alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATE        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.        1350)**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/  Enrique                  de Vilmorin                                                            |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
| Enrique                  de VilmorinChief                  Executive OfficerNovember                  19, 2007 |   |   |   |

----
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of E-City Software, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anis Jessa, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


     Anis Jessa
     ----------
     /s/

     Name: Anis Jessa
     Title: Chief Executive Officer
     Date: August 14, 2002
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



Board of Directors
Clover Community Bankshares, Inc.

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in Clover  Community
Bankshares, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-71777),  relating
to the  registration  of up to 50,000  shares of its common  stock for  issuance
pursuant to the Clover Community Bankshares, Inc. Dividend Reinvestment Plan, of
our report  dated  January  19,  2001,  which is  included  in Clover  Community
Bankshares,  Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2000.





                        s/Donald G. Jones and Company, P.A.


Columbia, South Carolina
March 12, 2001
No. 96-675.

#### Guilbeau et ux. *v.*W. W. Henry Co. et al.,

519 U. S. 1091. Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed further herein *informa pauperis*granted. Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32

                           Section 1350 Certifications

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of DND
Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

            To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 18, 2003

                                     BY:  /s/ Douglas N. Dixon
                                        ---------------------------
                                              DOUGLAS N. DIXON
                                         CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Dated: November 18, 2003

                                     BY:  /s/ Dennis Key
                                        --------------------------
                                              DENNIS KEY
                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
No. 43192.

#### Protest 968670-G of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of squawker balloons similar to those the subject of Abstract 40493. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 was therefore sustained.
No. 53270.

#### Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 40729-K/89572, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1349 

To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to clarify the effective 

date of policies covering properties affected by floods in progress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2011 

Mr. JOHANNS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to 

clarify the effective date of policies covering properties 

affected by floods in progress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE OF POLICIES COVERING 

4 PROPERTIES AFFECTED BY FLOODS IN 

5 PROGRESS. 

6 Paragraph (1) of section 1306(c) of the National 

7 Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4013(c)) is 

8 amended by adding after the period at the end the fol9 lowing: ‘‘With respect to any flood that has commenced 

10 or is in progress before the expiration of such 30-day peVerDate Mar 15 2010 01:46 Jul 14, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1349.IS S1349

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1349 IS

1 riod, such flood insurance coverage for a property shall 

2 take effect upon the expiration of such 30-day period and 

3 shall cover damage to such property occurring after the 

4 expiration of such period that results from such flood, but 

5 only if the property has not suffered damage or loss as 

6 a result of such flood before the expiration of such 30- 

7 day period.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, H. Douglas Chaffin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ H. Douglas ChaffinH. Douglas ChaffinChief Executive OfficerMay 16, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MBT Financial Corp. and will be retained by MBT Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Rudolf Lesch Fine Arts, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6532.

Entry No. 709503, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, August 1943, etc.

Certified August 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 30, 1943, etc.

(Decided November 19, 1946)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, .Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by'the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 54955.

#### Cuban American Products Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 130912-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 21



List of Subsidiaries



The Company has ten wholly-owned subsidiaries located throughout the world. The wholly-owned subsidiaries are as follows:



| | 1. | Mannatech Australia Pty Limited
| | -- | -------------------------------

| | 2. | Mannatech Limited
| | -- | -----------------

| | 3. | Mannatech Ltd.
| | -- | --------------

| | 4. | Mannatech Payment Services Incorporated
| | -- | ---------------------------------------

| | 5. | Mannatech Foreign Sales Corporation
| | -- | -----------------------------------

| | 6. | Internet Health Group, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------

| | 7. | Mannatech Japan, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------

| | 8. | Mannatech Limited
| | -- | -----------------

| | 9. | Mannatech Products Company, Inc.
| | -- | --------------------------------

| | 10. | Mannatech Korea, Ltd.
| | --- | ---------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the Annual Report of Nebraska Book Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark W.
Oppegard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                /s/ Mark W. Oppegard
                                ------------------------------------------------
                                Mark W. Oppegard
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                June 29, 2007
Before the First Division,

June 2, 1944

No. 49458.

#### Protests 108626-K, etc., of Rosenblatt & Towbin et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 **

U.S.C. § 636(c).

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTINA SANCHEZ,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

SUZETTE Z. TORRES; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-16651

D.C. No. 5:07-cv-04174-HRL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Howard R. Lloyd, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted June 15, 2011*** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 

Christina Sanchez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to

FILED

JUL 1 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-16651

prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse

of discretion the district court’s dismissal for failure to serve. Oyama v. Sheehan

(In re Sheehan), 253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir. 2001). We affirm. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action as to

defendants who had not voluntarily appeared because Sanchez failed to provide

proofs of service either within 120 days of filing her complaint or in the period

specified in the district court’s order, or to demonstrate good cause for her failure

to do so. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (requiring service within 120 days after the

complaint is filed, or within a time period specified by court order); In re Sheehan,

253 F.3d at 512 (discussing good cause standard); see also Wong v. Regents of

Univ. of Cal., 410 F.3d 1052, 1060 (9th Cir. 2005) (courts have authority to set and

enforce deadlines to foster the efficient resolution of cases).

Contrary to Sanchez’s contention, the district court did not abuse its

discretion by denying Sanchez’s third request for an extension of time to file a

third amended complaint. See Chodos v. West Publ’g Co., 292 F.3d 992, 1003

(9th Cir. 2002) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that the district

court’s discretion is particularly broad when it has already granted leave to amend).

Sanchez’s motion for judicial notice is denied. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2
 
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 I, Lana Pope, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Victor Industries, Inc.
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal annual that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting .
 
 
 By/s/ Lana PopeLana Pope, Chief FinancialOfficerDate June 16, 2004
(Reap. Dec. 9052)

#### Bemo Shipping Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 748325.

(Decided January 16, 1958)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*'George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the instant appeal for reappraisement consists of Jute Webbing exported from India.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation of the merchandise involved n this appeal the price at which *653such merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of India in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the U. S., including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the U. S. was the appraised value for each item of merchandise less ten per centum.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher-foreign value for such merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merhcandise here involved, and that such value was the appraised value for each item of merchandise, less 10 per centum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Corey Goodman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form
10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 12, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Corey Goodman
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Corey Goodman Chief Executive
Officer



I, John Doyle, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                |  |                                   
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 12, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John Doyle
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                |  | John Doyle Chief Financial
Officer
No. 48121.

#### Protest 91479-K of Ernest E. Marks Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When this case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. An examination of the papers failed to disclose any error on the part of the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
NO. SCWC-11-0000451

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LISA ANN PALI, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. CAAP-11-0000451; CR. NO. 05-1-0366(2))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, 

McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on

September 24, 2012 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Lisa Ann

Pali is hereby accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 7, 2012.

Summer M.M. Kupau, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioner 

 /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Artemio C. Baxa,

for respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

 

 /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

 /s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000451

07-NOV-2012

12:09 PM
No. 74-5893.

#### Skidmore *v.*Penn Central Transportation Co. et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.