alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15



Private & Confidential



Dr I McRobbie

[personal address information]



1st December 2010



Dear Ian



On behalf of the Board of Directors, I am delighted to confirm that the Board have decided to award you a special one off bonus to show their appreciation of what has been accomplished and the loyalty you
have shown to the Company over what has been an extended and testing period in the Companys history. The Board anticipates your continued loyalty and endeavour over the coming period as we grow the business both geographically and by
acquisition.



The main elements of this bonus are as follows:-



|1. | You will receive a one off bonus payment of $175,000. This will be paid in January 2011 using the relevant exchange rate at the time.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | You are required to use 1/3 of this bonus, after tax, to purchase Innospec stock in the open market. This should be done in the first stock trading window after you
receive this payment. Please make sure you let Nicola Earl in Ellesmere Port have the details of your stock purchase so the necessary filings can be completed.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | You will be required to hold the stock purchased in point 2 above for a minimum of 1 year.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | If you decide to end your employment with Innospec of your own accord, within two years of receiving this bonus, the Company reserves the right to require you to repay
some or all of this bonus payment. Any such repayment will be at the absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board and you will be notified of their decision in writing.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Please sign the attached copy of this letter and return to Cathy Hessner in
Ellesmere Port, to confirm your acceptance of the above terms.



On
behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your contribution and loyalty to our company to date and to wish you continued success in the future as we focus on driving the business forward.



Kind regards

|              
|--------------
|/s/    BOB
BEW
|Bob Bew       
|Chairman
(Reap. Dec. 9023)

Entry No. 19751.

#### John A. Conkey & Co., a/c Gillespie-Rogers-Pyatt Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided November 27, 1957)

*Henry L. Ziegel*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *(Murray Sklaroff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

This cause of action involves the question of the proper dutiable value of certain mica splittings covered by the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement.

*699When the case was called for hearing, the parties entered into a stipulation of fact whereby it was agreed that export value was the proper basis of appraisement for the involved merchandise and that said value on the date of exportation was one rupee per pound, f. o. b. Calcutta.

Upon the agreed statement of fact, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is one rupee per pound, f. o. b. Calcutta.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                       Certification Furnished Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Unifab International,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, who is the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

                                              /s/ William A. Hines
                                              ------------------------
                                              Name:  William A. Hines.
                                              Title: Principal Executive Officer
                                              Date:  May 14, 2004

                                       24
DONALD JACKSON

,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF POMPANO BEACH

and CORVEL CORPORATION

,

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 929

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 16, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims

. Marjorie Renee Hill , Judge

.

Date of Accident: August 7, 2013.

Michael J. Winer of the Law Office of Michael J. Winer, P.A., Tampa ; Ricardo

Morales of the Law Office of Ricardo Morales, PLC, Miami , for Appellant.

Albert P. Massey, III

, and Darrel T. King of the Law Offices of Massey, Coican &

King, L.L.C., Fort Lauderdale , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 4.1

COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE

 PAR VALUE $0.01

NUMBER ______   SHARES _____

ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT ___________ IS THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF ________ SHARES

FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK OF ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS
, INC.

TRANSFERABLE ONLY ON THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION BY THE HOLDER HEREOF IN PERSON
OR BY ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.  IN WITNESS
WHEREOF,  THE SAID  CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS  CERTIFICATE TO BE SIGNED BY ITS
DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS AND ITS CORPORATE SEAL TO BE HEREUNTO AFFIXED THIS ____
DAY OF ______, 19____.

ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.   CORPORATE SEAL 1997 DELAWARE

SECRETARY      PRESIDENT
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2878-2879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-920]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[IL228-2; FRL-8272-7]


Notice of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Final 
Determination for Indeck-Elwood, LLC

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of withdrawal action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that EPA is withdrawing the Notice of 
Final Agency Action of November 22, 2006 (71 FR 67560), for the Indeck-
Elwood, LLC Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit, 
because the Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) remanded the permit in 
part. On September 27, 2006, the EAB of the EPA denied in part, and 
remanded in part, a petition for review of a federal PSD permit issued 
to Indeck-Elwood, LLC by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. 
According to 40 CFR part 124, a final permit decision shall be issued 
by the Regional Administrator when the EAB issues a decision on the 
merits of the appeal and the decision does not include a remand of the 
proceedings. Because the EAB's decision on this permit appeal included 
a partial remand, there is not yet a final agency action subject to 
review.

[[Page 2879]]


ADDRESSES: The documents relevant to the above action are available for 
public inspection during normal business hours at the following 
address: Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard (AR-18J), Chicago, Illinois 60604. To arrange viewing of 
these documents, call Constantine Blathras at (312) 886-0671.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constantine Blathras, Air and 
Radiation Division, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard (AR-18J), Chicago, Illinois 
60604. Anyone who wishes to review the EAB decision can obtain it at 
http://www.epa.gov/eab/ eab/.

    Dated: January 17, 2007.
Bharat Mathur,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 5.
 [FR Doc. E7-920 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.1


    Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
      required by Rule 13a - 14(b) or Rule 15d - 14(b) of the Exchange Act


     The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with AES Red Oak L.L.C`s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") for purposes of
complying with Rule 13a -14(b) or Rule 15d - 14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code.

