Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 18453 

environmental justice-related issues as 

required by Executive Order 12898, 

Federal Actions To Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

The Congressional Review Act (CRA), 

5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), 

generally provides that before a rule 

may take effect, the agency 

determination promulgating the rule 

must submit a rule report, which 

includes a copy of the rule, to each 

House of the Congress and to the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States. Section 808 allows the issuing 

agency to make a rule effective sooner 

than otherwise provided by the CRA if 

the agency makes a good cause finding 

that notice and public procedure is 

impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest. This 

determination must be supported by a 

brief statement, 5 U.S.C. 808(2). As 

stated previously, the EPA has made 

such a good cause finding, including the 

reasons, and therefore established an 

effective date of April 2, 2014. The EPA 

will submit a report containing this final 

action and other required information to 

the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of this action in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major’’ 

rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This 

action will be effective April 2, 2014. 

This technical amendment does not 

have substantial direct effects on the 

states, or on the relationship between 

the national government and the states, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132, Federalism (64 

FR 43255, August 10, 1999). 

This technical amendment is not 

subject to Executive Order 13211, 

Actions Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001) because this action is not a 

significant regulatory action under 

Executive Order 12866. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 51 

Air pollution control, Environmental 

protection, Performance specifications, 

and Test methods and procedures. 

Dated: March 24, 2014. 

Janet G. McCabe, 

Acting Assistant Administrator. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 51—REQUIREMENTS FOR 

PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND 

SUBMITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION 

PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 51 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. 

■ 2. Amend appendix M to part 51 

under 11.0 Analytical Procedures by 

revising paragraph 11.2.1 and adding 

paragraphs 11.2.1.1 and 11.2.1.2 to read 

as follows: 

Appendix M to Part 51—Recommended 

Test Methods for State Implementation 

Plans 

* * * * * 

11.2.1 Container #3, CPM Filter Sample. 

If the sample was collected by Method 17 or 

Method 201A with a stack temperature below 

30 °C (85 °F), transfer the filter and any loose 

PM from the sample container to a tared glass 

weighing dish. (See Section 3.0 for a 

definition of constant weight.) Desiccate the 

sample for 24 hours in a desiccator 

containing anhydrous calcium sulfate. Weigh 

to a constant weight and report the results to 

the nearest 0.1 mg. [Note: In-stack filter 

samples collected at 30 °C (85 °F) may 

include both filterable insoluble particulate 

and condensable particulate. The nozzle and 

front half wash and filter collected at or 

below 30 °C (85 °F) may not be heated and 

must be maintained at or below 30 °C 

(85 °F).] If the sample was collected by 

Method 202, extract the CPM filter as 

follows: 

11.2.1.1 Extract the water soluble 

(aqueous or inorganic) CPM from the CPM 

filter by folding the filter in quarters and 

placing it into a 50-ml extraction tube. Add 

sufficient deionized, ultra-filtered water to 

cover the filter (e.g., 10 ml of water). Place 

the extractor tube into a sonication bath and 

extract the water-soluble material for a 

minimum of two minutes. Combine the 

aqueous extract with the contents of 

Container #1. Repeat this extraction step 

twice for a total of three extractions. 

11.2.1.2 Extract the organic soluble CPM 

from the CPM filter by adding sufficient 

hexane to cover the filter (e.g., 10 ml of 

hexane). Place the extractor tube into a 

sonication bath and extract the organic 

soluble material for a minimum of two 

minutes. Combine the organic extract with 

the contents of Container #2. Repeat this 

extraction step twice for a total of three 

extractions. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–07238 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0285; FRL–9909–01– 

Region–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Tennessee; 

Conflict of Interest 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is finalizing two actions 

pertaining to the Clean Air Act (CAA or 

Act) State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

requirements for the State of Tennessee. 

First, EPA is approving the SIP revision 

submitted by Tennessee, through the 

Tennessee Department of Environment 

and Conservation (TDEC) on October 9, 

2013, as meeting the applicable 

requirements of the Act. This SIP 

revision addresses Tennessee’s 

outstanding obligations related to the 

CAA State board and conflict of interest 

requirements. Second, EPA is fully 

approving the infrastructure SIP subelement related to the State board and 

conflict of interest requirements for the 

2008 Lead National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS), 1997 

Annual Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 

NAAQS, 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS 

and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA 

notes that all other applicable 

Tennessee infrastructure SIP elements 

for the 2008 Lead, 1997 annual PM2.5, 

2006 24-hour PM2.5, and 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS have been addressed in 

separate rulemakings. 

DATES: This rule is effective on May 2, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2012–0285. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Regulatory Development Section, 

Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
18454 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

1The section 128(a)(2) conflict of interest 

disclosure requirements, however, were met by 

existing provisions in the Tennessee SIP. See 77 FR 

42997, 42998; 77 FR 45958, 45960; and 78 FR 

36440, 36442. 

2EPA’s initial final action to conditionally 

approve sub-element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) occurred on 

July 23, 2012. Therefore, Tennessee’s commitment 

to submit the specific enforceable measures 

necessary to comply with section 128(a)(1) 

requirements was due no later than July 23, 2013. 

See 77 FR 42997. 

3The proposed approval of the infrastructure SIP 

sub-element for these NAAQS was contingent upon 

EPA fully approving the TDEC October 9, 2013, 

revision to address the requirements of CAA section 

128(a)(1). 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Lakeman, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9043. 

Mr. Lakeman can be reached via 

electronic mail at lakeman.sean@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

By statute, SIPs meeting the 

requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and 

(2) of the CAA are to be submitted by 

states within three years after 

promulgation of a new or revised 

NAAQS. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) 

require states to address basic SIP 

requirements, including emissions 

inventories, monitoring, and modeling 

to assure attainment and maintenance of 

the NAAQS. 

More specifically, section 110(a)(1) 

provides the procedural and timing 

requirements for SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) 

lists specific elements that states must 

meet for ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP 

requirements related to a newly 

established or revised NAAQS. As 

mentioned above, these requirements 

include SIP infrastructure elements 

such as modeling, monitoring, and 

emissions inventories that are designed 

to assure attainment and maintenance of 

the NAAQS. On July 23, 2012 (77 FR 

42997), August 2, 2012 (77 FR 45958), 

and June 18, 2013 (78 FR 36440), EPA 

approved in part, and conditionally 

approved in part, Tennessee’s 

infrastructure SIPs for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS, 1997 annual PM2.5

NAAQS, 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS 

and 2008 Lead NAAQS, respectively. 

Specifically, EPA conditionally 

approved the portion of section 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) (hereafter ‘‘sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii)’’) respecting the Act’s 

section 128(a)(1) requirements for each 

of the above NAAQS. Sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) provides that each 

infrastructure SIP shall provide 

requirements ‘‘that the State comply 

with the requirements respecting State 

boards under section [128 of the CAA]. 

. . .’’ Section 128, in turn, provides that 

each SIP shall contain requirements 

that: (1) Any board or body which 

approves permits or enforcement orders 

under the CAA shall have at least a 

majority of members who represent the 

public interest and do not derive a 

significant portion of their income from 

persons subject to permits or 

enforcement orders under the Act 

(hereafter ‘‘section 128(a)(1) 

requirements’’); and, (2) any potential 

conflicts of interest by members of such 

board or body or the head of an 

executive agency with similar powers be 

adequately disclosed (hereafter ‘‘section 

128(a)(2) requirements.’’) EPA was 

unable to fully-approve Tennessee’s 

infrastructure submissions for the above 

NAAQS with respect to sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) because, at the time, the 

