alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1


                          YORKSHIRE POWER GROUP LIMITED
                                  Wetherby Road
                                    Scarcroft
                                      Leeds
                                    LS14 3HS

                                                                 7 December 2000

Mr Armando A Pena
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus  Ohio 43215

Mr Richard C Kelly
800 Nicollet Mall
30th Floor
Minneapolis
Minnesota 55402


Dear Sirs

Yorkshire Power Group Limited (the "Company") proposes to file its Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended 31 December 2000, its Quarterly Reports
on Form 10-Q for the Quarters ended 31 March 2001, 30 June 2001 and 30 September
2001, and, if necessary, any Current Reports on Form 8-K (collectively, the
"Exchange Act Reports") with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

The Company and the undersigned directors and officers of the Company,
individually as a director and/or as an officer of the Company, hereby make,
constitute and appoint each of you our true and lawful attorney for each of us
and in each of our names, places and steads to sign and cause to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission the Exchange Act Reports and any
appropriate amendments thereto, to be accompanied by any necessary exhibits.

The Company hereby authorises you or any one of you to execute the Exchange Act
Reports and amendments thereto on its behalf as attorney-in-fact for it and its
authorised officers, and to file the same as aforesaid.

The undersigned directors and officers of the Company hereby authorise you or
any one of you to sign the Exchange Act Reports on their behalf as
attorney-in-fact and to amend, or remedy any deficiencies with respect to, the
Exchange Act Reports by appropriate amendment or amendments and to file the same
as aforesaid.

Very truly yours.

YORKSHIRE POWER GROUP LIMITED


By
   -------------------------------------

    Wayne H Brunetti
    Chairman and Director

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Registered Office: Wetherby Road, Scarcroft, Leeds, LS14 3HS
                   Registered in England and Wales No 3227432

<PAGE>   2

   -------------------------------------

    Dr E Linn Draper Jr
    Director



   -------------------------------------

    Armando A Pena
    Director and Chief Financial Officer



   -------------------------------------

    Donald M Clements Jr
    Director



   -------------------------------------

    Richard C Kelly
    Director



   -------------------------------------

    Paul J Bonavia
    Director



BD50


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Registered Office: Wetherby Road, Scarcroft, Leeds, LS14 3HS
                   Registered in England and Wales No 3227432
| (logo) WELLS 

           FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2016, by and among WELLSFARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, LNR PARTNERS, LLC, as SpecialServicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator,and WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and PENTALPHASURVEILLANCE LLC, as Operating Advisor and as Asset Representations Reviewerwith respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2016-C34(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwisedefined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision,and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                    |  |                                                             
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|NAME                                |  | STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
|1.    ClassroomDirect.com, LLC      |  | Delaware                                                    
|                                    | 
|2.    Childcraft Education Corp.    |  | New York                                                    
|                                    | 
|3.    Bird-in-Hand Woodworks, Inc.  |  | New Jersey                                                  
|                                    | 
|4.    Frey Scientific, Inc.         |  | Delaware                                                    
|                                    | 
|5.    Sportime, LLC                 |  | Delaware                                                    
|                                    | 
|6.    Sax Arts & Crafts, Inc.       |  | Delaware                                                    
|                                    | 
|7.    Premier Agendas, Inc.         |  | Washington                                                  
|                                    | 
|8.    Premier School Agendas, Ltd.  |  | Canada                                                      
|                                    | 
|9.    Amalgamated Widgets, Inc.     |  | Wisconsin                                                   
|                                    | 
|10.    Select Agendas, Corp.        |  | Canada                                                      
|                                    | 
|11.    Califone International, Inc. |  | Delaware                                                    
|                                    | 
|12.    Delta Education, LLC         |  | Delaware
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8835]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Vessel Chartering Permits.
    Form Number(s): None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0495.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 8.
    Number of Respondents: 10.
    Average Hours per Response: Applications, 40 minutes; notification 
of chartering arrangement termination, 5 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: This information collection consists of a 
permitting requirement for any chartering arrangement involving a U.S. 
vessel, excluding bareboat charters, made with a country other than the 
United States. This requirement was recommended at a 2002 International 
Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas meeting as a means of 
potentially reducing double reporting and incidences of illegal, 
unreported, and unregulated fishing.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions; business or other 
for-profit organizations; State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#07634f7e69626c4763686429606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bffd3e2f5fef0dbfff4f8b5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2064415649447f724f53544b4552604f4d420e454f500e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e5a7f68777a414c716d6a757b6c5e71737c307b716e30797168">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 3, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
 [FR Doc. E7-8835 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1164 

KA 14-00821 

PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSHUA A. GANG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOSEPH V. CARDONE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ALBION (KATHERINE BOGAN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (James P.

Punch, J.), rendered July 8, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant,

upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law 

§ 140.25 [2]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the 18-month

preindictment delay did not deprive him of due process (see generally

People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241, 253-254). It is well established that

“a determination made in good faith to defer commencement of the

prosecution for further investigation[,] or for other sufficient

reasons, will not deprive the defendant of due process of law even

though the delay may cause some prejudice to the defense” (Singer, 44

NY2d at 254). Here, the “investigative delays were satisfactorily

explained and were permissible exercises of prosecutorial discretion”

(People v Nazario, 85 AD3d 577, 577, lv denied 17 NY3d 904). Upon our

review of the factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442,

445), we conclude that the delay did not deprive defendant of his

right to due process (see People v Johnson, 134 AD3d 1388, 1389-1390,

affd ___ NY3d ___ [Nov. 17, 2016]). 

With respect to defendant’s remaining contentions, even assuming,

arguendo, that defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal was knowing,

intelligent and voluntary, we agree with defendant that the waiver

does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence

because “ ‘no mention was made on the record during the course of the

allocution concerning the waiver of defendant’s right to appeal his

conviction’ that he was also waiving his right to appeal any issue

concerning the severity of the sentence” (People v Lorenz, 119 AD3d
-2- 1164 

KA 14-00821 

1450, 1450, lv denied 24 NY3d 962; see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925,

928). Nevertheless, we reject defendant’s contention that his

sentence is unduly harsh and severe.

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ HO KEUNG TSE, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS A MERICA LLC, HTC AMERICA, INC., AND BLOCKBUSTER, INC., Defendants

- Appellees.

______________________

2014

- 1222

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:13

- cv

- 00194

- SI, Judge Susan Y. Illston.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
HO KEUNG TSE, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BLOCKBUSTER, INC., Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 1223 Case: 14-1222 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2014TSE v. GOOGLE INC

. 2

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:13

- cv

- 01204

- SI, Judge Susan Y. Illston.

______________________ O R D E R

T he above

- captioned appeals are related.
Accordingly,

I T I S O RDE RED T HAT :

2014

- 1222 and 2014

- 1223 shall be considered compa nion cases and assigned to the same merits panel.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s30 Case: 14-1222 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 03/13/2014
### Ground-water conditions in the vicinity of the Lake Mead base, Las Vegas Valley, Nevada

By: Omar J. Loeltz

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1669Q

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of The McClatchy Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick J. Talamantes, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                              |  |                                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 4, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    PATRICK J.
TALAMANTES
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                              |  | Patrick J. Talamantes Chief Financial Officer
#### William Richard WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. W. H. HIATT, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia.

No. 12751.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 1949.

William Richard Williams, in pro. per.

J. Ellis Mundy, U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the judg-' ment in this case in the light of the record leaves us in no doubt that the appeal is without merit. The judgment is affirmed.
#### Butler Brothers, c/o Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States

No. 7471.

Invoice dated Yokohama, Japan, November 29, 1939.

Certified November 30, 1939.

Entered at San Francisco, Calif., December 27, 1939.

Entry No. 5165.

(Decided December 11, 1947)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (J. Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:

> (1) that the merchandise in suit consists of electric light bulbs from Japan, invoiced and entered as follows:

> *Entered value 100 pcs. Yen Invoice value 100 pcs. Yen Case Description of merchandise*

> 1. 65 1. 65 #70873 5,000 Electric Tungsten Bulbs w/miniature base 2.5 Y. Flashlight Lamps #77-5802.

> 1. 35 1. 65 #70874 3,000 Electric Tungsten Bulbs w/miniature base 2.5 Y. Flashlight lamps #77-5802.

> 2. 20 2. 20 #70875 2,500 Electric Tungsten Bulbs w/miniature base 3.8 V. Flashlight lamps #77-5803.

> 1. 80 2. 20 #70876 1,000 Electric Tungsten Bulbs w/miniature base 3.8 V. Flashlight lamps #77-5803.

> (2) that the entered values for the said merchandise as above stated represent the prices at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers, at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise, in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States.

> (3) that there was no .other or higher export value for such merchandise.

> (4) that in this case, there was no finding of dumping under the. terms of the Anti-dumping Act of 1921.

> (5) that the above named appeal may be and hereby is submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the entered values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |   |                                                                              |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 14, 2007 |   |   | /s/              Harvey B.              Grossblatt                                |
|                         |   |   | Harvey B. GrossblattChief Executive Officer                                       |
|                    |   |   |                                                                              |
|                         |   |   | /s/ James B. Huff                                                                 |
|                    |   |   | James                B. HuffChief                Financial                Officer |

----
A99A0353.

#### GRICE v. THE STATE.

(511 SE2d 909)

Eldridge, Judge.

On May 15, 1998, defendant-appellant Gerald Grice1 filed a motion challenging the validity of a guilty plea entered on a 1990 shoplifting charge, Case No. 90C-71111. The State Court of DeKalb *380County denied such motion on September 3,1998, and Grice appeals.

Decided February 9, 1999.

Gerald Grice, *pro se.*

*Ralph T. Bowden, Jr., Solicitor,*for appellee.

“OCGA § 17-7-93 (b) permits a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea as a matter of right before sentence is pronounced. Even after sentencing, the trial court has the discretion to allow the withdrawal of the plea prior to the expiration of the term of court in which the sentence was entered. However, after the expiration of that term and of the time for filing an appeal from the conviction, the only remedy available to the defendant would be through habeas corpus proceedings” in the county in which the defendant is incarcerated.2 (Citation omitted.) *Staley v. State,*184 Ga. App. 402 (361 SE2d 702) (1987). See also *Cook v. State,*230 Ga. App. 507 (496 SE2d 785) (1998); *Agerton v. State,*191 Ga. App. 633 (382 SE2d 417) (1989); *State v. Kight,*175 Ga. App. 65, 66 (1) (332 SE2d 363) (1985).

In its order, the trial court correctly found that it lacked jurisdiction to address the merits of Grice’s motion. Accordingly, the trial court’s order is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*

1

 Grice was also known as Gerald Price, Derick Arnold, and Gregory Thornton.

2

 At the time of his motion, Grice was incarcerated in the United States Penitentiary in Leavenworth, Kansas.
No. 46389.

#### Protests 61839-K, etc., of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the whistling balloons, rubber balloons, and noisemakers are composed in part of bamboo. They were therefore held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 409 as claimed, following Abstract 40493. Metal kazoos stipulated to be similar to those the subject of Abstract 44122 and 32264 were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as claimed.