alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9355]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OA07-21-000]


Attala Transmission LLC; Notice of Filing

May 9, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 25, 2007, Attala Transmission LLC filed a 
letter to inform the Commission that it will not file revisions to its 
pro forma Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) because it has been 
granted a waiver of the requirement to file a OATT until it receives a 
request for service from an entity other than Entergy Mississippi, 
Inc., pursuant to Commission's Order No. 890.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcfaf9eefff3d2d0d5d2d9efc9ccccd3cec8fcdad9cedf92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b7d7e697874555752555e684e4b4b54494f7b5d5e4958155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time May 30, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9355 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2431

_____________________________

ANTHONY HOOD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County.

Russell S. Roberts, Judge.

December 1, 2023

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

BILBREY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Anthony Hood, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16378-16379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6818]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Mexico Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the New Mexico Advisory Committee to the Commission will be held at the 
Albuquerque Hispano Chamber of Commerce, Lockheed Martin Board Room, 
1309 Fourth Street, SW., Albuquerque, NM 87102 and will convene at 2 
p.m. on Tuesday, March 31, 2011. The purpose of the meeting is for the 
committee to discuss recent Commission and regional activities, discuss 
current civil rights issues in the state and plan future activities. 
The Committee will also be briefed by a representative yet to be 
determined.

[[Page 16379]]

    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by April 31, 2011. The 
address is Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 999--18th Street, Suite 
1380S, Denver, CO 80202. Comments may be e-mailed to ebohor@usccr.gov. 
Records generated by this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at 
the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office 
at the above e-mail or street address.
    Deaf or hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and 
require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, March 17, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-6818 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Pam Strunk, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AES Red Oak, LLC (the“registrant”);

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 9, 2004 |                          |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                       |  /s/ Pam Strunk          |
|                       |  Pam Strunk              |
|                       |  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
No. 46438.

#### Protests 487019-G, etc., of S. Segerman (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the dogskins in question are undressed, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Brachman*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
#### In re James L. ADAMS.

No. 99-B-1012.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 16, 1999.

ORDER

Considering the Motion for Interim Suspension filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel:

*629IT IS ORDERED that respondent, James L. Adams, attorney at law, be suspended from the practice of law on an interim basis pursuant to Rule XIX, § 19, pending further orders of this court. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to institute necessary disciplinary proceedings in accordance with Rule XIX, § 11 and § 19.

/s/ Chet D. Traylor

Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
**Exhibit 10.1**

----

|        |   |                                                                                                                        |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |        |                                                                                                                             |
|   |   | **PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**1 Embankment PlaceLondon WC2N 6RHTelephone +44 (0) 20 7583 5000Facsimile +44 (0) 20 7822 4652 |

 

The DirectorsReuters Group PLC85 Fleet StreetLondon EC4P 4AJ

23 March 2004

**Consent of Independent Accountants**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 33-16927, No. 33-90398, No. 333-5998 and No. 333-57266) of Reuters Group PLC of our report dated 3 March 2004 relating to the financial statements of Reuters Group PLC, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors

London, England

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England with registered number OC303525.  The registered office of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is        1 Embankment Place, London WC2N 6RH.  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for designated investment business. 

----
May 24, 1944

No. 49446.

Suit 4448.

#### Eurasia *Import Co., Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 750 reversed. C. A. D. 273.
EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Foreign Subsidiaries:

SonoSite, Ltd., a United Kingdom
subsidiary        SonoSite France SARL, a
French subsidiary        SonoSite GmbH, a
German subsidiary        SonoSite
Iberica, S.L., a Spanish
subsidiary        SonoSite (Asia)
Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary       
SonoSite Japan KK, a Japanese subsidiarySonoSite Australasia Pty
Limited, an Australian subsidiary       
SonoSite Canada, Inc., a Canadian
subsidiary        SonoSite China Medical
Ltd., a Hong Kong subsidiary       
SonoSite Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary

73

---
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1541 

AN ACT 

To revise the Federal charter for the Blue Star Mothers 

of America, Inc. to reflect a change in eligibility requirements for membership. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1541 ES

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF MEMBERSHIP TERMS. 

2 Section 30504 of title 36, United States Code, is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

5 (A) by striking the text preceding subpara6 graph (A) and inserting ‘‘she is a mother 

7 (meaning a woman who filled the role of 

8 birthmother, adoptive mother, step-mother, fos9 ter-mother, grandmother, or legal guardian) of 

10 a person who—’’; and 

11 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘in 

12 World War II or the Korean hostilities’’; and 

13 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or is a cit14 izen of the United States living outside the United 

15 States’’ before the period at the end. 

Passed the Senate November 18, 2011. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1541 

AN ACT 

To revise the Federal charter for the Blue Star 

eligibility requirements for membership. Mothers of America, Inc. to reflect a change in
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 24, 2014

p0917

Order 

Clerk

September 24, 2014

148678

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148678

COA: 316576

Genesee CC: 99-004796-FC

NATHAN GENE REID,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. In the Court of Appeals, the defendant 

sought leave to appeal two orders of the Genesee Circuit Court, both dated December 21, 

2012. The Court of Appeals docketed the defendant’s delayed application for leave to 

appeal as an appeal only from the December 21, 2012 order denying the defendant’s 

motion for the production of documents, and then denied leave to appeal for lack of merit 

in the grounds presented. With regard to this ruling, leave to appeal is DENIED, because 

we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. It 

does not appear that the Court of Appeals reviewed the defendant’s challenge to the other 

circuit court order. Accordingly, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave 

to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of that part of 

the defendant’s delayed application for leave to appeal that sought leave to appeal the 

December 21, 2012 order of the Genesee Circuit Court denying, under MCR 6.502(G), 

the defendant’s motion to rescind or revoke or vacate his plea. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [T-1-2007]

On March 12, 2007, an application was filed by the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board submitted by the South Carolina State Ports Authority, grantee of FTZ 38, requesting temporary/interim manufacturing (T/IM) authority on behalf of Kittel Supplier USA, Inc., to assemble automotive door trim components under FTZ procedures within FTZ 38-Site 3, Duncan, South Carolina.

                    The application has been processed in accordance with T/IM procedures, as authorized by FTZ Board Orders 1347 (69 FR 52857, 8-30-2004) and 1480 (71 FR 55422, 9-22-2006), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (72 FR 13081, 3-20-2007). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval under T/IM procedures. The foreign-origin components approved for this activity are: window frames (HTSUS 8708.29); B, C and D-pillar trim (8708.29); division bars (8708.29); metal clips (8302.30); and, rubber seals (4016.93). Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary in the above-referenced Board Orders, the application is approved, effective this date, until May 4, 2009, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                

Dated: May 4, 2007.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-9326 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
(Reap. Dec. 9028)

Entry No. 11093, etc.

#### John A. Steer Co. *v.*United States

(Decided December 11, 1957)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made part of the decision herein, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain bicycles.

By stipulation of the parties, it has been agreed that said articles were appraised on the basis of statutory cost of production. It was further stipulated and agreed that the cost of materials and fabrication, manipulation, or other process employed in manufacturing or producing such or similar merchandise, at a time preceding the date of exportation of the involved merchandise which would ordinarily permit the manufacture or production thereof in the usual course of business, plus the usual general expenses (not less than 10 per centum of such cost) in the case of such or similar merchandise, plus the cost of all containers and coverings, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, and plus an addition for profit (not less than 8 per centum of the costs of materials and fabrication or manipulation and general expenses), equal to the profit which ordinarily is added to the cost of merchandise of the same general character by manufacturers or producers in the country of manufacture who are engaged in the manufacture of merchandise of the same class or kind equals—

> $18.29 plus packing

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis of value for the bicycles in issue and that said value is as follows:

> $18.29 plus packing

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF 10-K REPORT

OF

NAVIGANT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2003



1. The
undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Navigant International, Inc. (the Company). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification
accompanies the 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 28, 2003.



2. We certify that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This Certification is executed as of March 12, 2004.



By:

/s/ Edward S. AdamsEdward S. Adams Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/ Robert C. GriffithRobert C. Griffith Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Navigant International, Inc. and will be retained by Navigant International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 65770.

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 61/2019 and 61/2042 (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 56702.

protest 179608-K (New York).

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David M. Barnes, CFO and Financial and Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                  By: /s/ David M. Barnes
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      David M. Barnes
                                      Chief Financial Officer,
                                      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

                                      June 22, 2006