alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9343]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed--Taxpayer Burden 
Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed--Taxpayer 
Burden Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted in San Diego, California. The TAP will be discussing issues 
pertaining to increasing compliance and lessening the burden for Small 
Business/Self Employed individuals.

DATES: The meeting will be held Friday, June 8 and Saturday, June, 9, 
2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed--Taxpayer 
Burden Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Friday, June 8, 2007 from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Saturday, June 9, 
2007 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. PDT at the Hilton San Diego Airport Hotel 
located at 1960 Harbor Island Drive, San Diego, CA 92101. Individual 
comments are welcomed and limited to 5 minutes per person. For more 
information and to confirm attendance, notification of intent to attend 
the meeting must be made with Marisa Knispel. Mrs. Knispel may be 
reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557. If you would like to have 
the TAP consider a written statement, please write to Marisa Knispel, 
TAP Office, 10 Metro Tech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 
11201, or you may post your comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: May 9, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-9343 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
99-0629 (La. 4/23/99)

#### Vicki BOWMAN, et al. v. Marguerite PICOU, M.D.

No. 99-C-0629.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Bowman, Vicki; Bowman, Robert; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Natchitoches 10th Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 68,594; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CA98-0969

Denied.

CALOGERO, C. J. not on panel.

LEMMON, J. would grant the writ.
No. 48156.

#### Protest 94651-K of Rodier, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 45938 the claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 was sustained.
EXHIBIT
      15.1




INDEPENDENT
      REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
      S-8 No. 333-117241) pertaining to the Fundtech Ltd. 1997 Israeli Share Option
      Plan for the Employees of Fundtech Ltd., the Fundtech Ltd. 1999 Employee Option
      Pan, and the Fundtech Ltd. Directors’ Option Plan, of our reports dated
      March 24, 2008, relating to the financial statements of Fundtech Ltd.
      (which report expresses an unqualified opinion), and the effectiveness of
      Fundtech Ltd.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this
      Annual Report on Form F-20 of Fundtech Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
      2007.





/s/
                BRIGHTMAN
                ALMAGOR & COBRIGHTMAN
                ALMAGOR & COCertified
                Public AccountantsA
                member of Deloitte Touche TohmatsuTel-Aviv,
                IsraelApril
                11, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Vander Zanden, President and Chief Executive Officer of School
Specialty, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the knowledge of the undersigned:

     1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 26,
          2003 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of School Specialty, Inc.

Date: July 9, 2003



                                      /s/ David J. Vander Zanden
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      David J. Vander Zanden
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed as filed
by School Specialty, Inc. for purposes of Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to School Specialty,
Inc. and will be retained by School Specialty, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the PBSJ Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 24, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ John B. Zumwalt                              
|                    |  |  |  | John B. Zumwalt                                  
|                    |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer             
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 24, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Donald J. Vrana                              
|                    |  |  |  | Donald J. Vrana                                  
|                    |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RALPH N. SMITH, Private First Class, U. S. Army, Appellant

8 USCMA 608, 25 CMR 112

No. 10,464

Decided January 17, 1958

*Major Edward Fenig*and *First Lieutenant William H. Carpenter*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *First Lieutenant Jay D. Fischer*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

HomeR FeRGüson, Judge:

In spite of his plea of not guilty, the accused was convicted of desertion, terminated by apprehension, in contravention of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885. On the question of intent, the law officer instructed the court as follows:

> “. . . intent may be proved by circumstantial evidence, that is, by facts and circumstances from which, alone or in connection with other facts, you may, according to the common experience of mankind, reasonably infer the existence of an intent such as evidence of a much prolonged period of absence without authority for which there is no satisfactory explanation.”

We held such an instruction prejudicial in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287, because it had the effect of shifting the burden of proof to an accused to prove his innocence rather than placing such burden on the Government to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The decision of the board of review, therefore, must be reversed and the record returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for resubmission to a board of review. The board, in its discretion, may approve the lesser included offense of absence without leave and reassess the sentence or it may order a rehearing on the desertion charge.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

LatimbR, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Soccio, 8 USCMA 477, 24 CMR 287.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MBT Financial Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ H. Douglas ChaffinH. Douglas ChaffinPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
      13.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Fundtech Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F
      for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yoram Bibring, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      June 29, 2007


/s/
                  Yoram BibringYoram
                  Bibring
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                (Principal
                  Financial Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Fundtech Ltd. and will be retained by Fundtech Ltd. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Exhibit 99.5

Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount("Credit Facility Agreement") Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK BatteryCo., Ltd ("the Debtor") and Shenzhen Eastern Branch, Agricultural Bank of China(the "Creditor") Dated November 26, 2009 

Main articles: 

