alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: August 8, 2007 /s/ Donald R. Mayer Donald R. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roman SKOCZEN Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-1960.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Sept. 23, 2005.

Julie Peters Pekron, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John A. Meyer, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, MANION, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

After concluding that the district court correctly calculated the range under the Sentencing Guidelines, this court ordered a limited remand so that the district court could inform us whether he considers the sentence he imposed to be appropriate, given that the guidelines are no longer mandatory. See *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005).

The district court has informed us that he would impose the same sentence under the advisory Guidelines. Sentence ranges properly calculated under the Guidelines are presumptively reasonable, see *United States v. Mykytiuk,*415 F.3d 606 (7th Cir.2005), and the defendant has not filed a response and therefore has not rebutted that presumption. Nor does our independent review suggest that the sentence is unreasonable.

The judgment is therefore Affirmed.
#### Abercrombie & Fitch Co. *v.*United States

No. 6517.

Entry No. 739606, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, January 5, 1942, etc.

Certified January 7, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 24, 1942, etc.

(Decided November 15, 1946)

*Lane & Wallace*and *Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve the proper dutiable values of certain merchandise imported from England. The record upon which the said appeals have been submitted for decision establishes that the issues herein and the issues which were involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, are similar in all material respects, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence herein.

Upon the established facts and following the authority cited, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case No. 9,960;

#### MURRAY v. DULANY.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 343.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1828.

Witness — Mulatto—Proof of Freedom.

In assault and battery, . the plaintiff, being a mulatto, cannot, at the trial upon the general issue, be compelled to prove his freedom.

Assault and battery; The plaintiff [George Murray] was a mulatto.;

Mr. Wise, for the defendant [Henry R. Du-lany],

contended that, the plaintiff should prove his freedom.

But

THE COURT

(MORSELL, Circuit Judge, absent)

said, that, the defendant had waived the objection to the "person of the plaintiff by pleading the. general issue. '
#### Alfred Orlik, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6501.

Entry No. 715721, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, September 1945, etc.

Certified September 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., October 18, 1945, etc.

(Decided November 12, 1946)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for, the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the ap--praised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc.
of Nevada;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                                 /s/ Donald R. Mayer
Date: 11-7-05                    ___________________________________________
                                 Donald R. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KYLE J. WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D20-312, 4D20-314, 4D20-315, 4D20-316,

4D20-317, 4D20-318 and 4D20-319

[January 21, 2021]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline C. Shepherd, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

50-2018-CF-012254-AXXX-MB, 50-2018-CF-012309-AXXX-MB, 50-

2019-CF-000169-AXXX-MB, 50-2019-CF-000780-AXXX-MB, 50-2019-

CF-001438-AXXX-MB, 50-2019-CF-001466-AXXX-MB and 50-2019-CF006205-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-442-000]


Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 8, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 3, 2007, Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd. 
(WIC) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 2, Eighth Revised Sheet No. 1, to become effective 
June 4, 2007.
    WIC states that this tariff sheet is being filed to remove two 
contracts from the listing of non-conforming agreements.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ca8c8f988985a4a6a3a4af99bfbabaa5b8be8aacafb8a9e4ada5bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="591f1c0b1a16373530373c0a2c2929362b2d193f3c2b3a773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-9320 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, James A. Rotherham,  C.P.A.,Chief Financial Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certifyin accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on myknowledge:

 

(1)                                  the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as anexhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 

Dated: August 13, 2004

 

 
| /s/ James A. Rotherham, C.P.A. |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| James A. Rotherham, C.P.A.     |
| Chief Financial Officer        |
| (Principal Financial Officer)  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided toKintera and will be retained by Kintera and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0600

The following information is located in the confidential ity files of the Director, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office of Air Quality P lanning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N orth Carolina 27711. This information is confidential pending final determination by t he Administrator and is not available for public inspection.

Memorandum from K. Schaffner, RTI International, to S . Shedd, EPA/OAQPS. Site visit to TPC Group in Houston, Texas on June 22, 2010. Dated August 2010. Draft.

The site visit memorandum contains information about ma rine vessel loading at the TPC Group facility. The confidential material is comprised of 13 pages.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces a meeting of the aforementioned Special Emphasis Panel. 

*Time and Date:*                         12 p.m.-4 p.m., May 24, 2007 (Closed).                     

*Place:*                         Teleconference. Corporate Square, Building 12, Conference Room 3106.                     

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                     

*Matters to be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the review, discussion, and evaluation of research applications received in response to FOA PS07-002, “HIV/AIDS Risk Reduction Intervention for Heterosexually Active African American Men.”                     

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         J. Felix Rogers, PhD, M.P.H., Scientific Review Administrator, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., MS E05, Atlanta, GA 30333, telephone 404.639.6101.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: April 27, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E7-8457 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
(V. D. 68)

#### *Manca,*Inc. E. Leitz, Inc. v. United States

Entry No. 971394, etc.

(Decided February 17, 1958)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from *629classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United, States,*38 Cust. Ct. 508, Abstract 60781, and it has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above remand of protest consists of Microscopes and Wooden Cabinets, containers for said microscopes, which were the subject of a judgment and decision by the First Division of this Court in the case of *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States,*Abstract 60781, on May 22, 1967, wherein it is stated “* * * and remand the matter, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, U. S. C. § 2636 (d), for further proceedings before a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the imported merchandise in the manner provided for by law.”

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States were as follows:

> United States

> Invoice dollars

> Entry No. Merchandise price each Less discount per each

> 959383_ 1 Microscope Metallux RUIIO_ $705. 04 25% $528. 78

> 1 Cabinet_ 21. 00 25% 15. 75

> 1 Microscope BMe_ 305. 76 25% 229. 32

> 1 Cabinet_ 21. 00 25% 15. 75

> WH 2775-10 Microscopes Dialux 46_ 250. 72 25% 188. 04

> 10 Cabinets_ 21. 00 25% 15. 75

> 955171-5 Microscopes HO 20/95_ 85. 96 25% 64. 47

> 5 Cabinets_ 7. 56 25% 5. 67

> WH 10261-12 Polarizing Microscopes IIIM IIVOG. 203. 00 25% 152. 25

> 12 Wooden Cabinets_ 18. 20 25% 13. 65

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above remand of protest may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and I hold such dutiable value for each of the articles to be as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 23 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No. 33-21704, No. 33-24096, No. 33-37300, No. 33-65104, No. 33-56717, No. 333-42903, No. 333-59811, No. 333-61214, No. 333-117850 and No. 333-151399 on Form S-8 andNo. 333-47909 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 2, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of The McClatchy Company, and the effectiveness of The McClatchy Company’s internal control over financial reporting,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The McClatchy Company for the year ended December 27, 2009. 

*/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP*

 

Sacramento, California 

March 2, 2010.
#### SUCCESSION of Roy MELANCON.

No. 98-CC-2832.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re Sattler, Jessica Melancon; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 12231-B; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW98-1445.

Denied.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.
No. 54929.

#### National Distillers Products Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 111255-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Oust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Jonathan B. Hill

+1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

October 14, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act 

and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam:

On June 18, 2015 a request for Section 333 exemption was submitted on behalf of PINC

Aerial (“PINC”), that request was assigned File No. FAA-2015-3238-0001. We have since found

that the email address of the application, Matt Yearling, Chief Executive Officer of PINC, listed 

on page 2 of the submission is incorrect. The correct email address is 

myearling@pincsolutions.com. We request that your records be updated to reflect the correct 

email address.

Sincerely,

Jonathan B. Hill

Cooley, LLP

Counsel for PINC Aerial Productions, Inc.

cc: William Crozier

Robert Pappas

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith

Dan Ngo