alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00662

- CR Alberto Aguirre RENDON , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. CR13

- 1227 Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 20, 2016
DIS MISSED In this appeal, i nitially, Appellant Alberto Aguirre Rendon had court

- appointed counsel. Later, after the trial court determined App ellant was not indigent, the trial court discharged appointed counsel. Appointed counsel advised Appellant that his brief was due on February 22,
2016. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 6.5(c)

. After the deadline to file the brief passed and Appellant did not file a motion for extension of time or a brief, on February 29, 2016, we ordered Appellant to file either his brief or a motion to dismiss this appeal not later than March 10, 2016. We advised04

- 15

- 00662

- CR

- 2

- Appellant that if no brief or motion was filed by that date, we would abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b)(2). On March 14, 2016, after Appellant had not filed a response to our February 29, 2016 order , we abated this appeal and remanded the cau se to the trial court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State , 952 S.W.2d 50, 52

– 53 (Tex. A pp.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.). We ordered
t he trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the following questions: (1) Does Appellant desire to prosecute his appeal? (2) Is Appellant now indigent? If Appellant ’s circumstances have changed such that Appellant is now indigent, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may incl ude the appointment of counsel. If Appellant is not indigent, the trial court need not appoint counsel for appeal. (3) Has Appellant abandoned the appeal? On March 23, 2016, as ordered, the trial court held an abandonment hearing

. After Appellant was sworn, t he trial court read this court’s February 29, 2016 order in its entirety to Appellant. Appellant asked the court to determine whether he was indigent for purposes of appeal , and the trial court again found he was not. The trial court asked Appell ant if he wished to prosecute his appeal; Appellant answered no. The trial court asked Appellant if he was abandoning his appeal ; Appellant answered yes. The trial court found that Appellant did not desire to prosecute his appeal, and Appellant has aband oned this appeal. We reinstate th e appeal on th is court’s docket

. We construe Appellant’s sworn statement in open court that he does not desire to prosecute this appeal as an oral motion to dismiss this appeal . Appellant’s motion is granted; this appea l is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Unassociated Document


    


    
      	
              TO:

            	
              The
                Purchasers of Innovative Card Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation
                (the “Company”),
                8% Senior Secured Convertible Debentures and Warrants pursuant to
                that
                certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of January __, 2008
                (the
                “Purchase Agreement”),
                the Company and the purchasers signatory
                thereto

            


    

    


    To
      Whom
      It May Concern:

    


    Defined
      terms not otherwise defined in this letter agreement shall have the meanings
      set
      forth in the Purchase Agreement. This agreement is given in consideration of,
      and as a condition to enter into such Purchase Agreement and is not revocable
      by
      me. This letter agreement will confirm my agreement to vote all shares of
      Innovative Card Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“INVC”)
      voting
      stock over which I have voting control in favor of any resolution presented
      to
      the shareholders of INVC to approve a transaction or series of transactions
      which could result in an aggregate issuance of the Company’s common stock in
      excess of 19.99% as required by the rules of the NASDAQ. 

     

    


    


    
      	 	
              By:

            	
              _______________________________________

            
	 	
               

            	
              Name
                of Shareholder:

            
	 	
               

            	
              Shares
                Beneficial Ownership:
No. 48777.

#### Protests 777702-G, etc., of Gaetano Sabelli (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and the cited cases the following allowances were made by the court to compensate for foreign substances on the outside of certain cheese: (1) 2)4 percent for cheese similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146, and (2) 1 percent for other cheese similar to Reggiano cheese the subject of said C. D. 706. Protests sustained to this extent.
**Exhibit 13.1**

----

**CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEYACT OF 2002**

I, Thomas Henry Glocer, CEO of Reuters Group PLC (the “Company”) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:a)    The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 20-F”)    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; andb) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

| By                   |                 |
|----------------------|----------------------|
|                 |                 |
| /s/ Thomas H. Glocer |                 |
|                 |                 |
| Thomas H. Glocer     |                 |
| CEO                  | Dated: 16 March 2007 |

 

----
No. 48115.

#### Protests 92494-K, etc., of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel marcel irons used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339, as claimed, following Abstract 38680. It was also stipulated that the electric Christmas wreaths in question are similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Minami*(29 C. C. P. A. 169, C. A. D. 188). In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 35 percent ad valorem under paragraph 353, as claimed.
No. 74-5924.

#### Baxter *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 48835.

#### Protests 60545-K, etc., of Hochschild, Kohn & Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Global Realty  Development Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Roger Davis,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  November 14, 2006                 By: /s/ Roger Davis
                                         -------------------
                                         Roger Davis
                                         Chief Financial Officer
No. 96-7867.

#### Mason *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit No. 32.2
Form 10-QSB
The Quantum Group, Inc.
File No. 000-31727



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.


IN CONNECTION WITH THE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE QUANTUM GROUP, INC. (THE
"COMPANY") ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JULY 31, 2005 AS FILED WITH THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON THE DATE HEREOF (THE "REPORT"), I, NOEL J.
GUILLAMA, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY, CERTIFY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002, THAT: (1) THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13(A)
OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934; AND (2) THE INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS, THE FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY.


                                                    By;  /s/ Noel J. Guillama
Date:  September 16, 2005                                -----------------------
                                                         Noel J. Guillama
                                                         Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The Quantum Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Quantum Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2013101EN.01001801.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2013 — AMC-Representações Têxteis v OHIM — MIP Metro (METRO KIDS COMPANY)

(Case T-50/12) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark METRO KIDS COMPANY - Earlier international figurative mark METRO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 101/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AMC-Representações Têxteis Lda (Taveiro, Portugal) (represented by: V. Caires Soares, lawyer)

Applicant:

da

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 November 2011 (Case R 2314/2010-1), concerning opposition proceedings between MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG and AMC-Representações Têxteis Lda.

da

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders AMC-Representações Têxteis Lda to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders AMC-Representações Têxteis Lda to pay the costs.

da

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caneum, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Suki Mudan, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.


/s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan
Sukhbir Singh Mudan, President
and Principal Financial Officer

Date:  August 14, 2003
# C_2012399EN.01001301.xml

| 22.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 10 October 2012 — Karin Oertel v Finanzamt Würzburg mit Außenstelle Ochsenfurt

(Case C-455/12)

2012/C 399/22

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Karin Oertel

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Würzburg mit Außenstelle Ochsenfurt

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Having regard to the principle of neutrality, does the third subparagraph of Article 12(3)(a) in conjunction with Annex H, Category 5, of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 (1) on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes preclude national rules which provide for a reduced rate of turnover tax for local passenger transport by taxi, whereas local passenger transport by minicab is subject to the standard rate of tax?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment; OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION









<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Infinity  Capital Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Theodore
A. Greenberg,  Principal  Accounting  Officer,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief
Investment  Officer and  Secretary of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 12, 2010


/s/Theodore A. Greenberg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Position: Principal Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Investment Officer and Secretary


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# PHANTOM 3

V1.2

2015.06 

# User Manual

PROFESSIONAL© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

### 53Appendix 

# Appendix Specifcations

Aircraft Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) 1280 g Max. Ascent Speed 5 m/s Max. Descent Speed 3 m/s Max. Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) Max. Flight Altitude 6000 m Max. Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS Gimbal Controllable Range Pitch: - 90° to + 30° Vision Positioning Velocity Range < 8 m/s (2 m above ground) Altitude Range 30 cm-300 cm Operating Range 30 cm-300 cm Operating Environment Brightly lit (lux > 15) patterned surfaces Camera Sensor Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels:12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M) Lens FOV 94° 20mm(35mm format equivalent ) f/2.8 ISO Range 100-3200(video) 100-1600(photo) Electronic Shutter Speed 8s -1/8000s Image Max. Size 4000 x 3000

Still Photography Modes Single shot Burst shooting: 3/5/7 frames Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5 Bracketed frames at 0.7EV Bias Time-lapse Supported SD Card Types Micro SD Max. capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required

Video Recording Modes UHD : 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p24/25/30 FHD:1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60 HD:1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60 Max. Bitrate Of Video Storage 60 Mbps

Supported File Formats FAT32/exFAT Photo: JPEG, DNG Video: MP4/MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264) Operating Temperature Range 0°C to 40°C

### 54 © 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved.Appendix 

### Phantom 3 Professional User Manual

Remote Controller Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz Transmitting Distance 2000 m (Outdoor And Unobstructed) Video Output Port USB Operating Temperature Range 0°C- 40°C Battery 6000 mAh LiPo 2S Mobile Device Holder Tablets and smartphones Transmitter Power(EIRP) FCC: 20 dbm; CE:16 dbm Working Voltage 1.2 A @7.4 V Charger Voltage 17.4 V Rated Power 100 W Intelligent Flight Battery ( PH3-4480 mAh-15.2 V ) Capacity 4480 mAh Voltage 15.2 V Battery Type LiPo 4S Energy 68 Wh Net Weight 365 g Operating Temperature -10°C- 40°C Max. Charging Power 100 W


### Aircraft Status Indicator Description

Normal Red, Green and Yellow Flash Alternatively Turning on and Self-Diagnostics Green and Yellow Flash Alternatively Aircraft Warming Up Green Flashes Slowly Safe to Fly (P-mode with GPS and Vision Positioning)
X2 Green Flashes Twice Safe to Fly (P-mode with Vision Positioning but without GPS) Yellow Flashes Slowly Safe to Fly (A-mode but No GPS and Vision Posi

tioning) Warning Fast Yellow Flashing Remote Controller Signal Lost Slow Red Flashing Low Battery Warning Fast Red Flashing Critical Battery Warning Red Flashing Alternatively IMU Error

— Solid Red Critical Error Red and Yellow Flash Alternatively Compass Calibration Required
No. 43154.

#### Protests 896685-G, etc., of S. S. Pierce Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of baked articles similar to those the subject of *Renken*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 309, C. D. 73) and *Wile*v. *United States*(T. D. 49514). The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
# C_2014071EN.01003601.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/36

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 October 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-145/12)

(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the period for bringing proceedings, extended on account of distance by a period of ten days - Application received by post within the following ten days - Applications not the same - Action out of time)

(2014/C 71/71)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for the revalorisation of his invalidity pension.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio id ordered to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio id ordered to bear his own costs.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JAMES KELLY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 565 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
# C_2013252EN.01005202.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/52

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 24 June 2013 — Weissenfels v Parliament

(Case F-150/12) (1)

1

2013/C 252/97

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013, p. 36.

1

---
**VICTOR
INDUSTRIES, INC.**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
 
 In
connection with this annual report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB of Victor
Industries, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, I, Lana Pope,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Victor Industries, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  This
Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
information contained in this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Victor Industries, Inc. for the periods
presented therein.
 
 Date: October
21, 2005
 
 
 /s./
Lana Pope
 
 Lana
Pope
 Chief
Financial Officer
 (Principle
Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Technologies Group,
Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), the
undersigned, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: June 14, 2010

                                          /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Alex Stelmak
                                          Chief Executive Officer,
                                          Chairman of the Board and
                                          Chief Financial Officer