alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Stefanie RIVIERE, et al., Plaintiffs, Stefanie Riviere; Thomas Sturdevant, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BANNER CHEVROLET, INC., et al., Defendants, Banner Chevrolet, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 97-31226

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 4, 1998.

Michael Brent Hicks, Wayne M. Babovich, Babovich & Spedale, Metairie, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Duris Lee Holmes, Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Ap-pellee.

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal, Plaintiffs, Stefanie Riviere and Thomas Sturdevant, argue that the district court erred in determining that Defendant, Banner Chevrolet, Inc., was not a “creditor” under the Federal Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601, *et seq.*(TILA). We affirm.

The TILA allows claims against creditors. *See*15 U.S.C. § 1640(a). Until 1982, 15 U.S.C. § 1602(f) defined “creditor” as including “credit arrangers.” In 1982, Congress amended the statute, eliminating credit arranger liability. *See*15 U.S.C. § 1602(f). The district court found that Banner was not a creditor under the current version of TILA:

> Banner does not meet the first condition that the individual or business must offer or extend credit. Although Banner has a credit department, it investigates credit histories, and it prepares forms; ultimately, Banner assigns the loan to GMAC, FMC, or another entity. It is that entity who “lends” the money to the consumer to enable him to purchase a vehicle. If a vehicle buyer defaulted on monthly payments, Banner would have no right to repossess the vehicle, or to sue for the balance unpaid. That right would belong to the lienholder or the extender ’ of credit, *336here GMAC, the sole lender/creditor in the transaction.

The district court’s holding is a correct application of the principles set out in the Supreme Court’s decision in *Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Cenance,*452 U.S. 155, 101 S.Ct. 2239, 68 L.Ed.2d 744 (1981). In *Cenance,*like this case, Ford Motor Credit gave auto dealers purchase forms, the dealer and buyer executed the form after Ford approved the buyers’ creditworthiness, and the dealers simultaneously assigned the contract to Ford. The Supreme Court found that the dealers were arrangers of credit and that Ford was the extender of credit. *See id.,*452 U.S. at 157-58. In this case, similarly, Banner Chevrolet is simply a credit arranger and is therefore not a creditor as defined in the controlling 1982 version of TILA.

Finding no error, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
Certifications
I, Sukhbir Singh Mudan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A-3 for the quarter ended September 30,2003, of Caneum, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe small business issuer and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting;
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 

 

 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 22, 2004     /s/ Sukhbir Singh Mudan Sukhbir Singh Mudan, Treasurer(Principal financial officer)
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                            PAGE

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Michael Chou, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of C&D  Production  Inc. for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition
and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.

      I, Chien-Te Chou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of C&D  Production  Inc. for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition
and results of operations of C&D Production Inc.

      Pursuant  to the rules and  regulations  of the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.


                                        By:/s/ Michael Chou
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               Michael Chou
                                               Chairman of the Board,
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               and Secretary


                                        By:/s/ Chien-Te Chou
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               Chien-Te Chou
                                               Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Administrative and
                                               Financial Manager

November 18, 2005
No. 56730.

protest 182101-K (New York).

#### Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. v. United States,

*497Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited authorities, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) Books of *bona fide*foreign authorship similar in all material respects (except title) to those the subject of *Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 C. C. P. A. 11, C. A. D. 309) at 7}4 percent under paragraph 1410, as modified by T. D. 49753; and (2) books of *bona fide*foreign authorship, composed in chief value of india paper, weighing over 10 pounds and less than 20)4 pounds to the ream of 288,000 square inches, similar in all material respects (except title) to the books involved in *Oxford University Press, New York, Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 63, C. D. 663) at 2 cents per pound and 10 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1404, as modified by T. D. 49753.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Tricia A. Willis, as Chief Financial Officer of Huile= Oil & Gas, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
that

     (1) the Company's Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
applicable; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: November 13, 2002                    /s/ TRICIA A. WILLIS
                                            __________________________
                                            Tricia A. Willis
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            Huile= Oil & Gas, Inc.
| Ø | Contract      number: ZH78240901003; |
|--------|--------------------------------------|

| Ø | Maximum      amount of credit facilities to be provided: RMB 100    million; |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Term:      from March 30th,      2009 to March 30th,      2010; |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Purpose      of the loan is to provide working capital for the      Company; |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Interest      rate will be determined in each loan agreement to be signed under this      Credit Facility Agreement; |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Breach      of contract penalties: correct the breach of contract in time limit;      suspension of loan unprovided; demand prepayment of loan principal      and interest before maturity; adjustment of the maximum amount of      credit facilities. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Identification      of terms |
|--------|------------------------------|

| Ø | Terms      of credit |
|--------|----------------------|

| Ø | The      procedure on using the comprehensive credit  facility |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Guaranty |
|--------|----------|

| Ø | The      promise of the Creditor |
|--------|----------------------------------|

| Ø | The      promise of the Debtor |
|--------|--------------------------------|

| Ø | Validity |
|--------|----------|

| Ø | Disputation      settlement |
|--------|-----------------------------|

| Ø | The      integrity of Credit FacilityAgreement |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Supplement      articles |
|--------|--------------------------|

| Ø | Notification |
|--------|--------------|

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Cyber Defense Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William C. Robinson, CEO, Chairman and Principal Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                            CYBER DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.



                                            By: /s/ William C. Robinson
                                                -----------------------
                                                William C. Robinson
                                                CEO, President, Chairman and
                                                Principal Executive Officer

                                                May 11, 2006
No. 96-7051.

#### Giseburt *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certio-rari denied.
***Exhibit 32***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q of ComCam International, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Don Gilbreath, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

Date: August 16, 2010

 

 

/s/ Don Gilbreath

Don Gilbreath, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          29,877                  29,877
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  950,713                 950,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000                 100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,855,979               2,855,979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,943,237               3,943,237
<PP&E>                                         344,325                 344,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,331                  23,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,861,899               6,861,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,709,018               2,709,018
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         9,123                   9,123
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,091,084               4,091,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,861,899               6,861,899
<SALES>                                      1,740,167               3,791,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,740,167               3,791,283
<CGS>                                        1,118,716               2,609,436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,118,716               2,609,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               608,776               1,222,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,019                 105,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,490                  37,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,490                  37,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,490                  37,963
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01                     .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01                     .04


</TABLE>
# C_2013071EN.01002901.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/29

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 28 January 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-100/12)

(Civil service - Article 34(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time limit for bringing proceedings signed by means of a stamp reproducing a lawyer’s signature or other means of reproduction - Action lodged out of time - Manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 71/49

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to pay compensation to the applicant for the harm he purportedly suffered on account of the delay in his retirement procedure under Article 53 of the Staff Rules and on account of the absence of any decision concerning a possible work-related origin of the illness which caused him to retire.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Global Realty Development Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter
Voss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  June
      2, 2008
            By:/s/Peter VossPeter
      VossChief
      Executive Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor Stock Readiness Team wins Big Ideas Award

DLA Distribution Public Affairs

                PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii  –              The DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Stock Readiness Team is the winner of the DLA Distribution Big Ideas Awards for the 2nd Quarter Fiscal Year 2017 in the Small Category.  The 5-member team, which includes Alda Galera, Leonilo Fabro, Joseph Mendiola, Jerome Mcdaniel and David Woods, led DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor efforts in the divestiture of stagnant Navy-owned materiel, effectively returning nearly $180,000 to Navy stock.  The team also responded to DLA’s Suspect Counterfeit Material tasker by completing almost 450 Safety of Flight special inspections in three days, eliminating the possibility of the issuance of counterfeit material two days ahead of the suspense.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLADLA DistributionBig Adeas AwardStock Readiness Team
No. 40477.

#### Protests 955324-G, etc., of Wilson & Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

*551Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists, of Roquefort cheese wrapped in foil or paper or both, similar to that the subject of Abstracts 36724 and 38185. The protests were therefore sustained.