alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>rcert312-123103.txt            Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, David Robinson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Uptowner
         Inns, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report.

         4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures
to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiary is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period
in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;







- 1 -
<PAGE>
         5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors:

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial
data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves
management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and


6.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
indicated
in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



	/s/ David Robinson
	Chief Financial Officer
	February 16, 2004





















- 2 -
<PAGE>
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Collective Bargaining Clauses: Company Pay for Time Spent on Union Business

              																	Gentry, John Newton. 						*Collective Bargaining Clauses: Company Pay for Time Spent on Union Business : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1266*,												Washington, D.C: 								G.P.O., 										October 1959,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4547,			accessed on September 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 40430.

#### Petition 5653-R of A. W. W. Kyle Co. (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

The evidence consisted entirely of hearsay statements as to an alleged error in printing the inserts in question. It was found that the petitioner failed to prove that there was no intention to defraud the revenue, and on the record presented the petition was denied.
Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 03, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18A0761. KENDRICK DAYE v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration 

of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals 

Rule 13.

On December 06, 2017, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than December 15, 2017. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).

Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate 

review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 

264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995):

This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a 

brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while 

you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's 

failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, 

you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time 

appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will 

have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the 

trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the 

trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days 

from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a 

notice of appeal from that order.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 03, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to 

the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy 

of this order to the appellant.
No. 50692.

#### Protests 113959-K, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion, by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held entitled to free entry as claimed.
Exhibit
10.38





ADDENDUM
TO EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT





This
ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AND
NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT (this "Addendum"), dated as
of February 18, 2008, is between The Sheridan Group, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the "Employer"), and John
A. Saxton (the "Employee")
(collectively, “the Parties”).





WHEREAS, the Parties entered
into an Employment and Non-Competition Agreement (the “Agreement”) on or about
April 1, 2007; and





WHEREAS, a question has arisen
between the Parties with respect to the application and duration of §§6(e), 7, 8
and 9 of the Agreement; and





WHEREAS, the Parties wish to
enter into this Addendum to clarify their intent and eliminate any ambiguity
with respect to §§6(e), 7, 8 and 9 of the Agreement; and





WHEREAS, it is the intent of
the Parties that all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue to
remain in full force and effect, subject to the clarification set forth in this
Addendum.





NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby
agreed as follows:





1.           The
above recitals are incorporated herein by reference, and are intended to be
binding upon the Parties.





2.           The
Parties acknowledge and agree that it is the mutual intent of the Parties that
the Employee’s rights and remedies upon termination set forth in §6(e) of the
Agreement apply to the termination at anytime of
Employee’s employment by the Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors and/or
assigns) without Cause pursuant to §6(c) or by the Employee with Good Reason
pursuant to §6(d).  Moreover, it is the Parties’ specific intent that
the Employee’s rights and remedies upon termination set forth in §6(e) will
survive the termination of the Agreement.





3.           The
Parties acknowledge and agree that it is the mutual intent of the Parties that
the Employee’s obligations to the Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors
and/or assigns) set forth in §7 (Inventions; Assignment); §8 (Confidential
Information); and §9 (Non-Competition) of the Agreement apply to the termination
at any timeof Employee’s employment with Employer (and/or the Employer’s successors
and/or assigns). Moreover, it is the Parties’ specific intent that the
Employee’s obligations to the Employer set forth in §7, §8 and §9 will survive
the termination of the Agreement.





4.           The
Parties each acknowledge and agree that this Addendum is supported by the
consideration set forth in the Agreement, which the Parties acknowledge to be
good and valuable.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be duly executed as of the date and year first above
written.





THE SHERIDAN GROUP,
      INC.By:
            /s/RobertM.JakobeRobert M. JakobeChief
      Financial Officer & Executive VP/s/JohnA.SaxtonJohn A. Saxton
No. 96-5737.

#### DeBardeleben *v.*Hawk, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
34203.

#### HARRIELL v. STYNCHCOMBE.

Submitted November 14, 1978

Decided November 30, 1978

Rehearing denied December 20, 1978.

*B. L. Spruell,*for appellant.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet,*
      *766
      *Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General,*for appellee.

*765Jordan, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of murder in Indiana in 1943 and escaped from that state’s prison in 1969. The State of Indiana sought extradition from the State of Georgia which was granted.

Appellant filed a habeas corpus petition contending that the extradition papers were inaccurate and insufficient and that he was illegally convicted. After a hearing the trial court denied the petition.

We have carefully examined the record and find the extradition papers in compliance with the Uniform Extradition Act. Questions relating to the constitutionality of the appellant’s conviction cannot be raised in a habeas corpus extradition proceeding in this state. *Smithwick v. Olson,*229 Ga. 494 (192 SE2d 337) (1972).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
SERVED: MARCH 14, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ,_:.' i !o J l 3 /~, q: 5 .i 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CORNERSTONE AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1293 

ERRATA 

The docket number in the previously served March 13, 2013, Order Granting Request for 

Continuance is incorrect. 

Attachment: Service List 

~('~~ · Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Susan J. Horstman, ChiefExecutive Officer_ 

Cornerstone Aviation, Inc., Respondent 

337 North 2370 West #130 

Salt Lake City, UT 84116 

TEL: 801-355-2244 

FAX: 801-355-2754 

Kyle Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-1293 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2Wl 000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Appendix C - California SIP-approved PSD Permit Programs

District

Has SIPapproved 

PSD Rule? Rule #

NOx is 

Ozone 

Precursor?

Defines 

PM2.5?

PM2.5 

Condensables?

PM2.5 

Baseline 

Date

PM2.5 

Increment 

Values

PM2.5 

Precursors 

Listed?

Regulates 

GHG's? FR Citation Notes

1 Eastern Kern APCD Yes 210.4 Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR 77 FR 73317

2 Imperial County APCD Yes 904 Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR 77 FR 73317 Partial PM2.5 NA area

3

Mendocino County AQMD Yes 130

220

Y; (p7) Y; (p1) Y; (p1) No Y; (p7) Y; (p7)

Y; (a)1

76 FR 26192

50 FR 30942

4

Monterey Bay Unified APCD Yes 207 (SIP)

207

Y; 2.48

Y; 2.51

No;

Y; 2.47

No

Y; 2.47

No

Y; 2.5.1

No

Y; 2.5.2

N; 2.48

Y; 2.51

Y; 1.2

Y; 2.1.2

65 FR 5433

Proposed

Publication of proposed rule 

pending

5

North Coast Unified AQMD Yes 130

220

FIP

No

No

Y; FIP

No No No No No

Y; (a)(1)

64 FR 6223

50 FR 30941

76 FR 48006

6

Northern Sonoma County APCD Yes 130

220

Y; (p6) Y; (p1) Y; (p1) No Y; (p7) Y; (p6)

Y; (a)(1)

76 FR 26192

47 FR 15785

7 Placer County APCD Yes 518 Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR 77 FR 73317 Partial PM2.5 NA area

8 Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Yes 203 Y; IBR NA NA NA NA NA Y; IBR 76 FR 43183 PM2.5 NA area

9 San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Yes 2410 Y; IBR NA NA NA NA NA Y; IBR 77 FR 65305 PM2.5 NA area

10 Yolo-Solano AQMD Yes 3.24 Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR Y; IBR 77 FR 73317 Partial PM2.5 NA area

11

South Coast AQMD No - 

Yes (GHG)

EPA

1714

FIP NA NA NA NA NA

Yes 77 FR 73320

PSD FIP in place for NAAQS 

PSD SIP approved for GHGs 

Partial PM2.5 NA area

"IBR" = rule incorporates 40 CFR 52.21 by reference

NA = nonattainment area, therefore area is subject to nonattainment NSR requirements, rather than PSD requirements

Partial PM2.5 NA Area = nonattainment NSR requirements apply to nonattainment portion of district; PSD requirements apply to unclassifiable/attainment portion of district

Copies of SIP-approved rules are available at the following website via the "California" link: www.epa.gov/region09/air/sips/index.html
U.S. Department of

Transportation

Office of the Secretary

Of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave .. S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

HAY Z 3 2014

The Honorable Dan Benishek

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Congressman Benishek:

Thank you for your letter regarding Essential Air Service (EAS) at Gogebic-Iron County Airport

(lWD) serving the Ironwood area in the Upper Peninsula. In the letter, you stated your concern

that as of February 1,2014, the airport would lose its sole commercial carrier, Great Lakes

Aviation, Ltd. (Great Lakes), when it suspended operations.

As you may be aware, Great Lakes suffered severe operational problems in the first quarter of

2014 that were caused by a lack of pilots due in part to recent statutory and regulatory changes

involving pilot training requirements and the carrier's implementation of the changes.

Prior to this, in December 2013, the Department solicited proposals for new service at Ironwood,

as Great Lakes' contract was set to expire on May 31, 2014. In response to that request for

proposals, the Department received proposals from two air carriers, Great Lakes and Multi-Aero,

Inc. d/b/a Air Choice One (Air Choice One). In early February, the Department solicited the

community's feedback on the proposals, and,in response, the Gogebic-Iron County Airport

Board recommended Air Choice One's option that provided 18 round trips per week to Chicago

O'Hare International Airport (ORD).

On April 18, 2014, the Department issued an Order selecting Air Choice One to provide the

proposed service that was recommended by the community.

I am pleased to tell you that last week, Air Choice One announced details of its fare structure and

flight schedule, which begins July 7, 2014.

I, along with Michael Gormas of my team, provided periodic updates on the situation to your

offices via email and telephone.

The Department appreciates Ironwood's active involvement in the carrier-selection process and

we wish the community and Air Choice One much success.
- 2-

A copy of this letter will be placed in Ironwood's docket (DOT-OST-1996-1266) on

www.regylations.gov.

Sincerely,

Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division
No. 55464.

#### The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 167489-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
### Electrical-analog-model study of water resources of the Columbus area, Bartholomew County, Indiana

By: Frank A. WatkinsJ. E. Heisel

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1981

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (927 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (808 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (1567 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No.
33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they
be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Skilled Healthcare
Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his
knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Dated: March 30, 2004 /s/ BOYD HENDRICKSONBoyd Hendrickson
Chief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. and will be retained by Skilled
Healthcare Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Skilled Healthcare
Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his
knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Dated: March 30, 2004 /s/ JOHN HARRISONJohn Harrison
Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. and will be retained by Skilled
Healthcare Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1915 : Part 11, Pacific slope basins in California

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp411

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.