alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 163 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                         Calendar No. 2
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 163

 To require that the Government prioritize all obligations on the debt 
    held by the public in the event that the debt limit is reached.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

Mr. Toomey (for himself, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Lee, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Barrasso, 
 Mr. Johanns, Mr. Isakson, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Inhofe, 
    Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin, Mr. Paul, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Coburn, Mr. 
Chambliss, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; which was read 
                             the first time

                            January 26, 2011

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that the Government prioritize all obligations on the debt 
    held by the public in the event that the debt limit is reached.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Full Faith and Credit Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITIZE OBLIGATIONS ON THE DEBT HELD BY THE PUBLIC.

    In the event that the debt of the United States Government, as 
defined in section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, reaches the 
statutory limit, the authority of the Department of the Treasury 
provided in section 3123 of title 31, United States Code, to pay with 
legal tender the principal and interest on debt held by the public 
shall take priority over all other obligations incurred by the 
Government of the United States.
                                                         Calendar No. 2

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 163

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To require that the Government prioritize all obligations on the debt 
    held by the public in the event that the debt limit is reached.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 26, 2011

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
Before the Second Division,

June 16, 1949

No. 53287.

#### Pan American Import & Export Co. *v.*United States,

protest 141877-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1818 Prepped byOllie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 66 ) ll-F- 7 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/6/20083:12:46

PM Sheet 66 of 79P. 2 

### A-87-1 1 II-F-0 7

Insert s onrulemaking reproposa l fo r draf t preamble , Offic e o f Managemen t an

d Budget , transmitte d t o Fran k Blake , U.S . EPA , Jul y198 7 Propose d Inser t fo r Onboar d Proposa l Pursuan t t o Sectio n20 2 (a)(6) , EP Amus t consul t wit hth e Secretar yo f Transportatio nwit hrespec t t o moto r vehicl e safet y befor e promulgatin g a requiremen t fo r onboar d technology . Becaus e o f th e statutor ysignificanc e attache d t o thi s consultation , EP A commit s t o reope nth e recor d o f thi s rulemakin g whe nth e Agenc y receive s th e comment s fro mth e Secretar yo f Transportation . A t tha t time , th e Agenc ywil l specificall yas k fo r comment s o nwhether , i nligh t o f safet yo r othe r relevan t concerns , th e onboar d regulatio nshoul d b e structure d t o provid e a ninterna l checkpoin t o r "secon d look " prio r t o th e ful l commercia l manufactur e o f vehicle s equippe d wit honboar d technology . Th e "secon d look " woul d provide , i neffect , a forma l mechanis mfo r th e Agenc yt o reasses s th e desirabilit yo f goin g forwar d wit h a nonboar d requiremen t i nligh t o f potentiall ychange d circum

stances , suc ha s furthe r informatio no nsafet yconcerns , non-attainmen t status , lea d tim e requirement s o r othe r issues .

% 

# XP. 3

Im I < * » * \

Propose d Inser t fo r Onboar d Proposa l

Pursuan t t o Sectio n20 2 (a)(6) , EP Amus t consul t wit hth e Secretar yo f Transportatio nwit hrespec t t o moto r vehicl e safet y befor e promulgatin g a requiremen t fo r onboar d technology . Becaus e o f th e statutor ysignificanc e attache d t o thi s consultation , EP A wil l reope nth e recor d o f thi s rulemakin g whe nth e Agenc yreceive s th e comment s fro mth e Secretar yo f Transportatio nan d wil l repropos e th e rul e fo r commen t t o asses s change d circumstances . Thi s reproposa l shal l occu r prio r t o fina l decisio no nth e merit s o f th e onboar d reg . an d sufficientl yprio r t o th e ful l commercia l manufactur e o f vehicle s wit honboar d technolog yt o allo wth e publi c a meaningfu l opportunit yt o commen t o nwhateve r significan t change s i ncircumstance s ma yoccu r prio r t o ful l manufacture . I n th e reproposal , th e Agenc ywil l specificall yas k fo r comment s o n whether , i nligh t o f safet yo r othe r relevan t concerns , th e onboar d regulatio nshoul d b e structure d t o provid e a ninterna l checkpoin t o r "secon d look " prio r t o th e ful l commercia l manufactur e o f vehicle s equippe d wit honboar d technology . Th e "secon d look " woul d provide , i neffect , a forma l mechanis mfo r th e Agenc yt o reasses s th e desirabilit yo f goin g forwar d wit ha nonboar d requiremen t i nligh t o f potentiall ychange d circumstances , suc h a s furthe r informatio no nsafet yconcerns , non-attainmen t status , lea d tim e requirement s o r othe r issues .
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# 3rd, 176th Maintenance Squadrons integration keep C-17s in the fight

By Senior Airman Curt Beach673d Air Base Wing Public Affairs

                JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON176th maintenance squadron3rd Maintenance Squadronmaintenanceinspection
EPA Registration

83520-7 

Volume 4
1
2
Pages 3-10 - *Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment* 
11
12
13
14
15
16

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential 

treatment*
17
18

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael L. Hirschey state and attest that:

     (1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of OneSource Technologies, Inc.
(the"issuer").

     (2) Accompanying this certification is the Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2004, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by the issuer
with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which contains
financial statements.

     (3) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on my
knowledge:

          A. the periodic report containing the financial statements fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
     Act, and

          B. the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the issuer for the periods presented therein.


/s/ Michael L. Hirschey
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 16, 2004
No. 39100.

#### Protest 925140-G of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of animals in chief value of plaster-of-paris similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Okuda*(23 C. C. P. A. 46, T. D. 47713). The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 205 was therefore sustained.
No. 96-5745.

#### White *v.*Vaughn, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 96-1112.

#### Martech USA, Inc. *v.*Hoeflich.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of Insurance Company of North America for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted. Cer-tiorari denied.
**Exhibit 13.1**

----

Back to Contents

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Thomas Henry Glocer, Chief Executive of Reuters Group PLC (the “Company”) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     a)  The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     b)  The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

| Dated: 16 March 2004  | By/s/  | Thomas H. Glocer                  |
|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                       |   |                              |
|                       |   | _____________________________     |
|                       |   | Thomas H. Glocer  Chief Executive |

 

----
(Reap. Dec. 8408)

Entry No. 1608, etc.

#### J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

(Decided March 17, 1955)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*476Olives, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> 1) The merchandise covered by these appeals consists of sheathing felt imported from England, which is such or similar to the sheathing felt involved in US v. Morse et al., decided in ARD 38 and ARD 45, and therein held to be subject to appraisement upon the basis of export value. The record in said case is hereby incorporated herein.

> 2) Sheathing felt such as or similar to the sheathing felt covered by these appeals was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States in usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade at the prices stated during the respective periods, viz:

> Per crate of 10 rolls of sheathing Period of exportation felt 25 yds. long by 32" wide

> February 9, 1948, to £8-15-0

> November 12, 1950 Less nondurable charges as invoiced

> 3) There was no higher foreign value during the respective periods, and upon this stipulation the appeals enumerated in attached schedule may be deemed submitted, they being limited to sheathing felt.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as tbat value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe sbeatbing felt here involved, and tbat such value was as follows:

> English currency per crate of 10 rolls of sheathing felt 25 yards Period of exportation long by 32" wide

Insofar as tbe appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are hereby dismissed.

> February 9, 1948, to £8.15.0

> November 12, 1950 Less nondutiable charges as invoiced

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9641)

#### Ad. M. Schmid & Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 827851, etc.

*619(Decided March 22, 1960)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule A, attached to and made part of the decision herein, have been consolidated for determination.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact which reads as follows—

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED subject to the approval of the Court that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof consists of certain dental instruments exported from Germany.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for reap-praisement enumerated in Schedule A are limited to the items marked “A” and initialed JZ (Examiner’s Initials) by Examiner Joseph Zeikel' (Examiner’s Name).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED as to the items marked “A” as aforesaid that the prices at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values less 3%, and that there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for reap-praisement enumerated in Schedule A are limited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid and abandoned as to all other items and that the said appeals for reappraisement may be submitted upon this stipulation.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that foreign, value, as that value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(c)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis for determining the value of the •dental instruments in controversy represented by the items marked “A” and initialed “JZ” by Examiner Joseph Zeikel on the invoices .accompanying the entries covered by the instant appeals, and that said value is the appraised values, less 3 per centum. As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 29 

Calling for the removal of all restrictions from the public, the press, and 

military families in mourning that would prohibit their presence at the 

arrival at military installations in the United States or overseas of 

the remains of the Nation’s fallen heroes, the members of the Armed 

Forces who have died in Iraq or Afghanistan, with the assurance that 

family requests for privacy will be respected. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2007 

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Calling for the removal of all restrictions from the public, 

the press, and military families in mourning that would 

prohibit their presence at the arrival at military installations in the United States or overseas of the remains 

of the Nation’s fallen heroes, the members of the Armed 

Forces who have died in Iraq or Afghanistan, with the 

assurance that family requests for privacy will be respected. 

Whereas the truest heroes of the Iraq War are the members 

of the United States Armed Forces who have made the 

ultimate sacrifice of their lives on behalf of their country; 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 29 IH 

Whereas these fallen heroes have earned and should be given 

the highest respect of their country and its citizens; 

Whereas the families of United States military personnel who 

have died in service to the United States should know the 

depth of the Nation’s appreciation for the sacrifices they 

have made; 

Whereas the cloak of secrecy that surrounds the return of the 

fallen heroes from Iraq and Afghanistan at United States 

military installations at home and abroad denies them deserved recognition and should be removed; 

Whereas upon the arrival of the remains of their fallen loved 

ones, the families should be allowed to show their respects without restrictions; 

Whereas the families of the Nation’s fallen heroes should be 

permitted to escort the remains of their loved ones to 

their final resting places, with their transportation facilitated to the point of arrival of the remains in the United 

States; and 

Whereas the final farewells of the family, friends, and loved 

ones should be conducted with appropriate solemnity, 

pomp, and circumstance: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That all restrictions should be removed from 

3 the public, the press, and military families in mourning 

4 that would prohibit their presence at the arrival at mili5 tary installations in the United States or overseas of the 

6 remains of the Nation’s fallen heroes, the members of the 

7 Armed Forces who have died in Iraq or Afghanistan, with 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 29 IH 

1 the assurance that family requests for privacy will be re2 spected. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 35018]


State of Maine--Acquisition Exemption--Certain Assets of St. 
Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad Company

    The State of Maine, acting by and through its Department of 
Transportation (Maine DOT), a noncarrier, has filed a verified notice 
of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire from St. Lawrence & 
Atlantic Railroad Company (SLR) certain right-of-way and trackage, 
totaling approximately 11 miles in Cumberland County, ME. The rail line 
(the Subject line) extends between approximately milepost 1.74 at 
Deering and approximately milepost 12.163 south of the diamond crossing 
at Yarmouth Junction.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In the same docket, Maine DOT has simultaneously filed a 
joint motion to dismiss its verified notice of exemption on 
jurisdictional grounds. That request will be handled in a separate 
Board decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Maine DOT certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result 
of the transaction will not exceed those that would qualify it as a 
Class III rail carrier. The parties state that they intend to 
consummate this transaction on or before June 30, 2007, if all 
conditions precedent have been satisfied. The exemption is scheduled to 
become effective on June 6, 2007, which is 30 days from the May 7, 2007 
official filing date of the notice.
    Maine DOT states that it will acquire SLR's right, title and 
interest in the right-of-way, trackage and other physical assets 
associated with the Subject Line, but will not acquire the right or 
obligation to conduct any rail freight operations thereon. SLR will 
retain a permanent and exclusive easement for freight operation on the 
Subject Line.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction. Any petition for stay will be due no later than May 30, 
2007 (at least 7 days before the effective date of the exemption).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 35018, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on James E. Howard, One Thompson 
Square, Suite 201, Charlestown, MA 02129.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: May 10, 2007.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9378 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
No. 96-1109.

#### Davis *v.*AT&T Communications, Inc.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.