alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Analysis of Health and Insurance Plans Under Collective Bargaining, Late 1955: Life Insurance, Accidental Death and Dismemberment, Accident and Sickness, Hospitalization, Surgical, Medical, Maternity

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Division of Occupational Outlook. 						*Analysis of Health and Insurance Plans Under Collective Bargaining, Late 1955: Life Insurance, Accidental Death and Dismemberment, Accident and Sickness, Hospitalization, Surgical, Medical, Maternity : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1221*,										November 1957,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4501,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Damian PALOMINO-FUNES, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-10047.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

*764Ronald C. Rachow, AUSA, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael K. Powell, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Reno, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suit*764able for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Damian Palomino-Funes appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand.

Palomino-Funes’ sentence was imposed at a time when the Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory. Because the Guidelines are now purely advisory, *see United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, ---, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764-67, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), we remand so the district court can determine if Palomino-Funes should receive a different sentence under the advisory Guidelines system. *See United States v. Hermoso-Garcia,*413 F.3d 1085, 1090 (9th Cir.2005).

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Before the Second Division,

January 15, 1941

No. 45215.

#### Protest 718733-G (A) of Great Western Mercantile Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Penn*(27 C. C. P. A. 242, C. A. D. 93) the mats in question were held dutiable at 90 percent under paragraph 1529 (a) as claimed.
## NUMBER 13
- 2 1
- 00 448
- C R

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ MIGUEL DIAZ , A ppellant ,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 28 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria
Appellant filed a notice of appeal attempt ing to appeal conviction s of aggravated robbery and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon . We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Sentence in this matter was imposed with a judgment of conviction entered on

October 21
, 2021

. Upon review of the documents filed, t he trial court has certified that2 this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” without permission

of the Court

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). On December 16 , 2021, th e Court ordered
appellant’s counsel to review the record and determine whether appellant had a right to
appeal. In response, appellant’s counsel filed a memorandum advising the C ourt of no
right to appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the t rial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly
, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

NORA L. LONGORIA Justice

Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the 3r d day of February, 2022.
Exhibit 32.2





TRC COMPANIES, INC.





Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of TRC Companies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 24, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:February 2, 2011/s/   Thomas W. Bennet, Jr.Thomas W. Bennet, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [IL228-2; FRL-8272-7] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of withdrawal action. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces that EPA is withdrawing the Notice of Final Agency Action of November 22, 2006 (71 FR 67560), for the Indeck-Elwood, LLC Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit, because the Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) remanded the permit in part. On September 27, 2006, the EAB of the EPA denied in part, and remanded in part, a petition for review of a federal PSD permit issued to Indeck-Elwood, LLC by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. According to 40 CFR part 124, a final permit decision shall be issued by the Regional Administrator when the EAB issues a decision on the merits of the appeal and the decision does not include a remand of the proceedings. Because the EAB's decision on this permit appeal included a partial remand, there is not yet a final agency action subject to review. 

      ( print page 2879)    

# ADDRESSES:

The documents relevant to the above action are available for public inspection during normal business hours at the following address: Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard (AR-18J), Chicago, Illinois 60604. To arrange viewing of these documents, call Constantine Blathras at (312) 886-0671. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Constantine Blathras, Air and Radiation Division, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard (AR-18J), Chicago, Illinois 60604. Anyone who wishes to review the EAB decision can obtain it at                         *http://www.epa.gov/​eab/​.*

Dated: January 17, 2007. 

Bharat Mathur, 

Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 5.

 [FR Doc. E7-920 Filed 1-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Independent Accountant's Report


November 2, 1998

To the Board of Directors
of Oakwood Acceptance Corporation

We have examined management's assertion about Oakwood Acceptance Corporation's
(the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended September 30, 1998
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures, as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
September 30, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP
No. 53264.

#### Bellows & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 88430-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
No. 54945.

#### Walker Services *v.*United States,

protests 151032-K and 151034-K (Boston).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wool flocks the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Walker Services*v. *United States*(24 Cust. Ct. 190, *C.*D. 1230), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ERRATA SHEET

Errata for Management of Substance Use Disorders A. Screening and Treatment 2015 Version 2.0

Printed Pocket Card

The online version has been corrected and reflects all changes defined on the errata

Please print this out and attach to the printed Substance Use Disorder Pocket Card

Correction made on August 10, 2017

Content Correction (Printed Pocket Card): Table A – Under Disulfiram-Under Warnings/Precautions

It Should Read: Alcohol-disulfiram reaction; patients must be vigilant to avoid alcohol in all forms 

including mouthwash, over the counter medication, etc.

NOT: Ensure adequate muscle mass for intramuscular injection.
Searched for **https://pic.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://pic.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNASA requirements and applications environments for electrical power wiringSerious problems can occur from insulation failures in the wiring harnesses of aerospace vehicles. In most recorded incidents, the failures have been identified to be the result of arc tracking, the propagation of an arc along wiring bundles through degradation of insulation. Propagation of the arc can lead to the loss of the entire wiring harness and the functions which it supports. While an extensive database of testing for arc track resistant wire insulations has been developed for aircraft applications, the counterpart requirements for spacecraft are very limited. The electrical, thermal, mechanical, chemical, and operational requirements for specification and testing of candidate wiring systems for spacecraft applications is presented.Document ID19930010463Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsStavnes, Mark W.*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Brook Park, OH, United States)*Hammoud, Ahmad N.*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Brook Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1992Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-7569NAS 1.26:191064NASA-CR-191064Meeting InformationMeeting: Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering ConferenceLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: August 3, 1992End Date: August 7, 1992Sponsors:AIAA,IEEE,ANS,SAE,ACS,AIChEAccession Number93N19652Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 323-57-4ACONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25266Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930010463.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Before the Third Division,

May 18, 1950

No. 54332.

#### Levy & Levis Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 152921-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of U.S. RealTel, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Charles B. McNamee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                      By: /s/ Charles B. McNamee
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Charles B. McNamee
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


April 3, 2003
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32


      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Technology Industries, Inc., on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Allan Klepfisz, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and James
Samuelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:   June 9, 2005                 /s/ Allan Klepfisz
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Allan Klepfisz, President

Date:   June 9, 2005                 /s/ James Samuelson
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      James Samuelson, Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

20 2 1 WY 44

October Term, A.D. 20 20

March 24, 2021

CHARLES GOLDNER LANDRUM,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff). S

- 20

- 0258



### O RDER 

### A FFIRMING THE 

### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### ’ S 

### J UDGMENT AND 

### S ENTENCE

[¶ 1 ] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that

Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Pursuant to a plea agreement,

Appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to one count of failure to register as a s ex

offender

. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7

- 19

- 3 02 ; § 7

- 19

- 307

. The district court imposed a two to

f ive

- year sentence. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s Se ptember

16

, 20 20 , “ Judgment and Sentence

. ”

[¶ 2] On January 19 , 20 2 1 , Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion

to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently ordered that Appellant may

“file with this Co urt a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider

in this appeal.” This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief

expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if

appropriate, make a final decision” on this appeal. Appellant’s pro se brief was due for

filing on or before Ma rch 5 , 2020. Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading

in the time allotted.

[¶ 3] Now, f

ollowing a careful review of the record and the “ Anders brief” submitted by

appellate counsel

, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should begranted and the district court’s “ Judgment and Sentence ” should be affirmed

. It is,

therefore,

[¶ 4 ] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court

- appointed counsel

for A ppellant Charles Goldner Landrum , is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of

record for A ppellant; and it is further

[¶ 5 ] ORDERED that the Natrona County D istrict C ourt’s September 16

, 20 20

,

“ Judgment and Sentence ” be , and the same hereby is , affirme d

.

[¶ 6 ] DATED this 2 4 th day of Ma rch , 20 2 1

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

MICHAEL K

. D A VI S

Chief Justice
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I,
Robert M. Jakobe, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Sheridan Group, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for
the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 29, 2011

By:

/s/ ROBERT M. JAKOBE Robert M. Jakobe Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Shannon Zimmerman                                                                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Shannon      Zimmerman, Chief Executive Officer, Presidentand      Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                                                                                               |
|   | May      17, 2010                                                                                  |

----