66700 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’: The new 

information collection requests for Farm 

Loan Programs, General Administration; 

Direct Loan Making; regular Direct Loan 

Servicing; and special Direct Loan 

Servicing all result from expanding 

eligibility for EM to cover equine losses; 

and when approved will be 

incorporated into the existing approved 

ICRs (of the same titles) that will be up 

for a renewal this year. 

On page 57874, add the following 

immediately following the Paperwork 

Reduction Act information for the 

‘‘Direct Loan Servicing—Regular’’ 

(column 3, above the request for 

comments): 

Title: Direct Loan Servicing—Special. 

OMB Control Number: 0560–NEW. 

Type of Request: New Collection. 

Abstract: This information collection 

is required to support the proposed 

regulatory changes that include equine 

losses as eligible for EM. Some of the 

same information collection activities 

that will be used are currently approved 

for 7 CFR part 766, Direct Loan 

Servicing—Special, which establishes 

the requirements related to special 

servicing actions associated with direct 

loans including emergency loans. 

Emergency loan applicants tend to pose 

a higher economic risk of loss than 

those operations financed by 

commercial creditors. Information 

collections established in the 

regulations are necessary for FSA to 

actively supervise and provide credit 

counseling, management advice, and 

financial guidance. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

for this collection of information is 

estimated to average 47 minutes per 

response. 

Type of Respondents: Individuals or 

households, businesses or other for 

profit, and farms. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 7. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 2.5. 

Estimated Total Annual Number of 

Responses: 18. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 26 hours. 

Once this information collection 

request is approved, FSA will 

incorporate this collection into existing 

collections package 0560–0233. 

Signed in Washington, DC, on October 21, 

2010. 

Jonathan W. Coppess, 

Administrator, Farm Service Agency. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27227 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–1084; Directorate 

Identifier 2010–CE–056–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Cessna 

Aircraft Company (Cessna) Model 

402C Airplanes Modified by 

Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) 

SA927NW and Model 414A Airplanes 

Modified by STC SA892NW 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This proposed 

AD would require a complete inspection 

of the flap system and modification of 

the flap control system. This proposed 

AD was prompted by a report of a 

Cessna Model 414A airplane modified 

by STC SA892NW that experienced an 

asymmetrical flap condition causing an 

un-commanded roll when the pilot set 

the flaps to the approach position. We 

are proposing this AD to prevent failure 

of the flap system, which could result in 

an asymmetrical flap condition. This 

condition could result in loss of control. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by December 13, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Sierra 

Industries, Ltd., 122 Howard Langford 

Drive, Uvalde, Texas 78801; telephone: 

888–835–9377; e-mail: info@sijet.com; 

Internet: http://www.sijet.com. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Small Airplane 

Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, 

Missouri 64106. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 816–329–4148. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 

9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Werner Koch, Aerospace Engineer, Fort 

Worth Airplane Certification Office, 

FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, 

Texas 76137; phone: (817) 222–5133; 

fax: (817) 222–5960; e-mail: 

werner.g.koch@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposal. Send your comments to 

an address listed under the ADDRESSES

section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 

2010–1084; Directorate Identifier 2010– 

CE–056–AD’’ at the beginning of your 

comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We received a report of a Cessna 

Model 414 airplane, modified by Sierra 

Industries, Ltd., STC SA892NW 

(formerly held by Robertson Aircraft 

Corporation) that experienced an 

asymmetrical flap condition causing an 

un-commanded roll when the pilot set 

the flaps to the approach position. The 

flap preselect cable connects to the arm 

assembly and provides the flap position 

to the flap selector to close the position 

loop for the flap position. Micro 

switches are located on the arm 

assembly and provide the electrical 

signal for the arm position. 

STC SA927NW and STC SA892NW 

use the original production preselect 

cable. However, the STCs added an 

extension to the arm assembly that 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules 66701 

requires increased travel of the preselect 

cable to obtain the same rotation as 

previously obtained with the shorter 

arm assembly. To obtain the same arm 

assembly rotation, the preselect cable 

must travel approximately an additional 

.75 inch. However, the original cable 

has internal mechanical stops that 

prevent it from traveling the additional 

distance. The cable’s internal stops are 

contacted by a smaller rotation 

displacement of the arm assembly. 

