alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE 

I, Walter Thomas Price III, a Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that(i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information containedin such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. 

Date: May 11, 2011 

By: /s/ Walter Thomas Price III

Walter Thomas Price III

Managing Member (Principal Executive Officer) 

Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. 

General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# CENTCOM helps DoD logisticians and engineers “sustain the fight, set the theater"

By Lt. Col. Darrick B. LeeU.S. Air Forces Central Command Public Affairs

                AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Air Forces Central Command website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

U.S. Air Forces Central CommandAFCENTU.S. Central CommandCentcomJoint Logistics Coordination Board
No. 74-811.

#### Reeves *v.*Administrator, Federal Energy Office, et al.

Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. Cer-tiorari denied.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43423

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

CODY MILLER WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 598

Filed: July 15, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bonneville County. Hon. Jon J. Shindurling, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of two years, for possession of a controlled substance and being a 

persistent violator, affirmed. 

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. 

Reynolds, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Cody Miller Williams pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-

2732(c)(1), and being a persistent violator, I.C. § 19-2514. In exchange for his guilty plea, 

additional charges were dismissed. At sentencing, the parties stipulated to the imposition of a 

specified sentence. The district court followed the parties’ recommendation and sentenced 

Williams to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. 

Williams appeals.
2

Williams asserts that the district court imposed an excessive sentence. The doctrine of 

invited error applies to estop a party from asserting an error when his or her own conduct induces 

the commission of the error. State v. Atkinson, 124 Idaho 816, 819, 864 P.2d 654, 657 (Ct. App. 

1993). One may not complain of errors one has consented to or acquiesced in. State v. Caudill, 

109 Idaho 222, 226, 706 P.2d 456, 460 (1985); State v. Lee, 131 Idaho 600, 605, 961 P.2d 1203, 

1208 (Ct. App. 1998). In short, invited errors are not reversible. State v. Gittins, 129 Idaho 54, 

58, 921 P.2d 754, 758 (Ct. App. 1996). This doctrine applies to sentencing decisions as well as 

rulings made during trial. State v. Griffith, 110 Idaho 613, 614, 716 P.2d 1385, 1386 (Ct. App. 

1986). 

Therefore, because Williams received the sentence he requested, he may not complain 

that the district court abused its discretion. Accordingly, Williams’s judgment of conviction and 

unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for 

possession of a controlled substance and being a persistent violator is affirmed.
No. 42071.

#### Protest 985454-G of James St. L. O’Toole (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

There was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff when this case was called for trial. On the record presented the protest was overruled.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.7

Schedule to Stock Option Agreement under the Company's Stock Incentive Plan.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Option Holder                        Number of Shares              Exercise Price                Date of Grant


<S>                                  <C>                           <C>                         <C>
David Dean                                 6,000                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000

George M. Dickens, Jr.                    34,000                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000

R. S. Evans                              100,000                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000

Daniel J. Geller                          20,000                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000

Clifford T. Gordon                        15,500                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000

Barry J. Kulpa                           326,000                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000

Gregory D. Lambert                        65,000                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000

Carl A. Liliequist                        39,000                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000

Paul W. Lyle                              34,000                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000

Stokes Ritchie                            21,000                   $4.29 per share             January 24, 2000
</TABLE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Changes in Women's Occupations, 1940-1950

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Pidgeon, Mary Elizabeth. 						*Changes in Women's Occupations, 1940-1950 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 253*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1954,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5526,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1681 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1681

         To assure that Congress acts on the budget resolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 11, 2011

Mr. Cardin (for himself and Ms. Ayotte) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To assure that Congress acts on the budget resolution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL ACTION ON A BUDGET RESOLUTION.

    Section 303 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by--
            (1) striking subsection (a) and inserting the following: 
        ``After April 15 and unless the concurrent resolution on the 
        budget for a fiscal year has been adopted for the budget year, 
        it shall not be in order in the House of Representatives or the 
        Senate to consider any bill or joint resolution, amendment or 
        motion thereto, or conference report thereon. This section may 
        be waived or suspended for an emergency by a vote of three-
        fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn.'';
            (2) striking subsections (b) and (c); and
            (3) by striking its section heading and inserting the 
        following new section heading: ``consideration of legislation 
        before budget is adopted''.
                                 <all>
```
### \0 , s UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 7o REGION I 0 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 .`\ ► '/. = Seattle, WA 98101-3140 o PRO1 EG OFFICE or ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT January 22, 2013

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Clarification of Tacoma-Pierce County PM 2,5 Nonattainment Area Emission

Inventory Scope and Boundary FROM: Jeff Hunt, Tacoma-Pierce County Nonattainment Area PM 2.5 Lea
TO: Debra Suzuki, Air Planning Unit Manager I reviewed the emissions inventory submitted as part of the November 28, 2012 State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to address the Tacoma-Pierce County fine particulate nonattainment area. This emissions inventory was submitted to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA) section 172(c)(3) statutory requirements to "include a comprehensive, accurate, current inventory of actual emissions from all sources of the relevant pollutant or pollutants in such area, including such periodic revisions as the Administrator may determine necessary to assure that the requirements of this part'are met." As part of the ongoing technical cooperation between the Puyallup Tribe, Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Washington Department of Ecology, and EPA Region 10, I have confirmed that the inventory reflects emission sources throughout the entire nonattairunent area, including Tribal land, Upon EPA's final approval of the November 28, 2012 SIP revision, the CAA 172(c)(3) requirements will be fully satisfied for the entire nonattainment area, including the Tribal trust land.
No. 50748.

#### Protests 78274-K, etc., of Barton *&*Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2012355EN.01001102.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Kammarrätten i Stockholm, Migrationsöverdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 17 September 2012 — Flora May Reyes v Migrationsverket

(Case C-423/12)

2012/C 355/19

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Kammarrätten i Stockholm, Migrationsöverdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Flora May Reyes

Applicant:

Defendant: Migrationsverket

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Article 2(2)(c) of Directive 2004/38 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a Member State, on certain conditions, can require a direct descendant who is 21 years old or older — in order to be regarded as dependent and thus come within the definition of a family member under Article 2(2)(c) of Directive 2004/38 — to have tried to obtain employment, help with supporting himself from the authorities of his country of origin and/or otherwise support himself but that that has not been possible? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Article 2(2)(c) of Directive 2004/38 (1) be interpreted as meaning that a Member State, on certain conditions, can require a direct descendant who is 21 years old or older — in order to be regarded as dependent and thus come within the definition of a family member under Article 2(2)(c) of Directive 2004/38 — to have tried to obtain employment, help with supporting himself from the authorities of his country of origin and/or otherwise support himself but that that has not been possible?

1

| 2. | In interpreting the term ‘dependent’ in Article 2(2)(c) of Directive 2004/38, does any significance attach to the fact that a relative — due to personal circumstances such as age, education and health — is deemed to be well placed to obtain employment and in addition intends to start work in the Member State, which would mean that the conditions for him to be regarded as a relative who is a dependant under the provision are no longer met? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In interpreting the term ‘dependent’ in Article 2(2)(c) of Directive 2004/38, does any significance attach to the fact that a relative — due to personal circumstances such as age, education and health — is deemed to be well placed to obtain employment and in addition intends to start work in the Member State, which would mean that the conditions for him to be regarded as a relative who is a dependant under the provision are no longer met?

---

(1)  Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77).

1

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 386 

Recognizing and celebrating the 232nd anniversary of the signing of the 

Declaration of Independence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2008 

Mr. SALI submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and celebrating the 232nd anniversary of the 

signing of the Declaration of Independence. 

Whereas the text of the Declaration of Independence was 

adopted by the Second Continental Congress on July 4, 

1776, and the engrossed copy of the Declaration of Independence was signed by most of the delegates in the Second Continental Congress on August 2, 1776; 

Whereas August 2, 2008, marks the 232d anniversary of the 

signing of the engrossed copy of the Declaration of Independence; 

Whereas the signing of the Declaration of Independence 

marked the formal dissolution of the ties of the thirteen 

American colonies with Great Britain, the beginning of 

their statehood and national identity, and the dawning of 

a new era of freedom in America and the world; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 386 IH 

Whereas these Founding Fathers, relying on the direction 

from and protection of Divine Providence, pledged to 

each other their lives, their fortunes, and their Sacred 

honor in defense of this action; 

Whereas the Declaration of Independence paved the way for 

the birth of the Republic; 

Whereas the Declaration of Independence has become part of 

the national culture, and its principles are part of the 

consciousness of all Americans; 

Whereas the fundamental genius of the United States is embodied in the Declaration’s recognition that ‘‘all men are 

created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator 

with certain unalienable rights, that among these are 

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness’’; 

Whereas the principle that the rights of man are bestowed by 

the Creator and are unalienable was derived from Scripture, which antedates the existence from any government; 

Whereas the Declaration of Independence affirms that governments are instituted to protect those rights; and 

Whereas the Declaration acknowledged these self-evident 

Truths, which constituted one of the most revolutionary 

philosophical developments in history and began an unparalleled national experiment: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress recognizes and celebrates 

3 the 232d anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of 

4 Independence. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
No. 46439.

#### Protest 517006-G of Chiteman, Cooperman & Miller (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation- of counsel that the dogskins in question are undressed, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Brachman*v. *United Status*(5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
No. 65752.

#### Distilled Brands, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/23026, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David M. Barnes, CFO and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                           CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.

                           By: /s/ David M. Barnes
                               -----------------------------
                               David M. Barnes
                               Chief Financial Officer and
                               Principal Financial and
                               Accounting Officer

                               February 7, 2007


                                       43
September 15, 2011

Mr. Gerardo Rios Chief, Permits Office USEPA Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

Subject: Pio Pico Energy Center Repackaged Application for a Preven tion of Significant Deterioration Permit

Dear Mr. Rios:

As requested by EPA in a telephone conversation on August 9, 2011, we are submitting on behalf of Pio Pico Energy Center, LLC a re packaged version of the application filed on April 1, 2011 for a PSD permit for the proposed Pio Pico Energy Center (PPEC). This repackaged application has been revised, as requested by EPA, to delete certain portions of the application which were not relevant to EPA’s review of the PSD permit application

for PPEC.

PSD modeling data files are provided as el ectronic files on media accompanying this

submittal.

As requested by EPA, this repackaged appl ication also contains information that demonstrates that that PPEC has no potential for a significant adverse impact to any threatened or endangered species as a result of nitrogen deposition.

The generating facility will include three General Electri c (GE) LMS100 natural gasfired combustion turbine generators (CTGs), each equipped with water injection to the combustors for reducing production of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system with 19 percent aqueous ammonia (NH 3 ) injection to further reduce NOx emissions, and an oxidation cat alyst to reduce carbon monoxide (CO) emissions. The total net generating capacity would be approximately 300 MW. The new emitting units will be installed on a 9.9 acre parcel in the southeast quadrant of the

intersection of Alta Road and Calzada De La Fuente Road, adjacent to the Otay Mesa Energy Center. The Project will be a new major source under the federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program because it will have the potential to emit more than 100,000 TPY of greenhouse gases (GHGs ), a federally regulated pollutant. 

## sierra research

1801 J Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Tel: (916) 444-6666 Fax: (916) 444-8373

Ann Arbor, MI Tel: (734) 761-6666 Fax: (734) 761-6755Gerardo Rios -2- September 15, 2011

The applicant’s contact information is:

Gary Chandler President, Pio Pico Energy Center, LLC

P.O. Box 95592 2542 Singletree Lane South Jordan, UT 84095

If you have any questions regarding this application, please cont act the applicant’s representative David Jenkins at (317) 431-1004 , or Gary Rubenstein or me at (916) 444-

6666.

Sincerely,

Steve Hill

enclosures

cc: (w/o enclosure) John McKinsey, Stoel Rives LLP David Jenkins, Apex Power Group
Steve Moore, SDAPCD