alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Infinity  Capital Group,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I,
Gregory H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 19, 2007



/s/Gregory H. Laborde
------------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory H. Laborde, Chief Executive Officer and President


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 40474.

#### Protests 552674-G, etc., of Wm. X. Huber Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### Willie James BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 93,942

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 3, 1999.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Assistant Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, Florida, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We originally accepted jurisdiction to review *Brown v. State,*714 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), of the Florida Constitution. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted.

Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered. ,

HARDING, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

SHAW and ANSTEAD, JJ., dissent.
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. J. H., Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

June 21, 1999.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of June, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

> Whether the Pennsylvania State Police, when faced with a motion to compel compliance with an order directing the expungement of an individual’s criminal *1272record, may challenge the propriety of the original expungement order under the Criminal History Record Information Act, 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 9101-9181?
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA sends critical supplies to recovery teams, victims after Florence

By Beth Reece

DLA DistributionDLA Energy

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADefense Logistics AgencyHurricane Florencehurricane supportdisaster reliefFEMANORTHCOMwhole of government
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**

**906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Joseph M. Yorio, President and Chief Executive Officer of School Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned: 

 
 1.The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period from January 1, 2017 to December 30, 2017 (the “Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and 
 
 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of School Specialty, Inc. 
Date: March 16, 2018 

 

/s/ Joseph M. Yorio

Joseph M. Yorio

President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

 
**
No. 46408.

#### Protests 961695-G, etc., of Quong Lee & Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

GERALD ALLEN PERRY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v.

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

__________________________ 

2013-5120 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 13-CV-0332, Judge Lynn J. Bush. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

Gerald Allen Perry moves without opposition for an 

extension of time of 20 days to file his brief. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

(1) Perry’s motion is granted. 

Case: 13-5120 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 11/27/2013
PERRY v. US 2

(2) The United States should calculate its brief due 

date from the date of filing of this order. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

s24 

Case: 13-5120 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 11/27/2013
Before the First Division,

January 24, 1941

No. 45268.

#### Protest 783306-G of Wm. J. Hauser (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar to that the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, G. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Chris
      R. Decker, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:  February
      20, 2007




/s/
                  Chris R.
                  DeckerChris
                  R. Decker, Chief Financial
                  Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report of Caneum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB/A-2 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date:October 2, 2007
Before the Second Division,

April 7, 1943

No. 48174.

#### Protests 906753-G, etc., of Albert Eckstein & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the merchandise consists of racello hats similar to those involved in Abstract 47291 and that other items consist of hemp hats similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) the claims under paragraph 1504 (b). (1) were sustained.
# C_2014039EN.01002803.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/28

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 12 December 2013 — CH v Parliament

st

(Case F-129/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Accredited parliamentary assistants - Early termination of the contract - Request for assistance - Psychological harassment)

2014/C 39/52

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CH (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves and E. Taneva, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision to terminate the applicant’s employment contract and the decision rejecting his request for assistance seeking recognition of psychological harassment, and an application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 19 January 2012, terminating CH’s contract as an accredited parliamentary assistant; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 19 January 2012, terminating CH’s contract as an accredited parliamentary assistant;

| 2. | Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 15 March 2012 rejecting CH’s request for assistance of 22 December 2011; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 15 March 2012 rejecting CH’s request for assistance of 22 December 2011;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament to pay CH the sum of EUR 50 000; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament to pay CH the sum of EUR 50 000;

| 4. | Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CH. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CH.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013, p. 73.

1

---
No. 96-7595.

#### In re Serra.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
Before the First Division,

December 12, 1950

No. 54961.

#### Walco Bead Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 138263-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 54251, the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained.
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

----

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David John Grigson, Finance Director of Reuters Group PLC (the “Company”) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

a) The Company’s Annual Reporton Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

b) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

| Dated: 17 March 2006 |   | By /s/ David J Grigson          |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                 |   |                            |
|                 |   | David J GrigsonFinance Director |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Forrest P. Jordan, Chief Financial Officer of IWTTesoro Corporation, certify that:

 

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of IWT TesoroCorporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004;

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisannual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

 

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

----

 

6.          I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: May 14, 2004 | By:                     | /s/ Forrest P. Jordan |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|               | Forrest P. Jordan,      |
|               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: September 12, 2005                 By: /s/ Abel Raskas
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Abel Raskas
                                            President


Date: September 12, 2005                 By: /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Alex Stelmak
                                            Chief Financial Officer
No. 96-7868.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 54971.

#### Associated Merchandising Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 96842-K, etc. (New York).

*343Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 43159.

#### Protests 952190-G, etc., of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., at al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
Matrice tOO-Calibrating the Compass 

F'lvm DJI Wiki 

IMPORTANT: Be !1IR! to c:alilmlte the c:ompiiSS fur every MW flight lollll1ilm.. 1"he c:ompu1 ia a very scmitive 

illltrummt 1hat requha regular eal.ibJa1ilm to euurc opdmal ffight JICifi• miiii(A Almormal compw data due to a 

ladt of c;alilnmon am lead to poor flight per.limDina: or evcu fisilun:. 

Waraillg: 

• Do NOT calibrate yo111' compass '\like thae is o m"""C of strcmg magaetic inter&mlce.lllldl u magnetite 

quarrioe, parking atnlotmes, and~ stedrcinfoo:enWl'"'· 

• Do NOT carry fm~c: objeclll mdlu bya with y011 dllriDg c:alibmtion. 

• Do NOT calilmlto bnrid• mu&ive mlltd objec:tB. 

• Do NOT calibrate in 111 indoor ~p~~~:e. 

Calilntion P.roc:edum 

Choole an open apace to cany out the following procedmes. 

1. Ensure the compass ia c:alibratecl. If you ctid not c:alibrate the eompus as port of your p:re-flisht ~OilS, or if 

you haw mtmel to a -location sinco tho last cah'bration, tap tho Syatem Statas bar in tho app and. select Cah'b.rale, 

thm fOllow the OD-sc:re&l!l iDstrw:timm to calibrate the ain:rafl: slep-by-stllp. 

2. Hold the ain:rafthorizo!dall.y, and rotate it 360 desr- along the ceutral.am. Tho.Ain:Jd Statu& Indicator will 

emit a solid green light. 

' 

' 

<f·~ 

~fiiJ¥~i ..... t 
1011/2015 Matrice 100-CalibratirQ the Can pass- DJI Wiki 

4. Recalibrate the compass if the Aircraft Status Indicator becomes solid red. 

Note: 

If the Aircraft Status Indicator flashes red and yellow alternatively after compass calibration, move your aircraft to a 

different location to carry out the calibration. 

Tips: 

Calibrate the compass after you launch the DJI Pilot app if you are prompted to do so. 

When to Recalibrate 

1. The compass data is abnormal, and the Aircraft Status Indicator is flashing red and yellow alternatively. 

2. Flying in a new location, or a location that is different from your last flight. 

3. The mechanical structure of the M100 is changed, i.e. the mounting position ofthe GPS module is changed. 

4. Severe drifting occurs in flight, i.e. the M100 has difficulty flying in a straight line. 

Retrieved from "http:/ /wiki.dji.com/en/index.php?title=Matrice _1 00-Calibrating_ the_ Compass&oldid=23276" 

• This page was last modified on 21 July 2015, at 05:15. 

• This page has been accessed 261 times. 

http://wi ki .dji .oom/en/i nclex.phptMatrice_100-Cal ibralin!Lihe_Canpass 2/2