### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 6 0 8 7 2 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

P A U L A B R A D S H A W
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l a n t

v

.

C I T Y O F G U L F P O R T
, M I S S I S S I P P I ; J I M C O W A N
, i n h i s o f f i c i a l a n d p e r s o n a l

c a p a c i t i e s ,

D e f e n d a n t s

- A p p e l l e e s

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f M i s s i s s i p p i U S D C N o

. 1 : 0 9

- C V

- 7 4 3

B e f o r e J O N E S
, C h i e f J u d g e , a n d J O L L Y a n d S O U T H W I C K
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

P a u l a B r a d s h a w f

i l e d s u i t a g a i n s t t h e C i t y o f G u l f p o r t , M i s s i s s i p p i
, f

o r

a l l e g e d v i o l a t i o n s o f T i t l e V I I o f t h e C i v i l R i g h t s A c t o f 1 9 6 4
, 4 2 U

. S

. C

. § § 2 0 0 0 e ,

e t s e q

. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d i s m i s s e d t h e f e d e r a l c l a i m s a s t i m e

- b a r r e d s i n c e
B r a d s h a w f a i l e d t o f

i l e w i t h i n 9 0 d a y s o f r e c e i v i n g h e r “ r i g h t t o s u e ” l e t t e r f r o m

t h e E q u a l E m p l o y m e n t O p p o r t u n i t y C o m m i s s i o n ( “ E E O C ” )

. W e A F F I R M

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 7, 201 1

Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5
, the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-60872 Document: 00511500709 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2011N o

. 1 0

- 6 0 8 7 2

P a u l a B r a d s h a w i s a f o r m e r e m p l o y e e o f t h e C i t y o f G u l f p o r t

. I n
D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 8
, B r a d s h a w f i l e d w i t h t h e E E O C a c h a r g e o f e m p l o y m e n t

d i s c r i m i n a t i o n a g a i n s t t h e C i t y a f t e r s h e a l l e g e d l y f

o u n d a h a n g m a n ’ s n o o s e
h a n g i n g i n h e r o f

f i c e i n M a r c h o f t h a t y e a r

. T h e E E O C d i s m i s s e d t h e c h a r g e a s

u n t i m e l y a n d i s s u e d a r i g h t t o s u e l e t t e r o n D e c e m b e r 1 6
, 2 0 0 8

. B r a d s h a w

a l l e g e d t h a t i n r e t a l i a t i o n f o r h e r f

i l i n g t h i s f

i r s t c o m p l a i n t , t h e C i t y

s u b s e q u e n t l y f

i r e d h e r o n J a n u a r y 2 1
, 2 0 0 9

. A s a r e s u l t , B r a d s h a w f i l e d a

s e c o n d c h a r g e w i t h t h e E E O C o n F e b r u a r y 1 2
, a n d c o n t e m p o r a n e o u s l y a p p e a l e d

h e r t e r m i n a t i o n t o t h e C i t y ’ s C i v i l S e r v i c e C o m m i s s i o n ( “ C S C ” )

. O n J u n e 1 6
, 2 0 0 9

– b e f

o r e t h e C S C c o m p l e t e d i t s r e v i e w o f B r a d s h a w ’ s a p p e a l

– t h e E E O C

i s s u e d a r i g h t t o s u e l e t t e r , w h i c h i n f o r m e d B r a d s h a w t h a t s h e h a d 9 0 d a y s f r o m

t h e r e c e i p t o f t h e l e t t e r t o b r i n g a c i v i l a c t i o n

. B r a d s h a w f i l e d s u i t o n O c t o b e r

2 8
, 2 0 0 9

. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d i s m i s s e d t h e T i t l e V I I a l l e g a t i o n s o f t h e s u i t a s

t i m e

- b a r r e d

. B r a d s h a w n o w a p p e a l s

. 1

W e r e v i e w r u l i n g s o n m o t i o n s f o r s u m m a r y j u d g m e n t d e n o v o , a p p l y i n g

t h e s a m e s t a n d a r d a s t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t

. K i n g v

. I l l

. C e n t

. R

. R

. , 3 3 7 F

. 3 d 5 5 0
, 5 5 3
( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 3 )

. A c o u r t m a y o n l y g r a n t s u m m a r y j u d g m e n t i f t h e r e i s n o

g e n u i n e i s s u e o f m a t e r i a l f a c t , s u c h t h a t t h e m o v i n g p a r t y i s e n t i t l e d t o j u d g m e n t a s a m a t t e r o f l a w

. F E D

. R

. C I V

. P

. 5 6 ( a )

. T i t l e V I I p r o h i b i t s r e t a l i a t i o n b y e m p l o y e r s a g a i n s t e m p l o y e e s w h o h a v e
f i l e d a c h a r g e o f

d i s c r i m i n a t i o n

. B r

y a n t v

. C o m p a s s G r o u p U S A

, I n c

. , 4 1 3 F

. 3 d

4 7 1
, 4 7 5 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 5 ) ( c i t i n g 4 2 U

. S

. C

. § 2 0 0 0 e

- 3 ( a ) )

. A n e m p l o y m e n t

d i s c r i m i n a t i o n p l a i n t i f f m a y n o t , h o w e v e r , b r i n g s u i t u n l e s s h e t i m e l y f i l e s a

c h a r g e o f d i s c r i m i n a t i o n w i t h t h e E E O C

. T a y l o r v

. B o o k s A M i l l i o n , I n c

. , 2 9 6

F

. 3 d 3 7 6
, 3 7 9 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 2 )

. O n c e t h e E E O C i s s u e s a s t a t u t o r y n o t i c e o f r i g h t

t o s u e , a p l a i n t i f

f h a s 9 0 d a y s t o f

i l e s u i t

. B e r r

y v

. C I G N

A / R S I

- C I G N

A
, 9 7 5 F

. 2 d

The cour t als o dis mi ss ed her clai ms agains t app ellant Cow an wi th pr ejudi ce and her 1
st ate law c laim s wi thou t pr ejudi ce. Thes e r ulings ar e n ot app ealed

.

2 Case: 10-60872 Document: 00511500709 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2011N o

. 1 0

- 6 0 8 7 2

1 1 8 8
, 1 1 9 1 ( 5 t h C i r

. 1 9 9 2 )

. I m p o r t a n t l y , t h e r e q u i r e m e n t t o f i l e a l a w s u i t w i t h i n

t h e 9 0

- d a y l i m i t a t i o n p e r i o d i s n o t j u r i s d i c t i o n a l
, b u t r a t h e r a s t a t u t o r y

p r e c o n d i t i o n t o f

i l i n g s u i t

. T

a y l o r , 2 9 6 F

. 3 d a t 3 7 9

- 8 0

. A s a r e s u l t , i t i s s u b j e c t

t o d o c t r i n e s s u c h a s e q u i t a b l e t o l l i n g

. M a n n i n g v

. C h e v r o n C h e m

. C o

. , 3 3 2 F

. 3 d

8 7 4
, 8 8 0 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 3 )

. O n a p p e a l
, B r a d s h a w a r g u e s t h a t t h e l i m i t a t i o n s p e r i o d f o r h e r c l a i m w a s

e q u i t a b l y t o l l e d

. S h e d o e s n o t , h o w e v e r , c l a i m t h a t a n y o f t h e r e c o g n i z e d b a s e s
f o r e q u i t a b l e t o l l i n g i n T i t l e V I I c a s e s a r e a p p l i c a b l e i n h e r c a s e

. R a t h e r , 2

B r a d s h a w c i t e s a r a f t o f r e g u l a t i o n s n o t r a i s e d b e f o r e t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t t o

s u p p o r t h e r t h e o r y t h a t t h e l i m i t a t i o n s p e r i o d s h o u l d h a v e b e e n e q u i t a b l y t o l l e d

u n t i l t h e C S C c o m p l e t e d i t s r e v i e w o f h e r c a s e

. S i n c e B r a d s h a w f a i l e d t o p r e s e n t

t h i s t h e o r y b e f

o r e t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t , i t i s n o t o u r p l a c e t o c o n s i d e r i t f o r t h e f i r s t

t i m e o n a p p e a l

. S e e G u i l l o r y v

. P P G I

n d u s

. , I n c

. , 4 3 4 F

. 3 d 3 0 3
, 3 1 3 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 5 )

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t p r o p e r l y c o n c l u d e d t h a t B r a d s h a w ’ s s u i t ,

w h i c h w a s f

i l e d o n O c t o b e r 2 8
, 2 0 0 9
, w a s u n t i m e l y

. T h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s
A F F I R M E D

.

The Fift h Circ uit rec ognizes thr ee pot enti al ba s e s for equit ably tol ling the 90-d ay 2 lim itat ions p erio d: ( 1) t he pend ency of a s uit betw een the sam e p art ies in t he wr ong f orum ; (2) the plai ntif

f' s lack of aw aren es s of the fac ts sup por ting his clai m beca use of the def enda nt' s inte ntio nal conc ealm ent of them ; and (3) the EEOC' s mi sle adin g the plai ntif f about his right s. Ma nning v. Che vr on Chem

. Co.
, 332 F.3d 874
, 880 (5t h Cir

. 2003)

.
3 Case: 10-60872 Document: 00511500709 Page: 3 Date Filed: 06/07/2011