alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9003]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[SGA/DFA-PY 06-05]


Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA); Migrants and Seasonal 
Farmworkers Program SGA--National Farmworker Jobs Program, Housing 
Assistance Addendum

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice: Addendum to SGA/DFA-PY-06-05.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration published a 
document in the Federal Register on April 20, 2007, announcing the 
availability of funds for the housing assistance portion of National 
Farmworkers Jobs Program (NFJP), under section 167 of the Workforce 
Investment Act of 1998. This notice is an addendum to the SGA and it 
adds Section VIII, entitled ``Other Information.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Stockton, Grant Officer, 
Division of Federal Assistance, (202) 693-3335.

Addendum

VIII. Other Information

    OMB Information Collection No.: 1205-0458.
    Expires: September 30, 2009.
    According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are 
required to respond to a collection of information unless such 
collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden 
for this collection of information is estimated to average 20 hours per 
response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing 
data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing 
and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding 
the burden estimated or any other aspect of this collection of 
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the 
U.S. Department of Labor, the OMB Desk Officer for ETA, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT 
RETURN YOUR COMPLETED APPLICATION TO THE OMB. SEND IT TO THE SPONSORING 
AGENCY AS SPECIFIED IN THIS SOLICITATION.
    This information is being collected for the purpose of awarding a 
grant. The information collected through this ``Solicitation for Grant 
Applications'' will be used by the Department of Labor to ensure that 
grants are awarded to the applicant best suited to perform the 
functions of the grant. Submission of this information is required in 
order for the applicant to be considered for award of this grant. 
Unless otherwise specifically noted in this announcement, information 
submitted in the respondent's application is not considered to be 
confidential.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of May, 2007.
James W. Stockton,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-9003 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

[x]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30March 31, 2005

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ___________

Commission file number 0-2666

250 WEST 57th ST. ASSOCIATES L.L.C.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

A New York Limited Liability Company 	13-6083380

(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10165

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(212) 687-8700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ].  No [  ] .

An Exhibit Index is located on Page 14 of this Report.  Number of pages (including exhibits) in this filing:  14 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

250 West 57th St. Associates L.L.C.

Condensed Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months	For the Six Months

		Ended June 30,	Ended June 30,

	2005	2004	2005	2004

Income:
#### Penson & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7455.

Invoice dated Nottingham, England, January 16, 1946.

Certified January 17, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 11, 1946.

Entry No. 738092.

(Decided November 25, 1947)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilsqn, Judge:

In submitting the appeal listed above counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issues are the same in all material respects as were the issues involved in *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the record as thus made, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the values found by the appraiser, less any amounts added on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2016260EN.01005202.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/52

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 8 June 2016 — Massoulié v Parliament

(Case F-146/15) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Parliament - Inter-institutional transfer - 2014 promotion exercise - Request seeking the conversion of staff reports into merit points - Reclassification of a complaint as a request - Article 90 of the Staff Regulations - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2016/C 260/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: François Massoulié (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: V. Montebello-Demogeot and M. Dean, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision rejecting the applicant’s request for the staff reports drawn up since his promotion to grade AD 12 to be converted into merit points.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Mr François Massoulié’s action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Mr François Massoulié’s action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Massoulié is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Massoulié is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 22.2.2016, p. 45.

1

---
No. 47006.

#### Protests 849459-G, etc., of A. E. Andon et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case No. 8,120.

#### The LAURA RUSS.

[Cited in Pent v. The Ocean Belle, Case No. 10,961. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
No. 96-5597.

#### Perkins *v.*Derstein et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
(V. D. 66)

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 105221.

(Decided February 17, 1958)

*Eugene B. Pichrell*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States,*38 Cust. Ct. 508, Abstract 60780, and it has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above remand of protest consists of Prism Glasses and Leather Cases, containers for said prism glasses, which were the subject of a judgment and decision by the First Division of this Court in the ease of *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States,*Abstract 60780, on May 22, 1957, wherein it is stated “* * * and remand the matter, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, U. S. G. § 2636 (d), for further proceedings before a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the imported merchandise in the manner provided for by law.”

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States was as follows:

> United

> States

> Invoice dollars

> Entry No. price Less Merchandise each discount per each

> 105221 (1st 40 Prism glasses 8 x 30_ $55. 68 35 % $36. 19

> (invoice) 40 Cases--.__ 7.20 35% 4. 68

> 12 Prism glasses 7 x 50_ 73. 20 43 % 41. 72

> 12 Cases_ 8. 88 43% 5. 06

> (2d invoice) 10 Prism glasses 8 x 60 MAROCTIT. 86. 40 43 % 49. 25

> 10 Cases_ 9. 60 43% 5. 47

> 20 Prism glasses 6 x 30 BIDOXIT_ 50.40 35% 34. 76

> 20 Cases_ 7. 20 35% 4. 68

> 10 Prism glasses 4 x 20 BITUR_ 40. 80 35% 26. 52

> 10 Cases---__ 5.28 35% 3. 43

> 5 Prism glasses 6 x 30 BIDOX_ 46. 80 35% 30. 42

> 5 Cases_ 7. 20 35% 4. 68

> 10 Prism glasses 3.2 x 14 OBERON. 37. 44 35% 24 34

> 10 Cases.-.. 4. 80 35% 3. 12

*627IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above remand of protest may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and I hold such dutiable value for each of the articles to be as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2015363EN.01002401.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/24

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 August 2015 — Criminal proceedings against A, B

(Case C-453/15)

(2015/C 363/30)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

A, B

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 56(1)(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax to be interpreted as meaning that an allowance under Article 3(a) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (2) which confers a right to emit one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent during a specified period is a ‘similar right’ within the meaning of that provision?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347. p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32.

2

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsProspects for the Development of Fast-Light Inertial SensorsNext-generation space missions are constrained by existing spacecraft navigation systems which are not fully autonomous. These systems suffer from accumulated dead-reckoning errors and must therefore rely on periodic updates provided by supplementary technologies that depend on line-of-sight signals from Earth, satellites, or other celestial bodies (e.g., GPS, star-trackers) for absolute attitude and position determination, which can be spoofed, incorrectly identified, occluded, obscured, attenuated, or insufficiently available. These dead-reckoning errors originate in the accelerometers and ring laser gyros (RLGs) themselves, which constitute inertial measurement units (IMUs). Increasing the time for standalone spacecraft navigation therefore requires fundamental improvements in the precision of inertial sensors. The conventional method of increasing the precision of an optical gyro is to increase its size, but this is problematic in spaceflight where size and weight are at a premium. One promising solution to enhance gyro precision without increasing size is to place an anomalous dispersion or fast-light (FL) material inside the gyro cavity. The FL essentially provides a positive feedback to the gyro response, resulting in a larger measured beat frequency for a given rotation rate as shown in figure 1.Document ID20180006415Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSmith, D. D.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Keys, A. S.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 17, 2018Publication DateSeptember 1, 2018Subject CategorySpace Communications, Spacecraft Communications, Command And TrackingInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2018-219867M18-6944M-1472Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180006415.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■

■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

●

●
Exhibit 32.1


                     WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada (the "Company")
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:   November 10, 2004
                                     /s/ Donald R. Mayer
                                    ____________________________________
                                    Donald R. Mayer
                                    Principal Executive Officer
                                    Principal Financial Officer
No. 40418.

#### Protests 978658, etc., of A. Eckstein & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Yarns in chief value of artificial silk similar to the merchandise involved in Abstract 39472 were held dutiable at 40 cents per pound under paragraph 31 as claimed.
#### Allen L. FEINGOLD, Appellant, v. AMERICAN RACK & STACK, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 98-2348.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 12, 1999.

Alien L. Feingold, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pro se.

Neil Bayer of Sarnoff & Bayer, Coconut Grove, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Allen Feingold, appeals from the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint for property damage to his boat during its storage at appellee, American Rack and Stack, Inc.’s marina. Feingold’s causes of action were based on breach of contract, trespass, and conversion. The trial court dismissed on the ground that appellant’s causes of action were barred by the three-year admiralty statute of limitations provided for in 46 U.S.C.App. § 763(a)(1989). We reverse.

Section 763(a) provides:

> Unless otherwise specified by law, a suit for recovery of damages for person*480al injury or death, or both, arising out of a maritime tort, shall not be maintained unless commenced within three years from the date the cause of action accrued.

(Emphasis added).

As appellant’s complaint is for property damage and not personal injury, this statute of limitations is inapplicable. The statute of limitations is five years for breach of contract and four years for trespass and conversion. *See*§§ 95.11(2)(b) & (3)(h), Fla. Stat. (1989).

We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Because we reverse on this issue, we find it unnecessary to address the other issues on appeal.

REVERSED.

KLEIN, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1500

OLIVIER L. F. ASSER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE TAX COMMISSIONER OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF

VIRGINIA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-03-1613-A)

Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 17, 2004

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Olivier L. F. Asser, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Cameron O’Brion,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Olivier L. F. Asser appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint alleging civil

conspiracy, fraud, and willful misconduct. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Asser v. Tax Comm’r,

No. CA-03-1613-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 309 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 309

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR D.C. SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On June 6, 2008, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on

              

 Rules and Administration of the Senate may jointly designate, the 2008 
District of Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in 
this resolution referred to as the ``event'') may be run through the 
Capitol Grounds as part of the journey of the Special Olympics torch to 
the District of Columbia Special Olympics summer games.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 309

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Walter Thomas Price III, Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of the Partnership, herby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |     |  |                                                                                          
| |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Walter Thomas Price III                                                              
| |  |     |  | Walter Thomas Price III                                                                  
| |  |     |  | Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., General Partner of the Partnership
| |  |     |  | Date: August 15, 2005                                                                    



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extend that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-3