alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# Crucial Conversation:  Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High

By Dawn SuttonDLA Land and Maritime People and Culture Directorate

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Did you miss the highly rated “Crucial Conversation:  Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High” on Aug. 23?  Don’t worry, you can now view it online.

To download the book “Crucial Conversation: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High,” access Skill Soft Books 24x7 through LMS. The book is available as an e-book or audio.

Learn how to speak persuasively, not abrasively, foster teamwork and better decision making, build acceptance rather than resistance and resolve individual group disagreements from guest speaker Ms. Judith Honesty of VitalSmarts. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCommunity L&MCulture L&MCouncils L&MDetachments L&MLeadership Development Association L&MPACER/Intern L&MPersonal Development L&Mmanagement L&MResilency L&MLeadership L&MSupervisors L&MTraining L&M
No. 40419.

#### Protests 877708-G, etc., of J. L. Hudson Co. et al. (Detroit, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2012243EN.01000702.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania), lodged on 22 May 2012 — Călin Ion Plavoșin v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Timiș — Serviciul Soluționare Contestații, Activitatea de Inspecție Fiscală — Serviciul de Inspecție Fiscală Timiș

(Case C-250/12)

2012/C 243/12

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Călin Ion Plavoșin

Applicant:

Defendants: Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Timiș — Serviciul Soluționare Contestații, Activitatea de Inspecție Fiscală — Serviciul de Inspecție Fiscală Timiș

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

In the case where a vendor has been reclassified as a taxable person for VAT purposes and the consideration for (price of) the supply of the immovable property has been determined by the parties, without any reference to VAT, must Articles 73 and 78 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the taxable amount is:

1

| (a) | the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property determined by the parties, less the rate of VAT, or |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property determined by the parties, less the rate of VAT, or

| (b) | the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property agreed by the parties? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the consideration for (price of) the supply of the property agreed by the parties?

---

(1)  Council Directive of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 11 - 00570 - CR

EX PARTE RIGOBERTO T ORRES FARIAS

---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Rigoberto Torres Farias filed a pro se “ Appellant‟s Notice of Appeal in Habeas Corpus” in which he mentioned code of criminal procedure article 11.07 and prayed that “his appeal in habeas corpus

. . . be „granted‟ and without prejudice, as „justice may require‟ issue an order to the District Clerk to transmit a complete trial record to appellant to consider the unresolved claims to the legality of his conviction.” Farias has not provided us with any or der from the trial court.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

On December 28, 2011, we notified Farias of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal and informed him that the appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed

a res ponse with the court by January 9, 2012, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Farias filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. We generally have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant o nly from a judgment of conviction. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.02 (West 2006); McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). We have no jurisdiction over post

- conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony cases, incl uding appeals involving requests for a free record to pursue a post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Cri m. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011 ) ; Peters v. State , No. 02

- 11

- 00230

- C V , 2011 WL 3672035, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Aug. 18, 2011) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )
DELIVERED: February 2 , 2012
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Veterans honored during Memorial Day ceremony at The Crossings at Iron Bridge

By Army Sgt. Saul RosaDLA Aviation public affairs

                Richmond, Virginia  –              

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA AviationMemorial DayDefense Supply Center RichmondThe Crossings at Iron BridgeFort Lee
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1784

In re: GARRY DAVID GALLARDO,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-cv-00106-FPS-JPM)

Submitted: October 19, 2018 Decided: November 1, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Garry David Gallardo, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Garry David Gallardo petitions for a writ of mandamus, asking this court to 

compel the district court “to either award the writ of habeas corpus or issue an order to 

the respondent to show cause why the writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.” 

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). The party seeking issuance of the writ 

of mandamus bears the burden of showing that his right to the writ is clear and 

indisputable. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d at 517 (citations omitted). We conclude that Gallardo 

fails to make this showing. Accordingly, although we grant him leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephen Woodhead, Chief Financial Officer of Desert Sun Mining Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: January 21, 2004



Stephen Woodhead___________

Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of American Physicians
Capital, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: May 9, 2005 /s/
R. Kevin ClintonR. Kevin ClintonPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Frank H. FreundFrank H. FreundSenior Executive Vice President, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer
BARNEY FRANK

4TH DISTRICT, MASSACHUSETTS

2404 RAYBURN BUILDING

WASHINGTON , DC 205 1 5-2 104

(202) 225-5931

29 CRAFTS STREET

NEWTON , MA 02158

(617) 332-3920

Ms. Sandy Cooper

Office-of Energy Efficiency

And Renewable Energy

Mail Station Ee-431

Department of Energy

Washington, D.C. 20585

a^^jin ton,

March 30, 1995

558 PLEASANT STREET

Room 309

NEW BEDFORD , MA 02740

(508) 999-6462

222 MILLIKEN PLACE

THIRD FLOOR

FALL RIVER, MA 02721

(508) 674-3551

89 MAIN STREET

BRIDGEWATER , MA 02324

(508) 697-9403

Dear Ms. Cooper:

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the Department of

Energy's regulation of lighting ballasts under the National

Appliance Energy Conservation Amendments of 1988. I do not

believe that the regulation of lighting ballasts is necessary to

the Department's goals of energy efficiency and conservation.

Unlike several other appliances regulated under the National

Appliance Energy Conservation Amendments, lighting ballasts are

produced chiefly for industrial consumers and not private

consumers. High energy cost alone compels industries to maximize

their energy efficiency, including selecting very high efficiency

magnetic lighting ballasts. Thus, the Department does not need

to regulate lighting ballasts in order to increase industrial

energy efficiency.

