alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1521 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1521

To provide assistance for agricultural producers adversely affected by 
   damaging weather and other conditions relating to Hurricane Irene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2011

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide assistance for agricultural producers adversely affected by 
   damaging weather and other conditions relating to Hurricane Irene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGRICULTURAL ASSISTANCE.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Disaster county.--The term ``disaster county'' means--
                    (A) a county included in the geographical area 
                covered by a qualifying natural disaster declaration; 
                and
                    (B) each county contiguous to a county described in 
                subparagraph (A).
            (2) Qualifying natural disaster declaration.--The term 
        ``qualifying natural disaster declaration'' means--
                    (A) a natural disaster declared by the Secretary in 
                2011 due to damaging weather and other conditions 
                relating to Hurricane Irene under section 321(a) of the 
                Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 
                1961(a)); or
                    (B) a major disaster or emergency designated by the 
                President in 2011 due to damaging weather and other 
                conditions relating to Hurricane Irene under the Robert 
                T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 
                Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture.
    (b) Assistance.--Of the funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation, 
the Secretary shall use $10,000,000 to provide assistance to 
agricultural producers in disaster counties through--
            (1) the emergency conservation program established under 
        title IV of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2201 
        et seq.); and
            (2) the emergency watershed protection program established 
        under section 403 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 2203).
                                 <all>
```
January 17, 1941

No. 45243.

#### Protests 962567-G, etc., of N. Minami & Co., Inc.

Abstract 44838. Application by Government denied.
# C_2012217EN.01001302.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 24 May 2012 — Vodafone Omnitel Nv v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni

(Case C-258/12)

2012/C 217/29

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vodafone Omnitel Nv

Applicant:

Defendant: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are the Community provisions in the sector, and in particular the provisions of Directive No 2002/20/EC, (1) to be interpreted as precluding the national rules referred to, in particular Law No 266 of 2005, as those provisions are actually applied by regulation included.

1

---

(1)  Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive); OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21.

1

---
OFFlCEOFTHEA170RNEY QENERALOF- . 

AUSTIN 

Honorable I. R, Yright 

Superintendent 

Texae .Pc.hool for the Dear 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Slrr Opinion No. O-i+082 

Ret Supplementing salaries or employeee or elaemosynar~ inrrtltutions, under the protlslons or Cenate Bill No. l+02, 

hota, Regular Session, 47th 

Legi8latur8. 

The general rider’ appended to Senate Bill 402, 

Aots, Re&ar Seselon, 47th Legiblatura, oontalne a provl- 

.alon reading aa rolloust 

*(a) In these approprlatione the Leglslature has provided a fairly Uniform soale. or 

salaries ror similar seroioes throughout the 

institution8 without, however, dlrrerentlatlng 

ln the amounts to be paid emplofaee reoelvlng, 

end those not receiving room, board and laundry 

l rro m th8 State; and to prevent lnequalltice In 

salaries to those employees not rsoeiving any 

or all of suah perquisites it is provided that 

the Superintendent, upon the writtan approval. 

or the Board or Gontrol may e.djuot suc.h emplopee'a 

eala,rlea out or th8 reepeotlve support and malntenanoe appropriations by not eXO88ding Twelve 

($12.00) Dollars per month eaoh. Wore easily 

to adjust suoh items proper transrere from aupport and maintenanoe to salary approprletions 

may be made annually or more Often." 

Your letter of the 2nd inetant inquires whether, 

und,er this law, you may, with the.i\Atten approval oi' the 

C?tate Board of Control, sUp.@8m8tlt the S-lari8s 0: eJ@Oy88a 

who do oot'reoeive room, board and Laundry, but reoelve one 

or two meals on the oampus. In other words, your qUeStiOn 
Honorable .E. R. Wight, Pag8 2 

Ia whether an employe8.who raoelrerr dome, but not all, of 

the p8rquIeitee Of room, board and laundry, may haV8 his 

salary supplemented under the prwieiona of thla rider, with 

thd WTitt8tt apprOva1 Or the 8tate Board Of.Control~, or u-h&her, 

on the oontrary, o.?ly those employ8es mey have their aalarlss 

supplemsnted who i-SC8iY8 none or the68 p8rquiSit88. 

The perqulsitse wema to are room, board and 

laundry. The employee Nho may, with the approval or the 

Boerd,ar Control, reoelre a salary adjustment within th8 llmltatlona provided by this aot, ere those employeas uho do not 

reoeire any or all of suah perqulolteei Xt seem3 olear 00 

UB thst the Legielature intended to p8rmIt the salaries of 

those- smploydae Who r808iVed nW8, or 188s than ell, Or the 

perquisites mentioned, to be adjueted In aooordano8 with the 

prorielons 0r the ridor. To hold Otherrvia8 would be to attaoh undue eisairloanoe to the we 0r th8 word *any", and to 

1;gnore entirely the uae of the word *all" in that portion OS 

th8 rider reaalngt “ana to'prsvent Inequalities In ealarleo 

to thost employsee not reoelrlng any or all or suoh perquldter. 

. '. . . 

We truet that th8 fOr8gOiW adequately aneWBra your 

qU8btiOQ. 

YO& V8Py truly
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,150,355
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,973,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                   255,592
<INVENTORY>                                 22,220,037
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,278,880
<PP&E>                                       2,550,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                 287,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,279,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,536,158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,190
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,469,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,279,193
<SALES>                                     26,280,926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,280,926
<CGS>                                       15,994,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,337,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (44,915)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (229,476)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,764,609
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,813,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,951,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,951,609
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76


</TABLE>
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Signature: Project No.: 0 317.0 2 .005.52 0 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: 2015 Annual Review

– Preliminary

Category Review OCPSF (PSC 414 ) 

### CBI?

Yes

No TELEPHONE CALL RECOR D

Incoming

Outgoing Date: 05/07 / 20 15 Time: 2:30 am

pm

Company Name: DSM Chemicals NA Inc. ERG Staff Name: Eva Knoth

Contact Name: Elizabeth Connell Contact Phone Number: ( 706 ) 849

- 6395

beth.connell@dsm.com

General Subject: 2013 TRI Nitrate Releases from DSM Chemicals NA Inc., Augusta , GA

TRI ID: 30903DSMCHNO1CO



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called Ms. Connell on May 7, 2015 . She was not available to talk at the time but said she would call me back

the following day.

I left a message on May 12 at 2:15 pm.

Ms. Connell returned my call on May 14 , 5:00 pm . She confirmed TRI nitrate discharge. Facility samples

wastewater three times a week and calculated a monthly average. Facility takes monthl y average and multiples

by flow to calculate annual pounds discharged. Most of nitrate discharges come from nitrification/denitrification

on site wastewater treatment plant. The plant prod uces caprolactam, a monomer used to make nylon 6 (for use

in nylon fibers )

. Oxidation of organic raw materials during processing forms ammonia and nitrites. These

compounds are then oxidized in the wastewater treatment plant to form nitrate.
UAVRG, LLC Pre

- Mission Planning

1 | P a g e

Review Propose Flight Area/NOTAM/TFR/ Airspace ConstrantsUAVRG, LLC Pre

- Mission Planning

2 | P a g e

Insturment Approach VOR/DME Rwy 22

– Alt 2200AGLUAVRG, LLC Pre

- Mission Planning

3 | P a g e

Sunrise/Sunset/UAVForecast

Terminal Area Forecast Nearest StationUAVRG, LLC Pre

- Mission Planning

4 | P a g e

Review Flight Plan
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Sec.1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of O2Diesel Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Alan
      Rae, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David H. Shipman, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
      best of my knowledge that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 14, 2006




By:
            /s/
                Alan Rae
            By:
            /s/
                David H. ShipmanName:
            Alan
                Rae
            Name:
            David
                H. ShipmanTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
            Title:
            Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer




This
      certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
      requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
      be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than
      as
      specifically required by law.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to O2Diesel Corporation and will be retained by O2Diesel Corporation
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard A. Wickett,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

May 9, 2003                                        By: /s/ Richard A. Wickett
                                                       ----------------------

                                                   Richard A. Wickett
                                                   Chairman, Chief Financial
                                                   Officer and Treasurer
<PAGE>


         Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of the CEO Pursuant to Section 906
                            of the Sarbanes Oxley Act

I, Walter Thomas Price III, the chief executive officer of Rogers International
Raw Materials Fund L.P. certify that (i) the Form 10Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rogers
International Raw Materials Fund L.P.

                             /s/ Walter Thomas Price III
                             ---------------------------
                Chief Executive Officer of Beeland Management Company
                                November 7, 2003

       Exhibit 32.2 - Certification of the CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of
                             the Sarbanes Oxley Act

I, Richard Chambers, the chief financial officer of Rogers International Raw
Materials Fund L.P. certify that (i) the Form 10Q fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rogers
International Raw Materials Fund L.P.

                             /s/ Richard Chambers
                             -----------------------
                             Chief Financial Officer
                                November 7, 2003
Opinion issued August 28 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 18
- 00016
- CR

——————————— SHAWN BULENT BUTLER , Appella nt

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1479420

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Shaun Bulent Butler, pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon with an agreement from the State to cap punishment at 30 years’ imprisonment. In accordance with the terms of this plea bargain agreement with the2

State, the trial court sentenced appellant to 15 years’ imprisonment. Appellant filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after get ting the trial court’s permission to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An agreement placing a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Shankle v. State , 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Wilson v. State , 264 S.W.3d 104, 108 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); Waters v. State , 124 S.W.3d 825, 826

– 27 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d). Because the record shows that appellant agreed to the State ’ s recommendation of a cap of 30 years on sentencing, this is a plea bargain case under Rule 25.2(a)(2) and appellant has no right to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)( 2) An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal and states that
appe llant waived the right of appeal. The record contains plea papers signed by appellant show ing that he agreed to waive his right to appeal in exchange for the plea agreement capping his sentence at 30 years’ imprisonment. T he record thus3

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)

. Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Chavez , 183 S.W.3d at 680 (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction t o ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes , Bland, and Lloyd

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Did You Know - Shred Policy

By Lisa R. Brame & Jack E. White DLA Intelligence Columbus

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Implementation of 100% Shred Policy. 

Did you know the DLA Land and Maritime Commander, Navy Rear Adm. Skubic, implemented the above mentioned policy on March 24, 2017. The policy mandates all sensitive unclassified information (i.e. critical information, PII, rosters, notes, reports, FOUO, etc.) be destroyed upon completion of use using an approved cross-cut shredder, or placed in one of the collection receptacles that are placed throughout the Land and Maritime facilities. 

Additional countermeasures that must be used to safeguard our sensitive information includes enforcing the “need to know” principle; encrypting electronic communications (email); and ensuring conversations regarding sensitive information cannot be overheard. Adhering to this policy makes it increasingly difficult for the adversary to get a clear picture of our capabilities, intentions and limitations.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MOPSEC L&M
No. 43174.

#### Protests 302583-G, etc., of Shalom & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the evidence it was found that certain items consist of Venice laces similar to those involved in *Littwitz*v. *United States*(3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) and filet lace, Saxony lace, and Normandy lace similar to the merchandise passed upon in *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), *Beyda*v. *United States*(T. D. 46177), and *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.
Before the First Division,

April 7, 1943

No. 48169.

#### Protest 94561-K of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *May Co.*v. *United States*(T. D. 47760) and *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 48573) the claim at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 was sustained.
No. 56721.

protest 182019-K (New York).

#### Jay Thorpe, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of beaded bags the same in all material respects as those the classification of which was involved in Abstract 56124, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.