alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Form      S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-123014;                                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Form      S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-120300;                                                             |
| Form      S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-117966;                                                             |
| Form      S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-122671;                                                             |
| Form      S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-75615;                                                              |
| Form      S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-107064;                                                             |
| Form      S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-75675;                                                              |
| Form      S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-45821;                                                              |
| Form      S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-74280;                                                              |
| Form      S-4 Registration Statement No. 333-83106 ;                                                             |
| Form      S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-138523;                                                             |
| Form      S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-141313;                                                             |
| Form      S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-145619;                                                             |
| Form      S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-57968;                                                              |
| Form      S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-57976;                                                              |
| Form      S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-50917; andForm      S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-159836  |
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Fuels distribution runs a clean operation

By Airman 1st Class Ronald Feliciano Rivera1st Special Operations Wing Public Affairs

                HURLBURT FIELD, Fla.   –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Hurlburt Field website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

1st Special Operations Wing1st Special Operations Logistics Readiness Squadronfuelsfuels flightPetroleum Oils and LubricantsHurlburt FieldfuelPOL
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 309 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.309
                                                  Agreed to June 3, 2008

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On June 6, 2008, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 2008 District of Columbia Special 
Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred to as 
the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as part of the 
journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated July 26, 2006, and published in the Federal 
Register on August 2, 2006, (71 FR 43814), Noramco Inc., 1440 Olympic 
Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601, made application by letter to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of Methylphenidate (1724), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to bulk manufacture methylphenidate for a 
customer to use in the production of a controlled substance product.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Noramco Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled 
substance is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has 
investigated Noramco Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is 
consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included 
inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, 
verification of the company's compliance with State and local laws, and 
a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above 
named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-9651 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 12, 2014

NO. 03-14-00370-CV

Andy Tran, Appellant

v.

Lee and Dang Corporation d/b/a Nails; and Tony Dang, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on February 27, 2014. Appellant 

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that 

the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal.

The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antoine Johnson, Appellant.

[700 NYS2d 744]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), rendered February 19, 1997, convicting him of assault in the second degree, assault in the third degree, intimidating a witness in the third degree, criminal contempt in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The issues raised by the defendant are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In any event, the trial court did not violate the defendant’s constitutional right to consult with counsel when it directed him not to discuss his trial testimony with his attorney at the lunch break during his cross-examination *(see, Perry v Leeke,*488 US 272; *People v Foust,*192 AD2d 718; *People v Enrique,*165 AD2d 13, 16-17, *affd*80 NY2d 869). Furthermore, any improprieties in the prosecutor’s summation did not *404deprive th e defendant of a fair trial in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230; *People v Rosado,*143 AD2d 1061). Bracken, J. P., S. Miller, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.
No. 95-974.

#### Arizonans for Official English et al. *v.*Arizona et al.,

*ante,*p. 43. In this case, the parties shall bear their own costs.
99-0650 (La. 4/23/99)

#### Allen A. TOUCHET v. FIDELITY CASUALTY CO. and Wedge Wireline, Inc.

No. 99-C-0650.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Fidelity Casualty Co.; Wedge Wireline Inc.; — Defendants); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Office of Workers’ Compensation District # 4 Number 97-01876; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CA98-1230

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel.

TRAYLOR, J. would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Linda Reddick, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Avanex Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;



b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this
report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: September 13, 2004             
|                                     
|/s/    LINDA REDDICK                 
|Linda Reddick Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012235EN.01001101.xml

| 4.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 6 June 2012 — Trento Sviluppo Srl and Centrale Adriatica Soc. coop. v AGCM

(Case C-281/12)

2012/C 235/20

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Trento Sviluppo srl, Centrale Adriatica Soc. coop.

Appellants:

Respondent: Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM)

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 6(1) of Directive 2005/29/EC, (1) as regards the part in which the Italian-language version uses the words ‘e in ogni caso’, to be understood as meaning that, in order for the existence of a misleading commercial practice to be established, it is sufficient if even only one of the elements referred to in the first part of that paragraph is present, or that, in order for the existence of such a commercial practice to be established, it is also necessary for the additional element to be present, that is to say, the commercial practice must be likely to interfere with a transactional decision adopted by a consumer?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22).

1

---
No. 73-6739.

#### Costarelli *v.*Massachusetts.

Appeal from Municipal Ct. of Boston. [Probable jurisdiction postponed, 419 U. S. 893.] Motion of Massachusetts Defenders Committee for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 15 

To prohibit the regulation of carbon dioxide emissions in the United States 

until China, India, and Russia implement similar reductions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 2011 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To prohibit the regulation of carbon dioxide emissions in 

the United States until China, India, and Russia implement similar reductions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARBON DIOXIDE REDUCTIONS IN CHINA, 

4 INDIA, AND RUSSIA. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Ad6 ministrator of the Environmental Protection Agency or 

7 the head of any other Federal agency shall not regulate 

8 carbon dioxide emissions until the date on which the Sec9 retary of Commerce certifies in writing that each of the 

10 People’s Republic of China, the Republic of India, and 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 15 IS

1 Russia have initiated measures that require carbon dioxide 

2 emission reductions that are substantially similar to the 

3 carbon dioxide emission reductions proposed for the 

4 United States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 44317.

#### Protests 590220-G, etc., of A. Hirschberger (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
# C_2012235EN.01001701.xml

| 4.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/17

---

Action brought on 15 June 2012 — ZZ v EASA

(Case F-62/12)

2012/C 235/36

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to calculate accredited pension rights acquired before entry into service on the basis of the new General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare unlawful Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare unlawful Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;

| — | annul the decision to apply, to the applicant’s request for transfer of pension rights, the parameters referred to in the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision to apply, to the applicant’s request for transfer of pension rights, the parameters referred to in the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;

| — | order the European Aviation Safety Agency to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Aviation Safety Agency to pay the costs.

---
Exhibit
10.37





ADDENDUM
TO EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT





This
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AND
NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT (this "Addendum"), dated as
of February 18, 2008, is between The Sheridan Group, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the "Employer"), and G.
Paul Bozuwa (the "Employee")
(collectively, “the Parties”).





WHEREAS, the Parties entered
into an Employment and Non-Competition Agreement (the “Agreement”) on or about
April 1, 2007; and





WHEREAS, a question has arisen
between the Parties with respect to the application and duration of §§6(e), 7, 8
and 9 of the Agreement; and





WHEREAS, the Parties wish to
enter into this Addendum to clarify their intent and eliminate any ambiguity
with respect to §§6(e), 7, 8 and 9 of the Agreement; and





WHEREAS, it is the intent of
the Parties that all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue to
remain in full force and effect, subject to the clarification set forth in this
Addendum.





NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby
agreed as follows:





1.           The
above recitals are incorporated herein by reference, and are intended to be
binding upon the Parties.





2.           The
Parties acknowledge and agree that it is the mutual intent of the Parties that
the Employee’s rights and remedies upon termination set forth in §6(e) of the
Agreement apply to the termination at anytime of
Employee’s employment by the Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors and/or
assigns) without Cause pursuant to §6(c) or by the Employee with Good Reason
pursuant to §6(d).  Moreover, it is the Parties’ specific intent that
the Employee’s rights and remedies upon termination set forth in §6(e) will
survive the termination of the Agreement.





3.           The
Parties acknowledge and agree that it is the mutual intent of the Parties that
the Employee’s obligations to the Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors
and/or assigns) set forth in §7 (Inventions; Assignment); §8 (Confidential
Information); and §9 (Non-Competition) of the Agreement apply to the termination
at any timeof Employee’s employment with Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors
and/or assigns). Moreover, it is the Parties’ specific intent that the
Employee’s obligations to the Employer set forth in §7, §8 and §9 will survive
the termination of the Agreement.





4.           The
Parties each acknowledge and agree that this Addendum is supported by the
consideration set forth in the Agreement, which the Parties acknowledge to be
good and valuable.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed as of the date and year first above
written.





THE SHERIDAN GROUP,
      INC.By:
            /s/JohnA.SaxtonJohn A. SaxtonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/G.PaulBozuwaG.
      Paul Bozuwa
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alex Stelmak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
19th day of June 2003.


/s/ Alex Stelmak
------------------------
Chief Financial Officer