alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 8, 2007 /s/ Donald R. Mayer Donald R. Mayer, Principal Executive Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# January New Employee Orientation

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The DLA Land and Maritime New Employee Orientation will be held Jan. 24 in Building 20, Buckeye Room, from 8:45 a.m. - 3 p.m. and continue Jan. 25 from 9 a.m. - 2 p.m.   

Starting a new job can be confusing and stressful. During orientation, there'll be presentations from various organizations that will provide guidance and support to help you become acclimated to your new organization and embrace your new career. 

New associates from all local DLA hosted tenants, military,and interns are welcome to attend. The training is mandatory and held the last Wednesday and Thursday of every month. Attendance is tracked and reported. 

If you have any questions, please contact Dawn Sutton  at (614) 692-6824.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Culture L&MTraining L&MDLA L&MNew Employee
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1693-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Maine (FEMA-1693-DR), dated April 25, 2007, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 9, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Maine is hereby amended to include the Individual Assistance program for the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 25, 2007: 

Cumberland and York Counties for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds:  97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 

 [FR Doc. E7-9502 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
No. 46945.

#### Protest 32041-K/12133 of Pan American Products Corp. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

At the hearing counsel for the Government moved for dismissal of the protest as not filed in time. Inasmuch as the present claim is a new one and was filed more than 60 days after the original liquidation the motion to dismiss was granted. *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 157, C. A. D. 10) and *Dover*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 306) noted.
<PAGE>
SUBSIDIARIES OF LIBERTY GROUP PUBLISHING, INC. - EXHIBIT 21


Name                                                          Jurisdiction
------------------------------------------------------        ------------
Liberty Group Operating, Inc.                                 Delaware
Liberty Group Arizona Holdings, Inc.                          Delaware
Liberty Group Arkansas Holdings, Inc.                         Delaware
Liberty Group California Holdings, Inc.                       Delaware
Liberty Group Idaho Holdings, Inc.                            Delaware
Liberty Group Illinois Holdings, Inc.                         Delaware
Liberty Group Iowa Holdings, Inc.                             Delaware
Liberty Group Kansas Holdings, Inc.                           Delaware
Liberty Group Louisiana Holdings, Inc.                        Delaware
Liberty Group Michigan Holdings, Inc.                         Delaware
Liberty Group Minnesota Holdings, Inc.                        Delaware
Liberty Group Missouri Holdings, Inc.                         Delaware
Liberty Group Nebraska Holdings, Inc.                         Delaware
Liberty Group Nevada Holdings, Inc.                           Delaware
Liberty Group New York Holdings, Inc.                         Delaware
Liberty Group North Dakota Holdings, Inc.                     Delaware
Liberty Group Pennsylvania Holdings, Inc.                     Delaware
Liberty Group Management Services, Inc.                       Delaware
Liberty Group Suburban Newspapers, Inc.                       Delaware
Liberty Group Southern Michigan Holdings, Inc.                Delaware
Liberty SMC, L.L.C.                                           Delaware
News Leader, Inc.                                             Louisiana
Mineral Daily News Tribune Inc.                               West Virginia
Elko Daily Free Press                                         Nevada
Terry Newspapers, Inc.                                        Iowa
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,613-01

EX PARTE JESUS RODRIGUEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-14-200034-A IN THE 450TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison. The Thirteenth Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction. Rodriguez v. State, No. 13-16-00396-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus

Christi del. May 17, 2018). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus and an

amended habeas application in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded the

pleadings to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant raises manyclaims, including claims of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate

counsel. There is no response from counsel in the record provided to this Court, and there are no

findings from the trial court. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. 

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The
2

trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

The trial court shall order trial and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective

assistance by explaining counsels’ representation of Applicant, including applicable strategy and

tactical decisions. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article

11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is

indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint

counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is

appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claims

Applicant has raised. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 15, 2020

Do not publish
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 00-7080



# 
L ARRY L EVEL M C C ONNEYHEAD ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-215, CA-00-249-3-1-MU) Submitted: December 20, 2000 Decided: January 24, 2001 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELLarry Level McConneyhead, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Larry Level McConneyhead seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). McConneyhead asserted claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and sentencing guidelines calculations in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion that he fails to raise on appeal to this court. Under Fourth Circuit Local Rule 34(b), McConneyhead has waived his right to appellate review of these claims. In his informal appellate brief, McConneyhead asserts for the first time that his sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey , ___ U.S. ___, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). Assuming without deciding that this claim is properly before us, it is without merit. Apprendi requires that, "[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penaltyfor a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt." Id. at 2362. McConneyhead’s sentence was less than the statutory maximum he faced. Second, McConneyhead asserts he has been unconstitutionallydeprived of access to the courts based on the inadequacy of his prison’s law library. This claim is not properly before us; rather it must be pursued in a civil rights action that challenges McConneyhead’s conditions of confinement. We express no opinion as to the merit of this claim. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED 2 U NITED S TATES v. M C C ONNEYHEAD
No. 96-978.

#### Wilson *v.*Drake et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
No. 74-5899.

#### Hunter *v.*Swenson, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 48793.

#### Protests 96081-K, etc., of Meadows Wye & Co., Inc., et al.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

NICHOLAS FERA, JR.,

 Petitioner

 v.

BALDWIN BOROUGH, A

MUNICIPALITY, JOHN CONLEY,

MEMBER OF COUNCIL, DAVID

DEPRETIS, MEMBER OF COUNCIL,

MICHAEL DUCKER, MEMBER OF

COUNCIL, MICHAEL E. FETSKO, JR.,

MEMBER OF COUNCIL, JOHN FERRIS,

JR., MEMBER OF COUNCIL, FRANCIS

SCOTT, MEMBER OF COUNCIL,

BALDWIN POLICE DEPARTMENT,

CHRISTOPHER T. KELLY, AN

INDIVIDUAL AND IN HIS OFFICIAL

CAPACITY OF CHIEF OF POLICE,

RESPODENTS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 103 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

The Petitioner's Application for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel is DENIED AS

MOOT.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40416 Summary Calendar

JOHN EDWARD EASTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BRANDEE FERGUSON, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CV-712

- - - - - - - - - - October 31, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John Edward Easter, Texas prisoner # 622867, proceeding pro

se and in forma pauperis (IFP), appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Easter contends that he was deprived of his constitutional rights because he was prohibited from receiving publications that contained sexually explicit photographs.No. 96-40416 - 2 - After conducting a de novo review and applying the same standard as a district court, Brewer v. Wilkinson , 3 F.2d 816, 819-20 (5th Cir. 1993), we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. The limitation placed on Easter’s First Amendment rights due to the censorship of the materials he requested did not amount to a constitutional violation. See Guajardo v. Estelle , 580 F.2d 760, 761-62 (5th Cir. 1978); see Thompson v. Patteson , 985 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1993). Easter did not demonstrate a violation of equal protection. Thompson , 985 F.2d at 207. Texas provides an adequate postdeprivation remedy for property-loss claims. Murphy v. Collins , 26 F.3d 541, 543-44 (5th Cir. 1994). Easter’s blackmail and conspiracy claims are abandoned. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993)(issues must be briefed to be preserved on appeal). Any claims relating to September publications are also abandoned pursuant to Easter’s request. Easter’s motion for a trial is DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 24, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60514 Summary Calendar

MINERVA DELGADO-CASTANEDA, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A78 942 304

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Minerva Delgado-Castaneda petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA’s) denial of cancellation of removal. Delgado-Castaneda argues that the BIA erred when it determined that her 1993 voluntary departure from this country following a visit to Mexico interrupted her ten years continuous physical presence in the United States. The Respondent has filed a motion for a summary disposition. This court has jurisdiction to review the BIA’s order. See Mireles-Valdez v. Ashcroft , 349 F.3d 213, 217 (5th Cir. 2003).No. 04-60514 -2- To be eligible for a discretionary cancellation of removal, an alien must satisfy four requirements, one of which is 10 years of continuous physical presence in the United States. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Mireles-Valdez , 349 F.3d at 214-15. Delgado’s voluntary departure from the United States at the border in 1993 interrupted her continuous presence. See Mireles-Valdez , 349 F.3d at 217-19. The Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the petition for review is DENIED.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1284 

To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to consider reconstruction and improvement of flood protection systems when establishing 

flood insurance rates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2011 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to 

require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency to consider reconstruction and improvement of flood protection systems when establishing 

flood insurance rates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1284 IS

1 SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF RECONSTRUCTION AND 

2 IMPROVEMENT OF FLOOD PROTECTION SYS3 TEMS IN DETERMINATION OF FLOOD INSUR4 ANCE RATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1307 of the National 

6 Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4014) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in subsection (e)— 

9 (A) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘con10 struction of a flood protection system’’ and in11 serting ‘‘construction, reconstruction, or im12 provement of a flood protection system (without 

13 respect to the level of Federal investment or 

14 participation)’’; and 

15 (B) in the second sentence— 

16 (i) by striking ‘‘construction of a flood 

17 protection system’’ and inserting ‘‘con18 struction, reconstruction, or improvement 

19 of a flood protection system’’; and 

20 (ii) by inserting ‘‘based on the present 

21 value of the completed system’’ after ‘‘has 

22 been expended’’; and 

23 (2) in subsection (f)— 

24 (A) in the first sentence in the matter pre25 ceding paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘(without reVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:05 Jun 29, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1284.IS S1284

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1284 IS

1 spect to the level of Federal investment or par2 ticipation)’’ after ‘‘no longer does’’; 

3 (B) in the third sentence in the matter 

4 preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, wheth5 er coastal or riverine,’’ after ‘‘special flood haz6 ard’’; and 

7 (C) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘a Fed8 eral agency in consultation with the local 

9 project sponsor’’ and inserting ‘‘the entity or 

10 entities that own, operate, maintain, or repair 

11 such system’’. 

12 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 30 days after the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of 

14 the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall promul15 gate regulations to carry out the amendments made by 

16 subsection (a). 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS