# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17

- 1996 V (not to be published)

MARYLOU PORZIO

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: March 3, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , for

P etitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY ’ S FEES AND COSTS 1

On December 21, 2017 , Marylou Porzio filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration , resulting from the adverse effects of an influenza vaccine she received on January 5, 2017

. ( Petition at 1 )

. On July 31, 2020

, a decision was issued awarding
compensation to P etitioner based on the parties’ stipulation

. (ECF No. 52 )

.

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pert inent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated February 16,

2021 (ECF No. 57 ) , requesting a total award of $ 38,716.52 (representing $ 37,620.60 in
fees and $ 1,095.92 in costs). In accordance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner filed a
signed statement indicating that she not incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses. ( Id. at 2).
Respondent reacted to the motion on February 25, 2021

, indicating that he is satisfied
that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this

case a nd defers to the Court’s discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. (ECF
No. 58). On February 26, 2021

, P etitioner filed a reply requesting attorney fees and costs

be awarded in full

. (ECF No. 59 )

.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my experience , the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. Section
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney ’ s fees and costs. I

award a total of $ 38,716.52 (representing $ 37,620.60 in fees and $ 1,095.92 in costs) as
a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel

. In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the
Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this dec ision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.