27568 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Notices 

Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) 

operators to provide service to Alaska 

and Hawaii if ‘‘technically feasible,’’ or 

to provide a technical analysis showing 

that such service is not technically 

feasible. In addition, some Mobile 

Satellite Service (MSS) operators and 

Non-geostationary Satellite Orbit Fixed 

Satellite Service (NGSO FSS) operators 

have similar geographic coverage 

requirements. For example, Ka-band 

NGSO FSS systems must provide 

service between 70 degrees North 

Latitude and 55 degrees South Latitude 

for at least 75 percent of every 24-hour 

period in accordance with section 

25.145(c)(1) of the Commission’s rules. 

Finally, this certification will also apply 

to geographic service rules that take 

effect in the future. 

The addition of the certification will 

require modification of the FCC Form 

312 which is housed in the International 

Bureau Filing System (‘‘MyIBFS’’), an 

electronic filing system. In 2005, the 

Commission received approval from the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for mandatory electronic filing of 

all satellite and earth station 

applications. Therefore, all certifications 

must be filed with the Commission 

electronically in MyIBFS. 

This collection is used by the 

Commission staff in carrying out its 

duties concerning satellite 

communications as required by sections 

301, 308, 309 and 310 of the 

Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. sections 

301, 308, 309, 310. This collection is 

also used by the Commission staff in 

carrying out its duties under the World 

Trade Organizations (WTO) Basic 

Telecom Agreement. The information 

collection requirements accounted for in 

this collection are necessary to 

determine the technical and legal 

qualifications of applicants or licensees 

to operate a station, transfer or assign a 

license, and to determine whether the 

authorization is in the public interest, 

convenience and necessity. Without 

such information, the Commission 

could not determine whether to permit 

respondents to provide 

telecommunication services in the U.S. 

Therefore, the Commission would be 

unable to fulfill its statutory 

responsibilities in accordance with the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended, and the obligations imposed 

on parties to the WTO Basic Telecom 

Agreement. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7–9335 Filed 5–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Public Information Collection 

Requirement Submitted to OMB for 

Review and Approval. 

May 10, 2007. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before June 15, 2007. If 

you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contacts listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Jasmeet K. Seehra, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), Room 

10236 NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, 

(202) 395–3123, or via fax at (202) 395–

5167 or via Internet at 

Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov and to 

Cathy Williams, Federal 

Communications Commission, Room 1–

C823, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, 

DC. If you would like to obtain or view 

a copy of this information collection, 

you may do so by visiting the FCC PRA 

Web page at: http://www.fcc.gov/omd/ 

pra. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection(s), contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918 or via the 

Internet at PRA@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1084. 

Title: Rules and Regulations 

Implementing Minimum Customer 

Account Record Exchange Obligations 

on All Local and Interexchange Carriers 

(CARE). 

Form No.: Not applicable. 

Type of Review: Revision to a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents: 1,778. 

Estimated Time per Response: 0.27 

hours—6.7 hours. 

Frequency of Response: Annual 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. 

Total Annual Burden: 39,844 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: None. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

An assurance of confidentiality is not 

offered because this information 

collection does not require the 

collection of personal identifiable 

information (PII) from individuals. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: Not 

applicable. 

Needs and Uses: In addition to the 

existing information collection 

requirements that we previously 

approved by OMB, in the Order on 

Reconsideration, In the Matter of Rules 

and Regulations Implementing 

Minimum Customer Account Record 

Exchange Obligations on All Local 

Exchange Carriers (LECs) and 

Interexchange Carriers (IXCs) (2005 

Report and Order), CG Docket No. 02–

386, FCC 06–134, which was released 

on September 13, 2006, the Commission 

concluded that minor modifications to 

47 CFR 64.4002 are needed to clarity 

carriers’ respective obligations under 

that rule section. 

Paragraph 64.4002(d) is modified to 

require that LEC notify an IXC when the 

LEC has removed at its local switch a 

presubscribed customer of the IXC in 

connection with the customer’s 

selection of ‘‘no-PIC’’ (preferred 

interexchange carrier) status. In this 

context, the selection of ‘‘no-PIC’’ status 

by the customer refers to the selection 

of no carriers for interLATA (Local 

Access Transport and Area) service or 

no carrier for interLATA service. The 

Commission concludes that this 

modification is needed to ensure that an 

IXC does not continue billing a 

customer for non-usage-related monthly 

charges where that customer has 

contacted his current LEC or his current 

IXC to select ‘‘no-PIC’’ status. 

Paragraph 64.4002(e) of the 

Commission’s rules is modified to 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Notices 27569 

include the effective date of any changes 

to a customer’s local service account 

and the carrier identifications code of 

the customer’s IXC among the categories 

of information that must be provided to 

the IXC by the LEC. The Commission 

concludes that knowing the effective 

date of account changes will help IXCs 

to maintain accurate customer account 

information and that including the 

carrier identification code of the 

customer’s IXC will enable an IXC to 

verify that it is the proper recipient of 

the transmitted information. 

Paragraph 64.402(g) of the 

Commission’s rules is modified to make 

the information categories included in 

paragraph 64.402(g) consistent with 

those included in other LEC 

notifications requirements. Paragraph 

64.4002(g) also is modified to require 

that when a customer changes LECs, but 

wishes to retain his current PIC, the new 

LEC must so notify the current PIC so 

that the current PIC does not 

erroneously assume, absent additional 

notification from the new LEC, that the 

customer also wishes to cancel his 

current PIC. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Gloria J. Miles, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. E7–9429 Filed 5–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[DA 07–1706] 

Annual Adjustment of Revenue 

Thresholds 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This document announces 

that the 2006 revenue threshold 

between Class A carriers and Class B 

carriers is increased to $134 million. 

The 2005 revenue threshold between 

larger Class A carriers and mid-sized 

carriers is increased to $7.950 billion. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raj 

Kannan, Pricing Policy Division, 

Wireline Competition Bureau at (202) 

418–1565. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s public 

notice released April 12, 2007. This 

notice announces the inflation-adjusted 

2006 revenue thresholds used for 

classifying carrier categories for various 

accounting and reporting purposes: (1) 

distinguishing Class A carriers from 

Class B carriers; and (2) distinguishing 

larger Class A carriers from mid-sized 

carriers. The revenue threshold between 

Class A carriers and Class B carriers is 

increased to $134 million. The revenue 

threshold between larger Class A 

carriers and mid-sized carriers is 

increased to $7.950 billion. The revenue 

thresholds for 2006 were determined as 

follows: 

Class A to Class B threshold Larger Class A to midsize 

threshold 

(1) GDP–CPI Base .................................................................................. 86.68 .............................................. 102.40 

(2) 2006 GDP–CPI .................................................................................. 116.29 ............................................ 116.29 

(3) Inflation Factor (line 2 ÷ 1) ................................................................ 1.3416 ............................................ 1.1356 

(4) Original Revenue Threshold .............................................................. $100 million ................................... $7 billion 

(5) 2006 Revenue Threshold (line 3 * 4) ................................................ $134 million ................................... $7.950 billion 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Albert Lewis, 

Chief, Pricing Policy Division, Wireline 

Competition Bureau. 

[FR Doc. E7–9305 Filed 5–15–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[DA 07–2006] 

FCC Alerts Public and Merchants of 

Fraudulent Credit Card Purchases 

Through Internet Protocol (IP) Relay 

Service, a Form of 

Telecommunications Relay Services 

(TRS) 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Commission urges merchants to use 

caution in handling telephone orders for 

goods. The Commission has received 

informal complaints that people without 

disabilities, who are posing as deaf or 

hard of hearing consumers, are misusing 

an Internet base telecommunications 

relay service (‘‘TRS’’ or ‘‘Relay Service’’) 

called ‘‘IP Relay’’ to perpetrate 

fraudulent business transactions, often 

by using stolen or fake credit cards. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dana Jackson, (202) 418–2247 (voice), 

(202) 418–7898 (TTY), or e-mail 

Dana.Jackson@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of document DA 07–2006, 

released May 4, 2007. The full text of 

document DA 07–2006 and copies of 

any subsequently filed documents 

relating to this matter will be available 

for public inspection and copying 

during regular business hours at the 

FCC Reference Information Center, 

Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room 

CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. 

Document DA 07–2006 and copies of 

subsequently filed documents in this 

matter may also be purchased from the 

Commission’s contractor at Portals II, 

445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554. Customers may 

contact the Commission’s contractor at 

their Web site http://www.bcpiweb.com 

or by calling 1–800–378–3160. 

To request materials in accessible 

formats for people with disabilities 

(Braille, large print, electronic files, 

audio format), send an e-mail to 

fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 

418–0530 (voice) or (202) 418–0432 

(TTY). Document DA 07–2006 can also 

be downloaded in Word and Portable 

Document Format (PDF) at http:// 

www.fcc.gov/cgb.dro. 

Synopsis 

The Commission urges merchants to 

use caution in handling telephone 

orders for goods. Merchants that accept 

orders made by telephone for goods and 

services should take steps to ensure 

that, for any order placed by phone, the 

payment method or credit card is valid 

and the purchaser is authorized to use 

the particular credit card. In addition, 

there are some indicia of fraudulent 

telephone orders or business 

transactions that merchants can use to 

help determine if an order placed by 

phone is legitimate. These indicia 

include a caller who: (1) Is happy to 

order ‘‘whatever you have in stock’’; (2) 

supplies multiple credit cards as one or 

more are declined; (3) cannot provide 

the credit card verification code number 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES