alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013026EN.01002601.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Tivoli (Italy) lodged on 7 November 2012 — Antonella Pedone v Maria Adele Corrao

(Case C-498/12)

2013/C 26/50

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Tivoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Antonella Pedone

Applicant:

Defendant: Maria Adele Corrao

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 130 of Presidential Decree No 115 of 30 May 2002 on legal aid in Italian law — insofar as it stipulates that amounts payable to the defending council, the auxiliary to the judge and the court legal assessor are to be reduced by half — comply with Article 47(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which stipulates that legal aid is to be made available to those who lack sufficient resources insofar as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 130 of Presidential Decree No 115 of 30 May 2002 on legal aid in Italian law — insofar as it stipulates that amounts payable to the defending council, the auxiliary to the judge and the court legal assessor are to be reduced by half — comply with Article 47(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which stipulates that legal aid is to be made available to those who lack sufficient resources insofar as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice?

| 2. | Does Article 130 of Presidential Decree No 115 of 30 May 2002 on legal aid in Italian law — insofar as it stipulates that amounts payable to the defending counsel, the auxiliary to the judge and the court legal assessor are to be reduced by half — comply with Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, as transposed into Community law by Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and by Article 6 [TFEU]? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Article 130 of Presidential Decree No 115 of 30 May 2002 on legal aid in Italian law — insofar as it stipulates that amounts payable to the defending counsel, the auxiliary to the judge and the court legal assessor are to be reduced by half — comply with Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, as transposed into Community law by Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and by Article 6 [TFEU]?

---
No. 74-5969.

#### Nugent et ux. *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 53822.

protest 146379-K (New York).

#### Alltransport, Incorporated *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial the memorandum of the collector and the papers in the case were admitted in evidence. The special report of the surveyor, attached to the entry, admitted error in measuring the marble, recommending that the invoice measurements were more correct. The collector’s office agreed that the consular invoice measurements of each block be taken as the actual measurements and by computation this would be 1,238 cubic feet for the importation. In view of the evidence presented the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry, assessing duty at the 65-cent rate under paragraph 232 upon the basis of 1,238 cubic feet.
# C_2014253EN.01006702.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/67

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 25 June 2014 — Sumberaz Sotte-Wedemeijer v Europol

(Case F-119/12) (1)

1

((Staff cases - Europol Staff - Europol Convention - Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees - Decision 2009/371/JHA - Application of the CEOS to Europol agents - Non-renewal of a fixed term contract as a member of the temporary staff - Refusal to grant a fixed term contract as a member of the temporary staff))

2014/C 253/94

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stephanie Sumberaz Sotte-Wedemeijer (Voorburg, Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (represented initially by D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents, and then by J. Arnould, D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of Europol not to renew the applicant’s contract for an unlimited duration and for Europol to be ordered to pay the applicant the difference between the remuneration which she could have continued to receive at Europol and any other compensation that she actually received

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Ms Sumberaz Sotte-Wedemeijer is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay those incurred by the European Police Office. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Ms Sumberaz Sotte-Wedemeijer is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay those incurred by the European Police Office.

---

(1)  OJ C 379 of 08/12/2012, p. 36.

1

---
#### STATE of Missouri, ex rel. John Jacob JOST, Doine L. Jost and Propagators Jost, Ltd., Relators/Respondents, v. CITY OF DES PERES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Respondent, John R. Barsanti, Nancy Lee Barsanti, Thomas R. Weber, Suzanne Weber, John D. Clark and Susan Clark, Intervenors/Appellants.

No. 73253.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

May 19, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 30, 1998.

Application for Transfer Denied Nov. 24, 1998.

Donald U. Beimdiek, St. Louis, for appellant.

James A. Borchers, St. Charles, for Jost.

Kevin M. O’Keefe, St. Louis, for Des Peres.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barsanti, et al. (Barsanti), appeals from judgment entered by the trial court reversing a decision of the Board of Adjustment (Board) of the City of Des Peres (City) in favor of State of Missouri, ex rel. John Jacob Jost, et al. Barsanti was not a party to the action from which he appeals. Nevertheless, on appeal, Barsanti contends the court erred *351in: (1) denying the post-judgment motion to intervene after the court reversed the decision of the Board; and *(2) reversing*the Board’s affirmation of City’s Notice to Abate the expansion of the non-conforming use. Barsanti’s third point sets forth the duties of this court in regard to this review.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KURT L. HUDSON
, Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , as trustee for J.P. Mortgage

Acquisition Trust 2006

- WF1; EMILIO VALLS, TERESITA VALLS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACROPOLIS PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, INC., McCORMICK POWER, INC., HUGINS CONSTRUCTION CORP., AK CONSTRUCTION & REMODELING, INC, GLO TEL, INC.

, and HILLSBORO LEBARON CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS, INC.
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D17

- 1177

[ April 11, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Joel T. Lazarus

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 2015CA019042 (11)

.

Kurt L. Hudson, Chicago, IL, pro se.

Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg T raurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and M. Hope Keating and Karusha Y

. Sharpe of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee U.S. Bank National Association.

P ER C URIAM

.

This is an appeal of a final judgment of mortgage foreclosure. While appellant was the original mortgagor, appellant lost the property in a foreclosure action by his condominium association for unpaid condominium assessments. He was joined in the appellee bank’s foreclosure complaint because he w as the maker of the note. The only
reli ef the bank sought was foreclosure of the mortgage and a deficiency if the proceeds of sale were insufficient to cover the mortgage. Only the request for deficiency constituted a request for relief against appellant, as appellant’s interest in the propert y had already been foreclosed. The appellant raised several affirmative defenses, but we conclude that they
did not establish meritorious defenses to the foreclosure after he was no2 longer the owner of the property. Appellant did allege that Wells Fargo collected fraudulent monthly inspection fees and late charges, which he paid, but which violated the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C., section 1961, and related state laws. If his defense is meritorious, it is a claim which is personal to him which he can
assert as a set

- off against any cl aim for a deficiency judgment.

For these reasons we affirm the final judgment of foreclosure.

W ARNER , C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 96-7881.

#### Morales *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Pension Plans Under Collective Bargaining : Normal Retirement, Early and Disability Retirement, Fall 1959

              																	Kolodrubetz, Walter W. (Walter William). 						*Pension Plans Under Collective Bargaining : Normal Retirement, Early and Disability Retirement, Fall 1959 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1284*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										February 1961,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4559,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 43168.

#### Protests 825860-G, etc., of Greenberg & Josefsberg et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallingee, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20) certain of the paperweights in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. Paperweights plated with silver were held dutiable at 50 percent under the same paragraph.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 442nd AES aerial porters 'move the fight'

By Staff Sgt. Christopher Stoltz386th Air Expeditionary Wing Public Affairs

                CAMP TAJI, Iraq  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

442nd Air Expeditionary Squadroncargofoodfueltransportation
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 15

- 00733

- CV

THE CITY OF HELOTES ; Tom Schoolcraft, in his capacity as Mayor of Helotes; Rick Schroder, in his capacity as Helotes City Administrator; and Ernest Cruz, in his capacity as Head of the Helotes Development Services Department, Appellants

v.

TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUILDERS and The Greater San Antonio Builders Association, Appellees

From the 407th Judic ial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 07817 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Marialyn Barnard , Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 7, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED
On April 29, 2016, appellants filed a motion to abate this appeal pending a determination

in Town of Lakewood Village v. Bizios , which was, at the time, pending before the Texas Supreme

Court in cause number 15

- 0106. Appellee filed a response opposing the abatement. Because one
or more of the issues pending in the appeal before this court were similar to the issues pending in

the Bizios appeal , on May 1 7, 2016, this court granted the motion to abate , withdrew the appeal

from submission , and f or administrative purposes treated this appeal as a closed case. On May 27,04

- 15

- 00733

- CV

- 2

- 2016, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bizios ; and on July 8, 2016, the c ourt iss ued its

mandate.
On August 26, 2016, appellants filed an unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal in this court

. The motion is granted. This appeal is hereby reinstated on this court’s docket and the appeal is

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9340]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5125-N-20]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 18, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-
7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: May 10, 2007.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E7-9340 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
No. 55573.

#### Mennella Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 169177-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chestnuts similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Naumes Forwarding Service*v. *United States*(24 Cust. Ct. 93, C. D. 1214), the-claim for free entry under paragraph 1646 was sustained.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ARM IDA R IVER

A, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. R EC ONTR

UST C OM PANY, NA, a wholly owne d subsidia

ry of B ank of Am e ric a , NA; e t a l ., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 12-16474 D.C . No. 2:11-c v-01695-KJD-PAL M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da Ke nt J. Da

wson, Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 17, 2015 * * B e fore : O’ SC ANNLAIN, LEAVY, a n d FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. A r m i d a R i v e r a a p p e a l s p r o s e f

r o m t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s j u d g m e nt d i s mi s s i n g h e r a c t i o n a r i s i n g f r o m f o r e c l o s u r e p r o c e e d i n g s . W e h a

v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u

n d e r 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e a ffirm . 

# FIL ED FEB 27 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

dism i ssing R

ive ra ’ s a c tion on the ba sis of judic ia l e stoppe l be c a use R ive ra ’ s position in he r c o m pla int is c le arly inc onsiste nt with he r state m e nt in theba nkruptc y c ourt, a nd the ba nkruptc y c ourt a c c e pte d he r prior position in gra nting he r a

disc ha rge . Se e Hamilton v . State Farm Fire

& C as. C o. , 270 F.3d 778, 782-83 (9th C i r. 2001) (se tting forth the sta nda rd of re vie w a

nd e xpla ining thedoc trine of judic ia l e stoppe l). Ac c e pting R ive ra ’ s c urre nt, inc onsiste nt position would provide he r with a

n unfa ir a dva

nta ge in light of the

ba nkruptc y disc ha rge . Se e id. at 782 (“ Judic ia l e stoppe l is a n e quita ble doc trine tha

t pre c lude s a

pa rty from ga ining a

n a dva n ta ge by a sse rting one position, a

n d the n late r se e king a

n a dva nta ge by ta king a c le a rly inc onsiste nt position.” ). AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 1 6 4 7 4 2
#### Robert Lee BICKHAM, et al. v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 98-CC-0898.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 8, 1998.

In re Westinghouse Electric Corp.;—Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 70,760; 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 72,154; 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 72,986; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW98 0014.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Technologies Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), the
undersigned, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: December 14, 2009

                                             /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Alex Stelmak
                                             Chief Executive Officer,
                                             Chairman of the Board and
                                             Chief Financial Officer