alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Valerie CART and Joseph Cart v. Dr. Laura CASSIDY, et al.

No. 98-CC-0784.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 8, 1998.

In re Cart, Valerie; Cart, Joseph;—Plaintiffs), applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, No. 433,-969; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW97 2617.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, David J. Vander Zanden, President and Chief Executive Officer of School Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 29, 2006 (the Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of School Specialty, Inc.



Date: July 12, 2006



/S/    DAVID J. VANDER ZANDENDavid J. Vander Zanden President and Chief Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1296 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1296

 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond 
 Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI-07 in the State of Rhode Island.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2011

  Mr. Whitehouse (for himself and Mr. Reed) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond 
 Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit RI-07 in the State of Rhode Island.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) Definition of Map.--In this section, the term ``Map'' means the 
map that--
            (1) is subtitled ``Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, Easton Beach 
        Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond Unit RI-06, Hazards Beach Unit RI-07'';
            (2) is included in the set of maps entitled ``John H. 
        Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System'' (referred to in 
        section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 
        3503(a)) as the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier 
        Resources System''); and
            (3) relates to certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
        Resources System units in the State of Rhode Island.
    (b) Replacement.--The Map is replaced by the map entitled ``John H. 
Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Sachuest Point Unit RI-04P, 
Easton Beach Unit RI-05P, Almy Pond Unit RI-06, and Hazards Beach Unit 
RI-07'' and dated September 30, 2009.
    (c) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (b) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
No. 96-5599.

#### Augustine *v.*Roe, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Ben Jamil, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
      Chris R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      February 15, 2008


/s/
                      Ben JamilBen
                      Jamil, Chief Executive Officer
 /s/
                                Chris R. DeckerChris
                                R. Decker, Chief Financial
                                Officer





This
      certification shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Skibski, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ John L. Skibski
-------------------------------------
John L. Skibski
Chief Financial Officer
August 6, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to MBT Financial Corp. and will be retained by MBT Financial Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Antuan Lawrence SCONIERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 98-1195

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 24, 1999.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Rosa C. Figarola, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Simone P. Firley, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and FLETCHER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Antuan Lawrence Sconiers appeals from a revocation of community control. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the revocation, but vacate the sentence imposed and remand for entry of a corrected order of revocation and for resentencing.

Sconiers was charged with three violations of the conditions of his community control: 1) committing an attempted burglary of an unoccupied structure; 2) testing positive for marijuana; and 3) failing to remain confined to his residence on January 7th and February 3rd of 1998. At the violation hearing, the State presented evidence of Sconiers’ drug tests and testimony that Sconiers was away from his residence upon a field visit by his probation officer. In the trial judge’s oral pronouncement at the close of the hearing, he found Sconiers in violation of two of the three charges, and did not find Sconiers in violation with regard to the attempted burglary charge. However, in the written order of revocation, the trial court found Sconiers in violation of the terms of his community control by way of all three charges.

A written revocation order must conform to the trial judge’s oral pronouncements. *See Jimenez v.*State, 698 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Therefore, we remand with directions to the trial court to enter a proper written order that conforms to its oral pronouncements. We *428affirm the revocation, however, because in its'written order, the trial court listed other grounds for revocation; at least one of those is supported by the record.

Because it is not clear whether the trial judge would have imposed the same sentence upon revocation if he had not improperly listed the attempted burglary charge, we vacate the sentence imposed and remand with directions to the trial court to resentence the defendant based upon a proper order of revocation. On remand, the trial court is free to impose the same sentence.

Affirmed in part; vacated in part; remanded with directions.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24265-24266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Antibacterial Resources, Inc. of El Paso, Texas, an exclusive license 
to U.S. Patent No. 5,656,037, ``Reaction Products of Magnesium Acetate 
and Hydrogen Peroxide for Imparting Antibacterial Activity to Fibrous 
Substrates'', issued on August 12, 1997.

[[Page 24266]]


DATES: Comments must be received by June 1, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Antibacterial Resources, Inc. 
of El Paso, Texas has submitted a complete and sufficient application 
for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-
bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 
and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted 
unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, 
the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
 [FR Doc. E7-8365 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
Before the Third Division,

October 8, 1941

No. 46412.

#### Protest 49499-K of Max Koenig & Sons (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the hearing plaintiffs endeavored to prove that the inclusion of this charge was due to a clerical error on the part of the customs broker. The customs broker testified that in making the entry he failed to deduct the nondutiable charges for insurance and consular fee, which failure was probably due to “rush of business, oversight.” It is noted that no claim is made in the pleadings as to the inclusion of the consular fee in the entered value. The importer testified that the customs broker had been given no instructions in regard to making this particular entry. From the record the court found that the plaintiff had not produced proof sufficient to make out a case of clerical error. The protest was therefore overruled. *McQuillan*v. *United States*(18 C. C. P. A. 215, T. D. 44401) and *Yamada*v. *United States*(26 id. 89, T. D. 49826) cited.
EXHIBIT  99.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of Shoreside Investments, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert  M.  Karz,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.



                                   /s/Robert  M.  Karz
                                   -------------------------
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer
                                   March  12,  2002
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Li Xiangqian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of   operations of the Company.

|By: | /s/ Li Xiangqian        | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|    |                         | 
|    | Li Xiangqian            | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | February 16, 2006       | 

---
Exhibit
31
 
 METAPHOR
CORPORATION
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Mark
L. Baum, certify that:
 
 I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB.
 
 Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:
      May 24,
      2005/s/
      Mark L. Baum, Esq.Mark
      L. BaumChairman,
      CEO and CFO
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18786-18787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7391]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Nebraska Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Nebraska Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 2 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 4 p.m. on 
Thursday, April 12, 2012. The purpose of this meeting is to continue 
planning the Committee's civil rights project ``The Civil Rights 
Implications of Nebraska LB 403 To Require Verification of Legal

[[Page 18787]]

Presence in the United States To Receive Public Benefits.''
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: (866) 364-7584, conference call access code number 
56026494. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund 
any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they 
initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number and contact name Farella E. 
Robinson.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Corrine Sanders of the Central Regional Office and TTY/TDD telephone 
number, by 4 p.m. on April 5, 2012.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by May 14, 2012. The 
address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may be emailed to 
frobinson@usccr.gov Records generated by this meeting may be inspected 
and reproduced at the Central Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional Office at 
the above email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, March 23, 2012.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2012-7391 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Donald R. Mayer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.  Date: November 8, 2007/s/ Donald R. Mayer
Donald R. Mayer
Principal Financial Officer
September 17, 1943

No. 48791.

#### Protests 961613-G, etc., of Tillotson Clay Products Co.

C. D. 786. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
No. 96-5756.

#### Armendariz-Mata *v.*Department of Justice et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.