# Ony xEnvironmenta l Services Sauget , Illinois

Evaluationo

f Metals , Particulat

e Matter, Hydroge

n Chloride/ChlorineGa

s an d PCDD/PCD F Emission s fo r Incinerator

s 3 an d4 Augus t200 2 Tes tProgra m

ENS R Corporatio n Novembe r2002 Documen tNumbe r10002-004-40 0r 

### CONTENT S

1.0 INTRODUCTIO N 1- 1 1. 1 Progra m Summar y1- 1 1. 2 - Fiel d Progra m Schedul e 1- 1
2. 0 SUMMAR YO FRESULT S 2-1 2. 1 Introductio n 2- 1 2. 2 Stac k

Emissio n Result s fo rPCDDs/PCDF s 2- 1 2. 3 Stac k

Emissio n Result s fo rTarge tMetal s 2- 1 2. 4 Stac k

Emissio n Result s fo rParticulat e matter , HCI , an d Cl 22- 2
3. 0 SAMPLIN G AN D ANALYTICA L PROCEDURE S 3-1 3. 1 Samplin g Procedure s 3- 1 3.1. 1 Velocity , Moistur e an d Fixe d Ga s Determination s 3- 1 3.1. 2 PCDD/PCD FSamplin g : 3- 1 3.1. 3 Metal s Samplin g 3- 1 3.1. 4 PM/HCI/CI 2Samplin g Procedur e 3- 1 3. 2 Analytica l Procedure s 3- 2 3.2. 1 PCDD/PCD FAnalyse s 3- 2 3.2. 2 Metal s Analyse s 3- 2 3.2. 3 PM/HCI/C b Analysi s 3- 2
4. 0 QUALIT YASSURANC E 4-1 4. 1 Introductio n 4- 1 4. 2 Stac k

Samplin g QA/Q C 4- 1 4. 3 Chain-of-Custod y4- 2 4. 4 Analytica l QA/Q C 4- 2 4.4. 1 Analysi s fo rMetal s 4- 2 V4.4. 2 Analysi s fo rPCDDs/PCDF s 4- 3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony xj

_November , 200 2 Report2.do cCONTENT S -CONTINUE D 4.4. 3 Analysi s fo rParticulat e Matte r4- 3 4.4. 4 Analysi s fo rHCI/CI 24- 3 APPENDICE S

A-Fiel d Data Sheet s B -Proces s Fee d an d Operatin g Condition s C -Fiel d Equipmen tCalibratio n Form s D -Analytica l Data Report s

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\0nyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c i i November , 200 2

# Eltt R
INTERNATIONAL 

### LIS TO FTABLE S

Tabl e 2- 1 ONY XFixe d Heart h Incinerato rUni t3 Conditio n 1 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Result s - TE Q

Basi s 2- 3 Tabl e 2- 2 ONY XFixe d Heart h Incinerato rUni t3 Conditio n 1 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Result s -

Congene rClas s Total s 2- 4 Tabl e 2- 3 ONY XFixe d Heart h Incinerato rUni t3 Conditio n 2 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Result s - TE Q

Basi s 2- 5 Tabl e 2- 4 ONY XFixe d Heart h Incinerato rUni t3 Conditio n 2 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Result s -

Congene rClas s Total s 2- 6 Tabl e 2- 5 ONY XFixe d Heart h Incinerato rUni t4 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Result s - TE Q Basi s 2- 7 Tabl e 2- 6 Fixe d Heart h Incinerato rUni t4 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Result s - Congene rClas s Totals

. 2- 8 Tabl e 2- 7 Summar yo fHW C MAC TMetal s Emission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 1 2- 9 Tabl e 2- 8 Summar yo fHW C MAC TMetal s Emission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 2 2-1 0 Tabl e 2- 9 Summar yo fHW C MAC TMetal s Emission s fo rUnit4 2-1. 1 Tabl e 2-1 0 Summar yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 1 2-1 2 Tabl e 2-1 1 Summar yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 2 2-1 5 Tabl e 2-1 2 Summar yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUni t4 2-1 8 Tabl e 2-1 3 PM/HCI/CI 2 Emissio n Result s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 1 2-2 1 Tabl e 2-1 4 PM/HCI/CI 2 Emissio n Result s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 2...

. 2-2 2 Tabl e 2-1 5 PM/HCI/CI 2 Emissio n Result s fo rUnit4 2-2 3

J:\Air_ToxVProjec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x|| | November , 200 2 Report2.do c

### 1. 0 INTRODUCTIO N

1. 1 Progra m Summary ENS R Internationa l wa s retaine d b yOny xEnvironmenta l Services , Sauget , Illinoi s t o conduc t stac k ga s emissio n samplin g durin g th e wee k o fAugus t19 , 200 2 o n tw o incinerator s a tth e facility

. Uni t3 an d Uni t4 wer e bot h teste d fo rdioxin s an d furan s i n accordanc e wit h EP AMetho d 0023 , twelv e (12 ) metals 1 i n accordanc e wit h EP AMetho d 2 9 an d particulat e matte r(PM) , hydroge n chlorid e (HCI) , an d chlorin e (Cl 2 ) i n accordanc e t o EP AMetho d 0050

. Stac k flow s wer e determine d b ypito ttube/wate rmanomete ra s parto fth e actua l samplin g process . Stac k moistur e wa s determine d b ymeasurin g th e volum e gaine d i n th e samplin g trai n durin g sampling

. Oxyge n an d carbo n dioxid e wer e determine d b ycollectin g aTedia rba g sampl e followe d b yORSA T analysis

. Metho d 002 3 sample s wer e labeled , package d an d shippe d followin g accepte d protocol s t o Alt a Analytical , E l Dorad o Hills , C Afo rth e dioxi n an d fura n analysis

. Metho d 2 9 sample s wer e labeled , package d an d shippe d followin g accepte d protocol s t o PS C Analytica l Services , Burlington , Ontari o (Canada)

. Th e front-hal ffraction s fro m th e Metho d 005 0 samplin g trai n (front
hal frins e an d particulat e filter ) wer e labeled , package d an d shippe d followin g accepte d protocol s t o ENSR' s Ai rToxic s Laborator yi n Harvar d M Awher e the ywer e subjecte d t o gravimetri c analysis

. Back-hal ffraction s fro m thi s samplin g trai n wer e als o sen tto PS C Analytica l Services , Burlington , Ontari o fo rHC I an d Cl 2determination

. Th e HC I an d Cl 2analyse s wer e performe d i n accordanc e wit h EP AMetho d 905 7 (io n chromatography)

. I n additio n to progra m samples , ENS R prepare d tw o fiel d blank s fo ranalysis , on e fo reac h incinerato rstack

. 1. 2 Fiel d Progra m Schedul e Th e tes twa s complete d ove rafive-da ytim e fram e a s follows : Augus t19
—Trave l to th e sit e an d se tu p o n stac k o fUni t4 ; Augus t2 0 - Complete d Ru n 1 an d 2 o n Uni t4 ; Augus t2 1 - Complete d Ru n 3 o n Uni t4 , mov e an d set-u p equipmen to n Uni t3 ; Augus t2 2 - Complete d Ru n 1 , 2 , an d 3 o n Uni t3 ;

1 Thes e metal s included : antimony , arsenic , barium , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , lead , mercury , nickel , selenium , silve ran d thallium

.

J:\Air_Tox\Proje d Files\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 1- 1 November , 200 2INTeRNATIONAL

Augus t2 3 - Complete d Ru n 4 o n Uni t3 , prepare d sample s fo rshipment , departe d site

.

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workWj g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 1-2 November , 200 2

### 2. 0 SUMMAR YO FRESULT S

2. 1 Introductio n Thi s sectio n summarize s the tes tprogra m results

. Emission s dat aar e summarize d i n thi s sectio n an d fee d an d proces s operatin g dat aar e include d i n Appendi xB

. 2.2 Stac k

Emissio n Result s fo rPCDDs/PCDF s Asummar yo fth e PCDD/PCD Femissio n result s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 1/ 2 an d Uni t4 ar e include d i n Table s 2-1 , 2-2 , an d 2- 3 respectively

. Thes e result s indicat e that : Th e PCDD/PCD Femission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 1 (averag e emission s fo rrun s 1 an d 2 wer e 0.3 5 ng/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 ) ar e belo wth e HW C MAC Temissio n standar d o f0. 4 ng/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 ) ;

. Th e PCDD/PCD Femission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 2 (averag e emission s fo rrun s 3 an d 4 wer e 1.0 2 ng/m 3 @ 7 % 0 2 ) ar e abov e th e HW C MAC Temissio n standar d o f0. 2 ng/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 ;

•Th e PCDD/PCD Femission s fo rUnit4 (averag e emission s fo rrun s 1 , 2 , an d 3 wer e 0.1 2 ng/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 ) ar e belo wth e HW C MAC Temissio n standar d o f0. 2 ng/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 ; 2.3 Stac k

Emissio n Result s fo rTargetMetal s Asummar yo fth e metal s emission s fo rbot h incinerator s i s provide d i n Table s 2- 4 throug h 2-9

. Table s 2- 4 throug h 2- 6 provid e asummar yo fmetal s emission s categorize d b yLo wVolatil e Metal s (LVM) , Semi-volatil e Metal s (SVM ) an d mercury . Table s 2- 7 throug h 2- 9 provid e adetaile d summaryo fth e individua l metal s emission s fo ral l twelv e metals

. Itshoul d b e note d tha ti twa s necessar yt o perfor m a pos ttes tcalibratio n o n the mete rbo xtha twa s use d fo rth e metal s samplin g trai n (Bo x# 80999)

. Th e resultan tcalibratio n facto ran d Delt aH wer e utilize d fo remission s calculation s i n accordanc e wit h th e specifie d metho d criteri ai n sectio n 4

. Fo rfurthe rdiscussio n regardin g the Metho d 5 post-tes t calibratio n procedure , pleas e refe rt o sectio n 4.2

. Th e targe tmetal s result s indicat e that : Th e LV M an d SV M metal s emission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 1 (averag e emission s fo rrun s 1 an d 2 wer e < 8.3 6 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 fo rLVM s an d 4.1 0 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 fo rSVMs ) wer e lowe rtha n th e ne wHW C MAC Temissio n standard s o f9 7 pg/m 3an d 24 0 pg/m 3(correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) fo rLVM s an d SVM s respectively ;

•Th e mercur yemission s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 1 (averag e fo rrun s 1 an d 2 wer e < 1192.4 0 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 ) wer e abov e th e ne wHW C MAC Temissio n standar d o f13 0 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 . Th e LV M an d SV M metal s emission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 2 (averag e emission s fo rrun s 3 an d 4 wer e < 11.7 7 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2fo rLVMs.an d 8.2 6 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2fo rSVMs ) wer e lowe rtha n th e ne wHW C MAC Temissio n standard s o f9 7 pg/m 3an d 24 0 pg/m 3(correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) fo rLVM s an d SVM s respectively ;

