alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Liberty Group Publishing,
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i)      the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
     the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

         Dated: March 30, 2004                /s/ KENNETH L. SEROTA
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Kenneth L. Serota
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Chairman of the Board of
                                              Directors

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Liberty Group Publishing,
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i)      the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
     the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

         Dated: March 30, 2004                /s/ DANIEL D. LEWIS
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Daniel D. Lewis
                                              Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE JAIME LUEVANO, 

RELATOR.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00145-CR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Sam Medrano, Judge of the 409th District Court of El Paso County, 

Texas, and concludes Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore 

deny the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J. (Not Participating)
33581.

#### ANNANDALE AT SUWANEE, INC. v. GWINNETT COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS.

Hall, Justice.

"Institutions of purely public charity” are exempt from taxation. Code Ann. § 92-201. Appellant Annandale at Suwanee is a nonprofit corporation which has established a home for mentally handicapped persons on approximately 100 acres in Gwinnett County. The trial court, on an appeal from the Board of Equalization, held that appellant was not a "purely public charity” and was not, therefore, entitled to property tax exemption. We affirm. '

Claims for tax exemption are construed in favor of the state and against the taxpayer. *Johnson v. Wormsloe Foundation,*228 Ga. 722 (187 SE2d 682) (1972). Although Annandale at Suwanee clearly has a benevolent purpose, it falls short of being an institution of purely public charity.

First, Annandale at Suwanee has 29 residents. The monthly fee of $625 per resident is met in the majority of cases by payments from various government agencies and the families of the residents. Thus, over seventy percent of the operating costs of Annandale at Suwanee come from the government or client fees. Private donations account *242for only fifteen percent of the expenditures of the home. Although testimony indicated that no one for financial reasons had been turned away from Annandale at Suwanee, the director also admitted that many families were probably discouraged by the $625 per month charge. Since the families of residents or government agencies on their behalf pay monthly for each resident, Annandale at Suwanee is not sufficiently "public” in nature. *St. Joseph Hospital of Augusta v. Bohler,*229 Ga. 577 (193 SE2d 603) (1972).

Submitted June 30, 1978

Decided September 27, 1978.

*Hatcher, Meyerson & Irvin, Stanley P. Meyerson,*for appellant.

*James A. Henderson,*for appellee.

Appellant has relied heavily upon the Court of Appeals decisions in *Central Bd. on Care of Jewish Aged v. Henson,*120 Ga. App. 627 (171 SE2d 747) (1969) and *Peachtree on Peachtree Inn v. Camp,*120 Ga. App. 403 (170 SE2d 709) (1969). We note that both these facilities were for care of the elderly and are now subject to a specific statutory. exemption. Code Ann. § 92-201.8. Further, 85 percent of the residents of Peachtree Inn had incomes below the poverty line for persons of their age. Similarly, in the home provided by the Board for Care of the Jewish Aged, eleven of the 61 residents paid no part of the $450 per month charge, and about fifty percent of the residents paid less than $100 per month. These cases are thus distinguishable from that of Annandale at Suwanee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, H. Douglas Chaffin, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ H. Douglas ChaffinH.
      Douglas ChaffinChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      9, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MBT Financial Corp. and will be retained by MBT Financial Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 96-1139.

#### Morrow *v.*Winslow, Judge, District Court of Tulsa County, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9337]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service (MMS)


Notice of Availability (NOA) of Final Programmatic Environmental 
Assessment (EA) for the Coastal Impact Assistance Program (CIAP)

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: NOA of Programmatic Environmental Assessment and Finding of No 
Significant Impact (FONSI).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) has prepared a 
programmatic EA and a FONSI for the implementation of the CIAP. This EA 
was prepared to assist agency planning and decisionmaking in future 
assessment of individual projects (40 CFR 1501.3(b)). The programmatic 
EA is available on the MMS Web site at: http://www.mms.gov/offshore/CIAPmain.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James F. Bennett, Chief, Branch of 
Environmental Assessment, Minerals Management Service, 381 Elden 
Street, Mail Stop 4042, Herndon, Virginia, 20170. Telephone: (703) 787-
1660, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#701a165e12151e1e150404301d1d035e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fe5e9a1edeae1e1eafbfbcfe2e2fca1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 13, 2007.
Chris C. Oynes,
Associate Director for Offshore Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. E7-9337 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 4.35

Date: October 18, 2007

The undersigned, each of which is a party to that certain Asset Purchase
Agreement (the "AGREEMENT"), dated January 16, 2007, by and among Healthcare
Technologies Ltd., an Israeli company, Nexgen Biofuels, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, MAC Bioventures, Inc., a Belize corporation and Gamida For Life,
B.V., a Netherlands corporation, as amended, hereby agree that the date "October
31, 2007" which appears in Sections 1.65 and 12.1.2 of the Agreement shall be
deemed to read "December 31, 2007".

In all other respects, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in
full force and effect.

We hereby agree to the above:

                                                   HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
                                                   an Israeli company

                                                   By:    ______________________
                                                   Name:  ______________________
                                                   Title: ______________________


                                                   NEXGEN BIOFUELS, INC.,
                                                   a Delaware corporation

                                                   By:    ______________________
                                                   Name:  ______________________
                                                   Title: ______________________


                                                   MAC BIOVENTURES, INC.
                                                   a Belize corporation

                                                   By:    ______________________
                                                   Name:  ______________________
                                                   Title: ______________________


                                                   GAMIDA FOR LIFE, B.V.,
                                                   a Netherlands corporation

                                                   By:    ______________________
                                                   Name:  ______________________
                                                   Title: ______________________
No. 54346.

#### W. R. Zanes & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 121987-K (Galveston).

Ekwall, Judge:

It is claimed in this case that the entries involved were made under duress; that no notice of appraisement was issued and that, therefore, the liquidation is invalid. In an amendment to the protest it is further claimed that the matter should be remanded to a single judge for determination of dutiable value as provided in section 501, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 16 (c) of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938.

The case has been submitted upon the following stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the entries covered by the above protest were entered under duress certificate in accordance with Section 503 (b) Tariff Act of 1930 and Section 8.17 Customs Regulations of 1943 and notice of appraisement was not issued in accordance with Section 17.6 (b) of Customs Regulations 1943 and the entries were liquidated at the appraised value which included the amount of the British Purchase Tax which was entered under duress certificate.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the Report of Collector on Protest dated December 3, 1945 and the copy of the letter of the Acting Commissioner of Customs dated September 13, 1945 forwarded by the Collector with the above protest may be incorporated in the record herein.

It is further stipulated and agreed that the issue is the same in all material respects as the issue in *W. X. Huber Co.*v. *United States,*C. D. 1093 and the record in said C. D. 1093 be incorporated herein and the protest submitted upon such record and this stipulation, and the right to further amendment and first docket call is hereby waived. -

In the *Huber*case, cited in the stipulation, this court held that the failure of the collector of customs to send notice of appraisement under section 501, *swpra,*
      *469invalidated the appraisement and the liquidation based thereon. The court further held that in such a case remand to a single judge constituted the proper procedure.

In view of the stipulation above set forth and under authority of the decision therein cited we sustain plaintiff’s claims and hold the appraisement and liquidation based thereon illegal. We further hold that the matter should be and it is hereby remanded to a single judge who shall proceed to determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise according to law.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 45583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18469]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending July 19, 2014

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2014-0121.
    Date Filed: July 16, 2014.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: August 6, 2014.
    Description: Application of Frontier Airlines, Inc. (``Frontier'') 
requesting a certificate of public convenience and necessity 
authorizing it to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of 
persons, property and mail between (1) Washington, DC and Cancun, 
Mexico, (2) Washington, DC and Nassau, Bahamas, and (3) Trenton, New 
Jersey and Nassau, Bahamas. Frontier also requests a designation to 
operate in the Washington, DC-Cancun, Mexico market.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2014-18469 Filed 8-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
p. 1 

# JU tJ 4 201 3 P.O
. Bo x 331 , Millwood , V A 2264 6 (540 ) 837-160 2 

# Tas k Forc e Jul y 9 , 201 3 - % Q

B Y HAN D Documen t Contro l Offic e Offic e o f Pollutio n Preventio

n an d Toxic s Roo m6428 U.S . Environmenta

l Protection Agenc

y 120 0 PennsylvaniaAve. , N.W . Washington , D C 2046

0 

### I S C O o : % c n

# • •

c n T J O

CBI C Contro l Numbe r 

# 35507 2
Re : Testin

g Consen t Orde r fo r Ethylen e Dichloride ; Interi mRepor

t (Docke t No . OPPT-2003-0010'

) Dea r Sirs : Enclose d i n sextuplicat

e is th e six-mont

h interi mrepor

t require d unde r th e Enforceabl

e Consen t Agreemen

t fo r Ethylen e Dichloride , 68 Fed . Reg . 3312 5 (Jun e 3 , 2003 ) (th

e "EGA") , describin g th e status o f testin g conducte

d o r t o b e conducte

d unde r th e ECA . Pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contac t m e i f ther e i s an y questio n abou t thi s status report . Sincerely ,
Pete r E . Voytek/Ph.D . Manage r Enclosures cc : Joh

n E . Schaeffe

r W . Caffey Norman , Esq .

4812-453D-6641 .p . 2

I — 

### I a E o o o

C M C O c o u > c O

C O o e g a > c 3 " D I c o a . a ) C C

o " D U Q O c a j > .
. c 4- " LJ J i
_ O 0) 0 ) 

### 5 c
" D o a. 0 - " D C TO o > c

u o H c c o 0 5 L U Q

> - C C o o U J o

c c L U o o w c u Q H I 

## • s . E > •3 o as to V , 2 ! * $ O) . Q

. E v • a >

« . 2 v - 5 3 3 

### » 8

D )
" J 0 ) H <

Q . U J O +-> T 3 

### £ E n 3 ( 0
C TO Q . > 3 (/ ) o • D C V > . D ) « TO O • E x

. E 5 0) (j ) 

### I S 0) o § S

" O » - 3 £ 40 9 * r> ° O ) TO . £ > 2 £ TO C < . 2 

### S i 2 ? ! * r D > TO i , 

### I §
O ) c "5 5 l -

< N C

M C Mp . 3

2550 M Street , N

W Washington , D

C 20037-135 0 Documen t Contro l Offic e Offic e o f Pollutio n Preventio

n an dToxic s Roo m6428 U.S . Environmenta

l Protection Agenc

y 120 0 Pennsylvani

aAve. , N.W . Washington , DC 2046

0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 2, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1998
<CASH>                                          16,333
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,055
<INVENTORY>                                    183,763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               352,940
<PP&E>                                         877,130
<DEPRECIATION>                                 357,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 959,273
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          227,075
<BONDS>                                        571,408
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       137,473
<OTHER-SE>                                    (30,869)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   959,273
<SALES>                                      1,357,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,357,274
<CGS>                                          978,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,334,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,378
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,799)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (600)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,399)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
No. 42079.

#### Petition 5635-R of William J. Oberle, Inc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that an error was made by a clerk in preparing the entry. As there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts the court granted the petition.
No. 44318.

#### Protests 739436-G, etc., of Katz Berk Hat Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
April 2, 1943

No. 48168.

Suit 4406.

#### United *States*v. *Fallani*& *Cohn, Inc.*

reversed. C. A. D. 226.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 135 

To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and 

discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce permanent. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. ENSIGN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To make the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce 

permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Internet 

5 Tax Freedom Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMANENT MORATORIUM ON INTERNET ACCESS 

7 TAXES AND MULTIPLE AND DISCRIMINATORY 

8 TAXES ON ELECTRONIC COMMERCE. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a) of the Internet 

10 Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note) is amended by 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 135 IS

1 striking ‘‘taxes during the period beginning November 1, 

2 2003, and ending November 1, 2014:’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘taxes:’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxes imposed after the date 

6 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2012235EN.01000602.xml

| 4.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg lodged on 8 May 2012 — Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Fjola HLIDDAL

(Case C-216/12)

2012/C 235/10

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Caisse nationale des prestations familiales

Applicant:

Respondent: Fjola HLIDDAL

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Does a benefit such as the parental leave allowance provided for by Articles 306 to 308 of the [Luxembourg] Code de la Sécurité Sociale constitute a family benefit within the meaning of Article 1(u)(i) and Article 4(1)(h) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to the members of their families moving within the Community, (1) as amended and updated and applicable in accordance with Annex II, Section A, (1) of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons and the Final Act signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999? (2)

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1971, L 149, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ 2002, L 114, p. 6.

2

---