Even more significantly, the elimination of magnetic ballasts

would seriously undermine American manufacturing jobs. Unlike

electronic ballasts which are manufactured outside of the United

States, magnetic ballasts are primarily produced in the United

States. We should not further damage already embattled American

manufacturing industries by requiring that their products be

replaced with products manufactured outside of the U.S.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to

your response.

BF/shm

Congr ezz of ite tt

ou t of e re ent tt e

N

THIS STATIONERY PRINTED ON PAPER MADE OF RECYCLED FIBERS

Lamp Ballasts Workshop March 17, 1995 Comment 12
Before the First Division,

November 30, 1945

No. 50726.

#### Protest 58462-K of S. S. Schultz & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial a Government chemist testified that he had analyzed a sample of the merchandise in issue; that it consisted of synthetic phenolic resin cemented to a piece of galalith, the proportions being approximately 80 percent resin'and 20 percent galalith; and that the synthetic resin did not serve as a binding agent. From the record presented and following Abstract 49907, it was held that the mah jong sets in question were properly dutiable as claimed.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > A BLS Reader on Productivity

              																																										United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics.								*A BLS Reader on Productivity : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2171*.															Washington, D.C: 										U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 												June 1983,												https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5226,				accessed on September 25, 2024.										    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1433 

To pay personnel compensation and benefits for employees of the Federal 

Aviation Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2011 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. KERRY, 

Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. WARNER, Mr. BEGICH, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. 

BOXER, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. CARDIN, and Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To pay personnel compensation and benefits for employees 

of the Federal Aviation Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Aviation Em5 ployees Protection Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY FOR PERSONNEL COSTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9502(d)(1) of the Inter8 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘before July 23, 2011,’’; 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1433 IS 

1 (2) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘before 

2 July 23, 2011,’’ after ‘‘incurred’’; 

3 (3) in subparagraph (B)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘heretofore or hereafter’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘before July 23, 2011,’’ after ‘‘in6 curred’’; and 

7 (B) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

8 (iv); 

9 (4) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘.’’ and in10 serting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (5) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(D) incurred under the Federal Aviation 

13 Employees Protection Act of 2011.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall take effect on July 23, 2011. 

16 SEC. 3. USE OF TRUST FUND. 

17 Notwithstanding the expiration of section 48103(8) 

18 of title 49, United States Code, amounts in the Airport 

19 and Airway Trust Fund shall be available to pay personnel 

20 compensation and benefits for employees of the Federal 

21 Aviation Administration funded from appropriations or 

22 authorizations provided on or before July 22, 2011. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
No. 40425.

#### Protest 825036-G/10746 of Swift & Co. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
33915.

#### SNEED v. SCOTT.

Submitted September 12, 1978

Decided October 4, 1978.

*Jerry W. Holladay,*for appellant.

*Webb, Fowler & Tanner, J. L. Edmondson, Jones Webb,*for appellee.

Per curiam.

The appellant father filed a suit for modification of child support based upon a decrease in his income. The trial court found a decrease and reduced the previous award from $200 per month to $180 per month per child. The appellant contends that his income suffered a greater decrease than that found by the trial court. We disagree and affirm.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### James H. HAMMONS v. CITY OF TALLULAH, et al.

No. 98-C-0820.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 8, 1998.

*54In re Hammons, James H.;—Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 30256-CA; Parish of Madison, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 89-121-A.

Denied.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
EX-4.1



 






Exhibit 4.1







	COMMON STOCK S H A R E S SEE REVERSE FOR SH SOI HOLDINGS, INC. CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP
78461E 10 7 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE This Certifies That is the
registered holder of Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Shares of the Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, of SOI HOLDINGS, INC. SOI Holdings, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is a Delaware corporation. The
shares represented by this certificate are transferable only on the stock transfer books of the
Corporation by the holder of record hereof, or by his duly authorized attorney or legal
representatives, upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not
valid until countersigned and registered by the Corporation’s transfer agent and registrar. In
Witness Whereof, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be executed by the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers. BY : DATED: AMERICAN COUNTERSIGNED STOCK AND (New
TRANSFER York, TRANSFER REGISTERED: NY) AGENT & AUTHORIZED AND TRUST SECRETARY PRESIDENT SIGNATURE
REGISTRAR COMPANY






 









 










	SOI Holdings, Inc. The Corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who so
requests the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or
restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Such requests shall be made to the Corporation’s
Secretary at the principal office of the Corporation. The board of directors of the Corporation may
require the owner of a lost or destroyed stock certificate, or such owner’s legal representatives,
to give the Corporation a bond to indemnify it and its transfer agents and registrars against any
claim that may be made against them on account of the alleged loss or destruction of any such
certificate. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable
laws or regulations: TEN COM — as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT—Custodian TEN ENT — as
tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor) JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of under Uniform
Gifts to Minors survivorship and not as Act tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may
also be used though not in the above list. For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE PLEASE PRINT OR
TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE Shares of the Common Stock
represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to
transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation, with full power of
substitution in the premises. Dated: X X The signature(s) to this assignment must correspond with
the name(s) as written Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: upon the face of the Certificate in every
particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever.
No. 54321.

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 155024-K (B), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
#### STATE ex rel. Kenneth VINCENT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 98-KH-2112.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1999.

IN RE: Vincent, Kenneth; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial *647Writ; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “A” Number 281-785; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 98KW-0700, 98KW-1390

Denied.

VICTORY, J. not on panel.