Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Notices 26427 

that the workers’ firm did not produce 

an article within the meaning of Section 

222 of the Trade Act and that the 

workers did not provide services in 

direct support of an affiliated TAA 

certified firm. 

On May 14, 2004, the Department 

filed its second consent motion for 

voluntary remand. The Department 

issued a negative determination on 

remand on August 2, 2004. The 

Department’s Notice of determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on August 10, 2004 (69 FR 48527). The 

determination was based on findings 

that the workers at the subject facility 

did not produce or support the 

production of an article by IBM and 

were not under the control of BP. On 

December 2, 2005, the USCIT remanded 

the matter to the Department. 

On February 6, 2006, the Department 

issued a second negative determination 

on remand. The Department’s Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on March 2, 2006 (71 

FR 10709). The Department’s 

determination was based on findings 

that the criteria developed by the 

Department to determine the extent to 

which a worker group engaged in 

activities related to the production of an 

article by a producing firm was under 

the control of the producing firm had 

not been met. On March 30, 2007, the 

USCIT remanded the matter to the 

Department. 

The Department has determined after 

further review that during the relevant 

period, a significant number or 

proportion of the subject worker group 

was separated and that the subject 

worker group was working in support 

of, and under sufficient control of 

import impacted BP production 

facilities, whose workers were certified 

as eligible for TAA. 

Conclusion 

Based on review of the record 

evidence, I determine that BP controlled 

the subject worker group and that 

increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with crude oil 

produced by an affiliated facility which 

the subject worker group supported, 

contributed to the total or partial 

separation of a significant number or 

proportion of workers at the subject 

facility. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

the Act, I make the following 

certification: 

‘‘All workers of International Business 

Machines Corporation, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 

who became totally or partially separated 

from employment on or after November 26, 

2002, through two years from the issuance of 

this revised determination, are eligible to 

apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance under 

Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’

Signed at Washington, DC this 2nd day of 

May 2007. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–8825 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Mine Safety and Health Administration 

Proposed Information Collection 

RequestSubmitted for Public Comment 

and Recommendations; Safety 

Defects, Examination, Correction, and 

Records 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as 

part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

conducts a preclearance consultation 

program to provide the general public 

and Federal agencies with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing collections of 

information in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This 

program helps to ensure that requested 

data can be provided in the desired 

format, reporting burden (time and 

financial resources) is minimized, 

collection instruments are clearly 

understood, and the impact of collection 

requirements on respondents can be 

properly assessed. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

July 9, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to U.S. 

Department of Labor, Mine Safety and 

Health Administration, Debbie Ferraro, 

Management Services Division, 1100 

Wilson Boulevard, Room 2171, 

Arlington, VA 22209–3939. Commenters 

are encouraged to send their comments 

on a computer disk, or via E-mail to 

Ferraro.Debbie@dol.gov, along with an 

original printed copy. Ms. Ferraro can 

be reached at (202) 693–9821 (voice), or 

(202) 693–9801 (facsimile). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Contact the employee listed in the 

ADDRESSES section of this notice. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Title 30 CFR 56.13015 and 57.13015 

require that compressed-air receivers 

and other unfired pressure vessels be 

inspected by inspectors holding a valid 

National Board Commission and in 

accordance with the applicable chapters 

of the National Board Inspection Code, 

a manual for Boiler and Pressure Vessels 

Inspectors, 1979. 

Title 30 CFR 56.13030 and 57.13030 

require that fired pressure vessels 

(boilers) be equipped with safety 

devices approved by the American 

Society of Mechanical Engineers 

(ASME) to protect against hazards from 

overpressure, flameouts, fuel 

interruptions and low water level. 

Sections 56/57.13030 requires that 

records of inspections and repairs be 

retained by the mine operator in 

accordance with the requirements of the 

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code 

and the National Board Inspection Code 

(progressive records—no limit on 

retention time) and made available to 

the Secretary or his/her authorized 

representative. 

Title 30 CFR 56.14100 and 57.14100 

require equipment operators to inspect 

equipment, machinery, and tools that 

are to be used during a shift for safety 

defects before the equipment is placed 

in operation. Defects affecting safety are 

required to be corrected in a timely 

manner. In instances where the defect 

makes continued operation of the 

equipment unsafe, the standards require 

removal from service, tagging to identify 

that it is out of use, and repair before 

use is resumed. 

Title 30 CFR 56.18002 and 57.180002 

require that a competent person 

designated by the operator shall 

examine each working place at least 

once each shift for conditions which 

may adversely affect safety or health. A 

record that such examinations were 

conducted shall be kept by the operator 

for a period of one year, and shall be 

made available for review by the 

Secretary or his/her authorized 

representative. 

II. Desired Focus of Comments 

Currently, the Mine Safety and Health 

Administration (MSHA) is soliciting 

comments concerning the proposed 

extension of the information collection 

related to the Safety Defects, 

Examination, Correction, and Records. 

MSHA is particularly interested in 

comments which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
26428 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Notices 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

A copy of the proposed information 

collection request can be obtained by 

contacting the employee listed in the 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section of this notice, or viewed on the 

Internet by accessing the MSHA home 

page (http://www.msha.gov) and then 

choosing ‘‘Rules and Regs’’ and 

‘‘Federal Register Documents’’. 

III. Current Actions 

Inspection records denote any hazards 

that were discovered and how the 

hazards or unsafe conditions were 

abated. Federal inspectors use the 

records to ensure that unsafe conditions 

are identified early and corrected. 

Currently, the Mine Safety and Health 

Administration (MSHA) is soliciting 

comments concerning the proposed 

extension of the information collection 

related to the Safety Defects, 

Examination, Correction, and Records. 

Type of Review: Extension. 

Agency: Mine Safety and Health 

Administration. 

Title: Safety Defects; Examination, 

Correction and Records. 

OMB Number: 1219–0089. 

Number of Respondents: 12,557. 

Number of Responses: 11,502,241. 

Burden Hours: 1,223,104. 

Burden Cost (operating/maintaining): 

$0. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for Office of 

Management and Budget approval of the 

information collection request; they will 

also become a matter of public record. 

Dated at Arlington, Virginia, this 4th day 

of May, 2007. 

David L. Meyer, 

Director, Office of Administration and 

Management. 

[FR Doc. E7–8882 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–43–P 

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH 

REVIEW COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting 

May 2, 2007. 

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, May 

10, 2007. 

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing 

Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. 

STATUS: Open. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The 

Commission will consider and act upon 

the following in open session: Secretary 

of Labor v. Marfork Coal Co., Docket 

Nos. WEVA 2006–788–R, WEVA 2006–

789–R, and WEVA 2006–790–R. (Issues 

include whether an operator may 

maintain a contest proceeding under 

section 105(d) of the Mine Act when it 

does not seek an expedited hearing.) 

Any person attending this meeting 

who requires special accessibility 

features and/or auxiliary aids, such as 

sign language interpreters, must inform 

the Commission in advance of those 

needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) 

and 2706.160(d). 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean 

Ellen (202) 434–9950/(202) 708–9300 

for TDD Relay/1–800–877–8339 for toll 

free. 

Jean H. Ellen, 

Chief Docket Clerk. 

[FR Doc. 07–2321 Filed 5–7–07; 3:19 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6735–01–M 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Committee Management Renewal 

The NSF management officials having 

responsibility Advisory Committee for 

International Science and Engineering 

(#25104) have determined that renewing 

this group for another two years is 

necessary and in the public interest in 

connection with the performance of 

duties imposed upon the Director, 

National Science Foundation by 42 

U.S.C. 1861 et seq. This determination 

follows consultation with the 

Committee Management Secretariat, 

General Services Administration. 

Effective date for renewal is May 23, 

2007. For more information contact 

Susanne Bolton at (703) 292–7488. 

Dated: May 4, 2007. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7–8857 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[DOCKET NOS. 50–498 and 50–499] 

STP Nuclear Operating Company; 

Notice of Consideration of Issuance of 

Amendments to Facility Operating 

Licenses, Proposed No Significant 

Hazards Consideration Determination, 

and Opportunity for a Hearing 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC, the Commission) is 

considering issuance of amendments to 

Facility Operating Licenses, numbered 

NPF–76 and NPF–80, issued to STP 

Nuclear Operating Company (the 

licensee) for operation of the South 

Texas Project, Units 1 and 2, 

respectively, located in Matagorda 

County, Texas. 

The proposed amendment request 

would change the name of one licensee, 

Texas Genco, LP (Texas Genco), to NRG 

South Texas LP. The name change 

results from purchase of Texas Genco’s 

parent company by NRG Energy, Inc. as 

approved by the NRC in January 2006. 

Before issuance of the proposed 

license amendments, the Commission 

will have made findings required by the 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended 

(the Act), and the Commission’s 

regulations. 

The Commission has made a 

proposed determination that the 

amendment request involves no 

significant hazards consideration. Under 

the Commission’s regulations in Title 10 

of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 

CFR), Section 50.92, this means that 

operation of the facility in accordance 

with the proposed amendments would 

not (1) involve a significant increase in 

the probability or consequences of an 

accident previously evaluated; or (2) 

create the possibility of a new or 

different kind of accident from any 

accident previously evaluated; or (3) 

involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR 

50.91(a), the licensee has provided its 

analysis of the issue of no significant 

hazards consideration, which is 

presented below: 

The proposed amendment[s] would only 

change the name of a licensee. The proposed 

name change does not involve a significant 

increase in the probability or consequences 

of an accident previously evaluated. The 

proposed name change does not create the 

possibility of a new or different kind of 

accident from any accident previously 

evaluated. The proposed name change does 

not involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. 

The NRC staff has reviewed the 

licensee’s analysis and, based on this 

review, it appears that the three 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES