alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1815 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1815

 To codify and delay the implementation of and compliance dates for a 
     final rule relating to interstate transport of air pollution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 7, 2011

  Mr. Alexander (for himself and Mr. Pryor) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To codify and delay the implementation of and compliance dates for a 
     final rule relating to interstate transport of air pollution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cross State Air Pollution Act''.

SEC. 2. INTERSTATE AIR POLLUTION.

    (a) Codification.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
subject to subsection (b), the final rule entitled ``Federal 
Implementation Plans: Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter 
and Ozone and Correction of SIP Approvals'' (76 Fed. Reg. 48208 (August 
8, 2011)), is enacted into law.
    (b) Effective Dates.--The effective date of the final rule enacted 
by subsection (a) (or any update by the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency of a requirement or standard 
established under that final rule) shall be--
            (1) for phase I sulfur dioxide and annual nitrogen oxide 
        reductions, January 1, 2012;
            (2) for ozone season nitrogen oxide reductions, May 1, 
        2012; and
            (3) for phase II sulfur dioxide reductions, January 1, 
        2015.
    (c) Compliance Dates.--The date by which compliance shall be 
required under the final rule, or an update, referred to in subsection 
(b) shall be--
            (1) for requirements described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of 
        subsection (b), April 1, 2014, and annually thereafter; and
            (2) for requirements described in subsection (b)(3), April 
        1, 2016, and annually thereafter.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2013046EN.01003201.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/32

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 3 December 2012 — BT v Commission

(Case F-45/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Contract staff - Non-renewal of the contract - Insufficient grounds stated for the action - Action manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 46/63

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BT (Bucharest, Romania)) (represented by: N. Visan, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | BT must bear her own costs and is ordered pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

BT must bear her own costs and is ordered pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 7.7.2012, p. 21.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5141-N-02]


Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee; Advanced Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing 
Commissioner, HUD.
SUMMARY: This notice invites interested persons to submit 
recommendations related to proposed changes to the Federal Manufactured 
Construction and Safety Standards and Manufactured Home Procedural and 
Enforcement Regulations. The recommendations are to be submitted to the 
Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee (Consensus Committee) for 
review, and consideration for providing periodic recommendations to the 
Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development to adopt, 
revise, and interpret the Federal manufactured housing construction 
standards and proposed procedural and enforcement regulations.

ADDRESSES: Proposed changes should be mailed to: The National Fire 
Protection Association, One Batterymarch Park, P.O. Box 9101, Quincy, 
Massachusetts 02269, Attention: Robert Solomon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William W. Matchneer III, Associate 
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Regulatory Affairs and 
Manufactured Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 
7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) 708-6409 (this is 
not a toll-free number). Persons who have difficulty hearing or 
speaking may access this number via TTY by calling the toll-free 
Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Consensus Committee is mandated and 
established under the authority of Section 604(a) of the National 
Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 
(``the Act''), 42 U.S.C. 5401 et seq. Pursuant to the Act, the 
Consensus Committee (an advisory committee), not less than once during 
each two-year period, is charged with providing recommendations to the 
Secretary to revise, and interpret manufactured home construction and 
safety standards and procedural and enforcement regulations. Further, 
the Act mandates that an administering organization administer the 
process for the Consensus Committee's development and interpretation of 
the Federal standards and the procedural and enforcement regulations. 
The administering organization that administers this process is the 
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). This notice requests that 
proposed revisions to the Federal standards and regulations be 
submitted to the Consensus Committee for consideration through the 
administering organization, NFPA. The NFPA is responsible for ensuring 
delivery of all proposals to the Consensus Committee for review and 
consideration.

    Dated: April 27, 2007.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing Commissioner.
 [FR Doc. E7-8498 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
No. 45238.

#### Protest 845787-G of Western Novelty Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the loving cups are similar to those passed upon in Abstract 43785. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was therefore sustained. As to the silk shamrocks it was stipulated that the merchandise is the same as that passed upon in Abstract 34745. The claim at 65 percent under paragraph 1211 was therefore sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 9662)

#### United States *v.*J. M. Altieri

Entry No. 3295.

(Decided April 12, 1960)

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Darnel I. Auster*and *Samuel D. Speetor,*trial attorneys) for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Ford, Judge:

The above appeal for reappraisement was filed by-the collector of customs at San Juan, P.R., against the appraisement. *653by the United States appraiser of merchandise at that port, pursuant to section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, of certain canvas basketball and tennis shoes with rubber soles.

When this matter was called for a hearing, a letter from the importer of record was received in evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 1, in which the parties agreed as to the following values:

> Ref. Sizes Pairs in sizes Appraised value per pair

> 113 4/9 180 $2.25

> 10/13 120 2. 35

> 1/2 60 2.50

> 111 4/9 180 2.55

> .10/13 120 2.65

> 1/2 60 2.80 .

> 207 4/10 644 2.25

> 11/3 552 2.45

> 220D ' 4/10 140 2.25

> 11/3 120 2.45

> All less 2%, packed

In view of the Presidential proclamation, dated February 1, 1933, reported in 63 Treas. Dec. 232, T.D. 46158, and the foregoing stipulation of facts, I find that the American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1402(g)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise and that said values are as agreed to and set forth above.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT
23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (commission file No. 333-93229), and on Form S-3
(commission file No. 333-96901) of our report dated March 28, 2008,
with respect to the financial statements and financial statement schedule for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 of Datalink Corporation
which appear in this December 31, 2007 Annual Report of Form 10-K.  /s/ McGLADREY &
PULLEN, LLP  Minneapolis, Minnesota March 28, 2008
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Chase Manhattan Owner Trust 1998-A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of February 1, 1998 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by
and between Chase USA and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as
trustee (the "Trustee"), does hereby certify that:

      1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
         January 1, 2000 until December 31, 2000 was conducted under my
         supervision.

      2. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
         fully performed in all material respects all its obligations, under the
         Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no material
         default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is
         continuing except as set forth in paragraph 3 below.

      3. None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 26th day of March 2001.



                                               /s/ Keith Schuck
                                               ---------------------
                                               Keith Schuck
                                               Vice President
Exhibit 32.1   SKINOVATION PHARMACEUTICAL INCORPORATED  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated.


|                       |                                                                                    
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010 | /s/ Hugo Rodier
Hugo Rodier
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
No. 47031.

#### Protest 764324-G of Mrs. Julia D’Wald Cordley (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of four -artistic antique tureens and covers produced prior to the year 1830. In accord-ance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1811 was sustained. 'The protest was abandoned as to all other items.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1396 

To amend title 31 of the United States Code to require that Federal children’s 

programs be separately displayed and analyzed in the President’s budget. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2011 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend title 31 of the United States Code to require 

that Federal children’s programs be separately displayed 

and analyzed in the President’s budget. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Budget 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 31. 

7 Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is 

8 amended by— 

9 (1) redesignating paragraph (37), as added by 

10 Public Law 111–352, as paragraph (39); and 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1396 IS

1 (2) adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(40)(A) A detailed, separate analysis for the 

3 prior fiscal year, the current fiscal year, the fiscal 

4 year for which the budget is submitted, and the en5 suing fiscal year identifying the amounts of gross 

6 and net appropriations or obligational authority and 

7 outlays that are directed to children within the 

8 United States and territories including— 

9 ‘‘(i) summaries of the total amount of such 

10 appropriations or new obligational authority 

11 and outlays requested for children and chil12 dren’s programs; 

13 ‘‘(ii) an estimate of current levels of spend14 ing on children and children’s programs; and 

15 ‘‘(iii) a detailed breakdown of spending on 

16 children and children’s programs by agency, de17 partment, and initiative. 

18 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘children’ 

19 means individuals under the age of 19. 

20 ‘‘(C) In this paragraph, spending on children 

21 includes— 

22 ‘‘(i) Federal entitlement spending that 

23 goes directly to children; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1396 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) outlays for programs and initiatives 

2 that, consistent with their mission, deliver serv3 ices exclusively to children; 

4 ‘‘(iii) outlays for programs and initiatives 

5 that, while not serving children directly, have as 

6 a core mission goal, the improvement of chil7 dren’s health, education, welfare, and general 

8 well-being; and 

9 ‘‘(iv) a share of funding for Federal pro10 grams and initiatives that deliver services to 

11 both children and adults that is consistent with 

12 the share of program benefits for children based 

13 on the best available data. 

14 ‘‘(D) In implementing this paragraph, including 

15 determining what Federal activities or accounts con16 stitutes spending on children or children’s programs, 

17 the Office of Management and Budget shall consult 

18 periodically with the Committees on the Budget of 

19 the Senate and the House, the Committees on Ap20 propriations of the Senate and the House, and the 

21 Congressional Budget Office.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 96-6019.

#### Lacey *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Before the Third Division,

October 26, 1942

No. 47675.

#### Protest 766874-G of Staikos Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the merchandise consists of olives in brine the same as those the subject of *Skourtsis*v. *United States*(T. D. 48218), the claim at 20 cents per gallon under paragraph 744 was sustained.
No. 39164.

#### Protests 991737-G, etc., of Judkins & McCormick Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Hats and other articles in part of lace similar to those involved in *Pustet*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Motifs and other articles in chief value of cellulose filaments were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31. Abstract 37230 followed.
Exhibit 32

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: June 28, 2004                        By: /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Alex Stelmak
                                              Chief Financial Officer


Date: June 28, 2004                        By: /s/ Abel Raskas
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Abel Raskas
                                              President
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

** **

**INDEPENDENTAUDITORS’ CONSENT**

** **

The Board of DirectorsDatalink Corporation:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.333-93229) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement (No. 333-96901) on Form S-3of Datalink Corporation of our reports dated February 6, 2004, with respect tothe balance sheets of Datalink Corporation as of December 31, 2003 and 2002,and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flowsfor the years then ended, and the related financial statement schedule for theyears ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, which reports appear in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Datalink Corporation.

 

Ourreport refers to our audit of the disclosures added to revise the 2001financial statements to include the transitional disclosures required byStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, *Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets*, which was adopted bythe Company as of January 1, 2002. However, we were not engaged to audit,review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 financial statements of DatalinkCorporation, other than with respect to such disclosures.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP           |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota |
| March 19, 2004         |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.
1350, as adopted), Edward A. Keible, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Endwave
Corporation (the "Company"), and Julianne M. Biagini, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:


        1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
"QUARTERLY REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


        2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
the 14th day of November, 2003.


/s/EDWARD A. KEIBLE, JR                 /s/JULIANNE M. BIAGINI
------------------------------          -------------------------------
Edward A. Keible, Jr.                   Julianne M. Biagini
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer



                                       26
No. 54907.

#### The Carbone Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 159170-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
No. 96-5945.

#### Patterson *v.*Wisconsin.

Ct. App. Wis. Cer-tiorari denied.
Case No. 9,887.

#### MATTHEWS v. MATTHEWS.

[Cited in Kain v. Gibboney. Case No. 7,595. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]