alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Robert J. Paulsen, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                       
|----------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|February 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert J. Paulsen                 
|                  |  |     |  | Robert J. Paulsen                     
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Operating Officer,              
|                  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  Report  of  Competitive  Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2008, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John  B.  Nano,  Chairman,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer, Interim Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
knowledge:

     1.   the Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
          or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   the information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


                              /s/  John  B.  Nano
                              -------------------
                              John  B.  Nano
                              Chairman,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,
                              Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Chief
                              Accounting  Officer

                              March  17,  2008










                  *
                *****
              **-----**
            **-----       COMPETITIVE
          ****----        TECHNOLOGIES
            **=====       Unlocking the Potential of Innovation (R)
              **=====**
                *****
                  *  (R)  Technology Transfer and Licensing Services



                            www.competitivetech.net
                            -----------------------

                                       27
No. 48158.

#### Protests 876589-G, etc., of A. D. Cohen Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 47291 and *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained as to certain of the merchandise in question.
EXHIBIT2.1

 

CERTIFICATEOF AMENDMENT

OF

ARTICLESOF INCORPORATION

 

 

CULLEY W. DAVIS, and BRUCE H. HAGLUND certifythat:

 

1.                                       They arePresident and Secretary, respectively, of **HYDROMAIDINTERNATIONAL, INC**., a Nevada corporation.

 

2.                                       Pursuant toSection 78.390 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the Articles of Incorporation ofthis corporation shall be amended to read as follows:

 

**“Article IV - That the total authorized capital stock of thiscorporation shall be 40,000,000 shares having a par value of one mill ($0.001)per share.”**

 

3.                                       The foregoingamendment of Articles of Incorporation was adopted by Consent of the Board ofDirectors pursuant to Section 78.315 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, and byConsent of Majority Stockholders pursuant to Section 78.320 of the NevadaRevised Statutes.

 

4.                                       The totalnumber of outstanding shares of the corporation is 26,915,000. The number ofshares voting in favor of the Amendment was 18,000,000, which number equaled orexceeded the vote required. The percentage vote required was more than 50%.

 

                Wefurther declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Nevadathat the matters set forth in this certificate are true and correct of our ownknowledge.

 

Date: July 27, 2001.

 
|   | /s/ Culley W. Davis           |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | CULLY W. DAVIS, *President*   |
|   |                          |
|   | /s/ Bruce H. Haglund          |
|   | BRUCE H. HAGLUND, *Secretary* |
|   |                          |

 

 

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20717

Conference Calendar

 

ESEQUIEL RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BABBILI ANANDA; U.S. STAFF

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CV-246

--------------------

February 13, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Esequiel Rodriguez, Texas prisoner # 421876, appeals the

dismissal of his in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 42 U.S.C. § 1983

lawsuit asserting that he has been denied medical treatment. The

district court determined that Rodriguez was barred from

proceeding IFP by the “three-strikes” provision of the Prison

Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), because, on at least

four prior occasions, he has filed civil lawsuits which have been

dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. 
No. 00-20717

-2-

Rodriguez does not challenge this determination, and any argument

that the district court’s finding was error is waived. See Yohey

v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 223-24 (5th Cir. 1995). Instead,

Rodriguez asserts that his lawsuit was not a 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action but was a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. He is

incorrect. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973);

see also Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 820-21 (5th Cir. 1997).

Rodriguez has made no showing that he was in imminent danger

of serious physical injury at the time the instant suit was

filed, and he has therefore failed to demonstrate any error in

the district court’s dismissal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Banos

v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884-85 (5th Cir. 1998). Rodriguez is

thus BARRED from proceeding IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), his

IFP status is REVOKED, and he may not bring a civil action or

appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under § 1915

while incarcerated or detained in any facility, unless he is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). 

The appeal is DISMISSED.

Rodriguez has 30 days from the date of this opinion to pay

the full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the

district court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal. 

Rodriguez’s motion for release pending appeal is DENIED.

IFP REVOKED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 06

- 795 V

(Not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

ROBERT BEVILL *

and JANICE BEVILL

, *

as parents of VB , a minor, *

*

Petitioner s

, *

* Filed: August 18 , 2015

v. *

* Decision on Attorneys’

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Fees and Costs

HUMAN SERVICES *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

DECISION (ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS)

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 1 I is sued a

D ecision on March 11 , 2015 . On July 30 , 2015 , Petitioners filed an Application for award of

a ttorneys’ f

ees and c osts in this matter. P etitioners’ Application re quests a total payment o f

$ 4,351.18 , representin g attorn e ys’ fees and costs of $ 2,401.80, and $1,949.38 of costs expended

by P etitioner s

.

Respondent has not filed any objection to Petitioners’ Application for award of attorneys ’

fees and costs.

I find that this Petition was filed and pursued in good faith and with a reasonable basis.

Thus, a n award for fees and costs is appropriate at this time, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(b)

and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amounts seem reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I

hereby award the following attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(b) and

(e)(1):

1 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 10 et seq . (2006).• a l ump sum of $2,401.80 , in the form of a che ck payable jointly to P etitioner s

and P etiti on er s’ counsel, Richard Gage , on account of services performed by

counsel’s law firm.

