alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.8


 


CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT


 


THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”)
is entered into on May 31, 2007, between Fused Industries, LLC, a Colorado
LLC (“Consultant”) and Fairground Media, LLC. (“Client”), with its principal place
of business located at 875 Dellwood Avenue, Boulder,
Colorado, 80304 and shall be effective as of May 31, 2007 (the “Effective
Date”).


 


WHEREAS, Consultant is
engaged in the business of writing computer code for the purposes of creating a
transactional web site.


 


WHEREAS, Client wishes to
utilize the services of Consultant in connection with the software development
of the CrowdFunder.com web site.  NOW, THEREFORE, Consultant and Client agree
as follows:


 


1.0       Project
Background

Fairground Media LLC. Is developing a web
service call CrowdFunder.com.  Crowdfunder.com
(Crowdfunder) is an Internet website property that
provides a robust and entertaining way for sellers of user-created-content (“Sellers”)
to market and sell their intellectual property (“IP”) to a community of buyers
(“Buyers”).  Fairground Media intends to
secure equity financing to develop the CrowdFunder.com
service.  Consultant will consult on this
project as defined in this agreement.


 


2.0       Scope

The work Consultant is to perform is limited to the following scope.

2.1.1 Consult with Fairground Media to develop and build the Crowdfunder.com web site described in the Crowdfunder business plan.

2.1.2 Act as Project Manager and assume a leadership role in the day-to-day
development and marketing affairs of Crowdfunder.


 


3.0       Project
Deliverables — All deliverables shall be determined by Mark
H. Kreloff and Andrew V. Brandt.


 


4.0       Contract Payment —  Fairground
Media, Inc. agrees to pay Consultant at the rate of $7,000 per month for
six months.  Consultant agrees to provide
invoices for services beginning July 10, 2007.


 


5.0       Supporting
Documentation

Supporting documentation will be amended to this agreement on an as needed
basis


 


            IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first set
forth above.


 


	
  Consultant Consultant

  	
   

  	
  Client Fairground
  Media, LLC.

  
	
  By:  

  	
  /s/ Luke
  Miller        

  	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ Mark Kreloff        
    

  
	
  Title: Owner

  	
   

  	
  Title: President/CEO
# C_2014142EN.01003302.xml

| 12.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 March 2014 — Still v OHIM (Fleet Data Services)

(Joined Cases T-534/12 and T-535/12) (1)

1

((Community Trade Mark - Applications for registration of the Community figurative marks Fleet Data Services and Truck Data Services - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Absence of any distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - The right to be heard - Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009))

2014/C 142/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Still GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: S. Waller, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Two actions brought against two decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 September 2012 (Case R 130/2012-1 and Case R 4/2012-1), concerning applications for registration, first, of the figurative sign Fleet Data Services and, secondly, the figurative sign Truck Data Services as Community trade marks.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders Still GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Still GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.

1

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John B. Zumwalt, III,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

May 9, 2003                                        By:  /s/ John B. Zumwalt, III
                                                        ------------------------

                                                            John B. Zumwalt, III
                                                            Vice Chairman,
                                                            President and Chief
                                                            Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-61,260] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 6, 2007 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Bayer Clothing Group, Target Sales Corp., Frisco, Texas. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification, (TA-W-59,299C as amended) which expires on May 31, 2008. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of May 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E7-9474 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 96-7550.

#### Williams *v.*Cain, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, James A. Rotherham, C.P.A., Chief Financial Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Dated: March 16, 2005



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James A. Rotherham, C.P.A.                                                  
|James A. Rotherham, C.P.A. Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
19th day of June 2003.


/s/ Alex Stelmak
-------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1792 

To clarify the authority of the United States Marshal Service to assist 

other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies in the investigation of cases involving sex offenders and missing children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2011 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify the authority of the United States Marshal Service 

to assist other Federal, State, and local law enforcement 

agencies in the investigation of cases involving sex offenders and missing children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Inves5 tigations of Sex Offenders and Missing Children Act of 

6 2011’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1792 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY. 

2 Section 566(e)(1)(B) of title 28, United States Code, 

3 is amended to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(B) as directed by the Attorney General, 

5 investigate— 

6 ‘‘(i) fugitive matters, both within and 

7 outside the United States; and 

8 ‘‘(ii) at the request of another Fed9 eral, State, or local law enforcement agen10 cy, cases involving— 

11 ‘‘(I) a sex offender (as defined in 

12 section 111 of the Sex Offender Reg13 istration and Notification Act (42 

14 U.S.C. 16911)) who violates a sex of15 fender registration requirement; or 

16 ‘‘(II) a missing child.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
          I, Edward A. Keible, Jr., certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Endwave Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report on Form 10-Q/A does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q/A.        Date: August 4, 2004 /s/    EDWARD A. KEIBLE, JR.   Edward A. Keible, Jr.   President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Ileana Almodovar et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Defendant, Joseph Cambria, Appellant, and Robert Almodovar et al., Respondents.

[698 NYS2d 489]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered March 26, 1998, which, upon the grant of the motion of plaintiffs and the cross motion of defendants Robert Almodovar and Griselle Maldonado for renewal, denied defendant Joseph Cambria’s previously granted motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Renewal of the motion for summary judgment was properly granted based on the renewal movants’ submission of additional evidence not before the court on the original motion (see, *Framapac Delicatessen v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*249 AD2d 36). As to the merits of the summary judgment motion, we agree with the motion court that the affidavit of defendant Robert Almodovar, freshly before the court on renewal, was sufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether plaintiff Edwin Almodovar’s injuries were caused by the vehicle driven by defendant Cambria. To the extent that defendant Robert Almodovar’s prior statement to the police is inconsistent with his recent affidavit, such inconsistency suffices only to raise questions as to his credibility which are not appropriately resolved on a motion for summary judgment. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.
No. 47682.

#### Protest 972366-G of Gellman Bros. (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was agreed at the hearing that the tin kazoo pipes, and tin kazoo whistles in question are similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 44122. They were therefore held dutiable at 45 percent, under paragraph 397, as claimed.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In re State of Texas

No. 06

- 21

- 00127

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss

, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating

.

As state d in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, we deny the petition as moot

.

RENDERED OCTOBER 20, 2021 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
# C_2012151EN.01003002.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/30

---

Action brought on 22 February 2012 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

(Case T-99/12)

2012/C 151/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) (Damas, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | In consequence, annul Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 and Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 and their subsequent implementing acts, insofar as they concern the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

In consequence, annul Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 and Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 and their subsequent implementing acts, insofar as they concern the applicant;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, the first three of which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Cases T-432/11 Makhlouf v Council, (1) and T-433/11 Makhlouf v Council.
   (2)

Makhlouf

Council

1

Makhlouf

Council.

2

The fourth plea alleges infringement of the principle of equal treatment, the consequence of which is to distort competition both within the European Union and Syria and as between those two territories.

---

(1)  OJ 2011 C 290, p. 13.

1

(2)  OJ 2011 C 290, p. 14

2

---
# C_2013026EN.01007301.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/73

---

Action brought on 29 October 2012 — ZZ v Parliament

(Case F-128/12)

2013/C 26/150

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision to recover, pursuant to Article 85(2) of the Staff Regulations, all of the dependent child allowance wrongly received by the applicant and not only the allowance that the applicant wrongly received during the past five years.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority of 9 December 2011 in so far as it seeks, pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 85(2) of the Staff Regulations, to recover the full amount wrongly received since September 1999 and not only the amount wrongly received during the past five years on the ground that the appointing authority found that the applicant had deliberately misled the administration; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority of 9 December 2011 in so far as it seeks, pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 85(2) of the Staff Regulations, to recover the full amount wrongly received since September 1999 and not only the amount wrongly received during the past five years on the ground that the appointing authority found that the applicant had deliberately misled the administration;

| — | where necessary, annul the decision rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

where necessary, annul the decision rejecting the complaint;

| — | order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to pay the costs.

---
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-41962) pertaining to the StarMedia Network, Inc. 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-79255) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option
Plan, 1998 Stock Option Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of StarMedia
Network, Inc. of our report dated June 21, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of StarMedia Network, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

          NEW YORK, NEW YORK
          JULY 8, 2002
# C_2014102EN.01003401.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Lídl Music (LIDL express)

(Case T-225/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark LIDL express - Earlier national figurative mark LÍDL MUSIC - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 15(1) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2014/C 102/53

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: initially by M. Schaeffer, M. Wolter and A. Marx, and subsequently by M. Wolter, A. Marx and M. Kefferpütz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Lídl Music spol. s r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 March 2012 (Case R 2379/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Lídl Music spol. s r.o. and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                         TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Paradigm Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form
10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

      Dated: March 27, 2003           /s/ Heinrich Gugger
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

      Dated: March 27, 2003           /s/ Philip R. Alfano
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Vice President, Finance,
                                      Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.