alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.26
  
    nd
    
    
    a medical, dental, vision, life and disability plan
    
    a 401(k) retirement plan, with company matching contributions
    
    10 paid holidays and 15 days of paid time off
    
    Options to purchase 25,000 shares of company common stock. Such shares shall be
Incentive Stock Options (ISOs), which vest 25% annually over four years in four equal
installments. The strike price shall be the closing price of BSQUARE stock on your first
day of employment. Stock options shall expire after 10 years.
    
    Because we anticipate that you will be a heavy wireless user in the course of conducting
BSQUARE business, you will be given use of a company mobile phone, and will be placed on
the company wireless plan.




---



##### 



not
      Sincerely,
    
    
    
    
    
    Accepted By:/s/ Brian T. Crowley
    
    9/26/07
    
    
    
    /s/ Rajesh Khera
    
    9/27/07Brian Crowley
    
    Date
    
    
    
    Rajesh Khera
    
    DateChief Executive Officer
BSQUARE Corporation




---



##### 



ATTACHMENT A
Bonus Agreement



 Exhibit 10.41 
 DENNIS MCKENNA BONUS AGREEMENT 
  

	1.	EBITDAR Based Bonus. 

 (a) In the event Silicon
Graphics, Inc. (the “Company) has combined Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, Amortization and Restructuring Costs (“EBITDAR”), for the first and second quarters of the Company’s Fiscal Year 2007 that meet or
exceed the corporate plan, then the Company shall pay Dennis McKenna (“McKenna”) a bonus in the amount of $250,000.00, which shall be payable to McKenna by the earlier of 30 days after the determination of such EBITDAR by the
Company’s certified public accountants and March 15, 2007. 
 (b) For purposes of this Agreement, EBITDAR is defined as
operating income plus (a) without duplication and to the extent deducted in determining net income, the sum of (i) depreciation and amortization expense for the period, (ii) restructuring expenses and bankruptcy expenses in the
period, (iii) stock option and restricted stock expense in the period, minus (b) without duplication and to the extent included in net income, any extraordinary non-cash gains (or plus losses) included in net income for the period, minus
(c) without duplication and to the extent deducted in determining net income, any extraordinary non-cash gains (or plus losses) realized in connection with any asset sale, plus or minus (d) any pro-forma adjustments required to exclude the
effect of SOP 97-2 and fresh start accounting. 
  

	2.	Revenue Based Bonus 

 (a) In the event that the
Company’s combined Revenue for the first and second quarters of the Company’s Fiscal Year 2007 meets or exceeds $265.4 Million then the Company shall pay McKenna a bonus in the amount of $250,000.00. If the Company’s combined
Revenue is below $265.4 Million, but above $250.0 Million, McKenna shall receive a portion of the bonus based on the following formula: 
 Bonus = $250,000
(0.5 + (combined Revenue - $250,000,000)) 
                                        
                             30,800,000 
 If the Company’s combined Revenue is below $250 Million, McKenna shall not be entitled to the bonus set forth in this paragraph 2(a). If McKenna is entitled to a bonus under this paragraph 2(a), it shall be
payable to McKenna by the earlier of 30 days after the determination of Revenue by the Company’s certified public accountants and March 15, 2007 
 (b) For purposes of this Agreement, “Revenue” is defined as the revenue reported by SGI under SEC and GAAP regulations, taking into account pro-forma calculations excluding 97-2 and fresh start
accounting. 
  

	3.	Tax Treatment 

 Any payment to which McKenna becomes
entitled under this Agreement shall be subject to the Company’s collection of all applicable, federal, state and local income and employment withholding taxes, and McKenna shall only receive the amount of such payment remaining after such
withholding taxes have been collected.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, I, Kevin M. Goodwin, Chief Executive Officer of SonoSite, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of SonoSite, Inc.



/s/    KEVIN M. GOODWINKevin M. Goodwin President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


March 10, 2009
Case: 2:12-cv-00731-JLG-EPD Doc #: 40 Filed: 08/27/13 Page: 1 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

Case: 2:12-cv-00731-JLG-EPD Doc #: 40 Filed: 08/27/13 Page: 2 of 2  PAGEID #: <pageID>

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-05-08T10:19:33-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of The McClatchy
Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary B. Pruitt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: March 1, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    GARY B. PRUITT                
|                     |  |  |  | Gary B. PruittChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TS06-11-001]


Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc.; Notice of Filing

May 7, 2007.
    Take notice that on November 20, 2006, Wabash Valley Power 
Association, Inc. filed a response to the Commission's letter Order 
issued October 19, 2006, explaining that it does not have access to 
transmission, customer or market information covered by section 358, 18 
CFR 358, of the Commission's regulations.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#377172657478595b5e595264424747584543775152455419505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="367073647579585a5f585365434646594442765053445518515940">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 15, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9190 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 96-5596.

#### Styles *v.*VanZandt, Superintendent, Washington Correctional Facility, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE 

I, Allen D. Goodman, a Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) theQuarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in suchQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. 

Date:July 20, 2011 

By: /s/ Allen D. Goodman

Allen D. Goodman 

Managing Member (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. 

General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Aug. 13, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11842 ProFly Drones DJI Phantom 3

This is a request for an amendment to Ex emption No. 11842 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015– 1148, granted to ProFly Drones. This amendmen t will provide for the addition of the DJI

Phantom 3 multirotor sUAS aircraft to the inve ntory of approved aircraft for use during VLOS operations currently covered under Exemption 11842.

These airframes are commercially available to the gene ral public, as are a ll components used to complete them. In addition, all configurations of these components follow standard, wellestablished practices. No aspect of these aircraft is proprietary to ProFly Drones in design or

manufacture.

