alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6660

MARION WESLEY CARTER, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus D. T. MAHON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-888) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marion Wesley Carter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Lance Bradford Leggitt, Vaughan Christopher Jones, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Mahon , No. CA-96-888 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. D-44.

#### In re Disbarment of Morgan.

It is ordered that Edward LeRoy Morgan, of Phoenix, Ariz., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
| Ø | Contract      number: 4431702009C100000100; |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Loan      principal:RMB 50 million; |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Loan      term: from June 23, 2009 to June 23,  2010; |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Interest      rate: fixed at 4.779%; |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|

|   | n | Interest      accrued and settled per month, interest settlement day is the 20th day      of each month; |
|--------|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | n | Penalty      interest rate for delayed repayment: 4.779% plus 50%    *4.779%; |
|--------|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | n | Penalty      interest rate for embezzlement of loan proceeds:      4.779% *1; |
|--------|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Purpose      of the loan is to provide workingcapital; |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Advanced      repayment of loan needs to be approved by the    Creditor; |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Breach      of contract penalties: correct the breach of contract in time limit;      suspension of loan unprovided; release loan agreement, demand      prepayment of loan principal and interest before maturity; imposition      of punitive interest incurred due to delayed loan; imposition of punitive      interest for embezzlement of loan; imposition of plural interest for      unpaid interest; withdraw from any accounts of the Company the loan      principal, interest and other fees; compensation for the Creditor’s      expenses incurred due to demanding the loan principal and interest in case      of litigation, etc. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Ø | Disputation      settlement |
|--------|-----------------------------|

| Ø | Supplemental |
|--------|--------------|

| Ø | Notification |
|--------|--------------|

----
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: November 8, 2006 /s/ Donald R. Mayer Donald R. Mayer, Principal Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10859]


Maine Disaster Number ME-00007

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Maine (FEMA-
1693-DR), dated 04/25/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Inland and Coastal Flooding.
    Incident Period: 04/15/2007 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 04/30/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/25/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road Fort, Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Maine, 
dated 04/25/2007, is hereby amended to include the following areas as 
adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Franklin, Hancock, Lincoln, Sagadahoc, Somerset, and 
Waldo.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-9488 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2015221EN.01000701.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/7

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 May 2015 — Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals v Council

(Case T-310/12) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of oxalic acid originating in India and China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Community industry - Determination of injury - Article 9(4), Article 14(1) and Article 20(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Right to make representations - Article 20(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009))

(2015/C 221/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd (Yuan Ping City, Xin Zhou, China) (represented by: V. Akritidis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, Agent, and initially by N. Chesaites, Barrister, and G. Berrisch, lawyer, and subsequently by D. Geradin, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 325/2012 of 12 April 2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of oxalic acid originating in India and the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2012 L 106, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 325/2012 of 12 April 2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of oxalic acid originating in India and the People’s Republic of China in so far as it concerns Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 325/2012 of 12 April 2012 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of oxalic acid originating in India and the People’s Republic of China in so far as it concerns Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd;

| 2) | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd, other than the costs incurred by the latter as a result of the European Commission’s intervention; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd, other than the costs incurred by the latter as a result of the European Commission’s intervention;

| 3) | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd as a result of the European Commission’s intervention. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals Co. Ltd as a result of the European Commission’s intervention.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.

1

---
No. 44320.

#### Protest 840270-G of Tucker & Goodheart (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise. is bodies, hoods, forms, or shapes similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.
Case No. 8,664.

#### In re McBRIDE.

[1 Wkly. Notes Cas. 42.]

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 21, 1874.

Bankruptcy Practice — Costs.

Proof of notice to petitioning creditors being made, THE COURT ordered that the clerk tax register’s and clerk’s costs and fees, and that the bankrupt pay the same.
Before the Third Division,

February 11, 1942

No. 46946.

#### Protest 947558-G of A. W. Fenton Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The owner of the importing company testified that he had been in the waste material business for many years dealing in every kind of waste material; had sold such material throughout the United States during the last 25. years and had seen the manner in which such customers used the waste materials sold by his company. He further testified that the merchandise listed as No. 2 grade cotton canvas was all sold as paper stock; that at and prior to June, 1930, similar merchandise was sold and used as paper stock, and that he had been unable to discover any other use for this grade of cotton canvas. No further testimony was produced. On the record presented the court held No. 2 grade cotton canvas entitled to free entry as paper stock under paragraph 1750 as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Nebraska Book Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan G.
Siemek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



                                                 /s/  Alan G. Siemek
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Alan G. Siemek
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 June 25, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1332

ZARA ELLIS SADLER, PHD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BARBARA CLAIRE TILLEY, PHD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(2:05-cv-03234-DCN)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zara Ellis Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Morris Dawes Cooke, Jr.,

Lucinda Gardner Wichmann, John William Fletcher, Alissa DeCarlo,

BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON & HELMS, LLC, Charleston, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Zara Ellis Sadler seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying her motion for appointment of counsel. This court

may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Sadler seeks to appeal

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We also deny Sadler’s motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Opinion issued May 16, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 16 - 00 8 0 1 - CV

——————————— JUSTIN GORDON HOMES, LLC , Appellant

V. DUSTIN BECK , Appellee
On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2 0 16 - 210 7 0

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Justin Gordon Homes, LLC , has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 5, 20.1; see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a), 101.041 (1) ( West2

2013 & Supp. 201 6 ); Fees Charged in the Supreme Cou rt, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and B efore the Judicial Panel on Multi

- D istrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No . 1 5

- 91 58 (Tex. Aug. 28 , 201 5 ). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution . We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Huddle, and L l oy d
.
Exhibit 12 (a)

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                          (in thousands, except ratios)


                                                             Twelve-month
                                                             period ended
                                                           December 31, 1998
                                                           -----------------

Net income...............................................    $     53,432
Fixed Charges
      Audit Fees.........................................              30
      Trustee Fees.......................................             120
      Administrative Fees................................              50
                                                             ------------
Total Fixed Charges......................................             200
                                                             ------------
Earnings before fixed charges............................          53,632
Fixed charges, as above..................................             200
                                                             ------------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.......................             268.16
                                                             ===============
No. 74-929.

#### David R. McGeorge Car Co., Inc. *v.*Leyland Motor Sales, Inc., et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 96-454.

#### Associates Commercial Corp. *v.*Rash et ux.

C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 519 U. S. 1086.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
Before the First Division,

December 8, 1950

No. 54959.

#### Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6745-R (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The merchandise was entered and appraised on the basis of cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930. The entered value included an item as to the allocation of certain nonrecurring costs, consisting of composition, proofreading, plates, etc., based upon an edition of 65,000 copies, of which 20,000 had been printed at the time of exportation, while the appraised value included an item for the said nonrecurring costs based upon the 20,000 copies which had been printed. Petitioner determined to establish a test case, which was done, and the matter was prosecuted to a final determination by the appellate court in *Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc.*v. *United Stales*(36 C. C. P. A. 102, C. A. D. 405), which was adverse to the petitioner’s contention. From the record the court was satisfied that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc. of
Nevada;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.




                             /s/ Donald R. Mayer
Date: July 31, 2003          ____________________________________________
                             Donald R. Mayer, Principal Financial Officer