alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **Name                of Subsidiary**                   |   | **Jurisdiction                of Incorporation/Organization** |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Fundtech                Corporation                     |   | United                States, State of Delaware               |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Fundtech                U.K. Limited                    |   | United                Kingdom                                 |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Fundtech                Australia Pty Limited           |   | Australia                                                     |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Fundtech                International, LLC              |   | United                States, State of Delaware               |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Biveroni                Batschelet Partners AG          |   | Switzerland                                                   |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Datasphere                SA                            |   | Switzerland                                                   |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Cashtech                Solutions India Private Limited |   | India                                                         |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Radius                Partners, Inc.                    |   | United                States, State of Massachusetts          |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Fundtech                Germany GmbH                    |   | Germany                                                       |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Fundtech                GmbH                            |   | Germany                                                       |
|                                                    |   |                                                          |
| Accountis                Limited                        |   | United                Kingdom                                 |

----
# C_2016251EN.01002801.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2016 — Grupo Bimbo v EUIPO (Form of a bar with four circles)

(Case T-240/15) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Application for three-dimensional European Union trade mark - Form of a bar with four circles - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rights of the defence - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 251/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV (Mexico City, Mexico) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández Pacheco, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Muñiz Rodríguez and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 March 2015 (Case R 1602/2014 1) concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the form of a bar with four circles as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002I, Alan R. Rae, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of O2Diesel Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:December 5, 2005/s/ Alan R. Rae
No. 54270.

#### Stephen Lincoln *v.*United States,

protest 142608-K (Portland, Maine).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial the importer testified that all of the necessary certificates were produced at the time of entry, including the registry of the cattle in Canada; that the original certificate of registry of the cattle in Canada was sent to the Secretary of Agriculture, who, if satisfied, supplies the certificate; that said registry was lost and the witness had to supply duplicates thereof; and that in the meantime the entry was liquidated. The cattle were entered on November 18, 1947, and the certificate of pure breeding, received in evidence as exhibit 1, was not issued by the Department of Agriculture until February 2, 1949. The importer further testified that the cattle were still in his possession and that they had been used, and are still being used, for breeding purposes. In view of the fact that the importer had done all" in his power to comply with the law at the time of entry, it was held that the cattle are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1606, as claimed.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1497 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend for 3 years 

reasonable cost contracts under Medicare. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2011 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. BENNET, and Mr. 

FRANKEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

for 3 years reasonable cost contracts under Medicare. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Cost Con5 tract Extension Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF MEDICARE REASON7 ABLE COST CONTRACTS. 

8 Section 1876(h)(5)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 1395mm(h)(5)(C)(ii)) is amended, in the matVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:23 Aug 04, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1497.IS S1497

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1497 IS

1 ter preceding subclause (I), by striking ‘‘January 1, 2013’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2016’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of Competitive Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John B. Nano, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                   /s/ John B. Nano
                                   ----------------
                                   John B. Nano
                                   Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                   Accounting Officer

                                   December 14, 2009



                  *
                *****
              **-----**
            **-----       COMPETITIVE
          ****----        TECHNOLOGIES
            **=====       Unlocking the Potential of Innovation (R)
              **=====**
                *****
                  *  (R)  Technology Transfer and Licensing Services








                            www.competitivetech.net

                                    Page 24
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

February 2, 1999


R. Terry Dunlay
433 Lynn Ann Drive
Plum Boro, PA  15068

Dear Terry:

We are pleased to offer you the following adjustments to your employment as
Executive Vice-President of Development with Cellomics, Inc. In this capacity,
you will continue your supervision and development of our Software Division
supervising all activity relating to database and software development, product
management/planning, project development, business development and proposal
generation for our instrumentation for cell-based drug discovery.

Your salary will be $11,250.00 per month. In addition to your salary, you will
be eligible to receive a performance bonus of up to 20 percent of your base
salary subject to the review and approval of the Board of Directors. The
performance bonus will be based on attaining the following goals during 1999:

         (a)      ArrayScan(TM) II Software release versions 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 by
                  June 30, 1999 within budget;

         (b)      ArrayScan(TM) 1.0 Kinetics Software released by October 30,
                  1999 within budget;

         (c)      Cellomics(TM) Store sold to second customer;

         (d)      Cellomics(TM) Screen V 1.0 including Momentum HealthCare
                  component completed by June 1, 1999 within budget.

In connection with your employment, you will be granted an option to purchase
10,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company dated January 15, 1998 at an
exercise price of $0.56 per share. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares
subject to such option will vest on the anniversary date of the grant on an
annual basis over four years from the date of the grant. An additional option to
purchase 4,000 shares of Common Stock will be available as part of the
performance bonus described above.
<PAGE>   2

All other terms and conditions offered in your letter dated January 16, 1998
remain the same.

I am personally enthusiastic about your continued employment with the Cellomics'
team and continuing to help us build an exciting company.

Sincerely,


D. Lansing Taylor, Ph.D.
President & CEO





Accepted:

__________________________________
R. Terry Dunlay

__________________________________
Dated
No. 53256.

#### General Sportcraft Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 134726-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Danny L. Pixler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Certified Services, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
of Certified Services, Inc.



