alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
Certifications
I, Sukhbir Singh Mudan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,2004, of Caneum, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting;
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 15, 2004
/s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan
#### Sears Roebuck & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7737.

Entry No. 3139.

(Decided September 2, 1949)

*James W. Bevans*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The question of the proper dutiable value of certain wool felt slippers and soles imported from Canada forms the subject of this appeal for a reappraisement.

The respective parties have submitted the appeal for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues herein are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *C. J. Tower*& *Sons*v. *United States,*21 Cust. Ct. 314, Reap. Dec. 7624, and that the record in that case may be incorporated herein. The parties have also agreed that the prices at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered *276for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, were the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, and that there was no-higher foreign value.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the-, values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2012184EN.01002202.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/22

---

Action brought on 23 February 2012 — ZZ v ECB

(Case F-26/12)

2012/C 184/47

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Central Bank

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the ECB decision rejecting the applicant’s requests to document access and the claim for damages.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the ECB decisions rejecting the requests to document access of the applicant, i.e. the decision dated 21 June 2011 by which the application of the applicant for access to documents has been rejected, the decision of the Director General dated 12 August 2011 and the decision of the President of the European Central Bank dated 12 December 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the ECB decisions rejecting the requests to document access of the applicant, i.e. the decision dated 21 June 2011 by which the application of the applicant for access to documents has been rejected, the decision of the Director General dated 12 August 2011 and the decision of the President of the European Central Bank dated 12 December 2011;

| — | order the ECB to pay a compensation, evaluated ex aequo et bono at EUR 10 000, for the moral prejudice suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the ECB to pay a compensation, evaluated ex aequo et bono at EUR 10 000, for the moral prejudice suffered;

| — | order the ECB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the ECB to pay the costs.

---
No. 65818.

#### Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 129963-K, 129968-K, and 129969-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Allen D. Goodman, a Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund,L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. 

Date: November 12, 2010 

By: /s/ AllenD. Goodman

Allen D. Goodman 

Managing Member (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. 

General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund,L.P.
----

**EXHIBIT 13.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Rim Mining  Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended April 30,  2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), I, F. John Norman, Chief Financial Officer of the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of the Company.

| Date: August 18, 2004 | //s// “F. John Norman”      F. John Norman       Chief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

*A signed original of this written statement required by  Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

----
No. 96-6025.

#### Woodrup *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 21.1

THE HACKETT GROUP, INC.

LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                          |  |                  
|----------------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|THE HACKETT GROUP, INC. SUBSIDIARIES      |  | JURISDICTION     
|The Hackett Group Australia Pty Limited   |  | Australia        
|REL Consultores Internacionais S/C Ltda.  |  | Brazil           
|Scott Mednick & Associates                |  | California       
|The Hackett Group Canada, Inc.            |  | Canada           
|Answerthink Consulting Group Ltd.         |  | Canada           
|triSpan, Inc.                             |  | Delaware         
|EZ Commerce Global Solutions, Inc.        |  | Delaware         
|Resource Evaluation, Inc.                 |  | Delaware         
|THINK New Ideas, Inc.                     |  | Delaware         
|Beacon Analytics, Inc.                    |  | Florida          
|CFT Consulting, Inc.                      |  | Florida          
|GCSB Acquisition Corporation              |  | Florida          
|Epic Acquisition Corporation              |  | Florida          
|Resource Evaluation SAS                   |  | France           
|The Hackett Group GmbH                    |  | Germany          
|REL Consultancy Group GmbH                |  | Germany          
|REL Consultancy Group SRL                 |  | Italy            
|Infinity Consulting Group, Inc.           |  | Indiana          
|Advis Acquisition Corporation             |  | Massachusetts    
|Legacy Technology, Inc.                   |  | Massachusetts    
|REL de Mexico, SA de CV                   |  | Mexico           
|The Hackett Group NV                      |  | Netherlands      
|Delphi Partners, Inc.                     |  | New Jersey       
|On Ramp, Inc.                             |  | New York         
|SD Goodman Group, Inc.                    |  | New York         
|The Hackett Group, Inc.                   |  | Ohio             
|Group Cortex, Inc.                        |  | Pennsylvania     
|Answerthink (India) Ltd.                  |  | Republic of India
|Answerthink Consulting India Private Ltd. |  | Republic of India
|REL Consultancy PTE Limited               |  | Singapore        
|REL Consultancy Group SL                  |  | Spain            
|The Hackett Group (Suisse) AG             |  | Switzerland      
|Hackett  REL Limited                     |  | United Kingdom   
|REL Consultancy Group Limited             |  | United Kingdom   
|Resource Evaluation Limited               |  | United Kingdom   
|The Hackett Group Limited                 |  | United Kingdom
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7772

ROBERT LEWIS PRICE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

G. L. WOODARD,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 97-7868

ROBERT LEWIS PRICE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

G. L. WOODARD,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-97-134-5-H)
2

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 30, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lewis Price, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997) (No. 97-7772). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal in No. 97-7772

on the reasoning of the district court. Price v. Woodard, No. CA97-134-5-H (E.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 1997).

Appellant also appeals the district court's denial of a

certificate of appealability (No. 97-7868). Finding no substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right, we further deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal in No. 97-7868

on the reasoning of the district court. Price v. Woodard, No. CA97-134-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2014395EN.01003801.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2014 — Euro-Link Consultants and European Profiles v Commission

(Case T-199/12) (1)

((Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Crimean tourism diversification and support project - Rejection of the applicants’ tender - Action for annulment - Measure not amenable to review - Confirmatory measure - Partial inadmissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Award criteria - Manifest error of assessment - Misuse of powers - Equal treatment))

(2014/C 395/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Euro-Link Consultants Srl (Bucharest, Romania); and European Profiles AE Meleton kai Symvoulon Epicheiriseon (Athens, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: S. Bartelt and A. Bordes, and subsequently by S. Bartelt and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision of 28 February 2012 of the European Union Delegation to Ukraine, in the restricted tender procedure EuropeAid/131567/C/SER/UA ‘Crimean tourism diversification and support project’, not to award the contract to the applicants’ consortium, and the subsequent decisions rejecting the applicants’ complaints made on 14 March 2012 by that authority and on 2 May 2012 by the Director of the Neighbourhood Directorate of the Commission’s Directorate General for Development and Co-operation — EuropeAid

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Euro-Link Consultants Srl and European Profiles AE Meleton kai Symvoulon Epicheiriseon to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Euro-Link Consultants Srl and European Profiles AE Meleton kai Symvoulon Epicheiriseon to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW138450] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Kennedy Oil for competitive oil and gas lease WYW138450 for land in Johnson County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW138450 effective March 1, 2006, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited                           ( print page 28069)                        above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Pamela J. Lewis, 

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

 [FR Doc. E7-9598 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
Case No. 8,697.

#### McCLEOD v. GLOYD.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 264.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Oct. Term, 1821.

Clerk of Court — Mistake—Failure to Enter Appearance — Case Dismissed — Affidavit —Reinstatement.

The court will permit an action of replevin which has been discontinued at a former term, by reason of the non-appearance of the defendant, to be re-instated, and the continuances entered up, upon afiidavit, that the defendant’s counsel, or attorney, on a day during the term, directed the clerk to enter his appearance, and that the clerk neglected to make the entry on the docket.

[Cited in Reiling v. Bolier, Case No. 11,671.]

[This was an action at law by John Me-. Cleod against George H. Gloyd.]

Replevin, returnable to June term, 1820. Discontinued by the non-appearance of the defendant.

Mr. Ashton, for defendant,

upon affidavits of himself and Gloyd, stating, that at June term, 1820, he had directed the clerk, or his deputy, then having charge of the docket, in court, to enter his appearance for the defendant, and that he promised to do so, but neglected it, moved THE COURT to reinstate the cause, and to direct the continuances to be granted up. Granted.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Audit and Financial Management Advisory (AFMAC) Committee Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Appendix 2 of title 
5, United States Code, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that 
the U.S. Small Business Administration, Audit and Financial Management 
Advisory Committee (AFMAC) will host a federal public meeting on 
Wednesday, May 23, 2007 at 8 a.m. The meeting will take place at the 
U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Office of the 
Chief Financial Officer Conference Room, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 
20416. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the SBA's FY 2006 
audit remediation, FY 2007 Financial Reporting, FY 2007 Credit Subsidy 
Modeling, A-123 Internal Control Program, Fraud Detection and 
Prevention Measures, Information System Security, Performance 
Management Framework, FY 2007 PAR Content and Production and FY 2007 
Financial Audit.
    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Jennifer Main in writing or 
by fax. Jennifer Main, Chief Financial Officer, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
6th Floor, Washington, DC 20416, phone: (202) 205-6449, fax: (202) 205-
6969, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#48022d2626212e2d3a6625292126083b2a29662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c16393232353a392e72313d35321c2f3e3d723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>.

Matthew Teague,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-9416 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION









<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of 30DC,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending  December 31, 2010, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Theodore A. Greenberg,
Principal  Accounting  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: September 19, 2011

/s/ Theodore A. Greenberg
--------------------------------------------------------
Theodore A. Greenberg
Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.