alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Blue River Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrice
M. Lima, Vice President and Controller, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     This certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and is not being filed for any other purpose.


/s/ Patrice M. Lima
-------------------------------------
Vice President and Controller
March 31, 2006


                                       100
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 22, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40375

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. 

MARTINDALE F MCLYMONT

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:02-CR-141-2

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Martindale F . McLymont

has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McLymont has filed

a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s

brief, and McLymont’s response, discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Analysis of Coverage and Wage Rates of State Minimum Wage Laws and Orders, August 1, 1965

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Analysis of Coverage and Wage Rates of State Minimum Wage Laws and Orders, August 1, 1965 : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 291*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1965,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5555,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
May 9, 1951

No. 55535.

#### J. M. Arnof Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 157896-K,

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8314

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. BERNARD GIBSON, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:94-cr-00454-PJM-7)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Gibson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Chan Park, Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bernard Gibson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his petition for a writ of audita querela as a successive motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008), and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El

v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
### Geology and occurrence of fresh and brackish ground water in Glynn County, Georgia

By: Robert L. Wait

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1613E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

No. 8054.

Entered at San Francisco, Calif.

Entry No. 1378, etc.

(Decided September 24, 1951)

*Sharretts, Hillis & Paley (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*David N. Edelstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiffs and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the earthenware articles covered by the Appeals to reappraisement enumerated on schedule “A” hereto attached and made part hereof, at which such or similar ¿Merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary- course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised value less the amount added to meet advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases and that there is no higher foreign value.

> • IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that these appeals to reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of-the value of the earthenware articles here involved, and that such value was in each instance the appraised value, less the amount added to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases.

Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
#### The HANOVER INSURANCE CO., Respondent, v. K & K CAR REPAIR, INC., Appellant.

No. 73678.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Oct. 6, 1998.

Steven M. Davis, Arnold, for appellant.

John H. Marshall, Burns & Marshall, LLP, Clayton, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, P.J., and HOFF and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, K & K Car Repair, Inc., appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County entered in favor of respondent, The Hanover Insurance Company, on its re-plevin action. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report). I, Li Xiangqian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | The Report fully complies with the requirements of   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | The information contained in the Report fairly   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of   operations of the Company.

|By: | /s/ Li Xiangqian        | 
|--- | ----------------------- | 
|    |                         | 
|    | Li Xiangqian            | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | February 16, 2006       | 

---
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE 

I, Allen D. Goodman, a Managing Member of Beeland Management Company, L.L.C., the General Partner of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) theQuarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in suchQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. 

Date:November 16, 2009 

By: /s/ Allen D. Goodman

Allen D. Goodman 

Managing Member (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 

Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. 

General Partnerof Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Opinion issued August 28, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00016-CR

———————————

SHAWN BULENT BUTLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1479420

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Shaun Bulent Butler, pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a 

deadly weapon with an agreement from the State to cap punishment at 30 years’ 

imprisonment. In accordance with the terms of this plea bargain agreement with the 
2

State, the trial court sentenced appellant to 15 years’ imprisonment. Appellant filed 

a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An agreement placing a cap on 

punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

25.2(a)(2). See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); 

Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Wilson v. State, 264 

S.W.3d 104, 108 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); Waters v. State, 

124 S.W.3d 825, 826–27 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref’d). 

Because the record shows that appellant agreed to the State’s recommendation of a 

cap of 30 years on sentencing, this is a plea bargain case under Rule 25.2(a)(2) and 

appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2)

An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has 

the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal and states that 

appellant waived the right of appeal. The record contains plea papers signed by 

appellant showing that he agreed to waive his right to appeal in exchange for the 

plea agreement capping his sentence at 30 years’ imprisonment. The record thus 
3

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2005).

Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See 

Chavez, 183 S.W.3d at 680 (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to 

ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 

25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the 

basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
D. LaBeau, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Ronald D. LaBeau
--------------------
Ronald D. LaBeau
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# DLA Profiles in Resiliency, Neil Sheaffer

DLA Public Affairs

                COLUMBUS, Ohio  –              
Employee resiliency is something we can all support. The Profiles in Resiliency video series highlights different employees sharing their story and what they did to stay strong and resilient. 

Open caption video available.

For more information about DLA's program visit: www.dla.mil/info/resiliency.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

## Related Stories

DLA: Be a Part of Something Big. 

Women's History Month Highlight

African American History Month 

DLA L&MResiliency L&MCulture L&MHealth and Wellness L&MPersonal Development L&MWellness L&MVideo L&M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mario A. MURALLES.

No. 99-KK-0099.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1999.

In re Muralles, Mario A.;- — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, No. 98-1464; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 99-KW-0048.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., and LEMMON, J., would grant the writ.

• JOHNSON, J., not on panel.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MBT Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, H. Douglas Chaffin, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ H. Douglas Chaffin
-------------------------------------
H. Douglas Chaffin
Chief Executive Officer
November 4, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                               U.S. REALTEL, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of U.S. RealTel, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neal L. Miller, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                By: /s/ Neal L. Miller
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Neal L. Miller
                                    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    Officer

March 30, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. RealTel, Inc. and will be
retained by U.S. RealTel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.