alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014039EN.01002801.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/28

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 12 December 2013 — Hall v Commission and CEPOL

(Case F-22/12) (1)

1

(Civil service - Remuneration - Family allowances - Dependent child allowance - Education allowance - Children of applicant’s wife not living at the home of the couple - Conditions for granting)

2014/C 39/50

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mark Hall (Petersfield, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents) and European Police College (CEPOL) (represented by: F. Bánfi, Agent)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decisions rejecting the applicant’s request for the grant of dependent child and education allowances in respect of his wife’s three children for the period in which they were still living in the Philippines.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible, in so far as it is directed against the European Police College; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible, in so far as it is directed against the European Police College;

| 2. | Annuls the implied decision of 25 March 2011 and the express decision of 11 July 2011 of the European Commission rejecting the application for dependent child and education allowances for the three children of Mr Hall’s wife, for the period in which they were still living in the Philippines; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the implied decision of 25 March 2011 and the express decision of 11 July 2011 of the European Commission rejecting the application for dependent child and education allowances for the three children of Mr Hall’s wife, for the period in which they were still living in the Philippines;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the action brought against the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the action brought against the European Commission;

| 4. | Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Hall; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Hall;

| 5. | Orders Mr Hall to pay the costs incurred by the European Police College. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Mr Hall to pay the costs incurred by the European Police College.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 35.

1

---
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements No. 33-21704, No. 33-24096, No. 33-37300, No. 33-65104, No. 33-56717, No. 333-42903, No. 333-59811, No. 333-61214, and No. 333-117850 on Form S-8 and No. 333-47909 on Form S-3
of our report dated March 1, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of two new accounting standards), relating to the consolidated financial statements of The McClatchy
Company and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The McClatchy Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|Sacramento, California   
|March 1, 2007
o 

hctci: b(sf bsr-/W-^^^^ 

ULS. Deportmiir of 1200 New jersey Avenue, SE 

Transportation Washington, DC 20590 

Office Of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

May 4, 2010 

VIA FACSIMILE 

Mr. Russ Machen 

Manager 

Cortez Municipal Airport 

210 East Main Street 

Cortez, Colorado 81321 

Dear Mr. Machen: 

I would like to update you on the essential air service situation at Alamosa and Cortez and 

give you an opportunity to submit comments, if you wish. 

As you know, by Order 2010-3-34, issued March 30, 2010, the Department solicited 

proposals from air carriers interested in providing essential air service at the communities in 

anticipation of the end of the current contract on July 31, 2010. At this stage, we would 

normally ask for your preferences for various carriers and service options. However, in 

response to that order, Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (the incumbent), was the only carrier to 

submit a proposal. Nonetheless, we want to give you an opportunity to submit any final 

comments for the record that you may have before we make a carrier-selection 

recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. 

In addition to our brief description below, the proposal, as well as Order 2010-3-34, can be 

viewed online at www.regulations.gov. by doing a search on Docket DOT-OST-1997-2960 or 

DOT-OST-1998-3508. 

Great Lakes proposes to continue operating its current level of service, i.e., 18 nonstop round 

trips per week between each community and Denver International Airport, with 19-seat 

Beech 1900 aircraft, at the annual subsidy rate of $1,987,155 for Alamosa, and $1,847,657 at 

Cortez. 

Please note that proposed schedules are illustrative and the carriers may make schedule 

changes to reflect changing conditions. The Department expects subsidized air carriers to 

maintain well-timed and well-spaced flights to ensure full compensation. 

My purpose in writing to you at this time is to give you an opportunity to submit any final 

comments you might have on the proposed service. We request that you review this 
information as expeditiously as possible and submit any comments you may have as soon as 

possible, but in any case no later than June 4, 2010. We will carefully consider your 

comments before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for a final decision. 

If you have questions, or if you find that you need additional time to draft your comments, 

please let us know. 

Please submit your comments to me at: EAS@dot.gov. 

In addition, we would appreciate if you would email your comments to both 

dennis.devany@dot.gov and renee.williams@dot.gov. You should also send a copy of your 

comments to Great Lakes. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Renee 

Williams of my staff at 202-366-1058. 

An identical letter has been sent to the Mayor of Cortez. 

Sincerely, 

n 

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1585 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1585

    To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility 
 requirements to foreign nongovernmental organizations with respect to 
the provision of assistance under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act 
                                of 1961.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2011

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Kerry, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
Brown of Ohio, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Begich, Mr. 
Cardin, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Akaka, Mrs. Gillibrand, 
   Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Whitehouse, and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the application of certain restrictive eligibility 
 requirements to foreign nongovernmental organizations with respect to 
the provision of assistance under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act 
                                of 1961.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Global Democracy Promotion Act''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR FOREIGN NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS UNDER PART 
              I OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, regulation, or policy, 
in determining eligibility for assistance authorized under part I of 
the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.), foreign 
nongovernmental organizations--
            (1) shall not be ineligible for such assistance solely on 
        the basis of health or medical services, including counseling 
        and referral services, provided by such organizations with non-
        United States Government funds if such services do not violate 
        the laws of the country in which they are being provided and 
        would not violate United States Federal law if provided in the 
        United States; and
            (2) shall not be subject to requirements relating to the 
        use of non-United States Government funds for advocacy and 
        lobbying activities other than those that apply to United 
        States nongovernmental organizations receiving assistance under 
        part I of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
University of Kentucky
    UK Libraries
    Special Collections Research Center
Menu
    About
                    About ExploreUK
            How to
                    Activate your Researcher AccountRequest MaterialsVisit SCRCFind Copyright and Use Information
            Contact Us
            Researcher Account LoginSearch Home |
    Back to Search Results

Download
    JPEGof this page
    PDFof entire itemCombined Farming-Industrial Employment in the Lumber Subregion of Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina
Date
1936Creator
United States Works Progress Administration Division of Social Research Rural Section.Language
EnglishCollection
South Carolina Works Progress Administration PublicationsDescription
Preliminary report; Prepared by W. W. Troxell and others; leaves: illustrations, maps, charts, 27 cm; Cover title has Research Bulletin (Not for Release); UK holds archival copy for ASERL Collaborative Federal Depository Program libraries; Call number Y 3.W 89/2:13/J6

You may come across language in UK Libraries Special Collections Research Center collections and online resources that you find harmful or offensive. SCRC collects materials from different cultures and time periods to preserve and make available the historical record. These materials document the time period when they were created and the view of their creator. As a result, some may demonstrate racist and offensive views that do not reflect the values of UK Libraries.

If you find description with problematic language that you think SCRC should review, please contact us at SCRC@uky.edu.

Item Details
Text

Rights
This digital resource may be freely searched and displayed in accordance with U. S. copyright laws.Geographic Subject
Alabama, Georgia and South CarolinaPublisher
Washington, D.C.Format
booksPermalink
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/catalog/xt7cvd6p2k5fXML Metadata
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt7cvd6p2k5f/data/mets.xml

The text may or may not be an accurate representation of the original.
#### Meadows Wye & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6510.

Entry No. 723534, etc.

Invoices dated Staffordshire, England, September 12, 1941, etc.

Certified September 23, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 8, 1941, etc.

(Decided November 14, 1946)

*Jordan*& *Klingaman*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliveb, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in- schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
December 30, 1957

Reap. Dec. 9046.

#### Roberts, *Reilly & Johns*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y, R@ap. Dgc, 9026, Motion by defendant.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1685 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow rehabilitation 

expenditures for public school buildings to qualify for rehabilitation credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 12, 2011 

Mr. WEBB (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow rehabilitation expenditures for public school buildings to qualify for rehabilitation credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rehabilitation of His5 toric Schools Act of 2011’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1685 IS

1 SEC. 2. QUALIFICATION OF REHABILITATION EXPENDI2 TURES FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL BUILDINGS FOR 

3 REHABILITATION CREDIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 47(c)(2)(B)(v) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following new subclause: 

7 ‘‘(III) CLAUSE NOT TO APPLY TO

8 PUBLIC SCHOOLS.—This clause shall 

9 not apply in the case of any building 

10 which is a qualified public educational 

11 facility (as defined in section 

12 142(k)(1), determined without regard 

13 to subparagraph (B) thereof) and 

14 used as such during some period be15 fore such expenditure and used as 

16 such immediately after such expendi17 ture.’’. 

