CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1 (Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 459 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended August 25, 2011

Rule Title(s): Automotive, Mobile Equipment, and Asso ciated Parts and Components Coating Operations (New Rule Title)

Date Submitted to ARB: 12-15-11

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): October 2, 1997

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Kevin J. Williams Phone Number: (916) 874-4851 E-mail Address: kjwilliams@airquality.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The adopted amendments incorporated t he requirements from CARB's 2005 Suggested Control Measure for Automotive Coatings. The adopted amendments also incorporated the requirements of the U.S. EPA 2008 Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings that are applicable to operations within the scope of this rule, such as the requirements for transportation plastic parts coatings and

motor vehicle materials.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 (CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Ca tegory: The Sacramento Regional 8-hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan (Plan) included a commi tement to reduce VOC emissions from automotive coating operations by 0.11 tons per day. The Plan also included a commitement to reduce VOC emissions from solvent cleaning and degreasing operations by 0.59 tons per day. Prior to the am endments of this rule, the District had amended nine rules and reduced 0.53 tons per day from solvent cleaning and degreasing operations, leaving a shortfall of 0.06 tons per day. Although Rule 459 was not identified in the solvent cleaning/degreasing control

measure, the additional reductions from the amendments to Rule 459 will meet this commitment in the Plan.

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions : 2018 Area Affected: Sacramento County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2 (Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: Inventory numbers shown ar e 2018 SIP inventory (2002 base year). For non-aerosol automotive coat ings, the 2018 inventory is 0.86 tons VO C per day. The 2018 inventory total for solvent cold cleaning, vapor degreasing, wipe cleaning, and thinning and cleanup for coatings and printing is 2.21 tons VOC per day. The District estimates that 0.28 tons per day of that total is a ssociated with solvent use in automotive coating operations.

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for t he Control Measure: 0.11 tons per day in 2018

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): 0.52 t ons per day in 2018 for automot ive coatings and 0.18 tons per day from solvent cleaning and degreasing operati ons related to automotive coating operations

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 302

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : None

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 301, 302, 303, 310.3, 310.4, 310.5, 310.7, and 311 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: using emission control equipment (Section 305) as an alternative to meeting the coating limits in Sections 301, 302, and 303, as applicable.

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 301, 302, 303, 305, 310.3, 310.4, 310.5, 310.7, and 311 Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 306, 310.1, and 310.2 Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 401, 402, 501, 502, and 503 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): NoneCALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3 (Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: Reduces VOC emissions and contributes to reasonable further progress and attainment of the ozone

standard.