SIP did not include provisions to 

address the section 128(a)(1) 

requirements.1

On March 28, 2012, TDEC transmitted 

a letter to EPA, committing to adopt 

specific enforceable measures into its 

SIP by July 23, 2013, to address section 

128(a)(1). This commitment provided a 

basis for EPA to exercise the conditional 

approval authority provided at section 

110(k)(4) of the CAA. Consistent with 

this authority, Tennessee was required 

to adopt the specified enforceable 

provisions and submit a revision to EPA 

for approval by July 23, 2013 (one year 

following the conditional approval 

action).2 As described at section 

110(k)(4), and as noted by EPA in its 

conditional approval actions, failure by 

the State to adopt the specified 

provisions and submit them to EPA for 

incorporation into the SIP by July 23, 

2013, would result in the conditional 

approvals automatically converting to 

disapprovals. Tennessee failed to meet 

the July 23, 2013, commitment deadline, 

and instead, submitted the section 

128(a)(1) revisions to EPA on October 9, 

2013. As a result, the sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) conditional approvals 

automatically converted to disapprovals 

on July 23, 2013. 

On January 9, 2014, EPA provided 

notice of the conversion of the section 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) conditional approvals to 

disapprovals. 79 FR 1608. In the same 

action, EPA also proposed to approve 

TDEC’s October 9, 2013 SIP revision as 

being sufficient to address Tennessee’s 

outstanding obligations related to the 

CAA section 128(a)(1) requirements. In 

addition, EPA also proposed through 

the January 9, 2014, action to approve 

infrastructure SIP sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) related to the State board 

and conflict of interest requirements for 

the 2008 Lead, 1997 annual PM2.5, 2006 

24-hour PM2.5, and 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS.3 EPA received no comments 

on these proposed actions. 

II. Tennessee’s State Board and Conflict 

of Interest Submission 

TDEC’s October 9, 2013, SIP revision 

revises the content Chapter 1200–3–17 

and moves it to a new chapter: Chapter 

0400–30–17 Conflict of Interest. Chapter 

1200–3–17 is reserved for future use. 

The revision further adds new sections 

0400–30–17–.02 Protecting the Public 

Interests and 0400–30–17–.05 Policy of 

Ethics and the Avoidance of Conflicts of 

Interest. EPA is approving this revision 

because the Agency has determined 

that, once approved into the Tennessee 

SIP, this change will address the section 

128(a)(1) requirements that any board or 

body which approves permits or 

enforcement orders under the CAA have 

at least a majority of members who 

represent the public interest and not 

derive a significant portion of their 

income from persons subject to permits 

or enforcement orders under the Act. 

Specifically, TDEC’s revision 

incorporates a new rule into its SIP to 

address section 128(a)(1) requirements. 

Rule 0400–30–17–.02 Protecting the 

Public Interests contains definitions and 

requirements that will enable the 

Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board 

(hereafter the ‘‘Board’’) to clearly 

determine if it has a majority of 

members who represent the public 

interest and do not derive a significant 

portion of their income from persons 

subject to permits or enforcement orders 

under the Act. The intent of rule 0400– 

30–17–.02 is to ensure that at least half 

of the Board serves in the public interest 

and does not derive any significant 

income from persons subject to permits 

or enforcement orders under the Act. 

Pursuant to these provisions, in the 

event the Board is unable to determine 

that it is comprised consistent with the 

requirements of section 128(a)(1), the 

revisions prevent the Board from 

hearing contested cases until such time 

as it complies with the requirements of 

section 128. 

TDEC is also revising sections 0400– 

30–17–.01 Purpose and Intent (formally 

1200–3–17–.01), 0400–30–17–.03 

Conflict of Interest on the Part of the 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 18455 

4As previously noted, the section 128(a)(2) 

conflict of interest disclosure requirements, were 

met by existing provisions in the Tennessee SIP. 

See 77 FR 42997, 42998; 77 FR 45958, 45960; and 

78 FR 36440, 36442. 

Board and Technical Secretary 

(formally 1200–3–17–.02) and 0400–30– 

17–.04 Conflict of Interest in the 

Permitting of Municipal Solid Waste 

Incineration Units (formally 1200–3– 

17–.03) of the SIP. EPA has determined 

that these revisions, are sufficient to 

meet the State’s obligations pursuant to 

the requirements of CAA section 

128(a)(1). 

III. Tennessee’s Infrastructure SIP 

Submission 

Sub-element 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) requires 

compliance with the requirements 

respecting State boards and conflicts of 

interest pursuant to section 128 of the 

Act. EPA reviews infrastructure SIP subelement 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) submissions to 

ensure that the SIP includes provisions 

satisfying section 128 requirements. 

Today’s final approval of the October 9, 

2013, SIP revision to address section 

128(a)(1) requirements results in the 

Tennessee SIP fully meeting the 

applicable section 128 requirements.4

Accordingly, EPA is also hereby 

finalizing approval of sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) with respect to the 

applicable section 128(a)(1) 

requirements for the 2008 Lead NAAQS, 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, 2006 24- 

hour PM2.5 NAAQS and 1997 8- hour 

ozone NAAQS. 

IV. Final Action 

EPA is approving the SIP revision 

submitted by TDEC on October 9, 2013, 

as meeting the applicable requirements 

of section 128(a)(1) the Act. 

Additionally, EPA is fully approving the 

infrastructure SIP sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii) related to the State board 

and conflict of interest requirements for 

the 2008 Lead NAAQS, 1997 Annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS, 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS and 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. These actions are being taken 

pursuant to section 110 of the CAA. 

EPA notes that the subject of this 

notice is limited to the section 128(a)(1) 

requirements and the associated 

infrastructure SIP sub-element 

110(a)(2)(E)(ii). All other applicable 

Tennessee infrastructure SIP elements 

for the 2008 Lead NAAQS, 1997 annual 

PM2.5 NAAQS, 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 

have been addressed in separate 

rulemakings. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this action does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by June 2, 2014. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. See section 

307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate Matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: March 21, 2014. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, 40 CFR part 52, is to be 

amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart RR—Tennessee 

§ 52.2219 [Removed and Reserved] 

■ 2. Section 52.2219 is removed and 

reserved. 

■ 3. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by: 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
18456 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

■ a. Removing the entry in Table 1 for 

‘‘CHAPTER 1200–3–17 CONFLICT OF 

INTEREST’’ in its entirety; and 

■ b. Adding in numerical order a new 

entry in Table 1 for ‘‘CHAPTER 0400– 

30–17 CONFLICT OF INTEREST’’. 

The addition reads as follows: 

§ 52.2220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

TABLE 1—EPA APPROVED TENNESSEE REGULATIONS

State citation Title/subject State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

CHAPTER 0400–03–17 CONFLICT OF INTEREST 

Section 0400–30–17–.01 ........ Purpose and Intent ................ 9/23/2013 4/2/2014 [Insert citation of 

publication].

Section 0400–30–17–.02 ........ Protecting the Public Interests 9/23/2013 4/2/2014 [Insert citation of 

publication].

Section 0400–30–17–.03 ........ Conflict of Interest on the Part 

of the Board and Technical 

Secretary.

9/23/2013 4/2/2014 [Insert citation of 

publication].

Section 0400–30–17–.04 ........ Conflict of Interest in the Permitting of Municipal Solid 

Waste Incineration Units.

9/23/2013 4/2/2014 [Insert citation of 

publication].

Section 0400–30–17–.05 ........ Policy of Ethics and the 

Avoidance of Conflicts of 

Interest.

9/23/2013 4/2/2014 [Insert citation of 

publication].

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–07240 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0056; FRL–9907–62] 

Clomazone; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of clomazone in 

or on multiple commodities which are 

identified and discussed later in this 

document. In addition, this regulation 

removes an existing tolerance on 

‘‘cabbage’’ that is superseded by this 

action. The Interregional Research 

Project Number 4 (IR–4) requested these 

tolerances under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective April 

2, 2014. Objections and requests for 

hearings must be received on or before 

June 2, 2014, and must be filed in 

accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0056, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West 

Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The 

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

telephone number for the Public 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois 

Rossi, Registration Division (7505P), 

Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR 

site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40tab_02.tpl. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2013–0056 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before June 2, 2014. Addresses for mail 

and hand delivery of objections and 

hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 

178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES