alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Ben
      Jamil, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      November 19, 2007




/s/
                Ben
                JamilBen
                Jamil, Chief Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 8433)

Entry No. 964109, etc.

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided May 10, 1955)

*Jordan & Klingaman*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, hare been submitted upon a stipulation to the effect that on or about the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by said appeals the said merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, at the invoice unit values plus 14 per centum plus 1.01 per centum plus packing, and that there was no higher export value therefor.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, I find the proper dutiable foreign value of the merchandise covered by said appeals to be the invoice units of value plus 14 per centum plus 1.01 per centum plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1937, Part I, North Atlantic slope basins

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp821

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6105

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

MARVIN MARCO GRAHAM, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00002-GCM-1; 3:07-cv-00417-GCM) 

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 29, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Marvin Marco Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Christopher Morris, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Marvin Marco Graham seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2009) motion to vacate. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). “A denial of a motion to amend 

a complaint is not a final order, nor is it an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order.” Bridges v. Dep’t of Md. 

State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 206 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, 

we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# C_2016090EN.01000301.xml

| 7.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 3 November 2015 — Konrad Erzberger v TUI AG

(Case C-566/15)

(2016/C 090/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Kammergericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Konrad Erzberger

Applicant:

Defendant: TUI AG

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is it compatible with Article 18 TFEU (non-discrimination) and Article 45 TFEU (freedom of movement for workers) for a Member State to grant the right to vote and stand as a candidate for the employees’ representatives in the supervisory body of a company only to those workers who are employed in establishments of the company or in affiliated companies within the domestic territory?

---
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/04

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
EPAHydraulicFracturingWorkshop,February24‐25,2011,Workshop1,ChemicalsTrackingFractureFluidMovementwithChemicalandGamma‐EmittingTracerswithVerificationbyMicroseismicRecordingGEKieorge.ngApacheCorporationSourcesofTracingandMonitoringDataDataSourcesPreCompletionDataSourcesFrac&PostFracSources–Completion•3‐Dseismic•GeologicalstructureDataSources–Frac&PostFrac•FracpumprecordmatchtoMicroseismicGeologicalstructuremap•PetrophysicalEvalstoMicroseismic•Low‐levelgammatracer‐markingofprop•Drilling/Logging•Mud‐Logs&GasShowsmarkingofprop•Fluidtracersinbackflow•Recoveredbrinesalinity,Shows•OffsetwellproductionRecoveredbrinesalinity,vol,rate&ionanalysis•Productionresponse(IP,EUR,FluidsandchangesSPE140105 22/28/2011UsingAllTheDatatoHelpUnderstandTheFracBehavior.34GaryLash– SUNY,NewYork4SPE1401052/28/2011Tracers•ChemicalTracers–Whichzones–Longstability–flowtermstabilityIntermittent?–Extraneouswaterentry–Well‐towellinterference–Complexitydevelopment?•Gamma‐EmittingTracers,–Wherefracsinitiate&diddiversionwork?–TransverseorLongitudinal?– careful!–Frac‐to‐fracandwell‐to‐wellinterference–SecondaryFracinitiation?SPE140105 52/28/2011TabularForm–Whatdoesittellyou?ChemicalTracerSPE140105 62/28/2011SPE140105 72/28/2011FlowBackonSequentialFracsWhathappenedtostage7?Bitofamystery!2/28/2011 SPE140105 8CombinedTracersasaProductionLogShadedareainFigcenteriscontributionofeachstagetotheflowascalculatedfrommassbalance.Fluidtracerconc.inbackflowagainstvolprod(left)sideoffig‐est.comm.offracw/wellbore&howconnectionchangesovertimeproduced.orvolumeproducedRightsideoffigisamountoffluidtracerrecoveredfromhdeactracestageandisareflectionoftheamountoftracedloadfluidactuallyrecovered.2/28/2011 SPE140105 9ReactionofthefracreflectedinthedPumpingRecorSPE140105 102/28/2011SPE119896TracersEffectofincreasingcomplexityincreasingcomplexityAvgppb 15.7 3.9 9.0 11.7 10.1 8.0 10.2 3.4%lbfS8 2%2 1%4 7%6 1%5 3%4 2%5 3%5 3%2/28/2011 SPE140105 11%totalppbfromStage8.2%2.1%4.7%6.1%5.3%4.2%5.3%5.3%%totalppb@lastsample28.2% 8.6% 6.8% 24.5% 12.2% 4.9% 10.1% 2.4%Conclusions‐Microseismic•PotentialshapeandvolumeofSRV(stim latedme)(stimulatedrockvolu–Hydraulicconnection?–Faultlocation&actuationwarningHi hdlb k–ganowreaout–Fracclouddirection•Tracerconfirmscomplexityandfluidd isourcesurngrecoverySPE140105 122/28/2011PoorComplexity– TracerReturnedQuicklyTheTracershowedseveralcasesoftheperfsbeingoffdepthfromtheoriginal2/28/2011 SPE140105 13gdesign.T2HSpectraScanGamma‐EmitterTracers(TaggedSand)T2HSpectraScanSand)PROPPANTCOMMUNICATIONFROMT1HWELLConclusions•ChemicalTracersareaveryeffectivetrackingresourceidentifyingsourcesresourceforidentifyingsourcesoffluidsrecoveredoverperiodsof1iyearnsomecases.•Combiningmonitoringandtracingmethodsisapowerfultoolforunderstandingfracsnewarea.understandinginaSPE140105 152/28/2011
No. 54958.

#### Amcu Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 161681-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
33832.

#### HARRELL v. HARRELL.

Submitted July 14, 1978

Decided September 8, 1978.

Per curiam.

When the mother filed this suit for permanent custody, support, alimony, and attorney fees, a divorce court had already awarded temporary custody to the father and had granted a divorce on the pleadings, reversing these same other questions for later decision. Therefore, the trial court correctly dismissed the mother’s petition because the issues were already pending between the parties.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*126
      *Albert E. Butler,*for appellant.

*Robert B. Smith,*for appellee.
May 19, 1950

No. 54341.

Suit 4616.

#### The Sherwin-Williams Co. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1137 affirmed April 3, 1950. C. A. D. 432.
DSpace Repository

# Skeleltal Biology of Human Remains from La Tolita, Esmeraldas Province, Ecuador

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 
      - →
      - View Item

# Skeleltal Biology of Human Remains from La Tolita, Esmeraldas Province, Ecuador

Ubelaker, Douglas H.

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.41.1

Date:					1997

### Abstract:					

### Citation:					

*Skeleltal Biology of Human Remains from La Tolita, Esmeraldas Province, Ecuador**Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.41.1

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCtA-0041-Hi_res.pdf

Size:20.31Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0041-Lo_res.pdf

Size:3.767Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0041.epub

Size:18.46Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:ePub

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0041.mobi

Size:23.47Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:mobi

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology  [60]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                               U.S. REALTEL, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of U.S. RealTel, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the annual ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gregory P. McGraw, Acting Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Operating Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                       By: /s/ Gregory P. McGraw
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Gregory P. McGraw
                                           Acting Chief Executive Officer,
                                           President and Chief Operating
                                           Officer

March 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. RealTel, Inc. and will be
retained by U.S. RealTel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 62119.

#### Martin Brokerage Co. and J. E. Martin *v.*United States,

protests 231053-K, etc. (El Paso).

*620Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 557), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9383]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and 
Engineering (1173).
    Dates/Time: June 5, 2007, 8:30 a.m.--5:30 p.m. and June 6, 2007, 
8:30 a.m.--2 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
1235 S, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Margaret E.M. Tolbert, Senior Advisor and 
Executive Liaison, CEOSE, Office of Integrative Activities, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, 
Telephone: (703) 292-8040, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eb869f8487898e999fab85988dc58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95f8e1faf9f7f0e7e1d5fbe6f3bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the Executive Liaison at the above 
address.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning broadening participation in science and engineering.

Agenda

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

Welcome and Opening Statement by the CEOSE Chair Introductions

    Presentations and Discussions:
    <bullet> Understanding Interventions That Encourage Minorities 
to Pursue Research Careers
    <bullet> The Transformation of CEOSE
    <bullet> National Science Foundation Broader Impacts Criterion
    <bullet> Strategic Planning and Broadening Participation
    <bullet> CEOSE Status Reports
    [cir] Plans for a Minisymposium on Persons with Disabilities
    [cir] Conversations with Representatives of Ten Federal Agencies
    [cir] CEOSE 2006 Biennial Report to Congress
    [cir] Strategic Planning for CEOSE

Wednesday, June 6, 2007

Opening Statement by the New CEOSE Chair Presentations/Discussions:

    <bullet> Conversations with Selected NSF Assistant Directors
    <bullet> Discussion with the Director of the National Science 
Foundation
    <bullet> Reports by CEOSE Liaisons to National Science 
Foundation Advisory Committees
    <bullet> Deliberations on Key Areas of Focus in the Future, 
Recommendations, and Action Items
    Completion of Unfinished Business.

    Dated: May 11, 2007.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-9383 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
(Reap. Dec. 9440)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 16598; 17497.

(Decided June 2, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran DouT),*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the above-entitled appeals for reappraisement consists of plywood exported from Finland in the year 1955. Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for decision upon stipulation upon the basis of which I find that the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), as amended, of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such value in each instance was the appraised unit value, less 4 per centum, packed.

J udgment will issue accordingly.
The State of 

# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** August 11, 2015 N o. 04 - 15 - 00438 - CR and 04 - 15 - 00439 - CR Christopher J. PADILLA , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR4826B and 2013CR4827 Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER The court has examined the clerk’s records in Nos. 04 - 15 - 00438 - CR and 04 - 15 - 00439 - CR and is of the opinion that, in the interest of efficient administration, they should be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument. We, therefore, ORDER Nos. 04 - 15 - 00438 - CR and 04 - 15 - 00439 - CR consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument on appeal. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supple mentation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a single appeal. The court will dispose of the appeals with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate. This order does not extend the briefing schedu le.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of August, 2015 .

__________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court