alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Magnetic survey and geology of the Stager area, Iron County, Michigan

By: Stanley E. GoodF.J. Pettijohn

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir55

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
s 

0 50 100 Miles 

c:J California Air District boundary (with label) 

~ Great Basin Valley Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

- Lake County Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

Lake Tahoe Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

- Metropolitan Los Angeles Air Quality Control Region 

- Mountain Counties Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

- North Central Coast Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

North Coast Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

- Northeast Plateau Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

Sacramento Valley Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

- San Diego Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

- San Francisco Bay Area Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

l _j San Joaquin Valley Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

South Central Coast Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

Southeast Desert Intrastate Air Quality Control Region 

San Joaquin 

Valley 

Unified 

Santa Barbara 

........ ..,..... ~-Ventura 

.. 

Santa• 

Barbara 

Ventura South 

' 

Mojave 

Des en 

Imperial 

& EM 

AIR QUALITY CONTROL REGIONS 

AND AIR DISTRICTS IN CALIFORNIA REGION t - AIR 

AIR1400060_Lmxd (June 30, 2014) 

Soui"C.es: Titl e 40, Part 8 1, Subpart B. Electronic Code of Federal Regulation s (June 30, 2014), EPA (2014). TANA (2006)
**Exhibit** **23.4**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE**

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Mannatech, Incorporated

We have audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) the consolidated financial statements of Mannatech, Incorporated and subsidiaries referred to in our report dated March 16, 2007, which is included in the annual report to shareholders and included in Part II of this form. Our audits of the basic financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15 for 2006, which is the responsibility of the Company’s management. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas

March 17, 2008
# C_2013026EN.01002602.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Tivoli (Italy) lodged on 7 November 2012 — Elisabetta Gentile v Ufficio Finanziario della Direzione Ufficio Territoriale di Tivoli and Others

(Case C-499/12)

2013/C 26/51

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Tivoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elisabetta Gentile

Applicant:

Defendants: Ufficio Finanziario della Direzione Ufficio Territoriale di Tivoli, Fabrizio Penna, Gianfranco Di Nicola

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 130 of Presidential Decree No 115 of 30 May 2002 on legal aid in Italian law — insofar as it stipulates that amounts payable to the defending council, the auxiliary to the judge and the court legal assessor are to be reduced by half — comply with Article 47(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which stipulates that legal aid is to be made available to those who lack sufficient resources insofar as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice?

---
#### Floyd DARBY v. James LeBLANC, Warden Major Gilbert Price, Richard Slack.

No. 98-C-2694.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re Leblanc, James Wdn.; Price, Major Gilbert; Slack, Richard; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. “M”, No. 420,046; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA98 0706.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., not on panel.

VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would grant the writ.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF 10-K REPORT**

**OF**

**NAVIGANT INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

**FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 2002**

 

1.    The undersigned are the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Navigant International, Inc. (the “Company”). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-K Report of theCompany for the year ended December 29, 2002. 

 

2.    We certify that such 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-K Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

This Certification is executed as of March 27, 2003. 

 

/s/ Edward S. Adams 

 

Edward S. Adams, 

Chief Executive Officer 

 

/s/ Robert C. Griffith 

 

Robert C. Griffith, 

Chief Operating Officerand Chief Financial Officer
12-1 

12.0 Determination of the Adequacy of the Existing Plan

Depending on the findings of the five-year progress report, New York State is 

required to take one of the actions listed in 40 CFR Section 51.308(h) as 

presented below that apply to non-Class I states. The findings of the five-year 

progress report, which will be based on consultation with Class I states to which 

New York sources are contributory as well as the FLMs and the EPA, will 

determine which action is appropriate and necessary. 

List of Possible Actions – 40 CFR Section 51.308(h) 

1. If, after consultation with affected Class I states, FLMs and EPA, New 

York determines that its existing SIP requires no further substantive 

revision at this time in order to achieve its share of the emission 

reductions needed to reach the established goals for visibility 

improvement and emissions reductions, the Administrator will be provided 

a negative declaration from New York that further revision of the existing 

SIP is not needed at this time. 

 2. If a Class I state determines that the existing SIP is or may be inadequate 

to ensure reasonable progress due to emissions from sources in New 

York, New York will collaborate with the other state(s) through the regional 

planning process for the purpose of developing additional strategies to 

address New York’s SIP deficiencies if this is required. 

Class I states are additionally required to revise their SIPs: 

1. If a Class I state determines that its existing SIP is or may be inadequate 

to ensure reasonable progress due to emissions from sources within the 

Class I state, such deficiencies must be addressed within one year, or 

2. If a Class I state determines that its current SIP is or may be inadequate to 

ensure reasonable progress due to emissions from sources in another 

country, it must notify the Administrator and provide with all pertinent, 

available information.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1692-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New York (FEMA-1692-DR), dated April 24, 2007, and related determinations. 

# DATES: 

*Effective Date:*                         May 3, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New York is hereby amended to include the Public Assistance program for the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 24, 2007: 

Orange, Rockland, and Westchester Counties for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance.) 

Albany, Columbia, Dutchess, Essex, Greene, Putnam, Schoharie, Suffolk, and Ulster Counties for Public Assistance. 

