alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                      <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998              DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998              MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         14,624                        1
<SECURITIES>                                   10,311                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 115,527                  154,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                    5,291                    5,359
<INVENTORY>                                         0                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              140,621                  153,774
<PP&E>                                         56,202                   53,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                 35,484                   35,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                257,619                  208,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          93,497                   77,215
<BONDS>                                       156,055                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                        0
<COMMON>                                          313                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                      7,754                  118,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  257,619                  208,186
<SALES>                                        48,643                   38,580
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               86,528                   69,127
<CGS>                                          21,779                   14,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  36,505                   28,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               80,958                   33,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  181                      337
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (21,242)                    6,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (9,090)                    2,473
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (12,152)                    4,179
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                        0
<CHANGES>                                           0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (12,152)                    4,179
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.39)                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.39)                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of ABCI Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Baum, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 Dated this August 18, 2004   /s/ Mark Baum
 Mark L. Baum,
 CEO
 
 
 Dated this August 18, 2004   /s/ Mark Baum
 Mark L. Baum,
 CFO
No. 50696.

#### Protest 115192-K of American Radio Hardware Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

An examination of the entry papers failing to disclose anything sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1323 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 93
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1323

To express the sense of the Senate on shared sacrifice in resolving the 
                            budget deficit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 2011

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  ordered to be placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To express the sense of the Senate on shared sacrifice in resolving the 
                            budget deficit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON SHARED SACRIFICE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The Wall Street Journal reports that median pay for 
        chief financial officers of S&P 500 companies increased 19 
        percent to $2,900,000 last year.
            (2) Over the past 10 years, the median family income has 
        declined by more than $2,500.
            (3) Twenty percent of all income earned in the United 
        States is earned by the top 1 percent of individuals.
            (4) Over the past quarter century, four-fifths of the 
        income gains accrued to the top 1 percent of individuals.
    (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that any 
agreement to reduce the budget deficit should require that those 
earning $1,000,000 or more per year make a more meaningful contribution 
to the deficit reduction effort.
                                                        Calendar No. 93

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1323

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To express the sense of the Senate on shared sacrifice in resolving the 
                            budget deficit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 30, 2011

          Read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6105

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MARVIN MARCO GRAHAM, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00002-GCM-1; 3:07-cv-00417-GCM)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 29, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin Marco Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marvin Marco Graham seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion to vacate. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). “A denial of a motion to amend a complaint is not a final order, nor is it an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.” Bridges v. Dep’t of Md.

State Police , 441 F.3d 197, 206 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Ben
      Jamil, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc.;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      May
      15, 2008




/s/
                Ben JamilBen
                Jamil, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  300,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,454)
<INVENTORY>                                    119,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               454,668
<PP&E>                                         833,428
<DEPRECIATION>                               (397,654)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,283,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          219,517
<BONDS>                                        413,797
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,764
<OTHER-SE>                                     514,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,283,697
<SALES>                                      1,145,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,145,953
<CGS>                                          787,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,029,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   270
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,350
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,610
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,610
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34


</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

May 18, 1950

No. 54330.

#### Simon Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 155603-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### Salt-water encroachment, geology, and ground-water resources of Savannah area, Georgia and South Carolina

By: H. B. CountsEllis Donsky

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1611

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Ground-water investigations in the Savannah area, Georgia - South Carolina(1949)                                    

                                        Results of chloride determinations of water samples from observation wells in the Savannah area, Georgia, October 1952(1952)                                    

                                        A summary of the artesian-water resources in the Savannah area, Georgia, and an outline of additional studies needed(1955)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
January 23, 1940

No. 43141.

#### Protest 904195-G of International Forwarding Co., Inc. (Ozalid Corporation).

C. D. 266. Application by plaintiff for rehearing denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 10.23

                AMENDED AND RESTATED NON-RECOURSE PROMISSORY NOTE


$479,880                                                      Reykjavik, Iceland
                                                                  March 24, 1999

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby unconditionally promises to
pay to the order of deCODE genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), at the Company's principal office or at such other place as the
holder hereof may designate in writing, on 1 February, 2003, in lawful money of
the United States of America and in immediately available funds, the total price
of 479,880 Dollars ($479,880), together with interest, compounded annually,
from 16 November, 1998 on the unpaid principal at the rate of 6% per annum.

         This Note may not be prepaid.

         The full amount of this Note is secured by a pledge of shares of Common
Stock of the Company, and is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the
Amended and Restated Early Exercise Stock Purchase Agreement and the Amended and
Restated Pledge Agreement, each of even date herewith between the undersigned
and the Company. The Company's recovery against the undersigned for failure to
pay any amount owing hereunder when due shall be limited solely to the shares of
Common Stock or other collateral of the undersigned pledged to the Company in
the Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement. The undersigned shall not be liable
or have any personal liability in any other respect for the payment of any
amount due under this Note.

         The undersigned hereby represents and agrees that the amounts due under
this Note are not consumer debt, and are not incurred primarily for personal,
family or household purposes, but are for business and commercial purposes only.

         The undersigned hereby waives presentment, protest and notice of
protest, demand for payment, notice of dishonor and all other notices or demands
in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or endorsement
of this Note.

         This Note shall be governed by, and construed, enforced and interpreted
in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, excluding conflict of
laws principles that would cause the application of laws of any other
jurisdiction.


<PAGE>   2




         This Amended and Restated Non-Recourse Promissory Note reflects
amendments to the Non-Recourse Promissory Note delivered to the Company by the
undersigned on 16 November, 1998, which amendments were agreed upon between the
Company and the undersigned on March 24, 1999. It supersedes and replaces in all
respects such Non-Recourse Promissory Note.

                                            /s/    Sigurdur I. Bjornsson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                       (signature)

                                                   Sigurdur I. Bjornsson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                      (print name)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Order Granting Motion to Dismiss by Stipulation Page 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Consolidate Cause No. DA 22-0036

STEVE FLETCHER,

 Plaintiff and Appellee, 

 vs.

DONALD R. BARBA and CITY OF

MISSOULA

 Defendants and Appellants, 

KINGDOM BUILDERS, INC.; MIKE

MORGAN and EMETT ANDERSON

dba HOFFMAN MORGAN &

ASSOCIATES;, 

 Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS BY STIPULATION

UPON REVIEW of Donald Barba’s and City of Missoula’s Motion to Dismiss

by Stipulation and good cause shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the above cause matter is dismissed. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2022

04/29/2022
#### Cesar Naar RAFFIN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73535.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 11, 2005.*

Decided July 21, 2005.

*27James L. Rosenberg, Esq., Law Offices of James L. Rosenberg, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See**27Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Cesar Naar Raffin, a native and citizen of Argentina, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture, and his motion for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.

“Where, as here, the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision while adding its own reasons, we review both decisions.” *See Kataria v. INS,*232 F.3d 1107, 1112 (9th Cir.2000). The court reviews claims of due process violations de novo. *Reyes-Palacios v. INS,*836 F.2d 1154, 1155 (9th Cir.1988). The court reviews the decision to deny a continuance for abuse of discretion. *Baires v. INS,*856 F.2d 89, 91 (9th Cir.1988).

We conclude that the IJ’s denial of a continuance did not violate Raffin’s right to obtain counsel because Raffin waived his right to counsel at his hearing. *Cf. Reyes-Palacios,*836 F.2d at 1155. Furthermore, we conclude that the IJ’s denial of a continuance did not constitute an abuse of discretion, because Raffin had been granted two continuances, and because he was able to present his asylum *28claim. *Cf. Rios-Berrios v. INS,*776 F.2d 859, 862-63 (9th Cir.1985).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 99.5



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Stephen Woodhead, Chief Financial Officer of Desert Sun Mining Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. This Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated  March 27, 2006







/s/ Stephen Woodhead

Stephen Woodhead

Chief Financial Officer