The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S.

Department of Justice and prepared the following final report:

Document Title: Locally Initiated Research Partnership: The

Framingham, Massachusetts Police Department

and Social Science Research and Evaluation,

Inc.

Author(s): Robert Apsler Ph.D., Steven Carl, Michele R.

Cummins

Document No.: 187103

Date Received: March 6, 2001

Award Number: 96-IJ-CX-0070

This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice.

To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federallyfunded grant final report available electronically in addition to

traditional paper copies.

Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect

the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
P1/19/2881 15: 29 781-278-6614 __. -. .- - . --:< I 

S. S. R. E. PAGE 82 

LOCALLY INITIATED RESEARCH PARTNERSHP: 

THE FRAMlNGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS POLICE 

DEPARTMENT AND SOCN SCIENCE RESEARCH AND 

EVALUATION, INC. 

Robert Apsler, Ph.D. 

Captain Steven Carl 

Michele R. Cumins 

Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc. 

21-C Cambridge Street 

Burlington, MA 01 803 

(78 1)-270-66 13 

Framingham Police Department 

1 William Welch Way 

Framingham, MA 0 1702 

JULY 2000 

. FINALREPORT 

GRANT NO. 96-IJ-CX-0070 

Prepared For 

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE &/ 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
c 

-4 

-I1 I 

-. 

This project was supporte 

Justice Programs, U.S. D 

author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Department of Justice. 

stitute of Justice, Office of 

this document are those of the 

so P 

?-3 ,: i 

14 

:. . I. 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
. 

t a 

Robert Apsler, Ph.D., is Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychology in the D 

Psychiatry at the Harvard Medical School and President of Social Science Research and 

Evaluation, Inc. He has served as Principal or Co-Principal Investigator on numerous grants and 

contracts from many federal, state, and local agencies. The bulk of his work over the last 25 

years has been in the highway safety and substance abuse areas. Other research projects have 

focused on policing and domestic violence. - 

!# i 

f B 

f 

t 

d 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
E OF CONTENTS 

.... .. . .... 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......... : .................................................................................... i 

BACKGROUND ........................ .............. * ............................................................ 1 ... Development of a Research Agenda ................................................................................... 2 

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESEARCH .......................................................................... 3 

An Experimental Evaluation of the Use of Cellular Phones to Enforce 

Restraining Orders .................................................................................................... 3 

Background ............................................................................................................ 3 

Methods ................................................................................................................ 5 

Results .................................................................................................................. 6 

Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 6 

Differences Among Female Victims of Domestic Violence Who Come to the 

Attention of the Police ........................................... ................................................... 7 

Methods ................................................................................................................ 8 

Results .................................................................................................................. 9 

Expectations of future abuse ............................................................................... 10 

Fear of the offender .......................................................................................... 11 

Previous abuse ................................................................................................. 12 

Desired future relationship with the offender ........................................................... 14 

Demographic variables ...................................................................................... 15 

Discussion ......................................................................................................... 15 

Perceptions of the Police by Victims of Domestic Violence Seen at a 

Suburban Police Department .................................................................................... 18 

Methods .............................................................................................................. 22 

Results ................................................................................................................ 23 

Types of assistance provided by the police ............................................................. 24 

Ratings of police assistance ................................................................................ 25 

Discussion ............................................................................................................ 28 

Social Supports Can Be Helpfid But May Not Be Sufficient For Victims of 

Domestic Violence .................................................................................................. 30 

Methods .............................................................................................................. 52 

Results ................................................................................................................ 33 

The existence of social supports ........................................................................... 34 

Social supports are helphl .................................................................................. 34 

Social supports may not be sufficient .................................................................... 37 

Discussion ............................................................................................................ 39 

3 a. t 

1 

OTHER RESEARCH PROJECTS ................................................................................ 41 

Officer Exchange Program ...................................................................................... 41 

Improved Utilization of Crime Data ........................................................................ 44 

The Broken Windows Theory Applied to Highway Safety ...................................... 45 

Reducing the Impact of Non-Emergency 91 1 Calls ................................................. 45 

Organizational Stress in Police Departments ........................................................... 51 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
":: 

.I.. 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

The Locally Initiated Research Partnership: ne Framingham, M.A. Police Department ad 

Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc. began on January 1 , 1997 with the following goal: 

e To develop and establish a collaborative research program between the Framingham 

Police Department and Social Science Research and Evaluation, Inc. 

While working with the police, SSRE learned about an innovative domestic violence 

intervention that had been implemented by the police. Discussions between the police and SSRE 

led to the current project, which highlighted an evaluation of that domestic violence intervention. 

From the very beginning, both the Framingham Police Department and SSRE committed 

themselves to a true collaborative effort in which both partners were equals and hlly involved in 

the research process. 

Even before reaching the half-way point in the project, the Partnership had targeted several c. 6 

critical areas for research and began the work of creating research programs to pursue them. 

Literature reviews were conducted, pilot studies designed, and proposals written to obtain firther 

finding. 

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESEARCH 

AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES TO 

ENFORCE RESTRAINING ORDERS 

In August 1995, the Framingham Police Department began distributing cellular 

telephones to victims of domestic violence who had taken out restraining orders and were judged 

to be at high risk for hrther violence. The rationale behind the program was that cellular phones 

could provide an immediate connection between victim and police when a threat was detected. nThe phones were expected to be effective __ even if they failed to deter perpetrators. By calling the 

-_ 0 

1 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
police as soon as they detected a threat, victims would be able to minimize the extent of the 

abuse and simplifL police efforts to apprehend perpetrators. 

An evaluation of the program was designed in which ale victims of domestic violence 

would be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Victims in the experimental group would be 

given a cellular phone with which they could call the police in an emergency. Victims in the 

control group would not receive phones. 

The initial results were completely unexpected. First, there were not as many adult $3 

female victims of domestic partner abuse as anticipated. Second, almost none of the adult 

female victims of violence fiom their domestic partners met all the criteria for selection into the 

study. Some women wanted to get back together with the offender either immediately or sooner 

than our six-month criterion. Others did not expect to be abused again, and some did not want a 

cellular phone. Responses to other items on the pretest showed that most women felt that they 

could easily call the police if necessary - they did not need a cellular phone. 

The results were exciting because of their counterintuitive nature. Both the police and 

SSRE researchers expected that most victims of domestic violence would fit the stereotypic 

profile of a severely abused woman desperate to escape her abuser. In fact, the results showed 

that few women fit that profile. Instead, most victims were victims of less severe abuse. 

Consequently, it was decided to continue collecting information in order to learn more about the 

different types of victims. The information provided by these women resulted in the three 

reports that follow. 

The research was conducted in Framingham, Massachusetts, a Boston suburb of roughly 

65,000 citizens with a police department of 11 1 officers (including the chief and all supervisors). 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. 

Framingham, well-known because e long-standing Heart ,!?tu+, closely 

represents the United States in its 

0 

Subjects for the three reports consisted of consecuti ale victims who came to the 

attention of the police because of a telephone call requesting police intervention in a domestic 

violence incident involving a partner over the course of one year. These women were 

subsequently interviewed by members of the Department’s domestic violence unit as soon as 

was practical following the initial incident - usually within a day or two. When possible, 

officers interviewed the victims in person 

Three members of the police department’s domestic violence unit interviewed 100 adult 

female victims. Most of the victims (72%) called for police help themselves, while in the other 

28% of the cases, someone other than the victim called the police. Half (53%) of the victims 

were living with the abuser at the time of the incident and half (47%) were not. Just over half 

(58%) of the victims reported that children under the age of 18 were living with them. 

DIFFERENCES AMONG FEMALE VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WHO 

COME TO THE ATTENTION OF THE POLICE 

P 

3 

4 This study was an exploratory effort to fill in the gaps of current knowledge about female 

’” 

3 

victims of domestic partner violence who come to the attention of the police. Unlike previous 

research, this study sought to describe the entire population of domestic victims seen by the 

police. Subjects were identified on the basis of their having been in contact with the police 

T 

i 

rather than indirectly through some other means of recruitment. 0 

E 

It was expected that women who come to the attention of police would expect firther 

abuse, be frightened, have experienced previous abuse, and want to separate from their abuser. 

L) 

4 

Some subjects in the current study did indeed match this description. A quarter of the sample 

- 0 reported that it was either Somewhat Likely or Ve7y Likely that their assailant would abuse them 

... 

111 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
again in the future. These victims expected that they would be seriously injured as a result of 

this future abuse, and they wanted a permanent separation from the offender. Many other 

victims in the study differed markedly from expectations. Over half of the sample believed that 

future abuse was unlikely; were not at all or only slightly afraid of the offender; expected that i$ 

they were abused again, they would not be harmed seriously. A fifth of the victims wanted to 

return immediately to the offender. 

One of the questions raised by this study is whether greater efforts should be directed at 

tailoring the police response to the nature of the domestic violence incident. If police interaction 

precedes victims accessing shelters or the judicial system, are there steps that the police can 

initiate to prevent the escalation of violence? It may be unreasonable to expect a universal 

strategy, such as mandatory arrest, to be effective when applied to fundamentally different types 

of domestic violence incidents. Another fundamental question is whether the first-time incidents 

of domestic violence encountered in this study were isolated events, or the beginning of a cycle 

of abuse. 

PERCEPTIONS OF THE POLICE BY VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SEEN AT 

A SUBURBAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 

Existing research about the perceptions domestic violence victims hold of police is 

limited. It generally includes only those victims who have accessed shelters as a result of their 

situations; only one, to our knowledge, studies victims who came in contact with the police. 

Other research is limited in its small sample size. Nevertheless, the research does suggest that 

victims’ perceptions of the police can have an important impact on their behavior. Overall, 

battered women tend to view the police as somewhat helpful. But differences in findings among 

populations studied suggest that victims’ perceptions may vary depending on the severity of 

iv 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
opinions than victims who accessed a victim assistance program. ? 

The goal of this study was to add to the sparse body of knowledge about domestic 

!% 

violence victims’ perceptions of the police. The research addresses what victims wanted from 

the police, the extent to which they perceived that they obtained what they wanted, and how 

satisfied they were with the actions of the police. Specifically, the study asked victims if they 

were satisfied in the assistance provided by the police in obtaining restraining orders, counseling, 

and arrest of the batterer. 

Taken together, the victims’ responses to several items provide surprisingly strong 

support for police actions across the wide range of women who came to the attention of a 

suburban police department as a result of domestic violence calls. Victims’ direct ratings of the 

helpfulness of the police were very positive. Even stronger support for the police resulted from a 

question asking if the victims would be willing to call for police help with a similar incident if it 

should arise in the future. 

2 

8 

a 

Questions about specific types of assistance produced mixed results. The 

seen as very helpful by those who wanted help obtaining or enforcing a restraining order. On the 

other hand, many victims who wanted help finding counseling faulted the police for failing to 

provide that help. 

+ 

. 

Victims’ willingness to be open and honest with a police officer interviewing them about 

their reactions to other police officers remains a nagging issue. A few victims presented very 

ns to the police, demonstrating th 

sking about previous involvement with the police provides more evidence, 

o state their opinions. 

albeit indirect, that many victims gave honest responses to these interviewers. When victims 

V 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
I 

._ 

a were asked if the p 

involving the current offender, 29 said that they ha 

answered a follow-up question asking ho 

While generally positive, the responses 

performance than those given to the question about the police actions in the current incident. 

Fifty-four percent of these victims said that the police had been Very HelpJirZ, compared to 75% 

who gave this response to the current incident. Eighteen percent rated the police as Not HeIpficZ 

in the previous incident, compared to 6% for the current incident. 

SOCIAL SUPPORTS CAN BE HELPFUL BUT MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT 

FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 

ever been ca 

phl the police had been during that in 

nsiderably less enthusiastic about the 

. 

The purpose of the present study was to begin exploring social supports in relationship to 

domestic violence in the lives of victims at the time they came to the attention of the police. 

a These women represent a broad population in that they did not necessarily suffer severe abuse, as 

did the usual subjects of studies on social supports. The most basic questions posed by this study 

were whether these victims had social supports and, if so, whether they perceived these social 

supports as being helpful. Another hndamental question explored similarities and differences 

between victims with and without social supports and how these victims compared to those in 

previous studies. @ 

Perceived helpful social supports may be far more common among victims of domestic 

violence than generally appreciated. Some previous studies found few social supports available 

to victims of domestic violence. Typically, these studies interviewed victims who had made use 

of domestic violence shelters after experiencing severe levels of violence. Subjects in the 

present study represent a much broader range of incidents with a greater range of levels of 

vi 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
E 

t 

0. 

violence. Not only did most of the vi 

them, but in many cases, they perceived those supports to be very helpfbl. 

by the police have social supports available to 

The presence of helpfbl social suppo as associated with several positive factors. 

Victims who possessed helpfbl social supports were more likely than those without to have 

called the police themselves than to have had someone else call the police. Overall, victims with 

helpfbl social supports appeared to be at less risk for fbture violence from their assailant. They 

believed that future violence was less likely than did victims without helpfbl social supports, and 

they were less likely to expect fbture injuries to be severe. 

Unfortunately, the existence of helphl social supports is not enough to resolve victims' 

problems with domestic violence. Even with the assistance of helpful social supports, some 

victims remained very afraid of their assailant and expected to be seriously harmed in the future. 

More of the victims without helpfbl social supports expected that the injury would be Very 

Serious, but there were still many victims with helphl social supports who also expected to be 

seriously injured in the future. Over a quarter of the victims who had helpfbl social supports 

reported that they were Very Afraid of the assailant. 

These findings fbrther document the well-known fact that domestic violence can be an 

extraordinarily difficult situation from which to escape. Resources, such as helpfbl social 

supports, that might be very usehl in many other situations can prove inadequate when it comes 

8 

. 

to escaping a committed assailant. 

OTHER RESEARCH PROJECTS 

The Partnership developed the following research projects and sought fbnding for their 

implementation. 

vii 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
OFFICER EXCHANGE PROGRAM 

The Partnership designed an evaluation of an officer exchange program that was being 

planned by the Framingham and Chelsea Police Departments. The exchange program was 

similar to common private industry training. The premise was that exposing officers to other 

progressive departments could instill creativity and insight with respect to delivery of police 

services. 

THE BROKEN WINDOWS THEORY APPLIED TO HIGHWAY SAFETY 

The Partnership is currently negotiating with the National Highway Traffic Safety 

AdministrationAJ. S. Department of Transportation to test one of their long-standing, 

fundamental assumptions. NHTSA has assumed that vigorous enforcement of traffic violations 

will result in an overall reduction of all types of crime - not just traflCic offenses. 

REDUCING THE IMPACT OF NON-EMERGENCY 911 CALLS 

Reducing the impact of non-emergency 9 1 1 calls is one of the Framingham Police 

Department's top priorities. Consequently, the Partnership is pursuing two approaches to dealing 

with the problem. The first is a variation of what other cities are implementing as an attempt to 

encourage the public to use 91 1 only for life-threatening emergencies. Framingham's approach 

differs from those on which NIJ is currently focusing in that it will educate the public to use an 

existing police business line for non-emergencies, rather than creating a 3 11 system or a new 

I. 

. 

non-emergency seven-digit number. 

The second approach that the Partnership will pursue recognizes that many non-emergency 

calls will continue to be made to 91 1, even if an education program aimed at diverting these calls 

to a different number is relatively successful. Therefore, the Partnership also seeks to improve 

the ways in which 91 1 dispatchers deal with non-emergency calls. 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRESS IN POLICE DEPARTMEN 

The overall goal of this research project is to learn about the relationship betwee 

organizational factors and police stress. Specific objectives include learning: 

0 What are the primary sources of organizational stress? 

0 What is the relative importance of organizational and operational factors as they relate to 

stress for the police? 

0 How does organizational stress in police departments differ from that in other 

organizations? 

0 How do officers differ in their reactions to organizational stress? 

0 What is the relationship between subjective stress and overt symptoms? 

r 

0 

0 What types of interventions can most effectively deal with organizational stress? 

J 

-a 

ix 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
a 

lice Department and 

e To develop and establish a collaborative research program between the Framingham 

Police Department and Social Science Research and EvaluationJnc. 2 

.i .?j . :j 

Collaboration between the Framingham Police Department and Social Science Research and 3 

%- 

@ -I’ 

--. I i 

Evaluation, Inc. (SSRE) first began several years earlier as a result of SSRE’s role as the 

evaluator of the Framingham Prevention Coalition. This coalition was a partnership funded by sr 

the U.S. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention that included the Framingham Police 

Department, the public school system in Framingham, the local hospital, many Framingham 

social service agencies, and interested individuals. The Framingham police helped SSRE 

interpret and present the findings from annual surveys of Framingham high school students. 

Chief Brent Larrabee participated in several presentations of the student survey findings. 

While working with the police on the student surveys, SSRE learned about an innovative 

domestic violence intervention that had been implemented by the police. Discussions between 

the police and SSRE led to the current project, which highlighted an evaluation of that domestic 

violence intervention. 

The announcement of MJ finding possibilities for a partnership led to firther discussion of 

other research needs within the police department with which SSRE could help. Both the police 

department and SSRE quickly realized that circumstances were nearly ideal for a successhl 

research partnership. These circumstances included: 

0 The police department expressed a great need for conducting research. It had conducted 

almost no research or evaluation studies and had only recently obtained hnds to begin 

analyzing its crime reports. - 

1 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
The Police Chief and one of his lieutenants strongly supported research and evaluation 

and were committed to the development and implementation of a long-term research 

program. 

The demographics and other characteristics of Framingham were representative of many 

U.S. cities. Thus the results of the research Partnership would have broad applicability to 

other police departments. 

The department’s highest research priorities involved issues that affect virtually all other 

police departments and also many areas of the criminal justice system. 

From the very beginning, both the Framingham Police Department and SSRE committed 

themselves to a true collaborative effort in which both partners were equals and hlly involved in 

the research process. 

DEVELOPMENT OF A RESEARCH AGENDA 

The Partnership set two goals related to the development of a research agenda: 

0 To identi& and prioritize the Department ’s research nee&. 

0 To create a research plan that spells out specijk steps for implementing a research 

program that addresses the Department’s research needs. 

SSRE mistakenly anticipated the need for a long, involved process during which SSRE 

researchers would help the police begin thinking about their research needs. In actuality, the 

police were well ahead of SSRE in having already identified many pressing research issues. 

Discussions between SSRE and the police quickly elicited even more research needs. In fact, 

progress in this area far exceeded everyone’s most ambitious wishes. Even before reaching the 

half-way point in the project, the Partnership had targeted several critical areas for research and 

. 

began the work of creating research programs to pursue them. Literature reviews were 

@ 

p: 

. .. 

E-; 

conducted, pilot studies designed, and proposals written to obtain hrther fbnding. 

It is reasonable to expect serious problems in a partnership between a police department and 

research organization. The two parties, after all, have very different training and experience. In 

2 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
k 

f 

w .> 

is. 

.‘I .- 

PL 

rf 

3 

p 

..” 

this case, however, the working relationship between the Partners was excellent. Two major 

reasons for the absence of problems were: 

0 All aspects of the project were jointly developed by the Partners. Researchers avoided, 

for example, presenting a detailed research plan for approval by the Police and opted 

instead for fbll participation in its development by all parties. 

A variety of efforts were made by both Partners to familiarize one another with their 

work and points of view. For example, project meetings were held both at the research 

offices and at the Police Department. Also, SSRE staff participated in several ride-alongs 

with police officers on patrol. 

0 

So many research needs were identified that the related goal of prioritizing the research needs 

became paramount. A three-part strategy was identified consisting of the following: 

0 Implementation of the domestic violence study proposed as the centerpiece of the NU 

proposal. 

0 The design of several other research studies with implementation dependent on a 

multitude of circumstances that would dictate the feasibility of each study. 

0 The pursuit of additional fbnding that would allow the continuation of the Partnership 

afker NIJ hnding ended. 

Each of these three areas of activity is described in detail below. 

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESEARCH 

AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE USE OF CELLULAR PHONES TO 

ENFORCE RESTRAINING ORDERS 

Background 

t 

. 

In August 1995, the Framingham Police Department began distributing cellular 

telephones to victims of domestic violence who had taken out restraining orders and were judged 

to be at high risk for further violence. The cellular phones were programmed so they only 

allowed calls to be made either to the Framingham Police Department or to the State Police. 

The rationale behind the program was that cellular phones could provide an immediate 

connection between victim and police when a threat was detected. If the perpetrator knew of the 

3 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. 

phone’s existence and capability, t 

atory criminal a 

d Felson’s (1979) three conditions 

- “the absence of capable guardians 

against crime.” In essence, the police would a1 present if the victim could summon them 

in an instant. However, the phones were expected to be effective even ifthey failed to deter 

perpetrators. By calling the police as soon as they detected a threat, victims would be able to 

minimize the extent of the abuse and simplifjr police efforts to apprehend perpetrators. 

Early indications were that the cellular phone program was extremely successfid. Police 

management believed that it increased victims’ level of perceived safety and also led to increased 

numbers of arrests of violators of restraining orders. Initially, patrol officers resisted the 

program, fearing an increase in paperwork and an overload of calls from panicb women. With 

experience, the officers found the increased paperwork was negligible, and the new calls led to 

increased arrests. Callers were able to pinpoint the whereabouts of offenders who were 

otherwise difficult to locate. The end result was an apparent increase in officer job satisfaction 

deriving directly from information provided over the cellular phones. 

Because of these positive anecdotes, the Partnership decided to conduct a rigorous evaluation 

of the cellular phone intervention. It was predicted that: 

Women with phone would feel safer than women without phones 

Women with phones would travel from their residences more fiequently than women 

without phones. 

Women with phones would experience fewer instances of threats and violence than 

women without phones. 

Arrest rates of offenders in the group with phones would be higher than those in the 

group without phones. 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. 

stic violence to one of 

ims in the experimental iven a cellular phone with which they 

could call. the police in an emergency. Victims in t 

Women came to the attention of the Framingham Police Department when they were a victim 

of a reported domestic assault or a violation of a restraining order. Because of a mandatory 

arrest policy governing domestic violence incidents, offenders were arrested and a case number 

assigned. Women judged to be at high risk for fbrther violence were given a cellular phone and 

not consider for the research study. Women at less risk were considered as potential subjects and 

then reviewed against the following selection criteria. The women had to: 

Live in Framingham and be 21 years old or older. 

Have a traditional telephone but not a cellular phone. 

Have a history of abuse by the offender and expect to be abused again. 

Expect to be contacted by the offender. 

Have or plan to get a restraining order. 

State that they did not want to live with the offender in the foreseeable future - for a 

period of at least six months. 

Have an interest in traveling away from their residence. 

Be willing to accept a cellular phone. 

N 

. 

Mer every reported domestic violence incident, a member of the Framingham Police 

Department Domestic Violence Unit followed up with the victim either in-person or via the 

telephone. During this contact, the oficer administered a questionnaire that served both as a 

screening instrument for the study and also as a pretest. It was expected that pairs of women 

would be matched on the basis of their responses to the screening items. One member of each 

5 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
pair would then be randomly assigned to the experimental condition and the other to the control 

condition. Follow-up questionnaires administered one, three, and six months after women 

entered the study were expected to provide the necessary information for determining the 

effectiveness of the cellular phones. 

Results 

The initial results were completely unexpected. First, there were not as many adult female 

victims of domestic partner abuse as anticipated. Domestic violence incidents often involved 

other types of relationships among family members. Second, almost none of the adult female 

victims of violence fiom their domestic partners met all the criteria for selection into the study. 

Some women wanted to get back together with the offender either immediately or sooner than 

our six-month criterion. Others did not expect to be abused again, and some did not want a 

cellular phone. Responses to other items on the pretest showed that most women felt that they 

could easily call the police if necessary - they did not need a cellular phone. 

The bottom line was that we could not conduct the planned study due to an insufficient 

number of subjects. One alternative was to make the selection criteria less strict. This option 

was rejected because the basic point of the study was to help women who were terrified of 

fbrther violence and wanted to escape fiom the offender. 

Conclusion 

1 

The results of the study were both disappointing and exciting. They were disappointing 

because of the impossibility of conducting the intended study. The Partnership was eager to 

learn the results of an evaluation of the cellular phone intervention, but now this was impossible. 

On the other hand, the results were exciting because of their counterintuitive nature. Both 

the police and SSRE researchers expected that most victims of domestic violence would fit the 

6 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
stereotypic profile of a severely abused woman desperate t 

results showed that few women fit that profile. Instead, m 

abuse. Consequently, it was decided to continue collecting information from female victims o 

domestic violence in order to learn more about the different types of victims. The information - 

provided by these women resulted in the three reports that follow. 

DIFFERENCES AMONG FEMALE VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WHO 

COME TO THE ATTENTION OF THE POLICE 

A hndamental role of our police system is to halt violence and initiate long-term resolution 

through the criminal justice system that will prevent hture occurrences and punish perpetrators. 

For the police to fhlfill this role, the crime must necessarily be reported to them. Yet, several 

studies have estimated that only small percentages of domestic violence assaults, one of the most 

common acts of violence against women, are reported to the police. Using the National Crime 

Victimization Survey data, Bachman and Coker (1995) estimated that 56% of battering incidents 

are reported to police. Kantor and Straus’s (1990) figures are much lower. They estimate that as 

few as 7% to 14% of intimate partner assaults are reported to the police. 

Who are these female victims of domestic partner violence who come t attention ofthe 

police? Existing information is sparse and indirect. Berk et al. (1984) explored some of the * 

factbrs that influence the decision of both victims and bystanders to call the police, and several 

studies have documented overrepresentation by lower socioeconomic groups among victims seen 

by the police (Black, 1980; Hamberger and Hastings, 1993). Victims obtained from other 

settings - not from the police - have been asked about their use of the police. For example, 

Pagelow (1 98 1) interviewed women in shelters and Gondol 

(1 983) located victims through newspapers. Roughly half of the victims in these studies had 

contacted the police, and these women tended to be the more severely abused victims. Recently, 

7 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Wiist and McFarlane (1 998) a1 

utilization of the police. They 

urban public health clinics and that those who had used the police had experienced more 

severe abuse during the past year than those who had not. Together, results from these studies 

suggest that it is the most seriously abused victims of domestic violence who are most likely to 

d a direct relationship between severity of violence and 

abused, pregnant, Hispanic patients receiving care in 

come to the attention of the police. 

But none of these studies drew their subject samples from the population of all domestic 

violence victims who come to the attention of the police. One study obtained subjects from a 

population of the most desperate victims, victims who sought safety in shelters. Other studies 

relied on those victims who saw and responded to newspaper advertisements. Another focused 

on a specific ethnic group obtaining prenatal care. 

Do existing studies provide an accurate description of all the victims seen by the police? 

Do some of these victims experience less severe violence than those who have already been 

studied? Do they not access shelters or the criminal justice system because they have different 

expectations of future violence? And how do these women compare to each other? 

This study was an exploratory effort to fill in the gaps of current knowledge about female 

victims of domestic partner violence who come to the attention of the police. Unlike previous 

research, this study sought to describe the entire population of domestic victims seen by the 

police. Subjects were identified on the basis of their having been in contact with the police 

I 

. 

rather than indirectly through some other means of recruitment. 

Methods 

The study was conducted in Framingham, Massachusetts, a Boston suburb of roughly 65,000 

citizens with a police department of 11 1 offjcers (including the chief and all supervisors). 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Framhgham, well-known bec ong-standing Framingham Heart Stu& closely a 

R !4 represents the United States in its demographic composition. 

& 

Subjects for the study consisted of consecutive female victims who came to the attention of L 

the police because of a telephone call requesting police intervention in a domestic violence 

incident involving a partner over the course of one year. These women were subsequently 

interviewed by members of the Department’s domestic violence unit as soon as was practical 

following the initial incident - usually within a day or two. When possible, officers interviewed 

the victims in person. If the victim was not readily available for an in-person interview, officers 

conducted the interview over the telephone. 

r 4. 

8 c.. 

Y 

The interview protocol included multiple-choice questions asking victims about past 

incidents involving the abuser, the severity of the abuse, their level of fear, and expectations 1 

regarding the future. a 

Several questions were added to the interview protocol after roughly one quarter of the 

A interviews had been completed. Consequently, the number of responses varies fiom item to 

item. Finally, the interview protocol was kept quite short in order to obtain the cooperation of 

both the police officer interviewers and the subjects. 

i2 

Results Q 

. Three members of the police department’s domestic violence unit interviewed 100 adult 

female victims of domestic violence over the course of a year beginning in September 1997. 

Five of these victims were interviewed on more than one occasion. Only the first interview is 

included in this report. One-third of the interviews were conducted in-person, while the other 

two-thirds were conducted over the telephone. Most of the victims (72%) called for police help 

themselves, while in the other 28% of the cases, someone other than the victim called the police. 

9 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
L .- 

Half (53%) of the victims were living with the abuser at the time of the incident and half 1 

1 

1 

(47%) were not. Just over half (58%) of the victims reported that children under the age of 18 i" 

I:.- 

fwere living with them. 

Expectations of future abuse. Exhibit 1 shows that a fourth of the sample believed that hture 

abuse by the offender was eitherfairly likely or very likely. These women constitute the victims 

on which most research concentrates. They are generally the focus of legislation and regulations 

aimed at protecting victims of domestic violence and at helping them escape from situations of 

chronic, severe violence. 

100% 

80% 

60% 

40% 

20% 

0% 

Exhibit 1: 

Victims' Expectations of Future Abuse by the Offender 

35% 

26% 

14% 

Not Slighlly Somewhat Fairly 

I 

ve'y Likely Likely Likely Likely Likely 

However, the most striking result in Exhibit 1 is the number of women at the opposite 

end of the continuum. Over one-third of the victims stated that fbture abuse by the offender was 

Not Likely. Another quarter of the victims reported that fbture violence was only Slightly Likely. 

Combining these two groups shows that hlly 61% ofthe women who answered this item stated a 

10 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
P 

'9 

t 

P 

that there was little or no prospect of hture violence. This seems to defy the current stereotype 

of the domestic violence victim as a woman caught in an unending cycle of violence and 

certainly contradicts the profiles of women who have been the subjects of previous research 

. studies 

do expectations of fbture violence correspond with levels of fear and reports of previous abuse in 

sensible ways. 

ill 

Fear of the offender. Any victim of violence expecting fbture violence from the offender 

would be expected to fear that offender. The situation is less clear for victims not expecting 

hture violence. While they probably were fkightened during the violent incident, fear seems 

inconsistent with a belief that the offender will not ham them in the fbture. As expected, 

Exhibit 2 shows that, in general, victims expecting fiirther abuse tended to express fear of the 

offender, while those believing fbrther abuse was unlikely were unafraid (X2 =75.8, pX.05). 

Over three-quarters (78%) of women believing that hture abuse was Fairly or Very likely were 

, 

Very afraid of the offender, and just one of these women was Not apaid. The pattern was 

reversed for women who thought that future abuse was Not likely. Only one was Very afraid, 

and 78% were Not aj-aid. 

11 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. 

Exhibit 2: 

Fear of the Offender by Victims' Expectations of Future Abuse 

A similar, strong association exists between expectations of hture abuse and estimates of 

the severity of the future abuse (X2 =63.2, pC.05). Three-quarters of those victims who believed 

that future abuse was Fairly or Very likely also believed that they would be seriously injured by 

the offender. Conversely, three-quarters of the victims who believed that fhture abuse was Not 

likely expected that if there were another incident of abuse, it would not injure them seriously. 

Previous abuse. How is it possible, when we have come to expect the opposite, that a large 

number of victims seen by the police do not expect htther violence fiom the perpetrator? The 

most likely explanation is that they viewed the violence as an isolated incident in contrast to 

victims of numerous assaults from the same offender who probably realize that violence is likely 

to happen again. Exhibit 3 shows the relationship between victims' reports of past abuse by the 

% 

offender and their expectations of fiture abuse fiom the same individual. The five response 

options to the question asking about hture abuse are collapsed into three categories: (1) Not 

likely, (2) Slightly or somewhat likely, and (3) Fairly or very likely. Expectations of fbture abuse 

are significantly associated with reports of past abuse by the offender (X2=7.9, pC.05). Victims 

who had not previously been abused tended to believe that fbture abuse was unlikely, while 

victims with a history of abuse tended to expect that the offender would abuse them again. More 

12 

i: 

.,. 

_-.-. 

, .- : 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
specifically, over half (54%) of the victims who had not been 

future abuse was Not likely. Only 13% of these victims expected that future abuse was Fairly or 

' usly abused believed that 

100% 

80% 

6 60% 

; 

* 

c 0 

f 40% n 

20% 

0% 

Very likely. Conversely, 23% of previously abused victims stated that hture abuse was Not 

likely, while 36% expected that future abuse was Fairly or Very likely to recur. 

Exhibit 3: 

Reports of Past Abuse by Victims' Expectations of Future Abuse 

- 

Lzl ONo Past Abuse 

54% 

41 % 

36% 33% 

13% 

Not SlighttylSomewhat FairlyNery 

Likely Likely Likely 

The least clear responses in Exhibit 3 are those ten victims of previous abuse who reported 

that fbture abuse was Not likely. Closer inspection, however, shows that eight of the ten were 

planning a change in their relationship with the offender that they believed would prevent fiture 

occurrences of abuse. Five of the ten planned to obtain a restraining order, and three of the 

victims not intending to obtain a restraining order indicated that they wanted a permanent 

separation from the offender. 

Another question about previous abuse asked if the victim had ever obtained a restraining 

order against this offender. The results showed a parallel association between expectations of 

hture abuse and previous abuse (X2=6.3, p<.05). Women who had ever obtained a restraining 

13 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Victims were asked if a restraining or ime of the incident. Not 

surprisingly, the pattern of results is nearly the same as for the question asking whether the 

victim had ever obtained a restraining order, though the Chi-square value of 5.2 was not 

significant. Unfortunately, 41% of the victims who had already obtained a restraining order at 

the time of the incident still expected that hture abuse was Fairly or Very likely. Apparently, 

they realize that the restraining order will not protect them. 

Desired future relationship with the offender. One of the most dramatic disparities among 

victims differing in expectations of repeated abuse is their desired fbture relationship with the 

- 

offender (X2=14.3, p<.05). As Exhibit 4, and not surprisingly, nearly all (87%) of the 23 women 

who believed that hrther abuse was FuirZy or Very ZikeZy desired a permanent separation from 

the offender. For women who felt that fiture abuse was Not ZikeZy, only half (48%) wanted a 

permanent separation. The discrepancy between the 

back together with the offender is eve 

continuing abuse was Fairly or Very ZikeZy wanted to get together right away with the offender, 

ers of victims wanting to get right 

re striking. Just one (4%) of the victims who felt that 

while 12 (41%) of those believing hrther abuse was Not likely wanted to get back together. 

Thus, the higher the expectation of hture violence, the lower the victim's desire to return to the 

abuser. 

14 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
100% 

80% 

E 5 60% 

5 

6 

5 g 40% 

n 

20% 

c 

0% 

Exhibit 4: 

Desired Future Relationship with the Offender by 

Victims’ Expectations of Future Abuse 

48% 

41 96 

09% 

mMore Than 3 Months Apart 

-Less Than 3 Months Apart 

em 

n 

Not SlighUy/Somewhat FairlyNery 

Likely Likely Likely 

Demographic variables. There were no significant associations between victims’ expectations 

of future violence and two demographic variables. Whether or not the offender lived with the 

victim was unrelated to victims’ expectations of future violence. Nor was the presence of 

children under the age of 18 related to expectations of fbture violence. 

While the victims’ ability to support themselves was not statistically associated with their 

expectations of kture violence, the pattern of responses suggests a commonsense connection. 

Victims who were able to support themselves generally rated the prospects of fbture abuse as Not 

I 

at all likely, Financial independence provides these women with options not available to those 

who could not support themselves and, therefore, offenders may be less likely to risk alienating 

them through violence 

Discussion 

As public awareness about domestic violence builds, and more calls to end the violence are 

made, the police are gradually becoming more involved in responding to domestic violence. 

15 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Given what we know about the nature of domestic violence, can we hypoth 

the women in this latter group will not only be abused again, but be abused again so severely - 

they flee the situation? If so, this would suggest that police intervention represents an ideal 

opportunity to try to prevent fbture violence, perhaps the last opportunity for such an 

intervention. Conversely, for those women who expect little fkture violence, and ultimately 

experience little violence, how should police action differ? 

Therefore, one of the most immediate questions raised by this study is whether greater efforts 

should be directed at tailoring the police response to the nature of the domestic violence incident. 

If police interaction precedes victims accessing shelters or the judicial system, are there steps 

that the police can initiate to prevent the escalation of violence? It may be unreasonable to 

expect a universal strategy, such as mandatory arrest, to be effective when applied to ’ 

fbndamentally different types of domestic violence incidents. So what are the different types of 

domestic violence and what responses work best for each? 

Another fbndamental question is whether the first-time incidents of domestic violence 

encountered ,in this study were isolated events, or the beginning of a cycle of abuse. 

Longitudinal research is necessary to track these cases and learn how many repeat and how many 

escalate in severity of violence. 

This study helps fill in the gaps in our existing 

attention of the police. But perh 

search is needed to better under 

victims of domestic violence and the responses that can best help them. 

17 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
*_ 

NS OF THE POLICE BY VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SEEN AT e 

A SUBURBAN POLICE DEPARTMENT 

For victims of domestic violence, the police typically serve as their initial point of contact 

criminal justice system. And yet, surprisingly little is known about battered women’s 

perceptions of the police. The sparse information available on this topic is hrther limited by the 

sources of the data. As Erez and Belknap (1998) note, most reports of battered women’s 

., . D interactions with the police and other authorities have been based on information provided either $2 

** = directly by the authorities or indirectly through records created by the authorities. Those studies 5% 

that question victims about the police tend to ask only women who have sought help in battered 

women’s shelters. This therefore leaves unexplored the perceptions of the police by the much 

larger number of victims who have contact with the police but do not seek help fiom shelters. c.- r- 

.* 

0 *.:. ,.-“ 

While research into battered women’s perceptions of the police is scarce, the few existing 

‘C k% studies suggest that victims’ perceptions can have an important impact on their behavior. 

Fischer and Rose (1 995) found that victims’ willingness to seek a restraining order was heavily 

influenced by police encouragement. Conversely, Brown (1998) showed that victims were more 

likely to report feelings of self-blame when they experienced negative treatment fiom the police. 

Early research indicates that, overall, battered women tend to view the police as 

somewhat helpful. Kennedy and Homant (1983) asked women from three Detroit-area shelter 

homes about their satisfaction with the police response to their family disturbance. Twenty-eight 

. 1* 

percent reported that the police were very helphl, while 30% rated the police as not heipfil or as 

having made things worse. The remaining 42% 

little helpkl. 

men saw the police as having been a 

18 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. 

98) suggests that little has changed for 

ies and an increasing public awareness of 

mail survey with battered women 

who had been involved with a victim assistance program affiliated with the prosecutor’s office in 

two counties. Unfortunately, only 10% of the victims responded to the survey. These 

respondents reported a wide range of police reactions, fiom understanding and assistance to 

efforts aimed at discouraging efforts to prosecute the batterer. When asked about their level of 

satisfaction with the authorities they encountered, victims ranked the police lowest. The authors 

summarize their findings along with the reviewed research: “Criminal processing authorities 

(e.g., police, prosecutors, and judges) who offer appropriate responses are rare, and receiving 

meaningfbl assistance is generally a random event.” Ep.2521 

One generally more positive view of police treatment of battered women was obtained by 

Taylor (1995) as reported by Crowell and “Burgess (1996). Taylor surveyed 250 New York City 

victims of battering who called 91 1 for help and asked what type of help they wanted fiom the 

police and whether they received that help. Large percentages of victims wanted help with an 

order of protection (59%), counseling (43%), and discussion of troubling feelings (42%). 

Seventy-nine percent of the victims who wanted help with an order of protection received that 

service. The comparable figures for counseling and discussion of troubling feelings were 65% 

v 

. 

and 68%, respectively. But these results, more favorable than those found by Erez and Belknap 

are fiom victims who may have suffered less than those who accessed a victim assistance 

program, as studied by Erez and Belknap Finally, Miller and Krull(1997) interviewed many 

victims who were eligible for three of the National Institute of Justice-fbnded replications 

Sherman and Berk’s (1984) domestic violence study of mandatory arrest. They catalog the types 

19 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
of help victims reported receiving from the police and the problems that victims felt the police 

caused. However, the authors do not discuss the impact of the police actions on victims' 

perceptions of the police or on their intentions to use or not use the police in the future. 

Therefore, the existing research about the perceptions domestic violence victims hold of 

police is limited. It generally includes only those victims who have accessed shelters as a result 

of their situations; only one, to our knowledge, studies victims who come in contact with the 

police. Other research is limited in its small sample size. Nevertheless, the research does 

suggest that victims' perceptions of the police can have an important impact on their behavior. 

Overall, battered women tend to view the police as somewhat helpfbl. But differences in 

findings among populations studied suggest that victims' perceptions may vary depending on the 

severity of abuse the victims suffered. Those who access the police by calling 91 1 reported more 

favorable opinions than victims who accessed a victim assistance program. 

The goal of the present study was therefore to add to this sparse body of knowledge about 

domestic violence victims' perceptions of the police. The primary objective was to learn what 

victims wanted from the police, the extent to which they perceived that they obtained what they 

wanted, and how satisfied they were with the actions of the police. 

The present study differs in three important ways from previous research: by its subject 

sample, by the policing environment, and by the interviewers. First, the sample consisted of all 

domestic violence victims who came to the attention of the police either because they or 

someone else called for assistance (not necessarily using 91 1). While the subject population is 

similar to Taylor's (1995) population of women who dialed 9 1 1, it differs from previous studies 

where subjects had accessed shelters and victim assistance programs. 

