alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---



Exhibit 99.19

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the Contract) Entered into by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd, Xiangqian Li (the Guarantor) and Tianjin Branch, Bank of Dalin (the Creditor) on
November 27, 2009

Main contents:

- Guaranty Contract number: DLQ Jin200911160032;
- Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd and Xiangqian Li undertake to assume joint and
  several liabilities for BAK International (Tianjin) Limited (the Obligor)s indebtedness towards Bank of Dalian under the Comprehensive Credit Facility Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.: DLQ Jin200911160032) from November
27, 2009 to November 26, 2010, and the maximum amount secured is RMB 80 million.
- Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty under this Contract shall be
guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay
off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including
the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in advance to its original expiry
date due to default of the obligor or the guarantor).
- Scope of Guaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of the loan principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of
contract compensation, damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost, lawyers fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is incurred to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility Agreement and relevant agreement entered into under the Credit Facility Agreement.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Termination and explanation
- Payment on demand
- Declaration and undertaking of the Guarantor
- Obligations of the Guarantor
- Continuity of guaranty
- Amendment and explanation of the Contract
- Disputation settlement
- Validity
- Supplement articles

---
Exhibit 32.1   WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of WorldNet, Inc. of Nevada (the “Company”) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (a) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: August 8, 2007 /s/ Donald R. Mayer Donald R. Mayer Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, I, Kevin M. Goodwin, Chief Executive Officer of SonoSite, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SonoSite, Inc.

/s/ KEVIN M. GOODWINKevin M. GoodwinPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


March 14, 2007

77

---
**Exhibit 15.3**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statement No. 333- 214581 on Form F-4 and Forms S-8 (Nos.333-165065,333-165566,333-169272,333-171231,333-172069,333-178664,333-188517,333-192806,333-201386 and 333-208634) of Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV of our report dated March 14, 2016, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of and for theyear ended December 31,2015, of Ambev S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV for the year ended December 31, 2016.The consolidated financial statements of the Company are not separately presented in Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV’s annual report on Form 20-F.

São Paulo, Brazil, 

March 22, 2017 

/s/ DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU 

AuditoresIndependentes
No. 43127.

#### Protest 711954-G of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 41517 the rubber articles in question were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 as claimed.
No. 54323.

#### Alma Berge et al. *v.*United States,

protests 139649-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 52477, the claim at *33%*percent under paragraph 412 was sustained.
Opinion issued April 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-13-00814-CV

———————————

IN RE JP FOODS, LLC, CAI YI, THE XENOS YUEN FAMILY 

IRREVOCABLE TRUST, CREDIT LINK FINANCE LIMITED 

COMPANY, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JP Foods, LLC, Cai Yi, Xenos Yuen Family Irrevocable Trust, and Credit 

Link Finance Limited Company filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging 

(1) the trial court’s order denying a motion to compel further depositions in Case 

Number 12-DCV-202514 and (2) the trial court’s decision to abate in Case 
2

Number 12-DCV-202531 pending a bankruptcy court ruling regarding the 

application of the automatic stay under 11.U.S.C. §362.* 

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.

 

*

The underlying cases are Nkasi Comfort Onyung v. Credit Link Finance Limited 

Company, and the Yuen Family Irrevocable Trust a/k/a/ Xenos Yuen Family 

Irrevocable Trust (cause number 12-DCV-202514) and Nkasi Comfort Onyung v. 

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Foods, LLC (cause number 12-DCV-202531), 

pending in the 434th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Hon. James H. 

Shoemake presiding.
No. 96-7744.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
      32.2











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION
      1350)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation
      (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending November 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William M.
      Rudolphsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      William M.
      Rudolphsen


William
      M. Rudolphsen


Chief
      Financial Officer


Dated: 
      December 27, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Walgreen Co. and will be retained by Walgreen Co. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
California Walnut Board

California Walnut Commission

101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 250

Folsom, CA 95630-4726

(916) 932-7070

June 6, 2012

Submitted electronically

Linda Irokawa-Otani, Regulations Coordinator

Office of Legislation and Policy

Department of Pesticide Regulation

1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4015

Sacramento, CA 95812-4015

Subject: Comments on a Notice of Proposed Regulatory Action and Notice of Public Hearing 

On a Proposed Ozone State Implementation Plan Amendment regarding Amendment of Title 3, 

California Code of Regulation (3 CCR) sections 6452, 6452.2, and 6864; amend section 6452.4 

and renumber to 6881; renumber section 6890 to 6864; and adopt sections 6558, 6577, 6880, 

6883, 6884, and 6886.

Dear Ms. Irokawa-Otani,

The California Walnut Board (CWB) is an active participant of the Pesticide AG-SIP Workgroup 

and California Specialty Crops Council (CSCC). During recent discussions we learned one of 

the active ingredients (ai’s) called oxyfluorfen (trade name Goal 2XL) has been identified in the 

proposed regulation as a high VOC and faces limited or no application from May 1 to October

31st starting in 2014.

