Onyx Environmental Services 

Sauget, Illinois 

Evaluation of Metals, Particulate 

Matter, Hydrogen 

Chloride/Chlorine Gas and 

PCDD/PCDF Emissions for 

Incinerators 3 and 4 

August 2002 Test Program 

ENSR Corporation 

November 2002 

Document Number 10002-004-400 
r 

CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 

1.1 Program Summary 1-1 

1.2 - Field Program Schedule 1-1 

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2-1 

2.1 Introduction 2-1 

2.2 Stack Emission Results for PCDDs/PCDFs 2-1 

2.3 Stack Emission Results for Target Metals 2-1 

2.4 Stack Emission Results for Particulate matter, HCI, and Cl 2 2-2 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 3-1 

3.1 Sampling Procedures 3-1 

3.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Gas Determinations 3-1 

3.1.2 PCDD/PCDF Sampling : 3-1 

3.1.3 Metals Sampling 3-1 

3.1.4 PM/HCI/CI 2 Sampling Procedure 3-1 

3.2 Analytical Procedures 3-2 

3.2.1 PCDD/PCDF Analyses 3-2 

3.2.2 Metals Analyses 3-2 

3.2.3 PM/HCI/Cb Analysis 3-2 

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 4-1 

4.1 Introduction 4-1 

4.2 Stack Sampling QA/QC 4-1 

4.3 Chain-of-Custody 4-2 

4.4 Analytical QA/QC 4-2 

4.4.1 Analysis for Metals 4-2 

V 4.4.2 Analysis for PCDDs/PCDFs 4-3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx j _ November, 200 2 

Report2.doc 
CONTENTS - CONTINUED 

4.4.3 Analysis for Particulate Matter 4-3 

4.4.4 Analysis for HCI/CI2 4-3 

APPENDICES 

A - Field Data Sheets 

B - Process Feed and Operating Conditions 

C - Field Equipment Calibration Forms 

D - Analytical Data Reports 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\0nyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

ii November , 200 2 
ElttR 

INTERNATIONAL 

LIST OF TABLES 

Table 2-1 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 Condition 1 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - TEQ 

Basis 2-3 

Table 2-2 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 Condition 1 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results -

Congener Class Totals 2-4 

Table 2-3 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 Condition 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - TEQ 

Basis 2-5 

Table 2-4 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 Condition 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results -

Congener Class Totals 2-6 

Table 2-5 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 4 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - TEQ Basis 2-7 

Table 2-6 Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 4 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - Congener Class Totals. 2-8 

Table 2-7 Summary of HWC MACT Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 2-9 

Table 2-8 Summary of HWC MACT Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 2-10 

Table 2-9 Summary of HWC MACT Metals Emissions for Unit 4 2-1.1 

Table 2-10 Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 2-12 

Table 2-11 Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 2-15 

Table 2-12 Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 4 2-18 

Table 2-13 PM/HCI/CI2 Emission Results for Unit 3 Condition 1 2-21 

Table 2-14 PM/HCI/CI2 Emission Results for Unit 3 Condition 2.... 2-22 

Table 2-15 PM/HCI/CI2 Emission Results for Unit 4 2-23 

J:\Air_ToxVProject Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx ||| November, 200 2 

Report2.doc 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 

1.1 Program Summary 

ENS R International was retained by Onyx Environmental Services, Sauget, Illinois to conduct 

stack gas emission sampling during the week of August 19, 2002 on two incinerators at the 

facility. Unit 3 and Unit 4 were both tested for dioxins and furans in accordance with EPA Method 

0023, twelve (12) metals 1 in accordance with EPA Method 29 and particulate matter (PM), 

hydrogen chloride (HCI), and chlorine (Cl 2 ) in accordance to EPA Method 0050. Stack flows were 

determined by pitot tube/water manometer as part of the actual sampling process. Stack moisture 

was determined by measuring the volume gained in the sampling train during sampling. Oxygen 

and carbon dioxide were determined by collecting a Tediar bag sample followed by ORSAT 

analysis. 

Method 0023 samples were labeled, packaged and shipped following accepted protocols to Alta 

Analytical, El Dorado Hills, C A for the dioxin and furan analysis. Method 29 samples were 

labeled, packaged and shipped following accepted protocols to PSC Analytical Services, 

Burlington, Ontario (Canada). The front-half fractions from the Method 0050 sampling train (fronthalf rinse and particulate filter) were labeled, packaged and shipped following accepted protocols 

to ENSR' s Air Toxics Laboratory in Harvard MA where they were subjected to gravimetric 

analysis. Back-half fractions from this sampling train were also sent to PS C Analytical Services, 

Burlington, Ontario for HCI and Cl 2 determination. The HCI and Cl 2 analyses were performed in 

accordance with EPA Method 9057 (ion chromatography). In addition to program samples, ENSR 

prepared two field blanks for analysis, one for each incinerator stack. 

1.2 Field Program Schedule 

The test was completed over a five-day time frame as follows: 

August 19— Travel to the site and set up on stack of Unit 4; 

August 20 - Completed Run 1 and 2 on Unit 4; 

August 21 - Completed Run 3 on Unit 4, move and set-up equipment on Unit 3; 

August 22 - Completed Run 1, 2, and 3 on Unit 3; 

1

 Thes e metals included: antimony , arsenic , barium, beryllium, cadmium , chromium , lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, 

silver an d thallium. 

J:\Air_Tox\Projed Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

1-1 November, 200 2 
INTeRNATIONAL 

August 23 - Completed Run 4 on Unit 3, prepared samples for shipment, departed site. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workWjg 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

1-2 November, 200 2 
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

2.1 Introduction 

This section summarizes the test program results. Emissions data are summarized in this section and 

feed and process operating data are included in Appendix B. 

2.2 Stack Emission Results for PCDDs/PCDFs 

A summary of the PCDD/PCDF emission results for Unit 3 Condition 1/2 and Unit 4 are included in 

Tables 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3 respectively. These results indicate that: 

The PCDD/PCDF emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were 0.35 

ng/m3 @ 7% 02 ) are below the HWC MACT emission standard of 0.4 ng/m3 @ 7% 02 ); 

. The PCDD/PCDF emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 (average emissions for runs 3 and 4 were 1.02 

ng/m3@ 7% 02 ) are above the HWC MACT emission standard of 0.2 ng/m3 @ 7% 02 ; 

• The PCDD/PCDF emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for runs 1, 2, and 3 were 0.12 ng/m3 @ 

7% 02 ) are below the HWC MACT emission standard of 0.2 ng/m3 @ 7% 02 ; 

2.3 Stack Emission Results for Target Metals 

A summary of the metals emissions for both incinerators is provided in Tables 2-4 through 2-9. Tables 

2-4 through 2-6 provide a summary of metals emissions categorized by Low Volatile Metals (LVM), 

Semi-volatile Metals (SVM) and mercury. Tables 2-7 through 2-9 provide a detailed summary of the 

individual metals emissions for all twelve metals. It should be noted that it was necessary to perform a 

post test calibration on the meter box that was used for the metals sampling train (Box # 80999). The 

resultant calibration factor and Delta H were utilized for emissions calculations in accordance with the 

specified method criteria in section 4. For further discussion regarding the Method 5 post-test 

calibration procedure, please refer to section 4.2. The target metals results indicate that: 

The LVM and SVM metals emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 

were < 8.36 pg/m3 @ 7% 02for LVMs and 4.10 pg/m3 @ 7% 02for SVMs) were lower than the 

new HWC MACT emission standards of 97 pg/m3 and 240 pg/m3 (corrected to 7% 02 ) for LVMs 

and SVMs respectively; 

• The mercury emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 (average for runs 1 and 2 were < 1192.40 pg/m3 @ 

7% 02 ) were above the new HWC MACT emission standard of 130 pg/m3 @ 7% 02 . 

The LVM and SVM metals emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 (average emissions for runs 3 and 4 

were < 11.77 pg/m3 @ 7% 0 2 for LVMs.and 8.26 pg/m3 @ 7% 0 2 for SVMs) were lower than the 

new HWC MACT emission standards of 97 pg/m3 and 240 pg/m3 (corrected to 7% 02 ) for LVMs 

and SVMs respectively; 

J:\AirJTox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 wor1c\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-1 November, 200 2 
ENSR. 

The mercury emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 (average for runs 3 and 4 were < 1312.98 ug/m3 @ 

7% 02 ) were above the new HWC MACT emission standard of 130 pg/m3 @ 7% 02 . 

The LVM and SVM metals emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for three (3) runs were < 89.56 

pg/m3 @ 7% 02for LVMs and 106.10 pg/m3 @ 7% 02for SVMs) were lower than the new HWC 

MACT emission standards of 97 pg/m3 and 240 pg/m3 (corrected to 7% 02 ) for LVMs and SVMs 

respectively; 

The mercury emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for three (3) runs were 726.02 pg/m3 @ 7% 

02 ) were above the new HWC MACT emission standard of 130 pg/m3 @ 7% 02 . 

2.4 Stack Emission Results for Particulate matter, HCI, and Cl 2 

A summary of the PM/HCI/CI 2 emissions for both incinerators is provided in Tables 2-10 and 2-12. The 

data set shows emissions of PM to be below the MACT limit of 34 mg/dscm (0.015 gr/dscf). Emission 

levels for HCI and Cl 2 were also well below the MACT limit of 77 ppm. The results for Units 3 and 4 

were as follows: 

The particulate matter emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were 

3.89 mg/dscm @ 7% 02 ). 

