alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,025
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,203
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,182)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,630
<PP&E>                                          30,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,318)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 410,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,305
<BONDS>                                        283,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           51,460
<PREFERRED>                                     53,692
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,051)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   410,068
<SALES>                                        112,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,531
<CGS>                                           81,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   694
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,899)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (86.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (86.24)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4


                    CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 1998-A
                          ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       of
                           COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that she is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 1998-A and that she is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in
connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of February
1, 1998 (the "Indenture"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition
shall have the respective meanings specified in the Indenture.

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under her supervision
and, to the best of her knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied
with all conditions and convenants in all material respects under the Indenture
throughout the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 25th
day of March, 2002.

                              CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 1998-A
                              BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                              individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee


                              /s/ Denise Geran
                              ---------------------------------------
                              Name:  Denise Geran
                              Title: Senior Financial Services Officer

         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer, hereby
requests that Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee, execute the above
Issuer's Certificate and deliver it to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National
Association, as Indenture Trustee.


                              CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                              NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer

                              /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                              ---------------------------------------
                              Richard J. Naeder
                              Authorized Signatory
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1553 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to facilitate emergency medical 

services personnel training and certification curriculums for military veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2011 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to facilitate emergency medical services personnel training and certification curriculums for military veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans to Para5 medics Transition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PER7 SONNEL TRAINING FOR VETERANS. 

8 Section 330J(c)(8) of the Public Health Service Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 254c–15(c)(8)) is amended by inserting before 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1553 IS

1 the period the following: ‘‘, including, as provided by the 

2 Secretary, may use funds to provide to military veterans 

3 required coursework and training that take into account, 

4 and are not duplicative of, previous medical coursework 

5 and training received when such veterans were active 

6 members of the Armed Forces, to enable such veterans 

7 to satisfy emergency medical services personnel certifi8 cation requirements, as determined by the appropriate 

9 State regulatory entity’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00801-CV

IN RE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 8, 2013

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On November 28, 2012, Relator Boy Scouts of America filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus. After the cause was abated to the trial court, Relator filed an amended petition for 

writ of mandamus on February 5, 2013 asking, in part, that we issue a writ of mandamus 

directing the trial court to vacate her January 30, 2013 order. The court has considered Relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus, the real party in interest’s response, and Relator’s reply and is of 

the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CI-02919, styled John Adams, an individual proceeding under a 

fictitious name v. Boy Scouts of America and Alamo Area Council Boy Scouts of America, pending in the 288th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Solomon J. Casseb, III presiding. However, the order 

complained of was signed by the Honorable Laura Salinas, presiding judge of the 166th Judicial District Court, 

Bexar County, Texas.
#### BUDGET RENT-A-CAR SYSTEMS, INC. d/b/a Budget Rent-A-Car of New Orleans, Inc. v. ALLSTATE INS. CO., Steven Eberly, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of his Minor Son, Jon Eberly, United Services Automobile Association and James McBride.

No. 98-C-0810.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 8, 1998.

In re United Services Auto. Assn.;—Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 97-CA-0984; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 454-260.

Denied.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.
#### Alfred E. CARR, Jr. and Evella Faciane Carr v. HIBERNIA NATIONAL BANK.

No. 98-CP-2246.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1999.

In Re: Jacqueline Carr — Other(s); Applying for Reconsideration of Order of this Court dated November 13, 1998, Parish of St. Tammany 22nd JDC Div. “F” No. 92-11540; Court of Appeal, First Circuit No. CA95 1342.

Reconsideration not considered. Application was untimely.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2316

In re: PERCY JAMES TUCKER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:09-cr-00182-AWA-DEM-1)

Submitted: February 4, 2021 Decided: April 19, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percy James Tucker, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Percy James Tucker petitions for a writ of mandamus, asking us to order the district 

court to file and consider motions in his closed criminal case. “[M]andamus is a drastic 

remedy that must be reserved for extraordinary situations.” In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 

907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). “Courts 

provide mandamus relief only when (1) petitioner ‘ha[s] no other adequate means to attain 

the relief [he] desires’; (2) petitioner has shown a ‘clear and indisputable’ right to the 

requested relief; and (3) the court deems the writ ‘appropriate under the circumstances.’” 

Id. (quoting Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 367, 380-81 (2004)). The writ of 

mandamus is not a substitute for appeal after final judgment. Will v. United States, 389 

U.S. 90, 97 (1967); In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

We have reviewed Tucker’s petition and amended petition, and we conclude that he 

fails to show that he is entitled to the requested relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition 

and amended petition for a writ of mandamus. We deny the motion for release as moot. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129777(25) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129777 

 COA: 263780 
 Bay CC: 97-001217-FH,

JON MICHAEL EDGAR, 00-001344-FH, 01-001473-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

26, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously. 

d0122 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 29, 2007 

 Clerk
No. 96-7821.

#### Timber et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Before the Third Division,

March 26, 1943

No. 48147.

#### Petition 6283-R of Herzig & Hart, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the record before the single judge, sitting in reappraisement, was admitted in evidence. The president of the importing firm herein testified that he had consulted with other buyers of furs in New York and had instructed his brokers to consult with the appraiser before entering the merchandise and he had no cause to believe that the entered prices were lower than the value of the merchandise, had never misrepresented or concealed any of the facts, and had no intention of defrauding the revenue. On the record presented the court was of the opinion that the petitioner in making entry acted in good faith and that a full and candid disclosure was made of all the facts in his possession concerning the value of the merchandise at the time of entry. The petition was therefore granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                       692
<INVENTORY>                                      4,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,885
<PP&E>                                           9,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,120)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,325
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           171
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,637
<SALES>                                        138,676
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,676
<CGS>                                           57,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,935
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,711
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68


</TABLE>
No. 92-1694.

#### Sumlin *v.*Seahawk Management, Inc.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 96-5822.

#### Cook *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 5:11 PM 

Subject: Notification - Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Energy Conservation Standards for 

standby mode and off mode for Microwave Ovens and the Technical Support Documents 

To Interested Parties: 

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has submitted to the Federal Register on Thursday, 

02/02/2012 a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Energy Conservation Standards 

for standby mode and off mode for Microwave Ovens and the Technical Support Documents. 

[RIN 1904–AC07, Docket No. EERE–2011–BT–STD–0048]. 

In this notice, DOE addresses the proposed energy conservation standards for standby and off 

mode power consumption. DOE invites comments, data, and information about the proposed 

energy efficiency levels, the analyses in the technical support document, and the analytical tools 

that were used to evaluate proposed efficiency standards. Additionally, DOE invites comments 

on any other issues relevant to the development of energy conservation standards for 

microwave ovens. 

For additional details about the notice of proposed rulemaking, technical support documents, 

and upcoming public meeting, please see below:

The following document was published in the Federal Register on February 2, 2012.

Product Microwave Oven Standby Power

Type Notice

Action Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rule

Date February 2, 2012

FR Ref. TBA

Title Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Standby Mode and Off

Mode for Microwave Ovens

RIN 1904–AC07

eDocketI

D

EERE–2011–BT–STD–0048

Link to

PDF

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/cooking_prod

ucts.html

Yours truly, 

Wes Anderson
No. 47639.

#### Protests 10271-K, etc., of W. J. Green Co., Inc. (Norfolk).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Green*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 173, C. D. 599) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1750 was sustained.
Case *No.*14,686.

#### UNITED STATES v. BURLEY.

[14 Blatchf. 91.] 2

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Jan. 12, 1877.

Violation op Election Laws — Naturalization Certificate — Unlawful Issue.

B. registered as a voter, on the production- of a certificate of his. naturalization, which had been issued by a state court without his presence in court, and without sny oath having been taken by him. The certificate was regular on its face. On an indictment against B., under aec-tipn 5426 of the Revised Statutes, for using, for the purpose of registering as a voter, a naturalization certificate, knowing the same to have been unlawfully issued, *held,*that the mere fact that B. knew that the certificate had been issued without his presence in court, and without any oath being taken by him, was not sufficient to warrant a conviction.

