alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                             894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                       705
<INVENTORY>                                      5,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,009
<PP&E>                                          81,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,181
<BONDS>                                         21,057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,261
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,571
<SALES>                                         14,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,095
<CGS>                                            8,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,214)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (439)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (775)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
No. 56726.

protests 158823-K and 169946-K (A) (New York).

#### Safran & Glucksman, Inc., and Trans World Shipping Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 49450.

#### Protest 98355-K of F. W. Myers *&*Co., Inc. (Detroit).

*323Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of salted codfish similar to that passed upon in Abstract 48574. In accordance therewith it was held dutiable, as claimed, at 1)4 cents per pound under the provision for “cod * * * skinned or boned, whether or not dried” in paragraph 719(3) (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1001, par. 719 (3)), as modified by the Canadian Trade Agreement (T. D. 49752), rather than as classified, as “cod * * * prepared or preserved, not specially provided for,” at 12)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 720(b) (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1001, par. 720(b)), as modified by said trade agreement.
**Agricultural      Bank of China**

**Loan      Certificate (3)**

| Applicant                             |   | Shenzhen                BAK Battery Co., Ltd             |   | ID                card of the Applicant            |   |                                                |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Currency                              |   | RMB                                                      |   | Amount                                             |   | 30,000,000.00                                       |
| Loan                Term              |   | From                October 11, 2007 to January 25, 2010 |
| Usage                                 |   | Purchase                equipments and machines          |
| Annual                rate            |   | 7.65%                                                    |
| Reference                Contract No. |   | 81101200600001989                                        |   | Reference                Guaranty Contract No.     |   | 81901200600001462;                81902200600005528 |
| Stamp                of Applicant     |   |                                                     |   | Stamp                of Agricultural Bank of China |   |                                                |

----
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 259 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2007 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of 

Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment 

of the Senate. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Thursday, November 15, 2007, or Friday, No4 vember 16, 2007, on a motion offered pursuant to this 

5 concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his des6 ignee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, Decem7 ber 4, 2007, or until the time of any reassembly 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
2 

HCON 259 RDS 

1 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which2 ever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or 

3 adjourns on any day from Thursday, November 15, 2007, 

4 through Thursday, November 29, 2007, on a motion of5 fered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Major6 ity Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned 

7 until noon on Monday, December 3, 2007, or such other 

8 time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Lead9 er or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 

10 until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of 

11 this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 

12 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority 

13 Leader of the Senate, or their respective designees, acting 

14 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

15 House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify 

16 the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, 

17 to reassemble at such place and time as they may des18 ignate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant 

19 it. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 

2007. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DSCC hosts annual Powder Blast 5K

By Craig M. RaderDLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Department of Defense service members, civilians and contractors marked the end of summer in colorful fashion at the annual Powder Blast 5K at Defense Supply Center Columbus.

Runners sprinted through colorful plumes of non-toxic dust during the course before finishing in a final cloud of multi-hued powder. 

The installation’s Morale, Welfare and Recreation office organized the Sept. 14 event and distributed powder for spectators along the route to throw at the runners.

For information on upcoming runs, visit DSCC MWR's 5K page.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MMWR L&MPowder Blast5kCulture L&MHealth and Wellness L&M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                        ------------------------------


1.   Akra Travel, Inc., a Florida corporation
2.   AQUA Software Products, Inc., a California corporation
3.   Arrington Travel Center, Inc., an Illinois Corporation
4.   Associated Travel Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
5.   Associated Travel Services of Texas, Inc., a California corporation
6.   Associated Travel Services of Texas, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership
7.   Atlas Travel Service Ltd., a British Columbia corporation
8.   Atlas Travel Services, L.P., a Texas limited partnership
9.   Atlas Travel GP, Inc., a Texas corporation
10.  Atlas Travel Services Corp., a Delaware corporation
11.  Atlas Travel, L.C., a Texas limited liability company
12.  Chartrek International, Inc., a Connecticut corporation
13.  Bowers Worldwide Travel Service, Incorporated, an Arizona corporation
14.  Cornerstone Enterprises, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation
15.  Couch/Mollica Travel, Ltd., a Pennsylvania corporation
16.  Dollinger Travel, Inc., a New York corporation
17.  Envision Vacations, Inc., a Michigan corporation
18.  Evans Travel Group, Inc., a Louisiana corporation
19.  Evans Vacations, Inc., a Delaware corporation
20.  First Travelcorp, Inc., a North Carolina corporation
21.  Forbes Travel Service, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
22.  International Travel Resources, Inc., a Georgia corporation
23.  Jarvis Travel Ltd., an Alberta corporation
24.  Jekela Investments Ltd., a British Columbia corporation
25.  Lovejoy-Tiffany & Associates, Inc., a Michigan corporation
26.  McGregor Travel Management Canada Limited, an Ontario corporation
27.  McGregor Travel Management (UK) Limited, incorporated in England and Wales
28.  McGregor Travel Management, Inc., a Connecticut corporation
29.  M. D. Travel Management Limited, incorporated in England and Wales
30.  MSW Group Limited, incorporated in England and Wales
31.  MSW Premier Limited, incorporated in England and Wales
32.  MSW Travel Limited, incorporated in England and Wales
33.  MTA, Inc., a Washington corporation
34.  Moran Travel Bureau, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation
35.  Mutual Travel, Inc., a Washington corporation
36.  Navigant Cruise Center, Inc., a Delaware corporation
37.  Navigant International UK Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
38.  Navigant UK Limited, incorporated in England and Wales
39.  NavigantVacations.com Holdings, inc., a Delaware corporation
40.  NavigantVacations.com, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
41.  Oaks Travel Corp., a Texas corporation
42.  Omni Travel Service, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation
43.  Professional Travel Corporation, a Colorado corporation
44.  Simmons Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation
45.  Travel Acquisition Company, a Delaware corporation
46.  Travel Consultants, Inc., a Michigan corporation
47.  TravelCorp, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
48.  World Express Travel, Inc., an Alaska corporation
49.  1255994 Ontario Limited, an Ontario corporation
50.  1377665 Ontario Inc., an Ontario corporation
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sajan, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy Clayton, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
      and





