alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

September 23, 1943

No. 48801.

#### Petition 6383-R of Rotaprint Machines, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It appeared from the record that the importer had been purchasing certain duplicating machines imported from Germany through the foreign manufacturer’s general American agent located in Cleveland, Ohio. Later the petitioner entered into an agreement with the manufacturer wherein the petitioner became exclusive agent of the manufacturer for the sale and distribution of these machines in certain eastern states. After counsel received information from Germany he advised the petitioner to enter at the invoice value, which was the contract price and the price the petitioner paid for the machines. It appeared that the invoice value was the export value, as defined in section 402. The appraiser advanced the value to what was claimed to be the foreign value, which apparently was the retail sales price of this merchandise in Germany. The petitioner filed an appeal to reappraisement (Reap. Dec. 5669 and 5848), wherein the value found by the appraiser was upheld. It was found that the -entire course of conduct of the petitioner was consistent with the desire to ascertain the correct dutiable value, and the evidence clearly showed an honest difference of opinion, and that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that on final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 54304.

#### Michael J. Haile, Jr. *v.*United States,

protest 151068-K (Galveston).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, counsel for the Government moved in evidence the collector's answer to the protest. A letter from the plaintiff, dated November 10, 1948, disclosed that the Civil Aeronautics Administration regional office shipped the involved crystals, an American product, to its Balboa station, and that they were returned to the Airways Facilities Shop for repair and return to said Balboa station. In the collector’s answer to the protest, he stated that had said letter of November 10, 1948, been a part of the record at the time of liquida*451tion, a waiver of the certificate of exportation would have been granted, and favorable action on the protest was recommended. In view of the evidence before the court, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### Feasibility of ground-water features of the alternate plan for the Mountain Home project, Idaho

By: Raymond L. NaceS. W. WestR.W. Mowder

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1376

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwestern Region, Arizona, New Mexico, West Texas and 
Oklahoma: Proposed Surface Management of Natural Gas Resource 
Development on Jicarilla Ranger District, Carson National Forest, Rio 
Arriba County, NM; Additional Filings

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service published a Notice of Intent (69 FR 
59881-59883, October 6, 2004) to prepare an environmental impact 
statement for a proposed forest plan amendment for surface management 
of gas leasing and development on the Jicarilla Ranger District, Carson 
National Forest. In addition, the proposal includes a leasing analysis 
for approximately 3,800 unleased acres on the Jicarilla Ranger 
District.
    A draft environmental impact statement has been completed and the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a Notice of 
Availability (NOA) in the Federal Register on February 16, 2007 (72 FR 
54900). The end of the comment period presented in the NOA was 
incorrect and subsequently rectified in an amended notice (72 FR 9521, 
March 2, 2007).

CORRECTED DATES: The Notice of Intent (NOI) stated the final 
environmental impact statement (FEIS) was scheduled for completion in 
early summer of 2005. This Notice corrects the estimated filing date of 
the FEIS from early summer 2005, to the fall 2007. When completed, EPA 
will publish a NOA of the FEIS in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Kuykendall, Forest 
Environmental Coordinator, Carson National Forest, at (505) 758-6212.

    Dated: May 15, 2007.
Martin D. Chavez, Jr.,
Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest.
 [FR Doc. E7-9271 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Exhibit
32.1








Certification








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63


of
Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350),
the undersigned officer of SonomaWest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Dated:
February 12, 2010











/s/ Walker R.
Stapleton


Walker R.
Stapleton,


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by SonomaWest Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Grant of Extension of Time PAGE 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20 - 007 6 IN THE MATTER OF L . T , Youth in Need of Care.

**GRANT OF EXTENS ION OF TIME**  Upon consideration of the Appellant ’s Motion for Extension of T ime, and good cause appearing therefore, the Appellant is granted an extension of time until May 16 , 2020 , to prepare, serve, and file the Opening Brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 20 2020

03/20/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0076
Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District 

JUNE 8, 2015 

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b). 

1. Case No. SD33593 

 Re: FARON R. COLLINS, 

 Movant-Appellant, 

 v. 

