alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             (A separate certification is required for each officer)

I, Thomas Clyne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of BNP U.S. Funding L.L.C.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within these entities, particularly
during the period in which the report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based upon such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2005

                                     /s/ Thomas Clyne
                                     -----------------------
                                     Title: Chief Financial Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.1   WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada.


|                       |                                                                                            
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2010 | /s/ Donald R. Mayer
Donald R. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
#### FARMINGTON NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF FARMINGTON, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

No. 74294.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Oct. 6, 1998.

Carl D. Kinsky, Ste. Genevieve, for plaintiff-appellant.

Reeves & Goff, P.C., William G. Reeves, Farmington, for respondent Matthews.

Colson, Wanger, Ray & Mackay, Thomas L. Ray, Gary W. Wagner, Farmington, for City of Farmington.

Before HOFF, P. J. and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Farmington Neighborhood Preservation Association (Association), a Missouri nonprofit corporation, appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing its declaratory judgment petition for lack of standing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Bonus Agreement



 Exhibit 10.42 
 DENNIS MCKENNA BONUS AGREEMENT 
 1. Third Quarter Revenue Bonus. If the Company’s Revenue
for the third quarter of fiscal year 2007 (“Q3”) equals or exceeds $139,000,000, McKenna will be entitled to receive a bonus of $125,000. If the Company’s Revenue for Q3 is less than $139,000,000 and more than $128,000,000 McKenna
will receive a bonus calculated in accordance with the following formula: 
 Revenue Bonus =
        $ 125,000 X (.5 + (Q3 Revenue Amount – 128,000,000)) 
                                        
                                        
             22,000,000 
 If Revenue for Q3 is less than $128,000,000, McKenna will receive
no Q3 Revenue bonus. “Revenue” is defined as the revenue reported by the Company under SEC and GAAP regulations, taking into account pro-forma calculations excluding SOP 97-2 and fresh start accounting. 
 This bonus shall be based on the Company’s actual financial performance for Q3 and, if payable, shall be paid on thirty (30) calendar days after the
determination of Revenue by the Company’s certified public accountants. 
 2. Third Quarter EBITDAR Bonus. If the Company’s EBITDAR for Q3
equals or exceeds $2,500,000, McKenna will receive a bonus of $125,000. If the Company’s EBITDAR for Q3 is less than $2,500,000 and more than $0, McKenna will receive a bonus calculated in accordance with the following formula: 
 EBITDAR Bonus =         $125,000 X (Q3 EBITDAR Amount) 
                                        
                                 2,500,000 
 If the Company’s Q3 EBITDAR is less than $0, McKenna will not receive any Q3 EBITDAR bonus. “EBITDAR” is defined as operating income plus
(a) without duplication and to the extent deducted in determining net income, the sum of (i) depreciation and amortization expense for the period, (ii) restructuring expenses and bankruptcy expenses in the period, (iii) stock
option and restricted stock expense in the period, minus (b) without duplication and to the extent included in net income, any extraordinary non-cash gains (or plus losses) included in net income for the period, minus (c) without
duplication and to the extent deducted in determining net income, any extraordinary non-cash gains (or plus losses) realized in connection with any asset sale, plus or minus (d) any pro-forma adjustments required to exclude the effect of SOP
97-2 and fresh start accounting. 
 The Q3 EBITDAR bonus shall be based on the Company’s actual financial performance for Q3 and, if payable, shall be
paid thirty (30) calendar days after the determination of EBITDAR by the Company’s certified public accountants.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Medical Solutions Management Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Brian Lesperance, President and Treasurer (principal executive officer
and principal accounting and finance officer)of the Company certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Brian Lesperance                                                     
|                        |  |  |  | Brian Lesperance                                                         
|                        |  |  |  | President and Treasurer                                                  
|                        |  |  |  | (principal executive officer and principalaccounting and finance officer)
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

99–011 2011

112th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 112–48 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 3101A(a)(1)(A) 

OF TITLE 31, UNITED STATES CODE 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A MESSAGE CERTIFYING THAT THE DEBT SUBJECT TO LIMIT IS 

WITHIN $100,000,000,000 OF THE LIMIT IN 31 U.S.C. 3101(b) AND 

THAT FURTHER BORROWING IS REQUIRED TO MEET EXISTING 

COMMITMENTS 

AUGUST 5, 2011.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed 


tjames on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

tjames on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

Pursuant to section 3101A(a)(1)(A) of title 31, United States 

Code, I hereby certify that the debt subject to limit is within 

$100,000,000,000 of the limit in 31 U.S.C. 3101(b) and that further 

borrowing is required to meet existing commitments. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, August 2, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with REPORTS
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v EDWARD WARD, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

19 USCMA 573, 42 CMR 175

*574No. 23,001

July 17, 1970

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent, Captain Monte Engler,*and *Captain Norman L. Blumenfeld*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel David T. Bryant, Captain William R. Steinmetz,*and *Captain James L. Rider*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The issue in this case concerns the propriety of the military judge’s examination of the sentence portion of the accused’s pretrial agreement with the convening authority. We sustained the procedure in United States v Villa, 19 USCMA 564, 42 CMR 166 (1970). Accordingly, the decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Judge DARDEN concurs.

FERGUSON, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

I disagree with my brothers’ decision in this ease for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Villa, 19 USCMA 564, 42 CMR 166 (1970).
**DEPA RTMENT OF THE A**  **I R FORCE**  HEADQUARTERS AIR FOR CE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY

23 Sep 11
MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC

- 10
FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3O 6500 South MacArthur Blvd (AJW31AF) Oklahoma City , OK 73169
SUBJECT: Renewal of Exemption 7960 (Docket No. FAA

- 2001

- 10191)
1. Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Exemption 7960 was granted to the United States Air Force on 24 Jan 2003 (renewed as 7960 C on 2 2 Jan 200 9 ) and exempts certain activities of the USAF from the provisions of 14 CFR §91.209 (a) (1) and (b). The requirement for the Air Force, and other military

service’s aircraft participating in approved joint or combined air operations, to conduct night vision device (NVD) training with lights out in Military Operating Areas (MOA) continues. W e request a 3

- ye ar extension to this exemption IAW 14 CFR Part 11.

2. The Air Force respectfully requests additional MOA’s be added to the list of approved areas. The list of MOAs to be covered under this exemption is maintained as Attachment 1 to th is letter. Changes to this list from the previous list include a few additions of new or re

- designated MOAs.

3. T he Air Force will continue to abide by all the terms and conditions of Exemption 7960, as amended. These include, but are not limited to: i ssuing a NOTAM at least 48 hours before the lights out operations are to begin; providing annual informational briefings to local flying organizations and other civilian users within 100 nautical miles of the MOA airspace; developing a letter of agreement with the servicing air traffic control facility ; and continuous radar monitoring by

military personnel to detect all nonparticipating aircraft. As lights out NVD operations have been conducted safely by these units since this exemption was granted in 2003
, the Air Force Flight Standards Agency , on behalf of the Department of the Air Force, requests yo ur consideration in granting this request.

3. Imay be contacted at (405) 739

- 9783, e

- mail: hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil . Thank you in advance for your consideration and assistance.

WI LLIAM D. HART , Lt Col, USAF Chief, Flight Directives Division**ATTACHMENT 1** 2011 MOA L ist for FAA Exemption 7960 * = new or change for 2011
MOA (All subdivisions unless otherwise noted. e.g. Eagle Hi & Lo , 1 & 2, etc. )

Adirondack Galena Pickett Airburst Gamecock Pike Avon G andy Pine Hill Bagdad G ladden Pinon Canyon Basinger Goose Powder River Beaver Hart Red Hills Birch Hay s Reserve Bison H ill Top Reveille Bronco Ho g (Hi N&S, L o N&S) Rose Hill Brownwood Howard Saddle Brush Creek Ja c kal Salem Buckeye J arbidge Sells Buffalo Juniper Sevier Bulldog Kingsville Sey mour Johnson Camden Ridge Lake Andes Smokey Carthage Lake Placid Snoopy Cato La Veta (Low) Steelhead Cheyenne Lindbergh Stony Condor Lowville Susitna Cranberry Lucin Taiban Cry pt Delta* Marian Moody Talon Tiger Desert M orenci Tombstone DeSoto Mt. Dora Truman Devils Lake Dolphin * Naknek Oly mpic Tupper Turtle Duke O’Neill T welve Mile Eielson Outlaw Volk Eureka Owy hee Warrior Falls Palatka Yankee Farmville Paradise Yukon Fox Pecos
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of O2Diesel Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report),
I, Alan Rae, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David Koontz, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: August 13, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ Alan Rae
    
    By:
    
    /s/ David KoontzName: Alan Rae
    
    
    
    Name: David KoontzTitle: Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Title: Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    
    
    (Principal Executive Officer)
 This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to O2Diesel Corporation and will be retained by O2Diesel Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
02/07/201 1 15:5 G FA X 202493514 2 FA A ^'^' ^ * QM S 21001/00 2 

### :>PARTMENTO F •/N3P0RWI0 N UNITE D STATE S D*:PARTM£^ T OJ - TRANSFOR I ATIO N : , CPFRAT'ON S OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C , '- j FE B - 1 P U

: 0 5 I N THIi IVTATTE

RO F AMERICAN EAGL

E AIRLINES , INC , FA A DOCKET NO . CP09SWOOO( i FA A Cas e No . 2008SW21028 8 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) Judt; c Richai'dC . Goodwi n 

# iECEiVE D JA N 

### 2 5 201 1 

## -^??4RIN G DOCKE T

WITHDRAWA L O FNOTIC E O FAPPEA L Comcs j no w th e Admini.strator , throug h hi s Regiona l Counsel , an dwithdraw s ih c Notic e o f Appea l file dDecembe r

23 , 2010 , in ih c abov e numbere dan dentitle dmatter , pursuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R . {?l3.233(d)(2 ) o f th e Rule s o f

Practic e Fo

r FAA Civi l Penalty Actions . DAVID L . DONNCI. L Actin g Regiona

l Counse l Southwes t Region By : RenalV! . Price , Senio r Attorne y Safet y Enforcemen

t Branc h Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n For t Worth , T X 76193-0007 (817 ) 222-506 8 FA

X (817 ) 222-5945/ 6 e-mail : rena.m.phce@faa.go v Dated : Januar

y 19,201 102/07/201 1 15:5 G FA X 202483514 2 FA A. nu ^

——^'^' ^ * DM S @)002/00 2

CERTrFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t I hav e thi. s date place di n tli e Unite dState s mail , Certilic d Retur n Receip t Requested , acopy o f

the Withdrawa

l o f Notic e o f Appea l addresse dt o ihe IbUowing : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Wilbur Wright Building , St

o 2W100 0 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , $.W . Washington , DC 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docket

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Franci s C . Ilcil , Ksq . Legal Dcparlmen

L American Eagle , LK . P.O . Bo x 61961 6 TV1D567 5 DF W Airport , T X 75261-961 6 

# U Sylvi aTwa , ParaLcga

l Technicia

n Fcdeixl^Aviatio n Administratio n Dated : 

### / - /^ . 

### 2^/ /
Weston Solutions, Inc. 2705 Bee Cave Road, Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78746

512-651-7100 • Fax 512-651-7101

24 April 2014

Mr. Wren Stenger

Director Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202

RE: Response to 27 March 2014 Letter Requesting Permit Authority Selection Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit Natgasoline LLC Natural Gas to Gasoline Project, Beaumont, Texas

Dear Mr. Stenger:

Natgasoline LLC (Natgasoline) requests that the EPA proceed with the GHG PSD permitting process for the above-referenced project to be constructed in Beaumont, Texas. This request is provided in response to your 27 March 2014 letter to Mr. Kevin Struve of Natgasoline wherein you requested the company’s preference to c ontinue the GHG PSD permit processing under the authority of the EPA or the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Natgasoline authorized Weston Solutions, Inc. to submit this response to your attention.

Natgasoline kindly requests that EPA continue processing the GHG PSD permit application as quickly as possible. The TCEQ’s final PSD permit for this project is estimated to be issued in May 2014. Natgasoline appreciates the atte ntion of EPA’s GHG permit team; however, construction delays associated with the air quality permitting schedule are already causing escalating project costs and other economic impacts for the company.

If you have any questions regarding this subm ittal, please contact me at (512) 651-7148 or via email at Blake.Soyars@westonsolutions.com.

Very truly yours, WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.

Blake Soyars, P.E. Client Service Manager

cc Ms. Bonnie Braganza – EPA Region 6 Mr. Kevin Struve – Natgasoline LLC, Beaumont, TX
No. 50731.

#### Protests 396-K, etc., of Abraham & Straus, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 228**  **8**

ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

VIRGINIA IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:12

- cv
- 0052 2

- AWA

- TEM )

Submitted : December 13 , 2012 Decided: December 18, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Eric Emanuel Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Emanuel Taylor appeal s the district court’s order
dismissing witho ut prejudice for failure to state a claim his
civil complaint against the Commonwealth of Virginia. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Taylor does not challenge in his informal brief the basis for the district
court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately pres ented in th e materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED