alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016454EN.01002301.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2016 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-141/15) (1)

((EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Protection of vineyards - Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations))

(2016/C 454/42)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Očková, J. Vláčil and L. Březinová, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/103 of 16 January 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2015, L 16, p. 33), in so far as it excludes the expenditure envisaged by the Czech Republic under EAGF for a degree of protection of vineyards for the years 2010 to 2012, coming to a total of EUR 2 123 199,04.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 29.6.2015.

---
Setup

PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING HERE

User Choices

FPindex 2 AEO 2000 - Reference Case

StartYear 2006 Projection TrendBaseOpt 1 Baseline (SEER=10) Elec Elec Elec

StdOpt 4 30% Impr. (SEER=13) cent/kWh cent/kWh cent/kWh

PriceOpt 1 1998 8.05 1.00 1998 8.05

System Opt 1 1999 7.92 0.98 2000 7.86CB 0 2000 7.86 0.98 2010 7.39

2001 7.74 0.96 2020 7.28

Multi-Run Options: 2002 7.63 0.95 2030 7.28

StdOptBegin 2 2003 7.59 0.94 2000-2030

StdOptEnd 7 2004 7.56 0.94 Growth -0.3%

2005 7.47 0.93

Comm./Resid. Choice 2 <-This cell is dynamically defined when 2006 7.48 0.93

user updates the % comm. and % resid. 2007 7.48 0.93

% Shipment Breakdown (Don’t change assumptions here) 2008 7.46 0.93

 Commercial 1 10.0% 2009 7.37 0.92 Residential 2 90.0% 2010 7.39 0.92Base Manuf. Cost $511 2011 7.33 0.91Base Equipment Price $1,240 2012 7.30 0.91Base Opt Manuf. Cost $511 2013 7.29 0.91Base Opt Equipment Price $1,240 2014 7.32 0.91Std Opt Manuf. Cost $731 2015 7.33 0.91Std Opt Equipment Price $1,665 2016 7.32 0.91System Installation Price $1,367 2017 7.32 0.91

2018 7.32 0.91

value user use 2019 7.29 0.91

used value default 2020 7.28 0.90

Manufacturer Markup 123% 0% 1 2021 7.28 0.90

Distributor Markup 109% 0% 1 2022 7.28 0.90

Dealer Markup 127% 0% 1 2023 7.28 0.90

Builder Markup 109% 0% 1 2024 7.28 0.90

Sales Tax 104% 0% 1 2025 7.28 0.90

Std. Level 2026 7.28 0.90

Std Opt Price Multiplier 100% 0% 1 0 2027 7.28 0.90

109% 0% 1 1 2028 7.28 0.90116% 0% 1 2 2029 7.28 0.90143% 0% 1 3 2030 7.28 0.90174% 0% 1 4

187% 0% 1 5187% 0% 1 6

Page 1
Case No. 6,929.

#### HURST v. HURST.

[3 Dall. 512.]

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

April Term, 1799.

TRIAL — CONTINUANCE.

[The refusal of one of the parties in an action at law to file an answer to a bill seeking discovery of facts essential to the case of his opponent is a ground for the continuance of the trial.]

This cause being marked- for trial, Inger-soll moved for a continuance, on the ground, that a bill in equity had been filed by his client, the defendant, in the circuit court, for the New York district, calling for a discovery and account, in relation to the matters in controversy in the present suit; but that the plaintiff here had refused to file an answer to the bill, in consequence of which, an attachment had issued against him. After some remarks by Rawle, in opposition to the continuance,

IREDELL, Circuit Justice.

Though on general grounds, I should be very reluctant to agree to the continuance of a cause of this description, which, in a variety of shapes, has been long depending, I think the particular circumstances that have been stated, call for the interposition of the court. The disclosure of certain facts, that depend on the knowledge of the plaintiff, is deemed essential to a fair decision: if the disclosure will not injure him, he can have no reason for refusing to make it; while his refusal to answer the bill in equity filed in New York, at the same time that he presses for a trial of the *common*law suit here, raises a strong presumption against him. Under this impression therefore, the continuance is now allowed; and we shall be disposed' to hear favorably every future application to postpone a trial, until the plaintiff has filed a satisfactory answer to the' bill in. equity.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-11T20:01:59Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-11T20:02:00Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-11T20:02:00Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="11799">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-11T20:01:59Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<div class="ocr">07 - 6630

WHT UCA AY
AND Not
RE (SUED
</div>

</div>
</body></html>
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011�1003

Combined Multibeam and LIDAR Bathymetry Data from Eastern Long Island Sound and Westernmost Block Island Sound � A Regional Perspective

----

## Conversion Factors 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27590-27591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service (MMS)


Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams and Leasing 
Maps

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Availability of revised North American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27) 
Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams and Leasing Maps.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that effective with this publication, 
the following NAD 27-based Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction 
Diagrams and Leasing Maps last revised on the date indicated are 
available for information only, in the Gulf of Mexico OCS Regional 
Office, New Orleans, Louisiana. Copies are also available for download 
at http://www.mms.gov/ld/maps.htm. The Minerals Management Service in 
accordance with its authority and responsibility under Title 43, Code 
of Federal Regulations, is updating the basic record used for the 
description of mineral and oil and gas lease sales in the geographic 
areas they represent.

Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams in the Western 
and Central Gulf of Mexico Planning Areas

Description/Date

NG15-02 (Garden Banks)--February 28, 2007
NG15-05 (Keathley Canyon)--February 28, 2007

[[Page 27591]]

NG15-08 (Sigsbee Escarpment)--February 28, 2007
LA1A (West Cameron Area, West Addition)--February 28, 2007
LA1B (West Cameron Area, South Addition)--February 28, 2007
LA12 (Sabine Pass Area)--February 28, 2007

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of Official Protraction 
Diagrams (OPDs) and Leasing Maps are $2.00 each. These may be purchased 
from the Public Information Unit, Information Services Section, Gulf of 
Mexico OCS Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park 
Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394, Telephone (504)736-2519 
or (800) 200-GULF.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Official Protraction Diagrams and Leasing 
Maps may be obtained in two digital formats: gra files for use in ARC/
INFO and .pdf files for viewing and printing in Adobe Acrobat.

    Dated: April 12, 2007.
Robert P. LaBelle,
Acting Associate Director for Offshore Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. E7-9344 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
January 29, 2015 Mr. Gregg Fortunato Memphis 

### I Shelby County Health Department - Air Pollution Control 814 Jefferson Ave. Memphis, TN 38105
RE: Idling of Cargill equipment and monitoring Dear Mr. Fortunato: Perourphone conversations, on January28'h, 2015, the following emission points/groups were idled and are no longer in production. Emission Unit/Group Description 1001A EL Barqe Corn Belt Dust Collector 1003A EL Corn Rail Scale Dust Collector 1003B EL Corn Barge Scale Dust Collector 1004 EL Corn Aspiration Dust Collector 1005 EL #1 & #2 Corn Silo Vent Filter 1006 EL#3 Corn Silo Vent Filter 1007 EL

### #4Corn Silo Vent Filter 1008 EL #5 & #6 Corn Silo Vent Filter 1009 EL#7 Corn Silo Vent Filter 1010 EL #8 & #9 Corn Silo Vent Filter 1012 EL Cracked Corn Bin Dust Collector 2000 Steepinq Process, All Units 3000 Millhouse, All Units 4000 Feedhouse, All Units st Carg1ll requests thatasof February 1 ,2015, the online and manual monitoring tasksforthese emission points and groupswill no longer be required to be performed. Please contact me at (901)775-7085 ifyou haveanyquestions.



# //~~

**~.Bioui**

EHS Manager

2330 Buoy St. P.O. Box 13368 Memphis, TN 38113 901-775-5800
#### Universal Foreign Service Co., Agents for Saji Trading Co., Ltd. *v.*United States

No. 6126.

Invoices dated Yokohama, Japan, December 16, 1935, etc.

Certified December 16, 1935, etc.

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif., January 9, 1936, etc.

Entry No. 5870, etc.

*387(Decided April 10, 1945)

*Philip Stein*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliyee, Presiding Judge:

Tbe appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between'counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

> (1) That the merchandise involved in the appeals listed in the attached schedule consists of rayon articles, made of rayon which in all material respects is such or similar to the rayon in the articles the subject of decision in *United States*v. *Nippon Dry Goods Co.,*Reap. Dec. 5006, affirming Reap. Dec. 4704; and that the issue herein and conditions as to the market value are the same as the issue and conditions as to market value in the cited cases, and the record in said cases is hereby incorporated herein.

> (2) That the appraised values of the rayon articles covered by these appeals, less any additions made by the importer by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax, to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases, represent the prices at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and represent the export values of such merchandise, and that there were no higher foreign values at the time of exportation thereof.

> (3) That the appeals, herein are abandoned as to all merchandise except the rayon articles, and these cases are submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the rayon articles here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less any additions made by the importer by reason of the so-called Japanese consumption tax to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

**United States Subsidiaries:**

CardioDynamics Internation Corporation, a Delaware subsidiary 

LumenVu, Inc., a Delaware subsidiary 

Kesa Inc., a Delaware subsidiary 

**Foreign Subsidiaries:**

ABC 123 Ltd, a Hong Kong subsidiary 

Medis Medizinische Messtechnik GmbH, a German subsidiary 

SonoSite, Ltd., a UnitedKingdom subsidiary 

SonoSite France SARL, a French subsidiary 

SonoSite GmbH, a German subsidiary 

SonoSite Iberica, S.L., a Spanish subsidiary 

SonoSite Italy S.r.l, an Italiansubsidiary 

SonoSite (Asia) Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary 

SonoSite Japan KK, a Japanese subsidiary 

SonoSite Australasia Pty Limited, an Australian subsidiary 

SonoSite Canada, Inc.,a Canadian subsidiary 

SonoSite China Medical Ltd., a Hong Kong subsidiary 

SonoSite Limited, a Hong Kong subsidiary 

SonoSite Singapore Pte. Ltd., a Singapore subsidiary 

SonoSite India Pte Limited,an Indian subsidiary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001055458
<NAME> AZTEC TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-25-1998
<CASH>                                           1,976
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,626
<INVENTORY>                                      9,443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,084
<PP&E>                                           9,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,404
<BONDS>                                            309
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,116
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,445
<SALES>                                        116,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,341
<CGS>                                          100,137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,797
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,474
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
        

</TABLE>
No. 56693.

Suit 4682.

#### United States *v.*Malhame & Co. et al.

Reap. Dec. 7965 affirmed November 7, 1951. C. A. D. 472.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1497 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1497

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend for 3 years 
               reasonable cost contracts under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2011

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Bennet, and Mr. 
   Franken) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend for 3 years 
               reasonable cost contracts under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Cost Contract Extension Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF MEDICARE REASONABLE COST CONTRACTS.

    Section 1876(h)(5)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395mm(h)(5)(C)(ii)) is amended, in the matter preceding subclause (I), 
by striking ``January 1, 2013'' and inserting ``January 1, 2016''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 46983.

#### Protest 996443-G of Kreusser & Schaad (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The hats in question were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed, in view; of stipulation of counsel.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHeat recovery subsystem and overall system integration of fuel cell on-site integrated energy systemsThe best HVAC (heating, ventilating and air conditioning) subsystem to interface with the Engelhard fuel cell system for application in commercial buildings was determined. To accomplish this objective, the effects of several system and site specific parameters on the economic feasibility of fuel cell/HVAC systems were investigated. An energy flow diagram of a fuel cell/HVAC system is shown. The fuel cell system provides electricity for an electric water chiller and for domestic electric needs. Supplemental electricity is purchased from the utility if needed. An excess of electricity generated by the fuel cell system can be sold to the utility. The fuel cell system also provides thermal energy which can be used for absorption cooling, space heating and domestic hot water. Thermal storage can be incorporated into the system. Thermal energy is also provided by an auxiliary boiler if needed to supplement the fuel cell system output. Fuel cell/HVAC systems were analyzed with the TRACE computer program.Document ID19840012847Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMougin, L. J.*(Trane Co. LaCrosse, WI, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJuly 15, 1983Subject CategoryEnergy Production And ConversionReport/Patent NumberDOE/NASA/0241-12NASA-CR-168309NAS 1.26:168309Accession Number84N20915Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DEN3-241Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840012847.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Before the First Division,

June 7, 1944

No. 49469.

#### Protest 99368-K of American Import Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is the same as that the subject of Abstract 43340 this claim in the protest was sustained.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-60563 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM SAPPINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:95-CR-003

- - - - - - - - - -

October 24, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William Sappington appeals the revocation of his probation. 

Having reviewed the record and Sappington’s arguments on appeal,

we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

revoking probation. See United States v. King, 990 F.2d 190, 193 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 114 S. Ct. 223 (1993).

 AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.29
                                                                         Summary
                                                                     Translation
                                                                     -----------

Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount Guarantee signed by and between  Development
Bank and the Company dated as of August 30, 2004
>>   Contract number: Shenfa Longgang ebaozi No.20040830001.
>>   As  guarantor,   the  Company   undertakes  to  assume  joint  and  several
     responsibilities  to secure  performance of the contract for the discounted
     commercial  drafts  facilities  (principal  contract) signed by and between
     Shenzhen Tongli Precision Pressed Product Co. Ltd.("Shenzhen  Tongli") "and
     Development  Bank  which  include  the loan  principal,  interest,  penalty
     interest,  expenses for the Lender to realize its  creditor's  rights,  and
     maximum secured amount for the loan principal is RMB10 million.
>>   Guaranty period starts from the signing date of this Guaranty  Contract and
     ends in two years time from expiry of each credit  facility  used under the
     principal contract.

Terms that have been  omitted:  indebtedness  to be secured and maximum  amount;
commitment  of the  guarantor;  liability;  dispute  settlement;  miscellaneous;
effectiveness; validity; and attention.