alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 3.1**

**ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT**

**OF EARTHFIRST TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED**

THE UNDERSIGNED, Chairman and President of EarthFirst Technologies, Incorporated, a Florida corporation, do hereby execute these Articles of Amendment ofthe Articles of Incorporation of EarthFirst Technologies, Incorporated (the “Corporation”), which are hereby amended as follows: 

1. Paragraph one of Article III of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended to delete the existing paragraph one of Article III, and to replace said deleted paragraph one of Article III with the following, whichshall read as follows: 

ARTICLE III 

This corporation is authorized to issue 750,000,000 (seven-hundred fifty million) shares of Common Stock having a par value of $0.0001 per share, which shares will be and hereby are designated as “CommonShares.” Without action by the shareholders, any or all of the authorized shares may be issued by the Corporation from time to time for such consideration as may be fixed by the Board of Directors of this Corporation. 

2. The above-described Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation have been approved by unanimous written consent of all of themembers of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and by written consent a Shareholders holding a majority of the outstanding Common Shares of the Corporation, which amount is sufficient for approval of the Amendment. The written consentsdescribed in this paragraph were executed as of May 24, 2005. 

3. This Amendment to the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation iseffective as of June 16, 2005. 

4. The remainder of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation shall remain in full force andeffect as currently executed and filed. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, the Chairman and President of the Corporation, have executedthese Articles of Amendment this 16th day of June, 2005. 

 

/s/ John Stanton

John Stanton

Chairman

 

/s/ Leon H. Toups

Leon H. Toups

President

STATE OF FLORIDA 

COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH 

Before me, the undersigned notary, personally appeared Leon H. Toups, an individual well known to me, as President of EarthFirst Technologies, Incorporated, and he acknowledged before me that he executed the foregoing Articles of Amendmentof the Articles of Incorporation of EarthFirst Technologies, Incorporated for the purposes therein stated, and he did take an oath this 16th day of June, 2005. 

 

/s/ Joan M. Harrison

Notary Public/DD361293

My Commission Expires: Oct 29, 2006

 

2 

STATE OF FLORIDA 

COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH 

Before me, the undersigned notary, personally appeared John Stanton, an individual well known to me, as Chairman of EarthFirst Technologies, Incorporated, and he acknowledged before me that he executed the foregoing Articles of Amendment ofthe Articles of Incorporation of EarthFirst Technologies, Incorporated for the purposes therein stated, and he did take an oath this 16th day of June, 2005. 

 
/s/ Joan M. Harrison
Notary Public DD361293

 

My Commission Expires: October 29, 2006

 

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 110A17

Filed 22 December 2017

STEVEN HARRIS,

Petitioner

v.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Respondent

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of 

the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 798 S.E.2d 127 (2017), affirming a final 

decision dated 25 January 2016 issued by Administrative Law Judge Donald W. 

Overby in the Office of Administrative Hearings. Heard in the Supreme Court on 13 

December 2017.

Law Offices of Michael C. Byrne, by Michael C. Byrne, for petitioner-appellee. 

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Tamika L. Henderson, Assistant 

Attorney General, and Ryan Park, Deputy Solicitor General, for respondentappellant.

Essex Richards, P.A., by Norris A. Adams, II, for North Carolina Fraternal 

Order of Police, and Blanchard, Miller, Lewis & Isley, P.A., by E. Hardy Lewis, 

for North Carolina State Employees Association, amici curiae.

The McGuinness Law Firm, by J. Michael McGuinness, and Milliken Law, by 

Megan A. Milliken, for North Carolina Police Benevolent Association and 

Southern States Police Benevolent Association, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
CARSUNLIMITED.COM, INC


EXHIBIT 99(a)

     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carsunlimited.com, Inc (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB of the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Daniel Myers,
President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the quarterly
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the quarterly report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Date:   August 16, 2004



/s/ Daniel Myers
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman of the Board and Director
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### In re Marshall FIELD, Jr., Debtor. Jeffrey B. GIVENS, Plaintiff, v. Marshall FIELD, Jr., Defendant.

Bankruptcy No. 97-05498.

Adversary No. 97-80246.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina.

June 1, 1998.

*177Judson K. Chapin, III, Gaines, Walsh & Chapin, Spartanburg, SC, for Plaintiff.

James H. Cassidy, Love, Thornton, Arnold & Thomason, P.A., Greenville, SC, for Defendant.

*ORDER*

WM. THURMOND BISHOP, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the court is plaintiffs motion for summary judgment regarding a pending adversary action to have a West Virginia judgment, now indexed in South Carolina, declared non-dischargeable.

This motion was heard on February 4, 1998, and is based solely on the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel to foreclose relitigation of issues in this adversary which have actually been litigated in this earlier West Virginia action.

Principles of collateral estoppel or issue preclusion apply in dischargeability proceedings in bankruptcy and federal courts must as a matter of full faith and credit apply the forum state’s law of collateral estoppel when the courts of the state from which the judgment emerged would do so.- *Grogan v. Garner,*498 U.S. 279, 284, 111 S.Ct. 654, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991); *Todd v. Societe BIC,*9 F.3d 1216 (7th Cir.1993).

The threshold question regarding this motion is whether in West Virginia a default judgment can be the foundation for the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel. The judgment at issue here originated in West Virginia and is a default judgment resulting from discovery abuses.

