alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

June 1, 1944

No. 49452.

#### Protest 101412-K of Darmstadt, Scott & Courtney (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

The testimony fully supports the plaintiff’s contention that the involved merchandise is of much poorer quality and dirtier than flax tow, and that it is used almost exclusively for paper making. The protest wa3 therefore sustained to that extent.
```

[House Document 115-168]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

115th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 115-
168

 
 TERMINATION OF MAURITANIA AS BENEFICIARY UNDER THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND 
                            OPPORTUNITY ACT

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                     THEPRESIDENTOFTHEUNITEDSTATES

                              transmitting

NOTIFICATION OF THE INTENT TO TERMINATE THE DESIGNATION OF THE ISLAMIC 
  REPUBLIC OF MAURITANIA AS A BENEFICIARY SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAN COUNTRY 
  UNDER THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2019, 
 PURSUANT TO 19 U.S.C. 2466a(c)(2); PUBLIC LAW 93-618, SEC. 506A(c)(2) 
    (AS ADDED BY PUBLIC LAW 114-27, SEC. 105(b)(2)); (129 STAT. 366)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

  November 6, 2018.--Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means and 
                         ordered to be printed
                         
                              ______
                              
                U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 
			 
089-011                WASHINGTON : 2018

                         
                         
                         
                                           The White House,
                                      Washington, November 2, 2018.
Hon. Paul D. Ryan,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: In accordance with section 506A(c)(2) of 
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2466a(c)(2)), I am 
providing notice of my intent to terminate the designation of 
the Islamic Republic of Mauritania (Mauritania) as a 
beneficiary sub-Saharan African country under the African 
Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).
    I am taking this step because I have determined that the 
Government of Mauritania has not established, or is not making 
continual progress toward establishing, the protection of 
internationally recognized worker rights, as required by 
section 104 of the AGOA.
    In particular, Mauritania has made insufficient progress 
toward combating forced labor, specifically, the scourge of 
hereditary slavery. Despite intensive engagement with the 
United States, the Government of Mauritania has failed to meet 
critical required benchmarks to address these issues to date.
    Accordingly, I intend to terminate the designation of 
Mauritania as a beneficiary sub-Saharan African country under 
the AGOA as of January 1, 2019. I will continue to assess 
whether the Government of Mauritania is making continual 
progress toward establishing the protection of internationally 
recognized worker rights for potential reinstatement of 
eligibility in accordance with the AGOA eligibility 
requirements.
           
           
           
           Sincerely,

                                                   Donald J. Trump.
                                                   
                                                   
                                                   

                                 [all]
```
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MathStar, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onAugust 14, 2006 (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Douglas M. Pihl, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1.                TheQuarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| August 11, 2006 |   | By     |   | /s/  Douglas M. Pihl                                  |   |
|-----------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|            |   |   |   |  Douglas M. Pihl                                 |
|            |   |   |   |  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 11884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03828]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a $500 million direct 
loan to support the $325 million export of U.S. mining equipment and 
services to mine copper concentrate in Mongolia. The concentrate 
contains approximately 30% copper, and significantly less than 1% of 
gold and silver. The U.S. exports will enable the mine to produce 
828,000 metric tons of copper concentrate per annum on average in the 
early years of production, and 1,796,000 metric tons of copper 
concentrate per annum on average in the later years. Available 
information indicates that the foreign buyer's concentrate output will 
mainly be sold to smelters in China.
    Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction by email 
to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 
442, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of the date this notice 
appears in the Federal Register.

Angela Mariana Freyre,
Senior Vice President and General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-03828 Filed 2-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
# Table 1. Gravity Data

# Format

# Accuracy Codes
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

           AMERICAN AIRCARRIERS SUPPORT, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       Year               Year
                                                                                       Ended             Ended
                                                                                   December 31,       December 31,
                                                                                        1998               1997
                                                                                   -----------        ------------

<S>                                                                                <C>                  <C>
Pro forma data:

Net income as reported                                                             $ 6,764,609          $ 4,073,355
Pro forma income tax expense                                                         2,570,551            1,629,300
                                                                                   -----------          -----------
Pro forma net income                                                               $ 4,194,058          $ 2,444,055
                                                                                   ===========          ===========


Pro forma basic earnings per share                                                    $   0.76             $   0.60
                                                                                      ========             ========
Pro forma diluted earnings per share                                                  $   0.76             $   0.60
                                                                                      ========             ========

Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding:

                                                                                       5,512,533          4,100,000
                                                                                   =============      =============
    Diluted                                                                            5,517,597          4,100,000
                                                                                   =============      =============


</TABLE>
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

B. J. MCELVEEN

NO. 2022 KW 1066

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022

In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs, 

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton

Rouge, No. 09- 18- 0487. 

