alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-60997, 333-61007, 333-90802, 333-90858 and 333-90860) of
Hastings Entertainment, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Hastings Entertainment,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31,
2003.



                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Fort Worth, Texas
April 18, 2003















                                       54
(Reap. Dec. 9457)

#### Carl Fischer Musical Insts. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 80811; 481210.

(Decided June 11, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Coehran Donb,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement relate to certain musical instruments exported from France and entered at the port of Hew York.

Stipulated facts, upon which the cases are before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question, which are represented by the invoice items marked “A” and checked “RDE,” is cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for the merchandise is equal to the invoice values, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 54863.

#### Charles A. Andres et al. *v.*United States,

protests 133611-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
99-0007 (La. 4/23/99)

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Rodney Wayne BAKER.

No. 99-K-0007.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Baker, Rodney Wayne; — Defendants); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Caddo 1st Judicial District Court Div. “G” Number 185409; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Number 31162-KA

Denied.

KNOLL, J. not on panel.
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Medina  Coffee,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Timothy P. Halter,  President and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 3, 2004

                                       By: /s/ Timothy P. Halter
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Timothy P. Halter, President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
No. 48771.

#### Protests 949346-G, etc., of Baltic Trading Co., Ltd., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 48269. The protests were therefore sustained.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40771

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff-Respondent
,

v.

RONALD EUGENE NEW
,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 698

Filed: October 3, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Kootenai County. Hon. Lansing L. Haynes , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of seven years with three years determinate for possession of methamphet amine , and five years with three years determinate for felony eluding a peace officer, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, De puty Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Ronald Eugene New was convicted of possession of methamphetamine , Idaho Code

§ 37

- 2732(c)(1), and felony eluding a peace officer, I.C. § 49

- 1404. The district court sentenced

New to concurrent u nified terms of seven years with three years determinate for possession and

five years with three years determinate for eluding. New appeals, contending that his sentences

are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez

, 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, w e consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, New ’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
# C_2020313EN.01002201.xml

| 21.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 — Ocean Capital Administration and Others v Council

(Case T-332/15) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran - Freezing of funds - List of persons and entities to whom those measures apply - Inclusion of the applicants’ names)

(2020/C 313/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ocean Capital Administration GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex (represented by: P. Moser QC, E. Metcalfe, Barrister, and M. Taher, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, based on Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/556 of 7 April 2015 amending Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2015 L 92, p. 101), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/549 of 7 April 2015 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2015 L 92, p. 12), in so far as those acts concern the applicants, and, second, an application based on Article 277 TFEU for a declaration of the inapplicability of Council Decision 2013/497/CFSP of 10 October 2013 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2013 L 272, p. 46), and of Council Regulation (EU) No 971/2013 of 10 October 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2013 L 272, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ocean Capital Administration GmbH and the other applicants, whose names are set out in the annex, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ocean Capital Administration GmbH and the other applicants, whose names are set out in the annex, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2015.

---
Exhibit 10.6

Summary of Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. and Shuibei Branch, Shenzhen Commercial Bank (Commercial Bank) dated April 21, 2006.



| |  | Contract number: Shen Shangyin (Shuibei) Shouxinzi (2006) A110020600006
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Maximum amount for credit facilities to be provided: RMB50 million;
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Term: from April 21, 2006 to April 21, 2007;
|- |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  | Interest rate of loan shall be the base rate announced by the Peoples Bank of China less 10%;
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Adjustment of credit can be made by the Commercial Bank under the any of the following:
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Company suffers severe operational risk or its financial situation severely deteriorates;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Guarantors payment ability is obviously weakened or value of pledged collaterals decreases obviously;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Occurrence of other instances which make the Commercial Bank think adjustment of credit facility is necessary;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Breach of contract penalty: adjustment of credit, cancellation of unused credit, imposition of punitive interest, demand prepayment of loan and other measures;
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Special term:
|- |  | -------------



| |  |  | Credit facilities under the Comprehensive Agreement can only be used for technical innovation, production equipments improvement and purchase of equipments and raw materials.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of the articles omitted



| |  | Types of line of credit
|- |  | -----------------------



| |  | The use of the line of credit
|- |  | -----------------------------



| |  | Repayment of the loan under the line of credit
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  | Representation and warranty of the lender
|- |  | -----------------------------------------



| |  | Miscellaneous
|- |  | -------------



| |  | Applicable law
|- |  | --------------



| |  | Validity
|- |  | --------
Exhibit 99.1



Letterhead of Halt, Buzas & Powell, Ltd.


                   Internal Control over Financial Reporting


     American  Utilicraft's  management has established  internal  controls over
financial  reporting.  As of the  date of  this  letter,  American  Utilicraft's
management is in the process of  evaluating  the  effectiveness  of the internal
controls over financial reporting.  Therefore, we can ot issue an opinion on the
internal controls of American Utilicraft Corporation for the year ended December
31, 2003. In addition, American Utilicraft's management is working diligently to
be in  compliance  with  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002  for the  year  ended
Decembber 31, 2004.


/s/ Halt, Buzas & Powell, Ltd.

Halt, Buzas & Powell, Ltd.
Alexandria, VA
November 11, 2004
No. 46995.

#### Protests 7849-K, etc., of C. S. Allen Corp.

Government’s motion for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of China BAK Battery, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report). I, Han Yongbin,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Han Yongbin
-----------------------
Han Yongbin
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2005
No. 46970.

#### Protests 817053-G, etc., of American Machine & Foundry Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 8431)

Entry No. 16702.

#### Penson & Company Gulf & West Indies, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided May 10, 1955)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeal to reappraisement listed above are the same in all material respects as the issues in the case of *United States*v. *Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc. et al.,*Suit 4783 and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> *496IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that the entered values of the merchandise involved in the case listed herein are equal to the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the Country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, and that the foreign value of such or similar merchandise was no higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be deemed submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the entered values.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.7 AMENDMENT TO
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO CONVERITBLE PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this
Amendment Agreement) is made and entered into as
of September 1, 2004, between O2 Diesel Corporation, a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Washington (the Company), and Jubilee Investment Trust,
Plc. (the Purchaser). Whereas, the Company and the Purchaser entered into a Convertible
Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated March 3, 2004 (the SPA), under which
the Company sold to Purchaser 800,000 shares of its Series A 0% Convertible
Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the Series A Preferred Stock).
The Series A Preferred Stock has the rights, preferences and privileges set
forth in the Certificate of Designation filed with the Delaware Secretary of
State on March 2, 2002, as amended on April 2,2004, and as corrected on June
9, 2004 (the Certificate). Whereas, the Company and Purchaser desire to amend the SPA and the
Certificate. Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the parties hereto
agree as follows: 1. Lock
Up. A new section 4.14 is hereby added to the SPA, to read,
in its entirety, as follows: 4.14 Lock Up. Purchaser agrees not to sell, transfer or assign
all or any part of the Series B Preferred Stock, or to convert the Series B
Preferred Stock as provided in the Certificate, for a period of two (2) years
following the Closing Date (as defined in the SPA), without the express written
consent of the Company, which may be withheld for any reason. 2. Amendment
to Certificate. The Certificate shall be amended to redefine
the term Floating Conversion Price as provided in the Articles of Amendment
attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Company shall file the Articles of Amendment with
the Washington Secretary of State promptly after the execution of this
Amendment Agreement and furnish proof of filing to Purchaser. 3. General. Except as herein provided, the SPA and the Certificate shall
continue in full force and effect. [Signatures on following page] 1




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed as of the date first indicated above. Company:O2 Diesel CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ ALAN RAEName: ALAN RAETitle: CEOPurchaser:Jubilee Investment
Trust, Plc.By:
    
    /s/ RUFUS PEARLName: RUFUS PEARLTitle: ASSISTANT INV, DIRECTOR
 2
No. 74-5889.

#### Esser *v.*Knapp et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
ABCI Holdings Inc.
 
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 
 I, Mark L. Baum, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ABCI Holdings Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The registrants certifying officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
 
 c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.  The registrants certifying officer has disclosed, based on his most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
 
 6.  The registrants other certifying officers have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: November 4, 2004/s/ Mark BaumMark L. BaumChairman, CFO
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 34 

Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the field of organic 

chemistry research and development and the first and only African American chemist to be inducted into the National Academy of Sciences. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2007 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, 

Mr. RANGEL, Mr. GORDON of Tennessee, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. NORTON, Mr. EHLERS, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. 

KILPATRICK of Michigan, Mr. HOLT, and Ms. MATSUI) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Science and Technology 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of Percy Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the 

field of organic chemistry research and development and 

the first and only African American chemist to be inducted into the National Academy of Sciences. 

Whereas Percy Julian was born on April 11, 1899, in Montgomery, Alabama, the son of a railway clerk and the first 

member of his family to attend college, graduating from 

DePauw University in 1920, receiving a M.S. degree 

from Harvard University in 1923 and a Ph.D. from the 

University of Vienna in 1931; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HCON 34 IH 

Whereas in 1935 Dr. Julian became the first to discover a 

process to synthesize physostigmine, the drug used in the 

treatment of glaucoma; 

Whereas Dr. Julian later pioneered a commercial process to 

synthesize cortisone from soy beans and yams, enabling 

the widespread use of cortisone as an affordable treatment of arthritis; 

Whereas Dr. Julian was the first African American chemist 

elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1973 for 

his lifetime of scientific accomplishments, held over 130 

patents at the time of his death in 1975, and dedicated 

much of his life to the advancement of African Americans 

in the sciences; and 

Whereas Dr. Julian’s life story has been documented in the 

PBS NOVA film ‘‘Forgotten Genius’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress honors the life of Percy 

3 Lavon Julian, a pioneer in the field of organic chemistry 

4 research and development and the first and only African 

5 American chemist to be inducted into the National Acad6 emy of Sciences. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS