alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 126 Reference Change Senate (RCS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 126

To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to the Government 
of Mexico in response to the illegal border crossings from Mexico into 
 the United States, which serve to dissipate the political discontent 
            with the higher unemployment rate within Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 25 (legislative day, January 5), 2011

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

                            February 3, 2011

  Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to the Government 
of Mexico in response to the illegal border crossings from Mexico into 
 the United States, which serve to dissipate the political discontent 
            with the higher unemployment rate within Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BORDER CROSSING ACCOUNTABILITY.

    (a) Estimation of Annual Illegal Border Crossings.--Not later than 
30 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary of State, in 
consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall estimate 
the number of illegal border crossings that occurred during such fiscal 
year along the southern land border of the United States.
    (b) Reduction of Foreign Assistance.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided under paragraph (2), 
        the Secretary of State, shall proportionately reduce the amount 
        of financial assistance provided to the Government of Mexico 
        for each fiscal year by a total of $1,000 for each illegal 
        border crossing from Mexico to the United States during the 
        previous fiscal year.
            (2) Exception.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary of State may decide not to reduce the amounts 
        appropriated for the Government of Mexico from the 
        International Military Education and Training Fund, the 
        International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement Fund, and 
        the fund to carry out nonproliferation, anti-terrorism, 
        demining, and related programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of The McClatchy
Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick J. Talamantes, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: March 1, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    PATRICK J.
TALAMANTES                 
|                     |  |  |  | Patrick J. Talamantes Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John L. Skibski, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John L. Skibski
-----------------------------
John L. Skibski
Chief Financial Officer
August 3, 2005
No. 56704.

protests 152670-K, etc. (Cleveland).

#### The A. W. Fenton Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
(Reap. Dec. 8407)

Entry Nos. 150-R; 155-R.

#### Wilbur G. Hallauer *v.*United States

(Decided March 17, 1955)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendants

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> 1) The unit values as entered of the American apples and boxes of United States origin represent the foreign values thereof as defined in section 402 (c), Tariff Act of 1930, there being no higher export value, and the value of the alterations to said apples due to their condition at the time of importation thereof is nil.

> 2) These cases may be submitted' upon the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the American apples and boxes of United States origin here involved, and that such values were the entered unit values, and the value of the alterations to said apples was nil.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.18

                               DAVOX CORPORATION

            SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE & CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                  SEVERANCE AGREEMENT - EFFECTIVE MAY 4, 1999


DAVOX Corporation ("DAVOX") will provide to you the following terms and
condition of salary and benefits continuation;

(1.)   DAVOX shall provide a continuation of your base salary and medical
       benefits at DAVOX's cost, as may be in effect at the time of a qualifying
       terminations as set forth in subclause 2 commencing upon the date of
       termination, for a period of twelve (12) months or until such time as you
       assume new employment, whichever comes first.

(2.)   DAVOX shall provide continuation of salary and benefits as set forth in
       subclause (1) in the event your employment is terminated for reasons
       other than for cause.

Following the effective date of termination, as set forth in writing and
furnished to you by DAVOX, your employment with DAVOX shall cease and you shall
not hold yourself as an employee, agent or representative of DAVOX.

Continuation of salary and benefits shall further be subject to your compliance
with any then existing company policies and such other terms as may be in effect
between you and DAVOX pertaining to the disclosure of confidential or
proprietary information.

This agreement shall supercede any previous or written agreements pertaining to
severance.

DAVOX has final authority to determine all questions of eligibility to receive
benefits under this arrangement and to interpret and construe the terms of this
arrangement.

       Approvals:




       /s/ Alphonse M. Lucchese                                          6/8/99
       ---------------------------------------                           -------
       Chairman & Chief Executive Officer                                Date



       /s/ John J. Connolly                                               6/8/99
       -------------------------------------------------------            ------
       Senior Vice President Finance & Chief Financial Officer            Date
<PAGE>



                      Report of Independent Accountants on
                         Financial Statement Schedules

To the Board of Directors of
Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corporation

   Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
report dated April 30, 1999 appearing in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders
of Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corporation (which report and consolidated
financial statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K) also included an audit of the financial statement schedules listed
in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, these financial statement
schedules present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial
statements.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
April 30, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                     SCHEDULE II

                    LOEWS CINEPLEX ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION
                       VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                         (IN THOUSANDS OF U.S. DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Balance  Additions
                                            at     (Charged             Balance
                                         Beginning    to     Deductions   at
                                            of     Costs and and Other  End of
                                          Period   Expenses)  Charges   Period
                                         --------- --------- ---------- -------
<S>                                      <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>
Year Ended February 28, 1999
 Reserve for net book value of property,
  equipment and leaseholds..............  $5,999    $4,800     $3,490   $7,309
 Reserve for other costs................  $3,797    $1,050     $  803   $4,044
Year Ended February 28, 1998
 Reserve for net book value of property,
  equipment and leaseholds..............  $3,979    $4,409     $2,389   $5,999
 Reserve for other costs................  $    0    $4,656     $  859   $3,797
Year Ended February 28, 1997
 Reserve for net book value of property,
  equipment and leaseholds..............  $4,663    $4,036     $4,720   $3,979
</TABLE>

