alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
O0T-05T_ (^^?-3^^) 

Worlan •?i o-jr;:";=ORi7iiiON d Municipal Airport 

Worland, Wyoming .; 

ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE COMMENTS ' ' 

July 21, 2010 

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Mr. DeVany, 

i would like to start off by thanking you for the continued support of commercial air service in small 

communities. Without the Essential Air service, I fully believe there would not be an air carrier in 

Worland. With that, I wish to submit the following comments concerning the two (2) carriers that 

submitted proposals for subsidized EAS at Worland, Wyoming. 

As you know. Great Lakes Aviation is currently serving Worland with 12 flights a week to Denver, CO 

with a stop in either Laramie, WY or Cheyenne, WY. The main issue I have with Great Lakes is with their 

inconsistency. On average, twenty percent or more of the flights are late, cancelled or early. This 

causes an inconvenience to our citizens for the late and cancelled. For Airport personnel, late and 

cancelled increase the overtime for Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting standby required by FAA when 

we're not notified. Early flights put us in violation of our operating certificate when ARFF personnel are 

not at the airport for flight operations. 

I have talked with Jon Payne of Sovereign Air, Inc. on a couple of occasions. He states that if Sovereign 

Air, Inc was to be awarded the EAS contract for Worland/Laramie, they would move flight crew and 

maintenance personnel to Worland which would be good for our community. I have had several people 

state they do not want to go to a 9-passenger aircraft like the King Air 200. Mr. Payne did indicate they 

would upgrade to a 19-passenger plane hopefully within 6 months. 

I am also concerned about Sovereign Air, Inc. not having their operating certificates at this time. Also, it 

is my understanding they do not have gates at the terminal in Denver. 

At this time I am not please with the service we are receiving from Great Lakes Aviation, however, I am a 

little reluctant to put my support behind Sovereign Air, Inc. 

Kreg Lombard Gary J. Thompson 

Mayor Airport Manager 

City of Worland Worland Municipal Airport 

Worland, Wyoming Worland, Wyoming
Exhibit 32.1   Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated. Date: August 6, 2008/s/  Hugo Rodier
Hugo Rodier
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [AMS-FRL-8311-3] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice announcing an additional hearing and hearing locations. 

# SUMMARY:

EPA previously announced the opportunity for public hearing and written comment on the California Air Resources Board's request for a waiver of preemption for its Greenhouse Gas Emission (GHG) regulations for passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles beginning with the 2009 model year (MY). This previous announcement occurred on April 30, 2007 at 72 FR 21260. By this notice EPA is announcing the location of the May 22, 2007 hearing which commences at 9 a.m. EPA is also announcing an additional hearing, and location, for May 30, 2007 which will commence at 9 a.m. If you wish to present testimony at the May 22, 2007 hearing please follow the directions provided at 72 FR 21260. If you wish to present testimony at the May 30, 2007 hearing please follow the contact directions below. 

      ( print page 26627)    

# ADDRESSES:

The May 22, 2007 hearing will take place at the EPA Potomac Yard Conference Center, 2777 Crystal Drive—Room S-1204, Arlington, VA 22202. The May 30, 2007 hearing will take place at the Byron Sher Auditorium, Cal/EPA Headquarters, 1001 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you wish to present testimony at the Sacramento, CA hearing then provide notification by May 23, 2007 to David Dickinson, Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division (6405J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20460, e-mail address:                         *Dickinson.David@EPA.GOV.*

Dated: May 4, 2007. 

William L. Wehrum, 

Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation. 

 [FR Doc. E7-9025 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
No. 96-7800.

#### Tillman *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 55485.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 162107-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of ladies' blouses, wholly or in chief value of cotton, not knit or crocheted; that said blouses are not described in paragraph 1529; and that the cotton contained in said articles has a staple of less than one and one-eighth inches in length. Upon a consideration of the entire record the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### Reconnaissance of the geology and ground-water resources of the Horse Creek-Bear Creek area, Laramie and Goshen Counties, Wyoming

By: H. M. BabcockJohn Richard RappW. H. Durum

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir162

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Attachment

e. Chemical Structure Diagram



# [



# ]
<PAGE>


                                                                     Exhibit 4.1




OPUS360 CORPORATION
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
OP
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
CUSIP 68400F 10 9
COMMON STOCK
THIS CERTIFIES THAT
IS THE OWNER OF
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE,
OF
OPUS360 CORPORATION
transferable only on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney upon
surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.
This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the
Transfer
Agent and Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and signatures of its duly
authorized officers.
Dated:
SECRETARY
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
(New York, NY)
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
BY
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM-D
TEN ENT-D
JT TEN-D
as tenants in common
as tenants by the entireties
as joint tenants with right of
survivorship and not as tenants
in common
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-D......................Custodian......................
                                           (Cust)
(Minor)

                          under Uniform Gifts to Minors

Act........................................................
                                                                (State)
UNIF TRF MIN ACT-D.................Custodian (until age...........)
                                                (Cust)
                               .......................under Uniform Transfers
                                                  (Minor)

<PAGE>

                               to Minors Act.................................

(State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.
For value
received,
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
Shares
of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock represented by the within
Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
Attorney
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: The signature to this
assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the
certificate, in every particular, without alteration or
enlargement, or any change whatever.
SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:
THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN
AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR
DESTROYED, THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO
THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE.
Before the First Division,

November 28, 1945

No. 50710.

#### Protest 66847-K of North American Mercantile Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of dried, unsalted fish the same in all material respects as that passed upon in Abstract 50242. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained as claimed.
Before the Second Division,

January 23, 1941

No. 45246.

