alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-102089, 333-102091, 333-64193, 333-90361, and 333-140108 on Form S-8, No. 333-109116 and 333-140175 on Form S-3 and No. 333-90597 on Form S-4 of our reports dated June 23, 2008, relating to theconsolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of School Specialty, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, (which report on the consolidatedfinancial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule expresses an unqualified opinion and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R),*Share-Based Payment* on April 30, 2006 and the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*on April 29, 2007), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of School Specialty, Inc. for the year ended April 26, 2008. 

/s/ DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 

June 23, 2008
No. 53272.

#### Hochschild Kohn & Company *v.*United States,

protest 53257-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on entry 3574. The protest was sustained to this extent.
**U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REM**  **EDIAL ACTION**  **DELETION DOCKET FOR**  **TORCH LAKE SITE**  **OPERABLE UNIT 1: MASON SANDS OPERABLE UNIT 3: MICHIGAN SMELTER AND ISLE ROYALE** 

**HOUGHTON COUNTY, MICHIGAN JU** **LY 26**  **, 2012**  **NO. DATE**  **AUTHOR RECIPIENT**  **TITLE/ DESCRIPTION**  **PAGES** 1 1990

- 2008 U.S. EPA Public Administrative Record 29 Index (Originals and Updates 1

- 9 for the Torch Lake Site **(DOCUMENTS CONTAINED ON THE INDEX**  **ARE INCORPORATED BY REF**   ** ER** **ENCE INTO THE DELETION DOCKET)**  2 07/25/12 Wyant, D., Karl, R., Letter re: State of 1 MDEQ U.S. EPA Michigan Concurrence with the Proposed Deletion of Torch Lake Superfund Site Operable Unit 1 (Mason Sands) and Operable Unit 3 (Michigan Smelter and Isle Royale)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27175-27176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of 
the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be

[[Page 27176]]

conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 5, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227, or 
206-220-6096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee of the 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, June 5, 2007 from 9 a.m. 
Pacific Time to 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time via a telephone conference 
call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, 
please call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Dave Coffman, 
TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or you can 
contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. Due to limited conference 
lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone 
conference call meeting must be made with Dave Coffman. Mr. Coffman can 
be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: May 6, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-9165 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Fisher Scientific Co. *v.*United States

No. 6483.

Entry No. 24.

Invoice dated Manchester, England, June 1945.

Certified June 1945.

Entered at Pittsburgh, Pa., July 13, 1945.

(Decided November 1, 1946)

*Jerome G. Clifford*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 235]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 2443]]

Public Law 115-235
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title 23, United States Code, to extend the deadline for 
    promulgation of regulations under the tribal transportation self-
       governance program. <<NOTE: Aug. 14, 2018 -  [H.R. 6414]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PROMULGATION OF REGULATIONS 
                              UNDER TRIBAL TRANSPORTATION SELF-
                              GOVERNANCE PROGRAM.

    Section 207(n)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``21 months'' and 
        inserting ``42 months''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C) by striking ``30 months'' and 
        inserting ``48 months''.

    Approved August 14, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6414:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            July 25, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 49461.

#### Protest 894927-G of Swift & Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and cited authorities, 2)4 percent allowance was made by the court for Holland Edam and Gouda cheese. Abstracts 42146 and 42309 followed. An allowance was also made for the weight of the paper or foil, or both, in which B brand Roquefort cheese was wrapped, following Abstracts 36724 and 38185.
Before the Second Division,

January 21, 1941

No. 45241.

#### Protest 902665-G/86929 of Carson, Pirie, Scott & Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the record presented the protest was overruled.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

DESMOND ABERNATHY, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 

BOARD OF REVIEW, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 130 EM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
(Reap. Dec. 9808)

#### The American International Products Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 28620.

(Decided October 10, 1950)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*George Godhram, Doul),*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Bao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise the subject of the above entitled appeal to reappraisement is properly dutiable on the basis of American Selling Price as defined in Section 402(g) Tariff Act of 1980 as amended and that the said American Selling Price was as follows for the export periods indicated.

