alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.35





ADDENDUM
TO EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT





This
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AND
NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT (this "Addendum"), dated as
of February 18, 2008, is between The Sheridan Group, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the "Employer"), and
Douglas R. Ehmann (the "Employee")
(collectively, “the Parties”).





WHEREAS, the Parties entered
into an Employment and Non-Competition Agreement (the “Agreement”) on or about
April 1, 2007; and





WHEREAS, a question has arisen
between the Parties with respect to the application and duration of §§6(e), 7, 8
and 9 of the Agreement; and





WHEREAS, the Parties wish to
enter into this Addendum to clarify their intent and eliminate any ambiguity
with respect to §§6(e), 7, 8 and 9 of the Agreement; and





WHEREAS, it is the intent of
the Parties that all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue to
remain in full force and effect, subject to the clarification set forth in this
Addendum.





NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby
agreed as follows:





1.           The
above recitals are incorporated herein by reference, and are intended to be
binding upon the Parties.





2.           The
Parties acknowledge and agree that it is the mutual intent of the Parties that
the Employee’s rights and remedies upon termination set forth in §6(e) of the
Agreement apply to the termination at anytime of
Employee’s employment by the Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors and/or
assigns) without Cause pursuant to §6(c) or by the Employee with Good Reason
pursuant to §6(d).  Moreover, it is the Parties’ specific intent that
the Employee’s rights and remedies upon termination set forth in §6(e) will
survive the termination of the Agreement.





3.           The
Parties acknowledge and agree that it is the mutual intent of the Parties that
the Employee’s obligations to the Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors
and/or assigns) set forth in §7 (Inventions; Assignment); §8 (Confidential
Information); and §9 (Non-Competition) of the Agreement apply to the termination
at any timeof Employee’s employment with Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors
and/or assigns). Moreover, it is the Parties’ specific intent that the
Employee’s obligations to the Employer set forth in §7, §8 and §9 will survive
the termination of the Agreement.





4.           The
Parties each acknowledge and agree that this Addendum is supported by the
consideration set forth in the Agreement, which the Parties acknowledge to be
good and valuable.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed as of the date and year first above
written.





THE SHERIDAN GROUP,
      INC.By:
            /s/JohnA.SaxtonJohn A. SaxtonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/DouglasR.EhmannDouglas R. Ehmann
34220.

#### CHERRY v. THE STATE.

Submitted November 14, 1978

Decided November 30, 1978.

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

Appellant was convicted of the murder of his wife and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals and contends that the trial court erred in failing to charge voluntary manslaughter upon request. *State v. Stonaker,*236 Ga. 1 (222 SE2d 354) (1976). We affirm. In our opinion there is no evidence of voluntary manslaughter. The issue was murder or justifiable homicide. *Gregg v. State,*233 Ga. 117, 120 (210 SE2d 659) (1974); *Williams v. State,*232 Ga. 203 (206 SE2d 37) (1974).

Although contradicted by appellant’s confession and the testimony of two of the victim’s children who were present, we relate the essential testimony of the appellant which is most favorable to him but insufficient to support his contention. He testified that he and his wife, the victim, were estranged but he had returned to her residence early one morning to get his clothes; they were in the kitchen, the victim stated she would die and go to hell before he could get his clothes, she reached in a kitchen cabinet and drew out a pistol and pointed it at him, he drew his pistol from his jacket pocket and shot the victim once, she moved several feet and he shot her twice more, he left and surrendered to a deputy sheriff. Appellant testified he shot the victim because she was pointing a pistol at him.

We find the other enumerations of error to be without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Hall, J., who dissents.*

*645
      *W. McMillan Waler,*for appellant.

*Phillip R. West, District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, William B. Hill, Jr., Staff Assistant Attorney General,*for appellee.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6067

SHAWN CRAWFORD ALLEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN JAKE, Acting Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-598)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Dee Morrissey, Jonathan Stanley David, MORRISSEY, HERSHNER

& JACOBS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Linwood Theodore

Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Crawford Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Allen v. Jake, No. CA-97-598

(E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Logistics Operations director retires after 35 years of Navy service

By Beth Reece

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

GriffithretirementOperationsPeople and Culture
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Programs and plans of theNational Center for Education Statistics**
 
1999 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2005
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.302:P 94/5/
Item Number:0461-D-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000818684
 
February 10, 2020
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of Global Realty  Development Corp.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Roger Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  May 24, 2006                      By: /s/ Roger Davis
                                         -------------------
                                         Roger Davis
                                         Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1393 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1393

 To prohibit the enforcement of a climate change interpretive guidance 
    issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 20 (legislative day, July 19), 2011

 Mr. Barrasso introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the enforcement of a climate change interpretive guidance 
    issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maintaining Agency Direction on 
Financial Fraud Act''.

SEC. 2. INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE NULL AND VOID.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no interpretive 
guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission on or after 
the effective date of this Act relating to ``Commission Guidance 
Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change'', affecting Parts 211, 
231, and 249 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations (as described in 
Commission Release Nos. 33-9106; 34-61469; FR-82), or any successor 
thereto, may take effect, and such guidance shall have no force or 
effect with respect to any person on or after February 2, 2010.

SEC. 3. OTHER SEC ACTION PROHIBITED.

    (a) Further Guidance Related to Climate Change.--The Commission may 
not issue any interpretive guidance with respect to disclosures related 
to climate change on or after the effective date of this Act.
    (b) Voluntary Submissions.--The Commission may not issue any 
interpretive guidance that would establish any requirements with 
respect to the content of or format for any disclosures related to 
climate change voluntarily submitted by any entity to the Commission on 
or after the effective date of this Act.
    (c) Civil and Administrative Actions.--No civil or administrative 
action or proceeding pertaining to disclosures related to climate 
change may be initiated by the Commission on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act and any such actions or proceedings pending on 
such date shall be terminated.
    (d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to--
            (1) prohibit the Commission from issuing interpretive 
        guidance with respect to disclosures related to non-
        anthropogenic or natural climate variability observed over 
        comparable time periods; or
            (2) terminate an administrative action or proceeding 
        pertaining to such disclosures.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Mary M. Kabacinski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of School Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 (the Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of School Specialty, Inc.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 7, 2005



/s/ Mary M. KabacinskiMary M. KabacinskiExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies
this Annual report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

 

**Certification of Principal Executive Officerrequired by Rule 13a – 14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act**

** **

I, A.W. Bergeron, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AES Red Oak,LLC;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered byreport;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) [Reserved]

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information and;

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:   November 14, 2003 |                          |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                          |   /s/ A.W. Bergeron |   |
|                                          | A.W. Bergeron  President      |

 

----
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011�1003

Combined Multibeam and LIDAR Bathymetry Data from Eastern Long Island Sound and Westernmost Block Island Sound � A Regional Perspective

----

**Title |   List of Figures  |    Conversion Factors  |    Abstract  |    Introduction  |     Methods |   Bathymetry |  GIS Data Catalog  |     Summary  | Acknowledgments   | References   | Contacts**

----

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey
No. 53225.

#### The Hamburger Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 109833-K/91544, etc. (Chicago).

*334Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Por the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

            Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
                       Title 18 of the United States Code

             I, Clyde Harrison, the chief executive officer of Rogers
             International Raw Materials Fund L.P. certify that (i) the Form 10Q
             fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
             the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
             contained in the Form 10Q fairly presents, in all material
             respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
             Rogers International Raw Materials Fund L.P.

                                   /s/ Clyde Harrison
                                   ------------------
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                      April 29, 2003


            Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
                       Title 18 of the United States Code


             I, Richard Chambers, the chief financial officer of Rogers
             International Raw Materials Fund L.P. certify that (i) the Form 10Q
             fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
             the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
             contained in the Form 10Q fairly presents, in all material
             respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
             Rogers International Raw Materials Fund L.P.

                                   /s/ Richard Chambers
                                   --------------------
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                      April 29, 2003
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 21, 2018

NO. 03-18-00428-CV

Yvonne Brown, Appellant

v.

Coffee Traders, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

REVERSED AND REMANDED—OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court on June 7, 2018. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s order and remands the case to the 

district court for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion. The appellee shall pay 

all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the quarterly report of The Quantum Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald B. Cohen, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: March 23, 2009



| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Donald B. Cohen                       
| | Donald B. Cohen                           
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the smaller reporting company specifically incorporates it by reference.
No. 44286.

#### Protests 735788-G, etc., of Amedeo Cozzi et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.