This was an indictment, under section 5426 of the Revised Statutes, for using, for the purpose of registering as a voter, a naturalization certificate, knowing the same to have been unlawfully issued. The evidence showed that the defendant [William Burley] had registered as a voter, upon the production of a certificate of his naturalization, which certificate had been issued by a state court without the presence of the applicant in court, and without any oath hav*1302ing been taken by him. The certificate was, in all respects, regular upon its face.

Benjamin B. Foster, Asst. U. S. Dist. Atty.

•John L. Hill, for defendant.

THE COURT

held, that the mere fact that the defendant knew that the certificate had been issued without his presence in court, and without any oath being taken by him, was not sufficient to warrant a conviction.
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1501 

To require the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to conduct 

the business of the Committee in a manner that is open to the public. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2011 

Mr. HELLER (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. VITTER, Mr. LEE, Ms. AYOTTE, 

Mr. PAUL, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. JOHNSON of Wisconsin) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To require the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction 

to conduct the business of the Committee in a manner 

that is open to the public. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRANSPARENCY. 

4 Section 401(b)(5) of the Budget Control Act of 2011 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (E)— 

7 (A) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘and make 

8 the agenda available to the public’’ after ‘‘meet9 ing’’; and 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1501 IS

1 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(iii) OPEN MEETINGS.— 

3 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—Except as 

4 provided in subclause (II), each meet5 ing, including a quorum of members, 

6 of the joint committee shall be— 

7 ‘‘(aa) made open to the pub8 lic; and 

9 ‘‘(bb) made available for tel10 evision coverage. 

11 ‘‘(II) EXCEPTION.—The joint 

12 committee may conduct a closed meet13 ing for the purpose of discussing clas14 sified information.’’; and 

15 (2) in subparagraph (F)(ii), by adding at the 

16 end the following: 

17 ‘‘(III) OPEN HEARINGS.— 

18 ‘‘(aa) IN GENERAL.—Except 

19 as provided in item (bb), any 

20 hearing conducted by the joint 

21 committee shall be— 

22 ‘‘(AA) made open to 

23 the public; and 

24 ‘‘(BB) made available 

25 for television coverage. 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1501 IS

1 ‘‘(bb) EXCEPTION.—The 

2 joint committee may conduct a 

3 closed hearing for the purpose of 

4 discussing classified informa5 tion.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 0445

_____________________________
F RAZIER H ANNON J
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Coleman Lee Robinson , Judge

.

August 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., and M.K. T HOMAS and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody
, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                           UNIFAB INTERNATIONAL, INC.
      "UNIFAB common stock to be delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market"

New Iberia, LA - (Market Wire) - June 21, 2004-- UNIFAB International, Inc. (the
"Company") (NASDAQSC: UFAB) reports that it received a final Nasdaq Staff
Determination on June 17, 2004, indicating that the Company has not regained
compliance with Nasdaq's market capitalization requirement, stockholders' equity
requirement or requirement for net income from operations, as set forth in
Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(2)(B). Consequently, the Company's common stock will be
delisted from the NASDAQ SmallCap Market at the opening of business on June 28,
2004. "With no expectation that we could meet any one of the required Nasdaq
standards in the foreseeable future, our Company was not able to prevent
delisting from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market," said Martin K. Bech, Vice President
and General Counsel of UNIFAB.

The Company's common stock will be available on the OTC Bulletin Board (the
"Bulletin Board"), effective with the open of business on June 28, 2004,
provided a market maker enters a quote on that day. If no quote is entered on
June 28, then the Company's common stock may trade on the Bulletin Board upon
application made by a broker-dealer.

UNIFAB International, Inc. is a custom fabricator of topside facilities,
equipment modules and other structures used in the development and production of
oil and gas reserves. In addition, the Company designs and manufactures
specialized process systems and refurbishes and retrofits existing jackets and
decks.

Statements made in this news release regarding UNIFAB's expectations as to
future operations and other statements included herein that are not statements
of historical fact are forward-looking statements that depend upon the following
factors, among others: continued demand for the services provided by UNIFAB, the
availability of skilled employees and the ability of UNIFAB to increase its
profits and stockholders equity. Should any of these factors not continue as
anticipated, actual results and plans could differ materially from those
expressed in the forward-looking statements.

                                       31