DJI Innovations Model Phantom 3 Phantom_3_4K_User_Manual_en_1.8.pdf (Uploaded to Docket)
Before the Second Division,

November 22, 1949

No. 53731.

protests 615638-G and 619551-G (New York).

#### J. Adler & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David N. Vander Ploeg, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of School Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 25, 2009 (the Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of School Specialty, Inc.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 24, 2009



/s/    David N. Vander PloegDavid N. Vander PloegExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Annual report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A
for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Han Yongbin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: | August 22, 2006
|----- | ---------------



By:

/s/ Han YongbinHan YongbinChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          33,252
<SECURITIES>                                    19,758
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (96)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,206
<PP&E>                                           6,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,935)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,882
<BONDS>                                            135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,726
<SALES>                                         10,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,256
<CGS>                                            6,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,612)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,612)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.08)


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

EPA’s Planned Proposed Rulemaking to Address the Pr ocess for Tribes to Obtain
Treatment in a Similar Manner as States for the Cle an Water Act Impaired Water Listing and Total Maximum Daily Load Program – Meeting with Members of the Western
Governors’ Association Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:15 – 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time Meeting Summary

EPA Moderators: Mark Rupp, EPA Office of Congressio nal and Intergovernmental Relations Ellen Gilinsky, Senior Policy Advisor, EPA Office of Water Ken Kopocis, Deputy Assistant Administrator fo r Water EPA Presenter: Sarah Furtak, EPA Office of Wetla nds, Oceans and Watersheds Participants: Senior officials from the sta tes of Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Wyoming

Staff representatives from the Western Governo rs’ Association and the
Western States Water Council

The planned proposed rulemaking to address the proc ess for tribes to obtain treatment in a similar manner as states for the Clean Water Act (C WA) Impaired Water Listing and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program was one of two to pics on the agenda. A planned proposed rulemaking fact sheet (May 2015) of the sa me name was provided to invitees in advance of the meeting and is available in docket E PA-HQ-OW-2014-0622.

Ellen Gilinsky gave welcoming remarks. Sarah Furtak gave a brief overview of EPA’s planned proposed rulemaking to address the process for trib es to obtain treatment in a similar manner as states for the CWA Section 303(d) Impaired Water Li sting and TMDL Program.

Ken Kopocis then invited questions and comments fro m the participants. He responded to these
issues consistent with the fact sheet identified ab ove. The following is a list of questions and
issues raised:

• One participant said that EPA should formally consu lt with the state and a tribe before the tribe applies for TAS.

• One participant asked for more details on how EPA c onsulted and coordinated with tribes as compared to states in developing the plan ned proposal.

• One participant asked if tribe can get treatment in a similar manner as a state without water quality standards.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-68710), on Form S-4 (No. 333-90597) and on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-64193 and 333-90361) of School Specialty, Inc. of our report dated
June 9, 2000, except as to Note 3, which is as of April 29, 2001 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
July 19, 2002
No. 54935.

#### Marianao Sugar Trading Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 158874-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers, the court was *334unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector,, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
#### GENUTH et al. v. NATIONAL BISCUIT CO.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Sept. 16, 1948.

Herman E. Cooper, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, of New York City, for defendant.

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Whether the defendant’s motion be treated as one under Rule 12(b) and 12(h) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. — to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter — or as one for summary judgment under Rule 56 (see, Rule 12(c) as amended), it is clear that it now appears that the court is without jurisdiction by reason of Section 2(d) of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 252(d). The answers to the defendant’s interrogatories and the affidavits leave no doubt that the activities1 for which compensation is sought under the Fair Labor Standards Act were not compensable “by either an express provision of a written or non written contract” or “a custom or practice.” The affidavits submitted by plaintiffs and defendant leave not the slightest doubt with respect to this matter. Clearly there was a custom and practice for the employees to change clothes at the commencement and the conclusion of their work. There was neither custom nor practice to compensate for such activity. It is the latter which the statute makes decisive.

*214The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit having found the Portal-to-Portal Act constitutionally valid, there is no longer any issue which n'eed delay the dismissal of the complaint. Battaglia v. General Motors Corporation, 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 254; Darr v. Mutual Life Insurance Co., 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 262.

Plaintiffs have made a cross motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint to cover the period of employment subsequent to February 26, 1947, when the original complaint was filed. Insofar as the supplemental complaint is addressed to the period subsequent to the effective date of the Portal-to-Portal Act, I see no reason why the plaintiffs should not be allowed to file. The statutory standard for compensable activities engaged in after the effective date of the Act is different from that applicable to activities prior thereto; and the motion papers have not established that the claim for compensation for such later activities is beyond the court’s jurisdiction. Considering especially that when the principal complaint in this action was filed the Portal-to-Portal Act had not yet been .enacted, I see no reason why the plaintiffs should not be allowed to file the supplemental complaint despite the fact that the principal complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint, as limited by this opinion, is granted. The defendant’s motion is granted and the original complaint is dismissed.

1

 Walking to and fro from building entrance to locker of dressing room; changing to and from special clothing from street clothing at beginning and end of shift and washing; walking to and fro from locker or dressing room to time clock; time clock punching; walking to and fro from work place to time dock.
99-0623 (La. 4/23/99)

#### ANNE LIND & ASSOCIATES v. ORLEANS PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL.

No. 99-C-0623.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Anne Lind & Associates;— Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiora-ri and/or Review; Parish of Orleans Civil District Court Div. “A” Number 94-9176; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 98CA-0848

Denied.

KIMBALL, J. not on panel.