alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Adjustments to the Introduction of Office Automation : A Study of Some Implications of the Installation of Electronic Data Processing in 20 Offices in Private Industry, with Special Reference to Older Workers

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Adjustments to the Introduction of Office Automation : A Study of Some Implications of the Installation of Electronic Data Processing in 20 Offices in Private Industry, with Special Reference to Older Workers : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1276*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										May 1960,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4552,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
99-0653 (La. 4/23/99)

#### LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRICT OF The PARISH OF AVOYELLES v. AVOYELLES PARISH POLICE JURY, V.W. Cole, Raymond Luneau, Tommy Maddie and Steve Lacombe.

No. 99-C-0653.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Knoll, Eddie Avoyelles Par/ DA; — Other(s); Applying for Writ of Cer-tiorari and/or Review; Parish of Avoyelles 12th Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 97-4442; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CA98-0996

Denied.

KNOLL, J. not on panel; recused.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

I n the Matter of

A RTHUR P. FISCH :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2 8 8 2 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 6 9 DB 202 2

(Supreme Court of New York

, Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department,

No. 201 5

- 0 5262 )

Attorney Registration No. 22170

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28 th d ay of Ju ly , 202 2

, having failed to respond to a Notice and

Order directing him to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal discipline,

Arthur P. Fisch is disbarred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania. He shall comply with all provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Alpine Satellite DevelopmentPlan for the proposed Greater Mooses Tooth 2 Development Project, draftsupplemental environmental impact statement**
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.59:G 79/DRAFT

Item Number:0629-E-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001088401
 
Full Report | Individual Files (zip)
 
June 10, 2020
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EL PASO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,

LTD., d/b/a LAS PALMAS MEDICAL

CENTER,

Appellant,

v.

LAURA MURPHY,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00285

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2004

- 2844 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the re was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, on the judgment and all

costs, both in this Court and the court b elow, for which let execution issue. We therefore dismiss

the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justi ce

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Parks, Judge

Parks, Judge (Sitting by assignment)(Not Participating)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-25-1998
<CASH>                                             234
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,859)
<INVENTORY>                                     32,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,195
<PP&E>                                          58,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,414)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,570
<BONDS>                                         26,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,678
<SALES>                                        353,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               353,351
<CGS>                                          260,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,951
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,743
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        

</TABLE>
No. 96-7948.

#### Galvan *v.*Hurley, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 23.2

LOGO

August 5, 2010

Mr. Donald J. Vrana

Chief Financial Officer

The PBSJ Corporation

4030 W. Boy Scout Blvd

Suite 700

Tampa, Florida 33607-1784

Consent of Independent Appraisal Firm

We hereby consent to the reference to Matheson Financial Advisors, Inc. and to the incorporation of information contained in our
Valuation Report dated September 30, 2009 in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The PBSJ Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, to which this consent is an exhibit.

Respectfully,

MATHESON
FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC.

LOGO

Colvin T. Matheson, CFA

Managing Director



1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 305, McLean, VA 22101

ph. 703.760.9120fx. 703.760.9121
    www.mathesonadvisors.com
### SERVED: SEPTEMBER30, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF AIRLINE TRANSPORT PROFESSIONALS

FAADOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2011-0288
ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJUDGE In view ofthe impending prospective lapse in FY2014 appropriations funding government operations as ofSeptember 30,2013, the Depmimenthas directed that all employees inthe Office ofHearings be fnrloughed inthe event ofsuch a lapse. Accordingly, in the event of such a lapse, the Oflice ofHearings will close on Tuesday, October 1, 2013, for the duration of the shutdown. Any deadline, whether setby regulation or previous order, is suspended m1d extended for the dnration ofthe shutdown. SO ORDERED.

Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative La Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICELIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1
Jeffrey R. Ludwig, Respondent's Counsel Ludwig & Associates, P.A. 5150 Belfort RoadS., Building 500 Jacksonville. FL 32256 TEL: 904-281-0145 FAX: 904-493-0384 Gerald A. Ellis, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southem Region Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30230 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder,

Chief Administrative Law Judge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20 (Ell-310) 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FAX: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY FDMS No. FAA-2011-0288 (Civil PenaltyAction)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the follovving address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W
.. Wilbur Wright Building---Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
No. 74-5837.

#### Steen *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

# DLA Profiles in Resiliency, Larry Larkin

DLA Public Affairs

                PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii  –              
Employee resiliency is something we can all support. This Profile in Resiliency video highlights Larry Larkin, DLA Land and Maritime Pearl Harbor, sharing his story and what he did to stay strong and resilient.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MResiliency L&MLarry LarkinDetachments L&MVideo L&M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6122

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ABU ASHONTE ALI, a/k/a Marty Boldin, a/k/a Marty Boldwin, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-31, CA-98-982-2) Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 18, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abu Ashonte Ali, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Abu Ashonte Ali seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking to vacate the order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ali’s motion was a second or successive § 2255 motion and he did not seek authorization from this court. See 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2244, 2255. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAutonomous Path-Following for a Tilt-Wing, Distributed Electric Propulsion, Vertical Take-Off and Landing Unmanned Aerial System in Hover ModeThis paper presents an autonomous path-following control architecture for a tilt-wing, distributed electric propulsion, vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial system in hover mode and presents indoor flight test results. The test-bed vehicle is a subscale model with the same configuration as the NASA GL-10 aircraft. The control architecture consists of an inner-loop attitude controller, outer-loop trajec­tory controller, and a trajectory generation scheme. The flight test results show that the vehicle can satisfactorily follow a path prescribed by a list of waypoints around the indoor flight room.Document ID20180007915Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCooper, John R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Ackerman, Kasey A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Rothhaar, Paul M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredNovember 29, 2018Publication DateNovember 1, 2018Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberL-20947NF1676L-30651NASA/TM-2018-220109Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 664817.02.07.03.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180007915.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Rick Steen, the Registrants Acting Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Certified Services, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report
(the Evaluation Date); and c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors
and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 11, 2004



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Rick SteenActing Chief Financial Officer
### Ground-water resources of the Wood River unit of the lower Platte River basin, Nebraska

By: Charles Franklin Keech

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir139

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 29, 2016

p0321

Order 

Clerk

March 29, 2016

151449

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 151449

COA: 325648

Wayne CC: 11-005601-FC

TYRONE WALTER BOSWELL, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Case No. 6,966.

#### HYDE v. BANCROFT.

[The case reported under above title in 8 N. B. R. 24, is the same as Case No. 14,513.]
Before the Second Division,

May 4, 1950

No. 54308.

#### Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 156289-K (New York).

*452Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects (except title) to the books the subject of *Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 C. C. P. A. 11, C. A. D. 309), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          52,389
<SECURITIES>                                 1,181,193
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,148,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,187,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,569,270
<PP&E>                                       3,230,994
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,098,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,701,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,628,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       816,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,257,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,701,793
<SALES>                                      5,375,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,393,625
<CGS>                                        4,214,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,756,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                636,818
<INCOME-TAX>                                   248,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            388,459
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   388,459
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>