alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
34215.

#### GUESS v. GUESS.

Marshall, Justice.

This is an appeal by a former wife from an order of the trial court sustaining her former husband’s motion to dismiss her action against him to remove a cloud to her title to the family homeplace. She claims that a provision of the divorce decree awarding the husband a one-half interest in the homeplace, title to which he had conveyed to her prior to the divorce, in effect unlawfully awarded him alimony out of her separate estate.

The record shows, however, that the husband’s counterclaim in the divorce action raised the issue that the parties’ intent was that the conveyance should be in trust for tax purposes, and not a gift. See *Talmadge v. Talmadge,*241 Ga. 609 (2) (247 SE2d 61) (1978). Accordingly, that issue having been involved in the prior action, the final divorce decree is presumed to have adjudicated the issue of title, and that judgment cannot be collaterally attacked in this quia timet action. Code § 110-501; *Chilivis v. Dasher,*236 Ga. 669, 670 (225 SE2d 32) (1976).

Moreover, the record shows that the appellant was awarded by the divorce decree, one half of the proceeds of the future sale of the homeplace, the use of the homeplace until the youngest child reached 18 years of age, and the benefit of living there free as a result of the further provision that the appellee make payments on the mortgage debt. "It is generally recognized that a party litigant who accepts benefits under a divorce decree is estopped to set it aside.” *Vickery v. Vickery,*237 Ga. 702 (229 SE2d 453) (1976) and cits.; *Wilkinson v. Wilkinson,*241 Ga. 303, 304 (245 SE2d 278) (1978) and cits.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hill and Bowles, JJ., who concur in the judgment only.*

*787Argued November 14, 1978

Decided January 4, 1979.

*Clifford H. Hardwick,*for appellant.

*Jack P. Turner, Robert G. Wellon,*for appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
SonomaWest Holdings,  Inc. condensed financial statements for the interim period
ended  December 31, 2000  included in Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0000102588
<NAME>                        SonomaWest Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Jun-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  Jul-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                7,603
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                           110
<ALLOWANCES>                             10
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      8,733
<PP&E>                                2,624
<DEPRECIATION>                          242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       11,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   616
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              3,254
<OTHER-SE>                            5,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          9,098
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        554
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,030
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       83
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (297)
<INCOME-TAX>                          (120)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (177)
<DISCONTINUED>                          147
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           (30)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.12)



</TABLE>
# C_2017078EN.01002201.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2017 — International Management Group v Commission

(Case T-29/15) (1)

1

((Development cooperation - Annual Action Programme in favour of Myanmar/Burma to be financed from the general budget of the European Union - Budget implementing decision - Modification - Action for annulment - Challengeable act - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of sound financial management - Principle of good administration - Transparency - Remedy - Legitimate expectations))

(2017/C 078/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: International Management Group (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Burgstaller, C. Farrell, Solicitors, and E. Wright, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and S. Bartelt, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 9787 final of 16 December 2014, amending Implementing Decision C(2013) 7682 final on the Annual Action Programme 2013 in favour of Myanmar/Burma to be financed from the general budget of the European Union.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders International Management Group to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders International Management Group to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 81, 9.3.2015.

1

---
No. 6364.

#### PETER B. CULLOM vs. CHARLES F. EPSTEIN.

Syllabus.

Where the lower Court dismissed an appeal for insufficiency of the surety, a motion in this Court to dismiss the appeal, accompanied by the judgment of the lower Court to that effect, will prevail in the absence of any indication that the ruling of the lower Court has, in a manner provided by law, been brought up for review.

Appeal from the Civil District Court, for the Parish of Orleans, Division “C,” No. 101,004. Honorable E. K. Skinner, Judge.

Robert O’Connor, for plaintiff and appellee.

*292Opinion and decree, April 19th, 1915.

Nix & Parkerson, for defendant and .appellant.

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

A motion has been made in this Court to dismiss the appeal taken by Charles Epstein, defendant, and there accompanies said motion the certified proceedings and a judgment of the trial Court, rendered since the filing of the transcript in this Court, dismissing said appeal on the ground that the surety on the ¡appeal bond was not solvent or sufficient.

As it does not appear that the appellant has in any manner provided by law sought to reverse or review the judgment of the trial Court dismissing his appeal, the motion in this Court to dismiss the appeal must prevail.

Forman vs. Fayard, 7 Ct. of Appeal, 490.

It is accordingly ordered that the .appeal of Charles Epstein, defendant, be dismissed at his costs.

Appeal dismissed.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. §1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Pacific Rim Mining Corp.
  (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended April 30, 2008 as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
  I, Thomas C. Shrake, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|July 18, 2008 | Thomas C. Shrake     
|------------- | -----------------------
|              |                        
|              | Thomas C. Shrake       
|              | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Pacific Rim Mining Corp. and will be retained by
Pacific Rim Mining Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PRIMESTAR,
INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  147,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,442
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,562,458
<DEPRECIATION>                                 413,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,112,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,833,195
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,009
<OTHER-SE>                                   (286,783)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,112,087
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,289,666
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  647,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               543,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,939
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,491,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (147,528)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,343,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,343,704)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.02)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012287EN.01002702.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/27

---

Appeal brought on 16 July 2012 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 25 April 2012 in Case T-509/10 Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft v Council

Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft v Council

(Case C-348/12 P)

2012/C 287/53

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran; European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the judgment delivered on 25 April 2012 by the General Court (Fourth Chamber) in Case T-509/10; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment delivered on 25 April 2012 by the General Court (Fourth Chamber) in Case T-509/10;

| — | Give a final ruling in the dispute and dismiss as inadmissible the action brought by Kala Naft against the acts of the Council at issue or, in the alternative, dismiss the action as unfounded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Give a final ruling in the dispute and dismiss as inadmissible the action brought by Kala Naft against the acts of the Council at issue or, in the alternative, dismiss the action as unfounded;

| — | Order Kala Naft to pay the costs incurred by the Court at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Kala Naft to pay the costs incurred by the Court at first instance and on appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Council submits that the judgment of the General Court in the abovementioned case is vitiated by two errors and that, in consequence, the judgment should be set aside.

Firstly, the Council is of the opinion that the General Court erred in law by failing to dismiss the action brought by Kala Naft as inadmissible, given that, in the Council’s submission, that undertaking is an entity of the Iranian Government.

Secondly, the Council argues that the General Court erred in law in holding that one of the grounds justifying the imposition of restrictive measures against Kala Naft was not sufficient to satisfy the duty to state reasons and that the Council was required to adduce evidence to support another of those grounds. The Council also submits that the General Court erred in law by holding that the fact that Kala Naft markets equipment for the oil and gas sectors which is liable to be used in the Iranian nuclear programme cannot be regarded as ‘supporting’ nuclear proliferation, without placing that fact in context with the other justifying grounds.

---
\0 ,

s

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

7o REGION I 0

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

.`\ ►'/. =o Seattle, WA 98101-3140

PRO1EG OFFICE or

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

January 22, 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Clarification of Tacoma-Pierce County PM2,5 Nonattainment Area Emission

Inventory Scope and Boundary

FROM: Jeff Hunt, Tacoma-Pierce County Nonattainment Area PM 2.5 LeaTO: Debra Suzuki, Air Planning Unit Manager

I reviewed the emissions inventory submitted as part of the November 28, 2012 State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to address the Tacoma-Pierce County fine particulate

nonattainment area. This emissions inventory was submitted to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA)

section 172(c)(3) statutory requirements to "include a comprehensive, accurate, current inventory

of actual emissions from all sources of the relevant pollutant or pollutants in such area, including

such periodic revisions as the Administrator may determine necessary to assure that the

requirements of this part'are met." As part of the ongoing technical cooperation between the

Puyallup Tribe, Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Washington Department of Ecology, and EPA

Region 10, I have confirmed that the inventory reflects emission sources throughout the entire

nonattairunent area, including Tribal land, Upon EPA's final approval of the November 28,

2012 SIP revision, the CAA 172(c)(3) requirements will be fully satisfied for the entire

nonattainment area, including the Tribal trust land.
,-...., 

Response to 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Volume 1 of2 

r · Request for Information 

received June 10, 2010 

Grainger Generating Station 

~antee cooper 
August 6, 201 0 

Ms. Eleanor Ku Codding, P.E. 