• a lump sum of $1,949.38 , in the form of a che ck pay able to P etitioner s

, which represents P etitioner s’ own litigation expenses in this case.

In t he absence of a timely

- filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of the

Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in

accordance herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

/s/ George L. Hastings , Jr.

George L. Hastings, Jr.

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing the

right to seek review.
Exhibit 32.2


                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of China  BAK  Battery,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB/A  for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I, Han
Yongbin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:


         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Han Yongbin
   ------------------------
   Han Yongbin
   Chief Financial Officer
   February 2, 2006
No. 6207.

#### OCTAVE LEMON, ET ALS., vs. L. H. MARRERO, SHERIFF, AND MARY JANE WRIGHT, ADMINISTRATRIX OF SUCCESSION OF SOLOMON LEMON.

Syllabus.

1. The requirement as to notice of judgment pertains to the execution of and appeals from judgments and is wholly foreign to the matter of applications for a new trial.

2. After a judgment has been signed and the delays for applying for a new trial have expired, the trial Court is powerless to revise the judgment.

*75Appeal from the 28th Judicial District 'Court, Parish of Jefferson, Honorable P. E. Edrington, Judge.

P. E. Edrington, Jr., for plaintiff and appellee.

C. A. Buchler, for defendant ¡and appellant

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the 'Court, as follows:

On May 1st, 1914, judgment was rendered and signed, maintaining defendant’s exception and dismissing plaintiff’s suit. More than three judicial days thereafter, namely, May 19th, the plaintiff applied for a new trial, and it was granted. Thereupon defendant appealed and in support thereof contends that the motion applying for a new trial and the judgment granting same should be reversed, as more than three judicial days having elapsed since the signing of the judgment, it was too late for the trial Court to entertain or pass upon a motion for a new trial or in any way to revise its own judgment.

The contention is well founded under U. P., 558, which with certainty fixes the delay within which a new trial should be sought. This delay runs from the rendition of the judgment and not from the date when the judgment ha,s been notified. The requirement as to notice has to do solely with the execution of the judgment' and the delays for appeal.

As the trial Court was wholly powerless to entertain the application for a new trial, it is futile to enquire into or consider the grounds upon which it granted same in the present instance.

Noland & Morancy vs. Bemis, 14 A., 49.

State ex rel. Mahan vs. Bank, 28 A., 874.

The judgment is set aside, annulled .and reversed and it is now decreed that there be judgment dismissing the ap*76plication for a new trial at the costs of the plaintiff in both Courts

Opinion and decree, November 23, 1914.

Judgment reversed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 134 (Friday, July 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 41916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16720]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Addition to the procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds a service to the Procurement List that will 
be provided by a nonprofit agency employing persons who are blind or 
have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Effective Date: August 12, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia, 
22202-4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 
603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Addition

    On May 3, 2013 (78 FR 25970-25971), the Committee for Purchase From 
People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice of proposed 
addition to the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agency to provide the service and 
impact of the addition on the current or most recent contractors, the 
Committee has determined that the service listed below is suitable for 
procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 8501-8506 and 41 
CFR 51-2.4.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organization that will provide the service to the 
Government.
    2. The action will result in authorizing a small entity to provide 
the service to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 
8501-8506) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.

End of Certification

    Accordingly, the following service is added to the Procurement 
List:

Service

Service Type/Location: Custodial and Grounds Maintenance Service, El 
Paso Service Processing Center, 8915 Montana Avenue, El Paso, TX.
NPA: Mavagi Enterprises, Inc., San Antonio, TX.
Contracting Activity: DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION 
AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DETENTION MANAGEMENT--DC OFFICE, 
WASHINGTON, DC.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-16720 Filed 7-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
No. 40403.

#### Protest 552975-G of Kellog Van Winkle (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

On the authority of *Willet*v. *United States*(T. D. 48134) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1812 was sustained.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, James A. Rotherham,  C.P.A., Chief Financial Officer of Kintera,Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, towhich this certification is attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Registrant.

 

 

Dated: November 15, 2004

 

 
| /s/ James A. Rotherham,  C.P.A. |
|---------------------------------|
| James A. Rotherham, C.P.A.      |
| Chief Financial Officer         |
| (Principal Financial  Officer)  |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to Kintera and will be retained by Kintera and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
No. 54943.

#### Van Gelder-Fanto Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 134551-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of dried brain similar in all material respects to the substance passed upon in *Biological Raw Products Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1253). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 1, 2014

p0325

Order 

Clerk

April 1, 2014

147130 & (27)

POSEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 147130

COA: 311214

Wayne CC: 09-003465-CK

CITY OF DEARBORN,

Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff- Appellee,

v

NEYER, TISEO & HINDO, LTD., 

d/b/a NTH CONSULTANTS, LTD.,

Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to supplement the record is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for
the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Li Xiangqian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | August 22, 2006
|----- | ---------------



By:

/s/ Li XiangqianLi XiangqianChief Executive Officer
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Chris
      R. Decker, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:  May
      21,
      2007




/s/
              Chris R. DeckerChris
              R. Decker, Chief Financial
              Officer