> ITEM PERIOD PRICE

> Pas Sodium- 1959 $1.75 per lb. less 1% net packed

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

*509On the agreed facts, I fmd American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (now 402(e)), to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value was, for the year 1959, $1.75 per pound, less 1 per centum, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Reap. Dec. 9040.

#### *Elliot Import Corp. v. United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiff.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1553 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1553

To amend the Public Health Service Act to facilitate emergency medical 
services personnel training and certification curriculums for military 
                               veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2011

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Enzi) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to facilitate emergency medical 
services personnel training and certification curriculums for military 
                               veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans to Paramedics Transition 
Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PERSONNEL TRAINING FOR 
              VETERANS.

    Section 330J(c)(8) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254c-15(c)(8)) is amended by inserting before the period the following: 
``, including, as provided by the Secretary, may use funds to provide 
to military veterans required coursework and training that take into 
account, and are not duplicative of, previous medical coursework and 
training received when such veterans were active members of the Armed 
Forces, to enable such veterans to satisfy emergency medical services 
personnel certification requirements, as determined by the appropriate 
State regulatory entity''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1371 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1371

 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
  to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2011

  Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Whitehouse) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
  to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rhode Island Fishermen's Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The findings are as follows:
            (1) Rhode Island fishermen participate in fisheries managed 
        by the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC) and the 
        Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC).
            (2) Rhode Island currently has voting membership on the 
        NEFMC under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
        Management Act but does not have voting membership on the 
        MAFMC.
            (3) Rhode Island lands more MAFMC-managed stocks than any 
        other MAFMC member except the State of New Jersey.
            (4) A higher percentage of Rhode Island's commercial 
        landings (by weight or value) traditionally have come from 
        species that are managed by the MAFMC as compared to species 
        managed by NEFMC.
            (5) MAFMC has found that Rhode Island's circumstance 
        parallels that of Florida and North Carolina, which each have 
        voting membership on two different fishery management councils.

SEC. 3. ADDITION OF RHODE ISLAND TO THE MID-ATLANTIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT 
              COUNCIL.

    Section 302(a)(1)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1852(a)(1)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``Rhode Island,'' after ``States of'';
            (2) by inserting ``Rhode Island,'' after ``except North 
        Carolina,'';
            (3) by striking ``21'' and inserting ``23''; and
            (4) by striking ``13'' and inserting ``14''.
                                 <all>
```
Case Wo. 8,095.

#### LARRABEE et al. v. The PIEDMONT.

[Betts, Scr. Bk. 596.]

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

1859.

Collision — Identity—Damages.

[1. The identity of the vessel colliding with li-bellant’s vessel at anchor is sufficiently established by the testimony of the master of the vessel libelled that he passed the place in question at about the time of the collision, and came in collision with an unknown vessel.]

[2. The recovery of damages may include further repairs, where the first repairs were found insufficient after a voyage.]

[3. Damages may be given at the rate of the market value, though the vessel was under charter at the time of the collision.]

[Appeal from the district court of the United States for the Southern, district of New York.]

This was an action brought by [Stephen Larrabee and others], the owners of the brig Philip Larrabee, to recover for a collision between the vessels in night of September, 1855, while the brig was at anchor off Holmes’ Hole. The only question as to the collision was whether it was the Piedmont which ran into the brig. The master of the Piedmont was called as a witness, and testified that the steamer passed Holmes’ Hole about the time of the collision, and did come in collision with a vessel which he did not know. The court below gave a decree for the libellants. On the reference which was had to ascertain the damages, it appeared that after the collision the brig went into Edgarton, and was repaired, and then went to Boston, where it was found that the repairs were insufficient, and further repairs were there put on. The respondents claimed that the libellants could only recover for the first repairs, but the commissioner reported for the amount of the repairs at Boston, The respondents also claimed that, as the brig was under charter at the time of the collision, the rate of demurrage for the detention while being repaired was to be decided by that charter, and not by market value, and that, if proof of market value were to be given, it must be made to appear that there was a market for such vessels at the time and place, of which no evidence was given. The commissioner, however, gave damages at the rate of market value. A decree was thereupon rendered for the libellant for $4,-452 59, from which the respondents appealed to this court

Mr. Hawkins, for libellants.

Beebe, Dean & Donohue, for appellants.

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

I have looked into this case, and am satisfied the injury to the brig was committed by the Piedmont. The identity is the only question raised on the merits. The amount of damages seems to have been carefully considered, and is, I think, sustained by the proof. Decree affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN E. HOFFMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 33 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 9th day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
No. 45228.

#### Protest 990358-G of Saji Trading Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

It was stipulated that the articles in question consist of antimony ware and antimony figures chiefly used in the kitchen or household or on the table for utilitarian purposes. On the authority of Abstracts 42780 and 43050 the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
APPROVED
                                      by the Annual General Shareholders Meeting
                                             of OJSC Rostelecom on June 15, 2003
                                               Minutes No. 1 dated June 20, 2003


                                    /s/
                                    Chairman of the General Shareholders Meeting





                                   Amendments
                               to the Regulations
                   on the Management Board of OJSC Rostelecom
                             (restated version No.1)
               approved by the Annual General Shareholders Meeting
     of OJSC Rostelecom on June 1, 2002 (Minutes No. 1, dated June 10, 2002)





1. Restate Clause 7.2 as follows:  "The Board of Directors shall, on a quarterly
basis, consider the determination of the aggregate amount of remuneration of the
Management Board of the Company,  which may not exceed 0.2% of the Company's net
profit as  specified  in the  accounts  for the  quarter for which the amount of
remuneration is determined."

2. Restate Clause 7.3 as follows:

"The amount of monetary  remuneration  of each  member of the  Management  Board
shall be  proposed by the  Chairman of the  Management  Board  depending  on the
volume  and  intensity  of the work  performed  by a  particular  member  of the
Management Board.

A decision on the amount of monetary  remuneration of a member of the Management
Board shall be made at a meeting of the Management Board by a simple majority of
votes of the members of the Management Board participating in such meeting.  The
member of the Management Board on the amount of whose  remuneration the decision
is made shall not participate in the vote."
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Victor S. Elgohary, Representatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant 

Lakes on Eldridge North Community Association, Inc. V. Lakes on 

Eldridge North Community Association, Inc.; RealManage, LLC; 

Darla Kitchen; Don Byrnes; Michael Ecklund; Laura Vasallo Lee; 

John Kane; Julie Ann Bennett; Rick Hawthorne; Cara Davis; Christi 

Keller; Jim Flanary; Jill Richardson

Appellate case number: 01-14-00216-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-17221

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: 2/1/16

Party filing motion: Appellants

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is DENIED GRANTED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack 

 Acting Individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Date: August 16, 2016
# C_2017402EN.01002201.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 October 2017 — Cofra v EUIPO — Armand Thiery (1841)

(Case T-233/15) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark 1841 - Earlier national word mark AD-1841-TY - Relative ground for refusal - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Taking into account of additional evidence - Articles 57(2) and 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 64(2) and 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Rule 40(6) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430) - Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2017/C 402/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cofra Holding AG (Zug, Switzerland) (represented by M. Aznar Alonso, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by M. Capostagno and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Armand Thiery SAS (Levallois-Perret, France) (represented by A. Grolée, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2015 (Case R 805/2014-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Armand Thiery and Cofra Holding.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cofra Holding AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred, in connection with the present proceedings, by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Armand Thiery SAS. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cofra Holding AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred, in connection with the present proceedings, by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Armand Thiery SAS.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 29.6.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


             Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     I, John W. Peters, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of
Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
     September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



Date:   October 28, 2003
                                          /s/ John W. Peters
                                        ____________________________________
                                        John W. Peters
                                        Principal Executive and
                                        Financial Officer
May 27, 1944

No. 49448.

Suit 4437.

#### Sucrest *Corp.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 728 affirmed. C. A. D. 275.
-83 -82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

▲ ★

▲ ▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.03 N 77.49 W Meters AGL