Date: November 18, 2004



/s/ Danny L. PixlerDanny L. PixlerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1432 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the exception from 

the 10-percent penalty for early withdrawals from governmental plans 

for Federal and State qualified public safety employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2011 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the exception from the 10-percent penalty for early withdrawals from governmental plans for Federal and State 

qualified public safety employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF EXCEPTION FROM 10-PER4 CENT EARLY WITHDRAWAL PENALTY FOR 

5 FEDERAL AND STATE PUBLIC SAFETY EM6 PLOYEES. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF RESTRICTION TO DEFINED BENEFIT

8 PLANS.—Subparagraph (A) of section 72(t)(10)(A) of the 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1432 IS

1 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

2 ‘‘which is a defined benefit plan’’. 

3 (b) INCLUSION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.—Sub4 paragraph (B) of section 72(t)(10) of such Code is amend5 ed to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(B) QUALIFIED PUBLIC SAFETY EM7 PLOYEE.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 

8 term ‘qualified public safety employee’ means 

9 any employee of the Government of the United 

10 States, a State or political subdivision of a 

11 State, or any agency or instrumentality of any 

12 of the foregoing who provides police protection, 

13 firefighting services, or emergency medical serv14 ices for any area within the jurisdiction of the 

15 Government of the United States, or such State 

16 or political subdivision, as the case may be.’’. 

17 (c) APPLICATION TO ANNUITIES COMMENCING BE18 FORE THE PENSION PROTECTION ACT OF 2006.—Para19 graph (10) of section 72(t) is amended by adding at the 

20 end the following new subparagraph: 

21 ‘‘(C) TRANSITIONAL RULE FOR ANNU22 ITIES.—Paragraph (4) shall not apply to any 

23 modification to a series of substantially equal 

24 periodic payments which are made with respect 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1432 IS

1 to a qualified public safety employee if such se2 ries of payments commenced— 

3 ‘‘(i) before the date of the enactment 

4 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, and 

5 ‘‘(ii) after such qualified public safety 

6 employee’s separation from service after 

7 attainment of age 50.’’. 

8 (d) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

10 subsections (a) and (b) shall apply to distributions 

11 made after the date of the enactment of the Pension 

12 Protection Act of 2006. 

13 (2) TRANSITIONAL RULE FOR ANNUITIES.—The 

14 amendment made by subsection (c) shall apply to 

15 modifications made after the date of the enactment 

16 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21
                               DAVOX CORPORATION

                SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

                          SEVERANCE AGREEMENT - 2000

DAVOX Corporation ("DAVOX") will provide to you the following terms and
condition of salary and benefits continuation:


    (1.)  DAVOX shall provide a continuation of your base salary and medical
          benefits at DAVOX'S cost, as may be in effect at the time of a
          qualifying termination as set forth in subclause 2, commencing upon
          the date of termination, for a period of six (6) months or until such
          time as you assume new employment, whichever comes first;

    (2.)  DAVOX shall provide continuation of salary and benefits as set forth
          in subclause (1) in the event your employment is terminated for the
          following reasons: (a) economic layoff; (b) downsizing of the
          International Sales organization which results in the elimination of
          your position as Senior Vice President International Operations; or
          (c) reorganization of the International Sales organization which would
          require you to relocate.

Following the effective date of termination, as set forth in writing and
furnished to you by DAVOX, your employment with DAVOX shall cease and you shall
not hold yourself as an employee, agent, or representative of DAVOX.

Continuation of salary and benefits shall further be subject to your compliance
with any existing company policies and such other terms as may be in effect
between you and DAVOX pertaining to the disclosure of confidential or
proprietary information.

DAVOX has final authority to determine all questions of eligibility to receive
benefits under this arrangement and to interpret and construe the terms of this
arrangement.


Approval:


          /s/ Alphonse M. Lucchese                         3/1/00
          ------------------------------------------       ------------
          Chairman & Chief Executive Officer               Date


          /s/ Douglas W. Smith                             01-03-00
          ------------------------------------------       ------------
          Senior Vice President International Sales        Date
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6499.

Entry Nos. 1860; 2213; 2268.

Invoices dated Hanley, England, August 30, 1941, etc.

Certified September 5, 1941, etc.

Entered at San Francisco, Calif., October 31, 1941, etc.

(Decided November 12, 1946)

*Sharretts & Hillis*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Keefe, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the earthenware and chinaware here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. Insofar as the appeals related to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41510 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BENANCIO ALANIS-ZUNIGA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-481-ALL

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Benancio Alanis-Zuniga (Alanis-Zuniga) appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The Government does not seek enforcement of Alanis-Zuniga’s waiver of appeal; therefore, this court will not enforce it. See United States v. Rhodes , 253 F.3d 800, 804 (5th Cir. 2001). For the first time on appeal, Alanis-Zuniga contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C.No. 04-41510 -2- § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and Shepard v. United States , 125 S. Ct. 1254 (2005). However, as Alanis-Zuniga concedes, this argument is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 247 (1998); United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
No. 49455.

#### Protests 948113-G, etc., of Aoki Taiseido Book Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the books in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Aoki Taiseido Book Co.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 217, C. D. 757). The protests were therefore sustained to that extent.