alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q-A, Amendment # 1 for the quarter ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Noel J. Guillama, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: September 19, 2008



| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Noel J. Guillama                 
| | Noel J. Guillama                     
| | President and Chief Executive Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                    Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
SonoSite, Inc.

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-51820, 333-82739, 333-49401, 333-74833 and 333-60112) on Form S-8 and
registration statements (Nos. 333-68610, 333-91083 and 333-83278) on Form S-3 of
SonoSite, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2002, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of SonoSite, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and
shareholders' equity and comprehensive loss for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001 and the related financial statement
schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form
10-K/A of SonoSite, Inc.

                                     /s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 29, 2002
Case No. 8,677.

#### McCAN v. NORTON.

[Cited in Re Steadman, Case No. 13 330. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
# C_2013178EN.01001002.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2013 — Unister v OHIM (fluege.de)

(Case T-244/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark fluege.de - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 178/18

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Unister GmbH (Leipzig (Germany)) (represented by: H. Hug and A. Kessler-Jensch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 March 2012 (Case R 2149/2011-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign fluege.de as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Unister GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Unister GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 21.7.2012.

1

---
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1710 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 222 West 7th Avenue, 

Anchorage, Alaska, as the James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 13, 2011 

Mr. BEGICH (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 222 

West 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, as the James M. 

Fitzgerald United States Courthouse. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JAMES M. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES COURT4 HOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

6 located at 222 West 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, shall 

7 be known and designated as the ‘‘James M. Fitzgerald 

8 United States Courthouse’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1710 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the United States courthouse referred to in sub4 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

5 ‘‘James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# r

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION '" 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Joyce Epps, Director PennsylvaniaDepartment ofEnvironmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17101 DearMs. Epps: 

### 1 5 OCT 2007

On August 17, 2007, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Pennsylvania State hnplementation Plan (SIP) from your department. The SIP revision consists ofchanges to the nonattainment New Source Review regulation. EPAhas deteImined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing itto prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any " questions, they may direct them to Michelle L. Moyer, Permits and Technical Assessment Branch, at (215) 814-2098. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely,

Judith M. Katz, Director Air Protection Division



### CustomerServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474
#### Carl BERGERON v. MAR-CON, INC., et al.

No. 98-C-0806.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 8, 1998.

In re Bergeron, Carl;—Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Office of Workers’ Compensation, Dist. # 4, No. 96-00127; to the Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, No. CA97-0263.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.
# C_2012366EN.01002502.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy), lodged on 14 September 2012 — Crono Service Scarl and Others v Roma Capitale

(Case C-419/12)

2012/C 366/45

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Crono Service Scarl and Others

Applicants:

Defendant: Roma Capitale

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Article 49 TFEU, Article 3 TEU, Articles 3 TFEU, 4 TFEU, 5 TFEU, 6 TFEU, 101 TFEU and 102 TFEU preclude the application of Articles 3(3), 8(3) and 11 of Law No 21 of 1992 [on the carriage of passengers by public non-scheduled car and coach services] in so far as the latter provisions respectively provide that ‘[t]he registered office of the carrier, and the garage, must be located, exclusively, within the territory of the municipality which issued the authorisation’, that ‘[i]n order to obtain and maintain an authorisation for a car- and driver-hire service it is necessary to have the use, pursuant to a valid legal title, of a registered office, a garage or a vehicle rank located in the territory of the municipality which issued the authorisation’ and that ‘[b]ookings for car- and driver-hire services shall take place at the garage. Each individual car- and driver-hire service must begin and end at the garage located in the municipality in which the authorisation was issued, returning to that garage, although the collection of the user and the user’s arrival at his destination may take place also in other municipalities’?

---
APHIS Factsheet

Biotechnology Regulatory Services July 2012

Questions and 

Answers: Bayer 

CropScience’s (BCS) 

Insect-Resistant, 

Glufosinate 

Ammonium-Tolerant 

Cotton (Event T303-3)

 In a notice published in the Federal Register on 

October 12, 2011 APHIS announced its determination 

of nonregulated status of TwinLink ® cotton (genetic 

events T304-40 and GHB119). In February 2012, 

APHIS received a request from Bayer Crop Sciences 

for an extension of the previous determination of 

nonregulated status of TwinLink ® cotton event T304-

40 to its cotton designated as event T303-3. APHIS 

regulations state that a person may request to extend 

a determination of nonregulated status to other 

organisms based on the similarity of that organism to 

an antecedent organism. In its request, BCS stated 

that this cotton is similar to TwinLink ® cotton (event 

T304-40) and, therefore, should not be a regulated 

article under APHIS’ regulations. 

 In response, APHIS evaluated Bayer Crop 

Science’s request and the supporting data submitted 

and agreed that the two events are similar. APHIS 

completed an environmental assessment (EA) and 

finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the 

extension of the determination of nonregulated status 

to Bayer’s TwinLink ® cotton T303-3. 

Q: Is this APHIS’ first granting of an extension of a 

determination of nonregulated status?

A: No, APHIS has granted extensions of nonregulated 

status before. The last extension for a determination 

of nonregulated status was in 2006 for Bayer 

CropScience’s LLRICE601, a rice genetically 

engineered for tolerance to the herbicide glufosinate. 

Q: How is cotton T303-3 similar to TwinLink®

cotton (events T304-40 and GHB119)?

A: Both cotton events were generated through 

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Both events 

produce the same insecticidal proteins.

Q: What is glufosinate?

A: Glufosinate is an herbicide that controls perennial 

grasses and weeds. It has been used by farmers in 

the United States since 1993.

Q: Cotton T303-3 been field tested in the U.S.?

A: Yes, it has been field tested in the major soybean 

growing regions of the continental United States. All 

field tests were conducted under permits, including 

strict movement controls, granted by USDA APHIS.

United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service • Safeguarding American Agriculture

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
# C_2014448EN.01002001.xml

| 15.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 448/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2014 — Popp and Zech v OHIM — Müller-Boré & Partner (MB)

(Case T-463/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark MB - Earlier Community figurative mark MB&P - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2014/C 448/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Eugen Popp (Munich, Germany) and Stefan M. Zech (Munich) (represented by: C. Rohnke and M. Jacob initially, then M. Jacob and F. Thiering)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Müller-Boré & Partner Patentanwälte (Munich) (represented by: T. Koerl and E. Celenk initially, then K. Kern and B. Maneth, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2012 (Case R 506/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Müller-Boré & Partner Patentanwälte, on the one hand, and Eugen Popp and Stefan M. Zech, on the other hand.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Eugen Popp and Stefan M. Zech to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Eugen Popp and Stefan M. Zech to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.

1

---
806 A.2d 842

#### DIANE MANCINI, PLAINTIFF RESPONDENT/CROSS APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, TEANECK POLICE DEPARTMENT, DONALD GIANNONE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS CHIEF OF THE TEANECK POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND WARREN WHITE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN *283HIS CAPACITY AS CAPTAIN OF THE TEANECK POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS/CROSS-RESPONDENTS.1

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued February 6, 2002

Decided April 2, 2002

Remanded by the Supreme Court September 5, 2002

Resubmitted September 23, 2002

Decided October 2, 2002.

Before Judges BAIME, NEWMAN and AXELRAD.

Resubmitted before Judges NEWMAN and AXELRAD.

*Barry Asen*argued the cause for appellants/cross-respondents *(Epstein, Becker & Green,*attorneys; *Mr. Asen,*of counsel and on the brief).

*Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr.,*argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant *(Edwards & Angelí,*attorneys; *Cathy Fleming*and *Mr. Ruvoldt, Jr.,*of counsel; *Mr. Ruvoldt, Jr.*and *Ms. Fleming,*on the brief).

1

 Fictitiously-named defendants have been eliminated from the caption.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

AXELRAD, J.T.C.

(temporarily assigned).

As directed by the Supreme Court in its summary remand order of September 5, 2002, we have reviewed our decision, reported at 349 *N.J.Super.*527, 794 A.2d 185 (2002), in light of the Court’s decision in *Shepherd v. Hunterdon Developmental Center,*174 *N.J.*1, 803 A.2d 611 (2002).

The principles enunciated by this court in *Shepherd v. Hunterdon Developmental Center,*336 *N.J.Super.*395, 765 A.2d 217 (App.Div.2001), upon which we relied in holding the “continuing violation doctrine” tolled the running of the statute of limitations *284on plaintiffs LAD claim, were affirmed by the Court in *Shepherd, supra,*174 *N.J.*at 7, 803 A.2d 611.

Accordingly, we are satisfied our application of those principles is entirely consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision.

We reaffirm the judgment of the trial court, except as modified in our prior decision.
ADDENDUM TO
                      REORGANIZATION AND STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


This Addendum ("Addendum") to that certain Reorganization and
Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Jones Naughton
Entertainment, Inc. and Auctionomics, Inc. and its shareholders
("Agreement") dated June 10, 1999 is executed effective this 25th
day of June, 1999.

Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as in
the Agreement.

1.  As an additional term of the Agreement, the Parties hereby
agree as follows:

JNNE and the Shareholders each agree that, in the event
additional shares of Auction are issued to the
Shareholders, JNNE or any entity controlled by JNNE, then
both JNNE and the Shareholders, or either of them, as the
case may be, will be issued that number of shares, without
consideration, so that the number of shares that each owns
relative to the other shall remain constant on a pari
passu basis.  This anti-dilution provision shall not apply
in the event that shares of Auction are issued to any
party other than the Shareholders, JNNE or any entity
controlled by JNNE, in which event both JNNE and the
Shareholders will experience equal dilution relative to
their respective shareholdings at the time of the
transaction.

The balance of the terms of the Agreement are hereby
acknowledged and agreed to and shall remain in full force and effect.


JONES NAUGHTON ENTERTAINMENT, INC.            AUCTIONOMICS, INC.
a Colorado corporation ("JNNE")               a Nevada corporation ("AUCTION")

/s/ Joe Naughton
By: Joe Naughton                              By: /s/Harvey A. Turell
Its: President and CEO                        Its:





/s/ Harvey A. Turell                           /s/ Nathan Wolfstein
Harvey A. Turell, an individual                Nathan Wolfstein, an individual
EXHIBIT 32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Nebraska Book Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark W.
Oppegard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.



                                            /s/  Mark W. Oppegard
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Mark W. Oppegard
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            June 29, 2005
## **Exhibit99.1**

## **DatalinkCorporation**

**8170 Upland Circle**

# **Chanhassen,Minnesota  55317**

 

March 25, 2002

 

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

                Representations byArthur Andersen LLP

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to the GeneralInstructions as to Financial Statements of the Commission, we confirm to youthat on March 25, 2002, our independent accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP,represented to us that their audit of our financial statements and schedulesreported upon by them in this Report on Form 10-K was subject to Andersen’squality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to providereasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance withprofessional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersenpersonnel working on audits, availability of national office consultation andavailability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct therelevant portions of the audit.

 

We have conducted no independent investigation norobtained any independent verification of Andersen’s representations and by thisletter accept no responsibility for their accuracy.

 

| Very truly yours,                           |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                        |
|                                        |
|                                        |
| /s/                                         | daniel j. kinsella |   |
| Daniel J. Kinsella, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-120213) pertaining to the Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option Plan and the Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated February 14, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of Radiation Therapy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Tampa, Florida 

February 14, 2005
I 

-

` 

!. 

v 'I r 

7 f: ~.
# C_2012287EN.01002402.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/24

---

Action brought on 10 July 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-332/12)

2012/C 287/45

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Hetsch, L. Nicolae and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2009/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending Council Directive 1999/35/EC and Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of such provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 25 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2009/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending Council Directive 1999/35/EC and Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of such provisions, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 25 of that directive;

1

| — | impose on the Republic of Poland, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a penalty payment for failure to comply with the obligation to notify measures transposing Directive 2009/18, at a daily rate of EUR 56 095,20 and payable from the date on which judgment is delivered in the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

impose on the Republic of Poland, in accordance with Article 260(3) TFEU, a penalty payment for failure to comply with the obligation to notify measures transposing Directive 2009/18, at a daily rate of EUR 56 095,20 and payable from the date on which judgment is delivered in the present case;

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of the directive expired on 17 June 2011.

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 131, p. 114.

1

---
# C_2016222EN.01004501.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/45

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 4 may 2016 — Bandieri v Commission

(Case F-91/12) (1)

(2016/C 222/58)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 27/10/2012, p. 33.

---
No. 50752.

#### Protest 446521-G of Draeger Shipping Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of goatskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Jacobson and Kupitsky*v. *United States*(T. D. 47950). In accordance therewith the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1420 was sustained.