alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9602]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5796]


Advisory Committee to the U.S. Section of the Inter-American 
Tropical Tuna Commission (Committee Renewal)

SUMMARY: The Department of State announces the renewal of the Charter 
for the Advisory Committee to the U.S. Section of the Inter-American 
Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) for an additional two years. The 
Advisory Committee to the U.S. Section of the IATTC may be terminated 
only by law. In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), a new Charter must be issued on a 
biennial basis from the date the current Charter was approved and filed 
with Congress and the Library of Congress.
    The IATTC was established pursuant to the Convention for the 
Establishment of an Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, signed in 
1949. The purpose of the IATTC is to conserve and manage the fisheries 
and associated resources of the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. The 
United States is represented to the IATTC by the U.S. Section, which 
includes four Presidentially-appointed Commissioners and a Department 
of State representative.
    The General Advisory Committee to the United States Section of the 
IATTC was established pursuant to Section 4 of the Tuna Conventions Act 
of 1950 (16 U.S.C. 953, as amended), the implementing statute for the 
IATTC Convention. The goal of the Advisory Committee is to serve the 
U.S. Section to the IATTC, including the Department of State, as 
advisors on matters relating to international conservation and 
management of stocks of tuna and dolphins in the eastern tropical 
Pacific Ocean, and in particular to provide recommendations on the 
development of U.S. policy associated with such matters.
    The Committee is composed of representatives of the major U.S. tuna 
harvesting, processing, and marketing sectors, as well as recreational 
fishing and environmental interests, formulating specific policy 
recommendations for the U.S. Section to the IATTC.
    The Advisory Committee will continue to follow the procedure 
prescribed by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Notice of 
meetings is published in the Federal Register in advance as required by 
FACA and meetings are open to the public unless a determination is made 
in accordance with Section l0 of the FACA that a meeting or a portion 
of the meeting should be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David F. Hogan, IATTC GAC Designated 
Federal Official, Office of Marine Conservation, Bureau of Oceans and 
International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, U.S. Department of 
State, Washington, DC 20520, Phone: 202-647-2335.

    Dated: March 23, 2007.
David A. Balton,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Fisheries, Department of 
State.
 [FR Doc. E7-9602 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John B. Zumwalt, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
| |  | ------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  |              |  | 
| |  | May 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN B. ZUMWALT, III                         
| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | John B. Zumwalt, III                                
| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Before the Second Division,

October 23, 1942

No. 47660.

#### Protests 990168-G, etc., of Irving L. Hartman Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the merchandise consists of knotted sisal hats the same as those involved in Abstract 46497 and of hats or hoods of ramie and cellophane the same as those involved in Abstract 47291, the claim that they are dutiable at only 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > "Older" Women as Office Workers

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*"Older" Women as Office Workers : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 248*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5521,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**EXHIBIT 10.24**

 

Description of Fiscal 2006 Incentive Bonus Plan 

 

Pursuant to the Fiscal 2006 Incentive Bonus Plan, certain employees and executive officers of the Company would be granted restricted stockunits based upon the achievement of certain financial milestones approved by the Board of Directors. The amount of restricted stock units awarded would constitute up to 70% of the base salary of the employee or executive officer. The restrictedstock unit awards would have a one year vesting period, which would be accelerated upon the achievement of additional financial milestones approved by the Board of Directors. The aggregate value of the restricted stock units that may be granted toexecutive officers pursuant to the Fiscal 2006 Incentive Bonus Plan is approximately $870,000.
August 6, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MILESTONE OPERATING, INC., AND DSTJ, L.L.P., Appellants

NO. 14-09-00765-CV V.

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of APPELLEE signed June 

1 2009, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record 

and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court 

below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with 

our Memorandum Opinion on Remand.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

APPELLEE.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Jones, McDuffee & Stratton Corp. *v.*United States

No. 6498.

Entry No. 3199/4.

Invoice dated Tunstall, Staffordshire, England, October 8, 1940.

Certified October 16, 1940.

Entered at Boston, Mass., November 19, 1940.

(Decided November 12, 1946)

*Benjamin A. Levett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the entered values. Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6764.

Entry No. 707978, etc.

Invoices dated Hawick, Scotland, August 1942, etc.

Certified August 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., September 30, 1942, etc.

(Decided January 14, 1947)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

The agreed set of facts, embodied in the stipulation of submission, establishes that export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)) is the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values of the articles in question are the appraised values, less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar cases.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Len Ksobiech state and attest that:

     (1) I am the acting Treasurer of OneSource Technologies, Inc. (the
"issuer").

     (2) Accompanying this certification is the Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2004, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by the issuer
with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which contains
financial statements.

     (3) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on my
knowledge:

          a. the quarterly report containing the financial statements fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
     Act, and

          b. the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the issuer for the periods presented therein.

/s/  Len Ksobiech
-----------------
Acting Treasurer

Date: May 13, 2004
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1705 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Spokane, 

Washington, as the ‘‘Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs 

Medical Center’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 13, 2011 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Ms. CANTWELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical 

Center in Spokane, Washington, as the ‘‘MannGrandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MANN-GRANDSTAFF DEPART4 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CEN5 TER. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Veterans Af7 fairs Medical Center in Spokane, Washington, shall after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act be known and desVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:09 Oct 14, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1705.IS S1705

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1705 IS

1 ignated as the ‘‘Mann-Grandstaff Department of Veterans 

2 Affairs Medical Center’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula4 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

5 States to the medical center referred to in subsection (a) 

6 shall be considered to be a reference to the Mann7 Grandstaff Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Cen8 ter. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
98-3208 (La. 4/23/99)

#### STATE ex rel. Ronald MILLER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 98-KH-3208.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Miller, Ronald; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writ; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “F” Number 360,113; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 98KW-2299

Denied.

KIMBALL, J. not on panel.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Coventry Health Care, Inc.; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 By:
    /s/ Allen F. WiseAllen F. WiseChief Executive Officer and Director
Date: March 12, 2010
No. 74-690.

#### Anonymous *v.*Kissinger, Secretary of State, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9469)

#### Robert C. Keck *v.*United States

Entry No. 8233, etc.

(Decided June 18, 1959)

*MaoLeish, Spray, Price <& Underwood*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule.upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise answering to the description of No. 351 Pedals, axle, and that such value is the invoiced unit values, net, less nondutiable charges as noted on the invoices.

The appeals having been abandoned as to all merchandise other than that described above, they are, to that extent, dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 74-849.

#### Garramone et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT23.1(b)CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-89333)pertaining to the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan and 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70290) pertaining to the 2000 Nonqualified Stock OptionPlan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-44306) pertaining to the Mainbrace 1998 StockOption Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-70210) pertaining to the Amended andRestated Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-85340) pertaining to theInfogation Corporation 1996 Stock Option Plan; Infogation Corporation 2001 Stock Option/StockIssuance Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-90848, as Amended) pertaining to theAmended and Restated Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-114104)pertaining to the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, as Amended, and the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-116279) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, asAmended, of BSQUARE Corporation of our report dated February 24, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheet of BSQUARE Corporation as of December 31, 2005, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows and schedules for eachof the two years in the period then ended, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPSeattle, Washington
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Civil engineers complete deployment readiness training 

By Staff Sgt. Brigette Waltermire137th Special Operations Wing

                MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE, Calif.  –              *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the National Guard website.*

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

civil engineeringConstructionequipmentConstruction & Equipment137th Special Operations Civil Engineering Squadronheavy equipment
**UNPUBLISHED**

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11-1913**

DEREK N. JARVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt . Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:10-cv-01540-RWT)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Grant Byrd, Jr., ALSTON & BYRD, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court ’ s order

gra nting summary judgment to Analytical Laboratory Services, Inc., in Jarvis’ employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. Analyti cal Lab. Servs. , No. 8:10

- cv - 01540

- RWT (D. Md. Aug. 22, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
No. 96-1247.

#### Richardson *v.*Bakery, Confectionary & Tobacco Workers, Local No. 26.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
(Reap. Dec. 9462)

#### W. T. Grant Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 711395; 728660-1/2; 738130.

(Decided June 15, 1959)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doiib,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise consists of sweaters exported from Japan during June and July 1957.

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market values or the prices, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States were the invoice unit prices plus the charges (except the charge for buying commission) as shown on the invoices.

> IT IS EURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise involved and that such values were the invoice unit prices, plus the charges (except the charge for buying commission) as shown on the invoices.

Judgment will issue accordingly.