18 (b) REPORT.—Not later than the date which is 5 

19 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec20 retary of the Treasury, after consultation with the heads 

21 of appropriate Federal agencies, shall report to Congress 

22 on the effects resulting from the amendment made by sub23 section (a). 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1685 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Searched for **https://www.neglecteddiseases.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.neglecteddiseases.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
# C_2013086EN.01003001.xml

| 23.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/30

---

Action brought on 24 December 2012 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-158/12)

2013/C 86/50

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision rejecting the request for employment of the applicant as a member of the contract staff in function group III which was made by the Office for Infrastructures and Logistics in Luxembourg and damages for the material damage suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Head of Unit of the ‘Recruitment and end of service’ unit (DG HR.B.2) of the European Commission of 6 March 2012 rejecting the application for employment of the applicant as a member of the contract staff in function group III which had been made by the Office for Infrastructures and Logistics in Luxembourg; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Head of Unit of the ‘Recruitment and end of service’ unit (DG HR.B.2) of the European Commission of 6 March 2012 rejecting the application for employment of the applicant as a member of the contract staff in function group III which had been made by the Office for Infrastructures and Logistics in Luxembourg;

| — | order the defendant to compensate for the material damage caused to the applicant by the contested decision; to evaluate the amount corresponding to the difference between the payments corresponding to function group III since the month of October 2011 and those payments which he continued to receive as a member of the contractual staff of function group I, plus corresponding interest from the due date of each months’ pay until the date of their actual payment; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to compensate for the material damage caused to the applicant by the contested decision; to evaluate the amount corresponding to the difference between the payments corresponding to function group III since the month of October 2011 and those payments which he continued to receive as a member of the contractual staff of function group I, plus corresponding interest from the due date of each months’ pay until the date of their actual payment;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Improving Your Communication Skills

By Drew HendersonDLA Land and Maritime Employee Assistance Program

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
At its most  basic level, communication is defined as the transfer of information from a sender to a receiver.  Eliminating “noise,” reaching mutual understanding, and “feeding back” are all essential to good communication. 

Effective communication is all about conveying your messages to other people clearly and unambiguously. It's also about receiving information that others are sending to you, with as little distortion as possible.  

To learn more about the process and to gain valuable skills to enhance communication, join the Employee Assistance Program at 1 p.m. on Nov. 14 in the Building 20 Buckeye Room.  

This is a one hour seminar and Land and Maritime associates will receive one hour of absorbed time. 

Please check with your supervisor and email EAP to register.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MEAPseminarTraining L&MPersonal Development L&M
No. 65806.

#### Chicago Musical Instrument Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/27797-11470, 60/27803-11484, and 60/27823-11447 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bamboo sticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Rico Products Co. et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 100, C.D. 2159), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Chase Bottle & Supply Corp. *v.*United States

No. 7727.

Entry Nos. 799833; 801880/2; 809723.

(Decided August 4, 1949)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*264Lawrence, Judge:

The three appeals listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve the question of the proper value of certain bottle caps imported from Holland.

Said appeals have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation in which it has been agreed that the issues herein are the same in all material respects as the issues in *Budde & Westermann*v. *United States,*22 Cust. Ct. 441, Reap. Dec. 7699, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence herein. Counsel have also agreed upon certain values as representing the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value.

Upon the agreed statement of facts, and following the cited authority, I find the proper dutiable export value of the bottle caps in question to be:

> Gold bronze_ 30/45 FL 6.85

> Colored wax_ 30/45 FL 6.55

> Bronze..__ 29/53 FL 8.35

all net packed, less ocean freight and marine insurance. Judgment will issue accordingly.