alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vicente ZAMORA, aka Vincente Zamora, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-30058.

D.C. No. CR-03-00021-aka-RRB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Mark A. Rosenbaum, Asst. U.S. Atty., USAK—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mary Jane Haden, FPDAK—Federal Public Defender’s Office, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Vicente Zamora appeals the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 841(b)(1)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We are not persuaded, either by Zamora’s contention that the district court committed clear error in finding that Zamora failed to qualify for the safety valve reduction, or his contention that the court failed to make the necessary factual findings in *64support of its denial of the safety valve. *See United States v. Franco-Lopez,*312 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2002). In finding that Zamora failed to provide truthfully all information and evidence he had concerning the offense, the court specifically referred to Zamora’s inconsistent statements at the time of arrest and during a post-arrest interview, and it concluded that Zamora was not being forthright. *See id.; see also*U.S.S.G. § 501.2(a)(5).

Although Zamora’s sentence was imposed at a time when the Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory, the district court imposed the mandatory minimum under the statute, which was neither driven by the Guidelines nor exceeded the maximum authorized by the facts established by a plea of guilty. *See United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 756, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
# Table 3. Rock type
CITY AND BOROUGH OF WRANGELL 

INCORPORATED MAY 30,2008 

P.O. BOX 531 (907)-874-2381 

Wrangell, AK 99929 FAX (907)-874-3952, 

January 24, 2013 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington D.C. 20590 

.' .... 

RE: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova. Yakutat, Gustavas. 

Petersburg. and Wrangell Alaska Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to provide 

essential air service to our community -Wrangell, AK, and the region of Southeast Alaska. 

Alaska Airlines' current pattern of service - utilizing jet aircraft - meets crucial needs that would 

be difficult, if not impossible, to meet with any other type of service or aircraft type. Alaska 

Airlines' connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major communities of interest, 

with single phase service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan, or Seattle. From these hubs, our 

community can access the airline's extensive route system and benefit from its marketing 

relationships with other carriers. 

The 737-400 combination ("combi") passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines 

proposes to continue using on this route, provides freight, mail, and cargo capacity that a nonjet carrier simply cannot provide. Further, the 737-400 combi aircraft is equipped with Required 

Navigation performance Technology precision technology, which enables the airline to reliably 

access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in 

turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the community. In summary. Alaska's 

jet service is critical to the economic well being of not only our community, but the entire region. 

For these reasons, on behalf of the citizens and business community of Wrangell, we 

respectfully urge the Department of Transportation to select Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide essential air service to Southeast Alaska, as the airline has successfully done for well 

more than thirty years. 

Cc:c Maybr and Borough Assembly, City.and Borough .of Wrangell
No. 50727.

#### Protests 90489-K, etc., of China Dry Goods Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The testimony of plaintiff’s witness relating to the merchandise in question was held to be of little value, in view of his limited experience in handling toys. The Government examiner testified that he had returned as toys, fur dogs containing a device for producing a squeak; and those without such device, as manufactures of fur. The Government moved to dismiss the protests on the ground that plaintiff had failed to make out a *prima facie*case. The record being wholly insufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the motion to dismiss was granted.
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of COMPAÑÍA INTERNACIONAL DE TELECOMUNICACIONES S.A. (the Company) on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Juan Ignacio López Basavilbaso, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





By:   /s/    Juan Ignacio López Basavilbaso

Name: Juan Ignacio López Basavilbaso

Title: Chief Financial Officer



April 15, 2003
Before the Second Division,

January 24, 1940

No. 43097.

#### Protests 238920-G, etc., of N. J. Gorra & Bro. (Bridgeport).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Venice lace similar to that involved in *Littwitz*v. *United States*(3 Cust. Ct. 123, C. D. 217) was held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00418-CR

BILLY WAYNE BELL, JR. APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. No decision of this court having 

been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: February 23, 2012
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
American Media Incorporated
Behavioral Technology, Inc.
Decker Communications, Inc.
J. Howard & Associates, Inc.
KC Resources Creative Solutions, Inc.
Learning Systems Sciences, Inc.
MOHR Retail Learning Systems, Inc.
Novations Group, Inc.
Star Mountain, Inc.
 
