alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6353
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PHILLIP ANTONIO OWENS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-93-50) Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 3, 2005 Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Phillip Antonio Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Phillip Antonio Owens appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Owens’ motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Owens , No. CR-93-50 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 7, 2005 & entered Feb. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and ar gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 50722.

#### Protest 116871-K of Charles A. Redden, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose anything sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Domestic operational lawhandbook ... for judge advocates.**
 
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2013 | 2015 | 2018
 
SuDoc Number:D 108.10/2-2:
Item Number:0348-C-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001081076
 
September 27, 2018
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, H. Douglas Chaffin, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ H. Douglas Chaffin
-----------------------
H. Douglas Chaffin
Chief Executive Officer
May 7, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  303,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,214)
<INVENTORY>                                    126,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               467,918
<PP&E>                                         820,459
<DEPRECIATION>                               (368,491)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,301,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          244,823
<BONDS>                                        432,069
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,764
<OTHER-SE>                                     487,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,301,822
<SALES>                                        384,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               384,915
<CGS>                                          267,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  349,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,382
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,353
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 10864 and # 10865]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts dated 5/07/2007. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         4/15/2007 through 4/19/2007. *Effective Date:*
                         5/7/2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         7/6/2007. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         2/7/2008.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Essex. *Contiguous Counties:* Massachusetts: Middlesex, Suffolk. New Hampshire: Hillsborough, Rockingham. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentHomeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.750Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.875Businesses wth Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10864 B and for economic injury is 10865 0. The Commonwealth and State which received an EIDL Declaration # are Massachusetts and New Hampshire. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: May 7, 2007. Steven C. Preston, Administrator.


[FR Doc. E7-9164 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 96-5773.

#### Veneri *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.
Inspection	Item Compliant?	(Y/N) Issue	Description	and	Required	Mainenance Completion	Date Performed	By	(Print)Performed	By	(Signature) Software/	Firmware	Update Airframe Engines Propellers Camera	Gimbal Landing	Gear Vibration	Dampening Battery	Chargability Other	(describe)

Inspector Signature:

Date 

# MONTHLY	MAINTENANCE	LOG FLIGHT	EVOLVED	|	523	W.	Main	St.	|	Hamilton,	MT	59840 701-290-0222	|	info@flight-evolved.com	|	406-360-1407	|

__________________________________________________________ UAS	Model	______________ Inspector	____________________ Date	of	Inspection	_______________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,380,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,436,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,420,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,436,864
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,958
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,212
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                143,286
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   143,286
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6984** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. VICTORIA BOATENG , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:05

- cr - 00422

- CCB

- 2; 1:09

- cv - 01858

- CCB )

Submitted : October 11 , 2012 Decided: October 15, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN , and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Victoria Boateng , Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, Assistant United States Attorney, James G. Warwick , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this c ircuit.2 PER CURIAM: Victoria Boateng seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on h er 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boateng has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                           WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT, INC.

                          UNITED STATES SUBSIDIARIES
                          --------------------------

WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT, INC.
-------------------------
owns 100% of the outstanding stock or membership interests of the following:

     DirectPro LLC, a New York limited liability company
     Freedom Graphic Services, Inc., a New Jersey corporation
     iGetSmart.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation
     Irvine Commercial Printers, Inc., a California corporation
     Premier Graphics, Inc., a South Carolina corporation
     SFI of Delaware, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
     TLB, Inc., a Virginia corporation
     United Envelope, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
     Workflow Direct, Inc., a California corporation
     Workflow Management Acquisition Corp., a New Jersey corporation
     Workflow Management Acquisition II Corp., a Delaware corporation

SFI OF DELAWARE, LLC
--------------------
owns 100% of the outstanding stock of the following:

     ALF Graphics, Inc., a New York corporation
     Office Electronics, Inc, an Illinois corporation
     SFI of Puerto Rico, Inc., a Delaware corporation

UNITED ENVELOPE, LLC
--------------------
owns 100% of the outstanding stock of the following:

     Pocono Envelope Corp., a Pennsylvania corporation

WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION
-------------------------------------------
owns 100% of the outstanding stock of the following:

     Universal Folding Box Co., Inc., a New York corporation

WFMI, INC.
----------
owns 100% of the outstanding stock of the following:

     Workflow of Florida, Inc., a Delaware corporation

DIRECTPRO LLC
-------------
owns 100% of the membership interest of the following:

     DirectPro West LLC, an Ohio limited liability company

WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT ACQUISITION II CORP.
----------------------------------------
owns 100% of the outstanding stock of the following:

     WFMI, Inc., a Delaware corporation
<PAGE>

                             CANADIAN SUBSIDIARIES
                             ---------------------


WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT, INC.
- owns 100% of the outstanding stock of the following:

     1186202 Ontario Limited, an Ontario corporation

- owns 100% of the Class A shares of the following:

     1305995 Ontario, Inc., an Ontario corporation

- owns 36.78% of the Class B, C and D shares of the following:

     Data Business Forms Limited, an Ontario corporation


1186202 ONTARIO LIMITED
owns 100% of the common stock of the following:

     1305995 Ontario, Inc., an Ontario corporation


1305995 ONTARIO, INC.
owns 63.22% of the Class B, C and D shares of the following:

     Data Business Forms Limited, an Ontario corporation
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ben Jamil, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Chris R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 21, 2006                 /s/ Ben Jamil
                                        -----------------------
                                        Ben Jamil
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 21, 2006                 /s/ Chris R. Decker
                                        -----------------------
                                        Chris R. Decker
                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


                                       23
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 40 41



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/04 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 04 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Innospec
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick S. Williams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/    PATRICK S.
WILLIAMS           
|Patrick S. Williams                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|February 19, 2010                    



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. §1350 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
No. 50717.

#### Protest 74209-K of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Butler Bros.*(33 C. C. P. A. 22, C. A. D. 310). In accordance therewith the claim at 70 percent under paragraph 212 was sustained. .
No. 6219.

#### JAMES GARLICK vs. WILLIAMS MEDICAL & SURGICAL INSTRUMENT, ET AL.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “A,” No. 91,041. Honorable T. '0. W- Ellis, Judge.

Stafford, Landry & Robinson, for plaintiff and appellee.

James McConnell, Jr., for defendant and appellee.

Dinkelspiel, Hart & Davey, Nix & Tichenor, attorneys.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

This is an appeal from judgments dissolving an injunction taken out against an' execution, taxing certain costs, and regulating certain matters of compensation between the parties.

*93Opinion and decree, December 7th, 1914.

The appellant has filed no assignment of errors, furnished no brief, and favored ns with no oral argument. An examination of the record suggested no error.

Affirmed.
KEVIN KASPER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2716

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

Jesse Smith and Rodney W. Smith of Avera & Smith LLP, Gainesville, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Before the Second Division,

August 1, 1938

No. 39126.

#### Protest 941664-G of G. Hirsch Sons, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was found that certain items consist of fabrics with fast edges in chief value of rayon, Jacquard-figured. The claim at 45 cents per pound and 70 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1308 was therefore sustained.
No. 74-5916.

#### Ledford *v.*Bounds, Correction Commissioner, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Automation and Employment Opportunities for Office-Workers : A Report on the Effect of Electronic Computers on Employment of Clerical Workers, with a Special Report on Programmers

              																	Paschell, William. 						*Automation and Employment Opportunities for Office-Workers : A Report on the Effect of Electronic Computers on Employment of Clerical Workers, with a Special Report on Programmers : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1241*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										October 1958,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4532,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER