alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Pension Plans Under Collective Bargaining: Late 1958

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Pension Plans Under Collective Bargaining: Late 1958 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1259*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										July 1959,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4542,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Allen D. Goodman, Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Allen D. GoodmanAllen D. GoodmanChief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., General Partner of the PartnershipNovember 16, 2005




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extend that this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



21
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1477 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to prevent the dissemination to the public of certain information with respect 

to noncommercial flights of private aircraft owners and operators. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2011 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to prevent the dissemination to the public of 

certain information with respect to noncommercial flights 

of private aircraft owners and operators. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘BARR Preservation 

5 Act of 2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1477 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISSEMINATION OF CERTAIN PRI2 VATE AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION NUMBERS TO 

3 THE PUBLIC. 

4 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) The Federal Government’s dissemination to 

6 the public of information relating to a noncommer7 cial flight carried out by a private owner or operator 

8 of an aircraft, whether during or following the flight, 

9 does not serve a public policy objective. 

10 (2) Upon the request of a private owner or op11 erator of an aircraft, the Federal Government should 

12 not disseminate to the public information relating to 

13 noncommercial flights carried out by that owner or 

14 operator, as the information should be private and 

15 confidential. 

16 (b) PROHIBITION.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Upon the request of a pri18 vate owner or operator of an aircraft, the Adminis19 trator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall 

20 require that, with respect to the noncommercial 

21 flights of that owner or operator, the display of that 

22 owner or operator’s aircraft registration number is 

23 blocked in aircraft situational display data available 

24 to the public. 

25 (2) AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION TO GOV26 ERNMENT AGENCIES.—Paragraph (1) does not afVerDate Mar 15 2010 03:05 Aug 04, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1477.IS S1477

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1477 IS

1 fect the authority of the Administrator to make air2 craft registration numbers available to Federal, 

3 State, or local government agencies. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### August F. Stauff & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6827.

Entry No. 700823, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, May 31, 1946, etc.

Certified June 3, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 2, 1946, etc.

(Decided January 31, 1947)

*Daniel P. McDonald*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The agreed set of facts, embodied in the stipulation of submission, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. C. S. § 1402 (d)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values of the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
# C_2012217EN.01001101.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale della Spezia (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Simone Gardella v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS)

(Case C-233/12)

2012/C 217/22

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale della Spezia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Simone Gardella

Applicant:

Defendant: Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS)

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Articles 20, 45, 48 and 145 to 147 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Article 15 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFEU) be interpreted as precluding national legislation or national administrative practice which do not permit a worker who is a national of a Member State to transfer to the pension scheme of an international body situated in the territory of another Member State of the European Union, where he works and is insured, the pension contributions credited to the social security scheme of his own State, where he was previously insured? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 20, 45, 48 and 145 to 147 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Article 15 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFEU) be interpreted as precluding national legislation or national administrative practice which do not permit a worker who is a national of a Member State to transfer to the pension scheme of an international body situated in the territory of another Member State of the European Union, where he works and is insured, the pension contributions credited to the social security scheme of his own State, where he was previously insured?

| 2. | As a consequence of the circumstances set out in Question 1, should it be possible to exercise the right to transfer contributions even in the absence of any specific agreement between the Member State of which the worker is a national or the worker’s pension institution, on the one hand, and the international body on the other?’ |
| --- | --- |

2.

As a consequence of the circumstances set out in Question 1, should it be possible to exercise the right to transfer contributions even in the absence of any specific agreement between the Member State of which the worker is a national or the worker’s pension institution, on the one hand, and the international body on the other?’

---
(Reap. Dec. 9461)

#### The American International Products Corporation *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 812473; 799862.

(Decided June 15, 1959)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise the subject of the above entitled appeals to reappraisement is properly dutiable on the basis of American Selling Price as defined in Section 402(g) Tariff Act of 1930 as amended and that the said American Selling Price was as follows for the export periods indicated.

