alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
King County 

Dow Constantine 

King County Executive 

401 Fifth Avenue, Suite 800 

Seattle, WA 98104-1818 

206-263-9600 Fax 206-296-0194 

TrY Relay: 711 

www.kingcounty.gov 

May 14,2015 

The Honorable Anthony R. F oxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable Penny Pritzker 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

1401 Constitution Ave. NW 

Washington, D.C. 20230 

Dear Secretaries F oxx, Kerry and Pritzker: 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

U.S. Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 · 

A recent white paper commissioned by the Partnership for Open & Fair Skies found that, over 

the last 10 years, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways, and Emirates Airline have received at least $42 

billion in government subsidies and other unfair benefits in violation of Open Skies policy. 

U.S. Open Skies policy is predicated on a level playing field. The subsides such as interest free 

loans, equity infusions, ~nd passenger fee exemptions, to name a few, undermine fair 

competition and will result in a significant shift in market share to the Gulf carriers' advantage. 

Rather than fuel economic activity and growth, the routes that Gulf carriers operate to the U.S. 

have not meaningfully increased passenger traffic. This threatens the U.S. airline industry, highpaying aviation jobs, and communities throughout the United States. It is estimated that every 

flight lost or forgone by a U.S. carrier because of Gulf subsides will result in a net loss of more 

than 800 U.S. jobs. 

I urge the U.S. government to request consultations about Gulf airline subsidization through the 

existing Open Skies agreements to ensure fair and equal competition. The U.S. government 

should also immediately freeze the introduction of new passenger service by the Gulf carriers 

during these consultations. 

King County is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 

and complies with the Americans with Disabilitites Act 
Secretaries Foxx, Kerry, and Pritzker 

May 14,2015 

Page2 

This isn't just about fairness~ It is about maintaining the economic prosperity of our U.S. airlines, 

businesses, and communities. 

I appreciate your attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Dow Constantine 

King County Executive
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_ __ ___________________

NO. 09

- 18

- 00250

- CR

___ ___________________

DAVID KENNETH LOCY

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________________ _______________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 9th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 18

- 04

- 05315

- CR

________________________________________ ________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 19, 2018, the trial court sentenced David Kenneth Locy in Trial

C ause Number 18

- 04

- 05315

- CR

. Locy filed a notice of appeal on June 22, 2018

. On

July 18, 2018, Locy filed a motion for new trial. T he trial court granted a motion for

new trial on puni shment on August 24, 2018, while it maintained plenary power over

the case. See Tex. R. App. P. 21.8(a). On August 28 , 2018, we notified the parties

that unless our jurisdiction over the appeal was established, the appeal would be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. No reply has been filed.2

The notice of appeal invoked the Court's appellate juri sdiction to review a

judgment that has been vacated. The Court finds it lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISS ED.

________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON

Justice

Submitted on September 18, 2018

Opinion Delivered September 19, 2018

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
March 20, 1942

No. 47017.

#### Protests 998525-G, etc., of Theo. L. Stern & Co., Inc.

Government’s application for rehearing denied.
# C_2013225EN.01005303.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/53

---

Appeal brought on 29 November 2012 by Doru Cristian Ioanovici against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 25 September 2012 in Case T-313/12: Ioanovici v Commission

(Case C-568/12 P)

2013/C 225/96

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Doru Cristian Ioanovici (represented by: R. Neagu, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 27 June 2013 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6067

SHAWN CRAWFORD ALLEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN JAKE, Acting Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-598) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Dee Morrissey, Jonathan Stanley David, MORRISSEY, HERSHNER & JACOBS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Shawn Crawford Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Allen v. Jake , No. CA-97-598 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA leaders meet with industry partners, discuss engagement strategies

By Dianne Ryder

                Fort Belvoir, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

industryassociationsclothing and textilesnonprofit
No. 65805.

#### Kwan Yuen Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 287285-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

*543Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rattancore handkerchief boxes the same as the kleenex boxes the subject of *Quon Quon Company*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2038), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

June 9, 1944

No. 49484.

#### Petition 6362-R of Chilewich Sons & Co., Inc. (William J. Oberle, Inc.) (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It appeared in this case that a shipment of hides consigned to New York was invoiced at 10 cents per pound. For reasons of safety the vessel was ordered to proceed to New Orleans instead of New York, and that while the merchandise was still at sea it was purchased by petitioner,- under permit, at a price of 14 cents per pound. From the testimony of the president of the brokerage firm who handled the entry at New Orleans it appeared that as a result of many such diversions of shipments the customs brokerage capacity at that port was severely overburdened; that he had received, with the invoice and other papers from an associate customs brokerage firm in New York, a form which indicated that the price had advanced and he had also received a separate communication from the New York firm stating that a subsequent order had been placed for the same kind of merchandise at the 14 cent price; that due to a shortage of manpower and abnormal pressure of business the information in the papers was overlooked, the separate communication not being matched with the entry, and entry was therefore made at the invoice price of 10 cents per pound. Government counsel, at the close of final hearing in the case, stated that he had talked with the examiner and appraiser who passed the merchandise and also the customs agent investigating it, and their opinion was unanimous that the entrant’s reputation for honesty and integrity was of the highest and that the entry in this case, was so made due to the pressure of business. The court was of the opinion that the record negatives any conclusion that entry at a less value than that found upon appraisement was intentional. Petition was therefore granted.
Exhibit 10.3
                                                                    ------------

116 Newark Avenue Corporation
30 Montgomery Street
Jersey City, New Jersey 07302

Attention: Mr. Frank Guarini


Dear Sirs:

     Reference is hereby made to (i) the Guaranty  dated as of November 30, 2005
(the "Guaranty") by Polystick U.S. Corporation (the "Guarantor") in favor of 116
Newark Avenue  Corporation  ("Newark") and (ii) the Pledge Agreement dated as of
November 30, 2005 (the "Pledge Agreement") between the Guarantor and Newark.

     This letter shall evidence the consent of the Guarantor that each reference
to the Note contained in the Guaranty and the Pledge Agreement shall be deemed a
reference  to the Amended  and  Restated  Promissory  Note dated the date hereof
executed to Newark by GSV, Inc. The Guarantor  hereby  acknowledged and confirms
the full force and effect of the Guaranty and the Pledge Agreement.


                                        Very truly yours,

                                        POLYSTICK U.S. CORPORATION



                                        By:
(Reap. Dec. 9654)

#### Fontana Bros. *v.*United States

Entry No. 891149.

(Decided April 7, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Gochran DouTj,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

This appeal for a reappraisement pertains to the proper dutiable value of certain brass-plated luggage locks imported from West Germany.

The case has been submitted for decision upon an oral stipulation of the parties hereto wherein it has been agreed that said locks, which were appraised at $9.36 per gross, net packed, on the bases of foreign and export values, should properly have been appraised at $8 per gross, net packed, on the same valuation bases.

Predicated on the agreed facts of record, I find and hold that foreign and export values, as defined in section 402(c) and 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(c) and (d)), as modified by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, are the proper bases for determining the value of the brass-plated luggage locks in controversy and that such value is $8 per gross, net packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9539]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket T-3-2007]

Foreign-Trade Zone 7 - - Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, Application for 
Temporary/Interim Manufacturing Authority, Merck Sharpe & Dohme Quimica 
De Puerto Rico, Inc., (Pharmaceutical Products), Caguas, Puerto Rico

    An application has been submitted to the Executive Secretary of the 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) by the Puerto Rico Industrial 
Development Company (PRIDCO), grantee of FTZ 7, requesting temporary/
interim manufacturing (T/IM) authority within FTZ 7 at the MOVA 
Pharmaceutical Corporation (MOVA) facility in Caguas, Puerto Rico, on 
behalf of Merck Sharp & Dohme Quimica De Puerto Rico, Inc. (MSDQ). The 
application was filed on May 10, 2007.
    The MOVA facility (650 employees, 250,000 sq. ft.) is located at 
State Road 1, Km 34.8, within the Villa Blanca Industrial Park in 
Caguas (Site 1, Parcel 2). T/IM procedures would be used for 
pharmaceutical manufacturing involving two products, MK-431A and 
sitagliptin (HTSUS 3004.90 and 2933.59) on behalf of MSDQ for the U.S. 
market and export. Foreign components that would be used in the 
manufacturing process (up to 25[percnt] of total content) include 
sitagliptin, metformin hydrochloride, enamine amide and butyl josphos 
(duty rates of 3.7 to 6.5[percnt]). MSDQ has also submitted a request 
for permanent FTZ manufacturing authority (which will be docketed with 
the Board separately).
    FTZ procedures would exempt MSDQ from Customs duty payments on 
foreign components used in production for export to non-NAFTA 
countries. For domestic and NAFTA markets, MSDQ could select the duty 
rate that applies to the finished product (duty-free to 6.5[percnt]) 
for the components used in production when the finished products are 
entered for U.S. consumption from the zone. The application indicates 
that the company would also realize duty deferral and certain 
logistical/supply chain savings.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
(original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board's Executive 
Secretary at the following address: Office of the Executive Secretary, 
Room 2111, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230. The closing period for receipt of comments is 
June 18, 2007.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Foreign-Trade Zones Board's Executive Secretary at 
the address listed above. For further information, contact Christopher 
Kemp at: [email protected], or (202) 482-0862.

    Dated: May 10, 2007.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9539 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
```
# C_2013009EN.01003001.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/30

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 3 October 2012 — Jan Sneller v DAS Nederlandse Rechtsbijstand Verzekeringsmaatschappij NV

(Case C-442/12)

2013/C 9/49

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jan Sneller

Applicant:

Defendant: DAS Nederlandse Rechtsbijstand Verzekeringsmaatschappij NV

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 4(1) of Directive 87/344/EEC (1) allow a legal expenses insurer which stipulates in its policies that legal assistance in inquiries or proceedings will in principle be provided by employees of the insurer also to stipulate that the costs of legal assistance provided by a lawyer or legal representative chosen freely by the insured person will be covered only if the insurer takes the view that the handling of the case must be subcontracted to an external legal representative? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 4(1) of Directive 87/344/EEC (1) allow a legal expenses insurer which stipulates in its policies that legal assistance in inquiries or proceedings will in principle be provided by employees of the insurer also to stipulate that the costs of legal assistance provided by a lawyer or legal representative chosen freely by the insured person will be covered only if the insurer takes the view that the handling of the case must be subcontracted to an external legal representative?

1

| 2. | Will the answer to Question 1 differ depending on whether or not legal assistance is compulsory in the inquiry or proceedings concerned? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Will the answer to Question 1 differ depending on whether or not legal assistance is compulsory in the inquiry or proceedings concerned?

---

(1)  Council Directive 87/344/EEC of 22 June 1987 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to legal expenses insurance (OJ 1987 L 185, p. 77).

1

---
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11        Statement re: computation of per share earnings

                  The following table reconciles the weighted average shares
outstanding and the income available to common shareholders used for basic and
diluted earnings per share:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Year Ended December 31,
                                                                 -----------------------
                                                         2000              1999             1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>               <C>               <C>
Weighted average number of common shares
         Outstanding used in basic earnings per
         Common Share calculation                     2,133,906         2,133,906         1,536,821
Dilutive effect of stock options                              0                 0                14

Weighted average number of shares outstanding
         adjusted for effect of dilutive securities
         used in diluted EPS calculation              2,133,906         2,133,906         1,536,835

Net income                                           $1,138,577        $  711,241      $    672,264

Basic earnings per common share                      $      .53        $      .33      $        .44

Diluted earnings per common share                    $      .53        $      .33      $        .44
</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

March 18, 1942

No. 47012.

#### Protest 78580-K of Gimbel Bros., Inc. (New York).

*478Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of knit wool wearing apparel valued at more than $2 per pound and of the same character as that involved in *United States*v. *International Clearing House*(T. D. 48416). In accordance therewith the claim at 50 cents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1114 (d) was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

April 27, 1950

No. 54279.

#### Dutch Cheese Importers et al. *v.*United States,

protests 23106-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline,. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Edam process-cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Dutch Cheese Importers Co.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1197), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEnabling Electric Aircraft_Applications and ApproachesClimate concerns have instigated serious research for weight-critical batteries to enable what are termed EVs, electric vehicles, initially for ground transportation. This research has advanced to the point where, at the system level, parity with combustion engines, via vehicle weight and drag reductions to reduce battery requirements, along with continued battery research, can conceivably be achieved in less than 10 years.. Concomitantly, renewable electric generation, which would enable essentially emission-less transportation, has via cost reductions, efficiency improvements and storage research advanced to the point of producing 25% of current electrical generation and 62% of new generation capability with continued rapid cost reductions and consequent rapid further adoption projected. The present report examines the resultant electric aircraft possibilities and opportunities including technologies to reduce requisite battery size and weight via airframe performance improvements, the benefits of electric propulsion and the enablement of a massive new aeronautics market for affordable, safe personal air vehicles that operate off of local streets.Document ID20180006183Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBushnell, Dennis M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 9, 2018Publication DateAugust 1, 2018Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-30493NASA/TM-2018-220088L-20935Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 736466.01.01.07.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180006183.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50496

 

JENNIFER M. TRAHAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

THE COUNTY OF EL PASO,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

 

June 11, 1996

Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

After considering the arguments of counsel, the briefs, and

the record, this Court affirms. There is no challenge to the

wording of the jury charge. This Court concludes that the findings

that plaintiff did not work in a bona fide administrative capacity,

that defendant failed to pay her required overtime wages, that it

willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, and that plaintiff

was paid $50,000 less than she was due under the Fair Labor
2

Standards Act during the three years prior to filing suit were all

adequately supported by the evidence. Further, the district court

did not err in awarding plaintiff an additional $50,000 as

liquidated damages. No reversible error is demonstrated.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.