alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11


                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                   COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SECURITY

                      (in thousands, except per share data)


                                                                 Twelve-month
                                                                 period ended
                                                               December 31, 2002
                                                               -----------------

Net income                                                        $   32,894
Less:  preferred securities dividend requirement                      38,690
                                                                      ------
Net loss applicable to common securities                          $   (5,796)
                                                                      ------
Securities:
Weighted average number of common securities outstanding              53,011
                                                                      ------
Net loss per common security                                      $  (109.34)
                                                                     -------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of China Media Networks International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Brian Lesperance, President and Treasurer (principal executive officer and
principal accounting and finance officer)of China Media Networks International, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2006



/s/ Brian LesperanceBrian LesperancePresident and Treasurer(principal executive officer and principal accounting and finance officer)
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION

I, Craig I. Forman, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of JCK Legacy Company; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

​

| 3                        | ​    Chief Executive Officer

​                                                     |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: September 29, 2020 | /s/ Craig I. Forman

Craig I. FormanPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |

​

----
**Exhibit 13.1**

----

Back to Contents

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Thomas Henry Glocer, Chief Executive of Reuters Group PLC (the “Company”) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     a)  The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     b)  The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

| Dated: 23 March 2004  | By/s/  | Thomas H. Glocer                  |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                       |   |                              |
|                       |   | _____________________________     |
|                       |   | Thomas H. Glocer  Chief Executive |

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana in the Interest of Dylan ROBINSON v. Matthew SIMS.

No. 98-CJ-2958.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re Sims, Matthew; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 31333-JAC; Parish of Ouachi-ta, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 14,200.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# AFLCMC NDI goes digital on aircraft inspections: saves money, improves operations for Air Force

By John Harrington 88th Air Base Wing Public Affairs

*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Nondestructive InspectionLife Cycle Management CenterWright-Patterson Air Force Baseinspection
(Reap. Dec. 9441)

#### American Roland Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. WH-79991.

(Decided June 2, 1959)

*Eugene R. Piolcrell*for the plaintiff.

*George GoclvranDoub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement lias been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement, consists of Pas Sodium, a coal-tar product, which was appraised on the basis of an American selling price, as defined under the provisions of Section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and subject to duty thereunder by reason of Paragraph 28(c) of said Act.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the American selling price on the date of exportation (July 11,1958) for said Pas Sodium, as defined under the provisions of Section 402(g) of said Act, is $1.90 per lb., net weight, less 1% packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal for re-appraisement is abandoned as to any other merchandise listed on the invoice, and this appeal may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved, and that such value for the item of merchandise involved in this appeal, at the time of exportation, is $1.90 per pound, less 1 per centum, net packed. The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2014253EN.01006801.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/68

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 25 June 2014 — Coutureau v Europol

(Case F-120/12) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Europol staff - Europol Convention - Europol Staff Regulations - Decision 2009/371/JHA - Application of the CEOS to members of the staff of Europol - Non-renewal of a fixed–term contract as a member of the temporary staff - Refusal to grant a contract for an indefinite period as a member of the temporary staff))

2014/C 253/95

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Christèle Coutureau (Rijswijk, the Netherlands) (represented by: J.-J. Ghosez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (represented by: initially, D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, Agents, then J. Arnould, D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul Europol’s decision not to renew the applicant’s contract for an indefinite period and an application to order Europol to pay the difference between the remuneration which she could have continued to receive at Europol and any other damages which she actually received.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Coutureau to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Coutureau to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 8/8/2012, p. 36.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-521

In Re: CHARLES EVANS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-56-BR)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Evans, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Evans filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking

this court to compel the district court to dispose of his habeas

corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Act of Apr.

24, 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Law. Co-op. Advance Sheet June 1996).

Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny

mandamus relief because the district court in the Western District

of North Carolina has disposed of the case. Accordingly, the mandamus petition is moot. Additionally, we deny Petitioner's motion to

appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
No. 46388.

#### Protests 57529-K, etc., of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the tennis rackets in question were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502, following *May*v. *United States*(T. D. 47760) and *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 48573). It was also stipulated that the fur dogs in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 41823. The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 1519(e) was therefore sustained as to these articles.
----

**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. §1350,   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Rim Mining  Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended April 30,  2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), I, F. John Norman, Chief Financial Officer of the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

                   (1)           The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934; and 

                   (2)           The information contained  in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company. 

*A signed original of this written statement required by  Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

----
Exhibit 32.1





STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This
certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the
United States Code and shall not be relied on by any other person for any other
purpose.





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Internap Network Services
Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, James P. DeBlasio, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies that







·
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and·
            information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.




Date:
April 30, 2008




/s/ James
      P. DeBlasioJames
      P. DeBlasio
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
|**CONSENT
            OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
        We hereby consent
            to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
            on Forms S-8 (No. 33-16927, No. 33-90398, No. 333-5998 and No. 333-57266)
            of our report, dated 24 February 2003 relating to the financial statements
            which appear in the 2002 Annual Report, to the shareholders of Reuters
            Group PLC on Form 20F for the year ended 31 December 2002.
        **/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers****PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP**
        Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors
        London, England
        18 March 2003
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case Wo. 8,674.

#### M'CALL v. TOWERS.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 41.] 2

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Oct. Term, 1801.

Writs — Notice to Take Deposition — Affidavit.

The affidavit of service of a notice by leaving it with tile defendant's wife, need not state that the wife was informed of the purport of the notice.

Tbe notice to take a deposition was delivered to the defendant’s wife, at his dwelling-house. It was objected that tbe affidavit of service did not state that the wife was informed of tbe purport of the notice.

THE COURT

adjudged tbe notice to be good. Laws A'a. (Rev. Code, 230, c. 141).
**Exhibit** **23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Mannatech, Incorporated:

 

We have issued our reports dated March 16, 2007, with respect to the 2006 consolidated financial statements and March 17, 2008, with respect to Schedule II for 2006 included in the Annual Report of Mannatech, Incorporated and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Mannatech, Incorporated and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-72767, effective February 22, 1999; File No. 333-77227, effective April 28, 1999; File No. 333-94519, effective January 12, 2000; File No. 333-47752, effective October 11, 2000; File No. 333-113975, effective March 26, 2004; and File No. 333-153199, effective August 26, 2008).

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas

March 17, 2008
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00256-CR

Eli Blue Hernandez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-13-200700, HONORABLE CLIFFORD BROWN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Eli Blue Hernandez pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of a

controlled substance, cocaine, and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. The district court 1

has certified that this is a plea-bargain case, the defendant has no right of appeal, and the defendant

has waived the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed

Filed: June 21, 2013

Do Not Publish

Contemporaneously, Hernandez pleaded true to allegations in a motion to adjudicate guilt 1

in trial court cause number D-1-DC-10-206973, the appeal of which has been separately docketed

under appellate cause number 03-13-00255-CR. That appeal remains pending at this time.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011�1003

Combined Multibeam and LIDAR Bathymetry Data from Eastern Long Island Sound and Westernmost Block Island Sound � A Regional Perspective

----

## Summary 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1357 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1357

 To exempt National Forest System land in the State of Alaska from the 
                    Roadless Area Conservation Rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2011

  Mr. Begich (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exempt National Forest System land in the State of Alaska from the 
                    Roadless Area Conservation Rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION RULE EXEMPTION.

    The Roadless Area Conservation Rule established under part 294 of 
title 36, Code of Federal Regulations (and successor regulations), does 
not apply with respect to any National Forest System land in the State 
of Alaska.
                                 <all>
```
| (1)    |   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    |   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Suki      Mudan                                                                             Suki      Mudan, President and Chief Operating Officer |   |   |
| (Principal      Executive and Financial Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |   |
#### Hugh C. Edmiston *v.*United States

No. 6507.

Entry No. 720069, etc.

Invoices dated Birmingham, England.

Certified November 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y. January 4, 1944, etc.

(Decided November 13, 1946)

*B. A. Levett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 39153.

#### Protests 929709-G, etc., of Swiss Trading Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Perseverance Import Corp.*v. *United States*(T. D. 49290) the protests were sustained.