alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (551)
<INVENTORY>                                        361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,474
<PP&E>                                           4,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,203)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,655
<COMMON>                                         1,131
<OTHER-SE>                                     (18,640)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    (1,854)
<SALES>                                         26,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,772
<CGS>                                            3,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (294)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,072)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.41)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.41)   
                                               

</TABLE>
33679.

#### McELROY v. McELROY.

Submitted June 2, 1978

Decided September 5, 1978.

Per curiam.

It is not required that alimony be awarded in no-fault divorce cases. *Odom v. Odom,*239 Ga. 830 (239 SE2d 20) (1977); Code Ann. § 30-201, as amended (Ga. L. 1977, pp. 1253, 1256). The trial judge did not err in charging the jury in accord with the foregoing.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*85
      *Glenville Haldi,*for appellant.

*Albert C. Smarr,*for appellee.
exv10w35



 





Exhibit 10.35




AMENDMENT dated 30 April 2007




of the




SERVICES AND MATERIALS AGREEMENT dated 20 April 2007




By and between




SCOTTISH BIOMEDICAL LIMITED T/A “SCOTTISH BIOMEDICAL”




and OMEROS CORPORATION




     This is an amendment (this “Amendment”) effective 30 April 2007, between Scottish Biomedical
Limited T/A “Scottish Biomedical” (“Scottish Biomedical”) and Omeros Corporation (“Omeros”) of the
Services and Materials Agreement dated 20 April 2007 (“the Agreement”) related to Omeros’ PDE10
program.



     The Agreement is hereby amended to replace original Appendix 1 (pages 20-22 of the Agreement)
with the corrected Appendix 1 attached hereto (amended pages 20-22).



     All other terms of the Agreement remain unchanged and in force. This Amendment is accepted
and acknowledged by each party, as of the effective date set forth herein above, through the
signature of its authorized representatives below:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	SCOTTISH BIOMEDICAL LIMITED	 	 	 	OMEROS CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Eric Smith
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Gregory A. Demopulos
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Eric Smith
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Gregory A. Demopulos, M.D.
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:

	 	Finance Director
	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Chairman & CEO
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 




† DESIGNATES PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT THAT HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION




Amended 20




 









 





Appendix 1




Proposed alterations to current catechols.




     [†]


† DESIGNATES PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT THAT HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION




Amended
21
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #10859] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Maine (FEMA-1693-DR), dated 04/25/2007. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Inland and Coastal Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         04/15/2007 and continuing.                     

*Effective Date:*                         04/30/2007.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/25/2007.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road Fort, Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Maine, dated 04/25/2007, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster. 

Primary Counties: Franklin, Hancock, Lincoln, Sagadahoc, Somerset, and Waldo. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E7-9488 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mniteb**~tate~** 

# QCourt of**~peal~** 

# for tbejfeberal QCircuit

02 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LTD. AND 02 MICRO INC., Appellants, 

### v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND MICROSEMI CORPORATION, • Intervenor. 2010-1482 On appeal from the United States InternationalTrade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-666. ON MOTION

ORDER 02 Micro International, Ltd. and 02 Micro, Inc. move to withdraw their appeal. Upon consideration thereof,02MICRO INTL LTD v. ITC IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. (2) Each side shallbear its own costs. 

## FEB 01 2012 Date
cc: Henry C. Bunsow, Esq. 

### s21 PanyinA. Hughes, Esq. Mark W. Yocca, Esq. FOR THE COURT lsI Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Issued As A Mandate: __ F_E_B_O.:....:..1-=2..:..01-=2__ 2

FILED U.S. COURTOF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT



### FEB 01 2012

JANHORBALY 

### CLERK
No. 44302.

#### Protest 804528-G of Brand Bros., Inc. (New York).

*312Opinion by

Cline, J.

The sausage casings in question were packed in barrels and the record showed that four barrels were marked “Tientsin” and three were marked “Yokohama.” They were marked with the word “China” before thej7' were released from customs custody. On the authority of *Ellis*v. *United States*(3 Cust. Ct. 231, C. D. 242), holding that the name of a city alone is not sufficient, the protest was overruled.
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133750 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133751 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, JEFFREY BROOKSHIRE, Personal Justices 

Representative of the Estate of

Jeannette Brookshire,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133750, 133751 

 COA: 257214, 257629 

Washtenaw CC: 03-000731-NH 

BHARTIBEN PATEL, M.D.,

PATEL INTERNAL MEDICINE
 ASSOCIATES, P.C., KELLY

MANDAGERE, M.D., ANN ARBOR 

ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES 

ASSOCIATES, P.C., NANCYLEE

STIER, M.D., ANN ARBOR 

INPATIENT PHYSICIANS, P.L.L.C., 

ROBERT URBANIC, M.D., and

TRINITY HEALTH--MICHIGAN, 

d/b/a ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL,

f/k/a MERCY HEALTH SERVICES,

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 24, 2007, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 

2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879). On order of the Court, the case 

having been decided on November 28, 2007, ___ Mich ___ (2007), the application is 

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, 

we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, REINSTATE the order of the 

Washtenaw Circuit Court denying the defendants' motion for summary disposition, and 

REMAND this case to the Washtenaw Circuit Court for further proceedings not 

inconsistent with this order and the order in Mullins. 

l1211 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 14, 2007 

Clerk
No. 45232.

#### Protest 3693-K of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

On the agreed facts the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397; Abstract 43785 followed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRE SHERMAN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

DWIGHT NEVEN,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-15999

D.C. No. 2:05-CV-00362-JCM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Andre Sherman appeals from the district court’s

judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

FILED

FEB 17 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-15999

Sherman contends that the state court’s denial of his motion to exclude

unduly suggestive field and pre-trial in-court identifications violated his

constitutional rights. The state court’s determination that the challenged

identifications were sufficiently reliable was not contrary to, or an unreasonable

application of, clearly established United States Supreme Court precedent. See 28

U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); see also Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199 (1972). 

We construe Sherman’s additional arguments as a motion to expand the

certificate of appealability. So construed, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 

22-1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per

curiam).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

                                                              Exhibit 10.11(a)



                    FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made and
entered into as of the 16th day of September, 1998 by and between UniCapital
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Jonathan New 
("Employee").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee entered into an Employment Agreement (the
"Agreement") dated May 20th, 1998; and

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement in the manner
hereinafter set forth;

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties intending to be bound legally, hereby agree as
follows:

     1.   Section 4.1 is hereby amended to read as follows:

          "4.1 SALARY. The Employee shall receive an annual salary of Three
          Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) during the Term of this
          Agreement, and such salary shall be payable in installments consistent
          with the Company's normal payroll schedule commencing on either the
          first or fifteenth day of the month, as the case may be, following the
          Effective Date."


Except as otherwise provided in Section 1 hereof, all of the terms and 
provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Employee have caused this instrument to
be executed the day and year first above written.


                                              UNICAPITAL CORPORATION:


                                              By: /s/ THEODORE J. ROJENSKI
                                                 -------------------------------

                                              Title: Chief Operating Officer
                                                    ----------------------------


                                              EMPLOYEE:

                                              /s/ JONATHAN NEW
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Jonathan New
### Development of underground waters in the central coastal plain region of southern California

By: Walter Curran Mendenhall

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp138

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00462-CV

IN RE Gloria ZARATE

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On June 27, 2014, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered 

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion 

will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on July 2nd, 2014.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of July, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 10-08-49259, styled Green Tree Servicing, LLC as Successor Servicer for 

BAHS- A Division of Bank of America, FSB v. Gloria T. Zarate and Rene Zarate Jr., pending in the 79th Judicial 

District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas, the Honorable Richard C. Terrell presiding.
Texas Department of 

Transportation and Ballenger 

Construction Company, s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 5, 2014

No. 04-14-00063-CV

Hetul BHAKTA D/B/A Budget Inn,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and Ballenger Construction Company, 

Inc.,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-04-15888-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The District Clerk’s Notification of Late Record is GRANTED. The clerk’s record is due 

on February 14, 2014.

___________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of February, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Obernesser, Chief Financial Officer of Correctional Properties
Trust (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |                                                       |  |  | 
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|                     |                                                       | 
|Date: March 12, 2004 | /s/ David J. Obernesser                               | 
|                     | David J. Obernesser                                   | 
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
Correctional Properties Trust | 
|
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131966 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131966 COA: 264594 Oakland CC: 04-195032-FH ROY EDGAR WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 14, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

W EAVER and K ELLY , JJ., would direct the Cour t of Appeals to accept the defendant’s Standard 4 brief.

t1220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4042

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL THOMAS POTTS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-98-50) Submitted: January 31, 2000 Decided: February 15, 2000 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Arthur Webb, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Lisa B.Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Thomas Potts appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994). On appeal, Potts contends that his due process rights were offended because he did not receive “actual” notice of the Government’s intent to seek enhanced penalties under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B) (1994). See 21 U.S.C. § 851(a)(1) (1994). Our review of the record and the proceedings before the district court reveals no reversible error with respect to Potts’ notice of and opportunity to be heard regarding the possibility of an enhanced sentence as a result of his recidivism. See Oyler v. Boles , 368 U.S. 448, 452 (1962); United States v. Belanger, 970 F.2d 416, 418(7th Cir. 1992). In addition, we can discern no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court with respect to the admission of Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) evidence tending to prove that Potts possessed crack cocaine with the requisite intent to distribute. See United States v. Powers , 59 F.3d 1460, 1464-65 (4th Cir. 1995). Finding no merit to either of Potts’ contentions on appeal, we affirm the conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UAVRG, LLC Pre-Mission Planning 

1 | P a g e

Review Propose Flight Area/NOTAM/TFR/Airspace Constrants
UAVRG, LLC Pre-Mission Planning 

2 | P a g e

Insturment Approach VOR/DME Rwy 22 – Alt 2200AGL 
UAVRG, LLC Pre-Mission Planning 

3 | P a g e

Sunrise/Sunset/UAVForecast

Terminal Area Forecast Nearest Station 
UAVRG, LLC Pre-Mission Planning 

4 | P a g e

Review Flight Plan
No. 96-5799.

#### Rodgers *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.