alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(V. D. 74)

#### S. E. Laszlo *v.*United States

Entry No. 775509.

(Decided April 9, 1958)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in S. *E. Laszlo*v. *United States,*39 Cust. Ct. 390, Abstract 61109, and it has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise consists of instruments and cases which were held by the Court in Abstract 61109 to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of article.

> 2. That the market value or the price of the instruments and cases herein at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges *635and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was as set forth below.

> Entry Instru-

> Number Item ■ ment Case Total

> 775509 K K K ASTER_ 19. 00 2. 60 21. 60

> 3. That there was no higher foreign value.

> 4. That the instant ease may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instruments and cases in question, and I hold such statutory value for this merchandise to be as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 9611)

#### Cohen & Mann *v.*United States

Entry No. 894268.

(Decided February 25, 1960)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

*581Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a reap-praisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.

An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.

I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Cumulative Effects

This project treats a very small percentage of the watersheds in which it is proposed to occur. For the Ruth 

Lake-Mad River watershed, the ERA model indicates that the existing condition is 8.8 percent; this 

project would add 0.4 percent for a total of 9.2 percent. The Threshold of Concern (TOC) is by 

compartment, which Ruth Lake-Mad River has four, and varies from 10 percent to 14.3 percent. There are 

no foreseeable future projects. This project would not lead to cumulative watershed effects in the Ruth 

Lake-Mad River watershed.

For the Barry Creek-Mad River watershed, the ERA model indicates that the existing condition is 5.5 

percent; this project would add 0.4 percent for a total of 6.2 percent. This watershed does have foreseeable 

future actions (primarily remaining units from the Beaverslide and Kelsey Peak timber sales). Assuming 

that all the remaining units are treated in 2018, the ERA would increase to 6.1 percent. The TOC for Barry 

Creek-Mad River ranges from 13.4 to 14.9, so this watershed would remain well under threshold. This 

project would not lead to cumulative watershed effects in the Barry Creek-Mad River watershed.

The entire Mad River watershed is listed as impaired due to excess sediment and temperature under 

Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. Due to limited project activities in riparian reserves and 60-plus 

percent canopy outside of riparian reserves, stream temperature would not be affected. Some small 

amount of sediment may be generated by road maintenance and decommissioning activities during 

project implementation, but these activities are expected to reduce sediment production in the long term.
Exhibit
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Wade D. Miquelon,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/  Wade D.
Miquelon


Wade D.
Miquelon


Chief
Financial Officer


Dated:  March
26, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Walgreen Co. and will be retained by Walgreen Co. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 53182.

#### L. L. Littlejohn et al. *v.*United States,

protests 969734-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Skibski, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ John L.
Skibski





John L.
Skibski


Chief
Financial Officer


November
15, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MBT Financial Corp. and will be retained by MBT Financial Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(Reap. Dec. 9829)

#### Jaguar Cars, Inc. Dorf International, Ltd. v. United States

Entry No. 763670, etc.

(Decided November 2, 1960)

Plaintiffs not represented by counsel.

*George CocJiran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The records indicate that there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiffs when the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached to and made part of this decision were called for hearing, and the cases were consequently ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> Tbe submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to tbe court, or by tbe court on its own motion. Where tbe plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or bis attorney, in a case does not appear when tbe same is called, and after tbe opposite party has bad opportunity to present evidence on tbe issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by tbe court on tbe record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the records in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT BRYAN GERARD AND WILBERT GERARD VERSUS RANDOM BEAUX, LLC NO. 2022 CW 1299 

### FEBRUARY 1, 2023 In Re: East Baton Rouge Parish Housing Authority, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 698631. BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE AND MILLER, JJ. WRIT DENIED

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT JMG EW SMM
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc.; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   /s/ Kevin M. Goodwin                                        |
|   | Kevin M. Goodwin                                                   |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
No. 48790.

#### Protests 835056-G, etc., of Otto Roth & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and cited cases the following allowances were made by the court to compensate for foreign substances on the outside of certain cheese: (1) *21⁄2*percent for cheese similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 48269, and (2) 1 percent for other cheese similar to Reggiano cheese the subject of said C. D. 706. Protests sustained to this extent.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 26, 2012

t0319 

# Order

March 26, 2012

144167

FANNIE MAE, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144167 COA: 305684 Wayne CC: 11-005202-AV HOMER YOPP, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 42039.

#### Protests 928204-G, etc., of Selsi Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) aneroid barometers similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *Oppleman*(25 C. C. P. A. 168, T. D. 49271) at 27% percent under paragraph 372; (2) hair hygrometers like those the subject of *Selsi*v. *United States*(C. D. 160) at 27% percent under paragraph 372; (3) thermometers similar to those the subject of Abstract 39852 at 40 percent under paragraph 339; and (4) weather sets as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339, *Dow*v. *United States*(21 C. C. P. A. 282, T. D. 46816) cited.
(V. D. 78)

#### Hensel Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 80281.

(Decided May 22, 1958)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran*Doub,“Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

This is a valuation proceeding which arose by reason of a judgment rendered by the second division of this court in *Gramercy Import Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*38 Cust. Ct. 481, Abstract 60689.

The cause of action, having been formally abandoned, is dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Before the First Division,

May 15, 1951

No. 55540.

#### Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 130706-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cedilanid substance, ergotomin tartrate, and digilanid and scillaren substance the same in all material respects as the commodity passed upon in *Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 115, C. D. 1273), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Daniel Myers,  the Registrant's  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of  Carsunlimited.com,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
small  business  issuer as of, and for, the periods  presented in this quarterly
report;

4. As the  sole  certifying  officer,  I am  responsible  for  establishing  and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small  business  issuer and I have:  a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material  information relating
to the small business issuer, including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made
known to me by others within those entities,  particularly  during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the small  business  issuer's  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of a date
within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of  this  quarterly  report  (the
"Evaluation  Date");  and c) presented in this  quarterly  report my conclusions
about the  effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on my
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the sole certifying  officer,  I have  disclosed,  based on my most recent
evaluation,  to the small business  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal  controls which could adversely  affect the small business  issuer's
ability  to  record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data and have
identified for the small business issuer's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
internal  controls;  and b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that involves
management or other employees who have a significant  role in the small business
issuer's internal controls; and

6. As the sole  certifying  officer,  I have indicated in this quarterly  report
whether or not there were significant  changes in internal  controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of my most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 22, 2005


/s/ Daniel Myers
-----------------------
Daniel Myers
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer


                                       19
Exhibit 32.1   Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation
Pharmaceutical Incorporated certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of  Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated. Date: May 13, 2008
/ s/John W. Peters
John W. Peters
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Denise Burton, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Office of the Chief Science Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone 404-639-4641. 

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: April 27, 2007. 

Elaine L. Baker, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E7-8562 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
(Reap. Dec. 8425)

Entry No. 711633.

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided April 28, 1955)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LawreNCe, Judge:

This appeal for a reappraisement presents the question of the proper value of a shaping machine imported from West Germany.

The parties hereto have submitted the appeal for decision upon the following stipulation—

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise involved in this appeal to reappraisement is one Klapp Shaping Machine, Model No. 525.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price of the basic machine, without accessories at the time of exportation *491of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States was D. M. 6050 and that there was no higher export value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appraised value of the accessories represents the proper dutiable value of such accessories.

> íjí ‡ *%** * ‡ *

Upon the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the basic shaping machine in issue, and that said value is DM 6050. I further find that' the appraised value of the accessories for said shaping machine represents the proper dutiable value of such accessories.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard LaBarbera, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: May 10, 2007

|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|/s/ Richard LaBarbera                                                                
|Richard LaBarbera President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)