     All of the named subsidiaries were organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware (except American Media Incorporated which was organized under the laws
of the State of Iowa). Aside from American Media Incorporated (which conducts
certain business under the name "Business Advantage Inc."), no named subsidiary
does business under any other name.
---

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the
Contract) Entered into by and between BAK International (Tianjin) Limited
(the Guarantor)and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen
Development Bank (the Creditor) on January 21, 2011

Main contents:

- Guaranty Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Ebaozi 20110120001-3;
- Bak International (Tianjin) Limited undertakes to assume joint and several
  liabilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the Obligor)s indebtedness
  towards Shenzhen Development Bank under the Comprehensive Credit Facility
  Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.: Shenfa Longgang Zongzi
  20110120001) from January 26, 2011 to January 18, 2012, and the maximum amount
  secured is RMB200 million.
- Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty under this Contract shall be
  guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay
  off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including
  the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in advance to its original
  expiry date due to default of the obligor or the guarantor).
- Scope of Guaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of the loan
  principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract compensation,
  damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost,
  lawyers fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is incurred
  to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of
  this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility
  Agreement and relevant agreement entered into under the Credit Facility
  Agreement.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Payment on demand
- Guarantee period
- Guarantee Responsibility
- Instances of Breach of Contract and its Liabilities
- Declaration, guaranty and undertaking of the Guarantor
- Amendment of the Contract
- Effectiveness and Disputation settlement

---
No. 54313.

#### A1-Tray Co. and Import Export Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 147850-K and 150824-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Digital economy.**
 
2000:Report | Appendices
2002:Report
2003:Report | Appendices| Appendices Tables
 
SuDoc Number:LinkC 1.96:
Item Number:0128-T (online)
CGP systemNumber:000563372
 
November 19, 2018
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 10857 and # 10858] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 1. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-1695-DR) , dated 4/27/2007. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         4/15/2007 and continuing through 4/23/2007.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         5/7/2007.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         6/26/2007.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         1/28/2008.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of New Hampshire, dated 4/27/2007 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 4/15/2007 and continuing through 4/23/2007. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E7-9189 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>certification 093001.txt
                                                           Exhibit 99.2



Insert for Below Signatures on Form 10-Q (9-30-01)


                                     CERTIFICATION



               Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, the undersigned officer
of Uptowner Inns, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended September 30, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  ___________              ____________________________
                                             Name:  /s/ Carl E. Midkiff
                                             Title:     Chief Executive Officer




                                      CERTIFICATION



               Pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, the undersigned officer
of Uptowner Inns, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended September 30, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  ___________              ____________________________
                                             Name:  /s/ David Robinson
                                             Title:     Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1485 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1485

 To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to include ultralight vehicles under 
   the definition of aircraft for purposes of the aviation smuggling 
           provisions under that Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2011

  Mr. Udall of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. Heller, Mr. Bingaman, and 
Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to include ultralight vehicles under 
   the definition of aircraft for purposes of the aviation smuggling 
           provisions under that Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may cited as the ``Ultralight Aircraft Smuggling 
Prevention Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE AVIATION SMUGGLING PROVISIONS OF THE TARIFF 
              ACT OF 1930.

    (a) In General.--Section 590 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1590) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g) Definition of Aircraft.--As used in this section, the term 
`aircraft' includes an ultralight vehicle, as defined by the 
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.''.
    (b) Criminal Penalties.--Subsection (d) of section 590 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1590(d)) is amended in the matter 
preceding paragraph (1), by inserting ``, or attempts or conspires to 
commit,'' after ``commits''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section apply with 
respect to violations of any provision of section 590 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 on or after the 30th day after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.

SEC. 3. INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION.

    The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering 
shall, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and 
Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, identify equipment 
and technology used by the Department of Defense that could also be 
used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to detect and track the 
illicit use of ultralight aircraft near the international border 
between the United States and Mexico.
                                 <all>
```
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Argan, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: June 8, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Rainer H. BosselmannRainer H. BosselmannChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer