alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1564 

To amend the Clean Air Act to improve the renewable fuel program by 

combining the categories of ‘‘cellulosic biofuel’’ and ‘‘advanced biofuel’’ 

into 1 technology- and feedstock-neutral category of ‘‘advanced biofuel’’, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to improve the renewable fuel 

program by combining the categories of ‘‘cellulosic 

biofuel’’ and ‘‘advanced biofuel’’ into 1 technology- and 

feedstock-neutral category of ‘‘advanced biofuel’’, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Renewable Fuel Parity 

5 Act of 2011’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1564 IS

1 SEC. 2. RENEWABLE FUEL PROGRAM. 

2 (a) DEFINITION OF ADVANCED BIOFUEL.—Section 

3 211(o)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 7545(o)(1)(B)) is amended— 

5 (1) in clause (i)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘means renewable fuel’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘means— 

8 ‘‘(I) renewable fuel’’; 

9 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

10 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(II) cellulosic biofuel’’; and 

13 (2) in clause (ii), by adding at the end the fol14 lowing: 

15 ‘‘(VIII) Other fuel derived from 

16 algae.’’. 

17 (b) RENEWABLE FUEL PROGRAM.—Section 

18 211(o)(2) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(2)) is 

19 amended— 

20 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ‘‘cellu21 losic biofuel,’’; and 

22 (2) in subparagraph (B)— 

23 (A) in clause (i)— 

24 (i) by striking subclause (III); and 

25 (ii) by redesignating subclause (IV) as 

26 subclause (III); 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 1564 IS

1 (B) in clause (ii)(III), by striking ‘‘each 

2 category (cellulosic biofuel and biomass-based 

3 diesel)’’ and inserting ‘‘the biomass-based diesel 

4 category’’; 

5 (C) by striking clause (iv); 

6 (D) by redesignating clause (v) as clause 

7 (iv); and 

8 (E) in clause (iv) (as so redesignated), by 

9 striking ‘‘clause (i)(IV)’’ and inserting ‘‘clause 

10 (i)(III)’’. 

11 (c) APPLICABLE PERCENTAGES.—Section 

12 211(o)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

13 7545(o)(3)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘, biomass-based 

14 diesel, and cellulosic biofuel’’ and inserting ‘‘and biomass15 based diesel’’. 

16 (d) WAIVERS.—Section 211(o)(7) of the Clean Air 

17 Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(7)) is amended— 

18 (1) by striking subparagraph (D); and 

19 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and 

20 (F) as subparagraphs (D) and (E), respectively. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Annual Report of Nebraska Book Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark W.
Oppegard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.



                              /s/ Mark W. Oppegard
                              --------------------------------------------------
                                  Mark W. Oppegard
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  June 26, 2008
(V. D. 79)

#### Compass Instrument & Optical Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 866128.

(Decided May 22, 1958)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant

Lawrence, Judge:

This is a valuation proceeding which arose by reason of a judgment rendered by the second division of this court in the case of *Compass Instrument & Optical Co.*v. *United States,*38 Cust. Ct. 475, Abstract 60663.

The cause of action, having been formally abandoned, is dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit
      32.1











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of DiCon Fiberoptics, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ho-Shang Lee,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/
      Ho-Shang Lee


Ho-Shang
      Lee


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


(chief
      executive and financial officer)








August
      10, 2006





This
      certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
No. 96-7743.

#### Torres *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.37


Salon Media Group names new CFO

January 9, 2008 | SAN FRANCISCO - Salon Media Group, Inc. (SLNM.OB), a leading
independent media company that publishes Salon.com, announced today the
appointment of Norman Blashka, a seasoned financial executive, as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer. Blashka will oversee all of Salon's
financial and corporate development activities, replacing Salon's former CFO,
Conrad Lowry. He will be based in Salon's New York City office.

Blashka brings over 20 years of CFO experience with public and private media and
technology companies. He joins Salon from Vizible Corp., a web-based
visualization software and social networking company, where he most recently
served as chief financial officer. Prior thereto, he served as CFO of Operative
Media, a venture-backed online advertising operations and software company. As
EVP and CFO of 24/7 Real Media, a publicly-traded global digital media company,
Blashka helped guide the company through turbulent post-bubble financial
conditions, leading its successful turnaround and managing its renewed growth
and profitability. He has also served in a variety of senior financial and
operating positions with established media companies such as Warner Amex Cable
and Cablevision Systems Corp.

Blashka is a Certified Public Accountant, earned an MBA in finance and
accounting from Columbia University, and holds a BA in economics, summa cum
laude, from SUNY New Paltz, where he currently sits on the Board of Trustees and
chairs its audit committee.

"I am excited to be joining such an outstanding organization with a rich
heritage of independent journalism and an incredible, growing audience. I look
forward to building upon Salon's financial momentum," said Blashka.

"Norman brings great experience to Salon, including his proven track record in
fund-raising, mergers and acquisitions activities, and years of hands-on
practice developing profitable media properties," added Christopher Neimeth,
President and CEO of Salon. "The knowledge he's developed from his many
successes in media startups and turnarounds is a tremendous asset for us."


ABOUT SALON MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Salon, the award-winning online news and entertainment Web site, combines
original investigative stories, breaking news, provocative personal essays and
highly respected criticism along with popular staff-written blogs about
politics, technology and culture. Salon hosts two online communities, Table Talk
and The Well, and is headquartered in San Francisco, with offices in New York
City and Washington D.C.

