alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# June New Employee Orientation

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The DLA Land and Maritime New Employee Orientation will take place in the Building 20 Buckeye Room June 20 from 9 a.m. - 3 p.m. and June 21 from 9 a.m. - 2 p.m. on the Defense Supply Center Columbus.

Starting a new job can be confusing and stressful. During orientation, there’ll be presentations from various organizations that will provide guidance and support to help new associates become better acclimated to the organization and embrace their new career. 

New associates from all local DLA-hosted tenants, military and interns are welcome to attend.The training is mandatory for all new DLA Land and Maritime employees and is held the last Wednesday and Thursday of every month. 

Attendance is tracked and reported to Command. 

If you have any questions, please contact NEO Coordinator Dawn Sutton at 614-692-6824.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Building Connections L&MCommunity L&MCulture L&MDLA L&Mnew employee L&MPeople & Culture L&MProtect the Workforce L&MPACER/Intern L&M
#### ALPINE VIEW COMPANY LIMITED; Bjorn Hansen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ATLAS COPCO A.B.; Atlas Copco Robbins; Atlas Copco Compressors Incorporated; and Atlas Copco Comptec Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-20879

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 1998.

Brendan D. Cook, Sherry Louise Deaver, Verner, Liipfert, Bernard, McPherson, *629Hand & Chartered, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Stephen W. Schueler, Ann Ryan Robertson, Winstead, Sechrest & Minick, Houston, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

During the pendency of this appeal, our Court sitting en banc decided *Marathon Oil Co. v. A.G. Ruhrgas,*145 F.3d 211 (5th Cir.1998) (en banc). The procedural circumstances involved in this appeal are very similar to those involved in *Marathon Oil*and our decision herein is controlled by that en banc decision.

Accordingly, we vacate the following orders entered in the court below:

a. Memorandum and Recommendation entered under date of July 31, 1996 by the magistrate judge which recommended (i) that defendant Atlas Copco AB’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (docket entry 22) be granted; (ii) that defendant Atlas Copco Robbins’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (docket entry 26) be granted; and (iii) that plaintiffs’ motion to remand this case (docket entry 16) be denied as moot.

b. The Order of the district court entered on October 1, 1996 adopting the magistrate judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation entered under date of July 31, 1996 as described in the foregoing sub-paragraph;

c. The Memorandum and Recommendation entered under date of August 1, 1996 by the magistrate judge which recommended that the motions of defendants Atlas Copco Comptec, Inc. and Atlas Cop-co Compressors, Inc. to dismiss for forum non conveniens (docket entries 4 and 9) be granted; and

d.The Order of the district court entered under date of October 1, 1996 adopting the magistrate judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation entered under date of August 1, 1996 as described in the foregoing subparagraph.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for a determination as to whether the federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction of the cause of action as removed from the state court.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Donald E. WILLEN, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 73030.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 22, 1999.

Irene C. Earns, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Anne E. Hawley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*585Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., CRANDALL and AHRENS, J.J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Donald E. Willen appeals his convictions by a jury in the Circuit Court of St. Charles County of assault in the second degree, section 565.060, RSMo 1994; kidnapping, section 565.110, RSMo 1994; attempted escape from confinement, section 575.210, RSMo 1994 and three counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015. Appellant was sentenced to a term of twenty years for assault in the second degree, a term of life imprisonment for kidnapping and a term of life imprisonment for attempted escape from confinement, to be served consecutive to each other and consecutive to three concurrent one-hundred year terms for the armed criminal action convictions.

We have read the briefs and reviewed the legal file and transcripts. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b)
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

COLLECTIVE EDGE, LLC, FERG'S SPORTS BAR 

& GRILL, INC., CARLOS LOPEZ, JR., COLLEEN 

A. LOPEZ, 

Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellant

______________________

2024-2095, 24-2154

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:20-cv-00034-AOB, 1:20-cv-00048-AOB, 1:20-cv00159-AOB, Judge Armando O. Bonilla. 

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 24-2095 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 09/18/2024
2 COLLECTIVE EDGE, LLC V. US

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

September 18, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 18, 2024

Case: 24-2095 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 09/18/2024
March 13 , 2015 U . S . Department of Transportation Docket Operations , M-30 1200 New Jersey Avenue , SE GREENPOINT Techno l og i es

Room W12 - 140, West Bldg . Ground Floor Washington , DC 20590-0001 Subj e ct: Petition for Partial Exemption from Spec ial Federal Aviat ion Regulation No. 109 Paragraph 7(a) and§ 25.80 7 (f)(4) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations on Boeing Model 787-8 Airplane Reference : FAA Project No . ST12319SE-T Encl osed please find Greenpoint Technologies ' petition for a partial exemption from Sp e ci al Federal Aviation Regulat ion No.109 paragraph 7(a) and §25.807(f)(4) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) on a Boeing Model 787-8 airplane . This request is necessary in order to certify the desired airplane configuration for the end customer . Greenpoint Tec hnologies respe c tfully requests that the publication and comment period be waived in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.87 for the following reasons: • The exemption will not set a precedent and is non-controversial ; • Delaying action on our petition would affect us adversely as the modified airplane is scheduled to be completed and delivered in April 2016. Please contact the undersigned if you have further questions by email at bbaillie@greenpnt.com or by phone at 206-947 - 2672 .

# t!AL-~**'**

# ara Baillie Senior Certification Engineer Enclosure cc Ms . Kimberly DeVoe , FAA

G ree n po int Tec hn o logies, In c. • 460 0 Carill o n Pt • Kirkl a n d WA 98033 • Te l : (425) 828-2777 Fax : (425) 827- 6 1 05
No. 65827.

#### Don O. Thayer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/18209 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of enlarger heads the same as those the subject of Abstract 61579, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2013071EN.01003002.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/30

---

Action brought on 13 December 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-152/12)

2013/C 71/53

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to calculate accredited pension rights acquired before entry into service on the basis of the new General Implementing Provisions.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 26 March 2012 concerning the calculation of accredited pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service with the Commission under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 26 March 2012 concerning the calculation of accredited pension rights acquired by the applicant before his entry into service with the Commission under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting his complaint of 3 September 2012 directed against the decision fixing the calculation of his pension rights acquired before his entry into service in the EU pension scheme; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul the decision rejecting his complaint of 3 September 2012 directed against the decision fixing the calculation of his pension rights acquired before his entry into service in the EU pension scheme;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. sec. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of IWT Tesoro Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Forrest Jordan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.

 
| Dated: August 8, 2003 | /s/Forrest Jordan       |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  | Forrest Jordan          |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
No. 46456.

#### Protest 995417-G of Goldfarb Novelty Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the paperweights in question are similar to those the subject of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20), the claim of 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
#### Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee In Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. George W. BATTERMAN, Jr. & George Batterman, Sr., d/b/a Batterman’s Sand & Gravel Co. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. Joe EARHART. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation. Bankrupt, v. E. T. PYBUS. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. WENATCHEE LUMBER CO., a corporation. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. WELLS & WADE, Inc., a corporation. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. INTERSTATE TELEPHONE CO., a corporation. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. W. R. McMULLEN and B. F. McMullen, d/b/a McMullen Office Equipment Co. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee In Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. PESHASTIN LUMBER & BOX CO. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. F. W. HEIMBIGNER. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. Rufus WOODS. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. J. A. WEBER. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. W. N. CHILDS. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. R. M. WILEY. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. Elmer SCHNEIDMILLER. Adolph W. ENGSTROM, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Northwest Chemurgy Cooperative, a corporation, Bankrupt, v. Arthur BENZEL.

United States District Court E. D. Washington, N. D.

Nos. 725, 727-729, 731, 733-738, 740, 742, 744, 745.

Jan. 5, 1949.

Eggerman, Rosling & Williams, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff.

Hughes & Jeffers and Sam R. Sumner, all of Wenatchee, Wash., and Graves, Kizer & Graves, Thomas Malott, and E. A. Cornelius, all of Spokane, Wash., for all defendants.

DRIVER, Chief Judge.

The motion to dismiss will he denied for the reasons stated in Engstrom v. DeVos, 81 F.Supp. 8S4.
Exhibit 10.6


 


Summary of Terms of Verbal Consulting Agreement with Digital Wasabi,
LLC


 


	
  Parties:

  	
  Fairground
  Media LLC and Digital Wasabi LLC.

  
	
  Scope:

  	
  Digital
  Wasabi provided technology services and web development consulting services
  to Fairground Media.

  
	
  Compensation:

  	
  $35,000.

  
	
  Term:

  	
  April 2007
  until July 2007.
No. 74-5914.

#### Nolan *v.*Gunn, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-76485 and 333-70534) and on Form S-8(Nos. 333-102003, 333-90676, 333-45258 and 333-36392) of Icoria, Inc. of our report dated March 28, 2005 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

 

March 31, 2005
---



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Pluris Energy Group Inc., a
company duly formed under the laws of Nevada (the "Company"), for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), Sacha Spindler, President (Chief Executive Officer)
and Rahul Gandhi, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|April 15, 2009 | */s/ Sacha Spindler*       
|-------------- | ---------------------------
|               | Sacha Spindler             
|               | Chief Executive Officer    
|               |                            
|               |                            
|               | */s/ Rahul Gandhi*         
|               | Rahul Gandhi               
|               | Chief Financial Officer and
|               | Principal Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Pluris Energy Group Inc. and will be retained by Pluris
Energy Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
No. 48798.

#### Protest 89687-K of Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record upon which this case was submitted showed that certain items consist of artificial flowers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Robinson-Goodman Co.*v. *United States*(17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) and the record therein was admitted in this case. Upon the established facts and the cited case certain of the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419 as claimed. Protest sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William C. Robinson, CEO, CFO, Chairman and Principal Executive, Financial and
Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                            By: /s/ William C. Robinson
                                                --------------------------------
                                                William C. Robinson
                                                CEO, Chairman and
                                                Principal Executive Officer

                                                June 22, 2006
# C_2012287EN.01002701.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/27

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg), lodged on 20 July 2012 — Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Ulrike Wiering, Markus Wiering

(Case C-347/12)

2012/C 287/52

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Caisse nationale des prestations familiales

Appellant:

Respondents: Ulrike Wiering, Markus Wiering

Respondents:

Question referred

Question referred

For the calculation of any differential allowance that may be due, in accordance with Articles 1(u)(i), 4(1)(h) and 76 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, (1) as amended, and with Article 10[(1)](b)(i) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, (2) by the competent institution of the State of the place of work, is it necessary to take into account, as family benefits of the same kind, all of the benefits received by the family of the migrant worker in the State of residence, in the present case the ‘Elterngeld’ and ‘Kindergeld’ provided for by German legislation?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ, English Special Edition 1971(II), p. 416.

1

(2)  OJ, English Special Edition 1972(I), p. 160.

2

---