alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### H. Z. Bernstein Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6849.

Entry No. 728281.

Invoice dated London, England, November 29, 1945.

Certified December 1, 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 18, 1945.

(Decided February 6, 1947)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Paid Sick Leave Provisions in Major Union Contracts, 1959

              																	Rosenbloom, Henry Samuel. 						*Paid Sick Leave Provisions in Major Union Contracts, 1959 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1282*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										October 1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4557,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
CAUSE NO. 2012-68212

VANESSA ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

§

§

§

IN THE DISTRICT COURT

V. §

§

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

AMERICAN RISK INSURANCE 

COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant.

§

§

§

295TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

 COMES NOW, Vanessa Anderson (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and files this Notice of 

Appeal pursuant to Rule 225 of the Texas Rules of Appellant Procedure, and all other applicable 

provisions thereof. In support of the same, Plaintiff would show unto this Honorable Court as 

follows:

 1. This matter was assigned cause number 2012-68212 in the 295th Judicial District 

Court of Harris County, Texas. 

 2. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s claims and causes against Defendant 

on January 30, 2015.

 3. Plaintiff wishes to appeal all related dismissal of her claim.

 4. Plaintiff is not seeking an accelerated appeal, nor is this a restricted appeal. 

 5. This appeal will be taken to either the First or Fourteenth Circuit Courts of 

Appeal. 

 6. A copy of this notice is being filed with the clerks of both the First or Fourteenth 

Circuit Courts of Appeal pursuant to Rule 25.1e of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

1

ACCEPTED

01-15-00257-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

4/9/2015 4:39:36 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/9/2015 4:39:36 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
 WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff prays that the Court accept this 

Notice of Appeal and grant Plaintiff all relief to which she may be entitled, either at law or in 

equity. 

 Respectfully submitted,

THE VOSS LAW FIRM, P.C.

/s/ Scott G. Hunziker

_________________________

Scott G. Hunziker

State Bar No. 24032446

The Voss Law Center

26619 Interstate 45 South

The Woodlands, Texas 77380

Telephone: (713) 861-0015

Facsimile: (713) 861-0021

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on February 24, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

served on all counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure as follows:

Arfeo Yllana

Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP

One Riverway, Ste. 1400

Houston, Texas 77056

Via Facsimile (713)403-8299

 /s/ Scott G. Hunziker

_____________________________

 SCOTT G. HUNZIKER

3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5763] 

## Closed Meeting 

The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State Department—Overseas Security Advisory Council on June 6, 2007 at the U.S. Secret Service, Washington, DC. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(7)(E), it has been determined that the meeting will be closed to the public. The meeting will focus on an examination of corporate security policies and procedures and will involve extensive discussion of proprietary commercial information that is considered privileged and confidential, as well as discussion of law enforcement investigative techniques and procedures. The agenda will include updated committee reports, a global threat overview, and other matters relating to private sector security policies and protective programs and the protection of U.S. business information overseas. 

For more information, contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security Advisory Council, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, phone: 571-345-2214. 

Dated: May 7, 2007. 

Patrick D. Donovan, 

Acting Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E7-9424 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-50155

Summary Calendar

_____________________

LOUIS SEAN BODWAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CRYSTAL CITY DETENTION CENTER;

JIM GREER, Warden,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-96-CV-31

_________________________________________________________________ September 17, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Louis Sean Bodw ay, Missouri state prisoner #514692, argues

that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. He argues that the

defendants deprived him of ade quate medical care and that the

district court should have allowed him to amend his complaint to

state an actionable claim.1 Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985).

-2- We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of the

Spears 1 hearing, the opinion of the d istrict court, and the

appellant’s brief, and affirm th e dismissal of the complaint as

frivolous substantially for the reasons given by the district court

in support of its ruling. S ee Bodway v. Crystal City D etention

Center , No. DR-96-CV-31 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 1997).

Bodway argues that if he had been given the opportunity to

amend his complaint in the district court, he could have stated an

actionable claim. A p ro se prisoner is entitled to factually

develop his complaint before a proper § 1915(e) determination can

be made. S ee Eason v. Thaler

, 14 F.3d 8, 9-10 (5th Cir. 1994 )

.

Bodway made no reference to the warden during his testimony given

at the Spears hearing. He did not seek in the district court to

amend his complaint to add any other defendants or to add

additional claims against the warden; nor has he argued on appeal

any specific additional facts that he would allege in an amended

complaint if the case was remanded to the district court for

further development. Bodway has failed to demonstrate that the

district court abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint

against Greer as frivolous. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825,

837 (1994).-3-

Bodway has not argued on appeal that his excessive-force claim

a gainst a detention facility guard was improperly dismissed as

frivolous. Thus, the claim is deemed abandoned on appeal. S ee

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner

, 813 F.2d 744, 748

(5th Cir. 1987).

A F F I R M E D.
# C_2013026EN.01007602.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/76

---

Action brought on 16 November 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-140/12)

2013/C 26/159

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: R. Duta, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the refusal to grant the confirmatory application made by the applicant to the Commission for access to several questions asked in the course of the pre-selection procedure for open competition EPSO/AD/230 231/12.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Commission’s decision refusing the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to documents; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision refusing the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to documents;

| — | where necessary and, in particular, in so far as their nature as decisions is established, annul EPSO’s decisions of 20 July 2012 in accordance with which the applicant was refused access to seven of the questions asked in the course of the pre-selection procedure for open competition EPSO/AD 230-231; |
| --- | --- |

—

where necessary and, in particular, in so far as their nature as decisions is established, annul EPSO’s decisions of 20 July 2012 in accordance with which the applicant was refused access to seven of the questions asked in the course of the pre-selection procedure for open competition EPSO/AD 230-231;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>		5
<MULTIPLIER>		1,000,000
<CURRENCY>		British Pounds Sterling
<PERIOD-TYPE>		9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>		Apr-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>		Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>		1.6117
<CASH>				9
<SECURITIES>			16
<RECEIVABLES>			217
<ALLOWANCES>			9
<INVENTORY>			0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>		  277
<PP&E>				1,175
<DEPRECIATION>			  139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>			2,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>		  412
<BONDS>				  964
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>		    0
<PREFERRED>			  166
<COMMON>			  440
<OTHER-SE>			   11
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	2,395
<SALES>				1,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>		1,037
<CGS>				  717
<TOTAL-COSTS>			  717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>		  182
<LOSS-PROVISION>		    4
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		   87
<INCOME-PRETAX>			   47
<INCOME-TAX>			   14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>		   33
<DISCONTINUED>			    8
<EXTRAORDINARY>			    0
<CHANGES>			    0
<NET-INCOME>			   41
<EPS-BASIC>			    0 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>			    0 <F1>
<FN>
<F1>	N/A

</TABLE>
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 586 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. JACOB CHRISTIAN PALMER ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including May 28 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 19 2023

04/19/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0586
Before the Second Division,

October 26, 1942

No. 47667.

#### Protest 7270-K of Kloeckner Steel Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question consists of structural shapes of steel the same as those the subject of *Blum*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 119, C. D. 381), the claim at 34 of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 312 was sustained.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of COMPAÑÍA INTERNACIONAL DE TELECOMUNICACIONES S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Miguel Angel Gutiérrez, Vice Chairman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





By:   /s/    Miguel Angel Gutiérrez

Name: Miguel Angel Gutiérrez

Title: Vice Chairman



April 15, 2003
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Aircraft don’t run on hopes and dreams

By Senior Airman Omari Bernard18th WG Public Affairs

                KADENA AIR BASE, Japan  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Kadena Air Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Kadena Air Base18th Logistics Readiness SquadronfuelrefuelpetroleumPetroleum Oils and LubricantsPOL
**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I, Robert M. Jakobe, certify that:

1.      Ihave reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Sheridan Group, Inc.;

2.      Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)   disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date:  | March 30, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Robert M. Jakobe                                  |   |
|--------|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |           |   | Robert M. Jakobe                                      |
|   |           |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 356 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp should be issued 

to honor law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty and that 

the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2008 

Mr. FILNER (for himself and Mr. ISSA) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a postage stamp 

should be issued to honor law enforcement officers killed 

in the line of duty and that the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory 

Committee should recommend to the Postmaster General 

that such a stamp be issued. 

Whereas more than 17,900 law enforcement officers have lost 

their lives in the line of duty in American communities 

since 1792, when records first started to be kept; 

Whereas 186 law enforcement officers lost their lives in the 

line of duty in American communities in 2007; 

Whereas 870,000 law enforcement officers risk danger to 

their lives and safety each day to serve and protect American communities; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 356 IH 

Whereas America’s law enforcement officers set an example 

of strength, courage, and valor that all Americans can 

admire and learn from; 

Whereas following September 11, 2001, on which day 72 law 

enforcement officers were killed while responding to attacks perpetrated against this Nation, law enforcement 

has taken on the additional responsibility of protecting 

our homeland and the American people from the threat 

of terrorism; and 

Whereas issuing a postage stamp to honor the sacrifices of 

America’s law enforcement officers is proper and fitting: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that— 

3 (1) a postage stamp should be issued to honor 

4 law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty; 

5 and 

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

8 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS