alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NAVIGANT'S
1998 ANNUAL REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998             DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                             315                   6,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,157                  22,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                       413                     191
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,186                  32,071
<PP&E>                                          31,048                  24,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,479                   6,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,848                 137,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,978                  19,692
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       112,952                  94,100
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,173                   5,544
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,848                 137,861
<SALES>                                        171,368                  90,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,368                  90,917
<CGS>                                           99,734                  52,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,889                  82,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,236                   1,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,813                     256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,430                   6,521
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,987                   2,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,443                   3,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,443                   3,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19                    0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18                    0.32
        

</TABLE>
March 24, 1975*

No. 74-977.

#### Rosenthal *v.*Board of Education of Central High School District No. 3 of the Town of Hempstead et al.

*

MR. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:

> No. 74-374, *Times-Picayune Publishing Cory.*v. *Schulingkamp, infra,*this page; No. 74-706, *Pacelli*v. *United States, infra,*p. 995; No. 74-749, *Art Theatre Guild, Inc.*v. *Parrish, infra,*p. 995; No. 74-5499, *Carter*v. *Lee, infra,*p. 995; No. 74-5706, *Orange*v. *North Carolina, infra,*p. 996; No. 74-5741, *Hardwick*v. *Caldwell, infra,*p. 996; No. 74-5810, *May*v. *United States, infra,*p. 996; No. 74-5815, *Murphy*v. *United States, infra,*p. 996; No. 74-5855, *Wright*v. *United States, infra,*p. 997; and No. 74-5942, *Brown*v. *Estelle, infra,*p. 996.

Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                             SUBSIDIARIES OF VLASIC
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY AND NAME
UNDER WHICH IT DOES BUSINESS                       JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------------------------                       -----------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>
Aligar, Inc.                                                    Delaware
Deleco Grosshandels GmbH                                        Germany
Cargal, Inc.                                                    Delaware
Freshbake Foods Limited                                      Great Britain
Theodor Kattus GmbH                                             Germany
Stratford-Upon-Avon Foods Limited                            Great Britain
Swift-Armour Sociedad Anonima Argentina                        Argentina
VF Brands, Inc.                                                 Delaware
Vlasic Farms, Inc.                                                Ohio
Vlasic Foods Distribution Company                               Arkansas
Vlasic Foods Canada, Inc.                                       Ontario
Vlasic Foods, Inc.                                              Michigan
Vlasic International Brands Inc.                                Delaware
Vlasic International Sales Inc.                                New Jersey
Vlasic Standards, Inc.                                         New Jersey
</TABLE>
No. 47028.

#### Protest 75552-K of Wing Woh Chong Hing Kee Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of drugs, sliced, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph •34 was sustained.
(V. D. 67)

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 951639, etc.

(Decided February 17, 1958)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States,*38 Cust. Ct. 478, Abstract 60675, and it has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above remands of protest consists of Microscopes and Parts and Wooden Cabinets, containers for said microscopes'and parts, which were the subject of a judgment and decision by the First Division of this Court in the case of *Manca, Inc.,*v. *United States,*Abstract 60675, on April 24, 1957, wherein it is stated “* * * and remand the matters, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, U. S. C. § 2636 (d), for further proceedings before a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the imported merchandise in the manner provided for by law.”

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States were as follows:

> *628Remand of protest 274523-K/l 9567-54

> United

> States Invoice

> Less dollars discount each Entry No. price Merchandise each

> 25% $201.99 951639_ 6 Phase Contrast equipments for $269.32 Ortholux PHECS.

> 3. 60 6 Cases_ 4. 80 to

> 199. 89 4 Phase Contrast Equipments for 266. 52 B-stand PHAYM. to

> 25% 3.60 4 Cases_ 4. 80

> Remand of protest 275024r-K/20143-54

> 25% 502. 38 974087_ 1 Polarizing Microscope SY with 669. 84 optical outfit IIOGZ-IIVQL-IITBK.

> 25% 19. 32 1 Cabinet_ 25. 76

> Remand of protest 273196-K/10205-55

> 192. 15 WH 898_ 5 Polarizing Microscopes HIM_ 256. 20 to Cu

> 13. 65 5 Cases_ 18. 20 to Cn

> 348. 60 777381_ 1 Microscope Ortholux 50/76 with 464. 80 equipment with binocular combination tube OLHIM, without transformer REDYX. to Cu

> 25% 13.65 1 Cabinet EEVIB_ 18. 20

> Remand of protest 274177-K/l 1360-55

> 25% 188. 04 977143_ 5 Microscopes Dialux 46/-Model L 250. 72 KAELK.

> 5 Cabinets.__21.00 25% 15.75

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above remands of protest may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and I hold such dutiable value for each of the articles to be as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 74-659.

#### Capra et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9645)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 6086, etc.

(Decided March 22, 1960)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*George Gochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated on the attached schedule have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value on or about the dates of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by Minami Sangyo Co. Ltd. invoices and/or Nanri Trading Co. Ltd. invoices embraced by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was, as defined in Section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, the f.o.b. invoice prices exclusive of buying commission as stated on the invoices herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Reap-praisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are limited to Minami Sangyo Go. Ltd. invoices and/or Nanri Trading Go. Ltd. invoices and abandoned in all other respects.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for merchandise such as or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Reap-praisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered *623by the Minami Sangyo Co., Ltd., and/or the Nanri Trading Co., Ltd., invoices embraced by these appeals and that such value is the f.o.b. invoice prices, exclusive of buying commission, as stated on the invoices.

As to all other merchandise and in all other respects, the appeals, having been abandoned, will be dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2013079EN.01000302.xml

| 16.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (Debrecen, Hungary) v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (Budapest, Hungary)

(Case C-489/12)

2013/C 79/05

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (Debrecen, Hungary)

Applicant:

Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (Budapest, Hungary)

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Can Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that that provision is intended to guarantee the possibility of a legal remedy only for unlawful and unjustified dismissal? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that that provision is intended to guarantee the possibility of a legal remedy only for unlawful and unjustified dismissal?

| 2. | Does that provision mean that an employer is bound to provide the employee with reasons in writing on dismissal and the dismissal will then not be unjustified? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does that provision mean that an employer is bound to provide the employee with reasons in writing on dismissal and the dismissal will then not be unjustified?

| 3. | Does failure to communicate reasons in itself make the measure unlawful or may the employer state reasons subsequently in the course of any employment litigation? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does failure to communicate reasons in itself make the measure unlawful or may the employer state reasons subsequently in the course of any employment litigation?

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0157

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

IOLA MAERRIEA JOHNSTON

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 15, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 9 2023

01/09/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0157
No. 46428.

#### Protest 46163-K of Burns Lumber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protest was therefore sustained.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# WRP gives supervisors pool of qualified candidates to fill workforce gaps, build stronger teams

By Beth Reece

Managers and supervisors at DLA Aviation can learn more about the WRP during information sessions scheduled for Feb. 22 and April 8 and at Disposition Services Feb. 28.  

A video about the DLA WRP is available here.

For more information, contact WRP@dla.mil.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

WRPDisabilitiesWorkforce Recruitment ProgramEEOintern
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Union Security and Checkoff Provisions in Major Union Contracts, 1958-59

              																	Theodore, Rose. 						*Union Security and Checkoff Provisions in Major Union Contracts, 1958-59 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1272*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										March 1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4548,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Johnny P. BARBIER v. L & M BO-TRUC RENTAL, INC. and David Duet.

No. 98-C-0921.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 8, 1998.

*57In re Barbier, Johnny P.;—Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “H”, No. 93-20230; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97CA-1743.

Denied.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
# C_2012250EN.01000902.xml

| 18.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 4 June 2012 — Samantha Elrick v Bezirksregierung Köln

(Case C-275/12)

2012/C 250/16

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Samantha Elrick

Applicant:

Defendant: Bezirksregierung Köln

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Articles 20 and 21 TFEU preclude a rule of national law according to which a German national who has her permanent residence in Germany and attends an educational establishment in a Member State of the European Union is refused a study grant under the Bundesausbildungsförderungsgesetz (BAföG) in respect of her attendance at that foreign educational establishment because the educational course attended abroad is of only one year’s duration, whereas she could have received a study grant under the BAföG for comparable studies in Germany, which would also have lasted for one year?

---
No. 96-5823.

#### Jensen *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Jonathan B. Hill

+1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM October 1 4 , 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act

and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam:

On June 18, 2015 a request for Section 333 exemption was submitted on behalf of PINC

Aerial (“ PINC ”) , that request was assigned File No. FAA

- 2015

- 3238

- 0001. We have since found

that the email address of the application, Matt Yearling, Chief Executive Officer of PINC, listed

on page 2 of the submission is incorrect. The correct email address is

myearling@pincsolutions.com . We request that your records be updated to reflect the correct

email address.

Sincerely,

Jonathan B. Hill

Cooley, LLP

Counsel for PINC Aerial Productions, Inc.

cc: William Crozier

Robert Pappas

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith

Dan Ngo
No. 48182.

#### Protest 92628-K of J. L. Hammett Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the plasticine passed upon in Abstract 47147, the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.
EXHIBIT 99.1





May 20, 2002





Securities
and Exchange Commission


Judiciary Plaza


450
Fifth Street, N.W.


Washington, DC 20549





Re:    Arthur Andersen LLP





Ladies and Gentlemen:





Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Arthur Andersen
LLP has represented to us the following regarding the audit of our consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2002:





The audit was subject to Arthur Andersens quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards; that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit; and that there was sufficient availability of national office
consultation and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen.





| | Sin | cerely,
| | --- | -------




| | Bri | o Software, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------




| | /s/ | Craig Collins
| | --- | -------------




| | Cra | ig Collins,
| | --- | -----------

| | Ex | ecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------