alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.2**

----

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, David John Grigson, certify  that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment  to the annual report on Form 20-F of Reuters Group PLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this  amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to  state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect  to the period covered by this amendment; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the  financial statements, and other financial information included in this amendment,  fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of  operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented  in this amendment.

Dated: 30 June 2005

|        | By /s/ | David J Grigson         |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |                         |
|        |        |                         |
|        |        | David J Grigson         |
|        |        | Chief Financial Officer |
No. 40446.

#### Protest 971836-G of D. & L. Slade Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Evans, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Knickerbocker*v. *United States*(T. D. 48959) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1722 was sustained.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Sec.1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of O2Diesel Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here
      of
      (the “Report”), I, Alan Rae, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David
      H. Shipman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
        November 20, 2007




By:
            /s/
                Alan Rae
            By:
            /s/
                David H. ShipmanName:
            Alan
                Rae
            Name:
            David
                H. ShipmanTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
            Title:
            Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)




This
      certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
      requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
      be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than
      as
      specifically required by law.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to O2Diesel Corporation and will be retained by O2Diesel Corporation
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Sasha Skare, Appellant

No. 06-23-00218-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 186th District Court of 

Bexar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

2021CR3863). Panel consists of Chief 

Justice Stevens and Justices van Cleef and 

Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Rambin. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Sasha Skare, has adequately indicated her inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 1, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### In re William R. BRENNER, Debtor.

Bankruptcy No. 98-10444.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island.

June 4, 1999.

Russell D. Raskin, Raskin *&*Berman, Providence, RI, for debtor.

John Boyajian, Boyajian, Harrington & Richardson, Providence, RI, for Chapter 13, trustee.

*ORDER*

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Bankruptcy Judge.

Heard on May 27, 1999, on the Application of Russell Raskin, Esq., for compensation as counsel to the Chapter 13 Debtor. Upon review of the Application, and using First Circuit guidelines, we find that the request overall appears reasonable as to time expended and the charges therefor. We also find, however, that services rendered on the following dates did not benefit the estate: 4/1/98; 4/2/98; 4/3/98; 4/28/98; 5/6/98; 5/7/98; 9/28/98; 10/8/98; and 10/9/98. These entries total 9.4 hours. Because the Debtor presumably received the benefit of these services, he remains personally liable for the disallowed time entries to Mr. Raskin, who should be compensated for these charges outside of the Chapter 13 plan. Accordingly, the Application is allowed in the amount of $4,830. Because Mr. Raskin received a $1,500 retainer, the balance due from the estate on this Application is $3,330.

Enter Judgment consistent herewith.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00600-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Kristen Gonzales-Cedillo, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CR-14-212985, HONORABLE ELISABETH ASHLEA EARLE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The State of Texas filed a motion to dismissseeking to withdraw its notice of appeal.

The State’s motion to withdraw its notice of appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). The

appeal is dismissed.

 

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: October 5, 2016

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.1


             Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated
(the "Company") certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

..      the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..      the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:   August 8, 2005             /s/ John W. Peters
                                   ____________________________________
                                   John W. Peters
                                   Principal Executive Officer
                                   Principal Financial Officer
No. 43166.

#### Protest 898331-G of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallingee, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of paperweights similar to those the subject of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20). The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Harry E. Gruber, M.D., President and Chief
Executive Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: November 9, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Harry E. Gruber, M.D.            
|Harry E. Gruber, M.D.                
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
DSpace Repository

# Lindenmeier, 1934-1974: Concluding Report on Investigations

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 
      - →
      - View Item

# Lindenmeier, 1934-1974: Concluding Report on Investigations

Wilmsen, Edwin N.Roberts, Frank H. H., Jr.

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.24.1

Date:					1978

### Abstract:					

### Citation:					

*Lindenmeier, 1934-1974: Concluding Report on Investigations**Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.24.1

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCtA-0024-Hi_res.pdf

Size:66.62Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0024-Lo_res.pdf

Size:11.22Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0024.epub

Size:165.3Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:ePub

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0024.mobi

Size:197.9Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:mobi

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology  [60]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
EXHIBIT
32.1







TWL
CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of TWL Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phyllis Farragut,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:           May
15, 2008





/s/Phyllis
      FarragutPhyllis
      FarragutChief
      Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
TWL Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Nonfarm Housing Starts, 1889-1958

              																	Carney, Mary F. (Mary Frances). 						*Nonfarm Housing Starts, 1889-1958 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1260*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1959,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4543,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 70-38

#### Charles E. Culver, PVT, U. S. Marine Corps v United States.

On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief and of the Government Response to Order to Show Cause, it appearing that sub*638Sequent to the issuance of said Order to Show Cause the Convening Authority completed his action upon the record of the petitioner’s trial and has forwarded said record for review by the United States Navy Court of Military Review, where it was received May 20, 1970, it is, by the Court, this 25th day of May 1970,

ORDERED:

That said Petition be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot.

This action is taken without prej-judice to the right of petitioner to raise the issue of appellate delay during the course of appellate review, below, and on appeal to this Court should such appeal be deemed necessary or advisable.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Training Opportunities for Women and Girls: Preemployment Courses, Initial Training Programs

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Wells, Jean A. (Jean Alice), 1918-. 						*Training Opportunities for Women and Girls: Preemployment Courses, Initial Training Programs : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 274*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										[1960],									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5543,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
(Reap. Dec. 9424)

#### The Pantasote Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 872453; 872454.

(Decided May 14, 1959)

*Michael Stramiello, Jr.,*for the plaintiff.

*George Coohran Douh,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*639Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement involve the proper value of certain polyvinyl chloride exported from Italy and entered at the port of New York.

It has been stipulated and agreed by the parties hereto that, at the time of exportation of the merchandise herein involved, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Italy, or for export to the United States, or for sale in the principal markets of the United States, in accordance with the provisions of section 402 (c). (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. It was further stipulated and agreed by the parties that, at the time of exportation thereof, the cost of production of such polyvinyl chloride, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, was United States $0.2313 per pound.

On the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved, and that such value was United States $0.2313 per pound.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the First Division,

September 25, 1943

No. 48803.

#### Protests 83121-K, etc., of Louis Wolf & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, H. Douglas Chaffin, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      H. Douglas ChaffinH.
      Douglas ChaffinChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      13, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MBT Financial Corp. and will be retained by MBT Financial Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Medical Solutions Management Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned Brian Lesperance, President and Treasurer (principal executive officer)and Kenneth
Fischer, Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting and finance officer) of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |  |  |                              
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 17, 2007 |  |  |  |                              
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ Brian Lesperance         
|                      |  |  |  | Brian Lesperance             
|                      |  |  |  | President and Treasurer      
|                      |  |  |  | (principal executive officer)



|                      |  |  |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: August 17, 2007 |  |  |  |                                           
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth Fischer                       
|                      |  |  |  | Kenneth Fischer                           
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                   
|                      |  |  |  | (principal accounting and finance officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6822

MAURICE EDGAR MCKENZIE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-01-4700-9) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 24, 2004 Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Edgar McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Maurice Edgar McKenzie, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); seeReid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 368-69, 374 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McKenzie has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe McKenzie’s notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. SeeUnited States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 496 (2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of- 3 - constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). McKenzie’s claim does not satisfy either of these conditions. Therefore, we decline to authorize McKenzie to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 96-5802.

#### Smith *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.