Oxyfluorfen remains an important herbicide in walnut orchards, especially during spring and 

summer months to control weeds prior to harvest. The alternative low VOC oxyfluorfen, while 

acceptable in pre-emergent application, appears unacceptable for post-emergent usages unless 

it is combined with other herbicides or similar agents (Robert Van Steenwyk, UC Berkley). 

Studies to prove the efficacy of these low VOC oxyfluorfen combined with “kickers” are under 

way but have not been completed according to Brad Hanson, Cooperative Extension Weed 

Specialist, UC Davis. 

Until these potential alternatives are investigated and a science-based solution can be found, 

the CWB urges that an exemption to section 6884 section (b0 to include low rates of high-VOC 

formulations of oxyfluorfen for spring and summer orchard floor weed control prior to harvest. 

The California walnut industry consists of over 4,000 growers and 82 handlers 

(processors/marketers). They represent almost $1 billion in farm gate value and are one of 

California’s top export commodities.

Thank you for considering my comments.

Sincerely,

Dennis A. Balint

Chief Executive Officer
# C_2015337EN.01001202.xml

| 12.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/12

---

Order of the General Court of 16 July 2015 — NK Rosneft and Others v Council

(Case T-69/15) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine - Lis pendens - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2015/C 337/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: NK Rosneft OAO (Moscow, Russia); RN-Shelf-Arctic OOO (Moscow); RN-Shelf-Dalniy Vostok ZAO (Yuzhniy-Sakhalin, Russia); RN-Exploration OOO (Moscow); and Tagulskoe OOO (Krasnoyarsk, Russia) (represented by: T. Beazley QC)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Council Decision 2014/872/CFSP of 4 December 2014 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, and Decision 2014/659/CFSP amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP (OJ 2014 L 349, p. 58), and Council Regulation (EU) No 1290/2014 of 4 December 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine, and amending Regulation (EU) No 960/2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (OJ 2014 L 349, p. 20), in so far as those acts concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1) | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2) | NK Rosneft OAO, RN-Shelf-Arctic OOO, RN-Shelf-Dalniy Vostok ZAO, RN-Exploration OOO and Tagulskoe OOO shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

NK Rosneft OAO, RN-Shelf-Arctic OOO, RN-Shelf-Dalniy Vostok ZAO, RN-Exploration OOO and Tagulskoe OOO shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 228, 13.7.2015.

1

---
#### ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Respondent, v. Joseph P. AFSHARI, Appellant.

No. 73502.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Sept. 29, 1998.

*28Lloyd E. Eaker, Clayton, for appellant.

John A. Ross, County Counselor, Eva C. Konieczny, Assistant County Counselor, Clayton, for respondent.

Before *HOFF,*P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RUSSELL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Joseph P. Afshari, appeals the judgment on remand of the Municipal Court of St. Louis County entered in favor of respondent, St. Louis County, on St. Louis County’s prosecution of Afshari for multiple building code violations. We dismiss the appeal.

Afshari was charged with sixteen counts of building code violations in the St. Louis County Municipal Court. These violations were for failing to obtain a general occupancy permit before occupation of premises owned by Afshari and operated by his tenant and for violating the terms of a temporary occupancy permit.

On August 17, 1995, Afshari was found guilty of the sixteen charges by the Municipal Court of St. Louis County. Afshari appealed that decision to this court. This court affirmed eight of the sixteen counts, reversed eight of the counts and remanded for sentencing. On June 16, 1997, the Municipal Court of St. Louis County sentenced Afshari on the remaining eight counts. On July 25, 1997, Afshari filed his notice of appeal.

In prosecutions of ordinance violations, the rules of criminal procedure are to be applied. *City of Webster Groves v. Erickson,*789 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Mo.App. E.D.1990). Rule 30.01(d) sets out the time frame for appealing. In pertinent part, the rule states, “No such appeal shall be effective unless the notice of appeal shall be filed not later than ten days after the judgment or order appealed from becomes final.” The sentencing of a defendant constitutes and has the same meaning as a judgment or final judgment. *State v. Lynch,*679 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo.banc 1984).

Afshari’s notice of appeal was filed more than ten days after the Municipal Court sentenced him and therefore was untimely.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002I, David H. Shipman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of O2Diesel Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006   /s/ David H. Shipman David Shipman  Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Earnings and Employment of Seamen on U.S. Flag Ships

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Earnings and Employment of Seamen on U.S. Flag Ships : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1238*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										1958,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4530,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 50695.

#### Protests 96958-K, etc., of Latorraca Bros. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entries herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 932). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, judgment was entered directing the collector to reliquidate the entries herein, refunding the duty established to have been taken in excess, in accordance with the decision and judgment in Abstract 45178.
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1949, Part XII, Pacific slope basins in Washington and upper Columbia River basin

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1152

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned, as Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Operating Officer of VSE Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that
to the best of the undersigned's knowledge:


	1) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	2) the information contained in the Company's Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated: April 30, 2008                    /s/ M. A. Gauthier
                                         ___________________________
                                         M. A. Gauthier
                                         President,
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Operating Officer
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Day Care Services: Industry's Involvement

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Besner, Arthur. 						*Day Care Services: Industry's Involvement : Women's Bureau Bulletin, No. 296*,												Washington: 								Govt. Print. Off., 										1971,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5559,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER