alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MBT Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
     /s/ John L. SkibskiJohn L. SkibskiChief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Westchester County Correction Officers Benevolent Association, Inc., Respondent, v County of Westchester, Appellant. (Matter No. 1.) County of Westchester, Appellant, v Westchester County Correction Officers Benevolent Association, Inc., Respondent. (Matter No. 2.)

[699 NYS2d 444]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 2304 to quash certain administrative subpoenas (Matter No. 1), and a related action, in effect, to enjoin the Westchester County Correction Officers Benevolent Association, Inc., from challenging the issuance of the subject administrative subpoenas (Matter No. 2), the County of Westchester appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered August 21, 1998, which granted the petition in *243Matter No. 1, and (2) an order of the same court, also entered August 21, 1998, which denied its motion in Matter No. 2, in effect, for a preliminary injunction.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the petition of the Westchester County Correction Officers Benevolent Association, Inc. (hereinafter the respondent), in Matter No. 1 to quash the administrative subpoenas issued by the appellant, the County of Westchester, and properly denied the appellant’s motion in Matter No. 2, in effect, for a preliminary injunction precluding the respondent from not complying with the subpoenas. In issuing the subpoenas, the appellant failed to comply with the procedure prescribed by Workers’ Compensation Law § 300.10 (c), which is made applicable by the parties’ collective bargaining agreement to the correction compensation hearings at issue. Pursuant to the statute, the appellant, as an employer, may issue a subpoena to a claimant’s treating physician whose reports or records are presented at the hearing. However, the subpoena may issue only upon the nonappearance of the physician at the first adjournment for that purpose. We find that the routine issuance of subpoenas to these physicians prior to any attempt by the appellant to arrange a voluntary appearance, as had been the past practice, violates the statute and impedes the well-established remedial goals of the Workers’ Compensation Law *(see generally, Matter of Johannesen v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preservation & Dev.,*84 NY2d 129; *Matter of Tallini v Martino & Son,*58 NY2d 392).

We have not considered those portions of the appellant’s appendix which were not before the Supreme Court and are, therefore, dehors the record on appeal *(see, Iglesias v Inland Freightways,*209 AD2d 479). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Liberty Group Publishing,
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
     annual period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



         Dated: March 31, 2003               /s/ Kenneth L. Serota
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Kenneth L. Serota
                                             Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.



<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Liberty Group Publishing,
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i)  the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
     annual period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
     the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



         Dated: March 31, 2003               /s/ Daniel D. Lewis
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Daniel D. Lewis
                                             Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
# C_2014151EN.01001702.xml

| 19.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 March 2014 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM — equinet Bank (EQUITER)

(Case T-47/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark EQUITER - Earlier Community word mark EQUINET - Relative ground for refusal - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons))

2014/C 151/22

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin (Italy)) (represented by: P. Pozzi, G. Ghisletti and F. Braga, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: equinet Bank AG (Frankfurt am Main (Germany))

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 October 2011 (Case R 2101/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between equinet Bank AG and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 October 2011 (Case R 2101/2010-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 October 2011 (Case R 2101/2010-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Intesa Sanpaolo SpA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Intesa Sanpaolo SpA.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.12.

1

---
#### The Rike Kumler Co. *v.*United States

No. 7644.

Invoices dated Hucknall, England, September 25, 1945, etc.

Certified September 27, 1945, etc.

Entered at Dayton, Ohio, December 12, 1945, etc.

Entry Nos. 52; 55.

(Decided January 7, 1949)

*Estabrooh, Finn & McKee (Chester E. Finn*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

These are appeals for reappraisement of wool scarves imported from England.

At the trial counsel for the parties stated:

> Mr. Finn: If the court please, for the record, we would like to stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the court, that the issues in the appeals for reappraisement in this matter are the same in all material respects as the issue decided in United States vs. William S. Pitcairn Corporation, Suit Number 4513, C. A. D. 334, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised values of the merchandise involved in each of the cases herein, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities, in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States; and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise is no higher.

> *361It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

> Mb. Attster: The office of the Assistant Attorney General has examined the papers, has consulted with Mr. Dallas W. Bowyer, the Customs Appraiser at the Port of Dayton, Ohio, and is informed that this stipulation just read into the record meets the facts of the case; and under the circumstances the Assistant Attorney General agrees to the stipulation as so read.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alex Stelmak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
19th day of June 2003.


/s/ Alex Stelmak
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                               DAVOX CORPORATION

              SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OPERATIONS & CUSTOMER SERVICE

                          SEVERANCE AGREEMENT - 2000


DAVOX Corporation ("DAVOX") will provide to you the following terms and
condition of salary benefits continuation:

  (1.)   DAVOX shall provide a continuation of your base salary and medical
         benefits at DAVOX's cost, as may be in effect at the time of a
         qualifying termination as set forth in subclause 2, commencing upon the
         date of termination, for a period of six (6) months or until such time
         as you assume new employment, whichever comes first;

  (2.)   DAVOX shall provide continuation of salary and benefits as set forth in
         subclause (1) in the event your employment is terminated for the
         following reasons: (a) economic layoff; (b) downsizing of the
         Operations or Customer Service organization which results in the
         elimination of your position as Senior Vice President Operations &
         Customer Service, or (c) reorganization of the Operations or Customer
         Service organization which would require you to relocate.

Following the effective date of termination, as set forth in writing and
furnished to you by DAVOX, your employment with DAVOX shall cease and you shall
not hold yourself as an employee, agent or representative of DAVOX.

Continuation of salary and benefits shall further be subject to your compliance
with any then existing company policies and such other terms as may be in effect
between you and DAVOX pertaining to the disclosure of confidential or
proprietary information.

