alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

# SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2002, I, Michael J. Schuh, Chief Financial Officer of SonoSite, Inc.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | such
Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of SonoSite, Inc.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Michael J. Schuh

Michael J. SchuhVice President-Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 28, 2003
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1421 KA 07-02437
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSEPH EDWARDS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (WILLIAM G. PIXLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered November 9, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [2]) and endangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury ( see People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally People v Bleakley , 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant’s objection to the testimony of the victim’s half-sister on the ground that it was speculative and irrelevant did not preserve for our review his present contentions that such testimony improperly bolstered the victim’s credibility ( see People v Valentine , 48 AD3d 1268, 1268-1269, lv denied 10 NY3d 871), and exceeded the scope of the prompt outcry exception to the hearsay rule ( see People v Stearns , 72 AD3d 1214, 1218, lv denied 15 NY3d 778). We decline to exercise our power to review those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]).

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6060.

Invoices dated Sonneberg, Germany, September 9, 1939.

Certified September 14, 1939.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., October 13, 1939, etc.

Entry No. 1302/1, etc.

(Decided October 17, 1944)

*Sharreits & Hillis (Edward P. Sharreits*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> *382It is hereby stipulated, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the. court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission in the cases listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with *“xx”*in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, are in all material respects the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraisements 113038-A, 113040-A, and 113468-A of the F. W. Woolworth Co. and passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman*& *Co., Rice & Co. Corp., Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> It is further stipulated and agreed, that on the dates of exportation of the merchandise involved in the cases listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal'markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus 3J4 per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeals are abandoned.

> It is further stipulated and agreed, that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeals to reappraisement are submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoices by the items marked “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles II. Ritz, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus *3}{*per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
^OT-OST-' ^O0(- fOd ^ 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Monday, April 18, 2011 11:24 AM 

'Erick Dahl' . 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

RE: EAS Bid 

"0 

• ..J *i ' — ! 

Erick, 

Consider this e-mail the granting of your request. 

Dennis 

From: Erick Dahl [mailtoiairporttgjwatertownsd.usi 

Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 11:07 AM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Cc; Martin, Michael (OST) 

Subject: RE: EAS Bid 

Dear Mr. DeVany, ' ' ' . . ~~ 

The City of Watertown is requesting a two week extension to the comment period to allow the EAS proposals 

to be reviewed by the City of Watertown City Council and Airport Board. A recommendation will be provided by the City 

as soon as these government bodies have had a chance to comment. 

Thank you. 

Erick Dahl 

Airporl Manager 

.'ew.k: 605-882-6209 

tobiie: 605-868-9179 

*-:, 605-882-5285 

SPVT 

m\.''\ 

^.'?l A;fport@watertownsd.us 

' Erick Dahl@HolmaH.com (MSN) 

City of Watertown 

2416 Boeing Ave. 

Watertown, SD 57201 USA 

.MTN: Aifpoil Manjoer 

From: Denn(s.DeVanv(a)dot.qov rma(l(:o:Denni5.DeVany(a)dot.qov"l 

Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 9:09 AM 

To: airportO watertownsd. us 

Cc: Michael.F.Martin@dot.qov 

Subject: RE: EAS Bid 

That would be fine. 

From: Erick Dahl rmai)to:airDort(S]watertown5d.U5l 

Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 10:08 AM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: EAS Bid 

Dennis, 
City would like to know your thoughts on a two week comment extension to allow the issue to be brought in front on 

the airport and city boards for conversation. If you would be so inclined to approve I would formally request it in a more 

professional looking email. 

Thank you. 

Also, as an aside, what would you think about an extension of the current contract until the government actually 

approves an FAA reauthorization bill? You know an extension till at least the end of the world in 2012.... 

•'••>k 605-882-6209 

cinie: 605-868-9179 

i/ 605-882-5285 

iM Airport@watertownsd.us 

Erick Dahl@HotmaH.com (MSN) 

City of Watertown 

2416 Boeing Ave. 

Watertown, SD 57201 USA 

ATTN- Aifpoft MrtHciger
#### John WARDA, Appellant, v. Marty C. ANDERSON, Warden, Appellee.

No. 04-2729.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted July 29, 2005.

Decided Aug. 8, 2005.

John Warda, Sandstone, MN, pro se.

Erika Mozangue, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate John Warda challenges the district court’s* dismissal of Warda’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged the loss of good-time credits and other sanctions following a disciplinary determination he had possessed contraband. We affirm.

Contrary to Warda’s argument, due process requires only the existence of “some evidence” to support the revocation of good-time credits. *See Superintendent v. Hill,*472 U.S. 445, 455, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985) (due process requirements satisfied if “some evidence” supports decision to revoke good-time credits). Having reviewed the district court’s findings for clear error, we conclude the record supports the court’s determination the disciplinary decision was based on some evidence. *See Hayes v. Long,*72 F.3d 70, 72 n. 2 (8th Cir.1995). Among other things, the hearing officer considered an incident report describing how a cooler with Warda’s name on it and containing contraband was found under his bed during a search of his cubicle. The officer also considered a memorandum which stated an FBI special agent had interviewed Warda and Warda’s cubicle-mate, and had determined the items belonged to Warda.

Warda also argues the district court should have independently evaluated the *726credibility of the confidential informant (Cl) whose information was considered by the hearing officer, but this argument fails because “some evidence” other than the Cl information supports the disciplinary decision. *See Hill,*472 U.S. at 455-57, 105 S.Ct. 2768; *Espinoza v. Peterson,*283 F.3d 949, 952 (8th Cir.) (reviewing court must examine reason for non-disclosure and reliability of Cl only in cases where Cl information is needed to satisfy “some evidence” standard), *cert. denied,*537 U.S. 870, 123 S.Ct. 277, 154 L.Ed.2d 119 (2002).

Given the existence of some evidence to support the disciplinary determination, Warda’s remaining arguments about application of the constructive-possession rule and certain allegedly erroneous factual determinations are meritless.

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

 The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
### Underground waters of Salt River valley, Arizona

By: Willis Thomas Lee

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp136

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 7**                            (2865 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 20**                            (2329 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 30, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-61057 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BRAD BINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:03-CR-31-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Brad Bingham pleaded guilty to two counts of distribution in excess of 50 grams of methamphetamine. The district court sentenced Bingham to concurrent terms of 97 months in prison for each of the two counts of conviction. The district court also imposed concurrent five-year terms of supervised release. Bingham, proceeding pro se , appeals his sentence.No. 03-61057 -2- Bingham argues that the district court erred in considering the amounts of narcotics listed in the dismissed counts of the indictment as relevant conduct to his methamphetamine trafficking offenses. The district court may consider drug offenses not specified in the count of conviction if they are part of the same course of conduct or part of a common scheme or plan. United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 118 (5th Cir. 1995); U.S.S.G. §§ 1B1.3(a)(2), 2D1.1, comment. (n.12). Because all of the narcotics trafficking occurred within a six week period, Bingham has not demonstrated that the district court clearly erred in including all of the dismissed counts as relevant conduct. United States v. Ocana , 204 F.3d 585, 589-90 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. McCaskey , 9 F.3d 368, 372 (5th Cir. 1993). Bingham argues that a single criminal history point should be deleted because the original presentence report (PSR) did not verify that he was represented by counsel with regard to the misdemeanor conviction. See United States v. Morrow , 177 F.3d 272, 305 (5th Cir. 1999). At sentencing, the district court found that court records showed that Bingham was represented for the March 25, 1997, conviction. Bingham does not assert that he was not represented, he simply argues that the court records cannot be verified independently. This is not sufficient to show that the district court was clearly erroneous in finding thatNo. 03-61057 -3- Bingham had been represented in the proceeding in question.
See McCaskey , 9 F.3d at 372. Bingham argues that the district court erred when it failed to reduce his sentence under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, the “safety valve” provision. As discussed above, the district court did not err in finding that Bingham had two criminal history points. Bingham was disqualified by § 5C1.2(a)(1) from receiving a safety valve reduction. United States v. Flanagan , 87 F.3d 121, 124-25 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.
### Ground water in the High Plains of Texas

By: W. N. WhiteW. L. BroadhurstJoseph W. Lang

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp889F

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The High Plains of Texas occupy an area of about 35,000 square miles, extending from the northern boundary of the Panhandle southward about 300 miles, and from the New Mexico line eastward an average distance of about 120 miles. This region is divided into two segments by the Canadian River and the name Llano Estacado has usually been assigned by geologists to the southern, or larger part, which is bounded on the east and on the west by the escarpments of the High Plains and on the north by the valley of the deeply entrenched Canadian River. The ground water occurs chiefly in the beds of sand in the Ogallala formation, which underlies the surface throughout almost the entire region and in many places is 200 to 300 feet thick. It rests on an uneven floor of older rocks, which are exposed at the base of the escarpments bounding the High Plains and in the Canadian "River Valley. If water is found in them it is generally highly mineralized. As the water-bearing sands of the Ogallala are cut off in all directions by escarpments, they have no underground connections with water-bearing beds outside of the area except through the underlying older rocks, which contain highly mineralized water and could not be the source of the fresh water in the Ogallala. The source of this fresh water, therefore, must be the rain and snow that fall on the surface of the High Plains.

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stan Bharti, Chief Executive Officer of Desert Sun Mining Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 13, 2004



Stan Bharti___________

Chief Executive Officer
No. 39120.

#### Protests 877773-G, etc., of Angel Suarez & Hnos, Inc. (San Juan).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
### Bentonite deposits of the Yellowtail district, Montana and Wyoming

By: Maxwell M. KnechtelSam H. Patterson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir150

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **1**                            (1434 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Derrick Ramon THIGPEN, a/k/a Pookie, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-6464.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 22, 2005.

Decided: Sept. 16, 2005.

Derrick Ramon Thigpen, Appellant pro se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*549PER CURIAM:

Derrick Ramon Thigpen seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and denying his subsequent motion to reconsider pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thigpen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Thigpen’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*