alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 9,284.

#### MATTHEW v. RAE et al.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 699.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1829.

Aliens — Naturalization — Act of Congress— State Laws — Right to Hold Land.

1. An alien could not become a citizen of the United States, or of either of the states, in the year 1793, by taking the oaths, and otherwise complying with the requisitions of the naturalization laws of any one of the states.

2. An alien, as such, has a right, under the 6th section of the Maryland act of December 19, 1791, “concerning the territory of Columbia,” &c. to purchase and hold lands in the county of Washington. D. C., and transmit the same to his alien heirs.

[This was an action by Matthew’s lessee against Rae, Hayman and Lipsieum.]

Ejectment for lots in Georgetown, D. C. The plaintiff’s lessors were aliens and claimed as heirs at law of James Redman, who was born in England, came to this country in 1793. and went through the forms of naturalization prescribed by the laws of Pennsylvania, passed in 17S9, and by the *1113law of Maryland, passed in 1779. Congress -had passed a general naturalization law in the year 1790 [1 Stat 103].

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent)

was of opinion that Redman was not naturalized; the state naturalization laws being superseded, and annulled by the act of congress, whose jurisdiction upon that subject is, under the constitution of the United States, exclusive (Chirac v. Chirac, 2 Wheat [15 U. S.) 261), and that, according to the case of Spratt v. Spratt, 1 Pet. [26 U. S.] 343, the plaintiffs, although aliens, were entitled to recover.
EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Paul Bailey, the chief financial officer of the Company, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Iroquois Gas
Transmission System, L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

DATE: May 14, 2004



/S/ PAUL BAILEY
_________________________________________
PAUL BAILEY
VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William C. Robinson, CEO, Chairman and Principal Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                            CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.

                                            By: /s/ William C. Robinson
                                                -----------------------------
                                                William C. Robinson
                                                CEO, President, Chairman and
                                                Principal Executive Officer

                                                November 20, 2006
Case No. 10,006.

#### NALLY v. LAMBELL.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 365.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1806.

Witness — Attachment for Fees — Demand in Name of Witness.

■The court will not grant an attachment against a party for not paying his witness, unless payment shall have been demanded by a person having authority to receive payment, and unless that authority appear.

Motion for attachment by witness against the person at whose request he was summoned. Affidavit by Spaulding, that he was requested by Nally to demand, and .that he did demand payment, which was refused.

THE COURT

(PITZHUGH, Circuit Judge, absent,)

refused the attachment,, because Spaulding’s authority did not appear,
Order filed July 31, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00295-CV

____________

SHAVONNE LEON, Appellant

V.

HOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1040205

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due July 14, 2014. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before August 15, 2014, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Retirement Function

RETIREMENT FUNCTION OF CENTRAL A/C AND HEAT PUMPS

Fraction of Original Shipment of Each Age Group

Year after purchase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 

 Fraction Retired 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.012 0.019 0.026 0.033 0.039 0.043 0.046 0.049 0.051 0.053 0.056 0.060 0.067 0.078 0.093 0.116 0.146 0.000  Fraction Surviving 1.000 0.998 0.996 0.994 0.992 0.990 0.988 0.987 0.976 0.956 0.930 0.897 0.858 0.815 0.769 0.720 0.669 0.616 0.560 0.500 0.433 0.355 0.262 0.146 0.000 

 Break Down Function 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.012 0.020 0.028 0.035 0.043 0.050 0.057 0.064 0.071 0.079 0.091 0.107 0.134 0.179 0.263 0.442 1.000 1.000 Fraction with Problem 0.023 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.027 0.029 0.031 0.033 0.035 0.038 0.033 0.039 0.044 0.048 0.105 0.155 0.221 0.067 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 

Fraction Problem Free 0.977 0.953 0.928 0.902 0.875 0.846 0.816 0.783 0.748 0.710 0.677 0.638 0.595 0.547 0.442 0.288 0.067 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Problem Function 0.023 0.025 0.026 0.028 0.030 0.033 0.036 0.040 0.045 0.051 0.046 0.057 0.068 0.081 0.191 0.350 0.766 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 

Fraction of Original Shipment Retiring

0.000.020.040.060.080.100.120.140.16

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Age of AC Product
#### Stone & Downer Co. *v.*United States

No. 6815.

Entry No. 518, etc.

-Invoices dated London, England, July 21, 1942, etc.

Certified July 24, 1942, etc.

Entered at Boston, Mass., August 12, 1942, etc.

(Decided January 28, 1947)

*Joseph F. Lockett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1473 

To amend Public Law 99–548 to provide for the implementation of the 

multispecies habitat conservation plan for the Virgin River, Nevada, 

and to extend the authority to purchase certain parcels of public land. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2011 

Mr. HELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 99–548 to provide for the implementation of the multispecies habitat conservation plan for 

the Virgin River, Nevada, and to extend the authority 

to purchase certain parcels of public land. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mesquite Land Con5 veyances Act of 2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1473 IS

1 SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE VIRGIN RIVER MULTI2 SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN. 

3 Section 3(d)(3)(B) of Public Law 99–548 (100 Stat. 

4 3061, 116 Stat. 2018) is amended by inserting ‘‘and im5 plementation’’ after ‘‘development’’. 

6 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF PURCHASE AUTHORITY AND WITH7 DRAWALS. 

8 Section 3 of Public Law 99–548 (100 Stat. 3061, 

9 113 Stat. 1501A–166) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (e)— 

11 (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ‘‘For 

12 a period of 12 years after the date of the enact13 ment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘Until Novem14 ber 29, 2021’’; 

15 (B) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘Not 

16 later than 10 years after the date of the enact17 ment of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘Not 

18 later than November 29, 2021’’; and 

19 (C) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘the date 

20 that is 12 years after the date of the enactment 

21 of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘November 

22 29, 2021’’; and 

23 (2) in subsection (f)(3), by striking ‘‘the date 

24 that is 12 years after the date of the enactment of 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1473 IS

1 this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘November 29, 

2 2021’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
(Reap. Dec. 9646)

#### Sears, Roebuck and Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 19823, etc.

(Decided March 24, 1960)

*Lane, Young é Fox*for the plaintiff.

*George Goehr an Lout),*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reappraisement consists of bamboo blinds and sets of hardware accessories imported from Japan; and that each bamboo blind, as invoiced,' is accompanied by 'one set of hardware accessories.

> That on or 'about the dates of exportation of the merchandise hereinbefore described, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, at the appraised unit values; that said unit values include the cost of the sets of hardware accessories, which cost is 3 cents (U.S. Cy) per set of hardware accessories; and that there was no higher foreign value.

> That the above appeals for reappraisment are limited to the merchandise hereinbefore described and are abandoned as to all other merchandise; and that said appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the appraised unit values, which unit values include the *624cost of the sets of hardware accessories, costing 3 cents (United States currency) per set of hardware accessories.

As to all other merchandise, these appeals for reappraisement are dismissed. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**

**906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Kevin L. Baehler, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of School Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned: 

 
 1.The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period from January 1, 2017 to December 30, 2017 (the “Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and 
 
 2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of School Specialty, Inc. 
Date: March 16, 2018 

 

/s/ Kevin L. Baehler
Kevin L. BaehlerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
This certification accompanies this Annual report on Form 10-K/A pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 
**
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# November 2017 New Employees

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land & Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Building 20, Buckeye Room was busting at the seams as 36 new employees attended the November New Employee Orientation.  Deputy Chief of Staff, Mr. Don Schulze, welcomed the “newbies”.  Over the two-day orientation, EEO, Office of Counsel as well as several other organizations at DSCC, gave presentations.  The group enjoyed lunch, which was provided by the AFGE Union and a base tour by Installation Support.  DLA Land and Maritime welcomed the November 2017 new associates during a New Employee Orientation Session held on November 29 and 30.

The December New Employee Orientation has been cancelled due to the holidays.  The next session will be held January of 2018.

 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MNew EmployeeCulture L&M
No. 96-7806.

#### Adkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1645 

To establish an Oleoresin Capsicum Spray Pilot Program in the Bureau 

of Prisons, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 4, 2011 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To establish an Oleoresin Capsicum Spray Pilot Program 

in the Bureau of Prisons, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Correctional 

5 Officer Protective Equipment Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OLEORESIN CAPSICUM SPRAY PILOT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) PILOT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—The Director of 

8 the Federal Bureau of Prisons shall conduct a pilot pro9 gram to determine the effectiveness of the routine issuance 

10 of Oleoresin Capsicum spray to staff. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1645 IS

1 (b) SCOPE OF PILOT PROGRAM.—The Director of the 

2 Federal Bureau of Prisons shall have the discretion to— 

3 (1) select the specific Bureau of Prisons institu4 tions, which shall include high security and adminis5 trative facilities, to participate in the pilot program; 

6 (2) determine the length of the pilot program, 

7 not to exceed 12 months; 

8 (3) select the type of Oleoresin Capsicum spray 

9 device utilized in the pilot program; and 

10 (4) determine which Bureau of Prisons staff 

11 will be authorized to participate in the pilot pro12 gram, which shall include bargaining unit employees 

13 and not only include supervisors and managers. 

14 (c) REQUIREMENTS SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF

15 APPROPRIATIONS.—The requirements of this section are 

16 subject to the availability of appropriations. 

17 (d) GAO REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after 

18 the date on which the pilot program ends, the Comptroller 

19 General of the United States shall submit to Congress an 

20 evaluation of the effects of the pilot program and provide 

21 to Congress any research and analysis that the Comp22 troller General determines appropriate on tools to improve 

23 officer safety in Federal prisons. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1352 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1352

  To amend the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation 
 Equity Act: A Legacy for Users to include freight and passenger rail 
      among eligible uses of funding under the coordinated border 
        infrastructure program and to reauthorize that program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2011

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation 
 Equity Act: A Legacy for Users to include freight and passenger rail 
      among eligible uses of funding under the coordinated border 
        infrastructure program and to reauthorize that program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COORDINATED BORDER INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1303 of the SAFETEA-LU (23 U.S.C. 101 
note; 119 Stat. 1207) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``motor vehicles'' and 
        inserting ``motor vehicles and freight and passenger rail'';
            (2) in subsection (b), in paragraphs (1), (3), (4), and 
        (5), by inserting ``, rail,'' after ``motor vehicle'' each 
        place it appears;
            (3) in subsection (d), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by inserting ``, rail,'' after ``motor vehicle''; and
            (4) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph 
                (6); and
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following:
            ``(5) Rail.--The term `rail' means railroad (as defined in 
        section 10102 of title 49, United States Code).''.
    (b) Reauthorization.--Section 1101(a)(11) of the SAFETEA-LU (119 
Stat. 1155) is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) through (E) and 
inserting the following:
                    ``(A) $230,000,000 for fiscal year 2011; and
                    ``(B) for fiscal year 2012 and each fiscal year 
                thereafter through 2015, the amount for the prior 
                fiscal year increased by the rate of inflation (as 
                measured by the Consumer Price Index for All Urban 
                Consumers (United States city average) published by the 
                Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of 
                Labor).''.
                                 <all>
```