#### Protests 4604—K, etc., of Kreusser & Schad et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the records presented the protests were dismissed.
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 January 25, 2006 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-13318

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-80163-CR-DMM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

ANTHONY BOATWRIGHT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(January 25, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

David J. Joffe, appointed counsel for Anthony Boatwright, has filed a
2

motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the

appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Gordon’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Scott C. Mahan,
Senior Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. To my knowledge, this report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the
information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BSQUARE Corporation.



|                      |  |                                                                             
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2013 |  | /s/ Scott C. Mahan                                                          
|                      |  | Scott C. Mahan Senior Vice
President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1   SKINOVATION PHARMACEUTICAL INCORPORATED  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated.   Date: May 13, 2010/s/ Hugo Rodier
Hugo Rodier
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Food and Nutrition Service 

# AGENCY:

Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

The Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, published a document on July 17, 2006, announcing the national average value of donated foods or, where applicable, cash in lieu of donated foods, to be provided in school year 2007 (July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007) for each lunch served by schools participating in the National School Lunch Program (NSLP), and for each lunch and supper served by institutions participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). This document contained an error in the announced national average value of donated foods of 16.75 cents, which resulted from incorrect rounding of the index used to make the legislatively mandated annual adjustment in such value. The correct value is 17.00 cents. The correct per-meal value of donated food assistance has been provided to schools and institutions, and the correct per-meal value of cash or commodity letter of credit in lieu of such assistance will be provided to schools participating in CASH/CLOC sites. The correct per-meal value of cash in lieu of donated food assistance will also be provided to the State of Kansas for lunches served by schools participating in NSLP in that State, and to the appropriate States for lunches and suppers served by institutions in CACFP. 

## Correction 

In notice document E6-11214, published on July 17, 2006 at 71 FR 40470, make the following corrections: On page 40471, in the 1st column, in the 27th line under the heading “National Average Minimum Value of Donated Foods for the Period July 1, 2006 Through June 30, 2007,” change “16.75 cents” to “17.00 cents”. On page 40471, in the 2nd column, in the 3rd line, change “16.75 cents” to “17.00 cents”. On page 40471, in the 2nd column, in the 4th line, change “0.75 cents” to “0.50 cents”. 

Dated: May 7, 2007. 

George A. Braley, 

Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. 

[FR Doc. E7-9194 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00570-CR

EX PARTE RIGOBERTO TORRES FARIAS

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Rigoberto Torres Farias filed a pro se “Appellant‟s Notice of 

Appeal in Habeas Corpus” in which he mentioned code of criminal procedure 

article 11.07 and prayed that “his appeal in habeas corpus . . . be „granted‟ and 

without prejudice, as „justice may require‟ issue an order to the District Clerk to 

transmit a complete trial record to appellant to consider the unresolved claims to 

the legality of his conviction.” Farias has not provided us with any order from the 

trial court.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

On December 28, 2011, we notified Farias of our concern that we lack 

jurisdiction over this appeal and informed him that the appeal may be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed 

a response with the court by January 9, 2012, showing grounds for continuing 

the appeal. Farias filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing 

the appeal.

We generally have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal 

defendant only from a judgment of conviction. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. 

art. 44.02 (West 2006); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort 

Worth 1996, no pet.). We have no jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of 

habeas corpus in felony cases, including appeals involving requests for a free 

record to pursue a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. 

Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011); Peters v. State, No. 02-11-00230-CV, 

2011 WL 3672035, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 18, 2011) (mem. op., not 

designated for publication). We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 2, 2012
#### Jarnail DASS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73435.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 12, 2005.*

Decided Sept. 15, 2005.

George T. Heridis, Esq., Rai & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, OIL, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jarnail Dass, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings due to ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, *Socop-Gonzalez v. INS,*272 F.3d 1176, *8291187 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc), we deny the petition for review.

Equitable tolling of deadlines for motions to reopen applies “during periods when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence in discovering the deception, fraud, or error.” *Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir.2003). The sequence of events described in Dass’s affidavit supports the contention that “ignorance of the limitations period was caused by circumstances beyond his control,” *Socop-Gonzalez,*272 F.3d at 1193, until May 2003, the date Dass allegedly became aware that his appeal to the BIA had been unsuccessful.

Dass’s motion to reopen was not filed until March 2004, however, well beyond the 90-day filing period. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Dass has not satisfactorily explained this delay. *Cf. Iturribarria,*321 F.3d at 899 (noting petitioner’s prompt retention of new counsel and filing of a motion to reopen); *Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS,*282 F.3d 1218, 1225 (9th Cir.2002) (same). Nor has Dass demonstrated that he was unaware of the harm resulting from prior counsel’s alleged misconduct until December 2003. *Cf. Fajardo v. INS,*300 F.3d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.2002) (providing for equitable tolling where a petitioner is ignorant of the harm caused by counsel). We conclude, therefore, that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that Dass’s motion was untimely even if equitable tolling is applied.

We also reject Dass’s due process contention that he was denied a full and fair hearing. *See Torres-Aguilar v. INS,*246 F.3d 1267, 1270 (9th Cir.2001) (“A decision by the BIA or immigration judge violates due process if the proceeding was so fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented from reasonably presenting his case.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 7:03 AM 

To: Adams, Darryl 

Cc: Curry, Bridgid; Culligan, Kevin; Owens, Nicole; Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: Final -- RIN 2060-AR88 

Hi Darryl, 

I’ve also opened up 2060-AR88, the modified and reconstructed source, so the final proposed rule 

can be uploaded. 

Please let me know when both packages have been uploaded. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:12 PM 

To: Adams, Darryl 

Cc: Curry, Bridgid; Culligan, Kevin; Owens, Nicole; Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: Final -- RIN 2060-AR88 

Hi Darryl, 

Attached is the final draft of the proposed rule to upload for RIN 2060-AR88, when ROCIS is up 

again. 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

________________________________________________ 

Cortney Higgins, PhD 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov