alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1710 Referred in House (RFH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1710

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2011

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the United States courthouse located at 222 West 7th 
  Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, as the James M. Fitzgerald United States 
                              Courthouse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JAMES M. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse located at 222 West 
7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska, shall be known and designated as the 
``James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``James M. Fitzgerald United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate December 17, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit
        32**
  **CERTIFICATIONS
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
  SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Carsunlimited.com, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey
        Donaldson, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
        and Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  August
        15, 2006


By:
              /s/ Geoffrey
                DonaldsonGeoffrey DonaldsonChief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
No. 46962.

#### Protest 849742-G of Meyer & Lange (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material surrounding the hams.
#### KLEIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT and Dr. Donald R. Collins, Petitioners, v. Robert LETT, Respondent.

No. 96-0424.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 17, 1998.

Christopher V. Bacon, David M. Feldman, Levon G. Hovnatanian, Houston, for Petitioners.

Rob L. Wiley, Austin, Karen L. Fannin, Houston, for Respondent.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The motion for rehearing of the denial of the application for writ of error is overruled. We neither approve nor disapprove of the opinion of the court of appeals. 917 S.W.2d 455.
#### Timothy W. KITE d/b/a Timothy Kite Enterprises v. GUS KAPLAN, INC. and Gustave Kaplan. GUS KAPLAN, INC. v. TIMOTHY KITE ENTERPRISES.

No. 98-C-0715.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Gus Kaplan, Inc.; Kaplan, Gustave;—Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. CA97-0057, CA97-0058; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, Nos. 176,347, 177,-856.

Granted.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States

No. 6838.

Entry No. N-193, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, October 1942, etc.

Certified. October 1942, etc.

Entered at Newark, N. J., November 12, 1942, etc.

(Decided February 5, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King of*counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the value of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values, less additions made by importer on entries because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 50761.

#### Protests 78337-K, etc., of Pistorino & Co., Inc., et al. (Boston and Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. A-700 (74-6089).

#### Escamilla *v.*Bogue, U. S. District Judge.

C. A. 8th Cir. Application for stay of trial, presented to Mr. Justice Marshall, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9843)

#### Kersten Shipping Agency, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 805160.

(Decided November 17, 1960)

*JohnD. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the date of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, poly-proplene resins, manufactured in and export from. Italy to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Italy in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was U.S. $6.80 per 2,000 pounds less 15 per centum less insurance and freight as stated in the invoice for each lot.

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise was appraised under Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved, and that such value was United States $6.80 per 2,000 pounds, less 15 per centum, less insurance and freight, as stated in the invoice for each lot.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
### Adams, Kevin {OST)
From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: 

### Subject:

Richard, Ruby, Scott (CED) <scott.ruby@alaska.gov> Monday, February 04, 2013 2:23 PM Sewell, Richard E(DOT) Adams, Kevin (OST) RE: Diomede

The $200,000 is funded through General funds and is in embedded into ouroperating budget. This means that unless the legislature specifically removed it, itwill continue to be available. The Governor's budget keptthe Division's GF budget at a status quo. Ido not anticipate thatthisfunding will be an issue. Last Thursday, the Department started its budget subcommittee hearings on the House side. The hearings are every Tuesday and Thursday between nowand March 

### 1. Our Division budget will be discussed at one ofthe hearings, but has notyet been scheduled. That is about as much as Ican provide. Scott 

# sco.tt

## 9lufty Director Division of Community and Regional Affairs 550 W 7th Ave., Suite 1640 Anchorage, AK 99501 Work: (907) 269-4569 Email: scott.ruby@alaska.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.35

                           NONRECOURSE PROMISSORY NOTE


 $1,462,240                                                   Reykjavik, Iceland
                                                               15 September 1999

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby unconditionally promises to
pay to the order of deCODE genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), at the Company's principal office or at such other place as the
holder hereof may designate in writing, on 1 November 2003, in lawful money of
the United States of America and in immediately available funds, the total price
of $1,462,240 Dollars, together with interest, compounded annually, from the
date hereof on the unpaid principal at the rate of 6% per annum.

         This Note may not be prepaid.

         The full amount of this Note is secured by a pledge of shares of Common
Stock of the Company, and is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the
Early Exercise Stock Purchase Agreement and the Pledge Agreement, each of even
date herewith between the undersigned and the Company. The Company's recovery
against the undersigned for failure to pay any amount owing hereunder when due
shall be limited solely to the shares of Common Stock or other collateral of the
undersigned pledged to the Company in the Pledge Agreement. The undersigned
shall not be liable or have any personal liability in any other respect for the
payment of any amount due under this Note.

         The undersigned hereby represents and agrees that the amounts due under
this Note are not consumer debt, and are not incurred primarily for personal,
family or household purposes, but are for business and commercial purposes only.

         The undersigned hereby waives presentment, protest and notice of
protest, demand for payment, notice of dishonor and all other notices or demands
in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or endorsement
of this Note.


                                       -1-
<PAGE>   2


         This Note shall be governed by, and construed, enforced and interpreted
in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, excluding conflict of
laws principles that would cause the application of laws of any other
jurisdiction.


                                  /s/     Hannes Smarason
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                            (signature)

                                          Hannes T. Smarason
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                            (print name)



                                       -2-
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1607 

To include shellfish to the list of crops eligible for the noninsured crop 

disaster assistance program and the emergency assistance for livestock 

program of the Department of Agriculture. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2011 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 

Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To include shellfish to the list of crops eligible for the noninsured crop disaster assistance program and the emergency assistance for livestock program of the Department 

of Agriculture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shellfish Equity Act 

5 of 2011’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1607 IS

1 SEC. 2. NONINSURED CROP DISASTER ASSISTANCE PRO2 GRAM. 

3 Section 196(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Agriculture Im4 provement and Reform Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 

5 7333(a)(2)(B)) is amended by inserting ‘‘shellfish (regard6 less of the method of production),’’ after ‘‘sea oats,’’. 

7 SEC. 3. EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOR LIVESTOCK, HONEY 

8 BEES, SHELLFISH, AND FARM-RAISED FISH. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 531(e) of the Federal 

10 Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1531(e)) is amended— 

11 (1) in the subsection heading, by inserting 

12 ‘‘SHELLFISH,’’ after ‘‘HONEY BEES,’’; and 

13 (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘shellfish (re14 gardless of the method of production),’’ after ‘‘honey 

15 bees,’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 901(e) of the Trade 

18 Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2497(e)) is amended— 

19 (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting 

20 ‘‘SHELLFISH,’’ after ‘‘HONEY BEES,’’; and 

21 (B) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘shell22 fish (regardless of the method of production),’’ 

23 after ‘‘honey bees,’’. 

24 (2) FUNDING.—Section 902(d) of the Trade 

25 Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2497a(d)) is amended by 

26 striking ‘‘the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1607 IS

1 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘the Shellfish Equity Act of 

2 2011’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 42067.

#### Protest 985427-G of Bacharach Industrial Instrument Co. (Pittsburgh) .

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

Ardometers similar to those the subject of *Bacharach*v. *United States*(C. D. 149) were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as claimed.
# C_2014223EN.01006701.xml

| 14.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/67

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2014 — Ohrgaard v Commission

(Case F-151/12) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Residence condition laid down in Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Performance of duties in an international organisation - Concept - Work experience period of five months at the Commission - Exclusion))

2014/C 223/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jakob Ohrgaard (Frederiksberg, Denmark) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision refusing the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 6 March 2012 refusing Mr Ohrgaard the benefit of the expatriation allowance, as amended by the decision of 31 August 2012 rejecting the claim; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 6 March 2012 refusing Mr Ohrgaard the benefit of the expatriation allowance, as amended by the decision of 31 August 2012 rejecting the claim;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Ohrgaard. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Ohrgaard.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 23.2.2013, p. 26.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David N. Vander Ploeg, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of School Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 (the Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of School Specialty, Inc.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 1, 2011



/s/    David N. Vander PloegDavid N. Vander PloegExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Annual report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Mannatech, Incorporated



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the
Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Mannatech, Incorporated (the Issuer).



I, Stephen D. Fenstermacher, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 31, 2005



/s/ Stephen D.
Fenstermacher

Stephen D.
Fenstermacher

Chief Financial Officer



Subscribed and sworn to before me

This
31stday of March, 2005



/s/ Christina
Meissner

Name: Christina
Meissner

Title: Notary Public, State of Texas



My commission expires: March 19,
2006



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Mannatech,

Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 29, 2020 No. 04-20-00213-CV CITY OF SAN ANTONIO and Erik Walsh,

Appellants v. SAN ANTONIO PARK POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION , Henry Bassuk and Rogelio Tamez, Appellees From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CI-18334 Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellees’ brief was originally due July 20, 2020. Appellees’ first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to September 18, 2020. On September 25, 2020, appellees filed their brief and a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief until September 25, 2020, for a total extension of sixty-seven days. After consideration, we GRANT the motion. Appellees’ brief is deemed timely filed as of September 25, 2020.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of September, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6112.

Invoice dated Sonneberg, Germany, July 1, 1939.

Certified July 5, 1939.

Entered at Boston, Mass., August 1, 1939.

Entry No. 1280/4.

(Decided March 2, 1945)

*Sharreits*<fc *Hillis (Edward P. Sharretis*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Pavl P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Olivek, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has-been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to *358the item of 10 per centum commission- in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified On the invoice with “xx” in green ink and the initials T. A. McC. of Examiner Timothy A. McCarthy, are in all material resp.ects the, same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraisements 113038-A, 113040-A, and 113468-A of the F. W. Woolworth Co. and passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman & Co., Rice & Co. Corp., Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> It is further stipulated .and agreed, that on the date of exportation of the merchandise involved in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials T. A. McC. of Examiner Timothy A. McCarthy, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary, course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3]4 per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeal is abandoned.

> ' It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in *United States v. S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeal to reappraisement is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked "xx” in green ink and the initials T. A. McC. of Examiner Timothy A. McCarthy, and that such values are the per *se*unit invoice prices, plus *Z){*per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.