UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C. 20549




FORM 10-KSB










(
X ) ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934





For the
fiscal year ended February 29, 2008





(
) TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934





For the
transition period from _______________ to __________________




Commission File No.
0-29373




logo


Seychelle Environmental
Technologies, Inc.


(Exact
Name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Nevada
            33-0836954(State
      or other jurisdiction
            (IRS
      Employer File Number)Of
      incorporation)33012
      Calle PerfectoSan Juan Capistrano,
      California
            92675(Address
      of principal executive offices)
            (zip
      code)




(949)
234-1999


(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)





Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None





Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:





Common
Stock, $0.001 per share par value





Check
whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes: [ ] No:  [X]





Check if
there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B is contained in this form and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB. [
]





Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) : Yes [ ] No [X]





State
issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year were $858,769.  The
aggregate market value of the voting stock of the Registrant held by
non-affiliates as of February 29, 2008 was approximately $5,800,000
..  The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's common stock,
as of the latest practicable date, February 29, 2008, was
25,613,670.





References
in this document to "us," "we," “Seychelle,” “SYEV,” or "the Company" refer to
Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc., its predecessor and its
subsidiary.
















TABLE OF
CONTENTS




Item
              Description
              PagePart
      IItem 1.
              Description
      of the Business
              3Risk
      Factors Related to Our Business
              7Item 2.
              Description
      of Property
              11Item 3.
              Legal
      Proceedings
              10Item 4.
              Submission
      of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
              10Part
      IIItem 5.
              Market
      for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
              10Item 6.
              Management's
      Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
              11Item 7.
              Financial
      Statements
              19Item 8.
              Changes
      in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
      Disclosure
              43Item8A.
              Controls
      and Procedures
              43Item 8B.
              Other
      Information
              44Part
      IIIItem 9.
              Directors
      and Executive Officers of the Registrant
              44Item
      9b
              Other
      Information
              46Item 10.
              Executive
      Compensation
              46Item 11.
              Security
      Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
      Shareholder Matters
              49Item 12.
              Certain
      Relationships and Related Transactions
              50Part
      IVItem 13.
              Exhibits
              51Item 14.
              Principal
      Accountant Fees and Services
              52Signatures
              54





-
2 -







PART
I





ITEM
1.    Description of the
Business.




(a)  
Business History of
Seychelle





We are a
Nevada corporation. Our principal business address is 33012 Calle Perfecto, San
Juan Capistrano, California 92675. Our telephone number at this address is
949-234-1999.





We were
incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 23, 1998 as a
change of domicile to Royal Net, Inc., a Utah corporation that was originally
incorporated on January 24, 1986. Royal Net, Inc. changed its state of domicile
to Nevada and its name to Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc. effective
in January 1998.





On
January 30, 1998, we entered into an Exchange Agreement with Seychelle Water
Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (SWT), whereby we exchanged our issued
and outstanding capital shares with the shareholders of SWT on a one share for
one share basis. We became the parent company and SWT became a wholly owned
subsidiary. SWT had been formed in 1997 to market water filtration systems of
Aqua Vision International.





Organization





Our
Company is presently comprised of Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc., a
Nevada corporation, with one wholly-owned subsidiary, Seychelle Water
Technologies, Inc., also a Nevada corporation (collectively, the Company or
Seychelle). We use the trade name "Seychelle Water Filtration Products, Inc." in
our commercial operations.




(b)
Business of Seychelle




General





Seychelle
designs and manufactures unique, state-of-the-art ionic adsorption micron
filters that remove up to 99.99% of all pollutants and contaminants found in any
fresh water source. Patents or trade secrets cover all proprietary products.
Since human bodies are approximately 75% water, our mission is twofold: First,
to help educate everyone to the fact that the quality of water they drink is
important and second, to make available low-cost, effective filtration products
that will meet the need for safe, great tasting, high quality drinking
water.





As of
February 29, 2008, Seychelle has sold over 2 million portable water filtration
bottles throughout the world to customers such as individuals, dealers,
distributors and to governments, military, agencies and emergency relief
organizations such as the U.S. Marine Corps, the International Red Cross,
Eco-Challenge, Kenya Wild Life Service, La Cruz Roja de Mexico and the N.Y.
Institute for the Blind. In addition, the Company has donated thousands of
portable bottles to church groups and missionaries worldwide.





In 2001,
the World Bank placed the value of the world water market at close to $400
billion annually. Bottled water, according to Water Facts, has emerged as the
second largest commercial beverage category by volume in the U.S. However,
Seychelle products compete in a more limited market: the portable
filtration product segment.  Enviroscrub Technology estimated the U.S.
household water filtration market, in March 2004 to be $500 million in size,
growing at 10 percent annually. Additional information pertaining to the size of
the portable water filtration market is not reasonably known to us.





In
developing countries, many people in rural areas boil their water for drinking
and cooking to kill bacteria, but this process does not remove the pyrogens,
chemicals, toxins, volatile organisms, heavy metals and other pathogens that
remain in the water. In Africa alone, according to Earth Prayers From Around the
World, approximately 6,000 people die every day because of water borne
diseases.





Business
Plan




The
management of Seychelle represents over 100 years of combined experience in
developing improvements and innovations in the field of bottled water, reverse
osmosis, ultra filtration and filter technology. As a result, our products can
deliver up to .2-micron filtration, at pennies per gallon, with pressure as low
as 5 pounds per square inch (PSI). Further, our point of difference filtration
systems remove up to 99.99% of all known pollutants and contaminants most
commonalty found in fresh drinking water supplies in the four major areas of
concern as follows:





-
3 -








AESTHETICS:
Taste, chlorine, sand, sediment and odor problems.


BIOLOGICS:
Pathogens such as Cryptosporidium, Giardia and E. coli bacteria.


CHEMICALS:
Pesticides, detergents, toxic chemicals and industrial waste.


DISSOLVED
SOLIDS: Heavy metals such as aluminum, asbestos, copper, lead, mercury and
radon-222.





Seychelle
filters have been tested by independent and government laboratories throughout
the world and are approved for sale and distribution in the following countries:
United States, Mexico, United Kingdom, Korea, Malaysia, Japan, The Peoples
Republic of China, Vietnam, New Zealand, Australia, Brazil, Venezuela,
Argentina, South Africa, and Pakistan. In the United States, Seychelle filters
have been certified by California and Florida approved independent laboratories
implementing Environmental Protection Agency, American National Standards
Institute, and National Sanitation Foundation protocol, procedures, standards
and methodology. Additionally, we offer a test pack for potential customers that
include the test results from selected countries. In addition, results from the
United States, United Kingdom and South Africa are displayed on our Website:
www.seychelle.com. To our knowledge, no other water filtration system can
achieve this level of removal of up to 99.99% of all known pollutants and
contaminants most commonly found in fresh drinking water supplies in the four
major areas of concern. The benefit of such filtration can save lives worldwide
as awareness of Seychelle’s product line increases and is used.




Principal
Products or Services and their Markets





Current
Products





Seychelle
has a varied line of portable filters for people on the go. They include Flip
Top’s and varied military style canteens - regular or with advanced filters (for
further bacteria control). Sizes are from 18 ounce to 30 ounce, and provide up
to 100 gallons of pure drinking water from any fresh water source, running or
stagnant (such as rivers, lakes, ponds, streams and puddles).





The
current portable products include: Flip-Top bottle, Canteen, Pure Water Pump,
Bottoms-Up bottles, Emergency bottle, In-Line filter, Pure Water Bag, Pump N’
Pure, Pure Water Straw, Emergency Survival Pack, Water Pitcher and Replacement
Filters.





New
Products





We have
re-engineered the Flip Top bottle to eliminate parts, reduce costs, provide a
more streamlined look, and add a disinfectant capability. Additionally, the
In-Line Filter is being changed to provide greater filter media, and meet field
conditions that require a longer, narrower design.  The new Emergency
Survival Pack meets the essential needs, including food, for one person to
survive for three days during any kind of a disaster.





We signed
an exclusive license agreement with Gary Hess (the License Agreement), doing
business as Aqua Gear USA on June 6, 2002 for a product known as the "Hand Held
Pump Technology." We licensed all proprietary rights associated with this
technology. We pay a 2% royalty on our gross sales for the technology during the
term of the License Agreement. The License Agreement was for an initial term of
five years and was renewed with four successive five-year renewals remaining.
This offers us an additional proprietary product in the portable filtration
industry. We believe that this License Agreement compliments our current product
line. As of the date of this document, this technology, which was completed in
2005, has resulted in a product called Pump N’ Pure which allows the user to
draw filtered water from virtually any container or location. The Company
continues to believe that the product will be viable in developing countries, as
an emergency preparedness product, and for families where cost is a prime
consideration. The Company commenced marketing the Hand Held Pump as part of its
Aqua Gear product line in the U.S. sporting goods industry in fiscal
2008.





During
July 2006, the Company signed a second exclusive license agreement (the Second
Agreement) with Gary Hess, doing business as Aqua Gear USA. We will pay a 2%
royalty on net sales for this technology up to $120,000 and 1%
thereafter.  This agreement included the issuing of 100,000 warrants
to Gary Hess that is being amortized over three years.  The Second
Agreement shall continue indefinitely unless terminated due to a default or
breach of the agreement. This affords the Company additional patent protection
(patent # 6,136,188) and ownership of the trademark Aqua Gear. Products affected
include all Aqua Gear trademarked filter bottles sold in the product
line.  As of the date of this document, approximately $18,300 in
royalties has been paid under these license agreements.





During
April 2006, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to the shareholders
of Continental Technologies, Inc. (Continental) with an approximate value of
$16,100 for the Redi Chlor brand name, trademark and the use of the EPA
Registration Number 55304-4-7126. As of the date of this document, the Company
has commenced selling the Redi Chlor brand name water chlorine tablets to
consumers, dealers, distributors and manufacturers. Each tablet disinfects five
gallons of source water. Under the agreement, the Company further agreed to
remit to Continental a 10% commission on net sales, as defined, of the existing
product and 10% on any product sold by Continental for us to their existing or
new customers at our original equipment manufacturer (OEM) prices. The agreement
is through the life of Seychelle. Through February 29, 2008, $2,683 has been
paid in royalties.





During
July 2007, the Company received approval from the U.S Food and Drug
Administration to import certain of the Company’s emergency preparedness
products. As of the date of this document, the Company has sold approximately
721 units to its customers.





-
4 -





Manufacturing





The
Company has determined that we will be able to produce some of our product
components in China at a lower cost than in the U.S. while maintaining
equivalent quality standards. Our proprietary filter will continue to be
manufactured in the U.S. The final assembly of our products is completed at our
facility in San Juan Capistrano, California.





On
September 1, 2005, we signed an exclusive agreement with Huanghua Seychelle
Plastic Co., Ltd to manufacture component parts.





Sales Channels





Sales
channels to be pursued will include: Retail, Military, Government,
Non-Governmental Agencies (NGO)’s, Foundations, Missionaries, Multi-Level
Marketing, International, OEM and Joint Ventures. At present, we are talking to
five multi-level marketing companies with over one million distributors
worldwide who currently do not have a water product in their line. Seychelle,
with over sixty years of combined multi-level and direct sales marketing
experience is well positioned to help any of these companies make a meaningful
impact within their sales organizations.


.


Several
other distributors continue to represent the Company’s portable water filtration
products to customers in specific distribution channels; including: retail,
multi-national corporations, foundations, sports, governmental agencies, and the
military (both US and International). We have one large foundation that is
currently lab testing our filter’s performance. They have shown great interest
and feel that our product meets their foundation’s needs for providing safe
drinking water to the humanitarian channels they serve.





Another
water filter marketing company has contacted us to private label products for
them. They have many contacts within the retail and governmental channels and we
are in discussions with them on a distribution rights agreement.





Further,
we have sold some varied products to a large distributor who, among other
things, sells aggressively in over 200 consumer shows annually with a large
sales organization. They are expert in event sales, and feel that our water
bottles would be ideal for them and we are in discussions concerning a private
label.





Raw
Materials





Seychelle’s
filters include the finest powdered water-activated coconut and three other
media as components in the porous plastic ionic filter. The media itself, the
formulation process, and manufacturing methodology are governed by trade
secrets. To date, there is an adequate availability of material for all of our
products. We do not expect this situation to change in the near
future.




Customers
and Competition





Seychelle
products compete against all forms of drinking water: tap water supplied by
municipal water districts, bottled water, and home water treatment systems
provided by suppliers (such as independent dealers, distributors, catalogs,
Internet sellers, etc.) in the form of reverse osmosis systems, distillation,
and filtration systems.  Therefore, Seychelle’s portable and home
filtration products compete in a limited segment of the market as an alternative
to other sources of drinking water.





Seychelle
is an emerging company with negligible share of the world’s pure water market.
Our products sell in a niche category of the market - portable filtration
bottles that use ionic adsorption micron filtration technology, which remove
many organic and inorganic contaminants that simple activated carbon filters
cannot. Most activated carbon filters on the market remove Chlorine, sediment
and dirt thus improving taste and odor, as well as a handful of other
contaminants such as Lead, Mercury, Zinc and Copper. This would include leading
brands such as Brita, PUR, General Electric and Culligan, who collectively
dominate the market. In the portable segment of the market, there are hundreds
of small companies selling a variety of specialized filters with no one company
having a majority share and no industry data available. We believe that our
current share of this market is negligible.





Seychelle
sells its products in two ways. First, it sells its own brand to individuals,
dealers, distributors, multilevel marketing companies and missionaries on a
direct basis, and through our Internet Web Site. Second, the Company offers its
products to the same customers as a private label supplier if purchasers buy in
significant volume. In some instances, we may supply only filters for their
bottles or hydration backpacks as opposed to completed products.





Currently,
the majority of our sales are to customers in the U.S.  However, with
distribution agreements for the Peoples Republic of China, Hong Kong,
Japan, Singapore, Taiwan and India, overseas sales could increase in the future
as these countries have a greater need for safe drinking water. As of
February 29, 2008, two customers (Food For Health, 18% and Wellness Enterprises,
26%) each account for greater than 10% of our total sales.







-
5 -





Backlog





As of
February 29, 2008, Food For Health, Inc. has approximately 21,000 bottles on
back order, with an estimated sales value of approximately
$129,000.  Additionally, as of February 29, 2008, the Company had open
purchase orders from Giles Butler for 3,500 bottles, with an estimated sales
value of $32,700.




Employees





As of
February 29, 2008, we had a President and two (2) executive employees managing
the Company with three (3) administrative employees supporting that
effort.  In production, operations and warehousing we had one (1)
full-time employee and two (2) independent contractors working to fill all sales
orders.




Proprietary
Information and Technology





We own a
patent for the portable water filtration system with the filter cap assembly,
Patent # 5,914,045 that expires on June 22, 2016. As described in the Abstract,
it is "[a] filter assembly for a flexible, portable bottle having a sealing cap
including a filter attached to the interior of the cap to filter out
substantially all inorganics, organics, radiological chemicals and microbiology.
The filter assembly also may include a second filter or iodinator sealed in the
flexible bottle to further remove micro-organisms from water passing
there-through. The filter assembly is designed so that the flexible bottle must
be pressurized, as by being hand pressed, after it is filled with water to force
flow of water through the [sic] either or both of the filters. The filter in the
cap includes a check valve to allow the bottle to be re-pressurized after water
has been dispensed from the bottle." The filter cap assembly is the core to the
Company’s product lines, and will drive sales for many years to come as the
Company adds new products and configurations.





We also
own a patent, Patent #6,058,971 that expires on May 9, 2017 for a quick connect
diverter valve. As described in the Abstract, it is "A quick-connect diverter
valve for use in connecting existing water faucets and water filtration units in
and around a kitchen, or other areas where clean water is desired." The quick
connect diverter value is used in the above the counter filter system currently
being sold in the United States, Pakistan and China. The Company believes this
is a viable and growing product line for developing countries where the quality
of water continues to deteriorate.





As these
patents expire in 8 and 9 years, respectively, the Company cannot at this time
estimate the financial impact of the expiration of these patents.





Trademark
registrations have been filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office
for both Seychelle and Aqua Gear and are in progress.





We have a
trade name, "Seychelle Water Filtration Products, Inc.," which we use in our
commercial operations.





Government
Regulation





We are
not, as a company, subject to any material governmental regulation or approvals.
However, our products are subject to inspection and evaluation by regulatory
authorities that have jurisdiction over water quality standards. Such
authorities are on the federal, state, and local level, both in the United
States and overseas, where we market our products. Most of our products have
already been inspected and evaluated by all applicable governmental authorities
in the areas in which we operate or plan to operate in the near future. With
respect to our current focus of operations, we do not know if governmental
regulation will have a material impact on us in the future.





Research
and Development





We have
spent approximately $1,900 in research and development activities during the
fiscal year ended February 29, 2008.  As of the time of this filing,
virtually all research, development and testing are being performed by Carl
Palmer, the Company’s CEO, as part of his day-to-day
duties.





Environmental
Compliance





At the
present time, Seychelle is not subject to any material costs for compliance with
any environmental laws. With respect to our current focus of operations, we do
not know if environmental compliance will have a material impact on us in the
future.











-
6 -





Risk
Factors Related to Our Business











THE
OWNERSHIP AND INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL RISKS. OUR
COMMON SHARES SHOULD BE PURCHASED ONLY BY PERSONS WHO CAN AFFORD TO LOSE THEIR
ENTIRE INVESTMENT. PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THESE RISKS
RELATING TO OUR COMPANY.





Lack of Successful Operating History.Our Company was formed on January 23, 1998 and acquired the operations of
a company that had been in existence since 1996. Since beginning operations, we
initially sold water filtration products to a number of customers, then during
March 2001 entered into a sales marketing agreement with Nikken Global, Inc. and
Kenko World, two affiliated multi-level marketing companies (collectively
“Nikken”). This agreement allowed Nikken the exclusive rights to distribute our
products and technology for a period of ten years, commencing March 1, 2001.
During the period of the agreement, the Company continued to promote its
products and technologies to non-profit organizations, such as the Red Cross,
the U.S. and international militaries, missionaries, charitable and fund-raising
groups and other philanthropic organizations, which do not sell to distributors
or resell to customers. During the fiscal year ending February 28, 2002, the
Company decided to terminate its agreement with Nikken. The Company has
continued to expand its product lines, since the Nikken business ended, but have
not generated enough revenue to support operations. This has required us to seek
both investor capital and financing to buy the time required by new management
to reverse the downward trend. Recent sales activity for the fiscal year ended
February 29, 2008 has decreased over the past year. Still, we have limited
financial results upon which you may judge our potential. The Company is not
engaged in enough consistent business activity over a sustained period of time
to be said to have a successful operating history. We have experienced in the
past and may experience in the future under-capitalization, shortages, setbacks
and many of the problems, delays and expenses encountered by any early stage
business. These include:





-
            operating
      as a public entity, incurring non-cost of sales expenses such as
      accounting, auditing, financial reporting and compliance, legal and costs
      to maintain full compliance with rules governing regulated reporting
      status, including continuing Sarbanes-Oxley
  requirements,-
            unplanned
      delays and expenses related to research, development and testing of our
      new products-
            production
      and marketing problems that may be encountered in connection with our
      existing products and technologies,-
            competition
      from larger and more established companies, and-
            under-capitalization
      to challenge the lack of market acceptance of our new products and
      technologies.





Lack of Profitability.To
date, we have incurred significant losses.  For the year ended
February 29, 2008, our revenue was $858,769 versus $952,646 for the prior
fiscal year ended February 28, 2007. This decrease was due primarily to sales
with two customers. Net losses for the year ended February 29, 2008 of
$263,462 were smaller than in the prior year ended February 28, 2007 of
$1,464,298 due to a reduction in cost of goods in the fiscal year ended February
29, 2008 and a interest expense decreasing in the prior year compared to the
fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 due to financing costs with TAM Trust, The
Company has a policy of not projecting sales and profits due to:





-                 
lack of consistent sales to maintain profitability.


-                 
significant legal and professional fees associated with regulated business
activities and the SEC,


-                 
reporting requirements, including continuing Sarbanes-Oxley
requirements,





As a
result of our history of operations, it is not possible for us to predict when,
if ever, we may achieve profitability. If we continue to be unprofitable, we may
eventually go out of business. As a result, investors may lose some or all of
their investment.





Inherently Risky-Competition.Because we are a Company with a no history of profitability, our
operations will be extremely competitive and subject to numerous risks. The
water filtration business is highly competitive with many companies having
access to the same market. Substantially all of them have greater financial
resources and longer operating histories than we have and can be expected to
compete within the business in which we engage and intend to engage. There can
be no assurance that we will have the necessary resources to be competitive.
Therefore, investors should consider an investment in us to be an extremely
risky venture.





Delays in the Development of New
Products. We have a limited product line, and the development of some of
our technologies has taken longer than anticipated and could be additionally
delayed. Therefore, there can be no assurance of timely completion and
introduction of improved products on a cost-effective basis, or that such
products, if introduced, will achieve market acceptance such that, in
combination with existing products, they will sustain us or allow us
to achieve profitable operations.





Dependence Upon Technology.We
are operating in a business that requires extensive and continuing research,
development and testing efforts. There can be no assurance that new products
will not render our products obsolete or non-competitive at some time in the
future.








-
7 -





Protection of Technology.A
successful challenge to the ownership of our technology could materially damage
our business prospects. We rely principally on trade secrets as well as trade
secret laws, two patents, two trademarks, copyrights, confidentiality procedures
and licensing arrangements to protect our intellectual property rights. We
currently have two U.S. patents issued and a license on two patents. Any issued
patent may be challenged and invalidated. Patents may not be issued from any of
our future applications. Any claims allowed from existing or future pending
patents may not be of sufficient scope or strength to provide significant
protection for our products. Patents may not be issued in all countries where
our products can be sold so as to provide meaningful protection or any
commercial advantage to us. Our competitors may also be able to design around
our patents or the patents that we license.





Vigorous
protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights or positions characterize
our industry, which has resulted in significant and often protracted and
expensive litigation. Therefore, our competitors may assert that our
technologies or products infringe on their patents or proprietary rights.
Problems with patents or other rights could increase the cost of our products or
delay or preclude new product development and commercialization by us. If
infringement claims against us are deemed valid, we may not be able to obtain
appropriate licenses on acceptable terms or at all. Litigation could be costly
and time-consuming but may be necessary to protect our future patent and/or
technology license positions or to defend against infringement
claims.





Competition.Technological
competition from larger and more established companies is significant and
expected to increase. Most of the companies with which we compete and expect to
compete have far greater capital resources and more significant research and
development staffs, marketing and distribution programs and facilities, and many
of them have substantially greater experience in the production and marketing of
products. Our ability to compete effectively may be adversely affected by the
ability of these competitors to devote greater resources to the sale and
marketing of their products than we can. In addition, one or more of our
competitors may succeed or may already have succeeded in developing technologies
and products that are more effective than any of those we currently offer or are
developing. In addition, there can be no guarantee that we will be able to
protect our technology from being copied or infringed upon. Therefore, there are
no assurances that we will ever be able to obtain and to maintain a profitable
position in the marketplace. However, no company to date has been able to match
our technology or our cost.





Success Dependent Upon
Management.  Our success is dependent upon the decision making of
our directors and executive officers. These individuals have made a full
commitment to the business. The loss of any or all of these individuals could
have a materially adverse impact on our operations. On December 1, 2001, we
entered into an employment agreement with our President. During November 2004,
the Company entered into consulting agreements with two officers to provide
management consulting services.




Dependence on One or a Few
Customers.For the year ended February 29, 2008, two customers
(Food for Health and Wellness Enterprises) individually accounted for greater
than 10 percent of total sales. In addition two other customers (Healthy
Directions and Advanced Filtration) individually account for approximately 5% of
total sales.  Management believes that if the targeted revenues are
not achieved within their current marketing and distribution agreements, the
revenues can be replaced through the sale of filters and related products to
other direct marketing companies. However, there can be no assurance that this
will occur which could result in an adverse effect on the Company’s financial
condition or results of operations in the future.





Our Senior Management’s Limited
Experience Managing A Publicly Traded Company May Divert Management’s Attention
From Operations and Harm Our Business.  Our management team has
relatively limited recent experience managing a publicly traded company and
complying with federal securities laws, including compliance with recently
adopted disclosure requirements on a timely basis.  Our management
will be required to design and implement appropriate programs and policies in
responding to increased legal, regulatory compliance and reporting requirements,
and any failure to do so could lead to the imposition of fines and penalties and
harm our business.





The Acquisition of Other Technologies
Could Result In Operating Difficulties, Dilution and Other Harmful
Consequences.  We may selectively pursue strategic
acquisitions, any of which could be material to our business, operating results
and financial condition.  Future acquisitions could divert
management’s time and focus from operating our business.  In addition,
integrating an acquired technology is risky and may result in unforeseen
operating difficulties and expenditures.





The
anticipated benefits of our future acquisitions may not
materialize.  Future acquisitions or dispositions could result in
potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, including our common
stock, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses,
or write-offs of intellectual properties any of which could harm our financial
condition.  Future acquisitions may also require us to obtain
additional financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at
all.





We Face Risks Associated With
Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations.Although we currently
transact business primarily in U.S. dollars, a large portion of our revenues and
related cost of goods sold may be determined in foreign currencies if we
continue to expand our international operations.  Conducting business
in currencies other than U.S. dollars subject the Company to fluctuations in
currency exchange rates that could have a negative impact on our reported
operating results.  Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar
relative to other currencies may impact our revenue, cost of goods sold and
operating gross margin and result in foreign currency translation gains and
losses.  Historically, we have not engaged in exchange rate hedging
activities.








-
8 -





Changes to Financial Accounting or
Other Standards May Affect Our Operating Results and Cause Us To Change Our
Business Practices.     We prepare our
consolidated financial statements to conform to generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP, in the United States.  These accounting
principles are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB), the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board and various other bodies.  A change in
those policies could have a significant effect on our reported results
and may affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is
announced.




For
example, the Company has used stock warrants, restricted stock, and other equity
incentives as a fundamental component of our executive compensation
packages.  The Company believes that stock warrants and other equity
incentives directly motivate our executives to maximize long-term stockholder
value and, through the use of vesting, encourage executives to remain with the
Company.   In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), which requires that grants of equity
incentives be recognized on the income statement based upon their fair
values.  In addition, regulations implemented by the NASDAQ National
Market generally require stockholder approval for all equity
incentives.  We may, as a result of these changes, incur increased
compensation costs, change our equity compensation strategy or find it difficult
to attract, retain and motivate employees, each of which could materially and
adversely affect our business, operating results and financial
condition.




Our Financial Results Could Vary
Significantly From Quarter to Quarter and Are Difficult to
Predict.   Our revenues and operating results could vary
significantly from quarter to quarter because of a variety of factors, many of
which are outside of the Company’s control.  As a result, comparing
our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be
meaningful.  In addition, we may not be able to predict our future
revenues or results of operations.  We base our current and future
expense levels on our internal operating plans and anticipated sales levels, and
our operating costs are to a large extent fixed.  As a result, we may
not be able to reduce our costs sufficiently to compensate for an unexpected
shortfall in revenues, and even a small shortfall in revenues could
disproportionately and adversely affect financial results for that
period.  In addition, any payments due to us from our customers may be
delayed because of changes or issues with those customers’
processes.





If We Continue to Fail in Maintaining
Effective Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, The Price of Our Common
Stock May be Adversely Affected.  We Have Determined That Our Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting Have Material Weaknesses and Conditions That
Need to Be Addressed, The Disclosure of Which May Have an Adverse Impact on the
Price of Our Common Stock.  We are required to establish and
maintain appropriate internal control over financial
reporting.  Failure to establish those controls, or any failure of
those controls once established, could adversely impact our public disclosure
regarding our business, financial condition or results of
operations.  In addition, our future assessments of internal control
over financial reporting may identify additional weaknesses and conditions that
need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or other
matters that may raise concerns for investors.  Any actual of
perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal
control over financial reporting, disclosure of management’s assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting or disclosure of our independent
registered public accounting firm’s attestation report, when applicable, on
management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting may
have an adverse impact of our common stock.





Standards for Compliance with Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are Uncertain, and If We Fail to Comply in
a Timely Manner, Our Business Could Be Harmed and Our Stock Price Could
Decline.Rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require annual assessment of our internal control
over financial reporting, and attestation of our assessment by our independent
registered public accounting firm.  Currently, we believe these two
requirements apply to our annual reports for fiscal 2008 and 2009,
respectively.  The standards that must be met for the management to
assess the internal control over financial reporting as effective are evolving
and complex, and require significant documentation, testing, and possible
remediation to meet the detailed standards.  We have incurred, and
expect to incur, significant expenses and to devote resources to Section 404
compliance during the remainder of fiscal year 2009 and on an ongoing
basis.  It is difficult for us to predict how long it will take to
complete the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting for each year and to remediate any deficiencies in our
internal control over financial reporting.  As a result, we may not be
able to complete the assessment and remediation process on a timely
basis.  In addition, the attestation process by our independent
registered public accounting firm is new and we may encounter problems or delays
in completing the implementation of any requested improvements and receiving an
attestation of our assessment by our independent registered public accounting
firm.  In the event that our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, or independent registered public accounting firm determine that our
internal control over financial reporting is not effective as defined under
Section 404, we cannot predict how regulators will react of how the market
prices of our shares will be affected, however, we believe that there is a risk
that investor confidence and share value may be negatively
impacted.





Maintaining and Improving Our
Financial Controls and The Requirements Of Being a Public Company May Strain Our
Resources, Divert Managements Attention and Affect Our Ability to Attract and
Retain Qualified Members For Our Board of Directors.As a
public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  The
requirements of these rules and regulations increase our legal, accounting, and
financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming
and costly and may also place undue strain on our personnel, systems, and
resources.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires, among other
things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and
internal controls over financial reporting.  Fulfilling this
requirement can be difficult to achieve and maintain.





-
9 -





We have a
substantial effort ahead of us to remediate our control deficiencies and
material weaknesses we have identified during the fiscal year
2008.  As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other
business concerns, which could harm our business, operating results and
financial condition.  These efforts will also involve substantial
accounting related costs.








ITEM
2.   Description of
Property.





As of
February 29, 2008, our business office was located at 33012 Calle Perfecto, San
Juan Capistrano, CA 92675. Our telephone number at this address is 949-234-1999.
We pay a total of approximately $8,300 in rent per month for approximately 7,200
square feet of office, operations and warehousing. We have a lease with an
unaffiliated third party, which was renewed in  January 2008 will
expire in August 2009.




We own
two patents and numerous trade secrets, see Proprietary Information and
Technology above, and other proprietary information related to our business
operations. We recently filed for two trademarks: Seychelle which has been used
in commerce since 1997 and Aqua Gear, which had been previously abandoned by
Aqua Gear USA, to capitalize on the license agreement we secured from
them.






ITEM
3.   Legal Proceedings.





As of the
date of this document, we know of no legal proceedings pending or threatened or
judgments entered against the Company or any of our directors or officers in his
or her capacity as such.







ITEM
4.   Submission of Matters to a
Vote of Security Holders.





We did
not submit any matter to a vote of security holders through solicitation of
proxies during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year.








PART
II





ITEM
5.    Market for Common Equity and
Related Stockholder Matters.





(a)  
 Principal Market
or Markets





Our
Common Stock began trading in 1997 on the NASDAQ’s “Electronic Bulletin Board"
OTCBB.  Since the consummation of the Exchange Agreement between our
Company and SWT, market makers and other dealers have provided bid and ask
quotations of our Common Stock under the symbol "SYEV." We de-listed from the
OTCBB in 2002 and were traded on the "Pink Sheets" from December 2002 to March
11, 2008 when we were re-listed on the OTCBB. The table below represents the
range of high and low bid quotations of our Common Stock as reported during the
reporting period herein. The following bid price market quotations represent
prices between dealers and do not include retail markup, markdown, or
commissions; hence, they may not represent actual transactions. For the fiscal
year ended February 29, 2008, the common stock was at a High bid price of $.51
and a Low bid price of $.19.





-
10 -











Fiscal
      Year 2008
            High
      Bid
            Low
      BidQuarter
      Ended:First
      Quarter May 2007
            $.42
            $.26Second
      Quarter August 2007
            $.42
            $.29Third
      Quarter November 2007
            $.51
            $.20Fourth
      Quarter February 2008
            $.40
            $.19











Fiscal Year 2007
            High
      Bid
            Low
      BidQuarter
      Ended:First
      Quarter May 2006
            $.81
            $.43Second
      Quarter August 2006
            $.59
            $.40Third
      Quarter November 2006
            $.70
            $.30Fourth
      Quarter February 2007
            $.51
            $.40




(b)   
Approximate Number of Holders of Common Stock




As of
February 29, 2008, there were approximately 367 shareholders of record of our
common stock.





(c)   
Dividends




Holders
of our common stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by
our Board of Directors. Seychelle paid no dividends on the common stock during
the periods reported herein nor do we anticipate paying such dividends in the
foreseeable future.






ITEM
6.     Management's Discussion and
Analysis or Plan of Operation





This
discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the operating results,
financial condition, liquidity and cash flows of the Company and its subsidiary
for the fiscal years ended February 28, 2007 and February 29,
2008.  The discussion and analysis that follows should be read
together with the consolidated financial statements of Seychelle Environmental
Technologies, Inc. and the notes to the consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-KSB.  Except for
historical information, the matters discussed in this section are forward
looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties and are based upon
judgments concerning various factors that are beyond the Company’s
control.








-
11 -





Application
of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates





Our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues,
and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s
application of accounting policies.





Critical
accounting policies for us include our accounting for inventory reserves,
intangible assets, and share based payment arrangements.





Inventory
Reserves





At each
balance sheet date, the Company evaluates its ending inventory for excess
quantities and obsolescence.  This evaluation includes an analysis of
sales levels by product type.  Among other factors, the Company
considers current product configurations, historical and forecasted demand,
market conditions and product life cycles when determining the net realizable
value of the inventory.  This requires significant judgments including
estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts,
estimation of the long-term rate of growth for our business, and the period over
which cash flows will occur. Provisions are made to reduce excess or obsolete
inventories to their estimated net realizable values.  Once
established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis
of the excess or obsolete inventory.  The Company’s reserve for excess
and obsolete inventory amounted to $193,645 as of February 29,
2008.





Intangible
Assets





Intangible
assets for us are patents, trademarks and other rights. Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, requires that goodwill and other intangible assets be tested for
impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a
reporting unit below its carrying value. These events or circumstances could
include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, operating
performance indicators, competition or sale or disposition of a significant
portion of an operating unit. Application of the impairment test requires
judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assignment of assets
and liabilities to reporting units, assignment of intangibles to reporting
units, and determination of the fair value of each reporting unit. The fair
value of each reporting unit is estimated using a discounted cash flow
methodology. This requires significant judgments including estimation of future
cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the
long-term rate of growth for our business, the useful life over which cash flows
will occur, and determination of our weighted average cost of capital. Changes
in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of
fair value and/or intangible impairment.





Share
Based Payment





SFAS No.
123(R), Share Based
Payment, requires companies to estimate the fair value of share based
payments on the date of grant. For stock grants, the Company uses the closing
price on the date of grant. For warrants, we use the Black Scholes option
pricing model. In order to estimate the fair value of the warrants, certain
assumptions are made regarding future events. Such assumptions include the
estimated future volatility of the Company’s stock price, the expected lives of
the awards and the expected forfeiture rate. Changes in these estimates would
change the estimated fair value of the awards and the corresponding accounting
for the rewards.





Recent
Accounting Pronouncements





In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS
No. 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133.This standard requires companies to provide enhanced
disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company has not yet adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 161, but does not expect it to have a material impact on
its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.





-
12 -





In
December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 regarding
the use of a "simplified" method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in
developing an estimate of expected term of "plain vanilla" share options in
accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based
Payment.  In particular, the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it
will accept a company's election to use the simplified method, regardless of
whether the company has sufficient information to make more refined estimates of
expected term. At the time SAB 107 was issued, the staff believed that more
detailed external information about employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee
exercise patterns by industry and/or other categories of companies) would, over
time, become readily available to companies. Therefore, the staff stated in SAB
107 that it would not expect a company to use the simplified method for share
option grants after December 31, 2007. The staff understands that such detailed
information about employee exercise behavior may not be widely available by
December 31, 2007. Accordingly, the staff will continue to accept, under certain
circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. The
Company currently uses the simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options
and warrants, and will assess the impact of SAB 110 for fiscal year 2009. It is
not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No.
51.  This statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in
a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be
reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Before this
statement was issued, limited guidance existed for reporting noncontrolling
interests. As a result, considerable diversity in practice existed. So-called
minority interests were reported in the consolidated statement of financial
position as liabilities or in the mezzanine section between liabilities and
equity. This statement improves comparability by eliminating that diversity.
This statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, January 1, 2009,
for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier adoption is prohibited. The
effective date of this statement is the same as that of the related Statement
141 (revised 2007). The Company will adopt this Statement beginning March 1,
2009. It is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.





In
December 2007, the FASB, issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations.’This
Statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, but
retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141.  This
Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer: (a)
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business
combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (c) determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. The
effective date of this statement is the same as that of the related FASB
Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements.  The Company will adopt this
statement beginning March 1, 2009. It is not believed that this will have an
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.





In
February 2007, the FASB, issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
115.  This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This option is
available to all entities. Most of the provisions in FAS 159 are elective;
however, an amendment to FAS 115 Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities applies to all entities with available for
sale or trading securities. Some requirements apply differently to entities that
do not report net income. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an
entities first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption
is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the
entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also
elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157 Fair Value
Measurements.  The Company will adopt SFAS No. 159 beginning
March 1, 2008 and is currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of
this pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial
statements.





In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements  This statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement
applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, the Board having previously concluded in those accounting
pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute.
Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value measurements.
However, for some entities, the application of this statement will change
current practice. This statement is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the
reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year,
including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year.
The Company will adopt this statement March 1, 2008, and it is not believed that
this will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.








-
13 -





Results
of Operations





Our
summary historical financial data is presented in the following table to aid you
in your analysis.  You should read this data in conjunction with this
section entitled Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, our consolidated financial statements and the related
notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
report.  The selected consolidated statements of operations data for
the fiscal years ended February 28, 2007 and February 29, 2008 are derived from
our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
report





Fiscal year ended February
29, 2008 compared to the corresponding period in fiscal
2007.




Selected Financial
Data








Years
      EndedFebruary
      29,
            
            
            February
      28,
            
            
            
            
            
            Percentage2008
            
            
            2007
            
            
            Difference
            
            
            ChangeSales
            
            $
            858,769
            
            
            $
            952,646
            
            
            
            (93,877
            )
            
            
            -10
            %Cost
      of sales
            
            
            491,066
            
            
            
            851,970
            
            
            
            (360,904
            )
            
            
            -42
            %Gross
      profit
            
            
            367,703
            
            
            
            100,676
            
            
            
            267,027
            
            
            
            265
            %Gross
      profit percentage
            
            
            43
            %
            
            
            11
            %Selling
      and marketing expenses
            
            
            33,645
            
            
            
            101,338
            
            
            
            (67,693
            )
            
            
            -67
            %General
      and administrative expenses
            
            
            719,517
            
            
            
            847,785
            
            
            
            (128,268
            )
            
            
            -15
            %Loss
      from operations
            
            
            (385,459
            )
            
            
            (848,447
            )
            
            
            462,988
            
            
            
            -55
            %Interest
      expense
            
            
            (55,851
            )
            
            
            (632,056
            )
            
            
            576,205
            
            
            
            -91
            %Interest
      income
            
            
            7,887
            
            
            
            16,205
            
            
            
            (8,318
            )
            
            
            -51
            %Other
      income
            
            
            169,961
            
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            169,961
            
            
            NANet
      loss
            
            
            (263,462
            )
            
            
            (1,464,298
            )
            
            
            1,200,836
            
            
            
            -82
            %Net
      cash used in operating activities
            
            
            (271,785
            )
            
            
            (361,621
            )
            
            
            89,836
            
            
            
            -25
            %Net
      cash provided by (used in) investing activities
            
            
            135,967
            
            
            
            (216,000
            )
            
            
            351,967
            
            
            
            -163
            %Net
      cash provided by (used in) financing activities
            
            
            118,946
            
            
            
            (21,225
            )
            
            
            140,171
            
            
            
            -660
            %





Sales. The decrease in sales
is primarily attributable to a reduction in sales to a key customer. Sales to
this customer decreased by $285,000 between 2007 and 2008 which was partially
attributable to the elimination of distribution income in the fiscal year ended
February 29, 2008. Approximately $110,000 of sales in the fiscal year ended
February 28, 2007 was distribution income.  This decrease was
partially offset by an increase in sales to another key customer of $111,000
over the same period. Overall, the number of bottles sold with or without
replacement filters decreased by approximately 21% (from 108,000 bottles during
2007 to 85,000 bottles during 2008) while the average sales price per bottle
increased by 15%.   The increase in the blended average sales
price is due to volume discounts provided in 2007 to the key customer who did
not purchase as much product in 2008. Sales increased in the year ended February
28, 2007 due to a new distribution agreement. This revenue did not recur in the
year ended February 29, 2008. As a result of this decrease in sales which was
isolated to the distribution agreement, we do not expect continued reductions in
revenue. Management is actively pursuing additional sales opportunities and we
expect sales in the year ending February 28, 2009 to be comparable to or higher
than the level in the year ended February 28, 2008.








-
14 -





Cost of sales and gross profit
percentage.The decrease in cost of sales and corresponding
increase in gross profit dollars and gross profit percentage is primarily due to
the following: (1) the Company’s write off of inactive and obsolete
inventory of approximately $215,400 in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007,
which reduced the gross profit percentage by 13% in the prior year; and (2)
the change in pricing of bottles without a corresponding change in product
costs. Such change increased the gross profit percentage the fiscal year ended
February 29, 2008 by 11%. As previously noted, the average sales price for
bottles increased. However the actual average cost of producing the bottles
decreased by 23% from fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2008. The decrease in
production costs was primarily due to changes made in the bottle design to
reduce the number of components in each product. We expect the gross profit
percentage to remain constant going forward.




Selling and marketing
expenses.  The decrease in selling expenses is primarily due to
a public relations campaign which began during the 2007 fiscal year. This
campaign cost approximately $45,000, and most of it was included in 2007. We
also increased advertising in 2007 to promote the Company’s new products. The
level of advertising was lower in 2008. Sales and marketing costs are expected
to remain at approximately the same level in the year ending February 28, 2009
as compared to fiscal 2008.




General and administrative expenses.The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to
the following : (1) There was a decrease in compensation to executive officers
which was primarily due to various grants of restricted stock and warrants in
prior years. The amortization of the value of these instruments finished during
the year ended February 28, 2007. Since we no longer had this amortization, the
amount of executive compensation was less during the year ended February 29,
2008. There were new warrants issued to these executives in late December 2007,
but these warrants only had approximately two months of amortization in the year
ended February 29, 2008. (2) During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007, the
Company recorded an impairment charge of $3,200 due to the expiration of a
patent.  During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, the Company
determined that there were no long lived assets in need of
impairment.





These
reductions in cost were partially offset by (1) a full-time internal accountant
being hired in September 2006 that is still with the Company (2) $11,000
increase in insurance due to coverage increase; (3) significant increase in
outside services due to an external company hired to assist with SOX compliance
and an external company hired at the end of the prior fiscal year to monitor all
Company computers; (4) increase in accounting fees since the Company incurred
higher fees to catch up on SEC filings and respond to SEC comment letters; and
(5) decrease in legal fees due to no claims in the fiscal year.




Interest expense.The large
interest expense for the year ended February 28, 2007 was due to a significant
charge for warrants given to the holder of the Company’s notes payable. In the
year ended February 29, 2008, the value of warrants given to the note holder was
much lower.





Interest income. The reduction
in interest income was due to a combination of lower interest rates available on
deposits and lower balances being carried at the bank.





Other income. The other income
during the year ended February 29, 2008 was a legal settlement. This income is
not expected to recur in 2009.





Net loss. The net loss for the
fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 was $263,462 or 82% less than 2007 due to a
reduction of $568,000 in interest expense, a reduction of $113,000 in consulting
expenses, and a reduction of $365,000 in the cost of sales (see
above).





Fiscal year ended February
28, 2007 compared to the corresponding period in fiscal
2006.




Selected
      Financial Data
            
            February
      28,
              2006
            
            
            February
      28,
              2007
            
            
            Difference
            
            
            Percentage
              ChangeSales
            
            $
            751,844
            
            
            $
            952,646
            
            
            $
            200,802
            
            
            
            27Cost
      of sales
            
            $
            430,134
            
            
            $
            851,970
            
            
            $
            368,736
            
            
            
            86Gross
      profit
            
            $
            321,710
            
            
            $
            100,676
            
            
            $
            (167,934
            )
            
            
            (52
            )Gross
      profit percentage
            
            
            43
            %
            
            
            11
            %
            
            
            (27
            )
            
            
            -Selling
      expenses
            
            $
            59,459
            
            
            $
            101,338
            
            
            $
            41,879
            
            
            
            70General
      and administrative expenses
            
            $
            583,157
            
            
            $
            847,785
            
            
            $
            113,936
            
            
            
            20Interest
      expense
            
            $
            272,653
            
            
            $
            615,851
            
            
            $
            348,416
            
            
            
            128Net
      loss
            
            $
            932,456
            
            
            $
            1,464,298
            
            
            $
            (531,842
            )
            
            
            (57
            )Net
      cash used in operating activities
            
            $
            (205,072
            )
            
            $
            (361,621
            )
            
            $
            (156,549
            )
            
            
            (76
            )Net
      cash used in investing activities
            
            $
            (117,251
            )
            
            $
            (216,000
            )
            
            $
            (98,749
            )
            
            
            (84
            )Net
      cash provided by (used in) financing activities
            
            $
            934,110
            
            
            $
            (21,225
            )
            
            $
            (955,335
            )
            
            
            (102
            )







-
15 -





Sales. The increase in sales
is primarily attributable to approximately $329,000 in sales of 18 ounce bottles
and related accessories to Food For Health combined with approximately $110,000
in distribution income relating to shipments of approximately $615,000 in
various emergency preparedness products manufactured and shipped directly from
the Chinese manufacturer to Food For Health.  These increases in sales
were partially offset by normal fluctuation of sales with a significant
distributor.   Sales to Wellness Enterprises decreased from
approximately $183,000 during 2006 to $115,000 in 2007. Also, one-time sales of
flip-top caps with an approximate value of $91,000 and $39,000, were made
to two separate customers during 2006.  Overall, the number of bottles sold
with or without replacement filters increased by approximately 13% (from 95,800
bottles during 2006 to 108,000 bottles during 2007).  The average
sales price per bottle decreased by 3% from approximately $6.01 during 2006 to
$5.80 during 2007.   This decrease in average sales price is due
to volume discounts provided to Food For Health.  The Company does not
anticipate any additional distribution income to be earned during the fiscal
year ending February 28, 2008.




Cost of sales and gross profit
percentage.The increase in cost of sales and corresponding
decrease in gross profit percentage is primarily due to the following
–  (1) the Company’s write off of inactive and obsolete inventory of
approximately $215,400, which reduces the gross profit percentage by
13%; and (2) change in pricing of bottles without a corresponding change in
product costs reduced the gross profit percentage by 11%. As previously noted,
the average sales price for bottles decreased, however, the actual average cost
of producing the bottles increased from $2.38 as of February 28, 2006 to $2.65
as of February 28, 2007.   The increase in production costs was
primarily due to increased raw material and outside assembly costs.




Selling
expenses.  The increase in selling expenses is primarily due to
a public relations campaign during the 2007 fiscal year of approximately
$45,000, combined with increased advertising to promote the Company’s new
products.




General and administrative expenses.The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to
the following - (1) approximate $32,000 increase in salaries and related
benefits as the Company hired an administrative assistant during June 2005; (2)
approximate $52,000 increase in legal fees, including $19,000 relating to a
claim settlement; (3) approximate $33,000 increase in consulting expense as the
Company engaged an outside consultant to maintain its accounting records, as
well as engaged various individuals to perform design and engineering
procedures, including amortization of the estimated value of warrants; (4)
approximate $17,000 increase in bonuses to employees or consultants as the
Company issued restricted common shares as additional compensation; and (5)
approximate $16,000 increase in depreciation expense.  These increases
were partially offset by a reduction of approximately $67,000 in accounting fees
since in the prior year the Company incurred higher fees to catch up on SEC
filings and respond to SEC comment letters.




Compensation to executive
officers. The decrease in compensation was primarily due to the end of
the vesting period (December 1, 2006) for all grants of common stock or warrants
issued to Messrs. Parsons and Place.   Previously, since the
common stock and warrants were at a purchase price below the Company’s market
price on the date of grant, the Company amortized the difference over the
vesting period.  This decrease in compensation was partially offset by
the Company, commencing October 2006, paying a monthly stipend of $2,500 to
Messrs. Parsons and Place (total stipends paid during fiscal 2007 were $25,000).




Impairment of intellectual
properties.  During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007,
the Company recorded an impairment charge of  $3,200 due to the
expiration of a patent.  During the fiscal year ended February 28,
2006, the Company determined that the Enviro(3)Care system was no longer
economically feasible and recorded an impairment charge of
$104,000.





Interest expense to related parties.The increase in interest expense was due to the Company adopting SFAS No.
123(R) during the first quarter of fiscal 2007, which changed the valuation
methodology of the non-vested common stock / warrants and amortized the
difference over the vesting period.




Net loss. Net loss for the
fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 of $1,464,298 was greater than in the prior
year loss of $932,456 due to approximately $315,000 in accounting and legal fees
to assist in the audit and preparation of the Form 10 and other SEC filings,
$621,000 in financing costs with TAM Trust, the Company’s primary lender, the
amortization of $146,000 in officer stock compensation,  $46,000 in
warrants provided to Gary Hess in connection with Aqua Gear products and the
Company’s inventory reserve adjustment of $215,000 for the countertop and water
pitcher products were the primary reasons for the result





-
16 -





CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS AND OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS





The
Company has various contractual obligations, which are recorded as liabilities
in the consolidated financial statements. Other items, such as certain lease
agreements are not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial
statements but are required to be disclosed. For example, the Company is
contractually committed to make certain minimum lease payments to rent its
current corporate location.





The
following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations on an
undiscounted basis as of February 29, 2008 and the future periods in which such
obligations are expected to be settled in cash or converted into the Company’s
common stock. In addition, the table reflects the timing of principal and
interest payments on outstanding borrowings. Additional details regarding these
obligations are provided in footnotes, as referenced below:





ConvertibleLess
      Than
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            More
      Than
            
            
            to
      StockTotal
            
            
            1
      Year
            
            
            1-
      2 Years
            
            
            2-3
      Years
            
            
            3
      Years
            
            
            or
      WarrantsAccounts
      payable and accrued liabilities
            
            $
            133,356
            
            
            $
            133,356Customer
      deposits
            
            
            66,951
            
            
            
            66,951Accrued
      interest to related party (1)
            
            
            221,170
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            $
            221,170Line
      of credit (2)
            
            
            80,000
            
            
            
            80,000Note
      payable to financial institution (3)
            
            
            138,446
            
            
            
            138,446Bridge
      note (4)
            
            
            40,000
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            40,000Note
      payable to related party
            
            
            396,088
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            396,0881,076,011
            
            
            
            418,753
            
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            396,088
            
            
            
            261,170Other
      contractual commitments (5)
            
            
            129,369
            
            
            
            83,412
            
            
            
            43,668
            
            
            
            2,289Total
      contractual obligations
            
            $
            1,205,380
            
            
            $
            502,165
            
            
            $
            43,668
            
            
            $
            2,289
            
            
            $
            396,088
            
            
            $
            261,170(1)
      Accrued interest settled with stock purchase warrants in April
      2008(2)
      Increased to $100,000 in March 2008(3)
      Repayable when the Company sells its airplane(4)
      Bridge note settled in common stock in March 2008(5)
      Office lease commitment expiring August 2009 and office equipment
      lease





The
Company currently estimates monthly cash requirements of $46,000 to cover
general and administrative overhead costs.





As of
February 29, 2008, the Company has unrestricted cash of approximately $20,000
and a backlog of $162,000 in unshipped orders.  The Company believes
that additional funding may still be required in the form of related party notes
or other shareholder investment. During March 2008, the Company received an
additional $75,000 in related party notes to fund operations.  During
April 2008, the TAM Trust committed to providing up to $250,000 in additional
funding, if required.





Liquidity and capital
resources.





Net cash used in operating
activities. During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, the Company
funded its operations though the utilization of customer deposits to pay for raw
material and other production costs. The Company also continues to pay some of
its vendors in common stock instead of cash. Additionally, the Company pays its
related party interest expense in stock purchase warrants. These activities
conserve cash despite the losses incurred during the year. Additionally, the
Company has been successful in collecting its accounts receivable timely, which
also helps with operating cash flow.





-
17 -





Net cash used in investing
activities. The fiscal 2008 increase in cash from investment activities
was primarily due to refinancing the airplane, resulting in a release from the
requirement to hold $150,000 as restricted cash. Capital expenditures were also
lower in fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007.





Net cash used in financing
activities. In 2008, the Company obtained additional financing by
restructuring the airplane note and receiving additional loans from a related
party. These two activities raised an additional $100,000 of funds.





Our
principal sources of liquidity have historically been funds generated from
operating activities and borrowings from one of our principal
shareholders.  As of February 29, 2008, the shareholder has loaned the
Company $396,088 at 10% simple interest, repayable after March 1,
2011.   The Company has also accrued $221,170 for interest costs to
the related party as of February 29, 2008.  The Company believes that
due to the decrease in sales experienced during the fiscal years ended February
29, 2008, additional funding may still be required from the TAM Trust or other
shareholders.  During March 2008, the Company received an additional
$75,000 in funds from the TAM Trust to continue the development of its new
emergency preparedness products.  During April 2008, the TAM Trust
committed to providing up to $250,000 in additional funding, if
required.  The Company believes it has liquidity and committed funds
to meet its operating needs through fiscal 2008.





Capital
expenditures.





We do not
expect any significant capital expenditures in fiscal 2009, except for
additional molds or tooling to supplement our existing capital equipment, which
can be funded out of current cash flow.





Research and
development.





We are
operating in a business that requires extensive and continuing research,
development and testing efforts.  However, there is no separate
allocation of salaries for Carl Palmer in research and
development.   The in-line filter is being redesigned to make it
more applicable to field conditions.





Employees.





We
anticipate no additional executive and non-executive hiring.  Any
projected increase in the business can be handled through the addition of
variable and independent plant contractors and outside consultants.





Causes
for any material changes from period to period.





In the
fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, sales were $858,769 compared to the same
period in the prior year with sales of $952,646. Since sales for the fiscal year
ended February 29, 2008 have decreased from the fiscal year ended February 28,
2007, Company management believes that the business is prepared to re-grow with
both new and current (international and domestic) customers purchasing product.
Our experience is that the general market for the sales of pure water increases
during the summer months. Our experience to date has not shown measurable
increases due to its very limited retail distribution. As previously noted,
gross profit margins have increased due to lower outside assembly labor and raw
material costs and higher sales prices and overall product mix. At this time,
the Company does not know what the impact of the patents expiration will be, as
the expiration will not occur for several years. Finally, there are no
off-balance sheet arrangements to skew sales.




Any seasonal
aspects




We have
not experienced seasonal sales spikes in our sales as a result of our very
limited retail distribution.




Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements: none











-
18 -





ITEM
7.Financial
Statements




















SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.





Consolidated
Financial Statements


Fiscal
Years Ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007

















-
19 -





REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM









To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders


of
Seychelle  Environmental Technologies, Inc.:




We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Seychelle Environmental
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary (the Company) as of February 29, 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit,
and cash flows for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and
February 28, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.




We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.




In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Seychelle
Environmental Technologies, Inc. and subsidiary as of February 29, 2008, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the fiscal years ended
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.





As
discussed in Notes 2 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements, effective
March 1, 2007, the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for
stock-based compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.




As
described in Notes 2 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements,
effective March 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No.109."





/S/WINDES & McCLAUGHRY
ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION


Windes
& McClaughry Accountancy Corporation


Irvine,
California





May 29,
2008




-
20 -







SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET


FEBRUARY
29, 2008














ASSETSCurrent
      assets:Cash
      and cash equivalents
            
            $
            19,851Accounts
      receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accountsof
      $2,094
            
            
            20,709Inventory,
      net
            
            
            383,372Prepaid
      expenses and other current assets
            
            
            23,386Asset
      held for sale
            
            
            149,111Total
      current assets
            
            
            596,429Property
      and equipment, net
            
            
            112,095Intangible
      assets, net
            
            
            23,468Other
      assets
            
            
            6,624Total
      assets
            
            $
            738,616LIABILITIES
      AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITCurrent
      liabilities:Accounts
      payable and accrued expenses
            
            $
            133,356Customer
      deposits
            
            
            66,951Accrued
      interest due to related party
            
            
            221,170Notes
      payable
            
            
            258,446Total
      current liabilities
            
            
            679,923Long-term
      related party notes payable
            
            
            396,088Total
      liabilities
            
            
            1,076,011Commitments
      and contingencies (Note 10)Subsequent
      events (Note 13)Stockholders'
      deficit:Preferred
      stock, 6,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding as of
      February 29, 2008
            
            
            -Common
      stock $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 25,613,670 issued
      and outstanding as of February 29, 2008
            
            
            25,614Additional
      paid-in capital
            
            
            6,322,685Accumulated
      deficit
            
            
            (6,685,694
            )Total
      stockholders' deficit
            
            
            (337,395
            )Total
      liabilities and stockholders' deficit
            
            $
            738,616





The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements





-
21 -








SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY





CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS











Years
      EndedFebruary
      29,
            
            
            February
      28,2008
            
            
            2007Product
      sales
            
            $
            858,769
            
            
            $
            842,646Distribution
      income
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            110,000Total
      sales
            
            
            858,769
            
            
            
            952,646Cost
      of sales
            
            
            491,066
            
            
            
            851,970Gross
      profit
            
            
            367,703
            
            
            
            100,676Selling
      and marketing expenses
            
            
            33,645
            
            
            
            101,338General
      and administrative expenses
            
            
            719,517
            
            
            
            847,785Loss
      from operations
            
            
            (385,459
            )
            
            
            (848,447
            )Interest
      expense
            
            
            (55,851
            )
            
            
            (632,056
            )Interest
      income
            
            
            7,887
            
            
            
            16,205Other
      income
            
            
            169,961
            
            
            
            -Loss
      before income tax expense
            
            
            (263,462
            )
            
            
            (1,464,298
            )Income
      tax expense
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Net
      loss
            
            $
            (263,462
            )
            
            $
            (1,464,298
            )Net
      loss per share:Basic
      and Diluted
            
            $
            (0.01
            )
            
            $
            (0.06
            )Weighted
      average shares outstanding:Basic
      and Diluted
            
            
            25,351,604
            
            
            
            25,013,807





The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements





-
22 -







SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY





CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT







Common
      StockShares
            
            
            Amount
            
            
            Additional
              Paid-In
      Capital
            
            
            Accumulated
              Deficit
            
            
            TotalBalance
      at February 28, 2006
            
            
            24,715,010
            
            
            $
            24,715
            
            
            $
            5,280,340
            
            
            $
            (4,957,934
            )
            
            $
            347,121Contributed
      executive services
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            10,000
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            10,000Issuance
      of common stock for cash
            
            
            53,000
            
            
            
            53
            
            
            
            12,697
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            12,750Issuance
      of common stock in exchange for debt
            
            
            258,597
            
            
            
            259
            
            
            
            165,141
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            165,400Issuance
      of common stock for intellectual property
            
            
            50,000
            
            
            
            50
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            50Issuance
      of common stock for compensation
            
            
            74,289
            
            
            
            74
            
            
            
            36,526
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            36,600Stock
      based interest expense for warrants issued
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            466,230
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            466,230Stock
      based officer compensation for warrants issued
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            135,982
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            135,982Net
      loss
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            (1,464,298
            )
            
            
            (1,464,298
            )Balance
      at February 28, 2007
            
            
            25,150,896
            
            
            
            25,151
            
            
            
            6,106,916
            
            
            
            (6,422,232
            )
            
            
            (290,165
            )Contributed
      executive services
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            10,000
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            10,000Issuance
      of common stock for compensation
            
            
            83,500
            
            
            
            84
            
            
            
            24,545
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            24,629Issuance
      of common stock as partial payment of accounts
    payable
            
            
            389,274
            
            
            
            389
            
            
            
            125,783
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            126,172Warrants
      issued as payment of accrued interest due to related
      party
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            60,509
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            60,509Warrants
      issued for services
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            32,422
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            32,422Buy
      back of common stock
            
            
            (10,000
            )
            
            
            (10
            )
            
            
            (37,490
            )
            
            
            
            
            
            
            (37,500
            )Net
      loss
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            (263,462
            )
            
            
            (263,462
            )Balance
      at February 29, 2008
            
            
            25,613,670
            
            
            $
            25,614
            
            
            $
            6,322,685
            
            
            $
            (6,685,694
            )
            
            $
            (337,395
            )




The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements


-
23 -







SEYCHELLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS








Years
      EndedFebruary
      29,
            
            
            February
      28,2008
            
            
            2007Operating
      activities:Net
      loss
            
            $
            (263,462
            )
            
            $
            (1,464,298
            )Adjustments
      to reconcile net loss to net cashused
      in operating activities:Depreciation
      and amortization
            
            
            43,188
            
            
            
            42,560Provision
      for allowance for doubtful accounts
            
            
            2,094
            
            
            
            3,988Compensation
      and interest exense in stock and warrants
            
            
            57,051
            
            
            
            602,212Contributed
      executive services
            
            
            10,000
            
            
            
            10,000Stock issued for services
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            36,600Gain
      on common stock issued as settlement of payables
            
            
            (47,276
            )
            
            
            -Impairment
      of intellectual property
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            3,200Reserve
      for obsolete and slow moving inventory
            
            
            (49,785
            )
            
            
            216,053(Gain)
      loss on disposal of property and equipment
            
            
            (3,057
            )
            
            
            48,673Effect
      of changes in:Accounts
      receivable
            
            
            50,071
            
            
            
            (43,260
            )Inventories
            
            
            24,776
            
            
            
            (182,774
            )Prepaid
      expenses and other current assets
            
            
            120,805
            
            
            
            (98,920
            )Asset
      held for sale
            
            
            (11,239
            )
            
            
            -Accounts
      payable and accrued expenses
            
            
            (17,545
            )
            
            
            126,672Customer
      deposits
            
            
            (217,324
            )
            
            
            255,227Accrued
      interest due to related party
            
            
            29,918
            
            
            
            82,446Net
      cash used in operating activities
            
            
            (271,785
            )
            
            
            (361,621
            )Investing
      activities:Proceeds
      from sale of property and equipment
            
            
            3,500
            
            
            
            2,500(Decrease)
      increase in restricted cash
            
            
            150,000
            
            
            
            (150,000
            )Purchase
      of property and equipment
            
            
            (17,567
            )
            
            
            (67,483
            )Increase
      in intangible assets
            
            
            (84
            )
            
            
            (1,017
            )Decrease
      in other assets
            
            
            118
            
            
            
            -Net
      cash used in investing activities
            
            
            135,967
            
            
            
            (216,000
            )Financing
      activities:Proceeds
      from the issuance of notes payable
            
            
            179,500
            
            
            
            30,000Proceeds
      from the issuance of notes payable to related
parties
            
            
            96,913
            
            
            
            -Payments
      of notes payable
            
            
            (137,467
            )
            
            
            (63,975
            )Proceeds
      from the sale of common stock
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            12,750Payments
      for buy back of common stock
            
            
            (20,000
            )
            
            
            -Net
      cash provided by financing activities
            
            
            118,946
            
            
            
            (21,225
            )Net
      decrease in cash
            
            
            (16,872
            )
            
            
            (598,846
            )Cash,
      beginning of period
            
            
            36,723
            
            
            
            635,569Cash,
      end of period
            
            $
            19,851
            
            
            $
            36,723Supplemental
      disclosures of cash flow information:Cash
      paid for interest
            
            $
            25,933
            
            
            $
            10,987Cash
      paid for income taxes
            
            $
            -
            
            
            $
            4,800Supplemental
      disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
      activities:Common
      stock issued for services
            
            $
            24,629
            
            
            $
            36,600Common
      stock issued for settlement of debt and accounts
    payable
            
            $
            173,448
            
            
            $
            165,388Warrants
      issued as payment of accrued interest
            
            $
            60,509
            
            
            $
            -Purchase
      of property and equipment with debt
            
            $
            -
            
            
            $
            136,413Common
      stock issued for purchase of technology
            
            $
            -
            
            
            $
            16,100





The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements





-
24 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008









NOTE
1:   ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS





Organization





Seychelle
Environmental Technologies, Inc. (SET), was incorporated under the laws of the
State of Nevada on January 23, 1998 as a change in domicile to Royal Net, Inc.,
a Utah corporation that was originally incorporated on January 24, 1986. Royal
Net, Inc. changed its state of domicile to Nevada and its name to Seychelle
Environmental Technologies, Inc. effective in January 1998.





Seychelle
Water Technologies (SWT) was formed as a corporation in February 1997 under the
laws of the state of Nevada for the purpose of marketing the products of Aqua
Vision International (Aqua Vision), a private California entity operating since
1996. Prior to January 1998, SWT operations were limited primarily to
fundraising and marketing activities.





On
January 30, 1998, SET entered into a stock exchange agreement with SWT, whereby
SWT shareholders emerged as the majority stockholder of SET.  This
reverse acquisition resulted in SWT becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of
SET.





On
January 31, 1998, SET attempted a purchase of the assets of Aqua Vision for $9.5
million.  Only $1.2 million was paid to the Aqua Vision owners and the
transaction was not consummated. Effective February 28, 1999, the Company
revised its Purchase Agreement and issued 8,000 shares of its Series “AAA”
Preferred Stock Cumulative Preferred Voting Stock to Aqua Vision’s owners. As a
result, Aqua Vision’s owners became the ultimate controlling stockholder of
SET.  Because the assets were acquired from existing shareholders, the
$1.2 million payment was treated as a distribution and the Series “AAA” stock
issuance was treated as a recapitalization.





Description of
Business





The
Company designs, manufactures and supplies water filtration systems to the
general public. These systems range from portable water bottles that can be
filled from nearly any available source to units which provide entire water
facilities at the point of entry for a facility.





Management’s
Plan





As
reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has
experienced recurring losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit of
$6,685,694 as of February 29, 2008. These factors, among others, raise
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern.




In view
of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a major
portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which, in
turn, is dependent upon the Company’s ability to continue to raise capital and
ultimately generate positive cash flows from operations. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and
classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be
unable to continue its existence.





Management’s
plan regarding these matters is to develop a reliable source of revenues, and
achieve a profitable level of operation. As of February 29, 2008 the Company had
$19,851 in cash, a backlog of $162,000 in unshipped products and $20,000 of
available borrowings under its line of credit. Over the next twelve months,
management believes that sufficient working capital will be obtained from a
combination of revenues and external financing. However, additional funding may
still be required from the TAM Irrevocable Trust (TAM Trust), a related entity,
or other shareholders. During June 2007, the TAM Trust committed to providing up
to $250,000 in additional funding, if required. Available borrowings under this
commitment as of February 29, 2008 were approximately $153,000.  In
April 2008, the TAM Trust committed to fund up to an addition $250,000 under
similar terms as the current amount outstanding.








-
25 -








SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008










NOTE
2:   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES





Basis of
Presentation





The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.





Principles of
Consolidation





The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SET and its wholly
owned subsidiary, SWT, (collectively the Company). All significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.





Use of
Estimates





The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates made
in preparing the consolidated financial statements include the allowance for
doubtful accounts, sales returns, stock based compensation, inventory reserves,
valuation allowances for property and equipment and intangible assets, deferred
income tax valuation allowances and litigation. To the extent there are material
differences between estimates and the actual results, future results of
operations will be affected.





Cash and Cash
Equivalents





Cash
equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less when purchased.  The Company
maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which at times may exceed federally
insured limits.  The Company has not experienced any losses related to
this concentration of risk.





Accounts
Receivable





The
Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers’ financial
condition and does not require collateral. Trade receivables generally are due
in 30 days. Credit losses have consistently been within management’s
expectations. An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded when it is probable
that all or a portion of trade receivables balance will not be
collected.





As of
February 29, 2008, the Company had four customers which accounted for 28%, 26%,
19% and 13% of net accounts receivable.  The Company had two customers
during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 that accounted for 26% and 18% of
total sales.  The Company had two customers during the fiscal year
ended February 28, 2007 that accounted for 39% and 14% of total
sales.





Inventory





Inventory
is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined on a
first-in, first-out basis; and the inventory is comprised of raw materials and
finished goods. There was no work in process at February 29,
2008.  Raw materials consist of fittings, caps and other components
necessary to assemble the Company’s finished goods.  Finished goods
consist of water bottles and other filtration systems that are available for
shipment to customers.  Finished goods include the costs of materials,
labor and an allocation of overhead.  Total overhead allocated to
inventory as of February 29, 2008 amounted to $134,555.





At each
balance sheet date, the Company evaluates its ending inventory for excess
quantities and obsolescence.  This evaluation includes an analysis of
sales levels by product type.  Among other factors, the Company
considers current product configurations, historical and forecasted demand,
market conditions and product life cycles when determining the net realizable
value of the inventory.  Provisions are made to reduce excess or
obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable values.  Once
established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis
of the excess or obsolete inventory.  The Company’s reserve for excess
and obsolete inventory amounted to $193,645 as of February 29,
2008.





-
26 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008










Asset Held For
Sale





As of
February 29, 2008, the Company’s asset held for sale consisted of an airplane,
which is stated at the lower of its carrying value or estimated fair value less
cost to sell.  The Company determined that the airplane is no longer
necessary in performing


sales
activities and has committed to sell it.  The airplane was purchased
during August 2006.  The Company expects to dispose of this asset
within the next twelve months and does not expect any material loss on the
disposition.




Property and
Equipment





Property
and equipment are stated at cost.  Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable
assets.  The estimated useful lives used in determining depreciation
are three to five years for tooling, five years for computers and vehicles, and
five to seven years for furniture and equipment. Management evaluates useful
lives regularly in order to determine recoverability taking into consideration
current technological conditions.





Maintenance
and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; additions and betterments are
capitalized. Upon retirement or sale, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation of the disposed assets are removed, and any resulting gain or loss
is recorded. Fully depreciated assets are not removed from the accounts until
physical disposition.





Intangible
Assets





Intangible
assets include patents and purchased product rights and technology costs. All
patents and purchased product rights and technology costs are capitalized and
amortized over the expected economic life of five years using the straight-line
method.  The Company assesses whether there has been a permanent
impairment of the value of intangible assets by considering factors such as
expected future product revenues, anticipated product demand and prospects and
other economic factors.





Long-Lived
Assets





In
accordance with FASB Statement No. 144 (Statement 144), Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets, such as property,
plant, and equipment, and purchased intangible assets subject to amortization,
are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances
require a long-lived asset be tested for possible impairment, the Company first
compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset to the
carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is
not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized
to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is
determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow
models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as
considered necessary.





Customer
Deposits





Customer
deposits represent advance payments received for products and are recognized as
revenue in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition
policy.





Fair Value of Financial
Instruments





For
certain financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable
and accrued expenses, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their
relatively short maturities. In the case of the notes payable, the interest rate
on the notes approximates the market rate of interest for similar borrowings.
Consequently the carrying value of the notes payable also approximates the fair
value. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the related party
notes payable due to the relationship of the counterparty.








-
27 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008










Operating
Segments





The
Company operates in one operating segment.





Revenue
Recognition





The
Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
title has passed, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and
collectability is reasonably assured.  These criteria are typically
met when the product is shipped. Revenue is not recognized at the time of
shipment if these criteria are not met.





Certain
of the Company’s sales include a right for the customer to return the product if
they are not satisfied.  The Company has an unconditional return
policy for the first 90 days.  Customers may return the product for a
full refund, or they may receive a replacement at no charge. The same policy
applies to any product sold from the period 91 days after purchase to one year,
for any defects in materials or workmanship.  In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 48, Revenue Recognition When Right of
Return Exists, the Company makes periodic assessments of return activity
and if necessary records a reserve for product returns.





During
the year ended February 28, 2007, the Company functioned as a broker between a
customer and a vendor. Since the Company has no risk of inventory ownership, the
Company recorded its distribution income at the net amount received in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a
Principal versus Net as an Agent.  There was no distribution
income recorded during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008.




Cost of
Sales




Cost of
sales is comprised primarily of the cost of purchased product, as well as labor,
inbound freight costs and other material costs required to complete products.
Overhead costs such as rent, depreciation, purchasing and inspection costs are
allocated between production and administrative costs. The costs allocated to
production are capitalized into inventory and recognized as cost of sales as the
related products are sold.





Shipping and
Handling





All
amounts billed to customers relating to shipping and handling are reported as a
component of product sales. Costs incurred by the Company for shipping and
handling, including transportation costs paid to third party shippers, are
reported as a component of cost of sales.





Sales
Tax





The
Company collects sales tax in various jurisdictions. Upon collection from
customers, it records the amount as a payable to the related jurisdiction. On a
periodic basis, it files a sales tax return with the jurisdictions and remits
the amount indicated on the return. Any difference between what it collected and
what it remits to the taxing authorities is recorded on a net basis into
operations.





Advertising
Expenses





Advertising
expenses are expensed as incurred.  Total advertising expenses
amounted to $12,161 and $44,072 for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and
February 28, 2007, respectively, and are included in selling and marketing
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.





Research and
Development





Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to $1,940 and $7,105
for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007,
respectively. These costs are included in general and administrative expenses in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.








-
28 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008










Share Based
Payment





On March
1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payment, (SFAS
No. 123(R)) which establishes standards for the accounting of transactions in
which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services,
primarily focusing on accounting for transactions where an entity obtains
services in share based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires entities
to measure the cost of services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments, including stock options and warrants, based on the grant date fair
value of the award and to recognize it as compensation expense over the period
required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually the vesting
period. SFAS No. 123(R) superseded the Company’s previous accounting under
Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees.




The
Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) on March 1, 2006 using the modified prospective
transition method. Consequently, the Company’s consolidated financial statements
as of and for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007
reflect the impact of SFAS No. 123(R).





In
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the fair value of share based awards is
calculated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model. This model was
developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable
options without vesting restrictions. As such, the values derived from using
that model can differ significantly from other methods of valuing the Company’s
share based payment arrangements. The Black Scholes model also requires
subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected
time to exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values.  These
factors could change in the future, affecting the determination of share based
payment expense in future periods.





The
weighted average fair value of stock based compensation is based on the single
option valuation approach.  The Company applied an estimated
forfeiture rate of 0% for officer grants, as the vesting periods are
substantially complete.  As of February 29, 2008, there were no
warrants granted to non-officers of the Company and therefore, no forfeiture
rate was utilized.  The estimated fair value of share based
compensation awards is amortized using the straight line method over the vesting
period of the warrants or restricted common shares, as such method is consistent
with the officer's contractual obligation.  The Company’s fair value
calculations for share based compensation awards for the fiscal years ended
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007 were based on the following
assumptions.





Years
      EndedFebruary
      29,
            
            February
      28,2008
            
            2007Expected
      life in years
            
            
            2
            
            1.25
      - 3.75Stock
      price volatility
            
            
            167%
            
            235
      - 323%Risk
      free interest rate
            
            
            2.3
      - 3.1%
            
            3.5%Expected
      dividends
            
            
            None
            
            NoneForfeiture
      rate
            
            
            0%
            
            0%





The
assumptions used in the Black Scholes models referred to above are based upon
the following data: (1) The expected life of the warrant is estimated by
considering the contractual term of the warrant, the vesting period of the
warrant, the officer’s expected exercise behavior and the officer’s post-vesting
turnover rate, if any. (2) The expected stock price volatility of the
underlying shares over the expected term of the warrants is based upon
historical share price data. (3) The risk free interest rate is based on
published U.S. Treasury Department interest rates for the expected terms of the
underlying warrants. (4) Expected dividends are based on historical dividend
data and expected future dividend activity. (5) The expected forfeiture rate is
based on historical forfeiture activity and assumptions regarding future
forfeitures based on the composition of current grantees.










-
29 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008







Income
Taxes





Income
taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Beginning with the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes(FIN 48) as of March 1, 2007, the Company recognizes the effect of income
tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being
sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount
that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or
measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.
Prior to the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized the effect of income tax
positions only if such positions were probable of being sustained.




The
Company records interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest
expense and penalties in selling, general, and administrative
expenses.





Loss Per Common
Share





Basic net
loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted
average number of outstanding common shares (restricted and free trading) during
the periods presented. Basic loss per share and diluted loss per share are the
same amount because the impact of additional common shares that might have been
issued under the Company’s outstanding and exercisable warrants would be
anti-dilutive.





There
were 6,215,642 and 6,209,539 potentially dilutive shares that were excluded from
the shares used to calculate diluted loss per share for the years ended February
29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively, as their inclusion would reduce
the net loss per share.




Concentrations





The
Company has an agreement for a third party to manufacture the Company’s
component parts in China. As of February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, the
Company had prepaid inventory in China of approximately $2,000 and $137,000,
respectively. For the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28,
2007, this vendor accounted for approximately 77% and 47%, respectively, of
total raw material purchases.





Reclassifications





Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior year amounts to conform to the
current year presentation.  Specifically, we have reclassified $48,443
of direct labor costs from general and administrative to cost of sales. We have
also grossed-up our deferred tax assets to better reflect the actual deferred
tax assets at February 28, 2007. These reclassifications have no impact on the
previously reported financial condition, net loss or cash flows.





Recent Accounting
Pronouncements




In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS
No. 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133.This standard requires companies to provide enhanced
disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company has not yet adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 160, but does not expect it to have a material impact on
its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.





-
30 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008










In
December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 regarding
the use of a "simplified" method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in
developing an estimate of expected term of "plain vanilla" share options in
accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based
Payment.  In particular, the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it
will accept a company's election to use the simplified method, regardless of
whether the company has sufficient information to make more refined estimates of
expected term. At the time SAB 107 was issued, the staff believed that more
detailed external information about employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee
exercise patterns by industry and/or other categories of companies) would, over
time, become readily available to companies. Therefore, the staff stated in SAB
107 that it would not expect a company to use the simplified method for share
option grants after December 31, 2007. The staff understands that such detailed
information about employee exercise behavior may not be widely available by
December 31, 2007. Accordingly, the staff will continue to accept, under certain
circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. The
Company currently uses the simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options
and warrants, and will assess the impact of SAB 110 for fiscal year 2009. It is
not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.





In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No.
51.  This statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in
a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be
reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Before this
statement was issued, limited guidance existed for reporting noncontrolling
interests. As a result, considerable diversity in practice existed. So-called
minority interests were reported in the consolidated statement of financial
position as liabilities or in the mezzanine section between liabilities and
equity. This statement improves comparability by eliminating that diversity.
This statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, January 1, 2009,
for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier adoption is prohibited. The
effective date of this statement is the same as that of the related Statement
141 (revised 2007). The Company will adopt this Statement beginning March 1,
2009. It is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.





In
December 2007, the FASB, issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations.’This
Statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, but
retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141.  This
Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer: (a)
recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business
combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (c) determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate
the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. The
effective date of this statement is the same as that of the related FASB
Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements.  The Company will adopt this
statement beginning March 1, 2009. It is not believed that this will have an
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.





In
February 2007, the FASB, issued SFAS No. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
115.  This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This option is
available to all entities. Most of the provisions in FAS 159 are elective;
however, an amendment to FAS 115 Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities applies to all entities with available for
sale or trading securities. Some requirements apply differently to entities that
do not report net income. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an
entities first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption
is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the
entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also
elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157 Fair Value
Measurements.  The Company will adopt SFAS No. 159 beginning
March 1, 2008 and is currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of
this pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial
statements.





In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements  This statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement
applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, the Board having previously concluded in those accounting
pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute.
Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value measurements.
However, for some entities, the application of this statement will change
current practice. This statement is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the
reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year,
including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year.
The Company will adopt this statement March 1, 2008, and it is not believed that
this will have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.





-
31 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008














NOTE
3:   INVENTORY





The
Company’s inventory consisted of the following at February 29,
2008:





Raw
      materials
            
            $
            210,417Finished
      goods
            
            
            366,600577,017Reserve
      for obsolete and slow moving inventory
            
            
            (193,645
            )$
            383,372







NOTE
4:   PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT





The
following is a summary of property and equipment at February 29,
2008:








Tooling
            
            $
            285,242Equipment
            
            
            26,654Vehicles
            
            
            10,000Furniture
      and fixtures
            
            
            15,775Computer
      equipment
            
            
            15,124Leasehold
      equipment
            
            
            4,710357,505Less:
      accumulated depreciationand
      amortization
            
            
            (245,410
            )$
            112,095





Fixed
assets outside the United States included $88,739 in tooling costs located in
China at February 29, 2008. Depreciation expense for the fiscal years ended
February 29, 2008 and 2007 was $43,229 and $41,552, respectively.











-
32 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008














NOTE
5:    INTANGIBLE ASSETS





The
following is a summary of intangible assets at February 29,
2008:





Redi
      Chlor brandname and trademark
            
            $
            16,100Hand
      pump
            
            
            8,000Patents
            
            
            12,72736,827Less:
      accumulated amortization
            
            
            (13,359
            )$
            23,468





During
the fiscal year ended February 29, 2007, the Company wrote off its "bottoms up"
patent as the patent had expired and recorded an impairment loss of
approximately $3,200.  Amortization expense related to intangibles was
$7,160 and $1,008 during the years ended February 29, 2008 and February 28,
2007, respectively.





The
patents expire in nine to ten years, however they and the other intangible
assets are amortized over their estimated useful economic lives of five years.
Amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter is estimated as
follows.





Year
      EndingFebruary 28,2009
            
            $
            7,3662010
            
            
            5,6062011
            
            
            5,1452012
            
            
            5,1452013
            
            
            206Total
            
            $
            23,468








-
33 -







SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008











NOTE
6:    NOTES PAYBLE




Notes
payable outstanding as of February 29, 2008 consisted of the
following:








Line
      of credit with a bank with a maximum borrowing of $100,000 extending
      through June 2008.  The line of credit is collateralized by all
      business assets. Any principal amounts outstanding accrue interest at the
      bank's index rate (6.25% as of February 29, 2008) plus 2% per
      annum.  Total available borrowings as of February 29, 2008
      amounted to $20,000. This line of credit is due in June
      2008.  The line of credit does not contain any restrictive
      financial covenants and the Company intends to renew the line of credit
      for another year when it becomes due.
            
            $
            80,000Note
      payable due to a financial institution, collateralized by the Company's
      airplane, with interest at 7.375% per annum and due in monthly payments
      through September 2032. As the Company expects to dispose of the airplane
      within the next twelve months and use the proceeds to pay off the balance
      of the note payable, the amounts have been classified as a current
      liability on the accompanying consolidated balance
      sheet.
            
            
            138,446Bridge
      note payable received from an individual in February 2008, due within six
      months after issuance and earning no interest.  The outstanding
      amount has been converted to common stock subsequent to February 29, 2008
      (see Note 13).
            
            
            40,000$
            258,446




All of
the above notes payable are recorded as current liabilities as of February 29,
2008.







NOTE
7:   RELATED PARTY NOTES PAYABLE AND ACCRUED
INTEREST




At
February 29, 2008, the Company had outstanding notes payable from the Company’s
primary investor (the TAM Trust) totaling $396,088. These notes bear interest at
10% per annum.  The advances are not repayable until after March 1,
2011 and the repayment of is subordinate to the Company’s line of credit and
note payable to a financial institution (see Note 6).





As of
February 29, 2008, accrued interest on the related party notes payable amounted
to $221,170, which is included in accrued interest due to related party on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.





On
December 19, 2007, the Company granted 250,000 warrants to purchase the
Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.19 per share as partial
payment of accrued interest.  On January 24, 2008, the Company granted
an additional 107,221 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $0.29 per share as payment of accrued interest. The total
value of the warrants amounted to $60,509 using the Black Scholes option pricing
model, which has been recorded as a reduction of the accrued interest due to
related party.





During
June 2007, the TAM Trust committed to providing up to $250,000 in additional
funding, if required, to help fund the operations of the
Company.  Through February 29, 2008, approximately $153,000 of the
original $250,000 was still available to the Company (see Note 13).





-
34 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008














NOTE
8:   EQUITY TRANSACTIONS





Restricted Stock
Grants





On June
27, 2007, the Company granted 42,500 restricted shares of common stock to
employees as payment for services over the next 24 months.  The shares
vest and will be distributed in equal installments over the two-year service
period ended June 2009.  As of the grant date, the market value of the
shares granted amounted to $17,000.  The Company is amortizing the
fair market value of the shares as compensation expense over the two-year
vesting period.  Total compensation expense relating to these shares
recorded for the year ended February 29, 2008 amounted to $5,667.





On
October 23, 2007, the Company granted 41,000 restricted shares of common stock
to employees as a bonus.  As of the grant date, the market value of
the shares granted amounted to $15,170.  The shares vested immediately
and the fair market value of the shares was recorded as compensation expense
during the year ended February 29, 2008.





During
the year ended February 29, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of
$3,792 relating to restricted shares of common stock granted to employees during
the year ended February 28, 2007.  These restricted shares were all
fully vested and expensed as of February 29, 2008.





During
the year ended February, 29, 2008, the Company granted 389,274 restricted shares
of common stock to a vendor as payment of accounts payable.  The total
value of the services provided amounted to $173,448.  The market value
of the shares granted amounted to $126,173.  The gain on the shares
issued as payment for services amounted to $47,276 was recorded as a reduction
of general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended February 29, 2008.





On March
29, 2005, the Company expanded the employment agreement with one officer to
provide management services for the Company. As consideration for services to be
rendered, the officer received 316,312 restricted shares of the Company’s common
stock.  The first third vested on the effective date of the agreement
as an enticement to enter into the agreement.   The remaining
common shares were distributed in equal installments on December 1, 2005 and
2006.  The Company has recorded compensation expense for these
services in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.





On March
29, 2005, the Company granted the TAM Trust 1,972,133 restricted shares of the
Company’s common stock.   The first third vested on the effective
date of the agreement as an enticement to enter into the
agreement.   The remaining common shares were distributed in
equal installments on December 1, 2005 and 2006.   The Company
has recorded interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.





During
November 2004, the Company entered into employment agreements with two officers
to provide management services for the Company. As consideration for services to
be rendered, the officers received 480,000 restricted shares of the Company’s
common stock. The common shares were distributed in equal installments on
December 1, 2004, 2005 and 2006.  The Company has recorded
compensation expense for these services in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.





A summary
of restricted stock grant activity is as follows.





-
35 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008











Weighted-AverageRestricted
            
            
            Grant
      DateShares
            
            
            Fair
      ValueOutstanding
      at March 1, 2006
            
            
            915,187
            
            
            $
            0.24Granted
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Forfeited
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Vested
            
            
            (915,187
            )
            
            
            0.24Outstanding
      at February 28, 2007
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Granted
            
            
            472,774
            
            
            
            0.33Forfeited
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Vested
            
            
            (444,441
            )
            
            
            0.33Outstanding
      at February 29, 2008
            
            
            28,333
            
            
            
            0.40








As of
February 29, 2008, the Company had a total of 28,333 unvested restricted shares
outstanding, which vest through June 2009.  The total unrecognized
compensation expense as of February 29, 2008 to be recognized over this period
amounted to $11,333.





Warrants


On March
29, 2005, the Company expanded the employment agreements with two officers to
provide management services for the Company. As further consideration for
services to be rendered, the officers were granted 1,000,000 warrants redeemable
into restricted shares of the Company’s stock at a purchase price of $.225 per
share.  The first third vested on the effective date of the agreement
as an enticement to enter into the agreement.  The remaining warrants
vested in equal installments on December 1, 2005 and 2006 and are exercisable
through December 1, 2008.  The Company has recorded compensation
expense for these services in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.





On March
29, 2005, the Company granted the TAM Trust 500,000 warrants redeemable into
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at $.225 per
share.  The first third vested on the effective date of the agreement
as an enticement to enter into the agreement.   The remaining
warrants vested in equal installments on December 1, 2005 and 2006 and are
exercisable through December 1, 2008.  The Company has recorded
interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.




On July
27, 2005, the Company expanded the employment agreements with two officers to
provide management services for the Company. As further consideration for
services to be rendered, the officers were granted 500,000 warrants redeemable
into restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of
$.225 per share. The warrants are exercisable any time after December 1, 2006
and expire December 1, 2008. The Company has recorded compensation expense for
these services in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.





On July
27, 2005, the Company granted the TAM Trust 2,000,000 warrants redeemable into
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $.225 per
share. The first third vested on the effective date of the agreement as an
enticement to enter into the agreement.   The remaining warrants
vested in equal installments on December 1, 2005 and 2006 and are exercisable
through December 1, 2008.  The Company has recorded interest expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.




During
January 2006, the Company issued 37,500 common shares to the TAM Trust for
continued financial support.  The Company has recorded interest
expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.








-
36 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008








On July
25, 2006, the Company granted a consultant 100,000 warrants to purchase
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.40
per share for services rendered.  The warrants become fully vested
August 1, 2008 and expire August 1, 2010.  The grant date fair value
of the warrants was $39,320 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The
warrants resulted in expenses of $6,326 during the fiscal year end February 28,
2007 and $21,818 during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008.





On
December 19, 2007, the Company granted two of its officers an aggregate total of
350,000 warrants to purchase restricted common stock of the Company at an
exercise price of $0.19 per share for management services
provided.  These warrants become fully vested on December 1, 2008 and
expire December 1, 2010.  The grant date fair value of the warrants
was $51,250 using the Black Scholes option valuation model. The warrants
resulted in compensation expense of $10,604 during the fiscal year ended
February 29, 2008.





On
December 19, 2007 and January 24, 2008, the Company granted an aggregate total
of 357,221 warrants to purchase restricted common stock of the Company as
payment of accrued interest (see Note 7).  These warrants become fully
vested on December 1, 2008 and expire December 1, 2010.





As of
February 29, 2008, total unrecognized compensation expenses related to unvested
stock warrants was approximately $41,000, which is expected to be recognized as
an expense over the period ending December 2008.





A summary
of warrant activity for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and February
28, 2007 are as follows.







Weighted-AverageWarrants
            
            
            ExerciseOutstanding
            
            
            PriceOutstanding
      at March 1, 2006
            
            
            6,000,000
            
            
            $
            0.23Granted
            
            
            100,000
            
            
            
            0.40Exercised
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Forfeited
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Outstanding
      at February 28, 2007
            
            
            6,100,000
            
            
            
            0.23Granted
            
            
            707,221
            
            
            
            0.21Exercised
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Forfeited
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            -Outstanding
      at February 29, 2008
            
            
            6,807,221
            
            
            
            0.23Vested
      or expected to vest at February 29, 2008
            
            
            6,807,221
            
            
            
            0.23Exercisable
      at February 29, 2008
            
            
            6,000,000
            
            
            
            0.23




The
following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding warrants as of
February 29, 2008:





Warrants
      Outstanding
            
            
            Warrants
      ExercisableWeighted
            
            
            Weighted
            
            
            
            
            
            WeightedAverage
            
            
            Average
            
            
            
            
            
            AverageExercise
            
            
            
            
            
            Remaining
            
            
            Exercise
            
            
            Number
            
            
            ExerciseNumber
            
            
            Life (Years)
            
            
            Price
            
            
            Outstanding
            
            
            Price$
            0.19
            
            
            
            600,000
            
            
            
            2.76
            
            
            $
            0.19
            
            
            
            -
            
            
            $
            0.190.23
            
            
            
            6,000,000
            
            
            
            0.75
            
            
            
            0.23
            
            
            
            6,000,000
            
            
            
            0.230.29
            
            
            
            107,221
            
            
            
            2.76
            
            
            
            0.29
            
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            0.290.40
            
            
            
            100,000
            
            
            
            2.42
            
            
            
            0.40
            
            
            
            -
            
            
            
            0.406,807,221
            
            
            
            
            
            
            $
            0.23
            
            
            
            6,000,000
            
            
            $
            0.23







-
37 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008














Contributed Executive
Services




As the
President of the Company has decided not to accept his salary until the Company
has become profitable, the Company recorded $10,000, the contractual value of
these services, as additional paid in capital in the accompanying consolidated
statements of changes in stockholders’ deficit for the fiscal years ended
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively.







NOTE
9:   INCOME TAXES





The
components of the provision for income taxes for the fiscal years ended February
29, 2008 and February 28, 2007 are as follows:





Years
      EndedFebruary
      29,
            
            
            February
      28,2008
            
            
            2007DeferredFederal
            
            $
            77,045
            
            
            $
            136,173State
            
            
            21,975
            
            
            
            456,33599,020
            
            
            
            592,508Change
      in Valuation Allowance
            
            
            (99,020
            )
            
            
            (592,508
            )Provision
            
            $
            -
            
            
            $
            -





The items
accounting for the difference between income taxes computed at the federal
statutory rate and the provision for income taxes were as follows:





Years
      EndedFebruary
      29,
            
            
            February
      28,2008
            
            
            2007Federal
      statutory rate
            
            
            -34.00
            %
            
            
            -34.00
            %State
      taxes - net of federal benefit
            
            
            -5.61
            %
            
            
            -5.80
            %Meals
      and entertainment
            
            
            0.62
            %
            
            
            0.40
            %Contributed
      Services
            
            
            0.66
            %
            
            
            0.23
            %Penalties
            
            
            0.03
            %
            
            
            0.00
            %Change
      in valuation allowance
            
            
            38.31
            %
            
            
            39.17
            %0.00
            %
            
            
            0.00
            %







-
38 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008








Significant
components of deferred tax assets and (liabilities) are as follows:





February
      29,
            
            
            February
      28,2008
            
            
            2007Net
      operating loss
            
            $
            1,745,026
            
            
            $
            1,605,861Interest
      to related parties
            
            
            94,749
            
            
            
            107,854Inventory
      reserve
            
            
            82,958
            
            
            
            104,286Fixed
      assets and intangibles
            
            
            116,019
            
            
            
            140,617Tax
      credits
            
            
            16,348
            
            
            
            16,348Accrued
      expenses
            
            
            1,769
            
            
            
            -Warrant
      amortization
            
            
            473,608
            
            
            
            449,168Other
            
            
            148
            
            
            
            -Total
      deferred tax assets
            
            
            2,530,625
            
            
            
            2,424,134Deferred
      tax liabilities - State taxes
            
            
            (130,613
            )
            
            
            (123,142
            )Net
      deferred tax asset
            
            
            2,400,012
            
            
            
            2,300,992Valuation
      Allowance
            
            
            (2,400,012
            )
            
            
            (2,300,992
            )Net
            
            $
            -
            
            
            $
            -








At
February 29, 2008, the Company has net operating loss carry forwards for income
tax reporting purposes of approximately $4,490,000 and $2,480,000 available to
offset future federal and California taxable income, respectively. Based on
current tax law, the Company’s federal and state net operating loss carry
forwards will begin to expire in the year ending February 28, 2013 and 2011,
respectively.





At
February 29, 2008, the Company had available tax credit carry forwards comprised
of federal and state research credits of approximately $10,000 and $6,200,
respectively. The federal research credit carry forwards will begin to expire in
the year ending February 28, 2013 and the state research credit will be carried
forwarded until exhausted.





We
periodically evaluate the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets,
and adjust the carrying amount of the deferred tax assets by the valuation
allowance to the extent the future realization of the deferred tax assets is not
judged to be more likely than not. We consider many factors when assessing the
likelihood of future realization of its deferred tax assets, including its
recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of
future taxable income or loss, the carry forward periods available to it for tax
reporting purposes, and other relevant factors.





At
February 29, 2008, based on the weight of available evidence, including
cumulative losses in recent years and expectations of future taxable income, the
Company determined that it was not more likely that its deferred tax assets
would not be realized and has recorded a $2.5 million valuation allowance
associated with its deferred tax assets.





On March
1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income taxes (FIN 48).  FIN 48 prescribes a
comprehensive model of how a company should recognize, measure, present, and
disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company
has taken or expects to take on a tax return.  FIN 48 states that a
tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized if it is "more likely
than not" that the position is sustainable, based upon its technical merits. The
tax benefit of a qualifying position is the largest amount of tax benefit that
is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement
with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant
information.








-
39 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008











Upon
adoption of FIN 48, there was no impact to the Company's consolidated financial
statements.  In addition, future changes in the unrecognized tax
benefit will have no impact on the effective tax rate due to the existence of
the valuation allowance.  The Company estimates that the unrecognized
tax benefit will not change significantly within the next twelve
months.  The Company will continue to classify income tax penalties
and interest as part of general and administrative expense in its statements of
operations.  Accrued interest on uncertain tax positions is not
significant.  There are no penalties accrued as of February 28,
2008.  The following table summarizes the open tax years for each
major jurisdiction:





Jurisdiction
            Open Tax YearsFederal
            2004
      – 2006California
            2003
      - 2006





As the
Company has significant net operating loss carry forwards, even if certain of
the Company’s tax positions were disallowed, it is not foreseen that the Company
would have to pay any taxes in the near future. Consequently, the Company does
not calculate the impact of interest or penalties on amounts that might be
disallowed.








NOTE
10:    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES





The
Company leases an office and production facility under an operating lease that
expires in August 2009.  The Company also leases office equipment
under an operating lease that expires in September 2010.  Total rent
expense amounted to $104,076 and $96,081 for the fiscal years ended February 29,
2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively.





Future
minimum base lease payments are as follows:





Year
      EndingFebruary 28,2009
            
            $
            83,4122010
            
            
            43,6682011
            
            
            2,289Total
            
            $
            129,369





Legal
Proceedings





From time
to time, the Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in
the ordinary course of business.  In the opinion of management, the
ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or
liquidity.





In May
2007, the Company settled a legal dispute which resulted in the Company
receiving a total cash payment of $168,000.  This was a matter
involving the potential infringement of proprietary rights of the
Company.  No litigation was involved and the settlement was informally
negotiated. Neither party admitted liability and all parties released all claims
with respect to each other.  The cash payment was recorded as other
income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended February 29, 2008.





Significant
Agreements





Effective
December 1, 2001, the Company entered into an employment agreement with the
President of the Company. The agreement is for five years and provides for a
salary of $10,000 per year plus one percent of the net after tax profits of the
Company as reported in the Company's Form 10-KSB. The agreement shall be
automatically renewed for successive one-year terms unless the Company or
employee provides written notice of non-renewal.








-
40 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008








In June
2002 the Company entered into a license agreement for a product known as the
“Hand Held Pump Technology.”  The Company licensed all proprietary
rights associated with this technology.  The Company will pay a 2%
royalty on its gross sales for the technology during the term of the license
agreement. The license agreement is for an initial term of five years, with five
successive five-year renewals.  This technology has resulted in a
product called Pump N’ Pure which allows the user to draw filtered water from
virtually any container or location.  The Company has commenced
marketing the Hand Held Pump as part of its Aqua Gear product line to the United
States sporting goods industry.




During
July 2006, the Company signed a second exclusive license agreement for a patent
and ownership of the trademark Aqua Gear. The Company will pay a 2% royalty on
net sales for this technology up to $120,000 and 1% thereafter.  The
license agreement shall continue indefinitely unless terminated due to a default
or breach of the agreement. Products affected include all Aqua Gear trademarked
filter bottles and flip up bottles sold in the product line.  As of
the date of this document, approximately $18,300 in royalties has been paid
under these license agreements.




During
April 2006, the Company issued 50,000 common shares with an approximate value of
$16,100 for the Redi Chlor brand name, trademark and the use of the EPA
Registration Number 55304-4-7126. During the fiscal year ended February 28,
2007, the Company commenced selling the Redi Chlor brand name water chlorine
tablets to consumers, dealers, distributors and manufacturers. In connection
with this agreement, the Company is also obligated to remit a 10% commission on
net sales, as defined, of the existing product, or any new products sold
directly by the Company, and 10% on any product sold by the
counterparty on behalf of Seychelle.  The agreement is for the life of
the Company.  Through February 29, 2008, the Company has paid $2,683
in royalties under this agreement.







NOTE
11:   RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS





The
Company has certain notes payable and accrued interest payable to a related
party (see Note 7 and 13).





During
October 2006, and continuing through December 2007, the Company paid a monthly
monitoring fee of $5,000 to a related party.  Total fees paid to the
related party aggregates $50,000 and $37,000 during the years ended February 29,
2008 and February 28, 2007, respectively, and are included as a component of
general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of
operations.





During
October 2006, the Company commenced paying a monthly stipend of $2,500 to J.
Place and D. Parsons, executive officers of the Company, through December
2007.  The Company has recorded compensation expense for these
services in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.





The
Company has an employment agreement with the company President (see Note
10).








NOTE
12:   GEOGRAPHIC AREAS





The
Company sells its products throughout the United States and internationally.
Geographic information for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2008 and February
28, 2007 is as follows:




2008
            
            
            2007Water
      filtration products sold toexternal
      customers (1) in:The
      United States
            
            $
            800,277
            
            
            $
            870,772China
            
            
            5,021
            
            
            
            36,564Asia,
      except China
            
            
            27,495
            
            
            
            35,917United
      Kingdom
            
            
            12,808
            
            
            
            3,109Other
      countries
            
            
            13,168
            
            
            
            6,284Total
            
            $
            858,769
            
            
            $
            952,646


_____________________




(1)    Sales to external customers are based on the country
of residence of the customer.








-
41 -





SEYCHELLE
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY


NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


February
29, 2008











Long
lived assets at February 29, 2008 are in the following geographic
areas:





UnitedStates
            
            
            China
            
            
            TotalProperty
      and equipment, net
            
            $
            49,624
            
            
            $
            62,471
            
            
            $
            112,095Intangible
      assets
            
            
            23,468
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            23,468Other
      assets
            
            
            6,624
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            6,624$
            79,716
            
            
            $
            62,471
            
            
            $
            142,187








NOTE
13:    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS




In March
2008, the Company borrowed an additional $20,000 from its available line of
credit (Note 6).  After the additional borrowing, the Company has no
remaining available borrowings under the line of credit.





In March
2008, the Company borrowed an additional $75,000 from a related party (the TAM
Trust), under similar terms as the Company’s current outstanding notes payable
(Note 7).  In April 2008, the TAM Trust committed to funding up to an
additional $250,000 under similar terms as the current amounts
outstanding.





In March
2008, the Company issued 133,333 shares of restricted common stock as repayment
of a bridge note payable outstanding in the amount of $40,000 (Note
6).





In March
2008, the Company issued 15,000 shares of common stock as payment of accrued
interest to related party.





In April
2008, the Company issued 1,000,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.33 in
payment of accrued interest. The total grant date fair value of the warrants was
$227,000 which was calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing
model.





In April
2008, the Company issued 700,000 warrants to two executives with an exercise
price of $0.33 for payment of expanded management services. The total grant date
fair value of the warrants was $159,000 which was calculated using the Black
Scholes option pricing model and will be amortized over the two year service
period for which the warrants were granted.





-
42 -











ITEM
8.   Changes in and Disagreements
with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.





None







ITEM
8A.   Controls and
Procedures





Conclusion
Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures





Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an
evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined
under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act).  As a result of this evaluation, we
identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting
as of February 29, 2008.  Accordingly, we concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of February 29,
2008.





Our
internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) are designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that:




i.            pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;


ii.            provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the
preparation of our  consolidated financial statements in


accordance
with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles, and  that our receipts
and expenditures are being made only in accordance with


authorizations
of our management and directors; and


iii.           provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have


a
material effect on the consolidated financial statements.








Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.





Management
is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting.  Our management conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the
framework in Internal Control
— Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  Based on our evaluation,
management has concluded, as of February 29, 2008, we did not maintain effective
control over the financial reporting process because of the
following:





1.            A
shortage of qualified information technology and financial reporting personnel
due to limited financial resources and number of locations created an adjustment
to our consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2008, which was not detected
initially by management.


2.            The
Company did not maintain effective controls to ensure there is timely analysis
and review of accounting records, spreadsheets, and supporting
data.  This control deficiency did not result in audit adjustments to
the fiscal 2008 interim or annual consolidated financial
statements.  However, this control deficiency could result in a
material misstatement of significant accounts or disclosures that would result
in a material misstatement to the Company’s interim or annual consolidated
financial statements that would not be prevented or detected by employees in the
normal course of their assigned functions.   Accordingly,
management has determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material
weakness.


3.            The
Company did not effectively monitor access, maintain effective controls over
change management and operational controls related to certain financial
application data and operating systems.  These control deficiencies
did not result in audit adjustments to the fiscal 2008 interim or annual
consolidated financial statements. However, these control deficiencies could
result in a material misstatement of significant accounts or disclosures that
would result in a material misstatement to the Company’s interim or annual
consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or
detected  by employees in the normal course of their assigned
functions.  Accordingly, management has determined that these control
deficiencies constitutes a material weakness.


4.            The
Company does not maintain a sufficient level of IT personnel to execute general
computing controls over our information technology structure, which include the
implementation and assessment of information technology policies and procedures.
This control deficiency did not result in an audit adjustment to the fiscal 2008
interim or annual consolidated financial statements, but could result in a
material misstatement of significant accounts or disclosures, which would not be
prevented or detected by employees in the normal course of their assigned
functions.  Accordingly, management has determined that this control
deficiency constitutes a material weakness.








-
43 -





Management
has determined that these control deficiencies constituted material weaknesses
in our internal control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008. A
material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control
deficiencies, in ICFR such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of
their assigned functions.





Inherent
Limitations Over Internal Controls





Internal
control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving
financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations, including
the possibility of human error and circumvention by collusion or overriding of
controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system may not prevent
or detect material misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.




Remediation
of Material Weakness




As
discussed in Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, as of
February 29, 2008, there were material weaknesses in our internal control over
financial reporting. To the extent reasonably possible in our current financial
condition, we have authorized the addition of additional information technology
and financial consultants to ensure that there are sufficient resources within
the department to prepare our interim and annual consolidated financial
statements and disclosures in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.  We are taking steps to
create more compensating controls in the financial statement close process to
ensure that there is adequate review and approval by management.




Through
these steps, we believe we are addressing the deficiencies that affected our
internal control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008. However, the
effectiveness of any system of internal controls is subject to inherent
limitations and there can be no assurance that our internal control over
financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors.  We intend to
continue to evaluate and strengthen our ICFR systems. These efforts require
significant time and resources.  If we are unable to establish
adequate ICFR systems, we may encounter difficulties in the audit or review of
our consolidated financial statements by our independent registered public
accounting firm which in turn may have a material adverse effect on our ability
to prepare consolidated financial statements in accordance with U. S. GAAP and
to comply with our SEC reporting obligations.




Attestation
Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.





This
annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent
registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our independent
registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that
permit us to provide only management's report in this annual
report.





Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.





We have
made no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.





ITEM
8B.   Other
Information





Not
Applicable











PART
III





ITEM
9.   Directors, Executive
Officers, Promoters, Control Persons; Corporate Governance; Compliance with
Section 16 (a) of the Exchange Act




Our
Directors and Executive Officers, their ages and positions held in the Company
as of February 29, 2008 are as follows:





NAME
            AGE
            POSITION HELDCarl
      Palmer
            73
            President,
      Chief Executive Officer and DirectorRichard
      Parsons
            73
            Executive
      Vice President, Secretary and DirectorJames
      Place
            69
            Chief
      Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
      Treasurer








-
44 -





Our
Directors have served and will serve in such capacity until the next annual
meeting of our shareholders and until their successors have been elected and
qualified. The officers serve at the discretion of our Directors. The Board of
Directors as a whole serves as the audit committee and Mr. Place is the
“financial expert” within the meaning of the rules and regulations of the
SEC.  The Board of Directors has determined that each of its members
is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and has
substantial business experience that results in that member’s financial
sophistication.  Accordingly, our Board of Directors believes that
each of its members has sufficient knowledge and experience necessary to fulfill
the duties and obligations that an audit committee would have. There are no
family relationships among the Directors or Officers of the Company. None of the
Directors have been involved in the types of litigation specified in Item 401d
of Regulation S-B.




Biographies
of Our Executive Officers and Directors





Carl Palmer. 
Mr. Palmer has been the President, CEO and a Director of the Company since
January 1998. He is the founder of our Company, innovator of the complete line
of Seychelle water filtration products and primary spokesperson worldwide. He is
an internationally recognized expert in the field for over 35 years and
pioneered the development of the reverse osmosis (RO) home and office pure water
business in the U.S. in the late 1970’s. That company, Aq-Ro-Matic, was later
sold to Coca-Cola in 1973. He developed the cellulose triacetate membrane, a
breakthrough technological development in the industry and subsequently, created
and sold pure water companies to Coca Cola Los Angeles as noted previously,
AMF/Cuno in 1985 and Shaklee in 1989. Also, in the late 1980’s Mr. Palmer
developed the Best Water reverse osmosis business for Shaklee and sold over $53
million in above-the-counter systems. Carl’s 30 years of direct sales experience
has led to many significant business relationships, many of which continue
today. He is the inventor of thirteen patented products related to water
purification. Mr. Palmer received a Bachelors Degree from Whittier
College.





Richard Parsons. Mr.
Parsons has been Secretary, Executive Vice President and a Director of the
Company since November 2004. In March 2005, he assumed additional
responsibilities for international sales activities in Asia, including China and
India. He has over 30 years experience in bottled water, reverse osmosis and
water filtration with major companies such as Coca-Cola, Arrowhead, Shaklee, and
Canadian Glacier. Mr. Parsons was a General Manager at Coca-Cola in 1974, a Vice
President at Arrowhead from 1975 to 1985, a consultant with Shaklee in 1988, and
Vice President of U.S. Operations for Canadian Glacier from 1989 to
1990.





For the
past five years, Mr. Parsons acted as a consultant, and then became chairman of
The Beverage Group, Inc. in 2002. In November 2004, he joined the Company as
Executive Vice President. Mr. Parsons ran his own successful consulting business
in water and related beverages with clients such as General Foods, Coke-USA, The
Beverage Group, Coke-Japan and Mitsubishi Industries for many years. He also has
over 20 years experience in direct sales and multilevel marketing with companies
such as Avon, Holiday Magic, Arrowhead and National Education. Mr. Parsons has a
Bachelors Degree from Principia College.




James Place. Mr.
Place has been Treasurer, COO and a Director of our Company since November 2004.
In March 2005, he assumed additional responsibilities for manufacturing,
operations and became the Chief Financial Officer (CFO). In November 2004, he
joined the Company as Chief Operating Officer.   He has over 30
years experience in food, beverages and bottled water. While at Arrowhead, he
took the liter, still and sparkling water business from $10 million to $75
million in 5 years. Mr. Place also had extensive marketing, new product
development and operating experience with Fortune 100 companies such as
Carnation, Kerr Glass and Hunt-Wesson. Mr. Place was Vice President and General
Manager of the Grocery Products Division at Arrowhead from 1981 to 1988, a Vice
President of Sales/Marketing - New Products at Kerr Glass from 1988 to 1990,
Manager, New Products at Carnation from 1979 to 1981 and Sales/Marketing Manager
at Hunt-Wesson Foods from 1970 to 1976.





Mr. Place
also has substantial experience in business development, mergers and
acquisitions and with the investment community. Mr. Place ran his own consulting
business in consumer products including water and other beverages with small to
medium sized companies from 1990 to 2004. This included working successfully
with these companies on financing plans for both new products and expansion
programs. Mr. Place has an MBA from Michigan State University and a Bachelors
degree from Albion College.





Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s
directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a
registered class of the Company’s outstanding equity securities to file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of
changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company.
Officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC
regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they
file.





To the
Company’s knowledge, based solely on its review of the copies of such reports
furnished to the Company during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008, all
Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and
greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with. Messrs. Place and Parsons
and the TAM Trust did not timely file certain  Form 4 reports but have
all filed Forms 5 with respect to their securities transactions.







-
45 -





Code
of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers





On May
20, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the Code of Ethics for
the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers.  The Code
is designed to deter wrong-doing and promote honest and ethical behavior, full,
fair, timely, accurate and understandable disclosure and compliance with
applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.  It is also
designed to encourage prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code to an
appropriate person and provides for accountability for adherence to the
Code.  We will provide to any person without charge, upon written
request to our principal executive offices, a copy of our Code.  Any
waiver of the Code pertaining to one of our executive officers will be disclosed
in a report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.





Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.




The
Company's Bylaws provide that it will indemnify its officers and directors to
the full extent permitted by Nevada state law. The Company's bylaws likewise
provide that it will indemnify and hold harmless its officers and directors for
any liability including reasonable costs of defense arising out of any act or
omission taken on behalf of the Company, to the full extent allowed by Nevada
law, if the officer or director acted in good faith and in a manner the officer
or director reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests
of the corporation.




In so far
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may
be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.







ITEM
9B.    Other
Information




None.







ITEM
10.   Executive
Compensation.





The
following table sets forth the Summary Compensation Table for the Chief
Executive Officer and the executive officers at the end of the last three
completed fiscal years. Compensation does not include minor business-related and
other expenses paid by us. Such amounts in the aggregate do not exceed
$10,000.




SUMMARY
      COMPENSATION TABLELong
      Term CompensationAnnual
      Compensation
            
            Awards
            
            Payouts(a)
            (b)
            (c)
            (d)
            (e)
            
            (f)
            (g)
            
            (h)
            
            (i)Name
      and Principle Position
            Fiscal
              Year
            Salary
              ($)
            Bonus
              ($)
            Other
              Annual
      Compensation
              ($)
            
            Restricted
              Stock
              Award(s)
              ($)(9)
            Securities
              Underlying
              Option/SARs
              (#)
            
            LTIP
              Payouts
              ($)
            
            All
              Other
              Compensation
              ($)Carl
      Palmer
              President
      & CEO
              Director
            2008
              2007
              2006
            $10,000(2)
              $10,000(2)
              $10,000(2)
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            0
              0
              0
            
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00Richard
      Parsons (1)
              Executive
      VP
              Director
            2008
              2007
              2006
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $
      0.00
            
            (3)(5)
              (3)(5)
              (3)(5)(7)
            (4)(6)
              (4)(6)
              (4)(6)
            
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            
            $23,883(8)
              $12,500(8)
              $0.00James
      Place (1)
              COO
              Director
            2008
              2007
              2006
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            $
      0.00
              $  0.00
              $  0.00
            
            (3)
              (3)
              (3)
            (4)
              (4)(6)
              (4)(6)
            
            $0.00
              $0.00
              $0.00
            
            $14,160(8)
              $12,500(8)
              $0.00









-
46 -





___________________




(1)
            Elected
      to Board of Directors during November
2004.




(2)
            Effective
      December 1, 2001, the Company entered into an employment agreement with
      the President of the Company.  The President of the Company has
      decided not to accept his salary until the Company becomes
      profitable.




