26184 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 88 / Tuesday, May 8, 2007 / Notices 

NRC Section Chief: Thomas H. Boyce. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day 

of May 2007. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Harold K. Chernoff, 

Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. E7–8679 Filed 5–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY 

CORPORATION 

Proposed Submission of Information 

Collection for OMB Review; Comment 

Request; Reconsideration of Initial 

Determinations 

AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation. 

ACTION: Notice of intention to request 

OMB approval. 

SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation (PBGC) intends to request 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) approve, under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act, a collection 

of information under its regulation on 

Rules for Administrative Review of 

Agency Decisions. This notice informs 

the public of PBGC’s intent and solicits 

public comment on the collection of 

information. 

DATES: Comments should be submitted 

by July 9, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web 

site instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: 

paperwork.comments@pbgc.gov. 

• Fax: 202–326–4224. 

• Mail or Hand Delivery: Legislative 

and Regulatory Department, Pension 

Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K 

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005–

4026. Comments received will be posted 

to http:www.pbgc.gov. 

Copies of the collection of information 

may also be obtained without charge by 

writing to the Disclosure Division of the 

Office of the General Counsel of PBGC 

at the above address or by visiting the 

Disclosure Division or calling 202–326–

4040 during normal business hours. 

(TTY and TDD users may call the 

Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800–

877–8339 and ask to be connected to 

202–326–4040.) PBGC’s regulation on 

Administrative Appeals may be 

accessed on PBGC’s Web site at http:// 

www.pbgc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Donald McCabe, Attorney, or Catherine 

B. Klion, Manager, Regulatory and 

Policy Division, Legislative and 

Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit 

Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20005–4026, 202–

326–4024. (For TTY and TDD, call 800–

877–8339 and request connection to 

202–326–4024). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PBGC’s 

regulation on Rules for Administrative 

Review of Agency Decisions (29 CFR 

part 4003) prescribes rules governing 

the issuance of initial determinations by 

the PBGC and the procedures for 

requesting and obtaining review of 

initial determinations through 

reconsideration or appeal. Subpart A of 

the regulation specifies which initial 

determinations are subject to 

reconsideration. Subpart C prescribes 

rules on who may request 

reconsideration, when to make such a 

request, where to submit it, form and 

content of reconsideration requests, and 

other matters relating to 

reconsiderations. 

Any person aggrieved by an initial 

determination of PBGC under 

§ 4003.1(b)(1) (determinations that a 

plan is covered by section 4021 of 

ERISA), § 4003.1(b)(2) (determinations 

concerning premiums, interest, and late 

payment penalties under section 4007 of 

ERISA), § 4003.1(b)(3) (determinations 

concerning voluntary terminations), or 

§ 4003.1(b)(4) (determinations 

concerning allocation of assets under 

section 4044 of ERISA) may request 

reconsideration of the initial 

determination. Requests for 

reconsideration must be in writing, be 

clearly designated as requests for 

reconsideration, contain a statement of 

the grounds for reconsideration and the 

relief sought, and contain or reference 

all pertinent information. 

PBGC intends to request that OMB 

approve this collection of information 

for three years. An agency may not 

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 

required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

PBGC estimates that an average of 940 

appellants per year will respond to this 

collection of information. PBGC further 

estimates that the average annual 

burden of this collection of information 

is 0.35 hours and $545 per person, with 

an average total annual burden of 329 

hours and $512,219. 

PBGC is soliciting public comments 

to—

• Evaluate whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or 

• Other technological collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology, e.g., permitting electronic 

submission of responses. 

Issued in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of 

May 2007. 

John H. Hanley, 

Director, Legislative and Regulatory 

Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. E7–8708 Filed 5–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7709–01–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request for Review of a Revised 

Information Collection: SF 2823 

AGENCY: Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 

L. 104–13, May 22, 1995), this notice 

announces that the Office of Personnel 

Management (OPM) will submit to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) a request for review of a revised 

information collection. SF 2823, 

Designation of Beneficiary: Federal 

Employees’ Group Life Insurance, is 

used by any Federal employee or retiree 

covered by the Federal Employees’

Group Life Insurance Program to 

instruct the Office of Federal 

Employees’ Group Life Insurance how 

to distribute the proceeds of his or her 

life insurance when the statutory order 

of precedence does not meet his or her 

needs. 

Comments are particularly invited on: 

Whether this collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of functions of the Office of Personnel 

Management, and whether it will have 

practical utility; whether our estimate of 

the public burden of this collection of 

information is accurate, and based on 

valid assumptions and methodology; 

and ways in which we can minimize the 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES