alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (Credit Facility Agreement) Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the Company) and Shenzhen Hi-Tech District Branch, Industrial Bank CO. Ltd
(the Creditor) Dated December 26, 2010

Main articles:

- Contract number: Xingyinshen Gaoxinqu Shouxinzi(2010)013;
- Maximum amount of credit facilities to be provided: RMB 62.5 million;
- Term: from December 26, 2010 to December 26, 2011;
- Purpose of the loan is to provide working capital for the Company;
- Remedies in the event of breach of contract include adjustment of the credit amount, suspension of credit, imposition of punitive interest and overdue interest, an increase of guarantee deposit and the call back of loan principal and interest before
maturity.

Headlines of the articles omitted

- Termination and explanation
- Procedure on using the comprehensive credit facility
- Guarantee
- Rights and obligations of the Creditor
- Declaration and undertaking of the Company
- Obligations of the Company
- Instances of Breach of Contract and its Liability
- Continuity of Obligations
- Disputation settlement
- Validity
- Supplement articles

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT INCLUDED IN ITS FIRST QUARTER REPORT TO
SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      92,824,000
<SECURITIES>                                14,880,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              117,484,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (3,014,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 64,280,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           300,940,000
<PP&E>                                     167,334,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (85,038,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             457,365,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       72,914,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   164,054,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 204,511,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               457,365,000
<SALES>                                     95,025,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            96,263,000
<CGS>                                       63,237,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               82,047,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,797,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,324,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,321,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,003,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,003,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.09


</TABLE>
99-0644 (La. 4/23/99)

#### SOUTH CENTRAL BELL v. MILTON J. WOMACK & ASSOCIATES, Inc., et al.

No. 99-C-0644.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: South Central Bell d/b/a; Bell-south Telecommunications; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of East Baton Rouge 19th Judicial District Court Div. “M” Number *890384-978; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CA97 2413

Denied.

LEMMON, J. not on panel.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Celebrating Trailblazing Women

By Irene SmithDLA Energy Public Affairs

                FORT BELVOIR, Virginia  –              here 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

Women's History MonthDLA Energy
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Scott Epperson, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GSMortgage Securities Trust 2016-GS2 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as ServicingFunction Participant for the Certificate Administrator, and Computershare TrustCompany, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for theCustodian.

 

 

 

Dated: March 14, 2024

 

 

/s/ScottEpperson

ScottEpperson

ChiefExecutive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCryogenic Parametric Characterization of Gallium Nitride SwitchesThis report presents the parametric characterization results of four GaN field-effect transistor (FET) devices from three manufacturers, one of which is a cascode device, and compares those results to a Si power metal-oxide-semiconductor fieldeffect transistor (MOSFET) and a SiC power MOSFET. The devices were first characterized at ambient temperature, then at cryogenic temperatures down to -196 C (LN2 temperature), and finally at ambient temperature again in the event that the device parameters were permanently affected by the cryogenic temperatures. In general, the results indicate that the GaN devices show significant improvement overall at cryogenic temperatures in the parameters characterized, such as onresistance and leakage currents, compared to the Si and SiC devices. The results show that the SiC device tested should not be used at cryogenic temperatures due to the significant increase in on-resistance. The results also show that the GaN and Si parameters characterized were either not affected by the cryogenic temperatures or changed by no more than +/-20 percent post LN2 submersion. The device that exhibited the most parametric change post LN2 submersion was the SiC power MOSFET in its leakage currents.Document ID20180005716Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsGonzalez, Marcelo C.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Kohlman, Lee W.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Trunek, Andrew J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 1, 2018Publication DateOctober 1, 2018Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN57157E-19579NASA/TP-2018-219973Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 081876.02.03.05.02.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180005716.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Security Intelligence
      Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Ben Jamil, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
      Chris R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 19, 2007




/s/
                Ben JamilBen
                Jamil, Chief Executive Officer/s/
                Chris R. DeckerChris
                R. Decker, Chief Financial Officer





This
      certification shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 48792.

#### Protest 803900-G/10524 of Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.,

C. D. 791. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
No. 99-60581 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60581 Summary Calendar

DARREN TOLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MARK STEED et al., Defendants; MARK STEED, as trooper for the Mississippi Highway Safety Patrol, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:98-CV-224-D-A

-------------------- May 2, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Darren Toler argues that the district court erred in

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging that without a

warrant or probable cause he was illegally arrested and his person

and property were illegally searched by defenda nt Steed. Toler

also ar gues that his constitutional rights were violated by

defendant Steed’s failure to advise him of the charge for which he

was being arrested. Having considered the parties’ briefs,

pl eadings, and summary judgment evidence, we AFFIRM the districtNo. 99-60581 -2-

court’s opinion for essentially the same reasons as presented

below.

AFFIRMED.
Before the Third Division,

January 12, 1939

No. 40412.

#### Protests 774788-G, etc., of J. T. Ball et al. (Cleveland, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael Buenzow, certifythat: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form10-K/A of School Specialty, Inc.; 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
Date: May 19, 2020  
/s/ Michael Buenzow
  Michael Buenzow  
Interim Chief Executive Officer

(PrincipalExecutive Officer)
**
Case No. 14,007.

#### THORPE et al. v. SIMMONS.

12 Cranch, C. C. 195.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1819.

Deposition — Requisites—Magistrate’s Certificate.

In taking ex parte depositions under the act of congress, the requisites of the act must be strictly pursued.

[Suit by Thorpe & Burton against William Simmons.]

THE COURT

(nem. con.) rejected a deposition taken under the act of congress of 1789 (1 Stat. 73), because the magistrate certified that the form (not “the same” which are words of the act), was reduced to writing by him, and signed by the witness.
#### Bobby R. COLYER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 73163.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 1, 1998.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 26, 1998.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and CRANDALL and AHRENS, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Bobby R. Colyer, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Before the Second Division,

May 20, 1952

No. 56703.

protests 120017-K and 124405-K (Los Angeles).

#### E. F. Stanton and Overseas Trading Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed—Taxpayer Burden Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted in San Diego, California. The TAP will be discussing issues pertaining to increasing compliance and lessening the burden for Small Business/Self Employed individuals. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Friday, June 8 and Saturday, June, 9, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed—Taxpayer Burden Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Friday, June 8, 2007 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Saturday, June 9, 2007 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. PDT at the Hilton San Diego Airport Hotel located at 1960 Harbor Island Drive, San Diego, CA 92101. Individual comments are welcomed and limited to 5 minutes per person. For more information and to confirm attendance, notification of intent to attend the meeting must be made with Marisa Knispel. Mrs. Knispel may be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please write to Marisa Knispel, TAP Office, 10 Metro Tech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or you may post your comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues. 

Dated: May 9, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E7-9343 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than May 30, 2007.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1. Atwood Holdings Limited Partnership*, Trezevant, Tennessee, and George L. Atwood, Trezevant, Tennessee, as general partner; to gain control of F & M Bancshares, Inc., Trezevant, Tennessee, and thereby indirectly gain control of Citizens City and County Bank, Trenton, Tennessee, and Farmer's and Merchants Bank, Trezevant, Tennessee.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 10, 2007.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E7-9264 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S