(3)
            During
      November 2004, Messrs. Parsons and Place were granted 240,000 shares of
      restricted common stock, which vest over two years beginning December 1,
      2004.  The estimated fair market value of the stock as of
      November 30, 2004 was $225,600. The Company amortized the estimated fair
      market value of the unearned compensation over the two-year vesting
      period.  On March 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R),
      which required the Company to revalue the non-vested portion of this
      grant.  As of March 1, 2006, the unearned compensation relating
      to this grant was decreased by approximately $50,500.   The
      Company has recorded compensation expense of approximately $4,000 and
      $75,200 for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2007 and 2006,
      respectively.




(4)
            During
      March 2005, Messrs. Parsons and Place were granted warrants to purchase
      250,000 shares of restricted common stock at $0.225 per share. The first
      third vested on the effective date of the agreement as an enticement to
      enter into the agreement.  The remaining warrants vest in equal
      installments on December 1, 2005 and 2006 but are exercisable through
      December 1, 2008.  The fair market value of the warrants as of
      November 30, 2004 was estimated at
$55,300.




(5)
            During
      March 2005, Mr. Parsons was granted 316,312 shares of restricted common
      stock.  The first third vested on the effective date of the
      agreement as an enticement to enter into the agreement.  The
      remaining common stock vests in equal installments on December 1, 2005 and
      2006.  The fair market value of the restricted shares as of
      November 30, 2004 was estimated at
$79,100.




(6)
            During
      July 2005, the Company expanded the employment agreements with Messrs.
      Parsons and Place to provide management services for the
      Company.  As further consideration for services to be rendered,
      the officers were granted 500,000 warrants redeemable into restricted
      shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.225 per share.  The
      warrants are exercisable any time after December 1, 2006 and expire
      December 1, 2008.  The fair market value of the warrants as of
      July 27, 2005 was estimated at
$30,000.




(7)
            During
      January 2006, the Company issued Mr. Parsons 37,500 shares of common stock
      for services rendered.  As the common stock was issued below the
      Company’s market price at date of grant ($nil cost per share), the Company
      recorded compensation expense relating to the estimated value of these
      shares of $8,437.




(8)
            During
      October 2006, the Company commenced paying a monthly stipend of $2,500 to
      J. Place and D. Parsons through December 2007.  The Company
      recorded compensation expense of $38,043 and $25,000 for the fiscal year
      ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007,
    respectively.




(9)
            Restricted
      Stock (RS)– Awards of restricted stock are valued by multiplying the
      number of shares granted by the closing price on the date of grant, minus
      any consideration paid by the named executives.  Holders of
      restricted stock have voting and dividend rights with respect to their
      restricted shares.  To date, the Company has not declared or
      paid any dividends.




Restricted
Stock – Year End Holdings and Value.  At February 29, 2008, the named
executive officers held the total number of shares of restricted stock indicated
in the following chart.  The year-end value of the total number of
restricted shares, as indicated below, is based on the closing price of the
Company’s stock on February 29, 2008 ($0.41).







-
47 -












Name
            Grant
      date
            Type
            Vesting
              Schedule
            Restricted
      Shares Awarded
            Grant
      Date
              Price
            Grant
      Date
              Value
            Total
      Restricted Shares at February 29, 2008
            Year
      End
              ValueRichard
      Parsons
            11/30/2004
            RS
            33.3%
      on 12/1/04;
              33.3%
      on 12/01/05;
              33.3%
      on 12/1/06
            240,000
            $0.03
            $112,800
            240,000
            $
      46,248Richard
      Parsons
            03/29/2005
            RS
            33.3%
      on 12/1/04;
              33.3%
      on 12/01/05;
              33.3%
      on 12/1/06
            316,312
            $0.03
            $
      79,100
            316,312
            $129,688James
      Place
            11/30/2004
            RS
            33.3%
      on 12/1/04;
              33.3%
      on 12/01/05;
              33.3%
      on 12/1/06
            240,000
            $0.03
            $112,800
            240,000
            $
      46,248




OPTION/SAR
GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR. The Company granted no options during the fiscal
years ended February 29, 2008 and 2007. The Company had no options outstanding
as of the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008.




AGGREGATED
OPTIONS/SARS EXERCISED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION/SAR
VALUES. There were no outstanding options as of the fiscal year ended February
29, 2008.




EMPLOYMENT
CONTRACTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.  Effective December 1, 2001, the
Company entered into an employment agreement with the President of the Company.
The agreement is for five years and provides for a salary of $10,000 per year
plus one percent of the net after tax profits of the Company as reported in the
Company's Form 10-KSB. The agreement shall be automatically renewed for
successive one-year terms unless the Company or employee provides written notice
of non-renewal.




DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION. The Company did not pay any compensation to any of its directors
in fiscal 2008,2007, or 2006.




The Board
of Directors as a whole acts as a compensation committee. We have no retirement,
pension, sharing, stock option, insurance or other similar
programs.





We do not
have a separately designated audit, compensation or nominating committee of our
Board of Directors.  Although we are not a “listed company” under SEC
rules and are therefore not required to have separate committees comprised of
independent directors, we have, however, determined that James Place is
“independent” as that term is defined in Section 4200 of the Marketplace Rules
required by the NASDAQ Stock Market.




Warrant
exercises in last fiscal year





The
following table provides information concerning stock warrants exercised during
the fiscal year 2008 and exercisable and unexercisable stock warrants held by
the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table:





-
48 -








[Missing
Graphic Reference]







ITEM
11.    Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.





The
following sets forth the number of shares of our $0.001 par value common stock
beneficially owned by (i) each person who, as of February 29, 2008, was known by
us to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of its common stock; (ii) our
individual Directors and (iii) our Officers and Directors as a group. As of
February 29, 2008 there were total of 25,613,670,  common shares were
issued and outstanding and 6,807,221, warrants for a total of 32,417,891
shares.




NAME
      AND ADDRESS
            AMOUNT
      AND NATURE OF
            
            PERCENT
      OFOF
      BENEFICIAL OWNER
            BENEFICIAL
      OWNERSHIP (1)(2)(4)
            
            CLASSThe
      TAM Irrevocable Trust
            13,082,799
            (3)
            40.36%4012
      S. Rainbow #K111Las
      Vegas, NV 80103-2012Carl
      Palmer
            -0-
            
            -0-251
      Jeanell Dr., Ste 3Carson
      City, NV 89703Richard
      Parsons
            1,601,312
            
            4.94%251
      Jeanell Dr., Ste 3Carson
      City, NV 89703James
      Place
            1,055,000
            
            3.25%251
      Jeanell Dr., Ste 3Carson
      City, NV 89703All
      officers and directors as a Group (three persons)
            2,656,312
            
            8.19%


_______________





(1)
            All
      ownership is beneficial and of record, unless indicated
      otherwise.




(2)
            Beneficial
      owners listed above have sole voting and investment power with respect to
      the shares shown, unless otherwise
indicated.




(3)
            The
      TAM  Irrevocable Trust is an irrevocable trust for the benefit
      of certain family members of Mr. Carl Palmer. Mr. Palmer disclaims any
      beneficial ownership or interest in this Trust. Cari Beck, his daughter,
      is the Trustee of the Trust and has total beneficiary rights, including
      all voting rights and investment power as the Trustee. The Trust is held
      in her name (50%) as well as that of Lindsay Helvey (25%) and Casey Helvey
      (25%), both granddaughters.





-
49 -





(4)
            There
      are no other financial instruments, including stock warrants, etc. that
      are issuable within sixty days from the filing of this
      document.




(5)
            All
      three officers spend 100% of their time managing the affairs of the
      Company.






ITEM
12.    Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions





Effective
December 1, 2001, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Carl
Palmer, the President of the Company. The agreement is for five years and
provides for a salary of $10,000 per year plus one percent of the net after tax
profits of the Company. The agreement shall be automatically renewed for
successive one-year terms unless the Company or employee provides written notice
of non-renewal.





During
November 2004, the Company entered into employment agreements with Messrs.
Parsons and Place to provide management services for the Company as Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, respectfully. As consideration for
services to be rendered, the Messrs. Parsons and Place received 480,000
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. The common shares were
distributed in equal installments commencing on December 1, 2004, 2005 and 2006.
..




As the
February 29, 2008 and 2007, the Company had received advances of $396,088 and
$299,175 from the TAM Trust in which Cari Beck, is the trustee as well as a
daughter of Carl Palmer an officer and Board member. These advances bear
interest at 10%. As of February 29, 2008, $299,175 of these advances is not
repayable until after March 1, 2011. During the fiscal year  ended
February 28, 2007, the Company decided to pay down approximately $64,000 in
notes payable from excess cash.





As of
February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, accrued interest on these advances was
approximately $221,170 and $251,800, respectively, and is included in accrued
interest due to related party in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet.





During
December 2004, the Company granted the TAM Trust restricted common stock of
1,266,667 shares for interest on prior advances of funds. The fair market value
of the restricted shares was estimated at $228,000. During April 2005, the
Company settled this liability through the issuance of common
stock.





On March
29, 2005, the Company expanded the employment agreement with Mr. Parsons to
provide management services for the Company. As consideration for services to be
rendered, the employee received 316,312 restricted shares of the Company’s
common stock.  The first third vested on the effective date of the
agreement as an enticement to enter into the agreement.  The remaining
common stock vested in equal installments on December 1, 2005 and
2006.





On March
29, 2005, the Company expanded the employment agreements with Messrs. Parsons
and Place to provide management services for the Company. As further
consideration for services to be rendered, the employees were granted 1,000,000
warrants redeemable into restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at
$.225 per share.  The first third vested on the effective date of the
agreement as an enticement to enter into the agreement.  The remaining
warrants vested in equal installments on December 1, 2005 and 2006 and are
exercisable through December 1, 2008.





On March
29, 2005, the Company granted the TAM Trust 500,000 warrants redeemable into
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at $.225 per share for
additional interest charged to the Company for previous unpaid notes and
continued financial support.  The first third vested on the effective
date of the agreement as an enticement to enter into the
agreement.  The remaining warrants vested in equal installments on
December 1, 2005 and 2006 and are exercisable through December 1,
2008





On July
27, 2005, the Company granted the TAM Trust 2,000,000 warrants redeemable on
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at $.225 per share. The warrants
are exercisable any time after December 1, 2006 and expire December 1,
2008.





On July
27, 2005, the Company expanded the employment agreements with Messrs. Parsons
and Place to provide management services for the Company. As further
consideration for services to be rendered, the employees were granted
500,000 warrants redeemable on restricted shares of the Company’s stock at $.225
per share. The warrants are exercisable any time after December 1, 2006 and
expire December 1, 2008.





On
January 23, 2006, the Company issued to the TAM Trust 37,500 common shares for
continued financial support.





On
January 23, 2006, the Company issued to the Mr. Parsons 37,500 common shares for
services rendered.





During
October 2006, the Company commenced paying a monthly stipend of $2,500 to J.
Place and D. Parsons through December 2007.





During
October 2006, the Company commenced paying a monthly monitoring fee of $5,000
payable to Pacific Financial through December 2007.





-
50 -





PART
IV





ITEM
13.   Exhibits
List




(a)
Exhibits





Exhibit No.
            Description2A*
            Plan
      of Exchange between Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc. and
      Seychelle Water Technologies, Inc. dated January 30, 1998 as filed with
      Form 10-SB 12 G on February 8, 2000.3A*
            Articles
      of Incorporation dated January 23, 1998 as filed with Form 10-SB 12 G on
      February 8, 2000.3B*
            Articles
      of Merger of Royal Net, Inc. into Seychelle Environmental Technologies,
      Inc as filed with Form 10-SB 12 G on February 8,
    2000.3C*
            Amendment
      to Articles of Incorporation re: Series "A" Preferred Stock as of January
      31, 1998 as filed with Form 10-SB 12 G on February 8,
      2000.3D*
            Amendment
      to Articles of Incorporation re: Series "AA" Preferred Stock as of June 5,
      1998 as filed with Form 10-SB 12 G on February 8,
    2000.3E*
            Amendment
      to Articles of Incorporation re: Series "AAA" Preferred Stock as of
      February 18, 1999 as filed with Form 10-SB 12 G on February 8,
      2000.3F*
            Bylaws
      as filed with Form 10-SB 12 G on February 8,
2000.10A*
            Purchase
      Agreement with Aqua Vision as filed with Form 10-SB 12 G on February 8,
      2000.10B*
            Amended
      Purchase Agreement with Aqua Vision as filed with Form 10-SB 12 G on
      February 8, 2000.10C*
            2000
      Stock Compensation Plan I, dated July 1, 2000 as filed with Registration
      Statement on Form S-8 on August 31, 2000.10D*
            2002
      Stock Compensation Plan I, dated February 12, 2002 as filed with
      Registration Statement on Form S-8 on February 27,
    2002.10E*
            Purchase
      Agreement with Aqua Gear as filed with Annual Report on Form 10-KSB on
      June 14, 2002.10F*
            Employment
      Contract with Carl Palmer as filed with Annual Report on Form 10-KSB on
      June 14, 2002.10G*
            Management
      Consulting Contract with Richard Parsons10H*
            Management
      Consulting Contract with James Place10I*
            Joint
      Venture Agreement with Huanghua Plastic Co. Ltd. dated September 1,
      200510J*
            ABMS
      Health Care Pvt. Ltd. Distribution Rights Agreement dated April 1,
      200610K*
            Confident,
      Inc. Exclusive Distribution Rights Agreement dated January 1,
      200610L*
            Continental
      Technologies. Inc., Purchase Agreement dated April 26,
      200610M*
            Promissory
      Note to TAM Irrevocable Trust dated May 1, 200110N*
            Promissory
      Note to TAM Irrevocable Trust dated February 28,
  2002








-
51 -














10O*
            Promissory
      Note to TAM Irrevocable Trust dated February 28,
  200310P*
            Promissory
      Note to TAM Irrevocable Trust dated November 1,
  200310Q*
            Promissory
      Note to TAM Irrevocable Trust dated February 28,
  200410R*
            Food
      For Health Purchase Agreement10S*
            Food
      For Health Distribution Agreement10T*
            Seychelle
      Environmental Technologies, Inc. License Agreement with Mr. Gary
      Hess31.1**
            Certification
      of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 of
      the Sarbanes Oxley Acto of 2002)31.1**
            Certification
      of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Section 302 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)32.1**
            Certification
      of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 (Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)32.2**
            Certification
      of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 (Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)23.1**
            Auditor’s
      Consent99*
            Code
      of Ethics for Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial
      Officers





___________________




* 
Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as indicated and
incorporated by reference herein





**
Attached hereto







ITEM
14.    Principal Accountant Fees
And Services




Effective
February 28, 2006, Windes & McClaughry Accountancy Corporation (Windes &
McClaughry) became our principal independent accounting firm.  All
audit work was performed by the full time employees of Windes &
McClaughry.  Our Board of Directors does not have an audit
committee.  The functions customarily delegated to an audit committee
are performed by our full Board of Directors.  Our Board of Directors
approves in advance, all services performed by Windes &
McClaughry.  Our Board of Directors has considered whether the
provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal
accountant’s independence, and has approved such
services.





The
following table sets forth fees billed by our auditors during the last two
fiscal years for services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated
financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements,
services by our auditors that are reasonably related to the performance of the
audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and that are not
reported as audit fees, services rendered in connection with tax compliance, tax
advice and tax planning, and all other fees for services rendered.





-
52 -










February
      29,
              2008
            
            
            February
      28,
              2007Audit
      fees
            
            $
            86,837
            
            
            $
            72,464Audit
      related fees
            
            
            2,632
            
            
            $
            23,161Tax
      fees
            
            
            -0-
            
            
            
            -0-All
      other fees
            
            
            -0-
            
            
            
            -0-


The audit
fees in fiscal 2007 include $72,464 of fees billed by Windes & McClaughry
related to the audit of our consolidated  financial statements for the
fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 and to the review of  our
quarterly financial statements.  Audit related fees include
$23,161 of fees billed by Windes & McClaughry for accounting services
related to the review of other SEC filings.





-
53 -











SIGNATURES





In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.




SEYCHELLE
      ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Date: May
      29, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Carl
      PalmerCarl
      Palmer
              Chief
      Executive Officer






Date:
      May 29, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Jim
      PlaceJim
      Place
              Chief Financial
      Officer











In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.




/s/ Carl
      PalmerCarl
      Palmer, Director
            
            May
      29, 2008/s/
       Jim PlaceJim
      Place, Director
            
            May
      29, 2008/s/
       Richard ParsonsRichard
      Parsons, Director
            
            May
      29, 2008





-
54 -