alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.55
 ADOPTION OF MASTER AGENCY AGREEMENT
 November 1
 RECITALS
    ADOPTION
     Commission RatesDesignated Market
    
    (percentage of gross written premium)Ohio
    
    New Business: ***%Renewal Business: ***%Tail Business: ***%
 
 ***
    
    Information redacted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and has been filed
separately. 1 of 2




---



##### 



Exhibit 10.55
  COMPANY:
    
    
    
    AGENCY:AMERICAN PHYSICIANS
    
    
    
    SCW AGENCY GROUP, INC.ASSURANCE CORPORATIONBy: 
Its:
    
    /s/ R. Kevin Clinton

President & CEO
    
    
    
    By:
Its:
    
    /s/ Kristina M. Manoogian
 PresidentDated:

    10/14/2008
    
    
    
    Dated:

    10/16/2008
 2 of 2
May 9, 1950

No. 54327.

Suit 4619.

#### United States *v.*The Singer Manufacturing Company.

C. D. 1152 affirmed February 2, 1950. C. A. D. 427.
Exhibit 32.1   WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada (the “Company”) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (a) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: November 8, 2007/s/ Donald R. Mayer
Donald R. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50949 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

CHARLES SAMSON, also known as Killer

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04

- CR

- 86

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Charles Samson has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Samson has filed a response . We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Samson ’ s

response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
June 21 , 2016
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50949 Document: 00513558166 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 50949

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-50949 Document: 00513558166 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27348-27349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9310]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10854]


Iowa Disaster <greek-i>IA-00007; Declaration of Economic Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan 
(EIDL)

[[Page 27349]]

declaration for the State of Iowa, dated 05/07/2007.
    Incident: Winter Storms.
    Incident Period: 02/23/2007 through 03/02/2007.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 05/07/2007.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/28/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an Economic Injury declaration 
for the State of Iowa dated 04/27/2007, is hereby amended to include 
the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Clayton.
Contiguous Counties:
    Iowa: Allamakee, Delaware, Dubuque, Winneshiek.
    Wisconsin: Crawford, Grant.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: May 7, 2007.
Steven C. Preston,
Administrator.
 [FR Doc. E7-9310 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32

                           Section 1350 Certifications

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of DND
Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

      To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 16, 2004

                                  BY:    /s/ Douglas N. Dixon
                                     --------------------------------------
                                             DOUGLAS N. DIXON
                                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Dated: August 16, 2004

                                  BY:    /s/ G. Dennis Key
                                     --------------------------------------
                                             G. DENNIS KEY CHIEF
                                              FINANCIAL OFFICER


                                       41
Exhibit 32.1



   CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL
                    FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
               COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
       THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     I, John B. Nano, am President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of Competitive Technologies,
Inc. (the Company).

     This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended October 31, 2003 (the Report).

     I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
          1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
          for the periods covered by the Report.


Date: December 15, 2003       /s/ John B. Nano
                              John B. Nano
                              President,
                              Chief Executive Officer and
                              Chief Financial Officer of
                              Competitive Technologies, Inc.
99-0008 (La. 4/23/99)

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Stephen J. BROUSSARD.

No. 99-KP-0008.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Broussard, Stephen J.; — Defendants); Applying for Supervisory and/or *881Remedial Writs; Parish of St. Martin 16th Judicial District Court Div. “C” Number 96-174,738; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number KW98-0774

Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; *State ex rel. Melinie v. State,*93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25


                                  AMENDMENT ONE
                                     to the
                          INTERCOMPANY CREDIT AGREEMENT
                                     between
                       ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION
                                       and
                           UNIGRAPHICS SOLUTIONS INC.



     This Amendment One to the Intercompany Credit Agreement (the "Agreement")
by and between Electronic Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation
("EDS") and Unigraphics Solutions Inc., a Delaware corporation ("USI"), is
effective as of September 1, 2000.