> *Item Export period Price*

> Pas acid 1958 $3.40 per lb. less 1% net packed

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value, at the time of exportation, was $3.40 per pound, less 1 per centum net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Form of Supply Agreement



 Exhibit 10.II.C 
 

 
 SUPPLY AGREEMENT 
 FEED GRADE PHOSPHATES (MONOCAL) 
 PHILIPPINES 
  

			
	DATE:	  	September 12, 2007
		
	SELLER:	  	 MOSAIC FERTILIZER LLC, d.b.a.
 MOSAIC FEED
INGREDIENTS
 8813 HWY 41 SOUTH
 RIVERVIEW, FL
33569

		
	BUYER:	  	 CARGILL, INCORPORATED
 % CARGILL
PHILIPPINES
 GRAIN AND OILSEED CRUSH BUSINESS UNIT
 1257 MAKATI CITY, METRO MANILA
 PHILIPPINES

		
	PRODUCT:	  	MONOCALCIUM PHOSPHATE (MONOCAL)
		
	SPECIFICATIONS:	  	TYPICAL MOSAIC SPECIFICATIONS
		
	MARKET:	  	PHILIPPINES
		
	PERIOD:	  	JUNE 1, 2007 THROUGH MAY 31, 2008
		
	PRICING:	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	QUANTITY:	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	DELIVERY:	  	TO BE NEGOTIATED AT TIME OF PURCHASE
		
	PAYMENT:	  	30 DAYS
		
	TERMS:	  	MOSAIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS TO APPLY. (ATTACHED)

  

									
	 CARGILL, INCORPORATED
	 		 	MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC
					
	By:	 	  
	 		 	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  
	 		 	Name:	 	  

	Its:	 	  
	 		 	Its:
33839.

#### JOHNSON v. JOHNSON.

Bowles, Justice.

This is an appeal by the husband from an order of the Superior Court of Fulton County which granted the wife custody of the two minor children of the marriage and ordered the husband to pay $55 per week, per child for their support, $150 per month to the wife as periodic alimony, and further ordered the husband to pay all outstanding debts incurred during the marriage.

*340Argued September 11, 1978

Decided September 28, 1978

Rehearing denied October 16, 1978.

*Kingloff, Clifford & Travis, J. Stephen Clifford,*for appellant.

*Edward M. Saginar,*for appellee.

On appeal the husband contends that the trial court’s award is excessive as a matter of law "based upon the uncontroverted testimony regarding his financial status and circumstances.”

Although there is no transcript of the evidence adduced at the trial of this case, the record does contain the trial court’s "Findings of Fact” which the court ordered filed as a part of the pleadings in this case and considered in conjunction with the court’s final order and judgment. Without a transcript of the proceedings below, we must assume that the evidence supports the trial court’s "Findings of Fact.” *Ramon v. Ramon,*232 Ga. 97 (205 SE2d 311) (1974). These findings adequately support the trial court’s judgment as to the award of alimony. See *Hardin v. Hardin,*241 Ga. 241 (244 SE2d 868) (1978); *Thornhill v. Thornhill,*237 Ga. 900 (230 SE2d 284) (1976).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 18

- 00650

- CV

Trial Court Cause

Number: 681719

- 0101Z

Style: In re Commitment of Bradley James Manuel

Date motion filed * : July 25, 2019

Type of motion: Motion for En Banc Reconsideration

Party fil ing motion:

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

Absent extraordinary circumsta nces, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

_____________________________________

Judge 's signature: /s / Sherry Radack

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, Lan dau, Hig htower, and

Countiss

.

Good man, J., dissenting from the denial of en banc re consideration

Date: Februar y 13, 2020
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of ComCam International, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Don Gilbreath, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Don Gilbreath

Don Gilbreath

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

May 31, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

27

---
Exhibit 31.1               CERTIFICATIONS

I, Daniel Myers, the Registrant's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Carsunlimited.com, inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment to the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Carsunlimited.com, Inc.,

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. As the sole certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and I have: a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures as of the last
date of the period covered by this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. As the sole certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on my most recent
evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the small business issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal controls; and

6. As the sole certifying officer, I have indicated in this quarterly report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 6, 2006

/s/Daniel Myers
---------------------------
Daniel Myers
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 8, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. NorthStar Banking Corporation; to become a bank holding company 
by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of NorthStar Bank (in 
organization), both of Tampa, Florida.
    2. Southern National Corporation, Andalusia, Alabama; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of People's Community Bank of the West 
Coast, Sarasota, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Tracy Basinger, Director, 
Regional and Community Bank Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. American Heritage Holdings; to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Borrego Springs Bank, 
N.A., both of La Mesa, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 9, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-9229 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
### Court ofAppeals, State ofMichigan 

### ORDER People ofMI v Carvin Levelle Bailey Docket No. 344779 LC No. 17-004518-FC Christopher M. Murray Presiding Judge Patrick M. Meter Kirsten Frank Kelly

Judges The Court orders that the March 17, 2020 opinion is hereby AMENDED to correct a clerical error: removal offootnote 1. 

### In all other respects, the March 17, 2020 opinion remains unchanged. Presiding Judge

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. ZimmerJr., ChiefClerk, on 

## MAR 23 

# 2020 Dale