alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

May 8, 1951

No. 55534.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61235-K (New York).

Opinion by

Etcwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *The Otto Gerdau Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 24, C. D. 1120) and *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(id. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

TheBoard of Directors 

SonoSite, Inc: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-49401, 333-74833, 333-82739, 333-51820, 333-60112, 333-89518, 333-97973, 333-110913, 333-124451, 333-124452, and333-150602) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-91083, 333-68610 and 333-83278) on Form S-3 of SonoSite, Inc. of our reports dated March 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of SonoSite, Inc. as ofDecember 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, and shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and therelated financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of SonoSite, Inc. 

Our report dated March 26, 2010 on the consolidated financial statements referred to above refers to the Company’s adoption ofFinancial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (included in FASB ASC Topic 470-20 “Debtwith Conversion and Other Options”) as of January 1, 2009. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 26, 2010
Before the Second Division,

September 23, 1942

No. 47585.

#### Protests 71223-K, etc., of John Zimmerman Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of hemp knotted straw hats, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained as to certain of the items.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 7 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk August 7 , 2020

1 6 1 7 28 ( 3 4 )

WAYNE COUNTY JAIL INMATES,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

SC: 161728

v COA: 354075

Wayne CC: 71

- 173217

- CZ

WILLIAM LUCAS as WAYNE COUNTY

SHE RIFF, WAYNE COUNTY COMMISSION,

and WAYNE COUNTY EXECUTIVE,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

_______________________________________ ____ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Sheriffs ’ Association to

file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED

. The amicus brief submitted on July 31 , 2020 , is

accepted for filing

.
#### Astra Glove Co. et al. *v.*United States

No. 6806.

Entry No. 725751, etc.

Invoices dated London, England, October 15, 1945, etc.

Entered at New York, N. Y., December 5, 1945, etc.

(Decided January 23, 1947)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*Paul P. Rao,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1042 (c)). *United States*v. *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.,*33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

Undisputed facts show export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values less additions made by the importers on entry because of advances in similar cases.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'

Board of Directors and Shareholders
International Sports and Media Group, Inc.
(Formerly San Diego Soccer Development Corp.)
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 330770631) of International Sports and Media
Group, Inc. (formerly San Diego Soccer Development Corp.) of our audit report
dated March 25, 2004, which is part of and relates to the financial statements
contained in this Form 10-KSB, and all references to our firm included in this
Form 10-KSB.
HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah 
April 13, 2004
No. 47613.

#### Protest 84572-K of Olivier Straw Goods Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with the agreed facts and following Abstract 46497 the knotted sisal hats in question were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JOANNA S. DIAL, Dependent Wife of Specialist Second Class, James W. Dial, U. S. Army, Appellant

9 USCMA 541, 26 CMR 321

No. 11,425

Decided August 26, 1958

*Captain Arnold I. MelnicJc*argued the cause for Appellant, Accused. With him on the brief were *Colonel James Garnett*and *Captain John F. Christensen.*

*542
      *First Lieutenant William H. Keniry*argued the cause for Appellee, United States. With him on the brief were *Colonel J. L. Searles*and *Major Thomas J. Nichols.*

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused and her husband were charged with causing the death of their one-year-old son. They were convicted by a general court-martial in Germany of involuntary manslaughter, in violation of Article 119, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 919. A board of review affirmed the conviction. The Judge Advocate General of the Army filed a certificate requesting this Court to consider whether the court-martial had constitutional power to try the accused as a civilian dependent accompanying the Army in West Germany.

Article 2 (11) of the Uniform Code, 10 USC § 802, confers jurisdiction upon a court-martial to try civilian dependents of service personnel who accompany the armed forces outside of the continental limits of the United States. Last year the United States Supreme Court by divided vote held that the congressional grant of power was unconstitutional as applied to a civilian dependent charged with a capital offense in time of peace. The majority opinion written by Justice Black, and concurred in by the Chief Justice and Justices Douglas and Brennan, contains dictum to the effect that, under the Constitution, Congress cannot subject civilian dependents accompanying the armed forces abroad in peacetime to court-martial jurisdiction regardless of the nature of the offense. The other concurring Justices, Frankfurter and Harlan, specifically limited their agreement with Mr. Justice Black; they concurred on the ground that the offense charged was capital. Reid v Covert, 354 US 1, 1 L ed 2d 1148, 77 S Ct 1222 (1957).

Appellate defense counsel and the Government present substantially the same arguments that were urged before the United States Supreme Court in the Reid v Covert case. We have gone over much the same ground in other cases before us. See United States v Burney, 6 USCMA 776, 21 CMR 98; United States v Wilson, 9 USCMA 60, 25 CMR 322. All that remains is to determine whether, in non-capital cases, dependents of military personnel in foreign lands, who are associated with the military in every way except in the performance of military duties, can constitutionally be considered by Congress as part of the armed forces for the purpose of regulating their conduct on the same basis as those in uniform. In our opinion, Congress has that power.

We answer the certified question in the affirmative, and affirm the decision of the board of review.

Judges LatimeR and Feeguson concur.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1478 

AN ACT 

To modify the boundary of the Minuteman Missile National 

Historic Site in the State of South Dakota, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1478 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Minuteman Missile Na3 tional Historic Site Boundary Modification Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION. 

5 Section 3(a) of the Minuteman Missile National His6 toric Site Establishment Act of 1999 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 

7 Public Law 106–115) is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 

9 paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and 

10 (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(3) VISITOR FACILITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE

13 SITE.— 

14 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the 

15 components described in paragraph (2), the his16 toric site shall include a visitor facility and ad17 ministrative site located on the parcel of land 

18 described in subparagraph (B). 

19 ‘‘(B) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land 

20 referred to in subparagraph (A) consists of— 

21 ‘‘(i) approximately 25 acres of land 

22 within the Buffalo Gap National Grass23 land, located north of exit 131 on Inter24 state 90 in Jackson County, South Da25 kota, as generally depicted on the map en26 titled ‘Minuteman Missile National His-
3 

†S 1478 ES

1 toric Site Boundary Modification’, num2 bered 406/80,011A, and dated January 14, 

3 2011; and 

4 ‘‘(ii) approximately 3.65 acres of land 

5 located at the Delta 1 Launch Control Fa6 cility for the construction and use of a 

7 parking lot and for other administrative 

8 uses. 

9 ‘‘(C) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map de10 scribed in subparagraph (B) shall be kept on 

11 file and available for public inspection in the 

12 appropriate offices of the National Park Serv13 ice. 

14 ‘‘(D) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JU15 RISDICTION.—Administrative jurisdiction over 

16 the land described in subparagraph (B) is 

17 transferred from the Secretary of Agriculture to 

18 the Secretary, to be administered as part of the 

19 historic site. 

20 ‘‘(E) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The 

21 boundaries of the Buffalo Gap National Grass-
4 

†S 1478 ES

1 land are modified to exclude the land trans2 ferred under subparagraph (D).’’. 

Passed the Senate December 30, 2012. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1478 

AN ACT 

To modify the boundary of the Minuteman Missile 

kota, and for other purposes. National Historic Site in the State of South Da-
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9088]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-07-008]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding The Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: May 15, 2007 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 

1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
2. Minutes.
3. Ratification List.
4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1104 (Final) (Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from 
China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary 
of Commerce on or before May 24, 2007.)
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 7, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-9088 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Harry E. Gruber, M.D.,President and Chief Executive Officer of Kintera, Inc. (the “Registrant”),certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof the Registrant;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4.             The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and we have:

 

(a)           designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors:

 

(a)           all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 

Dated:  May 17, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Harry E.  Gruber, M.D.             |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Harry E.  Gruber, M.D.                 |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

----
EXHIBIT 3.7







AMENDMENT NO. 4





TO THE BYLAWS OF





CNL RETIREMENT PROPERTIES, INC.





By resolution adopted by the board of directors of CNL Retirement Properties, Inc. (the Company), the board of directors (the Board) has authorized the following amendment to the Companys Bylaws:



Section 11 of Article III, as amended, is to be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:



SECTION 11. COMPENSATION. Directors will be entitled to receive compensation for the services or activities they perform or engage in as Directors as may be determined by the Board of Directors by resolution (including the affirmative vote of a majority of the Independent Directors). The Company will not pay any compensation to the officers and Directors of the Company who also serve as officers and directors of the Advisor. Directors may be reimbursed for expenses of attendance, if any, at each annual, regular or special meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee of the Board of Directors and for their expenses, if any, in connection with any other service or activity they performed or engaged in as Directors. Nothing in this Section 11 of Article III will be construed to preclude any Director from serving the Company in any other capacity and receiving compensation in connection therewith.



The foregoing is certified as Amendment No. 4 to the Bylaws of the Company, adopted by the Board (including a majority of the Independent Directors) on March 8, 2006 and effective as of January 1, 2006.





/s/  Lynn Gutierrez

Lynn Gutierrez, Secretary
North Springfield Sustainable Energy Project, LLC #AP-11-038 

Based on the Agency's review of the Facility's application and the above Findings of Fact, the 

Agency concludes that the Facility, subject to the following Permit conditions, complies with all 

applicable state and federal air pollution control laws. Therefore, pursuant to 10 VSA §§556, as 

amended, the Agency hereby issues a Permit approving the Facility, as described in the above 

Findings of Fact, subject to the following: 

PERMIT CONDITIONS 

- Construction and Equipment Specifications -

(1) The Permittee shall construct and operate the Facility in accordance with the plans and 

specifications submitted to the Agency and in accordance with the conditions set forth 

herein, including the equipment specifications as listed in Findings of Fact (A) or their 

equivalent as approved by the Agency. [10 v.s.A. §556(c)] [§5·501(1) of the Regulations] 

(2) The Permittee shall construct the wood fired boiler and its associated equipment with an 

energy efficient design as described in their permit application and subsequent 

submissions to the Agency. These energy efficient design features include, but are not 

limited to: preheating of fluidizing bed air and overfire air using air heaters, four cycles of 

feedwater heating, heat recovery from boiler blowdown and a district heat loop (thermal 

heat loop). The maximum capacity of the thermal heat loop will be designed to deliver 

no less than 20 MMBtu/hr of net heat energy. The actual quantity of thermal energy 

delivered through the thermal heat loop will depend upon the actual demand for heat 

from the businesses and residences on the loop. [§5·502 of the Regulations I 

(3) Air Pollution Control Equipment- Boiler 

(a) The Boiler shall be equipped with a particulate matter control system consisting 

of a fabric filter. The fabric filter shall be maintained in good working order and 

properly operated whenever the Boiler is combusting fuel, except as provided 

below. During periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the Permittee shall, 

to the extent practicable, maintain and operate the fabric filter in a manner 

consistent with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions. 

(b) The Boiler shall be equipped with a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system for 

controlling nitrogen oxides. All elements of the SCR system shall be maintained 

in good working order and shall be operating whenever the Boiler is running, 

except during the startup of the Boiler. The startup period for the Boiler ends 

when the SCR catalyst has reached full operating temperature. A numeric value 

for the full operating temperature of the SCR catalyst shall be established in the 

Facility's Operating Permit. 

[10 1/.S.A. §556(c)][Applicalion for AP-11·038 [40 CFR §60.11d] 

(4) The Boiler fabric filter collector shall be equipped with a pressure drop measurement 

device which continuously measures, displays and permanently records the pressure 

drop across the fabric filter collector. The Permittee shall use the pressure drop 

Page 18 of 39
Before the Second Division,

March 27, 1943

No. 48148.

#### Protests 9453-K, etc., of Adolphe Hurst & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the items consist of hemp hats similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218) and other items consist of knotted hemp hats similar to those involved in Abstract 46497. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained as to those items.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of COMPAÑÍA
INTERNACIONAL DE TELECOMUNICACIONES S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mario Eduardo
Vázquez, Vice Chairman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                             
|------ |  | ----------------------------
|      
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/    Mario Eduardo Vázquez
|       |  |                             
|Name:  |  | Mario Eduardo Vázquez       
|Title: |  | Vice Chairman               



Date:
April 16, 2004
---

Summary of Guaranty Contract of Maximum Amount ( the
Contract) Entered into by and between BAK International Limited (the
Guarantor)and Longgang Branch, Shenzhen Development
Bank (the Creditor) on January 21, 2011

Main contents:

- Guaranty Contract number: Shenfa Longgang Ebaozi 20110120001-1;
- Bak International Limited undertakes to assume joint and several
  liabilities for Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd (the Obligor)s indebtedness
  towards Shenzhen Development Bank under the Comprehensive Credit Facility
  Agreement of Maximum Amount (reference no.: Shenfa Longgang Zongzi
  20110120001) from January 26, 2011 to January 18, 2012, and the maximum amount
  secured is RMB200 million.
- Guaranty Responsibility: The guaranty under this Contract shall be
  guaranty with joint and several liabilities. The guarantor is obligated to pay
  off the debt in the event the obligor is unable to pay off the debt (including
  the creditor declares the debt becomes mature in advance to its original
  expiry date due to default of the obligor or the guarantor).
- Scope of Guaranty:The guaranty shall cover all of the loan
  principal, interest, penalty interest, breach of contract compensation,
  damages, undertaking fee and all the expenses such as litigation cost,
  lawyers fee, notification cost and public notice cost etc. which is incurred
  to the Creditor in realizing its creditors right.
- Guaranty period: The guaranty period is from the effective date of
  this Contract to two years after the expiry of the term of the Credit Facility
  Agreement and relevant agreement entered into under the Credit Facility
  Agreement.

Headlines of the articles omitted:

- Payment on demand
- Guarantee period
- Guarantee Responsibility
- Instances of Breach of Contract and its Liabilities
- Declaration, guaranty and undertaking of the Guarantor
- Amendment of the Contract
- Effectiveness and Disputation settlement

---