DAVOX has final authority to determine all questions of eligibility to receive
benefits under this arrangement and to interpret and construe the terms of this
arrangement.

Approval:


            /s/ Alphonse M. Lucchese                                3/1/00
            ---------------------------------------------           --------
            Chairman & Chief Executive Officer                      Date



            /s/ Mark Donovan                                        2/28/00
            ---------------------------------------------------     --------
            Senior Vice President Operations & Customer Service
Before the Second Division,

December 12, 1950

No. 54966.

#### National Jewelers Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 118804-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all *340material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20' each as watch movements more than *%o*of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
January 11, 1939

No. 40461.

Suit 4164.

#### United *States*v. *Kraft-Phenix Cheese Corp. et al.*

Reap. Dec. 4223 affirmed.
# C_2013225EN.01005301.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/53

---

Appeal brought on 29 November 2012 by Erusalim Baleanu against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 25 September 2012 in Case T-311/12: Baleanu v Commission

(Case C-566/12 P)

2013/C 225/94

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Erusalim Baleanu (represented by: R. Neagu, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 27 June 2013 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
#### STATE ex rel. Jonathan STEVENSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 97-KH-1691.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1998.

In re Stevenson, Jonathan; Plaintiff(s); applying for motion to enforce this Court’s Order dated November 14, 1997; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 6-03-0004; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW96 1745.

Denied. Moot. The district court has acted.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.
No. 96-5939.

#### Cotnam *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
(logo)


                        Report of Independent Accountants

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
650 Third Avenue South
Park Building
Suite 1300
Minneapolis MN 55402-4333
Telephone (612) 596 6000
Facsimile (612) 373 7160

March 5, 1999

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of Chase Manhattan Mortgage
Corporation:

We  have  examined   management's   assertion  about  Chase  Manhattan  Mortgage
Corporation's  (the "Company")  compliance with the minimum servicing  standards
("standards")  identified  in the  Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of  America's
Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for
the year  ended  December  31,  1998  included  in the  accompanying  management
assertion (see Exhibit I). The Company performs loan subservicing  functions for
the  residential  loan  servicing   portfolio  of  Chemical   Mortgage  Company.
Management  is  responsible  for the  Company's  compliance  with those  minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis for
our  opinion.  Our  examination  does not provide a legal  determination  on the
Company's compliance with the standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned  standards  as of and for the year  ended  December  31,  1998 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
No. 39127.

#### Protests 935389-G, etc., of Wm. Shaland et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record in *New York Merchandise*v. *United States*(T. D. 49171) was admitted in evidence and the protests were submitted for decision. On the record thus presented the protests were dismissed for lack of sufficient evidence.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
 
                        Consent of Independent Auditors
 
The Board of Directors
SonoSite, Inc.
   
   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-49401 and 333-74833) on Form S-8 of SonoSite, Inc. (a development
stage enterprise) of our report dated January 27, 1999, relating to the balance
sheets of SonoSite, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1998, and the related
statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders' equity for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998 and for the period from
February 1994 (inception) through December 31, 1998, which report appears in
the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc.     
 
                                          KPMG LLP
 
Seattle, Washington
   
April 7, 1999
PROMISSORY NOTE



$187,500                                           Dana  Point,  California
                                                         January  12,  2000

     FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,  the  undersigned,  Internet Golf Association, Inc. a
Nevada  corporation  ("Maker"),  hereby  promises  to pay to the order of Alster
Finance  or  assignee ("Payee"), at such place as Payee or any holder hereof may
from  time  to  time  designate,  the  principal sum of One Hundred Eighty-Seven
Thousand  Five Hundred Dollars ($187,500.00), and to pay simple interest at said
place  from  the  date hereof on the unpaid principal balance amount hereof at a
rate  of eight percent (8%) per annum.  All amounts outstanding under this Note,
including  the principal balance and any unpaid interest hereunder, shall be due
and  payable on or before March 1, 2000.  In no event shall the rate of interest
hereunder  exceed  the  maximum  interest  rate  permitted  by  applicable  law.

     Maker  and  all  endorsers, guarantors and sureties hereof hereby severally
waive  diligence,  demand,  presentment,  protection and notice of any kind, and
assent  to extensions of the time of payment, release, surrender or substitution
of  security,  or  forbearance  or  other  indulgence,  without  notice.

     Maker  may, at its option, at any time and from time to time, prepay all or
any  part  of  the  principal  balance of this Note, without penalty or premium,
provided  that  concurrently  with  each such prepayment Maker shall pay accrued
interest  on  the  principal  so  prepaid  to  the  date  of  such  prepayment.

     This Note may not be changed, modified or terminated orally, but only by an
agreement  in  writing  signed  by  the  party  to  be  charged.

     In  the event of any litigation with respect to this Note, Maker waives the
right  to  a  trial  by  jury  and  all rights of setoff and rights to interpose
counterclaims  and  cross-claims.  Maker  hereby  irrevocably  consents  to  the
jurisdiction  of  the  courts  of the State of California in connection with any
action  or  proceeding arising out of or relating to this Note.  In the event of
any cause of action brought to enforce this note, the losing party shall pay all
attorney's  fees  and  costs  of  the  other  party.

     This  Note  shall  be  governed by California law, without reference to any
choice  of  law  principles  thereof.

     INTERNET  GOLF  ASSOCIATION,  INC.

/s/ Vincent Castagnola
     _____________________________
By:  Vincent  Castagnola,  President
No. 47673.

#### Protests 802183-G, etc., of Kloeckner Steel Corp. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Wilbur-Ellis Co.*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 403, C. A. D. 47), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1604 was sustained.