alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, H. Douglas Chaffin, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ H. Douglas ChaffinH.
      Douglas ChaffinChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      5, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MBT Financial Corp. and will be retained by MBT Financial Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6136.

Invoices dated London, England, November 22, 1943, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 29, 1944, etc.

Entry No. 726062, etc.

(Decided April 26, 1945)

*John D. Rode {Jacob L. Klingaman*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *{Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, subject to the approval of the court, that the issues in these appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in the annexed schedule, are the same in all material respects as the issues decided in *United States*v. *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.,*Suit No. 4481, C. A. D. 305, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> It is further stipulated and agreed* that the appraised v'alue of the merchandise here involved, less the addition made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases, is equal to the cost of materials, and fabrication, manipulation or other process employed in manufacturing or producing such or similar merchandise at a time preceding the date of exportation of the involved merchandise which would ordinarily permit the manufacture or production thereof in the usual course of business, plus the usual general expenses (not less than 10 per centum of such cost) in the case of such or similar merchandise, plus the cost of all containers and coverings, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, and plus an addition for profit (not less than 8 per centum of the costs of materials and fabrication or manipulation and general expenses) equal to the profit which ordinarily is added to the cost of merchandise of the same general character by manufacturers or producers in the country of manufacture who are engaged in the manufacture of merchandise of the same class or kind.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that these cases may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

*407On tbe agreed facts I- find tbe cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination bf tbe value of tbe merchandise here involved, and that such values are tbe appraised values, less tbe additions made by tbe importer on entry because of advances by tbe appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 47645.

#### Protest 39826-K of Tice Import Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the beaded bags in question were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 411, as claimed, on the authority of Abstract 46773.
No. 50740.

#### Protests 36961-K, etc., of Wo Kee & Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as the commodity passed upon in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). On the stipulated facts the merchandise, which includes salt as a substantial component part thereof, was excluded from classification under paragraph 5 and held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1413 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1413

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily increase the 
         investment tax credit for geothermal energy property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2011

 Mr. Wyden (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily increase the 
         investment tax credit for geothermal energy property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Geothermal Tax Parity Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT FOR GEOTHERMAL 
              ENERGY PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subclause (II) of section 48(a)(2)(A)(i) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``paragraph 
(3)(A)(i)'' and inserting ``clause (i) or (iii) of paragraph (3)(A)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Williams , Rene e (OST ) b^C^^ A 7)6T-^^7 ^

l^-fSrf ^ Subject : FW : Chisan a Essentia l Ai rService :.;:.. , From : Lindse

yHal l [mailto:lhall999@hotmail.com ] Sent : Sunday , Apri l 04 , 201 0 2:43 P M To : Little , Cynthi a M (DOT ) Subject : Chisan a Essentia l Ai rServic e Ms . Little : I a m a n in n holde ri n Chisana . I d o no tfl yan d nee d t o hav e ai rservic e fo rm e an d m yfamil yt o b e abl e t o ge t t o m yhom e i n Chisana . I als o us e th e mai l servic e fo rm yfoo d supplie s fro m Tol< , alon g wit h ai l mai l tha t I hav e shippe d in . T o los e th e ai rservic e i n Chisan a v^oul d mak e i t s o tha tI coul d n o longe rge t int o m yhome . I a m thinkin g o fmovin g int o Chisan a permanentl yan d thi s i s m yonl ywa yt o ge t i n an d out , alon g wit h a complet e los s o fsupplies . I als o ge tal l o fm ypropan e an d fue l o n thi s servic e whic h i s neede d t o live . Please , pleas e d o no t tak e thi s wonderfu l servic e awa yfro m th e resident s o fChisana , a s w e woul d no t b e abl e t o survive . I fyo u hav e furthe rquestions , pleas e d o no thesitat e t o emai l me . Than k you Lindse yHal l

Hotmai l ha s tool s fo rth e Ne wBusy . Search , cha tan d e-mai l fro m you rinbox . Lear n more .
Exhibit 32



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of InterCept, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Collins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge,



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ John W. Collins                 
|John W. Collins                     
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|March 15, 2004                      



---

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of InterCept, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott R. Meyerhoff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge,



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Scott R. Meyerhoff                           
|Scott R. Meyerhoff                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 15, 2004
TIMOTHY A. TADLOCK, 

FORMER HUSBAND,

Appellant,

v.

JULIE A. TADLOCK, FORMER 

WIFE,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1701

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 11, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Dan Wilensky, Judge.

Timothy A. Tadlock, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
33881.

#### BAILEY v. BAILEY.

Marshall, Justice.

The parties to this suit obtained a divorce in the Heard Superior Court in 1975. The jury awarded the wife $100 per month as permanent alimony and $475 per month for the support of the parties’ five minor children. In accordance with the jury verdict, the final divorce decree ordered the husband to pay $475 per month for the support of the parties’ minor children, but the decree failed to specify the number of children.

In January of 1978, the appellant former husband filed a declaratory judgment action in which he averred that: (1) the parties’ oldest child had reached 18 years of age in October of 1977 and had become emancipated, and (2) the parties’ second oldest child would reach 18 years of age in December of 1978. The appellant prayed that the jury verdict be interpreted as a pro rata award of child support to the children and that he be allowed to reduce his child support payments in the amount of $95 per month as each child reaches 18 years of age or otherwise becomes emancipated. The appellant also prayed that the final divorce decree be amended to conform to the verdict. Other issues were raised in the declaratory judgment petition, but they were settled by agreement of the parties. *Held:*

An alimony award ordering the husband to pay a specified sum for the support of the wife and children cannot be prorated among them so as to separate the amount awarded to each *(Crouch v. Crouch,*140 Ga. 76 (78 SE 408) (1913)), and it does not authorize a pro rata reduction in the amount to be paid the wife when one of the children marries, becomes self-supporting or reaches the age of majority. *Lord v. Lord,*231 Ga. 164 (200 SE2d 759) (1973); *Adams v. Adams,*225 Ga. 375 (1) (169 SE2d 160) (1969); *Estes v. Estes,*192 Ga. 100 (14 SE2d 680) (1941). This same principle applies where the award is for child support to the children as a group. *Edwards v. Edwards,*235 Ga. 199 (2) (219 SE2d 117) (1975). Cf. *290
      *Bailey v. Bailey,*235 Ga. 658 (219 SE2d 368) (1975).

Submitted July 28, 1978

Decided September 28, 1978.

*Henry N. Payton,*for appellant.

*Gus L. Wood,*for appellee.

The trial court was correct in its interpretation of the previously cited decisions of this court. We find no error on the part of the trial court in denying the relief prayed for by the appellant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Jordan, J., who dissents.*

Hill, Justice,

concurring.

I concur in the opinion and judgment of the court. However, it would seem to me that at some point as these children reach majority, the former husband should be entitled to seek modification of his child support obligations under Code Ann. § 30-220. If he cannot qualify thereunder, then it would appear that no great harm has been done by allowing the remaining minor child or children to receive the benefit of the monthly child support payment expended for fewer and fewer children.
DSpace Repository

# The Atlantic Barrier Reef Ecosystem at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, II: Kinorhyncha

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences 
      - →
      - View Item

# The Atlantic Barrier Reef Ecosystem at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, II: Kinorhyncha

Higgins, Robert P.

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.01960768.18.1

Date:					1983

### Citation:					

*The Atlantic Barrier Reef Ecosystem at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, II: Kinorhyncha**Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.01960768.18.1

### Description:					

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCMS-0018-Hi_res.pdf

Size:35.76Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCMS-0018-Lo_res.pdf

Size:5.598Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCMS-0018.epub

Size:5.456Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:ePub

View/Open

Name:SCMS-0018.mobi

Size:9.506Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:mobi

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences  [43]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
No. 43155.

#### Protests 908950-G, etc., of Q. W. Lung & Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of fish in lard with beans the same as the commodity the subject of Abstract 42510. The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
# Un i ted S ta te s Cou r t o f Appe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 24-7033 September Term, 2023 1: 23-cv -035 99-UNA Filed O n: August 2, 2 024 Ant hon y J. Mills, App ellant v

. Mary Lo u S oller, Esq., e t al., App ellees ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Kat sas, Ra o, a nd Childs, Circuit Ju dges J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s o rder en tered Feb ruary 26, 202 4, b e a f

f irmed . A ppe llant cla ims t hatap pellee s con spired w ith a D.C. Su perior Court ju dge to de prive h im o f his d ue proce ss rig hts, w hich t he court const rues a s arising und er 42 U.S.C. § 1 983 . T his claim is ba sed on state me nts m ade by app ellees during D.C. Su perior Cou rt custo dy procee dings. However, wi tne sses a nd partie s are imm une f rom dam ages liability fo r the ir testim ony in jud icial proce edin gs. See Briscoe v . La Hue, 460 U.S. 325 , 33 0-34 (198 3). More ver, th e co ncluso ry allegation s in th e com plaintdo no t pla usibly sugg est a n a greem entto v iolate ap pellan t’s du e p rocess rig hts. Se e B ell Atl. Corp. v. Twom bly, 550 U.S. 5 44, 55 6-57 (200 7). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 28 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 28

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
     should be issued to promote public awareness of Down syndrome.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2007

 Mr. Sessions submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
     should be issued to promote public awareness of Down syndrome.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),  
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a 
        commemorative postage stamp to promote public awareness of Down 
        syndrome; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee of the United 
        States Postal Service should recommend to the Postmaster 
        General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company      for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November 11, 2010 | /s/ Harvey B. Grossblatt     |
|-------------------|------------------------------|
|              | Harvey      B. Grossblatt    |
|              | Chief      Executive Officer |
|              |                         |
|              | /s/ James B. Huff            |
|              | James      B. Huff           |
|              | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 MAR-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                        3,695,787               1,454,456
<SECURITIES>                          0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0                       0
<INVENTORY>                           0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              5,100,920               2,803,522
<PP&E>                                0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                        0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                5,100,920               2,803,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            19,526                  30,606
<BONDS>                               0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0                       0
<PREFERRED>                           0                       0
<COMMON>                              0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                    5,081,394               2,772,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  5,100,920               2,803,522
<SALES>                               0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 17,619                  14,089
<CGS>                                 0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 19,076                  18,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               2,308,478                  73,874
<INCOME-TAX>                  2,308,478                  73,874
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0                       0
<CHANGES>                             0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                  2,308,478                  73,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0                       0
        

</TABLE>
No. 6147.

#### CHAUVIN & CHAUVIN vs. LOUIS BORN.

Syllabus,

Before proceeding to trial a defendant is entitled to a detailed statement of the items of debit and credit composing tbe alleged balance of account upon which he is sued.

Appeal from the 28th Judicial District Court for the Parish of St. John the Baptist, No. 379. Honorable P. E. Edrington, Judge-

C. A. Buchler, for plaintiff and appellee.

J. V. Chenet, for defendant and appellant.

*31Opinion and decree, November 9, 1914.

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion .and decree of the Court, as follows:

The defendant (appeals from a judgment .against him upon an open account in plaintiffs’ favor as prayed for.

The first item of the account is stated as: “March 6, 1912, to' amount forward from old account — $138.25;” and defendant timely excepted on the ground that he was entited to a detail of what this item consisted.

The trial Court erred in overruling the exception.

> ‘ ‘ The defendant was entitled to information of the items of debit and credit of which the account producing the balance was composed, and having demanded it by his exception, the plaintiffs should not have been permitted to proceed further in the cause until it was furnished.”

> Ledoux vs. Coza, 2 An., 395; see also, Schields vs. Richardson, 7 An., 535; Hyland vs. Rice, 20 An., 65.

And a remand of the case is likewise advisable because the condition of the record is such as to leave it doubtful whether or not plaintiffs have acquired by assignment a legal title of the account upon which they sue.

It is accordingly ordered that the judgment be reversed and the cause be remanded for further proceeding in accordance with the views herein expressed and with leave to plaintiff to amplify and amend; the plaintiff to pay the costs of this appeal and liability for the costs incurred in the trial Court to await the final determination of the cause.

Reversed and remanded.