alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Old Age Insurance for Household Workers

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Old Age Insurance for Household Workers : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 220*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1947,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5491,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 43163.

#### Protests 998364-G, etc., of Ritter Carlton Co. (New York).

*387Opinion by

Dallingee, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of pencil sharpeners similar to those the subject of Abstract 41633. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
The Quantum Group, Inc.
File No. 000-31727


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Donald B. Cohen Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 16, 2005                           By: /S/ Donald B. Cohen
                                                    --------------------
                                                    Donald B. Cohen
                                                    Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Quantum Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Quantum Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
The Quantum Group, Inc.
File No. 000-31727



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Noel J. Guillama, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 16, 2005                                By: /S/ Noel J. Guillama
                                                         ---------------------
                                                         Noel J. Guillama
                                                         Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Quantum Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Quantum Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request..
#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6521.

Entry No. 725124/2.

Invoice dated London, England, February 1945.

Certified February 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., March 21, 1945.

(Decided November 15, 1946)

*John R. Rafter*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issue herein and the issue involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, are similar in all material respects, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence herein.

Accepting this stiuplation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Technologies
Group, Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
the undersigned, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: June 15, 2009
                                               /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Alex Stelmak
                                               Chief Executive Officer,
                                               Chairman of the Board and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
No. 50766.

#### Protests 974212-G, etc., of American Express Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 39148.

#### Protests 84538-G, etc., of Gimbel Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that certain items consist of articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 31 was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Buko  von  Krosigk,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  on  the  Amended  Form  10-QSB of Wineshares  International Inc. for the
quarter  ended  July  31,  2002  fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained  in the Quarterly Report on the Amended Form 10-QSB fairly presents in
all  material  respects  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of
Wineshares  International,  Inc.


                          By:    /s/ Buko  von  Krosigk
                                 ---------------------
                          Name:  Buko  von  Krosigk
                          Title: Chief  Executive  Officer
                          Date:  April  28,  2003


I,  Gerard  Darmon  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amended
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Wineshares  International, Inc. for the
quarter  ended  July  31,  2002  fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained  in the Quarterly Report on the Amended Form 10-QSB fairly presents in
all  material  respects  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of
Wineshares  International  Inc.

                          By:    /s/ Gerard  Darmon
                                 --------------------
                          Name:  Gerard  Darmon
                          Title: Chief  Financial  Officer
                          Date:  April  28,  2003
EX-10.1



 





Exhibit 10.1




LNB Bancorp, Inc. 2007 Chief Executive Officer Long Term Incentive Plan




     The purpose of the LNB Bancorp, Inc. 2007 Chief Executive Officer Long Term Incentive Plan
(the “Long Term Incentive Plan”) is to provide the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of LNB Bancorp,
Inc. (the “Bancorp”) with a long term incentive to achieve superior personal performance at the
Bancorp during 2007 in order to benefit the Bancorp and its shareholders. The Long Term Incentive
Plan has been developed through communication and reflection on subjective performance goals
intended to challenge the CEO to obtain the Bancorp’s long term objectives.



     The 2007 CEO Long Term Incentive goals include, but are not limited to:




	 	1.	 	Positive assessment of changes to loan process and loan quality;
	 
	 	2.	 	Progress of Independence Loan/Treasury Office;
	 
	 	3.	 	Progress of Avon Pointe Commercial Real Estate Office;
	 
	 	4.	 	Progress and success of Morgan Bank integration;
	 
	 	5.	 	Growth in Fee Income; and
	 
	 	6.	 	New Branch performance





     The Compensation Committee (“the Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Bancorp will
oversee the administration of the Long Term Incentive Plan. The Committee may delegate ministerial
duties to other persons and the Bancorp will furnish the Committee with clerical and other
assistance for administration of the Long Term Incentive Plan.



     The amount of the incentive payment to be paid to the CEO under the Long Term Incentive Plan
will be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, after December 31, 2007. This
payment, which can be up to 50% of the CEO’s base pay, is based upon the Committee’s determination
of the CEO’s achievement of the CEO’s 2007 Long Term Incentive goals. If the Committee determines
that the CEO has earned a long term incentive payment hereunder, the Committee will notify the CEO
of the amount, if any, and the long term incentive payment will be made to the CEO in cash, equity
incentive awards, or a combination thereof, no later than March 15, 2008. All payments under the
Long Term Incentive Plan will be subject to applicable tax withholding.



     The Committee will have the authority, in its sole discretion, to interpret the Long Term
Incentive Plan and to make any determinations it may deem necessary or advisable under the Plan.
Any such interpretation or determination of the Committee will be binding on the CEO.
No. 40442.

#### Protest 958685-G of William Willheim Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The protest was submitted without the introduction of evidence in support of the claims made. On the record presented it was overruled.
Before the Second Division,

August 5, 1938

No. 39158.

#### Protests 129622-G, etc., of Henry Kayser & Fils (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 at 60 percent-under paragraph 31; (2) embroidered laces and net trimmings at 75 percent under-paragraph 1430, *Pustet*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and Abstract 12555 followed; (3) embroidered veils at 75 percent under paragraph 1430, *Pustet*v. *United States, supra,*followed; and (4) hats in chief value of silk at-60 percent under paragraph 1210; and (5) hats and hoods in chief value of cellulose-filaments at 60 percent under paragraph 31, *Amberg*v. *United States*(T. D. 46204) followed.
#### George M. LEWIS, M.D., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-57018.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 21, 2005.

George M. Lewis, M.D., Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Debra A. Yang, Esq., USLA—Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Mary R. Pelletier, Esq., DOJ—U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for DefendantsAppellees.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

George M. Lewis appeals pro se the district court’s order denying as untimely his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment in his Freedom of Information Act action against the Internal Revenue Service and others. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We *898review for abuse of discretion, *American Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. North American Constr. Corp.,*248 F.3d 892, 899 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that Lewis’ motion was untimely because it was filed more than a year after final judgment and did not present evidence germane to the underlying cause of action. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b); *School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 65781.

#### Selsi Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/22945, 59/25432, and 59/33440 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal map measures, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kaufman & Vinson Co.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2180), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Summary Term Sheet


 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary Term Sheet 
 December 29, 2007 - Summary Term Sheet for Financing of SYBD 
 (Supersedes all prior agreements and is basis for a SYBD board resolution) 
  

	 	•	 	 Fiona is the successor of Aventis for the SYBD fundraising efforts. 


 1 Million Bridge Loan 
  

	 	•	 	 SYBD received a bridge loan of $2.222 million on a convertible note, discounted at 11% p.a. over five years. Net proceeds were $1 million. Convertible latest
January 5, 2009 to 8,995,951 free tradable shares at a price of $0.247 at conversion. In addition 4,497,976 five-year warrants priced at $0.247 at conversion will be issued. 


  

	 	•	 	 Investors are (in net proceeds): Fiona International, S.A. $750k, Swiss Private Investor Albrecht $100k, Swiss Private Investor Kutner $100k, Swiss Private Investor
Kaelin $50k. 


  

	 	•	 	 As a finder’s fee for the loan SYBD will pay to Horizon Finance Capital Group Ltd. $100k (10% in cash of net funds received) by January 18, 2008, plus issue
2.5 million 5-year warrants at $0.245 exercise price. 


 13.5 Million Convertible Note 
  

	 	•	 	 SYBD is in the process of receiving a gross amount $13.5 million on a convertible note, discounted at 11% p.a. over five years. Net proceeds $6.075M. Convertible
latest January 5, 2009 to free tradable shares at a price of $0.247 at conversion. In addition, 27,327,935 five year warrants priced at $0.247 at conversion will be issued. 


  

	 	•	 	 Investor is Fiona International S.A. 


  

	 	•	 	 As a finder’s fee for the loan SYBD will pay to Horizon Finance Capital Group Ltd., a cash fee of equal 7% of net funds received ($6.075 million equals a cash
payment of $425,250), plus issue 2.5 million restricted shares (see below), plus issue 10 million five-year warrants at $ 0.247 exercise price. 


  

	 	•	 	 Payout of the cash finder’s fee is one week after having received $6.075 million net proceeds. 


  

	 	•	 	 SYBD agrees on issuing the warrant agreements after the funds of $6.075 million are fully received. 


  

	 	•	 	 SYBD agrees on registering the 2.5 million restricted shares as soon as practicable under the interpretations and limitations of Rule 415 adopted under the
Securities Act of 1933 in order for the offering to be a “secondary” offering of securities for selling security holders. 


 Execution by facsimile is accepted by all parties. 






 Summary Term Sheet 
 Agreed to the terms as above this 29th day of December, 2007 
  

	
	Synthetic Blood International, Inc.
	
	/s/ Chris J. Stern
	Chris J. Stern, Chairman
	
	Flona International S.A. (a Panama Corporation)
	
	/s/ Aurelio Landolt
	Aurelio Landolt
	
	Horizon Finance Capital Group Ltd. (a Panama Limited Corporation)
	
	/s/ Hans-Peter Jaberg
	Hans-Peter Jaberg
(Reap. Dec. 9068)

#### L. E. McCullough & Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 2280; 2782.

(Decided February 11, 1958)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed above were submitted for decision on the following stipulation of counsel:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the imported chamois to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less 2% discount and that there was no higher foreign value.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the items involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less 2 per centum.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

January 7, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00740

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.S., A CHILD,

From the 37th Judici al District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 02168 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On December 5, 2018, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Vincent Petrucci, filed a notice of appearance as counsel on behalf of appellee

– the State of Texas. Appellee’s brief was due December 20, 2018. However, at this time, a ppellee has not filed a brief or a motion for
extension of time.

We therefore ORDER appellee, who is represented by attorney Vincent Petrucci

, to file a brief in this court on or before January 28, 2019 . If ap pellee fails to file its brief on or before the date ordered, we will order the appeal submitted without one

.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

____________________ _____________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 7th day of January, 2019

.

_____________________ ______________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6904
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAMONA MARIA DIFAZIO, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-94-2-4, CA-96-152-4) Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ramona Maria DiFazio, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Sherrie Scott Hardwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia; Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. DiFazio , Nos. CR-94-2-4; CA-96-152-4 (E.D. Va. May 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED