alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# May New Employee Orientation (NEO)

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The DLA Land and Maritime New Employee Orientation will be May 23 in Building 20, Buckeye Room, from 9 a.m. - 3 p.m. and May 24, from 9 a.m. - 2 p.m. 

Starting a new job can be confusing and stressful. During orientation, there will be presentations from various organizations that will provide guidance and support to help new associates become better acclimated to the organization and embrace their new career. 

New associates from all local DLA-hosted tenants, military and interns are welcome to attend. 

The training is mandatory for all new DLA Land and Maritime employees and held the last Wednesday and Thursday of every month. 

Attendance is tracked and reported to Command. If you have any questions, please contact Dawn Sutton (614) 692-6824. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCulture L&Mnew employee L&MCommunity L&MResource the Enterprise L&M
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Corey Goodman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form
10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Corey Goodman      
|                       |  |     |  | Corey Goodman          
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



I, John Doyle, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ John Doyle         
|                       |  |     |  | John Doyle             
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of

Chief Financial Officer

of Mannatech, Incorporated

This certification is
provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006 of Mannatech, Incorporated (the
Issuer).

I, Stephen D. Fenstermacher, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 16, 2007



/s/ Stephen D. FenstermacherStephen D. FenstermacherChief Financial Officer


Subscribed and sworn to before me

This 16thday of March, 2007



|       |  |                              
|------ |  | -----------------------------
|       |  | /s/ Christina Dutton         
|Name:  |  | Christina Dutton             
|Title: |  | Notary Public, State of Texas

My commission expires March 19, 2010

(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mannatech, Incorporated and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Skibski, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John L. Skibski
------------------------------------
John L. Skibski
Chief Financial Officer
May 8, 2006
State Facility Name Facility ID (ORISPL)

Unit ID Year SO2 (tons) Avg. NOx Rate (lb/MMBtu) NOx (tons) AR Independence 6641 1 2009 12254.112 0.247 6610.405 AR Independence 6641 1 2010 14916.687 0.2449 7840.682 AR Independence 6641 1 2011 15307.855 0.2442 7013.311 AR Independence 6641 1 2012 16232.508 0.1968 5364.48 AR Independence 6641 1 2013 12581.188 0.2075 4737.474

AR Independence 6641 2 2009 15171.182 0.2381 7727.701 AR Independence 6641 2 2010 13757.957 0.2461 6777.974 AR Independence 6641 2 2011 15090.108 0.2269 6397.368 AR Independence 6641 2 2012 16741.242 0.2012 5702.292 AR Independence 6641 2 2013 16273.094 0.207 5976.929Heat Input (MMBtu) Fuel Type (Primary)

Fuel Type (Secondary)

Operating StatusUnit Type Owner Operator SO2 Control(s) 5.32E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy Corporation 6.37E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy Corporation 5.72E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy Corporation 5.53E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy Corporation 4.57E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy Corporation

6.46E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy Corporation 5.51E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy Corporation 5.63E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy Corporation 5.72E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy Corporation 5.87E+07Coal Residual Oil Operating Tangentially-fired Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, City of Jonesboro, City of Osceola, Conway Corporation, Entergy Corporation, West Memphis Utilities

Entergy CorporationNOx Control(s)

Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air

Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air Overfire Air
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v KENNETH W. WOOLLEY, Seaman, U. S. Navy, Appellant

8 USCMA 655, 25 CMR 159

No. 10,697

Decided January 31, 1958

*Ensign David M. Clinard,*USNR, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Charles H. Beale, Jr.,*USMC, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

Kenneth W. Woolley, Seaman, United States Navy, absented himself without proper authority from his unit, the U.S.S. ROANOKE, on June 1, 1957, and remained in an absentee status until June 19, 1957. As a result of the absence, he missed the movement of his ship on June 3, 1957. Before a special court-martial he was found guilty in accordance with his plea of the offenses of absence without leave and missing movement through neglect, in violation of Articles 86 and 87, Uniform Code of *656Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886 and 887, respectively. A sentence which included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months, and reduction to the grade of seaman recruit was imposed.

In United States v Posnick, 8 USCMA 201, 24 CMR 11, we held that the offense of absence without leave is a necessarily included lesser offense to the offense of missing movement through neglect. Where multiplicious charges are presented, the accused may only be punished for the greater offense. Although the sentence adjudged was within the maximum jurisdictional limit of the special court-martial, error is nevertheless present. The president of the court failed to instruct the members on the effect of multiplicity in arriving at an appropriate sentence. The prejudice which flows from this omission is as we said in *Posnick,*supra, that:

> “. . . the accused has not had a determination of his sentence on the basis of the single offense he has committed. When this offense is made to appear more numerous than it actually is, by semantical manipulation, the jury must consider only the offense committed by him. Thus, in cases of multiplicity, the law officer, or the president of a special court-martial, must instruct in open court that the maximum sentence imposable is different than the apparent total imposable because of the effect of multiplicity on sentence consideration. This was not done in the instant case and therefore we have no way of knowing what sentence the court might have imposed had they been advised that for the purpose of punishment they could only consider the greater offense.”

We are unable to determine from the board of review’s opinion whether it considered the issue of multiplicity in arriving at an appropriate sentence. Accordingly, we return the record of trial to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for submission to the board of review for reassessment of the sentence in the light of this opinion.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Latimer, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

I concur solely for the reason that United States v Posnick, 8 USCMA 201, 24 CMR 11, is now the law of the Court.
No. 74-5883.