1.   Section 2.02 (ii) is hereby amended as follows:

          Effective upon the acceptance for payment by USI of shares of common
          stock of Engineering Animation Inc. under the tender offer by USI for
          such shares, the $70,000,000 limit on outstanding balances of all
          Advances from EDS to USI and all of its subsidiaries (including its
          non-U.S. subsidiaries that are parties to credit arrangements with EDS
          Finance plc) is hereby increased to $250,000,000 in the aggregate,
          provided, however, that the amount of such limit shall be reduced, up
          to a maximum reduction of $180,000,000, on a dollar-for-dollar basis
          by the amount of any term loan facility (including any term loan
          facility with EDS or its affiliates) which USI may obtain to refinance
          amounts outstanding hereunder, the terms of which, in the aggregate,
          are no less favorable to USI (taking into account both the term of any
          such facility as well as the interest rate).

2.   All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
     effect.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EDS and USI have caused this Amendment One to the
Agreement to be executed as of the effective date set forth above.



                   ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                   By:        /s/ James E. Daley
                      ----------------------------------------------------------
                   Name:          James E. Daley
                        --------------------------------------------------------
                   Title:   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                         -------------------------------------------------------



                   UNIGRAPHICS SOLUTIONS INC.

                   By:               /s/ Douglas E. Barnett
                      ----------------------------------------------------------
                   Name:                Douglas E. Barnett
                        --------------------------------------------------------
                   Title:   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                         -------------------------------------------------------
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNumerical Simulations of a Quiet SuperSonic Technology (QueSST) Aircraft Preliminary DesignReynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations were performed on the Lockheed Martin Quiet SuperSonic Technology (QueSST) aircraft preliminary design to assess inlet performance. The FUN3D flow solver and its adjoint-based grid refinement capability was used for the simulations in hopes of determining internal "best practices" for predicting inlet performance on top-aft-mounted inlets. Several parameters were explored including tetrahedral vs. pentahedral cells in/around the boundary-layer regions, an engine axis-aligned linear pressure sensor vs. a pressure box objective as the grid adaptation metric, and the number of grid adaptation cycles performed. Additional simulations were performed on manually refined grids for comparison with the adjoint-based adapted gridsDocument ID20180007206Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsFriedlander, David J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Heath, Christopher M.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Castner, Raymond S.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 30, 2018Publication DateOctober 1, 2018Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2018-219967E-19577GRC-E-DAA-TN59408Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 339442.04.03.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsAdjoint-based Grid AdaptationInlet PerformanceAvailable DownloadsNameType20180007206.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20180005320See AlsoNumerical Simulations of a Quiet SuperSonic Technology (QueSST) Aircraft Preliminary Design20180005558See AlsoNumerical Simulations of a Quiet SuperSonic Technology (QueSST) Aircraft Preliminary Designvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. v. Gerald G. PATTERSON.

No. 98-C-2784.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re Patterson, Gerald G.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Lafayette, Lafayette City Court, No. CV91-0420; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA98-0260.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., and MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
No. 40423.

#### Protests 615469-G, etc., of General Transport Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

The protests were sustained on the authority of *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 48284 and T. D. 49389) as to eheese with covering of fuller’s earth or of lamp black and soapstone.
Exhibit 32.1


                     WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada (the "Company")
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)     the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
        ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.



Date:   August 5, 2005


                                   /s/ Donald R. Mayer
                                   ____________________________________
                                   Donald R. Mayer
                                   Principal Executive Officer
                                   Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32**





**Section
      1350 Certifications**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of DND Technologies, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:




To
      my
      knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
      period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
      November 13, 2006







/s/
      Douglas N. Dixon


Douglas
      N. Dixon


Chief
      Executive Officer





Dated:
      November 13, 2006








/s/
      G.
      Dennis Key


G.
      Dennis Key


Chief
      Financial Officer






33
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-76738, 333-108752, 333-111287, 333-116696, 333-118187, 333-123619, 333-131332, 333-134084, 333-140119, 333-160123 and 333-160126; Form S-8 Nos. 333-58168, 333-100077,333-120061, 333-136126, 333-142938, 333-150769, 333-156035, 333-161559 and 333-166906) of Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses, of our reports dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofInovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 16, 2011
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RICHARD DWAYNE TEEL, JR.,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-11-00216-CR

Appeal from the

396th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC#1206275D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
Petition for Exemption 333

Danny G. McDonald

1243 McDonald Rd

Conehatta, MS 39057

 I, Danny McDonald, hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333. I request this exemption in order to operate 

my UAV/UAS, DJI Phantom 3 Pro Aircraft, in order to provide services for profit to include aerial photography, 

aerial cinematography, aerial filming and photography for farming operations, real estate, and special events to 

include but not limited to weddings, private or public parties/events, business advertising, promotional events.

Background Information

 I own and operate a farm in rural Mississippi and have found the use of aerial filming to be beneficial to my 

farming operation. I would like to offer this service to my neighbors in the farming business, and other businesses 

and individuals in my area that do not have access to this service. I work full-time as a District Safety Officer for the 

Mississippi Department of Transportation. I am a certified National Safety Council Instructor for First Aid and CPR.

Aerial Operations Intention

Provide aerial views of property and farming operations to small operations to improve their ability to manage their 

resources in a responsible and efficient manner. To provide aerial photography and video for business and 

historical records for events held in our area. This will offer a service that is not available due to the rural area that 

we live in. DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAV will be used (Link to manual attached). All flight operations will be 

conducted according to the guidelines set forth by the FAA. The UAV/UAS will only be operated within visual line 

of sight and will not be flown near airports or above 400 feet.

As in Grants of Exemptions Nos. 11062, 11112, and 12645 there is enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned 

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a 

manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good 

cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest. 

Thank you for your attention in this matter. Please notify Danny G. McDonald of your actions, and or approvals. 

Thank you, for your interest in this request.

Sincerely,

Danny G. McDonald

From which the exemption is requested: 14 CFR Part 21 subpart H

14 CFR 45.23 (b)

14 CFR 61.101 (e) (4), & (5)

14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b)

14 CFR 61.23 (a) & (c)

14 CFR 91.7 (a)

14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2)

14 CFR 91.103

14 CFR 91.109

14 CFR 91.119 (c)

14 CFR 91.121

14 CFR 91.151 (a)

14 CFR 91.203 (a)
14 CFR 91.405 (a)

14 CFR 91.407 (a)

14 CFR 91.409 (a)

14 CFR 91.417 (a)

Manual Link:

https://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_User_M

anual__V1.6.pdf
EXHIBIT 23



|Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation's Consent
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   

Union Carbide Corporation:

Analysis,
Research & Planning Corporation ("ARPC") hereby consents to the use of ARPC's name and the reference to ARPC's reports dated January 9, 2003 and January 26, 2004
appearing in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Union Carbide Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.



|/s/B. THOMAS FLORENCEB. Thomas Florence
President
Analysis, Research & Planning Corporation
April 26, 2004 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                                           |  | 

31

---





QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MathStar, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “QuarterlyReport”), I, Douglas M. Pihl, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Quarterly Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               The information contained in the QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | May 10, 2008 | By:    |       /s/ Douglas M. Pihl |
|--------|-------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |              |   |   Douglas M. Pihl                             |
|   |              |   |   Chief Financial Officer                     |

 

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Finalenvironmental impact statement for revision of the Inyo National Forest LandManagement Plan
v 1|v 2|v 3|v 4|
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.105/2:R 5-MB-304-B

Item Number: 0082-A-05 (online)

CGP system Number:0001068284
November 16, 2018
No. 49463.

#### Protest 37365-K of Uddo Taormina Corp. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel an allowance of 2)4 percent was made by the court for items of Italian Pecorino Sardo Romano cheese similar to that passed upon in *Locatelli*v. *United States*(T. D. 49302).