2.
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Timothy ClaytonTimothy
      Clayton,
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      13,
      2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1630

JONATHAN IDEMA,

Appellant,

and

PATRICIA DAWN GLOSSON,

Plaintiff,

versus

EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Equifax, a/k/a Equifax Options,

a/k/a Equifax Credit Info Services,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-104-5-BR)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: July 31, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Jonathan Idema, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edmond Weddington, SMITH,

ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order imposing sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Idema v. Equifax

Credit Info. Serv., No. CA-95-104-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 1997). We

deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We further

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<SEQUENCE>2
<FILENAME>mcert311-033104.txt                Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Carl E. Midkiff, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Uptowner
Inns, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report.

         4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiary is
made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior
to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





- 1 -
<PAGE>
         5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors:

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses
in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and


6.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



	/s/ Carl E. Midkiff
	Chief Executive Officer
	May 13, 2004



















- 2 -
<PAGE>
No. 48811.

#### Protests 81108-K, etc., of R. Rudinger & Co. et al. (Honolulu, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 6418.

#### ZIMMERN BROTHERS vs. ROSENBURG-OLDSTEIN COMPANY, ET ALS.

Syllabus.

The dilatory exception of prematurity pleaded for the first time in an answer filed after a judgment by default comes -too late.

Appeal from the Civil District ’Court, Parish of Orleans, Division “B,” No. 111,604. Honorable G- H. Theard, Judge.

B. Y. Wolf, for plaintiff and appellee.

E. M. Cahn, for defendant and appellant.

J. H. Brewer, attorney.

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

The sole defense is that the plaintiff’s claim was not due at the date of the institution of the suit. This defense, in reality a plea of prematurity, the trial Court, in accord with the firmly established jurisprudence, properly declined to consider, since it was pleaded for the first time in the answer filed after a judgment by default.

C. P., 333.

Pecquet vs. Pecquet’s Executors, 17 An., 232, and authorities cited.

Mortee vs. Edwards, 20 A., 236.

Levert vs. Berthelot, 127 La., 1015.

Moreover, in this Court the defendants have not sought to justify or maintain their appeal by brief or by argument, and it is clear that the appeal is frivolous and *388is taken solely for the purpose of delay. Damages will therefore be .awarded in accordance with appellee’s demand in this Court.

Opinion and decree, June 30, 1915.

Rehearing refused, July 22, 1915.

C. P., 907.

It is accordingly ordered that the judgment be amended by adding 10% on the amount thereof as damages for á frivolous appeal and that as thus amended it be affirmed at the cost of appellants.

Amended and affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26542-26543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9323]
RIN 1545-BF64


Revisions to Regulations Relating to Repeal of Tax on Interest of 
Nonresident Alien Individuals and Foreign Corporations Received From 
Certain Portfolio Debt Investments; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to final regulations (TD 
9323) that were published in the Federal Register on Thursday, April 
12, 2007 (72 FR 18386) relating to the exclusion from gross income of 
portfolio interest paid to a nonresident alien individual or foreign 
corporation.

DATES: The correction is effective May 10, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Holman of the Office of the 
Associate Chief Counsel (International), (202) 622-3840 (not a toll-
free call).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of this correction are 
under sections 871 and 881 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, final regulations (TD 9323) contain an error that may 
prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

[[Page 26543]]

Correction of Publication

0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

0
Par. 2. Section 1.871-14 is amended by revising the second sentence of 
paragraph (g)(3)(ii) to read as follows:


Sec.  1.871-14  Rules relating to repeal of tax on interest of 
nonresident alien individuals and foreign corporations received from 
certain portfolio debt investments.

* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (ii) * * * For example, in the case of U.S. source interest paid by 
a domestic corporation to a domestic partnership or withholding foreign 
partnership (as defined in Sec.  1.1441-5(c)(2)), the 10-percent 
shareholder test is applied when any distributions that include the 
interest are made to a foreign partner and, to the extent that a 
foreign partner's distributive share of the interest has not actually 
been distributed, on the earlier of the date that the statement 
required under section 6031(b) is mailed or otherwise provided to such 
partner, or the due date for furnishing such statement. * * *
* * * * *

LaNita Van Dyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. E7-8922 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
May 25, 1970

No. 70-30

#### Scott Clifford McNeil, PVT, U. S. Marine Corps v United States.

On consideration of the Petition for extraordinary Relief, the Government Response to Order to Show Cause and of the Petitioner’s Reply to Government’s Response to Order to Show Cause, it appearing that subsequent to the issuance of said Order to Show Cause the Convening Authority completed his action upon the record of the petitioner’s trial and has forwarded said record for review by the United States Navy Court of Military Review, where it was filed May 19, 1970, it is, by the Court, this 25th day of May 1970,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot.-

This action is taken without prejudice to the right of petitioner to raise the issue of appellate delay, or to raise any other issue, during the course of appellate review, below, and on appeal to this Court should such appeal be deemed necessary or advisable.