alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-926-07-1910-BJ-5REE]


Montana: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Montana State Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM Montana State Office, 
Billings, Montana, (30) days from the date of publication in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Bonorden, Cadastral Surveyor, 
Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 Southgate 
Drive, Billings, Montana 59101-4669, telephone (701) 227-7730 or (406) 
896-5009.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the Fort Peck gency, through the Rocky Mountain Regional Director, 
Bureau of Indian Affairs, and was necessary to determine Trust and 
Tribal land.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Principal Meridian, Montana

T. 26 N., R. 43 E.

    The plat, in 2 sheets, representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the Tenth Guide Meridian East, through Township 26 North, a 
portion of the east boundary, a portion of the subdivision of sections 
6 and 13, the adjusted original meanders of the former left bank of the 
Missouri River, downstream, through sections 6 and 13, and certain 
division of accretion lines in sections 6 and 13, the subdivision of 
section 13, and the survey of a portion of the meanders of the present 
left bank of the Missouri River, downstream, through sections 6 and 13, 
and certain division of accretion lines in sections 6 and 13, Township 
26 North, Range 43 East, of the Principal Meridian, Montana, was 
accepted April 25, 2007.
    We will place copies of the plat, in 2 sheets, and related field 
notes we described in the open files. They will be available to the 
public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the 
plat, in 2 sheets, prior to the date of the official filing, we will 
stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file this plat, in 2 sheets, until the day 
after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become 
final, including decisions or appeals.

     Dated: April 26, 2007.
Michael J. Birtles,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. E7-8449 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

HO KEUNG TSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA LLC, HTC 

AMERICA, INC., AND BLOCKBUSTER, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2014-1222

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-00194-SI, 

Judge Susan Y. Illston.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

HO KEUNG TSE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BLOCKBUSTER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-1223

Case: 14-1222 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 03/13/2014
2 TSE v. GOOGLE INC. 

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-01204-SI, 

Judge Susan Y. Illston.

______________________ 

O R D E R

The above-captioned appeals are related.

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

2014-1222 and 2014-1223 shall be considered companion cases and assigned to the same merits panel. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

s30

Case: 14-1222 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 03/13/2014
#### Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States

No. 6799.

Entry No. 707114.

Invoice dated London, England,'June 12, 1946.

Certified June 13, 1946.

Entered at New York, N. Y., July 24, 1946.

(Decided January 23, 1947)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Bao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cline, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard LaBarbera, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2008                    
|                                     
|/s/ Richard LaBarbera                
|Richard LaBarbera                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 42065.

#### Protest 939050-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that the harmonicas in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 40586. The claim at 40 percent un'der paragraph 1541 was therefore sustained.
#### Alice IBIETA v. STAR CASINO, INC., and XYZ Insurance Company.

No. 98-C-2806.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1999.

In re Ibieta, Alice; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “J” No. 94-17813; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 98CA-0314.

Denied.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Vander Zanden, President and Chief
Executive Officer of School Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 (the Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of School Specialty, Inc.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 1, 2011



/s/    David J. Vander ZandenDavid J. Vander ZandenChief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
## Board Resolution:

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

### Resolution #

### 13-01 

# Before the Placer County Air Pollution Control DistrictBoard ofDirectors

In the Matter Of: Approve a resolution to adopt amendments to District Rule 213, Gasoline Transferinto Stationary Storage Containers as shown inExhibit #I.
The following RESOLUTION was duly passed by the Placer County Air Pollution Control District Board ofDirectors at a regular meeting held on February 21. 2013, by the following vote: Ayes: Holmes, M. 

## v Barkle 

### v Nader 

### v Weygandt 

### v Ucovich .......-- Holmes, J. 

# v Ruslin 

### v Montgomery 

### v Garcia 

## v Noes: Holmes,M. Barkle Nader Weygandt Ucovich Holmes, J. Ruslin Montgomery Garcia Abstain: Holmes, M. Barkle Nader Weygandt Ucovich Holmes, J. Ruslin Montgomery Garcia

WHEREAS, Section 4000I ofthe Health and Safety Code ofthe State ofCalifornia authorizes the Placer County Air Pollution Control District to adopt and enforce Rules and Regulations to achieve and maintain ambient airquality standards withinthe District; and WHEREAS, Section 40702 ofthe Health and Safety Code ofthe State ofCalifornia requires a district to adopt rules and regulations and do such acts as may be necessary orproper to execute the powers and duties granted; and WHEREAS, Section 41950 ofthe Health and Safety Code ofthe State ofCalifornia requires stationarygasolinetanks be equippedwith avaporrecovery system; and

Resolution # 13-01 17WHEREAS, amendment ofthis regulation is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Title 14, California Administrative Code, Section 15308, as an action by a regulatory agency for the protection ofthe environment; and WHEREAS, these proceedings were held in a public hearing and ·were properly noticed pursuant to Section 40725 ofthe Health and Safety Code ofthe State of California; with any evidence having been received concerning the proposed adoption of this Resolution and this Boardhaving duly considered such evidence; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board approves and adopts amended Rule 213, Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage Containers, as showninExhibit

### #I. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Air Pollution Control Officer is hereby authorized and directed to submit this adopted rule, in the form required by the California Air Resources Board, on behalfofthe Placer County Air Pollution Control District, and to perform such acts as are necessaryto carry out the purpose ofthis resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Air Pollution Control Officer is hereby authorized and directed to submit this adopted rule for approval as a revision ofthe State ImplementationPlan (SIP).

