alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATE      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.      1350)**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
| /s/  Enrique                de Vilmorin                                                     |   |   |   |
| Enrique                de VilmorinChief                Executive OfficerApril                17, 2007 |   |   |   |
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20858 Conference Calendar

__________________ DAVID OGIEMWANYE, Petitioner-Appellant, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-1649 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David Ogiemwanye appeals from the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment in favor of respondent because he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the appellant's brief, the record, and the magistrate judge's opinion and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. The motion for a writ of certiorari is DENIED. AFFIRMED.
No. 54340.

#### United Fruit Company *v.*United States,

protest 152165-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the papers failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William C. Robinson, CEO, Chairman and Principal Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                           CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                        By: /s/ William C. Robinson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            William C. Robinson
                                            CEO, President, Chairman and
                                            Principal Executive Officer

                                            February 7, 2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1187

NATALYA TAMARA HAMPEL; JOSEPH HAMPEL, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-124-JFM) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 6, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Natalya Tamara Hampel, Joseph Hampel, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Natalya Tamara Hampel and Joseph Hampel appeal the district court’s order summarily dismissing their complaint alleging that defendants acted under color of federal law to deprive the Hampels of their constitutional rights. We have reviewed the record andthe district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hampel v. United States , No. CA-01-124-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Partners in Protection, Insight into security and emergency services: Guy Simmons

By Army Sgt. Saul RosaDLA Aviation public affairs

                Richmond, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Aviationpartners in protectionProcess ExcellenceWarfighter Firstphysical securityDefense Supply Center RichmondPeople and Culture
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Little Genesis, Inc.
1-800-PRO-TEAM, LLC
Athletic Supply of Dallas, LLC
First Step Designs, LLC
The Voyager's Collection, LLC
Competitive Edge Golf, LLC
Childswork/Childsplay, LLC
Ninos, LLC
Hot Off The Ice, LLC
Gifts for Grandkids, LLC
Beyond The Horizon, LLC
The Training Camp, LLC
Affinity College and University Catalogs, LLC
Genesis Direct Operations L.L.C.
Genesis Direct Secaucus Operations, LLC
Genesis Direct Memphis Operations, LLC
Genesis Direct Memphis Services, LLC
Global Friends, LLC
Command Performance, LLC
Merchandise Manufacturing, LLC
The Music Stand, LLC
Nothin' But Hoops, LLC
Soccer Madness, LLC
ExL Catalogs, LLC
Genesis Direct Citybooks, LLC
Sport Kids, LLC
Manny's Baseball Land, LLC
Genesis Direct Europe, LLC
Biobottoms, LLC
Pro Sports Liquidators, LLC
Genesis Direct Thirty-Seven, LLC
The Edge Company Catalog, LLC
CW Gifts, LLC
Retail Operations, LLC

_______________________
Subsidiaries not included on this list, considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of March 27, 1999.
No. 55502.

#### Abraham Aronin *v.*United States,

protest 140809-K (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
# C_2013063EN.01000701.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 14 November 2012 — Zentralbetriebsrat der gemeinnützigen Salzburger Landeskliniken Betriebs GmbH v Province of Salzburg

(Case C-514/12)

2013/C 63/11

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesgericht Salzburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Zentralbetriebsrat der gemeinnützigen Salzburger Landeskliniken Betriebs GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Province of Salzburg

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation No 492/2011 (1) preclude national legislation (here, Paragraphs 53 and 54 of the Salzburger Landesvertragsbedienstetengesetz) under which, for the purposes of determining the effective date for advancement, a public employer takes into account all uninterrupted periods of service which its employees have completed with it, but takes into account, on an all-inclusive basis from a certain age, only a proportion of the periods of service which its employees have completed with other public or private employers whether within Austria or in other EU or EEA States?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1).

1

---
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1412 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2011 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 462 Washington Street, Woburn, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Officer John Maguire Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1412 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. OFFICER JOHN MAGUIRE POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 462 Washington Street, Woburn, 

4 Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Of5 ficer John Maguire Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Officer John Maguire 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate October 20, 2011. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, I, Kevin M. Goodwin, Chief Executive Officer of SonoSite, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of SonoSite, Inc.



/s/    KEVIN M. GOODWINKevin M. Goodwin President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


March 14, 2008
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NHY/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA ISABEL SANJUR; MARIA

ISABEL SANJUR, Jr.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71133

Agency Nos. A029-494-298

 A029-494-301

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: PREGERSON, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Maria Isabel Sanjur and her daughter, Maria Isabel Sanjur, natives and

citizens of Panama, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8

FILED

MAR 31 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
NHY/Research 2 07-71133

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen

and review de novo due process claims due to ineffective assistance of counsel.

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the

petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to

reopen where Petitioners lacked “plausible grounds for relief.” See Rojas-Garcia

v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Petitioners’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 91 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26852-26853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9181]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week 
of May 14, 2007:

Closed Meetings will be held on Tuesday, May 15, 2007 at 2 p.m. and 
Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 9:45 a.m.


[[Page 26853]]


    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meetings. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meetings.
    Commissioner Atkins, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 
15, 2007 will be:

Formal orders of investigations;
Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
An adjudicatory matter; and
Other matters related to enforcement proceedings.

    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
May 17, 2007 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    May 8, 2007.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-9181 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
#### Peggy Nell GRIGGS v. RIVERLAND MEDICAL CENTER, et al.

No. 99-C-0385.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 28, 1999.

IN RE: Louisiana Patients’ Comp. Fund.; - Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CA98-0256; Parish of Concordia 7th Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 32,556.

Denied.

MARCUS, J. not on panel.

LEMMON, J. concurs and assigns reasons.

11 LEMMON, J.,

Concurring in the Denial of the Application.

The present status of the claim of the tort victim’s children of a previous marriage is unclear. The trial court granted the motion to sever these claims from the trial of the claims of the tort victim’s surviving spouse, and the court of appeal denied supervisory writs because denial of the severance would have upset an approaching trial date. *Griggs v. Riverland Medical Ctr.,*97-1101 (La.App. 3d Cir.8/22/97).

On appeal following trial on the merits, the court of appeal noted that the trial court granted the severance at a time when the surviving spouse had not yet asserted any claim in this litigation following the favorable decision of the medical review panel. *Griggs v. Riverland Medical Ctr.*98-256 p. 11 (La.App. 3d Cir.10/14/98), 722 So.2d 15, 21. According to the court of appeal, the children of the previous marriage intervened in the present proceeding after the severance was granted. The court of appeal accordingly ruled that the earlier order of severance did not prejudice the Patients Compensation Fund (PCF). *Id.*
      *1*

fyWhen separate claims have been filed in the same proceeding and payment of the claims, if successful, ultimately will be made from the limited fund for compensation of a medical malpractice victim’s statutory survivors, the PCF generally is entitled to have all claims against the limited amount of its liability tried at the same time. There appears to be no obstacle at the present time to joint trial of all survivors’ claims in this proceeding. However, the Fund may seek relief in the district court and by supervisory writs prior to trial if all claims are not scheduled for trial in the same proceeding.

. I specifically question two aspects of the decision of the court of appeal. First, the doctrine of law of the case clearly is inapplicable to a prior ruling on supervisory writs. Second, although La.Code Civ.Proc. art. 967 requires an affidavit based on personal knowledge for use in motions for summary judgment, that rule is clearly limited to a lay witness who must have personal knowledge about the facts to which the witness would testify at trial. However, an expert is always allowed to testify at trial, irrespective of personal knowledge, by means of a hypothetical question. The same rule should apply to the affidavit of an expert used in a motion for summary judgment, and the expert should be allowed to express an opinion based on material facts as to which there is no genuine dispute.
Exhibit 21



List of Subsidiaries



The Company has ten wholly-owned subsidiaries located throughout the world. The wholly-owned subsidiaries are as follows:



| | 1. | Mannatech Australia Pty Limited
| | -- | -------------------------------

| | 2. | Mannatech Japan, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------

| | 3. | Mannatech Korea, Ltd.
| | -- | ---------------------

| | 4. | Mannatech Limited New Zealand
| | -- | -----------------------------

| | 5. | Mannatech Limited, UK
| | -- | ---------------------

| | 6. | Mannatech Taiwan Corporation
| | -- | ----------------------------

| | 7. | Mannatech Taiwan Corporation Taiwan Branch
| | -- | ------------------------------------------

| | 8. | Mannatech Foreign Sales Corporation
| | -- | -----------------------------------

| | 9. | Mannatech Payment Services Incorporated
| | -- | ---------------------------------------

| | 10. | Mannatech Products Company, Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------------
---



| | Peter A. Ronning, P. Eng.
| | -------------------------
| |                          
| | 22 July, 2008            

Pacific Rim Mining Corp.#410  625 Howe
StreetVancouver, BCV7L 1J1

Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

Re: Pacific Rim Mining Corporation

Consent

The undersigned hereby consents
  to being named in the Annual Information Form dated July 18, 2008 (AIF),
  Management Discussion and Analysis dated July 18, 2008 (the MD&A),
  and the Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008 (the Form 40-F)
  and to the inclusion of references to and extracts from the report entitled
  Technical Report Update on the El Dorado Project Gold and Silver Resources
  dated March 3, 2008 (the Report) in the AIF, the MD& A and the
  Form 40-F:

I confirm that I have read the
  AIF, the MD&A and the Form 40-F and have no reason to believe that there
  are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that is derived
  from the Report or that the written disclosure contains any misrepresentation
  of the information contained in the Report, confirm that the information contained
  therein that is derived from the Report fairly and accurately represents the
  information in the Report that supports the written disclosure and confirm that
  such matters are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by
  me in connection with the Report.

| | Yours sincerely         
| | ------------------------
| |                         
| | Peter A. Ronning, P.Eng.

---