J:\AirJTox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 wor1c\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2- 1 November , 200 2

# ENSR .
Th e mercur yemission s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 2 (averag e fo rrun s 3 an d 4 wer e < 1312.9 8 ug/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 ) wer e abov e th e ne wHW C MAC Temissio n standar d o f13 0 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 . Th e LV M an d SV M metal s emission s fo rUni t4 (averag e emission s fo rthre e (3 ) run s wer e < 89.5 6 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 fo rLVM s an d 106.1 0 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 fo rSVMs ) wer e lowe rtha n th e ne wHW C MAC Temissio n standard s o f9 7 pg/m 3an d 24 0 pg/m 3(correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 ) fo rLVM s an d SVM s respectively ; Th e mercuryemission s fo rUnit4 (averag e emission s fo rthre e (3 ) run s wer e 726.0 2 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 ) wer e abov e th e ne wHW C MAC Temissio n standar d o f13 0 pg/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 . 2. 4 Stac k

Emissio n Result s fo rParticulate matter , HCI , an d Cl 2 Asummar yofthe PM/HCI/CI 2emission s fo rbot h incinerator s i s provide d i n Table s 2-1 0 an d 2-12

. Th e dat ase tshow s emission s o fP M t o b e belo wth e MAC Tlimi to f3 4 mg/dsc m (0.01 5 gr/dscf)

. Emissio n level s fo rHC I an d Cl 2wer e als o wel l belo wth e MAC Tlimi tof7 7 ppm . Th e result s fo rUnit s 3 an d 4 wer e a s follows : Th e particulat e matte remission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 1 (averag e emission s fo rrun s 1 an d 2 wer e 3.8 9 mg/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 )

. Th e particulat e matte remission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 2 (averag e emission s fo rrun s 3 an d 4 wer e 5.3 0 mg/dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 )

. Th e particulat e matte remission s fo rUnit4 (averag e emission s fo rthre e (3 ) run s wer e 33.5 9 mg / dsc m @ 7 % 0 2 )

. Th e HCI/CI 2emission s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 1 (averag e emission s fo rrun s 1 an d 2 wer e 23.2 1 ppm , @7 % 0 2 )

. Th e HCI/CI 2emission s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 2 (averag e emission s fo rrun s 3 an d 4 wer e 11.9 3 ppm , @7%0 2 )

. Th e HCl/Cl 2emission s fo rUnit4 (averag e emission s fo rthre e (3 ) run s wa s 43.6 4 ppm , @7 % 0 2 )

.

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tRles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 lesting\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2- 2 November , 200 2

# ENR .

Tabl e 2- 1 ONY XFixed Hearth Incinerato rUnit3 Conditio n 1 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Result s - TE Q Basi s

Sampl e Volum e R u n No

. Dat e Star tTim e Sto p Tim e Units dsc f 1 22/Aug/0 2 08:0 5 11:2 8 112.14 2 2 22/Aug/0 2 11:5 1 15:0 9 115.64 4 Sampl e Volum e m 3 3.1 8 3.2 7 Moistur e Conten t % v/ v 37. 3 37. 0 0 2Cone

. % v/ v(dry ) 13.4 0 12.8 0 C 0 2Cone

. % v/ v(dry ) 4.7 0 4.5 0 Isokinetic s % 1 0 2 10 1 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,46 3 5,67 8 PCDD/PCD F Parameter s T E F(a ) p g / s a m pi e ng/m 3

T E Q p g /

sampl e ng/m 3

T E Q 2,3,7,8-TCDD TOTALTCDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD TOTALPeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.2.3.6.7.8-

HxCDD 1.2.3.7.8.9-

HxCDD TOTALHxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD TOTALHpCDD OCDD 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 21. 5

2,57 0 139. 0 4,85 0 163. 0 417. 0 280. 0 14,20 0 3,16 0 7,14 0 3,93 0 6.8E-0 3

O.OE+0 0 2.2E-0 2 0.0E+O 0 5. 1 E-0 3 1.3E-0 2 8.8E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 1.0E-0 2 0.0E+0 0 1.2E-0 3 11. 2

3,08 0 73. 9 3,81 0 8 3 2 0 9 1 3 5 8,61 0 1,26 0 2,88 0 1,54 0 3.4E-0 3

0.0E+0 0 1.1E-0 2 0.0E+0 0 2.5E-0 3 6.4E-0 3 4. 1 E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 3.8E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 4.7E-0 4 2,3,7,8-TCDF TOTALTCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF TOTALPeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2.3.4.6.7.8-

HxCDF 1.2.3.7.8.9-

HxCDF TOTALHxCDF 1.2.3.4.6.7.8-

HpCDF 1.2.3.4.7.8.9-

HpCDF TOTALHpCDF OCDF TOTALTEQs

(ng/m3

) TOTALTEQs

(ng/m 1 ® TOTALTEQs

(g/s) 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0

7 % 0 2 ) 2 1 0

6,90 0 3 0 9 6 8 9 7,37 0 4 6 8 4 1 8 6 3 3 1 0 5 5,79 0 1,79 0 1 2 3 2,72 0 3 0 3 6.6E-0 3

0.0 E + 0 0 4.9E-0 3 1.1E-0 1 O.OE+0 0 1.5E-0 2 1.3E-0 2 2.0E-0 2 3.3E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 5.6E-0 3 3.9E-0 4 0.0 E + 0 0 9.5E-0 5 0.24 4 0.45 0 6.3E-1 0 18 1

6,26 0 1 9 7 4 5 7 5,52 0 2 4 3 2 0 9 4 0 4 6 5 3,96 0 6 7 3 8 6 1,43 0 1 4 7 5.5E-0 3

0.0E+0 0 3.0E-0 3 7.0E-0 2 0.0E+0 0 7.4E-0 3 6.4E-0 3 1.2E-0 2 2.OE-0 3 0.0E+0 0 2.1E-0 3 2.6E-0 4 0.0 E + 0 0 4.5E-0 5 0.14 1 0.24 0 3.8E-1 0 ( a ) U.S.EP A(1989 ) Toxi cEquivalenc yFacto r J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Field\Uni t3\fm2 3 unit 3 c1.xls]DAT A

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2- 3 November , 200 2

# ENC R
WTEflf/AT/OIUAt. Tabl e 2- 2 ONY XFixed Heart h Incinerato rUnit3 Conditio n 1 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Results - Congene rClas s Total s

Ru n No

. 1 2 ' x Dat e 22/Aug/0 2 22/Aug/0 2 Star tTim e 08:0 5 11:5 1 Sto p Tim e 1 In ite 11:2 8 15:0 9 Sampl e Volum e O f If t o dsc f 112.14 2 115.64 4 Sampl e Volum e m 3 3.17 6 3.2 7 Moistur e Conten t % v/ v 37. 3 37. 0 0 2Cone

. % v/ v(dry ) 13. 4 12. 8 C 0 2Cone

. % v/ v(dry ) 4. 7 4. 5 Isokinetic s % 10 2 10 1 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,46 3 5,67 8 % PCDD/PCD F pg / pg / Parameter s sampl e ng/m 3 sampl e ng/m 3

: f : TOTALTCDD 2,57 0 8. 1 E-0 1 3,08 0 9.4E-0 1 x ; TOTALPeCDD 4,85 0 1.5E+0 0 3,81 0 1.2E+0 0 ••: ] :;: TOTALHxCDD 14,20 0 4.5E+0 0 8,61 0 2.6E+0 0 ji: ; !: TOTALHpCDD 7,14 0 2.2E+0 0 2,88 0 8.8E-0 1 > OCDD 3,93 0 1.2E+0 0 1,540 4.7E-0 1 x | TOTALTCDF 6,90 0 2.2E+0 0 6,26 0 1.9E+0 0 x ;

• xTOTALPeCDF 7,37 0 2.3E+0 0 5,52 0 1.7E+0 0 ; x <:[ TOTALHxCDF 5,79 0 1.8E+0 0 3,96 0 1.2E+0 0 : xHpCDF 2,72 0 8.6E-0 1 1,43 0 4.4E-0 1
: OCDF 30 3 9.5E-0 2 14 7 4.5E-0 2

XTOTALtetra-octa

(ng/m') = 17. 6

• TOTALtetra-octa

(ng/m'@

7 % O,) = 32. 4 19. 4 TOTALtetra-octa

(g/s) = 4.5E-0 8 3.0E-0 8

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiies\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2- 4 November , 200 2

# ENSft. mre/iAiariOKAL Tabl e 2- 3 ONY XFixed Heart h Incinerato rUnit3 Conditio n 2 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Results - TE Q Basi s

R u n No

. 3 4 Dat e 22/Aug/0 2 23/Aug/0 2 Star tTim e 15:3 8 07:5 2 Sto p Tim e / In iff: 18:4 1 10:5 4 Sampl e Volum e LI II1 t o dsc f 119.78 8 109.87 4 Sampl e Volum e m 3 3.3 9 3.1 1 Moistur e Conten t % v/ v 36. 5 36. 7 O zCone

. % v/ v(dry ) 13.0 0 13.2 0 C Q 2Cone

. % v/ v(dry ) 4.5 0 4.8 0 Isokinetic s % 1 0 2 1 0 2 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,82 9 5,36 7 PCDD/PCD F Parameter s T E F(a ) p g / sampl e ng/m 3

T E Q p g /

sampl e ng/m 3

T E Q 2,3,7,8-TCDD TOTALTCDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD TOTALPeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.2.3.6.7.8-

HxCDD 1.2.3.7.8.9-

HxCDD TOTALHxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD TOTALHpCDD OCDD 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 40. 0

12,20 0 305. 0 14,30 0 317. 0 993. 0 555. 0 25,00 0 5,46 0 12,10 0 5,96 0 1.2E-0 2

0.0E+0 0 4.5E-0 2 0.0E+0 0 9.3E-0 3 2.9E-0 2 1.6E-0 2 O.OE+0 0 1.6E-0 2 O.OE+0 0 1.8E-0 3 28. 1

6,91 0 217. 0 8,76 0 2 2 9 6 0 8 3 9 1 15,20 0 3,40 0 7,72 0 3,59 0 9.0E-0 3

0.0E+0 0 3.5E-0 2 0.0E+0 0 7.4E-0 3 2.0E-0 2 1.3E-0 2 0.0E+0 0 1. 1 E-0 2 O.OE+0 0 1.2E-0 3 2,3,7,8-TCDF TOTALTCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF TOTALPeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2.3.4.6.7.8-

