alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 001 3 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ELIZABETH MARGARET HOSCHOUER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 23, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 17 2023

07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0013
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Summary and analysis of the ...highway diesel fuel pre-compliance reports [electronic resource].**
 
2003 | 2004
 
SuDoc Number: EP 6.67:

Item Number:0484-E-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000834565

 
July 16, 2018
Exhibit 12



CERTIFICATION



I, Stan Bharti, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Desert Sun Mining Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d -15(f)) for the company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,

to ensure that material information relating to the company, including

its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within

those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is

being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such

internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our

supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability

of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for

external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and

procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the

effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end

of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control

over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the

annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to

materially affect, the companys internal control over financial

reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or

operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record,

process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other

employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control

over financial reporting.



Date: October 24, 2003



Stan Bharti____________

Chief Executive Officer
English Translation of Agreement dated as of May 31, 2006



 Exhibit 10.24 
 English Translation 
 AGREEMENT 
 Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. (“Yuhuan”) 
 Zhejiang Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd.
(“Zhejiang Yuhuan”) 
 Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. (“Yuhui”) 
 This Agreement is entered into by and among Zhejiang Yuhuan, Yuhui and Yuhuan through friendly negotiation with respect to the settlement of account to the date of
May 31, 2006: 
  

	1.	Since Yuhuan owes RMB 2,100,000 to Yuhui and Yuhui owes RMB 800,000 to Yuhuan, it is agreed by Yuhuan and Yuhui that the net balance of such debt shall be RMB 1,300,000 after
set-off of debts; 

  

	2.	Yuhui owes RMB 6,320,226.13 to Zhejiang Yuhuan as a price for purchasing houses; 

  

	3.	It is agreed by all parties that Yuhui will assign its creditor’s right of RMB 1,300,000 against Yuhuan to Zhejiang Yuhuan, which shall be used to discharge some of the price
for purchasing houses owing to Zhejiang Yuhuan; 

  

	4.	Upon execution of this Agreement, all parties shall make adjustment to their accounts respectively in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement as follows:


  

	(1)	The receivables and payables between Yuhuan and Yuhui as mentioned in Article 1 above have been completely settled. 

  

	(2)	Yuhui still owes to Zhejiang Yuhuan a sum of RMB 5,020,226.13 as the price for purchasing houses, and Yuhui agrees to pay the remaining amount before the due date as specified in
the Contract for Transfer of Real Estate and Land signed by Yuhui and Zhejiang Yuhuan; 

  

	(3)	The amount owed by Yuhuan to Zhejiang Yuhuan increases RMB 1,300,000. 

  

	
	 Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. (Seal)

	
	 Authorized Representative:










	
	 Zhejiang Yuhuan Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. (Seal)

	
	 Authorized Representative:

	
	 Zhejiang Yuhui Solar Energy Source Co., Ltd. (Seal)

	
	 Authorized Representative:


 May 31, 2006
Before the Third Division,

May 15, 1950

No. 54328.

#### The Glemby Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 121918-K (New York).

Johnson, Judge:

This action involves the duty assessed by the collector upon 66 gross and 3)4 dozen artificial silk hair nets out of case numbered 30. The plaintiff claims that said hair nets were not landed in the United States. Although all of the regulations attending short shipment had been complied with, the collector was not satisfied that the alleged short-landed goods were not actually landed in the United States.

At the trial, Vincent J. Cerio, truck driver for the Package Express, Inc., testified on behalf of the plaintiff that he received case numbered 30 at the Baker & Williams bonded warehouse; that the case was received by him in very good condition; and that he delivered it directly to the Glemby Company’s warehouse.

Abraham L. Melik, employed by the plaintiff, testified he is the factory manager in charge of shipping and receiving; that he checks the quantities of goods in cases upon their receipt against the original quantities on the invoice in order to certify the invoice for payment; that the case in question was opened in his presence an hour after arrival at the plaintiff’s place of business and he found therein 16 boxes of artificial silk hair nets; that 12 of the boxes were in good shape and 4 were in a “banged up condition”; that the 12 boxes in good condition each contained 40 gross, but in the 4 damaged boxes there was a shortage of 66 gross in all; and that the missing hair nets were not with other goods covered by the entry and were never received by the plaintiff.

The witnesses of the plaintiff have failed to trace the case in which shortage is claimed from the time it was discharged from the vessel and a permit of delivery accepted by the customs authorities until it reached the place of business of the importer. It will be noted that the truck,driver testifying herein carried the goods from a warehouse to the importer’s place of business. The truck driver who picked the ease up at the pier and took it to the warehouse did not testify. All of the testimony before the court was before the collector in the form of affidavits.

From a consideration of the record as a whole this court is- of opinion that evidence has not been produced sufficient to establish that the missing hair nets were not landed in the United States, nor do we believe that the presumption of correctness of the action of the collector has been overcome.

Judgment will therefore be entered in favor of the Government.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

                     FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL 1999
                     ---------------------------------------



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Norma B. Carter, until December 31, 1999,
their true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and revocation, for them and in their name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to sign Vlasic Foods International Inc.'s Form 10-K Annual
Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended
August 1, 1999, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and
agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact and agent may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



                         VLASIC FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC.
                         -------------------------------




Signature                             Dated as of October 5, 1999
---------                             ---------------------------



/s/ Robert T. Blakely                 /s/ Donald J. Keller
-----------------------------         -----------------------------
    Robert T. Blakely                     Donald J. Keller



/s/ Robert F. Bernstock               /s/ Lawrence C. Karlson
-----------------------------         -----------------------------
    Robert F. Bernstock                   Lawrence C. Karlson



/s/ Morris A. Cohen                   /s/ Shaun F. O'Malley
-----------------------------         -----------------------------
    Morris A. Cohen                       Shaun F. O'Malley



/s/ Tristram C. Colket, Jr.
-----------------------------
    Tristram C. Colket, Jr.
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Ben
      Jamil, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      February 15, 2008


/s/
                Ben
                JamilBen
                  Jamil, Chief Executive Officer
No. 62121.

#### Frederick H. Giesler *v.*United States,

protests 237031-K, etc. (Nogales).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32



Section 1350 Certifications





I, Tren B. Watson, certify that this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Southern Heritage Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Southern Heritage Bancorp, Inc.







|s/Tren B. Watson__________________________________
President and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: March 26, 2004
|--------------------

I, C. Ricky Stowe, certify that this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Southern Heritage Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003 containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Southern Heritage Bancorp, Inc.





|s/C. Ricky Stowe____________________________________
Chief Accounting Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: March 26, 2004
|--------------------



<PAGE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Premium Pay for Night, Weekend, and Overtime Work in Major Union Contracts

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Premium Pay for Night, Weekend, and Overtime Work in Major Union Contracts : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1251*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										June 1959,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4538,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32.1


             Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated
(the "Company") certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

..    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
     September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



Date:   November 10, 2004
                                      /s/ John W. Peters
                                      ____________________________________
                                      John W. Peters
                                      Principal Executive Officer
                                      Principal Financial Officer
No. 47659.

#### Protest 42182-K of Edwin R. Wakefield (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Dali.inger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
#### ANTIN-QUEALY, INC. v. WTA MARINE, INC.

No. 99-CC-0952.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 4, 1999.

JjjPER CURIAM. *

Writ granted. On plaintiffs application, we exercise our supervisory jurisdiction to correct an erroneous ruling by the trial court, granting defendant’s exception of improper venue.

Plaintiff, Antin-Quealy, Inc., is a Louisiana corporation domiciled in Tangipahoa Parish. Plaintiff entered into two contracts with defendant, WTA Marine, Inc. (“WTA”), a corporation domiciled in La-fourche Parish. The contracts were negotiated by mail, phone and fax. They were executed by plaintiff in Tangipahoa Parish, and by defendant in Lafourche Parish.

Subsequently, plaintiff filed the instant suit in Tangipahoa Parish, seeking declaratory relief regarding the contracts. WTA filed an exception of improper venue, arguing that Tangipahoa Parish was not the proper venue for this suit.

After a hearing, the trial court granted WTA’s exception of improper venue, and transferred the case to Lafourche Parish. Plaintiff filed an application for supervisory writs, and the court of appeal denied the writ, finding the trial court’s ruling was correct. WTA then applied to this court.

In *Jordan v. Central Louisiana Electric Co., Inc.,*95-1270 (La.6/23/95), 656 So.2d 988, we addressed a situation where a contract was executed in more than one parish. We construed La. Code Civ. P. art. 76.1 as authorizing venue in any of the parishes in which the contract was executed.

In the instant case, it is undisputed that the contract was executed by WTA in Lafourche Parish and by plaintiff in Tangi-pahoa Parish. Tangipahoa Parish is therefore a proper venue for the suit under La.Code Civ. P. art. 76.1. Moreover, since Tangipahoa Parish is the parish of plain*624tiff’s domicile, the ease may not be transferred to another parish on the basis of forum non | ^conveniens. See La.Code Civ. P. art. 123 A.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court granting the exception of improper venue and transferring the case to La-fourche Parish is reversed. The case is remanded to the 21st Judicial District Court for the Parish of Tangipahoa for further proceedings.

*

 Johnson, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2319

JOHN STERLING PETTENGILL, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

CITY OF RICHWOOD’S FEDERAL SEWER PROJECT; WEST VIRGINIA 

DEVELOPMENT OFFICE; THE SEWER TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, of 

West Virginia’s Department of Environmental Protection, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, 

Chief District Judge. (2:07-cv-00290) 

Submitted: May 22, 2009 Decided: June 15, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

John Sterling Pettengill, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

John Sterling Pettengill appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motions to reopen his civil action. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Pettengill v. City of Richwood’s Fed. Sewer Project, No. 2:07-

cv-00290 (S.D. W. Va. Nov. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
No. 54335.

#### Potomac Distilling Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 877973-G (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.