26568 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules 

Under this proposed rule, poultry and 

poultry products processed in certified 

Chilean establishments may be exported 

to the United States. All such products 

will be subject to re-inspection at 

United States ports-of-entry by FSIS 

inspectors. 

E-Government Act Compliance 

The Food Safety and Inspection 

Service is committed to complying with 

the E-Government Act, to promote the 

use of the Internet and other 

information technologies to provide 

increased opportunities for citizen 

access to Government information and 

services, and for other purposes. 

Additional Public Notification 

Public awareness of all segments of 

rulemaking and policy development is 

important. Consequently, in an effort to 

ensure that minorities, women, and 

persons with disabilities are aware of 

this document, FSIS will announce it 

on-line through the FSIS Web page 

located at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/ 

regulations_&_policies/2007_Proposed_

Rules_Index/index.asp. FSIS will also 

make copies of this Federal Register 

publication available through the FSIS 

Constituent Update, which is used to 

provide information regarding FSIS 

policies, procedures, regulations, 

Federal Register notices, FSIS public 

meetings, recalls, and other types of 

information that could affect or would 

be of interest to constituents and 

stakeholders. The update is 

communicated via Listserv, a free 

electronic mail subscription service for 

industry, trade and farm groups, 

consumer interest groups, allied health 

professionals, and other individuals 

who have asked to be included. The 

update is available on the FSIS Web 

page. Through the Listserv and Web 

page, FSIS is able to provide 

information to a much broader and more 

diverse audience. In addition, FSIS 

offers an e-mail subscription service 

which provides automatic and 

customized access to selected food 

safety news and information. This 

service is available at http:// 

www.fsis.usda.gov/news_and_events/ 

email_subscription/. Options range from 

recalls to export information to 

regulations, directives and notices. 

Customers can add or delete 

subscriptions themselves and have the 

option to password-protect their 

account. 

Done at Washington, DC, on April 30, 

2007. 

David P. Goldman, 

Acting Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 07–2202 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

10 CFR Part 72 

RIN 3150—AI13 

List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage 

Casks: NAC-MPC Revision 5 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is proposing to 

amend its regulations revising the NAC 

International, Inc., NAC-Multi-Purpose 

Canister (MPC) system listing within the 

‘‘List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage 

Casks’’ to include Amendment No. 5 to 

Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number 

1025. Amendment No. 5 would modify 

the CoC by revising the Technical 

Specifications (TS) to incorporate 

changes to the reporting and monitoring 

requirements to allow for visual 

inspection of the air inlet and outlet 

vents instead of thermal monitoring, 

revising the TS to incorporate guidance 

from NRC Interim Staff Guidance-22 

and replace all references to backfilling 

the cask with air to backfilling with 

inert gas, revising the CoC description to 

remove the requirement for tamperindicating devices on the Vertical 

Concrete Casks, and including several 

editorial changes to improve the clarity 

of the documents associated with the 

NAC-MPC system, under the general 

provisions that govern licensing 

requirements for the independent 

storage of spent nuclear fuel, high level 

radioactive waste, and reactor-related 

greater than Class C waste. 

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule 

must be received on or before June 11, 

2007. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any one of the following methods. 

Please include the following number 

(RIN 3150–AI13) in the subject line of 

your comments. Comments on 

rulemakings submitted in writing or in 

electronic form will be made available 

for public inspection. Because your 

comment will not be edited to remove 

any identifying or contact information, 

the NRC cautions you against including 

personal information such as social 

security numbers and birth dates in 

your submission. 

Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001, ATTN: 

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. 

E-mail comments to: SECY@nrc.gov. If 

you do not receive a reply e-mail 

confirming that we have received your 

comments, contact us directly at (301) 

415–1966. You may also submit 

comments via the NRC’s rulemaking 

Web site at http://rulemaking.llnl.gov. 

Address questions about our rulemaking 

Web site to Carol Gallagher (301) 415–

5905; e-mail cag@nrc.gov. Comments 

can also be submitted via the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Hand deliver comments to: 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 

20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 

Federal workdays [telephone (301) 415–

1966]. 

Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission at (301) 

415–1101. 

Publicly available documents related 

to this rulemaking may be viewed 

electronically on the public computers 

at the NRC’s Public Document Room 

(PDR), O–1F21, One White Flint North, 

11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland. Selected documents, 

including comments, can be viewed and 

downloaded electronically via the NRC 

rulemaking Web site at http:// 

ruleforum.llnl.gov. 

Publicly available documents created 

or received at the NRC after November 

1, 1999, are available electronically at 

the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/ 

index.html. From this site, the public 

can gain entry into the NRC’s 

Agencywide Document Access and 

Management System (ADAMS), which 

provides text and image files of NRC’s 

public documents. If you do not have 

access to ADAMS or if there are 

problems in accessing the documents 

located in ADAMS, contact the NRC 

PDR Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 

301–415–4737, or by e-mail to 

pdr@nrc.gov. An electronic copy of the 

proposed CoC No. 1025, the proposed 

TS, and the preliminary safety 

evaluation report (SER) for Amendment 

5 can be found under ADAMS 

Accession Nos. ML063520431, 

ML063520434, and ML063520440. 

The proposed CoC No. 1025, the 

proposed TS, the preliminary SER for 

Amendment No. 5, and the 

environmental assessment are available 

for inspection at the NRC PDR, 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville MD. Single 

copies of these documents may be 

obtained from Jayne M. McCausland, 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules 26569 

Office of Federal and State Materials 

and Environmental Management 

Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555–

0001, telephone (301) 415–6219, e-mail 

jmm2@nrc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jayne M. McCausland, Office of Federal 

and State Materials and Environmental 

Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 415–

6219, e-mail jmm2@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

additional information see the direct 

final rule published in the Rules and 

Regulations section of this Federal 

Register. 

Procedural Background 

This rule is limited to the changes 

contained in Amendment 5 to CoC No. 

1025 and does not include other aspects 

of the NAC–MPC design. Because NRC 

considers this action noncontroversial 

and routine, the NRC is publishing this 

proposed rule concurrently as a direct 

final rule. Adequate protection of public 

health and safety continues to be 

ensured. The direct final rule will 

become effective on July 24, 2007. 

However, if the NRC receives significant 

adverse comments by June 11, 2007, 

then the NRC will publish a document 

that withdraws the direct final rule and 

will subsequently address the comments 

received in a final rule. The NRC will 

not initiate a second comment period on 

this action. 

A significant adverse comment is a 

comment where the commenter 

explains why the rule would be 

inappropriate, including challenges to 

the rule’s underlying premise or 

approach, or would be ineffective or 

unacceptable without a change. A 

comment is adverse and significant if: 

(1) The comment opposes the rule and 

provides a reason sufficient to require a 

substantive response in a notice-andcomment process. For example, a 

substantive response is required when—

(a) The comment causes the NRC staff 

to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position 

or conduct additional analysis; 

(b) The comment raises an issue 

serious enough to warrant a substantive 

response to clarify or complete the 

record; or 

(c) The comment raises a relevant 

issue that was not previously addressed 

or considered by the NRC staff. 

(2) The comment proposes a change 

or an addition to the rule, and it is 

apparent that the rule would be 

ineffective or unacceptable without 

incorporation of the change or addition. 

(3) The comment causes the NRC staff 

to make a change (other than editorial) 

to the rule, CoC, or TS. 

List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 72 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Criminal penalties, 

Manpower training programs, Nuclear 

materials, Occupational safety and 

health, Penalties, Radiation protection, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, Spent 

fuel, Whistleblowing. 

For the reasons set out in the 

preamble and under the authority of the 

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; 

the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, 

as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 553; the NRC 

is proposing to adopt the following 

amendments to 10 CFR part 72. 

PART 72—LICENSING 

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE 

INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF SPENT 

NUCLEAR FUEL, HIGH-LEVEL 

RADIOACTIVE WASTE, AND 

REACTOR-RELATED GREATER THAN 

CLASS C WASTE 

1. The authority citation for part 72 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 51, 53, 57, 62, 63, 65, 69, 

81, 161, 182, 183, 184, 186, 187, 189, 68 Stat. 

929, 930, 932, 933, 934, 935, 948, 953, 954, 

955, as amended; sec. 234, 83 Stat. 444, as 

amended (42 U.S.C. 2071, 2073, 2077, 2092, 

2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201, 2232, 2233, 

2234, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2282); sec. 274, Pub. 

L. 86–373, 73 Stat. 688, as amended (42 

U.S.C. 2021); sec. 201, as amended, 202, 206, 

88 Stat. 1242; as amended, 1244, 1246 (42 

U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846); Pub. L. 95–601, sec. 

10, 92 Stat. 2951, as amended by Pub. L. 102–

486, sec. 7902, 106 Stat. 3123 (42 U.S.C. 

5851); sec. 102, Pub. L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 853 

(42 U.S.C. 4332); secs. 131, 132, 133, 135, 

137, 141, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2229, 2230, 

2232, 2241; sec. 148, Pub. L. 100–203, 101 

Stat. 1330–235 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 

10153, 10155, 10157, 10161, 10168); sec. 

1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note); 

sec. 651(e), Pub. L. 109–58, 119 Stat. 806–10 

(42 U.S.C. 2014, 2021, 2021b, 2111). 

Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs. 

142(b) and 148(c), (d), Pub. L. 100–203, 101 

Stat. 1330–232, 1330–236 (42 U.S.C. 

10162(b), 10168(c),(d)). Section 72.46 also 

issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 

2239); sec. 134, Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 2230 

(42 U.S.C. 10154). Section 72.96(d) also 

issued under sec. 145(g), Pub. L. 100–203, 

101 Stat. 1330–235 (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)). 

Subpart J also issued under secs. 2(2), 2(15), 

2(19), 117(a), 141(h), Pub. L. 97–425, 96 Stat. 

2202, 2203, 2204, 2222, 2244 (42 U.S.C. 

10101, 10137(a), 10161(h)). Subparts K and L 

are also issued under sec. 133, 98 Stat. 2230 

(42 U.S.C. 10153) and sec. 218(a), 96 Stat. 

2252 (42 U.S.C. 10198). 

2. In § 72.214, Certificate of 

Compliance 1025 is revised to read as 

follows: 

§ 72.214 List of approved spent fuel 

storage casks. 

* * * * * 

Certificate Number: 1025. 

Initial Certificate Effective Date: April 

10, 2000. 

Amendment Number 1 Effective Date: 

November 13, 2001. 

Amendment Number 2 Effective Date: 

May 29, 2002. 

Amendment Number 3 Effective Date: 

October 1, 2003. 

Amendment Number 4 Effective Date: 

October 27, 2004. 

Amendment Number 5 Effective Date: 

July 24, 2007. 

SAR Submitted by: NAC 

International, Inc. 

SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis 

Report for the NAC Multi-Purpose 

Canister System (NAC–MPC System). 

Docket Number: 72–1025. 

Certificate Expiration Date: April 10, 

2020. 

Model Number: NAC–MPC. 

* * * * * 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day 

of April, 2007. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Martin J. Virgilio, 

Acting Executive Director for Operations. 

[FR Doc. E7–9007 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

11 CFR Part 106 

[Notice 2007–10] 

Hybrid Communications 

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Election 

Commission requests comments on a 

proposed rule to attribute the 

disbursements for a public 

communication made by a political 

party that refers to a clearly identified 

Federal candidate and that also 

generically refers to other candidates of 

a political party without clearly 

identifying them. Several alternatives 

are presented, including an alternative 

to include public communications that 

refer to multiple Federal candidates. 

The Commission has made no final 

decision on the issues presented in this 

rulemaking. Further information is 

provided in the supplementary 

information that follows. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 11, 2007. The 

Commission will hold a hearing on the 

proposed rules on July 11, 2007 at 10 

a.m. Anyone wishing to testify at the 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS