alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE  FISCAL  YEAR ENDED  FEBRUARY  29,  2000,  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                          42,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,311
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,311
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,894
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,000
<COMMON>                                         1,120
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,703)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,311
<SALES>                                          2,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,034)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,034)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William C. Robinson, CEO, Chairman and Principal Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.


By: /s/ William C. Robinson
    -----------------------
    William C. Robinson
    CEO, Chairman and Principal Executive Officer

    December 2, 2005
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report of Caneum, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB/A-2 for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date:September 27, 2007   /s/ Suki Mudan Suki Mudan, President  (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 53282.

#### Distillers Brands, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 749477-G, etc. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2014

p0917 

# Order

Clerk September 24, 2014

148678

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICH IGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148678

COA: 316576

Genesee CC: 99

- 004796

- FC

NATHAN GENE REID,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. In the Court of Appeals, the defendant

sought leave to appeal two orders of the Genesee Circuit Court, both dated December 21,

20 12. The Court of Appeals docketed the defendant’s delayed application for leave to

appeal as an appeal only from the December 21, 2012 order denying the defendant’s

motion for the production of documents, and then denied leave to appeal for lack of merit

in the grounds presented. With regard to this ruling, leave to appeal is DENIED, because

we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. It

does not appear that the Court of Appeals reviewed the defendant’s challenge to the other

circuit court order. Accordingly, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave

to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of that part of

the defendant’s delayed application for leave to appeal that sough t leave to appeal the

December 21, 2012 order of the Genesee Circuit Court denying, under MCR 6.502(G),

the defendant’s motion to rescind or revoke or vacate his plea.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Case No. 6,918.

#### HURD v. WILLIAMS et al.

[4 McLean, 239.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Michigan.

June Term, 1847.

Practice at Law — Continuance—Motion,

A motion made at one term but not decided at that term, nor continued to the next one, the court will order a continuance nunc pro tunc, but will not require the other party to take up the motion at the term. He had a right to suppose, that as the motion was not continued, it had been abandoned.

[This was an action at law by E. Hurd against Williams and Hunt.]

Mr. Emmons, for plaintiff.

Mr. Davidson, for defendants.

OPINION OF THE COURT. A motion was made at the last term in this case, to set aside a sale on execution. The motion was not continued, and the defendants’ counsel objects to taking it up, on that ground. The court directed a continuance to be entered nunc pro tunc, but held that the defendants’ counsel was not bound to take up the cause at the present term, as the motion was not continued regularly from the last term. The defendants’ counsel had a right to suppose, as the motion was not continued, it had been abandoned.
#### MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellant, v. Jacqueline Farquhar MEYERS, et al., Appellees.

No. 98-87.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 19, 1999.

*508Robert A. Ginsburg, Miami-Dade County Attorney, and Thomas A. Tucker Ron-zetti and Scott D. Fabricius, Assistant County Attorneys, for appellant.

Robert J. Bryan; Podhurst, Orseck, Jo-sefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin *&*Perwin, P.A., and Joel Perwin, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J, and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The County appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in a negligence action. For the following reasons, we reverse the order denying the County’s Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict and remand with directions for the trial court to enter final judgment in favor of the County.

Section 768.28(7) of the Florida Statutes provides that “[I]n actions brought pursuant to this section, *process shall be served*upon the head of the agency concerned and also ... upon the Department of Insurance .... ” (emphasis added). § 768.28(7), Fla. Stat. (1995). In this case, the plaintiff did not serve process upon the Department of Insurance. The County raised the lack of service of process as an affirmative defense; moved for a directed verdict; and moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The defense was therefore properly raised and preserved for review.

Because the plaintiff did not serve process on the Department of Insurance, the County was immune from suit, and the trial court erred in denying the County’s motion for a directed verdict. *See Metropolitan Dade County v.*Braude, 593 So.2d 563, 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (holding that where County asserted defense of lack of service upon the Department of Insurance, the trial court erred in denying the County’s motion for a directed verdict). Because the lack of service of process is dispositive, we do not reach the other issues on appeal.

Reversed and remanded with directions to enter judgment for the County.
** Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of MathStar, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2006 (the“Quarterly Report”), I, Douglas M. Pihl, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Quarterly Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.     The informationcontained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

May 15, 2006
|   | By     |                                   |   /s/ Douglas M. Pihl |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|   |   | Douglas M. Pihl                        |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|        |        |                                        |                                 |  |

 

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Healthy Scoops for Healthy Troops

By Sgt. Brianna GaudiAlaskan NORAD Region/Alaskan Command/11th Air Force

                FORT GREELY, AK  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSONCombat Logistics Regiment 25Arctic Edge 18Arctic EdgefoodSubsistenceMREsFort Greely
S. 1639 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

An Act 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to authorize the American Legion under 

its Federal charter to provide guidance and leadership to the individual departments and posts of the American Legion, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL POWER OF AMERICAN LEGION UNDER FEDERAL CHARTER. 

Section 21704 of title 36, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraph (5) through (8) as paragraphs (6) through (9), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph (5): 

‘‘(5) provide guidance and leadership to organizations and 

local chapters established under paragraph (4), but may not 

control or otherwise influence the specific activities and conduct 

of such organizations and local chapters;’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
### California hydrography

By: Joseph Barlow Lippincott

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp81

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# March New Employee Orientation

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The DLA Land and Maritime New Employee Orientation will be held Wednesday, March 28 in Building 20, Buckeye Room, from 9 am - 3 pm and continue Thursday, March 29, from 9 a.m. - 2 p.m.

Starting a new job can be confusing and stressful. During orientation there will be presentations from various organizations that will provide guidance and support to help you become acclimated to your organization and embrace your new career. 

New associates from all local DLA hosted tenants, military and interns are welcome to attend.The training is mandatory and held the last Wednesday and Thursday of every month. Attendance is tracked and reported. 

If you have any questions, please email the program manager or call 614-692-6824.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCulture L&Mnew employee L&MCommunity L&MResource the Enterprise L&M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Nos. 333-80415 and 333-80409 of Factual Data Corp. on Forms S-3 and
the registration statement Nos. 333-92693 and 333-80101 on Forms S-8 of our
report dated February 1, 2002, appearing in the annual report on Form 10-K of
Factual Data Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2001.




                                            /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                                BDO Seidman, LLP

April 15, 2002
Denver, Colorado
No. 44269.

#### Protest 931042-G of Milnor, Inc. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

From the evidence it was found that the dolls in question are purchased by adults to be used as representative of Japan in displays of dolls from different countries. The doll in question stands on a pedestal attached to a base. It is not used by children as a toy doll. It appeared that the component material of chief value is artificial silk, which is not one of the products provided for in paragraph 31 but is covered by schedule 13. The protest was overruled.
#### Louis A. FERRARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 04-4769.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Sept. 21, 2005.

Louis A. Ferrara, Brooklyn, New York, for Appellant, pro se.

Thomas A. McFarland, Assistant United States Attorney (Varuni Nelson, Beth P. Schwartz, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief), for Roslynn R. Mauskopff, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, New York, for Appellee.

PRESENT: MINER, RAGGI, Circuit Judges, and KARAS,1 District Judge.

1

. The Honorable Kenneth M. Karas, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

*393SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the district court’s judgment, dated July 8, 2004, and entered on the docket on July 12, 2004, is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-appellant, Louis Ferrara, who was found guilty after a 1989 jury trial on conspiratorial and substantive charges of cocaine trafficking, was sentenced on September 14, 1990, to a 151-month term of incarceration, a total of five years of supervised release, a $25,000 fine, and a $100 special assessment. He now appeals from the 2004 denial of his motion to remit the imposed fine, asserting that the district court erred in concluding that it lacked authority to grant the requested relief when, in fact, 18 U.S.C. § 3588(e)(2) permitted it to do so. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and prior proceedings, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision.

Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure restricts a district court’s ability to reduce a lawfully imposed sentence to circumstances not present in this case. Title 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2), nevertheless, confers jurisdiction on district courts to “modify, reduce, or enlarge the conditions of supervised release.” *United States v. Balon,*384 F.3d 38, 47 (2d Cir.2004) (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Ferrara’s judgment of conviction imposes concurrent supervised release terms of three and five years, but it does not specify that payment of the ordered $25,000 fine constitutes a special condition of that supervision. Under these circumstances, even if the district court had been inclined to remit Ferrara’s fine—which Judge Dearie made clear he was not— § 3583(e)(2) did not empower it to grant that relief.

The July 8, 2004 judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 96-7861.

#### Wooten *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9048)

#### Burt Seiden *v.*United States

Entry No. 876686.

(Decided January 9, 1958)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

It is provided by the rules of the court that, in such an instance, after the opposite party has had an opportunity to present evidence on the issues, the case may he decided by the court on the record before it.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the present appeal for a reappraisement and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.