alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7314** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DWIGHT LAMONT ASHE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:04

- cr - 00088

- HEH

- 1 )

Submitted : June 27, 2013 Decided: July 9, 2013

Before KING and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Dwight Lamont Ashe, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dwight Lamont Ashe appeals the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part his motion to correct a clerical error in sentencing reflected in the July 2, 2012 order granting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and fin d no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court **.** United States v. Ashe , No. 3:04

- cr - 00088

- HEH

- 1 (E.D. Va. July 26, 2012) **.** We deny Ashe’s motion to expedite as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

(SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



I, Noel J. Guillama, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Quantum Group, Inc. for the quarter ended April 30, 2007;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal controls over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.





Date: June 19, 2007



/s/Noel J. Guillama

Noel J. Guillama

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on
Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004, I, Kevin M. Goodwin, Chief Executive Officer of SonoSite, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


| |  | (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | (2)  the information contained in such Annual Report
on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of SonoSite, Inc.
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ KEVIN M. GOODWINKevin M. GoodwinPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


March 15, 2005

84

---
No. 48180.

#### Protest 95789-K of Haug & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wheat malt the same in all materia] respects as the merchandise the subject of *Haug*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D 682), which merchandise was held dutiable at 40 cents per TOO pounds under paragraph 722, Tariff Act of 1930, by virtue of the similitude provisions of paragraph 1559, the protest was sustained.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Asset management: keeping mission accountable

By Airman 1st Class Sean Campbell92d Air Refueling Wing

                Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington  –              ***The following story appears as it was published by the 92d Air Refueling Wing on the Defense Video Imagery Distribution System website:******Editor's Note: Besides the disposition means mentioned in the original story, usable computers can be provided to schools enrolled in the Computers for Learning program operated by DLA Disposition Services. ***

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v HENRY A. NEWMAN, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

8 USCMA 615, 25 CMR 119

No. 10,833

Decided January 24, 1958

*Major R. D. Humphreys,*USMC, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Craig McKee,*USN, and *Lieutenant (jg) John V. L. Ellicott,*USNR, were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused contends, and the Goverment concedes, that the staff judge advocate’s post-trial advice to the convening authority is legally insufficient. United States v Grice, 8 USCMA 166, 23 CMR 390; United States v Johnson, 8 USCMA 173, 23 CMR 397.

The decision of the board of review is reversed and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for reference to a competent convening authority for further proceedings in accordance with Articles 61 and 64, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 861, 864.

Judge FERGUSON concurs.

LatimeR, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

This accused was charged with larceny of an automobile, but the court-martial by exceptions and substitutions reduced the offense to wrongful appropriation. While the division legal officer’s review does not use the magic words beyond a reasonable doubt, he carefully relates the testimony. Thereafter he states that the findings are supported by the evidence. I assume from the latter statement that when the standard used by the court-martial in arriving at its findings is guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the reviewing lawyer understands he must find support in the record of that quantity and quality. Furthermore, the convening authority could not have misunderstood the language used, for the summation of facts, which was accurate, would give him a picture not only of proof *616beyond a reasonable doubt but a clear portrayal of compelling evidence of the violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. A reasonable person could not read the record or be informed of its contents and reach any result except that of guilt. The testimony of the prosecution witnesses not only shows facts and circumstances which convict the accused, but there is a written pretrial confession of wrongful appropriation executed by him. When I look for rebutting testimony, I find none. Under those circumstances, the comments of the legal officer could not conceivably mislead the convening authority or be construed in such a manner as to suggest that the reviewer was using any test less than reasonable doubt.

I would affirm the decision of the board of review.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 306 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 306

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2008

 Mr. Waxman (for himself, Mr. Cantor, Mr. LaTourette, and Mr. Cannon) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY.

    The Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on May 1, 2008, 
for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of remembrance 
of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 8, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00476

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.S.G. AND J.G.,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA00010

Honorable Solomon Casseb III, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief is hereby GRANTED.

Time is extended to October 16, 2018.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### Walter GREEN, Appellant, v. McDonnell DOUGLAS, et al., Respondents.

No. 73815.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 28, 1998.

*33Macarthur Moten, St. Louis, for appellant.

David I. Hares, Clayton, for respondents.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Walter Green (“claimant”), appeals from the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the “Commission”), wherein it ordered claimant to pay respondents’, McDonnell Douglas (Aramak Services, Inc.) and its insurer (collectively “employer”), costs pursuant to RSMo section 287.560(1994). We affirm.

Rule 84.04 governs the form and content of appellate briefs. Specifically, Rule 84.04(d) requires Points Relied On to “state briefly and concisely what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be reviewed and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous,_” Claimant raises five points on appeal, several of which are redundant, and all of which fail to conform with Rule 84.04(d).1 Three things are required of a Point Relied On: “(1) a statement of the action or ruling complained of; (2) why the ruling was erroneous; and (3) wherein the evidence supports the position the party asserts the trial court should have taken.” *In re Marriage of Rippee,*862 S.W.2d 493, 494 (Mo.App. S.D.1993). Insufficient points relied on preserve nothing for this court to review. *Id.*

Accordingly, the Commission’s award is affirmed.

1

. For example, claimant's first point reads, "The Commission erred in it’s [sic] decision because the employee’s application for review was based on reasonable grounds.” This point and its deficiencies are representative of the other four points raised.
Exhibit 12 (a)

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.
                             -----------------------

                Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                          (in thousands, except ratios)


                                                              Twelve-month
                                                              period ended
                                                            December 31, 2001
                                                            -----------------

Net income..............................................       $ 52,277
                                                                ----------
Fixed Charges
      Audit Fees........................................             20
      Trustee Fees......................................            121.50
      Administrative and Consulting Fees................          1,082.56
                                                                ----------

Total Fixed Charges.....................................          1,224.06
                                                                ----------
Earnings before fixed charges...........................       $ 53,501.06
                                                                ==========
Fixed charges, as above.................................          1,224.06
                                                                ----------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges......................          43.71
                                                                  =====
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 Nos. 333-30976, 333-47101, 33-56615 and 333-56675 and Form S-3 No.
333-84461, of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. (formerly U.S. Industries, Inc.) of our report dated November 8, 2002 except
for Note 13, as to which the date is July 15, 2003; and
Paragraphs 4 through 10 of Note 1 as to which the date is
October 16, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc., as
amended, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
September 30, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

| |  |                      
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

West Palm Beach, Florida
November 21, 2003

75
Exhibit 99.2

RITA Medical Systems, Inc.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RITA Medical Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Donald Stewart

Donald Stewart

Chief Financial Officer

March 28, 2003
No. 65796.

#### American Wine Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 217575-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Career Mapping Resources

DLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Check out the new blog posted on the DLA Director's Blog. You can read Career Mapping Resources – You Are the Captain of Your Own Career Ship; Guest Blog by Brad Bunn, Director of DLA Human Resources at DLA Director's Blog.  

*The DLA Director's Blog is a DLA CAC enabled site.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA Land and MaritimeCareers L&MCommunity L&MCulture L&MDLA L&MPACER/Intern L&MResource the Enterprise L&MPersonal Development L&MTraining L&M
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Maternity Protection of Employed Women

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Maternity Protection of Employed Women : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 240*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1952,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5512,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER