Caneum, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small businessissuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the smallbusiness issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in thesmall business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during thesmall business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting;5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 20, 2006
# T :

To : U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n From : WilliamE . McCracke n Re : Sun Country Slo t

Exemptio n Docke t

No . FAA-2012-008 9 

### ^^-^^ t I OPERATION S ^5i / Fc8 ! 5 P 3 : l u I L (

I a mwritin g t o suppor

t Su n Countr

y Airlines ' reques t

tha t th e U S DO T authoriz e additiona l landin g an dtakeof

f slot s a t Reaga n Nationa l Airpor

t in Washington , DC . 1 liv e i n Eas t Lansing , Michigan , an dm

y daughter , her

husban dandthre e youn g childre n liv e i n Arlington , Virginia . Th e tri p wit

h th e thre e childre n (age s 1 , 4 an d6 ) i s s o muc h easie r o n adirec t

fligh t tha n atwo le g flight-throug h Detroit . 1 a msure tha

t man y others-i n thi s are afee l the-sam e way

^ - .

— I n additio n to tha

t personal reason , I believ e i t make s sens e fo

r direc t flight s t o b e availabl e betwee n th e Lansing , Michigan , Are aan dth e Nation' s Capital . Th e Lansin g Are ahouse s th e Michigan Stat e Government , Michigan Stat e University , major Automobil e Industr

y facilities , an dmany othe r

stat e association s an dbusines s wit h tie s to Washington , DC . W e nee dthi s transportatio n link

fo r al l o f thos e officials , an di

t wil l hel p in Lansing' s economi c developmen t efforts . Ou r famil y ha s use dth e direc t flight s provide dby Sun Countr y Airline s on multipl e occasion s durin g th e pas t

year . Su n Country' s servic e i s excellent . I don' t believ e thi s shoul dpresen t any safet y issues , sinc e Su

n Country ha s ahistory o f saf e servic e t o th e Lansin g Area . Pleas e allo w i t t o continu e flyin g th e direc t rout e betwee n Lansin g an dWashington . I hav e als o include dsignature s i n suppor t o f thi s reques t

fi"o mm y wif e an dseveral o f

ou r friend s an dneighbors , below . Than k yo u fo r you r consideratio n o f

ou r request .



## r^f^hyv5 \
----

----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Thomas W. Maher                                               |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |   |
| Thomas      W. MaherChief      Financial OfficerNovember      19, 2008 |   |   |   |

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry J. Boucher,Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

Theforegoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject toliability under this section.  Thiscertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to theextent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly incorporated by reference in anysuch filing.
| Dated:  August 16, 2007 |   | /s/ Henry J. Boucher, Jr. |   |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Henry J. Boucher, Jr.     |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60469

Conference Calendar

 

BABUBHAI AMARATLAL TAILOR; VARSHABEN TAILOR;

DHARUL BABUBHAI TAILOR,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

A 70 801 601

A 70 801 602

A 70 801 600

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Babubhai Tailor, Varshaben Tailor, and Dharul Babubhai

Tailor petition this court to review the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying their applications for asylum and

withholding of deportation. The Tailors contend that the BIA

erred in rejecting Mr. Tailor’s testimony as not credible, and

they argue that Mr. Tailor’s testimony established a well-founded
No. 96-60469

- 2 -

fear of persecution based upon his membership in the Hindu

Liberal Party. We have reviewed the record, the BIA’s decision,

and the briefs and determine that the evidence does not compel

reversal of the BIA’s determination. Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78

(5th Cir. 1994). 

 PETITION DENIED.
Opinion issued January 27, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00793-CV

———————————

DANITA MANNING, Appellant

V.

LLOYD ERNEST MITCHELL, SR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2012-46494

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Danita Manning, has neither paid the required fees nor 

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; 

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 
2

101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme 

Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on 

Multi-district Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, 

appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the 

clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal 

was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

5, 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Lloyd.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO
              18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350
              AS
      ADDED BY
              SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Peoples Financial Services
Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Debra E. Dissinger,
Executive Vice President, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. To my
knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





By/s/
            Debra
      E. Dissinger
              Executive
      Vice President
              Principal
      Financial Officer





Date:
March 16, 2009
# C_2015146EN.01003601.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2015 — RFA International v Commission

(Case T-466/12) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of ferro-silicon originating in Russia - Refusal of applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid - Calculation of the export price - Single economic entity - Calculation of the dumping margin - Application of a methodology different from that used in the original investigation - Change in circumstances - Article 2(9) and Article 11(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009))

(2015/C 146/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: RFA International, LP (Calgary, Canada) (represented by: B. Evtimov, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Decisions C(2012) 5577 final, C(2012) 5585 final, C(2012) 5588 final, C(2012) 5595 final, C(2012) 5596 final, C(2012) 5598 final and C(2012) 5611 final of 10 August 2012 concerning applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties paid on imports of ferro-silicon originating in Russia, in so far as those decisions refuse reimbursement of the amounts of anti-dumping duties applied for, save for those amounts the applications for which have been found inadmissible because submitted after the statutory time-limits had expired.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders RFA International, LP to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders RFA International, LP to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 389, 15.12.2012.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27541-27542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9423]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RIN 0648-XA17]


Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

[[Page 27542]]

Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that an incidental take permit 
has been issued to the Grants Pass Irrigation District for the 
continued operation and maintenance of Savage Rapids Dam at Grants 
Pass, Oregon, and that the decision documents are available upon 
request.

DATES: Permit 1607 was issued on May 7, 2007, subject to certain 
conditions set forth therein, and took effect on May 7, 2007. The 
permit expires on November 1, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the decision documents or any of the 
other associated documents should be directed to the Habitat 
Conservation Division, NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service, 2900 
NW Stewart Parkway, Roseburg, OR 97470. The documents are also 
available on the Internet at www.nwr.noaa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Phippen, at phone number: (541) 
957-3385, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d7bcb2b9f9a7bfbea7a7b2b997b9b8b6b6f9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1378767d3d637b7a6363767d537d7c72723d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is relevant to the following 
species:
    Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): threatened Southern Oregon and 
Northern California Coasts evolutionarily significant unit.

    Dated: May 10, 2007.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-9423 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2015198EN.01004801.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/48

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2015 — Todorova Androva v Council

(Case F-78/12) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Promotion - 2011 promotion year - Not included in the list of officials eligible for promotion - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Two years’ seniority in the grade - Failure to take account of the period of work carried out as a member of the temporary staff - Difference in treatment due to the legal nature of the employment of the workers concerned - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 4 - Reliance - Exclusion))

(2015/C 198/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Viara Todorova Androva (Rhode-Saint-Genese, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Herrmann and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the Council's decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials eligible for promotion in respect of 2011.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Todorova Androva to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Todorova Androva to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and the European Court of Auditors to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and the European Court of Auditors to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012, p. 34.

1

---
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-15-0002

SAT Date: 10/15/2014

Print Date: 2/3/2015

Related cases: CBI: 

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG; IRR-E,MM,L; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-15-0001-06

FATE: with 1.94% < 500 and 11.12% < 1000

P-15-0001: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

P-15-0002-06: Solid

S = Disp.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk
Sorption to soils/sediments = strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed through the skin; absorption of low 

molecular weight fractions (2 - 3% <500, 11 - 12% <1000) is expected to be poor from the GI 

tract and moderate from the lung (analog). Concern for surfactant effects on the lung; irritation 

to eye, mucous membranes and lung based on surfactant properties of the compounds.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 2.8

daphnid 48-h LC50 2.8

green algal 96-h EC50 0.72

fish _ chronic value 0.43

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.43

algal _ chronic 

value

0.18

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR 

chemical class = with 11.1% < 1000 and 

1.9% < 500; S = 0.12 mg/L @ 20 C (P); liquid with unknown mp (P); pH7; effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; 

hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

18

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916