HxCDF 1.2.3.7.8.9-

HxCDF TOTALHxCDF 1.2.3.4.6.7.8-

HpCDF 1.2.3.4.7.8.9-

HpCDF TOTALHpCDF OCDF TOTALTEQs

(ng/m3

) 0.1 0

0.0 0 0.0 5 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 65 1

23,80 0 6 9 6 1,86 0 24,90 0 1,19 0 9 5 4 2,76 0 4 6 0 22,80 0 3,23 0 8 9 2 10,30 0 1,31 0 1.9E-0 2

0.0E+0 0 1.0E-0 2 2.7E-0 1 O.OE+0 0 3.5E-0 2 2.8E-0 2 8.1E-0 2 1.4E-0 2 O.OE+0 0 9.5E-0 3 2.6E-0 3 0.0E+O 0 3.9E-0 4 0.60 4 4 4 8

23,10 0 7 2 4 1,69 0 25,80 0 9 5 8 9 6 2 2,25 0 2 9 2 19,40 0 2,38 0 4 6 6 5,92 0 5 7 9 1.4E-0 2

0.0E+0 0 1.2E-0 2 2.7E-0 1 O.OE+0 0 3. 1 E-0 2 3. 1 E-0 2 7.2E-0 2 9.4E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 7.6E-0 3 1.5E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 1.9E-0 4 0.54 6 TOTALTEQs

(ng/m3

@ 7 % O 2 ) TOTALTEQs

(g/s) 1.05 7 1.7E-0 9 0.98 0 1.4E-0 9 (a ) U.S.EP A(1989 ) Toxi cEquivalenc yFacto r

J:V\ir_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 !esting\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2- 5 November

. 200 2Tabl e 2- 4 ONY XFixe d Hearth Incinerato rUnit3 Conditio n 2 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Results - Congene rClas s Total s

Ru n No

. 3 4 Dat e 22/Aug/0 2 23/Aug/0 2 Star tTim e 15:3 8 07:5 2 Sto p Tim e 1 lnit<z 18:4 1 10:5 4 Sampl e Volum e IJI f f I O dsc f 119.78 8 109.87 4 Sampl e Volum e m 3 3.39 2 3.1 1 Moistur e Conten t % v/ v 36. 5 36. 7 0 2Cone

. % v/ v(dry ) 13. 0 13. 2 C 0 2Cone

. % v/ v(dry ) 4. 5 4. 8 Isokinetic s % 10 2 10 2 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,82 9 5,36 7 PCD D / PCD F pg / pg / Parameter s sampl e ng/m 3 sampl e ng/m 3
:•: TOTALTCDD 12,20 0 3.6E+0 0 6,91 0 2.2E+0 0 •:iTOTALPeCDD 14,30 0 4.2E+0 0 8,76 0 2.8E+0 0 : :TOTALHxCDD 25,00 0 7.4E+0 0 15,20 0 4.9E+0 0 >: TOTALHpCDD 12,10 0 3.6E+0 0 7,72 0 2.5E+0 0 :: :OCDD 5,96 0 1.8E+0 0 3,59 0 1.2E+0 0 >> TOTALTCDF 23,80 0 7.0E+0 0 23,10 0 7.4E+0 0 :> TOTALPeCDF 24,90 0 7.3E+0 0 25,80 0 8.3E+0 0 TOTALHxCDF 22,80 0 6.7E+0 0 19,40 0 • 6.2E+0 0
: :; TOTALHpCDF 10,30 0 3.0E+0 0 5,92 0 1.9E+0 0 : OCDF 1,31 0 3.9E-0 1 57 9 1.9E-0 1

: : TOTALtetra-octa

(ng/m3 ) 45. 0 37. 6 : : TOTALtetra-octa

(ng/m'@

7 % 0 ,) 78. 8 67. 5
: TOTAL

tetra-octa

(g/s) 1.2E-0 7 9.5E-0 8

J:\Air_Tox\Prpjec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Re!d\Uni t3\(m2 3 unit 3 c1.xls]DAT A

J:\Air_Tox\Projec 1 Fi)es\Onyx\Ony x200 2 worWVu g 0 2 iesting\Report\Ony x2* 6 Report2.do c November , 200 2

# ENSR .
Tabl e 2- 5 ONY XFixed Heart h Incinerato rUnit4 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Results - TE Q Basi s

Ru n No

. 1 2 3 Dat e 20/Aug/0 2 20/Aug/0 2 21/Aug/0 2 Star tTim e 09:3 5 14:1 0 09:4 5 Sto p Tim e 12:5 7 17:4 3 12:3 5 Sampl e Volum e will t o dsc f 129.10 0 126.52 1 131.16 3 Sampl e Volum e m 3 3.6 6 3.5 8 3.7 1 Moistur e Conten t % v/ v 36. 3 37. 0 36. 5 0 2Cone

. : % v/v(dry ) 13.5 0 13.7 0 13.9 0 C O zCone

. % v/v(dry ) 4.7 0 4.0 0 4.0 0 Isokinetic s % 10 1 10 1 10 1 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 16,50 7 16,17 3 16,78 8 PCDD/PCD F Parameter s T E F(a ) p g / sampl e ng/m 3

T E Q p g /

sampl e ng/m 3

T E Q p g /

sampl e ng/m 3

T E Q 2,3,7,8-TCDD TOTALTCDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD TOTALPeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1.2.3.6.7.8-

HxCDD 1.2.3.7.8.9-

HxCDD TOTALHxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD TOTALHpCDD OCDD 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 10. 4

1,56 0 46. 5 1,68 0 51. 6 108. 0 70. 7 2,28 0 5 8 5 1,28 0 5 3 8 2.8E-0 3

O.OE+0 0 6.4E-0 3 O.OE+0 0 1.4E-0 3 3.0E-0 3 1.9E-0 3 O.OE+0 0 1.6E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 1.5E-0 4 6. 7

1,41 0 40. 1 1,56 0 4 3 9 7 5 9 2,06 0 4 9 0 1,07 0 4 4 2 1.9E-0 3

0.0E+0 0 5.6E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 1.2E-0 3 2.7E-0 3 1.7E-0 3 O.OE+0 0 1.4E-0 3 O.OE+0 0 1.2E-0 4 15. 0

2,280. 0 67. 4 2,500. 0 77. 1 162. 0 113. 0 3,43 0 8 8 0 1,91 0 7 9 4 4.OE-0 3

O.OE+0 0 9. 1 E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 2. 1 E-0 3 4.4E-0 3 3.0E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 2.4E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 2. 1 E-0 4 2,3,7,8-TCDF TOTALTCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF TOTALPeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2.3.4.6.7.8-

HxCDF 1.2.3.7.8.9-

HxCDF TOTALHxCDF 1.2.3.4.6.7.8-

HpCDF 1.2.3.4.7.8.9-

HpCDF TOTALHpCDF OCDF TOTALTEQs

(ng/m3

) TOTALTEQs

(ng/m3

@ 7 "A TOTALTEQs

(g/s) 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0 0.0 0

0 3 ) 5 7

2,02 0 7 9 1 6 3 1,61 0 1 0 7 1 1 5 1 7 9 4 5 1,21 0 3 3 8 5 3 5 6 3 1 2 4 1.5E-0 3

0.0E+0 0 1. 1 E-0 3 2.2E-0 2 O.OE+0 0 2.9E-0 3 3.1E-0 3 4.9E-0 3 1.2E-0 3 0.0E+0 0 9.2E-0 4 1. 5 E-0 4 0.0E+0 0 3.4E-0 5

. 0.05 5 0.10 4 4.3E-1 0 4 8

1,93 0 7 5 1 5 0 1,50 0 10 1 9 7 1 6 2 3 6 1,08 0 2 7 7 4 4 4 7 1 1 0 2 1.4E-0 3

0.0E+0 0 1.OE-0 3 2. 1 E-0 2 O.OE+0 0 2.8E-0 3 2 . 7 E-0 3 4.5E-0 3 1.OE-0 3 0.0E+0 0 7.7E-0 4 1.2E-0 4 0.0E+0 0 2.8E-0 5 0.05 0 0.09 6 3.8E-1 0 8 3

3,00 0 1 1 7 2 3 0 2,27 0 1 5 4 1 5 8 2 4 4 5 4 1,65 0 4 2 6 6 7 6 9 0 1 4 6 2.2E-0 3

0.0E+0 0 1.6E-0 3 3. 1 E-0 2 0.0E+0 0 4. 1 E-0 3 4.3E-0 3 6.6E-0 3 1.5E-0 3 O.OE+0 0 1. 1 E-0 3 1.8E-0 4 0.0E+0 0 3.9E-0 5 0.07 8 0.15 3 6.2E-1 0 (a )

. U.S.EP A(1989 ) Toxi cEquivalenc yFacto r J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Field\Uni t4\[m2 3 Unit4.xls]DAT A

J:\Air_Tox\Projec l Files\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2- 7 November , 200 2WTERNATfONAL Tabl e 2- 6 Fixe d Heart h Incinerato rUnit4 PCDD/PCD FEmissio n Results - Congene r Clas s Total s

Ru n No

. 1 2 3 Dat e 20/Aug/0 2 20/Aug/0 2 21/Aug/0 2 Star tTim e 09:3 5 14:1 0 09:4 5 Sto p Tim e 1 Inito: 12:5 7 17:4 3 12:3 5 Sampl e Volum e \JI //to dsc f 129.10 0 126.52 1 131.16 3 Sampl e Volum e m 3 3.65 6 3.5 8 3.7 1 Moistur e Conten t % v/ v 36. 3 37. 0 36. 5 0 2Cone

. % v/ v(dry ) 13. 5 13. 7 13. 9 C 0 2Cone

. % v/ v(dry ) 4. 7 4. 0 4. 0 Isokinetic s % 10 1 10 1 10 1 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 16,50 7 16,17 3 16,78 8 !> : PCD D /

PCD F pg / pg / pg / Parameter s sampl e ng/m 3 sampl e ng/m 3 sampl e ng/m 3 TOTALTCDD 1,56 0 4.3E-0 1 1,41 0 3.9E-0 1 - 2,28 0 6. 1 E-0 1 :[•; TOTALPeCDD 1,68 0 4.6E-0 1 1,56 0 4.4E-0 1 2,500. 0 6.7E-0 1 xTOTALHxCDD 2,28 0 6.2E-0 1 2,06 0 5.7E-0 1 3,43 0 9.2E-0 1 TOTALHpCDD 1,28 0 3.5E-0 1 1,07 0 3.0E-0 1 1,91 0 5. 1 E-0 1 OCDD 53 8 1.5E-0 1 44 2 1.2E-0 1 79 4 2. 1 E-0 1 TOTALTCDF 2,02 0 5.5E-0 1 1,93 0 5.4E-0 1 3,00 0 8. 1 E-0 1 TOTALPeCDF 1,61 0 4.4E-0 1 1,50 0 4.2E-0 1 2,27 0 6. 1 E-0 1 TOTALHxCDF 1,21 0 3.3E-0 1 1,08 0 3.0E-0 1 1,65 0 4.4E-0 1 TOTALHpCDF 56 3 1.5E-0 1 47 1 1.3E-0 1 69 0 1.9E-0 1 OCDF 12 4 3.4E-0 2 10 2 2.8E-0 2 14 6 3.9E-0 2