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., GUIDRY AND WOLFE, JJ. 

STAY LIFTED; WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s

ruling

limiting testimony from the State' s DNA expert and excluding the

lab reports is reversed. No error under the Confrontation Clause

occurs when a DNA expert testifies that in his or her opinion

the DNA profile developed from a sample taken from defendant

matches the DNA profile developed by other, non -testifying

technicians from biological samples taken from the evidence. 

State v. Bolden, 2011- 2435 ( La. 10/ 26/ 12), 108 So. 3d 1159, 1161- 

62 ( per curiam). cf. State v. Oliphant, 2013- 273 ( La. App. 3rd

Cir. 11/ 20/ 13), 127 So. 3d 91 ( the testimony of an alternate

crime lab employee regarding results of DNA analysis, rather

than employee who actually performed the analysis, did not

violate the defendant' s confrontation rights. The crime lab

employee who actually performed the analysis was on maternity

leave and the testifying employee was recognized as an expert in

DNA analysis and admittedly familiar with the protocols and

procedures required of the analysis). Further, the Louisiana

State Police Crime Laboratory scientific analysis reports are

admissible. Even if forensic DNA reports are admitted in

evidence without in -court testimony of the scientist/ analyst who

either signed the certification or performed or observed the

test reported in the certification, generally, there is no Sixth

Amendment Confrontation Clause violation because the reports are

not testimonial. State v. Grimes, 2011- 0984 ( La. App. 4th Cir. 

2/ 20/ 13), 109 So. 3d 1007, writ denied, 2013- 0625 ( La. 10/ 11/ 13), 

123 So. 3d 1216 ( citing Williams v. Illinois, 567 U. S. 50, 132

S. Ct. 2221, 183 L. Ed. 2d 89 ( 2012)). 

VGW

JMG

EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

40 J_ 

Y CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
(V. D. 70)

#### Astra Trading Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 837898.

(Decided March 25, 1958)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Astra Trading Corp.*v. *United States,*39 Cust. Ct. 390, Abstract 61108. The conclusion therein, and the judgment issued pursuant thereto, was to the effect that the protest had been' prematurely filed and the matter was remanded to a single judge in reappraisement to determine the proper dutiable values in the manner provided by law. (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).)

A stipulation of submission, upon which the matter is now before me, establishes that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for each class of merchandise is as follows:

> United States dollars per

> Merchandise each

> 300 pcs. 7 x 50

> Binoculars_ $11. 65

> Carrying cases_ 1. 25

> Net packed

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, John A. Saxton,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert M. Jakobe, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      March 28, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      John A. SaxtonJohn
      A. SaxtonPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      March 28, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      Robert M. JakobeRobert
      M. JakobeExecutive
      Vice President and ChiefFinancial
      Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
(Reap. Dec. 9452)

#### Progressive Color & Chemical Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 836600.

(Decided June 9, 1959)

*Eugene R. Pichrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Goehran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement, consists of Pas Sodium, a coal-tar product, which was appraised on the basis of American selling price, as defined under the provisions of Section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and subject to duty thereunder by reason of Paragraph 28 (c) of the said Act.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the American selling price on the date of exportation for said Pas Sodium as defined under the provisions of Section 402(g) of said Act, is $1.90 per pound, net weight, less 1% packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal for re-appraisement is abandoned as to any other merchandise listed on the invoice, and that this appeal may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts herein, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is $1.90 per pound, net weight, less 1 per centum, packed.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 4.3

     Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on February
29, 2000 designating the Plan as the 1999 Independent Director Share Ownership
Plan and reserving 50,000 shares of Common Stock for grant under it:

               WHEREAS by resolutions adopted on January 19, 1999 and September
          22, 1999 the Board of Directors established a plan for the grant of
          stock options to independent members of the Board of Directors (the
          "Plan");

               NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that such Plan shall be known as
          the 1999 Independent Director Share Ownership Plan; and

               RESOLVED FURTHER that in order to provide flexibility in the
          number of shares to be granted to a new director the Plan is hereby
          amended to permit the issuance under the Plan of such number of shares
          to a new independent director as the Board may deem appropriate (but
          not less than 1,000 shares, or if less, shares having a market value
          of $15,000) provided such grant does not violate the provisions of the
          Plan with regard to the maximum number of shares which may be granted
          under the Plan or to a single director; and

               RESOLVED FURTHER that 50,000 shares of the  Company's $1.00 par
          value Common Stock shall be reserved for issuance under the Plan,
          registered under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-8 and listed on
          the New York Stock Exchange; and

               RESOLVED FURTHER that the officers of the Company are authorized
          and directed to take all such action as may be necessary or
          appropriate in order to carry out the intent of these resolutions.
33930.

#### ANGLIN v. ANGLIN.

Bowles, Justice.

This appeal is brought to review a final judgment and decree granting a divorce to the parties and awarding alimony and child support to the wife.

Appellant filed a petition for divorce, alimony and child support. The divorce was granted by motion upon ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken. The issues of alimony and child support were submitted to a jury, which after trial awarded appellant use of the family home and furnishings until both of the parties’ children reached majority, died or married, and thereafter half of the proceeds from its sale; $85 per month for mortgage payments on the house until the remarriage or death of appellant; an automobile; and fifty per cent of a joint checking account. Appellee was also ordered to pay appellant $35 per week, per child, as child support and to maintain existing dental and health insurance for the children. The verdict was made the judgment of the court.

Appellant complains that the verdict is grossly inadequate to provide for her needs and is contrary to the evidence and principles of law and equity. We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and find that the jury award was reasonable, considering both the needs of appellant and appellee’s ability to pay. The trial court correctly overruled appellant’s motion for new trial. *Thomason v. Thomason,*223 Ga. 90 (153 SE2d 716) (1967).

Appellant also complains of the court’s charge to the jury. Reading the charge as a whole, we find the law to be correctly stated. In any event, appellant did not object to *375the charge or recharge before the jury returned its verdict and will not now be heard to complain. *Sullens v. Sullens,*236 Ga. 645 (224 SE2d 921) (1976); *Mathews v. Penley,*242 Ga. 192 (1978).

Argued September 13, 1978

Decided October 17, 1978.

*G. Hughel Harrison, John F. Doran, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Glyndon C. Pruitt,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 10.7



LOGO



W6316 Design Drive

920-882-5622Greenville, WI 54942

920-882-5814 Fax




June 3, 2004



Employment Agreement

Amendment II

Effective April 25, 2004



Both School Specialty, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the Company) and A. Brett
Pulsipher (Employee) agree, by the below duly executed document, to the below Amendment to section I- Employment and Duties.



Amendment



Section I amended and rewritten to reflect new title and to redefine reporting relationship and in no way alters and or changes any previous amendments or sections of the agreement.



New Section Language



Employment and Duties The Company hereby agrees to employ the Employee and the Employee hereby accepts employment as Executive Vice
President, of Corporate Technology for the Company and agrees to devote his full business time and efforts to the diligent and faithful performance of his duties hereunder the direction of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Such duties
shall be performed in the State of Wisconsin.



In witness whereof, the parties
hereto have amended this agreement as of the late reflective date listed above.



|                                |  |                               
|------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Company: School Specialty, Inc. |  |                               
|                                | 
|June 3, 2004                    |  |                               
|Date                            |  | /s/ David Vander Zanden       
|                                |  | David Vander Zanden, CEO      
|Employee:                       |  |                               
|                                | 
|June 3, 2004                    |  |                               
|Date                            |  | /s/ A. Brent Pulsipher        
|                                |  | A. Brent Pulsipher, Individual
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       (274,124)
<SECURITIES>                                   612,689
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,001,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,822,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,162,924
<PP&E>                                       3,283,992
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,118,061)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,328,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,435,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       816,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,077,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,328,855
<SALES>                                      4,117,510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,134,053
<CGS>                                        3,427,221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,940,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                373,319
<INCOME-TAX>                                   145,594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            227,725
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   227,725
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>