alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
33600.

#### HUNTER v. HUNTER.

Argued June 12, 1978

Decided September 7, 1978.

Hill, Justice.

In this no-fault divorce case the wife appeals from a judgment awarding alimony based upon a jury verdict. She complains that the alimony awarded was too low and that the court erred in admitting certain testimony.

The wife, 60 years old, earns approximately $90 per week when working. The husband, 75, receives $200 per month from Social Security. The jury awarded the wife $100 per month alimony until she reaches age 65 or remarries. The wife seeks to set this award aside on the general grounds that the alimony award is contrary to the evidence and insufficient as a matter of law. We find that the award is supported by the evidence. *Williams v. Williams,*241 Ga. 32 (243 SE2d 69) (1978); *Thornhill v. Thornhill,*237 Ga. 900 (230 SE2d 284) (1976).

The wife’s other enumeration of error complains of the admission of certain testimony as to her conduct with another man some years before this divorce action. The husband asserted that her conduct caused him to move to a separate room, had a continuing effect on their relationship, and caused the eventual separation. A spouse who alleges that the marriage is irretrievably broken is not estopped from showing the conduct which caused it to be irretrievably broken. Such specific showing is not contrary to the general allegation. See Code § 30-201. Although it is undisputed that the conduct testified to occurred several years earlier, the jury was instructed as to condonation and under the facts of this case, we find no reversible error in this enumeration.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*95
      *J. A. Nolan,*for appellant.

*James E. Hudson, Rupert A. Brown,*for appellee.
No. 96-5820.

#### Lapierre *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 46417.

#### Protests 790154-G, etc., of Atlantic Sales Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Corey Goodman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Dated: May 9, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Corey Goodman
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Corey Goodman          
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, John Doyle, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renovis, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Renovis, Inc.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Dated: May 9, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John Doyle
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                |  | John Doyle             
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                |  | Chief Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

March 20, 1942

No. 47014.

#### Protests 983780-G, etc., of Butler Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1695-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-1695-DR), dated April 27, 2007, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

May 10, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Hampshire is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 27, 2007: 

Belknap County for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance.) 

Coos County for Public Assistance.

                        (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management                               ( print page 27836)                            Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)                    

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

 [FR Doc. E7-9513 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
(LOGO)
Chase Corporation
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus OH 43219

Exhibit I

         Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance with USAP Minimum
                              Servicing Standards

March 5, 1999

As of and for the  year  ended  December  31,  1998,  Chase  Manhattan  Mortgage
Corporation  ("CMMC") and Chase Mortgage Company ("CMC") and their  subsidiaries
(collectively,  the "Group")  have  complied in all material  respects  with the
minimum servicing  standards (the "Standards") set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
("USAP").

As noted in our  assertion  dated  March  26,  1998,  certain  CMMC's  custodial
accounts  and  related  bank  clearing  accounts  were  not  being  consistently
reconciled within 45 days. In addition,  a significant  number and dollar amount
of reconciling items documented on the  reconciliations  were not being resolved
within 90 days after identification.  These instances of noncompliance have been
remedied and  procedural  and  operational  enhancements  have been  implemented
during 1998 and  reconciliations  since this time have been completed within the
45 day minimum standard with reconciling  items being resolved within 90 days of
identification.

As of and for this same period, the Group had in effect fidelity bond and errors
and  omissions   policy  in  the  amounts  of   $250,000,000   and   $25,000,000
respectively.


Thomas Jacob
Chief Executive Officer


Patrick Coon
Executive Vice President of Servicing

Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation

Page 2

Glenn Mouridy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Lucy Gambino
Vice President of Risk Management

<PAGE>

Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation
3415 Vision Drive
Columbus, OH 43219

September 15, 1998

Ms. Kimberly Wiggins
Contracts & Compliance Administrator
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044

Dear Ms. Wiggins:

This letter is in response to your letter dated August 26, 1998,  regarding  the
exception disclosed on the 1997 USAP Report.

Chase  Manhattan  Mortgage  Corporation  (CMMC) is  pleased  to report  that all
custodial accounts are reconciled current as of March 31,1998. Additionally, all
clearing accounts are reconciled current as of April 30,1998.

CMMC has increased its management and staffing  levels in the areas  responsible
for  maintaining  the custodial and clearing  account.  Management  continues to
diligently  monitor alt the custodial  and clearing  accounts to ensure that all
accounts are reconciled timely.

Should you have any questions regarding the information provided,  please do not
hesitate to contact me at (614) 422-7722.

Sincerely,

Lucy P. Gambino
Vice President
Risk Management Department

cc: N. Taylor
Exhibit 31.2

I, Paul Bailey, the chief financial officer of Iroquois Gas Transmission
System, L.P., certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Iroquois Gas
Transmission System, L.P.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

DATE: August 22, 2005

/S/ PAUL BAILEY
---------------------
PAUL BAILEY
VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Technologies Group,
Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), the
undersigned, Alex Stelmak, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: September 20, 2010

                                    /s/ Alex Stelmak
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Alex Stelmak
                                    Chief Executive Officer,
                                    Chairman of the Board and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6076.

Invoice dated Sonneberg, Germany, September 29, 1939.

Certified October 2, 1939.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., November 6, 1939.

Entry No. 1525/4.

(Decided December 4, 1944)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

KiNCHeloe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoice with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, are> in all material respects the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraisements 113038-A, 113,040-A, and 113468-A of the F. W. Woolworth Co. and passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman & Co., Rice & Co. Corp., Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> It is further stipulated and agreed, that on the date of exportation of the merchandise involved in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3J4 per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeal is abandoned.

> *415It is further stipulated and ,agreed, that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeal to reappraisement is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus *3}{*per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT A.W., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4148 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) )

Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 30, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Mark Hofstad, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison C. Heim, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134985 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134985 COA: 270538 Allegan CC: 03-013251-FC WILLIAM JASON WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-102089, 333-102091, 333-64193, 333-90361, 333-140108, and 333-155633 on Form S-8, No. 333-109116 and 333-140175 on Form S-3 and No. 333-90597 on Form S-4 of our report dated June 24, 2009, relating
to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of School Specialty, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of School Specialty, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended April 25, 2009.



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                            
|Milwaukee, Wisconsin        
|June 24, 2009
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Deputy Commander Imparts Words of Wisdom

By Brenda MinnemaDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
The Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Professional Self-Development Program, known as Level I Mentoring Program, trains associates on various aspects of professional and personal development as well as networking skills to help prepare for advancement opportunities and career success.

Steven Alsup. DLA Land and Maritime deputy commander, kicked off the first of 10 monthly sessions May 9 in the Building 20 Command Conference Room at the Defense Supply Center Columbus.  

Twenty of the 31 associates in this year's program were able to engage in an interactive presentation "Navigating Your Career," a topic chosen by Alsup.  

Several of this year's mentors participated and had questions answered as well.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MMentoring L&MCulture L&MDevelop Leaders L&MPeople & Culture L&MCommand L&MPersonal Development L&M
Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C371982DO... 8/24/2011
No. 43182.

#### Protests 987418-G, etc., of F. O. Merz *&*Co. (New York).

*390Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of embossed leather similar to that passed upon in Abstract 42423. The claim at 30 percent under paragraph 1530 (d) was therefore sustained.