FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT D e c e m be r 21, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 12425 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 4 - 0 0 1 9 8 - CR- CB U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s O L U Y O M I O S H I N A I K E , a .k .a . A b d u l, D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e So u th e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( D e c e m b e r 21, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , H U L L an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: O l uy om i O s hi na i ke appe a l s hi s s e nt e nc e of 41 m onths of

i m pr i s onm e ntf

or2

hi s c onvi c t i ons on tw o c ount s of e xe c ut i ng a nd a tt e m pt i ng t o e xe c ut e ba nk f r a ud, 18 U . S . C . §§ 1344 a nd 2. O s hi na i ke a r gue s tha thi s s e nt e nc e w a s unr e a s onabl e a nd tha tthe di s tr i c tc our tvi ol a t e d the S i xth A m e ndm e ntw he n i tm a de f a c tua l f i ndi ngs to e n h a n c e O s h in a ik e ’s g u id e lin e r a n g e . W e a f f irm . W e r evi ew a s ent ence for r ea sonabl enes s i n the l i gh tof the fa ct ors del i neat ed in s e c tio n 3 5 5 3 ( a ) . U n ite d S ta te s v . M a r tin , 4 5 5 F .3 d 1 2 2 7 , 1 2 3 7 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) .

“ [ W ] he n the di s tr i c tc our ti m pos e s a s e nt e nc e w i thi n the a dvi s ory S e nt e nc i ng G ui del i nes r ange, w e ordi nari l y w i l l expectthatchoi ce t o b e are as on abl e one. ” U ni t e d S t a t e s v. T a l l e y , 431 F . 3d 784, 788 ( 11th C i r . 2005) . W e r e vi e w the appl i ca t i on of the se nt enci ng gu i del i nes by the di stri ctcourtde no vo and revi ew f i ndi ngs of

f a c tf orc l e a re rr or . U ni t e d S t a t e s v. C r a w f or d, 407 F . 3d 1174, 1177- 78 (11th C i r. 20 05 ). O shi nai ke fi rs tar gu es thatthe di stri cti m po se d an u nrea sonabl e s ent ence because the di stri ctcourtdi d n otconsi der a l l the re l evantse ct i on 35 53 (a ) f ac t ors b e f o r e im p o s in g a s e n te n c e , tr e a te d th e g u id e lin e r a n g e a s p r e s u m p tiv e ly appr opr i a t e , i m pos e d as e nt e nc e gr e a t e rtha n ne c e s s a ryi n the l i ghtof the s e c t i on 3553( a ) f a c t or s , a nd f

a i l e d t o pr ovi de a n a de qua t e e xpl a na t i on of i t s r e a s ons f

or i m pos i ng the s e nt e nc e . T he s e a r gum e nt s f a i l . A r e vi e w of

the s e nt e nc i ng tra nscr i ptre veal s thatthe di stri ctcourtconsi dere d the ar gu m ent s of O shi nai ke for a3

no n-gu i del i ne se nt ence and the re l evantse ct i on 35 53 (a ) f ac t ors w hen i tconcl ud ed tha tas e nt e nc e a tthe l ow - e nd of the gui de l i ne r a nge w a s appr opr i a t e . A l though the di stri ctcourtw as no tre qu i re d t o d i sc uss e ac h fac t or or st at e on the re cord that i thad con si dere d eac h fac t or, T al l ey , 43 1 F . 3d at78 6, the di stri ctcourtexpl ai ned thati tconsi dere d the se nt ence approp ri at e bas ed on the se ri ou snes s of the offens e, O s h in a ik e ’s r o le in th e o f f e n s e , a n d O s h in a ik e ’s f

a ilu r e to a c c e p t r e s p o n s ib ility be f or e tr i a l . T he di s tr i c tc our ta l s o r e j e c t e d the r e c om m e nda t i on of the gove rnm e nt to s e n te n c e O s h in a ik e a t th e h ig h - e n d o f th e g u id e lin e r a n g e . O s h in a ik e a r g u e s s e c o n d th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t e rr e d w h e n it e n h a n c e d h is s e nt e nc e ba s e d on f

a c t s tha tw e r e nota dm i tt e d by O s hi na i ke , f ound by a j ury , or p r o v e d b e y o n d a r e a s o n ab le d o u b t. T h is a r g u m e n t is f o r e c lo s e d b y o u rp r e c e d e n t. W hen the se nt enci ng gu i del i nes a re appl i ed i n an adv i soryfa shi on , the di stri ct co u rtd o es n o terr w h en i tu ses ex tra-v erd i cten h an cem en t s, fo u n d b y a prepon dera nce of the evi dence, t o cal cul at e adefe nd ant ’ s s ent ence . U ni t ed S t at es v. C ha u, 426 F . 3d 1318, 1323 ( 11th C i r . 2005) ; U ni t e d S t a t e s v. R odr i gue z , 393 F .3 d 1 2 9 1 , 1 2 9 6 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . O sh i n ai k e’ s sen t en ce i s AF F I RME D.