Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-409 and 731-TA-909 (Review)] 

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Commission determinations to conduct full five-year reviews concerning the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on low enriched uranium (“LEU”) from France. 

# SUMMARY:

The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on LEU from France would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         April 9, 2007.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (                        *http://www.usitc.gov*). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at                         *http://edis.usitc.gov*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On April 9, 2007, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act.[1]                                          The Commission found that both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to its notice of institution (72 F.R. 144, January 3, 2007) were adequate.[2]                                          A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web site.                 

Authority:These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 8, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

# Footnotes

1.                             Commissioner Okun did not participate.                     
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioner Williamson dissented with respect to the adequacy of the respondent interested party group response, finding that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. Commission Williamson also found that other circumstances warranted conducting full reviews.                     
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E7-9148 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P