                                      # # #
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2021

No. 04-20-00326-CR

Leonard CHARGUALAF,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-1243-CR-A

Honorable William D. Old III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this Anders case, Appellant is preparing his pro se response but currently has no access 

to legal resources. He requests more time to prepare his response while he waits for transfer 

from a transient prison unit to a permanent one where he will have access to the unit’s legal 

department. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s pro se response is due on March 15, 

2021. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of January, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
No. 96-5966.

#### O’Brien *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 12, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00671

- CV

Stephen M. Daniels, Appellant

v.

Tony R. Bertolino, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, FI ELD , AND CARROLL

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE CARROLL

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on October 21, 2014. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ a rguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.

* Before Jimmy Carroll, Chief Justice (retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

See Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.003(b).
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-0782V 

Filed: October 31, 2016 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

IRENE DENISTON, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

v. * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder 

 * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. 

Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On June 30, 2016, Irene Deniston (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et 

seq.,

2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered right shoulder injuries 

that were caused-in-fact by an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 21, 2014. Petition at 

1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special 

Masters. 

On October 31, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “petitioner’s alleged injury is 

consistent with shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (‘SIRVA’), and that was 

caused in fact by the flu vaccine she received on October 21, 2014. Id. at 5-6. 

Respondent further agrees that no other causes for petitioner’s SIRVA were identified 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

and the records show that petitioner suffered the sequela of her injury for more than six 

months. Id. at 6. 

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
### Surface water supply of the Pacific slope of southern California

By: Harry Deyoe McGlashan

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp447

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Skibski, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John L. Skibski
-------------------------------------
John L. Skibski
Chief Financial Officer
May 8, 2007
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Immer Jonathan a/k/a Immer Perez * From the 35th District Court

a/k/a Immer Najera, of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CR22634.

Vs. No. 11-14-00320-CR * November 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1348 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide 

observance of two minutes of silence each Veterans Day. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2011 

Mr. BROWN of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. WEBB, Mr. 

INHOFE, Mr. CASEY, and Mr. BEGICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the 

nationwide observance of two minutes of silence each 

Veterans Day. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Day Moment 

5 of Silence Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OBSERVANCE OF VETERANS DAY. 

7 (a) TWO MINUTES OF SILENCE.—Chapter 1 of title 

8 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following new section: 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1348 IS

1 ‘‘§ 145. Veterans Day 

2 ‘‘The President shall each year issue a proclamation 

3 calling on the people of the United States to observe two 

4 minutes of silence on Veterans Day, beginning at 2:11 

5 p.m. eastern time, in honor of the service and sacrifice 

6 of veterans throughout the history of the Nation.’’. 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

8 for chapter 1 of title 36, United States Code, is amended 

9 by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘145. Veterans Day.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
33423.

#### MITCHELL v. KOOPU.

Jordan, Justice.

Appellant, Bobby Dwayne Mitchell, appeals an order of the DeKalb County Superior Court holding him in wilful contempt of court for failure to pay child support pursuant to an order dated November 25,1975. Appellant initiated this action by filing a Motion to Set Aside this November 25, 1975, order on the grounds that it contained a self-effectuating contempt order which violated appellant’s rights of due process and, therefore, was void on its face. Appellee, Mitchell’s former wife, answered appellant’s motion and filed an application for contempt citation. After a hearing, appellant was adjudged in wilful contempt of the November 25, 1975, order.

1. Appellant’s first enumeration of error is that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to set aside the contempt order of November 25, 1975. Appellant’s motion was filed pursuant to Code § 81A-160 and alleged that the order complained of violated his rights of due process of law. The order provided that, upon an affidavit from appellant’s former wife that appellant has failed to make his required payments, appellant would be incarcerated. This language provides for the incarceration of the appellant without any notice or hearing and is unconstitutional. *Foster v. Foster,*178 Ga. 791 (174 SE 532) (1934). The trial court erred in holding the appellant in contempt of this void order.

2. The above holding makes unnecessary a ruling on appellant’s remaining enumerations of error.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Bowles, J., who concurs in the judgment only, and Hill, J.,*
      *507
      *who dissents.*

Submitted March 24, 1978

Decided October 17, 1978

Rehearing denied November 7, 1978.

*Edward H. Kellogg, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Crowe & Manheim, Arthur Crowe, Alan C. Manheim,*for appellee.

Hill, Justice,

dissenting.

After hearing evidence of nonpayment of child support, the trial judge held the former husband in contempt of the payment requirement of the prior order; the former husband was not held in contempt of the self-executing provision of that prior order. Moreover, the self-executing provision was agreed and consented to by the former husband’s attorney. I would affirm the finding that the husband was in contempt of court without requiring a new hearing and a new order.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1366 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1366

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to broaden the special rules 
 for certain governmental plans under section 105(j) to include plans 
                 established by political subdivisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2011

 Ms. Cantwell (for herself, Mr. Crapo, and Mrs. Murray) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to broaden the special rules 
 for certain governmental plans under section 105(j) to include plans 
                 established by political subdivisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF APPLICATION OF SPECIAL RULES FOR CERTAIN 
              GOVERNMENTAL PLANS TO INCLUDE PLANS ESTABLISHED BY 
              POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 105(j)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or established by or on behalf of a 
        State or political subdivision thereof'' after ``public 
        retirement system'', and
            (2) by inserting ``or 501(c)(9)'' after ``section 115'' in 
        subparagraph (B) thereof.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to payments after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```