alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 
 
 Certification
        of CEO Pursuant to
 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350,
 As
        Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Energy Corp. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on August 11, 2006 (the "Report"), Keith G. Larsen Chief
        Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
                  Keith G. LarsenKeith
                  G. Larsen,Chief
                  Executive OfficerAugust
                  11, 2006
 
 
 This
        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
        purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
        amended.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        U.S. Energy Corp. and will be retained by U.S. Energy Corp. and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 26, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41755 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO ELIUD GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-269-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sergio Eliud Garza pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court determined that Garza was an armed career criminal and sentenced him to the statutory minimum of 180 months in prison pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Garza argues that the district court erred in determining that his Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation was a qualifying violent felony conviction for purposes of 18 U.S.C.No. 04-41755 -2- § 924(e). Garza contends that this court’s holding to the contrary in United States v. Silva , 957 F.2d 157, 162 (5th Cir. 1992), was undercut by Shepard v. United States , 125 S. Ct. 1254 (2005). Shepard did not undercut Silva ; Shepard extended the holding of Taylor v. United States , 495 U.S. 575 (1990), to cases in the guilty-plea context and clarified which documents could be considered when determining whether a prior conviction is for a generic burglary that can be used to enhance a sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. See Shepard 125 S. Ct. at 1263. Alternatively, Garza concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Silva , but he nevertheless raises it here to preserve it for further review. Garza argues that his sentence was improperly enhanced under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) because the indictment did not contain any information regarding his prior convictions and because the fact of those convictions were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes that his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent.
See United States v. Stone , 306 F.3d 241, 243 (5th Cir. 2002); United States v. Affleck , 861 F.2d 97, 99 (5th Cir. 1988). He further concedes that is argument is foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). Garza is raising the issue to preserve it for possible further review. Garza also argues that the statute of conviction, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), is unconstitutional because it does not require a substantial effect on interstate commerce and is thus an improperNo. 04-41755 -3- exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause. This argument is unavailing. “This court has repeatedly emphasized that the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” United States v. De Leon , 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999). Garza concedes that his argument is foreclosed and raises it to preserve it for further possible review.

AFFIRMED.
99-0633 (La. 4/23/99)

#### H.R. GRAF, et al. v. The TOWN OF ST. GABRIEL.

No. 99-C-0633.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: St. Gabriel Town of; — Defendants); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Iberville 18th Judicial District Court Div. “A” Number *88947,700; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number 97CA-2022

Denied.

VICTORY, J. not on panel.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MBT Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date:  May 8, 2009
    /s/ John L. SkibskiJohn L. SkibskiChief Financial Officer
Order entered October 29, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 12 - 01376 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 0137 7 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 0137 8 - CR No. 05 - 12 - 01 448 - CR

JESSE C. CASTILLO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 3 63rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F12 - 40677 - W , F11 - 40913 - W, F11 - 40914 - W, F11 - 40924 - W 

### O RDER On May 31, 2013, we ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file supplemental clerk’s record s containing a d etailed itemization of the costs assessed in th ese case s , including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. On June 4, 2013, the Dallas County District Clerk filed supplemental clerk’s record s . However, the detail itemization of costs included in the supplemental record s does not comply with the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . arts. 103.001, 103.006 (West 2006). Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within seven days of the date of this order, second supplemental clerk’s record s that contain a detailed itemization of the costsassessed in th ese case s that comply with articles 103.001 and 103.006 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure. See id. art. 103.001 (“A cost is not payable by the person charged with the cost until a written bill is produced or is ready to be produced, containing the items of cost, signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost .”) emphasis added); 103.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an officer of the court shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and send the bill of cost to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed) (e mphasis added).

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
No. 62115.

#### Frederick H. Giesler et al. *v.*United States,

protests 189387-K, etc. (Nogales).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, *619similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit
10.36





ADDENDUM
TO EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT





This
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AND
NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT (this "Addendum"), dated as
of February 18, 2008, is between The Sheridan Group, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the "Employer"), and Gary
J. Kittredge (the "Employee")
(collectively, “the Parties”).





WHEREAS, the Parties entered
into an Employment and Non-Competition Agreement (the “Agreement”) on or about
April 1, 2007; and





WHEREAS, a question has arisen
between the Parties with respect to the application and duration of §§6(e), 7, 8
and 9 of the Agreement; and





WHEREAS, the Parties wish to
enter into this Addendum to clarify their intent and eliminate any ambiguity
with respect to §§6(e), 7, 8 and 9 of the Agreement; and





WHEREAS, it is the intent of
the Parties that all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue to
remain in full force and effect, subject to the clarification set forth in this
Addendum.





NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby
agreed as follows:





1.           The
above recitals are incorporated herein by reference, and are intended to be
binding upon the Parties.





2.           The
Parties acknowledge and agree that it is the mutual intent of the Parties that
the Employee’s rights and remedies upon termination set forth in §6(e) of the
Agreement apply to the termination at anytime of
Employee’s employment by the Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors and/or
assigns) without Cause pursuant to §6(c) or by the Employee with Good Reason
pursuant to §6(d).  Moreover, it is the Parties’ specific intent that
the Employee’s rights and remedies upon termination set forth in §6(e) will
survive the termination of the Agreement.





3.           The
Parties acknowledge and agree that it is the mutual intent of the Parties that
the Employee’s obligations to the Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors
and/or assigns) set forth in §7 (Inventions; Assignment); §8 (Confidential
Information); and §9 (Non-Competition) of the Agreement apply to the termination
at any timeof Employee’s employment with Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors
and/or assigns). Moreover, it is the Parties’ specific intent that the
Employee’s obligations to the Employer set forth in §7, §8 and §9 will survive
the termination of the Agreement.





4.           The
Parties each acknowledge and agree that this Addendum is supported by the
consideration set forth in the Agreement, which the Parties acknowledge to be
good and valuable.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed as of the date and year first above
written.





THE SHERIDAN GROUP,
      INC.By:
            /s/JohnA.SaxtonJohn A. SaxtonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/GaryJ.KittredgeGary J. Kittredge
Exhibit 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Allen D. Goodman, Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the
general partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Allen D. GoodmanAllen D. GoodmanChief Financial and Principal Accounting OfficerNovember 12, 2004




E-5
No. 48176.

#### Protests 980577-G, etc., of Heinsheimer Bros. (Inc.) et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that some of the items in question consist of hemp hats the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), and that other items consist of hemp knotted straw hats the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 46497. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1-) was sustained as to both items.
#### Budd, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6518.

Entry No. 712185, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September, 27, 1944, etc.

Certified September 1944, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 16, 1944, etc.

(Decided November 15, 1946)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tidson, Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted the appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues herein are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the values found by tne appraiser, less any additions made by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 19, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10932 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARTIN A. CALDERON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:03-CR-88-1

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Martin A. Calderon, federal prisoner # 25031-051, appeals the denial of his postjudgment motion, “Replevin/Sequestration Return of Creditor’s Secured Property. Release of Debtor’s Surety, and Vacate Exemption.” In the motion, Calderon referred to himself as “DEBTOR ROY MARTINEZ/AKA/MARTIN CALDERON” and asked the district court to vacate “the original action against DEBTOR” and to “release the DEBTOR’S surety Roy Martinez/aka/ Martin Calderon from liability.” The district court denied the motion, finding that it was frivolous.No. 06-10932 -2- Calderon has appealed from the denial of a meaningless motion. See United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994). No matter how his postconviction motion is construed, the appeal of its denial is frivolous. See Montgomery v. United States , 933 F.2d 348, 350 (5th Cir. 1991). The appeal is therefore dismissed. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Calderon is warned that further frivolous filings will result in the imposition of sanctions.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
OFFlCEOFTHEA170RNEY QENERALOF- . **AUSTIN**