TOTALtetra-octa

(ng/m3 ) = 3. 5 3. 2 5. 0 TOTALtetra-octa

(ng/mJ @ 7 %0 2 ) = 6. 6 6. 2 9- 9 TOTALtetra-octa

(g/s) = 2.7E-0 8 2.5E-0 8 4.0E-0 8

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Fietd\Uni t4\{m2 3 Unit4.xls]DAT A

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 woriMu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2- 8 November , 200 2

# ENSR. WTeKflAT/OflAL

Tabl e 2- 7 Summar

yo fHWC MAC TMetal s Emission s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 1

Lo wVolatil e Metal s Emission s micrograms/m 3@ 7

% O , Metal s Run l Run 2 Averag e A s 1.62 1.8 3 1.72 B e < 0.0 7 < 0.0 7 < 0.0 7 C r 5.4 3 7.7 1 6.5 7 Tota l LV M < 7.1 2 < 9.6 1 < 8.3 6 LV M RegulatoryStandar d = 9 7 micrograms/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 Semi-Volatil e Meta l Emission s micrograms/m 3@ 7

% O i Metal s Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Averag e P b 4.0 4 3.7 2 3.8 8 C d 0.2 4 0.2 1 0.2 2 Tota l SV M 4.2 8 3.9 3 4.1 0 SV M Regulator

yStandard = 24 0 micrograms/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 Mercur yEmission s micrograms/m 3@ 7

% O 2 Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Averag e < 1296.8 5 1087.9 5 < 1192.4 0 Mercur yRegulator

yStandar d = 130 micrograms/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 wonWAu g 0 2 testing\Field\Uni t4\{m2 9 Un'it4.xls]EMISSpg 3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x2~ 9 Report2.do c November , 200 2

# ENSR.

Tabl e 2- 8 Summar

yo fHW C MAC TMetal s Emission s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 2

Lo wVolatil e Metal s Emission s micrograms/m 3@ 7

% O 2 Metal s Run l Run 2 Averag e A s 3.2 2 1.72 2.4 7 B e < 0.0 7 < 0.0 7 < 0.0 7 C r 7.4 3 11.0 2 9.2 3 Tota l LV M < 10.7 2 < 12.8 1 < 11.7 7 LV M RegulatoryStandar d = 9 7 micrograms/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 Semi-Volatil e Meta l Emission s micrograms/m 3@ 7

% 0 2 Metal s Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Averag e P b 5.5 1 8.7 4 7.1 2 C d 1.7 9 0.4 9 1.1 4 Tota l SV M 7.3 0 9.2 2 8.2 6 SV M Regulator

yStandar d = 24 0 micrograms/m 3@ 7 % Q 2 Mercur yEmission s micrograms/m 3@ 7

% 0 2 Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Averag e 1311.8 0 1314.1 7 1312.9 8 Mercur yRegulator

yStandard = 130 micrograms/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 J-Mir_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\FiekJ\Uni t4\[m2 9 Unit4.x.s]EMlSSpg 3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x2-1 0 Report2.do c November , 200 2

# ENSR.

Tabl e 2- 9 Summar

yo fHW C MAC TMetal s Emission s fo rUnit4



### Lo wVolatil e Metal s Emission s micrograms/m 3(

g I 7 % 0 2 Metal s Run l Run 2 Run s 3 Averag e A s 48.1 5 37.6 8 52.1 3 45.9 9 B e < 0.0 7 < 0.0 7 < 0.0 8 < 0.0 8 C r 37.4 9 38.6 9 54.0 8 43.4 2 Tota l LV M 85.7 1 76.4 4 106.2 9 < 89.4 8 LV M RegulatoryStandar d = 9 7 micrograms/m 3@ 7 % 0 2 

### Semi-Volatil e Meta l Emission s micrograms/m 3(

5 I 7 % 0 2 Metal s Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Run s 3 Averag e P b 78.9 3 92.9 0 137.0 0 102.9 4 C d 1.6 0 1.2 3 6.3 5 3.0 6 Tota l SV M 80.5 4 94.1 3 143.3 6 106.0 1 SV M RegulatoryStandar d = 24 0 micrograms/m 3@ 7 % 0 2



### Mercur yEmission s micrograms/m 3(

5 £7 % O z i^K

r Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Averag e 261.8 7 368.6 7 1546.5 2 725.6 9 MercuryRegulatoryStandar d = 13 0 micrograms/m 3 @ 7 % 0 2 J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Field\Uni t4\[m2 9 Unit4;x!s]EMISSpg 3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x. 200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-1 1 November , 200 2/NT£/!tiaT/ON*t.

Tabl e 2-1 0 Summar

yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 1

R u n No

. Dat e Star tTi m e Sto p Ti m e Unit s R u n 1 22-Aug-0 2 08:0 5 10:1 2 R u n 2

22-Aug-0 2 1 1 :5 2 14:1 0 AVG S Samplin g Parameter s — Barometri cPressur e Volu m e M etere d S a m pi e Volum e M oistur e 0 2a tStac k Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. Stac k Flowrat e Isokinetic s in

. H g d c f dsc f % v/ v % dr y
° F dscf m % 29.6 0

93.64 3 88.54 2 37. 3 13.4 0 3 6 0 5,74 0 1 0 7 29.6 0

96.00 4 89.05 1 33. 3 12.8 0 3 6 3 6,05 3 1 0 2 29.6 0

94.82 4 88.79 6 35. 3 13.1 0 3 6 1 5,89 6 1 0 4 Arse n i cC A— Quantit yCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e L V M u g MQ/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c 2.2 0

1.6 2 1.89E-0 5 2.38E-0 6 2.7 0 1.8 3 2. 4 3 E- 0 5 3.06E-0 6 2.4 5 1.7 2 2.16E-0 5 2.72E-0 6 Bervlliu m fBe > — Q uantit yCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e L V M p g pg/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c < 0.1 0

< 0.0 7 < 8.58E-0 7 < 1.08E-0 7 < 0.1 0

< 0.0 7 < 8.99E-0 7 < 1.13E-Q 7 < 0.1 0

< 0.0 7 < 8.78E-0 7 < 1.11E-0 7 Tota ) Chromiu m (Cr ) — Quantit yCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e L V M u g pg/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c 7.3 9

5.4 3 6.34E-0 5 7.99E-0 6 11.3 9 7.7 1 1.02E-0 4 1.29E-0 5 9.3 9 6.5 7 8.29E-0 5 1.04E-0 5 Cadmiu m fC< n — Quantit yCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 Stac k E m issio n Rat e S V M M 9 Mg/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c 0.3 2

0.2 4 2.74E-0 6 3.46E-0 7 0.3 1 0.2 1 2.79E-0 6 3.5 1 E-0 7 0.3 2 0.2 2 2.77E-0 6 3.48E-0 7 Lea d (Pb ) - - Q uantit yCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % O z Stac k Emissio n Rat e S V M u g pg/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c 5.5 0

4.0 4 4.72E-0 5 5.94E-0 6 5.5 0 3.7 2 4.94E-0 5 6.23E-0 6 5.5 0 3.8 8 4.83E-0 5 6.09E-0 6 L V M Tota l = S V M Tota l = pg/ m 3 pg/m 3 .7.1 2

4.2 8 9.6 1

3.9 3 8.3 6

4.1 0

i 0 2 testing\PieId\ U ni t3\I M 2 9 Uni t3 d .xls]E M I S S pg 3 (continued ) P g 1 oT 3

J:V\ir_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-1 2 November , 200 2

# ENv R

Tabl e 2-1 0 (Continued ) Summar yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 1 Ru n No

. Dat e StartTim e Sto p Tim e Unit s Ru n 1 22-Aug-0 2 08:0 5 10:1 2 Ru n 2

22-Aug-0 2 11:5 2 14:1 0 AVG S Samplin gParameter s Barometri cPressur e Volum e Metere d Sampl e Volum e Moistur e 0 2atStac k Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. Stac k Flowrat e Isokinetic s in

. H g dcf dsc f % v/ v % dr y ° F dscf m % 29.6 0

93.64 3 88.54 2 37. 3 13.4 0 36 0 5,74 0 10 7 29.6 0

96.00 4 89.05 1 33. 3 12.8 0 36 3 6,05 3 10 2 29.6 0

94.82 4 88.79 6 35. 3 13.1 0 36 1 5,89 6 10 4 Mercur y("Hg'

) — QuantityCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e V M u g pg/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c 1765. 1

1296. 8 1.5 1 E-0 2 1.9 1 E-0 3 1606. 9

1087. 9 1.44E-0 2 1.82E-0 3 < 1686. 0

< 1192. 4 < 1.48E-0 2 < 1.86E-0 3 Antimon y(Sb ) — QuantityCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e M O pg/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c 0.2 7

0.2 0 2.32E-0 6 2.92E-0 7 0.2 5

0.1 7 2.25E-0 6 2.83E-0 7 0. 3

0. 2 2.28E-0 6 2.87E-0 7 Bariu m(Ba l— Quantit yCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e u g pg/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c 29.3 9

21.5 9 2.52E-0 4 3.18E-0 5 36.3 9

24.6 4 3.27E-0 4 4.12E-0 5 32. 9

23. 1 2.90E-0 4 3.65E-0 5 Silve r(Ag ) - QuantityCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e M 9 pg/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c < 9.8 0 < 7.2 0 < 8.40E-0 5 < 1.06E-0 5 0.3 9

0.2 6 3.5 1 E-0 6 4.42E-0 7 < 5. 1

< 3. 7 < 4.38E-0 5 < 5.52E-0 6 Thalliu m(Tl ) - QuantityCollecte d Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % O z Stac k Emissio n Rat e M 9 pg/m 3 Ib/h r g/se c < 0.5 0 < 0.3 7 < 4.29E-0 6 < 5.40E-0 7 < 0.5 0

< 0.3 4 < 4.50E-0 6 < 5.66E-0 7 < 0. 5

< 0. 4 < 4.39E-0 6 < 5.53E-0 7

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Field\ t(continued ) P g 2 o f3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x2-1 3 November , 200 2 Report2.do c

# EIKR
MKRf/AT/ONAL Tabl e 2-1 0 (Continued ) Summar yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 1
Ru n No . Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Dat e 22-Aug-0 2 22-Aug-0 2 StartTim e Unit s 08:0 5 11:5 2 Sto p Tim e 10:1 2 14:1 0 AVG S Samplin gParameter s — Barometri cPressur e in

. H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.6 0 Volum e Metere d dc f 93.64 3 96.00 4 94.82 4 Sampl e Volum e dsc f 88.54 2 89.05 1 88.79 6 Moistur e % v/ v 37. 3 33. 3 35. 3 O zatStac k %dr y 13.4 0 12.8 0 13.1 0 Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. ° F 36 0 36 3 36 1 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,74 0 6,05 3 5,89 6 Isokinetic s % 10 7 10 2 10 4 Nicke l(Ni ) - Quantit yCollecte d p g 21.3 9 31.3 9 26. 4 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 15.7 2 21.2 5 18. 5 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 1.83E-0 4 2.82E-0 4 2.33E-0 4 g/se c 2.3 1 E-0 5 3.56E-0 5 2.93E-0 5 Seleniu m(Se ) — Quantit yCollecte d p g 1.6 0 1.70 1. 7 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 1.1 8 1.1 5 1. 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 1.37E-0 5 1.53E-0 5 1.45E-0 5 g/se c 1.73E-0 6 1.93E-0 6 1.83E-0 6
J:\Air_Tox\Projec tRes\0nyx\0ny x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Reld\Uni t3\[ M 2 9 Uni t3 c2.xls]DAT AP g 3 o f3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-1 4 November , 200 2

# ENSR.
Tabl e 2-1 1 Summar

yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUnit3 Conditio n 2

R u n No

. R u n 3 R u n 4 Dat e 22-Aug-0 2 23-Aug-0 2 Star tTim e Unit s 15:4 1 075 2 Sto p Tim e 17:4 6 095 6 AVG S Samplin gParameter s — Barometri cPressur e i n

. H g 29.6 0 29.4 5 29.5 3 Volum e Metere d d c f 93.07 7 94.11 1 93.59 4 Sampl e Volum e dsc f 86.40 1 88.50 9 87.45 5 Moistur e % v/v 33. 8 33. 7 33. 8 0 2a tStac k % dr y 13.0 0 13.2 0 13.1 0 Avg . Stac k

Temp

. ° F 3 8 3 3 8 4 3 8 3 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,65 7 5,80 2 5,73 0 Isokinetic s % 1 0 6 1 0 6 10 6 Arseni c(As ) — L V M Quantit yCollecte d M 9 4.5 0 2.4 0 3.4 5 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % O z pg /m 3 3.2 2 1.7 2 2.4 7 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 3.90E-0 5 2.08E-0 5 2.99E-0 5 g/se c 4.91E-0 6 2.62E-0 6 3.77E-0 6 Berylliu m(Be ) — L V M Quantit yCollecte d < 0.1 0 < 0.1 0 < 0.1 0 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 ug/m 3 < 0.0 7 < 0.0 7 < 0.0 7 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r < 8.66E-0 7 < 8.67E-0 7 < 8.67E-0 7 g/se c < 1.09E-0 7 < 1.09E-0 7 < 1.09E-0 7 Tota lChromiu m(Cr ) — L V M Quantit yCollecte d P 9 < 10.3 9 15.3 9 12.8 9 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 7.4 3 11.0 2 9.2 3 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r < 9.00E-0 5 1.33E-0 4 1.12E-0 4 g/se c < 1.13E-0 5 1.68E-0 5 1.4 1 E-0 5 Cadmiu m(Cd ) — S V M Quantit yCollecte d p g 2.5 0 0.6 8 1.5 9 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg /m 3 1.7 9 0.4 9 1.1 4 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 2.17E-0 5 5.90E-0 6 1.38E-0 5 g/se c 2.73E-0 6 7.43E-0 7 1.74E-0 6 Lea d(Pb ) - S V M Quantit yCollecte d p g 7.7 0 12.2 0 9.9 5 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 5.5 1 8.7 4 7.1 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e lb/h r 6.67E-0 5 1.0 6 E-0 4 8.62E-0 5 g/se c 8.40E-0 6 1.33E-0 5 1.09E-0 5 L V M Tota l= pg/m 3 10.7 2 12.8 1 11.7 7 S V M Tota l= pg/m 3 7.3 0 9.2 2 8.2 6

I 0 2 testmg\Field\Uni t3\[ M 2 9 Uni t3 c2.xls]EMlSSpg 3 (continued ) P g 1 o f3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 worWAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-1 5 November , 200 2

# ENSR.
Tabl e 2-1 1 (Cpntinued ) Summar yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 2
Ru n No

. Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Dat e 22-Aug-0 2 23-Aug-0 2 StartTim e Unit s 15:4 1 075 2 Sto p Tim e 17:4 6 095 6 AVG S Samplin gParameter s — Barometri cPressur e in

. H g 29.6 0 29.4 5 29.5 3 Volum e Metere d dcf 93.07 7 94.11 1 93.59 4 Sampl e Volum e dsc f 86.40 1 88.50 9 87.45 5 Moistur e % v/ v 33. 8 33. 7 33. 8 0 2atStac k % dr y 13.0 0 13.2 0 13.1 0 Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. ° F 38 3 38 4 38 3 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,65 7 5,80 2 5,73 0 Isokinetic s % 10 6 10 6 10 6 Mercur y(Hg ) — V M Quantit yCollecte d P 9 1834. 0 1835. 1 1834. 5 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2. pg/m 3 1311. 8 1314. 2 1313. 0 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 1.59E-0 2 1.59E-0 2 1.5 9 E-0 2 g/se c 2.00E-0 3 2.00E-0 3 2.00E-0 3 Antimon y(Sb ) — Quantit yCollecte d M 9 0.2 6 0.1 6 0. 2 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 0.1 9 0.1 1 0. 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 2.25E-0 6 1.39E-0 6 1.82E-0 6 g/se c 2.84E-0 7 1.75E-0 7 2.29E-0 7 Bariu m(Ba ) — Quantit yCollecte d u g 29.3 9 41.3 9 35. 4 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 21.0 2 29.6 4 25. 3 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 2.55E-0 4 3.59E-0 4 3.07E-0 4 g/se c 3.2 1 E-0 5 4.52E-0 5 3.86E-0 5 Silve r(Ag ) - Quantit yCollecte d P 9 < 5.4 0 < 6.8 0 < 6. 1 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 3.8 6 < 4.8 7 < 4. 4 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r < 4.68E-0 5 < 5.90E-0 5 < 5.29E-0 5 g/se c < 5.89E-0 6 < 7.43E-0 6 < 6.66E-0 6 Thalliu m(Tl ) - Quantit yCollecte d p g < 0.5 0 < 0.5 0 < 0. 5 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 0.3 6 < 0.3 6 < 0. 4 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r < 4.3 3 E-0 6 < 4.34E-0 6 < 4.33E-0 6 g/se c < 5.46E-0 7 < 5.46E-0 7 < 5.46E-0 7

J:\Ai.r_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workAAu g 0 2 testing\Field U (continued ) P g 2 o f3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-1 6 November , 200 2Tabl e 2-1 1 (Continued ) Summar yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUni t3 Conditio n 2
Ru n No

. Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Dat e 22-Aug-0 2 23-Aug-0 2 StartTim e Unit s \ 15:4 1 075 2 Sto p Tim e 17:4 6 095 6 AVG S Samplin gParameter s — Barometri cPressur e in

. H g 29.6 0 29.4 5 29.5 3 Volum e Metere d dc f 93.07 7 94.11 1 93.59 4 Sampl e Volum e dsc f 86.40 1 88.50 9 87.45 5 Moistur e % v/ v 33. 8 33. 7 33. 8 0 2atStac k % dr y 13.0 0 13.2 0 13.1 0 Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. ° F 38 3 38 4 38 3 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,65 7 5,80 2 5,73 0 Isokinetic s % 10 6 10 6 10 6 Nickel(Ni ) - QuantityCollecte d M 9 34.3 9 35.3 9 34. 9 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % O z pg/m 3 24. 6 25.3 4 25. 0 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 2.98E-0 4 3.07E-0 4 3.02E-0 4 g/se c 3.75E-0 5 3.87E-0 5 3.8 1 E-0 5 Seleniu m(Se ) — QuantityCollecte d p g < 1.0 0 < 1.0 0 < 1. 0 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 0.7 2 < 0.7 2 < 0. 7 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r < 8.66E-0 6 < 8.67E-0 6 < 8.67E-0 6 g/se c < 1.09E-0 6 < 1.09E-0 6 < 1.09E-0 6
J:\Air_ToxVProjectFiles\Onyx\Onyx200 2 workAAu g 0 2 testing\Field\Uni t3\IM2 9 Uni t3 c2.xls]DAT APg 3 of3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 lesting\Report\Ony x2-1 7 Repart2.do c November

. 200 2

# ENSR .
Tabl e 2-1 2 Summar

yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUnit4

R u n No

. R u n 1 R u n 2 R u n 3 Dat e 20-Aug-0 2 20-Aug-0 2 21-Aug-0 2 Star tTim e Unit s 09:3 5 14:1 0 11:4 3 Sto p Tim e 12:0 2 16:3 0 14:0 3 AVG S Samplin gParameter s — Barometri cPressur e in

. H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.5 5 29.5 8 Volum e Metere d d c f 95.25 0 100.90 0 91.33 2 95.82 7 Sampl e Volum e dsc f 90.22 0 93.31 4 85.49 0 89,67 5 Moistur e % v/ v 35. 7 30. 7 36. 6 34. 4 0 2a tStac k % dr y 13.5 0 13.7 0 13.9 0 13.7 0 Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. ° F 3 7 9 3 8 1 3 9 2 3 8 4 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 16,01 0 17,46 2 15,66 1 16,37 7 Isokinetic s % 1 0 9 1 0 3 1 0 6 1 0 6 Arseni c(As ) — L V M Quantit yCollecte d P 9 66.0 0 52.0 0 64.0 0 60.6 7 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 48.2 2 37.7 4 52.1 3 46.0 3 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 1.55E-0 3 1.29E-0 3 1.55E-0 3 1.46E-0 3 g/se c 1.95E-0 4 1.62E-0 4 1.95E-0 4 1.84E-0 4 Berylliu m(Be ) - - L V M Quantit yCollecte d p g < 0.1 0 < 0.1 0 < 0.1 0 < 0.1 0 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 0.0 7 < 0.07 3 < 0.08 1 < 0.0 8 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r < 2.35E-0 6 < 2.48E-0 6 < 2.42E-0 6 < 2.42E-0 6 g/se c < 2.96E-0 7 < 3.12E-0 7 < 3.05E-0 7 < 3.04E-0 7 Tota lChromiu m(Cr) - L V M Quantit yCollecte d p g 51.3 9 53.3 9 66.3 9 57.0 6 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 37.5 5 38.7 5 54.0 8 43.4 6 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 1.2 1 E-0 3 1.32E-0 3 " 1.6 1 E-0 3 1.38E-0 3 g/se c 1.52E-0 4 1.67E-0 4 2.03E-0 4 1.74E-0 4 Cadmiu m(Cd ) — S V M Quantit yCollecte d P 9 2.2 0 1.7 0 7.8 0 3.9 0 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % O z pg/m 3 1.6 1 1.2 3 6.3 5 3.0 6 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 5.16E-0 5 4.2 1 E-0 5 1.89E-0 4 9.42E-0 5 g/se c 6.5 1 E-0 6 5.30E-0 6 2.38E-0 5 1.19E-0 5 Lead(Pb ) - S V M Quantit yCollecte d P 9 108.2 0 128.2 0 168.2 0 134.8 7 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 79.0 6 93.0 4 137.00