20 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Second, the police department involved in the study had y instituted a ma 

arrest policy and had established a domestic violence unit headed by a lieutenant sympathetic to 

the plight of battered women. Thus, the policing environment at the time of this stud 

been more favorable toward domestic violence victims than in earlier studies of victims’ 

perceptions of the police. 

have 

A third difference between the present and previous studies of victim perceptions of the 

police was the use of police officers as interviewers. Contacting victims of domestic violence 

and obtaining frank opinions from them about their experience is a daunting task under any 

circumstances. The difficulties are compounded when victims present themselves at 

unpredictable times over a period of many months. The solution chosen for this study was to use 

R B g 

police officers assigned to a domestic violence unit for interviewing victims. There were many 

advantages to this approach. These officers contacted victims of domestic violence following an 

incident as part of the their normal duties. Officers assigned to the domestic violence unit were 

F“ 

ki 

judged to be interested in and sensitive to the plight of female victims. These officers also 

worked closely with victim advocates from other organizations. Of great importance, most 

victims were willing to speak with police officers about the extremely sensitive issues regarding 

their abuse. [’ 

ki 

The main argument against using police officers to interview victims about their 

perceptions of the police is, of course, the possibility that victims feel intimidated by the police 

and respond favorably to please the interviewer. In the present study, the officers conducting the 

I. 

i 

interviews were not those who responded to domestic violence calls and, in fact, had never 

t 

responded - their job was to follow-up with victims after other officers responded to a call for 

r 

assistance. In order to standardize the interview, the officers were given a protocol to follow 

t 

21 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
consisting almost entirely of multiple-choice questions. In addition, the interview protocol asked 

victims to rate several aspects of police actions during the present incident and also a past 

incident. Uniformly positive ratings on all these items would suggest that victims were &aid to 

express their true opinions of the police. 

Methods 

The study was conducted in Framingham, Massachusetts, a Boston suburb of roughly 

65,000 citizens with a police department of 11 1 officers (including the chief and all supervisors). 

Framingham, well-known because of the long-standing Framingham Heart Study, closely 

represents the United States in its demographic composition. 

i" . sc %' 

Subjects for the study consisted of consecutive female victims who came to the attention 

of the police because of a telephone call requesting police intervention in a domestic violence 

incident involving a partner over the course of one year. These women were subsequently 

interviewed by members of the Department's domestic violence unit as soon as was practical 

following the initial incident - usually within a day or two. When possible, officers interviewed 

the victims in person. If the victim was not readily available for an in-person interview, officers 

conducted the interview over the telephone. 

The interview protocol included questions asking victims to rate their satisfaction with I 

L.. 

Q 

the officers who responded to the most recent call for assistance using a five-point Likert scale. 

Victims who had been involved in an earlier domestic violence incident where the police had 

been called were also asked to rate their satisfaction with the officers who responded at that time. 

Another question asked specifically whether the police officers informed the victim about 

options regarding restraining orders. In addition, victims were asked what they had wanted from 

22 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
*? . 

-. 

time of the inc 

specific assistance. 

a 

Several questions were 

interviews had been completed 

item. Finally, the interview protocol was kept quite short in order to obtain the cooperation of 

both the police officer interviewers and the subjects. 

Results 

Three members of the police department’s domestic violence unit interviewed 100 adult 

female victims of domestic violence over the course of a year beginning in September 1997. 

Five of these victims were interviewed on more than one occasion. Only the first interview is 

included in this report. One-third of the interviews were conducted in-person, while the other 

two-thirds were conducted over the telephone. Most of the victims (72%) called for police help 

themselves, while in the other 28% of the cases, someone other than the victim called the police. 

I’ . 

i* 

Half (53%) of the victims were living with the abuser at the time of the incident and half 

(47%) were not. Just over half (58%) of the victims reported that children under the age of 18 

were living with them. 

Victims’ answers to questions about their level of fear and restraining orders reflect the 

broad range of violence involved in these cases. When asked whether they were frightened by 

the offender, 25% of the sample stated that they were Very Afraid. At the other extreme, 36% of 

the victims reported that they were Not Afraid of their assailant. The remaining respondents 

reported that they were Slightly Afraid (12%)’ Somewhat Afraid (21%), or Fairly Afraid (6%). A 

restraining order was in effect at the time of the interview for one quarter of the sample. 

23 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
I. 

Did the police help you get or enforce a restraining order? 

Did the police arrest the offender? 

Did the police help you find counseling? 

Types of assistance provided by th olice. All police offic onding 

No Yes N 

59% 41% 22 

8% 92% 36 

13% 88% 32 

t' 

to domestic 

violence calls were expected by their superiors to inform victims of their options regarding f.- 

5- 

restraining orders. To test whether officers filfilled this requirement, victims were asked if they r 

knew what a restraining order was and athey knew how to obtain one. Virtually all victims - 

knew what a restraining order was (only one did not know) and knew how to get one (just two 

said they did not know how to obtain a restraining order). While some of the victims must have 

already known about restraining orders, the police officers responding to the domestic violence 5:; 

& calls appear to have made sure that all victims were aware of restraining orders. p 

A series of paired items asked victims whether they wanted particular types of assistance 

fiom the police and whether or not they received that type of assistance. Exhibit 6 presents the 

results fiom these pairs of items. Row 1 shows that 33 of the 36 victims who wanted help 

getting or enforcing a restraining order felt that the police provided them with that type of 

assistance. Three other victims indicated that the police did not help them get or enforce a 

restraining order. 

The second row in Exhibit 5 shows that the police were much less successfbl in helping 

victims obtain counseling. Only nine of the 26 (35%) women who wanted help accessing 

counseling felt that the police aided them. Thirteen of the 26 (50%) responded that the police did 

not help them find counseling, and the remaining four subjects did not respond to the item. 

Exhibit 5: 

Percent of Victims Who Received the Help They Requested From the Police 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Police department policy required officers to arrest batterers, whether or not the victim 

made a request. Roughly the first third of the subjects were asked if the police did indeed make 

an arrest. They did. In 28 out of 3 3 instances, the police arrested the offender. Because of the 

high police compliance with the requirement for arrest, this question was dropped from 

subsequent interviews in order to include other questions. 

Ratings of police assistance. An item asking about reasons for not seeking a restraining order 

provides indirect evidence of victims’ views of police responsiveness to their plight. Victims 

who had not already obtained a restraining order and also said they were not planning to seek 

one were read a list of possible reasons and asked to indicate which, if any, applied. One of 

these possible reasons was that ne police won’t do anything if he violates the Restraining 

Order. None of the 28 victims for whom the question was asked noted this option as a reason for 

not seeking a restraining order. This suggests a strongly positive view among victims that police 

would assist them if needed in enforcing a restraining order. 

Victims were also directly asked how helphl they felt the police were when responding 

to the current domestic violence incident. Exhibit 6 shows that 75% of the victims who were 

asked this question responded with the highest rating of Very Helpfirl. Only nine percent of the 

victims gave police either the lowest rating ofNot HeIpJirl or the next-to-lowest rating of Slightly 

Help_firl. The remaining 16% of the victims rated the police response as Somewhat Helpful. 

25 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Exhibit 6: 

Helpfulness of the Police During the Current Incident 

100% 

80% 

E" 60% .e 

5 - 

0 - 

c 

40% 

n 

20% 

0% 

8% - 3% 

7% 9% 

75% 

Not Slightly Somewhat Fairly very 

Helpful Helpful Helpful Helpful Helpful 

Victims' reactions to the police were also assessed in another way with a question asking 

-I_* if the victim would call the police in the kture for a similar incident. Here, an even larger 

percentage (8 1%) gave the most positive response of Definitely Will. Another seven percent 

reported that they Probably Will call the police in the fbture for a similar incident. Only six 

percent of the respondents said that they would Definite& Not or Probably Not call the police for 

a similar incident (see Exhibit 7). I g 

26 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
e. 

Likelihood of Calling ice 

During a Similar incident in the Future 

80% 

60% 

40% 

20% 

0% 

4% 1% 

6% 7% 

Definitely Probably Not Probably Definitely 

Not Not Sure Will Will 

Even these smaller negative responses may not reflect a failure of the police to act 

appropriately. The eight victims who indicated either a reluctance to call the police in the kture 

or said they were Not Sure were asked for their reasons. Two explained that they feared the 

offender would harm them if the police were called in the hture. Thus their desire to avoid 

police involvement may stem from characteristics of the abuser rather than from actions of the 

police. Five of the eight victims reported that the presence of the police made the situation 

worse. Without additional information, it is impossible to know whether matters worsened due 

to ineffective police actions or because of the abusers' reactions to the police. 

N 

. 

Two other items in this series of questions about victims' perceptions of the police 

handling of their domestic violence incident produced clear, negative reactions to the police. 

One victim would not call the police in the hture because The poZice treatedyou badly. Two 

other victims reported that the police were not helpful in the situation. 

27 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
The goal of this study was to add to t 

ctims' perceptions of the police arch addresses what victims wanted from 

the police, the extent to which they perceived that they obtained what they wanted, and how i 

satisfied they were with the actions of the police. Specifically, the study asked victims if they 

were satisfied in the assistance provided by the police in obtaining restraining orders, counseling, 

and arrest of the batterer. 

Taken together, the victims' responses to several items provide surprisingly strong 

support for police actions across the wide range of women who came to the attention of a 

suburban police department as a result of domestic violence calls. Victims' direct ratings of the 

helphlness of the police were very positive. Even stronger support for the police resulted from a 

question asking if the victims would be willing to call for police help with a similar incident if it 

should arise in the future. 

Questions about specific types of assistance produced mixed results. The police were 

seen as very helpful by those who wanted help obtaining or enforcing a restraining order. On the 

other hand, many victims who wanted help finding counseling faulted the police for failing to 

provide that help. Given that the studied community requires officers to arrest batterers, whether 

or not the victim made a request, compliance by the police was so high that the research team 

decided to remove the question fiom the protocol. 

. 

Victims' willingness to be open and honest with a police officer interviewing them about 

What about the others? A pair of items asking about previous involvement with the police 

28 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. ' 

a provides more evidence, albeit indirect, that many victims gave honest respons 

7 interviewers. 

When victims were asked if the police had ever been called before due to a domestic 

violence incident involving the current offender, 29 said that they had. Twenty-eight of these 

victims then answered a follow-up question asking how helpful the police had been during that 

incident. While generally positive, the responses were considerably less enthusiastic about the 

police performance than those given to the question about the police actions in the current 

. 4 

%y 

9 

4 

- 

w 

.'f 

r '. 

.- 

@ incident. Fifty-four percent of these victims said that the police had been Very Helpful, 

compared to 75% who gave this response to the current incident. Eighteen percent rated the 

police as Not HeIpfuZ in the previous incident, compared to 6% for the current incident. 

'-$ 

** 

I 

/- Comparison of the helpfulness ratings of the previous and the current domestic violence i .: 

!:{ 

P 

incidents helps validate the results of this study in two ways. First, the greater negativity 

expressed toward the police regarding the previous incident suggests that a substantial number of 

the victims were comfortable expressing honest opinions with the police interviewer. Second, 

._ 

ir 

the increase in positive reactions to the police is consistent with a recent, concerted effort made 

by the police department to improve police response to domestic violence incidents. 

,Nevertheless, ultimately, the study should be replicated using non-police personnel as 

interviewers in order to hrther and substantially validate the findings. However, if we accept 

these results as valid, this research suggests that these women were generally more satisfied with 

the police than those examined in previous research by Kennedy & Homant (1983) and Erez & 

Belknap (1 998). However, Taylor found results similar to this study in a survey of a more 

comparable population. Of the 250 New York City victims of battering who called 91 1 for help, 

large percentages of victims wanted help with an order of protection (59%), counseling (43%), 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
and discussion of troubling feelings (42%). Seventy-nine percent of the victims who w 

help with an order of protection received that service; 65% received counseling assistance and 

68% discussion of troubling feelings. 

And yet, it remains to be more fblly examined how much effect the environment has on 

victims' reactions, given that the police department involved in this study had recently instituted 

a mandatory arrest policy and had established a domestic violence unit headed by a lieutenant 

sympathetic to the plight of battered women. Thus, the victims' generally positive reaction to the 

police may reflect a policing environment that was unusually favorable toward domestic violence 

victims. 

At the same time, more research is needed on what is reasonable for victims of domestic 

violence to expect from police officers and therefore what role, if any, beyond law enforcement 

police officers can hlfill. Are police only expected to address the immediate concerns of 

arresting the batterer and assisting victims with obtaining or enforcing restraining orders, given 

that these actions relate to law enforcement? Or are police officers the last best opportunity to 

prevent fbture abuse by aiding victims in obtaining other types of assistance, such as counseling, 

that fall outside traditional policework? 

What is clear is that, as communities become more and more aware of the complexities of 

domestic violence, additional research is needed to identify the most effective role for the police. 

SOCIAL SUPPORTS CAN BE HELPFUL BUT MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT 

FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 

As the public's awareness of domestic violence has grown in the past several years and 

calls for measures to end domestic violence have increased, gaps in existing social science 

research have been exposed. Many observers wonder how women become victims of abuse and 

30 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
why their friends and family, their “s 

themselves fi-om a violent situation. 

upports,” do not intervene to help them extricate 

Surprisingly little research has examined the role social supports play for victims of 

domestic violence. The main finding has been that victims of domestic violence perceive 

themselves as having less support from formal and informal networks of family and friends than 

non-battered women (Mitchell and Hodson, 1983; Barnett, Martinez, and Keyson, 1996). A 

perceived paucity of support is hrther associated with high levels of self-blame (Barnett, 

Martinez, and Keyson, 1996) and poorer psychological health (Mitchell and Hodson, 1983). 

Barriers to support can exist both because few sources of social support exist and/or because 

available social supports are ineffective. Hilberman and Munson (1977-1978) suggest that 

abusive men tend to isolate their partners from potential supports. Even when informal networks 

of family and friends do exist, victims may feel uncomfortable reaching out, or these individuals 

may be reluctant to interfere in the victims’ private lives (Mitchell and Hodson, 1983). 

When battered women do seek support, the support they receive is often insufficient 

(Hoe 1990). Tan et al. (1995) asked women who had been in domestic violence shelters about 

their social supports. The women reported having, on average, over seven individuals in various 

areas of social support, but their level of satisfaction with these supports was only slightly 

positive, on average (4.7 on a 1 to 7 scale where 1 was terrible and 7 was extremelypleused). 

1 

Overall, women who were more satisfied with their social supports reported being more pleased 

with the quality of their lives and less depressed. On the other hand, satisfaction with social 

supports was not related either to the number of social supports or to continued involvement with 

assailants. 

31 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. 

Most research on d ' violence and social supports has investigated victims of 

severe abuse. Typically, subjects for these studies were in or had been in domestic violence 

shelters. 

,. 

The purpose of the present study was to begin exploring social supports in relationship to 

domestic violence in the lives of victims at the time they came to the attention of the police. 

These women represent a broad population in that they did not necessarily suffer severe abuse, as 

did the usual subjects of studies on social supports. The most basic questions posed by this study 

were whether these victims had social supports and, if so, whether they perceived these social 

supports as being helpful. Another fbndamental question explored similarities and differences 

between victims with and without social supports and how these victims compared to those in 

previous studies. 

It was anticipated that women suffering fiom domestic violence, but not so severely they 

: were yet in shelters, would in fact have some access to social supports, but that these social 

supports were obviously not enough to end the violence. 

Methods L. 

The study was conducted in Framingham, Massachusetts, a Boston suburb of roughly 

65,000 citizens with a police department of 11 1 officers (including the chief and all supervisors). 

Framingham, well-known because of the long-standing Framingham Heart Stucj? closely 

represents the United States in its demographic composition. 

, 

Subjects for the study consisted of consecutive female victims who came to the attention 

of the police because of a telephone call requesting police intervention in a domestic violence 

incident over the course of a year. These women were subsequently interviewed by members of 

0 

the Department's domestic violence unit as soon as was practical following the initial incident - 

32 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
I’ 

L 

c 

-. 

usually within a day or two. When possible, officers interviewed the victims in person. Ifthe 

victim was not readily available for an in-person interview, officers conducted the interview over 

the telephone. 

The availability of social supports was ascertained with a question that asked, Is there 

anyone nearby to whom you can turn for support in dealing with your domestic violence 

problems? Victims’ level of satisfaction with these social supports was measured with an item 

that asked, How helpful will they be ifyou ask for help? 

The interview protocol was kept quite short in order to obtain the cooperation of both the 

police officer interviewers and the subjects. 

Results 

Three members of the police department’s domestic violence unit interviewed 100 adult 

female victims of domestic violence over the course of a year beginning in September 1997. 

Five of these victims were interviewed on more than one occasion. Only the first interview is 

included in this report. One-third of the interviews were conducted in-person, while the other 

two-thirds were conducted over the telephone. Most of the victims (72%) called for police help 

themselves, while in the other 28% of the cases, someone other than the victim called the police. 

This suggests that most victims felt empowered enough to request assistance for themselves. 

Half (53%) of the victims were living with the abuser at the time of the incident and half 

(47%) were not. Just over half (58%) of the victims reported that children under the age of 18 

were living with them. 

Victims’ answers to questions about their level of fear and restraining orders reflect the 

broad range of violence involved in these cases. When asked whether they were frightened by 

the offender, 25% of the sample stated that they were Very Afiaid. At the other extreme, 36% of 

33 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
the victims reported that they were Not Afiaid sailant. The r 

reported that they were SZightZy Afraid (12%), Somewhat Afraid (21%), or Fairly Afraid (6%). A 

restraining order was in effect at the time of the interview for one quarter of the sample. 

._ 

The existence of social supports. Nearly all the victims of domestic violence seen by the 

Framingham police reported having social supports. Ninety-one percent of all victims answered 

that there was someone nearby to whom they could turn for support in dealing with their 

- 

domestic violence problem. Furthermore, many victims noted that several social supports were 

available to them - the number ranged from one to 20. Half of the sample reported having access 

to four or more social supports. 

Sixty-four of the 86 (74%) victims who indicated that they had social supports rated the 

helpfhlness of their social supports. Almost all (88%) of these victims of domestic violence gave 

their social supports the highest possible rating of Very HeZpfiZ. None of the women used the 

lowest of five options, Not at all HelpJirZ, to describe their social supports. 

Social supports are helpful. Victims included in the study were divided into two groups in 

order to explore the role of social supports. One group consisted of victims who both had social 

supports and rated those social supports as Very HeZpfiZ. The comparison group combined those 

victims who had no social supports with other victims who had social supports but rated those 

supports as less than Very He@$.d. 

Responses to questions asking victims about their ability to support themselves 

financially show a clear distinction between social and financial support. There was no 

difference between the two groups with regard to their ability to support themselves financially. 

In both groups, about 60% reported being able to support themselves financially, while about 

34 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. 

40% could not. Thus, the existence of social supports doe pond to a victim's financial 

status. 

Victims with helpfbl social supports were significantly likely than those without to 

have called the police themselves, as opposed to someone else calling on their behalf (X2=4.6, 

pC.05). Most (79%) of the victims with helphl social supports called the police themselves. 

Victims without helpfbl social supports were evenly split - in half the cases the victim called the 

police and in half someone else called (see Exhibit 8). The possible reasons for this are many: 

victims with social supports may perceive themselves as more empowered to call for assistance, 

those without may feel more isolated and less willing to seek help; those with social support may 

be more willing to bring the authorities into the situation because they feel they have the support 

to change their situation if need be, those without may not be willing to jeopardize the situation, 

violent though it may be; and/or those with social support may be stronger psychologically. 

Exhbit 8: 

Percent of Calls to the Police by Victims Versus Someone Else: 

Comparison of Victims With and Without Helpful Social Supports 

loo% I 

IOVictims Placed the Call -Someone Else Called I 

1 79% 80% ,, 

60% 

.. 

40% 

21 k 

20% 

0% 

Victims with 

Helpful Supports 

Victim5 with 

No Helpful Supports 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Several questions asked victims about their expectations for the future. While none of 

the comparisons between the two groups of victims was significant, the pattern of answers is 

consistent and suggests important differences. For example, nearly half (47%) of the victims 

without helpfbl supports believed that it was Very LikeZy that their assailant would harm them 

-. 

again, while just 19% of those with helpfbl social supports shared this belief (see Exhibit 9). A 

similar item asked subjects to estimate how willing the offender was to leave them alone in the 

future. As with the previous item, 46% of victims without helpful social supports believed that 

their assailant was Not WiZZing to leave them alone, while just 14% of those with helpful social 

supports had the same reaction (see Exhibit 10). Therefore, the existence of social supports 

suggests a more positive outlook. 

100% 

80% 

{ 60% 

g 

c 

f 

2 40% L 

20% 

0% 

Exhibit 9: 

Victims' Expectations of Future Abuse: 

Comparison of Victims With and Without Helpful Social Supports 

7 25% 

-Slightly Likely 

WSomewhat Likely 

W Fairly Likely 

A?% 

Victims with Victims with 

Helpful Supports No Helpful Supports 

36 

! 

a 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Exhibit 10: 

Victims’ Beliefs About the Offender‘s Willingness to Leave Them Alone: 

Comparison of Victims With and Without Helpful Social Supports 

100% 

80% 

E 60% 

E 0 

Y 

c 

40% 2 

20% 

Ad% 

17% 17% 

0% 

Victims with 

Helpful Social Supports 

- 46% 

-Slightly Willing 

-Somewhat Willing 

mFairly Willing 

73% 

victims with 

No Helpful Social Supports 

Social supports may not be suficient. The existence of perceived helpfbl social supports is 

associated with several positive circumstances, as noted above. However, the availability of 

helpfbl social supports is clearly not sufficient for victims of domestic violence to end the abuse. 

Subjects’ responses to questions about the expected severity of fiture abuse and their level of 

fear clearly show that having helpful social supports does not mitigate victims’ expectations of 

fbture abuse. I 

. For example, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to 

how seriously they expected to be injured in future assaults. More of the victims without helpfbl 

social supports (47%) expected that the injury would be Very Serious, but there were still many 

victims with helpfbl social supports (35%) who also expected to be seriously injured in the hture 

(see Exhibit 1 1). In a similar pattern, nearly half (47%) of the victims without helphl social 

supports were Very Afraid of their assailant. Yet over a quarter (27%) of the victims who had 

helpfbl social supports also reported that they were Very Afraid of the assailant (see Exhibit 12). 

37 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Thus, despite whatever 

for aiding all victims in 

- assistance 

effectively 

some instances. Perhaps the degree of helphlness was refore one of perception than 

reality. 

Exhibit 11: 

Victims' Expectations of the Seriousness of Future Abuse: 

Comparison of Victims With and Without Helpful Social Supports 

100% 

80% 

20% 

0% 

ESlightly Serio& 

ESomewhat Serious 

EFaidy Serious 

AM 

35% 

25% 

Victims with Victims with 

Helpful Supports No Helpful Supports 

38 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
? 

Victims' Fear of the Offender: 

Comparison of Victims With and Without Helpful Social Supports J 

7 

4 

a 

5 

c 

u 

0 

c 

40% 2 

' 20% 

0% 

rslightly Afraid 

MSomewhat Afraid 

HFairly Afraid 

Victims with Victims with 

Helpful Supports No Helpful Supports 

Discussion 

The purpose of the present study was to begin an exploration of the relationship between 

social supports in the lives of victims of domestic violence who suffered a broad range of violent 

incidents at the time they came to the attention of the police. The most basic questions posed by 

this study were whether these victims had social supports and, if so, whether they perceived 

these social supports as being helpfil. Another findamental question explored similarities and 

differences between victims with and without social supports. 

Perceived helpfbl social supports may be far more common among victims of domestic 

violence than generally appreciated. Some previous studies found few social supports available 

to victims of domestic violence. Typically, these studies interviewed victims who had made use 

of domestic violence shelters after experiencing severe levels of violence. Subjects in the YD 

present study represent a much broader range of incidents with a greater range of levels of -a 

39 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
violence. Not only did most of the victims seen by the police have social supports available to 

them, but in many cases, they perceived those supports to be very helphl. 

The presence of helpfbl social supports was associated with several positive factors. 

Victims who possessed helpfbl social supports were more likely than those without to have 

called t.he police themselves than to have had someone else call the police. Overall, victims with 

helpfbl social supports appeared to be at less risk for fbture violence from their assailant. They 

believed that hture violence was less likely than did victims without helpful social supports, and 

they were less likely to expect future injuries to be severe. 

Unfortunately, the existence of helpfbl social supports is not enough to resolve victims’ 

problems with domestic violence. Even with the assistance of helpful social supports, some 

victims remained very afraid of their assailant and expected to be seriously harmed in the future. 

More of the victims without helphl social supports expected that the injury would be Very 

Serious, but there were still many victims with helpful social supports who also expected to be 

seriously injured in the fbture. Over a quarter of the victims who had helpful social supports 

reported that they were Very Afraid of the assailant. 

These findings fbrther document the well-known fact that domestic violence can be an 

extraordinarily difficult situation fiom which to escape. Resources, such as helpful social 

supports, that might be very useful in many other situations can prove inadequate when it comes 

to escaping a committed assailant. 

. 

The mechanisms responsible for the associations seen with social supports are beyond the 

scope of this paper. For example, the availability and effectiveness of social supports may 

depend heavily on whether the victim developed those contacts on her own or through her abuser 

(Herman, 1994). 

40 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Finally, the causal role of social supports is not yet documented. For 

supports may aid victims in dealing with their assailants, or victims who can effectively deal 

with their assailants may be more likely to develop social supports that they believe to be 

helpful. 

Future research is needed in how the existence of perceived social supports impacts a 

victim’s risk and resiliency. The research undertaken here suggests that the existence of social 

supports increases a victim’s perception of her resiliency, but does not necessarily decrease her 

perception of her risk. That is, victims with helpful social supports were significantly more 

likely than those without to have called the police themselves, as opposed to someone else 

calling on their behalf Though it is speculative, this may suggest a greater sense of resiliency, a 

greater sense of willingness to call for assistance, to have the authorities intervene, and to act on 

their own behalf. Further, victims with perceived helpfbl social supports may hold a more 

positive outlook, anticipating less violence than those victims without helpful social supports. 

OTHER RESEARCH PROJECTS 

The Partnership developed several research projects and sought funding for their 

implementation. Each of the projects is described below. 

OFFICER EXCHANGE PROGRAM 

The Partnership designed an evaluation of an officer exchange program that was being 

planned by the Framingham and Chelsea Police Departments. The exchange program was 

similar to common private industry training. The premise was that exposing officers to other 

rogressive departments could instill creativity 

services. The program objectives were as follows. 

41 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Framingham officers are untrained in policing the urban environment that is quickly 

developing in South Framingham. The exchange program will expose them to an urban 

and diverse environment reflective of South Framingham's future. Officers will have 

unique opportunities to identi@ the types of problems associated with an urban 

environment and will develop insight into strategies to combat those problems. 

Presently, Framingham Police have no minority or female mid and upper level command 

officers. The Department has actively and successfilly recruited minority and female 

officers and expects promotions to occur in the future. Chelsea has numerous minority 

and female mid and upper level command st^. Framingham officers involved in the 

exchange program will have the opportunity to work with minority and female command, 

which will instill confidence and respect for what will soon become a new aspect of 

police management in Framingham. 

c; Both Chelsea and Framingham have well-developed community policing initiatives, - 

including use of decentralized sub stations. Officers will experience similar philosophies 

and programs being delivered in different environments. 

Chelsea officers will be exposed to a more formal administrative structure based on a 

strong, progressive, and successfil infrastructure. 

;s 

Chelsea officers will have the opportunity to assist Framingham officers identi@ 

solutions to problems that have already been addressed in Chelsea but are just starting in Framingham. 0 ;: $: 

,- 

The officer exchange program was planned to involve six Framingham and six Chelsea 

police officers working on six-week rotations. Authority to act as officers in the exchange 

community would come fiom a mutual aid agreement. 

The primary goal of the proposed research was to conduct a rigorous evaluation of the 

exchange program. Secondary goals would be pursued as the evaluation results became 

available. These secondary goals were to (1) develop a theoretical understanding of the 

program's effects, and (2) devise and test mechanisms for taking full advantage of the officers' 

experiences. 

A subject pool of Framingham police officers was to be created by inviting officers to sign 

up for the program. On the basis of the level of interest expressed in the pilot program, a large 

number of officers was expected to apply. If too few applied, incentives would be added in order 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-_ 

officers would then be rando 

program, while another six wo 01 condition 

officers would participate in a.later offering of the exchange program. 

Officers in both conditions would be pretested before assignments are made. Officers 

would be tested at the conclusion of the program and then every two months for at least six 

months. 

The pretest questionnaire was designed to gather information about: 

Demographics, such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, rank, and number of years as an 

officer. 

Level of satisfaction with the job as police officer in general and specific aspects of the 

job, such as relationships with fellow officers and superiors, opportunities to advance 

within the department, and perception of the police by citizens in the community. 

The importance of specific tasks (e.g., vehicle and foot patrolling, communicating with 

citizens to create a relationship, finding alternative activities for juveniles, writing 

citations for minor street and motor vehicle violations, etc.) in relation to being a good 

police officer. 

Self-evaluation of performance of the above tasks. 

Expectations concerning the exchange program. 

This draft was to be pilot tested and then revised. In addition, the first group of officers who 

participate as part of the piloting phase of the exchange program would be interviewed 

extensively concerning their experiences and suggestions. This information would help us 

modi@ the test instruments. 

The officer exchange program was postponed due to the departure of the Chelsea Chief of 

Police. 

43 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. 

IMPROVED UTILIZATION OF CRIME DATA 

The Framingham Police Department wants to begin using crime data to guide the 

deployment of officers. The present system of deploying patrol officers supplanted an outmoded 

procedure that restricted officers to small areas of the town. Even the present system, which - 

assigns of€icer teams into larger areas of the city, does not take into account patterns of criminal 

activity. Data necessary for studying crime patterns in the town exists in the Department's 

computer files but has not been used to describe trends and patterns of crimes. 

Steps taken to improve the utilization of data include the following. 

0 Initial attempts to learn from the experiences of others turned up little information fiom a 

search of the criminal justice literature. The next step will be to contact other 

departments that are already analyzing their crime data in order to learn what techniques 

have worked and which have been unsuccessful. 

0 Accessing the data should have been the simplest and most straightforward portion of the 

enterprise. However, that was not the case. Problems stemmed from the use of 

proprietary software, a complex database, the absence of in-house computer experts, and 

a vendor with an uneven record of support. 

0 Data problems often do not become apparent until attempts are made to use the data. 

Thus, the Partnership has begun outlining reports needed by the Department in order to 

force an examination of the availability of the necessary data. Preliminary reports will be 

produced in order to check for the extent of missing and erroneous data. At the same 

time, the bugs associated with downloading the data are being worked out. 

0 The Partnership has begun identifjling the Department's specific needs for data. Once the &: 

needs are clear, report; will be designed to meet them. Equally important, the format in 

which the information is presented is being developed so that crime patterns can be 

readily viewed and easily interpreted. For example, plotting the type and frequency of 

crimes and police calls would likely be a useful tool for deploying officers. 

Initial analysis of the Department's crime data will involve a focus on simple associations, 

attempting to identify locations and time periods where criminal activity is concentrated. Later, 

the Partnership will begin exploring the use of more sophisticated statistical procedures for 

identifying patterns and trends in criminal activities. For example, time series analysis will be a 

44 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
used to search for trends over time. Multiple regression analysis will be used to search for 

predictor variables that can account for rates of different types of crimes. Finally, we will 

employ mathematical modeling techniques used in other areas in order to simulate patterns of 

criminal activity in Framingham. 

THE BROKEN WINDOWS THEORY APPLIED TO HIGHWAY SAFETY 

The Partnership is currently negotiating with the National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administratiofl. S. Department of Transportation to test one of their long-standing, 

fbndamental assumptions. NHTSA has assumed that vigorous enforcement of traffic violations 

will result in an overall reduction of all types of crime - not just traffic offenses. 

"TSA is interested in Framingham as a test site because of the Partnership's willingness 

and ability to provide a rigorous experimental investigation of the assumption. The preliminary 

plan is to identifjl pairs of small areas within Framingham such that the two areas in each pair are 

very similar. One member of each pair will be randomly selected as the intervention site, while 

the other constitutes a control site. The intervention will consist of highly visible and vigorous 

enforcement of all traffic violations. The control sites will receive a comparable level of 

additional police presence without including unusual enforcement of traffic violations. The main 

dependent variable will be crime rates. Mediating variables will include arrests of drivers or 

passengers for other crimes (e.g., outstanding warrants) during traffic stops for enforcement of 

. 

traffic laws, and whether the drivedpassenger lives or works in Framingham. 

REDUCING THE IMPACT OF NON-EMERGENCY 911 CALLS 

Reducing the impact of non-emergency 91 1 calls is one of the Framingham Police 

Department's top priorities. Consequently, the Partnership is pursuing two approaches to dealing 

with the problem. The first approach is a variation of what other cities are implementing as an 

45 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
*. 

attempt to encourage the public to 

approach differs fiom those on which NIJ is currently 

to use an existing police business line for non-emergencies, rat 

a new non-emergency seven-digit number. 

ergencies. Framhgham's 

will educate the public 

than creating a 3 1 1 system or 

There are two main advantages in using the existing police business number for 

non-emergency calls. First, there is no need for the expense of setting up a new phone system or 

at least new phone lines. Second, the police business telephone number is already listed in all 

.. . ... 6; 

t:. 

15. 

t.: phone books and in many other locations, such as stickers with important phone numbers that are 

distributed to clients or to the general public by many organizations. 

The second approach that the Partnership will pursue recognizes that many non-emergency 

calls will continue to be made to 91 1, even if an education program aimed at diverting these calls 

to a different number is relatively successhl. Therefore, the Partnership also seeks to improve 

the ways in which 91 1 dispatchers deal with non-emergency calls. 

f 

__ 

Oddly, there seems to be virtually no research on the process of responding to calls made to 

91 1. While a few efforts are underway to better automate the process of taking 91 1 calls 

(Peterson, 1996; Poultney, 1999, investigators have not examined the decision-making process 

of 91 1 operators. The most positive development in this area is that Franklin and Hunt (1993) I. % 

have created a situation that simulates public safety dispatching. The purpose is to duplicate the 

stressful circumstances faced by emergency dispatchers so that their decision making can be 

studied in the laboratory. 

As mentioned above, the Partnership will study two strategies for reducing non-emergency 

calls to 91 1. Process and outcome evaluations will be conducted on each strategy so that we will 

know what works and so that other departments can learn fiom our experiences. 

a 

' 46 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
The Partnership believes there are three conditio ust be met in order to shift many 

p non-emergency calls from 91 1 to the regular police business line. : 

-3 

0 Citizens need ready access to the non-emergency phone number. The ease of retrieving a 

seven-digit number can never be as easy as remembering 9 1 1, but various aides can be 

provided to simplify obtaining the number for most people. 

0 Citizens must understand the difference between life-threatening emergencies that are 

appropriate for 91 1 and non-emergency situations that are appropriate for the standard 

phone number. 

0 Citizens must be taught the negative consequences of making non-emergency calls to 91 1 

and shown the advantages of using the business phone number except in emergencies. 

In order to educate the public, the Partnership will design and implement a community-wide 

information campaign that combines the distribution of items containing the police 

non-emergency number with educational materials. Items containing the non-emergency 

number will include stickers that can be applied to phones and phone book covers, bookmarks, 

refrigerator door magnets, and table tents for setting on counters where phones are located. 

These items will include a section of emergency numbers, a section of numbers for other types of 

services, such as police, highway department, and other town services, and a section for 

fiequently called numbers, such as those of friends. These promotional items will be distributed 

'. :r at local fairs, provided to organizations and businesses willing to distribute them to their clients 

andor employees, and placed in public locations such as Town Hall and the library. The 

Partnership will also disseminate information through local print and electronic media. We 

2 

'1 

bI 

. 

propose using no-cost media outlets such as: PSAs; information posted on cable television 

bulletin boards; and, news stories about the project in newspapers, newsletters by local 

si 

*CY organizations, and on radio and television. In addition, the Partnership will rent two prominent 

billboards for one month to display a message about the proper use of 91 1. 

-- 0 

47 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Individuals calling 91 1 with a non-emergency will be politely switched to an educational 

recording followed by a menu of choices. The recording will explain the purpose of 9 1 1 and 

consequences of inappropriate non-emergency calls. It will then provide the Department's phone 

number for regular police business and explain that the caller can reach a live operator by calling 

the number, instead of recorded menu options that will follow. Thus, individuals who call the 

regular business line will be positively reinforced by contacting a human being and receiving a 

quick response to their query. Individuals who call 91 1 inappropriately will be negatively 

reinforced by having to wait through the educational message and then listen to an automated 

voice messaging system. A third, existing phone number will be dedicated to an automated 

voice messaging system for callers who prefer that system to a live operator. 

The 91 1 number will always be presented in informational materials with instructions 

emphasizing its role as an emergency number. At the same time, the regular business police 

number will be displayed prominently and will be accompanied by a message indicating that it is 

for all non-emergency police matters. 

In order for these materials to be effective, they must be distributed to nearly every 

Framingham household and must be displayed prominently at every pay phone. To accomplish 

this, the Partnership will enlist the aid of "EX, the local telephone company. By including 

these materials in telephone bills, the Partnership can easily reach nearly every home and 

business serviced by the Framingham Police Department. Educational materials will be printed 

in several languages and distributed in the respective enclaves were foreign-speaking residents 

tend to live. 

If analysis of calls preceding the intervention indicates that some individuals repeatedly call 

9 1 1 for non-emergencies, we will employ another strategy for such "repeaters." Repeaters (who 

.. -_ 

.. 

.. 

x: 

48 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
s1: a will be operationally defined once the call data have been analyzed) will be mail 

personal letter from the Department. The letter will remind them that 91 1 is for emergency us 

and that other calls should be placed to the non-emergency number. When appropriat 

may include information about other organizationdagencies to contact for specific problems. If,. 

for example, citizens call the police repeatedly about problems with their trash collection, the 

letter may include information about who to contact in the Department of Public Works to obtain 

help. 

The number of non-emergency calls placed to both the 91 1 and regular business number 

will be monitored on a weekly basis beginning three months before the 91 1 educational 

campaign begins and will continue through the end of the project. The educational campaign 

should result in an increase in the percentage of non-emergency calls that are placed to the 

regular business line. However, the effects of educational campaign may wear off over time. By 

plotting the weekly trends in non-emergency calls, the Partnership will be able to: 

0 Verifjr the effectiveness of the educational campaign and determine the magnitude of the 

effect. 

Assess the effectiveness of different components of the campaign by staggering their 

implementation. 

0 I Identifjr and track changes in the types of non-emergency calls to 91 1. This information 

'may help develop more effective and well-targeted publicity to discourage specific types 

of inappropriate calls. 

Measure any increase in non-emergency calls placed to 91 1 as the effects of the 

educational campaign wear OK This will enable the Partnership to determine how often 

the educational campaign must be repeated. 

91 1 dispatchers will continue to receive non-eme calls despite efforts to educate the 

public and to provide well-publicized alternative phone numbers. Therefore, the Partnership 

49 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
t present, dispatchers rely on their e 

is a true emergency and whether an office 

This situation results in the following: 

ce and intuition in deciding whether a 91 1 call 

be sent immediately in response to the call. 

Decisions about what is and what is not an emergency varies from dispatcher to 

dispatcher. 

Scarce resources are spent in responding to calls which are not emergencies. 6Y.a f.* 

There is a risk that dispatchers will mistakenly dismiss a call that turns out to be a true 

emergency. 

The Partnership intends to develop decision-making guidelines that will enable dispatchers 

to (1) quickly transfer non-emergency 91 1 calls to an appropriate, alternative telephone line, and 

(2) rate the degree of urgency and determine the appropriate type of response. The response in 

some cases could be a phone call from the police or a visit at some later time, instead of an 

immediate in-person response. 

To achieve these aims, the Partnership has conducted a literature search of police 

dispatching and begun outlining possible strategies. The next step is to study other situations in 

which individuals must make decisions. about emergencies. For example, literature has been , 

. obtained on medical triage (Baxt, 1990) and the decision-making process by which mental health 

professionals decide whether to hospitalize individuals seen in emergency rooms (Apsler and 

Bassuk, 1983; McNiel et al. 1992; Turner and Turner, 1991; Thienhaus, 1992; Way, Evans, and 

Banks, 1992; Coontz, Lidz, and Mulvey, 1994; Rabinowitz, Mark, and Slyuzberg, 1994; 

Rabinowitz, Massad, and Fennig, 1995). 

50 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
2 

The most important decision atcher must make is whether or not a call represents an 

emergency. Initial guidelines will consist of a checklist. If one or more of the criteria on the 

checklist are met, the call is an emergency and warrants and immediate response fiom police 

. and/or other emergency services. Criteria will deal with the following issues: 

3 2 

0 The need for medical or mental health services. 

w 

0 The potential for future violence, property damage, or other serious problems. 

The opportunity for apprehending perpetrators. 

! "<Difficult situations will occur when the dispatcher determines that a call is not an .. 

emergency, but the caller demands immediate action. This becomes a public relations issue, and 

the Partnership plans to study options for responding in these situations. 

ORGANIZATIONAL STRESS IN POLICE DEPARTMENTS 

7 

4 

$0 The overall goal of this research project is: 

I - 

0 To learn about the relationship between organizational factors and police stress. 

Specific objectives include learning: 4 

t 

& 

P 

<J 

0 What are the primary sources of organizational stress? 

What is the relative importance of organizational and operational factors as they relate to 

stress for the police? t 

0 How does organizational stress in police departments differ from that in other 

organizations? 

0 How do officers differ in their reactions to organizational stress? 

0 What is the relationship between subjective stress and overt symptoms? 

0 What types of interventions can most effectively deal with organizational stress? 

There is little agreement among investigators studying stress regarding (1) which concepts 

are important, (2) how the concepts should be defined, or (3) what the relationships are among 

51 

-1 , 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
how sources of stress impact different individuals. 

The project will employ a preliminary three-part model 

model consists of stressfil incidents or situations, that produce in officers a subjective 

experience of stress, which, in turn, can sometimes cause objective effects of stress. Brown and 

Campbell (1990) use a similar three-part conceptual model. They distinguish among stressors 

G -- (Le., potential external sources of adverse reactions); felt stress (i.e., self-perceived negative p 

II, 

impact); and distress (i.e., self-reported symptoms of anxiety, depression, social dysfbnction, and 

somatic disturbance). 

Violent incidents are usually the first examples that come to mind when people think of 

police stress. Our focus on organizational stress adds circumstances that are part of the police 

department organization, such as limited opportunities for advancement, a poor fit between work 

and the individual’s education and/or experience, shiftwork, restrictions on officer 

decision-making, unreasonable expectations by superiors, and s 

circumstances or incidents may be stressfbl for most officers, while others might only affect a 

, few or affect different officers in different ways. . Many of these sources of stress can be defined in concrete terms that allow for clear-cut 

measurement. Stressfbl job duties could be defined as those incidents in which officers are 

physically attacked or simp 

organization could be defined 

in rank by the time they had 

52 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
-. 

Not all potential sources of stress are easy to define. Poor communication betweenpatrol 

oficers and superiors, for example, might require comparing patrol officers' and their superior's 

explanations of an instruction given by the superior. The interviews that we will conduct with 

officers will help us find clear ways of defining sources of stress so they can be measured. 

Shiftwork can cause the same types of health problems in police officers that are also 

assumed to result from other types of stress (Nachreiner et al. 1995). Yet shiftwork is typically 

treated as a topic separate from police stress. An important conceptual issue for this project will 

be to determine whether shiftwork should be classified as a form of stress or as some other type 

of influence that can cause similar problems. Research by Spelten, Barton, and Folkard (1 993) 

suggests that many police might reject the notion that shiftwork is a legitimate source of stress. 

They found a tendency for police to mistakenly underestimate the negative effects of shiftwork, 

apparently because officers are so used to shiftwork that they become unaware of the resulting 

problems. 

The subjective experience of stress will be the most problematic component of the 

conceptual model in terms of both definition and measurement. One difficulty is the 

proliferation of closely related concepts. These include: felt stress, strain, depression, anxiety, 

low job satisfaction, and others., Another difficulty is that most of these terms are poorly . defined. All of these concepts involve a negative emotional state assumed to be caused by one's 

work. They may well have different meanings for different people, and there are no instruments 

available that can distinguish among them. In order to move forward, the project will select the 

definition of subjective stress with the strongest empirical support in terms of its reliability and 

validity. 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Concern about police stress usually 

e. 

results from the high incidence of alcoholism, domestic 

violence, divorce, and suicide among officers. These effects are objective in the sense that they 

are readily observable and measurable by others and do not depend on the individual officer to 

report internal feelings. The project will also examine other possible objective effects of stress. 

These include high blood pressure, absenteeism, permanent work disability, hostile outbursts, 

involvement in car crashes, inappropriate use of force, changes in personal behavior, such as 

eating habits, exercising, and so on. Many of these variables can be measured accurately with 

little difficulty. The tough question with which the project will deal is which ones are indeed 

effects of stress and, if so, under what circumstances and for whom? 

Stresshl situations affect different people in different ways (Broadbent, 1985; 

Frankenhaeuser, 1986; Hockey, 1986; Tattersall and Farmer, 1995). The project will study many 

other variables that moderate, or influence, the effect of stressful circumstances on individuals. 

Previous research has identified the following examples of moderator variables that influence 

police stress: rank (Brown and Campbell, 1990; Brown and Fielding, 1993), length of time on 

the force, race/ethnicity (Morris, 1996), gender (Brown and Fielding, 1993; Beermann and 

Nachreiner, 1995; Morris, 1996), marital status, and presence of children at home. Other 

investigators have also examined personality variables but have not yet produced solid evidence 

supporting particular dimensions (Hart, Wearing, and Headey, 1995; Wearing and Hart, 1996) 

? 

In the past, there appeared to be no need for anything as elaborate as a conceptual model 

for explaining police stress. It was simply common sense that police experienced 

life-threatening situations that necessarily resulted in stress which, in turn, negatively affected 

them and their families. It now appears that police stress is much more complicated. For 

example, as discussed earlier, it increasingly seems that organizational sources are bigger 

54 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
c- I > .: . 

'_ i 

-. 

contributors to stress than job duties. Thus, a conceptual m ecessary to account for 

; 3 '? 

p: 

factors such as the following. First, what exactly is it about the organization that causes stress. 

.. .. 

8 

Second, why are the effects of stress more severe among police oflticers than in other 

occupations? Is the stress greater, and if so, what is different about police organizations? 

Another possibility is that stress is no greater in police organizations than in others, but some 

characteristic of the police culture renders officers less able to cope with stress. 

One source of conceptual models for our work is the body of research on organizational 

.gp 51 

health and stress (most of which does not deal with police organizations). Even here, the shift in 

emphasis from focusing on the individual employee to a search for characteristics of the 

organization that affect employees is quite recent, and relatively little solid research exists (Jaffe, 

1995). Some of the investigators in this area are well aware of the definitional problems. As 

Jones, Flynn, and Kelloway (1995) and Motowidlo, Packard, and Manning (1 986) observe, even 

the notion of stress is difficult to specify. One definition proposed by Houtman and Kompier 

(1995) is that stress is the state of individuals when they cannot or feel unable to cope with the 

psychological load imposed on them. Radmacher and Sheridan (1 995) recognized that a wide 

range of operational definitions ofjob strain exist in the literature. Furthermore, they found that 

the concept of control, as used in some.models of organizational stress, is actually composed of 

several independent dimensions. This finding is consistent with Ganster's (1 989) argument that 

control is intertwined with job complexity and job challenge. 

Several explanations have been presented by investigators attempting to understand the 

mechanisms through which organizations cause stress. For example, Jones, fly^, and Kelloway 

(1 995) believe that organizational support plays a major role in organizational behavior and 

influences both the organization's productivity and employees' health. Others have taken a 

-. 

-a 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
similar approach by examining employees' perceptions of the organization's commitment to 

them. Van der Velde and Class (1995) contend that it is often the organizational culture that 

creates stress by fostering expectations for behavior that conflict with employees' preferences. 

Organizational cultures can be inherently oriented toward conflict or can induce stress by being 

proscriptive and ambiguous. 

The conceptual model that has recently received the most attention involves conflict 

between the demands made on employees and their capacity to satisfy those demands 

(Radmacher and Sheridan, 1995). Wall (1 996) hrther refined this general notion by 

distinguishing between decision latitude and control in an effort to account for work strain 

observed in manufacturing employees. Marshall (1 997) also refined the original theory and 

distinguished between two models. A job demand-control model fiom which it is hypothesized 

that jobs that are both high in job demands and low in decision latitude are associated with 

greater psychological distress. His other model, a job demand-service model, results in the 

hypothesis that jobs high in job demands and low in service to others are associated with greater 

psychological stress. Tests of these models showed that the job demand-control model was a 

significant predictor of psychological distress among employees in the manufacturing industry, 

whereas the job demand-service model .was a significant predictor of psychological distress 

among employees in the services industries. 

When possible, the project will make use of existing measurement instruments. The 

instruments that appear to be supported by positive assessments of their reliability and validity 

include: 

Human Factors Inventory (St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Companies, 1985). 

Daily Interaction Record in Organizations (Buunk and Verhoeven, 1991). 

;*. 

56 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Police Daily Hassles and Uplifts Scales (Hart, Wearing, and Headey, 1994). 

0 State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Brown and Campbell, 1990). 

0 Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. 

0 Organizational Culture Inventory (Cooke and Lafferty, 1986). 

0 Quick-Scan Stress Scale (Radmacher and Sheridan, 1995). 

New measures will be developed only as a last resort when an instrument is urgently 

needed but either none exists or those that do exist have not been assessed. Final selection of 

instruments will not occur until the state-of-the-art report is prepared, since it will include a 

carefbl review of available instruments. 

Most research on police stress is heavily dependent on self-reports simply because there are 

no practical alternatives. Typically, self-reports are used both to assess the incidence of stresshl 

events and also officers' subjective reactions to those events. While this project will make use of 

self-reports, several steps will be taken to maximize their accuracy. The reliability of some 

self-reports will be assessed by repeating items from a baseline questionnaire on the two 

follow-up questionnaires. The answers to some items should be the same on all three tests, 

thereby providing the opportunity to test whether officers do in fact give the same answer each 

time. I 

The validity of some self-reports will be assessed by comparing responses with department 

records. Oficers' reports dealing with certain types of events can be verified from department 

incident reports. Conversely, we will determine whether events appearing in incident reports are 

also mentioned in officers' responses to our questionnaires. 

57 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
The most important assessment of self-reports will be the extent to which findings based on 

self-reports are consistent with other findings based only on objective measures. Where 

possible, models and hypotheses will be tested with measures that do not depend on self-reports. 

The bulk of the project will be devoted to testing conceptual models and hypotheses of 

police stress. Longitudinal research in which observations are made at different times is 

necessary to adequately test models and hypotheses which postulate specific sources as the 

causes of felt stress (Zap6 1996; Schonfeld, Rhee, and Xia, 1995; Chen, Spector, and Jex, 1995). 

Cross-sectional studies consisting of observations made at a single point in time are usehl for 

identifying associations among variables but are limited in their ability to test causal 

relationships among variables. 

Therefore, two methodologies will be employed in this project for testing hypotheses. The 

first is a 12-month longitudinal study in which measures of potential sources of stress and the 

subjective and objective effects are first made early in the project and then again two more times 

at six-month intervals. The strength of some sources of stress will vary during the year, new 

sources of stress will emerge, and some old sources will disappear. Longitudinal data will allow 

. : 

e 

*- Z' i 

y 

:a,-. 

us to show how changes in these sources of stress are causally related to the stress that police 

officers feel and to the resulting symptoms. I 

The second methodology involves the application of time series analysis to observations 

made over many, regular intervals. Daily observations will be made for one, small group of 

officers, and weekly observations will be made for another small group. Time series analyses 

will examine trends in the experience of stress and enable us to relate these trends to the ebb and 

flow of sources of stress. 

58 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
I. 

*. 

Another important aspect of our meth I approach involves comparisons among 

three very different police departments. The 

departments will be a major asset in reaching 

throughout the country. 

nity to compare results among the three 

ons that are generalizable to police 

In order to make certain that this project proceeds on'the basis of the most current 

information available, two steps will be taken immediately after startup. First, databases will be 

searched electronically to ensure that we know about information that appeared after the searches 

conducted for the proposal. In addition, we will contact the most active investigators in the area 

of police stress to learn about new developments that have not yet been published. 

Insights from police officers are essential in order for this project to be successhl. 

Therefore, we will conduct a series of interviews designed to systematically explore police stress 

from the officer's point of view. A stratified random sample representing the Framingham police 

department will be drawn. Two lieutenants, three sergeants, and 20 patrol officers will be 

interviewed, one at a time. A protocol will be used to guide a relatively open-ended discussion. 

Topics for the discussion include: 

Examination of different types of negative feelings dealing with stress, anger, depression, 

and fixstration. How does the officer define these and other feelings? 

0 What are the sources of stress, frustration, and so on, and what are some personal 

examples? 

0 What, if anything, has worked to relieve stress, and what more could be done? 

A qualitative analysis will be conducted on the officers' comments. Qualitative data will be 

processed by identifLing key themes (two or more staff will review the interview notes, identie 

themes, and extract data to provide inter-rater reliability), coding by theme, tabulating, and 

excerpting to illustrate key themes. Results of the analysis will be presented in an interim report. 

59 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
The main study for this p 

their subjective and objective effects on officers at three points in time spaced six months apa 

Initial data collection for the longitudinal study will no later than the fourth month of th 

project. This first point of data collection Will serve as the baseline against which later data will 

be compared and will also serve as a platform for exploring associations among many variables. 

Longitudinal data is necessary for rigorously testing many of the models and hypotheses 

that will have been identified by the state-of-the-art review and by analysis of the baseline 

survey. Therefore, data collection will be repeated six and then twelve months after the baseline 

data is gathered. 

All police officers, except the Chiefs, in three very different police departments in 

Massachusetts will be asked to participate in the study. Given the strong support for the study 

from the Chiefs and command staff, we expect that nearly all officers will agree to take part. 

There are several reasons for including three police departments in the study. The most 

important reason is that each department provides the opportunity to replicate the findings from 

the other departments. In order to draw conclusions about police stress that can be generalized to 

most police, it is necessary to show that the results from this study are not unique to a particular 

police department. For example, results from this research would be challenged immediately if 

they showed that organizational factors are bigger sources of stress than job duties, but data was 

obtained entirely from a community where little violence occurs. 

While we expect to identifjl sources of stress common to most police departments, there 

will also be differences among departments with respect to both the sources and effects of stress. 

Thus, a second reason for including three departments in the study is that they will help us begin 

studying stress-related factors that vary among departments. 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
!w* A 

. -. 

.. 

i; 

Finally, additional departments increase the number of police offi s participating in th 

study. In research, such as the proposed project, that is designed to sort out the effects 

variables, most statistical procedures require that there be many more subjects than vari 

Similarly, it will be possible to develop measurement instruments on one group of officers and 

still have other groups available for assessing the reliability and validity of the instruments. 

The three Massachusetts police departments taking part in the research are located in 

Framingham, Chelsea, and Harvard. Chelsea is a densely populated, urban, working class city 

with numerous language challenges, active gangs, and other problems typical of major cities. 

The Chelsea Police Department, although presently very progressive and professional, suffered 

from a past involving corruption, misuse of authority, and lack of leadership. Harvard, at the 

other extreme, is a predominantly white, well-to-do community with little criminal activity. The 

Harvard Police Department, under a new Chief, is regarded as quite progressive and 

professional. Framingham falls neatly between the two extremes with respect to both 

demographics and the amount of criminal activity and violence encountered by the police. 

Framingham is also important for the study because its citizens provide a remarkably effective 

representation of the entire United States. That is one of the main reasons Framingham was 

chosen for the influential Framingham heart study and why businesses frequently test market 

their products in the town. The Framingham Police Department enjoys a reputation of 

exceptional service, professional personnel, and high integrity. 

The study will be presented to officers in each police department during roll call by a team 

consisting of one lieutenant, one sergeant, one patrol officer, and two Social Science Research 

and Evaluation, Inc. researchers. Although participation is voluntary, the use of the cross-section c_ 

61 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
0 of police stafF will promote a sense of fairness and demonstrate that all ranks have equal status in 

the project. 

Most of the data concerning potential sources of stress and the objective effects of stress 

will be collected by the research staff working closely with the appropriate officers in each 

department. Questionnaires will be administered to all officers to obtain their estimates of the 

sources of stress and their reports of the subjective effects of stress. Administration of 

questionnaires will take place in small groups. The groups will be supervised so as to prevent 

gs .- interaction among the officers during testing and to enable officers to keep their responses ," 

private. 

One of the biggest unknowns involving police stress is how it changes over time. At one 

I. E "- 

T-2 ? extreme, some stress could be fairly constant. At the other extreme, some stress could vary 

greatly in its intensity. Its strength could vary throughout a shift, fiom day-to-day, from 

week-to-week, and so on. One of the best ways to study this issue is to take frequent 

*- 

e ? t;-;; 

:T 

observations of police so that the observations capture whatever variation occurs. 

Since we do not yet know the optimal interval for making observations of police stress, we 

will experiment with two mini-studies. For one randomly selected sample of five Framingham 

police officers, data will be collected daily to track potential sources of stress and their effects. . 

I .. .. ' 

Data will be collected weekly for another randomly selected five Framingham officers. 

Analysis of the first point of data collection will be largely exploratory. That is, it will 

search for relationships among variables that warrant hrther testing. Later, much more powefil 

analyses will be conducted on the longitudinal data provided by the follow-up data collections. 

The first step in the analysis will be to examine the distributions of all variables using 

m Tukey's (1 977) exploratory data analysis techniques. Next, bivariate associations among many 

62 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
.- . , 

will be tested. B any association 

bound to be significant just by chan 

treated as tentative. Finally, multivariate analyses will be used to 

the hypotheses developed while writing the state-of-the-art report on police stress. For example, 

hierarchical multiple regression analysis will be used to compare the contributions of different 

groupings of predictor variables (demographics, exposure to risks, and organizational climate) to 

$i 

g 

a dependent measure of subjectively felt stress. 

Multivariate analyses will be conducted to test two types of relationships among (1) 

sources of stress, (2) subjectively felt stress, and (3) objective effects of stress. The first 

relationship to be tested is the temporal order of the variables. Longitudinal data will enable us 

to test whether specific incidents or situations do in fact cause the police to feel stress which, in 

turn, then leads to objective symptoms. The second relationship involves comparing the 

magnitude of potential stressors with the magnitude of the subjective and objective 

consequences. 

. 

li 

--. :* 

I 

f a 

@ -3 

-3 

3 

Initially, each of the ten officers in the two mini-studies involving daily or weekly data 

collection will be treated as a separate case study. Data will be plotted for each officer in order 

to study the individual's reaction to potentially stressful circumstances. If the results appear 

promising, data collection will continue throughout the project so that time series analyses can be 

conducted. Time series analysis will enable us to identifjl trends in the data, such as changes in 

subjective stress that increase during periods of intense police activity, such as on weekends, or 

- 

-I 

when a particular commanding officer is supervising. In addition, interrupted time series 

.- 

analysis can isolate the impact of new, relatively sudden stressful events, such as a change in 

assignment fiom one partner to another. -a 

63 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
< *u 

r,. 

e in the project will be the dev 

caused by organizational factors. First Its of the research will be used to identifjl the 

organizational factors that contrjbu e most to police stress. Then, resear 

officers will work together to devise strategies to modi@ the targeted organi 

Special attention will be devoted to insuring that the proposed strategies are politically, . 

economically, and logistically feasible. 

64 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
REFERENCES 

Apsler, R. and Bassuk, E. 1983. “Differences between clinicians in the decision to admit.” 

Archives of General Psychiatry: 40: 1133-1 137. 

Bachman, R., and Coker, A.L. 1995. “Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive 

effects of victim injury, offender’s history of violence, and race.” Violence and Victims. 

1 0: 9 1 - 1 06. 

Barnett, O., Martinez, T., and Keyson, M. 1996. “The relationship between violence, social 

support, and self-blame in battered women.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 

11(2):221-233. 

Baxt, W. 1990. “Use of artificial neural network for data analysis in clinical decision-making: 

The diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion.” Neural Computation. 2(4):480-489. 

Beermann, B. and Nachreiner, F. 1995. “Working shifts and difference effects for women and 

men?” Work and Stress, 9(2-3):289-297. 

Berk, R., Berk, S., Newton, P., and Loseke, D. 1984. “Cops on call: Summoning police to the 

scene of spousal violence. Law and Society Review. 8(3):479-498. 

Black, D. 1980. “The manners and customs of the police.” New York: Academic Press. 

Bowker, L.H. 1983. “Beating wife beating.” Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. 

Broadbent, D. 1985. “The clinical impact ofjob design.” British Journal of Clinical 

Psycho logy. 2413 3 -44. 

Brown, J. and Campbell, E. 1990. “Sources of occupational stress in the police.” Work and 

Stress. 4(4):305-3 18. 

Brown, J. and Fielding,*,J. 1993. “Qualitative differences and women police officers’ experience 

of occupational stress.” Work and Stress. 7(4):327-340. 

Brown, S.E. 1984. “Police responses to wife beating: Neglect of a crime of violence. Journal 

of Criminal Justice. 12:277-288. 

Buunk, B. and Verhoeven, K. 1991. “Companionship and support at work: A microanalysis of 

the stress-reducing features of social interaction. I’ Basic and Applied SociaI Psychology. 

12(3):243-258. 

Chen, P., Spector, P., and Jex, S. 1995. “Effects of manipulated job stressors and job attitude on 

perceived job conditions: A simulation.” Pp. 341-356 in Organizational Risk Factors for 

Job Stress, edited by S. Sauter and L. Murphy. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological 

Association. 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Cooke, R. and Lafferty, J. 1986. Organizational Culture Inventory. Plymouth, MI: Human 

S ynergistics. 

Coontz, P., Lidz, C., and Mulvey, E. 1994. “Gender and the assessment of dangerousness in the 

psychiatric emergency room.” International Journal of Law and Psychiaby. 

17(4):369-376. 

Crowell, N., and Burgess, A (Eds). 1996. “Understanding Violence Against Women.” National 

Academy Press: Washington, D.C. 

Erez, E., Belknap, J. 1998. “In their own words: Battered women’s assessment of the criminal 

processing system’s responses. Violence and Victims. 13(3):25 1-268. 

Fischer, K., and Rose, M. 1995. “When ‘enough is enough’: Battered 

women’s decision-making around court orders of protection.” Crime and Delinquency. 

41(4):4 14-429. 

Frankenhaeuser, M. 1986. ”A psychobiological fi-amework for research on human stress and 

coping.“ Pp. 101 - 1 1-6 in Dynamics of Stress, edited by M. Appley and R. Trumbull. New 

York: Plenum. 

Franklin, A. and Hunt, E. 1993. “An emergency situation simulator for examining 

time-pressured decision making.” Behavior Research Methods y Instruments and 

Computers. 25(2): 143-147. 

Ganster, D. 1989. “Worker control and well-being: A review of research in the workplace.” 

Pp. 3-24 in Job Control and Worker Health, edited by S. Sauter, J. Hurrell Jr., and C. 

Cooper. New York: Wiley. 

Gondolf, E.W., and Fisher, E.R. 1988. “Battered women as survivors: An alternate to treating 

learned helplessness.” Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. 

Hamberger, L., and Hastings, J. 1993. .“Court mandated treatment of men who assault their 

partners.” 

Hart, P., Wearing, A., and Headey, B. 1994. ”Perceived quality of life, personality, and work 

experiences: Construct validation of the Police Daily Hassles and Uplifts Scales.” CriminaZ 

Justice and Behavior. 21(3):283-3 1 1. 

Hart, P., Wearing, A., and Headey, B. 1995. “Police stress and well-being: Integrating 

personality, coping and daily work experiences.” Journal of Occupational and 

Organizational Psychology. 68(2): 133-1 56. 

” _. 

i. 

& 

b k 

Hilberman, E., and Munson, L. 1977-78. “Sixty battered women.” Victimology. 2: 460-470. 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
differences in stress 

management.” Pp. 285-298 in Energetics and Human Information Processing, edited by G. 

Hockey, A. Gaillard, and M. Coles. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff 

. “Trauma and recovery: From stic abuse to political terror. London: 

Pandora. 

Hoq L.A. 1990. “Battered women as sur~ivors.~’ New York: Routledge. 

Houtman, I. and Kompier, M. 1995. “Risk factors and occupational risk groups for work stress 

in the Netherlands.” Pp. 209-225 in Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress, edited by S. 

Sauter and L. Murphy. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 

JaRe, D. 1995. “The healthy company: Research paradigms for personal and organizational 

health.” Pp. 13-39 in Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress, edited by S. Sauter and L. 

Murphy. Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association. 

Jones, B., Flynn, D., and Kelloway, E. 1995. “Perception of support from the organization in 

relation to work stress, satisfaction, and commitment.” Pp. 41 -52 in Organizational Risk 

Factors for Job Stress, edited by S. Sauter and L. Murphy. Washington, D.C.: American 

Psychological Association. 

Kantor, G.K., and Straus, M.A. 1990. “The ‘drunken bum’ theory of wife beating.” 

Kennedy, D., and Homant, R. 1983. “Attitudes of abused women toward male and female 

police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 10(4):39 1-405. 

Marshall, N. 1997. “The changing workforce, job stress, and psychological distress.” Journal 

of Occupational Health Psychology. 2(2):99- 107. 

McNiel, D., Myers, R., Zeiner, H., Wolfe, H., et al. 1992. “The role of violence in decisions 

about hospitalization from the psychiatric emergency room.” American Journal of 

Psychiatry. 149(2):207-212. . Q 

Miller, J., and Krull, A. 1997. “Controlling domestic violence: Victim resources and police 

intervention. In Kantor, G., and Jasinski, J. (Eds). 1997. “Out of the Darkness: 

Contemporary Perspectives on Family Violence.” Sage: London. 

Mitchell, R., and Hodson, C. 1983. “Coping with domestic violence: Social support and 

psychological health among battered ~omen.~’ American Journal of Community 

Psychology. 1 l(6): 629-654. 

Morris, A. 1996. “Gender and ethnic differences in social constraints among a sample of New 

York City police officers.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 1 (2):224-235. 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
f. 

Motowidlo, S., Packard, J., and Manning, M. 1986. 'I s: Its causes and 

consequences for job performance. I' Journal of 

Nachreiner, F., Lubeck-Ploger, 

health complaints as related to shiftwork exposure." and Stress. 9(2-3):221-234. 

Pagelow, M. 198 1. Woman Battering. Newbuxy Park, CA: Sage. 

Peterson, K. 1996. "Computers will dominate PSAPs of the fbture." American City h County. 

11 1(7):54. 

Poultney, J. 1997. "Eye-Q Dispatch Pro to prompt operators." MacKEEK. 1 1(18):35-36. 

Rabinowitz, J., Massad, A., and Fennig, S. 1995. "Factors influencing disposition decisions for 

patients seen in a psychiatric emergency service." Psychiatric Services. 46(7):712-718. 

Rabinowitz, J., Mark, M., and Slyuzberg, M. 1994. "How individual clinicians make admission 

decisions in psychiatric emergency rooms." Journal of Psychiatric Research. 

28(5):475-482. 

Radmacher, S. and Sheridan, C. 1995. "An investigation of the demand-control model ofjob 

strain." Pp. 127-138 in Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress, edited by S. Sauter and 

L. Murphy. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 

4 Schonfeld, I., Rhee, J., and Xia, F. 1995. ''Methodological issues in occupational-stress 

research: research in one occupational group and wider applications." Pp. 323-339 in 

Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress, edited by S. Sauter and L. Murphy. 

Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 

Sherman, L.W., and Berk, R.A. 1984. "The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic 

assault. American Psychological Review. 49:26 1-272. I 

Spelten, E,, Barton, J., and Folkard, S. 1993. "Have we underestimated shiftworkers' problems? 

Evidence from a 'reminiscence' study. Special Issue: Night and shiftwork." Ergonomics. 

36( 1-3):307-3 12. 

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Companies. 1985. The Human Factor. St. Paul, MN: 

Author. 

Tan, C., Basta. J., Sullivan, C., and Davidson 11, W. 1995. "The role of social support in the lives 

of women exiting domestic violence shelters: An experimental study." Journal of 

Interpersonal Violence. 10(4):437-45 1. 

Tattersall, A. and Farmer, E. 1995. "The regulation of work demands and strain." Pp. 139-156 

a in Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress, edited by S. Sauter and L. Murphy. 

Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.
Taylor, B.G. 1995. "An evaluation of the domestic violence prevention project. Internal 

Report. Research Division, Victim Services, New York. 

Thienhaus, 0. 1992. "Rational physical evaluation in the emergency room." HospitaZ and 

Community Psychiatry. 43(4):311-3 12. 

Tukey, J. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing 

Company. 

Turner, P. and Turner, T. 1991. "Validation of the Crisis Triage Rating Scale for psychiatric 

emergencies. I' Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 36(9):65 1-654. 

Van der Velde, M. and Class, M. 1995. "The relationship of role conflict and ambiguity to 

organizational culture." Pp. 53-59 in Organizational Risk Factors for Job Stress, edited by 

S. Sauter and L. Murphy. Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association. 

Wall, T. 1996. "The demands-control model ofjob strain: A more specific test." Journal of 

Occupational and Organizational PsychoZogy. 69(2) 3 53 - 1 66. 

Way, B., Evans, M., and Banks, S. 1992. "Factors predicting referral to inpatient or outpatient 

treatment from psychiatric emergency services. 'I Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 

43(7):703-708. 

Wearing, A. and Hart, P. 1996. "Work and non-work coping strategies: Their relation to 

personality, appraisal and life domain." StressMedicine. 12(2):93-103. 

Wiist, W., and McFarlane, J. 1998. "Utilization of police by abused pregnant hispanic women." 

. Violence Against Women. 4(6):677-693. 

Zapf, D. 1996. "Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: A review of the 

literature with reference to methodological issues." Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 

l(2): 145-169. 

\ 

This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report

has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those

of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.

Department of Justice.