alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-0010V 

Filed: March 22, 2016 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ELLEN DENHAM, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

 * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination; Shoulder 

 * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner. 

Linda Renzi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On January 4, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of her October 17, 2014 influenza (“flu”) 

vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the 

Office of Special Masters. 

On March 21, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes 

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report 

at 1. Specifically, respondent “concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent 

with SIRVA, and that it was caused in fact by the flu vaccine she received on October 

27, 2014.” Id. at 3. Respondent agrees that no other causes have been identified for 

petitioner’s injury, and that petitioner suffered “the sequela of her injury for more than six 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

months. “ Id. Respondent further indicates that “based on the record as it now stands, 

petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. 

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v RAYMUNDO V. CERVANTES, Private E-1, U. S. Army, Appellant

9 USCMA 574, 26 CMR 354

No. 11,192

Decided September 12, 1958

*Major Edward Fenig*and *First Lieutenant James G. Garner*were on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel John G. Lee*and *First Lieutenant Thomas M. Lofton*were on the brief for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The issue here is the same as in United States v Martin, 9 USCMA 568, 26 CMR 348, decided this date. For the reasons there stated, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.
(Reap. Dec. 9623)

#### Kussi & Feigl, Inc. Globe Shipping Co., Inc., et al. v. United States

Entry No. 978264, etc.

(Decided March 4, 1960)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the appeals for reappraiseinent listed in Schedule “A”, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are limited to the following items and are abandoned in all other respects:

> 3981 E Necklet

> 7342 E Necklet

> 7342 EB Bracelet

> 3981 EB Bracelet

> 7237 E Necklet

> 7237 EB Bracelet

> 934 Ooulants

> 7344 E Necklet

> 7344 EB Bracelet

> 933 Ooulants

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that as so limited the issues are the same in all material respects as the issues involved in *Bert Friedberg & Company*v. *United States,*Reappt. Dec. 8690 and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the prices at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar mer-*596ch'andise was freely offered for sale for -home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States were the appraised unit values less 15.35% plus-1.01%. ■

In the cited case, the court held foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise there under consideration, and that such sfcafc-' utory value did not include the so-called “French sole or unique tax.”

On the agreed facts and following the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is statutory foreign value, and hold that such value for the items in question is the appraised unit values, less 15.35 per centum, plus 1.01 per centum.

The appeals for reappraisement are dismissed as to all other merchandise.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 26576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8942]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-156779-06]
RIN 1545-BG27


Determining the Amount of Taxes Paid for Purposes of Section 901; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to notice of proposed 
rulemaking that was published in the Federal Register on Friday, March 
30, 2007 (71 FR 15081) providing guidance relating to the determination 
of the amount of taxes paid for purposes of section 901.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bethany A. Ingwalson, (202) 622-3850 
(not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-156779-06) that is the 
subject of this correction is under section 901 of the Internal Revenue 
Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, this notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-156779-06) 
contains an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of 
clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-156779-06), 
that was the subject of FR Doc. E7-5862, is corrected as follows:
    On page 15085, column 3, in the preamble, first full paragraph of 
the column, under the paragraph heading ``3. Comments and Proposed 
Regulations'', lines 1 and 2, the language ``The fifth condition is 
that the counterparty is a person (other than the'' is corrected to 
read ``The fifth condition is that the arrangement involves a 
counterparty. A counterparty is a person (other than the''.

LaNita Van Dyke,
Branch Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and 
Administration).
[FR Doc. E7-8942 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**Exhibit31.1**

I, Douglas M. Pihl, certify that:

1.          I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MathStar, Inc.;

2.          Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.          Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)         Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)        [intentionallyomitted];

c)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)        Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)         All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)        Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2006 | By     | /s/ Douglas M.  Pihl                    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Douglas M. Pihl                         |
|                    |   | President and Chief  Executive  Officer |

 

----
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROSHAN RAMKHELAWAN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 3824

[ January 6, 201 6 ]

Appeal of order dismissing rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara McCarthy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 04

- 822 CF10A

.

Roshan Ramkhelawan, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

We affirm the circuit court’s order denying habeas corpus relief . Our

af firmance is without prejudice to appellant seeking appellate review of the

trial court’s disposition of the Rule 3.850 motion following the evidentiary

hearing and entry of a final order. Fla. R. Crim.P. 3.850(k).

Affirmed without prejudice.

S TEVENSON

, G ROSS and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Medical Solutions Management Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned Lowell Fisher, Interim Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)and EJ
McLean, Vice President and Controller (principal accounting and financial officer) of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                   |  |                                                                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2008 |  |                                                                        
|                   |  | /s/ Lowell M. Fisher                                                   
|                   |  | Lowell M. Fisher                                                       
|                   |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer)          
|Date: May 13, 2008 |  |                                                                        
|                   |  | /s/ EJ McLean                                                          
|                   |  | EJ McLean                                                              
|                   |  | Vice President, Controller (principal
accounting and financial officer)
Exhibit
32
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
USC, SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Metaphor Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Mark L. Baum, Esq., the CEO of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
      May 24,
      2005/s/    Mark
      L. Baum, Esq.Mark
      L. Baum, Esq.Chairman,
      CEO and CFO
<PAGE>


      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Penseco Financial Services Corporation (the "Company")
certifies to his knowledge that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as
for the dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-K.

/s/ Craig W. Best
-------------------
Craig W. Best
President and CEO
February 29, 2008



<PAGE>



       CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Penseco Financial Services Corporation (the "Company")
certifies to his knowledge that:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as
for the dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-K.

/s/ Patrick Scanlon
-------------------
Patrick Scanlon
Senior Vice President, Controller
February 29, 2008
----

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Medina Coffee,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Harry Miller, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
Date: May 14, 2004
/s/ Harry Miller

_______________________      Harry Miller, C.E.O and C.F.O
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of The PBSJ Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert J. Paulsen, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                            
| |  | ------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------
| |  |              |  | 
| |  | May 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    ROBERT J. PAULSEN                   
| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  |                                            
| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Robert J. Paulsen, Chief Operating Officer,
| |  |              |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Secretary
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Allen F. Wise, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Coventry Health Care, Inc.;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







| |  |  |  |                                      |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | ------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | By: /s/ Allen F. Wise               
| |  |  |  | Allen F. Wise                        |  | 
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |  | 
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | Date: April 30, 2013                 |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1341 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1341

 To provide a point of order against consideration of any measure that 
  would increase the statutory limit on the public debt above $14.294 
 trillion unless that measure has been publicly available for a full 7 
     calendar days before consideration on the floor of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2011

    Mr. Sessions (for himself, Mr. Vitter, Ms. Ayotte, and Mr. Lee) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide a point of order against consideration of any measure that 
  would increase the statutory limit on the public debt above $14.294 
 trillion unless that measure has been publicly available for a full 7 
     calendar days before consideration on the floor of the Senate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF DEBT MEASURES.

    It shall not be in order in the Senate to proceed to any measure 
that would increase the statutory limit on the public debt above 
$14.294 trillion unless that measure has been available on a public 
website for a full 7 calendar days before consideration on the floor of 
the Senate.
                                 <all>
```