alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Medina  Coffee,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the  three-month  period  ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Timothy P. Halter,  President and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 13, 2004

                                             By: /s/ Timothy P. Halter
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Timothy P. Halter, President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael L. Hirschey state and attest that:

     (1) I am the Chief Executive Officer of OneSource Technologies, Inc.
(the"issuer").

     (2) Accompanying this certification is the Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2004, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by the issuer
with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), which contains
financial statements.

     (3) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on my
knowledge:

          A. the periodic report containing the financial statements fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
     Act, and

          B. the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the issuer for the periods presented therein.


/s/ Michael L. Hirschey
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 13, 2004
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1413 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily increase the 

investment tax credit for geothermal energy property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2011 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily 

increase the investment tax credit for geothermal energy 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Geothermal Tax Parity 

5 Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN INVESTMENT TAX CRED7 IT FOR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY PROPERTY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subclause (II) of section 

9 48(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1413 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘paragraph (3)(A)(i)’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘clause (i) or (iii) of paragraph (3)(A)’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

October 12, 2011

Mr. Ali Mirzakhalili, Director 

Division of Air Quality

Delaware Department of Natural Resources

 and Environmental Control

89 Kings Highway

Dover, Delaware 19901

Dear Mr. Mirzakhalili:

On June 20, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the Delaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Delaware Department of Natural 

Resources and Environmental Control. The SIP revision pertains to a plan entitled “7 DE Admin 

Code 1124 – Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions.” The SIP revision amends 

Delaware regulations in order to implement reasonably available control technology (RACT) 

controls on emissions sources covered by EPA’s control techniques guidelines (CTG). EPA has 

determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to 

prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory 

Becoat, at (215) 814-2036, the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

 Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division 

 

cc: Honorable Collin P. O’Mara, Secretary, DNREC

 Mr. Ronald D. Amirikian, DNREC
1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Efren Vargas

- Hernandez , Petitioner,

v. Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. No. 21

- 1116 Agency No. A0 95

- 289

- 407

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 28, 2023 **

San Francisco, California Before: M. SMITH and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and RODRIGUEZ, ** * District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Xavier Rodriguez, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

APR 4 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Efren Vargas

- Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction u nder 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). As the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Vargas

- Hernandez’s petition
to reopen to seek protection under the Convention Agains t Torture on the basis that Vargas

- Hernandez had not established a prima facie case of eligibility for protection
because he established only a speculative fear that the kidnapping of his brother

- in

law would lead to his own torture by gangs in Mexico. See Garcia v. Wilkinson , 988 F.3d 1136, 1148 (9th Cir. 2021)

. We lack jurisdiction to review the a gency’s decision to deny reopening the case as to asylum and withholding relief because Vargas

- Hernandez did not challenge the IJ’s finding that his controlled s ubstance convictions are prima fac ie

“ particularly serious crimes” before the BIA and the issue is therefore unexhausted. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (holding that exhaustion is mandatory and jurisdictional under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1)).
PETITION DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part
.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 3, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-21049 Summary Calendar

DAVID LUKE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SERGEANT PARKER, Baytown Police Department; CARL WATERS, JR.; DR. JOSEPH PERAINO; DR. SEAL, Harris County Medical Supervisor; DEPUTY T. TORRIS; DEPUTY J.H. SHANNON; DEPUTY RONNIE BREWER; DEPUTY AL TRAPEANO; DEPUTY DAVIS; DEPUTY DOYLE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4-01-CV-2658

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * David Luke, Texas prisoner # 797148, moves for the appointment of counsel in his appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his civil rights suit. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite to theNo. 03-21049 -2- exercise of jurisdiction by this court. Dison v. Whitley , 20 F.3d 185, 186 (5th Cir. 1994). Because Luke did not file a timely notice of appeal, this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Id. ; F ED . R. A PP . P. 4(a)(1)(A). Luke’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Ainoa, David <david_ainoa@nps.gov> 

Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:46 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Servicing Kalaupapa,Hawaii 

I would like to show support for Makani Kai Air for their service to Kalaupapa, Hawaii. when we were held 

hostage with unbelievable air fares no one else showed an interest in helping the cornmuinty here at Kalaupapa 

but Makani Kai Air. 

Mahalo 

David Ainoa 

808-567-6126 work 

808-336-0528 eel 

david ainoa@nps.gov 

daveainoa@yahoo.com 

1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIMNAH K. RUDISILL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:01-cr-00048-MR-9)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 12, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timnah K. Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy 

Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill 

Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timnah K. Rudisill appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Emergency Motion for Dismissal and/or Immediate 

Release Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a 

Claim.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Rudisill, No. 1:01-cr-00048-

MR-9 (W.D.N.C. June 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 96-7755.

#### Davis *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT INCLUDED IN ITS THIRD QUARTER REPORT TO
SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      29,748,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              168,781,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,536,000)
<INVENTORY>                                171,757,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           389,224,000
<PP&E>                                     162,710,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (73,637,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             542,800,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      222,462,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   154,659,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 151,903,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               542,800,000
<SALES>                                    190,633,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           190,904,000
<CGS>                                      131,188,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              158,737,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,208,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             385,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,574,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,610,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,964,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,964,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Blue River Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Russell
Breeden III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     This certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed for any other purpose.


/s/ Russell Breeden, III
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
President
March 30, 2007


                                       104
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 377 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony commemorating the 60th Anniversary of the beginning of the integration of the 

United States Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2008 

Mr. SKELTON submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a 

ceremony commemorating the 60th Anniversary of the 

beginning of the integration of the United States Armed 

Forces. 

Whereas African-American men and women have served with 

distinction, courage, and honor in the United States 

Armed Forces throughout the history of the nation, even 

when they were denied the basic constitutional freedoms 

promised to all citizens; 

Whereas the practice of racial segregation and discrimination 

in the military prevented African-Americans from receiving the full recognition to which they were entitled as a 

result of their service; 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 377 IH 

Whereas African-Americans, in leading the effort to protest 

discriminatory treatment in the armed forces, paved the 

way for successful integration of women, Asians, Hispanics, and other ethnic minorities; 

Whereas the dedicated and heroic service of African-American 

men and women during World War II led to President 

Truman’s historic Executive Order 60 years ago that 

marked the beginning of racial integration in the United 

States Armed Forces; 

Whereas as a result of President Truman’s action, the United 

States Armed Forces has become one of the nation’s best 

examples of an institution committed to equality, opportunity, and advancement based on merit rather than 

race, religion, or ethnicity; and 

Whereas the heroic contributions of each member of the 

United States Armed Forces should be honored and celebrated: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR CEREMONY COMMEMO4 RATING 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF INTEGRA5 TION OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

6 (a) USE OF ROTUNDA.—The rotunda of the Capitol 

7 is authorized to be used on July 23, 2008, for a ceremony 

8 commemorating the 60th anniversary of President Tru9 man’s Executive Order 9981, which states, ‘‘It is hereby 

10 declared to be the policy of the President that there shall 

11 be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HCON 377 IH 

1 in the armed services without regard to race, color, reli2 gion or national origin.’’ 

3 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

4 ceremony referred to in subsection (a) shall be carried out 

5 in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the 

6 Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1210

CHALEDEEANNKA DOCUMENT PREPARER GOYENS;

O’LEVIA GOYENS; MALCOLM GOYENS; FREDDIE

GOYENS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

RESOURCES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-99-196-4-H)

Submitted: November 14, 2000 Decided: November 22, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chaledeeannka Document Preparer Goyens, Appellant Pro Se. Claud

Robert Whitener, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Chaledeeannka Goyens appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for failure to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Goyens v. North

Carolina Dep’t of Health & Human Res., No. CA-99-196-4-H (E.D.N.C.

Jan. 28, 2000). We deny the parties’ motions to expedite the

appeal, and we deny Goyens’ “motion for release pending of records.” We deny Goyens’ motion for oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE CHRISTOPH GESKES

______________________ 

2012-1390

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 

7791173. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

 MARK B. HARRISON, Venable, LLP, of Washington, DC, 

for appellant. With him on the brief was MICHAEL E.

HALL. 

 RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, for appellee. 

With him on the brief were THOMAS L. CASAGRANDE and 

CHRISTINA J. HIEBER, Associate Solicitors. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit 

Judges).
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 

March 19, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
No. 55446.

#### George W. Tobin *v.*United States,

protest 151538-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers in the case disclosing no reason to disturb the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT INCLUDED IN ITS FIRST QUARTER REPORT TO
SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,897,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               95,226,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,172,000
<INVENTORY>                                105,087,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           218,540,000
<PP&E>                                     109,546,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              56,497,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             332,891,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       88,310,000
<BONDS>                                     29,259,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   144,549,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,994,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               332,891,000
<SALES>                                    100,984,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,071,000
<CGS>                                       66,372,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               84,506,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,024,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,035,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,506,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,122,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,384,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
No. 74-5905.

#### Mitchell *v.*Alabama.

Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, including Amendment
Number 1 on Form 10-Q/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eugene D. Greutman, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Eugene D. Greutman
----------------------
Eugene D. Greutman
Chief Financial Officer
December 12, 2002