alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# ELRS Airmen open new Desert Depot

By Tech. Sgt. Christopher Hubenthal379th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs

                AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

379th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron379th Expeditionary Civil Engineer Squadronmateriel managementbootsoffice supplies
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14

- 1645 Filed May 25, 2016

SHAIN MATTHEW MALLOY , Applicant

- Appellant,

vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent

- Appellee.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Duane E. Hoffmeyer , Judge.

A n applicant appeals the court’s summary dismissal of his postconviction relief application s

. AFFIRMED

.

Rees Conrad Douglas , Sioux City , for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick , Assistant Attorney General , for appellee State.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Doyle and Bower, JJ.2

VOGEL, Presiding Judge. Shain Malloy appeals the district court’s summary dismissal of his applications for postconviction relief (PCR). In 1995 Malloy was convicted of extortion following a guilty plea and convicted of burglary following a jury trial. He was also convicted of inter ference with official acts following a guilty plea in January 2004. In June 2009, Malloy was sentenced in federal court as a “career offender” for participating in a conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine. Malloy’s convictions in 1995 and 2004 were fo und to be “crimes of violence , ” resulting in an enhanced sentence for the 2009 conviction under the federal guidelines. See United States v. Malloy , 614 F.3d 852, 860 (8th Cir. 2010). In this proceeding, Malloy claimed his attorneys in the 1995 and 200 4 proceedings were ineffective for failing to advise him prior to his guilty pleas of the possible collateral consequence of a future enhanced federal sentence. In addition, with respect to the burglary conviction, Malloy claimed newly discovered evidence of the victim’s recantation justifies a new trial. The PCR court rejected these claims, finding they were time barred by the three

- year statute of limitations for PCR proceedings. See Iowa Code § 822.3 (2013). Specifically, the court concluded, with re spect to the first claim, no exception to the three

- year bar is applicable because the law has not changed with respect to counsel’s duty to inform a defendant of the effect of a conviction on future convictions. See State v. Christensen , 201 N.W.2d 457, 459 (Iowa 1972) (noting counsel has no such duty to warn a defendant of the effect a conviction has on future convictions). In addition, the court rejected Malloy’s second claim , finding the “newly discovered evidence” Malloy offered was “merely cumulativ e and impeaching of the victim’s3

credibility and [was] not likely to result in a different outcome on retrial.” See Adcock v. State , 528 N.W.2d 645, 647 (Iowa Ct. App. 1994) (outlining what a PCR applicant must prove to prevail on a claim of newly discove red evidence and noting “[a] witness’s recantation testimony is looked upon with the utmost suspicion”). On appeal, Malloy raises these claims again. Upon our review for correction of errors at law, see Lopez

- Penaloza v. State , 804 N.W.2d 537, 540 (Iow a Ct. App. 2011), we agree with the decision of the district court and affirm its dismissal of Malloy’s PCR applications without further opinion pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(d) and (e).
AFFIRMED.
Before the First Division,

December 7, 1949

No. 53777.

protest 145723-K (Detroit).

#### Winthrop-Stearns, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
### Wells and water levels in principal ground-water basins in Santa Barbara County, California

By: G. A. La RocqueJ. E. UpsonG. F. WortsL. Porter

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1068

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Pages:                               - **Part 1-Carpinteria-Goleta basins**                            (html)
  - **Part 1-Santa Ynez and San Antonio basins**                            (html)
  - **Part 2-Cuyama Valley**                            (html)
  - **Part 2-Santa Maria Valley**                            (html) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# C_2013046EN.01003202.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/32

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 November 2012 — Ciora v Commission

(Case F-50/12)

(Civil Service - Notice of competition EPSO/AD/198/10 - Non-admission to the competition - Action - Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 46/64

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cătălin Ion Ciora (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: M. Bondoc, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil Service — Action for annulment of the decision of the selection board for competition EPSO/AD/198/10 Heads of unit with Romanian citizenship (AD9) not to accept the applicant’s application.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;

| 2. | Mr Ciora is to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Ciora is to bear his own costs.

---
Exhibit No. 32.2

Form 10-QSB

The Quantum Group, Inc.

File No. 000-31727

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date  March 21, 2006

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| |     | /s/ DONALDB. COHEN     
| | By: | Donald B. Cohen        
| |     | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Quantum Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Quantum Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(Reap. Dec. 9053)

#### United States *v.*Daniel F. Young, Inc., a/c Raylite Trading Co., Inc.

Entry No. 75155.

(Decided January 23, 1958)

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain electric bulbs exported from Japan and entered at the port of New York.

The merchandise in question is identified in the written stipulation of submission as follows:

> 200,000 pieces

> C-6 X’mas tree light lamps, tungsten filament,

> 15 volt, miniature base. Assorted colors.

The agreed set of facts upon which the case is before me established export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, and that such statutory value for the articles is $7.50 per 1,000 pieces, less charges deducted on entry, and I so hold. Judgment will he rendered accordingly.
No. 47035.

#### Protest 826853-G of Humphrey & MacGregor (Tampa).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiffs. As there was nothing in'the record to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s decision, the-protest was overruled.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
19th day of June 2003.


/s/ Alex Stelmak
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We have issued our reports datedMarch 16, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Mannatech, Incorporated and subsidiaries onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Mannatech, Incorporated and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-72767, effectiveFebruary 22, 1999; File No. 333-77227, effective April 28, 1999; File No. 333-94519, effective January 12, 2000; File No. 333-47752, effective October 11, 2000; and File No. 333-113975, effectiveMarch 26, 2004). 

 

 

Grant Thornton LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

March 16, 2007
No. 49498.

#### Protests 801988-G, etc., of Aoki Taiseido Book Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the books in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Aoki Taiseido*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 217, C. D. 757). In accordance therewith the protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 55584.

#### Schenley Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 119365-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41510

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BENANCIO ALANIS-ZUNIGA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-481-ALL

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Benancio Alanis-Zuniga (Alanis-Zuniga) appeals his guilty

plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following

deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The Government does

not seek enforcement of Alanis-Zuniga’s waiver of appeal;

therefore, this court will not enforce it. See United States v.

Rhodes, 253 F.3d 800, 804 (5th Cir. 2001). 

For the first time on appeal, Alanis-Zuniga contends that

the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. 
No. 04-41510

-2-

§ 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and Shepard v. United States, 125 S.

Ct. 1254 (2005). However, as Alanis-Zuniga concedes, this

argument is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 247 (1998); United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979,

984 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# The pressure is on during hose testing at DSCC

By Craig M. RaderDLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
                The pressure is on during hose testing at DSCC                            Firefighter and Emergency Medical Technician Dustin Buckley rolls out water hoses during routine pressure testing June 4 at the Defense Supply Center Columbus. Each year, all hoses and attachments are tested to ensure they meet federal codes and guidelines.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Michael RowlandVIRIN: 180604-D-RE244-090 Firefighter and Emergency Medical Technician Dustin Buckley rolls out water hoses during routine pressure testing June 4 at the Defense Supply Center Columbus. Each year, all hoses and attachments are tested to ensure they meet federal codes and guidelines.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MSafety L&MFire & EMS L&MFirefighterhose testingSecurity L&M
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Form 10-K Annual Report
(the Report) for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code.

David H. Clarke, the Chief Executive Officer and
Jeffery B. Park, the Chief Financial Officer of Jacuzzi Brands,
Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| |    |                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | a. | the Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc.

Date: December 19, 2003

/s/ DAVID H. CLARKE




Name: David H. Clarke


Chief Executive Officer


/s/ JEFFREY B. PARK




Name: Jeffrey B. Park


Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Swan River National WildlifeRefuge, public use opportunities**
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.44/2: SW 2/4/
Item Number:0612-C (online)
CGP systemNumber:001083577
 
2013 | 2020 | 2022
 
October 30, 2018
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 24

- 0018 6- CR

J ESUS R AMIREZROSALES

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 396th District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1799933 )

August 1, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
(Reap. Dec. 9471)

#### The American Import Company R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 858627.

(Decided June 18, 1959)

*Stein & Shostak (Marjorie M. Shostak*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Oochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General *(Murray Sklaroff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> Miss Shostak: * * *

> In this case the plaintiff offers to stipulate that at the time of exportation of this merchandise to the United States the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of *685the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities, and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced and entered values ex-factory, and that there were no higher prices at which such or similar merchandise was being offered for sale or sold for home consumption in the country of exportation at the time of exportation involved herein.

> Mb. 'Skxaboipf : May it please the court, I have discussed this matter with Examiner Eerguson. The information obtained by Examiner Ferguson indicates this to be the fact and the Government so stipulates.

On tlie agreed facts, I find the export valne, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoiced and entered values, ex-factory in each case.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.