Since more linear displacement of the 

cable is required to obtain the same 

switch action, the internal mechanical 

stops of the cable are reached before the 

switches designed to stop the motion of 

the flaps activate. 

As a result, when the internal stops in 

the cable are contacted, the rotation of 

the arm assembly carrying the micro 

switches stops and the switch to stop 

the drive motor is not activated. Because 

the switch is not activated, the motor 

continues to run until either the motor 

drive shear pin fails, a cable breaks, the 

structural bracket breaks, or the 

secondary switches stop the motor 

before something breaks. The sequence 

was verified on the reported airplane by 

the rigging, installation, and operation 

of an STC production configuration. 

This condition, if not corrected, could 

result in an asymmetrical flap 

condition. This failure could lead to loss 

of control. 

Relevant Service Information 

We reviewed Sierra Industries, Ltd. 

Service Bulletin SI09–82 Series–1, Rev. 

IR, dated September 8, 2010. The 

service information describes 

procedures for inspecting the flap 

system, installing a new preselect cable 

with increased internal stroke, making 

additional component modifications, 

and installing and rigging the flap 

control system. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of the same 

type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

This proposed AD would require 

accomplishing the actions specified in 

the service information described 

previously. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 150 airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on 

U.S. 

operators 

Inspect the flap system and modify/replace the 

flap preselect control cable.

20 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,700 .............. $1,000 $2,700 $405,000 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

Cessna Aircraft Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2010–1084; Directorate Identifier 2010– 

CE–056–AD. 

Comments Due Date 

(a) We must receive comments by 

December 13, 2010. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Cessna Aircraft 

Company (Cessna) Model 402C airplanes 

modified by Supplemental Type Certificate 

(STC) SA927NW and Model 414A airplanes 

modified by STC SA892NW, all serial 

numbers, that are certificated in any category. 

Subject 

(d) Joint Aircraft System Component 

(JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 57, Wings. 

Unsafe Condition 

(e) This AD was prompted by a report of 

a Cessna Model 414A airplane modified by 

STC SA892NW that experienced an 

asymmetrical flap condition causing an uncommanded roll when the pilot set the flaps 

to the approach position. We are issuing this 

AD to prevent failure of the flap system, 

which could result in an asymmetrical flap 

condition. This condition could result in loss 

of control. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS

66702 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 209 / Friday, October 29, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

1 16 U.S.C. 824o. 

2The Commission certified NERC as the ERO in 

July 2006. North American Electric Reliability 

Corp., 116 FERC ¶ 61,062 (ERO Certification Order), 

order on reh’g and compliance, 117 FERC ¶ 61,126 

(2006), aff’d sub nom. Alcoa, Inc. v. FERC, 564 F.3d 

1342 (DC Cir. 2009). 

3 Mandatory Reliability Standards for the BulkPower System, Order No. 693, FERC Stats. & Regs. 

¶ 31,242, order on reh’g, Order No. 693–A, 120 

FERC ¶ 61,053 (2007). 

Compliance 

(f) Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

Required Actions 

(g) Within 60 days after the effective date 

of this AD, do a complete inspection of the 

flap system following the Inspection 

Instructions section of Sierra Industries, Ltd. 

Service Bulletin SI09–82 Series–1, Rev. IR, 

dated September 8, 2010. 

(h) Before further flight after the inspection 

required in paragraph (g) of this AD where 

any damage to the flap bellcrank or bellcrank 

mounting structure is found, repair the 

damage and modify the flap control system 

following the Accomplishment Instructions 

of Sierra Industries, Ltd. Service Bulletin 

SI09–82 Series–1, Rev. IR, dated September 

8, 2010. 

(i) Within 180 days after the effective date 

of this AD where damage to the flap 

bellcrank or bellcrank mounting structure is 

not found during the inspection required in 

paragraph (g) of the AD, modify the flap 

control system following the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Sierra 

Industries, Ltd. Service Bulletin SI09–82 

Series–1, Rev. IR, dated September 8, 2010. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(j)(1) The Manager, Fort Worth Airplane 

Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in the 

Related Information section of this AD. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your Principal Maintenance Inspector 

or Principal Avionics Inspector, as 

appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, 

your local Flight Standards District Office. 

Related Information 

(k) For more information about this AD, 

contact Werner Koch, Aerospace Engineer, 

Fort Worth Airplane Certification Office, 

FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, 

Texas 76137; phone: (817) 222–5133; fax: 

(817) 222–5960; e-mail: 

werner.g.koch@faa.gov. 

(l) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Sierra Industries, Ltd., 122 

Howard Langford Drive, Uvalde, Texas 

78801; telephone: 888–835–9377; e-mail: 

info@sijet.com; Internet: http:// 

www.sijet.com. You may review copies of the 

referenced service information at the FAA, 

Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information 

on the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 816–329–4148. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on 

October 25, 2010. 

John Colomy, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–27460 Filed 10–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

18 CFR Part 40 

[Docket No. RM09–19–000] 

Western Electric Coordinating Council; 

Qualified Transfer Path Unscheduled 

Flow Relief Regional Reliability 

Standard 

October 21, 2010. 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, Energy. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: Under section 215 of the 

Federal Power Act, the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (Commission) 

proposes to approve regional Reliability 

Standard IRO–006–WECC–1 (Qualified 

Transfer Path Unscheduled Flow Relief) 

submitted to the Commission for 

approval by the North American Electric 

Reliability Corporation. While we 

propose to approve the regional 

Reliability Standard, as discussed in 

this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 

IRO–006–WECC–1 raises some concerns 

about which the Commission requests 

additional information. Depending upon 

the responses received, in the Final Rule 

the Commission may, as a separate 

action under section 215(d)(5) of the 

FPA, direct the Western Electricity 

Coordinating Council to develop 

modifications to the regional Reliability 

Standard to address the issues 

identified. 

DATES: Comments are due December 28, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons may 

submit comments, identified by Docket 

No. RM09–19–000, by any of the 

following methods: 

• Agency Web Site: http:// 

www.ferc.gov. Documents created 

electronically using word processing 

software should be filed in native 

applications or print-to-PDF format and 

not in a scanned format. 

• Mail/Hand Delivery. Commenters 

unable to file comments electronically 

must mail or hand deliver an original 

copy of their comments to: Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 

Secretary of the Commission, 888 First 

Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

These requirements can be found on the 

Commission’s Web site, see, e.g., the 

‘‘Quick Reference Guide for Paper 

Submissions,’’ available at http:// 

www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp or 

via phone from FERC Online Support at 

202–502–6652 or toll-free at 1–866– 

208–3676. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mindi Sauter (Legal Information), Office 

of the General Counsel, Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426, (202) 502–6830. 

Danny Johnson (Technical Information), 

Office of Electric Reliability, Division 

of Reliability Standards, Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426, (202) 502–8892. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

1. Under section 215 of the Federal 

Power Act (FPA),1 the Commission 

proposes to approve regional Reliability 

Standard IRO–006–WECC–1 (Qualified 

Transfer Path Unscheduled Flow Relief) 

submitted to the Commission for 

approval by the North American Electric 

Reliability Corporation (NERC), the 

Commission-certified Electric 

Reliability Organization (ERO). While 

we propose to approve the regional 

Reliability Standard, as discussed in 

this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 

IRO–006–WECC–1 raises some concerns 

about which the Commission requests 

additional information. Depending upon 

the responses received, the Commission 

may, in the Final Rule, direct the 

Western Electricity Coordinating 

Council (WECC) to develop 

modifications to the regional Reliability 

Standard to address the issues 

identified. 

I. Background 

A. Section 215 of the FPA and NERC 

Reliability Standard IRO–006 

2. Section 215 of the FPA requires a 

Commission-certified ERO to develop 

mandatory and enforceable Reliability 

Standards, which are subject to 

Commission review and approval.2

Approved Reliability Standards are 

enforced by the ERO, subject to 

Commission oversight, or by the 

Commission independently. 

3. On March 16, 2007, the 

Commission issued Order No. 693 

approving 83 Reliability Standards 

proposed by NERC, including 

Reliability Standard IRO–006–3, titled 

‘‘Reliability Coordination— 

Transmission Loading Relief.’’ 3 In 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS