alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of E-City Software, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William C.
Robinson, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


     William C. Robinson
     -------------------
     /s/

     Name: William C. Robinson
     Title: Chief Executive Officer
     Date: August 14, 2003


A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise adopting the  signature
that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
ICP Solar Technologies Inc.: Exhibit 4.1 - Prepared by TNT Filings Inc.




       




Exhibit 4.1


ICP SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 

7075 Place Robert-Joncas Montreal,
Quebec 

H4M 2Z2, Canada 

(514)270-5770 


NOTICE EXTENDING 

COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANTS 

To the holders of our common stock purchase warrants: 

On January 11, 2008, the board of directors of ICP Solar
Technologies Inc., authorized the extension of the expiration date of the common
stock purchase warrants described below by six months from the expiration date
of 5:00 PM PST on January 11, 2008 to 5:00 PM PST on
July 11, 2008. This extension of
the expiration date will apply to all of the warrants issued pursuant to, and
subject to the terms and conditions of, those certain Subscription Agreements
with the Company dated July 11, 2006. 

January 11, 2008 

By ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, 

ICP SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 

By: /s/ Sass Peress                                                  


            
Sass Peress 

            
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Carsunlimited.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Daniel Myers, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


November 14, 2005

                             By: /s/ Daniel Myers
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Norberto LEON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-50154.

D.C. No. CR-03-00604-SJO-01.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 15, 2005.

Daniel A. Saunders, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Elizabeth A. Newman, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Norberto Leon appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea *842conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826(a) & (b)(2).

Leon contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights in making an upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) for a crime of violence. This contention is foreclosed by this court’s case law. *See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez,*419 F.3d 906, 914-15 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005) (explaining that a district judge’s enhancement of a sentence, based on the fact of a prior conviction under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, does not raise any Sixth Amendment problems).

Because Leon was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to *United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). *See Moreno-Hernandez*at 915-16 (extending *Ameline’s*limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional *Booker*error).1

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. On remand the district court should also correct the judgment to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). *See United States v. Herrera-Blanco,*232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000).
exv4w1



 








EXHIBIT 4.1




Independent Auditors’ Consent




The Board of Directors

TSX Group Inc.




     We consent to the use of our audit report dated January 29, 2007 on the consolidated balance sheets
of TSX Group Inc. as at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated statements of income,
changes in shareholders’equity and cash flows for the years then ended incorporated by reference in
the Registration Statement on Form F-8 of TSX Group Inc. dated January 14, 2008 and to the
reference to our firm under the heading “Interests of Experts” included therein.



/s/  KPMG
LLP

Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants




Toronto, Canada

January 14, 2008
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of A.W.S., Jr., a child. )

)

)

A.S., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1254

)

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM )

PROGRAM, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed July 25, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Robert Branning, Judge.

Toni A. Butler of Alderuccio & Butler, 

Naples, for Appellant. 

Meredith K. Hall, Bradenton, for Appellee 

Department of Children and Families. 

Laura J. Lee, Tallahassee, for Appellee 

Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
# C_2013046EN.01001301.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 9 November 2012 — Bloomsbury NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-510/12)

2013/C 46/23

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bloomsbury NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Should Article 2.3-4-5 of the Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54 (3) (g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, (1) be interpreted as meaning that, in a case where a company acquires an important asset free of charge and there is therefore no purchase value which it can enter in the accounts, with the result that a misleading impression is created of the company’s assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss, the important asset in question acquired free of charge should nevertheless be entered in the accounts at its true value?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1978 L 222, p. 11.

1

---
# C_2013038EN.01003302.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/33

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 8 November 2012 — Dekker v Europol

(Case F-69/12) (1)

1

2013/C 38/65

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 20.10.2012, p. 17.

1

---
No. 46418.

