alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1332
ZARA ELLIS SADLER, PHD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BARBARA CLAIRE TILLEY, PHD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:05-cv-03234-DCN) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Zara Ellis Sadler, Appellant Pro Se. Morris Dawes Cooke, Jr., Lucinda Gardner Wichmann, John William Fletcher, Alissa DeCarlo, BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON & HELMS, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Zara Ellis Sadler seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Sadler seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny Sadler’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Ohio Lt. Governor visits the Defense Supply Center Columbus

By Michael L. JonesDLA Land and Maritime

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. Michelle Skubic (right), greets The Honorable Mary Taylor, Lt. Gov. of Ohio, as she arrives for an orientation visit at the Defense Supply Center Columbus Aug. 25. 

Skubic led her leadership team in a full DLA mission briefing which included warfighter support capabilities performed at DSCC and other worldwide operating locations. 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service and military reserve leadership also provided briefings on their capabilities and contributions to the nation’s defense provided at DSCC. 

Taylor participated in a guided tour of the DSCC installation as the final part of her orientation visit before leaving.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCommand L&MCommunity L&MOhio Lt. GovernorMary TaylorDSCCDFAS L&M
October 22, 2010

Conference Call Summary

A conference call was held on Friday, October 22,2010 at 1O:00amwith Kelly Haragan with the University ofTexas at Austin, School ofLaw Environmental Clinic. The purpose ofthe call was for EPA to listento Ms. Haragan discuss the issues raised in comments submitted underher signature to EPA Region 6 on June 28, 2010. She had earlier asked for a call with EPA.

In attendance from EPA were Dr. Al Armendariz, Larry Starfield, LaylaMansuri, Chrissy Mann, Tom Diggs, Suzanne Smith, and Guy Donaldson. Ms. Haragan was the only attendee from outside EPA and she participated by phone.
It was made very clear at the beginning ofthe call by Suzanne Smith, EPA Counsel, that due to the commentperiod having closed, we could only listen to points Ms. Haragan had made in her comments and we would notbe asking for clarification or any additional information during the call.

Ms. Haragan discussed 3 main levels ofcomment. 1. She discussed abroad legal issue, raised in her comments ofJune 28, 2010, where she contends EPA does nothave the authority to approve an affirmative defense where a court could not grantpenalties in a citizen suit. She stressed that EPA cannot approve a rule limiting the factors a court may consider in assessing penalties. She said when a court develops its factors, then they can decide the merits. She stated some ofthe factors the court can consider (size ofcompany, economic impact, seriousness ofviolation) and referred us to her comments for a

.detailed list. Ms. Haragan said EPA should notrush a decision due to the

importance ofthe issue. 2. Another issue was her contentionthat approving the Texas affirmative defense into the Texas SIP would violate Texas law. Her comment was the Texas Heath

. and Safety Code, allowing for affirmative defense, only applies to TCEQ

enforcement actions and to theirpenalties. Ifthis was put inthe SIP, then it could extend to citizen actions. Details ofthis comment are onpage 4 ofherJune 28; 2010 commentletter. 3. Final pointraised was herpositionthatthere is no question that these events cause exceedances to the NAAQS, and the use ofcitizen suits is helping inthe effortto reduce pollution.

Ms. Haragan said her students were preparing for briefing this for court challenge.
#### Marion Francis GOWAN, IPP v. Michael S. INGRAM, Judge.

No. 98-C-2696.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

Prior report: La.App., 718 So.2d 614.

In re Ingram, Michael S. Judge; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 97-0683; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 31037-CA.

Denied.

MARCUS, VICTORY and KNOLL, JJ., would grant the writ.

TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.
Order entered August 7, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01355-CR

L.D. MILLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-27250-Y

ORDER

The reporter’s record was originally due in this appeal on December 7, 2014. This Court 

has granted court reporter Sharon Hazlewood a thirty-day extension of time to file the record. 

On June 9, 2015, the Court ordered court reporters Melva Key and Sharon Hazlewood to file the 

reporter’s record by July 15, 2015. On July 15, 2015, Ms. Key filed the portions of the record 

she had recorded. She also filed a letter stating that Volume 2, which contains voir dire, was not 

being filed because Ms. Hazlewood had not provided her that volume to include with the record. 

To date, Ms. Hazlewood has neither filed Volume 2 containing voir dire nor communicated with 

the Court regarding the status of that record. The appeal cannot proceed until the reporter’s 

record is complete.
Accordingly, we ORDER Sharon Hazlewood, former official court reporter of the 

Criminal District Court No. 7, to file, by AUGUST 20, 2015, the reporter’s record of the April 

14, 2014 pretrial hearing. 

FAILURE OF SHARON HAZLEWOOD, FORMER OFFICIAL COURT 

REPORTER OF THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 7, TO FILE 

THE SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF THE APRIL 14, 2014 PRETRIAL 

HEARING BY THE DATE HEREIN SET FORTH MAY RESULT IN THE 

ISSUANCE OF A SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND/OR A JUDGMENT OF 

CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CONTEMPT.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Elizabeth Frizell, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; Sharon Hazlewood, former official court 

reporter, Criminal District Court No. 7; Vearneas Faggett, official court reporter, Criminal 

District Court No. 7; the Texas Court Reporter’s Certification Board; and to counsel for all 

parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
No. 55539.

Suit 4636.

#### United States *v.*Union Olive Oil Co., Inc.

C. D. 1195 reversed October 31, 1950. C. A. D. 442.
EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0538
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 17 - 00271 - CR TIMOTHY DANFORTH, AP PELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 2

McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016 - 0698 - CR2, Honorable T. Bradley Cates, Presiding



### June 3 , 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and P ARKER , JJ. Pending before the c ourt is the motion of appellant Timothy Danforth to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and his attorney have signed the motion. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a) . As n o decision of the c ourt ha s been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. James T. Campbell Justice Do not publish.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSCAR GARCIA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

REGIONAL TRUSTEE SERVICES

CORPORATION and MORTGAGE

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION

SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 13-16528

D.C. No. 

3:11-cv-00470-RCJ-VPC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 21, 2016** 

San Francisco, California

FILED

OCT 26 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except

as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Before: HAWKINS and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and SOTO,*** District

Judge.

 

Oscar Garcia (“Garcia”) appeals the Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal and adverse grant

of summary judgment. We affirm.

There was no abuse of discretion in judicially noticing mortgage and

foreclosure documents related to Garcia’s Nevada property. As matters of public

record they are proper subjects of judicial notice. See Ormsby v. First Am. Title Co.

of Nev., 591 F.3d 1199, 1203 (9th Cir. 2010) (records of real property transactions are

“official public records”); Fed. R. Evid. 201(b). Moreover, taking judicial notice of

the documents did not prejudice Garcia because the district court did not rely on them

in dismissing his claims. See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Herron, 634 F.3d 1101, 1110 (9th

Cir. 2011) (reversal based on erroneous evidentiary rulings requires showing

prejudice). 

Nor did the district court abuse its discretion in admitting Melissa Hjorton’s

declaration. Hjorton demonstrated personal knowledge in her declaration. See

Barthelemy v. Air Lines Pilots Ass’n, 897 F.2d 999, 1018 (9th Cir. 1990) (court can

infer personal knowledge from an affidavit itself). 

* ** The Honorable James Alan Soto, United States District Judge for the

District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

2
Finally, because Garcia did not specifically and distinctly address other issues

in his opening brief, they are abandoned on appeal. Miller v. Fairchild Indus., Inc.,

797 F.2d 727, 738 (9th Cir. 1986) (court of appeals will not ordinarily consider

matters not specifically and distinctly argued in the opening brief).

AFFIRMED.

3
### The occurrence of zeunerite at Brooks Mountain, Seward Peninsula, Alaska

By: Walter S. WestMax Gregg White

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir214

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
From: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE)

To: Adams, Lucy H.

Cc: Marinshaw, Richard

Subject: RE: Subpart N request - Chromium electroplating

Date: Monday, February 28, 2011 10:46:11 AM

Good Monday Lucy,

There may be additional information regarding each

facility that you are looking at in the facility file. 