. 103.0 3 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 2.54E-0 3 3.17E-0 3 4.08E-0 3 3.26E-0 3 g/se c 3.20E-0 4 4.00E-0 4 5.14E-0 4 4.1 1 E-0 4 L V M Tota l = pg/m 3 85.8 4 76.5 6 106.2 9 89.5 6 S V M Tota l = pg/m 3 80.6 6 94.2 8 143.3 6 106.1 0

j g 0 2 testing\Field\Uni t4\[m2 9 Unit4.recal..xls]DAT A(continued ) P g 1 o f3

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-1 8 November , 200 2

# EN R

Tabl e 2-1 2 (Continued ) Summar yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUnit4

R u n No

. R u n 1 R u n 2 R u n 3 Dat e 20-Aug-0 2 20-Aug-0 2 21-Aug-0 2 Star tTim e Unit s 09:3 5 14:1 0 11:4 3 Sto p Tim e 12:0 2 16:3 0 14:0 3

. AVG S Samplin gParameter s — Barometri cPressur e i n

. H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.5 5 29.5 8 Volum e Metere d d c f 95.25 0 100.90 0 91.33 2 95.82 7 Sampl e Volum e dsc f 90.22 0 93.31 4 85.49 0 89.67 5 Moistur e % v/ v 35. 7 30. 7 36. 6 34. 4 0 2a tStac k % dr y 13.5 0 13.7 0

. 13.9 0 13.7 0 Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. ° F 3 7 9 3 8 1 3 9 2 3 8 4 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 16,01 0 17,46 2 15,66 1 16,37 7 isokinetic s % 1 0 9 1 0 3 1 0 6 1 0 6 Mercur y(He ) — V M Quantit yCollecte d u g 359. 0 508. 8 1898. 7 922. 1 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 262. 3 369. 3 1546. 5 726. 0 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 8.43E-0 3 1.26E-0 2 4.60E-0 2 2.23E-0 2 g/se c 1.06E-0 3 1.59E-0 3 5.80E-0 3 2.82E-0 3 Antimon y(Sb ) — Quantit yCollecte d p g 2.1 3 1.3 3 2.0 3 1.8 3 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 1.5 6 0.9 7 1.6 5 1.3 9 Stac k Emissio n Rat e lb/h r 5.00E-0 5 3.29E-0 5 4.92E-0 5 4.40E-0 5 g/se c 6.30E-0 6 4.15E-0 6 6.20E-0 6 5.55E-0 6 Bariu m(Ba ) — Quantit yCollecte d p g 38.3 9 38.3 9 49.3 9 42.0 6 Stae k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 28.0 5 27.8 6 40.2 3 32.0 5 Stac k Emissio n Rat e lb/h r 9.0 1 E-0 4 9.50E-0 4 1.20E-0 3 1.02E-0 3 g/se c 1.14E-0 4 1.20E-0 4 1.5 1 E-0 4 1.28E-0 4 Silve r(Ae ) - Quantit yCollecte d p g < 10.0 0 < 9.3 0 < 8.6 0 < 9.3 0 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 7.3 1 < 6.7 5 < 7.0 0 < 7.0 2 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r < 2.35E-0 4 < 2.30E-0 4 < 2.08E-0 4 < 2.24E-0 4 g/se c < 2.96E-0 5 < 2.90E-0 5 < 2.63E-0 5 < 2.83E-0 5 Thalliu m(Tl ) ~ Quantit yCollecte d p g < 0.5 0 < 0.5 0 < 0.5 0 < 0.5 0 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 0.3 7 < 0.3 6 < 0.4 1 < 0.3 8 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r < 1.17E-0 5 < 1.24E-0 5 < 1.2 1 E-0 5 < 1.2 1 E-0 5 g/se c < 1.48E-06

. < 1.56E-0 6 < 1.53E-0 6 < 1.52E-0 6

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workAAu g 0 2 testing\Field\ U (continued ) P g 2 o f3

J;\Air_Tox\Projec tFites\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workWi g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-1 9 November , 200 2

# ENSR.

Tabl e 2-1 2 (Continued ) Summar yo fIndividua l Metal s Emission s fo rUnit4 Ru n No

. Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Dat e 20-Aug-0 2 20-Aug-0 2 21-Aug-0 2 StartTim e Unit s 09:3 5 14:1 0 11:4 3 Sto p Tim e 12:0 2 16:3 0 14:0 3 AVG S Samplin gParameter s — Barometri cPressur e in

. H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.5 5 29.5 8 Volum e Metere d dc f 95.25 0 100.90 0 91.33 2 95.82 7 Sampl e Volum e dsc f 90.22 0 93.31 4 85.49 0 89.67 5 Moistur e % v/ v 35. 7 30. 7 36. 6 34. 4 0 2a tStac k %dr y 13.5 0 13.7 0 13.9 0 13.7 0 Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. ° F 37 9 38 1 39 2 38 4 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 16,01 0 17,46 2 15,66 1 16,37 7 Isokinetic s % 10 9 10 3 10 6 10 6
Nicke l (Ni ) - QuantityCollecte d u g 29.3 9 29.3 9 39.3 9 32. 7 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 21.4 7 21.3 3 32.0 8 25. 0 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 6.90E-0 4 7,27E-0 4 9.54E-0 4 7.9 1 E-0 4 g/se c 8.69E-0 5 9.17E-0 5 1.20E-0 4 9.96E-0 5

Seleniu m (Se ) — QuantityCollecte d u g 1.5 0 1.2 0 < 1.0 0 < 1.2 3 Stac k Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 1.1 0 0.8 7 < 0.8 1 < 0.9 3 Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 3.52E-0 5 2.97E-0 5 < 2.42E-0 5 < 2.97E-0 5 g/se c 4.44E-0 6 3.74E-0 6 < 3.05E-0 6 < 3.74E-0 6
J:\Air_Tox\Proje d Files\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Field\Uni t4\[m2 9 Unit4.recal..xls]DAT AP g 3 o f3

J:\Air_Jox\Projec tFi1es\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.dcx : 2-2 0 November , 200 2

# ENSR. WUJ.-mUMfMM
Tabl e 2-1 3 PM/HCI/CI 2 Emissio n Results fo rUnit3 Conditio n 1

R u n No

. R u n 1 R u n 2 Dat e 22-Aug-0 2 22-Aug-0 2 Star tTim e Unit s 08:0 5 11:5 2 Sto p Tim e 10:1 2 14:1 0 AVG S Samplin gParameter s — Barometri cPressur e i n

. H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.6 0 Volum e Metere d d c f 100.53 5 101.17 4 100.85 5 Volum e o fGa s Collecte d dsc f 92.90 3 92.17 2 92.53 7 Moistur e % v/ v 32. 7 36. 9 34. 8 0 2a tStac k % dr y 13.4 0 12.8 0 13.1 0 C 0 2a tStac k % dr y 4.7 0 4.5 0 4.6 0 Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. ° F 3 5 5 3 5 7 3 5 6 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 6,28 9 5,92 6 6,10 7 Isokinetic s % 9 9 1 0 4 1 0 2
Particulat eEmissio nResult s — Fron tHal fRins e m g 4 . 0 4 . 2 4.10 0 Particulat e Filte r m g 1. 7 1. 6 1.65 0 Tota l Particulat e m g 5.70 0 5.80 0 5.7 5 P M Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 mg/dsc m 3.99 1 3.79 4 3.89 3 Grai n Loadin g gr/dsc f 0.000 9 0.001 0 0.001 0 Grai n Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 gr/dsc f 0.001 7 0.001 7 0.001 7 Grai n Loadin g @ 12 % C0 2 gr/dsc f 0.002 4 0.002 6 0.002 5 Emissio n Rat e Ib /h r 0.05 1 0.04 9 0.05 0 H C I Emissio nResult s — Tota l HC I Detecte d p g 75,00 0 21,00 0 48,00 0 Tota l HC I Concentratio n p p m 18. 7 5.2 9 12. 0 Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 34. 5 9 . 0 21. 8 H C I Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 0.6 7 0.17 9 0.42 5
C I , Emissio nResult s —
Tota l Cl 2Detecte d M 9 14,00 0 3,90 0 8,95 0 Tota l Cl 2Concentratio n p p m 1.8 2 0.5 1 1.1 7 Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 3.3 6 0.8 7 1.4 1 C l 2Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 0.12 5 0.03 3 0.07 9

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Field\Uni t3\[m26 AUni t3 c1,xls]DAT A

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-2 1 November , 200 2

# ENSR.
Tabl e 2-1 4 PM/HCI/CI 2 Emissio n Results fo rUnit3 Conditio n 2

R u n No

. R u n 3 R u n 4 Dat e 22-Aug-0 2 23-Aug-0 2 Star tTim e Unit s 15:4 1 07:5 2 Sto p Tim e 17:4 6 09:5 6 AVG S Samplin gParameter s — Barometri cPressur e i n

. H g 29.6 0 29.4 5 29.5 3 Volum e Metere d d c f 101.82 9 98.15 1 99.99 0 Volum e o fGa s Collecte d dsc f 92.37 8 90.10 1 91.24 0 Moistur e % v/ v 35. 9 37. 0 36. 4 O za tStac k % dr y 13.0 0 13.2 0 13.1 0 C O za tStac k % dr y 4.5 0 4.8 0 4.6 5 Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. ° F 3 7 7 3 8 1 3 7 9 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,91 0 5,67 3 5,79 2 Isokinetic s % 1 0 5 1 0 6 1 0 6
Particulat eEmissio nResult s — Fron tHal fRins e m g 6. 4 4 . 7 5.55 0 Particulat e Filte r m g 2 . 4 2 . 0 2.20 0 Tota l Particulat e m g 8.80 0 6.7 0 7.7 5 P M Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 mg/dsc m 5.88 7 4.7 1 5.30 0 Grai n Loadin g gr/dsc f 0.001 5 0.001 1 0.001 3 Grai n Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 gr/dsc f 0.002 6 0.002 1 0.002 3 Grai n Loadin g @ 12 % C0 2 gr/dsc f 0.003 9 0.002 9 0.003 4 Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 0.07 4 0.05 6 0.06 5 H C I Emissio nResult s — Tota l HC I Detecte d p g 23,00 0 28,00 0 25,50 0 Tota l HC I Concentratio n p p m 5. 8 7.2 2 6 . 5 Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 10. 1 13. 0 11. 5 H C I Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 0.1 9 0.23 3 0.21 4
C I , Emissio nResult s ~ Tota l Cl 2Detecte d M 9 5,20 0 3 6 0 2,78 0 Tota l Cl 2Concentratio n p p m 0.6 8 0.0 5 0!3 6 Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 1.1 9 0.0 9 0.4 3 C l 2Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 0.04 4 0.00 3 0.02 4

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Field\Uni t3\[m26 AUni t3 c2.xls]DAT A

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 workVAu g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-2 2 November

. 200 2

# ENKR . INTERNATIONAL Tabl e 2-1 5 PM/HCI/CI 2 Emissio n Results fo rUni t4

R u n No

. R u n 1 R u n 2 R u n 3 Dat e 20-Aug-0 2 20-Aug-0 2 21-Aug-0 2 Star tTim e Unit s 09:3 5 14:1 0 11:4 3 Sto p Tim e 12:0 2 16:3 0 14:0 3 AVG S Samplin g Parameter s — Barometri cPressur e i n

. H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.5 5 29.6 0 Volum e Metere d d c f 90.31 2 92.93 3 93.43 0 91.62 3 Volum e o fGa s Collecte d dsc f 86.05 5 86.23 4 87.04 4 86.14 4 Moistur e % v/ v 36. 4 36. 3 36. 8 36. 4 O za tStac k % dr y 13.5 0 13.7 0 13.9 0 13.6 0 C 0 2a tStac k % dr y 4.7 0 4.0 0 4.0 0 4.3 5 Avg

. Stac k

Temp

. ° F 3 7 8 3 8 3 3 8 9 3 8 1 Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 15,93 6 16,06 3 16,05 3 16,00 0 Isokinetic s % 1 0 4 1 0 4 1 0 5 1 0 4
Particulat eEmissio nResult s — Fron tHal fRins e m g 27. 1 10. 8 16. 8 18.23 3 Particulat e Filte r m g 24. 7 23. 6 25. 8 24.70 0 Tota l Particulat e m g 51.800 0 34.400 0 42.600 0 42.93 3 P M Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 mg/dsc m 39.679 5 27.016 8 34.079 1 33.59 2 Grai n Loadin g gr/dsc f 0.009 3 0.006 1 0.007 5 0.00 8 Grai n Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 gr/dsc f 0.017 3 0.011 8 0.014 3 0.01 4 Grai n Loadin g @ 12 % C0 2 gr/dsc f 0.023 7 0.018 4 0.022 6 0.02 2 Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 1.266 2 0.845 8 1.037 1 1.05 0 H C I Emissio nResult s — Tota l HC I Detecte d M S 93,00 0 57,00 0 87,00 0 7900 0 Tota l HC I Concentratio n p p m 25. 1 15.3 5 23.2 1 21.21 7 Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 46. 8 29. 4 45. 8 40.68 0 H C I Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 2.2 8 1.40 4 2.12 2 1.93 5
C I , Emissio nResult s — Tota l Cl 2Detecte d M 9 13,00 0 9,10 0 11,00 0 1103 3 Tota l Cl 2Concentratio n p p m 1.8 3 1.2 8 1.5 3 1.54 6 Cone

. @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 3.4 1 2.4 5 3.0 2 2.96 1 C l 2Emissio n Rat e Ib/h r 0.31 8 0.22 4 0.26 8 0.27 0

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 lesling\Fieid\Uni l 4\lm26 AUni t4.xlslDAT A

J:\Air_ToxVProjec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 2-2 3 November , 200 2

# ENSR. INTERNATIONAL 

### 3.0 SAMPLIN G AN D ANALYTICA L PROCEDURE S

3. 1 Samplin g Procedure s Severa l differen tsamplin g an d monitorin g technique s wer e use d t o provid e the require d dat at o mee t the goal s o fthi s tes tprogram . Tw o (2 ) run s eac h wer e conducte d o n Unit3 attw o separat e operatin g condition s establishe d b yOnyx

. Thre e (3 ) run s wer e conducte d o n Uni t4 a tcondition s establishe d b y Onyx

. Th e samplin g activitie s describe d belo wwer e conducte d durin g al l runs . Al l fiel d activitie s wer e documente d i n accordanc e with EP Aaccepte d procedure s an d copie s o fal l fiel d note s an d dat a sheet s ar e include d i n Appendi xAo fthi s report
. 3.1. 1 Velocity , Moisture an d Fixe d Ga s Determination s Ga s strea m velocit yan d temperatur e wer e determine d i n conjunctio n with eac h manua l samplin g method

. Atyp e "S " pito ttub e connecte d t o a n incline d wate rmanomete rwa s use d t o determin e velocit yhea d o fthe flu e ga s ateac h duc ttravers e poin ta s specifie d i n EP AReferenc e Metho d 2

. Th e temperatur e profil e o fth e flu e ga s ateac h duc ttravers e poin twa s obtaine d b ytakin g reading s with a thermocoupl e an d pyromete rconcurren twit h the velocit yhea d measurements
. Moistur e conten twa s determine d a s specifie d i n EP AMetho d 4

. Velocit yan d temperatur e measuremen tprofile s wer e establishe d prio rt o testin g t o ai d i n sampl e trai n set-up
. Sample s fo rthe determinatio n O fth e fixe d ga s compositio n wer e collecte d usin g the integrate d ba g techniqu e detaile d i n EP AReferenc e Metho d 3

. 3.1. 2 PCDD/PCD FSamplin g Samplin g fo rdioxin s an d furan s wa s complete d i n accordanc e wit h EP AMetho d 2 3 (4 0 CF R 60 , Appendi xA)

. O n Uni t#4 , eac h samplin g ru n wa s 3 hour s i n duratio n coverin g 1 2 samplin g point s at 1 5 minute s pe rpoint

. O n Unit#3 , eac h samplin g ru n wa s 3 hour s i n duratio n coverin g 1 2 samplin g point s at1 5 minute s pe rpoint

. 3.1. 3 Metal s Samplin g Th e EP AMultipl e Metal s Trai n (EP AMetho d 2 9 a s specifie d i n 4 0 CF R 6 0 Appendi xA ) wa s utilize d durin g th e testin g progra m fo rth e collectio n o fth e followin g metals : antimony , arsenic , barium , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , lead , mercury , nickel , selenium , silve ran d thallium

. Eac h ru n wa s 2-h r i n duratio n coverin g 1 2 samplin g point s at1 0 minute s pe rpoint

. 3.1. 4 PM/HCI/CI 2Samplin g Procedur e Samplin g fo rparticulat e matte r(PM) , hydroge n chlorid e (HCI) , Chlorin e (Cl 2 ) wa s performe d i n accordanc e wit h EP AMetho d 005 0 (SW-846 , Tes tMethod s fo rEvaluatin g Soli d Waste , Volum e II , Tes tMethods)

. Thi s procedur e allow s fo rth e collectio n o fHC I i n 0. 1 N H 2 S 0 4impinge rsolution s (1 s t

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\ReporfiOny x3" 1 Reporr2.do c November , 200 2tw o impingers ) an d Cl 2i n the fina l tw o impinger s containin g 0. 1 N NaOH

. Eac h ru n wa s 2-h ri n

duratio n coverin g 1 2 samplin g point s a t1 0 minute s pe rpoint

. 3.2 Analytica l Procedure s 3.2. 1 PCDD/PCD FAnalyse s Metho d 002 3 sample s wer e analyze d b yEP AMetho d 829 0 (hig h resolutio n GC/MS)

. Th e trai n fraction s recovere d fo ranalysi s o fPCDDs/PCDF s includ e th e fron thal frinses , the particulate filte ran d the XA D resi n trap
. Th e analytica l result s fo reac h sampl e fractio n wer e combine d int o asingl e analytica l resul tfo reac h run . PCDD/PCD Fanalyse s wer e performe d b yAlt aAnalytica l Laboratory , Inc

. i n E l Dorad o Hills , CA

. 3.2. 2 Metal s Analyse s Metal s analyse s fo rth e wast e fee d sample s wer e complete d usin g tw o separat e procedures

. First , sample s wer e prepare d an d analyze d fo rantimony , arsenic , barium , beryllium , cadmium , chromium , lead , nickel , selenium , silve ran d thalliu m a s specifie d i n EP AMetho d 602 0 (ICP-MS) , SW846 , 3 r d Edition

. Mercur ywa s analyze d vi amethod 7471 Aan d Seleniu m wa s analyze d b yGraphit e Fumace/Atomi cAbsorptio n Spectrophotometer

. Metal s analyse s wer e performe d b yPS C Analytica l o f Burlington , Ontari o (Canada)

.

3.2. 3 PM/HCI/CI 2Analysi s Sampl e analysi s fo rparticulat e matte r(PM) , hydroge n chlorid e (HCI) , an d Chlorin e (Cl 2 ) wer e conducte d i n accordanc e wit h EP AMetho d 0050 , wit h gravimetri canalysi s fo rparticulat e a s pe rEP A Metho d 5 (4 0 CF R 60,Appendi xA)

. Analysi s fo rHC I an d Cl 2followe d EP AMetho d 9057

. Thi s analyse s wa s als o performe d b yPS C Analytica l Service s o fBurlington , Ontari o (Canada)

.

J:\Air__Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 wor1t\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 3- 2 November , 200 2

# ENSR . INTERNATIONAL 

### 4. 0 QUALIT YASSURANC E

4. 1 Introductio n Thi s sectio n present s th e result s ofal l QA/Q C measure s implemente d durin g th e fiel d samplin g progra m an d al l phase s o fsubsequen tanalysis

. Dat agenerate d fo rth e progra m ar e judge d t o b e vali d a s overal l accurac yan d precisio n result s ar e consisten twit h genera l objectives

. Analytica l QA/Q C dat aar e presente d t o supportai l sampl e result s use d fo rdeterminin g complianc e with performanc e criteri ao remissio n standards

. 4. 2 Stac k

Samplin g QA/Q C Th e stac k

samplin g progra m incorporate d avariet yo fmeasure s t o ensur e tha tsoun d dat awoul d b e obtained

. Al l sample s wer e collecte d atthe stac k samplin g location s a s planne d an d i n accordanc e wit h applicabl e metho d procedures

. On e fiel d blan k fo reac h incinerato rwa s als o submitte d fo r analysi s alon g with progra m samples

. Samplin g QA/Q C measur e fo rthi s progra m include d calibratio n o fal l applicabl e samplin g equipmen t use d a s describe d below

. Fiel d equipmen twer e calibrate d accordin g t o EP Aprocedure s specifie d i n EPA-600/4-77-027 b (Augus t1977 ) an d 4 0 CF R 60 , Method s 1-5 , a s wel l a s manufacturer' s specifications

. 1 ) Dr yGa s Meter s an d Orific e Meters (EP AMetho d 5 Type) Th e dr yga s meter s fo ral l samplin g train s wer e calibrate d agains tawe ttes tmete rwhic h ha d bee n calibrate d agains taspirometer