Albany, Dutchess, and Richmond Counties for Individual Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

 [FR Doc. E7-9257 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
No. 65726.

#### Kane Import Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 60/26539 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
#### United States *v.*J. L. Hammett Company

No. 7713.

Entry No. 720396.

First Division, Appellate Term

(Order dated July 8, 1949)

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General *(Richard F. Weeks,*special attorney), for the appellant, against the motion.

*Eugene B. Pickrell (Michael Stramiello, Jr.,*of counsel) for the appellee, for the ■motion.

Before Oliver, Cole, and Mollison, Judges

ORDER

Upon reading and filing the appellee’s motion, that the application for review filed by the United States, appellant herein, be dismissed, .and upon reading and filing the memoranda of the parties herein in support of and in opposition to said motion, upon careful consideration thereof and of the record in the matter,

It Is Hekeby Ordered, Adjudged, and Deceeed that the aforesaid motion be and the same is hereby granted, and that the application for review filed by the United States, appellant, be and the same is hereby dismissed.
No. 42080.

#### Petition 5656-R of American Hawaiian Music Academy (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It appeared that the petitioner entered the merchandise at a value which he knew was far less than he paid for the instrument and he made no effort to ascertain the foreign or export value thereof. The petition was therefore denied.
**Exhibit 10.1**

----

**Consent      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-16927, No. 33-90398, No. 333-59981, No. 333-57266, No. 333-104065, and No. 333-118579) of Reuters Group PLC of our report dated 7 March 2005 relating to the financial statements of Reuters Group PLC which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2004.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers    LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers    LLPLondon, England

7 March 2005

----
Before the Second Division,

August 30, 1939

No. 42026.

#### Protests 84541-G, etc., of Gimbel Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel filet laces similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces like those passed upon in *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and embroidered articles and embroidered-net handkerchiefs similar to the merchandise the subject of *Pustet*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and *United States*v. *Ramig*(17 C. C. P. A. 365 T. D. 43809) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.
#### Penny WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-57186.

D.C. No. CV 01-08865 MMM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 13, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 19, 2005.

Esther R. Sorkin, Ball *&*Yorke, Ventura, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil *&*Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before GRABER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL, District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Jeremy Fogel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM***

The district court did not err in denying White’s motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Although the district court denied the motion because it determined that White had not shown good cause for relief, it also was correct in its observation that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction with respect to White’s underlying claims. *Jerves v. United States,*966 F.2d 517, 519 (9th Cir.1992).

White contends that the district court committed reversible error because it raised the issue of subject matter jurisdiction *sua sponte*and without giving her an opportunity to be heard. However, “[w]hile a party is entitled to notice and an opportunity to respond when a court contemplates dismissing a claim on the merits, it is not so when the dismissal is for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.” *Scholastic Entm’t, Inc. v. Fox Entm’t Group, Inc.,*336 F.3d 982, 985 (9th Cir.2003) (citation omitted). In any event, White has had a full opportunity to brief the jurisdictional issue in connection with the present appeal.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited by or to the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EPA R eg . No

. 79630-1

Vol. 2
No. 56725.

protests 639264—G, etc. (New York).

#### B. B. Dorf & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*496Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# SIDEBAR: Innovation Pilot Projects

By Sara Moore

**Software-Defined Networking****J6 Wiki****DLA Blip****Guest Wireless****Using the Local Cache for Remote Locations****J6 Peer On-the-Job Training****Tiger Teams****Employee 360°****Employee Task Tracker**

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Stories

Employee contest yields ideas, projects to improve IT service

sidebarideasProcess ExcellenceinnovationJ6technologypilot projectcontest
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 28, 2021

No. 04-21-00137-CV

IN RE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Relator

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

The petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief are DENIED. 

It is so ORDERED on April 28, 2021.

_____________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of April, 2021.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CI23861, styled Alpizar v. Travelers Indemnity Insurance Company of 

America, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales

presiding.
#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States

No. 6156.

Invoices dated Antwerp, Belgium, January 12, 1940, etc.

Certified January 13, 1940, etc.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., February 9, 1940, etc.

Entry No. 6846, etc.

(Decided May 30, 1945)

*Philip Stein*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the court:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeals listed on the ■attached schedule A consists of cut diamonds exported from Belgium; that the unit values stated in the invoices, without the addition of buying commission, represent the prices at the various dates of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to ®il purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the *433usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States; and that there were no higher foreign market values at the dates of exportation thereof.

> 2. It is further stipulated that the merchandise and the issue covered by the appeals listed in the attached schedule are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issue the subject of the decisions in Reappraisement Appeal 134305-A, etc., of *J. Seiler, Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 5699, and Reappraisement Appeal 133919-A, etc., of *W. X. Huber Co. et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 6052.

> 3. It is further stipulated that the record in said cases, Reap. Dec.’s 5699 and 6052, may be incorporated in the record in this case, and that it be deemed submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the invoice unit values.

' Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 99.2
                              C.F.O. CERTIFICATION



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Optimum Source International,  Ltd.
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Jeffrey Jackson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



 /s/ Jeffrey Jackson
---------------------
Jeffrey Jackson
Chief Financial Officer
October 14, 2002



<PAGE>