#### Rhodes *v.*Nebraska.

Sup. Ct. Neb. Certiorari denied.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1478 

To modify the boundary of the Minuteman Missile National Historic Site 

in the State of South Dakota, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota (for himself and Mr. THUNE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of the Minuteman Missile National 

Historic Site in the State of South Dakota, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Minuteman Missile Na5 tional Historic Site Boundary Modification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION. 

7 Section 3(a) of the Minuteman Missile National His8 toric Site Establishment Act of 1999 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 

9 Public Law 106–115) is amended— 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1478 IS

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 

2 paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and 

3 (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(3) VISITOR FACILITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE

6 SITE.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the 

8 components described in paragraph (2), the his9 toric site shall include a visitor facility and ad10 ministrative site located on the parcel of land 

11 described in subparagraph (B). 

12 ‘‘(B) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land 

13 referred to in subparagraph (A) consists of— 

14 ‘‘(i) approximately 25 acres of land 

15 within the Buffalo Gap National Grass16 land, located north of exit 131 on Inter17 state 90 in Jackson County, South Da18 kota, as generally depicted on the map en19 titled ‘Minuteman Missile National His20 toric Site Boundary Modification’, num21 bered 406/80,011A, and dated January 14, 

22 2011; and 

23 ‘‘(ii) approximately 3.65 acres of land 

24 located at the Delta 1 Launch Control Fa25 cility for the construction and use of a 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1478 IS

1 parking lot and for other administrative 

2 uses. 

3 ‘‘(C) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map de4 scribed in subparagraph (B) shall be kept on 

5 file and available for public inspection in the 

6 appropriate offices of the National Park Serv7 ice. 

8 ‘‘(D) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JU9 RISDICTION.—Administrative jurisdiction over 

10 the land described in subparagraph (B) is 

11 transferred from the Secretary of Agriculture to 

12 the Secretary, to be administered as part of the 

13 historic site. 

14 ‘‘(E) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The 

15 boundaries of the Buffalo Gap National Grass16 land are modified to exclude the land trans17 ferred under subparagraph (D).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
                
                Defense Logistics Agency
                        The Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency
                    DLA
            Search
                        Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                            Search
                    Search Defense Logistics Agency:
                        Search
    Home

    What DLA Offers
    
        Excess Property Disposal

    Document Services

    Products

    Services

    Programs

    Working With DLA
    
        Applications

    Small Business

    Federal and International Cataloging

    Defense Data Standards

    Events

    Procurement Policies

    Government Programs

    Forms

    Organizations
    
        DLA Headquarters

    DLA Aviation

    DLA Disposition Services

    DLA Distribution

    DLA Energy

    DLA Land and Maritime

    DLA Troop Support

    DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM

    DLA Europe & Africa

    DLA Indo-Pacific

    Customer Support
    
        Self Help Tools

    How to Order

    Find Your Order

    Customer Facing Offices

    Training

    Brochures

    Warfighter Support

    Customer Service Management

    Careers

    About DLA
    
        Contact Us

    Locations

    Leaders

    News

    History

    Media Gallery

    DLA Campaigns  Home
  About DLA
  News
  News Article View
 News
 Women's History Month Highlight
 March is Women's History Month and DLA welcomes an opportunity to celebrate the amazing women who work for and have worked for the agency. Linda Johnson is Deputy Director, Land Supplier Operations, DLA Land & Maritime and says DLA is a great place to work and if you have the will DLA will give you the way to climb the leadership ladder.
            Frances Quinones is an EEO Specialist/SEP Program Manager at DLA Land and Maritime and she says DLA has given her many opportunities and she is passionate about supporting the mission.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 Related Stories Land and Maritime women thrive despite challenges
  DLA Land and Maritime recognizes women volunteers
  DSCC hosts Federal Women’s Program Summit and Luncheon
  DSCC women attend workshop on “How to Become an SES”
 DLA L&M Federal Women’s Program L&M Video L&M
 Contact UsSite IndexStrategic PlanDLA IG HotlineFOIANo FEAR ActWhistleblower ProtectionDLA CareersImagesWebmasterEEOSection 508Public AffairsSAPRExternal Links DisclaimerDOD Information Quality GuidelinesPrivacy/SecurityUSA.govDOD Web PolicyDOD Open GovernmentPlain Language
                    Stay Connected
            
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### Reconnaissance study of the chemical quality of surface waters in the Sacramento River Basin, California

By: Robert Brennan

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619Q

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
July 28, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WENDY SCHREIBER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00010

- CV V.

STATE FARM LLOYDS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, State Farm Lloyds , signed September 23, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We h ave inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore REFORM the judgment of the court below to award appellee, State Farm Lloyds
, a total of $20,195.15 in taxable court costs. This award does not include the appellate court costs that are assessed below. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment. We order appellant, Wendy Schreiber, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2012209EN.01000502.xml

| 14.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tartu Ringkonnakohus (Estonia) lodged on 11 May 2012 — A. Karuse AS v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet

(Case C-222/12)

2012/C 209/08

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Referring court

Tartu Ringkonnakohus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A. Karuse AS

Applicant:

Defendant: Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must the expression ‘in connection with road maintenance’ used in the definition of the exception permitted in Article 13(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) be interpreted as covering a tipping lorry with a laden weight of 25.5 tonnes carrying gravel along a public highway from a quarry to a site of road improvement and maintenance works?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85, OJ 2006 L 102, p. 1.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

June 2, 1944

No. 49459.

#### Protests 83217-K, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

*325Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is mixed feed oats or scalpings, the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Richardson*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 6, C. D. 823), this claim in the protests was sustained.