alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 9378)

#### Elliot Import Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. WH 48217-3.

(Decided April 7, 1959)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Goehr cm Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The above-entitled appeal for reappraisement, relating to leather gloves imported from Japan, has been submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the items marked and appraised as described on the attached schedule, and that such value, as to such items, is as shown on said schedule.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

*590Schedule

Entry No. WHB 48217 market value or

Reappraisement R58/18930-07069 price in TJ.S.

Item dollars per doz.

Items marked A and appraised at $9.00 per doz_$8. 00

Items marked B and appraised at $6.40 per doz_$5. 75

Items marked C and appraised at $5.50 per doz_$5.00
EX-10.1.4



 





Exhibit 10.1.4




WATER ACT 2003, SECTION 37(4) AND (5)




MODIFICATION OF CONDITION N OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPOINTMENT OF

EVERY WATER UNDERTAKER AND EVERY WATER AND SEWERAGE

UNDERTAKER IN ENGLAND AND WALES




Made on 20 September 2005

Coming into effect on 1 October 2005



The Director General of Water Services, in exercise of the power conferred upon him by Section 37
of the Water Act 2003, and after consulting each company holding an appointment under Chapter I of
Part II of the Water Industry Act 1991, hereby modifies Condition N in each of those appointments,
with effect on and from 1 October 2005, as follows:





	1.	 	In paragraph 2, by deleting “and” after the semicolon at the end of subparagraph (7);
	 
	2.	 	In paragraph 2, by deleting the full stop at the end of sub-paragraph (8) and substituting “;
and”;
	 
	3.	 	In paragraph 2, by adding the following sub-paragraph after sub-paragraph (8):
	 
	 	 	“(9) within 30 days of the date on which the Director notifies the Appointee of the amount
payable under this sub-paragraph, as derived from the following formula:
	 
	 	 	J=Gxt/T
	 
	 	 	Where
J is the amount payable under this sub-paragraph
G is:






	 	(a)	 	for that part of the current Charging Year commencing on 1 October 2005, the
sum of £2.9 million;
	 
	 	(b)	 	for the following Charging Year, an amount to be specified by the Secretary of
State for this purpose (the “Base Amount”); and
	 
	 	(c)	 	for each Charging Year following that one, the Base Amount, increased by the
percentage increase in the Retail Price Index between that published for November 2005
and that published for November in the Prior Year;






	 	 	t is equal to the turnover of the Appointed Business as shown in the accounting statements
prepared by the Appointee under paragraph 4 of Condition F for the financial year ending 12
months before the start of the Charging Year in which the payment under this sub-paragraph
is payable;




 









 






	 	 	T is equal to the aggregate of the turnover of the Appointed Business of all of the
companies holding an Appointment under Chapter I of Part II of the 1991 Act as shown in
their accounting statements prepared under paragraph 4 of Condition F for the financial year
ending 12 months before the start of the Charging Year in which the payment under this
sub-paragraph is payable
	 	 	PROVIDED THAT if, in respect of any Charging Year to which sub-paragraph (c) above applies,
the Secretary of State issues to the Director any direction or directions under section
37(8) of the Water Act 2003, which requires or require it to recover under this Condition
any amount or amounts greater than that produced by the calculation in sub-paragraph (c)
above, the amount of that excess shall also be recoverable under this sub-paragraph (9).”






	4.	 	At the beginning of paragraph 3, the heading is amended to read:
	 
	 	 	“Limits on renewal fee, special fee and additional fee applied to Ofwat”
	 
	5.	 	After paragraph 3 there is inserted:
	 
	 	 	“4. In this Condition “the 1991 Act” means the Water Industry Act 1991.”




Philip Fletcher
34035.

#### GARNER v. GARNER.

Submitted September 15, 1978

Decided October 4, 1978

Rehearing denied October 25, 1978.

