alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Poster Abstract Submittal for the 35th Annual Martz Summer Conference: June 5 – 6 Boulder,

Colorado

Title: The Hydraulic Fracturing (HF) Process: Real Concern or Misdirected Focus

Concerning Threats to Drinking Water Supplies (DWS)

Massive development of several shale gas reservoirs including the Marcellus shale has 

established significant new unconventional resource reserves through multi-stage hydraulic 

fracturing coupled with horizontal drilling.

This poster illustrates that the real concern for impacts to potable aquifers (DWS) of a more 

widespread and long term nature will likely be from subsurface stray gas (methane) migration. 

Subsurface stray gas is largely sourced from either 1) non-targeted gas bearing zones (show 

intervals) that were missed and left un-isolated by the cementing of open annular intervals or 

from some failure of a barrier (casing or cement) in the well construction that leads to annular 

overpressuring. Managing risk through detecting the occurrence of and preventing methane

releases to groundwater and/or the atmosphere from stray gas migration should be the focus

rather than subsurface migration of hydraulic fracturing fluids. Only limited pathways (primarily

inter-wellbore communication in frack hits) and little (if any) documentation exists for frack 

fluid subsurface migration to potable groundwater supplies after 1.2 million fracks (frac jobs). 

Methane is buoyant and far more abundant, concentrated and mobile in response to pressure 

gradients than the frack fluids introduced into the subsurface during the hydraulic fracturing 

“process”. While non-toxic, it does pose an explosion hazard when elevated in water supplies

from either natural sources or resource development activities. It is also a potent greenhouse gas 

when vented to the atmosphere in efforts to manage stray gas. Nearly all states and the BLM,

permit well designs with substantial intermediate depth intervals of open, uncemented annuli

outside casing strings (New York in recently proposed regulation of High Volume Hydraulic 

Fracturing and recent regulatory changes by West Virginia and Arkansas are exceptions). This 

leaves potentially open a several thousand foot cross-strata migration path to the surface casing 

seat for stray methane. Under deeply fractured bedrock conditions that may extend below

required surface (or intermediate) casing depths, a migration pathway to potable freshwater 

aquifers from a borehole over pressured (above hydrostatic) by gas could circumvent cemented 

surface casings of good integrity via this natural fracture system. This poster visually presents 

this migration mechanism and illustrates this risk for discussion purposes, so that its impact and 

frequency of occurrence under various geological conditions might be considered in the context 

of the expanding unconventional resource plays.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                        WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.
                          EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PAY PLAN
                                AMENDMENT NO. 3


          WHEREAS, Wallace Computer Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), has heretofore adopted and maintains a severance pay plan for the
benefit of certain of its executive employees designated the "Wallace Computer
Services, Inc. Executive Severance Pay Plan" (the "Plan");

          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;

          WHEREAS, Subsection 6.1 of the Plan permits the Company to amend the
Plan, subject to a limitation set forth in Subsection 6.2 of the Plan which
prohibits the amendment of the Plan on or after the occurrence of a "Material
Change" (as defined in the Plan) if such amendment is adverse to the interests
of Plan participants and their beneficiaries; and

          WHEREAS, a Material Change has not occurred as of the date of the
adoption of this amendment;

          NOW, THEREFORE,  pursuant to the power of amendment  contained in
Subsection 6.1 of the Plan,  Subsection 1.2 of the Plan is amended by appending
the following sentence:

          The term "subsidiary" shall also include any limited liability company
          in which Wallace owns directly or indirectly, through an unbroken
          chain, an interest sufficient to elect a majority of the managers of
          that limited liability company.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be
executed by its duly authorized officers this 8th day of December, 1999.


                                           WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.

                                           By: _______________________________
                                               President

ATTEST:

----------------------------
Secretary
No. 96-5795.

#### Montanye *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
February 19, 2013

Mr. August J. Blake St. Bernard Parish Mosquito Control

St. Bernard Parish Government 8201 West Judge Perez Drive Chalmette, LA 70043

Dear Mr Blake:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 137.53(c)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regula tions (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your January 30, 2013, exemption request on behalf of St. Bernard Parish Government (SBPG) into the public docket (No. FAA-2005-20297), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you m ust send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### W. J. Byrnes & Co., N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6824.

Entry No. 724192, etc.

Invoices dated Bushey, England, September 12, 1941, etc.

Certified. September 17, 1941, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., November 12, 1942, etc.

(Decided January 31, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kincheloe, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

*355On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importers on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
### Floods of July 18, 1942 in north-central Pennsylvania

By: W. S. Eisenlohr Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1134B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The floods of July 1942 in north-central Pennsylvania and adjacent areas in New York were record-breaking on most of the smaller streams. They followed unprecedented rains that amounted to as much as 35 inches at some points during a storm that for the most part lasted less than 12 hours at any point. In the area of heavy rainfall, peak flood discharges were much greater than for the floods of March 1936. The storm was centered over the headwaters of three major drainage basins Susquehanna, Allegheny, and Genessee with the result that flood flows in the lower reaches of those streams were not outstanding. The estimated property damage exceeded $10,000,000 and 15 persons lost their lives. Description of previous storms and floods show that quite similar conditions have occurred in other areas in the past. The isohyetal map in the report is based on more than 400 miscellaneous observations of rainfall. Gage heights and discharges during the flood period are given for 14 gaging stations, and peak discharges are given for 47 other points on streams in the flood area. The maximum discharge was 117,000 second-feet in West Branch Susquehanna River at Renovo, and the maximum in relation to drainage area was 2,100 second-feet per square mile from 11.4 square miles in Annin Creek near Turtle Point. The report also contains a table of flood-crest elevations.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 6114.

Invoices dated Sonneberg, Germany, August 30, 1938.

Certified September 1, 1938.

Entered at Baltimore, Md., September 26, 1938.

Entry No. 1104.

(Decided March 12, 1945)

*Sharretts & Hillis (Edward P. Sharretts*of counsel.) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel I. Auster,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court, that the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoice with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, are in all material respects the same as the facts and circumstances relating to the item of 10 per centum commission specified in the invoices relating to glass tree ornaments, novelties, and figures covered by reappraisements 113038-A, 113040-A, and 113468-A of the F. W. Woolworth Co. and passed upon by the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co., B. Shackman & Co., Rice & Co. Corp., Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc., F. W. Woolworth Co.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, wherein the court held that “A purchasing commission, charged for the handling of merchandise, is not a proper part of dutiable value.”

> It is further stipulated and agreed that on the date of exportation of the merchandise involved in the case listed in the annexed schedule, identified on the invoices with “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of Examiner Charles H. Ritz, articles such and similar thereto were freely offered for sale and sold to all pur*362chasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus *3J4*per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced, and that there was no higher foreign value.

> As to all other items, the appeal is abandoned.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in *United States*v. *S. S. Kresge Co. et al.,*26 C. C. P. A. 349, 352, be incorporated herein and that the said appeal to reappraisement is submitted .on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoice by the items marked “xx” in green ink and the initials CHR of. Examiner Charles H. Ritz, and that such values are the *per se*unit invoice prices, plus *31⁄2*per centum social assessments for insurance, vacation, and holiday costs, plus packing, as invoiced.

The appeal having been abandoned insofar as it relates to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeal is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
#### La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

No. 6829.

Invoices dated Piraeus, Greece, April 23, 1940, etc.

Certified May 3, 1940, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., June 4, 1940, etc.

Entry No. 820294, etc.

(Decided January 31, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Laweence, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement involve the question of the value of certain drums filled with olive oil or other commodities imported from various countries.

From the uncontradicted evidence it appears that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that involved in *C. H. Powell Co., Inc. (Douredoure Bros.)*v. *United States,*28 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 310, C. A. D. 160, and the record in that case has been incorporated herein. The court there held that—

> * * * the presumed correctness of the value — 300 Drachmas each — found by the appraiser to be the foreign and dutiable value of the involved drums has not beer) overcome by the evidence of record.

That observation is equally applicable to the drums involved in these appeals.

Inasmuch as there is no export value higher than the above-mentioned foreign value, I follow the cited authority and find that “the foreign and dutiable value of the involved drums” in each of these appeals is the value found by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# New DLA video series touts benefits of diversity, inclusion 

By DLA Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Office

A new series of videos available on the DLA home page promotes the benefits of diversity and inclusion at the Defense Logistics Agency. 

“You Are the Manager” encourages managers to build teams with different backgrounds, ensure training is available equally to all and solicit and consider feedback and ideas from all team members.

“Our Differences Are Our Strengths” emphasizes the importance of valuing differences in building an atmosphere of creativity and innovation.

“Black and White” looks at how different backgrounds and personalities can make a team stronger by bringing an array of solutions to problems.

For more information about diversity and inclusion, visit the DLA Equal Employment Opportunity & Diversity website.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DiversityinclusionEEODLA valuesvideo
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1518 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1518

 To require a jobs score for each spending bill considered in Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2011

   Mr. Manchin (for himself, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Kirk, and Mr. Schumer) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                        Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require a jobs score for each spending bill considered in Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jobs Score Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE CBA.

    Section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 653) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'';
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) an estimate of the number of jobs which would be 
        created, sustained, or lost in carrying out such bill or 
        resolution in the fiscal year in which it is to become 
        effective and in each of the 4 fiscal years following such 
        fiscal year, together with the basis for each such estimate.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1695-DR]


New Hampshire; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of New Hampshire (FEMA-1695-DR), dated April 27, 2007, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: April 23, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective April 23, 2007.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E7-9259 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P