#### Protests 799762-G, etc., of Bushwick Produce Exchange et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the .court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

**ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE**

Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Mannatech,Incorporated 

Coppell, Texas 

The auditreferred to in our report dated March 14, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Mannatech, Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company), which is contained in Item 15(a)(1) of this Form 10-K, also included the audit ofthe financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statementschedule based on our audit. 

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidatedfinancial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

March 14, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1639 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1639

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 36, United States Code, to authorize the American Legion 
  under its Federal charter to provide guidance and leadership to the 
 individual departments and posts of the American Legion, and for other 
                                purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL POWER OF AMERICAN LEGION UNDER FEDERAL CHARTER.
    Section 21704 of title 36, United States Code, is amended--
        (1) by redesignating paragraph (5) through (8) as paragraphs 
    (6) through (9), respectively; and
        (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new 
    paragraph (5):
        ``(5) provide guidance and leadership to organizations and 
    local chapters established under paragraph (4), but may not control 
    or otherwise influence the specific activities and conduct of such 
    organizations and local chapters;''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE 

I, Allen D. Goodman, a Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) theQuarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in suchQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. 

Date:May 11, 2011 

By: /s/ Allen D. Goodman

Allen D. Goodman 

Managing Member (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. 

General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001054538
<NAME> GLB Bancorp, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       5,924,520
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          48,037
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            14,506,895
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,732,250
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,000,233
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,984,688
<LOANS>                                     87,412,502
<ALLOWANCE>                                    625,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,073,676
<DEPOSITS>                                  82,144,663
<SHORT-TERM>                                10,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            800,208
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,334,765
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,294,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             119,073,676
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,302,547
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              255,292
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,002,537
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,560,376
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,325,702
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,939,337
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,621,039
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  151,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,993,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,157,535
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,157,535
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   711,241
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.42
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    63,875
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               482,418
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   26,469
<RECOVERIES>                                    18,422
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              625,371
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           625,371
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

September 22, 1943

No. 48796.

#### Protest 10329-K of Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Several witnesses were called by the plaintiff but the evidence was found insufficient to show that the merchandise is not wire rope. It also appeared that said merchandise is excluded from the proviso to paragraph 1604. The appraiser made no special report and the collector gave no information concerning his classification, but upon the invoice appeared the words “wire' rope” in red ink and, following *United States*v. *Bullocks*(24 C. C. P. A. 41 and 25 id. 381), it was assumed that the words in red ink were written by the examiner . of merchandise and that it is the collector’s classification. On the record presented all claims of the plaintiff were overruled.
Exhibit 32

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Advanced  Technologies  Group,  Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated: Octboer 24, 2003                     By: /s/ Abel Raskas
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Abel Raskas
                                               President


Dated: October 24, 2003                     By: /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Alex Stelmak
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

March 20, 1942

No. 47015.

#### Protest 26115-K of Pitman Publishing Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Plaintiff claims- that the terms notebooks and blank books are synonymous and that unless the exception “notebooks” in the said trade agreement is given a restricted meaning it would destroy that to which it is attached. The testimony showed that the books in question are used by court reporters and that they are sold to court reporters and to various governmental agencies for court reporting purposes. The witness admitted that the product of the stenographer or reporter is “notes” and that the stenographic characters designate words and phrases. This witness offered a price catalog, which was received in evidence, on which are listed “Fono notebooks and loose leaf notepaper,” and he stated that the catalog refers to these books as notebooks “because everyone speaks of shorthand as notes.” From the dictionary definitions the court found that the term blank book is broader than the term notebook, which latter, the court stated, is simply a particular kind of blank book, and that the said provision of the trade agreement clearly indicated it was so understood by the negotiators of the said agreement. From the testimony produced and the dictionary definitions the court overruled the protest.
No. 96-1140.

#### Tarapacki *v.*New Jersey ReInsurance Co.

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc.
of Nevada;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                              /s/ Donald R. Mayer
Date: August 5, 2005          ___________________________________________
                              Donald R. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer
No. 45263.

#### Protests 14129-K, etc., of Peat Import Corp. et al. (Mobile, etc.).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.