alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.16



Private & Confidential



Mr B Watt

[personal address information]



1st December 2010



Dear Brian



On behalf of the Board of Directors, I am delighted to confirm that the Board have decided to award you a special one off bonus
to show their appreciation of what has been accomplished and the loyalty you have shown to the Company over what has been an extended and testing period in the Companys history. The Board anticipates your continued loyalty and endeavour over
the coming period as we grow the business both geographically and by acquisition.



The main elements of this bonus are as follows:-



|1. | You will receive a one off bonus payment of $225,000. This will be paid in January 2011 using the relevant exchange rate at the time.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | You are required to use 1/3 of this bonus, after tax, to purchase Innospec stock in the open market. This should be done in the first stock trading window after you
receive this payment. Please make sure you let Nicola Earl in Ellesmere Port have the details of your stock purchase so the necessary filings can be completed.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | You will be required to hold the stock purchased in point 2 above for a minimum of 1 year.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | If you decide to end your employment with Innospec of your own accord, within two years of receiving this bonus, the Company reserves the right to require you to repay
some or all of this bonus payment. Any such repayment will be at the absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board and you will be notified of their decision in writing.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Please sign the attached copy of this letter and return to Cathy Hessner in
Ellesmere Port, to confirm your acceptance of the above terms.



On
behalf of the Board, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your contribution and loyalty to our company to date and to wish you continued success in the future as we focus on driving the business forward.



Kind regards

|              
|--------------
|/s/    BOB
BEW
|Bob Bew       
|Chairman
Exhibit 32.1


                     WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     I, Donald R. Mayer, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of
WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
     June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



Date: July 31, 2003

                                /s/ Donald R. Mayer
                                ____________________________________
                                Donald R. Mayer
                                Principal Executive and Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1359 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1359

    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
  available at a discount to members of the Armed Forces and veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2011

Mr. Tester (for himself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To make the National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
  available at a discount to members of the Armed Forces and veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Service Through National 
Park Access Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL PARKS AND FEDERAL RECREATIONAL LANDS PASS FOR MEMBERS 
              OF THE ARMED FORCES AND VETERANS.

    Section 805(b) of division J of the Consolidated Appropriations 
Act, 2005 (16 U.S.C. 6804(b)), is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(3) Military discount.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall make the 
                National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
                available to any member of the uniformed services or 
                any member of the National Guard or Reserves at a 
                reduced rate equal to 50 percent of the cost of the 
                National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass to 
                the public established under subsection (a)(5).
                    ``(B) Term.--A National Parks and Federal 
                Recreational Lands Pass issued under this paragraph 
                shall be valid for 1 year after the date of issuance of 
                the pass.
            ``(4) Veteran discount.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall make the 
                National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass 
                available, at a cost of $10, to any veteran who was 
                separated from military service under conditions other 
                than dishonorable, if the veteran provides proof of 
                that status by providing a copy of the Certificate of 
                Release or Discharge from Active Duty (Department of 
                Defense Form DD214) or valid military retiree 
                identification card of the veteran.
                    ``(B) Term.--A National Parks and Federal 
                Recreational Lands Pass issued under this paragraph 
                shall be valid for the lifetime of the passholder.''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee Subcommittee on B oarding and Alighting Meeting #7

December 18, 2014 1:00

– 3:00 Eastern 1.0 In troductions 2.0 Approval of the Agenda 3.0 Discussion I tems 3.1 Report from UWE Rutenberg on TCRP Gap Safet y project 3.2 From the last meeting - Is there an International Standard for lifts, or another safet y related standard? 3.3 Develop reasons and benefits/costs for guidelines that are changing

– may need to reach out to manufacturers . 4 .0 Id entify

potential research needs. 5.0 Discuss recommendations to the DOT. 6 .0 I dentify

subcommittee members to write the report to the full committee. Next meeting

– January

29, 2015
No. 53247.

#### Stetson Glove Co. *v.*United States,

protests 851337-G, etc. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

At the trial plaintiff’s witness testified that he was familiar with the merchandise involved herein and also with exhibit 1 in *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). A list of items received in evidence as exhibit 1 showed that the merchandise in this proceeding consisted of gloves similar in all material respects to exhibit 1 in the cited case. *338It appeared, however, that ease No. 8068, listed as being included in entry No. 659, protest 889482-G, was not one of the cases contained in said entry. Upon the record presented and on the authority of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co., supra,*the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the items indicated by protest number, entry number, and case number on the schedule “A” attached to the decision, except as to case No. 8068, described above. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
No. 96-7859.

#### Powell *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Before the First Division,

October 10, 1941

No. 46425.

#### Protests 2556-K, etc., of Butler Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 15, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27264-27265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9267]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD07-06-011]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Little River (S-20) Bridge, 
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Mile 347.3, Horry County, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is withdrawing its notice of proposed 
rulemaking concerning the proposed change to the regulation of the 
Little River (S-20) Bridge. The requested change was to place a twenty 
minute regulation on the bridge in lieu of ``on demand''. The 
withdrawal is based on limited vessel openings, comments received from 
the public, and the addition of a new high level fixed bridge within 
close proximity of the draw bridge which should help alleviate traffic 
congestion.

[[Page 27265]]


DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking is withdrawn on May 15, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Project Officer, 
Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch, at (305) 415-6743.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 3, 2006, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking 
entitled ``Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Little River (S-20) 
Bridge, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Mile 347.3, Horry County, SC'' 
in the Federal Register (71 FR 16527). The rulemaking concerned 
changing the current ``on demand'' schedule to an on the hour, twenty 
minutes past the hour and forty minutes pass the hour schedule.

Withdrawal

    A new high level fixed bridge was constructed within close 
proximity of the moveable bridge, thereby providing an alternative for 
existing traffic and allowing for a reduction of vehicular traffic on 
the moveable bridge. The Little-River Bridge crosses the Atlantic 
Intracoastal Waterway and has an average of fewer than two openings per 
hour. Additionally, all of the comments received during the comment 
period of the notice of proposed rulemaking were in favor of keeping 
the current ``on demand'' schedule.

    Authority: This action is taken under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 
499; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 
1.05-1(g); section 117.255 also issued under the authority of Pub. 
L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.

    Dated: September 19, 2006.
J.A. Watson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Seventh Coast Guard 
District.

    Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register on May 10, 2007.
 [FR Doc. E7-9267 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Skibski, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      John L. SkibskiJohn
      L. SkibskiChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      13, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MBT Financial Corp. and will be retained by MBT Financial Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CAUSE NO. 2012-68212 VANESSA ANDERSON, Plaintiff, § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

V. § § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS AMERICAN RISK INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendant. § § § 295 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW, Vanessa Anderson (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and files this Notice of Appeal pursuant to Rule 225 of the Texas Rules of Appellant Procedure, and all other applicable provisions thereof. In support of the same, Plaintiff would show unto this Honorable Court as follows: 1. This matter was assigned cause number 2012-68212 in the 295th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. 2. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff’s claims and causes against Defendant on January 30, 2015. 3. Plaintiff wishes to appeal all related dismissal of her claim. 4. Plaintiff is not seeking an accelerated appeal, nor is this a restricted appeal. 5. This appeal will be taken to either the First or Fourteenth Circuit Courts of Appeal. 6. A copy of this notice is being filed with the clerks of both the First or Fourteenth Circuit Courts of Appeal pursuant to Rule 25.1e of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 1 ACCEPTED 01-15-00257-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/9/2015 4:39:36 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKWHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff prays that the Court accept this Notice of Appeal and grant Plaintiff all relief to which she may be entitled, either at law or in equity. Respectfully submitted,


## T HE 

## V OSS 

## L AW 

## F IRM , 

### P.C.

/s/ Scott G. Hunziker

_________________________ Scott G. Hunziker State Bar No. 24032446 The Voss Law Center 26619 Interstate 45 South The Woodlands, Texas 77380 Telephone: (713) 861-0015 Facsimile: (713) 861-0021
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 24, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on all counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure as follows:
Arfeo Yllana Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP One Riverway, Ste. 1400 Houston, Texas 77056 Via Facsimile (713)403-8299

/s/ Scott G. Hunziker

_____________________________ SCOTT G. HUNZIKER

3
<PAGE>






                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                Certification of the Principal Financial Officer


                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Vicki L. Avril, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Wallace Computer Services, Inc. (the "Company") certify that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended October 31, 2002 of the Company (the "Report"):


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Vicki L. Avril
-------------------

Vicki L. Avril
Wallace Computer Services, Inc.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


December 13, 2002
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 23

- 00135

- CR

__________________ JAYLAN ROCHARD WILLIAMS , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. F12

- 13932

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
The trial court sentenced Jaylan Rochard Williams on March 24, 20 14

. On May 2, 2023, Williams filed a notice of appeal. We notified the parties that the notice of appeal was filed outside the time for which an extension of time may be granted for filing a noti ce of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a) , 26 .3

. In a response to th e Court’s notice, Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel noted that Williams’s conviction in this case had been affirmed in an earlier appeal and the notice of appeal2 that Williams filed on May 2, 2023, had been filed too late to perfect an appeal. 1 W e dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on June 13, 2023 Opinion Delivered June 14 , 2023 Do Not Publish Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.

1 See generally Williams v. State , No. 09

- 14

- 00194

- CR, 2016 WL 5417449, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Beaumont Sept. 28, 2016, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsConvergence Analysis of Turbulent Flow SolutionsData from the "Turbulence Modeling Resource" website for turbulent flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil is analyzed to determine the convergence behavior of three second-order CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) codes: CFL3D (Computational Fluids Lab 3 Dimensional flow solver), FUN3D (Fully Unstructured Navier-stokes flow solver), and TAU (German Aerospace Center (DLR) 2 dimensional code for unstructured hybrid grids solving the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations or the Euler equations). The convergence of both integrated properties and pointwise data are examined. Several different methods for estimating errors and computing convergence rates are compared. A high-order extension to the Richardson extrapolation is developed that improves the accuracy of the mesh limit values and provides a quantitative estimate of the threshold of the asymptotic regime. The coefficient of total drag exhibits second-order convergence for all three codes, and convergence is monotone over a sequence of 7 grids. Other force coefficients are not so well behaved. The convergence rates of the viscous component of drag on the three nest grids ranges from 3:0 for CFL3D to 1:0 for FUN3D. The three codes are converging to similar but not identical solutions. The largest differences between the codes are in the coefficient of lift for which the difference between CFL3D and FUN3D is greater than 10 (sup minus 4). The best agreement occurs in the viscous component of drag, which is the only force component for which all three codes are converging towards each other at a rate of second-order. The agreement between the two unstructured grid codes is good with all properties except lift converging towards common values at a rate of second-order. No one code was universally better than the other. The TAU code has the lowest error in total drag, FUN3D has the lowest error in lift, and CFL3D has the lowest error in the viscous component of drag.Document ID20180007918Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAtkins, Harold L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 29, 2018Publication DateOctober 1, 2018Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberL-20961NASA/TM-2018-220106NF1676L-31175Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.07.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180007918.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Davies, Turner & Co. *v.*United States

No. 7461.

Invoice dated London, England, December 1, 1941.

Certified December 8, 1941.

Entered at New York, N. Y., January 29, 1942.

Entry No. 735829.

(Decided December 3, 1947)

*Strauss & I-Iedges (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawbence, Judge:

It has been agreed between the parties hereto that the issues herein relating to the above-mentioned merchandise are the same in all material respects as those decided in *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 183, C. A. D. 334, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

Upon the agreed facts I find the export value; as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for determining the values of said merchandise, and that such values are the appraised values less additions made by importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
99-0645 (La. 4/23/99)

#### Eddie James WHEELER v. PREJEAN WHOLESALE.

No. 99-C-0645.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Wheeler, Eddie James; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Office Of Workers’ Compensation Dist. 02 Number 97-02230; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CA98-1082

Denied.

KIMBALL, J. not on panel.
#### *W.*B. Quaintance & Co. *v.*United States

*No. 6833.*

Entry No. 720414.

Invoice dated Nottingham, England, January 1945.

Certified January 1945.

Entered at New York, N. Y., February 3, 1945.

(Decided February 5, 1947)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Tilson, Judge:

This appeal involves only the question of whether or not the amount of a so-called British purchase tax should be included as a part of the proper dutiable values of the merchandise. In the case of *United States*v. *Pitcairn,*C. A. D. 334, this question was resolved by our appellate court in favor of the importers.

In submitting this appeal counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in the *Pitcairn*case, *supra,*and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence in this case.

Upon the facts and law applicable thereto, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the values found .by the appraiser, less any amounts added by the importer under duress. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.