Eastern Research Group, Inc. 

14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 

Chantilly, VA 20151-11 02 

~antee cooper' 

R. M. Singletary, Ill 

Execulive Vice Presidenl of 

Corporale Services 

1643) 761·4129 

fax: (843) 761·7037 

rmsingle@sanleecooper.com 

RE: South Carolina Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper) Response to EPA's 

Request for Information Under Section 308 of the Clean Water Act and Section 3007 

of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act for Grainger Generating Station -

Request received June 10, 2010 

Dear Ms. Codding: 

r , Enclosed is the South Carolina Public Service Authority's ("Santee Cooper") response to the 

United States Environmental Protection Agency's ("EPA") Request for lnfonnation ("Request") 

under Section 308 of the Clean Water Act and Section 3007 of the Resource Conservation and 

Recovery Act. The Response and Certification is identified as Exhibit A, and a copy of the 

Request received on June 10, 2010, is identified as Exhibit B. 

In preparing the Response, Santee Cooper conducted a good faith review of its records and 

interviewed knowledgeable personnel, but reserves the right to supplement or correct the 

Response if new or additional responsive information comes to its attention. 

Sincerely, 

RMS:JH:SWJ 

Enclosures 

cc: w/o enclosures 

Stacey Adams 

SCDHEC 

2600 Bull Street 

Columbia, SC 29201 

OneRiverwoodOrive: MoncksCorner.SC29461·2901 (643)761 ·8000 I P.O. Box2946101 ; MoncksComer, SC29461·610 1
#### Tyran PAUL v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Dayna Talley.

No. 98-C-2921.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re "Paul, Tyran; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District-Court, Div. “E”, No. 489-307; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 98-CA-0499.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Kenneth HahnKenneth HahnChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: May 6, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2003


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, each of the undersigned officers of Iroquois Gas
Transmission System, L.P., a limited partnership organized under the laws of
the State of Delaware (the "Partnership"), does hereby certify that, to the
best of such officer's knowledge:


     1.   The accompanying Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form
          10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report")
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Partnership.



                                          /s/ E.J. Holm
                                          ---------------------------
                                          E. J. Holm
                                          President
                                          November 14, 2005



                                          /s/ Paul Bailey
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Paul Bailey
                                          Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
                                          November 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, I, Michael J. Schuh, Chief Financial Officer of SonoSite, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of SonoSite, Inc.



/s/    MICHAEL J. SCHUHMichael J. Schuh Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


March 10, 2009
No. 49470.

#### Protest 13444-K of American Import Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial the witness for plaintiff produced a sample of merchandise which was received in evidence and which appears to be made of yellow rubber, somewhat spherical in shape, about 2 inches in diameter, and formed to imitate the head of a dog A small metal whistle is imbedded in the head. He testified that he had never seen the merchandise in actual use and that his knowledge in relation to its use was limited to the nature of the business engaged in by the customers of his employer. From an examination of the entire record the court found that the plaintiff had failed to establish a *•prima facie*case. The protest was therefore overruled.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# LDC SPEAKER EVENT:  Colonel (Retired) Christopher L. Warner

By Julie ReitanDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The presenter for the Leadership Development Council speaker event for Sept. is retired Col. Christopher Warner. 

Mr. Warner is a department manager for Nuclear Safety, Federal Solutions, West Atkins Nuclear Solutions, Dublin, Ohio. 

The topic of discussion will be “Situational Leadership.”This event is open to all DSCC associates. 

If you have any questions, please contact the LDC Communications Chair or call 614-692-3481.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Leadership Development Association L&MDLA L&M
No. 55555.

#### Becker Mayer Seed Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 156538-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in.Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.