                                       1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6723

STEVE C. CHADWICK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

FRANK BISHOP, JR.; MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00101-RDB)

Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Carl Chadwick, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steve Carl Chadwick seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as 

untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) 

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chadwick has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEI ZHANG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70227 

Agency No. A089-893-702 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2022**

Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,***

District Judge.

Lei Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a decision of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an order of 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge 

for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

FILED

MAR 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of removal, and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We deny the petition. 

1. Substantial evidence supported the IJ’s adverse credibility determination, 

which the BIA affirmed. See Yali Wang v. Sessions, 861 F.3d 1003, 1007 (9th Cir. 

2017). The omission in Zhang’s declaration about an attempted “sit-in protest” 

supports the adverse credibility determination because Zhang’s efforts to petition 

were the claimed nexus for his alleged persecution based on political opinion. See

Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir. 2011) (noting that it is “not 

unreasonable for the IJ to be suspicious” when an applicant later introduces incidents 

“which would have added great weight to his claim of political persecution”). 

Likewise, Zhang’s inconsistent and contradictory testimony about his mother’s 

death certificate supports the adverse credibility finding. The IJ was not required to 

accept Zhang’s explanations for the inconsistencies, see id., nor to give substantial 

weight to the letter from Zhang’s sister-in-law, see Mukulumbutu v. Barr, 977 F.3d 

924, 927 (9th Cir. 2020). Absent his testimony, Zhang did not establish a reasonable 

likelihood of persecution if removed to China, and thus failed to show eligibility for 

asylum, see Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1048 (9th Cir. 2010), or withholding 

of removal, Ramirez-Munoz v. Lynch, 816 F.3d 1226, 1230 (9th Cir. 2016).

2. Substantial evidence supported the denial of CAT relief. In the absence of 

his testimony, Zhang did not show a likelihood of torture if removed to China. See 
3 

Yali Wang, 861 F.3d at 1009. 

PETITION DENIED.
No. 49409.

#### Protests 739313-G(B), etc., of Genuine Panama Hat Works, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consisted of 8-bu. paper Toyo hats similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent was sustained as to certain of the items.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sajan, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy Clayton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 11, 2011
/s/ Timothy ClaytonTimothy Clayton, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Penseco Financial Services Corporation (the "Company")
certifies to his knowledge that:


         (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
             December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the
             requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
             Act of 1934 (the "Act"); and


         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial conditions and results of
             operations of the Company as for the dates and for the periods
             referred to in the Form 10-K.



                                                  /s/  CRAIG W. BEST
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Craig W. Best
                                                  President and CEO
                                                  February 17, 2006













                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Penseco Financial Services Corporation (the "Company")
certifies to his knowledge that:


         (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
             December 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the
             requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
             Act of 1934 (the "Act"); and


         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial conditions and results of
             operations of the Company as for the dates and for the periods
             referred to in the Form 10-K.



                                                  /s/  PATRICK SCANLON
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Patrick Scanlon
                                                  Controller
February 17, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1059

In Re: GLEN MARCUS FALLIN,

Appellant.

_________________________

ROBERT DICARLO,

Plaintiff,

versus

BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND, a municipal

corporation; WESLEY P. MARTIN, individually

and in his official capacity as an employee of

the Department of Recreation and Parts of

Baltimore County,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-95-556-

MJG)

Argued: April 7, 1997 Decided: May 2, 1997

Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY, United

States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting

by designation.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

ARGUED: Glen Marcus Fallin, Westminster, Maryland, for Appellant.

Gregory Edward Gaskins, Assistant County Attorney, BALTIMORE COUNTY

OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Virginia

W. Barnhart, County Attorney, BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW,

Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Glen Marcus Fallin appeals from the district court's

order that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, he pay sanctions of

$540.50 arising out of his legal representation of Robert DiCarlo

in a suit brought by DiCarlo against Appellees Baltimore County,

Maryland and Wesley P. Martin. Under our well-established precedent, the order of sanctions against Fallin is not appealable

absent a final judgment in the underlying litigation. See Wheeler

v. Anchor Continental Inc., 622 F.2d 94, 95 (4th Cir. 1980); Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Suburban Trust Co., 666 F.2d 55, 58 (4th Cir.

1981). Because no final judgment has been rendered in this case,

we dismiss Fallin's appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED
3