### 20296 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules

TABLE 

### 2—C OMPLETENESS 

### P ERCENTAGES FOR 

### C OUNTIES IN THE 

### B I 

### -S TATE 

### C HARLOTTE 

### , N ORTH AND 

### S OUTH 

### C AROLINA 

### N ONATTAINMENT 

### A REA OR THE 

### 1997 8-H OUR 

### O ZONE 

### NAAQS

Location AQS site ID 2008 (%) 2009 (%) 2010 (%) 2008–2010Completeness average (%)

Lincoln County (NC) ........... 1487 Riverview Rd. (37–109–0004) ............................... 97 98 96 97 Mecklen- ............................. burg County (NC) ............... 1130 Eastway Dr (37–119–0041) ................................... 100 97 99 99

Mecklen- ............................. burg County (NC) ............... 400 Westinghouse Blvd. (37–119–1005) ....................... 100 97 99 99

Mecklen- ............................. burg County (NC) ............... 29 N @ Mecklenburg Cab Co. ( 37–119–1009) ............ 98 98 98 98

Rowan County (NC) ........... 301 West St & Gold Hill Ave. (37–159–0021) ................ 93 91 95 93 Rowan County (NC) ........... 925 N Enochville Ave. (37–159–0022) ........................... 99 97 93 96 Union County (NC) ............. 701 Charles St. (37–179–0003) ..................................... 98 96 98 97

EPA’s review of these data indicate that the bi-state Charlotte Area has met and continues to meet the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. V. Proposed Action

EPA is proposing to determine that the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina-South Carolina 1997 8-hour nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on 2008–2010 complete, quality-assured, quality-controlled and certified monitoring data. As provided in 40 CFR 51.918, if EPA finalizes this determination, it would suspend the requirements for the States of North and South Carolina to submit, for the bi-state Charlotte Area, an attainment demonstrations and associated RACM analyses, RFP plans, contingency measures, and any other planning SIPs related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS as long as the Area continues to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

This action proposes to make a determination of attainment based on air quality, and would, if finalized, result in the suspension of certain federal requirements, and it would not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:

• Is not a ‘‘ significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

• Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. );

• Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);

• Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

• Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

• is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

• Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and

• Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed 1997 8-hour ozone clean NAAQS data determination for the bi-state Charlotte Area does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

Dated: March 31, 2011. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2011–8705 Filed 4–11–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R04–OAR–2006–0130–201111(b); FRL–9293–5]** 

**Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Florida;**  **Prevention of Significant Deterioration**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is proposing to convert a conditional approval of provisions in the Florida State Implementation Plan (SIP) to a full approval under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). On June 17, 2009, the State of Florida, through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, submitted a SIP revision in response to the conditional approval of its New Source Review (NSR) permitting program. The revision includes changes to certain parts of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration construction permit program in Florida, including the definition of ‘‘new emissions unit, ’’ ‘‘regulated air pollutant’’ and ‘‘ significant emissions
rate ’’ as well as recordkeeping requirements. In addition, Florida provided a clarification that the significant emissions rate for mercury in the Florida regulations is intended to apply as a state-only provision. EPA has determined that this revision addresses the conditions identified in the


### 20297 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules

conditional approval, and is therefore approvable. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register , EPA is approving the State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. This proposed action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the CAA.

**DATES :**  Written comments must be received on or before May 12, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– OAR–2006–0130, by one of the following methods:

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.

2. E-mail: adams.yolanda@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2006–0130 Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Ms. Yolanda Adams, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.

Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to submit
comments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For information regarding the Florida SIP, contact Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Bradley may also be reached via telephone or electronic mail at (404) 562–9352 and bradley.twunjala@epa.gov. For information regarding NSR, contact Yolanda Adams, Air Permits Section, at the same address above. Ms. Adams may also be reached via telephone or electronic mail at (404) 562–9214 and adams.yolanda@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  For additional information see the direct final rule which is published in the Rules Section of this Federal Register

. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.

Dated: March 31, 2011. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2011–8700 Filed 4–11–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**47 CFR Parts 1, 6, 7, and 8**

**[CG Docket No. 10–213; WT Docket No. 96– 198; CG Docket No. 10–145; DA 11–595]** 

**Implementing the Provisions of the Communications Act of 1934, as**  **Enacted by the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video**  **Accessibility Act of 2010**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment period.

**SUMMARY :**  In this document, the Commission extends the comment and reply comment period deadlines. This action is taken in order to provide a limited extension to serve the public interest by allowing parties additional time to fully and carefully analyze the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to adopt rules that implement provisions in section 104 of the

‘‘Twenty-first Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010. ’’

**DATES :**  Submit comments on or before April 25, 2011. Submit reply comments on or before May 23, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. You may submit comments, identified by DA 11–595, or by CG Docket No. 10–213, WT Docket No. 96–198, CG Docket No. 10–145, by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Federal Communications Commission’s Web Site: http:// www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail : FCC504@fcc.gov

or phone : (202) 418–0530 or TTY : (202)
418–0432.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jeffrey Tignor, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC at (202) 418–0774 or via the Internet to Jeffrey.Tignor@fcc.gov or Rosaline Crawford, Disability Rights Office, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, FCC at (202) 418–2075 or via the Internet to Rosaline.Crawford@fcc.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This is a summary of an Order, DA 11–595, adopted and released by the FCC on April 4, 2011, in CG Docket No. 10–213; WT Docket No. 96–198; CG Docket No. 10–145; FCC 11–37. The full text of this document is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Room CY–A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text may be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, (202) 488–5300, facsimile (202) 488– 5563, or via e-mail at fcc@bcpiweb.com

. The complete text is also available on the Commission’s Web site at http:// wireless.fcc.gov/edocs—public/ attachment/DA 11-595A1doc. This full text may also be downloaded at: http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases.html

. Alternative formats (computer diskette, large print, audio cassette, and Braille) are available by contacting Brian Millin at (202) 418–7426, TTY (202) 418–7365, or via e-mail to bmillin@fcc.gov.
Summary

This Order extends the deadlines for filing comments and reply comments concerning the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to adopt rules that implement provisions in Section 104 of the ‘‘Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 ’’ (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘CVAA’’ ). See Implementation of Sections 716 and 717 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 , CG Docket No. 10–213, Amendments to the Commission’s Rules Implementing Sections 255 and 251(a)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Enacted by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 , WT Docket No. 96–198,