 STATE OF MISSOURI, 

 Respondent-Respondent.
#### Terry SHIPMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-1000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 9, 1998.

Terry Shipman, Appellant, pro se.

Robert Butterworth, Attorney General, and L. Michael Billmeier, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Shipman v. State,*699 So.2d 1379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

BARFIELD, C.J., DAVIS, J., and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B„ Senior Judge, concur.
II 

Calendar No. 93 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1323 

To express the sense of the Senate on shared sacrifice in resolving the 

budget deficit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 30, 2011 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and ordered to 

be placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To express the sense of the Senate on shared sacrifice in 

resolving the budget deficit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON SHARED SACRIFICE. 

4 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find5 ings: 

6 (1) The Wall Street Journal reports that me7 dian pay for chief financial officers of S&P 500 com8 panies increased 19 percent to $2,900,000 last year. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1323 PCS

1 (2) Over the past 10 years, the median family 

2 income has declined by more than $2,500. 

3 (3) Twenty percent of all income earned in the 

4 United States is earned by the top 1 percent of indi5 viduals. 

6 (4) Over the past quarter century, four-fifths of 

7 the income gains accrued to the top 1 percent of in8 dividuals. 

9 (b) SENSE OF THE SENATE.—It is the sense of the 

10 Senate that any agreement to reduce the budget deficit 

11 should require that those earning $1,000,000 or more per 

12 year make a more meaningful contribution to the deficit 

13 reduction effort. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 93 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1323 

A BILL 

To express the sense of the Senate on shared 

sacrifice in resolving the budget deficit. 

JUNE 30, 2011 

Read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Pam Strunk, certifythat:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AES Red Oak, LLC (the “registrant”);

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)              Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: November 11, 2004
|   | /s/ Pam Strunk                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   | Pam Strunk  Chief Financial Officer |
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 7:03 AM
To: Adams, Darryl
Cc: Curry, Bridgid; Culligan, Kevin; Owens, Nicole; Wayland, Robertj Subject: RE: Final -- RIN 2060-AR88

Hi Darryl,

I’ve also opened up 2060-AR88, the modified and reconstructed source, so the final proposed rule can be uploaded.

Please let me know when both packages have been uploaded.

Regards, Cortney

From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:12 PM
To: Adams, Darryl
Cc: Curry, Bridgid; Culligan, Kevin; Owens, Nicole; Wayland, Robertj Subject: Final -- RIN 2060-AR88

Hi Darryl,

Attached is the final draft of the proposed rule to upload for RIN 2060-AR88, when ROCIS is up again.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards, Cortney

________________________________________________ Cortney Higgins, PhD Policy Analyst OMB/OIRA/NRE 202.395.7856 chiggins@omb.eop.gov
III 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 309 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 2, 2008 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District 

of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL 

4 GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL OLYMPICS LAW 

5 ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN. 

6 On June 6, 2008, or on such other date as the Speak7 er of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HCON 309 RDS 

1 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly des2 ignate, the 2008 District of Columbia Special Olympics 

3 Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 

4 to as the ‘‘event’’) may be run through the Capitol 

5 Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics 

6 torch to the District of Columbia Special Olympics sum7 mer games. 

8 SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD. 

9 The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as 

10 may be necessary to carry out the event. 

11 SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARA12 TIONS. 

13 The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions 

14 for physical preparations for the event. 

15 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

16 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce17 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

18 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise19 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

HCON 309 RDS 

1 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

2 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 

By ROBERT F. REEVES, 

Deputy Clerk. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C §
1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of OJSC Long-Distance and International Telecommunications
Rostelecom (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  (i)the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and  (ii)the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: June 30, 2008  /s/ Roman A. FrolovRoman A. FrolovChief Accountant (CFO)
Table 3. NPS Summary of EGU SCR Costs Averages Medians Counts Averages Medians Counts

by Source by Source by Source by NPS by NPS by NPS

EGU Reports or Agency or Agency 45 41

Emission rate w LNB+OFA+SCR 0.07 0.07 33 0.06 0.06 36

Reduction due to LNB+OFA+SCR 83% 83% 33 85% 86% 36

Total Captal Investment for LNB+OFA+SCR ($/kW) $ 344 $ 320 33 $ 126 $ 106 36

Total Annual Cost $15,587,616 $ 15,593,808 33 $ 7,736,772 $ 7,080,678 36

LNB+OFA+SCR Cost-Effectiveness ($/ton) $ 2,688 $ 2,635 33 $ 1,352 $ 1,303 36

Emission rate w SCR only 0.07 0.07 44 0.06 0.06 39

SCR inlet emission rate (lb/mmBtu) 0.32 0.29 44 0.30 0.26 39

Reduction due to SCR only 73% 75% 44 78% 77% 39

Total Capital Investment for SCR ($/kW) $ 319 $ 295 43 $ 99 $ 85 39

Total Annual Cost $16,655,913 $ 15,587,276 42 $ 6,441,686 $ 5,499,625 39

SCR Cost-Effectiveness ($/ton) $ 4,771 $ 4,440 43 $ 1,841 $ 1,774 39
#### R. H. Stearns Co. *v.*United States

No. 6812.

Entry No. 4019, etc.

Invoices dated December 2, 1941, etc.

Certified December 12, 1941, etc.

Entered at Boston, Mass., January 15, 1942, etc.

(Decided January 28, 1947)

*Joseph F. Lockett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar eases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 8405)

Entry Nos. 132-R; 145-R.

#### United States *v.*Wilbur G. Hallauer

(Decided March 17, 1955)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General *(Alfred J. Taylor, Jr.,*trial attorney), for the plaintiff.

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George B. Tuttle of*counsel) for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> 1) The unit values as entered of the American apples and boxes of United States origin represent the foreign value thereof as defined in section 402 (c), *474Tariff Act of 1930, there being no higher export value, and the value of the alterations to said apples due to their condition at the time of importation thereof is nil.

> 2)These cases may be submitted upon the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe American apples and boxes of United States origin here involved, and that such values were tbe entered unit values, and tbe value of tbe alteration to said apples was nil.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 65751.

#### J. M. Sutton Sons & Co. and H. W. Ebert Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/32176, etc. (New York).

*523Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 6395.

#### SUCCESSION OF MARGARET QUINN.

Syllabus.

Involves only issues of fact.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “B,’> No. 97,656. Honorable F. D. King, Judge.

MeCloskey & Benedict, for plaintiff and appellee.

Prowell & Prowell, for defendant and appellant.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Andrew Elliott, sometimes called Hays, impecunious for anything this record shows to the contrary, married but living apart from his wife and in open concubinage with the deceased for six years or more prior to her death, claims from this succession the sum of $1,150, practically absorbing the whole residuum thereof; the only assets (less a few dollars) being the price realized from the sale of a piece of real estate inherited by the deceased from her parents and in which the deceased lived alone with the claimant.

The claim is based upon a written acknowledgment made out in the hand writing of the claimant but purporting to have been signed by the deceased while she lay in bed, sick and unattended, in the house aforesaid, ■and only .a day or two before she was removed therefrom, by her sister at the suggestion of her doctor, and taken to a sanatarinm, where she died a few days later.

The only evidence in support of the genuineness of the signature is a sort of general resemblance to other signa*346tures of the deceased and claimant’s oath that she signed it in his presence.

Opinion and decree, June 14th, 1915.

Opposed to this is the testimony of an expert in handwriting, who declared that the signature was not that oj the deceased, but was affixed by the same hand which drew up the body of the instrument.

The trial Judge, who saw the witnesses did not 'believe the claimant, and considering the' circumstances neither are we able to do so.

The judgment appealed from seems to' us to be correct.

Judgment affirmed.
#### Sambrooks, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6822.

Entry No. 734322, etc.

Invoices dated Bradford, England, December 5, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 14, 1942, etc.

(Decided January 31, 1947)

*Strauss & Hedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, were filed for the purpose of testing the legality of the action of the *354appraiser in including as a part of the dutiable value of the merchandise the so-called British purchase tax. In submitting these appeals for decision counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the agreed facts and the law applicable thereto, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by these appeals to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importers on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.