alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Fluvial sediment in the little Arkansas River basin, Kansas

By: C.D. AlbertG.J. Stramel

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1798B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6041
THERESA MARIE WASHINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA L. HUFFMAN, Warden, F.C.C.W.; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-02-152-3) Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 28, 2003 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theresa Marie Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Theresa Marie Washington, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Washington has not made the requisite showing. SeeWashington v. Huffman , No. CA-02-152-3 (E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 2002). Accordi ngly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016165EN.01002102.xml

| 10.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/21

---

Order of the General Court of 16 March 2016 — Bimbo v OHIM — Globo (Bimbo)

(Case T-528/15) (1)

1

(2016/C 165/27)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.

1

---
ep)
A fy Legend
17) TJ ran piateauPtanning Boundary

Vf: a | —— Perennial Streams
/ ae a
Z —— Major Highway

o¢ — Rim

~) Land Status
BLM

National Forest
Private

State

Lee

- Bat fa
7 -- ‘ 4 ot “i Pap,
4 Ug -_ Se :' Oey yy |
¢ tf = fn Fe , y = (Foe rea /
4 , i ge
: - . fe |
i/o ; T ii) 4 ea
- TENS 4 l y f I A i
ig —~ a) a Y {CEM fis
Z Ly lé e “ 4 use
: Vz Parachute — Nie f ey anes aes
, te iv mee u = } 1 : > A ¥
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the annual report of The McClatchy Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary B. Pruitt,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 2, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    GARY B.
PRUITT
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Gary B. Pruitt Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 8.1



                  SUBSIDIARIES OF YORKSHIRE POWER GROUP LIMITED



                                                    Percentage    Country of
    Subsidiary                                         Owned     Incorporation
    ----------                                      ----------   -------------

Yorkshire Holdings plc                                 100%   England and Wales
Yorkshire Power Finance Limited                        100%   Cayman Islands
Yorkshire Power Finance 2 Limited                      100%   Cayman Islands
Yorkshire Cayman Holding Limited                       100%   Cayman Islands
YPG Holdings LLC                                       100%   Delaware, USA
Yorkshire Electricity Group plc                        100%   England and Wales
Yorkshire Electricity Distribution plc                 100%   England and Wales
Yorkshire Electricity Distribution Services Limited    100%   England and Wales
Yorkshire Electricity Distribution Holdings Limited    100%   England and Wales
No. 45223.

#### Protest 23473-K of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the ring watches in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 37098. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 397 was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 21.1


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF
YORKSHIRE POWER GROUP LIMITED
(AND JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)


HOMEPOWER RETAIL (YE) LIMITED (ENGLAND AND WALES)

HOMEPOWER RETAIL LIMITED (ENGLAND AND WALES)

SCARCROFT INSURANCE LIMITED (GUERNSEY)

SCARCROFT INVESTMENTS LIMITED (ENGLAND AND WALES)

SCARCROFT LEASING (SEP) LIMITED (ENGLAND AND WALES)

YE GAS LIMITED (ENGLAND AND WALES)

YEG FRESHCO. (ENGLAND AND WALES)

YELECO 29 LIMITED (ENGLAND AND WALES)

YORKSHIRE CAYMAN HOLDING LTD (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

YORKSHIRE ELECTRIC POWER LIMITED (ENGLAND AND WALES)

YORKSHIRE ELECTRICITY GROUP PLC (ENGLAND AND WALES)

YORKSHIRE ELECTRICITY GROUP SHARE SCHEME TRUSTEES LIMITED
(ENGLAND AND WALES)

YORKSHIRE ENERGY LIMITED (ENGLAND AND WALES)

YORKSHIRE HOLDINGS PLC (ENGLAND AND WALES)

YORKSHIRE POWER FINANCE LIMITED (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

YORKSHIRE POWER FINANCE 2 LIMITED (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

YPG HOLDINGS LLC (DELAWARE)
Summary of Guaranty Contract
of Maximum Amount ( the “Contract”) Entered into by and between BAK
International Limited and Shenzhen Branch, Bank of China (the “Creditor”) on
March 4th, 2009





Main
contents:


ØGuaranty Contract number:
2009Zhenzhongyinsi Baoezi 0035;


ØBak International Limited undertakes to assume
joint and several liabilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the
“Obligor”)’s indebtedness towards Bank of China under the Comprehensive
Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.:
2009Zhenzhongyin Exiezi 000024) from March 4th, 2009
to February 3rd, 2010,
and the maximum amount secured is RMB 450 million.


ØGuaranty Responsibility: The guaranty
under this Contract shall be guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The
guarantor is obligated to pay off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to
pay off the debt (including the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in
advance to its original expiry date due to default of the obligor or the
guarantor).


ØScope ofGuaranty:The guaranty shall cover
all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract
compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation
cost, lawyer’s fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is
incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditor’s right.


ØGuaranty period: The
guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after
the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement
entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.





Headlines
of the articles omitted:


Ø     
Termination and explanation


ØPayment on demand


ØDeclaration and guaranty


ØIndependent guaranty


ØFulfillment of the responsibility and giving up of
the right


ØAmendment of Contract


ØEffectiveness and Disputation
settlement


ØContract period


ØSupplement articles
**Exhibit32**

 

**Certification**

 

 

The certification setforth below is being submitted in connection with the quarterly report on Form10Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the “report”) to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying withSection 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(the “Exchange Act”) and 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002.

 

A. W. Bergeron, thePresident and Pam Strunk, the Chief Financial Officer of AES Red Oak, L.L.C.,each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of AES Red Oak, L.L.C.

 

 
|   | /s/ A.W.  Bergeron      |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: A.W. Bergeron     |
|   | President               |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   |  /s/ Pam Strunk    |   |
|   | Name: Pam Strunk        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Date: May 10, 2004

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to AES Red Oak, L.L.C., and will be retainedby AES Red Oak, L.L.C., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[115th Congress Public Law 203]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

Public Law 115-203
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
      To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
      hydroelectric project. <<NOTE: July 23, 2018 -  [H.R. 447]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) <<NOTE: Time period.>>  In General.--Notwithstanding the time 
period specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) 
that would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
project numbered 12740, the Commission may, at the request of the 
licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance 
with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of 
that section and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend 
the time period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 
the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by the 
Commission.

    (b) <<NOTE: Effective dates.>>  Reinstatement of Expired License.--
If the period required for commencement of construction of the project 
described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Commission may reinstate the license for the 
project effective as of the date of its expiration and the first 
extension authorized under subsection (a) shall take effect on the date 
of such expiration.

    Approved July 23, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 447:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-170 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 163 (2017):
                                    June 12, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 164 (2018):
                                    June 28, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
|Exhibit 15
|----------

|Report of
        Independent Accountants
|-----------------------------------------

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Certified
  Services, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated
  balance sheet of Certified Services, Inc. as of March 31, 2004, and the related
  condensed consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash
  flows for the for the three month periods ended March 31, 2004, and 2003. These
  financial statements are the responsibility of the Registrant's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards
  established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review
  of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical
  procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for
  financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an
  audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
  objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements
  taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material
  modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated
  financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with generally accepted
  accounting principles.

| | /s/ Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman &
      Company
| | -----------------------------------------------

| | Bridgewater, New JerseyApril 30, 2004
| | -------------------------------------

---
# C_2016191EN.01004801.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/48

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2016 — FU v Commission

(Case F-49/15) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Disciplinary procedure - Disciplinary Board - Member of the temporary staff of the Court of Auditors appointed as a probationary official of the Commission - Change in place of employment - Simultaneous applications for allowance for resettlement in the home country and installation allowance in Brussels - Application for reimbursement of the removal expenses from Luxembourg to the home country - OLAF enquiry - Disciplinary penalty - Classification in a lower function group without downgrading - Article 25 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Manifest error of assessment - Failure to comply with the adversarial principle - New fact - Obligation to reopen the disciplinary procedure - Proportionality of the penalty - Procedural time limit))

(2016/C 191/69)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FU (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, and subsequently by: C. Ehrbar and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision imposing a disciplinary sanction on the applicant in the form of reclassification in grade AST 5, whereas the applicant had been appointed to grade AD 5, for making statements, deemed to be false, in order to receive the resettlement allowance and removal expenses.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders FU to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders FU to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015, p. 36.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Kenneth HahnKenneth HahnChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date: November 10, 2010
98-3206 (La. 4/23/99)

#### STATE ex rel. Nathan JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 98-KH-3206.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Johnson, Nathan; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writ; Parish of St. Mary 16th Judicial District Court Div. “G” Number 132,820; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number KW98 2101

Denied.

LEMMON, J. not on panel.
(Reap. Dec. 9442)

#### R. J. Saunders *&*Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 761355, etc.

*656(Decided June 2, 1959)

*•John Irwin Dugan*for the plaintiffs.

*George Goehr an Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the respective parties hereto, as follows:

> 1. The American Selling Price, as that term is defined in Section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, of the merchandise involved in the appeals enumerated above, for the year herein stated, was as follows:

> Item Year

> Pas Sodium 1958 American selling price $1.90 per lb. less 1% net packed

> 2. Each appeal is limited to the merchandise above described and is abandoned as to all other merchandise, if any, and hereby submitted for decision.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved, and that such value for the item of merchandise involved in each of the appeals herein, at the time of exportation, is $1.90 per pound, less 1 per centum, net packed. The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
### Progress of geologic work in Iron and Dickinson Counties, Michigan

By: Carl E. Dutton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir84

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Security Intelligence
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Ben Jamil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 20, 2004
                                            By:  /s/ Ben Jamil
                                            -----------------------
                                            Ben Jamil
                                            Chief Executive Officer



                                       22
Exhibit 32.1   WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada.  Date: May 13, 2008/s/ Donald R. Mayer
Donald R. Mayer
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer