alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
	
	                                                                   Exhibit 10.13
	
	
	                              AMENDED SCHEDULE TO
	                           INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
	
	The Indemnification Agreements between Sunoco	 Inc. and the directors and
	executive officers named below are identical in all material respects.
	
	Officer                    Date of Agreement
	
	Robert M. Aiken            February 1	 1996
	Robert H. Campbell         February 1 1996
	Michael H. R. Dingus       January 11	 1999
	John G. Drosdick           February 1	 1997
	Bruce G. Fischer           January 11	 1999
	Jack L. Foltz              February 1	 1996
	Deborah M. Fretz           February 1	 1996
	Thomas W. Hofmann          February 1	 1996
	David E. Knoll             February 1	 1996
	Joseph P. Krott            July 1	 1998
	Michael J. McGoldrick      January 11	 1999
	Ann C. Mule'               February 1	 1996
	Rolf D. Naku               January 11	 1999
	Robert W. Owens            February 6	 1997
	Malcolm I. Ruddock	 Jr.    February 1	 1996
	David C. Shanks            February 17	 1997
	Sheldon L. Thompson        February 1	 1996
	Charles K. Valutas         January 11	 1999
	
	     Director              Date of Agreement
	
	Raymond E. Cartledge       February 1	 1996
	Robert E. Cawthorn         February 1	 1996
	Mary J. Evans              February 1	 1996
	Thomas P. Gerrity          February 1	 1996
	Rosemarie B. Greco         May 7	 1998
	James G. Kaiser            February 1	 1996
	Robert D. Kennedy          February 1	 1996
	Norman S. Matthews         May 12	 1999
	R. Anderson Pew            February 1	 1996
	William F. Pounds          February 1	 1996
	G. Jackson Ratcliffe       May 7	 1998
	Alexander B. Trowbridge    February 1	 1996
No. 43160.

#### Protests 644352-G, etc., of Gerstanzang Werner Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

On the agreed facts it was held that the tax applicable to the hot plates in question for the copper content is three-fourths of 1 cent per pound or 3 percent ad valorem, whichever is the lower, under section 601 (c) (7), Revenue Act of 1932.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8997]



[[Page 26678]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Application of Lynx Aviation, Inc., d/b/a Frontier Airlines, for 
Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2007-5-2), Docket OST-
2007-27074.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Lynx 
Aviation, Inc., d/b/a Frontier Airlines, fit, willing, and able, and 
awarding it a certificate of public convenience and necessity to engage 
in interstate scheduled air transportation of persons, property, and 
mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
May 18, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket OST-2007-27074 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room PL-401), 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the 
parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa R. Balgobin, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

    Dated: May 4, 2007.
Robert S. Goldner,
Special Counsel.
[FR Doc. E7-8997 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
No. 96-5648.

#### Hoyett *v.*Johnson, Warden, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-921 (Review)] 

## Determination 

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on folding gift boxes from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                 

## Background 

The Commission instituted this review on December 1, 2006 (71 FR 69586) and determined on March 6, 2007 that it would conduct an expedited review (72 FR 13512, March 22, 2007). 

                    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on April 30, 2007. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3917 (April 2007), entitled                     *Folding Gift Boxes From China:*                     Investigation No. 731-TA-921 (Review).                 

By order of the Commission.

 Issued: May 1, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E7-8623 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9200]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on September 5, 2006, Noramco 
Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed in schedule I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Codeine-N-Oxide (9053).....................  I
Morphine-N-Oxide (9307)....................  I
Amphetamine (1100).........................  II
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II
Codeine (9050).............................  II
Dihydrocodeine (9120)......................  II
Hydromorphone (9150).......................  II
Hydrocodone (9193).........................  II
Morphine (9300)............................   II
Thebaine (9333)............................  II
Opium, raw (9600)..........................  II
Opium poppy (9650).........................  II
Alfentanil (9737)..........................  II
Sufentanil (9740)..........................  II
Carfentanil (9743).........................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the Schedule I 
controlled substances for internal testing; the Schedule II controlled 
substances will be manufactured in bulk for distribution to its 
customers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with the DEA to bulk manufacture such a substance, may file 
comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration 
pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail 
should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register 
Representative (ODL), Washington, DC 20537, or any being sent via 
express mail should be sent to Drug Enforcement Administration, Office 
of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 2401 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be filed 
no later than July 13, 2007.

    Dated: May 7, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-9200 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26619-26620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-425-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 3, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2007, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with an effective 
date of June 1, 2007:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 203
Third Revised Sheet No. 206A
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 281
Original Sheet No. 281A
Original Sheet No. 281B

    Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed 
to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone 
filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on 
the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before 
the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to

[[Page 26620]]

receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed 
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7a1a2b5a4a8898b8e8982b4929797889593a781829584c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8eeedfaebe7c6c4c1c6cdfbddd8d8c7dadce8cecddacb86cfc7de">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8932 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount ( the “Contract”) Entered into by and between Xiangqian Li and
Shenzhen Branch, China Citic Bank (the “Creditor”) on February 13th, 2009
 
 Main
contents:
 Ø          Guaranty
Contract number: 2009Shenyinsun Ebaozi 001;
 Ø          Main
Contract number: 2009Shenyinsun ZongEzi 001
 Ø          Xiangqian
Li undertakes to assume joint and several liabilities for Shenzhen BAK
Battery Co., Ltd (the “Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards China
Citic Bank, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 150
million.
 Ø          Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty
under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The
guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to
pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in
advance to its original expiry date due to default of the obligor or the
guarantor).
 Ø          Scope ofGuaranty:The guaranty shall cover
all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract
compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation
cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is
incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s right.
 Ø          Guaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.
 
 Headlines
of the articles omitted:
 Ø          Termination
and explanation
 Ø          Payment
on demand
 Ø          Declaration
and guaranty
 Ø          Independent
guaranty
 Ø          Fulfillment
of the responsibility and giving up of the right
 Ø          Amendment
of Contract
 Ø          Effectiveness
and Disputation settlement
 Ø          Contract
period
 Ø          Supplement
articles
No. 40439.

#### Protest 731383-G of Samuel S. Perry (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Akawo*v. *United Staten*(T. D. 48067) the protest was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

November 23, 1945

No. 50701.

#### Protests 11365-K, etc., of R. Maes Export & Import Corp. (New York).

*329Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court's decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32

| 1.   | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August 12, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Martin M. Koffel |   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Martin M. Koffel          |   |
|                         |   | Chief Executive Officer   |   |
|                         |   |                      |   |

| Dated:  August 12, 2009 | By:    | /s/ H. Thomas Hicks |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | H. Thomas Hicks          |   |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer  |   |
|                         |   |                     |   |
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09374]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9105]

Department of State FY 2014 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of Release of the Department of State's FY 2014 Service 
Contract Inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Acting in compliance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the 
Department of State is publishing this notice to advise the public of 
the availability of the FY 2014 Service Contract Inventory. The FY 2014 
Service Contract Inventory includes the Summary Report, Detailed 
Report, Supplement Report, and Planned Analysis. Additionally, the FY 
2013 Meaningful Analysis is available.
    The inventory was developed in accordance with guidance issued on 
November 5, 2010, December 19, 2011, and November 25, 2014 by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Federal Procurement 
Policy (OFPP). The Department of State has posted its FY 2014 Service 
Contract Inventory and FY 2013 Meaningful Analysis at the following 
link: http://csm.state.gov/content.asp?content_id=135&menu_id=71.

DATES: The inventory is available on the Department's Web site as of 
April 9, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlon Henry, Management and Program 
Analyst, A/EX/CSM, 202-485-7210, HenryMD@state.gov.

    Dated: April 15, 2015.
Marlon Henry,
Management and Program Analyst, A/EX/CSM., Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-09374 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135005 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MOORE & CARTER LUMBER REAL Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ESTATE COMPANY, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135005 

 COA: 267883 

Sanilac CC: 04-030125-CK 

ARNO HASSLER AND VIRGINIA HASSLER,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
(Reap. Dec. 9426)

#### Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni Spratt’s Patent (America), Ltd., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 8988, etc.

(Decided May 19, 1959)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiffs.

*George Oochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, present the question of the proper value of certain metal bird cages, bird cage stands, and bird baths.

By stipulation of the parties hereto, it has been agreed that the items of merchandise before the court and the issues are the same in all material respects to those in the case of *Spratts Patent*America, *Ltd.*v. *United States,*32 Cust. Ct. 583, Reap. Dec. 8285, the record in which case has been incorporated herein. It has been further stipulated and agreed that there is no foreign, export, or United States value, as those values are defined in section 402(c), (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402 (c), (d), and (e)), as modified by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, for such or similar merchandise, and that the statutory cost of production of the subject importations is equal to the invoice prices, less discounts of 2 per centum and 2% per centum.

On the record before the court, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of said act (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of *641the metal bird cages, bird cage stands, and bird baths here involved and that such value is equal to the invoice prices, less discounts of 2 per centum and *2yz*per centum.

J udgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 395 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 395

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 24 (legislative day, July 23), 2008

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the printing of an additional number of copies of the 23rd 
    edition of the pocket version of the United States Constitution.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING PRINTING OF ADDITIONAL NUMBER OF COPIES OF 
              POCKET VERSION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

    Under the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, there shall 
be printed an additional number of

              

 copies of the 23rd edition of the pocket version of the United States 
Constitution (House Document 110--51) equal to the lesser of--
            (1) 550,000 copies, of which 440,000 copies shall be for 
        the use of the House of Representatives, 100,000 copies shall 
        be for the use of the Senate, and 10,000 copies shall be for 
        the use of the Joint Committee on Printing; or
            (2) such number of copies as does not exceed a total 
        production and printing cost of $180,949, with distribution to 
        be allocated in the same proportion as described in paragraph 
        (1), except that in no case shall the number of copies be less 
        than 1 per Member of Congress.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Medo Photo Supply Corp. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6444.

Entry No. 700241, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, May 21, 1941, etc.

Certified May 23, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 1, 1941, etc.

(Decided October 17, 1946)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of *378the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases. ,

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.