However, we do not have the staffing resources to

conduct this review for you. We welcome you to come

review the facility files to obtain the additional

information you seek. You may also want to contact

each facility directly to gather the additional information

you need. Sorry we cannot be of further assistance.

Teresa

Teresa Seidel

Air Quality Division

Acting Field Operations Supervisor

Lansing 517-373-7037

Warren - 586-753-3730

Detroit - 313-456-4680

"Solution is possible where acceptance is ready."

 - Pearl S Buck

From: Adams, Lucy H. [mailto:lhadams@rti.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:00 AM

To: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE)

Cc: Marinshaw, Richard

Subject: Subpart N request - Chromium electroplating

Dear Ms. Seidel;

Thank you for sending the test reports. Now that we have had a chance to review the information,

we would like to know if more facility and operations information might be available. For each

facility, EPA could use information on:
Tank dimensions

Rectifier capacity (amperes)

Limits on rectifier operation (ampere-hours per year)

Maximum permitted process operating hours (hours per year)

Typical process operating hours (hours per year)

I have found permits for the two Lacks facilities and Perfection Industries, but the information

 listed above is not in the permits. Is this information available in other documents such as permit

applications or compliance reports, and could those be sent as well?

Thank you for your help,

Lucy Adams

RTI International

308B 800 Building

Phone: 919-316-3916

Email: lhadams@rti.org

www.rti.org
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00173-CR

Don Reed

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F-2012-2654-C)

August 26, 2016

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth____________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOutput Measurement Equations for Flexible Aircraft Flight DynamicsA summary of output measurement equations for onboard sensors used in flight testing of flexible aircraft is presented. These equations include the effects of structural flexibility and are considerably more complex than the standard equations for rigid-body aircraft. The output equations discussed include accelerations from linear accelerometers, strains, angular rates, angular accelerations, Euler angles, true airspeed, and air flow angles. The output equations are derived in full form and then simplified in some cases. Linearized output equations, suitable for state-space or transfer function models, are also developed. Example flight test data from the X-56A subscale aeroelastic demonstrator is discussed, for reference.Document ID20180007917Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGrauer, Jared A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Boucher, Matthew J.*(NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 29, 2018Publication DateOctober 1, 2018Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2018-220102L-20956NF1676L-31027Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.07.02.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180007917.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Report (as defined under the preceding Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, Allen D. Goodman, Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the
general partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|By: /s/ Allen D. Goodman                        
|Allen D. Goodman                                
|Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer
|May 16, 2005                                    



E-5
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1406 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California, as the 

Myron Donovan Crocker United States Courthouse. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1406 ES

1 SECTION 1. MYRON DONOVAN CROCKER UNITED STATES 

2 COURTHOUSE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse 

4 under construction, as of the date of enactment of this 

5 Act, at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Myron Donovan Crocker 

7 United States Courthouse’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the United States courthouse referred to in sub11 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

12 ‘‘Myron Donovan Crocker United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the Senate July 26, 2011. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1406 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse under 

United States Courthouse. California, as the Myron Donovan Crocker construction at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
No. 54312.

#### Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. *v.*United States,

protest 150710-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector *453as manifested, not found, were not in fact .received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.
(LOGO)

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

1300 Huntington Building
925 Euclid Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44115-1405

Phone: 216 861 5000

Report on Management's Assertion on Compliance with Minimum Servicing Standards
Set Forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
National City Mortgage Co.

We have examined  management's  assertion,  included in the accompanying  report
titled Report of Management, that National City Mortgage Co. (NCM) complied with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) during
the year ended December 31, 1998. Management is responsible for NCM's compliance
with  those  requirements.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an  opinion  on
management's assertions about NCM's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  NCM's  compliance  with  those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered  necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination  provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on NCM's
compliance with specified requirements.

In  our  opinion,   management's   assertion,   that  NCM   complied   with  the
aforementioned  requirements  during the year ended December 31, 1998, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

Ernst &Young LLP

January 29, 1999

Ernst &Young LLP is a member of Ernst &Young International, Ltd.