. Th e orific e meter s wer e calibrate d agains tth e we ttes tmete ran d checke d agains tth e dryga s mete rt o whic h the ywer e attached

. Mete rboxe s ar e calibrate d annuall yan d the n verifie d b yus e o fth e alternativ e Metho d 5 post-tes tcalibratio n procedure

. Thi s procedur e i s base d o n th e principle s ofth e optiona l pretes torific e mete rcoefficien tchec k outline d i n Sectio n 4.4. 1 o fMetho d 5

. Th e averag e Y-valu e obtaine d b ythi s metho d mus tb e withi n 5 % o fth e initia l Y-value

. Th e calculation s provide d wit h th e dat asheet s i n Appendi xAsho wthatthi s criterio n wa s me tfo ral l isokineti csamplin g train s use d o n th e progra m excep tBo x# 80999

. Consequently , apos t calibratio n wa s performe d o n Bo x# 80999

. Th e resultan tDG M calibratio n facto ran d Delt aH wer e entere d i n th e isokineti cspreadsheet

. Sinc e the sampl e volum e wa s les s usin g th e recalibratio n data , thi s valu e wa s utilize d fo remissio n calculation s i n accordanc e wit h the metho d criteria

. 2 ) 2) Samplin g Nozzles

. Eac h glas s nozzl e i s calibrate d wit h amicromete rpriort o testin g an d identifie d with auniqu e identificatio n number

. Th e interna l diamete rofeac h nozzl e i s measure d t o 0.00 1 inche s alon g thre e point s o fth e circumferenc e with adia l vernie rcalipe ran d th e thre e measurement s ar e the n averaged

. 3 ) Balance . Th e analytica l balanc e use d i n th e fiel d t o determin e initia l an d fina l silic age l weight s i s calibrate d agains tClas s M weight s provide d b yth e Mettle rCorporation

.

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tRles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 tesling\Report\Ony x4- 1 November , 200 2 Report2.do c

# ENSR . mre/!A/Ar/oi/Ai.
4 ) Thermocouples

. Typ e Kthermocouple s i n eac h mete rcontro l box , heate d sampl e box , impinge r umbilica l connecto ran d sampl e probe s ar e calibrate d agains tAST M mercury-in-glas s thermometer s atthre e points: a n ic e bath , ambien ttemperatur e an d aboilin g wate rbath

. Calibratio n dat aar e provide d i n Appendi xC

. 5 ) Pito tTube

. Eac h S-typ e stainles s stee l pito ttub e use d i s designe d t o mee tgeometri c configuration s a s define d i n EP AMetho d 2

. Dat asheet s ar e provide d i n Appendi xC

. 4. 3 Chain -of -Custod y Chain-of-custod yprocedure s wer e followe d fo ral l sample s a s follows :

•Eac h isokineti ctrai n wa s set-u p an d recovere d i n aclea n are aadjacen tt o th e incinerators

. •Sample s wer e collected , seale d an d labele d appropriately

. •Al l sample s wer e packe d i n bubbl e wra p o rothe rabsorben tmateria l an d place d i n eithe r sampl e cooler s o rappropriat e DO Tshippin g package s (dangerou s good s items)

. •Al l sample s wer e subsequentl yshippe d vi aPriorit yOvernigh tFe d E xservic e t o th e designate d laboratory

. 4. 4 Analytica l QA/Q C Dat aQualit yIndicators (DQI's ) wer e utilize d throughou tthe progra m t o asses s the validit yo fanalytica l data

. Thi s sectio n provide s arevie wofthes e indicator s an d th e subsequen timpac to n the analytica l data

. 4.4. 1 Analysi s fo rMetal s Evaluatio n o fth e validit yo fmetal s dat aresultin g fro m th e analysi s o fth e Metho d 006 0 samplin g trai n sample s wa s base d o n th e followin g two set s o fDQI's :

•Recoverie s o fintemal , pre-spik e an d alternat e recover ystandard s adde d t o the sample s prio r t o sampling

. Recoverie s o fthes e standard s ar e include d wit h othe rPhili p Analytica l Service s dat ai n Appendi xD

.

•Result s ofanalyse s o ffiel d an d metho d blan k sample s fo rmetals

. Thes e result s ar e include d i n Appendi xD

. O n th e basi s o fthes e Q C results , n o sampl e analyse s wer e rejecte d an d al l th e dat awer e determine d t o b e valid

. Completenes s wa s therefor e determine d t o b e 100 % fo ral l metal s result s fro m al l samples

. Dat aqualit yindicator s (DQIs ) wer e utilize d throughou tthe progra m t o asses s th e validit yofthe analytica l data

. Thi s sectio n provide s arevie wo fthes e indicator s an d th e subsequen timpac to n th e analytica l data

.

J:\Air_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 testing\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 4- 2 November , 200 24.4. 2 Analysi s fo rPCDDs/PCDF s

Evaluatio n o fthe validit yo fth e PCDD/PCD Fdat aresultan tfro m th e analysi s o fth e Metho d 2 3 samplin g trai n sample s wa s base d o n fou rset s o fDQIs

. Thes e were :

aRecoverie s ofinternal , pre-spik e an d alternat e recoverystandard s adde d t o the sample s prio rt o sampling

.
« Result s o fanalysi s o fLaborator yContro l Sample s (LCS ) fo rth e 1 7 PCDD/PCD Fisomer s liste d i n EP AMetho d 23

. Result s o fanalyse s o ffiel d an d metho d blan k sample s fo rPCDD/PCDFs

. Thes e result s ar e include d wit h th e Alt aAnalytica l Dat aRepor tinclude d i n Appendi xD

. Base d o n thes e Q C results , recoverie s o ftw o nativ e analyte s (2,3,6,7,8-HxCD F an d 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ) wer e outsid e o fAlta' s limi ti n th e Ongoin g Precisio n an d Recover y(OPR ) sample

. Thes e limit s ar e recommende d only , an d ar e no tdesignate d b yth e method

. N o sampl e analyse s wer e rejected , an d al l dat awer e determine d t o b e valid

.

4.4. 3 Analysi s fo rParticulat e Matte r Evaluatio n o fresults ofgravimetri canalysi s o fMetho d 005 0 sample s wa s base d o n routin e laboratory practice s an d processin g o fla b blan k an d fiel d blan k

samples

. Minima l particulat e contaminatio n wa s observe d i n bot h th e la b aceton e blan k an d th e fiel d aceton e blan k sampie , an d thu s blan k correctio n u p t o th e maximu m allowe d b ytti e metho d (0.0 1 mg/g ) wa s performed

. Th e blan k filte rweigh twa s withi n acceptabl e tolerance s an d require d n o blan k correction

. Additiona l Q C measure s followe d b y the gravimetri clab , suc h a s maintenanc e o fprope rambien tcondition s an d us e o fstandar d weights , ensure d vali d data

. 4.4. 4 Analysi s fo rHCI/CI 2 Evaluatio n o fthe validit yo fanalysi s o fMetho d 005 0 trai n sample s wa s base d o n thre e set s o f objectives

. Thes e were :

•Result s o fanalysi s o fblan k spike s an d matri xspik e samples

.

•Result s fro m the duplicat e analysi s o fal l samples

.

•Result s o fanalysi s o ffiel d blan k samples

. A n accurac ygoa l o f±10 % i s generall yestablishe d fo rchloride s i n stac k sampl e analyse s conducte d fo rthi s typ e o fprogram . Recoverie s fo ral l blan k spike s me tthes e criteria

. Also , fiel d an d metho d blan k sample s wer e fre e o fcontaminatio n a s show n i n th e table

. N o sampl e analyse s wer e rejected , an d al l result s wer e detennine d t o b e valid

. Completenes s wa s therefor e determine d t o b e 100 % fo r al l result s fro m th e Metho d 005 0 train s fo rchlorid e analysis

.

J:\Atr_Tox\Projec tFiles\Onyx\Ony x200 2 work\Au g 0 2 Iesttng\Report\Ony x Report2.do c 4- 3 November , 200 2APPENDI XA FIEL D DAT ASHEET S



### \

# ENSR . INTERNATIONAL

APPENDI XB PROCES S FEE D AN D OPERATIN G CONDITION S

J:\Air_Tox\Prajec l Files\Onyx\Ony x200 2 \rork\Ma y2002Wa y200 2 ReporftAppendi xCovere.do c Novembe r200 2

### UNI T3 TES TCONDITION S Wee k o fAugus t19 , 200 2
Chlorine
- Ibs/h r Dru m Solid s - Ibs/h r Hig h Bt u liquid s - Ibs/h r Lo wBt u liquid s - Ibs/h r Lea d i n dru m solid s - Ibs/h r Chromiu m i n lo wBt u liquid s - Ibs/h r Mercur yi n dru m solid s - Ibs/hr

. 200-25 0 75 0 (25lbs/charqe ) 70 0 100 0 3 0 1 5 Rat e T o B e Determine d SD AInle tTemperatur e - 0

### F Ru n 1 an d Ru n 2 Ru n 3 an d Ru n 4 Lowe rChambe rTemperatur e - 0

### F Uppe rChambe rTemperatur e - 0

### F Tw o Conditions , Tw o Run s pe rConditio n 39 0 42 5 175 0 190 0

### UNI T4 TES TCONDITION S Wee k o fAugus t19 , 2002
Chlorin e - Ibs/h r Dru m Solid s - Ibs/h r Bul k Solids-Ibs/h r Hig h Bt u Liquid s i n SC C - Ibs/h r Hig h BT U Liquid s i n Kil n - Ibs/h r Lo wBt u liquid s - Ibs/h r Lea d i n dru m solid s - Ibs/h r Chromiu m i n lo wBt u liquid s - Ibs/h r Mercur yi n Dru m Solid s - Ibs/h r Powdere d Activate d Carbo n Ru n 1 - Ibs/h r Ru n 2 - Ibs/h r Ru n 3 - Ibs/h r SD AInle tTemperatur e - 0

### F S D AOutle tTemperatur e - ° F Kil n Temperatur e - 0

### F S C C Temperatur e - ° F Uni twil l b e conditione d b yfeedin g a startin g o n Augus t1 , 2002

. 25 0 (al l i n liquids ) 150 0 (2 5 lbs/charge ) 500 0 80 0 40 0 75 0 3 0 1 5 P J

. 2 0 1 5 6 75 0 42 5 185 0 195 0 l y2 0 lbs

. o fcarbo n i n th e syste mAPPENDI XC FIEL D EQUIPMEN TCALIBRATIO N FORM S

J:\Air_Tox\Proje d Files\Onyx\Ony x200 2 worXWu g 0 2 testing\Report\Appendi xCovere.do c Augus t200 2INTERNATIONAL

X APPENDI XD

ANALYTICA L DAT AREPORT S

J:\Air_Tox\Proje d Files\Onyx\Ony x200 2 wonVAug 0

2 testing\Report\AppendixCovers.doc Augus t200 2