This court is of the belief that plaintiffs analysis of *Christian v. Sizemore,*185 W.Va. 409, 407 S.E.2d 715 (1991) is misplaced as this case indicates that West Virginia is one of those states which still applies the principle of collateral estoppel as set forth in the Restatement of Judgments which is that default judgments have no collateral estoppel effect. *Restatement (Second) of Judgments*§ 27(e) 1982.

The plaintiff reads West Virginia law to afford collateral estoppel when an individual had the prior opportunity to litigate his or her claim and the defendant had this opportunity in this case. However, the plain*178tiff is only partially correct. Under West Virginia law, the requirement for collateral estoppel is three fold: there must be a judgment rendered on the merits; there must be an issue which has been actually litigated; there must be a scenario in which the entity against whom collateral estoppel is asserted has had a prior opportunity to have its claim litigated. These requirements are conjunctive not disjunctive.

The plaintiff fails to show that this action was actually litigated. The law in West Virginia is as set forth in *Christian*and holds that default judgments cannot be afforded collateral estoppel because these judgments have not been actually litigated. 407 S.E.2d 715. Collateral estoppel is not applicable in the case before this court.

Now, therefore, it is

ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied.
Before the First Division,

November 30, 1950

No. 54895.

#### The Maltbie Chemical Co. *v.*United States,

protest 160767-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of sheep gall the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
# C_2016059EN.01001301.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2015 — SNCF v Commission

(Case T-242/12) (1)

1

((State aid - Aid measures implemented by France in favour of Sernam SCS - Aid measures for restructuring and recapitalising, guarantees and debt write-off by SNCF in favour of Sernam - Decision declaring the aid measures incompatible with the internal market - Misuse of aid - Recovery - Economic continuity - Private investor criterion))

(2016/C 059/12)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Beurier, O. Billard and V. Landes, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: French Republic (represented by: initially D. Colas and J. Gstalter, subsequently by D. Colas and J. Rossi and finally by D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Mory SA, in liquidation, (Pantin, France) and Mory Team, in liquidation, (Pantin) (represented by: B. Vatier and F. Loubières, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2012/398/EU of 9 March 2012 on State aid SA. 12522 (C 37/08) — France — Enforcing the Sernam 2 Decision (OJ 2012 L 195, p. 19).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application of the Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application of the Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF);

| 2. | Orders SNCF to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SNCF to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs;

| 4. | Orders Mory and Mory Team to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Mory and Mory Team to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 10.2

                                                                         Summary
                                                                         -------


Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount Entered Between BAK HK and Agricultural Bank
on May 20th, 2005

Main contents
>>   Contract number: (Shenzhen Longgang) Nongyin Gaobaozi 81905200500000068';
>>   As guarantor, BAK HK undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for
     the Company's  indebtedness  towards  Agricultural Bank under Comprehensive
     Agreement  2 from May  20th,  2005 to May  20th,  2006 and  maximum  amount
     secured is RMB200 million.
>>   Secured  items  include the loan  principal,  interest,  penalty  interest,
     breach  of  contract   compensation  and  all  the  expenses  incurred  for
     Agricultural  Bank to realize  its  creditor's  right  under  Comprehensive
     Agreement 2;
>>   Guaranty period:
     |X|  Two years from the expiry  date that the  Company  should  fulfill its
          obligations in accordance with Comprehensive Agreement 2;
     |X|  For  discounted  commercial  drafts,  the term is two  years  from the
          expiry date of the discounted commercial drafts;
     |X|  If term of  Comprehensive  Agreement 2 is  extended,  guaranty  period
          shall be two years from the expiry date for the Company to fulfill its
          obligations according to the extended agreement;
     |X|  If due to the  provisions  of relevant PRC law or  regulations  or any
          agreement  reached under  Comprehensive  Agreement 2, any loan becomes
          mature ahead of its term,  guaranty period shall be two years starting
          from the advance mature date.

Terms that have been  omitted:  indebtedness  to be secured and maximum  amount;
commitment  of the  guarantor;  liability;  dispute  settlement;  miscellaneous;
effectiveness; validity; and attention.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended  Quarterly Report of Infinity Capital Group, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,
Theodore A. Greenberg,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief Investment  Officer and
Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: September 21, 2006


Name: Theodore A. Greenberg

/s/Theodore A. Greenberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Secretary


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit
      23.1**














**Windes
      & McClaughry Accountancy Corporation**







**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of Seychelle Environmental
      Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-KSB of our report dated April 12, 2006, on the
      audited financial statements of Seychelle Environmental Technologies Inc.,
      as of
      February 28, 2006 and for the year then ended.





Irvine,
      California


**June
      12, 2006**





18201
      Von
      Karman Ave. Suite 1060, Irvine, CA 92612


Tele:
      (949) 271-2600        Fax:
      (949) 660-5681
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         125,037                       0
<SECURITIES>                                12,953,674                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,078,711                       0
<PP&E>                                      38,752,765                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,513,905                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,954,986                       0
<BONDS>                                    109,720,908                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,567,652                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    12,251,250                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,980,891)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,513,905                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,809,117                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,848,508                 177,935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,039,391)               (177,935)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,170,836)               (177,935)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: June 16, 2008



| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Donald B. Cohen                       
| | Donald B. Cohen                           
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
Searched for **https://letgirlslearn.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://letgirlslearn.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jerry L. Dauderman certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Windsor Woodmont
     Black Hawk Resort Corp.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2003


/s/ Jerry L. Dauderman
----------------------
Jerry L. Dauderman, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer