### 34211 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Rules and Regulations

south of the VORTAC, and within a 7-mile radius of Kissimmee Municipal Airport.

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 30, 2012. Michael D. Wagner, Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. [FR Doc. 2012–13840 Filed 6–8–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA–2012–0130; Airspace**  **Docket No. 12–AWA–2]**
**RIN 2120–AA66 Modification of Multiple Compulsory**  **Reporting Points; Continental United States, Alaska and Hawaii** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This action amends seventeen Domestic, Alaskan, and Hawaiian compulsory reporting points previously updated in the FAA aeronautical database without accompanying regulatory action being taken. The FAA is taking this action to correct the compulsory reporting point information contained in part 71 to ensure it matches the information contained in the FAA’s aeronautical database and to ensure the safety and efficiency of the National Airspace System (NAS).
**DATES :**  Effective date 0901 UTC June 11, 2012. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Colby Abbott, Airspace, Regulations and ATC Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  History

After a recent review of aeronautical data, the National Flight Data Center (NFDC) identified seventeen compulsory reporting points published in FAA Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, that did not match the geographic position information contained in the FAA’s aeronautical database for the reporting points. When these compulsory reporting points were updated in the aeronautical database, the corresponding part 71 amendment actions were not also accomplished, in error. The reporting points include fourteen Domestic reporting points, one Alaskan low altitude reporting point, and two Hawaiian reporting points. To overcome any confusion or flight safety issues associated with conflicting compulsory reporting point information published, the FAA is amending the seventeen part 71 reporting points identified by NFDC. Accordingly, since this is an administrative correction to update compulsory reporting point information currently contained in the FAA’s aeronautical database, notice and public procedures under Title 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary.
The Rule

The FAA amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by amending the geographic position information for fourteen Domestic reporting points, one Alaskan low altitude reporting point, and two Hawaiian reporting points. Specifically, the FAA amends the ALASK, BOGGY, CROAK, DOLPH, HEMLO, HERIN, HOBEE, IDAHO, SEDAR, TITON, TROUT, UTAHS, VERMO, and VIPER Domestic reporting points; the CORVA Alaskan low altitude reporting point; and the BATES and FISHE Hawaiian reporting points in part 71.

Domestic Low Altitude Reporting Points, Other Domestic Reporting Points designated at all altitudes, Alaskan Low Altitude Reporting Points, and Hawaiian Reporting Points are listed in paragraph 7001, 7003, 7004, and 7006, respectively of FAA Order 7400.9V dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15, 2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority.

This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it amends existing Domestic, Alaskan, and Hawaiian Reporting Points contained in the NAS.
Environmental Review

The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance with 311a, FAA Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures.’’ This airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389. **§ 71.1 [Amended]**

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 9, 2011, and effective September 15, 2011, is amended as follows: Paragraph 7001 Domestic low altitude reporting points. * * * * *


### 34212 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 112 / Monday, June 11, 2012 / Rules and Regulations

TITON: [Amended]

Lat. 46 ° 42 ′43 ′′ N., long. 120 ° 44 ′ 31 ′′ W. (INT Yakima, WA, 304 ° and Ellensburg, WA, 212 ° radials). * * * * * Paragraph 7003 Other domestic reporting points. * * * * * ALASK: [Amended]

Lat. 16 ° 50 ′ 13 ′′ N., long. 66 ° 32 ′ 15 ′′ W. (INT Ponce, PR, 181 ° and St Croix, VI, 243 ° radials). * * * * * BOGGY: [Amended]

Lat. 28 ° 15 ′02 ′′ N., long. 91 ° 27 ′45 ′′ W. * * * * * CROAK: [Amended]

Lat. 36 ° 56 ′ 19′′ N., long. 73 ° 00 ′00′′ W. (INT Norfolk, VA, 088 ° and Sea Isle, NJ, 146 ° radials). * * * * * DOLPH: [Amended]

Lat. 28 ° 15 ′09′′ N., long. 90 ° 03 ′ 12 ′′ W. * * * * * HEMLO: [Amended]

Lat. 43 ° 18 ′09′′ N., long. 126 ° 40 ′ 50′′ W. HERIN: [Amended]

Lat. 42 ° 00 ′ 10′′ N., long. 67 ° 47 ′ 26′′ W. HOBEE: [Amended]

