alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, H. Douglas Chaffin, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ H. Douglas Chaffin
-------------------------------------
H. Douglas Chaffin
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ROSHA CHARLES WILLIAMS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 22 WM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 31st day of March, 2016, the Petition for Assump tion of** 

**Jurisdiction and Consolidation is** DISMISSED

**.** See Commonwealth v. Ali **, 10 A.3d 282**

**(Pa. 2010) (providing that hybrid representation is n ot permitted). The Prothonotary is** 

DIRECTED **to forward the filing to counsel of record.**
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 91 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26832-26833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Notice of Cancellation of Natural Resource Damage Assessment and 
Restoration Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Natural Resource Damage Assessment and 
Restoration Program Office, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice; FACA Committee Meeting Cancellation Announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: At the May 1, 2007 meeting of the Department's Natural 
Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Advisory Committee, the 
Committee reached closure on the final report, which contains the 
Committee's recommendations to the Department. Therefore, because the 
Committee has completed its work, as noted in the April 16, 2007 
Federal Register Notice (Vol. 72, No. 72, page 19014), there will be no 
need for the Committee to meet on May 15-17 in Lakewood, Colorado.
    Document Availability: The Committee and the public can find 
helpful background information at the Restoration Program Web site 
http://

[[Page 26833]]

restoration.doi.gov. Minutes from prior Committee meetings, 
subcommittee reports and presentations, reference materials, and the 
Committee report are all available online at http://restoration.doi.gov/faca.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Glomb, U.S. Department of the 
Interior, Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Program, 
Mail Stop MIB 4449, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240; phone 
202-208-4863; fax 202-208-2681; or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e4d4a5b485b61595251535c7e57514d105a515710595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9daddccdfccf6cec5c6c4cbe9c0c6da87cdc6c087cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>

    Dated: May 8, 2007.
Frank M. DeLuise,
Designated Federal Officer, DOI Natural Resource Damage Assessment and 
Restoration Advisory Committee.
 [FR Doc. E7-9118 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

January 28, 2010

Mr. Richard M. Grubel

Senior Vice President

The PBSJ Corporation

2001 NW 107thAvenue

Miami, FL 33172

Consent of Independent Appraisal Firm

We hereby consent to the reference to Willamette Management Associates and to the incorporation of information contained in our Valuation Report dated
January 18, 2010 in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The PBSJ Corporation for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, to which this consent is an exhibit.

Sincerely,

|                  
|------------------
|                  
|LOGO              
|                  
|Malcolm R. Hartman
|Principal
#### Salvatore MIGNANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

Docket No. 04-6153.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Sept. 22, 2005.

David A. Bythewood, Bythewood and Associates, Garden City, NY, for Appellant.

Jo Ann M. Navickas, Assistant United States Attorney (Emily Berger, Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, on the brief), United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellee.

PRESENT: McLAUGHLIN, CABRANES Circuit Judges and MUEASEY * District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Michael B. Mukasey, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

In 1996, petitioner, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, pleaded guilty to participating in an illegal firearms dealing operation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1)(A). He was sentenced principally to four years of probation. After completing his sentence, petitioner faced deportation as an aggravated felon and a purveyor of unlawful weapons, *see*8 U.S.C. §§ 1227(a)(2) (A) (in), (a)(2)(C), and he sought a writ of error coram nobis to vacate his conviction. The District Court denied the petition on November 4, 2004. On appeal, petitioner contends that the District Court erred in concluding that the petition was untimely and that it did not demonstrate sufficient compelling circumstances to warrant its granting.1

Having considered the submissions of the parties and heard oral argument, we conclude, for substantially the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thoughtful opinion dated November 4, 2004, *see**399J.A. 112-125, that denial of the petition was proper. Accordingly, the order of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

1

. To merit a writ of error coram nobis, a petitioner must show that:

> 1) there are circumstances compelling such action to achieve justice, 2) sound reasons exist for failure to seek appropriate earlier relief, and 3) the petitioner continues to suffer legal consequences from his conviction that may be remedied by granting of the writ.

*United States v. Mandanici,*205 F.3d 519, 524 (2d Cir.2000) (quotation marks and citation omitted).

Petitioner has argued that the possibility of his deportation amounts to a continuing legal consequence that satisfies the third prong of the required showing. As the District Court did, we conclude that dismissal of the petition was proper without reaching that issue.
No. 96-5567.

#### Jeffries *v.*Oklahoma.

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-408-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request for Waiver

May 9, 2007.
    Take notice that on April 27, 2007, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern) tendered for filing a request for waiver of Commission's 
regulations to allow a permanent capacity release to be effective on 
June 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated 
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1979483929ebfbdb8bfb482a4a1a1bea3a591b7b4a3b2ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="377172657478595b5e595264424747584543775152455419505841">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Intervention and Protest Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time May 16, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-9359 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
33931.

#### DAVIDSON v. LOVETT et al.

Jordan, Justice.

Appellant sought a 1978 beer and wine license from the Laurens County Board of Commissioners. After denial of the application, he brought a petition for mandamus against the commissioners. This was denied by the trial court and he appeals.

The facts were stipulated and undisputed. Appellant’s place of business is located within 100 yards of the "school grounds” of East Laurens High School, but is more than 100 yards from the "school building” itself.

Code § 58-724.1 states that "It shall be illegal for any person to sell either beer or wine at a place within 100 yards of any *school*or *schoolhouse*in this State.” (Emphasis supplied.) Appellant contends that since the caption of the Act (Ga. L. 1945, p. 447) uses the words "school building or schoolhouse” that the distance must be measured from the building housing the school.

The learned trial judge concluded that the "General Assembly intended to establish an area between our schools and businesses which sell beer and wine. A reasonable interpretation of legislative intent necessarily requires that the 100 yard barrier apply to *schools*rather than school buildings. The restriction of sale of beer near schools has no relationship to the *building*but to the *occupants.*Since the students may receive instructions *376and congregate on the school premises it is the legislative intent that beer and wine not be sold within 100 yards of the instructional premises.”

Submitted August 18, 1978

Decided October 17, 1978.

*Jones, Jones & Hilburn, James V. Hilburn,*for appellant.

*Dubignion Douglas, Green & Tribble, Leon Green,*for appellees.

We agree with this reasoning and affirm. A "school” is composed of instructors and pupils and may be conducted indoors or outdoors. A "building” merely facilitates the instruction.

The statute is not unconstitutional based on the contention that it "contains matter different from what is expressed in the title thereof.” See *Cady v. Jardine,*185 Ga. 9 (193 SE 869) (1937).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Nichols, C. J., and Hall, J., who dissent.*
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Distribution and abundance offishes and invertebrates in West Coast estuaries [electronic resource].**
 
v1|2005|
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.402:ES 8/4/V.1-2

Item Number:0192 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000802079

 
July 13, 2018
No. 74-901.

#### Holman et al. *v.*Coie et al.

*

See also note, *supra,*p. 968.

Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.*
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Harry Miller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofMedina Coffee, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andhave:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date ofthis quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors andthe audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changesin internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affectinternal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

Date: August 14, 2003

 /s/ Harry Miller**By**:_____________________________**Harry Miller, President, CEO, CFO & Sole Director**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,242
<PP&E>                                          85,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,832
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,242
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,733
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    78
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 40450.

#### Protests 420706-G, etc., of Weiss & Biheller et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel bottles, boxes, brush tubes, droppers, pomade box, powder box, powder jars, soap tubes,' and tooth tubes chiefly used for utilitarian purposes in the kitchen or household, and atomizers the same as those passed upon in *Rice*v. *United States*(T. D. 49373) were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|               |  |  |  |                                                                                            
|-------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | 
|March 16, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    J. JOSEPH
KIM                                                                       
|               |  |  |  | J. Joseph Kim President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|               |  | 
|               |  |  |  | /s/    PETER
KIES                                                                          
|               |  |  |  | Peter Kies Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MathStar, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Quarterly Report”),I, Douglas M. Pihl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1.     | The  Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     | The  information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.      |

 
| Date:   August 11, 2008 | By:    |       /s/  Douglas M. Pihl |
|-----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   |                                                     |   Douglas  M. Pihl |
|                              |   |                                                     |   Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 96-7828.

#### Morrison *v.*United States.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.