Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices 26603 

1AREVA was previously known as Compagnie 

Generale des Matieres Nucleaires (‘‘COGEMA’’). 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Cash–Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of PRCBs from 

Malaysia entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash–deposit rate for Euro Plastics will 

be the rate established in the final 

results of review; (2) for previously 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash–deposit rate will continue to be 

the company–specific rate published in 

the Notice of Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

Malaysia, 69 FR 34128, 34129 (June 18, 

2004); (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review or the less–thanfair–value investigation but the 

manufacturer is, the cash–deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer has its 

own rate, the cash–deposit rate will be 

84.94 percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate for 

this proceeding. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importer 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

These preliminary results of 

administrative review are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: May 3, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9036 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–427–819] 

Final Results of Expedited Sunset 

Review: Countervailing Duty Order on 

Low Enriched Uranium from France 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On January 3, 2007, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated a sunset review 

of the countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) 

order on low enriched uranium (‘‘LEU’’) 

from France, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of a notice of 

intent to participate and an adequate 

substantive response filed on behalf of 

a domestic interested party and 

inadequate response from respondent 

interested parties (in this case, no 

response), the Department determined 

to conduct an expedited sunset review 

of this CVD order pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B). As a result of this 

sunset review, the Department finds that 

revocation of the CVD order would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 10, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristen Johnson or Brandon Farlander, 

AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4793 or (202) 482–

0182, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 3, 2007, the Department 

initiated a sunset review of the CVD 

order on LEU from France pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation 

of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 72 FR 

100 (January 3, 2007). On January 16, 

2007, the Department received a notice 

of appearance on behalf of Eurodif S.A., 

a French producer of LEU, and its 

affiliated companies, including AREVA, 

an owner of Eurodif, and AREVA NC 

and AREVA NC, Inc., (collectively, 

‘‘Eurodif/AREVA’’).1 Eurodif/AREVA is 

an interested party under section 

771(9)(A) of the Act. On January 18, 

2007, the Department received a notice 

of intent to participate on behalf of 

USEC Inc. and its subsidiary, United 

States Enrichment Corporation 

(collectively, ‘‘USEC’’), a domestic 

interested party. USEC, a domestic 

producer of LEU, is an interested party 

under section 771(9)(C) of the Act. 

On February 2, 2007, the Department 

received a complete substantive 

response from USEC within the 30-day 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). However, the 

Department did not receive a 

substantive response from any 

government or respondent interested 

party to this proceeding. As a result, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), 

the Department conducted an expedited 

sunset review of this CVD order. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this order is 

all LEU. LEU is enriched uranium 

hexafluoride (UF6) with a U235 product 

assay of less than 20 percent that has 

not been converted into another 

chemical form, such as UO2, or 

fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, 

regardless of the means by which the 

LEU is produced (including LEU 

produced through the down–blending of 

highly enriched uranium). 

Certain merchandise is outside the 

scope of this order. Specifically, this 

order does not cover enriched uranium 

hexafluoride with a U235 assay of 20 

percent or greater, also known as highly 

enriched uranium. In addition, 

fabricated LEU is not covered by the 

scope of this order. For purposes of this 

order, fabricated uranium is defined as 

enriched uranium dioxide (UO2), 

whether or not contained in nuclear fuel 

rods or assemblies. Natural uranium 

concentrates (U3O8) with a U235

concentration of no greater than 0.711 

percent and natural uranium 

concentrates converted into uranium 

hexafluoride with a U235 concentration 

of no greater than 0.711 percent are not 

covered by the scope of this order. 

Also excluded from this order is LEU 

owned by a foreign utility end–user and 

imported into the United States by or for 

such end–user solely for purposes of 

conversion by a U.S. fabricator into 

uranium dioxide (UO2) and/or 

fabrication into fuel assemblies so long 

as the uranium dioxide and/or fuel 

assemblies deemed to incorporate such 

imported LEU (i) remain in the 

possession and control of the U.S. 

fabricator, the foreign end–user, or their 

designated transporter(s) while in U.S. 

customs territory, and (ii) are re–

exported within eighteen (18) months of 

entry of the LEU for consumption by the 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
26604 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices 

end–user in a nuclear reactor outside 

the United States. Such entries must be 

accompanied by the certifications of the 

importer and end user. 

The merchandise subject to this order 

is currently classifiable in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at subheading 

2844.20.0020. Subject merchandise may 

also enter under 2844.20.0030, 

2844.20.0050, and 2844.40.00. Although 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the written description of the 

merchandise is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (‘‘Decision 

Memorandum’’) from Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, to David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated May 2, 2007, 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in this review and 

the corresponding recommendation in 

this public memorandum which is on 

file in the Central Records Unit room 

B–099 of the main Commerce building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Web at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review 

The Department determines that 

revocation of the CVD order would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

at the rates listed below: 

Producers/Exporters Net Countervailable 

Subsidy (percent) 

Eurodif S.A. and 

AREVA NC ................ 12.15 ad valorem 

All Others ...................... 12.15 ad valorem 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice are in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) 

of the Act. 

Dated: May 2, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9037 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XA11 

Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of 

Mexico, and South Atlantic; South 

Atlantic Exempted Fishing Permit 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of receipt of an 

application for an exempted fishing 

permit; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: NMFS announces the receipt 

of an application for an exempted 

fishing permit (EFP) from Rachel 

Kalisperis on behalf of the South 

Carolina Aquarium. If granted, the EFP 

would authorize the applicant, with 

certain conditions, to collect limited 

numbers of groupers (not including 

goliath grouper), snappers, tilefishes, 

sea basses, jacks, spadefish, grunts, 

porgies, mackerel, cero, cobia, dolphin 

fish, spiny lobster, little tunny, 

triggerfishes, golden crab, hogfish, 

porkfish, puddingwife, red drum, scup, 

sheepshead, shrimp, wahoo, and 

wreckfish. Specimens would be 

collected from Federal waters off the 

coast of South Carolina from 2007 to 

2012 and displayed at the South 

Carolina Aquarium, located in 

Charleston, South Carolina. 

DATES: Comments must be received no 

later than 5 p.m., eastern standard time, 

on May 25, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Comments on the 

application may be sent via fax to 727–

824–5308 or mailed to: Julie Weeder, 

Southeast Regional Office, NMFS, 263 

13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 

33701. Comments may also be 

submitted by e-mail. The mailbox 

address for providing e-mail comments 

is SouthCarolina.Aquarium@noaa.gov. 

Include in the subject line of the e-mail 

document the following text: Comment 

on South Carolina Aquarium EFP 

Application. The application and 

related documents are available for 

review upon written request to the 

address above or the e-mail address 

below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie 

Weeder, 727–551–5753; fax 727–824–

5308; e-mail: Julie.Weeder@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EFP is 

requested under the authority of the 

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act (16 

U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), and regulations at 

50 CFR 600.745(b) concerning exempted 

fishing. 

According to the applicant, the South 

Carolina Aquarium is a public, nonprofit institution located in Charleston, 

South Carolina. Its mission is to provide 

entertainment and education and to 

support conservation through aquatic 

exhibits displaying animals from South 

Carolina. 

The proposed collection for public 

display involves activities otherwise 

prohibited by regulations implementing 

the Fishery Management Plans (FMPs) 

for the Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the 

South Atlantic Region, Shrimp Fishery 

of the South Atlantic Region, Spiny 

Lobster Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico 

and South Atlantic, Dolphin and Wahoo 

Fishery off the Atlantic States, and 

Coastal Migratory Pelagics Resources. 

The applicant requires authorization 

to harvest and possess up to the 

following numbers of fishes during each 

12-month period from June 20, 2007, to 

June 19, 2012: 50 Atlantic spadefish, 15 

blueline tilefish, 12 cero, 6 cobia, 50 

dolphin fish, 5 golden crab, 15 golden 

tilefish, 40 groupers of the genus 

Epinephelus (not including goliath 

grouper), 50 groupers of the genus 

Mycteroperca, 150 grunts, 6 hogfish, 100 

jacks of the genus Caranx, 50 jacks of 

the genus Seriola, 15 king mackerel, 25 

little tunny, 3 ocean triggerfish, 65 

porgies, 15 porkfish, 2 puddingwife, 2 

queen snapper, 12 red drum, 25 red 

porgy, 13 sand tilefish, 40 scup, 40 sea 

basses, 15 sheepshead, 375 shrimp, 75 

snappers, 15 Spanish mackerel, 25 

spiny lobster, 12 triggerfishes, 50 

vermilion snapper, 5 wahoo, 10 

wreckfish, and 15 yellowtail snapper. 

Specimens would be collected from 

Federal waters off the coast of South 

Carolina from June 20, 2007, to June 19, 

2012. 

Fishes would be captured in some 

areas using hand nets in conjunction 

with scuba, dip nets deployed from a 

boat, hook and line, black sea bass pots, 

spiny lobster traps, golden crab traps, 

‘‘bait fish’’ traps, ‘‘habitat’’ traps, and 

‘‘octopus’’ traps. Black sea bass pots, 

spiny lobster traps, and golden crab 

traps will meet the construction 

requirements of 50 CFR 622.40. ‘‘Bait 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES