alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 13,385.

#### STETTINIUS v. MYER.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 349.] 3

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1833.

Assumpsit — Trial—Indorsements—Set-Off.

1. The plaintiff may, at the trial, after the jury is sworn, strike out the second and third blank indorsements of the note, and fill up the first blank indorsement to himself.

2. In an action for goods sold at auction, for cash, the defendant may set off the plaintiff's note.

Assumpsit [by Samuel Stettinius against B. P. Myer’s administrator] for goods sold at auction. Terms cash. The defendant pleaded in offset a promissory note of the plaintiff to Davidson, and indorsed by him and two others, all in blank.

Mr. Morfit, for plaintiff,

objected that the defendant’s title to the note was not complete, and cited Day v. Lyon, 6 Har. & J. 140.

Mr. Marbury, for defendant,

contended that he had now a right, after the jury was sworn, to strike out the blank indorsements of the subsequent indorsers and their names, and to fill up the blank indorsement of Davidson, the first indorser, so as to make the note payable to Myer. And of that opinion was the whole court.

Mr. Morfit then contended that, as the sale of the goods by the plaintiff to Myer was at auction, and the terms of sale cash, the defendant could not set off the note of the plaintiff. And of that opinion was THRUSTON, Circuit Judge.

But

THE COURT

(THRUSTON. Circuit Judge, contra]

overruled the objection. THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, afterwards agreed with the court, upon seeing the case of Eland v. Karr, 1 East, 375.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHBIT 23.1





                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
Hastings Entertainment, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-60997 and 333-61007) on Form S-8 of Hastings Entertainment, Inc. of our
report dated March 16, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Hastings Entertainment, Inc. as of January 31, 1998, and 1999, and the related
statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended January 31, 1999, and the related schedule, which
report appears in the January 31, 1999, Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hastings
Entertainment, Inc. Our report refers to a change in the method of amortization
for rental videos.

                                       /s/ KPMG LLP



Dallas, Texas
April 30, 1999
33941.

#### BANKS v. THE STATE.

Nichols, Chief Justice.

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals. This court affirms.

1. Appellant presents the general grounds in his first enumeration of error. An eyewitness, the wife of the victim, testified that appellant shot the victim without justification at close range. A medical doctor testified that the victim died of complications caused by a gunshot wound. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict. *Johnson v. State,*239 Ga. 116 (236 SE2d 65) (1977).

Appellant also argues in support of his enumeration of error relating to the general grounds that the trial court erred in not charging the jury on a felony murder and on voluntary manslaughter. Pretermitting questions of procedure, there is no merit in these asserted grounds. Appellant was indicted for malice murder, and the court charged on malice murder. Appellant has shown no harm in the failure of the court to charge felony murder. The only possible effect of charging felony murder would be to broaden the circumstances under which appellant could have been found guilty of murder. The giving of a charge on felony murder would have been to appellant’s detriment, not for his benefit. This court consistently has held that both error and harm must be shown to constitute reversible error. *Glass v. State,*235 Ga. 17 (218 SE2d 776) (1975). The failure of the trial court to charge voluntary manslaughter in the absence of a written request to charge was not error. *State v. Stonaker,*236 Ga. 1, 2 (222 SE2d 354) (1976); *Birt v. State,*238 Ga. 402 (233 SE2d 362) (1977); *Mitchell v. State,*238 Ga. 420 (233 SE2d 173) (1977). The first enumeration of error is without merit.

2. Appellant contends that he was deprived of equal protection of the law under the Constitutions of Georgia and the United States in that the state used its peremptory challenges to strike black persons from the *632panel in selecting the trial jury. There is no merit in this enumeration of error. *Jordan v. State,*235 Ga. 732 (222 SE2d 23) (1975).

Argued September 13, 1978

Decided November 30, 1978.

*Allison*W. *Davidson,*for appellant.

*William Smith, District Attorney, Richard C. Hagler, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# DPMAP/Social Contract Information Sessions

By Dana CochraneDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
In an attempt to assist the workforce with the DPMAP Closeout of Cycle 1 and Planning of Cycle 2, People and Culture held DPMAP/Social Contract Information sessions. 

With the assistance of J1, these sessions took place between March 13 and April 2.  Six sessions were held for supervisors and managers which included 188 supervisors (including J6 and Installation Support) and four sessions for employees which included 383 associates (including Live Stream).

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCommunity L&MProcess Management L&MResource the Enterprise L&MTraining L&M
No. 65793.

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 279483-K/7894 and 288593-K/7908 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 47652.

#### Protests 821089-G, etc., of John Alban & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-70870, 333-47288, 333-108573, 333-111878, 333-111880 and
333-118234) and on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-89369, 333-37400, 333-40430, 333-42974,
333-43996, 333-111543, 333-117068, 333-127989, 333-137314, 333-141245 and
333-153766) of Internap Network Services Corporation of our report dated March
12, 2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.




/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Atlanta,
Georgia


March 12,
2009
No. 62118.

#### John Edgar Staren *v.*United States,

protest 227024-K (Nogales).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 43170.

#### Protests 8339-K, etc., of W. E. Sellers (New York).

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

From the evidence it was found that the steel plates in question are polished on one side. The claim at 1% cents per pound under paragraph 309 was therefore sustained.
No. 96-853.

#### Mustang Fuel Corp. et al. *v.*Hatch et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: August 31, 2017 1
Refiled in Redacted Form: February 7, 2018

* * * * * * * * * * * * * PUBLISHED C.B. and C.B., as Best Friends of Their * Son, M.B., a Minor, * Chief Special Master Dorsey

*

* No. 05-1168V Petitioners, * * Denial of Entitlement; Measles, Mumps

v. * & Rubella (“MMR”) Vaccine; Hepatitis

* A (“Hep A”) Vaccine; Varicella

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Vaccine; Autistic Disorder (“AD”);
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Residual Human DNA Fragments;

* HERV-K Fragments; Insertional Respondent. * Mutagenesis; Autoimmunity.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * John F. McHugh, Law Office of John McHugh, New York, NY, for petitioners. Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION DISMISSING PETITION

On April 24, 2014, petitioners filed a memorandum in which they agreed to be bound by the ruling in the J.M. et al. (02-10V) case.

On August 31, 2017, I ruled against petitioners in J.M. et al. A copy of that decision is attached hereto as Appendix A and is incorporated herein.

Accordingly, petitioners are bound by that decision, and this case is DISMISSED

. In the absence of a motion for review, 2 the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in

accordance with this decision.

1 When this decision was originally filed, I advised the parties of my intent to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E -Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. §3501 note (2012) (Federal management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners filed a motion to redact certain information. This decision is being reissued with minimal changes, including redaction of the peti tioners’ name in the case caption to initials and redaction of the lead omnibus case name to initials. Except for those changes and this footnote, no other substantive changes

have been made.

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
No. 48167.

#### Protests 477752-G, etc., of Favorite Panama Hat Co. (New York).

*431Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel harvest hats similar in all material respects to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) were held dutiable at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) as claimed.
EXHIBIT 23


<PAGE>






                              Accountants' Consent



Board of Directors
First Kansas Financial Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-81667 and No.  333-81699) on Form S-8 of First Kansas Financial  Corporation
and subsidiary of our report dated January 19, 2001 relating to the consolidated
balance  sheets of First  Kansas  Financial  Corporation  and  subsidiary  as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related consolidated  statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years then
ended, which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2000 annual
report on Form 10-KSB of First Kansas Financial Corporation and subsidiary.



                                             /s/KPMG LLP



March 15, 2001
Kansas City, Missouri
No. 54931.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 142001-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131675 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan WALLACE CARROLL JUSTICE, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131675 COA: 266924 Ct of Claims: 05-000117-MZ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellant,

and

DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

l1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, E.J. Holm, the principal executive officer of the Company, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Iroquois Gas
Transmission System, L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

DATE: November 12, 2004


/S/ E.J. HOLM
____________________
E.J. HOLM
PRESIDENT
**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (3) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 18, 2007 | By:*/s/*Roger                DavisRoger                Davis |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Chief                  Financial Officer                     |
|                              |                                                         |
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jarrod A. WILSON.

No. 98-KO-1135.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1999.

IN RE: Wilson, Jarrod A.; — Defendants); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Jefferson Davis 32nd Judicial District Court Div. “E” Number CR-1883-96, CR-330-97

Denied on showing made.

KNOLL, J. not on panel.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Aviation at Warner Robins employees capture bowling trophy

By Mark Eblen, DLA Aviation at Warner Robins

                Richmond, Va  –              
Amongst strong competition June 29, Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Warner Robins, Georgia, employees defeat teams from across the base by over 40 pins during the inaugural Team Robins Commanders Cup Bowling Tournament.  

The winning team is looking forward to defending its title next year.  Pictured, from left, are Richard Stewart, lead, inventory/stock readiness; Jerry Ruiz, chief, Material Management Division; Mark Eblen, order management business process analyst and team captain; Frank Klima,levels monitor and John Wallace, building manager, Equipment and Facilities Management Division.    

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

People and Culturebowlingteambuilding
No. 40453.

#### Protests 732054-G, etc., of Steel Union, Inc., et al. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

On the authority of Abstracts 35479 and 37251 involving- similar merchandise the articles in question were found to be structural shapes within the meaning of paragraph 312 and held dutiable at one-fifth of 1 cent per pound as claimed. *Judson Forwarding Co.*v. *United States*(20 C. C. P. A. 229, T. D. 46038) and *Amerlux*v. *United States*(id. 238, T. D. 46039) followed.