alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
        32
 
 CERTIFICATION
 OF
 CHIEF
        EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
 CHIEF
        FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
        Michael Chou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
        on Form
        10-QSB of C&D Production Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
        on
        Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.
 
 I,
        Chien-Te Chou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
        on Form
        10-QSB of C&D Production Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
        on
        Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.
 
 Pursuant
        to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
        certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.
  By:
                /s/ Michael
                  ChouMichael Chou
                  Chairman
                      of the Board, Chief Executive
                    Officer
                      and Secretary
  By:
                /s/ Chien-Te
                  ChouChien-Te Chou
                  Chief
                        Financial Officer and
                      Administrative
                        and Financial Manager
  January
          27, 2006
No. 74-5822.

#### Hampton, aka Byers *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and certiorari granted.
EXHIBIT 99.2
------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Len Ksobiech state and attest that:

     (1)  I am  the  acting  Treasurer  of  OneSource  Technologies,  Inc.  (the
"issuer").

     (2)  Accompanying  this  certification  is the Form  10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003, a quarterly  report (the  "quarterly  report") filed by the
issuer with the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  pursuant to Section  13(a) or
15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  (the  "Exchange  Act"),  which
contains financial statements.

     (3) I hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 that  based on my
knowledge:

          a. the quarterly  report  containing  the financial  statements  fully
     complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
     Act, and

          b. the information  contained in the periodic report fairly  presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the issuer for the periods presented therein.


/s/ Len Ksobiech
------------------------------
Len Ksobiech, Acting Treasurer

Date: 13 August 2003
# C_2013233EN.01000801.xml

| 10.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/8

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 July 2013 — GRE v OHIM — Villiger Söhne (LIBERTE american blend against a red background)

(Case T-206/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark LIBERTE american blend - Earlier Community word mark La LIBERTAD - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 233/13

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (Kloster Lehnin, Germany) (represented by: I. Memmler and S. Schulz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Villiger Söhne GmbH (Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) (represented by: B. Pikolin and H. McKenzie, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 March 2012 (Case R 411/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Villiger Söhne GmbH and GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Finance’s Van Sickler presented with commanders coin

By Brianne M. BenderDLA Distribution Command Affairs

                NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa.  –              
DLA Finance Business Analyst, Michelle Van Sickler received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution commanding officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 1.

Upon announcement of a DLA Office of Inspector General’s inspection of Distribution’s Small Arms Major End Item Rates, Van Sickler put forth great efforts to provide the Office of Inspector General with extensive information on Army small arms workload, budgeting and rate setting as far back as fiscal year 2015.  

Van Sickler walked the OIG through the program budget review process, explaining the intricacies in developing a budget submission as diverse as DLA Distribution’s requirements.  Her ongoing efforts have informed the OIG of every data point requested.  

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alex Stelmak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
19th day of June 2003.


/s/ Alex Stelmak
------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001057234
<NAME> UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                       227
<INVENTORY>                                      8,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,195
<PP&E>                                         368,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 469,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,986
<BONDS>                                        363,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         13
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   469,942
<SALES>                                         38,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,449
<CGS>                                           31,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                77,130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,994)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,982)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,982)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Henry J. Boucher, Jr., President, ChiefExecutive Officer of IWT Tesoro Corporation, certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of IWT Tesoro Corporationfor the quarter ended June 30 , 2004;

 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and proceduresto ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior tothe filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and

 

6.       Ihave indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 

 
| Date:  August 13, 2004 | By:                                    | /s/ Henry J.  Boucher, Jr. |   |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                   | Henry  J. Boucher, Jr.,                |
|                   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-61774 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-37648,
333-55260, 333-67784, 333-69504, and 333-99473 on Form S-8 of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. of our report dated
May 23, 2003 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2003.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
May 23, 2003

---

QuickLinks
No. 74-946.

#### Duplan Corp. et al. *v.*Moulinage et Retorderie de Chavanoz.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.
#### Brett David SPEER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-4196.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 5, 1999.

Brett David Speer, Cross City, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn As-*455bury, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Brett David Speer appeals a trial court order which denied his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he challenged his sentence following a guilty plea. The plea was in exchange for a guidelines sentence and the state’s nolle pros of certain counts against appellant.

Appellant alleged in his rule 3.800(a) motion that 21.8 points were added to his sentencing guidelines score sheet relating to the counts which were to be nolle prosed. As a result, appellant alleged that his score sheet erroneously provided a higher guidelines range than it should have.

If appellant pled to a specific term of years, without any condition that it be within the sentencing guidelines, then he would have waived this claim and it would not have qualified for rule 3.800(a) relief. *See Perry v. State,*705 So.2d 615 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); *Skidmore v. State,*688 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). However, if he pled guilty on the condition that he would receive a guidelines sentence, and that sentence was the product of miscalculations, then he would be entitled to relief. *See Corp v. State,*698 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We cannot make this determination, because the trial court order denying appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion failed to attach the pertinent information upon which it relied to deny the motion. This precludes meaningful review by this court. *See Thomas v. State,*707 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); *Corp v. State,*698 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); *Thomas v. State,*667 So.2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand either for attachment of those portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief, or for further proceedings pursuant to this decision.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GUNTHER, POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
# C_2012109EN.01003001.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/30

---

Action brought on 16 February 2012 — Wahl v OHIM — Tenacta Group (bellissima)

(Case T-77/12)

2012/C 109/60

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wahl GmbH (Unterkirnach, Germany) (represented by: T. Kieser, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tenacta Group SpA (Azzano S. Paolo, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Alter the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 21 November 2011 so as to reject Opposition No B1560781 of 2 November 2009 to Community trade mark No 004534889; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 21 November 2011 so as to reject Opposition No B1560781 of 2 November 2009 to Community trade mark No 004534889;

| — | in the alternative, alter the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 21 November 2011 so as to reject Opposition No B1560781 of 2 November 2009 to Community trade mark No 004534889 in relation to registration of the trade mark applied for in respect of goods in Class 7; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, alter the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 21 November 2011 so as to reject Opposition No B1560781 of 2 November 2009 to Community trade mark No 004534889 in relation to registration of the trade mark applied for in respect of goods in Class 7;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Wahl GmbH.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘bellissima’ for goods in Classes 7 and 8 (application No 8406704).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Tenacta Group SpA.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark ‘bellissima IMETEC’ for goods in Classes 9 and 11 (Community trade mark No 4534889).

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition allowed.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, as there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the
Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Amici Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on the Form 10-KSB for the
period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, James S. Cardwell, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report filed by the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein. Date: January 28, 2005
    
    AMICI VENTURES,
      INC.
      By:  /s/ James S. Cardwell
              
              James S. Cardwell
              Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 31