-  Contract number:  81001200913170001; Maximum amount of credit  facilities to be provided: RMB 550 million; Term: from November 26,  2009 to October 22, 2010; Purpose of the loan is to  provide working capital for the Company; Interest rate will be  determined in each loan agreement to be signed under this Credit Facility  Agreement; If any of the following occurs, the Creditor is  entitled to demand adjustment of the maximum amount of credit facilities: -  Material adverse change    occurred in the market the Company served for or monetary policy    significantly adjusted; The financial condition    of the Company is in serious difficulty; The Company does not    carry out its obligations; Occurrence of other instances which endangers or    may endanger the safety of the loan provided by the Creditor; -  Remedies in the event of breach of contract include  adjustment of the credit amount, suspension of credit, and cancel the credit  unprovided. **Headlines of the articles omitted**-  Terms of credit The procedure on using  the comprehensive credit facility Guaranty The rights and  obligations of the Creditor The rights and  obligations of the Debtor Disputation settlement  Validity Validity Supplement articles Notification
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1214 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1214

 To amend title 10, United States Code, regarding restrictions on the 
    use of Department of Defense funds and facilities for abortions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 2011

 Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself, Mrs. Boxer, Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Shaheen, 
and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
            and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, regarding restrictions on the 
    use of Department of Defense funds and facilities for abortions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Access to Reproductive Care 
and Health for Military Women Act'' ``MARCH for Military Women Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FUNDS FOR ABORTIONS IN CASES OF 
              RAPE AND INCEST.

    Section 1093(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting before the period at the end the following: ``or in a case in 
which the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest''.

SEC. 3. RESTORATION OF PREVIOUS POLICY REGARDING RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MEDICAL FACILITIES.

    Section 1093 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 
1, is further amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b); and
            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``(a) Restriction on Use 
        of Funds.--''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 53241.

#### Miles Laboratories, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 146643-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of sheep gall the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle*
      *337
      *& Co.*v. *United Slates*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
Before the Second Division,

May 15, 1951

No. 55545.

#### Croton Watch Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 111689-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked *“A”*or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20 each as watch movements more than ]Ko of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
#### NATIONAL CANDLE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Dongguan Fay Candle Co., Ltd., TIJID, Inc. (doing business as DIJIT, Inc.), and Palm Beach Home Accents, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 05-1424.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 16, 2005.

*ORDER*

In accordance with this court’s June 15, 2005 order directing that if counsel for appellants did not enter an appearance by July 15, 2005, this appeal would be dismissed,*

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

(2) National Candle Association’s motion to dismiss is moot.

(3) All sides shall bear their own costs.

*

An entry of appearance was received on July 5, 2005 but was rejected because counsel was not a member of the bar of this court. It appears that no other document have been submitted,
Exhibit 32.1


                     WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada (the "Company")
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(a)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.


                                    /s/ Donald R. Mayer
Date: August 8, 2006                ____________________________________
                                    Donald R. Mayer
                                    Principal Executive Officer
                                    Principal Financial Officer
September *28,*1942

No. 47607.

#### Protest 11128-K of Richard Heilbrunn.

C. D. 668. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk May 22, 2013

t0515 

# Order

May 22, 2013

146518 & (45)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146518

COA: 305491

Jackson CC: 10

- 006208

- FH

MARY

- LYN RAE DANIELAK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to

re mand is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 295 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 295

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2008

        Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the deepest appreciation of Congress to the families of 
               members of the United States Armed Forces.

Whereas more than 2,000,000 Americans are demonstrating their devotion to the 
        United States and freedom by serving in the United States Armed Forces;
Whereas there are a multitude of family members, including mothers, fathers, 
        siblings, spouses, and children, supporting each member of the Armed 
        Forces;
Whereas, even in peacetime, the family of a member of the Armed Forces makes 
        concessions given the inherent dangers of military service and the 
        frequent relocations resulting in disruption of everyday routine;
Whereas, during wartime, family members endure increased sacrifices, forgo time 
        with their loved one, and face increased worry and uncertainty when 
        their loved one serves extended tours overseas or engages in enhanced 
        training activities;
Whereas an increasing number of family members have taken on volunteer 
        responsibilities in organizations associated with the Armed Forces;
Whereas the family of a member of the Armed Forces wounded in action willingly 
        accepts the additional role of caregiver, even when it requires 
        postponement of personal goals;
Whereas the families of members of the Armed Forces serve as a pillar of 
        strength and encouragement for those serving the interests of the United 
        States at home and abroad; and
Whereas the families of members of the Armed Forces play a critical role in 
        providing emotional support and readjustment assistance as members 
        transition from military life to civilian life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress expresses its deepest appreciation to the families, both 
immediate and extended, of members of the United States Armed Forces 
for the unwavering support, both physical and emotional, that family 
members give their loved ones while they answer the call to serve their 
country and keep the United States safe.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Robert F. Reeves,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
No. 48800.

#### Protests 993683-G, etc., of Morris Friedman et al. (Philadelphia, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.