The particulate matter emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 (average emissions for runs 3 and 4 were 

5.30 mg/dscm @ 7% 02 ). 

The particulate matter emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for three (3) runs were 33.59 mg/ 

dscm @ 7% 02 ). 

The HCI/CI2 emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 (average emissions for runs 1 and 2 were 23.21 ppm, 

@7% 02 ). 

The HCI/CI2 emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 (average emissions for runs 3 and 4 were 11.93 ppm, 

@7%02 ). 

The HCl/Cl 2 emissions for Unit 4 (average emissions for three (3) runs was 43.64 ppm, @7% 02 ). 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Rles\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 lesting\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-2 November, 200 2 
ENR. 

Table 2-1 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 Condition 1 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - TEQ 

Basis 

Sampl e Volum e 

R u n No . 

Dat e 

Start Tim e 

Sto p Tim e 

Units 

dsc f 

1 

22/Aug/0 2 

08:0 5 

11:2 8 

112.14 2 

2 

22/Aug/0 2 

11:51 

15:0 9 

115.64 4 

Sampl e Volum e m

3 3.1 8 3.2 7 

Moistur e Conten t % v/ v 37. 3 37. 0 

0 2 Cone . % v/v (dry) 13.4 0 12.8 0 

C 0 2 Cone . % v/v (dry) 4.7 0 4.5 0 

Isokinetic s % 1 0 2 101 

Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,46 3 5,67 8 

PCDD/PCD F 

Parameter s T E F (a) 

p g / 

s a m pi e 

ng/m 3 

T E Q 

p g / 

sampl e 

ng/m 3 

T E Q 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 

TOTAL TCDD 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 

TOTAL PeCDD 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 

1.2.3.6.7.8- HxCDD 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDD 

TOTAL HxCDD 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 

TOTAL HpCDD 

OCDD 

1.00 

0.0 0 

0.5 0 

0.0 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.0 0 

0.01 

0.0 0 

0.0 0 

21. 5 

2,57 0 

139. 0 

4,85 0 

163. 0 

417. 0 

280. 0 

14,20 0 

3,16 0 

7,14 0 

3,93 0 

6.8E-0 3 

O.OE+0 0 

2.2E-0 2 

0.0E+O 0 

5.1 E-0 3 

1.3E-0 2 

8.8E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

1.0E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

1.2E-0 3 

11. 2 

3,08 0 

73. 9 

3,81 0 

8 3 

2 0 9 

1 3 5 

8,61 0 

1,260 

2,88 0 

1,540 

3.4E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

1.1E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

2.5E-0 3 

6.4E-0 3 

4.1 E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

3.8E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

4.7E-0 4 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 

TOTAL TCDF 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 

TOTAL PeCDF 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 

2.3.4.6.7.8- HxCDF 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDF 

TOTAL HxCDF 

1.2.3.4.6.7.8- HpCDF 

1.2.3.4.7.8.9- HpCDF 

TOTAL HpCDF 

OCDF 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3) 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m1® 

TOTAL TEQs (g/s) 

0.1 0 

0.0 0 

0.0 5 

0.5 0 

0.0 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.0 0 

0.01 

0.01 

0.0 0 

0.0 0 

7 % 0 2 ) 

2 1 0 

6,90 0 

3 0 9 

6 8 9 

7,37 0 

4 6 8 

4 1 8 

6 3 3 

1 0 5 

5,79 0 

1,79 0 

1 2 3 

2,72 0 

3 0 3 

6.6E-0 3 

0.0 E + 0 0 

4.9E-0 3 

1.1E-0 1 

O.OE+0 0 

1.5E-0 2 

1.3E-0 2 

2.0E-0 2 

3.3E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

5.6E-0 3 

3.9E-0 4 

0.0 E + 0 0 

9.5E-0 5 

0.24 4 

0.45 0 

6.3E-1 0 

181 

6,26 0 

1 9 7 

4 5 7 

5,52 0 

2 4 3 

2 0 9 

4 0 4 

6 5 

3,96 0 

6 7 3 

8 6 

1,430 

1 4 7 

5.5E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

3.0E-0 3 

7.0E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

7.4E-0 3 

6.4E-0 3 

1.2E-0 2 

2.OE-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

2.1E-0 3 

2.6E-0 4 

0.0 E + 0 0 

4.5E-0 5 

0.141 

0.24 0 

3.8E-1 0 

( a ) U.S.EP A (1989) Toxi c Equivalenc y Facto r 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Field\Unit 3\fm23 unit3 c1.xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-3 November, 2002 
ENCR 

WTEflf/AT/OIUAt. 

Table 2-2 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 Condition 1 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results -

Congener Class Totals 

Run No. 1 2 ' x 

Date 22/Aug/02 22/Aug/02 

Start Time 08:05 11:51 

Stop Time 

1 In ite 

11:28 15:09 

Sample Volume 

O f If to 

dscf 112.142 115.644 

Sample Volume m

3 3.176 3.27 

Moisture Content % v/v 37.3 37.0 

0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 13.4 12.8 

C 0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 4.7 4.5 

Isokinetics % 102 101 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,463 5,678 

% PCDD/PCD F pg/ pg/ 

Parameters sample ng/m3 sample ng/m3 

:

f: TOTAL TCDD 2,570 8.1 E-01 3,080 9.4E-01 

x; TOTAL PeCDD 4,850 1.5E+00 3,810 1.2E+00 ••:] 

:;: TOTAL HxCDD 14,200 4.5E+00 8,610 2.6E+00 ji:; 

!: TOTAL HpCDD 7,140 2.2E+00 2,880 8.8E-01 

> OCDD 3,930 1.2E+00 1,540 4.7E-01 

x | TOTAL TCDF 6,900 2.2E+00 6,260 1.9E+00 x; 

•x TOTAL PeCDF 7,370 2.3E+00 5,520 1.7E+00 ;x 

<:[ TOTAL HxCDF 5,790 1.8E+00 3,960 1.2E+00 

:x HpCDF 2,720 8.6E-01 1,430 4.4E-01 

: OCDF 303 9.5E-02 147 4.5E-02 

X TOTAL tetra-octa (ng/m') = 17.6 

• TOTAL tetra-octa (ng/m'@ 7 % O,) = 32.4 19.4 

TOTAL tetra-octa (g/s) = 4.5E-08 3.0E-08 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Fiies\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-4 November, 2002 
ENSft. 

mre/iAiariOKAL 

Table 2-3 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 Condition 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - TEQ 

Basis 

R u n No . 3 4 

Dat e 22/Aug/0 2 23/Aug/0 2 

Start Tim e 15:3 8 07:5 2 

Sto p Tim e 

/ In iff: 

18:41 10:5 4 

Sampl e Volum e 

LI II1 to 

dsc f 119.78 8 109.87 4 

Sampl e Volum e m

3 3.3 9 3.11 

Moistur e Conten t % v/ v 36. 5 36. 7 

O z Cone . % v/v (dry) 13.0 0 13.2 0 

C Q 2 Cone . % v/v (dry) 4.5 0 4.8 0 

Isokinetic s % 1 0 2 1 0 2 

Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,82 9 5,36 7 

PCDD/PCD F 

Parameter s T E F (a) 

p g / 

sampl e 

ng/m 3 

T E Q 

p g / 

sampl e 

ng/m 3 

T E Q 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 

TOTAL TCDD 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 

TOTAL PeCDD 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 

1.2.3.6.7.8- HxCDD 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDD 

TOTAL HxCDD 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 

TOTAL HpCDD 

OCDD 

1.00 

0.0 0 

0.5 0 

0.0 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.0 0 

0.01 

0.0 0 

0.0 0 

40. 0 

12,20 0 

305. 0 

14,30 0 

317. 0 

993. 0 

555. 0 

25,00 0 

5,46 0 

12,10 0 

5,96 0 

1.2E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

4.5E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

9.3E-0 3 

2.9E-0 2 

1.6E-0 2 

O.OE+0 0 

1.6E-0 2 

O.OE+0 0 

1.8E-0 3 

28.1 

6,91 0 

217. 0 

8,76 0 

2 2 9 

6 0 8 

3 9 1 

15,20 0 

3,40 0 

7,72 0 

3,59 0 

9.0E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

3.5E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

7.4E-0 3 

2.0E-0 2 

1.3E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

1.1 E-0 2 

O.OE+0 0 

1.2E-0 3 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 

TOTAL TCDF 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 

TOTAL PeCDF 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 

2.3.4.6.7.8- HxCDF 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDF 

TOTAL HxCDF 

1.2.3.4.6.7.8- HpCDF 

1.2.3.4.7.8.9- HpCDF 

TOTAL HpCDF 

OCDF 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3) 

0.1 0 

0.0 0 

0.0 5 

0.5 0 

0.0 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.0 0 

0.01 

0.01 

0.0 0 

0.0 0 

651 

23,80 0 

6 9 6 

1,860 

24,90 0 

1,19 0 

9 5 4 

2,76 0 

4 6 0 

22,80 0 

3,23 0 

8 9 2 

10,30 0 

1,310 

1.9E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

1.0E-0 2 

2.7E-0 1 

O.OE+0 0 

3.5E-0 2 

2.8E-0 2 

8.1E-0 2 

1.4E-0 2 

O.OE+0 0 

9.5E-0 3 

2.6E-0 3 

0.0E+O 0 

3.9E-0 4 

0.60 4 

4 4 8 

23,10 0 

7 2 4 

1,69 0 

25,80 0 

9 5 8 

9 6 2 

2,25 0 

2 9 2 

19,40 0 

2,38 0 

4 6 6 

5,92 0 

5 7 9 

1.4E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

1.2E-0 2 

2.7E-0 1 

O.OE+0 0 

3.1 E-0 2 

3.1 E-0 2 

7.2E-0 2 

9.4E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

7.6E-0 3 

1.5E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

1.9E-0 4 

0.54 6 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3 @ 7 % O 2 ) 

TOTAL TEQs (g/s) 

1.057 

1.7E-0 9 

0.98 0 

1.4E-0 9 

(a) U.S.EP A (1989) Toxi c Equivalenc y Facto r 

J:V\ir_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 !esting\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-5 November. 2002 
Table 2-4 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 3 Condition 2 PCDD/PCDF Emission 

Results - Congener Class Totals 

Run No. 3 4 

Date 22/Aug/02 23/Aug/02 

Start Time 15:38 07:52 

Stop Time 

1 lnit<z 

18:41 10:54 

Sample Volume 

IJI ff IO 

dscf 119.788 109.874 

Sample Volume m

3 3.392 3.11 

Moisture Content % v/v 36.5 36.7 

0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 13.0 13.2 

C 0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 4.5 4.8 

Isokinetics % 102 102 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,829 5,367 

PCDD / PCDF pg/ pg/ 

Parameters sample ng/m3 sample ng/m3 

:•: TOTAL TCDD 12,200 3.6E+00 6,910 2.2E+00 

•:i TOTAL PeCDD 14,300 4.2E+00 8,760 2.8E+00 

:: TOTAL HxCDD 25,000 7.4E+00 15,200 4.9E+00 

>: TOTAL HpCDD 12,100 3.6E+00 7,720 2.5E+00 

::: OCDD 5,960 1.8E+00 3,590 1.2E+00 

>> TOTAL TCDF 23,800 7.0E+00 23,100 7.4E+00 

:> TOTAL PeCDF 24,900 7.3E+00 25,800 8.3E+00 

TOTAL HxCDF 22,800 6.7E+00 19,400 • 6.2E+00 

: :; TOTAL HpCDF 10,300 3.0E+00 5,920 1.9E+00 

: OCDF 1,310 3.9E-01 579 1.9E-01 

: : TOTAL tetra-octa (ng/m3) 45.0 37.6 

: : TOTAL tetra-octa (ng/m'@ 7 % 0 ,) 78.8 67.5 

: TOTAL tetra-octa (g/s) 1.2E-07 9.5E-08 

J:\Air_Tox\Prpject Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Re!d\Unit 3\(m23 unit3 c1.xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Projec1 Fi)es\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worWVug 02 iesting\Report\Onyx 2*6 

Report2.doc 

November, 2002 
ENSR. 

Table 2-5 ONYX Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 4 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - TEQ 

Basis 

Run No. 1 2 3 

Date 20/Aug/02 20/Aug/02 21/Aug/02 

Start Time 09:3 5 14:1 0 09:4 5 

Stop Time 12:5 7 17:4 3 12:3 5 

Sampl e Volum e 

will to 

dsc f 129.10 0 126.52 1 131.16 3 

Sampl e Volum e m

3 3.6 6 3.5 8 3.71 

Moistur e Conten t % v/ v 36. 3 37. 0 36. 5 

0 2 Cone . :% v/v (dry) 13.5 0 13.7 0 13.9 0 

C O z Cone . % v/v (dry) 4.7 0 4.0 0 4.0 0 

Isokinetic s % 101 101 101 

Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 16,50 7 16,17 3 16,78 8 

PCDD/PCD F 

Parameter s T E F (a) 

p g / 

sampl e 

ng/m 3 

T E Q 

p g / 

sampl e 

ng/m 3 

T E Q 

p g / 

sampl e 

ng/m 3 

T E Q 

2,3,7,8-TCDD 

TOTAL TCDD 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 

TOTAL PeCDD 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 

1.2.3.6.7.8- HxCDD 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDD 

TOTAL HxCDD 

1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 

TOTAL HpCDD 

OCDD 

1.00 

0.0 0 

0.5 0 

0.0 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.0 0 

0.01 

0.0 0 

0.0 0 

10. 4 

1,56 0 

46. 5 

1,68 0 

51. 6 

108. 0 

70. 7 

2,28 0 

5 8 5 

1,28 0 

5 3 8 

2.8E-0 3 

O.OE+0 0 

6.4E-0 3 

O.OE+0 0 

1.4E-0 3 

3.0E-0 3 

1.9E-0 3 

O.OE+0 0 

1.6E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

1.5E-0 4 

6.7 

1,41 0 

40. 1 

1,56 0 

4 3 

9 7 

5 9 

2,06 0 

4 9 0 

1,07 0 

4 4 2 

1.9E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

5.6E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

1.2E-0 3 

2.7E-0 3 

1.7E-0 3 

O.OE+0 0 

1.4E-0 3 

O.OE+0 0 

1.2E-0 4 

15. 0 

2,280. 0 

67. 4 

2,500. 0 

77. 1 

162. 0 

113. 0 

3,43 0 

8 8 0 

1,91 0 

7 9 4 

4.OE-0 3 

O.OE+0 0 

9.1 E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

2.1 E-0 3 

4.4E-0 3 

3.0E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

2.4E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

2.1 E-0 4 

2,3,7,8-TCDF 

TOTAL TCDF 

1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 

2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 

TOTAL PeCDF 

1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 

1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 

2.3.4.6.7.8- HxCDF 

1.2.3.7.8.9- HxCDF 

TOTAL HxCDF 

1.2.3.4.6.7.8- HpCDF 

1.2.3.4.7.8.9- HpCDF 

TOTAL HpCDF 

OCDF 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3) 

TOTAL TEQs (ng/m3 @ 7 "A 

TOTAL TEQs (g/s) 

0.1 0 

0.0 0 

0.0 5 

0.5 0 

0.0 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.1 0 

0.0 0 

0.01 

0.01 

0.0 0 

0.0 0 

0 3 ) 

5 7 

2,02 0 

7 9 

1 6 3 

1,61 0 

1 0 7 

1 1 5 

1 7 9 

4 5 

1,210 

3 3 8 

5 3 

5 6 3 

1 2 4 

1.5E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

1.1 E-0 3 

2.2E-0 2 

O.OE+0 0 

2.9E-0 3 

3.1E-0 3 

4.9E-0 3 

1.2E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

9.2E-0 4 

1.5 E-0 4 

0.0E+0 0 

3.4E-0 5 

. 0.05 5 

0.10 4 

4.3E-1 0 

4 8 

1,93 0 

7 5 

1 5 0 

1,50 0 

101 

9 7 

1 6 2 

3 6 

1,08 0 

2 7 7 

4 4 

4 7 1 

1 0 2 

1.4E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

1.OE-0 3 

2.1 E-0 2 

O.OE+0 0 

2.8E-0 3 

2 . 7 E-0 3 

4.5E-0 3 

1.OE-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

7.7E-0 4 

1.2E-0 4 

0.0E+0 0 

2.8E-0 5 

0.05 0 

0.09 6 

3.8E-1 0 

8 3 

3,00 0 

1 1 7 

2 3 0 

2,27 0 

1 5 4 

1 5 8 

2 4 4 

5 4 

1,65 0 

4 2 6 

6 7 

6 9 0 

1 4 6 

2.2E-0 3 

0.0E+0 0 

1.6E-0 3 

3.1 E-0 2 

0.0E+0 0 

4.1 E-0 3 

4.3E-0 3 

6.6E-0 3 

1.5E-0 3 

O.OE+0 0 

1.1 E-0 3 

1.8E-0 4 

0.0E+0 0 

3.9E-0 5 

0.07 8 

0.15 3 

6.2E-1 0 

(a) . U.S.EPA (1989) Toxic Equivalency Factor 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Field\Unit 4\[m23 Unit4.xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Projecl Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-7 November, 200 2 
WTERNA TfONAL 

Table 2-6 Fixed Hearth Incinerator Unit 4 PCDD/PCDF Emission Results - Congener 

Class Totals 

Run No. 1 2 3 

Date 20/Aug/02 20/Aug/02 21/Aug/02 

Start Time 09:35 14:10 09:45 

Stop Time 

1 Inito: 

12:57 17:43 12:35 

Sample Volume 

\JI//to 

dscf 129.100 126.521 131.163 

Sample Volume m

3 3.656 3.58 3.71 

Moisture Content % v/v 36.3 37.0 36.5 

0 2 Cone. % v/v (dry) 13.5 13.7 13.9 

C 02 Cone. % v/v (dry) 4.7 4.0 4.0 

Isokinetics % 101 101 101 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 16,507 16,173 16,788 

!>: PCDD / PCDF pg/ pg/ pg/ 

Parameters sample ng/m3 sample ng/m3 sample ng/m3 

TOTAL TCDD 1,560 4.3E-01 1,410 3.9E-01 - 2,280 6.1 E-01 

:[•; TOTAL PeCDD 1,680 4.6E-01 1,560 4.4E-01 2,500.0 6.7E-01 

x TOTAL HxCDD 2,280 6.2E-01 2,060 5.7E-01 3,430 9.2E-01 

TOTAL HpCDD 1,280 3.5E-01 1,070 3.0E-01 1,910 5.1 E-01 

OCDD 538 1.5E-01 442 1.2E-01 794 2.1 E-01 

TOTAL TCDF 2,020 5.5E-01 1,930 5.4E-01 3,000 8.1 E-01 

TOTAL PeCDF 1,610 4.4E-01 1,500 4.2E-01 2,270 6.1 E-01 

TOTAL HxCDF 1,210 3.3E-01 1,080 3.0E-01 1,650 4.4E-01 

TOTAL HpCDF 563 1.5E-01 471 1.3E-01 690 1.9E-01 

OCDF 124 3.4E-02 102 2.8E-02 146 3.9E-02 

TOTAL tetra-octa (ng/m3) = 3.5 3.2 5.0 

TOTAL tetra-octa (ng/mJ @ 7 %0 2 ) = 6.6 6.2 9-9 

TOTAL tetra-octa (g/s) = 2.7E-08 2.5E-08 4.0E-08 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Fietd\Unit 4\{m23 Unit4.xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 woriMug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-8 November, 2002 
ENSR. 

WTeKflAT/OflAL 

Table 2-7 Summary of HWC MACT Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 

Low Volatile Metals Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% O, 

Metals Runl Run2 Average 

As 1.62 1.83 1.72 

Be < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.07 

Cr 5.43 7.71 6.57 

Total LVM < 7.12 < 9.61 < 8.36 

LVM Regulatory Standard = 97 micrograms/m3

 @ 7% 02 

Semi-Volatile Metal Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% O i 

Metals Run 1 Run 2 Average 

Pb 4.04 3.72 3.88 

Cd 0.24 0.21 0.22 

Total SVM 4.28 3.93 4.10 

SVM Regulatory Standard = 240 micrograms/m3

 @ 7% 02 

Mercury Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% O 2 

Run 1 Run 2 Average 

< 1296.85 1087.95 < 1192.40 

Mercury Regulatory Standard = 130 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 02 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 wonWAug 02 testing\Field\Unit 4\{m29 Un'it4.xls]EMISSpg3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 2~9 

Report2.doc 

November, 2002 
ENSR. 

Table 2-8 Summary of HWC MACT Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 

Low Volatile Metals Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% O 2 

Metals Runl Run2 Average 

As 3.22 1.72 2.47 

Be < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.07 

Cr 7.43 11.02 9.23 

Total LVM < 10.72 < 12.81 < 11.77 

LVM Regulatory Standard = 97 micrograms/m3

 @ 7% 02 

Semi-Volatile Metal Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% 02 

Metals Run 1 Run 2 Average 

Pb 5.51 8.74 7.12 

Cd 1.79 0.49 1.14 

Total SVM 7.30 9.22 8.26 

SVM Regulatory Standard = 240 micrograms/m3

 @ 7% Q2 

Mercury Emissions 

micrograms/m3 @ 7% 02 

Run 1 Run 2 Average 

1311.80 1314.17 1312.98 

Mercury Regulatory Standard = 130 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 02 

J-Mir_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\FiekJ\Unit 4\[m29 Unit4.x.s]EMlSSpg3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 2-10 

Report2.doc 

November, 2002 
ENSR. 

Table 2-9 Summary of HWC MACT Metals Emissions for Unit 4 

Low Volatile Metals Emissions 

micrograms/m3 (g I 7% 02 

Metals Runl Run2 Runs 3 Average 

As 48.15 37.68 52.13 45.99 

Be < 0.07 < 0.07 < 0.08 < 0.08 

Cr 37.49 38.69 54.08 43.42 

Total LVM 85.71 76.44 106.29 < 89.48 

LVM Regulatory Standard = 97 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 02 

Semi-Volatile Metal Emissions 

micrograms/m3 (5 I 7% 02 

Metals Run 1 Run 2 Runs 3 Average 

Pb 78.93 92.90 137.00 102.94 

Cd 1.60 1.23 6.35 3.06 

Total SVM 80.54 94.13 143.36 106.01 

SVM Regulatory Standard = 240 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 02 

Mercury Emissions 

micrograms/m3 (5 £ 7% Oz 

i ^ K r Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

261.87 368.67 1546.52 725.69 

Mercury Regulatory Standard = 130 micrograms/m3 @ 7% 02 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Field\Unit 4\[m29 Unit4;x!s]EMISSpg3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx . 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-11 November, 2002 
/NT£/!tiaT/ON*t. 

Table 2-10 Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 

R u n No . 

Dat e 

Start Ti m e 

Sto p Ti m e 

Unit s 

R u n 1 

22-Aug-0 2 

08:0 5 

10:1 2 

R u n 2 

22-Aug-0 2 

1 1 :52 

14:1 0 AVG S 

Samplin g Parameter s — 

Barometri c Pressur e 

Volu m e M etere d 

S a m pie Volum e 

M oistur e 

0 2 at Stac k 

Avg . Stac k Temp . 

Stac k Flowrat e 

Isokinetic s 

in. H g 

d c f 

dsc f 

% v/v 

% dr y 

°F 

dscf m 

% 

29.6 0 

93.64 3 

88.54 2 

37. 3 

13.4 0 

3 6 0 

5,74 0 

1 0 7 

29.6 0 

96.00 4 

89.05 1 

33. 3 

12.8 0 

3 6 3 

6,05 3 

1 0 2 

29.6 0 

94.82 4 

88.79 6 

35. 3 

13.1 0 

3 6 1 

5,89 6 

1 04 

A rsen ic CA — 

Quantit y Collecte d 

Stac k Cone . @ 7% 0 2 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e 

L V M 

u g 

MQ/m 3 

Ib/hr 

g/se c 

2.2 0 

1.62 

1.89E-0 5 

2.38E-0 6 

2.7 0 

1.83 

2.4 3 E- 0 5 

3.06E-0 6 

2.4 5 

1.72 

2.16E-0 5 

2.72E-0 6 

Bervlliu m fBe> — 

Q uantit y Collecte d 

Stac k Cone . @ 7% 0 2 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e 

L V M 

p g 

pg/m 3 

Ib/hr 

g/se c 

< 0.1 0 

< 0.0 7 

< 8.58E-0 7 

< 1.08E-0 7 

< 0.1 0 

< 0.0 7 

< 8.99E-0 7 

< 1.13E-Q 7 

< 0.1 0 

< 0.0 7 

< 8.78E-0 7 

< 1.11E-0 7 

Tota ) Chromiu m (Cr ) — 

Quantit y Collecte d 

Stac k Cone . @ 7% 0 2 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e 

L V M 

ug 

pg/m 3 

Ib/hr 

g/se c 

7.3 9 

5.4 3 

6.34E-0 5 

7.99E-0 6 

11.3 9 

7.71 

1.02E-0 4 

1.29E-0 5 

9.3 9 

6.5 7 

8.29E-0 5 

1.04E-0 5 

Cadmiu m fC<n — 

Quantit y Collecte d 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 

Stac k E m issio n Rat e 

S V M 

M9 

Mg/m 3 

Ib/hr 

g/se c 

0.3 2 

0.24 

2.74E-0 6 

3.46E-0 7 

0.31 

0.21 

2.79E-0 6 

3.51 E-0 7 

0.3 2 

0.2 2 

2.77E-0 6 

3.48E-0 7 

Lea d (Pb ) --

Q uantit y Collecte d 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % O z 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e 

S V M 

ug 

pg/m 3 

Ib/hr 

g/se c 

5.5 0 

4.0 4 

4.72E-0 5 

5.94E-0 6 

5.5 0 

3.7 2 

4.94E-0 5 

6.23E-0 6 

5.5 0 

3.8 8 

4.83E-0 5 

6.09E-0 6 

L V M Tota l = 

S V M Tota l = 

pg/ m

 3 

pg/m 3 

.7.1 2 

4.2 8 

9.61 

3.9 3 

8.36 

4.10 

i 02 testing\PieId\U nit 3\IM 29 Unit 3 d .xls]EM IS S pg3 (continued) Pg 1 oT3 

J:V\ir_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-12 November, 2002 
ENvR 

Table 2-10 (Continued) Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 

Run No. 

Date 

Start Time 

Stop Time 

Units 

Run 1 

22-Aug-02 

08:05 

10:12 

Run 2 

22-Aug-02 

11:52 

14:10 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters 

Barometric Pressure 

Volume Metered 

Sample Volume 

Moisture 

02 at Stack 

Avg. Stack Temp. 

Stack Flowrate 

Isokinetics 

in. Hg 

dcf 

dscf 

% v/v 

% dry 

°F 

dscfm 

% 

29.60 

93.643 

88.542 

37.3 

13.40 

360 

5,740 

107 

29.60 

96.004 

89.051 

33.3 

12.80 

363 

6,053 

102 

29.60 

94.824 

88.796 

35.3 

13.10 

361 

5,896 

104 

Mercury ("Hg') — 

Quantity Collected 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 

Stack Emission Rate 

VM 

ug 

pg/m3 

Ib/hr 

g/sec 

1765.1 

1296.8 

1.51 E-02 

1.91 E-03 

1606.9 

1087.9 

1.44E-02 

1.82E-03 

< 1686.0 

< 1192.4 

< 1.48E-02 

< 1.86E-03 

Antimony (Sb) — 

Quantity Collected 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 

Stack Emission Rate 

MO 

pg/m3 

Ib/hr 

g/sec 

0.27 

0.20 

2.32E-06 

2.92E-07 

0.25 

0.17 

2.25E-06 

2.83E-07 

0.3 

0.2 

2.28E-06 

2.87E-07 

Barium (Bal — 

Quantity Collected 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 

Stack Emission Rate 

ug 

pg/m3 

Ib/hr 

g/sec 

29.39 

21.59 

2.52E-04 

3.18E-05 

36.39 

24.64 

3.27E-04 

4.12E-05 

32.9 

23.1 

2.90E-04 

3.65E-05 

Silver (Ag) -

Quantity Collected 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 

Stack Emission Rate 

M9 

pg/m3 

Ib/hr 

g/sec 

< 9.80 

< 7.20 

< 8.40E-05 

< 1.06E-05 

0.39 

0.26 

3.51 E-06 

4.42E-07 

< 5.1 

< 3.7 

< 4.38E-05 

< 5.52E-06 

Thallium (Tl) -

Quantity Collected 

Stack Cone. @ 7% Oz 

Stack Emission Rate 

M9 

pg/m3 

Ib/hr 

g/sec 

< 0.50 

< 0.37 

< 4.29E-06 

< 5.40E-07 

< 0.50 

< 0.34 

< 4.50E-06 

< 5.66E-07 

< 0.5 

< 0.4 

< 4.39E-06 

< 5.53E-07 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 200 2 work\Aug 02 testing\Field\t (continued) P g 2 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 2-13 November, 200 2 

Report2.doc 
EIKR 

MKRf/AT/ONAL 

Table 2-10 (Continued) Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 1 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 

Date 22-Aug-02 22-Aug-02 

Start Time Units 08:05 11:52 

Stop Time 10:12 14:10 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Volume Metered dcf 93.643 96.004 94.824 

Sample Volume dscf 88.542 89.051 88.796 

Moisture % v/v 37.3 33.3 35.3 

Oz at Stack %dry 13.40 12.80 13.10 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 360 363 361 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,740 6,053 5,896 

Isokinetics % 107 102 104 

Nickel (Ni) -

Quantity Collected pg 21.39 31.39 26.4 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 15.72 21.25 18.5 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.83E-04 2.82E-04 2.33E-04 

g/sec 2.31 E-05 3.56E-05 2.93E-05 

Selenium (Se) — 

Quantity Collected pg 1.60 1.70 1.7 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 1.18 1.15 1.2 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.37E-05 1.53E-05 1.45E-05 

g/sec 1.73E-06 1.93E-06 1.83E-06 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Res\0nyx\0nyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Reld\Unit 3\[M 29 Unit 3 c2.xls]DATA Pg 3 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-14 November, 2002 
ENSR. 

Table 2-11 Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 

R u n No . R u n 3 R u n 4 

Dat e 22-Aug-0 2 23-Aug-0 2 

Start Tim e Unit s 15:41 075 2 

Sto p Tim e 17:4 6 095 6 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometri c Pressur e i n . Hg 29.6 0 29.4 5 29.5 3 

Volum e Metere d d c f 93.07 7 94.11 1 93.59 4 

Sampl e Volum e dsc f 86.40 1 88.50 9 87.45 5 

Moistur e % v/v 33. 8 33. 7 33. 8 

0 2 a t Stac k % dr y 13.0 0 13.2 0 13.1 0 

Avg. Stac k Temp . °F 3 8 3 3 8 4 3 8 3 

Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,65 7 5,80 2 5,73 0 

Isokinetic s % 1 0 6 1 0 6 106 

Arsenic (As) — L V M 

Quantit y Collecte d M9 4.5 0 2.4 0 3.4 5 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % O z pg /m3 3.2 2 1.72 2.47 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 3.90E-0 5 2.08E-0 5 2.99E-0 5 

g/se c 4.91E-0 6 2.62E-0 6 3.77E-0 6 

Beryllium (Be) — L V M 

Quantit y Collecte d < 0.1 0 < 0.1 0 < 0.10 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 ug/m 3 < 0.0 7 < 0.0 7 < 0.07 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr < 8.66E-0 7 < 8.67E-0 7 < 8.67E-0 7 

g/se c < 1.09E-0 7 < 1.09E-0 7 < 1.09E-0 7 

Total Chromium (Cr) — L V M 

Quantit y Collecte d P 9 < 10.3 9 15.3 9 12.8 9 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 7.4 3 11.0 2 9.23 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr < 9.00E-0 5 1.33E-0 4 1.12E-0 4 

g/se c < 1.13E-0 5 1.68E-0 5 1.41 E-0 5 

Cadmium (Cd) — S V M 

Quantit y Collecte d pg 2.5 0 0.6 8 1.59 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg /m3 1.79 0.4 9 1.14 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 2.17E-0 5 5.90E-0 6 1.38E-0 5 

g/se c 2.73E-0 6 7.43E-0 7 1.74E-0 6 

Lead (Pb) - S V M 

Quantit y Collecte d p g 7.7 0 12.2 0 9.95 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 5.51 8.7 4 7.12 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e lb/hr 6.67E-0 5 1.06 E-0 4 8.62E-0 5 

g/se c 8.40E-0 6 1.33E-0 5 1.09E-0 5 

L V M Total = pg/m 3 10.7 2 12.81 11.7 7 

S V M Total = pg/m 3 7.3 0 9.2 2 8.26 

I 02 testmg\Field\Unit 3\[M 29 Unit 3 c2.xls]EMlSSpg 3 (continued) Pg 1 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worWAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-15 November, 2002 
ENSR. 

Table 2-11 (Cpntinued) Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 

Run No. Run 3 Run 4 

Date 22-Aug-02 23-Aug-02 

Start Time Units 15:41 0752 

Stop Time 17:46 0956 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.45 29.53 

Volume Metered dcf 93.077 94.111 93.594 

Sample Volume dscf 86.401 88.509 87.455 

Moisture % v/v 33.8 33.7 33.8 

0 2 at Stack % dry 13.00 13.20 13.10 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 383 384 383 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,657 5,802 5,730 

Isokinetics % 106 106 106 

Mercury (Hg) — VM 

Quantity Collected P9 1834.0 1835.1 1834.5 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 . pg/m3 1311.8 1314.2 1313.0 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 1.59E-02 1.59E-02 1.59 E-02 

g/sec 2.00E-03 2.00E-03 2.00E-03 

Antimony (Sb) — 

Quantity Collected M9 0.26 0.16 0.2 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 0.19 0.11 0.2 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 2.25E-06 1.39E-06 1.82E-06 

g/sec 2.84E-07 1.75E-07 2.29E-07 

Barium (Ba) — 

Quantity Collected ug 29.39 41.39 35.4 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 21.02 29.64 25.3 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 2.55E-04 3.59E-04 3.07E-04 

g/sec 3.21 E-05 4.52E-05 3.86E-05 

Silver (Ag) -

Quantity Collected P9 < 5.40 < 6.80 < 6.1 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 < 3.86 < 4.87 < 4.4 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr < 4.68E-05 < 5.90E-05 < 5.29E-05 

g/sec < 5.89E-06 < 7.43E-06 < 6.66E-06 

Thallium (Tl) -

Quantity Collected pg < 0.50 < 0.50 < 0.5 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 0 2 pg/m3 < 0.36 < 0.36 < 0.4 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr < 4.33 E-06 < 4.34E-06 < 4.33E-06 

g/sec < 5.46E-07 < 5.46E-07 < 5.46E-07 

J:\Ai.r_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Ony x 200 2 workAAug 02 testing\FieldU (continued) P g 2 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-16 November, 2002 
Table 2-11 (Continued) Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 3 Condition 2 

Run No. Run 3 Run 4 

Date 22-Aug-02 23-Aug-02 

Start Time Units \ 15:41 0752 

Stop Time 17:46 0956 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.45 29.53 

Volume Metered dcf 93.077 94.111 93.594 

Sample Volume dscf 86.401 88.509 87.455 

Moisture % v/v 33.8 33.7 33.8 

0 2 at Stack % dry 13.00 13.20 13.10 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 383 384 383 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 5,657 5,802 5,730 

Isokinetics % 106 106 106 

Nickel(Ni) -

Quantity Collected M9 34.39 35.39 34.9 

Stack Cone. @ 7% Oz pg/m3 24.6 25.34 25.0 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 2.98E-04 3.07E-04 3.02E-04 

g/sec 3.75E-05 3.87E-05 3.81 E-05 

Selenium (Se) — 

Quantity Collected pg < 1.00 < 1.00 < 1.0 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 

< 0.72 < 0.72 < 0.7 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr < 8.66E-06 < 8.67E-06 < 8.67E-06 

g/sec < 1.09E-06 < 1.09E-06 < 1.09E-06 

J:\Air_ToxVProject Files\Onyx\Onyx2002 workAAug 02 testing\Field\Unit 3\IM29 Unit 3 c2.xls]DATA Pg3 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 lesting\Report\Onyx 2-17 

Repart2.doc 

November. 2002 
ENSR. 

Table 2-12 Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 4 

R u n No . R u n 1 R u n 2 R u n 3 

Dat e 20-Aug-02 20-Aug-02 21-Aug-02 

Star t Tim e Unit s 09:3 5 14:1 0 11:4 3 

Sto p Tim e 12:0 2 16:3 0 14:0 3 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometri c Pressur e in. H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.5 5 29.5 8 

Volum e Metere d d c f 95.25 0 100.90 0 91.33 2 95.82 7 

Sampl e Volum e dsc f 90.22 0 93.31 4 85.49 0 89,67 5 

Moistur e % v/ v 35. 7 30. 7 36. 6 34. 4 

0 2 at Stac k % dr y 13.5 0 13.7 0 13.9 0 13.7 0 

Avg . Stac k Temp . °F 3 7 9 3 8 1 3 9 2 3 8 4 

Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 16,01 0 17,46 2 15,66 1 16,37 7 

Isokinetic s % 1 0 9 1 0 3 1 0 6 1 0 6 

Arsenic (As) — L V M 

Quantit y Collecte d P 9 66.0 0 52.0 0 64.0 0 60.6 7 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 48.2 2 37.7 4 52.1 3 46.0 3 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 1.55E-0 3 1.29E-0 3 1.55E-0 3 1.46E-0 3 

g/se c 1.95E-0 4 1.62E-0 4 1.95E-0 4 1.84E-0 4 

Beryllium (Be) -- L V M 

Quantit y Collecte d p g < 0.1 0 < 0.1 0 < 0.1 0 < 0.1 0 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 0.0 7 < 0.07 3 < 0.08 1 < 0.0 8 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr < 2.35E-0 6 < 2.48E-0 6 < 2.42E-0 6 < 2.42E-0 6 

g/se c < 2.96E-0 7 < 3.12E-0 7 < 3.05E-0 7 < 3.04E-0 7 

Total Chromium (Cr) - L V M 

Quantit y Collecte d p g 51.3 9 53.3 9 66.3 9 57.0 6 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 37.5 5 38.7 5 54.0 8 43.4 6 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 1.21 E-0 3 1.32E-0 3 " 1.61 E-0 3 1.38E-0 3 

g/se c 1.52E-0 4 1.67E-0 4 2.03E-0 4 1.74E-0 4 

Cadmium (Cd) — S V M 

Quantit y Collecte d P 9 2.2 0 1.70 7.8 0 3.9 0 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % O z pg/m 3 1.61 1.2 3 6.3 5 3.0 6 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 5.16E-0 5 4.2 1 E-0 5 1.89E-0 4 9.42E-0 5 

g/se c 6.51 E-0 6 5.30E-0 6 2.38E-0 5 1.19E-0 5 

Lead(Pb) - S V M 

Quantit y Collecte d P 9 108.2 0 128.2 0 168.2 0 134.8 7 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 79.0 6 93.0 4 137.00 . 103.0 3 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 2.54E-0 3 3.17E-0 3 4.08E-0 3 3.26E-0 3 

g/se c 3.20E-0 4 4.00E-0 4 5.14E-0 4 4.1 1 E-0 4 

L V M Tota l = pg/m 3 85.8 4 76.5 6 106.2 9 89.56 

S V M Tota l = pg/m 3 80.6 6 94.2 8 143.3 6 106.10 

j g 02 testing\Field\Unit 4\[m29 Unit4.recal..xls]DATA (continued) Pg 1 of 3 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-18 November, 2002 
ENR 

Table 2-12 (Continued) Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 4 

R u n No . R u n 1 R u n 2 R u n 3 

Dat e 20-Aug-02 20-Aug-02 21-Aug-02 

Star t Tim e Unit s 09:3 5 14:1 0 11:4 3 

Sto p Tim e 12:0 2 16:3 0 14:0 3 . AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometri c Pressur e i n . H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.5 5 29.5 8 

Volum e Metere d d c f 95.25 0 100.90 0 91.33 2 95.82 7 

Sampl e Volum e dsc f 90.22 0 93.31 4 85.49 0 89.67 5 

Moistur e % v/ v 35. 7 30. 7 36. 6 34. 4 

0 2 at Stac k % dr y 13.5 0 13.7 0 . 13.9 0 13.7 0 

Avg . Stac k Temp . °F 3 7 9 3 8 1 3 9 2 3 8 4 

Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 16,01 0 17,46 2 15,66 1 16,37 7 

isokinetic s % 1 0 9 1 0 3 1 0 6 1 0 6 

Mercury (He) — V M 

Quantit y Collecte d u g 359. 0 508. 8 1898. 7 922. 1 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 262. 3 369. 3 1546. 5 726. 0 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 8.43E-0 3 1.26E-0 2 4.60E-0 2 2.23E-0 2 

g/se c 1.06E-0 3 1.59E-0 3 5.80E-0 3 2.82E-0 3 

Antimony (Sb) — 

Quantit y Collecte d p g 2.1 3 1.3 3 2.0 3 1.8 3 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 1.5 6 0.9 7 1.65 1.3 9 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e lb/hr 5.00E-0 5 3.29E-0 5 4.92E-0 5 4.40E-0 5 

g/se c 6.30E-0 6 4.15E-0 6 6.20E-0 6 5.55E-0 6 

Barium (Ba) — 

Quantit y Collecte d p g 38.3 9 38.3 9 49.3 9 42.0 6 

Stae k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 28.0 5 27.8 6 40.2 3 32.0 5 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e lb/hr 9.01 E-0 4 9.50E-0 4 1.20E-0 3 1.02E-0 3 

g/se c 1.14E-0 4 1.20E-0 4 1.51 E-0 4 1.28E-0 4 

Silver (Ae) -

Quantit y Collecte d p g < 10.0 0 < 9.3 0 < 8.6 0 < 9.3 0 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 7.31 < 6.7 5 < 7.0 0 < 7.0 2 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr < 2.35E-0 4 < 2.30E-0 4 < 2.08E-0 4 < 2.24E-0 4 

g/se c < 2.96E-0 5 < 2.90E-0 5 < 2.63E-0 5 < 2.83E-0 5 

Thallium (Tl) ~ 

Quantit y Collecte d p g < 0.5 0 < 0.5 0 < 0.5 0 < 0.5 0 

Stac k Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 pg/m 3 < 0.3 7 < 0.3 6 < 0.41 < 0.3 8 

Stac k Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr < 1.17E-0 5 < 1.24E-0 5 < 1.21 E-0 5 < 1.21 E-0 5 

g/se c < 1.48E-06 . < 1.56E-0 6 < 1.53E-0 6 < 1.52E-0 6 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Ony x 2002 workAAug 02 testing\Field\U (continued) P g 2 of 3 

J;\Air_Tox\Project Fites\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workWig 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-19 November, 2002 
ENSR. 

Table 2-12 (Continued) Summary of Individual Metals Emissions for Unit 4 

Run No. Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 

Date 20-Aug-02 20-Aug-02 21-Aug-02 

Start Time Units 09:35 14:10 11:43 

Stop Time 12:02 16:30 14:03 AVGS 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.55 29.58 

Volume Metered dcf 95.250 100.900 91.332 95.827 

Sample Volume dscf 90.220 93.314 85.490 89.675 

Moisture % v/v 35.7 30.7 36.6 34.4 

0 2 at Stack %dry 13.50 13.70 13.90 13.70 

Avg. Stack Temp. °F 379 381 392 384 

Stack Flowrate dscfm 16,010 17,462 15,661 16,377 

Isokinetics % 109 103 106 106 

Nickel (Ni) -

Quantity Collected ug 29.39 29.39 39.39 32.7 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 21.47 21.33 32.08 25.0 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 6.90E-04 7,27E-04 9.54E-04 7.91 E-04 

g/sec 8.69E-05 9.17E-05 1.20E-04 9.96E-05 

Selenium (Se) — 

Quantity Collected ug 1.50 1.20 < 1.00 < 1.23 

Stack Cone. @ 7% 02 pg/m3 1.10 0.87 < 0.81 < 0.93 

Stack Emission Rate Ib/hr 3.52E-05 2.97E-05 < 2.42E-05 < 2.97E-05 

g/sec 4.44E-06 3.74E-06 < 3.05E-06 < 3.74E-06 

J:\Air_Tox\Projed Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Field\Unit 4\[m29 Unit4.recal..xls]DATA Pg 3 of 3 

J:\Air_Jox\Project Fi1es\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.dcx: 

2-20 November, 2002 
ENSR. 

WUJ.-mUMfMM 

Table 2-13 PM/HCI/CI2 Emission Results for Unit 3 Condition 1 

R u n No . R u n 1 R u n 2 

Dat e 22-Aug-02 22-Aug-02 

Start Tim e Unit s 08:0 5 11:5 2 

Sto p Tim e 10:1 2 14:1 0 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometri c Pressur e i n . H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.6 0 

Volum e Metere d d c f 100.53 5 101.17 4 100.85 5 

Volum e of Ga s Collecte d dsc f 92.90 3 92.17 2 92.53 7 

Moistur e % v/ v 32. 7 36. 9 34. 8 

0 2 at Stac k % dr y 13.4 0 12.8 0 13.1 0 

C 0 2 at Stac k % dr y 4.7 0 4.5 0 4.6 0 

Avg . Stac k Temp . °F 3 5 5 3 5 7 3 5 6 

Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 6,28 9 5,92 6 6,10 7 

Isokinetic s % 9 9 1 0 4 1 0 2 

Particulate Emission Results — 

Fron t Hal f Rins e m g 4 . 0 4 . 2 4.10 0 

Particulat e Filte r m g 1.7 1.6 1.650 

Tota l Particulat e m g 5.70 0 5.80 0 5.7 5 

P M Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 mg/dsc m 3.99 1 3.79 4 3.89 3 

Grai n Loadin g gr/dsc f 0.000 9 0.001 0 0.001 0 

Grai n Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 gr/dsc f 0.001 7 0.001 7 0.001 7 

Grai n Loadin g @ 12 % C0 2 gr/dsc f 0.002 4 0.002 6 0.002 5 

Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 0.05 1 0.04 9 0.05 0 

H C I Emission Results — 

Tota l HC I Detecte d p g 75,00 0 21,00 0 48,00 0 

Tota l HC I Concentratio n p p m 18. 7 5.2 9 12. 0 

Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 34. 5 9 . 0 21. 8 

H C I Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 0.6 7 0.17 9 0.42 5 

C I , Emission Results — 

Tota l Cl 2 Detecte d M9 14,00 0 3,90 0 8,95 0 

Tota l Cl 2 Concentratio n p p m 1.82 0.51 1.17 

Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 3.3 6 0.8 7 1.41 

C l 2 Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 0.12 5 0.03 3 0.07 9 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Field\Unit 3\[m26A Unit 3 c1,xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-21 November, 2002 
ENSR. 

Table 2-14 PM/HCI/CI2 Emission Results for Unit 3 Condition 2 

R u n No . R u n 3 R u n 4 

Dat e 22-Aug-02 23-Aug-02 

Star t Tim e Unit s 15:41 07:5 2 

Sto p Tim e 17:4 6 09:5 6 AVG S 

Sampling Parameters — 

Barometri c Pressur e i n . H g 29.6 0 29.4 5 29.5 3 

Volum e Metere d d c f 101.82 9 98.15 1 99.99 0 

Volum e of Ga s Collecte d dsc f 92.37 8 90.10 1 91.24 0 

Moistur e % v/ v 35. 9 37. 0 36. 4 

O z a t Stac k % dr y 13.0 0 13.2 0 13.1 0 

C O z a t Stac k % dr y 4.5 0 4.8 0 4.6 5 

Avg . Stac k Temp . °F 3 7 7 3 8 1 3 7 9 

Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 5,91 0 5,67 3 5,79 2 

Isokinetic s % 1 0 5 1 0 6 1 0 6 

Particulate Emission Results — 

Fron t Hal f Rins e m g 6.4 4 . 7 5.55 0 

Particulat e Filte r m g 2 . 4 2 . 0 2.20 0 

Tota l Particulat e m g 8.80 0 6.7 0 7.7 5 

P M Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 mg/dsc m 5.88 7 4.7 1 5.30 0 

Grai n Loadin g gr/dsc f 0.001 5 0.001 1 0.001 3 

Grai n Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 gr/dsc f 0.002 6 0.002 1 0.002 3 

Grai n Loadin g @ 12 % C0 2 gr/dsc f 0.003 9 0.002 9 0.003 4 

Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 0.07 4 0.05 6 0.06 5 

H C I Emission Results — 

Tota l HC I Detecte d p g 23,00 0 28,00 0 25,50 0 

Tota l HC I Concentratio n p p m 5.8 7.2 2 6 . 5 

Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 10.1 13. 0 11. 5 

H C I Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 0.1 9 0.23 3 0.21 4 

C I , Emission Results ~ 

Tota l Cl 2 Detecte d M9 5,20 0 3 6 0 2,78 0 

Tota l Cl 2 Concentratio n p p m 0.6 8 0.0 5 0!3 6 

Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 1.19 0.0 9 0.4 3 

C l 2 Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 0.04 4 0.00 3 0.02 4 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Ony x 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Field\Unit 3\[m26A Unit 3 c2.xls]DATA 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 workVAug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-22 November. 2002 
ENKR. 

INTERNATIONAL 

Table 2-15 PM/HCI/CI2 Emission Results for Unit 4 

R u n No . R u n 1 R u n 2 R u n 3 

Dat e 20-Aug-02 20-Aug-02 21-Aug-02 

Star t Tim e Unit s 09:3 5 14:1 0 11:4 3 

Sto p Tim e 12:0 2 16:3 0 14:0 3 AVG S 

Samplin g Parameter s — 

Barometri c Pressur e i n . H g 29.6 0 29.6 0 29.5 5 29.6 0 

Volum e Metere d d c f 90.31 2 92.93 3 93.43 0 91.62 3 

Volum e of Ga s Collecte d dsc f 86.05 5 86.23 4 87.04 4 86.14 4 

Moistur e % v/ v 36. 4 36. 3 36. 8 36. 4 

O z at Stac k % dr y 13.5 0 13.7 0 13.9 0 13.6 0 

C 0 2 a t Stac k % dr y 4.7 0 4.0 0 4.0 0 4.3 5 

Avg . Stac k Temp . °F 3 7 8 3 8 3 3 8 9 3 8 1 

Stac k Flowrat e dscf m 15,93 6 16,06 3 16,05 3 16,00 0 

Isokinetic s % 1 0 4 1 0 4 1 0 5 1 0 4 

Particulate Emission Results — 

Fron t Hal f Rins e m g 27. 1 10. 8 16. 8 18.23 3 

Particulat e Filte r m g 24. 7 23. 6 25. 8 24.70 0 

Tota l Particulat e m g 51.800 0 34.400 0 42.600 0 42.93 3 

P M Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 mg/dsc m 39.679 5 27.016 8 34.079 1 33.59 2 

Grai n Loadin g gr/dsc f 0.009 3 0.006 1 0.007 5 0.00 8 

Grai n Loadin g @ 7 % 0 2 gr/dsc f 0.017 3 0.011 8 0.014 3 0.01 4 

Grai n Loadin g @ 12 % C0 2 gr/dsc f 0.023 7 0.018 4 0.022 6 0.02 2 

Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 1.266 2 0.845 8 1.0371 1.05 0 

H C I Emission Results — 

Tota l HC I Detecte d MS 93,00 0 57,00 0 87,00 0 7900 0 

Tota l HC I Concentratio n p p m 25. 1 15.3 5 23.2 1 21.21 7 

Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 46. 8 29. 4 45. 8 40.68 0 

H C I Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 2.2 8 1.40 4 2.12 2 1.93 5 

C I , Emission Results — 

Tota l Cl 2 Detecte d M9 13,00 0 9,10 0 11,00 0 1103 3 

Tota l Cl 2 Concentratio n p p m 1.83 1.28 1.53 1.54 6 

Cone . @ 7 % 0 2 p p m 3.41 2.4 5 3.0 2 2.96 1 

C l 2 Emissio n Rat e Ib/hr 0.31 8 0.22 4 0.26 8 0.27 0 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 lesling\Fieid\Unil 4\lm26A Unit 4.xlslDATA 

J:\Air_ToxVProject Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

2-23 November, 2002 
ENSR. 

INTERNA TIONAL 

3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

3.1 Sampling Procedures 

Several different sampling and monitoring techniques were used to provide the required data to meet 

the goals of this test program. Two (2) runs each were conducted on Unit 3 at two separate operating 

conditions established by Onyx. Three (3) runs were conducted on Unit 4 at conditions established by 

Onyx. The sampling activities described below were conducted during all runs. All field activities were 

documented in accordance with EPA accepted procedures and copies of all field notes and data 

sheets are included in Appendix A of this report. 

3.1.1 Velocity, Moisture and Fixed Gas Determinations 

Gas stream velocity and temperature were determined in conjunction with each manual sampling 

method. A type "S" pitot tube connected to an inclined water manometer was used to determine 

velocity head of the flue gas at each duct traverse point as specified in EPA Reference Method 2. The 

temperature profile of the flue gas at each duct traverse point was obtained by taking readings with a 

thermocouple and pyrometer concurrent with the velocity head measurements. Moisture content was 

determined as specified in EPA Method 4. Velocity and temperature measurement profiles were 

established prior to testing to aid in sample train set-up. Samples for the determination Of the fixed gas 

composition were collected using the integrated bag technique detailed in EPA Reference Method 3. 

3.1.2 PCDD/PCDF Sampling 

Sampling for dioxins and furans was completed in accordance with EPA Method 23 (40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A). On Unit #4, each sampling run was 3 hours in duration covering 12 sampling points at 

15 minutes per point. On Unit #3, each sampling run was 3 hours in duration covering 12 sampling 

points at 15 minutes per point. 

3.1.3 Metals Sampling 

The EPA Multiple Metals Train (EPA Method 29 as specified in 40 CFR 60 Appendix A) was utilized 

during the testing program for the collection of the following metals: antimony, arsenic, barium, 

beryllium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver and thallium. Each run was 2-hr 

in duration covering 12 sampling points at 10 minutes per point. 

3.1.4 PM/HCI/CI2 Sampling Procedure 

Sampling for particulate matter (PM), hydrogen chloride (HCI), Chlorine (Cl2) was performed in 

accordance with EPA Method 0050 (SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Volume II, 

Test Methods). This procedure allows for the collection of HCI in 0.1 N H 2 S 04 impinger solutions (1s t 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\ReporfiOnyx 3"1 

Reporr2.doc 

November, 2002 
two impingers) and Cl 2 in the final two impingers containing 0.1 N NaOH. Each run was 2-hr in 

duration covering 12 sampling points at 10 minutes per point. 

3.2 Analytical Procedures 

3.2.1 PCDD/PCDF Analyses 

Method 0023 samples were analyzed by EPA Method 8290 (high resolution GC/MS). The train 

fractions recovered for analysis of PCDDs/PCDFs include the front half rinses, the particulate filter and 

the XAD resin trap. The analytical results for each sample fraction were combined into a single 

analytical result for each run. PCDD/PCDF analyses were performed by Alta Analytical Laboratory, 

Inc. in El Dorado Hills, CA. 

3.2.2 Metals Analyses 

Metals analyses for the waste feed samples were completed using two separate procedures. First, 

samples were prepared and analyzed for antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, 

lead, nickel, selenium, silver and thallium as specified in EPA Method 6020 (ICP-MS), SW846, 3r d 

Edition. Mercury was analyzed via method 7471A and Selenium was analyzed by Graphite 

Fumace/Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. Metals analyses were performed by PSC Analytical of 

Burlington, Ontario (Canada). 

3.2.3 PM/HCI/CI2 Analysis 

Sample analysis for particulate matter (PM), hydrogen chloride (HCI), and Chlorine (Cl2) were 

conducted in accordance with EPA Method 0050, with gravimetric analysis for particulate as per EPA 

Method 5 (40 CFR 60,Appendix A). Analysis for HCI and Cl 2 followed EPA Method 9057. This 

analyses was also performed by PSC Analytical Services of Burlington, Ontario (Canada). 

J:\Air__Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 wor1t\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

3-2 November, 2002 
ENSR. 

INTERNATIONAL 

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE 

4.1 Introduction 

This section presents the results of all QA/QC measures implemented during the field sampling 

program and all phases of subsequent analysis. Data generated for the program are judged to be 

valid as overall accuracy and precision results are consistent with general objectives. Analytical 

QA/QC data are presented to support ail sample results used for determining compliance with 

performance criteria or emission standards. 

4.2 Stack Sampling QA/QC 

The stack sampling program incorporated a variety of measures to ensure that sound data would be 

obtained. All samples were collected at the stack sampling locations as planned and in accordance 

with applicable method procedures. One field blank for each incinerator was also submitted for 

analysis along with program samples. 

Sampling QA/QC measure for this program included calibration of all applicable sampling equipment 

used as described below. Field equipment were calibrated according to EPA procedures specified in 

EPA-600/4-77-027b (August 1977) and 40 CFR 60, Methods 1-5, as well as manufacturer's 

specifications. 

1) Dry Gas Meters and Orifice Meters (EPA Method 5 Type) The dry gas meters for all sampling 

trains were calibrated against a wet test meter which had been calibrated against a spirometer. 

The orifice meters were calibrated against the wet test meter and checked against the dry gas 

meter to which they were attached. Meter boxes are calibrated annually and then verified by use 

of the alternative Method 5 post-test calibration procedure. This procedure is based on the 

principles ofthe optional pretest orifice meter coefficient check outlined in Section 4.4.1 of Method 

5. The average Y-value obtained by this method must be within 5% of the initial Y-value. The 

calculations provided with the data sheets in Appendix A show that this criterion was met for all 

isokinetic sampling trains used on the program except Box # 80999. Consequently, a post 

calibration was performed on Box # 80999. The resultant DGM calibration factor and Delta H 

were entered in the isokinetic spreadsheet. Since the sample volume was less using the 

recalibration data, this value was utilized for emission calculations in accordance with the method 

criteria. 

2) 2) Sampling Nozzles. Each glass nozzle is calibrated with a micrometer prior to testing and 

identified with a unique identification number. The internal diameter of each nozzle is measured 

to 0.001 inches along three points of the circumference with a dial vernier caliper and the three 

measurements are then averaged. 

3) Balance. The analytical balance used in the field to determine initial and final silica gel weights is 

calibrated against Class M weights provided by the Mettler Corporation. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Rles\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 tesling\Report\Onyx 4-1 November, 2002 

Report2.doc 
ENSR. 

mre/!A/Ar/oi/Ai. 

4) Thermocouples. Type K thermocouples in each meter control box, heated sample box, impinger 

umbilical connector and sample probes are calibrated against ASTM mercury-in-glass 

thermometers at three points: an ice bath, ambient temperature and a boiling water bath. 

Calibration data are provided in Appendix C. 

5) Pitot Tube. Each S-type stainless steel pitot tube used is designed to meet geometric 

configurations as defined in EPA Method 2. Data sheets are provided in Appendix C. 

4.3 Chain-of-Custody 

Chain-of-custody procedures were followed for all samples as follows: 

• Each isokinetic train was set-up and recovered in a clean area adjacent to the incinerators. 

• Samples were collected, sealed and labeled appropriately. 

• All samples were packed in bubble wrap or other absorbent material and placed in either 

sample coolers or appropriate DOT shipping packages (dangerous goods items). 

• All samples were subsequently shipped via Priority Overnight Fed Ex service to the 

designated laboratory. 

4.4 Analytical QA/QC 

Data Quality Indicators (DQI's) were utilized throughout the program to assess the validity of analytical 

data. This section provides a review of these indicators and the subsequent impact on the analytical 

data. 

4.4.1 Analysis for Metals 

Evaluation of the validity of metals data resulting from the analysis of the Method 0060 sampling train 

samples was based on the following two sets of DQI's: 

• Recoveries of intemal, pre-spike and alternate recovery standards added to the samples prior 

to sampling. Recoveries of these standards are included with other Philip Analytical Services 

data in Appendix D. 

• Results of analyses of field and method blank samples for metals. These results are included 

in Appendix D. 

On the basis of these QC results, no sample analyses were rejected and all the data were determined 

to be valid. Completeness was therefore determined to be 100% for all metals results from all 

samples. 

Data quality indicators (DQIs) were utilized throughout the program to assess the validity of the 

analytical data. This section provides a review of these indicators and the subsequent impact on the 

analytical data. 

J:\Air_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 testing\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

4-2 November, 2002 
4.4.2 Analysis for PCDDs/PCDFs 

Evaluation of the validity of the PCDD/PCDF data resultant from the analysis of the Method 23 

sampling train samples was based on four sets of DQIs. These were: 

a

 Recoveries of internal, pre-spike and alternate recovery standards added to the samples prior to 

sampling. 

« Results of analysis of Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) for the 17 PCDD/PCDF isomers listed in 

EPA Method 23. 

Results of analyses of field and method blank samples for PCDD/PCDFs. 

These results are included with the Alta Analytical Data Report included in Appendix D. Based on 

these QC results, recoveries of two native analytes (2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF and 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF) were 

outside of Alta's limit in the Ongoing Precision and Recovery (OPR) sample. These limits are 

recommended only, and are not designated by the method. No sample analyses were rejected, and 

all data were determined to be valid. 

4.4.3 Analysis for Particulate Matter 

Evaluation of results of gravimetric analysis of Method 0050 samples was based on routine laboratory 

practices and processing of lab blank and field blank samples. Minimal particulate contamination was 

observed in both the lab acetone blank and the field acetone blank sampie, and thus blank correction 

up to the maximum allowed by ttie method (0.01 mg/g) was performed. The blank filter weight was 

within acceptable tolerances and required no blank correction. Additional QC measures followed by 

the gravimetric lab, such as maintenance of proper ambient conditions and use of standard weights, 

ensured valid data. 

4.4.4 Analysis for HCI/CI2 

Evaluation of the validity of analysis of Method 0050 train samples was based on three sets of 

objectives. These were: 

• Results of analysis of blank spikes and matrix spike samples. 

• Results from the duplicate analysis of all samples. 

• Results of analysis of field blank samples. 

An accuracy goal of ±10% is generally established for chlorides in stack sample analyses conducted 

for this type of program. Recoveries for all blank spikes met these criteria. Also, field and method 

blank samples were free of contamination as shown in the table. No sample analyses were rejected, 

and all results were detennined to be valid. Completeness was therefore determined to be 100% for 

all results from the Method 0050 trains for chloride analysis. 

J:\Atr_Tox\Project Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 work\Aug 02 Iesttng\Report\Onyx 

Report2.doc 

4-3 November, 2002 
APPENDIX A 

FIELD DATA SHEETS 

\ 
ENSR. 

INTERNATIONAL 

APPENDIX B 

PROCESS FEED AND OPERATING CONDITIONS 

J:\Air_Tox\Prajecl Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 \rork\May 2002Way 2002 ReporftAppendix Covere.doc November 2002 
UNIT 3 TEST CONDITIONS 

Week of August 19, 2002 

Chlorine- Ibs/hr 

Drum Solids - Ibs/hr 

High Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Low Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Lead in drum solids - Ibs/hr 

Chromium in low Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Mercury in drum solids - Ibs/hr. 

200-25 0 

750 (25lbs/charqe) 

700 

1000 

30 

15 

Rate To Be Determined 

SDA Inlet Temperature -

0

 F 

Run 1 and Run 2 

Run 3 and Run 4 

Lower Chamber Temperature -

0

 F 

Upper Chamber Temperature -

0

 F 

Two Conditions, Two Runs per Condition 

390 

425 

1750 

1900 
UNIT 4 TEST CONDITIONS 

Week of August 19, 2002 

Chlorine - Ibs/hr 

Drum Solids - Ibs/hr 

Bulk Solids-Ibs/hr 

High Btu Liquids in SC C - Ibs/hr 

High BTU Liquids in Kiln - Ibs/hr 

Low Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Lead in drum solids - Ibs/hr 

Chromium in low Btu liquids - Ibs/hr 

Mercury in Drum Solids - Ibs/hr 

Powdered Activated Carbon 

Run 1 - Ibs/hr 

Run 2 - Ibs/hr 

Run 3 - Ibs/hr 

SDA Inlet Temperature -

 0 F 

S DA Outlet Temperature -° F 

Kiln Temperature -

0

 F 

S C C Temperature -° F 

Unit will be conditioned by feeding a 

starting on August 1, 2002. 

250 (all in liquids) 

1500 (25 lbs/charge) 

5000 

800 

400 

750 

30 

15 

P J . 

20 

15 

6 

750 

425 

1850 

1950 

ly 20 lbs. of carbon in the system 
APPENDIX C 

FIELD EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION FORMS 

J:\Air_Tox\Projed Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 worXWug 02 testing\Report\Appendix Covere.doc August 2002 
INTERNA TIONAL 

X 

APPENDIX D 

ANALYTICAL DATA REPORTS 

J:\Air_Tox\Projed Files\Onyx\Onyx 2002 wonVAug 02 testing\Report\Appendix Covers.doc August 2002