     A. W. Bergeron, the President and Pam Strunk, the Chief Financial Officer
of AES Red Oak, L.L.C., each certifies that, to the best of his or her
knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of AES Red Oak, L.L.C.


                                        /s/ A.W. Bergeron
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Name: A.W. Bergeron
                                        President


                                        /s/ Pam Strunk
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Name: Pam Strunk
                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### Ellis China Co., Inc. (Meadows Wye & Co., Inc.) *v.*United States

No. 6454.

Entry Nos. 752449; 709700.

Invoices dated Longton, England, March 1946, etc.

Certified March 18, 1946, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., April 15, 1946, etc.

(Decided October 24, 1946)

*Benjamin A. Levett*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto :

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, James A.Rotherham,  C.P.A., Chief FinancialOfficer of Kintera, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 

 

Dated: May 17, 2004

 

 
| /s/ James A.  Rotherham, C.P.A. |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| James A.  Rotherham, C.P.A.     |
| Chief  Financial Officer        |
| (Principal  Financial Officer)  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Kintera and will be retained by Kintera and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Richard Davidson, Chief Financial Officer of
Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2008            
|                             
|/s/ Richard Davidson         
|Richard Davidson             
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 53815.

protest 146626-K (New York).

#### Dudley T. Bloodgood *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on behalf of the importer. An examination of the record indicated that the importer failed to file a certificate of outward manifest or any other evidence as to the existence of all the facts upon which free entry is dependent. In view of the noncompliance with mandatory regulations, the protest was overruled, following *Maple Leaf Petroleum, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 C. C. P. A. 5, T. D. 48976).
Motion Denied and Order filed February 20, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00838-CV

____________

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF GARY STEVEN ACKLEN, II 

AND SANDRA EDWARDS ACKLEN

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-FD-2341

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was originally due November 6, 2019. See

Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. This court granted the court reporter’s last request for 

extension of time to file the record until February 3, 2020. The court reporter,

Lynnette Erksine, was informed that no further extension would be entertained 

absent exceptional circumstances. On February 3, 2020, the court reported filed a 

request for extension of time until March 15, 2020. The court DENIES the request 

and issues the following order.
We order Lynnette Erksine, the court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The trial and appellate courts are 

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Lynnette Erksine does not timely file the record as ordered, 

the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.
Exhibit 12(a)

                             BNP U.S. FUNDING L.L.C.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                          (in thousands, except ratios)



                                                  For the Year Ended
                                                   December 31, 2004
                                                   -----------------

Net income                                            $   23,365
                                                        ========
Fixed charges:
      Audit fees                                              51
      Trustee fees                                           119
      Administrative and consulting fees                   1,157
                                                           -----
Total fixed charges                                        1,327
                                                           -----
Earnings before fixed charges                          $  24,692
                                                         -------
Fixed charges, as above                                    1,327
                                                           -----
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                         18.61
                                                           -----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26150-26151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[OR-130-1020-ML; GP7-0117]


Notice of Public Meeting, Eastern Washington Resource Advisory 
Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S.

[[Page 26151]]

Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Eastern 
Washington Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The Eastern Washington Resource Advisory Council will meet 
Friday, June 1, 2007 at the Odessa Fire Station, 1 Division St., 
Odessa, WA, 99159.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will start at 9 a.m., adjourn at 
approximately 11 a.m., and will be open to the public. There will be an 
opportunity for public comments at 9:30 a.m. The Council will discuss 
proposals for development of motorized routes on public lands in the 
vicinity of Odessa, WA. After the meeting, the Council will visit the 
area where these trails are being proposed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Pavey or Sandie Gourdin, Bureau 
of Land Management, Spokane District Office, 1103 N. Fancher Road, 
Spokane Valley, WA 99212-1275, or call (509) 536-1200.

    Dated: May 2, 2007.
Robert B. Towne,
District Manager.
 [FR Doc. E7-8754 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
# C_2016305EN.01003301.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2016 — Fruit of the Loom v EUIPO — Takko (FRUIT)

(Case T-431/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark FRUIT - Genuine use of a mark - Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - External use of the mark))

(2016/C 305/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fruit of the Loom, Inc. (Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Takko Holding GmbH (Telgte, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2015 (case R 1641/2014-2) relating to revocation proceedings between Takko Holding and Fruit of the Loom

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 May 2015 (Case R 1641/2014-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 May 2015 (Case R 1641/2014-2);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those of Fruit of the Loom, Inc. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those of Fruit of the Loom, Inc.

---

(1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.

1

---
July 26, 1957

A. R. D. 80.

#### *Dominick Butti*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. A. R. D. 73. Motion by appellee.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2016-C1Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C1

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of March 1, 2016 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)           A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Factory Workers' Earnings in Selected Manufacturing Industries, June 1959

              																	Schaffer, Herbert. 						*Factory Workers' Earnings in Selected Manufacturing Industries, June 1959 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1275*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										May 1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4551,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER