alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Sec.1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of O2Diesel Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “Report”), I, Alan Rae, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company and I, David H. Shipman, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
      my knowledge that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 14, 2006




By:
            /s/
                Alan Rae
            By:
            /s/
                David H. ShipmanName:
            Alan Rae
            Name:
            David H. ShipmanTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                  Executive Officer)
            Title:
            Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer




This
      certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
      requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
      be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than
      as
      specifically required by law.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to O2Diesel Corporation and will be retained by O2Diesel Corporation
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense Logistics AgencyThe Nation's Combat Logistics Support Agency

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  What DLA Offers    -  Excess Property Disposal             
  -  Document Services             
  -  Products             
  -  Services             
  -  Programs 
-  Working With DLA    -  Applications             
  -  Small Business             
  -  Federal and International Cataloging             
  -  Defense Data Standards             
  -  Events             
  -  Procurement Policies             
  -  Government Programs             
  -  Forms 
-  Organizations    -  DLA Headquarters             
  -  DLA Aviation             
  -  DLA Disposition Services             
  -  DLA Distribution             
  -  DLA Energy             
  -  DLA Land and Maritime             
  -  DLA Troop Support             
  -  DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM             
  -  DLA Europe & Africa             
  -  DLA Indo-Pacific 
-  Customer Support    -  Self Help Tools             
  -  How to Order             
  -  Find Your Order             
  -  Customer Facing Offices             
  -  Training             
  -  Brochures             
  -  Warfighter Support             
  -  Customer Service Management 
-  Careers		 
-  About DLA    -  Contact Us             
  -  Locations             
  -  Leaders             
  -  News             
  -  History             
  -  Media Gallery             
  -  DLA Campaigns 

HomeAbout DLANewsNews Article View

PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# Troop Support Hall of Fame inductees for 2017 announced

By DLA Troop Support Public Affairs

                PHILADELPHIA  –              

Army Col. Mark Simerly, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support commander, announced the 2017 inductees for the DLA Troop Support Hall of Fame:
                                -  Army Maj. Gen. Steven Shapiro, former commander, DLA Troop Support 
                                -  Christos Cosfol, former deputy director, Procurement Process Support 
                                -  Ray Miller, former deputy director, Subsistence 

“All of these individuals made an everlasting contribution to Troop Support,” Simerly said, “and collectively, we are a better organization as a result of their efforts ... now and in the future.”

The Hall of Fame ceremony will be held Nov. 21 at the Bldg. 6 auditorium at Naval Support Activity Philadelphia. 

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
No. 39115.

#### Protests 450394-G, etc., of Strauss Bros. & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the record presented articles in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those involved in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as claimed.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">TAM Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Dor Guy Marcel, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Richard G. Latin, J.), entered December 19, 2013. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action was premature because plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Performance Plus Med., P.C., as Assignee of Melanna Luckie v Nationwide Ins.</i> (____ Misc 3d ____, 2016 NY Slip Op ______ [appeal No. 2013-2766 Q C], decided herewith), the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: October 11, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
33799, 33800.

#### WILLIAMS v. BYRD (two cases).

Per curiam.

After injuring her right hand while working as an employee of the Byrd Cookie Company, Mary L. Williams applied for and received benefits under the Georgia Workmen’s Compensation Act. Additionally, she and her husband each filed suit against Benjamin T. Byrd, Jr., the president and general manager of the company, whose negligence allegedly caused the injury. Byrd filed motions to dismiss each action, urging that the claims were barred by Code Ann. § 114-103.

Code Ann. § 114-103 provides: "The rights and the remedies herein granted to an employee shall exclude all other rights and remedies of such employee, his personal representative, parents, dependents, or next of kin, at common law or otherwise, on account of such injury, loss of service or death: Provided, however, that no employee shall be deprived of any right to bring an action against any third-party tortfeasor, except employees of the same employer.” In response, the Williamses attacked the constitutionality of the 1974 amendment to this statute, Ga. L. 1974, pp. 1143,1144, which added the last phrase, "except employees of the same employer,” on the ground that it violates Georgia’s due process clause (Code Ann. § 2-101), and Georgia’s equal protection equivalent (Code *81Ann. § 2-203). Dennis Williams also argued that even if the statute is not unconstitutional, it does not bar his claim for medical expenses and loss of services and consortium as the injured employee’s husband. After hearing, the trial court granted summary judgments to defendant Byrd on his motions in both cases.

Argued July 12, 1978

Decided September 6, 1978.

*Frank R. Cullum,*for appellants.

*Miller, Beckmann & Simpson, JohnB. Miller, Luhr G. C. Beckmann, Jr., Lamar W. Davis, Jr.,*for appellee.

We affirm. Code Ann. § 114-103 bars an employee’s action for negligence against a fellow employee and it is not unconstitutional for any reason alleged by appellants. See 2A Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law § 72.20 (1976). No case to the contrary has been cited or found. As for the contention that the statute does not bar the husband’s cause of action for the negligence of the defendant, this court previously decided this issue adversely to him. *Gulf States Ceramic v. Fenster,*228 Ga. 400 (185 SE2d 801) (1971), revg. 124 Ga. App. 102 (182 SE2d 905) (1971).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Order entered January 15, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00983
- CV
MEREDITH HICKS
- CAPLETON DBA GEMSTON E MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING, LLC, Appellant
V. DESOTO CHAMBER OF CO MMERCE, Appellee

On Appeal from the C ounty Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 12
- 05372
- D 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 12, 2015, second motion to extend deadline for production of the clerk’s and reporter’s records. In its motion, appellant requ ests an additional sixty days to pay for the clerk’s and reporter’s records. We GRANT appellant’s request to the extent that we extend the time to pay for T HIR TY DAYS . Appellant shall provide this Court with written proof of payment or arrangements to pay for the reporter’s and clerk’s records within T HIR TY DAYS of the date of this order. The reporter’s and the clerk’s records shall be due THIRTY DAYS after appellant provides written proof of payment or arrangements to pay for the records.We caution appel lant that no further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
University of Kentucky
    UK Libraries
    Special Collections Research Center
Menu
    About
                    About ExploreUK
            How to
                    Activate your Researcher AccountRequest MaterialsVisit SCRCFind Copyright and Use Information
            Contact Us
            Researcher Account LoginSearch Home |
    Back to Search Results

Download
    JPEGof this page
    PDFof entire itemOrganization and procedures of the Alabama Department of Public Welfare, prepared by Wilma Van Dusseldorp under the supervision of T. J. Woofter, Jr., Coordinator of Rural Research
Date
1936Creator
United States. Works Progress Administration. Division of Social Research.Language
EnglishCollection
Alabama Works Progress Administration PublicationsDescription
Other contributors include Dusseldorp, Wilma Van; Woofter, Thomas Jackson, b. 1893; United States. Works Progress Administration. Division of Social Research. [2], 70 l. : maps ; 27 cm. Mimeographed.  At head of title: Works Progress Administration, Harry L. Hopkins, administrator. UK holds archival copy for ASERL Collaborative Federal Depository Program libraries. Call number Y 3.W 89/2:13/L-1.

You may come across language in UK Libraries Special Collections Research Center collections and online resources that you find harmful or offensive. SCRC collects materials from different cultures and time periods to preserve and make available the historical record. These materials document the time period when they were created and the view of their creator. As a result, some may demonstrate racist and offensive views that do not reflect the values of UK Libraries.

If you find description with problematic language that you think SCRC should review, please contact us at SCRC@uky.edu.

Item Details
Text

Rights
This digital resource may be freely searched and displayed in accordance with U. S. copyright laws.Geographic Subject
AlabamaFormat
booksPermalink
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/catalog/xt73tx353392XML Metadata
https://exploreuk.uky.edu/dips/xt73tx353392/data/mets.xml

The text may or may not be an accurate representation of the original.
#### In re Katherine Thompson TOUSANT.

No. 99-OB-1336.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 4, 1999.

PER CURIAM.*

In this joint petition, respondent, Katherine Thompson Tousant, and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) move to transfer respondent to disability inactive status. The petition alleges that respondent is currently suffering from “an emotional disability with chronic, severe depression,” but no supporting evidence is attached. Inasmuch as the court must make the determination of the claim of *628incapacity when a lawyer files a petition for transfer (solely or jointly with disciplinary counsel) during the course of a disciplinary proceeding,1 evidence of incapacity should be filed with a petition for transfer.

Subsequent to the filing of the petition, we ordered the ODC to supplement the record with a copy of the report of respondent’s psychiatrist. Based on this supplementation, we conclude there is sufficient evidence to justify a transfer to disability inactive status pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 22.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Katherine Thompson Tousant be transferred to disability inactive status pending further orders of this court. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 26 E, this order shall be effective immediately.

*

 Kimball, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part II, § 3.

1

. The petition for transfer also should indicate whether a disciplinary proceeding is pending. If a pending proceeding is in the confidentiality stage, that information may be supplied under seal.
99-0002 (La. 4/23/99)

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tyronne FORREST.

No. 99-KO-0002.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1999.

IN RE: Forrest, Tyronne; — Defendants); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. *“J”*Number 387-885; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number 97KA-1992

Denied.

VICTORY, J. not on panel.
Case No. 6,967.

#### HYDE v. COHEN et al

[11 N. B. R. (1874) 461.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Bankruptcy —Fraudulent Transfer of Stock.

A bill was filed against C., alleging that the bankrupt had fraudulently put into C.’s hands certain sums of money which, after the adjudication, was used to purchase a number of shares in a sewing machine company, and praying that the plaintiff, as assignee, may be declared to be entitled to the stock as assets of the bankrupt’s estate. *Held,*that plaintiff is entitled to a decree; that the defendant C. vest in the plaintiff the title to the stock in question, and pay the cost of this suit.

[This was a suit by Charles H. Hyde, as-signee, against Abraham Cohen and others, for the recovery of certain shares of stock.]

G. A. Seixas, for plaintiff.

R. S. Newcombe, for Cohen.

1

**[Reprinted by permission.]

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The bill claims that the bankrupts fraudulently put into the hands of the defendant Cohen certain sums of money wl)ich he, after the adjudication in bankruptcy, and before the commencement of this suit, paid out, at their request, for the purchase of seven hundred and twenty-five shares of the New York Shuttle Sewing Machine Co., certificates for which he holds. The bill prays that the plaintiff may be declared to be entitled to the stock, as assets of the estate of the bankrupts, and that he may recover the same from the defendant Cohen. I think the plaintiff has established such claim by the evidence; and as it appears that the defendant Cohen has certilicátes for the seven hundred and twenty-five shares still in his possession, certificates for five hundred and fifty of them being in his own name, and certificates for one hundred and seventy-five of them being transferred thereon to him in blank, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree that the defendant Cohen vest in the plaintiff the title to the seven hundred and twenty-five shares, and pay the costs of this suit. The decree will also declare that, as against the plaintiff, the bankrupts and Cohen have no title .to the stock, or to the moneys with which it was purchased.
No. 54891.

#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 155014-K and 156760-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6891

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. JAMES ROCKETT, III, a/k/a James Rocket, a/k/a James Rockett, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:05-cr-00135-WDK-JEB-1; 2:07-cv-00336-WDK)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 23, 2008

Before KING, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Rockett, III, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Rockett, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rockett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we deny Rockett’s motions for production of transcripts and to expand the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 53824.

petition 6664-R (Los Angeles).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., and Imperial Gas Co. *v.*United States,

*233Opinion by

Cline, J.

From an examination of the testimony it appeared that the importer made no effort to ascertain the market value of the merchandise. However, the testimony showed that the cylinders were sold by the importer to the purchaser of the gas; that the cylinders were returned from time to time to be refilled; and that they were not ordinarily resold. Therefore, the court stated that a prudent man might assume that there was no other or higher market value for such cylinders than the price charged by his firm. *Glendennig, McLeish &*Co. *(Inc.)*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 387, T. D. 41320), *John Wroblewski*v. *United States*(28 C. C. P. A. 150, C. A. D. 137), and cases there cited. On the record' presented it was held that the petitioners acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. *Linen Thread Co.*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 395, T. D. 41322) cited. The petition was therefore granted.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-15T11:24:02Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-15T11:24:03Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-15T11:24:03Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12620">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-15T11:24:02Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION # O-7505 WAS NEVER ISSUED OK 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
| 1.   | The      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28,      2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Periodic      Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 7, 2008 | /s/      Martin M. Koffel    |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|
|                    | Martin      M. Koffel        |
|                    | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                    |                         |
| Dated:      May 7, 2008 | /s/      H. Thomas Hicks     |
|                    | H.      Thomas Hicks         |
|                    | Chief      Financial Officer |
|                    |                         |