2 Resolution# 13-0118
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 23, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-875]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 1220

[Docket No. LS-06-06]


Soybean Promotion and Research: Qualified State Soybean Boards; 
Correction

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) published a final 
rule and termination order (final rule) in the Federal Register on 
November 28, 1995 (60 FR 58499) regarding technical amendments to the 
Soybean Promotion, Research and Consumer Information Order (Order). AMS 
has found that section 1220.228(a)(1)(v)(A) pertaining to producer 
refunds, was mistakenly removed from the Order as part of the final 
rule. This document corrects the Order by adding the language that 
previously appeared in section 1220.228(a)(1)(v)(A).

DATES: Effective Date: January 23, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth R. Payne, Chief, Marketing 
Programs Branch, 202/720-1115 or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#29624c47474c5d4107794850474c695c5a4d48074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="78331d16161d0c1056281901161d380d0b1c19561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document provides a correcting 
amendment to the Soybean Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information 
Order that appears at 7 CFR part 1220.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR 1220

    Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Agricultural 
research, Marketing agreements, Soybeans and soybean products, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

0
Accordingly, 7 CFR part 1220 is corrected by making the following 
amendment:

PART 1220--SOYBEAN PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER INFORMATION

0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1220 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6301-6311.


0
2. Amend Sec.  1220.228 by adding paragraph (a)(1)(v) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  1220.228  Qualified State Soybean Boards.

    (a)(1) * * *
    (v) If the entity is authorized or required to pay refunds to 
producers, any requests from producers for refunds for contributions to 
it by the producer following the termination of authority to pay 
refunds, will be honored by forwarding to the Board that portion of 
such refunds equal to the amount of credit received by the producer for 
contributions to it pursuant to Sec.  1220.223(a)(3);
* * * * *

    Dated: January 17, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E7-875 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 96-5791.

No. 96-5849.

#### Walton *v.*United States; and Watkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 86 F. 3d 1154.
ESA Consultation Request for Pio Pico Energy Center

Roger Kohn to: Eric_Porter 12/23/2011 09:47 AM

Cc: djenkins, SHill, lincoln.hulse, ACrisp, Gerardo Rios

Eric,

Here is an electronic copy of our letter requesting initiation of formal consultation under ESA Section 7 for 

the Pio Pico Energy Center, a new power plant proposed in San Diego County. In addition, I have 

attached the Biological Assessment for the project. 

Please let me know if you have questions.

Thank you.

Roger Kohn

USEPA Region 9 - Air Division (AIR-3)

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

415-972-3973 

kohn.roger@epa

 12-23-11 ESA consultation request.pdf Pio Pico Draft Biological Assessment.pdf
#### H. W. Robinson *&*Co. *v.*United States

No. 7425.

Invoices dated London, England, March 23, 1942, etc.

Certified March 26, 1942, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., May 4, 1942, etc.

Entry Nos. 749733; 752506; 754584.

(Decided October 29, 1947)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge

(Abstract): These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

An agreed set of facts shows export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar oases.
No. 50738.

#### Protest 46927-K of Aris Gloves, Inc. (New York).

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

When this case was called for trial, counsel for the Government moved that the protest be dismissed as untimely in that it was filed more than 60 days after liquidation. Decision on the motion was reserved, and application of counsel for time to file memoranda thereon was granted.

Liquidation of the entry involved took place on June 12, 1940, and the protest was filed on August 12, 1940, or 61 days after liquidation. It appears that the sixtieth day after liquidation, August 11, was a Sunday, and in the memorandum filed on behalf of plaintiff in opposition to the motion numerous statutes and cases are cited, and various arguments are advanced for the proposition that when the last day for filing falls on a Sunday the act may lawfully be done on the succeeding day.

The question, however, is not a new one in customs litigatiop and it has been consistently decided adversely to the contention made by the plaintiff, the latest expression being found in *Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.*v. *United States,*15 Cust. Ct. 95, C. D. 951, wherein this court (Keefe, J.) held that, under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930,' a protest is filed when received by the collector and, if the sixtieth day fails on Sunday, a protest received the day following is untimely and should be dismissed. Judge Keefe cited the leading case of *Psaki Bros.*v. *United States,*3 Ct. Cust. App. 479, T. D. 33122, wherein our appellate court held that when the 10-day limit fixed by the Customs Administrative Act of 1890 for filing a protest expired on Sunday, it was not a seasonable compliance when the protest was filed on the Monday morning ensuing.

In view of the foregoing and having no equitable jurisdiction, we are constrained to grant the motion to dismiss the protest herein.
Before the Second Division,

January 20, 1941

No. 45236.

#### Protests 642835-G, etc., of International Clearing House of New York, et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1


             Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Skinovation Pharmaceutical Incorporated
(the "Company") certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that:

..     the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                      /s/ John W. Peters
Date: May 10, 2006                    __________________________________
                                      John W. Peters
                                      Principal Executive Officer
                                      Principal Financial Officer
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Krav Maga Classes at DLA Land and Maritime

People and Culture

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
View in open caption

Krav Maga is the combat system used by the Israeli Defense Forces. At DLA Land & Maritime you have the opportunity to experience Krav Maga first hand. You can take a series of classes or come for one class. Self-defense is more important than ever so stop considering it and just do it, because you really can't be too prepared.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

DLA L&MCulture L&MTraining L&MSafety L&MVideo L&M
# C_2016419EN.01004502.xml

| 14.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/45

---

Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — Aston Martin Lagonda v EUIPO (Representation of a grille on the front of a car)

(Case T-87/15) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 419/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd (Gaydon, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 December 2014 (Case R 1797/2014-2) relating to the applicant’s Community trade mark application

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 27.4.2015.

1

---