25252 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 86 / Friday, May 4, 2007 / Notices 

goods; and the profit rate as a 

percentage of the cost of manufacture 

plus SG&A and traded goods. See 

Surrogate Value Memorandum for a full 

discussion of the calculation of these 

ratios. 

For packing materials, we used the 

per–kilogram values obtained from the 

Indian WTA import data and made 

adjustments to account for freight costs 

incurred between the PRC supplier and 

Shanghai Fortune. See Surrogate Value 

Memorandum at Attachment 4. 

Currency Conversion 

We made currency conversions into 

U.S. dollars, in accordance with section 

773A(a) of the Act, based on the 

exchange rates in effect on the dates of 

the U.S. sales, as certified by the Federal 

Reserve Bank. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily find the weighted– 

average dumping margin for Shanghai 

Fortune for the period July 1 2005, 

through June 30, 2006, to be 47.60 

percent. 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations used 

in our preliminary analysis to parties to 

this proceeding within five days of the 

publication date of this notice. See 19 

CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties are 

invited to comment on the preliminary 

results and may submit case briefs and/ 

or written comments within 30 days of 

the date of publication of this notice. 

See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). Any 

interested party may request a hearing 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Any 

hearing, if requested, will be held 42 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(d). Rebuttal 

briefs and rebuttals to written 

comments, limited to issues raised in 

such briefs or comments, may be filed 

no later than 35 days after the date of 

publication. See 19 CFR 351.309(d). The 

Department requests that parties 

submitting written comments also 

provide the Department with an 

additional copy of those comments on 

diskette or CD. The Department will 

issue the final results of this 

administrative review, which will 

include the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any such comments, 

within 120 days of publication of these 

preliminary results, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this administrative review. In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

we calculated an exporter/importer–or 

customer–specific assessment rate or 

value for merchandise subject to this 

review. For these preliminary results, 

we divided the total dumping margins 

for the reviewed sales by the total 

entered quantity of those reviewed sales 

for each applicable importer. In this 

review, if these preliminary results are 

adopted in our final results of review, 

we will direct CBP to assess the 

resulting rate against the entered 

customs value or per–unit assessment, 

as appropriate, for the subject 

merchandise on each importers’/ 

customers’ entries during the POR. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Shanghai 

Fortune, which has a separate rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the company– 

specific rate established in the final 

results of review (except, if the rate is 

zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will 

be required); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and non– 

PRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter–specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the PRC–wide rate 

of 329.33 percent; and (4) for all non– 

PRC exporters of subject merchandise 

which have not received their own rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporters that 

supplied that non–PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 27, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–8581 Filed 5–3–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–351–826) 

Certain Small Diameter Seamless 

Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line 

and Pressure Pipe from Brazil: Notice 

of Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen Bailey or Dena Crossland, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0193 or (202) 482– 

3362, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 29, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published a notice of 

initiation of administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

small diameter seamless carbon and 

alloy steel standard, line and pressure 

pipe from Brazil, covering the period 

August 1, 2005, through July 31, 2006. 

See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 71 FR 57465 (September 29, 

2006). The preliminary results for this 

review are currently due no later than 

May 3, 2007. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires the Department to issue the 

preliminary results of an administrative 

review within 245 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month of an order for 

which a review is requested and the 

final results of review within 120 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 86 / Friday, May 4, 2007 / Notices 25253 

results are published. If it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend these deadlines to 

a maximum of 365 days and 180 days, 

respectively. 

Extension of Time Limits for 

Preliminary Results 

The deadline for the preliminary 

results of this administrative review is 

currently May 3, 2007. The Department 

determines that completion of the 

preliminary results within the statutory 

time period is not practicable. The 

Department issued a supplemental sales 

and cost questionnaire to respondent 

V&M do Brasil, S.A. (‘‘VMB’’) to gather 

information with respect to how VMB 

reported certain production costs and 

calculated its interest expense ratio on 

April 18, 2007, and the supplemental 

questionnaire response is currently due 

on May 2, 2007. The Department 

requires additional time to review and 

analyze VMB’s supplemental 

questionnaire response, and to issue 

additional supplemental cost 

questionnaires, if necessary. 

Therefore, given the additional time 

needed to conduct complete analyses 

for this administrative review, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, the Department is extending the 

time limit for completion of these 

preliminary results by an additional 60 

days to no later than July 2, 2007. The 

final results continue to be due no later 

than 120 days after the publication of 

the notice of the preliminary results. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: April 30, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–8586 Filed 5–3–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–489–807) 

Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing 

Bars from Turkey; Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Review and 

Notice of Intent to Revoke in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review and a new 

shipper review of the antidumping duty 

order on certain steel concrete 

reinforcing bars (rebar) from Turkey for 

the period April 1, 2005, through March 

31, 2006. We have preliminarily 

determined that certain of the 

producers/exporters have made sales 

below normal value (NV). If these 

preliminary results are adopted in the 

final results of these reviews, we will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries. 

We also have preliminarily 

determined to revoke the antidumping 

duty order with respect to Colakoglu 

Metalurji A.S. and Colakoglu Dis Ticaret 

A.S. (collectively ‘‘Colakoglu’’) and Diler 

Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S., 

Yazici Demir Celik Sanayi ve Turizm 

Ticaret A.S., and Diler Dis Ticaret A.S. 

(collectively, ‘‘Diler’’). 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

We will issue the final results no later 

than 120 days from the date of 

publication of this notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 4, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irina 

Itkin or Alice Gibbons, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration–Room B099, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0656 or (202) 482–0498, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 3, 2006, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of ‘‘Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review’’ of the 

antidumping duty order on rebar from 

Turkey. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 71 

FR 16549 (Apr. 3, 2006). 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b)(2), on April 28, 2006, the 

Department received requests to 

conduct an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on rebar from 

Turkey from the following producers/ 

exporters of rebar: Colakoglu; Diler; 

Ekinciler Demir ve Celik Sanayi A.S. 

and Ekinciler Dis Ticaret A.S. 

(collectively ‘‘Ekinciler’’); Habas Sinai ve 

Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S. 

(Habas); and Kaptan Demir Celik 

Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S. and Kaptan 

Metal Dis Ticaret ve Nakliyat A.S. 

(collectively ‘‘Kaptan’’). As part of their 

requests, Colakoglu and Diler also 

requested that the Department revoke 

the antidumping order with regard to 

them, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.222(b). Also, on April 28, 2006, the 

domestic interested parties, Nucor 

Corporation, Gerdau AmeriSteel 

Corporation and Commercial Metals 

Company, requested an administrative 

review for Colakoglu, Diler, Ekinciler, 

and Habas pursuant to section 751(a) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act), and in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b)(1). Further, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.214(b), on April 28, 

2006, the Department received a request 

to conduct a new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on rebar from 

Turkey from Kroman Celik Sanayii A.S. 

and Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve 

Pazarlama A.S. (collectively ‘‘Kroman’’). 

In May 2006, the Department initiated 

an administrative review for Colakoglu, 

Diler, Ekinciler, Habas, and Kaptan and 

a new shipper review for Kroman, and 

we issued antidumping duty 

questionnaires to these companies. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 71 FR 30864 (May 31, 2006), and 

Notice of Initiation of New Shipper 

Antidumping Duty Review: Certain Steel 

Concrete Reinforcing Bars from Turkey, 

71 FR 30383 (May 26, 2006). On May 

22, 2006, Kroman agreed in writing to 

waive the time limits in order for the 

Department, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.214(j)(3), to conduct the new 

shipper review concurrently with the 

administrative review. 

In July 2006, we received responses to 

sections A through D of the 

questionnaire from Colakoglu, Diler, 

Ekinciler, and Habas, and to sections A 

through C of the questionnaire from 

Kaptan and Kroman. 

Also in July 2006, the domestic 

interested parties requested that the 

Department initiate sales–below-cost 

investigations of Kaptan and Kroman. 

We initiated sales–below-cost 

investigations for these companies in 

August 2006. See the Memoranda to 

James Maeder, Director, Office 2, AD/ 

CVD Operations, from The Team, 

entitled, ‘‘Petitioners’ Allegation of Sales 

Below the Cost of Production for Kaptan 

Demir Celik Endustrisi Ve Ticaret A.S. 

and Kaptan Metal Dis Ticaret Ve 

Nakliyat A.S.’’ (‘‘Kaptan Cost Allegation 

Memo’’) and ‘‘Petitioners’ Allegation of 

Sales Below the Cost of Production for 

Kroman Celik Sanayii A.S. and 

Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama 

A.S.’’ (‘‘Kroman Cost Allegation Memo’’), 

dated August 11, 2006. 

In August 2006, we issued 

supplemental sales questionnaires to 

each of the six respondent companies. 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES