alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

109°00"

R101 W

Prepared in cooperation with the

U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and the

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

39°15"

T10S

OPEN-FILE REPORT 99-453

Location of Data-Collection Sites in the Grand Valley, West-Central Colorado—PLATE 2
Butler. D.L., and Osmundson. B.C., 2000, Physical, chemical, and biological data for the Uncompahgre Project Area and the Grand Valley, west-central Colorado, 1993-98

108° 15° R97 W

Row

Base from U.S. Geological Survey 1:100,000 Quadrangles:
Delta, 1980; Grand Junction, 1981; Westwater, 1980 TUS

Generalized extent of irrigated area of
Grand Valley Project (Study area
extends beyond line)

47/1 pata-collection site on streams or
ditches

@ DP pata-collection site associated with
ponds, backwater areas, or bottomland
areas:

mest

39°00'

MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF DATA-COLLECTION
SITES INTHE GRAND VALLEY AND EXTENT OF
IRRIGATED AREA, WEST-CENTRAL COLORADO

Gabby ey
fang 7
il

eek

* Blows | |

SCALE 1:100 000

2

3

1

5

°

1

2

3

i

a

——————

4
=

__ SKILOMETERS

CONTOUR INTERVAL 50 METERS
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929

5 MILES
1

COLORADO

MAP LOCATION

T.108.

TUS.

T128.

39°00"
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Physicians Capital, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William B. Cheeseman Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




/s/ William B. Cheeseman
---------------------------------------
William B. Cheeseman
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002
#### Ascot, Ltd. (Globe Shipping Co., Inc.) et al. *v.*United States

No. 6515.

Entry No. 721393, etc.

Invoices dated London, England January 1945, etc.

Certified January 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 14, 1945, etc.

(Decided November 14, 1946)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof,, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
----

**EXHIBIT 14.1**

***CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS***

 We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement  on Form S-8 dated October 21, 2002, of Pacific Rim Mining Corp. (the “Company”),  of our report dated May 28, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements  of the Company which appear in the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed for the  fiscal year ended April 30, 2004. 

 STALEY, OKADA & PARTNERS 

 Chartered Accountants 

**“Staley, Okada & Partners”**

 Surrey, British Columbia, Canada 

 August 18, 2004

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Land and Maritime recieves recognition for winning the 2017 Commander in Chief's Installation Excellence Award

By Michael L. JonesDLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Navy Rear Admiral Michelle Skubic, DLA Land and Maritime commander, accepts legislative recognition resolutions from State Senator Kevin Bacon and Representative Richard Brown during a meeting of the Columbus Region Defense Group. 

The recognition honors DLA Land and Maritime winning the 2017 Commander in Chief’s Installation Excellence Award. 

Included in the photo from left are: Dan Bell, Defense Supply Center Columbus site director, Griff Warren, DLA Land and Maritime chief of staff and far right is Land and Maritime Deputy Director, Steve Alsup.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Stories

Land and Maritime receives award for installation excellence

Defense Supply Center Columbus recognized for installation excellence 

Ohio Lt. Governor visits the Defense Supply Center Columbus

DLA L&MCommand L&MCINCMWR L&MProcess Management L&MCulture L&M
### SERVED: MARCH 14, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS ,_:.' i!o 

### J l 3**/~,** 

### q: 5

## .i

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF CORNERSTONE AVIATION, INC. FAADOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1293 ERRATA The docket number in the previously served March 13, 2013, Order Granting Request for Continuance is incorrect.

Attachment: Service List

# ~('~~ · Richard C. Goodwin

Administrative Law JudgeSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001 ONE COPY Susan J. Horstman, ChiefExecutive Officer_ Cornerstone Aviation, Inc., Respondent 337 North 2370 West #130 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 TEL: 801-355-2244 FAX: 801-355-2754 Kyle Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office oftheRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2011-1293 (Civil PenaltyAction)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Honeywell HFO-1233zd High-Volume PlantLarge Scale Plant in Baton Rouge On-Line May 2014•Today:World class, large scale plant in US up and running•Underway:Planning / Engineering on second large scale plantHoneywell HFO-1234ze High-Volume PlantLarge Scale Plant in Baton Rouge Operational in Q3 2014•Today:World class, large scale plant in US completed construction•Underway:Commissioning and start-up on schedule for Q3Solstice®Propellant ApplicationsApplicationCurrentPropellantHFO-1234zeFeasibilityHFO-1234zeCommercializedCommentsDusters HFC-134a, HFC-152a MS-222L1; TS-1580-10S2; Falcon“Dust-Off”; Chemtronics “Typhoon”Tire Inflators HFC-134a1 customer with shelf-ready product;2 customers in evaluationCleaners/Defluxers HFC-134a,152a / HC3 MS-H0805A1; MS-H1212A1Personal Care HFC-152a / HC Hair Spray, Deodorant, Dry Shampoocurrently in customer evaluationPet Care – Trainers HFC-134a Products available in EUNovelty HFC-134a Products available in EUBug Freezer HFC-134a Products available in JapanSpray Adhesives HCCurrently in customer evaluationPharma/Medical OTC HFC-134a 1 customer launch; 1 productcurrently in customer evaluationLaw Enforcement/Safety HFC-134aCurrently in customer evaluationSmoke Detector Testing HFC-134a / HC HSI PurCheckTM launched1Miller Stephenson2Techspray3Hydrocarbons – Propane/ButaneWidespread Applicability Across Multiple End-Use SegmentsSupermarket RefrigerationProduct Capacity Efficiency GWPR404A100% 100% 3943R407A90% 100-105% 1923Honeywell OfferingsR407F100% 105-110% 1674N-40(*R448A)100% 105-110% 1273*Provisional ASHRAE # 

# R407F and N40 significantly reduce lifetime CO 2 

# emissionsAssumptions:•Direct Expansion (DX) design (majorityusage in existing stores) / 3,000 poundrefrigerant charge / 15% leak rate•$100k energy consumption per year for baseline refrigerantExample Store SavingsPer store Vs. R404A Vs. R407AGWP Energy GWP EnergyR407F 2269 10% 249 5%N-40 2670 10% 650 5%Per 1,000 stores Annual Savings vs.R404AAnnual Savings vs.R407Amt CO2Energy mt CO2EnergyR407F 463,145 $10M 50,825 $5MN-40 544,977 $10M 132,677 $5MHoneywellHoneywellGlobal Trials – Performax LT 

# Performax LT installed in hundreds of supermarkets globallyHoneywell ConfidentialGlobal Trials - HFO Blend N40 

# Supermarket trials underway in the US and EUSolsticeTM 1234yf – Commercial ProgressProven Safety• March 2014, EU JRC conclusively found1234yf to be safePerformance• Via rigorous testing at the Society ofAutomotive Engineers (SAE), HFO-1234yfproven to deliver same performance asincumbent 134aCustomer Adoption• 1M+ cars have adopted globally• 2M+ cars will have adopted by end of 2014SolsticeTM1234yf vs. 134a & CO205001,0001,500R-134a HFO-1234yf(HoneywellTechnology)CO2(CompetingSolution)

AC related CO 2 e emissions (vehicle lifetime)Similar Performance to 134a...and~30%LowerEmissionsvs. CO2Superior Environmental PerformanceGWP1234yf < 1134 1,430 

# HFO1234yf The Optimal Replacement For 134a
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134985 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134985 

 COA: 270538 

Allegan CC: 03-013251-FC 

WILLIAM JASON WRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
No. 44279.

#### Protests 487689-G, etc., of Millinery Clearing House (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is bodies, hoods, f.orms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.
No. 55549.

#### Chas. H. Demarest, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 159395-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
#### Betty J. LANNES v. DENNY’S, INC. d/b/a Denny’s Restaurant.

No. 98-C-2866.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re Lannes, Betty J.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. 498-603; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 98-CA-0417.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
#### ENZO BIOCHEM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and Becton Dickinson and Company, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-1570.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 17, 2005.

Before LOURIE, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

Enzo Biochem files an unopposed motion to reinstate this appeal,

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The mandate is hereby recalled and the appeal is reinstated.

(2) The case is returned to the original merits panel.

(3) No new filing fee wül be required.

(4) The appeal will be decided without further oral argument, based on the briefs already filed and the previous oral arguments.
No. 65779.

#### Davies Turner & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 206259-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal magnetos and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ronco Corporation*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 253, C.D. 2184), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 13, 2008 | /s/                Harvey B. Grossblatt |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                   | Harvey                B. Grossblatt     |
|                                   | Chief                Executive Officer  |
|                                   |                                    |
|                                   | /s/                James B. Huff        |
|                                   | James                B. Huff            |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer  |

----
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 8039.

Entered at New York, N. Y.

Entry No. 716707, etc.

(Decided August 17, 1951)

*Sharretts, Hillis*& *Paley (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the -defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated above, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised value less the amount added in each instance to meet advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases and that such or similar merchandise was not offered for sale or sold in the country of exportation for home consumption.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that these appeals to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value in each instance was the appraised value less the .amount added in each instance to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certification**

 

The certification set forthbelow is being submitted in connection with the quarterly report on Form 10Qfor the period ending March 31, 2005 (the “report”) to the Securities andExchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”) and 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002.

 

A. W. Bergeron, thePresident and Thomas P. Keating, the Chief Financial Officer of AES Red Oak,L.L.C., each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.                                       the report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       the informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of AES Red Oak, L.L.C.

 

 
|   |   /s/  A.W. Bergeron     |   |
|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: A.W.  Bergeron               |
|   | President                          |
|   |                               |
|   |                               |
|   |   /s/  Thomas P. Keating |   |
|   | Name: Thomas P.  Keating           |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer           |

 

 

Date:  May 13,2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to AES Red Oak, L.L.C., and will be retained by AES Red Oak,L.L.C., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
No. 74-5826.

#### Oxidean *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case No. 13,376.

#### Case of STERN.

[6 Int. Rev. Rec. 87.]

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Sept. 12, 1867.

Bankruptcy — Petition to Annul — Assignment of Claims.

In bankruptcy.

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

A petition was duly verified by oath, having been presented to, and filed in this court by said bankrupt, setting forth that on the 11th of July, 1867, he filed a petition in bankruptcy in this court; that on the 16th of July, 1807, he was duly adjudicated a bankrupt under the bankruptcy act of March 2, 1S67 [14 Stat. 517]; that on the 2d day of September, 1867, Mr. John Sedgwick was duly appointed assignee of his estate; that all the creditors named in Schedule A, filed in his petition, have made assignments of their claims against him to one Morriz Stem; that all such creditors have been paid and satisfied by said Morriz Stern; that said Morriz Stern having thus become sole creditor of said bankrupt, has released him from all claims, demands and liabilities by a deed of release executed by him to said bankrupt, and dated the 9th day of September, 1SG7, a copy of which deed is annexed to said petition, — and praying that the said adjudication in bankruptcy against him may be annulled upon *1310his giving such notice to the creditors set forth in said schedule, as this court may direct, or upon such other terms and conditions as this court may deem reasonable and just.

Now, on motion of Edwin James, Esquire, attorney for said petitioner, it is hereby ordered that the said creditors, and all other creditors of said bankrupt, and the said as-signee, and all other persons interested, show cause before this court in bankruptcy, on the 1st day of October, 1867, at 11 a. m., in the court-room of this court in the city of New York, why the prayer of said petition shall not be granted; and it is further ordered that a copy of this order be served personally or through the post-office, postage prepaid, upon each of the said creditors whose debts are set forth in said schedule, and also a copy thereof personally upon said assignee at least ten .days before the return day aforesaid; and that a copy of this order be published once in each week for two successive weeks in the New York Daily Times and the New York Commercial Advertiser, the last publication to be at least five days e afore said return day.