alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-24-00041-CV

__________________

TERRY HOYT, DOWELL ARMORY, LLC, AND JAMES MICHAEL 

DOWELL, AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF KEVEN 

DOWELL, Appellants

V.

SHOOTER’S STATION ARMS, INC., Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20-03-03005-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Terry Hoyt, Dowell Armory, LLC, and James Michael Dowell, as 

Independent Executor of The Estate of Keven Dowell, Appellants, filed unopposed 

motions to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). They filed the motion 

before the appellate court issued a decision in the appeal. We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal.
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 7, 2024

Opinion Delivered August 8, 2024

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Before the First Division,

May 23, 1950

No. 54343.

#### Bourjois, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 142848-K (New York).

*468Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that case No. 498 was not imported. The claim for allowance of the duties assessed thereon was therefore sustained.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# I am DLA

By DLA Public Affairs

 

 

**My name is:**Kyu Sok Kwak**I am:**A supply planner for DLA Energy Pacific at Korea.**Describe your job in a sentence:**I coordinate fuel inventory levels at 22 defense fuel support points, monitor control limits and manage Korea’s Fuel Exchange Agreement and Replacement-in-Kind program.**How long have you worked at DLA?**I began working for U.S. Forces Korea in 1979 and then transferred to DLA in 2003.**What is your favorite thing about working for DLA?**I love working for the same goal with fun people from different countries. They challenge me and encourage me, and they bring cookies when they visit.**What are your best memories of working here?**I have so many good memories from DLA Energy, but my best are from overnight temporary duty trips, when we had a chance to speak with open minds and really get to know each other.**How do you make a difference?**I make a difference by focusing on the two C’s: concentrating on things within my control and being considerate of others.

 

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

LoglinesLoglines 2017 May
### Reg ul a tory Eva lu a ti o n

Docket No. 

### FAA

- D irectorate Identifier: 

### -AD



### l(vou make changes to the values in the table below. you IIIllS! 

### ensu re the totals update accordingly. 

## fl They do not, chck (or 

### Tah) i nto and then out <)flhe c hanged c.:e/1

. Estimated Costs : Action Costs per Prod uct (e.g., aircraft, engine , (e.g. , Inspection , propeller , appliance) Work-hours Labor Part s Cost Tota l Costs Number of Tota l Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + 

### u.s . for U
. S

. F l eet Do n o t includ e onco ndition cos ts h e re access , testing , (@$85 /h parts) Regis te re d and close-up) our) Pro du cts 

### Inspect Option I 33.5 48 Inspect Option II 148

. 0 

## ·: 48 t' (If 1; 

## on 'I ,l(t { 01 (l (}I) I )() f) (l(j ' I() {' {l ( }(, ' I ( (1( (/ (l(l iii ll!i I I dO ;, I) 01 i (J 00 

# r. .) ()(}( () ')0 I(, (J 01 0 ,tl} • (1(1 () rH 1) 1 ll

'H I '• 

### c { ,I { l ' I) '•( ') ' I I IJ II( • l, )I, 

# ,, u.\ •l ,_l t,.. (! ,_I:J ) 

## ''··- lt I { 

## ,, I

- ( ,_.

The known number of prod u cts in co m p liance: Tota l Costs of comp liance for 

### U.S

. fleet: $740 , 520 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if 

### known) $
On-Condit ion Costs:

# ~ Action Work

- hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection , (include access, ( @$ 85 /ho ur)

replacement) testing , and c l ose up) 

### If cracks are found , additional hours & 4 , 000.0 $26 , 000 

### parts costs could occur. (max shown)

... I• 

### ' l••' \ I 

### 8

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use thisfield to exp lain an ything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obv ious. Thisfield can also be used to exp lain warranty costs): 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "s ignificant regulatory

# action"?**~** YES* 

# D NO 

### [gJ *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES* 

# D NO 

# IZI *Ex planation : 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of s mall entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer.