Lat. 29 ° 13 ′ 21 ′′ N., long. 79 ° 09 ′05 ′′ W. (INT Carolina Beach, NC, NDB 192 ° bearing and Orlando, FL, VORTAC 070 ° radial). IDAHO: [Amended]

Lat. 19 ° 15 ′ 38 ′′ N., long. 67 ° 38 ′ 22 ′′ W. * * * * * SEDAR: [Amended]

Lat. 45 ° 30 ′ 26′′ N., long. 126 ° 43 ′03 ′′ W. * * * * * TROUT: [Amended]

Lat. 30 ° 23 ′01 ′′ N., long. 76 ° 59 ′ 59′′ W. UTAHS: [Amended]

Lat. 19 ° 41 ′ 26′′ N., long. 67 ° 17 ′ 12 ′′ W. VERMO: [Amended]

Lat. 20 ° 07 ′ 34′′ N., long. 66 ° 12 ′ 55 ′′ W. VIPER: [Amended]

Lat. 28 ° 14 ′ 55 ′′ N., long. 88 ° 53 ′08 ′′ W. (INT Leeville, FL, 130 ° and Pickens, FL, NDB

215 ° radials). Paragraph 7004 Alaskan low altitude reporting points. * * * * * CORVA: [Amended]

Lat. 60 ° 16 ′ 56′′ N., long. 145 ° 14 ′ 51 ′′ W. * * * * * Paragraph 7006 Hawaiian reporting points. BATES: [Amended]

Lat. 20 ° 00 ′ 31 ′′ N., long. 153 ° 33 ′04′′ W. * * * * * FISHE: [Amended]
Lat. 21 ° 46 ′ 38 ′′ N., long. 155 ° 32 ′08 ′′ W. (INT Molokai, HI, 067 ° and Upolu Point, HI, 010 ° radials). * * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, June 4, 2012. Paul Gallant Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and ATC Procedures Group. [FR Doc. 2012–13993 Filed 6–8–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES**  **Food and Drug Administration**

**21 CFR Part 179 [Docket No. FDA–2007–F–0390] (Formerly**  **2007F–0115) Irradiation in the Production,**  **Processing, and Handling of Food**

**AGENCY :**  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the food additive regulations to provide for the safe use of a carbon dioxide laser for etching information on the surface of fresh, intact citrus fruit. This action is in response to a petition filed by Durand-Wayland, Inc.
**DATES :**  This rule is effective June 11, 2012. Submit either electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing by July 11, 2012. See section VIII of this document for information on the filing of objections.
**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit either electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing, identified by Docket No. FDA–2007–F–0390, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions

Submit electronic objections in the following way:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions

Submit written objections in the following ways:

• FAX: 301–827–6870.

• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA– 305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name and Docket No. FDA–2007–F–0390 for this rulemaking. All objections received will be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting objections, see section VIII. Objections in the **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** section of this document.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or objections received, go to http:// www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the ‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Celeste Johnston, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740– 3835, 240–402–1282. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Introduction

In a notice published in the Federal Register of April 11, 2007 (72 FR 18263), FDA announced that a food additive petition (FAP 7M4768) had been filed by Durand-Wayland, Inc., c/o Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C., 700 13th St. NW., suite 1200, Washington, DC 20005–5929. The petition proposed that the food additive regulations in part 179 (21 CFR part 179) be amended to provide for the safe use of a carbon dioxide laser for etching information on food, excluding meat and poultry. The intended technical effect of the carbon dioxide laser is toetch information, such as the price lookup code printed on an adhesive label placed on the surface of individual, fresh produce items sold at retail, directly onto the surface of food. The carbon dioxide laser therefore obviates the need for an adhesive label.

In a letter dated April 27, 2007, Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C., informed FDA that Sunkist Growers, Inc., 14130 Riverside Dr., Sherman Oaks, CA 91423–2313, had joined Durand-Wayland, Inc., as co-petitioner of FAP 7M4768. The letter explained that Hyman, Phelps & McNamara would represent both petitioners with regard to FAP 7M4768.

Subsequent to the filing of the petition, the petitioners amended the petition by requesting a response to the proposed use of the carbon dioxide laser for etching information on the skin of fresh, intact citrus fruit not intended for commercial juice production, while the other requests in the petition remained