Honorable I. R, Yright Superintendent Texae .Pc.hool

for the Dear Austin, Texas

Dear Slrr Opinion 

### No.O-i+082 Ret Supplementing salaries or employeee or elaemosynar~ in**rrtltutions,** under the protlslons or Cenate Bill No. l+02, hota, Regular Session, 47th Legi8latur8.
The general **rider ’**  appended to Senate Bill 402, Aots, Re&ar Seselon, 47th Legiblatura, oontalne a provl- .alonreading aa rolloust

*(a) In these approprlatione the Leglslature has provided a fairly Uniform soale.or salaries ror similar seroioes throughout the institution8 without, however, 

### dlrrerentlatlng ln the amounts to be paid emplofaee reoelvlng, end those not receiving room, board and laundry l rrom th8 State; and to prevent lnequalltice In salaries to those employees not rsoeiving any 

### or all of suah perquisites it is provided that the Superintendent, upon the writtan approval. or the Board or Gontrol may e.djuotsuc.hemplopee'a eala,rleaout or th8 reepeotlve support and malntenanoe appropriations by not eXO88ding Twelve ($12.00) Dollars per month eaoh. Wore easily to adjust suoh items proper transrere from aupport and maintenanoe to salary approprletions may be made annually ormore Often."

Your letter of the 2nd inetant inquires whether, und,erthis law, you may, with the.i\Atten approval oi'the C?tateBoard of 

### Control, sUp.@8m8tltthe S-lari8s 0: eJ@Oy88a who do oot'reoeive room, board and Laundry, but reoelve one or two meals on the oampus. In other words, your qUeStiOnHonorable .E.R. Wight, Pag8 2

Ia whether an employe8.who raoelrerrdome, but not all, of the p8rquIeitee Of room, 

### boardand laundry, may haV8 his salary supplemented under the prwieiona of thla rider, with thd WTitt8ttapprOva1 Or the 8tate Board Of.Control~,or u-h&her, on the oontrary, o.?lythose employ8es mey have their aalarlss supplemsnted who i-SC8iY8none or the68 p8rquiSit88.

The perqulsitse 

## wema to 

### are 

### room,board and laundry. The employee Nho may, with the approval or the **Boerd,ar** Control, 

### reoelrea salary adjustment within th8 llml

### tatlonaprovided by this aot, ere those employeas uho do 

### not reoeire any or all of suah perqulolteei Xt 

### seem3olear00 UB thst the Legielature intended to p8rmIt the salaries of those-smploydae Who **r808iVed** nW8, or 188s than ell, Or 

### the perquisites mentioned, to be adjueted In aooordano8 

### withthe prorielons0r the ridor. To hold Otherrvia8would be to at

### taohundueeisairloanoe to the we 

## 0r th8 word *any", and to 1;gnoreentirely the uae of 

### theword *all" in that portion OS th8 

### riderreaalngt **“ ana**  to'prsvent Inequalities In ealarleo to thost employsee 

### notreoelrlng any 

### orall or suoh perquldter.

. '.. .
We truet that th8 fOr8gOiW adequately aneWBra your qU8btiOQ.

YO& V8Py truly
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# The People and Culture Directorate welcome Human Resource interns

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
As part of the Human Resources Professional Development Program, the People and Culture Directorate is hosting two interns from Human Resources.  The rotational assignment began in June and will continue for approximately two months.

The program emphasis is on change management and organizational alignment.  The interns will shadow various subject matter experts in the People Support, Culture and People and Development Divisions to gain hands on experience with change management and organizational alignment, as well as participate in directorate meetings, presentations and assigned co-lead projects.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Councils L&MCulture L&MDLA L&MPersonal Development L&MSupervisors L&MTraining L&MLeadership L&Mmanagement L&MProcess Management L&MSenior Leadership L&M