# ~ YES 

# D NO 

# IZI Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. ls it appropriate to include specific re quirement s for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransp011ation?

# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

# IZI *Exp lanation :

9
(Reap. Dec. 9380)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 3808-H; 5976-H.

*591(Decided April 7, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson fox*the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The above-enumerated appeals for reappraisement relate to plywood, exported from Finland in 1955 and 1956, and were submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties limited to tbe items marked with, the letter “A” and checked SW by Examiner Shelby L. White, and as to which the merchandise was advanced in value and appraised on the basis of home market value.

On the agreed facts as to such merchandise, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the said items of merchandise, and that such value, in each instance was the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum, packed.

As to all items of merchandise where appraisement was made on the basis of the entered invoice unit values, the said appeals having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Before the First Division,

May 9, 1950

No. 54316.

#### The J. D. Richardson Company *v.*United States,

protest 138202-K (Detroit).

*454Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon waste similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Royal Manufacturing Company*(37 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 425), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Order entered August 7 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01355
- CR L.D. MILLER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. F11
- 27250
- Y



### O RDER The reporter’s record was originally due in this appeal on December 7, 2014. This Court has granted court reporter Sharon Hazlewood a thirty

- day extension of time to file the record. On June 9, 2015, the Court ordered court repo rters Melva Key and Sharon Hazlewood to file the reporter’s record by July 15, 2015. On July 15, 2015, Ms. Key filed the portions of the record she had recorded. She also filed a letter stating that Volume 2, which contains voir dire, was not being filed because Ms. Hazlewood had not provided her that volume to include with the record. To date, Ms. Hazlewood has neither filed Volume 2 containing voir dire nor communicated with the Court regarding the status of that record. The appeal cannot proceed unti l the reporter’s record is complete.Accordingly, we ORDER Sharon Hazlewood, former official court reporter of the

Criminal District Court No. 7, to file, by AUGUST 20, 2015 , the reporter’s record of the April 14, 2014 pretrial hearing. FAILURE OF SHARON HAZLEWOOD, FORMER OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER OF THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 7, TO FILE THE SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF THE APRIL 14, 2014 PRETRIAL HEARING BY THE DATE HEREIN SET FORTH MAY RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND/OR A JUDGMENT OF CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CONTEMPT.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Elizabeth Frizell, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; Sharon Hazlewood, former official court reporter, Criminal District Court No. 7; Vearneas Faggett, official court reporter, Criminal District Court No. 7; the Texas Court Reporter’s Certification Board; and to counsel for all parties.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
VOC RACT rules 

Hoffman, Barbara to : Robert Mcconnell 05/17/2010 01 :43 PM 

Cc: "McManus, Karla", "Nixon, Liz" 

History: This message has been replied to . 

Hi Bob, 

Attached is the current draft of our VOC RACT rule, Env-A 1204, for your review . We are trying 

to accomplish 3 things with this rule : 

1) Readopt it before it expires on 12/31 /10; 

2) Change it from a Part to a Chapter because of its length ; and 

3) Incorporate requirements to implement 9 of the 11 CTGs in Groups II, III, and IV. 

Regarding item 1, state law provides that administrative rules expire 8 years after adoption 

unless readopted prior to the expiration date. 

Regarding item 2, this is basically a renumbering exercise. It also allows us to collect all of the 

definitions at the beginning of the chapter. Let us know if you think that's a good or bad idea . 

Regarding item 3, the only CTGs we are not proposing rules for are Large Appliance Coatings 

and Automobile and Light Duty Truck Assembly Coatings. We will be submitting a negative 

declaration for both of those categories . 

Please note that all language proposed for deletion is struck through, and all new language is in 

bold italics. The only new language not associated with the 9 CTGs is found in Env-A 

1203 .04(d) & (e) relating to RACT order procedures. Almost everything else in bold italics is 

CTG-driven . This rule has not yet been discussed with stakeholders nor has it gone to our Air 

Resources Council for review . We would appreciate your input first . We do hope to have a 

stakeholder meeting in the second half of June, and from there begin the formal rulemaking 

process, which includes a public hearing and comment period . 

Please contact either Karla (karia.mcmanusCa)_des.nh .aov), Liz ( elizabeth .nixon c('~.des.nh.gov) or 

me if you need additional information. We would really appreciate receiving your initial 

comments by June 7 so that we can prepare a draft for distribution prior to the stakeholder 

meeting. Thanks Bob! 

Barbara L. Hoffman 

Compliance & Enforcement Programs Manager 

NH Dept. of Environmental Services, Air Resources Div . 

P .O. 'Box 95 

29 Hazen Drive 

Concord, NH 03302-0095 

Tel : (603)271-7874 

FAX: (603)271-7053
Page 1 of 2

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 13-0795

CITY OF DALLAS, PETITIONER

V.

TCI WEST END, INC., RESPONDENT

No. 06-04868-H in the 160th District Court, Dallas County

BILL OF COSTS

Petition for Review

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Miscellaneous Motion

Miscellaneous Motion

Miscellaneous Motion

Miscellaneous Motion

Miscellaneous Motion

Petition for Review Filed

M/E/T to file Petition

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$145.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$145.00

$10.00

Paid by City of Dallas

Paid by TCI West End, Inc.

Paid by City of Dallas

Paid by City of Dallas

Paid by TCI West End, Inc.

Paid by City of Dallas

Paid by City of Dallas

Clerk’s Record Unknown Unknown 8 Volumes

Reporter’s Record $7,040.00 Unknown 12 Volumes

Balance of costs owing to the Supreme Court of Texas: 0.00

The City of Dallas shall recover, and TCI West End, Inc., shall pay, the costs

incurred in this Court.

FILE COPY
Page 2 of 2

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby

certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of the Supreme

Court of Texas, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as

the same appears of record in this office.

with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Austin,

this the 18th day of June, 2015.

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 308 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 308

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2008

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL 
              SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution referred to as the ``sponsor'') 
shall be permitted to

              

 sponsor a public event, the 27th annual National Peace Officers' 
Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the ``event''), on 
the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the law enforcement officers who 
died in the line of duty during 2007.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2008, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 39141.

#### Protests 841006-G, etc., of Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel book ends and fire screens chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were, held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. Book ends plated with silver were held dutiable at 50 percent under the same paragraph. *United States*v. *Friedlaender*(21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445) and *Dow*v. *United States*(id. 282, T. D. 46816) cited.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted),Edward A. Keible, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Endwave Corporation (the “Company”), and JulianneM. Biagini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of theirknowledge:     **1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the ***“Quarterly Report”***) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and     **2. **The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     **In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 11th day ofAugust, 2005.   /s/ Edward A. Keible, Jr. /s/ Julianne M. Biagini   Edward A. Keible, Jr. Julianne M. BiaginiChief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
(Reap. Dec. 9042)

#### Candles by De Angelis *v.*United States

Entry No. 775935.

(Decided January 3, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

*642Oliveb, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to five cases of candles that were exported from Germany and entered at the port of New York.

The case is before me on an oral stipulation of submission wherein the parties have agreed that “the proper dutiable value of all of the merchandise as invoiced is correct,” less $1,024.03, which amount was inadvertently included in the total entered value.

On the agreed facts, I hold the proper dutiable value of all of the items in question to be $1,376.17. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### F. B. Vandegrift & Co., a/c Sears, Roebuck & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7721.

Entry Nos. 2050; 2089; 3493.

*259(Decided July 27, 1949)

*James W. Bevans*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 7624, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised values of the merchandise involved in the cases enumerated in the attached schedule, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases, are equal to the prices,, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets' of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
### Preliminary report on the geology and ground-water resources of the Matanuska Valley agricultural area, Alaska

By: Frank W. Trainer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir268

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.