alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013046EN.01001102.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) lodged on 15 October 2012 — SKP v Ján Bríla

(Case C-460/12)

2013/C 46/20

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Referring court

Krajský súd v Prešove

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SKP, k.s.

Appellant:

Respondent: Ján Bríla

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Article 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in this case, preventing a national court, when adjudicating, on the application of a supplier, on a time-barred claim against a consumer from taking limitation of the action into account of its own motion, even when unfair contract terms are being enforced against the consumer? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Article 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts to be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in this case, preventing a national court, when adjudicating, on the application of a supplier, on a time-barred claim against a consumer from taking limitation of the action into account of its own motion, even when unfair contract terms are being enforced against the consumer?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the negative, are Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts to be interpreted as meaning that the court must, of its own motion, advise the consumer as to his right to argue that the creditor’s claim is time-barred? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, are Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts to be interpreted as meaning that the court must, of its own motion, advise the consumer as to his right to argue that the creditor’s claim is time-barred?

---

(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29

1

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Ohio National Guard to Deploy

By Dawn SuttonLand & Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
About 35 Soldiers from the Ohio National Guard's 174th Air Defense Artillery Brigade, headquartered in Columbus, are deploying to the National Capital Region in Washington D.C.

The public is invited to the call to duty ceremony for Task Force Guthrie Greys at 10 a.m. Thursday, June 15 at Reynoldsburg United Methodist Church,1636 Graham Road, Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068.

To view the full press release, visit the Ohio National Guard website at:http://ong.ohio.gov/information/press_releases/2017/170613-Log21.pdf

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MDeployer L&MDeployment L&MPeople & Culture
(Reap. Dec. 8447)

Entry Nos. 754747; 824216.

#### Bluefries New York, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 8, 1955)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*Warren E.*Burger, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

Plaintiff herein did not appear when the above-enumerated appeals for a reappraisement were called for hearing.

The rules of this court provide in part that—

> 5. * * * Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it shall be deemed submitted and shall be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

In conformity with the requirements of the rule, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2013377EN.01002101.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/21

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 November 2013 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case F-63/12) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Compliance with a judgment - Costs - Reimbursement of costs - Reimbursement of the sum paid by way of recoverable costs following a judgment annulling in part the judgment by which the applicant was ordered to pay those costs)

2013/C 377/47

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carlo de Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Nuvoli and F. Martin, Agents, A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the letters by which the defendant refuses to reimburse, following the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-37/10 P De Nicola v EIB, which annulled in part the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-55/08 De Nicola v EIB, the EUR 6 000 which the applicant had paid to the defendant by way of recoverable costs following the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-55/08 DEP.

De Nicola

EIB

De Nicola

EIB

DEP

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decisions of 4 and 25 May 2012 of the European Investment Bank; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decisions of 4 and 25 May 2012 of the European Investment Bank;

| 2. | Orders the European Investment bank to pay Mr De Nicola the sum of EUR 6 000, with default interest as from 29 April 2012. The default interest rate must be calculated on the basis of the rate set by the European Central Bank for its principal refinancing operations applicable over the period concerned, increased by two points; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Investment bank to pay Mr De Nicola the sum of EUR 6 000, with default interest as from 29 April 2012. The default interest rate must be calculated on the basis of the rate set by the European Central Bank for its principal refinancing operations applicable over the period concerned, increased by two points;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 4. | Orders the European Investment Bank to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr De Nicola. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Investment Bank to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr De Nicola.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012, p. 16.

1

---
----

| VitalStream      Holdings, Inc.                        | Nevada              |
|--------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
| VitalStream,      Inc.                                 | Delaware            |
| VitalStream  Broadcasting      Corporation   | Nevada              |
| Playstream,      Inc.                                  | Nevada              |
| VitalStream      Advertising Services, Inc.            | Nevada              |
| CO      Space, Inc.                                    | Delaware            |
| CO      Space Services, LLC                            | Delaware            |
| CO      Space Properties, LLC                          | Delaware            |
| CO      Space Construction, LLC                        | Delaware            |
| CO      Space Services Texas, LP                       | Delaware            |
| CO      Space Properties Texas, LP                     | Delaware            |
| Internap      (Bermuda) Limited                        | Bermuda             |
| Internap      Network Services U.K. Limited            | United      Kingdom |
| Internap      Network Services B.V.                    | Netherlands         |
| Internap      Technologies (Bermuda) Limited           | Bermuda             |
| Internap      Technologies B.V.                        | Netherlands         |
| Internap      Network Services (HK) Limited            | Hong      Kong      |
| Internap      Network Services (Singapore) Pte Limited | Singapore           |
| Internap      Network Services (Australia) Ltd.        | Australia           |
| Internap      Network Services Canada                  | Canada              |
| Internap      Japan Co., Ltd.*                         | Japan               |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001056758
<NAME> NEBRASKA BOOK COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,450,887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,424,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,899
<INVENTORY>                                 61,809,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            92,534,795
<PP&E>                                      36,558,620
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,797,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             166,154,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,236,560
<BONDS>                                    161,786,446
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                 (30,676,716)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               166,154,812
<SALES>                                    265,290,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           265,290,230
<CGS>                                      164,921,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              164,921,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            76,378,766
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               140,927
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,113,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,735,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,844,744
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,890,716
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,890,716
<EPS-BASIC>                                     18,907
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   18,907


</TABLE>
(A. R. D. 95)

#### Arbor Mfg. Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 807831, etc.

Second Division, Appellate Term

(Decided December 22, 1958)

*Jordan & Klingaman (Jacob L. Klingaman*of counsel) for the appellants.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. -Spector,*trial attorney), for the appellee.

Before Lawrence, Rao, and Ford, Judges

Lawrence, Judge:

Tliis application for review of Reap. Dec. 9203 (41 Cnst. Ct. 506), which covered the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, having been formally abandoned, is dismissed.
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative

#  Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Aug, 2018

**Description:**
The WLCI is a long-term science based effort to assess and enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitats at a landscape scale in southwest Wyoming, while facilitating responsible development through local collaboration and partnerships.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Environment & Energy

**Creator:**    	    Natural Resources Conservation Service,     	    National Park Service,     	    USDA Forest Service,     	    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,     	    U.S. Geological Survey,     	    Bureau of Land Management

**Language:**    	    English

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/4f4e476fe4b07f02db47e19b?community=Wyoming+Landscape+Conservation+Initiative

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.wlci.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (2 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. John Brian CAMPBELL, Appellant.

No. 72455.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.

July 31, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 30, 1998.

Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 24, 1998.

Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*398Before CRAHAN, C.J., and HOFF and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

John Brian Campbell (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute in violation of section 195.211 RSMo 1994 for which he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detaile_d opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
##### 



Exhibit 21.1

CORPORATE STRUCTURE
As of December 15, 2003

The following sets forth the subsidiaries of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. but
excludes certain dormant and other subsidiaries not meaningful for presentation
herein.

Asteria Company
Astracast GmbH
Astracast Plc
Bathcraft Inc.
BB Investments Ltd.
Eljer Industries, Inc.
Eljer Plumbingware, Inc.
Gatsby Spas, Inc.
Jacuzzi (Ireland) Ltd.
Jacuzzi Asia Pacific Pty Ltd. (Namesaver)
Jacuzzi Brands, Inc.
Jacuzzi do Brazil Industria e Commercio Ltda.
Jacuzzi Europe S.P.A.
Jacuzzi France SAS
Jacuzzi Inc.
Jacuzzi (Chili) S.A.
Jacuzzi Investments Ltd.
Jacuzzi Leisure Products Inc.
Jacuzzi Singapore Pte Ltd
Jacuzzi Spain, S.R.L. (Namesaver)
Jacuzzi UK Group plc
Jacuzzi Universal S.A. (49%)
Jacuzzi Whirlpool Bath, Inc. (Namesaver)
Jacuzzi Whirlpool GmbH
JBI Holdings Limited
JUSI Holdings, Inc.
KLI, Inc.
Les Aeliers de la Motte S.A.
PH Property Development Company
Pinco 1805 Ltd.
Redmont, Inc.
Rexair Holdings, Inc.
Rexair, Inc.
Silverdale Ceramics Ltd.
Spring Ram Bathrooms PLC
Spring Ram Corporation Overseas Ltd.
SSP Holdings Ltd.
Stainless Steel Products Ltd.
Sundance Spas, Inc.
The Spring Ram Corporation PLC
USI American Holdings, Inc.
USI Atlantic Corp.
USI Canada Inc.
USI Capital, Inc.
USI Global Corp.
USI Mayfair Limited
USI Overseas Holdings Limited
USI Plumbing PLC
USI Properties, Inc.
Val Industria e Commercio Ltda.
Zurco, Inc.
Zurn Export, Inc.
Zurn Industries Limited
Zurn Industries, Inc.
Zurn Pex, Inc.
33912.

#### KRONITZ et al. v. FIFTH AVENUE DANCE STUDIO, INC.

Marshall, Justice.

The appellee, a New York corporation, sued the resident appellants in the State Court of DeKalb County to recover on an authenticated New York judgment. The appellants filed defenses purportedly based upon the Georgia Foreign Money — Judgments Recognition Act, Code Ann. Ch. 110-13 (Ga. L. 1975, p. 479 et seq.), and specifically Code Ann. § 110-1304 (Ga. L. 1975, pp. 479, 480). In response to the appellee’s motion for summary judgment, the appellants filed a motion requesting permission to offer further testimony. The trial court judge never ruled on the appellants’ motion, indicating that "it would make no difference what defenses or what evidence you have, I am still going to recognize the New York judgment.” In the final order appealed from, entered April 19, 1978, the trial court judge held that the aforesaid Act is unconstitutional, stated that he gave no *399consideration to it and accepted no defense with respect to Code Ann. § 110-1304, and granted the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. *Held:*

Submitted August 4, 1978

Decided October 18, 1978.

*B. W. Crecelius,*for appellants.

*Taylor, Morris & Hotz, George T. Lamb,*for appellee.

Even if the April 19,1978, final order appealed from had revealed the grounds of the trial court’s holding of the Foreign Money — Judgments Recognition Act to be unconstitutional, the constitutionality of that law, if "drawn in question” (Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV, Ga. Const, of 1976; Code Ann. § 2-3104), need not be ruled on by this court, because that law is not applicable in the case sub judice. The Act expressly applies to judgments of "foreign” states, which are defined so as to exclude sister states. Code Ann. §§ 110-1301,110-1303 (Ga. L. 1975, pp. 479,480); *Collins v. Peacock,*147 Ga. App. 424 (1) (1978).

Because the case was tried by the parties and the judge on the erroneous premise that the defenses were being filed and considered vis-a-vis this inapplicable statute, we reverse the order ruling on the constitutionality of that Act and granting summary judgment, and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on the issue of whether any of the defenses raised are valid under the Full-Faith-and-Credit Clause of the U. S. Constitution. Art. IV, Sec. I (Code § 1-401).

*Judgment reversed and remanded.*

*All the Justices concur.*
No. 74-836.

#### Gutwein et al. *v.*Easton Publishing Co.

Ct. App. Md. Certiorari denied.
EPA Registration

83520 -7

Volume 4Pages 3-10 - * Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment *
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9424]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5763]


Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice

Closed Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--Overseas Security Advisory Council on June 6, 2007 at the 
U.S. Secret Service, Washington, DC. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(7)(E), it has been determined that the meeting will be closed 
to the public. The meeting will focus on an examination of corporate 
security policies and procedures and will involve extensive discussion 
of proprietary commercial information that is considered privileged and 
confidential, as well as discussion of law enforcement investigative 
techniques and procedures. The agenda will include updated committee 
reports, a global threat overview, and other matters relating to 
private sector security policies and protective programs and the 
protection of U.S. business information overseas.
    For more information, contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, 
phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated: May 7, 2007.
Patrick D. Donovan,
Acting Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, Department of 
State.
 [FR Doc. E7-9424 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
# A Reminder

...

The Department of the Interior is in the process of developing specific standards to ensure that oil and gas operations on the Alaskan OCS are conducted safely and responsibly. At the outset of this rulemaking process, DOI is engaging interested parties and stakeholders in Alaska to discuss the scope and objectives of this effort. BSEE and BOEM are workingjointly on this rulemaking.

DOI is accepting and considering written public comments electronically. For consideration they must be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal (**http://www.regulations.gov**), docket number BOEM

-2013

- 0035 (available beginning Thursday, June 6, 2013). The deadline to receive comments is Friday, **June 21,**  **2013** (12:00 midnight, EST / 8:00 pm, ADT). Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask DOI (prominently at the beginning of your submission) to withhold your personal identifying information from public view, DOI cannot guarantee that it will be able to do so. DOI will not consider anonymous comments.