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

This contempt action arises from a divorce in which possession of the parties’ personal property was put in issue, but not specifically awarded by the jury. The final judgment, entered by the trial court several weeks later, added to the jury verdict giving the house and car to the wife: "All the balance of the property is awarded to the [husband].” When the wife refused to turn over the personal property, he brought this contempt action. The contempt court awarded him only the stereo, color television, and riding mower. He appeals, seeking the furniture, pots and pans, and other household goods on the strength of the trial court’s judgment in the divorce case. We affirm.

It is clear that the personal property award added to the jury’s verdict by the court in its final judgment was improper. Code Ann. § 110-111; *Bradley v. Bradley,*233 Ga. 83 (210 SE2d 1) (1974); Fried *v. Fried,*208 Ga. 861 (69 SE 862) (1952). Since the trial court was not authorized to award any additional property to the husband after the jury’s verdict,1and the evidence, although conflicting in part, tended to show that most of the personal property was purchased by the wife or given to her by her husband or her mother, we fail to see how the husband has been harmed by the trial court’s ruling in the contempt case giving him only these three items. Because he has failed to show any harm and the wife has not complained of the award of this property to the husband by cross appeal, we affirm the trial court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hill, J., who is disqualified.*

*447*Word, Cook & Word, Reuben M. Word,*for appellant.

*Johnson & Beckham, William P. Johnson,*for appellee.

1

The trial court may interpret the divorce decree in deciding the contempt issue before him. E.g., *Nolan v. Moore,*241 Ga. 156 (244 SE2d 10) (1978); *Berman v. Berman,*239 Ga. 443 (238 SE2d 27) (1977). The wife asserts that the award of the house included an award of the personal property within it.
#### Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6513.

Entry No. 2861/1-2, etc.

Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, October 15, 1941, etc.

Certified October 16, 1941, etc.

Entered at Boston, Mass., November 24, 1941, etc.

(Decided November 14, 1946)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been,, submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by th£ appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
exv10w16



 





Exhibit 10.16




AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN

UTIX, INC. AND MARK POYER



This Amendment (“Amendment”) is hereby entered into by and between Utix Group, Inc. f/k/a Corporate
Sports Incentives, Inc. d/b/a Utix Corporation, Inc., (“Utix” or the “Company”) and Mark L. Pover
(the “Executive”).



WHEREAS, Utix and Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”)
effective January 23, 2006.



WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement.



WHEREAS, any terms in initial capital letters or all capital letters used as a defined term but not
defined in this First Amendment, shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant and promises contained in this Amendment
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:





	 	1.	 	Section V of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to adjust the annual base
salary to $210,000, to be made effective November 1, 2006.
	 
	 	2.	 	Section X, XII and XIII of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to replace all
instances of nine (9) months with twelve (12) months, and all instances of twelve (12)
months with twenty-one (21) months.
	 
	 	3.	 	Correction of ISO Agreement
	 
	 	 	 	The Company shall correct the vesting terms of the Executive Incentive Stock Option
Agreement in accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement and grant additional
incentive stock options to the executive in an amount equal to 1.5% of the fully diluted
shares of the Company following the Series B Preferred Stock Offering less 70,000 incentive
stock options.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the 14th Day of
November, 2006.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	UTIX GROUP, INC.	 	 	 	Mark L. Pover (“Executive”)	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Tony Roth
 

	 	 
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Mark L. Pover
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Tony Roth

Title: President & CEO
	 	 	 	 	 	Name: Mark L. Pover
No. 42068.

#### Protest 969954-G of A. C. Brode (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Zeiss*v. *United States*(T. D. 49263) the merchandise in question was held dutiable as telescopes at 45 percent under paragraph 228 (b) as claimed.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Awareness month concludes with pinwheel parade at DSCC

By Craig M. RaderDLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The Defense Supply Center Columbus Morale, Welfare and Recreation’s Child Development Center hosted a pinwheel parade May 1 to recognize the conclusion of April as Child Abuse Prevention Month and Month of the Military Child. After walking around the block, participants “planted” their pinwheels near the CDC’s main entrance. 

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MMWR L&MChild Abuse Prevention MonthPinwheel ParadeResiliency L&MCulture L&M
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1341 V

Filed: August 21, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

MAIA MERIN

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY , for petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On August 31, 2018

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder inju ry related to vaccine

administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a resu lt of an influenza vaccine received on October 20,

2017 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office

of Special Masters.

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned

agrees that the iden tified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 10 0 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa (2012 ).2

On August 21, 2019

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that petitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent agrees that petitioner suffered a Table SIRVA. Id. at 5

. Respondent further agrees that the statutory six month sequela require ment has been

satisfi ed

. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the

undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
No. 74-5774.

#### Jackson *v.*McCune, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9463]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2006-17]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a certain petition seeking 
relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this 
notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, 
this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this 
notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is 
intended to affect the legal status of any petition or its final 
disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before June 6, 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT DMS Docket Number 
FAA-2007-26253 by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Web Site: http://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for 
submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
    <bullet> Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    <bullet> Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401, 
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the 
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to http://dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL-
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tyneka Thomas (202) 267-7626 or 
Frances Shaver (202) 267-9681, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 9, 2007.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2006-26253.
    Petitioner: Ogdensburg Bridge & Port Authority.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 139.319.
    Description of Relief Sought: To allow Ogdensburg Bridge & Port 
Authority to operate without meeting the requirement for aircraft 
rescue and fire fighting equipment manned and ready to respond for each 
scheduled landing of a plane with 9 or more passengers.

[FR Doc. E7-9463 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
<PAGE>   1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

                                  FORM 10-K/A

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Norma B. Carter, their true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and revocation, for
them and in their name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign
Vlasic Foods International Inc.'s Form 10-K/A Annual Report to the Securities
and Exchange Commission for the Fiscal Year ended August 1, 1999, and any
amendments thereto, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may lawfully
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                        VLASIC FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature                                    Dated as of April 26, 2000
---------                                    --------------------------
<S>                                          <C>
     /s/ Robert T. Blakely                        /s/ Donald J. Keller
------------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Robert T. Blakely                            Donald J. Keller

     /s/ Robert F. Bernstock                      /s/ Lawrence C. Karlson
------------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Robert F. Bernstock                          Lawrence C. Karlson

     /s/ Morris A. Cohen                          /s/ Shaun F. O'Malley
------------------------------------         -----------------------------------
Morris A. Cohen                              Shaun F. O'Malley

     /s/ Tristram C. Colket, Jr.
------------------------------------
Tristram C. Colket, Jr.
</TABLE>
# C_2012217EN.01001003.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others

(Case C-232/12)

2012/C 217/21

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fastweb SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni and Others

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are the Community provisions in the sector, and in particular the provisions of Directive No 2002/20/EC, (1) to be interpreted as precluding the national rules referred to, in particular Law No 266 of 2005, as those provisions are actually applied by regulation included.

1

---

(1)  Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive); OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21.

1

---
# C_2013171EN.01000902.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/9

---

Appeal brought on 20 August 2012 by Tibor Szarvas against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 26 June 2012 in Case T-129/12 Tibor Szarvas v Hungary

(Case C-389/12 P)

2013/C 171/16

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Tibor Szarvas (represented by: M. Katona, ügyvéd)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Hungary

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 7 March 2013 the Court of Justice of the European Union dismissed the appeal and ordered the applicant to bear his own costs.

---
March 30, 1960

Reap. Dec. 9651.

reappraisements R59/12921 and R59/12922.

#### Peerless Camera Stores Corp. *v.*United States,

rehearing motion granted

Motion by plaintiff.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of E-City Software, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
C. Robinson, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


     William C. Robinson
     -------------------
     /s/

     Name: William C. Robinson
     Title: Chief Executive Officer
     Date: February 13, 2004


A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise adopting the  signature
that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.