alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

           AMERICAN AIRCARRIERS SUPPORT, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       Year               Year
                                                                                       Ended             Ended
                                                                                   December 31,       December 31,
                                                                                        1998               1997     
                                                                                   -----------        ------------
 
<S>                                                                                <C>                  <C>        
Pro forma data:

Net income as reported                                                             $ 6,764,609          $ 4,073,355
Pro forma income tax expense                                                         2,570,551            1,629,300
                                                                                   -----------          -----------
Pro forma net income                                                               $ 4,194,058          $ 2,444,055
                                                                                   ===========          ===========


Pro forma basic earnings per share                                                    $   0.76             $   0.60
                                                                                      ========             ========
Pro forma diluted earnings per share                                                  $   0.76             $   0.60
                                                                                      ========             ========

Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding:

                                                                                       5,512,533          4,100,000
                                                                                   =============      =============
    Diluted                                                                            5,517,597          4,100,000
                                                                                   =============      =============


</TABLE>
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 09a0026n.06

Filed: January 14, 2009

Case No. 07-2477

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

NORMAN CHOATE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER

CORP., et al.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF

MICHIGAN

BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH, BATCHELDER, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Norman Choate appeals the district court’s

grant of summary judgment to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) on a claim

for relief under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and an attempted rescission of a General

Release that Choate had entered into with AMTRAK to settle myriad other claims. Choate attempts

to appeal as well the district court’s earlier order, made final by the court’s summary judgment order,

dismissing Choate’s claim against the United Transportation Union Local 138.

We have carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record supplied to us by the parties,

including the two prior lawsuits Choate filed against AMTRAK, and we find no basis upon which

to disagree with the district court’s final judgment challenged in this appeal. We note as well that

Choate’s sparse and cursory argument with regard to the dismissal of his claim against the United

Transportation Union is wholly without merit. The district court’s extending the court-ordered
2

deadline for adding the Union as a party to the First Amended Complaint does not and cannot affect

the underlying statute of limitations for bringing an action against the Union.

As the district court’s opinions correctly set out the law governing the issues raised, and as

Choate offers no basis for reaching a different conclusion, issuance of a full written opinion by this

court would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s

opinion, we AFFIRM the judgment in all respects.
No. 96-796.

No. 96-5996.

No. 96-6205.

No. 96-6287.

No. 96-6589.

No. 96-6678.

No. 96-6787.

No. 96-6864.

No. 96-6904.

#### Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. *v.*Bickel et al., Moore *v.*Roberts, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary, et al., Westley *v.*Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Belcher *v.*Lesley et al., Tumlin *v.*Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al., Stephen *v.*Prunty, Warden, Struve *v.*Park Place Apartments, Brown *v.*Turpin, Warden, Penland *v.*North Carolina,

519 U. S. 1093;

519 U. S. 1093;

519 U. S. 1094;

519 U. S. 1031;

519 U. S. 1080;

519 U. S. 1095;

519 U. S. 1097;

519 U. S. 1098; and

519 U. S. 1098. Petitions for rehearing denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Ceremonies of the Pawnee [electronicresource].**
v.1-pdf|v1-epub|v1-mobi|v.2-pdf|v2-epub|v2-mobi|
 
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.33:27/PT.1-2

Item Number: 0921-A (online)

CGP systemNumber:001063033 
October 29, 2018
(Reap. Dec. 9858)

#### J. Ossola Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 912704.

(Decided November 29, 1960)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Goehrcm Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that this appeal is limited to the fishing rod sets, Item 1073, as listed in the invoice covered by this appeal; that at the date of exportation of the merchandise involved, namely, fishing rod sets, Item 1073, manufactured in and exported from Japan to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value less the buying commission stated in the invoice.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise at the date of exportation thereof as defined in Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

*578On the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the fishing rod sets, item 1073, involved herein, and that such value is the appraised value, less the buying commission stated in the invoice.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 54957.

#### American Oak Preserving Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 154795-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 8, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00821-CV AARON DRAKE, III, Appellant V. KATOHELINE DRAKE, Appellee On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-22-01299 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Carlyle, Smith, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Kennedy This appeal challenges the trial cour t’s November 7, 2022 final decree of divorce. No request for findings of fact or a motion for new trial or modify judgment was timely filed, and the cond itions for a restricted appeal are not met. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due within thirty days of judgment or December 6, 2022.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1(a), 26.3. The notice of appeal was filed August 21, 2023. Because the timely filing of a notice of a ppeal is jurisdictional, we directed appellant to file a letter brief a ddressing the jurisdictional issue. See Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, LLC , 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dallas–2– 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g) (timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Appellant complied. In his le tter brief, appellant assert s details about his marriage with appellee, but does not addr ess our jurisdictional concerns. Because the notice of app eal was untimely filed, we dismiss the appeal and all pending motions for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

230821F.P05 /Nanc y Kenned y/ NANCY KENNEDY JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT AARON DRAKE III, Appellant
No. 05-23-00821-CV V. KATOHELINE DRAKE, Appellee On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-22-01299. Opinion delivered by Justice Kennedy, Justices Carlyle and Smith participating. In accordance with this Court’s op inion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee KATOHELINE DR AKE recover her costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant AARON DRAKE III.
Judgment entered November 8, 2023.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SMITHCO CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Appellant,

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00191-CV

Appeal from the

394th District Court

v. §

of Presidio County, Texas

TIERRA MINING MATERIALS, LLC, § (TC# 7350)

Appellee. §

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant pay all costs of this appeal, and this decision be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Welcome Aboard

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
As some of you may have already noticed, there are some new faces at DLA Land and Maritime.  

17 associates attended the September new employee orientation session.  We can count ourselves fortunate to have been able to hire such high caliber employees.  Please say hello and make them feel welcomed.  

Pictured left to right:

1st row:  Susan Sestito, Dawn Moxley, Sam Wagers, Zachary Chen

2nd row:   John Furgiuele, Jennifer Collins, Jeremy Darby, Kyle Hochevar

3rd row:  Marie Cotter, Brandon Vermilye, Brandon Corbitt

Back row:  Neil Cornett, Don Schulze, Marco Koke

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MNew Employee
No. 74-853.

#### Geraci, Executrix *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Vander Zanden, President and Chief Executive Officer of School Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 24, 2010 (the Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of School Specialty, Inc.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 25, 2010



/s/    David J. Vander ZandenDavid J. Vander ZandenChief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies
this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
No. 96-5723.

#### Miller *v.*Runyon, Postmaster General.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|    |  |                              |  |                                                             
|--- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  | NAME                         |  | STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
|1.  |  | ClassroomDirect.com, LLC     |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|2.  |  | Childcraft Education Corp.   |  | New York                                                    
|    |  |                             
|3.  |  | Bird-in-Hand Woodworks, Inc. |  | New Jersey                                                  
|    |  |                             
|4.  |  | Frey Scientific, Inc.        |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|5.  |  | Sportime, LLC                |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|6.  |  | Sax Arts & Crafts, Inc.      |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|7.  |  | Global Video, LLC            |  | Wisconsin                                                   
|    |  |                             
|8.  |  | New School, Inc.             |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|9.  |  | Premier Agendas, Inc.        |  | Washington                                                  
|    |  |                             
|10. |  | Premier School Agendas, Ltd. |  | Canada                                                      
|    |  |                             
|11. |  | Amalgamated Widgets, Inc.    |  | Wisconsin                                                   
|    |  |                             
|12. |  | Select Agendas, Corp.        |  | Canada                                                      
|    |  |                             
|13. |  | Califone International, Inc. |  | Delaware                                                    
|    |  |                             
|14. |  | Delta Education, LLC         |  | Delaware
Opinion issued February 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00689-CV

———————————

MARKET-TIERS, INC. D/B/A BLUE ENDO, Appellant

V.

TROKAMED GMBH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 243rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2016-60164

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Market-Tiers, Inc. d/b/a Blue Endo, Krista Macumber, and Justin 

Macumber, have filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” No other party has filed a 

notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).
2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. 42.1(a), 

43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10Q FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMTENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         250,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,369,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    63,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,692,000<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,516,000
<PP&E>                                      18,267,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,930,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,853,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,330,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,626,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,127,000<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,853,000
<SALES>                                     18,233,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,764,000
<CGS>                                       16,208,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,208,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             175,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                756,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   306,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            450,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   450,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<FN>
<F1>NET OF LIFO RESERVE OF $2,113,000
<F2>RETAINED EARNINGS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I, Li
Xiangqian,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.





By: /s/ Li Xiangqian
   -----------------------
   Li Xiangqian
   Chief Executive Officer
   February 9, 2006
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 2

- 2431

_____________________________ A NTHONY H OOD , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County

. Russell S. Roberts , Judge

.

December 1, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
B ILBREY , M.K. T HOMAS , and L ONG , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Anthony Hood
, pro se, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
IWC 12-16: Zero-Liquid Discharge System at Progress Energy Mayo Generation 

Station

Matthias Loewenberg, GEA Process Engineering Inc., Columbia, MD 

Progress Energy is currently installing a new Zero-Liquid Discharge treatment system 

for Flue-Gas Desulfurization Waste Water at their Mayo Generation Station in Roxboro 

NC. The system, designed and supplied by GEA Progress Engineering Inc., helps 

Progress Energy’s continuous commitment to provide safe, reliable and environmental 

friendly energy generation. The Zero-Liquid Discharge addition to their existing FGD 

scrubber supports compliance with tight NPDES wastewater discharge regulations. The 

Partial Zero-Liquid Discharge system consists of proven falling film evaporator 

technology with a secondary forced circulation evaporator in order to reduce the FGD 

blow down volume significantly. The resulting concentrated brine will be mixed with 

Plant fly ash and disposed in a new on-site landfill. The distillate water will be used in 

the Plant systems, reducing the make-up water demand. 

Numerous treatment options were considered for this facility, however ZLD was chosen 

based on multi-pollutant removal ability, proven technology, and cost. This paper will 

outline the methodology behind the selection of this Partial Zero-Liquid Discharge 

approach with respect to environmental compliance.