alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KPMG [LOGO]

KPMG LLP
Suite 1600
1000 Walnut
P.O. Box 13127
Kansas City, MO  64106




                        Independent Accountants' Consent


Board of Directors
First Kansas Financial Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-81667 and No. 333- 81699) on Form S-8 of First Kansas Financial  Corporation
and  subsidiary of our report dated March 5, 2004  relating to the  consolidated
balance  sheets of First  Kansas  Financial  Corporation  and  subsidiary  as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years then
ended,  which  report  appears in the  December  31, 2003 annual  report on Form
10-KSB of First Kansas Financial Corporation and subsidiary.





                                           /S/ KPMG LLP



Kansas City, Missouri
March 26, 2004


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnerhship, in the U.S.
member firm of KPMG international, a Swiss cooperative.
Before the Second Division,

March 6, 1943

No. 48077.

#### Protest 810786-G of New York Mdse. Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the thimbles, atomizers, powder boxes, and marcel irons, in question were held dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 33.9 following Abstract 29990, *Irving W. Rice Co.*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373), *Viking Trading Co.*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 237, C. D. 132), and Abstract 38680; and the brass base shells were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as parts of articles- having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, following *New York Merchandise Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*(8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607). Protest sustained in part.
No. 74-5874.

#### Bruce *v.*United States.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,515,292
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,347,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,527,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,102,938
<PP&E>                                       4,738,612
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,242,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,057,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,295,973
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,773
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,057,868
<SALES>                                    118,896,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           118,896,655
<CGS>                                       87,909,750
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,283,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               201,676
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             140,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,562,202
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,253,871
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,308,331
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,308,331
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .98


</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 99.4


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Pacific Rim Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas C. Shrake, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)        The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. July 21, 2010
     Thomas C. ShrakeThomas C. ShrakeChief Executive Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Rim Mining Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Rim Mining Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---
ABCI Holdings Inc.
 
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 
 I, Mark L. Baum, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ABCI Holdings Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants certifying officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
 "Evaluation Date"); and
  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.  The registrants certifying officer has disclosed, based on his most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 6.  The registrants other certifying officers have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: August 18, 2004/s/    Mark BaumMark L. BaumCFO
EXHIBIT 32

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: November 30, 2006       By: /s/ Abel Raskas
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  Abel Raskas
                                  President



Date: November 30, 2006       By: /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  Alex Stelmak
                                  Chairman of the Board of Directors
                                  and Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

December 7, 1945

No. 50754.

#### Protest 66934-K of Irving Ross (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items of the merchandise consist of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 49673. Upon the established facts and following the authority cited the claim at 30 percent under paragraph 371 was sustained.
#### Person & Weidhorn *v.*United States

No. 6825.

Entry No. 706535.

Invoices dated London, England, June 26, 1946.

Certified June 28, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 24, 1946.

(Decided January 31, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section ' 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### IN THE MATTER OF FARRAR, a/k/a GREMILLION (two cases).

(Supreme Court Disciplinary Nos. 18, 34)

Jordan, Justice.

The State Bar of Georgia found probable cause to file a complaint against the respondent in Docket No. 18, alleging that the respondent knowingly made a material misrepresentation of fact in connection with his application to take the Georgia Bar examination in that he failed to disclose his previous bar membership in Louisiana and his disbarment in that state.

In Docket No. 34 the State Bar of Georgia brought a complaint against the respondent seeking his suspension from the practice of law pending an appeal of a felony conviction.

In both matters this court appointed a special master who conducted an evidentiary hearing on July 18, 1978. *313The special master made a report of his findings to the State Disciplinary Board and that board made certain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations to this court, the same being docketed in this court on August 22, 1978. The respondent has filed no exceptions to the findings and recommendations of the State Disciplinary Board as provided in Rule 4-219 of Chapter 2, Part IV, Rules and Regulations of the Organization and Government of the State Bar of Georgia.

Decided September 26, 1978.

*John P. Farrar,*pro se.

*James E. Spence, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar.

It appears that the respondent has acknowledged that his conduct in Docket No. 18 is in violation of Standard 1 of the State Bar Rules, and that he desires to withdraw voluntarily from the State Bar of Georgia and from the practice of law in this state.

Pursuant to the recommendation of the State Disciplinary Board, it is ordered that the respondent be excluded from membership in the State Bar of Georgia and that his name be stricken from the rolls of those authorized to practice law in this state.

In view of this order the prosecution in Docket No. 34 is rendered moot.

It is further ordered that the respondent, John Paul Farrar, a/k/a Jack P. F. Gremillion, Jr., may apply for reinstatement of membership in the State Bar of Georgia only upon his compliance with the reinstatement proceedings of the State Bar in effect at the time of his petition for reinstatement.

*It is so ordered.*

*All the Justices concur.*
# C_2015398EN.01001801.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 21 September 2015 — R v S and T

(Case C-492/15)

(2015/C 398/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Respondent and applicant: R

Respondent and applicant:

Applicants and respondents: S and T

Applicants and respondents:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 35(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (1) of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility (Brussels IIa Regulation) preclude a stay, by the appellate court, of proceedings for non-recognition under Article 21(3) of the regulation or for a declaration of enforceability under Article 28 et seq. of the regulation if an application is lodged in the Member State of enforcement for amendment of the judgment on rights of custody of the State of origin which is to be declared enforceable and the Member State of enforcement has international jurisdiction for that application for amendment?

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 9041)

#### W. T. Grant Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 901944-1/2.

(Decided January 3, 1958)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is limited to the merchandise identified on the invoice as friction cars number 160, exported from Germany and entered at the port of New York.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of these so-called friction cars number 160 is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for these articles is “$4.25 per dozen, ex-factory, plus the cost of cartons and packing,” and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Page 1 of 2



## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 13-0795

CITY OF DALLAS, P ETITIONER

V



### .

TCI WEST END, INC., R ESPONDENT



### No. 06-04868-H in the 160th District Court

, Dallas County

BILL OF COSTS

Petition for Review

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Miscellaneous Motion

Miscellaneous Motion

Miscellaneous Motion

Miscellaneous Motion

Miscellaneous Motion

Petition for Review Filed

M/E/T to file Petition $10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$145.00

$10.00 $10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$145.00

$10.00 Paid by City of Dallas

Paid by TCI West End, Inc.

Paid by City of Dallas

Paid by City of Dallas

Paid by TCI West End, Inc.

Paid by City of Dallas

Paid by City of Dallas

Clerk’s Record Unknown Unknown 8 Volumes

Reporter’s Record $7,040.00 Unknown 12 Volumes

Balance of costs owing to the Supreme Court of Texas: 0.00

The City of Dallas shall recover, and TCI West End, Inc., shall pay, the costs

incurred in this Court.Page 2 of 2

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby

certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of the Supreme

Court of Texas, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as

the same appears of record in this office.

with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Austin,

this the 18th day of June, 2015

.

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (3)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November                19, 2007 | By:*/s/*Roger Davis                    |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                              | Roger                Davis             |
|                                              | Chief                Financial Officer |
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of - )

)

Thalle Construction Company )

)

ASBCA Nos. 62500, 62568, 62610

 62892, 62976, 63016

Under Contract No. W912EP-15-C-0002 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Lochlin B. Samples, Esq. 

Karl Dix, Jr., Esq. 

John T. Crowley, Esq.

 Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP

 Atlanta, GA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Kristin M. Bigham, Esq.

Susan E. Symanski, Esq.

Bruce E. Groover, Esq.

Amber R. Jackson, Esq.

James M Zaleski, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorneys

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Jacksonville

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The disputes have been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: March 7, 2023

TIMOTHY P. MCILMAIL

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 62500, 62568, 62610, 62892, 

62976, 63016, Appeals of Thalle Construction Company, rendered in conformance with 

the Board’s Charter.

Dated: March 9, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,023,945
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,871,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                   208,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,636,581
<PP&E>                                         9,188,048
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,189,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 39,692,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,014,281
<BONDS>                                        5,908,584
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       22,478,244
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,880,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   39,692,475
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               25,830,062
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15,399,461
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,861,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             579,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,184,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                   525,198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            659,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   659,413
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .13



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jo S. Major, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Avanex Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Avanex Corporation.



By:

/s/    JO S. MAJOR,
JR.Name:

Jo S. Major, Jr.Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer




I, Linda
Reddick, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Avanex Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Avanex
Corporation.



By:

/s/    LINDA
REDDICKName:

Linda ReddickTitle:

Chief Financial Officer