alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Clarence H. JORGENSEN, Clarence H. Jorgensen, Administrator, and General Motors Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Otto HENNING and Carter Carburetor Corporation, Defendants.

No. 4544.

United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.

Dec. 1, 1948.

John H. Bruninga and John H. Sutherland, both of St. Louis, Mo., and Alex F. Baillo, of Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and George R. Ericson and Bertram H. Mann, Jr., both of St. Louis, Mo., for defendants.

DUNCAN, District Judge.

This is a suit brought under Revised Statutes, § 4915, Title 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent embodied in the claim, which was the subject matter of an interference proceeding before the Patent Office, to the *622General Motors Corporation, assignee of plaintiffs Clarence H. Jorgensen and Clarence H. Jorgensen, Administrator, pursuant to application No. 585,510 filed January 8, 1932.

For the purpose of trial this suit was consolidated with the case of Jorgensen et al. v. Ericson et al., D.C., 81 F.Supp. 614, in which a memorandum opinion has been filed this day. The facts and the law in the Ericson case are applicable to this case. The interference proceeding before the Patent Office was heard in this case and in the Ericson case at the same time and the .court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the patent in controversy are the same as in the Ericson case. It is so ordered.

The parties may submit findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance herewith. . ■
No. M-65.

No. M-66.

#### Hartnett *v.*Stein, dba Western Contruction Co.; and Tidik *v.*Kaufman et al.

Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# The Internet Wants YOU: Consider a Career in Cybersecurity 

By DLA CERTDLA CERT

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
DLA offers exciting careers and opportunities for growth and development for any level of your career ladder - from entry to full performance level, including students and veterans.

DLA provides the challenges for a satisfying position with a family-friendly culture and excellent benefits.

Visit DLA Careers on the web to explore a future with DLA, or check out USAJOBS.gov to search available positions.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Stories

Simple Steps to Online Safety

Cybersecurity in the Workplace is Everyone’s Business

Today’s Predictions for Tomorrow’s Internet

Protecting critical infrastructure from cyber threats information technology systems

CarrersLabor Management L&MCulture L&MPAL
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8927]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-419-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2007, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective 
date of June 1, 2007:

Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 2
Third Revised Sheet No. 102
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 160
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 161
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 188
Second Revised Sheet No. 297A
Second Revised Sheet No. 302
Second Revised Sheet No. 364
Second Revised Sheet No. 368A

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97d1d2c5d4d8f9fbfef9f2c4e2e7e7f8e5e3d7f1f2e5f4b9f0f8e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcfaf9eefff3d2d0d5d2d9efc9ccccd3cec8fcdad9cedf92dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8927 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-707-709 (Second Review)]


Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and 
Pressure Pipe From Argentina, Brazil, and Germany

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
orders on certain seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and 
pressure pipe from Argentina and Brazil would not be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\ The Commission 
also determines that revocation of the antidumping duty order on 
certain seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure 
pipe from Germany would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence 
of material injury to an industry in the United States within a 
reasonably foreseeable time.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting, Commissioner Dean 
A. Pinkert not participating.
    \3\ Chairman Daniel R. Pearson and Commissioner Deanna Tanner 
Okun dissenting, Commissioner Dean A. Pinkert not participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on June 1, 2006 (71 FR 
31209) and determined on September 5, 2006 that it would conduct full 
reviews (71 FR 54520, September 15, 2006). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
September 29, 2006 (71 FR 57567). The hearing was held in Washington, 
DC, on February 8, 2007, and all persons who requested the opportunity 
were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on May 2, 2007. The views of the Commission 
are contained in USITC Publication 3918 (May 2007), entitled Certain 
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from 
Argentina, Brazil, and Germany.

     Issued: May 3, 2007.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E7-8786 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50515 Summary Calendar

STEVEN GILBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KNOWLES, Warden, ANDERSON, Warden, WAYNE SCOTT, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CV-369

- - - - - - - - - - March 22, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Steven Gilbert appeals the denial with prejudice of his civil rights action following the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants. The defendants did not violate Gilbert’s right to due process by transferring him from the Kyle unit to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) without giving him notice, a counsel substitute, and a hearing onthe disciplinary charge Gilbert alleges the parole board used to

set aside his tentative parole date. See Allison v. Kyle , 66 F.3d 71, 74 (5th Cir. 1995). By not arguing on appeal whether he received due process regarding the disciplinary charge against him once he was transferred back to TDCJ, Gilbert has abandoned this issue. See Brinkmann v. Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133235 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### MARY L. BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133235 COA: 272450 WCAC: 05-000104 STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 5, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
<PAGE>



                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1


MODUS MEDIA, INC.
MMI
COMMON STOCK
COMMON STOCK
CUSIP 607861 10 1
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT
is the owner of
SEE REVERSE
FOR RESTRICTIONS
ON TRANSFER
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01, of
MODUS MEDIA, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder
hereof, in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon the surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented
hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware and to the Certificate
of Incorporation and By-Laws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended.
This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and
registered by the Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.
Dated:
VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER
CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
BY



AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

================================================================================

MODUS MEDIA, INC. (the "Corporation") will furnish without charge to each
stockholder who so requests from its Secretary the powers, designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of
each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or
restrictions thereof.
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM
TEN ENT
JT TEN
-as tenants in common
-as tenants by the entireties
-as joint tenants with right of
<PAGE>



survivorship and not as tenants
in common
UNIF GIFT MIN ACTD               Custodian
                                 (Cust)                        (Minor)
                under Uniform Gifts to Minors
                Act
                                      (State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
   For value received,                               hereby sell, assign and
   transfer unto
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF
ASSIGNEE.
Shares
of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint
Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation
with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated,
(The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon
the face of this Certificate in every particular, without alteration or
enlargement or any change whatever.)
SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:
THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION
(BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH
MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM) PURSUANT TO
S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00753-CV

In re Jerry Conerly

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I ON

Relator Jerry Conerly has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss his petition for writ

of mandamus, stating that the parties have settled the underlying proceeding and he no longer wishes

to pursue the issues asserted in the petition for writ of mandamus. We grant the motion and dismiss

the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland

Filed: January 8, 2016
33810.

#### MULLINS v. HOPPER.

Submitted July 12, 1978

Decided September 8, 1978.

*Derrickson, Bowen & West, Thomas M. West,*for appellant.

*Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, John W. Dunsmore, Jr., Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.

Per curiam.

Robeson Mullins raises on habeas the ineffective assistance of his appointed counsel in both Meriwether and Muscogee counties. Both attorneys, aware of Mullins’ long history of schizophrenia and his diagnosis as being in psychosis when arrested, advised he plead guilty to charges pending against him in their respective counties, despite the bizarre nature of the incidents. As a result, Mullins was sentenced to ten years for robbery and twelve months for obstruction of an officer in Meriwether County; eleven years for armed robbery, ten for aggravated assault, and two twelve-month sentences for misdemeanor pistol violations in Muscogee County.

We find, under the facts of the alleged crimes and the medical history of the defendant, that both appointed counsel were ineffective. The habeas court erred in not Mullins’ habeas petition.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Jordan, J., who dissents.*
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald D. LaBeau,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Ronald D. LaBeau
---------------------
Ronald D. LaBeau
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 3.2.1

                       CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND MERGER

                                       OF

                              WERNER FINANCIAL INC.
                            (a Delaware corporation)

                                      INTO

                          WERNER HOLDING CO. (DE), INC.
                            (a Delaware corporation)

It is hereby certified that:

1.       WERNER HOLDING CO. (DE), INC. (hereinafter referred to as the 
         "Corporation") is a business corporation of the State of Delaware.

2.       The Corporation is the owner of all of the outstanding shares of the
         stock of WERNER FINANCIAL INC. ("FINANCIAL"), which is also a business
         corporation of the State of Delaware.

3.       On June 22, 1998, the Board of Directors of the Corporation adopted the
         following resolutions to merge FINANCIAL into the Corporation:

         RESOLVED: That FINANCIAL be merged into the Corporation, and that all
         of the estate, property, rights, privileges, powers and franchises of
         FINANCIAL be vested in and held and enjoyed by the Corporation as fully
         and entirely and without change or diminution as the same were before
         held and enjoyed by FINANCIAL in its name; and

         FURTHER RESOLVED:  That the Corporation shall assume all of the 
         obligations of FINANCIAL; and

         FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Corporation shall cause to be executed and
         filed and/or recorded the documents prescribed by the laws of the State
         of Delaware and will cause to be performed all necessary acts within
         the State of Delaware; and

         FURTHER RESOLVED: That the effective time of the Certificate of
         Ownership and Merger setting forth a copy of these resolutions, and the
         time when the merger therein provided for, shall become effective shall
         be 11:59 p.m. on June 30, 1998.

Executed on June 24, 1998
                                          WERNER HOLDING CO. (DE), INC.


                                      By:    /s/ Donald M. Werner
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Donald M. Werner
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JAMES V. PROCTOR, JR., Basic Airman, U. S. Air Force, Appellant

8 USCMA 658, 25 CMR 162

No. 10,629

Decided January 31, 1958

*Lieutenant Colonel Ellis L. Gottlieb*and *Major George M. Wilson*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Robert W. Michels*and *Major Carl Goldschlager*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The issue presented concerns the correctness of an instruction which is similar to that recently condemned in the cases of United States v Cothern, 8 USCMA 158, 23 CMR 382, and United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287. For the reasons set forth in those opinions the accused’s conviction of desertion in the instant case must be set aside.

The decision of the board of review is *659reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for reference to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may approve the lesser offense of absence without leave and reassess the entire sentence or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287.